Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3128_0010 MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AUGUST 26, 1997 I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Present at the meeting were: Trustees George Clowes, Timothy Corcoran, Richard Lohrstorfer, Daniel Nocchi and Irvana Wilks. Absent from the meeting was Trustee Paul Hoefert. Staff present included Village Manager Michael Janonis, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl, Community Development Director William Cooney, Deputy Community Development Director Michael Blue, Building Coordinator Brad Paulson and Cable Production Coordinator Ross Rowe. II. MINUTES Approval of Minutes of August 12, 1997. Motion made by Trustee Corcoran and Seconded by Trustee Nocchi to approve the Minutes. Minutes were approved unanimously. Trustee Wilks abstained. John Korn, 301 North William, spoke. He requested the Village Board reconsider the notification process given to residents within the normal 250' radius of property considered for rezoning. He suggested the change be made so that at least some residents would be notified of a pending Zoning change regardless of what the distance from the property under consideration is to ensure that at least an impacted resident may be made aware of the proposal. He also felt that there was some disruption during the meeting the previous week due to numerous inconsiderate audience members taking and receiving cellular phone calls and other communications. Norm Kurtz, Chairman of the Economic Development Commission, spoke. He is representing the EDC, the Plan Commission and the Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission. All three groups have drafted a joint memorandum to the Village Board requesting the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee to provide an action plan for presentation to the Village Board. General comments of the Village Board members included the following items: Some Board members felt that such a Committee would be a continuation of the process of downtown redevelopment discussions. Some Board members also wanted to ensure that the process was not slowed down by the establishment of this Committee. There was a request to consider appointing two business owners from Mount Prospect to the Committee. There was some discussion as to the added value of a marketing consultant and what they would bring to the process. Some Board members also recommended property owners from the downtown area be included in the Committee. A suggestion was made to consider a separate meeting with downtown property owners before the general open house is scheduled highlighting the recommendations of the Commission. Other Board members suggested fresh faces be considered for the group so that some new ideas are brought in including newer Trustees. Community Development Director Bill Cooney responded to a number of the comments. He stated that it is important to include a market survey to determine how conditions have changed to ensure that all necessary efforts are directed toward the proper market. Norm Kurtz, spoke. He stated that he has received a number of inquiries from business owners and residents who are interested in participating. He also reminded the Board that there were a number of residents which were involved in the process when the Pontarelli project started. He stated that it is his intention and the group's intention to meet at least twice per month until January 1998 in order to prepare the recommendations to the Village Board. Hal Predovich, Chair of the BDDRC, spoke. He stated that he has also been contacted by numerous volunteers wanting to participate and there is a large amount of interest in getting the process moving. General consensus of the Village Board members was to establish the Ad Hoc Committee to recommend downtown redevelopment action plan and proceed with appointments from the Mayor as soon as possible. 111 00) 914112et Community Development Director Bill Cooney stated that this proposal before the Board this evening is to update existing Codes to meet current construction techniques and improvements. He is requesting the Village Board consider adopting the 1996 version of the BOCA with local amendments and updates. He stated the Village is currently operating under the 1990 version of the BOCA Code. Staff typically requests an update of BOCA every three years so the Code does not become too outdated'. He stated that the EDC and Chamber have reviewed the proposal and have voted unanimously to support this change. 0 I Building Coordinator Brad Paulson provided a general overview of the changes requested. He stated that Code revisions are done on a national basis based on construction techniques and changes or improvements in construction processes. He said local amendments typically are local requirements which reflect community standards. He stated that one of the other reasons to consider a change at this time is that the Insurance Services Organization (ISO) is in the process of reviewing Building Departments throughout the nation in order to include a rating as part of the typical ISO rating which currently includes Fire Department and water service capabilities. He stated an extensive staff review has taken place to ensure that all redundant areas have been removed along with overly technical language. He stated Fire Codes have been changed to allow more flexibility of choice for the owner so that they can make an economic decision that still meets the intent of the Code. Adelaide and Fred Thulin, local business owners, spoke. They support the change in the Codes as presented. Building Coordinator Brad Paulson responded to a question regarding living below ground or in the basement. He stated the conditions which allow such an option have been changed so that persons can live below ground so long as an escape window or a secondary means of egress is in place with the hard -wired smoke detectors as required by Code. General comments by the Village Board included the following items: There were questions regarding how residents are informed of the Codes and how applications are provided in non-technical language for completion. There was also a discussion concerning the Permit Fee policy. There was also a discussion regarding the inclusion of the model Soundproofing Ordinance for new construction and the inclusion of this model,Ordinance in the general Code. Trustees asked why some standards had been reduced from the previous requirements and a discussion ensued regarding the consistency of these changes. Brad Paulson responded to a number of these comments. He stated that the Permit Fees have not changed since 1984 and the discussion regarding the fees will undoubtedly be brought up in the near future. He stated by comparison Mount Prospect is quite low in terms of the fees charged. He stated that staff is also looking at simplifying the process for reviews any way possible. General consensus of the Village Board was to move forward with the 1996 BOCA Code with local amendments and present the appropriate Ordinance at a future Board meeting for final determination. VI. CABLE UPDATE Assistant Village Manager Dave Strahl provided a general overview of the negotiations' progress to date regarding the details of the change in channel location for Mount Prospect Government Access Television. Trustees requested consideration of adding a ghost logo in the lower corner of the programs similar to other broadcast stations. There was also discussion as to progress to date in terms of informing the viewing public. Cable Production Coordinator Ross Rowe presented the new logo to the Board for their information. VII. MANAGER'S REPORT None. VIII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS None. IX. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8:54 p.m. DS/rcc Respectfully submitted, C DAVID STRAHL Assistant Village Manager Il TABLE •F CONTEINTA 1. Executive Summary 2. Model Municipal Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee Ordinance 3. Drafter's Notes for Model Ordinance 4. Model Form for Franchise Fee Waiver (90 Day Notice Form) 5. Model Form for Notice of Imposition of Infrastructure Maintenance Fee 6. Model Telecommunications Provider Registration Form EC ARS In enacting Public Act No. 90-154, the Illinois, General Assembly has made a major change in the traditional methods used by municipalities to control the use of public streets and other rights-of-way by telecommunications companies. Effective January 1, 1998, Public Act 90-154 (also known as House Bill 1147) substantially eliminates the ability of municipalities to require telecommunications retailers to enter into franchise or license agreements and to pay negotiated fees for the use of public streets and rights -of - ways. Rather, the Act has three stated purposes: • "abolish municipal franchise fees with respect to telecommunications retailers," • "create a uniform system for the collection and distribution of fees associated with the privilege of use of the public right of way for telecommunications activity," and • "provide municipalities a comprehensive method of compensation for telecommunications activity including the recovery of reasonable costs of regulating the use of the public rights-of-way for telecommunications activity. " (HB 1147, Section 5). 1 In order to recover a municipality's costs of regulating the telecommunications retailers' use of public streets and rights-of-way, the municipality may impose a "municipal telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fee" (with the bulky acronym "MTIMF") at a rate of up to one percent (1 %) of gross revenues of the telecommunications retailers. This package of materials contains models of several of the documents that municipalities will need in order to irnpose the MTIMF. It was prepared by the Telecommunications Subcommittee of the IML's Home Rule Attorneys' Committee, and has been designed for use by both home rule and non -home rule municipalities. The Northwest Municipal Conference and the DuPage Mayors and Managers Conference also had representatives on this subcommittee. The subcommittee received input from AT & T; Ameritech , and MCI, whose representatives participated in the last two working sessions of the drafting process. While the MTIMF is the first part of the implementation of Public Act 90-154, municipalities should be aware of the second part of the implementation process. All municipalities will steed to adept regulations for the management and control of public streets and rights-of-way that will regulate all telecommunications retailers on an equal basis, The Telecommunications Subcommittee will continue its work on this phase of the implementation process and hopes to make a recommendation later this year. It is likely that the model telecommunications ordinance (MTO) enacted by some municipalities will need to be modified or repealed during the second phase of the implementation process in order t o comply with Public Act 90-154. Those communities that have enacted the MTO should seek the advice of their legal counsel regarding any action concerning that ordinance. It is important to bear in mind that Public Act 90-154 is not effective until January 1, 1998, and municipalities may wish to avoid creating any period in which they are without any regulations in place. od l Qrdivan e: The MTIMF must be imposed by an ordinance enacted by the corporate authorities of the municipality. This model has been created to address the issues that might. arise in the implementation of the MTIMF and has been prepared in a format to allow easy incorporation into a municipality's local municipal code. Prior to adoption, it should be reviewed by each municipality's legal 'counsel for any necessary customizing to address particular needs and concerns of that municipality. The model ordinance will be available in electrpnic form, either on diskette or the IML's web site (www.iml.org). 12rafterls NQtg: To assist local legal counsel in the preparation of a suitable form of the model ordinance for adoption in each municipality, the Telecommunications Subcommittee prepared these Drafter's Notes as a guide to some of the legal issues that may be raised in connection with the preparation and adoption of the model ordinance. odel orrn for rand ise ee giver a-njlce F rpn_ . In order to begin imposing the MTIMF, the municipality must notify the telecommunications retailers with which it has a valid franchise or license agreement that the MTIMF is being imposed and that all fees and other compensation under that agreement have been waived. This waiver and notice must be sent by each municipality at least 90 days prior to imposing the MTIMF. This model form provides guidance in preparing a customized form for each municipality. N o F rrn for Ngtice of Imuosition of Infrastructure Main guge Fe To ensure that the maximum number of telecommunications retailers are aware of the municipality's imposition of the MTIMF so that they can promptly begin collecting it, notice should be given to as many telecommunications retailers as possible as early as possible. The model notice form was prepared to serve as a guide for the proper contents of such a notice. The IML is planning on providing a method of group notice to telecommunications providers regarding MTIMF ordinance enactment by its member municipalities. If you would like to be included in this group mailing, notification to the IML along with a certified copy of your ordinance is required by November 12, 1997. Lists of telecommunications providers obtained from the Illinois Commerce Commission are available from the IML for those municipalities that desire to provide their own notice. However, these lists are quite lengthy, thus municipalities may find that participation in the League's group notice would be advantageous to them. Model, ' ation i er RegistrationForm: To enable municipalities to know who is acting as a telecommunications retailer or as a telecommunications provider (such as a wholesaler that sells excess line capacity to telecommunications retailers) and who may be located in public streets and rights-of- way, the model ordinance requires these entities to do a one-time registration with the municipality. This registration must be updated from time to time as the registration information changes. The model registration form is intended as an example that would obtain the relevant information. The IML thanks the following individuals for their invaluable assistance in the preparation of these materials. Barbara Meyer, Corporation Counsel Village of Skokie Michael Roth, City Attorney City of Naperville David Wiltse, City Attorney City of Des Plaines Mark Balkin, Attorney Ancel, Glink, Diamond, Cope & Bush, P.C. Timothy Frenzer, Corporation Counsel Village of Wilmette Nick Greifer, Policy Analyst Northwest Municipal Conference Timothy Fluck, Policy Analyst Mark Baloga, Legislative Liaison DuPage Mayors and Managers Conference Barbara Adams, Attorney Burke, Weaver & Prell William Luking, Legislative Counsel City of Chicago Christopher Torem, Asst. Corp. Counsel City of Chicago Jeffrey Randall, Attorney Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd. Paul Keller, City Attorney City of Park Ridge Beth Anne Janicki, Chief Legal Counsel Illinois Municipal League 3 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE MODEL MUNICIPAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE FEE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE VILLAGE [CITY] OF BY THE ADDITION OF [ARTICLE/CHAPTER] IMPOSING A MUNICIPAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE FEE WHEREAS, the Village [City] of (the "Village") [(the "City")] is a [home - rule] municipality in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and WHEREAS, the Village [City] has the, authority to adopt ordinances and to promulgate rules and regulations [that pertain to its government and affairs and] that protect the public health, safety and welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, [in addition to the Village [City]'s power as a home -rule municipality,] this Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the provisions of the Illinois Telecommunications Municipal Infrastructure Maintenance Fee Act, Public Act 90-154 (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the fees imposed under this Ordinance will replace the Village [City]'s existing municipal franchise fees.with respect to telecommunications retailers, which are currently paid by the telecommunications consumer, with a different fee under the Act; and WHEREAS, this Ordinance is intended to create a uniform system for the collection of fees associated with the privilege of using Village [City] rights-of-way and other public rights-of-way for telecommunications activity within the municipal boundaries of the Village [City], including the recovery of reasonable costs for regulating the use of all public rights-of-way within its municipal boundaries for telecommunications activity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of * [City Council of -] as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The facts and statements contained. in the preamble to this Ordinance are found to be true and correct and are hereby adopted as part of this Ordinance. Section 2. Adoption of Fee. Chapter _ of the Municipal Code of the Village [City] of shall be amended by the addition of [Article/Chapter] _ that will read as follows: G-3020-2 JMR 09/10/97 ARTICLE [CHAPTER] Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee . A Definitions. As used in this [Article/Chapter], the following terms shall have the following meanings: (a) "Gross Charges" means the amount paid to a telecommunications retailer for the act or privilege of originating or receiving telecommunications within the Village [City], and for all services rendered in connection therewith, valued in money whether paid in money or otherwise, including cash, credits, services, and property of every kind or nature, and shall be determined. without any deduction on account of the cost of such telecommunications, the cost of the materials used, labor or service costs, or any other expense whatsoever. In case credit is extended, the amount thereof shall be included only as and when paid. "Gross charges" for private line service shall include charges imposed at each channel point within the Village [City], charges for the channel mileage between each channel point within the Village [City], and charges for that portion of the interstate inter-offic6 channel provided within the Village [City]. However, "gross charges" shall not include: (1) any amounts added to a purchaser's bill because of a charge made under: (i) the fee imposed by this Section, (ii) additional charges added to a purchaser's bill under Section 9-221 or 9-222 of the Public Utilities Act., (iii) amounts collected. under Section S- 11-17 of the Illinois Municipal Code, (iv) the tax imposed by the Telecommunications Excise Tax Act, (v) 911 surcharges, or (vi) the tax imposed by Section 4251 of the Internal Revenue Code;' [City]; (2) charges for a sent collect telecommunication received outside the Village (3) charges for leased time on equipment or charges for the storage of data or information or subsequent retrieval or the processing of data or information intended to change its form or content. Such equipment includes, but is not limited to, the use of calculators, computers, data processing equipment;, tabulating equipment, or accounting equipment and also includes the usage of computers under a tinge -sharing agreement; (4) charges for customer equipment, including such equipment that is leased or rented by the customer from any source, wherein such charges are disaggregated and separately identified from other charges; () charges to business enterprises certified under Section 9-222.1 of the Public Utilities Act to the extent of such exemption and during the period of time specified by the Village [City]; •) charges for telecommunications and all services and equipment connectionparent corporationowned subsidia ries or between wholly owned subsidiaries,only to the extent that the charges between the G-3020-2 1MR 09/10/97 -2- parent corporation and wholly owned subsidiaries or between wholly owned subsidiaries represent expense allocation between the corporations and not the generation of profit other than a regulatory required profit for the corporation rendering such services; (7) bad debts ("bad debt" means any portion of a debt that is related to a sale at retail for which gross charges are not otherwise deductible or excludable that has become worthless or uncollectible, as determined under applicable federal income tax standards; if the portion of the debt deemed to be bad is subsequently paid, the retailer shall report and pay the tax on that portion during the reporting period in which the payment is made); (8) charges paid by inserting coins in coin-operated telecommunications devices; or (9) charges for telecommunications and all services and equipment provided to the Village [City]. (b) "Public Right -of -Way" means any municipal street, alley, water or public right-of- way dedicated or commonly used for utility purposes, including utility easements wherein the Village [City] has acquired the right and authority to locate or permit the location of utilities consistent with telecommunications facilities. "Public Right -of -Way" shall not include any real or personal Village [City] property that is not specifically described in the previous sentence and shall not include Village [City] buildings and other structures or improvements, regardless of whether they are situated in the public right-of-way. (c) "Retailer maintaining a place of business in this State"; or any like term, means and includes any retailer having or maintaining within the State of Illinois, directly or by a subsidiary, an office, distribution facilities, transmission facilities, sales office, warehouse, or other place of business, or any agent or other representative operating within this State under the authority of the retailer or its subsidiary, irrespective of whether such place of business or agent or other representative is located here permanently or temporarily, or whether such retailer or subsidiary is licensed to do business in this State. (d) "Sale of telecommunications at retail" means the transmitting, supplying, or furnishing of telecommunications and all services rendered in connection therewith for a consideration, other than between a parent corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries or between wholly owned subsidiaries, when the gross charge made by one such corporation to another such corporation is not greater than the gross charge paid to the retailer for their use or consumption and not for sale. (e) "Service address" means the location of telecommunications equipment from which telecommunications services are originated or at which telecommunications services are received. If this is not a defined location, as in the case of wireless telecommunications, paging systems, maritime systems, air -to -ground systems, and the like, "service address" shall mean the location of the customer's primary use of the telecommunications equipment as defined by the location in Illinois where bills are sent. c3020-2 ,MR 09/1M7 -3- "Telecommunications" includes, but is not limited to, messages or information transmitted through use of local, toll, and wide area telephone service, channel services, telegraph services, teletypewriter service, computer exchange services, private line services, speciali7xd mobile radio services, or any other transinission of messages or information by electronic or similar means, between or among points by wire, cable, fiber optics, laser, microwave, radio, satellite, or similar facilities. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, "telecommunications" shall also include wireless telecommunications as hereinafter defined. "Telecommunications" shall not include value added services in which computer processing applications are used to act on the form, content, code, and protocol of the infori-nation for purposes other than transmission. "Telecommunications" shall not include purchase of telecommunications by a telecommunications service provider for use as a component part of the service provided by him or her to the ultimate retail consumer who originates or terminates the end-to-end communications. Retailer access charges, right of access charges, charges for use of intercompany facilities, and all telecommunications resold in the subsequent provision and used as a component of, or integrated into, end-to-end telecorrununications service shall not be included in gross charges as sales for resale. "Telecommunications" shall not include the provision of cable services through a cable system as defined in the Cable Communications Act of 1984 (47 U.S.C. Sections 521 and following) as now or hereafter amended or cable or other programming services subject to an open video system fee payable to the Village (City] through an open video system as defined in, the Rules of the Federal Communications Commission (47 C.D.F. 76.1 t and following) as now or hereafter amended. (g) "Telecommunications provider" means (1) any telecommunications retailer; and (2) any person that is not a telecommunications retailer that installs, owns, operates or controls equipment in the. public right-of-way that is used or designed to be used to transmit telecommunications in any form. (h) "Telecommunications retailer" or `retailer" or "carrier" means and includes every person engaged in the business of making sales of telecommunications at retail as defined in this Section. The Village [City] may, in its discretion, upon application, authorize the collection of the fee hereby imposed by any retailer not maintaining a place of business within this State, who, to the satisfaction of the Village (City], furnishes adequate security to ensure collection and payment of the fee. When so authorized, it shall be the duty of such retailer to pay the fee upon all of the gross charges for telecommunications in the same manner and subject to the same requirements as a retailer maintaining a place of business within the Village [City]. (i) "Wireless telecommunications" includes cellular mobile telephone services, personal wireless services as defined in Section 704(C) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Public Law No. 104-104), 42 U.S.C. §332(c)(7), as now or hereafter amended, including all commercial mobile radio services, and paging services. 2 Registration of telecommunications providers. (a) Every telecornmunications provider as defined by this [Article/Cliapter) shall register with the Village [City] within 30 days after the effective date of this (Article/Chapter] or becoming G-3020-2 JMR 09/1 ON7 -4- a telecommunications provider, whichever is later, on a form to be provided by the Village [City], provided, however, that any telecommunications retailer that has filed a return pursuant to .4(c) of this [Article/Chapter] shall be deemed to have registered in accordance with this Section. (b) Every telecommunications provider who has registered with the Village [City] pursuant to .2 (a) has an affirmative duty to submit an amended registration form or current return as required by .4(c), as the case may be, to the Village [City] within 30 days from the date of the occurrence of any changes in the information provided by the telecommunications provider in the registration form or most recent return on file with the Village [City]. .3 Municipal telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fee. (a) A Village [City] telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fee is hereby imposed upon all telecommunications retailers in the amount of [1.0%'] of all gross charges charged by the telecommunications retailer to service addresses within the Village [City] for telecommunications originating or received in the Village [City]. (b) Upon the effective date of the'infrastructure maintenance fee authorized in this [Article/Chapter], the Village [City] infrastructure maintenance fee authorized hereunder shall be the only fee or compensation for the use of all public rights-of-way within the Village [City] by telecommunications retailers. Imposition of the infrastructure maintenance fee provided under this [Article/Chapter] does not, however, serve as a limitation on the levying of any taxes or imposition of any fees otherwise authorized by law. (c) The Village [City] telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fee authorized by this Section shall be collected, enforced, and administered as set forth in Section .4 of this [Article\Chapter]. .4 Collection, enforcement, and administration of telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fees. (a) A telecommunications retailer shall charge to and collect from each customer an additional charge in an amount equal to the Village [City] infrastructure maintenance fee attributable to that customer's service address. (b) Unless otherwise approved by the Village [City] [Manager/Administrator] the infrastructure maintenance fee shall be remitted by the telecommunications retailer to the Village [City] not later than the last day of the month subsequent to the month in which a bill is issued to the customer; provided, however, that the telecommunications retailer may retain an amount not to exceed 2% of the Village [City] infrastructure maintenance fee collected by it to reimburse itself for expenses incurred in accounting for and remitting the fee. 'Fee may be imposed in quarter percent increments of not more than 1.0% G-3020.2 IMR 09/10/97 -�- (c) 1 enrittance of the municipal infirastructure fee to the Village [City] shall be acGompanied by a retum, in a fonn to be prescribed by the Village [City] [Manager/Administrator], which shall contain such infonnation as the Village [City] [Manager/Administrator] may reasonably require. (d) Any infrastructure maintenance fee required to be collected pursuant to this [Article/Chapter] and any such infrastructure maintenance fee collected by such telecommunications retailer shall constitute a debt owed by the telecommunications retailer to the Village [City]. The charge imposed under A(a) by the telecommunications retailer pursuant to this [ icle/Chapter] shall constitute a debt of the purchaser to the telecommunications retailer who provides such services until paid and, if unpaid, is recoverable at law in the same manner as the original charge for such services. (e) If it shall appeal, that an amount of infrastructure maintenance fee las been paid that was not due under the provisions of this [Article/Chapter], whether as a result of a mistake of fact or an error of law, then such amount shall be credited against any infrastructure maintenance fee due, or to become due, under this [Article/Chapter], from the telecommunications retailer who made the erroneous payment; provided, however, the Village [City] [Manager/Adninistrator] may request, and telecommunications retailer shall provide, written substantiation for such credit. However, no claim for such credit may be made more than three years after the date of the erroneous payment unless, (1) the credit is used only to offset a claim of underpayment made by the Village [City] within the applicable statutory period of limitations, and (2) the credit derives from, an overpayment made by the same telecommunications retailer during the applicable statutory period of limitations (fl Amounts paid under this [ icle/Clrapter] by telecommunications retailers shall not be included in the tax, base under any of the following acts as described immediately below: (1) "gross charges" for purposes of the Telecommunications Excise Tax Act; (2) "gross receipts" for purposes of the municipal utility tax as prescribed in Section 8-11-2 of the Illinois Municipal Code; (3) "gross charges" for purposes of the municipal telecommunications tax as prescribed in Section 8-11-17 of the Illinois Municipal Code; (4) "gross revenue" for purposes of the tax on annual gross revenue of public utilities prescribed in Section 2-2012 of the Public Utilities Act. (g) The Village [City] shall have the right, in its discretion, to audit the books and records 'ofall telecommunications retailers subject to this [Article/Chapter] to determine whether the telecommunications retailer has properly accounted to the Village [City] for the Village [City] infrastructure maintenance fee. Any underpayment of the amount of the Village [City] infrastructure maintenance fee due to the Village [City] by the telecommunications retailer shall be paid to the G-3020-2 JMR 09,10/97 -6- Village [City] plus five (5%) percent of the total amount of the underpayment determined in an audit, plus any costs incurred by the Village [City] in conducting the audit, in an amount not to exceed five (5%) percent of the total amount of the underpayment determined in an audit. Said sum shall be paid to the Village [City] within twenty-one (21) days after the date of issuance of an invoice for same. (h) The Village [City] [Manager/Administrator], or his or her designee, may promulgate such further or additional regulations concerning the administration and enforcement of this [Article/Chapter], consistent with its provisions, as may be required from time to time and shall notify all telecommunications retailers that are registered pursuant to _.2 of this [Article/Chapter] of such regulations. .5 Compliance With Other Laws. Nothing in this [Article/Chapter] shall excuse any person or entity from obligations imposed under any law, including but not limited to: (a) generally applicable taxes; and (b) standards for construction on, over, under, or within, use of or repair of the public rights-of-way, including standards relating to free standing towers and other structures upon the public rights-of-way, as provided; and (c) any liability imposed for the failure to comply with such generally applicable taxes or standards governing construction on, over, under, or within, use of or repair of the public rights- of-way; and (d) compliance with any ordinance or provision of this Code concerning uses or structures not located on, over, or within the right-of-way. .6 Existing Franchises and Licenses. Any franchise, license, or similar agreements between telecommunications retailers and the Village [City] entered into before the effective date of this [Article/Chapter] regarding the use of public rights-of-way shall remain valid according to and for their stated terms except for any fees, charges or other compensation to the extent waived. .7 Penalties. Any telecommunications provider who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with any of the provisions of this [Article/Chapter] shall be subject to fine in accordance with the general penalty provisions of the Village [City] Municipal Code. .8 Enforcement. Nothing in this [Article/Chapter] shall be construed as limiting any additional or further remedies that the Village [City] may have for enforcement of this [Article/Chapter]. . .9 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this [Article/Chapter] is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. .10 Conflict. This [Article/Chapter] supersedes all [Article/Chapter]s or parts of [Article/Chapter]s adopted prior hereto which are in conflict herewith, to the extent of such conflict. ?T20.2_ -7- . Section 3. Waiver and Fee Implementation. (a) The Village [City] hereby waives all fees, charges, and other compensation that may accrue, after the effective date of the waiver, to the Village [City] by a telecommunications retailer pursuant to any existing Village [City] franchise, license, or similar agreement with a telecommunications retailer during the time the Village [City] imposes the Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee. This waiver shall only be effective during the time the hitrastructure Maintenance Fee provided for in this Ordinance is subject to being lawfully imposed on the teleco iunications retailer and collected by the telecommunications retailer from the customer. (b) The Village [City] Clerk shall send a notice of the waiver by certified maiUreturn receipt requested to each telecommunications retailer with whom the Village [City] has a franchise. (c) The Village [City] infrastructure maintenance fee provided for in this Ordinance shall become effective and imposed on the first dray of the month not less than ninety (90) days after the Village [City] provides written notice by certified mail to each teleconunun.ications retailer with whom the Village [City] has an existing franchise, license„ or similar agreement that the Village [City] waives all compensation under such existing franchise, license, or similar agreement during such time as the fee is subject to being lawfully imposed and collected by the retailer and remitted to the Village [City]. The infrastructure maintenance fee shall apply to gross charges billed on or after the effective date as established in the preceding sentence. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form. ADOPTED this day of , 1997, pursuant to a roll call vote as follows: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTENTION: APPROVED by me this ATTESTED, Filed in my office, and published in pamphlet form this day of , 1997. Clerk of the Village [City] of County, Illinois. G-3020-2 JMR 09/10/97 day of , 1997, , President [Mayor] of the Village [City] of - County, Illinois In DRAFTER'S NOTES SECTION NOTES Title The Model Ordinance is designed to be adopted as an article or chapter of a municipality's code. If the municipality has not codified its ordinances, it should substitute "Ordinance" for "Article" or "Chapter" when those terms appear. First 3 The Drafting Committee prepared the Model Ordinance so that both home "Whereas" Clauses rule and non -home rule municipalities may adopt it. Home rule of the Preamble municipalities may add the relevant bracketed language that appears in these "Whereas" clauses. 4th & 5th The MTIMF imposed by the Model Ordinance exp agg franchise fees and "Whereas Clause permit fees paid by telecommunications retailers. The MTIMF is intended to the of Preamble to compensate the municipality for (a) the value of the local public rights-of- way used by these retailers and (b) the costs of regulating that use. Even if the telecommunications retailer is not using the right-of-way, it is still subject to the MTIlVIF if it is otherwise serving customers within the community. 2 If a municipality adopts the Model Ordinance and has not codified its ordinances, this section will need to be redrafted. .I DEFINITIONS "Gross charges" are the base against which the MTIMF rate is applied to determine the amount of the fee that a telecommunications retailer is to pay. This mirrors the definition of gross charges found in Section 10(a) of Public Act 90-154. _.1(b) "Public right-of-way" is defined in order to specify those locations in or upon which a telecommunications retailer who has paid a municipality's MTRVIF is entitled to locate telecommunications facilities. The definition's specific inclusion of "municipal street, alley ... and public rights-of-way dedicated or commonly used for utility purposes" also operates to exclude certain other rights-of-way (such as driveways, bike paths, and park trails) that are not "dedicated or commonly used for utility purposes." The specific inclusion of "utility easements wherein the Village [City] has acquired the right and authority to locate or permit the location of utilities consistent with telecommunications facilities" also operates to exclude those utility easements which are not "consistent with telecommunications facilities." The specific inclusion of "water" should be interpreted to mean "bodies of water" (such as lakes and rivers), not water in public water and sewer lines and storage facilities. Payinent of a municipality's MTIMF does not entitle telecommunications retailers (nor other providers) to use n -right-of-way municipal property (such as buildings, structures such as water towers, municipal utility poles and conduits even if located in a right-of-way, and municipally owned parcels of land used for municipal buildings and parks). A municipality typically will negotiate a lease to authorize the use of this non -right-of-way property. _.1(c) The definition of "Retailer maintaining a place of business in this State" (taken from Section 10(e) of Public Act 90-154) is intended to allow retailers who do not maintain a place of business within Illinois an opportunity to avail themselves of the protections of Public Act 90-154 (i.e., use of right-of- way) by agreeing to pay the MTIMY. See the notes and definition for section _.1(h). _.1(d) The definition of "Sale of telecommunications at retail" (taken from Section 10(f) of Public Act 90-154) is intended to distinguish those providers of telecommunications services who are not required to pay the municipal MTIMF (i.e., those who are not retailers; see notes and definition for sections _.1(g) & (h)). This also means that these non -retailers are not entitled by Public Act 90-154 to use the municipality"s rights-of-way. _.1(e) The definition of "Service address" (taken from Section 10(g) of Public Act 90-154) specifies which municipalities are entitled to impose an MTUVIF on each individual provision of telecommunications services to a customer. Note that the customer's billing address is the service address for wireless telecommunications. _•1( The definition of "Telecommunications" (taken from Section 10(b) of Public Act 90-154) is intended to help specify who must pay the MTIMF and who (by paying the MTIlVIF) is entitled to use municipal rights-of-way to locate facilities. The definition specifically ilacludes "wireless telecomm "cations" and excludes cable T" services (see notes and definitions for section. _.l (i)). In general, the definition does not make exclusions based on the types of information being transmitted, the type of facilities used to transmit information, or the types of electronic or similar technologies used to make transmissions. However, the definition does specifically exclude: (a) services that process information (and do not merely transmit it), (b) component services that are part of the telecommunications services ultimately provided to the retail consumer, (c) other types of special access charges, fees for use of intercompany facilities, and services resold or integrated into telecommunications services, and 2 (d) cable or other programming services provided through a cable or open video system authorized under federal law. _.1(g) The definition of "Telecommunications provider" is intended to specify those types of persons who must register under Model Ordinance section .2. This definition is broader than telecommunications retailer and is intended to cover those entities that own telecommunications equipment located in the right-of-way but do not sell telecommunications at retail. .1(h) The definition of "Telecommunications retailer" (taken from Section 10(d) of Public Act 90-154) is intended to specify which providers of telecommunications services must pay the MTIMF. Those who do not provide "telecommunications services at retail" are not required to pay the MTHviF. This definition is based on the definitions of "sale of telecommunications atretail" (see section_.1(d)), "telecommunications" (see section _.1(f)), and "wireless telecommunications" (see section .1(i)). Also see the notes and definition for "Retailer maintaining a place of business in this State" (section _.1(c)). 1(i) Telecommunications retailers who provide "wireless telecommunications" must also pay the MTHVIF imposed by a municipality, despite the fact that the provider does not have facilities located in the municipality's rights- of-way. The definition includes only certain specific types of wireless telecommunications (cellular mobile telephone services and personal wireless services including all commercial radio services and paging services). Other types of wireless services are not included. The "service address" (see definition and notes at section _.1(e)) for wireless retailers is the customer's billing address. _.2 Registration of telecommunications providers This Section requires all telecommunication providers to register with the municipality on a'form to be provided by the municipality. Telecommunications providers are exempt from registration if they have already filed a return pursuant to A(c). Registration need not be renewed, but material changes to the information provided at the time of registration require an updated submission. The Act preempts imposition of additional fees on telecommunications retailers paying the MTIMF, and the Subcommittee believes that, in light of the likely nominal cost of receiving and keeping the records and the advantages resulting from having the information, it would be advisable not to require a fee from any registrant. ____.3 Municipal telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fee 3 Section 20 of the Act provides that a municipality may impose a m1111icipal infrastructure maintenance fee (MTIMF) in an amount not to exceed 1%. Section _.3(a) of the proposed ordinance provides for the MTIMF. When preparing the ordinance for presentation to your corporate authorities, the amount of the MTIMF imposed by your municipality must be specified in Section _.3(a) and must be in 1/4 increments not to exceed 1 %. Upon the effective date of the-,MTIMF imposed by the proposed MTIMF Ordinance, the 1% fee is the only fee a municipality may impose on a telecommunications retailer for the use of the municipal right-of-way. .3(c) The manner of collection, enforcement, etc. is provided for in Section .3 of the proposed MTIMF Ordinance. The Act provides that the billing statement shall contain a separate bill identifying the amount charged as the MTIMF. However, the Act is unclear about combining separate line items payable to the municipality and the state. 4 Collection, enforcement and administration of telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fee Subsection (a;) provides that the MTI1MF must be added as a customer charge to each bill sent to each service address in the municipality. The language is taken ft•om Section 25(a) of the Act. Subsection (b) provides the timing and mechanics of payment. It requires that the retailer remit the MTIMF to the municipality, and also entitles the retailer to retain up to 2% of the MTIMF collected to offset its administrative costs. These two features are taken directly from Section 25(c) of the Act. The Act does not indicate a collection interval, so the Subcommittee added language requiring remittance no later than the last day of the month following receipt of payment from the customer. This period is consistent with the billing practices of most retailers and is the typical cycle for collection of the municipal telecommunications tax or utility tax by municipalities. The Act makes no provision for the manner of payment of the MTIMF by a retailer. The Subcommittee added language authorizing the municipal administrator to prescribe the form of the return that should accompany payment. It is recommended that the form used by a municipality require the retailer to certify the accuracy of the return and the amount remitted. Again, this is consistent with existing practice in the collection of the municipal telecommunications tax or utility tax. _.4(d) The Act does not include provisions concerning the nature of the debt due to the municipality, or language authorizing its collection as a debt by the retailer. The Subcommittee believes that additional language for this puoo e is needed in a local ordinance. The language in subsection (d) is adApt d C! from State lav authorizing the municipal telecommunications tax [65 ILCS 5/8-11-17(b)], and operates in the same manner. Tile MTIMF is a debt due to the retailer and may be collected by the retailer in the same manner as the debt for service. _.4(e) The Act provides no direction to municipalities on how to deal with a retailer's request for a refund of overpayments of the MTIMF. Subsection (e) provides that retailers receive _a credit for overpayments against amounts presently due or due in the future, and limits claims for over payments to those made within three years after the date of erroneous payment. A limited exception is allowed for claims for credit. _.4(f) Under the Act, payments made by customers under an ordinance imposing the MTMff are excluded from the tax base of certain taxes which may also be paid by the customer. This avoids the imposition of a tax on the MTEAR Subsection (f) is taken directly from Section 25(d) of the Act, and lists the taxes for which the MTEMY must be excluded from "gross charges": the telecommunications excise tax, the municipal utility tax, and the municipal telecommunications tax. , In order to maintain consistency and to avoid inadvertent overpayment, the Subcommittee recommends that any municipality which currently imposes and collects either a municipal utility tax or a municipal telecommunications tax amend those ordinances so as to provide in them as well that the MTEMF is excluded from "gross charges." The Act also excludes the MTEAF from the definition of "gross revenue," upon which a telecommunications retailer calculates the amount of tax on gross revenue due to the State under the Public Utilities Act. This exclusion is also included in the model ordinance. A municipality enacting the MTIMF should also reserve to itself the right to audit payments and accounts of telecommunications retailers to verify the accuracy of their returns. Subsection (g) authorizes this procedure, and imposes a 5% penalty on the amount of the underpayment and reimbursement of costs not to exceed 5% of the amount of the underpayment on a telecommunications retailer found to have failed to properly pay the MTEME The Subcommittee believes that municipalities should provide for the issuance of administrative regulations, so that municipal administrators may address technical or procedural matters concerning collection of the MTIMF without the need to amend the municipal code or ordinances. Promulgation of returns and other forms to be used by retailers in remitting the MTIlAF and regulations providing for payment by electronic transfer, are both examples of matters properly handled by administrative regulations. .5 The MTIlvM is intended to be the sole municipal compensation for right-of- way use by telecommunications retailers. Section 30 of the MTM4F expressly G reserves, however, the municipal authority to impose generally applicable taxes, right-of-way construction standards, and antenna and tower location standards. This Section expressly implements this reserved authority, consistent with Section _.2(b) of the ordinance, which imposes the MTIMF. This Section is also consistent with the Telephone Company Act, as now amended. Subsection (d) of this Section expressly reserves Municipal authority and control over property which is not the subject of the Infrastructure Maintenance Fee Act, i.e. non -right-of-way. _.6 Section 30 of the Infrastructure Maintenance Fee Act grandfathers existing franchise, license, and similar agreements, even as to franchise or other fees, until the expiration of their current terms. If, however, a municipality chooses to impose the MTEMF, rather than stand on the franchise fees provided for in existing franchise, license, and similar agreements, terms other than the franchise fees terms will continue in effect provided such terms are not contrary to the Infrastructure Maintenance Fee Act. In other words, right-of- way use and construction standards contained in the franchise agreements will continue in effect, unless such terms are clearly contrary to any provisions in the Act. —•7 The Subcommittee included specific reference to existing Code provisions for penalties. for non-compliance with the Ordinance. Municipalities are free, however, to impose such penalties expressly in this Ordinance. It may be that municipalities desire to impose fines in amounts higher than specified in the general penalty provision of the Village/City Code. - The statutory limitations on fines will not apply to home rule units. .8 Fines will not serve as the exclusive enforcement mechanism under the Ordinance. _•9 The Subcommittee felt that this Ordinance should be severable, so that if a minor or technical provision were held invalid, the MTLW would still continue in effect. If, however, the MTDAF itself were held invalid, then the franchise fees under existing agreements would go back into effect by virtue of Section 3(a) of the Ordinance, which states that the municipal waiver of franchise fees will be effective only while the MTIMF is subject to being lawfully collected. .10 Most municipal codes will have existing provisions relating to private use of municipal rights-of-way, including permitting, fees, surety, etc. Those provisions will need to be retained, as they will govern right-of-way users other than telecommunications retailers. This Section of this Ordinance is intended to expressly resolve any conflict between the provisions of this Ordinance and any other such provisions. Section 3: Waiver and Fee Implementation Z (a) The Act requires that, in order to impose an MTIMF against any telecommunications retailers, the municipality must waive all fees, charges and other compensation paid pursuant to any existing franchises 90 days prior to imposition of the MTIMF. Because the Act does not take effect until January 1, 1998, the MTIMF cannot be imposed prior to that date. Therefore, subsection (a) waives all fees, charges and other compensation due to the municipality pursuant to existing telecommunications franchises, licenses, and similar agreements commencing January 1, 1998 or 90 days after notice is given, whichever is later. If the MTIMF is enjoined either temporarily or permanently, the Ordinance provides that the waiver will not be effective. (b) Subsection (b) directs the municipal clerk to send notice of the waiver by certified mail to each current telecommunications retailer with a franchise, license, or similar agreement. This notice is required to be certified by mail/return receipt requested by the Act and must be given at least 90 days prior to the imposition of the MTRVIF. A draft notice of the fee waiver is provided with this packet. (c) Section 25(f) of the Act requires a 90 day waiting period after waiver of franchise fees under existing franchises, licenses, and similar agreements. This subsection provides that the MTIMF will become effective on the first day of the month not less than 90 days after written waiver of the franchise fees. However, the waiver is only effective during such time that the fee is subject to being lawfully imposed and collected. If no franchises exist when the MTIlVIF is enacted, it is effective January 1, 1998 or on the effective date of the ordinance. Section 4: Effective Date This Ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form. Fee Waiver Form The Act requires that, prior to imposition of an MTIMF, the municipality waive all fees, charges and other compensation paid pursuant to all franchises, licenses, and similar agreements with telecommunications retailers. The Act requires that this notice be given at least 90 days prior to imposition of the MTIMF. Paragraph 1 of the Fee Waiver Form gives notice that the MTIMF ordinance has been passed and the date on which an MTIMF will be imposed. In preparing the Fee Waiver Form, the January 1, 1998 date should be replaced with the first day of the month that is at least 90 days after the notice if the notice is not given by October 3, 1997. In addition, the correct amount of the MTIMF imposed should be inserted. Paragraph 2 provides the actual waiver of the fees, charges and other compensation paid pursuant to the existing telecommunications franchise, license, or similar agreement. It also indicates that all other terms of the franchise, license, or similar agreement will remain in effect until its expiration and that the waiver of the fees, charges, and other compensation are only effective during the time that the MTIMF is subject to being lawfully imposed and collected. This is to protect the municipality in case the MTIMF is challenged and collection is either temporarily or permanently enjoined. VA Model Form for Notice of Imposition of Infrastructure Maintenance Fee To ensure that the maximum number of telecommunications retailers are aware of the municipality's imposition of the MTIMF so that they can promptly begin collecting it, notice should be given to as many telecommunications retailers as possible as early as possible. The model notice form was prepared as a guide for the proper contents of such a notice. The IML is planning on providing a method of group notice to telecommunications providers regarding ordinance enactment by municipalities. If you would like to be included in this group mailing, notification to the IML along with a copy of your ordinance is required by November 12, 1997. Lists of telecommunications providers obtained from the Illinois Commerce Commission are available from the IML, for those municipalities which desire to provide their own notice. However, these lists are quite lengthy, thus participation in the League's group notice is recommended. Model Telecommunications Provider Registration Form To enable municipalities to know who is acting as a telecommunications retailer or as a telecommunications provider (such as a wholesaler that sells excess line capacity to telecommunications retailers) and who may be located in public streets and rights-of-way, the model. ordinance requires these entities to do a one, -time registration with the municipality. This registration must be updated from time to time as the registration information cltanges. The model. registration form is intended as an example that would obtain the relevant information. E FEE WAIVER FORM 1997 V E IED MAIL _ R:ET N R.E F PTEOUESTED [Send one to each current telecommunications franchisee] Re: Notice of Implementation of Municipal Infrastructure Maintenance Fee and Waiver of All Fees, Charges and Other Compensation Pursuant to Existing Franchise Agreements, Licenses, and Similar Agreements Dear On 1997 the Village [City] of passed and approved Ordinance No. implementing a Municipal Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee which will be effective on the first day of the month not less than ninety (90) days after this notice and during the time the Village [City] imposes a municipal telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fee. The Infrastructure Maintenance Fee is [1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1]% of Gross Charges as defined in Public Act 90-154 and the Village [City]'s Ordinance. A copy of the Village [City] ordinance is enclosed. In addition, you are hereby notified that on the first day of the month not less than (ninety) 90 days after due notice and during the time Village [City] imposes the Municipal Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee, the Village [City] of has waived all fees, charges and other compensation that may. accrue after the effective date of the waiver pursuant to the Franchise Agreement with [name of company] dated . All other terms of the Franchise Agreement will remain in effect until its expiration. This waiver shall only be effective during the time the Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee is subject to being lawfully imposed and collected. If you have any questions regarding this notice or the Municipal Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee, please contact Very truly yours, VILLAGE/[CITY] OF Village/[City] Clerk T': C�I� I' I'C) `1" Old OF" 1';1*"R S I.i �►I 'I'F ►. +• 1��EE 1997 [Send one to each current telecommunications retailer] Re: Notice of Imposition of Municipal Infrastructure Maintenance Fee Dear On , 1997 the Village [City] of passed and approved Ordinance No. implementing a Municipal Telecommunications Infrastructure Maintenance Fee which will be effective January 1, 1998 [or ] and during the time the Village [City] imposes a municipal telecommunications infrastructure maintenance fee. The Infrastructure Maintenance Fee is [1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 11% of Gross Charges as defined in Public Act 90-154 and the Village [City]'s Ordinance. A copy of the Village [City] ordinance is enclosed. In addition, you are hereby notified that effective January 1, 1998 or 90 days after due notice and during the time Village [City] imposes the Telecommunication Infrastructure Maintenance Fee, the Village [City] of has waived all fees, charges and other compensation to be paid to the Village [City] pursuant to existing franchise agreements, licenses, or similar agreements that may become due after the effective date of the waiver. If you have any questions regarding this notice or the infrastructure maintenance fee, please contact Very truly yours, VILLAGE/[CITY] OF Village/[City] Clerk Model Village [City] of Telecommunications Provider Registration Form applicablePursuant to 2(a) of [Article /Chapter) of the Village [City] Code, all telecommunications providers are required within [30 days of the effective date of the ordinance] or becoming a telecommunications provider, whichever is later, to register with the Village [City]. In addition to completing this form, applicants must comply with all village [city] codes and ordinances including but not limited to generally •s regarding theof • • •f -way and zoning regulations. All information must be provided, if any question does apply, please indicate "NA" I. GENERAL REGISTRANT INFORMATION II. REQUIRED BUSINESS INFORMATION M. INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROVIDER'S SERVICE (attach additional sheet if necessary) IV. If you own, operate, or control telecommunications equipment located in the right-of-way and lease this equipment to another telecommunications retailer or provider, please list all parties to whom you currently lease telecommunications equipment. V. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO: VI. I HEREBY CERTIFY THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS COMPLETE, TRUE AND CORRECT Signature.- Title: i ature.Title: Nate. NE%M u C Mal 4 r` e C M U [n I C; t 10, n � m ",".:.. a ✓'r^1.."'n ��, Coping with the e, of monopoly franchise and the beginning of open access to public rights- way. Tim Frenzer Corporation Counsel Village of Wilmette LLry LL' rwi Citie "Ic"' a� in r.ighl „d Changing anti q U"tq Now k Get Here? lecommunicati6ns markets Onnovattin eigh 7 C � ✓d^ n$ MSM 7 pen,maets for telecornmqk ications prove ers Prohibi arriers to chise p 4 ise ntry 3cess rms I ► Accescornpetition z� Consist ►M Unic"' lo p"' a., ry way -:'i�5 Corn. p� 11 in regulation of of righ E u F rd Nilu E ♦Maihta-0 co n strut ♦ Prov de , s whit "J Unifo y� Kee .;: he franchise process I control of andards E All "retail pay the:. 41 unIC, i P#" ON Im"F-Will Wor " are obligate to ,fee .TM 7 -way 9 meM 11' cons rut,CF, ric w :„gip^, r othee per etaiers access Frar c iisl ON Im"F-Will Wor " are obligate to ,fee .TM 7 -way rel p� rel e IMFAct Doe N', I The IMF" e • Affect Js ♦ d A ect r— PC$ t ♦ w Y � Aft ct 'l-,'". other t ♦ ::Affect`,,, ,* Utility,o ~ taxes,",' ♦ Affect t does not: n private pr perty 61ns on cell lar or ���P� q !A`• "AMY 11 n 9 �o th^ IMF Every mucalitY will need • Amen-d7.,--Js Code to i th le q• ^tzw o: ose Y 13 Af ♦ Acts... effi 1, 199 M Fee can l ate rfps JanuO , r,,,) ive date -is January collected Ontil r, pe Munici adopt,"I nanc i h, '':k" Septembers 0 and s ion X1 yes IMF 10 Gu v�x 11 U Y ,,,,.&t�.�Ionzs-The Mosl i is w ' fi n "it i Areas are pry►k or co 7 Ii I f he Act's omissi6n of f right-of-wa get acce s to Ks, Ovate or perp se&.'.� r"�ti Moder . w � utility e� Mode nc, Property owned or lease* + Buildings, structures or other improvements Any other "proprietary' holdings 12 MAYOR Gerald L. Farley TRUSTEES George A, Clowes Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Daniel A. Nocchi Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK Carol A. Fields Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 AGENDA BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Wednesday, September 24, 1997 Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES (August 27 1997) OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS Update - Downtown Redevelopment Ad Hoc Committee VI. ADJOURNMENT Phone: (847)392-6000 Fax: (847) 392-6022 TDD: (847) 392-6064 Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, ]EL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064. X:\USERS\COMDEV\PLNG\BDDRC\AGENDA.BDR MAYOR Gerald L. Farley TRUSTEES George A. Clowes Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Daniel A. Nocchi Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Jannis VILLAGE CLERK Carol A. Fields Village of Mont Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS - SPECIAL MEETING Mount Prospect Senior Center 50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P.M. I IAWITIMammumma ZBA-20-97 ZBA-21-97 ZBA-22-97 603 South Bob -O -Link 909 West Willow Lane Mount Prospect National Bank Phone: (847) 392-6000 Fax: (847)392-6022 TDD: (847) 392-6064 ZBA-23-97 505 North Prospect Manor/Robbins Variation to reduce the required front yard building setback to accommodate a covered porch (Section 14.1005.B.1) VILLAGE BOARD FINAL ZBA-25-97 The petitioner is seeking text amendments to Sections 14.305; 14.2102; 14.1702; 14.1902; 14.703 and 14.2401 to create definitions and regulations regarding Personal Wireless Service Facilities Ordinance for the Village. VILLAGE BOARD FINAL Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064. FINANCE COMMISSION The Finance Commission Meeting scheduled for Thursday, September 25, 1997 has been cancelled. The next meeting of the commission will be held on Thursday, October 16, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. to discuss the proposed 1998 budget. The meeting will be held in the 2nd floor conference room at the Village Hall. Subsequent meetings will be held on October 30, 1997 and November 13, 1997 to further discuss the proposed budget. MAYOR Gerald L. Farley TRUSTEES George A. Clowes Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Daniel A. Nocchi Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK Carol A. Fields 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 MINUTES COFFEE WITH COUNCIL Saturday, September 13, 1997 9:00 a.m. 2nd Floor Conference Room, Village Hall Phone: (847) 392-6000 Fax: (847) 392-6022 TDD: (847) 392-6064 Trustee Clowes convened the meeting at 9:00 a.m. Those present were: Trustees George Clowes and Dan Nocchi. Representing staff was Community Development Director, Bill Cooney. Residents in Attendance: Name Frank Smith Jim Corman Ellen & Gary Nowickas Patrick Creen Anita & Earl Brandon Address 903 Quince Lane 1.348 Indigo Drive 414 S. Main Street 1015 Church Road 419 S. Ojibwa Trail Frank Smith, 903 Quince Lane, thanked the Village for providing the informational packet regarding the proposed second rail track for the Wisconsin Central Railroad. He indicated that he was concerned about the amount of trains (52) that would be utilizing the railroad and specifically the number of freight trains. He recommended that the Village mail additional information packets to a greater number of homes in the area. In addition, he suggested that the packets be sent to Maryville Academy and the Forest View residents. Trustee Nocchi suggested that the cover letter be sent to residents one block over from the initial mailing and that Maryville be sent a copy of the packet. There was general discussion regarding the Village's authority over the railroad and explanation that the railroad was generally autonomous from local regulations. Mr. Smith stated that he believed the freight trains should be prohibited from utilizing the tracks from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. He was encouraged to send correspondence to his State and Federal representatives. Mr. Smith also indicated a concern regarding neighbors parking their vehicles over the sidewalk. Mr. Cooney informed him that this was not allowed and that he should call the Police to address any such problems. Mr. Smith indicated that he did not want to call the Police on his neighbors and requested that the Police be more proactive in enforcing this regulation. He also indicated a concern that the neighbors find out who called the Police and that this created dissention in the neighborhood. Mr. Cooney indicated that it is Village policy not to inform neighbors of who is complaining. Mr. Smith and Mr. Nowickas stated that this had been a problem in the past. Trustee Clowes suggested that the Village include an article in the Village Newsletter explaining this Village policy and other regulations that are often violated. Jim Corman,1348 Indigo Drive, stated that he was attending this morning's meeting for the same subject, the Wisconsin Central Railroad. He indicated appreciation for the Village Board's attendance at the recent public hearing and stated that he would continue to lobby his Representatives to move the second line and the Prospect Heights Station away from the single family homes in Mount Prospect. Ellen and Gary Nowickas, 414 S. Main Street, stated that their concern related to basement flooding that had occurred on 8/16/97. They stated that they had several inches of combined storm sewage in their basement after the rain that evening. They stated that this was the third time in seventeen years that they have had flooding in their home. They asked what the Village's plans were to address this problem. Mr. Cooney indicated that the Village has undertaken a multi-year, multi-million dollar program to address flooding problems in the Village. In addition, the Village sponsors a Flood Rebate Program that provides homeowners with subsidies for improvements made on private property. There was extensive discussion regarding the overall flooding problem in Mount Prospect, who should be responsible for the problem and the fairness of the Village's programs. Trustee Clowes requested that the Public Works Department analyze the storm water drainage patterns, the existing infrastructure and future improvements that are planned in the Nowickas' neighborhood. He requested that a written response be provided to the Nowickas. Trustee Nocchi stated that he felt that storm water management would be a good topic for a Committee of the Whole discussion in the future. Patrick Creen, 1015 Church Road, indicated a concern with the status of the roadway improvements on Church Road. He stated that the Village had, started the work approximately six weeks ago and had ripped up the roadway and infrastructure at that time. However, no work has transpired since and subsequent flooding had occurred in the neighborhood as a result. He inquired about the status and questioned the oversight of the project. Mr. Cooney stated that he would contact the Engineering Division and have a representative contact Mr. Creen to advise of the status. Mr. Creen also indicated that the recent Village Newsletter stated that the Village had raised the local sales tax significantly and that he felt that this would deter people from shopping in Mount Prospect. Trustee Nocchi explained that the Village did not raise the sales tax and that the Newsletter had incorrectly listed the actual tax increase that was approved to pay for the roadway program. Mr. Creen also stated that the parking lot at Kopp Park, off of Linneman Road, was in disrepair and looked especially bad in light of the recent Linneman Road upgrade. He was informed that this was the Mount Prospect Park District's property and that he could discuss this matter with them. Mr. Creen did indicate his appreciation of the Village Board's efforts toward improvements in his neighborhood. Anita & Earl Brandon, 419 S. Ojibwa, stated that their concern related to the proposed extension of water and sanitary sewer, to their home. Mr. Brandon stated that this was the third time that he had appeared at one of these meetings regarding this issue. He thought that the issue had been resolved, but after further discussion with staff that he was informed that he would be required to pay for the future extension of the infrastructure at such time that his neighbor wished to obtain these public services. He feels that this is unfair since his neighbor to the north was not required to extend the improvements to his property line. Mr. Cooney indicated that Village Code requires that the public improvements be extended to the far end of the property and that is why staff was requiring Mr. Brandon to do so. He stated he did not know why the neighbor to the north was not required to do the same at the time he installed the existing improvements. Both Trustee Clowes and Nocchi indicated that they felt it would not be equitable to require Mr. Brandon to pay for the full cost of the public improvements, given the precedent set on Ojibwa. They requested that the Public Works Department provide a memorandum outlining the history of the Ojibwa improvements and the current status of Mr. Brandon's proposed improvements and that the Community Development Department provide a memorandum outlining Mr. Brandon's options. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Willi ?.,Cooney, . Director of Community Development X:WSEBSNOOMDEV,BB„d.1�'B'�t�Vr& 34IN MAYOR Gerald L. Farley TRUSTEES George A. Clowes Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Daniel A. Nocchi Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK Carol A. Fields DEPUTY VILLAGE CLERK V"Ifflage of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 NOTICE ALL ........—aac-vvvv Fax: (847) 392-6022 TDD: (847) 392-6064 MEETING CANCELLATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mount Prospect Committee of the Whole meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 9, 1997 has been cancelled. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Dated this 4th day of September, 1997. Director Glen R. Andler Deputy Director Sean P. Dorsey Village Engineer Jeffrey A. Wulbecker Administrative Aide Dawn L. Wucki Solid Waste Coordinator M. Lisa Angell Water/Sewer Superintendent Roderick T. O'Donovan Streets/Buildings Superintendent Paul C. Bures Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Sandra M. Clark Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent James E. Guenther Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 6005B-2229 Phone B47/B70-5B40 Fax B47/253-9377 TDO B47/392-1235 AGENDA SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING LOCATION: Public Works Department 1700 West Central Road Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 MEETING DATE AND TIME: Monday September 8, 1997 7:30 P.M. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Minutes IV. Citizens to be Heard V. Old Business A. 4 -Way Stop Sign Request at the intersection of Seegwun/Shabonee VI. New Business A. 4 -Way Stop Sign Request at the intersection of Memory/Maple B. 4 -Way Stop Sign Request at the intersection of Tano/Lama VII. Adjournment NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEED SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, MOUNT PROSPECT, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD 847/392-6064 TO ALL COMMISSION MEMBERS IF YOU CAN NOT ATTEND THE SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING ****** PLEASE CALL SEAN WON 870-5640 IN ADVANCE ....w 1. C.... 1-6 7 QN Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM IMCMVSA To: Safety Commission From: Project Engineer Date: September 2, 1997 Subject: 4 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF SEEGWUN/SHABONEE This 4 -way stop sign request was originally requested by Mr. John Fox, 516 S. Seegwun Avenue and discussed in September, 1995. At that time, the Safety Commission recommended to deny the request. The Village Board concurred with the Commission's recommendation. At the meeting, Chairman Beening recommended the Village to implement the following four steps and bring this issue back at a future meeting to discuss the effectiveness of the steps implemented: 1) Stepped-up police speed enforcement 2) Install more speed limit signs 3) Install Caution Club Entrance Signs 4) Contact Mt. Prospect Park District to install stop signs on their parking lot driveways. The Public Works Department completed the above recommendations 2), 3), and 4) and the Police Department increased speed enforcement at this area. To review the effect of the recommendations, new traffic counts were to be performed during May and June to include the impact of golf traffic. Because of malfunctioning of the traffic counters and then one of the counters being stolen from the site, the counts taken in 1996 were invalid. Therefore, new traffic counts were again performed from Wednesday, May 28 to Monday, June 2, 1997. The 1995 & 1997 traffic counts are compared as follows: 85th Percentile Speed on Seegwun Ave: May, 1995: 30 mph (North/Southbound) May, 1997: 30 - 31 mph (North/Southbound) The 85th percentile speeds on Seegwun Ave have not changed. There is a concern about the vehicle speed on Seegwun Ave. Note that the speed limit of Seegwun Ave is 25 mph. Traffic Volumes (Peak 8 Hour Period): May, 1995: 1412 Vehicles/Peak 8 Hour Period May, 1997: 1185 Vehicles/Peak 8 Hour Period The traffic volume at this intersection was reduced approximately 16% and does not meet the minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant (500 x 8 = 4000 cars/8 hrs). Accidents: No accidents occurred between 1993 and 1995. One accident has occurred since 1995. The number of accidents still does not meet the stop sign warrant (minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi -Way Stop Warrants. Recommendation: changesThe 1997 traffic study indicates insignificant .-- .. approximateaccidents at this intersection and % reduction otraffic volume. f thecause this intersection still •o not •• sign warrants. The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: No change in the traffic control at this intersection. Sean Won hicle Counts Hourly Vehicle Counts Hourly Ve on See Gwun Avenue and Sha-Bonee Trail on See-Gwun Avenue and Sha-Bonee Trail (Beginning 05/28/97 to 06/02/97) Hourly Vehicle Counts Hourly Vehicle Counts on See-Gwun Avenue and Sha-Bonee Trail on See-Gwun Avenue and Sha-Bonee Trail (Beginning 012I97 to 06/02197 10oninninn ns/98/97 to 06/02/97) Street: SEE-GWUN south of Sha-Bonee _ WEather: Clear Direction North SPEED (MPH Date Time Total 1-19 20-21 22-23 24-25 26-27 28-29 a 32-33 34-35 36-37 38-39 40-41 Over 41. 5/28/97 16:00 78 24 11 4 4 11 7* .' 7 2 0 0 0 5128/97 17:00 86 22 2 11 8 µa 11 15 s 6 _ 3 - — 5/28/97 18:00 70 25 3 2 7 ... 9 7 sr 5 3 0 0 0 0 8 6,r 2 1 1 0 0 0 5/28/97 19:00 68 24 7 6 6 .. 0' p p p 5/28/97 20:00 31 12 2 2 7 3 1; 2 0 0 0 0 5/28/97 21:00 ... 27 11 2 2 2 51 1 p 0 2 0 0 0 1 5/28/97 22:00 10 3 1 0 p p p p p 5/28/97 23:00 5 2 1 0 0 1 1 1' 0 5/29/97 0:00 6 1 0 0 0 0 r p p p 0 5/29/97 1:00 3 _ 0 1 0 p p 2 YTA Rol .; 0 0 0 0 0 5/29/97 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 � 0 0 p',s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5/29/97 3:00 1 0 1 0 ate 0 p p 0 0 0 5/29/97 4:00 4 4 0 0 0 0Mn ✓ 5/29/97 5:00 9 7 0 1 0 0 1 g, 0 0 0 O 0 0 5/29/97 6:00 23 4 1 2 1 5 3 8 12 11 �; '� 4 2 0 0 0 0 5/29/97 7:00 68 17 5 3 �"e 0 5/29/97 8:00 1 1 p 0 0 53 30 6 1 4 5 1 0 4 4 2 4 "f," ^ p 0 1 0 5/29/97 9:00 31 12 1 3 p 1 p 0 0 5/29/97 10:00 37 19 5 3 0 3 _?, ' . 5 8 7"° 3 0 1 0 0 0 5/29/97 11:00 67 29 5 6 1 1 1 1 0 0 5/29/97 12:00 52 24 1 7 4 3 4 5/29/97 13:00 50 18 8 6 1 7? p 1 3 0 0 0 5129/97 14:00 58 27 6 5 2 8 3 5 1 0 .. 5/29/97 15:00 71 25 7 6 5 9 2 4 2 0 0 0 5/29/97 16:00 75 26 3 4 8 12 5 5 3 4 0 0 1 5/29/97 17:00 101 28 7 10 9 9 14 5 4 1 2 0 0 5/29/97 18:00 81 29 5 10 4 5 11. 1 1 3 7 5 k 1 0 0 0 5/29/97 19:00 52 24 3 5`� 3 3 0 0 0 0 5/29/97 20:00 52 16 p 2" 5._ _1 " p 2 0 1 0 0 5/29/97 21:00 41 14 5 3 2 7_-- 2 1 p p p 1 5/29/97 22:00 19 3 3 1 1 2 2, p 0 Sd29/97 23:00 5 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 p 0 5/30/97 0:00 13 3 1 2 1 0 5/30/97 1:00 6 0 1 0 2 0 1� " 0 0 0 p 0 0 5/30/97 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 5/30/97 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 p p p 0 5/30/97 4:00 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 p 0 0 0 5/30/97 5:00 7 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 19xM 1 0 2 0 0 5/30197 6:00 13 2 1 p3 5 1 2 0 5/30/97 7:00 70 23 4 2 6 6 9 v� 0 1 0 1 5/30/97 8:00 73 276 8 5 5 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 5/30/97 9:00 36 18 1 2 1 1 p 1 0 0 5130/97 10:00 67 32 5 3 4 9 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 5/30/97 11:00 49 18 1 3 4 7 8 1 3 0 1 2 0 5/30/97 12:00 44 15 4 3 3 3 5� I"$ �' 3 0 1 p 0 5/30/97 13:00 68 28 8 7 6 5 7'rvr°� 1 p 1 1 5/30/97 14:00 70 38 2 4 6 5 8 Y 0 0 p 0 5/30197 15:00 86 37 9 8 14 9 5'` r° p 5/30/97 16:00 91 47 6 11 9 12 2 p 0 1 0 1 0 0 p 3 4 5/30/97' 17:00 112 53 12 7 12 9 7 fi� � 5 1 2 0 0 5/30/97 18:00 78 33 7 10 5 5 8 1 1 0 p p 0 0 5/30/97 19:00 45 8 6 7 5 6 5 p 1 5/30/97 20:00 15 4 2 0 0 5 2 1 0 0 „5 187 255 2.32 ' 11" 1 96 60 25 14 4 12 TnTat 2280. 871 180 18 5] HOZ.... 0 L 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 00.OZ L6/OE/9 0 0 p p 0 0 S y Z £ S L L 6£ 00:6 L L6/0£/S 0 0 0 0 0 Z '£ E 6 y g £Z l9 00:9 L L6/0£/S 0 0 0 0 £ L L L 8 LZ l9 00:LL L6/0£/9 `; � 0 0 0 0 Z ,� Z £ 8 8 £ 8L Sb 00�9L L6/01 0 0 0 0 L Z 9 O L O L 9 L £Z 99 OO S L L6/0£/S Z 0 L 0 £ Z ' 6 L L 8 L ZZ Z9 OO t� L L6/0£/S 0 Z 5 E 6 Z L Sti 00 £ L L6/0'C/9 p 0 ZZ Z E Z L 9 L S£ OO Z L L61OE1S 0 Z ° Z �r 0 S q Z £ L S£ OO L L L6/0E/S L 0 0 L L Z a, 0 0 0 0 0 Z 5 Z £ �L Oi� OO:OL MOM p 0 0 Z l £� �.. ,E 5 Z S 8 5E 00=6 L6/0£/9 L 5 Z 9 6L 85 00:8 MOM L 0 0 L Zu L 0 0 L �, 8 g L 9 LL E9 OO L L6/O£/S X ti 0 L OE 00 9 L6/OE/5 0 0 0 p L Z $T.. Z £ £ L 0 Z L 9 E L 00:9 L6/OE/S 0 L E 001, MOM 0 p 0 L 0 .0 �'` 0 O 0 0 s; 0 l L 0 0 0 Z 00:£ L6/OE/S 0 0 0 0O O ` 0 0 0 0 0 L OO�Z L6/0£/S p 0 0 0 r, 0 L 0 0 0 L 00: L L6/0£/5 0 0 0 0 0 Ot p Z L 00 0 L6/0£/S 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 L Z __ . L p 0 8 5Z OO LZ L6/6215 0 p 0 L L L L 0 0 L Z E t' y L £ y Z L Sti 00 6 L 16/6Z/9 0 Z L 0-- 8 L 65 00:8 L L6/6Z/5 0 0 0 0 Z £ rL 0L 5 Z 0 Z S S S L 9 8L LS OO�LL L6/6Z/9 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 £ Z*.„ Z 9 l Z �L 9E 0091 L6/6Z/S '0 0 0 LE5 OO:SL 1-616Z/9L L Z � _ 8 y S 37 £ L St' 00:V L L6/6Z/9 L 0 L 0 0 £ Z 0 0 0 0 S 1 S L L 9E OTU L L6/6Z/5 X Y ... 0 L 0 Z Ol EE £ � OO�Z L L6/6Z/S s g g L Z 8 Z£ OO L L L6/6Z/S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 5 9 £ 8 E L 95 00 8 L6/6Z/5 0 0 L 0 Z ti L Ir 5l 9S OO�L L6/6Z/5 9 ££ 00:9 L6/6Z/5 a ' 0 �„ � �, L,,.... L L 0 L £ OL 00:5 L6/6 /9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L L L 0 0 0 0 0 E 00:� L6/6Z/9 �"0 0 0 00:£ L6/6Z/ 0 0 0 0 0_ O OO:Z L6/6Z/5 0 p p 0 0 0 i O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L E OO:l L6/6Z/S 0 0 0 L 0 0 f 0 0 0 L r ww L Z 00 0 L6/6Z/5 0 0 0 0 0 0_ p 00:£Z L6/8Z/9 F 0 0 0 0 L 0 0 0 00 L° L 0 0 L 0 ° L Z L 0 L £ L L OO ZZ L6/8Z/S 0 0 0 0 L Z — £ OZ 00 LZ L6/8Z/S 0 0 p p 0 0 E L� b S 0 0 0 L L 00:OZ L6/8Z/5 0 L Z S S S y Z S LE 00 6 L L6/8Z/5 0 0 0 5 Z L Z L 9L 9£ 00 8l L6/8Z/S/8Z/S 00:L L L6/8Z/S p 0 0 0 £6 ... 5 ti 0 L L 0 4 L , S E 9 £ 9 Z L St, 00:91 L6/ Z/S r £ L 8v LO:S L L6/87/5 0 0 0 Z Z E 5 S 5 S S. y 6Z -SZ LZ -9Z SZ-bZ EZ -ZZ Z -OZ 6l -L 1e101 aw!1 a;ea LVIaAo lti-Oti 6£-8E LE -9£ S£-tE'££-Z£� .._,. puno4U;nOS uol;Oa�iQ (I-Idl/q) a'33dS .. aaUlos NfM jealo :iaye3J-3�Siaa��g' Em .. i Hourly Vehicle Counts on See --un Avenue and Sha-Bonee Trail (Beginning 05/16/95 to 05/22/95) Sha- -51::i:lee 1/ t of See -G un IN 1 0 Average Vehicle/h Iq Hourly Vehicle Counts on Bee-wun Avenue and Sha-Bonee Trail (Beginning 05/16/95 to 05/22/95) She-Bcnee at cif See- EN gzammm El f El Hourly Vehicle Counts on See- un Avenue and Sha-Bonee Trail (Beginning 05/16/95 to 05/22/95) Dourly Vehicle Counts on See- un Avenue and Sha-Bonee Trail (Beginning 05/16/95 to 05/22/95) a ' IMMEN SPOT SPEED STUDY LOCATION ON SC�e �<a�!/ AT DIRECTION RECORDED �— S LEGAL SPEED �� �J��� RECORDED BY ,' DA DATEITIME 3 d Int 0 SPEED NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS P2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 WEATHER rge - REMARKS No. % of lAccm- Fx 40 Veh. Total TOTAL ��... �,....Ems �' �■� D 0 No =C � C�• m an No FINE.5ME coff �� � : 9� Elmo @e . eta ... .e 0 TOTAL 4W\.t_7 @. Mount Prospect Public Works Department TIM My USA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Safety Commission From: Project Engineer Date: September 2, 1997 Subject: 4 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF MEMORY LN AND MAPLE ST Requested by: Ms. Jane Meyers, 503 North Maple Street (petition attached). All residents t this will beitin 250 tdiscussed at 7:30 P. M uon Monday September of this intersection nclding Ms. Meyers were informed t 8, 1997, at the Public Works Department. Request: 4 -Way Stop Signs at Memory Ln and Maple St (see attached map) Comments: Resident Observations: Ms. Meyers is concerned about the safety of children at this intersection. She states that there are many pre-school or school age children near the the intersection. Staff Observations:. The Engineering Staff performed a stop sign study. The findings are as follows: a) Accidents A search of the accident reports indicated: Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Number of Accidents 0 0 0 1 1 The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant (minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi - Way Stop Warrants. b) Speeding Study Representative speed surveys were performed on Maple St north of Memory Ln (see data sheets attached). The 85th percentile speeds are follows: Southbound Maple 23-24 mph Northbound Maple 25-26 mph The speed limits of Memory Ln and Maple St are 25 mph. There is not a speeding problem at this intersection. C) Traffic Volume The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant is 500 vehicles/hour for an eight hour period (500 x 8 = 4000 cars/8 hrs). The traffic volume at this intersection (325 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 8% of the stop sign warrant. d) Sight Obstruction A number of parkway trees are located at the intersection. However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction problems. e) Survey Results A total of 26 surveys were sent out in July, 1997 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion. 15 surveys were returned to the Village. 14 residents favored and one resident was against the 4 -way stop sign at Memory/Maple. Recommendation: Because the intersection of Memory Ln and Maple St does not meet any of the multi -way stop sign warrants, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: 4 -way stop signs at the intersection of Memory Ln and Maple St not be installed. Sean Won 4 ro z CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR A STOP I , 1, , MEMORYCORNER OF AND wl'LL. µ „ NAME ADDRESS CHILDREN AGES 3 1 444A.41 2 ,. kAl�-1�� a r 5 ' OL 10 C 12 At do 13 0 14 27 28 29 30 '31{ CON VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT. ILLINOIS F s J r�► h wot WATER DISTRIBUTION MAP WHEELING TOWNSHIP C16 W.1/2 N.E.1�/4 Sec.34-42-11 r Mr s2 Ca «K lero; nwx SG«a L a* « ' _ 709 o CMBwK �Q co o `Lp`� N 621 1 • ��,° 211 N N JUDITH ANN DRj� o 0 w � 611-617 ' Awa u n w 609 601 p E HI 1 523 522 523 5'. S 3 n 521 1 520521 520 521 520 521 519 515 519 515 519 518 519 517 516 517 518 517 516 517 515 514 515 14 515 514 515 513 512 51.3 512 513 512 513 511 510 511 510 511 510 511 9 508 509 508 509 508 509 507 507 506 507 506 507 505 504 505 04 52 5 504 5 505 503 503 502 0.•...... 503 ?02 5-01 500 501 ti 01 � —5043 501 �« 423 No 4 42 MEMORY LN 423 422 WO 6 tic 421 420 421 420 421 4247 421 W�4 419 418 419 418 419 418 419 vs 417 416 '~^ 417 1 416 417 X16 H' 417 414 o 415 " 414 d 415 414 415 K 413 412 vs u 413 412 413 412 = 413 Z 411 410 u 411 410 411 410 411 = 409 d 408 409 408 409 407 407 406 407 406 407 405 404 405 404 405+ 403 402 403 402 a03 401 4 01 400 401 r r prr:may T • VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT. ILLINOIS F s J r�► h wot WATER DISTRIBUTION MAP WHEELING TOWNSHIP C16 W.1/2 N.E.1�/4 Sec.34-42-11 r Mr s2 Ca «K lero; nwx SG«a L a* « ' I-Ini rrly VPhirIP Cnunts From To Memory Lane (East of Maple Streetl 6/30/97 7/1/97 7/2/97 Average Entering Mon ue ed Cars Memory Lane lest of Maple Streetl) 6/30/97 7/1/97 7/2/97 Average Entering Mon (Wed Cars ue 0:00 A.M. 1:00 A.M. N/A 0 1 1 0 N/A 3 1 2 1 1:00 A.M. 2:00 A.M. 2:00 A.M. 3:00 A.M. N/A N/A 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 N/A N/A 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 __ 1 3:00 A.M. 4:00 A.M. 5:00 A.M. 4:00 A.M. 5:00 A.M. 6:00 A.M. N/A N/A N/A 0 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 2 0 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 0 3 1 0 1 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 6:00 A.M. 7:00 A.M. N/A 4 2 3 2 N/A 7 4 6 3 7:00 A.M. 8:00 A.M. N/A 8 4 6 3 N/A 13 13 13 7 8:00 A.M. 9:00 A.M. N/A 6 6 6 3 N/A 10 7 9 4 9:00 A.M. 10:00 A.M. 10 7 N/A 9 4 14 5 N/A 10 5 10:00 A.M. 11:00 A.M. 5 12 N/A 9 4 5 15 N/A 10 5 11:00 A.M. 12:00 A.M. 1 6 N/A 4 2 7 13 N/A 10 5 12:00 A.M. 1:00 P.M. 7 8 N/A 8 4 19 16 N/A 18 9 1:00 P.M. 2:00 P.M. 11 10 N/A 11 5 12 18 N/A 15 8 2:00 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 10 7 N/A 9 4 20 7 N/A 14 7 3:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 9 10 N/A 10 5 14 16 N/A 15 8 4:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. 9 5 N/A 7 4 22 16 N/A 19 10 5:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. 15 12 N/A 14 7 19 14 N/A 17 8 6:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 8 14 N/A 11 6 18 23 N/A 21 10 7:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 6 9 N/A 8 4 14 18 N/A 16 8 8:00 P.M. 9:00 P.M. 10 7 N/A 9 4 16 12 N/A 14 7 9:00 P.M. 10:00 P.M. 10 10 N/A 10 5 11 18 N/A 15 7 10:00 P.M. 11:00 P.M. 5 3 N/A 4 2 8 9 N/A 9 4 11:00 P.M. 12:00 P.M. 2 4 N/A 3 2 4 5 N/A 5 2 vPhirrlp PPr nav 141 71 Vehicle Per Day 239 120 Hourly Vehicle Counts Maple Street South of Memo Lane From To 6/30/97 7/1/97 7/2/97 Average Ent ar g Mon) ue ed rs1 0:00 A.M. 1:00 A.M. N/A 3 0 2 1:00 A.M. 2:00 A.M. N/A 0 1 1 0 2:00 A.M. 3:00 A.M. N/A 0 0 0 0 3:00 A.M. 4:00 A.W N/A 0 21 1 4:00 A.M. 5:00 A.M. N/A 0 0 0 0 5:00 A.M. 6:00 A.M. N/A 5 6 6 3 6:00 A.M. 7:00 A.M. N/A 10 6 8 4 7:00 A.M. 8:00 A.M. N/A 16 20 18 9 8:00 A.M. 9:00 A.M, N/A 19 19 19 10 9:00 A.M. 10:00 A.M. 9 15 N/A 12 6 10:00 A.M. 11:00 A.M. 15 12 N/A 14 7 11:00 A.M. 12:00 A.M. 18 9 N/A 14 7 12:00 A.M. 1:00 P.M. 22 15 N/A 19 9 1:00 P.M. 2:00 P.M. 26 19 N/A 23 11 _ 2:00 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 10 26 N/A 18 9 3:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 23 24 N/A 24 12 4:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. 21 25 N/A 23 12 5:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. 33 30 N/A 32 16 6:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 21 36 N/A 29 14 7:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 23 24 N/A 24 12 8:00 P.M. 9:00 P.M. 19 14 N/A 17 8 9:00 P.M. 10:00 P.M. 7 19 N/A 13 7 10:00 P.M. 11:00 P.M. 5 4 11:00 P.M. 12:00 P.M. 4 Vehicle Per Da 319 160 From I To 0:00 A.M. 1:00 A.M. 1:00 A.M. 2:00 A.M* 2:00 A.M. 3:00 A.M. 3:00 A.M. 4:00 A.M. 5:00 A.M. 4:00 A.M. 5:00 A.M. 6:00 A.M. 6:00 A.M. 7:00 A.M. 7:00 A.M. 8:00 A.M. 8:00 A.M. 9:00 A.M. 9:00 A.M. 10:00 A.M. 10:00 A.M. 11:00 A.M. 11:00 A.M. 12:00 A.M. 12:00 A.M. 1:00 P.M. 1:00 P.M. 2:00 P.M. 2:00 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M, 8:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 9:00 P.M. 900 P.M. 10.00 P.M. 10:00 P.M. 11:00 P.M. 11:00 P.M. 12:00 P.M. Hourly Vehicle Counts Maple Street (North of Memory Lane Southbound Northbound 6/30/97 7/1/97 7/2/97 Average 6/30/97 7/1/97 Mon)ue a Sia (Mon) (Tue) 7/2/97 1 Average N/A 0 11 N/A 2 0 N/A 0 0_ 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 N/A 0 2 1 N/A 0 N/A 1 1 1 NIA 0 0 N/A 2 5 4 N/A 3 3 N/A 6 7 7 N/A 4 2 N/A 9 9 9 N/A 7 7 N/A 7 5 6 N/A 6 9 N/A 5 9 7 NI 8 7 7 6 N/A 7 2 N/A 7 3 N/A 5 19 N/A g 3 NIA -6 18 - N/A g 10 N/A 9 6 5 N/A 2 18 N/A 10 2 13 N/A 4 7 N/A 6 11 11 N/A 12 12 N/A 12 20E20 N/A 5 12 N/A 9 16 N/A 6 7 N/A 7 8 8 9 N/A 9 12 N/A 6 7 N/A 7 8 2 N/A 1 4 N/A 3 4 6 N/A 1 4 N/A 3 2 3 N/A 2 1 1 N/A Vehicle Per Day 125 Vehicle Per Da Total 3 0 0 1 1 10 13 23 21 22 14 25 25 20 25 28 48 45 33 31 17 13 4 424 Street: Maple St North of Memory Cross St. North of Memory WEather: Clear Direction Southbound S P E E D M P I i Date Time Total 1-20 21-221 25-26 27-28 29-30131-3Z s6-34 40-00 11-30 O'd-4u'+1"4 �vcl -+4 6/30/97 10:00 7 6 1,,,, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 11:00 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 12:00 9 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 13:00 8 7 1 x 01 0 0 0 011111- 0 0 0 0' 0 6/30/97 14:00 2 2 0,���.�, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 15:00 4 3 0%$; 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 16:00 12 10 1 =; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 17:00 5 4 0' 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 18:00 6' 4 2 0 0 0' 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 19:00 8 6 0 '';;;" 1 1' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 20:00 6 5 0:, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6/30/97 21:00 1 0 0 ,, ' 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0' 0 6/30/97 22:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 23:00 2 1 1, .' 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0' 7/1/971 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 7/1/97 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 3:00 0 0 0�°. 01 0' 0 0 0i 0 0� 0 0 0 7/1/97 4:00 1 1 0 s� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 7/1/97 5.00 2 0 0,"`," 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/971 6:00 6 5' 0 F'" 0 0 1 0 0 6-6-0 0 0 7/1/97 7:00 9 3 1'°a°" 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 8:00 7 6 0 ''`,, ,, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 7/1/97 9:00 5 3 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 7/1/97 10:00 6 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 11:00 3 2 0 "; ,°,, ., 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0' 7/1/97 12:00 3 2 1,°, 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 7/1 /97 13:00 10 8 0 d 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 14:00 18 16 1 `° .' 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 15:00 7 4 0, �''";," 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 16:00 12 11 1"": " ,.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 /97 /1/9 17:00 12 8 3 '�a, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1 /97 18:00 7 5 1 i;M ,., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1 /97 19:00 9 7 0 *;' ? 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 20:00 7 6' 0 '� 1 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 7/1/97 21:00 4 4 O,F,� 0'1 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 22:00 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 23:00 1 1 0 ,., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011 0 7/2/97 0:00 1 0 0." 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 1:00 0 0 0, ": 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 2:00 0 0 O,M;',�; 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0' 0 0 0 7/2/97 3:00 2 1 0' r 1 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 4:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 5:00 5 1 ,,; 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 6:00 7 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 7:00 9 7 2' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 8:00 5 3 0,.: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0EA00 7/2/97 9:00 9 8 0,.:,000 85th% tipeea Street: Maple North of Memory Cross St.: Memory WEather Clear Direction Northbound S P E E D (M P H Date Time Total 1-20 21-22 23-24 27-28 29-30 31-32 33-34 35-36 37-38 39-40 41-42 Over 42 6/30/97 10:00 5 5 0 0"'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 11:00 11 8 1 1°°.�„” 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 12:00 11 7 0 1 "" 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6/30/97 13:00 6 3 1 1 " ;: 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 14:00 2 1 1 0;-, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 15:00 11 7 2' 0 .' 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 16:00 20 9 3 3 a" 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 17:00 16 10 3 2> 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 6/30/97 18:00 8t 4 3 1 ,, s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 6/30/97 19:00 12 9 2 0";; '.> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 20:00 8 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 21:00 4 1 1 0 ,> 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 22:00 2 1 1 0, „ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/30/97 23:00 1 0 0 1 0`,`" " 1 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7/1/97 0:00 2 1 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/l/97 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/l/97 2:00 0 0 0 0 ;i ;„,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/l/97 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/971 5:00 31 1 01 0 `' 1 01 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 1/1/97 6:00 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 7:00 7 5 0 1�°” 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 8:00 6 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7/l/97 9:00 8 6 1 0 s" ;" 0 1 67--d— 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 7/1/971 10:00 11:00 2 9 2 5 0 2 0' "' ,, 1 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 12:00 8 3 1 4 'f ' ,, ,' , 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 7/1/97 13:00 5 2 0 0 "<<r„: , 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7/1/97 14:00 131 9 3 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 15:00 11 6 2 2 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/971 16:00 161 8 2 3 '; 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/l/97 17:00 20 9 1 4, 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 18:00 18 13 1 1,>�',., 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/l/97 19:00 10 5 1 0 r% , i, 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 01 0 7/l/97) 20:00 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 21:00' 61 2 1 1' ., ' 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/97 22:00 3 2 01 0.$” ^„ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/1/971 23:00 1 0 0 1 '; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 0:00 0 0 0 0 �,„ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 2:00 0 0 01 0„ ": 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 7/2/97 3:00 0 01 0 0 ,� ,�, 0 0 0' 0 0 0 011,11, 0 0 7/2/97 4:00 0 0 0 0 fi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 7/2/97 5:00 3 0 0 1 ': 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 7/2197 6:00 7:00 2 7 1 2 1 1 0 ." 0 1 0 0 0 0 01 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 8:00 9 8 1 0, !,' ", 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/2/97 9:00 7 —3-2 2 .1 01 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b5tn % bp'�--J k1;dk..NM"W'A4M Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM CM USA To: Safety Commission From: Project Engineer Date: September 2, 1997 Subject: 4 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF TANO LN & LAMA LN Requested by: Ms. Eileen Smith, 2001 E. Tano Lane (Speak Out Letter attached). All residents within 250 ft of this intersection including Ms. Smith were informed that this will be discussed at 7:30 P.M., on Monday, September 8, 1997, at the Public Works Department. Request: 4 -Way Stop Signs at Tano Ln and Lama Ln (see attached map) Comments: Resident Observations: 1) Speeding at the intersection 2) Ms. Smith is concerned about the safety of children at the intersection. Staff Observations: The Engineering Staff performed a stop sign study. The findings are as follows: a) Accidents NO ACCIDENTS FOR THE LAST FIVE YEARS The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant (minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi - Way Stop Warrants. b) Speeding Study Representative speed surveys were performed on Lama Ln north of Tano Ln and on Tano Ln vast of Lama Ln (sae data sheets attached). The 85th percentile speeds are follows: Northbound Lama 25-26 mph Southbound Lama under 20 mph Eastbound Tano 31-32 mph Westbound Tano 29-30 mph The speed limits of Tano and Lama are 25 mph. There is a concern about the speeds of the east/westbound traffic on Tano. c) Traffic Volume The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant is 500 vehicles/hour for an eight hour period (500 x 8 = 4000 cars/8 hrs). The traffic volume at this intersection (665 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 17% of the stop sign warrant. d) Sight Obstruction A number of parkway trees are located at the intersection. However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction problems. e) Survey Results A total of 20 surveys were sent out in July, 1997 to collect and analyze the residents opinion. 17 surveys were returned to the Village. 14 residents favored and 2 residents were against the 4 -way stop sign at Tano/Lama. One resident did not provide an opinion. f) Existing Traffic Control Signs There are 2 -way yield signs on Lama Ln at Tano Ln. Existing traffic control signs near this intersection are shown on the attached map. Recommendation: Because the intersection of Tano Ln and Lama Ln does not meet any of the multi -way stop sign warrants, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: 4 -way stop signs at the intersection of Tano Ln and Lama Ln not be installed. r Sean Won a provides a way in which YOU can Communicate with Mount Prospect ellected receive officiais response . and the if admneed more inistration. Your advice. suggestions, questions and opinions are appreciated and wilyou space, please attach a separate sheet. As a citizen of Mount Prospect. it is MY optril that lop/ O;TIPNA Phone: ✓OPTIONAL Phone: CL 1.) 1, /—�/ Address:, (n Name: Mail to: "Speak Out: Village of Mount Prospect, 100 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056. 12 E CAMP MC DONALD RDzr E CAMP MC DONALD! co 1431 Ln I n cl12n rn- N i 932 `n h 1X28 1429 m m m mp a m rn rn cNi ' v? 1 4,r µ 1425 1427r cD co o N r w p C14 "c' 144 N N N 1 [24 1425 coC)cpi c� - � - - - - -- , � � 1425 4 WOOD LN"1 1423 1418 0 0 0 0 0 - " n 1'420 1421 Ta c+ cn ce rn 1 1418 1416 fl V - 1419 1414 = 1415 1416 14171 1416 1417 1415 L 1417 1416 1417 1412 ;,, 141 3 1 1 414 1415 1 141 4 1415 1414 L 1415 1414 Y 1415 14 i0 m 1411 1 1412 1 14131 1412 z 1 14131 1412 z 1413 1412 a 1413 p o < p x 1 1411 , 1408 = 1 409 14. ! 141 1 1 4 141 1 V 1410 410 1 41 1 = 1407 1403 1 1 tOc 1408 J 1 1409 1 t 4G3 I 1409 1409 1409 1406 m 11-04 14051406 14071 1405 14071 1406 1407 1406 1407 140 1403 1 404 14,051 1404 14051 � 14r,4 ol 14 �a 1402 1403 11402 1 14"" 14 1400 400 1( ( 140 1 401 1400 0 1401 I°�lMk9 Q4.. 1ANO' LNIVO, NO Lk C) r7Os O MO 0 n0 00 r? N t* ¢?y S I�� 1341 c� ? cm mN o o N o O p o w ON c cc 3J O N cD 47 O N Oi O O O O O — — — N N 1340 INrC�-Q d a� rn � c� o� m cC) w "� a;-"-MAFF1 r:. 1 .27 BURR OAK DR c auvTRa 1330 — `n Cin n c G j o � Lo GO7 cOi 09 a C1 cf C� CNi aNi rV — 13201320 1320 x d � �a c' 1318 eD C1 N N o1C4 N o,ti 1321^N 116 PIN OAK DR PIN OAK OR " NO O O CD 1000 n N N N N N N R 1310 1311 1312cr 13G? 3 1309 1310 cr 1313:r 1307 1308 c vt 1„v6 z 1_J� -cr � o N a o o o o o o IrjRMING CJSi TANTS PARK 1 4!+ N N N 444 N C1 N N N I B RriER TRA",S PARK 0--MCT.. r Z CHINKAPIN OAK DRI CHINKAPIN OAK DR c)o O y rj O O O O O N N O N l COp N � N p O E EUCLID AV N N 3" N VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT STREET AND ADDRESS MAP EC` STR 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET WHEELING TOWNSHIPEET MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS W.1/2 N.E.1 /4 Sec.25-42-1 1 (4 IS E.1 aw ok lr wnovc !nra kolur'Mr UTE; .ULr rt i DOAK*w BT- wA I $CN.L• V- 200' Dim Mr 93 Hourly Vehicle Counts Lama Ln (South of Tano Ln) Tano Ln (East of Lame Ln) From To 7/7/97 7/8/97 7/9/97 Average Entering 7/7/97 7/8/97 7/9/97 Average Entering (Mon) ue ed Cars Mon (Tue) !Med Cars 12:30 A.M. 1:30 A.M. N/A 0 3 2 1 N/A 1 7 4 2 1:30 A.M. 2:30 A.M. N/A 0 0 0 0 N/A 1 1 1 1 2:30 A.M. 3:30 A.M. N/A 1 0 1 0 N/A 1 1 1 1 3:30 A.M. 4:30 A.M. N/A 0 1 1 0 N/A 6 4 5 3 4:30 A.M. 5:30 A.M. N/A 4 3 4 2 N/A 4 5 5 2 5:30 A.M. 6:30 A.M. N/A 4 5 5 2 N/A 10 9 10 5 6:30 A.M. 7:30 A.M. N/A 9 8 9 4 N/A 26 25 26 13 7:30 A.M. 8:30 A.M. N/A 5 7 6 3 N/A 22 31 27 13 8:30 A.M. 9:30 A.M. N/A 4 3 4 2 N/A 31 32 32 16 9:30 A.M. 10:30 A.M. N/A 13 11 12 6 N/A 25 34 30 15 10:30 A.M. 11:30 A.M. N/A 7 10 9 4 N/A 23 17 20 10 11:30 A.M. 12:30 A.M. N/A 5 11 8 4 N/A 13 26 20 10 12:30 P.M. 1:30 P.M. 13 13 N/A 13 7 28 28 N/A 28 14 1:30 P.M. 2:30 P.M. 11 16 N/A 14 7 27 25 N/A 26 13 2:30 P.M. 3:30 P.M. 10 13 N/A 12 6 25 30 N/A 28 14 3:30 P.M. 4:30 P.M. 5 3 N/A 4 2 24 33 N/A 29 14 4:30 P.M. 5:30 P.M. 19 23 N/A 21 11 39 40 N/A 40 20 5:30 P.M. 6:30 P.M. 7 17 N/A 12 6 30 41 N/A 36 18 6:30 P.M. 7:30 P.M. 5 5 N/A 5 3 30 45 N/A 38 19 7:30 P.M. 8:30 P.M. 11 2 N/A 7 3 29 30 N/A 30 15 8:30 P.M. 9:30 P.M. 8 8 N/A 8 4 36 19 N/A 28 14 9:30 P.M. 10:30 P.M. 6 10 N/A 8 4 16 16 N/A 16 8 10:30 P.M. 11:30 P.M. 5 10 N/A 8 4 7 11 N/A 9 5 11.30 P.M. 12:30 A.M. 3 0 N/A 1 2 1 1 8 7 N/A 8 4 Vehicle Per Day 1 169 1 84 _ Vehicle Per Da 490 245 Hourly Vehicle Counts Tano Ln est of Lama Ln From To 7/7/97 Mon) 7/8/97 (Tue) 7/9/97 (Wed Average Entering Cars 12:00 A.M. 1:00 A.M. N/A 5 4 5 2 1:00 A.M. 2:00 A.M. N/A 1 4 3 1 2:00 A.M. 3:00 A.M. N/A 0 3 2 1 3:00 A.M. 4:00 A.M. N/A 3 3 3 2 :00 A.M. 5:00 A.M. N/A 4 4 4 2 5:00 A.M. 6:00 A.M. N/A 5 6 6 3 6:00 A.M. 7:00 A.M. N/A 20 15 18 9 7:00 A.M. 8:00 A.M. N/A 23 31 27 14 8:00 A.M. 9:00 A.M. N/A 22 28 25 13 9:00 A.M. 10:00 A.M. N/A 20 34 27 14 10:00 A.M. 11:00 A.M. N/A 37 26 32 16 11:00 A.M. 12:00 A.M. 15 20 23 19 10 12:00 A.M. 1:00 P.M. 22 25 30 26 13 1:00 P.M. 2:00 P.M. 31 29 N/A 30 15 2:00 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 26 26 N/A 26 13 3:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 26 28 N/A 27 14 4:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. 40 49 N/A 45 22 5:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. 40 39 N/A 40 20 6:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 52 45 N/A 49 24 7:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 26 28 N/A 27 14 8:00 P.M. 9:00 P.M. 40 23 N/A 32 16 9:00 P.M. 10:00 P.M. 25 19 N/A 22 11 10:00 P.M. 11:00 P.M. 20 23 N/A 22 11 11:00 P.M, 12:00 P.M. 7 9 N/A 8 4 Vehicle Per Diay 1 520 1 260 Hourly Vehicle Counts Lama Ln (North of Tano Ln Southbound From To 7/7/97 7/8/97 7/9/97 (Mon) (Tue) (Wed) Average7/7/97 (EB) Northbound 7/8/97 7/9/97 (Mon) (Tue (Wed Average B Total Entering Cars 0:00 A.M. 1:00 A.M. N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 A.M. 2:00 A.M. N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 A.M. 3:00 A.M. N/A 1 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 A.M. 4:00 A.M. N/A 1 1 1 N/A 0 0 0 1 1 4:00 A.M. 5:00 A.M. N/A 1 1 1 N/A 0 0 0 1 1 5:00 A.M. 6:00 A.M. N/A 3 1 2 N/A 1 2 2 4 2 6:00 A.M. 7:00 A.M. N/A 5 5 5 N/A 1 1 1 6 3 7:00 A.M. 8:00 A.M. N/A 1 6 7 7 N/A 5 6 6 12 6 8:00 A.M. 9:00 A.M. N/A 5 7 6 N/A 1 3 2 8 4 9:00 A.M. 10:00 A.M. N/A 6 3 5 N/A 5 2 4 8 4 10:00 A.M. 11:00 A.M. N/A 2 2 2 N/A 2 2 2 4 2 11:00 A.M. 12:00 A.M. 4 4 3 4 2 1 2 2 5 3 12:00 A.M. _ 1:00 P.M. 5 5 4 4 8 1 6 5 9 4 1:00 P.M. 2:00 P.M. 7 5 1 5 4 3 7 5 5 9 4 2:00 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 4 6 N/A 5 4 4 N/A 4 9 5 3:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 3 3 N/A 3 4 2 N/A 3 6 3 4:00 P.M. 5:00 P.M. 2 4 N/A 3 1 5 N/A 3 6 3 5:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. 8 3 N/A 6 3 9 N/A 6 12 6 6:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 10 8 N/A 9 4 3 N/A 4 13 6 7:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 6 6 8:00 P.M. 9:00 P.M. 2 4 N/A N/A 6 3 3 3 3 N/A 2 N/A 3 3 9 6 5 3 9:00 P.M. 10:00 P.M. 2 2 N/A 2 2 2 N/A 2 4 2 10:00 P.M. 11:00 P.M. 4 3 11:00 P.M. 12:00 P.M. I 0 0 N/A N/A 4 0 1 6 2 2 N/A 1 N/A 4 2 8 2 4 1 Vehicle Per Day 1 79 Vehicle Per Day 60 1 139 1 69 1 Street: Tano East /Rain WEat-he r: gE Direction: Date e 8/29/970 of Lama Totar 21 21-22 2 _w ___ 23-24 25-26 1 2 27-28 29 30°� -„ M-3435-36'37-38 2 1NUP 0 39-40 2 1 0 41-42 0 Over 42 0 8/29/97 16:00 16�21 2 2 4' 'f 3 0 0 0 0 0 8/29/97 8/29/97 8/29/97 8/29/97 8/29/97 17:00 1800 19:00 20:00 21:00 20 16 18 6 14 6 7 4 1 7 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 3 1 0 3 4 2 0 3 2 3' ^" 0 2 2 3 1 0'G 1 0 a 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/29/97 8/29/97 22:00 23:00 13 8 0 1 0 0 1 3 5 0 1 0 3 1`r. 0 1 0 1 0 1 0� 0 00 0 w_ 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 0:00 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 a 0 8/30/97 8/30/97 1:00 2:00 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 s 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 8/30/97 3:00 4:00 0 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i, 0 �` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 i 8/30/97 8/30/97 8/30/97 8/30/97 8/30/97 8/30/97 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 900 10:00 11:00 0 5 6 11 14 10 15 0 1 2 4 4 3 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 2 2 0 3 3 2 0" 0 0- 3'a ., 0 1"" 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 12:00 17 3 13 1 6 1 y ,, 2 3, 2 4 1 1 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 13:00 8/30/97 14:00 8/30/97 15:00 8/30/97 16:00 14 16 11 13 1 5 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 0 1 3 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 17:00 17 4 1 2 2 5 2 f 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8/30/97 18:00 10 2 1 0 0 0 2 2 8/30/97 19:00 11 3 0 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 20:00 8 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 21:00 6 2 1 0 0 2 1 `F 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 22:00 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 23:00 3 1 0 1 0 0 0� 0 8/31/97 8/31/97 8/31/97 0:00 1:00 2:00 1 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 ' 0 1 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 8/31/97 8/31/97 8/31/97 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 1 1 4 5 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0�0 0� 0 r 1a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 8:00 8 3 0 0 0 0 1� ` 0 0 1 0 0 0 8/31/97 9:00 11 1 0 1 1 0 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 8/31/97 10:00 10 1 1 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 8/31/97 11:00 12:00 15 17 6 6 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 4 4 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 13:00 7 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 14:00 11 — �. 1 1 ._..� ..a. 1 a. 1 2 rr„r ,+ 1 r 2 1 0 1 _. 0 0 8/31/97 15:00 11 6 2 0 1 1 0 1 g 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 16:00 15 7 3 2 —1-1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 17:00 12 6 2 2 �: �r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 18:00 18 11 1 2 ;s 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 19:00 7 3 2 0 $22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31 /97 20:00 4 2 —1-0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 21:00 10 1 1 2 1r 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 22:00 10 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 8/31/97 23:00 3 1 2 0 0 0 rr✓"� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 0:00 4 1 0 1 0 0 1 0, 0 0 00 0 0. 9/1/97 1:00 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0µW 9/1/97 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r^./ 0 0 0 0 ol 0 9/1/97 4:00 2 2 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 5:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 6:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 7:00 5 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 8:00 7 1 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 9:00 9 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 9/1/97 10:00 9 3 0 2 3 0 00 1 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 11:00 9 2 1 0 0 1 2�* 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1 /97 12:00 10 1 2 2 1 2 1r 1 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 13:00 13 2 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1 /97 14:00 11 4 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 9/1/97 15:00 7 1 0 0 4 1 1� 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 16:00 7 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 17:00 20 7 1 1 6 1 3 0 0 0 0 00 _v 9/1/97 18:00 10 4 1 2 0 1 0, , d 0 0 0 0 0 9/1 /97 19:00 16 3 5 2 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 20:00 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 a 0 9/1/97 21:00 7 2 1 0 0 2° 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 22:00 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 23:00 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 °, 0 1 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 1� 0 ar�r" 0 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 y�i 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 r �r 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 3:00 2 1 0 1 0 0 �� 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 4:00 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 9/2/97 5:00 5 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 6:00 12 2 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 7:00 14 3 0 0 1 3 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 TOTAL 720 204 59 61 88 96 85 33 21 9 4 2 3 85% Speed Street: Tano E of Lama WEather: Clear/Rain _ew.... .~Direction w. WB ...... D ate Time Totai 1-20 21-22 23-2425-26 27-28,. 31-32 33-34 35=3 6 37-38 39-40 41-42 Over 42 8/29/97 15:00 23 4 2 6 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 8%29/97 16:00 23 9 1 1 3 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0- 0 0 8/29/97 17:00 20 10 2 1 5 ,� 0 0 8/29/97 18:00 23 6 3 5 5 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 8/29/97 19:00 14 4 4 1 0 1"� 3 0 00 0 0 0 8/29/97 20:00 10 6 1 0 1 1 r�0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8/29/97 21:00 17 9 2 2 4 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/29/97 22:00 6 2 3 0 O 1 a 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 8/29/97 23:00 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8/30/97 0:00 4 1 0 0 0. 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 3:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 8/30/97 4:00 5:00 0 2 4 —0-0---0 0 , 0� 00 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 6:00 2 1 0 0 0 0" 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 7:00 11 5 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 8:00 11 4 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 9:00 8 4 1 0 0 1rF0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W-8/30/97 10:00 12 5 1 2 0 3�a��� 1 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 11:00 9 4 0 2 2 1�. 0 8/30/97 12:00 15 3 2 5 0 2! 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 13:00 11 4 3 1 2 0, 1 8/30/97 14:00 11 6 0 1 1 2 f 0 i° 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 15:00 11 6 1 2 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 16:00 17 6 1 4 1 0 8/30/97 17:00 9 3 1 0 0 2�i'• 0 l 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 18:00 14 6 1 2 0 30A 8/30/97 19:00 9 2 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 20:00 11 5 1 0 3 0 1 8/30/97 21:00 7 4 0 1 0 ',,. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/30/97 22:00 5 3 0 1 0 0 8/30/97 23:00 6 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 0:00 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31 /97 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -� 0 1 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 3:00 3 3 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31 /97 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 --6/-31/97 5:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 6:00 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 7:00 4 2 0 0 2 hh�'.^. 0 ,� 0 8/31/97 8:00 9 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8/31/97 9:00 13 4 0 2 3 2; 0 8/31/97 10:00 9 6 0 2 0 0 .;° "' 1 8/31/97 11:00 11 5 1 0 3 2 0 �' 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 12:00 12 4 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 13:00 18 8 1 3 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 14:00 12 6 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 15:00 16 12 1 0 3 0 "'� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31 /97 16:00 9 --5-7 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 0 8/31 /97 17:00 6 6 0 0 0 0 ';, 0 0 6--o 0 0 0 8/31 /97 18:00 9 5 I 1 1 1 1 � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 19:00 11 5 4 2 0 CF 0 8/31/97 20:00 11 9 0 1 0o 0 0 0 0 0 00 __ _.. 8/31 /97 21:00 5 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 22:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8/31/97 23:00 4 1 1 1 1� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 0:00 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 100 3 2 0 0 0 fil 1 0 0 0 0 0 __..0 ..0... 9/1/97 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1 /97 3:00 0 0 0 0 0_ 09,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 4:00 1 0 0 0_._ " 0 i �0 0 �. 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o o 0 o 0 o 9/1/97 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 6:00 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 7:00 3 1 1 0 0 .� 1 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 9/1/97 8:00 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/l/97 9:00 6 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 10:00 17 5 2 2 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 9/1 /97 11:00 9 3 3 1 0 ���� 1 �a�n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1%97 12:00 8 3 1 0 0 0 yrs„ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 13:00 18 4 3� 1 3 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 14:00 10 2 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 o o 0 9/1 /97 15:00 7 5 0 1 0 0 '��� �� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 16:00 11 4 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 17:00 9 5 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 18:00 8 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9/1/97 19:00 9 4 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 20:00 5 0 1 0 1 1 S 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 21:00 4 0 0 0 1 0,�"; 0 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/1/97 22:00 4 1 0 1 1 1, 0 9/1/97 23:00 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 �� 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 9/2/97 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9/2/97 4:00 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 9/2/97 5:00 1 1 0 0 0 (T-11111,1"' 0 9/2/97 6:00 0 9/2/97 7:00 11 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 o O o o 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 '* 10 9 3 6 0 2 TOTAL 652 267 72 78 71 63 26 .���° 85% Speed Street: Lama North of Tano WEather: Clear Direction Northbound S P E E D (mph) Date Time Total 1-20 21-2223-24 2526:27-28 29-30 31-32 33-34135-36 37-38 39-40 41-42 Over 42 7/7/97 11:00 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 12:00 8 2 1 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7/7/97 13:00 3 1 2 0'. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 14:00 4 2 2 0 .:;: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 15:00 4 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 16:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 17:00 3 2 0 0 # ,. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 18:00 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 19:00 3 0 1 1>< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 20:00 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 21:00 2 1 1 1 0 # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 22:00 6 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 23:00 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 0:00 0 0 0 0 €3 .; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 1:00 0 0 0 0 $ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 2:00 0 0 0 0»># 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 3:00 0 0 0 0 „%, :r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 1 5:00 1 0 0 0 ..:: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 6:00 1 1 0 0 €1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 7:00 5 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 8:00 1 0 0 1 €1<< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 9:00 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 10:00 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 11:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 12:00 1 0 0 1 ::$; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 13:00 7 5 0 1 '`>< 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 14:00 4 3 1 0 f w"s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 15:00 2 1 1 0 �, i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 16:00 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 17:00 9 6 2 0 F,� 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 1 18:00 3 1 0 0 =`'=2[>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 19:00 3 3 0 0 >£< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 20:00 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 21:00 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 22:00 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 23:00 1 1 1 0 0s0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 2:00 0 0 0 0 `.0 ': 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 3:00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 7/9/97 5:00 2 1 0 0 si3<`>< 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 6:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 7:00 6 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 8:00 3 2 1 0 ;, 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 9:00 2 0 2 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 10:00 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 11:00 2 2 0 0 Vii:::::>< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 12:00 --6—T 2 2 1 €i 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 13:00 S 2 2 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 131 73 21 iii± 3 3 3 4 1 0 0 0 1 85th % Speed Street: Lama North of Tano WEat Clear Directio Southbound S P E E D (mph) Date Time Total 1�20i 21-22 23-24 25-26 27-28 29-30 31-32 33-34 35-36 37-38 39-40 41-42 Over 42 7/7/97 11:00 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 12:00 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 13:00 7 1` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 14:00 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 15:00 3 _; 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 16:00 2 s, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 17:00 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78197 18:00 10 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 19:00 6,t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 20:00 2'�„r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 21:00 2 �f ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 22:00 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/7/97 23:00 0 G i; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 2:00 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/971 3:00 1'„ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 5:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 6:00 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 7:00 6 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 8:00 5 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 1 7/8/97 9:00 6,r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 10:00 2„ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 11:00 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 12:00 5 s,°� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 13:00 5 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 14:00 6 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 15:00 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 16:00 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 17:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 18:00 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 19:00 6 r s, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 20:00 4 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 21:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 22:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/8/97 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 0:00 0 ;;fit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 2:00 0 }. , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 3:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 4:00 1 ;,” 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 5:00 1 �,,� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 7/9/97 6:00 5 „ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 7:00 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 8:00 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 9:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 10:00 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 11:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7/9/97 12:a0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 7/9/97 13:00 5 r: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 178 $74::> 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 85th % Speed