HomeMy WebLinkAbout2389_001MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE
MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
March 14, 1972
............
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor, Telchert called the meeting to order at 8:15 P. M*
10
INVOCATION
Trustee Monroe gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll cal I 4-k Ahern Anderson Furst Monroe
Richardson Scholten Tei chert
CASE NO. 65CH5300 - OLD ORCHARD
Mayor Tei chert cal I ed thi s special meed ng for possi bl e
action to authorize the Mayor and Village Attorney to
sign an amended Consent Decree in Case No. 65CH5300,
Chicago Title and Trust Company, Trustee under Trust
Agreement dated May 4, 1955 and known as Trust No. 37533,
Plaintiff vs. Village of Mount Prospect, a municipal
corporation , Defendant.
Exhibits were presented and discussion followed regarding
placement of sidewalk. along the north side of Rand Road.
Trustee Anderson, seconded by Trustee Monroe, moved to
construct a 5 foot sidewalk on the public right-of-way
or a three foot sidewalk on the private property --in any
event, the sidewalk to be constructed within ten feet of
the property line --at the discretion of the administration,
dependi ng on the ci rcumstances at the ti me i t i s to be i n-
s tat 1 e d .
Upon roll call: Ayes Ahern Anderson Furs t M o n r o e
Richardson Scholten
Motion carried,.
The next topic under discussion was the proposed width of
Schoenbeck Road. Trustee Anderson, seconded by Trustee
Scholten,, moved to provide for a 43 foot back-to-back base
Road on Schoenbeck Road , wi th a 57 foot maxi mum at the ap
proaches to both Rand Road and Camp McDonal d Road for a
distance of 200 feet.
Upon roll call: Ayes Ahern Anderson Furst Mon roe
Richardson Schol ten
Motion carried.
Next under consideration was the gravity off-site sanitary
sewer. After soil borings were made on the east side of
Elmhurst Road it appeared that location was the most suit-
able for laying of pipe. It was further suggested by the
developer that the water main also be placed in the same
trench at a different depth. It was agreed to cross over
a twelve -inch line at Oxford from the third manhole and a
ten -inch line from the fifth manhole to Meadow Lane. T h e s e
drawings were to be marked as Exhibit "W'. Al 1 mains are
to be dedicate -d to the Village with the understanding that
from the main to the building would be maintained by the
owner.
These items will be incorporated in' the redraft i*ng of the
Consent Decree to place in language in conforffencewith the
discussion and accompanying exhibits would be modified to
comply with the previous motions.
Trustee Furst, seconded by Trustee Richardson, moved to
approve the amended Consent Decree in Case No. 65CH5300 in
conformance with discussions and motions passed by this
Board.
Upon roll call: Ayes Ahern Anderson Furst Monroe
Richardson Scholten
Motion carried.
Trustee Furst, seconded by Trustee Ri chardson , moved to
authorize the Mayor and Village Attorney to sign a formal
Consent Decree to that effect.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Ahern Anderson Furst Monroe
Richardson Scholten
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Furst, seconded by Trustee Scholten , moved the
meeting be adjourned. Time: 9:50 P. M. Unanimous.
MARIE T. HARD, Deputy Clerk
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Trustee Donald Furs t Cha i rma n Finanqe Commi ttee
FROM Mayor Robert Tei chert
DATE: March 23, 1972
A concl u on that had been apparently reached at your vari crus
meetings concerning business license fees was that we should
have a schedule of fees based on actual services rendered to the
individual business establishments. There appeared to be un -
ani mi ty i n the concept that costs di rectly attri butabl e to the
bUSi ness establ 1 shments shoul d, at I east i n part. e recovered
from those establ I shments . The di f f i CL11 ty i n al 1 ocati ng the
cost factors was in working Out an equitable system of distributing
these costs to the indi'videal licensees.
The admi,nistration has "been most helpful in working on this problem
so as to present a forMUla for the business license fees which I
am hopeful the Board will -find acceptable. Existing business
establishments were "eye -balled" for an estimate of square footage
and the variOLIS licenses kqere tnen categorized in grOLIDs based on
square footage Thi's grOUping is sho �qn in the attached schedule.
The grOUping, whi le somelr
vihat arbitary in 'ts manner of proc
0 1 gressi on ,
is designed to accommodate the proportionate spread of the
4
licensees in each group as well as relating the groups progressively
to the related factor of increased time for fire inspections.
I am Sure there i s no groUp.i ng by square footage that wl I I pl ease
everyone and accordingly there will undoubtedly be those �qho
qUesti on the propri ety of thi s speci f i c, grOLIpi ng . I can onl v
say that i t does not appear to he mani festly i nequi tabl e and
i t does spread the costs of the Fi re Inspection Bureau i n a
manner so that those establishments reqUiring more extensive
inspections pay a higher proportion of the cost. I migh t say
that in working jq i th thi s schedUl e i n rel ati onshi p to OUr estimates
of sqUare footage, the total dollars received by the Village
woul d provi de I ess than 50% of- the costs attri butahl e to f i re
inspection of business establishments. It is not intended that
thi s formul a be accepted as establ 1 shi ng a poll I cy that the
Vi I I age adopt a 50% publ 1 c benef i t factor,, Il -he facts o f the
matter are that the schedul e 1 n i ts present form and rel ated to
the regi strati on fee , heal th fees , and speci al fees wi 11 CUMUl ati vely
prodUce -LI-.he aMOUnt of I i cense revenue we are presentlY oh- tai ni ng .
Heal th fees are establ i shed at $10 per i nspecti on and are cate-
gori zed as to busi ness reqUi ri ng 2 3 or 6 1 nspecti ons per year.
This appears to offer an 80% recovery of costs directly' attribut-
able to the sanitarian's inspections . Ag a -i n -1L.-h i s i s not mea n t
to establ ish a 20% bene fi t factor on the part o-',7 the Via 11 age
but rather to establ ish an eqUi tabl e base for spreading costs
a
which �qlll CUMUlatively provide the same licensing revenue kAie
are now obtaining.
0
T 0 -
Trustee Donald Furst, Chairman
Finance Committee
The last category of license fees can best be termed specialties.
T
1his involves businesses which because of their mode of operation
or the type of premises involved reqUi re speci fic, services over
and above the normal fire inspections and heal th i nspecti ons
in order to properly protect the COMMUnity in the areas of
health and safety. ..and in some instances the regul ati on factor
may be o ri en ted to ancl" 11 ary con s 1 dera t i ons S Lich a s e s th eti cs 5
policing, etc. The fees set forth i n the special ties category
kqO U 1 d be complete I n themselves and would excl ude that specif ied
bUSiness from a specific charge or registration fee, fire
i nspection fee, or health fee.
Y 0 U V11
note that there is a basic registration fee of $10.
This is sufficient to cover the basic costs related to process -
a
1 nq
docurnen tati on and f I I i nq of the bus i nes s I i cuss There
may be some excess 1 n thi S EIMOUnt but i f there i s i t can be
Cs 1 do -red d- i red toaddi ti ncal regUl atOl'-,,/ f-Uncti ons hic1 at
t h 1* S p 0 i n �' e h (-,.i v e n o t c o m 1) 1, e -1,'. e I y d e f i n P d e. g o u r o r d i nc-i noes
requi re the RLli 1 d ng Depai-ti-nent to make an anneal inspecGion of
CRI I signs Used ii -i C' 0 nj U n C" t, I o n i I 'L-, h -'he busi ness establichi-iients,
A-
in our communi(,N". I n t h i s respect
I S h 0 U I d It i k e t o p o n t o u t
that inasmuch as this is 0 Ll I -I r s t a t, t e iii r t t o a s c e r t a i n e q i i I a t o r y
cos ts we a re not at al 1 s ure that we hiave been abl e to i denti T Y
or isolate SI ch costs at this time.
Recognizi ng that this is our fi rst attempt to confine business
license fees to regulatorY costs there are some important factors
to be considered I:
T his restructuring of a fee schedule is not designed
to increase our present licensing revenue...it is,
6
in fact, estilmated to produce the same amount we
now receive.
(2) The total amount of license fees which the Village
will collect will in no way cover the entire cost
e x p e n d e d b y t h e V i I I a g e i n r e ci t 11 a t i n q b u s 41 n asses
mt �Al 0 tAl i
y best estimate at this time s tha
recover roughly 50% of the total costs involved.
I
(3) The purpose o-�F- this f*rst revamping is not to
increase revenue nor to recover the ful I costs
but rather to redistribute the proportionate
11 4
burden in relation to the regulation req irements
-4:
lor specc businesses,,-.��,jh-ile overall revenUe
�'Iill not increase, there will be some businesses
that wil I Pay MUCh larger fees than they have in
the past whi le other bus',1 nesses wi I I pay less than
they have in the past, This, 0-41' course, is 1, -he
reSL(lt of changing from an ai - b i t r a ry -IF-e e s c h e d u I e
0
TO: Trustee Donald Furst, Chairman
Finance Committee
to a schedule where costs are allocated in pro -
Porti on to cervi ces rendered .
We should not be deluded into believing that we can ever establish
a bus ness license fee which wi 11 win the approval of the entire
business community in candor, I doubt that we could ever
adopt any fee structure which would even please the majority of
the busi nessmen . Thei r rel uctance to pay fees i s qui to under-
standable and is really no different than every citizen's
't'on to the payment of taxes. We all know that government
oppos 1 1
can only recover i ts cos ts through taxati on of the c i ti zeas i n
one form or another. Obviously our primary obligation is to
see that it is done fairly. Whether our ci ti zens as a community
should underwrite less or more of the regulatory costs as we
now k,.now them is a matter that the present propo,sal Puts off for
the fUture. The proposed schedU I e of fees is merely a means of
re -allocating the present fee revenue. I believe it to be• a
fair and logical approach and WOUld urge that it be adopted
for implementation this year.
In this respect, and recognizing Your rather hectic schedule
as wel 1 as Your neces s i ty f or he i ng out of to wn I have taken
the libert
y of placing this matter on the agenda for TUesday,
March 28, as a matter of institUting pLlbl ic, discussion. T h i s
i s i n reco g n i JLJ an o f the v i rtUa 1 i MDOS S i b i 1 i ty 0 f VO Ur Commi ttee
Squeezing 1 n additional hearings at this time. Wi th a n i n 1 ti a I
pUbl ic hearing (not for detailed debate bUt rather to *nsti tUte
reaction from the business Community), and a second PLIblic
hearing for Board action at the regular Board meeting on April 18.
In the intervening period the Chamber of Commerce, 1 ndividual
bLISinessmen, etc. , can COMMUni cate their views to the Board
members and, if necessary, a Committee of the Whole meeting
COUld be undertaken the week of April 10. In any event, I
will hold myself open for diSCUSSiOnS on this subject, as I
am sure the various members of the administration wi 11 -
1 00,
10.
Robert D. Tei chert
M a y o r
RDT-.msw
attachment
ARTICLE XXXI General Provisionsl Including Fees
Section 11.3101. Nuisances. No business, occupation, or activity --
licensed unde-F—th-.'sor not -- shall be conducted or operated so
as consti
tute a nuisance or so as to amount to a nuisance in fact.
to
section 11.3102. Ins ections.
A. When,ever i*,,nspeCt,,i,*,Ons of the Prennuses, vehicles, equipment,� or
methods of oper,ation, pis ed in conductina a licensed business�
is
o,ccupati`on, or activity are air't orozed or required by tho
�4,tin,icipal. Code or are reasomably, 'necessary to secure compliance
141. t1i a, ny Ii i,on o., th,, 11s, 1%tun c pal Code or to detect v'ola
p r
tions thereof i I , t, s h a 1 be the d'uty of the licensee or person
ipment, or methods of
in charge of such premises, vehicles� equo
operation to permit, at any reasonable tir,"ieg any officer or em-
ployee of the �Tiliage of Tviount Prospect i,4ilio 'is authorized or
directed to make such inspections to be admitted to such premises,
to have access to such vehicles or equi"I'lent, and to observe such
methods of operation for t1le purpose of i,,tiakin.g said inspections
B Whenever an an,-,alys 'is of any commodity, or matcrial is reasonably
necessary to secure conformance witli ' any provision of this Muni-
cipal Code or to detect violations ti-ierec ,
)f.) it shall be the duty
of the licensee, upon request, t-0 give any authorized officer or
employee of the Village of Mount Prospect requesting the same
suffit.'Hent, samples of such material or commodity for such analysis,#
C I.n addition to any other penalty which may be provicled, the
Village Manager may revoke the license of any licensee who refuses
to permit any such officer or emp],10'Y(,'C. 1")
take such samples of i-iiaterial or coi,,rUi1,odJ,,ty, or, iAlh,o t f),
such off icer or employee while in, tlje p e r f o, rmw-ai"ic c� 0 f
on,
0,,yr t -J�
making such inspections'; provided, l'i3O,A I
proceeds in the if'ianner set forth in 10 o f s (
5ection 11.3103. Posting License,, It shall be the C1 U ty of any person
lo' 1,1, .1,age of Mount Prospect to keep his
CoEduc,��i g a t)usiness in
license certificate or sticker at all times in a prominent place on
the premises used for such business, occi..ipa-Clion, or activity.
j &I - d
Section 11. 3104. license Fees. Where no fee has been les ignate
c
or 111 this Municipal Code for zpecific pro-
fessions ablishments
_, occupations, businesses,, and/or commercial estc
wherein such professions, occupations, businesses, and/or commercial
establishments are in fact regulated elsewhere within this Chapter or
i 'thin e
this Municipal Code, the yearly fees for licnses to permit
kil 01
the operation of such professions, occupations, businesses., and/or
UN
commercial establishments -in the Village of Mount Prospect shall be
computed as follows:
Designation
A All of such profess ions ,occupations, businesses, and/or
'L
commercial establishments shall pay a $10.00 basic com-
ponent fee to cover the processing, documentation, and
0,
filing of their application and licenses
14 1
B Such profess ions., occupations bus inesses, anct/or com..
mercial establishments Ohl ch have an established place
of business within the corporate limits of the Village
of Mount Prospect shall be assessed an additional com-
ponent fee to cover the cost of enforcement of safety
regulations including fire prevention., iqliiQh component
fee shall be determined in accordance with the follow-
ing schedule:
Floor Area Of Place Of Business
In Thousand Square Feet Or
Fraction Thereof Component Fee
At Least But Less Than
$20.00
1 2 L$
2 3 $24.00
3 4 $26.00
4 s $28,00
7
6 $32.00
8 9 $36. -00
10 ZtL 0 . 00
is 20 $50.00
20 2S $60-00
30 40 $100.00
40 so $130.00
so 7S $160.00
75 100 $200,00
Over 200,000
Such profess ion soccupations, bu�'
.9 nesses ana/or
commercial establishments oprated within the corporate
limits of the Village of Mount Prospect and subject to
health and sanitation regulation's of the Village of
�Iount Prospect shall be assessed an additioTial component
I
fee based upon, class
i-Pica tion. as to the degree of
regulatioll tLs follows:
Classificatioll
component Le—P
2 (Based upon 2 health
'inspec-
t i offs annually)
$20.00
3, (Based upon, health
inspec-
tions annually)
$30.00
6 (Based upon 6'health
inspec-
tions, annually)
$60.00
Section 11.3105. Other License Fees.
As indicated elsewhere 'in thl's
i, s iNklun i c i p, a convenience
Ch,a,pter or, 1"I"I t, 11 C, 67U e T o the license fees
Cif
certain aro fessionsi otcvipatiofis,
businesses,, and/or commercial
establishmelitct are listed hetein below:
A
Auctioneers
$3S400 Per month; $5.00 per day, f6k
aily period less than one (1) morsth
13.
Bankers and Brokers
$35.00 annually
C.
I
Carnivals and Circuses
$50,00 per day, with a mini'mum fee
of $200,00
D.
CoiA-In-Slot'b6vietes
I. Cigarette Von'ding Machine
.00 per machine annually
2. Juke Boxeg
$10.00 per machine annually
3. Self-Service Dry Cleaning
S. 00, Per machine annually
4. Self-Service Laundeting
a. Washing Machines,
$ 5.00 per machine annually
b. Drying Machines
5�00 per machine annually
S. Food Vending Machilles
a. 1� to 10� can y$ gum,
I and nuts 1
$ 1.00 per machine annually
bi All other such Machines
$10.00 per machine annually
6., Machines vending other
general merchandise
$10.00 per machine annually
E.
Contractors
$2.00 annually
F
Detective Agencieg and
$30.00 annually, plus $5.00 applicd-
Pr ivate Detectives
tion fee
G
Dr ayme n�` nibulan'cOs C4bmenj
,q A
See Art'cle XI
and Taxi-cabs
H.
Food Dealers
See' Chapter 12
I*
1b,
Foreign Fire I n s u -'ran c e
2% of net annual receipts
Companies
. . . . . . . .
J� Liquor Dealers
K. Miniature Golf Courses and
Dri'ving RanIges
L Outdoor Advertisers
M. Seqo,nd-Hand Dealers and
Scavengers
Nq Tra;iIer Coach Parks
0, Vendors and Solicitors
P, We14hts' and Measures
See Chaptpr 15
$100.Qp annually
$150.00 an I nually
$50,00 annually or $5.00 per day
Reserved
Reserved
$5.00 annually see Article XXX
TO:
F R 0 M
SUBJECT:
DATE
M E M 0 R A N D U M
Mayor & Board of Trustees
Trustee E. F. Richardson, Chairman, Building Committee
Building Committee Meeting - May 10, 1972
May 11, 1972
Present: Chairman E. F. Richardson; Trustees Daniel Ahern &
George Anderson
Metro Sports Inc. & Randhurst C rD R e I
q2.est for a Var*ation for
a Free-Standinq Buildi.920.
Attorney John Cummins and other representatives of Metro Sports,
Inc., as well as Harold Carlson, representing Randhurst Corp.,
addressed the Committee and Mayor Teichert, who was also present,
regarding their request for a variation for a free-standing
building located at the southeast corner of the Randhurst
Shopping Center parking lot.
The contemplated use will include an enclosed sports complex
housing two ice rinks for use mainly by children and teenagers.
The arenas will be open and operating 50 weeks out of the year,
24 hours a day. The two ice rinks will approximate 85 ft. x 200 ft,
each in area and will be constructed so that they can (with the
permission of Randhurst) be utilized for a theatre in the round,
concerts, theatre and auditorium, basketball courts, etc. The
building itself will be sprinklerred throughout and will meet
all of the Mount Prospect building codes. Mr. Carlson indicated
that Randhurst has present parking facilities for 6900 plus
automobiles at one time. This represents approximately 6.2 cars
per 1000 ft. of leasable area, well above the national standard
of 5.5 cars per 1000 ft. of leasable area. He also pointed out
that existing parking spaces will be used interchangeably between
the existing shopping center buildings and the proposed sports
complex -- by reason of the types of use contemplated in the
Metro Sports facility.
The Building Committee recommends, by a vote of 3-0, that the
Board of Trustees and Mayor over -ride the 5-2 Board of Appeals
recommendation for denial, and that the Board of Trustees grant
the requested variation for a free-standing building. The
Village Attorney indicated at the meeting that the present
shoppi*ng center use within the existing B-3 zoning district
allows the sports complex use, but that the variation for a
free-standing building detached from the main shopping center
building would be necessary. Each of the members of the Committee
gave his reasons for his decision in support of the request.
The Attorney was then directed to prepare an ordinance for first
reading at the next regular meeting, May 16.
*0, 2 -
Building Committee Meeting - May 10, 1972
Commonwe'alth Edison Company., -t
Rst for a Use Variation foi
que
The Committee reviewed Case 72 -JOA wherein the Commonwealth
Edison Company, through its representative, Paul Parker, made
a request for a use var,ia,,cion f.or a distribution sub -station
With'in the R -A zoning d'I"Istir-I and within the right-of-way
north of Kens'ngton Road just west of the Soo Line tracks and
east Of Simonse,nfs Nursuries (near Wolf Road)
a, n n ex e d a r e a , 5V 1 n the newly
Upon review of 'the f"acts , the Bui 1 di ng Committee, by' a vote
of' 3-0 , reconimends that 'the
Board of Trustees concur wi th the
Board of Ap,peals, recoinmen,dati"ons under this case, and has
therefore direc,ted tIlte Atto'rney to draft a suitable ordinance
f'o r f i r s t re n g a t th e n,e x t, r e g u I a r me e t i ng
Swimming Pool Ordinance:
wlww�
WPI
After due consideration of the matter, the vote to recomm(end one
way or another was, * inconclusi've, insofar as one, member des,,ired
to retain the special use classificati,on for all resident al
pools, anothe,r member wished to efliminate th,e special use,
category of swimming, pools In �the RX an�d R-1 districts and
retain it in all, mul'tiple, family, districts'', an,id the Chairman
Of the Committee,(wil'th the Mayor) wil shed tha,t the Special use
concept, be removed from the ordiniance altogether so that
sw 1 Mm �i ng pools would be allowed as a matter of right in every
i d e nit a 1 d I s, tri if c t.
re,s 1
Once this matter is resol ved, the ordinance wi 11 be put in
f i nal form and presented at the June regular meeti ng for final
reading.
101% 1 pr I � 11.1 "'+
Building Committee Meeting - May 10, 1972
AdoDtion of the BCCA Basic Plumbinq Code:
Mr. Buell Dutton was present at the Committee meeting and
aided the Committee in its deliberations throughout the
e v e n i n g , In this last item on our agenda, he has recommended
that the present Mount Prospect Plumbing Code be replaced by
the BOCA Basic Plumbing Code along with certain changes in
order to adapt the BOCA Cdde to our ordinances and fee schedules
Trustee Anderson indicated that he was quite familiar with the
BOCA Plumbing Code and was in full agreement with Mr. Dutton.
The Committee recommends, by a vote of 3-0. that, at such time
as a suitable ordinance can be prepared by the Village Attorne
w ith the help of Mr. Dutton, the Board adopt the BOCA Basic
I
Plumbing Code as the Code to be followed 'in the Village of
Mount Prospect. I
Trustee E. F. Richardson
Chai rmaii
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE
MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
May 23, 1972
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Tei chert called the meeting to order at 8:15 P. M*
INVOCATION
Trustee Scholten gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Ahern Anderson Furst Scholten
Richardson Tei chert
RESOLUTION OF RESPECT
Trustee Furst, seconded by Trustee Scholten , moved for
passage of Resoluti
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That by this Resolution the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect express
to RICHARD H. MON ROE their deep grafi tude for hi s ded i cated
faithful, and constructive service as Village Trustee of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That a copy of this Resolution be spread upon
the minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect as a perpetual memento and that a certi fi e'd copy of
same be suitably engraved upon parchment and delivered to
RICHARD H. MONROE.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall be in full
force and effect from and after its passage and approval in
the manner provided by law.
Is
AYESS 6
NAYS 0
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 23rd day of May, 1972.
ROBERT D. TEICHERT
Mayor
ATTEST:
-D-ONALD W. GOODMAN I
'Y'age Clerk I
Upon roll call: Ayes Ahern Anderson Furst Scholten
Richardson Teichert
Motion carried.
Trustee Ahern, seconded by Trustee Furst, moved to approve
the aDpOintment of Patrick Link to fill the vacany-6rbated
by the resignation of Trustee Monroe.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Ahern Anderson Furst Scholten
Richardson Tei chert
p. 2 5/23/72
Trustee Patrick Link took the oath of office and assumed
his position on the Board.
Mrs. Pat Sramek requested an opportunity to be heard re-
garding the use of red bal I sti ckers to be pl aced i n the
wi ndows of homes where chi 1 dren are 1 i vi ng as a means of
notification to the Fi re Department i n the event of a
f i re - The matter was charged to the Fi re and Pot i ce
Committee.
The Village Manager submitted a written recommendation to
the Board regardi ng Wel 1 #16 requesti ng authori zati on for
short-term borrowi ng 1 n the amount of $250 000 , uti 11' zi ng
1 ocal 1 endl* ng 1 nsti tuti ons so that constructi on can corn-
mence immediately. It was further recommended that a con-
tract be entered 1 nto wi th J . P . Mi 11 er Artesi an Wel I Co, .
Trustee Anderson seconded by Trustee Rl' chardson moved
for passage of Resol uti on 13-72 4-1
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE BORROWING OF FUNDS
SUFFICIENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WELL #16
Ahern Anderson F u r s t L 1 n k
Upon roll call. Ayes.
Richardson Scholten
Motion carried,
Trustee Richardson , seconded by Trustee Schol ten. moved
to authori ze the Vi 11 age Manager to enter i nto an agreement
for constructi on of Wel 1 #16 wi th J P Mi 11 er Aresi an Wei I
Co.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Ahern Anderson Furst Li nk
Richardson Scholten
Motion carried,
At 9:15 P. M. Trustee Anderson left the meeting.
Trustee Richardson, seconded by Trustee Scholten , moved for
passage of Ordinance #2355:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 1800 W. CENTRAL ROAD IN MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
(Addressograph -cul ti graph )
Upon roll call: Ayes: Ahern Anderson Furst Ri chard on
Scholten
Pass Link
Motion carried.
p. 3 5/23/72
Trustee Richardson, seconded by Trustee Ahern, moved to
waive the rules to consider a matter not on the agenda
reg a rding a cqui s ti on of a ri ght-of -way.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Ahern Furst L i n k Richardson
Scholten
Motion carried.
The matter, discussed in Executive Session, pertained to
the acquisition of a 7 ri ght-of-way on Route 83 and 7'
ri ght-of -way on' Central at the Central School property.
Trustee Ahern, seconded by Trustee Furst. moved to author -
i ze the Vi I I age Manager to hi re and authori ze an MAI ap-
pral sal of the Central School property at Central and
Route 83.
Upon roll call,-, Ayes Ahern F u r s t Link Richardson
Scholten
Motion carried.
An opinion was received from the Village Attorney concern'
at ex 0 sti ng on property formerly resi denti al
1 ng vari 1 o n s 1
and now zoned for business. Trustee Ahern, seconded by
Trustee Furst , moved the village Attorney be authorl zed
to go before the Board of Appeals to request repeal of
the subject variations applied by specific ordinance
mentioned when the property was resi denti al .
I
Upon roll call: Ayes Ahern Furst Li nk Richardson
Scholten
I o t i o n c Nw-,�.
COMMITTEE MEETINGS
Finance Commi ttee - June 5th
ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Furst, seconded by Trustee Scholten , moved the
meeting be adjourned. Time: '9:35 P. M. Unanimous.
DONALD W. GOODMAN
Village Clerk
p. 4 5/23/72
MEMO RAN D 11M
TOO Honorable Mayor and Board of Trustees
FROM: Vl*llage Manager
RE: Comments of the Bureau of Fire Prevention and the
Architectural Commission regarding refractory - lined
chimneys.
DATE: July 21, 1972
Pursuant to your request to our Village Manager in my absence during
my vacation, I forward herewith for your information copies of the
memoranda received from both the Fire Chief, as Chief of the Bureau
of Fire Prevention, and Mr. Ray Schultz, Chairman of the Architectural
Commission ,
I believe the comments are self-explanatory and should aid the BoaT.d
of Trustees 'in determining Just what it wishes to do with regard to
possible amendments to our ordinances,
tl-� C
Robert J. Eppley
Village Manager
M E M 0 R A N D U M
Vi"lage Attorney
TO: J o' n J Zi nrcL er. mann,
FROM: Lawrence A. Pa_irit z , F -1-- e C hi, e f
DATE: july 10, 1972
SUEZECTR: PREFABRICATED CHIMNEYS
Tn answer to your memo of Jlu'lly,7, -1972 anregarding pre-
-scussed this
Dut- to -n d I 'nave di
.Labricated ch -- 0 i-Rineys; L, L_ 'n addition, ' '
J_ on several occasion -'S
s. I nave a iscussed
SU�D3 ec C
this with Lieu"Cenant M.IcKillop of the FJre Prevention Bureau,
to Bue"i DuIC-iton/ the Fire Department
As i have indicatiz% L
14
oduct *s in
J.'s in "agreement that the "ner-form&nc�e, 011�. a pr
��,^Ou -iE.
i , use
real.1-ty what we wi,sl, to aclL-Leve Ch4L, h t% of codes*
.L *, 11 1 Gabor C1 nroved type of
Tj,-1e use 0' the Underwriters a, �t,, o r,y Z"I, S letter
to Wen,gerrho-c'
1actory u it ur ' t ref erre 'b me provided the desired
-Co C3eorSe Anderson does no c i i s u,, . r,
I I 11
per-,f_:'ormance" is C-Xch'cved.
ove�
ourexperience witi
A- ,L A- j -
the past": years, i-Lid.-i-ca-tes that the occur enc e, of )"ire, hcats
at experienccd with masonZry chimneys/
of a hid rate tnan th ' I
es'Pecially considering -'Che par- centage 07r metal chimneys within
01 J_
the community is Overall a low f 19 Ute. e however, it is 'so
SJ_ _* c,aulty
n4'ic-nt that In almost all cases there has been L
k.,
instal lationt too close Proximity to combustibles, etc.,
rather than defective equipmaent.t'hat hasbeen the actual
'ire cause.
In, my opinion,,, the u,s,e of' �,ietal chimneys of tile type
oposc,d wo , uld present n,o , proID-leim provided adequate
4x
-struction to determi-ne
1,nspecti,ons can be m-ade 6urLng, con
ion,* as the workmanship involved
t'rie qualitN;, o,f Installat" I
ID a n t "Ini e
past pro' lems, rather th
seezzis to, be 1h,e source 0'
quip ment used.
*11
Lawrence A* Pairitz
I-4li-e CI-Iief
1 4.
121
I
M E M 0 R A N D U M
0
TOO Mayor and Board of Trustees
FROMO Trustee Donald Furst, Chairman, Judiciary Committee
SUBJECT: Judary Committee Meeting Report
DATE: July 14, 1972
Present.: Chairman Donald Furst and Trustees Daniel Ahern and Patrick Lin'A
'Case No. 72-8P Rezone from R-1 to R-4 PUD and R-2 to B-4 Property Located
at ,MFT*tiwest Corner FoTEUTT IZoad and ,iver
) - � ... __ . . . . ....... __ h
DiLeonardi was present to present for t e Board a review of the case he
had presented to the Plan Coi-iuriission on behalf of the petitioners in the
matter, The request in this case is to duplicate the original zoning
had for this parcel in the County before it was annexed to the Village.
The property is located on the Northeast corner of Kensington and River
Road. It is surrounded on the East by the Forest Preserve, on the North
by some single fam ly homes which back up to it, and on the West by the
McDonald Creek and our Fire' Station #3.
The County zoning allowed the construction of two separate five story
buildings with commercial on the first floor and 140 apartment its on
the next four floors of the first building, and all commercial floors
in the second building. In their efforts to reproduce this County zoning
the petitioners have broken the tract into an "L" shaped parcel surround-
ing a practically square parcel located immediately at the intersection
of Kensington and River Roads, with the former "L" shaped parcel fronting
the on both River and Kensington by located generally North and West of
the corner tract, The petition before the Judiciary Committee was for
either 140 units with commercial on the first floor of a five story
building located on the "L" shaped lot, with a second commercial building
located on the corner tract or in the alternative.,the request was to
erect the one building with no commercial but containing 172 apartment
dwelling units.
After a brief review of the utilities available and the necessary engi-
neering, the Committee entered upon the only real problem it has for this
development,: density, It was the consensus that the requested density
is a serious problem and hence, the members of the Judiciary Committee
made every effort to get that density down to what they felt is a reason-
able level. After long and hard discussion and negotiation the petitioners
and the Committee have agreed that a four story building containing 140
I
0",
Judiciary Committee Meeting Report
apartment dwelling units and no commercial would be more palatable for
the development of the 'ILI' shaped parcel, and that commercial develop-
ment in the nature of B-2 zoning should be allowed on parcel B. Itis
the recommendation of the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 2-1 that the
Mayor and Board of Trustees override the recommendation of the Plan
Commission and grant the requested zoning on the 'ILI' shaped parcel with
the condition that no commercial be allowed thereon and that the number
of apartment units be restricted to a maximum of 140. It is the further
recommendation by a vote of 2-1 that the Mayor and Board of Trustees
*th the recommendations of the Plan Commission regarding parcel
concur wi
B on the corner denying the requested B-4 zoning for that tract, and
that instead B-2 -Zoning be granted by the Mayor and Board of Trustees,
It is further understood that if the Board of Trustees concurs with
the recommendations of the Judlciary Committee contained herein, the
Attorneys will have to have some time in order to prepare the proper
planned unit development ordinance and that at such time as all is in
order, this matter will be brought back to the Village Board for final
action,
Case No, 72-9.D Rezone from R-1 to B-3 Property Located North Side of
L a rr! y e t z Ron ina
i V
C amP___,_M c''Dona n e a,"r
b half of Jewel Companies, Inc. and
"',, 7--dr—e -TEe"' omm
appeareci. '! ' L:� C ,ittee,
its la.nd owning affiliate, Jetco Properties, Inc. The property in
question fronts on Camp McDonald Road West of River Road. If you were
to start at the intersection of Camp McDonald Road and River Road and
walk westward along the North side of the Camp McDonald Road, you would
first approach a gas station on the corner; then you would come to an
architectural firm's office building', then the subject property- then
7 1
the f ifteen (15) foot wide tract containing easements, the fee title for this
tract being held by the owner of the property to the North which is the
subject matter of Case No. 72-10P, and finally, you would arrive at a
single family residence at the end of the block. The Jewel Company
has some problems with objectors in this matters. the members of the
arch i •
tectural f irm have objected because the proposed building would be
located immediately adjacent to the lot line dividing the two parcels --
their building being somewhat crowded and hidden because of the fact
that Olt was built on the rear of their property, pursuant to the County
ordinances, while our ordinance i�equires the building to be centered
more or less on the property in that a twenty (20) foot rear yard is
required. Other single family residential home owners objected for fear
that the easement located between their property and the subject property
would be utilized for vehicular traffic including trucks and garbage
trucks,
After reviewing color slides of the subject half acre parcel, which
slides were shown by the representatives of the architectural firm, the
Village Attorney informed the petitioners and the Committee that other
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and other ordinances of the Village
would have to be met before building permits could issue. These require-
ments include compliance with the front yard thirty (30) foot setback,
the rear yard twenty (20) foot setback, and the side yard ten (10) foot
setbacks on each side of the building; and the resubdivision of the
I
Judiciary Committee Meeting Report Page Three
property into one (1) to of record.
Having listened to all of the arguments, the Committee has no recommenda-
tion for the Mayor and Board of Trustees. One Trustee voted for the
proposed zoning change while two of us passed -- desiring to clarify in
our minds iust what would be happening to the easement separating the
petitioners tract from the existing single family homes on the West.
Case No. 72-10P Rezone' from R-4 to R-4 PUD Northwest Corner of Ca
- ----- ----- JIM,
ee
o T e i
mitt,wll vote oi t on
McDonald Road an''d 11 V b,
matter at, the Tirst, Board me eting in August, because Trustee Patrick
Link will not be present at our regular meeting July 18.
Wonald Furst
Chairman
iM E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: a Honorable Mayor & Board of Trustees
FROM: Village Manager
DATE. September 15, 1972
At a recent meeting of the Board of Trustees , Trustee George
Anderson asked the administration to study and report back to
the Board on how certain business alleys might be impro'ved, since
they are mostly in an unpaved and deplorable condition at the
present time. The alleys in question are located behind the
Northwest Highway businesses, north of the tracks, from School
Street southeasterly to the corporate limits at Mount Prospect Road.
There are 49 places of business in this area with 7 of them having
entrances from N-orthwest Highway to the alley - of these 7, 4 are
paved and 3 are not. We find that the alley is fenced off from the
private property to the north along its entire length with no
r idential garages along this length. It is used by the businesses
esi 1 1
mostly as a back entrance to stores, for garbage pickup, and the
1 0 &
parKing of truck service transportation. While all of i
places have access to it. only about one-third depend on this alley.
In discussing this with staff members, we all agree that the paving
should be concrete so that maintenance will not be necessary for
many years. This is not possible with bituminous paving which
requires considerable attention and is subject to damage by heavy
truck traffic. We also found that the Village has complete engineer-
ing plans and specifications for these alleys prepared by Consoer,
Townsend & Associates in 1963. These would need only a quick up-
dating job and adjustment of prices to be useable'.
We believe that to hold a private meeting with the owners to discuss
improvement of the alleys would be difficult and nonproductive with
the cheaper forms of improvement probably desired. Accordingly,
it is my recommendation that the Village Board charge the BOLI with
the holding of an informal public hearing sometime this fall after
the aforesaid plans have been brought up to date, At 'that time
the cost estimates could be given and,, a frank discussion held with
40
a final decision to proceed or abandon the project. Village Attorney
Zimmermann is also checking the legality of eliminating the residentia,
property owners from any assessment. If there has to be some indirect
benefit assigned to these properties, it would be my recommendatiort,--
that the Village participate and abate this cost. It wel I may be
that all of the business people in certain blocks may decide not to
use the alley and it might then be legally vacated in some manner.,
Page 2.
To Honorable Mayor & Board of Trustees
September 15,, 1972
Mr. Zimmermann's study will tell us if this is feasible. Pe'ndi ng
al I of thi s , I have as ked Publ i c Works Di rector Dave Creamer to
add stone to the alley in an attempt to maintain a passable
condi
Your action on this request will be appreciated,,
To: Board 'of Trustees
From: Plan Commission
Date: September.,6, 1972
Case # 72-15P
Date of Publ i cation July 28, 1972
Date of Publ i c Heari ng: August 18, 1972
This is a request to rezone from I-1 to B-3 lots 6. 109
and 12 1 ocated on property known as Ni 11 e' s,
It was properly moved and seconded - that the Plan Commission
recommend approval of the rezoning from I-1 to B-3,
Roll call vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Bennett Bradtke Grier Kloster Ross Young Busenhart
Absent: Caylor McBride
Nays: None
Motion declared carried.
J.C. BUS EMHART , SECRETARY
CC: Village Manager
All Plan Commissjon Members
Vi 11 age Attorney
Plan Commission File
Val
iw
M E M 0 R A N D U M
Is
TO* Robert J. Eppley, Village Manager
FROMID Richard L. Jesse, Budget Officer
SUBJECT: Revisions to Annual Budget FY 1972-73
DATE: August 31, 1972
The following increases have been necessitated by essential expenditures
and for commitments made thus far this year. This memorandum should be passed
upon by the Mayor and Board of Trustees. An explanation of these 'increases is
attached. Adequate funds are, or will be, available as indicated in the anticipated
year end balance of the 1972-73 Budget documente
1972-73 Budget
Revision
As Approved Effective thru
pa e Code De artment or Function 000"0"4-18-72 4-30-7.3
GENERAL FUND
30
050
al Department
240 'l
Other -Court Expenses, Experts
2,500
6vOOO
32
070
Buildin,Inspection Degartment
940
Off ice Equipment
300
364
33
080
Health Department
233
Vehicle Maintenance/Car Allowance
600
900
34
090
Public Buildin
387C
Repair Supplies -Station 2
600
1,200
41
201
'F i re, Dep ar, tme, n t
9 4 2
Card, 1"ac Ill M I on toning, Equipment
11,394
42
202
Fire Prevention Bureau
941
Printing Equipment"ll
2,000
2,081
43
301
Public Information and Relations
240
Bus Service 1
800
1v194
241
Senior Housing Mailing
1,000
53
390
Pr2Lct—s
974
Recycling Program
11600
975
Land Appraisals
Owl
550
62
Street
and Brill e. Fund
450
Street Equipment
954
Chipper Replacement
5t000
5,063
Code De artment or Function
550 Garbage_Collection Service
217 Collection by Contract
Richard L. .Tess2
Budget Of f icer
1972-73
Budget
Revision
As Approved
Effective thru
4-18-72
4-30-73 *W*Ww&wMNwWw*
�283,600
$ 500 , 000
I concur in the foregoing and respectfully recommend approval by the
Mayor and Village Board of Trus tees e
si—
Robert J Eppley
V1.11age Manager,
JW 40
Explanation of Revisions to Annual Budget FY 1972-73
Increase
30
050 De2artment
Expert witness for Court trials have exceeded estimates
32500
32
070 BuildinaIns, ection Dc2,artment
Recording devise costs higher than estimate
64
33
080 Health DeDartment
Car allowance was not increased to allowance provided for
300
all Village employees using their private car (such as
building inspectors)
34
090 Public BuildLaas.,
Funds not adequate due to final costs of installing
600
lavatory for basement and heatint maintenance.
41
201 Fire De2artment
Board approved on 6-6-72
112394
42
202 Fire Prevention Bureau
Printing equipment costs exceeded estimate
81
43
301 Public Information and Relations
240 Bus Service exceeded estimate
394
14
241 Approved by Board 5-16-72
1,000
53
390 Projects
974 Approved by Board 4-18-72
1,600
975 Appraisals required for possible acquisition
550
or condemnation of land
62Street
and Bridge Fund
954 Lowest bid exceeded estimate
63
Total - General Fund
for 1973-74 FY $ 19v546
63 550 Garba-e Collection Service
217 Necessary to provide adequate funds and does not $216,400
affect this years operations
TU: Mayor and Bioard of Trustees
�'RCJM: Trustee E. F . R i cha rd so n, Chairman Finance ommitt ee
Re; Finance Committee Meeting Yiono�a v August 21, 1972
Date: August 220 1972
In attendance.. Trustee Ahern, Village Manager Eppley and
Chairman E, F. Richardson., (rru,st+ee Furst away on vacation)
1. t3ucaro Application for Beer & Wine License
representedThe Romance Pizzeria located at 816 River Road, Mt. Prospect
was by owners
Mr. 6iagio Bucaro who had made a formal application for a
beerandWine license,
,:ParkingRequirementfacility..
n met.
Village MAnager Eppley reported a favorable inspection of
the Premises by Directoro Building and Zoning M► ""ll Dutton
and -a Health Inspection Report is forthcoming from
Mari ""
Rezoning of subject property from A -,l to 3-3 is pending.
Case #72-12P recommended 6-0 by the Plan Commission is
scheduled for a first reading of an Ordinance at the Regular
■w► ,, ! Meeting
The ]Finance Committee voted one in favor and one opposed to
the Beer and Wine License* Une Committee member wasabsent.
Owners will attend Regular aoard Meeting of September 19# 1972a
2. Moose Lodge #660 Request for a Private Club License
Mr. James Morris Jr. and Mr. W. Roy Martin represented the
Moose Lodge and requested Finance Committee approval of a
Club License for their new location at 225 E. Prospect Aveo
License would be the same as presently issued to the V.F.W.
Club restricted to Members and limited guestsf*
Trustee .. «.absentl however Trustees
Richardson bat'h, vo,lted,,,-",Ill""""",'ll",�f of creating one additional
Club license with the recommendation that it "" issued to
Moose Lodge 0660 pending favorable investigative reportso
+. !concurrence is requested*
is
F�stablishment of Corporate Revolving Fund for Lngineering
Investigation of M.F.T. Projects,
Village Engineero Leonard H. Dicke has asked the Village
Manager (letter of 8/16/72) to request the Finance Committee
to consider a $3000.00 Working Fund for payment of Engineering
I- -
Investigation of Projects. Repayment to the Fund
would be made from the authorized M.F.T. Project. -
The Finance Committee voted 2owO to recommend such a Resolution
to the Lloardo
Richardson
Chairman Finance Committee
6
ITi E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and Board of Trustees
FROM: Trustee George B. Anderson, Chairman, Building Committee
SUBJECT: Building Committee Meeting August 23, 1972
DATE: September 1, 1972
Presentleb Chairman Anderson; Trustee E. F. Richardson; Director of
Building & Zoning Buell B. Dutton
Governor Mr. Jim Morris of the Mount Prospect Chapter of the
Loyal Order of Moose, and Mr. Roy Martin-, addressed the Committee
regarding their request for a special use variation to operate
a Moose Lodge at the rear of 225 East Prospect Avenue.
The contemplated use will include a place for the members to
congregate, hold social events, serve dinner, and alcoholic
beverages. The club will operate on a private basis and will
not permlot non-members other than those accompanied by members.
The facility, including the food preparation area, will comply
with all applicable building codes with some minor improvements
to be made. These improvements will be made after submission
and approval of plans to the Building Department,
Upon review of the facts, the Building Committee, by a vote of
21--0, recommends that the Mayor and Board of Trustees concur
with the Board of Appeals recommendation under this Case No.
72-22A&
Responding -to a letter of request for additional ramps for
a
ingress and egress at Elmhurst Road and the Northwest Tollway,
written by Mayor Behrel of Des Plaines and dated November 5,
1971, the Committee discussed the advantages and disadvantages
for an entrance at this location. Comments made were as followsl
Ad'van'taaes:
1 The quicker, less congested location for those residents
of our Village wishing to enter or leave the tollway, heading
to or coming from the northwest, thus eliminating the need
to go through Arlington Heights to enter or leave the tollway
at out. 53,
2. The addition of ramps would be an inducement to the develop-
ment of the industrial areas in the southern portion of our
community.
M
IN
Page 2
Building Committee Meeting - August 23, 1972
3. The additional ramps would decrease the Des Plaines traffic
through Mount Prospect.
10, Some additional traffic may be generated from the north
(Prospect Heights and Wheeling). However, the Committee
felt that Route 53 would be the most likely route going
to or coming from the northwest.
In conclusion, the Committee recommends, by a vote of 2-0, that
the Mayor and Board of Trustees go on record with a resolution
to
to the Illinol's State Toll Highway Authority 'indicating the
Boa-T.-dls posture regarding the inatter and the urgency for
additional ramps at Elmhurst Road and the Northwest Tollway,
S w *1 mrr. 9.0 .1s
As has been done on previous occasions, the Committee again
'dered whether sw'mming pools should be a special use 'in
consi I
all residential zoning districts, or 'in some districts, or in
none of the districts,
Prior to this meeting, our Director of Building & Zoning was
informed of previous dialog regarding this matter. He was also
given previously drafted ordinances to review and study. In
discussing the nuts and bolts parts of the ordinance, Mr. Dutton
made several recommendations which the Committee felt were
important and that should be contained in the new ordinance.
Once the Committee resolves the special use question and the
�uilding Director reflects his recommendations in the proposed
ordinance, the Committee will present a final form ordinance
and recommendation to the Board.
As a personal concern for the driveability of publi c alleys
serving the commercial businesses along Northwest Highway, we
entered 'into a discussion,, The Committee considered that public
alleys should be of such condition that the motoring public can
use them without fear of damaging the automobile or causing a
dust storm in the neighborhood.
The Committee recommends, by a vote of 2-0, that the Village
Manager 'investigate and report back to this Board a means of
accomplishing these 'improvements, whether 'it be in the form of
a special assessment of private undertaking handled by the
administration.
George B, Anderson
Chairman
I"
A�
L�l a h 21WA
August 25, 197-Q
Village of Mount Prospect
Department of Law
7-1
.!---2 E. Norhtwest Highway
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056
Zimmermanel
Village Attorneyl
CHICAGO AREA OFFICE
1901 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
MT. PROSPECT, ILL. 60058
TEL. 439-2620
Enclosed you will find the document signed by our upper
management in conjunction w - I - th the ut y easementi
rit,-*�its f or Jinstalling a twenty inch water main thru our
ne,-!.- o p e r t y e
During the time of our last meeting including the village
manager Mr. Robert Eppley., I beleive we discussed the in -
of this main p] -us 4Q-nru our parking lot., also the
T" connection near our building and last was the restore -
of the parking lot affter the installat'on has been
completed in two to three days.
I would like to be notified before the installation starts
to be sure we make propeEir arrangement for all truck traffic
W IT 4-h my people to see if we can maintain the same flow
during this construction periodo.
I will also ask that if at all possible to obtain two copies
of t_�ie original print enclosed for our files here in Mt.
Prospect and our home office.
Please contact m.e if you have any futher questions pertain-
ing to this particular matter.
Si,qcerel
y,
.. .... . .. . . ... ...
G, We Be.r,y
Chicago Factory Branch Manager
ri
Im
ME
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION STUDY MEETING
AUGUST 15, 1972
1, CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE STUDY MEETING OF AUGUST 29 1972
4. SUBDIVISIONS
a. L.E. Si ngl ey Resubdivision - Alder Lame
b. Krasnowski's Resubdivision - Prospect Ave.
5. ZONING
a. 72-13P J, La'urence K1 ei nfel d
Pre -annex and rezone to R-4
3044 S. Busse Rd.
5. ADJOURNMENT
ad
M3
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
STUDY MEETING
AUGUST 2. 1972
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Young called the meeting to order at 8:15 P. M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon rol I cal 1
Bennett Bradtke Caylor Kloster Grier doss Young Busenhart
Absent: McBride
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF STUDY MEETING OF AUGUST 2, 1972.
Mr. Ross, seconded by Mr. Bradtke, moved to approve the
minutes of August 2. 1972 as submitted.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Bennett Bradtke Caylor Kloster
Grier Ross Young Bus enhart
Motion carried.
SUBDI VIS IONS
FRANK'S RESUBDIVISION 107-109 W. Prospect Ave.
Mr. Ross, seconded by Mr. Bennett, moved to approve Frank's
Resubdivision plat and authorize the Cnairman and Secretary
to sign the final plat.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Bennett Bradtke Caylor !C1 o s t e r
Grier Ross Young Bus enhart
Motion carried,
ZONING
CASE 72-13P J. Laurence HCl einfeld - Pre -annex and rezone to R-4
3044 S. Busse Rd.
The petitioner was not present therefore this case will be
carried over to the next study meed ng,,
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was unanimously adjourned at 8:50 PAN,
M E M 0 R A N U M
TO: Mayor & Board of Trustees
FROM: Trustee George Anderson, Chairman, Building Committee
SUBJECT: Building Committee Meeting 10/25/72
DATE: November 2, 1972
Present: Chairman Anderson; Trustees Richardson and Furst;
1;•19
Director of Building & Zoning Buell Dutton.
I
#h
At the request of the residents affected by the building
lation, a continuance was granted until November 29, 1972.
Fence Ordinance Change:
At the request of the Building Committee, the Director of
Building & Zoning has prepared a report documenting our
present fence ordinance with recommended changes to make the
ordinance: (1) easier for all to interpret; (2) elimination
of the inconvenience in appearing before the Board of Appeals
when a fence height exceeding 4211 is requested; and (3) to
eliminate the double fence when a pool is desired in the
rear yard.
Upon review of the facts, the Building Committee, by a vote
of 3-0, recommends that the Mayor and Board of Trustees
concur with these recommendations and requests the Village
Attorney to draft such an ordinance based on Mr. Dutton's
report,.
Studies continue . 0 . final report to be recommended out
at the next Committee meeting.
Location & Screen Garb 1 nd Rec acles :
I lipill Nim"o
lke, Conta`ners a
Studies cont lenue . ID . viewpoints on san litat 'ion w '111 be
cussed at our next meeting with Mrs. Marjorie Boswell, Director
of Health Services .
George B., Anderson
Chairm-an
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Mayor & Board of Trustees
FROM: Trustee Kenneth Scholten, Chairman, Fire & Police
Committee
SUBJECT:Fire & Police Committee Meeting ll/l/72
DATE: November 3. 1972
On November 1, 1972, at the regular meeting of the Fire &
Police Committee, only 0. T. Gustus and Art Coy of the Safety
Commission and myself were present.
We discussed the sight distance and stop and yield sign
warrants ordinances, and have submitted rough drafts of these
and the ordinances previously drafted by the Village Attorney.
Since I am sure that each of you have certain comments to
make regarding these ordinances, and no one was at the meeting,
I am afraid that this discussion must take place at the Board
level rather than at a Committee meeting where it belongs.
If previous to the meeting you have any comments concerning
these ordinances, I would be more than happy to discuss them
over the 'phone.
Kenneth V., Scholten
Chairman