Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1720_001MAYOR .. 9Ih� c,,yV,7r, Mwdmwiv, ,,, „ yj1Pf e[i1 Y kx pl "tV ` CAROL YN H, KRAUSE " ; oAl r TRUSTEES A v RALPHWARTHUR GERALD L. F,ARL_EY LEO FLOROS NORMA J. M URAUSKIS GEORGE R. VAN DEEM THEODORE J. WA►TTEN®ERG V 11, ag e of o , , I, A P''r a,,,9a c VILLAGE MANAGER TERRANCE L. BURGHARD 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 � Phone 312 392 ,6000 BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Regular M`ar r Meet in Wednesday, February 27 1985 2nd Floor, Village Hall 7:30 P*Ma CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL OLD BUSINESS A ,v review of facade improvement application for., 1. Total Design Concept for 2 W. Busse/34 S. Main Street IV* NEW BUSINESS A* Review of facade improvement application for 1 Aldi Food Store, etc,, 100-,106 West Northwest Highway 411A*11N.UT,E'-S 0 0 �� 1411 of 01 XTA of 2bruary 13, 1985 TO ORDER .......... A special meeting of the Mount Prospect Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission was held on Wednesday, February 13, 1985. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Predovich. ROLL CALL Members of the Commission present: Jack McLean', David Levene, Bart Kelj'l'k, Joseph Janisch and Chairman Hal Predovich. Also present were Ed McAuliff, Harold McAuliff, Lan Riochart, Lockwood Martling, Kenneth Fritz and Michael Simso NEW BUSINESS 2 W. Busse Ave./34 S. Main Street Mr. Fri z exp aine( t e two c616�F' render ings, and that the Commiss ion had approved the second floor window treatment during their last meeting, He 0 added' since the last meeting, staff has met with two of the tenants of the building, Danneo's and Hot Dogs Plus, Danneo's has no real problems with the design. They would like to have a sign on the Busse Avenue side saying Ice Cream Parlor, Signs will meet Sign Code, 0 0 1$ The Hot Dogs Plus sign 'is about 6'x 4' and 'is a legal nonconforming sign, Hot Dogs Plus is having a Sign man visit next week to discuss siognage. Mr. Fritz reported that the owners of the building want all signs to meet the sign code and would like a good quality si*gn,, Mr. Kelj'l'k said he sym- pathized with the merchant's concern for having a highly visible sign, He said the location of the business makes signage difficult, Mr. Fritz stated the North sign painted on the building would be removed and that the Village's share of the facade 'improvement for the entire building would be up to $15,000.00. Mr. McLean moved that approval of the design for 2 West Busse Ave./34 South Main Street be deferred until the 'intention of Hot Dogs Plus are finalized. The motion was seconded by Mr. Levene,, Those 'in favor of the motion were Mes `k and McLean. 1 srs. Levene Kel3l gaePreov'ch nd Mr. P A*nst wre Chairman d I a Jani'sch, The motion passed, 0 Facade Block Studies M,re THtz rec-ounte('the Commission's request for facade block studies i -n late 1984 and the events leading up to that request. He then introduced Mr. Lockwood Martling, the Facade Program's Architect, Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission Minutes February 13, 1985 10 Page Two Mr. Mar ling presented four block studies for the, Commission's consi - 13 der ion. Three were on the South side of Prospect Ave., between Main anu Pine Streets. The other was on the North side of Busse Ave* from Main St. to Wille St. Following 11r,, Martling's presentation, Mr. Janisch commended Mr. Martling and Planning Resources Inc* for the sensitive design that retained the , downtown 's character. other comments by the Commission members were equally flattering, 11r Fritz said the staff will use the block studies as examples of good block design when owners or merchants come in for facade application, Announcement t 3. one d that Mr. Cotten and other Village representatives attended a program at Homewood, Illinois on Saturday, January 26, regarding Tax Increment Financing. The program was very 'informative, Approximately 18 people from Mount Prospect participated in the program. ADJOURNMENT ffi�-meeting, was adjourned at 9.-40 p.m# a e` s; Assistant Planner I Roll all MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM by Village Manager Terrance Burghard. Commissioners present were Richard Bachhuber, Paul Davies, Tom Pekras and Ann Smilanic. Also pres,ent were: Trustee George Van Geem, Village Manager Terrance Burghard, Finance D.irector David Jepson, Public Works Di,rector Herb Weeks, Deputy Public Works Director Glen Andler, and Village Engineer Chuck Bencic, Commissi,oner William Holloway arrived at,,8:15 PM. 'Appointment of Secretary,, Commissioner Richard Bachhuber was appointed Secretary Pro -Tem for the meeting *f February 20, 19850 M I I I Videotape, of Budget A videotape of selected segments of the televised budget hearings of January 29, 1985 and February 12, 1985 was shown to the Commissioners. The tape included ... portions of each presentation at those meetings and was approximately 8 minutes 0 in length. IV 1985/86 Budget Review,,. Works Village Manager Burghard stated that the Department of Public Works is respon- 1 1 1 1 We for the Maintenance f Publ*c Fac*l*ties and the Water and Sewer Ut*lity si portions of the 85/86 budget. The total of these two areas is some $10.7 million and makes up 45% of the total Village budget. Two items worthy of special mention are: I. The contract for refuse pick-up and disposal of $1,185,500 6 # fm has been . included as a new program 1 n the Street Di vi sion, The new program, Sol.id Waste Disposal,, formerly had been a part of the Health, Department budget. The Water and Sewer Utty budget includes $3,052,000 for 0 Lake Michigan Water Acquisition. The budget amount includes $1,225,000 for purchase of water and operating charges and $1,827,000 for fixed costs. Mr. Burghard ment'ioned that although the total number of full-time Village employees will remain the same as last year, two new positions are being recommended for POblic Works. A new position of Administrative Aide and an additional maintenance worker are being recommended. The Administrative Aide w *11 assist the Director and Deputy Director in contract administration, deve- loping bid specifications, recordingand reporting systems, and purchasing, 2 Public Works Director Herb Weeks then reviewed each program and presented slides to illustrate various types of equipment and improvement projects in the 85/86 budget. He stated that there are ten vehicles included in the budget: two dump truck ' s. five pick-up trucks, one end loader and two pool cars. All except one'pick-up truck are replacements. Other noteworthy capital expenditures included in the budget are-, 1)window Teplacement i'n the Public - Safety Building; 2) rebuilding a street sweeper; 3) purchasing a portable asphalt heater,; 4) replacing snow plows; 5) repll�cing a metal lathe; and beautification projects. AddonaTly, a second joint home building project w ith School District 214 has been included. i 0 Following are some of the other items mentioned by Mr. Weeks, Street Division - There are 14 programs in the :)tr eet Division �judget totaling $2,994,190. SolidWaste dis.posal makesup 40% of the overall total. Other programs include Snow Removal, Leaf Removal, Street Mai.ntenance, Maintenance of Public Buildingsi Vehicle Maintenance and Forestry. The total 1985/86 budget is $198,500 greater than the 1984/85 budget (adjusted for the trans�fer �of refuse disposal). It was pointed out that approximately $30,000 of this increase is due to an accounting change in�the method of recording theshared- cost tree program. Water and Sower Division, - The acquisitilon of Lake Michigan water IMccounts for 56%,of the total Water and Sewer budget. Mr. Weeks pointed out that system maintenance(Wells,and Distribution System) totals $985,845 and that as the distrtbution system ages, these 0 0^# costs will become even more signlTlcant in the future. Additionally, the 85/86 budget provides for abandoning Wells 2 and 3; painting the tank at Well 16 and continuing the meter replacement program. Itis expected that electrical energy costs will drop from an estimated $800,000 in 84/85 to..$400,000 in 85/86 due to the acquisition of Lake water, Parking Division - There are no significant changes in the Parking Division for 85/86, 11 Engineering Division - The proposed Engineering budget of $2,404.76 is primarily made up of capital improvement projects including: Completion of Sewer Rehab Project $7901000 0 Street Resurfaci ng 65 01 Q00 Other Street Projects 343,100 Sidewalk Construction 91,1930 V V I 3 Mr. Weeks stated that a resurfacing i 1984/85. Additionally, Commons, Kensington w 6 included in the budget, total of 6.51 miles of for 1985/86 compared to traffic signals at Rt, Wheeling, and Golf and street 4,16 miles in 83 and Huntington Me,ier Road are 0 After Mr. Weeks completed his presentation,, a number of questions were raised by Commissioners and there was in-depth discussion •of the various programs. A summary of the discussion is contained' in Mr. Bachhuber's minutes which are attached. Additionally, it was pointed out that a number of items had been included in the original budget requests but were not included in the proposed budget. These included draperies and carpeti, ng in the Village Hall; the heating ,znd air-conditioning system in the Village Hall; and chair replacement in the Public Safety Building. 11 A Finance Director Jepson presented information on the Debt Service and Pension sections of the 85/Wbuii` t. Debt Service totals $914,660 in the 85/86 budget representing 3.8% of the total budget. The debt Included consists�of $551,,335 for general obligation debt and $363,345 for special service area debt. debt covers principal and interes for the 1973 Flood Control and Sewer Rehab bonds, the 1974 Municipal Building r Library bond issue and for computer aided dispatch equipment purchased in 1984. The average interest rate for all5.6%.. letDebt of the Village (total principal less ava.ilable cash) is $3,001,000. This can be expressed at $57 per capita or 0.65% of E. A. V. The median per cpiaa, ^ta debt of other municipaes of 00 - 100,00,0 population i's $135. Thesz figures indicate that the Vl*",llaqe is in an excellent debt poson. %OF Penion benefits included in the 1985/86 budget total $2,321,225 or 11.4% of the total budget. Due to reduced requirements in the Police and Fire Pension Funds, thi's amount is $129,475 less than the 84/85 budget. Independent actuarial studies have determined that the Police Pension Fund has achieved a 99.7% level of funding and the Fire Pension Fund is funded at 179.6%. Because of the level of funding, no Village'contribution to the Fire Pension Fund i's included in the 1985/86 budget, All employees, other than swornPolice and Fire personnel, working 1,000 hours or more are covered by the Illino,is Municipal Retirement Fund. Additionally, all employees other than sworn Police and Fire personnel are covered by Social Security. There be* ing no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:45 PM* Nespectfully Submitted, lavid C, Jepson Finance Director :1 Ij J.":-1 �. 'I No Vio .. I'lo., ki 1:' 40. - . lool [;of -40' ..4 "ON F:, p"I t 1. Y"wrts"x.w1 No I:* 1101) JTI 1. 4", ol"', I'"' I Ito." 1:3 1_1 - I.- - - j. Noo we .0 No, I (to too to No 0 wN "wt 0 1.... lot I: I tato .:3 1.4 No #1 R. to 11 : -9 lWil 4 1 1Z, k: I`- *ww l., I 40: " -0 ... 'I I I Y. 04, 1, t Plot 11 1 1 :1 1*"o 111, 1. Ili I 1 1. , , : , I I., No 0010 '. . - 17.4 :".A ro 1,"l I-, i VON No .P,o too j. too "A wit -1 .4 000 to, 4" 0 IZ.- A "ON 0" to pok, F '10) If lot , P..-- D j. I ININ Ioo� -I--, of to, -t ... Ol. -00* poo to e r% F1 in :-A T rV a ri 1, 1 Es on co 0" e too c.. It ww 0 Ij wxY x WN YF YY A* I'll ol"I ANN*Www to ..0, 'Not .00 W, :,W. -1. ::o No to 0 No No Vol ION* j. 1"I wwN ON. to .0, No Jo 0 wxt III') Oil 1. #":. 11:01 'I'll xxY Mi* 0 ON 0. sk ... C" * 0 1-oll co (g) 'I'll I. I000- ito. 1-,-1 e.% j. -I NNI If" INONO I-1.1 .-I loo Y www Y x4 I. I of" loot I. -I eww I- to .. to ft" 4. ... *11 Ili** to rl,* I"*1 I#.,. a No # 0 Z to z'". p V oloo, f, 1'0 1 Vot 0, 00#0 ON ItrtY NppF No No. 4 tgoo# I.." o 1.,% 4., Not 1 0 I - f. j. .1 No to 40, 0,00 to .1 ITI L.) J. No ..4 .. _: IJ I I) "'o. 1.1.11"" t". �o ."I. :,". k: r-, J 4 11 ON IryU to1 R N. 4, Not lot 0, 0i 11 004 IOOV 17:4, J"I F . I4xw M* j j �Ao :,0. It"' F% 1: '.. ow. Not to too t rvY (U'No to to 0#4 to "o to loo, .:-I .A 4 01 ON I I I.: No ')"I ',No. fit 1�­l FW P6 00 A ..6 to J. 1.4 to VA 0 0.0 1 it 01 0 I No No IN No NO *1 No . . C., I to .1 .. Not .0 NVO to -I I I I I J. -I-'I "Ito. I.,% I" 1"'I :.I. T) to-' 1"o, -.j 1: No 11p�I 1kA:p 'ON. 4 of No -I. f y -I 1- MM p "'1 t". b .I. � 1, IN.. No No Wo w to afta4w o I... Val 1-1 C.'' 1*0AA"N on 1z. W, .. 1"" 1") ITI fill t, :o. I-- j 0%0* too No to MN two - - i l000l ;.11:0 10 Vol i 1.04 too .4. 1. :N 0 oFh awnI".1 C:1 Ill IN 'T It'll Not it. o a t 0 1 44 1 4 1.... t 1#4 1:. In ...I Not N d Jo ON. I I ofoo, tN NM I. m to 44 Yr p oll. -1 to- "I "I"I It'll -I I,00 of*' 1:4., _. . *. 'It. .. I j 4- 1.... . "I wYkw loo., I... I 0 . . :. 1. 04, No I 1-1 I 1 to 4", 1.-1. ...) I 1�"w arra....axe �MwX FFF 1-1 "-:1, to .I prep it 00 t*'01 I-"- " I t ..:I F Vof 0 1 10 f.0 to . :.-, -I. I.- A' Na I*. . i 1. . 1.4, pit. I.w wk :rw 'A -�, J..'I 1.4.1 1"'1 ... too 0.4 A* W 0 Jo Not w# Not $-- - U4 ..%I. 1' 1".. pax YM 1.4 :I- f to paNp All pp "No. A to 4 ww It. (III I:"I Io"t I", j. If -1 .01. to y-, I— I; - -- �t .00 1"- 1 `14 f. so,') INN. I--] It,% I.--. 1-tol 1.1.1 t. I—. I- J. Wo .4 - N I No., 0. 4 V.0 it" 0, wpppM No 0 040 p1 1111 �A{pl�wtoo rI 0. .. ... .. , 0- Ypp X114 0" It III I - r ': lot I., 1. 0 1 *0 lot, Not Jo o a t 0 1 44 1 4 1.... t 1#4 1:. In ...I Not iw 01 to of** of, A "No 040It" 1-#� IV I"- No of loo. 1I. Not , r. No fit I - to I IZ. -..I to I I M. N 's 0: -0 too. to .0. 1"', to 11., 1 I'l 40 too to�MI 0. "N Noto 1 .4 --I s-, lo, .44 Pit. . .0 Iow- No I... 0 'I'l * I. -ON -0 to A, .0 00 of -4 4011 F No It. (III I:"I Io"t I", j. If -1 .01. to y-, I— I; - -- �t .00 1"- 1 `14 f. so,') INN. I--] It,% I.--. 1-tol 1.1.1 t. I—. I- J. Wo .4 - N I No., 0. 4 V.0 it" 0, wpppM No 0 040 p1 1111 �A{pl�wtoo rI It VIN .: - I - .1 c I - I -VNI (1.- 'd OWN. :.NA. +M. ol -"A C4 I to too No r% I: [.,I I."I � o t1l, � .0 VON No. it. 4p"to 4 IV0 No No #to #". A wanA lot ptY lookIMw I N, ID "I-1 Not wYiw R I to'* 3. 1 F t Fu to of IF, Iwwww J. .. k.Mw�r.�tMw .M axbwM*to .00 w�p J, ... . as V`I Not, 4 *1 Ito AMI N4 "1 -1 "No M. N 's No to to NY 44 saw I Yy to IYI IN. rtYap ON `I 'I'll :13. 't No ot 41 '40 It* 1. _1. wo I., o'. .. .... .. NO: ),.:I .�, (A Nowtr t ,Aa ata o' N� .01 Z, to "t, I.N.. ..pp. Y, y. 4, WK 01;reI R 64, No % PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PERSONAL SERVICES COMBINED POSITIONS 1983 - 84 19'84 85, 1984 - 85 '1905 ww 66 11984 - 85 1985 - 86 Actual Bu,q2,,.et,, Estimate Bu Full Time P.W. Director 1 1 $42pO86 $41,700 $45,000 $45 ,000 P.W. Deputy Director 1 1 34t532 33,862 36,1880 37t250 Superintendents 3 3 91�387 91tOO5 97,155 99,750 Admin. Aide 1 24pO8O Secretaries 3 3 51,175 48,794 53,750 53,750 Water Engineer 1 1 21,322 20t457 15t375 21,840 Foreman 6 6 135,966 138t318 162,920 169t890 Custodians 2 1 35,,274 30,478 25,590 19,365 Mechanics 5 5 1121438 116, 379 1159 140 11" 605 Electricians 2 2 6p554 45 018446t190 48t875 Mai nt. Personnel 29 31 629v291 590t838 604t245 660,830 Salary Adjustments 1,80038tOOO 5 500 1 Sub Total $11161 t8 5 $71p194,895 $1,202,245 0 $1p305p655 Part Time Partt3 Attendent, 1 1 101,285 111894 10X660 110t660 Mechanic 95 1X515 61500 6t5OO 6,76n Body Man 5 5 11637 6,1760 6,760 6,768 Student Mechanic 8 1 71,070 101,812 7t460 10,1820 Custndian 3t521 Seasonal Maintenance 6. 3 6*3 47,693 .52,BCI55tO1O 54,725 Other C c m sat "ions Longevity 16t4O8 21,000 18,, no 2007018 Overtime 186,268 109t6OO 115,938 124,000 Sick Leave Bene. 4, 88641800 4,,t8OO 51300 Totals 62*1 64*3 $1,359,500 $1,418t861 $19428,173 $1,545,380 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STAFFING REPORT HISTORY Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Proposed Position moomw 1980 - 81 1981 - 82 1982 - 83 1983 - 84 1984 - 85 1985 - 86 Full Time Director Deputy Director 1 1 Superintendents 3 3 3 3 3 3 Administrative Aide **# WX0 -No 1 Secretaries 3 3 3 3 3 3 Foremen 5 5 5 5 6 6 Custodians 5 5 4 3 2 1 Electricians "M WW aw 2 2 2 Mechanics 5 5 5 5 5 5 Water Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 Maintenance Person 31 31 31 29 29 31 Sub Total 55 55 53 53 55 Part Time Meter Repair/Collect *50) *5(1) *5(1) *5(1) *50) 65(1) Parts Attendant *50) *5(1) *50) o5(1) *50) .50) Mechanics 1*01 14*1 4mo, *50) *50' Body Man *50) *5(1) *50 Student Mechanic .4(1) e4(1) *40) *4(1) *40) *5(1 , Custodian *50) Seasonal Maint #,,nance 5*0(20) 5*5(22) 6 .3(25 6*3(25) 6 J(25)' Totals 61*4 61*9 60o 61*7 61e7 63*8 E,ngineerin,q ,.vision Full Time Village Engineer Project Engineer 1 2 2 2 2 2 Traffic Engineer 1 WAS wwo Traffic Technician 1 1 1 1 1 Engineering Asst. 3 2 2 1 1 1 Secretary 1 1 1 1 Part Time Draf tsman/Inspector *40) *4(1) .4(1) .4(1) s4(1) *4(1) Seasonal Draftsman e4(1) *40) *4(1) .8(2) *8(2) e8(2). Tot ala 7*8 1,08 7*8 7*2 7.2 1*2 Positions expressed as full-time equivalents with the number of part- time and seasonal positionc.- in brackets, s o JW MON-vow i154,fR5 \\� \ \\\ 4514- I 7 MINUT& 2 THE REGULAR MEETING OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER The regular meetiong of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Harold Ross at 8.:00 P,M, at the 0 Village Hall, 100 S, Emer.son Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois, ROLL CALL Present upon roll call Harold Ross, Chairman Donald Weibel, Secretary Frank Boege Tom Borrelli Lynn Kloster Tom McGovern Louis Velasco AbsentS None Also Present.. Steve Park, Village Planner and Mike Sims, Assistant Village Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Q Lynn Koster's motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of January 16, 1985 was seconded by Tom McGovern, All members voted Aye and Chairman Ross declared the minutes approved. Wto" COMMITTEE REPORTS None. TRANSPORTATION AND CENSUS ISSUES After a brief discussion the' Commission concluded that a lack of direction necessitated tabling these issues pending development or receipt of further 'information or guicance from the Village Board. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT HEARING Recommendations for Application of Fiscal Year 1985/86 Funds. Chairman Ross continued the Public Hearing begun at the January 16, 1985 Plan Commission meeting. Steve Park Distributed copies of a summary of all proposals received relative to prolects to be considered for fiscal year 1985/86 funding and a summary of the programs funded from 1978 to May, 1985r along with the Village staff recommendations for pro ects to be funded 'in fiscal year 1985/86, Frank Boege 3 1 reminded the Commission that this might be the last year that CDBG Funds would be available and program decisions should be ,given unusually judicious consiaeration, Steve Park stated that the fiscal year 1985/86 allocation of nearly $310r000 represented a 10% reduction in funaing, Mike Sims then presented a review of eleven proposals that had been received from all sources for f iscal year 1985/86. While M Plan Commissic nutes February 20, Page 2 of 2 0 several of the proposals seemed meritorious, he emphalzed -that, those pertaining to the V I'llage F 'Ire Department were inelig ible. The remaining proposals had been discussed at the Plan Commission Publ i'c Hearing on January 16, 1985. Comm issioners, questions were answered and Steve Park cont inued the presentat ion wi th an 1' tem by 'Item review of past proDects completed, continuing programs and those newly proposed for fi'scal year 1985/86. Louis Velasco, noted the special 3ob grant funds that had been used in 1983 to make improvements at Village Fire Station #2, He stated that the Plan Commission should have been advised of the proposed use of these funds before rather than after the fact. 11 oil op 01 40 W W W do IMM. MIA AMA oil All AMK 0 AMA AMA AMM AMh Aft A% AMG Im d"W MAr IM W W W WO W +MM Mir MM Aow i''Iff! mv AMA AMM AMr AMM AMI, W 0 4ft A& 0 W AM AM AMA AMA Aft oft is Chairman Ross requested a vote on the issueW Frank BoAMM, elsi motio to deny fund for the park was seconded by Tom Borrellil The Commission then voted 5-2 against the motion and Chairman Ross declared that 'it failed. D 0 0 iscussion of the remaining projects wMM, lAMM tAMA d. Frank Boege moved that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the program proposed by the Community Development Department, Tom Borrelli* seconded the motion and the Comm'sis a 1 ion voted 7-0 'in favor, 10 0 11 & Chairman Ross declared the motion carried and ad3ournea the Public Hearing. OLD BUSINESS Chairman Ross stated that the memory of recently deceased Plan Commissioner Marie Caylor would be commemurated with Masses to be said at her Parish Church'in the name of the Plan Commission. ADJOURNMENT No further business was brought to the Commissions attention and 05 PM *, Chairman Ross adjourned the meeting at 10 0 0 j Ponald Weibel, Secretary "F COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 29, 1985 The meeting was called to order at 7:32,p.m. Present at th meeting were, Mayor Carolyn Krause- Trustees Ralph Arthur Leo Floros Norma Murauski' s George Van Geem and Theodor Wattenberg. Absent from the meeting was Trustee Geral Farley. Also present •at the meeting were: Village Manage Terrance Burghard, Assistant to Village Manager Michae Janonis, Director of Finance David Jepson, Comptrollei Richard Jesse, Village Clerk Carol Fields and one perso from the print media. IIe MINUTES The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of January 22, 1985 were accepted and f I'led, IIIs CITIZENS TO BE HEARD There 'being no citizens present at the meeting desiring to make any presentations before the Committee of the Whole., the Mayormoved oma. fico the next item of business. 011 IVe ''TELEVISED 1985-1985 BUDGET HEARINGS �l Village Manager Terrance Burghard gave a general Budget overview of the proposed1985-1986 Village of Mount Prospect Budget. Mr. Burg,hard stated that the 1985-1986 Budget amounted to some $23.7 million, Mr. Burghard stated that in a the V*llage remains strong financial position maintain ing a stable tax rate, while at the same time decreasing its debt service, containing employment 'increases and retaining surricient Fund balances to meet the Village's operating and reserveneeds * The $23.7 million figure for the 1985-1986 Budget represents an 'increase of approximately 5.7% over last fiscal year when projected expenses amounted to some $,22.4 million. The major additions to the Budget which account for most of this increase include. - Lake Water Operations $2o000o000 Insurance Expenses 200�000 Accelerated Paving Program 150j000 Commercial and Multi -Family Rehabilitation 106tOOO Village/District 214 Home Construct ion 71,000 There are reductions elsewhere 'in the Budget to offset 0 ,,,partially some of these increases, A�W ft a ft .6iw off sk so$ of I 1W A Ab 0 4 4W AW 16 W Ab AL AL Al 4W 41b W W Al� ft Ak 00 Ak All dO 60 4W 40 40 00 Village Manager Terraar r gave an overview of the Pub 1 *1 c Representation Budgete Mr. Burghard explained that Publl*,c Representation includes expenses related to the II of the Mayor and V1' Ilage Board as well as other Boards and Commissi�ons serving the VA.Uage of Mount Prospect, In addon to the regular activ i � t i es of the Vi'llag,e Board, Public Repr,eentatL*on includes expenses related to the many Committees, Commissions and Boards consisting of Citizens , volunteerin& their time and resources in the areas of Planning, Zoning, Finance, Traffic Safety, Development and Public Safety. Mr., Burghard reported that there were no. s ignif idant changes in the total amount budgeted for Public Represen.tation for the 1985-1986 fiscal year. He noted that some of I noteworthy expenditures in this area included a contribution to the Northwest Municipal Conference, the annual Audit, special projects and monies for anticipated testing for Police and Fire eliglbility1ists., The Village Manager then proceeded to give the Committee ol the Whole an overview of the Village Administration Budget, The Village Administration Budget has within 'it the Villag4 Manager's Office who is the Chief Executive Officer of thi Village and is directly responsible for the administratiol of policies and programs adopted by the Village Board. Th4 total Budget for Village Administration amounted to approxi . mate'ly $566,000. The overall Budget for the Villagq Manager's office for 1985-1986 reflects an increase- oi approximately $24,000 over 1984-1985. Some of the iteml budgeted for in the Village Manager's Office include lega'. services, training costs, a provision for salary adjustments,. and the Cable TV Program, Comments and questions by the members of the Committee of the Whole 'included the following: The probable need to budget approximately $10,000 additional dollars for the much needed Garbage Study to be conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference, the possibility of an 'increase in pay for Trustees, the elimination of legal counsel at Board rueetings, publicizing the results of burglary prosecutions, the possilbility of earmarking some Cable TV Revenue for future expenditures and a regular reporting of the number of injury claims filed by Village employees. V16 MANAGER'S REPOORT Mr. Burghard reported that the tour of the Village of Homewood by the Mayor and Board of Trustees and representa- tives of the various Taxing Districts in the Village of Mount Prospect with regarding to TAX INCREMENT FINANCING was well received. The Village Manager also reported that progress in neRotiations for an EMERGENCY WATER INTER- CONNECTION with the City of Des Plaines were progressing smoothly. The purpose of the back-up syst em was to supply the Village with emergency sources of water should there be delays 'in the completion of the Lake Michigan Water Project and if the Village wells failed during spring and summer. Mr. Burghard stated that the Village currently has operation an emergency interconnection with the Village of Arlington Heights. Vle ANY OTHER BUSINESS OWOOO Mayor Krause announced that the Joint Action Water Agency would be meeting on Wednesday, January 30, The Mayor also reminded the other Committee members that Saturday, February 2 would be Coffee with Council at which the new Aide to Representative Crane would be in attendance. IM The Mayor 'also nl,otilf ked t,h,e, Bo,a,r,d' memners a,t 'on Monldal'yll S, t, Raymwon,c ool had invited, Fiob,ruarl,y ki the, 's-t,,,ud"Ie,,,nit sl,, of V, s, S c,hl o fl" e at 30 a, m. for the pu�rpos e: ol' meeting, withu thn,�O.,, tud'en,�'t"'s wo were s.nx:,,d,,n',,g Local ,g,,,o,,,v exnt, mweO t V11. ADJOURINMW beinng, n, fu,rther bu's T,her,,e ift-e,-ss, the- miee-,tihg, wa,'s',�, adjou, PT"O at, a 'y Respectfully "aubmitted TIERRANCE Lo, 'BURGHARD, lIrrew