HomeMy WebLinkAbout2331_001Clerk's office
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLT
A G E N D A
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Board Room, 2nd Floor Tuesday, January 24, 1984
112 East Northwest Highway 7:30 p.m.
I. CALL To ORDER - ROLL CALL
I I . ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 10, 1984
III. CITIZENS To BE HEARD
IV. DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT
In November.,of 1983, the Committee of the Whole began
discussions in earnest regarding the feasibility , of
development. and redevelopment within. the coo; � .�, n -ity
with pr ry focus on the Central Business Distract.
Discussions at that time were continued with the
,,_direction that the Board would reconsider the matter
and attempt to formulate a response to those initial
meetings.
Attache.d ' is a memo. from -Mayor ,Krause outlining some
of the issues with redevelopment and offering an outline
.for action to be considered by the Board of Trustees.
Staff members from the Department of Community Develop-
ment will be in attendance at the meeting.
V. RAILROAD BEAUTIFICATION PLANT
For a number ofyears., the Village has employed, a num er
of programs to improve public and/or common, properties
aesthetically. The Railroad,right-of-way h: s recei
ived
some attention n the past and as a major focal point and.
thoroughfare in the co unite, "it wlill. continue to
demand our attention. - The Public Works staff, Tith. the
am �f a landscape architect, has developed a phased
prgam .fo.r continued aesthetic improvements along the
Railroad right oT way .
Such improvement.s.. not . only benefit the overall image
of the "c ,>> unity but are also beneficial to adjoining
private properties abutting the Railroad. right-of-way.
While funding for 'this program is contained in next
year's budget, the Manager's .office feels it is important
for the Board to review our concept plan at this early
date so that changes can be made as deemed appropriate
by the Board.
VT. 1984-1985 MFT PROGRAM
As with most municipal expenditures, the perceived need
by various interests exceeds available factual resources.
The 1984-1985 budget recommends a series of programs
and projects. The predominant MFT expenditures are
found on page 147 of the proposed budget. Additional
expenditures are contained in Traffic Engineering,
Street Lighting and various smaller programs governing
Street Maintenance.
-r.—. .. ,.... .n.....r n ..... .,, n ., ,m ny m ., ry nY 8 nDWury �w,tlrtw ,ry
..'n
C �, 1, ym rI%✓1J', , ll JYJ yil ,> �r E , � �+
wrlrr r `uwu«u
t
a �ww
k
The staff has put together a presentation giving an
overview of NFT revenues, proposed projects and
pezidin.g projects. This year's budget re-emphasizes
our goal to maintain our local roadway system at
a.ccu.s tom d ' levels . The re- emph.as is of a Pavi
.,.............. ..... ,
VI. WF " 16 REPAIRS,
Mr. Burghard referred
Director ,
1984
regarding repairs to Well #16. The Board had previously
authorized a figure of $63,000 for repairs to`' -,
�J.
in October of 1983., -Mr. Weeks' memo reviewed 1
the factors which have,increased: 3..rs oy $14,352
to a total of . Mr. Burghard requestedBoard
authorization,to appropriate an additional,
these repairs.
Mr. Weeks was s,e.,'ked whet;,er or-not this 'Rell would remain
on line afte-J.- Lake Michi'g'anw'ater pipeline was
completed. . He indicated that this would be used as one
of .the,,. prim .ry stn , - y Wells for approximately seven
would
vater system,
'
atilt icipated"' t�hA:t any ol' t''he eXistir�g;, Well s " ou, 1, d, b
.
Aft
�� � �� 1 discussion, n, the lens e f the Mayor and
oard was ,that there-was no, e p n ha�;mR hese
necessary repairs and authorized the additional expendst r s.
This item will be placed on a subsequent Village Board
Agenda; :for official approval.
1I. MANAGER' REL..:�1�2
provided a general update on the progress1. .
WATER Burghof LAKE MICHIGAN
that bids have been opened and are being reviewed
station at O'Hare Airport and,that A
the mailn',�rum
contractv I 6,01d. ' b,",e awarded sometime later this month after
approval by the Executive Committee.
. �� : rghar indicated that the break up f the BT
� n System 'a AT& will have a sig ifs a � � impact
� � e p � /tel ph n sts . Ing a tion.., t pr y
increases in rates, AT&T s apparently not willing to
AGREEMENTShonor indefin,31Ltely FRANCHISE th municipalities.
Currently, n approximately ,
for e. 1 of Mom.nt, Pros t~ ,,,. ich is received•
form f discounted telephone
tj: par r o
ato,-mQd3*.fy Franchis
the Telep-
r;�i as i t h y ; : the 'tl
ryear and _ 1,,cussed r"
a ".,n" ,
-3_
J
V"Ilage o Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
RE: DOWNTOI-M DEVELOPMENT
DATE: JANUARY 20, 1984
At our January 24 Committee of the Whole meeting, we
will discuss the various opportunities currently available
to our Village to take additional substantive steps leading
to development in our downtown.
I. PAST PROJECTS
The following six programs have placed the Village in a
position in 1984 which can now generate positive change and
strengthen the downtown area. These programs expressed the
Village Board's policy decisions, with regard to the downtown,
Our policy has worked to provide in,ore adequate and convenient
parking facilities, to improve the overall i'nage and appearance
of the area, and to stimulate the private sector to Invest
in the downtown.
1. BUSSE-'MLLE. The revitalization of these two
cocks three years; the dedication in 1982
marked a significant achievement and a feeling
among government and private business that our
downtown can be improved with mutual cooperation.
This development has been a major impetus leading
to interest in the area for future improvement.
'PARKING CHANGES. The downtown has long struggled
with the needs — for commuter -parking as well as
shopper parking. The purchase of the Maple Street
commuter lot •opened up the needed •additional
commuter parking. •With the new legislation that
has revamped the RTA and the creation of a RTA
suburban bus board, Mount Prospect will continue
to work for improvement in commuter transportation.
Parking for shoppers has been improved by Providing
expanded space at the f ormer V & G lot; b iiour
parking i s now available on the periphery of the
downtown area., and the Village Board has adopted
•. "i requiring donation of funds from
private developers when variations are granted
for parking spaces in our downtown.
3. PROSPECT AVENUE C&NW PLATFORM. 1984 will see
the 'improvements on the Prospect Avenue block
from Main to Emerson as well as the southeast
corner of Prospect, 'improvements to the Emerson
Street crossing and improved traffic flow on the
Main to Emerson Street block.
4. FACADE IMPROVEMENT AND LOW-COST COMMERCIAL
LOAN PROGRAMS. ese programs were insElf—tuted
to make available funds to landlords or tenants
for improvements to their buildings as well
as rear -store improvements.
5. SIGN 0 ' RDINANCE. The extensive revisions adopted
in 1980 will gradually show in the improved
signs that will, in turn, improve the quality
of our downtown.
6. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS . Both Busse and Emerson
streets si1e__w`a1F_ Improvements were completed in
1983; also, we are beginning improvements on
Northwest Highway, such as the streets between
South Albert and South George.
These various programs have created an environment
conducive to private investors being interested in our
downtown and at the same time reflect the philosophy of the
citizens of our comunity. The surveys that we had taken in
1979 and 1980 showed that ,citizens support effort's to improve
the area. Attached is a copy of the 1980 survey which
indicates the philosophy of a community relative to its
downtown as well as its importance. In the 1979 survey, 38%
supported moderate to major increases in expenditure to
improve conditions of the Central Business area. Mount
Prospect citizens, I believe, while supporting change lead-
ing to a strengthening of that area want their downtown to
contain low to moderate structures only; boundaries remain
where they currently are, improved appearances and to serve
multi-pilrpos'e activities. The citizens do not support any
massive changes, if indeed this -small area could bear any
massive changes; they do support improvements for office,
service and quality multi -family. Clearly, we can blend the
interests of our residents, interests of the private sector
and succeed...., showing our downtown as a center of community
life.
M
vir
l t,uw '71'
u�
5
"z
..... .... . . . . miii i,, � 31,", 7 Ir _33&'� AL
VILLAGE PLANS AND STUDIES
The Comprehensive Plan states:
"It "is critical that any new housing around downtown
be carefully monitored and controlled to ensure the
highest possible quality of development. Develop
ment should be low-rise in keeping with adjacent
i
neighborhoods, with quality materials and construction
and extensively landscaped and buffered siftes."
The downtown area is approximately 90 acres in total
land area; however, much of this acreage is devoted to
transportation -related facilitideos, streets, railroa
gd right
of ways 0 and yo
The owntwn area, as far as land
usage, is small compared to other villages' downtowns and
presents a different challenge. Based on the steps we hav•
taken and the input we have received from many sources, th
Board is in a key position to implement new developments a
this time.
1111 ORION 11 ;
I will discuss specific areas of possible development
and after the specific areas_, discuss possible, financing of
the projects. I wish to emphasize that each dis,tr,ict is I
believe) generally homogeneous in ter is of in tensity, scale,
character and in relationship to pedestrian and vehicular
movements. Each can stand on its own and go forth on its
own.
The following areas could be supported for redevelopment:
SIM
cul
1. EMERSON STREET--BUSSE TO CENTRAL, EAST SIDE.,
7TTI—s-'area currently consists of,five sing n". gl e family
homes as well as five lots for Mount Prospect
State Bank employee parking. New office development
is an appropriate use. Discussion should be held
with Mount Prospect State Bank which owns the
middle lots used for employee parking. This
proposal would not involve the single family homes
which are on the west side of Maple Street and
back up to the homes on Emerson.
2. BUSSE FLORIST PROPERTY. This prime area consists
of three plus acres of vacant land which would
support multi-family/office space. Discussion
should include current owners' plans and possible
inclusion in redevelopment.
3. PROSPECT AVENUE --FROM EMERSON TO MAPLE. This area
includes current Mrs. P & Me restaurant., single-
family home, Ibbotson Heating and car -wash business.
This block should be upgraded using both current
uses and new uses.
4. WILLE STREET --FROM BUSSE TO CENTRAL.
This area consists ol ive sing e- amily homes;
two lots for auto storage and one lot to serve
storage and deliveries to North West Electric and
doctor's office. This area provides potential
office/commercial.
5. SCATTERED LOTS--BUSSE AVENUE. The four lots on
Busse Avenue"fr6E-2-0—west Busse to corner of
Busse/Willeare potential sites for redevelopment
for commercial.
The benefits of proceeding with any or all of these
proposals would provide upgrading of underdeveloped lands,
.L
razing properties that are not as well maintained as others,
f- r. 0 1
and removing inappropriate single-family uses in an office/
multi-family/commercial area.
I have attached a map and marked the five areas of
potential development.
I wish to add that several of these homes mentioned in
the five listed projects above are occupied by the owners,
not by No property would be condemned if an owner
were noiYc_: willing to sell, unless a life estate were granted
to the Owner.
-4-
. .... . .... .. . . . ..... . . 1?11,1.11r�11�117,
7
SAM, .11H
E IN
I'V-7-' FINANCING OF THE PROJECTS CAN INCLUDE
VARIOUS TOOLS.
A. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING. We can declare any of
E-he—se-ve�d�is
--f-i�-tric�ts or tax increment financing.
I do not support creating the entire downtown for
tax increment financing. Both Special Service
Districts #3 and #4 for Busse -Wille development
and the Prospect Avenue project are covered with
separate financing assessments; I believe we could
gain greater support by implementing tax increment
financing only for the 'areas that we key -in for
redevelopment.Tax increment financing would
strongly aid those areas. We must first declare an
area as a redevelopment area. Taxes within the
district are frozen at a base year level. TIF
Bonds would be sold to finance clearance, relocation
and project improvements. As redevelopment occurs,
creating a higher tax value than the base year,
the differential tax proceeds are used to pay the
costs of principal and interest on original bonds.
Other taxing districts continue to receive their
yearly tax payments at the pre -TIF rate.
B. SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICTS. This procedure is one
we are most fami'l .... i_a_rwi_t_h; used for several water
system purchases as well as Busse -Wille development.
Fifty percent of the owners and voters_can petition
against the creation of the district.i,
C. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS., The
V'i7_1�age�Boa"rc[_E`an set -zi-s-i-d-e--a-dUi—Ci-o-n-a--17fi.inds in
the upcoming budget. Funds can be used to
purchase under -developed or blighted land and
then sold to a developer at lower cost.
D. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS.
E. REVENUE SHARING FUNDS.
F. VILLAGE CAN ALSO ASSIST WITH LAND ACQUISITION
THROUGH NEGOTIAri,ION, LEASES AND CONDENAT_T_O`N.
These financing tools can actively pursue the market
opportunity now available --can assist developers with land
and organii-zatil-on, and/or assembly; displays ' a strong public
sector c,o,mmitment as a stimul-us for private investment; and
creates an improved environment for new development.
Our staff provides the professionalism to assist the
Board in achieving any of the projects to which we commit.
The Village Manager's office can play an important role in
negotiating the purchase of properties.
Volunteers can assist the Village Board once the Board
establishes both a policy of whether to proceed with a
particular project, as well as a commitment as to financing
procedures.
-5-
There is one other matter on which I should comment and
that is Mr. Grobman"s interest in purchasing the Village's
Public 'Works building. As everyone is aware, I favor the
retention of the Village's current Public Works building.
The following are some of my reasons supporting my
philosophy:
1. Current building is 20 years old and I do not
believe that a building of that age must be replaced
at an expenditure of five -six million dollars.
2. If any additional space is needed., I would support
the removal of the salt stored inside and expand only.
The Manager's - report of September, 1981 states expansion
will leave the Village short 3,000 square feet. We
should be able to easily make an adjustment of 3,000
square feet without much difficulty.
3. The use of a building for storage of vehicles
the downtown does not disturb me. The building 11S
not centered in the downtown area and other uses, such
as game rooms, karate'stores and auto body shops are
more offensive to me than indoor storage of vehicles.
A I , :)revious board located this garage in its current
location.
4. Since I am not bothered by outside storage of
several vehicles, I do not support an expenditure
necessary to enclose all vehicles. The Armed Forces
stores vehicles outside as do many governments.
5. The current building, if sold, would generate
$4,200.00 in real estate taxes to the Village per
year. Depending on its usage, sales tax could also
produce revenue for the Village, but the additional
revenues are not of any significance.
6. Any benefits derived from the sale of the building
can,,not offset the huge cost to the citizens for gaining
a larger building for storage of vehicles. I do
appreciate, however, that several Trustees support a
new Public Works building.
I look forward to discussion o '. f all of these issues
raised in this memo with the Board of Trustees.
CAR OLYN H. KRAUSE
CHK/rcw
attachments
c: Vill-age Manager Terrance L. Burghard
DirE:,ctor of Community Development Kenneth Fritz
-6-
. . . .......
. ..... ....
TIr
7 IT T
pllf� ]11/1/7�
....... . ..... 7"
. ... ......
777
11,7""77, , M
M
j
R J Ll
S1 M.,
CITIZENS SU!Tk,/-EY' Rees'pon8e-s- Related to -DCWf1b:)wn 1-TrprovOte-nt8 and Revitalization
A survey was sent to all of the households in Mt. Prospect, and 2703
responses were received. Many of the questions concerned downtown
needs., and problems. Some- of -these responses, and some generalizations from the
respoiqses.. are outlined below.
C & IN11 STATION. Many respondents (nearly 65%) feel that it is
important to fix up,,. the C & NW Station and pr'ova_ ide mere ca-irmter parking; only
21.5% said this i's not irportant. Relocating the C & NW station, haver, drew a
very mixed. responsgla, -- about 41% said it should be relocated, 34.5% said it
sil-iould not, and 24.2% had no opinion.
1viost, respondents (over 50.%) feel that the Village needs .a. STRCNG
FW -A -T -j PO-UqT downtcw-n- only 21.9% sAld it was not needed.
.0
3. Mst respondents (nearly 59%) felt that there are areas of tam
Vnich need to be REDEVELOPED.-. only 7.8% disagreed. Nearly all the respondents
(over 95%->) think it is in -portant to encourage property owners to fix up
dl: .-apidated buildings,
4., LANDsmpiNG. Most respondents (56%) believe the Village should
d sarre rroney to landscape public areas; 22.9% disagreed.
5. BUSINESS SIGNS. Most respondents (over 61%) favor stronger control
of busin-----3ss signs; only 6.7% disagreed'.
6. T-Sost -respondents (ahTost 83%) favor encouraging -w. =TproveArrn
t in the
Appecarance of Cowuriercial Corridors.
7. PJM=1N'r-7* TBE PUBLIC WORKS FACILTIY Outside the downtown area drew
a very mixed response -30.4% said it should be relocated, 27.7% said it should
not, and 41.9% had no opinion.
'Eq
A
1. Most respondents (over 51%) favor an I,NCPYASE IN DOWNTOM RETAIL
BUSINESSES -- 18.996disagreed.
2. Downtmm IS used by the people who live here. Nearly 60% of the
respondents oon-e downtown at least once a week., and over 28% cm -e downtown 3 or
more t ms per week; over 82% cc: m downtown at least once per nonth. People DO
Use downtown Mt. Prospect for RETAIL SERVICES -- almost 42% said they come
dox%ntcwn for this. 'They also ome downtown for Personal Services (over 46%),
Re-staurants (21.5%), and commuting (22.5%). The respondents said that they would
DWDUOWN MORE OFTEN for special sales (over 39% cited this) , for Fairs (over
18%), for Farmers Markets (nearly 32%),, and for Art/Flower shows (over 16%).
PROBIZAS IN DOWNTCM: Men asked what the greatest problem in downtown
Mt. Prosp,-=,ct is,,, the, alrLswers mst often cited were a LACK OF; VAR= IN' CWDS &
SEWICES (41% nentioned this) PARKING (over 39% cited this) , anaTPAFFIC OONCESTION
(nearly 29% cited this).
1. People who responded to the survey seem to see a need for mare
convenience retail services downtarm, and for more special sales and similar
activities. Many of them currently do at least same shopping downtown but not
to a great extent. Most of their shopping is done at other shopping centers in
Mt. Prospector at large nalls.
2. Respondents see a need for a better variety in goods & services downtown,
batter parking (although they do think that access to downtown is good), more
retaJi-1 b-us=lesses, and rrore special sales and activities. They believe that there
is no need for mre private office s ,
3. Respondents seem to favor nd<-h-ig more of their downtown — they see
a need for a focal point., for a community & cultural actives centerl for sarae
redevelopap–qt, for landscaping, for fixing iq:) dilapidated buildings. They seem to
dOWntCF�M*
sce aheed for both P
uli and, privcLte axrproverrenbS
4. Respondents seem to favor tighter controls on industry & office
location and on business sign regulation.
7f]j
1`311,,,1001214
.... ........ f",
f
. . . ..� . .
d $ .
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: January 18, 1984
SUBJECT: Committee of the Whole Discussion
Railroad Right -of -Way Beautification
For several months the Public Works Department has been consulting
with our landscape architect, Bernard Rosauer, for the develop-
ment of a master landscape plan for the Northwestern Railroad
right-of-way. This plan has now been completed and we request
the opportunity to make a presentation for your approval and
subsequent comments.
The purpose of this master plan is to act as a guide for
implementation of all landscaping in a phased program within
the guidelines of our financial resources. The landscaping
architect will be present at the meeting as well as our
Superintendent of Forestry to explain the proposed plan.
I tiin PF
M.,
Ali
err b !
Director Public Works
MM
Village ofM,, ountProspect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TW:"'�14117' Al
15",
� ;411"A
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: January 18, 1984
SUBJECT: Motor Fuel Tax Funds Over View
So that our Village Board can have input into the planning
process for the expenditure of Motor Fuel Tax Funds, I
request that the opportunity be given to make a presentation
at a Committee of the Whole meeting. At this meeting our
intent would be through means of graphic posters, etc., to
show the officials the overall picture of our MFT Program.
Some of the topics which will be presented include:
Requests for traffic signalization at various
intersections.
FAUS road improvements including reconstruction.
Request for road improvements.
Railroad crossing improvements.
Review of street lighting requirements by the State.
Review of street resurfacing programs through the
past several years.
Roadway widening and reconstruction projects under
consideration.
Review of streets and roadways where right-of-way
acquisition is necessary.
--- Review of MFT revenues and projections.
The engineering staff will be present to aid in the discussion
of the total program.
re ee s
Director Public Works
EM
Village of cunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZr COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
41
SUBJECT: REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM
DATE.- JANUARY 20, 1984
The Village's Residential Rehabilitation Loan Program is
currently experiencing a surge in activity with sixteen projects
recently approved or in progress (see attached summary). To
date-, over $220,000 in Community Development Block Grant_fundshas been invested in the Village's housing stock through this
program, and we anticipate an additional $90,000 in home improve-
ments by the end of this fiscal year,
The Mount Prospect Residential Rehabilitation Loan Program
provides a deferred payment, no interest loan to income eligible
households. In all, 35 Mount Prospect families have participated
in the program since it began in 1981. Nearly half of these
families are female headed households.
Although the program allows a maximum loan of $15,000, the
average loan per household has been about $8,600. Typically,
these funds are used for plumbing or electrical repairs, heating
and ventilation improvements, roof replacement, energy conser-
vation improvements, window and door repairs or replacement,
exterior siding and gutter replacement., and other code -related
improvements, I
Overall, we feel that the program has been quite successful, both
in terms of dollars expended and the number of households
assisted. Through this program, the Village has met its housing
assistance goals for the first year of our three-year Housing
Assistance Plan, and we should exceed our goal of 15 units
assisted during the second incremental year,
KHF: hg
PAGE NO. ()0001
0 1 / 19/83
SUMMARY
OF REHABILITATION F'ROJECTS
HOUSEHOLD
DESCRIPTION
SIZE
INCOME
s-rAi,us
COMPLETION DATE
CONTRACT
Female
Head of
Household
02
11242
(-'I'omp I e t e d
10/05/82
485 3. ()0
Female
Head of
Household
0 1
ic
I lX
In progi-esss
1E.}7 00'. 2 0
Fermi I y
ERI2
17142
In progress
5819.49
Elderly
COUple
02
58'_=i2
Comp I et ed
09/15/82
9641.00
Fatil i I y
04
2 C-) 3 F9 '42
In progress
1266.0o
Fema I e
Head of
Hous-ehol d
(.-)3
6575
Completed
0 93 3/16/
14537. 00
L
Female
Head of
Househol d
(--)6
1287*7
(""o m p I et ed
06/07/82
9525. C)(-')
Female
head of
hQUsehc)l d
06
18053
Approved
0. 00
Female
Head of
Household
05
1945*7
Completed
01/21/83
11966. 00
F ami I y
-)4
C
-5067
23
Approved
C). C)o
Female
Head of
1-10LIsehol d
0 4
18( 4
Comp 1 eted
12/31/81
2522.00
Fema I e
Head of
Househol d
01.
62('-)2
In progress
2565.00
1= m. I y
18180
(-'.'ofnp I eted
12/08/81
4634.25
Family
0 4
1 B7 9-4
Comp 1el. ed
C-) 4 13 8
10227.90
Fa mi I y
-2
0
17()5(-.)
Comp I eted
I 1 1 8:31
1498:3. C.) 0
Fami I y
04
9495
Comp I e. -t ed
02/25/83
12160. 00
Large
Fami I y
06
18 6:3
Appl-oved
0. 00
Female
Head of
Household
02
18",146
Approved
0.00
Large
Fami I y
05
19268
(-.f'omp I eted
11/01/82
8850. 00
Female
head of
household
01
752()
In progress
7115.oO
Large
Fami I y
05
2
189"A::6
Applica on
0. 00
Femal e
Head a+
Housel -i c)I d
3624
Camp I e -ted
06/27/83
7286.(-0
"A
Female
Head of
Household
c) 1
12231
In progress
3569.
Fami 1 y
iA
2731,9
Approved
').00
Fami I y
04
; r
61 1:'.:f
Cam p I eted
0 6) 0 1 /8"',
3*76F.I. 51
I ......
Fami I y
04
9952
Comp I e ted
11/17/83
9882.58
Lar -ge
Fami I y
05
5 1 63N
Approved
00
Female
Head a+
Household
04
14321
Comp 1 et ed
10/29/82
12674. (*.')0
kb -A
Female
Head of
IAOUsehol d
4260
("J'omp I eted
04 I /82
14992.50
Femle
a
Head o -F
Household
03
14757
Comp 1 eted
10/29/82
7953. 00
�'
Family
02
16604
Completed
09/12/83
15245. 00
Family
04
16500
Comp 1 eted
12/03/82
*777`x. 2
Female
Head of
Household
1621 C )
Approved
0 00
Femal e
Head a+
Household
03
11600
Approved
00
PEFF
Family
04
13480
In progress
9245.00