Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1502_001. .... . ...... -- — --------- -- . ..... . .. ............ - — ------ . . . ....... . . . . ...... 10 /ggp p'a I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tcT TIME mwl&RLY'0ftTAr% P'LE'ASE" Nu` TE EA COMMITTEE F THE WHOLE A GE N DA MINUTE$ COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE NOVEMBER 141 1995 AMA ,L * I - N, 1996 BUDGETIDISCUSSION Mayor Gerald Fadey provided general opening remarks stating that this is the second of thr'66'C6mmitte'e of the Whole Budget Hearings leading up to the eventual approvallofthe 1996 Village Budget. 01 77 "1- 1� '1019 "1. tj Chief Pavlock provided, a general overview of the I Police Department Budget stating a projected annual increase of 6'.3% is illustrated in the Budget document. He stated that the increases in the personnel costs are primarily due to the full cost of the additional OfficeM W which have been added to the Department over the last, couple of years. Furthermore, the Department is currently in the process of testing to establi sh a new Police Officer hiring list. He stated that some of the more creative programs which have b I een implemented over the previous fiscal year have shown somesuccess. in exp anding theCommunity Policing effort of the Department. r- • ol • 0 0 ♦ 4 0 0 0• • "'I ILI 1 0 IVA LS I:*- I go I I iq -11111111111 1111111 11111F 111111111MI I 3 W ••• W ip IF VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCE DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ITO .0 Mayor and Village Board of Trustees FROM,-* Finance Commission DATE,,, November 21, 1995 SUBJECT:, 1996 Budget Recommendations The, Finance Commission met on October 19, November 2, and November 16, 1995 for the purpose of reviewing and discussing the proposed 1996 Village Budget. The reviews consisted of a presentation by each departmental or divisional director and his/her appropriate staff along with questions and discussion by the Finance Commission. At a separate meeting on November 20, 1995, the Finance Commission reviewed the entire budget to identify areas of concern and to formulate their recommendations to the Village Board. The Finance Commission supported the proposed 1996 Budget with one exception. The .ex ception concerned the $1,000,000 appropriiiated, in 1996 and a second $1,000,000 forecast for 1997 for the renovation of Village Hall. The basis of the concern was the belief that monies should not be appropriated until all of the options were thoroughly investigatged. The fbl[lowmig general questions about the proposed project were expressed by the Finance Commission: 1. Does the Village Hall property have more value as part of a redevelopment project than as the Village Hall? 2. Has the Village explored the availability of other existing buildings that may be used as Village Hall? Has the Village consideredthe cost of a new building compared to remodeling the existing building? 3. Has the Village considered leasing for a Village Hall rather than renovating 0 . the existing structure or acquiring another location? 4. If the existing building is renovated, will the building meet the Village's needs for the foreseeable future? 5. Is a complete renovation required or can the project be limited to the major components, i.e. heating and air conditioning? 6. Is the Village Hall worth a $2 million investment? Mayor and Village Board of Trustees Page 2 1996 Budget Recommendations Because of the number of questions that were raised, the Finance Commission recommends that the Village thoroughly investigate the various options before funds are included in the budget for the renovation project. Accordingly, the Finance Commission recommends that the $1,000,000 included on page 241 (Village Hall Improvement) be reduced to an amount that would cover the necessary services to provide more definitive information. The recommendation was approved, by an 8 - 1 vote. A second concern of the Finance Commission is the ever increasing cost of the Village's medical insurance plan. The Village's overall costs for this program have increased from $4,300 per employee in the 91/92 fiscal year to an expected $6,350 in 1996. The Finance Commission recommends that 1 0 an mdepend,en,t evaluation be undertaken of the Village's Medical Insurance Plan comparing the Village's Plan with the plans of other similar municipalities and the private sector. The vote to support this recommendation was 9 - 0. During the discussions with several departments, it was noted that the replacement cost of Village vehicles and equipment is one of the largest expenditures requested. The Finance Commission recommends that the Village evaluate the criteria used to make decisions for replacing vehicles and equipment and to document these criteria for various types of vehicles and equipment. The vote for this recommendation was 9 - 0. Wtly, the Finance Commission is concerned over the magnitude of infrastructure (streets, sewers, water system, sidewalks, etc) needs of the Village and the possible funding for these projects. The Finance Commission recommends that the Village establish a formal five-year Capital Improvement Program to establish a priority for these projects as well as identifying the possible sources for funding these projects. The vote for this recommendation was 9 - 0. In each of the above recommendations, the Finance Commission expressed their desire to assist the Village Board and the Village Staff in any way they can to help implement these recommendations. The Finance Commission also expressed their opinion that the Village is well managed and that, except as mentioned above, the 1996 Budget is a reasonable fiscal plan for the Village for 1996. Special mention was made of the outstanding work of each Village department and the quality of work that was done by the Village Manager and the Finance Department in preparing the 1996 Budget. Respectfully Submitted Richard A. Bachhuber Finance Commission Chairman VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCE DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael E. lanonis, Village Manager FROM: David C. Jepson, FinanceDui=tor DATE: November 22, 1995 SUBJECT: 1996 Budget Less Interfund Transactions Trustee Clowes requested a schedule which eliminates interfund transfers or payments from one fund to another fund which results in a duplication of expenditures in the proposed 1996 "Budget. Interfund transactions generally occur for the following purposes: 1. An "interfund transfer" is a direct payment from one fund to another fund for the purpose of financing expenditures in the fund that receives the transfer. A typical example of an interfund transfer is a transfer of certain monies from a bond proceeds fund to the related debt service fund to finance the principal and interest payments of the bond issue. Over the past several years, we have "transferred" interest income in the bond proceeds fund to the related debt service fund to help pay the first year's debt service. A transaction similar to an interfund transfer is a transfer of pension contributions to the Police and Fire Pension Funds from the General Fund. The only difference is that the receipt of the transfer is recorded as a contribution rather than a transfer. 2. On certain occasions, one fund will make an expenditure that will be reimbursed from another fund in a future fiscal year. An example of this type of reimbursement is when the General Fund provided the "seed" money for the Downtown Redevelopment Project. If monies become available in the Downtown Redevelopment Fund in the future, a reimbursement could be made to the General Fund. 3. Another type of reimbursement occurs when an enterprise fund (Water Fund or Parking Fund) reimburses the General Fund for certain overhead charges. An enterprise fund is accounted for on a basis that is similar to like businesses in the private sector. As a result, overhead charges are a proper expense of the enterprise fund, but the result is a duplication of expenditures in the budget. 4. A payment from an operating fund to an internal service fund is another type of reimbursement and results in a duplicate expenditure in the budget. An internal service fund provides a "service" to Village operating departments similar to a service provided from an independent business. For example, the Police Department pays a medical insurance premium to the Risk Management Fund (an internal service fund) rather than Michael -I- ichael E. Janonis Page 2 1996 Budget Less Interfund Transactions making payments to an insurance company. Because the Village is self-insured, the Risk Management Fund is like the Village's insurance company. The Risk Management Fund includes expenditures for claims, excess insurance coverage and claims administration. As a result the Village has the cost of the "premium" in each operating department in the budget, but then it also has the costs of the "insurance company" in the internal service fund. The result is a duplication of expenditures. The same principle applies in the Vehicle Maintenance Fund and the Vehicle Replacement Fund. The attached schedule shows the amounts included in the proposed 1996 Budget by Fund Groups, i.e. General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Debt Service Funds, etc. compared to actual expenditures for 1994/95, along with the annualized percentage increase. Funds are organized into Fund Groups to identify the purpose for which the funds were established. Interfund transactions are then subtracted to arrive at the net totals for the Fund Group, again with the annualized percentage increase. The increase for the General Fund before the Pension Fund Transfers was 4.96% and after the transfer is subtracted the increase is 4.47%. The annualized percentage increase for some Fund Groups is actually higher after the adjustments as indicated for the Capital Projects Funds (15.03 % before the adjustments and 16.45 % after the adjustment). The most dramatic change is in the Internal Service Funds which change from 22.48% higher to just 0.65% higher. The overall 1996 Budget is 8.46% higher than 1994/95 before the adjustments and 6.99% after the adjustments. This schedule points out that the actual annual spending increase for all Village Funds for 1996 over 1994/95 is 6.99%. However, I think. it also shows that there are wide variations between the Fund Groups, and that it is more relevant to evaluate percentage changes based on the Fund Group rather than on overall Village totals. My reason for this statement is because certain of the Fund Groups can change dramatically from one year to the next based on the purpose of the fund. In a year where there are decreases, the overall total could show a decrease whereas the operating funds actually show an increase. Accordingly, I believe comparing the net change in the General Fund or the Special Revenue Funds provides a more accurate picture in the change from year to year- FiTe-JUT171 Enc VILLAGE OF "MOUNT PROSPECT 1996 BUDGET SUMMARY Proposed Budget Amounts Less interfund Transactions General Fund - Budget Amounts Less: Pension Fund Transfers General Fund Net Budget Special Revenue Funds - Budget Amounts Debt Service Funds - Budget Amounts Capital Projects Funds - Budget Amounts Less: General Fund Reimbursement Transfer to Debt Service Funds Capital Projects Net Budget Enterprise Funds - Budget Amounts Less: General Fund Service Charges Enterprise Funds Net Budget Internal Service Funds - Budget Amounts Less: General Fund Charges Special Revenue Funds Charges Enterprise Funds Charges Internal Service Net Budget Pension Funds - Budget Amounts All Funds Totals - 1996 Budget Amounts Totals - Interfund Transactions 1996 Net Budget Totals $4295662523 $4825692165 8.46% Annualized 1994/95 1996 Percentage Actual Budget Increase $203,080,700 $215,740,550 4.96% (549, 655)(7533,500) $193,5315,045 $203,9875,050 4.47% $451109,737 $45,3693,770 3.80% $23,935,205 $374345,510 10.21% $4,042,136 $5,0541,500 15.03% - (1043,300) (2062000) (621,500) $33,8362136 $428872700 16.45% $6,2629558 $7,2231595 9.21% . (2872500) (306v000) $53,9751,058 $63,9179595 9.46% $3,544,059 $43,8717720 22.48% (2;,449;350) (31,3763,100) (53,300) (20,200) (4691,850) (8491,100)_ $ 6191,559 $ 5263,320 0.65% $1,592,128 $198743,520 10.64% $4295662523 $4825692165 8.46% (32967,655) (53,471.,700) $38,5982868 $43.,097,465 6.99% I CO to QLdu The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. Commission Members present included Chairman Richard Bachhuber, and Commission Members Joe Etchingham, Newt Hallman, Jim Morrison and Ann Smilanic. Also present were Village Manager Michael lanonis, Finance Director David Jepson, Assistant Finance Director Carol Widmer, Public Works Director Glen Andler, and Deputy Public Works Director Sean Dorsey. Commission member Tom Pekras and one resident arrived at 7:25 p.m. Commission members John Engel, Vince Grochocinski and Frank Wolfinger were absent. The minutes of November 2, 1995 were accepted as presented. WIN 1=4 4713062 - 11�� I Z MI W M liflTM-of MIN �11111111 V21P 1 1 1 1 1 to 111 0 : ' I TWOMMY Public Works Director Glen Andler presented the proposed 1996 Public Works Department budget of $14,947,335. As he began his remarks, Mr. Andler mentioned several noteworthy accomplish- ments of the Department that were achieved in 1995. During the year the Forestry Division received the Tree City USA Award for the 11th consecutive year as well as national accreditation from the Society of Municipal Arboxists. Mount Prospect is one of only eight cities *in the country to receive this accreditation. Also, a total of 13.3 miles of Village roads were totally reconstructed or resurfaced and the first phase of a three-phase project to replace all of the water ms in the Lake Briarwood area was completed. The Public Works Department consists of five divisions: Streets, Forestry, Engineering, Water and Sewer, and Vehicle Maintenance. In the Streets Division the 1996 proposed funding of $1,708,575 represents no significant changes. Projects such as inlet cleaning, storm sewer repairs, pavement marldmg and crack filling will continue at the same level as prior years. TheForestry Division has a 1996 proposed budget of $829,035. Included in the budget is $7,500 for a continuation of the Tree Hazard Identification Program. This program has proven very injury successful M* detectina decaying trees and limbs and removing them before they cause miury or %W damage. In conjunction with the tree hazard identification program, the Division is requesting $15,000 for contractual tree removal services i 111 11,11 Milli NO Jepson briefly reviewed the non -departmental budgets beginning with Community and Civic %W Services. The proposed 1996 Budget of $181,120 includes $47,600 for Community groups, $76,200 for the 4th of July and Civic Events and $57,320 for Holiday Decorations. The Capital Improvement Projects proposed budget for 1996 is $7,254,620 and includes Village improvements, flood control projects, motor equipment replacement and other construction projects. Many of these projects and purchases were discussed during departmental presentations. In 1996 the total amount budgeted for debt service is $3,434,510. Mr. Jepson explained that the Village pays for the outstanding debt in five ways: property tax, 1/4 home rule sales tax for flood projects, 1/40 home rule sales tax for street repairs, water revenues and special service areas. The pension fund portion of the budget reflects pension and disability payments that are made from three Village admini-stered pension plans. They are the Police and Fire Pension Funds and payments to three retired firefighters who were members of the Forest River Fire Protection District when the Village took over the District in 1970. Under 'insurance and contingencies, casualty and property 'insurance is budgeted at $610,050. This represents a decreaw of $101,694 from 1994/95 to 1996. However, the Medical Insurance Program is expected to increase from $1,952,059 in 1994/95 to $2,448,,900 in 1996, an -increase of 15.3%. Mr. Jepson noted that the increase in medical *insurance costs continues to be an area of great concern. The members of the Finance Commission discussed how to address the significant issues in the proposed 1996 budget. The consensus of the members was to address longer term issues as well as the current budget. Some of the issues identified were medical insurance costs., the proposed renovation of Village Hall, a long-term solution to funding capital improvements and a Plan to formalize the decision-maldng process in determining when to replace vehicles and other equipment. It was decided that another meeting would be held on Monday, November 20 in order to allow all Coranfission members an opportunity to make recommendations on the budget and the larger issues facing the Village. The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. The next meeting will be held at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, November 20, 1995. Respectfully submitted Carol L. Widmer, Assistant Finance Director 3