HomeMy WebLinkAbout1750_001MINUTh-:.----'OF THE REGULAR MEETING OE,.--,,-lE
MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FEBRUARY 19, 1985
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Krause called the meeting to order at 8.-00 P.M.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Gerald Farley.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll calli
Mayor Carolyn Krause
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Gerald Farley
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Norma Murauskis
Trustee George Van Geem
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to
approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor
and Board of Trustees held February 5, 1985.
Upon roll call,-, Ages: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
APROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
approve the following list of bills:
General Fund $ 367,152
Revenue Sharing Fund 13,417
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 24,569
Community Development Block Grant Fund 6,764
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 30,041
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 77,914
Parking System Revenue Fund 2,528
Risk Management Fund 37,207
Capital Improvement,, Repl. or Repair Fund 9,650
Communiciations Equipment 1984 5,409
Upon roll call:, Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays.- None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved t
accept the financial report dated January 31, 1985,
subj ect to audit. i
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays: None
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None.
MAYOR'S REPORT
A request was presented from the new owners of Monterey
Whaling Village, Kensington & Rand Roads, to assume the
existing Class "S" liquor license. 1t,is proposed that
the restaurant will be remodeled and the new name will
be Chessie's Restaurant.
The Village Board 'acknowledged the request and wished the
new owners much luck in their venture in mount Prospect.
0
Mmffi�
CLASS "S"
LIQUOR LICENS
MONTEREY
WHALING VILLA
CHESSIE'S
APPOIN'T'MENT. Mayor Krause presented the name of Judson Strickland,
JUDSON 906 Whitegate, to be considered for appointment to
STRICK�AND: the Cable Commission, replacing Mary Wafer who has
resigned.
CABLE COMMISSION
February 19, 1985 Page 2
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Mayor and
appoint Mr. Strickland to the Cable T.V. Commission.
Upon roll call: Ayes; Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays : None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
Z" BA 48-V-84, St. Paul Federal Bank, M.P. Plaza
ZBA 48-V--85
An Ordinance was presented for lst readi.n.g that would
ST . PAUL
grant a variation for this property .and permit an
FEDERAL BANK
addition to an existing non --conforming sign.
Mr. John Mays, attorney for St. Paul Federal Bank,
requested the Village. Board to waive the 2nd reading
of this Ordinance.
At the request of the petitioner, Trustee Floros,
seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to waive the rule`
requiring two readings of an Ordinance in order to
take action on the subject Ordinance.
upon roll call-. Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
.Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO.3496
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 3496
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR CERTAIN
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 940 EAST RAND ROAD
IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem.
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SAID OF VZJIAGE
An Ordinance was presented for lst reading that would
OVZM PROPERTY
authorize the sale of real property owned by the
Village of Mount Prospect, namely 208 W. Hiawatha Trail.
208 VL Hiawatha
This Ordinance will be presented March 5th for 2nd
reading.
AMEND CH. 18
,An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would amend the Traffic Cade. (Chapter 18 ) to authorize
a STOP sign at Sha Bonee Trail on Can Dota.
Trustee Farley, seconded. by Trustee Murauskis, moved
to waive: the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance
in order to take action on the proposed amendment.
Upon roll call: Ages` Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nags: bone
Motion carried.
ORD.NO.3497
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved
February 19, 1985 Page 2
ti
for passage of Ordinance No. 3497
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE)
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis , Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 56-V-84, 1825 Magnolia Lane
This request deals with a variation of 4" from the side
yard requirement and a variation to allow a floor area
ratio of 0.32 instead of the permitted 0.30. The
petitioner stated it is his desire to build an addition
to this existing single family home, however, due to the
design and proposed chimney for the fireplace, he is
requesting these variations. The Zoning Board of Appeals
voted 6-0 in favor of this request.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to concur
with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and
grant the requests in ZBA 56-V-84.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for lst reading on March 5th.
ZBA 1 -SU -851 1405 S. Hickory
It was noted that this case was continued at the Zoning
Board of Appeals in order for the petitioner to be present
at the hearing.
ZBA 2 -SU -85, 824 East Rand Road
This case deals with a request for a variation to permit
two free-standing signs at this location. The subject
property is a Planned Unit Development which plan
authorizes a cinema. The petitioner would like . to convert
the cinema, which has been vacant for approximately 2 years,
to a banquet hall. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted
6-0 to grant the request.
It was noted that although the various uses in this Planned
Unit Development are owned by individual owners, the parking
lot is a common use to all uses. The petitioner and Loras,
owners of the buildings to the east of the proposed
4anquet hall - have agreed to improve the parking lot,
basically resurfacing, re -alignment of parking spaces and
entrance drive, and landscaping, however, the property owner
to the west, Thunderbird Bowling Lanes, has not expressed
an interest in participating with this improvement. Since
the parking lot is used by the entire complex., it is the
feeling of the Village Board and staff that the entire
parking lot should be improved.
Before the Village Board takes action on this request, the
petitioner was requested to meet with staff and the other
property owners involved with this PUD to consider the
improvement of the entire parking lot,
This case will be considered at the March 5th meeting o
the Village Board. I
ZBA 56-V-85
I
ZBA 2 -SU -8
824 E.Rand R
Page 3 February 19, 1.985
ZBA 3-Af 4 -SU, ZBA 3 -Ar 4 -SUI 5-V-85, Northeast corner Golf Road
5-V-85 and William Street
Kinder Care At the request of the petitioner, this case has been
continued to the Village Board meeting on
March 19th.
ZBA 6 -Z.7 -V-85 ZBA 6-Z-85 and 7-V-85, 620 East Northwest Highway
620 E. North- This deals with a request for a change in zoning
West Hwy. from B-3 to B-4 and a variation to permit a rear yard
encroachment.
The petitioner stated that it was their desire to
convert the existing building, a full service gas
station abandoned approximately 7 years ago,, to an
automobile service operation specializing in Fiats.
The manufacturer of the Flat automobile no longer
provides the specialized service needed for these
vehicles and the petitioner notedthere are several
thousand within the northwest suburbs. Due to the
nature of the proposal B74zoning is necessary.
Also requested is a variation to permit an existing
recorded easement in the rear yard to remain. The
easement was granted some years ago to the business
to the east of the subject property for the purpose
of allowing that business access to their loading
area.
The petitioner stated that the neighbors were contacted
and none objected to the proposal. The Zoning Board of
Appeals voted 6-0 in favor of the B-4 zoning and the
variation to permit an encroachment into the rear yard.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the requested B-4 zoning and to
grant the requested variation.
Upon roll call: Ayes,: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis . Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance re -zoning the property and an Ordinance
granting a variation for the subject property will be
presented on March 5th for 1st readings.
ZBA 8-V-85 ZBA 8-V-85, Opus Corporation
Opus Corp. This request is for a variation to permit an office
building 55 feet in height rather than the permitted
30 foot high structure. The Zoning Board of Appeals
voted 2 in favor and 4 against the variation, which
vote denied the request.
Mr. Neil Rauenhorst, Assistant Director of Real Estate,
represented Opus Corporation. It was stated that 6 years
ago when the development was granted the zoning and
variations necessary it was not proposed that they would
exceed the height restriction of 30 feet, however, studies
now indicate that the market is such that a 4 story
building would be very marketable. Mr. Rauenhorst also
stated that the proposed building would be located at
the entrance to Kensington Center for Business off
Wolf Roadf approximately 11000 feet from the closest
single family residence.
It was noted that staff had expressed concern about the
internal utilities being able to handle the increased
usage, however the petitioner stated that all modification
would be made to accommodate additional volume.
February 19, 1985 Page.4
Mr. Frank Lombardo, 707 Wilshire, Mr. Richard Hendricks,
1537 E. Emmerson Lane and one other resident of the area
spoke in opposition to the proposal. It was stated that
a building 55 feet in height would effect their property.
It was the opinion of the Village Board that this type
of building, placed at the proposed location, would not
be a detriment to the single family homes in the area ani
that Opus would co-operate r landscaping to
screen as much as possible.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
grant the request for a height variation of 55 feet being
the subject of ZBA 8-V-85.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem.
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented March 5th for lst reading.
Mayor Krause declared a recess at 10:40 P.M. RECESS
The meeting was reconvened at 10:48 P.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Krause, Trustees Arthur,
Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem.
Absent: Trustee Wattenberg
The Community Development Block Grant Audit was presented, CDBG AUDIT
and the Village Board acknowledged receipt of same.
A proposal was presented to authorize Karrison & Byrne,
Certified Public Accountants, to proceed with the annual
audit of the Village funds. It was noted that Karrison
& Byrne had submitted a proposal based on conducting the
audit for 3 years, this 1984-85 audit would be the 2nd
'year. The proposal was submitted at a cost of $15rOOO
for each of the three years.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Murauskisf moved to
accept the proposal from Karrison & Byrne to conduct the
1984-85 Village audit at a cost not to exceed $15,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Nays: None
Motion carried.
I all 101.0 a 0
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Terrance L. Burghard, Village Manager, presented the bids BIDS:
submitted for 14 --replacement squads in the Police Department. POLICE
A complete tabulation of the bid results is attached to SQUADS
these minutes.
Based on the various bidders meeting the specifications
it was the recommendation of the administration that the
bid submitted by Jennings Chevrolet at a unit cost of
$11,972, totalling $167,608, be accepted for the pruchase
of 14 vehicles.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved t#
Page 5 February 19, 1985
'th the recommedation of the administration and
concur wl
accept the bid submitted by Jennings Chevrolet at a
cost not to exceed $16716 08.
Upon roll call.- Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays: None
BID WAIVER: 5
A request was presented to waive the bidding procedure
DEFIBRILLATOR in order to purchase specialized equipment for the
Fire Department. The proposal is for one Lifepak
Defibrillator and •
monitor and accessory bag for a
total cost of $6,445. This specialized equipment
PHYSIO CONTROL needs1to be compatable.with the local hospitals and
other units in use. The purchase would be made from
Physio Control, who is the only local source for this
type of equipment.
Trustee Van Gemm, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved
to waive the bidding procedure and authorize the
&urchase of the Lifepak Defibrillator, monitor and
accessory bag from Physio Control at a cost not to
exceed
Upon roll call: Ayes.- Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays: None
WATER.- Motion carried.
DES PLAINES/ Mt. Burghard presented a Resolution that would
MOUNT PROSPECT authorize a I h3oint venture between the Village and the
INTERCONNECTIONCity of Des�V31aines- With the anticipation of acquiring
Lake Michigan water later this year, it is the opinion
of the Engineer that an 'interconnection for emergency
water supply would be adviseable. It is proposed that
such an interconnection be made at Stevenson and Central
Road, between Des Plaines and the Village. The City of
Des Plaines has agreed to this interconnection with the
cost to be shared, 30% to be paid by Des Plaines and
70% to be paid by Mount Prospect.
RES. NO -7-85 Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of Resolution No. T85
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE
CITY OF DES PLAINES FOR EMERGENCY WATER INTER-
CONNECTION
Upon roll call- Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FOREST RIVER The Village Manager gave a brief update on the status
FIRE PROTECT. of the agreement between the Village and Forest River
DISTRICT Fire Protection District. He stated that the District
had not provided the documentation as required by the
Agreement to establish the amount of funds collected,
expended with the remaining funds to be forwarded to
the Village for services rendered by our Fire Department.
Since the last meeting of the Village Board, there has
been received documentation indicating the District is
maintaining a reserve of approximately $25,000. It is
the opinion of the administration that the District
should be forwarding all monies to the Village after
administrative costs.
Mr. Burghard stated further discussion would take place
February 19, 1985 Page 6
and a recommendation would be forth coming from the
Village Manager.
An Ordinance was presented for lst reading that would
amend Chapter 8 of the Village Code pertaining to
employee organizations.
This Ordinance will be presented March 5 for 2nd
reading.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
It was noted that further information and study was
being undertaken on the subject of Tax Increment
Financing.
Mayor Krause announced that Governor Thompson would be
at Forest View High School on February 28th to discuss
local issues.
Also announced was the fact that the Illinois Commerce
Commission would be holding a hearing on the Village's
request to move the commuter train station/platform and
to landscape the railroad right-of-way on March 5th.
ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:23 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
101
Page 7 February 19, 1985
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CAS" POSITION
FEBRUARY 28, 1985
Cash & Invest-
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest.
Balance
2/15 Through
Per Attached
Balance
2/14/85
2/28/85
List of Bills
Transfers
2/28/85
General & Special Revenue Funds:
General Fund
$ 235,587
$ 726,314
$469,553
$
$ 492,348
Revenue Sharing Fund
721,436
-
9,412
63,024
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
629,164
67,001
17,927
678t238
Community Development -Block Grant Fund
2,355
3,178
4,446
1,087
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
28,376
13,465
61,836
35,005
Enterprise Funds:
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
1,960,851
104,773
173,788
79,534
1,971,370
Parking System Revenue Fund
67,366
4,290
2,438
69,218
Internal Service Fund:
Risk Management Fund
217,430
719,196
79,808
208,818
C& qita�lProiects:
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
906,204
299,200
432
934,972
Corporate Purposes Construction Fund 1973
422,848
2,019
-
424.867
Special Service Area Construction #5
1,309,807
43,359
(799,534)
11,273-,632
Debt Service Funds:
Corporate Purposes 1973
207,000
5,896
212,896
Corporate Purposes 1974
448,611
11,942
-
460,553
Communications Equipment 1984
10,729
3,558
-
14,287
Special Service Area #1
15,974
1,541
-
17,515
Special Service Area #2
13,560
21,094
-
15,654
Special Service Area #3
186
2,462
-
2,648
Special Service Area #4
39,342
101
-
3,443
Special Service Area #5
101,555
10,325
-
111,880
Special Service Area #5 Bond Reserve
329,147
199
-
329,346
Trust & Agency Funds:
Trust Fund
275,077
11,257
125
286,209
Police Pension Fund
69966,464
97,450
18,494
7,045,420
Firemen's Pension Fund
8,6019,120
157,750
6,454
8,752,416
_S=pecial Assessments:
-S/A Funds - Prior to 1940
138*326
726
-
139,052
S/A Funds - After 1940
8,625
-
8,625
$22,972,140$1,370,096
$7899713
-0-
$23,552,523
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/85
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNT S
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
PREMIUM GASOLINE
$89146.64
'`-
REG GASOLINE
$7085*84
$159232*48ti=
JOSEPH ADUILLA
REFUND TREE DEPOSIT—KOTEL SUES*
$125.00
$125.00
HOMAS DESPARTE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$6*30
S6*30
L E CONSTRUCTION COo B-1758
REFUND OVERCHARGE OF WATER METER
$622 30
$622 30
ROGER Fa FARLEIGH
REFUND FINAL WATER RILL
$4o2O
$4.2O
ARTHUR J GALLAGHER L CO
INS* RENEWAL 85/86FY
S40t688o00
$409688oOO
MR. JOSEPH MARIN
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$31«50
*31.50
PAYROLL ACCOUNT
PAYROLL ENDING 2/28/85
$2639804.54
.-
PAYROLL ENDING 2128185
$219762.46
.
PAYROLL ENDING 2128185
$19858.82
PAYROLL ENDING 2/28/85
$1042*04
$2881467.86.,
PETTY CASH — MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TRAVEL Ei SUPPLIES
$56.00
$56.00-`,=
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
FEB* POLICE PENSION MSB.
$189493.81
ry
FEB* FIRE: PENSION DISB*
$6,454oO3
$24047.84'
MR. RUSSELL PIROVANO
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.10
S2*10
RESEARCH PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL COR
.REFUND ON CREDIT BALANCE
$28.79
$28.79
MR. ELIN SOUERSTROM
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
S6*30
$6.30
ROB-RT STARCK CO. REALTORS
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$29 40
$29.40
Tl-*�—COLLECTION, INL e
COLLECTIONS FROM LISTING 12/27/84
$371.67
$371.67
N ARR Y VAN ORDEN
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL.
$4*20
$4.20
M��..--� ARL WFSNER
REFUND FINAL WATER FILL
$44.31
54431
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
=:=_: ;=TOTAL%=•=
$370 •668* 25
GENERAL FUND
$2799464*69 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GT
$1:042*04
WATER & SEWER FUND — OEM
$22, 541 *86 PARKING SYSTEM
REVENUE FUNDI
$1.858.82
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$401638.00 POLICE PENSION
FUND
$18v493.81
FIREMFN' S PENSION FUND
S69454o03 TRUST FUND
io12500
VENDOR.
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL CONSULTANTS
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
V E G PRINTERS INE. o
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28185
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SERVICES RENDERED
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
PRINTING
$2,406*50
INVOICE AMOUNT
$2 f 295000
$44.00
$71050
T 0 T A L ti=
.A. a. .4wf, .r. # .d. ,d. e+. A...i. J. 1..4. 4. 46 .0..J'w A, J Jr J_t .0. d. b .A wir ai...,y�y .0. � 1 d. A. J. �y .+r * J. 41. * .f. .,-..4 J 4, J..! � .fir . , J4. r1. d. J..A. A# Ao {� 'A. 4. .06 �. * * Y' � %- * * J. -0-
N,
,MMMN,'YwM��ti'Mti,i" �wiwlr`f.�t�le,MMT'Y"'!t" '�w'iwM*M* �**Y`��Iiw�MMMhwMMlb,�YM�MM�1P�N 1=1%� or it e4,MYM+w.e'tw�i M'Y 14,MT �i iw � 4
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
PACE 2
TOTAL
$2.29 (5.00
$4{x.00
*71050
$2 ? 406 0 50
BERKEY CAMERA SHOP
SUPPLIES
$14088
$14088
CAPA
MEMBERSHIP
$20000
*20000
FOCAL PRESS
MANUALS
$460 85
$460 85
THE FORMS GROUP
SUPPLIES
$211.63
$211.63
I .B. M0 CORPORATION
MONTHLY PAYMENT
$75 +4
$75 44
It3M
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/3/1-3/31
$490513
$49 50
IVT CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
SUPPLIES
559000
MANUAL
$22.20
$81w20
)RTHOPAEDICS? LTD.
SERVICES RENDERED
s290*00
$290.00
Nu,.. HWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
543067
$43067
PETTY CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TRAVEL SUPPLIES
$10.00
=
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH- VILLAGE MANAGERS OFFICE TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL L SUPP#.IES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
PEDERSEN L HOUPT SERVICES RENDERED
VONeRIESFN G REDMOND SERVICES RENDERED
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
$5000
%56.12
$72.90
$10.30
$32.25
$60.60
$2.390.10
56001
*=T0TAL�4=
r
-s71.12.;:
i
�176a05:;.
$6.01
$3t476.45
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28185
VENDOR.
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$3*476 45
.4 4 .+ .4 .A. +. .i ,�{,, .!r a..0, y may, 4. + Jr � .t4 .!4 JL .0, .A. ..y .�..1 �A..M d. •s +.►..4
'i. siw is .ya ..r. '�rl' ti '"r .i..i. •ra "k i• .2.'�j, y. ti. %..r '.• Y` M M'.w 'Y t• �iw 'N �" 4a .yr 'C i}i 7`' w '� i `. •4 21.. * .+ 1 ..4.4 � i i .14 J. ...e , �..4 1 .t. J..R .4
Y M '�` i. 'I` 4• k` +'f• mil` M P '+•'at'Y+ • aw '.` .r..r a1-11r .` • .. y..ra .. y. �...` .,r �` ti. M 'it .ra
.+i J.. ► 4 J�..4 d1. .. .4 .. ..... .b
lr .. J. .t. +L .a..t.
#" '... .ti..ia 'r ti..r. is .ya .i. y..i..F. ii. .r..i. is 'r..r. !. .i..+ .ya .r..r.
F ICE DEPARTMENT
ASPEN RIBBONS INC.
SUPPLIES
$11496
$114.96
BLAI R TEMPORARIES
SERVICES RENDERED
$148a00
SERVICES RENDERED
$270.00
$418.00
COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR
1984 TAXES/ LANG LOT
$341..65
$341.65.!
KELLY SERVILES. INC*
SERVICES RENDERED
$387.45
$387.45
PETTY CASH - MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$10.91
�=
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$3* 00
$13.91-'�
MICHAEL E. PIEKLD* CPA
SERVICES RENDERED
$560*00
$560 00
POSTMASTER MT PROSPECT
POSTAGE FOR METER MACHINE
$1 * 100*00
S11100400'
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$33.42
$33.42
TONE COMMUNICATIONSf INCe
SERVICES RENDERED
$56 00
$56.00
XEROX CORP.
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$103 06
$103906
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
TOTAL=►=
$3* 128.45
GENERAL FUND
$3912845
,�y. J........A. ,p- .,%. J+r 4 ... � . .ti 1..t. 4 .+. 4, -u J' 1..*' fr J. ..4 .+1...y .A. *A..4, *.� *�y tee. aa��..... .�y, ..i. ,.A..A J. A....4 -. ,t. � A. R. 1. 1r .14 Jt J..r. -..4 .4 .% ..e •4 A. 41
M .i..�..i..r. ,..Y..i. 'i..y. 'i` Ii- M h. ,i. h * .�:.r. '11 ` ft- rya "r" qi..`.. i .y..y. '!" .y. A. 1%, l/+ ti` M 1w '4" .i. "sw M i* ht 1Y M Y h..rw .ti. '.r'�t ti. �L ,y..,,..y. 'i. i. qi..4..*. V -J V e M '.• ;r` M
� ..i. 0r ..4 r4 J P. +.. - -- a, .�..A..+..+' . w+r ...A, J.... .+:.t. �...+. 0-'1r ..e .0.
s• M r .r.. It..iw � S�: 1 .;a .r..;. Io, qa .y. i.., -e 'e. 'r. �..r.
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
IBM
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/3/1-3131
$49 50
$49.50
R.T. JENKINS
FEB*E MARCH NEWSLETTER
$1.186.75
$19186.75
LAND TITLE COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$50000
$50.00
PADDOCK PUBLICATI0NS
LEGAL PAGE AD
$42.50
$42.50
POSTMASTER 11T PROSPECT
POSTAGE FOR METER MACHINE
$200000
S200e000'
REGENCY ENTERPRISES, INC.
SUPPLIES
$651.00
$651.00
STERLING CODIFIERS INC.
CODIFICATION
$39201.45
$39201.45:=
XEROX CORPo
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$105*84
$105.84
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/Z8/85
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$4000*29 REVENUE SHARING FUND
INVOICE AMOUNT
.A. A. `TOTAL %A.
14, le 141 lil
PAGE 4
TOTAL
$5t487oO4
$19186#75
-4. .i .#. * -4. J. J. 46 --. * J. .0- -4. 4, -10, 4, * J..., " J,4. J. .1, -.. 4, 4 A. "p- A- %A- * %P6 -t. -%. — J. �8- * * -46 J. * * Jr &. .0, .%, * * F- * * * J. * 4, A. 4, -4. * 4� -1� .t..1. * .1 -r.. , A, --:
1�41 a- .1. 4, %,•-6�. %' g-• 'IV, IN, IV, le 1%, le .M le IV- * 1#1 Alol 141 101 14- ft". ftp-- * J. ft, N, ft, IV- ft. It, IV, IV, ft, ft, -e Ot- -.r �%- N, 14, •-w-
RISK MANAGEMENT
ARTHUR J GALLAGHFR CO INS* RENEWAL 85/86FY $89533 00
INS* RENEWAL 85/86FY $18v210*00 $269743*00
VILLAGE OF MaPoEMPLOYEE HEALTH BENE CHECKS RELEASED BY FORT DEAR BORN 2/15 $61562*66
CHECKS RELEASED BY FT. DEARBORN 21221 S 5 v 8 13 o 8 8 $129376*54"
RISK MANAGEMENT -**TOTAL-" $399119 54
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $399119*54
.A !f A. * .,� .00 k. .6. J. .0. * J. .2. 46 * �A, 'A. .2, .4. J. J. J. J. *
"yo, N, I*, ft, 'N' N, %, ft, Ir••
J. *A. * * * J. 4, A.... J. #- 4- J. 46 Jr Aw 1- 4- .4- Aw 46 #- *
14, 1w, 10, 19, IN, le 10, ft, le ft,
J. --- J. J. J. k, A. F, 4- A. 4, A. A. .0k, J. pb * -At. 41-46 A. J6 46 J. J.
1�1 19% Is, 10 1., a* A, li, 14, '611%, ft, ft, * Id, 10 4-. 16, it %N 19,
It, �+.:..• . J. J. J. 4 -
110, le ft, *a, --c 11w, oil
POLICE DEPARTMENT
THOMAS ACOS
UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT
$150 O0
$150*00
DON ANDERSON
SUPPLIES
$94. 15
*94o15
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
LOCKS KEYS
$81*28
KEYS
$9*00
*90928
BERKEY CAMERA SHOP
FILM PROCESSING
$172*87
$172 87
THE CONSTABLE EQUIPMENT CO.
SUPPLIES
$41*46
$41*46
COOK & RILEY INCORPORATED
SUPPLIES
$220950
$220*50
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
SUPPLIES
$327*58
$327a58
FREDRIKSEN E SONS
SERV ICES RENDERED
544e00
$44s00
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
$403900
1403*00
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
HEWL FTT PACKARD
HONEY REE SNACK SHOP
I B M. CORPORATION
I
I AOI S ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF POLICE
JACK LEMASTER
LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
MULT ICOM INC*
NORTH SURv ASSOC* OF CHIEFS OF POLI
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
N4ORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPARTMENT
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
POSTMASTER MT PROSPECT
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
JOHN E. REID C ASSOCIATES
Sk�- Y KLEEN CORPORATION
M1 EL S EMK I U
TU-,. CnMMUNICATIONSI INC.
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA/CHAMP
WINK ELMANS RADIATOR CO
XEROX CORPORATION
POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/85
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
LEASE AGREEMENT
PRISONER FOOD/ FEB. 85
MONTHLY PAYMENT/ COPIER
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/ 3/1-3/31
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT
SUPPLIES
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
EQUIPMENT RENTAL.
1985 MEMBERSHIP
TRAINING EXPENSE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
POSTAGE FOR METER MACHINE
STRAYS FOR JAN.
SEMINAR EXPENSE
REPAIR CHARGES
CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICES RENDERED
SUPPLIES
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
SUPPLIES
$79252.03
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$521*58
$521.53
59175
$9175
$275*89
$275089
$49.50
$4450
$100.00
$100.00
$150.00
$150.00
$66.95
$66.95
$45w00
$85000
$130.00
$77.00
$77.00
$2000
$20.00
$100.00
$100000
$17.40
$3006
S20.46
$181.66
$181*66'
$10000
►10.00-:=
$200.00
$200.00:=
►345.00
$345.00
$11600.00
$1 9600.00
$190.50
$190.50
$12.00
$12.00
$11257oOO
$1,257.00
$150x00
$150.00
$45.00
$45.00
$113.90
$113.90
-xMy T0TAL=" $7.252903
,L .4 .+w .+. J..+.. J. >r- .rte 'rte moi:J..rw .+..+� .4 .+' J- .4 "" -...4 .!� .R..t..tw d. �R..t ..4 moi.. .4 L ..iw •. 1.11...+ J. . . .4 Je
a +. a• .a. .a..a..a. wa �a ". 'a le .a..y "a .a .,y � .• .. � as .. d + .4 4 J. d. 4 � w J, .+. Jw .4 J..+..J�..tw .4 1a J..4 .4 .+r .,� .M � +w .fiw d .iw .. .i..i ..w
.,... ti t 4..a. s... sa. • .a wr..a..a. y. wa..a. -e �. wa N. i "�'l . . i. wa..i..a.:y .a..yI N, .+ 'a.:�. a ,. Jr h J: Jw .+. .4 t,
..y wa. .i "r• a p •+ .a M .1 wa. wa .y..+ i ti..a. s. ay. y..a. 'i, .% ti. �. *�
.� waw y. ,�...�.:i. wa..i..i wa. y. '4. '., M ti. !...a. -w-
FIRE
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
AERO SUPPLY PAINT L SUPPLIES $126612 $126.12
VENDOR
FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT*
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
BARSON CHEMICAL CO
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
BUSS E HARDWARE
EDWARD CAVELLO
Cr `X WELDING FABRICATING
C4 NWEALTH EDISON
DUPLEX TRUCK DIVISION
MICHAEL FIGOLAH
FIRE INVESTIGATORS STRIKE FORCE
GREG FORD
GLAZEBROOK FIRE EQUIPMENT INC.
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
IBM
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION
ILL. FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC* 1985 CONFER
INDUSTRIAL GAS E EQUIPMENT
LONNIE JACKSON
KAR PRODUCTS INC
KELLY SERVILES • INC.
P :IMBALL TRAVEL. INC.
J. LILHT
ME SC O
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
MOBILE MUSIC
HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
NIBN.LE
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/85
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CREDIT CARD PURCHASES
$84*23
$84.23
SUPPLIES
$74a50
$74.50
PARTS
$61 00
x61.40
SUPPLIES
538 44
$38o44
SEMINAR EXPENSE
$3500
$3500
VEHICLE REPAIRS/FD
$91018
x91.18
ELECTRIC SERVICE
$7#07
$7.07
PARTS
$1237
$12.37
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
$76 50
x76*50
1985 DUES
$25*00
525.00
TRAINING
$450 00
$450.00
EQUIPMENT
$224.28
$224.28
WHEELS & SUPPLIES
$159w04
$ 159.04
MEDICAL EXAM
$140*00
$140.00
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT/ 3/1--3/31
$712 67
$712 67
SEMINAR EXPENSE
$375*00
$375*00
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$80.00
$80.00
SUPPLIES
$17 50
$17.50
SEMI/VAR EXPENSE
$35.00
$35.00
MISC PARTS
$149.50
5149.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$102*30
SERVICES RENDERED
$209 25
$311 * 55
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$178.00
$178s00
PAINT SUPPLIES
$42.50
SUPPLIES
$2 50
$45.00
REPAIRS
$78*35
$78.35
PARTS
$90.00
PARTS
$120.00
$210000
SUPPLIES
512w54
$12.50
PARTS
$26 55
MISC PARTS
$2404
PARTS
$11 87
PARTS
$169.11
$227.57
SUBSCRIPTION
$26.95
$26.95
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$15995
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$12,76
VENDOR
FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128/85
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND $49981.18 REVENUE SHARING FUND
CAPITAL IMPRV. C REPL. FUND $51x.30
PAGE 7
INVOICE AMOUNT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LAWRENCE A. PA IRITZ
CONFERENCE EXPENSES
PE TY CASH - FIRE DEPARTMENT
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$54941
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$10.54
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH - MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$20000
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
PHYSIO -CONTROL
EQUIPMENT
PIC COMMUNICATIONSi INC.
RADIO REPAIRS
$77.50
RADIO REPAIRS
POSTMASTER MT PROSPECT
POSTAGE FOR METER MACHINE
SET LIQUID WASTE SYSTEMS, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
MI SC TOOLS
SUBURBAN BUILDING OFFICIALS CONFERE
SEMINAR EXPENSE
SUBURBAN GAS SALES
OXYGEN
TECHNICAL PUBLISHING
SUBSCRIPTION
DENNIS R. THI LL
CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION SERVIC
SERVICES RENDERED
DEL ULREICH
SEMINAR EXPENSE
Tp"- NIFORM CENTER
UNIFORMS
V PRINTERS INC.
FD/ANNUAL REPORT
XE_,z CORP.
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
ZEP MANUFACTURING CO.
SUPPLIES
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND $49981.18 REVENUE SHARING FUND
CAPITAL IMPRV. C REPL. FUND $51x.30
PAGE 7
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
$6.24
$34.95
$95.09
*95.09
$54941
=:
$10.54
=:
$4.58
$69.53"
$20000
:=
$3.31
$5 3 . *
3'y
j
$6,445oOO
(l
,t3 /O
69445 O
$77.50
$110950
$188.00
$50000
$50.00.=
$50.00
$50*00
$51.30
$51*30
$130 * 00
$130.00
$56.50
S56*50
$59.80
x59.80
$53.54
$53.54
$20.00
$20.00
$35.00
`b35 *00
S47. 50
$47950
$72.50
$72.50
$51.53
151.53
$73.50
$73.50
*�*TOTAL#I%= $119701.37
$6f668,89
t '! • a+s '!rt. .t. al. �+. .;.. ;• �..+..!...i• :!. .t. ,+a •!. �..i♦ w+. w+..y. w+a a ♦ w ,. ♦tia .ia a` a ..4a ..M...r.. wa .+ra ..A.. w Jw ♦ .Ja .ir .t,. .!. .ri..!!ra J�w. .�4 .J!�.:++r. J�w..:�wa .�4. �+!... �, iiw a
.r!.r wa+.a .w!:.4 .!r...+.S .+. :+e •L ar Jw .qtr a+w .y .+w .+r a .tr .s..tw J.. : tr d...+r.. �.
..r. ...J..
i!+a .i. .+iw ryrt. w:.b Jtr.'."aa.!�.a....y0+i.a.!.w ...
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL OISPATCH SYSTEM SERVICES FOR MARCH 85 $19040.92 $19,940.9? *
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/85
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
s19,940v92
INVOICE AMOUNT
IV, 14* IV,
-TOTAL L--k-
PAGE 8
TOTAL
$199940.92
p. J_ .41. .0, . 0,► -A, P. .0. A, * -A, .0. A- A, -A- -Po .6, -A, -8� -A, A..'. -o..4
4. "'� '4. 'ift
V V V v- • ft. le IV, • 'v- -e -i. -e lVk 14, *il I., I%* 'wl _,c 1. 1%, It* 1*1 1%, h..w,y.Ism, IV,
HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION
BERKEY CAMERA SHOP
FILM
525*80
$25*80
BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES
REFUSE COUNT FOR JAN*
S1079955o02
-it,
S107v955*02'
LEE WAYNF COMPANY* INC*
SUPPLIES
$826.87
$826*87
PETTY CASH — MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$20000
$65*18
PETTY CASH — MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$25*00
$9e3lle
'-
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$97*78
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$94 40
$237.18;' -
PHOTO TOWNS
FILM C SUPPLIES
$79 73
179*73
PUBLIX UFFICE SUPPLIES INC*
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$151*20
$151020
XEROX CORPORATION
MONTHLY CHARGE
$172 50
$172*50
HF111TH SERVICES DIVISION
'#--*TOTAL"
$1099448 30
GENERAL FOND
$1099448030
J. -+..+..+. .#. -0. .2. ... .0. -.. .*' *- .0, -4. J. J. 'd. .A. -A. .4. -6. .A. A. ,. A. --- -"o 'A. .6' .0.
... -01 '4' 1-1 't' '41 's . -.. . .. .. e '. '%. ". e '. '. ". ". '� %►-
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
BIRKS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
SENIOR CAB RIDES
$261w00
SENIOR CAB RIDES
$243*00
$504*00
VIVIAN LEONARD
NOM DRIVERS RFIMBURSEMENT
$3 OO
$3 00"=
NORTHWFST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$65*18
$65*18
PETTY CASH — MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
59e31
$9e3lle
'-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/85
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
*1 1�1 N, -I#- -%I'-
41"TOTAL"" $581 *49
\GENERAL FUND
$581o49
.0, A..1, .4. .4 .0,
•
*46 P. *,A, -A- .R. .0, .0k. 41.► .06, 4. A.
46 .p. -6 .Al 4. -46 J.. 14. 'o- 4.
A%% IN*
o. J, 4- -F,
N, Ili, lb, ft, 11, 11`
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
9 H INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$53*89
$53*89
BERKEY CAMERA SHOP
PHOTO PROCESSING
$6e30
$b. 30
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
FICA PAYMENT 02/14/85
$141* 22
$141w224
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY SERVICES. INC*
SERVICES RENDERED JAN* 85
$916*00
$916*00
PLANNING RESOURCES
SERVICES RENDERED
$508*75
$508*75
SUBURBAN TRIM E GLASS CO.
DOORS
$21293*00
$21293*00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
*"-*TOTAL"-*
$39919*16
'!GENERAL FUND
$515o05 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GT
S39404all
M -e
1a1 a, li, a. I* -.a.:!. 1#1 "a, It, le
o
N. It, -11 1, 61 's, 'v, 'f* Y Oti tiL
STREET DIVTSTON
AMERICAN TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$19268*56
1 v 2 6 8 5 6
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
KEYS LOCKS
$29*50
$29*50
ATLAS MATERIAL HANDLING FQUIPMENT9
MTSC SUPPLIES
$49*40
PARTS
$13974
$63*14
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$29490e00
SUPPLIES
$242*70
SUPPLIES
$3488 9O
SUPPLIES
$52e50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/85
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION_
SUPPLIES
$551*25
$39695.35
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
MTSC SUPPLIES
$255w29
$255929
CITY UNIFORM
UNIFORMS
$49 35
$49*35
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
ELECTRIC SERVICE—nIST* 214 PROJECT
$120*46
$120o48
COOK & RILEY INCORPORATED
SUPPLIES
*220e50
$220.54
DF 'R SUPPLY CU.
SUPPLIES
$19063 00
519063*00
D aR INDUSTRIESp INC&
SALT
$425o96
SALT
$5,000*00
SALT
s5v632*60
SALT
$3,692*19
$149750e75
FPEAN DnMESTIC CAR SERVICE
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
X6404 00
$400*00
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
SUPPLIES
$151*50
$151*50
TBBOTSON HEATING COo
SERVICES RENDERED
S138m00
$138*00
-T-LLI--N-Ol&--F-WD--T-RUCK--&---E-0-U-IRME-NT--C-OM-P
-MI-SC---P--ART-S
$19350a,43
MISC PARTS
5405,*59
MISC PARTS
$69*96
I1i825a98
INPERIAL SERVICE SYSTEMS, INC*
SERVICES RENDERED
$2*031*00
SERVICES RENDERED
$25 00
%2v056a00
MELS Jo JOHNSON
TREE TRIMMING PROGRAM
$59494*35
TREE TRIMMING PROGRAM
$19925,*05
TREE REMOVAL PROGRAM
$252*00
$79671*40
MAS
1985 MEMBERSHIP
$10000
-sl0000
M "ROSPECT ALUMINUM SIDING CO,,
SERVICES RENDERED/Re MRYCZKO
$600000
$600*00
Mt- JN GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
S65 00
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
$22000
$87,00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
GAS SERVICE
$147o98
$147*98
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
544e24
*44*24
OHM/ELECTRONICS
PARTS
$34*80
$34e80
PATTEN ENERGY SYSPFMt INC*
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
580000
$80400
PETTY CASH — FIRE DEPARTMENT
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$2e90
52o90"
PETTY CASH — PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$27*87
z
TRAVEL. F. SUPPIIFS
$120?9
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$13*12
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$3,12
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$8*65
TRAVEL E SU P P L I FS
12-028
$67*33"
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT INC.
SNAP --ON TOOLS CORPORATION
STANIDARD PIPE SUPPLY INC.
S BARD RUBBER PRODUCTS COO
T SYN CORPORATION
TIRE CONNECTIONS INC.
z
TRI -R SIGNS
TRI SERVICE COMPANY
TUFF-KOTE DINUL
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
WESTERN ENGINE COMPANY
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
STREET DIVISION
`GENERAL FUND
�10TOR FUEL TAX FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT HATE 2/28/85
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
UNIFORMS
$26.00
$26.00
TOOLS
$41.37
$41.37
MISC SUPPLIES
$54.80
$54*80
PARTS
$154.00
$154.00
PARTS
$24.04
$24.04
TIRE REPAIRS
549.50
$49.50
SUPPLIES
$260.00
$260900
SERVICES RENDERED
$102.50
$358952
SERVICES RENDERED
$71.00
$52.08
SERVICES RENDERED
$1.452.26
SUPPLIES
SERVICES RENDERED
5382.76
$21008.52
SERVICES RENDERED
$185.00
' 185.00
SUPPLIES
$29740*05
$29740.05
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
$1 f 525.96
$19525.96
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
$90.00
$90000
***TOTALS ti- $41 *982.29
$269491#17 REVENUE SHARING FUND $1,556.84
$13.553.80 CAPITAL IMPRV. L REPL* FUND $380 48
.4, d. d .*. d. ,.L. s4 +. +, J- , - e ..r- .•y : ; .L J-. wy w4 .•..A= .y 4 .i. J...t4 * 14. •
'• .•. �"'.• .a" 'V` • .•. ti le r• •w .•..• :•. w =
�' t 'N V` 4* S 'f h 1w T iw 1 i '•w Y'
A. * .h d4 -t,. .ti d J..4. 1.. a 1. 0. .•. �-,..b d. A. _%. •. .t. +. 16 •r .•r .* ,•. .•.
w le w!. . a 1r A. �. le a ?..t. .�..+:.h.
tiw it 'N i i` � 1 4' .t. ti. 'y'" 4Z 4..rw Y yw r•w •4r" -11 -41 1 ii..y..�..�..4.. f .yw h. �..•. v, 1#1 ri..�. i. ry. h i '�w r�..�i
w•. • . s .4 .
.4. �.. r Jr �y J. 4 . s .+t..rr -1. .M
� ha ?y't �C y. 4C '�w hw ram M M hw "s.1 'yw 'Y' .s" '�!. i•"
1..+..•..•..•v .•..i. .. J..+....e..•.
hw .•. �..•. r+..•..•. esw .i. yw N. .•. �w
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ALEX ANDEP. CFJFMICAL CORP*
LIQUID CHLORINE
$39358.75
$39358.75
BERKEY CAMERA SHOP
FILM PROCESSING
$31.23
631.23
BERRY BEARING CO
PARTS
"5316.80
PARTS
$41.72
$358952
BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE
SUBSCRIPTION
$52.08
152.08
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$242.70
SUPPLIES
$100.00
SUPPL1 ES
S392w 25
$734.95
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
CHF,M RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CITY UNIFORM
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDI SON
CC TNENTAL IL •NAT eBANKETRUST OF CH
C COUNTY COLLECTOR
COuN E RILEY INCORPORATE[
COTSIRILOS E CROWLEY, LTD
FRANK DELUCA
DREI S I LK MOTnRS
DYNA—TITE CORPORATION
EEH UTILITY SALES, INC.
THE ECONOMICS PRESS$ INC.
FREDRIKSEN SONS
THE HERALD, PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
HOYL E ROAD EQUIPMENT COO
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK E EQUIPMENT COMP
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
KELLY SERVILES9 INC.
LA` NNE—WESTERN COMPANY• INC.
N ). TOOLS/ NEAL WOLF
NL AERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHSIDE INTERNATIONAL
NOVA K E PARK Ek INC*
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC,.
PETTY CASH -- PUBLIC WOPKS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT GATE 2/28/35
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MI SC SUPPLIES
$34#50
534.50
UNIFORMS
'4935
$49.35
ELECTRICAL ENERGY/WELL PUMPS
553,645.09
$53,645.09'
ELECTRIC SERVICE
$75*79
ELECTRIC SERVICE
S100o05
$175*84
VILLAGE SHARE WATER SUPPLY
$799533.58
6799 533 58=.=
1984 TAXES/ LANG LOT
$545.61
$545*61"
SUPPLIES
$220* 50
SUPPLIES
$220 o 5O
$441.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$1:115.00
$119'115,00
SHOE ALLOWANCE
$50.00
!b50.00
PARTS
$16,E 24
$16.24
PARTS
562.15
$62.15
PARTS
S523o94
5523.94
HOOKS
525.39
$25 39
SUPPLIES
$151450
5151.50
SUBSCRIPTION 2/11-4/16
$18 71
$18 71
PARTS
$528.95
$52895
MISC PARTS
$1,350*43
519350.43
FICA PAYMENT 02/14/85
$19789.64
S197R9w64ti=
SERV ICES RENDERED
$133e40
$133 4 1
PARTS
62 , 610.62
$2 9 610 62
TOOLS
$34080
134.80
GAS SERVICE
$375.22
GAS SERVICE
$151 71
GAS SERVICE
579071
GAS SERVICE
$21 * 17
GAS SERVICE
$54059
$871.40
PARTS
$126.02
$126*02
SUPPLIES
%19.54
$19*50
OFFICE SUPPLIES
534 55
*34.55
TRAVFI. E Sl1PPl IFS
$3 3.1 1
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$2.44
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
x7.19
=•
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$12x00
=:
TRAVEL E SUPPI I FS
$9*63
=i=
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/85
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
s7*79
$24*00
$45. q7
$120025
5377.59
$250 00
$50*00
$193.00
$55oOO
$26-000
$13*30
$530*68
$95.90
$16e18
$729000
$115.00
$104*80
Mmffl��
.0- * .A..0-
V
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PAGE 13
TOTAL
yw
$267*384
le
t67• 57"
$193*00
$55e00
s26o00
$13*30
$530968
195.90
$16*18
$729*00
$115*00
$104980
$151t246e57
cummnNWEALTH EDI SON ELECTRIC SERVICE $19a36
ELECTRIC SERVICE $451*08
ELECTRIC SERVICE $17*36
ELECTRIC SERVICE $23e56 $511*36
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIRFMFNT FUND FICA PAYMENT 02/14/85 $68e29 $68.29:=
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION4'#'s-TOTAL1#1" 14, 65
h` 'r` 'tom
% 579 s
TRAVEL C SUPPLIFS
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL L SUPPLIES
PIASTER MT PROSPECT
POSTAGE PERMIT/WATER. BILLS
POSTAGE FOR METER MACHINE
1985 PRESORT FIRST CLASS FEE
HENRY PRATT CO.
MISC PARTS
PROCS INTERNATIONAL
SUPPLIES
PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT INC*
UNIFORMS
SCHMERLER FORD INC*
PARTS
R.G. SMITH EQUIPMENT CO*
PARTS
STEINER FLECTRIC
PARTS
TIRE CONNECTIONS INC..
TIRE REPAIRS
TONE COMMUNICATIONSt INC*
SERVICES RENDERED
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
VEHICLE REPAIRS/PW
ZIEbELL WATER SERVILE PRODUCTSt INC
SUPPLIES
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER L SEWER FUND — OLM
$1519246*57
INVOICE AMOUNT
s7*79
$24*00
$45. q7
$120025
5377.59
$250 00
$50*00
$193.00
$55oOO
$26-000
$13*30
$530*68
$95.90
$16e18
$729000
$115.00
$104*80
Mmffl��
.0- * .A..0-
V
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PAGE 13
TOTAL
yw
$267*384
le
t67• 57"
$193*00
$55e00
s26o00
$13*30
$530968
195.90
$16*18
$729*00
$115*00
$104980
$151t246e57
cummnNWEALTH EDI SON ELECTRIC SERVICE $19a36
ELECTRIC SERVICE $451*08
ELECTRIC SERVICE $17*36
ELECTRIC SERVICE $23e56 $511*36
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIRFMFNT FUND FICA PAYMENT 02/14/85 $68e29 $68.29:=
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION4'#'s-TOTAL1#1" 14, 65
h` 'r` 'tom
% 579 s
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/85
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $579 65
-A, .-, .6 -0 .t..*r --. .-- .4. ... ;%. 4., .0� .4. ffi..4- ,.+:.F..4 -P. .-. .0. *. .0- a4-0. -4. -0 . 4. -.. -ft. A. * A. *..+ ., "'. 4, .0. .k. A. -4. .0- -0-
,)�, -W, lv� I.: It, It, 14, It, s+..•, I*, 'y..+, s+..+..+. 'i" '11, '1" -4. ft,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
8 A INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$11*68
X11 68
C NWEALTH EDISON
MUNICIPAL STREET LIGHTING/DEC
*79360*56
STREETqHWY9 E TRAFFIC LIGHTING/DEC
$49373olO
$119733 66'
PETTY CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
%l3w69
513e69'
XEROX CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$180*10
$180010
FNGINEERING DIVISION
T 0 T A L `4 =
$119939o13
GFNERAL FUND
$79566 03 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
t49373*10
1.'.. ......+..+:..+..+. 1..+..+..+r .4, .4, -.A. -4, -.1. -i..0r .0. J. J. A. J- -#: -0- -%. -it- -k. A- .1. -4 .P- p. -6- t, .0- -0. ". 'k, 0- * -". J. _u -.0, %� J. .6...+r .0- Ai .01� Jr J fi40 .41 'o. .0..+. .*- .. J% .. J- j .8. .0. ". .6. .11, A, 4., �1, �ffi, .*, .0, k #, 0, ,*, #
'o, %, .* 'I- -., -*. -., .0. .. .0. #, -A,' ., ... .a,
PENSION FUNDS
I 10IS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND FICA PAYMENT 02/14/85 *6035*77 $6*835#77'.
PENSION FUNDS TOTAL*" $69835o77
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $69835e77
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL s789?712s91
. . . . . . . .......................... . .. . . .......... . . . . . . . .............
Prct jaycees AFFILIATIONS:
0S I
pe.
P.O. BOX 27 0 MT. PROSPECT, ILL. 60056 ILUNOIS JAYCEES U.S. JAYCEES JAYCEE INTERNATIONAL
February 10, 1985
Mr. Terry Burghard
Village Manager
Village of Mt. Prospect
Mt. Prospect, IL. 60056
Dear Mr. Burghard,
The Mt, Prospect Jaycees have made application to hold a carnival
at the Mt. Prospect Shopping Plaza from Wednesday, May 22 through
May 27, 1985.
As you know, proceeds from the Jaycee fund raising activities are
returned to the community in one form or another. We therefore,,
request your consideration in helping us maximize these funds by
waiving all permit fees normally accessed under the local village
statute except out-of-pocket expenses.
Thank you for your continuing support of the Jaycees.
Very truly yours,
"FRED STEINM IT T
J-J"ER
Mt. Prospect Jaycees
„ ,,,,,,,
00 �
DO P—j F�1-7— �� d
W V C/jt o (as �
2 0
w
2
a
walr�M
��7!
�� e m .� iii i W „an . 11
GT O
5
MillI
r� o
„
7
b
Orr
0
J
” '' " 12
m
13
13
, b
�" "� �iQ7 TLS- %,,,.. " �,E/*' S � � � a � °W • � r'
'[
a' W 14
� m
I
115
17
18 v ofl
18
19,
" i1M M Y
19
20
M
m
v. o
I io � I '
20
21 ` �9
�...� " 21
22 pp
23,x;,
p23
24
.�w
m„
........ .
�ry25
25
23 g I
27 o.
2
rz V
28
,
29
n
3 9 Y {pV�II�
� n
ry I
30
Vu fl mA
3)
32"
„
32
3333 «� r
o�
34p
34
5
'
35
36 I
0' m gw m 35
a
TF
tT
x
38',.
,
1� 38
3939µ
1
_.
982 M.A D E IN U S A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
Mount Prospect, Illinois*
Hearing Date: August 28, 1980
Report Date % August 29, 1980
To: TLr'i HONORABLE MAYOR ACED THE VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTE'ES,
From:
The Zoning Board of Appeals
References
ZEA -39-V-80
Petitioners
Raymond Go Hoven, 733 Lee Street,, Des Plaines, IL,
Property:
701 Eo Prospect Ave* (Zoning Map 19-8)
Applications
A.
The petitioner is requesting the follovdng variations:
o More than one main use for a single owner with two
separate companies;
o To reduce the number of off-street parking spaces
A.
from the required 84 spaces to 4550 spaces;
o To eliminate truck loading spaces;
o To continue to provide off-street parking in the
required front yard;
o To reduce the size of off-street parking spaces from
101 X20, to 9t X201•
Notice Publisheds
August 8, 1980
Neighbors Notified:
August 8, 1980
Discussion:
The property in this application is, currently, zoned Light
Industry* The building has housed the operations of Trade Service Publications
for over 15 years.
resented
The petitioner his case stating t',,,.e building would be used for
office and computer operations as opposed to a light manufacturing operation v�hich
uses, of necessity, trailer truck pickup and deliveries. Although there will be a
24 hour operation the 2nd & 3rd shift will be computer operations only vrith 6 to 8
employees* Added spaces in the front yard was to keep employee's cars off of the
public street and because of the limited number of employees the operations of
both companies only required 50 spaces* In this connection the petitioner stated
that he had no objection to a "No Parking Zone" on Edwards Street adjacent to the
property.
Approximately ten neighbors voiced, and submitted two letters,
their objections for well in excess of one hour. Main concern appeared to center
on the requested two uses of the building fearing future expansiong, and the lowering
of property values,* The endangering of children by employees parking on �,dwards St.
was of concern* The petitioner attempted to address the concerns of the objectors
by pointing out the upgrading of landscaping, lack of truck traffic Rnd an office
type facility as opposed to light manufacturing*
Page 29 ZBA-39-V-80, HearinLr Date August 28, 1980
Findings on Variations:
The consensus of the Board wqs that:
o The proposed variations Wili not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to other property or
improvements in the neighborhood.
o The proposed variations vrill not impair an adequate supply
of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increase
congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire,
or enganger public safety.
o The proposed variations will not alter the essential character
of the neighborhoodo
Recommendations;
Five motions were made and voted on in this case as follows:
o A motion was made by Ronald Cassidy, seconded by George Van
Geem, that a recornendation. be made to the Village board to approve more than one
main use of -che property* By a vote of 4 to 2 the motion was approved*
r'l
o A motion was made by Ralph Arthur, seconded by George Van
Geem to recommend. - to - ,the Village Board, that off-street paricing be continued in the
required front yards By a vote of 5 to 1 the motion was anproved.
o A motion was made by Ronald Cassidy, seconded by Ralph Arthur,
that a recommendation be made to the Tiilage Board,, to reduce of parking spaces
from the required, because of building square foott..ge, 8.4 spaces to 50 spaces. By a vo-,;e
of 2 to 4 the motion was not approved*
o A motion was made by George Van Geem, seconded by Leonard
Petrucelli, thtt a recommendation be made to the Village Board, to approve the
elimination of truck loading spaces* By a vote of 4 to 2 the motion was approved*
o A motion was made by Ronald Cassidy, seconded by Ralph Arthur,
thL-t a recommendation be made to tl:- Village Board, to approve 91 X 201 spaces* By a
vote of 4 to 2 the motion on parking spaces was approved.
Irman 1�
Ac-�;inlg Secretary
MIOTION 1 MOT-LON 2 IT&TION 3 I%IOT.AI.*ON 4 11.10 1 0 N 5
AM MA_ Y TYE NWY 17E NTWT =hhh�"71A-Y -A7Y Z TI'AY
Ralph Arthur x x x x x x x x
Gilbert Basnik x x
Lois Brothers x A x x x
Ronald Cassidy x x x x
Leonard Petrucelli x x x x x
George Van Geem x x x x x
cc: Director of Community Develo-oment
Petitioner
Tlilage Clerk
Village Manager
Zoning Board Members
1 01
WHEREAS, the month of March is Camp Fire Service Month;
and
WHEREAS, March, 1985 marks the 75th Anniversary of the
Camp Fire Organization in the nation; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of Camp Fire is to provide
opportunities for our youth to realize their potential
by teaching responsibility, respect, and self-confidence,
to encourage family involvement, and in general to develop
moral and ethical values in our youth; and
WHEREAS, we recognize and encourage the continued support
given by those involved with Camp Fire - volunteering
their time, energy and experience for the betterment of
our youth; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Camp Fire Organization will
be celebrating their 58th Anniversary in March, 1985,
reflecting the many years of involvement by our residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Carolyn H. Krause, Mayor of the Village
of Mount Prospect, do proclaim the month of March, 1985 as
CAMP FIRE SERVICE MONTH in the Village of Mount Prospect
and congratulate Camp Fire, and all the dedicated volunteers,
leaders and our youth, and do encourage continued support
for Camp Fire.
ATTEST:
Carolyn H. Krause
Mayor
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated: March 5, 1985
a
23595
WHEREAS, pursuant to a certain Plat of Subdivision known as the
Hiawatha Trail Subdivision, dated August 1, 1956, and recorded
August 7. 1956 as document No. 16661912 in the office of the Cook
County Recorder a certain Lot, commonly known as 208 West Hiawatha
Trail, was set aside and dedicated to the Village of Mount Prospect;
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 4-66 adopted by the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and subsequently
recorded on January 25, 1966, as document No. 19720841 in the otfice
of the Cook County Recorder, said dedicated Lot was accepted by the
Village; and
WHEREAS, said property, as hereinafter described, has been held
and used by the Village as an access area to and from Weller Creek
Drainage Ditch for maintenance purposes, and it is the determination
of this Village that a 20 foot easement area long said property
would be sufficient for such access and maintenance purposes; and
WHEREAS, the remaining part of said property is no longer
necessary or useful for such municipal purposes and is therefore
surplus property and subject to sale; and
WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the President and Board of
Trustees of this Village a certain Real Estate Sale Contract by
McKone Builders, Inc. for the purchase of said property, as
hereinafter described, at a purchase price of $40,000 with the right
of the Village to reserve a 20 foot easement for access to and from
the Weller Creek Drainage Ditch (a copy of which ConCract is
attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance by reference); and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have secured an independent appraisal of the value of
said property and have determined that the purchase price offered
therefor at $40,000 is fair, reasonable and just; and
WHEREAS, it is further determined to be in the best interest of
the Village of Mount Prospect that said real estate be sold to
McKone Builders, Inc. in accordance with the Contract and pursuant
to the terms and conditions thereof, with the reservation by the
Village of a 20 foot wide access easement as provided in said
Contract.,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTYr ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth above are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby approve and accept the Real Estate Sale
Contract submitted by McKone Builders, Inc., for the purchase of
certain Village owned real estate, described as follows:
Part of Hiawatha Trail Subdivision, a part of
the Southwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 41
North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal
Meridian, described by metes and bounds as
follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of
the Southwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 41
North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal
Meridian; thence 196.45 feet East along said
South line of said Southwest 1/4 to a point;
thence North 0 degrees, 0 minutes, 40 seconds
East for a distance of 698.62 feet to the point
of beginning; thence 249.26 feet along a
prolongation of said last described line; thence
217.29 feet in a Southeasterly direction forming
an angle of 46 degrees, 41 minutes from said
249.26 foot side to the Northerly most corner of
Lot 1 as designated on a Plat recorded August 7,
1956 as document 16661912 in the office of the
County Recorder of Cook County; thence 140.34
feet in a Southwest direction along the longer
Westerly lot line of said Lot 1 to a point;
thence 96 feet along the arc of a curve convex to
the Northeast whose radius is 191 feet and whose
chord is 94.02 feet to the place of beginning,
all of said land being more fully described on
the plat of subdivision dated August 1, 1956 and
recorded as document 16661912 in the office of
the County Recorder in Cook County, Illinois*
The Village shall reserve unto itself a 20 foot wide access easement
across the eastern portion of said property for the purpose of
maintaining the Weller Creek Drainage Ditch. Said property shall be
acquired at a purchase price of $40,000.
SECTION THREE: The Village President and Village Clerk are
hereby authorized and directed to execute such Contract on behalf of
the Village of Mount Prospect, and the Village Attorney is hereby
authorized to undertake all necessary commitment and document
preparation requirements to conclude the sale and conveyance of the
subject property to McKone Builders, Inc*
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
upon its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in
accordance with law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1 1985.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
. . . . . . . .......... .. ---- . ... . ........
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE Z:OMPANY • ILLINOIS FOFUW-A-"
Ago&,
Real,,-,, s t a t e S a e o n c It
Mc&ne Builders, Inc.
(Purchaser)
agrees to purchase at a price of S 40 r,000 ,& 0 0 on the terms set forth herein, the following described real estate
in I L40= PMffQgg-t ,,, Cook County, Illinois:
See attached Rider for legal description of real estate and reservation of easement
terns
fff
"r toyle of emer"rim. is
authorized to insert thereafter.)
commonly known as 208 W. Hiawatha Trail,,_Munt Pro ffl2gLt., Illinois and
with approximate lot dimensions of .. V A I psasicatii� -1QcaWd-4he
x N/A .... tagethelF w.*;" Wll-ms;ng
ha" --y and
Lkl
44k"k4a,
r —7 -7 -7 -
ram
watar. saftionar.; (i) o r.,;.=t
2- ILUI= Of MMMIQ i (Seller)
(Insert names of all owners and their respective spouses)
agrees to sell the real estate and the property, if any, described above at the price and terms set forth herein, and to convey or cause to be conveyed to
Purchaser or nominee title thereto,( by a recordable , S93332MIZZ deed, Q-- em-a—d-fighsev
of sale, subject only to: (a) covenants, conditions and restrictions of record; (b) private, public and utility easements and roads and highways, if any; (c)
gft.*�4
P-145, WaU fights aAd,aWW�***,&,n&6J' W,as�4 (d) a ------- 4" so Oro "64001US046406, 1
A—* -
Gila',
44W,0441 if any; (i),general, taxes, for the year, and subsequent years
,01 bui I di= lines, drainage rightq
andeasement� to be reserved by Seller as set forth Jin attached Rider
3. Purchaser has, paid S L000"AQ ---rdays the addift*"i 1 -He 46 to searnest money to be
applied on the purchase price, and agrees to pay or satisfy the balance of the purchase price, plus or minus prorations, at the time of closing as follows:
(Strike subparagraph inapplicable)
(a) The payment of s 3,9 L 000.00 less title insurance gbar es, and other proratable items
q_
Purchaser [does] [does not] agree to assume) aggregating S, bearing interest at the rate of ,and the
payment of a sum which represents the difference between the amount due on the indebtedness at the time of closing an ane of the purchase
price.
4. This contract is subject to the condition that Purchaser be able to procure
days a firm commitment for a loan to be secured by a
mortgage or trust deed on the real estate in the amount of $ or such lesser sum as Purchaser accepts, with interest not to exceed
% a year to be amortized over tQdlission and service charges for such loan not to exceed If, after making
every reasonable effort, Purchaser is un bLptorocure such commitment within the time specified herein and so notified Seller thereof within that time,
this contract shall become :�voi'dand all I earnest money shall be returned to Purchaser-, provided that if Seller, at his option, within a like period of
time followiU�, aser's notice, procures for Purchaser such a commitment or notifies Purchaser that Seller will accept a purchase money mortgage
5. The time of closing shall be onb515a 1985 , or 20 days after notice that financing has been procured if above paragraph 4 is
operative, or on the date, if any, to which such time is extended by reason of paragraph 2 of the Conditions and Stipulations hereafter becoming operative
(whichever date is later), unless subsequently mutually agreed otherwise, at the office of Seller I s Atta= �,— ........... or
of the mortgage tender, if any, provided title is shown to be good or is accepted by Purchaser.
6.- Seller shall deliver possession to Purchaser on or before the dayiefter-the sale has been closed. Sel_e! a5tees te pay Patchasei, III&INA0.3"N.&A
ILI—
Will WA%F !i "I P""Smlt� it bee weerrthe ..X. �- &I the"Itirne p"Mmsimm is deh we.
7. Seller agrees to pay a broker's commission to No one. No ccmissiai is due on this salt-
NAAL I 51c;190 -Mft-'J-1.2JLTdCT U1 45 fbilOW5.
iltvkq 1111K1*1WL J
8. The earnest money shall be held by UM 14 J I 14 QZ 'CaMML 1:M,5Pe%ZL
for the mutual benefit of the parties.
9. Seller agrees to deliver possession of the real estate in the same condition as it is at the date of this contract, ordinary wear and tear excepted,
10. A duplicate original of this contract, duly executed by the Seller mid tli3 aFvUSC, if any, shall be delivered to the Purchasers within 2 . days
from the date below, otherwise, at the Purchaser's option, this contract shall become null and void and the earnest money shall be refunded to the
Purchaser.
This contract is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations set forth on the back page hereof, which Conditions and Stipulations are made a part of this
contract.
Dated F-02 b —rU A K YL 12. a - —19 8
•-Urchaser Vs. Ing.
Purchaserb-3z -.
Village o Teat Prospect Title
Seller
Village President
Seller Attest —A- - - - - -
-4- - . I-Vil,,lag, ,C�-LlEpz - A A
(Address) , 422.-Park"M
(Address)
(Address) 100 S. Bmerson Street
(Address) Mount Prospect, !L 60056
C10"'ONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
I Seller shall deliver or cause to be a Af
a��chaser or Purchaser's agent, not less th.- -YS prior to the time of closing, a title commitment for
)wner's title insurance policy issued by zheQ+a�+o Title Insurance Company in the amount of the purchase price, covering title to the real estate on or
the date hereof, showing title in the intended grantor subject only to (a) the general exceptions contained in the policy :s
ap (b) the title exceptions set forth above, and (c) title
exceptions pertaining to liens or encumbrances of a definite or ascertainable amount which may be removed by the payment of money at the time of
closing and which the Seller may so remove at that time by using the funds to be paid upon the delivery of the deed (all of which are herein referred to as
the permitted exceptions). The title commitment shall be conclusive evidence of good title as therein shown as to all matters insured by the policy, subject
only to the exceptions as therein stated. Seller also shall furnish Purchaser an affidavit of title in customary form covering the date of closing and showing
bide in Seller subject only to the permitted exceptions in foregoing items (b) and (c) and unpermitted exceptions, if any, as to which the title insurer
commits to extend insurance in the manner specified in paragraph 2 below.
2. If the title commitment discloses unpermitted exceptions, Seller shall have 30 days from the date of delivery thereof to have the exceptions removed
from the commitment or to have the title insurer commit to insure against loss or damage that may be occasioned by such exceptions, and, in such event,
the time of closing shall be 35 days after delivery of the commitment or the time specified in paragraph 5 on the front page hereof, whichever is later. If
Seller fails to have the exceptions removed, or in the alternative, to obtain the commitment for title insurance specified above as to such exceptions within
the specified time, Purchaser may terminate this contract or may elect, upon notice to Seller within 10 days after the expiration of the 30 -day period, to
take title as it then is with the right to deduct from the purchase price liens or encumbrances of a definite or ascertainable amount. If Purchaser does not so
elect, this contract shall become null and void without further actions of the parties.
"in M071,� debtedness, if any, and other similar items shall be adjusted ratably as of the time of closing. If the amount of the current general taxes is
e
> us t thereof .-ot then ascertainal e, iustment thereof shall be on the basis of the amount of the most recent ascertainable taxes. The amount of any general taxes
may
accrue
y r of tionail, improvements shall be adjusted as follows:
,vhich may accrue by reason of ne diti
All prorations are final unless otherwise provided herein. Existing leases an able insurance policies, if any, shall then be assigned to Purchaser.
Seller shall pay the amount of any stamp tax imposed by State law on the transfer a t, and, shall furnish a completed Real Estate Transfer
Declaration signed by the Seller or the Seller's agent in the form required pursuant to the Real Estate r, ax Act of the State of Illinois and shall
furnish any declaration signed by the Seller or the Seller's agent or meet other requirements as established by any local or i with regard to a transfer
or transaction tax; such tax required by local ordinance shall be paid by the party upon whom such ordinance places responsi,bi It or. If such
tire MM Vhzt-br P -Sid %.h! -- tpareftfter� (se
1,044A I
4. The provisions of the Uniform Vendor and Purchaser Risk Act of the State of Illinois shall be applicable to this contract.
5. If this contract is terminated without Purchaser's fault, the earnest money shall be returned to the Purchaser, but if the termination is caused by the
Purchaser's fault, then at the option of the Seller and upon notice to the Purchaser, the earnest money shall be forfeited to the Seller and applied first to
the payment of Seller's expenses J. * . . .
sehe balance, if any, to be retained by the Seller as liquidated damages.
escrow with Chicago Title and Trust Company, in accordance with the general provisions of the usual form of Deed an,,1:111111,151:11
114ero�!r"m�ent then
as may required to conform with this
in use by Chicago Title and Trust Company, with such special provisions inserted
contract. Upon the creation of such an escrow, anyth-1 ntrary notwithstanding, payment of purchase price and delivery of deed shall be
made through the escro escrow, an
earnest money shall be deposited in the escrow. The cost of the escrow shall be divided equally between
7. Time is of the essence of this contract.
3. All notices herein required shall be in writing and shall be served on the parties at the addresses following their signatures. The mailing of a notice by
rr.-gzistered, or certified mail, return receipt requested, shall be sufficient service.
9. Purchaser and Seller hereby agree to make all disclosures and do all things necessary to comply with the applicable provisions of the Real Estate
Settlement Procedures Act of 1974. In the event that either party shall fail to make appropriate disclosure when asked, such failure shall be considered a
breach on the part of said party.
10. This Contzact shall, be sub3ect to approval of' the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Nbunt, Prospect by adopt -ion, of an ordinance iin accordance, with t—he prOvisions
of Section 8.514 of Chapter 8, Article V of theVillage, code" of, Mount, Prospect,, illinois.
11. See attached Rider for dddi ional conditions and st-ipuiations.
vt 3772 R� 3 79 zip
0 5- 0 D`T
RIDER TO CONTRACT BETr4EEN MC XONE 3UILDER'S INC. AND
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
. 1-1 - ... . .....
Part of Hiawatha Trail Subdivision, a part of the Soutii,4est 1/4
of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third
Principal Meridian, described by metes and bounds as follows:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southwest 1/4,of Section
12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal
1,1eridian; thence 196.45 feet- East along said South line o -j'-:' said
Southwest 1/4 to a point- thence North 0 degrees, 0 minutes, 40
seconds East for a distance of 698.62 feet to the point of
beginning; thence 249.26 feet along a prolongation of said last
described line; thence 217.29 feet in a Southeasterly direction
forming an angle of 46 degrees, 41 minutes from said 249.20 T -00t
side to the Northerly most corner of Lot 1 as designated on a Plat
recorded August 7, 1956 as document 16661912 in the office of the
County Recorder of Cook County; thence 140.34 feet in a Southwest
direction along the longer Westerly lot line of said Lot 1 to a
point; thence 96 feet along the arc of a curve convex to the
Northeast whose radius is 191 feet and whose chord is 94.02 feet to
the place of beginning, all of said land being more fully described
on the plat of subdivision dated August 1, 1956 and recorded as
document 16661912 in the office of the County Recorder in Cook
County, Illinois's
..,.ASEMENT TEII:LIMS
The Village shall reserve unto itself an access ease-ment, of
twenty (20) feet in width along the easterly lot line of the abov,,=.,
described property for purposes of cleaning and maintenance of the
Weller's Creek Drainage Ditch pursuant to the following conditions:
1. Purchaser shall construct and providc,:1, the Village with a ramp
within the easement area, having a maximum slope of 12% and
running from ground level at the upper port -ion of the lot to the
Creek bed.
2. Village access on, upon and across the easement area shall be
suitable for use of trucks and other heavy equipment and said
area shall be free of trees, bushes, hedges, structures or other
he right to
C
obstructions, provided that Purchaser shall have t
improve and use the easement area for driveway purposes.
A. A.
3. Village shall not be liable for any loss or damage occ--msioned to
I
the paved or ground surface of the easement area or to ally
trees, shrubbery or plants contained therein as a r��siilt of
S.
Village use of the e I aske-M.1ent area; nor shall the Village �e
liable for any loss or da--,,aae occasioned. to the 7
er.-,sion, accretiQ n or L c aused b y t I-). e vrater f: r ig
through the said -rA7V e,1 el- r s Cr z -e k Drain a 9 e D, 31- 'L Chl c r
Village be responsible to replace, , repair or rEstk-ore
-4 o'
-It area lost ora : iLaqed
as the result cif
or the action o e r f10ng h s a
o
D 3
7.
-)V
A,.
C-
-I S S
r T
7
a t h
d 1 D y lt'l -1 t
ent x e C e
a stat
.0
P—L f ect that this '13- oyer understands the n t t ES
retain,e-d and reserved by the Viil�aqe he'rein,
'(--he Village shall be us 4 d ease-,r1-E--:nt IfOr C -access
s a i
L
e r ' s Creek Dral-nage Ditch for the pur-pose 04
3'-, a T`
31 - 1,-,, L 1= J
-L',e,L-eof, n d ce r sta n d s that the VJA_la ge, or
any I os s or damage to tlL-le ease.-,&-,,Pnt are -a a s a r - s u 1 t
L 7,
LIA S an,F r c) f off' e1 -c, s i o n 0 r
Cz
]3
ZD
L
Village of Rriount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: - TERRANCE L. BURGHARDv VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ZBA-56-V-84, JEROME BELTER
1825 MAGNOLIA LANE
DATE: FEBRUARY 14.. 1985 -
The petitioner is requesting a variation from the floor area
ratio in the R -A Residential District. The floor area ratio
maximum is 0.30 and the addition proposed by the petitioner would
increase this parcel to 0.32. A second variation involving an
encroachment in the side yard was within the limits of the
jurisdiction of the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Zoning Board
considered this case at their January 24 re ular meetinand
recommended approval by a vote of 6-0 for bogg
th variation
requests.
The staff had recommended approval of the variation request for
side yard encroachment, which has been granted. We questioned
the desire to continue to increase the floor area on a small R -A
District lot. The only 'hardship that had been identified was one
of aesthetic design,. The Zoning, Board of Appeals felt that the
var iation was minimal enough that no significant impact would be
involved on surrounding properties.
KHF: hg
. . . . . ............. ............ . .... . .. . . ........... . .. . . . ..........
MINI OF THE REGULAR MEETING
THE MOUNT ":e-±: OSPECT ZONING BOARD OF Ak��.ALS
ZBA Case No. 56-V-84 Hearing Date: December 27, 1984
Conti nued to
Petitioner: Jerome Belter January 24, 1985
Subeict Property: 1825 magnolia Lane
Publication Date., December 9, 1984
Request: Variation from Section 14.1202.B.1 to
permit 4' 8 side yard instead of 51 -
a variation from Section 14.203 to allow
a floor area ratio of 0.32 'Instead of the
required .30.
ZBA Members Present:, Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
John Green
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
ZBA Member Absent: Lois Brothers
le
Objp�ctors',. None
Steven Murray, representing the petitioner, presented the case
stating that Mr. Belter would like to construct an addition to
his single family home and that the placement of the addition
would require the requested variations.
Mr. ,,& Mrs. Belter have lived in this house since 1966 and it is
their desire to built this 620 square foot addition, which
would bring the total floor area to 2,280 square feet.
It was noted that due to the architectural design of the addition,
a green house effect window wall would encoach into the side yard
by 4 inches. Thos was basically"due to-desligninq the new wall
to be even with the existing wall. The size of the addition,
necessitating the variation for floor area, is due to the design
of existing doors and the desire of the netiti,oner to locate a
fire place in the addition.
The staff noted that the 4 inch encroachment was not a major
concern however the staff did feel that such a large addition was
not warranted due to the fact that the lot is small.
The petitioner noted that many home owners in the area have added
rooms to their homes.
A copy of the staff comments is attached to these minutes,
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mrs. OlMay, moved to grant the requested
ZBA 56-V-84
Page 2 of 2
variation to permit a 4 inch encroachment into the side yard,
and to grant the variation to permit the requested .32 f loor
area ratio.
Upon roll call: Ayes.* Brettragerl Cassidy, Green, O'May
Petrucelli, Bashlik
Nays: Wone
Motion carried.
The Zoning Board of Appeals is final on the request pertaining
to the encroachment, therefore, Mr. Cassidy, seconded by
Mr. Brettrager, moved to passage of Resolution Z -56--i,85.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The recommendation on the floor area ratio will be forwarded to
the Village Board for their consideration at the February 19, 1985
meeting' of the Village Board.
Carol A. Fields
Record ling Secretary
. ...... ... . .........
2390V
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR CERTAIN
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1825 MAGNOLIA LANE
IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, Jerome G. Belter and Sheila A. Belter have filed an
application for variation with respect to property commonly known as
1825 Magnolia Lane in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois (the
"Subject Property") ; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is described as follows:
Lot 448 in Elk Ridge Villa Unit No. 6, being a
subdivision of Lot 1 and part of Lot 2 in Edward
Busse's Division in the Southeast quarter of Section
15, Town.ship 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third
Principal Meridian according to the plat of said Elk
Ridge Villa Unit No. 6, registered in the Office of
the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, on
April 19, 1965, as Document Number 2204321.
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek the following variation from
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, to allow an increase in the maximum floor area ratio as
provided in Section 14.1203 of Article XII of Chapter 14 from .30 to
.32 to allow the erection of an addition to Petitioners residence
property; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation request
(designated as Case No. ZBA-56-V-84) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
December, 1984, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Pros2ect Herald on the 28th day of November, 1984; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has approved Petitioners
additional request for a variation from the side yard requirements
of Section 14.1202.8.1 to allow the encroachment of the proposed
building addition into the side yard leaving a side yard area of
four feet eight inches (418") instead of the required five feet
(5'); and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect to allow the requested variation, and the
President and Board of Trustees of said Village have given further
consideration to the variation request and have determined that the
same satisfy the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, and this Board further finds that
it would be in the best interest of the Village to grant the request
for variation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION -ONE ' - The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the variation
requested with respect to Section 14.1203, of Article XII, Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, to allow an
increase in floor area ratio from .30 to .32,
56-V-84, 2 of 2
SECTION '"ION THEE'1 Except for the variation granted herein, all
other applicable `Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and Regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full farce and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1985.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
VILLAGE CLERK
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR CERTAIN
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1825 MAGNOLIA LANE
IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, Jerome G. Belter and Sheila A. Belter have filed an
application for variation with respect to property commonly known as
1825 Magnolia Lane in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois (the
"Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS,r the Subject Property is described as follows:
Lot 448 in Elk Ridge Villa Unit No. 6, being a
subdivision of Lot 1 and part of Lot 2 in Edward
Busse's Division in the Southeast quarter of Section
15, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third
Principal Meridian according to the plat of said Elk
Ridge Villa Unit No. 6, registered in the Office of
the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, on
April 19, 1965, as Document Number 2204321.
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek the following variation from
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, to allow an increase in the maximum floor area ratio as
provided in Section 14.1203 of Article XII of Chapter 14 from .30 to
.32 to allow the erection of an addition to Petitioners residence
property; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation request
(designated as Case No. ZBA-56-V-84) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
December, 1984, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Pros ]2ect,Herald on the 28th day of November,, 1984; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has approved Petitioners
additional request for a variation from the side yard requirements
of Section 14.1202.B.1 to allow the encroachment of the proposed
building addition into the side yard leaving a side yard area of
four feet eight inches (418") instead of the required five feet
(5'); and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect to allow the requested variation, and the
President and Board of Trustees of said Village have given further
consideration to the variation request and have determined that the
same satisfy the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, and this Board further finds that
it would be in the best interest of the Village to grant the request
for variation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOISr A
FOLLOWS.- I
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the variation
requested with respect to Section 14.1203, of Article XII, Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, to allow an
increase in floor area ratio from .30 to .32.
U, I,
. .... .........
56-V-841 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all
other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and Regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1985.
AYES:
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
Village of �Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: PROPOSED BRISTOL COURT BANQUET FACILITY
828 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE: MARCH 1. 1985
Various staff departments met with representatives of the Bristol
Court Banquet facility, Loras, Inc., owner's of the Thunderbird
Office Complex and a lawyer representing Mr. Martin Weber, owner
of the Thunderbird Bowl on Wednesday, February 27. The purpose
of the meeting was to identify the participation of each owner in
the overall improvement of the parking area including landscaping
and signage.
The petit ioner for the banquet facility, Butterfield Management,
has, agreed to develop that portion of property under contract for
purchase with landscaping and repaving as per the most recent
revLsed site plan. Loral Inc. has also approved of the full-
scale development on their" portion of the property encompassing
thel''r offii
ce complex at the rear of the property. Mr. Irwin
Leiter, attorney representing 11r,, Martin Weber owner of the
Thunderbird Bowl., indicated that his client was willing to make
the improvementson the parking lot involving new surfacing and
restriping. He indicated that his client may not be willing to
participate in improvements on islands in the parking lot
containing trees, but would check the cost out with the Bristol
Court people and is anticipating getting back to our office
before Tuesday with their answer on this aspect of the
improvements.
As far as the freestanding signs are concerned, Bristol Court is
proposing to erect a separate sign for their use not exceeding
five feet in height to be on a raised berm adjacent to Rand Road.
A sign on the South property and adjacent to the driveway would
also be erected no more than 5 feethighon a slightly raised
Terrance L. Burghard - Page 2
March 1, 1985
berm for the Thunderbird Office Complex at the East end of the
property. Butterfield Management Group stated they were not in
favor of joint sign usage between themselves and Thunderbird
Office Complex,
Butterfield 11anagement's position is that each owner of the
individual parcels making up the single lot PUD should be
responsible for the improvements on the parking lot including the
landscaping for their respective ownership areas. As far as the
staff is concerned, the improvements should be done at the same
time and should be a total package including landscaping. We
investigated rough costs for new pavement surfacing and land-
scaped islands for that portion of the property owned by Thunder-
bird Bowl and estimated that the total cost of the improvements
would be in the neighborhood of $42,000 as compared with the
earlier figure suggested by the Bristol Court people for that
same property area of some $55,000-$60,000.
u4smin.-
.. . . ........
11""� ... .. . ........ "'T
..... ... .... . .... . . ...... . .
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ZBA-2-SU-85, LOU DIMAS) ETAL, OAK BROOK BANK TRUS'
8 28 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1985
The petitioner is requesting an amendment to - Special Use/PUD No.
2700 to allow a banquet hall in lieu of the vacant Rand Road
Cinema and to allow another freestanding sign on the property.
'es
The petitioner seeks to convert the existing vacant Cinema to a
banquet and dining center and would make substantial improvement
to the structure including a canopy over the entrance area. The
Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously to recommend approval
of this request but stated that the staff suggestions on sit"e
plan and site design and improvements be addressed before final
approval was given. The original staff recommendation, dated
January 15, 1985, is attached for your reference,
The revised site plan shown by the petitioner at the Zoning Board
Of Ap'peals meeting did address, a number of the staff recommen-
dations. Two issues that have just recently been worked out
InvoIved the canopy, over the entrance and the truck service and
refuse area adjacent to the building. As the Village has a water
main existing in an easement in this area, redesign of these two
areas has been required and a covenant for the property would
also be necessary ensuring that maintenance will still be
possible and that any additional cost associated with the
maintenance due to these structures will be borne by the
petitioner or subsequent owner.
Two issues still remain for this parcel that should be identi-
f led. First, the redesign of the parking area in accordance with
staff recommendations has been identified as a possibility. Final
design plans have not yet been submitted for these improvements.
The parking lot currently is in very poor condition and property
maintenance code violations have been cited for the existing
owners. A redesign of the entire parking lot should be included
as a portion of this application. This is regarded as one single
lot, a PUD, by the Village. Although individual ownership lines
Terrance L. Burghard - Page Two
February 14, 1985
have been drawn for tax purposes the parking lot has significant
cross easements and combined use so that the entire lot should be
upgraded at the same time. The staff has encouraged the owners
of the majority of the property to cooperate in whatever is
needed to make these 'improvements.
The second issue is that a second sign has been requested where
only one is normally permitted. The Board should consider
whether a second sign is reasonable or whether joint use of the
sign would be more appropriate. Neither sign would conform to
the normal setback limits of the Village requirements from side
property lines but could be permitted as part of this PUD. In
any event,, the existing temporary sign and the full structure for
the remainder of the Cinema sign should be removed. sub ect to
these comments, the staff feels that the use itself is
appropriate but that details Of -the development of the parcel
still must be addressed. I
KHF: hg
Attach,
I RcT
w
Village T UNA'u T t Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF PPE. L1 CHAIRMAN
FROM COMHUNI TY DEVELOPMENT STAFF'`
SUBJECT: Z BA- 2 - S U- 8 5 , LOUIS D IMAS , ETAL , OAKBROOK BANK
TRUST
LOCATION: 828 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE JANUARY, 15, 1985
The petitioner is requesting a change in Special Use/ PUD
Ordinance #2700. This ordinance approved the Thunderbird PUD and
specified the use of the Cinema Building. The 'petitioner wishes
to change the Cinema into a banquet facility. Also, a free-
standing sign is requested pursuant to -Sect ion 14.2503.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
Several comments were received .from staff when the case was
reviewed;
1. The proposed use would improve the property as the
Cinema has been vacant and in need of maintenance for some
time.
2. Only one sign is permitted per ,street frontage by the
Code.
3. Any trash/garbage containers should be screened and
placed upon an asphalt or concrete base to avoid rodents and
litter.
4. If any work is to be done on the sewer system, such as
grease traps, an M.S.D. permit will be needed.
5. The parking lot is in a state of disrepair. Improve-
ments should be made as necessary to bring it up to accept-
able levels.
Gil Basniik - Page Two
January 15, 1985
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF COMMENTS
The staff has no oboection to the change
ioni
It J •
I, in 'use prop,os,ed, by the
piet 'it er ,•
is approprIate to the location and zoning,
distrl*ct* There are several problems, however, with the proposed
I
ite plan and sJLgn request.; There is a request for an, addili'ti"onal
sL
freestanding, sign where thiree signs already exist. All three
existing signs are nonconforming. Cinema, Thunderbird •Complex,
and a temporary plywood advertisin•g sign,, •If this new sign is
approved, it should not be constructed until the others have been
removed. The staff recommends that a portion of the proposed
sign be allocated for the identcation of the Thunderbir#
M Filly, we recommend the sign be placed in a
landscaped area and protected by-perilmeter curbing,
The site plan, as presented, should be changed in several ways.
1) No trash enclosure is indicated and should be. 2) The change
in use is an appropriate tie to redesign the parking lot for
better circulation. # Th e only access to the parking spaces on the
South, 0 property line is via the main access drive, not a safe or
efficient maneuver. The North-South parking lanes could be
extended southward., thereby, eliminating the perpendicular
parking on the South property line to solve this problem. 3) The
parking lanes should have islands at the ends to better define
the, traffl".0 pattern', provide for interior landscaping, and allow
for snow stockpiling ing 4) The main entrances and adjacent parking
should, be redesigned to provide for safer. circulation and
landscapiLng near the sign. 5) The parking lot should be brought
up to current standards and resurfacing and, res triiping as 'needed.,
6) The proposed canopy extends southward to infringe onto the
access drive., This should be reduced, to allow for, adequate
circulation, The pavemen,t in this area should be striped to
indicate directions of movement. 7), A landscape plan must be
submitted for approval.
In summary, while the use change is reasonable and adequate
parking exists, the site plan needs to be modified and existing
signs should be removed. The staff recommends approval subject
to the above comments.
KHF: hg
..... . ...... . ... ...... ..
5f2 0",
11 E 1, E"(1 JU, I'A"', .,DL: d, 1111 �1—� 4E
'EM"F',`"" 17 1 EITT�Tl , '711,11,
u
q C"
u w "�V 1 -«� .
Z A Case No. 2 -SU -85
Hearing a,"- e i a n u ar7y 2 4�
Petitioner:
ic u s ",,i et a.
Oaf. B ook Bank & Trus
Subject Property: 824 E. Rand Road
Publication Date: January 8, 1985
Request: Amendment to a Special Use in the nature
of a Planned Linn Development (Ordinan Ve
No. 2 7 0 0) to allow a free standing S
subject property, and to permit a
banquet hall instead of the cinema use.
ZBA Members Present: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
John green
Marilyn O'May
Zen Petrucelli
ZBA. Member Abser. - : Lois Brothers
Objectors: None
Robert Novelle, ' a.ttorney for the petitioner, presented his case
stating that the petitioner would like to remodel the existing
building, a cinema vacant for approximately 2 gears, into a
banquet hall. The building is located within a Planned Unit
Development, known as the Thunderbird Subdivision. Other uses
on the property include a bowling alley and office buildings - one
of which houses the Doctors Emergency Center.
It was noted that this being one lot of record, the Village Code
only permits one sign on the frontage, which is Rand. Road. The
petitioner is requesting a sign on each side of the curb --cut
entrance/exit. It was explained that with the number of buildings
on this PUD it would be necessary to draw attention of their
location with two low signs as stated. The signs proposed would
be in accordance with the Village standards for signs. The
petitioner also stated that all requirements of the Village would
be met as to landscaping and. parking. Being one large lot, there
is sufficient parking for the existing and proposed uses on the
parol.
The proposed banquet facility would be able to accommodate 900
guests. The petitioner would improve the parking lot assigned
to the former cinema and that a defined traffic flow pattern would
be created with landscaping and curbing. This is not presently
an existing condition on the parcel.
The comments of staff were noted, a copy of which is attached to
MIM
Off,
f#
ZBBA: 2, SU I 5
P`ca,qd,, 2 0 f `22
pv
the's',,ea mt
Mr. Petrj;��el�,-IJL, s: :c
e 5,,�ad
by Mmr.,,q`751&ved �to Ora'r",tt er
:. �I";��"
no
the rees,tetr azeir�dmne,,,nt, to '�Qtdiii�,La: No'. '27,&0 a
)I" 'U"
S: p ia ri the hatUf
"e"C' il �al US" I
'of ,,P-lan'ned th,3` t evelolp to,
itban''q,"uetl f"acl'AL�l
permvi It of : to
''Y
thff e, recruest, f pr- a frre/e,, 'edl th:' t the peti'Lt'imiler''
PP,��,Operate,v th the- staf f
an cape :ltrli!i:ffilc 7p, s i
1"" &s,,�, and, atb��`Jm, de'''I",gn,
, vcbi ro,,111,211,' call, Ayle�t
-7
rer, 't ag er d"jq cl,
reen,U0,11-mayll,
M, tl'ilomi ca,x-faeid.
5 � recqmmlendata,cm, vil
b d
a,e
,fo— d d , �t h- , Vi - B " td' fot
gb5a,
t aty- 19,� 1, heiir On..,, Ld8r,at4on t 'theFeb,,rt
rol,'A. Vii,elds
Rxecoxdj�iRg' iS-,'O�0,,ret,8LrY'
1�
Village Of MountProspect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
is
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
KENNETH H. FRI TZ , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ZBA-6-Z--85, ZBA-7-V-85 PRECISION AUTOMOTIVE SALES
620 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
DATE: FEBRUARY 14 , 1985
�w 6 ,�, � ff • � „.„ � - • 111 i ' '' • . u ''
•oil• •
a
KHF: hg
Village of M"ount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois �,� „� ti.
F71-
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GIL BA.SNIR, ZONING BOARD OF APEAiRMAN
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZBA-6- Z-85 , ZBA--7-V-85 , PRECISION AUTOMOTIVE SALES
AND SERVICE, INC.
LOCATION: 620 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
DATE: JANUARY 1 5 , 19 8 5—
R.EA�UE S T
The petitioner is requesting a rezoning from B-3 to the B-4
Business District. This zoning is needed to use the existi-ng,
nonconforming vacant gas station for automotive service. Retail
sales of auto parts is also anticipated. variations are re-
quested seeking to eliminate the truce, loading space required by
Section 14.2105.B.1 and to allow an access drive, and accessory
items for the adjacent property in the required rear yard
(Section 14.2102.C). The property to the East has a garage door
directed for access from this property.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
In reviewing, the petition the staff had several comments or
concerns regarding this request:
1. The Code Enforcement Division said that the proposed
plan would improve this site but also observed the intended
use was more intense than a service station.
2. The drive onto William, shown as 48 feet in widthis
excessive. ,
3. A 27 inch combined sewer is located along, Northwest
Highway .and a 12 inch combined sewer on William. Our
records indicate six service stubs off the larger sewer. The
Development Plan for the property should indicate which
service is to be used. The remaining service stubs shall be
plugged.
12-1 U Z.21LZ a IL :iz JIL JUZkMLxY_,Z_
mr 11 w. 3 21`11111 "I", "I'll Ex
Gil Basnik - Page Two
January 15, 1985
4. There are six services indicated off the 8 inch water
main in Northwest Highway. The five not used must be
plugged at the main.,
5. The grading plan to be submitted should indicate if any
storm inlets or catch basins are required. The plan must
show on-site grading as well as existing grades within 100
feet of the property, 1
6. Parkway trees and street lights are required by the
code, The sidewalk along Northwest Highway needs to be
replaced, therefore., the width should be reduced 3 feet
allowing a larger parkway, to better accommodate the trees.
7. I.D.O.T. permits will 'ltalso'be needed for the work needed
along Northwest Highway. A letter of credit and fees for
all work must be posted per the Development Code.
This request before the Board is similar to but more intensive
than that in also on Northwest Highway. It proposes
an expansion of a nonconforming automotive use. The Board must
consider whether a more intensive use of auto repair is to be
encouraged on Northwest Highway. B-4 .zoning would permit -full
automotive services. including, engine overhaul,, body shop,'paint,
etc. Is this zoning and use apprbpriate' or are other retail uses
and/or office use more appropriate?
Regarding the site plan the staff suggests three changes. First
the driveway should be reduced to the standard 24-25 width;
increasing the distance from Northwest Highway, Second., anew
sidewalk and parkway trees along Northwest Highway mentioned
above should be *included. Third, the landscape strip along
Northwest Highway should be increased. Adequate room, exists on
site in order to increase this strip..' The 5 foot landscape strip
shown does not leave adequate room for plant material when the
automobile overhang is taken into account.
KHF: hg
"M
1P
J1, All
is, =0 I UT" .... .... ..
- - ----------------- . ..... . ....... .... ........ . . . ......... . .......... . . ..... ........................ . ................ . ........
"zi
THE REGULAR MEETING OF
MINUTtS
MOUNT PROSPECT 'ZONING BOARD OF A74D.PEALS1
ZBA Case No. 6-Z-85 & 1-V-85 Hearing Date: january 24' 1 ---
Petitioner: Precision Automotive Sales & Service
Subject Property-, 620 East Northwest Highway
Publication Date: January 8, 1985
I.N
Request.- Zonin hange from B-3 to B-4 and variation,
from Section 14.2102.0 to allow for an
encroachment in the rear yard.
ZBA Members Present: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
John Green
Marilyn O'May
Len'Petrucelli
ZBA Member Absent: Lois Brothers
Objectors: None
Mr. Michael Bercos, attorney -for the petitioner, nery presented his
case stating that the subject property is an abandoned service
station, having been vacant for approximately 6,years.
The request for B-4 zoning, from the B-3, would permit this site
to become -an automotive service operation in addition to parts
sales. The petitioner,Bill Aldrin +, -20.0 S. William Street,
Mount Prospect, plans to,established a specialty service operation
devoted to Fiat automobiles. It was stated that there would be no
body, fender or paint work performed.
Fiat auto -makers had ceased providing service to their automobiles
in 1982 and that such a,need exists in the opinion of the petitioner.
Eleven parking spaces would be -provided plus an additional 3 spaces
for employees, which number are in accordance with Village
requirements.
Mr. Tom Grafton, 307 S. William, and Herb Horn, 310 S. Louis
both spoke in favor of the proposal.The petitioner has agreed to
screen the rear of the building/parking area from the single family
home to the north owned by Mr.Grafton. There is also an alley
between the rear of the property and Mr. Grafton's home. Thee.
petitioner stated that he'lis also agreeable to providing the
necessary easement to the business to the east, which business
presently using,the small area for truck loading space. This area
necessitates the variation for encroachment.
Members of the Zoning Board expressed concern about the future use
I�u12I11�r12 I==
o»uiA IIA .iw.0 _ WI�In 'AwnMRm H u o.,wwwl,m oo w,.,,ll�wwx,Ws 160. NM1"d4PP ,. dili...,„ .w,eN, I �UrdI1 gWWwGd lw•••-wa�Xi011l�=dNXNYrwn Iiv�X' ( iDnDID iuwurlr'lJtki5 �4l1JwAiIr � Vwl C
J
�
1 � u amwrvmry ryx W : J �
SBA-Z-85
yy� 8 5 an] J[t
Page 2 o -F
of the property if B-4 zoning was granted and this particular '
business was not successful.
The staff comments were also noted as to whether this is an
appropriate use for this Property. A complete copy of the
staff comments are attached to these minutes.
The entrance to the proposed facility yould be off William Street.
The curb -cuts that did . exist at the facility along .Northwest
Highway were removed when the State improved the roadway some
2 years ago. The petitioner did. agree to all the points brought up
by staff, such as landscaping and ,screening.
Mrs. + ' May, seconded by Mr. Petruce l l i ;. movedto grant the
requested re -zoning from B-3 to B-4 being the subject of
ZBA --Z--5.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Brettrag :r, Cassidy, Green, O'May,
Petruclli, Basni
Nays.- None
Motion carried.
Mrs. O'May, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant the
requested variations in, 2BA 7-V-85 to permit the encroachment
into the rear yard.
Upon roll call,-. Ayes -0 Bret.tracger, Cassia ,.Green, O'1" ay,
Petru.ce'lli,, Basnik
Nags; None
Motion carried.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Beard , of Trustees
for their consideration at the February 19, 1985 Village Board
meeting.
Carol h:. Fields
RecordingSecreta
9
J / „I
u i,% J i
1C f
� �F I .r� �� � I L.: �f�� l� ��� .� ll:.l.� ��C � ,�,� , �� �, � 11.1.x. ����Ill[,_ . � ,.. �.,w�
2393V
a 9 1
. . .........
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WITH
RESPECT TO ZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE
B-4 BUSINESS, RETAIL AND SERVICE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Precision Automotive Sales & Service, Inc. of 200 South
William Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois has Petitioned to rezone
certain Property hereinafter described from the B-3 Business, Retail
and Service District to the B-4 Business, Retail and Service District
for the purpose of permitting the establishment and operation of an
automobile sales, service and minimal garage operation (excluding
body, fender and painting operations); said property being legally
described as follows:
Lots 53 through 58, both inclusive (except 31 1 1/2"
taken evenly off the Easterly side of said Lot 58). in
Morningside Gardens, being a Subdivision of part of
the Northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
in Cook County, Illinois..
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said rezoning application
(designated as Case No. ZBA-6-Z-85) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of January,
1985, pursuant to proper publication of due notice in the Mount
Prospect Herald on the 8th day of January, 1985; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has forwarded its finding
and recommendation to the Board of Trustees of the Village that the
requested rezoning be approved, subject to implementation by the
Petitioner, of landscaping and other improvements as approved by the
Community Development Department, and the President and Board of
Trustees have considered further the finding and recommendation of
the Zoning Board of Appeals and Petitioner's request, and have
determined that the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect
would be obtained by the adoption of the necessary ordinance to
accomplish said rezoning.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 14 entitled "Zoning"
of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as amended) is
hereby further amended to rezone and reclassify from the B-3
Business, Retail and Service District to the B-4. Business, Retail
and Service District, the following described property:
Lots 53 through 58, both inclusive, (except 3' 1 1/2"
taken evenly off the Easterly side of said Lot 58) , in
Morningside Gardens, being a Subdivision of part of
the Northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
in Cook County, Illinois.
SECTION THREE: Said rezoning of the Subject Property shall be
conditioned upon accomplishment of the landscaping and other
improvements as approved by the Community Development Department,
and on the operation and maintenance of the Subject Property for
automotive sales, services and minor garage operations (excluding
body, fender and painting operations) .
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effec-11
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law. I
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of I r 1985.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
V"'llage of 'Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT,- ZBA-8-V-85, OPUS INC.
LOT 501, KENSINGTON CENTER FOR BUSINESS
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF AND FEEHANVILLE
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1985
The • petitioner has requested a Variation from the Zoning
Ordinance to allow for a 55 foot high, four story office building
instead of the three story, 30 foot high limit in the I-1
District. The application was heard at a special meeting of the
Zonng Board of AppeaLs on February 7, 1985. At that time, 'the
ZonIng, Board, of Appeals voted 'to deny the application by a vote
of 2 affirmatiLve and 5 n,e,
gati1ve, The Zoning Board, of Appeals did
not feel that the petitif-oner had developed adequate hardship to
support his request for a variation and they were also concerned
about the potential precedent where., if granted this request, the
Board would not be able to deny other situations with s i m lar
circumstances. Several members of the Board indicated that they
would be more comfortable, if the Village Board were inclined to
grant this request, to more appropriately amend the text of the
I-1 District as then hardship would not be involved,
The Village staff had reviewed this request and supported the
application. Although this building is higher than would
nor ally be permitted by almost 50%, the setbacks provided from
adjacent property lines and rights-of-way were well in, excess of
the m in im,um s The office building would be 120 feet from.
Feehanville Drive, 250 feet from the right-of-way of Wolf and
350 feet from their South property line adjacent to the Winona
School of Photography. The staff had originally suggested
against a Text Amendment as that could then be applied to any
Industrial District unilaterally throughout the Village which
would not necessarily be appropriate. In this particular
circumstance the height is not a problem.
KHF: hg
TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEMBERS
FROM: STEPHEN 11. PARK, VILLAGE PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-V-85, OPUS, INC.
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1985
It has been brought to my attention that the staff report
delivered to the Zoning Board of Appeals did not address several
important issues that are relevant to the request of opus, Inc.
This omission related to the Annexation Agreement provisions for
Opus% 'TInc. in granting them specified variations from either the
Zoning Ordinance or the Development Code, and in some cases
increasing the requirements from those Codes. I have itemized
below a list of several of the pertinent facts regarding this
Annexation Agreement and where they have potential impact upon
this request.
1. Opus, Inc. is still subject to the Zoning Ordinance,
Building Codes,Development Code and other relevant Village
ordinances relating to the development of the entire
Kensington Center for Business except wherever specifically
changed in the Annexation Agreement. This includes the need
to have staff approval of the site plan, landscape plan,
utility plan, and zoning compliance at the time of issuance
of building permits. This review per the Development Code
and Annexation Agreement is to be completed by the Village
staff.
2. Lot sizes are permissible to be below 4 acres in area.
There is a formula for how many lots can be below 4 acres
and what that average lot size must be. This particular lot
is in excess of 4 acres.
3. The parking regulations of the Zoning Ordinance were
varied to allow opus to have a different parking calculation
method. They are as follows:
a. One space for each 250 square feet of office
b. One space for each 1500 square feet of warehouse
. . . .......
Zoning Board of Appeals Members - Page 2
February 7. 1985
C. One space for .each 1000 square feet of assembly (or
an alternate employee calculation)
4. Loading spaces are required for offices at the ratio of
one space for each 100,000 square feet of floor area
5. Sidewalks are required on only one side of the street
throughout the entire complex. Engineering plans indicate
that the sidewalk in this area is to be installed on the
North side of Feehanville Drive.
6. Setbacks vary considerably depending upon whether the
parcel is on the interior of the complex or on the perimeter
and whether the property is adjacent to residential use or
zoning. Several of the setbacks are as follows:
a. Fifty feet from residential zoned property for
buildings
40'
b. Forty feet from residential property for parking
C. Forty foot required front yard with no parking
(unless it is a curvilinear street)
d. Thirty foot side yard for a building
e. Ten foot side yard for parking
f. Twenty foot rear yard for a building
g. Ten foot rear yard for parking
Opus, Inc. has only asked for a variation in the permitted height
of the building which is the standard in our Zoning ordinance.
Proposed setbacks are well within the limits. As they have
requested no other variations, before any permits would be
issued) the site plans and accompanying documentation would be
reviewed, for complete compliance with the Code. No permits would
be issued unless all other aspects were in accordance with the
Village codes. I hope this 'has eliminated some of the potential
confusion on, the part of the Board regarding the requirements for
this development.
SMP:hg
I'M
. ..... .. ... ... H
WU
13
M11
V
. . .... ..
WE u T"if" I'm kT I VI I
-L "A
TO: GIL BASNIK) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-V-85, OPUS., INC.
LOCATION: LOT 501 - KENSINGTON CENTER FOR BUSINESS
SOUTHWEST CORNER 'O,.F WOLF ROAD AND FEEHANVILLE DR.
DATE: JANUARY 29, 1985
The petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.2204 of
the Zoning Ordinance. This is Provision stipulates that the maximum,
height of' a building shall not exceed three stories or 30 feet.
'The Opus Cor"poration, is requestion permission to construct a 4
stOr' office building y g which would be 55 feet in height.
VILLAGE STAFF
COIDIENTS
Staff departments have reviewed, the application and comments
Iiave beet i 'received., The Engiineer ing, and Public 'Works Departme,nt
have cautioned that Permits would not be Issued unless verifil-
cation, has been made that the s,a,nl*ta,ry sewe'r h.a,s suffcient
ca acct 'to handle any extra flow caused by the. increased size of
�y
buildi'ng.
'The staff also expressed concern, that ad"
jacent properties be
notified. The opus Corporation has met the legal, requirements for
A
no t i f ica t 1. on but the of thmagnitude of this development
the "pillage as extended a courtesy, notice toproperties adjacent
to the entire development as it approaches Wolf'' Road.,
„, ... ,., ,.. :,, ,,. „., ..., ,,,,,, r t ircrurrn„ rsru••;,.w., .,, ..uuu:,r„
d y
U, 'j
.!1�..,.
Gil Basnik - Page Two
January 29, 1985
C0121UNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF COM IETTS
Staff recognizes that a number of potential tenants in the
Kensington Center for Business have indicated the desire for an
office building. This would allow the opportunity for a mixture
of tenants while maintaining the efficiency of the land. The
location of the building on the site minimizes the impact on
surrounding properties by placing the building, diagonally on the
parcel. Furthermore, the building is located well above the
minimum setback required under the ordinances. The setback is
scaled to 120 feet from the right-of-way of Feehanville Drive,
200 feet from the right -of --way of wolf Road, and 300 feet from
the South property line. These setbacks, together with the
intensive landscaping required and provided should address
concerns for the potential ,impact of this size and height of
conte _
building. in the s taff ”' s opinion, there should be no significant
i
increage n traffic flow because of this proposed variation.
Subject to the resolution of Engineering's sewer capacity issue,
the staff recommends approval of the request.
BHT : hg
„u.
p
.; wvi ,..., HIRE, v„�.... ,„ i ,.: ,, ,.,, „ r. %,f,i v. /f wr'nr
ori �::. ;.. , / ,/: i i i 'fl r!/ ,' 9 (� rnw ,
T e, "I'M ,T ill �,.�� � - „ , ,�. �7113.11W...... , � N f , � f�. m .,. ,w+� ,vli�f ...
................. ..... ...........
MINUTE, THE SP'Z'""CIAL MwE'ETLIE,-,)G 01F
1
CUNT° PR�w�tlP CT ZGN G B A C�' � P
Z BDate: L4
Petitioner:'IV" gopus Corporao
Subject Property: Southwest Corner of Wolf R.oaa a.n
Feeha.nville Dri,%re
Publication Date.: January 18, 1985
Request: Variat°ion frbm" ' Section l . 2 2 0 4 t o To e,
a building height of 55 fe t instead
c_ -
the permitted. 30 fee -'k--,
ZBA, Members Present: -Gilbert Basni, Chairman
Robert Brettra.ger
Ronald Cassidy
Lois Brothers
John Green.
Marilyn
o ' M.a7
:den Petrucell i .
Interested Party: Mr. & Mrs. Forowycz
1504 Lowden
Neil Rauenhorst, representing opus Corporation, presented his
case.
The Proposed 4 story ,building,would
be located at the easy boundar��
of the entire development, approximately 1,000 feet from the closes
a.
single family home. Th -e lot is 6.9 acres in size, and located
on the south , side of the new entrance from Wolf Road.
The petitioner explained'
.hat opus Corporation has been approached
by many potential clients to occupy office space in this type of
building and that the market is such that this type of office
building is inemand.
Mr. Forowycz requested information as to what was going to be built
behind his home, which is the south side of the development
Mr. Rauenhorst stated that warehouse/office buildings are planned
to be constructed in a future phase:. Questions were also answered
as to drainage and maintaining the development as it applied to
Mr. Forowyc z ' s rear yard. .
The petitioner stated that they would like to offer a broader ranee
of buildings to clients and this type of use was called for in the
market, stating many such buildings have been constructed ,anad
occupied in surrounding communities.
Members of the ZoningBeard. expressed pressed. their concerns that no
hardship exists under the standards for a variation, noting that
JUM I'D LX_ZU"'." A2 Ju
ZBA 8 -V -85 -
Page 2 of 2
l
a recent amendment to the Zoning Ordinance created an O -P.
(Office Research) District. The petitioner stated that at the
direction of the staff the request be submitted for a variation
rather reauesting a text amendment for this one parceL.
Mr. Green requested that the petitioner be required -to install
and maintain adequate lighting in the 'parking lot, if this request
was granted, since the uses in the building would be such that
could create a hazard. The petitioner stated that parking
lot lights would be installed.
Considerable discussion took place on the fact that the only
hardship, as seen by the members of the Board, was that the
petitioner could sell or rent this type of space for more than
Space in a Style of building that was within the 30 feet height.
Mr. Basnik stated that if this type of variation is to be
considered, the Village Board should direct an -amendment be made
to the I-1 Zoning District, allowing 55 ft. high buildings. It was
the opinion of the ma3ority" of the Board that since the petitioner
was Opus Corporation and, if the Zoning Board denied this request
the Village Board would approve it and Tif that be the case, then
the height restriction should be amended to apply to the entire
Village.
Mr.-Brettrager stated that while no particular hardship is
demonstrated, the proposal would be a benefit to the Village.
Steve Park, Village Planner, stated the po'sition of staff, as
reflected in the staff report attached to these minutes. Mr. Park
-h "were lo'cated wiLthu"Ln., the
Ih g
Pw
t*o Of,:
'n
f eet, Of, the� t
which would re u*
ir
re: ,,n
q_ t h
reques,t, A.� �cplxttesy, mot,k p 6Wners
I ce wad al 'Y
s1le " nt outtt, to I ,roper,"
as e ",OPPIS '�.id eve�,1,6P!n`,
botddt, n the_,& "' �t r.1 he
,9 Y half' of'
nt
Mr. Petrucelli, seconded by Mr. Cassidy, moved to grant theru
"I
requested variation in ZBA 8-V-85 to allow the construction of
a 55 foot high (4 story) office building in an I-1 District,
Upon roll call: Ayes: Brothersf Brettrager
Nays: Cassidy, Green, O'May, Petrucelli, Basnik
Motion failed.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for
consideration at their February 19, 1985 meeting.
Carol A. Fields
Recording Secretary
.... . . . .
fa
j
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 1, 1985
SUBJECT: PARATRANSIT GRANT PROGRAM BETWEEN THE SUBURBAN BUS
DIVISION OF THE RTA AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
(MOUNT PROSPECT SENIOR TAXI PROGRAM)
Per you request, I have reviewed the Grant Agreement between the
above captioned parties. This Agreement covers the period
March 1, 1985 through February 28, 1986 and calls for a maximum
funding level of $18,563. My review of the Agreement found no
material changes from the most recently expired Agreement other
than the following:
Page 14 - Section 10 C. Requires the Village to,
among other things, utilize drivers who are
properly qualified and lawfully licensed for the
service provided in the vehicle used,...have
received appropriate safety training ... and shall
display proper courtesy toward passengers....
Exhibit A lists the following changes in fares:
Intra -Village travel - $2.50 per trip
(Up from $2.10 per trip.) Passengers to
pay $1.00 (up from $.75). Village to
subsidize remaining $1.50 (up from $1.35
of the f ixed rates
Exceptions to the rates noted above for
travel to local hospital facilities are
as follows:
Holy Family Hospital -Passenger is
responsible for $1.65 of the $3.00
fare and Northwest Community Hospital -
Passenger responsible for $2.15 of the
$3.50 fare.
Exhibit A also requires that service will be
coordinated with adjacent SBD and RTA funded
vehicle leased services within the area wherever
feasible....
Appendix A also calls -for the SBD to reimburse the
Village for the acceptance of all monthly tickets
used on the Paratransit System and properly
recorded by passenger type and date 'of use in the
monthly operating report,
Appendix A further shifts or further places
responsibility for the following on the Village: '
A. Daily oversight of the service.
B. Selection and training of personnel,
daily maintenance of required records.
From.*my review of the Agreement, it does not appear that. these
added requirements will add a detrimental impact on the Village
or the service as provided,
0
. .. ... ........ . . . . . ..
"fit
'n "s
r.I 111 IF
I F
PARATRANSIT GRANT PROGRAM
GRANT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE
SUBURBAN bUb DIVIS10N OF THE
RTA
AND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARATRANS IT GRANT PROGRAM
GRANT AGREEMENT
PART 1
The Paratransit Grant Program Grant
'A,,reement Consists o This Part I and -Part II Entitled
General `terms and Conditions
DATE OF AGREEMENT,: March 1,, 1985
TRANSPORTATION AGENCY: Village 'of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
PROJECT: As Described in Exhibit A
MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF' GRANT:
GRANT PERIOD: March 1. 1985 — February 28, 1986
FUNDED CAPITAL EXPENSES: None
SBD MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE SHARE OF OPERATING DEFICIT: 75%
MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF FUNDED OPERATING EXPENSES: $18,563
SPECIAL CONDITIONS.:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Suburban Bus Division "SBD"
of the RTA and the Transportation Agency have caused the
Agreement, consistiny of Parts I amd II, to be executed by
their respective duly authorized ofticers and made effective as
of the d ate t i rst set forth above.
SUBURBAN BUS DIVISION OF THE
RTA TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
(N ame)
By:
Its: Its:
ATTL;6'f ATTEST
... ......................... .
f1 G fl
2
PART II
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The following terms conditions, covenants,, and agreements
constitute part of the terms, conditions, covenants, and agree-
ments of the Paratransit Grant Program Grant Agreement, (the
"Agreement") between the Suburban Bus Division of the Regional
Transportation Authority ("SBD") and the 'transportation agency
named in Part I of this Agreement (the "Transportation Agency")
providing for financial assistance under the Suburban Bus Div i-
,_ ) ion of the Regional Transportation Authority Act.
W I T N E S S E T H:
W H E' 1� ,ASS the 01 S13 D#1 was established under the
Regional Trarv:-:,porta t ion Authority Act (111. Rev. Stat. ch. III
2/3 Sections 701.01 et seq.) (Her'ein the "Act") for the purpose
of a id i ng and assisting public transportation in the
Metropolitan Region:
WHEREAS, Section 2.01(a) of the Act provides that
the ""SBD"" may make grants to transportation agencies in f ur-
therance of such purposes;
WHEREAS, Section 2.02 of the Act provides that the
I'SBD" may make grants to transportation agencies for operating
and other expenses upon such terms and conditions as the "SBD"
shall prescribe or as the "SBD" and the transportation Agency
shall agree in any grant contract;
WHEREAS, Secti-on 2.49 of the Act provides that the
"S13D" shall encourage experimentation in developing new public
transportation technology, that the "SBD" shall conduct, in
cooperation with other public and private agencies, studies and
demonstration and development projects to test and develop
rne t- hods for improving' -public transportation for reducing its
Costs to user.,i or for increasing public use, and that the "SBD"
shall conduc-l-, sponsor, and participate in other studies and
experiments useful to achieving the pur I pose of the Act.
WHEREAS,, the "SBD" has approved and adopted a Para -
transit Grant Program, (the "Program"). &. -
WHEREAS, The Transportation Agency has appl ied (the
-"Application") to the '"SBD"" for a grant under the Program in
respect to the project described in Exhibit A to this Agreement
(herein the "Project).
-7
. . . .. . . . ............
UF3E31MffF__,_
F?
i , i I � 1111111,111111 1 " "11,111", ... . ..... 3, 11/1
J1 �� M T U1T,',,FT I I
- 3
"'4014 THEREFORE, in consideration of tf)� premist-,,; and
k
f o r other good and valuahle considerations the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows.
1. Definitions.
(a) Funded Ca .tat Expenses. The t0_ rTn "Funded
Capital Expensesils'h'all mean the capital ex-
penditures and other costs which the "SM)" has
agreed to fund, as are set frDrLI) in Exhibit B
to this Agreement. No twi ths te-i nd i nr any L h i ng
in this Agreement or Exhibit R t the con-
trary, the term "Funded Capital Expenses"
shall not include- any e-, x p e n s es which are
not: M in conformance with the description
of the Project and all other, provisions of
this Agreement, (ii) necessary in order to
accomplish the Project, (iii) reasonable in
amount for the goods provided, (iv) actual net
costs to the Transportation Agency after all
applicable credits are deducted (i.e. the
price paid minus any refunds, rebates, or in-
terest income) (v) in conformance with stand-
ards of allowability from time to time estab-
lished by the "SBD" and (vi satisfactorily
documented.
(b) Fundina Quarter. The terin ""Funding u a r t,-:� r
shall mean otich (4uarter. beginning each July 1,
October 1, January 1, and Apr. iL 1, during the
Grant Period.
C Net Project Cost. The t(-.?rin "Net Project Cost"
shall mean the Operating Deficit plus Funded
Capital Expenses.
(d) 2perating Deficit. The term "Operating
Deficit"" as used in this Agreement shall mean
the amount by which the Operating Expenses in-
curred by the Transportation Agency in per-
forming and operating the Project during the
Grant Period exceed the Operating Income in
respect to the Project during the Grant
Period.
2per,atinq Ex,(-_5,nses. The term "OperaLin(j Ex -
pe nses as kised in this Ayr(.-i}rnent ri ha I l rn e a n
all expenses properly classified as operating
expenses according to generally accepted
accounting principles incurred by the Trans-
portation Agency in performing and operating
the Project, but shall in no event include (i)
.depreciation whether funded or unfunded unless
4
f Operating Income, The term "Operating Income"
as used in this Agreement shall mean revenue
from all sources Properly classified as
operating income including all fare revenues,
federal and state subsidies, interest or in-
vestment monies and assets in respect to the
paratransit project and all income of any kind
attributable to the paratransit project. No t -
withstanding the foregoing the term operating
income -s-hall not include any funds mutually
agrc-,,,ed upon to be designated as local share in
the Monthly Operating Report, including
federal, state or local government operating
SubsidieNs or grants in respect to the
project=.
ah! s
21,11
gn
TE"I I � MIM Eff"'EMEEM,
- 5
..........
2. Amount of Grant.
Subject to the terms, and conditions of this Agreement, and
in accordance witil the guidelines of the Paratcans-it Grant
Programr the "SBD" hese-by agrees to pay the Transportation
Agency an amount (herein the "Grant") up to the Ne t Pro-
ject Cost (as set forth in Exhibit A of the Agreement) of
the Transportation Agency during the Grant Period; pro-
vided, however, that in no event shall the total' amount of
the grant exceed the l4sser of (i) the Funded Capital Ex-
penses Plus the "SBD's" Maximum Percentage Share multi-
plied by the Operating Deficit (the "Maximum Amount of
Funded Operating Expenses") as calculated monthly as set
forth in Part I and Exhibit A of the Agreement, or ( ii)
the Funded Capital Expenses plus the amount obtained by
multiplying the total number of one-way passenger trips,
as calculated monthly, by the maximum subsidy amount per
trip shown in Exhibit C.
3.e ort in ecu i temente .
(a) Upon execution and d6livery of the Agreement by the
"SBD" and the Transportation Agency, the Transporta-
tion Agency shall furnish the "SBD" with a budget
projection, in form and substance satisfactory to
the "SBD"F the twelve month period through
February 28 _.__f 1986, inclusive, setting
forth the projected operating deficit of the Trans-
portation Agency in form and substance satisfactory
to the "SBD".
(b) Following the execution and delivery of the Agree-
ment, the Transportation Agency shall furnish the
"SBD" (i) as soon as available and in any event
within thirty (30) days after the end of each month
of the Grant Period, a statement setting forth the
Operating Deficit of the Transportation Agency in
respect of the Project for such month and for the
period from the beginning of the Grant Period to the
end of month, inclusive, all in reasonable detail in
a form approved by the "SBD",, and duly certified by
the Transportation Agency's chief financial officer
as having been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and practices consis-
tently applied, (ii) within sixty (60) days after
the end of each fiscal year of the Transportation
Agency covering any part of the Grant Period, and
upon request of the "SBD", a statement of the
Operating Deficit of the Transportation Agency in
respect of the Project for that part of the Grant
Period included in each such fiscal year, audited by
independent certified public accountants satisfac-
tory to the "SBD111 (iii) from time to time such
further statements, reports and other information
regarding the Project as the "SBD" may reasonably
request.
4. Pazment of Grant.
The Grant payments in respect of the Funded Capital
Expense shall be paid in the manner set forth in
Exhibit B hereto. The Grant 'payments in respect of
the Operating Deficit shall, subject to the limita-
tions on amount set forth in paragraph 2 of this
Agreement, be paid in installments, monthly, in an
amount up to the " SBD' s" Maximum Percentage Share
multiplied by the estimated Operating Deficit of the
Transportation Agency in respect of the Project for
each such month as set forth in the statement
furnished to the "SBD" pursuant to clause ( ii) of
subparagraph 3(b) hereof, plus (or minus) such
amount as the "SBD" has underpaid (or overpaid) t ' he
"SBDIs" Maximum Percentage Share of the Transporta-
tion Agency's Operating Deficit in respect of the
Project for any previous month as determined from
the financial statements of the Transportation
Agency furnished to the "SBD" pursuant to clause (i)
of subparagraph 3(b) hereof. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in the event the "SBD" objects to any
statement of the estimated Operating Deficit of the
Transportation Agency furnished to the ""SBD" pur-
suant to subparagraph 3(a) hereof , or to any f inan-
cial statements of the Transportation Agency
furnished the "SBD" pursuant to subparagraph 3(b)
hereof, , or to any failure by the Transportation
Agency to perform any of its obligations under this
Agreement, it may withhold payment of any part or
parts of the Grant until the objection is resolved
to the satisfaction of the "SBD".
(b) Notwi thstanding subparagraph (a) above,, the ""SBD"
may pay the Grant in such other manner as the Board
of Directors of the "SBD" shall, in its sole discre-
tion, determine.
(c) Notwithstanding anything in subparagraphs, 4 (a) or
4(b) to the contrary, the aggregate amount of pay-
ments made by the "SBD" to the Transportation Agency
under subparagraphs 4(a) and 4(b) shall in no event
exceed the Maximum Amount of the Grant. At such
time as the "SBD" has paid the Maximum Amount of the
Grant to the Transportation Agency, the "SBD" shall
["T
U
....;C ..... .. ... I r
f
M
7
have no obligation to make any further payments un-
der the Agreement.' Any payments made by way of set
off against amounts due to the "SBD" from the Trans-
portation Agency or by way of an adjus'Linent against
any overpayment by the "SBD" and any payments made
by the "SBD" to the Transportation Agency in respect
of any expenses, deficits, or funding requirements
incurred by the Transportation Agency in respect of
the Project during any part or parts of the Grant
Period under any agreement, arrangement, or under-
standing which has been superseded by the Agreement,
shall be counted against the Maximum Amount of the
Grant,
(d) Notwi thstanding anything in subparagraphs 4 (a) and
4 (b) to the contrary, it is expressly agreed that
the obligation of the "SBD" to pay the Grant shall
be limited to the availability of funds from the ""S -
BD's" revenues and budget for its fiscal year end-
ing December 31,. 1985 and so that i n the
event the "SBD" determines that funds are not avail-
able from the "SBD's" revenues and budget For its
fiscal year ending December 31, 1985 and to pay
any remaining unpaid part or parts of the G,rant, the
"SBD's" obligations to pay such unpaid part or parts
of the Grant shall be terminated forthwith and the
"SBD" shall have no further obligations to make any
payments to the Transportation Agency under the Agr-
eement in respect of its public funding require-
ment -s. It is understood that as of the date of the
Agreement there is no assurance that funds will be
available to pay the full amount of the Grant. it
is expressly agreed that the "SBD" shall be under no
obligation of any kind whatsoever to seek to in-
crease or augment its revenues or budget for its Ei-
scal year ending December 31,, 1985 whether
through its taxing or revenue bond powers or through
any powers or means. In determining the avail-
ability of funds for payment of the Grant, the man-
ner in which the "SBD" expends and allocates its
funds and revenues shall be within the sole discre-
tion of the "SBD". At Such time as the Grant pay-
ments cease for lack of available funds as deter-
mined by the "SBD", the Transportation Agency shall
be relieved of its obligations under paragraph 7 of
the Agreement. The termination of the "SBD's" obli-
gation to pay any remaining unpaid part of parts of
the Grant shall not be in any manner qualified or
affected by the fact that the Transportation Agency
may have already partially or fully performed its
obligations tinder the Agreement in respect of the
unpaid part or parts of the Grant by the time it is
determined by the "SBD" that it will be unable to
pay the remaining unpaid part or parts of the Grant-
'e,
(e) The statements of the Transportation Agency's public
funding requirements as set forth in the budget pro-
jections and financial statements furnished to the
"SBD" pursuant to subparagraphs 3(a) and 3(b) shall
not be binding upon the "SBD". The "SBD" shall have
the right, at any time and front time to time, to ma-
ke its own determinations of the Transportation Age-
ncy's public funding requirements, which determi-
nations as from time to time amended by the "SBD",
shall be binding upon the parties in determining the
Operating Deficit, and notwithstanding anything in
the Agreement to the contrary shall for all purposes
in the Agreement be used in place of the statements
of the Operating Deficit furnished to the "SBD" pur-
suant to subparagraphs 3(a) and 3(b) . If the "SBD"
at any time determine that the amount of the Trans-
por:tation Agency's Operating Deficit is le'ss than
the amount paid by the "SBD" the Transportation Age-
ncy under the Agreemehit,, the "SBD" shall have the
right, at its option, to either require the Trans-
portation Agency to immediately repay the excess am-
ount to the "SBD" or to offset the amount of the ex-
cess payment against any amounts payable by the "SB -
D's to the Transportation Agency under the Agreement
or under any other agreement,
f In the event of any material breach or violation by
the Transportation Agency of any term, condition,
covenant or agreement of the Agreement (without lim-
iting by implication the generality of the fore-
going, any violation of paragraph 7 shall be deemed
to constitute a material violation) or in the event
that the Transportation Agency's, application for the
Gra ' nt or any of the information furnished by the
Transportation Agency to the "SBD" pursuant to the
Agreement contains any untrue statement of a ma-
terial fact or omits to state a material fact neces-
sary in order to make the statement made, in the
light of the circumstances under which they were ma-
de, not misleading, the "SBD" shall have the right
at any time within one year after it obtains know-
ledge of such event to (i) require the Transporta-
tion Agency to immediately repay the "SBD" all
amounts paid by the "SBD" to the Transportation
Agency under the Agreement,, or such lesser amount as
the "SBD" in its sole discretion shall determine,
and (ii) terminate all future payments, if any, due
under the Agreement; provided, however, that the
"SBD" shall give the Transportation Agency at least
30 days advance written notice before taking any
such action; and further provided that if the Trans-
............
R
.......... "I . ..... -
9
portation Agency within 30 days a iter receipt of
such notice, proposes a plan of remedial action to
the "SBD" in respect of the event (for which purpose
the "SBD" shall accord the Transportation Agency an
opportunity to meet with the "SBD" if requested by
the Transportation Agency) and if such plan is found
by the "SBD" to be acceptable, the "SBD" shall not
take the action permitted by this subparagraph 4(f)
on account of such event if such plan is duly imple-
mented and fully performed by the Transportation
Agency. The ""SBD" s" remedies under this subpara-
graph 4(f) for breach or violation of the Agreement
by the Transportation Agency are not exclusive, and
shall not be deemed to be in lieu of any rights or
remedies which the "SBD" may have at law or equity.
5. Recovery, of Payments in Respect of Depreciation
In the event that the "SBD" should purchase from the
Transportation Agency any asset in respect of which the
"SBD" has funded any depreciation, the amount of the pur-
chase price to the "SBD" of such asset shall be reddced by
the amount of the depreciation in respect of such asset
funded by the "SBD". In the event that the Transportation
Agency should sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise dispose
of any such asset the Transportation Agency shall repay to
the "SBD" the amount of the depreciation in respect there-
of which the "SBD" has funded; provided, however, that the
Transportation Agency shall not be obligated to pay the
"'SBD"' more than it received for such asset or the then
fair market value therof, which is greater.
6. Use of Grant Proceeds and Operati,ag Income.
The proceeds of the Grant and operating income shall be
used by the Transportation Agency solely for the purpose
of (i) paying Funded Capital Expenses, and (ii) paying
Operating Expenses incurred by it during the Grant Period
in operating the Project.
7. Accomplishment of the Pro it_Ct,.
(a) The Transportation Agency shall commence, carry on,
and complete the Project (as described in Exhibit A)
with all practicable dispatch, in a sound, economi-
cal, and efficient manner, and in accordance with
the provisions hereof and the Paratransit Grant Pro-
gram Application, also known as the Service Develop-
ment/Demonstration Grant Program Application.
- 10 -
The Transportation Agency and its Third Party Pro-
viders in operating the Project, and in performing
its obligations under. this Agreement shall comply
with all applicable provisions of federal, state and
local law. Al], limits or standards set forth in
this Agreement to he observed in the performance of
the Project are minimum requirements and shall not
affect the application of more restrictive federal,
state or local standards to the performance of the
Project.
(c) The Transportation Agency shall initiate and pro-
secute to completion all proceedings necessary to
enable the Transportation Agency to provide its
share of the Net Project Costs at or prior to the
t ime such f unds" are needed to meet the Net Project
Costs.
(d) The Transportation Agency shall submit to the "SBD"
such data, reports , records, contracts and other
documents relating to the Project as the "SBD" may
require. The Transportation Agency shall retain
intact, for three year: following the date of this
Agreement, all documents, financial records, and
supporting documents relating to the Project,
The Transportation Agency shall immediately notify
the "SBD" of any change in conditions or of any
event which may significantly affect its ability to
perform the Project in accordance with the provi-
sions of this Agreement.
(f) The "SBD" shall not be subject to any obligations or
liabilities from contracts of the Transportation
Agency or its subcontractors or any other person not
a party of this Agreement in connection with the
performance of the' Project.
(J T n the even I-- tha t the "S131)" noti f ies the Transporta-
tion Agency that any of the funds or monies received
by the Transportation Agency under this Agreement
consist of federal or state financial assistance
funds f roin the Department of Transportation, t h e
Urban Mass Transportation Administration or from any
other source, the Transportation Agency shall comply
with any and all the terms and conditions of such
federal or state financial asist-ante.
'I'� ... . .... . ..
(h) All documents, including, but not limited to, speci-
f ications, tracings, drawings and reports, prepared
by the Transportation Agency and its contractors in
connection with the Project shall become the pro-
perty of the "SBD" upon the earlier of the termina-
tion of this Agreement or the completion of the Pro-
ject.
Upon ten days written notice to the Transportation
Agency, the Transportation Agency shall prepare and
furnish such periodic work progress reports as may
be requested by the "SBD" . The Transportation
Agency shall make and maintain records of all time
actually spent and costs incurred in performing the
Project and shall, upon 15 days notice from the
##SBD", make such records available for inspection,
copying or audit by the "SBD" at any time during
normal business hours,, at the "SBD's" off ices 300
North State Street, Chicago Illinois,
Transportation Agency hereby binds itself, its suc-
cessors and assigns, to indemnify and save harmless
the "SBD" from all loss, damage or expense (includ-
ing attorneys fees) due to any claim brought against
the "SBD" for alleged infringement of United States
Patent, arising from any material or design specifi-
ed in, or supplied pursuant to this Agreement,
8. Audit/I.nspection.
The "SBD", or any designee of the "SBD",, may per-
form, at any time, one or more audits of the books,
records and accounts of the Transportation Agency
and its Third Party Provider with regard to the Pro-
ject. The Transportation Agency agrees to preserve,
and to cause its Third Party Providers to preserve
for a period of three years after the date of this
Agreement, and to make available to the "SBD".. or to
its designee, any and all work, check, payrolls,
invoices, contracts, agreements, vouchers, orders,
work sheets, accounting documents, correspondence
and other data pertaining to the Project. The "SBD"
and its designees shall have access to all the
various records and documents referred to in this
paragraph during the Transportation Agency's regular
business hours,
The Transportation Agency agrees that the "SBD" may,
at reasonable times, conduct such inspections or
examinations of the Project as the "SBD" deems to be
advisable in connection with this Agreement. In
- 12 -
addition,. the, Transportation Agency shall obtain for
the "SBD" the right toy conduct such inspections and
examinations of any part of the services provided by
any Third Party Provider in respect to the Project
and of the Third Party Provider's business and
operations as the "SBD" deems to be appropriate.
9. Limits of Liability -.1 . . ........ No A,
_ 9ency
The Transportation Agency agrees that no liability arising
out of the Transportation Agency's use or application of
the Grant proceeds received by the Transportation Agency
under this Agreement, shall be incurred by the "SBD". The
Transportation Agency further agrees that the Authority
has no obligations to the Transportation Agency other than
as expressly set forth in this Agreement; and that the
"SBD" has no obligation of any kind whatsoever to make
additional or future grants to the Transportation Agency.
Without limiting the foregoing, it is further understood
that in the event the "SBD", in its sole discretion,
should determine to make a future or additional grant to
the Transportation Agency, the terms and conditions of any
such grant shall not in any manner be limited or restrict-
ed by any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.,
10. EmTloyees*
(a) The Transportation Agency agrees that with respect
to persons employed by it to operate the Project,
that it will comply with all the applicable require-
ments of federal, state and local labor laws, and
without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
the requirements of applicable federal, state and
local law with regard to the minimum wages to be
paid to its etnployees, limitations upon the employ-
ment of minors, minimum fair wage standards for
minors, the payment of wages due employees, and all
applicable regula'tions established according to law
to protect the health and safety of employees,
(b) The Transportation Agency shall ' provide and assume
full financial responsibility for the fair and equi-
table protection of its public transportation ser-
vice related employees and any other employees of
the Transportation Agency 'affected by the Agreement
(herein collectively referred to as the "subject
employees") from any adverse effect upon them of the
actions of the "SBD" in making and performing the
Agreement- provided, however, that if any part or
parts of the Grant are not paid pursuant to sub -
V77
13
paragraph 4 (d ) for lack of available funds, the
"SBD" shall provide and assume full financial
responsibility for the fair and equitable protection
of the subject employees to the extent, and only to
the extent, that the s ' ubject employees have a legal
right, if any, under the Act of protection from any
adverse effect upon them resulting from the non-
payment of such part or parts of the Grant. The
Transportation Agency agrees pursuant to Section
2. 16 of the Act to promptly and in good faith ne-
gotiate with the subject employees through their
accredited representatives authorized to act for
them, fair and equitable employee arrangements to
provide fair and equitable protection for the sub-
ject employees against the actions of the "SBD" in
making and performing the Agreement, which
protection shall not be less than that established
pursuant to Section 13(c) of the Urban Mass
Transportation Act of 1964, as amended (49 U.S.C.
Sec. 1609(c)), and Section 405(b) of the Rail
Passenger Service Act of 1970, as amended (45 U.S.C.
Sec. 565(b)) and as prescribed by the United States
Secretary of Labor thereunder at the time of the
protective agreement or arbitration decision provid-
ing protection; provided, however, that in lieu of
negotiating new and separate protective labor
arrangements, the Transportation Agency may cause
its obligations under this paragraph 10(b) to be
covered by an existing protective labor arrangement
meeting the requirements of this paragraph 10(b).
If agreement cannot be reached on the terms of such
protective labor arrangement, any party may submit
any matter in dispute to binding arbitration on the
terms and in the manner provided in Section 2.16 of
the Act. Any protective labor arrangement entered
into by the Transportation Agency' pursuant to this
paragraph 10(b) must be in accordance with such pro-
tective labor guidelines as the "SBD" may from time
to time establish, The Transportation Agency shall
notify the "SBD" of any protective labor negotia-
tions being conducted pursuant to this paragraph
10(b) shall permit the "SBD" to participate therein
if the "SBD" so requests,, and shall not enter into
any protective labor arrangement pursuant to this
paragraph 10(b) without the "SBD's" prior approval
of the terms and conditions thereof .
Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the
contrary, all reasonable expenses incurred by the
Transportation Agency during the Grant Period in
performing its protective labor obligations under
this paragraph 10(b) or its protective labor obliga-
14 -
'k ---ions under any prior financial assistance agreement
between the Transportation Agency and the "SBD"
shall be deemed to constitute "Operating Expenses"
for purposes of determining the Transportation
Agency's public funding requirements; provided, how-
ever, that any expenses resulting from changes, with
respect to the Project, not made at the direct and
primary initiation of the "SBD" or not otherwise
approved in writing by the "SBD" or resulting from
changes in e ' mployment practices not made at the
direct and
.primary initiation of the "SBD" or not
otherwise approved in writing by the "SBD", shall
not be deemed to constitute "Operating Expenses" for
purposes of determining the Transportation Agency's
public funding requirements.
(c) The Transportation Agency will utilize drivers for
this service who are properly qualified and lawfully
licensed for the service provided in the vehicles
used, and have received appropriate safety training.
Drivers shall display proper courtesy toward passen-
gers and maintain a neat and clean appearance. The
Transportation Agency shall utilize drivers for this
service who meet the physical qualifications
established by the U.S. Department of Transportation
guidelines. The Transportatio'n Agency shall parti-
cipate in driver safety training programs, if any,
established by the SBD during .the term of this
agreement,
11. Enviromental and Safety Standards,
The Transportation Agency agrees that, with respect to the
Project, it will comply with all applicable federal,
state, and local laws, rules and regulations regulating
the discharge of materials into the environment, or other-
wise relating to the protection of the environment, in-
cluding without limitation the Clean Air Act, as amended
( 42 (I.s. r�. 1857 et seq.). the Federal Water Pollution
Control pXct, as amended (33 U.S.C. 12 51 e t seq.) and
implementing regulations issued by the I Environmental Pro-
tection Agency. The Transportation Agency agrees that in
performing and operating the Project 'it will comply with
all provisions of general or special orders, rules or re-
gulations issued by the Illinois Commerce Commission pur-
suant to Section 57 of an "Act Concerning Public Titili-
tiesp" approved June 29, 1921, as amended (Ill. Rev.
Stat., 1973, Ch. 111-2/3- 61) applicable to the Project.
The Transportation Agency in performing and operating the
Project shall comply with all environmental and safety
standards and guidelines which the "SBD11 may from time to
time establish pursuant to Section 2.10 and Section 2.11
of the Regional Transportation "SBD" Act. Upon request
from the "SRD"r the Transportation Agency shall furnish
the "'.SBD"" with evidence, of compliance with the above
re(wi rein(.!nts. 4
12. E ual Em to meat 02nortunitv; Minoru�Business,
Enter rises
(a) The Transportation Agency agrees that it will comply
with the provisions of Title VI of the United States
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352,f 78 Stat. 241,
42 U.S.C. 2000(a)), as the same may be amended and
the rules and regulations of the Department of
Transportation issued thereunder.
(b) The Transportation 'Agency agrees that it will comply
with the Illinois Human Rights Act (111. Rev. Stat.,
Ch. 68, Sec. 101 et. seq.) as the same may be amend-
ed, and with the rules and regulations cit the
Illinois Human Commission (The "Commission") issued
thereunder. In compliance with RTA Board Ordinance
# 80-51, the Transportation Agency shall obtain and
supply to the "SBD" a copy of , an "Employment Report
Form Prequalification,," Form PC -1, and an affirma-
tive action program covering the Transportation
Agency's employment practices with regard to persons
employed by the Transportation *Agency to operate the
program. Prior to the execution of this Agreement,
the Transportation Agency shall furnish the "SBD"
with evidence that it has filed such forms with the
Commission. The affirmative action program shall
meet the requirements of subparagraph 12(c) below.
The Transportation Agency shall promptly furnish the
"SBD" with a copy of any and all documents filed by
it with the Commission,
(c) The Transportation Agency agrees that, in connection
with the Project, no discrimination shall be made in
any term or aspect of employment because of race,
color, religion, sex, national origin or ancestry,
physical or mental handicap unrelated to ability, or
an unfavorable discharge from military service, or
political reasons or factors. The Transportation
Agency shall take affirmative action to insure that
applicants are employed and that employees are
treated during employment without regard to their
race, color, religion, sex, national origin or
ancestry, physical or mental handicaps unrelated to
ability, or an unfavorable discharge from military
service. Such action shall include, but not be
limited to the following: employment, hiring, up-
grading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, recruit-
ment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of
pay or other forms of compensation, and selection
for training including apprenticeship. The Trans-
portation Agency shall insert a provision similar to
the foregoing in all subcontracts relating to the
public transportation services, except subcontracts
for standard commercial supplies or raw materials.
f
(d) The Transportation Agency Agrees as follows:
In the event of the Transportation Agency's non-
compliance with' any provision of this Equal Employ-
ment Opportunity Clause, the Illinois Human Rights
Act or the Human Rights Commission's Rules and Regu-
lations for Public Contracts..' the Transportation
Agency may be declared nonresponsible and therefore
ineligible for future contracts or subcontracts with
the State of Illinois or any of its political sub-
divisions or municipal corporations, and this Agree-
ment may be cancelled or avoided in whole or in
Part, and such other sanctions or penalties may be
imposed or remedies invoked as provided by statute
or regulation. During the performance of this
Agreement, the Transportation Agency agrees as
follows:
(1) That it will not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of
race, color, religion, sex, national origin or
ancestry, physical or mental handicap unrelated
to ability,' or an unfavorable discharge from
military service.- and further that it will
examine .all job classifications to determine if
minority persons or women are underutilized and
will take appropriate affirmative action to
rectify any such underutilization,
N,
(2) That, if it hires additional employees in order
to perform this Agreement or any portion here -
Of, it will determine the availability (in
accocordance with the Commission's Rules and
Regulations for Public Contracts) of minorities
and women in the area (s) from which it may
reasonably recruit and it will hire for each
job classification for which employees are hir-
ed in such a way that minorities and women are
not underutilized.
3) That, in all solicitations or advertisements
for employees placed by it or on its behalf, it
will state that all applicants will be afforded
equal opportunity without discrimination be-
cause of race, color, religion, sex, national
origin or ancestry, physical or mental handicap
unrelated to ability, or an unfavorable dis-
charge from military service.
.......... ...... . ......
3p)
17
f That it will send to each labor organization or
representative of workers with which it has or
is bound by a collective bargaining or other
agreement or understanding, a notice advising
such labor organization or representative of
the Transportation Agency's obligations under
the Illinois Human Rights Act and the Com-
mission's Rules and Regulations for Public
Contracts. If any such labor organization or
representative fails or refuses to cooperate
with the Transportation Agency in its efforts
to comply with such Act and Rules and Regu-
lations, the Transportation Agency will prompt-
ly so notify the Illinois Human Rights
Commission and the "SBD" and will recruit
employees from other sources when necessary to
fulfill its obligations thereunder.
5) That it will submit reports as required by the
Illinois Human Rights Commission's Rules and
Regulations for Public Contracts, furnish all
relevant information as may from time to time
be requested by the Commission or the Author -
i ty, and in all respects comply with the
Illinois Human Rights Act and the Commission's
Rules and Regulations for Public Contracts,
(6) That it will permit access to all relevant
books, records, accounts and work sites by per-
sonnel of the "SBD" and the Illinois Human
Rights Commission for purposes of investigation
to ascertain compliance with the Illinois Human
Rights Act and the Commission's Rules and Regu-
lations for Public Contracts.
(7) That it will include verbatim or by reference
the provisions of paragraphs 1 through 7 of
this clause in every performance subcontract as
defined in Section 1.1(17) (b) of the Commis-
sion's Rules and Regulations so that such
provisions will be binding upon every such
subcontractor; and that it will also include
the provisions of paragraphs 1, 5, 6 and 7 in
every supply subcontract as defined in Section
1.1(17) (a) of the Commission's Rules and
Regulations so that such provisions will be
binding upon every such subcontractor. In the
same manner as with other provisions of this
Agreement, the Transportation Agency will be
liable for compliance with applicable provi-
sions of this clause by all its subcontractors;
and further it will promptly notify the Autho-
rity and the Illinois Human Rights Commission
� MOM
in the event any subcontractor fails or refuses to comply
therewith. In addition, the Transportation Agency will
not utilize any subcontractor declared by the Commission
to be nonresponsible and therefore ineligible for con-
tracts or subcontracts with the State of Illinois or any
of its political subdivisions or municipal corporations.
(e) In connection with the performance of this Agree-`
ment, the Transportation Agency will provide for the
maximum utilization -,of minority business enterprises
and will use its best efforts to insure that
minority business enterprises shall have the maximum
practicable opportunity to compete for contract and
subcontract work under this Agreement,
13. Certain Covenants.
Unless the "SBD" shall otherwise consent in writing, for
the duration of the Grant. Period, the Transportation
Agency shall:
(a) Keep and maintain at its present offices (i) proper
books of account in respect of the Project, and
record therein full and true entries of all its
transaction's in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and practices consistently
applied, and (ii) complete records concerning the
performance and operation of the Project.
(b) Pay and discharge when due all of its obligations
and indebtedness in respect of the Project, provided
that any such obligation or indebtedness need not be
paid if the validity thereof shall currently be
contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings
and if there shall have been set aside on its books
adequate reserves with respect thereto, except that
all such obligations and indebtedness shall be paid
forthwith upon an adverse decision in such proceed-
ings and the exhaustion of available appellate
relief with respect thereto.
(c) Fully comply with all leases, contracts and agree-
ments relating, directly or indirectly, to the Pro-
ject to which it is a party; do all things necessary
to preserve, renew and keep in full force and effect
all rights, licenses and approvals necessary to per-
form and operate the Project; and comply with all
federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations
and others applicable to the Project.
_11 J, 11 1
19
(d) Perform and operate the Project, and its business
and operations as they relate to the Project, in a
sound, economical and efficient manner, and imple-
ment such policies and programs to improve project
efficiencies and effectiveness as the "SBD" may
request.
(e) Furnish the "SBD" with notice in writing of all
actions, suits and proceedings before any court or
governmental department, commission, board, bureau,
agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign,
arising out of or relating to the operation of the
Project; provided, however, this requirement shall
not apply to personal injury or property damage
actions or proceedings involving a claim for damages
of less than $30,000 in the aggregate, defense of
which has been tendered and accepted under an
insurance policy.
f Furnish the "SBD" with copies of, and obtain the
"SBD's" prior written approval of, all applications
(including all amendments or modifications to pre-
viously filed applications) for federal, state or
local grants, subsidies, loans or other funding
relating to the Project or to any other public
transportation services,
(g) maintain, or cause to be maintained, all vehicles
and facilities used in operating the Project in good
repair and in safe and clean condition.
(h) Not enter into, renew, extend, modify, or amend any
agreement or understanding with a Third Party Pro-
vider without first reviewing the terms and condi-
tions of such agreement or understanding with the
"SBD" and obtaining the "SBD's" prior written
approval thereof, which approval shall not be un-
reasonably withheld.
In the event that the "SBD" notifies the Transporta-
tion Agency that any of the funds or monies received
by the Transportation Agency under the Agreement
consist of federal financial assistance funds from
the Department of Transportation, the Urban Mass
Transportation Administration or from any other
federal agency, comply with any and all of the terms
and conditions of such federal financial assistance,
including, without limitation, conditions pertaining
to rates charged to elderly and handicapped persons,
the provision of charter bus operations, the pro-
vision of school bus operations, and employment.
In accordance wit -h specifications of the "SBD" F
place such identification strips, markings symbols
and/or logos on the equipment and facilities used in
operating the Project as may be requested by the
"SBD" and participate in such promotional programs
as may be requested by the "SBD".
14. Third Party Providers.
The Transportation Agency shall cause each of its Third
Party Providers to comply with all provisions of subpara-
graph 10(a) and paragraphs 11, 12, and 13 as if the name
of the Third Party Provider had been substituted for the
name of the Transportation Agency therein; shall cause
each of its Third Party Providers to provide and assume
full financial responsibility for the fair and equitable
protection of its employees opererating the Project from
any adverse effect upon them of the "SBD" in making and
performing the Agreement; and shall cause each of its
Third Party Providers to promptly and in good faith ne-
gotiate with its employees operating the Project through
their accredited representatives authorized to act for
them, fair and equitable employee arrangements to provide
fair and equitable protection for such employees against
actions of the "SBD" in making and performing the Agree-
ment,, which protection shall not be less than that
established pursuant to Section 13(c) of the Urban Mass
Transportation Act of 1964, as amended, and Section 405(b)
of the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, as amended, and
as prescribed by the United States Secretary of Labor
thereunder, at the time of the protective agreement or ar-
bitration decision providing protection. Any protective
labor arrangement entered. into by the Third Party Provider
pursuant to this paragraph 14 must be in accordance with
such protective labor guidelines as the "SBD" may from
time to time establish. The Transportation Agency shall
cause the Third Party Provider ( i) to notify the "SBD" of
any protective labor negotiations being conducted pursuant
to this paragraph 14, (ii) to permit the "SBD" to
participate therein if the "SBD" so requests, and iii)
not to enter into any protective labor arrangement pur-
suant to this paragraph 14 without the - "SBDIs" prior
approval of the terms and conditions thereof .
15. 0, nion of Counsel.
The Transportation Agency shall furnish the "SBD" with an
opinion of its counsel, dated as of a date within five (5)
days before the execution of this Agreement, to the
.. . .. .. . . 21
effect that (i) it has corporate power to engage in and
carry on the public transportation services as and where
then conducted; (ii) it the execution, -delivery and
performance of this Agreement by it has been duly autho-
rized and approved by all the requisite action of its
corporate authorities, and this Agreement has been duly
executed and delivered by it, and upon the exectition and
delivery of this Agreement by all of the parties hereto
this Agreement will constitute a valid and binding obliga-
tion of the Transportation Agency enforceable in accor-
dance with its terms, and the consummation and compliance
by the Transportation Agency with the terms and conditions
of this Agreement will not result in any breach or
violation of, or default under, any judgment, decree,
mortgage, agreement, indenture or other instrument applic-
able to it known to such counsel; and (iii) all such
approvals, consents, authorizations or modifications as
may be required to permit the performance by the Transpor-
tation Agency of its obligations under this Agreement have
been obtained, whether from governmental authorities or
other persons.,
16. Indemnification,
The Transportation Agency hereby assumes liability for and
agrees to protect, hold harmless and indemnify the
Authority and the "SBD's" successors, assigns, officers,
directors, employees, agents and servants from and against
any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages,
penalties, judgements, settlements, claims, actions,
Suits, prodeedingst costs., expenses and disbursements, in-
cluding legal fees and expenses, of whatever kind and
nature, imposed on, incurred by or asserted against the
"SBD" and/or any of the "SBDISNI successors, assigns,
officers, directors, employees, agents and servants, in
any way relating to or arising out of any of the following
or allegations, claims or charges of any of the following:
the use or application of the Grant proceeds by the Trans-
portation Agency; the violation by the Transportation
Agency of any of its covenants or agreements under the
Agreement; any tort or other action or failure to act
which shall be done in connection with the performance or
operation of the -Project; any act or failure to act of any
officer, director, employee, agent or servant of the
Transportation Agency; and any injury to any person, loss
of life, or loss or destruction of property in any way
arising out of or relating to the performance or operation
of the Project. The "SBD" agrees to promptly notify the
Transportation Agency in writing of any claim or liability
which the "SBD" believes to be covered under this para-
graph. The Authority shall tender, and the Transportation
� 22 -
Agency shall promptly 'accept tender of, defense in connec-
tion with any claim or liability in respect of which the
Transportation Agency has agreed in writing that based on
the face of the claim or liability the "SBD'" is entitled
to indemnification under this paragraph; provided, how-
ever, that the counsel retained by the Transportation
Agency to defend the "SBD" shall be satisfactory to the
"SBD"; and further provided that the "SBD" shall be kept
fully informed of the status of the proceeding, shall be
promptly furnished with copies of all documents filed or
served by the plaintiffs or complaining parties, and shall
be furnished in advance with copies of all documents pro-
posed to be filed or served on its behalf by the defense
counsel. In 'the event that the Transportation Agency,,
wi,thin ten (10) days after receipt, of notice from the
"SSD" of a claim or liability which the ""SBD"" believes to
be covered under this paragraph, fails to advise the "SBD"
in writing that the Transportation Agency agrees that the
"SBD" is entitled to indemni`f icat "ion under this paragraph
based on the face of such claim or liability, the "SBD"
without waiving or prejudicing any claim or right it may
have to indemnification, under this . paragraph (including
the recovery of legal fees and expe'nses), may retain its
own counsel and present its own defense in connection with
such claim or liability. The "SBD"O, 'Without first obta'
in-
ing the approval of the Transportation Agency, shall not
settle or compromise any claim, suit, action or proceeding
in respect of which the Transportation Agency has agreed
in writing that the "SBD" is entitled to indemnification
under this paragraph. Notwithstanding anything in the
Agreement to the contrary, unless otherwise approved
specifically -in writing by the "SBD", no indemnification
payments made by the Transportation Agency to the "SBD"
pursuant to this paragraph or pursuant to an indemnifica-
tion provision in any other agreement between the Trans-
portation Agency and the "SBD" shall be deemed to con-
stitute operating expenses for purposes of determining the
Transportation Agency's operating deficit under the Agree-
ment, Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the
contrary, the indemnities contained, in this paragraph
shall survive the termination of the Agreement,
17. Coordinated Risk Management Program,
The Transportation Agency agrees that it the "SBD" during
the Grant Period requests the Transportation Agency to
adopt or enter or remain in a coordinated program of
23
risk management, the Transportation Agency will adopt,
enter or remain in such program. Such program may specify
limits on deductible losses or insured amounts. Such pro-
gram may also include the administration of the program 'by
the "SBD" itself, including the payment by the. "SBD" of
claims made against the Transportation Agency. If the
"SBD" and the Transportation Agency adopt and enter into
any such coordinated program of risk management, the
Transportation Agency agrees that (i) any refunds or pre-
mium returned to the Transportation Agency by any
insurance company will be immediately paid to the "SBD".
and (ii) any funds or deposits reserved or set aside by
the Transportation Agency as provision for injuries and
damages which occurred on or after the beginning coverage
date of the program and any monetary provision for future
claims, will be paid to the "SBD" at such time as the
'"SBD" and Transportation Agency adopt and enter into such
coordinated program of risk management. Nothing in this
paragraph shall be interpreted to mean that the "SBD"
shall be liable or responsible for the actions of the
Transportation Agency .
18, Inde endence of Transportation LQenc y.
In the performance of its duties, covenants and agreements
under the Agreement, the Transportation Agency is not the
agent of the "SBD" and shall not hold itself out as the
agent of the "SBD". The Transportation Agency agrees that
none of its officers, employees, or agents by reason of
the Agreement is, or is authorized to hold themselves out
as or claim to be, an officer, employee or agent of the
"SBD'" , and that none of them is to be permitted by reason
of the Agreement to make any claim, demand or application
to or for any right or privilege applicable to any
officer, employee or agent of the "SBD", including but not
limited to, rights and privileges concerning workmen's
compensation and occupational disease coverage, unemploy-
ment compensation benefits, social security coverage or
retirement or credit benefits.
19. Non -Collusion.
The Transportation Agency warrants and represents that it
has not paid and agrees not to pay any bonus, commission,
fee or gratuity to any employee or official of the "SBD"
for the purpose of obtaining the Agreement. No officer or
employee of the "SBD" or member or delegate to the
Illinois General Assembly or the Congress of the United
States shall be admitted to any share or part of the
Agreement or to any direct or indirect benefit (other than
as a passenger in the normal operation of the Project)
arising therefrom.
- 24 -
20. Non -Waiver.
The "SBD" shall not be deemed to have waived any right
under the Agreement unless such waiver is in writing,
signed by an authorized officer of the 11SBD'1, No delay or
omission in exercising any right under the Agreement shall
operate as a waiver of such right or any other right. All
the rights and remedies of the "SBD" under the Agreement
shall be cumulative and not exclusive, and may be exercis-
ed singly or concurrently. The waiver or exercise of any
remedy shall not be construed as a waiver of any other
remedy available hereunder or under general principles of
law or equity,
21. Successors and Ass iqEs.
All covenants, agreements, representations and warranties
in the Agreement made by or on behalf of the Transporta-
tion Agency or the warranties in the Agreement made by or
on behalf of the Transportation Agency or the "SBD" shall
bind and inure to the benefit of the respective successors
and assigns of such party.
22. Notices.
Any written notice required or permitted by this Agreement
may be delivered by depositing it in the United States
Mail., postage prepaid, 'addressed to the "SBD" at 300 North
State Street, Chicago, Illinois '60610"; and to the Trans-
portation Agency at the address of the Transportation
Agency first set forth in Part I of this Agreement.
23. 'Agreement to Supersede Other Aqreementsr Arran ements and
UnderstanqLnqs .
The parties agree that the Agreement constitutes the
entire agre(:ment between the parties in respect of the
subject matter hereof, that there are no agreements,
Arrangements or understandings, implied or expressed, in
respect of the subject matter hereof except as set forth
specifically herein .and that all prior and contemporaneous
agreements, arrangements and understandings in respect of
the subject matter hereof are merged into and contained in
the Agreement. No covenant or condition not expressed in
the Agr(yiment shall affect or be effective to interpret,
change or restrict the Agreement. Without limiting by
implication and generality of the foregoing, the Agreement
25
shall supersede any and all prior a( re,,ements, arrangements
and understandings hetween the "S13D" and th(-,- Transporta-
tion Agency in respect of funding any expenses, deficits
or funding requirements incurred by the Transportation
Agency in providing any public transportation during any
part or parts of the Grant Period, so that any payments
made by the "SBD" to the Transportation Agency under any
such agreements, arrangements and understandings in re-
spect of funding any expenses, deficits or funding
requirements incurred by the Transportation Agency in pro-
viding any public transportation during any part or parts
of the Grant Period shall be deemed to be payments by the
"SBD" under the Agreement, shall be deemed to constitute
part of the Grant proceeds, and shall he subject to all of
the terms and conditions of the Agreement.
24. Governing Law.
This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and
be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois.
25. Assignment.
The Transportation Agency agrees that this Agreement shall
not be assigned or transferred without the written consent
of the "SBD" and that any successor to the Transportation
Agency's rights under this Agreement will be required to
accede to all of the terms, conditions and requirements of
this Agreement as a condition precedent to such succes-
sion.
Or 6. Severabili�y_
The parties agree that if any provision of this Agreement
shall be held invalid for any reasons whatsoever, the
remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby if such
remaining provisions could then continue to conform with
the purposes, terms and requirements of applicable law.
27. Titles and Precedent.
The parties agree that the titles of the Sections of this
Agreement are inserted for convenience or identification
only and shall not be considered for any other purpose,
28. Documents Forminq This Aareement.
The parties agree that this Agreement together with the
Exhibits attached hereto and made a part hereof, consti-
tute the entire agreement between the parties pertaining
to the subject matter hereof, that there are no agreements
or understandings, implied or expressed, except as set
forth specifically herein and that all prior and contempo-
raneous agreements and understandings, in this connection,
are merged into and contained i -n this Agreement. No cove-
nant or condition not expressed in this Agreement shall
affect or be effective to interpret, change or restrict
this Agreement.
29. Amendment.
The Agreement may not be -amended unless reduced to a
written document signed by the "SBD" and the Transporta-
tion Agency.
ail
Summar of services
Upon mutual agreement of the parties hereto, this Exhibit A may be
updated by a Paratransit Department Manager's memorandum to reflect
decisions made with regard to the project's design, budget and
operations, subsequent to the execution of this Agreement. It is
expressly agreed between the parties that such actions will be
consistent with the general summary and scope of theproject as
specified. However, it should be noted that any change in maximum
grant amount or material change in the scope of the project would
require either a new Grant Agreement or an Amendment to this Agreement.
The shared -ride taxi service is available twenty four hours a day
seven days a week for elderly and mobility limited residents of
Mount Prospect traveling anywhere within the Village and to two
area hospitals located near the Village boundaries. Birks Transpor-
tation Company and American Taxi Service operate the service. The
fare for intravillage travel is $2.50 a trip. Passengers pay $1.00
and the Village subsidizes the remaining $1.50 of the fixed rate.
Metered rates are used once the taxi leaves the Village boundaries.
The only exceptions are trips provided to the Holy Family Hospital
(where the passenger is responsible for paying $1.65 of the $3.15
fare) and to the Northwest Community Hospital (where thepassenger
pays $2.15 of the $3.65 fare). Residents must present a signed
program identification card to the driver when paying their fare in
order to receive the Village subsidy. SBD retains the right to set
the fare for service. However, revision in this fare may be e made
by SBD by _notifying the Transportation Agency thirty (30) days in
advance of the effective date. This service will be coordinated
with adjacent SBD and RTA funded and SBD Vehicle Lease services
within the area wherever feasible and will honor all applicable RTA
--and SBD transfer agreements.
A- 2
SBD shall rei,-,.burse the Transportation Agency for all Monthly Tickets
used on the paratransit system and properly recorded by passenger
type and date of use in the monthly operating report. SBD will
reimburse the Transportation Agency for each use of the Monthly
Ticket on the paratransit service at a rate specified in the RTA
Paratransit Service Procedures as may be updated from time to time
in accordance with official SBD fare policies. This reimbursement
will be exclusive of the local share requirements applicable to
project operating expenses. The reimbursement income for honoring
the Monthly Tickets that will be returned to the Transportation
Agency by SBD shall be included as fare income in the Monthly
Operating Report.
The Transportation Agency will assume full responsibility for the
following-,
1. To oversee day to day operation of the service;
2. To select and train all personnel involved in the
operation of the service;
I
3. To -maintain -required records, including dispatching records
and submit reports as prescribed by SBD. Data to be collected
and submitted on a monthly basis include:
(a) Revenue (fares, donations, and other);
(b) Number of One -Way Passenger Trips;
(c)_ Number of Vehicle Hours;
(d) Number of Vehicle Miles;
(e) Operating costs incurred in the operation of the
service, set forth in an itemized record as prescribed
by SBD.
Estimated Bud et
Total Cost:
Revenue:
Net Cost:
Local Share. -
Maximum SBD Cost:
$41,250
$16,500
$24,750
$ 6,187
$18,563
I Hr r
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
No capital funding is required from the Authority for
the project.
Is
EXHIBIT C
The maximum subsidy amount per trip will be $2,1550 for
the grant period.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois iL ",
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
*Z_
TO: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1985
SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF VILLAGE PROPERTY
Attached is a memorandum from the Director of Public Works, a
letter from La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., and a letter from Mr.
Weeks. These documents relate to a proposal that the staff has
been evaluating since late last year.
Years ago, the Village installed a sewer line, parts of which
were outside our Corporate limits. The sewer line was installed
along the State right-of-way. Subsequently, because of improve-
ments to the MSD trunks, the Village was able to abandon the
line. Additionally, with roadway revisions, the State of
Illinois realigned parts of Oakton and Busse Roads and apparently
sold off their surplus property. The Village's sewer line, not
currently in use, lies therefore not only outside our Corporate
limits but no longer within State right-of-way.
La Quinta Motor Inns has or is purchasing property which contains
the Village sewer line and through negotiations with our staff,
we have secured a $9,000 offer from La Quinta for permanenL
abandonment of the sewer line and property.
Since the Village has no use for the sewer line, we recommend
that the Board accept the offer and enact an Ordinance disposing
of this property as abandoned.
TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
TLB/ rcw
attachment
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
To Village Manager NOW—
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: February 20, 1985
SUBS: Cash Settlement on Abandonment
of Village Property
Several
years ago a
developer wanted
to construct an apartment
complex
and shopping
center at the intersection
of Oakton and Route
83. At
that time the Village did not
have sewer service available
on-site
and to allow
the developer to
construct the project, we
installed a sewage
lift station and
force -main from 83, along
Oakton to
Busse Rd.
Several years later the MSD installed a lateral sewer trunk line
adjacent to the property at 83 and Oakton and we were able to
abandon our lift station and force -main and connect directly to the
MSD sewer. In the meantime the State of Illinois made some inter-
section improvements and modifications at the corner of Oakton,
Busse and Route 83 and our old easement for this abandoned sewer
force -main was no longer on public right-of-way.
The State has since sold off this parcel of property at the
intersection of Busse and Oakton and the developer, La Quinta Motor
Inns, Inc. wants us to abandon our unused 12" sewer force -main
which goes through their property now. Years ago one of the
thoughts was that once the sewage lift station was abandoned we
would consider the possibility of cleaning the force -main and using
it for a water main. This may be very difficult to accomplish to
make it sterile and we really don't know the kind of shape it is
in, especially at the Higgins Creek crossing.
As an alternative to LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc. I proposed two
options so they could develop their property:
14 Relocate our 1211 main around their property on public right-
of-way or,
2. Make a payment of $9,000 to the Village for abandonment of the
main within their property.
n
This one time fee would be approximately 50'/0' of the cost of a
future interconnection North of the Tollway. I would recommend the
Village accept the $9,000 and abandon that section of the unused
force -main.
HLW/eh
Attachments
Nig"
into
MOTOR INNS, INC.
ID9536N
FEDERAL EXPRESS AIRBILL NO. 609335580
February 19, 1985
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Re: La Motor Inn No. 634
Elk Grove Village, IL.
Property at Busse Road and Oakton Street
Dear Mr. Weeks:
Pursuant to our conversation of February 15, 1985, wherein I advised
you that in accordance with your letter dated January 9, 1985 La
Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. has chosen to exercise the second option,
i.e., payment of $9,000.00 to the Village of Mount Prospect which is
approximately 50% of the cost of the interconnection north of the
tollway for the 12 inch forcemain located in the Old Higgins Road
right of way near the intersection' of Busse Road and Oakton Street.
It is also my understanding that you would present this proposal to
the Village Board and advise us of approval as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
LA QUINTA MOTOR INNS, INC.
pc"s
u*
Deborah A. Wear -Rios
Legal Assistant
cc: Alan Tallis
Marilyn Boldrick
Maxine Kersey
Betty Parr
Office of the General Counsel
La Quinta Plaza • P. O. Box 32064 # San Antonio, Texas 78216 * 512-366-6000
w.1
44AYOR
41,
CAROLYN H KRALISE
TRUSTEES
RALPH W, ARTHUR
C,cRALD L FARLEY
LEO FLOR09
NORMA J. MURALISKIS
GEORGE R VAN GEEM
Village of Mount Prospect
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
VILLAGE MANAGER
TERRANCE L, BURGHARD
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 312 / 392-6000
January 9, 1984
La Quinta Motor Inns Inc.
P.O. Box 32783
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Attention: Mr. Wayne Huddleston
Re: Property at Busse Road and Oakton Street
Gentlemen:
The Village of Mount Prospect has been contacted for information
concerning the 12" forcemain located in the Old Higgins Road Right-
of-way near the intersection of Busse Road and Oakton Street, Cook County,
Illinois.
This 12" forcemain is no longer in use, however the pipe has been
plugged at both ends and was in the Village plans to be rehabilitated
and put back in use as a part of the Village Water Main system.
Abandoning the section of main across the property in question would
require the Village to interconnect the main north of the tollway. Therefore
the Village would propose two options. One, require the 12" main
be relocated around the property in question or second, require a
payment of $9,000 to the Village which is approximately 50% of the cost
of an interconnection north of the Tollway.
Yours very truly,
T
Villacie of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
g "'Inpi OJT -
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1985
SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF VILLAGE PROPERTY
Attached is a memorandum from the Director of Public Works, a
letter from La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. , and a 'letter from Mr.
Weeks. These documents relate to a proposal that the staff has
been evaluating since late last year.
Years ago, the Village installed a sewer line, parts of which
were outside our Corporate limits. The sewer line was installed
along the State right-of-way. Subsequently, because of improve-
ments to the MSD trunks, the Village was able to abandon the
line. Additionally, with roadway revisions, the State of
Illinois realigned parts of Oakton and Busse Roads and apparently
sold off their surplus property. The Village's sewer line, not
currently in use, lies therefore not only outside our Corporate
limits but no longer within State right-of-way.
La Quinta Motor Inns has or is `purchasing property which contains
the Village sewer line and through negotiations with our staff,
we have secured a $9,000 offer from La Quinta for permanenl--
abandonment of the sewer line and property.
Since the Village has no use for the sewer line, we recommend
that the Board accept the offer and enact an Ordinance disposing
of this property as abandoned.
IONSTIMInk 6�111=
TLB/rcw
attachment
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
0
pp
T0:
Village
Manager
FROM:
Director
of Public Works
DATE:
February
20, 1985
SUBJ: Cash Settlement on Abandonment
of Village Property
Several years ago a developer wanted to construct an apartment
complex and shopping center at the intersection of Oakton and Route
83. At that time the Village did not have sewer service available
on-site and to allow the developer to construct the project, we
installed a sewage lift station and force -main from 83, along
Oakton to Busse Rd.
Several years later the MSD installed a lateral sewer trunk line
adjacent to the property at 83 and Oakton and we were able to
abandon our lift station and force -main and connect directly to the
MSD sewer. In the meantime the State of Illinois made some inter-
section improvements and modifications at the corner of Oakton,
Busse and Route 83 and our old easement for this abandoned sewer
force -main was no longer on public right-of-way.
The State has since sold off this parcel of property at the
intersection of Busse and Oakton and the developer, La Quinta Motor
Inns, Inc. wants us to abandon our unused 12" sewer force -main
which goes through their property now. Years ago one of the
thoughts was that once the sewage lift station was abandoned we
would consider the possibility of cleaning the force -main and using
it for a water main, This may be very difficult to accomplish to
make it sterile and we really don't know the kind of shape it is
in, especially at the Higgins Creek crossing.
As an alternative to LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc. I proposed two
options so they could develop their property:
1. Relocate our 12" main around their property on public right-
of-way or,
2. Make a payment of $9,000 to the Village for abandonment of the
main within their property.
This one time fee would be approximately 50'/0 of the cost of a
future interconnection North of the Tollway. I would recommend the
Village accept the $9,000 and abandon that section of the unused
force -main.
HLW/eh
Attachments
MOTOR INNS, INC.
UNRWI MOL
FEDERAL EXPRESS AIRBILL NO. 609335580
February 19, 1985
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Re: La Motor Inn No. 634
Elk Grove Village, IL.
Property at Busse Road and Oakton Street
Dear Mr. Weeks:
Pursuant to our conversation of February 15, 1985, wherein I advised
you that in accordance with your letter dated January 9, 1985 La
Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. has chosen to exercise the second option,
i.e., payment of $9,000.00 to the Village of Mount Prospect which is
approximately 50% of the cost of the interconnection north of the
tollway for the 12 inch forcemain located in the Old Higgins Road
right of way near the intersection of Busse Road and Oakton Street.
It is also my understanding that you would present this proposal to
the Village Board and advise us of approval as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
LA QUINTA MOTOR INNS, INC.
Deborah A. Wear -Rios
Legal Assistant
cc: Alan Tallis
Marilyn Boldrick
Maxine Kersey
Betty Parr
Office of the General Counsel
La Quinta Plaza # R Q. Box 32064 * San Antonio, Texas 78216 * 512-366-6000
+AYOR
CAROLYN H KRAUSE
TRUSTE ES
RALPH W ART 11UR
�7,cRALD L FARLEY
LEO FLOROS
NORMA T MURAUSKIS
GEORGE R VAN GEEM
THEODORE J, WATTENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
TERRANCE L BURGHARD
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
January 9, 1984
La Quinta Motor Inns Inc.
P.O. Box 32783
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Attention: Mr. Wayne Huddleston
Re: Property at Busse Road and Oakton Street
Gentlemen:
The Village of Mount Prospect has been contacted for information
concerning the 12" forcemain located in the Old Higgins Road Right-
of-way near the intersection of Busse Road and Oakton Street, Cook County,
Illinois.
This 12" forcemain is no longer in use, however the pipe has been
plugged at both ends and was in the Village plans to be rehabilitated
and put back in use as a part of the Village Water Main system.
Abandoning the section of main across the property in question would
require the Village to interconnect the main north of the tollway. Therefore
the Village would propose two options. One, require the 12" main
be relocated around the property in question or second, require a
payment of $9,000 to the Village which is approximately 50% of the cost
of an interconnection north of the Tollway.
Yours very truly,
VIV
V1611age of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
T0: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: February 21, 1985
SUBJECT: Mount Prospect/Des-Plaines Water Interconnection
Our Engineering Division has reviewed all the bids and we are
recommending acceptance of the lowest bid as submitted by Lino
Plumbing Co., Inc. in the amount of $37,560.
Our engineer's estimate f o r this project was $57,000 a n d
initially we were quite concerned that the low bidder may have
made an error. Upon checking, all extensions on unit quantities
were correct. Their major discrepancy appears to be in the
purchase or construction of the concrete meter vault. We . have
been in touch with 'Lino Plumbing and although they are cognizant
of a judgment error on their part, they are. willing to accept the
bid award in the amount as stated.
These results have not been forwarded to the City of Des Plaines
as yet, and by terms of the agreement they also will have to give
us their approvals
e r b e r e e k s
Director Public Works
hlw/j
Attachment
N
C
D
E
F
6
I. EM FE: IS 0", 3 1 P T 10 N
GUANTITTY UNITI
UNIT
T Al i
IL L
UNIT
TOTAL I
UNIT
TO TIPL I
Till T
TOTq1 I
UNIT T
TOTAL I
UNIT T
TDTPL 1
U TC
-------
I
- - ---- - --------
A'?* D. T. "ater Y-ain Cl. 52
i.41
130 LF 1
$22. LIZ
$2 0. 001 1
6-
V-0. 03
$0 o
S34.50
$4148ci.0
$%,7j 0' .013
$31 ILA.
g!"11. 011a 1
$1
$PIS C-7
4 03
q A -11. ILI
C
T1
I IZ- x 10" Pr2ssure ConneLction
I EA 1
1 75 Z. -0 3
1 ? . VIZ 0 1
0. 0. 0
+ ?N
'00, 021 1
S" 300. 00
1.1 1
$3, IN
- ZZ. 0 1
Z
$2, 0, Z 0. ?!0
$2, e .0. eO 1
-e
$214100. 00
-
$27 4 0. 00 1
$3, 4?,0. 00
$3, 40-2.
%J
2
3
P. uf e r f1i y VEE I V 2
1 E- A 1
$+,+011.03
AV 41 13 0. to 1
$57710. 01-0
$165110. 0.0
$8940. 000
$842. CZ 1
$803. ez
5800.00 1
$1,E5,10.00
$1, 0 0- 0 1
$o. 3
s I o. 0
0 A I
4
F o'. 4.
%A 16side of 1-i,eter vault'.)
4
EV '. D. t`anhoI2
V L
EA
2 E' I
Sit C .0
14-0.00 1
VC V
$K'01 010
$41
. -7 01 0. a
$1 0.00
it ct�
$211 C:10. oa i
J�
$It 20?t. ea
$217 Gn. 0
so.o. 0.0 1
b
$11 -00 0-3
$3, -ZOO. 0Q)
9L
$1, E-:Ntl. -3
5
P:!csr Pit cl -ring
I EA 1
�00
$3 00
$5 S -
3 -'". eo 1
1! un. 00
s On.. 00 1
4 10
It -03. ez
L- J
sojc�
kj 0.00 1
$21 0H. Ol
$2, --0. eO 1
let:
$4, 500. 00
$4, -0-0. e-0 1
$1, 5`0- 1
$1, 0,
3
P,' ;2:- dia. Ste?';
41 EA I
S *-J5. et 3
s. 3 8 35 - -0 a 1
$100. 00
$4, 100. 010 1
$1614. 00
$61724. 00 1
$175. 00
$7, 175. 00 1
$15J.03
$6.3555. 00 1
$1 5 0
'$G, 1%5 1
-L v
7
22" dia. -0 IL Ca si rig
11 LF i
$6-2. 00
. CIO 1
$40. 00
444.eZ 1
$36. 00
$396.00 1
$70. 00
$770. Oil 1
$42.02
$4612. 00 1
$ '1- e.0
$2715-0�1
-
t out, A, d -2 2 r r
..eversib'A Y,=ter Inni. c-�rminers I EAI
$4, '1700. 1,10
$417�21 . eO 1
$ 31 e- 0- 0. C 3
$3131 000. 00 1
$6,000.00
$6, 0.0a. 00 1
$4, eC-0. 0.0
$4, nO. 03 1
$6, 4SO, 00
$6 -0.00 1
1 45
$5, CO
$5, 300. 0-0
3 !3.'
L,i.-CTE-',;-) ?,zt er V-Ult
L a
t EA I
6ju
scil �a . 0,3
$= 350. 00 1
j I-
$18$4W.00
$181460.0-0 1
$12,000.0.0
$12, 0-00. H 1
$16, 00v 00
$16, 010o. eo 1
$99 750.20
$9, -i,=10. 0.0 1
fig, SO o. t0
$9, -00. oa
-$111 -'-0. a
10
ti* miy=
1 EA 1
$1,473.x0
31 z
-11473. 03 1
11 ct"t. 0- 3
Ck;
$1, C-,00. a
ss, 00-0. 00.
L-
to, eoz. n I
L-
�JV
$I i,5t0. ea
$I I C� e- 0. e.
j
tic .00
00 1
$11 7�-�J. �63
$11
V
13-1 ValV2
2 :-A I
$1372�0. ?3
sl,640.�iO 1
5 0 0. a
$11 CZ0. ell I
$352t. 0 3
$1, 720. Oil
$9,10. `!o
$1, e--� j
SHO. 011Z
V, 9 0.,1 1
(insiwl-= of r.-eter Vault)
1 :2
2" "hiorin-ation Tap
I "--A 1
$EZO.00$21H.
C 3 1
?00.00
$ 2:`Z0.00 1
$300.eZ
$30& CO 1
$900.00
$900.2`0 1
$640.00
$ 40.0'0 1
4 3
0 �'-12 I
13
1" Chlr-lrnat-ion Tap
I EA I
$150.03
$150.00 I
$150.0+0
$150. CO 1
$22-0. CO32='0.00
1
$..I ;CO. OZ
SW-?0.C3 1
$4521. e-?.
Ww)?, k1O 1
$301.03
14
P.C.C. Walk Removal I ReDlace,,,-ient
125 S'F I
30.00
$752. 00 1
$6.00
$750.40 i
$8. r,-j5
$1,106.25 1
$5.00
21 5 . 00 1
-- $4.00
-- iicje-0. 00 1
$S. K 0
15
Payeiment Renoyal & Replacernert
40 SY 1
$6.00
$2-40. 00 1
3212. 0 0
$60Z.00 1
$48.1
$11920M 1
$321. Oe
$1, 200, CO 1
$4=_I. ea
$I on" 00 1
$3G. 0
L
Vt 440. Z
11 6
%.r p
C,:g-A.binatior, Curb & GutlV -r
43 !F 1
-�
$15. J-3
S-zP 0- -3. e-0 I
1p 10.0-3
4y"',0.0,0 1
$18.45
$7133. 00 1
0
$800. Z
A.
VZ I 514.00
3 1 0 3 1
$ 127. Z2
0 Z. 21 0
R-ci,ioval & Repl;ce;r�ent
I
-
17
Compacted Granular Trarch Packfill
200 CY 1
312-00
$29400.�O 1
$ 4115. Z 1
43, '0"1001. 03 It
**-24. H
$47 800.0;0 1
$210. Z- 3
$4, zzo. ea
1 $15.
$3, E-03. eZ i
$23. Z 0
$4, 6001. i0Z
71 76
(incl. Haulout Excess 'Viaterial)
18
Sz4 R.2storation
300 SY
$3. Z-0
J 902. ?-Z 1
$5. ea
$11500.OZ 1
$4.75
S 11425. 00 1
$8.0
$2 1
-
5' 0 O'A. 0 � 1
$3. 03
$632.0 l
13
Traffic and Erosion Control
I LS 1
$22?10. 20
$21L"O. 0.0 1
$503. e2i
$500. 010 1
$60113. to
$600. co I
v? 02`0.0'2
$2, ee-0. 20 1
$1, 5212. e.0
$1, t:2 0. e 0 1
00
$2, C V- L: a 6
-
t
'0
10' '1aver=;ib'e Meter "ead
I
$I I 8"zo. n
$I, Boo. n I
c I on - 0-0
$110 00. 0 ? 1
$:'1015. 1-2
$2,015.10 1
A
$
4 1 82r 0. e.Z,
I J
1 $218 e
$218 �.I-z i
i
31 01
21
Shut,-Dowm Connection to Exist Tee
I L5 1
"3 0 21 . e. 0
vd-�03. eo I
$ijulzaz
$1,500.00 1
$Mo. 40Z
$32%00 C2 1
$1, 802. ZZ
S118021.00
1 $8`0.000
,
$651,. 1e0 t
, 1
tint. 12L1
F J. V
Snut-Dcwn Connection inc. ("At-irr-Tee I LS 1
C'00. .00
$11 �j
$1, 11;010. 00 1
6d
$2, e.n. -2
Q
$2, u-0. 00 1
$11200. ?2
$1, 2012. 03 1
3 3
$51500. 00
$5, 5,10.0' Z
1 $2, 8E5. ZO
$29835-00 f
$3, u IZ. 3
S �j x: V t; I
-4 J
TOTAL I -21)
$37, *5163. A3
$481"30.03
$5551689. 35
$531423. '%00
$ 58, 4 7 2) - -Z 3
73 =,Z3
3,J
TOTPL + ALT)
$381160.00
$48, SZ-21. 00
$5G, 735:35
$63,1L20. Z-2
$60, cu,11,7. 012560,
s,
A =
Lino Plu.-6irig Co., Inc. C
= McCole Underground Cor.stru,,-,tion Co.
E =
Swallow Construction
Corporation
G=
Dir-eo Bros.
Inc.
600 E. TokEn
13546 Rockford Rd.
I S. 744 Meadow Lane
1704 S. Linden
Elk Grove Villaue, 111. 1E00107
La'>,e Pluff, 111. 60044
Lombard, 111.
60148
Park Ridge,
111. KOM
=
P-D Mqrhari-aj SErVi-ES CO. 0
= Prime Construction Irc.
F
J.3. Riemer,
Inc.
Z701 Commercial Pveriue, Suite
810 North Ave.
837 Winm)or Drive
v:4--i-look !111 6016?
Glen Ellyn, 111. 601-7
z
W. Duridee, 111.
60118
2391V
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR CERTAIN
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS KENSINGTON CENTER
IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, Opus Corporation has filed an application for variation
with respect to property commonly known as Kensington Center in the
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois (the "Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is described as f6llowsl
Lot 501 in Kensington Center - Phase Five, being a
Subdivision of part of the Northeast quarter of
Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the
Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois,
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek the following variation from
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, to allow the construction of a four story office building
to a height of fifty-five feet (55') in variation to the provisions
of Section 14.2204 of Article XXII which restrict the maximum height
of buildings to thirty feet (30'); and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation request
(designated as Case No. ZBA-8-V-85) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 7th day of February,
1985, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Prospect Herald on the 18th day of January, 1985; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect that such variation not be allowed, but the
President and Board of Trustees of said Village have given further
consideration to the variation request, and have examined the Site Plan
for the proposed four-story building which provides approximate set
backs of one hundred tt-ienty feet (1201) from Feehanville Drive, two
hundred fifty feet (2501) from the Wolf Road right-of-way, and three
hundred fifty feet (350') from the South Property line adjacent to
school property, with the nearest residence being located approxi-
mately one thousand feet (1,000') from the proposed office building
(a copy of which Site Plan is attached hereto and made a part of
this Ordinance), and this Board has determined that the variation
request as proposed herein satisfies the standards set forth in
Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, and
further finds that it would be in the best interest of the Village
to grant the request for variation.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the variation
requested with respect to Section 14.2204, of Article XXIII Chapter
4 of the village Code of mount Prospect, Illinois, to allow
construction of a four-story office building, pursuant to the
attached Site Plan, having a maximum building height which shall not
exceed fifty-five (551) feet.
ZBA 8-V-85 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all
*ther applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and Regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: %This Ordinance shall •be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1985.
AYES:
UMMM
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Village Engineer
DATE: February 22., 1985
SUBJECT:Bid Results for Weller Creek Improvements
Storm outfall Structures
Sealed bids for Weller Creek Improvements - Storm Outfall
Structures were publicly opened and read aloud at 10:00 a.m. on
February 20, 19854, by the Assistant Village Manager in the
Trustees' Room of the Village Hall.
The proposal requested unit prices for the repair of storm
outfall structures along Weller Creek from Elmhurst Avenue to
School Street. The summary bid tabulation follows and a complete
bid tabulation is attached:
If 1. Pederson Construction, Inc. $18r200.00
2. Prime Construction, Inc. $28,930.00
3. J.S. Riemer, Inc. $36,610.00
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $25,800.00
Accordingly, I recommend acceptance of the Pederson Construction,
Inc. bid of $18,200.00 for Weller Creek Improvements - Storm
Sewer Outfall Structures. Funding for this project is contained
in Budget Line Item 52-074-04-8706 Misc. Storm Sewer Repairs,
Page 144.
Chuck Bencic, Village Engineer Moe
I concur with the above recommendation.
&JIS
Herbert, Weeks, Director of Public works
CB/m.
Attachment
Ri
I F,-nnNf
CR F;-7it 11 f'vlfRal fEyT--lN`T5 biun
--I �. V c
- f�
UWALL STRUCTURE
lu H U-1
B
c
QUANTITY UNITI
UNIT
TOTAL I
UNIT
TOTAL 1, UNIT
- ------- -
TOTAL
-----
I
121v, 31Y I' Gabion
4
EA 1
--------------
$700.00
$22,800.00 1
$620.00
$29 480. 00 1
$780.00
$3,120.00 1
A V Gabdon
8
EA 1
$50CM
$4,000.00 1
$600.00
$4, 800.00 1
$760.00
$6, 240. @0 1
klR,
j
5
EA 1
$400.00
$21
$600. zo
$3, 000. 0a 1
X680.00
$3, 4 010. 00 1
I
EA 1
$750.00
$750.00 1
$1,800.00
$1,800.00 1
$1, 500.010
$1,500. 00 1
L- -tc-F Cared -n i or,
r Re'-ff-rced
I
[A I
$EOMO
$600M 1
$1, 500.00
$11500. 00 1
$1, 400.00
$1, 400.00 1
a! - i -f d fOrl
D-= T40
SY 1
$30.00
1 2M. 00 1
$ j
$100.00
$4,000.00 1
$58.00
$2, 322*0. 00 1
L E uJI; cy)
I
LS I
$Il200. M
$1,200.00 1
$8@0.0@
$800. @@ 1
$1 800. 00
$1,800. 03 1
k, -000.
-�,-y - j--!,
Asa r
I
LS 1
$300 . 00
SJOO.00 1
$1 00
$1,000.00 1
$1,590.00
$1,500.00 1
r 2 1, n
R-Pnval
10
EA 1
$20.00
$M.00 1
$20.
$200.00 1
$48.00
MOM 1
l,c-n P
I
LS 1
$2-11500.00
$22, 500.00 1
$2,000.00
$2,000.00 1
$318e
e -r - -n !-pilrolp & Replace)
I
LS 1
$500.00
$500.00 1
$600.00
$600.00 1
$1,100.00
$1,100-00 1
Sod R25tffaticln
750
SY 1
.0
$2.0
$1,500.00 1
$5.00
$3,750.00 1
$5.80
$4,350.0@ 1
PReEk, f, --'
,.--,( 1 T. 75 Y) I
d oration 'SST
LS
$2510. 00
$25 50.00 1
$1,000.00
$1,000-00 1
$29000-00
$21000.0@ 1
,n lf,Aat..ntrol
SEd,.ei,-C-O
I
LS 1
$400
$400.00 1
$2,000.00
$2,000.00 1
$3,600-00
$3,600-00 1
TOTAL
s 18, 200.00 00
$36t6l0.00
7 Y:c
A = Pederson Consturchey-il
9-3b, H.-D-Ir7les A`Venue
Dger fleld, Ill. 60015
945-3100
B = Prime Construction Inc.
810 North Ave.
Glen Ellyn, 111. 60137
790-3665
C az ,I. S. Ripmer, iric.
837 Wirtmcow Drive
W. Durdee, 111. 60118
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF PERSONAL
PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect owns a certain 12"
sewer main located in the vacated right-of-way formerly
known as Higgins Road, North of the interesection of
Oakton Street, Busse Road and Higgins Road, Elk Grove
Township, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect have determined that said force sewer main
is no longer necessary or needed for municipal purposes;
and
WHEREAS, said property, as shown on Exhibit A attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof, is presently located
within a buildable lot of record located in Elk Grove
Township, Illinois, and not within the corporate limits of
the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc, is the owner of the
subdivision on which the subject sewer main is located, has
submitted a proposal to purchase said sewer main from the
Village of Mount Prospect for $9,000; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect have determined it to be in the best
interest of the Village of Mount Prospect that said sewer
main to sold to La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. in accordance
with the written proposal dated February 19, 1985 from
La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY
ILLINOIS: I
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth above are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby approve and accept the
proposal submitted by La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. for the
purchase of certain Village owned property, namely a 12"
sewer main located north of the intersection of Oakton Street,
Busse Road and Higgins Road, as shown on Exhibit A attached
hereto. Said property shall be sold for a price of $9,000.
SECTION THREE: The Village President and Village Clerk are
hereby authorized and directed to execute any and all
documents on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect in order
to accomplish said sale of property, and the Village
Attorney is hereby authorized to undertake all necessary
commitment and document preparation requirements to conclude
the sale and conveyance of the subject property to La Quinta
Motor Inns, Inc.
SECTION FOUR.- This Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect upon its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in accordance with law.
AYES:
NAY S .-
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1 1985.
ATTEST: Village President
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8. SECTION 8.603
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECTr COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That, pursuant to the authority vested in the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
under Article VII of the 1970 Constitution of the State of
Illinois, paragraph D of Section 8.603 of Chapter 8, as
amended, is hereby further amended by deleting paragraph D
of Section 8.603 in its entirety and substituting therefor an
entirely new paragraph D; so that hereafter said paragraph D
of Section 8.603 of Chapter 8 shall be and read as follows:
D. Whenever a petition has been filed by a public
employee or group fo public employees or any
labor organization demonstrating that 30 percent
(30%) of the public employees in an appropriate unit:
1), wish to be represented by a labor organization
as exclusive representative, or
2) asserting that the labor organization which is
currently recognized as bargaining representative
is no longer the representative of the majority
of public employees in the unit;
the Village shall investigate such petition, and if
it has reasonable cause to believe that a question of
representation exists, shall provide for an
appropriate hearing upon due notice. Other interested
employee organizations may intervene in the proceedings
by so requesting, in writing, to the Village within
seven (7) days of posting the notice of hearing.
1. The Village shall decide, in each case, a unit
appropriate for the purpose of bargaining, based upon
some or all of the following factors: historical
pattern of recognition; community of interest
including employee skills and functions; degree of
functional integration; interchangeability and
contact among employees; common supervision, wages,
hours and other working conditions of the employees
involved; and such other factors traditionally
considered in similar proceedings. A single
bargaining unit may not include both supervisors
and non -supervisors.
2. In instances where more than one employee
organization claims a representional interest in a
unit, the Village shall determine the majority
representative of the public employees by conducting
a secret ballot election. After the unit determination
hearing, the Village shall issue its bargaining unit
determination and direction of election. The Village
shall submit to each labor organization a list of the
names of those employees who are determined by the
Village to be eligible to participate in the election.
When the Village has determined that a labor
organization has been fairly and freely chosen by a
majority of employees in an appropriate unit, such
organization shall be the exclusive represenatative.
If the Village determines that a majority of
employees in an appropriate unit has fairly and
freely chosen not to be represented by a labor
organization, it shall so certify.
3. This election process may be bypassed where
only one labor organization has claimed an interest
in the bargaining unit, the incumbent labor
organization, if any, signs a disclaimer of interest
in the outcome of the election, and the Village
chooses to volunarily recognize the petitioning
labor organization.
4. The Village shall not conduct an election in
any bargaining unit or any subdivision thereof
within which a valid election has been held in the
preceding 12 -month period. The Village shall
determine who is eligible to vote in an election
and may establish rules governing the conduct of the
election or conduct effecting the results of the
election. The Village shall include on a ballot in
a representation election a choice of "no
representation". A labor organization currently
representing the bargaining unit of employees shall
be placed on the ballot in any representation election,
unless said organization signs a disclaimer of
interest in the outcome of the election. In any
election where none of the choices on the ballot
receives a majority, a runoff election shall be
conducted between the two choices receiving the
largest number of valid votes cast in the election.
5. No election shall be directed by the Village in
any bargaining unit where there is in force a valid
collective bargaining agreement. The Village, however,
may process an election petition filed between 90
and 30 days prior to the expiration of the date of
the agreement. No collective bargaining agreement
bars an election upon the petition of persons not
parties thereto where more than three years have
elapsed since the effective date of the agreement.
6. No employee organization shall be -placed
on the ballot if such organization has encouraged
or participated in a strike of any of the employees
of the Village within five ( 5 ) years of the date of
its petition for recognition or if such organization
asserts the right to strike against any public
employer, or to conduct, assist, or partic,-'Lpate in,
any such strike;
7. Neither party shall make threats of any
nature to influence employee voting.
8. The Village shall not make promises of
promotions, pay raises, or other benefits to
influence an employee vote. However, this provision
shall in no way effectthe right of the Village to
implement any personnel program affecting all
Village employees.
9. Neither the employee organization seeking
- 2 -
to be represented nor the Village shall make mis-
statements of important facts, nor shall they incite
racial, religious, or union discrimination or other
prejudice by inflammatory appeals.
10. The Village may elect to cease or refuse to
recognize or to negotiate with any group and may
terminate any existing agreement with any such group,
association, or individual representing such groups
or associations where any of the above have peen
convicted of violating any federal laws, statutes of
the State of Illinois, or ordinances of the Village
of Mount Prospect, provided that the conviction of
any individual was related to his activities on
behalf of such group or association. if
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication
in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED tl)is day of 1985.
Village President
-
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
................................
o. 3�
a
N'
TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE 14ANAGER 0110
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COM11UNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
'All
SUBJECT: CONSULTING SERVICES FOR DOWNTOWN IIIPROVE14ENTS
PROSPECT AVENUE
DATE: FEBRUARY 28., 1985
The Community Development staff sent out requests for proposals
for engineering services and landscaping architecture for the
next phase of the downtown improvements. These improvements are
directed toward Prospect Avenue from Wille to Pine. The Public
Works Department, Engineering Division, has determined that they
do not have sufficient manpower to prepare the necessary plans
and specifications for this project. For this reason, we are
going to outside consulting firms. We have summarized the
proposals received from the consultants.
We request Village Board approval of the low proposals for both
landscaping architecture services and engineering services and
authorize execution of contracts. The services are eligible for
C.D.B.G. funding and adequate funds exist on Page 98 of the
1984-85 budget. Account No. 23-062-13-6016 has $15,000 budgeted
and the balance can be taken from Account No. 23-062-13-8951,
Firm Landscap"ing Engineering
Arch. Services Services
Brickman & Associates No Proposal
McFadzean & Everly No Proposal
Ado..
Planning Resources $ 5 ,460 .00
Baxter & Woodman $19,800.00
Marchris Engineering $15r6OO.00
Peter Olesen & Assoc. $10,550.84
THF :hg
IQ
Village of Mount&0 Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE AND BOARD OF TV.USTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 1, 1985
SUBJECT: FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
At the Village Board meeting of February 5, the Village Manager
was instructed to secure additional information from the Forest
River Fire Protection District and report to the Board at the
March 5 Village Board meeting. We were seeking information as to
the level of funding provided to the Village for fire protection
and ambulance service mandated by a 1971 Consent Decree. The
issue arose initially when the Finance Director was not provided
sufficient accounting background information regarding the
District's Tax Levy and expenses.
Subsequent investigation demonstrated that nearly 40% of the
District's expenses were related to administrative costs such as
salaries for the Trustees, attorney fees and audit expenses.
Since that last Village Board meeting, the 1,1anager has had three
or four conversations with Richard Rochester, attorney for the
District and the Manager has written to each of the District
Trustees individually seeking specific kinds of information about
meetings, minutes and expenses. The Village has received some
additional financial information indicating from the most recent
June 30, 1984 audit that the District has approximately $25,800
in liquid balances and that from the total revenue of 1984
($22p600) the Village has received $9,000 or roughly 40%, the
attorney $5,400 or approximately 24% and the Trustees indi-
vidually $750 or roughly 10% of the total revenue,
The Village Manager has reiterated through telephone conversa-
tions that the administrative expenses appear to exceed normal
expectations for a District with limited functions and con-
tractual services. Furthermore, the Village Manager has re-
quested that the cash surplus be given to the Village and that
the Trustees propose a Referendum for a tax rate increase in
order to approximate the cost for services to Mount Prospect
residents,
Because of various schedule conflicts, the District has not been
able to arrange a meeting until Saturday morning, March 2. At
this time, the Village Manager will visit the District offices,
examine available records and pursue the negotiations as outlined
above. Additional information will be provided to the Village
C)
Board on Tuesday, March 5.
NOW
TT R / -et-wr TVPDAMOV T RTTV 02W A D T)
FRIDAY SATURDAY
Coffee with 2
Elected Official
10:00 -Noon
Village Hall OPEN
9:00 - Noon
Limited Services
8 9
Village Hall OPEN
9:00 - Noon
Limited Services
15 U16
Village Hall OPEN
9:00 - Noon
Limited Services
E.S.D.A. 7:30 PM***
18
Board of Trustees 1 Plan Commission
C mras s i'
on20' Cable
e T Vi
-
Q3)
8:00 P?M.* 8:00 P.M. CU1TlSSiCn
7:30 P.M. Villagea
OPEN
9:00 - Noon
Limited Services
E.S.D.A. 7:30 PM***
U25
Committee of the Business U28 2 30
Whole 7.30 P.M.* District Develop.-
Zoning Board of
Appeals 8,00 Ply
a & ReDevelopment Coni, Village Hall OPEN
7:30 P.M.
9:00 -- Neon.
Limited Services
E.S.D.A. 7.30 PM***
SPECIAL NOTICE April 61 1985 All Saturdays s in A ril All meetings will be held in the Trustees' Room, 2nd floorw
p Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street, unless otherwise noted.
Coffee with Elected Village Hall OPEN * Board Roam, 2nd floor, 112 E. Northwest Highway
Officials 10:00 -Noon 9:00 — Noon ** Senior Citizen Center, SO S. Emerson Street
*** Lunch Room, Lower Level, Village Hall
TUESDAY
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
U4
Board of Trustees 5Plate
_ sio_
14K
7
Safety Commission8:00
P.M.*.
PQM.
7:30 P.M.
Blood Drawing
3:00 - 8:00 PM*
E.S.D.A 7:30 PM*
� �
Committee of the 1
1
14
r�
Whole 7:30 P.M,*
__
FRIDAY SATURDAY
Coffee with 2
Elected Official
10:00 -Noon
Village Hall OPEN
9:00 - Noon
Limited Services
8 9
Village Hall OPEN
9:00 - Noon
Limited Services
15 U16
Village Hall OPEN
9:00 - Noon
Limited Services
E.S.D.A. 7:30 PM***
18
Board of Trustees 1 Plan Commission
C mras s i'
on20' Cable
e T Vi
-
Q3)
8:00 P?M.* 8:00 P.M. CU1TlSSiCn
7:30 P.M. Villagea
OPEN
9:00 - Noon
Limited Services
E.S.D.A. 7:30 PM***
U25
Committee of the Business U28 2 30
Whole 7.30 P.M.* District Develop.-
Zoning Board of
Appeals 8,00 Ply
a & ReDevelopment Coni, Village Hall OPEN
7:30 P.M.
9:00 -- Neon.
Limited Services
E.S.D.A. 7.30 PM***
SPECIAL NOTICE April 61 1985 All Saturdays s in A ril All meetings will be held in the Trustees' Room, 2nd floorw
p Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street, unless otherwise noted.
Coffee with Elected Village Hall OPEN * Board Roam, 2nd floor, 112 E. Northwest Highway
Officials 10:00 -Noon 9:00 — Noon ** Senior Citizen Center, SO S. Emerson Street
*** Lunch Room, Lower Level, Village Hall
til!
MINUTES
COMMITTEE of THE WHOLE.
FEBRUARY 12, 1985
I* ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p►.m. Present at the
meeting were: Mayor Carolyn Krause; Trustees Ralph Arthur,
Leo Floros , Gerald .Farley►, Norma Murauskis, George Van Geem
and Theodore Wattenberg. Also present at the meeting were:
Village Manager Terrance Burghard, Human Services Coordina-
tor Nancy Morgan, Director of Community Development Kenneth
Fritz, Village Planner Steve Park, Director of Finance
David Jepson, Intern Michael S teklac , 'Village Clerk Carol
Fields and approximately 25 persons in the audience.
II. MINUTES
The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of
January 29, 1985 were accepted and filed.
III* CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
There being no citizens present at the meeting, desiring to
make any presentations before the Committee of the Whole,
the Mayor moved on to the next item of business.
I. TELEVISED 1985-1986 BUDGET HEARINGS
Mayor 'Krause informed the members present in the audience
and those on cable tv that this was the second Budget
Hearing being conducted by the Mayer ,and Beard of Trustees
and the second Hearing to be carried live on cable tele-
vision. The Mayor pointed out that the Budget is an
important element of municipal policy and that our expendi-
tures approach $23.6 million exclusive of the Library and
that all citizens should be familiar with how their local
tax funds are spent.
,,General Bud et Overview
Village Manager Terrance Burg,hard pointed out that the
proposed Budget is $23,585,000 which is a 5.7% increase over
last budget year. The Village, however, is able to manage
that budget increase by still keeping the Village's tax rate
lower than it was in 1976. The proposed tax rate for the
forthcoming budget year is $.94 per $100 of assessed
valuation and the tax rate for the Village in 1976 was $1.38
per 100 of equalized assessed valuation.
�' • • # r r r # • . IFa IF I IN
AN
I �
r r # r # r # ` ` r � • ` rt ` # 1
s
+w
r ..
s
ri # ` rt• "
` r i • 1i * i * �1 .. ` ••
#11 N` #rll r • ` i • X11 #
# • # .. a 11 # ` • . k .� .. • ..
s
NIP
a
.. • • 1 111 +*i ! AN • IN # 11
# • r "' "` "f •# !r• i 1 r rr it
41
• . r � a r r
OF I
r i a # #
-�► � # DIY, _ • .. u i
NO
i i 11 1 r ! . •� "`
IF
1 # #i111i • i • .• •
i i • # s i 11 r # • # # * # `
r i ` 1 # # # " # • "`
r • # #
The proposed Community Outreach Nursing Program will be an
expansion of our existing Nursing Program located at the
Senior Center. The Outreach Program will have the unique
quality of providing personal nursing care to homebound
residents of Mount Prospect who have no other service
opportunities or organizations that would fit their needs.
After Ms. Morgan's presentation, Trustee Farley inquired as
to the need for *increased Case Worker hours and suggested
that the Village look at an increased use of citizen
volunteers at the Senior Center who could assist residents
in filling out forms for Medicare, etc. After some further
general discussion, it was concluded to approve the budget
tentatively with the caveat that the administration is to
evaluate through the Senior Citizens' Advisory Council the
potential for better utilization of volunteer services.
Community. Development, De artment
Village Manager Burghard introduced the Director of Communi-
ty Development Kenneth Fritz and again pointed out that of
the $905,000 Community Development budget, only $100,000 is
generated from local tax revenue. These local revenue
sources go to support primarily personnel services for staff
who review plans for future developments and act as staff
liaison to the Plan Commission, the Zoning Board of Appeals
and the Downtown Business District Committee,
Mr. Fritz reviewed the scope of the proposed Program
pointing out some of the activities that have been very
successful over the past several years including the Facade
Improvement Program, the Single Family Home Rehabilitation
Program and the development of various recreational areas in
addition to improvements to the Central Business District
public right-of-ways. Mr. Fritz reviewed in some detail the
program for downtown improvements including some proposed
changes to the Railroad Station, the Multi -Family Housing
Rehabilitation Program which was recently adopted by the
Mayor and Board of Trustees and the continued recreational
area development at the south end of the community. Mr.
Fritz pointed out that the Village makes the improvements to
the Commonwealth Edisod right-of-way through contractual
services and then subsequently turns the improvements over
to the Mount Prospect Park District who then assumes annual
maintenance,
Im
•• +�1rlr * 11 * •1#
i • i • Ir! � i• • "• `
« i Iw i • • i i 1M « `
* � • 11 N • i • i i
«
i i Iw � • • 1 « `
i • i # * � r � � .. ..
� i i « i i * 11 • � • i ! �
• � � � i . 1 1i1 r
all
i * it 1 • i 11 « i « * i i • ♦ i
4w
f r 7 1 � * • w i � w � 7i ` # w `
Aw
�« * • � � i! ri � • i • � 1 i • r � r
s
i • I • ` r « i it i * '" r * � r � 1 1 • `
4r 4 Or
•. tl i i * IL wdo
* 11 i i •
qr
w
i r I • ! "` i "` i " i • i • 0 ! •• "" ••
r
V. ,MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager reported that the WATER AGENCY will be going
to New York at the end of February in order to secure bond
ratings for the pending Debt Issue of the Joint Action Water
Agency. It is the intent of the Agency to issue refunding-
final funding bonds sometime during the month of March when
the market appears most likely to grant us the lowest
interest rate, The remainder of the project remains on
schedule even though that schedule was adopted by the Agency
back in 1981,
VI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Trustee Wattenberg, thanked the administration for the recent
Litigation and Insurance Report and suggested that the
Village staff needs to develop a management letter in
conjunction with loss prevention indicating the number of
claims by suit and by number of employees.
V I I ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
at 9:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
TERRANCE L, BURGHARD
Village Manager
TLB /rcw
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, COM11UNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: CONSULTING SERVICES FOR DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS
PROSPECT AVENUE
DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1985
The Community Development staff sent out requests for proposals
for engineering services and landscaping architecture for the
next phase of the downtown improvements. These improvements are
directed toward Prospect. Avenue from Wille to Pine. The Public
Works Department, Engineering Division, has determined that they
do not have sufficient manpower to prepare the necessary plans
and specifications for this project. For this reason, we are
going to outside consulting firms. We have summarized the
proposals received from the consultants.
We request Village Board approval of the low proposals for both
landscaping architecture services and engineering services and
authorize execution of contracts. The services are eligible for
C.D.B.G. funding and adequate funds exist on Page 98 of the
1984-85 budget. Account No. 23-062-13-6016 has $15,000 budgeted
and the balance can be taken from Account No, 23-062-13-8951.
Firm Landscap*
L,ng, Engi,neerin,.g
,Arch. Services Services
Brickman & Associates
McFadzean & Everly
Planning Resources
Baxter & Woodman
Marchris Engineering
Peter Olesen & Assoc.
KHF:hg
No Proposal
No Proposal
$ 5 ,460.40
$19p800.00
$152600-00
$10x550.84
N
'Village of 'Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: village Manager -----------
FROM: Village Engineer
DATE: February 22, 1985
SUBJECT:Bid Results for Weller Creek Improvements
Storm Outfall Structures
Sealed bids for Weller Creek Improvements - Storm Outfall
Structures were publicly opened and read aloud at 10:00 a.m. cn
February 20, 19854, by the Assistant Village Manager in the
Trustees' Room of the Village Hall.
The proposal requested unit prices for the repair of storm
outfall structures along Weller Creek from Elmhurst Avenue to
School Street. The summary bid tabulation follows and a complete
bid tabulation is attached:
1. Pederson Construction, Inc. $18,200.00
2. Prime Construction, Inc. $28,930.00
3. J.S. Riemer, Inc. $36,610.00
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $25,,800.00
Accordingly, I recommend acceptance of the Pederson Construction,
Inc. bid of $18,200.00 for Weller Creek Improvements - Storm
Sewer Outfall Structures. Funding for this project is contained
in Budget Line Item 52-074-04-8706 Misc. Storm Sewer Repairs,
Page 144.
Chuck Bencic, Village Engineer
I concur with the above recommendation.
4 a I L pf, q '7
2%dl 13-
He'ribert, Week,s, Director of Public Works
CB/m
Attachment
n ITFAI ' STRU 7 i JRES
Lj
L L "A
-x 'Jil
A
= Pederson C,D:,,
.Stjjj,CtlCtr(, i". C.
936 Huh -,les Avenue
DEerfield, Ill. 60015
945-31OF
00
Prime Construction Inc.
810 North Ave.
Clem Ellyn, 111. 60137
790-3665
C = J. 5. Riever, inc.
837 Wintoctor Drive
W. Dur(dee, Ill. 60118
iY
B
c
17
1 EM DE'SCRIPTION
OUANTITY
UNITI
UNIT
TOTAL I
UNIT
TOTAL
f UNIT
1
TOTAL I
---------------------------
4
I
t EA 1
--------------
$700.00
1
$2' M.00 1
00
$2, 480.00 1
$7810. 00
$3,12-0.00 1
91 -"x 11 Gad ion
8
EA 1
1500.00
$4,000.0.0 1
$600.00
$4,800.00
1 $780.00
$6,20.00 1
7 � I -I --
b
5
EA I
WMO
$2 00030 1
$60030
$3, 000.00
I $680.00
$3,4010M I
0
1
EA 1
3750.00
$750.00 1
$1,800.00
$1, 800.00
1 $1,500.00
$1,500.00 1
? lE-i I c lalrud End Sec%,,.-,Ctrt
Rei r;f jrc-d
I
EA I
WOO. 00
$600.00 1
$11500.0@
$1,500.00
1 $1,400.00
$1,400.00 1
rectif
40
SY 1
$30.00
$1,20(b. 00 1
3100.00
$410@0.00
1 $58.00
$2,
: -Y)
5 6 D U
I
LSI
VI200. 00
$112@0.03
1 $800.00
3800.00
I sitam 00
$1,800. 00 1
I
LS 1
$300.00
Vq-0. 00
1 $1 000.00
$1,000.00
1 $1,500.00
$1,500.00 1
,env
10
EA 1
$20-00
$20 .00
1 $20.00
V-00. 00
1 $48.00
$480.00 1
I p T ron
A'Floe
I
LS 1
$2
L- 150- 0. @0
$2, 5q;0. 00
1 $2,000.00
$2,000.00
1 $3, BeQ. 00
$3,800.00 1
C
RepIce) a
I
LS 1
$500-03
$500.00
1 $EOO. M
$60MO
1 $1,100.00
$111V10.00 I
Tr
I S -;,e st or a -j
750
SY 1
$2.0.0
CIRO. 00
1 $5.00
$31750.00
1 35.80
-
$41 650.00 1
13 Seed lRectc-0-ation (E-STa 75 SY
I
LS 1
$250.00
$250.00
1 $1,000-00
$1,000.00
1 $2,000-00
$2,003.00 1
lr c5edirel'tation C--introl
I
LS 1
$400.00
$400.00
1 $2,000.00
$2,00-0-00
1 33, 600-00
$3, 1,00.00 1
TOTAL
318122*10. 00
328, 930.00
X36, b10.00
A
= Pederson C,D:,,
.Stjjj,CtlCtr(, i". C.
936 Huh -,les Avenue
DEerfield, Ill. 60015
945-31OF
00
Prime Construction Inc.
810 North Ave.
Clem Ellyn, 111. 60137
790-3665
C = J. 5. Riever, inc.
837 Wintoctor Drive
W. Dur(dee, Ill. 60118
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
uzj 14 Am,
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1985
SUBJECT: ABANDONMENT OF VILLAGE PROPERTY
Attached is a memorandum from the Director of Public Works, a
letter from La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., and a letter from Mr.
Weeks. These documents relate to a proposal that the staff has
been evaluating since late last year.
Years ago, the Village installed a sewer line, parts of which
were outside our Corporate limits. The sewer line was installed
along the State right-of-way. Subsequently, because of improve-
ments to the MSD trunks, the Village was able to abandon the
line. Additionally, with roadway revisions, the State of
Illinois realigned parts of Oakton and Busse Roads and apparently
sold off their surplus property. The Village's sewer line, not
currently in use, lies therefore not only outside our Corporate
limits but no longer within State right-of-way.
La Quinta Motor Inns has or is purchasing property which contains
the Village sewer line and through negotiations with our staff,
we have secured a $9,000 offer from La Quinta for permanent
abandonment of the sewer line and property.
Since the Village has no use for the sewer line, we recommend
that the Board accept the offer and enact an Ordinance disposing
of this property as abandoned.
TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
TLB/ rcw
attachment
Village of Mount Prospect,
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
T0: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: February 20, 1985
SUBJ: Cash Settlement on Abandonment
of Village Property
Several years ago a developer wanted to construct an apartment
complex and shopping center at the intersection of Oakton and Route
83. At that time the Village did not have sewer service available
on-site and to allow the developer to construct the project, we
installed a sewage lift station and force -main from 83, along
Oakton to Busse Rd.
Several years later the MSD installed a lateral sewer trunk line
adjacent to the property at 83 and Oakton and we were able to
abandon our lift station and force -main and connect directly to the
MSD sewer. In the meantime the State of Illinois made some inter-
section improvements and modifications at the corner of Oakton,
Busse and RoOte 83 and our old easement for this abandoned sewer
force -main was no longer on public right-of-way.
The State has since sold off this parcel of property at the
intersection of Busse and Oakton and the developer, La Quinta Motor
Inns, Inc. wants us to abandon our unused 1211 sewer force -main
which goes through their property now. Years ago one of the
thoughts was that once the sewage lift station was abandoned we
would consider the possibility of cleaning the force -main and using
it for a water main. This may be very difficult to accomplish to
make it sterile and we really don't know the kind of shape it is
in, especially at the Higgins Creek crossing.
As an alternative to LaQuinta Motor Inns, Inc. I proposed two
options so they could develop their property:
1. Relocate our 1211 main around their property on public right-
of-way or,
20 Make a payment of $9,000 to the Village for abandonment of the
main within their property.
This one time fee would be approximately 50'/' of the cost of a
future interconnection North of the Tollway. I would recommend the
Village accept the $9,000 and abandon that section of the unused
force -main.
HLW/eh
Attachments
Q UIntG
�o�
MOTOR INNS, INC.
ID9536N
FEDERAL EXPRESS AIRBILL NO. 609335580
February 19, 1985
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director Public Works
Village of mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Re: La Motor Inn No. 634
Elk Grove Village, IL.
Property at Busse Road and Oakton Street
Dear Mr. Weeks:
Pursuant to our conversation of February 15, 1985, wherein I advised
you that in accordance with your letter dated January 9, 1985 La
Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. has chosen to exercise the second option,
i.e., payment of $9,000.00 to the Village of Mount Prospect which is
approximately 50% of the cost of the interconnection north of the
tollway for the 12 inch forcemain located in the Old Higgins Road
right of way near the intersection of Busse Road and Oakton Street.
It is also my understanding that you would present this proposal to
the Village Board and advise us of approval as soon as possible. If
you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
LA QUINTA MOTOR INNS, INC.
Deborah A. Wear -Rios
Legal Assistant
cc: Alan Tallis
Marilyn Boldrick
Maxine Kersey
Betty Parr
Office of the General Counsel
La Quinta Plaza * R 0. Box 32064 # San Antonio, Texas 78216 a 512-366-6000
January 9, 1984
La Quinta Motor Inns Inc.
P.O. Box 32783
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Attention: Mr. Wayne Huddleston
Re: Property at Busse Road and Oakton Street
Gentlemen:
The Village of Mount Prospect has been contacted for information
concerning the 12" forcemain located in the Old Higgins Road Right-
of-way near the intersection of Busse Road and Oakton Street, Cook County,
Illinois.
This 12" forcemain is no longer in use, however the pipe has been
plugged at both ends and was in the Village plans to be rehabilitated
and put back in use as a part of the Village Water Main system.
Abandoning the section of main across the property in question would
require the village to interconnect the main north of the tollway. Therefore
the Village would propose two options. One, require the 12" main
be relocated around the property in question or second, require a
payment of $9,000 to the Village which is approximately 50% of the cost
of an interconnection north of the Tollway.
Yours very truly,
"*tYon
CARS LYN H KRAUSE
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
CRALD L FARLEY
LEO FLOROS
NORMA T MURAUSKIS
GEORGE R VAN GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
TERRANCE L. BURGHARD
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
January 9, 1984
La Quinta Motor Inns Inc.
P.O. Box 32783
San Antonio, Texas 78216
Attention: Mr. Wayne Huddleston
Re: Property at Busse Road and Oakton Street
Gentlemen:
The Village of Mount Prospect has been contacted for information
concerning the 12" forcemain located in the Old Higgins Road Right-
of-way near the intersection of Busse Road and Oakton Street, Cook County,
Illinois.
This 12" forcemain is no longer in use, however the pipe has been
plugged at both ends and was in the Village plans to be rehabilitated
and put back in use as a part of the Village Water Main system.
Abandoning the section of main across the property in question would
require the village to interconnect the main north of the tollway. Therefore
the Village would propose two options. One, require the 12" main
be relocated around the property in question or second, require a
payment of $9,000 to the Village which is approximately 50% of the cost
of an interconnection north of the Tollway.
Yours very truly,