Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1341_001
Next Ordinance No. 4654 Next Resolution No. 29-94 Meeting Location: Meeting Room, 1st Floor Mount Prospect Senior Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 1. CALL TO ORDER DEPUTY VILLAGE CLERK ALL VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC11 rER OF BUSINES REGULAR MEETING I Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday July 5, 1994 7:30 P. M. II. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald '"Skip" Farley Trustee George Clowes, Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele S1 Trustee Richard Hendricks Trustee Irvana Wilks IV. APPROVE MINUTES OFREGULAR MEETING, June 21, 1994 V1. MAYOR!S REPORT VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEAR Vill. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 10-Z-94 and TBA I 1 -CU -94, 350 North Wolf Road 1. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE The Petitioner has withdrawn this request due to their failure to receive a Certificate of Need from the State of Illinois. T. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 350 NORTH WOLF ROAD The Petitioner has withdrawn this request due to their failure to receive a Certificate of Need from the State of Illinois. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 18-V-941 1505 Barberry Lane The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet, instead of the required 9.5 feet, to allow an attached garage addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying this request by a vote of 4-3. B. ZBA 24-V-94, 20 North Marcella The Petitioner requested a variation to allow a circular driveway, resulting in a front yard lot coverage of 46% rather than the maximum 35% allowed. At the request of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the request was revised, eliminating the front yard lot coverage variation. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the circular driveway by a vote of 5-2. C. ZBA 25-V-94, 703 West Milburn The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a shed to be located two feet from the interior side property line, rather than the required 5 foot minimum. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the request by a vote of 7-0. D. ZBA 28-V-941 1418 East Emmerson Lane The Petitioner requested a variation to allow a 18' x 16' shed, rather than the 10' x 12' square foot shed allowed. At the request of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the Petitioner revised the variation requested to allow a 16' x 14' shed. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the revised request by a vote of 7-0. E. Acknowledge receipt of the Annual Report of the Mount Prospect Public Library. F. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance authorizes the Village to donate the 1966 Fire Department Pumper to a Southern Illinois community in need of this type of equipment due to the floods last spring. The Village Board had previously expressed a desire to make this donation. (Exhibit A) G. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance authorizes the Village to donate certain surplus video cameras from the Cable Division to School District 57. The Village Board had previously expressed a desire to make this donation. (Exhibit B) K, 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 ENTITLED "FIRE PREVENTION CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance adopts the Fire Safety regulations set forth in the BOCA Property Maintenance Code and places those regulations in the Chapter 24 (Fire Prevention Code) of the Village Code. This is a housekeeping item which entails no substantive changes to Code requirements. (Exhibit C) 1. Accept improvements installed in conjunction with the Dempster Development Center (RecPlex) J. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 ENTITLED "ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR DEALERS" IN ITS ENTIRETY This Ordinance has been revised and will be presented to the Village Board for further discussion at the next Committee of the Whole meeting on July 12th. X. VILLAGE MANAGERS REPORT A. Approve the wage agreement with the Firefighters Association B. Waive bidding procedure and authorize contract for the fire suppression system in the Historical Museum Annex. C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1993 AND ENDING MAY Is 1994 This budget amendment is required to reconcile unanticipated expenditures in the Downtown Redevelopment Fund and (Exhibit D) Capital Projects Fund. D. Status Report XI. TRUSTEE COMMENTS X11. ANY OTHER BUSINESS X111. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Sale of Property XIV. ADJOURNMENT ........... ......................................... . . . . ........................... .......... . ........ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT • JUNE 2121994 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Village Clerk Carol A. Fields called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Trustee George Clowes Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Richard Hendricks Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Irvana Wilks Absent., Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Paul Hoefert The Village Clerk requested nominations for President Pro Tem. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to nominate Trustee Corcoran as President Pro Tem. There being no further nominations, the Clerk declared nominations closed. Upon roll call to elect Trustee Corcoran as President Pro Tem. Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motionz carried., INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Hendricks. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTE Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to approve APPROVE the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor and Board of MINUTES Trustees held June 7, 1994. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Skowron, Wilks, Corcoran Nays-. None Pass: Hendricks Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Willes, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve APPROVE the following list of bills: BILLS General Fund $ 688,630 Refuse Disposal Fund 60,232 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 242,818 Community Development Block Grant Fund 4,045 Water & Sewer Fund 369,024 Parking System Revenue Fund 7,756 Risk Management Fund 111,959 Vehicle Replacement Fund 171349 Capital Improvement Fund 12,380 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 206,590 Police & Fire Building Const. 800 Flood Control Construction Fund EPA Flood Loan Construction Fund Street Improvement Construction Fund Debt Service Funds 47,197 Flexcomp Trust Fund 16,735 Escrow Deposit Fund 15,474 Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Fund 2, 67 $1,803,156 Upon roll call.- Ayes: Clewes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Wilks explained that she voted to approved all the bills except the one issued to Trustee Wilks as reimbursement for expenses. FINANCIAL REPORT Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to accept the -financial 'report for the period May 1,1994 through May 31,1994, subject to audit. Upon roll call., Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. MAYOR'S REPORT PRESENTATION: Police Chief Miller, of Skokie and as Commissioner of the RE -ACCREDITATION, Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies POLICE DEPT. (CALEA), presented the Certificate of Re -Accreditation to Police Chief Pavlock and congratulated the Village Board on the accomplished represented by this re -Accreditation. It COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD 6b TAX EXEMPTION Michael Phelps, 206 South Louis, expressed concern relative to 6b tax exemption recently granted to Cummins Allison, given the fact that several user taxes have been adopted in order to raise taxes paid by residents. It was explained by members of the Board that 6b tax exemptions are given to qualifying companies in Cook County in an effort to encourage companies to keep their businesses in Cook County. OLD BUSINESS ZBA 20-V-94 ZBA 20-V-94, 113 South Edward Street 113 S. EDWARD ST. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would grant a side yard setback of 1.09 feet, instead of the minimum requirement of 3 feet, in order to allow the replacement of an existing garage in the same location. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-3. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call.- Ayes: Clowes, Skowron, Wilks, Corcoran Nays: Hendricks Motion carried., Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for passage of ORD.NO. 4652 Ordinance No. 4652 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 113 S. EDWARD I I Vo Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Skowron, Wilks, Corcoran Nays: Hendricks Motion carried. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to reconsider RECONSIDER. - action taken by the Village Board at the last meeting relative to ZBA 15-Z-94 the request being the subject of ZBA 1 5-Z-94, which action was to 105-111 BUSSE RD deny the request to rezone property commonly known as 105, 109 and 111 South Busse Road from R -X to R-1. The Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended granting this request by a vote of 5-0. It was noted that there are 5 adjoining properties along this portion of Busse Road, 3 of which want to sell to ii who wants to build 15 single family homes. The 4th property owner expressed no interest in selling and the 5th property owner couldn't sell to Semar without the 4th lot selling as well. Staff recommended the subdivision be developed to include all 5 lots. There was discussion as to the amount of money the 4th property owner wanted for that lot and that financially, the project would not be feasible for the total cost of $2,000,000. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the rezoning being the subject of ZBA 15-Z-94. Upon roll call: Ayes: Wilks, Clowes Nays: Hendricks, Skowron NEW BUSINESS A Resolution was presented that would authorize a License Agreement FARMERS between Gail Meyers and the Village in order to conduct the annual MARKET Farmers Market held in the commuter parking lot. Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for passag' I of Resolution No. 27-94 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LICENSE TO GAIL MEYERS TO CONDUCT THE ANNUAL FARMERS MARKET IN THE VILLAGE Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would authorize the sale of 14 Air Packs from the Fire Department to the highest bidder. Page 3 - June 21, 199,f. SELL AIR PACKS A Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call,: Ayes: Clowes, Skowron, Wilks, Corcoran Nays: Hendricks Motion carried. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4653 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nayso. None Motion carried. The Motor Fuel Tax, Audits for the years 1991 and 1992, as audited bythe State of Illinois, Departme'nt of Transportation, were presented. Trustee�Clowes, seconded by TrusteeSkowron, moved to acknowledge receipt of the Motor Fuel Tax Fund accounts for the Village for 1991 and 1992. Upon roll ca,, Ayes: � Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None I Motion carried. ACCEPT A request was presented to accept the improvements installed in IMPROVEMENTS: conjunction with the Thomas More Subdivision. THOMAS MORE SUBDIVISION Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to accept the improvements installed in conjunction with the Thomas More Subdivision. Uponroll call: Ayes: I Clowes, Skowron, Wilks, Corcoran, Nays: Hendricks Motion carried, Page 4 - June 21, 1994 Upon roll call.- Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ACCEPT A request was presented to accept the improvements installed in IMPROVEMENTS: conjunction with the New Life Apostolic Faith Church, located at One NEW LIFE West Euclid Avenue. APOSTOLIC FAITH CHURCH Trudy Berndt, 3 West Euclid Avenue, asked staff to see if the location of the shed in the rear yard of the church property. is an approved location and asked if doors used by the congregation should open inward, which they do, rather than opening outward. Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to accept the improvements installed in conjunction with the New Life Apostolic Faith Church, 1 West Euclid Avenue. Uponroll call: Ayes: I Clowes, Skowron, Wilks, Corcoran, Nays: Hendricks Motion carried, Page 4 - June 21, 1994 A Resolution was presented that opposed the recent rate increase granted by the ICC to Central Telephone (Centel)., Trustee Hendricks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for passage of Resolution No. 28-94 A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY (CENTEL) $6,300,000 INCREASE IN SERVICE RATES Upon roll call'. Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks, Nays-, None Motion carried. I An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would amend Chapter 24 entitled "Fire Prevention Code" to include the BOCA Property Maintenance Code relative to Fire Safety. This Ordinance will be presented July 5th for second reading. VILLAGE MANAGERS REPORT Village Manager Michael E. Janonis presented a bid submitted for the purchase of workout clothing for the Fire Department. It was noted by Mr. Janonis that these items are purchased as needed by the individual firefighters and not as a total, so the basic bid was based on the item and quantity ordered last year. Only one bidder, Artistic, Inc., submitted a bid for these items and based on the 1993 quantities, that bid was in the amount of $4,688.78. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to accept the bid submitted by Artistic, Inc. in an amount not to exceed the budgeted amount for Fire Department Clothing. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Tnrel��= � Arequest, was presented to waive the bidding procedure in order to purchase leak,detection equipment, which is specialized equipment. It was noted that Fluid Conservation Systems has the required systems to upgrade the existing equipment, which would cost $12,240.00. Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to waive the bidding procedure relative to purchasing upgraded leak detection equipment. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None TXRRRH��� Page 5 - June 21, 1994 OPPOSE CENTEL RATEINCREASE RES.NO. 28-94 AMEND CH. 24 LEAK DETECTION EQUIPMENT FLUID CONSERVATIO SYSTEMS I Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to authorize the purchase of MS -20 leak survey tools from Fluid Conservation Systems in an amount not to exceed $12,240.00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None I EMERGENCY SEWER Mr. Janonis informed the Board that there was a recent sewer cave-in REPAIRS at I -Oka and Man A Wa. Proposals were requested from the following contractors: Vian Construction $131600 Glenbrook Construction 9,000 Mr. Janonis stated that inasmuch as this was an emergency situation and the fact that the both contractors are known to the Village, he had authorized the repairs to be done by Glenbrook Construction. The actual cost of this repair was $8,637.20 and Mr. Janonis asked that the Board ratify these emergency repairs. UPLENBROOK CONST. Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to ratify the action allthorized by the Village Manager who retained Glenbrook Construction to make, emergency sewer repairs at I -Oka and Man A Wa at a cost of $8,637. 20. f Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried., TIF CLEAN UP The Village Manger presented the final costs involved with the clean- up project of the Pine/Wiffle TIF ,site. There was a considerable amount of work involved in treating and/or removing contaminated soil at this site. It was noted that Pontarelli Builders, who will be developing this site, will pay a portion of the soil dean -up costs, resulting in a total cost to the Village for demolition and clean-up of. $233,890.50. It was also noted that the State of Illinois has a fund that may reimburse the Village for the removal of old gasoline tanks., Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to authorize payment to Albrecht Enterprises for the clean-up of the Pine/Wille TIF site in an amount of $233,890.50. Upon roll call:- Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. TRUSTEE COMMENTS Trustee Wilks encouraged members of the Board to attend the annual Illinois Municipal League Conference held in Chicago each year during September. ANY OTHER BUSINESS None. Page 6 - June 21, 1994 11 EXECUTIVE SESSION EXECUTIVE Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to adjourn into SESSION Executive Session for the purpose of discussing Personnel. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. The Village Board went into Executive Session at 9:16 P.M. Mayor Pro Tem Corcoran reconvened the meeting at 10:28 P.M. Present upon roll call: Mayor Pro Tem Corcoran Trustee Clowes Trustee Hendricks Trustee Skowron Trustee Wilks ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN Mayor Pro Tem Corcoran adjourned the meeting at 10:32 P.M,* Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 7 - June 21, 1994 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION June 30, 1994 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 6117194 through Per Attached Journal Balance 194 6130194 List of Bills Entry 6130194 _n General Fund $ 3,807,368 $ 517,385 $ 6439019 $ 3,681,734 Refuse Disposal Fund 650683 241,687 2413,117 (1501,747) Motor Fuel Tax 3891,675 - 24 3899651 Community Development Block Grant 1,151 - 2,340 ( 1,189) nternrise Unds Water & Sewer Fund 1,864,871 170,095 999244 1,935,722 Parking System Revenue Fund 364,200 6,932 1,224 369,908 l w mai Semi Fu s Risk Management Fund 11,412,107 15,472 102,659 193241,920 Vehicle Replacement Fund 754,865 - 220 754,645 CUMQUM rwig=- Capital Improvement Fund 2440485 38,390 169143 2661,732 Downtown Redev Const Funds 642,143 - 1399755 502,388 Police & Fire Building Construction 203,310 - - 203,310 Flood Control Construction Fund 1,911,881 - 1,911,881 EPA Flood Loan Construction Fund {7,350} - - {7,350} Street Improvement Const Fund 4,9481,443 - 4,9481,443 Debt Service Funds 29493,515 99,987 32,622 21,4709880 rus _ F nd - Flexcomp Trust Fund 2:719 51,488 - - 81207 Escrow Deposit Fund 11,0329930 14,126 25,355 1,021,701 Police Pension Fund 19,901,074 14,424 519623 19,8637875 Firemen's Pension Fund 22,840,739 441,563 531,707 22,8319,595 Benefit Trust Funds 221.589 - 221.$89 - - 47 INVOICE AMOUNT $170.00 $2,213.00 $7,222.98 $446-00 $369.22 $153-50 $107.50 $458,534.D2 $1,849.47 $1,507.31 $43,412.76 816.62 268-00 $18,152.05 $40,337.62 $279.00 $10,764.20 $150-00 $41.92 $4.32 2.62 $.27 $2.62 $.27 $.27 $2.62 $2.62 $.27 $1,000.00 $1 867.31 X800.00 $14,235.71 $118.95 $113.94 $3,287.98 $61-95 PAGE 1 $170.00 $2,213-00 $7,222.98 $446-00 $369.22* $153.50* $107.50 $506,120.18* $268.00* $58,489.67 $279.00 $10,764.20 $150.00* $46.24 $11.56 $1,000-00 $1,867.31 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT,DATE 6/30/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION CLEARING ACCOUNTS ACCO CUTTER COMPANY 1'CORNER CUTTER BADGER METER INC SOFTWARE BELL FUELS, INC. FUEL KEVIN E. BOIVIN RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE KELLY BUSH PMT P/R 6Z23/94 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PMT P(R 6723 ED CURTIS RENTAL, INC. UI_p_k`ENT RENTAL DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNTR ENDING 6Z23/94 RENDING 2394 P%�623%94 ENDING PZR ENDING 6Z23Z94 P7R E -DING 6Z23794 COLEEN HELFENBEIN PMT P R 6123794 1994 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT EMPLWO EE SHARE -JUNE EMPLOYER SHARE JUNE 1994 IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE' JULY 94 PREMIUM NELS J. JOHNSON PKWY TREE TRIMMING ANDREA JUSZCZYK PMT -PIR 6/23/94 OVERPMT CHRISTOPHER KARNEY REFUND WATER REFUND WATER OVERPMT KIMBALL HILL INC. REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT ERIK LAWS COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM VLADIMAR LEN COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM SAVINGS BONDS P/R 6/23 NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. DUE TO FED DEP P/R 6Z23 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 623 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 6Z23 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 6Z23 DUE TO FED DEP P7R 6723 INVOICE AMOUNT $170.00 $2,213.00 $7,222.98 $446-00 $369.22 $153-50 $107.50 $458,534.D2 $1,849.47 $1,507.31 $43,412.76 816.62 268-00 $18,152.05 $40,337.62 $279.00 $10,764.20 $150-00 $41.92 $4.32 2.62 $.27 $2.62 $.27 $.27 $2.62 $2.62 $.27 $1,000.00 $1 867.31 X800.00 $14,235.71 $118.95 $113.94 $3,287.98 $61-95 PAGE 1 $170.00 $2,213-00 $7,222.98 $446-00 $369.22* $153.50* $107.50 $506,120.18* $268.00* $58,489.67 $279.00 $10,764.20 $150.00* $46.24 $11.56 $1,000-00 $1,867.31 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE. A-1/301/9-4- VENDOR /30/94VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION CLEARING ACCOUNTS WILLIAM O'KEEFE STEVE O'NEIL PENSION DISBURSEMENTS PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. POSTMASTER PAUL ROZYCKI SURINDER SINGH CRAIG STEZSKAL TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS VANITIES INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WALGREENS WEARGUARD ARTHUR WEILER, INC. XEROX CORPORATION ZIEBART [Nf i mei weiin" i PMT INS CLAIMS-CRAWFORD REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT C12861 METER RENTAL JUNE POLICE PENSION DISB JUNE FIRB PENSION DISB MISC EXPENSES POSTAGE STAMPS REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT REFUND WATER OVERPMT SEWER CHARGE REFUND SVCS RENDERED BOND MONEY BOND MONEY BOND MONEY BOND MONEY SVCS RENDERED SVCS RENDERED STORAGE CABINET DISB DEMOLITION DEPOSIT DISB RESTORATION DEPOSIT DISB STREET OBSTRUCTION BOND DISB TREE PLANTING DEPOSITS DISB DUMPSTER DEPOSIT DISB SECURITY GUARANTY BOND OVERPMT VEHICLE STICKER CLOTHING CLOTRING TREES TREES INR RUSTPROOF 94 PICKUP f $24,579.58 $2.62 $.27 $257.85 $51,622.97 $53,706-63 $2.00 $274.40 $21.60 $2.24 $.84 8.10 $2.37 $3,290.00 $2,400.00 $1,250.00 $1,925.00 $775.00 $10,969.37 $1,674.00 $310.00 $300.00 $7,970.00 $850.00 $825.00 $350.00 $3,800.00 $22.50 $53.07 $35.98 $3,040.00 $320.00 $520.00 $220.00 ***TOTAL** TOTAL $43,198.11* $2.89 $257.85 $105,329.60* $2.00* $274.40* $23.84 $38.94 2.37 $3,290.00 * $6,350.00* $12,643.37 $310.00 * * * $14,095.00* $22.50 $89.05 $3,360.00 $520.00 $220.00 $779,698.28 VENDOR GENERAL FUND COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT WATER & SEWER FUND VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND POLICE PENSION FUND ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT LAURA LUTERI PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 $8.39 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $554,436.48 REFUSE FUND $1,968.42 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. CAPITALDISPOSAIMPROVL $12 643.37 91,621.25 $ 2 666.48 PARKING SYSTEMEMENT REVENUENFUND $878.57 $220.00 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $24,579.58 $51,622.97 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND $53,706.63 $25,354.53 ***TOTAL** ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELAT. DONATION-PEYTON $25.00 $25.00* LAURA LUTERI SOUSA MUSIC $8.39 $8.39 NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE ICMA ENV MANDATES ASSESSMT $150.00 $150.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $100.39 LEGAL SERVICES $481.76 MISC EXPENSES $20.33 $120.72* SCHWEPPE & SONS COFFEE SUPPLIES $85.96 $85.96 VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ***TOTAL** $390.07 GENERAL FUND $390.07 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ARNSTEIN & LEHR MAY LEGAL SERVICES $25.45 MAY LEGAL SERVICES $250.00 MAY LEGAL SERVICES $1,116.26 MMAY LEGAL SERVICES $3,950.00 MAY LEGAL SERVICES $291.90 MAY LEGAL SERVICES $287.50 MAY LEGAL SERVICES $481.76 MAY LEGAL SERVICES $138.75 MAY LEGAL SERVICES $275.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE DAILY HERALD HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER ICMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE REGISTR MICHAEL E. JANONIS NORTHERN ILLINOIS POLICE ALARM PEDERSEN & HOUPT PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. DAVID STRAHL VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C. VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE GENERAL FUND MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES EMPLOYMENT AD FRE -EMP PHYSICAL-NOLAN PHYSICAL -MC CARTHY PHYSICAL-BOQUIST PHYSICAL-METZINGER REGIS -DAVID STRAHL EXPENSES-ICMA LUNCHEON-PAVLOCR MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MAY LEGAL SERVICES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING ICMA CONF EXPENSES MAY LEGAL SERVICES $10,201.43 INVOICE AMOUNT $180.65 $50.00 $162.50 $50.00 $34.05 $3.20 $424,08 $58.00 $58.00 $58.00 $58.00 $390.00 $47.25 $12.00 $27-50 �j � $410(/.0�j 5 $21.25 $414.75 $191.25 $318.75 /� $94.8�(5 $10.64 $43.64 $46.00 $10.40 $210.00 ***TOTAL** PAGE 4 $7,297.02 $424.08 $232.00 $390.00 $47.25 $12.00 $1,383.55 * $149.13* $46.00 $10.40 $210.00 $10,201.43 MISC EXPENSES $11-16 MISC EXPENSES $12.52 $47.94* RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS ENVELOPES $213-50 $213.50 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES 1 IBM PRINTWHEEL $34.85 $34-85 XEROX CORPORATION MAY 1090 COPIER CHCS $3,543-11 $3,543.11 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT -6 PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE* AMOUNT TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ALLCOMt INC. SVCS RENDERED $104-50 $104.50 CAROLYN A. MILLER COMM ASST COW MTG $25.00 $25-00 PHYLLIS MOLIERE COMM ASST VB MTG $25.00 $25-00 NATOA/NLC 3 PROGRAM AWARD ENTRIES $105-00 $105.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $48.29 MISC EXPENSES 3.49 MISC EXPENSES 4.57 MISC EXPENSES $10 96 MISC EXPENSES $29:45 MISC EXPENSES $3.07 $119.83* TASCHO SAEMS COMM ASST VB MTG $25-00 $25.00 WALTER SOSIN COMM ASST COW MTG $25-00 $25-00 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ***TOTAL** $429.33 GENERAL FUND $429.33 FINANCE DEPARTMENT DRAKE TRAINING & TECHNOLOGY CNA EXAM FEE85.00 189-95 85-00* 989.95 ELEK-TEKr INC. SUPPLIES JAY'N BEE OFFICE SOLUTIONSrINC SUPPLIES $509.00 $509.00 KIPLINGER WASHINGTON LETTER 2 YR SUBSCRIPTION $120.00 $120-00 METRO EXPRESS, INC. DELIVERY $23.00 DELIVERY $12.50 $35.50 MIDWEST DATA COMM INC. CERTIFY DATA LINES $480-00 $480.00* PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $24.26 MISC EXPENSES $11-16 MISC EXPENSES $12.52 $47.94* RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS ENVELOPES $213-50 $213.50 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES 1 IBM PRINTWHEEL $34.85 $34-85 XEROX CORPORATION MAY 1090 COPIER CHCS $3,543-11 $3,543.11 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT EXCESS LOSS PREM JULY 94 ***TOTAL** $5,158.85 GENERAL FUND $5,158.85 ADMIN FEES JULY 94 $4,587.45 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 6%28 $40,926.33 JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS LEGAL NOTICE $108.54 $304.55 LEGAL NOTICE$112.56 TIME & EXPENSE BILLING LEGAL NOTICE $104.52 FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE LEGAL NOTICE $120.60 $2,347.55 LEGAL NOTICE $108.54 $14,911.38 LEGAL NOTICE $108.54 LEGAL NOTICE $52.26 LEGAL NOTICE $52.26 $767.82 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $767.82 GENERAL FUND $767.82 ******************************************************************************************************** RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BROOKFIELD EXCESS LOSS PREM JULY 94 $14,497.08 ADMIN FEES JULY 94 $4,587.45 MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 6%28 $40,926.33 $60,010.86* CRAWFORD & COMPANY TIME & EXPENSE BILLING $304.55 TIME & EXPENSE BILLING $149.54 $459.09 FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE JULY 1994 $2,347.55 $2,347.55 HMO ILLINOIS JULY HEALTH INSURANCE $14,911.38 $14,911.38 GENERAL FUND $417.55 ******************************************************************************************************** POLICE DEPARTMENT AETNA TRUCK PARTS CREDIT $15.00-- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER SVCS-60057850012 $61.25 $61.25 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SVCS-9900150749—X $75.00 $75.00 GUS G. PALOIAN SVCS RENDERED $87.00 $87.00 RECORD COPY SERVICES SERVICES RENDERED $127.50 $127.50 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ***TOTAL*-* $78,079.63 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $78,079.63 INSPECTION SERVICES FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE SERVICE REQUEST FORMS $169.00 $169.00 PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $23.00 MISC EXPENSES $30.00 MISC EXPENSES $12.51 MISC EXPENSES $5.35 MISC EXPENSvo ES $8.79 MISC EXPENSES $15.00 $94.65* KELLY P. REYNOLDS & ASSOC.INC. REFERENCE MATERIAL $70.00 $70.00 TOPCON MIDWEST SUPPLIES $84.00 $84.00 INSPECTION SERVICES ***TOTAL** $417.65 GENERAL FUND $417.55 ******************************************************************************************************** POLICE DEPARTMENT AETNA TRUCK PARTS CREDIT $15.00-- VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT ALPINE CAMERA CO., INC. AMERICAN DATA PRODUCTS AMERICAN LOCKER SECURITY SYST. AMERITECH AUTO CLUTCH MICHAEL BARRETT BT PUBLIX BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. COMP USA GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES HANSEN ASSOCIATES ILLINOIS RECOVERY SYSTEMS INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON KALE UNIFORMS, INC. LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC MINNESOTA SPIAA MOTOROLA, INC. PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION PARTS PARTS CAMERA & SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT SUPPLIES 2 LARGE TOKENS SERVICE MTCE SUPPLIES EXPENSES PRINTER RIBBONS MAY 94 CAR WASHES TAPES P-10 WHEEL ALIGNMENT 2 BOXES IBM TONER REMOVE OIL & ANTI -FREEZE PARTS PARTS OIL FILTERS OIL FILTERS 31 SGT STRIPES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES REGISTER-RICHARDSEN SERVICE AGREEMENT TUITION-RIORDAN ARREST REPORTS MEMO PADS FORMS FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING INVOICE AMOUNT $74.96 $76.60 $204.10 $48.60 $136.50- $346.00 $33.87 $39.12 $224.18 $18.00 $110.88 $757.70 $95.94 $39.00 $244.41 $155.00 $31.56 46.46 48.48 $34.04 4-35 $19-95 $59.81 59.80 59.80 $59.80 $150.00 $61250. 098.40 00 $155.20 $50.00 $284.35 $8.32 $26.16 $18-48 2.48 PAGE 8 $136.56 $257.70 $204.50 $33.87 $39.12 $224.18 $18.00 $110.88 $757.70 $95.94 $39.00 $244.41 $155.00 $130.54 $3435 $259.16 $150.00* $6,098.40. $250.00 $489.55 GENERAL FUND $10o069.24 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADRON INDUSTRIES, INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $162.50 PAGE 9 AIR LIQUIDE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APP OVAL REPORT $21.00 $21.00 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. PAYMENT DATE 6 30/94 $326.10 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 4—FXI CARTRIDGES $389.16 FILM PROCESSING $7.16 $896.16 AMERITECH FILM PROCESSING $4.02 FILM PROCESSING $27.98 FILM PROCESSING $88.00 FILM PROCESSING $17.78 $210.38 SCHMERLER FORD INC. JUNE 94 CAR RENTAL $100.00 $100-00 TRW CREDIT DATA DIVISION BACKGROUND CK INFO $25.00 $25.00 POLICE DEPARTMENT ON LINE SERVICE ***TOTAL** $10,069-24 GENERAL FUND $10o069.24 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADRON INDUSTRIES, INC. REPAIR PARTS $162.50 $162-50 AIR LIQUIDE CYLINDERS $21.00 $21.00 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. SVCS RENDERED $326.10 SVCS RENDERED $1r300-00 $1t626.10 AMBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP., INC. 4—FXI CARTRIDGES $389.16 NTCE AGREEMENT $507.00 $896.16 AMERITECH SERVICE $130-53 SERVICE $40.69 SERVICE $21-01 SERVICE $18.75 $210.98 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. MAY 94 CAR WASHES $61-90 $61-90 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 302.50 $302-50 CONNECT INC. ON LINE SERVICE 1206.16 $206.16 CONNECT, INC. BASE RATE $25.60 $25.60 EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC. FLAT TIRE REPAIR $80-00 $80-00 WILKIE ESCONDO CLOTHING $300-64 $300.64 FIRE ENGINEERING 1 YR SUBSCRIPTION $24.95 $24.95 FLEET*SAFETY SUPPLY PUBLICATION $29.95 $29-95 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOC IPELRA KELLY SERVICES, INC. KREST UNIFORMS, INC. MACWAREHOUSE MOTOROLA, INC. PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. SAVANT WELDING SUPPLY, INC. SPECIALTY TECHNICAL PURL. INC. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBA FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION TIRE REPAIRS TIRE REPAIRS TIRE REPAIRS $508.40 REGISTER-RICKER REGISTER-UIDL $750.00 REGISTER-ULREICH $445.00 TEMP HELP -DEMOS TEMP HELP-MCGINTY $l, 164.68 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $50.00 1 SCREENSHOT $371.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT $1,121.40 MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING MEDICAL OXYGEN CYLINDER MANUAL $248.75 REGISTER-REINLEIN $135.00 REGISGER-WOJCIK $100.00 $8,702.48 PAGE 10 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $12.75 $318.88 $176.77 $508.40 $250.00 $500.00 $750.00 $445.00 $445.00 $572.40 $592.28 $l, 164.68 $50.00 $50.00 $37.00 $371.00 $1,121.40 $1,121.40 $15.00 $4.96 $61.05 $6.46 $11.50 $16.25 $3.47 $118.69 $75.12 $75.12 $248.75 $248.75 $135.00 $100.00 $235.00 ***TOTAL** $8,702.48 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS JULY SVCS RENDERED $33,026.25 $33,026.25 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES ***TOTAL** $33,026.25 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT tW PAGE 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROV REPORT PAYMENTDATE 6/30/5-4 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $33,026.25 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC. SENIORTAXI RIDES 187.05 9124.20 187.05 8124.20* N Y CENTERS KENNETH YOUNG REGISTER-MORGAN/ABERNETHY MIHAI THE SELF-HELP CENTER --N PUBLICATION $ 45.00 $ 45.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $26.10 MISC EXPENSES $6.55 MISC EXPENSES $15.00 MISC EXPENSES 10.00 MISC EXPENSES 918.00 $75.65* HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $431.90 GENERAL FUND $431.90 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO. SVCS RENDERED $308.00 SVCS RENDERED $398.00 $706.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $3.94 MISC EXPENSES $13.11 $17.05* RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS ENVELOPES $15.25 $15.25 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $738.30 GENERAL FUND $19.19 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $719.11 VENDOR STREET DIVISION ACCU CUTTER COMPANY AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. AETNA TRUCK PARTS AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL ANTIOCH TIRE, INC. MELVYN BOTH BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. CADE INDUSTRIES CENTURY LABS/PRO CLEAN, INC. CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CINTAS CORP CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI CLARKE COMMONWEALTH EDISON CONRAD AND SON ED CURTIS RENTAL; INC. DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS ENGINEMASTERSr INC. FINISHMASTERr INC. ELEANOR FINN FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APP OVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6 30/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL 1 CORNER CUTTER $6.35 $6.35 SUPPLIES $124.08 $124.08 PARTS $108.00 PARTS $88.64 $196-64 SUPPLIES $481-59 $481.59 UNIFORM PANTS $319.47 $319.47 ROAD SVCE-FLAT TIRE $174-95 TIRE REPAIR & MOUNT $22.00 $196.95 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $97.39 $97.39 MAY 94 CAR WASHES $28-00 $28.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES $222.63 CLEANING SUPPLIES $222.63 CLEANING SUPPLIES $222-63 CLEANING SUPPLIES $222-62 CLEANING SUPPLIES $222.62 CLEANING SUPPLIES $222-62 CLEANING SUPPLIES $208.50 $1,544.25 SUPPLIES $301-80 SUPPLIES $126.02 $427.82 CLNG SUPPLIES $296-39 CLNG SUPPLIES $21.78 $318-17 UNIFORM SERVICE $128.10 UNIFORM SERVICE $128.10 UNIFORM SERVICE $128-10 $384-30 WATER USAGE $95.79 $95.79 REPL PARTS $229-60 $229.60 BJ80-JT-23212 $87-52 $87.52 SUPPLIES $245.17 $245.17 EQUIPMENT RENTAL $17.50- $17.50 SUPPLIES $47.00 REBUILT ENGINE 847.00 $ 05.16 MICE SUPPLIES $11.00 $816.16 SUPPLIES $4.08 SUPPLIES $8.70 $12.78 REIMB CDL $30-00 $30-00 SUPPLIES $57.31 $57.31 VENDOR STREET DIVISION FRIES AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC THE GLIDDEN COMPANY EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO. JOHN HUBKA IBBOTSON HEATING CO. ILLINOIS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ILLINOIS RECOVERY SYSTEMS INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON MELS J. JOHNSON EDMUND KLAHS LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC J.C. LICHT COMPANY LUNDSTROM'S NURSERY MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PROFESSIONAL FINISH PROSAFETY SHEPP PEST CONTROL VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION TOW 4501 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REPLACE SIDEWALK HVAC SERVICE DUES -CLARK REMOVE OIL & ANTI -FREEZE PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PKWY TREE TRIMMING S�C SIDEWALK C R RENTALS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TURF MOWING TURF MOWING REBUILD ALTERNATOR SVCS RENDERED MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING MEETINGS SUPPLIES TRAINING TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES PARTS MTCE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES JUNE 94 PEST CONTROL JUNE 94 PEST CONTROL JUNE 94 PEST CONTROL JUNE 94 PEST CONTROL JUNE 94 PEST CONTROL INVOICE AMOUNT $75:00 $8904 $1673 $106.00 $7250 300.00 155.00 $9.71 $68.40 $53.19 $11.52 $2,860.16 19-70 $96.00 $2,550.00 $36.89 $9.45 $7.10 $17.02 $4,120.00 $295.00 $45.00 $512.00 $13.64 $16.02 $9.95 $28.78 $84.41 $52.92 8 90.00 12.85 $44.17 $44.17 $44.17 $44.17 $44.16 PAGE 13 TOTAL $75.00 $89.04 $16.73 $106.00 $72,50 $300.00 $155.00 $202.98 $2,919.70 $9600 $2,550.00 $70.46 $4,415.00 $45.00 $512.00 $29.66 $123.14* $52.92 $90.00 $12.85 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ACME PARTS & SUPPLY VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $64.51 PAGE 14 ACTION CONCRETE & SUPPLY ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $975.00 PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 $650-00 $1,625.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION PARTS $93.26 $241.44 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL JUNE 94 PEST CONTROL $44.16 $265-00 STANTON EQUIPMENT COMPANY MICE SUPPLIES $3.50 MTCE SUPPLIES $119.24 $122.74 TECH SYN CORPORATION MICE SUPPLIES $73.23 SUPPLIES $21.80 SUPPLIES $36.70 $131-73 WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS SIGNS $182.20 $182.20 WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES PARTS $10.98 $10-98 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO WINDOW CLEANING $81:00 WINDOW CLEANING $104.00 WINDOW CLEANING $81.00 WINDOW CLEANING $81.00 $347.00 KRISTA ZALOUDEK REIMB CDL $30.00 $30-00 STREET DIVISION ***TOTAL** $18,752.47 GENERAL FUND $18,752.47 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ACME PARTS & SUPPLY MICE SUPPLIES $64.51 $64.51 ACTION CONCRETE & SUPPLY CONCRETE $975.00 CONCRETE $650-00 $1,625.00 AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $148.18 PARTS $93.26 $241.44 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL UNIFORM PANTS $319.46 $319.46 AMERITECH SERVICE $31.21 SERVICE $207.71 SERVICE $543-27 SERVICE $37.04 SERVICE $31-21 SERVICE $31.21 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE'AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION SERVICE $62.42 SERVICE $31.21 SERVICE $97-32 SERVICE $18.42 SERVICE $18.47 SERVICE 36.25 SERVICE 817.87 $1,163.61 AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES SERVICE CALL $248.00 $248.00 AWWA SDWA ADVISOR $105-00 $105-00 BADGER METER INC SOFTWARE $2.35 WATER METERS $15,733-00 $15,735-35 BERLAND'S HOUSE OF TOOLS MICE SUPPLIES $209.63 $209-63 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. MAY 94 CAR WASHES $48.25 $48.25 CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO 5494 SERVICE $168.78 $168.78 CENTURY LABS PRO CLEAN, INC. S PPLIES $124.89 $124.89 CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CLNG SUPPLIES $311.35 $311-35 CINTAS CORP UNIFORM SERVICE $128.10 UNIFORM SERVICE 128.10 UNIFORM SERVICE 8128.10 $384.30 ARTHUR CLESEN, INC. HERBICIDE $476.77 $476.77 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BJ80-JT-23598 $2,893.12 $2,893-12 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BF67-JT-0646-A $23-17 BD75-JT-2744-D $75.07 $98.24 COMP USA SUPPLIES 117.98 1560-00 $117.98 DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC. TOPSOIL $560.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP PRIORITY DELIVERIES $113.25 $113.25 GLENBROOK EXCAVATING SVCS RENDERED $4,637.20 SVCS RENDERED $4r000.00 $8,637.20 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. SUPPLIES $50.04 $50.04 H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE METERS $120-00 METERS $60-00 METERS $71.37 METERS $30-00 METERS $785.07 METERS $570.96 $1,637.40 EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO. SUPPLIES $92.12 $92.12 VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ILLINOIS RECOVERY SYSTEMS INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON JULIE, INC. J.C. LICHT COMPANY LUNDSTROIMI ' S NURSERY MEYER MATERIAL CO. MIDWAY TRUCK PARTS NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL -FILM L NET MIDWEST, INC. NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PROFESSIONAL FINISH PROSAFETY RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP. MICHAEL SWANSON TECH SYN CORPORATION VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC. WAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APP OV _ REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6 30/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION REMOVE OIL & ANTI -FREEZE PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS SERVICE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TURF MOWING MATERIALS MATERIALS PARTS SAFETY FILM MAY94 WATER SAMPLES CHEMICAL ANALYSIS 330 E KENSINGTON 1 E RAND 112 E HIGHLAND AVE TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES PARTS AIR COMPRESSOR MECE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FILM & PROCESSING REIMB DRIVEWAY REPAIRS MICE SUPPLIES REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS REPAIRS PAGE 16 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $155.00 $155.00 $10.44 $6.12 $68.40 $11.52 $60.16 $156.64 $195.20 $3.20 $198.40 $14.90 $17.60 $135.90 $165.50 $10.25 $344.15 $484.00 $484.00 $66.50 $33..25 $99.75 $44.12 $+44.12 $85.00 $85.00 88.00 $2.635.00 $2,923.00 $32.73 $63.07 $95.80 $4.10 $4.65 $9.50 $18.25* $82.59 $589.31 $671.90 $90.00 $90.00 $12.85 $12.85 $47.95 $47.95 $185.00 $185.00 $73.22 $73.22 $52.90 $88.00 $127.00 $267.90 $239.65 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $345.12 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION z REPAIRS $267.20 $506.85 WEARGUARD CLOTHING $122.83 $122.83 WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES PARTS $151.49 $151.49 WINKELMMANS RADIATOR CO. FUEL TANK REPAIR $95.00 $95.00 ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS CREDIT $60.00-- MTCE SUPPLIES $60.00 MICE SUPPLIES $225.00 MFCE SUPPLIES $144.00 MTCE SUPPLIES $478.80 FIRE HYDRANTS $3,475.00 $4x322.80 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ***TOTAL** $46,577.59 WATER & SEWER FUND $46,577.59 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION COMMONWEALTH EDISON SERVICE $16.95 SERVICE $7.01 BF68-JT-3048-A $16.95 BF66-JT-4464--A $103.49 BF66-JT-4472-C $119.72 $264.12 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO WINDOW CLEANING $81.00 $81.00 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $345.12 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $345.12 ******************************************************************************************************** CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVANTAGE SIGN SUPPLY INC. COMPUTER $3,500.00 $3,500.00 COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR 1ST INSTALL 1992 & PENALTY $30x768.44 2ND INSTALL 1992 & PENALTY $47,592.90 1ST INSTALL 1993 & PENALTY $61x393.98 $139,755.32* NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 1 S EMERSON $24.22 $24.22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $143,279.54 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $3,500.00 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST FUND $139,779.54 ******************************************************************************************************** COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES COMMONWEALTH EDISON BG21-JT-1838-A $44.91 $44.91 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO WINDOW CLEANING $171.00 $171.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $215.91 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6%3/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY MAY COLLECTIONS $125,051.13 MAY COLLECTIONS $41,950.60 MAY COLLECTIONS $27,567.19 MAY COLLECTIONS $42,046.29 MAY COLLECTIONS $2,533.23 $239,148.44* REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $239rl48.44 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $239,148.44 ******************************************************************************************************** CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVANTAGE SIGN SUPPLY INC. COMPUTER $3,500.00 $3,500.00 COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR 1ST INSTALL 1992 & PENALTY $30x768.44 2ND INSTALL 1992 & PENALTY $47,592.90 1ST INSTALL 1993 & PENALTY $61x393.98 $139,755.32* NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 1 S EMERSON $24.22 $24.22 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $143,279.54 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $3,500.00 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST FUND $139,779.54 ******************************************************************************************************** COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES COMMONWEALTH EDISON BG21-JT-1838-A $44.91 $44.91 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO WINDOW CLEANING $171.00 $171.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $215.91 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 1 1974 $10r000-00 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I $3t220.00 IF EPA FLOOD LOAN B & I FUND $19r402.59 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $1,409r052.89 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/30/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $215.91 DEBT SERVICE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO SSA 1 INT D711 94 $3f220.00 $3,220.00* NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECTr N.A. CORP PURP 19 4 INT D741494 $10,000.00 $10f000-00* TREASURER, STATE OF ILLINOIS IEPA PRINCIPAL & INTE E T $9f271.09 IEPA PRINCIPAL & INTEREST $10i131.50 $19,402-59 DEBT SERVICE ***TOTAL** $32 622.59 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 1 1974 $10r000-00 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I $3t220.00 IF EPA FLOOD LOAN B & I FUND $19r402.59 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $1,409r052.89 DATE RUN 6/30/94 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20 TIME RUN 10.20.38 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID--APPBAR SUMMARY BY FUND 6/30%94 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $643,019.07 11 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $241,116.86 13 COMMUNITY DEVLPNT BLOCK GRANT $2x340.36 24 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974 $10,000.00 44 EPA FLOOD LOAN B & I FUND $19,402.59 46 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I $3,220.00 51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $16,143.37 55 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST FUND $139,779.54 61 WATER & SEWER FUND $99,244.07 63 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $1,223.69 67 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $220.00 69 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $102,659.21 71 POLICE PENSION FUND $51,622.97 72 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND $53,706.63 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $25,354.53 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,409,052.$9 PLANNING DEPARTMENT . .. ... . ... . .... PETITIONER'S APPLICATION - MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Ratitflo IN L&Irkgn, L Ll—lj,4, . .............. -71 Zoning. C=pt 4 ............ . . Qwngr; �posed; Prowlseld, -Contact Personi: M*rt- 01 7 4- B fWameAddreqVphnne 9) 3BR: I COMPLIES WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? 2. COMPLIES WITH THOROUGHFARE PLAN? 3. VARIATIONS NEEDED FROM ZONING REGULATIONS? (See below.) 4. SUBDIVISION REQUIRED? Surrounding zoning and land uses: North - R- I Single Family Residences South - R-1 Single Family Residences East - R-1 Single Family Residences West - R-1 Single Family Residences Ibis case is a resultof a complaint of a conunercial, vehicle parking on the dri'veway. Thehorneowner must remove the vehicle from, the property or store ift in the garage. The vaniation. is needed to resolve the complaint. Djrject.. o . r -W Date ON- --------- 1. PUBLIC RAPROVENENTS REQUIRED: ...... NES NO COM TENTS a. Underground Utilities water........... Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer. b. Surface Improvement Pavement .......... Curb & Gutter . . . . . . Sidewalks Street Lighting ........ c,, Easements Utility& Drainage Access ........... 2. PERNUTS, REQUIRED OTHER THAN VILLAGE: a. MWRDGC b. IDOT c. ARMY CORP d. TEPA e., MiD f OTHER 2b ENGINEERING DIVISION (Continued) NO 3. R.O.W. DEDICATIONS?. 4. SITE PLAN ACCEPTABLE?. oil +4,rt-a m c, TfN L_$ 15 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT ACCEPTABLE?. AJ4 6. TRAFFIC STUDY ACCEPTABLE? . I , AJ." 7. STORM WATER DETENTION REQUIRED.. No 1 8. FLOOD PLAIN OR FLOODWAY EXISTING? . y 9. WETLAND E)GSTING? GENERAL COMMENTS: ivc-uj Ac. K CO"? I Al 7r 5 46w 5 LJAJE> 'mo= 4005C_ WILL - GA "7 S f IP YA Ply.54-4 WAJ 1,00 C.-1Aj e - f �-tj r PLANS PREPARED BY, DATE OF PLANS.- u�_ �q Engineering Coordinator Date ► FIRE, DA TENT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION - MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 14� Locabgn: kz T 777J . .... . Zpring.,Cuff • Propo5edl- Rlotmsed; 2% Cass ).A'; V)il 3 1. NUMBER OF STORIES . l 2. HEIGHT OF BUILDING. 3. FIRE LANES . . . . . . .. 4. FIRE HYDRANTS . . . . . .. . . 5. STANDPIPE . 6. SPRINKLERS. . . . . . . . . . 7. FIRE PUMP . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 8. FIRE ALARM 9. COULD A FIRE ON THE PROPOSED USE BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED EXTINGUISfIED'07 IF NOT, WHAT SPECIFIC CHANGES AND REQUIREMENTS DO YOU SUGGEST TO ACH[EVE THIS PURPOSET 10. DO ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED CUL-DE-SACS ALLOW ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR EM[ERGENCY'VEFUCLES? 11. GENERAL COI' 20ENTS -. Director Date [IF INSPECTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION - MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 0 Pin, 11110cr 9� at"on- k (Z Z 4 f ojo A L Lee— !!Alm . ........... Mr. 7-1 z Current, p_gy 1 Owne Proposel-,,, .... ................ . . . . ..... a.- NQ&I Np-.-Units. I BR: R& NO See Comment L x VARIATIONS NEEDED FROM VILLAGE BUILDING CODE (See below) 2. x MEETS HEALTIVSAFETY CODE REQUIREMENTS TENT& Building Code calls for 1 Hr. rated walls and ceiling on attached garages. This requires a minimum of 518" Class X Drywall. . . . . . .... . . .............................. .. . 4 /-/ Director Date 1. CHARACTER OF USE: (WOULD IT BE A PROBLEM TYPE?) 2. ARE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS ADEQUATE? 3. PRESENT TRAFFIC PROBLEMS? 4. TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AT PARTICULAR LOCATION: 5. TRAFFIC PROBLEMS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT: el o(,L,- Z-7 e'- L A) 4'i y �fc:r7s?l Alf- 1 it for L( Date POLICE DEPARTMENT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION - MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PAllionl-IV Pejj*tioner: I '1.0� m _ . Zoning. Current. OmMer; 61 Use. . .... ProwlnA; !Q,ontact Pci,%Qo Site. Grog Ar!g; NQ. 11mil 1, BR: 2 B& (Name/A,dd,ress/Plh!2ne 3 BRA 4 B, 1. CHARACTER OF USE: (WOULD IT BE A PROBLEM TYPE?) 2. ARE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS ADEQUATE? 3. PRESENT TRAFFIC PROBLEMS? 4. TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AT PARTICULAR LOCATION: 5. TRAFFIC PROBLEMS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT: el o(,L,- Z-7 e'- L A) 4'i y �fc:r7s?l Alf- 1 it for L( Date .......... PUBLIC WORKS DEPARn"ENT PETITIONER'S APPLICATION - MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ELL' "n T. C Zgning- Q=n L& 6 L , q Ownev... List c=0A, QQnjg&,_tPersgn- Site., Gross IF I . ....... . ..... �-Lots; No. BRA 2 4 BR. 3 DR: ,Nam,f,!Addre hone, EXISTING REQUIRED IMPROYE DIER-MMEN MENTS, I. UTILITIES: Water Metering Backflow Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer 2. SURFACE: Pavement Curb & Gutter Sidewalks Streetlighting Director Date ---------- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. LOONEY, J1;L9 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: JUNE 279 1994 SUBJECT: ZBA-18-V-949 JOHN AND LUCINDA POUPLIKOLLAS LOCATION: 1505 BARBERRY LANE The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for a variation at 1505 Barberry Lane. Specifically, the applicants are seeking a variation to allow a minimum sideyard setback of 5 feet instead of the required 9.5 feet to allow an attached garage addition. The request was reviewed at the regular Zoning Board of Appeals meetings of May 26 and June 23, 1994. At the meetings, ?&s. Pouplikollas presented the request. She indicated that the garage addition is needed in order to park a commercial vehicle in the garage. She stated that the variation is needed because the lot is pie -shaped and that the garage will have a 12 foot setback at the building line. Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report. Mr. Forsythe indicated that the petitioners are attempting to resolve a zoning violation which prohibits parking a commercial vehicle on a driveway in a residential zoning district. The existing garage is not large enough to store the truck. At the meeting of May 26, the members reviewed the architectural plans for the request. The members continued the request in order for the petitioner to complete the building plans and discuss the request with the neighbors. At the June 23 meeting, Mrs. Pouplikollas discussed the renderings of the garage addition. She also indicated that she was unable to garner support for her request from surrounding neighbors. Several neighbors indicated that they were opposed to the request. They feel that this type of use is not conducive to a residential area. They also feel that the proposed addition is not in character with the neighborhood. By a vote of 4-3, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denial of the request to allow a 5 foot sideyard setback. WJC:hg TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, "kNGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPkr MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOT.1 A AD wl t NC `� (.o) IN BOX MEANS THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN BUILf)INC3 t INES ANI) FAI;FMFNTq &Q9 CZwnwN masiv isrucoc Tw I -%, . --- � t M MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-1 8-V-94 Hearing Date: June 23, 1994 PETITIONER: John and Lucinda Pouplikollas SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1505 Barberry Lane PUBLICATION DATE: May 10* 1994 REQUEST: The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section 14.905.13.1 to allow a minimum sideyard setback of 5 feet instead of the required 9.5 feet to allow an attached garage addition. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxem Jack Verhasselt ABSENT None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Mr. Jerry Rozek Mr. Al Chovanec Mr. Sid Drain Ms. Suzanne Baler Chairman Basnik introduced case ZBA-1 8-V-94 being a request to allow a minimum sideyard setback of 5 feet instead of the required 9.5 feet to allow an attached garage addition. This case was continued from the May 269 1994 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Mrs. Lucinda Pouplikollas introduced herself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that they would like to build an addition to the existing garage to house a commercial vehicle which is currently In their driveway. Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that prior to purchasing this house she had checked on the ordinance with regards to parking a commercial vehicle in her driveway and was informed that she could indeed park in her driveway. However,, after she moved in, she was told that the vehicle had to be garaged. Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that she is trying her best to accomodate the Village by adding this garage. She had the builder make up two drawings of the proposed garage and has shown drawings to the neighbors. The garage will be white aluminum siding to match the house and feels the garage is suitable to the neighborhood and that the variation is a reasonable request. Per Chairman Basnik's request, Mrs. Pouplikollas then presented to the Board a picture of the commercial vehicle. Mr. Jerry Rozek, 1409 Barberry Lane, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals as a neighbor of the petitioner. Mr. Rozek stated that Mrs. Pouplikollas showed him a drawing of the ZBA-1 8-V-94 Page 2 proposed garage and while she has done a fine job trying to accomodate the Village code, he feels that the proposed garage will not enhance the house or neighborhood. Mr. Rozek stated that it is a very large commercial vehicle which does not belong in a residential neighborhood. Mr. Al Chovanec, 1112 Sycamore, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Chovanec asked if a commercial vehicle can be housed In a residential neighborhood. In response, Village Planner, Ray Forsythe stated that the ordinance allows a commercial vehicle up to 8,000 lbs to be housed in a residential neighborhood. Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that her vehicle weighs 5,600 lbs. Mr. Chovanec stated that he is a 32 yr. resident and is very concerned about neighborhood needs and feels the proposed addition would lower neighborhood values. Mr. Sid Drain, 1114 N. Sycamore, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Drain showed the Board a Plat of Survey of his property. He stated that the houses run on an angle and that it is very crowded in the back of the property and if the proposed garage is added he could look out his living room window and'5 feet away will be the garage. Mr. Cassidy asked Mr. Drain if he felt the proposed addition would detract from his house value and Mr. Drain said that he felt it would. Chairman Basnik inquired about the garage door height. Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that it would be 11 feet. Ms. Suzanne Baler, 1504 Cedar Lane, introduced herself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Ms. Baler stated that her property backs up to the subject property. She raised concerns with the height of the building and door and stated that the drawing shows the house and garage with 2 different size peaked roofs. Ms. Baler stated that she is not against the neighbors, but she feels that the proposed building would be detramental to the neighborhood and they should seek an aftemative solution with regards to parking the commercial vehicle. In closing remarks, Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that she has gone to great lengths to accomodate the Village and neighborhood needs. She is not sure what exactly the complaint Is against her. Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that she called the Village prior to moving in and was informed that she could park the vehicle in the driveway and when she moved was informed that the vehicle had to be garaged. She feels she has done the best she could do under the circumstances. Mr. Brettrager asked staff how the Village defines the weight rating on the truck. Planner,, Ray Forsythe stated that it is determined by the licensed weight exceeding 8,000 lbs (gross weight). Mr. Lannon asked staff about Mrs. Pouplikollas! Inquiries prior to moving in. Mr. Forsythe explained that a police officer with the Village did speak with Mrs. Pouplikollas. and Informed her that she could park her commercial vehicle in the driveway according to his interpretation of the Village Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the proposed request. Mr. Cassidy then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation to Section 14.905.B.1 to allow a minimum sideyard setback of 5 feet instead of the required 9.5 feet to allow an attached garage addition as shown in petitioners exhibit 1. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lannon. ZBA-18444 Page 3 Upon Roll Cali: AYES.: Floms,,La,nnon,, Luxem NAY S.: Basnik, Bteftrager,,, Cassl3dy, VOrt, asseft, The Imption was denivote of,4-3. Resj*Wulty,sub, 'Medf Julle Ain Souris SecretarY MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-1 84-94 Hearing Date: May 28, 1994 PETITIONER: John and Lucinda Pouplikollas SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1505 Barberry Lane PUBLICATION DATE: May 101 1994 REQUEST: The petitioner Is seeking a variation to Section 14.905.8.1 to allow a minimum sideyard setback of 5 feet Instead of the required 9.5 feet to allow an attached garage addition. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxem Jack Verhasselt ABSENT None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Mr. Jerry Rozek Chairman Basnik introduced case ZBA-1 8-V-94 being a request to allow a minimum sideyard setback of 5 feet instead of the required 9.5 feet to allow an attached garage addition. Mrs. Lucinda Pouplikollas introduced herself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that they would like to build an addition to, the existing garage to house a commercial vehicle which is currently In their driveway. Ms. Pouplikollas said she and her family moved to Mount Prospect less than a year ago and prior to moving she had called the Village to inquire about parking a commercial vehicle in the driveway. She had spoken to Officer Roscop and he told her that there wasn't any ordinance against the size of commercial vehicle she had with regards to parking it in her driveway. This information was given to her in July of last year. However,, in October,, the ordinance was changed. Therefore, she is requesting an addition to house the vehicle. Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. He stated the petitioners are attempting to resolve an outstanding violation of parking a commercial vehicle on a driveway instead of off site or in a garage. The proposed garage will have a door height of 10 feet instead of the ordinance allowed 8 foot which would require an amendment from the Village Manager to allow a variation to the building code. Mr. Forsythe further stated the garage the petitioners are proposing to attach to their exising 2 car garage will have a sideyard setback of 5 feet instead of the required minimum 9.5 feet. Mr. Lannon asked if the Police Department remembers receiving the call from Mrs. Pouplikollas. Mr. Forsythe stated that they had. However he was not involved with the call and feels the ordinance -might have been misinterpreted to the petitioner with regards to parking the commercial vehicle in the driveway. Mr. Lannon wondered if this could be a pre-existing use. ZBA- 1 8-V-94 Page 2 Mr. Forsythe stated that this vehicle should never have been permitted in the driveway. It is a plain white box vehicle under 8,000 pounds. Chairman Basnik read a letter to the Zoning Board of Appeals from several neighbors (34 families) with regards to this case. The letter stated that they want no ill feelings with their new neighbor,, however, they do not want a commercial vehicle in their neighborhood. Mr. Jerry Rozek, 1409 Barberry Lane, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals at a neighbor of the petitioner. Mr. Rozek stated that he wanted to be on record as an objector to the proposed addition. He does not want a commercial vehicle of this nature in the neighborhood and stated that it blocks the view on the comer. Mr. Rozek feels the proposed garage size is not proportionate to the rest of the neighborhood. In response, Mrs. Pouplikollas stated she understands the concerns regarding the traffic view. This is why she would like to get the vehicle off the driveway and into a garage. She stated that it is a plain white (no lettering) flat nose truck approximately 20 feet In length. Mr. Floros asked what type of business they have. Mrs. Pouplikollas stated that her husband delivers to restaurants. Mrs. Poulikollas further stated that she does want the garage to look nice. The house and garage roof would conform and it would be a brick construction. She further noted that they have no plans to widen the driveway. Mr. Lannon then read from the previous Zoning Ordinance and can understand how it could be misinterpreted. The board generally discussed the request. Chairman Basnik asked how this all came about. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff received complaints with regards to the commercial vehicle and found It to be In violation of the ordinance. Mr. Breftrager asked to see architectural drawings. The petitioner did not have any at this time. Mr. Michael Higgins, Pierce Builders, 300 E. North Ave., Villa Park, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Higgins stated that the petitioner called his business and stated that they would like to build an attached garage to house a commercial vehicle. He further stated that he did not have elevation drawings at this time however he would bring them to the next meeting. Mr. Rozek then asked if the vehicle will continue to be parked In the driveway. Mrs. Pouplikollas said it would but R will be moved further up the drive to help with the view. Chairman Basnik suggested to Mrs. Pouplikollas to discuss the proposed garage with the neighbors. This case was then continued to the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of June 23, 1994. Respectful submitted, Ie Ann Bouris Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOA" OF APPEALS GEL BASNM CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY P. FO' SYTHE9 PLANNE4A)AA DATE, MAY 179 1994 CASE NO.: ZBA-18-V-94 APPLICANT. JOHN AND LUCINDA POUPLIKO'11AS ADDRESS: 1505 BARBERRY LANE LOCATION MAP: C C ucuo a 1206 1205 go 1 0 1 0 rq 8 04 'w 11202 12©4 1203, v V 1200 202 1201 NARIEffirf LN I- P1 "IVA 112 CEDAR 0 0 0 0 1110 1135 11109 0 Oki 4* 0 0- 0 11106,, 1108 I I I 1106 1129 DMW000 LN — 1 1 104 1105 0 a 0 "104 t 1 1125 1102 1 02 1103 �.A a 0 010 --1102 0 N '* 0 16 0 0 0 1 100 .2 GREENWOOD 00 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING, R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 8,646 sq. ft. %COVERAGE: Current-, 33'0/9; Proposed: 36% Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section 14.905.B.1 to allow a mininum, sideyard setback of 5 feet instead of the required 9.5 feet to allow an attached garage addition. Summary of Application: The application indicates that the petitioners purchased the home in July of 1993 and inquired with the Village in regards to the commercial vehicle. Because the Ordinance now requires the vehicle to be parked in a garage, an addition is requested. The site plan indicates a setback of 5 feet at the narrowest point with a 12 foot setback at the front of the proposed garage. Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioners are attempting to resolve a current violation to the Zoning Ordinance of parking a commercial vehicle on a driveway instead of a garage. Because of the height of the vehicle, the existing garage is not usable. The proposed garage will have a door height of 10 feet versus the typical 8 foot. The Ordinance limits the height of detached garages to 12 feet which would not allow this type of construction. Because the garage is attached to the house, the height requirement can be obtained. The addition will be required to meet all applicable Budding Code issues. The height of the door will need to be approved by the Village Manager as a modification to the Building Code. The subject property is a "pie -shaped" lot with a width of 112.65 feet at the front property line (95 ft. at the 30 ft. building line) and 23.72 feet at the rear property line. Because of the lot shape, there would be approximately 10 feet with a sideyard setback of 5 feet with a 12 foot setback at the front of the garage. The Home Oca4mtion Ordinance was developed to accommodate persons to work out of the home in occupations which will c*ause little impact to the surrounding area. This request is needed to house a vehicle which is under 8,,000 Ibs., however, the height limits the ability to park in a standard garage. The Ordinance permits an attached three -car garage, however, this request reduces the sideyard setback from the required 9.5 feet to 5 feet. See attached comments. The petitioners are requesting a variation to the required sideyard setback from 9.5 feet to 5 feet in order to construct an addition to the existing attached garage in order to park a commercial vehicle in the garage. Staff is concerned with creating the need for the variation to resolve the complaint with the commercial vehicle. Because the hardship is self-imposed, staff would recommend denial. R L PUBLIC EMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED: ........... NO a. Underground Utilities Water ............... Sanitary Sewer .......... Storm Sewer , . - - ...... b. Surface Improvement Pavement ............. Curb & Gutter .......... Sidewalks .......... Street Lighting ....... c. Easements Utility & Drainage Access ................ 2. PERMITS REQUIRED OTHER THAN VILLAGE.* a. MWRDGC b. IDOT c. ARMY CORP d. TEPA e. CCHD f OTHER CASE NO. ZRA-2-Lv. , (' y 11 NQ 3. R.O.W. DEDICATIONS? ........... x 4. SITE PLAN ACCEPTABLE? X- kie>sHiP rgoe- 8Ae-K-j1\J6 "7 Vs 5. PRELMUNARY PLAT ACCEPTABLE? ..... Q, VAJ 6 6. TRAFFIC STUDY ACCEPTABLE? 7. STORM WATER DETENTION REQUIRED ... 8. FLOOD PLAIN OR FLOODWAY E)ISTING? . �JA 9. ATTLAND EXISTING? ................... GENERAL COMMENTS: Ti4r- \/JLt-,,q6C- UJI"cA�j IT,,q-p / Sz64)e-7(Aj M 44 Ce&e :r D 4) IF T. 5 Aj 0r .4 y 90 14 D ' 7 -Hi, &ASEME&) 4ge4 r-�74 AJ— PLANS PREPARED BY- vo!",r7 DATE OF PLANS: Engineering Coordinator Date CASE NO. I. NUMBER OF STORIES ...... . .. . . 2. HEIGHT OF BUILDING .......... . 3. FIRE LANES ....... 4. FIRE HYDRANTS .......... �..... , 5. STANDPIPE.. , ....... ........ . b. SPRINKLERS .............. . 7. FIRE PUMP ..... . 4 . A . 0 0 w 0 8. FIRE ALARM ....—.............. . 9. DO ANY EMSTING OR PROPOSED/FIRE LANES ALLOW ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR EMEERGENCY VEHICLES? 14. IS THERE ANY TYPE OF STORAGE PLANNED THAT EXCEED 12 FEET IN HEIGHT'' I I . IS THERE ANY TYPE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COMBUSTIBLE OR FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS TO BE STORED OR USED IN ANY PROCESS AT THE PROPOSES SITE (INSIDE OR OUTSIDE)? 12. ANY UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS ON SITE NOW OR PROPOSED? 13. GENERAL CONEAENTS Aiffrw _ Date 011 CASE NO. ZBA-- 7 - POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1. CHARACTER OF USE: (WOULD IT BE A PROBLEM TYPE?) ND 2. ARE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS ADEQUATE? 3. PRESENT TRAFFIC PROBLEMS? - /U6 4. TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AT PARTICULAR LOCATION: Nfrq 5. TRAFFIC PROBLEMS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT: 3. GENERAL COMMENTS: G U co 6 /o Ex Fll�kl^ 4 �� � ct eX VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS9 VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WILL UM J. COONEYt JR., DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: JUNE 279 1994 SUBJECT: ZBA-24-V-94, LARRY MC KONE LOCATION: 20 NORTH MARCELLA ROAD The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for a variation at 20 North Marcella. Specifically, the applicants are seeking to construct a circulw driveway which results in a front yard lot coverage of 45% instead of the rmucirnumi allowed 35%. The request was reviewed at the regular Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of June 23, 1994. At the meeting, Mr. Larry McKone presented the request. Mr. McKone indicated that he is budding the home at 20 North Marcella and the buyers of the property would like to add a circular driveway. He indicated that the driveway will be constructed of paver bricks. Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report. He indicated that typically circular driveways are requested on arterial or collector streets where it is difficult to back out onto the streets. He fiuther stated that the ordinance would allow a 26 foot wide driveway which is sufficient to provide parking on a turn -around. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. The majority of the Board stated that they did not have a problem with the request for a circular drive but did not support the request for the lot coverage variation. It was agreed that if IW McKone could meet the lot coverage requirement, the Board could support the circular drive. Mr. McKone stated that he could design the drive to meet the lot coverage requirement. By a vote of 5-2, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the request conditioned 4 upon the petitioners desiIi the driveway in conformance with lot coverage requtrements. gnIng WJC:hg = i Plat oj'Survey LOT I BV ESTAM- � MMOUNT, `' FC_ GA RESUMMMONfiV wor 1 114 OF _ 5 GF 1 r EAST CW UZ TlMillq b FRLYCWAL NEIL+, , � 1N COOK COCINIY IIlj1VQIS. 3 152.26 S FT EASEMFNr _ puaAlc urttlrlF!A -_ --� A4 I -- Pa fi R '0 2 STORYR ICK 4 Q 6 RESIOENCE WITH E tti LOT torr EA t� FOR F B jc n - G Zt $4.83 Fr _ EA s E M E NT cam P*AIBLlc urrrrrrfs x t1aA' JYtsi 2 G6m o _ � cl -) ot am MFAHS rms *i" SIRS _ u 10W Aft T ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-24-V-94 Hearing Date: June 23, 1994 PETITIONER: Larry McKone SUBJECT PROPERTY. 20 North Marcella Road PUBLICATION DATE: June 8, 1994 REQUEST: The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section 14.2215 to allow a circular driveway which results In a front yard lot coverage of 45% instead of the maximum allowed 35%. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxem Jack Verhasselt ABSENT: None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced the case ZBA-24-V-94 being a request for a variation to Section 14.2215 to allow a circular driveway which results In a front yard lot coverage of 45% Instead of the maximum allowed 356. Mr. Larry McKone, President, Gettysburg Development Corporation, 422 Parkview Ct., Arlington Heights, Illinois, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. McKone stated that his company would like to install a U -shape driveway in front of his clients home which he is presently building. The driveway would consist of decorative paver bricks. Mr. McKone further stated that he feels that there is a safety hardship in this case and noted that the police concur that pulling out of a driveway would be safer than backing out. The new owners have 3 cars and feel a U -shape driveway would best serve their needs. Mr. Cassidy asked what type of house he was building. Mr. McKone stated that it will be a 2 story house approximately 3,500 square feet with a 2 car garage. The house will be 56 feet wide. Mr. Brettrager stated that with these types of houses the builder should plan ahead and allow more front yard space to accomodate the lot coverage requirements should the new owners want a U' -shape driveway. Mr. Mckone stated that they place the houses in a close proximity and try to utilize as much space as possible. Planner, Ray Forsythe stated that the application indicates that the circular driveway is requested to provide off-street parking as well as the ability to pull out of the driveway instead of backing out. Circular driveways are permitted in the Zoning Ordinance only with a variation. Typically, circular driveways have been requested on arterial or collector streets where it is a hardship backing out into traffic. The Zoning Ordinance would allow a driveway up to 26 feet in width ZBA-24.1/•94 Page 2 which would be sufficient to allow for adequate off-street parking or a tum -around to provide for the ability to drive onto the street instead of backing out. The Board generalty discussed the request. Mr. McKone stated that he would consider cutting the driveway space from 12 feet to 10 feet and narrow the radius on the curve to come up with a 35% lot coverage if the Board would allow a circular driveway. The Board generally felt that the U -shape driveway would be fine if it meets 35% lot coverage instead of the proposed 45%. They felt that the front yard shouldn't contain excessive amounts of impervious surface. Mr. Brettrager then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation to Section 14.2215 to allow a circular driveway on the subject property as shown on petitioners exhibit 1 to include a landscape plan with the front yard coverage not to exceed 35%. The motion was seconded by Mr. Verhasselt. Upon Roll Gall: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Lux,em, Verhasselt NAYS: Basnik, Floras w The motion was approved by a vote of 5-. Chairman Basnik noted the reason he voted no was that he felt no hardship was present. Respectfully submitted, Julie Ann Souris Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Blinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIIK, CHAHUSIAN FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE9 PLANNER DATE: 13,11994 CASE NO.: ZBA-24-V-94 APPLICANT: LARRY MC KONE ADDRESS: 20 NORTH MARCELLA ROAD LOCATION MAP: E TKAYER ST 6 127 126 EMWERS0,11 E c) - 133 124 125 124 130 1,31 107 121 129 128 V5 127 120 121 126 E NEmay sT *03 117 21 20 15 101 17 17 14 It log�0 10 9 7 8 X 7 6 ici GREEN 2 3 201 6 127 126 EMWERS0,11 133 124 125 124 E12 3 1,31 -- — 121 129 122 123 122 119 127 120 121 125 E NEmay sT 117 21 15 19 17 log�0 ,07 7 ici GREEN 3 E CENTRAL 40 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 13,036 sq. ft. %COVERAGE: 27% proposed; front yard 45% proposed Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section 14.2215 to allow a circular driveway which results in a front yard lot coverage of 45% instead of the maximum allowed 35%. 11�� 11111q�1111 11111111111� � 11111111111 11111111q Summary of Application: The application indicates that the circular driveway is requested to provide off-street parking as well as the ability to puff out of the driveway instead of backing out. Impact on Surrounding Properties: Circular driveways are permitted in the Zoning Ordinance only with a variation. Typically, circular driveways have been requested on arterial or collector streets where it is often difficult or hazardous to back out into traffic. The subject property is on Marcella which is not a collector or arterial street so backing out onto the street should not be a problem. The recently amended Zoning Ordinance would allow a driveway up to 26 feet in width. This would be sufficient to allow for adequate off-street parking or a turn -around to provide for the ability to drive onto the street instead of backing out. Staff would note that the property to the north, as well as a lot on Westgate to the west contain circular drives. 11 � �ITV 11JI 17`11`� 111 11 1 111, 1 10117A." I ' 11 31 Engineering noted that there is a utility easement along the front of this property which is maintained by the Village. The petitioners are seeking to add a circular driveway to a new house. The petitioners have not provided an adequate hardship on this request, therefore staff would recommend denial. Fr72 CASE NO. ZBA 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED......... NO a. Underground Utilities, Water .................. Sanitary Sewer .......... Storm Sewer ......... b. Surface Improvement Pavement ............. Curb & Gutter ........... Sidewalks ............... x Street Lighting .......... c. Easements Utility & Drainage x Access 2. PTR NTS REQUIRED OTHER THAN VILLAGE: a. MWRDG-C b. IDOT c. ARMY CORP d. EEPA e. CCHD f OTHER Co$�� s 3. R. 0. W. DEDICATIONS? 4. SITE PLAN ACCEPTABLE? 5. PRELMUNARY PLAT ACCEPTABLE? ..... 6. TRAFFIC STUDY ACCEPTABLE? .......... IVA 7. STORM WATER DETENTION REQUIRED. - 8. FLOOD PLAIN OR FLOODWAY EXISTING? . X- 9. WETLAND EXISTING? ................... GENERAL COMNIENTS.- C—Aj & jAJ &-F,)ejoNJG d M '. i5x'. 5 t t)o G S� /A P Pf-,A 12�-, Te)CAUSC' t) RA),,AJA PLANS PREPARED BY: ......... . . . . . . DATE OF PLANS: Engineering Coordinator G,t.3 Date 3 CASE NO. ZBA o 1. NUMBER OF STORIES ............ 2. HEIGHT OF BUILDING 3. FIRE LANES ..... ... ......... . 4. FIRE HYDRANTS ...., ...., ... 5. STANDPIPE... 6. SPRINKLERS .... ............ .. . 7. FIRE PUNT ... ............. w ... . 8. FIRE ALARM .................... 9, DO ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED/FIRE LANES ALLOW ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES" 10. IS THERE ANY TYPE OF STORAGE PLANNED THAT EXCEED 12 FEET IN HEIGHT?.. 11. IS THERE ANY TYPE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COMBUSTIBLE OR FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS TO BE STORED OR USED IN ANY PROCESS AT THE PROPOSES SIM {INSIDE OR OUTSIDE}? 12. ANY UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS ON SITE NOW OR PROPOSED? 13. GENERAL COMIvvIENTS: ipir or Date Eli CASE NO. ZBA.2-- ,---(?q I VARIATIONS NEEDED FROM VILLAGE BUILDING CODE (See below) P. X , MEETS HEALTIVSAFETY CODE REQUM04ENTS 1.) No fill shall be placed along property lines. 2.) Drainage patterns in side and rear yard shall not be altered. 4 Director - -------- - -- - bi t e k, CASE NO. ZBA24-, V-q,y POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1, CHARACTER OF USE:" (WOULD IT BEA PROBLEM TYPE?) 2. ARE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS ADEQUATE? NlA 3. PRESENT TRAFFIC PROBLEMS? 4. TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AT PARTICULAR LOCATION: tiff 5. TRAFFIC PROBLEMS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT: 3. GENERAL COMNffiNTS- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect Illinois P) TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS9 VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, JR., DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: JUNE 27,11994 SUBJECT: ZBA-25-V-94, SIGMOND SWARSIG LOCATION: 703 WEST MILBURN The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for a variation at 703 West MIburn. Specifically, the applicants are seeking to construct a shed on an existing slab with a 2 foot setback instead of the minimum 5 feet. The request was reviewed at the regular Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of June 23, 1994. At the meeting., Mr. Swarski presented the request. He indicated that he had a shed for more than 40 years in this location. He indicated that run-off from the neighbor's garage caused his shed to deteriorate. He stated that the cost of removing the concrete would be prohibitive and he feels that the concrete is in good shape. Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report. He indicated that the ordinance requires a 5 foot setback and the homeowner has a sufficient yard to provide the required setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. Several Board members stated that they believed the shed would not detract from the neighborhood and that it would be a hardship to require the concrete pad to be removed. By a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the request. 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-25-V-94 Hearing Date: June 23, 1994 PETITIONER: Sigmond warski SUBJECT PROPERTY: 703 West Milburn PUBLICATION DATE: June 8, 1994 REQUEST: The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section 14.306.8.1 to allow a shed to be located two (2) feet from the interior side property line instead of the minimum 5 feet. MEMBER PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik,, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floras Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxem Jack Verhasselt ABSENT: None OBJECTORWINTERESTEED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced the case ZBA-25-V-94, being a request for a variation to Section 14.30.8.1 to allow a shed to be located two (2) feet from the interior side property line instead of the minimum 5 feet.0 Mr. Swarski, 703 West Milburn, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Swarski stated that he would like to replace a shed that he put up 41 years ago. The neighbors to the west have their driveway and roof pitched toward his property and he feels from this extra drainage he received over the past 41 years it has helped to ,deteriorate his shed. Mr. Swarski stated that he removed his shed during spring clean-up and now would like to replace it in the same location. The concrete slab which was under the shed is in perfect condition. He proposes to put up a 14'-5" x 6' shed (approximately 85 square feet). Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Forsythe further stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 5 feet for sheds on lots 65 feet in width. Mr. Swarski feels that it is a financial hardship to move the shed to another location seeing that the concrete slab is in good condition. Mr. Forsthe noted that the lot size is significant to allow a shed to meet the 5 foot setback. Planning Director, Bill Cooney, addressed the Board and read the code standards with regards to hardship. They are as follows: 1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations was to be applied; 2. The conditions upon which an application for a variation are based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other property within ZBA-25-V 94 Page 2 the same zoning classification, 3. The purpose of the variation Is not based primarily upon a desire to increase financial gain; 4. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property; S. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; 6. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and 7. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of tight and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage or create drainage problems :on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Mr. Cooney stated that a hardship is for the property itself and must meet this criteria. The Board generally discussed the proposed variation. Mr. Floras asked Mr. Swarskl if the new shed would be the same size and Mr. Swarski said that it would be approximately the size of the old one. Mr. Cassidy then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation to Section 14.306.B.1 to allow a shed to be located two (2) feet from the interior side property line instead of the minimum 5 feet as shown on petitioners exhibit 1. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Doll Call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Cassidy, Floros, Lannon, Luxem,'Verhasselt NAYS: Mone The motion was approved by a vote of ?•o. Respectfulf, tubmifted, Julie Ann Souris Secretary w FROM: DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT, ADDRESS: LOCATION MAP. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GEL BASMIC9 CHAIRMAN RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNERF410 JUNE 139 1994 ZBA-25-V-94 SIGMOND SWARSIU 703 WEST MIULBURN DRESSER OR 209 4 213 7 215 217 219 305 307 3,09 PROPERTY DESCRIMON: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 8,450 sq. ft. %COVERAGE: 25% Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section I4.30►6.B. I to allow a shed to be located two (2) feet from the interior side property fine instead of the minimum 5 feet. Jill '111- W 4, IM111" MINT1 Summary of Application: The application indicates that there is an existing slab which is located 2 feet from the side property fine which previously held a shed. It is indicated that the slab is in good shape and would be costly to remove. Impact on Surrounding Properties: The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 5 feet from accessory structures on lots 65 feet in width. The petitioner has sufficient room on his property to construct the shed with the minimum 5 foot setback. Staff would recommend a 5 foot setback to make the situation conforming to the standards established in the Zoning Ordinance. Engineering has indicated that there does not appear to be an existing drainage problem. SUM i RY/-R—E CQ_W.4ENDA,11.QN, The petitioner is requesting to construct a shed on an existing slab with a 2 foot setback. The petitioner has not indicated a hardship and therefore, staff would recommend denial. RFP:hg �/ /rJ/�46v4�2N qVE. E-2 7-106 CASE NO. ZBA ENGINEERING DIVISION COMEN I 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED: ........... a. Underground Utilities - Water ................. Sanitary Sewer .......... Storm Sewer ........... b. Surface Improvement Pavement .............. Curb & Gutter .......... Sidewalks ............... Street Lighting .......... c. Easements Utility & Drainage ....... Access .............. 2. PERMITS REQUIRED OTHER THAN VILLAGE: a. MWRDGC b. IDOT c. ARMY CORP d. TEPA e. CCHD 'I f OTHER NQ COMMENTS 3. R.O.W. DEDICATIONS? .................. 4. SITE PLAN ACCEPTABLE? ............... I A 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT ACCEPTABLE? N 6. TRAFFIC STUDY ACCEPTABLE -7 .......... . 7. STORM WATER DETENTION REQUIRED.. 8. FLOOD PLAIN OR FLOODWAY EXISTING? 9. WETLAND EXISTING? ................... Y GENERAL COMMENTS- IF:: W4,LIG tA-)AY 157-6; 6e, 0J57 -14& -6Z) Tv P 4, D 47- C=, 9A �JVLl L el> -1 `rCz, L PLANS PREPARED BY: -bate DATE OF PLANS: Engineering Coordinator b -1c -i�l K a 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ii. 12. m CASE NO. ZBA�',,�,we NUMBER OF STORIES HEIGHT OF BUILDING FIRE LANES FIRE HYDRANTS ........... STANDPIPE FIREPUNT FIRE ALARM .................... DO ANY OUSTING OR PROPOSED/FIRE LANES ALLOW ADEQUATE ACCESS FOR EMERGENCY VEMCLES?---- IS THERE ANY TYPE OF STORAGE PLANNED THAT EXCEED 12 FEET IN HEIGHVL� IS THERE ANY TYPE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, COM33USTEBLE OR FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS TO BE STORED OR USED IN ANY PROCESS AT THE PROPOSES SITE (INSIDE OR OUTSIDE)? ANY UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS ON SITE NOW OR PROPOSED? GENERAL COMMENTS: Direct Date CASE NO. ZBAq�, n INSPECTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS YE N -Q 1. X VARIATIONS NEEDED FROM VILLAGE BUILDING CODE (See below) 2. X MEETS HEALTIUSAFETY CODE REQUIREMENTS COMMENI& 1.) No fill shall be placed in rear or side yards. 2.) Existing drainage patterns along side and rear yard shall not be altered. 6/14/94 Director Date CASE NO. ZBAQLF- POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMENTS 1. CHARACTER OF USE: (WOULD IT BE A PROBLEM TYPE?) 2. ARE LIGHTING REQUREMENTS ADEQUATE? 3. PRESENT TRAFFIC PROBLEMS? 4. TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS AT PARTICULAR LOCATION: 1-111,04 5. TRAFFIC PROBLEMS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY THE DEVELOPMENT: 3. GENERAL, COMMENTS: 78/9 irector Date VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois '044 - ----------------- TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY9 JR., DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: JUNE 279 1994 SUBJECT: ZBA-28-V-94, KATHLEEN PANTOL LOCATION: 1418 EAST EMMERSON LANE The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for a variation at 1418 East Emmerson Lane. Specifically, the applicants are seeking to construct a 14'x 16' shed on a concrete base of 16'x 18'(288 sq. ft.). The request was reviewed at the regular Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of June 23, 1994. At the meeting, Kathleen Pantol presented the request. Ms. Pantol indicated the shed is needed to store lawn, pool and patio equipment. She also indicated the lot size is sufficient to accommodate a shed of this size. Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report. A variation is required to permit a shed exceeding 120 square feet. The Board asked Ms. Pantol if she would agree to reduce the shed to 12' x 14' (168 square feet) and the concrete base to 14'x 16 (224 square feet). Ms. Pantol stated that although she would prefer the shed that she had proposed, she would be willing to accept the compromise. The Zoning Board of Appeals members discussed the request. The general consensus was that the compromise proposal was acceptable. By a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the amended request to allow a 12' x 14' shed and a 14' x 16' concrete base. WJC:hg .oma a i )04117 4 � Wi• uv w. � n tK w m 5 'ry I�.. ry� � � �,,,,«�., ru• Iv e w x iw w ro�mo- w a �� m t I , µ way � .adw: :yu w s aM x x m w wLA. 010��. -w w t b, olu w a wol.: y Ai E 9 Al' Q 7S j, L.a r o F (2-->L. tw4r t46 x 'IL- e ,F 1- �;OL r t PA-e 4- Ln ci► i k1NA:1 Les, ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-28-V-94 Hearing Date: June 23, 1994 PETITIONER: Kathleen Pantol SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1418 East Emmerson Lane PUBLICATION DATE: June 8, 1994 REQUEST: The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section 14.306.13.1 to allow a 288 sq. ft. shed instead of the maximum allowed 120 square feet. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettiager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxem Jack Verhasselt ABSENT: None OBJECTORWINTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced the case ZBA-28-V-94, being a request for a variation to Section 14.306.13.1 to allow a 288 square foot shed instead of the maximum allowed 120 square feet. Ms. Kathleen Pantol, 1418 East Emmerson Lane, introduced herself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Ms. Pantol explained that she would like to replace her 10'x 10' shed with a 14' x 1W shed on a concrete slab 16'x 18'. This would give her a 28% lot coverage. She stated that she has a pool and would like additional storage for pool supplies and lawn furniture. Ms. Pantol stated that her next door neighbor has a shed approximately the same size. Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Forsythe stated that the Zoning Ordinance sets a maximum size of a shed at 120 square feet. The petitioner is requesting a shed and base of 288 square feet. The lot coverage will be 28% which is below the maximum allowed 45%. Mr. Forsythe further stated that there have been similar requests granted in Mount Prospect on lots which exceed the minimum R•1 Single Family standard of 8,125 square feet. Mr. Brettrager asked staff if she could put up two 120 square feet sheds. Mr. Forsythe stated that Ms. Pantol does have a pool on the property and she is limited to two accessory structures. Ms. Pantol stated that she has an aluminum prefab shed with a plywood bottom. The new proposed shed will have a concrete bottom. The Board generally discussed the size of the shed along with Ms. Pantol and they agreed to a 12' x 14' shed on a 141 x 16' pad. Mr. Cassidy then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation to Section 14.306.8.1 to allow a 168 sq. ft. shed instead of the maximum allowed 120 square feet to sit up" nc!,x 160 (224 sq. ft)asthown inpetitioners exhibilt, 1. Mr. Verhasseft. seconded the motlon.,, Upon Roll Call'o. AYES,,.,, SAtnilk,''B I mftraget. Cassidly, Floms, 'Lannan, .1 em,, NAYS: None 'The oration w0sappmved by a vote, of, 7-0� Resy', I bm,ft-tedl, pectful I I le� JUDeAnn , B'durls Se cretary K VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT adui PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL, BASNE, CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNED DATE: JUNE 289 1994 CASE NO.: ZBA-28-V-94 APPLICANT: KATHLEENPANTOL ADDRESS: 1418 EAST EMMERSON LANE LOCATION MAP: E TMAYER ST 123 120 -- h 121 118 i n � n n 0 rt 114 11 1 cy Na20 112 117 114 MARK OR 1419 1422 ftp 1 115_ 112 too 0- 421 1424; 108 113 110 1423 W 1426 108 1 1 1 108 105 N 1425 w 1428 104 149 106 105 n �w ,.• 1427 14310 102 107 104 a 1432 105 3 1001 103 1' +- It 30 Nit E EMERSON W Ob3 ;*I 10 ••' ••• N N I N' N I } *0 3 � 9 ,�, V irr p ReiEN t� 5 6 5 3 2 1 4 31 2 �l E C ENT OAL, 40 PROPERTY DESC ' TION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 14,065 sq. ft. %COVERAGE: Current: 26.7%; Proposed: 28% Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section 14.306.B.1 to allow a 288 sq. ft. shed instead of the ' maximum allowed 120 square feet. I WK, RYK YL J-, I No—�, .. IL ............... ... Summary of Application: The application indicates that the petitioner is seeking to place a 141-AI61 (224 sq. ft.) shed on a concrete base of 16'x18' (2 8 8 sq. ft.) to store lawn, pool and patio equipment. The applicant indicated that the lot size is adequate to support the shed size. Impact on Surrounding Properties: The Zoning Ordinance sets a maximum size of a shed at 120 square feet. The petitioner is requesting a shed and base of 288 square feet. The lot coverage will be approximately 28% which is below the maximum allowed 45%. There have been similar requests granted in Mount Prospect on lots which exceed the minimum R.-1 Single Family standard of 8,125 square feet. Because the request is a variation, a hardship must be established. Staff does not believe the petitioner has an adequate hardship. D`EPA &1MnALQ2MM'EM Inspection Services and Engineering indicate that existing drainage patterns shall be maintained and any future sidewalk to the shed would require a permit. ,a,',M-MARY/RE!Coh.MENDA,1W,K The Zoning Ordinance indicates that variations be granted based on a hardship. Staff does not believe a hardship has been established and would recommend denial. 2"M 10 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Telephone: (708) 253-5675 June 17, 1994 Mrs. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Il 60056 " 06 Enclosed herewith is the Mount Prospect Public Library's Annual Report and Financial Report for the year May 1, 1993 — April 30, 19940 ly ME, a " 71L 1 yn. G Genther Executive Director MGG/mdt Fars=g STATE OF ILLINOIS ss COUNTY OF COOK It CHERYL A. QUINN., Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the Mount Prospect Public Library do hereby certify that the attached documents, to wit: A) Annual Report of the Mount Prospect Public Library, and B) Financial Report of the Library Fund are true and accurate reports and fully reflect the receipts and expenditures of funds by the said Board of Trustees of the Mount Prospect Public Library, and A. that, the unexpended cash and other working funds as of April 30, 1994 were $ 1,182,078.60. B. that, the Gift Fund has a balance as of April 34, 1994 in the amount of $ 61524-64. C. that, the Building Fund has a balance as of April 30, 1994 in the amount of $ 324.580 "WICIAL W S 'M AbrPW 0. TWTW an"= ",ry PUNW, St* of no!--v- I my Commis� DOM 7/1/94 Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 17th day of June, 1994 MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY %%0 CASH RECONCILIATION WITH BANK STATEMENT APRIL 30, 1994 CASH BALANCE PER BANK STATEMENT - MARCH 31, 1994 OUTSTANDING CHECKS - MARCH 31, 1994 ADJUSTED BANK BALANCE ADD: 39,076.52 17,620.03 21,456.49 April 1994 Cash Receipts 33,131.72" Prior Months Checks Outstanding 31,414.13 Transfer from IPTIP 240r000.00 Reimbursed Expenditures 51638.76 310,184.61 DEDUCT: Cash Disbursements during April 1994 Transfer to IPTIP Transfer to Building Fund CASH BALANCE PER BANK STATEMENT - APRIL 30, 1994 OUTSTANDING CHECKS AT APRIL 30, 1994 ADJUSTED BANK BALANCE OTHER WORKING FUNDS: Illinois Public Treasurers' Investment Pool [IPTIP] AVAILABLE FUNDS - APRIL 30, 1994 DEDUCT OUTSTANDING DEBTS: Accounts Payable at April 30, 1994 Accrued Payroll and Benefits - .April 30, 1994 AVAILABLE FUNDS AFTER PAYMENTS OF DEBTS - APRIL 30, 1994 331,641.10 225,628.47 16,871.30 31,966.67 274,466.44 57,174,66 31f414.13 25,760.53 $ 11308,970.13 11308,970.13 $ 1f334,730.66 77,254.06 75,398.00 152,652.06 Ir182r078.60 MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY GIFT FUND APRIL 30, 1994 BALANCE - APRIL 11 1994 7r600-41 ADDITIONS: Interest [The First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect] NOW Account No. 2485061103962 11.13 Friedrichs Funeral Home [Donation] 380.00 TDR Corporation of America 75.00 Mount Prospect Woman's Club [Donation] 100.00 566.13 DEDUCTIONS: Check No. 1058 -- Mount Prospect Public Library General Account [Kiwanis Gift] $ 62.14 Check No. 1059 -- Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc. [Honorarium -Rose Allen and Michael Mulholland] 25.00 Check No. 1060 -- Yellin Tabor Visual Productions [Kiwanis Gift] 16.95 Check No. 1061 -- Baker and Taylor [In memory of Robert Sproul by Arne and Marilyn Nelson] 19.51 Check No. 1062 -- Mount Prospect Public Library General Account [Kiwanis Gift] 69.35 Check No. 1063 -- Threshold Marketing [Kiwanis Gift] 33.95 Check No. 1064 -- Panelight Display Systems [Friends of MPPL Gift] 1,415.00 11641.90 BALANCE - APRIL 30, 1994 61524.64 MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY GIFT FUND APRIL 30, 1994 CASH IN NOW CHECKING ACCOUNT FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF MOUNT PROSPECT NO. 2485061103962 BALANCE - APRIL 30, 1994 FRIEDRICHS FUNERAL HOME, INC. BALANCE AS OF 3/31/94 Deposited April 19, 1994 Purchases made as of 4/30/94 BALANCE AS OF 4/30/94 $ 6,524.64 Page 2 $ 6,524.64 $ 3,360.00 380.00 1,244.27 $ 2,495.73 MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING FUND RESERVE APRIL 30, 1994 BALANCE APRIL 1, 1994 324-58 ADDITIONS: Transfers from General Account April 6, 1994. $ 51000.00 April 12, 1994 21216.14 April 21, 1994 24,750.53 31,966.67 DEDUCTIONS: Check No. 1037 GEAC Computers [Upgrade CLSI] $ 51000.00 Check No. 1038 GEAC Computers [Upgrade CLSI] 2,216.14 Check No. 1039 Executone Information Systems [Upgrade Telephone System] 91366.60 Check No. 1040 Library Planning Associates [Consulting Services] 21425.00 Check No. 1041 Executone Information Systems [Upgrade Telephone System] 91366.60 Check No. 1042 Donahue Tel Com Associates [Upgrade Telephone System] 407.00 Check No. 1043 GEAC Computers [Upgrade CLSI] 63.13 Check No. 1044 Executone Information Systems [Upgrade Telephone System] 3,122.20 31,966.67 BALANCE - APRIL 30, 1994 324.58 CONSISTING OF CASH IN CHECKING ACCOUNT NBD MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. Me 460000194816 $ 324*58 BALANCE - APRIL 30, 1994 324,58 ID lFor ISL Use only) ILLINOIS STATE LIBRARY, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62701-1796 PUBLIC LIBRARY ANNUAL REPORT 1993-1994 Every public library in Illinois is required by law (75 Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) 5/4-10, and elsewhere) to file this annual report with the State Library. The purpose of this report is to obtain and publish data on the resources and services of all Illinois public libraries for use by all concerned. Each library is asked to file this report with its system headquarters AS SOON AS POSSIBLE UPON (AND BY NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER) completion of its fiscal year ending between July 1, 1993, and June 30, 1994. Please complete and return this form promptly. 0 According to legislation enacted in 1993, public library districts have until leptember 1 to fle this report. Q Please do not leave any item blank. Enter "O" if the appropriate entry for an item is zero or "none." Enter *N.A." if an item does not apply to your library. If an exact figure is not available for a particular item,, but it is known that the amount is greater than zero, enter an estimate of the amount. Type your responses or print in black ink. To help prevent mistakes in assembling photocopies of several different libraries" reports, please write the name of your library in the line provided in the right hand margin of pages 1-9. ITDT*kT FE I P ? M L01 Z " 1. Location MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS (Name of the municipality in which the central library is located.) 2. Librarian MARILYN G. GENTHER fritle EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (Give the name of the librarian in the following order: first name, last name. Married women should use their own names, not their husband's first name (e.g., Mary Jones, NOT Mrs. John Jones). .3. Legal name of library MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY 4a. Address: 4b. Mailing address, if different: 10 SOUTH EMERM KREET Number and Street Number and Street or P.O. Box MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Cr City State City State Q 6QQ56-3251 .......... ... Zip Code Plus Four Zip Code Plus Four (If four digit extension is unknown, contact local post office) 4 5. Library telephone: ( 708 253-5675 5 Area Code 6. Library fax telephone number: ( 708 253-0642 Area Code 7. INTERNET address: a. Library Director's e-mail address: 7a b. Automated System Address: 7b 8. Library system, NORTH SUBURBAN L I BRARY SYSTEM '8 9. Type of library (please circle one): City County District Park Town Township Village Other 10. Is your library involved in a contractual arrangement with another library to receive all libraryservices? .............................. ......... ..... Yes No X If yes, list the name(s) of the library(s) with whom you. contract for service 10 93/94 SERVICE OUTLETS AND HOURS 11. Opening and closing hours of the central library for use by the public in a typical week last October (Le.,, a week with no holidays and in which the library was open during its regularly scheduled hours): 9 AM to 10 P,M Friday 9 AM to 10 PM Monday 9 P Tuesday .9, AM to 10 PM Saturday AM to 5 M Wednesday 9 AM to 10 PM Sunday 12 PM to 5 PIM Thursday 9 AM to 11.. PM 11 C"1 12. Total scheduled weekly public service hours for all service outlets: .. 7 12 (i.e., central library, branches and bookmobiles) .......... ............ ..... 8 13. List branches (please attach additional sheets as necessary). Name Address 13 14. Total number of bookmobiles ............... 0 14 15. Total annual attendance in library ........................ 795 9490 1 5 (Report the total number of persons entering the library, including persons attending activities and those persons requiring no staff services. Use an actual annual count, it available; or use an annual estimate calculated from a count taken during a typical week.) REGISTERED BORROWERS Iwo CT 44 16. Total number of resident borrower's cards in force as of the last day of the fiscal year 37 3,418 16 04 "C 17. Non-resident local borrower's cards. (if tax bill method is used to calculate non-resident fee, please indicate T.B.M. in *fee" blank.) Number of family fees paid Family fee (for use of this library) $ 127-00 Number of student fees paid U Student fee (for use of this library) $ 17 18. Total number of non-resident borrower's cards purchased during the past fiscal year 9 18 19. Total amount of fees collected for non-resident borrower's cards in the past fiscal year $ 19143 19 CHILDREN 20. Children's Program Attendance ................... ...... 189216 20 (Report the actual count over the course of a year of the attendance, both adults and children, at programs which have a portion or all of their target market intended for children age 14 and younger.) 21., Children's Holdings .......................................929598 21 (Report the number of children's cataloged items (number of ITEMS, NOT number of titles) plus children's paperbacks and children's cassettes, even if uncataloged. Do NOT include periodicals whether cataloged or uncataloged. A child is defined as persons age 14 and younger.) 22. Children's Materials Budget ...... 78 9000 _22 (Report expenditures for material in all formats which are purchased for use by patrons age 14 and younger.) 6 1� 93/94 RESOURCES OWNED Held at End of Withdrawn Added Held at End Last FY During FY During FY of This FY (a) (b) (c) (d) 23. Number of books 268 269 6,309 179990 279,950 23 (Report number of different physical volumes in your library for which you provide at least minimal access through the library's catalog (on cards, in book form, on microfiche, online, etc.). Include government documents arranged by Su Docs classification. Exclude periodicals and microforms only.) 0 24. Video recordings 4 ,167 48 873 41,992 24 (Report number of copies, of all formats. Include videotapes, videocassettes, and videodiscs. Exclude slides or filmstrips.) 25. Films 7- 0 0 0 0 25 (Report number of copies of motion picture films of all formats and all sizes.) 26. Audio recordings 102404 837 19385 102952 26 (Report number of copies, of all formats. Include phonorecords, tapes, cassettes, compact disks, etc.) 27. Number of periodical titles (magazines and newspapers only) currently received . . . . . . . . 1,195 27 (Exclude duplicates. Include periodicals received by gift subscriptions, in microform, or as government documents.) USE OF RESOURCES (Report for your entire fiscal year) 28. Number of adult materials loaned ................ 410,1616 �28 (Count all adult arW young adult materials borrowed by patrons from your library land any branches, bookmobiles or other agency), including interlibrary loans received from other libraries, bulk loan materials, reciprocal borrowing transactions, and all print and non -print media such as films, records and art prints.) 29. Number of children's materials loaned ............................. 29 (Count all children's materials borrowed by patrons from your library (and any branches, bookmobiles or other agencyl, including interlibrary loans received from other libraries, bulk loan materials, reciprocal borrowing transactions, and all print r— and non -print media such as films, records and art prints. A child is defined as persons age 14 or younger.) 7049117 30. TOTAL loans (sum of lines 28 and 29) ............ 30 31. Reciprocal borrowing ................. ........... 75,591 _31 (Number of materials lent directly to card holders from other libraries during the fiscal year.) Interlibrary Loans 32,. Number of interlibrary loans provided to other libraries during the fiscal year ....... 29,061 32 33. Number of interlibrary loans received from other libraries during the fiscal year 29335 33 Reference Questions 34. Number of reference (as opposed to directional) questions by phone or in person. Answer line 33a if you have data for the year; if not, use lines 33b and c. 190 X529 *Tncludes BBS a. For the year: asked by adults,129 jQ21,'*; asked by children 52 1508 ;total b. For any one week in October: asked by adultsQuestions, asked by children total, c. For any one week in April: asked by adults asked by children total 34 (A reference question is a question which requires the use of books, periodicals or other resources such as index tools, the library catalog, online data bases or people outside the library.) 3 93194 FINANCIAL INFORMATION (REPORT WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY. Report all funds received or spent, but do NOT include funds spent by others for the benefit of the library.) Library Receipts by Source (Do not include balance from previous year or income from tax anticipation warrants.) 35. Local government Include capital income from sale of bonds. Exclude income from tax antics ation warrants. a. Local Government (except capital income from sale of bonds) . �., . . . . . . . 2,2 41. 3 3 6, b. Capital income from sale of bonds. ............ ....... .• ....... 35b 36. State government Exclude federal funds distributed by the state a. Per capita grants ......................... ............ 6_3 270 36a b. Equalization aid ..................... - 36b C.Corporate replacement tax ............. 26,692 36c d. Other (SPECIFY) 36d 37, Federal government Include federal money received through the state, e.g., LSCA grants, paid directly, to your library.. a. LSCA funds received ...................... ............ b. Other federal funds received ..................... ...... - - ---- ------ .... �37b 38. All other receipts ............ 1133,207 38 Report all monetary receipts not reported above, e.g., endowment income, gifts and donations, fines, payments for contract services, interest income, and receipts from a library system or from a loan or mortgage. 39. TOTAL receipts (sum of lines 35-38) ..M ............ .......... ... 294685505 39 Library Expenditures by Category (regardless of the source of funds) 40. Salaries and wages for all library staff INCLUDING building maintenance staff. 1X74,960 40 Include salaries and wages before deductions. Exclude fringe benefits for all library staff. 41. Fringe benefits paid by the library for all library staff INCLUDING building maintenance staff ....................... 30 683 41 ar Include fringe benefits paid by the library, such as insurance, IMRF, social security, etc. 42. Printed materials .......... ............ .......... 373 13,06 42 include expenditures for books, periodicals, microforms, pamphlets, government documents, etc. 43. Nonprint materials .......................................... 56t626 43 include expenditures for all materials used by visual project and/or sound reproduction (e.g., films, phonorecords, tape cassettes, filmstrips, slides, etc.), and for framed pictures, sculpture, etc. 287s940 44. All other operating expenditures not entered above ...... 44 Include expenditures for library and general office supplies, processing costs, commercial binding and rebinding, equipment, rent, utilities, repairs, etc. Report purchase of fixed assets on line 45. 45. Capital outlay for building construction 45 Show here the amount spent this year on construction of a new building or of an addition to or remodeling of an existing building, which cost at least $ 1, 000. 46. Capital outlay for all other fixed assets ........................... 1439619 46 Report all expenditures for land and, improvements to land, for the purchase of existing building, for long-term debt retirement (e.g., mortgage payments), for equipment costing over $ 1,000, etc. Fixed assets are those t I t least 1 000 things which are not consumed in use, can be expected to last a least five years, and cost a I as $ , - 47, TOTAL of all expenditures (sum of lines 40-46) ................. 295459134 47 Lines 39 and 4 7 need not agree. 4 93/94 PERSONNEL (Report status as of the last day of the fiscal year.) 48. Staff Data (Only for people paid by the library) Group A: Professional librarians, media and audiovisual specialists, etc. For each Group A employee, list his/her position title (given by your library) and enter a code for that person's level of education, sex, total number of hours worked per week, and up to three assignments that are most characteristic of this employee's duties with the number of hours spent working in each of those assignments in a typical week. For example, some _Qrout), A employees will have only 1 assignment and some will have 2 or 3 assignments. List each Group A employee on a separate line. The head librarian's information must be listed on the first line, as marked, and is considered to have only "n work area, head librarian. Do not include persons employed as short-term substitutes. Business manager or other person(s) not a librarian should be counted under Group 9 below. Attach additional pages, if necessary. 1. ' Position Title—The position title 'Created and assigned to this Group A employee by your library. 11. Educ.—Use the highest appropriate number from the following code to indicate the extent of formal education. 1 —Less than a bachelor's degree 2—Bachelor's degree 3—Master's degree from other than ALA accredited library school program 4—Master's degree from ALA accredited library school program Ill. Sex—Use M for male and F for female. IV. Total Hrs/Wk —Total number of hours worked per week. If exact number is not known, supply your best, estimate. V. Hourly Rate—if the hourly rate is unknown, -enter the annual salary. Work Area Codes—Use the following codes when completing columns VI, VII, and Vill. 1--Children's/Youth Services 6—Automation/Systems [Assistant Librprian refers to a 2—Cataloging 7—Assistant Library Director librarian who has a broad range of 3 — Reference 8 — Bookmobile assignments, due to the small staff 4—Collection Development 9—*Assistant Librarian size of the library. Usually found 5 ---Circulation 10 —Other Type of Librarian in smaller libraries.) VI. Assignment I —The assignment in which this Group A employee works the largest number of hours per week. Code—Use one of the Work Area Code numbers listed above. Hrs/Wk—The number of hours spent in a typical week performing work related to Assignment 1. VII. Assignment 2—If this person has more than one assignment, the work area in which this Group A employee works the second largest number of hours per week. Code—Use one of the Work Area Code numbers listed above. Hrs/Wk—The number of hours spent in a typical week performing work related to Assignment 2. Vill. Assignment 3—If this person has more than two assignments, the work area in which this Group A employee works the third largest number of hours per week. Code—Use one of the Work Area Code numbers listed above. Hrs/Wk—The number of hours spent in a typical week performing work related to Assignment 3. (1) (11) '1 (111) 1 (IV) I (V) Educ. Total Hourly Position Title I Code Sex Hrs/Wk Rate (VI) (VII) (VIII) Assignment 1 Assignment 2 Assignment 3 Code Hrs/Wk 1 Code Hrs/WkIl Code Hrs/Wk Head Librarian Group B: Full-time or part-time technical and clerical employees Total number of hours all Group B employees worked in a typical week ...... 1298. 7 Minimum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate) ...................... $ 6.70 Maximum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate) ....... 18 - Group C: Full-time or part-time pages or shelvers Total number of hours all Group C employees worked in a typical week ....................... 60.5 Minimum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate) $ 5.010 Maximum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate) ................... 5.15 Group D: Full-time or part-time building maintenance, security or plant operation employee Total number of hours all Group D employees worked in a typical week . 176.7 Minimum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate) . ........... '7.� 00 Maximum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate) ......... $ 24-61 49. How many hours per week is considered full-time equivalence in your library? 3 Z .49 0 Iq Cr 14 19 Q 93/94 50. Was your library involved in a referendum during the last fiscal year? ........... Yes No X 50 If No, go directly to question 52. If Yes, please attach COPY Of the ballot Or 8 ststOms"t Of the proposition as presented to the voters. If more than one referendum occurred, report each separately. 51. For each type of referendum presented to the voters, indicate the date of the vote, and whether it passed; f ailed. Effective 0 Date of Referendum Passed Failed Date Tax Increase Referendum Bond issue Referendum Establishment Referendum Annexation Referendum Conversion Referendum Other (Please Specify) 52. For district libraries only: If in the last year, or in the period before filing this report, you took action to convert to public library district status by approval of your corporate authority (under P.A. 86-346 and P.A. 86-713), led or annexed additional territory in an unincorporated area by backdoor referendum (under 75 Illinois Compi Statutes ULCS) 15/2-8), indicate the effective date of either action., 52 Effective Date Conversion Annexation 0. Name of library attorney John J. Zimerman 53 1190 S. EIM-0furst Road Address Mount Prospects IL 60056 Telephone: I 708_) 439-2500 $ 54 54. Amount of surety bond ................................ NOTE: 75 Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILLS) 5/4-9, requires that the bond be "not less than 50% of the total funds received Cr by the library in the last fiscal year" for municipalities of less than 50,000 population (Paragraph 4-9), and for public library a Q districts (75 Illinois: Compfled Statutes (ILLS) 15/4-10). 1 55., Person to contact (if necessary) concerning the information reported on this form 1� Marilyn G. Genther Telephone: 708 253-5675 55 Name: CERTIFICATION, 56. This annual report is filed by the undersigned public library pursuant to Illinois Comp, ed Statutes (ILCS) for the fiscal year commencing May I — 19 3 and ending Apri 1, 30 19 9 , (Report the beginning and ending dates (month, day, and year) of your most recently completed fiscal year.) 56 57 57. Signature of the librarian (The Board of directors herewithaq'pts th re, certifies its essential accuracy and transmits it to the Illinois 4bo State Library in accordance with ibe above 'seta "o. e. A 58 J n 1 fi.'l 199 58. Secretary (signatur Date signed by the secretary of the board. (Requires the signature of the secretary and president of the current library board.) June 16, 1994 -4Aj, 59 59. 'dent gnature) Date signed by the president of the board, L;1 - 1 - HOURS WORKED HOURLY ANNUAL POSITION EDUCATION SET PER WEEK RATE SALARY (A) PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIANS, MEDIA AND AUDIO VISUAL SPECIALISTS, ETC. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 4 F 37.5 $ 50,925 ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR 4 M 37.5 36,050 HEAD OF ADULT SERVICES 4 M 37.5 42,712 COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT & REFERENCE LIBRARIAN 4 F 37.5 37,878 REFERENCE LIBRARIAN & READERS ADVISOR SUPERVISOR 4 F 37.5 26,152 REFERENCE/DOCUMENTS LIBRARIAN 4 F 37.5 26,000 REFERENCE LIBRARIAN 4 M 37.5 26,000 REFERENCE LIBRARIAN 4 M 37.5 26,000 REFERENCE LIBRARIAN 4 M 37.5 26,000 REFERENCE LIBRARIAN & PATRON ASSISTANT SUPERVISOR 4 F 37.5 28,692 REFERENCE LIBRARIAN 4 F 24.0 $ 13.33 REFERENCE LIBRARIAN 4 F 28.0 16.34 HEAD OF TECHNICAL SERVICES 4 E 37.5 36,113 HEAD OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES/DEPUTY DIRECTOR 4 F 37.5 41,200 CHILDREN'S LIBRARIAN 4 F 37.5 28,438 CHILDREN'S LIBRARIAN 4 F 37.5 26,Ci00 SPECIAL SERVICES COORDINATOR 2 F 37.5 33,000 AUDIO-VISUAL TECHNICIAN/ GRAPHIC ARTIST 1 F 37.5 23,895 HOURLY ANNUAL RATE SALARY 24, 983 24,028 35,448 20,982 $ 10.34 21,000 22,355 11.03 10.77 10.83 11.46 11.36 11-36 6.70 7.47 22,355 22,810 11.10 23,633 2 HOURS WORKED POSITION EDUCATION SEX PER WEEK (B) TECHNICAL, CLERICAL AND OTHER STAFF ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1 F 37.5 BOOKKEEPER 1 F 37.5 DATA PROCESSING MANAGER 1 M 37.5 DATA PROCESSING TECHNICIAN 1 M 37.5 DATA PROCESSING TECHNICIAN 2 M 20.1 SPECIAL SERVICES ASSISTANT 2 F 37.5 PATRON ASSISTANT 1 F 37.5 PATRON ASSISTANT 1 F 23.8 PATRON ASSISTANT 2 F 15.5 PATRON ASSISTANT 2 M 14.6 PATRON ASSISTANT 2 F 26.4 READERS ADVISOR 2 F 18.0 READERS ADVISOR 2 F 19.8 DOCUMENTS CLERK 1 F 18.9 CLERK 2 F 26.1 CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT 2 F 37.5 (OUTREACH LIAISON - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL] CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT 2 F 37.5 [OUTREACH LIAISON - NURSERY SCHOOL AND PRESCHOOL] CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT 2 F 28.9 CHILDRENfS ASSISTANT 2 F 37.5 [NURSERY SCHOOL LIAISON AND DEPT. PROGRAMMING] HOURLY ANNUAL RATE SALARY 24, 983 24,028 35,448 20,982 $ 10.34 21,000 22,355 11.03 10.77 10.83 11.46 11.36 11-36 6.70 7.47 22,355 22,810 11.10 23,633 HOURLY ANNUAL RATE SALARY $ 22,355 7.25 33,271 18,245 15,977 14,412 13,065 13, 455 7.47 6.70 7.68 6.70 6.70 7.68 7.61 7.25 6.70 13,457 7.61 22,144 22,000 25,522 7.43 6.70 HOURS WORKED POSITION EDUCATION SEX PER WEEK (B) TECHNICAL, CLERICAL AND OTHER STAFF CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT 2 F 37.5 CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT 1 F 16.9 HEAD OF CIRCULATION 1 F 37.5 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 F 37.5 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 F 37.5 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 F 37.5 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 M 37.5 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 2 F 37.5 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT I m 5.0 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 F 17.6 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 F 19.0 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 M 15.4 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 M 20.0 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 F 16.7 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 2 F 20.3 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 F 31.3 CIRCULATION ASSISTANT 1 F 22.3 INFORMATION DESK ASST. 1 F 37.5 INFORMATION DESK ASST. 1 F 16.9 PROCESSING ASSISTANT 1 F 37.5 CATALOGING ASSISTANT 2 F 37.5 CATALOGING ASSISTANT 1 F 37.5 PROCESSING ASSISTANT 1 F 16.6 PROCESSING ASSISTANT 1 F 19.3 HOURLY ANNUAL RATE SALARY $ 22,355 7.25 33,271 18,245 15,977 14,412 13,065 13, 455 7.47 6.70 7.68 6.70 6.70 7.68 7.61 7.25 6.70 13,457 7.61 22,144 22,000 25,522 7.43 6.70 HOURS WORKED HOURLY ANNUAL POSITION EDUCATION SEX PER WEER RATE SALARY (B) TECHNICAL, CLERICAL , AND OTHER STAFF PROCESSING ASSISTANT 1 F 10.3 $ 11.06 PROCESSING ASSISTANT 1 F 19.1 7.61 ACQUISITIONS CLERK 2 F 37.5 $ 22,355 PROCESSING ASSISTANT 1 F 14.9 10.82 PROCESSING ASSISTANT 1 F 17.5 6.70 (C) PART-RIME HOURLY PAID PAGES OR SHELVERS SHELVER 1 F 8.6 5.15 SHELVER 1 M 15.6 5.00 SHELVER 1 F 24.7 5.15 SHELVER 1 F 6.1 5.00 SHELVER 1 F 5.5 5.00 (D) BLDG. MAINTENANCE, SECURITY OR PLANT OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR 1 M 37.5 $ 47,988 CUSTODIAN 1 M 37.5 21,314 MAINTENANCE 1 M 37.5 24,885 CUSTODIAN 1 M 17.8 7.46 CUSTODIAN 1 M 16.7 7.00 CUSTODIAN 1 M 14.9 7.84 CUSTODIAN 2 M 14.8 7.68 63. Secretary (a) Laura L. Luteri (b), 93/94 CURRENT LIBRARY BOARD AND OFFICIALS (d)302 S. I -Oka Mount Prospect, NOTE: This information is used for directory purposes and for meeting the annual legal reporting requirements of library districts. REPORT THE MOST RECENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE. 60. President ('al Jacqueline C. Hi saber (b) 708-577-6354 (c) 5/99 60 Name (Area Code) Telephone Mo. & Yr. When Grouwinkel (b) Present Term Ends (d) 211 West Coventry Place, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Mount Prospect, Complete Home Address 60056 61. Vice -President (a) Jewell A. Kern (b)_ 2,QB,- 2,55 _8255 (c) 5/95 61 (d), 1206 W. Lincoln Mount Prospect, IL 60056 1402 Greenwood Drive 62. Treasurer (a) 'Charles Bennett (b) 708-392-5744 (c) 5/99 62 (d),403 N. Pine Mount Prospect, IL 60056 63. Secretary (a) Laura L. Luteri (b), '708-3,92-5227 (c) 5/99 63 (d)302 S. I -Oka Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Ass't. Treasurer 64. Other Members (a) Kevin E. Grouwinkel (b) 708-818-950 {c)_5195 64 (d) 202 N. Owen Mount Prospect, IL 60056 65. ta) Cheryl A. Quinn N 708-259-8807 (c) 5/95 5 1402 Greenwood Drive Mount Prospect, IL 60056 6 6. (a), Sandra A. Truesdale (b) 708-635-9625 (c) 5/97 66 (d) 1633 Oneida Mount Prospect, IL 60056 67. (a), (b) (c) 67 (d) 1b), (c) 68 EE 69. tal b), (c), 69 (d) 70. (al, (d) (b) (c) 70 Thank you for completing this report. Please send one copy to your local government and send one original signed copy to your library system headquarters. The system headquarters will return a photocopy to you, make another for itself, a third for the University of Illinois Library Research Center, and send the original to the State Library. You are invited to attach to this report comments or suggestions as to how we can improve this form, what questions were difficult for you to answer, on what other topics you would like to see information gathered and made available, etc. (For System Use Only) Full name of system staff member who reviewed this form: > > CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE < < 7 m MIS 3SH3A3U NO 03nNIIN03 000601C ZsawnlOA 000" 06E ........... -jesn 3jlqndjoj alqel!eAV Zlewjoj OUVVq ui sallp jo jaqwnu PG1eUJ!IS3 -L x 11401:1-00 x Bull U0 z Z ........ iwalsAs asno4ui sauole pueas e -c) VYOH-00 gull U0 Z (D ........ 1welsAs paimp ja4joue jo tied -q x VY08-03 gull U0 z 9x i6ojejecl walsAs Ajejq!l leuoi6ai e jo jjed -e 'S3A (-Aldde 1e41 lie 13a'40) 1 1! Sl UP Z noA aie :31 ON 7— Sa), j6oleje3 opoil3ale ue jo tied spio3ai Boleje3 jnaA 9jV •q <V gSaARH --T— wapotN joindwo:) -0 ........... -jesn 3jlqndjoj alqel!eAV Z Z L * *1 # *1 # # # 0 * . . jaujalul -1 Z ..... siaindwo3 iuiV4 *q (0Sl0NOSIlM:aldUJex3) seseqeze(3 lei3jewuuo:) -a Z (D .............. .................. (aulluo slo'll1 1) Ol *P .. z0 jaqwnN ,O *to 0 # # h 0 * 0 . �p .1 .1 # .. 11 41 4 #,@, t 0 * I oils *3 Z I0Ae4 Ajejq!l anoA scop Buimollol a4l jo Auew mOH •C .01.44* 44. * 4 1.M . 4 6 0-0 4 ..... 6 3j:)O *q Z 901VIG *e UNR 16uI.m011OI 041 to Aue oz sq!jDsqns Ajejq!l inoA sao(] Z (EIVY WO AASUSP 461.4 'BAIJPASI.P Z/ l-£ *P Z ()I OZL.) A41.suep alqnop *OAIJP )ISIP Z/ L -C -0 Z ...... ........ (811Y Z" L) AASUSP 4614 'SAIJP )IS!P V/ L -9 q Z to* Ott ....... ()I 09C1 A4!suep alclnop 'SAPP )ISIP V/ l-9 le ON A JSOAIJP )ISIP BUIMOIJOI 941 to DUO GAe4 sisindwoo OSSI-li Aue op IS3A :11 ON x saA ijaindwoo oniyy apledwoo yyE]l Duo iseal le aAeI4 Ajejq!l inoA sao(] *tp SWUPUBO lse0H ---T— 'T439a' '15LUd gSaARH --T— wapotN joindwo:) -0 --iff, V.950,11 M w SJOlu'.Jd -P Z L joindwo:) aweji uielN 3 Z 1, ..... siaindwo3 iuiV4 *q Z C L) (s3ew C) SOU00 .... siaindwo:) Oj3iVj #e i asnalqncl i AjAil jalqqedIwo:) Vqjl jol i)lqel!eAV 10POWOUJON ui jaqwnN jaqwnN (,Ajessa3au p '948altis leuOIMPPe 43e;. V) I0Ae4 Ajejq!l anoA scop Buimollol a4l jo Auew mOH •C a-5--fWmas p3mg app["Illu --LI =1 (Aj!38dS SseOld) &SIG 6UI419WOS T– 130jele:) gulluo •t4 x Bougialau -P x soiticlejE) •1 -7— soilsileIS Ajejq!-j -6x suoillsinboV -3 6uISSG3OJd PJOA& isn uolun sielies x Ouiftleie:) -q • x Sueo-1 Ajejq!ljalul x loiluoz) Slelias -0 x YYOU-G:) *e (,Aldde le4l lie 13840) •sisindwoco sweiluiew/onitu asn noA 1431.4m JOI 6u.Im011OI 04110 SGII!A113e lie 13940 -Z ON SaA ZjeaA e ul.41!m walsAs e 4:)ns 01 431!ms of Buiuueld noA aje 'ON 11 ON x SaA 1welsAs uoijelmip pezijoindwoo e asn Alluenna Ajejqjj jnoA saoa • L juawaiddnS V661-C66L UVIdl V6/C6 91/94 IPLAR 1993-1994 Supplement LIBRARIAN POSITION VACANCIES AND ELIMINATIONS (Report Status as of the last day of the fiscal year.) List vacant or eliminated librarian positions in the appropriate spaces below (questions 8 and 9). Do not include librarians employed as short-term substitutes. Attach additional pages, if necessary. 1. Work Area Code—Please enter one code number for each vacancy using the Work Area Codes ligted below. 1— Children's/Youth Services 6—Automation/Systems (Assistant Librarign refers to a 2—Catalog 7— Assistant Library Director librarian who has a broad range of 3 — Reference 8 — Bookmobile assignments, due to the small staff 4—Collection Development 9 --'`Assistant Librarian size of the library. Usually found 5—Circulation 10—Other Type of Librarian in smaller libraries.] Il. Number of Weeks Vacant—indicate the number of weeks this position has been vacant. Ill. Hours per Week—indicate the number of hours required per week. IV. Education Required—Use the highest appropriate number in the following code to indicate the extent of formal education required. 1 —Less than a bachelor's degree 2—Bachelor's degree 3—Master's degree from other than ALA accredited library school program 4—Master's degree from ALA accredited library school program V. Salary Offer Range—indicate the lowest and highest annual salary that your library is willing to offer. 8. Librarian Position Vacancies at Fiscal Year End (Include only those budgeted ribrarian positions vacant the last day of the 1993/94 fiscal year that remained vacant for longer than six months and for which there was an active search during this time.) (1) (11) (111) (IV) (V) Work Area Number of Hours per Education Salary Offer Range Code Weeks Vacant Week Required Lowest Highest 9. Eliminated Librarian Positions within the Fiscal Year 1993/94 (An Eliminated Librarian Position refers to those positions which were budgeted for in the 1993/94 fiscal year but are not in the library's 1994/95 budget.) (1) (11) (111) (IV) Work Area Number of Hours per Education Code I Weeks Vacant Week I Required [E (V) Salary Offer Range Lowest Highest 0 41 Cr VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Ij ILLINOIS fj X, INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS �� 5 �4 W FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO DATE: DECEMBER 1., 1993 SUBJECT: SURPLUS FIRE APPARATUS I attended the Illinois Fire Chief Symposium recently held in Bloomington, Illinois. Highlights of the symposium included presentations by Chief Jim Doelman of the Quincy Fire Department and Chief Floyd Floarke from Valmeyer, Illinois. They spoke of the devastation caused by the Mississippi River floods of 1993. Many rural and city fire departments suffered heavy losses of equipment and much worse, their tax base in many cases floated away when the levees broke. Some fire protection districts will not receive taxes to operate their departments for two years. The Illinois Fire Chiefs Association is sponsoring a program to help these stricken departments by collecting surplus equipment and coordinating weekend work groups to help with the clean-up phase. Communities affected by the flood will not recover for some time and that is barring heavy spring rains that could cause more flooding. I would like to see the Village of Mount Prospect join this ' recovery effort. Sometime this budget year, we are planning to sell a 1966 Chevrolet Pumper. The vehicle is operable to minimum standards. However, this vehicle does not have the required enclosed cab that provides a measure of safety for responding personnel. The approximate value of this vehicle is between one and three thousand dollars. Fire Department maintenance personnel do not believe the high-end amount is realistically achievable. I have been in contact with a Dr. Charles Neal, who works with a fire district in Southern Illinois. He has indicated a keen willingness to accept this vehicle if the Village is willing to make the donation. What appeals to them is that this engine has a 750 gallon water tank which makes it very useful in rural areas without water main and hydrant systems. Their Fire District operates on an annual budget of $14,000.00. Their needs are staggering. I see this as an opportunity for the Village of Mount Prospect to render assistance to communities in their time of great need. ziws CAF/ 6/27/94 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MQUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, it has been determined that it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain ownership of a 1966 Fire Department Pumper, identified as follows: One 1966 Chevrolet Darley Pumper, 750 gallons per minute Pumper 750 gallon booster capacity, VIN HL 6536 F 142208 WHEREAS, natural disasters have left many communities and fire districts in need of the equipment necessary to protect lives, fight fires and offer the basic services that are taken for granted by many more fortunate communities and/or districts; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that the best interests of the Village would be served by disposing of the fire pumper being the subject of this Ordinance and donating said pumper to another governmental entity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ON E: The corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the 1966 Chevrolet fire pumper being the subject of this Ordinance which is owned by the Village of Mount Prospect is no longer useful or necessary to the Village and the best interests of the Village will be served by its disposal. Further, the value to the Village of the release set forth in SECTION TWO hereinbelow is greater than any potential monetary value of this equipment. SECTION TWO: That the Village Manager of the Village of Mount Prospect be and is hereby authorized to transfer the title of the 1966 Chevrolet fire pumper being the subject of this Ordinance to the Ewing Northern Fire Protection District, located in southern Illinois. The Village of Mount Prospect offers no warranty, express or implied, on the condition or serviceability of this equipment and a statement expressing this understanding shall be signed by representatives of the Ewing Northern Fire Protection District, releasing the Village of Mount Prospect of any liability and assuming full responsibility for the equipment upon taking possession. SECT10N THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994. Gerald L. Farley, Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk CAF/ 6/27/94 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF CERTAIN PERSONAL PROPER DC QWNED BY THg VILLAGE OF MOQ!2! E!,R.PQT WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, it has been determined that it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain ownership of three (3) television cameras along with control units used by the Cable Television Division, identified as follows: Three (3) JVC BY -110, 3 Color Tube Cameras with Control Units WHEREAS, in the spirit of cooperation between governmental entities, the corporate authorities have determined that the residents of the Village and School District 57 would be served by donating said cameras for use by School District 57. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: �EQTIQN ONE: The corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the 3 television cameras being the subject of this Ordinance which are owned by the Village of Mount Prospect are no longer useful or necessary to the Village and the best interests of the Village will be served by disposing of said property in the manner specified. The Village Board has determined that the community will continue receiving value because of this donation which value exceeds the potential monetary value of this equipment. SECTION That the Village Manager of the Village of Mount Prospect be and is hereby authorized to transfer the title of three (3) JVC BY -110, 3 color tube cameras along with control units to Mount Prospect School District 57. The Village of Mount Prospect offers no warranty, express or implied, on the condition or serviceability of this equipment. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk . . . . ........... Gerald L. Farley, Village President EDWARD M. CAVELLO SMOKE DETECTORS FIRE CHIEF SAVE LIVES - WILL YOUR DETECTOR LONNIE H. JACKSON WORK WHEN YOU DEPUTY CHIEF NEED IT? DIRECTOR CHECK IT WEEKLY TO: Village Manager Mike Janonis FROM: DJC Lonnie H. Jackson DATE: June 23, 1994 SUBJECT: EXPLANATION OF CHANGE TO THE FIRE PREVENTION CODE In discussions with Inspection Services Director, Chuck Bencic, it was decided that he would adopt the B.O.C.A. Property Maintenance Code with the exception of the Chapter 7, which was the fire prevention chapter of this standard code. If Fire Prevention wanted to utilize this particular section of the Property Management Code, then the Fire Prevention Bureau would have to move Chapter 7 under the adoption clause of the Fire Prevention Code. This particular chapter is not any additional code requirements than what we have at this time, but the code is better described as to what property standards must be and how they are to be maintained, especially in the area of multi -family buildings. This should make the enforcement in the multi -family buildings (apartments and condominiums) easier to understand by the tenants and owners. CAF/ 6/14/94 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 ENTITLED "FIRE PREVENTION CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: �SECTION ONE: That Section 24.102 entitled "Adoption of Fire Prevention Code" be 116= amended to adopt the 1991 edition of the National Fire Prevention Code and to adopt Article VII of The BOCA National Property Maintenance Code of 1990; so that hereinafter the first paragraph of Section 24.102 shall be and read as follows: Sec. 24.102. Adoption of Fire Prevention Codes. The 1991 National Fire Prevention Code, the BOCA National Fire Prevention Code, Eighth Edition, 1990, and Article VII of the BOCA National Property Maintenance Code, 1990 entitled "Article 7: Fire Safety Requirements" as published by the Building Officials and Code Administrators International, Inc., is hereby adopted as the Fire Prevention Code of the Village of Mount Prospect, in the State of Illinois; for the control of buildings and structures as herein provided; and each and all of the regulations, provisions, penalties, conditions and terms of said BOCA National Fire Prevention Code. " SECTION O: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after is passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,7�,,,�,,,,--' M4GNEEUNG DEPARlWfDa MOUNT PROSPECT, UIJNOLS 60056 INTEROFFICE 'MEMORANDUM' TO: Michael J=66 Village ger Carol Fields, V&p Clerk FROM: Jeff Wulbecker, Engineering CoordinatorJ DATE: June 20, 1994 SUBJECT: Dempster Development Center Mount Prospect Park District Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval and acceptance of this project Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting. JW/M l�� LIP Mll� I - z w ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: ............... ENGINEER PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: CLERK, PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERX AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ENGINEER ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING APPROVAL: PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PUB.WKS.DIR. INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL INSP-SERV.DIR. FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FIRE PREVENTION EMIC 1202RQV�221=� I= ACCERTA= BX MIL WATER MAIN N/A SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER ROADWAYS SIDEWALKS .. ........ ..... &&- STREET REGULATORY SIGNS, NZA STREET LIGHTS # N/A PARKWAY T ES # PARKWAY LANDSCAPING QQMF.L9TS RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS- N/A WATER MAIN -�JQ761 SANITARY SEWER 412 1 0 040 STORM SEWER 7 ROADWAY I'll, .............. I PARKING LOTS LANDSCAPING MHELETE2. RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS O&BUTE, APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTIEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF 1994. VillageClerk t0o - aiq:SMK 'JOAMAi si .qljo linsai vSV aA10301 IPA&mdsoid junoWjo ORMA OT pus f4OPOS tunosnWM!JOjSaj Olp SSU!AlRSjupwmU olqmp!suoo oqljo uon O000i ua poAoiddu oq nA!vA& st qj lvqi puu'.poA!rm oq poilS oldvW qinoS 101 w xauuV wnasnIN popolsUl podsoq junon posodoid oqljoj waisAs uoissaiddns ojU vjoj jumaiinbai Buq)p!q aqj jvqj puauru-ioc)ai pinoAijpls o&IPA Put APPOS wnasnW M!jolsU4 mdsoicl junoW oql -ttl `o 1$ it, tualsKs si .qj loj alonb s,,Kuiadujoo oqj Aq pauuijuoo uooq svq dumus si U • xauuV aqj joj walsAs aqj Su!doloAap ui Su'PUnq tun0snW IDOPOls!H urexu oql wojj SupoomS joqno ji;aql osn ol f4!j!qia.�aqj ol onp si sguars s. uoissoidd 0 w ua qL •uja:pA a ns oxg aipjoj paAoiddu sl lomoo anjji sisoo Supaguiguo ut 0004ol$ of 000"Ss OAM Ima 08'elpA aqj saAaqoq "jumWedo(I aj!g toolorr amuol -puguoo uoijullulaq oqj pop mmv sI 1t ji ogmqc) jo aoig walsAs oqlioj suoilroUtoods SupooUISUO TTnj andaid ol Sui Iuft si pim xouuV wnasnW popoisgl aqj u! umisAsmpw!s v Suq u! polsonju! si Auvdwoo sT -oul cloiluoz) O.H4 Aa umisAs uomaiddns juvw qL ., & arig v jo uo4uUvlsuq puv Supaouiguo aqj papnjoin not jvj!jiqvqai jvqj jo .red "pam. q a Butoq qT Rq .1 0 sum wjjS aldrpq qjnoS 101 Iv wnasnW leopois!H loodsoicl junoW oqljo Suipq u!uw aqj uaqM P x3Nxv masfm rivamoiLsm imasoua Lmaow ao wzLsxs Noissauaaas axu uoa ao uamvm :jjaraas V661 191 amm :ajLva WOT uawivria,smas -a riavmnv :iNom uaf)vmvw aDvqmA,,sixoxvf "a riaviEiaiw :OJL siouilil I-padswa )unolq lm2miuvaa(l f)NINKvqa 133clSOUcl INMON AO HDVrlrllA Yillm FIRE CONTROL, INC. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 255 ALDERMAN AVENUE WHEELING, IL 60090 708-4594570 FAX: 708459-0849 L PROPOSAL May 12, 1994 Applied Design - 200 E. Evergreen Mt. Prospect, IL. RE: Mt. Prospect Historical Society Att: Fred Thulin Gentlemen; At your -request we are pleased to quote herewith our price of Ten Thousand One Hundred Forty-four ($10,144.00) Dollars to furnish and install the following sprinkler equipment for the above job. Our price includes the following items: 1. (Shop drawings which will be submitted to the Mt. Prospect Fire Department for approval before work is started. 2. Fabrication of materials in our shop and delivery to job site on our truck. 3. Install system on job including: a. Connection to existing Dry sprinkler system in the Museum and extending it. to the new Handicapped Facilities Bldg. b. Overhead dry pipe sprinkler system designed in accordance with NFPA standard #13 to provide protection -as follows: 1. Recessed Sprinklers in the heated basement from piping run in the joist channels. 2. Concealed Dry Pendent sprinklers on the first floor from piping run in the attic space. 3. Upright sprinklers on exposed piping in the attic. 4. Upright sprinklers on exposed piping in the existing Carriage House. 5, Wax coated Upright sprinklers on exposed piping in the passageway between the buildings. c. Low point drains as required. d. U.L. listed control valve on sprinkler main coming into building with tamper switch. e. Underground fire line from main building to the new building. Others are to supply the trench. SEE BACK FOR GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FIRE CONTROL, IN Our price does not include the following: 1. overtime (work outside of regular working hours) 2. Painting (except factory priming of equipment) 3. Fees for permits and plan review. 4. Trench for installation of Fire Line from main building. 5. Electric wiring of tamper switches and furnishing and installing of any other alarm equipment such as bells and control panels. This is our understanding of the Plans 1 Through 7 dated 11/15/90 If you have any questions please contact the writer* If this proposal meets with your approval, please sign the acceptance statement below and return to our office. We have enclosed a duplicate copy for your files. Yours very truly FIRE CONTROL, INC. Lyon Fax (708) 459-0849 The foregoing proposal is hereby accepted this day of 19 firm name Signature and title mtprhist/tl lip Ift VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ILLINOIS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Sims, Planner FROM: Lonnie Jackson, Deputy Fire Chief DATE.- June 2, 1994 SUBJECT: Historical Society Annex Building The annex building proposal submitted by the officers of the Historical Society did not include the sprinkler fire ;protection and was thus rejected by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The 1917 house which was converted into a museum has afixed fire protections (sem tinstalled throughout which was designed and installed by Fire Control, Inc. of Whe heyhave calculated the system for water flow and installed the dry sprinkler system as, designed. The proposal to add theannex fixed fire protection off of the existing system in the house is an econoapcal proposal asiteliminates the reed for pipe valves, another double detector check valve, separate monitor system, extension of the 4w ter main, and sprinkler valves. It is my opinion that other costs would also be eliminated, such as re-engineering the existing system (hydraulic calculation), etc., because Fire Control, Inc. has their information on file and has access to the information. Much cost can be saved by using the present system and treating the annex as a branch of the existing system, instead of duplicating the reserve system in the annex, and by using the designing engineer who installed the original system, to add protection to the annex. Respectfully Submitted, 04Lonnie �., Jackson Deputy Fire Chief W"Jo, of I F�'111 'IN 2 1994 goo, VILLAGE OFMOUNT PROSPECT FINANCE DEPARTMENT W90:19 U044:2UMIUVIS)z TO: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director DATE: July 1, 1994 SUBJECT: Final Amendment to the 1993/94 Budget The Village of Mount Prospect has adopted, a provision of Illinois Statutes which provides for an annual budget as the authorization to expend monies in lieu of an annual appropriation ordinance. One of the major differences between the "Budget Law" and the "Appropriation Law" is that the Budget Ordinance must be adopted prior to the start of the fiscal year, whereas the Appropriation Ordinance can be adopted up to 90 days after the start of the fiscal year. There are numerous advantages to the Budget Law, but it does require estimates to be made sooner than under the Appropriation Law. As a result, amendments to the budget are more likely under the Budget Law than under the Appropriation Law. An amendment was prepared for changes to the 1993/94 budget that were anticipated when the 1994/95 budget was put together. These changes reflected our best estimates as of the middle of January 1994. Since that time there have been changes to those estimates in three funds that require a final amendment to the 1993/94 budget. The changes are described below: 1. In the Downtown Redevelopment Construction Fund, the -purchase of the property at, 1 South Emerson was expected to take place after May 1, 1994 and was included in the 1994/95 Budget as an expected expenditure. Because we actually closed in April, we need to increase the 1993/94 Budget by $160,000. 2. In the Flood Control Construction Fund, more work was completed on the Prospect Manor - North Main Project and the Haden Heights Project than had been expected. The budget amendment adds $300,000 to the Haden Heights Project and $150,000 to the Prospect Manor - North Main Project. It should be mentioned that these budget changes do not increase contract amounts, but merely reflect the budget year when funds are expended. 3. Due to increasing interest rates earlier this year, bonds for the Street Improvement Construction Fund were sold earlier than had been anticipated. This resulted in certain costs in the 1993/94 fiscal year rather than in 1994/95. The amendment increases the budget in 1993/94 from $20,000 to $70,000. The above changes are the final changes that are needed for the 1993/94 Budget. M AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1993 TO APRIL 301, 1994 WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have passed and approved Ordinance No. 2342 which sets the finances of the Village under the "Budget Officer System," and WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid Ordinance and the Statutes of the State of Illinois an annual budget for the fiscal year commencing May 1, 1993 to April 30, 1994 was adopted through the passage of Ordinance No. 4538 approved by the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect on April 21, 1993 and as further amended by Ordinance No. 4625 adopted March 1, 1994; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have reviewed certain additions and changes to the aforesaid budget for fiscal 1993/94; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect believe the changes, as specified on the attached 1993/94 budget amendment page, to be in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect. NOW,, THEREFORE., BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,i•COUNTY) ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE; That the fiscal year 1993/94 budget for the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby amended, as detailed on 1993/94 Budget Amendment No. 2 attached hereto. SEGTN: That this Ordinance shall be in -full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this 5th day of July, 1994. ATTEST: Carol A. _ Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President VELLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1993/94 Budget Amendment No, 2 April 30 1994 Dowry vin Redev91.QLrfte_n1, -Q= 55-077-62-8033 Property Acquisition All Other D/T Redevelopment Amounts Amended D/T Redevelopment Const. Fund JEPa, Flo od—Cons=Rqhion—F Original Amended Budget Increase Budget Amol !!D _ re e AmQoL— $ $1601,000 $ '160000 *021,000, 350.00Q z $ 0113 $,1,60.-,M ULIM 81-077-66-8013 Haden Heights Const. $ 639v6,90 lik��',' $ 13001000, 50,490 $ 9390,690 -3jl&42 81-077-66-8017 P-M/N-M Const. IEPA Flood Const. Fund Changes $3,868,170, $ 450v000 $4,318, 170 All Other IEPA Flood Const. Fund B36 a & 7A.7M, Amended IEPA Flood Const. Fund $4,704,90 $ 450,2W $11"1 4-12W r e g t�', r= e, �n t—nd 82-077-71-6690 Street Improvements S 22 $ 51000 70.WQ Amended Street Improvement Const. Fund $ . ..... . 2012W $'',--50.Ml $ 70M VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCE DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael E. Jannis, Village Manager FROM*-, David C. Jepson, Finance Director DATE: March 21, 1994 SUBJECT: Impact of the New Solid Waste Contract on the 1994/95 Refuse Disposal Budget When the 1994/95 Refuse Disposal Budget was prepared, it was based upon the costs included in the current refuse contract for the first three months ay July), and the estimated costs in, a new contract for the balance of the year (August -April). In the new contract, we had assumed a modest, decrease in the pick-up charge for single-family units, an increase in multi -family costs, an increase in recycling costs, and an increase in the costs for brush andyard waste. Additionally, there was a sign1ificant increase for "tipping fees" because of the new SWANCC transfer station. In total, theproposed 1994/95 Refuse Disposal Budget of $2,952,195 was expected, to be $242,195 more than the 993/94 budget of $2,710,000, with $216,400 of the increase due to increased tipping fees. Bids for the new refuse contract were received on March 7, 1994, and the results are much better than had been anticipated. Based upon the recommended bid prices for the Modified Volume Based Collection Program, the 1994/95 proposed Refuse Disposal Budget of $2,952,195 can be reduced $455,000 to $2,497,195. The revised 1994/95 Budget of $2,497,195 is $455,000 less than had been previously anticipated and is actually $212,805, or 7.9%, less than the 1993/94 Refuse Disposal Budget. The attached schedule shows the 1994/95 Revised Budget Amounts compared to 1992/93 Actual, 1993/94 Estimated, and the 1994/95 Proposed Budget. The 1994/95 Revised Budget Amounts are made up of the amounts, for May -July at the current contract costs and the amounts for August -April at the new contract costs. The column at the far right side represents the difference between the 1994/95 Proposed Budget and the 1994/95 Revised Budget. The reduction in the 1994/95 budget is very dramatic; however, the reductions in the 1995/96 and 1996/97 budgets should be even more remarkable. This can be attributed to the fact that the 1994/95 budget amounts include only nine months at the new contract prices. We can estimate the charges associated with the new contract with a degree of accuracy, but the amount of future tipping fees remains a question. We will be able to refine these figures after we have more experience with the actual number of tons delivered to the SWANCC transfer station. Nevertheless, based upon current projections, the budget amounts for 1995/96 and 1996/97 should be about $700,000 per year lower than our previous projections. Michael E. Janonis Page 2 Impact of the New Solid Waste Contract on the 1994/95 Refuse Disposal Budget On the revenue side, we have evaluated the impact of the new contract on multi -family charges and on the fee for the yard waste/refuse stickers. Additionally, we have reevaluated the amount of property taxes that will be required to fund refuse disposal. A discussion of these revenues follows. Because the new contract fees for multi -family units are being decreased $79,500, it is expected that the Village charges to multi -family units will be reduced about $60,000, or approximately 9% lower than 1993/94 charges. A portion of the savings will be realized by the Village and the balance would be passed on to the multi -family residents. The change in the specific charges will vary depending upon the number and capacity of the refuse containers and the number of times the containers are picked up each week. These changes will be worked out on a complex by complex basis and will become effective August 1, 1994. In regard to the fee for the yard waste/refuse sticker, there is an increase in the unit cost for yard bag collection in the new contract and a decrease in the unit cost for refuse in excess of two containers. We discussed the possibility of two rate structures for refuse stickers, i.e. one price for a refuse sticker and a different price for a yard waste sticker. However, we believe it would be easier for the residents and easier for the Village to administer if one sticker could be used for both purposes. As a result, the stickers would need to be the same price. Based upon estimated volumes for yard waste and the number of excess refuse containers, the savings from the excess refuse containers would offset the additional costs from yard waste for at least the first year of the new contract. Because of this, it would not be necessary to increase the sticker price for at least the first year and possibly the second year of the new contract. We will be able to further evaluate the trade-off after we have a more accurate count of the excess refuse containers and the actual number of tons of refuse delivered to the transfer station. There will also be a greatly reduced requirement for the amount of property taxes allocated for refuse disposal in 1994, 1995 and 1996. If other revenue sources in the Refuse Disposal Fund are maintained at expected levels (Multi -Family at $350,000 and Refuse Stickers at $248,500), the allocation of 1994 property taxes could be reduced about $350,000. The amount of the reductions for 1995 and 1996 are tentative at this time, but they should be in the range of $500,000 to $600,000. These potential reductions represent a major change in the amount of property taxes that will be allocated to fund refuse disposal. It should provide an opportunity to either reduce the amount of future property tax levies or reevaluate the revenue sources that are used to finance General Fund services. DCJ/sm Enc Personal Services Contractual Services: SIF Refuse Collection (1) M1F Refuse Collection (2) S1F Recycling M1F Recycling Tipping Fees - SWANCC Tipping Fees - Contractor (3) Yard Bag Collection All Other Total Commodities Total Refuse Disposal (1) Estimated Tipping Fees of $342,500 for 1992193, $359,625 for 1993194, and $94,200 for 1994195 (May - July) are included under Tipping Fees -Contractor, (2) Estimated Tipping Fees of $257,500 for 1992193, $270,375 for 1993194, and $70,800 for 1994195 (May - July) are included under Tipping Fees -Contractor. (3) Tipping Fees are estimated $25.00 per ton for 24,000 tons in 1992193, $26.25 per ton for 24,000 tons in 1993194, and $27.50 per ton for 6,000 tons in 1994195. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1994195 Refuse Disposal Budget 1994195 Proposed Budget Amounts Revised For New Contract March 21, 1994 1992193 1993194 1994195 ------ 1994195 Revised Budget Amounts -----i 1994/95 Actual Estimated Proposed Period of Period of Total Increase or -- Costs Costs Budget 5/94-7/94 8194-4195 1994/95, i sm $ 54,214 $ 60,835 $ 63,095 $ 15,775 $ 47,320 $ 631,095 $ $1,007,340 $19120,875 $1,030,600 $289,600 $ 3869500 $ 6769100 (354,500) 3009678 2141225 2651,400 557900 130,000 185,900 (791,500) 296,234 3281,675 387,800 84,000 2411700 3253,700 (62, 100) 259739 281,525 329900 79900 23,000 30,900 (21.000) - 6811,400 - 7283,000 728,000 46,600 600,000 6303,000 1651,000 165,000 - 16550000 - 2259763 268,900 296,100 157,300 135,300 2921,600 (33,500) 110297 13,M 14 _J3,725 11,175 14 $274677071 $2,605,000 $298742100 $7631,425 $1,6559675 $2,419,100 $(455,000) 13,,197 132 15,000 3.75 11.25 - 1 S2,53444 4 7 2. 2, M -L782M $1,171412:114 7 1 45 (1) Estimated Tipping Fees of $342,500 for 1992193, $359,625 for 1993194, and $94,200 for 1994195 (May - July) are included under Tipping Fees -Contractor, (2) Estimated Tipping Fees of $257,500 for 1992193, $270,375 for 1993194, and $70,800 for 1994195 (May - July) are included under Tipping Fees -Contractor. (3) Tipping Fees are estimated $25.00 per ton for 24,000 tons in 1992193, $26.25 per ton for 24,000 tons in 1993194, and $27.50 per ton for 6,000 tons in 1994195. TAI Mount �Prospect Public 'Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM I= CM USA TO: VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: SOLID WASTE COORDINATOR DATE: MARCH 18, 1994 RE- SOLID WASTE BID RECOMMENDATIONS On March 7 bids for the Village's residential solid waste contract were opened and tabulated. A full analysis of the bid results were given to -the Solid Waste Commission on Monday, March 14 for their independent review'or to the March 17 Commission pn Meeting. (Copies of the bid tabulations and analysis are attached for distribution to the Mayor and Village Board.) As a result of the Commission's review and discussion of the solid waste bid the following recommendations were formulated by the Commission members at the March 17 meeting. In addition to their written recommendations Chairman Westlake is prepared to present the recommendations to the Mayor and Board of Trustees on Tuesday,, March 29. At that time Chairman Westlake and Village staff will also be prepared to respond to any questions. MOUNT PROSPECT SOLID WASTE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE CONTRACT (Commissioners Bill Donovan,, Elizabeth Herbert,, Holly Johnson, George Luten", Rod Mobus,, Harold Rentschler, Ken Westlake and Mary Winkler were in attendance and voted on each recommendation. Commissioner Dick Bachhuber was not present for the discussion or voting.) le Residential Solid Waste Hauler - ARC Disposal Company The Commission unanimously recommended ARC Disposal Company as the solid waste hauler to be awarded the contract. The Commission's recommendation was based on the factors listed below: Low bidder (by a significant margin) Past performance o Residential Solid Waste Program -.Modified Volume Based Service (two (2) - 32 gallon contamiers/bulk item., 3 clean-up weeks and recycling - services provided through property tax. The Commission recommended by a vote of 7 to I to continue with the Village's current modified volume based collection program. (lbe one (1) descending vote was in support of a one (1) container modified program; there was no support for either an unlimited service system or a pure user fee system.) The Commission's recommendation, was based on the factors listed below: Cost benefit to the community Less costly than unlimited collection program Incentive to recycle will reduce volume of waste being landfilled-, less tipping fees Maxinuizig use of recycling program which is paid through property taxes Community Awareness/Education Residents have adapted to current program and are aware of the need to reduce waste Citizen Input Feedback "from residents supporting current system; solid waste services paid through taxes. (Resident comments received in response to Trustee Wilks request for input.) 0 Optional Recyclables - The bid specifications defined a nucleus of items that were to be collected. In addition, bidders were asked to indicate the cost and availability of optional items to be collected. Based on the factors listed below the Commission unanimously recommended the following optional items be added to the nucleus of recyclables for both s M^gle and multifamily recycling programs. Plastics (#3, 5, 6 &7) No additional cost Will reduce the volume of residential waste Scrap Metal - parameters to be determined by Village No additional cost Will reduce the volume of residential waste Although car batteries were also identified as an optional item that could be added at no 1. 1 additional cost'.. the Commission unanimously voted not to include car batteries due to the potential safety hazards of curbside collection and residents do have alternative disposal methods that are environmentally safe and available at no cost, via retailers. 0 Reusable Household Goods - The Comrrussion had no recommendation at this time. Discussion focused on the availability of services to dispose of reusable household goods already in existence. Brush Collection Option - The bid specifications 'included an option that would pay for the collection of brush bundles througli a flat per unit/per month fee billed on a twelve month basis. This option was "included primarily to determine if the current per unit fee system was the most cost-effective. The Commission members unanimously reconimended, that the current per bundle fee system be maintained based on the factors listed below: Cost Benefit Based on the estimated brush bundles collected by the hauler it remains less costly to pay a per bundle rate than a flat fee per unit/per month. Ile Cornrm'ssion would like to thank the Board for the opportunity to review the bid results and provide input into the bid award process. The Commission strongly supports the Village's solid waste management plan and feels the residents of this community are to be commended for their efforts in waste reduction and resource recovery. Village of Mount Prospect Year I Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 7th bid opening and current solid waste services billing Art Sexton Lak9aw Waste Mfg Northshore Groot Browning-Feffis sposar Disposal Waste Systems Northwest " Waste Control Recydingleste Industries Current Basic Service aid gte-_-FarnfflyDefuse - Annual fee for 13,425 $ 528,408.00 $ 581,571.00 $ 633,123.00 $ 950,490.00 $ 916,659.00 $ 1,440,234.00 $ 1,387,071.00 $ 1,512,729.00 curbside refuse collectionitransportation service per residential unit - SWANCC waste - no tipping fee included (once a week service) - No container limit afteqFamil �ecrc[in - Annual fee for 13,425 322,200.00 462,357.00 473,634.00 402,750.00 652,455.00 389,862.00 600,903.00 33 ! 3,477.00 once a week basic service; includes 50/50 split of recycling revenue. Recycling includes the following materials: aluminum food & beverage containers; tinlbi-metallsleel cans including aerosol cans; clear and colored glass bottles1containers; all HDPE & PETE plastic containers; corrugated cardboard; telephone books.- mixed paper, magazines, chipboard, milk cartons, drink boxes, formed aluminum food containers. Single Family Subtotal $ 850,608.00 $ 1, 043, 928.00 $ 1,106,757.00 $ 1, 353, 240.00 $ 1,569,114.00 $ 1, 830, 096.00 $ 1,987,974.00 $ 1, 846, 206.00 * muffiiff-amIfly defuse Collection - 7,892 172,950.72 519,249.48 475,599.48 396,531-00 466,853.64 567,651.84 467,532.12 507,438.24 Annual cost; SWANCC waste; no tipping fee included Witfamily e clfno - Annual Toter Fee; 4,265 22,575.36 39,199.92 108,858.84 73,800.00 6,978.00 69,513.72 113,256.00 22,513.02 includes 50/50 split of recycling revenues; same items as single-family Multifamily Repygl"'n, - Annual Curbside 335 8,040.00 11,537.40 11,818.80 10,050.00 16,281.00 9,728.40 14,994.60 8,296.56 Fee - including 50/50 split of recycling revenues; same items as single-family Multifamily Subtotal $ 203,566.08 $ 569,986.80 $ 596,277.12 $ 480,381.00 $ 490,112.64 $ 646,893.96 $ 595,782.72 $ 538,247.82 Basic Service Single/Multifamly Combined Total 21,317 $ 1*064,174.08 $ 1,613,914.80 $ 1,703,034-12 $ 1,833,621.00 $ 2*059,226.64 $ 2,476,989.96 $ 2,583,756.72 $ 2,384,453.82 Includes tipping fees - These figures reflect bids with no recycling revenue split; contractor keeps all revenues generated by recycling. VJL [SWBID94-XLS] 3/18/94 Long Form Page 1 VJL ISWBID94.XLS) 3/18/94 Long Form Page 2 Village of Mount Prospect Year I Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 71h bid opening and current solid waste services billing MisDOSat Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste MIg Groot Browning-Ferris Northshore Disposat Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control RecyclinyWaste Industries Current Modified Volume Based Service SIngIeI_Fa_miII _Refuse- Annual Eee, 13,425 797,445.00 1,014,930.00 1,013,319.00 1,288,800.00 1,478,898.00 1,507,896.00 2,074,968.00 N/A two 32 -gallon containers/bulk items, 3 cleanup weeks, recycling; SWANCC waste - no tipping fee included (once a week service) Modified Volume Based Unit Cost for N/A 0.55 0.90 1.25 1.00 1.75 1.38 1.58 N/A each container/bag/bundle or bulk item not covered by monthly fee. Unit cost is for collection, transportation, and disposal at SWANCC site; all SWANCC waste; no tipping fee included. (Estimated quantity: 64,600 units) Modified Volume Based Single/ Multifamily Combined Total 21,317 $ 1,001,0111.08 $ 1,584,916.80 $ 1,609,596.12 $ 1,769,181.00 $ 1,969,010.64 $ 2,154,789.96 $ 2,670,750.72 N/A % Discount allowed Village for payment 1% N/B N/B N/B N/13 N/B N/B 1% made by 20th day of following month. Yard Material Collection & Disposal Sjjigtq=Family - Curbside fee per bag/ 1.23 1.20 1.25 1.96 1.93 1.38 1.83 1.21 bundle/container; estimated quantities: Bags/Containers: 129,000 Bundles: 40,000 Bundled _brush .g�tin - Single-family 13,425 0.70 1.52 1.25 0.55 0.50 N/B 0.70 N/A monthly fee for unlimited curbside bundled brush collection - 12 month billing period. Bid no 50/50 split under modified volume based service VJL ISWBID94.XLS) 3/18/94 Long Form Page 2 Village of Mount Prospect Year 1 Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 7th bid opening and current solid waste services billing Arc Sexton Ladaw Waste Mlg Northshore Groot Browning-Ferris Disposal Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control RecydinglWaste Industries Current Service Options White Goods �fln - Cost per N/A item including collection/processing/ disposal - billed direct to user. Additional pec �- Amount to be �nale added to monthly unit/toter fee or if none indicate NIC (no charge). Plastics (#3, 5, 6, 7) Car Batteries Motor Oil Scrap Metal Reusable House GQo �d_ - Amount to be added to monthly single-family basic service or modified volume base fee or if none indicate NIC (no charge) SWANCC Tipping Fee; total single and multifamily (24,000 tons estimated @ 40.45 per ton) 15-00 20.00 25.00 � 30.00 25.00 30.00 20.00 N/A NIC NIC N/C N/A NIC N/A 0.25 N/A NIC NIA N/C - dropoff N/A NIC N/A N/C N/A N/A 1.00/gal N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.75 N/A NIC N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A NIC N/A NIC NIC 0.07 N/A N/A 0.11 970,800.00 970,800.00 970,800.00 970,800.00 970,800.00 970,800.00 970,800.00 N/A VJL 1SW81D94.XLSJ 3/18t94 Long Form Page 3 Village of Mount Prospect Year 2 Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 71h bid opening and current solid waste services billing Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste MIg Northshore Groot Browning-Ferris Disposal Disposal Waste Systems Northwest " Waste Control RecydinglWante Industries Basic Service abq1q:EAMJJy l of se - Annual fee for 13,425 $ 554,184.00 $ 628,290.00 $ 665,343.00 $ 979,488.00 $ 944,046.00 $ 1,498,230.00 $ 1,432,179.00 curbside refuse collection/transportation service per residential unit - SWANCC waste - no lipping fee included (once a week service) - No container limit Sino/e- Family 13,425 596,070.00 Amity Reg --cling - Annual fee for 338,310.00 499,410.00 492,966.00 415,638.00 671,787.00 405,97Z00 y — once a week basic service; includes 50/50 split of recycling revenue. Recycling includes the following materials: aluminum food & beverage containers; linlbi-metallsteel cans including aerosol cans; clear and colored glass bottles/containers, all HDPE & PETE plastic containers; corrugated cardboard, telephone books; mixed paper, magazines, chipboard, milk cartons, drink boxes, formed aluminum food containers. Single Family Subtotal $ 892f494.00 $ 1,127,700.00 $ 1,158,309.00 $ 1,395,126.00 $ t, 615, 833.00 $ 1, 904, 202.00 $ Z028,249.00 Ill udda—mit - 7,892 186,670.92 540,754.80 499,368.12 408,415.44 480,874.68 591,729.60 500,251.80 Annual cost; SWANCC waste; no tipping fee included Multifamily Recvc-l-tn-q - Annual Toter Fee-, 4,265 23,7,10.80 42,306.60 114,026.76 76,014.00 7,207.92 72,319.08 117,372.00 includes 50/50 split of recycling revenues; same items as single-family Multifamily Recycling - Annual Curbside 335 8,442.00 12,462.00 12,301.20 10,371.60 16,763.40 10,130.40 15,436.80 Fee - including 50/50 split of recycling revenues; same items as single-family Multifamily Subtotal $ 218,823.72 $ 595,523.40 $ 625,696.08 $ 494,801.04 $ 504,846.00 $ 674,179.08 $ 633,060.60 Basic Service Single/Multifamly Combined Total 21,317 $11,1111,3117.72 $1,723,223.40 $1,184,005.08 $1,889t927.04 $2,120.679.00 $2.15-78,381.08 $2,661,309.60 Includes tipping fees - These figures reflect bids with no recycling revenue split; contractor keeps all revenues generated by recycling. VJL ISWBIDNALSI 3/18/94 Long Form Page 4 VJL ISWBID94.XLS] 3/18/94 Long Form Page 5 Village of Mount Prospect Year 2 Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 7th bid opening and current solid waste services billing Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste M(g Northshore Groot Browning -Fear's Disposal OiWaf Waste Systems it* Northwest Waste Control ReqdOgNasie Industries Modified Volume Based Service din l - F �amjl �Rf �- A �nu I�F 13,425 847,386.00 1,095,480.00 1,064,871.00 1,327,464.00 1,524,006.00 1,569,114.00 2,139,408.00 two 32 -gallon containers/bulk items, 3 cleanup weeks, recycling; SWANCC waste - no tipping fee included (once a week service) Modified Volume Based Unit Cost for N/A 0.60 0.97 1.31 1.03 1.85 1.44 1.63 each container/bag/bundle or bulk item not covered by monthly fee. Unit cost is for collection, transportation, and disposal at SWANCC site; all SWANCC waste; no tipping fee included. (Estimated quantity: 64,600 units) Modified Volume Based Single/ Multifamily Combined Total 21,317 $1,066,209-72 $1,691,003.40 $1p690,567.08 $1,822,265.04 $2,026,852.00 $2,243,293.08$2,772,468.60 % Discount allowed Village for payment 1% N/B N/13 N/B N/B N/13 N/13 made by 20th day of following month. Yard Material Collection & Disposal Sinale.-Farmily - Curbside fee per bag! 1.29 1.30 1.31 2.02 1.98 1.44 1.93 bundle/container; estimated quantities: Bags/Containers: 129,000 Bundles: 40,000 Bundled brush9pLA Ho - Single-family _ 13,425 0.73 1.64 1.31 0.57 0.52 N/A 0.75 monthly fee for unlimited curbside bundled brush collection - 12 month billing period. Bid no 50150 split under modified volume based service VJL ISWBID94.XLS] 3/18/94 Long Form Page 5 Village of Mount Prospect Year 2 Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 7th bid opening and current solid waste services billing Arc Sexton Lakilaw Waste M1g Nofthst*m Groot Browning -Fear's Disposal Disposal waste systems Northwest Waste Control Recydinqffasle Industries Service Options MiLe Goods Collection - Cost per N/A 15.00 22.00 25.00 31.50 25.00 32.00 25.00 item including collection/processing/ disposal - billed direct to user. Anal ftmlabLe - Amount to be added to monthly unit/toter fee or if none indicate N/C (no charge). Plastics (#3, 5, 6, 7) N/C N/C N/C NIA N/C N/A 0.30 Car Batteries N/C N/A NIC - dropoff NIA N/C N/A N/C Motor Oil N/A 1.20/gal N/A NIA N/A N/A 0.80 Scrap Metal N/C NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A R -qs� u abus qGoods H - Amount to be _ N/C N/A N/C N/C 0.09 N/A N/A added to monthly single-family basic service or modified volume base fee or if none indicate N/C (no charge) SWANCC Tipping Fee; total single and 1,045,920.00 1,045,920.00 1,045,920.00 1,045,920.00 1,045,920.00 1,045,920.00 1,045,920.00 multifamily (24,000 tons estimated @ 43.58 per ton) VJL lSWB1D94.XLSl 3/18/94 Long Form Page 6 Village of Mount Prospect Year 3 Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 7th bid opening and current solid waste services billing Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste Mig Northshore Groot Browning-Ferris WO -101 Disposal Waste Systems Northwest " Waste Control Recyclinuffaste Industries Basic Service _ gle-Family Rehis - Annual fee for 13,425 $ 581,571.00 $ 678,231.00 $ 697,56100 $ 1,008,486.00 $ 973,044.00 $ 1,557,837.00 $ 1,477,287.00 curbside refuse collection/transportation service per residential unit - SWANCC waste - no tipping fee included (once a week service) - No container limit -S inglp-Ea[nily recycling - Annual fee for 13,425 356,031.00 539,685-00 513,909.00 428,526.00 692,730.00 422,082.00 636,345.00 once a week basic service; includes 50/50 split of recycling revenue. Recycling includes the following materials: aluminum food & beverage containers; linlbi-metallsteel cans including aerosol cans; clear and colored glass bottleslcontainers; all HDPE & PETE plastic containers; corrugated cardboard; telephone books; mixed paper, magazines, chipboard, milk cartons, drink boxes, formed aluminum food containers. Single Family Subtotal $ 937,602.00 $ 1, 217, 916.00 $ t, 211, 472.00 $ 1, 437, 012.00 $ 1, 665, 774.00 $ 1,979,919.00 $ 2,113,632.00 u x Collection - MW fffam iLy_Rgf_ �r 7,892 201,438.48 562,260.12 524,344-56 420,660.12 495,305.40 615,386.40 535,257.48 Annual cost; SWANCC waste; no tipping fee included Multifamily Re_cXdjng - Annual Toter Fee; 4,265 24,887.40 45,700.44 119,440.68 78,285.24 7,396.68 75,197.76 121,488.00 includes 50/50 split of recycling revenues; same items as single-family Lggycr�inq - Annual Curbside Multifiamily R 335 8,884.20 13,467.00 12,823.80 10.693.20 17,286.00 10,532.40 15,879.00 Fee - including 50150 split of recycling revenues; same items as single-family Multifamily Subtotal $ 235,210.08 $ 621,427.56 $ 656,609.04 $ 509,638.56 $ 519,988.08 $ 701,116.56 $ 672,624.48 Basic Service Single/Multifamly Combined Total 21,317 $ 1,172,812.08 $ 1,839,343.56 $ 1,868,081.04 $ 1,946,650.56 $ 2,185,762.08 $ 2,681,035.56 $ 2,786,256.48 Includes tipping fees - These figures reflect bids with no recycling revenue split; contractor keeps all revenues generated by recycling, VJL [SW13ID94,XL5] 3/18194 Long Form Page 7 VJL lSW81D94.XLSl 3/18/94 Long Form Page 8 Village of Mount Prospect Year 3 Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 71h bid opening and current solid waste services billing F Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste M1g Northshore Groot . . ........... Browning-Ferris Disposal Disposal Waste Syst m-s Northwest Waste Control Recyclifulwaste Industries Modified Volume Based Service 5jngLe-Family Refuse-Annul e 13,425 902,160.00 1,184,085.00 1,118,034.00 1,367,739.00 1,569,114.00 1,631,943.00 2,207,070.00 two 32-gallon containers/bulk items, 3 cleanup weeks, recycling; SWANCC waste - no tipping fee included (once a week service) Modified Volume Based Unit Cost for N/A 0.65 1.05 1.38 1.06 1.95 1.51 1.69 each container/bag/bundle or bulk item not covered by monthly fee. Unit cost is for collection, transportation, and disposal at SWANCC site; all SWANCC waste; no tipping fee included. (Estimated quantity: 64,600 units) Modified Volume Based Single/ Multifamily Combined Total 21,317 $ 1,137,370.08 1,805,512.56 $ 1,774,643.04 $ 1,877,377.56 $ 2,089,102.08 $ 2,333,059.56 $ 2,879,694.48 % Discount allowed Village for payment 1% NIB NIB NIB NIB NIB NIB made by 20th day of following month. Yard Material Collection & Disposal 5jJn_gj1--_-E_am1ly - Curbside fee per bag/ 1.35 1.40 1.38 2.08 2.05 1.51 2.03 bundle/container; estimated quantities: Bags/Containers: 129,000 Bundles: 40,000 -Bundled brush option - Single -family 13,425 0.77 1.77 1.38 0.59 0.55 N/A 0.85 monthly fee for unlimited curbside bundled brush collection - 12 month billing period. Bid no 50/50 split under modified volume based service VJL lSW81D94.XLSl 3/18/94 Long Form Page 8 VJL ISWBID94.XLS] 3118/94 Long Form Page 9 Village of Mount Prospect Year 3 Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 71h bid opening and current solid waste services billing Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste MIg NmMOore Groot Browning-Ferris sposaf Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control in- erste Industries Service Options white Good Collection - Cost per N/A 15.00 24.00 25.00 33.00 25.00 35.00 30.00 item including collection/processing/ disposal - billed direct to user. AdgfiLJQp_4tB"c d&qa - Amount to be added to monthly unit/toter fee or if none indicate NIC (no charge). Plastics (#3, 5, 6, 7) NIC NIC NIC N/A NIC N/A 0.40 Car Batteries NIC N/A NIC - dropoff NIA NIC N/A NIC Motor Oil N/A 1.30/gal N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.90 Scrap Metal NIC N/A N/A NIA NIA N/A Reusable House Goods - Amount to be NIC N/A NIC NIC 0.11 N/A N/A added to monthly single-family basic service or modified volume base fee or if none indicate NIC (no charge) SWANCC Tipping Fee; total single and 1,133,760.00 1,133,760.00 1,133,760.00 1,133,760.00 1,133,760.00 1,133,760.00 1,133,760.00 multifamily (24,000 tons estimated @ 47.24 per ton) VJL ISWBID94.XLS] 3118/94 Long Form Page 9 Village of Mount Prospect Total Refuse Collection Costs Costs projected from March 71h bid opening and current solid waste services billing Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste MIg Northshore Groot Browning-Ferfis DiWaf Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control Reqdingffasle Industries Three Year Basic Service Single/Multifamly Combined Total $ 3,338,303.88 $ 5,176,481.76 $ 5,355,120.24 $ 5,670,198.60 $ 6,365,667.72 $ 7,736,406.60 $ 8,031,322.80 Three Year Modified Volume Based Single/ Multifamily Combined Total $ 3,204,590.88 $ 5,081,432.76 $ 5,074,806.24 $ 5,468,823.60 $ 6,086,964.72 $ 6,731,142,60 $ 8,322,913.80 Total Three Year Estimated SWANCC Tipping Fees $ 3,150,480.00 $ 3,150,480.00 $ 3,150,480.00 $ 3,150,480.00 $ 3,150,480.00 $ 3,150,480.00 $ 3,150,480.00 VJL ISWBID94.XLS) 3/18/94 Long Form Page 19 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation & Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, 9994 @ 10:OOAM VJL jSWB1D94.XLSj 3/14/94 Long Form Page 1 Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste M1g Northshore Groot &owning-Ferds Rex Disposal Oispasal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control Reqyclinplftsle Industries Disposal Part 1: Refuse Collection and Disposal A. Basic Service 1. Single -Family -Monthly fee for curbside refuse collection/transportation service per residential unit - SWANCC Year 1 3.28 3.61 3.93 5.90 5.69 8.94 8.61 No bid waste - no tipping fee included (once a Year 2 3,44 3.90 4.13 6.08 5.86 9.30 8-89 week service) [Page 55] Year 3 3.61 4.21 4.33 6.26 6.04 9s67 9.17 2. Multifamily Refuse Collection Service Once a week - Year 1 Fee/Schedule (cost per month; 1 cu. yd, 5.22 15-67 20.00 14.68 15.77 28.64 30.44 containers supplied by contractor- 1.5 cu. yd. 7.83 23.51 24.51 18.27 22.59 30,41 34.45 SWANCC waste; no tipping fee 2 cu. yd. 10.44 31.35 29.33 21-85 29.41 32.91 39.49 included) [Pages 55-56] 4 cu. yd. 20.88 62.70 38.80 43.34 56-69 42.25 60.06 6 cu. yd. 31.32 94.05 46.06 57.67 8198 51.07 73-30 8 cu. yd. 41,76 125.40 65.80 72.00 111.26 60.63 86.08 10 cu. yd. 52.20 156.75 82.58 86.32 138.54 69.24 97.81 Twice a week - Year I I cu. yd, 10.44 31.35 37.90 29.36 29.41 54.93 42.29 1.5 cu. yd, 15=66 47.02 47.48 36.54 43.05 58.51 5029 2 cu. yd. 20.88 62.70 57.08 43.70 56,69 62.83 59.30 4 cu. yd. 41.76 125.40 76.01 86.68 111.26 79.43 92.43 6 cu. yd. 62.64 188.10 90,53 115.34 165.82 95.52 111.10 8 cu. yd, 83.52 250:79 129.55 144.00 220.39 11233 12932 10 cu. yd. 104.40 313.49 162.44 172.64 274.95 128520 146.43 VJL jSWB1D94.XLSj 3/14/94 Long Form Page 1 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation & Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, 1994 @ 10:OOAM 77.83 -47-84 118.72 18954 224.51 259.00 Y§�]2-8 Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste Mtg Northshore Groot Browning-Ferris Rex i _WM D at ispos Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control RecOing(Waste Industries Disposa] J 39.15 117.56 121.01 _70.34 91.35 Three times a week - Year I 142.82 2 cu. yd. 52.20 1 cu. yd. 15.66 47.02 57.72 44.04 43.05 81.22 54.14 No bid 1.5 cu. yd. 23.50 70.54 71.99 54.81 63.51 86.22 66.18 2 cu. yd. 31.32 94.05 86.41 65.55 83-98 92.75 79.10 4 cu. yd. 62.64 188-10 114.80 130.02 165,82 116.61 12480 6 cu. yd. - -6c"d. 93.96 282.14 136.58 173.01 247.67 139.96 148.90 72.01 125.28 376.19 195-34 216.00 329.51 164.03 172.54 10 cu. yd 156.60 470.24 245.03 258.96 411.36 187.17 195.05 Four times a week - Year I 1 cu, yd, 20.88 62.70 77.54 58.72 56.69 107.40 65.98 1.5 cu. yd. -cu. 31.32 94.05 -96.50 73.08 83.98 114.72 81.99 2 yd. 41.76 125.40 115.73 87.40 111.26 122.66 98.91 4 cu. yd. 8152 250.79 153.59 173.36 220.39 153.79 157.17 6 cu. yd. 125.28 376.19 182.63 230.68 329.51 18440 186.70 cu. yd. 167.04 501.59 261.14 288.00 438.64 21-5.74 215.77 10 cu. yd. 208.80 626.46- 327.61 345.28 547.77 246.14 243.66 77.83 -47-84 118.72 18954 224.51 259.00 Y§�]2-8 Five times a week - Year I Once a week - Year 2 I cu. yd- -cu. 26.10 78.37 97.36 73.40 21.00 133.79 1=5 yd, 39.15 117.56 121.01 _70.34 91.35 104.44 142.82 2 cu. yd. 52.20 156.75 145.05 109.25 138.54 152.58 4 cu. yd. 104.40 313.49 192,39 21-06- 274,95 190.97- 6 cu. yd. 156.60 470-24 228.69 288.35- 411.36 228.84 8 cu. yd. 206-.80 626.98 326.93 360-00 547.77 267-44 10 c . yd_ 261.00 783-73 410.19 43--1.6-0 684.18 305.10 77.83 -47-84 118.72 18954 224.51 259.00 Y§�]2-8 VJL [SW8ID94-XLS) 3/14/94 Long Form Page 2 Once a week - Year 2 1 cu. yd. 5.64 16.32 21.00 15.12 16.24 29.79 32.57 1.6cu- yd, 8.45 v 24.49 25-74 18.82 23.27 31.63 36.86 2 cu. yd, 11.27 32.65 30-79 22.51 30.29 34.23 42.25 4 cu. yd, 22.55 65.30 40.74 44.64 58.39 43.94 64.26 6 cu. yd. 33M 97.94 48.36 59.40 86.50 53.11 78.43 8 cu. yd. 4510 130.59 69.09 74.16 114.60 63.06 - 92.11 10 cu. yd, 5637 163.24 86.71 88.91 142.70 72.01 104.66 VJL [SW8ID94-XLS) 3/14/94 Long Form Page 2 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation & Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, 1994 @ 10:OOAM VJL [SWBID94.XLS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 3 Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste MIg Northshore Groot 8towning-Fertis Rex DislMal Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control Recydingleste Industries Disposal Twice a week - Year 2 1 cu. yd. 11.28 32.65 39.79 30.24 30.29 57.13 45.25 No bid 1.5 cu. yd. 16.90 48,97 49.85 37.64 44.34 60.85 53.81 2 cu. yd. 22.54 65.30 59.94 45.01 58.39 65.3-4 63.45 cu. yds 45.10 130--.59 79.81 89.28 114.60 82.61 98.90 6 cu. yds 67.64 195.89 95 05 118.80 170.80 99.34 -- 118--88 8 cu. yd. 90.20 261.19 136.02 148.32 227.00 116.82 138-88 10 cu. yd. 112.74 326.48 170.56 177.82 28120 133.32- 156M Three times a week - Year 2 1 cu. yd, 16.92 48.97 60.60 45.36 44.34 84.47 57.-93 1.5 cu. yd. 25.35 73.46 75.69 56.45 65.42 90.08 70.81 2 cu. yd. 33.81 97.94 90.73 67.52 86.50 96,46 84.64 4 cu, yd. 67.65 195,89 120-54 133.92 170M 121-27 13154 6 cu. yd. 101.46 293.83 143-41 178.20 255,10 145.56 159£32 8 cu. yd, 135.30 391.78 205.10 222.48 339.40 1-70.59 184M 10 cu. yd. 169.10 489.72 257.28 266.73 423,70 194.66 208.70 Four times a week - Year 2 1 cu. yd, 22.56 65.30 81-41 60.48 58.39 111.80 70.60 1.5 cu. yd. 3180 97.94 101.32 75.27 86-50 119-31 87.73 2 cu. yd, 45.08 130.59 121.52 90-02 114.60 127.57 105.83 4 cu. yd. 90.20 261.19 16127 178.56 227-00 159.94 168.17 6 cu. yd. 135.28 391.78 191.76 2-3-7.60 339.40 191.78 19938 8 cu. yd, 180.40 522.37 274.19 296.64-451.80 224.37 230,87 10 cu. yd. 225.48 652.96 343,99 355.64 564.20 255.99 260.72 Five times a week - Year 2 1 cu. yd, 28.20 81.62 102.23 75.60 72.45 139.14 83.28 1.5 cu. yd. 42.25 122.43 127.06 94.09 107.57 148.53 104.69 2 cu. yd. 56.35 163-24 152.31 112-53 142-70 158.68 127.03 4 cu. yd, 112.75 326.48 202401 223.20 283.20 198.61 202.81 IEcu. yd. 169.10 489.72 240.12 29700 423.70 23-7.46- 240.12 yd, 225.50 652.96 343.2�-7 370.80 564.20 278.14 277.13 10 cu. yd. 281.85 816-21 430.70 444.55 704.71 317.30-312.74 VJL [SWBID94.XLS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 3 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation & Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, 1994 @ 10:OOAM Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste MIg Northshore Groot Browning-Ferris Rex sposlal Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control Recce nglWante 'Industries Disw VJL [SWBID94.XLS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 4 Three times a week - Year 3 Once a week - Year 3 1 cu. yd, _yd. 1 cu. yd. _ 6.08 16.97 22.05 15.57 16.73 30.98 34.85 No bid 1.5 cu. ii - 9.12 25.46 27.03 19.38-- 23.97 32.90 39.44 2 cu. yd- 12.16 33.95 32.33 23.19 31.20 35.60 45.12 4 cu. yd, 24.34- 67.89 42.78 45.98 60.15 45-76 68-76 6 cu. yd. 36.50 101.84 50.78 61.18 89.09 55.23 83.92 8 cu. yd. 48-68 135.79 72.54 78.38 118.03 65.58 98.55 10 cu. yd. 66i_65 16934 91.05 91.58 146.98 74.89 111.98 VJL [SWBID94.XLS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 4 Three times a week - Year 3 Twice a week - Year 3 1 cu. yd, _yd. I cu. yd. 12.16 33.95 41.79 31.15 31.20 59.42 48.42 I 18.24 50.92 52.34 38.77 45.68 63.28 57.58 2 cu. yd. 24.32 67.8962.94 69,55 46.36 60.15 67.95 67.89 4 cu. yd, 48.68 1-5.79 83.80 91.96 118.03 85.91 105.82 6 cu. yd. 73.00 203.68 99.80 122.36 175.92 1-03.31 127.20 8 cu. yd. 97.36 271.58 142.82 152.77 233,81 121.49 147.96 10 cu. yd, 121.70 339.47 179.09 183.15 291.70 138.65 167.65 VJL [SWBID94.XLS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 4 Three times a week - Year 3 1 cu. yd, _yd. 18.24 50.92 63.63 46.72 45.68 87.85 61.99 T5_cu. 27.36 ....... 76.38 79.37 58.14 67.38 93.68 75.77 cu. yd, 36.48. 161.84 95.27 69,55 89.09 100.32 90.56 4 cu. yd, 73.00 203.68 126.57 137.94 175.92 126.12 142.88 6 cu. yd. -cu. 109.50 305.52 150.58 183-.5-5- 262.75 151.38 1 170.48 8 cu. yd. 146.04 407.37 215.36 229.15 349.58 177.41 197.54 10 cu. yd. 182.55 509.21 270.14 274.73 43&41 202.45 223.31 VJL [SWBID94.XLS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 4 Four times a week - Year 3 1 cu. yd. 24.32 67.89 85.48 62.29 60.15 116.27 75.54 1 .5 cu. yd. 36.48 101.84 106.39 77.53 89.09 124.08 9187 2 cu. yd. 46.64 135.79 127.60 92.72 118.03 132.67 113.24 4 cu. yd. 97.36 271,58 169.33 183-92 233.81 166.34 179.94 6 cu. yd. -cu. 146.00 -19 407.37 201.35 244.73 349.58 199.45 213.75 yd. 4.72 543.16 - 287.90 30554 465.36 233.34 247 1 .04 1_0 cu. yd. 243,40 678.94 361.19 366.31 581.13 266.23 278.97 VJL [SWBID94.XLS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 4 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation & Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, '1994 @ 10:OOAM VJL ISWBID94.XLS) 3/14/94 Long Form Page 5 Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste Mig Northshore Groot Browning-Ferris Rex Bis al Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control ReudinglWaste - Industries is s Five times a week - Year 3 1 cu. yd. 30.40 84.87 107.34 77.87 74.62 144.71 89.11 No bid 1.5 cu. yd. 45.60 -60-,80 127.30 133.41 i-1 10.80 154.47 112.02 2 cu. yd. 169.74 -339--.47 159.93 115.91 146.98 165.03 135.92 4 cu. yd. 121.76-- 212.11 229-.90- 291.70 206.55 217.00 6 cu. yd. 182-50 509.21 252.13 305.91 43-6-412-47-.5-0 256-93 8 cu. yd. 24_3_.40 678.94 360.43 381.92 581.13 289.27 296353 10 cu. yd. 304.25 848.68 452.24 4-5789-72-5.85 329.99 334,63 5. % Discount allowed Village for payment Year 1 1.00% N/A 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% made by 20th day of following month - Year 2 1.00% N/A 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%_ Article IX Par. D. [Page XX] Year 3 1.00% N/A 0.00% -0.00% 0.00% 0,00% 0.00% 0.000/0 6. Optional Direct Billing Fee - Cost per item including collection, processing and Year 1 0.10 0.62 0.63 0.50 0.62 1.25 1.05 disposal. Charges to be billed direct to Year 2 0.10 0.65 0.66 0.50 0.64 1.35 1,05 resident. Year 3 0.10 0.68 0.69 0.50 0.67 1.45 1.05 B. Special Services 1, White Goods Collection Fee - Cost per item including collection, processing Year 1 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 25.00 30.00 20.00 and disposal. Charges to be billed direct Year 2 15.00 22.00 25.00 31.50 25.00 32-00 25.00 to resident. [Page 571 Year 3 15.00 24.00 25.00 33.00 25.00 35.00 30.00 2. Back Door Service - Monthly additional surcharge for providing rear door refuse, Year 1 20.00 10.83 10.00 9.00 4.25 6.00 18.00 recycling & yard material service; charge Year 2 20.50 11.70 10.50 9.50 4.50 6.50 2100 to be billed direct to resident. Year 3 21.00 12.63 11:02 10.00 4.75 7.00 24.00 VJL ISWBID94.XLS) 3/14/94 Long Form Page 5 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation & Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, 1994 @ 1 O:OOAM 3. Unit cost for each container, bag, bundle Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste Mtg Northshore Groot Browning-Fenis Rex oitsjposm Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control Re4ldinWast& Industries Disposal Part II: Alternate #1 - Modified Volume Based Collection transportation and disposal at SWANCC Year 1 0.55 A. Refuse CollectionfTransportation/DisposaI 1.25 1.00 1.75 1.38 1.58 site; all SWANCC waste. No tipping fee Year 2 0.60 0.97 1= Modified Volume Based System - Single- 1.03 1.85 1.44 1.63 to be included. [Page 57] Year 3 0.65 1.05 1.38 family monthly fee, including refuse/ 1.95 1.51 1.69 Part III: Alternate #2 - Pure Volume -Based Collection recycling/bulk items and two (2) clean-up A. Refuse Collectionrrransportation/DisposaI weeks. SWANCC waste: no tipping fee Year 1 4.95 * *O:30 * 6.29 8.00 9.18 9.36 12.88 No'bid to be included (once a week service) Year 2 5.26 * *6.80 * 6.61 8.24 9.46 9.74 13.28 [Page 57] Year 3 5.6_0"'7.35 -include a 6.94 8-49 9.74 1 - 0.13 13.70 TP-ricesi6t-ed no 501-5-0sp11t-of-re-cycliung revenue 2. Optional Modified Volume Based 1.21 1.20 1 £42 1.97 2.19 N/A 2.22 (see note). SWANCC waste; no tipping Year 2 System - single family monthly fee. Year 1 4.95 6,30 * 6.33 8.25 9.39 9.46 13.10 Same as #1 above with three (3) clean-up Year 2 5.26 6_._80 * 6=65 8.50 9.67 9.64- 13.50 weeks. [Page 57] Year 3 5.60 7.35 * 6.98 8.76 9.96- 10.23 13-.93 comparison purposes '_Pric_es stated Includeno50/50 splitof-recycliungrevenue made - letter to be submitted. 3. Unit cost for each container, bag, bundle or bulk item not covered by monthly fee in #1 or #2. Unit cost is for collection, transportation and disposal at SWANCC Year 1 0.55 0.90 1.25 1.00 1.75 1.38 1.58 site; all SWANCC waste. No tipping fee Year 2 0.60 0.97 1.31 1.03 1.85 1.44 1.63 to be included. [Page 57] Year 3 0.65 1.05 1.38 1.06 1.95 1.51 1.69 Part III: Alternate #2 - Pure Volume -Based Collection A. Refuse Collectionrrransportation/DisposaI 1- Pure Volume Based System: single family pay -by -bag 'system including all basis service refuse colection/ transportation, recycling, and three (3) clean-up weeks fee per bag/container Year 1 1.21 1.20 1 £42 1.97 2.19 N/A 2.22 (see note). SWANCC waste; no tipping Year 2 1.27 1.30 1.49 2.03 2.25 N/A 2.29 fees included. Year 3 1.41 1.40 1.57 2.09 2.32 N/A 2.36 Note: Unit cost submitted is contractors cost per the specification. To this price the Village will add the topin, g fee, administration and commission fee which will then determine the sticker selling price. Hauler made a verbal request that adjustment be made to Part II, 1A due to error in pricing submitted; cost of recycling should have been added. For comparison purposes adjustment was made - letter to be submitted. VJL 1SWBID94ALS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 6 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation,& Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, 1994 @ 10:OOAM Are Sexton Laidlaw Waste Mtg Northshore Groot Disposal Disposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control Recwtina4 Part IV: Yard Material Collection and Disposal A. Yard Material Collection/Disposal Curbside fee per bag, container or bundle. Year 1 1.23 1.20 1.25 1.96 1.93 (Village administers sticker sales revenues Year 2-1.29 N/A 1.30 1.31 2.02 1.98 [Page 58] Year 3 1.35 1.40 1.38 a- 2-.05 Village sells -stickers and hauler -recei . ves revenue based on number of slickers B. Brush - Option #1 Single-family monthly fee for curbside Year 1 0.70 1.52 1.25 0.55 0.50 brush collection/disposal service. (Based Year 2 0.73 i_. 6- 4 1.31 0.57 0.52 on 12 -month billing period) [Page 58] Year 3 0.77 1.77 1.38 0.59-0.55 Limit 4 bundles per week per unit C. Yard Materials - Option #2 Curbside Fee per Bag, Container or Year 1 1.25 1.30 1.28 1.66 2.12 Bundle (Contract retains sticker sales Year 2 1.31 1.40 1.34 1.71 2.18 revenues - see note) Year 3 1.38 1.52 1.41 1.76 2.25 Note: Added to this price would be the Village administration fee and retailer commission as set by the Village to establish the final per sticker selling price to the resident. Part V: Recyclable Material Collection A. Single Family 1. Single-family - once a week basic service Year 1 2.00 N/A 2.94 N/A 4.05 fee per unit per month. Includes 50/50 Year 2 2.10 N/A 3.06 N/A 4.17 split of recycling revenue. [Page 59] Year 3 2.21 N/A 3.19 N�k 4.30 2. Single-family - Once a week basic service fee per unit per month. QqeAlu Qtj n JA qdg Year 1 1.85 2.87 2.45 2.50 3.75 revenue-salit; conftagAor-keels 1.94 3.10 2.57 2.58 3.86 fevenues. Year 2.04 3.35 2.70 2.66 3.98 Browning-Ferris Rex I Industries Disposal 1.38 1.83 No bid 1.44 1.93 1.51 2.03 N/A 0.70 N/A 0.75 N/A 0.85 1.53 1.6_0 1.67 _N/A N/A NIA 2.42 2.52 i-6-2 1.78 1.88 1.98 3.73 184 3.95 3.59 3.70 3.81 VJL 1SWBID94ALS) 3/14/94 Long Form - Page 7 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation & Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, 1994 @ 10:OOAM 3. Optional - Additional recyclables: if added to basic service list of items, amount to be added to fee in #1 and #2 above or if no increase indicate "No Charge". Plastics (#3,5,6,7) Car Batteries Motor Oil Scrap Metal B. Multifamily 1. Multifamily - monthly fee per 90 gallon toter; includes 50/50 split of recycling revenues [Page 591 Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste Mig Northshore Groot Sposial Usposal Waste Systems Northwest Waste Control ReaeckwA� Browning-Ferris Rex Industries Dknw Year 1 Year 2 N/C N/C N/C N/C N/A N/C N/A 0.25 No bid Year 3 NIC N/C N/C NIC N/C N/A N/C N/A 0.30 NIA 44.73 NIA 2.58 N/A N/A N/CN/A 6.65 0.40 Year 1 N/C N/A N/C - dropoff N/A N/C N/A N/C Year 2 N/A N/C - dr of N/A N/C N/A N/C Year 3 N/C N/A N/C - dropo /A N/C A���N/C l4j7 N/A Year 1 N/A 1.00/gal N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.75 Year 2 _3 N/A 1 20/gal N/A A NZA Wk '0 Year N/A 13301ga1 N/A NIA N/A N/A .80 0.90 Year I N/C N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Year 2 N/C N/A N/A N/A NIA N/A Year 3 NIC: N/A N/A N/A NA �NjA See recce abfes list in proposal Once a week service Year 1 5.35 N/A 22.50 N/A 1.50 N/A 24.00 Year 2 5.62 N/A 23.57 NIA 1.55 N/A 25.00 Year 3 5.90 N/A 24-69 N/A 1.59 N/A 26.00 VJL 1SWBID94ALS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 8 Twice a week service Year 1 6.04 N/A 42.71 N/A 2.50 N/A 42.00 Year 2 6.34 NIA 44.73 NIA 2.58 N/A 4100 Year 3 6.65 N/A 46.85 N/A 2.65 N/A 44.00 Three times a week service Year 1 6.83 N/A 63.84 N/A 3.75 N/A 60.00 Year 2 7.17 N/A 66x87 NA 3.86 N/A 5200. Year 3 7.53 N/A 70.05 N/A 3.98 N/A 64.60- VJL 1SWBID94ALS] 3/14/94 Long Form Page 8 Village of Mount Prospect Solid Waste Collection, Transportation & Disposal Bid Opening - March 7, 1994 @ 10:OOAM Arc Sexton Laidlaw Waste NO AInrth.,zhnrP rrnnI Arnwninn-PArric Pav 2. Multifamily - monthly fee per 90 gallon Year 1 4.95 toter; dogs not incl. de terMfing Lay_Qnug Year 2 5.20 uld - C-opdfag-1keeps-am-&: itaev , u , Year 3 5,45 g Year 1 560 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Part VI: Reusable Household Goods As Additional fee to be added to single-family monthly fee under refuse basic service or Year 1 modified volume base system; if none Year 2 write "No Charge". Year B. Additional fee to be added to per bag fee Year I in complete volume base system. Year 2 1.25 Year 3 5.90 6.20 6.32 66-5 6.95 N/C NIA Once a week service N/C 0.07 7.84 21.42 15.00 1.25 14.32 8.46 22.49 15.45 1.29 14.90 9.14 23.61 15.91 1,33 15.49 N/C N/C Twice a week service N/A N/C 16.46 40.55 30.00 2.25 27.47 i-7-.7742.57 N/A 30.90 2.32 28.57 19.19 44.69 31.83 2.53 29.72 Three limes a week service 24.70 60.60 45.00 2.50 40.61 26_65 63.63 46.35 2.58 42.24 28.79 66.81 47.74 2.65 43.93 N/C NIA N/C N/C 0.07 N/A N/C N/A NIC N/C 0.09 "1 N/C N/A N/C N/C 0.11 N/A N/C NIA N/C N/C 0.02 N/A N/C N/A N/C kic 0.03 N/A_ N/C N/A N/C N/C 0.04 N/A 22.00 No bid 23.00 24.0) 40.00 41.00 42.00 58.00 60.00 62.00 N/A k/_A_ N/A N/A ki-A N/A VJL [SWBID94.XLS] 3/14194 Long Form Page 9