HomeMy WebLinkAbout3298_001MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JANUARY 26, 1982
ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Krause at
7:32 p.m., in the Public Safety Building, 112 East
Northwest Highway. Present at the meeting were:
Trustees Ralph Arthur, Gerald Farley, Edward Miller,
Norma Murauskis and Ted Wattenberg. Absent from the
meeting because of a schedule conflict was Trustee w
Floros. Also in attendance were Village Manager
Terrance Burghard, Assistant Village Manager Edward
Geick, Director of Public Works Herbert Weeks,
Assistant Director of Public Works Glen Andler,
Village Engineer -Dennis Valentine, Director of
Community Development Kenneth Fritz and Village
Planner Steve Park. Also in the audience were 65
residents.
II. MINUTES
The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of
January 12, 1982 were accepted. The Mayor indicated
that in the future on certain subjects, she 'would
ask that a vote be recorded in the Minutes of the
Committee of the Whole meetings and other instances
the general consensus, can be reported.
III. MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD
Mayor Krause reviewed the history of the Mount Prospect
Road project indicating that the Village had been
approached by Cook County with a request to transfer
jurisdiction of the roadway from the County to the
municipality. During these initial discussions, the
staff had indicated to the County that the roadway
would have to be properly improved before the Village
would assume maintenance. These improvements would
include a remedy for poor soil conditions, curb and
gutter, storm drainage, and the inclusion of a seven
foot wide parking lane on the western edge of the
roadway. The County had agreed to assume those remedial
costs at its expense and then transfer jurisdiction
of the roadway to the municipality. Residents in the
area, however, disagreed with the improvements for fear
that the widening would increase traffic flows and
be detrimental to their properties. Mayor Krause
told the audience that after these meetings with
the residents and their subsequent petitions opposing
the project, the Mayor and the Board of Trustees had
concluded that there would be no improvement and
jurisdictional supervision of Mount Prospect Road would
remain with the County. The purpose of the Committee
of the Whole meeting and the invitation to the residents
in the area was to communicate that finding to them
and see if they had any objections to leaving the
roadway in its present state. The general feeling of
the people in the audience was approval of the Board's
position as exhibited by a number of voice approvals
and clapping. One resident at 408 Mount Prospect Road
indicated that he had a drainage problem in his front
yard and inquired as to how that problem would be
solved. Mr. Weeks, Director of Public Works, responded
that after the September meeting with the residents,
the Department of Public Works found a collapsed storm
sewer and this should partially solve the problem. A
resident at 410 Mount Prospect Road inquired as to
whether or not Cook County can special assess the
residents in the area and move ahead with the project
anyway, Mr. Art Kaindel, of the Cook County Highway
Department, indicated that no special assessment would
be, 'forthcoming as that is not the policy of Cook County
in regards to highway improvements. A resident from
108 Mount Prospect Road inquired as to whether or not
the County would install curbing and drainage along the
western edge of the roadway and not make the seven foot
widening. Mr. Kaindel responded that the County would
not install a partial project. A resident from 206
Mount Prospect Road indicated that he had water in the
basement in 1979 and wanted to know what size the storm
sewer was in the area. Mr. Weeks responded that in his
neighborhood, a storm sewer is 12 inches and flows into
a 15 inch. A resident from 110 South Mount Prospect
Road.inquired as to whether or not the County would
inform,residents in the future if the County decides
to make any improvements in the area. Mr. Kaindel
responded that the County's position is that nothing
will be done on Mount Prospect Road and that they will
spend their funds elsewhere. The resident at 110 South
Mount Prospect Road also stated his dissatisfaction with
the intersection inprovements at Central and Rand. The
Mayor pointed out that this was a combined Federal and
State project and not a Cook County project. There
being no further discussion from the audience, the Mayor
reiterated the position of the Village that it would not
accept jurisdictional transfer of Mount Prospect Road and
that no improvements would be installed pursuant to the
wishes of the residents living in that area. At that
time, 7:50 p.m.,'a recess was called.
-2-
........ . . ....
The meeting was reconvened at 8:00 p.m., with all
Trustees except Mr. Floros in attendance,
IV. ELECTRONIC GAMES - CAME ROOMS
Mayor Krause reviewed the history of this project
including the institution of a moratorium on the
licensing of games and game rooms which is to expire
at the end of March, 1982. The Mayor reviewed the
staff reports regarding'suggested text changes to the
Zoning Ordinance and suggested licensing procedures.
If the Committee of the Whole agreed in principle with
the changes expressed in the text amendment draft,
then that matter would have to go before the Zoning
Board of Appeals for public hearing and their recommenda-
tion. They would probably consider this matter at their
February 25 meeting. Trustee Miller inquired as to
the logic of the staff decision to differentiate among
restaurants. Mr. Park, of the Planning Department,
indicated that the classifications were established to
differentiate between fast-food operations and typical
sit-down restaurants based upon the theory that a fast-
food restaurant will havelesssupervision, less space
available for the machines, and is a higher intensity
of use within the building. Trustee Farley inquired
as to the requirement for 40 square feet per machine
and the staff responded that this would result in an
aggregate amount of square footage set aside for a
game room or games exclusive of exit ways. Trustee
Farley also suggested that the 1,000 foot distance
requirement might include churches. Trustee Arthur
reviewed several sections of definitions, and procedures
and requested the staff rationale as to why a tavern is
not included in the B-4 District. Mr. Park responded
that that has not been the development history in this
community and that taverns located in a B-4 District
tend to be in a highly retail area. Mayor Krause
commended the staff on the thorough job and preparation
of this draft and indicated that she was not in favor
of game rooms as a special use in B-1 and B-3 Districts
and they ought to be amortized out of those Districts.
Trustee Miller suggested that the definition of hotel/
motel have games permitted as an accessory use within
the Zoning Ordinance and it was the consensus of the
Board to add that definition. After some further general
discussion, the Committee of the Whole concluded that the
matter ought to be brought before the Zoning Board of
Appeals for their review and recommendations and that
the questions raised by the Board reiterated before
the Zoning Board of Appeals for their response.
-3-
Mayor Krause then reviewed the licensing and taxing,
Ordinance. Trustee Miller inquired as to the logic
of the tax differentiation between machines proposed
to be taxed at $100 when there are six or fewer and
$150 when there are seven or more. The Village Manager
indicated that he has discussed this matter with the
Village Attorney and the Attorney concludes that we
cannot legally differentiate, they must both, therefore,
have the same tax level. It was the consensus of the
Committee of the Whole that the tax level ought to be
$150 per machine. Trustee Arthur reviewed several
provisions of the draft and indicated that it would be
necessary to include a, provision to delete the current
license fee's from the Business License Ordinance. He
also suggested that the application be designed in
similar fashion to that which is used for liquor
licenses, Chapter 13, and that game room licenses
should have the same restrictions. Discussion then'
centered on the requirement that a resident manager/
supervisor be on site at all hours when the game room
is open to the public. > This is a provision, that is
similar in the liquor license Ordinance. Consensus
of the Committee of the Whole at that time was to make
it a requirement 'that 'owners and operators of game
rooms have a resident supervisor in attendance. Trustee
Miller'' inquired as to the penalties incorporated in the
draft and after some general discussion, it was
decided by the Committee of the Whole to change the
fast line of Item #9 to read in effect that licenses
for amusement devices may be suspended up for to one
(1) year if a violation is `found. After some further
discussion by the Committee of the Whole, members of
the audience were invited to address the issue.' The.
owner of Hotter than Mother`"s located at the intersection
of Northwest Highway and Route 83 indicated that he could
live with the tax level proposed in the Ordinance., but
inquired as to the application of a resident manager and
his existing special use permit.' The owner, Mr. Herman,
indicated that his business is a,fami'ly owned and
operated business and his family does not live in the
Village of Mount Prospect and this requirement would
mandate the hiring of an additional person merely to
comply to the requirement of the 'Ordinance. This
position was also expressed by the owner and operator
of the .rust 'Games Game Room. After some further
general discussion, the Committee of the Whole instructed
the Village'` Manager to'have `the Attorney prepare the
Ordinauce in its final form and that the Board could
act on the Ordinance while the Zoning Board is hearing
the general text of the proposed changes. Trustee
Wattenberg asked that the Board reconsider its 'position
,regarding the requirement for a resident manager and
the Mayor responded that that matter could be discussed
at any, time the Ordinance is being reviewed by the Board
of Trustees for final action.
4
V. MANAGER'S REPORT
The Village Manager updated the Committee of the
Whole on the status of LAKE MICHIGAN WATER indicating
that two items are now critical to further progress.
While negotiations with the City of Chicago have
proceeded favorably, we are still lacking an executed
written document. Additionally, there is the need
to acquire property for pumping stations and storage
tanks to the west of the Village of Mount Prospect and
the Agency has initiated the acquisition of this
property through the Agency Manager and the City Manager
in the respective communities.
The Manager reviewed the status of the 1982-1983 BUDGET
indicating that it would be delivered to the Mayor and
the Board either the weekend of January 29 or at the
Board meeting of February 2. The Manager reported that
after the review by the Finance Commission, minor non -
substantive changes have been made by the staff. During
discussion of the Budget, Mayor Krause indicated that
she foresaw a revenue need for future fiscal years and
requested that the administration prepare a series of
alternative revenue sources for review by the Board
this Spring. The revenue sources should try to approximate
additional revenues in the amount of $500,000 from sources
other than property tax, utility tax or an ambulance tax.
The Manager reported that the Director of Public Works
is still negotiating with suppliers and installers for
the improvements to WELL #17. No contracts or purchase
orders have been issued as of the date of the Committee
of the Whole meeting.
VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Trustee Arthur reported on his two meetings of Tuesday,
January 26 regarding the proposed Refuse Study through
the Northwest Municipal Conference. At a meeting this
afternoon, the Conference Study Committee is recommending
for review by the Conference Finance Committee a series
of alternative studies that would cost the Village of
Mount Prospect between $3,000 and $12,000. Trustee
Arthur reiterated his growing concern as to the need
of this Study, its costs and the implications for all
of our communities in the region. Mayor Krause asked
Trustee Arthur to keep the Board posted from time to
time as to the progress of this Study.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
Village Manager
TLB/rcw
Village of mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JANUARY 27, 1982
SUBJECT: RESTAURANT/LOUNGE SURVEY
The Bureau of Code Enforcement completed a survey of 24
liquor license holders (3oing business as restaurant/lounges
or lounges in Mount Prospect. A list of the businesses
surveyed follows along with the type of liquor license that
business holds:
ESTABLISHMENT CLASSIFICATION
Ken's Den A
Dover Inn B
El Sombrero B
Charlie Club B
Evans B
Red Lobster B
Mrs. P & Me A
Butch McGuire's A
Sam's Place B
Striking Lanes Lounge B
Four Season's B
Ye Old Town Inn B
Meat'n'Place B
Scotland Yard B
Reunion Restaurant B
Stagger Lee's B
Gaper's of Old Orchard B
Kampai Restaurant B
Jake's Pizza B
Midwest Liquors (VIP Lounge) A
Monterey Whaling Village B
Shogun Restaurant B
Second Dynasty B
Thunderbird Bowl Lounge B
The survey shows the restaurant area, a lounge area and
the kitchen area for each establishment and breaks these
areas into percentages of the business' total floor space.
The following results can be taken from the survey of the
24 businesses:
1: The average total floor area for these
businesses is 9,379 square feet.
2. The floor area use by percentage of
the total available space can be
computed to show the following averages:
Lounge Area Kitchen Area Restaurant Area Other
22% 15% 274/ 36% = 100%
The "Other" floor area use of 36%
includes the miscellaneous walkways,
club areas like the exercise rooms at
the Charlie Club, banquet rooms and
work areas,
Certain criteria had to be developed in order to correctly
measure and equalize the survey among all the businesses.
These criteria area:
1. The areas which were clearly segregated
were measured for their individual square
footage.
2. When an area was found where the restaurant
abuted the lounge, the dimensions were
determined by dividing the aisle between
the tables and bar, and then using the
divison line as an imaginary partition
to determine the area.
3. When calculations were supplied by the owner,
it was based upon the total building's square
footage listed in the building lease.
4. Some special circumstances did arise. In the
Shogun Restaurant, the lounge consisted of a
small table with bottles of liquor on it, where
drinks were prepared by the waitresses and
delivered to the tables.
In Mrs. P and Me, the entire bar and waiting
area was counted as part of the lounge.
Of the 24 businesses surveyed, only nine have lounge areas which
exceeded the 22% average floor area computed above. In cases
like the bowling alleys, health club, golf course coUntry club
and several restaurants, there are sizable areas of floor space
for the primary use of the business or for banquet facilities.
The Village could develop these percentage criteria for
lounge, restaurant and kitchen area into guidelines, or
minimum requirements, that liquor license applicants must
meet for approval of the license. This proposal would be
most acceptable for new construction, however, there will
likely be many exceptions brought forward by local entrepreneurs
who are trying to develop existing structures in the Village.
Some flexibility should be built into the system in order to
avoid the constant problems of applicants requesting variances
from the rules that have been established.
EDWARD A, 3FUCK
EAG/rcw
attachment
C: Village Manager Terrance L. Burghard
Village Attorney David Newman
MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JANUARY 26, 1982
I. ROLL _CALL
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Krause at
7:32 pm. in the Public Safety`Building, 112 East
Northwest Highway. Present at the meeting were:
Trustees Ralph Arthur, Gerald Farley, Edward. Miller,
Norma Murauskis and Ted Wattenberg. Absent from the
meeting because of a schedule conflict was Trustee
Floros. Also in attendance were Village Manager
Terrance Bu:rghard, Assistant Village Manager Edward
Geick, Director of Public Works Herbert Weeks,
Assistant Director of Public Works Glen Andler,
Village Engineer Dennis Valentine, Director of
Commun3-ty,Deve,lopment Kenneth Fritz and Village
Planner Steve Park. Alsointhe audience were 65
residents.
II. MINUTES
The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of
January 12,_1982 :were accepted. The Mayor indicated
that in the future,'on certain subjects, she would
ask that a vote be recorded in the Minutes of the
Committee of theWhole''meetings and other instances
the general consensus can be reported.
III. MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD
Mayor Krause reviewed the history of the Mount Prospect
Road project indicating that the Village had been
approached by Cook 'County with a request to transfer
jurisdiction of the roadway from the County to the
municipality. During these initial discussions, the
staff ',had indicated to the County that the roadway
would have to be properly improved before the Village
would assume maintenance. These improvements would
include a remedy for poor soil conditions, curb and
gutter, storm drainage, and the inclusion of a seven
foot wide parking lane on the western edge of the
roadway. The County had agreed to assume those remedial
costs at its expense and then transfer jurisdiction
of the roadway to the municipality. Residents in the
area, however, disagreed with the improvements for fear
that the widening would increase traffic flows and
be detrimental to their properties. Mayor Krause
told the audience that after.these meetings with
the residents and their subsequent petitions opposing
the project, the Mayor: and 'the Board of Trustees'"had
concluded that there would be no improvement and
jurisdictional supervision of Mount Prospect Road would
remain with the County. The purpose of the Committee
of the Whole meeting and the invitation to the residents
in the area was to communicate that finding to them
and see if they had any objections to leaving the
roadway in its present state. The general feeling of
the people in the audience was approval of the Board's
position as exhibited; by a number of voice approvals
:nd clapping. One resident at 408 Mount Prospect Road
indicated that be hada drainage problem in his front
yard and inquir d as to how that problem would be
solved. Mr. Weeks, Director of Public Works, responded
that after the September meeting with the residents,
the Department of Public Works found °a collapsed storm
sewer and this shouldpartially solve the problem. A
resident at 410 Mount: Prospect Road inquired as to
whether or not Cook County can -special assess the
residents in the area and move ahead with the project
anyway. Mr: Art Kaindel, of the Cook County Highway
Department, indicated that no 'special assessment would
be forthcoming as that is not the policy of Cook County
in regards to highway' improvements. A resident from
108 Mount Prospect Road inquired as to whether or not
the County would install curbing and drainage along the
western edge of the roadway and not make the seven foot
widening. Mr. Kaindel responded that the"'County'would
not install a partial project. A resident from 206
Mount Prospect Road indicated that he had water in the
basement in:1979''and wanted to know what size the storm
sewer was in the area. Mr. Weeks responded that "in his
neighborhood, a storm sewer is 12 inches and flows into
a 15 inch. A resident. from 110 South Mount Prospect
Road inquired as to whether or not the County would.
inform residents in the future if the County decides
to make anyimprovements in the area, Mr. Kaindel
responded that the County's position is that nothing
will be done on Mount Prospect Road and that they will
spend their funds elsewhere. The resident at 110 South
Mount Prospect Road also stated his dissatisfaction with
the intersection:inprovements at Central and Rand. The
Mayor pointed out that this was.a"combined Federal and
State project and not a Cook County project.' There
being no further discussion from the audience, the Mayor
reiterated the position of the Village that: it would not
accept jurisdictional transfer of Mount Prospect Road and
4 that no improvements would be installed pursuant to the
wishes of the residents living in that area. At that
time, 7:50 p.m. a recess was called,
2,_
The meeting was reconvened at 8:00 p.m., with all
Trustees except Mr. Floras in attendance.
IV. ELECTRONIC GAMES - GAME ROOMS
Mayor Krause reviewed the history of this project
including the institution of a moratorium on the
licensing of games and game rooms which is to expire
at the end of March, 198 ' 2. ' The Mayor reviewed the
staff reports regarding suggested text changes to the
Zoning Ordinance and suggested licensing procedures.
If the Committee of the Whole agreed in principle with
the changes expressed in the text amendment draft,
then that matter would have to go before the Zoning
Board of Appeals for public hearing and their recommenda-
tion. They would probably consider this matter at their
February 25 meeting. Trustee Miller inquired as to
the logic of the staff decision to differentiate among
restaurants. Mr. Park, of the Planning Department,
indicated that the classifications were established to
differentiate between fast-food operations and typical
sit-down restaurants based upon the theory that a fast-
-,food restaurant will have less supervision, less space
available for the machines, and is a higher intensity
of use within the building. Trustee Farley inquired
as to the requirement for 40 square feet per machine
and thd"staff resgond6d'tbat this would result in an
aggregate amount of square footage set aside for a
game room,or games exclusive of exit ways. Trustee
Farley also suggested -.that the 1,000 foot distance
requirement might include churches. Trustee Arthur
reviewed several sections of definitions, and procedures
and requested the staff rationale as to why a tavern is
not included in the B-4 District. Mr. Park responded
that that has not been the development history in this
community and that taverns located in a B-4 District
tend to be in a highly retail area. Mayor Krause
commended the staff on the thorough job and preparation
of thisdraft and indicated that she was not in favor
of game rooms as a special use in B-1 and B-3 Districts
and they ought to be amortized out of those Districts.
Trustee Miller suggested that the definition of hotel/
motel have games permitted as an accessory use within
the Zoning Ordinance and it was the consensus of the
Board to add that definition. After some further general
discussion, the Committee of the Whole concluded that the
matter ought to be brought before the Zoning Board of
Appeals for their review and recommendations and that
the questions raised by the Board reiterated before
the Zoning Board of Appeals for their response.
-3-
Mayor Krause then reviewed the licensing and taxing
Ordinance, Trustee Miller inquired as to the logic
of the tax differentiation between machines proposed
to be taxed at $100 when there are six or fewer and
$150 when there are seven or more. The Village Manager
indicated that he has discussed this matter with the
Village Attorney and the Attorney concludes that we
cannot legally differentiate, they must both, therefore,
have the same tax level. It was the consensus of the
Committee of the Whole that the tax level ought to be,
$150 per machine. Trustee Arthur reviewed several
provisions of the draft and indicated that it would be
necessary to include a provision to delete the current
license fees from the Business License Ordinance. He
also suggested that the application be designed in
similar fashion to that which is used for liquor
licenses, Chapter 13, and that game room licenses
should have the same restrictions. Discussion then
centered on the requirement that a residentmanager/
supervisor be on site at all hours when the; game room
is open to the public. < This is a provision that is
similar in the liquor license Ordinance. Consensus
of the Committee of the Whole at that time was to make
it a requirement that owners and operators of game `
rooms have a resident supervisor in attendance. Trustee
Miller inquired as to the penalties incorporated in the
draft and after some general discussion, it was
decided by the Committee of the Whole to change the
last line of Item #9 to read in effect that licenses
for amusement devices may be suspended up for to one
(1) year if a violation is found. After some further
discussion by the Committee of the Whole, members of
the audience were invited to address the issue. The
owner :of Hotter than Mother's located -at the intersection
of Northwest Highway and Route 83 indicated that he could
live with the tax level proposed in the Ordinance, but
inquired as, to the application of a resident manager and
his existing special use permit. The owner, Mr. Herman,
indicated that his business is a family owned and
operated business and his family does not live in the
Village of Mount Prospect and this requirement would
mandate the hiring of ,an additional person merely to
comply to the requirement of the Ordinance. This
position was also expressed; by the owner and operator
of the Just Games Game Room. After some further
general discussion, the Committee of the Whole instructed
the Village Manager to have the Attorney prepare the
Ordinance in its final form and that the Berard could'
act on the Ordinance while the Zoning Board is hearing
the general text of the proposed, changes. Trustee
Wattenberg asked that the'Board reconsider its position
regarding the requirement for a resident manager and
the Mayor responded that that matter could be discussed
at any time the Ordinance is being reviewed by the Board;
of Trustees for final action,
_4;-
V. MANAGER'S REPORT
The Village Manager updated the Committee of the
Whole on the status of LAKE MICHIGAN WATER indicating
that two items are now critical to further progress.
While negotiations with the City of Chicago have
proceeded favorably, we are still lacking an executed
written document. Additionally, there is the need
to acquire property for pumping stations and storage
tanks to the west of the Village of Mount Prospect and
the Agency has initiated the acquisition of this
property through the Agency Manager and the City Manager
in the respective communities.
The Manager reviewed the status of the 1982-1983 BUDGET
indicating that it would be delivered to the Mayor and
the Board either the weekend of January 29 or at the
Board meeting of February 2. The Manager reported that
after the review by the Finance Commission, minor non -
substantive changes have been made by the staff. During
discussion of the Budget, Mayor Krause indicated that
she foresaw a revenue need for future fiscal years and
requested that the administration prepare a series of
alternative revenue sources for review by the Board
this Spring. The revenue sources should try to approximate
additional revenues in the amount of $500,000 from sources
other than property tax, utility tax or an ambulance tax,
The Manager reported that the Director of Public Works
is still negotiating with suppliers and installers for
the improvements to WELL #17. No contracts or purchase
orders have been issued as of the date of the Committee
of the Whole meeting.
VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Trustee Arthur reported on his two meetings of Tuesday,
January 26 regarding the proposed Refuse Study through
the Northwest Municipal Conference. At a meeting this
afternoon, the Conference Study Committee is recommending
for review by the Conference Finance Committee a series
of alternative studies that would cost the Village of
Mount Prospect between $3,000 and $12,000. Trustee
Arthur reiterated his growing concern as to the need
of this Study, its costs and the implications for all
of our communities in the region. Mayor Krause asked
Trustee Arthur to keep the Board posted from time to
time as to the progress of this Study.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
Village Manager
TLB/rcw
ORDINANCE 140.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 13 ENTITLED
"ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR DEALERS, OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Chapter 13 entitled "Alcoholic Liquor Dealers"
of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois (1981) as
amended, is hereby further amended as follows:
A. Section 13.101 entitled "Definitions" of Article I
of said Chapter 13 is amended to add thereto a new term "Lounge"
to be definied as follows:
"LOUNGE: For the purpose of this Chapter a
"Loungellshall mean any public place
kept, used, maintained, advertised
and held out to the public as a place
where alcoholic liquor is offered for
sale at retail for consumption only
on the premises, and said term includes
therein "cocktail lounges", "bars" and
"taverns". A lounge may be maintained
and operated as a separate, independent
establishment or it may be included
within and be an accessory part of
another establishment, such as a restaurant,
hotel or bowling alley, primarily engaged
in a business or occupation other than that
of the sale and consumption of alcoholic
liquor."
B. Section 13.106 entitled "Licenses and Permits" of
Article I of said Chapter 13 is amended to add thereto a new
license classification to be described in sub -section A.1 as
follows:
"CLASS "S" license for issuance to restaurants
maintaining a separate lounge area as an accessory
use, which shall authorize the licensee to sell and
offer for sale at retail in the restaurant portion of
the premises specified in such license, alcoholic liquor
for consumption on said premises only with meals, and in
the lounge portion of the premises specified in such
license, alcoholic liquor for consumption on said
premises, with or without the service of food. The
premises licensed herein shall be primarily devoted
to the preparation, cooking and serving of meals
and the lounge area shall contain less than —% of
the floor area of the premises and shall -be maintained
separate from the restaurant area by means of a par-
tition, wall or other physical barrier."
and to require an annual license fee issued after April 30,,1981
as provided in sub -section A.2 to be as follows:
"License Classification Annual License Fee
Class S $____ 11
C. Section 13.107 entitled "Number of Licenses"
of Article I of said Chapter 13 is amended by changing sub-
section A. to read,as follows:
"A. There shall be issued in the Village no
more than:
1. Five (5) Class A licenses.
2. ( ) Class B licenses
3. Nine (9) Class C licenses.
4. Two (2) Class D licenses.
5. One Class E license.
6. Two (2) Class L licenses.
7. one Class M license.
8. One Class P license.
9. Twelve (12) Class R licenses
10. ( ) Class S licenses
11. One Class V license
12. Five (5) Class W licenses."
SECTION Two: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
upon its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in
accordance with law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1, 1982.
NAYES:
PUBLISHED this day of
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
1 1982 in pamphlet form.
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JANUARY 27, 1982
SUBJECT: RESTAURANT/LOUNGE SULVEY
The Bureau of Code Enforcement
completed a survey of 24
liquor license holders doing I
siness as restaurant/lounges
or lounges in Mount Prospect.
A list of the businesses
surveyed follows along with the
type of liquor license that
"usiness holds:
ESTABLISHMENT
CLASSIFICATION
Ken's Den
A
Dover Inn
B
El Sombrero
B
Charlie Club
B
Evans
B
Red Lobster
B
Mrs. P & Me
A
Butch McGuire's
A
Sam's Place
B
Striking Lanes Lounge
B
Four Season's
B
Ye Old Town Inn
B
Meat'n'Place
B
Scotland Yard
B
Reunion Restaurant
B
Stagger Lee's
B
Gaper's of Old Orchard
B
Kampai Restaurant
B
Jake's Pizza
B
Midwest Liquors (VIP Lounge) A
Monterey Whaling Village
B
Shogun Restaurant
B
Second Dynasty
B
Thunderbird Bowl Lounge
B
The survey shows the restaurant' area, a lounge area and
the kitchen area for each establishment and breaks these
areas into percentages of the business' total floor space.
The following results can be taken from the survey of the
24 businesses:
1. The average total floor area for these
businesses is 9,379 square feet.
2. The floor area use by percentage of
the total available space can be
computed to show the following averages:
L2yn &eArta Kitchen Area Restaurant Area Other
22% 15% 27% 3614 = 100%
The "Other" floor area use of 36%
includes the miscellaneous walkways,
club areas like the exercise rooms at
the Charlie Club, banquet rooms and
work areas,
Certain criteria had to be developed in order to correctly
measure and equalize the survey among all the businesses.
These criteria area:
1. The areas which were clearly segregated
were measured for their individual square
footage.
2. When an area was found where the restaurant
abuted the lounge, the dimensions were
determined by dividing the aisle between
the tables and bar and then using the
divison line as an imaginary partition
to determine the area.
3. When calculations were supplied by the owner,
it was based upon the total building's square
footage listed in the building lease.
4. Some special circumstances did arise. In the
Shogun 1�estaurant, the lounge consisted of a
small table with bottles of liquor on it, where
drinks were prepared by the waitresses and
delivered to the tables.
In Mrs, P and Me,, the entire bar and waiting
area was counted as part of the lounge.
Of the 24 businesses surveyed, only nine have lounge areas which
exceeded the 22% average floor area computed above. In cases
like the bowling alleys, health club, golf course country club
and several restaurants, there are sizable areas of floor space
for the primary use of the business or for banquet facilities.
P I—
The Village could develop these percentage criteria for
lounge, restaurant and kitchen area into guidelines, or
minimum requirements, that liquor license applicants must
meet for approval of the license. This proposal would be
most acceptable for new construction, however, there will
likely be many exceptions brought forward by local entrepreneurs
who are trying to develop existing structures in the Village.
Some flexibility should be built into the system in order to
avoid the constant problems of applicants requesting variances
from the rules that have been established.
�k
EDWARD A. E
EAG/rcw
attachment
C: Village Manager Terrance L. Bu-r.-gbard
Village Attorney David Newman
411"
"MOUNTYROSPECT FIRE DEPA" -INT
BUREAU OF CODE ENFORCEMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Lawrence A. Pairitz, Fire Chief
FROM: Les Hanneman, Code Enforcement officer
Phil Knudsen, Code Enforcement Officer
January 12, 1982
SUBJECT: RESTAURANT/LOUNGE SURVEY
A total of twenty-four establishments were inspected on the dates of
January 2, 3, 9 and 10, 1982. Each establishment is listed by name and
address. Measurements were taken of the kitchen, lounge and restaurant
areas to determine the percentage of the floor area. The figurer for the
total floor area are noted to show how they were determined.
If you have any questions regarding any of this information, please contact
Phil Knudsen or Les Hanneman.
LHIrm
Attach.
RESTAURANT/LOUNGE SURVEY
tJanuary 2,3,9,10, 1982__
KEN'S DEN
501 Ididwaq Dr.
1802 S. Elmhurst
Rd.
Kitchen area
- 972
Kitchen area
- 128
sq.
ft.
Lounge area
- 530
sq.
ft.
Restaurant area
- 265
sq.
ft.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 1272
sq.
ft.
DOVER INN
1702 W. Al onauin Rd.
11=tchen area - 1211 sq- ft.
Lounge area - 963 sq. ft.
Restaurant area - 1550 sq. ft.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA - 6076 sq. ft.
EL SOMBRERO
1100 S. Elmhurst Rd.
Kitchen area - 1086 sq. ft.
Lounge area - 357 sq. ft.
Restaurant area - 1961 sq. ft.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA - 4400 sq. ft.
CHARLIE CLUB
501 Ididwaq Dr.
113 S. Emerson
Kitchen area
- 972
sq, ft.
Lounge area
- 3401
sq. ft.
Restaurant area
- 1230
sq. ft.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
-58,000
sq.ft.
EVANS
113 S. Emerson
Kitchen area
- 732
sq.
ft.
Lounge area
- 220
sq.
ft.
Restaurant area
- 1478
sq.
ft.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 3100
sq.
ft.
RED LOBSTER
2200 S. Elmhurst Rd.
Kitchen area - 1183 sq. ft.
Lounge area - 403 sq, ft.
Restaurant area - 1555 sq. ft.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA - 7050 sq. ft.
MRS. P & ME
100 E
Kitchen area
- 494
sq.
ft.
Lounge area
- 522
sq.
ft.
Restaurant area
- 1212
sq.
ft.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 2791
sq.
ft.
- percentage of the floor area 10%
- percentage of the floor area 42%
- percentage of the floor area 21%
- remaining floor area 27%
-percentage of the floor area 20%
- percentage of the floor area 16%
- percentage of the floor area 26%
- remaining floor area 38%
- percentage of the floor area 25%
- percentage of the floor area 8%
- percentage of the floor area 45%
- remaining floor area 28%
- percentage of the floor area 2%
- percentage of the floor area 6%
- percentage of the floor. area 2%
- remaining floor area 90%
- percentage of the floor area 24%
- percentage of the floor area 7%
- percentage of the floor area 48%
- remaining floor area 21%
- percentage of the floor area 17%
- percentage of the floor area 6%
- percentage of the floor area 22%
- remaining floor area 55%
- percentage of the floor area 18%
- percentage of the floor area 19%
- percentage of the floor area 43%
- remaining floor area 20%
PESTAURANTILOUNGE SURVL,
January 2,3,9,10, 1982
Page 2
BUTCH MC GUIRES
300 E. Rand Rd.
Kitchen area -
207
sq.ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
6%
Lounge area -
1914
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
58%
Restaurant area -
380
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
12%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
3285
sq.
ft.
-
remaining
floor. area
26%
SAWS PLACE
15 W. Prospect Ave.
Kitchen area -
439
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
34%
Lounge area -
425
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
33%
Restaurant area -
234
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
18%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
1300
sq.
ft.
-
remaining
floor area
15%
STRIKING LANES LOUNGE
1050 S. Elmhurst Rd.
Kitchen area -
558
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
2%
Lounge area -
3013
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
9%
Restaurant area -
1093
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
3%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
33450
sq.
ft.
-
remaining floor area
86%
FOUR SEASON'S
299 W. Central Rd.
Kitchen area -
660
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
fl.00r
area
1%
Lounge area -
838
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
14%
Restaurant area -
2870
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
47%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
6129
sq.
ft.
-
remaining
floor area
38%
YE OLD TOWN INN
18 W. Busse Ave.
Kitchenarea -
529
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
12%
Lounge area -
1903
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
42%
Restaurant area -
1311
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
29%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
4564
sq.
ft.
-
remaining floor area
17%
MEAT'N PLACE
'999 N. Elmhurst Rd.
Kitchen area -
1352
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
46%
Lounge area -
669
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
23%
Restaurant area -
911
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
31%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
2932
sq.
ft.
-
kitchen area is shared with Tartan Tray
SCOTLAND YARD
253 E. Rand Rd.
Kitchen area -
1394
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
27%
Lounge area -
814
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
16%
Restaurant area -
1396
sq.
ft.
-
percentage
of
the
floor
area
27%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
5130
sq.
ft.
-
remaining
floor area
30%
RESTAURANT/LOUNGE SURVE
January 2,3,9,10, 1982,
RE -UNION RESTAURANT
- 447
sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor
area 10%
Lounge area
- 1105
sq.
ft. -
999 N. Elmhurst Rd.
area 23%
Restaurant area
- 1989
sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor
area 42%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 4720
Kitchenarea -
1364
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
27%
Lounge area -
358
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
7%
Restaurant area -
2497
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
50%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
4980
sq.
ft. -
remaining
floor area
Kitchen area
16%
STAGGER LEES
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
0%
Lounge area
- 1807
303 E. Kensington Rd.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
100%
Restaurant area
Kitchen area -
264
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
5%
Lounge area -
2290
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor.
area
43%
Restaurant area -
1458
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
27%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
5314
sq.
ft. -
remaining
floor area
Kitchen area
25%
GAPER'S OF OLD ORCHARD
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
13%
Lounge area
700 W. Rand Rd.
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
24%
Restaurant area
Kitchen area -
944
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
5%
Lounge area -
2775
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
15%
Restaurant area -
1120
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
6%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -
18000
sq.
ft. -
remaining floor area
74%
KAMPAI RESTAURANT
2330 S. Elmhurst Rd.
Kitchen area
- 447
sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor
area 10%
Lounge area
- 1105
sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor
area 23%
Restaurant area
- 1989
sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor
area 42%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 4720
sq.
ft. *** -
remaining floor area
25%
JAKE'S PIZZA
302 W. Northwest_f_Wv__
Kitchen area
- 978
sq.ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
21%
Lounge area
- 525
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
11%
Restaurant area
- 2370
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
50%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 4730
sq.
ft. *** -
remaining
floor area
18%
14IDWEST LIQUORS,
INC. (V.I.P.
LOUNGE)
2803 W, -Algonquin
Rd.
�-
Kitchen area
- 0
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
0%
Lounge area
- 1807
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
100%
Restaurant area
- 0
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
0%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 1807
sq.
ft. -
remaining
floor area
0%
I-17ONTEREY WHALING
VILLAGE
999 N. Elmhurst Rd.
Kitchen area
- 795
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
13%
Lounge area
- 1453
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
24%
Restaurant area
- 2122
sq.
ft. -
percentage
of
the
floor
area
34%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 6176
sq.
ft. -
remaining
floor area
29%
RESTAURANT/LOUNGE SURVE
January 2,3,9,10,
1.982
Page 4
SHOGUN RESTAURANT
1176 S. Elmhurst Rd.
Kitchen area
- 242 sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor area
.17%
Lounge area
- 30 sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor area
1%
Restaurant area
- 605 sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor area
420
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 1436 sq.
ft. -
remaining floor area
40%
SECOND DYNASTY
1510 N. Elmhurst Rd.
Kitchen area
- 783 sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor area
15%
Lounge area
- 443 sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor area
9%
Restaurant area
- 1474 sq.
ft. -
percentage of the fic()r area
29%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 5104 sq.
ft. -
remaining floor area
47%
THUNDERBIRD BOWL LOUNGE
821 E. Rand Rd.
Kitchen area
- 0 sq.ft. -
percentage of the floor area
0%
Lounge area
- 1681 sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor area
5%
Restaurant area
- 0 sq.
ft. -
percentage of the floor area
0%
TOTAL FLOOR AREA
- 33360 sq.
ft. -
remaining floor area
95%
** Kitchen and restaurant area is a separate business.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA COMPUTED FROM ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA INFORMATION GIVEN BY OWNER.
TOTAL FLOOR AREA -INFORMATION FROM PERMIT PLANS.
February 1, 1982
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PROPOSED 1982-83 BUDGET
In the preparation of the 1982-83 budget the goal of the Public Works Depart-
ment was to maintain current service levels and reduce expenditures. In
these difficult economic times that goal was difficult to attain Considering
the skyrocketing costs of our resource materials. Highlighting some of our
service areas and concerns in this budget process I offer the following
summary:
Personnel:
Through attrition there was the reduction of one full time
position in our day labor force. There was then two part
time workers hired for later afternoon and evening work.
This move resulted in a reduction of overtime hours for full
time staff and a savings to the Village in the cost of
employee fringe benefits as well as lower base salaries.
Continued employment of two Prospect High School Students
under their diversified education program and the services
of three senior citizens on a part time basis has increased
the productive capabilities of the full time staff.
Maintaining service levels and programs with less than
250 of the available labor force of other Northwest subur-
ban communities of comparable size.
Forestry:
The proposal as submitted will realize a $40,000 savings
from last year and raise some areas of service. Contractual
tree trimming dollars are reduced and will result in extend-
ing periods between trimming cycles unless our crews can
pick up the difference.
Inclusion of a projected expenditure for tree removal.
The funds as shown are estimated to provide contractual re-
moval service for approximately 1/2 of the elm trees which
will be infected with dutch elm disease this year. The
remainder of the trees will be removed by our own labor
force. The philosophy behind this proposal is that the
sooner a known diseased tree is removed the less chance
there is of infecting adjacent healthy trees.
We have a share cost parkway tree replacement program where-
by residents pay $35.00 and the Village pays the remainder
to replace missing parkway trees. The share cost program is
for purchase of a bagged and balled tree of 2Y' diameter
and carries a one year warranty. Unfortunately, our parkway
reforestration program is not keeping pace with the removals
so we have included in the budget a nominal amount of money
to plant l-," bare root trees in those areas where there is
PROPOSED 1982-83 BUDGET t) Page / 2
Forester: (Con't)
.1 . . ........
no resident participation. These trees will not carry a
warranty and will be considerably smaller than standard,
but with a good success on growth we stand a chance to en-
hance the appearance of the community by replacing missing
trees.
Street Maintenance:
Starting a pilot experiment in using a Petromat covering
which is projected to increase the life of the street and
eventually result in a savings to the Village. As this
covering must be professionally applied, we are reducing
the amount of MFT funds normally spent by the Public Works
Department and shifting it to the Engineering Division
account to be used for the contractual resurfacing program.
Planned reduction in frequency of street cleaning operation
and try to prolong life of existing street sweeping machines.
E.g� �ipiaent Maintenance and ope.ration:
While the cost of replacing equipment is high we are on
a planned replacement schedule and we are starting to
realize a cost savings in replacement parts by getting rid
of the older units. With the cost of gasoline continuing
to esculate we have been purchasing diesel powered equip-
ment which is proving to be more economical in cost of fuel
and performance. Continued emphasis on designing replace-
ment equipment to be economical and serve dual purposes
if possible.
Water Distribution Sy��tem:
Repair/replacement costs reduced through introduction of
a new type of repair sleeve which is as effective as the
old style sleeve. Continued planned improvements to the
water distribution system are in accordance with recommenda-
tions developed in a computer analysis study. It is pro-
jected that minimal work and expense will be involved to
upgrade the distribution system for acceptance of water
from Lake Michigan. With the recommended approval of
this years water system improvements and next fiscal
years planned improvements, our distribution system should
be adequate. Plans will be developed this fiscal year to
address the remaining requirements for acceptance of a new
water source. They include in part:
*Interconnections to Venture system.
*Special valving at the elevated tank
*A study on recirculation of water in the storage
tanks to provide a fresh supply and to prevent freezing
*Planned phase out Of low producing wells to be con-
sistent with IDOT requirements and conform to our
allocation permit schedule.
PROPOSED 1982-83 BUDGET t)
. ... . ........ . . Page / 3
Water Meters:
Planned reduction in meter replacement program scope to in-
clude longer span between changes. The pilot program of
leak detection services has revealed location of some water
leaks of which we were not aware. Repair of these leaks
and planned continuation of leak detection program will
reduce our unaccounted for water loss.
Administration & SuPLIO—rt:
Studies performed during the past year have resulted in
combining some telephone services and eliminating others
which has resulted in a 20% reduction in budget request
for this service.
En ineerin Division:
Through concentrated efforts our MFT accounts are being
cleared up and have resulted in some credits being
applied to our accounts.
To summarize, I feel that our staff is heeding the call for fiscal responsi-
bility and will continue in their efforts to effect further cost savings
in the months ahead. Keeping in mind the service level which we are trying
to maintain, I would welcome constructive recommendations for ways and means
to further reduce this budget request.
Ierbert 4 Weeks
HW: 1
Attachments
Population
Emplcyees(Tbtal)
Engineering Stafl
Suffrrex Help
Peiiranent
Part Tim
Sueeping Miles
S w— ,
eoi.ng
Mechanics
Vehicles:
Public Works
Administration
Police
Leaf Program
Salting:
Each Callout
Procedure
Plowing:
Each Callout
Haul Snow Away
Fran Downtown
Vacant Lots Cut
ROW Cutting
Forestry:
DTployees
Tree Purchasing
Tree Size
L: L 1-1,11 J.
Hoffman
Park
Mount
es
Arlington
Estates
Rida9-
Plaines
a
Heigil s
37,000
38,000
52,600
53,300
53,500
63,000
71,000
52
45
61
94
79
105
88
5
3
7
Not P.W.
INot P.W.
12
Not P.W.
10-12
12
22
6-8
6
7
2-16
2
0
6
None
2
0
1
125
115.5
150
120
216
250
212
. ..... . . . ......
4 tires
9 tires
See *2
Weekly
See *3
Monthly
Monthly
Pyear
per Y---ar
. ...... . . .......... . .
. .
. ..... .
6
5
5
9
I 8
I 7
11
40
60
57
94
90
260
82
20
6
10
0
15
49
.. . .. ..... ------
20
20
24
20
0
40
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
INo
No
8-10
3
9 -Large
8
10
10
15
1 -Small
See *1
See *1
See *1
100%
See *1
See *5
See *1
15
17
18
23
34
21
24
When
INeeded
As
No
Yes
Yes
No
Necessary
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Partial
Partial
No
Yes
I
2 or 3
3
See *6
1
6 None
6
50-50
Res
$35
50-50
see *4
Village All
do all
Res.
—tNo
—Min.
No
2�" Min.
2�;"-Rin.
None
Softwood
*1 - Corners, hills, curves
*2 - Average twice a week downtown and once a weaek for the rest of the
tout during spring/simmer/fall
*3 - Dow nto-;n three tures week - Four tires a year for the rest of town
*4 - I to W' on 50-50 plan - over city pays $17.50
*5 - Collector streets, snow routes first - residential as tine permits
*6 - Average number assigned during s=nares and fall ninths only
December 10, 1981
PROJECTED5-YEAR EQUIPMENT REPLACE1,1ENT PROGRAM
. .... . ... .. ...
Description 1981782 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 19E
Water Division
1968 Ford Truck W/CB Cleaner (2729) $85,000
1974
Dodge Van (2722)
17,000
1970
Dodge Dump Truck
(2726)
34,000
1970
Tractor Backhoe
(2717)
52,000
1971
Flatbed Trailer
(2733)
13,000
1972
Dodge Pickup (2734)
10,500
1971
Dodge Dump Truck
(2727)
34,000
1971
Dodge Dump Truck
(2728)
34,000
*Utility vehicle
$385,000
6"000
Water Division
$285,500
Street Division
1972 John Deere Riding Mower w/
Blower (4508)
1.2,000
1968 Dodge Dump Truck (4526)
34,000
1968SelmaManlift (4539)
and
42,500
1973 Dodge Van (4523)
*Pickup Truck
11,000
$99,500
Combined Total
$385,000
Water Division
1968 Chevrolet Tow Truck Chassis
(2713)
25,500
1970 Chevrolet Step Van (2730)
16,000
1972 Dodge Dump Truck (2752)
39,000
1972 Dodge Pickup Chassis (2712)
9,500
1972 Dodge Dump Truck (2753)
39,000
1973 Dodge Van (2721)
18,000
Total Water Division $147,000
Street Division
1967 Asphalt Roller W/Trailer (4525) 15,000
1974 Dodge Pickup (4511) 12,000
1972 Dodge Dump Truck (4509) 39,000
1976 Dodge Station Wagon (Pool Car t7) 6,500
Total Street Division $72,500
521 5.500
Projected 4 -Year Equipment I acement Program
Continued - Page 2
-
December 10, 1981
-)eScriotion 1981-82
Water Division
.,964 IR Air Compressor (2720)
1973 Ford Sewer Jet (2738)
1968 Ford Cab Over Dump (2724)
1973 Chevrolet Step Van (2735)
Total water Division
Street Division
1973 Elgin Street Sweeper (4502)
1969 Leaf Machine (4531)
1972 Dodge Dump Truck (4510)
1972 Int. Dump Truck (4512)
1972 Int..Dump Truck (4513)
1973 Bombadier Snow Plow (4534)
1972 Brush Chipper (4515)
1974 Dodge Van (Pool Car #9)
Total Street Division
Combined Total
Water Division
1977 Dodge Pickup (2715)
1974 J.D. Tractor Loader w/Backhoe (2739)
1975 Dodge 1 -Ton Dump (2742)
Total water Division
Street Division
1973 Elgin Street Sweeper (4504)
1970 Leaf Machine (4532)
1973 4 to 6 Ton Asphalt Roller (4535)
1978 AMC 4 -Dr. Sedan (Pool Car 41)
1978 AMC 4 -Dr. Sedan (Pool Car 42)
1978 AMC 4 -Dr. Sedan (Pool Car #3)
Total Street Division
Combined Total
1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985
12,000
55,000
25,000
18,000
$110,000
75,000
15,000
42,000
42,000
42,000
28,000
15,000
11,000
$270,000
$380,000
12,000
65,000
2 5 _q_0O
$102,060
85,000
16,000
25,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
$150,000
$252,000
>rojected 5 -Year Equipment Re ;ement Program
7ontinued - Page / 3
-s cember 10, 1981
,E 1981-82 1982-83
..,cription
1983-84 1984-85 1985-
--
Water Division
;-368 Flexible Sewer Rodder (2750)
24,0
1979 Chevrolet 4 -Door Sedan (2711)
10,()
1973 GMC Step-Van/TV Truck (2737)
70,0
1975 International Dump Truck (2740)
45,0
1978 Chevrolet 4 -Wheel Drive Pickup Truck (2744)
13,C
1978 Chevrolet Truck (2745)
12,C
Dotal Water Division
$174,(
Street Division
-4
1979 Chevrolet -Door Hatch (Pool Car #4)
9,(
1979 Chevrolet 4 -Door Hatch (Pool Car -ru6)
9,(
1973 J.D. Wheel Loader (4506)
80,(
!1978 Chevrolet Pickup Truck (4529)
12,(
1975 international Dump. Truck (4537)
45,(
otal Street Division
7
$155,(
Combined Total
$329,1
New Equipment
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PROPOSED EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE
1982-83
Proposed
Vehicle Replacement Bid Payout
No. Descript
Cost Date Date
Street Division
4509
1972 Dodge Dump Truck
$39,000
Dec.
March ,
4511
1974 Dodge Pickup Truck
12,000
Nov.
February
4525
1967 Asphalt Roller w/
trailer
15,000
Jan.
z,,arch
47
1976 Dodge Aspen
6,500
June
August
Total Street Division
$72,500
Water Division
2712
1972 Dodge Pickup Truck
9,500
Nov.
February
2713
1968 Chev. Cab/Chassis
25,500
July
November
2721
1973 Dodge Van
18,000
June
September
2730
1970 Chev. Step Van
16,000
November
April
2752
1972 Dodge Dump Truck
39,000
December
March
2753
1972 Dodge Dump Truck
39,000
December
March
Total Water Division
$147,000
Combined Total .........
$219,500
Village of M,.,—.nt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois t
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: February 3, 1982
SUBJECT: Computer
In the current budget there is $13,000 for purchase of a computer
terminal for Public Works and $5,000 for computer programming.
When these funds were originally requested last year, it was deter-
mined that they would be adequate for the installation of a
satellite computer at the Public Works garage. One of the main
goals that we were trying to achieve was the capability to instantly
retrieve information relative to the status of the working budget
and get a good handle on encumbered andunencumbered expenses. In
addition we wanted to add vehicle maintenance programming and
inventory control for a starter.
We thoroughly investigated the means with which to secure a system
and we now have ascertained that if we go via telephone line inter-
connection between Public Works and the Village Hall we will need to
purchase approximately $9,000 worth of additional equipment to make
this possible. The other alternative would be to string a hard line
cable between the Public Safety building and the Public Works building
at a cost of approximately $4,000. Misgivings we have on this latter
idea is at least one easement will be required and the telephone
company has been reluctant to give us permission to attach anything
to their poles. Finally, in the event that we ever move from the
present site, the installation will be worthless. There is also
some concern that the distance of 4,000 ft. may be stretching the
limitations of the existing equipment.
In conclusion, I have discussed this thoroughly with John Hedstrom
and being cognizant of the disc storage space which is available
in the present computer at the Village Hall and the uncertainty
of whether the system can take on any new projects or be able to
furnish information that I would be seeking, I have come to the
conclusion that it would be in the best interests of the Village
that this equipment not be ordered this fiscal year. If the
present system can be modified or improved within the next fiscal
year, it would be my recommendation that I be allowed to re -submit
a request for the computer on the 1983184 budget.
ti r ert L. Weeks
hlw;jm
cc - John fledstroml/
Village of MoU'nt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
1411
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1982
SUBJECT: STAFFING REPORT
A final report summary on Village employees is attached.
The head count differs somewhat from the original report I
submitted to you on January 6, 1982. These differences
occur partially because of my use of prior budgets for the
calculations and because changes in staffing assignments
during the budget year are not anticipated and are not shown
in the budget document.
To verify the figures, I have reviewed each Department's
staffing history with the respective Department Director.
Guidelines were established to clarify where and how employees
should be listed in the Departmental reports that these
Directors initially prepared. These guidelines are as
follows:
GUIDELINES
1. Count each employee as a whole body. Do not
split the person and count them as a .5 or similar
just because they aren't working a full week.
2. Count the temporary help hired during the summer
and make a determination of how many such employees
are to be hired.
3. Do not count interns for schools or similar
types of employees unless they were anticipated in
each Budget. Do not add after -the -fact employees
who may be hired in mid -year to perform a task that
unexpectedly came up.
TYPES OF EMPLOYMENT
1. Full -Time: An. employee working on a regular
basis for 372, 40 or 50.6 hours per week,
2. Regular Part -Time: An employee working on a
regular basis for less than standard hourly work
weeks of 372, 40 or 50.6 hours per week. These
employees must also work more than 600 or 1000
hours per year to qualify for IMRF benefits based
upon the new changes in the pension laws.
3. Temporary Part -Time: An employee working on a
temporary basis for a specified time, by contract, or
one who is not employed on a regular daily basis.
4. Volunteers: Unpaid people who donate their time
and services to the Village or paid -on-call employees
like volunteer firefighters.
The Departmental reports as you normally see them in the budget
are also attached. These reports can become the official
staffing record as you had suggested previously. If you want,
these pages can also be set up for inclusion in the final
Budget document for the 1982-1983 Budget.
EAG/rcw
attachments
1982-1983 BUDGET WORKSHEET
STAFFING REPORT
Full-Time=FT Part-Time=PT*
Includes regular part-time and temporary part-time employees
such as crossing guards, summer help, and temporary people
under grants.
Does not include volunteer firefighters or Director of
Bureau of Emergency Preparedness.
2/4/82.
PROPOSED
78-79
79-80
80-81
81-82
82-83
DEPARTMENT
FT
PT
FT
PT
FT
PT
FT
PT
FT PT
Manager's Office
6
1
3
3
3
2
3
0
3 0
Management Services
13
5
14
5
13
4
12
4
12 5
Police
76
16
77
16
78
17
81
17
81 17
Fire **
79
2
79
2
79
2
74
2
73 2
Health and Senior
Services
5
7
5
7
5
7
5
6
5 6
Community Dvlp.
2
3
4
3
4
4
5
4
5 4
Public Works
63
25
62
25
62
27
61
29
61 29
244
59
244
61
244
63
241
62
240 63
303
305
307
303
303
Includes regular part-time and temporary part-time employees
such as crossing guards, summer help, and temporary people
under grants.
Does not include volunteer firefighters or Director of
Bureau of Emergency Preparedness.
2/4/82.
STAFFING HISTORY
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION
POSITION
Mayor
Liquor Commissioner
Trustees
*Mayor also serves as Liquor Commissioner
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
PROPOSED
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
6
7*
7*
7*
7*
STAFFING HISTORY
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
POSITION
1974-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
Village Manager
1
1
1
1
Assistant Village Manager
1
1
1
1
Administrative Secretary
1
1
1
1
Public Information Officer (PT)
1
-
-
-
Microfilm Technician (PT)
1
1
-
-
Microfilm Coordinator (PT)
1
1
-
-
TOTAL
6
5
3
3
STAFFING HISTORY
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
PROPOSED
POSITION
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
Director of Management Services
1
1
1
1
Assistant to Director of Management
Services 1
1
1
1
Comptroller
1
1
1
1
Office Manager (PT)
1
-
-
-
Secretary II
1
1
1
1
Senior Account Clerk
2
3
4
3
Account Clerk I
4
2
1
2
Data Entry Clerk
1
1
-
-
Switchboard Operator (PT)
2
2
2
2
Account Clerk (PT)
-
1
1
2
Village Clerk - Elected (PT)
1
-
-
-
Village Clerk Appointed
1
1
1
1
Secretary I
2
2
2
2
Offset Operator (PT)
1
1
1
1
TOTAL
19
17
16
17
STAFFING HISTORY
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
PROPOSED
POSITION
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
Chief
1
1
1
1
Deputy Chief
1
1
1
1
Commander
2
1
1
1
Lieutenant
2
3
3
3
Watch Commander
5
5
5
1
Shift Sergeant
3
3
3
3
Police Officers
43
43
43
43
Investigators
3
4
4
4
Juvenile & Investigations
1
1
1
1
Juvenile Officer
1
1
1
1
School Counselor
1
1
1
1
Police Assistant
6
6
8
8
Office Supervisor/Secretary
1
1
1
1
Secretary II
1
1
1
1
Records Clerk
4
4
5
5
Crossing Guard (PT)
16
17
17
11
Explorer Crossing (PT)
-
-
-
-
Bike Safety Aide
1
1
1
1
Clerk/Typist
1
-
-
-
Secretary I
-
1
1
1
TOTAL
93
95
98
98
STAFFING HISTORY
FIRE & EMERGENCY
PROTECTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
PROPOSED
POSITION
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
Chief
1
1
1
1
Deputy Chief
1
1
1
1
Administrative Aide
1
1
1
1
Captains
4
4
3
3
Lieutenants
9
9
9
9
Firefighters
28
28
28
19
Fire/Paramedic
17
17
17
26
Radio Operator
4
4
-
-
Senior Mechanic
1
1
1
1
Mechanic
1
1
1
1
Director of Code Enforcement
1
1
1
1
Fire/Inspector
3
3
3
2
Plumbing Inspector
1
1
1
-
Structural Inspector
2
2
2
2
Electrical Inspector
1
1
1
1
Office Supervisor/Secretary
1
1
2
2
Secretary II
2
2
1
1
Secretary I
1
1
1
1
Regular Part Time
2
2
2
2
Director - Bureau of Emergency Services &
-
-
-
-
Diaster Agency (ESDA) Part Time*
20
20
20
20
TOTAL
81
81
76
75
*Volunteer Firefighters - Not counted in total.
STAFFING HISTORY
HEALTH AND SENIOR CENTER
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
PROPOSED
POSITION
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
Health Services Director
1
1
1
1
Secretary II
1
1
1
1
Sanitarian
1
1
1
1
Environmental Intern (PT)
2
2
1
1
Blood Donor Chairperson (PT)
1
1
1
1
Senior Citizen Coordinator
1
1
1
1
Outreach Caseworker
1
1
1
1
Secretary(PT)
2
2
2
2
Nurse (PT)
1
1
1
1
Employment Counselor (PT)
1
1
1
1
TOTAL
12
12
11
11
STAFFING HISTORY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
PROPOSED
POSITION
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
Director
1
1
1
1
Planner
1
1
1
1
Secretary II
1
1
1
1
Assistant Planner
-
1
1
1
Secretary I (PT)
1
1
1
1
Zoning Officer
1
1
1
1
Interns (PT)
2
2
3
3
TOTAL
7
8
9
9
STAFFING HISTORY
PUBLIC WORKS
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
PROPOSED
POSITION
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
Director
1
1
1
1
Deputy Director
1
1
1
1
Superintendent
2
3
3
3
Office Supervisor/Secretary
1
1
1
1
Secretary
2
2
2
2
Custodian
5
5
4
4
Foremen -
5
5
5
5
Forester
1
-
-
-
Maintenance Personnel
31
31
31
31
Mechanics
5
5
5
5
Water Engineer (Draftsman)
1
1
1
1
Electrician
-
-
-
-
Part Time Maintenance (Regular)
4
4
4
4
Part Time/Summer (Temporary)
18
20
22
22
Village Engineer
1
1
1
1
Traffic Engineer
-
1
-
-
Traffic Technician
1
-
1
1
Civil Engineer (Project Engineer)
1
1
2
2
Engineering Assistants
3
3
2
2
Secretary II
1
1
1
1
Part Time Draftsman
1
1
1
1
Part Time/Summer-Engineering (Temporary)
1
1
1
1
Parking Meter Repair/Collection (PT)
1
1
1
1
TOTAL
87
89
90
90
MINUTE'S
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JANUARY 12, 1982
Z. ROLL CAhL
The meeting was called. to order by Mayor Krause at
7:30 p.m, in the Public Safety Building, 112 East
Northwest Highway. Present at the meeting were:
Trustees Ralph Arthur, Gerald Earley, Leo Floros,
Norma'Murauskis and Ted Wattenberg.Absent was
Trustee Edward Miller, Also in attendance were
Assistant Village Manager Ge'iek, Fire Chief Lawrence
Pai.ritz, Police Chief Ronald Pavlock, Director of
Public Works Herbert Weeks, Assistant Director of
Public Works Glen Andler, Village Engineer Dennis
Valentine, representatives from the press and one
person in the audience.
II, MINUTES
The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of
December 8, 1981 were accepted and filed with the
following addition: Under the section of the meeting
discussing the sale of property at the Rauenhorst
Development, the Minutes should include the Committee
of the Whole voted 4-3 to sell. the property and earmark
the funds ,for future capital facilities or equipment.
Voting in favor was Trustee Arthur and voting against
were; Mayor Krause and Trustee Mur.auskis.
III. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY STREET LIGHTING_ PROGRAM
The Committee of the Whole reviewed documents from the
Department of Public Works indicating that the planned
street lighting improvements along Northwest Highway
from Waterman to Mount Prospect Road had now increased
in cost to more than $400,000 from the original estimate
of $266,000. Additionally, energy casts have escalated
from an earlier estimate of $5,250 to $8,300 annually.
The reason for this is the Illinois Department of
Transportation mandating that in order to use Motor Fuel
Tax Funds, the fight standards must be located approximately
100 feet apart rather than the initial design of 160 feet.
It is the State's position that the lighting system must
illuminate the entire roadway from sidewalk to curbline
and these additional lights are, therefore, necessary.
The Village staff indicated that in their opinion less
lighting would still accomplish the general. purpose
proposed by the Board and that in fact the lighting at
the new Maple Street Parking Lot is based on 130 foot
distances and at that distance, the entire Parking Lot
is well lit. After some general discussion, the Committee
of the Whole concluded that the administration should
make an effort on behalf of the Mayor and Board of
Trustees to have the Illinois Department of Transportation
reduce the spacing. If there is no movement on the
regulations on the part of the State, then the matter is
to be brought back to the Committee of the Whole for
further discussion. However, if the State will allow
the Village to locate the lights at either 160 foot
spacing or approximately 130 foot spacing, then the
matter can be directed to the Village Board for final
contract bidding. During this discussion, Trustee
Wattenberg asked that the administration notify the
Euclid Lake Homeowners Association, President Peter
Downing, the next time this matter appears on the Agenda
as they have some views about street lighting in general.
IVa MANAGER'S REPORT
The Village Manager reviewed for the Committee of
the Whole that the matter of ELECTRONIC GAMES is
scheduled for Committee discussion later in January.
Additionally, at that last meeting in January, the
administration plans to bring up for discussion the
proposed improvements along MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD including
notification to the residents along that roadway, The
Village Manager reported that the 1982-1983 BUDGET is
still on schedule having been reviewed by the Finance
Commission on Wednesday, January 6, After this initial
review, the Finance Commission asked for some additional
data regarding various matters and a subsequent meeting
is scheduled for Wednesday, January 20.
V. WELL #17
The Committee of the Whole reviewed reports from the
staff, our consulting engineer, Baxter and Woodman, and
Fletcher Engineering, The Village Manager reported that
after the initial repairs authorized by the Mayor and
the Board of Trustees earlier in 1981, the Well pump
stopped operating and after it was removed from the Well,
it was determined by staff and our consulting engineers
that the pump failed because of either manufacturer's
defect or the installer's error. The manufacturer,
Peerless Pump, the the installer, J. P, Miller have
offered to replace the bowl assembly together with a
contract for the removal. of sand at an expense not to
exceed $80,000. The staff and the consulting engineers
have found less expensive alternatives by using other
contractors and suppliers, The Village Manager indicated
that Fletcher Engineering was brought into the project
in order to obtain an independent opinion as to whether
or not Well #17 was really critical to the Village of
Mount Prospect water system. It was the conclusion of
Fletcher Engineering that we are not likely to receive
Lake water until 1985 and that even after Lake water,
Well #17 should be kept in reserve status for emergency
and supplemental pumping. Fletcher Engineering recommended
that the Village install stainless steel bowls and put
the Well on line as soon as possible. Baxter and Woodman
also concluded that the Well should be placed back on line
and repairs made. After some general discussion, the
Committee of the Whole concluded that the repairs should
be scheduled for a, subsequent Board Agenda for formal
authorization. Furthermore, the Village Manager was
authorized to inquire of the Village Attorney as to
whether or not we have any legal action against J. P.
Miller and/or. Peerless Pump.
VI. FACILITIES PLAN
Chief Pairitz, Task Force Chairman of the Facilities
Planning Committee, introduced members of the Committee
including Chief Pavlock, Mr. Weeks, George Busse, Robert
'McBride and Gregory Trepani. Chief Pairitz then reviewed
the procedure utilized by the Committee in assessing the
operational needs of the various departments. Village
Manager Burghard indicated that while this was not the
most opportune time to go to the market for long-term
debt, this was in his opinion the time that the Village
ought to be planning for its long-term needs so that it
might take benefit of lower interest rates in the future.
A general discussion of the report then ensued with some
members of the Committee suggesting that a tour of our
present facilities be established so that they could
update themselves on the operational needs of the various
departments. Trustee Arthur pointed out that in his
opinion, the administration could have included additional
alternatives such as outside storage of vehicles on some
municipally -owned property, the installation of a salt
storage shed on municipal property at Carboy Road, and
the use of Maple Street Parking Lot for employee parking.
Trustee Murauskis felt that the staff could better
utilize some of its existing spaces and indicated her'
reluctance together with that of Trustee Arthur of
approaching the taxpayer at this time for such sizable
expenditures. Mayor Krause indicated her reluctance to
proceed with any such expenditures at this time and also
expressed the opinion that existing facilities could better
- 3 -
be utilized, After some fUrthe,r general dis:cussion,
the adaiini ration was'cl6.rec:ted to arrange a tour of
e is,ting f cil.ities for those officials and citizens
whaa might be interested and that the matter should be
rescheduled for a Pasture Goixmitt e of the Whole meeting
for further evaluation and direction,
VII, ANY OTHER,BUSINE98,
Trustee Fsrl.ey inquired as to vhethet or not the
municipality; ought to be conside;riin a locaL Cable TV
C mmis:sion to, tbn for the operations of Cablenet and
for sponsor and coord?.nate tkha effor6s of local groups.
for local p ograrnmin . "he Village Manager Baas directed
to place this item on the Deferred Gist" and to bring
the matter up 'for d scaussion at a'futaare Committee of
the Whole meeting.
VI H. . ADJOURNMENT
The meeting, was a jqurned at 9:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
"pillage Mai nag�--r
TLB / rcr
4,