Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW Agenda Packet 03/13/2007 J%;;;. ~~;;~\"-~~;~~~o / >~'-""----'~':./Y"'J- '\ \ i ,#;~ {:;;;<Ck \ ' (/1 ~I ,r~/. \~ \ \. I oS ,. 1m \ I ""-:~;. -'L ~il!ltge ufjl!tllmf ~rtl:!l.p'trf / \~~~/ '<'~.:..~ 'LlllII.JlL)--- COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA Meeting Location: Mount Prospect Village Hall 50 South Emerson Street Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Mayor Irvana K. Wilks Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee John Korn Trustee Michael Zadel II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27,2007 III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IV. GIS/PV WEB/HANSEN DEMONSTRATION Public Works staff will update the Board on efforts to utilize computer technology to improve asset management, customer service, work management, and increase the efficiency of business processes. Presentations will be made detailing the Village's geographic information system (GIS) and the public works department's enterprise-wide infrastructure management system. V. EMERALD ASH BORER UPDATE Forestry/Grounds staff will once again update the Board on recent developments in the fight to control Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) in Illinois. Since last August's update, staff has been actively involved in attempts to convey municipal concerns to local legislators as well as state and federal agencies. With an expected May 1 start of the beetle's flight season, staff will ask the Board to consider signing the Illinois Department of Agriculture's "Compliance Agreement" and begin discussing the possibility of emergency EAB funding should the beetle be found in Mount Prospect. VI. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT . STATUS VII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT NOTE:ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODA TION TO PARTlCIPA TE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE A T 50 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064. MA YOR !rvana K. Wilks MountPtospect TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wrn. Hoerert A. John Korn Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele W. Skowron Michael A. Zade! Phone: (847) 392-6000 Fax: (847) 392-6022 TOO: (847) 392-6064 VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK M. Lisa Angell Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 o R D E R OF BUS I N E S S SPECIAL MEETING Meeting Location: Mount Prospect Village Hall 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday March 13, 2007 6:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Mayor Irvana K. Wilks Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee A. John Korn Trustee Michael Zadel III. CLOSED SESSION LAND ACQUISITION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (5) - The purchase or lease of real property for the use of the public body, including meetings held for the purpose of discussing whether a particular parcel should be acquired. PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (1) - The appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific employees of the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee to determine its validity. IV. ADJOURNMENT ***** ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO A TTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064. MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FEBRUARY 20, 2007 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m., in the Village Board Room of Village Hall, 50 South Emerson Street, by Mayor Irvana Wilks. Present at the meeting were: Trustees Timothy Corcoran, Paul Hoefert, John Korn, Richard Lohrstorfer, Michaele Skowron and Michael Zade!. Staff members present included: Village Manager Michael Janonis, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl, and Community Development Director William Cooney. II. MINUTES Approval of Minutes of November 14, 2006. Motion made by Trustee Hoefert and seconded by Trustee Corcoran. Minutes were approved. III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Jim Uszler, Executive Director of Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce spoke. He thanked the Village for its cooperation in coordinating the Candidates Forum that occurred on February 24. He also wanted to highlight a Home Health Wellness Expo on March 3 at the new Sheraton Hotel in Wheeling. IV. AT&T PROJECT LlGHTSPEED David Strahl, AT&T Director of External Affairs spoke. He provided an overview of the product and how AT&T has cooperated with other communities to provide the proposed video product to interested customers and residents. He is requesting the Village Board consider approving a proposal by AT&T to start construction of the necessary infrastructure enhancements to provide the video product to the residents in the community. He also highlighted the components of an alternative franchise agreement between the Village and AT&T. He provided an overview of the commitment of AT&T and its service and support of the Project Lightspeed. He stated the offering of Project Lightspeed video service to residents of Mount Prospect would lower the cable rates to residents within the community and to date he and representatives from AT&T have talked to over 200 communities throughout Illinois and have obtained four agreements with those communities. He stated many communities want 100% build out in order to service the entire community however AT&T's position is to provide service based on market needs and returns. He started that there has also been some discussion regarding the VRAD boxes and the placement of these boxes in the right of way. These boxes are necessary to convert the video signal from the fiber optic lines for insertion into the copper phone lines through the cross boxes which currently provide phone service to area residents. 1 He stated AT&T can not serve the entire community through the Phase I build out which is scheduled through 2008. He stated this build out is limited based on available capital that must be spread among the many communities throughout the thirteen state AT&T coverage region. He also stated the addition of these boxes would expand DSL service from approximately 70% to approximately 90% of the community. The general comments from the Village Board members included the following items. · There were numerous comments regarding the need or desire to have more extensive if not 100% coverage of the community. · There were also questions regarding the advocacy funding that AT&T has undertaken with so called "Grass Roots Organizations". · There were also questions regarding actual price reductions for subscribers and incumbent communities once Project Lightspeed was introduced. · There was extensive discussion regarding the VRAD boxes their size, location, and opportunities to minimize their impact upon the right of way. · Several Trustees questioned the possible revenue which may be generated from this service and its impact on the existing incumbent cable providers. · There was a discussion regarding possible citizens' complaints as to the location to the VRAD boxes in the right of way and how such complaints might be addressed. Assistant Village Manager Dave Strahl provided information to the Village Board regarding the proposed location of the VRAD cabinets and the potential impacts regarding these locations and how staff might work to minimize such impacts if the Village Board were interested with moving forward with this product. He also provided information regarding the proposed coverage areas that would include more DSL service and the addition of the video service product. Dave Strahl, AT&T, External Affairs Manager spoke. He stated there is a current bill pending at the General Assembly, House Bill 1500, which would establish state wide franchise agreements and preserve the rights of way and revenue sources for the communities but would not block entry into the individual community markets as many of the franchise negotiations partly cause. He stated he has no knowledge as to what Phase II might be and when it would start; therefore if the community were to be fully served it would be under a different phase than this initial construction phase. Consensus of the Village Board was to request additional information. The information requested includes the following items: 1. Determine from existing cable franchise agreements whether there were time frame provisions requiring a build out throughout the community by other cable providers. 2. A disclosure statement by AT&T outlining the amount of funding they currently provide to "Grass Roots Organizations" to pressure residents, citizens, and legislators to obtain favorable legislation. This disclosure will also include a listing of all the grass roots organizations currently funded by AT&T for this purpose. 3. Request consideration from AT&T that if a franchise agreement were reached that as technology changes in the future the VRAD boxes should become smaller. When the boxes do become smaller the existing large boxes would be replaced as part of a franchise agreement between AT&T and the Village. 2 4. AT&T is to provide a listing of actual cable rates and how they have changed due to Project Lightspeed entry into the market within each specific community. 5. Review House Bill 1500 to determine whether there is a revenue impact upon the Village. 6. Confirm with AT&T whether the footprint as provided in the graphic illustration to the Board includes the cross box as part of the overall footprint. Once this information has been provided to the Village Board then a follow up discussion about the other restrictive items that AT&T has previously articulated could take place to determine whether there is an interest by the Village Board to proceed or not. V. RETAIL CONSULTANT STATUS REPORT Cathy Maloney, Contract Retail Consultant spoke. She provided an overview of her activities during the past year, including the marketing and communication activities that she has undertaken. She stated one of the first items she undertook was a community interest survey, which was very helpful in determining what the community was interested in supporting or felt what was needed to be developed as a retail base. She also has undertaken numerous meetings with marketing contacts and brokers to focus on retail development including boutique grocers, apparel/accessory services, home decor/gifts, hobbies/toys and games, dinning/entertainment, and shops to compliment existing businesses currently here including home and fitness. She stated she has developed a very good working relationship with the MPDMA and they have been very helpful in getting the word out about the interest in retail opportunities in the community. She stated she felt the first year was a foundation year where tangible results will become more noticeable in the upcoming year. Several comments from the Village Board members included the following items: Several board members stated it was important to establish the contacts and the marketing strategy for retail development in the community and expect results in the upcoming year. Consensus of the Village Board was to continue the relationship with the consultant. VI. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT David Lindgen, Chairman of the EDC spoke. He presented a twelve page report to the Village Board, which includes a summary of the business development in town including some warehouse expansion that is currently taking place on vacant property in the community. He stated the number of permits remains steady so there is much interest in the community. He stated that EDC members have been working with Cathy Maloney and have participated in business retention visits throughout the community. He also stated that one of the major limiting factors for continued business growth in the community is the property tax situation within Cook County, which has a detrimental competitive impact compared to other counties. 3 VII. 2007 COW Topic Discussion Village Manager Janonis reviewed all the topics that had been submitted and described them to obtain a consensus as to inclusion for discussions during 2007. The items include the following: · Multi Family Zoning Regulations · Space needs report for public safety building and Public Works in addition to Station 14 · Landscape in the Right Of Way regarding sight obstruction issues · Fences on major roadways for uniform appearance · Lean Project List Review · Mature Tree Policy For Private Property Tree Protection · Succession Planning · Floor Area Ratio Discussion · Downtown Traffic and Coordination Discussion . PVC Fencing . E-Bill Payment Policy · Long Term Financial Policy and Strategy · Review Business License Fee Schedule . Emerald Ash Borer Discussion . Rand Road Corridor · Exclusive Commercial Refuse Contract and Discussion On Recycling Revenue Return · Pool Vehicle Discussion Regarding Hybrid and E85 Vehicles . Sanitary Sewer Flow Monitoring Results . Comprehensive Plan Update . Zoning Code Update . Village Emergency Operations Center Development . Emergency Medical Services Substations . Live Streaming and Internet Archiving of Village Board Meeitings . Neighborhood Resource Center . Review Boards and Commissions Structure · Regional Informational Technology Departments and Consolidation . Common Village Identity · Indoor Clean Air Ordinance Revisions regarding restaurants that want to change a liquor license in order to allow smoking to continue (this item did not get consensus support for further discussion) . LED Lighting Options · Additional Redevelopment Options Outside of the Downtown Arlene Jurasek, 303 S. Lancaster spoke. She commented that Com Ed has a new rate structure regarding the cost of electricity for street lights and the Village may want to consider Grant opportunities to address the electrical power increase. VII. VILLAGE MANAGERS REPORT None 4 IX. OTHER BUSINESS Mayor Wilks mentioned the upcoming Kiwanis Club Spaghetti Dinner at Grace Lutheran Church on March 3rd. She also mentioned the Kiwanis scholarship program is currently recruiting applicants. X. ADJOURNAMENT There was no further business to discuss, the Committee of the Whole adjourned at 9:58 p.m. DAVID STRAHL Assistant Village Manager 5 Mount Prospect INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM @) TRill: CITY USA Mount Prospect Public Works Department TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS FROM: FORESTRY/GROUNDS SUPERINTENDENT DATE: MARCH 13,2007 SUBJECT: EMERALD ASH BORER UPDATE At the August 8, 2006 Committee of the Whole meeting, Forestry/Grounds staff provided an overview of the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) threat. The following includes a brief summary ofthe problem and an update on activities at the state, federal and local levels since that time. The update is followed by staff recommendations specific to Mount Prospect. The Problem Since August 2006, there have been several additional finds of EAB in Illinois. Attachment A shows the currently known infestations in our state; all are in Cook or Kane Counties. As previously explained, EAB threatens to destroy all ash trees in Illinois and perhaps the nation. Recent estimates state- that 25 million trees have already been lost nationwide due to this insect. The Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) recently updated an estimate of potential costs to remove and replace all the state's ash trees. As seen in Attachment B, the total estimate exceeds $5.5 billion. In Mount Prospect, 4348 publicly-owned trees (roughly one of every six) is an ash. The number of privately owned ashes has been estimated at 4000. The death of these trees would be a substantial loss to the Village's urban forest, depriving our citizens of the numerous benefits that healthy trees provide. Additionally, costs to the Village and to our citizens would be monumental. As seen in Attachment C, we recently updated our cost estimates for removal and replacement of publicly owned ashes, using recent bid prices. The cost of public ash tree and stump removals went up from an August 2006 estimate of $1.1 million to a revised cost of $1.85 million. Added to the previous estimate of $ 1.5 million for tree planting, the new total for removal and replacement amounts to $3.4 million. (Note that these figures do not include any estimates for increased debris handling costs because they are still unknown at this time.) Villa2e Efforts Since AU2ust With the help and support of Mayor Wilks, Forestry/Grounds staffwas able to meet with our local state legislators and brief them on the magnitude of the problem. The briefing resulted in a well-attended Roundtable discussion in the Village Hall, hosted by the Northwest Municipal Conference, and development of a "White Paper" of Municipal Concerns. All the legislators expressed their gratitude and concern, and several have gone on to pursue action at the state level, as explained below. H:\FORESTRY\EAB IN MP\MEMO-EAB-BRD-UPDATE MAR 07.DOC Forestry/Grounds staff members have also been active in the development of the state "Municipal EAB Team" and the Northwest Municipal Conference's "EAB Best Practices Committee". Many hours have been spent at these and other meetings with state and federal officials, offering municipal cooperation wherever possible but also pressing for decisive action and funding by state and federal authorities. Forestry crews spent considerable time last September working with Morton Arboretum staff on the Arboretum's "Ash Felling" project. This was a very labor-intensive task, involving the removal of selected parkway ashes in our town and then manually stripping off multiple bark samples to try to detect any hidden larvae. (Note that all trees were being removed for reasons other than EAB and no larvae were found.) Our crew repeated the same process on additional ash removals this past February and shared the results with the Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDOA). We also continued to inspect suspect ashes on public property as they were observed, and on private property by request. Public education efforts continued, including information packet distribution, news releases, Village Newsletter and website updates and a Comcast news segment. Finally, the Village Arboricultural Standards Manual was modified so that ash trees are now prohibited for future planting on public right-of way. A memo was also sent to the Community Development Department, asking them to modify their private property Landscape Ordinance in the same manner. Proposed State Le2islation In the past month, we have learned of two promising pieces of proposed legislation. The first, Senate Bill 1617, proposes low-interest or zero-interest loans to municipalities for replacement of public trees lost due to EAR This bill was introduced in February by Senator Jeffrey Schoenberg and co-sponsored by our own legislators Senator Susan Garrett and Senator Dan Kotowski. Few details have been included in the bill thus far. The second, Senate Bill 0550, was introduced in February by Senator Kirk Dillard. This bill proposes that the IDOA promulgate rules to control firewood importation into the state. Again, no details are included, but this could be a very useful piece of legislation since most of the rapid spread of EAB has been attributed to the movement of firewood. EAB Team The Illinois EAB team, chaired by the Morton Arboretum's Edith Makra, has several sub-committees working on specific issues. Two significant accomplishments include a proposal for grant funds to increase ash wood utilization opportunities in the state, and the "Insecticide Guidelines" included in Attachment D. Though the official USDA-APHIS position still does not endorse pesticides, these guidelines now provide unbiased facts that will help property owners decide whether to treat their trees. (We have posted these guidelines on the Village website). Federal Activities USDA-APHIS is overseeing the state delimiting survey described below. They also conduct research, fund public outreach efforts, and have helped develop a "Recommended Tree Species" list for H:\Forestry\EAB IN MP\MEMO-EAB-BRD-UPDATE MAR 07.doc 2 reforestation in Illinois. Research on biological controls has revealed a parasitic wasp (Tetrastichus planipennis) that helps control EAB in its native China; tests are underway to see ifit could be useful in the United States. Additionally, since August APHIS has adopted stricter rules about transporting deciduous firewood over state lines. Shortly thereafter, at our request, they sent an inspector to a local firewood dealer operating near Mount Prospect's corporate limits to make sure no laws were being violated. State ActivitieslIssues The Illinois Department of Agriculture is the lead agency for EAB control in our state, while the Illinois Department of Natural Resources plays a supportive role. The IDOA has finally posted some job announcements for the additional positions that were made possible by the $7.6 million that Senator Dick Durbin helped procure last summer. They have recently begun to cooperate and communicate more effectively with municipalities, and made their web site much more useful. Since last June, they have been conducting a delimiting survey designed to detect the full extent of the EAB infestation in Illinois. Based on this survey they have expanded state quarantines to include all of Kane County, and the portion of Cook County seen in Attachment E. The IDOA has also been working on getting municipalities and contractors in and near their quarantines to sign the "Compliance Agreement" seen in Attachment F. This agreement regulates the movement of ash material within the state, as well as the movement of all deciduous firewood out of or through quarantine zones. Additionally, on March 8, 2007 the IDOA announced that they will pay for removal, this spring only, of certain ash trees within ~ mile of a confirmed infestation. (The trees must exhibit multiple symptoms of a possible EAB infestation). They will not force these removals; the property owners can choose whether or not to participate. To our disappointment, two important activities that the IDOA has not done is to publish their work plan and budget as requested, or to establish subsidized marshalling yards where ash logs can be taken. There is strong municipal support for both of these, especially a marshalling yard within the Cook County quarantine area. Currently, there is no place within that quarantine area where ash logs can be taken during the beetle's flight season. The Illinois Department of Natural Resources has also updated their website and distributed periodic updates to municipal arborists. They are also again revising their recommended framework for a "Community EAB Readiness Plan". Unfortunately, the current version recommends certain activities that seem unreasonable or extremely costly for individual municipalities. These include the suggestions that municipalities: 1) License and pre-qualify tree care companies to work in their town (including on private property) and 2) Establish a permitting/monitoring system for firewood vendors. The first idea has some merit in that it could protect the public from a rash of untrained and unlicensed individuals with chainsaws claiming they can safely remove trees. However, it would require a good deal of time from municipal staff, and could increase municipal liability. The second would be extremely time-consuming and costly as well. H:\Forestry\EAB IN MP\MEMO-EAB-BRD-UPDATE MAR 07.doc 3 Additionally, both the IDOA and IDNR are suggesting that communities should begin considering ash reduction plans. This involves the systematic removal of ash trees before EAB hits, the idea being that the crisis will be more manageable that way and new plantings can start growing immediately. The most extreme example of this is Wilmette's highly publicized plan to remove all their public ash trees within the next seven years, which is being funded by a 2% tax increase. I personally believe this measure of ash reduction is too extreme, although it is probably advisable for Mount Prospect to being removing some poor quality ash trees, or those with a high frequency of branch failure ("hangers"), when our budget allows. Yard Waste Concerns/Garbaee Concerns Very recently, we learned that there could be soine problems in Cook County related to yard waste and garbage collection. Because homeowners can put out tree branches and logs that may be ash, the companies that haul these products are being asked to sign Compliance Agreements, and they need to abide by the state and federal laws. The IDOA has recently stated they need ARC Disposal and SW ANCC to do so. It is unknown at this time how seriously this will affect current practices or contracts. (Attachment G shows how ash brush/logs in Mount Prospect are currently handled). Staff Plans and Recommendations In addition to continuing the activities we are already involved in, Forestry/Grounds hopes to accomplish the following in the coming year: ., Further develop our "Community Readiness Plan" III Increase awareness ofEAB by the Illinois Municipal League. ., Attend additional community events to distribute EAB information .. Further refine our list of possible candidates for an "ash reduction policy" (due to poor condition and/or frequency of broken limbs) ., Consider whether an EAB Nuisance ordinance should be recommended to the Board at a future date. (We do not believe it is prudent to recommend this to the Board at this time because there are still too many questions unanswered by the State.) Additionally, we will continue to recommend that citizens aid in the battle by helping to look for the beetle, reporting stressed ashes, planting for diversity, providing proper care for trees, and restricting firewood movement. Additionally, we plan to issue a news release asking citizens to burn any firewood that may include ash before May 1 st. Finally, at this time we are recommending that the Village Board consider signing the IDOA Compliance Agreement, and also begin discussions about the possible need for emergency funds for the day when EAB inevitably is found in Mount Prospect. ~/ '-~ -,,",,- ~ Sandy dark CUL ,:....~..~. H:\Forestry\EAB IN MP\MEMO-EAB-BRD-UPDATE MAR 07.doc 4 I concur: /~~ Attachments A. Map of EAB Finds in Illinois B. IDNR "Money Matters" C. Mount Prospect Cost Estimates Updated March 2007 D. U of! Extension's Insecticide Guidelines E. Map of Current Cook County Quarantine F. IDOA Compliance Agreement G. Current Ash Brush/Log Disposal Methods in Mount Prospect H:\Forestry\EAB IN MP\MEMO-EAB-BRD-UPDATE MAR 07.doc 5 WI ATT/lel7 HEIUT B Money Matters $ Facts about Ash Trees and EAB. These figures were based on research data with the worst case scenario for Emerald Ash Borer. CURRENT EAB STATUS FACT: Since the Emerald Ash Borer was discovered in 2002, it has already destroyed 20 million trees in five states or about $10 billion of trees (based solely on tree removal costs) and at least $20 billion to replace these trees with smaller diameter trees. ILLINOIS ASH TREE POPULATION STATUS FACT: Illinois has an estimated 110 - 130 million ash trees in its private lands, public areas, and communities. GENERAL BENEFITS FROM 110 MILLION ASH TREES fACT: According to the American Forest organization, it takes ten trees to provide enough oxygen for one person per year. Therefore, Illinois' 110 million ash trees provide enough oxygen for 11 million people per year (nearly the entire population of Illinois). FACT: According to "Illinois Report on Sustainable Forest Management: Criteria and Indicators", the majority of elm-ash-cottonwood forest type is between 20-60 years of age. This is the age where trees maximize their carbon sequestration. The elm-ash-cottonwood forest type contains 22.8% of the relative carbon content on Illinois timberland. Assuming that ash is an equal 1/3 of this forest type then a total of nearly 8% of the carbon content stored in ash trees could be lost as infested ash trees are incinerated. GENERAL IMPACT ON URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTS FACT: "Illinois Tree City USA communities spend approximately $82 million annually on tree planting and care," per Illinois Urban Conservation Program's annual survey of Illinois Tree City USA Program participants. This amount will likely increase as communities are forced to remove ash trees infested with the Emerald Ash Borer and reforest their communities. FACT: Urban and community forestry is a part of a .$4.7 billion industry in Illinois. This industry includes nurseries, municipal and public forest managers, arborists and landscape contractors. Some nurseries may suffer from the loss of ash tree sales. Arborists could have a boom in tree removal requests. Municipal foresters and arborists will be actively removing and replacing community trees as EAB spreads to their communities. The cost to Illinois communities can range from $8,000 for the very small towns to $1.2 billion in Chicago. FACT: According to the American Forests organization, a mature tree during its life time can provide about $57,000 worth of amenity benefits such as: oxygen, energy savings, protection from the sun, erosion control, pollution control and wildlife benefits. According to "Urban Forest Structure: The State of Chicago's Urban Forest" by David J. Nowak, Research Forester, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Chicago and surrounding NE Illinois Counties have 4,627,500 trees in the study area alone. If these ash trees were able to reach maturity and provide those benefits, Northeastern Illinois citizens would receive $263,767,500,000 (trillion) in amenity benefits. H:\Foreslry\EAB NEWS NOT MP\IDNR Money Matters.doc ESTIMATE Of ASH TREE VALUE: Illinois has an estimated 5 million urban and community trees. Using the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers' methodology, the average estimated value of a tree in a community is about $1000 per tree (for insurance, litigation, or replacement purposes) as referenced by the low estimate associated with the Nov. 2001 "A study of CTLA formula Values" by Gary Watson (pg 289). Using this estimate, Illinois' urban and community forestry ash trees would be worth: $5 trillion. POTENTIAL TREE REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT COSTS TO ALL ILLINOIS COMMUNITIES (NOTE: THESE COSTS DO NOT INCLUDE RESIDUAL WOOD HANDLING COSTS) fACT: Suburbs and DuPage County Public Spaces were inventoried. According to "Urban Forest Structure: The State of Chicago's Urban Forest" by David J. Nowak, USDA Forest Service, in NE Illinois Cook and Dupage County suburbs there are 4,132,100 ash trees planted. If tree removal and replacement costs combined are $ 800 per tree, then the estimated cost to Illinois suburban communities would be: $3,305,680,000 or over $3 billion. fACT: CITY EXAMPLE#l In 1996, Wood ridge, IL (a 15 year Tree City USA community) received a grant for IDNR to conduct an inventory of their community forest. Based on the results of this inventory, this Illinois medium sized community (population 33(000) had a tree population of approx. 8,000 public trees. At the time of the tree inventory 25% of the public trees were ash. Therefore, if the Emerald Ash Borer were to infest all of the publicly- owned ash trees, Wood ridge would lose 2000 trees. According to the survey the majority of the ash trees are now from 8- 18 inches with an average size of 12 inches. Using an estimated average for tree removal cost of $500 per tree to remove all ash trees, the potential cost for removing all ash trees in Woodridge would be: $1,000,000. Using the Northern Illinois tree replacement (purchase and planting) price of $400 per 3 inch diameter tree, it would cost an additional $800,000 to implement a tree for tree replacement policy. Therefore, EAB could cost Wood ridge an estimated $1.8 million to remove and replace all public-owned ash trees should they become infested. fACT: CITY EXAMPLE#2 Urbana is a 30 year Tree City USA community with a population of about 37,000. According to City Arborist, Mike Brunk, Urbana has 13,000 public trees of which 5.6% are ash. With this excellent but not typical percentage of ash, Urbana has 728 ash trees. The average age of the ash trees was estimated at 14- 15 years with an average size of 15 inches. He estimates the average cost for tree removal and stump grinding at $400 to $500 per tree. The potential removal/stump grinding cost for all ash trees in Urbana would be: between $291,200 to $364,000. Using the Central Illinois tree purchase and planting price of $350, the one for one replacement cost would be an additional $254,800. Therefore, EAB could cost Urbana an estimated $546,000 to $618,800 to remove and replace all publicly-owned ash trees should they become infested. fACT: CITY EXAMPLE #3 Chicago (population 3 million) is the largest of Illinois' 1,350 municipalities. According to "Urban Forest Structure: The State of Chicago's Urban Forest" by David J. Nowak, USDA forest Service, of the 4.1 million urban trees, 603,000 are ash trees. According to the study, ash trees are small to mid range in diameter. Using the $1000 removal cost per tree since the trees are of smaller caliper; EAB could cost Chicago $603,000,000 for removals. A $1000 per tree replacement cost due to union labor would equal $603,000,000. Thus 100% loss due to EAB could cost Chicago $1.206 billion to sustain its urban forest canopy. H:\Forestry\EAB NEWS NOT MP\IDNR Money Matters.doc FACT: Non- Chicago and collar county areas contain several mid sized and small communities. It is estimated that these mid-sized communities have 274,000 ash trees. Using $800 per tree for removal and replacement, EAB could potentially cost mid-sized communities $219,200,000 for tree removal and replacement should a 100% loss occur. Of 1,350 Illinois municipalities, there are 1212 communities with populations under 25,000 and most are outside the NE Illinois area. According to the "Illinois Small Communities Tree Programs: Attitudes, Status and Needs" by Green, Howe and Schroeder, 1998, tree populations in small communities range from 377 to 7,638 trees. Using an average of 4000 trees per community and assuming that 20% of the trees are ash trees, there would be an estimated 969,600 ash trees in small Illinois communities. Using $500 each for tree removal and $350 each for tree planting, our small rural Illinois communities could be faced with a cost of $824,160,000 for removal and replacement. In summary, the economic impact on the remaining community forests (mid sized and small communities in the non-NE area) could be: $1,043,360,000 or over $1 billion. FACT: The combined total of potential loss of ash trees in all of Illinois communities is estimated at over $5,555,040,000 billion. This amount would double or triple if debris removal and other community costs taken into consideration. ECONOMIC IMPACT ON RURAL PRIVATE LANDS-BOARD FOOT VOLUME FACT: According to "Illinois Report on Sustainable Forest Management: Criteria and Indicators" p. 13 Table 6. Volume of live trees on timberland in Illinois: 1998, there is 352,341,000 cubic feet of timber volume of ash in Illinois and an additional 312,155,000 cubic feet of growing stock. Ash lumber prices fluctuate between $100-$150 per thousand board feet. Illinois' forest industry has the potential of a $99,674,400 loss to its economy based just on the market value of ash trees in timberland. CITIZEN ALERT AND CAUTION FACT: During storm events and insect epidemics, unqualified and unscrupulous people may show up and call themselves arborists. Some citizens may meet individuals who will ask for payment up front and never deliver the service. Citizens lose money each year for tree service fraud or from property damage by people who simply know how to run a chain saw but don't know how to safely take down a big tree. Always check your tree service credentials. See if they are a certified arborist or degreed forester. See the International Society of Arboriculture's Certified Arborist list at (http://www.isa- arbor.com/findArboristjfindarborist.aspx) and make sure they are bonded (insured for damages they might cause). Also, check with your local municipality and see if tree workers need a permit in order to be able to provide tree removal services within the municipal boundary. Many cities have permit systems to safeguard their citizens from unqualified or fraudulent tree care services. From the Prairie Tree Companion Newsletter, first published Summer 2006, by Dr. Renee Hildebrandt of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The Prairie Tree Companion Newsletter is published periodically by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Urban Forestry Program. Submit potential copy and address any inquiries to Reinee Hildebrandt, Urban Conservation P,rogram Administrator and Prairie Tree Companion Newsletter Editor, One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1271 or phone 217/785-8771. Reinee. h i Idebra ndt@illinois.gov H:\Forestry\EAB NEWS NOT MPIIDNR Money Matters.doc Mount Prospect Director Glen R. Andler ~ Deputy Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Attachment C Updated Cost Estimates Related to Mount Prospect's Parkway Ash Population March 8, 2007 Total number of parkway ash trees 4348 This number includes a total of 6 different species of Fraxinus, consisting of 19 different varieties. The sizes range from 1" to 34" in trunk diameter. Note that one of every six of our parkway trees is an ash. Appraised value of all parkway ash trees $11,800,000.00 The above value is a conservative estimate based on the current values used in our computerized tree inventory. (This figure could be as high as $18,800,000.00 using the most current formulas from the Guide for Plant Appraisal 9th edition, prepared by The Council of Tree Landscape Appraisal and sanctioned by The International Society of Arboriculture). Cost to remove all parkway ash trees and stumps $1,845,700.00 This figure was calculated by using actual 2007 contract prices for tree and stump removal. These prices are good through 2007 and may be extended through 2008, if both the contractor and the Village agree to do so. (These prices include debris disposal as long as Mount Prospect is not in a quarantine area. No cost estimates can currently be made for any additional debris processing that may be needed due to quarantine expansion.) Cost to replace all 4348 ash trees with a mix of species $1,535,000.00 This figure was calculated by using our 2006 actual average contractual cost, $353.00 per tree, to plant and guarantee each 2.5" tree for one year. Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 H:\Forestry\EAB IN MP\COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY (2007).doc www.mountprospect.org Cost of annual preventative chemical control for EAB on parkway ash trees. $455,000.00 Though not currently recommended, preventative chemical control would consist of an annual soil injection with insecticide and two annual trunk applications with insecticide. This figure was calculated by using a contractual cost estimate of $1.78 per diameter inch to inject a total of 58,922 diameter inches of ash trees, costing $105,000.00. Trunk application cost is based on an estimate of $40.00 per application for 4348 ash trees, applied twice annually costing a total of $350,000.00. (Per discussion with Davey Tree Company Fall 2006) Cost to process yard waste From recent discussions we've learned that brush/logs from collection of private yard will need to be treated as ifthey contain ash. It's possible there will be additional unspecified costs to municipalities when SW ANCC and Arc Disposal are forced by the I DOA to sign compliance agreements. Notes: 1) Our typical annual Forestry budget for maintenance of 24,000 trees is around $1,000,000.00 2) None of the above estimates include ash trees on private property in Mount Prospect; we estimate there are approximately 4000 of these trees. 3) Based on recent information, brush chipping (if chipper blades are kept sharp) will suffice to make debris from tree trimming a non-regulated material. Also, we don't believe stump grindings will have to be handled in a different manner than in the past if the grindings are smaller than the regulated size (1 "xi" in two dimensions). Therefore, we don't believe the disposal of chips and stump grindings will raise trimming/stump removal costs. Prepared by Sandy Clark Forestry/Grounds Superintendent March 8, 2007 Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 H:\Forestry\EAB IN MP\COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY (2007).doc www.mountprospect.org ,~1 thet, n?ent b EMERALD ASH BORER INSECTICIDAL MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION Entomology Fact Sheet, NHE-163 Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Efforts to manage the emerald ash borer on a large scale are primarily being conducted by federal and state agencies. There are many unanswered questions concerning the prevention or control of emerald ash borer, including the uncertainty ofthe effectiveness of any insecticidal control efforts on emerald ash borer. Current large scale activities being conducted to eradicate emerald ash borer or slow its spread Nursery stock, lumber, wood product, and firewood quarantines Infestation surveys Tree removal · Outreach education Research on the insect and its management options Factors when considering whether to attempt insecticidal control The only certain method to control emerald ash borer is to remove the tree. Healthy trees growing in a location with proper soil, fertility, light, wind exposure, and other environmental factors will survive attack longer than those in poorer health. · Weigh the value ofthe tree in the landscape against the cost of treatment, including its eventual removal. If many trees are being removed in an area, it will probably be less expensive to have it removed than at a later date. A tree in a regulated area is likely to be removed regardless of whether it has been treated or shows signs of borer infestation. · Cost of the purchase and planting of replacement trees not susceptible to emerald ash borer should be considered. Only ash trees in the genus Fraxinus are susceptible. Mountain ash and all other trees are not susceptible to this borer. Be sure that a variety of trees is planted in the neighborhood. This ensures that the loss of one or a few kinds of tree in the future will not be as devastating. Features of insecticidal control efforts Preventatively treat ash trees no more than 10-12 miles from known infestations. Control is more effective on smaller trees, with a trunk diameter of less than 1 0 inches. · Ifmany infested untreated ash trees are nearby, insecticide and other controls are unlikely to protect the tree due to the heavy onslaught of beetles from nearby infestations. It is more difficult to keep a tree alive that is already infested with emerald ash borer, whether or not dieback is occurring. · Research is ongoing to determine if tree survival continues or if insecticidal treatment is just delaying the death of the tree. · Follow insecticide label directions. Professional insecticidal control options lmidacloprid (Merit, IMA-jet, Imicide, Pointer) injected into the tree or the soil around it annually appears to be the best option to protect the tree from EAB. Soil treatments should be made within two feet of the trunk. Foliar and bark sprays ofbifenthrin (Onyx), cyfluthrin (Tempo), permethrin (Astro), or carbaryl (Sevin) in both mid May and mid to late June will control visiting beetles and hatching larvae. Homeowner do-it-yourself insecticidal control options Apply Bayer Advanced Garden Tree and Shrub Insect Control, containing imidacloprid. Due the chances of insecticide drift to other areas, and the specialized equipment needed for application to large trees, foliar and bark application is best handled by certified arborists or other professional horticulturists. Factors concerning treatment with imidacloprid Soil injections take 1 to 2 months to move throughout the tree. Apply them within two feet of the trunk. o Trunk injections take about 2 weeks to move throughout the tree. e Larger trees, those with a trunk diameter of more than ten inches, take longer for the insecticide to move throughout the tree so soil treatment in the late summer or early fall when the leaves will stay green for several weeks is recommended. Trunk injections can be made in the spring. Smaller trees can be treated in the spring, but soil treatment should be made in the first half of May. Trunk injections should be accomplished by early June. A higher level of control is achieved once the tree has been treated for at least 2 years. Certified arborists provide expertise in properly treating emerald ash borer as well as expertly maintaining the health of ash and other trees and are listed at: http://www.illinoisarborist.org/. More information on emerald ash borer is available at: http://www.agr.state.il.us/Environment/ Pest/index.html and http://www.emeraldashborer.info/. If you see emerald ash borer or its damage, contact your local University of Illinois Extension Office listed at: http://web.extension. uiuc.edu/state/ or the Illinois Department of Agriculture at (800)641-3934. October 2006 Prepared by Philip L. Nixon. Extension Entomologist, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois. Input provided by the Illinois Emerald Ash Borer Readiness Team. For additional copies, contact your local University of Illinois Extension Office. CtJi.~RE~r GoD k. Go tH..rrl.f ~ U A v2..t4 rJ-t oJs 1=Eb< lOb? lake Cook Road IIIllt 0') CN ~ cu W Touh z o ::1 ::r fA ::r o ~ (') ::r A) ::l ::l ltl Howard 3 illinois A'grr'ciihure Legend Emerald Ash Borer Eradication Program Cook County, Illinois November 2006 Bureau of Environmental Programs Division of Natural Resources r~-=l C,:;-~ :7_(<1;11.' E:.S .)lloJ:r.~IIH' i-l>;"l . -~-, 1 inch equals 0.4 miles /~1-1- ~c: '-7 merIt- F Illinois Department of Agriculture EMERALD ASH BORER COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT Nursery, Nursery Dealer, Landscape Waste, Tree & Shrub Maintenance, Tree Pruning & Removal, Firewood Company Information: Company Name: _________________________________ Contact Name: MrJMs.____ _______________________ Mailing Address: Street_______ _________ _ _____ __ CitylTown __ ___ __ _ __ _ __ __ ___ _ State _ __ ___ Zip code _____ __ Telephone:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Fax:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ E-mail:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Disposal or Processing Yard Location (if different than mailing address): StreeC _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ ___ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Citylfown _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Zipcode _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Applicable to State or Federal Cooperative Domestic Quarantines for the Emerald Ash Borer (,4grilus planipennis) pursuant to the Imect Pest and Plant Disease Act (505 Dlinois Compiled Statutes 90/1 et~.) I acknowledge State and Federal regulations governing the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) and "regulated articles"*. When working within and near EAB quarantine zone(s), I agree to supply records that may be required for inspection. I agree to comply with the procedures listed in this agreement or with other procedures as required by the Director of the Illinois Department of Agriculture as follows: 1. Regulated articles shall not be moved out of quarantine zone(s) unless: a) the regulated articles have been chipped/processed to a size measuring less than 1.0 inch in two dimensions; b) the bark and outer Y2 inch of sapwood has been removed; or c) the regulated articles are moved to a certified processing site (Certified processing sites may accept any regulated articles from September 1 sl to April 30th. Only regulated articles processed to a size measuring less than 1.0 inch in two dimensions or with the bark and outer one-half inch of sapwood removed may be accepted by a certified processing site from April 30 to September 1 S\ 2. All ash stumps will be ground to eight inches (8") below the soil surface and covered with soil; 3. Employers will inform their employees about the EAB quarantine zone(s) borders and about EAB quarantine regulations. Employers will also instruct employees how to identify the EAB and its signs; 4. The Illinois Department of Agriculture will be informed of any suspected EAB infestation; 5. A copy of this compliance agreement will be carried by employees working within EAB quarantine zone(s); 6. Per this agreement, ash products, ash nursery stock and/or live ash trees that originate from or are brought into a quarantine zone may not be removed from the zone, and may be subject to confiscation and destruction; and 7. Movement of AIL deciduous (non-coniferous) firewood out of or through the quarantine zone(s) is prohibited, regardless of initial origin unless the firewood has been kiln-dried and is accompanied by an appropriate regulatory certificate. '''Regulated Articles" are hereby defined as the following: 1) The Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) in any living stage of development; 2) Ash trees (Fraxinus spp.) of any size; 3) Ash limbs and branches; 4) Any cut non-coniferous firewood; 5) Bark from ash trees and wood chips larger than one inch in two dimensions from ash trees; 6) Ash logs and lumber with either the bark or the outer one-half-inch of sapwood or both, attached; 7) Any item made from or containing the wood of the ash tree which is capable of spreading the emerald ash borer; 8) Any other article, product, or means of conveyance when it is determined by the Director of Agriculture that it presents the risk of spread of the Emerald Ash Borer in any stage of development. Affixing of1he signatures below will validate this agreement which shall remain in effect lU1til cancelled This document may be revised as necessary or revoked for nrncompliance by 1he Depamnent Signature/Title Date Signed State Agency Official Signature Compliance Agreement No: Illinois Department of Agriculture 2280 Bethany Road, Suite B DeKalb, Illinois 60115 Phone: 815-787-5476 Fax: 815-787-5488 Illinois Department of Agriculture P.O. Box 19281 Springfield, Illinois 62794-9281 Phone: 217-785-2427 Fax 217-524-4882 One original signed agreement to be maintained at the Illinois Dept. of Agriculture and a second original signed agreement to be maintained at the company office. For up-to-date information on EAB please go to: www.aar.state.il.us or www.mortonarb.ora/olantinfo/plantclinic/EAB.htm. [11/9/2006, EABComplianceAgreement IV. doc} Mount Prospect Director Glen R. Andler Deputy Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Attachment - G CURRENT ASH BRUSH/LOG DISPOSAL METHODS IN MOUNT PROSPECT March, 2007 Public Trees VillaQe crews: Crews currently chip all tree branches, up to approximately 14" in diameter, on site. (Once chipped, as long as smaller than 1" in two dimensions, the material would no longer be regulated by the state even if we were in a quarantine area.) The woodchips are then dumped at the Public Works facility, or at Melas Park. From there they are either used for mulching trees/shrubs, delivered to property owners, or hauled away and recycled by the Ramirez Company. Logs are hauled to the R.W. Hendricksen Company in Wheeling to be tub ground and recycled. Tree care contractors workina for the Villaae: It should be noted that currently Mount Prospect is not within either of the two quarantine zones. However, our 2007 contracts require that all contractors working for the Village have signed a compliance agreement with the state. Currently, all three of our contractors for 2007 have a compliance agreement with the state. R.W. Hendricksen Co. (2007 tree trimming) - takes all material to their Wheeling yard where logs are tub ground. Kramer (2007 tree removal) - takes all material to their yard in West Chicago; they are considered by the state to be a certified processing site. Winkler (2007 stump removal) - stump debris will be considered a non-regulated material due to its small size. Private Trees From Yard Waste collection bv ARC Disposal: Currently residents are allowed to put out yard debris, including woody material, along with their normal trash. All yard debris, including grass clippings and woody material up to 3.5" in diameter, is picked up as yard waste. This material is taken to ARC's yard in unincorporated Cook County near Mount Prospect, where it is then picked up by Midwest Forestree and taken to their location in East Dundee. Woody material larger than 3.5" in diameter (in other words, logs) are picked up by ARC with the regular trash and transferred to the SWANCC Transfer station in Glenview. SWANCC then distributes the refuse to numerous landfills, some of which are out of state (in Wisconsin). Private Iv hired contractors: The Village currently has no way of knowing where these contractors take debris. Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 H:\Forestry\EAB IN MP\REGULATED MATERIALS.doc www.mountprospect.org Mount Prospect Director Glen R. Andler Deputy Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA MEETING LOCATION: Public Works Building 1700 W. Central Road Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 MEETING DATE AND TIME: Monday March 12, 2007 7:00 p.m. I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Approval of Minutes IV. Citizens to be Heard V. Old Business VI. New Business A. Introduction to Safe Routes to School Program VII. Commission Issues VIII. Adjournment NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD 847/392-6064. Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 347/2tJ3-9377' l'vIount Prospect ~ Chair: Dorothy Kucera Members: Tokiko Blaine Skip Farley Janice Farley Lil Floros Mike Karsen Cindy Kiel John Kom Gary Randant Mama Reschke Paul Seils John Sibrava Mary Ann Sibrava Judy Thome Adelaide Thulin Rachel Toeppen Irvana Wilks Mount Prospect Sister Cities Commission 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 847.392.6000 SISTER CITIES COMMISSION March 15, 2007 Village Hall Community Center, 50 S. Emerson Street 5:30 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. OLD BUSINESS A. Official visit to Sevres - Irvana Wilks B. Report on Hoffman Estates Event - Rachel Toeppen C. 2007 Sister Cities Activities/Reports - Potluck Dinner - April 19 - Rachel Toeppen/Judy Thorne - French Film Festival- July 13 - Judy Thorne/Mary Ann Sibrava - Wine Tasting at Vino 100 - Maura Reschke - Jr. High Pen Pal program - Maura Reschke - PHS/Conservatoire Music Collaboration -Janice/Skip Farley - PHS/International School Exchange -Dorothy Kucera - 4th of July - parade - Gary RandanUMike Karsen - Thanksgiving in October - October 25 -Mary Ann and John Sibrava - Winter Festival - December 1 - Cindy Kiel III. NEW BUSINESS - Commission member resignation/new appointment - Illinois State Convention - April 20-21 -Belleville, IL - Rotary French Promotion - Representation at Downtown Block Party and New Residents Open House - Meeting Minutes - email soon after meeting? IV. OTHER BUSINESS - Next Sister Cities Commission meeting on May 17th V. ADJOURNMENT www.mountprospect.orJ!/sistercities sistercities@tnountprospect.org MOUNT PROSPECT SISTER CITIES COMMISSION Minutes Januarv 18.2007 Members Present: Janice Farley Skip Farley Lil Floros Mike Karsen Cindy Kiel John Kom Dorothy Kucera Gary Randant Maura Reschke Paul Seils Mary Ann Sibrava Judy Thome Rachel Toeppen Irvana Wilks Members Absent: Toikiko Blaine John Sibrava Adelaide Thulin Guests: Felicien Sirois Staff Liaison: Maura EI Metennani The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chairperson Dorothy Kucera. It was requested that items be added to the agenda. "Official Visit to Sevres" was added as item C under Old Business. "Report on Hoffman Estates Events" was added under New Business. Dorothy introduced Felicien Sirois, who generously volunteered to translate articles for the Commission. Corrections to minutes of November 16: Rachel did not attend the performance ofthe barbershop quartet. It is not the responsibility of the Programming Subcommittee to explore establishment of the "Friends of Sister Cities" group. OLD BUSINESS Winter Parade Cindy Kiel provided a report on the Winter Parade participation (see attached). Rachel Toeppen also assisted and passed out brochures. They met a woman who was very interested in getting involved. Harris Wofford Award Dorothy reported that the commission's nominee for the Sister Cities International Harris Wofford Youth Leadership A ward did not win. Official Visit to Sevres Mayor Wilks reported on email she received from Mayor Kosciusko-Morizet. He suggested September as the best time to visit. French presidential elections will be held April 22 and May 6, 2007. Their next local election is in March 2008. The Commission came to the decision to go the first week of October. It was suggested that Mayor Wilks propose this to Mayor Kosciusko-Morizet and explore the matter further. He also offered day trip options such as a trip to the Normandy Coast. The following members expressed interest in going on the trip: Gary Randant - Maybe Judy Thorne -Yes (2) Mike Karsen - Yes (1) Village of Mount Prospect January 18,2007 Meeting Minutes Page 2 2/5/2007 Maura Reschke - Maybe (2) Sibrava - Yes (2) Rachel Toeppen - Yes (2) Farleys - Yes (2) Wilks - Yes (2) Dorothy - Yes (I) NEW BUSINESS Sister Cities International Report Judy provided an update from Sister Cities International Quarterly Newsletter: II The organization is pursuing legislation to obtain funding from Congress for exchanges. Ii Young Artist Showcase - will be on exhibit in Union Station, DC .. Gathering of the Youth - Youth Conference/Summit Materials were distributed for both State and National Conferences. 2007 Programs ( see attached) The subcommittee discussed the following activities/events: III Thanksgiving in October Banquet - October 25 Community Band is willing to perform. II Potluck Dinner - April 19 Chef Charles - Dessert? Community Center Room is available. II Capannari's - French Movie Night, Bastille Day Would need to find sponsor Lil Floros expressed concern at this idea. Felicien suggested Language Stars Program in Arlington Heights as potential sponsor. Another alternative would be the Library. II Wine Tasting Maura Reschke contacted new wine shop, Vino 100 about wine tasting. They are not scheduled to open until March, but are interested in working with us. III Young Artist Showcase (SCI) New original art Entry Fee - $30 Top 10 displayed at National Convention III Pen Pal Program Nancy Lee, French teacher at Lincoln Junior High is willing to participate - Classroom to Classroom, not individual. Rachel suggested an art exchange for elementary schools. Village of Mount Prospect January 18,2007 Meeting Minutes Page 3 2/5/2007 · Musical composition collaboration with HS and Christopher Beckett, of SEL. · Humanitarian - Wheelchairsfor Peace Judy moved that the following events be consideredfor 2007: · Thanksgiving in October (one more time) · Potluck Dinner (one more time) · Movie Night (if we can find sponsor) · Wine Tasting The motion was seconded by Rachel Toeppen. Irvana moved, seconded by John Korn to add to the motion: Participation in the 4th of July Parade, Winter Parade. The motion, including the amendment passed. Mike Karsen expressed concern that Commission could manage all of these events/programs. Mayor Wilks will explore Young Artist Showcase. Judy moved that the Commission pursue the following Youth Projects: Art Exchange Musical Composition HS Exchange Pen Pal if possible - (difficult to coordinate) Motion passed. Wheelchairs for Peace was table to the next meeting until more information could be obtained. Rachel stated that there was a need for more publicity for the Commission and events. She asked ifthere were more places the brochure could be displayed and made available to the public. She suggested including a tear off in the brochure that people could send in for more information. It was suggested that a press release go out concerning projects for 2007. Rachel announced Sister Cities events in Hoffman Estates for March 2. The event will be held at their Village Hall from 7-9 p.m., the cost was $30. They would be having chefs visiting from their sister city and Harper students would be in attendance as well. Meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Call to Meeting The Mount Prospect Fire Department Foreign Fire Tax Board Regular Meeting Thursday March 15,2007 7:00 PM - Fire Station 13 Agenda I. Call to Order II. Roll Call W. Foehring - Chairman P. Buffalo - Vice Chairman J. Flory - Treasurer T. Huemann - Trustee J. Miller - Secretary III. Officers Reports D Chairman D Treasurer D Secretary reading of the minutes IV. New Business D Submittals Mount Prospect Fire Department Meeting on January 22, 2007 Foreign Fire Tax Board Minutes Date: January 22, 2007 Start Time: 8:45 AM Roll Call: Name: Present Name: Present Willie Foehring - Chairman Yes Phil Buffalo - Vice Chairman Yes Jim Flory - Treasurer No Tony Huemann - Trustee Yes Jim Miller - Secretary Yes Officers Reports: Chairman Report: N/A Vice Chairman Report: N/A Treasurer Report: N/A New Business: . Submittal by Ron Redlin for ten SCBA buddy breathing quick connections at a cost of $4900. Deputy Chief Malcolm said that this was the first time he heard of the request and he would work with Lt. Wojtkiewicz to purchase the hoses. Motion to return the submittal with no action was made by Huemann and second by Buffalo. Vote: (Yes - 4 - No - 0) . All new submittals will also be given to the Fire Chief and the Deputy Chief so they might be able to address any questions during the FFTB meetings. Voting: . Open positions to include: Lieutenant - Battalion Chief - Non-sworn member All of the above positions went un-opposed and all current Board members will continue to serve on the Board. 1 A conflict was discovered regarding the bond for the Treasurer position and a new Board member must move into that position. BIC Huemann offered to take the responsibility of Treasurer. Motion was made to accept BIC Huemann and accepted by M. Ghawaly and second by DIC Malcolm. Motion was passed to switch BIC Huemann as the Treasurer and Lt. Flory as the Trustee. Change Village Ordinance 5511 - Section 16.106 - B: . Discussion regarding the Ordinance regarding how the funds from the Foreign Fire Tax be used and what can be purchased. Explanation by DIC Malcolm on how the FFTB works within the Village and the Fire Chief. The goal of the change is to meet the intent of the FFTB and to clear up the verbiage. . Current Ordinance states: "food or beverages or for any recreational or entertainment activities". . Proposed change: "for parties or alcoholic beverages or for any activity deemed in appropriate by the Foreign Fire Tax Board". A motion was made to propose the change to the Fire Chief and to the Village was made and accepted by P. Buffalo and second by BIC Huemann. Meeting was adjourned at 9:30 am. . Future meeting dates: March 15, 2007 @ 7:00 PM May 25, 2007 @ 8:30 AM September 27, 2007 @ 7:00 PM November 12, 2007 @ 8:30 PM 2