The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10.2 1st reading of an ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1-27 W. PROSPECT AVENUE, 150 S. MAIN STREET (PROSPECT PLACE)FebruaryItem Cover Page wubject 1st reading of an ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1-27 W. PROSPECT AVENUE, 150 S. MAIN STREET (PROSPECT PLACE) Meeting PROSPECT BOARD 'iscal Impact a _, ActionType l(mieldliram The Petitioner is proposing • redevelop the site known as "Prospect construct a mixed-use building with related improvements. The building would be two- bedroom) averaging 91 ! - feetApproximately, 1 1 square feet of retail space proposed • - first floor• !; with residentiald a lobby space.Parking is to be provided •• grade behind the building ! in the basement level. Site ingress and egress would be provided off Evergreen Avenue and Wille Street. The Petitioner is proposing to invest over $26 million in this downtown district project, increasing the property's equalized assessed value nearly six -fold from its current value. The developer, First Equity Group, has invested in Mount Prospect before. Last year, the Petitioner began construction of 10 N. Main Street,, a 5 -story,, 97 -unit apartment building located at the northwest corner of Central Road and Main Street on the northern end of downtown Mount Prospect. Now nearing completion, the class 'A" apartment building is complete with fitness and rooftop amenity spaces. The Petitioner is seeking to replicate their success at the Subject Property 1 Staffit Main Street and Prospect Avenue. the Petitioner"s , reviewed !+, • !' conditional •' allow ! mixed- use_.> revitalize an underutilized property in the downtown area, and the proposal to construct a 5 -story mixed-use building comprised of 80 dwelling units and 10"234 square feet of retail space is consistent with the Village"s Downtown Implementation Plan and the Village"s Comprehensive Plan. The development will not have a detrimental impact on the public and not be injurious to surrounding properties. The proposed project is consistent with the trend of development in the area. Several multi -story apartment buildings are located to the north and east of the Subject Property,, downtown commercial properties lie to the west, and a religious institution and vacant commercial property lie to the south. Further, the Village"s Comprehensive Plan identifies the Subject Property as being part of the downtown area and suggests a mix of commercial and residential uses be allowed. The Petitioner itraffic which. The volume of traffic projected to be generated by the proposed developmen- will be reduced due to the proximity of the development to the Moun Prospect Metra Train Station, which qualifies the development as a TOD. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the proposed developmen traffic will not have a significant impact on the area roadways. The development -generated traffic will only add approximately one percen' and three percent of the traffic projected to be traversing the intersection o' Main Street with Prospect Avenue during the weekday morning and evenin( peak hours, respectively. The proposed mixed-use development will be replacing an existing 18 80 square -foot commercial development that is currently generating traffic. A<. suchf the traffic generated by the proposed development will not be all ne traffic • the roadway Given the grid system serving the downtown area,, access to the site i provided via a number of routes, thereby distributing traffic along man different routes. Overallf the existing road network has sufficient carrying capacity t• accommodate the development as proposed. 2 The proposed conditional use will be located in the downtown area of the Village, on I site currently • •' with • partially vacant buildings ! are in poor repair. The • •' development • , an attractive mixed-use apartment Ordinance.building to the downtown area that further diversifies the rental housing stock available. The proposal will have no significant impact on traffic conditions in the vicinity and a very limited impact on the adjacent neighborhoods, utility provision, and public streets. The proposed conditional use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan,, Downtown Implementation Plan,, Strategic Plan,, and Zoning The case was initially heard at the January 14th Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing. After hearing concerns regarding traffic and on-site parking, the Petitioner substantially altered the proposal to mitigate potential development impacts. Revisions include: Parking. To better satisfy the Village's parking requirements,, the Petitioner 1 - bedroom units• that the unit mix is now an even split of • . • two-bedroo units (40:40). They also added 13 underground parking stalls by installing eleven tandem spaces, and restriping the remaining spaces. The Petitioner's initial submittal '• '• 104 parking stalls for. •` p• of • 1 but now requires 100 parking stalls to meet Village Code (due to the change in bedroom type). The project now provides 94 on-site parking spaces and has a parking ratio of 1.18 parking stalls per unit. The additional underground parking added to the plans results in a reduction in the amount of parking spaces being requested in an offsite parking agreement. The Petitioner is seeking this agreement to lease 6 parking stalls in the Wille Street parking lot to increase the amount of parking provided for its residents, and to meet Village parking code requirements (1-3 parking stalls per unit). This agreement will be separate from the Conditional Use ordinance, and will be reviewed for potential approval by the Village Board in conjunction with the project's redevelopment agreement. Additional details are provided in the attached "Prospect Place Update" memo. Traffic. Given the public commentary provided at the January 14,, 2021 public hearing with the Planning and Zoning Commission,, KLOA drafted an addendum to address traffic along Wille Street specifically. See attached "KLOA Memo", which indicates the proposed development is projected to have little impact on Wille Street given the nature of the project, its location., existing street layout and roadway .,,.' 3 These revised plans and addendum were presented at the continuation of the public '. • held on .ry 28, 2021, with the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the revised project by • • Staff recommends approval of the development as presented with the following conditions: a. A Plat of Resubdivision consolidating all of the parcels and dedicating any required easements shall be submitted for review and approval; b. Securing a parking agreement with the Village of Mount Prospect to utilize six (6) parking spaces at the Wille Street parking lot; c. Submittal of landscape, irrigation, and photometric plans that comply with Village codesd regulations d. Compliance with all Development, Fire,, Building, and other Village codes and !, • e. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Jonathan Splitt• dated January1 f. Development of the building in general conformance with the plans prepared by Jonathan! dated January1 g. Pursuant to the KLOA Traffic Study recommendation,, visual warning devices shall be provided at the garage exit to the satisfaction of the Village Manager. Alternatives 1. Approve a Conditional Use for a final planned unit development (PUD) consisting of a five -story, eighty (80) unit apartment building with ten thousand two hundred thirty-four (10,,234) square feet of commercial space and • garage !. •i spaces and • gradl.. parking spaces,• • the conditionsof approval list'• in the abovs memo. 2. Action at the discretion of the Village Board. Staff Recommendation Approval• 1. A Conditional use for a final planned unit development (PUD) consisting of a five -story, eighty (80) unit apartment building with ten thousand two hundred thirty-four (10,234) square feet of commercial space and seventy- • garage parking spaces and ' • • .';!'` parking spaces, •' • the conditionslisted in the staff! • •t that the plan dates be updated to reflect the Petitioner's revised plan set. 4 ATTACHMENTS Staff Report.pdf Revised Plans.pdf Prospect Place Update.pdf Ad m i n i strative_Co ntent. pdf KLOA Memo.pdf KLOA_Traffic_Im pact_Study_Proposed_Residential_Development. pdf Public Comment.pdf Jan.28.21_PZ-24-20-1-W-Prospect-Ave_Minutes_(2nd meeting).pdf Jan.14.21_PZ-24-20_1-W-Prospect-Ave_Minutes. pdf 5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 .............................. - — ----- STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development William J. Cooney, A1CP Jason C. Shallcross, AICP Director of Community Development Development Review Planner ............. DATE: January 7th 2020 CASE NUMBER PZ -24-20 PUBLIC HEARING DATE January 14, 2021 BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER Prospect Place Development Partners, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 1-- 27 W. Prospect Avenue, 150 S. Main Street Prospect Place Development Partners, LLC, the "Petitioner", is proposing to construct a five -story, mixed- use planned unit development (PUD) consisting of 80 rental units and 10,250 square feet of retail space. The Village Code requires conditional use approval for a PUD that allows for unified zoning control over the entire mixed-use development. The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as Downtown Mixed -Use. The proposed use complies with the primary and secondary uses in the district and the conditional use standards. Staff is supportive of the request. 2017 Aerial Image 2020 Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Map EXISTING EXISTING LAND USE/SITE SURROUNDING ZONING St LAND USE SIZE OF ZONING IMPROVEMENTS North: 13-5C Core Central Commercial, PROPERTY B-5 Central A multi -tenant commercial mixed-use development and commercial 0.821 acres Commercial shopping center East: B-5 Central Commercial, commercial District South: R -A Single Family and B-5 Central Commercial, religious institution and vacant West: B-5 Central Commercial, commercial, public parking, and residential STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVE <ZEE ---------------------------------------- . ................... ------- Subject Property The Subject Property, commonly known as 'Prospect Place', consists of 5 separate parcels and 2 existing primary structures. A once -vibrant commercial center, Prospect Place has suffered from some long-standing vacancies and a lack of investment from property ownership. The center consists of 18,880 square feet of ground level commercial space with 30 surface parking spaces and is located on a highly visible corner in the downtown district. The center is currently home to six tenants including Al's Shoe Service, Colonial Dental Associates, Nikki's Hair Salon, Purple Rose Florist, Prospect Avenue Cleaners, and Sam's Place. The Petitioner and Village staff have met with each of the tenants to discuss possible relocation options if this project moves forward. The Village's goal is to keep these tenants in the downtown district if possible. Discussions are ongoing and will continue as this project moves through the entitlement process. - - - - ------- Summary of Proposal ............ .. . . The Petitioner is proposing to clear the entire site and construct a mixed-use building with related improvements. The building would be a 5 -story structure that would contain 80 rental units (32 one - bedroom, 48 two-bedroom) averaging 903 square feet in size. Approximately 10,250 square feet of retail space is proposed on the first floor along with residential amenities and a lobby space. Parking is to be provided both at grade behind the building and in the basement level. Site ingress and egress would be provided off Evergreen Avenue and Wille Street. The Petitioner is proposing to invest over $26 million in the downtown district, increasing the property's equalized assessed value nearly sixfold from its current value. The developer, First Equity Group, has invested in Mount Prospect before. Last year, the Petitioner began construction of 10 N. Main Street, a 5 -story, 97 -unit apartment building located at the northwest corner of Central Road and Main Street on the northern end of downtown Mount Prospect. Now nearing completion, the class 'A' apartment building is complete with fitness and rooftop amenity spaces. The Petitioner is seeking to replicate their success at the Subject Property at Main Street and Prospect Avenue. Site Plan — The site plan indicates the building will front on Prospect Avenue with residential entrances located on both the front (north) and rear (south) of the building and access to the proposed commercial spaces on the western, northern, and eastern sides of the building. A pickup lane is proposed at the rear of the property, adjacent to the proposed 22 at -grade parking spaces. A loading berth and trash enclosures are proposed at the rear (southwest) corner of the building, and a ramp to basement level parking is proposed at the rear of the structure as well. Floor Plans — The floor plans indicate 59 interior parking spaces are to be provided on the lower level of the building for residents. Four commercial tenant spaces totaling 10,.234 square feet and a lobby, fitness area, and bike room are proposed on the first floor in addition to trash, electric, and mechanical areas. Large outdoor patio spaces are proposed at either end of the building to service potential dining establishments. Village staff are not aware of any secured tenants for these spaces at this time. Eighty (80) residential dwelling units, consisting of 32 one -bedroom apartments and 48 two-bedroom apartments would be located on the 2"d to 51h floors. All of the units would come with recessed outside balconies and residents would share a 2,569 square foot roof deck, 1,914 square foot green roof, and a 1,222 square foot rooftop amenity space. 2 r -A Lot Cover, —The B5 District does not have a lot coverage limitation. The site plan indicates limited greenspace is to be provided along the southern property line and near the southern building entrance. The petitioner is proposing to satisfy stormwater requirements by locating storm sewer pipes underneath the proposed at grade parking lot. Bui1di,ng Ele,vations, — The design of the proposed building by Jonathan Splitt Architects is a different take on the more modern loft designs the Village has seen in the past several redevelopment projects. The previous projects sought to mimic old factories that had been converted into a mixed-use building by applying lighter materials into and over the "existing" masonry facades. Corners were occasionally carved away to lighten the feel of the masonry and the use of cement board panels and siding became a standard of construction. The design for Prospect Place begins with the same monolithic masonry block, but stays true to a historical form. The proposal includes three main materials: brick, steel, and glass, with some stone accents that blend in color with the brick. While the term block sometimes can mean simple or boring, the proposed building facade has a number of vertical and horizontal depth changes to break up the elevations, making the building form overall look like a series of masonry blocks and adding character to the structure. The design draws on two different concepts that complement one another. The corners and middle sections are a black brick that is raised on a one-story glass and steel base. The steel super structure becomes the detail that a traditional stone base would provide and allows for large expanses of glass. The black brick fagade above has very little masonry detail in favor of larger floor to ceiling glazing that houses the more public spaces within each apartment unit beyond. While balconies are recessed into the fagade, they appear to be lighter and more open due to the lack of roof over each vertical stack. The red brick portions of the building speak a different language altogether. A more solid masonry fapde with smaller punched openings protect the bedrooms in the units beyond. A more traditional masonry sill supports the window openings, while the exposed steel lintels tie back to the base of the opposite black architecture. In stark contrast to the balconies in the black masonry sections, these balconies feel more enclosed due to the heavy roof and head over each vertical stack. While the traditional stone sills, detail band, and cornice are used like a more traditional architecture, they are colored to match the brick. This is a more modern concept to provide detail, but not stand out while doing so. The rooftop elements are also depicted as being brick, which is an upgrade from some of the more recent developments. The use of a trellis to frame the rooftop amenity space is a nice offset from the heavy nature of the rest of the building and fits in well visually with the rest of the building. On the south side of the building there are some covered spaces on the first floor that are supported by brick piers. The open nature of the first floor gives the south side of the building a lighter feel for what is actually a fairly heavy and massive building. The angled entry to the garage ramp will help cut down on headlights shining into neighboring properties and is a well thought out design feature. The corners of the building set up well for some outdoor retail or outdoor dining if a restaurant were to be secured. The spacious outdoor patio and sidewalk spaces will be able to accommodate many tables and chairs. Additional dining activity on Prospect Avenue west of Main Street would be a boon for businesses in that area and generate more foot traffic in the Village's downtown. 3 Overall, this building is very well thought out architecturally. It can be a nice bridge between some of Mount Prospect's older, more traditional designs and some of the more modern designs that have been proposed and constructed in the past several years. Parlin The Village Code requires 1 space per unit for one -bedroom units and 1.5 spaces per unit for two- bedroom units. With 48 two-bedroom units and 32 one -bedroom units proposed, 104 residential parking spaces are required. The proposal provides 22 surface parking spaces and 59 basement spaces. The Petitioner is seeking a parking agreement to secure the usage of 23 parking stalls in the adjacent Wille Street parking lot with the Village to allow residents to park overnight, ultimately providing the project with 1.3 parking stalls per dwelling unit and satisfying the Village's downtown residential parking requirements. At 10,234 square feet, the commercial portion of the project requires 31 parking stalls per Village Code. However, with 49 on street parking stalls located in the immediate vicinity of the Subject Property and an additional 27 spaces available after 6:00pm in the Wille Street parking lot, staff is confident that area parking available will satisfy the commercial parking demand for this project. The existing center is 18,880 square feet and has 29 parking stalls. If constructed today, the Village Code would require 66 on-site parking stalls. a Land'scapinia, —The pedestrian rights of way along Prospect Avenue, Wille Street and Evergreen Avenue will be improved with the standard Village streetscape design that includes planters, trees and other amenities. An array of bushes, trees, and grasses are proposed along Wille Street and Evergreen Avenue at the rear of the building and surrounding the proposed parking lot, meeting Village Code requirements. lighthiing — Staff will work with the Petitioner to ensure all lighting for the project meets code and that the pedestrian lighting installed as part of this project is consistent with the downtown area. Village Code specifies that all exterior lighting consist of full cutoff luminaries with a total cutoff angle of not more than 90 degrees, and it also requires flat lenses for all lighting fixtures. Schools — With 80 residential dwelling units proposed as part of this project, school aged children will likely be generated. Staff used generation rates based on the School Consulting Services' 1996 study of the Chicago Metropolitan Area to project that the proposed development will generate between 8 and 9 children, with approximately 6 going to D57 schools and 3 going to D214 schools. It should be noted that state TIF statutes require the Village pay all applicable school districts an annual payment for any students generated by housing developments located in the TIF district. The payment is equal to the average cost the district incurs to educate each pupil; therefore, the school districts are made whole for the cost of educating any students generated by this project. This dollar amount is adjusted each year as costs of education change. Traffic —The Petitioner has retained Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA) to prepare a traffic evaluation of the potential impact that the project would have on surrounding streets in the downtown area. KLOA found that the proposed development will not have a significant impact on area roadways, adding one percent and three percent of the traffic projected to be traversing the intersection of Main 4 9 Street with Prospect Avenue during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Existing levels of service for Wille Street, Prospect Avenue, and Evergreen Street will be maintained as well, with only minor delay increases along eastbound Evergreen Avenue turning right onto Main Street and southbound Wille Street turning left onto Evergreen Avenue. There is also an increase in delay for northbound Wille Street at Prospect Avenue, as the vast majority of traffic generated from this proposal is projected to use Evergreen Avenue and Prospect Avenue to travel to and from the site. The proposal is projected to generate 12 southbound trips on Wille Street south of Evergreen during morning peak travel times and 13 during evening peak travel times, having a minimal impact on the neighborhood to the south and west. The traffic study produced by KLOA also stated that the improvements identified in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study will significantly enhance the flow of traffic within the downtown area and will reduce vehicle delay and queueing, reducing the impact of the proposed development. Lastly, the report states that the proposed parking to be provided on site, in combination with the adjacent parking, will ensure that adequate parking is provided to accommodate the project's projected parking demand. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as Downtown Mixed -Use, which consists of a diverse mix of uses and supports the development of a vibrant downtown. A key characteristic of the district is to encourage the provision of high-density residential uses that include a variety of unit types, price ranges, and ownership and rental options. Retail and medium to high-density multi -family residential uses are primary and secondary uses in the district. The proposed development is consistent with the long- range goals of the Village Comprehensive Plan. COMPATIBILITY WITH VILLAGE CODE The standards for conditional uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a conditional use. The following list is a summary of these findings: • The conditional use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; 9 The conditional use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and • The request is in compliance of the conditional use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The Petitioner states that the proposed development will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The Petitioner states further that the use is compatible with adjoining properties and appropriately scaled to fit in downtown Mount Prospect. The Petitioner believes that the project will enhance the property's value and be an improvement to an otherwise partially vacant, underutilized, and dilapidated property. The Petitioner states that the proposal will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding properties, with all surrounding properties already developed. The Petitioner states that they will install new improvements to public utilities, roads, and drainage systems as needed to accommodate the project's demand. 5 10 Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for a conditional use to allow a mixed-use PUD and finds that the standards have been met. The proposed PUD will revitalize an underutilized property in the downtown area, and the proposal to construct a 5 -story mixed-use building comprised of 80 dwelling units and 10,234 square feet of retail space is consistent with the Village's Downtown Implementation Plan and the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The development will not have a detrimental impact on the public and be in no way injurious to surrounding properties. The proposed development is consistent with the trend of development in the area. Several multi -story apartment buildings are located to the north and east of the Subject Property, downtown commercial properties lie to the west, and a religious institution and vacant commercial property lie to the south. Further, the Village's Comprehensive Plan identifies the Subject Property as being part of the downtown area and suggests a mix of commercial and residential uses be allowed. The proposed conditional use will be located in the downtown area of the Village, on a site currently underutilized with two partially vacant buildings that are in poor repair. The proposed development adds an attractive mixed-use apartment building to the downtown area that further diversifies the rental housing stock available. The proposal will have no significant impact on traffic conditions in the vicinity and a very limited impact on the adjacent neighborhoods, utility provision, and public streets. The proposed conditional use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Downtown Implementation Plan, Strategic Plan, and Zoning Ordinance. Staff finds that the proposal meets the conditional use standards and that granting such request would be in the best interest of the Village. Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: 1. A Conditional Use for a final planned unit development (PUD) consisting of a five -story, eighty (80) unit apartment building with ten thousand two hundred thirty-four (10,234) square feet of commercial space and fifty-nine (59) garage parking spaces and twenty-two (22) at grade parking spaces, subject to the following conditions of approval: a. A Plat of Resubdivision consolidating all of the parcels and dedicating any required easements shall be submitted for review and approval; b. Securing a parking agreement with the Village of Mount Prospect to utilize twenty-three (23) parking spaces at the Wille Street parking lot; c. Submittal of landscape, irrigation, and photometric plans that comply with Village codes and regulations; d. Compliance with all Development, Fire, Building, and other Village codes and regulations; e. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Jonathan Splitt Architects Ltd. dated January 5th, 2021; and f. Development of the building in general conformance with the plans prepared by Jonathan Splitt Architects Ltd. dated December loth, 2020" The Village Board's decision is final for this case. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENT PLANS OTHER ATTACHMENTS: Zoning Request Application, Responses to, Plat of Survey, Site Plan, et o, (Supplemental Information, Public Standards, etc..., Comments Received, etc... 101 ilk I Concur: i William J. Co ney, AICA Director of Community Devel M ent ifi X W z Cn Q Cn Cn J �zQ� z�zz > z J CLO Z z LU LU LL. O CL 0 0 Q O Q QCD QCE) z Q C J -CD (� CD C O _Z _Z O CL m W W U W O C=J J im W WCJC7C'7CJN��HOJOW Wiz v Z cc: W z =z_z_z__zzQQzo�O��o �ocFFE C-)L.)JJ�zzi<— Jc�c��" �adS z LU0_co — fm p[W W W W < -- W~ W D D D [] 0 C] W U 2 0 0 0 J J O~z C>:-) z z z w z z z z LU z z��X Q O W W W W Q Q Q_= O J U C]C C]C DC [JC Cn J J m LL w m m U W W O Q = Q D- J Cf) MM CL a_ 'CA) N N N N O N O O O r- N M- N r- N O O O O O N N N N M M�� 7 N W U U M 1 r z LU a LU o � W - 0 0 0 0 LU w ' w U Q J U) go�F IL LU x a w a CL LZ frO U) Z 0 N 7 0 = a_ N N aSSoo C 0 O CL a 0 0 0 a r — � o m Cco M D > I- N N 00 70 C7 W t O r C7 V O O i O N O GO N C X J (G O n � - r W O o o M O O m CO (6 co _U C O ._ M 0 G CJ C.7 zz zz cc O O O Q Q fm zz W z z CL a_ 'CA) N N N N O N O O M 1 r z LU a LU o � W - 0 0 0 0 LU w ' w U Q J U) go�F IL LU x a w a CL LZ frO U) Z 0 N 7 0 = a_ N N aSSoo C 0 O CL a 0 0 0 a r — � o m Cco M D > I- N N 00 70 C7 W t O r C7 V O O i O N O GO N C X J (G O n � - r W O o o M O O m CO (6 co _U C O ._ M 0 G Tmm T" --(c5j z w a- 0 O w ac w O C, o p 0 w w � w W c=i> a- X w w a a H O N z d r N LO 0 a N N 0_ 000 r O z 0 Q Q F- LU O rrz c� z 0 0 J W r z w a- 0 O w ac w O C, o p 0 w w � w W (1) c=i> X w w a a H O N d r N z Ilt n 0Z:)�a N N 0_ 000 r O H U W CL C!1 O rr C.D z 0 J Q J Q U W O U O O J L.L C/1 O W OEF Allf f to 1 r z w a- 0 O w ac w O cl o p 0 w w � w c) c=i> X w w a a H O N d r N z Ilt n 0Z:)�a N N 0_ 000 r O O O CL Q O U) N .0 2 H O 7> O rrLU J rr Q W a � N r - � O N � O M r M V N N N DD -0 07 w t O r M V O O n i O ca CO C X F N u! C15 J c6 O n h L = O W O O O M O O) W cV OD Cl) ''/^ V+ O Co 7 L I� •� f N U n z w a- 0 O w ac w LO LL O C) 0 0 W w w c) c=i> X w w a a H O N d r N z Ilt n 0Z:)�a N N 0_ 000 r O Z H O z �5; 0 rrLU J rr Q W a r — � o N � O M r M V N N N DD -0 07 w t O r M V O O n i O ca CO C X F N u! C15 J c6 O n h L = O W O O O M O O) W cV OD Cl) ''/^ V+ O Co 7 L I� •� f N U n z 0 LL - M N Q m W CIDN m It N W � LL- W w W O�, CC)M m O G m Lr t -- co co W N r O N N Q LIP a � M 1 z o� C w O Cl d Q w z U Q N x x z � � co LU N w � cn ~ � LLILL- � w N Q CL = � to I w 0- Z O Lu Lu z ULCQ cn w LL4 v o X Q CL O% C-) c9 z C) ';t m LU CD � Z✓, W C:) `y z o O CLWU CL P J vJDo QLu j LLI Lu — LL4 fw O w z Ow -� 4 (n `� W zCL o fY fY � >G z z w (n w Q w o CL Q c) < uQ ��- LU Z N Z m Q � z Q Q z� z z N Q w z O z N C'S W- Q)w o LLI w U m J U w � N z N Q o w� U z U — Q m Q- w � z 0 0 `V o �� m W �a 3 �' m w Lu I'D (ti � m N Q� Q'K L i 1 ------------ U z L.L �co U) w w C3 p "3 � = LU Q z N �_ z W z Y Q d LD C7 -L cn N W WLU LO fn Q z 0 0 0 o Q -i -i N p Q z z c�c p G X w�o CC �G = >¢ U] F- U Z < m LL cn p p } a lr W W rr p d °� p =�c G X Q z WO %>� ; !� /UCL /EL� % F-.' ' C7 U / Y W U CO z 0 LL - M N Q m W CIDN m It N W � LL- W w W O�, CC)M m O G m Lr t -- co co W N r O N N Q LIP a � M 1 L 0 W W W Llo p (D 0 O W W O W C) cn X W w a co a U) z d N In 0 N a � r o 0 0 a a U) a� v mQ w� �Q N � � Z_ W 1 -- LU (;) � X N W 3v Lu< Fnn T -� s_— O N O N M r M V N LO N N W w t O r M V O O n i O ca CO C X F O u! at J m O n N L = O W O O O M O 0) W O M V+ O O7 L I- • � 'I. U) U f, CDr� • 0 Zwv IL 1 rCL LU O% C-) c9 LU CD Z✓, C:) `y o P � W 0 � ---- W � w Q Q / `� ` � Lu Q N / I `V o 0\ Q� Q'K L i 1 ------------ LU LD I Q Cl - CL ---------LU---------- W CO Ni-_, X X; 57< LU '/ z CD w w � =' ------- �Qo CL GV N w Q ° w M �,_ W N r� w x � N z_--_______Q o _---______Q a ____________Q--______--Q_____________Q NW JNIN UVIJEHE 'DiSX3 w >W -N JNINHVIJEM S 9NUSIX3 0 O LU 7771,44 L 0 W W W Llo p (D 0 O W W O W C) cn X W w a co a U) z d N In 0 N a � r o 0 0 a a U) a� v mQ w� �Q N � � Z_ W 1 -- LU (;) � X N W 3v Lu< Fnn T -� s_— O N O N M r M V N LO N N W w t O r M V O O n i O ca CO C X F O u! at J m O n N L = O W O O O M O 0) W O M V+ O O7 L I- • � 'I. U) U f, CDr� • 0 LU I� 1 S9 _� O cm to Cl co M co 0 113, C) CLmQJo© Q F le, IL 0 0 CL 1391 0 z ; > CL Coe)Zv cfib oz E Cl) 0 r tZp pfY -�L:: a� LU S9 _� O cm to Cl co M co 0 113, C) CLmQJo© Q F le, IL 0 0 CL 1391 0 z ; > CL Coe)Zv cfib oz E Cl) 0 r tZp pfY -�L:: cz 0 C) 0 C') (D C)) 00 N 00 rz C4.< <,q �— r 1-- ") � 0 WN D ,,a 6 4 U) 6 De Lw (21 NU F w ww 1 f) 0- z W:2 Z. 0 m z < W Z < C) -Z x W w LL, w Cl) } U::i LU rn V - - ow") U) zo: 'L W �- 0 �[: z ca z (L �Wwzmu.< F, W 0- w VL (L f Dl X W J) w 'Wau Q 'doz C� Dffi 16 z U) 0 < NwQO Lu Ili (L w z < W < Z z 0,3 < w z -a: (f) li (3 j ILI O N LU LLImIlk Ilk qZ ��✓ Ilo-, J - „ ,s V - Al _ Q o LOCO Q U>� O Qn Z � U)U w W Q CL w Z \ U Q \ mILL- a O N w > � w nLU LO LL LU Lu oLLIU��0 LU �zo > w(a(D D �uwoQ - o z� go�� LLwLL- w(Y U` p awwU m w p n C) w _w LL w J LU w z m w az co w o 3� fY� Q�nw wz LU w Q Q p m U~ LU wUm U) qwL" O�z ZJ w�(K Q Q Q�co on > U g q U w q U C)wCoCL ww,wW- < <�- Ei zqu'�owLL- Lu aw �m?wQazU wgQn a[YQow Q�Q4 Qw�>Qw>ww�� w w a- > �c LL- LU 0wmu wi j�Q\�� p�w0Wpw�� O~ =n .�O Qz z Qz z-cn NLo m QvQL6Q Q z CD U W C) W U z W - L o J 7-- 11 W - z 0 a W J W LU U L o J -� Q II LU N G � 0 I N SO z 0 W a Q > z W U J Q W m W w )3� O Q W a H w W W m Q Z OL C)WWE <cv- O q Q m O Q w cn U 0)� LULL - CD n�UjN� iT q z�o QO O QmQwm LLI(Y N z n wm q Q cznOQ w z Qww �= w U (f)w O w � < w < n (Y Q Q v 0 zCL >O OQ>zm Z w O n z V w z m Nam �� zonQLxLIOL)7 z 0 ui LL- � (D Y v w _ q _ z ILLI LU wz OLO N >� u (D Z 3 vk5 z0z 0 -1 Q� �O Lo Co QO p mLU fT]� www NQ �� m Q 3 O (Y cY p w fY ` w V W w LLi CK q 3Q qw Uw LU C) :::) E: UQ n (N oqw UQ Q�w Qw �LLuu u � �a �a on no ° LLQ �w x- LQ> xo LLQ - Q �Z Q _ Z zQ -Q Lo pLLI z o� z la7 ( 4 67 v E u 'n - o r zLL �9 ac o LUn Q �n zz � W a� O)o U - w W J C) Q cz Q W OL o OL CD z z Q CL W _ LD o 6. W 2 z w Q J Q all - :::)o 0 x Q X � o ao O L om �w zQ w wo Fw >� Qw n �w z wQ�Q OL (j) :::) w/LL- 02 .L'-�=IYIV i v..L Suva-/ MZMP41=1 'NIW „0-19 J a x a w _ Q U U 2E 55 0- N ACL a2�0 N m U)2 0': 7 =O N d 00 r O c� a �a Q 3 U Q J W < CL O w CZ W I Q m xww Cn onQi q � V- z o�c <L = o C-/) T L� z LU C) U z O p QLz v 0 0C w cn C 7 N� Q z W N w CL z T w w - o m CD co M > I- M V LO N O N M 70 c; M O r M V O O i O N O GO n C x J CG O n <n = o W O O o M O O O) M co M U) p 0 iib-i1:1Y1 r N (D — ' o N N O M r M V N Ln N N DD 07 w t O r M V O O n i O ca CO C X F N U1 C15 J c6 O n h L = O W O O O M O O) W cV OD Cl) ''/^ V+ O O • � t U) U f, z w a- 0 O w ac w O Z cl o p 0 w w � w c) c=i> X w w a w O U) o H O z d N LO 0�a N N 0_ 000 r O O O O. Q C" O O 00 W N .0 c N z o Q � o 0 0 J LL z o LU 0 7 " LU cry — Q cin W o N (D — ' o N N O M r M V N Ln N N DD 07 w t O r M V O O n i O ca CO C X F N U1 C15 J c6 O n h L = O W O O O M O O) W cV OD Cl) ''/^ V+ O O • � t U) U f, IN N N z LU a O IL w m O � o O 0 Lu w o w U Q J U) g�F U) CL Lou w w Z w o O O LO cwi)zaw N O 0 O 3: ~ N N d SO r O C O O CL a O V �00 V WA 0 00 LL 00 LO Cfl 0 N 0 z J 0 0 O N J LL LO N - cn O o U n C=141 M N z w a- 0 O w w w O cl o p 0 w w � w C) Q c=i> goIC) � X w w a a H N z d O N LO O a N N CL 000 r O O 0 CL U) LU a Q m Q z w `L- `L 0 0� opt - o LO LOC() w Q LU Q LU Q > J m LLL L Q LL O ^�C� J Q z (f) (S) (f) Wz z 0 0 0 N 0 c0 LU J M O o C) OO O __j o o o ~ QM w w w m m p CL N [r CJ WA 0 00 LL 00 LO Cfl 0 N 0 z J 0 0 O N J LL LO N - cn O o U n C=141 M N z w a- 0 O w w w O cl o p 0 w w � w C) Q c=i> goIC) � X w w a a H N z d O N LO O a N N CL 000 r O O 0 CL U) / WA O DD LL N 0 z Q 0 0 O N O CD o LL 2 n m o i N z w a- 0 O w ac w O C, o p 0 w w � w W (1) c=i> a- X w w a a H O N z d r N LO 0 a N N 0_ 000 r O O O O. Q O U) N .0 — ' o N � O M r M V N N N DD -0 07 w t O r M V O O n i O ca CO C X F N U1 C15 J c6 O n h L = O W O O O M O O) W cV OD Cl) ''/^ V+ O7 L I- • � t U) U f, CDr� • N� w w I w o p LL O p m O p N 0 Lo O - I= z O I O 1 O O I O 1 O O o CO w -AC� I -1 -j _j I 1 LLL I co 7;4- >L m z- IL lawCC) w >L L w r O s s s Io s m s cv 6 6 o Q Q W - Q + + � + + s + v + m + + O I CO 0 00 z 0 Q LU J o � W U W CL O cel CL C -_ Q � o W 1 2 � u DC - O N m z o o p N \ N O O m 0 0 0 0 Lo O - - z OI O 1 O O 1 O 1 O O w LL- m z- IL LL- CC) w >L C, w tr O s s s io s m s cv 6 6 o Q=� Q C� - Q + + \D + � + + v + m +c i + O I CQ N z w a- 0 O w ac w LO LL O C) 0 0 W w w LU U) U) n X w w a a H O N z d r N �n 0�a N N 0_ 000 r O O O O Q O U) N .0 0 00 0 z _o H CD a > W N I W H W � u m C:) Q U Z 1`1--I p O LLI O CQ JW U w LU z � o ij � Q -I < iz _ Q w W� w ��>z �z CV Q Q z w U 0 k-) CL w Cl w O CO O CLQ K :::)--1 v Cv-tnwwwU�QQw:K< U moLU -- Q Q)� Q 0 �I n CLQ Z Cfi U wM�0) - - -w LLA F- < CaUC� wwT:TTK �oQU�LLI -1LUw ow e-j-A� w-1 LU Q w m Q � C) LLI C) Q �L �L � < (f) :z � Lail � �z�C�(�CQQQQQUILLLI w O E co �C �C CQ C4 Co LLI (0C� QE: � O z mLD \&>`co (T w - ' o M r M V LO N W _ w t O r M V O O n CD ca t- c x F (n C15 J m O n a �r U) = o W O O O co O O) W OD T + U M U p Co :5 t I- •� f N U n C). p O C O m O� O O N O Ise O - - z O O O O O O O O CO w J I I J I J I J I - I W I Lo -:;T>L m z_ IL w o w >L O w r- p�Q s L S M S cv 6 6 o Q= (Li Q + z + � + + s + v + m + cy + O I CO 0 0 0 z 0 H a > CD W I W H W _ I o � u OC - O N - m z o W N z w a- 0 O w ac w O cl o p 0 w w � w c) Q c=i> X w w a a H O N d r N z Ilt n 0Z:)�a N N 0_ 000 r O O O O Q O U) N .0 0 0 z 0 W J W o z W W CJ N W W C/ - W 2 � u C/) m N V_ (� w C) V z w p OU � ULLI 0 � � � J O CE) -1C)LLI V w W z:::) Q oQ z �ED�Q w ALL w > z W LLI Q CL Z -A J U CD OL O CLi Nz C� in w Ld LLI � U z z z (Y/O �\ _ cz wO�0C)C) QLIOL�i n(L�zcn��CU Q Q wwww0000LLI:K �::J- CaU(Y � z u w -A f - U QVQwzzoQ�� z �cz W cnQQQQUILw0CzU O ry co "C "t co CE) CE) CLQ Q O CLQ O o LNm lr IO z ml �c�i�rc»rco� w - = o M r M V LO N W _ w t O r M V O O n CD ca c x F ur C15 J m O n N L = O c •'_�-r W O O O co O O) W OD M ''/^ V+ Co 7 L I- •� f N U n F Cr) z w� �: Coe) o X N LU CD z Q CL Q LU 75 U Q Q W 5 W a U W CL CJ) O CL W U j 0 cL W H C/) U O LU cn O CL= o CL CL 0 �L m LL QR) C) - + Q LU LL- cn Q o w + (Y- + + 0 0 00 0 z o 0 U LU C/) o 0 X LU O m - C-) N ti N z w a- 0 O w ac w LO LL O C) 0 0 W w w c) c=i> X w w a a H O N d r N z Ilt n 0Z:)�a N N 0- 000 r O O O O Q_ U) — = o M N � O r M V N N N W -0 07 w t O r M v O n CD ca c x F Ur ca J c6 O n h L = O O O O M O O) W cV M Cl) ''/^ V+ O7 L n •� t U) U n 3NOig3Wll 432 ITIS MOC ?1 iN,f7d NI -1' 3�)N lllM 437 �l'd �101?1H z 1�3r -131N17 73 43SOdX3 >13 „l 103r0�1d D 3NOlS3Wl� a3� „l �IOI�H SS3 l31N17 73 43SOdX3 XI „l 103r0�1d 3MiG3Wl-I al� 'STN MlA iivi 0 NOUVA313 „l �I01?1H SS3�= �131N1� X33_ 43SOdX3 �Od „l 1S3r0�1d d� 3NOiGIMI G'gzl 1101 199 +1, 00 N z LU a O a - LU rf- w m O LL 0 0 0 LU w o w U Q J U) go,F U) a x a w OU-) CL m O LO U) CL N O ¢ O 3: ~ N N aaor� o w T — = o m � co M > M V � N O N 00 70 C7 W t O T M V O O i O N O GO N C X J (G O n � - r W O o o M O O m CO (6 Village of Mount Prospect M""°"v`�, Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, AICP, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JANUARY 22, 2021 SUBJECT: PROSPECT PLACE REDEVELOPMENT UPDATE Background This memorandum provides an overview of the changes made by First Equity Group (the Petitioner) to address concerns that were raised at the January 14`" public hearing for the Prospect Place proposal. Parking To better satisfy the Village's parking requirements, the Petitioner altered the floor plans of the building by converting eight 2 -bedroom units into 1 -bedroom units so that the unit mix is now an even split of one and two-bedroom units (40:40). They also added 13 underground parking stalls by installing eleven tandem spaces and restriping the remaining spaces. The Petitioner's initial submittal required 104 parking stalls for the residential component of the project but now requires 100 parking stalls to meet Village Code. The project now provides 94 on-site parking spaces and has a parking ratio of 1.18 parking stalls per unit. The Petitioner is still seeking an agreement to lease additional parking stalls in the Wille Street parking lot to meet code requirements and increase the amount of parking provided for its residents. The following table demonstrates how the proposal's parking compares to parking provided for other downtown apartment projects. Table 1: Downtown Apartment Parking Development Stalls Required Stalls Provided Final Ratio 20 West 96 78 1.07 Maple Street Lofts 282 310 1.21 10 N Main Street 115 130 1.34 Prospect Place 100 94 1.18 Traffic The Petitioner also provided the attached memorandum by Michael Werthmann, PE, PTOE of Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA), which provides a more detailed review of the potential impact that the proposed Prospect Place Development would have on Wille Street south of Evergreen Avenue if approved. KLOA will be present at the January 28th public hearing to answer any questions related to this project's traffic impact. 29 Prospect Place Redevelopment January 22, 2021 Page 2 Exhibit A — Redevelopment Plans 30 Prospect Place Redevelopment January 22, 2021 Page 3 Exhibit A — Redevelopment Plans Continued 31 Prospect Place Redevelopment January 22, 2021 Page 4 Exhibit A — Redevelopment Plans Continued 32 Prospect Place Redevelopment January 22, 2021 Page 5 Exhibit A — Redevelopment Plans Continued 33 w w, CM E, � r,. � f Uji Al CM Uj `� �I � Eli i c lkb r„iF of `uW � Ira 0 ,. 33 w w, � r,. � f Y 11”c `� Eli i c Ira w Ne w Uj 33 Prospect Place Redevelopment January 22, 2021 Page 6 Exhibit A — Redevelopment Plans Continued 9 I 0 34 Prospect Place Redevelopment January 22, 2021 Page 7 Exhibit A — Redevelopment Plans Continued 35 LL� < LU wxxxxaxi LIJ 77) LU C:) 0 0 L.L L.0 LU LU Cn CL C�,4 35 Prospect Place Redevelopment January 22, 2021 Page 8 Exhibit A Continued 36 Prospect Place Redevelopment January 22, 2021 Page 9 Exhibit A — Redevelopment Plans Continued 4" BLACK MET COPi BLACK EXPOS STEEL LINI BLACK EXPOS STEEL COW BLACK FRAMED CLE GLASS HINDO 13LACK EXF05 FASTEN I � I MAw WININ � in � W-11 114' - 1'4' / 5' 10, ) LIMESTONE ROJEC,T �" EYPOSED LI NTEL, s E3F,er-K 1" K UPOSED L LINTEL 55 BRICK K EXPOSED L LINTEL ECT 2 BRICK 5155 r' �R LED NALL CE r—IN PLANTER ON SILL ED LIMESTONE 37 ' Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone: (847) 818-5328 Zoning Request Application Official Use Only (To be completed by Village Staff) Case Number: P&Z - - Date of Submission: Hearing Date: Project Name/Address: Prospect Place I. Subject Property Address(es): 1-11, 15-27 West Prospect Avenue Zoning District (s): B-5 Property Area (Sq.Ft. and/or Acreage): 35,769sf Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN(s): 08-12-114-001-0000. 002. 003.004, 005 II. Zoning Request(s) (Check all that apply) ❑ Conditional Use: For ❑ Variation(s): To ❑ Zoning Map Amendment: Rezone From To ❑ Zoning Text Amendment: Section(s) R1 Other: Planned Unit Development (PUD) III. Summary of Proposal (use separate sheet if necessary) Please see attached. IV. Applicant (all correspondence will be sent to the applicant) Name: prospect Place Development Partners, LLC Corporation: Address: 3901 25th Avenue City, State, ZIP Code: Schiller Park, Illinois 60176 Phone: (773) 202-9819 Email: tom@firstequity.realestate Interest in Property: Contract Purchaser / Developer (e.g. owner, buyer, developer, lessee, architect, etc... ) 1 38 V,l,,,,, Prbpert 0 W .............. .. Check if Same as Applicant Name: Prospect Place, LI,C Corporation - Address: c/o Kevin Cahill, ES,Qion. North Wacke r, Drive, Some 611 City,, State, ZIP, Code.: Chicago) 1111nol's 60606 Phone-. (312),641-6105, 1 Email': ca I hillaw@aolcom I hereby aff irm that; all Information provided herlFlu in and in all m(aterials submitted in associat'llon with this, application are true iand jac, urate t the best jof my knowledge. 12-1 0�20,20 Applicant. Date. (Sig Tom Lowe (Print orType Name) '1v lily'l 11 1, u3sm N 39 STATE OF ILLINOIS )l I U under oath, state that I am ,(print name) (property address and, PIN)c 2 IV4� (561Ne. ... .. me thi 40 PROSPECT PLACE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, Lr,c 6. December 10, 2020 Mr. Jason Shallcross VILLAGE of MOUNT PROSPECT 50 South Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 RE: PROSPECT PLACE SWC Main and Prospect Avenue Mount Prospect, Illinois Dear Jason, Enclosed, please find a copy of the Zoning Request Application and supporting site-specific information regarding the proposed redevelopment of Prospect Place located at 1-11 and 15-27 West Prospect Avenue, at the southwest corner of Main Street and Prospect Avenue in downtown Mount Prospect. This application is submitted on behalf of Prospect Place Development Partners, LLC, the applicant for the project. PROPOSAL The development proposal is for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) allowing the construction of a five -story 80 -unit mixed-use retail and multifamily residential apartment building with ground floor and rooftop amenities, 81 on-site parking stalls, landscaping, site lighting, and streetscape improvements on and adjacent to the property located at 1-11 and 15-27 West Prospect Avenue, at the southwest corner of Main and Prospect Avenue. The property is currently zoned B5 Central Commercial. The retail storefronts containing approximately 10,234 square feet are located on the ground floor along the Prospect Avenue frontage. The residential entrance/lobby will have access to both Prospect Avenue as well as in the rear of the building, with a designated resident pick-up/drop-off area provided near the rear entrance. The unit mix for the project currently anticipates thirty-two (32) 1 -bedroom units and forty-eight (48) 2 -bedroom units, with all residential units occupying floors two thru five. Resident amenities proposed for Prospect Place include an amenity lounge, fitness center, mail/package room, bicycle storage room, and an interior dog wash. A rooftop amenity lounge and outdoor sun deck, including a partial green roof, is also being proposed. On-site parking is provided via fifty-nine (59) lower -level parking stalls (below the building footprint) and twenty-two (22) surface parking stalls located in the rear of the building. Our application includes a request for the Village to allow/issue resident parking permits on the Municipal Parking Lot located across Wille Street from Prospect Place. The terms pertaining to the Village's issuance of the resident parking permits will be defined and included in the Redevelopment Agreement. The proposal also includes improvements within the Village rights-of-way to reconfigure and add additional street 3901 25th Avenue Schiller Park, Illinois 60176 (773) 202-9819 Telephone (708) 843-0507 Facsimile 41 Mr. Jason Shallcross Prospect Place, Mount Prospect December 10, 2020 — Page 2 parking on Prospect Avenue, Wille, and Evergreen for public benefit and for use by all retail along Prospect Avenue, west of Main Street. The proposed architecture for the structure, designed by Jonathan Split Architects Ltd. of Chicago, consists of masonry construction for the entire building, with large format windows in the residential units. The brick colors will be complementary to each other and will complement other existing, established structures in downtown Mount Prospect. Each unit will contain a recessed balcony, with the exterior design allowing some of the balconies to be covered. The retail storefronts will be located against the Prospect Avenue right-of-way, adjacent to the sidewalk, as the existing structure does today. The 10,234sf of retail is anticipated to be occupied by restaurant(s) and traditional service retail establishments. Operable windows are proposed for the two endcaps of the structure, which have the probability of being occupied by a restaurant, so that windows can open, allowing open-air dining opportunities. Outdoor dining areas are also being defined adjacent to the proposed building near the endcaps. The height to the roof of the building is just over sixty-four feet (64'), excluding any rooftop structures such as stairway/elevator lobby and rooftop amenity structure. Civil engineering design, prepared by Webster, McGrath, & Ahlberg of Wheaton, addresses utility services (domestic water, fire protection, sanitary sewer) to the Prospect Place, and accounts for on-site stormwater volume control. PROJECT SCHEDULE The project development schedule anticipates a Mount Prospect Planning and Zoning Commission hearing in January 2021 with a recommendation going before the Village Board as early as February 2021. Provided approval for the project is granted, application for permits will be staged and sequential with a demolition permit initially being applied for, a foundation permit application following, before full building permits are issued. Assuming the project is approved, estimated milestone dates include demolition of the existing improvements late Spring 2021, commencement of construction in Summer 2021, and project completion in the Fall of 2022. A fifteen - month construction schedule could accommodate occupancy at the end of 2022. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION In addition to the enclosed application, which consists of Jonathan Split Architects plans and Webster, McGrath, & Ahlberg engineering plans, we have provided supplemental information including a landscape plan and Traffic Impact Study. 3901 25th Avenue Schiller Park, Illinois 60176 (773) 202-9819 Telephone (708) 843-0507 Facsimile 42 Mr. Jason Shallcross Prospect Place, Mount Prospect December 10, 2020 — Page 3 Thank you for your assistance, Jason. We are available to discuss any aspect of the enclosed information and we look forward to working with you on this project. If you need additional information to process the request, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, PROSPECT PLACE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC c/o FIRST EQUITY GROUP, LLC Thomas Lowe w/enol. cc: Bart Przjemski, Noah Properties Michael Musa, EPI 3901 25th Avenue Schiller Park, Illinois 60176 (773) 202-9819 Telephone (708) 843-0507 Facsimile 43 Mr. Jason Shallcross Prospect Place, Mount Prospect December 10, 2020 — Page 8 ZONING REQUEST APPLICATION —STANDARDS Conditional Use - No conditional use shall be recommended for approval by the planning and zoning commission unless it finds: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; RESPONSE: The proposed development will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The project proposal is to develop an appropriately scaled mixed-use retail and multifamily residential apartment building in downtown Mount Prospect where similar uses exist. The proposed use is compatible with adjoining properties. 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located; RESPONSE: The proposed development will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed mixed-use multifamily residential apartment building, with ground floor retail, is a compatible use and the retail component is consistent with other properties along Prospect Avenue east and west of Main Street. The property is currently zoned B5 Central Commercial and is occupied by approximately 18,800sf of retail (with vacancies). The significant investment in the site and building will enhance the property's value and will be an improvement to an otherwise partially vacant, underutilized, and unsightly property. 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; RESPONSE: The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in the district since the property is a redevelopment of an existing commercial property, with all surrounding properties already developed. The proposed development will not affect or impact any adjoining property that anticipates future redevelopment. 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; RESPONSE: The proposed development utilizes existing public utilities, roads, and drainage systems or will install new improvements to accommodate the project demand, as required. Preliminary engineering and architectural improvement plans depicting existing and proposed improvements accompany this application. 3901 25th Avenue Schiller Park, Illinois 60176 (773) 202-9819 Telephone (708) 843-0507 Facsimile 44 Mr. Jason Shallcross Prospect Place, Mount Prospect December 10, 2020 — Page 9 S. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; RESPONSE: The application includes engineering plans designed by Webster, McGrath, and Ahlberg, and KLOA, that ensure adequate measures are being taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion on and around the public rights-of-way. Access will be provided via a new access on Evergreen Avenue and a new access along Wille, both located as far away from the intersection of Evergreen and Wille as possible. Existing access along Prospect Avenue is being eliminated altogether. 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village; RESPONSE: The Village of Mount Prospect Comprehensive Plan adopted November 2017 identifies Downtown Redevelopment and Downtown Residential Density as Opportunities, and Limited Rentals Downtown as a Weakness according to the Village's SWOT analysis that was conducted. This proposal supports the Opportunity and reduces a Weakness identified in the SWOT. Other policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan suggest there is support for infill development or redevelopment of underutilized properties, which is exactly what the proposal accomplishes. The proposal also supports other policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan which encourage Transit Oriented Developments and emphasizes the continued revitalization of downtown Mount Prospect. This proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. RESPONSE: Provided a conditional use is approved and granted, the use shall conform to the applicable regulations of the B5 Central Commercial district in which it is located. The proposed Planned Unit Development sets forth the design and layout of the site and building improvements and no deviation to the plan will occur without the review and approval of the Village staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3901 25th Avenue Schiller Park, Illinois 60176 (773) 202-9819 Telephone (708) 843-0507 Facsimile 45 LECrEND: UNE STORM E cas _ NE GAS UNE — BRICK PAVEMENT — CDNCRETE PAVEIAEM B/C R.0... — RICHT OF WAY =14 _UNKEFENCE — WOOD PENCE �i� — ARTY FIXE W/VlIREB G -WNL LK:xr yc - -G PNM MARK (RED) y - WATER PANT MARK (BLUE) yc - GAS PAINT MARK (YELLOW) lc _ CDMM PNxr MUK I—IE) MNrK (GNTxN) ® - CONCRETE PARING BUMPER r} - WNL 11GTR/SPOT IGTR T - STREET SON P.G.B. - POINT OF BEGINNING - POINT OF COMMEN£MEM ® - BIADST FAN D.C. - DE- PRESSED CURB O - UNIOENRFED MANHOLE SEWER MAN. ee® - ©„ � -WATER M4NHIXE - COMM. NANHOTE Of �E -MAN MONIIJIE W - C,s vuvE W - WATER VANE - PRE HYDRANT - CENTER UNE - TREE w/DAAEIER Q- PARKING STNL COUNT -IRET COMM. - (IEUPMUXONL NRRNET. ETC.) A/C AR CONCIRONING UNIT - T/FN0. - TCP OF FOUNDATON < - EVWCAEEN TREE w/DNMETER o-�(- - SR1ET LIGHT - HANDICWPEO SPACE - —C UDM MGA - METAL GUARD FI -00D CERTIFIGOON: (PER FEMA WEBSNEI THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE IS bEH IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA FIDODWAY MAPPED: NQ, FIAODWAY ON PROPERTY: EQ, MAP USED: RATE MAP, COMMUNITY NAME: MT. PROSPECT. NUPGE OF COMMUNITY NO.: 1ZQ128, COMMUNITY PANEL: MO. MAP NUMBER: 1Z031CO20B J, EFFECTNE DATE AUGUST 19. 2000, FLOOD ZONE X, BASE ODE—ON FROM FIRM (30.5Fp: NCA NAVD 1988. ALL DI MONS ARE SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF. Order No. ------ 91030 ------------- Scale: 1 inch= -----16 -----FEET Field Completion Date:— 24 AUGUST 2018- ------ — Ordered b CAHILL LAW OFFICES MM SURVEYING CO., INC. PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM No. 184-003233 ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey LOTS 8, 9,10 AND Il INBUSSE'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 TO 6, INCLUSIVE INOLOCK4,AL.SO OF LOTS 2 AND3IN BLOCK 5, ALL OF BLOCK 6,LOT913 TO 24, INCLUSIVE INBLOCK AND LO'1317TO20INBLOCK8, ALL IN MEIER'S ADDITION TO MOUNT PROSPECT, A SUBE9IV18ION IN TBH NORTHWEST Ye OF SECTION 12, TOWNSFBP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE TIIBD P EPAL MERm[AN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS; ALSO, LOT 1 (EXCEPT THE NORTHEASTERLY 16 FEET THEREOF) IN BLOCK 5 DEDICATED TO FORM PART OF PROSPECT AVENUE BY PLAT REGISTERED AS DOCOMENY MINIB1I, 301948 IN METER'S AMMON TO MOUNT PROSPECT, IN THE NORTHWEST Y OF SECTION 12, 1'OWNBE1841 NORTH, RANGE Ll, EAST OF TEE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COONTY, ILLINOIS COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 1-31 PR(16PHGT AVENTJH (COVE PLAZAS Mi. PROSPHCi, b. RIA. �iL114-0O1-0000, OB-1L114-0OLO(g0, �1L114-W3-000D, �IL114-009-0000 & W -12 -114 -005 -DOW TOTAL LAND AREA= 35,769.q. R = 0.821 ecce, mole or lees TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRIJT=19,423 K. 8. FFEMS FROMTABLE "A': _ 'NEM #9: THERE WERE 28 LINED PARKING SPACES AND 1 HANDICAP SPACE TME CQ1E6Rf3ffiNTPROPR)EfTBPyT$(7'1 O TIME INSURANCE COMPANY FOUND WITHIN THE SURrE1'ED PROPERTY. PRBN[AffiiR .1409Sfj136I06giVC 'NEM #14: THE SURVEYED PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF EPPLu7TFQD SR 05,2012 W. PROSPECT AVE., W. EVERGREEN AVE. PITO S. WILIE BT.. _ ............._—__..........._—__........ 'NEM #16: THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECENT EARTH MOVING WORK, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. OR BUILDING ADDITIONS OBSERVED IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTNIG THE NELDWORK. 'NBA #21: THE CLIENT AND TIE SURVEYOR AGREED ON THE TERAS OF SHOWING ONLY VISIBLE ABOVE -GROUND URATES ON THE PIAT OF SURVIY. i e�.... , %V II II�gy ,rl.Ciri s Ro, (1, S ite z`II0 R c»r��o, o s ��.� � 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Tom Lowe y 18, zl5 8 9 9 9 0 5II 8" Q 8 First Equity Group FROM: Luay Aboona, PE, PTOE Principal Michael A. Werthmann, PE, PTOE Principal DATE: January 21, 2021 SUBJECT: Impact on Wille Street South of Evergreen Avenue Prospect Place Mixed -Use Development Mount Prospect, Illinois This memorandum report summarizes the impact of the proposed Prospect Place mixed-use development on Wille Street south of Evergreen Avenue. Based on the following, it is anticipated that the proposed development will have a limited impact on the operation of Wille Street south of Evergreen Avenue: The proposed mixed-use development is projected to generate a relatively low volume of total traffic. This is due in part due to the location of the site in the downtown area and its proximity to the downtown commercial uses and amenities and the public transportation serving the downtown area. The proposed mixed-use development will be replacing an existing 18,800 square -foot commercial development that is currently generating traffic. As such, the traffic generated by the proposed development will not be all new traffic to the roadway system. Given the grid system serving the downtown area, access to the site is provided via a number of routes. As such, only a portion of the development -generated traffic is projected to traverse Wille Street south of Evergreen Avenue, further reducing the volume of development - generated traffic projected to use Wille Street. Previous residential intersection traffic control studies conducted by KLOA, Inc. for the Village of Mount Prospect show that Wille Street south of Evergreen Avenue had a daily, two- way traffic volume of less than 500 vehicles. According to Residential Streets', local residential roads typically have a daily volume between 400 and 1,500 vehicles. As such, the daily traffic volume on Wille Street south of Evergreen Avenue is at the lower end of the traffic volume range for local residential roads and is lower than the daily traffic volumes on many local residential roads in Mount Prospect. Wille Street is currently operating well below the carrying capacity of a two-lane local road. As such, it has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the limited additional traffic that may be generated by the proposed mixed-use development. 1 Residential Streets, Third Edition, 2001 was developed by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and the Urban Land Institute (ULI) 47 irst Equl' ty Group, LLC 48 This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for Prospect Place, a proposed residential development to be located at 1 W Prospect Avenue in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The site, which is occupied by a retail building and a parking lot, is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Main Street with Prospect Avenue. As proposed, the site will be redeveloped to provide afive-story building containing approximately 80 apartment units (48 two-bedroom units and 32 one -bedroom units), an approximate 10,234 square feet of ground floor retail, a 59 - space parking garage and 22 -space surface parking lot. Access to the parking will be provided off Evergreen Avenue and Wille Street. Access to loading will be provided off Wille Street. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site. The sections of this report present the following: Existing roadway conditions A description of the proposed development Directional distribution of the development traffic Vehicle trip generation for the development Future traffic conditions including access to the development Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system Evaluation of the adequacy of the parking supply Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the following conditions: 1. Existing Conditions -Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. 2. Background Conditions -Analyzes the capacity of the future roadway system using the traffic volumes that include the existing traffic volumes, the ambient area growth not attributable to any particular development, and the traffic to be generated by The Lofts mixed-use development (which is under construction) located at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maple Street with Prospect Avenue, the existing 97 -unit apartment building located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Main Street and Central Road, and the 73 -unit apartment building (which is under construction) located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Northwest Highway with Main Street. 3. Projected Conditions — Analyzes the capacity of the future roadway system using the traffic volumes that include the background traffic volume, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development. 49 fV f"J rb "s del U EE C) 'J 0 1"d g g (I 2 Q) ,a) (uuq'°-'j p"P rP r c: va yddfor J MUNN U I� P � 'M yy I .N7 ufl . t P, m 1 CO 4 f7l At] Ell) CL lilm j li'w 1,.4 rt r X71, f ""S/ D miss � CIO f""' vrcflNl,'�xn `5V M im, L b En S Uj"o t 29 """J" UJ " ul rev Z,, CC Pi CI C. "L, _fm 09 � ) (J Tri "M f"j ',E QJ E 'n v"pp �'Rdo --------------------------------- -------------------------------- CD 4'U YJ 'f'10 S D 40 '!'4' LA GJ E 1h, "JIM, - ------ 1 VJ A, v J CU a"I Z3 A f," M," r; ,,i h dA A 1-5 A, u.A fV f"J rb "s del U EE C) 'J 0 a w V.� I ' ,a) a w V.� I ' Aerial View of Site Figure 2 d Residenticil L )evvIopazent AORS N% A"h),1111t,pt Hs 3 51 The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices, and existing peak hour traffic volumes. The site, which was occupied by a retail use and its parking lot, is bounded by Main Street to the east, Prospect Avenue to the north, Evergreen Avenue to the south, and Wille Street to the west. In addition, the site is located approximately 225 feet southwest of the Mount Prospect Station for the Union Pacific North-West (UP -NW) Metra Commuter Railway. The characteristics of the existing roadways near the proposed development are described below and illustrated in Figure 3. Main Sheet (ILL Route 83) is a north -south, other principal arterial that generally provides two lanes in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its signalized intersection with Northwest Highway, Main Street provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane and a combined through/right-turn lane on both approaches. A high -visibility crosswalk is provided on the north leg of this intersection and a standard style crosswalk is provided on the south leg of this intersection. At its signalized intersection with Prospect Avenue and Evergreen Avenue, Main Street provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane and a combined through/right-turn lane on both approaches. A high -visibility crosswalk is provided on the south leg of this intersection. Main Street is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation, is designated as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA) and carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume of approximately 13,800 vehicles north of Northwest Highway and 15,400 vehicles south of Northwest Highway (IDOT 2019). In addition, Main Street has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Northwest Highway (US 14) is a northwest -southeast, minor arterial that generally provides two lanes in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its signalized intersection with Main Street, Northwest Highway provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane and a combined through/right-turn lane on both approaches. Standard -style crosswalks are provided on the east and west legs of this intersection. Northwest Highway is under the jurisdiction of IDOT and carries an AADT volume of 9,900 vehicles west of Main Street and 10,300 vehicles east of Main Street (IDOT 2019). 52 ;:t < 0 LLJ o -i La- -� -A- -A- :i (D (D m m . .. ... .. .. 61 (D L C: LL 0 0 0 0 0') O C'4 C%4 CN .s 0 -4 z Q) 0 v ---j (1) C) A --j C/) A—a M -r- C) ca 70 cu 0 U) x LU M LO Prospect Avenue is a northwest -southeast, local road that generally provides one lane in each direction separated by a landscaped median in the vicinity of the site. At its signalized intersection with main Street, Prospect Avenue provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane and a combined through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach. The westbound approach provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane and an exclusive right -turn lane. Standard -style crosswalks are provided on the east and west legs of this intersection. At its unsignalized intersection with Wille Street, Prospect Avenue provides a combined through/right-turn lane on the eastbound approach and a combined through/left-turn lane on the westbound approach. Two- hour parking is permitted from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on the south side of the road west of Main Street and on both sides of the road east of Main Street, and four-hour parking is permitted from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on the north side of the road west of Main Street. Prospect Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect, and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Evergreen Avenue is an east -west local road that generally provides one lane in each direction separated by a landscaped median in the vicinity of the site. At its intersection with Main Street, Evergreen Avenue provides an exclusive right -turn lane on the eastbound approach under stop sign control. A standard style crosswalk is provided at the west leg of this intersection. At its unsignalized intersection with Wille Street, Evergreen Avenue provides a combined left/through/right-turn lane on both approaches. Two-hour parking is permitted from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on the south side of the road east of Wille Street and on both sides of the road west of Wille Street, and four-hour parking is permitted from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on the north side of the road east of Wille Street. Evergreen Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect. Wille Street is a north -south local rod that generally provides one lane in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its unsignalized intersection with Prospect Avenue, Wille Street provides a combined left/right-turn lane on the northbound approach under stop sign control. A standard style crosswalk is provided on the south leg of this intersection. At its unsignalized intersection with Evergreen Avenue, Wille Street provides a combined left/through/right-turn lane on both approaches under stop sign control. Two-hour parking is permitted from 7:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. on both sides of the road between Prospect Avenue and Evergreen Avenue. Wille Street is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect. rr pnzenl 54 .. rospect..Down.town. I 'ranspottatlon. Study The Village of Mount Prospect commissioned a transportation study of the downtown area in 2018, the results of which are summarized in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study prepared by Sam Schwartz Consulting dated October 15, 2018. In this study, it was identified that congestion of traffic within the downtown area was primarily attributed to the at grade rail crossings at IL Route 83 and Emerson Street which are regularly blocked by Metra commuter trains during the peak periods. When an inbound or outbound train is at the Mount Prospect Station, crossing gates are down at both intersections. This study also identified several area improvements to significantly improve the operations of the downtown area. These improvements ranged from short term improvements such as updating pedestrian facilities/signal equipment to long term infrastructure improvements such as new railroad crossings and relocation of the train station and platforms. Some of the short-term improvements included the following: Installation of Directional Pedestrian Push Buttons at Signalized Intersections Coordination with Metra Train Engineers 77 �. '0'HOW 'N Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, traffic volumes in the study area do not reflect normal or typical conditions. As such, in order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. utilized previous peak period traffic counts conducted in 2018 at the following intersections: Main Street with Northwest Highway Main Street with Prospect Avenue These counts were adjusted to reflect 2020 traffic conditions by applying a regional growth factor determined based on traffic projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) as discussed later in the report. Additional counts were conducted by KLOA, Inc. using Miovision Video Scout Collection Units on Thursday, November 5, 2020 during the weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and weekday evening (4:00 to 6:00 P.M.) peals periods at the following intersections: Main Street with Prospect Avenue and Evergreen Avenue Main Street with Evergreen Avenue Evergreen Avenue with Wille Street Evergreen Avenue with Wille Street The counts at the intersection of Main Street with Prospect Avenue conducted in 2018 were 60 percent higher during the weekday morning peak hour and 20 percent higher during the weekday evening peak hour than those conducted in 2020. Therefore, the 2020 traffic counts were increased by 60 percent during the weekday morning peak hour and by 20 percent during the weekday evening peak hour. „sly tits fllitul)i Is, 7 0A'N%"%k 55 Based on the turning movement count data, it was determined that the weekday morning peak hour generally occurs between 7:15 and 8:15 A.M., the weekday evening peak hour generally occurs between 5:00 and 6:00 P.M. These two respective peak hours will be used for the traffic capacity analyses presented later in this report. Figure 4 shows the adjusted Year 2020 peak hour traffic volumes. Located between Prospect Avenue and Northwest Highway is the at -grade railroad crossing on Main Street with the Union Pacific railroad tracks. As previously indicated, the site is located approximately 225 feet southwest of the Mount Prospect Station for the Union Pacific North-West (UP -NW) Metra Commuter Railway and has a 150 -foot walking distance from the front of the building to the inbound (eastbound) train platform. The Metra UP -NW Railway Line runs from Harvard to Chicago, Illinois and carries a total (inbound and outbound) of 65 passenger trains daily on weekdays, 24 on Saturdays, and 15 on Sundays during typical commuter activities. Field observations have shown that a high number of commuter trains are crossing Main Street during the peak hours, as well as emergency vehicles. It should be noted that, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, an alternate schedule (effective since November 2nd, 2020) is temporarily in effect, and indicates that approximately one inbound train and one outbound train are crossing Main Street during the weekday morning peak hour, and approximately one inbound train and three outbound trains are crossing Main Street during the weekday evening peak hour. In addition, the railroad gates on IL 83 remain down while Metra passengers board and alight the train, increasing traffic delays and decreasing the efficiency of the three interconnected signals along Main Street. 56 O z w D z w Q I WILLE 'TREET N L U C C LL 0 0 Q �i 2 O O N N C i O N k*4 -0 ..s O J Z Q) O S/- ---j cn w E _=3 O U CU L cn 'X W O N O N cu a� O c C= ._ a) — E 0 CD > o cn o �p � O L n LO �'� h p'� �, 5 (5) 00► 61 (30) � °' h � 502 (537) 5 f10) � 446 (527) 0 (2) AIN 56 (61) M 15 (25) 56 1 482 (517) 503 (539) 46 (42) 5 (5) 25 (51 .- 0, Pyo 1 � 4 v �Q. JQ e� ti _C> Ln o L 21 fll) `V tO 10 fll) 2 (5) 2 (0) 1' o (o) 2 (5) 2 (5) w D z w Q I WILLE 'TREET N L U C C LL 0 0 Q �i 2 O O N N C i O N k*4 -0 ..s O J Z Q) O S/- ---j cn w E _=3 O U CU L cn 'X W O N O N cu a� O c C= ._ a) — E 0 CD > o cn o �p � O L n LO In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Site +r Development Plan As proposed, the site will be redeveloped to provide a five -story building containing approximately 80 apartment units (48 two-bedroom units and 32 one -bedroom units), an approximate 10,234 square feet of ground floor retail, a 59 -space parking garage and 22 -space surface parking lot for a total of 81 spaces. In addition, it is our understanding that the site will have access to the approximate 49 -space parking lot located on the west side of Wille Street. Access to the parking will be provided off Evergreen Avenue and Wille Street. Access to loading will be provided off Wille Street. It should be noted that the west end of the remaining median along Evergreen Avenue (between the proposed access drive and Main Street) will be modified to allow left -turn outbound movements from the proposed driveway onto Evergreen Avenue. In addition, one parking space will be eliminated on the west side of Willie Street. A copy of the preliminary site plan depicting the proposed development is included in the Appendix. Pedestrian access to the proposed residential building will be provided via a lobby located on the north side of the building facing Prospect Avenue and in the rear of the building. Additionally, the entrance to the retail space will be provided off Prospect Avenue. mori-Affe, =101 Access to the proposed 59 -space parking garage will be provided off the internal driveway serving the 22 -space parking lot. Visual warning devices should be provided at the garage exit. Access to the parking lot will be provided via the following: A proposed full movement access drive on Evergreen Avenue located approximately 190 feet east of Wille Street, opposite the access drive serving the existing parking lot located on the south side of Evergreen Avenue. This access drive will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements under stop sign control. A proposed full movement access drive on Wille Street located approximately 60 feet north of Evergreen Avenue. This access drive will provide one inbound lane and one outbound lane with outbound movements under stop sign control. 'ry Alotait .:.°gym 's 10 �w 58 The directions from which residents and visitors of the development will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 6 illustrates the directional distribution of the traffic to be generated by the proposed development. The vehicle trip generation for the overall development was calculated using data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The location of the site in close proximity to downtown Mount Prospect and to the Metra train station and other modes of transportation (i.e. car sharing facilities) fit the criterion of a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) that results in less dependence on automobile use. Based on a review of the census data, approximately 10 percent of the residents currently use public transportation. As such, a 10 percent reduction factor was applied to the estimated vehicle traffic to be generated by the residential use. A copy of the census data is included in the Appendix. For the retail use and in order to reflect the mixed-use nature of the development, its synergy with downtown Mount Prospect and internal capture, the estimated trips were reduced by 25 percent. Table 1 shows the estimated vehicle trip generation for the weekday morning, weekday evening as well as daily traffic. Copies of the ITE trip generation worksheets are included in the Appendix. As noted earlier the site is currently occupied by a retail building and as such not all of the trips estimated to be generated by the proposed development will be additive to the roadway system. Table 1 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION ITE Land Use Code Type/Size Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Peak Hour Total Daily Traffic Apartments 221 8 21 29 21 14 35 435 (80 units) - 10 Percent Reduction] -1 -2 -3 -2 -1 -3 -43 Subtotal 7 19 26 19 13 32 392 Retail 820 6 4 10 19 20 39 386 (10,234 sf) - 25 Percent R eduction 2 -1 -1 -2 -S -S -10 -96 Subtotal 5 3 8 14 15 29 290 Total 12 22 34 33 28 61 682 1- Reduction applied due to the proximity of the site to public transportation 2- Reduction applied due to the proximity of the site to downtown and internal capture Pr() (,,)sed Revitletitial Devlel�')I?nzent AlIount Pt-ospec t., lllincfis 59 F-- 0 z 12 Z 0 z /(D Lu L.fW O 0,0 LL Lid Z � Q W � z = U cn W � Q O 0 LU LU M J D N N C:> O Ln L L C C LL 0 0 �3 2 0') O N N o N k*4 -0 ..s O J Z Q) O v ---j c� cn o c ._ a) — E 0 o >0- o cn o � p n o L n O The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject development. The estimated peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. Figure 6 illustrates the assignment of the vehicle traffic volumes to be generated by the proposed development. The existing traffic volumes (Figure 4) were increased by a regional growth factor to account for the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not attributable to any particular planned development). Based on 2050 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) in a letter dated December 14, 2020, the existing traffic volumes were increased by an annually compounded growth rate for six years (one-year buildout plus five years) totaling 4.4 percent to represent Year 2026 total projected conditions. Additionally, the Year 2026 background traffic conditions include the traffic to be generated by the following developments: • The Lofts mixed-use development (which is under construction) located at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maple Street with Prospect Avenue. The existing 97 -unit apartment building located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Main Street and Central Road. The traffic to be generated by this apartment building was included at full occupancy. • The 73 -unit apartment building (which is under construction) located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Northwest Highway with Main Street. Figure 7 shows the Year 2026 background traffic conditions. A copy of the CMAP 2050 projections letter is included in the Appendix. Total Projected Traffic Volumes The total projected traffic volumes include the Year 2026 background traffic volumes (Figure 7) and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development (Figure 6). Figure 8 shows the Year 2026 total projected traffic volumes. Alotait Pi(),vT?ect., Iflitiois 13 OA 61 O z 14 *•J 4-1 E .C/) U cu 70 N a) N N cn 70 0 a) ca E LU o c ._ a) — E 0 o >0- o cn o � p n o n co .� .� N Q U') o - C) IL o C:) CD -0 of 0� 00 O CO LN N O T -Z: M k*4 -0 .. �e �e Q Q LU (/) p O Z W W0- a_ o o Q 4-1 E .C/) U cu 70 N a) N N cn 70 0 a) ca E LU o c ._ a) — E 0 o >0- o cn o � p n o n O z 23 (16) 2 (10) M @)w w� w� F-Cn cncn wW J U JU �a w D z w Q WILLE 'TREET ti N U C C LL 0 0 Q �i 2 O O N N C i O N k*4 -0 ..s O J Z Q) O S/- ---j 0 E 0 ca m O z co N O N a� c� cn O c C= ._ N — E O �0 � > o cn O L O +� n M 1 N4' o NN "� 8 (13) 64 (31) a c535 � �`� (586) 5 c10) 479 (578) � � 0 (2) SIN 58 (64) EET M 24 c33 61 c 51 529 (557) 554 (588) 48 (44) 7 (7) �0 a NOO Aj Boa 26 (53) 4� 001 C s s O Q- v s LU won JQ F cn `� Cdo h �L� � o " t o coy o L 21 cll) 2 (5) N `" `° �► 10 (11) ,� 2 (0) 1' o (0) 2 (5) 2 (5) LO LO o .moo 23 (16) 2 (10) M @)w w� w� F-Cn cncn wW J U JU �a w D z w Q WILLE 'TREET ti N U C C LL 0 0 Q �i 2 O O N N C i O N k*4 -0 ..s O J Z Q) O S/- ---j 0 E 0 ca m O z co N O N a� c� cn O c C= ._ N — E O �0 � > o cn O L O +� n M O z 16 cn w E \O U cu L O U N O L ca O H co N O N L ca a� c� cn O c ._ a) — E 0 QL a)>o U) o C- �p n O L- n n 00 L Q Lf) O C) IL o o CD -0 OOLN O CO N O T -Z: M k*4 -0 .. �e �e Q Q LU (/) p O Z W W0- a_ O o Q cn w E \O U cu L O U N O L ca O H co N O N L ca a� c� cn O c ._ a) — E 0 QL a)>o U) o C- �p n O L- n n The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or modifications are required. Traffic Analyses Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing (Year 2020), no -build (Year 2026), and future projected (Year 2026) traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM),, 6th Edition and analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic 10 software. The analysis for the traffic -signal controlled intersections were accomplished using actual cycle lengths, phasings, and offsets to determine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service. The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing, Year 2026 no -build conditions, and Year 2026 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 2 through 6. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. Proposed Residential Development /ri ..... Mount Prospect, Illinois 17 m OA, �w 65 Q W N CA CA �W W N � 9 i„ kr) O l� O O� • O W N W 06 00 W 06 W o W 06 W o 00 + + W W W W W W 00 00 00 00 00 00 • � 00 � N � N � oo � M � � 00 N oc N - O Q W M W 06 Is-, cy 00 W 00 N - V-) 00 V-) 00 M 06 kn O 00 O o0 00 Q N N N \O - V-) oc oc oc a� W w o w w samnlOA JIJJU.IJL satunlOA1 llullsixg OZOZ.Iuax pllna oN 9ZOZ xuaAPaparo.1,1'. 9 i„ I --I W N W i • 00 O O um* u u N u O u N O N N N N N N ' 00 00 00 00 — o0 00 00 00 N W� 00 Way Woo oo Wo O Way o0 Wcn, — ' oc W oo W 00 W 00 W Wr-� 44 r-, W W W W W W W� 00 Wr_: O W o0 r_: W� O Way O O O O O O 0o I �1 O I Q 00 I Q O oc I �1 06 oc sawnlOA JIJJR.IJL 0 a'. satunlOA1 1 1 '. 1. 1 '. i Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS — EXISTING CONDITIONS - UNSIGNALIZED Wille Street with Prospect Avenue • Northbound Approach A 9.1 A 9.3 • Westbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 7.5 Wille Street with Evergreen Avenue • Northbound Left Turns B 10.1 A 9.8 • Eastbound Approach A 7.4 A 7.3 • Westbound Approach A 7.5 A 7.2 • Southbound Left Turns A 9.3 A 9.2 Evergreen Avenue with Main Street • Eastbound Right Turns B 10.3 B 10.1 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 68 Table 5 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS — NO BUILD CONDITIONS - UNSIGNALIZED Wille Street with Prospect Avenue • Northbound Approach A 9.2 A 9.5 • Westbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 7.5 Wille Street with Evergreen Avenue • Northbound Left Turns B 10.1 A 9.8 • Eastbound Approach A 7.4 A 7.4 • Westbound Approach A 7.5 A 7.2 • Southbound Left Turns A 9.3 A 9.2 Evergreen Avenue with Main Street • Eastbound Right Turns B 10.6 B 10.2 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. 69 Table 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS — TOTAL PROJECTED CONDITIONS - UNSIGNALIZED Wille Street with Prospect Avenue • Northbound Approach A 9.3 A 9.4 • Westbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 7.5 Wille Street with Evergreen Avenue • Northbound Left Turns B 10.1 A 9.8 • Eastbound Approach A 7.4 A 7.4 • Westbound Approach A 7.5 A 7.2 • Southbound Left Turns A 9.4 A 9.3 Evergreen Avenue with Main Street • Eastbound Right Turns B 10.7 B 10.3 Wille Street with Proposed Full Movement Access Drive • Westbound Approach A 8.5 A 8.5 • Southbound Left Turns A 7.2 A 7.2 Evergreen Avenue with Proposed Full Movement Access Drive • Southbound Approach A 8.9 A 8.9 • Westbound Left Turns A 0.1 A 0.1 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. Alfowit Pi-o,Tec t., fllitufis 22 70 The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identifies any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development traffic. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The westbound approach currently operates at LOS D during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS E during the weekday evening peak hour. In addition, the eastbound and southbound approaches currently operate at LOS E during both peak hours, and the northbound approach currently operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2026 no -build conditions, overall this intersection will continue to operate at LOS D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than five seconds. All approaches will continue to operate at the same existing levels of service, except for the westbound approach which will operate at LOS E during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS F during the weekday evening peak hour with increases in delay of four seconds and 12 seconds, respectively. Under 2026 total projected conditions, overall this intersection will continue to operate at LOS D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second over no -build conditions. All approaches will continue to operate at the same levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second over no -build conditions. Furthermore, the proposed development is projected to increase the volume of traffic traversing this intersection by less than one percent during both peak hours. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic projected to be generated by the development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Main Street with Prospect Avenue and Evergreen Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at LOS D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The eastbound, westbound and northbound approaches currently operate at LOS E during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. In addition, the southbound approach currently operates at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2026 no -build conditions, this intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of approximately four seconds or less. All approaches are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during both peak hours, except for the northbound approach which will operate at LOS F during both peak hours with increases in delay of approximately 11 seconds or less. Under Year 2026 total projected conditions, this intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of approximately one second over no -build conditions. The eastbound approach will operate at LOS tits fllitul)i Is, 23 0A'N%"%k 71 F during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of approximately 10 seconds and one second, respectively. All of the other approaches will operate at the same levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second over no -build conditions. Furthermore, the proposed development is projected to increase the volume of traffic traversing this intersection by approximately one percent during the weekday morning peak hour and three percent during the weekday evening peak hour. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic projected to be generated by the development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Wille Street with Prospect Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the northbound approach currently operates at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. In addition, the westbound left turning movements are operating at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2026 no -build conditions, all movements are projected to operate at the same existing levels of service with increases in delay of less than one second during both peak hours. Under Year 2026 total projected conditions, all movements will continue operating at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second over no -build conditions. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic projected to be generated by the development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Wille Street with Evergreen Avenue The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the northbound left turning movements are operating at LOS B during the weekday morning peak hour and LOS A during the weekday evening peak hour. In addition, all of the other movements currently operate at LOS A during both peak hours. Under Year 2026 no -build conditions, all movements are projected to continue operating at the same existing levels of service during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. Under Year 2026 total projected conditions, all movements will continue operating at the same levels of service during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second over no -build conditions. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic projected to be generated by the development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. tits fllitul)i 24 OA� MMWW_ 1 k 72 intersection)Main Street with Evergreen Avenue (unsignalized The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the eastbound right turning movements currently operate at LOS B during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Under Year 2026 no -build conditions, the eastbound right turning movements are projected to continue operating at LOS B during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second. Under Year 2026 total projected conditions, the eastbound right turning movements will continue to operate at LOS B during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than one second over no -build conditions. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic projected to be generated by the development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Wille Street with Proposed Full Movement Access Drive The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the outbound movements are projected to operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with 95th percentile queues of one to two vehicles. In addition, the southbound left turning movements are projected to operate at LOS A during both peak hours with 95th percentile queues of one to two vehicles. As such, this access drive will be adequate in accommodating the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure efficient and flexible access is provided. Evergreen Avenue with Proposed Full Movement Access Drive As previously indicated, the west end of the remaining median along Evergreen Avenue (between the proposed access drive and Main Street) will be modified to allow left -turn outbound movements from the proposed driveway onto Evergreen Avenue. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the outbound movements are projected to operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with 95th percentile queues of one to two vehicles. In addition, the westbound left turning movements are projected to operate at LOS A during both peak hours with 95th percentile queues of one to two vehicles. As such, this access drive will be adequate in accommodating the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure efficient and flexible access is provided. 73 Mount Prospect Downtown Area Improvements As previously indicated, the findings of the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study identified that congestion of traffic within the downtown area was primarily attributed to the at grade rail crossings at IL Route 83 and Emerson Street which are regularly blocked by Metra commuter trains during the peak periods. The study identified several key area improvements to significantly improve the operations of the downtown area. The more feasible improvements that can be completed in the short term to enhance the flow of traffic within the downtown area as follows: • The intersections of IL Route 83 with Northwest Highway and Prospect Avenue currently have one pedestrian push button per corner. When pressed the pedestrian phase is called in both directions. Calling the pedestrian phase for both legs of the intersection may cause unnecessary green time allocation to an approach with no vehicles/pedestrian present. The installation of directional pedestrian push buttons at the intersections will reduce the number of false calls, allowing green time at the intersection to be allocated to approaches with higher traffic and pedestrian volumes. • The Village has plans to coordinate with Metra to develop a new location for train engineers to stop the inbound trains at the station thus allowing the railroad gates at IL Route 83 to remain open (up position) an thus allowing, the continued flow of traffic. In doing so, itis estimated that the time train gates are down approximately 11 minutes during the 90 -minute morning rush period by and approximately four minutes during the 90 - minute evening rush period. It should be noted that relocating the stopping zone for inbound trains will require the extension of the southerly train platform. It should be noted that the results of the capacity analyses did not take into consideration the operations of the intersections of Main Street with Northwest Highway and Prospect Avenue/Evergreen Avenue during train events which cause increased queueing and delay along these approaches. However, as previously indicated, the Village of Mount Prospect is considering several short-term and long-term area improvements to help enhance the flow of traffic within the downtown area. Also, as shown previously, the traffic that will be generated by the proposed development is projected to increase the traffic traveling through these intersections by less than three percent during both peak hours, and as such, will have a limited impact on the operations of the intersections and will not significantly increase the volume of traffic traversing the intersections. Pro r � tit ,11111'. . ' 74 monsugam" 9,M mo As previously indicated, the proposed development will have approximately 80 apartment units (48 two-bedroom units and 32 one -bedroom units), an approximate 10,234 square feet of ground floor retail, and will provide a total of 81 on-site parking spaces. In addition, approximately 23 parking spaces will be leased within the existing 49 -space parking lot located on the west side of Wille Street for residential uses. It should be noted that retail customers will be expected to utilize area on -street parking. Therefore, the proposed development will provide a total of 104 parking spaces for residential uses, at a ratio of 1.3 spaces per unit, and will provide 128 bedrooms, at a ratio of 0.81 spaces per bedroom. As such, the parking supply was analyzed with 104 parking spaces (which includes the 23 parking spaces that will be leased within the existing 49 -space parking lot). In order to determine the projected parking demand of the proposed development, the parking demand was estimated based on the Village of Mount Prospect Code, and the rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition. Based on the two methodologies, the parking demand for the proposed development is as follows: • One -bedroom units (32 units) 0 32 parking spaces (ratio of one parking space per dwelling unit) • Two-bedroom units (48 units) 0 72 parking spaces (ratio of LS parking space per dwelling unit) Based on the above and the requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, this translates into 104 parking spaces, which results in a deficit of zero parking spaces. It is also important to note that this ratio does not take into account the proximity of the site to downtown Mount Prospect and to the Metra train station and other modes of transportation as well as availability of on street parking for the retail customers. ITE Parking Generation Manual • Residential Use (Multifamily Housing Mid -Rise less than 0.5 mile to rail transit —Land Use Code 221): 0 90 parking spaces (ratio of 1.12 spaces per dwelling unit) Based on the above and the rates published in the ITE Parking Generation Manual, this translates into 90 parking spaces, which results in a surplus of 14 parking spaces. Therefore, the proposed parking supply of 104 parking spaces exceeds ITE's requirements of 90 parking spaces. „sly tits .tfllituIs, 27 75 As previously indicated, the proposed development will provide a total of 104 parking spaces for residential uses, at a ratio of 1.3 spaces per unit, and will provide 128 bedrooms, at a ratio of 0.81 spaces per bedroom.The proposed parking supply of 1.3 spaces per unit is consistent with some of the other apartment developments (built or planned) in the Chicago area listed in Table A in the Appendix and exceeds the average ratio of 1.22 spaces per unit. A%'ff.OA'N%"%k 76 Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been made: The volume of traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development will be reduced due to the proximity of the development to the Mount Prospect Metra Train Station, which qualifies the development as a TOD. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the proposed development traffic will not have a significant impact on the area roadways. The development -generated traffic will only add approximately one percent and three percent of the traffic projected to be traversing the intersection of Main Street with Prospect Avenue during the weekday morning and evening peak hours, respectively. Visual warning devices should be provided at the garage exit. The proposed access drive will be adequate in accommodating the traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure that a flexible access system is provided. The improvements identified in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study will significantly enhance the flow of traffic within the downtown area and will reduce vehicle delay and queueing. The proposed parking that will be provided on site in combination with the adjacent parking lot and on street parking will ensure that adequate parking is provided to accommodate its projected parking demand. 29 AV Awn,A%'ff.0A'N%"%k 77 Appendix Traffic Count Summary Sheets Preliminary Site Plan Census Data ITE Trip Generation Worksheets CMAP 2050 Projections Letter Level of Service Criteria Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Parking Ratios of Similar Developments 78 Traffic Count Summary Sheets 79 -70 O O O O M O O CO r r M , O't M mt O r It O N CO O CD CY) O M r r r r N r N r CO N N M N r r r CO C) N 0.) O O N C QM 00Ln � O r O O r r O O N M N N N Lo T N O O CO N O O O r NZ) r,l -- C,j " 10 C) W l„„j ( m0,4 ( n m m m m m m m m d Q (D N (3)70 M O O O O O r O O O r r N O M W M r O O -TT N M c O 6 r 6 O a) O L N C0 �o > LO m W —rn rn o r U) O r O O r O O O N N O O N N � r r O O N O CV 07 00 00 O O O NC) O O 7C)z C O p C U J O O O O O O O O O O r O O O r O O O O O r It C r C) O Q O C) Oma}' (� Ucncncna_ Q N r r r Ln r O N f - M M NC) O r M d7 C'! O N 00 O O N Q� r N O N O CO O �„cn : I I I I I I I ,I IIS„� w:"wM� win:" � p ,� co I I I I I I I CDw �”,I . I I I I I , I I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m C L O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD CD 7-0 a�IMIMI�lrlrl�l” I�Irlrl�IMI�IpI�Ico Nlplrl"I�I�I"t �I-I"I IIco I "�'tj-Cco O CD Irl I� ry ::::n I o I— I w „,� I" I I 1: I D I w ::::n I— I m I I r I �I I� I co I„ I ,^:) I I I Il u I w I 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 VI I VI I VI I VI 4) C O O 70 C L O E O O O O O O O O O O 1 r O O r N O O O O O N O r O O N 00 r O Q O O O O O 0 O r O N O M O O r O r r O L) r I- O r O N MN O O O r O N W a) � r C) Z r r r r M r O r 1.0 N r r M f- N O O r M Lo M r CO � f� � 0') O C O r Co Lf) O O O 00 C T- C ,� (fl Ln LO O C) -f--j (1) r O O r r O O r N r N N O M O O O O O 00 N N M � O r N O N C: O O +, N A.- 4-1 L �r QO � �� C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 g 0 0 O o o O cam 'E c6rn uC 00 w _ O % Q 0 In In In � r O N r r M r M r O M , O N LO r W r M N N M M r r r r� r O Ln MO N , CD � r � p O C) co N O r 5O ()0 G 0 M d p lI=l � u 40 w � m tlw � 8� i i1w��, i.w .70 , , m m m m m m m m m m m J ti �LO O .�_ -E O E a� Or o C) N i 0 _0 Q D O O O r O r O r N O CO M r O N M O O O O O COIt O O 07 O O O O O O r O a) N N W L LO L0 N M r Lf) N O r r r r r O 00 M f` r M r 00 r O N f� "t r O r Ln r CO 1.0 N 00 r M Op f: Op (O O r N r O O O r LO N r M r r JCo O N r M r r N O O r O r N r r N r Ln U') O N T O 0 O C L O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD CD 7-0 a�IMIMI�lrlrl�l” I�Irlrl�IMI�IpI�Ico Nlplrl"I�I�I"t �I-I"I IIco I "�'tj-Cco O CD Irl I� ry ::::n I o I— I w „,� I" I I 1: I D I w ::::n I— I m I I r I �I I� I co I„ I ,^:) I I I Il u I w I 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 VI I VI I VI I VI 4) C O O r O O O r N r N r O O O N r M O O O O O O r co N M O r O O O O O O O O O O O O (1) (3) U) O co W r O N O M O O r O r r O L) r I- O r O N MN O O O r O N W r C) i O O O O O O O r O O r O O O O O O O O O O r � � O Q O Q O r O i � r (1) U) _0 a) (a CO C6 (6 (6 0 C O 2 o 2 o Y 2 o 2 o o� o �, cn ami L co U) Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a a a a s � �. 0 w~ a, --,e C: ~ AJ O L() CD Lo > O L+ Lo O Lo > O U)+ W O Lo � % O O ' Lo Lo p O m O� U D co O r M 1:T O r M O r M O r M C L O J m j C L (Q L a) r:,: :0' 06 00 M 00 p m 4 4 � O 6 Ln 6 Ln O T Q� c o a) (� ~ = Q~ U (n Q m 80 81 -70 0 O ti O O cm O o p OC)O, LO r r r N Lr) �"t o C) CIO N — O o Q0 r O O r N c� Lq r p O r in Q C:O 0 � O �' -0 0) O O O r r p 00 N O q O p r C) E O O L N U) �o > LO m w C)—> 0 0 0 r > v) r O O Om r O N r 00 O p O N 'n O M � Z Coca }, O r �(�� ) O O o 0 0 o N o 0 O O :3 N N O O}'�(� Ucncncnam O 0 0-0 0 r r r � f� 1 04 � Cp � p o r � o C o C)1 1 �o a l CD 10`4 10 I ,.. I ,'1,,1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N I +til a I a.,.,,„,n I I°, „„p I10 D 7 �CCD C: O O 70 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I p I p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 O N 0E CO�° O N ti M O N r O p O o r O O O O Q 1 1 > LU r Ln Ln Z i r r r M C4 Lii O O LO LO � O O O r ~ M O O O O O O 1 1 �• � M O 00 T- M O O C c) � CO }0 M N J O O O r r r N O r CD r O p O C O C O � 1 1 O-1., L O 5 � r Q m U) c) O O O O O O O O p p O 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 10 TO'E c6 L7 p aLo M 1 N co o CO 00 o0 O p (V � r N r N 1 1 ()C) 70 +-� 70 Nm i �,�� , ... d� v ..... J C W LO O)ti O (D O o U) o > N -0 O Q LD) O r O O r N 00N p r C6 D r O p O C O C O � 1 1 � O N N D Ln N O O � Ln M M Ln N O O O CD O r C M r CM r CM 1 1 > LU 00 Lo O m L a) J O N r r T OO O LO M O p r O Lf) O 0 O Q 1 1 L CD p p p pO O O O p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 C1 0Q� M r 't CN r 1 N O O � O Or � p O r o O C r 00 1 1 a I a.,.,,„,n I I°, „„p I10 D 7 �CCD C: O O O O O N N I- (p C9 O N N O 00 O O O CD O Q O co W O N O O N ti M O N r O p O r O O O O Q 1 1 > LU r Ln Ln i O O O O O C:) c) � O O O O O O � N � o U U O � G � (fi L L c: ICU Ln o LO O o O 2 Ln D c O o r M � 0 Q O J a m m �_ L L V �/ N _0 C � 00 Q \ \ N (n~ � Q~ U m N Q \ o U \ o Q m 82 0 H N N in Q C) 0 O L N C0 �o > LO m W O 0 r � M � O Z OQz C N +1 N N N O}'�(� Ucncncni O Q� L o Q0 N O O r M 1 -4 M (� CD O p O C O 0 O C)1 1 O r a I11.. I w I i,,.., I- I I m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m I m l m I m l m I .) I^^' D � 70 Q C: O O �\ 70 O O O O O O O p O 0 O p O 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 O r /G tjE CO N M nj L M M O O O O O O 1 1 > O °' O O O O O OLU O > Z N O O r M OLr)O O O M O O p O O p O p O p O 1 1 r O r 0 co O Cc)4-0 CO J O O O O O C; � c) p O O 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 O L O � r Q U) c)O O O O O O O O p p O 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 (ate QirnLO = O C LO Q 1 o p O p O p O (+7 (0 1 1 cm W^11 00 70 Y. +-1 0 d m �'��,�� , ... d� v ..... J C ^ 1 W LO �ti O � 0 C) N 0 ; a)-0 O Q' o 0m O O O o 0 0 0 0 o 0 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 C 0 a� O 2> O > L "t r O r L r M O O N 00 o � ti N "t co M O O O O O O O O O M (D 1 1 >LU O O O O L r r N r In O CSO• 1.0 (q In O O O 0 O 0 O Q 1 1 J L CD p p p pO p r O p O O O p O r 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 o N ti 1 O 00 O ti O CD p O p 0 p O p O 1 1 a I11.. I w I i,,.., I- I I m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m I m l m I m l m I .) I^^' D � 70 Q C: O O O O O O O O p O O 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 O � Lco w O r O N M nj L M M O O O O O 1 1 > O O O O O OLU i O O O O O C:) c) � O O 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 � N � o U U O � G U)L L c: ICU ~ o o Lo o 2 �_ �� o j, 0 i ai L O r M N r L O J rY1 C L -� L V „y 0 � Ln Ln 0- J o O N �~ Q~ U no nN yr O ci 0 n O Q m 83 N � N L O I� M CO O r r 00 LC) N CO Lf) 07 r 00 M r O ~ r r r r co N N M N Or 1 It LO M M co M M M Lr)00 1 1 r- O N p r � O �-+ - O Q M M O Or LO M LO r 1 M LO O N N r Lo Lo m w LO � Q C Q Q U O CN cn U) N O O 70 E- - - - T- m c Z U) -0 0) CO M N O 00 11.0 N M r r 1 It N It 00 00 r r M M fD 6j Lo M O r N O O 1 1 O p Z N = E r r ti O -t O O N O O 4--1 _tf cU+j N — O Z3 O L Z O :tf 2 0cncna- OI rl rl rl MI rl OI rl NI �I rl ONI NI rl OI OI CD 1 OI CD I OI CD I rl 00 L O O O O O O O O O O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 p 1 1 1 0 ~ I� M Co It O � M LO M 1 O r-- r N O Lo 00 00 r N r0 1 Lq co � r u7 r Ln r -P N O 1 1 Q N r r M N N r r I� r r r N f� N r O L -q O O O r O f` O O N r O 00 r 1 r N O M CD 00 O 00 N 00 N 1 Lq m M r M M O O N 07 1 1 Q r M r r N Ln N N N r ti r N r r Cfl N � N � O f O O C: „�„�@ I o' ��„.�.�, I 11,C) . I ..... I �,�. �u I ��;��..,u I �...,� I I m l ,��.....I CD I (11444 I CD I I i, .,� I r,Y) I ��...,� I d .�.,� I �N',.:'N I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I;"�� N C: N 70C > �. Q O O O O O r O O r N 1 r r N M f— N r O r M �` r'IT O cp O r ti O O r ti 1 1 N N r Lf) N r O Il_ O ti 00 Q m O W ^L LL CD CD N �I Lo ~I ~I Orl NI rl rl NI ~I �I 1 I m NI rl OI I CrOI �I �I rl COI NI OI NI NI co CD NI OI OI CD I rl CD I 1 I 1 � O r O O O r O O O O O 1 r r r r O r N O M 0o m � 00 O q O q O q (ZD q 1 1 r U) U 70 M co 0 70 f6 (0 0 = L 5 L O o Ln o Ln o Ln o Ln w o Lfi o Lf� o Lf� o Lc> >> 70 m �_ O N a� cn (�B O r M O r M O r M O r M (a Q ° J o m :i 5m j O O U N f� I� 0 00 00 00 00 ° m 4 .4 .4 ° Ln Ln Ln Ln p s_ \ \ N 2 2 *k 2 2 UI Q o o U 0: iT) IE Q m m o o Q oPl 84 OOO `" U r O N C6 ,.... „,.... 0 o 0 �. 0o m .� CD, ol (D C) d,"D C) 0 0 ICI m m m m m m m m m m m m CD m C O O O O co ca �, p p.5 m +-+ cn cn Q O M OCF) O M 1 00 N� C) Lf) CO ao ao O � co co co r-- r O r C r � N 1 1 qrr^^ V! � I OD -- O ^L > LL " O .S — � . V J �ti O� 0 CC G O � OC) u J r O O O r O r r O N 1 r r O N N O O N It r Lo L!) M N r r p O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 1 L70r J �Lo O .� O N N i 0 O O O O O O O r r N 1 r O O O r O O O O O MO M O O O O O 1 1 � r O O O O O f` O O N r O 00 r 1 r N O M CD 00 O 00 N 00 N 1 Lq m M r M M O O N 07 1 1 Q r M r r N Ln N N N r ti r N r r Cfl N � N � O f O O C: „�„�@ I o' ��„.�.�, I 11,C) . I ..... I �,�. �u I ��;��..,u I �...,� I I m l ,��.....I CD I (11444 I CD I I i, .,� I r,Y) I ��...,� I d .�.,� I �N',.:'N I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I m I;"�� N C: N 70C > �. Q O O O O O r O O r N 1 r r N M f— N r O r M �` r'IT O cp O r ti O O r ti 1 1 N N r Lf) N r O Il_ O ti 00 Q m O W ^L LL CD CD N �I Lo ~I ~I Orl NI rl rl NI ~I �I 1 I m NI rl OI I CrOI �I �I rl COI NI OI NI NI co CD NI OI OI CD I rl CD I 1 I 1 � O r O O O r O O O O O 1 r r r r O r N O M 0o m � 00 O q O q O q (ZD q 1 1 r U) U 70 M co 0 70 f6 (0 0 = L 5 L O o Ln o Ln o Ln o Ln w o Lfi o Lf� o Lf� o Lc> >> 70 m �_ O N a� cn (�B O r M O r M O r M O r M (a Q ° J o m :i 5m j O O U N f� I� 0 00 00 00 00 ° m 4 .4 .4 ° Ln Ln Ln Ln p s_ \ \ N 2 2 *k 2 2 UI Q o o U 0: iT) IE Q m m o o Q oPl 84 N � N L M CO r � r r r N Cfl � O �-+ 75- (y) M M O L r � Q r � Q C Q Q U O O N 0 0- O U) N O O F= . . - O N (1) c Z Q z m _O M N O U') Or O LO L 00 O O O O O �--r C U �--+ O � p 07 r O r Z3N i Z 0 :tf Ucncna- O o a O r O O r r co N r o p O p O p O p 0 ai r o O o 0 0 0 L O jO O O O O O O O O O O au)��"°„,� I �..µ� I o�..° I I y��...,i I m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l ";;.tl I � N O N 70C :3 O O Q � O7 O O O r r N O q O 0 r 00 O O N to p r Q m O W ^L LL ,,� HI �I �I OI rl Lr) MI OI �I OI MI r-7 � OI OI rl NI OI C) OI C) � O O O O O C:) � � O O O O O O . . . U) U O Y 70 M 1 U U c L O fn C U LLa� U) ±.f c-0 o oco cn _� o 0 0 0 � m cn � a�'i cu r� r� oo 15:~ Q J m o= U> a C fn tf Q .2 m o Cl) o Q o 85 5�\ G O ~ Q Q M CO � I 1 O N O-- O 00 r p O p O p O p O ' ^ L , a 00 r U) (1) �-0 0- n m m 111 m m m m m m C) mco C - O p C) co A.-> Z Q Cn O CY)N Q O L M (.0"T� �` r O O O N O O �` r O O O O O O O O O O O H OLO E O O O•� fn '� O� W �. C) CD 94 �_ 004-10 O O O O O c, 6O p O O O O O O ^�11 W O)ti O O i a)(✓ (n 0 > i O O O O O O O p O O O O O � O •L ~ ti ti M 6 O Ce) p O O N Cfl U-) p O CDO p O QLO OO au)��"°„,� I �..µ� I o�..° I I y��...,i I m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l m l ";;.tl I � N O N 70C :3 O O Q � O7 O O O r r N O q O 0 r 00 O O N to p r Q m O W ^L LL ,,� HI �I �I OI rl Lr) MI OI �I OI MI r-7 � OI OI rl NI OI C) OI C) � O O O O O C:) � � O O O O O O . . . U) U O Y 70 M 1 U U c L O fn C U LLa� U) ±.f c-0 o oco cn _� o 0 0 0 � m cn � a�'i cu r� r� oo 15:~ Q J m o= U> a C fn tf Q .2 m o Cl) o Q o 85 N � N O LO rn r O (Y) ~ co M 't M Lr) i N � sz c a a� Q U O OOcn U) N O O 70 OM m (� N +� . o N cr') O Z Q z � _� r r t M O� O � m 00 O p O O O �--r O p r cU+� N — o D N Z 0 :tf Ucncna- a)rl OI rl NI �I OMI NI 4? c5D �I CD OI OI OI C I OI CD OI O L O j O O O O OCD C5 O O O O O O n u) l P I W,"�.w'N I P•,.."� I tl,„.'...” 1 7„°' ]' I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I tl;,"M.;'N I r,0 C_ > 70 C > :3 O O Q�O7 N r O r � O p q p q p q p N N Ln N O O O O O O Q L1J O ^L LL � I CD I ()o l CD I r l O I O I co I 00 CD I C) O I O I O I C) O I C) O I C) L LO o O r N O C7 1: q M O p q p q C:) N O O O O O O U) U O Y 70 CII 1 U U c L O fn C co U LL a) U) L LO LO Ln 1.0~ Q J m o rj)UU U a Cl) o a Q m m 86 5�\ G 0 r LO 00 00 r N O r O O O O O O Q C a C) L6 C r U) 0n I � m m m m m m m m m m m m m �„) m C C) p C) �-0 0- co cu 194- (3) cu 0-5 � > � '^ v J V J� a O U 00 00 d7 d7 O7 QO O O O O C O O C)r LO i i TO E c6OL I bLiz co c O•- O� r11 /V! I..L +. co co O O O i_ 00 }1 0 N O O N � Lo N O O p O p Cl p O p O 70 j - J p r W LO O)~ -E LO Q ,..., i a)W (n 00 > i O O O O O q q O p O O O O O � O •� L a0 O oD LO 00 CD � O O (o r O OCD p O O C O CD Q n u) l P I W,"�.w'N I P•,.."� I tl,„.'...” 1 7„°' ]' I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I III I tl;,"M.;'N I r,0 C_ > 70 C > :3 O O Q�O7 N r O r � O p q p q p q p N N Ln N O O O O O O Q L1J O ^L LL � I CD I ()o l CD I r l O I O I co I 00 CD I C) O I O I O I C) O I C) O I C) L LO o O r N O C7 1: q M O p q p q C:) N O O O O O O U) U O Y 70 CII 1 U U c L O fn C co U LL a) U) L LO LO Ln 1.0~ Q J m o rj)UU U a Cl) o a Q m m 86 Preliminary Site Plan 87 E E Z O � W 1S -7771M Q N F z 0LL- o N Q m W N cc CC) m i N W C7 a N LL- LL - Om (J)N co co O LL. r N V W N r oN CC ZD du O O O Z p LL O w J J LJL w H U = Q Q X o m cn F- 00 00 z LU a O D- W 0 0 0 0 0 LULU w U Q J U) gobF IL LU X a w L; O a O o �i c)za� n 0 q N aa0oo c o a a v N N a � � o - � o y O CO M v ( M N N O CEJ M t O r M V O O i O N O GO n C X J (� O n � - r W O o o M O O m CO (6 O N 0 O 7 L I� z LU CL O OJ v w o C) 0 Q w Q (n cn o j cn w o cn i w zp U C w w z z X Z m Q 0 m w C..) z Q 0_ v W L CL U w o z D CL 0_ J m Q z w Q) > Q ULLJ cY w 0 a' W v LU O Q LLI LL- T:� O< Q m \ O a LU LLI W� OL m O W X C� z z w N w U > Q w Q J o� J 0- Q Q uQ ��- w Z N m m Q Z Q Q Z Z N Q LU (- z� O `t 0 0 LLI C w J U _ w > N o w �z ak wO Oo- C=) 0 0 -LL- �w m w � w (,n to - . m ~ z x m C -) vi Q o U3 ui w c v—N, a z O F-- F-- z O O O O Q J J N= O m cn w o E) J z Q z o N X w Q 2 = a Y�}> z= a m F LL w N o m w w o O N LU Lij = U cm Q z d N o 2!! m O X z Q U z Y a J Q Z o V) i / O c' '' W W i� U) O U ^\ a w } U m E E Z O � W 1S -7771M Q N F z 0LL- o N Q m W N cc CC) m i N W C7 a N LL- LL - Om (J)N co co O LL. r N V W N r oN CC ZD du O O O Z p LL O w J J LJL w H U = Q Q X o m cn F- 00 00 z LU a O D- W 0 0 0 0 0 LULU w U Q J U) gobF IL LU X a w L; O a O o �i c)za� n 0 q N aa0oo c o a a v N N a � � o - � o y O CO M v ( M N N O CEJ M t O r M V O O i O N O GO n C X J (� O n � - r W O o o M O O m CO (6 O N 0 O 7 L I� Census Data 89 �C T 81 A" R11", S ff� 1101111NITED Database I OG OU I USER GUhl''YE !slp� S I A I ��G[q 0XIIII)S Trms�it Zc)�r�ie: * ,,25 rn�lle 0 ,,5 nn�lle E2 &rnarl-, Zoumi Pa, a % Geogf."m SdbCtE)d Stablu� i * Stablun 0 Eklsbl�r'ig 5��a�ri§lt Fra is It ra�ri§lt [�Reg�bri .............. ............................................................................................. . ................................................................................................................. TOD Report J �jy MA View as: .......... I �1�b�le List Download as: Wurd CSV Chicago Transit Region: . .. .... .. . . It "'d "S r I'' 'S "Ad A "A'Al(l, L L "U" 'U Am's, MAO', pm 17, 1P 'F 011IM/1 Y1 W, or IF 1H I 90 avaiH4N�e �)e�r' iotjse[i(,)��d 20(1)(9: (9) AveIrage Ilrwu r'rflber' ve[ fl!6Ies 1.74 avaiH4Uk,. peIr' !�'x')useV'16Id 2009�� OneIi' agerlUi� rflbe�r' o f ve[ fl!(',.IIes 1.23 avE!)i�'Mr' ["K)Uselio��d Oc,ctipied: (11) P&m&rit 0 f I` IOLAse['xI d s li "tl 0 ollr 1 50.92 ve[ii6�e avaiH4N�e 2009: (12) Medi4r'i Yealr' SI]n j c tt,,,ii IIrWe IIB t. liillll t, 1,973 2 0 0 (Z'): (13) 1 The year in which this station opened. This value is intended to inform the analysis of available statistics, and therefore all stations open priorto 2000 report as ® the year of the earliest available statistic. 2 Station location, current as of January 1, 2021. Station locations are updated (as necessary) on a quarterly basis which may result in changes in aggregated data. 3 American Community Survey ® 5 -Year Estimates b08013 — 001 / b08132001 aggregated from Census 2009 Tracts 4 American Community Survey ® 5 -Year Estimates bl 9013001 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 5 American Community Survey ® 5 -Year Estimates (b08301_010) / (b08301_001) aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 6 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates (b08301_018 ) / (b08301_001) aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 7 American Community Survey ® 5 -Year Estimates (b08301_019) / (bO8301_001) aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 8 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates (b08301010 + b08301018 + b08301019) / (b08301001) aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 9 American Community Survey ® 5 -Year Estimates b25046 — 001 / b25044001 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 10 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b25046002 / b25044002 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 11 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b25046 — 003 / b25044 — 009 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 12 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates (b25044003+b25044004+b2504401 O+b2504401 1) / b25044001 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 13 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b25035001 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups @ (.'..qjoyirJg1I,-it 2009 21 C e "i t e - f ') ir Ir e ii g �� . ..... 1 1 7 Nor'flh State Stre(--'..,,t 4-:14,00, Gl,flcago,III I . 60602 1 (773) 27& 4800 91 ITE Trip Generation Worksheets 92 Multifamily Housing (M"I'disnRise) (221) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Unit On a: Weekday Setting/Locations. General Urban/Siuburba Num ber of Studies: 27 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units- 2,05 Directional Distribution: 5iOi% entering, 50% exiting X/ohitAck Trip (Zonornfinn nor rlwollinri I Inif wV*0MIM%0M%0, in onto V%os 9"FIFIFNWIMINIZI %0111% Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.03 Diata Plot and Equatioln 3,0,00 x x 2,500 x x 2,000 x w x .CL x x x 1,500 x x x 1,000 x x XX 500 x X X 00 100 2®0 300 400 500 X Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fifted Curve - - - - Average, Data Fitted Curve Equatiow T = 5.45(X) - 1.75 R2= 017 ---------------------------------- 93 Multifamily Housing (M"I'disnRise) (221) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a. m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 53 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units- 2017 Directional Distribution: ring, 74% exiting X/ohitAck Trip (Zonornfinn nor rlwollinri I Inif wV*0MIM%0M%0, in onto V%os 9"FIFIFNWIMINIZI %0111% Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.36 O.o,6 - 1.61 0.19 Diata Plot and Equatioln 300 x w CL 200 x x x le oe x Ile .10 00 x oe le x le oe xIle 10 x 100 x x x x x x x x I X X x A 0 Lxx ",e 0 200 400 600 800 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fifted Curve - - - - Average, Rate Fitted Curve Equatiow Ln(T) = 0.98 Ln(X) - 0.98 R2= 0.67 ---------------------------------- 94 Multifamily Housing (M"I'disnRise) (221) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 60 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units- 2018 Directional Distribution: ring, 39% exiting X/ohitAck Trip (Zonornfinn nor rlwollinri I Inif wV*0MIM%0M%0, in onto V%os 9"FIFIFNWIMINIZI %0111% Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.44 ® 1.11 0.19 Diata Plot and Equatioln 400 x 300 w Q_ IIx x x x 200 x x x x XX X, �00 x 100 x X< x x x x x x ��x x X X X x x x 00 200 400 600 800 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fifted Curve - - - - Average, Rate Fitted Curve Equatiow Ln(T) = 0.96 Ln(X) - 0.63 R2= 012 ---------------------------------- 95 z 'hopping Center (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 101010 Siq. Ft. GLA On a-. Weekday Setting/L,ocations General Uriban/Siuburban Nmbie�r of Studiesi: 147 100101 Sq. Ft. GLA- 453 Crectional Diistribiuti�oin: 501% e�n�teiri�ng, 5iO% exiting I/ahit%la Trini 9'..,onarnfinn nar innn _Qq rf ri A %w 9 1 11140 IIIIIII100%ol 111%pil V*w %11 a a % a Ni 1%— 1-11, Average Rate Range of Rates 37.75 7.42 - 207.98 Diata Plot and Equatioln (n w -a c 40,0,00 CL M.0 30,000 a Standard Deviation 161. 4 1 a s X .01 .01 X X X olo X X 00 X X oo X X 00 X X X 10, XX X XX X le X 40 X X X Of X X 10, le XX A .10 Y A XX X X X XX X X')< X X X X X XXX Y�< > < X X X X X X X X X X X X 500 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Studv Site Pitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.68 Ln(X) + 5.57 1,0001 1,500 - - - - Average Rate R 2= 0.76 96 hoppi r (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 10I010 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setti ng/L,ocation: General Urban/Suburban Nu�mber of Studies: 84 10010, Sq. Ft. GLA: 351 Directional Distri butui ring, 38% exiting X/ohit%la Tr"Ini ilanarnfinin nor innn _Qq rf rzi j& w %0 1 19 1 %F 0 %0 IN 1 5 to '%ww %0 1 11 %0 1 %AK 16 5 %0 1 11 10 %0 1 In %R ® %f %0 %1 a 5 No a v4wr I&— #—"% Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.94 0.18 ® 23.74 0.87 Diata Plot and Equatioln X 1,000 C w CL 500 K X X o0 0 500 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.50(X),+ 151.78 1,000, 1,500 - - - - Average Rate R1= 0.50 97 hoppi r (820) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 10I010 Sq. Ft. GLA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setti ng/L,ocation: General Urban/Suburban Nu�mber of Studies,- 261 10010, Sq. Ft. GLA: 327' Directional Distribution: 48,% enIteriing, 5�2% exiting Vahiit%la Tr"Ini ilanarnfinin nichr innn -Q,n rf rz i j& w %0 1 19 1 %F 0 %0 IN 1 5 to '%ww %0 1 11 %0 1 %AK 16 5 %0 1 11 10 %0 1 In %R ® %f %0 %1 a 5 No a '111I I&— #—"% Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 3. .691 2.04 Diata Plot and Equatioln (n -a C w CL 4,000 19 0 1,000 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GLA X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.74 Ln(X) + 2.89 1,500 2,000 - - - - Average Rate R 2= 0.82 a Mee CMAP 2050 Projections Letter 99 u4'%V's'tu%fF arm bilff°eri M m ret IY ��Intif"'plte �p,I��r ,''I'ym'C�I�� Metropol"itan C„��'�uVfl ��pII��p li uluv; VW��'�N41N�a11(.�) G' �0 c r �i �� IIIA �� t,„' Agency for Planning December 14, 2020 Elise Purguette Traffic Engineer Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara and Aboona, Inc. 9575 West Higgins Road Suite 400 Rosemont, IL 60018 Subject: Northwest Highway &Main Street IDOT Dear Ms. Purguette: In response to a request made on your behalf and dated December 10, 2020, we have developed year 2050 average daily traffic (ADT) projections for the subject location. ROAD SEGMENT Current Volumes Year 2050 ADT Northwest Hwy west of Main St 91900 12,700 Northwest Hwy east of Main St 10,300 12,400 Main St north of Northwest Hwy 13,800 17,100 Main St south of Northwest Hwy 15,400 191P400 Traffic projections are developed using existing ADT data provided in the request letter and the results from the June 2020 CMAP Travel Demand Analysis. The regional travel model uses CMAP 2050 socioeconomic projections and assumes the implementation of the ON TO 2050 Comprehensive Regional Plan for the Northeastern Illinois area. The provision of this data in support of your request does not constitute a CMAP endorsement of the proposed development or any subsequent developments. If you have any questions, please call me at (312) 386-8806. Sincerely, Jose Rodriguez, PTP, AICP Senior Planner, Research & Analysis cc: Quigley (I OT) \2020_TrafficForecast\MountProspect\ck-118-20\ck-118-20.docx 100 Level of Service Criteria 101 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA 102 Signalized Intersections Average Control LevelDelay Service Interpretation (seconds per vehicle) A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the <_ 10 green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 - 20 Level of Service A. C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles >20 - 35 are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear. Number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. D The volume -to -capacity ratio is high and either progression >35 - 55 is ineffective or the cycle length is too long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Progression is unfavorable. The volume -to -capacity ratio >55 - 80 is high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. F The volume -to -capacity ratio is very high, progression is >80.0 very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0-10 B >10-15 C > 15 - 25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. 102 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Weekday Morning Peak Hour Conditions 103 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street &Northwest Highway 1211512020 WA --IN. -*%v 'r *%.- -4\ -q/ Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 10 497 76 30 304 41 56 446 61 15 503 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 497 76 30 304 41 56 446 61 15 503 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%° Storage Length (ft) 125 0 120 0 40 0 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 130 120 40 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.980 0.982 0.982 0.999 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3452 0 1770 3222 0 1770 3458 0 1770 3535 0 Flt Permitted 0.535 0.156 0.363 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 989 3452 0 289 3222 0 671 3458 0 1744 3535 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 559 749 270 263 Travel Time (s) 12.7 17.0 6.1 6.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 15 15 8 11 17 17 11 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 8 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 603 0 32 363 0 59 533 0 16 534 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 6.5 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 8.8% 30.0%° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 46.3 36.7 57.4 46.7 86.9 92.9 7.1 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.22 0.34 0.27 0.51 0.55 0.04 0.26 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour 104 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)' Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 36.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 36.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour 105 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 t WIN v/c Ratio 0.04 0.81 0.14 0.41 0.09 0.28 0.22 0.57 Control Delay 42.4 73.0 42.8 54.6 0.6 0.3 84.9 57.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 42.4 73.0 42.8 54.6 0.6 0.8 84.9 57.0 LOS D E D D A A F E Approach Delay 72.5 53.7 0.8 57.8 Approach LOS E D A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 8 350 24 176 0 0 18 273 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 #480 58 257 mo 0 45 338 Internal Link Dist (ft) 479 669 190 183 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 120 40 50 Base Capacity (vph) 326 744 231 884 783 2121 109 935 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.03 0.81 0.14 0.41 0.08 0.52 0.15 0.57 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 45.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway C 02, *t *0 in 'I",4t -00 1, #2 We* '41\*110 6 t 08 (R) 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour 106 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 107 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 \0 - Lane Configurations + r + r 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 46 61 5 1 15 9 41 15 5 502 5 56 Future Volume (vph) 46 61 5 1 15 9 41 15 5 502 5 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 0 0 40 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 85 40 220 40 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.999 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 2000 1413 0 0 1718 2000 1397 1805 3340 0 1805 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.715 0.433 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 2000 1363 0 0 1276 2000 1364 823 3340 0 1787 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 276 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 406 456 119 Travel Time (s) 9.2 10.4 2.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 1 4 1 4 6 7 7 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 8% 0%Q 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 5 7 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 64 6 0 0 25 43 16 5 533 0 59 Turn Type Prot NA custom Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 56711 Permitted Phases 2 12 12 12 8 56711 Detector Phase 3 312 2 12 12 12 12 8 8 56711 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 21.2% 21.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 6.9 37.5 36.7 17.6 17.6 17.6 35.4 ; 35.4 80.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.47 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour 108 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 Oil 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) Lanevfonfigu rations t T+ 13.0 37.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 482 46 25 Future Volume (vph) 482 46 25 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 4.5 3.5 Storage Length (ft) 3.5 0 All -Red Time (s) Storage Lanes 1.5 0 1.5 Taper Length (ft) 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 Frt 0.981 Flt Protected Lead Lead Satd. Flow (prot) 3393 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 3393 0 0 Right Turn on Red None None Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 6 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 270 Travel Time (s) 6.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 7% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 581 0 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 12411 1 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 12411 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 123.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour 109 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & ProspectAvenue 12/15/2020 WIN Control Delay 1188 517 OO 080 888 663 572 721 234 Total Delay 1160 51.7 OO 890 088 883 572 721 234 Approach Delay 75.5 O8 72.0 Queue Length 50th Queue Length 95th (ft) #122 96 0 56 82 40 19 #400 m84 Internal Link Dist (ft) 326 376 39 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 40 Base Capacity (vph) 74 562 510 217 341 232 171 695 873 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 U O O U O 0 U U Reduced wtRatio 0.65 0.11 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.07 0.03 0.77 0.07 Area Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/cRatio: 0.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 85th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2:Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue C 02, *t *0 in 'I","", 4t —00 2,, We* '41 \*1106 114 t 08 (R) 20-229 Residential Development ' Mount Prospect 8vnnhro1OReport Existing AM Peak Hour 110 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 Control Delay 0.2 Total Delay 0.5 LOS A Approach Delay 2.6 Approach LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 190 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 2456 Starvation Cap Reductn 1144 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 111 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Wille Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Lane Configurations 1� 0 223 130 +T Y - 124 Traffic Vol, veh/h 92 4 0 71 2 21 Future Vol, veh/h 92 4 0 71 2 21 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 6 6 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 126 0 223 130 Stage 1 - - - - 124 - Stage 2 - - - - 99 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1473 - 770 925 Stage 1 - - - - 907 - Stage 2 - - - - 930 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1473 - 765 920 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 765 - Stage 1 - - - - 907 - Stage 2 - - - - 924 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.033 - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.1 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour 112 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Wille Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Lane Configurations 4� 0 0 10 0 0 135 4� 9 140 4� 79 Stage 1 4� - - - - Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 3 3 6 48 2 2 10 0 0 2 2 Future Vol, veh/h 11 3 3 6 48 2 2 10 0 0 2 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 2 2 0 5 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - p - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 50 0 25 7 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 77 0 0 10 0 0 135 135 9 140 136 79 Stage 1 - - - - - - 40 40 - 94 94 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 95 95 - 46 42 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.35 - - 7.1 6.67 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.67 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.67 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.425 - - 3.5 4.153 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1535 - - 1472 - - 841 729 1079 835 759 987 Stage 1 - - - - - - 980 833 - 918 821 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 917 788 - 973 864 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1528 - - 1469 - - 822 712 1076 807 741 979 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 822 712 - 807 741 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 967 822 - 903 812 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 903 779 - 945 853 - NO 91110 HCM Control Delay, s 4.8 0.8 10.1 9.3 HCM LOS B A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.01 - - 0.006 - - 0.007 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 9.3 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour 113 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Main Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations - 318 - 0 - 0 r - - - - - +++ ft Critical Hdwy Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 512 502 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 512 502 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 8 4 0 Conflicting Flow All - 318 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.9 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 - - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 684 0 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 - - 0 Stage 2 0 - 0 - - 0 Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 684 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.3 - HCM Lane LOS B 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing AM Peak Hour 114 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Existing Weekday Evening Peak Hour Conditions 115 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street &Northwest Highway 1211512020 WA --IN. -*%v 'r *%.- -4\ -q/ Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 10 416 61 51 578 76 61 527 30 25 539 5 Future Volume (vph) 10 416 61 51 578 76 61 527 30 25 539 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%° Storage Length (ft) 125 0 120 0 40 0 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 130 120 40 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.981 0.983 0.992 0.999 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3462 0 1770 3230 0 1770 3507 0 1770 3534 0 Flt Permitted 0.193 0.215 0.333 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 360 3462 0 399 3230 0 610 3507 0 1763 3534 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 559 749 270 263 Travel Time (s) 12.7 17.0 6.1 6.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 6 6 2 25 5 5 25 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 8 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 502 0 54 688 0 64 587 0 26 572 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 6.5 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 9.4% 30.0%° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 43.5 34.2 53.5 43.2 89.9 95.9 8.0 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.20 0.31 0.25 0.53 0.56 0.05 0.26 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 116 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 35.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 35.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 117 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 t WIN v/c Ratio 0.07 0.72 0.23 0.84 0.09 0.30 0.31 0.61 Control Delay 45.3 71.1 46.2 69.9 0.6 0.5 87.5 58.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 45.3 71.1 46.2 69.9 0.6 1.2 87.5 58.2 LOS D E D E A A F E Approach Delay 70.6 68.1 1.1 59.4 Approach LOS E E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 285 43 394 0 0 29 296 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 356 86 #596 mo 0 65 364 Internal Link Dist (ft) 479 669 190 183 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 120 40 50 Base Capacity (vph) 176 695 238 819 766 2133 119 935 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1130 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.72 0.23 0.84 0.08 0.59 0.22 0.61 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 49.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway C 02, *t *0 in 'I",4t -00 1, tO8 (R) \111106 \,Ill. ' 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 118 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 119 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 -A --IN. -*%v 'r X- .0- *%.- A) 4\ t Lane Configurations + r + r 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 46 51 5 1 20 11 71 35 2 10 537 5 Future Volume (vph) 46 51 5 1 20 11 71 35 2 10 537 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 85 40 220 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.050 0.999 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 2000 1413 0 0 1805 2000 1397 0 1805 3570 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.722 0.408 Satd. Flow (perm) 1788 2000 1358 0 0 1346 2000 1364 0 768 3570 0 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 276 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 406 456 119 Travel Time (s) 9.2 10.4 2.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 1 6 6 1 6 6 2 7 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 5 7 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 54 6 0 0 33 75 37 0 13 570 0 Turn Type Prot NA custom Perm Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 Permitted Phases 2 12 12 12 8 8 Detector Phase 3 312 2 12 12 12 12 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 20.6% 20.6% 20.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Max C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 6.9 41.3 34.2 21.4 21.4 21.4 34.5 34.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.24 0.20 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.20 0.20 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 120 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 51.0 Lane Configurations 37.0 0 14.0 Total Split (s) Traffic Volume (vph) 41 517 42 51 Future Volume (vph) 41 517 42 51 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0.0 0% 0.0 1.5 Storage Length (ft) 40 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 Total Lost Time (s) Taper Length (ft) 40 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 9.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 Lead -Lag Optimize? Frt 0.977 Flt Protected 0.950 C -Max None None Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3454 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.70 Satd. Flow (perm) 1788 3454 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 270 Travel Time (s) 6.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 2 6 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 642 0 0 Turn Type custom NA Protected Phases 56711 12411 1 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases 56711 Detector Phase 56711 12411 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 77.1 119.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.70 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 121 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.11 0.01 0.20 0.30 0.22 0.08 0.79 Control Delay 117.4 48.0 0.0 65.7 68.1 66.3 59.8 73.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 117.4 48.0 0.0 65.7 68.1 66.3 59.8 73.2 LOS F D A E E E E E Approach Delay 76.2 67.1 72.9 Approach LOS E E E Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 47 0 33 77 37 12 325 Queue Length 95th (ft) #122 83 0 67 127 75 35 #440 Internal Link Dist (ft) 326 376 39 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 Base Capacity (vph) 74 562 493 229 341 232 156 724 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.10 0.01 0.14 0.22 0.16 0.08 0.79 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 40.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue C 02, *t *0 in 'I",4t -00 1, tO8 (R) \111106 \,Ill. ' 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 122 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 Control Delay 21.1 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.3' Total Delay 21.1 0.5 LOS C A Approach Delay 1.8 Approach LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m57 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 190 Turn Bay Length (ft) 40 Base Capacity (vph) 846 2424 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 1067 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.05 0.47 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 123 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Wille Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Lane Configurations 1� 0 266 116 +T Y - 116 Traffic Vol, veh/h 92 5 5 127 5 11 Future Vol, veh/h 92 5 5 127 5 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 14 14 0 3 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 2 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 118 0 266 116 Stage 1 - - - - 116 - Stage 2 - - - - 150 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1483 - 727 942 Stage 1 - - - - 914 - Stage 2 - - - - 883 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1463 - 712 929 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 712 - Stage 1 - - - - 898 - Stage 2 - - - - 880 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - - 75 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 124 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Wille Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 3.2 Lane Configurations 68 4� 0 114 108 4� 110 108 4� Stage 1 - 4� - 24 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 5 0 6 50 0 0 11 0 0 5 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 5 0 6 50 0 0 11 0 0 5 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 6 6 0 5 5 0 1 1 0 5 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - p - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 68 0 0 12 0 0 114 108 13 110 108 73 Stage 1 - - - - - - 24 24 - 84 84 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 90 84 - 26 24 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1546 - - 1620 - - 868 786 1073 873 786 995 Stage 1 - - - - - - 999 879 - 929 829 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 922 829 - 997 879 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1539 - - 1511 - - 842 770 1066 850 770 986 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 842 770 - 850 770 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 989 870 - 921 821 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 900 821 - 976 870 - NO 91110 HCM Control Delay, s 3.7 0.8 9.8 9.2 HCM LOS A A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 0.004 - - 0.005 - - 0.015 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.3 0 - 7.2 0 - 9.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 125 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Main Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations - 286 - 0 - 0 r - - - - - - +++ ft Critical Hdwy Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 554 542 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 554 542 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 1 2 0 Conflicting Flow All - 286 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.9 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 - - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 717 0 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 - - 0 Stage 2 0 - 0 - - p Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 717 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.007 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.1 - HCM Lane LOS B 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Existing PM Peak Hour 126 Cgpaci y Analysis Summary Sheets No -Build Weekday Morning Peak Hour Conditions 127 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street &Northwest Highway 1211512020 WA --IN. -*%v 'r *%.- -4\ -q/ Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 18 519 79 31 318 52 58 479 64 24 554 7 Future Volume (vph) 18 519 79 31 318 52 58 479 64 24 554 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%° Storage Length (ft) 125 0 120 0 40 0 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 130 120 40 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.980 0.979 0.982 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3452 0 1770 3210 0 1770 3459 0 1770 3531 0 Flt Permitted 0.488 0.111 0.328 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 903 3452 0 206 3210 0 607 3459 0 1746 3531 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 559 749 270 263 Travel Time (s) 12.7 17.0 6.1 6.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 15 15 8 11 17 17 11 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 8 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 629 0 33 390 0 61 571 0 25 590 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 6.5 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 8.8% 30.0%° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 44.7 34.8 55.7 42.9 85.8 91.8 7.9 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.20 0.33 0.25 0.50 0.54 0.05 0.26 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build AM Peak Hour 128 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)' Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 36.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 36.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build AM Peak Hour 129 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 t WIN v/c Ratio 0.07 0.89 0.16 0.48 0.09 0.31 0.30 0.63 Control Delay 43.4 80.9 44.2 58.3 0.6 0.5 87.3 58.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.4 80.9 44.2 58.3 0.6 1.2 87.3 58.8 LOS D F D E A A F E Approach Delay 79.8 57.2 1.2 59.9 Approach LOS E E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 373 25 195 0 0 28 307 Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 #512 58 277 mo mo 63 377 Internal Link Dist (ft) 479 669 190 183 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 120 40 50 Base Capacity (vph) 296 707 209 810 772 2067 109 934 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1116 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.89 0.16 0.48 0.08 0.60 0.23 0.63 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 49.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway C 02, *t *0 in 'I",4t -00 1, #2 We* '41\*110 6 t 08 (R) 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build AM Peak Hour 130 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect No Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 131 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 \0 - Lane Configurations + r + r +T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 48 69 5 1 18 9 49 18 5 535 8 61 Future Volume (vph) 48 69 5 1 18 9 49 18 5 535 8 61 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 0 0 40 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 85 40 220 40 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.99 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 2000 1413 0 0 1727 2000 1397 1805 3337 0 1805 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.709 0.411 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 2000 1363 0 0 1272 2000 1364 781 3337 0 1788 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 276 1 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 406 456 119 Travel Time (s) 9.2 10.4 2.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 1 4 1 4 6 7 7 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 8% 0%Q 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 5 7 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 51 73 6 0 0 28 52 19 5 571 0 64 Turn Type Prot NA custom Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA custom Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 56711 Permitted Phases 2 12 12 12 8 56711 Detector Phase 3 312 2 12 12 12 12 8 8 56711 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 21.2% 21.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 39.2 34.8 19.2 19.2 19.2 32.6 32.6 79.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.23 0.20 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.47 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build AM Peak Hour 132 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 Oil 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) Lanevfonfigu rations t T+ 13.0 37.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 529 48 26 Future Volume (vph) 529 48 26 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 4.5 3.5 Storage Length (ft) 3.5 0 All -Red Time (s) Storage Lanes 1.5 0 1.5 Taper Length (ft) 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 Frt 0.982 Flt Protected Lead Lead Satd. Flow (prot) 3396 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 3396 0 0 Right Turn on Red None None Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 270 Travel Time (s) 6.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 7% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 635 0 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 12411 1 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 12411 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 121.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build AM Peak Hour 133 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & ProspectAvenue 12/15/2020 WIN Control Delay 1208 508 OO 078 881 653 584 834 222 Total Delay 1200 508 OO 870 081 853 584 834 222 Approach Delay 8 67.5 832 Queue Length 50th Queue Length 95th (ft) #133 106 0 60 95 46 19 #464 m83 Internal Link Dist (ft) 326 376 39 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 40 Base Capacity (vph) 74 576 498 216 341 232 149 641 853 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 U O O U O 0 U U Reduced wtRatio 0.68 0.13 0.01 0.13 0.15 0.08 0.03 0.89 0.00 Area Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/cRatio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 44.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Ca | 598% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 # 85th percentile volumeexceeds longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2:Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue C 02, *t *0 in 'I","", 4t —00 2,, We* '41 \*1106 114 t 08 (R) 20-229 Residential Development ' Mount Prospect 8vnnhro1OReport 134 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 Control Delay 0.2 Total Delay 0.5 LOS A Approach Delay 2.5 Approach LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) mo' Internal Link Dist (ft) 190 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 2425 Starvation Cap Reductn 1129 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect No Build AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 135 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Wille Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 1 Lane Configurations 1� 0 248 143 +T Y - 137 Traffic Vol, veh/h 102 4 0 80 2 21 Future Vol, veh/h 102 4 0 80 2 21 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 6 6 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 139 0 248 143 Stage 1 - - - - 137 - Stage 2 - - - - 111 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1457 - 745 910 Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 919 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1457 - 741 905 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 741 - Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 913 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.2 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build AM Peak Hour 136 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Wille Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Lane Configurations 4� 0 0 10 0 0 137 4� 9 142 4� 81 Stage 1 4� - - - - Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 3 3 6 50 2 2 10 0 0 2 2 Future Vol, veh/h 11 3 3 6 50 2 2 10 0 0 2 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 2 2 0 5 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - p - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 50 0 25 7 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 79 0 0 10 0 0 137 137 9 142 138 81 Stage 1 - - - - - - 40 40 - 96' 96 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 97 97 - 46 42 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.35 - - 7.1 6.67 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.67 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.67 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.425 - - 3.5 4.153 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1532 - - 1472 - - 838 727 1079 832 757 985 Stage 1 - - - - - - 980 833 - 916 819 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 914 786 - 973 864 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1525 - - 1469 - - 819 710 1076 804 739 978 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 819 710 - 804 739 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 967 822 - 901 810 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 900 777 - 945 853 - W 01 IN HCM Control Delay, s 4.8 0.8 10.1 9.3 HCM LOS B A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 0.01 - - 0.006 - - 0.007 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 9.3 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build AM Peak Hour 137 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Main Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations - 350 - 0 - 0 r - - - - - - +++ ft Critical Hdwy Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 548 552 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 0 548 552 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 8 4 0 Conflicting Flow All - 350 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.9 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 - - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 652 0 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 - - 0 Stage 2 0 - 0 - - p Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 652 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.6 - HCM Lane LOS B 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build AM Peak Hour 138 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets No -Build Weekday Evening Peak Hour Conditions 139 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street &Northwest Highway 1211512020 WA --IN. -*%v 'r *%.- -4\ -q/ Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 18 434 64 53 606 91 64 578 31 33 588 7 Future Volume (vph) 18 434 64 53 606 91 64 578 31 33 588 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%° Storage Length (ft) 125 0 120 0 40 0 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 130 120 40 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.981 0.980 0.992 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3462 0 1770 3219 0 1770 3507 0 1770 3530 0 Flt Permitted 0.131 0.185 0.285 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 244 3462 0 343 3219 0 523 3507 0 1763 3530 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 559 749 270 263 Travel Time (s) 12.7 17.0 6.1 6.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 6 6 2 25 5 5 25 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 8 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 524 0 56 734 0 67 641 0 35 626 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 6.5 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 9.4% 30.0%° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 42.6 33.0 51.5 41.1 90.9 96.9 8.7 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.19 0.30 0.24 0.53 0.57 0.05 0.26 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 140 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 35.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 35.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 141 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 t v/c Ratio 0.15 0.78 0.26 0.94 0.10 0.32 0.39 0.67 Control Delay 47.5 74.6 47.7 82.5 1.2 0.7 89.7 60.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.5 74.6 47.7 82.5 1.2 1.8 89.7 60.0 LOS D E D F A A F E Approach Delay 73.6 80.0 1.8 61.6 Approach LOS E F A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 300 46 -472 0 0 38 331 Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 372 88 #661 mO m17 80 403 Internal Link Dist (ft) 479 669 190 183 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 120 40 50 Base Capacity (vph) 149 671 217 778 760 2121 119 934 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1176 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.78 0.26 0.94 0.09 0.68 0.29 0.67 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 53.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway C 02, *t *0 in 'I",4t -00 1, tO8 (R) \111106 \,Ill. ' 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 142 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect No Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 143 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 -A --IN. -*%v 'r X- .0- *%.- A) 4\ t Lane Configurations + r + r 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 48 69 5 1 23 11 80 39 2 10 586 13 Future Volume (vph) 48 69 5 1 23 11 80 39 2 10 586 13 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 85 40 220 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.997 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 2000 1413 0 0 1805 2000 1397 0 1805 3561 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.709 0.390 Satd. Flow (perm) 1788 2000 1358 0 0 1322 2000 1364 0 734 3561 0 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 276 1 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 406 456 119 Travel Time (s) 9.2 10.4 2.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 1 6 6 1 6 6 2 7 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 5 7 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 51 73 6 0 0 36 84 41 0 13 631 0 Turn Type Prot NA custom Perm Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 Permitted Phases 2 12 12 12 8 8 Detector Phase 3 312 2 12 12 12 12 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 20.6% 20.6% 20.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Max C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 43.0 33.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 33.8 33.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.25 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.20 0.20 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 144 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Oil Lane Configurations 1.0 0 6.5 51.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 51 557 44 53 Future Volume (vph) 51 557 44 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3.5 0% 3.5 4.5 Storage Length (ft) 40 1.5 0 1.5 Storage Lanes 1 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0 Taper Length (ft) 40 Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 9.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 Lead Frt Lead 0.978 Lead -Lag Optimize? Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3457 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Act Effct Green (s) 76.1 117.5 Satd. Flow (perm) 1790 3457 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 270 Travel Time (s) 6.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 2 6 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 688 0 0 Turn Type custom NA Protected Phases 56711 12411 1 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases 56711 Detector Phase 56711 12411 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 76.1 117.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.69 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 145 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 WIN v/c Ratio 0.69 0.14 0.01 0.20 0.31 0.22 0.09 0.89 Control Delay 120.8 48.0 0.0 65.0 67.4 65.6 60.8 81.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 120.8 48.0 0.0 65.0 67.4 65.6 60.8 81.1 LOS F D A E E E E F Approach Delay 74.3 66.4 80.7 Approach LOS E E F Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 62 0 35 84 41 12 370 Queue Length 95th (ft) #133 106 0 73 139 80 36 #529 Internal Link Dist (ft) 326 376 39 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 Base Capacity (vph) 74 576 485 225 341 232 146 709 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.13 0.01 0.16 0.25 0.18 0.09 0.89 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 44.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 1, C 02, 1, tO8 (R) \111106 \,Ill. ' 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 146 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 Control Delay 20.3 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.3' Total Delay 20.3 0.6 LOS C A Approach Delay 2.0 Approach LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m65 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 190 Turn Bay Length (ft) 40 Base Capacity (vph) 824 2392 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 1037 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.51 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect No Build PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 147 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Wille Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Lane Configurations 1� 0 298 137 +T Y - 137 Traffic Vol, veh/h 112 5 5 138 5 11 Future Vol, veh/h 112 5 5 138 5 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 14 14 0 3 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 2 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 139 0 298 137 Stage 1 - - - - 137 - Stage 2 - - - - 161 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1457 - 698 917 Stage 1 - - - - 895 - Stage 2 - - - - 873 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1438 - 684 905 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 684 - Stage 1 - - - - 880 - Stage 2 - - - - 870 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 - - 75 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 148 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Wille Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Lane Configurations 71 4� 0 117 111 4� 113 111 4� Stage 1 - 4� - 24 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 5 0 6 52 0 0 11 0 0 5 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 5 0 6 52 0 0 11 0 0 5 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 6 6 0 5 5 0 1 1 0 5 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - p - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 71 0 0 12 0 0 117 111 13 113 111 76 Stage 1 - - - - - - 24 24 - 87 87 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 93 87 - 26 24 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1542 - - 1620 - - 864 783 1073 869 783 991 Stage 1 - - - - - - 999 879 - 926 827 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 919 827 - 997 879 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1535 - - 1511 - - 838 767 1066 846 767 982 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 838 767 - 846 767 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 989 870 - 918 819 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 897 819 - 976 870 - NO 91110 HCM Control Delay, s 3.7 0.7 9.8 9.2 HCM LOS A A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 0.004 - - 0.005 - - 0.015 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.4 0 - 7.2 0 - 9.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 149 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Main Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 0 Lane Configurations - 308 - 0 - 0 r - - - - - - +++ ft Critical Hdwy Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 611 585 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 611 585 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 1 2 0 Conflicting Flow All - 308 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.9 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 - - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 694 0 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 - - 0 Stage 2 0 - 0 - - p Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 694 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.008 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.2 - HCM Lane LOS B 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report No Build PM Peak Hour 150 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Projected Weekday Morning Peak Hour Conditions 151 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street &Northwest Highway 1211512020 WA --IN. -*%v 'r *%.- -4\ -q/ Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 18 519 79 31 318 52 58 488 64 24 559 7 Future Volume (vph) 18 519 79 31 318 52 58 488 64 24 559 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%° Storage Length (ft) 125 0 120 0 40 0 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 130 120 40 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.980 0.979 0.983 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3452 0 1770 3210 0 1770 3462 0 1770 3531 0 Flt Permitted 0.481 0.111 0.323 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 890 3452 0 206 3210 0 598 3462 0 1746 3531 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 559 749 270 263 Travel Time (s) 12.7 17.0 6.1 6.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 15 15 8 11 17 17 11 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 8 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 629 0 33 390 0 61 581 0 25 595 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 6.5 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 8.8% 30.0%° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 44.7 34.8 55.3 42.5 86.2 92.2 7.9 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.20 0.33 0.25 0.51 0.54 0.05 0.26 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 152 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)' Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 36.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 36.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 153 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 t WIN v/c Ratio 0.07 0.89 0.16 0.49 0.09 0.31 0.30 0.64 Control Delay 43.7 81.0 44.6 58.8 0.6 0.5 87.3 58.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.7 81.0 44.6 58.8 0.6 1.3 87.3 58.9 LOS D F D E A A F E Approach Delay 79.9 57.7 1.2 60.1 Approach LOS E E A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 373 25 196 0 0 28 311 Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 #512 58 277 mo mo 63 381 Internal Link Dist (ft) 479 669 190 183 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 120 40 50 Base Capacity (vph) 294 706 206 803 770 2069 109 934 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1129 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.89 0.16 0.49 0.08 0.62 0.23 0.64 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 49.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway C 02, *t *0 in 'I",4t -00 1, #2 We* '41\*110 6 t 08 (R) 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 154 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 155 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 -A --IN. -*%v 'r X- .0- *%.- A) 4\ t Lane Configurations + r + r 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 57 71 5 1 18 10 49 18 4 5 535 8 Future Volume (vph) 57 71 5 1 18 10 49 18 4 5 535 8 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 85 40 220 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.650 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 2000 1413 0 0 1717 2000 1397 0 1805 3337 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.708 0.409 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 2000 1363 0 0 1263 2000 1364 0 773 3337 0 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 276 1 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 406 456 119 Travel Time (s) 9.2 10.4 2.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 1 4 1 4 6 4 7 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8%° 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 5 7 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 60 75 6 0 0 30 52 19 0 9 571 0 Turn Type Prot NA custom Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 Permitted Phases 2 12 12 12 8 Detector Phase 3 312 2 12 12 12 12 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 21.2% 21.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 39.6 34.8 19.6 19.6 19.6 32.6 32.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.23 0.20 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.19 0.19 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 156 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Oil Lane Configurations 1.0 0 6.5 51.0 Traffic Volume (vph) 61 529 53 26 Future Volume (vph) 61 529 53 26 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1000 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3.5 0% 3.5 4.5 Storage Length (ft) 40 1.5 0 1.5 Storage Lanes 1 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0 Taper Length (ft) 40 Total Lost Time (s) Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 9.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 Lead Frt Lead 0.981 Lead -Lag Optimize? Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3392 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Act Effct Green (s) 78.8 120.9 Satd. Flow (perm) 1788 3392 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 270 Travel Time (s) 6.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 4 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 0%° 4% 7% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 640 0 0 Turn Type custom NA Protected Phases 56711 12411 1 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases 56711 Detector Phase 56711 12411 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 30%° 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 78.8 120.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.71 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 157 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & ProspectAvenue 12/15/2020 WIN Control Delay 1392 508 OO 078 676 648 590 834 Total Delay 1392 508 OO 870 078 849 590 834 Approach Delay 001 67.1 830 Queue Length 50th Queue Length 95th (ft) #161 108 0 63 95 46 28 #464 Internal Link Dist (ft) 326 376 39 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 Base Capacity (vph) 74 576 498 215 341 232 148 641 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 U O O U O U O Reduced wtRatio 0.81 0.13 0.01 0.14 0.15 0.08 0.00 0.89 Area Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/cRatio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 45.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Ca | 14% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 85th percentile volumeexceeds longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2:Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue C 02, *t *0 in 'I","", 4t —00 2,, We* '41 \*1106 114 t 08 (R) 20-229 Residential Development ' Mount Prospect 8vnnhro1OReport Projected ANPeak Hour 158 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 Control Delay 22.1 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.3' Total Delay 22.1 0.6 LOS C A Approach Delay 2.5 Approach LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m81 m0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 190 Turn Bay Length (ft) 40 Base Capacity (vph) 849 2414 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 1113' Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.49 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Projected AM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 159 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Wille Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Lane Configurations 1� 0 249 144 +T Y - 138 Traffic Vol, veh/h 102 5 0 80 3 32 Future Vol, veh/h 102 5 0 80 3 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 6 6 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 3 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 141 0 249 144 Stage 1 - - - - 138 - Stage 2 - - - - 111 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1455 - 744 909 Stage 1 - - - - 894 - Stage 2 - - - - 919 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1455 - 740 904 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 740 - Stage 1 - - - - 894 - Stage 2 - - - - 913 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 - - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 160 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Wille Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Lane Configurations 4� 0 0 10 0 0 137 4� 9 143 4� 81 Stage 1 4� - - - - Traffic Vol, veh/h 11 3 3 6 50 2 2 11 0 0 3 2 Future Vol, veh/h 11 3 3 6 50 2 2 11 0 0 3 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 2 2 0 5 3 0 1 1 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - p - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 50 0 25 7 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 79 0 0 10 0 0 137 137 9 143 138 81 Stage 1 - - - - - - 40 40 - 96' 96 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 97 97 - 47 42 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.35 - - 7.1 6.67 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.67 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.67 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.425 - - 3.5 4.153 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1532 - - 1472 - - 838 727 1079 831 757 985 Stage 1 - - - - - - 980 833 - 916 819 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 914 786 - 972 864 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1525 - - 1469 - - 817 710 1076 802 739 978 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 817 710 - 802 739 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 967 822 - 901 810 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 898 777 - 942 853 - W 01 IN HCM Control Delay, s 4.8 0.8 10.1 9.4 HCM LOS B A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.01 - - 0.006 - - 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 9.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 161 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Main Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations - 350 - 0 - 0 r - - - - - - +++ ft Critical Hdwy Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 12 0 552 552 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 12 0 552 552 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 8 4 0 Conflicting Flow All - 350 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.9 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 - - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 652 0 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 - - 0 Stage 2 0 - 0 - - p Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 652 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.023 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.7 - HCM Lane LOS B 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour HCM 6th TWSC 6: Wille Street & Proposed Full Movement Access Drive 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Lane Configurations Y 25 1� Stage 1 +T Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 12 23 1 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 1 12 23 1 1 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 17 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 31 25 0 0 25 0 Stage 1 25 - - - - - Stage 2 6 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 988 1057 - - 1603 - Stage 1 1003 - - - - - Stage 2 1022 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 987 1057 - - 1603 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 987 - - - - - Stage 1 1002 - - - - - Stage 2 1022 - - - - - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.013 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.5 72 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 163 HCM 6th TWSC 7: Evergreen Avenue & Proposed Full Movement Access Drive 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 1 Lane Configurations 72 0 +' 1� Stage 1 Y - - 67 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 57 10 9 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 57 10 9 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 50 7 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 72 0 - 0 70 67 Stage 1 - - - - 67 - Stage 2 - - - - 3 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1541 - - - 939 1002 Stage 1 - - - - 961 - Stage 2 - - - - 1025 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1541 - - - 939 1002 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 939 - Stage 1 - - - - 961 - Stage 2 - - - - 1025 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.01 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 8.9 HCM Lane LOS A - - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected AM Peak Hour 164 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Projected Weekday Evening Peak Hour Conditions 165 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street &Northwest Highway 1211512020 WA --IN. -*%v 'r *%.- -4\ -q/ Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 18 434 64 53 606 91 64 589 31 33 601 7 Future Volume (vph) 18 434 64 53 606 91 64 589 31 33 601 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0%° Storage Length (ft) 125 0 120 0 40 0 50 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 130 120 40 120 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.981 0.980 0.992 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3462 0 1770 3219 0 1770 3507 0 1770 3530 0 Flt Permitted 0.129 0.184 0.271 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 240 3462 0 342 3219 0 498 3507 0 1763 3530 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 559 749 270 263 Travel Time (s) 12.7 17.0 6.1 6.0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 6 6 2 25 5 5 25 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 8 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 524 0 56 734 0 67 653 0 35 640 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 3 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 311 12 811 12 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 6.5 37.0 15.0 51.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 7.6% 21.8% 9.4% 30.0%° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 42.6 32.9 51.3 40.9 91.1 97.1 8.7 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.19 0.30 0.24 0.54 0.57 0.05 0.26 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 166 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph)' Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade (%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Growth Factor Bus Blockages (#/hr) Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) Shared Lane Traffic Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases 3 8 11 12 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 1.0 3.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 35.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 35.0 14.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 8% 21% 8% 25% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 167 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 t WIN v/c Ratio 0.15 0.78 0.26 0.95 0.10 0.33 0.39 0.69 Control Delay 47.7 74.7 47.9 83.2 1.3 0.7 89.7 60.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.7 74.7 47.9 83.2 1.3 1.9 89.7 60.6 LOS D E D F A A F E Approach Delay 73.8 80.7 1.9 62.1 Approach LOS E F A E Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 300 46 -483 0 0 38 340 Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 372 88 #661 mO m18 80 413 Internal Link Dist (ft) 479 669 190 183 Turn Bay Length (ft) 125 120 40 50 Base Capacity (vph) 149 670 215 774 754 2121 119 934 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 1187 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.13 0.78 0.26 0.95 0.09 0.70 0.29 0.69 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.95 Intersection Signal Delay: 53.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway C 02, *t *0 in 'I",4t -00 1, tO8 (R) \111106 \,Ill. ' 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 168 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main Street & Northwest Highway 12/15/2020 Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reduct Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Projected PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 169 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 -A --IN. -*%v 'r X- .0- *%.- A) 4\ t Lane Configurations + r + r 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 59 72 5 1 23 14 80 39 15 10 586 13 Future Volume (vph) 59 72 5 1 23 14 80 39 15 10 586 13 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 85 40 220 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.997 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 2000 1413 0 0 1805 2000 1397 0 1805 3561 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.708 0.385 Satd. Flow (perm) 1788 2000 1358 0 0 1320 2000 1364 0 725 3561 0 Right Turn on Red Yes No Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 276 1 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 406 456 119 Travel Time (s) 9.2 10.4 2.7 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 1 6 6 1 6 6 2 7 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%°) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) 5 7 Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 62 76 6 0 0 39 84 41 0 27 631 0 Turn Type Prot NA custom Perm Perm NA Perm Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 3 312 12 8 Permitted Phases 2 12 12 12 8 8 Detector Phase 3 312 2 12 12 12 12 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 Minimum Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 37.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 7.6% 21.8% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 24.7% 20.6% 20.6% 20.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None None None None C -Max C -Max C -Max Act Effct Green (s) 7.0 43.2 32.9 23.2 23.2 23.2 33.8 33.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.25 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.20 0.20 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 170 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 51.0 Lane Configurations 37.0 0 14.0 Total Split (s) Traffic Volume (vph) 51 557 57 53 Future Volume (vph) 51 557 57 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0.0 0% 0.0 1.5 Storage Length (ft) 40 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 Total Lost Time (s) Taper Length (ft) 40 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 9.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 Lead -Lag Optimize? Frt 0.975 Flt Protected 0.950 C -Max None None Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 3446 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.69 Satd. Flow (perm) 1790 3446 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 Link Speed (mph) 30 Link Distance (ft) 270 Travel Time (s) 6.1 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 2 6 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 702 0 0 Turn Type custom NA Protected Phases 56711 12411 1 4 5 6 7 11 Permitted Phases 56711 Detector Phase 56711 12411 Minimum Initial (s) 3.0 15.0 3.0 15.0 3.0 1.0 Minimum Split (s) 6.5 51.0 13.0 37.0 15.0 14.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 51.0 13.0 37.0 16.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 8% 30% 8% 22% 9% 8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 8.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C -Max None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 75.9 117.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.69 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 171 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.15 0.01 0.22 0.31 0.22 0.19 0.89 Control Delay 144.2 48.0 0.0 65.4 67.2 65.4 63.8 81.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 144.2 48.0 0.0 65.4 67.2 65.4 63.8 81.1 LOS F D A E E E E F Approach Delay 87.4 66.3 80.4 Approach LOS F E F Queue Length 50th (ft) 70 64 0 38 84 40 26 370 Queue Length 95th (ft) #168 109 0 77 139 80 60 #529 Internal Link Dist (ft) 326 376 39 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 50 60 60 Base Capacity (vph) 74 576 485 225 341 232 144 709 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.84 0.13 0.01 0.17 0.25 0.18 0.19 0.89 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green Natural Cycle: 170 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.95 Intersection Signal Delay: 45.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 2: Evergreen Avenue & Main Street & Prospect Avenue C 02, *t *0 in 'I",4t -00 1, tO8 (R) \111106 \,Ill. ' 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 172 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2: Evergreen Avenue &Main Street &Prospect Avenue 1211512020 Control Delay 20.3 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.3' Total Delay 20.3 0.6 LOS C A Approach Delay 2.0 Approach LOS A Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m65 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 190 Turn Bay Length (ft) 40 Base Capacity (vph) 822 2380 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 1018' Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.52 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Projected PM Peak Hour Synchro 10 Report 173 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Wille Street & Prospect Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Lane Configurations 1� 0 299 138 +T Y - 138 Traffic Vol, veh/h 112 7 5 138 6 25 Future Vol, veh/h 112 7 5 138 6 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 14 14 0 3 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 2 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 142 0 299 138 Stage 1 - - - - 138 - Stage 2 - - - - 161 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1453 - 697 916 Stage 1 - - - - 894 - Stage 2 - - - - 873 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1434 - 683 904 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 683 - Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 870 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 - - 75 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 174 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Wille Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Lane Configurations 71 4� 0 119 111 4� 114 111 4� Stage 1 - 4� - 24 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 5 0 6 52 0 0 13 0 0 7 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 5 0 6 52 0 0 13 0 0 7 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 5 0 6 6 0 5 5 0 1 1 0 5 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - p - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 79 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 71 0 0 12 0 0 119 111 13 114 111 76 Stage 1 - - - - - - 24 24 - 87 87 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 95 87 - 27 24 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1542 - - 1620 - - 861 783 1073 868 783 991 Stage 1 - - - - - - 999 879 - 926 827 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 917 827 - 996 879 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1535 - - 1511 - - 833 767 1066 843 767 982 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - 833 767 - 843 767 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 989 870 - 918 819 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 892 819 - 972 870 - W 01 IN HCM Control Delay, s 3.7 0.7 9.8 9.3 HCM LOS A A HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 0.004 - - 0.005 - - 0.018 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 7.4 0 - 7.2 0 - 9.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 175 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Main Street & Evergreen Avenue 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Lane Configurations - 308 - 0 - 0 r - - - - - - +++ ft Critical Hdwy Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 16 0 624 585 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 16 0 624 585 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 1 2 0 Conflicting Flow All - 308 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 6.9 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.3 - - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 694 0 - - 0 Stage 1 0 - 0 - - 0 Stage 2 0 - 0 - - p Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 694 - - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - HCM LOS B HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.024 - HCM Control Delay (s) - 10.3 - HCM Lane LOS B 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 176 HCM 6th TWSC 6: Wille Street & Proposed Full Movement Access Drive 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Lane Configurations Y 18 1� Stage 1 18 +T Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 15 16 2 2 10 Future Vol, veh/h 2 15 16 2 2 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 33 18 0 0 19 0 Stage 1 18 - - - - - Stage 2 15 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 41 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 986 1066 - - 1611 - Stage 1 1010 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 985 1066 - - 1611 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 985 - - - - - Stage 1 1009 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.017 0.001 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.5 72 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 177 HCM 6th TWSC 7: Evergreen Avenue & Proposed Full Movement Access Drive 12/15/2020 Int Delay, s/veh 1 Lane Configurations 92 0 +' 1� Stage 1 Y - - 77 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 57 29 11 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 57 29 11 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Nene - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Conflicting Flow All 92 0 - 0 82 77 Stage 1 - - - - 77 - Stage 2 - - - - 5 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - - 64 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1515 - - - 925 990 Stage 1 - - - - 951 - Stage 2 - - - - 1023 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1515 - - - 925 990 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 925 - Stage 1 - - - - 951 - Stage 2 - - - - 1023 - HCM LOS A HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - - 8.9 HCM Lane LOS A - - A 20-229 Residential Development - Mount Prospect Synchro 10 Report Projected PM Peak Hour 178 Parking Ratios of Similar Developments 179 Table A PARKING RATIOS OF APARTMENT DEVELOPMENTS (NEAR PUBLIC TRANSIT) Development Parking- . Ratio River 595 Des Plaines 60 104 1.73 Walker & Parker Clarendon Hills 42 42 1.00 Forest & Gilbert Downers Grove 89 102 1.15 Adriatic Grove Downers Grove 48 64 1.33 Residences at the Grove Downers Grove 294 345 1.17 100 North Addison Elmhurst 165 199 1.21 1717 Ridge Evanston 175 205 1.17 AMLI Evanston Evanston 214 312 1.46 Central Station Evanston 80 80 1.00 E2 Evanston 356 3 71 1.04 The Reserve at Evanston Evanston 195 219 1.12 Midtown Square Glenview 138 160 1.16 The Reserve at Glenview Glenview 239 333 1.3 9 Uptown La Grange La Grange 254 336 1.32 Ninety7Fifty on the Park Orland Park 295 300 1.02 Wheaton 121 Wheaton 306 400 1.31 Average 184 223 1.22 180 Shallcross, Jason From: Tom Zander <tomzander@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 12:51 PM To: Shallcross, Jason Subject: Prospect Place redevelopment P&Z Commissioners, The Mount Prospect Downtown Merchants Association, (MPDMA) would like to encourage you and your fellow commission members to move forward with the Prospect Place redevelopment in its current configuration. This development appears to fall in line with VOMP's Strategic Plan. The members of the MPDMA are business owners/managers, but many of us live in the area as well and we believe these developments are vital to the future health of our downtown. We would also like to point out the developer is a longtime Mount Prospect resident. It could be worth noting he's investing in his home town a second time, particularly given present economic challenges and COVID impact on commercial activity. Of course, there are many details to work out before it is approved, but we would hope it can be approved without change to its height, stories and footprint. This site is one of the few downtown sites that minimally affects surrounding residents and should be as grand as they are willing to build it. We applaud the commission for its commitment to downtown redevelopment amidst significant pushback, which often lacks consideration on how the project can benefit our community as a whole. We would assume that redevelopment is among the most controversial of your duties as P&Z Commissioners, and we want to show our support for your courageous service to not just those who attend the meetings, but to all the residents of Mount Prospect. Thank you, The Executive Board of the MPDMA Tom Zander, President 181 Shallcross, Jason From: Tony Argenio <tonyargenio49@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 11:45 AM To: Shallcross, Jason Subject: Prospect Avenue Development I have two concerns regarding the proposed project. My first concern is population density for the site. I reviewed the materials provided and did not notice a projection for the number of people that will occupy the building. I apologize if I missed it. Using my own estimate of 125 residents on .82 acres yields 152 people per acre. This is well over the 100 per acre guideline that I understand is generally used. In my opinion, one lesson learned during this pandemic is that areas of high density are impacted much more heavily. I am concerned about the continued development of multi unit buildings and how it will strain the village's and the community's ability to manage future problems My second concern is parking. Mainly parking for the commercial units. It appears to me that there will be inadequate parking for customers, especially restaurants. This will make it less desirable for potential tenants, resulting in more vacant property in the village. Thank you for your help in bringing my concerns to the zoning board. 182 Shallcross, Jason From: Christy Watychowicz <christy@lawmjw.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 1:46 PM To: Shallcross, Jason Subject: Prospect & 83 development - resident input Hi Jason, understand that if we would like send communication for the P&Z Commission to consider, we should send that through you - so if you are able to provide my comments below to the P&Z Commission, it would be much appreciated. Thank you! To the Members of Mount Prospect's Planning & Zoning Commission: I'm writing to you both as a resident and someone who helps run a business, both within blocks of the proposed new development at Prospect & 83. When we picked our home within walking distance to the downtown, we did so with the hope that the downtown was blossoming. A few months after moving to Mount Prospect, we walked to Oberweis one night and called about an office space for lease sign we saw across the street. When we outgrew that office, we purposefully limited our search to buildings for sale in downtown MP and built out an existing, long -outdated space. So many other local businesses have a similar story of supporting the Village, taking pride in it and growing the downtown. have lived in Mount Prospect for 18 years this year, and there are spaces in the current buildings at Prospect & 83 that have been vacant for the vast majority of that period. To say "it's time" is an understatement for me. I've walked past that block countless times and thought how sad that it went for so many years, decades, without enough attention. When Mike Cassady joined the Village, I remember him speaking somewhere and the phrase that stuck with me was "seven cranes." He wanted to see seven cranes raised for redevelopment projects, that was his goal. I think we're making good headway, and this project would be a beautiful gateway to the southern entrance into our downtown. We are excited to be finally getting a long -requested grocery store! Despite the rough year this pandemic has posed, I see the pieces falling in the right places here. It seems to me that there will always be noise of criticism, it's become very easy to do in the social media age. What would like to see is that our board will rise above that noise, look to our future, and help this project move forward so that we can continue to populate our downtown. Thank you all for your time and dedication to the Village, I appreciate you considering my comments. Sincerely, Christy Watychowicz, resident 183 Shallcross, Jason From: Allison Bull <akbu112005@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2021 2:40 PM To: Shallcross, Jason Subject: Old Sahara windows building (prospect, evergreen and wille) Dear Jason, I am writing you in regards to the potential development of the old Sahara Windows building at Prospect ave, Evergreen and Wille st. My husband and I have owned our house on the 300 block of south Wille st for over 9 years. The 200 and 300 south blocks of Wille st. form a quiet residential neighborhood. There are many young families on our street and I roughly estimate more than 35 children living on these two blocks alone. We have very little traffic on our street currently and have concerns regarding potential development of the property listed above. What is the density of the proposed building? How will traffic patterns be designed to and from the building? What is the estimated impact to Wille and Milburn street traffic? We appreciate your efforts in invigorating the downtown district of Mount Prospect and would request that any such development consider the impact on traffic patterns and residential neighborhood on Wille street, immediately south of said property. Thank you Allison Bull i 184 Shallcross, Jason From: Chad Busse <bussecg@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2021 1:33 PM To: Shallcross, Jason Subject: Prospect Place Hi Jason, After watching the P&Z meeting on Prospect Place redevelopment, I have a few thoughts that I want to share. These are not necessary to be read but moreso to provide context. As I understand, these types of developments fall in line with what has been laid out in our strategic plan. These types of developments also support current planning trends that are shared at places like CMAP? (this is accurate, right?) With that in mind, I think the public in general needs to understand that this type of development is brought forward because its viable and it furthers the long term planning of the downtown. As a resident in the adjacent neighborhood and business owner down the street, I see both the short term and long term benefits of these added residents in our downtown. I heard some push back regarding some of the normal items we hear; parking, students, appearance, heights etc. The impact on the school concern is multifaceted and sole responsibility should not fall on the village (or p&z). At what point is the school district responsible for forecasting and planning population growth and building to accommodate? How silly does it sound to reject a redevelopment plan based on this critique? Long term sustainability would require more people to choose Mount Prospect as their home. As a group, many of the business owners I talk to are absolutely sick and tired of hearing residents speak about the village as if no planning is involved, as we know the circumstances are quite the opposite. I think more needs to be said about how TOD's are desirable and how they fit into our strategic plan. I think the objections that are surfacing are honest and legitimate but no reason to re.ect or force a developer to scale down a plan. Just my opinion. Thanks for the work you do, Chad Busse 185 Shallcross, Jason From: Anna Huberty <annahuberty1@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 4:09 PM To: Shallcross, Jason; Cooney, Bill; Anna Huberty Subject: Prospect Place Hi Jason and Bill, I'd like this below note to be shared with the zoning and planning board in advance of Thursday's meeting. Can you also share details of how to register for attending the meeting again? Thanks, Anna Dear Board Members, Thank you for including the neighbors in the planning for the Prospect Place Development and listening to our concerns. I hope that by working together we're able to build a beautiful development that helps the village and minimally disrupts the neighborhood. I hope that we can reduce the scope of the current development to solve the parking and traffic issues as well as make it fit better in our residential neighborhood. I've lived on the 200 block of South Wille Street (approximately a half block from the proposed development) for the past 10 and a half years. The 200 and 300 block of South Wille street is a residential neighborhood of single family homes adjacent to downtown Mt. Prospect. The blocks and surrounding area are full of families with more than 30 children living just on this stretch of Wille Street alone. Adding 80 apartment units will more than double the current population on the 200 and 300 blocks of South Wille street causing traffic congestion, clogging our streets with parking, and will turn our quiet neighborhood street into a pass through street and major thoroughfare. To date, we have 78 neighbors who have signed a petition against the current scope of the proposed development. To view this, please visit: , tt p....m..... .... ... n .... ® ............. ...................p............. ...0........................., Two major issues arise when evaluating the current plans for this development: Traffic Congestion and a Lack of Self - Contained Parking 1. Traffic Congestion: I have reviewed the current traffic study in great detail and find the conclusions made to be improbable. It's improbable to believe that adding over 100 people living on the block PLUS the people visiting retail storefronts PLUS people visiting the residents PLUS deliveries (UPS, FedEx, Amazon, DoorDash, etc) will only increase traffic on South Wille Street by 13 cars in the morning and 12 in the evening as the study states. If there are 80 units and the total parking needed (Per the study) is 104 spots, the study is saying that only 12% of the building will use their cars to go to/from work during peak times, which seems extremely low. I see no adequate comparison in the study that shows adding 100+ people living in a residential area will have no impact on traffic and congestion. Adding a significant level of traffic to the narrow surrounding streets is not safe for the residents and for the children living there. I would like to ask for the following considerations to be made before moving forward: a. That the village completes an independent traffic study that is not funded or supported in any way by the petitioning party to avoid any bias. b. The current design states that current parking exists on Evergreen between Main Street and Wille Street, but is just not striped as such. Parking on this street is unusable because the street is too narrow. Anyone who risks parking there (which if you do another study to observe, you'll never see) will lose a side view mirror or worse. I ask that the street parking on Evergreen is double checked and 186 measured to ensure it is actually usable. If it is too narrow I ask that the design be reevaluated to widen the street further into the development to make way for parking there. c. 4 way stops signs added to the following intersections to help with people speeding down S. Wille (which is already a concern which has been brought to the Mayor on previous occasions): i. Evergreen and South Wille ii. South Wille and West Milburn d. No left turn from 83/Main Street onto Wille Street heading North (similar to the restriction already put in for Pine Street on 83/Main) to reduce traffic cutting up Wille Street. e. No parking from the development be allowed on the 200 and 300 blocks of S. Wille Street. South Wille is already a 2 hour parking zone due to train proximity and has Sunday restrictions on the West side, but this will not prevent our street from being overcrowded with development visitors. We ask to brainstorm what can be done to prevent this. Can it be permit parking only on this street? I'd like to discuss other ideas because signs alone will not deter this problem from occurring._ 2. Inadequate Self Contained Parkin a. From the traffic study we can clearly see that there is a large deficit of parking at the proposed site by nearly 50 spaces. The size of the development and the parking offered on site do not meet village code. There is not enough parking on site to cover the number of cars that will come with the project. hope that this fact alone is enough for a second look to revise project scope. And, this does not take into account if a couple are living in a 1 bedroom apartment and they both have cars, which is probably quite common. From the study: i. Parking Supply of 81 parking spaces Parking Requirements of Proposed Development per Village Code • One -bedroom units (32 units) o 32 parking spaces (ratio of one parking space per dwelling unit) • Two-bedroom units (48 units) o 72 parking spaces (ratio of 1.5 parking space per dwelling unit) • Retail (10,234 square feet) o 26 parking spaces (ratio of four parking space per 1,000 square feet of floor area in excess of 2,500 square feet of floor area, excluding approximately 20 percent of retail/restaurant floor area since storage, restrooms, mechanical rooms, and corridors devoted to these areas can be deducted from floor area calculation) Based on the above and the requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, this translates into 130 parking spaces, which results in a deficit of 49 parking spaces. b. I ask that the scope of the project is reduced so that all parking for the building can be housed on site. It says the current scope of the project needs 130 spaces to adequately service the space and there are only 81 on-site spots available. By reducing the scope of the project so that 81 spots is sufficient it will alleviate several concerns listed above with overcrowding and traffic. If 26 spots are needed for retail, would ask that the proposed residential section be reduced so that the number of units corresponds to the remaining 55 spots. There are several ways to figure this math to make it work within the land you have available. For example, you could look at 55 one bedroom units or 20 two bedroom units and 25 1 bedroom units to make the development fit with the 55 available residential spots. I ask that you reconfigure the design so that 55 parking spaces is enough for the number of 1 and 2 bedroom units on site. Thank you for listening to my concerns and I look forward to a productive meeting later this week. Thank you, Johanna Huberty 187 Shallcross, Jason From: Tom Nelson <tomn@bytemeusa.com> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2021 9:58 PM To: Juracek, Arlene; Hoefert, Paul; Grossi, William; Hatzis, Eleni; Zadel, Michael; Rogers, Richard; Saccotelli, Colleen Cc: Shallcross, Jason; Cassady, Michael; Cooney, Bill; 'Roberta Hamann' Subject: Prospect Place Redevelopment Dear Mayor Juracek, Village Trustees & Planning and Zoning Board Members, As a long time business owner and longer time resident of this fine village we feel we need to share our thoughts on the Prospect Place redevelopment project. We have reviewed the plans and then the revised plans recently posted on your website and believe it should be approved without any more changes. We appreciate your time commitment as a TRUSTEE/MAYOR/P&ZboardMember and realize you have a tough job. We have seen the other buildings you have approved in the recent past and feel another beautiful building in the downtown area would serve us well. We all want the downtown to be a happening vibrant place but without the density we won't be able to keep businesses in the downtown. The 10 S Main St building we have watched from our kitchen and dining room windows as it is just across the street from us. Please don't let a few people derail the progress we have in our great downtown. Respectfully, Roberta Hamann and Tom Nelson 101 N Main St. Byte Me! Web Hosting and Design Im b...em....0....................................... .............................................................................................................................. c m N Terms of Service� Acceptable Usage Policy I Privac......................... .........y Pol....................... ..... i..................................................................................................................................... .................... Icy 188 Shallcross, Jason From: Anne Rademacher <rademacher.anne@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 3:10 PM To: Shallcross, Jason; Cooney, Bill Subject: Prospect Place Hello Jason and Bill, I was happy to be a part of last week's board meeting and learn more about the proposal for Prospect Place. As a neighbor to Prospect Place (I live at 309 S. Wille St) it is exciting to know that a new development will hopefully enhance the area. As much as I look forward to a new development replacing the current run down building, I am passionate about the new development being the best that it possibly can. Especially given the high visibility and since it will help shape the style of our lovely downtown Mount Prospect. Below are some considerations and questions that come to mind. 1. What is the probability of reducing the number of stories from 5 stories to 3 or 4? Note: Given the size of the property, as well as its proximity to residential homes, a slightly smaller more quaint building would not only solve for traffic concerns but also be more aesthetically pleasing. 2. Since this building will be on a highly visible corner, will the architect consider enhancing the corner of the building at Prospect and Main? The corner of Prospect and Main will be the focal point of the building and an excellent opportunity to add to Downtown Mount Prospect's architecture. Note: The current proposal resembles the new development at Central and Main, as well as Maple Street Lofts. We want train passengers as well as our own residents to admire our varied and unique styles of buildings. As a resident on Wille Street, I would love to see the size of the building scaled down to not over crowd our charming street and neighborhood. Although even more importantly, as a resident of Mount Prospect I would be most pleased to see a building go up that a) enhances the downtown landscape and works with the residential neighborhood that it backs up to b) Is architecturally interesting with less straight lines that resembles a square box. Thank you for all of your hard work towards making Mount Prospect as great as it is. Anne Zegers 189 Shallcross, Jason From: al stonitsch <astone770328@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 6:37 PM To: Shallcross, Jason Cc: Keli Stonitsch; Al Stonitsch Subject: Public Comment - Support Proposed Prospect Place Development Mr. Shallcross: My wife and I are writing to express our support for the proposed redevelopment at 1 W. Prospect Ave., which is scheduled for the Planning Zoning Commission review this Thursday. The Village has been doing an outstanding job with its focus on encouraging reinvestment in the Central Business District. The recent examples of new developments to come on line have demonstrated an outstanding vision by the Village, and an impressive willingness to be courageous and bold in seeing its vision through to reality. This is exactly the type of progressive infill (re)development that Mt. Prospect needs to enhance the vibrancy and long-term success of our downtown. Sincerely, Al and Keli Stonitsch 313 N. Russel St. Mt. Prospect 190 January 12, 2021 Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners, My name is Michelle Roush, and my husband and I have been residents of Mount Prospect since 2017. When we were choosing the community in which we would live and someday raise a family, what attracted us to Mount Prospect was the friendliness of its people, the sense of neighborhood and access to its unique and attractive downtown area. As an individual with a background in urban planning, I have a deep appreciation for the significant impact decisions by the Village and its Boards make on the current and future function and appearance of our community — decisions that affect generations of residents to come. As homeowners and residents of Mount Prospect, we have a vested interest in the development of our community and the impact developments such as the proposed Prospect Place can have on the long-term success of our downtown area. Our goals are aligned in ensuring our Mount Prospect downtown is unique, attractive and thriving for generations to come. It is part of my profession to be aware of development decisions that are made in various communities and the impacts developments have on those communities. In review of the proposed plan for Prospect Place, I have identified a number of concerns to bring to your attention and consideration. These concerns are organized into the following areas: the sight plan, architecture, landscaping and lighting. It is my sincerest hope that you take these concerns into consideration and prior to granting approval of a Village Board recommendation, that you require the Developer to alter their plans - to address these issues - before re -appearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. A development of this scale is likely to not be redeveloped for several decades — this is why it is so important that this be a project our Village can view with pride decades from now. Site Plan/PUD Concerns • Has a fiscal study been completed on the project to understand the impacts, both positive and negative, to the Village? • There appears to be a lack of parking for this project when considering the retail and residential components. Is there planned to be dedicated retail vs. resident parking? Are employees also anticipated to park onsite during their shifts? These concerns are not addressed in this plan. • The development currently includes less than one parking space per residential unit. This is very low when looking at the approved ratio of spaces per unit provided in other transit -oriented developments in neighboring communities. Will certain units not have parking included in their lease? Has a traffic study been completed that would show that a good portion of residents would utilize public transit to commute to and from work and not need a car? Insufficient residential parking may create overflow that would affect surrounding areas. • There are inconsistencies of the plan on the most southeasterly parking space. In some plans it is shown to have a straight front curb and on another plan shows an angled front. Which is correct? If the angled front is correct, this space should be designated for a compact car only. • It appears that the pickup lane on the rear of the building would not also allow two-way traffic per the auto -turn diagrams included. If this is the case, then it could be expected to create 1 191 traffic conflicts. Additional width should be provided to allow the pickup lane to not obstruct traffic. The pickup lane should be striped and signed so that cars do not park there long-term — this is not included in the current plan. There are more creative ways to introduce outdoor dining at both corners of the building that would provide some protection to diners - especially on the eastern side, adjacent to the Evergreen/Prospect/Main Street intersection. The Developer could consider solutions such as a seat wall, in ground landscape planter, etc. that could include bollards for vehicular protection. Architecture • The staff report noted this building is to share the same character with the building approved for the corner of Central and Main. While the staff report noted this is a successful development, we do not share that same sentiment. The proposed building has a very flat appearance and could be greatly improved with the addition of architectural interest to the building. We acknowledge that the "loft" style appearance of the building is currently very trendy thus many developments feature that style. The full masonry exterior is appreciated but could be improved with additional architectural elements. I have included a photograph below of a building in Milwaukee's Third Ward, featuring a similar number of stories as the proposed Prospect Place building. This building includes brick detailing, arched elements at the corner and end of the building, differing window sizes, push and pull of the fagade, slight step -back of the top floor, and a roof element which would help conceal the proposed stairwells to the proposed amenity space. While I am not suggesting that this building serve as the definitive model for Prospect Place, I include it as an example of elements which would help improve the proposed architecture of the Prospect Place development. • The corner of the building at Prospect/Evergreen/Main should feature additional architectural interest to help anchor the building at that corner. • The proposed base is very small and could be increased in height to help ground the building. • What is the color of the windows? Will they be clear like shown on the renderings? Will any spandrel glass be utilized? This should be more clearly defined in the proposal. 2 192 • It is unclear in the proposed plan, whether fencing would be placed around the amenity space or whether residents would be able to go to the far edge of the building. If fencing is proposed, it should be clearer whether it will be visible from grade. • Mechanical units are not included in the current plan. Will the building have roof top units (RTUs)? Will they be visible from grade? If RTUs may be visible from grade, the Developer should include screening around these units. • Will each unit have in unit washers and dryers? Will the vents be out to the nearest exterior wall or through the roof? If through the nearest exterior wall they should be shown so that an accurate elevation can be reviewed. Due to the number of units in this building, the elevation would appear significantly different if littered with punchouts for dryer vents. • Downspouts should be shown on the elevations, if not done internally. It is not clear on these plans how this will be addressed. • The sign band appears very small and may not allow future tenants to have more creative signage designs than simply a single line of text. Logos may be hard to fit in these areas without overlapping windows or other architectural elements of the building, unless the signage band is increased in height. Landscaping • The proposed landscape plan does not include much variety and should be expanded so that a large portion of plantings are not simultaneously lost should any disease affect a specific variety that is proposed. • There are no evergreen plantings. Evergreens should be added to add winter interest. • Additional plantings along the rear of the building would be beneficial in adding a more pedestrian scale to the building. • Room should be made along West Prospect Avenue to add landscape planters rather than just planter boxes. There are many columnar varieties of plantings which would help to add a pedestrian scale to the building since there is no landscape break from the adjacent parallel parking. • If only planter boxes can be accommodated along West Prospect, then at least a seasonal display of landscape materials would be more interesting. It is not currently clear how the perennial plantings are proposed to be planted — whether each box would feature a mixture of plantings or whether each box would feature one type of perennial. • Is the building planned to be pet friendly? If so, there should be designated pet relief areas. It appears that all of the landscaped areas adjacent to the rear of the building are planned to have ground cover. If this building is to be pet friendly, it would make more sense to have turf in some of these areas. • A ground cover variety is not listed on the plan, and it should be specified. Lighting • No light fixtures are shown around the outdoor dining areas per the photometric plan. Light fixtures should be added to these areas for success of potential future restaurants and safety of patrons. • Footcandle readings from fixtures on the building on West Prospect are not adequately included in this plan. The readings along West Prospect Avenue appear to correspond to the Village 3 193 owned pole mounted fixtures, rather than the accent lights noted on the plan. Overall, it is not clear. These details should be clarified on the proposed plans. Thank you for your time and consideration in addressing these concerns. It is our hope that the redevelopment of this property can be something our entire community can be proud of. M= . .... . .... ... .............. . ... jjjjdi��p"' HIP 11100 Ill hump n un IVN�m Pi jjj� 11"oO." 1"00 011 11,011010 000 'd Michelle Roush Erich Roush El 194 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -24-20 Hearing Date: January 28, 2021 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1-27 W Prospect Avenue, 150 S Main Street PETITIONER: Prospect Place Development Partners, LLC PUBLICATION DATE: December 30, 2020 REQUEST: Conditional use for a final PUD MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Donnelly William Beattie Walter Szymczak Agostino Filippone Lisa Griffin Norbert Mizwicki Thomas Fitzgerald MEMBERS ABSENT: Sharon Otteman STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Jason Shallcross, AICP, Senior Planner Bill Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Tom Lowe Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Commissioner Filippone made a motion seconded by Commissioner Mizwicki to approve the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on January 14, 2020. The minutes were approved 7-0. Chairman Donnelly introduced case, PZ - 24 -20: A conditional use for a final PUD at 1-27 W Prospect Avenue, 150 S Main Street. This case is Village Board final. Mr. Shallcross stated that since this is a continuation of the PZ -24-20 case at the January 14th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, staff will not be making a presentation. Chairman Donnelly introduced the Petitioner, Prospect Place Development Partners, LLC, and stated they are still sworn in from the last meeting. Mr. Lowe stated several changes they have made since the January 14th meeting. Mr. Lowe stated he is fully confident in the project, and it would be a great add to the downtown. He further stated the following changes; 94 onsite parking stalls are now proposed instead of 81, 100 parking stalls are required per code instead of 104 due to reorganizing the floor plan to account for more 1 bedroom units, and 6 leased stalls on the Village owned Wille Street parking lot instead of 23 leased stalls. Mr. Lowe then stated parallel parking is now increased along Prospect Avenue, and first floor retail is still Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 28, 2021 1 PZ -24-20 195 proposed, at just over 10,000 square feet. His presentation continued, showing the underground parking garage floor plan, where the Petitioner was able to add additional underground stalls. Mr. Splitt explained the massing and architecture of the building, noting exposed steel and face brick which blend well together. Mr. Lowe compared his building to similar, previously approved developments in the downtown, including Maple Street Lofts, 10 N. Main, and 20 West. Mr. Lowe also stated his proposal is aligned with applicable Mount Prospect long range plans. The Petitioners provided a motion rendering of the building, describing additional architecture and outdoor spaces intended to be engaging, including the first floor retail and rooftop amenity deck. Chairman Donnelly stated letters and comments received are split 50/50 for and against the project. He asked about the parking requirement. Mr. Shallcross stated the parking requirement for the residential component is 100 parking stalls. He stated the Petitioner is now proposing more onsite parking stalls. Mr. Shallcross further stated that the commercial parking requirement is 31 parking stalls. 37 parking stalls are located on Prospect Ave. and the Wille Street parking lot (among other stalls for commuter parking) to satisfy the commercial parking requirement. Mr. Shallcross stated several questions have been asked in the chat box. Commissioner Filippone asked about the redevelopment agreement in terms of what is discussed at this meeting and what is discussed at the Village Board level. Mr. Shallcross stated the RDA would be discussed at the Village Board level. Commissioner Griffin asked about retail and guest parking. Mr. Shallcross stated there are no onsite retail or guest parking. Mr. Shallcross further stated the Wille Street parking lot also features 50 stalls for retail parking and other parking overflow. Mr. Shallcross began reading the public comment and questions in the chat box. Mr. Shallcross stated Johanna Huberty had a question related to street widths and accommodating PACE bus routes and retail parking. Chairman Donnelly and Mr. Shallcross stated the Village Board would address this question. Mr. Shallcross stated Ms. Huberty asked about onsite retail parking. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 28, 2021 PZ -24-20 196 Mr. Shallcross stated all parking onsite is for the apartment units. Commissioner Beattie asked how parking stalls for the apartment units would be assigned. Mr. Lowe stated it would be a case-by-case basis, and each unit is guaranteed at least one stall. Mr. Shallcross stated Michelle Rousch asked if the applicant would consider additional architectural detailing. Mr. Splitt stated the team feels the existing proposal is sufficient. Mr. Shallcross stated Ms. Rousch asked about additional landscaping and alternative landscaping. Mr. Shallcross stated that one of the conditions on the staff report is the project must meet Village Code in terms of landscaping. He stated site plantings must be 50% deciduous and 50% evergreen per Code. Dead plantings will be replaced before a certificate of occupancy is issued. Mr. Shallcross stated Ms. Rousch asked if the project would turn into condos in the future. Mr. Shallcross stated the request would go before the Planning & Zoning Commission. Hearing no further comments Chairman Donnelly closed the hearing and asked for a motion. Commissioner Filippone made a motion seconded by Commissioner Fitzgerald to approve: 1. A Conditional Use for a final planned unit development (PUD) consisting of a five -story, eighty (80) unit apartment building with ten thousand two hundred thirty-four (10,234) square feet of commercial space and fifty-nine (59) garage parking spaces and twenty-two (22) at grade parking spaces, subject to the following conditions listed in the staff report. Discussion of the Petitioners included Commissioner Filippone indicating he was impressed with the revisions the Petitioners brought to the meeting based on feedback from the January 14th meeting. Mr. Shallcross indicated an attendee had her hand raised. Anne Zeggers asked about the architectural improvement of the building at Prospect Avenue and Main Street. Mr. Splitt stated the windows are recessed, brick is protruding with shadow lines, and the group increased the window sill sizes. He stated the brick tone was changed, and the interior of the building has been upgraded. Ms. Zeggers asked about decreasing the building by 1 story. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 28, 2021 PZ -24-20 197 Mr. Lowe stated from a financial perspective, lowering the building height by a story would not be feasible. Ms. Zeggers asked about hours on the rooftop amenity deck. Mr. Lowe stated that has not been determined yet. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Fitzgerald, Mizwicki, Filippone, Szymczak, Griffin, Donnelly NAYS: Beattie The recommendation was approved by a vote of 6-1. Hearing no further cases, Commissioner Mizwicki made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie and the meeting was adjourned at 8:05 PM. Connor Harmon Development Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 28, 2021 PZ -24-20 198 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -24-20 Hearing Date: January 14, 2021 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1-27 W Prospect Avenue, 150 S Main Street PETITIONER: Prospect Place Development Partners, LLC PUBLICATION DATE: December 30, 2020 REQUEST: Conditional use for a final PUD MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Donnelly William Beattie Walter Szymczak Agostino Filippone Lisa Griffin MEMBERS ABSENT: Norbert Mizwicki Sharon Otteman Thomas Fitzgerald STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Connor Harmon, Development Planner Jason Shallcross, Senior Planner Bill Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Tom Lowe 1 Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:02 pm. Commissioner Filippone made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on December 10, 2020. The minutes were approved 5-0. Chairman Donnelly introduced case, PZ -24-20: A conditional use for a final PUD at 1-27 W Prospect Avenue, 150 S Main Street. This case is Village Board final. Mr. Shallcross explained that the Petitioner is proposing a redevelopment of the Subject Property that would consist of a five -story mixed-use building with 80 dwelling units, approximately 10,000 square feet of retail space, and 81 on-site parking stalls. Mr. Shallcross explained that the Petitioner is seeking a parking agreement with the Village to secure the use of 23 additional parking in the adjacent Wille Street parking lot. Mr. Shallcross provided additional details on the elevations, parking, traffic, and school impacts of the project. Mr. Shallcross detailed the long-range planning precedent by the Village which calls for development similar to that proposed by the zoning case and stated that staff recommends approval of the conditional use request. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 14, 2021 PZ -24-20 199 Commissioner Griffin asked when the traffic study was performed. Mr. Shallcross stated it was completed for this project. Commissioner Beattie discussed the proposed parking agreement and on-site parking and asked if it was possible for the project to be reduced in size. Commissioner Griffin asked if the school districts have weighed in on the project. Mr. Shallcross stated that no feedback was received from the schools. Mr. Cooney explained the potential school impact, children generated from adjacent projects, and TIF compensation regulations for school districts. The Commissioners discussed school compensation regulations. Commissioner Filippone asked for information on planned traffic improvements in the area related to the traffic study. Mr. Cooney stated that the traffic study evaluated the generation based on existing conditions and mentioned future improvements as providing relief to current traffic issues. Commissioner Filippone asked about relocating the current tenants. Mr. Cooney stated that the petitioner and Village staff have met with each of the tenants to determine their long term space needs. He stated that all of the tenants have a lease provision that requires only a 4 - month notice to vacate if the property is redeveloped. Commissioner Filippone asked about the zoning district and bulk regulations in place. Mr. Cooney stated that the property is zoned B-5 and what the zoning district allows to be constructed by right. Commissioner Donnelly swore in: Tom Lowe of 120 S. Elm Street, Mount Prospect, IL Jonathan Splitt of 4001 N Ravenswood, Chicago, IL Dane Bucholtz of 4001 N Ravenswood, Chicago, IL Michael Werthmann of 9575 W Higgins Road, Rosemont, IL Mr. Lowe, Splitt, and Bucholtz gave an overview of the project and area development experience. Commissioner Griffin asked when the traffic counts were conducted. Mr. Werthmann explained that the counts were combined from 2018 and present due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Commissioner Beattie asked if new area developments were considered in the study. Mr. Werthmann stated that the projected traffic from area developments were included in the study to Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 14, 2021 PZ -24-20 200 account for ambient growth in the area. Chairman Donnelly asked how much more traffic will be generated at peak times by the project. Mr. Werthmann explained the results of the study and stated that the area roadways will not decrease existing service levels. Commissioner Filippone asked for additional information on how traffic flows are assigned to local streets. Mr. Werthmann explained that the net gain in traffic is not significantly more than existing when considering the site's reduction of 9,000 square feet of commercial space. Commissioner Filippone asked if the 10-25% reductions in trips were generated from Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). Mr. Werthmann stated that the 10% came from Census data, and the 25% came from the original 10%, the development being mixed use, and because the site is located in a downtown suburban area. Mr. Werthmann further stated the numbers came from past calculations and best practices within trips generated. Mr. Splitt stated a general percentage for reduction of trips is 50%. He also stated that in many past projects, some parking stalls within the projects have gone unused or unleased, meaning residents take advantage of the TOD aspect of the project. Chairman Donnelly and Commissioner Beattie had dialogue on how residents would commute around town and the area. Commissioner Beattie reemphasized his concern with traffic and parking. Mr. Lowe stated that a grocery store, Caputo's, is currently being built out at Maple Street Lofts, and that residents of this development would walk to and use that grocery store frequently. Mr. Werthmann stated that overall the study would not change if the reductions in trips were changed from the general 10-25%. Commissioner Filippone asked how the size of the underground parking was determined. Mr. Lowe stated it was configured based on stormwater management requirements. He stated a total of 59 underground stalls would be provided. Mr. Splitt stated this design is the most efficient design with underground parking. Commissioner Beattie asked when occupancy may be granted at 10 N. Main. Mr. Lowe stated he is optimistic about 10 N. Main leasing and sees positivity around the downtown rental market. Commissioner Beattie asked If there was dialogue about constructing a commercial development instead of mixed use. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 14, 2021 PZ -24-20 201 Mr. Lowe stated staff asked to evaluate the renovation of the existing building. He stated this was not an option due to the cost. He further stated retail was looked at, but due to COVID 19, and conditions pre- COVID, this was not the ideal choice on the site. He then stated a mixed use development was preferred, and that the residential leasing will offset the commercial leasing should commercial start vacant or partially leased. Commissioner Griffin asked if there is any plan to scale back the plan for less units. Mr. Lowe stated there has been no discussion to scale back, and that he and his team are fully confident in the plan. Commissioner Filippone asked about the construction schedule, specifically how construction would be phased with regard to traffic. Mr. Splitt stated both lanes of Prospect should remain open. Mr. Shallcross began reading through what residents wrote on the virtual portal. Mr. Shallcross stated Johanna Huberty asked if the Petitioner looked at any other parking areas in the area for additional parking. Chairman Donnelly stated the Petitioner previously answered the question. Mr. Shallcross stated that Ms. Huberty asked further about potential parking issues and if there has been a traffic study done independently by the Village. Mr. Shallcross stated traffic studies are conducted within the peak travel hour of the day, meaning new trips generated are added to the peak time. The Village did not hire an independent consultant for another traffic study. Mr. Shallcross stated that Allison Bull asked if the Petitioner could further explain the traffic impact along Wille Street. Chairman Donnelly stated there are no commuters parking cars within this development. Mr. Werthmann stated traffic is disturbed at different times, and projections indicate a handful of added trips during the morning and afternoon, and that residential roads can more than accommodate the added trips. Mr. Shallcross stated that Elaine Carlstrom asked where guest parking will be located. Chairman Donnelly and Mr. Shallcross stated guests can park on site and the Wille Street parking lot. Mr. Shallcross stated that Allison Bull stated she still had concerns on added traffic. Mr. Shallcross stated that Johanna Huberty stated the existing commercial space is partially empty so the traffic study numbers aren't fully accurate. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 14, 2021 PZ -24-20 202 Chairman Donnelly stated there will be traffic in the future whether this development is built or not. Mr. Shallcross stated that Justin Toews asked about stormwater drainage around the site. Mr. Shallcross stated the Village and MWRD have regulations in place, and the Petitioner plans on addressing all of those regulations. Mr. Shallcross stated that several residents asked if they could speak. Ms. Chung, 219 S. Wille Street, began speaking, and was appreciative that the site is looking to be renovated and redeveloped, however she had concerns about traffic and parking on site. She suggested traffic mitigation techniques. Chairman Donnelly stated without the Wille parking lot stalls, the project is not possible. He further stated there would be less commuter drivers down residential streets. He then stated the 5 story profile is needed to make the project viable. Finally, he stated speed humps impact emergency services and would not be feasible. Ms. Huberty, 217 S. Wille Street, stated that she has concerns on traffic within the immediate area, and recommends an independent traffic study be done. She further asked how many commuters would use the Wille Street parking lot pre COVI D-19. Mr. Cooney stated half the spaces in that lot are for commuters. He stated overall the lot is being readjusted. Ms. Huberty further stated she has concerns on parking on Evergreen with respect to the PACE bus. Ms. Huberty also stated her request for a smaller scale development on the site. Michelle Roush, 309 N. Will Street, stated concerns on parking and specifically, visitor parking. She stated outdoor dining could be expanded at the corners of the building. She further stated the architecture could be improved, and that lighting could be improved for a better aesthetic look. Mr. Lowe stated he would like to request to continue the case to the next applicable meeting, on January 28th_ Hearing no further comments Chairman Donnelly asked for a motion to continue. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Griffin to continue the case: 1. A Conditional Use for a final planned unit development (PUD) consisting of a five -story, eighty (80) unit apartment building with ten thousand two hundred thirty-four (10,234) square feet of commercial space and fifty-nine (59) garage parking spaces and twenty-two (22) at grade parking spaces, subject to the following conditions listed in the staff report. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Beattie, Filippone, Szymczak, Griffin, Donnelly NAYS: None A vote of 5-0 was taken to continue the case to the January 28th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 14, 2021 PZ -24-20 203 Hearing no further cases, Commissioner Filippone made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie and the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 PM. Jason C. Shallcross, AICP Senior Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting —January 14, 2021 PZ -24-20 204