HomeMy WebLinkAbout2330_001IP
OP
40
40
MP
Ah W
4P
.. . . ....ex.. ...
ect resident.,
,.rendum question.
is not the most
at there were
on gasoll'ne which
Mr. lowe used
ed
tate govern mus t
all citl
1 -1 zimA sh
not believe 3*- t
porations in lieu,
s present supp q'rted
ed that the I language
Ayor Krause s",memo
0
ition for of t1 -cal
DINANCES
a report indicating
tify multiple
e-ViIllage currently
kets and approximately
m0l�6', outs handing
ptr C'",eduresforusing
se multiple offenders
OgTAM'.
eached a unanimous
'd
po
rceei 'Lomme
MPNn-
s
'
o known ,as i
5mentI ;,,h""',' l d 'be
Board some,
ad proposed regulations
�.,the Village.
L'same practices of
De
i
pfitted due to
ja l's First Amendment
Board members related
and expressed their
Eashi on. There was
7hould seek a specli f 3L C
as 'in the area of
ils information be
U41 'it
JAMES A - GEOCARIS
P]RES11)1[wo JX;IDGE
f
GIRCUITGOURT OF - GooR GOT -TNT
THYRD MTjN1C1PALDiSTR1 G T I
December 1, 1.983
The Honorable Carolyn H. Krause
Mayor - Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson ,
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
7166 N. MrL-w,&U3KEE Av7-wlur-
NILES, ILLINOIS 60648
647-7320
Dear Mayor Krause:
ict of the Circuit Court of Cook County, as
The Third Municipal D istr1
,he Circuit Court, 'is in the process
I
authorized by the Chi: of Judge of t am, writing
ity , Servs e Sentencing Program. 1 n te res
ted
of implementing a �ommunI S Ic
not your muni c, i P a I ity �q be , 'I unteer
in order to determine whether or n place ment 're - source for vo
4 1
in participating �in this program a
s a workers. am is now operatianal i*n the Circuit Court of
The prototype of this progr I Illinois.
Cook County , 's Sixth �unicipal Districtlocated in Markham,)That program has beein existence two (2) years during which defendants
have perforrned over 8,000 hours of COMMU n*I ,tY Service Work.
The objectives of this program are as follows:
efendants an alternative means whereby they
1. To offer d debt to society through useful service
can repay their
to the community.
2. To offer public and not-for-profit organizations within
the community:
a. Additional volunteer workers to provide services
which are not avai lable through the use of paid
employees.
1b. An opportunity.to work with these volunteers to
the mutual benefit of the individual and the
organization using their services.
3. To offer the court an additional alternative to incorporate
in the disDositions ,lt finds appropriate.
the Social Service Department of the Court the
,Ut'*I,*zing the services Of
n ected and screened A defendants
is set up
so �that only
carefully sel fled number
programthe court to work as 'volunteers for a sped I
wi 11 he approved by t S corr,�munity Service is designed to be prii,iiarily
of comniunit,-,, service hour
J� lig
Ilp IIS'
- 2 �-
a condition c an order of supervision. Among the requirements for
participation by a defendant is that he was not convicted of a person -
oriented crime and that he does not have an extensive criminal history.
Those persons participating in this program with your municipality will
be assigned specified hours as determined by agreement between the pro-
gram co-ordinator and a representative from your municipality. You
retain the right to reject any person sent to you.
It will be required that someone from your municipality supervise the
volunteer, certify the hours worked on a simple form and that will be pro-
vided, and evaluate the performance of the defendant. The program co-
ordinator will be available to your municipality regarding any issue
that might arise.
Inasmuch as this is a new program in your community, I am not yet aware
of how many volunteers will be available. However, as the program develops,
I anticipate an enthusiastic response by the courts and by the community.
In order to make the corporate authorities of your municipality aware
of the possibility of community service sentencing, I ask that you bring
this letter to the attention of your City Council or Village Board and
your Municipal Attorney.
Included with this letter is a statement on "Liability" as it applies to
your involvement in this program. This statement was prepared by the
Young Lawyers Division, American Bar Association. It has been our ex-
perience that "Liability" is a pertinent issue for municipalities considering
participation in Community Service Programs. It would be helpful if you
would review this with your Muni cipal Attorney.
I am sure that you have questions about this program and your participation,
and I look forward to talking with you. The Program Co-Ordinator,Mr.
Leonard Masor of the Social Service Department, will be in contact with
you within the next couple of weeks. Should you wish to contact him prior to
that, or have a specific person with whom he should talk, he can be reached
at 596-8000- Ext. 2635.
r r�s very truly,
Oli
AME5 A. GEOCARIS
PRESIDING JUDGE
G:bd
enc.
W
... . . . . . . .. . .
MR -11 1`311111, 1519111" 'i'lit N 711,1
2,_�,, 21, 11L.11122 I tli H 1JE2 "M
EA HIS 22
COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAM
CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
THIRD MUNICIPAL DISTRICT
SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT
ISSUES OF CONCERN FOR POTENTIAL PARTICIPATING MUNICIPALITIES:
The experience of municipalities that have participated in Community Service
Programs and other Public Service Work Programs has identified the following
issues that need to be considered by a municipality that is, to involve itself
in such programs. These issues are:
A. Liability of Participating Municipality.
B. Supervision of Volunteers.
A. Li abi I ity
The aforementioned information is intended to assist you in your consid-
eration of the issue of Liability. To determine how it relates to you
specifically, it is recommended that the legal advisor of your municipality
be consulted.
There are two dimensions of liability relative to these p-rograms:
1. Coon tyLP I /Pla Ici n cL eng� For this Prqq am, . the Social Service
De
Illinois Revs -sed Statutes provides immunity: 38:204a -I (d),
38:1005-6-3(g), and 38-,1005-6-3.1(g). Immunity fro�-tortious
actions is provided except for "wilful misconduct or gross
negligence.". All- three references use almost the same
language.
38:1005-6-3.'l(,g):
"Neither the State, any unit of local government, nor any
official or employee thereof acting in'the course of his
official duties shall be liable for any tortious acts of
any person placed on supervision who is given any public
service work as a condition of supervision, except for
wilful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of such
governmental uni t, of f i ci al , or empl oyee.
2. Defendant/Third Partv
. . . ........... ------------- lw_..,
Tfie central issue comprises liability should the defendant
(volunteer) become injured or should defendant (,volunteer)
injure a third party.
If there is "wanton negligence" or "wilful misconduct" on
the part of the County (above,) or on the part of the
participating agency, then that entity is liable.
, " I J� I � " J'�
J K�111_,111 I 11,_'�
011
IL
"If the defendant/volunteer were injured whild per-
forming public service work for a participating
agency,, e.g., by reason of intentional tortious
conduct or negligence of a fellow employee, the
participating agency's liability would depend upon
applicable common law or statutory provisions.
Generally", the participating agency would be able to
guard against or most likely would already be covered
fortis kind of risk under an insurance policy. In
any event,, it is recommended that the agency be advised
to discuss the issue with its insurer. -
"In a situation where a third party, e.g., an agency
employee is in.Jured as a result of the conduct of the
defendant/volunteer, other than by reason of an inten-
tional injury caused by the defendant/volunteer for
strictly personal reasons, the injured agency employee
and agency would be protected under the Workmen's
Compensation Act. If, however, the injured third party
were not an employee of the agency, again the common law
and statutory principles would apply, e.g., negligence
on the part of the agency -in permitting the defendant/
volunteer to perform a particular task. Again, this risk
should be discussed with the agency's insurer." (See page
5, paragraph 1 and 2, "Memorandum" from Young Lai,,ryers
Section, Cbit-d-,go Bar Association, to Social Service Depart-
ment, Circuit Court of Cook County, December 8, 1980,
regarding "Legal Issues Relative to Proposed 'Community
Service Program.'"
Also,see 0. P. Atty. Gen. S-1339 (15 March, 1978.) page 2,,
paragraph 3 for support of same.
If the "wanton negligence" and "wilful misconduct" belongs to the
defendant (volunteer) solely and if the defendant (volunteer) is
injured, he/she is responsible for him/her self. If a third party
is injured due to behavior on part of the defendant (volunteer)
solely, then the defendant (volunteer) is liable.
The abov*e two incidents can be understood as the responsibility
of the defendant/volunteer. Certainly, with proper screening of
candidates, the probability/possibility is greatly minimized.
B. Supervision of Volunteers
The issue around provision of supervision is that the volunteers while
Performirzi-, community service work must be supervised by an employee of
the participating agency. Adequate supervision is essential to the
success cf the program. It is this supervision that insures that the
,��,,�,� . ...... . ...... .
'T Ell SAW", 11"']Z
fflf,�77'
'J, i� U"I M971
Page Three
1�
volunteer completes the agreement. The Program Co-ordinator will rely on
the volunteer's supervisor for information crucial to the outcome of the
work assignment and the community service sentence.
Potential participating agencies may view the ,above mentioned requirements
as sources of additional burdens on already undermanned staffs. The fact
is that, inp'laces, where community service has been luti Ii zed , supervi I si on
of vola
nteers by the partlici"pating agencies has proved to be less problem-
atic than envisioned. The experience of other programs point up the need
for effective planning. It Is the key to offsetting potential problems.
The dimensions of planning suggested are:
1. nature of work to be performed,
2. location of work,
3. number of jobs available, and
4. involvement of existing staff.
Another crucial factor in keeping this area non -problematic is establ i sh-
i n -g and maintaining a line of communication with the Program Co-ordinator,
The Program Co-ordinator is available to discuss these and other issues to
assist in planning for your potential i nvo I vement. To facilitate this
process, ,,,,e request the completion of the form enclosed and the return of
the form to the Program Co-ordinator:
'_Mr. Leonard Mason
Social Service Department
16501 S. Kedzie
Markham, Illinois 60424
596-8000 ext. 2635
....... . . . . .....
l=7�
=LziUiC Wz1.
".1p�e4MZ'
10 M j
Name of Municipality
Mayor, Supervisor, President
Address
Contact Person
Phone Number
Nature of Work
Number of Jobs Available
Location of Work, -
Hours of Work
To Be Supervised by
Nature of Liability and/or Insurance Coverage
. . ........... . . . . .... .... . .........
LI "Al
V
7
7 FINE. 11 wMil
H
. . .... r,,„........ . . . . .. . . 111,111111 E11,1111,11,171"Al Milk, W1111"'I "I
PEER PEDERSEN
RICHARD V, HOUPT
GEORGE I- PLUMB
JAMES K STUCKO
PETER 6CONNELL KELLY
THOMAS J, KELLY
SKELDON DAVIDSON
7—
Dece-n-wer 14, 1983
The Honorable Carolyn H. Krause
Mayor - Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Community Service Program - Third Municipal District
Dear Mayor Krause:
This letter is to advise you that I have reviewed the
Community Service Sentencing Program under consideration by
the Third Municipal District of the Circuit Court of Cook
County, as outlined in correspondence dated December 1, 1983
from Judge Geocaris, the Presiding Judge of the Third Municipal
District, which correspondence was submitted to me on December
5, 1983 by Jay Hedges for review. I have the following com-
ments with respect to this Pr'ogr . am:
1. The Program was originally authorized -in 1977
pursuant to an Act entitled "Public Service
Employment Programs for Probationers", Which
is found in Chapter 38 as Section 204a-1 thereof.
This Act authorized County Boards to establish
and operate agencies for the development and
supervision of such public service programs for
those offenders placed by the Circuit Court on
probation or supervision. Employment programs
to be developed are to include, but not be
limited to, the picking up of litter in public
parks or along public highways, or the maintenance
of public facilities,, and.nooffender assigned to
such public sexV'itle eMP Aovment shall be considered
as an employee for any purpose or otherwise en-
titled to compensation from the County Board.
This Act held the County Board and its officials
to be free from liability for injuries resulting
. . . ......... . .... . ........ . .........
LAW OFFICES
PEDERSEN & HOU PT
GREGORY J, PERRY
A PROFE55IONAL CORPORATION
JAMES J, CLARKE it
STEVEN M STONE
DAVID C. NEWMAN
180 NORTH LASALLE STREET
MARILEE ROSERG
PATRICIA J,, COONS
HERBERT J LINN
MARC 0 JANSER
JAMES K HENEGAN
PAUL'S. ALTMAN
SUITE 3400
THOMAS F. BRETT 01
JEFFREY H. FRANK
J, DAVID BANNER
THEODORE E. CORN— oil
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601
ALLAN 1, NATHAN
ROBERT M. SKOWRONSKI
JONATHAN B. GILBERT
(312) 641-6888
ARTHUR M. HOLTZMAN
DONALD J. 040RAN
LINDA B. #40TZ
RICHARD MMAREST YAW
JOHN P BURKE
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL N0.781-
JOHN H. Mue"i-STEtH
OF COUNSEL
ARTHUR B. So RT40ERG
GERALD I -L PUGH
7—
Dece-n-wer 14, 1983
The Honorable Carolyn H. Krause
Mayor - Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Community Service Program - Third Municipal District
Dear Mayor Krause:
This letter is to advise you that I have reviewed the
Community Service Sentencing Program under consideration by
the Third Municipal District of the Circuit Court of Cook
County, as outlined in correspondence dated December 1, 1983
from Judge Geocaris, the Presiding Judge of the Third Municipal
District, which correspondence was submitted to me on December
5, 1983 by Jay Hedges for review. I have the following com-
ments with respect to this Pr'ogr . am:
1. The Program was originally authorized -in 1977
pursuant to an Act entitled "Public Service
Employment Programs for Probationers", Which
is found in Chapter 38 as Section 204a-1 thereof.
This Act authorized County Boards to establish
and operate agencies for the development and
supervision of such public service programs for
those offenders placed by the Circuit Court on
probation or supervision. Employment programs
to be developed are to include, but not be
limited to, the picking up of litter in public
parks or along public highways, or the maintenance
of public facilities,, and.nooffender assigned to
such public sexV'itle eMP Aovment shall be considered
as an employee for any purpose or otherwise en-
titled to compensation from the County Board.
This Act held the County Board and its officials
to be free from liability for injuries resulting
J
I IF I J"I"WIMM"11,1 21/11
l G
I 1 6 9 ft'"I
The Honorable Carolyn H. Krause
December 14, 1983
Page 2
from the tortious acts of the offender, except
for willful misconduct or gross negligence on the
part of the County or its officials.
2. As part of the conditions of a sentence of probation
or a sentence of supervision the Court is authorized
to direct the offender to "per'form some reasonable
public service work such as but not limited to the
picking up of litter in public parks or along public
highways or the maintenance of public facilities",
which conditions are contained in Section 1005-6-3(b)
(10) and Section 1005-6-3.1(c)(10). Both of these
Sections contained in Chapter 38 also provide, in
Subparagraph (g) that "neither the State, any unit
of local government, nor any official or employee
thereof acting in the course of his official duties
shall be liable for any tortious acts of any person
placed an probation (or supervision) who is given
any public service work as a condition of probation
(supervision) except the willful misconduct or gross
negligence on the part of such Governmental unit,
Official, or employee".
3. The subject Program has been implemented successfully
within the Sixth Municipal District and has been
administered by the Social Service Department of the
Court which has established the program and has care-
fully selected and screened offenders to be approved
for community service work. One of the requirements
for eligibility is that the offender must not be con-
victed of a person -oriented crime, nor have an extensive
criminal histor17.
4. "The Local Government and Governmental Employees Tort
Immunity Act" (set forth in Chapter 85, Section 1-101
et. seq. of the Illinois Revised Statutes) prevents a
municipality and its officials from being liable for
injuries sustained by the offender while participating
in such Program within the municipality, in most in-
stances except wherein such injury is caused by willful
and wanton negligence on the part of the municipality
or one of its employees.
r
va 7'',34 6", ZIA I W, U
INWIMEITW MOPE,,, " I � , , , an, , �
a
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
4
The Honorable Carolyn H. Krause
December 14, 1983
Page 3
5. Injuries occasioned to municipal employees by an
offender participating in sucha program within
a municipality would ordinarily,be handled in the
same manner as all, other injuries occasioned to
mu.n1cipal employees while perform,ing their duties
ion behalf of' the municipality'. In most respects
th,is, )would involve workmen's compensation.
Most of these points 'were pointed out in the correspondence
from Judge Geocaris. My review, therefore, substantiates the
fact that such a program has been authorized by Statute to
be established and admil"nistered by the pertinent County in
cooperation with the'Courts, such Program has been authorized
as a part . of the conditions of the'sentence involving probation
or supervision, and participation in such a Program by the
Village of Mount Prospect. would (in the absence'i willful
or wanton negligence) not subject the municipality or its
supervisory personnel to liability for.injuries I -resulting from
the conduct of the offender participating in the program within
the Village.
I am therefore of the opinion that the proposed Public
Service Program is a laudable one and can be of benefit to the
Village by providing additional workers for park and roadway
cleanup chores, in a setting where contact with large segments
of the public would be kept to a minimum. I therefore reconnen
this Program for participation by.the Village of Mount Pros'pecti
Very truly yours,
David C. Newman
DCN: lgd
cc: Mr. Jay Hedges
Village of Mount Prospec
Mount Prospect, Illinois i
I
'INTEROFFICE
TO: Terrance L. Burgharld, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Director of Management Services
DATE: January 6, 1984
SUBJECT: Water and Sewer Fund Financing Requirements
In an undertaking the size of the Lake Michigan Water Project, it is only
natural that the plan for financing the Village's commitment to the project
be re-evaluated ' 'and updated on a periodic basis. The original financing plan
called for a combination of property tax revenues and receipts from water
sales to provide the necessary funds for the project. That plan was modified
in December 1982 to reflect more current cost estimates and the use of bond
proceeds for interim financing. Additionally, the modified plan provided for
changes in the apportionment of tax revenues and water receipts during the
early years of the project. Recently, we received an update of Joint Action
Water Agency cost projections for the period of May 1, 1984 through April 30,
1992 from John Nuveen & Co. Using these projections and preliminary 1984/85
Village budget information, I have prepared a schedule of estimated revenues
and expenditures for the Water and Sewer Fund covering the period of May 1,,
1983 through April 30, 1992. Also, as a necessary part of developing this
schedule, I have revised the estimated property tax rates and water rates that
will be required during this period.
Attached Schedule I contains estimated water and sewer revenues and expenditures
for the period of May 1, 1983 through April 30, 1992, and Schedule 2 is a
comparison of tax rates and water rates that were previously estimated and
that have been revised in light of current information.
It should be pointed out that in Schedule 1 the revenue line -item "Transfer
from SSA #5" consists of transfers of the current balance of bond proceeds and
future tax revenues in SSA #5 - Lake Michigan Water Construction Fund to the
Water and Sewer Fund. The intention is to use available monies in SSA #5 to
offset expenditure line -items: Water Agency - Deposit, and Water Agency -
Fixed Costs. Also, it should be noted that the opening Cash Balances from
1986 through 1991 are in the range of $900,000 to $1,000,000. Although this
appears to be a large amount, it is mandatory as there will be a draw -down
during the year of approximately $600,000 due to the timing of property tax
receipts in SSA #5 and scheduled monthly payouts to the Water Agency. The
balance is -necessary for working cash.
In Schedule 2 it can be seen that the property tax rates in original financing
plan (Column 3) projected a rate of 44� per $100 A.V. for the 1982 tax levy
and reached a peak of 52+, in 1984. The December 1982 revised rates (Column 4)
Provided for 9� in 1982, 25� in 1983 and then increased 5� per year to reach
a peak of 53� in 1989. The current estimates in Column 5 reflect an actual
71-11111111-1 N�
"71", '11' X", 31 fl""3(111303/0 D
Ter an e. Burghard
Page 2
Water and Sewer Fund Financing Requirements
ti
rate of 8.2� in 1982, an estimated 24.1in 1983 and a peak of 43.11 in
1987. The rate declines after that point to an estimated 36.9in 1990.
Water rates for the original financing plan and the two revisions are shown
in the last three columns. It can be noted that in December 1982 a rate of
$2.19 per 1000 gallons was projected for the period of May lt 1984 to
April 30, 1987, at which time the rate jumps to $2.91 per 1000 gallons. In
the most recent revision, a rate of $2.07 has been estimated for May 19 1984
to April 30, 1986, with the rate then increasing to $2.4.7. $2.625 $2.91 and
finally $3.12 in 1991/92.
It should be emphasized that the information presented is based upon projec-
tions and future estimates are subject to change. However, it appears that
a rate of $2.07 per 1000 gallons rather than the previously projected rate of
9
$2.19 is adequate for the fiscal year starting May 1, 1984.
Another factor that should be considered when water rates are increased on
May 1, 1984 is the impact of higher bills on water customers. A residential
customer who uses 7,500 gallons per month is currently paying a quarterly
water and sewer bill of $34.43. With the proposed rates, the quarterly bill
of the same customer will increase to $49.50 starting May 1, 1984. Even
though this amount is less than what was previously anticipated, it is still
a significant increase. One of the ways that can be used to minimize the
immediate effect of a higher bill on water customers is to change from a
quarterly billing cycle to a bi-monthly cycle. While this approach does not
reduce the total amount a customer will be charged, it does reduce the amount
of each bill. Under a bi-monthly cycle, the customer who uses 7,500 gallons
per month would receive a bi-monthly water and sewer bill of $33.00 compared
to $49.50 under a quarterly billing cycle.
The estimated amount of a typical residential customer's water and sewer bill
under a quarterly and a bi-monthly billing cycle for the period of May 1, 1983
April 30, 1992 is shown in attached Schedule 3. This schedule uses the
Janucary lK revised rates that are listed in Schedule 2. It can be seen from
the anicunt-s �,n Schedule 3 that a b�-monthly billing cycle will produce what I
believe is -a more acceptable amount for a water and sewer bill.
There are additional costs that would result in a change from a quarterly to
a bi-monthly cycle. If the change is made, the number of bills mailed and
receipts received would increase from 42,000 per year to 63,000 per year. It
is estimated that this increased volume would add $10,000 per year in costs for
postage and supplies. However, there are advantages to the customer and the
Village by adopting a bi-monthly billing schedule. One advantage to the
customer, in addition to a lower bill, is that there would be a reduced time
from when water was used to the time it was billed. This could help to detect
and resolve water leaks sooner than if the bills are prepared quarterly. An
advantage to the Village is the fact that cash flow in the Water and Sewer Fund
will be improved and there would be a one-time increase in water collections of
$1255000 to $140,000 during 1984/85.
... 1 ... . . "�1!111 f -
w, . .... . . " - '-I 1/71/.�wl'"= =,M.13MM W=MT
.. Z11-1-11"r�wl�=F11; "WM, 7/s,
"-7-1l=,XTXW,N
Terrance � L . 8u rg hard
Page 3
14 Water and Sewer Fund Financing Requirements
If we change to a bi -monthly billing cycle, we would need to change our
billing districts from three to four. We would then bill twice a month
(four billing cycles in two months) rather than once a month as is currently
being done. After the districts are changed and when it is closer to the
time that the bi -monthly billing will take effect, we could send a notice .to
each customer informing them a.s to when they can expect water bills in the
future and what the near rates w l l be: This would hep to reduce possible
confusi o r :.
The Finance Department will continue to monitor the, financial position of the
Water and Sewer Fund and keep you informed when there are any significant
changes.
The current water rate of ,$1.40 is scheduled to increase to $1.97 effective
May 1, 1984 per Ordinance No. 3288 that was adopted on October 5, 1982. If
we are to increase the rate to $2.07 on May 1, a new ordinance will have to
be adopted.
Water
and Sewer Fund
Schedule 1
Estimated Revenues and Expenditures
May 1, 1983 - April 30,
1992
- - 12 Month
Period Ending
- -
4/30/84
4/30/85
4/30/86
4/30/87
4/30/88
4/30/89
_ 4/30/90
4/30/91
4/30/92
Opening Cash Balance
$150539300
678,700
$1,014,700
$ 9589700
$ 880,300
$ 893,900
$ 9949040
9819500
7729400
Revenues:
Water Sales
15995,900
$299482200
$259623200
$3,5515200
$355679900
$3,8x2,300
$3,820,000
$4,262400
$4,591,100
Sewer Sales
184,300
1859200
1865000
186,900
187,800
188,700
189,500
190,400
191,300
Transfer from SSA #5 369,700
195769600
19808,700
152625600
154645000
11550,600
115015300
114895200
11476,800
Other Revenue
1645700
1589200
194,600
199,800
193,700
200,500
2135200
220,200
217,200
Total Revenue
2,7151600
4,868,2
$5,151,500
5,200 00
554139400
$5,742,10
5,724, 04
6,1625200
$654761400
Expenditures:
Local -Operation
& Maintenance
$25126,500
$23390,600
$198995000
$12950,000
$2,0499000
$292195000
$254045000
$256052000
$258275400
Debt Service
4115500
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
s
Capi tal Improve=-
ments
1825500
5659000
963000
207,000
132,000
218,500
959000
312,004
2602000
Total -Local
X2,/20,500
$2,9559600
$1,905,00
21157,000
21181,400
$2,4373500
$254995000
x2,917,000
$33087,000
Water Agency -Deposit $ 28,400
$ 925500
1315000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 35900
$ 7,100
Water Agency -O & M
28,200-
1,4465100
-11433,200
11537,900
15653,900
11736,200
138655500
15976,700
Water Agency -
Fixed Costs
3139100
11484,100
15715,404
1,698,700
11680,900
1,5505600
155019300
1,4853300
15469,700
Total -
Water Agency
$ 369,700
$1,576,600
$3,292,500
$3,1311900
$352185800
$332045500
$31,2373500
$354543700
$394531,500
Total
Expenditures
$3,090,200
$45532,200
$531979500
$53288,900
$553995800
$5,6425000
$557365500
$6,3715700
$695403500
Excess (Deficiency)
Revenues Over
Expenditures
(374,600)
336,000
(465000)
(88,400)
139600
140,100
(123500)
(2095500)
(642100)
Ending Cash Balance
$ 678,700
$13014,700
$ 9685700
$ 880,300
$ 8931,900
$ 9943000
$ 981,500
$ 772,000
$ 7073900
Year of
Tax Levy
Fiscal
Year of
Collection
Original
Tax Rates
Lake Michigan Water
Estimated Tax Rates and
May 1, 1983 - April
Dec.1982 dan.1984
Revised Revised
Rates Rates(i)
Project
Water Rates
30, 1992
Fiscal
Year of
Collection
original
Water
Rate(2)
Schedule 2
Dec.1982 Jan.1984
Revised Revised
Rates Rates
1982
4/30/84
44�
9�
8.2�
4/30/84
$1.97
$1.40
$1.40
1983
4%30/85
44�
25�
24.1
4/30/85
$1.97
$2.19
$2.07
1984
4/30/85
52�
29�
29.0
4/30/85
$1.97
$2.19
$2.07
1985
4/30/87
48�
34�
34.0
4/30/87
?
$2.19
$2.47
1985
4/30/88
43�
39�
39.0
4/30/88
?
$2.91
$2.47
1987
4/30/89
43�
44c
43.1
4/30/89
?
$2.91
$2.62
1988
4/30/90
43�
49�
41.5
4/30/90
?
$2.91
$2.62
1989
4/30/91
43�
53�
39.2
4/30/91
?
$2.91
$2.91
1990
4/30/92
43t
53t
36.9
4/30/92
4
?
$2.91
$3.12
1 Assures
3% Annual
Increase in
2 Original
water rate
projection
did not
Assessed valuation
extend beyond 4/30%86
Estimated Water
and Sewer Bill
Schedule
3
Typical Residential Customer'
5/1/83 -
4%30/92
12 Month
Period
Rate
per 1000 Gals.
Quarterly
Billing
Bi -Monthly
Billing
Endin
Water
Sewer Total
1000 Gals.
Amount
1000 Gals.
Amount
4/30/84
$1.40
$ .13 $1.53
22.5
$34.43
N/A
N/A
4/30/85
2.07
.13 2.20
22.5
49.50
15
$33.00
4/30/85
2.07
.13 2.20
22.5
49.50
15
33.00
4/30/87
2.47
.13 2.50
22.5
58.50
15
39.00
4/30/88
2.47
.13 2.60
22.5
58.50
15
39.00
4%30/89
2.62
.13 2.75
22.5
51.88
15
41.25
4/30%90
2.62
.13 2.75
22.5
61.88
15
41.25
4/30/91
2.91
.13 3.04
22.5
68.40
15
45.60
4/30/92
3.12
.13 3.25
22.5
70.88
15
48.75