HomeMy WebLinkAbout3549_001VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Ordinance No. 4140
Next Resolution No. 7-90
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 6, 191 -
meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior citizen Center February 6, 1990
So South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
1I. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Parley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Arthur
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, January 16, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
V1. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. Request for Village to pay membership dues for
Sister City Program
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE MOUNT PROSPECT
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EXPO
B. Request to create a Class "W" liquor license
for the Mickey's Diner, formerly Arnold's at
Busse Avenue and Main Street.
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XV
ENTITLED PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE OF CHAPTER 21
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance establishes the requirement to
board -up vacant structures with material similar
to that of the major portion of the building.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Pate Subdivision, 1000 Cardinal Lane
The Petitioner is proposing a 7 lot subdivision
requiring modifications from the Development Code
as follows: Eliminate the requirement for
sidewalks on the cul de sac; increase the
permitted length of the cul de sac; reduce the
minimum lot widths on 4 lots; permit parkway
trees to be planted on private property; and,
pavement width of 27 feet. Recommendations
attached.
(Exhibit A)
(Exhibit B)
B. ZBA 69 -SU -89, 1716 Freedom Court
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1716 FREEDOM COURT
This ordinance grants a Special Use to permit a
3 -car garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended denying the request by a vote of 3-2. (Exhibit C)
C. ZBA 77 -SU -89 and ZBA 78-V-89, Courtesy Rome Center
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 740 EAST RAND ROAD
This ordinance grants a Special Use in the
nature of a Planned Unit Development. (Exhibit D)
D. ZBA 66 -SU -89 and ZBA 67-V-89, 1500 S. Elmhurst Road
1. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
SPECIAL USE AND GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE VENTURE STORE,
1500 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
This ordinance amends the Planned Unit
Development for the Venture Property by relocating
2 outlots which will house 2 drive-thru, fast-
food restaurants; authorizing a 20,000 square
foot addition to the existing Venture building;
granting variations to allow a 20 foot parking
lot setback instead of the required 30 feet
along Elmhurst & Dempster Roads; and, a zero
foot parking lot setback instead of the required
20 feet on the west and north property lines.
Also included in this Ordinance is the
requirement to execute a Restrictive Covenant
relative to the installation of public
improvements. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended approving these requests. (Exhibit E)
E. Mount Plaines Animal Hospital, 888 E. Northwest Hwy
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS
FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16)
This Ordinance grants modifications from the
Development Code relative to storm water detention
in the proposed paved parking lot. The Plan
Commission recommended denying these requests. (Exhibit F)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 1-V-90, 103 South Edward
The Petitioner is requesting a zero foot front
yard and 41 811 side yard to permit a parking pad.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying
these requests by a vote of 2-5.
B. ZBA 2 -SU -90 and ZBA 3-V-90, 800 Kennicott Place
The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use to
permit a 3 car garage and variations to permit
a garage size of 704 square feet and a driveway
width of 291 6". The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by votes
of 6-0.
C. ZBA 4-V-90, 1000 South Na Wa Ta
The Petitioner is requesting variations to
permit a storage shed 4-1/21 from the principal
structure, 10-1/21 high and setback 2-1/21 from
the side property lot line. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended denying the 4-1/21 separation
between structures by a vote of 0-6, to deny the
2-1/21 side yard setback by a vote of 2-4 but to
approve the height request by a vote of 6-0.
D. ZBA 9-V-90, 4 North Pine
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit
a 3.5 side yard instead 5 feet and a 23 foot front
yard instead of 30 feet. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended denying the side yard variation
by a vote of 0-7 and recommended granting the
front yard variation by a vote of 7-0.
E. Recommendations of the safety Commission:
1. Need to designate Fire Lane on Henry Street
adjacent to Busse School. The recommendation
of the Safety Commission is that no
additional parking restrictions are necessary.
2. Request of resident for STOP sign on
Hunt Club Drive at the 'IS" curve. The
Safety Commission recommends -denying
request.
F. Southwest corner of Elmhurst & Algonquin Roads
I. ZBA 81-Z-89 and ZBA 82 -SU -89
The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from B-3
to I-1 and a Special Use in the nature of a
Planned Unit Development to permit 3 office/
warehouse buildings. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests
by a vote of 6-0.
2. Request to change the Comprehensive Plan in
order to allow industrial/office rather than
commercial/office on this site. The Plan
commission recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0.
3. Roger's Plat of Subdivision
4. Request for modification from the Development
Code (Chapter 16) to permit storm water
detention in the loading dock areas.
G. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER OF A PORTION OF
SCHOENBECK ROAD TO THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinances accepts jurisdiction of that
portion of Schoenbeck Road within the Village
limits, pursuant to the Old orchard Consent Decree. (Exhibit G)
H. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE FIRST NATIONAL
BANK OF MOUNT PROSPECT AS A DEPOSITORY
This Resolution creates a checking account
for to handle medical insurance payments (Exhibit H)
I. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A MONEY-MARKET
ACCOUNT AT THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF
MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit J)
J. A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUNDS
This Resolution authorizes the appropriation
of $613,000 from Motor Fuel Tax Funds for
the 1990 General Maintenance Program (Exhibit K)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. Consultant for removing asbestos from
Senior citizen Center building
2. Biodegradable paper compost bags
B. Request authorization for an expenditure
to make emergency repairs to sanitary sewer
in the 400 block of Wa Pella.
C. Request to increase contract with Arrow Road
by $23,000 for the resurfacing project.
These funds were appropriated for this project
from Motor Fuel Tax Funds last year.
D. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT
TO THE NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYSTEM AGREEMENT
This amendment will permit the City of Prospect
Heights to become a member of the System. (Exhibit L)
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
A. Accept public improvements installed in
conjunction with the Brentwood Subdivision
(east of Wolf Road between Euclid & Kensington)
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Personnel and Pending Litigation
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JANUARY 16, 1990
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Absent: Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Floros. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, APPROVE MINUTES
moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held
January 2, 1990.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Pass: Busse
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, APPROVE BILLS
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
$ 622,066
Community Development Block Grant Fund
32,143
17,705
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
59,754
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
76,577
Parking System Revenue Fund
5,116
Risk Management Fund
84,390
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
1,028
Special Service Area Const. #5
Special Service Area Const. '#6
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989
2,000
Debt Service Funds
4,149
Flexcomp Trust Fund
3,017
Escrow Deposit Fund
5,597
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
..
Benefit Trust Fund
$913,542
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVE Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
FINANCIAL REPORT to accept the financial report dated December 31,
1989, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
OATHS OF OFFICE Village Clerk Carol Fields administered the Oath of
Office to Charles "Buzz" Livingston, having been
promoted from Lt. and appointed to the position of
Captain in the Fire Department.
Fire & Police Commission Chairman Henry Friedricks
administered the oaths of Office to Henry Dawson and
Gary Klein, having been promoted to the position of
Lt. in the Fire Department.
Mr. Friedricks also administered the Oath of Office
to Firefighter/Paramedic recruit Terry Reinlein.
CRYSTAL TOWERS Lloyd Levin, representing the Crystal Towers
TRAFFIC Homeowners Association, asked what response has been
received by the Village from the State of Illinois
relative to their request to prohibit right turn on
red for eastbound traffic on Algonquin Road onto
Busse Road. It was noted that the Mayor stated the
Village would try to assist the residents of that
complex when the problem was brought to the Board's
attention a couple of months ago.
Village Manager Dixon stated he would look into the
matter.
Mr. Levin also asked if Crystal Towers was included
in the flood study that has recently been completed,
noting that the complex did experience flooding
during the last year or so. Mr. Dixon responded
that Crystal Towers was not part of the area
studied.
MAYOR'S REPORT
AMEND CH.13 Mayor Farley presented an Ordinance for 2nd reading
BEER GARDENS that would prohibit beer gardens to be located
within 300 feet of a residential zoning district.
The Ordinance also provided for existing beer
gardens located within 300 feet of a residential
district to phase the hours of operation for the
outdoor activities.
It was noted that this Ordinance was presented in
November and at the request of the Chamber of
Commerce final action was deferred until this
meeting so they could study the effect of these
regulations on the members of the Chamber.
Michael Moran, representing the Chamber of Commerce,
stated that the Chamber felt this Ordinance would
adversely affect the businesses involved and
requested that action be deferred in order to give
the residents and businesses the opportunity to work
out a solution to the problem. Janet Hansen,
Director of the Chamber, also spoke in opposition
to the proposal.
Page 2 - January 16, 1990
The following residents spoke in support of the
regulations proposed:
Lloyd Levin, 1777 Crystal Lane
Dave Ensky, Windsor Drive
Mike Weksler, 606 Windsor Drive
Paul Russo, attorney for McBrides on Rand Road, spoke
on behalf of the owner Of Mc Brides, noting that a
landscape plan had been prepared in an effort to
buffer any noise that may emanate from the beer
garden, however, Mr. Russo stated the landscape
architect required a level of noise in order to
propose the appropriate buffer.
It was noted that the Village had not taken such a
measurement nor was such a measurement anticipated,
however, beer bottles thrown over the residents
fences or loud abusive language would be affected
but trees or shrubs.
Mayor Farley stated that the Village has given
ample time for the property owner to meet with
the neighbors and propose a Solution to the
noise problem and therefore he did not favor
deferring final action.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD -NO. 4130
for passage of Ordinance No. 4130
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 ENTITLED
"ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR DEALERS" OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was • for 2nd reading that would
amend Article XV of Chapter 21 Of the Village •«
and would require vacant structures to be boarded
up in •
similar to that of the major portion
of the building. The proposed Ordinance also
provided for a permit fee of $75.00 and a bond
requirement of A. per ♦. foot of area to be
boarded up.
Mike Moran, representing the Chamber of Commerce,
noted that the Ordinance as Proposed would require
a fee from a businessman that may have gone out of
business due to financial restrictions and would
place Yet another hardship on that businessman. He
also stated that the Ordinance was not clear as to
the area to be boarded up that would require the
bond.
Following discussion it was the consensus of the Board
that the bond requirement be deleted in its entirety,
that the permit fee be reduced from $75.00 to $25.00
and that the Ordinance be amended accordingly and
presented for final approval at the next meeting on
February 6th.
Mayor Farley requested concurrence of the Village ELK GROVE
Board to defend the law suit filed • the Elk RURAL FIRE
Grove Fire
• District against the Village.
It it the desire of the Fire District to have the
Agreement between that District and the Village
dated November, 1988, declared invalid.
Page 3 - January 16, 1990
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the
administration and authorize the Village Attorney
to defend the law suite filed by the Elk Grove Rural
Fire Protection District against the Village.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH.13 Mayor Farley presented an Ordinance that would
DELETE CLASS 'IS" authorize deleting the Class 'IS" liquor license
issued to Florenz Restaurant, located at the
northeast corner of the Elmhurst and Rand Roads
within the Randhurst Shopping Center. This
restaurant has gone out of business.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to consider an item not listed on the agenda, namely
the liquor license for Florenz Restaurant.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Hays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4131 Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4131
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
AMEND CH. 21 & 22 An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
DOWNSPOUTS would establish regulations governing the size,
location and permitted direction of downspouts, as
provided in Chapter 22 of the village Code. Also
presented for second reading was an Ordinance amending
that section of Chapter 21 of the Village Code
governing downspouts and gutters in the Property
Maintenance Code.
ORD.NO. 4132 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4132
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 22
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried
Page 4 - January 16, 1990
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, ORD.NO- 4133
moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4133
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XV
OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem.
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 83-V-89, 805 S. Elmhurst Road ZBA 83-V-89
An Ordinance was presented for first reading 805 S. EINHURST
that would allow a circular driveway and to
permit impervious coverage of 52% rather than
35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
approving these variations.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays:, None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for
ORD.NO. 4134
passage of Ordinance No. 4134
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 805 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 85 -SU -89, 1731 W. Pheasant Trail
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant a Special Use permitting day
ZBA 85 -SU -89
a care
home. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
1731 PHEASANT
granting this request.
TRAIL
At the request of the Petitioners, Trustee Van Geem,
seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings
of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
for passage of Ordinance No.
ORD.NO- 4135
4135
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1731 PHEASANT TRAIL
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 5 - January 16, 1990
ZBA 86 -SU -89 ZBA 86 -SU -89, 1201 North Ardyce Lane
1201, N.ARDYCE LN An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a Special Use that would allow an existing family
care home with 5 developmentally disabled individuals,
as permitted by Code, to increase the number by one.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request.
NEW BUSINESS
MT. PLAINES Mt. Plaines Animal Hospital, 888 E. Northwest Highway
ANIMAL HOSPITAL Dr. Dreessen, owner and operator of this animal
888 E.NORTHWEST hospital, and his attorney Timothy Murphy, presented
HIGHWAY a request to waive specified requirements of the
Development Code (Chapter 16).
It was noted that Dr. Dreessen had requested, and was
granted, variations from the Zoning Ordinance necessary
to move the existing business next door to a large
facility. Dr. Dreessen owns the entire building as
well as a gravel parking lot located 3 doors west of
the existing location. The Development Code requires
the parking lot to be paved and with that requirement
also comes the need to control storm water. The
Page 6 - January 16, 1990
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Busse,
seconded 'by Trustee Floros, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4136
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for
for passage of Ordinance No. 4136
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1201 ARDYCE LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 66 -SU -89 &
ZBA 66 -SU -89 and ZBA 67-V-89, 1500 S. Elmhurst Rd.
ZBA 67-V-89
An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
1500 S.ELMHURST
amend the Planned Unit Development governing the
VENTURE STORE
Venture Store located at 1500 South Elmhurst Road. The
Ordinance includes an amendment to create 2 new
outlots, which will include 2 fast food restaurants,
one of which will be a Kentucky Fried Chicken; an
expansion to the existing Venture Store building with
a 20,000 square foot addition at the north side of the
building, to allow a 20 foot parking lot setback,
instead of the required 30 feet along Elmhurst and
Dempster and a zero foot parking lot setback instead
of the required 20 feet on the west and north property
lines. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 6-0.
It was noted that the Ordinance also addresses a
Restrictive Covenant requiring the installation of
specified public improvements.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at
the next regular meeting of the Village Board on
February 6, 1990.
NEW BUSINESS
MT. PLAINES Mt. Plaines Animal Hospital, 888 E. Northwest Highway
ANIMAL HOSPITAL Dr. Dreessen, owner and operator of this animal
888 E.NORTHWEST hospital, and his attorney Timothy Murphy, presented
HIGHWAY a request to waive specified requirements of the
Development Code (Chapter 16).
It was noted that Dr. Dreessen had requested, and was
granted, variations from the Zoning Ordinance necessary
to move the existing business next door to a large
facility. Dr. Dreessen owns the entire building as
well as a gravel parking lot located 3 doors west of
the existing location. The Development Code requires
the parking lot to be paved and with that requirement
also comes the need to control storm water. The
Page 6 - January 16, 1990
request is to waive the requirement to install
storm water controls that would add between $33,000
and $45,000 to the project. The Petitioner also
requests that the requirement for curb and gutters
around the perimeter of the parking lot be waived
and that the requirement to reduce the 10 feet
wide sidewalk on Northwest to 7 feet in order to
provide for parkway trees also be waived. The Plan
Commission had considered these requests and
recommended denial.
It was stated that businesses along Northwest Highway
have an advantage due to the exposure and that
planting trees would screen the businesses from
motorists on that highway.
Mr. Murphy proposed that the parking lot be constructed
in such a fashion as to detain storm water, somewhat in
a bowl shape, with appropriate sloping so that the
water would be released gradually towards the alley which
in turn directs the water to a storm water main on
George Street. It was also suggested that cut-outs be
permitted in the 10 foot wide sidewalk to permit trees
to be planted, rather than remove the entire sidewalk.
It was noted by Mr. Murphy that if the animal hospital
remained in its present location and a new tenant
occupied the vacant building none of these improvements
or expenses would be required.
Following discussion members of the Village Board
expressed their interest in providing appropriate
storm water control for the parking lot. There was
also support for the proposal to provide cut-outs in
the sidewalk and have trees installed surrounded by
grates.
An ordinance will be presented for consideration at
the next regular meeting of the Village Board on
February 6, 1990.
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH. 12
amend Chapter 12, Food Code, of the Village Code,
in its
FOOD CODE
entirety which brings local regulations into
conformance with State Statutes.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
ORD.NO. 4137
for passage of Ordinance No. 4137
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 ENTITLED
"FOOD CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND. CH. 18
would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) relative to
HANDICAPPED
parking spaces for handicapped individuals
PARKING
Page 7 - January 16, 1990
and increasing the fines from $50 to $100. This
amendment would bring local regulations into
conformance with State law.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO- 4138 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4JL38
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC
CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
FOREST RIVER A Resolution Was presented that would authorize
FIRE PROTECTION execution of the annual agreement between the Village
DISTRICT and the Forest River Fire Protection District for
emergency services for calendar year 1990.
RES.NC. 4-90 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 4-90
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE AND FOREST
RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 8 —January 16, 1990
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PUBLIC WORKS
MUTUAL AID:
A Resolution was presented that would re -affirm the
Village's participation in the
EMERGENCY &
Northwest Municipal
Conferences Mutual Aid program with Public Works
PLANNED
departments in emergency situations.
RES.NO. 2-90
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 2-90
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING EMERGENCY AID IN
PUBLIC WORKS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
RES.NO. 3-90
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 3-90
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING OF PLANNED MUTUAL AID
PROGRAM FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FOREST RIVER A Resolution Was presented that would authorize
FIRE PROTECTION execution of the annual agreement between the Village
DISTRICT and the Forest River Fire Protection District for
emergency services for calendar year 1990.
RES.NC. 4-90 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 4-90
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE AND FOREST
RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 8 —January 16, 1990
A Resolution was presented that would authorize a LEASE:
lease between the Village and Francis Cadillac 11 S. PINE ST
for Village owned property located at 11 S. Pine
Street, which is the former site of the Public
Works facility.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, RES.NO.5-90
moved for passage of Resolution No. 5-90
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING*EXECUTION OF A
LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AND FRANCIS CADILLAC FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 11 S PINE STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE X"AGERIS REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented an BUDGET
Ordinance for second reading that would amend AMENDMENTS
the Village budget for fiscal year 1989/90.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved ORD.NO.4139
for passage of Ordinance No. 4139
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1989/90 BUDGET
FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
David Jepson, Director of Finance, presented a INSURANCE
request to authorize retaining a claims administrator. CLAIMS
Mr. Jepson noted that Gallagher Bassett Insurance ADMINISTRATOR
Services has provided the administrative services
which includes reviewing claims, determining
compensation, and Processing payments for all
Village insurances except employee medical.
Gallagher Bassett has notified the Village that
they will not longer provide these services and
Mr- Jepson presented the following proposals
from other administrators:
GAB Business Services $18,450
James Management Services $18,000
Toplis and Harding, Inc. $18,600
Having reviewed the proposals and the needs of
the Village it is the recommendation of the Village's
insurance consultant and administration to retain GAB
Business Services to conduct the services of claims
administrator.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to GAB BUSINESS
concur with the recommendation of the administration SERVICES
and authorize execution of a service agreement with
GAB Business Services to provide the services of a
claims administrator for the Village.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 9 - January 16, 1990
PUBLIC SAFETY
Mr. Dixon requested authorization to retain Donohue and
BUILDING STUDY
Associates at a cost of $8,200 to provide an addendum
to their Public Safety Facility space utilization study
of November 30, 1989 to add an option for a minimal
remodeling project and include an itemization of the
various cost components
DONOHUE & ASSOC.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
authorize Donohue and Associates to prepare an
additional report on the Public Safety Building
relative to remodeling, replacing or relocating that
facility, the cost of such addendum report shall not
exceed $8,200.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PUBLIC SAFETY
Also presented was a authorization to request proposals
BUILDING:
for a facilitator who would make suggestions and
FACILITATOR
recommendations relative to the replacement or
relocation of the Public Safety Building.
Trustee Arthur expressed his opinion that the Village
Board and staff can 'make decisions relative to the
Public Safety Building and does not support the
proposal to hire a facilitator to provide that service.
It was noted that the motion would be to request
proposals for a facilitator and that a final
determination would be made when those proposals are
received.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
authorize the administration to solicit proposals to
prepare a strategic plan to identify options for
downtown development in conjunction with the
rehabilitation or relocation of the Public Safety
Building.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem
Nays: Arthur
Motion carried.
SOIL BORING
The following quotes were received for the 1990
resurfacing and reconstruction program relative to soil
borings and cores:
Soil & Material Consultants, Inc. $ 6,425.00
H.H. Holmes Testing Laboratories $ 7,616.00
Testing Service Corporation $11,091.60
It was the recommendation of administration that the
Soil & Material Consultants, Inc. be retained to
provide soil borings and cores in an amount not to
exceed $8,000.
SOIL & MATERIAL
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
CONSULTANTS,INC.
to authorize Soil & Material Consultants, Inc. to
perform the soil boring and core services in
conjunction with the 1990 resurfacing program at a cost
not to exceed $8,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem.
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 10 - January 16, 1990
A Resolution was presented that would authorize the
appropriation of Motor Fuel Tax Funds in the amount
Of $8,000 to fund the soil boring and core testing
for the 1990 resurfacing program.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee van Geem, moved
or Passage of Resolution No. 6-90
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented by the Public Works Director
to waive the bidding procedure and authorize a
consultant to study the operation and maintenance
procedures and schedules for equipment maintenance.
It was noted that new equipment which was installed in
conjunction with the construction of the new Public
Works facility was under warranty, however that
period has lapsed on most of the equipment. There
are special maintenance manuals, schedules, etc. and
since Fleet Maintenance Consultants was responsible
for that phase of the new facility since they have
all the information, it is the recommendation of
administration that they be retained to prepare a
master schedule for preventative maintenance at a
cost not to exceed $9,881.00.
Trustee Corcoran expressed his opinion that staff
should be able to provide this type of service.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to waive the bidding Procedure and authorize
Fleet Maintenance Consultants to prepare a master
schedule for the maintenance of equipment in the
Public Works Facility at a cost not to exceed
$9,881.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Hays: Corcoran
Motion carried.
A request was presented to authorize the Village to
reimburse the Frediani Group for the cost incurred
with construction of 11 parking spaces in and around
the Colony Country Townhomes on Picadilly Circle.
It was noted that the Consent Decree governing this
development specified that the costs incurred by the
development for the installation of these parking
spaces was to be reimbursed by the Village. The
cost is $7,970.85.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to authorize an expenditure of $7,970.85 as
reimbursement to the Frediani Group for installing 11
parking spaces in and around the Colony country
Townhomes on Picadilly within the Old Orchard Colony
development.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 11 - January 16, 1990
MFT FUNDS
RES.NO- 6-90
PUBLIC WORKS
EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE
FLEET
MAINTENANCE
CONSULTANTS
OLD ORCHARD
COLONY
FREDIANI
TOWNHOMES
CITIZENS Village Manager Dixon noted that he had distributed
UTILITIES WATER the study on the proposal to purchase Citizens STUDY
water system. This subject will be discussed at the Committee
of the Whole meeting on January 23rd.
1990/91 BUDGET Mr. Dixon also noted that the 1990/91 budget is being
prepared and will be presented to the Village Board,
during open hearings beginning next month.
25-31 S. MAIN ST The building occupied by V & G Printing at 25 - 31
VILLAGE PROPERTY South Main Street, being village owned property, will
be vacated by V & G Printing by the end of January.
They have consolidated their operation in their new
location at Prospect Avenue and School Street. The
vacant building on Main Street will be demolished later
in the year.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:02 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 12 - January 16, 1990
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989
Debt Service Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit. Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
January 31, 1990
Cash & Invest. Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest.
Balance 1/12/90 Through Per Attached Journal Balance
1/11/90 1/31/90 List. of Bills Entry 1/31/90
$ 1,610,097
$ 854,865
$ 519,472
$ 1,945,490(
355,207
80,406
38,548
397,066
4,753
17,995
4,018
18,730
9,685
10,851
20,089
447
2,793,619
203,454
286,459
2,710,614
226,250
8,816
2,353
232,713
1,156,273
24,557
157,291
1,023,539
614,226
-
26,980
587,247
318,435
1,500
-
319,935
3,435
-
-
3,435
590,347
12,600
122
602,823
9,522
3,453
-
12,975
1,427,836
103,562
153,843
1,377,555
14,123,407
157,897
43,067
14,238,237
16,018,484
177,062
43,091
16,152,455
284,119
-
-
284,119
$39,545,695
$1,657,018
$295,333 -0-
$39,907.380
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARIN= ACCOUNTS
ACCURATE PUMP & TANK
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
AEHI
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
ALPINE IRRIGATION
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
ALPS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
DIMITRI ARGOE
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
THOMAS ARNISON
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$47,88
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.62
$52.
EDWARD BARTMAN
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.611
JUDY BOWER
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.56
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.44
$5.00
BRENNAN'S SEWER
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$36.48
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$3.52
$40.00
CAMPBELL HOMES
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
CITIBANK, N.A.
PMT -INS CLAIMS -GAB
$10,000.00
$10,000.00*
CITY TANK & PUMP
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PMT P/R 1/25
$224.25
$224.25*
COLLAR ELECTRIC CORP.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$200.00
THOMAS CONRAD
PROSPECT MEADOWS REFUND
$477.21
$477.21
COURTESY HOME CENTER
MTCE BOND REFUND
$836.00
$836.00*
JUANITA DAVIS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 1-25-90
$32,381.98
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 1-25-90
$344,329.85
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 1-25-90
$2,041.91
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 1-25-90
$459.79
$379,213.53*
EVERSON ROSS COMPANY
SHIRT STARS
$276.65
$276.65
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PRO
FED DEP PAY 1/11
$9,962.82
FED DEP PAY 1/11
$118.08
FED DEP PAY 1/11
$46.24
FED DEP PAY 1/11
$3,790.18
FED DEP PAY 1/11
$857,21
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/25
$2,477.22
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/25
$741.38
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/25
$156.21
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/25
$35.17
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1131/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
PACE
TOTAL
$28,310.98*
$833.32
$477.21
$20.00
$425.00
$477.21
$477.;
$102.(.
$50.00
$75.00
$76,815.00
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/25
510,126.41
FLORENZ, INC.
LIQUOR LICENSE REFUND
$833.32
JOHN D. FRONTZAK, JR.
PROSPECT MEADWOS REFUND
$477.21
GECC/GECAL/CREATIVE CREDIT
REFUND PARKING TICKET
$20.00
GEORGE GYROS
BOND REFUND
$425.00
RONALD 0. GONZALEZ
PROSPECT MEADOW REFUND
$477.21
ROBERT J. HAACK
PROSPECT MEADOW REFUND
$477,21
JOHN HAAS
REFUND TRANSFER STAMP 112518
5102.00
DUANE R. HENNEMAN
BOND REFUND
$50.00
HERITAGE PLUMBING
BOND REFUND
$75.00
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
INSURANCE PREMIUMS
$76,815.00
HOFFMAN GROUP
BOND REFUND
$.00
$336060
BOND REFUND
$50.04
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$360.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$360.00
BOND REFUND
$1,310.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
C2795/2793 REFUND
$100.00
C2795/2793 REFUND
$1,310.00
BOND REFUND
$1,310.00
BOND REFUND
S75.00
BOND REFUND
$360.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
BOND REFUND
$560.00
BOND REFUND
$25.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$1,310.00
BOND REFUND
$1,310.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$1,310.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$1,600.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
PACE
TOTAL
$28,310.98*
$833.32
$477.21
$20.00
$425.00
$477.21
$477.;
$102.(.
$50.00
$75.00
$76,815.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
EVERT HOGLUND
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCI
EDWARD A. JAMES
JON CONSTRUCTION
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
DENNIS KREZMINSKI
PAUL LEONHARDT
LINCOLN ATRIUM MANAGEMENT CO.
CAROL LONCAR
JOSEPHINE LUDWIG
MAC BLDG. CORP.
J.J.M. MCCARTHY
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
MUELLERMIST IRRIGATION CO.
R. NAEGELE
O.H. MATERIALS
WALTER M. OBRIKAT
OPUS
PATIO ENCLOSURES INC.
DENNIS M. PAWLAK -
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
PERFECT TEMP. CONTROL
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE. 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1131/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOND REFUND
$360.00
BOND REFUND
$1,000.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$13,845.00
PROSPECT MEADOWS REFUND
$477.21
$477.21
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
PROSPECT MEADOWS REFUND
$477.21
$477.(
BOND REFUND
$475.00
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$975.00
PMT PR 1/25
$254.00
$254.00*
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$20.52
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.98
$22.50
PROSPECT MEADOWS REFUND
$477.21
$477.21
REFUND NUISANCE ABATEMENT
$15,385.15
$15,385.15
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$9.85
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.90
510.75
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$10p.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
PPRT-1ST ALLOC 90
$1,849.34
$1,849.34*
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.0
PROSPECT MEADOWS REFUND
$477.21
$477.
BOND REFUND
$475.00
BOND REFUND
$330.00
BOND REFUND
$425.00
BOND REFUND
$1.09,949.00
BOND REFUND
$500.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$111,779.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
PROSPECT MEADOWS REFUND
$477.21
$477.21
JAN POLICE PENSION DISB
$43,066.88
JAN FIRE PENSION DISB
543,091.48
$86,158.36*
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
MISC EXPENSES
$70.00
$70.00*
TVIOI INRONV aOIOANI NOIIdIHOSHQ dSVHOHIld
06/I£/T aIVQ INaNIVd
IHOdHH 1VAOHddV d'IflVAVd SINIlOOOV
V HJVd IOHdSOHd INOON dO HOV`I'IIA
IOHdSOHd INIlON dO HOV'I'IIA
SaNV'I QHIfiHHQNIlHI
X)MVHI aOf
HONHMS 'H HHISHHO
NOIIVOINIINNOO NVAI'I'IIlS
HOV'IVd NOIS HHI
IIOOS QNV'IOH
OIHIOa'Id IIOOs
'QI7 `INSWdO'IHAHQ 21VGSHVDS
ONI SHIOHHNH QIIlbI7 'Idfid 'IV.IOH
VSOH NONHZ
HOfIVHaQOH OIAVQ
NHISICS SHNH
'dHOO NOIONINHH HHZ
NOHISNHVIlb 'H J.HdflOH
'ISNOO DOS
'ISNOO QOOMHNId
SHHQ'IIfIH aOHHId
HaddHdd 'a 'd
SINIlOOOV ONIHVH'IO
HOQNaA
00'SL$
dad
NOIIOHdSNIHH
00'05$
dad
NOIIOHdSNIdH
00'SZ$
dad
NOIIOHdSNIHH
00'05$
HHd
NOIIOHdSNIHH
00'SZ$
HHd
NOIIOadSNIaH
00'OSI$
HHd
NOIIOHdSNIHH
00'SZ$
Hdd
NOIIOddSNIHH
00'SZ$
ddd
NOIIOddSNIHH
00'Si$
Had
NOIIOHdSNIHH
00'05$
Hdd
NOIIOadSNIHH
00'SZ$
HHd
NOIIOHdSNIaH
00'SL$
HHd
NOIIOHdSNIHH
)'O05$
00'OOS$
QNIlddH ON09
00'SLL$
00'SZ$
QNfidHH QN08
OO'OSL$
QNI1dHH QNOU
os *Z$
ZZ'$
V119 HHIVM
'IVNId QNIlddH
8Z'Z$
7119 IMVM
IVNId QNIlddH
00'SL$
00'51$
IW7CVdHaAO
OI I Sfifl
001001$
00'OOT $
QNIlddH ONOH
00'001$
00'001$
QNnASW QNOH
00'001$
00'001$
QNIIAHH ONOB
00'OOL`£$
00'009`£$
QNIlddH QNOR
00'OOT$
QNIlddH QNOB
Li'Z08`LI$
V6'869`8$
'Iafld
£Z'£OI `6$
land
IZ'LLV$
IZ'LLV$
QNfidHH SMOQVaN
ZOHdSOHd
LS'ZZ$
LS'ZZ$
BIHINOO
SNI HI'IH QdH
*00'000`£5
00'000`£$
gONVAQV
HdIHN HOVISOd
l'OOT$
00'001$
QNnARS ONOH
0'001$
00'001$
QNIlddH ON09
00'SL$
00'51$
QNIlddH QNOU
00'001$
00.001$
ONfidHH QNOO
00'SLI$
001001$
(INfidaH ONOH
OO'SL$
QNIlddH ONOH
OS'LZI$
ZZ'1I$
'1119 HHIVM
'IVNIA QNnAR11
8Z'9TI$
7'IIU HHIVM
'IVNId QNIlddH
TVIOI INRONV aOIOANI NOIIdIHOSHQ dSVHOHIld
06/I£/T aIVQ INaNIVd
IHOdHH 1VAOHddV d'IflVAVd SINIlOOOV
V HJVd IOHdSOHd INOON dO HOV`I'IIA
IOHdSOHd INIlON dO HOV'I'IIA
SaNV'I QHIfiHHQNIlHI
X)MVHI aOf
HONHMS 'H HHISHHO
NOIIVOINIINNOO NVAI'I'IIlS
HOV'IVd NOIS HHI
IIOOS QNV'IOH
OIHIOa'Id IIOOs
'QI7 `INSWdO'IHAHQ 21VGSHVDS
ONI SHIOHHNH QIIlbI7 'Idfid 'IV.IOH
VSOH NONHZ
HOfIVHaQOH OIAVQ
NHISICS SHNH
'dHOO NOIONINHH HHZ
NOHISNHVIlb 'H J.HdflOH
'ISNOO DOS
'ISNOO QOOMHNId
SHHQ'IIfIH aOHHId
HaddHdd 'a 'd
SINIlOOOV ONIHVH'IO
HOQNaA
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
DISTRICT 645, ROTARY INTERNAT.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A.
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SHELBY'S GOLF WAREHOUSE
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
XEROX CORP.
REGISTRATION - DIXON
CONF REGISTRATION -JEPSON
EMPL PHYSICAL
SUPPLIES
RETIREMENT GIFT
SERVICES RENDERED
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$30.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$245.00
$25.00
$82.00
$35.80
REINSPECTION
FEE
$369.98*
$50.00
$ 1 , 168.63
$141.27
REINSPECTION
FEE
$70.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$75.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$75.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$75.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
$25.00
$1,145.00
KENNETH H. WESTENDORF
PROSPECT MEADOWS
REFUND
$477.21
$477.21
L. WILLIAMS AWNING CO.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
WOLF POINT REALTY
BOND REFUND
$350.00
$350.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$763,827.38
GENERAL FUND
S369,881.92
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK
GRANT
$2,316.20
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$20,089.29
WATER & SEWER FUND
$44,159.44
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$541.20
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$86,837.57
POLICE PENSION FUND
$43,066.88
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$43,041.48
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$153,843.40
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
DISTRICT 645, ROTARY INTERNAT.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A.
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SHELBY'S GOLF WAREHOUSE
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
XEROX CORP.
REGISTRATION - DIXON
CONF REGISTRATION -JEPSON
EMPL PHYSICAL
SUPPLIES
RETIREMENT GIFT
SERVICES RENDERED
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$30.00
$30.00*
$245.00
$245.00
$82.00
$82.00
$35.80
$35.80
$369.98
$369.98*
$ 1 , 168. 63
$ 1 , 168.63
$141.27
$141.27
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31%90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $2,072.68
GENERAL FUND $2,072.68
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
BROADCASTING
SUBSCRIPTION THRU 11/90
$70.00
$70.00
CAROLYN A. MILLER
BD MTG CREW 1/23
$25.00
$25.00
MT. PROSPECT EMPLOYMENT SERVIC
TEMP SERVICES-MYSZKOWSKI
$364.00
$364.00
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
MEMBERSHIP-PASALIC
$175.00
$175.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$62.08
$62.08
OFFICE SQUARE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$207.06
$207.06
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$5.79
55.79*
APRIL RAJCZYK
BD MTG CREW 1/9
$25.00
$25.00
JERRY RAJCZYK
BD MTG CREW 1/9
$25.00
$25.00
ROSCOR CORPORATION
SERVICE
$240.00
SUPPLIES
$103.51
$343.51
FRANK SMITH
BD MTG CREW 1/16
$25.00
$25.00
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
***TOTAL**
$1,327.1
GENERAL FUND $1,327.44
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DECISION DATA SERVICE INC.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MAINTENANCE PRINTER $84.00 $84.00
NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION 3/90-2/91 $55.00 $55.00
MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER $189.00
VENDOR
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
KELLY SERVICES, INC.
MONROE SYSTEMS FOR BUSINESS, I
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PITNEY BOWES INC.
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
SHESHUNOFF INFO. SERVICES INC.
SIGNS FOR YOU
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
XEROX CORP.
XLJDATACOMP INC.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER
TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
TEMP SERVICES -FOSTER
TEMP SERVICES -FOSTER
RIBBONS
PAPER
SUPPLIES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
SOLUTION & INK
POSTAGE
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
THE BANK REPORT - JUNE 89
DATA PROCESSING SIGN
DELIVERY
DELIVERY
CHGS-1090 COPIER
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN -FEB
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
MAINTENANCE SERV -FEB
$6,084.24
PACE 7
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
$52.00
$241.00
$320.50
8320.50
$90.80
.$360.36
$451.16
$76.08
$76.08
$1,574.00
$1,574.00
$16.76
$16.
$8.85
$42.79
$19.30
$37.94
$108.88*
$73. 00
$168.00
$325.00
$566.00
$139.57
$50.56
$13.89
$204.02
$173.45
$173.45
$56.00
$56.00
$ 18.20
$11.20
$29.40
$ 1,748. 58
$201.39
$141.27
$2,091.
$36.75
$36.:7`
***TOTAL**
$6,084.24
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
THE HERALD EMPLOYMENT AD - PT CLERICAL $222.82 $222.82
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$94.49
$94.49
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$75.56
LEGAL PAGE
$70.68
LEGAL PAGE
$63.37
LEGAL PACE
$58.50
$25,517.'
RANDY CHERWIN
LEGAL PAGE
$78,00
$9.2.
HMO ILLINOIS
LEGAL PAGE
$58.50
$404.6'
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
1/18 DELIVERY
$20.60
$20.t.
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
PRESC REIMB
***TOTAL**
$742.52
GENERAL FUND
$742,52
$11.79
$11.79
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 1/23/90
$7,383.43
MEDICAL CL 1/26
$738.50
MEDICAL CLAIMS
$1,017.15
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 1/18/90
$5,208.97
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 1/30
$11,169.20
$25,517.'
RANDY CHERWIN
PRESC REIMB
$9.21
$9.2.
HMO ILLINOIS
HLTH INSURANCE -JANUARY
$6,414.89
86,414.89
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
INSURANCE PREMIUMS
$38,407.00
$38,407.00
MICHAEL J. KRUCHTEN
PRESC REIMB
$6.69
$6.69
DAVID RISTOW
PRESC REIMB
$11.79
$11.79
STATE TREASURER,EX-OFFICIO CUS
2ND INJURY FUND ASSESSMENT
$40.79
$40.79
RICHARD UGOLINI
PRESC REIMB
$33.28
$33.28
BARBARA VEMMER
PRESC REIMB
$12.80
$12.80
RISK MANAGEMENT
***TOTAL**
$70,453.70
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $70,453.70
INSPECTION SERVICES
BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC.
BROOK FURNITURE CLEARANCE CTR.
COMPUTERLAND
COURTESY HOME CENTER
ELEK-TEK, INC.
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO.
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
HEWLETT PACKARD
ILLINOIS ASSN. FOR FLOODPLAIN
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
INT. ASSOC. OF ELECTRICAL INSP
INTERTEC PUBLISHING CORP.
KARA CO., INC.
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
NORTHWEST BLDG. OFFICIALS AND
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
NOVAK & PARKER INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
QUALEX, INC.
RUBBER STAMP MAN
REF MATL
$125.00
BOCA COMMENTARY CODE/1987
$25.00
$150.Q
CHAIR
$119.00
$119.6
720K FLOPPY
$89.00
$89.00
TV CART
$39.99
$39.99
SUPPLIES
$39.00 -
FRT ON SUPPLIES
$4.26
SUPPLIES
$50,98
SUPPLIES
$40.98
$57.22
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$100.00
$100.00
STICKERS
$436.00
$436.00
CLNR FELT FIXING
$37.50
$37.50
1990 IAFSM DUES PSANKA
$20.00
1990 IAFSM DUES VANDORNICK
$20.00
$40.00
SAFETY HANDBOOK
$42.75
$42.75
COPY OF ANALYSIS OF THE 1990 NEC
$15.00
$15.00
REGISTRATION -SEMINAR FRONTZAK
$225.00
$225.00
COPY MACHINE INK
$97,82
$97.82
MEMBERSHIP & JOURN RENEWAL
$50.00
$50.'
MEMBERSHIP
$60.00
$60.0
INSPECTION SUPPLIES
$24.00
$24.00
ZENITH TV & VCR
$606.95
$606.95
MISC EXPENSES
$13.07
MISC EXPENSES
$1.30
MISC EXPENSES
$8,00
MISC EXPENSES
$6.83
MISC EXPENSES
$29,00
$58.20*
FILM
$29,88
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$58.59
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$45.99
$134.46
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$68.80
$68.80
VE ilDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
SUBURBAN BUILDING OFFICIALS CO
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
TELEDYNE POST
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, L
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
WESTERN WOOD PRODUCTS ASSOC.
JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC.
XEROX CORP.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$30.00
$30.00
BOOKCASE
$174.40
$174.40
SUBSCRIPTION
$8.00
$8.00
DRAFTING FILM
$268.60
$268.60
ELEV INSPECTION
$25.00
ELEV INSPECTION
$25.00
ELEV REINSP
$275.00
$325.x'
CENTRAL RD IMPROVEMENT
$14,830.81
$14,830.L_
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$163.53
$163.53
TRAINING VIDEOS
$25.00
REFERENCE MATERIAL
.57.33
$32.33
COPY BERNSTEIN BRAINS
$22.98
$22.98
MTCE SERVICE RENEWAL
$36.90
MTCE SERVICE RENEWAL
S133.00
MTCE SERVTCE RENEWAL
$29.60
MTCE AGREEMENT 2510 COPIER
$68.75
MTCE AGREEMENT 1035 COPIER
$137.00
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN -FEB
$201.38
$606.63
MAINTENANCE SERV -FEB
$36.75
$36.75
$18,950.72
***TOTAL** $18,950.72
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
PARTS
MISC TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
MISC LOCK REPAIRS & KEYS
MISC LOCK REPAIRS & KEYS
$28.92
$81.48
$303.54
$39.38
$182.52
$78.00
$453.32
t
VENDOR
POLICE bEPARTMENT
ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
BROADCAST MEDIA, INC.
BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, IN
CANON USA
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPUTERLAND
THE CONSTABLE EQUIPMENT CO.
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
THOMAS F. DALEY
MICHAEL E. FELTEN
ROBERT GIBSON
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
GOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL TESTING
MICHAEL J. GOY
GRAPHIC SPECIALTIES, INC
JOHN GROSS
H R HART PHOTO
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS COALITION FOR SAFETY
INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF CHIEFS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REPLACE LOCK
$264.64
$525.16
SUPPLIES
$102.07
$102.07
MISC HDWARE-DEC 89
$241.55
MISC HDWARE DEC 89
$20.56
$262.11
EVIDENCE LABELS
$29.10
$29.10
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$104.00
$104.00
REPAIR CAMERA
$154.60
$154.
BH66-JT-5422-A
$11.60
$11.
IBM 5.25 DISK DRIVE
$375.00
$375.00
SWITCHES
$107.50
SUPPLIES
$35.50
SUPPLIES
$343.50
BATTERIES
$68.00
$554.50
MAILING ENVELOPES
$78.98
$78.98
EXPENSES
$268.59
$268.59
EXPENSES
$12.00
$12.00
EXPENSES
$15.22
$15.22
FRONT END ALIGN
$39.00
TIRES
$504.00
TIRES
$504.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
P-6 ALIGNMENT
$39.00
$1,242.L
CSO EXAMS
$225.00
$225.00
EXPENSES
$18.00
$18.00
PRINTER PAPER
$296,50
$296.50
SEMINAR 1/16 EXPENSES
$8.50
$8.50
FILM PROCESSING DEC 89
$55.85
$55.85
SERVICE AGREEMENTS
$414.28
$414.28
061 9 15 G
$37.83
828 9 15 G
$30.63
750 9 15 G
$134.09
$202.55
SEMINAR-ROSCOP, DAHLBERG
$30.00
$30.00*
IACP POLICY RESEARCH PUBLICATION
$6.95
$6.95
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
KALE UNIFORMS
KETCH -ALL COMPANY
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LEARNKEY
LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC.
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
LITTLE AMERICA
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY
M.A.D. HOUSE
MAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE
THOMAS F. MCGUIRE & ASSOCIATES
METROMEDIA PAGING SERVICES
MINUTEMAN PRESS
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY
NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAI
NORTH SUB. ASSOC. OF CHIEFS OF
NORTHEASTERN METROPOLITAN ENF.
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
JACKET-BRESNAHAN
$116.73
UNIFORMS
$24.95
$141.68
SUPPLIES
$27.76
$27.76
MISC AUTO PARTS DEC 89
$940.26
$940.26
VIDEO
$99.95
$99.95
FILM
$ 111. 18
$111.18
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$37.90
CAMERA SUPPLIES
$84.95
$122.t_
PRISONER FOOD DEC 89
$147.60
$147.60
SUPPLIES
$50.46
SUPPLIES
$50,00
SUPPLIES
$50.00
SUPPLIES
$50.00
SUPPLIES
$58.53
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$58.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$58.37
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$58.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$58.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$41.26
$533.70
SUPPLIES
$57.08
$57.08
BOOKLETS - DRUGS
$33.75
$33.75
BODY REPAIRS
$405.00
$405.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$120.00
$120.On
PAGER RENTAL
$409.50
$409.
LETTERHEAD
$52.60
$52.60
CAR RENTAL - JAN
$100.00
$100.00
MISC AUTO PARTS -DEC 89
$292.93
$292.93
SUPPLIES
$4,29
SUPPLIES
$6.00
$15.29
SEMINAR -B FELTEN, RANDOLPH
$60.00
SEMINAR -GOY, GROSS
$70.00
TUITION
$40.00
$170.00
PAVLOCK(DALEY
$40.00
$40.00
SEMINAR - GARCIA
$100.00
$100.00
PHYSICALS - 14
$2,730.00
$2,730.00
PAPER
$707.50
$707.50
GENERAL FUND
$17,870.86
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADVANCED COMMAND SYSTEMS SOFTWARE PROGRAM $695.00 $695.00
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION SERVICE $29.23 $29.23
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC LINEN SERVICE $92.52
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
PAVLOCK/DALEYJRICHARDSON
$60.00
TUITION - BESTHOFF, SMITH, NELSON
$300.00
$368.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$45.42
SUPPLIES
$11.18
$56.60
PADGETT-THOMPSON
REGISTRATION
$198.00
$198.00
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$45.50
$45.50*
ERIC E. PIEE
MISC RADIO REPAIRS
$1,059.50
$1,059.
POST BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
HEAD SETS -TRANSCRIBER
$44.10
$44.
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
STRAYS -DEC 89
$210.00
$210.00
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
PRINTING SERVICE
$54.05
PRINTING SERVICE
$92,60
PRINTING CHG
$167.25
$313.90
SAVE -A -PET
STRAYS -DEC 89
$140.00
$140.00
SECRETARY OF STATE
RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
$96.00
$96.00
SKILLPATH, INC.
SEMINAR-DALEY
$99.00
$99.00
SOMAR ENTERPRISES
SUPPLIES
$1,184.00
$1,1 .00
TCI OF ILLINOIS
CABLE -POLICE
$9.00
$9
$9.00
$9
TRADE MARK GRAPHICS, INC.
SUPPLIES
$196.00
$196.00
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
TUITION-GIBSON, EDWARDS
$250.00
$250.00
V & G PRINTERS INC.
BUS CARDS
$68.00
$68.00
XLJDATACOMP INC.
MAINTENANCE SERV -FEB
$36.75
$36.75
YUSUF ARMS AND AMMUNITION
AMMUNITION
$700.00
$700.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$17,870.:
GENERAL FUND
$17,870.86
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADVANCED COMMAND SYSTEMS SOFTWARE PROGRAM $695.00 $695.00
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION SERVICE $29.23 $29.23
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC LINEN SERVICE $92.52
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
BRUCO BATTERY CO.
BURKE AUDIO VISUAL SERVICE
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
CENTURY SUPPLY COMPANY
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE,
THE CHICAGO DAILY DEFENDER
W. S. DARLEY COMPANY
DYNODEX PORTFOLIO SYSTEMS, INC
EMERGE A STAR
GFE, INC
GROVE OFFICE MACHINES
H R HART PHOTO
HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
HARPER COLLEGE BOOKSTORE
THE HERALD
TONY HUEMANN
IGE, INCORPORATED
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOC.
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS SECR.ASSN
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGH
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
LINEN SERVICE
$119.83
LINEN SERVICE
$147.76
S360.11
PARTS
$41.72
$41.72
BATTERY
$141.94
$141.94
REPAIRS
$73.75
$73.75
DONUTS-HA7, MAT CLASS
$81.00
$81.00
TILE -STATION 14
$1,628.37
$1,628.-
RADIO REPAIR
$395.00
$395.(,_
AD
$128.70
$128.70
TURN OUT GEAR
$5,430.00
$5,430.00
DYNODEX PKG MAC
$99.00
$99.00
NEW RECHASSIS PMT
$7,875.45
$7,875.45*
COMPOUND GAUGE ASHCROFT
$25.89
$25.89
REPAIR TYPEWRITER
$78,00
$78,00
SUPPLIES
$180.64
$180.64
PAINT SUPPLIES
$39.95
PAINT SUPPLIES
$90.98
8130.93
SERVICE AGREEMENTS
$163.27
$163.27
HSL 110 TEXT BOOKS
$98.70
$98.70
EMF AD
$203.15
$203.15
EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.00
OXYGEN
$18.00
OXYGEN TANKS
$59.02
$77.0?
424 9 15 G
$ 189.23
113 9 15 G
$75.08
061 9 15 G
$37.82
575 9 15 G
$412,98
244 9 15 G
$26.70
244 9 15 G
$22.48
$764.29
MEMBERSHIP-ULREICH, CAVELLO
$90.00
DUES - JACKSON
$30.00
$120.00
MEMBERSHIP PEYTON
$10.00
$10.00
REGISTRATION - JACKSON
$300.00
BOOKS
$583.00
$883.00
CALENDARS
$12.00
$12.00
SERVICE PHONE SYSTEM
$175.50
$175.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
KALE UNIFORMS
COLLAR PINS
$111.20
CAP
$26.95
$138.15
KAR PRODUCTS INC
SUPPLIES
$9.52 -
SUPPLIES
$172.79
$163.27
KINNEY SHOE CORPORATION
GYM SHOES
$715,28
$715.28
MICHAEL KLEES
SUPPLIES
$37.69
$37.69
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
GAS TANK & CABLE
$268.28
$268.'
LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC.
SUPPLIES
$173.60
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$32.90
$206.50
CHARLES LIVINGSTON
EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.00
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
ACCT BOOKS
$30.21
BINDERS
$57.28
$87.49
M & R RADIATOR INC.
PARTS
$83.64
PARTS
$50.64
8134.28
MACWORLD
SUBSCRIPTION
$ 17.97
$17.97
JOHN MALCOLM - F.D.
EXPENSES
$50.00
EXPENSES-MALCOLM
$108.90
$158.90
MANAS TORCOM
CARPET CLEANING
$270.00
$270.00
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
$651.73
AUTO B P MONITOR
$1,700.90
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
$653.23
$3,005.86
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
TONER-ET3120
$137.82
TONER
$69.56
$207.38
ERIC MONSEN
EXP ADVANCE
$862.80
$862.x'
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
PARTS
$110.00
PARTS
$360.00
$470.00
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
CELLULAR SERVICE
$36.50
$36.50
MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO EQUIPMENT
$1,099.77
RADIO EQUIPMENT
$43.47
RADIO EQUIPMENT
$85.48
$1,228.72
MYCARD PHOTO I.D. PRODUCTS
ID SUPPLIES
$41.50
$41.50
NAPA AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$16.25
PARTS
$20.39
$36.64
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
MISC REPAIR PARTS
$745.19
$745.19
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL CORDS
$25.56
$25.56
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PAPER
$707.50
$707.50
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEFT.
NORTHWEST REGIONAL TRAINING GO
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PHYSIO -CONTROL
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
QUALEX, INC.
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
RICHARD STRUIF
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
U. S. AUTO GLASS CENTER, INC.
U.S. FIRE SPRINKLER REPORTER
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBA
V & G PRINTERS INC.
PAUL VALENTINE
XL/DATACOMP INC.
RAYMOND YOUNG
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
1990 DUES
$65.00
$65.00
SUPPLIES
$6.32
$6.32
LIFE PAC BATTERIES
$413.56
LIFE PAK 10
$7,778.50
$8,192.06
REPAIR PARTS
$65.43
$65.43
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$144.53
$144.53
SUPPLIES
$15.39
$15."
PRINTING CHARGE
$225.10
$225.1.,
EXPENSES
$538.00
$538.00
SUPPLIES
$3.61
$3.61
WELDING SUPPLIES
$22,72
WELDING SUPPLIES
$75,60
WELDING SUPP
$61.30
$159.62
DRAWERS
$34.60
$34.60
INSTALL WINDSHIELD
$223.30
$223.30
SUBSCRIPTION
$48.00
$48.00
TRAINING-ACKERMAN
$25.00
$25.00
PRINTING CHARGE
$537.00
$537.00
EXPENSES
$22.00
$22.00
MAINTENANCE SERV -FEB
$36.75
$36.75
EXPENSES
$10.25
$10.25
***TOTAL** $39,919.OR
$24,715.26 CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $15,203.82
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
SERVICES RENDERED -FEBRUARY
$31,385.00 531,385.00
***TOTAL** $31,385.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $31,385.00
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 339 9 3G S $26,98- $26.98
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $21.00
MISC EXPENSES $60.09 $81.(
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ***TOTAL** $108.07
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
$108.07
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
ELECTRICAL SERVICE
$1,125.00
$1,125.00
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
DUES-BEDNAR
$98.00
$98.00
MICHAEL J. MORAN
SERVICES RENDERED
$50.00
$50.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$11.32
MISC EXPENSES
$28,88
$40
WHEELING GLASS COMPANY
HOME WEATHERIZATION SUBSIDY
$527.27
$527,.
XEROX CORP.
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$141.28
$141.28
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$1,981.75
GENERAL FUND
$279.48 COMMUNITY
DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$1,702.27
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
MISC BLDG
SUPPLIES
- DEC
$98.39
MISC BLDG
SUPPLIES
- DEC
$30.73
MISC BLDG
SUPPLIES
- DEC
$55.27
MISC BLDG
SUPPLIES
- DEC
$56.81
MISC BLDG
SUPPLIES
- DEC
$24.06
MISC BLDG
SUPPLIES
- DEC
$13.95
MISC BLDG
SUPPLIES
- DEC
$174.46
$453.6-
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$68.54
PARTS
$41.25
PARTS
$55.69
MISC TRUCK
PARTS
$24.09
MISC TRUCK
PARTS
$19.50
MISC TRUCK
PARTS
$17.29
SUPPLIES
$110,28
SUPPLIES
$73,80
SUPPLIES
$38.80
$449.24
AKZO SALT INC.
ROAD SALT
$2,105.67
ROAD SALT
$3,024.45
ROAD SALT
$1,036.57
ROAD SALT
$3,559.33
ROAD SALT
$3,999.85
ROAD SALT
$2,594.12
ROAD SALT
$2,527.10
ROAD SALT
$5,135.98
ROAD SALT
$4,007.66
$27,990./1
ALEXIAN BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTE
HLTH SCREENINGS
$975.00
$975.00
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
ASPHALT
$397.80
$397.80
AM= -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
LATCH ASSYS
$45.98
SUPPLIES
$166.85
SUPPLIES
$181.89
SUPPLIES
$278.77
$673.49
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL
CLOTHING
$213.45
$213.45
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
KEYS
$43.05
$43.05
ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$41.40
PARTS
$21.95
$63.35
BENNETT COMPANIES, INC.
SUPPLIES
$289.95
$289.95
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
STREET DIVISION
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
CADE INDUSTRIES
CECO DOOR DIVISION
CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY HODS
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CHICAGO TURF & IRRIGATION
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONRAD AND SON
R. L. CORTY & COMPANY
COURTESY HOME CENTER
THOMAS CRAMER
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
DREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS, IN
MISC HDWARE-DEC 89
MISC HDWARE DEC 89
FITTINGS
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
SERVICES RENDERED
REPAIR DOOR
REPAIR DOOR
SERVICE - MOTOR
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
DOORS
CEILING TILE SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
WATER USAGE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
CLEANING SERVICE
ENERY CHARGE BF80-JT-17006
SUPPLIES
RELIEF VALVE
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
CONTR SNOW REMOVAL
CONSULTING SERVICES
MOTOR
MOTOR
INVOICE AMOUNT
$241.54
$278.89
$69.85
$79.60
$58.50
$52.00
$52.00
$472. 56
$275.88
$266. 50
$457.50
$457.50
$405. 60
$ 131. 60
$431. 32
$63. 52
$74. 39
$24.85
$38. 10
$81. 18
$77.80
$15.96
$82. 31
$18.80
$77.80
$14.78
$1,836.00
$ 165. 02
$76.07
$108.80
$90. 24
$15.22
$ 120.00
$2,272.14
$91.08
$6.50
PAGE 19
TOTAL
$520.43
$149.45
$635.b
$1,457.38
$405.60
$131.60
$494.84
$ 137. 34
$81. 18
$287.45
$1,836.00
$165.02
$76.07
$108.80
$105.46
$120.00
$2,272. 14
$97.58
VEI,DOR
STREET DIVISION
EARNIESJIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN
MICHAEL FIGOLAH
THE FILE MART
FINISHMASTER, INC.
FOREST TREE SERVICE, INC.
GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO.
GIBSON ELECTRIC CO., INC.
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
GNB, INCORPORATED
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
RAY HAMILTON
HOYLE ROAD EQUIPMENT CO.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
IBM
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK & EQUIPMENT
DAVID KANE
JIM KANE
KAR PRODUCTS INC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
TIRE & REPAIR
$48.66
$48.66
KNIFE SET
$25.00
$25.00
FILING UNITS
$387.00
$387.00
AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES
12/89
$336.68
AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES
DEC 89
$52.26
AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES
DEC 89
$42.84
AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES
DEC 89
$192.35
$624.`
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$2,364.55
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$2,787,68
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$2,339.66
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$2,289,88
TREE TRIMMING
$3,484.60
$13,266.37
WINDOW WASHING
$83.50
WINDOW WASHING
$83.50
WINDOW WASHING
$83.50
WINDOW WASHING
$83.50
WINDOW WASHING
$83.50
$417.50
INSTALL SWITCH
$1,171.00
$1,171.00
PAINT SUPPLIES
$182,21
PAINT SUPPLIES
$57.57
PAINT SUPP
$30.32
$270.10
BATTERIES
$197.25
$197.25
TIRES
$180.36
$121.3h
BULBS
$21.12
$21.
CONTR SNOW REMOVAL
$75.00
$75.Ov
EQUIP PARTS
$160.23
EQUIP PARTS
$465.81
$626.04
MAINTENANCE AGR
$13.32
MTCE AGREEMENT
$12.35
MTCE AGREEMENT
$10.77
$36.44
KEYS
$7. DO
$7.00
PRINTHEAD
$139.00
$139.00
SALT SPREADER
$411.07
$411.07
CONTR SNOW REMOVAL
$55.00
$55.00
CONTR SNOW REMOVAL
$52.50
$52.50
PARTS
$127.27
$127.27
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 21
r
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR
c
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET bIVISION
I
PHIL KUO N
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
$64.50
$64.50
LABEL MASTER
SAFETY TRAX ROLL
$43.89
$43.89
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
MISC AUTO PARTS DEC 89
$90.76
MISC AUTO PARTS DEC 89
$176.31
$267.07
LCOMP INC.
SWITCHES
$208,26
$208.26
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
MISC PAINTING SUPPLIES -DEC
89
$29.33
MISC PAINTING SUPPLIES -DEC
89
$44.15
MISC PAINTING SUPPLIES -DEC
89
$8.40
MISC PAINTING SUPPLIES -DEC
89
$10.60
$92.48
M & M RADIO LAB
LOCATOR SERVICED
$325.00
$325.00
MIDWEST LUBE, INC.
PARTS
$70.82
$70.82
MOTOROLA, INC.
RADIO EQUIPMENT
$1,236.00
RADIO EQUIPMENT
$618.00
RADIO EQUIPMENT
$1,951.00
PLUGS
$37.47
$3,842.47
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
MISC AUTO PARTS -DEC 89
$62.13
MISC AUTO PARTS -DEC 89
$274.16
$336.29
MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$15.28
SUPPLIES
$15,28
LEAK DETECTORS
$15.46
$46.02
N.H.P. SERVICE COMPANY
SERVICE
$81.00
$81.00
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
MEMBERSHIP
$10.00
$10.00
NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION
SAFETY VIDEO
$40.00
$40.00
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO.
GRATES
$516.00
$516.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1700 W CENTRAL AV
$3,697.09
1830 KENSINGTON
$875.70
$4,572.79
NORTHERN ILLINOIS HORT. ASSOC.
REGISTRATION
$100.00
$100.00*
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ELEC SUPPLIES
$37.26
ELEC SUPPLIES
$113.62
ELEC SUPPLIES
$113.61
ELEC SUPPLIES
$113.62
ELEC SUPPLIES
$3,80
ELEC SUPPLIES
$15,16
ELEC SUPPLIES
$42.87
$439.94
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$349.07
SUPPLIES
$175.08
5524.15
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
ROSS NOVY
CONTR SNOW REMOVAL
$115.00
$115.00
KEVIN O'NEAL
CONTR SNOW REMOVAL
$102.50
$102.50
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$3.30
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$46.24
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$8.16
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$24,04
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$10.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$10,47
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$67.95
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.18
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$53.49
$224.83*
PROSAFETY
EAR MUFFS
$76.73
$76.73
ROADWAY SIGNAL AND LIGHTING MA
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$1,203.30
$1,03.30
ROSEMONT BUILDING & SUPPLY CO.
SUPPLIES
$109,50
$1109.50
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Fn 1PMENT
$192.51
$192.51
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
O PPLIES
$ 0
$400.00*
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
PEST CONTROL JAN 90
$4.00
$44.00
PEST CONTROL JAN 90
$40.00
PEST CONTROL JAN 90
$40.00
PEST CONTROL JAN 94
$40.00
PEST CONTROL JAN 90
$40.00
PEST CONTROL JAN 90
$40.00
$240.00
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
TOOLS
$30.00
$30.0
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
PLBG SUPP
$293.16
PLBG SUPP
$84.53
PLBG SUPP
$41.80
$419.49
STEINER CORPORATION
HIP LENGTH JACKETS
$172.50
$172.50
TCI OF ILLINOIS
CABLE -PW
$12.75
$12.75
TEMCO MACHINERY, INC.
20 L H CURB SHOES
$438.40
$438.40
TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
CURB & GUTTER PROGRAM
$4,628.35
$4,628.35
TUFF-KOTE DINOL
RUSTPROOF DUMP BODY
$125.00
$125.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WATER & SEWER
$32.50
$32.50
W. W. SALES & LEASING CO.
LIQUID CALCIUM CHLORIDE
$1,209.94
LIQUID CALCIUM CHLORIDE
$1,243.32
$2,453.26
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
SUPPLIES
$372,98
SUPPLIES
$670.03
$1,043.01
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
WASHINGTON RUBBER CO.
WAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO.
WEARGUARD
WELDON ENGINEERING COMPANY
RANDY WERDERITCH
WOOD ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION I
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARTS
$85,80
PARTS
$24,48
531,E
PARTS
$120.00
$230.28
PARTS
$57.05
PARTS
$48.13
$105.18
CLOTHING
$113.48
$340.00
CLOTHING
$32.50
$145.f
ENG SUPPLIES
$87.80
$87.9,
CONTR SNOW•REMOVAL
$70.00
$70.00
REPAIRS
$317.07
$317.07
MTCE CONTRACT
***TOTAL**
$83,325.56
$40,972.78
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$38,547.78
$3,805.00
$257.55
$257.55
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALLEN GROUP INC.
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT
AURORA FAST FREIGHT, INC.
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BADGER METER INC
BENNETT COMPANIES, INC.
BLS ENTERPRISES, INC.
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES - DEC
$6.75
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES - DEC
$25.03
531,E
PARTS
$86.34
MISC TRUCK PARTS
$179.08
MISC TRUCK PARTS
$109.30
$374.72
REPLACEMENT PARTS
$340.00
$340.00
CLOTHING
$213.45
$213.45
MEMBERSHIP -1990
$225.00
MEMBERSHIP -1990
$300.00
$525.00
FRT CHG
$46.60
$46.60
MTCE CONTRACT
$550.00
$550.00
10 BRONZE METERS
$2,278.50
$2,278.50
WELDING SUPPLIES
$257.55
$257.55
REPAIR HYDRAULIC CYL
$626.00
$626.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 24
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND 'SEWER DIVISION
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
MISC HDWARE-DEC 89
$24155
MISC HDWARE DEC 89
$70,.74
MISC HDWARE DEC 89
$278.90
$591.19
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
$79.60
$79.60
R. I. BUSSE INC.
DIRT
$162.00
$162.00
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$275.87
$275.87
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM SERVICE
$77.81
UNIFORM SERVICE
$15.96
UNIFORM SERVICE
$82.30
UNIFORM SERVICE
$18.79
UNIFORM SERVICE
$77,81
UNIFORM SERVICE
$14.78
$287.45
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BJ80-JT-23598
$5,696.95
$5,696.95
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH67-JT-1310-A
$46.85
$46.85
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$497.93
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,567.98
SERVICES RENDERED
$224.68
$2,290.59
G C EISENHAUER & SONS INC
INSTALL BACKFLOW PREVENTERS
$3,786.00
REPIPED LINE WELL HOUSE 16
$174.00
$3,960.00
ENGINEERED COMPONENTS, INC.
T-842 T -HANDLE
$61.08
$61.08
EXECTECH MICROSYSTEMS
REPAIR PRINTER
$78.50
$78.50
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
OVERNIGHT BOXES
$92.50
$92.50
THE FILE MART
FILING UNITS
$387.00
$387.00
THE FILM LIBRARY
SAFETY FILM
$90.00
$90.(
FINISHMASTER, INC.
AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES 12/89
$336.68
AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES DEC 89
$42,84
AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES DEC 89
$192.35
$571.87
JOSEPH D. FOREMAN & CO.
PARTS
$207.28
$207.28
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
EXTINGUISHER SERV
$20.00
$20.00
GNB, INCORPORATED
BATTERIES
$197.25
$197.25
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES & TUBES
$761.88
TIRES & TUBES
$461.40
TIRES
$180.36
$1,403.64
GRAND FRAME INC.
FRAMED VILLAGE MAP
$355.03
$355.03
GREELEY AND HANSEN
CITIZENS UTILITY STUDY
$8,083.05
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$2,187.96
$10,271.01
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
WATER AND'SEWER DIVISION
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
HENRICKSEN
HOYLE ROAD EQUIPMENT CO.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
KAR PRODUCTS INC
JOEL KENNEDY CONSTRUCTION CO.
WATER METER MATERIALS
WATER SERVICE
WATER METER INSTALLATIONS
WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER MAIL
WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER MAIL
METER EXCH
METER EXCH
WATER METER MATERIALS
WATER SERVICE
WORKSTATION
EQUIP PARTS
EQUIP PARTS
MAINTENANCE AGR
MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER
MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER
MTCE AGREEMENT
MTCE AGREEMENT
424 9 15 B
455 9 15 G
068 9 15 G
660 9 15 B
774 9 15 G
013 9 15 G
210 9 15 G
044 9 82 G
153 9 15 G
575 9 15 G
303 9 3G S
575 9 15 G
338 9 15 G
155 9 15 G
PARTS
PROSPECT SEWER REHAB
INVOICE AMOUNT
$25.27
$242. 55
$240.66
$481.32
$ 111. 18
$ 125. 98
$200. 12
$ 115. 82
$103.14
$137.52
$78.94
$311.30
$1,998.34
$160.23
$465.81
$ 13. 32
$189.00
$52.00
$ 12. 35
$10.78
$30. 64
$203.83
$533. 12
$82.71
$30.63
$30.63
$61. 25
$97. 32
$ 18. 18
$16.63
$19.75
$17.53
$17.26
$17.72
$ 127. 26
$72,573.35
PAGE 25
TOTAL
$2,173.80
$1,998.34
$626.04
$277.45
$1,177.20
$127.26
$72,573.35
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
LAND AND LAKES CO
TIPPING FEES -DISPOSAL
$1,385.04
TIPPING FEES -DISPOSAL
$815.00
$2,200.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
MISC AUTO PARTS DEC 89
$507.25
$507.25
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
MISC PAINTING SUPPLIES -DEC 89
$212.15
$212.15
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
RESTORATION MATERIALS
$328.93
RESTORATION MATERIALS
$3,278.43
$3,607.36
ROGER MEYER
HAULING REFUSE DISPOSAL
$2,829.00
REP MATL-MAIN BREAKS
$2,739,24
REPAIR MATL MAIN BREAKS
$2,407.75
$7,975.99
MOHAWK STAMP COMPANY, INC.
STAMP
$12.50
$12.50
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
CELLULAR SERVICE DEC 89
$33.63
$33.63
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
MISC AUTO PARTS -DEC 89
$811.98
$811.98
NET MIDWEST, INC.
WATER ANALYSES
$65.00
$65.04
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA
$16.41
1700 W CENTRAL AV
$3,697.08
NS KENSINGTON IE RAND RD
$107.40
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
$224.03
$4,044.92
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ELEC SUPPLIES
$236.08
ELEC SUPPLIES
$19.19
ELEC SUPPLIES
$206.82
$462.09
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$87.43
$87.43
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
$24.00
$20.00
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$25.45
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$40.55
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$47.65
n
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$3.20
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$16.67
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
S17.50
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$11.94
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$23.34
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$96.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.80
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$6.11
$290.71*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
SEAT CUSHION
$99.36
PARTS
$31.94
PARTS
$71.33
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
POSTMASTER
HENRY PRATT COMPANY
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
RIC MAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
ROSETTI CONTRACTING CO., INC.
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
SOUND INCORPORATED
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
STEINER CORPORATION
TECH SYN CORPORATION
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TREASURER, STATE OF ILLINOIS
VANS ARTISTS DESIGNERS SUPPLIE
VIAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
WASHINGTON RUBBER CO.
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FED.
WEARGUARD
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 27
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARTS
$105.84
$308.47
POSTAGE -WATER BILLS
$672.22
•$672.22*
SUPPLIES
$100.00
$100.00
FILM PROCESSING
$33.00
FILM PROCESSING
$10.49
FILM PROCESSING
$9.59
FILM PROC
$15.21
$68.
KARCHER RM -55
$234.34
$234. .
SUPPLIES
$98.00
$98.00
SERVICE - WATERMAIN
$3,154.29
$3,154.29
STRAP
$20.24
$20.24
SUPPLIES
$101.45
$101.45*
CIRCLE CLAMPS
$1,734.00
CIRCLE CLAMPS
$85.00
$1,819.00
BURGLAR ALARM SERV
$92.00
$92,00
PLBG SUPP
$84.53
$84.53
HIP LENGTH JACKETS
$172.50
$172.50
SUPPLIES
$35.75
PARTS
$7.56
PARTS
$183.60
$226.91
WELDING SUPP
$34.23
WELDING SUPPLIES
$34.23
CYLINDER RENTAL
$8,85
WELDING SUPP
$21.40
$98.
ANNUAL LAB ANALYSES FEE
$2,500.00
$2,500.00*
ENGINEERING SUPPLIES
$23.74
ENGINEERING SUPPLIES
$62,23
$85,97
FOREST AVE WATER MAIN REPL
$27,929.00
FOREST AVE WATER MAIN REPL
$69,747.10
$97,676.10
PARTS
$85.80
PARTS
$24.48
PARTS
$120.00
$230.28
1 YR MEMBERSHIP
$66.50
$66.50*
CLOTHING
$113.48
CLOTHING
$32.49
$145.97
PARTS
$160.06
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER & SEWER FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
PARTS
STEEL CLAMPS
MISC REPAIR PARTS
MISC REPAIR PARTS
PARTS
$242,299.20
PAGE 28
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$138.19 $298.25
$1,179.12
$772.75
$355.60
$84.00 $2,391.47
***TOTAL** $242,299.2n
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO.
HAMMER'S PLASTIC RECYCL. CORP.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES - DEC
$3.46
$3.46
CLEANING SERVICE
$140.00
$140.00
BH66-JT-0498-A
$21.40
BH66-JT-3710-A
$8.57
BH66-JT-5262-A
$185.07
BH66-JT-5266-C
$120.28
BH68-JT-7498-A
$21.40
$356.72
WINDOW WASHING
$83.50
$83.'
30 CAR STOPS
$500.00
30 CAR STOPS
$418.29
$918.29
19 NORTHWEST HY
$304.66
$304.66
WATER & SEWER
$5.00
$5.00
$1,811.63
***TOTAL** $1,811.63
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1%31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
RENTAL -DISC CHIPPERS
LEGAL NOTICE
$2,020.00
PAGE 29
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$2,000.00 $2,000.00
$20.00 $20.00
***TOTAL** $2,020.00
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
THE FREDZANI GROUP REIMBURSEMENT
$7,970.85 $7,470.85*
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL**
$7,970.85
CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $7,970.85
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES 1
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BG21-JT-1838-A $56.23 $56.2\3
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC CHRISTMAS DECORATION REMOVAL $2,834.00 $2,834.00
GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO. WINDOW WASHING $171.00 $171.00
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL**
$3,061.23
GENERAL FUND
$3,061.23
********************************************************************************************************
VE,DOR
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PRO
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1474
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1%31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
BANK CHGS-CORP PURP 1974
$122.00
PAGE 30
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$122.00 $122.00*
***TOTAL** $122.00
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
$1,295,333.91
If
DATE RUN 1/31/90
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TIME RUN 11.11.10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING
SUMMARY BY FUND 1/31/90
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$519,472.20
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$38,547.78
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$4,018.47
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$20,089.29
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$286,458.64
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$2,352.83
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$157,291.27
51
CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND
$26,979.67
61
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974
$122.00
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$43,066.88
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$43,091.48
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$153,843.40
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,295,333.91
PAGE 31
ID-APPBAR
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE MOUNT PROSPECT
CHAMBER CONSUMER EXPO
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Chamber, together with School District 214, and the
Daily Herald Newspaper are co -sponsoring the second annual Consumer Expo to be held
March 2, 3, and 4, 1990 at the Forest View Educational Center; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Chamber has chosen an exposition format to attract
the citizen consumer of the Mount Prospect area in the Forest View Educational Center
Fieldhouse to accommodate over 100 exhibits of business, industry and public and private
agencies; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes the efforts of the Mount
Prospect Chamber to showcase the area business and industry products and service; and
WHEREAS, The Village's commitment to a sound economic development program
and unified marketing strategy, requires a strong alliance with the business and industrial
sector of the Corrimunity; and
WHEREAS, the Village will participate with exhibits from Planning and Zoning,
Inspection Services, Fire, Police, Human Services and Public Works in offering information
on Village services, recognizing the value of education in raising the public's level of
awareness regarding Village services and programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect enthusiastically supports the
Mount Prospect Chamber, School District 214 and the Daily Herald sponsorship of the
second annual Consumer Expo as an educational and informational tool to acquaint citizen's
of the Mount Prospect area with products and services, of both the private and public
sector.
SECTION TWO: That the citizen and business consumers be encouraged to attend
the free Consumer Expo on March 2, 3, and 4 and gain more insight into the wide range
of business, professional, governmental and service organizations serving the Mount
Prospect area.
SECTION THREE: That this resolution shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED this day of , 1990.
APPROVED this _day of , 1990.
ATTEST:
low"ALI
FA
NUW�OR
Village of L,_auntProspect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JANUARY 25, 1990
SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE REQUEST - CLASS W
MICKEY'S DINER (FORMERLY ARNOLD'S)
TWO WEST BUSSE AVENUE
Mr. Patrick Kane, owner of Mickey's Diner, previously called Arnold's Diner, bas
requested a Class W Liquor License which is consumption of beer and wine only at
dining tables. Mr. Kane indicated that he had not owned a liquor license in the past
and this is his first restaurant endeavor.
His reason for requesting beer and wine is that he wishes to expand his eating menu so
that he would entice more families to eat dinner at his establishment. His present hours
are from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., 'Monday through Thursday; 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on
Friday and Saturday and closed on Sunday. He would keep the hours the same even
with the changed menu. Mr. Kane feels that the beer and wine would help his evening
trade and allow him to broaden and up -grade his dinner menu. He wishes to start the
sale of beer and wine as soon as possible. Mr. Kane indicated that the previous owner
had a beer and wine license which they allowed to lapse about two years ago. Mr.
Kane's observation was that the previous owner's business had fallen off to such a level
that the $1,500 for the License would have been a financial burden.
To the best of my knowledge, there were no complaints or problems when Arnold's had
a Class W License.
JOHN FULTON Dl;tN
JFD/rcw
attachment
1/18/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XV ENTITLED "PROPERTY
MAINTENANCE CODE" OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 21.1503 of Article XV entitled "Property
Maintenance Code" of Chapter 21, as amended, is hereby further
amended by adding thereto the following; so that hereinafter said
Section 21.1503 shall include in proper alphabetical sequence the
following definitions:
BOARDED UP: Any closing up of the window, doorway(s) ,
or other means of egress and ingress of
any structure.
STRUCTURE: That which is built or constructed,
including but not limited to buildings for
any occupancy or use.
SECTION TWO: That Section 21.1516 of Article XV entitled "Property
Maintenance Code" of Chapter 21, as amended, is hereby further
amended by adding thereto paragraph E.; so that hereinafter said
Section 21.1516.E shall be and read as follows:
11E. Exterior openings in vacant structures.
Exterior openings to be secured:
a. Any exterior opening in a vacant structure which,
in the judgement of the Director of Inspection
Services, has fallen into disrepair under the
requirements of the Property Maintenance Code
(Article XV of Chapter 21 of the Village Code) or
constitutes a hazard or nuisance to the citizens of
Mount Prospect shall be enclosed and secured for its
entire height and width with wood or a similar non -
penetrable material.
b. The wood or other non -penetrable covering affixed
in, over, or behind any exterior opening of a vacant
structure shall be painted a color consistent with
the exterior of the vacant structure.
C. No structure or portion of a structure that has been
boarded up pursuant to the provisions of Section
21.1516.E shall be required to be painted if said
vacancy is reasonably anticipated to remain for a
period of fourteen (14) days or less.
2. Permit Required:
a. No building may be boarded up in the Village of
Mount Prospect without first obtaining a permit from
the Inspection Services Department. Application for
said permit shall be accompanied by a statement
describing with particularity the type of materials
to be used for the boarding up and the exact area
to be boarded up. The fee for said permit shall be
twenty-five dollars ($25.00).
b. In the event that a structure is rendered vacant as
a result of fire or other sudden catastrophic
Ch. 21
Board -up
Page 2 of 2
occurence, such that a permit cannot be reasonably
obtained prior to the boarding up of such structure,
the owner shall make application for said permit
within 48 hours of the event rendering said
structure vacant.
C. Notwithstanding the requirements contained herein,
any structure rendered vacant due to fire or
other sudden catastrophic occurence shall not be
required to pay the permit fee provided in 2.a
herein.
SECTION THREEL That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1 1989.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of ]cunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1990
SUBJECT: PATE'S SUBDIVISION (WILDWOOD LANE)
The attorney for Mrs. Pate has presented us with a draft Agreement, however, the
numbers are still in dispute. We continue to have considerable amount of problems
getting a response from the engineer and attorney for Mrs. Pate in a timely fashion.
This item should be deferred from the February 6 Agenda.
I spoke with the attorney for Mrs. Pate late on Friday and he indicated that it is
necessary for us to have at least one more meeting. I concur.
JOHN FULTON DIXON
JFD/rcw
_,VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROS-i-iXT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-69-SU-89, KENNETH ELDRUP
LOCATION: 1716 FREEDOM COURT
DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1989
Mr. Eldrup is requesting a Special Use to allow a three car garage, Mr. Eldrup first
appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 5, 1989 to present his case. He
stated that he and his sons have a hobby of restoring cars and that an extra storage space
was needed for one of the restored cars. Therefore, he removed the wall between the
original two -car garage and the recreational room in his new home to provide additional
garage space. Mr. Eldrup stated to the Board that he is not operating a body shop out of
his garage.
The Eldrup family lives in a new single family home in the Brentwood Subdivision. It was
altered in the Spring without a permit, to expand the garage space into what used to be a
recreational room. )k Special Use permit is required for a three -car garage. No external
changes have been made on the home, therefore, it appears as a two -car garage from the
street.
The Building Department has stated that they have serious concerns about allowing this
conversion as garage space, since it does not appear to meet Building Code w h
requirements.
Several neighbors of the Eldrups were in attendance at the hearing to voice their objections
to this request. Complaints were based upon the excessive noise, bright lights, fumes and
late hours of operation during these past summer months.
Since only four Zoning Board members were present at this first hearing, Mr. Eldrup
requested delaying the vote until the following Zoning Board meeting. On November 9,
the Zoning Board continued this hearing and decided to take the vote with the five
members present. A motion was made to approve the three -car garage request conditioned
upon the Building Department's review and approval. The vote was 3-2 which falls one
vote short of approval. Therefore, a super majority, of the Village Board would be required
to overturn the Zoning Board's recommendation for denial.
PB:hg
Approved:
David M. Clements, Director--
FFANK 0,0. M
NEWPORT SO.:-
'OSELLE ILLINOISWII 2
89A-US0
OF
LOT 40 IN BRENTWOOD. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE
S. W. 1/4 OF SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
A180'
<!
XA t4
D
"1;46 le
40
'w -,
4 Ir a 1, 'T�—
10, it
q
0
room t
lava..
m". m lml-i. �
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 69 -SU -89
FETITIo,NER:
PUBLICATION DATE:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Hearing Date: November 9, 1989
Kenneth Eldrup
September 19, 1989
1716 Freedom Ct.
Special Use per Section 14.1101.C.6
to allow a three -car garage within
the structure without any
external changes.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Len Petrucelli
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Peter Lannon
Robert Brettrager
None
This case is continued from October 5, 1989.
Mr. Kenneth Eldrup, 1716 Freedom Court, requested a continuance of his
case until such time as all members of the Zoning Board of Appeals are
present to vote, since four affirmative votes would be necessary to
grant his special use request.
Chairman Basnik indicated the difficulty in determining when a full
Board would be present. Mr. Eldrup questioned whether the members not
present could vote in absentee. Mr. Basnik stated that unless a Board
member is present a vote could not be recorded.
Mr. Dave Clements, Director of Planning, stated that one continuance
is a Petitioner's right; the second would be at the Board's
discretion. It was noted that other matters within other Village
Departments are pending on this case and an expedient conclusion on
the special use is requested.
It was the consensus of the Board to vote on this case and move it to
the Village Board level for the November 22 meeting.
ZBA 69 -SU -89
Page Two
Ms. Brothers, seconded by Ms. O'May, moved to grant Petitioner's
request for a special use from Section 14.1101-0-6 to allow a
three -car garage, said three -car garage is already in place, but is to
be subject to changes approved by the Village and as established by
the Codes that are inexistence at this time.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucellit Brothers, Basnik
Nayes: Cassidy, O'May
By a vote of 3-2, the motion failed. Four affirmative votes were
necessary for passage. Village Board action will be required in this
case and five affirmative votes will be necessary to grant the special
use.
Nr- Eldrup requested that the record show his objection to the way in
which the vote was conducted, placing him at an unfair advantage.
Based on the previous indications of the absent Board members, this
motion would have been approved.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 69 -SU -89
Hearing Date: October 5, 1989
PETITIONER:
Kenneth Eldrup
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 19, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1716 Freedom Ct.
REQUEST:
Special Use per Section 14.1101.C.6
to allow a three -car garage within
the structure without any
external changes.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT:
Len Petrucelli
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn OlMay
OBJECTORVINTERESTED:
Carol Craig
Christine Rider
Bob Schumacher
Per the Petitioner's request for a full Board vote,
Chairman Basnik
noted that this case will be heard with the four mem
the vote will be held over until a bers present and
future meeting
members have been able to review theng after the absentee
accordingly. transcript and can vote
Mr- Kenneth Eldrup, 1716 Freedom Court, Petitioner, stated that he has
-lived in this home for one year, but has been a 20 year resident of
Mount Prospect. The request is for a Special Use to allow three
vehicles within the existing structure. NO external changes will
occur to this structure. One of the three vehicles will be defueled.
The sons of the Petitioner both purchased vehicles about four years
ago and have recently completed restoration on these cars. The
restored cars are only driven on a limited basis and only in the
summer. At all other times they are stored. Mr. Eldrup would like to
support this type of activity for his sons. Restoration was being
completed during the Spring and more activity, relative to car
restoration, was going on than will occur in the future. Mr. Eldrup
emphatically denied running an auto body shop and offered the car's
titles for Board review.
ZBA 69 -SU -89
Page Two
Mr. Eldrup-stated that he had never been approached by any neighbor
relative to the activities and only became aware of the dislike
through complaints to the Building Department. It was again explained
that there has never been and never will be any auto body work done
for any commercial purposes at this property.
Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that this property is
a new single family home in the Brentwood Subdivision, which has been
altered to expand the garage spade into what used to be a recreational
room. No permits were issued. Complaints were issued to the Code
Enforcement Department and they then inspected the home. A Special
Use is necessary for the three -car garage and, more importantly,
Building Code questions must be resolved. All Special Use Standards
must be met in this case. ;o external changes have been made on the
home. Three -car garages are allowed when there is no impact on the
neighborhod, the home is large and has a large lot. Staff recommends
two conditions if this garage is approved. One, that no business be
run out of this garage; and two, the Building Coes should be upheld
as per the determination of the Village's Building Department.
Mr. Lannon noted that any resident has the right to appeal to the
Village Board any Building Codes enforced upon him. By conditioning
the approval, the Board will be denying the rights of the resident.
It was the consensus of the Board not to condition the approval with
upholding the Building Codes.
Caroldintroducedpictures
unableuse impact on the area, She was ,
to use the front porch in the
summer due to the noiselbright ligihts:, and fumes from cars and spray
paint. There are frequently a
parked d
and along the adjoining street. Drahave mufflers. She g
explained .
.-_,
« « live by Santa Fe
racingartment has been notified several times.
Ms. Christine Rider, 1715 Freedom, also cited the noise and paint
fumes until all hours of the night during the summer. There was a
concern for the neighborhood children with cats
«and down
Mr. Boar Schumacher, 1706 freedom, pointed out that the garage was used
during the summer, morning, noon and night. It definitely looked as
if a business were beingrun. Noise, cars racing up and down the
street and activity in the garage all the time were major concerns.
Mr. Eldrup questioned the audience whether or not they had noticed a
change since ,he had been notified. They agreed there had been a
change as soon as the Village Hearing sign went up in the yard.
However, there were concerns for the same thing happening again next
summer.
Mr. E.ldrup explained that this may be a non -issue, since activity has
ceased and he intends to comply with regulations.
ZBA 69 -SU -89
Page Three
Ms- Brothers quoted Code on the definition of a garage, which states
"A private garage is an accessory building or an accessory portion of
the principal building which is intended and used to store motor
vehicles. Such a garage may be used for the storage Of motor vehicles
designed to carry not more than 10 passengers and not amore than one
V!L r,
a
that t:'ns."
a garage is for storage.
' rt -was emphasiz,---d
Mr. Eldrup explained that the activities occurred in the Spring, the
cars are restored and will be used normally from now on.
Upon a straw vote of the Board members Present, Basnik and Brothers
would vote no and Lannon and Brettrager would vote yes to allow.
This meeting was continued until November 9 at 8:00 p.m. It was noted
that even if the garage is approved, Building Codes must be satisfied
and the Building Department will be reviewing all concerns,
not in a public hearing, however,
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
,,,VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROS.—CT
PLANNING AND ZOMG DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CVAIR-Nji_N
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-69-SU-89, KENNETH ELDRUP
LOCATION.. 1716 FREEDOM COURT
DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1989
Attached are minutes from the October 5, 1989 Zoning Board of Appeals hearing. mr.
Eldrup had requested postponing the Zoning Board of Appeals decision on his case until
November 9. It is appropriate for Zoning Board members who were absent at the last
hearing to vote on this case, if they are confident that, by reading the minutes, they
understand all issues involved.
PB:hg
--VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSI-f=
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPAMMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C IRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER:__a<�p
SUBJECT: ZBA-69-SU-89, KENNETH ELDRUP
LOCATION: 1716 FREEDOM COURT
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a special use per Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow a three car garage
within the existing structure without requiring any external changes
Y1L_LA_QLaTAff_CQ_M_MENTS
The Inspection Services Department notes that in June they received complaints regarding
the expansion of the existing two car garage at this house. Upon an inspection from the
street, they could see that a wall was removed between the garage and the recreation room,
expanding the size of the garage to allow three cars. These alterations occurred without
any review or approval from the Village, Mr. Eldrup was then informed by the Village to
file a special use request for the three car garage. Along with the zoning concerns, they
also have some major Building Code questions. The Building Code outlines specific
requirements that must be met when a garage space is adjacent to living space. Since the
new expanded garage space was originally living space, it does not meet Building Code
requirements for a garage, and it will be difficult to meet unless major revisions are made.
A summary of these concerns are attached for further review, however, these Building Code
issues will have to be taken up by the Building Department before a garage permit is
issued. No other comments or objections were received from other departments regarding
this case,
The Eldrups live in a new single family structure at the end of the Freedom Court cul-de-
sac. They back up to the high tension lines and Soo Line Railroad track at the far eastern
edge of the Brentwood Subdivision. As stated above, Mr. Eldrup altered the inside of his
home after they moved in without receiving building permits. The rear wall of the two car
garage was knocked out in order to create an additional garage space. What once was a
recreational room, is now part of a garage. This is a unique situation which the Village has
never encountered before,
Gil Basnik - 2
September 28, 1989
ZBA-69-SU-89
The first step in receiving approval to allow the existence of this expanded garage space is
to receive a special use fo .zhr�e-car gaiage. P,,e special wise :tanda,-ds must be —t*.
From a strictly zoning ng stanopoint, this request would not seem to have much of an impact
upon the neighborhood, since there have been no external changes to the building. From
the street it appears that there is a two -car garage. None of the walls to the rear of the
house have been expanded or altered for this garage modification. Generally, three -car
garages are allowed by special use if they don't impact the neighborhood and if they are
located on a large sized lot and need the room for extra car storage.
As with any special use request, it is appropriate to attach conditions to alleviate any
problems now or in the future. Therefore, if the Board is of the opinion that the special
use standards can be met with this request, we do recommend the following conditions.
1. No business be run out of this garage. The garage space should not be used as
a work shop to work on other people's cars.
2. The Building Codes should be upheld as per the determination of our Building
Department. This will probably require alterations to the structure in order to meet
Code.
In summary, this request is an unusual one in that they have modified a brand new existing
home to include a three -car garage without altering the exterior of the house. The zoning
questions may not be as important and relevant to this specific case as the Building Code
questions. If the Board considers approval of the special use permit they should condition
it upon our recommendations above.
PB: hg
���0��� � �� U����—
_ ~ �� � Mount ~ ������
mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Ara
. IW
��I�°
.~
TO: Paul Bednar. p7annin" ""^ 7°.i _ ~�w���
o4��
FROM: Dan Jakes lnspection Se i �C�n^ ~�o�
,' � , ry ces 4Cr*' —' PAI, C,,v
v^/u September 21, 1988
RE: 1776 FREEDOM COURT - MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS PEI --
Paul:
Please be advised 7716 Freedom is a new single family structure which
I was a zcred after the Certificate Of Occupancy was issued
Unfortunately, ppprio
plans were not received ��r review or approval `
`" Mr. �/orup s alterations. r
As prior correspondence will indicate, the rear wall of the
^ garage
was into �bi�bles��ex�~~in� t� garage for structural and life safety
According to the building code "walls, partitions, floors and ceilings the garage s f he pace
constructed
of not less than one (1) hour fire resistance rating. Attached private
garages shall be completely separated from the interior spaces and
the attic area by 5/8 Class X (Village requirement) with a bulkhead
above. The sills of all doors opening between the garage and adjacent
interior space shall be raised not less than six (6) inches (Village
requirement) above the garage floor. Door opening protectives shall
be 1-3/4 inch solid core wood door or approved equivalent."
« room extension to a garage cannot be termed as a "Recreation Room"
*jdnce the hazard
result. is actually intensifying the use and creating an
As per the definition of a garage:
TO: Paul Bednar, Planning and Zoning
FROM: Dan Jakes, Inspection Services
DATE: September 21, 1989
RE: 7718 FREEDOM COURT - MOUNT PROSPECT. ILLINOIS
Page 2
"Garoq- l. A building or wing of a building, as of a house, in which
to park a car or cars."
"14.2602 (D)
Garage
Private
°A pri,ate garage is an accessory
building, or an —acmessory —portionof m principal building, which is intended and used to store motmrvehicles, Such a garage may be used for the storage of motor vehiclesdesigneu to carry not more than tem (10) passengers and not more thanone pick up truck having a load capacity of one andone-half (7~1/2)zoms or less. (Ord. 3348" 7-5-83)"
Information received and researched indicate a extension of a GARAGE
and not the creation of a Semantics is is noc relevant since intensification has taken place.
Major structural changes had taken place in which were addressed in
previous correspondence. (See File)
Please address the following questions:
|. Where and hcw will the fuel from the removed fuel tank of the
motor vehicle be stored? What provisions will be made in the
event of a fuel spill?
2. What type activity will he done in the third room (Recreation
Room) specifically? Is the third vehicle stored for display
only?
l What is the existing construction of the walls,ceiling and floor
of the recreation room? This must be verifiedby an inspection.
4. Will the new doors between the recreation room and garage he solid
core doors?
In conclusion:
Specific information required from a structural engineer and architect
are required to authorize and or change back the building to its
original condition.
Please advise if additional questions exist.
uwrm '
Attach.
cc: Charles Bencic" Inspection Services Director
dkiea wa and mrk�t -orad par tt�► htd tttr+Mrdwt • TM +ask .
so tompedin
isad t6mdw •ie d��a�
_a,r nw w ,A far d vWwl ag: "Aw Cher kor d taawdoss gddw fswL
err -+amen err qe *cw *or '"a". Too for New ,Arnwy. � A"
w tr're aMle Awweni, f...... tom. vMi �pc^�►rt: •' "dtr) a..4rZAWC, r * A .wDhcr for rtr,�nax
rspats tM atnrwk,. !aw tMwM kw �v) olatkeac wnra� b, Taw onew ou d a wWwoea L Any 90
van ohauabar„ PAiddw 211-1616 how Old Fvwnok : "Aar",
A ry A Auy d wrveral gnmrtodt wronws db ttpafrtr 'A'
" tKdts °
tpows Syrrtewww; �» S troc t", ulama)do ten etaehwa a * d Aid. and owe d d.
hada and causing gap -
Ger. fwstwar ItMwrra 1131-t11L Twattkwtb
(tt+i+mt) wb. and wide oven; averaouc a ttwar 46, s d tae lx flsawa 111118
pe) 00, Afflicted with the tsps ar a lords1b►t� 'thkw A tba rtarwA
A t. Any d wvvtW tanad fiabca d the teoua fair of frash and lar*ckub vwatcrt d North end C*otn! tloatoaa�tand body aad a tong aaoat. 2. A SW h ,may Visa Y
tw related fish,suflt as tin ab. Alsa otilad "tar' the
masa. �d3*letsal tartraar ice)) ctwaarrear plararrorrm
{arpike,"' (Short foe paxrtsw,9 ScorrwA. To auwe a Oowtltm"arw it ), A peed k]M Head for bur coca r w,
w+>*+ag. tt•r� 12% i the Ywro a Rabeloia'
(M' Fzrtdad m, from None tura, to make mow p .
*� afire GartarOW ataf Partwarrw+d.
m Ap twran (gtiftsr' ) *#. Also N rA Of
12 Grand of the Rapubdc. sawn fArrss a
rl ; :Areae on. 4hb) a, 1. A at ummena tat or valance: � coioawnk kurp�Sytonyma
d * bWldA& a of a bsrwawl in vrbwck to park a err or ern. of *VWWAO%
esu
all When an sn reposed and timet S) at „htaa� a lid xxkuM, ap
-rr,r, rwttmwt. To fret u a Bring o v
(each, om tarcr, to (ships), atop u s bw sheat from Fxwaoft , tartest, rorty *J in Apf
CNd Fnocd o warn pr'otect,. guard, from Freakish t i from Latin tarter" t gar gsrerwa u Ap.
(uurtataud) Ser ww' m Appendix-")-Awry, 1, To force ex-
the distinctive *Ulm d Of*"(gb"id) v. i►"*
r1r a or ttatloa rwrrlc+f terb. rr.r, garbed. garwins, air tdc a ui u dare Doak d tks month with
To cover wttd or at d with dsthlrwt m dttmts array. the bead tilted u orderw do—or the mouth
Fraotk trrrbt, traafd from Italian or thrust. 2. To produce the sound of When
as
oe, elogaact d draaa, from . Sa grradrwa a or Wig. -it. 1. To run or mad icIta (the mowth or throat ►
* by tartling. 2. To oeroalsa or sppty (a aofutioo or Slalloso)fry
(#Llbh) A 1. *.Food wear,-, w hum a kitchen. sarid aodxtusn foaepr with 2. rlhaif prtihtt ed. -. 1C1. French
gafrtae. 2. Trash, rubbatb; rketordradtarbatt. (ltfiddla Eayf-
trraaft, offal d an animal, rodabb from Norman Frmdt tam er WonA 1 l+tr 'l od Vout varied to represent a
�t (uaattutwdk possibly from )tadao diakttrt twAwao,umwn or trwimal fitrn and been a tartar
m fJ1d ftakan rorfiwtfte. maar owaatarx.l m y Water dawn of ma waL 3 � of". a
kwrrso (tar bAn rb) A, saw A plant rho died on (ret).
a as adiblt read. iSpanrtJt porGaaaro, aPttration (influenced fry+ maataf ffJf+rra � pin, ( drbe tarin r from
arch) of GI Spsn9sh a from Catrm,amc, akin to
C>0d Fratuob tartr e. )partard. " ° Latin taw twdAa,
fft>rd German ara+weu, peA cin trwow bitter votth, W?nd' " ,Set t� m
q d Asintio orittm) (pat i. o bwNdt A A boar ' ed klouw Ayble
4ttt'kwl) w.t. diad IwMNrq �aawt 1. Tu dssaort or ata a. aCtm Ida r tltirrac of )df awd kta acidiara fashionable
(an atwsrrtnt or ) to at b kw w.tna . LTO wweag Iw aha Had I9rk oawamf,
owd wilt -A not m 1a utrtaaaf 44 WAMOPPO,
d $wr•bbwd atf ( s tw nal frwelew g rFbM1
Eaugdak tarAedew o rift ttima from Ixatan
Z= Ittrgb (511 ft) 40 a rnd w
Aube !herbals» hnwn tom., dt+rz , ega ) js 1, A Barred by solar or excessive
' to ads from „ 2.( rills; mwdry. t Land ad tweak
Wit' a) --o w'** a. "Ndlt ear t r
4lreen. (lrionald as,^GuslaNtrra, Sora tart"' � �), CF
Y9o3, American erican mosses-pian- err ea, sown, An tManw let ddMt itrawwrt.)
SW ehgh-bo+= „
,brltdl A Arwalost The first or -�awtw A w
`wwba of A ,. A wraaffi. nrIw of frome * d fkrwwfs,
awnka d a laid asst o the skip"s kali. t37daaka
pwbapt ]gams, m tatkw¢, rau d rtrt a other mamwral tam 1a a is 0 or or orn w leant *a
• + Dutch board" hot. do % A wrath wotkerl air meW for tion
#*as"(wa owidn. u )
der, t side from taraak Aarr. board (we hwarda u aIU owed lawn haws les Alar atad t twdw
*). Frenchuta" Waft). rt, Nautical. A teats a tell" d rope or "4
ry A Archak wp OU) , Mild
from Old hall" towbo rlfa, formati m afro used ms lainat of ptevwat rabbktt or k aymt„ t An
Sit, fm`*Aaw) from !.aids isaMs. to Imbkim. gat wrw' sad da a erre
alweata. 1»'f'o or dent with a pwhmd. L To form Into
o�cw) Sot brew a pA ger' � frown Old French
so (X&-DW) A. /L qww (-tdM). Freack A waiter. Lit- eaakisdavailf6 wferw wwmao 040selk warts, R mstwou a*& with Sold �w1' is
twwwrto. twhw (Wdt)> lboon trrtwo a dwo-do (11'86 lit tar°dt). � ) A 9, A plant Afflaa �, rwdwwd to the
. ^ T1wr iartart lake d forty (141 tgrtwra mt1mX tituatad iw tba wadi on a odor and f VW.
'Yes! mlfm enat d hffian 2. Taw her of d& pmt. �r �w a and ord
a
Variant d w
twwdwOld Isn"
t. of load uad for the at as a awalonowt py ",am vtons=kS.rrnwsr (awl �� ��
Ltrw, "spar aattt (exam JM—I4&, spwer la the 1930 fawn
With flow tdrrtda, and tree for v enjoyment. > A yard;gtetww hs y) ewf taiwitlMg tastug d wn Aawre r�rrrrtti +
**am 4. A fa tile. ad r. rw dwawd Jw► gwn ear"1
Jaw -=err. i. Ta (a ON trotrmf) as a garden pslwt, two NO& prlitm alitwNw native to "t
In; furbish wits, a4atden err--wwlr, To weoAr as a � w A awn as odor a/ ttvYn d
for, err fottad as h**hatIntel no
a t*rden. a1 by p�dw+ pta+a3ad WO craw *rrwws tlrwr s a. 1. Any artk r d
and trru nary: tardww ayarx maww, 1 Omit ueaot; dkr out" artoh own a cwt or drawn 1! - a10
arawar twderr mrlex . [Middle tar from +dad t&rd, -tr.t. � res. To wo
y tat rxArwtad, from freed $ORW
North French t♦ardim. from Vulywr Partin (honwr) taratww (urn ratrw *tqutponwt erlom wiarWr. o fornkh edltdRm, Saw wwar-*
attested) "enclotw) ((tterden)."" ran: ta+do (uns ), foam,
from Fraok.isb tardo (unstu rrwd). Sot aner-a in Ap- u Apprr+efu•*)
otoknum ,) taws"mn PMwk (tlemq The barbet dr^dso (2s "o (at) u
ptrr•drwrw (tird'aor, tardro-or) A A pence who wort u or tart .t,R. part wa 1. To prior and
sande a pr for pin or prtdyt tfw'`
' Chrdon Grow, A ci of touthwattts California near Ana. tart- ren or as len a . 2. o ematC actwisn, --'& A
6wina PoputatGm 121 oofl s*meary'. � rh 8*rrwor; tdaww, sranarf`. ftwm t)ld
A: i Iep yr cultivated apesia d vsklisa, Yar French trtr . trwdrr. from Lam tom• bows trdYwrwr.
, having down of weal! ptsrpksb, pink» or Ser gwt�two- is *1
vrb3tw flowers. Www (WSW), Marr aeaara ly. !967. Vex d
..._.t.-,d.* rasr dta"va, -Mm4) A t. AnXd various abrubs taws United Issue under Franklin D. (1933 II)
aW nwV (*Woff) A 1. Any d seven! osaomtiarr, rruwd till
14ZOMM 14
GARAGE A private Suage is an accesaery bug&, or an aocesutry
PRIVATE: POrbO0 of the princ 6al binliding, which is intaaded and us-
ed to stom motor vdileles. Such a pragg may be Med for
the s?orage of ret velucks designed to carry not rr.ore
than tet (10) passengers and. not More than one pickup nude
havkq a bad capv* of one and f (I' j) toxo or
lest. (Ord. 3348, 7-543)
GRADE: lite elevation above mean sea level used for establishing the
following:
A. Natural Grade. The normal contour of the Land prior
to alteration or improvement; (Ord. 3295, 12-7-82)
B. Base (established) Grade. The average elevation of the
established cub extending the width of the front of a lot,
or where no curb is established, the average elevation of the
crown of the saw adjacent to the front of a lot. (Gird. 3295,
12-742; Ord. 3878, 12-"7).
C. Fmi4shed Grade. The elevations of contours, resulting from
excavation4r filling as approved by the Village. (Ord. 3295,
127.82)
GROSS FLOOR The stun of the gross horizontal areas of a4 floors of a -
AREA: ing, including pirindpal and any uses and storage areas,
as measured from the exterior face of the exterior walls. For
Purposes of measurement for off-street parking and Wading
and floor arca ratios, gross floor am shall exclude:
A for storage of buRding, mechanical and
HVAC equipnNent, and
B. Interior parking areas, and
C. Interior Wading docks but not including storage areas
adjacent to kaftg docks.
D. For single-family lily c t, basements shall be exclud-
ed. (Ord. 3412, 4.3-94)
GROUP CARE Any residentW faAty located in a t'Municipald 4,.., `4 *whichProvides ,:.+, home venvironment �, under .
-AwithpNk"I'liar 1- t-stinknum of
six (6) Nat not more than twenty five (25) hxfividuals ex-
dusive of supervisory personnel including and firnived to the
developmentay disabled, or the handilcappotl or senior
cidzM
El
DC/caf
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1716 FLZEEDOM COURT
WHEREAS, Kenneth N. and Karen R. Eldrup (hereinafter referred to
as Petitioners) have filed a petition for a Special Use with
respect to property commonly known as 1716 Freedom court
(hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 40 in Brentwood, being a subdivision of part of the
west half of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township
42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal meridian,
according to the plat thereof recorded July 20, 1987 as
Document 87,399,136 in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a Special Use for the Subject Property,
pursuant to Section 14.1101.0.6, to permit a 3 -car garage; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 69 -SU -89) before the zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 5th day of October
and the 9th day of November, 1989, pursuant to proper legal notice
having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 19th day
of September, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have given further consideration to the requests
herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of
the Village and that the granting of the proposed Special Use would
be in the best interest of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
9JECTION ON : The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property a Special
Use to permit a 3 -car garage subject to the following conditions:
1. The intent of this ordinance is to provide indoor storage
space for restored automobiles. Any activity other than this
storage and related work violates the intent of this
Ordinance.
2.
The garage
addition is in a former family room. Approval
of
this area as
a garage space is subject to compliance with
all
applicable
building codes.
3.
The 3 -car
garage shall be for personal vehicles of
the
petitioner
and family members.
4.
The garage
shall not be used for any home occupation
or
storage of
any non-residential items.
5.
There shall
be no external changes to the building or lot
in
relation to
this Special use.
ZBA 69 -SU -89
Page 2 of 2
6. Any activity related to the use of the garage shall meet all
standards of the Village Code relating to nuisances, noise,
fumes and any other applicable regulation.
SECTION THREE: That with the exception of the Special Use
specified herein, all other regulations of the Village Code shall
apply to the Subject Property,
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1 1989,
ATTEST:
'Carol A. �.Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSI
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER V, VIL
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: COURTESY HOME CENTER - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: 740 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1990
This request for final ordinance approval was continued to the Village Board meeting of
February 6. The following issues were to be reviewed:
1.
Cee ed ....ajorage area,
screen evelopez has indicated that he can ins#all a cluster of 0' to 12' evergreen trees
8, in height. Howevez, please note that because of an depicts evergreens 6' to
existing watermain at the rear
of this site, a foot bean, as originally proposed, will not
be allowed.
2. Curbed Median at Harvest Lane exit-,
The owner of the property has agreed to install a curbed median in the Courtesy
driveway, at Harvest Lane. This median will force exiting traffic to make a more
defined left -tum, reducing the chance of drivers maneuvering across both traffic
lanes of Harvest Lane, as they travel toward Business Center Drive. I believe this
is the best solution to the issue raised by residents concerning traffic congestion at
the intersection of Harvest Lane and Business Center Drive.
3.jMfflg_&M:.Main entrance at R
Chuck Bencic talked with the Illinois Department of Transportation about the
possibility of the State allowing a stop light at the Rand Road entrance to Courtesy.
I.D.O.T. indicates that a light would be acceptable if certain traffic warrants were
met. Also, the light would have to be inter -connected to the light sequence at
Business Center Drive. '17his light would have to be installed and maintained by the
property owner.
Also, a summary of several other items is in the attached December 28 memo. Lastly, the
developer of the self -storage facility has asked that the attached letter be distributed to the
Village Board. This memo discusses advantages to his proposed development.
DMC:hg
Attach.
V.LLAGE OF MOUNT F. -O -SPECT
WNING AND ZONING DEPARI_ -,ENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
wr
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: December 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Courtesy Home Center - Planned Unit Development
At the December 19 Village Board meeting, there was discussion about a variety of items
related to the proposed Planned Unit Development at the Courtesy Home Center. This
memo attempts to address these items:
1. Access to Har W9 Ung from tt-CurtmCenter dhvgw_u:
Adjoining property owners are concerned about existing traffic patterns as drivers
exit the Courtesy property at Harvest Lane. Automobiles exit the Courtesy drive
and travel in the "most direct IiW to the intersection at Business Center Drive. is
Zine of travel cuts across both '17h
traffic lanes of Harvest Lane. This movement can be
dangerous, and lead to congestion and poor traffic flow.
As a remedy, it is recommended that curbed median be installed in the Courtesy
e
n the "most direct line" to Business
fi
driveway. With this median, exiting traffic will be required to make a more defined
left turn, reducing the chance of drivers traveling i
Center Drive. Also, Harvest Lane should be striped, to better define travel lanes.
This alternative has been discussed with the Engineering Department and they
concur that it is the best action to take.
2. Bpilding -till Chant, Facility:
The P.U.D. ordinance includes a section requiring the quick change oil facility to
be finished in face brick. Mr. David Beebe, of Lube Pro, indicates that the company
is attempting to build units with a certain identity, that are easily recognizable, and
different from their competitors. He is asking that the building be finished in a
textured split face block, with blue trim. Please see the attached letter and color
picture.
3.Mrnj2steL!_QgjjQ
7 , lf�_�fadLljy:
Screened dumpster locations will be located at the east and west ends of the self -
storage facility. They will be placed out of the required Fire Department travel aisle.
LEBOVIC ..REALTY GROUP INC.
7337 N. Uncoln Avenue • Suite 290 • UncoIn\q0od
, Illinois 60646 o (312) 676-1100 o FAX 676-0579
January 12, 1990
Mr. David Clements
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
RE: ZBA-77-SU-89,ZBA-78-V-89, Courtesy Real Estate
720-740 E. Rand (Courtesy Shopping Center)
Dear Dave:
I am writing both as the retail leasing agent of Lebovic Realty
Group and a principal of Sterling Development Group. In the past
few Village meetings and other meetings with you, it appears most
of the issues raised by the Mayor and Trustees were resolved or are
being studied further. However, there still appear to be three
issues not yet fully answered, related to the 9991f-storaqe_And oil
change facility sj_t,g. We would like to address those issues with
this letter and hopefully satisfy the concerns of the Mayor,
Trustees and Staff.
ZUE ONE There is an apparent desire by some of the Trustees to
find a user that generates sales tax revenues and fits the current
zoning. The existing zoning now allows both sales tax generators
and many service businesses that do not generate any sales tax or
very little sales tax. A sampling of uses currently allowable are:
Retail Restaurant
Tavern Hotel or Motel
Hospital -General Home for Aged
Banking Recreation Center
Coin Laundry Undertaker or Funeral Home
School or College Dry Cleaning or/and Plant
Parking Lot
Several residents have told us that they would prefer self -storage,
which is a low profile, low traffic generator and a relatively
Passive use, rather than the above uses.
There are several substantial reasons that clearly confirm that
retail development of this site is very unlikely within the next
5 years. If a retail development would ever materialize it would
be limited in size between 15,000 to 25,000 sq -ft. due to the
CONFIGURATION AND EASEMENT RESTRICTIONS of the site. Sterling
Development and Mike Shelly, have testified that over the last 3
years a number of different real estate brokers, including myself,
have unsuccessfully tried to secure retail tenants for this odd
shaped parcel• EVERYONE CONNECTED WITH THE VILLAGE, ALL OF THE
INVOLVED BROKERS AND DEVELOPERS, AND THE RETAILERS HAVE AGREED THAT
THE SHAPE OF THE LOT AND ITS BLOCKED VISIBILITY FROM THE SOUTH
GREATLY DIMINISHES THE DESIRABILITY OF THIS SITE FOR ANY REASONABLE
Brokerage # Development * Trades * Investments * Insurance • Syndications
ZBA-77-SV-89.ZBA-78-v-89. COURTESY REAL ESTATE 2
JANUARY 12, 1990
RETAIL DEVELOPMENT. Hence there is no demand for this site by
retail users.
In addition, over the last several years wt. Prospect Plaza
Shopping Center has failed to secure tenants for its Phase IT
development, amuoh superior location than many other well situated
developed sites. It should also be noted that Mt. Prospect Plaza
Shopping Center Phase I has 5 vacancies; the current economic
situation in the retail field is very soft, resulting in a greater
vacancy and store closing rate in many existing and new retail
centers; and why attempt to build a limited use retail facility
that mstei/ experts would state has a very high potential for
failure, especially when the area is already highly competitive in
every retail business.
There is amaJur misconception that sales tax generating businesses
always produce a greater amount of revenue for a local government
than service businesses, such as our proposed use. The only way
to make an intelligent judgement in this regard is to analyze the
potential revenues under the various assumptions, which we have
done and describe in the following paragraph.
Our analysis shows that the total tax revenue for mount Prospect
will be greater from the self-storage/oil change development,
rather than a B3 use. The attached "Analysis of Projected Real
Estate and Sales Taxes..." shows that over the next 10 years Mount
Prospect will receive nearly $1.000`000 of taxes from our
development compared to only $500,000 for a retail development.
This assumes a retail development is an unlikely probability for
five years, for the various reasons already stated. However' even
if we would miraculously come up with a retailer today the annual
estimated combined real estate and sales taxes would be almost the
same as the self-storage/oil change.
Since the Village would receive the same amount of tax revenue,
even under the most optimistic retail assumption, the issue of
taxes is really eliminated. That leaves the question of wha-t
�s c--r*ic ie f.- C1 C)eec--. 'thog <-- c�pmmmniI-- y nE�—cl. The
residents of the community do not appear to lack stores and
restaurants. However, they and the businesses of the community
could use the services we are proposing, rather than inconveniently
going outside the area for their storage needs.
ISSUE TWO. RV VEHICLE STORAGE will be screened from the view of
the residents by an additional interior fence along the east side
of the RV area. This additional screening will be designed, to the
best of our ability, to satisfy the Village and residents.
There are a groat number of benefits to the community when
residents can safely store their RV's away from their homes' nv'e
ZBA-77-SU-89,ZBA-78-V-89, COURTESY REAL ESTATE
JANUARY 12, 1990 3
parked on the streets create the Potential for theft. Also, the
safety of children is impaired by the RV's blocking their
visibility when children are crossing the street, Add to that the
unattractiveness of the streets when the streets are used for out -
of -season semi-permanent storage.
_15ME THREE, Regarding the oil change, we Would appreciate your
allowing US to use the exterior material that will be consistent
with Lube Pros marketing design image, rather than the face brick.
It is an image that is intended to be easily recognizable,
attractive, durable, and easy to maintain and clean. The Village's
desire for an attractive and lasting exterior is shared by Lube
Pros and the developers, largely because it is good business to
satisfy your customers desires for an appealing place to get
service. We would appreciate your favorable review of Lube Pros
latest exterior design for new stores, which Dave Beebe of Lube
Pros presented to you.
If YOU feel it desirable and helpful would You please distribute
this letter and attachment to the Mayor and Trustees. We would
of course be willing to cooperate in considering any alternative
suggestions.
Sincerely,
LEBOVIC REALTY GROUP, INC.
Marvin Siegel
Vice President Commercial Division
Analysis of Projected Real Estate and Sales Taxes for Triangular
Vacant Parcel, Currently Assessor PIN 03-35-300-019.
Parcel is Located at the South End of the Courtesy Home
Center at 700 Rand Road, Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Value of building improvements
Land -140,000 sq.ft. at $4.25 (value
used by assessor) 595,000
-
$1,990,000
38%
------------
$756,200
1.9266
-
$1,456,900
$9.801
------------
ASSUMPTION I
Storage/Oil
$1,395,000
Total estimated value
Assessment rate for 1989
Assessed Valuation
Equalization factor
Equalized Valuation
1988 tax rate per $100 valuation
Estimated real estate tax using
1988 rate of $9.801/$100
Current real estate tax on parcel,
at 22% of Assessor's $3.00per sq.
ft. valuation rate, using 1989
reassessed value (71% increase
over 1988). Tax $11,780 x 171%=
Estimated additional real estate
in 1989 dollars
Mt Prospect real estate tax ratio
(see computation on page 2)
Mt Prospect estimated tax share
1% of retail sales
Estimated annual additional Mt.
Prospect tax receipts
ASSUMPTION II
25,000 SQ.FT.
Retail
$875,000
595,000
$1,470,000-
38%
-
$558,600
1.9266
$1,076,200-
$9.801
-------------
$142,800 $105,500
20,100 20,100
$122,700
77.54%
------------
$95,100
2,200
------------
$85,400
77.54%
-------------
$66,200
31,300
-------------
$97,300 $97,500
Taxes generated 1991 thru 2000 (10 yrs.):
Assumption I operational 1991 $973,000
Assumption II operational 1996 $487,500
Assumption I tax contribution to
Mt. Prospect in excess of highly
questionable Assumption II $485,500
ANALYSIS OF REAL ESTATE TAX DISTRIBUTION FOR THE DIRECT
BENEFITS or MT. PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
Taxing Agency
School District 57
vil Mt Prospect Special Sery Areas
Village of Mt Prospect
Village of Mt Prospect Library Fund
Mt Prospect Park District
Arlington Rts 7~oabn High Gnbl 214
Mt Prospect 1988 direct tax benefit
Other 1988 agencies -benefits
1988 Tau
$I83.?l2
4?.413
Percent
To Total
31.77%
3.18% V.18%
11.02%
3.05%
5.68%
22.83%
-------
77,54%
22.46%
1988 tax on guroeI 03-35-300-0I5 $211.135 100.00%
ZBA 77 -SU, 78-V-89,—
Page Four
Upon motion by Ms. Brothers, seconded by Mr. Cassidy, it was moved to
grant the variation from Section 14.2503.A.6 to allow a 10, parking
and driveway setback along the north property line where Code would
normally require a 25, setback.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Basnik
Nayes: Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, O'May
By a vote of 1-4, the motion failed.
Village Board action will be required for all requests.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
ZBA 77 -SU, 78-V-89
Page Three
It was staff's determination not to support the self -storage facility
or the oil change facility. An,amended PUD including Aldi's Grocery
Store, a 7,000 square foot freestanding retail building and future
expansion of allowed uses for a B-3 District, southeast of the
Courtesy building can be supported with conditions stated within the
staff memo.
Discussion ensued regarding Aidi's as owner of its building within a
Planned Unit Development. Mr. Bednar indicated that a cross -easement
and cross -maintenance agreement can be made between the parties, to
which Aldi has already agreed. Chairman Basnik indicated he would
prefer the agreement to be for perpetuity. In discussion of the
future retail, it was noted that any use would need to come back
before the Board for approval.
Mr. Cassidy suggested a de -acceleration lane or right turn lane for
the Cobrtesy property due to the already heavy traffic volume on Rand
Road. Staff indicated that final determination of such would be
through IDOT.
Mr. John Gorn, 301 N. William, requested clarification of building
placement and the Kamysz property and suggested that a site plan be
included on notices sent to neighbors prior to Zoning meetings.
Mr. Don Fox, 223 Autumn Lane, as a new owner in Harvest Heights,
indicated his concerns with the Aldi Food Store and the fence height
around the storage facility. He also questioned whether owners whose
foundations were just being poured were notified of the hearing. Mr.
Bednar indicated that a letter was sent to the developer to try to
deliver to those not listed on tax rolls. Increased traffic through
the Harvest Heights area was a major concern and a stop sign from the
Courtesy property to Harvest Lane was requested.
Mr. Petrucelli expressed concern that an extensive traffic study was
not done for this development. Mr. Dave Clements, Director of
Planning, stated that staff reviewed current traffic and since no new
curb cuts were being requested, felt the site could handle the
additional traffic.
Upon motion by Ms. Brothers, seconded by Ms. O'May, it was moved to
grant the Special Use/Planned Unit Development in a B-3 District to
allow for additional development on the Courtesy Home Center parcel.
Included in the plans is an Aldi Grocery Store of 12,000 square feet,
the remainder of said parcel to be developed at a future date as Phase
II, subject to the conditions as shown on page two of the staff's
report, covering perimeters, signs, access easement, no outside
storage and access drive off of Harvest Lane.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, O'May, Basnik
Nayes: None
By a vote of 5-0, the motion passed.
ZBA 77 -SU, 78-V-85'',-
Page Two
a quick oil change. PUD standards allow for not more than 20% of the
area to be devoted to non -permitted uses. Although these are
non -permitted uses, it was seen to be the highest and best use since
the area has a lack of visibility.
All buildings will be the approximate height of the Courtesy Home
Center and with proposed landscaping improvements will be a benefit to
the neighborhood. Most Village staff concerns would be incorporated
into the Proposal, however, the applicants cannot accept the deletion
of 25 parking spaces to be replaced with a landscape island further
depleting the parking space requirement; nor can they agree to the
access easement between the ,property and Mr. Kamysz' property on Rand
Road.
Mr. Michael Vdovets, developer for the self -storage facility,
indicated that be is currently trying to change the image of
self -storage stressing the benefit to the homeowner and small business
owner while remaining a quiet use compatible with residential areas.
This facility will be comprised of 600 units with the largest being 10
x 20 square feet (the size of a one -car garage), and the smallest
being 5 x 5 square feet for skiing equipment, etc. It will be open
seven days a week from.8:00 a.m. to 7;00 P.M. No parking is required
since people pull in, drop off and leave the site. A manager would be
on site at all times. There would be no problem meeting all staff
concerns. The area will have three gates, two key operated and the
main gate accessible by key punch.
Mr. Vdovets stressed that this would be a quiet facility, providing a
buffer between Rand Road and the residential area. Approximately 3-4
vehicles an hour are anticipated. Photos of several different
self -storage facilities in the suburban area were distributed to the
Board showing the facilities directly adjacent to residential areas.
Mr. David ',Beebee, 3912 Burton Trail, Crystal Lake, Illinois, developer
for LubeCo, a quack oil change facility, indicated that through an
extensive survey found that the site is a very viable location for
,such a facility. A tremendous market exists within a three mile
radius. Current statistics state 9 of drivers use quick oil changes
which is expected to increase to 40"x» by the 1990,s.
Mr. Paul. Bednar, Planner for the Village, explained that the 14 acre
site zoned B -B will be compatible with the retail and grocery use.
The Comprehensive Flan indicates that the area is best suited for
commercial. All proposals will be included in a PUD package. Staff
has concerns with the self -storage facility and the quick oil change
and the uses need to be fuller justified. The oil change facility also
poses a re -use problem should the facility cease to exist. Mr. Bednar
cited several disadvantages to the self -storage facility, including;
no generation of sales tax, other areas within Village for this use
within I-1 light industrial, location next to residential, and
compatibility with other retail uses. However, advantages include use
of an odd -shaped lot which does not. have good visibility, purpose
served within community and lack of traffic generation.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 77 -SU, 78-V-89 Hearing Date: November 9, 1989
PETITIONER: Courtesy Real Estate
PUBLICATION DATE: October 24, 19'89
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
720-740 East Rand Road
Special Use Planned Unit Develop-
ment to allow building expansion on
Courtesy Home Center property to
include a new grocery store, a 7,000
sq. ft. future building for retail,
a self -storage warehouse and a quick
oil change building. Variations to
the PUD standards as per Section
14-2503 to vary parking, setbacks,
lot coverage and percentage of a non
permitted use on the property.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Len Petrucelli
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
John Gorn
Don Fox
Mr. Michael Shelly, 767 South State Street, Chicago, Illinois,
attorney for the Petitioner, stated the applicants desire to 1) sell a
parcel of property to Aldi Food Stores for a 12,000 square foot
building at the northwest corner of the current Courtesy Home Center;
2) build out near Rand Road a 7,000 square foot freestanding retail
building; and 3) to build a 68,742 square foot self -storage facility
and an 1,800 square foot quick oil change facility. All plans are
proposed as part of a planned unit development.
A 01 setback along the north property line was requested, however,
staff has recommended 101, since this will be adjacent to a
residential district. The PUD requirement for 552 parking spaces
cannot be met and the request is to allow 502 parking spaces. Lot
coverage will be 87.5% exceeding the allowable 85%. 22% of the area
would be used for non -permitted uses, i.e., self -storage facility and
John F. Dixon - Page
November 15, 1989
ZBA-77-SU-89, ZBA-78-V-89
Neighbors of this property were present to request clarification of the proposed plans.
One neighbor indicated his concern with the Aldi Food Store anticipating increased traffic
through the Harvest Heights Subdivision as a result of the grocery store. Board members
then discussed the request among themselves. Mr. Cassidy suggested the addition of a
deceleration lane off of westbound Rand Road into this site. Staff indicated that the final
determination of such would be made by I.D.O.T.
Concerning the setback variation along the north property line, the zero foot setback was
denied by the Zoning Board by a 4-1 vote. This action would require the design of a
conforming 25 foot setback. However, staff points out that a 25 foot setback behind the
Courtesy building would interfere with loading and the fire lane. Staff recommends
approval of a 10 foot setback along the north line.
The Zoning Board of Appeals then made a motion to approve an amended P.U.D. plan
which would include a 12,000 square foot Aldi Grocery Store as shown on Exhibit No. 1
with the remainder of this parcel to be developed at a future date as Phase 2 which would
be reviewed by the Zoning Board, This recommendation was subject to the conditions
itemized by the staff, including landscape perimeters, signs, access easement, outside storage
and access drive off of Harvest Lane, By a vote of 5-0 the motion passed.
PB:hg
John F. Dixon - Page
November 15, 1989
ZBA-77-SU-89, ZBA-78-V.89
Mr. David Beebee, developer for Lube -Pro, a quick oil change facility, indicated that
through an extensive survey, he found this site to be a good location for a quick oil change
facility. He stated that a tremendous market exists within a three mile radius. Current
statistics state that 8% of drivers use quick oil changes and that number is to increase to
40% by the 1990's.
As was stated to the Zoning Board, the Village staff has concerns with both the self -storage
facility and the quick oil change facility on this parcel. The oil change building, poses a re-
use problem should the business close at some time in the future. It was also staffs opinion
that there are other quick oil change facilities in the immediate neighborhood. There are
several disadvantages to the self -storage facility that were cited including:
1. No generation of sales tax.
2. There are other 1-1, Light Industrial, areas within the Village that would allow
for this use.
3. The location of this facility next to residential.
4. The compatibility of this use with the retail users on the same property.
Some advantages of a self -storage facility at this location is that it would provide a service
to the community, the lack of traffic that it would generate and the fact that it would
occupy an odd -shaped, vacant lot which does not have great visibility from Rand Road.
It was stated at the hearing that staff could not support either the self -storage facility or
a oil change facility, However, an amended PUD including a 12,000 square foot Aldi's
Grocery Store, 7,000 square foot freestanding retail building and future expansion of the
allowed uses in a B-3 District on this site could be supported with conditions. The
conditions are important and should be made part of any PUD approval including:
1. Perimeter buffers adequately landscaped and approved by staff.
2. The Sign Review Board reviewing and making recommendations of all signs
on the property.
3. An access easement should he granted between this subject property and Mr.
Kamysz's property on Rand Road.
4. No outside storage will be allowed at the rear of the Courtesy Building or
any other future building on this property.
5. The service drive access off of Harvest Lane as proposed will be deleted.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAX PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-77-SU-89, ZBA-78-V-89, COURTESY REAL ESTATE PROP.
LOCATION:
740 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE:
NOVEMBER 15 1989
Mr. Michael Shelly, Attorney representing the petitioner, appeared before the Zoning
Board of Appeals on November 9, 1989 to request the following:
1. A Special Use/Planned Unit Development to allow building expansion on the
Courtesy Home Center property, including a new grocery store of 12,000 square
feet, a 7,000 square foot future building for retail, a 68,742 square foot self -storage
facility and a 1,800 square foot quick oil change facility.
2. Variations to the PUD standards as follows:
a. Section 14.2503.A.6 to allow a zero foot setback along the north property
line instead of 25 feet.
b. Section 14.2503.A.8 to allow 502 parking spaces instead of 552 spaces for
a PUD.
c. Section 14,2503A11 to allow 87.5% of the lot to be covered with
impervious surfaces instead of 85% total.
d. Section 14.2503.13.3 to allow 22% of the gross area of the development to
be devoted to uses not normally permitted in the B-3 District, i.e. self -storage
facility and quick oil change facility. Twenty percent is the normally allowed
maximum.
Mr. Mike Vdovets, developer for self -storage facilities, indicated that this type of facility
would be a benefit to the homeowner and small business owner, while at the same time,
being a quiet use, compatible with residential areas. It was his opinion that this type of
user would be a good buffer between Rand Road and the Harvest Heights residential area.
Approximately, three to four vehicles an hour are anticipated to arrive at this facility. it
would consist of 600 units, the largest being the size of a one -car garage, and the smallest
being 5' X 5'. It would be open seven days a week from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. with a
manager on-site at all times,
vILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-77-SU-89, ZBA-78-V-89, COURTESY HOME CENTER
PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: 740 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE: NOVEMBER 30 1"9
The attached memo summarizes the findings of the Zoning Board of Appeals on a planned
unit development application filed by the owners of Courtesy Home Center.
The PUD request includes the following land -uses:
1. A 12,000 square foot Aldi's Grocery Store.
2. A 7,000 square foot retail building to be developed at a later date.
3. A self -storage facility and oil change facility on three acres.
.77 er W
oney Bee s te on and Road, adjacent to the Courtesy property,
rfflM IN "
",file or Tne To M,
You might r all that such an easement arrangement was discussed by the Village Board
anM Mr. Kamysz with his May 1989 Spiecial Use application,
The purnose of this memo is to adviie �gg 1ka '14
MRMWAWN�
However, the easement offer to Mr. Kamysz is subject to Village Board approval of the
original Courtesy PUD, not the amended plan approved by the Zoning Board.
DMC:hg
Courtesy Home Centel—
Page Two
December 28, 1989
1 1.
4. M=pal-dkQZ-L=S for pgdestdan traffic. from JIgpLtst Heigh15, to the i2a,rk-and bikg
Trustee Corcoran suggested that staff investigate providing a more direct point of
access from Harvest Heights to Kensington Center. This suggestion was made in
hopes of finding a way for pedestrians and cyclists to avoid the Harvest Lane and
Business Center Drive intersection.
It has been determined that the best point of access from Harvest Lane to
Kensington Center is at the rear of 411 Business Center Drive, This location would
be at the westernmost lot along Harvest Lane. Access to the park and bike path
would require easement approval by the owners of 411 Business Center Drive and
Cummins Allison. I have talked with the Director of Real Estate for Opus North
about this idea. He believes it is worth looking into, and is providing me with the
names of contact persons for the two properties. With direction from the Board,
staff can pursue this matter further.
DMC:c1
VIL AGE OF MOUNT PR4,,SPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
K V ---
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE; December 28, 1989
SUBJECT- Courtesy Home Center - Planned Unit Development
At the December 19 Village Board meeting, there was discussion about a variety of items
related to the proposed Planned Unit Development at the Courtesy Home Center. This
memo attempts to address these items:
1.&oss to Harvest . - Ldriveway:
Adjoining property owners are concerned about existing traffic patterns as drivers
exit the Courtesy property at Harvest Lane. Automobiles exit the Courtesy drive
and travel in the "most direct line" to the intersection at Business Center Drive. This
line of travel cuts across both traffic lanes of Harvest Lane. This movement can be
dangerous, and lead to congestion and poor traffic flow.
As a remedy, it is recommended that curbed median be installed in the Courtesy
driveway. With this median, exiting traffic will be required to make a more defined
left turn, reducing the chance of drivers traveling in the "most direct line" to Business
Center Drive. Also, Harvest Lane should be striped, to better define travel lanes.
This alternative has been discussed with the Engineering Department and they
concur that it is the best action to take.
2. -Facility:
The P.U.D. ordinance includes a section requiring the quick change oil facility to
be finished in face brick. Mr. David Beebe, of Lube Pro, indicates that the company
is attempting to build units with a certain identity, that are easily recognizable, and
different from their competitors. He is asking that the building be finished in a
textured split face block, with blue trim. Please see the attached letter and color
picture.
NMI "-w-m-M
Screened dumpster locations willbelocated at the east and west ends of the self -
storage facility. They will b6 placed out of the required Fire Department travel aisle.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS,740 EAST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, Courtesy Real Estate Properties (hereinafter referred to
as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect
to property commonly known as 740 East Rand Road (hereinafter
referred to as the Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot A in Reeses' Addition to Mount Prospect, a Subdivision of
part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 77 -SU -89) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 9th day of
November, 1989, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospefft Hergld on the 24th day of October,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings or
the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by the adoption of the
following ordinance regarding the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION QNBL That a special use permit be and is hereby granted
to allow Courtesy Real Estate Properties to construct a commercial
Planned Unit Development, in a B-3 (Business Retail and Service)
District upon the following described property:
Lot A in Reeses' Addition to Mount Prospect, a Subdivision of
part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of
Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
SECTION TWO: That the Planned Unit Development hereinabove
authorized and permitted shall be constructed pursuant to the site
plan #89-046 prepared by Kirk/Tyler Architects and submitted as
evidence and exhibits for ZBA Case No. 77 -SU -89.
SECTION THREE: That the Planned Unit Development includes the
following variations of the Planned Unit Development standards of
Section 14.2503:
A. A reduction of the required off-street parking from the
requirement of 503 spaces to 488 spaces, subject to final
determination on landscape islands and State requirements for
handicapped spaces.
A reduction of the required 251 setback behind the Courtesy
Home Center to 101.
ZBA 77 -SU -89
Page 2 of 3
C. An increase in the permitted total permitted lot coverage from
85% to 86%.
D. Allowing use exception totalling 22.2% of the site for a self -
storage facility and a quick change oil facility, as depicted
on the approved site plan. Planned Unit Development standards
establish a 20% maximum of the site are for use exceptions.
aE-CT�.qN FOUR-
. That development of the Planned Unit Development is
subject to the following conditions:
A. A final, detailed landscape plan be submitted prior to the
issuance of any building permits. Such landscape plan shall
include shade trees and substantial evergreen plantings at the
rear of the self -storage facility. Such landscape plan shall
be subject to the approval of the Planning and zoning
Department.
B. The Aldi's Food Center and quick change oil facility shall be
constructed of face brick on all four elevations.
C. The submittal to the Village of an executed agreement between
the Petitioner and the owner of Lot 1 in Kamysz Subdivision
specifying an access easement from the Planned Unit
Development to the adjoining Lot 1. Such agreement shall be
submitted prior to issuance of any building permits for the
Planned Unit Development.
D. The Planned Unit Development shall have common maintenance for
all structures and parking lots of the development.
E. Signage for all uses of the Planned Unit Development is
subject to approval of the Sign Review Board.
F. The Petitioner must submit an agreement providing for common
parking for the Aldi Food Center and Courtesy. This agreement
must be in perpetuity. Said common parking agreement must be
submitted prior to a building permit for Aldi's.
G. Outside storage at the rear of the Courtesy Center is limited
to the area designated on the site plan. Such storage area
shall be fenced.
H. Uses and activities in the self -storage facility are limited
as follows:
1. There shall be no car repairs done on site.
2. There shall be no auctions, garage sales or similar
activities conducted on the premises.
3. There shall be no storage of flammable liquids,
explosives or similar hazardous materials on the
premises.
It shall be the responsibility of the management of the
facility to enforce these conditions.
I. A STOP sign shall be placed at the driveway at Harvest Lane.
A prohibition on right -turns from this driveway is subject to
approval by the Engineering Department or Safety Commission.
ZBA 77 -SU -89 & ZBA 78-V-89
Page 3 of 3
The Petitioner shall install a curbed Median in the Courtesy
Center driveway at Harvest Lane, the purpose of such median
is to direct exiting traffic to make a more defined left hand
turn onto Harvest Lane.
SECTION _FIVE- This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
IMMIS
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. �Fields
Village clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
1 1990.
VI,,, -AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Paul Bednar, Plann Q,
ef
DATE: December 28, 19892
SUBJECT: Venture Store Parcel Redevelopment
LOCATION: 1500 South Elmhurst Road
May Properties are requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development for their property
at 1500 South Elmhurst Road. The request includes the following: r
1. Approval of an outlet for a Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant in the Venture store
parking lot, adjacent to Elmhurst Road.
2. Preliminary approval of a second restaurant, south of the Kentucky Fried Chicken
site.
3. An addition of 20,000 square feet for future retail development on the north side of
the Venture store.
May Property representatives appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Plan
Commission, and our Sign Review Board with various requests.
Win` oard of At�oeals:
May Property representatives appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on September
28, 1989 to request the following:
1. Amendment to the Special Use/Planned Unit Development in order to allow the
addition of two out lots in the under-utilized parking lot. One out lot is for a
Kentucky Fried Chicken fast-food restaurant with a drive-through. The remaining
out lot also for a fast-food drive-through restaurant yet to be leased. The
amendment to the P.U.D. would also include a future addition to the north side of
the existing Venture Store of approximately 20,000 square feet.
2. A variation from Section 14,2102.13 to allow a 20' parking lot setback instead of 30,
along both Elmhurst Road and Dempster Street and 0' parking lot setback instead
of 20' required on both the west and north property lines,
In 1.972 the site plan was approved as part of a P.U.D. for this property. The property,
as it exists now, was developed according to plan. Now that the May Properties wants to
intensify the uses on this site, they must both amend the previously approved P.U.D. and
also request variations to any zoning requirements not met.
ZBA-66-SU-89 December 28, 1989
Page Two
Susan Connolly, attorney for the May Properties, stated to the Board that no negative
impact is anticipated for the surrounding areas as a result of this redevelopment. It was
noted that this under-utilized site will now produce tax revenue for the Village.
Landscaping will be improved on the entire Venture parcel and an easement will be
provided across this property to supply Village water to the Mount Prospect Park District
building.
Staff support was expressed to the Zoning Board of Appeals. It was pointed out to the
Board that an increase in traffic movement into this site is anticipated. However, the
existing driveways should be able to accommodate this traffic. No new curb cuts or
driveways into the site are proposed. Parking will be adequate for the two new out lots
and building expansion to meet P.U.D. standards. Benefits for the Village would include:
1) Improved landscaping over the entire parcel, including the perimeter and also landscaped
islands within the parking lot; and 2) An easement for water and sewer for the Park
District; and 3) Tax revenue for the Village from the currently under-utilized area.
The Construction Engineer for Kentucky Fried Chicken was present to explain the proposed
restaurant building. His comments responded to the concerns of both the Board and staff
regarding the materials of the building, the dumpster enclosure location and design, and the
landscape design.
The staff recommended approval of the P.U.D. and perimeter variations with the following
conditions:
1. Petitioner landscape the property in one phase.
2. The Kentucky Fried Chicken parcel to be landscaped to meet staff approval.
3. The Sign Review Board review the sign proposals for the entire property and snake
findings prior to Village Board consideration. The future building addition on the
north side of the Venture store be limited to retail only.
4. Final plans for the second restaurant and building expansion be reviewed by the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
After some discussion, the Zoning Board of Appeals moved to grant: 1) An amendment to
the planned unit development to allow two new out lots on a portion of the parking lot
adjacent to Elmhurst Road. One out lot for a proposed Kentucky Fried Chicken drive-
through fast-food restaurant and preliminary approval for a second drive-through fast-food
restaurant, as yet unnamed, and a future building addition on the north side of the Venture
store consisting of 20,000 square feet, all as shown in Exhibit # l; and, 2) They also moved
to grant a variation from Section 14.2102.E to allow parking lot setbacks as shown on
petitioner's Exhibit #1. All were subject to the four conditions mentioned above, plus the
condition that the 20,000 square foot building addition be limited to retail only. Both
motions were approved unanimously 6-0.
"-�LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER D^AC-
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1990
SUBJECT: VENTURE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
As a follow-up to my attached January 11 memo concerning the dumpster locations at the
Venture store, I have discussed this issue with Attorney Susan Connelly.
Ms. Connelly advised me that she has spoken with Venture ownership about the matter.
Venture points out that the large dumpster on the south side of the building is near a
loading area, and not highly visible to any residential areas. Also, because of the size of
this unit, a screen or enclosure might create difficulty loading and unloading the dumpster.
Lastly, Venture notes that they have agreed to a number of revisions and conditions in the
PUD application. Venture believes that screening the dumpster could be costly, and that
this issue should not be brought up so late in the process, after all costs associated with the
PUD had been identified and approved by the company,
DMC:hg
Attach.
`,.—.LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPi,,eT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W—
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 11, 1990
SUBJECT: VENTURE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
At the January 2 Village Board meeting, Mayor Farley asked about the location of the
dumpsters at the Venture Store at 1500 South Elmhurst Road, and if these dumpsters were
in enclosures.
A check of the site finds three dumpsters. They are noted on the attached site plan.
Locations A and B are smaller dumpsters near loading dock areas. These units are not
highly visible. Location A is actually in a seldom used loading dock, and the dumpster at
Location B is under a projecting roof overhang. These two dumpster serve the temporary
Dempster Development Center and Enterprise Leasing.
Location C is a larger dumpster that serves the Venture Store. This unit is filled from
inside the store by a mechanical system. Its location is fixed, adjoining a storage room
inside the building. This larger dumpster projects out from the building, and is visible from
Dempster Street and the adjoining Park District property. The west side of this dumpster
could possibly be screened from the new Dempster Development Center. However, a
complete enclosure cannot be constructed, as large trucks must maneuver against this unit
for urdoading.
I have discussed screening this larger dumpster with Attorney Susan Connelly. I explained
how this might be beneficial for the new park district facility. She will discuss this with the
property owner and have a report to the Board on January 16.
DMC:hg
PLAT OF SURVEY
1i1
Vlo
ogm Lnu�re� A
bwoam LaLmwu C-
�
*+AlUQF 6Tb=
"�A�4F+�aTP�.1.taC.tei��A b-
E.NTirt[VWiE
s
;4
VENTURE STORE
�o
ol
ON
}qKJ
i
�s
_'-
'� _• pro
�
_ �—
ael
acrw.vaer. a rae..a
•- r w+a. �
-
`--tLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL-CT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 11, 1990
SUBJECT: VENTURE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
At the January 2 Village Board meeting, Mayor Farley asked about the location of the
dumpsters at the Venture Store at 1500 South Elmhurst Road, and if these dumpsters, were
in enclosures.
A check of the site finds three dumpsters. They are noted on the attached site plan.
Locations A and B are smaller dumpsters near loading dock areas. These units are not
highly visible. Location A is actually in a seldom used loading dock, and the dumpster at
Location B is under a projecting roof overhang. These two dumpster serve the temporary
Dempster Development Center and Enterprise Leasing.
Location C is a larger dumpster that serves the Venture Store. This unit is filled from
inside the store by a mechanical system. Its location is fixed, adjoining a storage room
inside the building. This larger dumpster projects out from the building, and is visible from
Dempster Street and the adjoining Park District property. The west side of this dumpster
could possibly be screened from the new Dempster Development Center. However, a
complete enclosure cannot be constructed, as large trucks must maneuver against this unit
for unloading.
I have discussed screening this larger dumpster with Attorney Susan Connelly. I explained
how this might be beneficial for the new park district facility. She will discuss this with the
property owner and have a report to the Board on January 16.
DMC:hg
MMMML (.&LATtom b-
F�iTEK4WSE
LECWW
-w.rve wr w w w
t
PLAT OF SURVEY
lou o*n►4aEa L
gulm
tiun►�Trst Lacezmr► L-
IDATU4E 6TbRE
g
.M..iM.rr�4da i..r...vearr
+NL M�019� a/eawrt geaw+�b P
.MnM Y16 tlft.lf aw,t w iR �fL Ra
l.RAY� w..e.tlM w• � wwq.r
t
ZBA-66-SU-89 December 28, 1989
Page Three
�%lw�t the direction Of Board:
Zoning Board of Appeals, May Companies presented a sign package
to the Sign Review Boardon both October 16 and December 18, 1989. Presently there are
two free-standing signs and one wall sign identifying the Venture Store that are non-
conforming and would have to conform by 1992. As a condition of the P.U.D. approval by
the Zoning Board, they have requested that all signs on this property be reviewed and
recommendations made by the Sign Review Board.
The Sign Review Board made the following findings for proposed signage in the P.U.D:
1. The two outlets be permitted to have a ground -mounted sign of 7' in height, to be
incorporated into the landscaped area. This was approved as a Special Use Equity
Option as May Companies are reducing the total signage on-site.
2. The existing free-standing signs shall be removed by January 1991. This is one year
earlier than the amortization schedule in our Sign Ordinance.
3. The new free-standing signs shall be a conforming 12' in height, with an approved
20% variation of sign area to allow a 60 square foot sign.
P -19a Commission:
On December 20, 1989, a representative of the May Company appeared before the Plan
Commission requesting relief from the following Development Code requirements:
1. Street lights along both Elmhurst Road and Dempster Street.
2. Parkway trees along both Elmhurst Road and Dempster Street.
Susan Connolly, representative of the May Company, explained to the Board that the cost
of both the street trees and street lights was a factor in this request and they did not feel
with the other improvements being made on site that they could afford to put in these
improvements. It was pointed out by the Village staff that parkway trees will cost
approximately $275 each. It was also pointed out by staff that street lights have always
been required by new developments or redevelopment projects in the Village. As in this
case, when I.D.O.T. will not allow the street lights to go in at this time, the Village has
required either a deed covenant or a cash escrow amount to cover the cost of installing the
street lights. This has become the common practice in the past six years. The Commission
members were of the opinion that the parkway trees would not cost the developer a
significant amount and, therefore, should be installed as part of the redevelopment. They
were also of the opinion that a deed covenant requiring the installation of street lights at
the appropriate time would be a good compromise. This would save the developer money
at this time. They were not in favor of waiving the requirement entirely. Therefore, the
Board recommended to deny the May Companies request to waive parkway tree
requirement and street light requirement for both Dempster Street and Dempster Road.
The vote was unanimous. There were no objectors present at the hearing to voice their
concerns.
ZBA-66-SU-89
Page Four
December 28, 1989
In summary, Village Board action is required in both the Zoning Board of Appeals
recommendation to amend a P.U.D. and to grant perimeter parking lot setback variations
and, also, Plan Commission action for the waiver of parkway trees and street light
requirements. The Sip Review Board findings should be made part of the Zoning Board
P.U.D. ordinance.
PB:cI
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 66 -SU -89, 67-V-89
Hearing Date: September 28, 1989
PETITIONER:
The May Properties
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 12, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1500 S. Elmhurst Road
Venture Store Parcel
REQUEST:
Approval of two outlots in parking
lot; one for Kentucky Fried chicken
and another for a second drive-thru,
fast food restaurant. Approval of a
future addition on the north side of
the Venture store and a variation
from Section 14.2102.E to allow a 20
foot parking lot setback and a zero
foot parking lot setback as noted in
text below.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Len Petrucelli
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
ABSENT:
Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
None
Ms. Susan Connelly, Attorney for the May Properties, 8000 Sears Tower,
Chicago, Illinois 60606, presented the Board with a copy of the site
plan indicating the 6.17 acre Venture store property. The request is
for two outlots to be incorporated in the under-utilized parking lot
adjacent to Elmhurst Road. One outlot has been leased to Kentucky
Fried Chicken, a Class 4, fast-food restaurant with a drive-thru. The
remaining outlot has yet to be leased. Landscaping will be improved
on the entire Venture parcel and an easement will be provided across
this property to supply Village water to the Mount Prospect Park
District building.
No new curb cuts are proposed to the property and there are adequate
utilities. All standards have been met with the exception of the
parking lot setbacks. It is requested that a 20 foot parking lot
setback be allowed instead of 30 feet along both Elmhurst Road and
Dempster Street, and a zero foot parking lot setback instead of 20
feet on.the west and north property lines.
ZBA 66 -SU, 67-V-89
Page Two
Ms. Connelly stated that no negative impact is anticipated for the
surrounding areas and aesthetics will be improved. It was noted that
an under-utilized site will now produce tax revenue for the Village.
It was requested that the street light requirement be excluded.
Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that the Special Use
requested is for two new outlots, and for expansion of 20,000 square
feet to the north of the existing Venture building. The variation is
for parking lot setbacks. The site was developed as a PUD in 1972 and
was built as approved. The property is zoned B-4, thus allowing for
fast-food, drive-thru restaurants as part of a PUD. Instead of the
normally required 30 foot setbacks along Elmhurst ad Dempster, the
applicant is proposing 20 foot setbacks and requesting that the
existing zero foot parking lot setback on both the north and west
property lines remain.
Although an increase in traffic movement into the site is anticipated,
the existing driveways will be able to accommodate it. No new curb
cuts are proposed. Parking will be adequate for the two new outlots
and meets PUD standards. Benefits include landscaping of the entire
parcel on both the perimeter and within the parking lot, an easement
for water for the Park District, and tax revenue from a currently
under-utilized area. Staff requested that the landscaping be done in
one phase as opposed to the two phases proposed.
Mr. Bednar expressed some concern for the landscaping on the Kentucky
Fried Chicken site and suggested that approval be contingent on
increased landscaping on-site, that the architecture be of a good
design, and the proposed dumpster be relocated away from the
drive-thru and moved north closer to the building with a fence
enclosure and a landscape screen around it.
There was reluctance from the Board to approve an as yet unnamed
restaurant in an undetermined location on the site and a future 20,000
square foot addition without any site plans. It was noted by Mr.
Bednar that the building expansion and the second outlot proposal
would have to come back before the Zoning Board for final approval and
suggested that approval be conditioned as such. It was further
explained that the current signs on the property are non -conforming
and suggested that the matter be sent to the Sign Review Board for
recommendations. Exclusion of street lights as requested will have to
be presented to the Plan Commission, not the Zoning Board.
Ms. Connelly explained that the site for the second outlot has been
selected as immediately adjacent to the Kentucky Fried Chicken
property, but a tenant is as yet unnamed. The 20,000 square foot
addition is a maximum expansion to the north and northeast of the
existing building. Venture is planning for the future and it was
thought best to have a whole picture available for review.
ZBA 66 -SU, 67-V-8'
Page Three
Mr. Rich Salzman, 2 Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 800,
Westchester, Illinois, Construction Engineer for Kentucky Fried
Chicken, displayed a rendering of the proposed building noting that it
would have a shingle roof, slate in color with a brick veneer.
Kentucky Fried Chicken would like to meet with Village staff and work
out a plan that the Village would support. It was requested that the
dumpster remain as proposed since traffic -wise for trash pickup, it
fits the design criteria. Also the dUmpster would be built out of the
same material as the building, it will not exceed six feet in height,
a gate will be placed in front shielding view into the dumpster and a
landscape screen will be added.
Ms. Connelly indicated that the Petitioner would be happy to work with
the Sign Review Board. There were financial reasons for the two phase
landscaping plan and discussions will continue with staff. It was
noted that a 15 year lease has been secured with Kentucky Fried
Chicken.
Upon motion by Ms. O'May, seconded by Mr. Brettrager it was moved to
grant an amendment to the Planned Unit Development at 1500 South
Elmhurst Road for approval Of two outlots on a portion of the
under-utilized parking lot adjacent to Elmhurst Road. One outiot is
for a proposed Kentucky Fried Chicken drive-thru, fast-food restaurant
and preliminary approval for a second drive-thru, fast-food restaurant
as'yet unnamed for the second outlot as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit
#1 subject to the Petitioner agreeing to work with Village staff on a
satisfactory landscape plan, a satisfactory site for the dumpster and
review of existing signs by the Sign Review Board-, and approval of a
future addition on the north side of the Venture Store consisting of
20,000 square feet as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1 provided that
the 20,000 square feet be used for retail merchandising only. Final
plans for both the unnamed restaurant site and the retail expansion
will come back before the zoning Board of Appeals.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager
Basnik, O'May
Nayes: None
By a vote of 6-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be
required.
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Ms. O'May, moved to grant a variation from
the provision of Section 14.2102.E to allow a 201 parking lot setback
instead of 30, along both Elmhurst Road and Dempster Street, and a
zero foot parking lot setback instead of 20, on the west and north
property lines as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1.
ZBA 66 -SU, 67-V-89
Page Four
Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Basnik, o'May
Nayes: None
By a vote of 6-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be
required.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD APPEALS HAIRMAN
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNE
SUBJECT:
ZBA-66-SU-89, ZBA-67.V-89, THE MAY PROPERTIES
LOCATION:
1500 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (VENTURE PARCEL)
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1989
REQUEST
The May Department Stores are requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Department
for their property at 1500 South Elmhurst Road. The request includes the following:
1. The approval of two outlots on a portion of the under-utilized parking lot
adjacent to Elmhurst Road. One outlot is for a proposed Kentucky Fried Chicken
drive-thru, fast-food restaurant. Preliminary approval for a second drive-thru, fast-
food restaurant is requested for the second outlot.
2. Approval of a future addition on the north side of the Venture Store consisting
of 20,000 square feet.
3. A variation from the provisions of Section 14.2102.13 to allow a 20 foot parking
lot setback instead of 30 feet along both Elmhurst Road and Dempster Street, and
a zero foot parking lot setback instead of 20 feet on the west and north property
lines.
■
The Police Department doesn't expect a significant increase in traffic accidents on
either Elmhurst or Dempster as a result of this proposal, as the proposal does not
include any new driveways. However, if traffic problems do occur, they recommend
"no left turn" signs be posted on site for autos exiting to Elmhurst.
2. Any detention, volume Aisplaced in the parking lot as a result of the proposed
construction, will, have to be compensated for elsewhere on the site.
3. Storm sewers located on site will have to be re-routed, The Engineering Department
should be contacted for locations of all utilities.
4. All Development'Code items are required including, but not limited to, street lights
and three parkway trees.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
September 20, 1989
5. Construction equipment must not harm the existing parkway trees.
I
NING Q2 1 1 7.121111D
Background
The Venture site was developed as a PUD as approved per Ordinance No. 2416 in 1972.
The Village staff has met many times with representatives of the May Company during this
past year to discuss additional development of this property. They are proposing a future
addition of 20,000 square feet to the north of the existing building. Also proposed are two
fast-food restaurants adjacent to Elmhurst Road to be located on an under-utilized portion
of the large parking lot. One of the fast-food restaurants will be Kentucky Fried Chicken
and the other is not yet identified. The property is currently zoned B-4 which does allow
for fast-food, drive-thru restaurants as part of a PUD. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan
identifies this entire parcel as being suited for community/commercial. This proposal is
consistent with the Land Use: Map. The Zoning Code's new yard setbacks must be met
because of the intensification that will result on the site. Since all new development will
be part of the large Venture parcel, the new setbacks must be met along the entire
perimeter. Instead of providing 30 foot setbacks as required by Code along Elmhurst and
Dempster, the applicant is proposing 20 foot setbacks to the parking lot. In addition, the
May Company is requesting to leave the existing conditions of a zero foot parking lot
setback on both the north and west property lines. In order to meet Code, the existing
parking lot would have to be removed 20 feet back from those two property lines.
A
he Planning and Zoning Department is of the opinion that the proposed uses will not alter
the essential character of the neighborhood or have a negative impact upon it. However,
a final site plan for the unnamed restaurant site and 20,000 square foot building addition
will have to be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals to make sure it meets our
standards. A thorough review of the site plan fails to identify any major problems. Issues
such as traffic flow, both on-site and off-site, an increase in traffic as a result of these users,
the impact on utilities, the compatibility of uses, and parking provided on site, have all been
investigated to our satisfaction. There are also benefits to the Village as a result of this
project. The landscaping of the entire Venture parcel will be improved, both on the
perimeters and in the parking lot itself. An easement will be provided across this property
to supply Village water to the Mount Prospect Park District building just west of the
Venture parcel. And finally, a large under-utilized parking area can now be developed to
generate tax dollars for the Village.
The May Company proposes no additional c urb-cuts onto Elmhurst or Dempster Roads as
a result of these two new outlots. It is staffs opinion that the traffic flow into and out from
this site is satisfactory. We do anticipate an increase in traffic on this site as a result of the
new development, however, the existing driveway cuts should accommodate the increase
adequately. The proposed outlots will require the interior circulation road on-site to be
relocated. The new location separates the outlots from the main parking lot, and serves to
better direct vehicular traffic.
Gil Basnik • Page 3
September 20, 1989
There is sufficient excess capacity on this Venture Parking lot to permit the development
Of the outlots, the expansion of retail, and the increased landscaping perimeters, and still
providing parking for all users exceeding the Village requirements. Once again, as a result
of the ring road realignment, all the required parking stalls will be located adjacent to each
user.
The petitioner is also proposing to increase landscaping on-site, by installing landscape
islands in the parking lot, and additional plantings along Dempster. This will be a major
improvement to the site. This is to be installed in two phases, which is acceptable to the
staff. However, most plantings are to be done in Phase 1, and it seems as if all work could
be done at this time.
The proposed 20 foot parking lot setback is reasonable and will provide a sufficient setback
from both Dempster Street and Elmhurst Road, However, additional landscaping is
recommended.
Leaving the existing zero foot setback on both the north property line and west property
line will not impact the adjacent property owners as the Commonwealth Edison easement
is located on the north and the Dempster Development Center is located to the west.
The site plan proposed for the Kentucky Fried Chicken building comes close to addressing
all of'our concerns. The parking provided meets Code. The parking lot layout is
acceptable. The drive-thru lane for Kentucky Fried Chicken has been designed at proper
width, has sufficient stacking space, and is separated from the parking lot for better traffic
flow. The only remaining concerns are itemized as follows:
1. Landscaping on the property must be increased
2. The architecture of the building should be of good design.
3. The dumpster shown on the plan should be relocated away from the drive-thru
lane. It should be moved further north closer to the building with a fence enclosure
and a landscape screening surrounding it.
is in ed. pported if landscaping
PB:hg
DC/CAF
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN AMENDMENT TO A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1500 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
WHEREAS, The May Properties 1975, In. (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed a petition for Special Use and variations
with respect to property commonly known as 1500 South Elmhurst Road
(hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 2 in Kenroy's Elmhurst -Dempster Subdivision, being a
subdivision of part of the East Half of Section 14, Township
41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
according to the plat thereof recorded May 16, 1973 as
Document No. 22327173, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 66 -SU -89) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
September, 1989, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prosy9ct Herald on the 12th day of
September,1989; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for variations
(designated as ZBA Case No. 67-V-89) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
September, 1989, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Heral on the 12th day of
September,1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on
the proposed Special Use and variations to the President and Board
of Trustees; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by the adoption of the
following Ordinance regarding the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property
the following:
1. That an amendment to a existing Planned Unit Development for
the subject property is hereby granted, said amendment
permitting the development of two outlots as depicted on the
project Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and
hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". The outlots are for
two fast-food restaurants with drive-thru windows, as follows:
A. The northernmost outiot is to be developed with a
Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant, as depicted on Site
and Landscape Plan ELMDEM dated 8/25/89 prepared by Penco
Associates, which plan is attached hereto and hereby made
a part hereof as Exhibit'"A". Detailed final landscape
plan is subject to approval of the Planning and Zoning
Department. The dumpster enclosure at Kentucky Fried
Chicken shall be a masonry structure matching the
building.
B. The southernmost outiot is to be developed at a future
F
ZBA 66 -SU -89 & 67-V-89
Page 2 of 2
time, subject to the verification as to use of the Zoning Board of
Appeals as to use, site plan, landscape plan and building design.
2. That an addition of approximately 20,000 square feet shall be
permitted on the north side of the Venture Store within the
permissible building area shown on the Site Plan (Exhibit "All
hereto) , subject to the approval of the Zoning Board of
Appeals as to Site Plan and building design. Such addition
shall be for retail -oriented use as is permitted in the B-4
District except that no automobile or motor vehicle -oriented
use shall be permitted.
3. That a variation to allow a 201 parking lot setback instead
of the required 301 along both Elmhurst Road and Dempster
Street shall be permitted.
4. That a variation to allow a zero foot parking lot setback
instead of the required 201 on both the west and north
property lines shall be permitted.
5. Signage for all buildings in the Planned Unit Develop is
subject to the findings of the Sign Review Board from their
meetings of October 16 and December 18, 1989.
6. Landscape improvements shall be done in one phase, as depicted
on Site Plan L-1 and L-2, Venture Store #18, prepared by May
Site Planning, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof of Exhibit "B", such improvements to be
completed prior to issuance of the occupancy permit for the
Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant on the northernmost outlot.
7. May Properties 1975, Inc. shall execute an easement with the
Mount Prospect Park District to permit the extension of a
sanitary sewer line for the benefit of the Park District
through and under the Venture parking lot in the location
shown on the Plat of Easement prepared by Paul Lotz, Land
Surveyor and dated October 27, 1989.
SECTION THREE: That the Special Use and variations granted herein
are subject to the Petitioner executing the Restrictive covenant
attached hereto made a part hereof as Exhibit "C", which
Restrictive Covenant guarantees the installation of public
improvements.
SECTION FOUR: That the Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
file a copy of this Ordinance and attachments with the Recorder of
Deeds or the Registrar of Titles, whichever is applicable.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT BY AND BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS AND
THE OWNER-DEVELOPER OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN SAID
VILLAGE REGARDING COMPLETION OF REQUIRED PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS PERTAINING TO T14F DEVE-InPUENT OF SAIDL PERTY
..
1500 South Elmhurst Road
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16 entitled "Development" of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois certain public improvements are required to be
constructed and installed by owners and developers of property within the Village, as part
of the approval for the development of such property; and
WHEREAS, the schedule for accomplishing the construction and installation of such
public improvements by the owner -developer of the property under development is often
in conflict with other public improvement projects adjacent to or within the vicinity of said
property so as to render the accomplishment of such public improvements by the owner -
developer to be practically or economically unfeasible until the same can be combined witb
or scheduled so as to conform with such other public improvements affecting the subject
property under development; and
WHEREAS, such other public improvement projects are administered by the Village,
County or State, officials over which the owner -developer has no control, and in some
instances those improvements to be accomplished by the owner -developer with respect to
the property under development cannot be completed until the other improvements under
Village, County or State control have been accomplished; and
WHEREAS, under such circumstances, it is deemed to be inequitable to delay
development of the property under development or to require the owner -developer to
establish a cash escrow, letter of credit or improvement bond for the purpose of guaran-
teeing the completion of required public improvements due to the delay caused by the
intervening or subsequent accomplishment of other public improvement projects under
administration and control of the Village, County or State; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 16 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois provides that
in lieu of a cash escrow, letter of credit or development bond, the owner -developer may
execute a restrictive covenant to be recorded and to run with the land as a guarantee that
the required public improvements shall be completed with respect to the property under
development.
NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the provisions of the said Chapter 16 of
the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, the Undersigned, Owner -Developer does
hereby covenant with the Village of Mount Prospect, an Illinois municipal corporation, as
follows:
1. The Undersigned is the Owner and Development of the following described
property within the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, to wit:
Lot 2 in Kenroy's Elmhurst - Dempster Subdivision being a subdivision of part of the
East,Half of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded May 16, 1973 as Document No.
22327173 in Cook County, Illinois.
2. A plan of development of the described property by the Undersigned has been
approved by the Village of Mount Prospect, which approval includes the completion of the
following public improvements contained in and provided as a part of the plans, to wit:
The purchase and installation of street lighting as required by the Village of Mount
Prospect and State of Illinois Codes.
3. For a period of twenty (20) years commencing from the date hereof, the
Undersigned shall undertake the above -stated improvements with sixty (60) days after being
so advised by the Village of Mount Prospect to commence such construction and instal-
lation work, and shall continue said work without interruption or delay, until the
improvements are completed in a satisfactory manner and in accordance with Village plans
and specifications pertaining thereto.
4. This Covenant to complete the said public improvements as herein contained
shall run with the said property; and for the period of time as set forth herein. Nothing in
this Covenant shall in any way prevent the alienation or sale of the subject property or any
portion thereof, except that said sale shall be subject to the provisions hereof and to the
plan of development pertaining to the property, and the new owner shall be both benefited
and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed.
S. This Covenant shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their successors and assigns in title and interest and the provisions hereof
shall be enforceable in a proceeding at law or in equity against the person or persons
seeking to violate the same including an action for injunctive relief, specific performance
or to recover damages or other fines and penalties as may be established in such violation.
In the event that the owner -developer of the subject property fails to complete the required
improvements or pay a proportionate share of the required improvements by other
contractors within the specified time periods herein, the value of such improvements shall
be entered as a lien against the property due and payable within sixty (60) days after
notification to proceed with the improvements.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this
_day of _1111111111111111111 , 19900 ;
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
Real Estate Index No. 08-14-403-023
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
2
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
-VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W_
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1990
SUBJECT: MOUNT PLAINES ANIMAL HOSPITAL
DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATIONS
At the January 16 meeting, the Village Board directed the staff to work with Dr. Dreessen
of the Mount Plaines Animal Hospital, to explore alternative methods of stormwater
management for a new parking lot.
The architect for the project submitted a revised engineering plan for the parking lot. This
plan eliminates the stormwater catch basin in the lot, and connection to the storm sewer
in Northwest Highway. The new plan provides for stormwater to be held in the parking lot,
and released at a restricted rate into the adjacent alley, by a "concrete flume."
The Inspection Services Department and Engineering Coordinator have reviewed this
alternative plan. Conceptually, the plan meets our stormwater requirements. However, a
final detailed plan with calculations would need to be submitted for final approval. Their
comments are attached.
The attached ordinance is scheduled for first reading. It provides for the 10 foot walks to
remain, with cut-outs to be provided for the required parkway trees. However, staff
recommends that the sidewalk be reduced to a 7 foot width, as previously stated.
The ordinance also addresses the new proposal for stormwater management, with final
approval of the design subject to review by the Village Engineer.
NUM
170
. 'SPtL+.ovy�o
X3.02 FlQ.4a •Sb tJQ6ar-�
avf Ptnti,�t. sa..Yae-
(.�� � Vvost52s- m6'fE.s1
+J b iz -r "
�tL1- � .•-mob ��. o � � �.�---�h �i
Vt21
Wr. v.. —Twl,
CM. pp....ei.O 4z�454F.�a rrerc.,
Village cf l������� ������������ `
/ �~ ~-
^
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: David Clements, Planning & Zoning Director
FROM: Chunk Bencic, Inspection Services Director
DATE: January 31, 1990
RE: 14T. PLAINES ANI14AL HOSPITAL PARKING LOT
As requested by the Village Manager, Bob Pszanka field checked the
area behind the Mt, Plaines Animal Hospital to determine if the latest
grading anddrainage plan submitted was acceptahle. Attached is a
copy of Bob's review comments. The first three (3) are informational
only and do fall within the limits of our codes. The 4th cumment
although not against any code, should be pointed out to the—developer
`
because if could cause him a problem.
One suggestion I would make is that the outlet of the 3" restr1otur
discharge to the ground so that some water can dissipate before it
reaches the alley or the proposed "flume" should be angled so that
it directs the discharge in the direction of flow in the alley instead
of discharging at 90° to the alley as shown on the proposed plan.
Chuck Bencic
CB:rm
Attach.
cc: Engineering
File
Village of lount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Director of Inspection Services
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: January 30, 1990
SUBJECT: Mt. Plaines Animal Hospital Parking Lot
Pursuant to you request, I have field checked the surrounding
properties as to drainage patterns. A revised plan, dated 1/26/90,
for paving this gravel lot proposes a discharge restrictor pipe at
its northwest corner. There is a 161 wide concrete pavement alley
immediately north of this lot. Natural drainage is in a west to
east direction towards George St. The alley is v -grooved, about
211 - 311 in 81, and directs overland flow in its natural pattern.
There is a single family home located north of this alley on the
west side of George St; An approximate 1211 high earth berm, on the
north edge of the alley, protects this house from any alley
drainage problems. The alley v -groove has cracked and allows water
to penetrate below the concrete. An asphalt patch across the width
of the alley, approximately halfway to George St., slightly impedes
flow in the v -groove.
As to the design of the detention in the parking lot, some
issues should be addressed.
1.) Volume calculations take into account only the parking
lot acreage not the contiguous property ownership. No
calculations were received to verify volumes.
2.) Using the high-water elevation, the pipe invert, and a
311 dia. pipe, I calculate a release rate of 0.19 cfs.
Plans indicate 0.088 cfs or 0.077 cfs.
3.) Proposed plan indicates a maximum ponding depth of about
1011 at N.W. corner of lot. Could be a problem for a
parked car at this location!
4.) There could be a problem of cars "bottoming" out at lot
entrance. Proposed slope of "drive apron" is about 8%.
Remainder of parking lot aisle and alley grade of 3%
could cause a problem.
Overall this proposed plan would satisfy ordinance require-
ments.
&L,
Bob
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16
ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY AS
888 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
WHEREAS, Dr. Donald Dreessen has requested modifications from the
Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for property
commonly known as 888 East Northwest Highway, as follows: to waive
the requirement for storm water detention in the parking lot provided
for the subject property; to waive the requirement for curbs and
gutters around the perimeter of the parking lot; to permit the
sidewalks to remain at the ten foot width rather than reduce them to
seven feet in order to provide parkway area for parkway trees; and to
waive the requirement for parkway trees; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modifications from the Development Code (Chapter
16) for the subject property and have forwarded that recommendation
to the President and Board of Trustees President; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have considered the
requests for modifications from the Development Code and
recommendation of the Plan Commission and have determined that the
best interests of the Village would be served in granting a compromise
to the modifications requested herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY; ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TY0-- That modifications from the Development Code (Chapter
16) are granted as follows:
1. To permit the existing ten foot wide sidewalks to remain
subject to portions of the sidewalk being cutout for the
purpose of allowing trees to be planted in the parkway.
2. To waive the requirement that parking lot detention be
,provided by a catch basin with a connection to the storm
sewer in Northwest Highway. However, storm water detention
shall be required in the parking lot in such a manner as to
restrict flow from the parking lot to the alley by a three
inch (311) restrictor in the curb with an outflow to a twelve
inch (1211) concrete flume, subject to the approval of the
Engineering Coordinator, and in substantially the same
design as depicted on the architectual drawing attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THE—E-E_ This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village clerk
VILAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA.I.V.90, DONALD M. DZIEDZIC
LOCATION: 103 SOUTH EDWARD
DATE: JANUARY 30, 1990
Mr. Dziedzic is requesting the following variations to allow the construction of a parking
pad in front of his garage:
1. Section 14.1102.A to allow a 0' front yard setback instead of 30 feet.
2. Section 14.1102.13 to allow 4.8" side yard setback instead of 5 feet.
Mr. Dziedzic originally requested a 14.8" side yard setback and zero foot front yard at a
Zoning Board of Appeals meeting in August of 1989. The Zoning Board recommended a
32.5" side yard setback, however, Mr. Dziedzic could not agree to those terms at the Village
Board level. He recently re-applied with the smaller side yard setback.
Mr. Dziedzic presented this new case before the Zoning Board of Appeals on January 25,
1990. He explained that he needs additional parking space because he has 4 licensed
drivers in his family, Mr. Dziedzic told the Board that after the Zoning Board of Appeals
meeting in August of 1989, he recalculated the setbacks to the side property line and found
that the compromise originally agreed upon of 32 1/2" would not be adequate for his needs.
Therefore, he decided to return to the Zoning Board requesting a 4.8" setback from the side
property line. He also stated that he did not want to construct the parking pad right in
front of his door, on the south side of the driveway. He indicated that he would be willing
to slant the new parking pad and driveway in such a way to direct water run-off onto his
own property.
The Village's position in this case was stated to the Zoning Board. The variation request
for the parking pad, in general, is reasonable since the petitioner's driveway is only 9 feet
wide and can only accommodate one car. However, the Village recommends a 3 foot
setback from the side lot line to avoid any drainage problem and/or damage to the
neighbor's property. The 32-1/2" compromise would also be acceptable. It was noted by
the Village staff that Mr. Dziedzic's survey of other driveways in this neighborhood indicates
that there are many homes in the neighborhood that have side driveways that are located
on or near the property line. These driveways lead to detached garages in the rear yards.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
January 31, 1990
This is not the same situation that Mr. Dziedzic has, where a driveway in the front yard
leads to an attached garage. There are not very many similar examples in the
neighborhood.
Mr. Basnik then read into the record a letter from Mr. George Morris, the affected
neighbor to the south, who was not present at the meeting. The letter stated that he
opposes the request of the 4.8" side yard setback and re -affirmed his willingness to abide
by the compromise of 32-1/2" reached back in August of 1989.
The Board members discussed the validity of the survey presented to them, the potential
drainage problems, the possibility of slanting the driveway for drainage and the aesthetics
of the proposed driveway. The majority of the Board members felt that because Mr.
Dziedzic agreed to a 32 1/2" setback in August, he should abide by it now. The Board then
voted 2-5 to deny this request. There were no neighbors in attendance to voice their
concerns of this case.
PB:hg
Approved:
t4VIIA /Yi. Cti�-114011'*�'-
David M. Clements, Director
" h"
vf
tin
d
_ ....
_ __ .......
FKpM WOE
�
. ..
Pke
_._
MOM Od
C
07
Ex�srM�la
ortiYEw�� 9,a
Fr,
wine/I
f F-
i)4 Ai _bZ1
90 1
9Q19
9415
?(Vs
9Q 1 S
QA
a WD 14h
ELM
14;
IN
10
U?4
-e
A ppkox
b C -E F F,
s
D iz I el W A,
L/ N
H 0 Q C:, IE
_,5
1,4 L 1'"', -n
W I L Ll A M
AJ LINA
f- P0 N T
t
st t)
ELM
14;
IN
10
U?4
-e
6 Q:o'
o c
,Z.-)* i '.1 1 r- h
le Cr 01 (11 ll
VILE -AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Gil Basnik, Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman
FROM: Paul Bednar, Planner"
�-- (
SUBJECT: ZBA-I-V-90, Donald M. Dziedzic
LOCATION: 103 South Edward
DATE: January 16, 1990
REQUEST:
Mr, Dziedzic appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 24, 1989 and
received approval for a 0' front yard and a 32-1/2" side yard in order to install a parking
pad next to his driveway. The Zoning Board also granted final approval for a 161/2' wide
driveway. At the Village Board level, Mr. Dziedzic requested a side yard of less than 32-
1/2" for the parking pad. The Village Board directed this case back to the Zoning Board
of Appeals for a re -hearing. The matter was originally republished for the October 26
Zoning Board of Appeals meeting, However, after that notice, the petitioner revised the
request to include a 4,8" side yard. At that point, it was determined that the request would
be scheduled for the January meeting. Therefore, variations are requested to Section
14.1102.A to allow a 0' front yard and Section 14.1102.13 to allow 4,8" side yard for the
parking pad.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS:
Village staff cautions that surface drainage must not be affected by the proposed parking
pad. No fill shall be placed along this property line. If the parking pad is allowed, the
surface must be at or below the existing grade.
The Engineering Department states that many of the homes in this neighborhood have what
is called a settling basin in their front yard for the sanitary sewer system. Over the years,
many homes have had this basin disconnected. It is not known whether the Dziedzic's
settling basin is still operable without inspecting the plumbing in the home. In any case,
whether the settling basin is being used or not, the Engineering Department is of the
opinion that driveway pavement could cover up some of the basin if constructed properly.
Another option is to just disconnect the settling basin which is now unnecessary.
ZBA-1-V-90 January 15, 1990
Page Two
PLANNING & ZONING COMMENTS:
As you may recall from the first hearing, the Dziedzic have a one -car attached garage with
a 9' wide driveway leading to it. Mr. Dziedzic expressed the desire to park a total of three
cars on his property. Therefore, he was requesting a parking pad off of the north side of
his driveway. The driveway width was also proposed to be 16-1/2' instead of 15', which was
subsequently approved by the Zoning Board. As for the parking pad, it was staff's
recommendation that a minimum 3' separation from the property line to the edge of the
drive be maintained mainly for drainage reasons. Widening of the existing driveway in
order to park an additional car was a reasonable request, if setback from the side property
line adequately. Neighbors were present at the hearing to voice their objections with the
original 14-1/2" setback from their property line. Mr. Dziedzic offered compromise which
was agreed to by Mr. Morris, the effected neighbor. The Board then voted to approve a
32-1/2" setback from the north property line. After that hearing Mr. Dziedzic did some
additional measurements and determined that the 32-1/2" setback from that property line
would not give him adequate space. Therefore, at the Village Board level Mr. Dziedzic
requested his original 14-1/2" setback. The Village Board did not vote on the case but,
rather, decided to send it back to the Zoning Board level for further review. Subsequently,
Mr. Dziedzic has modified the setback request to 4.8" from the side property line at the
closest point.
It is still staffs recommendation that a side yard setback of approximately 3' is preferred
in this instance. By applying this rule, Mr. Dziedzic could add almost 5' of pavement to the
north side of his existing driveway and appn,'�,ximately 2-1/2' to the south side of his existing
driveway for a total of 16-1/2' in width. ' °e original compromise agreed to at the ZBA
hearing by Mr. Dziedzic and the neighbor, Mr. Morris, of 32-1/2" setback would also be
acceptable to us.
Mr. Dziedzic has included a survey showing the distances of driveway from property lines
in his neighborhood. Out of all the addresses listed on this survey, the only driveways that
are either located on the property line, or close to the property line, are those driveways
which run up the side yard for access to a detached garage. There are not many instances
listed on this survey which match Mr. Dziedzic's situation of having a driveway/parking pad
in the front yard.
Copies of the Zoning Board minutes from August 24, 1989, memos and subsequent letters
from neighbors are attached for your review.
PB:cl
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 1-V-90 Hearing Date: January 25, 1990
PETITIONER: Donald M. Dziedzic
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 103 South Edward Street
PUBLICATION DATE: January 9, 1990
REQUEST: Variations from: Section 14.1102.A to allow a
zero foot front yard instead of 30 feet; and
Section 14.1102.13 to allow a 4.8" side yard
instead of 5 foot, in order to allow a parking
pad.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
Chairman Basnik introduced this case as being a request for a zero foot front yard instead
of 30 feet and a 4.8" side yard instead of 5 feet in order to allow a parking pad.
Mr. Dziedzic, petitioner, spoke on his own behalf explaining that he would like to widen
his driveway to 16 1/2 feet to the north edge of his current driveway for a parking pad.
The edge of the driveway would be 4.8" from his property lot line. He further explained
his need for this additional parking space because he has four licensed drivers in his family.
He emphasized the fact that he was not setting a precedent and presented a survey to the
Board members showing the number of residents in his neighborhood who had driveways
and/or pads similar to the one he is requesting.
Mr. Cassidy questioned Mr. Dziedzic as to his reason for returning to the Zoning Board of
Appeals with the same variation request that he had requested in August of 1989. At that
time he had accepted a compromise of a 0" front yard and a 32-11T side yard. Mr.
Dziedzic explained that after he went home and re -measured the entire area, he found that
his home was closer to the lot line than he thought so he would not have enough room for
a car on that pad. Therefore, he was not be able to accept the compromise he had agreed
to. He also felt he could not construct the pad on the south side of his home because this
would place his drive right in front of his door. He mentioned that he would be willing to
slant' the driveway in such a way to direct water runoff.
ZBA-1-V-90
January 25, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Paul Bednar, Planner, representing the Village, explained that the variation request for a
parking pad is reasonable since the petitioner's driveway is only 9 feet wide. However, a
3 foot, setback from the side lot line would be recommended by the Village to avoid any
drainage problems and/or any damage to the neighbor's property.
Mr. Bednar commented on the survey presented by Mr. Dziedzic, noting that the similar
examples of driveways indicated on the survey are side access driveways to detached garages
located in the rear yards, Whereas, Mr. Dziedzic has a driveway leading to an attached
garage.
Chairman Basnik then read into the record, a letter from George Morris, 101 South
Edward, a next door neighbor who was not able to attend the meeting. Mr. Morris
attended the former meeting and agreed to the 32 1/2" side yard compromise. His letter
reflected his opposition to this request of a 4.8" side yard and re -affirmed his willingness
to a:)ide by the compromise reached in August.
Some discussion ensued regarding the validity of the survey, the aesthetics of the driveway
if placed in front of the front door, the distance between the driveway and the neighbor's
home, the potential drainage problems, and possibility of slanting the driveway for drainage
purposes. Mr. Lannon addressed the Board on the importance of establishing a definition
of "parking pad" within the Zoning Ordinance. Driveways are currently exempt from side
yard requirements, and he felt there was no difference between a parking pad and driveway.
Mr. Bednar noted that staff has never interpreted a parking pad to be the same as a
driveway because the purpose of a parking pad is different from that of a driveway.
Therefore, when a parking pad is located in a required yard, then a variation is necessary.
Mention was also made regarding the on -street parking restriction, and the three -car
garages allowed in the Village. However, the majority of the members felt that because
Mr. Dziedzic agreed to a 32 1/2" setback, he should abide by it.
Mr. Lannon, seconded by Mrs. Brothers, moved to grant variations from Section 14.1102A
to allow a zero foot front yard and Section 14.1102.B to allow a 4.8" side yard in order to
allow a parking pad in Case ZBA-1-V-90 as per Exhibit No. 1
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Petrucelli, Lannon
NAYS: Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 2-5.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary,
*iLIAGE OF MOUNT PROSra"T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: RICHARD J. JOHNSON, PLANNING INTERN
SUBJECT: ZBA-53-V-89, DONALD DZIEDZIC
LOCATION: 103 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
DATE: AUGUST 17, 1989
REQLffiff
The applicant is requesting variations from:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 16 1/2 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot front yard in order to construct a Parking
pad.
3. Section 14.1102.11 to allow a 14.5" side yard for the parking pad.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMEM
The Engineering Division cautions that surface drainage must not be affected by the
proposed parking pad. A 3 foot setback from the property line is recommended to allow
for drainage. They also suggest installing the structure at the existing elevation. No
additional comments or objections were received from the Village staff.
MWENT-5
The Dziedzic's live in a single family home similar to other homes in the neighborhood.
There is a one -car attached garage which is at grade. There is also a 9 foot wide driveway
leading into the garage. Mr. Dziedzic is requesting to widen the existing driveway to 16 1/2
feet to accommodate an additional parked automobile. Technically, the Code allows a 15
foot wide drive, if centered in front of a one -car garage. Presently, the one -car attached
garage is 6.5 feet from the north property line.
If the Dziedzies require additional parking, the staff feels their alternatives are limited
due to:
1. Limited area for garage expansion/reconstruction
2. limited side yard required for driveway access
Gil Basnik - Page 2
August 17, 1989
ZBA-53-V-89
Widening of the existing driveway in front of the house may be the most practical way to
provide an additional parking space. The question the Board must address is whether an
additional space is warranted and if so, should it be placed 14.5" from the north property
line.
The neighbor to the north maintains landscaping right to the property line. A separation
of a little more than 1 foot between this landscaping and the new pavement will probably
not be adequate to ensure the health of the neighbor's landscaping.
Upon a field inspection of similar homes in the neighborhood, we found none had parking
pads similar to that proposed here. Only one, possibly two other homes, had driveways
wider than 12 feet. The current garage and driveway space on the described property will
permit at least two vehicles to park off-street. The petitioner should address whether a 15
foot width will help solve his problem. If a variation is granted for the driveway width and
setbacks, a hardship must be established.
In summary, the Dziedzic's don't have many reasonable alternatives other than an expanded
driveway width, if they are to provide additional parking on their property. However, the
question the Board must answer is whether or not an additional parking space is necessary
and if so, how close should it be to the north property line. The precendent has not been
set for a similar parking pad in this neighborhood. We would recommend a 3 foot
minimum setback from the north property line if the Board considers approval.
RJJ:hg
Approved:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 53-V-89
Hearing Date: August 24, 1989
PETITIONER:
Donald and Elaine Dziedzic
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 9, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
103 South Edward Street
REQUEST:
Variations from Section 14.3016 to
allow a 16h' driveway, Section
14-1102.A to allow a zero foot front
Yard for a parking pad, and Section
14.1102-B to allow a 14h" side yard
for a parking pad.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
Len Petruceiii (8:15 p.m.)
ABSENT:
Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
George Morris
Carl Maas
Barbara Paulus
Michael DeShore
Mr. Donald Dziedzic, 103 South Edward, Mount Prospect, Petitioner,
stated he would like to widen his driveway in order to allow parking
for the four licensed drivers in his family. There is currently a one
car garage and three cars cannot be parked on the drive and parking is
not allowed in the street.
Mr. Richard Johnson, Intern Planner for the Village, indicated that
the Petitioner owns a single family home with a one -car attached
garage with a 91 wide driveway. The request is; to widen the driveway
to 16h' to accommodate an additional parked vehicle. The garage is
currently 6.5 feet from the north property line. The alternatives to
this request are limited due to area and side Yard space. The
proposed plan seems to be the most practical. Precedent has been set
within the neighborhood with Mr. Dziedzic recording approximately 12
other similar situations. It was noted that the neighbor to the north
does not agree with the 14k, side yard.
ZBA 53-V-89
Page Two
Mr. Basnik introduced several letters from neighbors objecting to
this proposal. They are from: Mr. Hollis, 102 S. George; Mr. Morris,
101 S. Edward; Mr. Van Dyke, 22 S. Edward; Mr. McGillicat, 105 S.
George; and Mrs. Seegersall, 100 S. George.
Mr. George Morris, 101 South Edward, neighbor to the north, urged than
the variation be denied or significantly modified prior to approval,.
Mr. Morris suggested that Code be followed as the proposed .plan would
be unsightly and out of character with the neighborhood. The
objection is to all the widening taking place to the north and
encroaching to within l° of his property line directly beneath his
bedroom window.
Mr. Carl Maas, 117 South Edward Street, Mount Prospect, agreed with
all letters of objection indicating that it will be a long-lasting
solution to a short-term problem.
Mr. Barbara Paulus, 102 South George Street, stated her objection to
this proposal. She had solved a similar situation of too many cars by
renting a garage in the neighborhood.
Mr. Michael DeShore, 100 South Edward, voiced his objection to the
proposal.
Two letters of approval from neighbors directly across the street were
presented to the Board. Mr. Driedxic explained that he currently has
two cars with four drivers,•but expects to add another car.
Mr. Lannon stated that this case is an over --application of toning
laws. Zoning Code does allow for drives in nide yards. Side yards;
are measured from the applicable lot line to the building; a driveway
does not constitute a building or a structure. The driveway does not
meet the Village's definition of a structure or building which are
specifically prohibited in required setbacks in yards.
Mr. Bednar stated that the drive is not what is being located in the
side yard. A parking pad, will be located there which has been
interpreted as a structure. When parking a car on a paid, it is
different then just having an access drive from the garage to the
street.
Mr. Lannon read the Zoning definition for structure as follows: "any
construction or any production or piece of work artificially built up
or composed of parts joined together in some 'definite manner." Mr.
Lannon argued that a paarking pad demes not meet the common definition
for a structure near does it meet the Zoning definition for structure.
Mr. Driedric offered to bring his driveway in 1h," from the proposal.
Setback will now be 218h" from the lot line.
ZBA CASE 53-V-89
Page Three
It was the consensus of the Board that Mr. Dziodzicts offer was
reasonable. The proposal will now allow for almost 31 of side yard.
Mr. Brettrager suggested that the 1'1 taken from the north side be
allowed on the South side of the drive in order to give the Petitioner
a useable driveway. The Board approved allowing a 320 setback from
the north lot line and at the option of the Petitioner, allowing the
1�1 to be added to the South side of the drive. Mr. Basnik noted the
hardship of the Petitioner in having only a one -car garage.
Mr. Lannon, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant a variation
from Section 14.3016 to allow a 16hl driveway instead of 151 normally
allowed for one car garages as shown on Petitioner's amended Exhibit
41, provided it is done in conformance with Village specifications.
Upon roll call: Ayes: PetrUcelli, Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager
O'May, Basnik
Nayes: None
By a vote of 6-0, the motion for the driveway width passed. The
Zoning Board is final on this portion.
Mr. Petrucelli, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to enter this case
as Z-53-89.
Upon roll call: Ayes; Petrucelli, Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager,
O'May, Basnik
Hayes: None
Upon motion by Ms. O'May and seconded by Mr. Brettrager, it was moved
to grant a variation from Section 14.1102-A to allow
a zero foot front
yard for a parking pad instead of 30 feet and from Section 14.1102.8
to allow a 32� inch side yard for a parking pad instead of 5 feet
normally required by Code as shown in Petitioner's Exhibit *1.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brettrager,
O'May, Basnik
Nayes: Lannon
By a vote of 5-1, the notion passed. Village Board action will be
required for this section.
Mr. Lannon indicated his no vote was due to his disagreement with the
interpretation being applied in this case with respect to parking pads
in side yards and front'yards.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
--VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-2-SU-9Q ZBA.3.V.90, COURTYARD CONSTRUCTION CO
LOCATION: 800 KENNICOTT PLACE, LOT #20
DATE: JANUARY 30, 1990
The applicant has requested the following:
L A special use per Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow a three -car garage of 704 square
feet;
2. A variation from Section 14.3016.A-3 to allow a drive width of 29'6" at the
garage instead of a maximum 21 feet.
Mr. Michael Schwartz of Courtyard Construction presented this case to the Zoning Board
of Appeals on January 25, 1990. He explained that this was to be the last new home in the
20 -lot Courts of Kennicott Subdivision. A three -car garage is being requested since the
size and price of the proposed house are more marketable, if a larger garage is part of it.
He noted that there are already two homes in, this subdivision with three -car garages and
wider driveways, similar to the one requested. He further explained that the wide portion
of the drive is located only nearest to the garage as it is the turn -around area for the three -
car garage. The main driveway approaching Kennicott will only be 20 feet wide.
The Village has no objection to this case. It was noted that if the three -car garage is
justified then a wider driveway width is necessary. Clarification was requested by a Board
member regarding the lot surface coverage, to which the staff stated the entire lot is 36%
covered, well under the maximum allowed by Code.
The Board then approved both the Special Use and variation by an unanimous 6-0 vote.
There were no neighbors or objectors present to voice their concerns in this case.
Approved:
David A uements, Director-
I - - - "w vao, At a 0 dam A*
OF LOT 20 lN 'tOkAT" OF KENMCOT-r, BEND A SL4)DrVkrgoN N THE r- - Kj OF
SECTION 15, TOWNS THE NORTW-UT QUARTER OF
I NORTK RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THM pFa4m NE)UDLAM, IN COOIC COUNTY, X,14otG,
CORDM TO THE pt_A, TNEREOF FLEA pi TNE OFFICEAc-
OCTOM 1907OF THE REGISTRAR OF TrrLEs OF COOK COUNTY, LLNO*� O��
30, , AS DOCUk*)4T NO. LR -36637". KNOWN AS WO KENNICOTT PLACE.
NOTES TO*AL IMPERVIOUS AREA OF LOT -S&3%
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - 4570 So FT
TOTAL LOT AREA12,802 50 FT
27 TOTAL MPERVIOUS REA FRONT YARD' 2tl S %
cR+ le IN FRONT LAWN- 540 SO FT
TOTAL FRONT YARD' 2516 So FT
SCALE , 1* - 20'
Boa
M -02* -w
647 %l
SL
3i
I 28
�n
T�
O
0f LACE rn
#WO
z
31
66
4� s 63
96
TOP OF FOUNDATION a 699 10
FINISH ��JL GRACE ADACENT 10
20
FOLNOE
A 68 40
4
1 40
4
4G
II
147,66 R
s4
S, ag* 551,
20, P(AL#c LqtjTx"s.
FOR MiTlILS
MAW
25- j
7a
NOTES,
pp4
ALL OJT DAZIED ON I -Oft rE
MS 2,J W—OT&M AT ALL LOT ORNE��
HEREON
IMMIMMMIIIIEgy
'lost
C -n
..93
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 2 -SU -90, 3-V-90
Hearing Date: January 25, 1990
PETITIONER:
Courtyard Construction
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
800 Kennicott Place
PUBLICATION DATE:
January 9, 1990
REQUEST:
A Special Use per Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow
a three -car, 704 square foot garage and a
variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a
drive width of 29'6" at the garage instead of a
maximum 21 feet.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
ABSENT:
Lois Brothers (Left At 10:00 p.m.)
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
None
Chairman Basnik summarized the requests in this case as being a special use request for
a three -car, 704 square foot garage per Section 14.1101.C.6 and a variation from Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow a drive width of 29'-6" instead of the maximum 21 feet.
Mr. Michael Schwartz, Vice President of Courtyard Construction, 1655 N. Arlington Heights
Road, Arlington Heights, IL was sworn in and presented the case to the Board. He
explained this was a new home in their 20 -lot subdivision where a three -car garage was
requested. There are already two homes in
this
is su
bdivi
sion
with three -car garages andw, e driveways ay, nd islast 0ee constructed.He further explained that the V'p0'onofthe driveway
would fall behind the front yard as it is the turn -around area
for three -car garage. e in driveway comingfrom
the curb to the 30 foot setback
line is feet which is the 21footrequirement.
to Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner, stated the Village had no concerns with this request. He re-
affirmed the granting of similar requests to two other cases in this subdivision. He
emphasized that the special use request must meet the special use standards.
ZBA-2-SU-90, ZBA-3-V-90
January 25, 1990
Page 2 of 2
110 1111OW
WN; ,
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant the petitioner's request in Case
ZBA-2-SU-90 for a special use per Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow a three -car, 704 square foot
garage, per petitioner's Exhibit No. 1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6.0.
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mrs. O'May, moved to grant the petitioner, in Case ZBA-3-V-
90, a variation from Section 14-3016.A-3 to allow a drive width of 29'-6" at the garage, per
Exhibit No. 1.
Upon roll call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER *_ V--)
SUBJECT: ZBA-2-SU-90, ZBA-3-V.90, COURTYARD CONSTRUCTION CO.
LOCATION: 800 KENNICOTT PLACE, LOT #20
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1990
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting the following:
1. A special use per Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow a three -car garage of 704 square
feet;
2. A variation from Section 14.3016.A-3 to allow a drive width of 29'6" at the
garage instead of a maximum 21 feet.
VILLAGE STAFF CONWEM
The Engineering Department motes that the large driveway must not block drainage from
adjacent lots. No other comments or objections were received regarding this case.
DQJMMEM
This lot is one of the 20 single family lots in the Courts of Kennicott Subdivision. It is
located on the southwest corner of Lonnquist and Kennicott. The requests presented are
very similar in nature to those approved for 903 and 801 Kennicott Place, directly across
the street. The principal request is that of a special use for a three -car garage. The special
use standards must be reviewed for this application.
For your information, a special use permit and variations were approved for both 801 and
903 Kennicott Place for the following:
1. Three car garages, 730 sq. ft. in size;
2. Wider driveways similar to the one proposed in this case.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
January 17, 1990
If a three -car garage is granted by special use, a variation for the driveway width will be
necessary. Since this is a side load garage, the extra wide width for the driveway will be
required as indicated on the site plan. The proposed 704 square feet in size of the garage
would not necessarily be required for a three -car garage, therefore the petitioner must
justify this size. For your information, the total impervious lot surface coverage proposed
is 36.3%. The impervious surface of the required front yard is proposed to be 20.9%. Both
percentages fall within allowed ranges.
In summary, the petitioner must meet the standards set forth in the special use section for
the three -car garage. If the three -car garage is approved, it necessitates a wider than
allowed driveway. However, the size of the garage of 704 square feet must be justified.
PB:hg
`VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPLC'T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-4-V-90, JAMES AND CLEO ATHANS
LOCATION:
1000 SOUTH NAWATA
DATE:
JANUARY 31, 1990
The petitioners are requesting variations from the Zoning Code in order to allow an
existing shed to remain in its present location. Variations are requested from the following:
1. Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a shed located 4-1/2 feet from the house instead of
10 feet.
2. Section 14.102.13.3 to allow a 10-1/2 feet shed height instead of 10 feet.
3. Section 14.102.8.2 to allow a 2-1/2 foot side yard setback from the shed to the
property line instead of 5 feet.
Mary Athans presented the case to the Zoning Board of Appeals on January 25, 1990 on
behalf of her parents. She explained to the Board that they constructed a shed without a
permit not realizing that one was needed. After the shed was built they were told it was
not in compliance with Village Codes. She emphasized that there is a hardship of cost and
labor to remove or relocate the shed at this time. She also mentioned that they were
willing to line the shed with required drywall for fire safety reasons, if that were a condition
for approval.
The Village's position was presented to the Board stating that there are a number of other
locations in the fenced -in rear yard to relocate the shed. Leaving the shed in its present
location, not only necessitates variations but increases the fire safety hazard and impacts
the neighborhood as it is clearly visible from the street. Staff recommended that this shed
be relocated to another portion of the lot so no setback variations would be necessary. The
height at 10 1/2 feet was minor and not a concern.
A number of neighbors spoke to the Zoning Board objecting to this shed and its present
location. It was their general consensus that the shed, located in the side yard, distracts
from the neighborhood, does not fit in with the attractiveness of the neighborhood and
should be moved to the fenced -in rear yard.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
January 31, 1990
Chairman Basnik also read a letter from neighbors who objected to the shed and felt it
should be relocated. A petition with 20 names requesting that the shed be moved from its
present location was mentioned. After some discussion about relocating the shed, the
Board was of the opinion that the present location of the structure impacts the
neighborhood. The Board believed the shed should be moved to a conforming location in
the rear yard. The Board voted 0-6 denying the requested setback from the house. They
then voted to approve the 10 1/2 foot height by an unanimous 6-0 vote; and lastly denied
the 2 1/2 foot side yard setback by a vote of 2-4.
PB:hg
Approved:
David M. Clements, Director
I �vl
with brick sts
61 Wood fence..
0
8 Z
O-Cq,ed
0A
4A
TZ-1
�
00 %
75
O'.4"SotrrN
o
ot 8. C""Corre
-1-1 411r.
Ian -Braun's Fourth
Of Pr
be�3O
nt
52 bin
iYaPsio
n O
f hart o
f the N1,
ion Sub- e 3rd Princl
LegaI D�sOrJect, Unit. ganga 11 East of
to fist. prosp41 North,
Township Illinois.
of sectnin4Look County,
Meridian
ILLAGE OF MOUNT PRO&_,,. r
MANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIV%, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
'Lt�ljl 1-
SUBJECT. ZBA4-V.90, JAMES AND CLEO ATHANS
LOCATION- 1000 SOUTH NAWATA
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1990
REOVE
The applicants are requesting the following variations:
1. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a shed located 4-1/2 feet from the house instead of
10 feet as Code requires.
2. Section 14.102.13.3 to allow a 10-1/2 feet shed height instead of 10 feet.
3. Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 2-1/2 foot side yard setback from the shed to the
property line instead of 5 feet required by Code.
W'4101 Ur I'T' I A 44 Q
Both the Engineering and Inspection Services Departments note that the existing drainage
pattern and swales must not be altered. No fill can be placed along the property line unless
a separate grading plan is submitted and approved by Engineer. Due to the proximity of
the shed to the house, this shed should be lined with 5/8" Class X drywall for fire safety
reasons. The Inspection Services Department also notes that this shed was constructed
without a building permit.
The applicants live at the comer of Nawata and Golf Road. They have constructed a shed
without a permit. It is located on the south side of their home in the required side yard,
outside of the fenced -in rear yard area. There are other locations within the rear yard to
locate this size shed and still meet setback requirements. The main question that we have
is why it cannot be located in one of these other locations. Granted, by relocating the shed
in the rear yard, it would be more visible from the Athans' patio, however, this is not a
hardship. By leaving the shed in the present location, not only increases the fire safety
hazard, but also impacts the aesthetics of the neighborhood, and specifically the neighbor
to the south.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
January 17, 1990
We recommend that this shed be moved to another location in the rear yard that would
meet Code requirements, thereby, eliminating the impact on the neighbors and the fire
safety concern. With regards to the height of the shed, the applicant must establish a
hardship why ten feet is not adequate. I
In 1984, Mr. Athans received a variation per Resolution Z41-84, to install, a 6 foot high
wood fence as shown on his site plan. -
PB:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 4-V-90
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: January 25, 1990
James and Cleo Athans
1000 South Nawata
January 9, 1990
Variations from: Section 14.102.B.1 to allow
a shed located 4-1/2 feet from the house instead
of 10 feet; Section 14.102.B.3 to allow a 10-
1/2 foot shed height instead of 10 feet; and
Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 2-1/2 foot side
yard setback from the shed to the property line
instead of 5 feet.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
Lois Brothers (Left meeting at 10:00 p.m.)
Edward Capua, 2516 Shiela, Franklin Park, IL
Adolph Sitkiewicz, 1003 Nawata
Leonard Blazek, 1009 Nawata
Angela Biancalana, 1005 S. Nawata
Chairman Basnik introduced this case as being variation requests to allow -a 1041/2 foot
high shed to be located in the side yard, 41/2 feet from the house and 2-1/2 feet from the
property line.
Mary Athans spoke on behalf of her parents, explaining to the Board that they constructed
a shed without a permit in what they thought, was their rear yard. They are located on the
comer of Nawata and Golf, having a Nawata address and a front door facing Golf Road.
She commented that the shed was built by her father, brother-in-law, and a friend who were
not aware that a permit was needed to construct a shed. After the shed was built, they
were told it was not in compliance with Village Codes and variations must be sought. She
emphasized a hardship of cost and labor to remove or relocate the shed at this time, and
expressed bewilderment that the complainants did not come forward before the shed was
finished. She also mentioned that they were willing to line the shed with the required
drywall for fire safety reasons.
ZBA-4-V-90
January 25, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Paul Bednar, Planner representing the Village, stated that the petitioner had space to
construct the shed in the fenced -in rear yard. Erecting the shed in its present location
necessitated variations. By allowing the shed to remain in this location, not only increases
a fire safety hazard but also impacts the neighborhood as it is clearly visible from the street.
Chairman Basnik opened the meeting to the public. Mr. Edward Capua of 2516 Sheila,
Franklin Park, spoke on behalf of his father Edward Capua, who resides at 1002 Nawata.
He stated that ignorance of the law is no excuse and objected to the shed being built in the
side yard. He felt that they had a large back yard completely enclosed by a fence where
the shed could have easily been constructed.
Mr. Adolph Sitkiewicz, 1003 Nawata, objected to the unsightly appearance of the shed
which is very visible to him as he lives directly across the street. He described the shed as
a very large, barn -like structure and distracts from the neighborhood. He was also
concerned that this would set a precedent in what is now a beautiful neighborhood.
Mr. Leonard Blazek, 1009 Nawata, stated he was present more as a concerned neighbor
than directly affected by the shed. He felt that they knew where their back yard was and
should not be allowed to impact their neighbors with such an unattractive structure.
Ms. Angela Biancalana, 1005 S. Nawata, objected to the shed and felt it should be moved
to the rear yard.
Chairman Basnik then read into the record a letter from Edwin and Jane Burhop of 906
Palm Drive who also objected to the shed and felt it should be relocated to the rear yard.
He also mentioned that he had a petition with 20 names requesting that the shed be moved
from its present position.
There was some discussion as to the type of structure it was, the assembly of the structure,
aad the possibility of an easy relocation. The consensus of the Board members was that
the shed, in its present location, does impact the neighborhood, and if relocated to the rear
yard, the fence would screen the shed to some degree, and no setback variations would be
required.
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Petrucelli, moved to grant a variation from Section 14.102.8.1
in Case ZBA4-V-90 to allow a shed 4-1/2 feet from the house as per petitioner's Exhibit
No. 1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: None
NAYS: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 0-6.
ZBA4-V-90
January 25, 1990
Page 3 of 3
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant the petitioner's request for a
variation from Section 14.102.8.3 in Case ZBA4-V-90 to allow a 10-1/2 foot shed height
as per Exhibit No. 1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petruceffi, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. With this motion, the shed could be relocated to the rear
yard, with this approved height.
Mrs. O'May, seconded by Mr. PetruceUi, moved to grant a variation from Section 14.102.8.2
in Case ZBA-4-V-90 to allow a 2-1/2 foot side yard setback from the shed to the property
line as per Exhibit No. 1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Brettrager
NAYS: PetruceRi, Cassidy, O'May, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 2-4.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary,
`—VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-9-V-90, JOSEPH AND JANE REIBEL
LOCATION: 4 NORTH PINE STREET
DATE: JANUARY 31, 1990
The applicants are requesting variations from the following:
I. Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 3.5 foot side yard for an 11 foot long wall
projection instead of 5 feet normally required.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a front yard setback of 23 feet for a porch and a 28
foot front yard setback to the building wall instead of the required 30 feet.
Mr. Reibel, the owner of the property, appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on
January 25, 1990 to present his case. He testified that he received a permit from the
Village to build this two-story house. The permit was issued with the front yard and side
yard encroachments. After the foundation was poured, the Village became aware of the
encroachments. The variation application was necessary to allow the encroachments to
remain.
Mr. Reibel stated to the Zoning Board that if he had to change the plans and reconfigure
the foundation and walls at this point it would cause him financial hardship, He pointed
out that he is within the Code as far as the height of the home and only in violation of the
side yard setback for an 11 foot wall projection. This 11 foot wall section provides a 3 1/2
foot setback from the property line, Mr. Reibel noted that, as far as the front yard setback
was concerned, his home was set back as much as his other neighbors' in the block. In fact,
his home is set back further than his neighbor's home at 2 North Pine.
The staff memo sent to the Zoning Board of Appeals was summarized at the meeting. It
was noted that the building permit showing these encroachments was originally issued in
error. It was further stated that, when the error was detected, measures were taken to
schedule a hearing to consider the variations as soon as possible. The staff pointed out
that the requests were reasonable as the 11 foot wall section in the side yard is 12 1/2 feet
away from the neighboring house at 2 North Pine. Two 50 foot wide lots such as these, 2
and 4 North Pine, could each have 5 foot side yards, making the distance between homes
John Fulton Dixon - i -ge 2
January 31, 1990
a minimum of 10 feet. Whereas, in this case, the distance is 12 1/2 feet. It was
emphasized that the variation was for an 11 foot section of a wall and not the entire 48 foot
wall length of the structure. Two similar cases were approved in 1989, indicating similar
circumstances in the Village, These two cases involved expansions of attached garages to
be located 3 1/2' and 3'-4" from their respective side property lines. These cases, and other
similar requests, are noted in the attached memo.
As for the variation from the front yard setback, it was pointed out that this home is not
any closer to the street than the other homes on Pine Street and therefore, conforms with
the existing pattern of the block and character of the neighborhood.
Neighbors from 2 North Pine and 6 North Pine were present at the hearing to voice their
objections to these requests, Mr. & Mrs. Ward of 2 North Pine presented a letter to the
Board outlining their concerns. They were objecting to this request on the basis of lack
of light, drainage problems, lack of fresh air, potential placement of utility units in the side
yard, noise echoing between the buildings, and a fire hazard having buildings too close
together.
After a lengthy discussion, the Zoning Board members felt that action should have taken
by the Village to stop the work until the Zoning Board outcome was determined. Mr.
Unnon did not have a problem with the substance of the case but had a concern with the
handling of the matter by the Village. This was the general opinion of the other Board
members, The Zoning Board members felt that a negative vote by the entire Zoning Board
would send a message to the Village Board regarding the handling of the case.
The Board then voted 0-7 denying the 3.5 foot side yard as requested. The Board voted
unanimously 7-0 to approve the front yard setback of 23 feet to a porch and 28 feet to the
front building line as per Exhibit No. 1.
PB:hg
Approved:
AM4 A!4�,A�
Uavid M. Clements, irector
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNERe"
DATE:JANUARY 30, 1990
SUBJECT: PRECEDENT ZONING CASES FOR SIDE YARD
ENCROACHMENTS
The following is a list of other Zoning Board cases for the last five years in which a
variance was granted for a side yard encroachment involving a principal structure. From
the log books it did not appear that there were any similar requests during this period that
were denied by the Village Board,
1. 51-V-89, 128 Waverly Lane - A variation to permit a 3'6" side yard instead of 6.5'
for a garage *addition.
2. 29-V-89, 805 S. WaPella - A variation to allow a 3'4" side yard instead of 7.5' for an
expansion of the garage.
3. 1-V-89 on Rosetree Lane - The original request was for a 5.75 foot setback from the
lot line for a room addition, normally 10 foot would have been required. Ordinance
No. 4034 granted the 'variation.
4. 59-V-86, 701 CanDota - A variation allowed a 6 foot side yard instead of 10 foot for
a garage addition. Ordinance #3720
5. * 5-V-86, 219 South Elmhurst - A variation allowed a 3 foot side yard on a 50 foot lot
instead of 5 feet for a new house. Ordinance #3630
6. 59-V-85, 1507 Park - A variation allowed a 5'8" setback instead of 7 1/2 feet for an
addition. Resolution No. Z-59-85
7. 55-V-85, 121 N. Fairview - A variation allowed a 17 1/2 foot side yard instead of 20
feet for a new home. Ordinance #3575
8. * 45-V-85, 903 S. WeGo - A 3 foot side yard was approved instead of 6 1/2 feet in
order to build a room addition. Ordinance #3569
9. 56-V-84, 1825 Magnolia - A 4'8" side yard instead of 5 feet was allowed for a room
addition. Ordinance #3503
PB:hg
* Variations similar in nature to 4 North Pine Street
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 9-V-90
Hearing Date: January 25, 1990
PETITIONER:
Joseph and Jane Reibel
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
4 North Pine Street
PUBLICATION DATE:
January 10, 1990
REQUEST:
Variations from: Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow
a 3,5 foot side yard for an 11 foot long wall
section instead of 5 foot normally required; and
Section 14.1102.A to allow a front yard of 23
feet for a porch and 28 feet to the front
building wall, instead of the required 30 feet.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
Eileen Ward, 2 N. Pine St.
Steve Ward, 2 N. Pine St.
Larry Kucera, 6 N. Pine St.
r,Mairman Basnik introducedthis case as• j W,
J,•
r=MMO-F a porcri ana 26 teet to the fron building wall, instead ot the required 30 feet.
Mr. R;eibel, petitioner, was sworn in and te t'
Chairman Basnik questioned Mr. Reibel as to whether he received a "Stop Work# order
from the Village, to which he replied that he did not He further stated that to stop the
work at this point in time would have not only been costly to him, but also very
unreasonable on the part of the Village since fie did have a peffmt giving him the
permission to build his house.
ZBA-9-V-90
January 25, 1990
Page 2 of 3
Mr. Reibel gave a short background of this lot prior to his building his home. He explained
that for many years it has been vacant and served as a small "park" for the neighbor"s
children. He also said that his neighbor had a downspout running out onto a galvanized
sheet which was directed to this vacant lot thereby directing the flow of water onto the
vacant property. When the property was excavated by his contractor, the pipe was removed.
He went on to say that he can appreciate his neighbor's resentment ,.havinga two-story
structure built on land where their children played, and which absorbed much of the water,
however, be now wanted to 'utilize his land and build his home. He pointed out that he
was within Code as far as the height of the home was concerned, and only in violation of
an 11, foot mall projecting into the side yard by 18" which he interpreted as a 'bay"
projection allowed by Code. As far as the front yard setback was concerned, he felt that
his home was set back as much as the neighbor's in the block.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning and 'Zoning, represented the Village. He reiterated
the variation requests explaining that the permit was originally issued in error. He further
stated that, when the error was detected, measures were taken to schedule a .hearing to
authorize the side yard reductions. He further pointed out that the Village felt the request
was reasonable as the 11 foot wall for the bathroom is 12-1/2 feet from the house at 2
Forth mine, He indicated that the side yard setback for a 50 foot lot in an R-1 Single
Family District is 5 feet making the distance between homes in many places only 10 feet.
Whereas, in this case the distance between the homes is 12 1/2 feet He emphasized that
the variation is only for an 11 foot section of the wall and not the entire wall of the
structure. Mr. Clements then noted two similar cases in the past which were approved by
the .Zoning Board and. Village Board. He believed that this precedent was important in this
case. Staff" recommended approval of the variations.
As to the variation for front yard setback Mr. Clements pointed out that this home is not
any closer to the street than the other homes on Pine Street, and therefore, conforms with
the existing pattern of the block and the character of the neighborhood.
Chairman Basnik then. opened the hearing to the public for any comments and Eileen and
Steve Ward of 2 North Pine Street, spoke in opposition. Mrs. Ward gave an account of her
many unheeded calls and complaints to the Village to have this construction stopped.
Along with their frustration of the construction continuing, they listed the following
objections;
1. The lack of light;
2. Lack of adequate drainage
3. Lack of fresh air
4. Potential placement of utility 'units between buildings
5. Inner city appearance between the buildings making it look like a "gangway"
6. Extra, noise echoing between the two buildings;
7. Fire hazard having buildings too close together
8. ;Roof that is less than 3 feet from the list line.
ZBA-9-V-90
January 25, 1990
Page 3 of 3
Larry Kucera, 6 North Pine had an objection because it looked like a gangway in the inner
city. He also felt that the Village did not heed resident's concerns and allowed the
construction to continue.
The Zoning Board members then discussed the different aspects of the case. 1) A drainage
plan will need to be submitted to direct the flow around that side yard of the house; 2) The
24 foot height of the house seems to reduce open space, however, the height of the home
is within Code, and removing the 11 foot encroachment will not increase the amount of
light and air to the adjoining home; 3) The house meets the 45% impervious lot surface
coverage requirement of the Code.
After a lengthy discussion, the Zoning Board members felt that action should have been
taken by the Village to stop the work until a Zoning Board and Village Board hearing
could have determined the approval or denial of this request, regardless of any
repercussions. Mr. Lannon did not have a problem with the substance of the case, but
instead with the handling of the matter by the Village. The Zoning Board members felt
that action was needed by the entire Village Board to weigh the allegations and make a just
decision in this case, "They also noted that the Zoning Ordinance should be amended to
include a better description of "projection" to avoid future misunderstandings. Chairman
Basnik then read the variation standards.
Mrs. O'May, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant a variation from Section
14.1102.B.1 in Case ZBA-9-V-90 to allow a 3.5 foot side yard for an 11 foot long wall
section per petitioner's Exhibit No. 1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: None
NAYS: Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon, O'May, Petrucelli and
Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 0-7.
Mr. Lannon, seconded by Mrs. Brothers, moved to grant the petitioner's request for a
variation from Section 14.1102.A in Case ZBA-9-V-90 to allow a front yard of 23 feet for
a porch and 28 feet to the front building wall as per Exhibit No. 1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May,
Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT. ZBA-9-V-90, JOSEPH AND JANE REIBEL
LOCATION: 4 NORTH PINE STREET
DATE: JANUARY 18, 1990
The applicants are requesting variations from the following:
1. Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a side yard of 3.5 feet side yard instead of 5 feet for
wall projection 11 feet in length.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a front yard setback of 23 feet to the front porch and
28 feet to front building line. Code requires a 30 foot front yard.
VILLAGE STAFF _CDMMENTS
The Inspection Services Department notes that a building permit was issued for this home
reflecting the requested setback variations with only a minor difference. The front building
line extends an extra 6" further into the front yard than what the original building plan
indicated. The Engineering Department notes that a grading plan will have to be reviewed
to ensure that the side yard drains properly. The Village Manager gave authorization to
Mr. Reibel in order to continue construction on the house prior to the outcome of this
request. No other comments or objections were received regarding this case.
This home is presently under construction. This has been a vacant lot in an established
neighborhood. The lot is a narrow 50' wide by 157' deep, typical of the other lots on Pine
Street. Building plans indicating the subject side yard and front yard projections were
reviewed and approved by the Village in November, 1989. The dimensions shown on the
original site plan were misinterpreted and the permit was issued in error. Unfortunately,
this error on our part was not discovered until an inspection of the foundation was made.
The applicants are requesting these two variations so they can complete their house without
having to revise plans or remove walls,
Gil Basnik - Page 2
January 18, 1990
The minimum separation between this new house at 4 North Pine and the existing home
at 2 North Pine is 12-1/2' to the wall projection and 14' for the remainder of the wall.
With two adjacent 50' wide lots, having 5' minimum side yards, the separation between two
dwelling units could be as little as 10 feet. Also to be noted, the front building line setback
of 2 North Pine is approximately 23 feet, similar to that proposed for the porch setback at
4 North Pine. Other existing homes north of 4 North Pine are set back approximately 28'
to 30', similar to the front building line of this house.
For your information, the Zoning Board reviewed and approved two side yard variation
cases in 1989 similar to this case. The expansion of an attached garage was approved at
128 South Waverly with a 3'-6" side yard instead of 6'-6", and also at 805 South WaPella
Avenue, with a variation allowing a 3-4" side yard setback instead of 7 1/2'. The difference
between these two cases and the subject case is that'4 North Pine has an 11 foot long wall
projection, riot a 20 foot long garage wall in the required yard.
In summary, the variations requested are minimal and should have no significant impact
on the neighborhood. As indicated in this text, the building separation between 2 and 4
North Pine and the front yard setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood.
The Reibel's hardship is that they proceeded to construct this residence on the basis that
plans were approved and would have to go through great expense to change the plans in
order to meet Code. The staff recommends approval of the request.
UM
00
41
1 49
7,16
MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
SAFETY COMMISSION
December 4, 1989
I CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety
Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M.
II ROLL CALL
Present upon Roll Call: Lee Beening, Chairman
Andy Mitchell, V -Chairman
John Metzenthin, Commissioner
Tom Daley, Police Dept.
Drew Johanson, Eng.
Del Ulreich, Fire Dept.
Absent: Art Coy, Commissioner
Also present, was 1 resident in the audience.
III APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Tom Daley, moved to
approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Safety
Commission held November 6, 1989.
Motion Passed Unanimously
IV NEW BUSINESS
A. A request from Mr. John Dunn, 11 N. Owen St., to
eliminate access to Isabella St. from Rand Rd. during the
rush hour was reviewed. Mr. Dunn stated non-residents
use Isabella St. to avoid the traffic signals at Rand and
Central Rds. Commissioner Mitchell stated, that he lives
in this area and since the closing of Gregory St.,
Isabella and Henry are the only two streets to access
the area west of Rand Road between Kensington and Central
Road. Tom Daley, seconded by Commissioner Metzenthin
moved to table this request so traffic counts can be
taken on Isabella and Owen Streets.
Motion Passed Unanimously
B. The Safety Commission reviewed the need for a
designated Fire Lane on Henry Street adjacent to Busse
School, 101 N. Owen St. Del Ulreich stated that based
on width of the streets, the location of the fire
hydrants and the existing parking restrictions the Fire
Dept. has adequate access and that a posted Fire Lane is
not needed.
Commission Member Concurred Unanimously
MINUTES OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING
DECEMBER 4, 1989
December 12, 1989
Page 2
C. A request from Mr. Richard Poteracki, 1030 Hunt Club
Drive for the installation of Stop Signs at the curve on
Hunt Club Drive was reviewed. Mr.Poteracki feels Stop
Signs will control speeding. This request was reviewed
in September, 1987. At that time, the Commission
informed Mr. Poteracki, they could not justify the
installation of Stop Signs at the curve because there are
no intersecting streets or conflicting movements. Since
the last review the circumstances have not changed and
Stop Signs are 'still not warranted.
Del Ulreich, seconded by Tom Daley moved to
recommend denial of the request for Stop Signs on
Hunt Club Drive at the curve.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
V ADJOURNMENT
Having no further business the Meeting was adjourned at
8:30 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Drew G. Johanson
DGJ/m
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER'
SUBJECT: ROGERS INDUSTRIAL PARK
LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELMHURST AND ALGONQUIN ROADS
DATE: JANUARY 31, 1990
The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the subject property, from B-3 to 1-1, Light
Industrial. They also are requesting a special use for a Planned Unit Development in order
to permit three office/warehouse buildings for light industrial use in a business park setting.
The total building square footage will be 114,038 square feet.
It has been almost one year since the Rogers Company first appeared before the Zoning
Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission. After receiving recommendation for approval
from the Zoning Board and Plan Commission of their respective requests, a review by the
Illinois Department of Transportation delayed the processing of this case to the Village
Board level. As a result of the long review process by I.D.O.T. the Rogers Company once
again appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on December 21, 1989 to present the
same proposal. The findings of both the Zoning Board of Appeals and Plan Commission
are itemized below.
Zoning Board _Qf_
The Rogers Company first appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 23,
1989 to request rezoning and a Special Use/Planned Unit Development for this industrial
park. The Company described their history and indicated that they have other industrial
and/or office parks located in the nearby suburbs. The subject parcel was shown on an
area map along with the adjacent land uses. All adjacent parcels are zoned B-3, B-4 or
1-1. This property is currently zoned B-3, which would allow for commercial uses including
fast-food restaurants. The property is vacant.
Representatives of the Rogers Company noted that the project is compatible with the
neighboring uses and meets all Zoning Ordinance requirements. Approximately 30
individual tenant spaces will be provided for light industrial, assembly and office. 'rbe users
in this park will primarily be high-tech operations, selected by the Rogers Company and will
comply with Village performance standards. A brief overview of the landscape plan was
presented by the landscape architect. Another representative of the Company, indicated
that 8 to 13 trucks are predicted to enter the project on a daily basis. It is estimated that
this project will generate between $148,000 and $171,000 in real estate taxes annually.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
January 31, 1990
The staff pointed out that an office development had been approved for this site in 1985,
but was never built. The Rogers project is somewhat similar in appearance, but because
of the warehouse area, requires an 1-1 zoning.
The staff indicated that this proposal is compatible with the surrounding land uses and is
complimentary to what the Alter Company is marketing across Algonquin Road. It was
noted that the Rogers Company has worked closely with the staff to arrive at this site plan
and landscape design.
The Board discussed the Planned Unit Development/Special Use standards in the Zoning
Code and it was determined that this project meets all those standards. The Board then
voted unanimously 4-0 to rezone the property from B-3 to 1-1 and also to grant a Special
Use/Planned Unit Development for 114,038 square feet of office and warehouse assembly
space as shown in petitioner's Exhibits 1 and 2. There were no objectors present at this
hearing to voice any concerns.
After this initial Zoning Board meeting, the Rogers Company approached the Illinois
Department of Transportation for approval of curb cuts on Algonquin Road. It took many
months working with I.D.O.T. to resolve a problem with the driveway on Algonquin Road
and as a result, the site plan had been slightly revised. Therefore, since so much time had
elapsed from the first meeting, this case was sent back to the Zoning Board for a re-
hearing. On December 21, 1989, the Rogers Company once again appeared before the
Zoning Board with virtually the same plan. The Rogers Company has satisfied I.D.O.T. by
providing a shared driveway arrangement off of Algonquin Road for both their neighbor
to their west, Keolyn Plastics, and the new Rogers Industrial Park. This required a minor
change in the landscape plan.
The Zoning Board of Appeals, without discussion, moved to approve the rezoning and a
Special Use/ PUD subject to additional landscaping on the site approved by staff, in an
attempt to increase landscaping along the perimeter of the site. The vote was unanimous
6-0 in favor of recommending approval, and no objectors were present at this hearing to
voice any concerns.
Plan Commissio
The Rogers Company appeared before the Plan Commission on Wednesday, March 1, 1989.
They requested both a Comprehensive Plan change and a plat of subdivision approval from
the Commission. It was noted by staff at this meeting, that the proposed office
industrial/office designation would be appropriate for these parcels. A similar designation
was recently approved for Lake Center Plaza just north of this property. The existing
general commercial/office designation, in staffs opinion, may not be the best land use
classification considering the trend of development in the area. Staff also had no objections
to the subdivision plat. The Plan Commission voted unanimously 6-0 to recommend
approval of both.
John Fulton Dixon - Page ""3
January 31, 1990
On January 17, 1990, the Rogers Company once again appeared before the Plan
Commission to request a Development Code modification in order to permit water
detention in truck dock areas to accumulate storm water in excess of 1 foot in depth. This
depth would be necessary in order to provide adequate detention for the 100 year flood
plain requirements. Staff had two concerns relating to soil saturation and freezing and
thawing effects of the building foundation and footings. At this hearing, the applicant
responded to those concerns noting that the soils and the freezing and thawing effects will
not have a negative impact on the buildings. The Plan Commission then voted unanimously
5-0 to recommend approval of this Development Code modification. There were no
neighbors or objectors present at this hearing to voice any concerns.
In summary, the Rogers Company is requesting the following:
1. Rezoning from B-3 to I-1, Light Industrial for the subject property
2. A Special Use/Planned Unit Development allowing 114,038 square feet of
office/warehouse space as shown in petitioner's revised site plan (subject to
increased landscaping on site to be approved by staff).
3. A change in the Comprehensive Plan in order to allow industrial and office
rather than general commercial/office.
4. Plat of Subdivision.
5. A Development Code modification regarding storm water detention in the
loading docks.
PB:hg
Approved:
ALGONQUIN ROAD
9
S"
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO: ZBA-81-Z-89 & 82 -SU -89 HEARING DATE: December 21, 1989
PETITIONER: Arthur J. Rogers
PUBLICATION DATE: December 5, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY: The southwest comer of Elmhurst and Algonquin
Road
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to rezone a subject
vacant property from B-3 to 1-1 and also a special
use for a planned unit development in order to
permit three office/warehouse buildings for light
industrial use.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gil Basnik
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Ron Cassidy
Peter Lannan
Marilyn O'May
ABSENT: Len Petrucelli
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: None
Kathy Rogers, of the Arthur Rogers Group, presented her case stating that they were
asking for approval once again from the Zoning Board of Appeals for an office/warehouse
park on this site. Since Zoning Board approval of virtually this same plan on February 23,
1989, the Rogers Group has been working with I.D.O.T. to resolve a problem with the
driveway on Algonquin Road. It has taken many months to resolve this issue and, as a
result, the site plan has been revised slightly. The Rogers Group has satisfied the Illinois
Department of Transportation by providing a shared drive arrangement off of Algonquin
Road for both Keolyn Plastics and the Rogers Industrial Park. Mr. William Schmitz, of
the Rogers Group, identified the area along the west property line where they have deleted
a 10' landscape buffer from the original plans. This was necessitated because of the shared
driveway arrangement. The Rogers Group has tried to compensate for this loss of green
space by adding landscape areas to the west of their building and to the east of the Keolyn
Plastics building.
Mr. Martin Patterson, of the Rogers Group, explained that the users in this park will be
small type warehouse and office/warehouse mix. The building arrangement is absolutely
the same as it was at the original approval. The brick color has been slightly revised from
the original intent.
ZBA 81-Z-89, 82 -SU -89
Page Two
Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that the Village is in support of the shared
drive arrangement and understands that the 10' landscape buffer along the west property
line had to be eliminated. In the Village's opinion, more landscaping is required along the
perimeters of this site. Lake Center Plaza, across Algonquin Road, has already planted a
heavy landscape buffer which should be the standard for the Rogers Group. The Village
staff recommends that any approval of this rezoning and PUD be conditioned upon the
Rogers Group increasing the landscaping on the perimeter to meet staff's approval.
The Zoning Board of Appeals, without discussion, moved to approve the rezoning a special
use PUD subject to additional landscaping approved by staff. The vote was unanimous 6-
0 in favor of recommending approval.
Village Board action will be required on these requests. The case will be heard January
2, 1990.
Paul Bednar
Planner
IV=
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD F APPEALS HAIRMAN
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-81-7-89, ZBA-82-SU-89, ARTHUR J. ROGERS & COMPANY
LOCATION:
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELMHURST AND ALGONQUIN ROADS
DATE:
DECEMBER 13, 1989
The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject vacant property from B-3 to I-1 and a
special use for a Planned Unit Development in order to permit three office/warehouse
buildings for light industrial use.
BACKGROUND:
This request, in virtually the same form, was heard by the Zoning Board on February 23,
1989. After receiving the Zoning Board's recommendation for approval, the Rogers Group
needed I.D.O.T. approval for an access easement on Algonquin Road. The approval from
I.D.O.T. has taken many months to resolve and has resulted in a slightly revised site plan
along the west property line. The Rogers Group has satisfied the Illinois Department of
Transportation by providing a driveway easement onto Algonquin Road. Keolyn Plastics
and the Rogers Industrial Park will have a shared drive arrangement off of Algonquin
Road. Because of this long delay and the small change, the Zoning Board of Appeals must
act upon the proposal before it is sent to the Village Board.
Attached for your review are copies of the February 23, 1989 Zoning Board hearing minutes
along with the Village staff memo regarding this case. The comments included in this
memo along with the support of the proposal still pertains today.
By creating a shared driveway aisle, a 10' landscape buffer has been deleted along the west
property line. The Rogers Group has tried to compensate for this loss of green space by
adding landscape areas to the west of their building to the east of the Keolyn Plastic
building. In our opinion, this helps but more is needed. The median at the entrance
should be landscaped attractively. Also, the perimeter of this park should have an increase
in landscaping similar to that of Lake Center Plaza across Algonquin Road. We
;;;;;;onnmend that any approval be conditioned upon the Rogers Group, increasing the
landscaping to meet staff's approval.
go
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 10-Z-89, 11 -SU -89
Hearing Date: February 23, 1989
PETITIONER:
Arthur J. Rogers
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 7, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Southwest Corner of Elmhurst
and Algonquin Roads
REQUEST:
Rezone the subject property from B-3
to I-1 Light Industrial. A Special
Use Planned Unit Development is also
requested to allow 114,038 square
feet of office/warehouse space in a
business park setting.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT:
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Len Petrucelli
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
None
Stephen H. Malato, Attorney for the developer, stated that the request
is to rezone the subject property from B-3 to 1-1 Light Industrial and
to approve a Special Use/Planned Unit Development. Those associated
with the firm who will be speaking in favor of this development were
introduced by Mr. Malato.
Mr. William Schmitz, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer for Arthur J. Rogers and Company, presented a slide show to
give a brief overview of the company's history. The company was
established in 1946 and has been active in the full spectrum of
corporate real estate services, including, commercial, industiral, and
residential properties. The company has in-house design and
architecture, space planning, construction, property management,
general brokerage, sydication and development. Employees and
properties owned and managed were discussed.
The subject property was shown and surrounding zoning discussed. All
were in the B-3, B-4 and I-1 areas. The property is currently zoned
B-3, allowing for fast-food restaurants, etc. The developer feels
that the last thing this area needs is another fast food
-9t alclishment. The property is currently and has been vacant. The
project proposed is compatible with existing Village land use plans.
2811 10-Z-091 11 -SSU -.,a PAGE TWO
John Schriv, Architect ' indicated that the proposed building will be
compatibloi,14th neighborhood uses. Th# site consists of 7.447 acres
and the floor art& ratio will be 35%. All yard requirements will be
met and the proposed hei«
ht will be 18 feet. Thirty units will be
provided «r light industrial
tottedwill be high-tech, Roger*
Villageperformance standards. Loading dock space more than complies with the
Ordinance aid there ire no problems with drainage. The
nothingarchitect feels the�buildtnq will age veil and retain stylish, since
there is «.
Neil Carter representing The Brickman Group, Landscape Architect for
the developer, gave abrier`' history or the firm and explained the plan
for than proposed site. It was noted that some of the plant material
proposed and described might be hard to obtain due to last summer's
drought. Shade and ornamental trees will be used throughout, right of
ways will be sodded and edges of property would be seeded and
hydromulched and flowers will be used at all entrances.
Martin Kennelly, Corporate Real Estate Services, addressed the
marketing and traffic issue. The users will be a mix of sales,
service organizations, light assembly and possibly some light
warehousing. Eight to thirteen trucks coming and going on a daily
basis were predicted. It is estimated that this project will generate
between $148,000 and $171,000 in real estate taxes annually.
Mr. Basnik questioned what the timetable was for breaking ground on
this project. Mr. Schmitz` indicated that it was proposed for this
year.
Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, submitted a rendering to the
Board of a previously approved office complex from 1985. It consisted
of four one story office buildings encompassing approximately 91,000
square feet and parking space for 325 .cars. A It foot front yard
setback instead of 30 feet and a 10 foot rear yard setback instead of
the normal 20 feet were approved. Eight loading spaces rather than
nine required were also approved. Driveway cuts were reduced from two
to one along Algonquin and limited to one on Elmhurst. This project
was never built. The proposal from Arthur Rogers is similar in
design, look of office park type, , the 'height, and the size. The
difference is that a mix of assembly -warehouse and office is now
requested. Less vehicle traffic will occur into this development,
however, there will be an increase in truck traffic.°
The I-1 rezoning is requested to accommodate the assembly -warehouse
use and a Special Use -Planned Unit Development will tie down any
approval to this specific site plan.
Staff has worked closely with the Rogers Group during the past seven
months. The concern was for the Elmhurst Road frontage. After
refining the initial plans, the design of the buildings and use of
landscaping now hides the truck court;, minimizing theimpact that `
-ndluls,triai users will have on the: Elmhurst corridor
ZBA 10-A-89, 11 -SU -89 PAGE THREE
Mr. Bednar stated that the proposal was compatible with the
surrounding land uses and is complimentary to vhat the Alter Group has
proposed across the street. With inclusion of Village staff comments
included in the memo of February 16, staff endorses this project.
Considerable discussion ensued on the proposal meeting the standards
set by the Village. Both the PUD Standards and the Special Use
Standards were reviewed by the Zoning Board. It was determined that
this project meets all standards.
Mr. Basnik suggested that the fees for commercial level applicants be
reviewed to more accurately reflect staff time involved in such cases.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that he did not
believe that the fees should be set in such a way. The filing fee
should cover public notices and some of the staff time incurred in
preparation for Zoning Board meetings. As professionals, a service to
the community is provided as the "guardians of good development."
Mr. Basnik suggested that possibly a bond could be set, if the project
is built, the bond is returned. Otherwise, the Village is compensated
for its wasted time and effort.
Mr. Bednar stated that the Arthur Rogers proposal is going before the
Plan Commission next week for a Plat of Re -Subdivision approval and is
also going for a Comprehensive Plan change since the area is currently
slated for general commercial office use.
Mr. Cassidy questioned whether the developer was in agreement with all
staff comments. The comments were reviewed and Mr. Malato stated that
they were in agreement with the various comments, subject to Plan
Commission requirements, and would voM with various departments to
comply.
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant the rezoning
of the subject property from B-3 to I-1 Light Industrial.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
Mayes: None
By a vote of 4-0, the motion passed.
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant a Special Use
Planned Unit Development to allow 114,038 square feet of office and
warehouse/assembly space in a business park setting as shown in
Petitioner's Exhibit 1 and 2.
N
ZBA 10-Z-891 11 -SU -o_
PAGE FOUR
Upon roil call: Ayes: Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
Mayes: None
By a vote or 4-0, the notion passed.
Village Hoard action will be required on this case.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GIL BASNIX, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-10-Z-89, ZBA-11-SU-89, ARTHUR J. ROGERS
LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELMHURST AND ALGONQUIN ROADS
DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1989
REQUEST
The Rogers Company is requesting to rezone the subject property
from B-3 to I-1 Light Industrial. A Special Use/Planned Unit
Development is also requested to allow 114,038 square feet of
office/warehouse space in a business park setting.
VILLAGESTAFF.,CC7MENT s
Comments received from the staff relate to the construction of the
project and the layout of the site plan. The items are as follows:
1. Any work on Elmhurst or Algonquin Roads will require IDOT
approval. It is expected that IDOT may have concerns on the
location of the Algonquin Road driveway. They may require it
be shifted further west as a shared driveway with a
neighboring property in order to line up with the existing
median cut and the Wall Street driveway across Algonquin Road.
IDOT may also require traffic signals to be installed on
either Algonquin or Elmhurst which will be the responsibility
of the developer.
2. The developer will be responsible for all the maintenance of
the interior driveways.
3. The nearest sanitary sewers are located on the north side of
Algonquin at the west end of this property, and also on the
east side of Nordic Drive, approximately 400 feet west of this
property.
4. An IDOT permit will be required to connect sewers to the storm
sewers on Algonquin and Elmhurst Roads.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
February 16, 1989
ZBA-10-Z-89, ZBA-11-SU-89
S. A grading plan must be submitted as part of the engineering
documents. Detention will be required per the Development
Code. Drainage from areas to the west and north must not be
impeded.
6. The 12 inch watermain at the southeast corner of the property
and the 16 inch watermain on the north side of Algonquin Road
at the west corner of this subject' property, will have to be
looped around the property, according to Code.
7. The developer should make himself aware of all Development and
Building Code requirements. All public improvements on both
Elmhurst and Algonquin Roads, will be required, such as,
street lights, sidewalks, parkway trees, etc. It is possible
that a covenant be recorded that will ensure street lighting
be installed when the entire roadway is completed.
Alternatively, funds could be put into escrow to ensure the
installation of the lights.
I FLOMM
As the Board members may recall, this subject property was rezoned
from B-1 to B-3 late in 1985. The Northwest Partners Group had
proposed four 1 -story office buildings to be constructed on this
site. Approximately, 91,000 square feet of office space was
approved as part of a site plan; 325 parking spaces for cars were
provided. Variations were also approved for a 10 foot front yard
setback instead of 30 feet normally required; and a 10 foot rear
yard setback instead of the normally required 20 feet. A variation
also allowed 8 loading spaces rather than 9 required for the
buildings. Driveway cuts were reduced from the two proposed to one
along Algonquin and limited to one on Elmhurst.
PI&NNING ANN 7ONTMa CC MMrMMQ
This proposal is very similar in scope to the previously approved
office park by Northwest Partners. The size, height and design of
the buildings are almost identical. The main difference is that
the previously approved plan was limited to offices whereas, the
Rogers Group is proposing a mix of office and warehouse/assembly.
The fact that the Rogers Group proposes a mix of office and
varehorme, -reduces the parking space requirement an the site.
Whereas the previously approved office park required 325 parking
spaces, this proposal by the Rogers Group will provide 207 parking
spaces. Less vehicle traffic into this development will occur;
less autos but more trucks.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
February '16, 1989
ZBA-10-Z-89, ZBA-II-SU-89
These uses require an I-1 Light Industrial zoning. A Special Use -
Planned Unit Development, as requested, will tie down any approval
to this specific site plan.
The subject property is currently vacant. It is surrounded to the
south by retail, to the west by industrial, to the north by both
commercial and light industrial uses, and to the east by
commercial. This proposed office/light industrial development will
compliment the expected future development of the Lake Center Plaza
property across Algonquin Road to the north.
Staff has worked closely with the Rogers Group during the past
seven months on this proposal. our concern, after reviewing the
initial plans, was that the Elmhurst Road frontage should be as an
office or possibly retail type use, designating the back of the
property for the I-1 uses. After refining the initial plans by
Rogers Group, we are more comfortable that the Elmhurst Road
frontage is properly treated. It is very similar to the office
park previously approved. The design of the buildings and the
layout of the truck court, hidden from view by placement of
buildings and use of landscaping, will minimize the impact that
industrial users will have upon the Elmhurst corridor. We
anticipate the building space along Elmhurst Road will be sought
primarily by office users rather than the warehouse users just
because of the placement, design, and rental rate of the space.
We concur with all comments as presented by the various staff
departments and encourage the Rogers Group to review them further.
In summary, this proposal is compatible with the surrounding land
uses and will be an asset to this general area. Subject to the
Village staff comments, we endorse this project.
PB:hg
COUNTY OF COOK
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
GEORGE W.OUNNE.Ismsidont COUNTY BUILDING
Board of County Commissioner, MARCO DOMICO, Chairman
118 NORTH CLARK STREET C*mmitt*s On Road* *no Bridge.
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602
OFFICE of the SUPERINTENDENT
August 30, 1989
Honorable Carolyn H. Krause, Mayor
Village of 14xmt prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Re Schoenbeck Road
Rand Road -Camp McDonald Road
Section 89-W1643-03-Pv
Improvement, Transfer of
Maintenance and Jurisdiction
to Village
Agreement
Dear Mayor Krause:
Enclosed' for execution by the Village, are three copies of the captioned
agrewmt. The obligations of the parties are set forth on the second sheet,
Addendum #1. The Village is to accept maintenance and jurisdiction upon
bapproval of the Illinois Department Of Transportation ( to be formally indicated
y signature in the lower right hand part of the first page) of the agreement
as the instnoent of transfer. Thereafter, the Village is to designand construct
an improveTent' the CmIstructlOn costs, of Inhich are to be reimbu�s
y the County. ed the Village
b
ID0T is being, sent a copy of this instrument for form and content approval prior
to formal Processing by the Village and County. ID10T is requested to Promptly
indicate preliminary approval in writing or by phone to this Department's
Agreements Division (443-7761) so that we may inform the Village to proceed.
Very P�,/ yo,
chael J. tiffin*
Chief Engineer
Right of Way Bureau
Por Glenn W. Frederichs
Superintendent of Highways
Ccx)k- County
Copy: j&r.L--.,s C. Slifer, District Engineer
X -t:11 Cmar Nashif -`Schaumburg
M 111-I. Z;
Local Agency No. 1 (Conveyor)
Municipality xx
OCAL AGENCY Township!
AGREEMENT Road District xx
FOR
JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER County
Local Agency No. 2 (Recipient)
Municipality MOUNT PROSPECT
Township/
Road Ois(rlCt **
County e*
In accordance with authority granted In Section 4-409 of the Illinois Highway Code, this ageement is made and entered into be-
tween the above Local nCy No. 1, hereinafter referred to as 'CONVEYOR', and the above Local Agency No. 2, hereinafter
referred to as 'RECIPIENAT , to lranafer the Jurisdiction of the designated location Irom In CONVEYOR to the RECIPIENT.
Location Doscrlptlon
Name SCHOENBECK ROAD
Route W16 length -_� Mlles
Termini CAMP MCDONALD ROAD TO RAND ROAD
(located along the boundarY of Sections 27 and 28, T42N R11E of the 3rd PM
This transfer does/does not Include Structure No. InLAMl i cab 1 e)
Include for Mlunfotpalttles Only
WHEREAS, the authority to make Chan
Illinois Highway Code, gee to the Municipal Street System Is granted to the Municipality by Section 7E101 of the
NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED that the corporate authority of said municipality will pass an ordinance providing for the transfer
of the above location and shall attach hereto and make a part hereof a copy of the ordinance, and
for
ly
WHEREAS, the authority to make changes to the County Highway Counties
Ia granted to the County by Section 5-105 of the Illinois
Highway Code.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED that the County Board of said County will pass a resolution providing for the transfer of the
above location and shall attach hereto and make a part hereof a copy of the resolution,, and
de for
WHERE -AS, the authority to make chap two the Tovmship d Dist District tte s granted to the Highway Commissioner under
Section 6-201.3 of the Illinois Highway Code,
THE CONVEYOR AGREES to prepare a map of the above location and attach a Copy of such location map hereto.
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED, that thia Jurisdictional transfer will become effectiveu np__n tkEg f a nnrhti
jurisdictional transfer instrument (this aa l of � _
agreement with addenda)by the Illinois Department
of Iran
Additional Information and/or stlpulatkan�a. If any, are herebyattached and Identified below as being a part of this agreement.
Supplement Addendum #1 Stipulations, #2 Map, #3 Village Ordinance, 44 County Resolution
"I"w" supplement numbers or letters and page numb". If
IT IS FURTHER AGREED t the Provislona of this agreement shall be binding uponand Inure to the benefit of the parties hereto,
their successors and assigns,
APPROVED BY CONVEYOR THE COUNTY OF COOK APPROVED BY RECIPIENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Name
Name
Title , .. -
Chairman County S" d/Mayor/VII age Presfdent/etc. S Title f'ip e
Chairman County BoardJMayor/Vllla Prnsl.���'y""""
- dentletc,v
Signature
Signature
APPROVED
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OFILLINTRAN ORTATION
By:
BLR 1602 (1 Jae) Director of Highways -Oates
Of this Agreement
ADDENDUM #1 TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF COOK AND THE VILLAGE OF
MUUNT-7RMPECT CONCERNING TRANSFER OF—JURTSMUTOKWINTENANCE AND AN
ROAD
T"l?UVEMEM—Tl)r SCHOENBECK 86TWEEN RAND ROAD AND CAMP MCDONALD ROAD
STIPULATIONS
Y'Recipient Village of Mount, Prospect will
a, Upon ootice to do so from the Cnmty following approval. of this
agreement by the State -, assume maintenance of S&Cenbeck d be
Rand and Camp McDonald pceds; Pba tween
u. Upon approval. by the State of this agreevent as the instnwent of
jurisdictional transfer( the approving signattu.^e of the Director of
H'ghumys appearing 011 the 10wr right hand oorner of the first sheet
of this agreenent, the, date of signature being the date of approval
and the date on whidi this agreement becmes effective), assum
jurisdiction of Schoenbeck Road betwo—en Rand and Camp MicDonald Roads;
o' Prepare,.at Villagecontract plans, special provisions
confidential engineer's estimatel
��te of cost for an improvement to he`
indicated length mfSchoenbeck Road, to result in 40 feet between
back to back of curbs, pavement with curb and gutter, underground '
drainage system, t-
all within existing right of way, "rminating
on the north approximately 0.20 mile south of Camp terminating
Road;
d- Submit contract plans to the County for approval insofar as the
County's financial contribution is concerned (Article 2, following);
e, upon receipt of County approval, advertise, let and award x construcd
contract and supervise construction; on
f. Afford the County the opportunity to establish that the quantitiesthe
cmunty.isto pay for are not being unnecessarily exceeded without the
County " approval, hy observation and by Participation in final �inspection,
g. Submit bid results to the County, requesting County concurrence i
the contract awarded amount. »
2.Tbe Cormeyor County shall:
a. Promptly review all Village submittals;
b. Pay project construction oosts in two installinents: one half of the
awar� cOntract WOUnt Shall.,be due and payable the Village upon
the COUnty's receiving a Village statement for
aWaXd by the Village, and the rema, , Sam f0110WIM contract
inun. amount (reflecting any contract
adjustments approved by the County) shall be due and payable following,
Inspection of the completed project by the Village and County;
c. Pass a 0--Amty Board Resolution, concurrently with County execution of
this agreanent, stating intent to rarove the captioned 1"th of
Schoe*e&* Road frcrn CdUnty jurisdiction and from County mainteiancet
responsibility upcn approval of this agreement by the State.
LK GROVE TWP., PAGES 18-19
WHF-RANG
jurisdictional Transfer: Route W16, 0.41 mile ii-
SCHOENBECK ROAD
From Cook County
To Village of Mount Prospect
.T
ELK GROVE TWP., PAGE 19 -�-T- MAINE TWP., PAGE
t", 'X
917
Addendum #2
I OWNSHI
VILLAGE OF MXM PXSPB=
Village Ordinance No.
Providing for' the transfer of jurisdiction OF-Sc-fZjZgc* RDad beb.
Jeen P
and CamP McConald Road to the Village of Mount prospect and R)ad
WeMAS, the Village of mOunt Prospect andion n* CountY Of Cook are entering Into
agreement for the transfer of jurisdict•
from the 00unty to the Village•
of
Schoenheck lbad QW4 R --,ad to CwP i�!ODOnald lbad) and the transfer of
responsibilities
therefor along with the County to pay fr•maintenance
imPrOvetlent to said road o
(construction costs, only); the Cost of a Village
Now Therefore be it ordained that upon approval of the
Department of Transportaticn agreement by the Illinois
jurisdiction Of Sd-;-)en� R,,ado "*"ich this Ordinance
the Village, of Maunt prospect an (Q-wV McDonald Road to Pand Road) shall pass t
d o it shall
tl,e County thereafter to have no•
responsb -ereuPm beOQme a
dities of any kind
o tVillage stre t,
,e
thexeover, the
-0 pass the Village — Provided in the agreement.
maintenance t il
The Village Clerk is directed to attach a certified copy of this Ordinance'when
adopted as Addend=43 tO said agreement •if Processed as a s%�amte domnent
to lacm-wo that in the agreeaTent, and to re or
t of •
lagays fo
Of the agreement to the County Superntenentulm to Higttle CountY all t1iree copies
Board Of CbrWissioners of Cook County dr action by the
jurisdiction and to bind the aty toe3ridencing that Board's intent to transfer
the obligations of the agreenrant.
Certification
I, Village clerk In and for the Villag
a nrLinipal OOrporation of ti- e of Mount Prosvect,
.e State of Illinois and keeper of
POefrfseacidt aVnidllOacgWe, leItepro*vided bnrdinanec, epo hseerdebby certiVf., t --•.w.
oOrdd
a)PYoegfiles
to be a true,
Of MOUnt Prosect at its as the 11age Board of the Village
(regular, special) meetiN held cn
In testimpy whereof
1 f1mm mremtO set W haz4 wo affixed tlie seal of the said
Village of Mount Prospect at my office on the date abOve.
SEAL OF THE VILLAGE -VMZ—q�eeri:��
Addendum #3
CrATIFIGATZ Al Rrfrrk or art S AND FILLS—P.0 Sten Sjo*
STATE OF ILLINOIS, !
COUNTY OF COOK 1
I, Stamey T. Kuaper, :r., County Clerk of Cook County,
in thr State aforesaid and keeper of the reeuros and hlcs of said Cook County, do hereby
certify that, -The Hoard o4' Commissioners of The County of Cook at
they" regular meeting held on the date indicated below,
Passed the following resolution:
R S 0 L V T I Q N
Sesolved by the Members of the Board of Commissioners of Cooly 0oUnty,
The County of C,Ook, that the County will pay the cost.- of nst y -ti on 11 %tpro em
to Schoenbeck Poad (Rand to C�> Mr -Donald ked), Section 8-W1�-03-PV, improvement
the Village of Mount Prospect in two installnmts as provided in the agreement
attadied hereto, to which this elution is Addendum #4, and will transfer
Jura sdi cti cxc of said highwaythe, Village' of Mount. Prospect upon approval of
this agreement by the State's TIlin0is Department of Transportation Cas evidenced
by signature on Page l of said agreement) , and will notify said Village that the
Village is tis assume maintenance mer said hi
� tBreafter l,v' highway following such apr„n,�al, the
no responsibilities of any kind over said highway; and
the Department of Highways is directed to forward all three erpi of
to the State rerluestaxV formal, approval and to be governed in es this agreement
Of accordance with the
team hereof, ac
art of which appears from the records 'and files of my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set ray hand and
affixed the Seal of said County at my office in the City of
Chicago in said County, thi
day of D. I9
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING THE JURISDICTION TRANSFER
OF SCHOENBECK ROAD BETWEEN RAND AND CAMP MC DONALD ROADS
TO, THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that it would be in the best
interest of the Village to accept jurisdiction of that portion
Schoenbeck Road, generally located between Rand and Camp Mc Donald
Roads; and
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the jurisdictional transfer of that
portion of Schoenbeck Road specified in the attached, the Village
of Mount Prospect and the County of Cook shall enter into an
Agreement, a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", ; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with said Agreement, the Cook County
Department of Highways does hereby agree to pay the construction
costs involved with the improvement of that portion of Schoenbeck
Road being the subject of this jurisdictional, transfer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village President of the Village of Mount
Prospect is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk to attest his
signature on the Agreement between the Cook County Highway of
Highways, which Agreement transfers the jurisdiction of that
portion of Schoenbeck Road located between Rand Road and Camp Mc
Donald Road, more specifically designated in the Agreement attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
�SECTION TWQ: That following approval of said Agreement by the
Illinois Department of Transportation, the Village of Mount
Prospect will make certain improvements to Schoenbeck Road, the
construction costs involved with said improvement shall be paid to
the Village by the Cook County Department of Highways.
SECTION -NILEEE* That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to
forward a certified copy of this Ordinance, along with the
Agreement, to the Cook County Department of Highways for action by
the Board of Commissioners of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the
manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Directoriz�
DATE: February 2, 1990
SUBJECT: Medical Insurance Bank Account
One of the procedures that changed when the Village changed medical
insurance administrators is that benefit checks are now being
processed through a Village controlled bank account. Previously,
the checking account was controlled by the claims administrator.
Under the new procedures, the checks will be prepared and signed
by Brookfield (the claims administrator) but will then clear
through a Village bank account. One of the benefits of this
arrangement is that we will get any advantage from the "float,"
(the time between the date the check is written and the date it
clears the bank) . As a result we need to open a separate checking
account for the medical benefit checks.
Under our current banking arrangements, we maintain a money-market
account with each checking account in order to achieve zero -balance
checking accounts. Accordingly, there are two resolutions that
need to be authorized, one for the money market account and one for
the checking account. The Mayor and Treasurer will be the only
signatories on the money-market account, but there are five names
of Brookfield officials who will also be signatories on the
checking account. The reason there are five names is because
Brookfield uses a check -signing machine with two signatures for all
checks, but a manual signature is also required for any check over
$20,000. Any one of three officers of Brookfield can be a manual
signer.
Attached are two resolutions to authorize these accounts at the
First National Bank of Mount Prospect.
L2M
M
„._ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CORPORATION
Medical Benefit Plan Account 4905-8128
I, the undersigned, Do Hereby Certify, that the following is a complete, true and correct copy of certain
resolutions of the Board of Directors of Village of Mount Prospect
(Name of eorporatbn In lull)
a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois
(Name of Stab whom otsuni”
which resolutions were duly adopted at a duly called meeting of the said Board, held o February 6,
(Da'
of meeting)
190_, a quorum being present, and are'set forth in the minutes of the said meeting; thatal am the keeper
of the corporate seal and of the minutes and records of this Corporation; and that the said resolutions have
not been rescinded or modified:
Be It Resolved, that the Fi rpt Na d0k 0 ofMount Prospect.,......
be and hereby is designated a depositary in which the funds of this Corporation may be de-
posited by its officers, agents, and employes, and that the. Village President and
Villaqe Treasurer
shall be and each of them hereby is authorized to endorse for deposit or negotiation any and
all checks, drafts, notes, bills of exchange, and orders for the payment of money, either be-
longing to or coming into possession of this Corporation. Endorsements for deposit may be
by the written or stamped endorsement of the company without designation of the person
making the endorsement.
Be It Further Resolved, that the
v
nor the
o1 ow* named
and/or Daher parwna author , to den cheeks; join a, e.: Proaldmt, Treasurer, et-: also Please indicate to what man•
oe.r lite aMtwe naobd omrexa aro to Wa�a—dturlr, t�tar two, or lolntlr, etc.)
of this Corporation are (is) authorized to SIGN ANY AND ALL CHECKS, DRAFTS,
AND ORDERS, including orders or directions in informal or letter form, against any funds
at any time standing to the credit of this Corporation with the said Bank, and/or against
any account of this Corporation with the said Bank, and that the said Bank hereby is
authorized to honor any and all checks, drafts and orders so signed, including those drawn to
the individual order of any such officer and/or other person signing the same, without fur-
ther inquiry or regard to the authority of said officer(s) and/or other person(s) or the use
of said checks, drafts and orders, or the proceeds thereof.
Be It Further Resolved, that the
Not Applicable
o.
(Please indicate 1n what manner the *be" named omoen an b a4�a—dney, any two, or jointly. etc.)
of this Corporation (are) (is) authorized to borrow from time to time on behalf of this Cor-
poration from the said Bank such sums of money for such times and upon such terms as may
to them, or any of them, seem advisable, and to execute in the name of the Corporation notes,
drafts, or agreements for the re -payment of any sums so borrowed, and they and each of
them are hereby authorized to discount with the said Bank any of the notes, bills receivable
or acceptances held by this Corporation upon such terms as they may deem advisable and
to pledge or hypothecate as security to said Bank any of the notes, bonds, stocks, bills receiv-
able, warehouse receipts and/or other documents, accounts, securities and/or property of the
Corporation, and to execute and deliver any and all endorsements or instruments of assign-
ment or transfer which may be necessary or proper in such cases effectually to transfer to
the said Bank the property so hypothecated or delivered;
Be It Further Resolved, that this corporation by its duly authorized agent, enter into an
agreement with the said First National Bank of Mount Prospect
contemporaneously with the opening of said account whereby said corporation agrees in con-
sideration of the opening of said account to assume and pay all expenses, costs and attorney's
fees incurred by said Bank in any legal proceedings brought against the said Bank by reason
of the said account and further agrees that any funds in possession of the said Bank to the
credit of this corporation may at any time be applied toward payment of such expenses.
Be It Further Resolved, that each of the foregoing resolutions shall continue in force un-
til express written notice of its rescision or modification has been received by the said Bank,
but if the authority contained in them should be revoked or terminated by operation of law
without such notice, it is resolved and hereby agreed for the purpose of inducing the said
Bank to act thereunder, that the said Bank shall be saved harmless from any loss suffered
or liability incurred by it in so acting after such revocation or termination without such
notice.
I Further Certify that the following named persons are the officers of the said Corporation, duly quali-
fied and now acting as such:
President Gerald L. Farley
Vice -President
Vice -President
Secretary Carol A. Fields
Treasurer David C. Jepson
Asst. Secretary.
Asst. Treasurer.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the said Corporation,
this 6th day of February „ A. D. 19-310L.
SEAL
IAWORTANT:
Imprint Seal of
Corporation Here.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CORPORATION
Medical Benefit Plan Account 019219'
I. the undersigned, Do Hereby Certify, that the following is a complete, true and correct copy of certain
resolutions of the Board of Directors of
(N600" of corporation In full)
a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of
(Name o; State where orrunized)
which resolutions were duly adopted at a duly called meeting of the said Board, held onFebruary6.
(D* of ting)
90
19 , a quorum being present, and are set forth in the minutes of the said meeting; that"meeting)
am the keeper
of the corporate seal and of the minutes and records of this Corporation; and that the said resolutions have
not been rescinded or modified:
Be It Resolved, that the First National Rank nf Mount eros ert
be and hereby is designated a depositary in which the funds of this Corporation may be de-
posited by its officers, agents, and employes, and that the Village Presidlant and
Village Treasurer
shall be and each of them hereby is authorized to endorse for deposit or negotiation any and
all checks, drafts, notes, bills of exchange, and orders for the payment of money, either be-
longing to or coming into possession of this Corporation. Endorsements for deposit may be
by the written or stamped endorsement of the company without designation of the person
making the endorsement.
Belt Further Resolved, thatlk"or the Vilfit Plan
Account (Account Numbergaly. any one of thg, following:
L. Farley.- Harvey N. Medyin
David C. Jepson Charles L. Lohenry
Patricia Regner
(Titlea of *Mctr# and/or other parsons authorized to sign checks: 9. W:
. President, Tre"urer, aw.; also Plesaa indicate in what man.
nor the SbOYM named ofilcere an to W two, or jointly, etc.)
of this Corporation (are) (is) authorized to SIGN ANY AND ALL CHECKS, DRAFTS,
AND ORDERS, including orders or directions in informal or letter form, against any funds
at any time standing to the credit of this Corporation with the said Bank, and/or against
any account of this Corporation with the said Bank, and that the said Bank hereby is
authorized to honor any and all checks, drafts and orders so signed, including those drawn to
the individual order of any such officer and/or other person signing the same, without fur-
ther inquiry or regard to the authority of said officer -(a) and/or other person (s) or the use
of said checks, drafts and orders, or the proceeds thereof.
Be It Further Resolved, that the
- - This Section Not Applicable
(Plealo indicate In what manner the above amood o2COM are UP ftn--GinglY, MY two. or Join
of this Corporation (are) (is) authorized to borrow from time to time on behalf of this Cor-
poration from the said Bank such sums of money for such times and upon such terms as may
to them, or any of them, seem advisable, and to execute in the name of the Corporation notes,
drafts, or agreements for the re -payment of any sums so borrowed, and they and each of
them are hereby authorized to discount with the said Bank any of the notes, bills receivable
or acceptances held by this Corporation upon such terms as they may deem advisable and
to pledge or hypothecate as security to said Bank any of the notes, bonds, stocks, bills receiv-
able, warehouse receipts and/or other documents, accounts, securities and/or property of the
Corporation, and to execute and deliver any and all endorsements or instruments of assign-
ment or transfer which may be necessary or proper in such cases effectually to transfer to
the said Bank the property so hypothecated or delivered;
Be It Further Resolved, that this corporation by its duly authorized agent, enter into an
agreement with the sa% First National Bank of Mount Pros ect
contemporaneously with the open1ng of said aCC011nt Wherebya%d Corporation agree8 in con-
sideration of the opening of said account to assume and pay all expenses, costs and attorney"s
fees incurred by said Bank in any legal proceedings brought against floe said Bank by reason
of the said account and further agrees that any funds in possession of the said Bank to the
credit of this corporation may at any time be applied toward payment of such expenses.
Be It Further Resolved, that each of the foregoing resolutions shall continue in force un-
til express written notice of its rescision or modification has been received by the said Bank,
but if the authority contained in them should be revoked or terminated by operation of law
wi.hout such notice, it is resolved and hereby agreed for the purpose of inducing the said
Bank to act thereunder, that the said Bank shall be saved harmless from any loss suffered
or liability incurred by it in so acting after such revocation or termination without such
notice.
1 Further Certify that the following named persons are the officers of the said Corporation, duly quali-
fied and now acting as such:
President Gerald L. Farley
Vice -President
Vice -President
Secretary Carol As Fields
Treasurer IDaYJd C. Jepsgnn
Asst. Secretary
Asst. Treasurer
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the said Corporation,
this 6th day of Fphruary , A. D. 1952.
SEAL Secretary.
INdPORTANT:
Imprint Seal of
Corporation Here.
Village of "fount Prospect
Mour r?rospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
RECEIVED FEB 2 1990
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Project Engineer
DATE: February 1, 1990
SUBJECT: 1990 MFT General Maintenance Program
Attached is a Resolution for Maintenance of Streets and
Highways By municipality Under the Illinois Highway Code in the
amount of $613,000.00. The Illinois Dept. of Transportation
requires that this Resolution before Motor Fuel Tax Funds may be
used. I recommend that the Mayor and Board of Trustees adopt this
Resolution on the February 6th Board Meeting.
Listed below are the MFT Accounts that will be affected by
this Resolution.
1.) 22-071-05-7401 Salt/Calc chloride P. 154 $40,000
2.) 22-071-14-6232 Traffic Light Maint. P. 167 $21,000
3.) 22-071-14-6238 Traffic Light Energy P. 167 $27,000
4.) 1990/91 MFT Resurfacing Program $525,
000
$613,000
Resolution for Maintenance of Streets and Highways
By Municipality Under the Illinois Highway Code
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor And Board of Trusteps of the
(Council or President and Board of Trustees)
Village —Of Mount Prospect Illinois, that there is hereby
(City, Town or village) (Name)
appropriated the sum of $ 613,000.00 of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purpose of maintaining
streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois Highway Code, from January 1, 199 -0 -
to December 31, 19 90
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that only those streets, highways, and operations as listed and described on the ap-
proved Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, including supplemental or revised estimates approved in connec-
tion with this resolution, are eligible for maintenance with Motor Fuel Tax funds during the period as specified above.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall, as soon as practicable after the close of the period as given
above, submit to the Department of Transportation, on forms furnished by said Department, a certified statement
showing expenditures from and balances remaining in the account(s) forthis period; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall immediately transmit two certified copies of this resolution
to the district office of the Department of Transportation, at Schaumburg Illinois.
...........
KKX
1, IKjXX Carel A Pi -I rl--- Clerk in and for the__Atj_j4eq�e_
M rs. (CITY, Town or Village)
of Mount Prospect , County of
hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by
the Mayor And Board of Trustees at a meeting onF_912r11&1rY__6_.._ 19 -9-0-.
(Council or President and Board of Trustee;)
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this — day of
A.D. 1990 .
(SEAL)
SLR 4123 (Rev. 6/87)
IL 494-0354
—WISIS9 Clerk
(City, Town or Village)
F32:2.1411 4 -1
19
6e�pa,tW;ntof —Transport—alio—n—_
District Engineer
"VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER
DATE: JANUARY 24, 1990
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS RECEIVED FOR THE SENIOR
CENTER ASBESTOS REMOVAL PROJECT
`I'he Village of Mount Prospect has requested proposals from consultants to review the
asbestos removal needs for the Mount Prospect Senior Center, prepare a bid document for
the removal or treatment of identified asbestos, and monitor and take air samples of the
selected contractor's work removing and treating the asbestos material. A notice to
consultants was published in the Mount Prospect Herald on December 21, 1989 identifying
the scope of the work and the proposal opening date of January 17, 1990. Five consultants
obtained proposal documents and submitted proposals for the January 17 proposal opening.
The following is a summary of those proposals:
Firm
1. ALEX
2. A.C.M., Inc.
3. Midwest Asbestos Consultants, Inc.
4. A.I.M., Inc.
5. Micro -Fibre Laboratories, Inc.
T+_ �, ,M
$3,675.00
$4,091.00
$6,930.00 to $7,930.00
$8,600.00
Insufficient data/bid
Staff has determined that the lowest and best proposal is from ALEX. The firm's quote
assumes a project manager/air sampling fee computed at $42.50 per hour for 8 hours, or
$340,00. If the selected contractor's work exceeds the 8 hours, ALEXs fee will exceed their
$3,675 proposed price by $42.50 per hour.
The company's references: School District #59 and Berwyn School District # 100 noted that
they feel ALEX is a good company, their work is thorough and they conduct their work in
a timely manner. One indicated ALEX protected them from contractors requesting extras
from original approved work. We would also note that the firm is I.D.O.T. approved and
has the appropriate insurance.
John Fulton Dixon, Page I
January 24, 1990
The company's references: School District #59 and Berwyn School District # 100 noted that
they feel ALEX is a good company, their work is thorough and they conduct their work in
a timely manner. One indicated ALEX protected them from contractors requesting extras
from original approved work. We would also note that the firm is I.D.O.T. approved and
has the appropriate insurance.
Staff would recommend that the proposal submitted from ALEX be approved and that the
Village enter into an agreement with this firm for said work. Payment on this contract will
come from Account No. 23-062-05-6466. This account currently has a balance of
$20,000.00.
MES:hg
Approved:
Mount Prospect Public Works —Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7W arV LU
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: January 31, 1990
SUBJ: Biodegradable Paper Compost Bag - Bid Results
On January 30, 1990 sealed bids were opened for the proposed
Purchase of biodegradable paper Compost bags for the Village's
yard material collection program beginning April 1, 1990. There
were eleven(11) invitational bids sent out plus legal notice in
the local paper announcing this bid. Bid results as follows:
COST LUMP SUM*
BIDDER PER BAG COST _ DISCOUNT W�T DELIaRy
Mid America Packaging $.255 $63,750.00 1% 30 days
Stone Container Corp. .2745 68,625.00 1% 21 days
OK Papers, Inc** .281 70,250.00 1% 21-28 days
Set Point Paper Co.Inc. .285 71,250.00 1% 28 days
International Paper .285 71,250.00 1% 45 days
US Packaging, Inc** .289 72,250.00 1% 30 days
Canover Industries, Inc. .3439 85,975.00 1% 30 days
* - Lump sum cost was based on a 20-25% participation rate or
250,000 bags. The bid specifications guarantees a purchase of
150,000 bags.
** - Both OK Paper and U.S. Packaging did not bid according to
specifications. Their bags are sewn bottom versus the flat
bottom called for.
I recommend acceptance of the lowest bid as submitted by Mid -
American Packaging of $.255 per bag and a guaranteed purchase of
150,000 bags.
Also attached to this memo is a copy of the proposed imprint for
the bags. This has been reviewed and approved by the Recycling
Commission who requests the village Board's concurrence.
1P
Glen R. Ander
I concur with this recommendation.
hertert L. Weeks
CC: Recycling Commission
Dave Jepson
Lisa Angell
Attached
GRA/eh
-10 NOT FILL ABOVE THIf' INE
FOR EASY CLOSING -ROLL DOWN TOP OF BAG AND CRIMP SECURELY.
MOUNT PROSPECT
YARD MATERIAL BAG
PER STATE LAW AND VILLAGE ORDINANCE: YARD MATERIALS
CAN= BE DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS.
IF YOU DO NOT LEAVE THE GRASS CLIPPINGS ON YOUR
LAWN AND/OR COMPOST, YOU MW USE THIS SAO ONLY
FOR CURBSIDE COLLECTION.
YABD MATEBIALS* GRASS CLIPPINGS, LEAVES, SMALL AMOUNTS OF
BRUSH & SOD, TWIGS, GARDEN MATERIALS AND WEEDS,
WHERE & WHEN: PLACE FILLED BAGS AT THE CURB ON THE SAME DAY
AS YOUR NORMAL GARBAGE AND RECYCLING PICKUP.
COLLECTION PERIOD: WEEKLY APRIL 1 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30.
BRUSH: MUST BE SECURELY BU 0.L IN NO LONGER THAN
5 FOOT LENGTHS AND MUST NOT EXCEED 24 INCHES
IN DIAMETER OR 45 POUNDS IN WEIGHT,
WHERE & WHEN: PLACE BUNDLES AT THE CURB ON THE SAME DAY AS YOUR
NORMAL GARBAGE AND RECYCLING PICKUP. PICKUP IS
ONLY ONCE - THE FIRST FULL WEEK OF EACH
MONTH,
COLLECTION PERIOD: APRIL 1 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30.
WARNING!
"DON'T BAG'EM, RECYCLE'EM!"
LEAVE YOUR GRASS CLIPPINGS ON YOUR LAWNI
COMPOST YOUR YARD MATERIALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL PUBLIC WORKS AT 870-5640
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1W INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= CrrV USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: February 1, 1990
SUBJ: Emergency Sewer Repair
As I indicated to you yesterday we have a section of combined
storm/sanitary sewer that collapsed opposite 404 S. Wapella
Avenue. It was initially discovered when a section of the road-
way, approximately 41 x 61 collapsed into a void underneath the
street at about a 6' depth.
As near as we can tell there was a street inlet adjacent to the
collapsed section that had failure, and over some period of time
the base of the street had been washing into the combined sew-
er. The street inlet connection to the main sewer is all broken
and an excessive amount of dirt is getting into the main line.
If this is not fixed immediately we stand a chance of full
street collapse plus blocking of the sewer for all the residents
in that area.
This is a 15" combined sewer at about a 12' depth and it could
be assumed that the excavation will have to be in excess of a
15' depth to make the repair. In addition we have televised the
sewer to determine the exact point of the main failure and
believe that approximately 401 to 501 of additional sewer may
have to be repaired at the same time as it is cracked and egg
shaped. This type of repair work needs to be a complete replace-
ment versus relining and needs immediate attention.
Due to the extreme depth and a probable lengthy trench it is
best that we hire a private contractor with larger machinery
than the Village owns. We were fortunate to have secured on
short notice the services of Rossetti Contracting and we project
a minimum of $10,000 to make the spot repair. If additional
pipe is in bad shape and needs immediate replacement this will
increase the cost. The work is scheduled to begin Friday morn-
ing at 7:00 a.m.
Wl)
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
Village 0,_Mcunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Herb Weeks, Public Works Director
Flifflo Chuck Bencic, Inspection Services Director
DATE: December 12, 1989
RE: 1989 RESURFACING PROJECT
Attached find a memo from Fred Tennyson concerning the 1989 MFT
Resurfacing Project. The project went 3.8% - $23,538.75 over contract
due mainly to additional grinding quantities and the addition of Verde
Court and a small section of Henry St. to the project. I recommend
we submit this additional P.O. to the Board for their approval.
Chuck -Bencic
CB: rm
Attach.
cc: Engineering
File
VIE I'age of ,Mount Prospeci
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Chuck Bencic
FROM: Fred Tennyson
DATE: December 8, 1989
SUBJECT: 1989 General Maintenance Resurfacing Program
Arrow Road Construction Company
Attached is the final pay request from Arrow Road Construction
Co. for the 1989 Resurfacing Program. Please note that the final
construction cost exceeds the awarded contract cost by $23,538.75
(3.8% of original contract). This increase can be attributed to
two specific additions to the contract.
1.) Several of the concrete base streets near the center of
town required more pavement grinding than was originally estimated.
I had calculated an average of 2.511 of pavement grinding for these
streets. Upon completing the actual work, Elmhurst Ave., Wille
St., Elm St., Evergreen Ave., and Pine St, required as much as 611
of surface removal. This extra work accounted for $16,500.00 of
the extra payment.
2.) During the course of construction the Public Works Dept.
and the Engineering Division agreed that Verde Ct. ' and Henry St.,
west of Kenilworth Ave., should be resurfaced. These streets are
very short and are connected to streets that were scheduled for
repair. These two streets accounted for about $9,000.00 of extra
work which was added to the contract.
Attached is a purchase order in the amount of $23,538.75.
This extra construction cost will be paid for from Account No. 1-
071-04-8495.
Fred
FT/m
NWCDS
Northwest Central'bispatch System
Date: January 17, 1990 1
To: NWCDS Board of Directors
a, -
From: Doug Edmonds.' Executive Director
Re: New Venture Agreement to Add Prospect Heights
Enclosed is a proposed resolution and a new venture
agreement to be presented to the Board of Trustees to allow
for the addition of Prospect Heights to the System. There
was general agreement among the Board of Directors that a
new agreement was appropriate. This would bring the
document up to date and also serve to incorporate a prior
amendment.
The 9-1-1 venture agreement will also need an addendum
signed by all current members, but this will be deferred
until we see the outcome of their 9-1-1 referendum in March.
It is our goal to have the NWCDS venture agreement acted
upon by each village at their first meeting in February.
Once it is adopted, I will circulate five copies for the
purpose of obtaining original signatures.
If you anticipate any questions which might be raised by the
Trustees concerning this matter, please let me know. I have
included a copy of our proposal to Prospect Heights which
they fully accepted by Resolution of the City Council.
Since they will be incorporated into the system with little
or no additional overhead, their participation has reduced
member assessments by $96,000 in the coming fiscal year.
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYSTEM VENTURE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into on the effective date
hereinafter set forth, by and between the local governments
signatory hereto (and also those which may hereafter become
signatory hereto):
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, a Central Dispatching System has existed in
Northwestern Cook County and in parts of Lake and DuPage
Counties since 1972; and
WHEREAS, such System has been demonstrated to be of great
value to its constituent municipalities, the signatories
hereto; and
WHEREAS, the addition of another municipality to the System
will provide for more efficient and economical dispatching
of lire and property saving services; and
WHEREAS, the cost of providing and maintaining a central
dispatching system is probably excessive for any one of such
signatories; and
WHEREAS, a centralized police, fire and other emergency
dispatching system can adequately serve the needs of all of
such signatories; and
WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Constitution of
the State of Illinois and the Intergovernmental C ---operation
Act, Chapter 127, Paragraphs 741 through 749 of the Illinois
Revised Statutes, authorize joint exercise by two or more
local governments of any power common to them; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the signatories hereto to
jointly provide for and maintain a central dispatching
system for their mutual advantage and concern.
11
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises,
the mutual advantages to be derived therefrom and in
consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it
is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Venture Establigbed. Pursuant to the joint powers
authorization of the Illinois Constitution and the
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, Chapter 127, Paragraphs
741 through 749 of the J-11iois Revised Statutes, the
undersigned do hereby federate together in a cooperative
- 3 -
0
venture for the joint and mutual operation of a centralized
communications system, to be known as "Northwest Central
Dispatch System" (hereinafter designated as NWCDS) which
shall consist of all of the local governments which may
hereafter become signatory hereto.
2. BY -Laws. NWCDS shall be subject to and shall be
governed by certain By -Laws, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "All and by this reference made a part of
this Agreement, together with any amendments which may be
made to said By -Laws in the manner and means therein set
forth.
n
3. ANHI.rr M.SE art ic ination. Each participating local
government of the Central Dispatching System (and each local
government which may hereafter sign after approval as
required by the By -Laws, provided such local governments are
eligible to participate pursuant to said By -Laws) is a
member of NWCDS and is entitled to the rights and privileges
and subject to the obligations of membership, all as
provided in said By -Laws.
4. Terminati-on. Any party to this agreement may cease to
be a party hereto and may withdraw from participation in
NWCDS in the manner and means set forth in said By -Laws.
- 4 -
5. Rowers of the gjystem. NWCDS shall have the power in its
own name to make and enter into contracts, to employ agents
and employees, to acquire, hold and dispose of property,
real and personal, and to incur debts, liabilities or
obligations necessary for the accomplishment of its
purposes, but no such contract, employment, purchase, debt,
liability or obligation shall be binding upon or obligate
any member except as authorized by the attached By -Laws.
NWCDS shall not have the power of eminent domain or the
power to levy taxes.
6. Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended, except
by written agreement and resolution of all the then parties
to it. However, the By -Laws attached hereto as Exhibit "All
may be amended from time to time by the method and means
provided herein, provided such amendments do not conflict
with the terms set forth in this Agreement exclusive of said
Exhibit "A".
7. =AtiM. This Agreement and NWCDS shall continue in
effect until rescinded by unanimous consent of the then
parties or until terminated in the manner provided in said
By -Laws. Upon such termination, the assets remaining shall
be disposed of in the manner set forth in said By -Laws.
- 5 -
8. Enforcement. Each member shall have the right to
enforce this Agreement against any other member. If suit is
necessary therefor, a defaulting member shall pay reasonable
attorney's fees to NWCDS as adjudicated by the Court.
9. Authorization. Prior to execution of this Agreement,
each member shall deliver to the other a certified copy of a
suitable ordinance or resolution authorizing and directing
the execution of this Agreement.
10- R1f9Qti—Ye--Q-a-t—e- This Agreement shall become effective
when signed by all of the respective representatives of the
Village of Arlington Heights, Village of Elk Grove Village,
Village of Mount Prospect, Village of Buffalo Grove, and
City of Prospect Heights.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned local governments have
set their signatures on the respective dates set forth
below. This document may be signed in duplicate originals.
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
By:
ATTEST:
Date:
- 6 -
VILLAGE OF ELK GROVE VILLAGE
By•
ATTEST:
Date:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
By:
ATTEST:
Date:
-
VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
By:_
ATTEST:
Date:
CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS
By:
ATTEST:
Date:
/CAF
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND
THE NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYSTEM TO
PROVIDE FOR MEMBERSHIP BY THE CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect previously authorized entry into an Agreement to provide
and maintain a Central Emergency Dispatch operation known as
Northwest Central Dispatch System, hereinafter referred to as
"NWCDS"; and
WHEREAS, NWCDS has proven successful in providing emergency
communication services to the Mount Prospect Police and Fire
Departments; and
WHEREAS, the City of Prospect Heights has made application for
membership in NWCDS; and
WHEREAS, the NWCDS Board of Directors has unanimously recommended
approval of the City of Prospect Heights membership request; and
WHEREAS, it is believed that the inclusion of an additional
community in the system will prove beneficial to both NWCDS and the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the addition of a new member to NWCDS requires approval
by the member communities by passage of an amended Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That, pursuant to Article VII, Section 10, of the
1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois and the
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, Chapter 127, Paragraphs 741
through 749 of the Illinois Revised Statutes, that the Mayor is
hereby authorized and directed to sign and Clerk to attest his
signature on the Amended Agreement for Northwest Central Dispatch
System to provide for the addition of the City of Prospect Heights
as a member to the Northwest Central Dispatch System, a copy of
which Amended Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of r 1990.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
I
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT MAINTENANCE
PROJECT: -Brentwood Subdivision
LOCATION: Wolf Road and Kensingtop Road
DATE: October 30, 1989
WATER MAIN 3901,39571,3435 FT. 611 811_L_12'1 SIZE
SANITARY SEWER -4029 FT. 819 SIZE
STORM SEWER See Below FT. SIZE
ROADWAYS 18,170 S.Y.
SIDEWALKS 52,625 _SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS Installed
STREET LIGHTS 16 EA. # 250 W. Merc.
PARKWAY TREES Yes # 252 EA.
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING 11,210 SY
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS - Private Maintenance
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVE - N/A
WATER MAIN FT.
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER FT.
ROADWAY
SIZE
—FT. SIZE
SIZE
PARKING LOTS SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF —1 19.
STORM SEWER; 1101-3611, 2881-3011, 3951-2711, 2301-24", 8771-2111,
5081-1811, 6661-1511, 2842'-12".
YES
NO
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED
ENGINEER
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED:
CLERK
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
CLERK
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: PIT-
ENGINEER
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE
PLANTING
APPROVAL
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
FIRE PREVENTION
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR A�CCEPTANCZ
BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN 3901,39571,3435 FT. 611 811_L_12'1 SIZE
SANITARY SEWER -4029 FT. 819 SIZE
STORM SEWER See Below FT. SIZE
ROADWAYS 18,170 S.Y.
SIDEWALKS 52,625 _SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS Installed
STREET LIGHTS 16 EA. # 250 W. Merc.
PARKWAY TREES Yes # 252 EA.
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING 11,210 SY
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS - Private Maintenance
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVE - N/A
WATER MAIN FT.
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER FT.
ROADWAY
SIZE
—FT. SIZE
SIZE
PARKING LOTS SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF —1 19.
STORM SEWER; 1101-3611, 2881-3011, 3951-2711, 2301-24", 8771-2111,
5081-1811, 6661-1511, 2842'-12".