HomeMy WebLinkAbout3238_001MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JULY 27, 1982
I. ROLL CALL
Mayor Krause called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.,
in the Public Safety Building, 112 East Northwest
Highway. Present at the meeting were: Mayor Carolyn
Krause, Trustees Ralph Arthur, Gerald Farley, Leo Floros,
Edward Miller, Norma Murauskis and Theodore Wattenberg.
Also present at the meeting were: Village Manager
Terrance Burghard, Assistant Village Manager Jay Hedges,
Director of Code Enforcement Les Wuollett and approximately
ten persons in the audience.
II. MINUTES
The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of
July 13, 1982 were reviewed and filed.
III. LANDLORD/TENANT ORDINANCE
Mayor Krause reviewed for the Committee of the Whole steps
previously taken on the part of the Board to direct the
staff to develop an Ordinance to provide service to the
approximately 6,000 multi -family rental units in the
Village in the areas of dispute resolution, dwelling
unit responsibilities and licensing. The Mayor reiterated
that the Village has a growing concern about the declining
building standards in the multi -family areas, various
lease disputes and disputes about security deposits,
building repairs and seizures of personal property by
landlords. Assistant Manager Hedges reviewed the staff
activities to date in developing the first draft of such-
an
uchan Ordinance. After receiving the initial direction on
the part of the Committee of the Whole, the staff visited
Oak Park and Evanston to determine the practical
consequences of their landlord/tenant ordinances currently
in force. The draft Ordinance presented to the Committee
of the Whole was an initial draft still needing further
refinement by the staff, the Village attorney and input
from the elected officials as well as landlords and tenants.
Previous to developing the first draft, the staff invited
representatives from landlord and tenant interests to
assist in its development. Mr. Hedges indicated that if
the first draft is approved, in principle, by the Board
and after language refinements on the part of the attorney,
a second meeting will be conducted with landlord/tenant
interests and a second draft will be brought back,to
the Board sometime in September or October.
If approved in principle by the 3oard at that time,
the Village Manager's Office would then initiate the
necessary recruitment and training of staff to implement
the Ordinance on or about January 1, 1983. It is
anticipated at that time that one full-time inspector
would be hired and one part-time mediator would be
employed with their salaries and benefits payable from
licensing revenues assessed at the rate of $7.00 per
dwelling unit.
The Committee of the Whole then raised questions regarding
certain sections of the Ordinance including the absence
of a specific mediation step, the experience and costs
of other cities, the reasonableness and justification
for the fines proposed and application to senior citizens'
housing sites in the Village.
Members of the audience representing tenants and various
management companies provided comments in support and
against the proposal with specific questions raised about
the following:
A. How will the Village handle tenants that
change locks,on their units and, thus, prohibit
reasonable access by the landlord or the Village?
B. The Ordinance, as presently structured,
would eliminate standard leases and if the
language of the Ordinance is changed, the same
objectives can be achieved without unduly
burdening the real estate industry.
C. The cumulative limit on initial rent and
security deposit of one and one-half months is
unsatisfactory in those circumstances where
people do not move in on the first of the month.
D. The provision to return security deposits
within 21 days is contrary to State Statute
which requires 45 days.
E. The Village Ordinance would require apart-
ment management to be responsible for carpet
cleaning when, in fact, many of their policies
and leases make that the responsibility of the
tenant.
-2-
0
F. In health-related matters, particularly the
control of insects, the Ordinance is insufficiently
clear as to whether this is a tenant responsibility
or a landlord responsibility.
G. The Ordinance's ten-day notice for failure to
pay rent is contrary to State Statute which permits
a five-day notice.
H. Section VIII, 4, waives the rights of landlords
in favor of tenants to the disadvantage of the
real estate industry.
I. The language under the self-help section is
insufficient 'in defining material non-compliance
with landlord maintenance,
J. The language under the self-help section
regarding notice and reasonable cost needs further
specificity.
K. The penalty section is unclear as to whether
it includes tenants as well as landlords.
L. The tenant's right to terminate a lease after
a fire with three -days notice is insufficient and
a longer period may be necessary to cover occurrences
on weekends.
Three tenants in the audience indicated their support of
such an Ordinance claiming in some instances they have
been harassed by the landlord, not given copies of leases,
been forced to occupy units substantially different in
cleanliness and maintenance standards than the models
shown 'and not familiar with their rights and recourses
under the law.
Mr. George Klews, 604 South Elm, claiming that he was
neither a landlord nor a tenant, expressed his opinion
on philosophical grounds that the Village should not be
a party of private contracts, that the Ordinance is
heavily biased against landlords and that the Ordinance
is a serious threat to individual rights by allowing
the local government the authority to inspect private
dwelling units.
After some further general discussion, the staff was
instructed to proceed in its refinement of the Ordinance,
making necessary corrections for clarity in language and
conformance to applicable State Statutes. The staff was
also instructed to invite all interested parties to its
subsequent meeting in completing the next draft of the
Ordinance.
IV. SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT
Assistant Village Manager Hedges reviewed the Village
attorney's letter on the procedures necessary to formally
decide the question about the utilization of a Special
Service District to pay the capital costs associated
with the acquisition of Lake Michigan water. Mayor
Krause reviewed the direction previously given to the
staff to begin work on a Special Service District where-
by approximately 50% of the cost of the acquisition of
Lake water would be raised through a Special Service
District and the remaining 50% placed on the water bills.
ThJ._s division approximates the breakdown between capital
costs and operating costs. Mr. Hedges explained that
in order to proceed, we would need a rather lengthy and
accurate legal description of that part of the Village to
be included in the Special Service District so that
there is no taxation for the properties served by Citizens'
Utilities Company. The staff is seeking approval in
principle to spend up to $10,000 to have the necessary
work completed by outside agents. The Committee of the
Whole agreed and authorized the staff to proceed.
The Village Manager reported that the WELLER CREEK project
should be completed within two weeks exclusive of the
planting of trees which will be held off until this fall.
The Manager briefly reviewed the legal. opinion secured
by the Village in 1.980 demonstrating that there is NO
RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT for managers of liquor licenses when
such licenses are issued to corporations.
VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
$0or recornmended tbat the Village B d authori�ze
the i��*e:aditure of up 11 to Sy5'00 �P' join vitb� =1 �Northwest
�Municipal Conference in opposing an intervening in the
proposed Commonwealth Edison rate increase. If the irate
increase, as proposed by Commonwealth Edison and the
ICC staff is approved, ge can expect increases
of $100,000"$130,000. The Village currently spends
approximately $500,000 per year for such service and ittee
these in)breases amount to 20-25% annually. The Comm
of the Whole concurred and authorilzed the staff to notify
the Conference of the Village's willingness to participate.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:23 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
Village Manager
-4-
Village of MoLnt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Jay Hedges, Assistant Village Manager
FROM: T. P. Luehring, Director of Health Services
DATE: August 2, 1982
RE: Refuse Contract
The refuse pick-up for multi -unit dwellings is covered by
Ordinance and by our Contract with B.F.I. This was done
to assure pick-up and sanitary refuse containers, and to
try to obtain the best price through total # of unit
dwellings and by competitive bidding. The Village pays
B.F.I. $2.70 per unit per month, through July 1984 for
1 pick-up.
All multi -unit dwellings are required to have a minimum of
2 pick-ups per week. The second pick-up costs the owner
$2.90 per month per family unit .dwelling.
Pick-up
3
times
per
week
cost
$3.40
Pick-up
4
times
per
week
cost
$3.60
Pick-up
5
times
per
week
cost
$3.80
Pick-up
6
times
per
week
cost
$4.00
I spoke with Scott Axelson of B.F.I. and with Al Parks of Inland
Realty. Mr. Parks stated that B.F.I. is charging Inland $3.40
per unit per month for pick-up 3 times a week. Mr. Parks believes
he could get a cheaper rate if he could bid without being locked
into a Village Contract. ($6.10 per unit per month, however,
actual cost would be less due to refuse cost being partially subsidized)
Scott Axel son, stated that at Boxwood, Inland receive' -'twice- a week pick-up
and was billed $2.90 per unit per month.
Patrick Luehring, R.S.
TPL/mm
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: PLAN COMMISSION RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
DATE: AUGUST 5, 1982
The Plan Commission has completed its annual monitoring of the
Comprehensive Plan. The recommendation has been prepared by
the Subcommittee and passed on by the full Commission on
July 21, 1982.
As the changes do not require major alteration of the text,
the recommendations are in the form of an addendum to the Plan.
The Village Board should take these suggestions under consideration
for formal adoption.
KHF:hg
ADDENDA
TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ADOPTED ON APRIL 8, 1981, AND
UPDATED IN JUNE 1982
PLAIJIlING RESPONSIBILITY
Sec. 15.101 Official Comprehensive Plan and amended
by Ordinance 3089 of the Village of Mount Prospect:
The preparation of the Comprehensive Plan and coordination
of planning and development within Mount Prospect rests with
the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is estab-
lished under authority granted by Article VII of the Illinois
Constitution (concerning Home Rule, adopted 1970) and by
Chapter 24, Division 12, of the Illinois Municipal Code, which
reads:
The Planning Cwmmission is authorized (1) to prepare and
reco_-mmend to the future development or redevelopment of the
municipality. Such plan may be adopted in whole or inseparate
geographical or functional parts, each of which, when adopted,
shall be the official comprehensive plan, or part thereof, of
'the municipality. The Plan as recommended by the Planning -
Commission and as adopted -in any municipality in the state, may
be made applicable by the terms thereof, to land dituated within
the corporate limits and contiguous territory not more than one
and one-half miles beyond the corporate limits and not included
in any municipality. Such plan may be implemented by ordinances
(a) establishing reasonable standards.of design for subdivision
or resubdivision of unimproved land to redevelopment in respect
to public improvements and (c) may designate land suitable for
annexation for annexation to the municipality and the recommended
zoning classification for such land upon annexation. (2) To
recommend changes from time to time, in the official comprehensive
plan.. (3) To prepare and recommend to the corporate authorities
from time to time, plans for specific improvements in pursuance
of the official comprehensive plan. (4) To give aid to municipal
officials .. for improvements embraced within the official plan
...and to promote the realization of the official plan. .....
and as amended by Ordinance 3089 of the Village of Mount Prospect.
2 -
ADDENDA COMPFUIETISIVE PLAN 1982
Page 1 Introduction: 5th line Change 1980 to 1982
7th line - Change polulation to 52,634
Page 3 - 3rd Para: Add "Plan is to be updated annually by
a sub -committee of the Planning -Commission in
cooperation with the village Community- Development
staff."
Page 4 Goals Objectives No. 1: Question compatability with
recent ordinances.
Page 7 Transportation Objectives, No. 6: Correct to read
"Monitor and maintain" commuter parking.
Community facilities Objectives, No. 6: Add
"for other uses such as day care centers, pre-schools,
senior citizens and other facilities."
Page 8 Parks and Recreation Objectives, No. 4: "Continue
to utilize the" Commonwealth Edison ...
Page 20 1st complete -para: Add "These improvements have already
begun and should be continued."
3rd para: Add The rear portions of these properties
have already been improved and should-6ontinue to be
upgraded.
Last Para:-- Add "Building facades and _storefronts
improvements "already begun, should enhance the overall
appearance of the. area and continue being upgraded."
Page -21--2-2 Loans: The village is continuing to play a major
role in stimulating new development. It is already
creating preconditions to attract new private
investment
Transportation: The village is now developing plans
for mass transportation and traffic circulation.
lst complete para: The commercial rehabilitation
program is now being successfully implemented.
Page 28 Last para: Add "Feehanville drive should also be
considered as a major access road.
ADDENDA
Page 30
C014PREHENSIVE PLA'd 1982
3-
lst complete para: The Mount Prospect Park District
mow operates 27..parks sites.
Add: "The Commonwealth Edison easement on the southwest
side of the village is now maintained for recreation
purposes by the Mount Prospect Park District under a
lease agreement. The park district is also operating
recreationAl facilities on 14SD property on west Central
road. Known as Melas Park, the 70 -acre tract is operating
jointly with adjacent Arlington Heights Park District
on a 10 -year lease. To date 35 acres have been developed for
recreation.
Page 36 Last para: Gregory School:This property has been
purchased by Christian Life Church, which will also
maintain the grounds with the exception of a ball
diamon2l to be maintained by the Mount Prospect Park
District.
Page 39 Public Uorks: This department now maintains a staff
of 55 full time employees, 27 part time employees
(including part time), and an engineering staff of 8
personnel.
Page 40
Public Library: The Mount -Prospect Public Library
whose service area is coterminous with village
boundaries, has been a tax supported institution since
1943. The present facility, was built in 1976.
Operation and administration of the library is governed
by, - a seven -member board of -elected officials.
Currently 135,031 volumes are maintained in the Mount
Prospect Public Library. The American Library
Association's minimum recommended standard is 3.5
volumes per 1,000 population. The deficiendy in
numbers of volumes per capita will -be eliminated as
_ _: addifional funds--are.available.
In addition to providing traditional library services,
it also provides audio-visual software and hardware.
adult education progra:gs, tours, bus..trips and feature
length films for adults and children, talking books
for the blind and physically handicapped, a TTY for the
hearing. impaired, consumer education information, and
reading roan facilities.
(Editor's Note : )This may be inserted in its entirety,
or copy corrected to show that 135,031 volumes are
presently in the library shelves.)
ADDENDA COMPREHENSIVE PLAAI 1982 -4
a
a
Page 41 The village has now joined neighboring communities
in contracting for the purchase of Lake Michigan
water from Chicago. A second source of water from
Evanston was not accepted.
Page 42
Page 45
Street Lighting: The village has contracted for
installation of high density street lighting along
Northwest Highway within the viI2.&ge.1 corp_nr_ate limits.
Zoning Ordinances 9 Para.: Add "1982" Comprehensive
Plan.
Para. 1: The clearinghouse recommended by this
paragraph is now being implemented.
2nd Para.: The Community Block Grant program has
been implimented and is in service.
Para. 7: The program to encourage repairs and
continued maintenance has been initiated and is
1 operating effectively.
Page 46 Housing: Community block grant funds to aid low and
moderate income families in housing maintenance is
now in effect.
2nd Para.: The low interest rehabilitation loan
program is now available to merchants.
Commercial Development - Downtown: The Busse Wille
improvement program has been completed, becoming a
major asset to the village's downtown area.
Page 53 Area 1, Parcel F: Correct land parcel: Located at
Kensington and Des Plaines River Road.
Page 55 Parcel 0: See page 36, last paragraph - Gregory
School
Respectfully submitted
Planning Commission Sub -committee
on Comprehensive Plan
Tom Borrelli
Dee Corr
Louis Velasco
Marie Caylor, Chairman
'tial Ross, Ex -Officio