Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1440_001
Next Ordinance No. 4703 Next Resolution No. 4-95 POW d A Meeting Location: Mount Prospect Senior Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 11. TOLL CALL DEPUTY VILLAGE CLERK VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ORDER OF BUSINESS REGULAR MEETING Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday February 7, 1995 7:30 P. M. Mayor Gerald '"Sidp" Farley Trustee George Clowes Tnt a Paul Hoefert Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowro►n Trustee Richard Hendricks Trustee Irvana Wilks ALL 111. INVOCATION - Mayor Farley IV. APPROVE MINUTES CIT REGULAR MEETING, January 17, 1995 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS VI. MAYOR'S REPORT A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance creates a Class "S" liquor license for Marlon's 11, a restaurant that will occupy the space formerly used by Swenson's Ice Cream Parlor and more recently AI's Diner in the Colony Shopping Center at Oakton & Elmhurst Road (Exhibit A) B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance deletes the Class "R" currently held by Edwardo's at 1904 S. Elmhurst Road and creates a Class "S" license for the new restaurant to be known as Pop's Grill and Bar. (Enhibit B) C. Request from the prospective owners of Mt. Prospect Liquors, 16 North Main Street, to continue doing business under the existing Class "C" liquor license. D. 62nd U. S. Conference of Mayor's Report T. Appointments NOTE.* ANY INDIVIDUAL MIO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 900 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, MOUNT PROSPECT, 7081392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD 7081392-6064. VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance establishes regulations governing Recall. (Exhibit C) B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 ENTITLED "LICENSES AND PERMITS" OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance establishes requirements that all outstanding items, such as payment of fines, penalties, legal action, etc. must be up-to-date in order to obtain a license from the Village. (Exhibit D) IX. NEW BUSINESS A. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONSOLIDATED PLAN INCLUDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1995 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM (Exhibit E) B. Safety Commission recommendations: 1. Request for parking restrictions on Midway Drive The Safety Commission recommended parking be prohibited on the south side of Midway Drive by a vote of 7-0. 2. Request for STOP sign on Cardinal Lane at Eric. The Safety Commission recommended a YIELD sign rather that STOP sign by a vote of 7-0. C. ZBA 1-A-95 and ZBA 2-Z-95, Text and Zoning Amendments The Village, as Petitioner, is proposing text amendments to Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) relative to the Central Business District zoning and to rezone properties located within the designated Central Business District to the B-5 and B -5C zoning classifications. In addition, there are various text amendments proposed that are not related to the B-5 District. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the text amendments by a vote of 6-1 and amending the official zoning map by a vote of 7-0. D. Amend Comprehensive Plan k In accordance with the establishment of the Central Business rya District zoning, by a vote of 5-1 with one abstention, it was the recommendation of the Plan Commission that the Official Comprehensive Plan/Generalized Land Use Map be amended to reflect these changes. E. Whispering Creek Subdivision (Semar) I 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE WHISPERING CREEK SUBDIVISION This Ordinance grants a modification to allow a 4:1 stormwater detention facility side slope and to allow a structure within 2�5 feet of a stormwater facility. The Plan Commission recommended granting these requests by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit F) 2. Whispering Creek Final Plat of Subdivision The Plan Commission recommended approving this subdivision, providing for the development of 15 single family homes by a vote of 5-0. F., Accept improvements installed in conjunction with the Evergreen tt Woods Townhomes located on Golf Road. X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S► REPORT A. Bid result: 1. Linneman Road improvements 2. Tree Removal B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (LINNEMAN ROAD) X, This Ordinance authorizes the Village to purchase property to be used for public right-of-way in conjunction with the Linneman Road improvement. (Exhibit G) C. Status Report X1. TRUSTEE COMMENTS XII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS X1111. ADJOURNMENT 3 El MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR ' BOARD - OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT •• JANUARY 17, 1995 i CALL TO ORDER • ORDER Mayor Farley called - meeting to order ROLL CALL Present .• • • • Farley Trustee George TimothyTrustee • • Trustee Richard Hendricks Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Irvana Wilks INVOCATION The invocation APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to APPROVE approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor MINUTES • Board of • January 3, 1995. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, None Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to APPROVE approve the following list of bills: BILLS GeneralTrustee • • ,727 •. - Refuse Disposal Fund 80,920 Mo• 51875 CommunityDevelopment • Water & Sewer • 130,610 System Revenue Fund 61384 ManagementParking Risk • 165,487 Vehicle Replacement Fund 32,646 Capital Improvement F• 24,448 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 79007 Police • Const. Flood Control Construction• EPA Flood Loan Construction Fund Street Improvement • • • 159782 Debt Service• • Flexcomp Trust Fund 59138 EscrowDeposit Fund 39j605 Police Pension Fund 00W Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit • • roll call: ' • Corcoran, .c • w Skowron, Wilks None Motion carried. FINANCIAL REPORT Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to accept the financial report for the month of December, 1994, subject to audit. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Bkawron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. `AYOWS REPORT PRESENTATION.* Mayor Farley, along with Linda Hoefert and Rev. fucker of the HOLIDAY DECORATION Holiday Decoration Committee, presented the following winners of CONTEST WINNERS the 1994 Holiday Decoration Contest with plaques: ate y W Business Northwest Travel 1 st Place Mrs.P & Me 2nd Place Whole Block 700 & 800 Block of West Milburn Anne Hull, 805 W. Milburn) Multi -family Westgate Apartments (Diane Wuinard) Religious Bernard & Susan Junokas 1st Place 813 N. Wille Carmen &Vickie Murillo 2nd Place Whole House Bob Zimba 1 st Place 15014 E. Barberry Edward Janak 2nd Place 902 Ironwood Whimsical Devin Urou inkel 1 st Place 212 N. Cowen David 'Brill 2nd Place 215 N. Russel AMEND CH. 13 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would create a MARLON, II Class "B" liquor license for Marlon's 11, a restaurant that will CLASS "" occupy the space formerly used by wenson's Ice Cream Parlor, and more recently Al's Coiner, located in the Colony Shopping Center at Elmhurst Road and Oakton ,Street. This Ordinance will be presented at the neat regular meeting of the Village Board on February 7, 1995. AMEND CH. 13 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would delete DELETED "R" - the Class "R" liquor license currently held by Edwardo's at 1904 Page 2 - January 17, 1995 This Ordinance will be presented at the next regular meeting of the Village Board on February 7, 1995. Mayor Farley presented June Richards, 1412 S. Hickory, and APPOINTMENT: recommended the Board concur in appointing Mrs. Richards JUNE RICHARDS, to the Plan Commission filling the vacancy created by the PLAN COMM. resignation of Don Weibel, term to expire May, 1997. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clewes, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Mayor to appoint June Richards to the Plan Commission, term to expire in May, 1997. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clewes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. COWUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Louie Velasco, 202 North Louis Street, expressed concern about the 200 BLOCK customers of Louis Anthony's Beauty Shop parking on this block OF NORTH LOUIS noting that it is a half width street and the parking makes it PARKING ,tifficult for residents. Members of the Board stated that the beauty shop is successful and apparently has more employees and customers than parking spaces. It was noted that the Village Board will, as part of the annual budget process, consider widening Louis Street which would alleviate some of the concerns of the residents on that street. Mr. Valesco, was assured the Village would continue to seek a solution to this problem. OLD BUSINESS An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would amend AMEND CH. 18 the Traffic Code to authorize a STOP sign on Wille Street for STOP* WILLE north and southbound traffic at Thayer Street. AT THAYER Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes. Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: Hendricks Motion carried. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for passage ORD.NO. 4700 of Ordinance No. 4700 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: Henddcks Page 3 - January 17, 1995 RECALL The 2nd reeding of an Ordinance establishing procedures for the recall of elected official was deferred until the meeting on February 7th in order to obtain additional legal opinions from the Illinois Municipal League. NEW BUSINESS ,SELL PROPERTY An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would authorize TURN -OUT GEAR the sale of certain tum -out dear, protective outer wear, used b the Fire Department which is not longer needed. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call, Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks s Nays: Hendricks Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4701 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of ordnance No. 4701 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE Upon roll call.* Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays. None Motion carried. AMEND CH. 10 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would amend LICENSES/PERMITS Chapter 10 of the Village Code to establish requirements that all outstanding items, such as payment of fines, penalties, legal action, delinquent water bills, etc. must be satisfied prior to a license being issued by the Village. 11 This Ordinance, will be presented at the next regular meeting of the Village Board on February 7th in order to give the Chamber of Commerce an opportunity to determine what, if any, effect this Ordinance would have on members of the Chamber. AMEND CH. 25 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would amend Chapter 25 to elaborate on the often used phrases throughout the Code under Construction of Wards, including "person, firm or corporation". Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: Clowes, Hendricks, Motion carried. w Page 4 - January 17, 1995 a Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage ORD.NO. 470 of Ordinance No. 4702 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 25 OF;THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowr6n, Wilks Nays: Hendricks I Members of the Board expressed their opinions and disappointment with the actions of Trustee Hendricks. Trustee Hendricks made a presentation in defense of the allegation that he identified himself as a police officer in another town, however, he did say that he does identify himself as a Trustee when dealing with people both in and out of the Village of Mount Prospect. Trustee Hendricks also stated that State and Local laws state that the Mayor and Trustees are conservators of the Peace and have authority to arrest in certain situations. Mr. & Mrs. Anda, 4 Jerry Drive and Ernest Lasse, 805 S. Elm, expressed support for the proposed Resolution. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for passage RES. NO. 1-95 of Resolution 1-95 Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Farley Nays: Hendricks Motion carried. Mayor Farley stated that staff would review the Village Code relative to the authority given elected officials and make recommendations as to possible amendments to the Code. Page 5 - January 17, 1995 Trustee Howes left the meeting for a brief peniod. VILLAGE MANAGERS REPORT BID: SENIOR CENTER Village Manager Michael E. Janonis presented the following bid REMODEL PUBLIC results for remodeling the public restroom facilities in the Senior BATHROOMS Citizen Center and bringing those facilities into compliance with the requirements of the ADA. Bidder Amount The Dubb's Company $361821 R. J. Ridolfi $48,400 Kabayama $49,200 Bishop PIumbing $54,430 L & M B rs $541468 Kandu 6i6others $691000 COMPANY Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur wth the recommendation of the administration and accept the low qualifiedl�d submitted by The Dub bs Company in an amount not to exceed 1 *,821 for remodeling i restrooms on the first floor in the Senior Citizen Center. Upon roll, call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ACQUIRE ROW An Ordinance was presented that' would authorize the Village to for the purpose of public right-of-way on LINNEMAN ROAD acquire certain Prop IMPROVEMENT Linnema h Road. This Ordinance will be presented at the next regular meeting of the Villio , Board on February 7th for 2nd reading. I MITI I I I apmi W�& COW I Uffel a MW A ,RESOLUTION,,,-PROVIDI,NG FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE RETIREES MEDICAL BENEFIT PROGRAM TO CERTAIN EMPLOYEES Upon rol[ call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ICMA TRUST A Resolution was presented that would authorize establishing a retirement Trust with the ICMA (thternational City Managers Association). This Trust is in conjunction with an employment agreement with Police Chief Pavlock. Page 6 - January 17, 1995 El a Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of RES.NO. 3-§5 Resolution No. 3-95 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ♦ MONEY PURCHASE RETIREMENT PLAN WITH THE INTERNATIONAL diTy MANAGERS' ASSOCIATION (ICMA) RETIREMENT TRUST Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None TRUSTEE COMMENTS Trustee Hendricks asked that the subject of a K-9 (Canine) unit be K-9 UNIT placed on the agenda for a future Committee of the Whole meeting. Members of the Board expressed support for this suggestion. Trustee Clowes returned to the meeting at this point. Trustee Cloves asked for copies of the -1-1 tapes from Glenview that were referenced earlier in the meeting as it applied to the admonishment of Trustee Hendricks. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 9:55 P.M. M -1021M ARTICLE XIX B-5 CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT SECTION-, n 14,1901. Purpose Statement 13, 14.1902. Conditions of Use 14,1903, Permitted Uses 14.1904. Conditional Uses 14.1905, Bulk Regulations VEIB 1995 Sec, 14.1901. Purpose Statement The B-5 Central Commercial District 'includes the "downtown Core" area, as designated on the Zoning Map, and related retail and commercial areas along Northwest Highway. Specific bulk regulations are included for each of these areas. The District is intended to accommodate retail and specialty shops, and business, professional, and civic uses characteristic of a traditional downtown area. The "Core" area also permits highler density multa-ifkmily residential uses for the purpose, of provi*,dm*g, a downtown living environment. Special attention is focused on uses With an emphasis on consumer goods and services easily accessible by pedestrians, professional, and governmental offices and other non -sales tax generating uses are permitted in the downtown core area. However, such uses should be encouraged to be located at the periphery of this area. The primary focus of the downtown core area is to attract high levels of pedestrian activity for retail, service, and specialty shops. In tion, the B-5 District has been designated as an "area of critical concern" due to heavy traffic movement, intensity of development, and its essential role in the future development of the Village. Sec. 14.1902. Conditions of Use A. Uses allowed in the B-5 District are subject to the following conditions: 1. All business, servicing, processing, and storage shall be conducted within completely enclosed buildings. 2. No manufacturing or assembling shall be permitted except as incidental to the business occupying the premises. Sec. 14.1903. Permitted Uses A. Any use permitted in the B-3 Community Shopping District plus the following uses: 1. Dwelling units, located above the first floor 2. Hotels and motels 3. Offices, including business, professional, non-profit and governmental. offices 4. Ac66ssoq uses and buildings, incidental to and on the same zoning lot as the permitted use. Sec. 14.1904. Conditional Uses 1. Amusement establishments, including but not limited to bowling alleys, pool hallIs, smnimnuing pools, skating rinks f . h'rv,r' r ' WINr. I'm 4. Automobile repair and service stations. 5. Automobile sales, new or used. 6. Car wash. 7. Catering services. 8. Convention and exhibition halls. 1. 9*4` 111171011 1, 1 1111,11110 -PI; 10. Dwelling units on ground floor. 11. Funeral homes. 12. Game Rooms. 13. Outside display and sales of products the sale of which is a permitted or conditional use in this District. 14. Outside service areas for other permitted or conditional uses in this District. 15. Parking lots or structures, commercial. 16. Public utilities and services. 17. Radio and television stations, studios and towers. 18. Recreation and community centers, commercial. 19. Transportation depots. 20. Accessory uses and buildings, incidental to and on the same zoning lot as the Conditional Use. 21. Other uses similar to the above uses, as determined appropriate by the Director of Planning, and not listed in any other zoning classification. 22. Planned Unit Developments, mixed commercial and residential. 23. Antenna Towers, ground -mounted, exceeding seventy (70) feet in height. Sec. 14.1905. Bulk Regulations A. Maximum Density B. M 1. There shall be a maximum density of sixteen (16) units per acre. 2. The maximum density in the "Core" area shall be thirty (30) units per acre. Minimum Building Setbacks No setbacks shall be required for principal buildings in the B-5 District unless r accessory structures shall conform to e. Height Limitations L There shall be a maximum height of three (3) stories or thirty feet, whichever is less. 2. The maximum height in the "Core" area shall be six (6) stories or seventy (70) feet, whichever is less. D. Minimum Open Space and Landscaping There shall be no requirement for minimum open space for uses in the B-5 District. However, screening and perimeter landscaping requirements are required and regulated by the Landscape Regulations contained in' Section 14.2301 of this Chapter. E. Restrictions on Business Uses All business activities, servicing, processing, and storage, except for off-street parking or loading, shall be conducted within completely enclosed buildings; except that outside display and sales, outside service areas,, and drive-through/drive-m' services may be allowed regulated by this ordinance. F Transitional Setbacks # 0 W Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM I very much dislike the necessity of having to write this memorandum. However, recent actions by one of our fellow Board members has created, in my opinion, the need to do so. In less than one week's time, I received a call from the Mayor of Des Plaines (followed by a letter); a letter from the Pastor of the Cumberland Baptist Church (on Central Road) and had a personal conversation with the Village Manager of Hoffman Estates; all concerning the actions of Mount Prospect Village Trustee Richard N. Hendricks. The actions alleged in these most recent contacts as well as a number of other "incidents" leads me to the conclusion that a clear pattern of inappropriate conduct on the part of Trustee Hendricks has been established. I believe his actions outside of Board meetings cannot and should not continue to be ignored. His activities both within the Village and outside of our boundaries not only cast the Village Board and administration in a bad light but also open this Village up to the real possibility of legal liability. Based upon the reasons enumerated below, I am seeking your support for a Resolution of Admonishment of Trustee Hendricks. His continued refusal to follow established protocol covering contacts with staff including demands for "drop-in" meetings, information gathering, investigations, enforcement of his personal "pet -peeves," etc. The attached memorandum clearly established the proper protocol and spelled out appropriate lines of communication. I also question the legitimacy of his use of Village fax machines, photocopiers and telephones all well beyond the needs of all remaining Trustees collectively. TO: BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: MAYOR GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLEY DATE: JANUARY 10, 1995 SUBJECT: TRUSTEE RICHARD N. HENDRICKS I very much dislike the necessity of having to write this memorandum. However, recent actions by one of our fellow Board members has created, in my opinion, the need to do so. In less than one week's time, I received a call from the Mayor of Des Plaines (followed by a letter); a letter from the Pastor of the Cumberland Baptist Church (on Central Road) and had a personal conversation with the Village Manager of Hoffman Estates; all concerning the actions of Mount Prospect Village Trustee Richard N. Hendricks. The actions alleged in these most recent contacts as well as a number of other "incidents" leads me to the conclusion that a clear pattern of inappropriate conduct on the part of Trustee Hendricks has been established. I believe his actions outside of Board meetings cannot and should not continue to be ignored. His activities both within the Village and outside of our boundaries not only cast the Village Board and administration in a bad light but also open this Village up to the real possibility of legal liability. Based upon the reasons enumerated below, I am seeking your support for a Resolution of Admonishment of Trustee Hendricks. His continued refusal to follow established protocol covering contacts with staff including demands for "drop-in" meetings, information gathering, investigations, enforcement of his personal "pet -peeves," etc. The attached memorandum clearly established the proper protocol and spelled out appropriate lines of communication. I also question the legitimacy of his use of Village fax machines, photocopiers and telephones all well beyond the needs of all remaining Trustees collectively. 2. His abuse of the Police Ride -Along Program both in his frequency of use and the apparent purpose of riding along. The program was intended to provide a general understanding of patrol operations and not become an on-going training program. The program was also never intended to be a vehicle for identifying Zoning violations as Trustee Hendricks has stated publicly that that is what he uses it for. Attached is the Village Manager's reasons for restricting Trustee Hendricks' access to the Police Ride -Along Program. 3. His continued harassment of Mount Prospect residents, particularly his neighbors, in his zeal to enforce Village Codes per his interpretation. Violation or not, the tactics employed by Trustee Hendricks will quite likely result in some type of harassment suit being filed against the Village and the Board. The attached letter from the senior Pastor of the Cumberland Baptist Church is particularly troubling. The memorandum from Chief Pavlock should serve all of us as a warning of what might happen if we, as a Board, do not take appropriate actions to correct this situation. 4. The unauthorized "flashing" of his Trustee's Badge in a number of very questionable circumstances. The badge, which is no longer issued, was intended only as a ceremonial form of identification. Trustee Hendricks has used the badge, which he received during his initial term of office, at the Mount Prospect Police Station, the Courthouse in Rolling Meadows and a trailer park in Glenview. The attached Glenview Police Report highlights a situation that expose's this Village to serious potential for liability! 5. Misuse of his Trustee's title and apparent authority by calling upon businesses in the City of Des Plaines and demanding compliance with his interpretation of Des Plaines' Codes. He further sought to interject himself in Des Plaines matters by requesting copies of all correspondence - presumably so that he could follow-up on matters. Mayor Sherwood's letter is attached. 6. His request of the Village of Hoffman Estates to allow him to accompany one of their sworn Officers on a Hoffman Estates "ride -a -long" thereby exposing both the Village of Mount Prospect and Hoffman Estates, individually and collectively, to significant potential liability in the event of an accident or unfortunate police action. I believe it would have been appropriate to inform our Board of his intentions since his request was made in his capacity as Trustee. I recognize, as I am certain you also do, the seriousness of a Resolution of Admonishment. I have hoped and prayed that Trustee Hendricks over the past year would begin to approach his responsibilities with greater caring and understanding, greater flexibility and graciousness, greater compromise and concern for those he seeks to serve, those with whom he must work and those who must deliver the services this Village provides. I had also hoped that he would exercise better discretion and judgment in the manner he uses his position as Trustee. All of this, in my estimation, has not come to pass. To permit Trustee Hendricks to continue his method of service to this community, and now apparently beyond our borders, without strong repudiation, serves to leave the impression that we condone his actions and conduct and, as a result, places the Board in an untenable position should a lawsuit be brought. I do not believe,the Board supports his actions and the time has come to express to the members of our community and beyond that we do not. I have endeavored to talk with Trustee Hendricks regarding several of these matters, although not each one, and such conversations have been pointless. Trustee Hendricks apparently believes rules and procedures exist for the rest of us and that he is free to establish his own rules. My final effort in reaching Trustee Hendricks and seeking his cooperation in ceasing conduct and actions that place this Board and community at risk is through this Resolution. I urge your unqualified support of the attached Resolution of Admonishment. GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLEY GLFftcc C'UMBERLAND BAPTISTCHURCH Honorable Gerald "'Skip" Farley, Mayor December 29, 1994 Village of Mt. Prospect 100 South Emerson Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Mayor Farley, We have only met briefly, so I am sure you won't remember me. I have been a pastor ifs Mt. Prospect for the last five years and have worked with April pril Foley of hoc Services interviewing those in need of assisoltatrice , Both 1, and the church I service, have tried to be responsible citizens and ensure that Mt. Prospect is a better and more beautiful place to live in. However, I need your assistance in dealing with a problem. Twice now my wife has been of reprimanded t1l by a village trustee for violations he felt had been committed by our church. The first incident happened approximately a month ago after the big snow -fall that. dumped six inches. About 8:30 or 9:00 prn., Richard Hendricks,, avillage trusteecarnetoo,ur home demanding my wifecome outside and "take responsibility" fora, tree that "our ,plow" had deposited on -a neighbors lawn. My wife was putting our children to bed and informed him tha,t she had nothing to do with the church plowing service. Nevertheless he insisted in such a combative manner that she' complied. I tr I Sure eno, gh, the 1 now bank along our neighbors curb was a birch ee imb. My wife, expil IVI �ained to r. Hendricks that we had no, birch trees on our property, so itclouldn't have beenour tree. She, also stated that frornthesize of the plow blade markings whichwere tw, Ice the width of the small picku, that plows oj P ur tot, it hadto, be another plow. However, he insisted that we did it. Later I in talking to our neighbors, we discovered that it was, a 11mb from their tree which broke off under the weight of the snow and they had thrown it by their curb. All Mr. Hendricks had to do was ask our neighbors before he came to my wife with his accusations. Both his attitude and his accusations were unnecessary. Last Thursday he stopped by again to tell my wife that we needed to clear the sidewalk on Central Road where our plowing service had pushed snow across the sidewalk. He wascorrect. Our plowing I' - i service did do this, and it needed to be corrected. But again, the man has an attitude problem. He "demanded" that it be removed that afternoon. His forceful attitude upset both my wife and children. My wife suggested that he call the church office or write a letter to which he responded, "No, I don't talk to staff. I go to the headman." 1500 East Centr*al Roa(I - m(mnr Prospect, Illinois H0056 - (708) 2*(4324) 03- Honorable Gerald Farley December 29, 1994 Page 2 harassingMayor Farley, I assure you my wife i's not �yyyy�y y�y y he r • ~ Hendricks # + f e about '''*P problems,, Mry �J A� � most certainly should y, yyyy� 'may � � � coming home about 7P church aW',How would you like people to your ,may + I if ,�IXVn s eMF" • nd M . A 7 a your o V every Nu dY1F time, there � ''d'A a problemi with the A.F MMS. committeeI will talk tothe chairman of our Building, and Grounds .yam y� and ♦ i instruct ','. • plowing 7�I e � o correct Jr sidewalk AfN should n I ofice dM I I� �.N problem, all XYN o come ` church Hendricks office has to i1� JYn' �, dYN. MM community. problem, �r IAl1llll!' XIF' +YMM' „AYA '#F 7r T happy even N�.. Ate' doing, May I is, nothingrespectfully i hat you sk n.' trustee "R 1 bother, am.' yi, y e�� WIF f 1 � r , ,? tha,t she can do, about church related problems, except pass message 4M' 'qll' 4 �r � r the church staff ich ��y� q�, ��yy r I .,i r. is w�A� '71f himself. r 'i 7f...'' .xYYM not my homie or simply call the church w that pe ple would be more, receptive to wouldhim it he try to be more grac" jous and less, combative www espect is eamed, not demanded., you know this, However, I onl'y,,w*sh that this tru I mtee can learn this, basic fact of life as well. Sincerely, Rev. Kirk R. Brantner VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT RICHARD N. HENDRICKS TRUSTEE 100 S. Emerson St, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Phone: 706/392-6000 FAX: 708/392-6022 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION January 31, 1995 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 1/13/95 through Per Attached Journal Balance WORMS RLOUNSWU Swaxam Kunio General Fund $ 2,261,668 $ 865,731 ,928 $ 2,489,471 Refiucse Disposal Fund {274,807} 50,118 r63 ,044 {318,733} Motor Fuel Tax 286,187 75,027 ,516 323,698 ommuni D 1 mC ty eve oP euYt BlocF Grrant {8,031} 22,000 ,715 {19746} Entermise Water & Sewer Fund 21,079,421 2679,750 2649623 2,0829548 Parking System Revenue Fund 4131,354 9,071 806 4219619 Risk Management Fund 195487713 2441,452 15 1, 164 1,642,001 Vehicle Replacement Fund 849,627 921 848,706 is k Capital Improvement Fund 29851,425 2,900 19,869 2,8341,456 Downtown Redev Const Funds {579666} m {571,666} Police & Fire Building Construction 179,874 1,045 1789829 Flood Control Construction Fund 7962714 15,937 780,777 EPA Flood Loan Construction Fund 7,692 79692 Street Improvement Coast Fund 41,553,437 4,5539437 Debt Service Funds 195959602 981,849 500 1,6930951 IMLA-A&M Funds Flexcomp, Trust Fund {21863} 5,642 _ 2,779 Escrow Deposit Fund 7721,725 60,420 629925 770,220 Police Pension Fund 20,164,013 419844 571,351 20,1481,506 Firemen's Pension 23,2330948 53,050 689133 23,2181,865 Benefit Trust Funds 214x238 - 214.238 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION CLEARING ACCOUNTS AUDREY H. BROMBERG CHEVYS...INC, COCA COLA BOTTLING CO. MICHAEL COCO DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT DELORES HAUGH IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE KALE UNIFORMS, INC. KIMBALL HILL INC, WHEI & PETER L. LIN PAUL A. LYTHBERG NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. PAUL MUSICr INC, PENSION DISBURSEMENTS POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM POSTMASTER QUALITY AMUSEMENT MICHAEL ROYSTER SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC* REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL RTN LIQUOR LICENSE FEE DUP PMT VENDING SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES PZR ENDING 1/19Z95 PZR ENDING 1Z19Z95 PZR ENDING 1Z19Z95 PZR ENDING 1/19/95 P7R ENDING I 19Z95 REFUND FEB95 PREMIUM UNIFORM SUPPLIES NUIS ABATEMENT GUARANTEE PROPMTCE GUAR -1737W CHARIOT RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE SAVINGS BONDS P/R 1/19 PMT INS CLAIMS-CRAWFORD PMT INS CLAIMS-CRAWFORD DUE TO FED DEP PZR 119 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 1Z19 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 1449 DUE TO FED DEP P7R 1 - 19 z DUE TO FED DEP PZRI 1 19 DINNER DANCE BAND BAIL DUE JAN POLICE PENSION DISE JAN FIRE PENSION DISB POSTAGE METER ADV DEP US POSTAGE STAMPS DUPLICATE PAYMENT REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL CELESTIAL CELEB FAVORS CELEST.CELEBRATION FAVORS INVOICE AMOUNT $8.10 $.84 $2,500,00 $80.00 $734.00 $481,118.18 $2,449.47 $1,979.23 $46,184.53 $696,22 $50.00 315.00 442.20 $28,039.00 $2,560.56 $680.00 $750.00 8 864,25 506,85 $15,815.60 �164.86 $149.91 $3,493.16 $1,852.92 75.00 $57r350.50 $68,132.90 $3,000.00 $320.00 $220.00 $4.11 $39-60 $36-98 $3.84 $181.85 $1,351.50 PAGE 1 $8.94 $2,500.00 $80.00 $734.00 $532,427-63* $50.00 3 15.0 0 442.20 $28 ,039.00 $2t560.56* $680.00 $2,121.10* $19,676.45* $1,075,00 $125t483.40* $3j000.00* $320.00 $220.00 $84.53 $1,533.35* VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RICHARD N. HENDRICKS NWM CONF-HENDRICKS $20.00 $20.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $10.83 MISC EXPENSES $113.51 $124.34* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS STATE OF ILLINOIS LIQ APP RECORD CK $144.00 LIQ APP RCD CR-PAPPAS $108.00 $252.00* THE TELEMARKETING COMPANY DUPLICATE PAYMENT $20.00 $20.00 THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT BOND MONEY $1,200.00 BOND MONEY $4,360.00 BOND MONEY $875.00 BOND MONEY $4,220.00 BOND MONEY $1,475.00 BOND MONEY $2,770.00 $14,900.00* TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS ENG SVCS-LINNEMAN RD $7,851.92 $7,851.92 V.I.P. AWARDS & ENGRAVING SPECIAL EVENTS $413.50 $413.50 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DISB RESEOR DEPOSIT $5,900.00 DISB DUMPST DEPOSIT $300.00 DISB LANDSCAP GUAR $378.00 DISB SIGN SITE IMPR $450.00 DISB STR OBSTR BOND $4x455.00 DISB DEMO DEPOSIT $500.00 $111983.00* CLEARING ACCOUNTS ***TOTAL** $756,771.58 GENERAL FUND $503,875.98 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $2,614.33 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $2,129.14 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $71851*2 WATER & SEWER FUND $49,771.16 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $749.14 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $1,371.10 POLICE PENSION FUND $57,350.50 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND $68,132.90 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $62,925.41 VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES RICHARD N. HENDRICKS NWM CONF-HENDRICKS $20.00 $20.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $10.83 MISC EXPENSES $113.51 $124.34* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ***TOTAL** $144.34 GENERAL FUND $144.34 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ARNSTEIN & LEHR DEC LEGAL FEES $$5.00 EDWARD CAVELLO CERTIFIED REPORTING COMPANY DAILY HERALD HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER MOUNT PROSPECT ROTARY CLUB NATIONAL PUBLIC EMPLOYER LABOR NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PEDERSEN & HOUPT DEC LEGAL FEES DEC LEGAL FEES DEC LEGAL FEES DEC LEGAL FEES DEC LEGAL FEES - DEC LEGAL FEES DEC LEGAL FEES DEC LEGAL FEES DEC LEGAL FEES DEC LEGAL FEES INAUGURAL CEREMONY SERVICES RENDERED SERVICES RENDERED EMPLOYMENT AD PRE -EMP PHYSICAL -BROWN PRE -EMP PHYSICAL-BUNDICK PRE -EMP PHYSICAL-WALLIN ROTARY DUES -MORGAN 1ST QTR DUES-JANONIS DUES-STRAHL OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES DEC LEGAL SERVICES DEC LEGAL SERVICES DEC LEGAL SERVICES $518.80 $2,533.73 $1807,.50 $415.79 $971.72 - $50.00 1 362.50 20.? 1,637.50 $3t598.46 $ll,i6i.?0 $169.45 $169.45 $138.50 $138.50 $277.00 $44.16 $44.16 $399.00 $159.00 $84.00 $642.00 $178.00 $197.00 $375.00 $165.00 $165.00 $49.05 $84.41 $133.46 $63.75 $13.75 $7.00 GENERAL FUND $16,434.91 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION AMERITECH SERVICE $175.64 $175.64 CEL SERVICE CENTER REPAIRS $270.71 REPAIRS $308.00 $578.71 CORKY'S CATERING, INC. COMM ASST DINNER $169.95 $169.95 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $24.69 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $16.77 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $154.84 $196.30 ROSCOR CORP. SERVICE PARTS $202.50 $202.50 SENNHEISER ELECTRONICS CORP. 6 BATTERIES $39.00 $39.00 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,362.10 GENERAL FUND $1,362.10 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE DEC LEGAL SERVICES $212.50 DEC LEGAL SERVICES $21.25 DEC LEGAL SERVICES $1,918.10 $2,236.35 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $107.02 MISC EXPENSES $17.75 $124.77* PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES $41.02 $41.02 VON BRIESEN AND PUREELL, S.C. DECEMBER LEGAL FEES $565.00 $565.40 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $16,434.91 GENERAL FUND $16,434.91 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION AMERITECH SERVICE $175.64 $175.64 CEL SERVICE CENTER REPAIRS $270.71 REPAIRS $308.00 $578.71 CORKY'S CATERING, INC. COMM ASST DINNER $169.95 $169.95 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $24.69 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $16.77 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $154.84 $196.30 ROSCOR CORP. SERVICE PARTS $202.50 $202.50 SENNHEISER ELECTRONICS CORP. 6 BATTERIES $39.00 $39.00 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,362.10 GENERAL FUND $1,362.10 VENDOR. FINANCE DEPARTMENT ALPHAGRAPHICS #335 COFFEE BREAK, INC. COMPUTERWORLD JAY'N BEE OFFICE SOLUTIONS,INC MIDLAND PAPER COMPANY PC MAGAZINE PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION DIVIDERS BUDGET COVERS BUDGET SUPPLIES. COFFEE SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION DATA PROD DRUM CARTRIDGE PAPER SUBSCRIPTION MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES l; ei �W INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $1,057.67 POSTAGE PHONE METER RENTAL $98.80 $240.75 $150.00 $1,306.47 $51.90 $51.90 $34.95 $34.95 343.66 $343.66 556.56 $566.56 $29.97 $29.97 $45.99 2 MEMORY CHIPS $1.30 $385.00 $22.73 CK SIGNER INK ROLLER $14.04 $117.50 $2.47 $85.53* PITNEY BOWES INC. POSTAGE PHONE METER RENTAL $240.75 $240.75 POSTMASTER VEHICLE STICKERS $6,006.91 DOG LICENSES $536.22 $6,543.13* SHESHUNOEF INFO. SERVICES INC. FINANCIAL REPORTS $237.95 $237.95 SUSIE SOFTWARE 2 MEMORY CHIPS $385.00 $385.00 NED V. ZIZZO, INC. CK SIGNER INK ROLLER $117.50 $117.50 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $9,944.37 GENERAL FUND $9,944.37 VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS SIGN -6-94 $68.34 SIGN -2-95 $60.30 $128.64 MIDLAND PAPER COMPANY PAPER $47.50 $47.50 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $99.04 $99.04 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $275.18 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $275.18 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BROOKFIELD CRAWFORD & COMPANY FORMULA AUTOMOTIVE, INC. FGRE DE BORN LIFE INSURANCE GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. R. E. HARRINGTON, INC. HMO ILLINOIS DOROTHY JOHNSON KNIGHT,HOPPE,FANNING&KNIGHTrLT LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C, WALTER SCHULTZ RANDALL WERDERITCH CINDY WESTER RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RISK MANAGEMENT FUND MED CLAIMS THRU 1/18 $36,8446 * MED CLAIMS THRU 1726 $50r335`7 $87,180.46* TIME & EXPENSE BILLING $455.10 $455.10 INSURANCE CLAIM $362.67 $362.67 FEB95 LIFE INSURANCE $2r409.03 $2,409.03 ANNUAL FEE $6,000.00 $6x000.00 FEB95 ADMIN FEES $4,554.11 FEB95 EXCESS LOSS PREM $14x571.85 CODE REVIEW FEES $5.30 $19,131.26 FEB95 HLTH INSURANCE $26 949.18 $161.86 $26,949.18 $161.86 INSURANCE CLAIM -1112 INSURANCE CLAIM $3r183.27 $3,183.27 #4514 BODY REPAIRS 583.81 $583.81 INSURANCE CLAIM 8608,69 $608.69 SVCS -0840000665768 $17.00 $17.00 INSURANCE CLAIM $36.87 $36.87 REIMBURSEMENT $8.88 $8.88 INSURANCE CLAIM -11%25/94 $69.99 $69.99 ***TOTAL** $147,158.07 $147,158.07 INSPECTION SERVICES BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC. PUBLICATION $52.00 $52.00 ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CODE ENFORCE 2 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS $75.00 $75.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES JO -LAN COMPANY XEROGRAPHIC BOND $107.35 $107.35 K & E TECHNOLOGY INC. REPAIR MR 101B COUNTER $70.00 $70.00 MIDLAND PAPER COMPANY PAPER $47.50 $47.50 NOVA CELLULAR SERVICE $14.36 SERVICE $12.93 SERVICE 12.93 119,43 $40.22 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $20.07 MISC EXPENSES $3.07 $42.57* PETTY CASH -- PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $31.49 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $63.98 $95.47* THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S 1 ELEVATOR REINSPECTION $29.00 $29.00 INSPECTION SERVICES ***TOTAL** $559.11 GENERAL FUND $559.11 POLICE DEPARTMENT ABM, INC. SUPPLIES $114.50 $119.50 AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $12.50 PARTS $8000 PARTS $147 04 $239.54 AMERITECH SERVICE $37 44 $37.44 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, IN LAW OFFICERS BULLETIN $14000 $140.00 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. DEC94 CAR WASHES $536-00 $536.00 BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS SYMPATHY-BOYD $50-00 $50.00 CARQUEST OF MT. PROSPECT PARTS $28.89 PARTS. $2889 $57.78 COMP USA COMPUTER SUPPLIES $43.58 $43.58 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION COMPUTER & SUPPLIES $45 3 00 COMPUTER & SUPPLIES $1,340 00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT" PROSPECT PAGE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31195 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT COMPUTER & SUPPLIES $276.00 COMPUTER & SUPPLIES $64,00 $2,133.40 COMPUSERVE, INC COMPUTER INFO SVCE $10,00 $10.00 WALTER W. CRIBBINS CO. MCGRUFF SUPPLIES $168.68 MCGRUFF SUPPLIES $369.81 $538.49 CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED ENVELOPES 136.20 ENVELOPES 1239,90 $376.10 DAILY HERALD CLASSIFIED AD $183.59 $183.59 DICTAPHONE CORPORATION SERVICE CALL $161.36 SERVICE CALL $133,50 $294,86 DOUGLAS TV 1 TOSHIBA VCR $228.00 $228.00 G.B. OFFICE SUPPLIES, INC, 1 HP -2 RECHARGE $59,00 RECHARGE $123.00 $182,00 GANG PREVENTION INC. GANG I.D. MANUAL $55.00 $55.00 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES 4 TIRES $216.72 WHEEL MICE $44.99 4 TIRES $216.72 $478.43 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT DRUG TEST KITS 139.87 1120,00 139.87 9120.00 GREATER COOK COUNTY CAPTAIN'S 1995 DUES {6ES 6 HANSEN ASSOCIATES A O IATES SVCE & CtOPI $139.7 SVCE & COPIES $71.15 SVCE & COPIES $247,73 SVCE & COPIES $292,55 $751.19 ILLINOIS ASSOC. OF TECHNICAL MEMBER DUES-DAHLBERG 30.00 $30.00 INT'L ASSN OF ARSON INVESTIGA MEMBER DUES-GIBSON 140,00 $40.00 INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF CHIEFS 76 TRAINING KEYS $380.00 $380.00 KALE UNIFORMS, INC. CREDIT $227.10- 2 POLICE SAFETY VESTS $43,62 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $164.00 $19.48 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. PARES 55.84 981-33 PARTS PARTS $31.20 PARTS $47.06 PARTS $14.70 PARTS $46,5.6 $276.69 LITTLE AMERICA DEC94 PRISONER FOOD $156.95 $156.95 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1%31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC OFFICE SUPPLIES $17.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES $16.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES $141.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES $150.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $150.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $150.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $6.35 $39.58 $.41 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 4EFICE FUMINATORSIES 475.00$475.00 $ $4343.30 MIDLAND PAPER COMPANY PAPER a $$40 MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST PARTS 40.00 ■/0�■!00 MUNICIPAL ELECTRONICS INC.87 .DAR --IT 733. $733.87 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP D EY/KOLANOWSKI--NEG.WRKPLC 1198-00 $198.00 NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS FEB95 MEMBER ASSESSMENT $29,063.10 $29,063.10 NOVA CELLULAR SERVICE $440.90 $ .90 RAY O'HERRON COir INC. SUPPLIES $36* $36,78 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $124.17 MISC EXPENSES $111.96 MISC EXPENSES $ 18,66 MISC EXPENSES 5.65 $5.54 MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $33.62 * $250.00 ERIC E. PIES RADIO REPAIRS 250.00 $371.00 $ PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL DEC94 STRAYS $' $371.00 QUICK PRINT PLUSr INC. JUVENILE CASE REPORTS 82.65 CONT/SUPPLEMENT CONT SUPPLEMENT REPORTS $ 150.30 PRIV PROP ACCIDENT REPORTS $85.50 $31$.45 RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP. FILM & PROCESSING $5.84 FILM & PROCESSING $21.32 FILM & PROCESSING $1.60 FILM & PROCESSING $13.60 FILM & PROCESSING $17.08 FILM & PROCESSING $206.90 $266.34 REND INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION RADIO BATTERIES $927.00 $927.00 SAVE -A -PET DEC94 STRAYS $175.00 $175,00 SCHMERLER FORD INC. DEC94 CAR RENTAL $100.00 $100.00 VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT THE SIGN PALACE SPEED -E -ARROW PRESS SUBURBAN TRIM & GLASS CO. THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE TRW CREDIT DATA DIVISION UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY WHOLESALE TO THE INSTALLER WOLF CAMERA, INC. POLICE DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL P-10 REPAIRS $170.00 $19,94 P-19 COMPLETE LETTERED $350,00 $520.00 COURT JACKETS $1,063.26 $1,063-26 P-7 REPAIRS $250-00 $250-00 MANAGING POL.TRNG-CONDOM $500-00 $32-58 LIES IN DISGUISE-KOLANOWSKI $275.00 $775.00 DEC BKGRD CK INFO SVCE $25.00 $25-00 PARTS $741.00 $741-00 PARTS $68.82 PARTS $60.65 PARTS $62.88 $192-35 FILM 285-80 FILM 1239-80 CREDIT $48,00- $ 477.60 GENERAL FUND $46r032.49 ***TOTAL** $46r032.49 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC. BENCH VISE ASSEMBLY $750.00 $750,00 AMERITECH SERVICE $130.53 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES, INC. ARTISTIC BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE LINEN SERVICE LINEN SERVICE LINEN SERVICE 20 SHIRTS 5 T-SHIRTS DEC94 CAR WASHES $39.1? $19,94 $18.60 $208.24 $112.15 $68.80 $38.21 $218.36 $98.34 $32-58 $130.92 $12.00 $12.00 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. EDWARD CAVELLO CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC. GREAT LAKES DIVISION IAFC GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE J AND N ENTERPRISES, INC. G. E. KERR LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC MAC'S FIRE AND SAFETY, INC. MACACADEMY MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS INC. NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC NATIONAL SOCIETY OF EXECUTIVE NORMED NORTHEAST PUBLISHING GROUP NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL PETTY CASE - FIRE DEPT. PROFESSIONAL HYDRO TESTERS,INC VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION ORG MEMBERSHIP -1ST QTR DUES INTL ASSC FIRE CHIEF EXP SERVICE CREDIT PARTNERS IN LRNG-CAVELLO SUPPLIES 6 MEMBERSHIPS BKGRD&PRINTS/FREEMAN/STEWART SUPPLIES 4 CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTORS OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES NAME PATCH COMPUTER SUPPLIES DISASTER SEMINAR -TRILL DISASTER CONF-THILL MEMBERSHIP-CAVELLO CAVELLO ULREICH MEMBERS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION-CAVELLO FEB95 MEMBER ASSESSMENT RELEASE FORMS MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES MEETINGS TRAINING SUPPLIES HYDROTEST BTLS INVOICE AMOUNT $50.00 $252.00 $70.00 $55,54- $99.00 $816.33 $90.00 $72.00 $258.82 $159.80 $111.12 129.00 144.00 $15.50 $166.80 $224.00 $191.00 8 95.00 50.00 $48.96 $717.24 $119.00 $3,963.15 $60.00 $4.00 $7.98 $12.24 $3.88 $31.40 $7.40 $15.92 $20.93 $15.00 $9.35 $2.91 $180.00 PAGE 11 TOTAL $312.00 $14.46 $99.00 $816.33 $90.00 $72.00* $258.82 $159.80 $384.12 $15.50 $166.80 $415.00 95.00 50.00 $766.20 $119.00 $3,963.15 $60.00 $131.01 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC, ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES LEONARD W. BAZAN COMMUNITY CAB CO. CONVEY SAFETY PRODUCTS DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C JUDY FELL MARGARET FLOREY JOHN AND MARGE GLEN DON GRAD CAROLYN HENDERSON DONALD HOEG KEEPER'S PHARMACY RAY LUNDIN MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORPORATION MIDLAND PAPER COMPANY NANCY MORGAN NCOA NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $1,020.25 PAGE 12 $108.00 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT COFFEE SUPPLIES $78.00 $186.00 PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 $9.00 $9.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. $43.18 UNIVERSAL CASSETTE $90.00 HYDROTEST BTLS $135.00 $315.00 SOCIETY OF FIRE PROTECTION MEMBERSHIP-ESCONDO $150.00 $150.00 SPECIALIZED RESCUE SYSTEMS, IN EQUIPMENT $673.00 $673.00 WAL-MART STORES, INC. 6 WATER COOLERS $59.46 $59.46 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. $9.00 ***TOTAL** $10,505.17 GENERAL FUND $10,505.17 MEDICAL SUPPLIES $6.95 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC, ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES LEONARD W. BAZAN COMMUNITY CAB CO. CONVEY SAFETY PRODUCTS DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C JUDY FELL MARGARET FLOREY JOHN AND MARGE GLEN DON GRAD CAROLYN HENDERSON DONALD HOEG KEEPER'S PHARMACY RAY LUNDIN MICROFLEX MEDICAL CORPORATION MIDLAND PAPER COMPANY NANCY MORGAN NCOA NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES $1r020,25 $1,020.25 COFFEE SUPPLIES $108.00 COFFEE SUPPLIES $78.00 $186.00 DEC DRIVERS REIMS $9.00 $9.00 SENIOR TAXI RIDES $627.50 $627.50 MEDICAL SUPPLIES $43.18 $43.18 UNIVERSAL CASSETTE $90.00 MICE EQUIPMENT $ 52.00 $342.00 REIMB SUPPLIES 70.14 $70.14 REIMB SEMINAR REGISTRATION 25.00 $25.00 DEC DRIVERS REIMB $9.00 $9.00 DEC DRIVERS REIMB $5.00 $6.00 DEC DRIVERS REIMB $9.00 $9.00 DEC DRIVERS REIMB $18.00 $18.00 MEDICAL SUPPLIES $6.95 $6.95 DEC DRIVERS REIMB $15.00 $15.00 MEDICAL SUPPLIES $64.50 $64.50 PAPER $23.75 $23.75 REIMB HUMIDIFIER $119.95 $119.95 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL $120.00 $120.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $89.76 VENDOR HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT NOVA CELLULAR NOVA CELLULAR OAKTON PAVILLION HEALTHCARE NINA PERSINO PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OFFICE SUPPLIES SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE HOME DELIVERED MEALS REIMB EXPENSES & FEES MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES PAGE 13 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $14,58 $104.34 $27.22 $27,22 $29,95 $29-95 $2t287.50 $2,187.50 $45.00 $45.00 34.69 $ 3.53 $15.00 $16.44 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL $40.20 S94.86* RAVENSWOOD COMM. MENTAL HEALTH VIOLENCE SEMINAR-FOLEY $25.00 $25.00 SCIENTIFIC SUPPLY CO. MEDICAL SUPPLIES $40.15 $40.15 BERTHA STEIL DEC DRIVERS REIMB 15.00 $15.00 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 124.00 $24.00 CLEM WASICK DEC DRIVERS REIMB $6.00 $6.00 KATHI WESLEY DEC DRIVERS REIMB $12.00 $12.00 ESTHER WITTE DEC DRIVERS REIMB $6.00 $6.00 RUTH WITTENBURG DEC DRIVERS REIMB $9.00 $9.00 LEE AND DICK YOUNG DEC DRIVERS REIMB $6.00 $6.00 303 CAB ASSOCIATION, INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES $13-00 $13.00 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $5,360.24 GENERAL FUND $5,360.24 i JF"Z_lj4zlemJ) A-21 Z4V �l y � AMERICAN SPEEDY PRINTING CENT. FOLDING 1200 ENVELOPES $15.75 $15-75 B & H INDUSTRIES XEROX BOND COPY PAPER $75.00 $75.00 CORPORATION FOR ENTERPRISE DEV PUBLICATION $23.90 $23.90 GIRL SCOUTS - ILLINOIS CROSS- DEC94 BOXWOOD ADVOCACY $2,300.00 $2r300.00 GOVERNOR'S OFFICE PLNG & BUDGT PUBLICATION $10.00 $10.00 ILLINOIS DRIVEWAYS SCBG-103 S. HATLEN $4r910-00 $4,910.00 VENDOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION PAGE 14 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS KAM CONSTRUCTION AND C.D.B.G. NOTICE CDBG-515 N. WILLS $60.30 $767.50 $60.30 $767.50 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $49.99 $4.28 $49.99 $4.28* PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT, PRI CONTRACTORS MISC EXPENSES CDBG-7 WESTGATE $4,215.00 $4x215.00 SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C ACCESS TO CARE $1,333.33 $1,333.33 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $13,765.05 GENERAL FUND $168.92 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $13,586.13 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $10.00 STREET DIVISION ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $10.71 SUPPLIES $1$.85 SUPPLIES $10.71 SUPPLIES $11.92 SUPPLIES $12.10 SUPPLIES 64.79 s SUPPLIES 50.26 $179.34 AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $67.73 $30.00 $97.73 AEENA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $164.87 $136.67 PARTS PARTS PARTS $75.60 25.76 $603.90 ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY MATERIALS $181.20 $380-66 MATERIALS MATERIALS $321.30 $883.16 AM -LIN PRODUCES, INC. MICE SUPPLIES MTCE SUPPLIES $150.48 $245.62 $396.10 VENDOR STREET DIVISION AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN ANTIOCH TIRE, INC. GEORGE BARTNICKI BERTHOLD NURSERY BILL'S LAWN & POWER BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER BRUDNO ART SUPPLY CO., INC, BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO, BUILDERS SQUARE, IHC. BUSSE CAR WASH INC, CADE INDUSTRIE6 CARPET LAYING SERVICE INC. CENTURY LABS/PRO CLEAN, INC. CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CHICAGO TURF & IRRIGATION CINTAS CORP ARTHUR CLESERF INC, COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMMONWEALTH EDISON COOK COUNTY TREASURER VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SUPPLIES $204.74 SUPPLIES $134.58 $339-32 TIRE REPAIR $12,50 2 TIRE REPAIRS $103.50 $116.00 CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL $101.50 $101.50 TREES $1,164.00 $1r164.00 NTCE SUPPLIES $10.10 $10.10 CREDIT $9.70 - PARTS $529.37 PARTS $251-62 PARTS -$95.00 PARTS $54,29 $920,58 SUPPLIES $128.33 SUPPLIES $86.02 $214.35 DOOR REPAIRS $341.70 $341.70 HUMIDIFIER SUPPLIES $112.00 ES SUPPLICAR $28.86 $140.86 DEC94, WASHES $4.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES $881.$4.7050 CLEANING SUPPLIES $881.75 CLEANING SUPPLIES $590.45 CLEANING SUPPLIES $87,50 $2,441.45 CARPET $842.74 CARPET $226,24 $1,068,98 SUPPLIES $52.36 SUPPLIES $48.18 $100.54 CLEANING SUPPLIES $316,36 $316-36 NTCE SUPPLIES $245.79 $245.79 UNIFORM SERVICE $128,69 UNIFORM SERVICE 131-64 UNIFORM SERVICE 8131,64 $391.97 GRASS SEED $1r485.00 $1t485.00 SVCS RENDERED $6,072.00 $6f072.00 BJ80-JT-23212 $227-38 $227.38 LIGHTPOLE-COTTONWOOD $1r675.01 $1,675.01* TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE $1,050.00 $1,050-00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31�95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION STREET DIVISION CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC. RAY ENDRE EPE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FLINK COMPANY W. W. GRAINGER INC. Be HANEY AND SONS, INC, HANSEN'S LANDSCAPING SERV.INC. HUGO'S EQUIPMENT REPAIR, INC. HYDRONICS PIPING ILCA INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON KIEFT BROTHERS INC. KNAPP SHOES INC. JANE LAMBESIS LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. J.C. LICHT COMPANY MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE NEST NATURAL PATH FORESTRY CONSULT, NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. MTCE SUPPLIES MTCE SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL BATTERY MTCE CONTRACT MTCE SUPPLIES MTCE SUPPLIES MTCE SUPPLIES DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS REMOVE & REINSTALL PAVERS 1 DYNA GENERATOR REPLACE HUMIDIFIER ILCA FOREMAN TRNG-GATTAS ILCA FOREMAN TRNG-GATTAS MTCE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SAFETY SHOES-CASTELLANOS REIMB 4 S/C S/W SQUARES PARTS -TS PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS REPL RAM FOR PRESS PARTS TREE RISK ASSESSMENT ROAD SALT ROAD SALT ROAD SALT ROAD SALT ROAD SALT ROAD SALT ROAD SALT ROAD SALT 1618 1/2 BONITA DRIVE INVOICE AMOUNT 17.29 22.97 $98-00 $1,440.00 $526,00 $262.60 $22.64 $112.50 $615.00 $669.00 $547.16 $140.00 $10.00 $117.53 42.55 $50.00 $96,00 14.20 41.00 28.40 18.40 $46.10 $180.90 1176.95 411.50 $110.00 $2,635.00 $1,736.08 $3,516.02 8,740.78 1,760.85 $2,912.05 $4,591,63 $4,655.61 $3,525.31 $244.41 PAGE 16 $40.26 $98.00 $1,440.00 $790,60 $22.64 $112.50 $615.00 $669.00 $547.16 $150.00* $17.53 $342-55 $50i00 $96.00 $769.35 $110.00 $2,635.00 $31,438.33 $244.41 VENDOR STREET DIVISION NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC* PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS PINNER ELECTRIC POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY SAUBER MPG, CO, SECRETARY OF STATE SHEPP PEST CONTROL SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC, STATE TREASURER VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES' SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNAL MICE PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES 304 & 306 TITLE & REG PEST CONTROL SERVICES PEST CONTROL SERVICES PEST CONTROL SERVICES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES THERMOSTAT PLUMBING SUPPLIES PLUMBING SUPPLIES MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS PAGE 17 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $9,80 $36-63 $294.72 $226-83 $123.27 51-15 10,14 $105-26 $1,435.07 $1,37 $197.05 $289.41 8-50 $1y198,24 $3r907,44 $51.26 $51.26 $102-52 $86.70 $86,70 6*97 9 4,32 $72.79 $17*27 $19,26 $120,61* $2,394,95 $2094.95 W1*80 $240.14 398*34 $328,00 $328.00 $42*00 $42.00* $88.34 $88-33 $88.33 $265,00 $12.98 $12-98 $30.28 $56.24 $78.29 $493,33 $571-62 $141.24 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1%31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $249,01 MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $324.31 MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $51$.69 MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $253.97 MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $469.04 MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $384.26 MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $291.88 $2,632.40 STEINER ELECTRIC COMPANY SUPPLIES $65.25 SUPPLIES $162.09 1 CONTACTOR $385.88 $613.22 TRI -ANGLE FABRICATORS & BODY C 6 PLOW BLADES $561.00 $561.00 TRICOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MONITOR $240.00 $240.00 UC REGENTS PUBLICATION $32.00 $32.00 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES $28.69 $28.69 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 101 S. MAPLE STREET $11.92 $11.92 VULCAN SIGN GREEN POST $2,985.00 $2,985.00 WARNING LIEES OF ILLINOIS 2 SIGNS $77.54 $77.54 DAWN WUCKI REIMB DAMAGED CLOTHING $30.18 $30.18 1ST AYD CORPORATION SUPPLIES $106.11 $106.11 STREET DIVISION ***TOTAL** $76,356.83 GENERAL FUND $36,206.15 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $37,515.68 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $2,635.00 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ABM, INC. MTCE PROGRAM $27$.00 $278.00 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $61.41 SUPPLIES $52.65 SUPPLIES $83.48 $198.04 AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $164.88 VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION AMERITECH AT&T BADGER METER INC SANK OF AMERICA BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER BUSSE CAR WASH, INC, CADE INDUSTRIES CAS BOOKS CELLULAR ONE FIELD SERVICES VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARTS $34.10 PARTS $225,76 PARTS $43.60 $468.34 SERVICE $31.21 SERVICE $247.71 SERVICE $543.27 SERVICE $37.04 SERVICE $31,21 SERVICE $31.21 SERVICE $62.42 SERVICE $31.21 SERVICE 97.32 SERVICE 118,20 SERVICE $17.55 SERVICE $23.44 SERVICE $19.01 SERVICE $17.82 SERVICE $277.41 SERVICE $20.40 $1x466.43 016 262 4197 001 $7.08 $7.48 ACCESS PLUS SVCE AGREEMENT $429.00 WATER METERS $970.20 EATER METERS $3,048,00 COMPOUND WATER METER $1,142.88 $5,590.08 OPER I . COSTS-JAWA $10,817.00 VLG RE FIXED COSTS-JAWA $99r564.00 LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA $55r645.00 POWER COSTS -JAWA $11x325,00 $177x351,00* PARES $529.36 PARTS $251.62 PARTS' $94,99 PARTS $88.90 $964.87 DEC94 CAR WASHES $29.25 $29.25 CLEANING SUPPLIES $590.45 $590.45 PUBLICATION $56.00 $66.00 DEC94 CELLULAR SERVICE $122.33 $122.33 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION CENTURY LABS/PRO CLEAN, INC, SUPPLIES $233,52 $233.52 CHICAGO COMM. SERVICEr INC. 2 PHONE ANTENNAS $68.00 $68.00 CINTAS CORP UNIFORM SERVICE $128.69 UNIFORM SERVICE $131,64 UNIFORM SERVICE $131-64 $391,97 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMP USA BJ80-JT-23598 HARD DRIVE REPLACEMENT $4 522*53 1259,99 $4 522-53 $259.99 CONSERV FS 4Y SUPPLIES $169.00 $169.00 R. L. COR& COMPANY SUPPLIES $372,50 $372,50 CURTIS INDUSTRIES INC* MTCE SUPPLIES $17-30 MTCE SUPPLIES $22,96 $40.26 DAILY HERALD CLASSIFIED AD AD17.28 177,32 $CLASSIFIED $294-60 FINISHMASTERf INC. AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES $26.46 $26-46 W, W, GRAINGER INC, MTCE SUPPLIES $264.80 $264.80 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO, SUPPLIES $155.71 $155.71 H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE WATER METER SVCE $95,16 WATER METER SVCE 107-06 WATER METER SVCE 1309.27 METER TESTING $162,05 WATER METER SVCE $166.53 METER TESTING $522,64 METER TESTING $142.74 WATER METER SVCE 687-94 METER TESTING 1190.32 WATER METER SVCE $1,131,88 WATER METER SVCE $151,72 METER EXCHANGES $763.77 $4f431.08 INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON MTCE SUPPLIES $27,12 MTCE SUPPLIES 17.54 $44*66 INMAC SUPPLIES $1 27.99 $ 27.99 JKL CONSULT. CIVIL ENGRS, LTD, ENGINEERING SERVICES $3r458,75 ENGINEERING SERVICES $346.00 $3,804,75 JOSEPH ELECTRONICS REPL HEADSET -TRANSCRIBER $27,35 $27.35 JULIE, INC. SVCE CHARGES $70.40 $70.40 KELBURN ENGINEERING CO. MTCE SUPPLIES $225.40 $225.40 VENDOR NATER AND SEWER DIVISION LAN MAGAZINE LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. J.C. LICHT COMPANY LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC MATCO TOOLS MID --WEST METER COMPANY, INC. MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST JOHN MURPHY NET MIDWEST, INC. NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORDS POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY POSTMASTER RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP. REGION 5 SALES & SERVICE, INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT SUBSCRIPTION PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES REPL RAM FOR PRESS MTCE SUPPLIES PARTS CREDIT REIMB CDL RENEWAL COLIFORM ANALYSIS 12 / 9 4 WATER SAMPLES 112 E HIGHLAND AVE PARTS OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES LEGAL PAGE LEGAL PAGE TRAVEL SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL &..SUPPLIES TRAVEL `SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES PARTS POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS FILM PROCESSING PARTS $22.97 $40.54 $62.25 $41.60/y $9.78 41.80 14.20 $13.40 $60.65 $55.50 $39.00 $102.92 $411.50 $60.02 $65.00 $65.00- $3000 $203.00 $77.00 $160.77 $721.45 $100.79 $51.92 22.80 45.60 $23.71 $51.96 $8.14 $1132 843.29 32.73 $133.20 $550.52 $553.73 � 112� $266,40 PAGE 21 TOTAL $22.97 $223.57 $155.15 102.92 411.50 $50.02 $.00 $_/+�{0.00 $280.00 $160.77 $721.45 $100.79 $51.92 $68.40 $171.154 $133.20 $1,104.250 $11.24 $266.40 VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION RTP - SUBURBAN SAUBER MFG. CO, SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI WAL-MART INC. WHOLESALE TO THE INSTALLER WINFIELD ENGINEERS, INC, WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WATER & SEWER FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL EXCHANGE OF PLANT MATERIAL $219.18 REPL PLANT MATERIAL $516.00 $735-18 SUPPLIES $102.00 $102.00 MICE SUPPLIES $27-35 $27.35 TOOLS $177.16 $177.16 SUPPLIES $30-17 30-17 FILM & CAMERA SUPPLIES $17.84 t17.84 PARTS $22-94 $22.94 SERVICES RENDERED $6,800.75 $6,800-75 ***TOTAL** $214j851-93 $214,851,93 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION MIDWEST PENCE CORP, MTCE SUPPLIES $42.00 $42.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 19 E NORTHWEST HWY $14-90 $14.90 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $56.90 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $56-90 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY DECEMBER COLLECTIONS $39,400-96 DECEMBER COLLECTIONS $14r393-33 DECEMBER COLLECTIONS $26t692-38 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION DECEMBER COLLECTIONS $2x441.03 DECEMBER COLLECTIONS $7x473.87 DECEMBER COLLECTIONS $997.$2 $91,399.39* GROOS RECYCLING AND WASTE SERV DISPOSAL OF WHITE GOODS $30.00 $30.00 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $91x429.39 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $91x429.39 ******************************************************************************************************** 1-0 ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY KEYS $30-00 NEW LOCKS & KEYS $704,44 $734.44 CE DESIGN LTD. ENGINEERING SVCS RENDERED $2,543,71 $2x543.71 CENTURY TLE SUPPLY COMPANY FLOOR TILE $27,27 $27,27 ELITE COMPUTER SUPPORT, INC. COMPUTER SUPPLIES $2x925.00 $2x925.00 THE FILE MART FILE POCKET FOLDERS $125.00 $125.00 FIRE CONTROL, INC. SVCE CALL -SPRINKLER- $201.00 $201.00 GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SER 2 TIRES $671,15 $671.15 HENRICKSEN ENGINEERING FURNITURE $4 92$.4 7 $4,928,47 MATERIAL SYSTEMS, INC. ZINC POST 190.19 $190.19 NORTHWEST FIRE EXTINGUISHER & 8 PORTABLE FIRE EXT. $331.92 $331.92 RUST ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTR. SVCS RENDERED $6,$25.82 SVCS RENDERED $9,111.04 $15,935,$6 SAUBER MFG, CO. SUPPLIES $125.00 SUPPLIES $125.00 $250.00 TRICOM COMMUHICATIONSx INC. JAIL CELL DOOR INTERLOCK $1x045.00 $1,045.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $29,910.01 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $12,007.00 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND $1,045.00 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND $15,936.86 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $921.15 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES COMMONWEALTH EDISON BG21--JT-1838-A $42.63 $42.63 MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOLI BUDGET ALLOCATION $2,916.67 $2,915.67 RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER RENT - JANUARY $2,000.00 RENT -FEBRUARY $2,000.00 $4,000.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $6,959.30 GENERAL FUND $6,959.30 DEBT SERVICE AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK SERIES 87 B BOND FEES $250.00 i i ! i DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 19870 $500.00 $250.00 $500.00 ***TOTAL** $500.00 PENSIONS HELEN L. FALK PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 25 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/31/95 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PENSIONS ***TOTAL** $100.00 GENERAL FUND $100.00 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $lr428r476.97 DATE RUN 1%31/95 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 26 TIME RUN 13.05.54 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID-APPBAR SUMMARY BY FUND 1/31/95 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $637,928.26 11 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 94,043.72 12 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 37,515.68 13 COMMUNITY DERLPMR BLOCK GRANT $15,715.27 30 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 19870 $500.00 51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $19,868.92 52 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND $1,045.00 59 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND $15,936.86 61 RATER & SEWER FUND $2264,623.09 63 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $806.04 67 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $92 1 15 69 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $151,164.17 71 POLICE PENSION FUND $57,350*50 72 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 68,132.90 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 862,925*41 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,428,476.97 illage of Mount P-r0spect Mount Prospect, Illinois 00hiad A*01,0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO* MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 16, 1995 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLASS S LIQUOR LICENSE MARLONSII 2664 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (COLONY SHOPPING CENTER,) On Thursday, January 5, 1995, the Village Manager met with Mr. Jose Alvarez and Maria Alvarez regarding their request for the creation of a Class S Liquor License. The License will be used in conjunction with the operation of Marlons 11 Restaurant. The Class S Liquor designation provides for the consumption of alcoholic beverages on site in conjunction with a lounge. The location of the restaurant is the last tenant space on the southwest comer of the Colony Shopping Center located at South Elmhurst Road and Oakton Street. The most recent operation at this site was Al's Diner, a restaurant without a Liquor License. Prior to that, it was once the site of a Swensen's Ice Cream facility. Mr. Alvarez indicated that the restaurant would be operated without major redecorating or renovation. The restaurant's theme and menu will be California -style Tex-Mex The former customer counter will be converted into the bar area. Mr. Alvarez stated that his family currently operates a similar restaurant named Marlons in the area of Grand and Austin in Chicalgo. This restaurant has been *in operation for over 15 years. The Chicago location has had a Liquor Licensesince lits,opening. The L,iquor License Will be held by Saboricito, Inc. Mrl. Alvarez has a lease forthe space, which runs through October 1997. As of this time, Mr. Alvarez,has taken possession of the tenant space and will operate the restaurant without service of alcohol. The Village Manager discussed with Jose Alvarez and Maria Alvarez some of the particulars of the Village's Liquor Ordinance and the general philosophy of the Village regarding the sale and consumption of alcohol. Jose and Maria Alvarez indicated that they understand the requirements of the Mount Prospect Liquor Code and are very familiar with the operation of a restaurant that serves alcohol. The required Liquor License application, supporting documents and fees have been submitted to the Village and are in order. Appropriate background checks are currently being conducted. A representative from Marions 11 will be present to answer any questions that you may have. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: That Subsection A of Secfion 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same I is 'hereby further amended by S increasing the numberof Clas "S"I liquor licenses by one ('I) (Saboricitio, Inc., a MartoWs Il, Colony Square Shopping Center, 2664, South Elmhurst Road), so 'that heireafter said Subsection A of Section 13,107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows: �L)ection 12.107. Number of Lice, so, W~ I Else One (1) Class A License Two (2) Class B Licenses Nine (9) Class C Licenses One (1) Class D License Two (2) Class E Licenses One (1) Class G License One (1) Class H License One (1) Class M License One (1) Class P License Twenty-one (21) Class R Licenses Thirteen (13) Class S Licenses One (1) Class T License Seven (7) Class W Licenses a, 4, .E..CTl1Qb! MO.., That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1995. Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk Class, Estatfishment Nurpber A Mrs. P & Me 1 B Dumas Walter's; Ye Olde Town Inn 2 C Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano Liquors; Dominick's (83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors; Jay Liquors; Mt. Prospect Liquors; Osco Drugs; Walgreens (83 and Goff); Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza) 9 D Prospect Moose Lodge 1 E Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's Banquet Hall 2 G Mount Prospect Park District -Golf Course 1 H Zanie's 1 M Holiday Inn 1 P Shimada Shoten 1 R Artemis; DJB Brunetti; Chungkiwa Restaurant; Crabster Bay Fresh Seafood Restaurant; Edwardo's; Fellini; Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); House of Szechwan; lzakaya Sankyu; LaTejanita; Little America; Magic Dragon; Nina Restaurant; Pepe's; Pusan; Sakura; New Shin Jung; Sunrise; Tedino's; Torishin, Yasuke 21 S Applebee's; East Side Mado's; El Sombrero; Emerson Street Caberat and Grill; Jake's Pizza; Jameson's Charhouse; Kampai; Marlon's, 11 ' ; Martinelli; Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant; Retro Bistro; Sam's Place; Wild Stallions Cafe 13 T Thunderbird Lanes 1 W Los Arcos Restaurant; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace; Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut; Rosati's Pizza; Taqueria Fiesta 7 61 VillaQoe of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. BARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 16,1995 SUBJECT.- REQUEST FOR CLASS S LIQUOR LICENSE POP'S GRILL AND BAR 1904 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (FORMERLY EDWARDO'S PIZZA) On Thursday, January 5, 1995, the Village Manager met withp_p asl'of Pap's Cafe, Ltd., regarding a request by that corporation for the creation of a Class S Liquor License. The License will be used in conjunction with the operation of Pop's Grill and I Bar. The Class S Liquor designation provides for the consumption of alcoholic beverages on site in conjunction with a lounge. Mr. Pappas, a resident of Mount Prospect, stated that his corporation had a contract pending for the purchase of the Edwardo's Pizza site at the above -referenced location. Mr. Pappas said that he planned to change the theme of the facility from a pizzeria to a restaurant with a lounge that had a sports theme.. Mr. Pappas estimated approximately $200,000 in redecorating and renovation expenses as part of the make -over of the location. Mr. Pappas indicated that the sports theme would include such games as darts, fooze ball and small arcade games. There would be no pool tables located in the establishment. Mr. Pappas also indicated that a full menu would be offered with food service available at all times during operation. Mr. Pappas related that his prior experience In the restaurant business dealt mainly with fast food operations. His family currently owned such an establishment in the Village of Lombard and they were looking to expand into a sit-down facility with waitresses and table service. Mr. Pappas indicated his father had extensive experience in the liquor business through ownership of a liquor store and various bars in the City of Chicago. The Village Manager discussed with Mr. Pappas some of the particulars of the Village's Liquor Ordinance and the general philosophy of the Village regarding the sale and consumption of alcohol --especially by underaged persons. Mr. Pappas indicated that he understood fully the requirements of the Ordinance and would take all precautions necessary to avoid any problems. The required Liquor License application, supporting documents and fees have been submitted to the Village and are in order. Appropriate background checks are currently being conducted. Mr. Pappas will be present to answer any questions that you may have. Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois t1doo "g 4~1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 16, 1995 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLASS S LIQUOR LICENSE POP'S GRILL AND BAR 1904 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (FORMERLY EDWARDO'S PIZZA) On Thursday, January 5, 1995, the Village Manager met with Mr. Jim Pappas of Pap's J Cafe, Ltd., regarding a request by that corpo, tionfor the creation of a Class S Liquof: ,ra License. The License will be used in conjunctio'n,wifth the operation of Pop's Grill and Bar. The Class S 1-11quor designation provides for the consumption of alcoholic beverages on site in conjunction with a lounge. Mr. Pappas, a resident of Mount Prospect, stated that his corporation had a contract pending for the purchase of the Edwardo's Pizza site at the above -referenced location. Mr. Pappas said that he planned to change the theme of the facility from a pizzeria to a restaurant with a lounge that had a sports theme, Mr. Pappas estimated approximately $200,000 in redecorating and renovation expenses as part of the make -over of the location. Mr. Pappas indicated that the sports theme would include such games as darts, fooze ball and small arcade games. There would be no pool tables located in the establishment. Mr. Pappas also indicated that a full menu would be offered with food service available at all times during operation. Mr. Pappas related that his prior experience in the restaurant business dealt mainly with fast food operations. His family currently owned such an establishment in the Village of Lombard and they were looking to expand into a sit-down facility With waitresses and table service. 'Mr. Pappas indicated his father had extensive experience in the liquor business through ownership of a liquor store and various bars in the City of Chicago. The Village Manager discussed with Mr. Pappas some of the particulars of the Village's Liquor Ordinance and the general philosophy of the Village regarding the sale and consumption of alcohol --especially by underaged persons. Mr. Pappas indicated that he understood fully the requirements of the Ordinance and would take all precautions necessary to avoid any problems. The required Liquor License application, supporting documents and fees have been submitted to the Village and are in order. Appropriate background checks are currently being conducted. Mr. Pappas will be present to answer any questions that you may have. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: 5ECI QN IES That Subsection A of Section 13,107 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by decreasing the number of Class "R11 liquor licenses by one (1) (Edwardo's Restaurant, 1904 South Elmhurst Road and increasing the number of Class "S" liquor licenses by one (1) (Pap's Cafe, Ltd., d/b/a Pop's Grill & Bar, 1904 South Elmhurst Road) so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows: one (1) Class A License Two (2) Class B Licenses Nine (9) Class C Licenses One (1) Class D License Two (2) Class E Licenses One (1) Class G License One (1) Class H License One (1) Class M License One (1) Class P License Twenty (20) Class R Licenses Fourteen (14) Class S, Licenses One (1) Class T License Seven (7) Class W Licenses JON 'DLO. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1995. ATTEST: - ------------- Village Clerk Village President Class Establishment Number A Mrs. P & Me 1 B Dumas Walter's; Ye Olde Town Inn 2 C Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano Liquors; Dominick's (83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors; Jay Liquors; Mt. Prospect Liquors; Osco, Drugs; Walgreens (83 and Golf); Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza) 9 D Prospect Moose Lodge I E Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's Banquet Hall 2 G Mount Prospect Park District -Golf Course 1 H Zanie's I M Holiday Inn 1 P Shimada Shoten I R Artemis; DJB Brunetti; Chungkiwa Restaurant; Crabster Bay Fresh Seafood Restaurant; Fellini; Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); House of Szechwan; Izakaya Sankyu; Jang Soo; LaTejanita; Little America; Magic Dragon; Nina Restaurant; Pepe's; Sakura; New Shin Jung; Sunrise; Tedino's; Torishin; Yasuke 20 S Applebee's; East Side Mario's; El Sombrero; Emerson Street Cabaret and Grill; Jake's Pizza; Jameson's Charhouse; Kampai; Marlon's 11; Martinelli Restaurant; Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant; Pop's Grill & Bar; Retro Bistro; Sam's Place; Wild Stallions Cafe 14 T Thunderbird Lanes 1 W Los Arcos; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace; Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut; Rosati's Pizza; Taqueria Fiesta 7_ 61 Village of Mount Pros, ect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. BARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES "0 All FROK VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 27, 1995 JI) SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE - MT. PROSPECT LIQUORS 16 NORTH MAIN STREET 111l' lk 10114 loop", On Thursday, January 26, 1995, the Village Manager met with Mr. Chau Huynh and his wife, Lan Lam, regarding their request for the creation of a Class C Liquor License. The creation of a Class C License would be in conjunction with their purchase of Mt. Prospect Liquors. Mt. Prospect Liquors has operated continuously over 20 years as a package goods store. The Class C Liquor designation provides for the sale of alcoholic beverages in their original container. No consumption on the premises is allowed. Mr. Huynh will operate the business as a corporation. The corporation is newly formed for the purpose of operating the package goods business. In the past, Mt. Prospect Liquors has maintained a small video rental component of the business. That video rental component will remain as part of the change in ownership. Mr. Huynh and his wife have a lease for the tenant space which runs through January 31, 1998. Mr. Huynh and his wife indicated they have no prior experience in operating a package goods store. They also have no prior experience in operating a retail establishment. The Village generally looks for some prior experience in owning, operating or working in a retail environment as well as some prior experience in the sale of alcoholic beverages. In the past, experience in one or the other has been viewed as sufficient to warrant issuance of the License. There is some concern that without some experience in either field, a new License holder would be trying to "learn the ropes" of both sides of the business at the same time. In reviewing this application with Mayor Farley, the Liquor Commissioner, he has placed two conditions on the issuance of said License. The first condition is that a manager experienced in the retail' sale of alcoholic beverages be retained by the License holder for at least the StI6 the new business operation to provide for a smooth transition. owners enroll and successfully complete a course in appropriate techniques to prevent the sale of alcohol to underaged persons or those obviously in an intoxicated condition. The applicants have agreed to meet these two conditions. The License application file contains a signed statement from the current assistant manager that it is his intention to, stay on with the operations for ap dill.1n.' ss, of six e months. The applicants indicated that they,,.,.h,ave,,,,,enr�,o,fled,,..'i a Lilk"Or Servers co,u ind in. will provide the Village with a compl'eti. The Village Manager discussed some of the particulars of the Village's Liquor Ordinance and the general philosophy of the Village regarding the sale and consumption of alcohol -- especially by underaged persons. Mr. Janonis indicated that it was extremely important that the applicants establish very strict store policies for the presentation of appropriate identification to guard against underaged purchases. The consequences of violations of the Liquor Code were also discussed at length with the applicants. The required Liquor License application, supporting documentation and fees have been submitted to the Village and are in order. Appropriate background checks are being conducted. Mr. Huynh will be present to answer any questions you might have. lage of Mount Pros, ect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: DECEMBER 30, 1994 SUBJECT: RECALL ORDINANCE Attached is a copy of the revised Recall Ordinance for consideration under a first reading on January 3, 1995. The Ordinance was revised by Sheila Beary as directed by the Village Board members at the December 13 Committee of the Whole meeting. Ms. Beary will be in attendance at the Village Board meeting if any additional questions or comments arise at that time. This Ordinance will be put intoe final Ordinance format once it is ready for second reading Aon AVID STRAWL 0 OWN", DEC 30 `94 11: 57 FEDrE'P,.SEN & P. 51,113 ORP=ANCIR 2q0 - AN QFJD1NA1�%'1--'E AMEMTN" OF T1; VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPRCM BE IT ORDAIL'"ED By TF -E PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRVSTEES 0101 TH; VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECII'T, COOK CuuNTTY, ILLINOIS; o That Article V entitled "Othef Re3uleL r-11 ,C tee P. (Villa-ge Go, %rernme.,,nt Miscellaneous Provisions) of the by Villa;e Code of K:Ylant Prospectx as amended, be furtilodr amended add* -ng the jollnwin4 as SectLion 8-516* Section 9.516: Recall of elected officers. This section 4n the electorate to recall Officjndl-s shall test the power ' I the offJcialr- gtay be directly elected by them s45 thet e - Ora. , ,r.- n of f , cto the el ectorat Abe f'or their behavior I riasponsl I � to recall should serve as an The Qf the ejectt>ratA removing from, Qftice an 1,0,14S and, effective means fir e xp 4, <41 f ic,, , 4a:*Lje,- ,.I �,r. o. gugq ta j,. the 'trust of the elected ivr :L SpeCifol 11 ed, to be electo-rate. w1aiie no ,,Ic charges are requir lodged to-r-jjw:4,jly against an elected. mf fiCial tc sub'ec to recall, the individual reasons of each elector for, I ae-,r.nrdinglY shalom. be stgni ng a recall ��etiti011l Q:r 1 -70t deemed suffic,"Lent- cause for a recap.. Any elected Village with -�- the pO-v' sions 01 Officer may be recalled in accQrdance AW ,his sect iOn. .a. 'ding in the Actlo.n. Any registered vote resi Voter I r v*llage seeking two jr,4Lticite the rcc;�11 0' any elected I -File W'th . the v'LlIacre cle-rk a written officer may .-- I of inLtiit I io ` re under oal-v.j s t a t erke n t. bw in petition seeking recall of a named officer I r tilis oection. The Wuow acco"dance th the P-rov4zions recaj.1 oetition shall be rta,i[-Ace of intention to file a as follows: Notice iz hereby to tie citizens Of trite villdge of Ro=t 'Prospect, -:11inois, �that within the next 90 t qu t.L - days Rea pet one w.Lll I be cl, rcuiated re, es fig be held -o remove t�j= follow-ing that a recall 01P.Ction ofd mi , ci&l of the, 1I 1*11age I:jf 440ur , 416 f , z prospect office and ter". Of Office �:LCe i . . ........ . Of Off !Name 0 , Electe� 0 1 icial) Tucjk off i cc: I ficial Took in Present (D te f 4:, �, BArj%�6334.3 U/34/94 DEC 30 "94 11-:5e PEDERSEN & HOUPT P. 6/9 Terr Ends: Datc pretent Tqsrm 2r;-ag) Filed this CISLY 0 f 19 Circulation pt-L.Lud erida filed BY: (NaLme Elctcx An Elector of the Villag� Of mount Prospect SuBSC-AIDED and SWORN to before I days of th,= date Of filing Recall etit'on� Wi-.h2.,n 96 voter or rrn�ns a,,ctJng on the -a,c,6 Clerk a, 'j,e w3th th11-L votp-lris behalf shall e fl 3- 0%- of the 7rg-,g"LLstered vot,8�rs, written, PeL.Ltion s.*A'sTted a. bY I general of the V'illaLge &t the' t' Tr`e of the as*- 4,ddtio�ll.sady,t-L,tiQn, thall, 4:;�ona, ,„"dresses of the petitioners and sha.10.11 be in the following form: KBCALIA PETITION .L We, the undersigned electors of Olt: VillaLge of mount referendum for prospect herebY petition for a recall frovi tho the recall and removai of - � a, Mount office of the V'� Prospect, the temighlcft off -ice was enLf.-LtiCl On 19 and will exp -;re ozi 10 nd that the N. LA recall PLOPOsitiOn CL -he Village c Mount �p of 6- fed�t,o, he electol.- .5115 of Lhe Prospect, in the form required by Secti=� 8, village Code of mount Prospect. 2 W\22336.3 12120 'j4 DEC 30 `94 11:59-77D-PSSEN & HOUPT P. be -wr6callee-4i, an6- reMoved tX`CTM of the Village Of t'he off ice cz I- I tirtent to -'-d :!rom reappnin Mount P,rospt(,.:L and d*,s ualifie Office until aftexthe next general election to f jil the -vacar..ed uf f ATTI"ZRII I — C. Sworn Statement. Bahl page of the pttition ahall F be supported by a Sworn statement cifthe circ,�'.lator -on the following form; r,eg' steed voter uvorw- the It (rir culatorl S.0, naMe) a hf v jjj�&ge n,f M in,t pro0speact he;rel:�ycertifyat he attaced pe' d tha to the bes"L: o4:! MY my pre zencet Grp, genuine ane, I A knowledse and bellef the persoa8 so Sj,g"-n.1ng odere! at the 1,n � 'i red voters of the villm-ge of time of CaLs'no", g V-je�gistp -� e 4dences are M01,Int pros ect and that the respect 2. v d tha,t -nnrae were icslaced, On $add stated Ir. *I* ''na of I*:he the I o the day fol"Owin.�9 t,ition prior It I Pe' notit.:ft c ->f , intention t, -,c iiie orecal.,.Jp petl tior- -(�ircujator's Name ( Circ ,T.ilaotor Is Address) SUBSCRTSED ard swop -N to befoa!e I" me this day of I No- -9 1 I'll Notary Pubs. D. Statem-en.t. Each petition may, name no more 411pban One off icor whose recall 'is sc-ught and shall contain a brief and succinct. altatement, of the rea8ons 'for w1lich, recall is xought. more thanovaeWsLuch petJL-;,-,JLon naming dif f erent officers may be filed Lor a single recall election. B., Limitation- notice of intention to file recall Detition-or recall petition may be filed aga-inst any Wr op 4111 EMN26336.1 12/1-0,,94 W 3 - DEC 2-:0 '94 11:59 Pr-DERSEN & HOUPT P, eIA3 cloCted ofEioial withir, fhPfirat year O- durin.q the last six rrionths of ',-.he term of off ice of !--uch off; cia Within 3o rjays of the filing of a petitivn F, Election. r' which Trveets the rcquarementz of t" is -t,'�Ono, the president and Board of Trustees shall adopt a'n ordinaii�:ie ualling an election to e he"Id on the next general election date of Cook County or the State of 1 �,-sc; _llillois which brial".16 be not ' than 60 daye-- s fr,Tn t. �! P - date of said Qrdinance. G Not-fIce. Notice of saidelection and publication of a sample baliot in a newspaper- p"bli.5hed in, tho villag,& 'd, by shall be given Jn the manner provide law. The ballot for recall of an elected ofLl�;'al eh ll be In the fo],Iowing 4.orm: 1"' ca be recalled and Shall (Name oL.��= 1, 1 _.I, �'- I (Tic�le f 9f-9I'C§LL uL the TZ, removea ft= the office Of C- Village of Mount prospect, and disqualified fro i C) 4. rea,,oP oi-,.,).tment to that ffjce until* atter ter the, next lice? e7ection to fill the vacated ofzce? Dutles of village Clerk.. The ill clerk shall **#* -L#,I prepare a pamphler- for, diStrip tion.. c the voters setting forth, thio crate and ti of ejection and the reasons for initiating, recal].' proCedures in accordance - With th,Q petition, The p;qmph.1'et s1n.all a'sc contcain a 0,;fj'cer whose recall is responsIve statement by the so-uiaht. The reasons and respnmqr-- shall be limited to 500 words each. Said parnphlet sha"il be reviewed by the As Village Attorne,Y a-9 tc PQz-n a , cont'Art in compliance with th.-.'.s Art i C Ie. The Village clerk shall cause a copy` cf said pamphlet to be published in a rPwApape-,'.- of genezral circulation within the VIllLage not less, than 1.55 nor more than .100 days prior to the ante of the election. Procedures. The conduct.; of said election and arty challenge to tAa petjtjon or CUIlLeSt Of the elCCt'-Lon shall 'Ce as nearly as possible in accordance with the Provisions of the Election Code of tht State Of 111inois relating -pw-c the election of municipa'.1- efficers. Canvass of Returxis. The viilage,s canvassiuy Board shall canvass the results of the election_ache I ma5crity of the Votes cast shall be in faVo'ITf recall of the named,, officer, the office shall be declared vacant and the office SAal-L thea be f-illed ill - 4 MW DEC- 30 `94 12:00 PEDERSEN a �IOUPT the mannerprovided by law f o;.^ the Z'i I I - or VaCatncies. 1-1ing No off icer who has been recalled may be reappoln"C'ed to thatL office until of t-t4r the noxt election In Which the vacated off i%.I ,,e is fil,e, flied. K. Effective Date, The removal from office shall be effective immediatomly upon the Village Board's adopt;Lon If, of a reSol ut.*,on declaring the of f icial.. results of the electi'Lonrnrw h -ttanaing, any contec,t of the resulta of , such vote which �may be brought in the circuit court. Z If tw.�Ie. rs-=Rult Qf an at-firmat".Wvc vo,,-e on a recall 3 proposition is reversed by final order of ary court of competent jurisdiction,"l the recalled Qffici6L thereupon be restored to office and all rights to salary, pencion and01z milar benefits be restored .0-f and shall relate back to the date of removal a's'* if Such Officigal had not been oustitd uyuj� such final order. Any interim, appolIntment, to fill the 'vacancy created by the recall M'Ziall Llit;Z-eupon be However, &.1y, official acticne taken by the Village Roard with orb" such Int ut ;A Antee and all Qff,jcj,a', actions done 'b'y such interim appointee shall be valid and t'I"Inding. if d dta,.L-eated recall proposition is re%rersed by a final order of ar-Y court of competent jurisdiction, the official sr;all be removed from office as off the date of such final o -1 -der. ,S- E CT 12MLIWO - That all ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereo±k.� which, are in conflIct with the provisions cf this Ordinance are, to the extent of such conflict, expressly repealed, 82CTION 114PRR,�r ,,� That :his Crdinance sha"'11.1 be in full force and effect from and after its passAgg and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASS: PAASED AM APPROVRD thir,'m day Q f $ 15 94 . Villaqu :?Lesident- ATTEST : w Village. Clerk RW\28336.3 12/30/94 W !D - BH/caf 10/31/94 12/5/94 12/19/94 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 ENTITLEX "LICENSES AND PERMITS" QF THE VILLAQECODE OF MOUNT PR)QaP!* CT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: aECTIQN ONE: That Article 11 entitled "Issuance" of Chapter 10 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting a new Section 10.203 and renumbering Section 10.203 entitled "Signatures" to Section 10.204; so that hereafter said Article 11 of Chapter 10 of the Village Code shall be and read as follows: ISSUANCE SECTION: 10.201. Issuance of License 10.202. Investigation 10-203. Applicability 10.204. Signatures Sec. 10.201. Issuance of License. Within thirty (30) days of the receipt of any license application properly filled out on a form designated in Article I of this Chapter, the Village Clerk is hereby authorized to grant or renew any license contemplated under Section 10.101 of this Chapter for any period of time not exceeding one year to any applicant applying therefor on a form provided by the said Village Clerk, as specified in Article I of this Chapter, and upon payment by the applicant of the appropriate fees and/or bond as may be required in this Village Code. Sec. 10.202. Investigation. The Director of Community Development shall make or cause to be made an investigation in regard to such business inspection certificates to be granted in connection with all fire prevention, building and zoning matters. Sec. 10.203. APP1111cablill1ty. This Chapter 10 shall apply to all licenses which are required for the operation of any activity within the Village of Mount Prospect, except for Village vehicle licenses and dog licenses. Sec. 10.204. Signatures. Each such license contemplated in this Chapter shall bear the signature of the Village President and the Village Clerk. " ,SECTION - That Article III entitled "Conditions of License" of Chapter 10, as Chapter 10 Page 2 of 2 amended, is hereby further amended by said Article III in its entirety; so that hereafter said Article III of Chapter 10 shall be and read as follows: " ARTICLE III CONDITIONS OF LICENSE 10.301. Building and Premises 10.302. Current Financial Obligation to the Village 10.303. Change of Location 10.304. Non -transferability of License 10.305. License Term Sec. 10.301. SuNding and Premises. No license shall be issued for the conduct of any business, occupation or activity if the premises and building or vehicle, as the case may be, to be used for the purpose do not fully comply with all applicable provisions of this Code and Village Ordinances, building Fire Prevention, Building, Zoning, Fire and Health. Sec. 10.302. Current Financial obligation to the ViNage. No license shall be issued or renewed for the conduct of any business if the applicant, license holder, prior license holder for the same premises or any predecessor to the business interest of the current license holder has not paid any fees, fines, judgments or forfeitures due and owing to the Village of Mount Prospect. Sec. 10.303. Change of Location. Except as other provided in the Village Code of Mount Prospect, the location of any licensed business or occupation may be changed provided ten (10) days' notice thereof is given to the Village Clerk and that any increase in fees, as required by Article XXXIV of Chapter 11 of this Code, is paid. Sec. 10.304. Non-transfembility of License. No license issued under this Chapter shall be transferred to assigned or used by any person other than the one to whom it is issued, except as provided for under Article XXXIV of Chapter 11 of this Code. Sec. 10.304. License Teffn. Unless otherwise specified in this Village Code, all annual licenses set forth in Chapter 11 of this Village Code issued pursuant to this Chapter shall terminate on December 31 following such issuance. " CTI RAF, That Article IV entitled "Revocation or Denial" of Chapter 10 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto Section 10.404 entitled "Operating Without A License; Penalty"; so that hereafter said Section 10.404 shall be and read as follows: Sec. 10.404. Operating Without a License; Penalty. If any person operates a business or other activity without a required license or after renewal of license has been refused for any reason, that person shall be fined not less Chapter 10 Page 3 of 3 than One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) for each day of operation without a license. " ,qE.CMQNFO:UR: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of, 1995. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk 1* SOLUTION NO. 10*111119R1 9 to] ZILUJ R611, 011:112-= WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has prepared a Consolidated Plan, which includes a housing affordability and public service plan as well as an application for a Community Development Block Grant; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Pros is entering its eighteenth year as an entitlement community under the federaJ Community Development Block Grant Pro grarn;,and WHEREAS, in the past seventeen years the Village has used its Community Development Block Grant entitlement to implement various projects to address the cora munity,development and housing needs of low- and moderate -income and elderly residents, to reduce, and prevent the, occurrvoce of deterioration in the Central Area of the 'Fill age, to=iease� accessibility for the lwBicap: ped, sand to address other commurulity needs in conform ance with the objectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect allocated $393,000.00 for fiscal year 1995, and $17,493 in program income, all new allocations from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and program income; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees has determined that the Consolidated Plan and the use of C.D.B.G. funds can be of benefit in providing for resident's health, safety and welfare and in meeting the community development and housing needs of its citizens: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby approves the attached Consolidated Plan, which includes an allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds in the amount of $393,000.00 and program income funds in the amount of $17,493, all to the following projects for a total allocation of $410,493: Neighborhood Services Program $199500.00 Suburban Primary Health Care 112000.00 Elderly/Disabled Services Program 2,000.00 Neighborhood Street - Handicap Ramps 501,000.00 Residential Rehabilitation Loan Program 274,993.00 Transitional Living Program 6V000.00 General Administration 47.000.00 FY'95 C.D.B.G. FUNDS $410.4,93.02 SEMQN ]EW_Q; The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby authorizes the Village Manager to prepare and forward to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development a submission of Mount Prospect's "Consolidated Plan" in accordance with federal guidelines. This Plan includes an application for Federal Community Development Block Grant funds. SECTION JUREE: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this —day of "1995. ATTEST: MAYOR VILLAGE CLERK 00� #00� Loao� VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WELIAM J. LOONEY, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JANUARY 30, 1995 SUBJECT: CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND FY'95 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET The Plan Commission held a public hearing on January 18th to review and discuss the Village's Consolidated Plan which includes the FY95 Community Development Block Grant (C.D.B.G.) budget. The Plan Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Plan with minor modifications to the C.D.B.G. budget. The Consolidated Plan replaces the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Plan that the Village has submitted to HUD over the past few years. The Consolidated Plan is a policy document for the Village's housing and public service activities. It includes a one year and five year plan for the Village. The Plan Commission held a public hearing on December 7th to receive comments and proposals for the C.D.B.G. fiscal year. A total of 14 requests for funds were received. Staff reviewed each proposal, gathered additional information and forwarded their recommendation to the Plan Commission.' Attached is a summary of all proposals received. The total proposed budget for the coming fiscal year is $410,493. It consists of the FY '95 Community Development Block Grant allocation of $393,000 and $171493 in program income received from the repayment of single family housing rehabilitation loans. Listed below are the Plan Commission's funding recommendations for the FY95 C.D.B.G. Program. 1. Single Family Housing Rehabilitation activities .................... $274,993 2. Access to Care ....................... $111000 3. Resources for Community Living ............. $600 4.Senior Shared Housing $11400 5. Boxwood Advocacy Program $13,800 6. New Horizons ......... ........... $5)700 7. Transitional Living Program ......... $61000 8. Neighborhood Streets -Street Handicap Ramps ....... ............. $50,000 9. Administration 'S47 000 Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their February 7th meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions regarding this matter. MIES:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CONSOLIDATED PLAN This document contains the Village of Mount Prospect's housing affordability plan for the next five years and Community Development Block Grant Fiscal Year 1995 application. The Plan is divided into eight sections; Introduction, Summary of the Consolidated Plan, Community Profile, Five Year Strategy, Annual Plan, Monitoring Plan, Community Development Block Grant (C.D.B.G.) application and Appendix. The Village's Consolidated Plan is a new planning document required by the Cranston - Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act and replaces the Village's current Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), earlier Housing Assistance Plans (HAP's) and C.D.B.G. former applications. An approved Consolidated Plan is required of all states and units of local government that receive funding under certain Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs, including Community Development Block Grants. The Plan will explain Mount Prospect's housing market and inventory characteristics; estimate the housing assistance needs of its very low income, low income and moderate income families, including the needs of homeless individuals and families; assess the availability of housing resources for unassisted and assisted housing; develop a strategy and identify resources for meeting housing assistance needs over the next five years and specify how federal resources will be utilized to provide affordable housing for needy families and individuals. It also contains the Village's C.D.B.G. application for federal Community Development Block Grant -Entitlement funds. Mount Prospect's earliest housing plans took the form of zoning and comprehensive plan ordinances. In 1978, the issue of providing for the housing needs of lower-income residents was added to the Village's plans with HUD's approval of our first HAP. In 1991, Mount Prospect received HUD approval of it's first five year CHAS. Since 1978, Mount Prospect has benefitted from the HAP and CHAS process which has led to with the construction of 412 subsidized senior housing units and the rehabilitation of 233 single family houses and 277 rental/multi-family residential homes. This document is intended to provide a strategy for furthering the Village's efforts to provide lower income residents with affordable housing options in the community. The Village of Mount Prospect is hereby designating itself as the lead agency of this Consolidated Plan. In the process of preparing this plan, information was obtained from the 1980 and 1990 Census, studies and reports from State of Illinois agencies, the Northeas*tern Illinois Plan Commission, and testimony and reports received as a result of the CHAS /Consol i dated Plan public hearing process conducted by the Village of Mount Prospect Plan Commission on July 6, 1994. Consultations, recommendations, information and other assistance was also provided by the Suburban Area Agency on Aging., Northeastern Area Plan Commission, Resource Center for the Elderly, Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities, Northwest Housing Partnership, Catholic Charities, the Housing Authority of Cook County, Northwest Municipal Conference, Northwest Board of Realtors, National Alliance for the Mentally III (Arlington Heights), Northwest Cook Coalition for the Homeless, Homebuilders Association of Greater Chicago, Northwest Community Services, Village of Mount Prospect Human Services Department, Mount Prospect Public Health Officer., Public Action to Deliver Shelter (PADS), CERA -Northwest, Trinity United Methodist Church, Shelter Inc., Centennial Apartments, Huntington Towers Apartments, Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce, the League of Women Voters, the Village of Arlington Heights, City of Des Plaines, Village of Prospect Heights, City of Schaumburg, Village of Rolling Meadows, the Village of Buffalo Grove, the State of Illinois Departments of Public Health, Alcohol and Substance Abuse, Public Aid, DCFS and Aging. Others from whom information was requested in prior year CHAS and HAPS and utilized in the preparation of this document include NBD Bank, First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect, Bell Federal Savings, Mid -City National Bank, Savings of America, Talman Home Federal Savings and Loan, Glenkirk, Blue Jay Building Corporation, Home By Hemphill, Lexington Builders, National Lead Information Center, Affordable Housing Trust Fund, National Center for Lead -Safe Housing, Community Investment Corporation and State of Illinois Public Health., Alcohol and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Departments. The Village would like to thank these organizations for the information they provided in helping us ascertain the housing needs of children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, homeless persons, children identified as lead -poisoned and other residents having housing related needs. As lead agency, the Village will contact these organizations at least annual to enhance coordination and cooperation in implementing this plan and those of others. There were no problems or areas of contention encountered during the process of preparing this plan. C111"W2 P. * 'Dat* a,rtig, Proceu: Residents and concerned individuals were invited to participate and express their concerns from the very beginning of the Consolidated Plan process through to it's approval by the Village Board. A public notice was placed in the Mount Prospect Journal on June 15, 1994 announcing a public hearing before the Mount Prospect Plan Commission on July 6, 1994 at which time the Commission received public comments regarding affordable housing issues and concerns. A second hearing was held on December 7, 1994 in order to receive comments and proposals for the C.D.B.G. fiscal year 1995 program. That hearing was advertised on November 9, 1995. During this process, Village staff mailed a survey form to affordable housing related organizations in Mount Prospect and Cook County which asked them to identify what,, if any,, federal housing assistance programs they would be applying for during the 1995 federal fiscal year and over the next five years that would be located in Mount Prospect. This information was also incorporated into the plan. A third and final public hearing, advertised on the January 6, 1995 was held on January 18, 1995 before the Plan Commission. The purpose of the hearing was to receive public comments and a Commission recommendation for the final Consolidated Plan. The minutes of these hearings can be found in the Summary of Citizen Comments section of this plan. The Village Board then gave final approval of the document during their regular meeting on February 7, 1995. This process included the approval of the Citizen Participation Plan, attached as Attachment A. Rack,zawnd aail=dda: Mount Prospect's developmental history began in the early 1870's when E.C. Eggleston bought a tract of land from the farming families of Burke and Rooney. In those days, the principal economic activity was farming; with onions, beets and mushrooms being the principal crops. The Village of Mount Prospect area was formally incorporated as a village in 1917, with a population of 100. Most of the Village's population and economic growth occurred between 1950 and 1980, when the number of residents grew from 4,009 to 52,634. Today, Mount Prospect is primarily a suburban commuter town with a sound business environment. Some of the Village's major employers are business' operating out of Randburst Shopping Center, Multigraphics, First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect, Met Life and Nutrasweet Company. We do not foresee any strong economic trends in the near future that will affect or change housing affordability. Demographic trends are described in the following section. ,D=0,,gmph1cs: The 1990 Census indicated that the Village's population is 53,170. This represents a one percent increase from the 1980 Census figure of 52,634. Data from the 1980 Census incorporated in Mount Prospect's 1988 Three Year HAP notes that of the 1324 low income renter households in Mount Prospect, 721 had very low incomes and 603 had low incomes. By 1990, the number of low income renters had grown to 1233 and the number of very low income renting residents increased to 2075. There were 6063 total renting households in the Village in 1980. Of the 12,706 homeowner occupied units in 1980 in the Village, the Census shows none of them were occupied by low income or very low income households. The 1990 Census indicates there were 4809 moderate income homeowners. In the past ten years Mount Prospect has experienced a significant change in it's racial and ethnic make-up. For *instance, the number of Asian and Pacific Islander residents grew to 3,417, up from 1,490 in 1980. The Black residential population grew from 331 to 606 during the same ten year period. The increase in the Hispanic Origin population increased from 1,225 in 1980 to 3,411 in 1990. The American Indian population also rose over the. same period from 52 to 73. These increases primarily occurred in Census Tract 8027.01, 8050.02, 8051.07, 8051.08 and 8051.11. The following is a summary of the minority and low and moderate percentages for the residents in each of these Census Tracts: Census Tract % of Minority % of Low/Moderate Population Income Residents 8027.01 23% 17% 8050.02 21% 33% 8051.07 34% 44% 8051.08 26% 37% 8051.11 29% 38% See the attached maps for the census tract areas where there are concentrations of minorities and low income residents. rTHE VILLAGE OF MnUNT PRnSPFCT_ II LINOIS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS CONSOLUDATED PLAN 1"s For the planning period of May 1, 1995 thru December 31, 1999 and includes the Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Block Grant Fiscal Year 1995 application Prepared By: Michael Sims, Planner Planning Department Village of Mount Prospect Tel: (708) 392-6000 Ext. 5313 Mount Prospect is a mature community, with approximately 97% of it's buildable parcels developed. Thus, the Village expects little population growth in the near future. The largest remaining undeveloped parcels are mainly zoned for industrial and business uses. Uukt, jwd Jnyn, = Chu =,ri-stiles: According to the Census Bureau, the number of housing units in Mount Prospect increased by 1,436 over the past ten years, from 19,513 in 1980 to 20,949 in 1990. Almost all of that increase was in owner occupied homes. The number of owner occupied units increased from 12,706 to 14,009 during the past decade. Over the same time period, occupied rental units increased by 209 units, for a total of 6272. The 1990 Census indicated that the vacancy rate for owners occupied units was 0.8 % while for rental -occupied units the rate was 5.8 %. Staff's analysis of the housing market in Mount Prospect has concentrated on cost, housing conditions, overcrowding and availability. The biggest housing problem and impediment to fair housing choice in Mount Prospect is cost. This will be discussed in the following paragraphs. In general, most owner occupied housing units are in good condition and should remain so at least in the near future. Staff believes most property owners will continue to maintain their properties and protect this asset. The Village has implemented a Landlord/Tenant Ordinance, which requires an annual inspection and the correction of code violations in all rental properties. The most serious deteriorated housing is in the apartment complexes located in the south end of the Village and in the Boxwood neighborhood. We would note that overcrowding is a problem, primarily in rental units. Rental units are readily available, as has been verified by information contained in the preceding paragraph. Most of these units were built in the 1970's or earlier and are not handicapped accessible. Many are small and would be difficult to make accessible. The cost of owning a single family detached home in Mount Prospect poses a major problem for low and very low income households. With very little buildable land remaining and a low vacancy rate, there appears little chance that single family detached home prices will drop. Condominium and townhome ownership seems more likely for low income and very low income households. Staff estimates a small number of units may start as low as $50,000 with more being available in the $80,000 to $100,000 price range. Such housing represents a good opportunity for first time homeowners to live in Mount Prospect. Condominium and townhomes provide a good housing value and a way of accumulating equity for acquiring future housing or meeting other financial objectives. W Ham eownerstuip, and renting in Mount Prospect pose serious housing affordability concerns and cost burdens for very low, low and moderate income households. The following Housing Affordability Chart shows how housing costs financially effect these households. Housing Affordability Chart HLT Defined Extremely Very Low $6,768 $6,9768 ou hol ` of Lwow Income Income Low Income Moderate Income Annual Income $11,430 $19-9050 $30,450 $329950 Net Annual Income $7,9534 $119430 $20,097 $21,744 Monthly Net Income $628 $952 $19674 $19812 HOMEOWNERSHIP: $200 $200 $200 $200 Purchase Price $759000 $751,000 $75.1000 $759000 .Mortgage $71,250 $71,250 $71,250 $719250 Downpayment 5% 5% 5% 5% Other Annual housing costs* $29404 $29440 $25400 $29444 Mortgage Interest Rate 9% 9% 9% 9% Monthly mortgage costs $575 $575 $575 $575 Other Monthly housing costs* $200 $200 $204 $200 'Dotal Monthly $775 $775 $775 $775 housing costs Housing cost % of 155% 81% 46% 42% Net Income Housing cost % of 81% 49% 31% 28% Gross Income : ZI M + Median Annual Rent: $6,768 $6,768 $6,768 $6,9768 Monthly Rent $564 $5+64 $564 $564 Other Annual housing costs* $2,)400 $29400 $29400 $2,9400 Other Monthly housing costs* $200 $200 $200 $200 Total Monthly $764 $764 $764 $764 housing costs Housing Costs % of 122% 80% 45% 42% Net Income Housing Costs % of 67% 48% 30% 28% Gross income * Homeowner and renting housing costs include utility expenses. It does not include property insurance, principal mortgage insurance, taxes, home repairs or property owner association fees, downpayments or security deposits. f Mount Prospect's Three Year HAP in 1988 showed the greatest housing need was for new elderly housing with rental subsidies. This need remains and was confirmed by testimony from Centennial Apartments and Evangelical Health Systems during a CHAS public hearing on July 10, 1991 and the HUD Section 202 application process, including inquiries from Mount Prospect senior citizens, in 1992. Other testimony from the Housing Authority of Cook County, Suburban Area Agency on Aging and the Resource Center for the Elderly confirmed a need for senior shared housing and rental assistance programs for very low income seniors. Since most of Mount Prospect's buildings were constructed before 1978, approximately 19,500, may have lead based paint. Of these, perhaps 2145 (11 %)are occupied by very low income residents and 2535 (13%) by low income citizens. The Village's Health Officer has noted there have not been any lead poisoning cases reported in Mount Prospect and a recent water survey indicates Mount Prospect's Water System had a lead level below 15 parts per billion in 59 survey sites out of 60, an excellent rating. Public.,Hmii2g: Mount Prospect does not have any public housing projects that can be assisted under the Comprehensive Grants Program. This grant is solely for the use of public housing authorities. However, there are a number of federally assisted rental programs currently operating. The Housing Authority of Cook County reports there are presently 67 families and 25 elderly, disabled, or handicapped residents benefiting from the Authority's Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments Program. Centennial Apartments and Huntington Apartments are providing 412 units of senior subsidized housing. Centennial Apartments has 198 units, of which 192 are one bedroom units and 6 are two bedroom. Huntington Towers Apartments contains 214 units, of which 128 are studios, 75 are one bedroom and 11 are two bedroom. Both are currently full with a normal waiting period of two to five years. Federal Preference Rules allow for individuals living in substandard housing, those involuntarily displaced, or persons paying more than 50% of their income for rent and utilities to receive priority in gaining access to subsidized housing. Centennial Apartments is only receiving applications for the preference list. Mount Prospect seniors on this list typically wait from 6 to 8 months. HQmdus aniLftnou lba,=nd, mdtb, me1c,asnus I ides-, Serv, The homeless population in Mount Prospect is estimated.. to be rather small. The 1990 Census counted 13 homeless individuals, all living in group quarters. A local volunteer shelter organization, Public Action to Deliver Services (P.A.D.S.), which provides evening shelter and meals during the colder months of the year for the northwest suburbs, has reported housing up to 80 individuals a night this year. This number of guests is close to the maximum capacity of the P.A.D.S. program. This year, P.A.D.S. has seen an increase in the number of guests with a mental illness. Northwest Suburban P.A.D.S. has a policy of not seeking governmental support. The Human Services Department of the Village of Mount Prospect assists residents with housing counseling, emergency financial assistance, food pantry and information on other %W' resources. They plan homeless and other programs and are the lead department in organizing Mount Prospect Visions activities. Human Services does not operate any housing units. All other housing units and services are provided by social service agencies whose service centers are located outside the corporate limits of Mount Prospect. For instance, CEDA- Northwest provides 11 transitional units for families in crisis in the northwest suburbs. These consist of 7 two bedroom units, 3 one bedroom units and a home. In 1994 it opened the Wright House, which provided an additional 11 unit transitional apartment building with affordable rent. The agency also provides supportive services, including day care, group support and employment counseling. CEDA-Northwest has requested that Mount Prospect include in this plan a priority for the rehabilitation or construction of additional transitional rental units in Mount Prospect. The Harbor provides emergency and transitional shelter for runaway youth. The agency has 12 emergency beds available at one location and 12 additional beds in 3 transitional units. The Harbor provides comprehensive services aimed at reuniting families. The agency is interested in developing a specialized, licensed foster care home and a second stage rental unit for supervised independent living in the near future in Mount Prospect or other northwest communities in their service area. Shelter Inc. offers shelter and services for abused and neglected youth. Their available housing facilities include a 6 bedroom unit in Arlington Heights and a 5 bedroom home in Schaumburg. A new 8 bed home in Palatine is being built in Palatine. Shelter Inc., and The Harbor have extensive prevention programs which operate from community schools, in cooperation with local police departments. They have no plans for building in Mount Prospect. Catholic Charities does not own any housing units but rents 4 units for families in need of shelter in Arlington Heights. They offer two programs specifically aimed at the homeless or near homeless. One offers job training, placement and a rent subsidy for up to six months. The other provides educational opportunities, counseling and Section 8 rental assistance. Catholic Charities would like to apply for a HUD SHP (Supportive Housing Program) grant for a 15 to 20 unit home and is asking that this be included in Mount Prospect's Consolidated Plan. The Resource Center for the Elderly operates a senior shared housing program designed to provide elderly homeowners with an able bodied renter who also provides assistance in the maintenance of the home and/or care to the owner. This program is currently operating in Mount Prospect and will likely grow with the aging population. WINGS, located in Des Plaines, provides individual and group counseling and comprehensive services to women and women with children in their seven apartments located in Palatine, Park Ridge and Des Plaines. The agency serves the north and northwest suburbs and has had a rapid service request demand in the past year. WINGS may be seeking a FEMA Emergency Shelter Grant to provide additional services and facilities and has requested that this request be provided in this plan. Two years ago the Hope Center opened as a day shelter, providing the homeless with medical assessments, mental health and legal services, job counseling and a location for the homeless to receive mail and clothing. The Center is located in the Wheeling Township building No federal funds are being sought at this time. The City of Chicago Health Department is the main agency that coordinates and provides funding for 12 agencies that address AIDS and related disease issues. The agency distributes funds from the Ryan White Program as well as manages prevention, education and testing of AIDS. The Ryan White Program uses federal funds for AIDS victims for health services, housing, food and respite care. Cook County also has a special AIDS patient program, which has hospital and meal services. Many AIDS patients also receive financial support from Pubic Aid. Since 1982 there have been 25 reported cases of AIDS in Mount Prospect. Seventeen of these are now deceased. Area mental health counseling services come from Salvation Army, Kenneth Young Services, OMNI Youth Services, Youth and Family Services and The Bridge. Each has a two to three month backlog of persons with mental illnesses seeking services. The Northwest Mental Health agency operates the only group home available to mentally ill Mount Prospect residents. The State of Illinois' Department of Mental Health Code regulates service in how clients are to be treated. It governs such items as housing, rehab services, care, abuse, neglect and confidentiality. We have not been able to verify the 1990 Census count of homeless people and families in Mount Prospect nor determine their racial or ethnic status. As was stated earlier, the 1990 Census indicates the Village's homeless population is small and their needs are currently being met with the resources of the above mentioned agencies. However, the number of homeless is increasing and area agencies are generally seeing a need to increase facilities and services. The number of "Near Homeless" households has been estimated by the Village Human Services Department to be approximately 500. This number is based on the 1994 CHAS estimate of persons with incomes under 30% of the median four person family income and assumes 30% of these households are in danger of becoming homeless. There isn't any permanent housing for homeless persons or rural homelessness in Mount Prospect. * L HOUSIng for Non-Homdm, and Testimony received from the Alliance for the Mentally Ill and Glenkirk (homes for the developmentally disabled) have revealed a need for additional group homes and services for their clients. The Alliance for the Mentally Ill has reported a need for group homes in Mount Prospect (with supportive services) to begin providing housing and services to an estimated 265 individuals. Glenkirk reported their agency has a 10 year waiting list for housing and services it provides to it's clients with developmental disabilities. The services needed to support these group homes include transportation, counseling, therapy and support systems. These are coordinated with providers or supplied by the primary agency. Q1h,cr H.ous*,ng Needs: A► number of agencies and planning organizations identified a pressing need for affordable housing to meet the needs of the "working poor" in Mount Prospect. Glenkirk noted they employ 300 people, many of whom are entry level direct care workers, cooks, housekeepers, food service and maintenance workers. In 1989, 40% of these employees had to drive more than 15 miles to get to work because of the cost of housing in Mount Prospect. Studies performed by the North Eastern Illinois Plan Commission have identified a job/housing imbalance in the northwest suburbs. This problem was also identified by NBD Bank. Housing rehabilitation assistance is needed primarily for single parent households, the elderly and homes with disabled members in both owner occupied and rental units. Our current C.D.B.G. funded rehabilitation programs are adequately meeting the needs of home owners but expanded funding will be needed to meet the growing demand for these programs. Mount Prospect is almost entirely built-up and little population growth is anticipated. There will not be significant changes in housing needs or inventory in the next five years. We do not expect changes in employment patterns to change housing needs or characteristics.. i,e& Assaismot: The housing needs and ability of very low-income, low-income and moderate -income households to obtaining housing was clearly addressed in the section of this report under Market and Inventory Characteristics. Also discussed in that section were the issues of cost burden, overcrowding, and housing conditions. The main identified problem was the cost of housing for all four income groups, in both the rental and homeownership market. Data from the U.S. Census 'indicates the residents needing the most assistance are elderly homeowners, large families and elderly renters. The Village has not been able to, differentiate between the housing needs of minority and non -minority residents as such data is not available. The public housing authority (PHA) that serves Mount Prospect is the Housing Authority of Cook County. The PHA has reported they have about 5000 people on their Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments Program. Application were last opened in September, 1991 and will be reopened in 1996. Applications for the handicapped, elderly and disabled were opened in March of 1994. The estimated waiting time for those on the current list is two to three years. At the present time, 96 percent of applicants seeking Section 8 housing meet federal priority criteria, which are: 1. the applicant was displaced by a federally funded program, 2. the applicant's household income is less than 50% of median income, or 3. the applicant currently lives in substandard housing. As was mentioned earlier, Mount Prospect's most serious housing problem is affordability. This includes the affordability of home purchasing. Since there appears to be no indication that the price of housing will fall to where it will be affordable, the public sector solution to the problem must involve assistance with downpayments, interest reduction, principal reduction financing or federal tax credit assistance. me Four segments of our community with special housing needs are the elderly, mentally ill, developmentally disabled and special homeless segments. Many of our able bodied elderly own large homes. Some would prefer to live in smaller homes or a condominium but feel they do not have the resources to make the switch. Many do not need supportive housing services now but are looking for a home that will allow for such services in the future. Some could be classified as frail elderly and in need of a smaller, more maintenance free unit. The need for housing for the mentally ill, developmentally disabled and homeless women, women with children, families and runaway youth has been discussed. The Village has reviewed the housing needs of current residents - and those who are expected to reside in the community to determine if there will be significant changes in housing need. It is unlikely there will be significant changes in the Village's housing stock since there is little buildable land within the corporate limits for new construction and the community has a stable and desirable housing market. ,Nature and E2jigat Qf Home The 1990 U.S. Census estimated the Village's sheltered homeless population at 13. Ten of these were adults and three were children. As was mentioned earlier, the local volunteer PADS program is now serving up to 80 homeless individuals in the northwest Cook County suburbs a night. Since PADS is nearing capacity, the Village recognizes the need for additional shelter and services including day care, laundry, mail, phone, employment training, medical care and counseling, In addition to homeless needs, there will be a need for medical treatment, mental health facilities, drug addiction services, counseling, employment training and group homes for those fleeing from domestic violence, the mentally ill, the developmentally disabled, those with drug addictions, homeless youth and residents diagnosed with AIDS and related diseases. Needs -of Pxrsons ihm =,ed wid-H=tlessness: The needs of those threatened with homelessness can, in many instances, be handled by existing agencies if they are adequately funded and have available facilities. Assistance through a combination of counseling, job training, day care and rental or mortgage payment assistance would be extremely beneficial to this group. Rmlatignawith S2=* at,, N=ds,!cbtr,1,1J=, 1J, Table 1-E of the Village's 1994 CHAS reveals our best estimate, based on the 1990 Census, of the number of residents who can be classified as elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with drug addictions and residents with AIDS or related illnesses and in need of housing and supportive services. In each case, the Village believes additional housing and services will be needed in the near future to assist these residents in living in Mount Prospect. I i 1 IF, ��F 12:300!111,11 11, � 1, 11MR53 Acquisition: The only acquisition contemplated will be for a federal Section 202 senior housing building. No site has been identified and no Village property is available. 11 Rehabilitation: The Village's C.D.B.G. funded housing rehabilitation programs will continue to benefit low, very low and moderate -income residents. These programs provide a 0 % home repairs loan and a 50% subsidy for home weatherization improvements on owner occupied dwellings. Additional financial assistance may be sought from the HOME program or local lenders. New Construction: A new Section 202 senior housing building would be the only development that would involve new construction. Homebuyer Assistance: Using federal HOME funds and the resources of private lenders, the Village may seek to develop a first-time homebuyers program. The Village currently participates in the Illinois Housing Development Authority's Mortgage Credit Certificate first-time homebuyer program. Rental Assistance: The Village will continue to encourage the use of the Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments program for eligible residents as a way of lowering the cost of rental housing. The Section 8 Program allows selected renters to pay 30% of their monthly income for rent. The balance is paid by HUD. A similar program could be developed using HUD federal HOME funds. Homeless Assistance: Homeless programs contemplated over the next five years include utilizing the FEMA Emergency Shelter Grant for eligible homeless activities, including those for homeless women and women with children and HOME funds for the acquisition and/or rehabilitation of a rental property and for facilities for run away youth, the mentally ill or developmentally disabled. Homeless Prevention: HUD Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments or emergency financial payment should be available for those households and individuals facing hopelessness due to no fault of their own except their loss of income. NON-FEDERAL PUBLIC: STATE PROGRAMS: No planned assistance except federal HOME funds being administered by the State. See the above FEDERAL PROGRAMS section. LOCAL PROGRAMS: Mount Prospect operates a code enforcement program and a number of social services, mentioned earlier, from it's Human Resources Division which address needs for rental assistance and homeless prevention. 19 PRIVATE RESOURCES: FOR-PROFIT: Local lenders may be solicited to participate in a first-time homebuyers program and a housing rehabilitation program. Please see the FEDERAL PROGRAMS section. NON-PROFIT: Non-profit organization, such as CERA -Northwest, WINGS, Catholic Charities and The Harbor, may utilize their own funds in matching other funds and to provide gap financing. I Public bbic'esAf I fectin-e,,,'Hous,l,n2.,A,ffor&'bl,lltv The Village's review of government policies that affect housing centered on taxing policies, land use controls, building codes and fees. We did not look into growth policies or the return on residential investment since Mount Prospect has no active growth limit policies, local rent control or return on investment regulations. Mount Prospect's local government has a taxing rate of 91 cents per $100.00, which represents about 10% of the total property tax rate of $9.12 per $100.00. This rate is comparable to other communities in the area. Local school districts receive approximately 60% of these taxes. Mount Prospect is located in Cook County, the only county in Illinois to tax residential property at a lower rate than businesses and industries. Residential owner occupied property here is assessed at 16% of market value. Apartments are assessed at 22%. The commercial and industrial rates are at 38 % and 36 %. All other counties in the state have a single property tax assessment of 33 %. This does not mean actual residential taxes are lower, for the current property tax multiplier is 1.9946 per $100.00. Surrounding counties have multipliers of just over 1.0. Village land use and zoning ordinances allow residential units to be occupied by up to five unrelated individuals or up to eight unrelated individuals if in a supervised group homes setting. Group homes are permitted by ordinance and does not need special use approval. The Zoning Code is proposed to be amended to permit multiple uses on a single property in the Central Commercial (downtown) district. Housing units are not permitted above businesses in any other district. "Granny" units are not permitted on any residential lots. The minimum lot width for detached residential lots in the R-1 district (single family residence) is 65' and 75' on comer lots. The Village Development Code requires that all residential streets be built 31' back to back of curb and that storm water detention facilities be built on all residential developments exceeding 2 acres in size and/or receiving a lot coverage variation. The building code reflects both national professional construction standards as well as state and federal government requirements. Some of the requirements of these Codes can increase the cost of housing. For instance, federal handicap accessibility standards now state that new housing must be convertible for handicap use. Thus, plumbing must be installed at standard heights as 13 well as be adjustable for handicap use. Halls and restrooms must be sized to meet handicap standards and wheelchair requirements. Safety related code items also negatively effect housing affordability. For instance, less expensive pipe material, like plastic, is not permitted because of the toxic smoke hazard it may present during a fire and the potential health problems when used for drinking water. The Village fire code requires residential buildings of over 5000 S.F. to have fire sprinkling systems. Mandatory fire wall construction for multiple unit construction also increases construction cost. The electrical code prohibits the use of Rornex and other less expensive wiring and notes that wiring must be in conduit. Mount Prospect will consider changes in its codes and policies that effect housing affordability as long as they do not compromise the building and/or development in terms of health or safety. Developer fees include permit fees, development fees, bonds and letters of credit. Permit fees cover the cost of structural, plumbing, and electrical inspections as well as tapping on to sewer and water utilities. Development fees include a one time donation to the Village to cover immediate and future service needs of the residents of the development. Bonds and Letters of Credit are used to ensure developments are constructed according to Code and approved plans. This plan is designed to cause little or no displacement. If displacement should occur, the Village of Mount Prospect will utilize the relocation services of the Minority Enterprise Resources Corporation (M.E.R.C.), other similar agency or its own resources to locate suitable housing for those effected. The Village will provide such assistance as required by local, state and federal law. In the Market and Inventory Characteristics section of this plan, the major problem in fair housing choice was identified as the cost of housing. A potential problem is illegal discriminatory practices. In order to protect citizens from such practices, the Village has adopted a Fair Housing Ordinance that identifies illegal activities, provides a means of redress and requires a local poster with a complaint phone number be displayed where housing transactions occur. To date, the Village has not received any formal fair housing complaints. PJi0hJtY',Non-HW$.1njz C=munity N=d,s,,,-, In addition to housing needs, the Village, through it's public hearing and survey process, has identified non -housing community development needs. These include primary health care services, neighborhood recreational opportunities, after school and summer learning and recreational activities, a senior shared housing program, street improvements and additional park land and park land development. These needs are further identified in the attached Community Development Block Grant -Entitlement application and the Village's street reconstruction plan as prepared by the Village Engineering Division. Park improvements needs have been noted in Village Visions Committee meetings and a Plan Commission meeting. With the approval of this plan and C.D.B.G. application, approximately 20 households may be brought out of poverty. See the Five Year Strategy and Annual Plan for details on how this will be accomplished. ku In summary, Mount Prospect's five year strategy involves the following purposes and objectives: 1. Promote the construction of new affordable housing for low income and very low income elderly so to alleviate the rental cost burden of these individuals in our community. 2. Recognize the special needs of elderly low income and very low income elderly residents and support the provision of these so those in need can live in a safe and healthy environment. 3. Promote homeownership opportunities. 4. Promote rental assistance to alleviate rental cost burdens, including severe cost burdens, experienced by low and very low income individuals and families, especially large families. 5. Support the development of group homes serving the mentally ill, developmentally disabled and other group homes recognized as being important in resolving the housing and service needs of Mount Prospect residents. 6. Support the provision of transitional housing and related services for homeless individuals and families that provide self-sufficiency skills in a supervised or case management delivery system. As noted in HUD's Consolidated Plan instruction manual, the purpose of this section is to present priorities for the investment of private and public funds in housing, both rental and homeowner, and services based on the needs identified in the Community Profile. The public funds will be received under the National Affordable Housing Act. These priorities are designed to complement the Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect, assist residents in finding decent and affordable housing in all residential areas of the Village, address the needs of special populations in the community and carry out the purposes and meet the goals of the Act. The Village's priority analysis and development strategy calls for all resources to be available village -wide and among all eligible residents within the Village. A priority should be made for serving low and very low income elderly and large families. Mount Prospect has identified priority needs it will address in the next five years based on the data and needs documented in the Community Profile section of this document. These are: "R senior citizen housing with rental assistance, special housing needs of the elderly, housing for first time home buyers and employees working in Mount Prospect, assisted rental housing, housing with services for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled and transitional housing for the homeless. The strategy for the implementation of each follows. 1 'Rental Assistuce. I Su*Qr HQu,s*nq__,Rehah'1j,t t* . Asa'stan Wd, &bsidized &n2JLAss1`m=: This priority was noted after a review of housing needs shown in the Three Year HAP of 1988, Five Year CHAS of 1991, CHAS public hearing testimony and reports and the 1990 Census. The Census reported a considerable increase in the elderly population over the age of 60 in Mount Prospect, from 11.38% of the population in 1980 to 17.64% in 1990 and that 675 elderly renters in 1990 had incomes below 30% of median income. I - PrioriZU. To provide new construction housing for elderly low income residents. Very low-income (0% to 50% of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80 % of MFI) - Elderly. Five Year Results: Identify site for 75 units of new Section 202 or similar program units with a Section 8 Set -Aside. Institutional Capacity.- Mount Prospect is *interested in supporting a Section 202 application but has not identified a satisfactory site for the development. Village C.D.B.G. funds may be used to assist in this project. Service agencies and organizations will be utilized in providing needed services to residents. 17. Prior iZL�_. To address the special needs of elderly low income and very low income residents in various housing settings. Very low-income (0% to 50 % of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80 % of MFI) - Elderly. Five Year Results: 10 units of newly created shared senior housing. 25 units of rehabilitated senior homes. 25 units of Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payment. Institutional Capacity: The Resource Center for the Elderly operates a senior shared housing program. Village staff will work with the agency in promoting this housing activities. Mount Prospect's C.D.B.G. program has offered housing rehabilitation loans and subsidies for the past 13 years and will continue to offer these to very low and low income residents, including elderly homeowners. The Housing Authority of Cook County provides Section 8 housing assistance payments in Mount Prospect. Over the years there has been an increase in the number of payments to senior citizens. The Village supports the PHA continuing to provide such payments. W* Eir.sLTj=Lm,1n=e H=ebuygn Assistance: As was noted in the Community Profile section, it is becoming increasing difficult for low income residents to buy and live in owner occupied housing in Mount Prospect. The Village of Mount Prospect believes that workers whose jobs are in the Village should be able to find affordable housing in Mount Prospect. Current homeowners can normally move into Mount Prospect using the equity income received from the sale of their home. First time purchasers have difficulty with down payments and the monthly mortgage payment. PrioriIX3: To provide housing opportunities for first time low income hornebuyers. Examples of the housing problem can be found in the Community Profile section. Low-income (51 % to 80 % of MFI) - All renting households. Five Year Results: Assist 25 households in becoming first time homebuyers. Institutional Capacity: Funding would come from the Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME). In 1995, Mount Prospect will discuss with neighboring communities their interest in organizing together a first time homebuyers program and organize needed resources in the community. Funding availability is critical to achieving this priority. C.D.B.G. funds may be used to bring project homes up to Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and Village Code. Local banks have become involved in the general affordability issue and will be asked to participate. Mount Prospect will also continue participation in the Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, operated by the Illinois Housing Development Authority, which provides federal tax credits to eligible Mount Prospect first time homebuyers. for Vervlm.lnomc and ID -w Incomt, Rea"dots: High market rate rents in Mount Prospect and the northwest suburbs often render rental housing for very low income and low income residents unaffordable. One way to bridge the affordability gap is through the Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments Program. While the program is independently administered by the Housing Authority of Cook County, the Village of Mount Prospect must take an active role in moitoring the impact of the Section 8 Program on the community. This monitoring should take the form of (1 ung property owners and managers about the rights and obligations of landlords and tenants under the program and (2) working with the Housing Authority of Cook County to insure that over concentrations of low income households do not occur in either neighborhoods or geographic areas of the Village. Another potential source of rental assistance payments is the Federal HOME Program. Poority To promote the responsible use of financial rental assistance program throughout the Village for Mount Prospect residents. Very low- income (0% to 50% of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80% of MFI) - All renting households. 17 Five Year Results: Work closely with the Housing Authority of Cook County in the management of tenant based voucher and certificate programs for low income and very low income Mount Prospect. renters. Institutional Capacity: Mount Prospect has contact with and knowledge of all rental properties in its corporate boundaries through the licensing requirem,ents of the Landlord/Tenant Ordinance. Staff will contact rental property owners or managers and inform them of the rules and regulations governing participation in the Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments Program. HUD C.D.B.G. funds may be used with those of private lenders and others to rehabilitate selected rental units. H,,QusM'2.fbr,�ft Mentally III udDuch Ily D*Zb1gd: The local National Alliance for the Mentally III organization has indicated a need for group homes over the next couple of years and is pursuing several funding sources to finance these homes. Additional support may be needed to rehabilitate the selected properties for appropriate use by the occupants. Special services will need to be provided. Similar needs have been identified for the developmentally disabled. The need for this housing and associated services was discussed in the Community Profile section. n* o r i tv. 5 TO provide financial assistance in the purchase or rehabilitation of housing for the mentally ill and or developmentally disabled. Very low-income (0% to 50% of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80% of MFI) - All mentally ill and developmentally disabled. Five Year Results: Assist the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill or similar organizations with the purchasing or rehabilitation of a residential home for use as a community residence for the mentally ill,) or assist other such organizations in providing similar housing and services for the mentally ill or developmentally disabled. Institutional Capacity: Mount Prospect intends to assist the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill or similar organization with the purchase or rehabilitation of a home in Mount Prospect to be used as a supervised community residence for the mentally ill or developmentally disabled. Funding for the project may be from Mount Prospect's C.D.B.G. funds, the State of Illinois Mental Health Department, corporate donations, HUD's Section 811 program or other appropriate sources. Prproviding transitional housing iorizLfi: To assist qualified agencies in to p I residents with emphasis on providing self-sufficiency skills and in a caw management or other appropriate setting. Very low-income 18 (0 % to 50 % of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80 % of MFI) - All homeless residents. Five Year Results: Assist qualified agencies in applying for financing and obtaining other assistance in opening transitional housing units in Mount Prospect. Institutional Capacity: Various experienced and successful organizations, including WINGS and CERA -Northwest, have seen a need for additional transitional housing units. Mount Prospect believes such a housing unit in the Village could be an asset to the community in serving its residents. It should be noted that the above indicated priority activities will have a positive effect in meeting housing affordability needs in Mount Prospect, and will have a positive effect on the needs of the homeless and near homeless. The high cost of Mount Prospect's housing is primarily due to its location in the Greater Chicago Area, close proximity to major highway systems and O'Hare International Airport, and the availability of the Chicago Northwestern Commuter Rail System that links Mount Prospect to the Chicago Loop. Staff has reviewed Village development requirements and believes, on a whole, they do not pose major impediments to achieving affordable housing. Even so, Mount Prospect is actively involved in finding ways to address the housing affordability issue. For example, the Village's Zoning Ordinance has been amended to permit households of up to 8 persons with developmental disabilities, and paid staff, to occupy a single dwelling unit. Staff is currently in the process of updating the Zoning and Development Ordinances and will be recommending to the Village Board approval of, among other things, a new Downtown zoning district which will permit mixed uses. Staff will pay special attention in our review of the zoning ordinance to insure that it does not promote concentrations of low income households but does affirmatively address housing affordability as well as health and safety issues. There are no pending tax or fee increases requested by the Village except for a proposed increase in Development fees that have not been changed in the past 11 years. Future requests will be reviewed, in part, as to their 'effect on the affordability of housing in the Village. Mount Prospect does not have any court orders or HUD sanctions that affect the provision of affordable housing. # P To"ect, 113yDIveMent: The two senior citizen housing projects in Mount Prospect, Centennial Apartments and Huntington Towers Apartments, represent the only federally assisted housing here. Both are privately owned and well managed, and the Village sees no benefit to the residents in their becoming involved in their own management or their participation in a homeownership program. There are no public housing projects in Mount Prospect. 19 Mount Prospect will apply for and administer programs to be funded with federal CDBG Entitlement funds. It will also work with adjoining communities in creating a first-time homebuyers program. Funding for the first time homebuyers program may be sought from local lending 'institutions and either the State of Illinois or Cook County's HOME Program. Please refer to the institutional structure narrative included in each priority noted above. They explain how each activity will be carried out as well as problems that may be encountered. Mount Prospect will also continue its participation in the Illinois Housing Development Authority's Mortgage Credit Certificate Program, explained earlier in this section. Mlic Hwaffig ImprcymentS I N.blic Housllng Resil"dent Ini , 1i , atives: Mount Prospect has no public housing units and thus will not have any public housing improvement programs or public housing resident initiatives. &,ductions; During the next five years, staff will continue to require all loose paint, under the Village's housing rehabilitation loan programs, be removed and either covered or repainted. We will also provide public information and education on the problem encountered with lead based paint and measures to be taken to reduce risk and protect health. W As noted in HUD's Consolidated Plan instruction manual, the purpose of this section is to present priorities for the investment of private and public funds in housing and services based on the needs identified in the Community Profile. The public funds will be received under the National Affordable Housing Act. These priorities are designed to compliment the Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect, assist residents in finding decent and affordable housing in all residential areas of the Village, address the needs of special populations in the community and carry out the purposes and meet the goals of the Act. The Village's priority analysis and development strategy calls for all resources to be available village -wide and among ail eligible residents within the Village. A priority should be made for serving low and very low income elderly and large families as well as special populations of the homeless or near homeless. Mount Prospect has identified priority needs it will address in the next year based on the data and needs documented in the Community Profile section of this document. These are: assisted senior citizen rental housing, special housing needs of the elderly, housing for first time home buyers and employees working in Mount Prospect, assisted rental housing and housing for the mentally ill and developmentally disabled. The strategy for the implementation of each follows. Srnior ,Z=_Ren tal Houi I . tb &n1g] As,5j=gg,& _5=mi. Ho,sinng M&II'latim AssiaWno� and Su'b5j�_&_,BjW,A5j*jg=: This priority was noted after a review of housing needs shown in the Three Year HAP of 1988, Five Year CHAS of 1991, CHAS public hearing testimony and reports and the 1990 Census. The Census reported a considerable increase in the elderly population over the age of 60 in Mount Prospect, from 11.38% of the population in 1980 to 17.64% in 1990 and that 675 elderly renters in 1990 had incomes below 30% of median income. Priori: To provide new construction housing for elderly low income r idents. Very low-income (0% to 50% of MFI) and low- income (51 % to 80% of MFI) - Elderly. One Year Results: Identify site for 75 units of new Section 202 or similar program units with a Section 8 Set a Side or promote other housing suitable for senior citizen use. Institutional Capacity: Village staff asked Catholic Charities to submit an application for a Section 202 subsidized senior housing development in the Village of Mount Prospect for elderly Mount 21 Prospect eligible residents in 1992. The application was approved by HUD and a Section 202 fund reservation made for the project. Catholic Charities was unable to use the fund reservation in Mount Prospect as a result of their losing their option on the selected site. Mount Prospect is still interested in supporting a Section 202 application but has not identified a satisfactory site for the development. Village C.D.B.G. funds may be used to assist in this project. Service agencies and organizations will be utilized in providing needed services to residents. If a Section 202 project is found not practical for available senior site opportunities, other funding scenarios may be utilized. Rriorityl: To address the special needs of elderly low income and very low income residents in various housing settings. Very low- income (0 % to 50 % of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80 % of MFI) - Elderly. One Year Results: 5 units of newly created shared senior housing. 5 units of rehabilitated senior homes. 3 units of Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payment. Institutional Capacity: The Resource Center for the Elderly operates a shared housing program and the recently formed Resources for Community Living personnel are operating a shared housing program for the mentally ill and disabled. Village staff will work with these agencies in promoting these housing activities. Mount Prospect's C.D.B.G. program has offered housing rehabilitation loans and subsidies for the past 13 years and will continue to offer these to very low and low income resident, including elderly homeowners. The Housing Authority of Cook County will continue to administer the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments program in the Village. If additional vouchers certificates beomieavailabie, the Village expects eligible Mount Prospect senior residents to apply for them. ..-Tim LowdAMe lHomebuyers, Assii=; As was noted in the Community Profile section, it is becoming increasing difficult for low income residents to buy and live in owner occupied housing in Mount Prospect. The Village of Mount Prospect believes that workers whose jobs are in the Village should be able to find affordable housing in Mount Prospect. PrioriV.1: To provide housing opportunities for first time low income home buyers. Examples of the housing problem can be found in the Community Profile section. Low-income (51 % to 80% of MFI) All renting households. W One Year Results: Assist 5 households in becoming first time homebuyers. Institutional Capacity: Funding would come from the Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME). In 1995, Mount Prospect will discuss with neighboring communities their interest in organizing together a first time homebuyers program and organize needed resources in the community. Funding availability is critical to achieving this priority. C.D.B.G. funds may be used to bring project homes up to Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and Village Code. Local banks have become involved in the general affordability issue and may be asked to participate. The Village has been successful in providing a Mortgage Credit Certificate activity to new first time homebuyers. This program is administered by the Illinois Housing Development Authority and offers a federal tax credit incentive. i Highmarket rate rents in Mount Prospect and the northwest suburbs often renders rental housing for very low income and low income residents unaffordable. One way to bridge the affordability gap is through the Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments Program. While the program is independently administered by the Housing Authority of Cook County, the Village of Mount Prospect must take an active role in monitoring the impact of the Section 8 Program on the community. This monitoring should take the form of (1) educating property owners and managers about the rights and obligations of landlord and tenants under the program and (2) working with the Housing Authority of Cook County to insure that over concentrations of low income households do not occur in either neighborhoods or geographic areas of the Village. Another potential source of rental assistance payments is the Federal HOME Program. Priority 4: To promote the responsible use of financial rental assistance programs throughout the Village for Mount Prospect residents. Very low-income (0% to 50% of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80% of MFI) - All renting households. One Year Results: Work closely with the Housing Authority of Cook County in the management of tenant based voucher and certificate programs for low income and very low income Mount Prospect renters. Institutional Capacity: Mount Prospect has contact with and knowledge of all rental properties in its corporate boundaries through the licensing requirements of the Landlord / Tenant Ordinance. Staff will contact rental property owner's or managers and inform them of the rules and regulations governing participation in the Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments Program. HUD C. D. B.G. funds may be used with those of private lenders and others to help rehabilitate selected rental units. W Ebuaing for It M=WhLM#, The local National Alliance for the Mentally III organization has indicated a need for group homes over the next couple of years and is pursuing several funding sources to finance these homes. Additional support may be needed to rehabilitate the selected properties for appropriate use by the occupants. Special services will need to be provided. Similar needs have been identified for the developmentally disabled. The need for this housing and associated services was discussed in the Community Profile section. Priority._.: To provide financial assistance in the purchase or rehabilitation of housing for the mentally '111 and/or the developmentally disabled. Very low-income (0 % to 50 % of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80% of MFI)-All mentally ill. One Year Results: Assist the National Alliance for the Mentally III or similar organizations upon request with the purchase and/or rehabilitation of a residential home for use as a community residence for the mentally ill or developmentally disabled.. Institutional Capacity: Mount Prospect intends to assist the National Alliance for the Mentally III or other qualified organization with the purchase and/or rehabilitation of a home in Mount Prospect to be used as a supervised community residence for the mentally ill or developmentally disabled. Funding for the project may be from Mount Prospect's C.D.B.G. funds, the State of Illinois Mental Health Department, corporate donations, HUD's Section 811 program or other appropriate sources. Priority 6: To assist qualified agencies in providing transitional housing to residents with an emphasis on providing self-sufficiency skills in a esi case management or other appropriate management style. Very low- income (0% to 50% of MFI) and low-income (51 % to 80% of MFI) - All homeless residents. One Year Results: Assist qualified agencies in applying for financing and obtaining other assistance in operating and/or opening transitional housing units in Mount Prospect. Such assistance could include a grant from the C.D.B.G. program. institutional Capacity: CERA -Northwest, WINGS and other agencies have experience in successfully operating transitional housing activities. FEMA -Emergency Shelter Grants and other funds may also be utilized by such agencies and should be supported by the Village. It should be noted that he above indicated priorities will have a positive effect in meeting housing affordability needs in Mount Prospect, and some may have a positive effect on the needs of the homeless and near homeless. RE The high cost of Mount Prospect's housing is primarily due to it's location in the Greater Chicago Area, close proximity to major highway systems and O'Hare International Airport, and the availability of the Chicago Northwestern Commuter Rail System that links Mount Prospect to the Chicago Loop. Staff has reviewed Village development requirements and believes, on a whole, they do not pose major impediments to achieving affordable housing. Even so, Mount Prospect is actively involved in finding ways to address the housing affordability issue. For example, the Village's Zoning Ordinance has been amended to permit households of up to 8 persons with developmental disabilities, and paid staff, to occupy a single dwelling unit. Staff is currently in the process of updating the Zoning and Development Ordinances and will be recommending to the Village Board approval of, among other things, a new Downtown zoning district which will permit mixed uses. Staff will pay special attention in our review of the zoning ordinance to insuring that it does not promote concentrations of low income households but does affirmatively address housing affordability as well as health and safety issue. There are no pending tax or fee increase request by the Village except for a proposed increase in Development Code fees. These have not been revised since 1984. Future request will be reviewed, in part, as to their effect on the affordability of housing in the Village. Public ffoling RuldCp1l 5 Prolm-In-wv The two senior citizen housing projects in Mount Prospect, Centennial Apartments and Huntington Towers Apartments, represent the only federally assisted housing here. Both are privately owned well managed and the Village sees no benefit to the residents in their becoming involved in their own management or their participation in a homeownership program. There are no public housing projects in Mount Prospect. 1=i1mional StruMrc: Mount Prospect will apply for and administer activities funded under a federal CDBG Entitlement Program. It will also work with adjoining communities in creating a first-time homebuyers program. Funding for the first time homebuyers program may be sought from local lending institutions, unobligated industrial bonding, and either the State of Illinois or Cook County's HOME Program. Please refer to the institutional structure narrative included in each priority noted above. They explain how each activity will be carried out as well as problems that may be encountered. mogn =,,�Malts I n WIC m sident Initiad,vo,. Mount Prospect has no public housing units and thus will not have any public housing improvement programs or public housing resident initiatives. Lcad BasedRaint Hawd, &Aiogn : During the coming year, staff will continue to require all loose paint, -under the Village's housing rehabilitation loan programs, be removed and either covered or repainted. We will also provide public information and education on the problem with lead based paint and the measures to be taken to reduce risk and protect health. W The Village's anti poverty strategy is based on an objective of the decentralization of low- income households, the provision of services and the continuation of a strong local economy. Implementation will come from the Village's belief that low and very -low income residents households should be encouraged to live and work throughout Mount Prospect. It will encourage all six priority programs noted above be distributed evenly in all neighborhoods. Each priority activity should have supportive services so participating households can climb out of poverty. These services have previously been described in this document. Finally, Mount Prosect is taking formal steps in striving to maintain and improve the economic health of the community. Last year it created an Economic Development Commission which is organizing it's strategy for promoting local economic growth. It is our belief that the provision of these previously identified housing and service programs will measurably reduce the number of households living below the poverty line by as many as 20 households. This reduction will help free up affordable housing units as these households move into market rate housing. QQdi=ion, : During the process of preparing this report, Village staff contacted by mail or phone all the organization it knew were interest in affordable housing issues and asked them to participate in the preparation of the Consolidated Plan. They were also asked to return a survey form noting what their affordable housing plans were for the coming year. The Village intends to support worthy projects identified in the surveys. Village staff also discussed with area local governments a number of affordable housing issue's and will continue to dialog and cooperate with them on such issues. 5,UM,M=111,1.QLCb= CAmments:Village staff has not received any citizen comments other than those received during the public hearing process. Accompanying this section are the minutes from those public hearings and a summary of citizen letters received during that process. Mount Prospect will perform semi-annual reviews of all Mount Prospect C.D.B.G. sub - recipients. These will include collecting data on the number of residents receiving services and a visit to their particular programs. A written report will be filed noting the results of the review. Staff will also request annual reports from the Housing Authority of Cook County on their progress in providing Section 8 and other assistance in Mount Prospect. Staff may assist the PHA in encouraging Mount Prospect residents in applying for the Section 8 progrwn. A report from the Village will also be prepared on the progress of it's Section 202, HOME or other National Affordable Housing Act activities. M U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Homeless Populations and Subpopulations Total # TOTAL NUMBER SERVED BY Total # Homeless Reception/Day Emergency Transitional Homeless Unsheltered Centers Shelters Housing Part 1: Homeless Population (a + c + d) (a) (b) W (d) Families with Children 1. Number of Homeless Families 0 0 0 0 0 2. Number of Persons In Homeless Families 5 0 0 5 0 Individuals not In Families 3. Youth (17 years of age or younger) 0 0 0 0 0 4. Adults (18+ years of age) 18 10 0 8 0 TOTAL (lines 2 + 3 + 4) 23 10 0 13 0 Part 2: Subp2pulations Part 2: Continued % of % of Homeless Persons with Special Needs Related to: Total r 6. Other (Specify) Total 1. Severe Mental Illness {SMI} Only 8.7 2 Homeless Youth 31.0 2. Alcohol/Other Drug Abuse Only 60.9 14 3. SMI and Alcohol/Other Drug Abuse 0.0 0 4. Domestic Violence 0.0 0 5. AIDS/Related Diseases 0.0 0 01/20/95 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 10:25:01 CPD Consolidated Plan System Listing of Priority Needs HOMELESS NEEDS Outreach Assessment Emergency Shelters Transitional Shelters Permanent Supportive Housing Permanent Housing FAM INDIV WSPECIAL NEEDS M M H L L M H M M H H M H H H 1 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Priority Need Level H = High M - Medium Est. Est. Dollars Needed Priority Need L = Low N= No Such Need Units To Address HOUSING NEEDS 0-30% 31-.W% 51-80% Renter/Sm Family/Cost Burden > 30% H H L 564 500,000 Renter/Sm Family/Cost Burden > 50% H H M 225 200,000 Renter/Sm Family/Physical Defects H M M 666 600,000 Renter/Sm Family/Overcrowded M M L 290 290,000 Renter/Lg Family/Cost Burden > 30% H H M 114 100,000 Renter/Lg Family/Cost Burden > 50% H H M 42 40,000 Renter/Lg Family/Physical Defects M M M 216 200,000 Renter/Lg Family/Overcrowded M M L 219 220,000 Renter/Elderly/Cost Burden > 30% M M L 505 500,000 Renter/Eideriy/Cost Burden > 50% H H M 202 200,000 Renter/Elderly/Physical Defects H M L 505 500,000 Renter/Eideriy/Overcrowded L L L 10 10,000 Owner/Cost Burden > 30% H M L 1,202 1,200,000 Owner/Cost Burden > 50% H H M 442 400,000 Owner/Physical Defects H H M 1,038 1,300,000 Owner/Overcrowded M M L 132 130,000 HOMELESS NEEDS Outreach Assessment Emergency Shelters Transitional Shelters Permanent Supportive Housing Permanent Housing FAM INDIV WSPECIAL NEEDS M M H L L M H M M H H M H H H 1 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 01/2*0195 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 10:25:03 CPD Consolidated Plan System Listing of Priority Needs K Priority Need Level Est. Dollars H High M = Medium Est. Needed Priority Need L = Low N - No Such Need Units To Address PUBLIC FACILITY NEEDS PRIORITY NEED LEVEL Senior Centers N 0 Youth Centers M 500,000 Neighborhood Facilities M 500,000 Child Care Centers N 0 Parks, Recreational Facilities H 500,000 Health Facilities M 500,000 Parking Facilities M 1,000,000 Other Public Facilities N 0 INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS Solid Waste Disposal Improvements N 0 Flood Drain Improvements L 100,000 Water Improvements L 100,000 Street Improvements M 100,000 Sidewalks Improvements L 50,000 Sewer Improvements M 100,000 Asbestos Removal L 500,000 Other Infrastructure Improvements Needs L 100,000 PUBLIC SERVICE NEEDS Senior Services L 50,000 Handicapped Services H 50,000 Youth Services M 50,000 Transportation Services L 100,000 Substance Abuse Services L 100,000 Employment Training M 100,000 Crime Awareness M 100,000 K 01/20/95 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 10:25:04 CPD Consolidated Plan System Listing of Priority Needs Total Estimated Dollars Needed To Address: 13,8209000 3 Priority Need Level H = High M 4" Medium Est. Est. Dollars Needed Priority Need L = Low N - No Such Need Units To Address Fair Housing Activities L 100,000 Tenant/Landlord Counseling L 100,000 Child Care Services L 100,000 Health Services H 80,000 Other Public Service Needs N 0 ACCESSIBILITY NEEDS Accessibility Needs M 100,000 HISTORIC PRESERVATION NEEDS Residential Historic Preservation Needs L 100,000 Non -Residential Historic Preservation Needs L 100,000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEEDS Commercial -Industrial Rehabilitation M 100,000 Commercial- Industrial Infrastructure L 500,000 Other Commercial Industrial Improvements L 100,000 Micro - Businesses L 100,000 Other - Businesses L 100,000 Technical Assistance L 100,000 Other Economic Development Needs L 100,000 OTHER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Energy Efficiency Improvements H 100,000 Lead -Based Paint/Hazards L 100,000 Code Enforcement M 300,000 PLANNING Planning L 50,000 Total Estimated Dollars Needed To Address: 13,8209000 3 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CPD Consolidated Plan Support of Applications by Other Entlitles Report Support Application Fundin&,Source batifli%'.) TQ(her E A. Formula/Entitlement Programs ESG Y Public Housing Comprehensive Grant N B. Competitive Programs HOPE 1 N HOPE 2 N HOPE 3 Y ESG Y Supportive Housing Y HOPWA Y Safe Havens N Rural Homeless Housing N Sec. 202 Elderly Y Sec. 811 Handicapped Y Moderate Rehab SRO N Rental Vouchers Y Rental Certificates Y Public Housing Development N Public Housing MROP N Public Housing CIAP N LIHTC Y SF -424 APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE Program: CDBG 1. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: Application: C Preapplication: 2. DATE SUBMITTED: 04/09/95 Applicant Identifier: B -95 -MC -17-0027 3. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE: State Identifier: 4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY: Federal Identifier: S. APPLICANT INFORMATION: Village of Mount Prospect, Illiniois Legal Name: Planning Department Organizational Unit: 100 South Emerson Street Address: Mount Prospect, IL 60056 County: Cook Contact person: Michael Sims Telephone Number: (708) 818-5313 6. EMPLOYER ID NUMBER: 36-6006011 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: C 8. TYPE OF APPLICATION: C N revision: 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development 10. CATALOG OF DOMESTIC FEDERAL ASSISTANCE NUMBER:14-21 Title: Community Development Block Grant -Entitlement 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT: 1995 Community Development Block Grant "CDBG" Entitlement Grant 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT: Village of Mount Prospect 13. PROPOSED PROJECT Start Date: 05/01/95 End Date: 12/31/95 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS: Applicant: 6, 8, 10 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING: Project: 6,8,10 Federal: 393000 Applicant: 0 State: 0 Local: 0 Other. 0 Program Income: 17493 TOTAL: 410493 16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS? C 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? N 18. THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT: Authorized Representative: Michael E. Janonis Me: Village Manager Telephone number: (708) 392-6000 Date Signed: 04/09/95 Run Date: 61120195 R U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Page: Run Time: 10:47:16 CPD Consolidated Plan System Listing of Proposed Projects Project ID I Local Code Project Title and Description Activity Code/Title/Citation Funding Sources Proposed Accomplishments Boxwood Advocacy/Neighborhood Services 05 CDBG $ 13,800 150 Youth Program Youth Services 1570.201 (e) HOME $ 0 1.2 The agency provides an after school ESG $ 0 leaming and recreational activty during the HOPWA $ 0 school year and a five week similiar program SUBTOTAL: 139800 during the summer at Euclid School PHA Funding $ 0 primarily for low and moderate -income Assisted Hs $ 0 young people in the Boxwood community. TOTAL: $ 139800 Helps prevent homelessness? No Prior Year Money? No Helps the homeless? No Helps those with HIV or AIDS? No CDBG National Objective Citation: 570.208(a)(2) - LOW(MOD LIMITED CLIENTELE BENEFIT Subreciplent: Non -Section 204 Location: CT & BG Cook County: ; CT 8027.01, BG 3 2 Access to Care Program 05 CDBG $ 11,000 467 People (General) Health Services 1570.201 (e) HOME $ 0 1.3 Provides to low and moderate -income ESG $ 0 residents physican care, prescription drugs, HOPWA $ 0 lab tests and x-ray services to those not SUBTOTAL:$ 119000 eligible for other publicly assisted health PHA Funding $ 0 care and those without private health Assisted Hsg $ 0 insurance. TOTAL: $ 11,000 Helps prevent homelessness? Helps the homeless? Helps those with HIV or AIDS? CDBG National Objective Citation: Subreciplent: Non -Section 204 Location: CITY WIDE No No No 570.208(a)(2) - LOWIMOD LIMITED CLIENTELE BENEFIT Prior Year Money? No Run T01/20/95 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CDBG $ Page: 2 Run ime: 10:47:17 CPD Consolidated Plan System 0 1.5 The program will create three pre -teen and ESG $ 0 Listing of Proposed Projects HOPWA $ 0 Project ID I SUBTOTAL:$ 51700 personal goals and provide personal Proposed Local Code Project Title and Description Activity CodeffitlelCitation Funding Sources Assisted Hsg $ $ Accomplishments 11 Senior Services - Senior Shared Housing 05A CDBG $ 1,400 8 Elderly Prior Year Money? No Senior Services 1570.201(e) HOME $ 0 1.4 Provides low-income senior home owners ESG $ 0 570.208(a)(2) - LOWIMOD LIMITED with an additional income by renting to the HOPWA $ 0 low-income at aftrable rates. Program SUBTOTAL:$ 19400 provides counseling and on-going support. PHA Funding $ 0 Assisted Hsg $ 0 Helps prevent homelessness? Yes TOTAL: $ 1.400 Helps the homeless? Yes Helps those with HIV or AIDS? No Prior Year Money? No CDBG National Objective Citation: 570.208(a)(2) - LOWIMOD LIMITED CLIENTELE BENEFIT Subreciplent: Non -Section 204 Location: CITY WIDE 4 New Horizons / Neighborhood Services 05 CDBG $ 5,700 120 Youth Program Youth Services 1570.201 (e) HOME $ 0 1.5 The program will create three pre -teen and ESG $ 0 teenage groups, meeting twice a week, to HOPWA $ 0 improve the child's self reliance, establishing SUBTOTAL:$ 51700 personal goals and provide personal PHA Funding $ 0 opportunities fbr the child to participate in Assisted Hsg $ $ 0 5g700 neighborhood activities. TOTAL: Helps prevent homelessness? No Prior Year Money? No Helps the homeless? No Helps those with HIV or AIDS? No CDBG National Objective Citation: 570.208(a)(2) - LOWIMOD LIMITED CLIENTELE BENEFIT Subreciplent: Non -Section 204 Location: CT & BG Cook County: ; CT 8050.02, BG 5 Run Dote: Run Time: 01/20/95, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 600 0 People (General) Page: 3 Handicapped Services 1570.201 {e) HOME $ 10:47:18 CPD Consolidated Plan System ESG $ 0 and Individualized support services for HOPWA $ 0 Listing of Proposed Projects SUBTOTAL: $ 600 disabilities with a shared housing approach Project ID I 0 with able bodied home owners or assist in Assisted Hsg $ 0 finding affordable rental units. LocalCodeProject Title and Description Activity CodelTitle/Citation Funding Sources Proposed Accomplishments 8 Transitional Living Program 05 CDBG $ 6,000 34 People (General) Public Services (General) HOME $ 0 1.6 This new program provides transitional 570.201 (e) ESG $ 0 housing and supportive services, including HOPWA $ 0 the development of self-sufficiency skills, to SUBTOTAL:$ 6,000 homeless residents, all in a case PHA Funding $ 0 management approach. Assisted Hsg $ 0 TOTAL: $ 6,000 Helps prevent homelessness? Helps the homeless? Helps those with HIV or AIDS? CDBG National Objective Citation: Subrociplent: Non -Section 204 Location: CITY WIDE Yes Yes No 570.208(a)(2) - LOW/MOD LIMITED CLIENTELE BENEFIT Prior Year Money? No 12 Resources for Community Living 05B CDBG $ 600 0 People (General) Handicapped Services 1570.201 {e) HOME $ 0 1.7 The agency will provide affordable housing ESG $ 0 and Individualized support services for HOPWA $ 0 adults with developmental and physical SUBTOTAL: $ 600 disabilities with a shared housing approach PHA Funding $ 0 with able bodied home owners or assist in Assisted Hsg $ 0 finding affordable rental units. TOTAL: $ 600 Helps prevent homelessness? Helps the homeless? Helps those with HIV or AIDS? CDBG National Objective Citation: Subreciplent: Non -Section 204 Location: CITY WIDE Yes Yes No 570.208(a)(2) - LOWIMOD LIMITED CLIENTELE BENEFIT Prior Year Money? Yes Run Data: 01/20/95 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Page: 4 Run Time: 10:47:19 CPD Consolidated Plan System Listing of Proposed Projects Project ID I Proposed Local Code Project Title and Description Activity Codeffitle/Citation Funding Sources Accomplishments 7 Single Family Housing Rehabilitation/Home 14A CDBG $ 274,993 15 Housing Units Weatherization Rehab; Single -Unit Residential 1 HOME $ 0 2.1 0% interest housing rehabilitation loan for 570.202 ESG $ 0 low -moderate income homeowners to HOPWA $ 0 correct code violations and weatherize, SUBTOTAL: $ 2740993 PHA Funding $ 0 50% subsidy payments for energy Assisted Hsg $ TOTAL: $ 0 274,993 conservation improvements on homes owned and occupied by low -moderate Prior Year Money? Yes income homeowners. Flood grants made in prior years for low-modertate income homeowners. Helps prevent homelessness? Yes Helps the homeless? No Helps those with HIV or AIDS? No CDBG National Objective Citation: 570.208(a)(3) - LOWIMOD HOUSING BENEFIT Subreciplent: None Location: CITY WIDE Run Date: Run Time: 61/20/95- U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development CDBG $ Page: 5 10:47:19 CPD Consolidated Plan System 0 7.1 Program administration and planning 570.206 ESG $ 0 Listing of Proposed Projects HOPWA $ 0 Project ID I No SUBTOTAL: $ 47,000 Helps the homeless? No Local Code Project Title and Description Activity Code/Title/Cltation Funding Sources Assisted Hsg $ Proposed Accomplishments 10 Handicap Ramps Improvements 10 CDBG $ 50,000 500 Public Facilities Prior Year Money? No Removal of Architectural Barriers 1 HOME $ 0 4.3 The Installation of handicap ramps at 570.201 (k) ESG $ 0 int6rsections and other appropriate locations HOPWA $ 0 within public road right-of-ways. SUBTOTAL:$ 50,000 Helps prevent homelessness? No PHA Funding $ Assisted Hsg $ 0 0 Helps the homeless? No TOTAL: $ 50,000 Helps those with HIV or AIDS? N© CDBG National Objective Citation: 570.208(a)(2) - LOWIMOD LIMITED Prior Year Money? No CLIENTELE BENEFIT Subreciplent: None Location: CITY WIDE 9 Program Administration 21A CDBG $ 47,000 0 General Program Administration l HOME $ 0 7.1 Program administration and planning 570.206 ESG $ 0 HOPWA $ 0 Helps prevent homelessness? No SUBTOTAL: $ 47,000 Helps the homeless? No PHA Funding $ 0 Helps those with HIV or AIDS? No Assisted Hsg $ 0 CDBG National Objective Citation: TOTAL: $ 47,000 Subrociplent: None Prior Year Money? No Location: N/A 40 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND CONSOLIDATED PLAN CITMN PARnCIPATION PLAN The goal of the citizen participation plan is to encourage citizens to participate in an advisory role in planning, implementing and evaluating Mount Prospects Community Development Block Grant (C.D.B.G.) Program and Consolidated Plan. Activities to be uhidertaken are as follows: I. Provide for and encourage citizen participation with particular emphasis on participation by persons of lower and moderate income who are residents of slum and blight areas as defined by the Village of Mount Prospect, and encourage participation of residents of public and assisted housing developments. 2. Provide citizens with information regarding local meetings, pertinent data and records relating to the Village of Mount Prospect's proposed use of funds and the actual use of funds. 3. Provide tecbr" assistance to groups , epi esadative of persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance in developing proposals. 4. Provide public hearings to obtain citizen's views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the Community Development Block Grant Program, including at least the development of needs, the review of proposed activities and review of program performance. These hearings will be held after a ten day notice of hearing has been published in the local newspaper. The hearing notice will indicate the time, location and purpose of the hearing. Public hearings will also be held during the Consolidated Plan process. Thew hearings will include at least one for the development of needs, one for review of the plan and one for reviewing performance. 5. Special arrangements will be nude to make irdbrmatim available to handicapped persons and non-English speaking individuals. Special arrangiyme t will also be made to assist such individuals in attending and participating in Community Development Block Grant and Consolidated Plan public hearings. 6. Provide within 15 working, days a response to all written complaints and grievances regarding the Community Development Block Grant Program and Comprehensive Plan. 7. Publish a summary of the proposed consolidated plan and make available copies of the plan at the Mount Prospect Public Library, Mount Prospect Senior Center and Mount Prospect Village Hall. S. Pmvide it least 30 days from the date of publishing the summary of the Consolidated Plan to receive comments on the plan, amexadmesrts or report that is to be submitted to HUD. 9. Provide citizens with access to Consolidated Plan and Ctamiunity Development Block Cmt records between the hours of 8:30 Lin. and 5:00 p.in., Monday through Friday. These records am available in the Phating Office of the Vfte Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. 10. Non-FiMaish speaking speakers and residents attending a consofidated plan or Community Development Block Grant hearing will receive assist&= in participating in those hearings. Wster/sevow supw*terwert Herbert L Weeks iMA,INTAIN Seen P. Dorsey Deputy mwtor 9b VsUming suwir*+�11d�rlt Gen R. Anther MieMynL. Both Adn*gswat" AW* Down L Wucki 64" waste coomfew"r V@NcW/E*ipn,*nt Super*%endera M. Lisa Angel Jwr*s E, Guenow Village Engir~ je" & WLS backer Mount Prospect Public Works 'Department 1700 W. Central Road. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Phone 70E3/870-5640 Fax 70E3/253-9377 TDO 700/392-1235 MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION I. CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, January 16, 1995. 11. ROLL CALL Upon roll call, each Safety Member introduced themselves to the audience. Present upon roll call: Lee Beening Chairman Andy Mitchell Commissioner Joan Bjork Commissioner Arlene Juracek Commissioner Del Ulreich Fire Department Tom Daley Police Department Me[ Both Pubic Works Sean Won Pubic Works, Engineering Division Absent: Art Coy Commissioner Chris Lenz Commissioner Others in Attendance-*, See Attached List Ill. APPRQVAL O,FM!Njj Commissioner Arlene Juracek, seconded by Tom Daley, moved to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Safety Commission held on December 12, 1994. %eyded ftW -4 IV. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD No citizen came forth at this time to discuss any topici that were not on the current agenda. V. BUSINESS A) PARKING RE,STRlgTIQ,N.ON 100 BLOQK, OE,§O..UTH AUO,Ra.LANE Mr. Dan Ewing of 12 Audrey Lane said that the cam belonging to workers from the dental office on Central Road are no longer parking on Audrey Lane and wants to withdraw the request. Tom Daley mentioned that the Police Department discussed the Issue with the dental office workers who are parking on Audrey Lane. The dental office workers understood the safety concerns due to the parked cam on Audrey Lane. The Police Department resolved the issue. Mr. Dan Ewing withdrew his request and commented that he appreciated the Police Department's effort. Mr. Dan Ewing asked about the time frame of monitoring traffic on Audrey Lane after the recent closure of Connie Lane (January 12, 1995). Sean Won said a few weeks after the closure. Chairman Lee Beening mentioned that previously the time frame was about 30 days after the closure. The new traffic count will be performed in February after the motorists got used to the Connie Lane closure. i 11WRIS d[--*4:ffCiLTA1jk AVIN Mr. John Fox of 516 See-Gwun Avenue discussed his concerns about the traffic volume and speed on See-Gwun Avenue. He noticed that even the school buses exceeded the speed limit. He mentioned that he had contacted the Police to patrol regularly (once a week about 15 minutes). The Police Department said that they can only patrol occasionally. Sean Won discussed the study done by Civiltech Engineering, Inc. The study concluded that the stop signs are not warranted even though there Is a speeding problem on See-Gwun Avenue. The 85th percentile speed Is 32 mph which Is 7 mph over the posted speed limit (26 mph). The study recommended a periodic police enforcement because stop signs are not effective means of controlling vehicle speeds. Mr. Gone Starch of See-Gwun Avenue also discussed his concerns about the traffic volume and speed. He questioned why the speed i'rrfd of Lonquist Boulevard is 20 mph. Tom Daley said that 20 mph Is reserved for the school district area. Commissioner Arlene Juracek mentioned that there used to be a school in Sunset Park. Commissioner Jurseek said Se*Gwun Avenue Is the only thru stoat crossing the Weller Creek between Busse Road and Route 83 and, therefore, collects more traffic than typical local street even though the traffic count does not meet the warrants. Mm. Kathy Fox noted that the study did not consider the seasonal traffic reduction (the traffic M count was done in December before the golf season) and a steep downgrade for northbound traffic. Mrs. Fox mentioned that the drivers may speed due to a steep downgrade without recognizing it. Commissioner Juracek recommended to take additional traffic counts during the golf season. Tom Daley mentioned that only small percentage of the motorists are eligible for speeding ticket (10 mph over the posted speed limit). Tom Daley said that the Police will patrol the area during the different time of the day to identify the problem and will do it again in April/May (during the golf season) to check for any traffic increase. He recommended that this issue be reconsidered after the new traffic count and spot speed study are done during the golf season. Mr. Gene Starch questioned if speed limit signs are sufficient on SeeGwun Avenue. Chairman Lee Beening said that the Engineering Staff will investigate whether the speed limit signs are sufficient and property installed. Tom Daley requested the residents contact the Police if they have problems during any particular time. The Police Department will adjust their patrols accordingly. Mr. Dan Ewing mentioned that one traffic count may not be a representative sample for some cases. Sean Won said he will contact the residents before the traffic counts to gather better representative samples. Commissioner Arlene Juracek seconded by Mel Both, moved for periodic police speed enforcement on SeeGwun Avenue and reconsidering the stop sign request after additional traffic counts and spot speed study are performed during the golf season. The Safety Commission voted 7-0 to approve this motion. Sean Won discussed the results of the parking restriction survey. He said Charlie Club had joggers' complaints about truck parking and they approved the parking restriction on Midway Drive. Zanies did not respond to the survey. The Engineering Staff recommended the parking restriction on Midway Drive because two (Charlie Club and Park National Bank) out of 3 businesses approved it Chairman Lee Beening and Commissioners Arlene Juracek, Andy Mitchell and Joan Bjork discussed the truck parking. Tom Daley said that there are no overnight truck parking problems on Midway Drive. Tom Daley, seconded by Commissioner Arlene Juracek moved thatrt rid 'siq Pa ng ns on the south side of MkWay Ddve be inOtalled. He noted that if businesses need additional parking they can contact the Police to obtain parking perrift during a specific time frame. The Safety Cornrnission voted 7-0 to approve the motion. D) 9H DREN,-AT�P,L6Y:.$I�GNIIIIIIIIIIIIIR,,g,QW, g�T LM!±UR 8�ST AygNug, OB--Q-Q,NK ROA.Da, NORTH,QE.I4S1N2LQt! RQAQ Sean Won said that Ms. Judith Resele of 400 Larkdale Lane had contacted him about the Children -At -Play sign request. He explained the potential danger of unwarranted and unenforceable signs. He said this Children -At -Play sign could give a false sense of security to residents and children. Ms. Resele understood the explanation and withdrew the request. Chairman Lee Beening mentioned that the resident (Mr. Jagus) was not informed about the Safety Commission Agenda in December, 1994. Therefore, this issue Is discussed again. Sean Won said that Mr. Jagus was informed this time before the Safety Commission Meeting. Mr. Jagus did not attend the meeting. Tom Daley, seconded by Commissioner Joan Bjork moved to take no action on the parking restriction request on 1400 block of East Henry Street Mr. Daley noted that Mr. Jagus can contact the Village again If he wants to pursue a parking restriction. The Safety Commission voted 7-0 to approve the motion. Sean Won discussed the stop sign request at Eric Avenue and Cardinal Lane. The stop sign study was done by Civiftech Engineering, Inc. The study showed that the stop sign is not warranted. The study did identify a possible conflict created by confusion of drivers over who has the right of way at this "r intersection. To mitigate this confusion, the study did recommend a yield sign on Cardinal Lane at Eric Avenue. Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Tom Daley motioned to *Install a yield sign on Cardinal Lane at Eric Avenue. The Safety Commission voted 7-0 to approve this V1. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 7-0 to adjournment at 8:17 P.M., January 16, 1995, upon the motion of Tom Daley. Commissioner Arlene Juracek seconded the motion. Respectfully submitted, Sean S.M. Won, P.E. Traffic Engineer ,�.-.,. �� � !� . � ,w � BE C.0 pct MOUNT PROSPECT CORP. LWTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT STREET AND ADDRESS MAP ELK GROVE TOWNSHIP E.1/2 S.E.1/4 Sec.23-41-11 DATE. JULY 92 1,DRAWN BY: WK SCALE: 1- REV1SON- NO, I I'l APPA04D BY.. GA FILE: 47-S D z o I T307 305 3044 a 303 302 U a 301 300 209 218 Lo 306 N r 304 0 0 It c0 00 a 302 NN CN CARDINAL. LN ,i 1b I i Co o co 00 N d` Q 0 'd, 00 0 o 0 N po 'd" CC to c — — LC) o Lo % N , 000000 0 ---------------------- MT PROSPECT PLAZA MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA t tI SHOPPING CENTER i *� Qi i t 64 t w 134 i tt 1141 1143 i i i �► z E CENTRAL RD OUNT CT Q u ) i c0RP. � 0 MAINE TOWNSHIP W,1 2 N,W.1 "4 Sec.07-41-12 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT STREET AND ADDRESS MAP 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET WHEELING TOWNSHIP MOUNT PROSPECT, IU.INOIS E.1/2 S.W.1 f4 Sec.35--42-11 it PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE00' RCVSOft NO,. , 1 A ', a PILE; to -N, DWO r � i # i i r i 4 ,i 1b I i Co o co 00 N d` Q 0 'd, 00 0 o 0 N po 'd" CC to c — — LC) o Lo % N , 000000 0 ---------------------- MT PROSPECT PLAZA MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA t tI SHOPPING CENTER i *� Qi i t 64 t w 134 i tt 1141 1143 Q t 0 a i Q 20 z E CENTRAL RD OUNT CT Q u ) i c0RP. � 0 MAINE TOWNSHIP W,1 2 N,W.1 "4 Sec.07-41-12 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT STREET AND ADDRESS MAP 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET WHEELING TOWNSHIP MOUNT PROSPECT, IU.INOIS E.1/2 S.W.1 f4 Sec.35--42-11 PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE00' RCVSOft NO,. , 1 A ', a PILE; to -N, DWO VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, DIR OR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DAT- E JANUARY 31, 1995 SUBJECT: ZBA-1-A-95, ZBA-2-Z-95, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for zoning text and map amendments prepared by staff. The requests were reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their regular meeting of January 26, 1995. At the meeting, Planner Ray Forsythe, discussed the requests. Attached to this memorandum are a map indicating the proposed map amendments and a summary of the proposed text changes. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the map amendments and indicated their general support. After a discussion with a nearby property owner, the members recommended that the property commonly known as Village Commons should be removed from the proposed B-5 District and remain R-3. Specific comments by residents and Zoning Board of Appeals members are indicated in the minutes. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the map amendments as indicated on the attached map with the exception of the Village Commons property. The Zoning Board of Appeals then discussed the proposed text amendments and indicated their support. There was a discussion on the separation between primary and accessory structures and requiring fire -rated materials. Staff has further researched the subject and has modified the proposed text on the attached memorandum. By a vote of 5-1, the Zoning Board recommends approval of the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as indicated on the attached memorandum. Please forward the attached to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their February 7th meeting. WJC:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GEL BASNIX, CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNE DATE: JANUARY 18,1 995 SUBJECT: ZBA-1-A-95, ZBA-2-Z-959 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT B-5 DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICT The Village is seeking map amendments in order to rezone the subject properties from: P-1, B-2.1, B-3) B-2. R-31, R-11 R-41 1-11 1-2 and B-4 Districts to B-5 Central Commercial and B -5C Central Commercial Core District. The B-5 and B -5C District was created in an effort to reflect property characteristics that currently exist in the downtown area. The majority of the properties in the downtown do not meet the bulk regulations and parking requirements of the underlying zoning classifications. 04,,the Village Bo o the Zoning Ordinance which In October of 19 g, a revision t included the creation of the B-5 B 5 ist icts. At that time a number of properties were 0 Dist However the Village did not af, proposed to be rezoned to the newly cfeated B-5 an 5'C"' ... . .. . ...... fl;14,'�"'-W: meet the legal notice requirements of the Zoning Code and71ere"�" ore these properties were never officially rezoned. Staff became;aware of the fact that these properties were not properly rezoned In October of 1994 after an inquiry regarding the zoning of a property in this district. In an effort to garner sufficient input from property owners in the proposed downtown district, staff has held two public meetings. Staff met on October 20th and November 10th to explain the proposal and to receive the input from these property owners. The attached B-5 zoning text has been modified to reflect comments received at these meetings. These modifications include the following: 1. The list of allowable conditional uses has been expanded to include animal hospitals, automobile garages and drive-through/drive-in establishments. 2. The minimum building setbacks have been modified to require a setback in areas where a front yard setback has been previously established. This section was added in response to concerns along West Prospect Avenue. Currently, several of these offices are set back 30 feet from the property line. It was agreed that it would be inappropriate to allow one of the lots within this area to be built to the front property line when all other properties are set back 30 feet. Crit UU Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 3. Staff has modified the transitional setback section to reflect existing conditions along Prospect Avenue and Northwest Highway. The current B-5 District requires a transitional setback equal to the height of the building if adjacent to residential zoning districts. Several commercial properties along Northwest Highway and Prospect Avenue have parking areas that are built out to the rear property lines. Staff has revised the text to permit parking within the required rear yard setback if adjacent to a dedicated public alleyway. This modification would eliminate several non -conforming situations that exist throughout the downtown area. 4. i n 4 4CgntrW Area, Parkin gRe2ulafligns As a result of the meetings held and the changes to the B-5 text, the following parking standards are proposed to be added: Drive-in/Drive-up Facility Four (4) stacking spaces for each window plus those spaces required for the principal use. Library Two (2) spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. The above listed modifications to the B-5 zoning text will eliminate many non -conforming situations in the downtown area. The majority of the business owners that attended both meetings expressed their satisfaction with the proposed rezoning, assuming the above listed modifications are applied. However, owners and operators of automobile uses in the proposed district expressed their concern with the need for a conditional use permit. The majority of these uses are currently zoned B-4 and are permitted uses within that district. It should be noted that these uses would all be allowed to operate as they exist today, and would only need to apply for a conditional use permits if they made substantial modifications to their site. Staff feels that these uses are not conducive in the downtown area therefore would recommend that we maintain these uses as conditional uses. Please review the attached materials for the January 26th public hearing. Staff will be present to answer any questions regarding this matter. RPF:hg 10MB-5 Central Commei 3 ... B -SC Central Comm 11 -8-94 Planm'ng artmei Den ,- w0Et1L�1G DA r �� VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF "PEALS GEL BASNEK9 CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY FORSYTHE9 PLANNER'�*j DATE: JANUARY 13, 1995 SUBJECT: ZBA-1-A-95, ZBA-2-Z-95, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS Outlined beloware proposed zoni1119 text amendments that have been drafted in response to the issues raised since the lastZo'9 Code amendment, = d#IG"'nal lumn Currently the Zoning Ordinance limits nursing homes to the R-5 Senior Citizen Residence District only. Because there is, currently a 1*1' ted area,of R-5 propertylin Mount Prospect rw and there are R4 Distnicts, which are located in areas well suited for this type of use, staff feels it is appropriate to add this as a conditional use in the R-4 District. This would allow existing complexes or buildings to be converted to convalescent homes/nursing homes as well as new structures constructed with a conditional use permit. 0 to's 4. Convalescent Home - Nursing Home 2. -R=, laflop:j fQr 5,=*,r ructum and., Usesl'111111.1.11��'(Ga D mpgjag, R cHng&AnQ Currently the Zoning Ordinance provides for the screening of garbage dumpsters and recycling containers, however, it does not give specific guidelines for design and location. The proposed amendment gives the Solid Waste Coordinator review and approval of both exterior and interior dumpster areas. I. Garbage Dumpsters and Recycling Containers. Designated garbage dumpsters and recycling container locations shall maintain the same setbacks as parking lots. Such Zoning Board of Appeals January 13, 1995 Page 2 locations shall be screened on all sides by a solid wood fence or equivalent screening material to a height not less than six (6) feet. g�e, WQEd" I 1. Garbage Dumpsters and Recycling Containers. a. Required. All multi -family buildings uti'd-"V%&V &a centralized solid waste services shall provide a garbage dumpster and recycling container area which meets the minimum standards which have been established by the Solid Waste Coordinator. b. Location. Outdoor designated garbage dumpsters and recycling containers shall maintain the same setbacks as parking lots. Dumpsters and 'containers that are located within covered parking areas shall be designed so that they do not conflict with required parking spaces or access drives. C. Screening. Such dumpsters and containers shall be screened on MI sides by a solid wood fence or equivalent screening material to a height not less than six (6) feet. 3. 14,15041D 14.11804. I nJL1 Setbacks Dt, 14*Z004.1). 142104DTransiflo The Zoning Ordinance requires commercial properties to provide an 8 foot landscaped and fenced buffer from adjacent residential districts. Staff feels that this is excessive and unwarranted. Staff would recommend that this requirement be eliminated and rely on the existing standards of the landscape ordinance which require a six foot fence and landscaping across 75% of the property when a parking lot is installed abutting a residential area. Staff that this is adequate and will pose less of a hardship on commercial property owners. Qa:= WordID9. D. Transitional Setbacks. Where a side or rear lot line in a B-1, B-21, B-3, B-43, O/R and I-1 District abuts any residential zoning district, all buildings, structures and parking lots shall be set back twenty five feet (25') from the abutting lot line. Such setback shall include a six foot (6) fence along the entire length of the transitional setback. The fence shall be located not less than eight feet (8) from the property line. In addition to the fence, a continuous evergreen or dense deciduous hedge three feet (3') in height, two and one-half (2 1/2') on center, shall be planted on the outside of the fence, facing the abutting residential zoning district, along the entire length of the fence. This transitional landscape area shall be maintained and kept free of weeds. D. Transitional Setbacks. Where a side or rear lot line in a B-1. B -2s B-31 B41, O -R and 1-1 District abuts any residential zoning district, all buildings structures and parking lots shall Zoning Board of App anuary 13,, 1995 Page 3 1 meet the required yard setback. Such setback shall be landscaped as required in Section 14.2306 and 14.2308 of the Landscape Requirements. 4. In order to clarify and uniform the language in the Development Code and the Zoning Ordinance regarding driveways, staffwould recommend the following be added: Construction. Driveways and driveway approaches shall be paved With concrete, bituminous concrete or paver bricks in accordance with the construction standards set forth in the Development Code. 5. 14.30,6.A.,4, Access =.,Strut j!reE The separation between the principal structure and an accessory structure is required to be ten (10) feet however, an exception is given for detached garages which allows up to a three (3) foot separation if the garage is fire rated. Staff would recommend that this be expanded to include all accessory structures. This will permit conforming sheds to be located within dm (3) feet of a residence if all required setbacks are met. This will allow townhouse and commercial areas with limited lot sizes to construct storage areas. Overt W0jrd' pz. "4. Separation Between Buildings. A detached accessory building or structure shall be located no closer to the principal building than ten (10) feet, except where a detached garage is constructed with fire -rated drywall to meet the requirements of the Mount Prospect Building Code, However, the minimum separation permitted is three (3) feet. Decks attached to the principal building are permitted to attach to a swimming pool if all required rear and side yard setbacks are met and the deck is designed with a gate between the deck and pool and access is provided to the yard from the deck." 4. Separation Between Buildings. A detached accessory building or structure shall be located no closer to the principal building than three (3) feet. Detached garages located between three (3) and ten (10) feet from a principal building shall be provided with a five eighths (5/8) inch drywall finish on the interior walls and ceiling. Decks attached to the principal building are permitted to attach to a swimming pool if all required rear and sideyard setbacks are met, the deck is designed with a gate between the deck and pool, and access is provided to the yard from the deck. MINES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA- I -A-95 and Hearing Date. January 26, 1995 ZBA-2-Z-95 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect SUBJECT PROPERTY." See body of text PUBLICATION DATE, January 11, 1995 (Journal) REQUEST: The Village is seeping amendments a permitted in Section 14.203.D. * Seebody of text for specifics. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon ElizabethLuxem Jack Verha Belt AB SETT ,Robert Brettrager OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES.- See body of text Chairman Basnik introduced case ZBA-1-A-95 and ZBA-2-Z-95'being a request for amendments as permitted in Section 14.203.I3. The amendments include text amendments to the, following Sections; 1.4.9041; 14.05.8.; 14..905.F. 7 Articles XRT -T-5 Central Commercial District 141303 Conditions Uses -:R4 Multi Family District 1.4.5O4.1) Transitional Setbacks -B-1 Business Office 14.1604.1) Transitional Setback -B-2 Neighborhood Shopping District 14.7O4D Transitional Setbacks -B-3 Comms Shopping District 4.104.E Transitional Setbacks -B-4 Business Retail & Serv. Dist. 14.2004.1) Transitional Setbacks - l► -R Office Research District 14.2104.D ► Transitional ,Setbacks -1-1 Limited Industrial District ;Pag+e ZB A- I -Z-95 and ZBA-2-, -9 14.2224 Central Area Parking Regulations 14.306 Accessory Structures 14.2207 Parking Area Design Also included are map amendments to rezone the subject properties FROM: P-1, 8.2, 1, B-31) , B- , .-31) R-11 R-41) 1-1,1-2. and B-4 Districts O. ; B-5 Central Commercial and l - 5C Central Commercial Core District. Village Planner Ray Forsythe then su a ed the rezoning of the properties, the text amendments which directly affect the 5 district and the text amendments which affect the overall Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Forsythe stated in October, 1993, the Village Board approved a major revision to the gong Ordinance which included` the creation of the -5 and B -5C Districts. At that tu* e, a ;number of properties were proposed to be rezoned to the newly created B-5 and B -5C district. However, the Village did not meet the legal notice requirements of the Zoning Cade and therfore these properties were never officially rezoned. Mr. Forsythe referenced the area to be properties along Northwest Highway from Mount Prospect Road to Henry Street, South along Prospect Avenue to Maple Street and North to 40 N. Main Street and the Post Office property and office properties. stated that in ars effort to garner sufficient input from property owners in the proposed downtowt district, staff has held two public meetings to explain the proposal (October 201, 1994 and November 101, 1994). The, a ached B-5 zoning text has been modified to reflect comments received at these meetings. These modifications include the following* 1. The list of allowable conditional uses has been expanded to include animal hospitals., utornobile garages and drive-through/drive-mi establishments. 2. The minimum building setbacks have been o+dif iii+ed to require a setback in areas where a nt yard setback has been previously established. This is primarily a concern along Prospect_ Avenue. Currently, several of these offices are set back 30 feet from the -property line. It was agreed that it would be inappropria a to allow one of the lots within this area to be built to the front property line when ' all other properties are seat back 30 3. Staff"` has modified the transitional setback section to :reflect existing conditions along Prospect Avenue and Northwest est Hii hway. Staff" has revised the text to permit parking with the required, rear yard setback if adjacent to a dedicated public alleyway. This modification would eliminate several non -conforming situations that exist throughout the downtown area. Page 3 ZBA- I -A-95 and ZBA-2-Z-95 Mr. Forsythe further noted that parking standards had been added for drive thru facilities and for the Library. JanetKoy, 409 S. Albert Street, introduced herself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Ms. Koy raised concerns regarding insufficient parking along Northwest Highway. She stated that customers of Midas Muffler and other surrounding businesses park on both sides of Albert Street and asked the Zoning Board what could be done to alleviate this problem. Staff stated that the proposed rezoning would not affect the parking on public streets and that this issue should be directed to the Safety Committee for consideration of possible parking restrictions,., Kenneth Gauger, 117 S. Pine Street, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Gauger inquired about the vacant property at 115 S Pine Street. He stated that currently it is privately owned and wondered what the B-5 zoning would do to the property and imquired about the fature plans of the parcel. In response, Community Development Director, Bill Cooney, stated that there aren't any immediate plans for that parcel.. The pie shaped parcel is currently vacant and could be developed as a parking lot (which would be required to be paved) or commercial property. However, he knew of no immediate plans for that parcel. Gary Haines, 422 E. Northwest Highway, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Haines stated that he is the owner of Bruce Automotive and asked what effect the B-5 zoni'ng would have on his business. He stated that the Ordinance requires that all cars must be worked on inside. If he was to work on a car outside, he would be in violation of the code. Mr. Cooney stated that currently auto uses are permitted uses on his property and under the B-5 provision, it would require a Conditional Use. He stated that the use can be continued as long as no major addditions, or alterations were proposed. Tom Davies, 203 S. Ower4 introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. r Davies first commented that he and 2 other neighbors did not receive a notice of tonights meeting and felt the Village should have notified them. He was informed by Staff that those properties did not receive a notice because they were not withing 250 feet of the proposal. Mr. Davies then inquired about the townhouses on School & Evergreen. He a sked if these could remain R-3 residential. Mr. Cooney stated that the townhouses are developed as a PUD (Planned Unit Development) and modification to these units would d d r r71 g equire an amendment to the PUD. Also, in response to Mr. Davies' question regarding home businesses, Mr. Cooney stated the Village has specific regulations pertaining to Ioccupations. Mr. Lannon stated that the B-5 District classification would provide higher density multi- family residential uses and would be beneficial to the downtown redevelopment. The 0 Page 4 B. - I -A-95 and ZBA-2-Z-95 Zoning Board generally discussed Mr. Davies' comments with regard to allowing' theR-3 District to remain in that area, Mr. Cooney Mated that at the time tW the Clocktower P. .D. came through for Village approval, Staff believed that the subject property had been properly rezoned to 15C. However, as Mr. Forsythe stated, proper notice was not met for the original downtown rezoning proposal, and therefore the floc tower property is still zoned B-3. The proposed rezoning would remedy this oversight, Mr. Lannon asked if the boundaries are deferent from the proposal in October 1993 In response, Mr. Forsythe stated the boundaries have been reduced on Maple south of Busse to exclude the townhouses. The Village parking lot will remain as a P 1 restrict. Also, the the -5 Core was reduced to minimize i act on the surrounding neighborhoods. ds. In addition, Mr. Cooney stated the addition of the "pie"shaped lot mentioned by Mr. Gauger. Mr. Edward J. Busse, '19 & 21 S. Emerson,' introduced himself to the Zoning Board o Appeals. Mr. Busse stated that he along with his brother own the 2 residential properties across from the Senior tenter. He raised concerns with the new B-5 rezoning affecting his prop ' taxes. Mr. gooney stated that he checked with the County in regards to this situation and although he couldn't obtain anything in writing, he was informed that the County looks at the use and location of property not the underlying zoning when'assessing taxes, Mr. Wallace Busse introduced himself to the ,honing Board of Appeals. He asked the Board Why the two parcels, mentioned above, couldn't be excluded from the rezoning. He is very concerned about his property taxies being raised if his property is 'rezoned to B-5. Chairman Basnik stated that it is possible to exclude the two properties. However, it is very unlikely considering the location. The properties ' are surrounded by the Library, Senior Center, Village Fall and First Chicago Bank. The properties would be included the B-5 but not in the B-5 Core District. Mr. Chris Maret, 6 N. Emerson, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of ,Appeals.. Mr. Maret lives 3 lots North of Central and inquired about the proposed changes to the Transitional Setbacks. Mr. Cooney stated the public alleyway behind Mr. ] are^t's propeart would not be affected ed by the landscapiIng landscapingrequirements. Mr. Lannon then moved to approve the snap meats to rezone the subject properties with the exception of the Hemphill Property From: P-1, B-2. B-3, B-2, R-3, .-1, -4, I- 11) 1-2, and B-r4 restricts To: B-5 Central Commercial and B-5C ventral Core District as shown. in Petitioners exhibit 1. The motion was seconded by Mr. Floros. Page 5 ZBA- I -A-95 and ZBA-2-Z-95 Upon Roll Call: AYES.- Basnik,, Cassidy, Floros, Lannon, Luxe, Verhasselt NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the Zoning Ordinance Amendments to include the following - 1. 14.303. Conditional Uses: to add Convalescent Home -Nursing Home as a Conditional use in the R-4 District. 2. 14.305.D.1 Regulations for Specific Accessory Structures and Uses. (Garbage Dumpsters and Recycling Containers.) a. Required. All multi-farnily buildings utilmiing centralized solid waste services shall provide a ,garbage dumpster and recycling container area which meets the in* standards which have been established by the Solid Waste Coordinator. b. Location. Outdoor designated garbage dumpsters and recycling containers shall maintain the same setbacks as parking lots. Dumpsters and containers that are located within covered parking areas shall be designed so that they do not conflict with required parking spaces or access drives. c. Screenig. such dumpsters and containers shall be screended on all sides by a solid wood fence or equivalent screening material to a height not less than six (6) feet. 3. 14.1504.D.1 14.1604.D.1 14.704.D.1) 14.1804.D.10 14.2004.D.1) 14.2iO4.D., Transitional Setbacks. Proposed: Where a side or rear lot line in a B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4, O -R and 1-1 District abuts any residential zoning district,, all buildings structures and parking lots shall meet the required yard setback. Such setback shall be landscaped as required in Section 14.2306 and 14.2308 of the Landscape Requirments- 4. 14.2215.A. Driveways (Residential) Proposed: Construction. Driveways and driveway approaches shall be paved with concrete, bituminous concrete or paver bricks in accordance with the construction standards set forth in the Development Code. 5. 14.306.A-4. Accessory Structures Proposed: Separation Between Buildings. A detached accessory building or structure shall be located no closer to the principal building than ten (10) feet. However, where a detached accessory building or structure is constructed with Piro -ranted materials, the rri " separation Permitted is three (3) feet. Decks attached to the principal building are permitted to attach to a swimming pool if all required rear and sideyard setbacks are met and the deck is designed with a gate between the deck and pool and access is provided to the yard from the deck. 00/ Page 6 ZBA-1-A 9 and ZBA-2-Z-95 The Zoning Board then discussed each proposed amendment. Mr. Lannon would like to eliminate the R-5 District. He feels this is age discrimination. CurTently, the only R-5 District *in the Village iis the Senior apartments on Westgate. The IN Board discussed the future ion of this zoning. In -response to the amendment for age dumpsters, Mr. Cassidy felt that the wording is too " vague and there should be firmer standards. Mr. Lannon stated that he feels this is not a zoning issue and should be eliminated from the zoning code. He proposed that the location should be placed on the application form. In regards to the amendment for Transitional Setbacks, Mr. Lannon asked staff if the actual :setback would change. Mr. Cooney stated that the setbacks would remain the same. Currently, commercial property is required to provide and maintain a landscaped 8' buffer, to residential and the proposed amendment would alleviate the 8' requirement. In regard to the Accessory Structure amendment, Mr. Lannon stated that he feels it is inappropriate to require fire rated materials *inside due to additional cost factors. Staff stated that currently the Village allows accessory structures 10' x 12' (120 square feet). The proposed amendment would allow smaller parcels to add accessory structures to their property - Mr. Verhasselt then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve the following amendments as permitted in Section 14.203.D. The amendments include text amendments to the following sections: 14.904; 14.905.B.!- 14.9051 Article MX - B-5 Central Coriunercial District 14.1303 Conditional Uses - R-4 Multi, Family District 14.1504.D Transitional Setbacks - B- I Business Office 14.1604. Transitional Setbacks - B-2 Neighborhood Shopping Dist. 14.1704.D Transitional Setbacks - B-3 Community 1119 ShopPi Dist. 14.1804.D Transitional Setbacks - B-4 Busni*es Retail & Ste. Dist. 14.2004.D Transitional Setbacks - O -R Office Research District 14.2104.D Transitional Setbacks - 1-1 Limited District 14.2224 Central Area Parking Regulations 14.306 Accessory Structures 14.2207 Parldng Area Design Said amendments as outlined in petitioners exhibit I and exhibit 2 comprisingof 2 separate memos to this board. r � ZBA-1-A-95 and ZBA-2-Z-95 Mr. Lannon then asked about the wording under the Parking Regulations. Chairman Basnik changed the proposed wording for drive-in/drive-up facility to include Four 4 stacking spaces for each lane plus those =spaces required for the princi al use. This would include ATM's (Automatic Teller Machines). The motion was then seconded by lir. Lannon.. Upon Roll Call: AYES: B snik, Cassidy, Floras, Lu ems, Verhasselt NAYS.- Lannon Mr. Lannon, stated the reasons for the no vote includes the language in the code for umpsters and the fire rated material in sheds. The motion was approved by a vote of 5-1 Mr. Lannon then moved that staff investigate the legalities of an amendment to eliminate the .-5 ;morning caul, The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy. Rpspu" fly., b itted, nli d Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois It> TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT', DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1995 SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - GENERALIZED LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION TO CENTRAL COMMERCIAL AREA FOR DOWNTOWN AND SECTIONS OF NORTHWEST HWY. The Village of Mount Prospect is requesting that the above noted area be redesignated in its Generalized Land Use map with a Central Commercial Area classification. In addition, staff recommends that the Village incorporate a Central Commercial Area narrative in the Comprehensive Plan. The change is being recommended in order to replace the current Generali ' zed Land Use Map designations in this district with one unified district that will permit and encourage desirable downtown uses and redevelopment. Staff is recommending that the following narrative be added to the Comprehensive Plan on Page 17. CentralCMmg,[gi_al Argg, should accommodate retail and specialty shops, businesses, professional offices, multi -family residential uses above a first floor and civic uses that are characteristic of a traditional downtown area. The emphasis should focus on businesses that provide consumer goods and services that are easily accessible by pedestrians, public transportation and motor vehicles. Businesses, professional offices and governmental offices should be encouraged to be located at the periphery of this area since the primary focus is to attract high levels of pedestrian activity for retail, service and specialty shops. Special attention should be paid to existing high traffic movement, intensity of development and the role of the downtown as a center of the Village in any future developments. The Plan Commission met in regular session on February 1, 1995 and held a public hearing on this item. Notice of this public hearing was placed in the Mount Prospect Journal on January 13, 1995 and property owners were notified by letter of the hearing on January 10, 1995. After the hearing was closed, the Plan Commission voted 5-1 with one abstention to approve both the proposed change in the generalized land use map and to add the above noted text to the Comprehensive Plan. Please forward this memorandum to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their February 7, 1995 meeting. WJC:hg V(LI.Ji,L� MOUI, T PPC' �:? ICT PLAN CCIvu%liI S.SI O11 February 1, 1995.. T'he regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan. Commission :is calle'JI, to or�.Ai er by Chcni rman Ponzi at 8 -9 00 Pat the Senior Cen t er, 5C :.)c u h �� 1rSo ;z 13treet, Mount -rc Dect, Illinois, V �L u.; Present at Poll Call : It chael Ho ffman Carel Tortorel�o Edvori n Janus Loul s Velasco b am 'Red' 111iarshall Ponz , Chairman. June Richards +c t: prank 3oege Angela la Vol Vie. Jllave Staff Present, i"Lichael Sims, Tillage planner U thers: _ See attached. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ,Mrs VI questoned the correction made in the previous minutes and said the reference to Lavergne Avenue should be deleted. A motion was then made by Mr. Velasco with a second by Mr. Hoffman, to approve the minutes as amended of January 18.- 1995. Tiotion. passes 6-0 with 1 abstention, SU3')I VI SI . S bone CCTV d"1I TT . C T S 9 Community Development Wo report ,Z. Comprehensive Plan No report C. Development Cade 1,1r, Janus stated the Committee of the 7jhole had reviewed the Cade at their 1-24 meeting and the only point of contention seemed to be the 25fo' maximum expanslon on residential that they felt should be increased.. Staff is working on a draft that V11111 go back to the Board in the near ,future,. D. Tet Amendment No report 0."1 J1 BUSIN S)S isone BUSINESS Chairman Ponzi opens the Public Hearing at 8.08 PM on the Comprehensive Plan -- Generalized Land Use Map and Designation to Central Commercial Area for Do',sntown and Sections of Northwest Highway. Mr. Sims states that p .blzc not, went out to property owners on January 9 and the bac e ,in;g of ,o, wasu l shed in the 1-13 Mount Prospect Journal. �6 ; ; ,iso expl :� Zoe r d Co pr;e Off! ire Plan (CP) differences He points mut sere f�"ernt u,aes on, the pret,ent map and the 3-5 map of the Central er i tin t uses an a singleproperty that gill o sero e�, s���a� d � far dens* buildings. �}n l- the Z �� met d ppro ed this, con ep for A except for the Village commons regi-- dential area. Which is a PUD. Phone calls have been received by Stat f asks n; if any proposed changes prompted this consolidation ,anad the answer is no. Louis Atsavis, oim r of Central Plaza, commenAs the Village for their plan and would like his property included in the -, C Centr,al 3usliness, Core lstrict so that it would have more usage* Mr. Sims states that the Zb has already designated the map make-up aid it lll go before the 5 V l,l - -e Board. 2--7--9."5. 71 -Ile should: plan to appear there if hev, ht u1 at that time. Rich ,Scholl of 12 South Maple is concerned about ,zero setback abutting resi- d anti al property. Mr. Sims tells hire this i s a zoning quests on but explains the situation. 11 11 • " r# "' dM 40 of it It IN 0 if .r wr i .ir • " i • .. � • i III . • s tI • rI a o, It ww r � #t .. N ' tr aN • If It r� a ✓ • rr ` r • ■ +� tr +IV - - a , - a ✓ +a rt ✓ a .. • - . II .� .. • +a trr - +� U a • rt a .. ../I 11 y, • yl/ ✓ I r ' r .. '� ! III � Ir ✓ � • .. • r! • • ..Ap Wwjil�vj • Respectfully subMitte , Carel Tortorell 0001? co�l r`3J� e. c� � Q-A �a� yob K/S / °S Ct/ fipo sig'€�— '�-,TS�✓C ( �G�f 2-✓��a�r4 crx.«C.,,o."� CAF 7/2/93 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT RELATIVE TO PROPERTY CO' MQNLY KN!PWN AS WHI.,54PERING CREEK SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Semar Builders (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has requested modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) for property commonly known as Whispering Creek Subdivision (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 16 in Whispering Creek Estates Subdivision, being a subdivision in the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois; WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the following modifications from the Development Code: I To allow a slope of 4 to 1 ratio beginning one foot (1') above the normal water level, rather than 6 to 1 ratio. 2. To allow the structures on Lot 7 and Lot 9 to be no closer than twenty-five feet (25') from the stormwater detention facility provided on Lot 8, rather than the required 75 feet; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission did consider the modifications from the Development Code, as set forth hereinabove, at their regular meeting held on May 11, 1994 and have recommended to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that these modifications be granted; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that the best interests of the Village would be served in granting the modifications requested herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTIONQN . E: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate herein as , findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. �SECTION That modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) are hereby granted to the Subject Property as follows: 1. To allow a slope of 4 to 1 ratio beginning one foot (1') above the normal water level, rather than 6 to 1 ratio. 2. To allow the structures on Lot 7 and Lot 9 to be no closer than twenty-five feet (25') from the stormwater detention facility provided on Lot 8, rather than the required 75 feet; and 0 Whispering Creek Modifications Page 2 of 2 SECTION THREE,, Except for the modifications granted herein, all other requirements of said Development Code shall apply to the Subject Property. S.,,ECTION FO R, This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1,1996. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois le" TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1995 SUBJECT: WHISPERING CREEK ESTATES - FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION 1059 109 AND 111 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD The applicant, Semar Home Builders, Inc. is seeking approval of a final plat of subdivision which will create 15 single family residential lots and one outlot for stormwater detention. The site consists of three 100' x 700' single family lots. Each has a significant slope to the rear towards Weller Creek. The site is bordered to the east, west and south by R-1 Single Family Residential Districts and to the north by Westbrook School. Weller Creek runs along the eastern boundary of the property. The Village Board approved the preliminary plat of subdivision on November 1, 1994. The petitioner has since obtained final engineering approval and all required utility approvals. The final plat has been completed in substantial compliance with the preliminary plat and meets all the standards of the Development Code. The Plan Commission recommended approval of the final plat at their February 1, 1995 meeting. Ina Section 16.405.F.2.e states that stormwater detention facilities shall have a side slope no steeper than 6 horizontal to I vertical. The applicant is requesting approval of a 4 horizontal to I vertical slope for the detention facility on outlot 8. Staff would note that the high water level of the facility would be 10 feet from the east property line on Lot 7 and north property line of Lot 9. Staff would also note that 4:1 side slopes have been approved in the past. Such approval included the development at Miller Station (Kimball Hill project). The detention facility will be privately maintained. The Plan Commission heard this item on May 11, 1994 and recommended that it be approved by a vote of 7-0. Section 16.405.F. I of the Development Code requires stormwater detention facilities be located not leg-tha' `73Tft, from any building or structure to be occupied. The applicant is �s I . ....... . n a iM'-"foot ----'> separation. This is the same separation being proposed in the revised Development Code. Simi, .'ar, requests have been granted by the Village on other single family developments. The Plan Commission heard this item on May 11, 1994 and voted 7-0 in favor of approving a 25 foot separation between stormwater facilities on outlot 8 and structures on Lots 7 and 9. Please forward this memorandum and attached copy of the final plat to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their February 7, 1995 meeting. WHISPERING CREEK ESTATES BEING A SUBDIVISION IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. W M14 N881 57' 344 25. 25' d! -- o CD cs cm Cl . — ... . cr IIADrJd IAC UCAQIAQFII ALONG THE NEST LINE) OF & PARALLEL NITH THE SOUTH LtNE dF LO( IF* Mount Prospect Public Works Department 110111:1 To: Mike Janonis, Village Manager Carol Fields, Village Clerk From.* Jeff Wulbecker, Village Engineer Date: January 23, 1995 Subject.* Evergreen Woods Townhomes Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The work has been satisfactorily completed and I recommend approval of this project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting. -�:qi7t q (11 Y'0'b 1, 1111: I]w LIAO 4 40,11 :.P PRI"T3 1XPROV]=,NT "P V" PROJECT: =0 elan, I MWIM :AMu's TQ'3iq]:b! �Aes momom Now � 1�6144iy a-Wilapp mommw� m DATZ:..,D cember 19.9 1994 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED* PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED* ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING APPROVAL: PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ROADWAYS SIDEWALKS 2,29.9 fij! .. ....... .... STET REGULATORY SIGNS --1 STREET LIGHTS C., J..... PARKWAY TREES #,, 115 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING . ...... RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS ENGINEER CLERK CLERK 'ENGINEER PLANNING PUB, WKS, DIR INSP.SERV,DIR. FIRE PREVENTION APPROVED BY BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,, COOK I COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF 19 Village Clerk MAINTAIN Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ................ . TO: Village Manager FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: February 3, 1.995 SUBJ: Bel Aire Lane Reconstruction There is a recommendation before the Village Board to award a contract for the reconstruction of Linneman Rd. at a cost of $1,148,859.02. Included in the base bid is the installation of storm sewers, a single street light and pavement resurfacing on Bel Aire Lane. At the public meeting a couple of residents wanted all of the existing roadway surface and base removed at no cost to them. our position should be that anything more than what is included in the base bid is an extra and the residents of Bel Aire Lane would participate in the cost. A survey is being sent to those residents which will define what their share of the added cost would be. If the residents still want to have the added work done and are willing to pay the cost, the contract for Linneman Rd. will have to be modified. Herbert L. Weeks HLW/eh BELAIRE/FILES/STREETS To: Herb Weeks, Public Works Director From: Jeff Wulbecker, Village Engineer JAI Date: February 2, 1995 Subject: Bel Aire Lane Reconstruction The Linneman Road Improvements include grinding off the existing asphalt and resurfacing of Bel Aire Lane. The cost of this resurfacing is estimated to be $5,097. Consideration was given to reconstruction and widening of the Bel Aire Lane pavement to Village standards and installation of curb and gutter and sidewalk (Option 1). This option was unanimously rejected by the Residents of Bel Aire Lane. A resident attending the Linneman Road Meeting on January 14, suggested reducing the cost for the improvements by eliminating the pavement widening, curb and gutter and sidewalk and reconstructing the street to its existing width, 20'. (The Village standard is 31' from back of curb to back of curb). As requested I have developed costs for this alternate improvement (Option 2) to Bel Aire Lane. A comparison of the two options follows: Option 1: 1. Reconstruction of the existing pavement. 2. 4' of pavement widening to each side of the street 3. Curb and gutter 4. Sidewalk Village policy has been that if the residents participate by sharing the cost of the new improvements (such as the widening, curb and sidewalk), the Village would be responsible for the full cost of the existing pavement reconstruction. This option was unanimously opposed by the property owners. Option 2: 1. Reconstruction of the existing pavement. (Including removal and replacement of base and asphalt surface). Village policy has been that the residents and the Village would share equally in the cost of reconstructing a street if it is not being constructed to Village standards. The estimated cost to the Village is $12,205. The following tVble illustrates the comparative cost to each property owner for the twit options. ADDRESS 645 Bel Aire Lane 660 Bel Aire Lane 665 Bel Aire Lane 670 Bel Aire Lane COST OF OPTION 1 $ 806.33 $ 839.47 $ 870.68 $1$631.65 COST OF OPTION 2 $ 812.00 $ 840.00 $ 882.00 $1$638.00 675 Bel Aire Lane $19611.82 $1,624.00 680 Bel Aire Lane $1,541.18 $11554.00 685 Bel Aire Lane $11541.18 $1,554.00 690 Bel Aire Lane $11541.18 $11554.00 695 Bel Aire Lane . .. . .............. $1,541.18 $1,544.00 The costs are very similar due to the Village's participation policies as stated previously. Based on the Bel Aire Lane property owners' rejection of option 1 and the comparable cost of option 2, 1 anticipate that they will also be opposed to option L. 1 am preparing a survey for distribution to the residents on option 2 and will report to you the results. k THIN `V Fount Prospect Public Works Department 49. w INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Mike Janonis, Village Manager From: Jeff Wulbecker, Village Engineer Dater February 2, 1995 Subject: Linneman Road Improvements Attached please find the bid tab for the subject project. Also attached is a recommendation fro !tants, Triton Engineers, favorable to the low bidder, , , to Joint Venom 1I concur with their recommend -in, -to award the i Hnrvw,rrwNAwwtw wni'+.' iunri orf rrtwrnwlw..rwesf»"„ »oiw r„uw contract to Allied Asphalt�, I Plote Joint Venture in the am�oun� �df 148 859.02 at the next Village Board Meeting. They have successfully completed, simile -p j0cf§6,'n various villages in the past. Funding for this project is shown on Page 221 of the 1994/1995 budget under Account Code No. 58-077-71-8519, which has been budgeted in the amount of $1,500,000. I concur with the above recommendation. X Herbert L. Weeks M wm r (Y It Public Works Director V un F �V xA 1400 J , BM1111 Engineers &, Manners TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS - A DIVISION OF JBM ENGINEERS & PLANNERS, INC. February 2, 1995 Mr. Jeffrey A. Wulbecker village Engineer Village of Mount Prospect 1700 W. Central Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Reference: Linneman Road Golf Road to Dempster Street Dear Mr. Wulbecker: On Tuesday, January 31, 1995 at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the Linneman Road Improvement Project. At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud. 04CM-101406 Twenty-nine Contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of fourteen Contractors submitted bids. The bids ranged from a low of $1,148,859.02 by Allied Asphalt Paving Company and Plote, Inc., a joint venture to a high of $1,461,365.05 by Johnson Paving. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $1o3041423.25. All Bidders submitted • Bonds in the amount • 5 • • their total bid as required by the Contract Documents. All bidders • signed their bids and bid bonds. Attached are Bid Tabulation Sheets for the project. The bid tabulation sheets identify each of the bidder's unit prices, total bid read aloud at the bid opening, and the total bid as corrected. 830 North Meacham Road, Schaumburg, Illinois 60173-4922 * (708) 605-%00 • (708) 605-%10 FAX Kansas City, I%ssouri/Des Moines, Iowa/Dallas/Fort Worth/Austin, Texas/Greenville, South CarolinaVChicago, Illinois Johnson County/Liberal/Dodge City/Independence/Great Bend, Kansas/Raleigh, North Carolina RECYCI ED 19 RECYCLAISLE Mr. Jeffrey A. Wulbecker, P.E. BM February 2, 1995 '1 Page 2 T R I T 0 N M A, I 'ffgL;MK0 &* W -LARz The low bidder, Allied Asphalt Paving Company and Plate, Inc., a joint venture, has performed work of this type and magnitude many times in the area. The quality of their work is good. We are familiar with the services provided by Allied Asphalt Paving Company and Plote, Inc. We recommend the Village award them this contract with a bid price of $1,148,859.02. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Very truly yours, TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS A Division of JBM Engineers & Planners, Inc. Vito P. Sammarco, P.E. VPS :djg Linneman Road - Bid Tabulation Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Bid Opening Date, January 31, 1895 Item Hems No, Quantity Unit 1 TREE REMOVAL (6 TO 20 INCH DIAMETER) 58 IN DIA 2 TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED 9 EACH 3 EARTH EXCAVATION 5464 CU YD 4 EMBANKMENT 1093 CU YD 5 POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT, SUBGRADE 700 CU YD 6 TRENCH BACKFILL 2195 CU YD 7 SUB -BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE B 4' 17233 SO YD 8 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 4' 196 SO YD 9 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 8' 958 So YD 10 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 12' 657 SO YD 11 TOP SOIL PLACEMENT 4' 11562 SQ YD 12 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, 0' 619 Std YD 13 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 8' 15734 SO YD 14 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 8 1375 TON 15 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT) 14 TON 16 AGGREGATE tPRIME COAT) 34 TON 17 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE, MIXTURE 8, TYPE 2 1467 TON 16 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, CLASS 1, 1587 TON TYPE 2 Total 19 PROTECTIVE COAT 3873 SO YD 20 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 1, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 781 FOOT STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS IV 12' Amounts 21 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 1, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 125 FOOT STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS IV 15' Amounts 2 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 881 FOOT STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 12- Amounts 23 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 956 FOOT STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 15' 24 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 297 FOOT STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS III 18' $15,00 25 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 948 FOOT STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 24' $13.40 26 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 30' 26ASTORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 36' Sheet 1 of 4 for Contractors 1 - 5 27 FOOT $38,00 1 � 2 3 4 5 ENGINEER'S I ESTIMATE E ALLIED ASPHALTIPLOTE ARROW ROAD ROSSI CONTRACTORS HARDIN PAVING ABBEY PAVING JOINT VENTURE CONSTRUCTION - AND SEALCOATING Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Price Amounts L Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts $15,00 $870,00 $15.00 $870.00 $13.40 $777.20 $2000 $1,160.00E $2200 $1,27600 $9,10 $527.80 $350,00 $3,150.00E $165.00 $1,485,00"' $255.00 $2,295.00 $250.00 $2,250.00 $275.00 $2,475.00 $160.00 $1,440.00 $10.00 $54,840.00: $12.50 $68,300.00 $1180 $75,403.20 $10.60 $57,918.401 $14,85 $81,140.40 $16-85 $92,068,40 $8:00 $8,744.00E $2.00 $2,186,00 $2.05 $2,240.65 $1.00 $1,093.00I $2.20 $2,404.80 $16-85 $18,417,05 122,00 $15,400.001 $18.50 $12,950.00'" $19-90 $13,830.00 $19.65 $13,755.00 $17.80 $12,320,Ofl $25.20 $17,8401.00 $22,00 $48,290,00 $20.00 $43,900,00 $25.00 $54,875.001 $12.25 $28,888.75 $20.35 $44,668.25 $26.601 $58,387.010 $3.00 $51,699.00 $3.45 $59,453,85 $2.45 $42,220.85 $150 $60,315.50 $3.15 $54,283.85 $2.78 $47,907.74 $3.00 $588,00 $4.00 $784,00E $1.80 $352.80 $4,00 $784.00 $10.45 $2,048,20' $2,85 $558.80 $5,00 $4,790,00 $7.00 $6,708.00 E $15.50 $14,849,001 $6,00 $7,884.00 $5.10 $4,885.801 $5.54 $5,307.32 $8.00 $5,256.00 $10,00 $6,570,001 $23.25 $15,275.25 E $12.00 $7,884.00 $7.50 $4,927.50 $6.30 $5,453.10 $1,25 $14,477.50 E $1,21 $14,014,221 $1-40 816,214.80 $1,35 $15,63570 $1.50 $17,373,00 $1.40 $16,214.80 $11.00 $6,609,00- $13.00 $8,047.001 $22,80 $14,113.20 $27.00 $16,713.00 $7.75 $4,787.25 $9.14 $5,657.88 $13.00 $204,542.00,( $9.70 $152,619.80 $10,35 1 $162,846.901 $10.35 $162,846.90' $10.35 $162,846.90 - $12.19 $191,787.46 $8,00 $11,000,00�� $11.50 $15,812=50 $14.05 $19,318.75 $10,70 $14,712.50 $10,25 $14,093.751 $12.80 $17,325.00 $200.00 $2,800.001 I $15000 $2,100.00 $1.00 $14.00 $1,010 $14.010 $580.00 $8,260.001 $24600 $3,444.00 $7.00 $238.00= $25.00 $850.00 $1.00 $34.00 $1.00 $34.00 $33.00 $1,122.00 E $70.00 $2,380,00 $28.00 $41,076.00 $25.05 $36,748,35 $28.95 $42,469,85' $28.00 $42,543.00 $24.85 i $36,454,951 $29.05 $42,631,02 $30.00 $47,610.001 t $32.10 $50,942,70 r $38.00 $60,306.00 $38.00 I $80,308.00 $28.45 $41,976.15 $30.90 $49,038.30 $0,60 $2,323.80 r $0,55 $2,130.15 $0.65 $2,517.45 $0.85 $2,517.45 $0.80 $3,098.40 $0.75 $2,904,75 $23.00 $17,963.00 $20.00 $15,620,00 E I $17.85 $13,940,85 $25-00 $19,525.00 $22.00 $17,182.00'^ $21.52 $16,607,12 $25.00 $3,125.00. $25.00 $3,125.00 $20.00 $2,500.00' $27.00 $3,375,00 $24.20 $3,025.0011 $23.80 $2,975.00 $22.00 $19,382.00 $20.00 $17,620,00 $17.85 $15,725.85 $25,00 $22,025.00 $22.00 $19,382.00 $21.52 $18,959.12 $24-00 oI $22,94.4.00 $25.00 $23,900M $20.00 $19,120.001 $27.00 $25,812M $24.20 $23,135.20 , $22,10 $21,127,80 $28.00 $8,316,00 E $30.00 $8,910.00 $23.75 $7,053.75 E $37,00 $10,989.00 $28,80 $8,494.20 E $28.85 $8,568.45 $32.001 i $301,336.00 E $40,00 $37,920,00, $27.55 E $26,117.401 $44,00 $41,712.00 $38.50 $36,498.00 $3825 $36,281,00 $1,026,001 - $55.00 $1,485 00 3=10 $1,183 701 $75-0101 $2,025,001' $40,70 $1,098.90 $75.00 $2,025>Cli1 I 336 FOOT $5000 $16,800,0011 $6000 $20,160 00 j $51.80 $17,404,801 $70.00 $23,520.00 $44,001 $14,784,00 ( $55.66 $18,768.96 Linneman Road - Bid Tabulation Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Bid Opening Date: January 31, 1995 Item Items No. 27 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, STORM DRAIN AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 40' 28 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1, 12' 29 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1, 15' 30 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 2, 18' 31 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 2, 24- 32 STORM SEWERS, DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52,12- 33 STORM SEWERS, DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52, 15' 34 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 6' 35 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 10' 36 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 12* 37 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 15, 38 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 182 39 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 215 40 CATCH BASINS, TYPE A, 4' -DIA., TYPE 1 FRAME, OPEN LID 41 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 4' -DIA., TYPE I FRAME, CLOSED LID 42 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 5' -DIA., TYPE I FRAME, CLOSED LID 43 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 6-01A., TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID 44 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 6' -DIA., TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSE) LID RESTRICTOR PLATE 45 SANITARY MANHOLE FRAME AND LID REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT 46 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE BOXES TO BE ADJUSTED 47 INLETS, TYPE A, TYPE I FRAME, OPEN LID 48 CATCH BASINS TO BE REMOVED 49 MANHOLES TO BE REMOVED 50 INLETS TO BE REMOVED 51 MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED 52 WATER VALVES TO BE ADJUSTED 53 CATCH BASINS TO BE FILLED 54 MANHOLES TO BE FILLED 55 INLETS TO BE FILLED 56 CONCRETE CURB, TYPE 6 57 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12 58 PAVEMENT REMOVAL 59 DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVAL Sheet 2 o 4 for Contractors 1 - 5 1 2 3 4 5 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ALLIED ASPHALTPLOTE 1 ARROW ROAD ROSSI CONTRACTORS HARDIN PAVING ABBEYPAVING JOINT VENTURE CONSTRUCTION AND SEALCOATING Quantity Unit E Unit Total I Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total I Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts 274 FOOT I $moo $23,290,00 11 $85,00 $23,290,001 $77.00 $21,098,00 $79.00 $21,646.00 $71.50 $19,591.00 $81.50 $22,331.00 153 FOOT $25.00 $3,825,00 $30,00 $4,590.00. $18,65 $2,853.451 $26.00 $3,978,00 $24.20 $3,702.60 $22,10 $3,381.30 15 FOOT $26.00 $420,00 $31.00 $465.00 $20;65 $309-751 $28.00 $420,00 $26.40 $396,00 $27,50 $412.50 20 FOOT $30.00 $600.00 $35.00 $700.00. $24,50 $490.001 $38.00 $780,001 $30.80 $518.00'$29,75 $595.00 20 FOOT $35,00 $700,00 $50,00 $1,000.00 $2850 $570,001 $45.00 $900.00 $40.70 $814.00 $35.56 $711.20 70 FOOT $30,00 $2,100,001 $50,00 $3,500.00 $30,75 $2,152.501 $32.00 $2,240-00 $27.50 $1,925.00 $36.10 $2,527.00 129 FOOT $35,00 $4,515.00 $60.00 $7,740.00 $40.55 $5,230951 $40.00 $5,160.00 $33.00 $4,257.00 $40,80 $5,263.20 70 FOOT $10,00 $700,00 $11-00 $770.00 $2.30 $161,00 $1.00 $70.00 $11.00 $770.00 $6,36 $445.20 40 FOOT $10.00 $400,00 $11,00 $440,001 $2,30 $92.00 $1.00 $40.00 $11.00 $440-00 $6,36 $254.40 110 FOOT $1000 $1,100,001 $11-00 $1,210.00 $2.30 $253.00 $2.00 $220.00 $11.00 $1,210.00 $8.36 $699.60 310 FOOT $10.00 $3,100.00 $11.00 $3,410.00 $2,30 $71100 = $3.00 $930.00 $13.20 $4,092,00 $8.40 $2,604-00 30 FOOT $10.00 $300.00 $13.00 $390.00 $3,00 $90.00 $4,00 $120.00 $15.40 $462,00 $8.40 $252.00 30 FOOT $10,00 $300.00 $16.00 $480.00 $3.00 $90,00 1 $5.00 $150.00 $19.80 E E $594.00 E $&40 $252,00 42 EACH $1,200,00 $50,40000 $1,200.00 $50,400.00 $1,198.50 $50,337.00 $1,140.00 $47,880.00 $1,850.00 $69,300.00 $1,097,00 $46,074.00 4 EACH $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $800.00 $3,200.00 $1,25000 $5,000,00 $1,100m $4,400.00 $1,980.00 $7,920.00 $991.00 $3,964.00 11 EACH $1,500.00 $16,500.00 $1,30000 $14,300.00 $1,810,50 $19,915,50 E $1,500,00 $16,500.00 $2,420.00 $26,62000 $1,473,00 $16,203.00 5 EACH $1,800,00 $9$000.0011 $3000,00 111,110,01 $1,011,01 $15,300,1 $3,01,00 $15,10,1 $3,1151,00 $19,250,00 $2,253,00 $11,2115,00 1 EACH $2,300,00 (0 $2,300 $5�000'00 $5,000,00 $5,431,50 $5,431.50 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $4,400,00 $4,400,00 $3,505-00 $3,505:00 11 EACH $500,00 $5,5070.00 $360.00 $3,960,00 $234E60 $2,580.60 $285,00 $3,135.00 $300.00 $3,300.00 $30740 $3,381.40 11 EACH $100.00 $1,100,00 $130.00 $1,430.00€ $92.00 $1,012,00 $5000 $550.00 $66,00 $726.00 $125.00 $1,375.00 E 31 EACH E $500,00 $15,1500-00 $550,00 $17,050.001 $627.30 $19,446,30 $590.00 $18,290.00 $605.00 $18,755,001 $551.00 $17,081,00 4 EACH $200.00 $800,00 $265,00 $1,060,00 $122.40 $489.60 $130,00 $520.00 $220�00 $880.00 $180,00 $720,00 5 EACH $200,00 $1,000m $175.00 $875,00 $316.20 $1,581.00 E $130.00 $650.00 $220= $1,100-00 $180.00 $900-00 8 EACH $150,00 $1,200.00 $100,00 $800.00 $20.40 $163�20 $50-00 30 $400,00 $ 1( $165.00 $1,320,00 $100,00 $800,00 3 EACH $250,00 $750,00, $200.00 $600.00 $230,00 $690.00 $200.00 30 $600.00 $ 6 00 $16&00 $495001 $345.00 $1,035,00 8 EACH $250-00 $2,000-0011 $20000 $1,600,00 i $230-00 $1,940,00 $200.00 $1,60000 $85,00 $680,00' $150.00 $1,200,00 7 EACH $175 00 $1,225.00.1 $200,00 $1,400.00 $127,50 $892.50 $100.00 $700.00 $110.00 $770,00 $175.00 $1,225,00 7 EACH $200,00 $1,400,00 1' $200,00 $1,40000 $127.50 $892.50 $100.00 $700,00 $110.00 $770.00 $175.00 $1,225.00 1 EACH 1$10000 $10000 E $150.00 $150,00- $7650 $76.50. $7500 $75-00 $5520 8;55.20 $60.00 $60,00 412 FOOT $10.00 $4,120,0011 1 $760 $3,13120 $1015 $4,18180 $9,00 $3,70800 $11,90 $4,902.80 $9-50 $3,914,00 8667 FOOT $11,00 $95,337,00 - $8,00 $69,336,00 1 $7,35 $63,702.45 $8.00 $69,336-00 $9,40 $91,469.80 $8,41 $72,889,47 15405 SQ YD $5.50 $84,727,50 $3.00 $46,215,00 $2.85 $43,90425 $3.35 $51,606,75 $2,92 $44,982.60 $2,14 $32,966,70 3106 SQ,YD $4,50 $13,977,00 $4.00 $12,424x00 $3.05 $9,473.30 $3.75 $11,647150 $2,20 $6,833,20 $400 $12,424,00 tinneman Road -- Bid Tabulation Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Bid Opening Date: January 31, 1995 Item Items Na_ 60 CLASS D PATCHES, TYPE III 61 BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVAL (COLD MILLING) 1 1/2' 62 COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL, 63 SIDEWALK REMOVAL 64 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, 8 INCH 65 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5 INCH 66 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 8 INCH 67 FIRE HYDRANTS TO BE MOVED 68 SODDING 69 SUPPLEMENTAL WATERING 70 NITROGEN FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 71 PHOSPHOROUS FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 72 POTASSIUM FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 73 ENGINEER'S FIELD OFFICE, TYPE B 74 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION 75 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING 76 PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE, TYPE 111 4' 77 SIGN PANEL - TYPE 1 78 TELESCOPINGSTEEL SIGNPOST 79 ELECTRIC CABLE IN CONDUIT, 600V (EPR - TYPE USE) 3-1/C NO, 1/0 80 GROUND ROD, 5/8' DIA.X 10 FT. 61 UNIT DUCT, 3-1/C NO.6 AND 1/C NO.8 GROUND, 600V (EPR - TYPE RHW), 1' DIAMETER POLYETHYLENE 82 TRENCH AND BACKFILL FOR ROADWAY LIGHTING 4110 FOOT ) $2.25 $9,247.50 = $1.71 $7,028,101 $1.60 83 CONDUIT IN TRENCH, 2' DIA., GALVANIZED STEEL 545 FOOT $11.50 $6,267,501£ $5.601 $3,052,001 $7.75 84 CONDUIT PUSHED, 2' DIA., GALVANIZED STEEL 500 FOOT $15.00 $7,500.00- $11.30 $5,650.00 $9.70 85 LIGHTING CONTROLLER, PEDESTAL MOUNT 1 EACH $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7900.00 $7,900,00 $7,267,50 85 ELECTRIC SERVICE INSTALLATION 1 EACH 1 $1,000.00 $1,00000 $57200 $572,,00[ $159.917 87 ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION 1 L, SUM $1,000.00 $1,000.00 1 $1,000M $1,000.00 $1,000. 88 LIGHTPOLE FOUNDATION, 24' DIAMETER 250 FOOT $100.00$25,000.00 - $78.00 $19,001100 $53.30 89 REMOVE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION, PARTIAL 90 BREAKAWAY DEVICE; COUPLING, WITH ALUMINUM SKIRT Sheet 3 of 4 for Contractors 1 - 5 35 FOOT $10.00 $350.001 94.95 $173.25 $525 $183.75 $4.85 $173.251 $3.75 $131-251 $3.60 $126.00 26 EACH _ $75.00 $1,950.00_ $56.25 $1,462.50 $63.00 $1,638.00 $56.22 $1,48172` $120.00 $3,120.00 $115.55 $3,004.30 4784 FOOT $5.00 $23,820.00 $2.70 $12,862.80 $3.78 $18,007.92 $2.89 $12,815.16 $2.50 $11,810.00 $2.32 $11,052,48 91 LIGHT POLE, ALUMINUM, 30 FT M.H., 10 FT MAST ARM 92 RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHTING UNIT 93 LUMINAIRE, SODIUM VAPOR, HORIZONTAL MOUNT, 150 WATT 5 EACH 1 $170.00 $850.00 1 $725,00 1 2 25 EACH 3 $8,125,00;, 4 $5,750.00 - 5 21 EACH 1 $1,500,00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ALLIED ASPHALTY'LOTE ARROW ROAD ROSSI CONTRACTORS ' HARDIN PAVING ABBEY PAVING $430.00 $2,150.00 $533.00 JOINT VENTURE CONSTRUCTION $6,300.03 ( $200,00 $4,2003.00 $338.15 AND SEALCOATING $150.00 uantity Unit Unit I Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total $18,915.00 Price Amounts Price Amounts Puce Amounts Price Amow►ts Price Amounts Price Amounts 43 SQ YD $40.00 $1,7217,00 $50.00 $2,150.00 $4275 $1,838,25 $40,00 $1,720.00 $5500 $2,365.00 $34.75 $1,494.25 945 Std YD $2.00 $1,890-00 $4.00 $3,780.00 $3.60 $3,402.00 $3,60 $3,402.00 $4.70 $4,441.501 $3.75 $3,543,75 2351 FOOT $3.00 $7,053,00 $3.00 $7,053.00 $2.15 $5,054,65 $1,15 $2,703.85 $2.20 $5,172.20 $3.60 $8,483-60 1077 SQ FT $1.00 $1,07700 $1.00 $1,077.00 $0.80 $861.60 $5.00 $5,385,00 � $0.55 $592.35 $2.95 $3,177,15 196 SQ YD $24.00 $4,704.00 $22.25 $4,361.00 $24,30 $4,762.80 $20.130 $3,820.00 $21.80 $4,272.80: $21.25 $4,185,00 11789 SQ FT $3.00 $35,36700 $2.05 $24,167.45 $2,35 $27,704.15 � $2,30 $27,114.70 $2.25 $26,525.25 $2.12 $24,992,68 3555 SO FT $3.25 $11,553.75 $2.55 $9,065-25' $2-55 $9,065.25 $2.50 $8,887.50 $2.45 $8,709.75 $2,30 $8,176,50 4 EACH $1,200.00 $4,800.00 £ $1,900.00 $7,600.00 $1,657.50 $6,630,00 1 $1,200A0 $4,800.00 $2,420.00 $9,6811,00 $965.00 $3,660,00 11582 SQ YD $3.00 $34,746.00 1 $1,90 $22,005.80 $2.05 $23,743,10 $2.00 $23,164,00 $2.20 $25,480.40 $2.12 $24,553.84 139 UNIT $10.00 $1,390,00 - $5.00 $695.00 $0.01 $1.391,$0.10 $13,80 $0.00 $0-00 a r $13.013 $0.00 222 POUND $1.00 $222,003 $0,90 $19980' $1.55 1 $344.10 $1.50 $333.00 $1,65 $366,30 $1.56 $346.32 133 POUND $1.00 $133.001 $0.90 $119,701 $1,55 $208.15 $1.50 $199.50 $1,65 $249::45 $1.56 $207.48 89 POUND $1.00 $89.00` $0.90 $80101 $1.55 $137.95 $1.50 $133.501 $1.65 $1148;85 $1.58 $138.84 9 CAL MO $800.00 $7,200.001 $1,125.00 $10,125,00 ` $750.00 $6,750.00 $1,000,00 $9,000.00 $1,100.00 $9,900.130" $900.00 $8,100,00 1 L� SUM -$36,000.00 $36,000.00 $27,300,00 $27,300.00 $33,500.00 $33,500.00 $28,600.00 $28,600.00 $29,700.00 $28,7110.00 $20,000.00 $20,000,00 840 FOOT $0.20 $168.00 = $0.16 $134.40 $0.18 $151.20 $5.16 $4,334.40 $0.20 $168.00 $1.43 $1,201.20 500 FOOT $1.35 $675,{30: $1.25 $625.00 $1.20 $600-00 $1.15 $575.00 $1.35 $875.00. $2.12 $1,060,00 189 SQ FT $12,00 $2,268.00 $6.25 $1,559.25 $12.85 $2,428,65 $12.60 $2,381.40 • $9.05 $1,710.45 $1010 $1,908.90 419 FOOT 1 $8:00 $3,352.00 $6,95 $2,912.05 1 $7.00 1 $2,933.001 $6.85 $2,870.15 $7.60 $3,184.40 $8.55 $3,582.45 35 FOOT $10.00 $350.001 94.95 $173.25 $525 $183.75 $4.85 $173.251 $3.75 $131-251 $3.60 $126.00 26 EACH _ $75.00 $1,950.00_ $56.25 $1,462.50 $63.00 $1,638.00 $56.22 $1,48172` $120.00 $3,120.00 $115.55 $3,004.30 4784 FOOT $5.00 $23,820.00 $2.70 $12,862.80 $3.78 $18,007.92 $2.89 $12,815.16 $2.50 $11,810.00 $2.32 $11,052,48 91 LIGHT POLE, ALUMINUM, 30 FT M.H., 10 FT MAST ARM 92 RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHTING UNIT 93 LUMINAIRE, SODIUM VAPOR, HORIZONTAL MOUNT, 150 WATT 5 EACH 1 $170.00 $850.00 $145.00 $725,00 1 $9.70 25 EACH $32500 $8,125,00;, $23000 $5,750.00 - $21320 21 EACH 1 $1,500,00 $31,501.3.003 $1.12000 $23,520001 $1,114=35 5 EACH $500.00 $2,500.00 ly $430.00 $2,150.00 $533.00 21 EACH $300,00 $6,300.03 ( $200,00 $4,2003.00 $338.15 $6,576.00 1 $1.71 $7,028.10 $2.30 $9,453.00 $2.06 $8,488,60 $4,223.75- $5.57 $3,035,65 $6,35 $3,480.75 $6.13 $3,340.65 $4,850.00 $11.29 $5,645.00 $12.75 $6,375M $12.30 $6,150-00 $7,267-50 $7,863.28 $7,863.28 $7,120.00 $7,120.00 $6,650.00 $6,860.00 $159.90 $150-00 $150.00 $715.00 $715,00 $687.00 $687.00 $1,000=00 $571.50 $571.50 $1,00000 $1,000,00 $1,0003.00 $1,000.00 $13,32500 $75,66 $18,915.00 $79.20 $19,800.00 $76,30 $19,075,00 $48.50 $141, 06 $705,30 . $16500 $825.00 $135.00 $675.00 $5,330.130 $229.89 $5,747.25 $280.00 $7,000.001 $269,00 $6,725,00 $23,401351 $1,120.15 $23,523.151 $1,120,00 $23,520.00 $1,1180.013 $22,680.00 $2,685,00 $427-27 $2,138.35 $290.00 $1,450,00 $281.00 $1,405.00 $7,122.151 $197.33 $4,14193 $400,00 $8,400.00 $386.00 $81108,110 Linneman Road - Bid Tabulation Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Bid Opening Date: January 31, 1995 Item Items No. 94 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LETTERS AND SYMBOLS 95 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 4' 96 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 6' 97 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 12' 98 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 24' 99 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR PATCHING POTHOLES (HOT MIX) 100 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR PATCHING POTHOLES (COLLI MIX) 101 ©UST CONTROL WATERING 102 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL 103 TEMPORARY FENCING 104 TREE TRUNK PROTECTION 105 SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION 106 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION 107 GUARDRAIL REMOVAL Total Bid As Road: Total Bid As Corrected: Sheet 4 of 4 for Contractors 1 - 5 1 2 3 4 5 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ALLIED ASPHALT1PLOTE ARROW ROAD ROSSI CONTRACTORS HARDIN PAVING 1 ABBEY PAVING JOINT VENTURE CONSTRUCTION AND SEALCOATING _ _ antity, Unit Unit Total unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total � Unl# Total Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Rice Amounts Price Amounts 220 SQ FT $2.50 $550.00 $2-50 $550.00 $2.55 $561.00 $3,00 $660-00 $2.50 $550.00 $2.39 $525,80 I 1840 FOOT $0,40 $656.00, $0.40 $656.00 $0.41 $87240 $0.44 $721.80 $0.55 $902.00 $0.52 $852.80 1030 FOOT $0.85 $869 501 $0.50 $616,00 $0.,61 $628.30 $0,67 $890.10 ` $0.70 $721.00 $0.72 $741.60 126 FOOT $1.20 $151.201 $1.30 $183,80= $1,33 $167.58 $1.50 $188.00 $1.45 $182.70 $1.44 $181.44 I 155 FOOT $2.40 $372.00 $2,00 $310.00 $2,05 $317.75 $3.00 $485.00 $2.80 $403.00 $2.57 $398.35 15 TON $60.00 $900.00 $50.00 $750.00 $75.00 $1,125.00 $80,00 $1,200.00 $22.00 $330.00 j $100.00 $1,500.00 15 TON $60.00 $900.00 $50,00 $750.001 $75.00 $1,125.00 $80.00 $1,200.00 $33.00 $495.00 1 $150.00 $2,250,00 75 UNIT 915.00 $1,125,001 $40.00 $3,000.00 $1.00 $75,00 $80.00 $4,500.00 $10.00 $750,00 $8.00 $600.00 1 200 FOOT $2-00 $400.00 $0.50 $100.00 ( $0.75 $150.001 $0.70 $140.00'' $0.55 $110.00 $4.25 $850.00 € 1140 FOOT $3.00 $3,420.00. $2.75 $3,135.00 $3.05 $3,477.00: $2.00 $2,280.00 $1.10 $1,254.00 $5.15 $5,871.00 40 EACH $175.00 $7,000.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 $68.30 $2,652.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 $55.00 $2,200,00 $65.00 $2,600.00 53 FOOT $25.00 $1,325.00 $45.00 $2,385.00 $38.75 $2,053.75 $26.,00 $1,378.001 $65.00 $3,445.00 $29.68 $1,573.04 49 FOOT $45.00 $2,205.00 $30.00 $1,470,00 $19.111 $835.90: $28,00 $1,274.00 $85.00 $3,185,00 $21.72 $1,084.28 I 65 FOOT $10.00 $650.0011 $6.00 $390,00 $10.20 $863.00 $4.00 $260.001 $11.00 $715.00 $3.30 $214.50 $1,304,423.251 $1,148,85R02 ' $1,164,610.44 1 $1,174,360491 $1,210,301.00 $1,214,456.72 1 $1,304,423.25s $1,148,859.021 $1,164,810.44 $1,174,360-49 $1,210,283.00 $1,214,088.22 Linneman Road - Bid Tabulation Shoot Sheet 1 of 4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT r forContractors 6 - 10 Bid Opening Date: January 31, 1995 is 7 8 9 10 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE R.W. DUNTEMAN LENNY HOFFMAN K -FIVE CONSTRUCTION Di PAOLO MARTAM EXCAVATING CONSTRUCTION Item items Quantity Unit unit Total Unit Total unit TotalUnit Total unit Tot ail unit Total No. Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Pries Amounts Price Amounts I TREE REMOVAL (6 TO 20 INCH DIAMETER) 58 IN DIA $15,00 $870,001 $25.00 $1,450.00' $16Z0 $957.00 $20,00 $1,160.00 $19.00 $1,102,00 a $58.00 $3,364.00 2 TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED 9 EACH $350.00 $3,150.00 $300,00 $2,700,00 $150,00 $1,350,00 ¢ $250,00 $2,250.00 $300.00 $2,700.00 $2100.00 $2,700,00 3 EARTH EXCAVATION 5464 CU YD $10.00 $54,640,00 $20.04 $109,498,56 E $16,70 $91,248.80, $15.00 $81,960.00 $12.60 $89,939.20 $13.50 $73,764.00 4 EMBANKMENT 1093 CU YD 1 $8.00 $8,744.00 $0.10 $10930 'E $8.70 $9,509101 $10.00 $110,930,00 $8.00 $8,744.00 $6.00 $6,558.00 5 POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT, SUBGRADE 700 CU YD $22.00 $15,400.001 $20.85 $14,595.0 $29.10 $20,370,00 $28.00 $19,600.00 $26.00 $18,200,00 $20.00 $14,000.00 6 TRENCH BACKFILL 2195 CU YD $22.00 $48,280.00 $24.50 $53,777,50 $20,00 $43,90040 $21,00 $46,095.00: $21.00 $46,095,001 $24.00 $52,680.00 7 SUB SUB -BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE 6 4' 17233 SO YD $300 - $5169900 , . . $217 $3739561 , . $350 $6031550 $400 $6893200 $3.20 $55,145.60 $2.90 $49,975.70 , , . . , . 8 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 4' 196 SO YD $3.00 $588001 $5.61 $11,09956 $3E65 $715.40 $2.50 $490.00 $4.00 $784.00 $4.00 $784.00 9 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 8' 958 SO YD $5.00 $4,790.00 $10.81 $10,355,98' $6.80 $6,514,40 $14.00 $13,412.001 $6.80 $6,514.40 $7.00 $6,706-00 10 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 12' 657 SO YD $6.00 $5,256.00 $16.20 $10,643.40 $10.05 $6,602-85 $18.00 $11,826.00 $10.20 $6,701.40 MOO $5,913.00 11 TOPSOIL PLACEMENT 4" 11582 SO YD $1.25 $14,477.50 $1.05 $12,161.10 $1.35 E $15,635-70: E $1.50 $17,373.00 $1.50 $17,373.00 1 $1,50 $17,373,00 12 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, 8' 619 SO YD $11,00 $6,809-001 $19.60 $12,132,40 $13.00 $8,047.00 $22.00 $13,618.,00 $13.50 $8,356.50 $14,00 $8,686m 13 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE 8' 15734 SO YO $13.00 $204,542.00 $12.17 $191,482,78 $10.70 $166,353,80 $13.00 $204,542.00 $10.60 $166,780,40 $13,80 $217,129.20 14 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 8 1375 TON $8.00 $11,000.00 $15.00 $20,625.00 $15.75 $21,656,25 $8.00 $8,250.00 $15.00 $20,625.00 $12,00 $16'500.00 15 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT) 14 TON $200.00 $2,800.00 $1.00 $14,00 $25.00 $350.00 $156.00 $2,184.00 $295,00 $4,130.00 $260.00 $3,640,001 16 AGGREGATE (PRIME COAT) 34 TON 1 $7.00 $238,00 $1.00 $34.00 $55.00 $1,870.00 $5.00 $170,00 $60.00 $2,040.00. $20.00 $880.00 17 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE, MIXTURE B, TYPE 2 1487 TON $28.00 $41.076.001 $28,10 $41,222.70 $2648 $38,846.161 $27.00 $39,609,00 $27.70 $40,635.90 $34,00 $49,878.00 18 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, CLASS 1, 1587 TON $30,00 $47,610.00- $33.11 $52,545.57 $32z68 $51,663,16' $35.00 $55.545= $34�30 $54,434,10 $3600 $57j3240 TYPE 2 19 PROTECTIVE COAT 3873 SO YD I $0.60 $2,323.801 $0.75 $2,904.75 $0.60 $2,323.80 $1.00 $3,873.00 $1.00 $3,873.00, $050 $1,936.50 20 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 1, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 781 FOOT $23,00 $17,963.00 E $17.50 $13,667,50 $24A0 $18,622,10 $17.30 $13,511.30 $30.30 $23,664,301 $2800 $20,306.00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS IV 12' 21 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 1, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 125 FOOT $25.00 $3,125.00 $19.60 $2,450,00- $26.15 $3,268.75. $21.10 $2,837.50 $35.00 $4,375.00 $29,00 $3,625.00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS IV 15' 22 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 861 FOOT $22.00 $19,382.00 $17.50 $15,417.50 $24.10 $21,232.10 $17.30 $15,241.30 $32.20 $28,368.20 $24.00 $21,144.00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS Ill 12' E E 23 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 956 FOOT $24.00 $22,944,00 $19,60 $18,737-60 $26.15 $24,999.40, $21,10 $20,171'60 E $37,00 $35,372,00 $27,00 $25,812,00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 15' 24 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 297 FOOT $28.00 E $8,316,00 E E E E E $23-25 $6,905.251 p !930-00 $6,910.00 $23,30 $6,920.10 $33.60 $9,979.20 $31.00 $9,207,001 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 18- 25 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 948 FOOT $3200 $30,336-00 $27.00 $25,596,00 $41,,10 $36,962,80 $29,90 $28,345.20 $42,70 $40,479.60 $3740 $35,07600 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 24' 26 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 27 FOOT j $38,00 $1,026,00 $42,25 $1,140,751 $4970 $1,341 90 $40.70 $1,098901 $158.00 $4,266,00 E $60-00 $1,620.00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 30' 26A STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 336 FOOT $50.00 $16,800 00 $5075 $17,052.00 1 $5&00 $19,488,001 $55.00 $18,480M $57.00 $19,152-00 $58.00 $19,488,00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 36' Linneman Road - Bid Tabulation Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Bid Opening Date: January 31, 1995 Item Items No. 27 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, STORM DRAIN AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 48- 28 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1, 12- 29 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1, 15- 30 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 2, 18' 31 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 2, 24- 32 STORM SEWERS, DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52,12- 33 STORM SEWERS, DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52, 15- 34 STORM SEWER REMOVAL S' 35 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 10, 36 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 12* 37 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 15, 30 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 182 39 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 211 40 CATCH BASINS, TYPE A, 4' -DIA., TYPE I FRAME, OPEN LID 41 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 4' -DIA., TYPE I FRAME, CLOSED LID 42 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 5' -DIA., TYPE I FRAME, CLOSED LID 43 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 6' -DIA., TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID 44 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 8' -DIA., TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID RESTRICTOR PLATE 45 SANITARY MANHOLE FRAME AND LID REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT 46 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE BOXES TO BE ADJUSTED 47 INLETS, TYPE A, TYPE I FRAME, OPEN LID 48 CATCH BASINS TO BE REMOVED 49 MANHOLES TO BE REMOVED 50 INLETS TO BE REMOVED 51 MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED 52 WATER VALVES TO BE ADJUSTED 53 CATCH BASINS TO BE FILLED 54 MANHOLES TO BE FILLED 55 INLETS TO BE FILLED 56 CONCRETE CURB, TYPE B 57 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE 8-6-12 58 PAVEMENT REMOVAL 59 DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVAL Sheet 2 of 4 for Contractors 6 - 10 I EACH $2,300.00 $2,300.00 $3,625.00 $3,625,00- $1,710.50 $1,710.501 $5,700,00 $5,700.00 $2,800,00 $2,600.00 !1 1' $5,325.00 $5,325.00 1 11 EACH � $500-00 $5,500,0011 $230.00 $2,530,001 $295z00 $3,245.00 1 $533.50 $5,868.501 $335.00 $3,885.001 $350.00 $3,850.00 11 EACH 31 EACH 4 EACH 5 EACH 8 EACH 3 EACH 8 EACH 7 EACH 7 EACH I EACH 412 FOOT 8667 FOOT 15405 SO YD 3106 SO YD 9100.00 $1,100.00, 1 $90.00 6 $600.00 7 $176.00 8 $75.00 9 $75.00 10 $500.00 $15,500,001 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE E E R.W. DUNTEMAN E LENNY HOFFMAN K -FIVE CONSTRUCTION DI PAOLO MARTAM $20,305.00 $560.00 $17,360.00 $200.00 $800.001 E EXCAVATING $480M $270,00 $1,060.00 $110.00 CONSTRUCTION $1195.00 Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Toted unit Total Unit Total Unit Total $200,00 Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts 274 FOOT $85.00 $23,290.00 $75.50 $20,687.001 $86.25 $23,632.50 1 $94.10 $25,783.40 $106.00 $29,044.00 $86-00 $23,584,00 153 FOOT $25,00 $3,825.00 $18.25 $2,792.25 $25.15 $3,847.95 $21.50 $3,289.50 $32,00 $4,896.00 $26,00 $3,978.00 15 FOOT $28,00 $420.00 1 420,25 $303.75 $27.25 $408.75 $23.70 $355,50 $38,00 $570.00 $28,00 $420.00 20 FOOT $30.00 $600,00 $24,00 $480,00 $30.40 $608.00 $30.30 $606.00 $35.00 $700.00 $36,00 $720.00 20 FOOT $35.00 $700,00 $27.95 $559,00 $41.70 $834.001 $41.30 $828.00 $46.00 $920.00 1 $45.00 $900.00 70 FOOT$30.00 $4,00876 $2,100.00 $30.15 $2,110.50 $38.00 $2,660,00 $35,80 $2,506.00 $46.00 $3,220,00 $35.00 $2,450.00 129 FOOT $35.00 $4,515.00 $39.75 $5.127.75 $44.00 $5,676.00 $41.50 $5,353.50 $63.00 $8,127.00 g $42.00 $5,410.00 70 FOOT $10.00 $700.001 $2.25 $157.50 $12.30 $861,00 $11.00 $770.00 $5,00 $350,00 $10.00 $700.00 40 FOOT $10,00 $400,00 $2.25 $90.00 $9m $392.00 $11.00 $440.00 $5.00 $200.00 $10.00 $400.00 110 FOOT $10.00 $1,100MI $2,25 $247.50 $10,05 $1,105.50 $11.00 $1,210,00 $6.00 $660.00 $10.00 $1,100.00 310 FOOT $10.00 $3,100.00 $2,25 $697.50 $9.30 $2,883.00 $11.00 $3,410.00 $7.00 $2,170.00 $10.00 $3,100.00 30 FOOT $10.00 $300.00 $2.95 $88.50 $11.75 $352.50 $16.50 $495.00 $6.00 $240.00 $15.00 $450.00 30 FOOT $10.00 $300.00 $2.95 $88,501 i $11.75 $352.50 $16.50 $495.00 $10.00 $300.00 $20.00 $600.00 42 EACH$1,200.00 $50,•!00.00 $1,175,00 $49,350001 $1,285.00 $53,970.00 $1,347.50 $56,595.00 $1,340,00 $56,280,00 $1,250.00 $52,500.00 E 4 EACH E $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $1,225.00 $4,900.001 $1,255.00 E $5,020.00 $1,347.50 $5,390.001 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 11 EACH$ 0000 58 00 0 $16,500.00 $1,775,00 E E $19,525.00I $152500 $16,775.00 $1,822.50 $17,847.50 $1,700.00 $18,700.00 $1,500.00 $16,500.00 5 EACH $ 11 0 $9=0.00 $3,000.00 $15,000,001 $2,555.00 $12,775,00 $1,650.00 $8,250.001 $3,000.00 $15,000,00. $2,200.00 $11,000'00 I EACH $2,300.00 $2,300.00 $3,625.00 $3,625,00- $1,710.50 $1,710.501 $5,700,00 $5,700.00 $2,800,00 $2,600.00 !1 1' $5,325.00 $5,325.00 1 11 EACH � $500-00 $5,500,0011 $230.00 $2,530,001 $295z00 $3,245.00 1 $533.50 $5,868.501 $335.00 $3,885.001 $350.00 $3,850.00 11 EACH 31 EACH 4 EACH 5 EACH 8 EACH 3 EACH 8 EACH 7 EACH 7 EACH I EACH 412 FOOT 8667 FOOT 15405 SO YD 3106 SO YD 9100.00 $1,100.00, 1 $90.00 $990.00 $600.00 $8,800.00 $176.00 $1,936,00 $75.00 $825.00 $75.00 $625.00 $500.00 $15,500,001 $615.00 $19,065.00 $605.00 $18,755.00 $715.00 $22,165.00 $655.00 $20,305.00 $560.00 $17,360.00 $200.00 $800.001 E $120.00 $480M $270,00 $1,060.00 $110.00 $440.00 $1195.00 $780.00 $250,00 $1,000.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $310,00 $1,550,00 $270.00 $1,35000' $165.00 $825.00. $175.00 $875,00 E $200,00 $1,000.00 $150.00 $1,200.00 $20,00 $160,00 $175.00 $1.400.001 $55.00 $440.00' $150.00 $1,200.001 $150.00 $1,200-00 $250-00 $750.001 $225,00 $675.00 $250.00 $750.00 $176.00 $528.00 $220.00 $660.00 $500,00 $1,500,00 $250= $2,000,001 $22500 $1,800.00 $100.00 $800M $176.00 $1,408M $220.00 $1,760.00, $200.00 $1,800.00$17500 $1,225.00 $125,00 $875-00 $100,00 $700.00 $82.50 $577-50 $160,00 $1,12{7.00 $200,00 $1,400.00 $200M $1,400MI! $125.00 $875M $10000 $70000 E $82.50 $577.50 $160.00 $1,120,00' $200.00 $1,400.00 $100.00 $100.001 $75,00 $75.00 $100.00 E E $10000 $27.50 $27.50 $75,00 $75-00 $100.00 $10000 $10,00 $4,120,00' $973 $4,00876 $13,70 $5,644,401 $10-00 $4,120-00, $13,80 $5,885,60 $11,00 $4,532.00 $11.00 $95,337,00 $8.98 $77,829.661 $10-00 $86,670.00 $9.35 $81,036.45 $8-90 $77,138.30 $9-50 $82,336,50 $5.50 $84,727.50 $3,81 $58,693,05 $6.00 $92,430.00 $500 $77,02500 $5-00 $77,025.00 $6,00 $92,430,00 $4.50 $13,977 $4.90 405,219,407 $3,80 $11,802.80 $8,00 $24,848 00 $5.00 $15,530.00, $6.00 $18,636,00 Linneman Road - Bid Tabulation Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BU Opening Date: January 31, 1995 Item items No. 60 CLASS D PATCHES, TYPE III 61 BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVAL (COLD MILLING) 1 1/2' 62 COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL 63 SIDEWALK REMOVAL 64 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, 9 INCH 85 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 51NCH 66 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 81NCH 67 FIRE HYDRANTS TO BE MOVED 68 SODDING 69 SUPPLEMENTAL WATERING 70 NITROGEN FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 71 PHOSPHOROUS FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 72 POTASSIUM FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 73 ENGINEER'S FIELD OFFICE, TYPE 8 74 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION 75 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING 76 PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE, TYPE III 4- 77 SIGN PANEL - TYPE 1 78 TELESCOPING STEEL SIGNPOST 79 ELECTRIC CABLE IN CONDUIT, 600V (EPR - TYPE USE) 3-1/C NO, 110 80 GROUND ROD, 5/8' DIA.X 10 FT. 81 UNIT DUCT, 3-1/C NO.B AND 1/C NO,8 GROUND, 600V (EPR - TYPE RHW), 1' DIAMETER POLYETHYLENE 82 TRENCH AND BACKFILL FOR ROADWAY LIGHTING 83 CONDUIT IN TRENCH, 2` DIA., GALVANIZED STEEL 84 CONDUIT PUSHED, 2' DIA., GALVANIZED STEEL 85 LIGHTING CONTROLLER, PEDESTAL MOUNT 86 ELECTRIC SERVICE INSTALLATION 67 ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION 88 LIGHTPOLE FOUNDATION, 24' DIAMETER 89 REMOVE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION, PARTIAL 90 BREAKAWAY DEVICE, COUPLING, WITH ALUMINUM SKIRT 91 LIGHT POLE, ALUMINUM, 30 FT. M.H-, 10 FT MAST ARM 92 RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHTING UNIT 93 LUMINAIRE, SODIUM VAPOR, HORIZONTAL MOUNT, 150 WATT Sheet 3 of 4 for Contractors 6 - 10 1 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.001 $571.50 $571.50 $848.00 $648,00 $712,80 $712,801 $600.00 $600.00 i $600.00 $600.00 1 L. SUM $1,000.00 $1,000.00. $1,200.00 $1,200.00 = $1,000,00 $1,000,001 $1,265._00 $1,265=00 c $1,565=00 $1,565.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 250 FOOT $100,00 $25,000.00 , $75.66 $18,915.00 $72.00 $18,000-00 $79.20 $19,800.00 $79,40 $19,05000 $70.00 $17,500.00 5 EACH e $170.00 $650,00 $141.05 $705.25 $150,00 $750-00 $16500 $825.00 $148.00 $740,00 $15000 $750,00 I 25 EACH $325.00 $8,125.00 $229,89 $5,74725 $254,00 $6,350.00 $280;40 $7,010,001 $241.00 $6,025,00 $250.00 $6,250.00 21 EACH $1,500.00 $31,500001 $1,120.15 $23,52315 $1,018.00 $21,37800 $1,119.80 $23,51580: $1,178.00 $124,896.00- $1,200,00 $25,200.00 5 EACH $500,00 $2,500,00= $427.27 $2,138-35 $262.00 $1,310,00 $288.20 $1,441.00 $448,00 $2,240.00 $500.00 $2,500.00 21 EACH 11 $300,00 $16,300-00� $197.33 $4,143,93' $384,00 $7,644.00 $40040 $8,408401 $208.50 $4,336.50 � $210,00 $4,410.00 6 7 E 8 9 10 � ENGWEERS ESTIMATE � R.W. DUNTEMAN LENNY HOFFMAN I K -FIVE CONSTRUCTION DI PAOLO MARTAM I EXCAVATING ( CONSTRUCTION uantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total I Unit Tota Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amourds Price Amounts Prue Amounts 43 SO YD $40-00 $1,720,00 = $6000 $2,5801<001 $35.00 $1,50&00 $801 00 $3,440.00 $68.50 $2,945.50' $50.00 $2,150 00 945 SO YD $2,00 $1,89000: $6F35 m $6,000,751 $2,80 $2,646,00 $5.00 $4,725.00 $3.00 $2,835,00 $3.00 $2,835,00 2351 FOOT $3.00 $7,05100 $1.20 $2,821.20 $2.50 $5,877.50 $5.00 $11,755.00 $2.50 $5,877.50 $4.00 $9,404.00 1077 SO FT $1.00 $1,077,00 1 $0.80 $861.601 $0.85 $915,45 $0.75 $807.75 $0.80 $881.60 $1.00 $1,077.00 196 SO YD ( $24.00 $4,704.00: $22.40 $4,390.40 $36.65 $7,183.40 $21.00 $4,116.00 $37,80 $7,369.60 $30.00 $5,880.00 11789 SQ FT $3.00 $135,367_{}0 E $2.55 $30,061.95 $2.85 $33,596.85 $2.25 $26,525.25 $3.00 $35,387.00 $3.00 $35,367.00 3555 SO FT $3.25 $11,553.75 x;3.11 $11,056.05 � $3,25 $11,553.75 2-50 $8,887.50 $3.20 $11,376,00 $3-20 $11,378.00 4 EACH $1,20000 $4,600.001 $1,625,00 $6,500.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $150.00 $600.00 $1,400.00 $5,600.00 $800.00 $3,600.00 11582 SO YD $3,00 $34,746,00 $2.15 $24,901.30 $2.80 $30,113.20 $2,25 $26,059.50 t $2.20 $25,480.40 $2.40 $27,796.80 139 UNIT $10,00 $1,390.0011 II $5,00 $895,00 $3.00 $417.00 $0.01 $1.38 $1.00 $139.00 $10.00 $1,390.00 222 POUND $1.00 $222.001 $1.00 $222.00 $1.00 $222.00 $1.50 $333.00 $1.70 $377.40 $1.00 $222.00 133 POUND $1.00 $133,001 $1.00 $133-00 $1.00 $133.00 i $1.50 $199.50 $1.70 $226.10 $1.00 $133.011 89 POUND $1.00 $89,00 $1.00 $89.00 $1.00 $89.00 i $1.511 $133.511 $1.70 $151.30 $1.00 $89,00 9 CAL MO $800.00 $7,200.00 $1,000.00 $9,00000' $1,000.00 $9,000.001 $1,100.00 $9,900.00 $700.00 $6,300,00 $800,00 $7,200,00 1 L. SUM 19$36,000.00 $36,000.00=$35,000.00 $35,000.00"$41,750.00 $41,750.00 $44,600.00 $44,600.00 $53,900.00 $53,800,00 $40,000.00 $40,1100.00 840 FOOT $0.20 $168.001 $0,80 $672,00 $0,20 $168-00 $0.20 $168.00 $0.30 $252.00 $0.40 $336,00 500 FOOT E$1.35 $675.00 $1,75 $875.00 $1.45 $725,00 $1,25 $625.00 $1.30 $650.00 $1.50 $750.00 189 SO FT .v $12.00 $2,268.00 $9.50 $1,755,50 $12,60 $2,381.40 $1125 91,559.25 $12.50 $2,362.511 $15.00 $2,835.00 419 FOOT $8.00 $3,35200 $8.00 I $3,352.00 $8.85 $2,870.15 $6,95 $2,912.05 $8,50 $3,561.50 $8.00 $3,352.00 ' 35 FOOT � $10.00 $350.00 $4.95 $173.25 ( $3.40 $119.00 $3.70 $129.50 $5.15 $180.25 $5.00 $175,00 26 EACH $75:00 $1,950.00 $58,22 $1,461.72 $109.00 $2,8313 .00 $119,90 $3,117,40. $59.00 $1,534-00 $60,00 $1,580.00 4764 FOOT $5.00 $23,820.00 � $2.69 $12,815.16 $2.25 $10,719.00 1 - - $2.50 $11,910,00 $2,80 613,339,20 $2,90 $13,815.60 4110 FOOT $2.25 $9,247.50 $1.71 $7,028.10 1 $2;10 $8,631.00 $2.30 $9,453.00 $1.80 $7,398.00 $2.00 $8,220.00 545 FOOT i $11.50 $6,267,50 $5.57 $3,035.65 $5.78 $3,150.10 $6.40 $3,488.00 $5.85 $3,168.25 ' $6.00 $3,270,00 500 FOOT $15.00 $7,500.00 E $11.29 $5,645,00 $11,61 $5,805,00 $12.80 $6,400,00 $11.90 $5,950.00 $12.00 $8,000,00 Ej 1 EACH $7,000,00 $7,000.00 $7,863.28 $7,663.26 $6,470M $6,470.00 $7,117,00 $7,117.00 $8,032.60 $8,032.60 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 1 EACH $1,000.00 $1,000.001 $571.50 $571.50 $848.00 $648,00 $712,80 $712,801 $600.00 $600.00 i $600.00 $600.00 1 L. SUM $1,000.00 $1,000.00. $1,200.00 $1,200.00 = $1,000,00 $1,000,001 $1,265._00 $1,265=00 c $1,565=00 $1,565.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 250 FOOT $100,00 $25,000.00 , $75.66 $18,915.00 $72.00 $18,000-00 $79.20 $19,800.00 $79,40 $19,05000 $70.00 $17,500.00 5 EACH e $170.00 $650,00 $141.05 $705.25 $150,00 $750-00 $16500 $825.00 $148.00 $740,00 $15000 $750,00 I 25 EACH $325.00 $8,125.00 $229,89 $5,74725 $254,00 $6,350.00 $280;40 $7,010,001 $241.00 $6,025,00 $250.00 $6,250.00 21 EACH $1,500.00 $31,500001 $1,120.15 $23,52315 $1,018.00 $21,37800 $1,119.80 $23,51580: $1,178.00 $124,896.00- $1,200,00 $25,200.00 5 EACH $500,00 $2,500,00= $427.27 $2,138-35 $262.00 $1,310,00 $288.20 $1,441.00 $448,00 $2,240.00 $500.00 $2,500.00 21 EACH 11 $300,00 $16,300-00� $197.33 $4,143,93' $384,00 $7,644.00 $40040 $8,408401 $208.50 $4,336.50 � $210,00 $4,410.00 Linnem an Road - Bid Tabulation Sheet Sheet 4 of 4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT for Contractors 6 - 10 Bid Opening Date. January 31, 1995 6 7 8 9 10 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE A,W. DUNTEMAN LENNY HOFFMAN K -FIVE CONSTRUCTION DI PAOLO MARTAM EXCAVATING I CONSTRUCTION Item Items Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts 94 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LETTERS AND 220 SQ FT $2.50 $550.00 $2.25 $495.00 $3.00 $660.00 $2.25 $495.00 $2.80 $816.00 $4,00 $880.00 SYMBOLS 95 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 4' 1840 FOOT $0-40 $656.001 $0,50 $820.00 $0.44 $721.60, $0.50 $820.00 $0.70 $1,148.00 $0.80 $984.00 96 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING -LINE 6' 1030 FOOT $0.65 $889,.50 � $0.60 $618.00'! $0.67 $690.10 $0.60 $618,00 $1.00 $1,030.00 $0.75 $772.50 97 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING -LINE 12' 126 FOOT $1.20 $151.20$1.10 $138.60 $1.50 $189.00 $1.10 $138.60 $Z00 $252.00 $1.75 $220.50 98 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING -LINE 24' 155 FOOT 1 i $2.40 $372.00 ` $2.00 $310.00 $3.00 $465.00 $2,00 $310.00 $4.00 $620.00 $4.00 $620.00 99 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR PATCHING POTHOLES (HOT MIX) 15 TON $60.00 $900,00. $50,00 $750.00 $55.00 $825.00 $75,00 $1,125.00 $70.00 $1,050.00 $70.00 $1,05000 1(}0 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR PATCHING POTHOLES (COLD MIX) 15 TON g $60,00- $50.00 $750.00 $60.00 $9110.00 $75.00 $1,125.00. $90.00 $1,350.00 $80.00 $1,200.00 101 DUST CONTROL WATERING 75 UNIT $15.00 $1,125.001 $50.00 $3,750-00 $50.00 $3,750.00 e $50.00 $3,750.00$20.00 $1,500.00 $70.00 $5,250.00 102 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL 200 FOOT $2.00 $400.00 ` $1,00 $200.00 $0.70 $140.00 $0.50 $100.00 $0.50 $100.00 $1.00 $200.00 103 TEMPORARY FENCING 1140 FOOT $3,00 $3,420.00 ' $3,00 $3,420.00 $1.70 $1,938,00. $2.75 $3,135.00 $3.00 $3,420.00 $3,00 $3,420,00 104 TREE TRUNK PROTECTION 40 EACH $175,00 $7,000.00 $65.00 $2,600.00 l $50.00 $2,000.00 $60.00 $2,400.00 $160.00 $6,400.00 � $25.00 $1,000.00 105 SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION 53 FOOT $25.00 $1,325-00 $38.00 $2,014,00 ' $45.00 $2,38500 $75.00 $3,975.00 $25.00 $1,325.00 �� $22.00 $1,166.00 106 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION 49 FOOT $45.00 $2,205-00 $18.70 $916.30 $50.00 $2,450.00 $75.00 $3,875,00 $33.00 $1,617.00 $25.00 $1,225.00 107 GUARDRAIL REMOVAL 65 FOOT $10.00 $650,00' $8.00 $520,00 $15.00 $975.00 $6,00 $390.00 $7.00 $455.00 $2.00 $130.00 Total Bid As Read: $1,304,423,25 1,304,4ry3,25 a€� 1,241,342=67 $1,241,342 67 $q ,325,505,17 1,339,377.44 $1,339,377.44 $1,345,678.90 � $1,357,894.30 Total t31d AS Corrected $1,304,423.25.$1,241,342-67 �l ++} $1,325,505.17 �a +� ww $1,339,377.44 .yam t± p $1,345,$78.90 t $1,360,388.30 Linneman Road - Bid Tabulation Shut Sheet 1 of VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT for Contractors 11 - 14 Sid Opening Date. January 31, 1995 11 12 13 14 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ALLIANCE A& K CONSTRUCTION ACCU-PAVING JOHNSON PAVING CONTRACTORS item Items Quardity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Urot Total No. Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts 1 TREE REMOVAL (6 TO 20 INCH DIAMETER) 58 IN DIA $15.00 $870,00 = $12.00 $696.00 $19.35 $1,122.30 $25.00 $1,450.00,$22.00 $1,276.00 2 TREES TO BE TRANSPLANTED 9 EACH $350.00 $3,150100 $250.00 $2,250.00 $284.55 $2,560.951 $270.00 $2,430.00 $280.00 $2,520.00 3 EARTH EXCAVATION 5464 CU YD $10,00 $54,640.00€ $1025 $56,006.00 $17.35 $94,800.401 $19,30 $105,455.20 $18,00 $98.352.00 4 EMBANKMENT 1093 CU YD E $6,00 $8,744,00€ $10.25 $11,203,25 $8.83 $7,465,181 $15.90 $17,378,70 $12.00 $13,118.00 5 POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT, SUBGRADE 700 CU YD $27010 $15,400.00 $3005 $21,035.00 $27.73 $19,411001 $18.00 $12,800.00 $20.00 $14,000.00 6 TRENCH BACKFILL 2195 CU YD $22.00 $48,290,00 $22.50 $49,387,501 $26,02 $57,11;3.80: $30.60 $87,806.00 $32.00 $70,240.00 7 SUB -BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE B 4' 17233 SO YD $3.00 $511699,00 $3.95 $58,070.35 $2.73 $47,048.09 � $3.10 $53,422.30 $2.70 $46,529.10 8 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 4'196 SO YD $3.010 $586.00 $2.80 $548.80 $2.73 $535.081 $7,50 $1,470.001 $3.00 $588.00 9 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, S' 958 SO YD $5.00 $4,790.00 $10.45 $10,011.10 1 $10.03 $9,608.74 $5.20 $4,981.60' $5.75 $5,508.50 10 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, 12' 657 SO YD � $8.000 $5,258.00 $12.60 $8,409.60 $10.24 $6,727.88 $6.95 $4,588,15 s $8160 $5,650.20 11 TOP SOIL PLACEMENT 4' 11582 SO YD $1.25 $14,477.50 $1.35 $15,635.701 $1,54 $17,838.28 $1.50 $17,373.00 $1.50 $17,373,00 12 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, (' 619 SO YD $11=00 $6,808.00 $22,80 $14,113,20,$25,95 $06,063.05 $14.75 $8,130.25 $10.00 $6,180.00 13 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE S' 15734 SO YD $13.00 $204,542.00 $10.35 $162,846.90 $11.76 $185,346,52 $10.60 $166,780.40 $12.50 $196,675.00 14 AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 8 1375 TON $8.00 $11,000.00 $12,10 $16,637.50 $12.42 $17,077.50 $8.20 $11,275.00 $15.00 $20,625.00 15 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS {PRIME COAT} 14 TON $200.00 $2,800.00 $1.00 $14.00 $113.82 $1,593.46. $560.00 $7,840.00 $325.00 $4,550.00 16 AGGREGATE PRIME COAT) 34 TON $7.00 $238.00' $1.00 $34.00 $17.07 $580.38 $45.00 $1,530.00 $25.00 $850.00 17 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE MIXTURE B, TYPE 2 1467 TON $28.00 $41,076,00 $26.85 $42,469.65 $32.85 $48,337.85 $28.50 $43,276.50 = $27.25 $39,975.75 18 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, CLASS?, 1587 TON $30.00 $47,610.00 $38.00 $60,306.00, $43.25 $68,637.75 , $33.60 $53,323.20 $31.25 $49,593.75 TYPE 2 19 PROTECTIVE COAT 3873 SO YD $0-80 $2,323.80: $0.85 $3,292,05 $1.02 $3,950.46 $1.00 $3,873.00 $0,75 $2,904.75 20 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 1, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 781 FOOT $23.00 $17,963.00 $38,00 $29,678.00 $27,32 $21,336.92 $18.40 $14,370.A0 $30.50 $23,620,50 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS IV 12- 21 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 1, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 125 FOOT $25.00 $3,125.00 $39.50 $4,937.50 $31.22 $3,802.50 ; $21.60 $2,700.00 $28.80 $3,600.00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS IV 15' 22 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 881 FOOT $22.00 $19,382.00 $38.00 $33,478.001 $28,63 $25,223.031 $18.40 $18,210.40 $30.50 $26,870.50 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 12' 1 23 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 956 FOOT $24.00 $22,944.00 $39.50 $37,762.00 $31.22 $29,846,32 $22,70 $21,701.201 $28.50 $27,246.00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 15' E �l 24 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 297 FOOT $26.00 $8,316.00 $42.50 $12,822,50 $36.42 $10,818.74 $25.40 $7,543.60 $31.20 $9,266.40 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS III 18' 25 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 946 FOOT $32,00 $30,336-001 7,O $44,55600 $45,53 $43,162.44 $37.30 $35,360,40. $40.25 $38,157.00' y r STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 24'I 26 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 27 FOOT $38.00 $1,02600 $56.50 $1,52550 $54.63 $1,475.01 $403.60 $1,312,20 $115.00 $3,105.00 STORM DRAIN, AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 30' 26ASTORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, 336 FOOT $50.00 $16,800.00 $62.50 $21,000.00 x;67,64 $22,727.041 $58.901 $19,790.40 $60.75 $20,412,00 STORM DRAIN, AND .SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 38' Linneman Road - Bid Tabulati©n Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Bid Opening Date: January 31, 1995 Item Items No 27 STORM SEWERS, TYPE 2, REINFORCED CONCRETE CULVERT, STORM DRAIN AND SEWER PIPE, CLASS 111 48- 28 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1, 12- 29 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1, 15' 30 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 2, 18' 31 STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 2, 24' 32 STORM SEWERS, DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52,12- 33 STORM SEWERS, DUCTILE IRON, CLASS 52,15- 34 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 8- 35 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 10' 36 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 121 37 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 15, 38 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 18* 39 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 21, 40 CATCH BASINS, TYPE A, 4' -DIA., TYPE I FRAME, OPEN LID 41 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 4' -DIA., TYPE I FRAME, CLOS® LID 42 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 5' -DIA., TYPE I FRAME, CLOS137 LID 43 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 6' -DIA., TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID 44 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 6' -DIA., TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID RESTRICTOR PLATE 45 SANITARY MANHOLE FRAME AND LID REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT 46 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE BOXES TO BE ADJUSTED 47 INLETS, TYPE A, TYPE 1 FRAME, OPEN LID 48 CATCH BASINS TO BE REMOVED 49 MANHOLES TO BE REMOVED 50 INLETS TO BE REMOVED 51 MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED 52 WATER VALVES TO BE ADJUSTED 53 CATCH BASINS TO BE FILLED 54 MANHOLES TO BE FILLED 55 INLETS TO BE FILLED 56 CONCRETE CURB, TYPE 6 57 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6,12 58 PAVEMENT REMOVAL 59 DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVAL Sheet 2of 4 forContractors 11 - 14 153 FOOT 11 15 FOOT 20 FOOT 11 12 13 14 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ALLIANCE A & K CONSTRUCTION ACCO -PAVING JOHNSON PAVING $4,911-30 $461.25 $755-00 CONTRACTORS $35.00 $700,00 $47.50 Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total UrA Total Unit Total Unit Total Price Amounts Price Amounts i Price Amounts Price Amounts I Price Amounts -- ---------- --I 274 FOOT $85.00 $23,290-00 1 $82.50 $22,605M $94,98 $28,024.52 $86.15 $23,605.10 $138.10 $24,139.40 153 FOOT 11 15 FOOT 20 FOOT $25.00 $28.00 $30.00 $3,825.00 $420.00 $600.00 $39.00 $40.50 $43.50 $5,967.00 $607,50 $870.00 $29,92 $32.53 $37.73 $4,577.761 $487.95 $754.80 $19<50 $22,15 $26.00 $2,983.50 $332.25 $520.00 $32.10 $30.75 $37,75 $4,911-30 $461.25 $755-00 20 FOOT 11 $35.00 $700,00 $47.50 $950,00 $46,84 $936.80 $37,80 $756,00 $44,45 $889.00 70 FOOT $30.00 $2,100.00 $52,00 $3,640.00 $42,93 $3,005,10' $34,00 $2,380.00 $48.10 $3,367.00 129 FOOT $35,00 $4,515.00 $62,00 $7,998,00 = E E $54.63 $7,047.27 $44,30 $5,714.70 $52,90 $6,824.10 70 FOOT $10.00 $700.00 $ Z50 E $175.00 $5,20 $364�00 $975 $662,50 $7 75 $54Z50 40 FOOT $10.00 $400,00 $2.50 E E $100.00 E E E $5,20 $208.00 = $11.00 $440.00 $1.30 $52.00 110 FOOT $10, 00 $1,100 m $3.00 E E E $330.00 E E E E E $6.51 $716.10 $11,00 $1,210.00 $6.60 9726.00 310 FOOT 1 $10.00 $3,100,00 $3.00 E E $930.00 E E E E E $6.51 $2,018,10 $11.80 $3,596.00.. $16.35 $5,068.50 30 FOOT $10.00 $300.00 $5.00 E E $150.00 ' E $6.51 $195.30 $12.50 $375.00 $1.50 $45.00 30 FOOT $10.00 $300.00 $500 $150.00 $7.81 $234.30 $14.60 $438.00 $1,50 $45,00 42 EACH $1,200.00 $50,400.00 $1,588.00 1 $66,698,00 1 $1,300.96 $54,640,32 $1,400.00 $58,800.00 $1,380.00 $57,960.00 4 EACH 11 EACH 5 EACH 1 EACH 11 EACH 11 $500.00 $5,500,0011 $441,00 $4,851,001 $585,03 $6,435.331 $325,00 $3,575.001 $404,00 $4,444.00 11 EACH 31 EACH 4 EACH 5 EACH 8 EACH 3 EACH 8 EACH 7 EACH 7 EACH I EACH 412 FOOT 8667 FOOT 15405 SO YD 3106 SO YD $100.00 $1,100.001 $95,00 $1,045.001 $143.41 $1,577,511 $81.00 $891 $170.00 $1,870,00 $500,00 $15,500.00 $762.00 $23,622,00 $676.50 $20,971.50 $650'00 $20.150,00 $750.00 $23,250.00 $200,00 $800.00 $115.00 $480.00 $208.15 $832.60 $475.00 $1,900m $344,00 $1,376.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 $130.00 $650M $234.18 $1,170,90 $410.00 $2,050.00 $135.00 $575.00 $150.00 $1,200.001 $60.00 $640.00 $65,05 $520.40 $340.00 $2,720.00 $75,00 $600,00 $25000 $750,00 111 $195.00 $585.001 $32524 $975.72 $13500 $405.00 $195.00 $585.00 $250,00 $2,000.001 $220,00 $1,760,00 $325-24 $2,601.92. $135-00 $1,080.00 $195,00 $1,560.00 $175-00 $1,225.00 1 $115,00 $805,001 - $169,13 $11163�91 I $155,00 $1,085,00 $180,00 $1,280.00 $200-00 $1,400,00 1, $100.00 E $700.00 E $169� 13 $1,183.91. $155�00 $1,085,00. $100,00 $700.00 $100,00 $100300 = $80.00 $80,00 $52,04 $52,04,El 9105-00 $105,00-1 $50,00 $5000 $10,00 $4,120M $11,55 $4,758-601 $10.81 $4,453.72 $10m $4,120.001 $11.50 $4,738.00 $11,00 $95,337,00 $810 $70,202,70 $9.11 $78,956.37 $9,35 $81,036,45 $1025 $136,83675 $5.50 $84,72750 $5.o0 $77,025,00 $3,41 $52,531,05 $7,00 $107,83500 $550 $04,727.50 $4-50 $13,977.00 $5,50 $17,083,00 $911 $28,295,66 $330 $10,249.80 $7.00 $21,742.00 L,inneman Read - Sid Tabulation Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Sid Opening Date: January 31, 1995 Item Items No. 60 CLASS D PATCHES, TYPE III 61 BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVAL (COLD MILLING) 1 1/2' 62 COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL 63 SIDEWALK REMOVAL 84 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, 6 INCH 65 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5 INCH 66 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6 INCH 67 FIRE HYDRANTS TO BE MOVED 68 SODDING 6-9 SLIPPLEMEWAL WATE 1NG 70 NITROGEN FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 71 PHOSPHOROUS FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 72 POTASSIUM FERTILIZER NUTRIENT 73 ENGINEER'S FIELD OFFICE, TYPE 8 74 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION 75 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING 76 PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE, TYPE III 4' 77 SIGN PANEL - TYPE 1 78 TELESCOPING STEEL SIGNPOST 79 ELECTRIC CABLE IN CONDUIT, 600V (EPR - TYPE USE) 3-f/C NO, 110 80 GROUND ROD, 5/8' DIA.X 10 FT. 81 UNIT DUCT, 3-1/C NO.6 AND 1/C NO,8 GROUND, 600V (EPR -TYPE RHW), 1- DIAMETER POLYETHYLENE 62 TRENCH AND BACKFILL FOR ROADWAY LIGHTING 83 CONDUIT IN TRENCH, 2' DIA., GALVANIZED STEEL_ 84 CONDUIT PUSHED, 2' DIA., GALVANIZED STEEL 85 LIGHTING CONTROLLER, PEDESTAL MOUNT 86 ELECTRIC SERVICE INSTALLATION 67 ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTION 68 LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION, 24' DIAMETER 89 REMOVE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION, PARTIAL 90 BREAKAWAY DEVICE, COUPLING, WITH ALUMINUM SKIRT 91 LIGHTPOLE, ALUMINUM, 30 FT. M -H,, 1O FT MAST ARM 92 RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHTING UNIT 93 LUMINAIRE, SODIUM VAPOR, HORIZONTAL MOUNT, 150 WATT Sheet Sof 4 for Contractors 11 - 14 11 12 13 14 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ALLIANCE A & K CONSTRUCTION ACCO -PAVING JOHNSON PAVING I` I CONTRACTORS uanfity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit I Total I Unit Total Prue Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts 43 SC]YD E $40.00 $1,720.00 $37.00 $1,591.00 $53,50 $2,300,50 $55.00 $2,365,00 $100.00 $4,300.00 945 SO YD $2.00 $1,890.00; $3.60 $3,402.00 $4,10 $3,874:50 $3.50 $3,307.50 $3,00 $2,835.00 2351 FOOT l $3.00 $7,053-00 $5.00 $11,755.00 $2.28 $5,360,28 $3.25 $7,840.75 $3.00 $7,053.00 l 1077 SOFT $1.00 L_ $1,077,008 $1-25 $1,346,25 ' $2,21 $2,380,17 $0.80 $646.20 $0.75 $807.75 I 196 SO YD $24.00 $4,704-00X $26.70 $5,233.20 $39.84 $7,808.84 $41.05 $8,045.80 $25.00 $4,900.00 11789 SO FT $3.00 $35,367,00 $2.90 $34,188A0 $2.67 $31,476.63 $2.45 $28,883,05 $2.80 $33,009.20 3555 SO FT $3.25 $11,55175„ $3.30 $11,731.50 $2.79 $9,918,45 $2,55 $9,065.25 $3.10 $11,020.50 4 EACH $1,200.00 $4,600.00 $930.00 $3,72000 $2,601.93 $10,407.72 $1,810.00 $7,240.00 $1,650.00 $6,600.00 11562 SO YD $3.00 $34,746.00 $2,00 $23,164.00 $2.28 $26,406.96 $2.20 $25,480.40 $2.25 $26,059.50 139 UNIT _ $10.00 $1,390,001 $1.00 $139.00 $22-76 $3,163.64 $10.00 $1,390.00 $10.00 $1,390.00 222 POUND $1.00 $222.00� $1,50 $33300 $1,71 $379.62 $+2.00 $444.00 $1.80 $399.60 133 POUND $1.00 $133.00� $1.50 $199.50 $1.71 $227.43 $2.00 $266.00 $1.80 $239.40 89 POUND 1 $1.00 $89=00 $1.50 $133.50 $1.71 $152.19 $2.00 $178.00 $1.80 $160.20 9 CAL MO $600.00 $7,200.00$750.00 $6,750.00 $1,365.84 $12,292.56 $1,700.00 $15,300.00 $1,500.00 $13,500.00 1 L. SUM $38,000= $36,000.00 $42,900.00 $42,900.00 $37,560.60 $37,560.80 $93,700.00 $93,700.00 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 840 FOOT $0,20 $168.00 $0.25 $210.00 $0.34 $285.60 $060 $504.00 $0.53 $445.20 500 FOOT l $1.35 $675,00 81.45 $725.00 $1.88 $940.00 $2.00 $1,000.001 $1.50 $750.00 189 SO FT $1200 $2,268.00 $15.00 $2,835.00 $14.34 $2,710.26 $11.55 $2,162.95 $12.60 $2,362.50 419 FOOT $8.00 $31352,00 $6.50 $2,723.50 $7,80 $3,288.20 $8.25 $3,456.75 $8.50 $3,980,50 35 FOOT I $10.00 $350.00 $4.95 $173.25 $3,87 $135.45 $5.35 $187.25 $5,50 $192,50 26 EACH $75.00 $1,950.00 $56.22 $1,461,72 $124.06 $3,225.56 $61.00 $1,588.00: $60.00 $1,560.00 4764 FOOT $5.00 $23,620.00 $2,69 $12,815,16 E $2856 $12,195.84 $2.90 $13,815.6011 $3.00 $14,292.00 4110 FOOT $2.25 $9,247.50 $131 I $7,028.101 $2.39 $9,822.90 $1,85 $7,603,50 $2.00 $8,220;00 545 FOOT $11,50 $6,267,501 $5,57 E $3,035.65 ` $6.56 $3,586.10 $6.05 $3,297,25 $6.00 $3,270.00 500 FOOT $15.00 $7,500-00' $11.29 $5,645.00 $13.21 $6,605.00 $1220 $6,100.00 $12.50 $6,250.00 1 EACH $7,000.00 $7,000.00' $7,863.28 $7,863.28 $7,364.15 $7,364,15 $6,500.00 $8,500.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 1 EACH $1,000,00 $1,000;00 $571;50 $57150 $737,55 $737.55 $620.00 $620.00 $650.00 $650,00 1 L- SUM$1,000.00 $1,000,0{3£, $600.00 $600,00 $1,308-93 $1,30893 $1,000.00 $1,000001 $1,000,00 $1,000,00 250 FOOT $100.00 $25,000,,00 $75.66 $18,915.00 $8195 $20,467,50 $82,00 $20,500.00 $83.00 $20,750.00 5 EACH $170.00 $850,001- $141.05 $705..25 $17073 $853.65 $155.00 $775.00 1 $160.00 $800,00 25 EACH $325,00 $8,125.00 $229.89 $5,747.25 $29013 $7,25325 $250.00 $6,250.00. $350;00 $8,750.00 21 EACH $1,500.00 $31,500-00 $1,120.15 $23,523-15 $1,158.69 $24,33249 $1,210.00 $25,410,00 $1,350300 $28,350.00 5 EACH $500,00 $2,500°00 $42727 $2,136.35 E $298,21 $1,491,05 $465,00 $2,325.001 $475,00 $2,375,00 21 EACH $300-00 $6,300,001 _ $197:33 $4,143.93 € $414.30 $8,700,30 - $215,00 $4,515,001 $225.00 $4,725,00 Linneman Read - Bid Tabulation Sheet VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Ski Opening Date. January 31, 1895 item Items No. 94 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LETTERS AND SYMBOLS 95 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 4' 96 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING -LINE 8' 97 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING -LINE 12' 98 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING -LINE 24' 99 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR PATCHING POTHOLES (HOT MIX) 100 BITUMINOUS MIXTURE FOR PATCHING POTHOLES (COLD MIX) 101 DUST CONTROL WATERING 102 PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL 103 TEMPORARY FENCING 104 TREE TRUNK PROTECTION 105 SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION 106 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION 107 GUARDRAIL REMOVAL Total Bid As Read: Total Bid As Corrected; Sheet 40f 4 for Contractors 11 - 14 11 12 13 14 ENGINEEfi'S ESTIMATE ,3 ALLIANCE A & K CONSTRUCTION ACCU-PAVING JOHNSON PAVING CONTRACTORS antity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total Unit Tatar Unit Total Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts Price Amounts 220 SQ FT $2.50 $550,00 $2.25 $495.00 $2.67 $587.40 $2.45 $539.00 $2.50 $550,00 1840 FOOT $0,40 $656.00 $0.49 $80360 $0.63 $1,033.20 $0.55 $9.02.00 $0.56 $918,40 1030 FOOT $0.65 $66950 $0.61 $628,30 $0,85 $875.50 $0,65 $669.50 $0.88 $679.80 126 FOOT $1.20 $151.20 $1.30 $163,801 $1.42 $178.92 $1.40 $176.40 $1.25 $157,,50 155 FOOT $2.40 $372.00 i $2.35 $364.251 $2.79 $432.45 $2.55 $;385.25 $2.25 $348.75 15 TON $60.00 $900.00 $135,00 $2,025.00 $113.82 $1,707.30 $100.00 $1,500,00'°'++"; $65.00 $975.00 15 TON $60.00 $900.00 $135.00 $2,025,00 $113.82 $1,707.30 $100.00 $1,500.00 $65,00 $975,00 75 UNIT $15.00 $1,125.00 $12.00 $800,00. $62.60 $4,695.00 $100.00 $7,500.00' $55,00 $4,125.(30 200 FOOT $2.00 $400.00y1 $1.50 $300.00 $0.97 $194.00 $4.35 $870.00 $1.50 $300.00 1140 FOOT $3.00 $3,420.00 $4.50 $5,130.001 $2.28 $2,599.20 $8.50 $9,690.00 $5.00 $5,700.00 40 EACH $175.00 $7,000.00_ $40,00 $1,600.00 $113.82 $4,552,80 $100.00 $4,000.00 $100.00 $4,000.00 53 FOOT $25.00 $1,325.00 $3900 $2,067.00 $39.03 $2,088.59 $30.25 $1,603.25 $28.00 $1,484.00 49 FOOT $45.00 $2,205.00 $38.00 $1,862,00 $32.53 $1,593.97 $35.65 $1,746.85 $25.00 $1,225.00 65 FOOT $10.00 $650.00 $3.00 $19500 $5.69 $369.85 $15.00 $975.00 $10.00 $650.00 $1,304,423 25 $1,358,201.99 $1,399,981.45, $1,434,232.90 $1,481,365.05 $1,304,423.25 $1,358,201,99 $1,399,981.451 $1,434,232.80 $1,481,365.05 rAIN Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM I= CrrV USA TO: Village Manager FROM:, Director of Public Works RE: Tree Removal Bid DATE: January 31, 1995 Sealed bids were opened on January 10, 1995 for a parkway tree removal contract. This contract will entail the removal of 31 trees recently identified during our tree risk assessment pro- gram. Bid results are attached. The low b1'ddF,,fMcG1L ' "olthers, Inc., has satisfactorily per- formed forestry work for us in the past. On page 173 of the 1994-95 budget, there is $9200.00 available in accounts #01-071-08-6248 and 01-071-08-6240. 1 recommend award of a tree removal c,O''-' ct to McGinty Brothers, Inc. in an t amount not to exce -$'TX40.60. V. .. ..... . ............ .. brbert L. P-Pks SC/td attach. REMOVL95.RES/FILES/BIDS Bid Results Tree Removal Contract January 10, 1995 * Corected price lotal VA [REM199 5.XLS) 1/13195 NQTICE January 31, 1995 TBE FEBRUARY 6. ANDYEBRUARY 20, 1995 MEETINGS OF TBE SIGN REVIEW BOARIP 77" FIAVE BEEN CAN - THE NEXT MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 62 1995. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING. MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY TRUSTEES GEORGE A CLOWES TIMOTHY J, CORCORAN RICHARD N, HENDRICKS PAUL WM, HOEFERT Village io# Mount Pawrospect MICHAELE W, SKOWRON IRVANA K, WILKS VILLAGE MAIIIIIAGER 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE CLERK CAROL A, FIELDS NQTICE January 31, 1995 TBE FEBRUARY 6. ANDYEBRUARY 20, 1995 MEETINGS OF TBE SIGN REVIEW BOARIP 77" FIAVE BEEN CAN - THE NEXT MEETING IS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 62 1995. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING. CAF/ 1/10/95 Ir 1 111 20161:2-4ZArAiMMM WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that it is in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect to acquire certain properties within the corporate limits of the Village for municipal purposes; and WHEREAS, the owners of the private property being the subject of this Ordinance and the Village of Mount Prospect have reached agreement with regard to just compensation for the acquiring the subject properties for right-of-way improvements by the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS IjEC.TION ONE:, That, pursuant to the Complaint for Condemnation, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby authorize the purchase of the property legally described as follows: The East 12.00 feet of the following described tract of land: that part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of Linneman Road 520.14 feet North of South line of said Northeast Quarter, thence running West parallel with the south line of said Northeast Quarter 172.23 feet, to the East line of Lots 5, 6 and 7 in Kaplan -Braun's Fourth Addition to Mount Prospect Unit No. I, being a subdivision of Part of the North 1/2 of Section 14,Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian; thence North parallel with the West line of said road and along the East line of Lots 5, 6 and 7 126.46 feet to a comer of said Lot 5, thence East parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter 172.23 feet, thence South 126.46 feet to the point of beginning, all being in Cook County, Illinois W171111111 ST444 �E!�,TIQN TWO-, That, pursuant to the Complaint for Condemnation, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby authorize the purchase of the property legally described as following: The East 33.0 feet of the North 100 feet of the South 316 feet of the South 15 acres of the North 30 acres of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois Adjacent to 1206 Linneman Road gE.CTION 'THREE: That, pursuant to the Complaint for Condemnation, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby authorize the purchase of the property legally described as follows: The East 33.0 feet of the South 116 feet of the North 30 acres of the Northeast quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois Adjacent to 1210 Linneman Road ,§ECTlQNFOU R:, That, pursuant to the Complaint for Condemnation, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby authorize the purchase of N Acquison Page 2 of 2 the property legally described as follows: The West 20.0 feet of the South 130 feet of the West 196 feet of the North 10 acres of the South 20 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois Adjacent to 1211 Linneman Road SQCTlQ,N FIVE: That, pursuant to the Complaint for Condemnation, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby authorize the purchase of the property legally described as follows: The West 20.0 feet of the West 196 feet of the North 120 feet of the South 10 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois Adjacent to 1213 Linneman Road EQTION.-Sly: A copy of the Offer to Buy Real Estate contracts for the properties being the subject of this Ordinance are attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. .SEgLION SEVEN: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS. - ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1995. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk