The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2969_001MINUTES`� THE REGULAR"MEETING OF MAYO] k`,r-', BOARD OF TRUSTEES -OF T, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT February 21, 1-984 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Mayor Krause called the meeting to order at 8.00 P.M. INVOCATION INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Farley - ROLL CALL ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor,Carolyn H. Krause Trustee Gerald Farley Trustee Norma Murauskis Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Theordore Wattenberg Absent: Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Flores APPROVAL OF MINUTES APPROVE MINUTES Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held February 7, 1984. Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Wattenberg Krause Pass: Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS APPROVE BILLS Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund 391,694.58 Revenue Sharing Fund 8,895.86 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 13,900.30 Community Development Block Grant 18,223.15 .Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 5,539.57 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund: Operations & Maintenance 101,163.01 Depreciation,Irnprovement,Ext(.,,nsi-on 77,960.43 Parking System Revenue Fund 684.64 Risk Management Fund 95,451.42 Capital Improvement, Repair or Replacement Fund 97.85 Special Service Area #4 590.45 Contractors Surety & Sidewalk 100.00 Trust Fund 400.00 $715,101.26 Upon roll- call.: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved APPROVE FINANCIAL to accept the financial report dated January 31, 1984, REPORT subject to audit. Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried.. Page One COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD JAYCEES Charles Sears, representing the Mount Prospect Jaycees, WAIVE FEES requested the Village waive the fees usually connected with conducting carnivals,stating the the Jaycees annual carnival will be held at the Mount Prospect Plaze May 23 through May 28, 1984, inclusive. Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved. to waive the fees for the Mount Prospect Jaycees carnival during May, 1.984. Upon roll call: Ayes: Nays Motion carried. Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg None MAYOR'S REPORT ,n, -,r residents and PROCLAIM: mayor Krause read a proclamatioti ur gj' PROSPECT civic organizations tO SU1,3P01"t the Prospect High Sch(.,�ol H.S. MARCHING Blue Knights fund raising efforts in order to attend BAND the exhibition in Knoxville, Tennessee. This trip is to acknowledge the fact that the Prospect Marching Band has been selected as one of the,12 best bands in the United States, Linda Markay gave a brief explanation. of the events leading up to this honor and explained that a fund raising campaign is underway. Mayor. Krause expressed the good wishes of the Village Board and community as well as congratulations on the honor. LITIGATION: A proposed settlement was presented involving the law HUNTZICKER suit Huntzicker vs. Village. This case, initiated in (WILLE ST 1-980, involves property located on the east side of , & KENSINGTON) Wille Street at Kensington. The two lots include one with zoning R-1 and one with B-3 zoning. The petitioner wanted both lots B-3 stating it was his Cesire to develop a small shopping center at that location. The Village contended the Comprehensive Plan called for that parcel to be developed in the R-1 residential district. The proposed settlement involves having both lots zoning R-1 and that any necessary variations will. be granted by the Village without the necessary public hearings, as well as having a plat prepared subdivided the lots. Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to approve the proposed settlement as stated. Upon roll call-: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Mary Burger, homeowner immediately south of the subject property, expressed her appreciation to the Village for retaining the residential. character of the neighborhood. LIQUOR A request had. been received from the new owners of LICENSE: the Monterey Whaling Village, 999 N. Elmhurst Road, for a Class "S" liquor license. 'j1he present owners of MONTEREY this restaurant hold a Class "S" liquor license. WHALING VILLAGE The Vill-age Board acknowledged the request and granted CLASS "S" the Class "S" -liquor license. OLD BUSINESS An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would VACATION accompany the plat of vacation, approved at the last OF' ROADWAY February 21, 1.984 Page Two meeting of the Village Board, being Waverly Street extended, at Lincoln. Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved ORD.N0-3397 for passage of Ordinance No. 3397 AN ORDINANCE VACATING A CERTAIN ROADWAY IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (WAVERLY EXTENDED AT LINCOLN STREET) Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg' Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMEND CH. 18 amend the Traffic Code, Chapter 18, by deleting the (Taxi Cab reference of a taxi cab stand on Prospect Avenue, between Stand) Emerson and Main Streets, and place a 2 hour parking restriction at that location. Trustee Wattbnberg, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Wattenberg/ seconded by Trustee Farley, Moved for passage of Ordinance No. 3399 ORD.NO.3398 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 1-A-84, Text Amendment AMEND CH. 14 An ordinance was presented for first reading that would ZBA 1-A-84 amend Chapter 14, Zoning Ordinance, and delete the Court Reporte requirement for an official transcript to be taken by a court reported at all public hearings before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: ,Fatley;,,�,," Mtrauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved for ORD.N0-3399 Page Three February 21, 1984 passage of ordinance No. 3399 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED ZONING OF THE VILLAGE CODE CF MOUNT PROSPECT TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT' FOR A COURT REPORTER TO TRANSCRIBE ZONING PROCEDURES Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 4-Z-84 ZBA 4-Z-84, 5 -SU -84 and 6-V-84, 2000 S. Elmhurst Road 5 -SU -84 The following Ordinances were presented for first 6-V-84 readings. These ordinances granted B-4 zoning, 2000 S. a special use in the nature of a planned unit ELMHURST RD. development (providing for 5 one --story buildings) and specified variations for the property to be used as an automotive care facil-ity at 2000 S. Elmhurst Road: AN ORDINANCE ZONING THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ELMHURST ROAD PLAZA IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE ELMHURST ROAD PLAZA WITH A SPECIAL USE OF SUCH DEVELOPMENT FOR AUTOMOTIVE RELATED USES ONLY AND WITH CERTAIN VARIATIONS FROM THE REGULATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT These ordinances will be presented March 6th for 2nd readings. FACADE PROGRAM A proposal was presented for architectural services PLANNING for the Facade Rebate Program. This program involves design guidelines for certain store fronts in the RESOURCES,INC. downtown area for the upgrading appearances. This program will be under the direction of the Business Development and Re -Development Commission and the Department of Community Development. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved to accept the proposal for architectural services submitted by Planning Resources, Inc. for the facade rebate program., Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Murauskis,,Van Geem, WattenbExg Nays: None Motion carried. The following ordinances were presented for f:Lxst readings. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ApTICLE XXVIII ENTITLED "VENDORS, SOLICITORS, TCBACOD_DEALFRS AND OTHERS EN�AGED IN RETAIL SERVI(_--S" OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE CODE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE III ENTITLED "TRESPASS" OF CHA?TER 23 OF THE VILLAGE CODE -1 11 1 • 1113, Mel -A I MW 0 to) 1j 01,1:4 VMKO) M&MR-11 U ON WAWOJ = N' P MTA I M RVITURNME OJ These ordinances will be presented March 6th for 2nd readings. February 21, 1984 Page Four VILLAGE MANAGER'S P--ORT vi-liage Manager Te' ce L. Burghard noted I nothing to report. ad NEW BUSINESS ZBA 3-V-84, 1590 S. Busse Road Mr- Leo Straton presented his request for variations *for property located at the northwest corner of Busse Road and Dempster. The variations include reduced front and rear yards, eliminate a designated truck loading space and to reduce the number of parking spaces from the required 32 to 28. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the front and rear yard variations but recommended denial Of the truck loading and reduced parking variations. It was noted that the existing site is a vacant gas station, having been vacant for approximately 5 years, and that the proposed fast food restaurant would enhance the neighborhood. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved to grant the variations being the subject of ZBA 3-V-84. Upon roll call: Ayes: Parley, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be Presented at the March 6th meeting for first reading. ZBA 3-V-84 1590 S. BUSSE ROAD An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMEND CH.13 amend Chapter 13, Placing certain requirements on establishments holding liquor licenses relative to the conduct allowed. This Ordinance will be presented March 6th for second reading. ADJOURNMENT Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved ADJOURN to adjourn the meeting. , Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:29 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page Five February 21, 19, 634,668.13 $ 343,951.20 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION FEBRUARY 29, 1984 Beginning Disbursements Cash & Invest. Balance (per attached Balance Feb. 16, 1984 Receipts List of Bills) Feb. 29, 1984 General Fund $ 106,227.42 $ 179,123.20 $ 152,772.74 $ 132,577.88 Revenue Sharing Fund 42,249.61 - 3,734.37 38,515.24 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 585,450.12 71,003.25 7,572.38 648,880.99 Community Development Block Grant 6,019.74 - 3,860.89 2,158.85 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 38,585.97 9,868.03 14,382.98 34,071.02 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund: Operations & Maintenance 518,605.67 121,297.99 106,004.32 533,899.34 Depreciation, Improvement & Extension 65,400.00 - 789.47 64,610.53 Parking System Revenue Fund 71,112.32 5,081.06 401.51 75,791.87 Risk Management Fund - 211,030.41 24,049.10 186,981.31 Captial Improvement, Repair or Replacement Fund 474,036.63 10,987.52 30,183.44 454,840.71 Contractors Surety & Sidewalk 30,774,00 900.00 100.00 31,574.00 Trust Fund 323,173.87 25,396.67 100.00 348,470.54 634,668.13 $ 343,951.20 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS AMOCO OIL COMPANY MARC & CATHY BLOOM S. HOWARD BOLL BRUCE & JANIS FORSTER 1LLAGHER BASSETT INSURANCE SERVICE ITERGOVERNMENTAL RISK MGMT AGENCY MAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE DARYL MERRILL MARLIN NEUROTH RAMAN PATEL PETTY CASH - MANAGEMENT SERVICES FRED THYGESEN CLEARING ACCOUNTS GENERAL FUND CONTRACTOR'S SURETY & SIDEWALK VILLAGE MANACERAS OFFICE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/84 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL REGULAR GASOLINE 870349.74 87*349.744 LANDLORD/TENANT ORD. OVERPAYMENT 87.00 87.00 BOND REFUND B-423 $100.00 8100.00 LANDLORD/TENA-NT ORD. OVERPAYMENT $7.00 87.0 SERVICE FEE 1ST INSTALLMENT 849270.00 549270.00* DEDUCTIBLE LOSSES JAN.'84 BILLING 829"94.25 820594.25 REPAIRS TO POLICE VEHICLE P -b 8267.00 jU N BOWMAN REPAIRS TO POLICE VEHICLE P-15 8148.00 8415100 LANDLORD/TENANT ORD. OVERPAYMENT 87.00 S7.00 LANDLORD/TENANT ORD. OVERPAYMENT 17.00 57400 LANDLORD/TENANT ORD. OVERPAYMENT $28.00 828.00 TRAVELo SUPPLIES 58.00 TRAVEL. SUPPLIES 820.00 TRAVEL,p SUPPLIES $5.00 33.00* BOND REFUND B-398 8100.00 BIDo. 00 ***TOTAL** 8'_=_4.917.9? 87.853.74 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $6*864.25 8100.00 TRUST BUND sloo .00 A FR CA° ! -STITUTE OF CERTIFIED PLA WORKSHOP REGISTRATION -j. ROWMAN 8300.00 $300.00* 3 L H 1NOWSTRIES DRAFTING SUPPLIES %22.04: POSTERS. FORMAT- KROY TAPE 5143.73 BUDGE? POSTERS 871.25 $247.27 jU N BOWMAN WORKSHGP EXPENSES S120.00 S12C.00 THF CENTER FOR URBAN POLICY RESEARC REFERENCE BOOK THE FORMS GROUP FORMS 5-a�_ $95.05 $95.905 £958s�5 VILLAGE MANAGERS OFFICE CARL L. GARDNER E ASSOCIATES INC. IBM ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS PAT KIMBALL TRAVEL• INC. LITTLEJOHN: GLASS L YOWELL. LTD. NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - MANAGEMENT SERVICES VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE GENERAL FUND FINANCE DEDAR$ yN$ THE FORMS GROUP VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2.1,29184 ZONING LITIGATION MEMORY TYPEWRITER MARCH •84 CHG. IL. MUNICIPAL LEAGUE HANDBOOKS SEMINAR REGISTRATION-O.JEPSON AIRFARE LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED OFFICE SUPPLIES TRAVEL. SUPPLIES TRAVELS SUPPLIES TRAVEL• SUPPLIES TRAVEL• SUPPLIES PAGE 2 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $19731.53 $19731.53 $46.00 346800 $24.00 $24.00* 565.00 $65.00 $180.00 s180s $2v2Z5.00 $29225. $11.72 $11.72 $82.31 $8.18 $13.74 $26.50 3131.23: NOTAL*4t S5* _ 1 . VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/34 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $7.309.53 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE r�THWEST STATIONERS INC. ..DOCK PUBLICATIONS PETTY CASH - MANAGEMENT SERVICES PUf3LIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. A.R. SCHMIDT C ASSOCIATES V C G PRINTERS INC. XEROX CORPOR4TTO`3 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE GENERAL FUND RISK MANAGEMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES LEGAL PAGE NOTICE TRAVEL• SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SURVEY C SUBDIVISION PLAT PLATES MADE NEWSLETTER PLATES MADE XEROX COPIER JAN. CNG. $633.43 REVENUE SHARING FUNGI $6.98 $34.65 32.5r* $79.30 $350.00 $201.60 5160.00 51835.23 42.1.3=0 ,ALL AGPER PAS SET i TNSURANCE SERV TCW SERVICE FFE N ENT .` ALL Au_ OF M.P.EmPLOYEF HEALTH BENE COVER EMPLOYEE H_ice H BF:. FT_ -i riCK �tc4 ..�� i8.644.85 -- RISK 6X4.85RISK MANA NT RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 31 ,P-84. 5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2./29/84 W�V VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER ROBERT T. LASSIE THE DOCTORS EMERGENCY OFFICENTER GREAT LACES EIRE EQUIPMENT HONEY BEE SNACK SHOP INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES COR ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. KALE. UNIFOPMS PAT KIMBALL TRAVEL. TNC. KREST CUzrnM _ ILORS9 INC. INU E AN PRESS NOP;; ;T MUL 3 REGINN i PETTY CAST MANAGEMENT SRV -CES 3ECI O3 . -CF SUP -PLIES INC. GFOPGF ST 1_1 . VEP 3_NC ON RBER CO� EQ• X CORPOIRATTON KEYS METAL PARTS TRAINING EXPENSES PRE-EMPLOYMFNT EXAMS SPOTLIGHT% BRACKET PRISONER FOOD FEB.'84 IBM COPIER III PURCHASE IBM COPIER !II PURCHASE IBM COPIER III PURCHASE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE SILVER NA E E -=S IPE ARE UN'PGqM CLOTWTN CARDS PRINTFn TEA_N=N`. COURSE TR VEC9 S"OPCIES OPFICE SUPPLIES TRAENING _EXPENSES WASHERS- WIPER BLADES PVA„ ICr S37.09 $3-1.09 $303.93 $3013.93 $287.60 $237.60 554.00 S54a00 S120. -4 S129 S56.30 56 0500 S200.00 $'.70 0.00 I tu0 S&27.94 $44.20 S79.49 762.'=3 S27.40 290.00 II_.II -- y, TZ1 5_ y_ - �P�GI VENDOR FIRE C EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. AL BAR - WILMETTE PLATERS ARLINGTON ENGINE REBUILDERS IN(4 `- MDNWEALTH EDI:SON DECISION DATA COMPUTER CORP. GERRI OELBOCCI.' THE FORMS GROUP FREJRIKSEN u SONS JOHN GIBSON C°,DO3YEAR SERVICE STORES GREAT LAKES SIRE EQUIPMENT 'SALE FIRE PUMP COMPANY !HE HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP "ENROTIN HOSPITAL JAMES HILLIGER .NTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES COR INGIS SELL TELEPHONE CO. 5_INOTS FIRE CHIEFS FOUNDATION DATION ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUC K ='. R PRODUCTS I tit. . '-.Ly nOVICES- INC. MC C -RTY I iRE EQUIPMENT HEIGHTS Air OMC aVE SUPPLY TPP MAVIONaL F Est_ WWr ARSON DEPORT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/84 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL AUTOLIFT FOR STATION 92 liv558.00 $3WO.00 STRIP RUST C REPAINTv REFINISH HUBS $100.00 $100.00 NEW HEAD C VALVE ,JOB 1523 5307.00 %307.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICE $13.24 ELECTRICAL SERVICE $6.69 ELECTRICAL SERVICE $6.62 526.55 MAINTENANCE -CRT a RRINTER FEB.484 $6 00 PRINTER i FEEDER FEB.184 CHG. S58.00 SL 19.0`? INSTRUCTORS FEE 2/a-10,15-17,22-3/2 $400.00 0.00 OISKETT=S 513:0.50 5130.50 HYDRO AIR. PAKSf PARTS 025.15 5125.15 TRAINING EXPENSES $35.00 *35.00 TIRES $103..0 5103.70 POWER INVERTER S381.01 T381.01 CHANGE OVER VALVESv SEAL. KITS S87.00 SR7.0 , jR. FIRE MARSHALL HELMETS 514.0C $14.00 DEPARTMENT PHYSICALS S850.00 saco.00 TRA C N II G EXPENSES $119.25 slid.25 iRM COPAR III PURL I SSE SPOO.00 19M COPIER III „ RCTAS; $600.00 SI1500.00 T=LEFACINE SERVICE $134.41 T' LEPHONE SERVICE $328.89 TVLEI-°I-GPik_ SERVICE %28.49 0 LEPHONE. SERVICE ` 162.33 L EPr NE SFRVIC. EIRE OFFICER III '(ONUS v$ . IFS N- S!50 00 $ RG. ,_. - MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS SEMINAR WUDLLET`=: E S70.r.0 S70 aG_. RUST PROOFING SY. T& i _a. .0 . Ps ,ERVICES R' NDFRED 2/6-7/84 1111.25 S131.25 H. SE_ WITH HEAL .eUPLTNGS 1628.00 s.; 8.08 `-BUILT ALTERNI Tc,'R, PRIMER " OTOR $150.00 1190.01) MISC. SPARE PARTS 1359.24 GUNK SiQI6 S323,40 SUBSCRIPT -JON $24.0 S24.&Y: OFFICE SUPPLIES 637.72 137.72 TRAVEL; SUPPLIES S42.76, VENDOR EIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT* PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS PHOTO T W R N. .E$ RESEARCH INS TS OF AMERICA SCHOLASTIC E. s SUPPLY9 INC. SONY INDUSTRIES T AC O 0,1L ULRET-H. -INTERS !NC - DEAN E VONDRAN i-= -apR-,---'_,'i` '} _Tia.T� VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/84 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION TRAVEL. SUPcLTES TRAVEL -9 SUP PL1ES TRAVEL? SPPL-Es TRA -Lt SUPPL1 TRAVED� SUPPLIES TRAVEL, SUPOLT-- pHOTCGRAPHY EQUTPAENTI <e` PASA T RIElS RFPAIRE _I -A -T _RIES SHOESWORK MICIR OCASSE T TES F -IRE STN. €3 RSI? -l" ADDIT.D = TRAINTNG XPENS'sS SUSINESS CARDS EOk s PRINTED NSTRtIC MRS PEC -10.15-1-7,02-3/2 ND b', _ F -UN INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL 514.52 59.4L* a e¢-0 z' .o S2.36i 530,00 S36.00 S760.Gj S -76 $27-66c'.10 S27,6E 7g0 5 6T,S rf HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES ILLINOIS ARC PETTY CASH - MANAGEMENT SERVICES HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/84 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL REFUSE PICK-UP FEB.184 DUES, NEWSLETTER -SUBSCRIPTION TRAVEL, SUPPLIES TRAVEL, SUPPLIES TRAVEL• SUPPLIES TRAVEL. SUPPLIES TRAVEL, SUPPLIES $86,729.69 PAGE 7 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $869577.82 $86,577.82 $10.00 $10.00 $37.33 $1.50 SENICR CITIZEN CAB RIDES $14.04 113.50 SENIOR CITIZEN CAB RIDES $75.50 $141.87'= ***TOTAL-** 3¢6,729.64 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION S TRANSPORTATION COMPANY SENIOR CITIZEN CAP RIDES $328.05 SENICR CITIZEN CAB RIDES $407.70 SENIOR CITIZEN CAB RIDES $188.80 $19124.55 \ILLINOIS EEL= TELEPHONE CO. TELFPHONE SERVICE $234.38 $29.35 $264.23 TELEPHONE SERVICE RELY 'OFFICE MACHINES IBM SELECTRIC TYPEWRITER $820.00 S820.00 .ABLE SPRINGHOUSE BOOK COMPANY NURSES €R UG HANDBOOK $18.62 $i8.6 '.**TOTAL*, f2e22 .40 fg_ES DIVISION HUMAN GENERAL FUND $2,227.40 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMPNT DEPARTMENT AMM !CAN PLAMNING ASSOCIATION PLANNIN(-, A-CIVISLDRY SERVTCEi 9INDER $321,00 $322.00 VENDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BERKEY CAMERA SHOP BRIM/BRAUN ASSOCIATES THE FORMS GROUP ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND NORTHWEST COMMUNITY SERVICES? INC. NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PADDEN E COMPANY* INC.?AGENT PLANNING RESOURCES INC. VAN DOORN ROOFING COMPANY VILLAGE OF HOMEWOOD VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/84 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION FILM PROCESSING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES RENDERED COMPUTER SUPPLIES IMRF PAYMENT FOR FEB.084 FICA PAYMENT FOR PAY OF 2/16/84 SUPPORTIVE SERVICES JAN.'84 OFFICE CALCULATOR OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE EQUIPMENT MARCH184 CHG. SUPPORT STAFF -FACADE IMPROVEMENT PGM DECK REPAIR -FIRE STN.1`2 PHOTOS OF HOMEWOOD REVITALIZATION PGM PAGE 8 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $2.52 $2.52 5500.00 $500.00 $112.08 $112.08 $151.54 $85.84 $237.3 $825.00 $825.0(- $127.96 $22.80 $63.19 $211.15 $196.81 $196.81 $500.00 1500.00 $1,260.00 $13260.00 $18.72 $18.72 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $4,185.66 GENERAL FUND $324.77 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GT $3060.89 STREET DIVISION ACTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CORP ALL TILE? INC. ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY G.W. BERKHEIMER CO. BERRY BEARING CO BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT BUSINESS OFFICE SYSTEMS BUSSE HARDWARE JANITORIAL SERVICES FEB.184-3 BLDGS. JANITORIAL SERVICE -VILLAGE HALL 2/84 SAFETY DESIGN TREADS CAM LOCK? CAM* RINGS? KEYS DEVICE REPAIR ENTRANCE-V.HALL KEY DUPLICATED RIVET PACK CHAIN* LINKS METAL PARTS EQUIPMENT PIECE PARTITIONS MISC. HARDWARE $1?155.00 $19265.00 $2,420.00 $98.48 $98.48 $17.20 $50.00 $5.00 $72.20 $13.97 $13.97 $22.80 $22.80 $368.23 $368.23 $159.40 x159.40 $1,244.00 51.244.00 $17.27 $17.27 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2!.29/84 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT STREET DIVISION CADE INDUSTRIES CENTER FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT R.L. CORTY E COMPANY DEANS CONCRETE SPECIALTIES =LTRONQ INC. LAGS UNLIMITED* INC. FLNIST PRODUCTS FOREST TREE SERVICEt INC. •, We Wo GRAINGER MC* HARPER COLLEGE ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK & EQUIPMENT CO NELS J. JOHNSON OONALO MAY MERCHANTS PUBLISHING COMPANY IOTO N PRAKF AND ELECTRIC M=ONTGOMCRY ELEVATOR COMPANY MORTON THIC)KOL, INC. ROMAN HRYCZKO NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PETTY CASH .p MANAGEMENT SERVICES ETTy ASH _ PUBLIC WOO S aCHN SAKASH CO==MPANY9 10. S T U <Ek COOPWATION CLEANING SUPPLIES 5640.75 TOXIC SUBSTANCES SEMINAR -2 S160.00 STEAM CLEANER REPAIRED $97.50 ADJUSTING RINGS S14I.00 HACKSAW? BLADESe RETAINERS S104.50 U.S. FLAGS $169.25 U.S. FLAGS $169.25 U.S. FLAGS 5I9.25 U.S. FLAGS S16Q.?5 GARDENING SUPPLIES 5316.44 TREE REM"AL SERVICES 5650.00 WIPER PIVOT ASSYv WIPER ARM $72.50 RUBBER HOSE 525.87 RUBBER HOSE $25.87 RUBBER HOSE S29.B7 MAINTENANCE PAVEMENT SEMINAR -4 S56.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS &413.34 PARKWAY TREE TRIMmING $2000.10 SAFETY SHOE ALLOWANCE $50.00 REFERENCE MATERIAL $75.00 FRT.CHG..REFERENCE MATERIAL 53.5€0 VOLTAGE RFGULATnR $41.78 EeEVATOR REPAIR 5145.95 ROCK SALT $3v416.09 SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES FOR DEC .0 jAN. $600.00 GAS SERUCE $ *517.36 LAMPS S31.58 TRAVELS SUPPLIES $2.25 TRAVELv SUPPLIES $24.00 TRAVEL, SUPPLIES 55.23 TRAVELv SUPPLIES $18.45 TRAVELv SUPPLIES 53.55 TRAVELt SUPPLIES $7.44 TRAVEL$ SUPPLIES $.50 WINCH -HOIST t I8.00 UNIFORM EMBROItDFR.FO PATCHES $285.00 VENDOR STREET DIVISION TURF WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS WASHINGTON RUBBER CO. STREET DIVISION GENERAL FUND MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2129184 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION TURFGRASS DISEASES REFERENCE BOOK ALUM. STOP SIGN BLANKS COMPRESSION FITTING INVOICE AMOUNT $15.00 $255.00 529.00 ***TOTAL* $119740.90 REVENUE SHARING FUND $39671.09 CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND PAGE 10 TOTAL 515.00* SZ55.00 $29.00 $169876.7 51,022.44 $442.34 -, �.�.'-:4;X1. ;t�#,t#.'th=.tv��4=:c"-rte'.`-�-'Yr�'v� ��t'.tih..+i�'t:4'�r=i=r'+=v:n=.': �F :cv�i �tr'�"-'> `i +��=�t #fi=r r�`�=####:��`e�#2't hv� v##��'�'.x�r`�T`r��Y`r �k#i•�. Yr �, it '�.•'',�' ��Y Y`�'.�i`.• WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ALEXANDER CHEMICAL CORP. BADGER METER INC BEARING DISTRIBUTORS• INC. BERKEY CAMERA SHOP BERRY BEARING CO BLAIR TEMPORARIES BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER CITY UNIFORMS COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMMONWEALTH EDISON CONTINENTAL IL.NAT.BANK&TRUST OF CH R.L. CORTY & COMPANY W. W. GRAINGER INC. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. LIQUID CHLORINE WATER METERS SHAFT FILM PROCESSING GEARS SECRETARIAL SERVICE SECRETARIAL SERVICE METAL PARTS PARKAS ELECTRICAL ENERGY FOR WELL PUMPS ELECTRICAL SERVICE VILLAGE SHARE WATER SUPPLY-FEB.184 STEAM CLEANER REPAIRED EX.FAN WIMOTOR MOTOR. BELTS STORAGE BINS9 PRESS GAUGES CONN. AUTO SUMP PUMP TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE $783.13 $7.027.80 $13.50 $2.52 $8.96 $336.00 $336.00 5190.30 $119.85 $58.284.29 $12.74 $28,439.00 $97.50 $645.42 $109.01 $169.93 $138.44 513.83 $359.59 $14.80 S783.13 $79027.80 $13.50 52.57 S8.9t $672.00 $190.30 $119.85 $581284.29 $12.74 x28,439.007 $97.50 $1,062.80 VENDOR }CATER AND SEWER DIVISION ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK C EQUIPmENI T CO. ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND LEWIS INTERNATIONAL INC, MCCINN CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES CO NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS C0- 1LIARSS CriNTRACTURS EQMT. LF _/IFPOLYMPIA n0lGE OF 0"S PLAIMS9 !NC. - PETTY S: 1STMOFTER MT PROSPECT SEARS- ROEBU.... AND C.O. SPRING LLIGN WINKELI-NS RADIATOR CO. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE Il ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/84 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL TELEPHONE SERVICE 5433.14 TELEPHONE SERVICE $34.28 TELEPHONE SERVICE %15.33 TELEPHONE SERVICE 517.77 TELEPHONE SERVICE SlAe17 TELEPHONE SERVICE S14.73 TELEPHONE SERVICE 127.40 TELEPHONE SERVICE %18.89 TELEPHONE SERVICE S45.18 $IvOI 2.5? CURE 4UARDS 5421.0C CURB GUAROS $130.32 $551.32 lmRF PAYMENT FOR. FEB.984 QM08.48 FICA PAYMENT FOR PAY `?F 2/16/84 S1,146.99 S4055.07' CABLE 574.13 PULLEYS9 END CAP ROLLERS $ 47eM RADIATOR HOSES M. 5343.89 MISC. REPAIR PARTS 5294.15 $299.15 GAS SERVICE }239.07 GAS SERVICE S824.07 GAS SERVICE S307X50 GAS SERVICE $139.03 GAS SERVICE S72.24 GAS SERVICE S139.24 $1.920.95 GFARSv BUSHING S11,32 $11.32 PUMP )ZEP IR M21.65 S121.55 ANGLE ;SASNE S -TX jIGS S30.00 SUPPL lES -l.28 111 .20 - POST GE POR _ TER READING CAP35 S341.11 POSTAGE PPR"IT- A _ _ RILLS S3Q2 46- S733.5701 WINCH-HOIST 111F.00 Silb.00 j MISC. TOOLS BB -00 18 semo_. U -BOLTS W/NUTS %27.2C S27,20 13L MB- =G PARTS SI O.. 9 slo.19 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/84 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS9 INC COUPLING ADAPTER WATER AND SEWER DIVISION INVOICE AMOUNT $50.70 ***TOTAL** WATER & SEWER FUND - O&M $1069004.32 WATER E SEWER FUND - DIE PAGE 12 TOTAL $50.70 41061793.79 $789.47 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND IMRF PAYMENT FOR FEB.184 $34.24 FICA PAYMENT FOR PAY OF 2/16/84 $15.38 $49.62 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. GAS SERVICE $351.89 $351.89 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $401.51 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $401.51 #-...a...w..�w....ww.aa.:.#yr�y�..........1.....,.....w..,•..••.,.. �. r. .,ww-Y ...w wwww...wwwwr..... -a .,... w.a +,... ..�.a .aw w�.wr...iw ......w �... w..i�##'+'<##�; w .. -� ww.s w. ...�..w .•-:,-,•, •r.•,-,•.--.-,-,• ,-,-,-�•v-.-r.-v-:-.•v-.•-: i -v•.•-. v-:.-v-...,•.,..,•,•-,.,-,•.•-k-.•.; -...: -r...•.. v -.-.•-.-v.-.•-, v'-kvvv, vv-,#v#',k,f#',�#•.',�#',�vv-.-.,•,t,-v -r# ENGINEERING DIVISION B & H INDUSTRIES BLUELINE PAPERS DRAFTING TAPES RULER $33.69 $33.69 COMMONWEALTH EDISON TRANSFORMER FACILITIES RENTAL $37.20 STREET, HWY. & TRAFFIC LIGHTING -JAN. $39901.29 $39938.49 DREW JOHANSON WORKSHOP EXPENSES $40.00 $40.00 PETTY CASH - MANAGEMENT SERVICES TRAVEL, SUPPLIES $1.34 $1.34-' PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL, SUPPLIES $32.00 $32.00 SOIL EROSION & SEDIMENTATION SEMINA SOIL EROSION & SED. SEMINAR -2 $80.00 $80.00=: ENGINEERING DIVISION ***TOTAL** 84.125.52 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 2/29/84 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUNS $224.23 MOTOR. FUEL TAX FUND $3001.29 iST AND DEB'==: S LL`NOIS MUNILJPAL RETIREMENT FUND TRUST AND ')EB' S IMRF PAYMENT FOR FE9.184 $39677.62 FICA PAYMENT FOR. PAY OF 2/16/84 $5,705.36 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $149382.48 ***TOTAL** £14,382.98* $14,382.98 r:LL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $3439951.20 Carolyn H. Krause Mayor C 1'�,kccu o, it- kA— Village of Mount Prospect OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 March 1, 1984 Rhone 312 / 392-6000 The Honorable Richard M. Daley State's Attorney Office of the State's Attorney 2600 South California Chicago, Illinois 60608 Re: Prosecution of DUI Violations Dear Mr. Daley: In recent years, the Village of Mount Prospect has under- taken to prosecute most of its own DUI violations. We hire our local prosecutor to handle these duties. He works closely with your office and I believe the arrangement has been satisfactory to both the Village and the County. The Mount Prospect Trustees and administrative staff are most comfortable with this situation. We are able to require periodic reports from our prosecutor and he is accountable directly to us for his activities. The results achieved through this system compare favorably with County -wide results achieved in DUI prosecutions. Our local prosecutor's office is experienced in all aspects of DUI prosecution from advising the Police Department to jury trials. As you are aware, the recent Second Appellate District case of Mundelein vs. Hartnett has que'stioned the validity of any local DUI Ordinance which isinconsistentin any respect with State law. However, Mount Prospect wishes to continue prosecuting its DUI arrests. We believe that the most efficient way to accomplish this would be for your office to extend Permission to the Village of Mount Prospect to prosecute offenders of the State DUI laws. I am, therefore, requesting, on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect, that your office authorize our Village prosecutor to prosecute Offenses written under Chapter 95z, Sections 11-501 and 11-501.1. This is a matter of great importance to our. Village and we appreciate your consideration. Very truly CAROLYN H. CFI,',/rcw yours, KRAUSE Village of Mount r-sped Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: FEBRUARY 29, 1984 SUBJECT: DUI ORDINANCE Today, Judge Nicholas Zagone of the Third District Court, ruled that g our DUI Ordinance was invalid. The first effect of that was to dismiss two sound DUI charges against Axel Brons and Jerome Cappon. They were represented by attorneys Lee and Moran. I am attaching a copy of the written opinion of Judge Zagone. A secondary effect of the Judge's ruling is that the Village of Mount Prospect no longer has a local DUI Ordinance and our Police Department has been instructed to write all future DUI citations according to the State Statute and have them Prosecuted by the Cook County State's Attorney. The third effect of Judge Zagone's ruling will now call upon us to review our Policy about the local DUI Ordinance and, in my opinion, the Court's Policy on DUI enforcement. Basically, the Judge has said that our Ordinance is deficient because it does not have a Class A Misdemeanor Penalty of a jail sentence. He further states that Home Rule Authority does not, in his opinion, extend to our providing a penalty differentfrom the State Statute. Our Prosecutor, Buzz Hill, is sending to my office a listing of options and commentary regarding our future course of actions. This will include an appeal to the Second Appellate Court. Mr. Hill feels that we do have some sound arguments and that the Judge's opinion is deficient. A second option would be to amend our Ordinance to provide for a jail sentence. However, in those cases requiring a jail sentence, the Village would have to provide a court reporter estimated at $7,500-$10,000 per year. Additionally, the Village might be called upon to provide a public defender for indigent personnel. Furthermore, I -am not sure which jail the defendant would be assigned to. We do not have long-term facilities. The third option would be to abandon the local DUI Ordinance entirely and write all DUI citations under the State Statute and have them prosecuted by the State's Attorney. When one looks at DUI enforcement across the State, it is my understanding that the history of enforcement and punishment is substantially more lenient in Cook County than the rest of the State. That was one of the reasons we enacted our local DUI Ordinance. A fourth option is to request the State's Attorney, Richard Daley, to delegate prosecutor duties for DUI offenses to the Village of Mount Prospect's Prosecutor. They have declined to do so in the past, however, we are drafting another letter to Daley making this request once again. A final alternative is to seek legislative correction in Springfield when the session resumes. That legislative correction would give Home Rule co,7-ani-inities the distinct authority to establish penalties without a jail sentence. It is quite clear that in Cook County the actions of the State's Attorney's office and the Judges lag behind public sentiment in the matter of DUI offenses. The judiciary is quite independent. In this case, the Third District will eventually make a shambles of all local DUI cases. Although I have no factual evidence to support this, it is my understanding that Judge Zagone was previously a defense attorney who handled a large volume of DUI cases. We have found resistance to our local DUI Ordinance since its inception and Judge Zagone has now effectively contravened the public policy of the Mayor and Board of Trustees. I have invited Buzz Hill to attend the Village Board meeting on Tuesday, March 6 so that we may discuss our courses of action. This can legitimately be discussed in Executive Session if that is the desire of the Mayor and Board of Trustees. We have seen further evidence in various agencies limiting the effective enforcement of DUI offenses. The Secretary of State's office has yet to establish a unified reporting system that can give our law enforcement officers, local prosecutors or State's attorneys information on prior convictions for DUI offenses. I will be asking the Executive Committee of the Northwest Central Dispatch as to whether or not we can start our own reporting system and, hopefully, exchange information with other dispatching networks. There may also be a possibility of using the PIMS system to capture and manipulate this data. 1, of course, will temper my approach to this subject dependent upon the policy direction of the Mayor and Board of Trustees. -2- But I do offer the opinion that other arms of our State and local governments are not looking for ways to enforce and control drunk driving, but rather, ways to defeat our attempts to do so. To prove this point, one should merely ask our judiciary how many jail sentences they have given out in Cook County? Our Ordinance is, however, deficient because it does not provide a jail sentence. TLB/rcw attachment TERRANCE L. BURG a D -3- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ZONING THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ELMHURST ROAD PLAZA IN THE VILLAGE OFMOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS ........ . . WHEREAS, Ensrec Corporation of 1620 Central Street, Evanston, Illinois has filed a petition with this Village requesting that certain property located at 2000 South Elmhurst Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois and hereinafter legally described, and commonly known as "Elmhurst Road Plaza" be rezoned from the B-3 Business, Retail and Service District to the B-4 Business, Retail and Service District, in order to allow the establishment, maintenance and operation of a self -serve car wash 'operation on a portion of said Property; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed zoning of said real estate was duly held before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on January 26, 1984, pursuant to proper legal notice thereof duly published in the Moujit, prO ct Herald on January 6, 1984; and . . . ....... . ...... ._ ___. WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that the aforesaid request, known as ZBA 4-Z-84, be granted; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of mount Prospect have determined it would be in the best interest of the Village to grant the requested zoning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein as fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The following described real estate shal.l. be hereby rezoned and classified from the B-3 Business, Retail and Service District to the B-4 Business, Retail and Service District as established by Chapter 14 of the Village Code of mount Prospect, Illinois, to wit: Lot 1 in Elmhurst Plaza, a Subdivision of the East 20 acres of the North East one-quarter of the South East one- quarter of Section 23, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian (except the North 760.96 feet. thereof as measured along the West and East line of said East 20 acres; also except the East 50 feet thereof used for Elmhurst Road) as recorded on December 12, 1977 as Document No. 24238614 in Cook County, Illinois. SECTION THREE: The official zoning map of the Village of "_,__ M , ount Prospect shall be amended to reflect the rezoning action accomplished by this Ordinance, subject to the following conditions: A. Saj.d Cvelorlment s h ti 11 be s0](DlY tc) :tart c)Mr)t.-u.ve uses,, sc'l - c a r ,-v a s h B. Said development shall consist of five 1 --story buildings to be located as designated on the attached Site Plan. I ZBA 4-Z-84 Pg 2 of 2 C. A solid fence enclosure shall be used to enclose any open storage of vehicles, automotive components, and trash receptacles. D. Landscaping shall be provided within the development and along the perimeter thereof pursuant to the approval of the Community Development Department of the Village. E. All public improvements shall be constructed and installed in accordance with the requirements of the Development Code of the Village. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and a:?, -er its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet as provided by law. AYES: NAYS. - ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1984. ATTEST: --fill-age- President Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF' CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE ELMHURST ROAD PLAZA WITH A SPECIAL USE OF SUCH DEVELOPMENT FOR AUTOMOTIVE RELATED USES ONLY AND WITH CERTAIN VARIATIONS FROM THE REGULATIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Ensrec Corporation of 1620 Central Street, Evanston, Illinois the petitioner herein, has inade application for planned development for SPeCial and limited use thereof for automotive related uses, as hereinafter set forth, together with certain variations from the regulation of Chapter 14 'of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Ill-in0is, with respect to certain property located at 2000 South Elmhurst Road in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, and comumonly known as `"Elmhurst Road Plaza"; and WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows: Lot I in Elmhurst Road Plaza, a Subdivision of the East 20 acres of the North East quarter of the South East quarter Of Section 23, Township 4-1 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian (except. the North 760.96 feet thereof as measured along the West and East line of said East 20 acres; also excceOt the East 50 feet thereof used for Elmhurst Road) as recorded on December 12, 1977 as Document No. 24238614 in Cook County, Illinois. and WHEREAS, the petitioner seeks to develop said property, zoned and classified in the B-4 Business, Retail and Service District to construct five 1 -story buildings thereon, all of Which would provide some type Of automotive maintenance facility, including a self -serve car wash facility; said buildings, internal driveway configuration, parking and truck loading areas are set forth and contained in a certain Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part of this Or dinanc.e by reference; and WHEREAS, petitioner further seeks to construct said development pursuant to the following variations from the regulations of Article XXI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, to wit: A. A variation from Section 14.2102.0. To reduce the minimum rear yard area from 20 feet to zero for parking. B. A variation from Section 1-4.2101,.A.1. To reduce the requirement for off-street parking spaces from one space per each 100 square feet of gross building floor area to one space per each 300 square feet of gross building floor area as -it relates to the self -serve car wash facility. C A va ia i,..1.oT-.1 S(,c �Ljon 14.2105.B. To elirrinate the requirc!-�Ient fi:)r F, t -i --,ick 10�-Iding space for that bt,ii]d_inq maintaining the car wash facility; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said petition (designated as Case Nos. ZBA 5 -SU -84 and 6-V-84) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on January 26, 1.984, pursuant to proper publication of due notice thereof in the Mount Prospect Herald, on January 6, 1984; and ZBA 5 84, 6-V--84 Pg_ 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its finding and recommendation to the village in favor of said planned unit develop- ment for limited automotive uses with the requested variations from Regulations in the B-4 Business, Retail and Service District; and WHEREAn the President and Board of Trustees have considered the petition and have determined that the subject property complies with the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI, Section 14.704 of Article VII, and Section 14.2503 of Article XXV of said Chapter 14 regarding a special use, variations, and planned development and that the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect will be obtained by the adoption of the necessary ordinance to approve and authorize the same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth here and above are incorporated findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The planned unit development for the subject property as set roicontained �Eh and ontaneattached d in the ttachd Site Plan is hereby approved, and the rear yard, parking and truck loading requirements of Article XXI of Chapter. 14 shall be varied, as requested, and as reflected on the subject Site Plan, and said planned unit development is hereby authorized subject to the following conditions: A. Said development shall be limited solely to automotive maintenance uses, including a self -serve car wash facility. B. Said development shall consist of five 1 -story buildings to be located as designated on the attached Site Plan. C. A solid fence enclosure shall be used to enclose any open storage of vehicles, automotive components, and trash receptacles. D. Landscaping shall be provided within the development and along the perimeter thereof pursuant to the approval of the Community Development Department of the Village. E. All. public improvements shall be constructed and installed in accordance with the requirements of the Development Code of the Village. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from QA_hT&j_1Q passage, approval and publication in pamphlet as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1984. ATTEST: --sildenE Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING CERTAIN VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1590 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Leo G. Straton, the contract purchaser has filed an application for certain variations with respect to property located at 1590 South Busse Road in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois (the "Subject Property") and legally described on the attached Rider; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located in the B-4 Business, Retail and Service District as set forth in Article X(I of said Chapter 14, and Petitioner seeks variations from the following sections thereof, to wit: a. A variation from Section 14.2102.A. to reduce the required front yard from twenty feet to ten feet. b. A variation from Section 14.2102.C. to reduce the required rear yard from twenty feet to zero feet. C. A variation from Section 14.2105 requiring an off- street truck loading area. d. A variation from Section 14.2105 to reduce the required parking spaces from 31 to 28; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the variation requests (designated as Case No. ZBA-3-V-84) before the zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 9th day of February, 1984 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount2E�s,,�ct herald on the 25th day of January, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its finding and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect to grant the variations regarding a reduction in required front yard and rear yard area, and to deny the variations regarding a reduction of an off-street truck loading area and required parking spaces; and the President and Board of Trustees of said Village have given further consideration to the variation requests and have determined that those recommended to be granted satisfy the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, and further find that it would be in the best interest of the Village to grant the requested variations recommended to be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incor- porated 1�ei"n` as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the property hereto- fore described the variations requested with respect to Section 14.2102.A. and Section 14.21.02.C. of Article XXI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, to allow the reduction in front yard area from 20 to 10 feet, and the reduction of rear yard area from 20 to 0 feet for parking spaces only, as set forth on the amended Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "B". Said variation shall be subject to the petitioner first submitting ZBA 3-V-84 Pg 2 of 2 to the Conununity Development Department, for its approval., a landscape plan detailing the proposed plantings and ultiiTiate installation of the improvements upon the Subject Property, including plantings along the North property line adjacent to the parking spaces. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR, This Ordinance shall be in full_ force a.nd effect lFr --- 6m—a"n d" a-fter its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAY S -. ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of . ........ __—, 1984. Village President Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: TERKANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: RONALD W. PAVLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICE SUBJECT: SOLICITORS ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATION DATE: MARCH 1, 1984 As you requested, attached are the procedures and forms for the registration and regulation of solicitors within the Village of Mount Prospect. There are two areas which should be further refined in the ordinance. The first is a recommendation that the 72 hour time limit before approving a solicitor registration not include weekends and holidays, and be limited to the normal work week. The second is that the ordinance requires a conviction before the Chief of Police has the authority to make an immediate revocation of a solicitor's registration. It would be a benefit if the ordinance included some specific authority for the Chief of Police to revoke a registration after several verified incidents of solicitor violations have occurred. This would provide immediate response to multiple complaints received within the same time If appropriate, it may he advisable to provide a handout, which would he a simplified synopsis of the ordinance, for each solicitor at the time registration is approved. tL � /d , vc 'Ronald W. Pavlock Chief of Police KWP:Jh �ICITOR REGULATIONS WHAT YOU CAN DO TO AVOID SOLICITORS AT YOUR DOOR I- If you do not wish to have any solicitors entering upon your premises, use the attached decal which states No Solicitors Invited and affix it to the main entrance to your residence or to another area which can be easily seen. 2. If you wish to have only solicitors registered with the Mount Prospect Police Department entering on your premises, use the attached decal which states Only Solicitors Registered With The Mount Prospect Police Department Invited, and affix it to the main entrance to your residence or to an area which can be easily seen. YOUR OPTIONS IF A SOLICITOR ENTERS YOUR PREMISES 1. If you have a decal posted which indicates no solicitors invited, advise the solicitor that you do not wish any solicitation and the individual is to leave your premises. 2. If you have a decal which permits Registered Mount Prospect Solicitors, you should verify that the solicitor has been registered with the Police Department. All solicitors registered with the police department have a card which indicates that they are registered. This card is required to be displayed. PROBLEMS WITH SOLICITORS 1. If a problem should arise with a solicitor whether or not the solicitor is registered with the Village of Mount Prospect Police Department, you can request that the individual leave your premises. Under the solicitors ordinance, the solicitor is required to leave your premises. 2. If the solicitor refuses to leave your premises peacefully, becomes dis- orderly, or continues to attempt to solicit after being requested to leave you are to call the police department emergency number 253-2151. POLICE DEPARTMENT CONTACT 1. Upon the arrival of the police officer you will have the fAlowing options: a. If the solicitor is still an your premises, -- advise t - he officer as to what has taken place and request that the officer remove the person from the premises. b. If the solicitor has either entered upon your premises in violation of the posted decals, or has refused to leave, you have the option of signing a complaint for trespassing. This will require that you come to the police station to sign the complaint and to appear in court at a later date and time. 2. The police officer will not effect an arrest unless you are willing to sign a complaint, since the officer cannot testify in court to the actions that took place prior to the arrival at your residence. SWA.CITOR REG"IS.RRA,7`i0N PROC1iJ7)Rj-_,.> VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE A. All solicitors requesting registration will be referred to the Village Clerk's office. B. The Village Clerk will have the Solicitors Registration Form cOmpleted by the solicitor. Each solicitor, R�ust complete the form, a. company representative cannot register for all solicitors. C. Upon completion of the form, it will be notarized by the Village Clerk. D- The form will then be forwarded to the Deputy Police Chief of Administrative Services. POLICE DEPARTMENT A. The Police Department will check with the State. of Illinois to ascertain if any criminal history exists on any individual requesting -to be a registered solicitor. B. The registration form will be returned to the Village Clerk, either approved or disapproved. If disapproved, the reasons for such disapproval will he stated. VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE A. Upon receipt of the registration form, if approved, the Village Clerk will issue the appropra.ate cards indicating that the solicitor has registered with the Village of Movant Prospect. B. All data entry into the computer system will be made by the Village Clerk's Office. C. The Village Clerk will verify that the company or individual requesting to be registered as a solicitor has not previously been denied such permission or had such permission revoked in the past. SOLICITOR PROBLEMS A. If a problem arises with a solicitor and the Police respond' a field case report will be filed. A copy of the case report will be forwarded to the Village Clerk for entry into the computer system. B. If there are verified complaints reference one solicitor or one Particular company, the Chief of Police will revoke the solicitor registration. C. If the solicitor registration is revoked, the Village Clerk will send such notification by registered mail. D. If a person is registered and actively soliciting in the Village, a notice and secure any identification officer may serve the revocation police Provided by the Village. DATE OF APPLICATION EMPLOYERS NAME/FIRM ADDRESS____ BUSINESS PHONE LLAGE OF' MOUNT PROSPECT SOLICITORS REGISTRATION --DATES REQUESTED FOR SOLICITATION - - - - - - - - - - - - - -CITY-- --,--.---STATE DATE OF YOUR EMPLOYMENT WITH THIS FIRM DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF SOLICITATION/GOODS OR SERVICES RENDERED YOUR FULL NAME (last YOUR PRESENT ADDRESS (first) —CITY— ZIP (m. i. ) STATE ADDRESSCITY STATE ADDRESS CITY ---STATE -- ADDRESS .--------- CITY ---- STATE _,�-- YOUR DATE OF BIRTH_�AGE.—SEX---RACE—HEIGHT—WEIGHT— — COLOR OF HAIR .----COLOR OF EYES COMPLEXION GLASSES— SCARS/ MARKS_ . MUSTACHE/BEARD MAKE OF VEHICLE USED WHILE SOLICITING ----dOLOR STATE VEHICLE REGISTRATION NUMBER -YEAR STATE HAS A PREVEIOUS CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION EVER BEEN ISSUED TO YOU BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT; IF SO, WHEN —, HAVE YOU EVER HAD A CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED TO YOU BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT REVOKED OR TAKEN AWAY: IF SO, WHEN HAVE YOU EVER BEFORE SOLICITED WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT. IF SO, WHEN WAS THIS: HAVE YOU OR ANY FIRM/EMPLOYER FOR WHICH YOU HAVE WORKED HAD A CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRA TION REVOKED BY ANY OTHER MUNICIPALITY IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS: IF SO, WHEN AND WHERE-.--,,--.--. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A VIOLATION OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF ANY VIOLATION OF A SOLICITORS OR CANVASSERS ORDINANCE IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT OR IN ;&Y OTHER ILLINOIS MUNICIPALITY: — IF SO, WHEN WHERE i_ 2 HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED 01' A FELONY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS OR ANY OTHER STATE OR FEDERAL LAW OF THE UNITED STATES? IF YES, WHEN? I PLEASE EXPLAIN: The Village of Mount Prospect Solicitors Ordinance prohibits the following: A. Section 11:2812 - Prohibits any solicitor to enter upon any premises which has been posted with a sign/decal indicating that "ONLY SOLICITORS REGISTERED WITH THE MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT INVITED", unless such solicitor has registered with the Mount Prospect Police Department. B. Section 23:302 - Prohibits any solicitor to enter upon any premises which has been posted with a sign/decal. indicating that "NO SOLICITORS INVITED".. It does not matter if the solicitor is registered with the Mount Prospect Police Department. No entry to the premises are to he made. If a solicitor enters upon a premises and is given either written or oral notification to leave the premises, the solicitor is required to stop all soliciting and leave the premises. C. Section 11:2815 - Prohibits any type of soliciting before 9:00 a.m. or after 9:00 p.m. on any weekday. There is no soliciting on Sundays or on a State or National Holiday. A violation of any of the above ordinances can result in the following: 1. Any permission given by the Village of Mount Prospect or the Mount Prospect Police Department to solicit within the Village of Mount Prospect will be revoked. 2. A resident or the Police Department can place a charge of Trespassing for entering on premises which have been posted as indicated above. This could result in an arrest and subsequent court action. The Mount Prospect Police Department has the right to investigate each request for a solicitor's application and respond to the application within (72) hours. Until such time as the Police Department has fully investigated the request for solicitation within the Village of Mount Prospect, and approved such request, a solicitor is not considered as being a registered solicitor. I hereby -wear that all of the above are true statements to the best of my knowledge and that I have read and understand the Ordinance governing solicitation within the Village of Mount Prospect. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF --�"i-q,n"a-t,"ii-re—O,-f-,-A—pp 1- - c-"a—n t NOTARY PUBLIC 3 DATE APPROVED/DISAPPROVED BY CHIEF OF POLICE REASONS FOR NON -APPROVAL RONALD W. PAVLOCK CHIEF OF POLICE DATE REGISTRATION ISSUED:-- DATES FOR REGISTRATION PERIOD REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE ISSUED, EXPIRATION DATE ISSUED BY_ DATE ENTERED INTO COMPUTER BY I Village of Mount Prospect 112 E. Northwest Highway Mount Prospect. Illinois 60056 DEPARTMENT OF POLICE Chief Ronald W, PavloCk Dear Resident: Phone 312 / 3S2-6000 There have been a number of court decisions which have specified that a municipality such as Mount Prospect cannot stop canvassers and solicitors from doing business within the community. However, the village of Mount Prospect can place reasonable restrictions on soliciting for those residents -who -a6 not wishtohave solicitors enter upon their premises. -Mount Prospect can also limit the hours during which soliciting can take place as well as the days on which soliciting will be permitted., The Mayor and the Village Board of Mount Prospect have recently approved and passed a municipal ordinance regulating solicitors. This ordinance is within the guidelines specified by court decisions, but for effective enforcement it requires the cooperation of each resident of the community. The ordinance specifies that the resident can determine as to whether or not they wish to have solicitors enter upon their premises for the purpose of soliciting. In order to assist you in making this determination, enclosed are two decals indicating that "No Solicitors Are Invited" and "Only Solicitors Registered with the Mount Prospect Police Invited". These decals are for your use.--. Also attached is a synopsis of the solicitors regulati'6ns as they apply to the citizen. Please read these regulations and then make a determination as to whether or not you wish to prohibit solicitors from entering upon your property. The Mayor and the Village Board of Mount Prospect as well as the Village Administrative Staff will make every effort to see that the solicitors ordinance is fully enforced. Sincerely, CRIME PREVENTION CONSULTANTS COMPUTER PROGRAM INPUT INFORMATION 1. Company Name 2. Company Address 3. Company phone number 4. Type of soliciting (may need code table) 5. Name of individual solicitor 6. Date of birth of individual Solicitor 7. Date of Registration 8. Date of expiration 9. Complaint field by number both for company and individual RETRIEVAL 1. Alphabetical listing by company name 2. Alphabetical listing by individual name OUTPUT REPORTS NAME OF NAME OF INDIVIDUAL LAST COMPANY INDIVIDUAL COMPANY REGISTRATION COMPLAINTS COMPLAINTS XYZ SMITH, ROBERT 2/4/84 84-78 CERAMICS INC. JONES, WILLIAM 2/11/84 84-79 OUTPUT REPORTS NAME OF NAME OF LAST COMPANY INDIVIDUAL INDIVIDUAL COMPANY REGISTRATION COMPLAINTS COMPLAINTS SMITH, ROBERT XYZ 2/4/84 84-78 JONES, WILLIAM CERAMICS INC. 2/11/84 84-79 RETRIEVAL FROM POLICE RECORDS 1. All information can be retrieved by complainant name. 2. Gross number of solicitor complaints retrieved by I-UCR code. S(, TORS CASE REPORT DA'L'E/TIME OF COMPLAINT ( DATE/TIME ARRIVED_ DATE/TIME OF COMPLETION-——_.. ...w.w_ COMPLAINANT NAME{last, first, middle) ADDRESS PHONE NO. t t NAME OF COMPANY EMPLOYING SOLICITOR _ & ADDRESS y PHONE NO. SOLICITORS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NO. F i A M Was a complaint signed: Yes NO Was the solicitor registered with YES NO the Village of Mount Prospect NARRATIVE ____.__ wl REPORTING OFFICER STAR # REPORTING OFFICER STAR # SUPERVISOR APPROVING STAR FIELD OPFJRATIONS PROCEDE'' OPS MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT INDEX AS: SOLICITOR COMPLAINTS 1.1 POLICY It is the policy of the Mount Prospect Police Department to respond to citizen complaints of solicitors and to take any appropriate action required. 1.2 PURPOSE The purpose of this order is to establish procedures for the investigation of citizen complaints of violation of the solicitors ordinance. 1.3 PROCEDURES FOR SOLICITORS COMPLAINTS A. Upon receiving a radio call of a solicitor complaint, the officer is to proceed to the scene and inter -view the complainant. B. Based on the circumstances indicated by the complainant, the officer is to take the following action: 1. Interview the complainant as to whether or not they wish to sign a complaint for Trespassing as specified under Article 111, 23:302 to 23:303.4 of the municipal code. 2. If the complainant wishes to proceed to prosectution, the solicitor is to he taken into custody and normal arrest/ booking procedures are to be followed. 3. If the complainant does not wish to sign a complaint, and only requests that the solicitor be removed from the premises, the officer will order the solicitor to leave the premises. Should the solicitor refuse to leave the premises, the solicitor is to be placed under' arrest and charged as under 8.1. above. The complainant is to be advised that they will be summoned to court as a witness. 4. In those instances where the solicitor has already left the scene, the officer is to ascertain if the the complainant wishes to sign a complaint. If the complainant decides to prosecute, the solicitor is to be taken into custody if apprehended. If not apprehended, the complainant is to be advised as to the procedures for obtaining a arrest warrant. However, this referral should only be made in those instances where the solicitor can be identified by the complainant and there are sufficient facts included in the Solicitors Field Case Report which lead to an effective investigation. 5. In all cases where the solicitor has left the scene and where the complainant does not wish to sign a complaint, the officer is to obtain sufficient information to complete the Solicitor Field Case Report as fully as possible. 19 1.4 REQUIRED REPORTS A. In all instances of a solicitor complaint a Solicitor Field Case Report is to be completed. The only exception would he when insufficient information was obtained to identify a complainant or to identify a solicitor for a field interview. 1-5 RECORDS PROCESSING A. The Solicitor Field Interview Report will be processed as follows: 1. A copy of the report is to be forwarded to the Village Clerk. 2. All information from the report is to -be entered into the computerized records system. 3. In entering the information from the case repo I rt, all persons involved in.the incident are to be entered on the person -add module. RONALD W. PAVLOCK CHIEF OF POLICE I VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SOLICITOR REGISTRATION NAME ---,.-- COMPANY DATE DATE OF -- EXPIRATION '-.- PERMIT m 10988 ORDIN CE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE XXVIII ENTITLED -VENDORS, SOLICITORS. TOBACCO DEALERS AND OTHERS ENGAGED IN RETAIL SALES AND SERVICES- OF CHAPTER I OF 1IlE VILLAGE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TRE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT. COOK COUNTY. ILLINOIS: SEg!_IONONE: Article XXVIII entitled 'Vendors. Solicitors, Tobacco Dealers and Others Engaged in Retail Sales and Services" of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect. Illinois (1981) as amended is hereby rescinded in its entirety and a new Article XXVIII shall be substituted therefor to read as follows: "ARTICLE XxViii VENDORS, SOLICITORS AND oTUERS. ENGAGED IN RETAIL SALES AND SERVICES SECTION: 11.2801 Vendors: License Required 11.2802 Application for License 11-2803 Bond 11-2804 Investigation and Issuance of License 11.2805 License Fees 11.2806 Transfer of License 11.2807 Exhibition of License 11.2808 Loud Noises and Speaking Devices 11.2809 Use of Streets 11-2810 Inspections 11.2811 Revocation or Denial of License 11.2812 Solicitors: Registration 11.2813 Application for Registration 11.2814 investigation and Issuance of Registration Certificate 11-2815 Limitations on Soliciting 11.2816 Revocation or Denial of Registration See- 11.2801. Vendors; License Required. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of hawker, peddler, itinerant merchant, transient vendor of merchandise as defined in Article I of this Chapter or of providing other retail sales or services within the corporate limits of the Village without first obtaining a license therefor as provided herein. See 11-2802- Application for License. In addition to meeting the requirements contained in Chapter 10 of this Village Code with respect to applying for and obtaining a license from the Village Clerk, an applicant for a license required Linder this Article shall verify his application and shall provide the following: A. A brief description of the nature of the business and the goods to be sold and in the case of products of farm or orchard, whether produced or grown by the applicant. B. It employed, the name and address of the employer, together with credentials establishing the exact relationship. C. The length of time for which the right to do business is desired. D- The place where the goods or property proposed to be sold, or orders taken for the sale thereof, are manufactured or produced, where such goods or products are located at the time said application is filed, and the proposed method of delivery. E. it a vehicle is to be used, a description of the same, together with license number or other means of identif kation. F- The place or places, other than the permanent place of business of the applicant where applicant within six (6) months next preceding the date of said application conducted a transient business, stating the nature thereof and giving the post office and street address of any building or office in which such business was conducted_ GF A statement of the nature, character and quality of the goods, wares or merchandise to be sold or offered for sale by applicant in the Village; the invoice value of such goods, wares and merchandise; whether the same are proposed to be sold from stock in possession or by sample, by direct sale, or by taking orders for future delivery; where the goods or property proposed to be sold are manufactured or produced: and where such goods or products are located at the time said application is filed; and H. Credentials from the person for which the applicant proposes to do business, authorizing the applicant to act as such representative. See- 11-2803- Bond - Before any license applied for pursuant to Section 11.2802 shall be issued for engaging in the business of hawker, peddler, itinerant merchant or transient vendor of merchandise, such applicant shall file with the Village Clerk a bond running to the Village in the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) executed by the applicant. as principal, and two (2) sureties upon which service of process may be made in the State of Illinois; said bond to be approved by the Village Attorney, conditioned that. the said applicant shall comply fully with all of the provisions of the ordinances of the VilIlage and the Statutes of the State of Illinois, regulating and concerning the sale of goods, wares and merchandise and will pay all fines or Judgments rendered against said applicant for any violation of said ordinances or Statutes, or any of them, together with all judgments and costs that may be recovered against him by any person or persons for damage growing out of any misrepresentation or deception practiced on any person transacting such business with such applicant. whether said misrepresentations or deceptions were made or practiced by the owners or by their servants, agents or employees, either at the time of making the sale or through any advertisement of,any character whatsoever, printed or circulated with reference to the goods. wares and merchandise sold or any part thereof. A- Action on the bond may be brought in the name of the Village to the use of the aggrieved person_ B. Such bond must be approved by the Village Attorney, both as to form, and as to the responsibility of the sureties thereon_ Sec. 11.2804, investigation and Issuance of License- A. Upon the receipt of such application for license as specified in Section 11.2802 herein. the Village Clerk shall refer the original to the Chief of Police, who shall cause such investigation of the applicant's business and moral character to be made as is necessary for the protection of the public good. B. It, as a result of such investigation, the applicant's character or business responsibility is found to be unsatisfactory. the Chief of Police shall endorse on such application his disapproval and his reasons for the same.' and return the said application to the Village Clerk, who shall notify the applicant that his application is disapproved and that no license will be issued. C. If, as a result of such investigation, the character and business responsibility of the applicant are found to be satisfactory. the Chief of Police shall endorse on the application his approval and return the same to the Village Clerk. D. 'Upon payment of the license fee prescribed below, the Village Clerk shall issue a license to the applicant_ Sec. 11-2805- License Fees. A. The fee which shall be charged by the Village Clerk for a license to engage in the business of hawker, peddler, itinerant merchant or transient vendor shall be seven dollars fifty cents ($7.50) per day; thirty seven dollars fifty cents ($37-50) per week: seventy five dollars ($75.00) per month; and one hundred fifty dollars ($150-00) per year. B. The annual fees for persons selling cigarettes, cigars and/or tobacco at retail, whether as a specialty or in conjunction with the providing of other retail sales or services, shall be thirty seven dollars fifty cents ($37.50), which fee shall be in addition to any other license fee provided in this Section. C. The annual fees for such other retail sales and service businesses regulated under this Article (other than solicitors and canvassers) shall be determined as set forth in Article XXXIV of this Chapter_ U. None of the license fees provided for by this Article shall be so applied as to occasion an undue burden upon interstate commerce. I- In any case where a license fee is believed by a licensee or applicant for license to place an undue burden upon such commerce, he may apply to the Village Treasurer for an adjustment of the fee so that it shall not be discriminatory, unreasonable or unfair as to such commerce. 2. Such application may be made before, at, or within six (6) months after payment of the prescribed license fee. 3. The applicant shall, by affidavit and supporting testimony, show his method of business and the gross volume or estimated gross volume of business and such other information as the Treasurer may deem necessary in order to determine the extent, if any, of such undue burden on such commerce- 4- The Treasurer shall then conduct an investigation. comparing applicant."s businea;s with other businesses of like nature and shall maker findings of fact from which he shall determine whether the fee fixed by this Article is unfair, unreasonable or discriminatory as to applicant's business and shall fix as the license fee for the applicant an amount that is fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory, or, it the fee has already been paid. shall order a refund of the amount over and above the fee so fixed_ 5. In fixing the fee to be charged, the Treasurer shall have the power to base the fee upon a percentage of gross sales. or any other method which will assure that the fee assessed shall be uniform with that assessed on businesses of like nature. so long as the amount assessed does not exceed the fees as prescribed by this Section. 6. Should the Treasurer determine the gross sales measure of the fee to be the fair basis® he may require the applicant to submit, either at the time of termination of applicant's business in the Village or at the end of each three (3) month period, a sworn statement of the gross sales and pay the amount of fee therefor, provided that no additional fee during any one calendar year shall be required after the licensee shall have paid an amount equal to the annual license as prescribed in this Section.. See- 11-2806- Transfer. No license shall be transferred without written consent from the Village Clerk as evidenced by an endorsement on the face of the license by the Village Clerk showing to whom the license is transferred and the date of the transfer. Sec- 11.2807. Exhibition of License. Vendors and peddlers are required to exhibit their licenses at the requrest of any citizen. No licensee under this Article nor anyone in his behalf shall shout, make an outcry, blow a horn. ring a bell or use any other sound device including any loud speaking radio or amplifying system uY on any of the streets, alleys, parks or other public places of this Village, or upon any private premises in the said Village where sound of sufficient volume is emitted or produced therefrom capable of being plainly heard upon the streets, avenues, alleys or parks or other public places, for the purpose of attracting attention to any goods, ware or merchandise which such licensee proposes to sell - No vendor or peddler shall have any exclusive right to any location in the public streets, nor shall he be permitted a stationary location. nor shall he be permitted to operate in any congested area where his operations night Uspede or inconvenience the public- For the purpose of this Article. the judgment of a police officer. exercised in good faith, shall be deemed conclusive as to whether the area is congested or the public impeded or inconvenienced- See. 11.2810- Inspections. It shall be the duty of the Director of Community Development and the Fire Prevention Bureau to inspect every premises housing a business providing retail sales and/or services licensed under this Article as well as any other premises used as a base of operations for any other business of hawker. peddler. itinerant merchant, and/or transient vendor licensed under this Article, which inspections shall take place as often as necessary to insure compliance with this Article and all other ordinances relating to businesses licensed hereunder - Sec. 11-2811- Revocation or Denial of License. All licenses issued under this Article may be revoked by the Village Manager, or an application for issuance or renewal of such license may be refused by the Village Clerk, in the manner provided for such proceedings in Chapter 10 of this Village Code. Sec. 11.2812. Solicito-rs; Registration - It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of soliciting or canvassing as defined in Article I of this Chapter upon any premises within the corporate limits of the Village wherein an owner or occupant has posted a sign upon or near the principal entrance inviting therein only solicitors who have registered with the Police Department without such solicitor first registering with the Police Department in the manner provided in this Article. Sec. 11-2813. Application for Registration. All applicants for registration to solicit or canvass upon premises within the Village. wherein an owner or occupant has posted a sign upon or near the principal entrance inviting therein only those solicitors who have registered with the Police Department, shall execute an application blank at the office of the Chief of Police. which applicant shall truthfully state the information requested on the application. under oath. to -wit: A. Name and address of present place of residence and length of residence at such address: also business address if other than residence address; 13- Address of place of residence during the past three (3) years if other than present address; C. Physical description of the applicant; D. Name and address of the person by whom the applicant is employed or represents and the length of time of such employment or representation; E. Description sufficient. for identification of the subject matter of the soliciting which the applicant will engage in; F. Period of time for which the certificate is applied for: G_ The date, or approximate date, of the latest previous registration application tinder this Article. if any; H. If a certificate of registration for the applicant or the organization he represents under this Article has ever been denied or revoked. a statement to that effect and the reasons therefor: -- 5 - 1. If the applicant has ever been convicted of a violation of any of the provisions of this Article or the provisions of any other municipality regulating soliciting, a statement to that effect with particulars; and J. If the applicant has ever been convicted of the commission of a felony under the laws of the State of Illinois or any other State of Federal laws of the United States, a statement to that effect with particulars_ Sec. 11.2814. Investigation and Issuance of Registration Certif irate_ A. Within _72__ 7 - 2 - hours of the receipt of an application for registration the Chief of Police shall complete his investigation and shall issue a Certificate of Registration to each applicant found to be qualified- The Registration Certificate shall state the expiration date thereof_ B. No Certificate Of Registration shall be issued to any person who has been convicted of the commission of a felony under the laws of the State of Illinois or any other State or Federal law of the United States, within five (5) years of the date of the application. nor to any person who has been convicted of a violation of any of the provisions of this Article» nor to any person or organization whose certificate of registration issued. or applied for hereunder has previously been revoked or denied as herein provided. C, No Certificate of Registration shall be issued to any person or organization whose application, upon oath, contains false material information or statements. D. The Chief of Police shall cause to be kept in his office an accurate record of every application received and acted upon, together with all other information and data pertaining thereto, of all certificates of registration issued under the provisions of this Article, and of the denial of applications- Applications for certificates shall be numbered in consecutive order as filed, and every certificate issued, shall be identified with the duplicate number of the application upon which it was issued_ Sec. 11.2815- Limitations on Soliciting. It is hereby declared to be unlawful and shall constitute a nuisance for any person whether registered under this Article or not, to go upon any premises and ring the door bell upon or near any door of a residence located thereon, or rap or knock upon any door, or create any sound in any other manner calculated to attract the attention of the occupant of such residence, for the purpose of securing an audience with the occupant thereof and engage in soliciting as herein defined, prior to nine o'clock (9:00) A -M. or after nine o'clock (9:00) P -M_ of any weekday, or at any time on a Sunday, or on a State or National Holiday, or in violation of a notice sign located upon or near the entrance of any premises or an oral notice of the occupant that solicitors are not invited, as provided in Article III of Chapter 23 of this Village Code. See. 11.2816- Revocation or Denial of ]Registration_ A. Any certificate of registration issued hereunder shall be revoked by the Chief of Police if the holder of the certificate is convicted of a violation of any of the Provisions of this Article, or has made a false material statement in the application, or otherwise becomes disqualified for the issuance of a certificate of registration under the terms of this Article- Immediately - 6 — upon such revocation, written notice thereof, shall be given by the Chief of Police to the holder of the certificate in person or by certified U -S. rZail addressed to his or her residence address set forth in the application. B. Immediately upon the giving of such notice. the certificate of registration shall become null and void_ C. Any person or organization whose Certificate of Registration has been revoked as provided herein. shall be denied any subsequent Certificate of Registration." SECTION TThis Ordinance shall ._.....:_C+: . -be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in accordance with law. PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of 1984_ ARES: NAY S -. ABSENT: ATTEST: Village President - 7 - 1102R ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE III ENTITLED "TRESPASS" OF CHAPTER 23 of THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: Article III entitled "Trespass" of Chapter 23 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois (1981) is hereby amended by rescinding said Article III in its entirety and by substituting therefor a new Article III to read as follows: "ARTICLE III TRESPASS SECTION: 23.301 Trespass Prohibited. 23.302 Specifically Enumerated Trespasses. 23.303 Soliciting. 23.303.1 Village Policy on Soliciting. 23.303.2 Notice Regulating Soliciting. 23.303.3 Duty of Solicitors 23.303.4 Uninvited Soliciting Prohibited 23.304 Penalty Sec. 23.301. Trespasses Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to commit a trespass within this Municipality upon either public or private property. Sec. 23.302. Specifically Enumerated Trespasses. Without constituting any limitation upon the provisions of Section 23.301 above, any of the following acts by any person shall be deemed included among those that constitute trespasses in viola- tion of the provisions of said Section 23.301, and appropriate action may be taken hereunder at any time, or from time to time, to prevent or suppress any violation or violations of the Article, the afore- said enumerated acts so included, being as follows: A. An entry upon the premises, or any part thereof, of another, including any public property in violation of a notice posted or exhibited at themainentrance of said premises or at any point of approach or entry or in viola- tion of any notice, warning, or protest given orally or in writing, by any owner or occupant thereof; or B. The pursuit of a course of conduct or action incidental to the making of an entry upon the land of another in viola- tion of a notice pasted or exhibited at the main entrance to said premises or at any point of approach, or entry, or in violation of any notice, warning, or protest given orally or in writing by any owner or occupant thereof; or C. A failure or refusal to depart from the premises of another in case of being requested, either orally or in writing, to leave by any owner or occupant thereof; or D. the operation of a mini -bike, go-cart or snowmobile in the following places: < _ � l~ On private property of another, wl�etber or not open to the public, without the express consent of the owner or lessee, or other person in control. 2. On public school grounds, park property, playgrounds, sidewalks, recreational areas, streets, DuhIic rights- of-way, and/or other public property Without the express provision or consent by the proper public authority; and 3. on or across railroad right-of-way. E. An entry into or upon any vehicle, aircraft or watercraft made without the consent of the person having the right to the Possession or control thereof, or a failure or refusal to leave any such vehicle, oicocaft or watercraft after being requested to leave by the person having such right. F. Any entry upon the premises, or any pact thereof, of another, including any public p--opecty, during which entry any such property is defaced, broken, iojured or destroyed without the consentof the owner thereof. Seo. 23.303. SoIioitiog, Seo, 23.303.1. Village Policy on Soliciting. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the governing body of the Village that the occupant or occupants of the buildings in this Village shall make the determination of vbctbec solicitors or canvassers as defined in Article z of Chapter ll of this Code shall be, or shall not he, invited to their respective buildings. Sec. 23.303.2. Notice Regulating Soliciting. Every owner or occupant desiring to restrict or "prohibit solicitors or canvassers and to secure the protection intended to be provided by the regula- tions pertaining to soliciting contained in this Article, obaII give notice of such determination by the owner or an occupant of giving a restricted invitation to solicitors, or of the refusal of invitation to solicitors, to any buildings, in the following means: A. A weatherproof card, no larger than three inches by four inches (]" x 4") in aice, shall be exhibited upon or near the main entrance door to the building, indicating the determination by the owner or no occupant, containing the applicable words, as follows: "ONLY SOLICITORS -REGISTERED WITH THE MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT IN%1ITED" RM "NO SOLICITORS IN,v'ITED" B. The letters shall be at least one-third inch (I/3") in height. For the purpose of uniformity the cards abaII be provided by the Finance Director to persons requesting the same, at the cost thereof. C. Such card so exhibited shall constitute sufficient notice to any solicitor of the determination by the owner or occupant of the building of the information contained thereon. Sec. 23.383.3. Duty of Solicitors. A. It shall be the duty of every solicitor upon going onto any premises in the Village upon which a building as herein defined is located to first examine the notice provided for in Section 23.383.3 of this Article, if any is attached, and be governed by the statement contained on the notice. - 2 - 1. If the notice states "ONLY SOLICITORS REGISTERED WITH THE MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT INVITED", then the solicitor must obtain a certificate Of registra- tion as provided in Article xxvIIIof Chapter 11 of this Code, and a solicitor )-lot Possessing a valid certificate of registration as therein provided shall immediately and peacefully depart from the premises. 2. If the notice states "NO SOLICITORS INVITED", then the solicitor, whether registered or not, shall immediately and peacefully leave the premises. B. Any solicitor who has gained entrance to any building, whether invited or not, shall immediately and peacefully depart from the premises when requested to do so by the occupant. Sec. 23.303.4. Unvited Soliciting Prohibited. It is hereby declared to be unlawful and shall constitute a nuisance for any person to go upon any premises and ring the door bell upon or near any door, or create any sound in any manner calculated to attract the attention of the Occupant of such building, for the Purpose of securing an audience with the Occupant thereof and engage in solicit- ing as herein defined, in defiance of the notice exhibited at the building or oral. notice given in accordance with the provisions of this Article. Sec. 23.304. Penalty. Every person convicted of a violation of any provision of this Article, shall be punished by a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars ($25-00) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500.00).11 SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from andafterits passage, approval and Publication in pamphlet form in accordance with law. PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ATTEST: Village President- - 3 - 1 1984. 1104R ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE IV ENTITLED "OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY" OF CHAPTER 23 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECTS ILLINOIS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: Article IV entitled 'Offenses Against Property" of Chapter -23 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois (1981) is hereby amended as follows: A. By adding a new Section 23.404 entitled "Vandalism" to read as follows: "Sec. 23.404. Vandalism. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to commit any of the following acts within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect: 1. Willfully, maliciously, recklessly or knowingly damage, deface, or destroy any property of another person without his consent; or 2. Willfully, maliciously, recklessly or knowingly start a fire on the land of another person without his consent; or 3. Willfully, maliciously, recklessly or knowingly deposit on the land or in a building of another, without his consent, any stink bomb, or other offensive smelling compound and thereby interfere with the use and occupancy by another of the land or building; or 4. Willfully, maliciously, recklessly or knowingly and without authority enter into any building, house trailer, motor vehicle, aircraft of water- craft, or any part thereof of another person without his consent. B. Any person convicted of a violation of any provision of this Section shall be fined not less than twenty- five dollars ($25.00) or in excess of five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each offense." B. By adding a new Section 23.405 entitled "Minor Offenders; Financial Responsibility of Parent or Legal Guardian" to read as follows: "Sec. 23.405. Minor Offenders; Financial Responsibility of Parent or Legal Guardian. A. The parent or legal guardian of an unemancipated juvenile who resides with such parent or legal guardian is liable for actual damages for the willful or malicious acts of such juvenile which cause injury or loss to the property of the public or any person. IF B Said juvenile shall be deemed to have committed the offense or offenses enumerated in this Article with the knowledge, consent, acquiescence and permission of the parent or legal guardian, in violation of this Section. C. The said parent or legal guardian shall be liable for restitution or reparation in an amount equal to the actual loss or damage to the property and/or pecuniary loss imposed by a Court upon the minor defendant for violation of this Article. When the Court orders restitution or reparation, the Court shal.l. determine the amount of and conditions for payment. If the parties have not agreed on the amount of damages, the Judge shall conduct a separate hearing on that issue. The measure of liability shall be the cost of repairing partially damaged property or the depreciated replace- ment cost of property damaged beyond repair. The amount of the actual loss or damage shall be presumed to be that amount represented by not less than two (2) bonafide itemized estimates of the damages incurred or an actual bill for repair or replacement presented by the victim. The defenant shall then have an opportun- ity to rebut the cost set forth in the aforesaid documents. If thereafter the conditions of payment have not been satisfied, the Court may, upon the motion of the Village and within the limits hereinabove set forth, impose such additional penalties as it deems appropriate. In cases of actual or pecuniary loss or damage to public property, the Court, on petition of the Village Prosecutor, may in its judgment and absolute discre- tion in addition or in lieu of any restitution, repara- tion or fine as hereinabove provided, direct and require that any juvenile found guilty hereunder, perform appropriate and reasonable services to or for any departments of the Village including but not limited to maintenance of parks, office or janitorial work. In cases where this Section is imposed as a penalty and subsequently satisfied, the provisions of this Section regarding parential responsibility shall not apply. D. No parent or legal guardian of an unemancipated juvenile who resides with such parent or legal guardian shall be held liable for damages as provided for in this Section, unless he or she is made a party defendant. A parent or legal guardian shall be made a party defendant by having received a written notice setting forth the charges against such unemancipated juvenile either by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by personal service, with a certificate of personal service returned to the Police Department of the Village prior to the filing of any lawsuit to recover such damages. E. Nothing in this Section shall prevent the Court from ordering, as part of reparations, that the juvenile, in appropriate cases, be required to perform the cleanup or repair of the damaged property." - 2 - SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect r uPn ti7iEsi-ii4e, approval, 'and publication in pamphlet form in accOordance with law. PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1.984. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: V-111 Tag---tf —1er-k--—'—'- Village President - 3 - WYMM ), a " N,rr,'� 00""n'T ...... . . .. ""'o "3M vw )y 'WrN, I V --S, �M, ""Wo/n. r )UMMMOMM"Vay Vg, M), as, , "s Wpa v/,r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF' THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, believe that it would be in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of I r;, unt Prospect to eliminate the occurrence of physical altercations at establishments holding a Village of Mount Prospect liquor license ("licensed premises"), and WHEREAS, such altercations place a tremendous burden upon the resources of the police department; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect further believe that the amount of alcohol that has been consumed by an individual bears a direct relationship to the tendency to engage in such altercation. BE IT THEREFORE ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect acting in exercise of th,iT--home rule powers: S - ECTION ONE: A section 13.119.1 shall be added to Chapter 13 of the Village Code, which shall be and read as follows: "Sec. 13.119.1. Fighting, Prohibited; Licensees Conduct. A. Fighting either inside or outside on any premises holding a liquor license in the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby prohibited. For the purpose of this Section, fighting shall mean any threatening or touching of another person which provokes or tends to provoke a breach of the peace. Any person engaging in fighting under the terms of this Section shall be presumed to have provoked the incident, and such a presumption may only be overcome by the presentation of clear and convincing evidence that the person was acting in self defense. Any person violating this Section shall be fined not less than One Hundredd Dollars ($100). 'N 2" MY , MYS Nff , /2,0 vwm am a md, ffs 'RW YMAP g mOrM B. A copy of Section 13.119.1-A shall be prominently displayed in letters not less than one inch (1") high in all premises holding a Class A, B, D, E, G, L, M, R, S or W liquor license. The notice shall further state than any person in -a licensed premises observing a fight shall immediately notify the Village of Mount Prospect Police Department. C. The following procedure shall be observed by a licensee or his agent or employee when a fight occurs on a licensed premises: 1. The licensee or his agent or employee on the premises shall immediately notify the Village of Mount Prospect Police Department. 2. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the occurrence, the licensee shall file with the Village of Mount Prospect Liquor Control Commissioner a report which contains the following information: a. The number of the persons involved in D. Failure (by the licensee, his agent or employee) to give immediate notification to the Mount Prospect Police Department of a fight on a licensed premises or failure to file a report as required in Subsection C with the Liquor Control Commissioner shall subject the licensee to a fine and a mandatory suspension of his Village of Mount Prospect Liquor License for a period of three (3) days. For purposes of this Section the word "immediate" shall refer to such time as one party threatens another or commences fighting with another. E. The occurence of a fight on a licensed premises shall give rise to the presumption that the licensee or his agent delivered alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person in violation of Section 13.122 of this Chapter. Based upon this presumption, the Local Liquor Control Commissioner may conduct a hearing pursuant to Section 13.123 of this Chapter. This presumption may be overcome only upon the presentation by the licensee of clear and convincing evidence to the - 2 - the fight; b. The approximate amount of alcohol consumed by each person involved in the fight, C. The action taken by the licensee to prevent the fight; d. The actions taken by the licensee subsequent to the start of the fight. e. The licensee's opinion as to why the fight occurred. D. Failure (by the licensee, his agent or employee) to give immediate notification to the Mount Prospect Police Department of a fight on a licensed premises or failure to file a report as required in Subsection C with the Liquor Control Commissioner shall subject the licensee to a fine and a mandatory suspension of his Village of Mount Prospect Liquor License for a period of three (3) days. For purposes of this Section the word "immediate" shall refer to such time as one party threatens another or commences fighting with another. E. The occurence of a fight on a licensed premises shall give rise to the presumption that the licensee or his agent delivered alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person in violation of Section 13.122 of this Chapter. Based upon this presumption, the Local Liquor Control Commissioner may conduct a hearing pursuant to Section 13.123 of this Chapter. This presumption may be overcome only upon the presentation by the licensee of clear and convincing evidence to the - 2 - contrary. This Paragraph E shall apply only to Local Liquor Control hearings and not to proceedings before a Circuit Court, except in instances of Administrative Review." SECTION TWO: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: F4".1121`MA PASSED and APPROVED this - day of ATTEST: Village Clerk — Village President - 3 - 1 1984. Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER TERRANCE L. BURGHARD FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1984 SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN PARKING At the Village Board meeting of February 7, 1984, the Board of Trustees deferred action on the matter of four-hour parking on Prospect Avenue until more information was available. The issue was raised by beauty salon operators in the area who have a problem with customers who require more than the current parking limit of two hours. The attached map indicates the parking requirements at the present time and the location of all hairstyling salons along Prospect Avenue. In a recent parking study conducted by Community Development staff, the occupancy rate for on - street parking in the Block from Main to Emerson was found to be 80-100%, as opposed to a 50-79% occupancy rate for the rest of Prospect Avenue. Therefore, this block is not well suited to long-term parking. Although the relocation of the Cab Stand will help to alleviate the congestion in this area, a four-hour parking zone on the northside of Prospect will not generate satisfactory turn -over rate for adjacent commercial establishments. Nevertheless, the beauty salon operators appear to have a legitimate problem and new locations for four-hour parking may be warranted. Therefore, I offer the following alternative locations: 1. The west side of Emerson Street from mid -block north to Prospect Avenue, which includes ten parallel parking spaces. 2. The east side of Emerson Street from mid -block north to Prospect Avenue, which includes 16 diagonal parking spaces. 3. The north side of Evergreen from Main Street to Wille Street, which includes eight parallel parking spaces. 4. The north side of Prospect Avenue from Main Street west to the existing eight-houring parking zone, which includes approximately 38 parallel parking spaces. 5. The north side of Prospect Avenue from Emerson Street east to the current eight-hour parking zone, which includes approximately 14 parallel parking spaces. Please note that any, all or none of these alternatives may be implemented, depending on the extent to which the Board would like to accommodate the beauty salons in the area. None of the listed alternatives are ideal, since the beauty establishments are dispersed throughout the downtown area. Nor is this list exhaustive, It does, however, include locations which require a customer to walk no more than two blocks to most of the Prospect Avenue beauty salons. JOHN M. BOWMAN JMB/rcw attachment ON -STREET PARKING - PROSPECT AVENUE 3 I CENTRAL z o } z a a I( W NORTH BUS 000000000 2 HR. PARALLEL PARKING A s a a s a 2 IiR. DIAGONAL PARKING 0 • • 00 8 HR. PARALLEL PARKING Beauty Salon Location �n 3 ti 0 EVERGREEN�� 10 Village of Mount Prospect ,Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: March 2, 1984 SUBJECT: Request for Waiver of Bids On January 16, 1984, one of our pool fleet vehicles caught on fire and subsequently has been declared a total loss. This vehicle was a 1984 Ford Escort wagon and it had less than 3,000 miles on it. Representatives from Ford Motor Co. and Gallagher Bassett have been involved in trying to establish liabilit' y in this case and unofficially Ford Motor Co. is denying any mechanical defect which would enable us to enter a warranty claim. Represen- tatives from Gallagher and Bassett are continuing the investigation of our claim and will try for a just settlement. Recognizing that settlement of any kind. with Ford Motor Co. is not emminent, Gallagher and Bassett has approved releasing funds to us on the value of the car so we may replace this vehicle as soon as possible. The normal bid process for a replacement unit takes 4 to 6 weeks on the average. To expedite the replacement, I would request that the bidding process be waived and we be allowed to order a new unit from a local dealership. Verbal quotes were solicited from 4 Chevrolet dealerships on a compact Chevrolet Cavalier wagon with all the same equipment. None of the cars quoted were painted our standard yellow and all quotes included trading in the fire damaged Ford wagon. Quotes as follows: *Don't repaint vehicles Deduct Base Purchase Quote__ Hoskin Chevrolet 7773.04 Lattof Chevrolet 7906.00 River Chevrolet 7922.46 Colonial Chevrolet 8243.00 *Don't repaint vehicles Deduct Add Purchase - TradeIn ....... .... R t Cost 1200.00 530.00 7103.04 1050.00 800.00 7656.00 900.00 850.00 7872.46 200.00 8043.00 Village Manager Request for Waiver of Bids Page 2 The cars as listed,above are currently in stock and final purchase price would be somewhat flexible in that further negotia- tions may result in further reductions or the vehicle quoted may no longer be in stock. lieri)ert L. Weeks HLW/bj g MINUTES u, THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ZBA Case No. 2-A-84 Hearing Date: January 26, 1984 Petitioner: Village of Mount Prospect Publication Date: January 6, 1984 Request: Text Amendment to create a new zoning district to be known as O -R (Office - Research) District Steve Park, Village Planner, presented the subject case stating that the proposed zoning district would permit a selection of uses which would not be allowed in any one existing zoning district. Mr. Park rioted that a list of permitted and special uses is attached to the request, including requirements for yards, height, and marking regulations. Mr. Bill Alter, 3000 Glenview Road, Wilmette, being a developer and property owner in the Village, gave a presentation on the benefits of such an O -R District, stating that there are several assembly type operations that are clean and not offensive in office type buildings, however the existing zoning ordinance does not permit that type of use. Mr. Alter also stated that when a prospective office building development is considered, having existing zoning would encourage consideration, rat -her than having to go through necessary variation proceedings. Mr. Alter also requested consideration be given to amend the draft text for O -R District to include: restricting O -R zoning for parcels of property in excess of one acre; permit sales and. limited service of products; allow for 2 buildings on property more than one acre I in size provided that both buildings remain under one ownership; to permit a height of 85 feet, rather than the 60 feet proposed; require additional parking for delivery trucks; provide for restaurant/hotel as an allowable special use. The subject of sallelite antenna was also brought up stating that it was the feeling of developers that 33 foot dishes be permitted on grade level in the O -R District. The majority of the Zoning Board of Appeals expressed their concern over the permitted 60 foot high buildings, since the existing ordinances only allow 30 feet. If a requirement was placed on the O -P District that only parcels of one acre or more could be considered, that might eliminate some concerns that a 60 foot high building could be built next to a single family district. Following discussion and in order to consider the suggestions made by both the members of the zoning Board of Appeals and Mr. Alter, it was the feeling of the members that staff should ZBA 2-Z-84 Page 2 of 2 amend the draft and re -submit the proposal to the Zoning Board of Appeals for further consideration. Mr. Viger, seconded by Mr. Petrucelli, moved to continue ZBA Case No. 2-A-84 to the next regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals scheduled for February 23, 1984. Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous Motion carried. Since this case has been continued to a date certain, no additional legal notice is required. Carol A. Fields Recording Secretary MINUTES OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ZBA 2-A-84 (Continued from January 26, 1984 ) Hearing Date: Feb. 21, 198 Petitioner: Village of Mount Prospect Request: Text Amendment to create a new zoning district to be known as O -R (Office -Research) District Steve Park, Village Planner, presented the case, noting that the text has been amended since the January 26th Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. It is proposed that this new district permit certain business uses, as listed on the attachment. Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals expressed concern that the proposed district would permit buildings 60 feet in height next to single family, residential districts. It was explained by staff that although O -R zoning would permit such development, all land would require a public hearing and re -zoning request before both the Zoning Board of Appeals and Village Board and that each request would be considered based upon location and impact on the surrounding properties. It was also recommended that the staff amend the draft language relative to transitional yard requirements in the O -R District when such proposed District would be located adjacent to single family zoning districts. Mrs. O'May, seconded by Mr. Bretragger, moved to recommend the proposed amendment to Chapter 14 to provide for an O -R District, subject to the comments as stated herein. Upon roll call: Ayes: Brettrager, Brothers, O'May, Petrucelli, Basnik Nays: Cassidy Absent: Viger Motion carried. Carol A. Fields Recording Secretary MINUTES OF .2 ZONING BOARD OF APPEA-- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ZBA Case No. 2-A-84 Hearing Date: January 26, 1984 Petitioner: Village of Mount Prospect Publication Date: January 6, 1984 Request: Text Amendment to create a new zoning district to be known as O -R (Office - Research) District Steve Park, Village Planner, presented the subject case stating that the proposed zoning district would permit a selection of uses which would not be allowed in any one existing zoning district. Mr. Park rioted that a list of permitted and special uses is attached to the request, including requirements for yards, height, and i.-,arking regulations. Mr. Bill Alter, 3000 Glenview Road, Wilmette, being a developer and property owner in the Village, gave a presentation on the benefits of such an O -R District, stating that there are several assembly type operations that are clean and not offensive in office type buildings, however the existing zoning ordinance does not permit that type of use. Mr. Alter also stated that when a prospective office building development is considered, having existing zoning would encourage consideration, rather than having to go through necessary variation proceedings. Mr. Alter also requested consideration be given to amend the draft text for O -R District to include: restricting O -R zoning for parcels of property in excess of one acre; permit sales and limited service of products; allow for 2 buildings on property more than one acre in size provided that both buildings remain under one ownership; to permit a height of 85 feet, rather than the 60 feet proposed; require additional parking for delivery trucks; provide for restaurant/hotel as an allowable special use. The subject of sallelite antenna was also brought up stating that it was the feeling of developers that 33 foot dishes be permitted on grade level in the O -R District. The majority of the Zoning Board of Appeals expressed their ' concern over the permitted 60 foot high buildings, since the existing ordinances only allow 30 feet. If a requirement was placed on the O -R District that only parcels of one acre or more could be considered, that might eliminate some concerns that a 60 foot high building could be built next to a single family district. Following discussion and in order to consider the suggestions made by both the members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Mr. Alter, it was the feeling of the members that staff should ZBA 2-Z 84 Page 2 of 2 amend the draft and re ---submit. the proposal to the Zoning Board of Appeals for further consideration. Mr. Viger, seconded by Mr. Petrticelli, moved to continue ZBA Case No. 2-A-84 to 'the next regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appealsscheduled for February 23, 1984. Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous Motion carried. Since this case has been continued to a date certain, no additional legal notice is required. Carol A. Fields Recording Secretary a/z4/a3 7/8/83 1z/z9/u3 I/4/84 b 2/lO/84 Article ~(O -R) Office/Research District The V -R, Office/Research District, provides an alternative to the retail oriented Business Districts and the Industrial District in the village of mount Prmapeot, Developments which provide for admini- strative offices or laboratories, research or product development facilities, with accessory warehousing, assembly or repair, may locate within the U -R District. a high level of site and structure design is required for this District to improve and maintain the property values and to encourage continued development *itblu the O -B District and on surrounding properties. Section �1. Permitted oeea and Special oaen A. Permitted Uses. In the m -R Office/Research District, the cnIInwiog uses may hereinafter be established, provided that the total gross fIcmc area devoted to light assembly, service and repair, and warehousing and storage shall not exceed seventy (70) percent of the total gross floor area of the building, and shall be located within a principal building, are: I. Data processing centers u. Computer and associated industries offices or facilities 3. Commercial banks and savings institutions. ~/ 4. Light assembly, product repair, and l `maleo facilities where the maximum gross floor 'area of such use obaII not exceed thirty (30) percent of the total gross floor area of the building/ and limited to the following: a. Advertising displays b. Camera and photo equipment, except film - manufacturing and processing C. Electronic products e. Precision instruments, such as optical, medical and drafting instruments -I - f. Other uses of a similar nature which are con- sistent with the intent of this Article ' 5. Offices for executive, administrative, sales, and pro- fessional purposes, excluding general busines�aod . medical offices. 6. Research laboratories and facilities, as defined in Article uXYI. 7. Uses accessory to those permitted in this Article, limited to: a, Warehouse and storage facilities where: l> The maximum gross floor area of any warehouse and storage facility shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the gross floor area of the building; and 2> No outside storage of material shall be pecmitted, b, Personnel training facilities associated with a permitted principal use. C. oft -street parking and loading as permitted and required by this ordinance. 8. Signs, insofar an may be permitted in this Chapter. 9. Any use of a similar nature to those permitted above, which are in keeping with the intent of this Article. B. The following uses may be allowed by special use permit issued in accordance with the provisions of Article VII of this ordinance: l. Public utility and service facilities 2. Drive -up windows in conjunction with financial institutions 3. Satellite antennae subject to the following: a. The maximum diameter of a dish ahoII not exceed thirty-three (3]} feet. b. The dish shall be located entirely behind the rear building line and shall be a minimum of twenty- five (25) feet from any lot line. C. Any dish shall be a minimum of ten (I0) feet from - 2 - a principal building or structure. d. The dish shall be ground mounted. Roof -mounted dishes are prohibited. e. The dish must be installed in pit or depression in such manner that no portion protrudes or extends above the ground level of the yard to a height greater than one-third (I/3) of the diameter of the dish. f. The pit in which the satellite antenna is in- stalled must be landscaped. Landscaping, in- cluding bermiog, and fencing shall be approved by the Department of Community Development. � 4. motel 5. Class I Restaurant Section ___.02. Lot and Bulk Regulations. A. minimum Front Yard: In the n -B Office/Research District, any building or structure hereafter erected shall be located not less than 38 feet plus one (l) foot for every two (2) feet of building height over twenty (20) feet, from the trout lot line (primary frontage). If becmiog, grade differences, and landscaped screening is provided, as approved by the Director of Community Development, packing may be permitted in all but the first twenty (20) feet of the required front yard, B. Minimum Side Yard; I. Interior Side Yard: In the o -R Office/Research District,ouy building or structure hereafter erected shall be located not lees than ten (lO) feet, plus one (l) foot for every two (2) feet of building height over twenty (20) feet, from any interior aide lot line. If parking or loading facilities or access drives are to be located in a side yard, such facility or drive shall be located a minimum of fine (5) feet from the side lot line, which area shall be properly screened. 2. Exterior Side Yard: In the o -u Office/Research District, any building or structure hereafter erected shall be located not less than thirty (30) feet, plus one (I) foot for every two (2) feet of building height over twenty (20) feetj from any exterior side lot line. If packing or loading facilities or access drives are to be located in a side yard, such facility or drive shall be located s minimum of fifteen (I5) feet from -3_ the side lot line, which area shall be properly screeoeu. C. Minimum Rear Yard: In the n -n office/Research District, any building or structure hereafter erected shall be located not Icus than twenty (20) feet, plus one (l) font for every two (2) feet of building height over twenty (20) feet, from a rear lot line. If parking or loading facilities or access drives are to be located in a rear yard, such facility or drive shall be located a minimum of ten (lV) feet from the rear lot line, vbiub area shall be properly screened. D. Transitional Yards: wbcze side or rear lot lines coincide with lot lines of property in a residential district, a transitional yard of not Ieoa that thirty (30) feet plus one � (l) foot for each two (2) feet of building height shall be provided. If parking or loading facilities or access drives are to be located in a transitional side or rear yard, such facility or drive shall be located a minimum of twenty five (25) feet from the lot line, which area shall be properly screened. ' Section �E�waximum Height: A. The maximum height of a building in the o -n office/Research District shall not exceed sixty feet (601). B. Federally licensed amateur radio operator's transmitting antenna towers with a maximum height of sixty <60> feet and such antenna tower structures having an overall height of not more than seventy (70) feet shall be excluded from the regulations contained in this Section. Section -04. Floor area Ratio: The maximum floor area ratio of buildings and structures on a zoning lot shall not exceed 1.0. Section .05.. Minimum Lot Area and Maximum Lot Coverage. Minimum lot area, if a separate lot, and building site area, if a e.n.o., shall be one (l) acre. A maximum of eighty (OO) percent of the lot area shall he covered by building, parking, or drives with the balance to be landscaped green space or surfaces such as plazas, sidewalks, terraces or patios as approved by the Director of Community Development. Section ____.06. outdoor Storage _ Prohibited. All storage of equipment, products and materials shall be maintained wholly within enclosed buildings. - 4 - Section _____.07,. Off -Street Parking and Loading. A. Parking. In the O -n, office/Research District, there shall be provided a paned off-street parking area sufficient in size to provide a minimum of one (l) packing space for each / two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of gross floor area ' of the building except that: ( / I. One off-street parking my shall be provided for each 1°500 square feet of'groms floor area or fraction thereof used for warehouse purposes; and 2. For any portion of any building used for a laboratory, data processing center" assembly, or product repair permitted in the o -R District: a. 0.8 spaces shall be provided for each person employed in the primary work shift operating in such portion of the building plus 0,5 spaces for each person employed in the work shift having the next largest number of employees, or, alternatively, b. one space for each 1,000 square feet of floor area or fraction thereof, whichever shall result in the calculation of the larger required number of spaces. 3. For any building having drive-through or drive -up facilities, stacking room shall be provided in the ratio of seven (7) spaces for each drive -up window or station. Such stacking spaces shall be exclusive of off-street parking spaces or maneuvering aisles. Any building having drive -ug facilities may reduce the required off-street parking for that use by ten percent 4. Parking shall be provided at the ratio of one (l) space for each one hundred and fifty (150) square feet of gross floor arca, or fraction thereof, for a Class z restaurant (conventional sit-down). 5. For any hotel facility parking obaII be provided at the ratio of one(l) aDuoe for each hotel unit plus parking, as required in this article, for other principal or accessory uses located in the structure. In calculation of required parking/ additional spaces shall be provided to allow for delivery, maintenance, sales, or other vehicles operated by the company and packed on-site. Parking spaces shall be provided immediately adjacent to any building, at the ratio of one (l) space for each twenty thousand (20,000) square feet of gross flour area, or _5_ fraction thereof, to be used and reserved for delivery vehicles. B. Off -Street Loading. In the O -R, Office/Research District sufficient off-street loading spaces obeII be provided on the premises so that on loading or unloading activity will be generated in any parking area or public zigbt-of-way. Off-street loading space(s) abaII be provided pursuant ^ to the following: l. For office uses a minimum one (l) off-street truck loading space shall be provided for each one hundred thousand (100°OUD) square feet of gross floor area or fraction thereof. 2^ For other uses, permitted in the O -R District,minimum off-street truck loading spaces shall be provided based � upon gross floor area in accordance with the following schedule: - Gra Minimum Square Foot Loading X IOOO -Spaces � - ]U l 3 - 100 2 lOU + 2 + 1/I00 or fraction Amend Section 14.2602.n. DEFINITIONS GROSS FLOOR AREA: The sum of the gross horizontal areas of all floors of a building, including principal and accessory uses and storage areas, as measured from the exterior face of the exterior walls For purposes of measurement for off-street parking and loading ~ and floor area ratios; gross floor area shall exclude: I. Areas used for storage of building mechanical and HVAC equipment, and 2. Interior parking areas, and 3. Interior loading docks but not including storage areas adjacent to loading docks. _6_ 8 RESEARCH LABORATORY: A building or group of buildings in which are located facilities for scientific research, investigation, testing or experimen- tation, development or research of products or of new and emerging technology, but not facilities for the manufacture or sale of products, except as incidental to the main purpose of the laboratory or as otherwise permitted in this Article. DEFINITIONS TO BE DELETED Delete existing Definitions in Section 14.2602.B.: Gross Floor Area, and Floor Area of a Building. - 7 - Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARDr VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR;/�`d SUBJECT: ZBA-2-84, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PROPOSED OFFICE/RESEARCH DISTRICT DATE: MARCH 2, 1984 This zoning case is the proposed Office/Research District that has been prepared by Village staff for the last number of months. The district concept was reviewed in the Fall by the Committee Of the Whole and has subsequently been completed and reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The district, as drafted, provides for the following: Permitted and special uses Lot and bulk regulations Maximum height Floor area ratio Minimum lot area and maximum lot coverage Prohibition of outdoor storage Off street parking and loading Related definitions The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the case at their meeting of January 26 and February 21, 1984. Mr. Bill Alter and his architect were present at the January 26 public hearing to present some concepts and concerns regarding the district. A number of these have been incorporated into the draft currently before the Board. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 5-1 in favor of recommending approval of the proposed amendment. The Zoning Board did suggest that alternate language be considered for the transitional yard requirement when the O/R District abuts single family residential zoning. KHF: hg Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: OFFICE/RESEARCH DISTRICT SUGGESTIONS FROM B. ALTER DATE: MARCH 2, 1984 The following list gives the changes suggested by Bill Alter and his architect, Duane Linden, regarding the Office/Research District at the January 26, 1984 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Increase assembly limit from 20% to 30% of floor area Add limited sales to repair and assembly permitted use Add use flexibility of "any similar use" as approved by staff Add restaurant and hotel as special use Increase minimum lot area to 1 acre Add provision for delivery vehicle parking Revise berming and landscape requirements for satellite dishes Increase permitted height to 85 feet KHF:hg Inqluded with modification (Section 01.A and 01.A.4.) Included (Section 01.A.4.) Included (Section 01.A.9.) Included with modification (Section 01.B.4. 5.) Included (Section 05.) Included (Section 07.A.) Not included - needs to be studied further together with other similar requirements Not included ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3323 DESIGNATING REPRESENTATIVES TO THE NORTHWEST SUBURBAN MUNICIPAL JOINT ACTION WATER AGENCY FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a member of the Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency, as authorized by Ordinance No. 3081; and WHEREAS, the Joint Action Water Agency Agreement and By -Laws require designated representation on the Executive Committee of said Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, II,LINOIS SECTION ONE: That SECTION FOUR of Ordinance No. 3323 is hereby amended by deleting the appointment of Jay Hedges as Alternate Member of the Executive Committee of the Joint Action Water Agency and substituting therefor as designated Alternate Member of the Executive Committee of said Agency Herbert L. Weeks. SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and -.e ffect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the mariner provided by law. ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this d<ry of 1984. ATTEST: . . ........ ....... Village Clerk Village President I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIII OF CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF' MOUNT PROSPECT__ . . ... . . ......... BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 18-1323 entitled "Parking in Municipal Parking Lots" of Article XIII of Chapter 18 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereafter said Section 18.1323 shall be and read as follows: ,I Sec. 18.1323. Parking in municipal Parking Lots. In any Municipal parking lot, be it owned, metered or leased by the Village of Mount Prospect, it shall be unlawful for any person: A. To park a vehicle in any area of such lot which is not designated (by lines or markings painted or placed on the pavement, wheel stops, etc.) as a parking space and/or which space has no parking meter or posted number adjacent thereto for the use thereof. B. To back a vehicle into any parking space thereof whenever signs have been placed in such lot which shall read "Park Facing Meter -- Do Not Back In" or "Park Facing Bumper -- Do Not Back In". C. To park a vehicle,other than those holding valid taxi cab licenses issued by the Village of Mount Prospect, in areas where signs are posted "No Parking - Taxi Stand". D. To park a vehicle in the Maple Street Municipal Parking I.,ot, located on t - lie east side of Maple Street between Lincoln Street and Prospect Avenue, between the hours of 1:00 AM and 5:00 AM. f, §EC.-TJO.N TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS - ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1984. ATTEST: age President -- ........ . ....... Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF' THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 1-8.2004 entitled "Schedule IV - Stop a n d Yield Signs" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by adding in proper alphabetical sequence the following: Name of Direction of At Intersection StreetTraffic Movement With .... .... . . ....... .... . ..................... Huntington East and Hunt Club Dr. Commons Rd. Westbound SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publi.cation in j..)amphlet form in the rianner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1984. Vi..Ilage President ATTEST: vi -d i a"' cue -..0 l e, -r, B'".._._...__......_.. ............- — - -------- .dTE5 Of THE MOUNT PROSPECT - ' - 5AFETY CDM�l3�IO� .^ - , - ^' February 6`1984 - I CALL TO ORDER Th �ting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. II ROLL CALL present upon roll call: Arthur Vice Chairman Lee u^en'ng, Secretary Tom Daley, Police Department James Hilliger, Fire Department Drew Johanson, Engineering Absent: Andrew Mitchell, Chairman Jackie Frank, Commissioner Also in attendance: Ms' Veronica Patt, Principal -St. Raymond's School Mark Hall& Todd Fink, Scout Troop #270 III APPROVAL ^ ' by James Hilliger moved to approve the Minutes of the ' regular meeting of the Safety Commission held on December 5, 1983' Motion was passed unanimously., IV OLD BUSINESS A. A request from Ma. Patt, Principal, St. Raymond Schnul 5 was reviewed' Ms. Patt's request had beentabled from the ` Safety Commission's lust meeting so a two week traffic — experiment, authorized by the-Vill'age Manager, could be conducted and reviewed. The experiment consisted of barricading southbound Elmhurst Avende between Milburn Avenue and Lincoln Street in addition to the enforcement of the existing parking restrictions in the area. Drew Johanson informed the Commtssion the results indicate that traffic problems or hazards dfd'not increase or decrease _ because of the experiment' Photographs were provided showing students are now crossing the median and the northbound lune to be picked up in vehicles parked along the east side of Elmhurst Avenue' The Commission was also informed that neither the police depart- ment or engineering had received'a,complaints relating to the experiment during the experiment-.-, - . � ~' seconded by _~, Village Board authorize the barricading of southbound Elmhurst Avenue between Lincoln and Milburn Avenue from 8:15 A.M. to 8:45 A Mand 2:30 P.�- to 3:00 P.M. when students are arriving and leaving ' school. UPON ROLL CALL: Ayes - Tom Daley, James Hilliger, Lee Beening, Art Nays - Drew Johanson ' t- V SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING.. February 6, 1984 Page 2 Motion was passed -.4 Ayes and 1Nay VI OTHER BUSINESS MILBURN/I-OKA A. Ms. Patt requested the 2 -hour parking restriction along 2 HOUR PARK the east side ofI-Oka Avenue and the south side of Milburn - -- Avenue adjacent to St. Raymond School be removed. Vice Chairman Coy requested the staff to review the minutes of the Safety Commission and Village Board Meetings to see where the original request for the present parking restrictions came from.'The Commission' also suggest prior to the removal of any restrictions, the homeowner adjacent to I -Oka and Milburn opinions should be obtained. This information well be Safety Meeting. P 5,1984 provided at the March Motion passed unanimously. VII ADJOURNMENT With no further business the Meeting was adjourned at 9.00 P.M. Respectfully submit' -led, rew'Ci.. W oFansonW -._,,,, ----- - _... DGJ/m MONDAY 'TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Ji Coffee with 3 i Elected official � 110:00 - Noon I Village Hall OPEN 9:00 - Noon !Limited Services I I U51 Board of Trustees 1Plan Commission 7 j s U10 Safety Commission * I 7:30 P.M. 8:00 P.M. 8:00 P.M.' iVillage Hail OPEN 9:00 - Noon ( [ i Limited Services ; _ iE.S.D.A. 7:30 P.M.* i i 12 i Committee of the 104 0 17)1 i Whole 7:30 P.M.I Library Meeting Room ; Village Hall OPEN 1 10 S. Emerson ; 9;00 - Noon Mt Prospect Police Limited Services Explorers 7:30 P.M.* E.S.D.A. 7:30 P.M.** I Ig ` F 2 Board of Trustees(3 (22)1, f 23 Plan Commission Zoning Board of ° 8:00 P.M.* $:00 P.M. Appeals 8:00 P.M.* i Village Hall OPEN j I 9:00 - Noon I = E Limited Services 1E.S.D.A. 7:30 P.M.** , 20 ' 27 Committee of the 2 20 30 i Whole 7:30 P.M. Library Meeting Room Village Hall OPEN 10 S. Emerson ! 9:00 - Noon Limited Services Mt Prospect Police IE.S.D.A. Ex lorers 7:30 P.M.* 7;30 P.M.** I s in April All meetings will be held in the Trustees' Room, 2nd floor SPECIAL NOTICE April 7, 1984 All Saturdays P Village Nail, 100 South Emerson Street, unless otherwise noted. j Coffee with Elected Village Hall OPEN "+ Board Room, 2nd floor, 112 E. Northwest Highway (j Officials 1000—Noon 9:00 — Noon Senior Citizen Center, 50 S. Emerson Street Lunch Room. Lower Level, Village Hall MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FEBRUARY 14, 1984 I. ROLL CALL Mayor Krause called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m., in the Mount Prospect Public Library Conference Room for the purposes of utilizing Cable TV. Present at the meeting were: Mayor Carolyn Krause, Trustees Ralph Arthur, Gerald Farley, Leo Floras, Norma Murauskis, George Van Geem and Theodore Wattenberg. Also present at the meeting were: Village Manager Terrance Burghard, Administrative Assistant to the Village Manager John Bowman, -Director of Management Services David Jepson and Village Comptroller Richard Jesse. There were 22 persons in the audience. II. OPENING REMARKS Mayor Carolyn H. Krause introduced to the audience the purpose the series of Budget Hearings. 'The Mayor pointed out that with the advent of Cable TV in the community and the municipal government having access to channel 63 for communication with its residents, it was the consensus of the Mayor and Board of Trustees that the Budget Hearings should be carried -live on Cable TV to maximize participation of the community. The Mayor outlined the forthcoming dates for subsequent Hearings and the procedures to Ne followed by the Committee of the Whole in conducting *its meetings. MIRMIAM The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of January 24, 1984 were accepted and filed. IV. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD There being no citizens present at the meeting desiring to make any presentation before the Committee of the Whole, the Mayor moved on to the next item of business. V. 1984-1985 BUDGET HEARING Village Manager Terrance Burghard presented an overview of the Budget indicating that the total Program of Services for fiscal year 1984-1985 is estimated at $22,320,000. This compares to a Budget of last year of $19,381,000. The proposed 15% increase is funded through reserves or planned revenues to meet the objectives established by the Mayor and Board of Trustees in prior years. 11 Magor items anticipated in the Budget are Water System improvements, Flood Control, improvements, significantly increased Roadway improvements and an anticipated rate increase in the Refuse Contract, The Village Manager also pointed out that the Budget as recommended proposes a moderate decrease in the General Fund "Tax Levy, a decrease in the overall Village Tax Rate and an anticipated rebateofProperty Tares in December of 1984. There are no new taxes, fees or service charges proposed in the Budget. The Committee of the Whole then reviewed charts prepared by the Village staff showing category breakdown of expenditures, distribution among various classifications of expenditure, personnel staffing profiles and capital expenditure Listings„The Village Manager pointed out that the staffing pattern proposed in the Budget is still some eight fewer employees than the Village had in 1975. David Jepson,, Finance Director, then reviewed with the Committee of the Whole the anticipated revenues and the financial position of the Village of Mount Prospect. Mr. Jepson pointed out the anticipated"usage of surpluses accumulated through Special Service District #5, Motor Fuel Tax Fund and the Flood Control Bond Issue. Where then followed a general discussion on the part of the Mayor and Board of Trustees inquiring about the proposed Water Rate changes, the methods of assuming growth in retail sales tax and changed Budget formats. Village Manager Terrance Burghard reviewed the proposed Program of Services for Public Represen ation'and Village Administration, This included expenditures for Advisory Boards and Commissions, the Mayor and hoard of Trustees, Village Manager's office, General Counsel, salary adminis- tration, Village Prosecutor and Special; Counsel. The Committee of the Whole inquired as to the Budget needs for Special Counsel in representing Village residents in proposed water and sewer rate increases by Citizens Utilities of Illinois. Finance Director Dave Jepson than reviewed the programs contained in the Department of Management Services including accounting, data processing, cash management, insurance and the Village Clerk's office. -2- Mr. Jepson pointed out that there are moderate increases in various categories of expenditure and highlighted the first payment and research necessary to incorporate a new telephone system for the Village, new filing systems and some added computer equipment. Considerable time was spent on reviewing the Insurance Programs of the Village and comparing the proposed costs to the Village's costs in IRMA and to historical costs. Insurance Program is to be established in a Risk Management account and will cover General Liability, Workers' Compensation and Health and Life Insurance. Mr. Jepson also presented additional data to the Committee of the Whole showing the source and usage of funds, explaining the accounting changes and projecting increases for the forthcoming year. Additionally, a report from Duncan and Associates, our administrator for the Self -Insured Health Program, was distributed to the Committee of the Whole giving comparisons of the Village's cost to industry's standards and to other communities; one larger and one smaller than the Village of Mount Prospect. A general discussion ensued regarding insurance, the Village's Safety Program and the Village Newsletter. Administration was also presented information from Trustee Arthur aggregating the return on investment of Village cash balances since 1980. Trustee Arthur inquired and the Committee of the Whole concurred that the staff should look more closely at its Budget projections for investment income. Additionally, the staff was , requested to evaluate the advertising component of the Village Newsletter. If advertising is not producing sufficient funds or is consuming an inordinate amount of time, then the advertising portion should be abandoned. Mayor Krause then summarized the activity for the evening reviewing various aspects of the proposed Budget and re- stated the forthcoming Budget Hearings to be carried live on Cable TV. VI. DOWNTOWN FACADE PROGRAM Kenneth Fritz, Director of Community Development, introduced the Committee of the Whole to the recommended architectural, firm to implement the Downtown Facade Improvement Program. Mr. Fritz pointed out that this Program had been adopted by the Mayor and Board of Trustees previously by Ordinance and it will provide Grants to business owners and building owners who desire to upgrade their facade. The Grants will be funded by the Community Development Block Grant Program and will offer matching Grants up to $5,000 for interesteM parties. -3- U1.1. Z112, L, The Committee of the Whole reviewed a rendering prepared by Planning Resources, Inc., the recommended firm. Mr. Fritz pointed out that they bad solicited proposals from eight architectural firms. Those submittals then were refined to three prospe,cts and each was interviewed, One firm proposed a fee of'$3,500'plus expenses and this firm was rejected because ofthe open-ended nature of the expense item. Another firm proposed an upset figure Of $9,500 and that was rejea_,ted ",is being too expensive. The staff is recommending, that the Village hire Planning Rr esources, Inc., fors a fixed feeof $6,560 for the development of the planning guidelines, The Committee of the Whole concurred in this recommends - tion and directed the staff to piace this item on the next Village Board Agenda. VII. SOLICITATION REGULATIONS The,Village Manager reviewed the legal opinion prepared by Dave Newman, Village General Counsel. Mr. Newman pointed out that the IT. S. Supreme'Court as well as numerous other Courts have indicated through their rulings that Virst Amendment Freedoms tal<e precedence over local regulations. The municipality can, propose reasonable regulations cotitrolling, the t3.Me but cannot forbid or unreasonably regulate so,licitors and canvassers. The Courts have determined that the point of decision on solicitors must rest with the individual homeowner and property owner and solicitors who violate that decision can then be taken to Court for trespass violations. After some further general discussion, the Committee of the Whole directed that the Ordinance as recommended by the Village attorney be presented at the subsequent Village Board meeting for the normal procedure. VIII.MANAGER'S REPORT The Village Manager reported that the bids for the O'Hare Transmission Main are to be opened or). February 15 and after those bids are tabulated, information will., be presented to the Mayor and Board of Trustees, IX. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meet at 9:45 ,m® Respectfully submitte TERRANCE L. BURGITARD Village Manager TLh/rcw was adlourned "WIli 11111-1 -7- IV, Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held January 17, 1984. Upon roll call: Ayes: ' Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murrauskis, Wattenberg Nays:' None Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS APPROVE BILIS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to approve the :following list of bills: General Fund $ 639,863.26 Revenue Sharing Fund 6,071.58 Motor Fuel flax Fund 10,011.46 Community Development Block Grant 21,361.71 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 21, 234.91 Water & Sewerage Fund; Operations & Maintenance 148,570.13 Parking System Revenue Fund 1,966.86 Capital Improvement, Repair or Replacement Fund 42,230.35 Contractors Surety & Sidewalk Fund 300.00 Trust Fund 10,544.97 $902,155.23 Upon roll call; Ayes; Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays; None Motion carried. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE BEARD None MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Carolyn Krause proclaimed the week of February 5-11, 1984 SCOUTING WEEK as Scouting Anniversary Week in the Village'of Mount Prospect. MINUTES OF THE REG(JJA.R MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FEBRUARY 7, 1984 ('ATT TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Mayor Krause called the meeting to order at 8:03 P.M. INVOCATION INVOCATI0N The invocation was given by Trustee Flaros. ROLL CALL ROLL CALL Present upon roll call:' Mayor Carolyn Krause Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Gerald Farley Trustee Leo -Floras Trustee Norma Murauskis Trustee Theodore Wattenberg Absent: Trustee George Van Geem There were 17 citizens present at this Board Meeting. APPROVAL OF [ NL)TES APPROVE MINuTEs Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held January 17, 1984. Upon roll call: Ayes: ' Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murrauskis, Wattenberg Nays:' None Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS APPROVE BILIS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to approve the :following list of bills: General Fund $ 639,863.26 Revenue Sharing Fund 6,071.58 Motor Fuel flax Fund 10,011.46 Community Development Block Grant 21,361.71 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 21, 234.91 Water & Sewerage Fund; Operations & Maintenance 148,570.13 Parking System Revenue Fund 1,966.86 Capital Improvement, Repair or Replacement Fund 42,230.35 Contractors Surety & Sidewalk Fund 300.00 Trust Fund 10,544.97 $902,155.23 Upon roll call; Ayes; Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays; None Motion carried. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE BEARD None MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Carolyn Krause proclaimed the week of February 5-11, 1984 SCOUTING WEEK as Scouting Anniversary Week in the Village'of Mount Prospect. AK'ND CH. 13 DELETE CLASS "L Ti—tee Floras, seconded by 'Irust=e Murauskis, moved for LIQUOR LICENSE passage of Ordinance No. 3392, providing for the deletion CLASSIFICATION of Class "L" liquor license classification effective May 1, 1984. ORD. NO.3392 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floras, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. DECREASE CLASS "S"LIQUOR An Ordinance was presented for first reading decreasing the LICENSE Glass "S" liquor licenses by one due to Red Lobster„ 2200 S. RED LOBSTER Elmhurst Road, closing. Trustee'Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Arthur, mowed to waive the rule requiring two readings on an ordinance in order to take action on the subject ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur Farley, Floras, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: Nome Motion carried. ORD.NO. 3393 Trustee Floras, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 3393 AN ORDINANCE AN1E 7DING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VITIAM CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floras, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. MOIQ`I'EREY WHALING A Request from new owners of Monterey Whaling Village, 'VILLAGE 999 North Elmhurst Road, for a, liquor license was presented LIQUOR LICENSE by the Mayor. The present goners hold a Class'"S" liquor ESTABLISHMENT license. OYQNERSHIP CHANCE Since a representative from VIOORP was not present, this request was continued to the February 21,1984 Board mce-eting. ENERGY AUDIT A Resolution was presented that encouraged the residents mm to participate in the energy audit by filling out the application to be distributed with the Newsletter in an effort to pinpoint areas that could sage energy and related costs. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg moved for passage of Resolution No. 3-84 RES. NO. 3-84 A RESOLUTION DECTARI]VG MARCH, 1984, AS "ENERGY AUDIT MONTH" IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floras, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. DRUNK DRIVING A Resolution was presented that expressed the Village's support for legislation that would prohibit the use of federal highway funds for those states having a drinking age of less than 21. February 7,1984 Page Two w Under the Consent Decree governing the Old Orchard Colony Country, the Village Manager, Terrance'Burghard is allowedto make certain field changes. Due to impact it could have on the neighbors, the Village Manager denied the field changes. The Manager stated that Fred_iani could take his proposal to the Zoning Board of Appeals which would require public hearings, thereby informing the residents. Page Three February 7, 1984 Trustee Farley, seconded'ny Trustee Floras moved for passage of Resolution No. 4-84 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF H.R. 2441 RES. NO. 4-84 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floras, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ANNOUNCEMENTS AMNO None APPOINTMENTS None APPOINTMENTS OLD BUSINESS Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of INCREASED Ordinance No. 3394, setting forth the increased water rate effective V PER RATE May 1, 1984 as well as providing for billing every two months instead AMEND CH. 22 of quarterly. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22 ORD. NO. 3394 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance was Presented for first reading providing for "No Left .AMEND CHAPTER 18 Turn" at specified intersections on I -Oka and authorizes a 4 way STOP (TRAFFIC CODE) at I -Oka ancx Sunset. I-OKA AND SUNSET Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur moved to waive the rule requiring two readings on an ordinance in order to take action on the proposed Traffic Code amendment, Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Notion carried. Trustee Floras, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 3395 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) ORD. NO. 3395 Upon roll call:... Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floras, AMEND CH. 18 Nhirauskis Nays: Wattenberg Motion carried. VIIL,ACE MANAGER'S REPORT Field changes have been denied for the proposed development within OLD ORCHARD'S Old Orchard's Colony Country because Frediani's proposed 3-3 story 001laNY COUNTRY buildings depart from the original plans which calls for 2 buildings. FIELD CHANGES Under the Consent Decree governing the Old Orchard Colony Country, the Village Manager, Terrance'Burghard is allowedto make certain field changes. Due to impact it could have on the neighbors, the Village Manager denied the field changes. The Manager stated that Fred_iani could take his proposal to the Zoning Board of Appeals which would require public hearings, thereby informing the residents. Page Three February 7, 1984 30S"INESS ZBA 1-A-84 ZEA 1-A-84 TEXT AMENDM= This case proposed amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance, RECORDING Chapter 14, to delete the requirement; that a court reporter COURT REPOFTER take official minutes. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended 5-2 to, grant the text amenclTwant. Currently transcripts are .required for all zoning cases which has become a very time consuming and costly requirement. In an effort to speed up the cases and reduce the coast to petitioners the transcript requirement would be removed. The substitution of summary minutes would be prepared by a recording secretary. There would also be cassette tapes in a fall:-back position for more detailed study of the meeting. The petitioner would still be given the option of a courtreporter if they so desired and were willing to pay for the service separately. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur,moved to concur with the reconuendation of the Zoning' Board of Appeals and grant the requested text amendment. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, . Muraziskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Nation carried. ZBA 4-Z-84 ZBA 4-Z-84,-5 SU-84, 6 V-84 ZBA 5-SU-84 This request dealt with the development of a vacant parcel with ZBA 6-V-84* 5 buildings, -including a self-serve car wash, all buildings dealing with auto case ZBA 4-Z-84 requests the re=zoning of subject property from B-3 to B-4 Z13A 5-SU-84 requests a Special Use in the nature of a Planned Unit Development. ZBA 6-U=84 requests variations from 14.2102.0 to reduce rear yard from the required 20 feet to 0; 14.2101.A.1 parking regulations to permit fewer, parking spaces as it applies to the car wash; 1`4.2105.B. to eliminate the requirement for off-street truck loading spaces.'' Mr. Kostakos, representing', the petitioner (ENSREC CORP.) presented the proposed project stating that the property would be developed with five-one-story buildings, all of which would. provide some type of vehicle maintenance facility, including a self-serve car wash. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the requests in ZBA 4-Z-84 2,BA'5-SU-84 and ZBA 6-V-84. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Ordinances will be presented February 21, 1984 ;for first reading. MOVE TAXI A request to amend the Traffic Code to remove the posted "Taxi STOPS INSIDE Stand"" area on Prospect Avenue from Emerson to Main and provide DEPOT LOT 6 spaces within the, train station parking lot. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Watteiberg moved to recommend a change in the Traffic Code and remove the posted "°Taxa. Stand." area from Emerson to Main and provide 6 spaces within the train station parking lot. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murax skis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. February 7, 19$4 Page Four A a'eqllest to establish 4 hour parking on the north side of Prospect 4 HOUR PARKING Avenue, bet ween Emerson and Pine street, instead of the existing 2 NORTH SIDE OF 1;1:;Iurs was presented. PROSPECT BETWEE The 1&'Wor and Board of TrusteeSpostpEMERSON & PINE oned attaching a parking time rest fiction on the the North side Of Prospect Avenue, between Emerson and Pine Street. The existing parkingt , is two hours e 1�yropc.,� ed t" is our and th . s tize. was for four hours. lbe Board of Trustees decided to postpone giving' a sg>ecific time regulation until the needs of the nearby store-, was deterndned. This request was continued to: -the February 21st Board meeting. A Resolution was presented for an annual renewal of the Agreenx-nt-to provide Evergency services to the Forest River Fire Protection District. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur moved for passage of Resolution No. 5-84 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN,, AGREE�ffNT FES.NO.5-84 BETWEEN 'THE FOREST RIVER FIRE PRDIECTION DISTRICT AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floras, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that is required yearly by IDOT and permits the Village of Mount Prospect to do various types of work on roadways under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur moved for passage of Resolution No. 6-84 A RESOLUTION FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS RES.NO.6-84 BY-THE-VILLA(IRE OF MOUNT PROSPECT UNDER THE ILLINOIS HIGHMY CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Flores, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance was presented for first reading bringing local ordinances CURFEW FOR into conformity with State statutes, setting the curfew laws for minors MINORS under the age of 17. A24EM CH. 23 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings on an ordinance in order to take action on the subject ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried Trustee Arthur, seconded by -Trustee Wattenberg moved for passage of Ordinance No. 3396 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE VI ENTITLED "MINORS" OF ORD.NO.3396 CHAPTER 23 OF THE VILLAGE OODE OF MOUNT pRoSpE(7T, ILLINOIS Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros.- Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page Five February 7, 1984 RES.NO 7-84 A Resolution was presented authorizing„an agreement between the city of Rolling Meadcws and the Village of Mozmnt Prospect in order to provide plumbing inspection services to our Village Trustee Arthur, seconded by TrusteeWattenberg moved for passage of Resolution No. 7-84 A RESOLUTION 'AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGRMMENT,- BE"I't EE.N THE CITY OF ROLLJNG MEADC7WS AND THE VIILAM OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PLUMING INSPECTION SERVICES Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murausks, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. February 7, 1984 Page Six PLAT OF FAST UTILITY Trustee Arthur', seconded by Trustee Wattenberg moved to authorize EASEMENT° the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest her signature on the Plat of WITHIN Easement within the Blackhawk Subdivision. These, utility easements, BLACKLIM nm along the property lines of homes between Blackhawk and Busse SUBDIVISION Road and are required for maintenance of storm and sanitary sewers within the Blackhawk Subdivision. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Airauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion,carried.' PLAT OF, VACATION PLAT OF This plat vacates a parcel of land, Waverly Street extended, VACATION located between Ionnquist Blvd. and the Mount Prospect Golf rSince WAVERLY Course, previously dedicated for a roadway. the Village EXTENDED has no plans,to extend.tNe, roadway, this will place the property back on the tax rolls. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg moved to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk.to'attest her signature on the Plat of Vacation. Upon roll call:. Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,', Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. BUDGET Jobn Coleman;, member of the Cable' Commission ' stated that the HEARINGS Budget Hearings will be telecast from the rax:)±° on four nights on Channel 63 and be recorded. ADJOURN ADJCN.TRNMENT Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Farley moved to adjourn the meeting. , Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley., Floros, e Murauskis, 1gattexjrerg. .. Nays: None Motion carried.. The meeting Was adjourned at 9:10 P.M. CAROL A. FIELDS VILLAGE CIFM February 7, 1984 Page Six