HomeMy WebLinkAbout1307_001Next Ordinance No. 4663
Next Resolution No. 31-94
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor
Mount Prospect Senior Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
DEPUTY VILLAGE CLERK
ALL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
August 16, 1994
7:30 P. M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip.. Farley
Trustee George Clowes, Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy, Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Richard Hendricks Trustee Irvana Wilks
INVOCATION - Trustee Hendricks
IV. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, August 2, 1994
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
VI. MAYOR'S REPORT
vil. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION
OF A CERTAIN QUESTION TO THE ELECTORS OF THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT,, ILLINOIS
Pursuant to a request of the Mount Prospect Public Library Board,
this Ordinance authorizes a referendum question to be placed on the (Exhibit A)
ballot for the November 8, 1994 election.
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
(ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR DEALERS)
This Ordinance amends the Village Code as it relates to (Exhibit B)
alcoholic beverages.
C. ZBA 31 -CU -94, 101 East Rand Road
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 101 EAST RAND ROAD
This Ordinance grants a Conditional Use to allow a ground -
mounted radio tower exceeding 70 feet in height. The Zoning
Board of Appeals voted 3-1 to deny this request. (Exhibit C)
IX NEW BUSINESS
A. Meier Road Subdivision (Mc Kone Builders)
1.Request for modification from the Development Code
relative, to lot, depth on 3, lots.
L. Request for modification from the Development 'Code
relative to radius' of cul de sac bulb
The Plan Commission recommended granting these requests by
a vote, of 8-0.
B. ZBA 29 -CU -94, Home Depot (Randhurst, Shopping Center)
The Petitioner is requesting an amendment from the Planned
Unit Development governing Randhurst Shopping Center to allow the
removal of the Child -World Building and the Wards Auto Center and
to allow the construction of a new retail store and auto center. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a
a vote of 5-1 and one abstention.
C. ZBA 33-V-94, 800 W. Lonnquist Boulevard
The Petitioner has withdrawn this request for a variation to permit an
interior side yard setback of 3 feet, rather than the required 5 feet.
D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V
OF CHAPTER 21 (BUILDING CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance amends the regulations relative to cross connections. (Exhibit D)
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IV OF
CHAPTER 22 (WATER AND WATER SUPPLY) OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF -MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance establishes cross -connection regulations pursuant
to the requirements of State agencies,
i (Exhibit E)
F. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF
CHAPTER 22 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
ThisOrdinance allows the Village to sell water to other governmental
entities ' s through an Intergovernmental Agreement at a rate to be
agreed upon between the entities. (Exhibit F)
G. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance increases the $4,000 limit for purchasing without
going out for competitive bid to $10,000.
H. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF
CHAPTER 4 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance authorizes the Finance Director to sell Village
owned property without an authorizing Ordinance when the
value of the property is determined to be $100.00 or less.
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. Shade trees for Village parkways
2. Demolish One South Emerson Street
3. I-Oka/Sunset Reconstruction
B. Proposals for computer software
C. Status Report
X1. TRUSTEE COMMENTS
XII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
(Exhibit G)
(Exhibit H)
CALL TO ORDER
687,965
Mayor Farley called the
meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
61430
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Gerald L. Farley
Water & Sewer Fund
Trustee George Clowes
Parking System Revenue Fund
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Risk Management Fund
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Vehicle Replacement Fund
Trustee Richard Hendricks
Capital Improvement Fund
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Absent:
Trustee Irvana Wilks
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Mayor Farley.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor
and Board of Trustees held July 19, 1994.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks,
Hoefert, Skowron
Nays: None
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved t(k,
approve the following list of bills:
General Fund $
687,965
Refuse Disposal Fund
237,142
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
61430
Community Development Block Grant Fund
2,875
Water & Sewer Fund
80,806
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,270
Risk Management Fund
102,024
Vehicle Replacement Fund
521,288
Capital Improvement Fund
10,932
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
7,208
Police & Fire Building Const.
Flood Control Construction Fund
EPA Flood Loan Construction Fund
4,565
Street Improvement Construction Fund
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
35,024
Police Pension Fund
79,484
Firemen's Pension Fund
75,994
Benefit Trust Fund
I"
$13853,008
Upon roll call' Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran,
Hoefert, Hendricks,
Skowron
Nays: None
APPROVE
BILLS
r i • • "� M`r�� • III
• • • a • • • r • - — • •
•
COMMUNICATIONS TO E aim
SCHOOL BLDGS.
Ronald Fascia, 1008 W. Eva, asked about the areas of responsibility
relative to remodeling and/or construction of new schools.
OLD BUSINESS
CENTEL RATE
A Resolution was presented that would support efforts to overturn the
INCREASE
rate increase recently granted to CENTTL/ PRINT, due to the fact
that the of residents on the CENTEL system are experiencing
extremely high phone bills.
RE .NO. 29-94
TrusteeHendricks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage
of Resolution No. 29-94
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITIZENS
UTILITIES BOARD IN THEIN EFFORTS TO OVERTURN
THE DECISION OF THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE
COMMISSION RELATIVE TO THE CE JTELf PRINT
RATE INCREASE CASE
Upon roll call: Ayes. Clovwres, Corcoran, Hoefert, Hendricks,
koWron, Farley
Nays; Nene
Motion carried.
LEGAL FEES
Trustee Hendricks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to concur
with the recommendation of the 'Village Manager and authorize an
expenditure of up to $2,000 for legal fees' that may be incurred as
Page 2 - August 2, 1994
... . . ........ . . . . ................ ................ . . . ... . . . .........
part of participating in the Appeal relative to the CENTEUSPRINT
rate increase case.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clewes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Hendricks,
Skowron, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 30 -CU -94, 2312 Terminal Drive (Mobile Oil - Tank Farms) ZBA 30 -CU -94
The Petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit TANK FARMS
Development regulating the Tank Farms to allow Mobile Oil to
operate a commercial truck repair and maintenance shop. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request
by a vote of 4-1..
It was noted that each oil company operates their own truck
repair shop on site, however, in an effort to have a more
economical operation, the manager of the Mobile Oil area would
like to contract out the repairs with American Truckare. American
Truckare would like to be able to offer the same services to other
fleet vehicles, which would be parked on site overnight. The
entrance/exit to this site is on Badger Road, which is accessible
off Oakton Street.
While staff did- not recommend approving this request, they did
offer the following conditions in the event the Village Board
concurred with the Zoning Board of Appeals and granted the
request:
1. That the Petitioner be required to install a traffic signal
at the Badger Road/Oakton Street intersection, with
all costs of the installation to be the responsibility of the
Petitioner. 11
2. The only truck trailers permitted on site would be
those being serviced by American Truckare and no
commodities or supplies shall be allowed in the trailers
at any time.
3. Terminal Drive and Badger Road shall be repaired to allow
adequate emergency access and the roads should be
raised above the floodplain, allowing emergency access
to the facility at all times.
4. All employees and drivers entering the site shall be
trained and certified in OSHA regulations for flammable
hazardous material and subsequent safety related issues.
The.. Petitioner stated that items 3 and 4 were already done, however,
there may be times when trucks are brought in for repairs with the
trailer, which would violate condition #2.
Members of the Village Board expressed concern relative to the
increased traffic that this proposed use may bring to the area, as
well as fire safety hazards.
Page 3 - August 2, 1994
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur
with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant
the Conditional Use requested in ZBA 31 -CU -94.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Farley
Nays: Hendricks
Abstain: Skowron
Motion carried,.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next meeting
of the Village Board of August 16, 1994,
ADDITIONAL CDBG Village Manager Janonis presented, for information only, plans to
FUNDS appropriate an additional $75,000 in the Community Development
Block Grant program, which would allow for all the requests
submitted to be processed. There is a balance from prior year
CDBG funds and the appropriate transfer would be made later in the
year.
The Village Board acknowledged receipt of the report on CDBG
funds.
RECESS Mayor Farley called a brief recess at 9:50 P..
RECONVENE Mayor Farley reconvened the meeting at 10:00 P.M.
Page 4 - August 2, 1994
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Clowes
Trustee Corcoran
Trustee Hendricks
Trustee Hoefert
Trustee Skowron
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would authorize
a referendum question to be placed on the November 8, 1994
ballot, which question would be to ask the electors if they would
support an increase in the tax rate from .27 percent to .53 percent
for the renovation, expansion, maintenance and operation of the
Library building.
Trustee Clowes asked that reference be made in the Ordinance that
the Library Board had requested the Village Board to have this question
placed on the ballot. The, Ordinance will be so amended.
Hendricks asked that the wording in the referendum question be
changed to reference the actual dollar amount of $15.5 million
anticipated for this improvement. It was explained that the State
Statutes set forth the wording required in order to raise the tax
rate.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading on August 16th.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would amend
Article XVI (Utility Tax) of Chapter 8 of the Village Code to include
language requested by Northern Illinois Gas.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron
Nays: Hendricks
711001���
A A
AL
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage
of Ordinance No. 4660
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVI ENTITLED
"UTILITY TAX" OF CHAPTER 8 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron
Nays: Hendricks
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would authorize
the sale of the 1982 Fire Department ladder truck to the highest
bidder.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive
the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron
Nays: Hendricks
Page 5 - August 2, 1994
W10191:01MMILOGS
ORD.NO. 4661 Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for i.. ..•
of Ordinance No. 4661 1
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZE THE SALE OF
VILLAGE OWN�ED PROPERTY
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks,
Hoefert. Skowron
Ncivs: None
d
0
W 0 loop
RENO. 30-94 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for passage
of Resolution No. 30-94
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A CONTRACT FOR SALE OF WATER BY THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO THE CITY OF
PROSPECT HEIGHTS
Upon roll call.* Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron
Nays-, Hendricks
Motion carried.
SELL PROPERTY: An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would authorize the
MISCELLANEOUS sale of miscellaneous equipment owned by the Village as part of the
EQUIPMENT AUCTION auction to be conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference on
October 15th in the Mount Prospect Public Works facilities.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron
Nays: Hendricks
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4662 Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage
of Ordinance No. 4662
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF VILLAGE
OWNED PROPERTY
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks,
Hoefert, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 6 - August 2, 1994
An Ordinance was presented that would amend Chapter 13 AMEND CH. 13
"Alcoholic Beverage Dealers". Ordinances have been presented ALCOHOLIC
over the past several meetings, however, the Ordinance DEALERS
presented at this meeting incorporates all the amendments
and suggestions proposed.
The 11 proposed Ordinance included regulations governing tagging
kegs and the procedures involved with that process.
There was discussion among the Board members as to the
benefits of this section of the proposed Ordinance.
The owner of Gold Eagle Liquors stated that records are kept
now, without regulations, as to who purchases a keg, etc. and
that the proposed ordinance would require additional work
witWout a substantial benefit.
Trustee Hoefert stated that while he supports the ultimate goal
of eliminating under -age drinking, he does not support the keg
tagging regulations. It was noted that the Police Department
stated that they can identify 4 problems with kegs over the
past 4 years, which, in Trustee Hoefert's opinion did not present
a significant problem.
Trustee Corcoran stated that he would like to consider a law
making it an offense for an under -age person to "attempt" to
purchase alcohol.
Mayor Farley polled the Board in order to determine whether
there was support for the keg tagging regulations as proposed.
Mayor Farley was the only member in favor of establishing
keg tagging regulations.
The Ordinance amending Chapter 13, without the keg tagging
regulations, will be presented August 16th for second reading.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager Michael E. Janonis presented the following
bid results:
The following bids were received for the Pine/Wille infrastructure
in conjunction with the development of that area:
Bidder Amount
Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete $ 7421876.48
John Ned Construction
8351353.50
DiPaolo Co.
8521494.25
LoVerde Construction Co.
8841488.00
Lenny Hoffman Excavating
9071461.07
J. Congdon Sewer Service Inc.
957,255-75
Vincent A. DiVito
110901171.72
George W. Kennedy Construction
112933741.50
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to concur
with the recommendation of the administration and accept the
low bid submitted by Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete to install
the infrastructure improvements on Pine and Wille Street in
-TWAS10 M61
PINE/WILLE
INFRASTRUCTURE
GLENBROOK
EXCAVATING
SENIOR CENTER
PARKING LOT
TOWING CONTRACT
PROSPECT AUT#
BODY
conjunction with the development of the Clocktower Place
Condominiums an amount not to exceed $742,876.48.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks,
Hoefert, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carded.,
The following bids were received for reconstructing the parking lot at
the Senior Center:
Bidder Amount
Accu -Pave Company $931662.60
Lenny Hoffman Excavating, Inc. $98,165.30
J. A. Johnson Paving $98,980.00
DeKaf Construction, Inc. $1061952.00
J. C. Blacktop Co., Inc. $113,649.00
Abby Paving and Sealcoating $1171672.50
Bruntz Paving, Inc. $122,050.00
It was noted that $70,000 was budgeted for this project, therefore
since the bids received exceeded the budget, it was the
recommendation of the administration to reject all the bids and defer
this project until the next budget year.
Trustee Clow'es, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur
with the recommendation of the administration and reject all bids
received for the Senior Center Parking Lot Project and defer this
project until the 1996 budget year. -
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks,
Hoefert, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Village Manager Janonis presented the recommendation of the
Police Department to extend the existing contract with Prospect Auto
Body or one additional year at no increase in cost. Mr. Janonis
noted that the cost for a tow is $40.00.
Ernest Lasse asked if the towing contract was normally an item that
went out for bid. It was explained that the Village has gone out for
bid on this item and Prospect Auto Body had the best and most
reasonable package.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration and extend the
existing contract with Prospect Auto Body for towing services until
July 31, 1995.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks,.
Skowron
Nays: Hoefert
Motion carried.
Page 8 - August 2, 1994
A request was presented to waive the bidding procedure and authorize MOBILE DATA
the purchase of a mobile data terminal from Motorola Communications TERMINAL
and Electronics, "Inc. at a cost of $4,994.00. It was noted that this
terminal will be installed in a Police squad and must be compatible
with the other Motorola units presently used by all the'squad cars.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur MOTOROLA
with the recommendation of the administration to waive the bidding
procedure and authorize the purchase of a mobile date terminal from
Motorola Communications in an amount not to exceed $4,994.00. mm
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Farley
Nays: None
Pass: Hendricks
Abstain: Skowron
Motion carried.
CLOCKTOWER
The Village Manager announced the ground -breaking ceremony for PLACE GROUND
the Shires of Clock Tower Place (Pine/Wille TIF development) will BREAKING
take place on Tuesday, August 9th about 6:00 PM
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
None
TRUSTEE COMMENTS
Trustee Hendricks stated that the Army Corp of Engineers recently SWANCC
denied the request of SWANCC to create a balefill site in Bartlett
and if SWANCC is considering legal action against the Corp, he
would like the Village of Mount Prospect not to be a part of that
action. I
Trustee Hendricks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to direct
the Mount Prospect representatives to SWANCC to vote "NO" on
the subject of whether SWANCC should take legal action against
the Army Corp of Engineers.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Hendricks
Nays: Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Farley
Motion failed.
Trustee Clowes asked that the subject of SWANCC be discussed
at a future Committee of the Whole.
Trustee Clowes expressed his concern and disappointment that NURSING HOMES
approval was recently granted for a new nursing home to be
built in Elk Grove Village and to expand another nursing home
yet the State denied permission of a Petitioner to construct a
nursing home in Mount Prospect. Trustee Clowes would like
additional information as to how the State makes its determination
as to need for additional nursing/convalescent homes.
Page 9 - August 2, 1994
4
EXECUTIVE SESSION
n
EXECUTIVE Mayor Farley stated that while an Executive Session was scheduled
SESSION for the purpose of discussing fang acquisition, additional information
is necessary, therefore no Executive Session was held at this
meeting.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 12:01 A.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 10 - August 2, 1994
QtnaW & SM*al Reyme a
General Fund
Refuse Disposal Fund
Motor Fuel Tax
Community Development Block Grant
En-Wr1so Funds
i
Water & Sewer Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
late Se Funds
Risk Management Fund
Vehicle Replacement Fund
ciwiw hmiwl
Capital Improvement Fund
Downtown Redev Const Funds
Police & Fire Building Construction
Flood Control Construction Fund
EPA Flood Loan Construction Fund
Street Improvement Const Fund
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp, Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VH -4L -,AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
v.
CASH POSITION
August 11, 1994
Cash& Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
8/01/94 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
'1_ ......................
_
$ 2,816,014
$ 220t033
$ 631,422
$ 2,404,625
(401,065)
31,171
801,991
(450,885)
210,072
89,158
281,219
18,011
(5J65)
11,000
191,679
(131,844)
198599380
234,684
357,179
1P7361,885
371,879
5,310
2,372
374,0817
1,425,596
15,180
439,855
1s3969921
869,904
716
11,298
8691,322
2,797,983
321
161,845
21781 *459
480,364
221
655
4791,930
204,541
154
-
204,695
1,547,384
778
332,826
1,215,336
.
(49566)
-
-
(4t566)
4$,979v718
52
-
4,979,770
21,586,598
Loll
45,400
215421,209
6,602
5,595
18,545
(6t348)
990v888
161,806
561,583
9511,111
20,017,897
151,731
-
20,033,628
22,975,220
...219633
12,718
22,9871,938
163.948 877
$1,891
$62671,8.480
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE'AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
SCOTT ALM
COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM
$1,357.17
$975.00
$1,357.17
$975-00
BERGEN CONSTRUCTION CORP.
TREE REFUND
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$8.10
BLUE JAY CORP.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.84
$8.94
ERICH BLUM
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$8.10
$.84
$8.94
JULIE A. BOURIS
COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM
$350.00
$275.00
$350-00
$275.00
ANTONIOS BRILLAKIS
TREE REFUND
PKG LEASE REIMB,
$80.00
$80.00
LORRAINE BUEGEL
PETER CAMPBELL
OVERPMT FINAL WATER
$52.50
$5.40
$57.90
COURTYARD CONSTRUCTION
OVERPMT FINAL WATER
TREE REFUND
$3,222.00
$3,222.00
CUDA & LAPONTEr LTD.
REFUND DUP RE TR TAX
$957.00
$42.47
$957.00
FRANK CVETKAVIC
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.40
$46.87
SAM & JOANNA DAKOGIANNIS
RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE
$312.00
$
$225.00ANTHONY
DIMUCCI
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
TREE REFUND
P/R ENDING 8/04294
$460,798.25
PZR ENDING 8Z04Z94
$1t870.47
PZR ENDING 8ZO4Z94
$1,322.68
PZR ENDING 8Z04Z94
$46,929.04
P4R ENDING8�04494
$816.62
$511r737.06*
$2,001-59
BARRY EISEN
C MPUTER P.R HA E PROGRAM
$2r001-59
$16,891.62
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
JULY 94 MED BENEFIT REIMB
JULY 94 DEP CARE REIMB
$1,653.60
$18,545-22*
LIL FLOROS
REIMB POSTAGE PAID
RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE
$37.00
$368-00
$37-00
$368-00
DOUGLAS E. GILLEN
GIRL SCOUTS - ILLINOIS CROSS-
APRIL BOXWOOD ADVOCACY
$23,00-00
$2,300-00
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
METER SERVICE
$142.74
$428.22
METER SERVICE
METER SERVICE
$142.74
METER SERVICE
$285.48
$285.48
$1r284.66
JOHN HALABRIN
METER SERVICE
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$22.50
$14,625-00
$22.50
$14r625-00
HOFFMAN GROUP
HOMES BY HEMPHILL, INC.
TREE REFUND
TREE REFUND
$2,700.00
$2f700.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
DAVID JEGLUM
DAVID C. JEPSON
MICHAEL JONES
M -K SIGNS INC.
RON MAGGIORE
WALLACE P. MARTINA
MOUNT PROSPECT FIRE DEPARTMENT
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
RAY NAEGELE
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
MICHAEL NELSON
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
POSTMASTER
SCARSDALE DEVELOPMENT LTD.
ED J. SKRYSAK
DAVID STRAHL
EDWARD SZMERGALSKI
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
EMPLOYEE SHARE -JULY 94
EMPLOYER SHARE -JULY 94
RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE
COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
OVERPMT CONTRACTORS LICENSE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
DONATION
PPRT 6TH ALLOCATION
TREE REFUND
SAVINGS BONDS P 8/18/94
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 7/28
DUE TO FED DEP PZR 8Z4
DUE TO FED DEP PZR 8Z4
DUE TO FED DEP PZR 8Z4
DUE TO FED DEP PZR 6Z4
DUE TO FED DEP P(R 8/4
PMT INS CLAIMS-CaWFORD
COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM
MISC EXPENES
MISC EXPENES
POSTAGE METER ADVANCE DEPOSIT
POSTAGE
TREE REFUND
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM
COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM
BOND MONEY
BOND MONEY
BOND MONEY
BOND MONEY
PAGE 2
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$19,217.28
$42,705.23
$61,922.51*
$378.00
$378.00
$2,344.00
$2,344.00
$16-20
$1.68
$17.88
$1 7-50
$17 .50
$2.62
$.27
$2.89
$10.80
$1.12
$11.92
$30.00
$30-00
$670.49
$670.49
.$275-00
$275.00
$800.00
$234.54
$14,458-78
$120.53
$99.87
$3,546.10
$61-94
$16,400.13
$35,721-89*
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$45.00
$30-00
$75.00*
$3j000-00
$3j000-00
$290.00
$290.00
$5,749.50
$5,749.50
$5.40
$.56
$5.96
$2r500-00
$2r500.00
$1,949.31
$1,949-31
$3,325.00
$2,125.00
$4r725.00
$1, 975.00
$12,150.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
� s
PAGE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION.
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE OF HARWOOD HEIGHTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT.PROSPECT
REIMB TICKET
W&S PMT BOSTON CHICKEN
$30.00
$384.42
$30.00*
$384.42*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO GENERAL FUND
ER TO EPA FLOOD LOAN B&J
$426.83
$45,400.00
TR TO RISE MGMT
$575.00
$46,401.83
CARLA WEBBER
RESIDENT RE ER TAX REBATE
COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM
$320.00
$2,500.00
$320.00
$2,500.00
MARK WWEBBER ICZ
WOMEN IN COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
INTERNSHIP INTERVIEW DAY
$20.00
$20.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$740,764.95
GENERAL FUND
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$544,241.49 REFUSE DISPOSAL
$3,722:55 1993E REFUNDNG
FUND
B&I — FLOOD 91A
$1,991.00
$45,400.00
WATER & SEWER FUND
$51,921:10 PARKING SYSTEM
REVENUE FUND
FUND
$1,960.39
$18,545.22
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$16,400.13 FLEXCOMP ESCROW
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$56,583.07
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
GEORGE CLOWES
CONFERENCE EXPENSES
$173.03
$50.00
$173.03
$50.00*
THE MISSION TO THE NAVAJOS
DONATION—HILL MEMORY
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
***TOTAL**
$223.03
GENERAL FUND
$223.03
VILLAGE MANAGER'S.OFFICE
JANAYaA. CASSAI
SUBPOENA FEE
$30:00
$30.00*
VENDOR
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
CRAIN'S CHICAGO BUSINESS
DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS
HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER
IGFOA
NORTHWEST, STATIONERS INC.
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE*DEPT.
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
ELIZABETH M. SITARZ
VON BRIESEN AND PUREELL, S.C.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUBSCRIPTION
$76.00
$75.00
COPIER MICE CONTRACT
$118.13
$118.1-3
PRE -EMP PHYSICAL-BRAUTIGAM
$147.00
$147.00
REGISTER -JEPSON
$150.00
$150.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$148.12
$148.12
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$62.70
COMM ASST ZBA MTG
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$8.00
MELANIE KRUPP
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$106.25
$25.00
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$191.25
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$85.00
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES.
$13.75
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$280.00
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$492.50
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$535.00
$1,774.45
MISC EXPENES
$38.95
MISC EXPENES
$4.00
$42.95*
INTEROFFICE MEMO PAPER
$144.00
$144.00
SUBPOENA FEE
$30.00
$30.00*
JUNE LEGAL FEES
$838.06
$838.06
***TOTAL**
$3,498.71
$3,498.71
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC.
FALL�WINTER MP NEWSLETTER
$380.00
$380.00
AMERITECH
SERV CE
$50.00
SERVICE
$2,022.73
$2,Q72.73
AT&T
019 098 4888 001
$445.83
$445.83
JOHN KEANE
COMM ASST ZBA MTG
$25.00
$25.00
MELANIE KRUPP
COMM ASST ZBA MTG
$25.00
$25.00
VENDOR
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
PHYLLIS MOLIERE
ERIC PACHNER
APRIL RAJCZYK
jpppv RAjr yx
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
COMM ASST ZB MTG
COMM ASST ZB MTG
COMM ASST VB MTG
COMM ASST VB MTG
OAMM"MTr&MTnMC DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
PAGE 5
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
$25-00
$25.00
$25.00
$25-00
$25.00
$25-00
$25.00
$25.00
***TOTAL**
$3,048.56
GENERAL FUND
$3l048.56
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BT PUBLIX
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$77-69
$35.80
$113.49
CONNECTRONIX CORPORATION
2 EMULATION CARDS
$339-00
$104.92
$339.00
$104.92
GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION
I.B.M. CORPORATION - BC5
BINDING MACHINE
AUG MICE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$198-00
$198.00
HERBERT LAUBENSTEIN
SERVICES
$25.00
$23.95
$25.00
$23-95
METRO EXPRESS, INC.
THE PERFECT IMAGE
DELIVERY
PHOTO SERVICES
$14.00
$14-00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENES
MISC EXPENES
$63.89
$10.84
$74.73*
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE VEHICLE LETTERS
$1,812.34
$1,812.34*
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECKS
Z% 0
$318.73
$4.79
$318.73
$4.79
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC.
PHOTO SERVICES
PURCHASE ORDERS
$472.00
PURCHASE ORDERS
$98.90
VEHICLE LICENSE APPS
$403.70
ENVELOPES
$173.50
ENVELOPES
$386.40
$1r534-50
TRACS
AUGUST CONNECT FEE
$50-00
$50-00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$4,613.45
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $4,613.45
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC. FALL/WINTER MP NEWSLETTER $5,315-65 $5r315-65
CHICAGO TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION $178-60 $178.60
STEVEN R. JENKINS CO., INC. NEWSLETTER EDITING $3,008.40 $3,008.40
NATIONWIDE PAPERS NEWSLETTER PAPER $202.61
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
NEWSLETTER PAPER
NEWSLETTER PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
$9,437.25
lJb. 71
$455.70 $795.02
$69-58 $69.58
$33.60
$36.40 _$70-00
***TOTAL** $9,437-25
BROOKFIELD
CODE REVIEW FEES
$29-08
MED CLAIMS THRU 8/9/94
$25,994.48
$26t023.56*
HELEN GIORDANO
REFUND PRESCRIPTION DIFF
$11.45
$11.45
HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER
SVCS—RICKER
$230.00
$230.00
KNIGHTIHOPPEFFANNING&KNIGHTILT
SERVICES RENDERED
$689-60
$689.60
RISK RESOURCES
RISK MGMT SERVICES
$500-00
$500-00
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
***TOTAL**
$27,454.61
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $27,454.61
INSPECTION SERVICES
ALLCOM, INC. SPEAKER PHONES $308.00
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ADVANCED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. SERVICE AGREEMENT $600.00 $600.00
AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $165.70
SPEAKER PHONES
$37(}.08
SPEAKER PHONES
$500.00
SPEAKER PHONES
$300.00
$1,478.08
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
SEWER BAITING
$260.00
PEST CONTROL SVCS
$60.00
$320.00
CONNECERONIX CORPORATION
2 EMULATION CARDS
$199.50
2 EMULATION CARDS
$199.50
$399.00
INT. ASSOC. OF ELECTRICAL
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$34.00
$34.00
KARA COMPANY INC
COPIER PAPER
$106.00
$106,00
NCSBCS
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$75.00
$75.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$42.00
$42.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENES
$10.83
MISC EXPENES
$20.00
MISC EXPENES
$17.84
$4$.67*
FRED PRYOR SEMINARS
REGISTER-VEMMER
$79.00
$79.00
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
SUBSCRIPTION
$15.00
$15.00
WHEELING REPROD
COPIER PAPER
$99.36
$99.36
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$2,696.11
GENERAL FUND
$2,696.11
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ADVANCED SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. SERVICE AGREEMENT $600.00 $600.00
AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $165.70
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION-
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PARTS
$31.02
MTCE SUPPLIES
$9.78
PARTS
$267.12
PARTS
$54-84
$528.46
AMERITECH
SERVICE
$23.78
SERVICE
$500.00
SERVICE
$100.00
SERVICE
$9.18
$632.96
AMOCO OIL.COMPANY
GASOLINE
$16.34
$16-34
BARKER & HERBERT ANALYTICAL
TUITION-GIBSON/RZEPECKI
$660-00
$660-00
CARQUEST OF MT. PROSPECT
PARTS
$51.60
$51-60
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
$196.40
$196.40
HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC.
1 CROSS-OVER PIPE
$51.75
$51.75
ILLINOIS ASSOC. OF TECHNICAL
REGISTER-DAHLBERG
$100.00
$100-00
INFOSOURCE, INC.
SEMINAR ON A DISK
$155-45
$155.45
INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON
FILTERS
$61.87
$61-87
KALE UNIFORMS, INC,
RAINCOAT -WILSON
$97.35
$97-35
LATTO-F CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$25.00
PARTS
$107.18
PARTS
$13.04
PARTS
$48.90
PARTS
$11.81
PARTS
$214.76
PARTS
$39-16
PARTS
$68.10
$527-95
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$10.55
PARTS
$12.40
PARTS
$15.95
PARTS
$29.98
PARTS
315.95
$84.83
NORTHWEST CARDIAC REHAB CENTER
3 STRESS TESTS
$ 60.00
3 STRESS TESTS
$180-00
$540.00
NOVA CELLULAR
SERVICE
$556-31
$556.31
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
JUNE 1994 STRAYS
$281-00
$281.00
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$24.80
$24.80
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
COMPLAINT RECEIPTS
$59.20
$59.20
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SAMPLING CORPORATION OF AMER.
HALLOWEEN BAGS
$205.00
$205.00
SAVE -A -PET
JUNE 1994 STRAYS
$105.00
$105-00
JEFFREY SCHMITZ
EXPENSES
$119.90
$119-90
SNAP HAPPY
TUITION-SULLIVANT
$295.00
$295-00
SUBURBAN TRIM & GLASS CO.
REBUILD DRIVERS SEAT
$78-50
$78.50
TOTAL AUTO PARTS INC.
PARTS
$123.76
PARTS
$33-36
$157.12
UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY
PARTS
$25.22
$25.22
WHOLESALE TO THE INSTALLER
SUPPLIES
$170.00
SUPPLIES
$21-65
SUPPLIES
$86.60
$278.25
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
RADIATOR
$159-90
$159.90
XL MARKETING GROUP, INC.
2 PT NCR MTCE FORMS
$96.00
$96.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$6,746.16
GENERAL FUND
$6,746.16
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ABBOT OFFICE SYSTEMS
2 WALL UNITS
$115.84
$115.84
AMERITECH
SERVICE
$600-00
SERVICE
$9.18
SERVICE
$20.14
SERVICE
$63.20
$692.52
EDWARD CAVELLO
EXPENSES
$596-00
$596-00
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
070 0241696 2
$57.12
$57.12
JOHN DOLAN
EXPENSES
$118.00
$118-00
MARK FEDOR
EXPENSES
$118.00
$118-00
DEAN JAMROZEK
EXPENSES
$118-00
$118.00
KENNETH LABBE
EXPENSES
$118.00
$118.00
MICHAEL MANGIAMELE
EXPENSES
$118.00
$118-00
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
MOBILEMEDIA
MOTOROLA, INC.
BASIL NIKIFORAK
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SECRETARY OF STATE
SCOTT SLAASTED
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SERVICE
PARTS
EXPENSES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TRUCK TITLE
EXPENSES
$3,110.35
�len ,_y
$685.54
$50.41
$118.00
$73.92
$13.00
$118.04
***TOTAL**
PAGE 10
$685.54
$50.41
$118.00
$73.92
$13.00
$118.00
$31110.35
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS JULY SVCS RENDERED $1,053.76 $1,053.76
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES ***TOTAL** $1,053.76
GENERAL FUND
HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT
$1,053.76
AMERITECH
SERVICE
$450.00
$450.00
COLEEN ANDA
JULY
DRIVERS
REIMB
$3.00
$3.00
LEONARD W. BAZAN
JULY
DRIVERS
REIMB
REIMB
$15.00
$3.00
$15.00
$3.00
DON GRAD
DONALD HOEG
JULY
JULY
DRIVERS
DRIVERS
REIMB
$12.40
$12.00
LAUREY KARPINSKI
JULY
DRIVERS
REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
RAY LUNDIN
JULY
DRIFTERS
REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
VENDOR
HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
OTTO C. SCHERR, JR.
JEANNE SHERMAN
BERTHA STEIL
FRED WALTERS
KATHI WESLEY
ESTHER WITTE
RUTH WITTENBURG
LEE AND DICK YOUNG
HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC EXPENES
MISC EXPENES
JULY DRIVERS REIMB
JULY DRIVERS REIMB
JULY DRIVERS REIMB
JULY DRIVERS REIMB
JULY DRIVERS REIMB
JULY DRIVERS REIMB
JULY DRIVERS REIMB
JULY DRIVERS REIMB
$742.33
PAGE 11
INVOICE -AMOUNT TOTAL
$47. 38
$47.38
$8.00
$5,976.50
$101.95
$109.95*
$9.00
$9.00
$12.00
$12.00
$15.00
$15.00
$3.00=
$3.00
$12.00
$12.00
$12.00
$12.00
$15.00
$15.00
$6.00
$6.00
***TOTAL** $742.33
A.D.N. CONSTRUCTION
CDBG-403 S.WILLE
$5,976.50
$5,976.50
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
DIGEST FEE & SUBSCRIPTION
$265.00
$71.95
$265.00
$71.95
AMERICAN SPEEDY PRINTING CENT.
ARCHITECTURAL DIGEST
PRINTING & BINDERY
SUBSCRIPTION
$39.95
$39.95
B & H INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$44.75
$44.75
CRAIN'S CHICAGO BUSINESS
D & J CUSTOM CARPENTRY LTD.
1 YR SUBSCRIPTION
CDBG-507 S PINE
$76.00
$5,210.00
$76.00
$5,210.00
DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS
COPIER MICE CONTRACT
$118.12
$9.00
$118.12
$9.00
GOVERNING
MICHAEL J. MORAN
SUBSCRIPTION
CDBG-505 N FAIRVIEW
$180.00
$180.00
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER
LUNCHEON-FRITZ & EBBINGHAUS
$30.00
$30.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$59.64
$59.64
OSMONDSON ROOFING COMPANY
CDBG-316 S.EDWARD
$2,940.00
$2,940.00
OWEN ELECTRIC COMPANY
CDBG-403 S WILLS
$11575.00
$1,575.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENES
$37.00
MISC EXPENES
$11.87
MISC EXPENES
$44.71
$93.5$*
POSTMASTER
PLANNING SURVEY POSTAGE
$100.00
$100.00*
REI TITLE SERVICES
CDBG-104 N ELMHURST
$75.00
$75.00
ZONING BULLETIN
PUBLICATION
$79.81
$79.81
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$16,944.30
GENERAL FUND
$841.14 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$15,955.50
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$146.66
STREET DIVISION
JOSEPH ACCOMANDO
S C SIDEWALK
$84.00
$84.00
AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC.
S PPLIES
$189.89
1
SUPPLIES
$229.48
$419.37
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$59.73
PARTS
$36.00
$95.73
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
MATERIALS
$999.72
MATERIALS
$999.72
$1,999.44
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$298.30
$298.30
AMERITECH
SERVICE
$500.00
$500.00
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
AUGUST MTCE
$147.00
$147.00
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
KEYS & TAGS
$39.00
KEYS
$12.00
$51.00
ANTIOCH TIRE, INC.
TIRE MTCE
$23.00
TIRE MTCE
$47.00
$70.00
ATLAS BOBCAT INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$14.81
$14.81
BILL'S LAWN & POWER
GASKETS
$9.04
$9.04
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
SERVICES RENDERED
$40.00
$40.00
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
MTCE SUPPLIES
$416.83
$416.83
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
CARQUEST OF MT. PROSPECT
CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CINTAS CORP
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS,IN
CRONATRON WELDING SYSTEMS, INC
DIALAMERICA MARKETING, INC.
DOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY
DREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS, IN
EDAPHIC PRESS
THE FILE MART
FINISHMASTER, INC.
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON
INTERNATIONAL AIR FILTER
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
J & L INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.
KAR PRODUCTS INC
KING BEARINGS
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL- REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SERVICES
WATER USAGE
SERVICE
MTCE AGREEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
REPAIRS
MICE SUPPLIES
MICE AGREEMENT
SUPPLIES
PUBLICATION
1-8 TIER FILING SHELF
SUPPLIES
REPLACED COMPRESSOR
FILTERS
PARTS
PARTS
FILTERS
2 BATTERIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
TRAILER CABLE
DISPOSABLE GLOVES
MICE SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
$41.40
$71. fit
$100.05
$129.87 .8 7
$79.25
$7,345.61
$331.80
$292.73
$29.28
$29.90
$119.64
$64.80
$100.00
$134.38
$16.45
$401.00
$121.66
$961.00
$91.83
$31.29
$14.47
$257.18
$135.90
$20.84
$1.80
$174.64
$216.50
$8.71
$11.74
$11.94
$3.99
$9.04
$1.43
$5.72
$31.79
$.35 -
PAGE 13
TOTAL
$41.40
$71.62
$100.05
$129.87
$7.9.25
$7,345.61 (('��
$331.80
$322.01
$29.90
$119.64
$64.80
$100.00
$134.38
$16.45
$401.00
$121.66
$961.00
$137.59
$257.18
$135.90
$22.64
$391.14
$8.71
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
LEE AUTO PARTS
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
MATCO TOOLS
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
MUNICIPAL ARBORSTS AND URBAN
NAPCO STEEL INCORPORATED
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
ERIC E. PIEE
PINNER ELECTRIC
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS-
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
CREDIT
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
MICE SUPPLIES
MICE SUPPLIES
MECE SUPPLIES
MECE SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP DUES-S.CLARK
STEEL & ALUMINUM
STEEL & ALUMINUM
ENTHALPY CONTROL & LABOR
1830 E KENSINGTON
PARTS
CREDIT
PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CATALOG ENVELOPES
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
6 FUSE BOXES
MICE 17 TRAFFIC SIGNALS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MICE
PARTS
INVOICE AMOUNT
$25.80
$448.95
$52.90
$38.06
$13.40
$13.40
$53.60
$56.24
$54.27
$108.55
$176.23
$176.23-
$47.60
$19.79
$60.30
$439.45
$84.07
$28.88
$86.60
$15.00
$1,565.75
$179.20
$452.52
$76.58
$629.39
$343.75-
$5.75
$7.92
$11.98
$55.76
$4.34
$36.34
$54.00
$9,764.09
$1,581.07
$118.70
PAGE 14
•
$720.61
$219.06
$127.69
$439.95
$199.55
$15.00
$1,744.95
$452.52
$76.58
$291.39
$7.92
$11.98
*
$96.44*
$54.00
$11,345-16
$118.70
'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
PROFESSIONAL FINISH
MICE SUPPLIES
$54-80
$54.80
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$106.50
PARTS
$33.83
PARTS
$24.80
PARTS
$6.63
$171.76
RHINO LINNINGS, OF DUPAGE
MICE SUPPLIES
150.00
8615-75
$150.00
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SERVICE OF PARTS CLEANERS
$615.75
SAM'S GLASS & TRIM, INC
RESEAL WINDSHIELD GLASS
$45-00
$45-00
SAUBER MFG. CO.
ALUMINUM.WALL CABINET
$330.60
MICE SUPPLIES
$165.05
TOOL BOX
$1,170.00
$1,665.65
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
PARTS
$147.49
PARTS
$68.41
$215-90
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
PART
$47.49
SUPPLIES
$15-81
SUPPLIES
$22.17
1 FURNACE COIL
$43.30
$128.77
SUBURBAN CONCRETE, INC.
S4C SIDEWALK PROGRAM
$23,550.83
$23,550-83
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
M CE SUPPLIES
$55.49
MICE SUPPLIES
$367.52
$423.01
TOTAL AUTO PARTS INC.
PARTS'
$38-08
PARTS
$73.38
$111.46
UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY
PARTS
$51.75
$51.75
VERMEER-ILLINOIS
PARTS
$557.89
PARTS
$51.86
$609.75
WEARGUARD
PW UNIFORM SHIRTS
$859.82
$859.82
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
PARTS
$36.51
$36-51
WHOLESALE TO THE INSTALLER
SUPPLIES
$170-00
SUPPLIES
$16-98
SUPPLIES
$13.38
$200-36
XL MARKETING GROUP, INC.
2 PT NCR MICE FORMS
$96.00
2 PT NCR MTCE FORMS
$32-00
$128-00
STREET DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$60,409.74
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11%94
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $49,064.58 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $11,345.16
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC.
AEENA TRUCK PARTS
ALPHAGRAPHICS #335
AMERITECH
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BLS ENTERPRISES, INC.
CARQUEST OF MT. PROSPECT
CATCHING FLUIDPOWER
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
CINTAS CORP
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMP USA
COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS,IN
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK
CRONATRON WELDING SYSTEMS, INC
4
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FINISHMA.STER, INC.
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
REPLACED HEAT DETECTOR
MICE SUPPLIES
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
GASOLINE
MTCE & CALIBRATION CONTROLS
REPAIR HYDRAULIC CYLINDER
CREDIT
PARTS
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
UNIFORM SERVICES
BD75-JT-2744-D
SOFTWARE
SOFTWARE UPGRADES
MTCE AGREEMENT
OPER. MAINT.COSTS-JAWA
VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA
POWER COSTS-JAWA
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
DELIVERIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
RECHG EXTINGUISHER
$90.00 $90.00
$26.35
$119.58 $145.93
$761.81 $761.81
$31.21
18
$.25
$300.00
$104.04
$16.48
$987.60
$443.00
$35.40-
$76.80
$29.71
$33.15
$129.87
$199.38
$278.41
$96.94
$331.80
$13,753.00
$99,564.00
$12,334.00
$158,365.00
$292.72
$29.29
$359.25
$21.88
$27 92
$1600
$453.50
$16.48
$98760
$443.00
$41.40
$29.71
$33.15
$129.87
$199.387
$375.35
$331.80
$284,016.00
$322.01
$359.25
$49.80
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
RECHARGE EXTINGUISHER
$16.00
RECHARGE EXTINGUISHER
$16.00
RECHG EXTINGUISHER
$16.00
RECHG EXTINGUISHER
$16-00
RECHG EXTINGUISHER
$16.00
$96.00
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
2 TIRES BALANCED
319.00
319.00
GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SER
2 TIRES
$83.80
$ 83-80
I.B.M. CORPORATION - BC5
AUG MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$198.00
$198.00
INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON
FILTERS
$49.55
PARTS
$33.71
PARTS
$14.46
PARTS
$12.24
PARTS
$12.60
$122-56
KAR PRODUCTS INC
TRAILER CABLE
$174-64
$174.64
KIEFT BROTHERS INC,
MTCE SUPPLIES
$236.00
$236-00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$13-60
PARTS
$9.14
PARTS
$20.27
PARTS
$56.00
PARTS
$26.80
$125-81
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$9.86
PARTS
$12.25
$22.11
MEYER MATERIAL CO
TORPEDO SAND
$54.29
$54.29
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.P
MTCE SUPPLIES
$163.92
$163.92
MAPCO STEEL INCORPORATED
STEEL & ALUMINUM
$179.20
$179.20
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL -FILM L
SAFETY FILM
$85-00
$85.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1818 1/2 BONITA
$40.47
$40.47
ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
MTCE AGREEMENT
$1r150-00
$1,150-00
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$22.40
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
$42.40
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$25.07
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$40.00
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$28-95
$94.02*
ERIC E. PIEE
6 FUSE BOXES
$54.00
$54.00
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$184.42
CREDIT
$51.10-
$133.32
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION,
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$526.53
$526.53*
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
$24.80
PARTS
$18.14
$18-14
$42.94
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
FILM & PROCESSING
$15-35
$15.35
SAUBER MFG. CO.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$165.04
$165-04
SPARLING INSTUMENTS CO INC
MTCE SUPPLIES
$37.00
$37.00
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$104.63
MTCE SUPPLIES
$208.50
$313.13
TECH SYN.CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$489.64
$489-64
TOTAL AUTO PARTS INC*
PARTS
$38.08
$38.08
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
RESET MONITOR
$98-00
REPAIR 3 PAGERS
$132.00
$230.00
MICHAEL WAGNER & SONS, INC.
1 SUMP PUMP SWITCH
$54.35
$54.35
WATER PRO SUPPLIES INC.
FIRE HYDRANT
$828-60
VALVES
$3,819.95
$4,648.75
WEARGUARD
PW UNIFORM SHIRTS
$859.82
$859.82
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
PARTS
$28.03
PARTS
$212.03
PARTS
$26.63
$266.69
WHOLESALE TO THE INSTALLER
SUPPLIES
$170.00
SUPPLIES
$12.47
$182-47
WINFIELD ENGINEERS, INC.
SVCS RENDERED
$5,131.38
$5,131.38
XL MARKETING GROUP, INC.
2 PT NCR MTCE FORMS
$9,6.00
$96-00
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$305,257.75
WATER & SEWER FUND
$305,257.75
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
FINISHMASTER, INC.
JUNE94 PAINT SUPPLIES
$411-14
$411.14
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$411-14
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$411.14
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
TIPPING FEES
$79,000.00
$79,000..00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$79,000.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$19,000.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
RESURFACING
$269,874.15
$269,874.15
BURKE AND RYAN
SERVICES RENDERED
$7,501.90
$7,501.90
DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS
1 TOSHIBA COPIER
$7,736.00
$7,736.00
ELEK-TEK, INC.
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$1,141.93
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$319.00
$1,460.93
NAPCO STEEL INCORPORATED
MATERIALS
$75.95
MATERIALS
$75.95
STEEL & ALUMINUM
$288.63
STEEL & ALUMINUM
$288.63
$729.16
JOHN NERI CONSTRUCTION CO.INC.
STORM SEWER IMPORVEMENE
$315,198.00
$315,198.00
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$654.75
$654.75
SAUBER MFG. CO.
MICE SUPPLIES
$284.55
MICE SUPPLIES
$284.55
$569.10
STANLEY CONSULTANTS
SERVICES RENDERED
$17,528.13
$17,628.13
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
***TOTAL**
$621,352.12
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/11/94
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $269,874.15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $16,698.83
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST FUND $654.75 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND $332,826.13
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $1,298.26
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
EDWARD HINES LUMPIER CO. LUMBER $26.66 $26.66
L -NOR CLEANERS 6 FLAGS CLEANED $21.00 $21.00
SODA STRIP SYSTEMS INC. REMOVE GRAFFITI $571.00 $571.00
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $618.66
GENERAL FUND ' $618.56
********************************************************************************************************
PENSIONS
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
WITHHOLDING TAXES
$200.00
$200.00
CHARLES W. NICK
AUGUST 94 PENSION
$1,254.25
$1,254.25
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SEPT MEDICAL INSURANCE
$346.00
$346.00
RICHARD M. VINCENZO
AUGUST 94 PENSION
$231.78
$231.78
PAUL H. WATKINS
AUGUST DISABILITY BENEFIT
$1,620.83
$1,620.83
PENSIONS
***TOTAL**
$3,652.86
GENERAL FUND $1,486.03 BENEFIT TRUST #2
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
$2,166.83
$1,8911035.84
DATE RUN 8/13./94
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21
TIME RUN 11-57.42
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 8/11/94
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$631,421.61
11
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
12
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$180fggl.00
81r219.31
13
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$19r679.05
40
1993B REFUNDNG B&I - FLOOD 91A
$45,400.00
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$16,845.49
55
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST FUND
$654.75
59
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
332,826.13
61
WATER & SEWER FUND
8357r178.85
63
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$2,371.53
67
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$1,298.26
69
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$43,854.74
73
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$18,545.22
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$56,583.07
77
BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,891,035-84
VULIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCIAL REPORT
July 1, 1494 - July 31, 1994
2� 7 $5,373,217
Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
Fund
Balance
for
for
Balance
LWY V4
A
n R v=tfjnAs
General Fund
$290469547
$l,060,543
$19,4943,214
$ 1,612, 876
Refuse Disposal Fund
(105t286)
691,134
319,634
(355,806)
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
399,523
1082705
2901,797
217,431
Community Development Block Grant Fund
12,558
271,041
141,189
259460
Ent cerise Fins
Water & Sewer Fund
2,412, I38
500,584
506,568
204061,154
Parking System Revenue Fund
3591,583
169104
49535
3711152
IMmidice Funds
Risk Management Fund
11,4159077
2489373
118,671
1,544,77}
Vehicle Replacement Fund
1,5341140
21190
520,250
11016,080
spit Pry
Capital Improvement Fund
(18t263)
2,674,442
2,656,179
Downtown Redev. Const. Funds
606,201
2,601
55,454
553,348
Police & Fire Building Construction
1479136
724
W
147,860
Flood Control Const. Fund
1,881,669
59110
374,391
1,5121388
EPA Flood Loan Construction
(534,293)
2003,486
709212
{404,019}
Street Imprv. Const. Fund
49992,863
189581
51011,444
Debt Service Funds
294799121
1089928
484
225871,565
T F_
Flexcomp Trust
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
20,159,446
170,923
771,572
2092521,797
Firemen's Pension Fund
239,207,501
157,280
751,994
239288,787
Benefit Trust Funds
225.077-_224-328
2� 7 $5,373,217
V I L L A G E O F
M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E
V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/94 - 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
T--
V
A
TAX REVENUE
13,139,600.00
650,712.42
919,150.77
12,220,449.23
93.00
LICENSES, PERMITS i FEES
2,204,000.00
74,438.10
1,308,249.29
895,750.71
40.64
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
3,013,600,00
278,419.94
553,276.50
2,460,323.50
81.64
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
416,000.00
3,330.00
13,450.00
402,550.00
96.76
FINES AND FORFEITS
319,000.00
28,886.56
66,209.34
252,790.66
79.24
OTHER REVENUE
1 11
24 755,99
122 555.84
1 036 744.16
89.42
FUND TOTALS
20 251 500.00
1,0 _3
298g,�91- 74,
17,268,608.Z6L
85.27 X
RE .U$ ISPOSAL FUND
TAX REVENUE
2,071,500.00
12,311,22
22,300.02
2,049,199.98
98.92
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
629,600.00
56,690,05
198,252.31
431,347.69
68.51
OTHER REVENUE
5,
95
�1 g23. g2
11.906.91�,
78.13
FUND TOTALS?,
0 �.� 1C 1 .0�!
69,134.21
221 1,, §45.42,
2 484 454.58
91.80 X
IM FU-1FU-lk6 TAX F
INTMOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
11170,000.00
108,115.36
216,601.10
953,398,90
81.48
OTHER REVENUE
3 000.00
5L9,,99
3,459.49
33,540,51----
90.65
FUND TOTALS
ZQZA-.1015.
705.35_-_.��0
59
*986,939.41
'81.76 X
g2M!,TY EV MT GRANT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
313,605.00
18,000.00
40,000.00
273,605.00
87.24
OTHER REVENUE
50,000.00
9091,1
17 492.95
32.507.05
65.01
FUND TOTALS
363 605.00
27 091.15
57 492.95
306 112.05
84.18 X
T.1 P RPO!SES B S 177
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
1,500.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
.00
.00
OTHER REVENUE
w.... L"000.00
143.05
984.51
4 015.49
80.30
FUND TOTALS
695W. w
19643.05
2 9 484.51
49015.49_
61.77 X
eUWmjg MS FAgILTY 891 19878
TAX REVENUE 295,150.00 1,771.82 3,209.41 291,940.59 98.91
OTHER REVENUE 12g000-00 .1 LOU. w 2,927.52 91072.0 75.60
FUND TOTALS?1301 150. gO agog.54 1 N1.4 91 98.00 %
101000 1 m M.
POLIgg_& FIRE P!IcffiB S 1991A
TAX REVENUE 271,750.00 1,489.80 2,698.55 269,051.45 99.00
OTHER REVENUE 7.500.00., J 427-9 1 a 921. L7 L 0,4 82.77
FUND TOTALS 279,250.00 19947.7Q 3,990-42 75 X59.8 98.57 %
12439 BIFMMM Ul - $71, 1 91A
TAX REVENUE 246,250.00 1,398.36 2,532.92 243,717.08 98.97
OTHER REVENUE 14250.00 306.92 14037.7g 212.30 16.98
FUND TOTALS 247-1500.00, 14705.28 g43 4 �929 98.55 %
V I L L A G E 0 F
H 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E
V E N U E" S U
H K A R Y
5/01/94
- 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR No
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
CAPITAL IMPROVNENT 8 9 11992A
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
FUND TOTALS
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00 %
j 994A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
160,000.00
.00
.00
160,000.00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
350.00
7.1
. ......... ..
191-09
92.31
FUND TOTALS
1609350.00
7.13
160,323.09
99.98 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 1 1974
TAX REVENUE
171,700.00
828.46
1,500.63
170,199.37
99.12
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
5,200.00
5,200.00
5,200.00
.00
W
OTHER REVENUE
-6.L000. W
338.94
1.129. 59
4 -WO. 41
81.17
FUND TOTALS
182.9,00.,00
6367.40 .
4
17,830-22 . .....
175.,069. 78
95.71 %
eUWmjg MS FAgILTY 891 19878
TAX REVENUE 295,150.00 1,771.82 3,209.41 291,940.59 98.91
OTHER REVENUE 12g000-00 .1 LOU. w 2,927.52 91072.0 75.60
FUND TOTALS?1301 150. gO agog.54 1 N1.4 91 98.00 %
101000 1 m M.
POLIgg_& FIRE P!IcffiB S 1991A
TAX REVENUE 271,750.00 1,489.80 2,698.55 269,051.45 99.00
OTHER REVENUE 7.500.00., J 427-9 1 a 921. L7 L 0,4 82.77
FUND TOTALS 279,250.00 19947.7Q 3,990-42 75 X59.8 98.57 %
12439 BIFMMM Ul - $71, 1 91A
TAX REVENUE 246,250.00 1,398.36 2,532.92 243,717.08 98.97
OTHER REVENUE 14250.00 306.92 14037.7g 212.30 16.98
FUND TOTALS 247-1500.00, 14705.28 g43 4 �929 98.55 %
/j
V I L LII G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D 6 E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/94 - 7/31/94
BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
RJMLHT 1 19RC NT19R
TAX REVENUE 801000.00 .00 .00 80,000.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE4.000.x, a 4. 3.S4b.3 88.65
FUND TOTALS 4.00 b0.4Q 453.68_, 83:�54b.2 99.45 X
NTOWN R FIT 0 8 1987D
TAI( REVENUE 70,000.00 rW 422.75 69,577.25 99.39
OTHER REVENUE �0', gm 1,00 .. 39,26 , 1, $114 73 _. j 446. ? 74.10
Fly TOTALS .� , 1.97.44 a MIX 97.39 X
,ROWMN T @ I 1 1991
TAX REVENUE 20,000.00 .00 .00 20,000.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 15M.9L 323.83 826.10 1.673.90 66.95
FUND TOTALS 22.500.00 323.83. ........ ..... J&0 21,671-2q 96.32 X
ROKM REMIZMT 0 A199
TAX REVENUE 50,000.00 .00 .00 50,000.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 2.500 00 250.82 �bIN 836_35 73.45
FtW TOTALS 52.500 . Q0 50. . 51.836.35__ 98.73 X
DOWT MT E 99 A
TAX REVENUE 200,000.00 .00 .00 200,000.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 5,0m.I_ 322.Mi 1 01 3.903.82 7$.07
FUND TOTALS! 5000.00. 32 1,6M.18 „-, -903-82 99.46 X
..
RW"M afaKYLPMT ,I A I 1
TAX REVENUE 100,000.00 .00 .00 100,000.00 100.00
IPA FLOOD LOAN 8 & I FUND
TAX REVENUE 400,000.00 .00 .00 400,000-00 100.00
V I L L A G E 0 F
M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U
M M A R Y
5/01/94
- 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR No
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 0 si 1 19948
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE
.6g
1.88
498.12
99.62
FUND TOTALS
1.51x} - C
IA
199 A", 19-
%
F', 6.00D r
MJROL_§& I 1"JA . ......
TAX REVENUE
25,000.00
.00
109.86
24,890.14
99.56
OTHER REVENUE
12 t"90 4 m
1.220.60
39346.77
19653.g3
72.11
FUND TOTALS
37,000.00
....... 11-92-0. W-.
31456.63
339543.37
90.65 %
FLM, goTM.-Q 811
TAX REVENUE
300,000.00
.00
.00
300,000.00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
19,000.0-0
11,148.05A321.26
...
89678.71
72-32
FUND TOTALS
119,4900 00
19148,05
308g678.74
98.93 %
122H REFUINKM UI - FLOOD 91A
TAX REVENUE
200,000.00
83,367.44
83,367.44
116,632.56
58.31
OTHER REVENUE
mm -1.
157"Z"al
157.31
b? t,69 "
68.53
FUND TOTALS
200500.0083g2g4J5
83.45g4.75
11649-7,5.2,5,1
58.34 %
.F6MCONTROL .,,..B & 11994A
TAX REVENUE
200,000.00
.00
.00
200,000-00
100.00
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
48,500.00
.00
.00
48,500-00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
19000.00
3.10
9.38
990.62
99.06
FUND TOTALS
249,500.00
3.10
9.38
249,490.62
99.99 %
IPA FLOOD LOAN 8 & I FUND
TAX REVENUE 400,000.00 .00 .00 400,000-00 100.00
V I L L A G E O F
M O U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E
V E N U E` S U
M M A R Y
5/01/94
- 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR MO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
EPA FLOOD LOAN B i I FUND
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
.-- BALANCE
BALANCE
OTHER REVENUElm'.00
�. �.,..
1,?Q6.94
1 Q
1.Q..,.?.fit, ,.9T
78.87
FUND TOTALS
4251Q00.00
1,706.94
,29503
419 704.97
98.75 X
ash 7
TAX REVENUE
11,100.00
89.28
240.58
10,859.42
97.83
OTHER REVENUE
1.
8.
?15.14
?1.51
FUND TOTALS
�1.9 a] 99 - 99
147.58
.525.4„4
11.574.5
95.65 X
S
TAX REVENUE
2,600.00
.00
3.71
2,596.29
99.85
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
4,800.00
4,800.00
4,800.00
.00
.00
OTHER REVENUE
595.00-3
2!9.59
?
5$.05
FUND TOTALS
99 .00
4 8l98�43_,
..
2,941.70
36.79 X
figgWLVALBERTBg
TAX REVENUE
36,400.00
247.34
462.05
35,937.95
`98.73
OTHER REVENUE
„500
57.86
195.75
304.25
60.85
FUND TOTALS
3015.20
657.80
aiz, 20
98.21 X
CAPITAL IMPROV M NT F
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
72,500.00
39,955.01
76,894.90
4,394.90-
6.06 -
OTHER REVENUE
,RM.�'.
.4.487, 45
562-05
.. . ` 6 29,05
996.24-
FUND TOTALS
373,100Clt3�
2 674 442.46
2 714 456.95
2,401 356.95-
766.96-X
POLICE,FI B T FUND
OTHER REVENUE
7.24.00
2.029.E
1 029.86-
102.98 -
FUND TOTALS
1_� OOC! , C1D
724.00
_.LM, 86
16092.86-
102.9$-%
V I L L A G E O F
M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E
V E N U E S U
M M A R Y
5/01/94 - 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR MO
Y-T-D
BUDGET
PERCENT
T PMS T F
U"
OTHER REVENUE
3'S 0'��.00
����
2..600.94
7 4, 60,38
1 27 391 .62
78.26
FUND TOTALS
ALMA
2 g §24 ,
7 .�8
�„ .&7 jr91,N
78.26 X
§T.R C
e.QhLT,..F02
OTHER REVENUE
33 L 52
11,511-32
5,
.
53.01
FUND TOTALS
117J-9100 100
18 581.19
55,203.94
53.01 X
PA FM LQAN MST FUND
OTHER REVENUE
1sJ10,615.00
200.4&5.00
'� " ,
2110 1 L9.00
85.78
FUND TOTALS
1XI9,61' 5 - m-1
200 486.00 _
=4 486�. 00
T 2104 129.00
85.78 X
FLOOD.,CONTROL CONST FUND
OTHER REVENUE
00
51,109.71 5 109.71
164881.25
134118-15
43.72
FUND TOTALS
,90.
5 g 109.71
16.881.85
13 118.15
43.72 X
WAT R i SEY R FUND
TAX REVENUE
1,432,500.00
8,510.84
8,819.14
1,423,680.86
99.38
LICENSES, PERMITS E FEES
17,500.00
.00
1,005.00
16,495.00
94.25
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
4,738,500.00
484.,509.78
1,288,418.26
3,450,081.74
72.80
OTHER REVENUE
175 000.00
7,..563.3.1........,
24.395.43
1 , `_�. 5?
86.05
FUND TOTALS
A ml , 5_00 0
9,41,9 1,91
1,322,637.93
S .040.862.1 T
79.21 X
EAWINJ Y T M REVISE F
LICENSES, PERMITS i FEES
2,880.00
240.00
960.00
1,920.00
66.66
FINES AND FORFEITS
179,000.00
14,993.77
45,698.52
133,301.48
74.47
OTHER REVENUE
10,120.00_
870.06
29999.08
Z,I
70.36
FUND TOTALS
1921000.00- _,
16 103.83
49
1 +"+'42 4Q_
74.13,%
V I L L A G E O F
M 0 U N T P RCI S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E
V E N U E S U
M M A R Y
5/01/94 - 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
794,1010.00
.00
794,100.00
.00
.00
OTHER REVENUE
��
2 189.90
+ 585.42
126,414;.18
95.04
FUND TOTALS
9,27 j 00.00
94189.9c)
M,685;42
126,414.58
13.63 %
jllsx-,M�m-w FM
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
2,196,500.00
217,740.06
441,252.07
1,755,247.93
79.91
OTHER REVENUES
50. ,�
30.632.66
92.766 .
3, 7 01, .
78.41
FUND TOTALS
_2,626.350.00
X48.372.72
34 X018.1991929,4131291
79.66 X
w TAX REVENUE
205,000.00
1,013.88
1,052.09
203,947.91
99.48
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
17,500.00
14,000.00
14,0100.00
31500.00
20.00
OTHER REVENUE
11552 500.0
1 M2.,51
420,9569.04
1 231 930.96
74.54
FUND TOTALS
3 a X00!0
?Q42_2 : ;22
3 &?, A3
14014M.87
76.76 %
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
TAX REVENUE
254,000.00
1,303.56
1,352.68
254,647.32
99.47
INTER60VERNMENTAL REVENUE
22,500.00
14,?72.84
14,772.84
7,727.16
34.34
OTHER REVENUE
1 918 850.00
„4511.
141 203.71
780.78_
X467 6,W9. -'9
76.45
FUND TOTALS
2,122 50, t
%
46
I .,M,443 , 70
78.70 %
BENEFIT TRUST #2
OTHER REVENUE
1545010.00
1 417,56
4 253.93
11,246.07
72.55
FUND TOTALS
15
1.4.17.5
4 X53. 5
11,246,07,
72.55 X
V I L L A G E D F
M O U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E
V E N U E S U
M M A R Y
5/01/94 - 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
Y F
T
C VED
RECEIVED
NCE
NC`
OTHER REVENUE
3 " 00
.00
.00
3.206,000.00
100.00
FUND TOTALS
3..M.000.00_
;
CQ
3.206.000.00
100.00 %
TOTALS ALL FUNDS
46,843,365.00
5,373,217.84
10,224,439.25
36,618,925.75
78.17 %
LESS TRANSFERS
� 208,500.99-
.00
.00
50�„0.00-
100.00 %„�
TOTAL REVENUES
46�634,,886„5.00
5,373,217 JA,
1a.224,439.25
36.410,425.75
78.07 %
V I L L A G E O F
M 0 U N T P
R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E
N D I T U R E
S'U M M A R Y
5/01/94 - 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y-T-D
BUDGET
PERCENT
GENERAL FUND_
_ AMOUNT
EXPENDED
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
PERSONAL SERVICES
14,099,380.00
1,103,879.92
3,044,511.45
11,054,868.55
78.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,491,650.00
288,658.23
1,474,245.71
3,017,404.29
67.17
COMMODITIES
780,160.00
65,897.19
133,434.01
646,725.99
82.89
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
528,2901.00
34,292.13
38,077.38
490,212.62
92.79
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
50,000.00
.00
.00
50,000.00
100.00
PENSION EXPENSE
49 .010
1,AW03
4 45
, 4;�'",►. 41.91
90.90
FUND TOTALS
19.998.4$0.00
1 494 213 50
4, (A�
15.303 , 753.36
76.52 X
RgfM,,,,,DI§POSAL FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES
63,095.00
4,313.32
12,893.99
50,201.01
79.56
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,419,100.00
312,563.22
554,420.88
1,864,679.12
77.08
COMMODITIES
1.5 000.
2.77;§
2 82,1.94
2� 17, Iii__•
81.18
FUND TOTALS
.294974195.00
319&2k;,§0
570 136.81
1,927.058.19
77.16 X
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
121,500.00
8,209.00
13,593.16
107,906.84
88.81
COMMODITIES
85,000.00
.00
.00
85,000.00
100.00
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
.14,09409-00282,
,5 7T
� ,.���.,
474 609.54
47.46
FUND TOTALS
1,,206,500.00
290 A 796.88
5M M3.62
667,516.38
55.32 %
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
PERSONAL SERVICES
48,480.00
3,664.15
10,001.96
38,478.04
79.36
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
55,275.00
1,333.33
3,203.77
52,071.23
94'.20
COMMODITIES
1,150.00
.00
.00
11150.00
100.00
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
2515,700.
9 191,.93
18,&? .5
239.4 48
92.72
FUND TOTALS
30O
14,189.41..
32,033.25
331,571,75
01.19%
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U H M A R Y
5/01/94 - 7/31/94
BUDGET CUR 140 Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
ggEEPRATE JP .. ...... . ..... JAILN21.0
�U_�Mg§ 0 4,, L 1973 ............... AtgUNT MAKE
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 15648M.00 M., 4 488, 50 15.3611 1.50 97.77
FUND TOTALS 11,11,564,800. 00 .00 3488.501 1534311-50 97.77 %
STRg,E Rov
IMP gMEN'T 8 & 11994A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1,5k,300.00 .00 99.92
FUND TOTALS 1546M.00Z?. 99.92 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES B 8 1, 1974
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE AM a 1-51.00, 15.00 g104135.00 95.45
FUND TOTALS 22041-50.00 15.E to & 915. 99 210,135. W 95.45 %
EMLIG ,IQMIFAC16IY @Ji 19878
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 335
760.00 218.87 32.723.87 303 036.13 90.25
FUND TOTALS 335 760.00 218.87 32J2'5:17 303,036.13 90.25 %
.P.0.6191 I FIRE BLDG 8 & I1MA
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 284 520.00 .00 2-99510-0.0 $9.62
FUND TOTALS 284 $29 - Mo .00 89.62 %
19938 REFUMM,B&I �- $71 4.9'1 .................... ......... . . ...
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 2379775.00 95,585.75 142,189.25 59.79
FUND TOTALS loo '214585.75 149. 1 59.79 %
NT041N RE EV NST 8 9 119870
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE -.71745.00 250.00 74872,50 63&72'.50 89.02
FUND TOTALS 7`19 745.00 250.00 79872.,,50... 63 9 872`.50 89-02 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E
S U M M A R Y
5/01/94 -
7/31/94
BUDGET
N'TXP
CUR NO
Y-T-D
ENDED
BUDGET
PERCENT
HUME
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
00,
12, 92P.M
$1.04
FUND TOTALS
X1.00
OQ
12.'290.,00
52 540.00
$1.04 X
DOWN R 9'9'1 B
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
384E
�
4 097.50
34,227.50
89.27
FUND TOTALS
1,22Q
____34 y, 097 .►0
89.27 X
MWNTOWN._ff&ftWMj B A 11992B
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
49. 15.004�0„7.50
446907420-
91.06
FUND TOTALS
9 , 1, • I
.._.4;7.5
44'50
91.06 X
DOWNTOWi S 11993A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
__ 1 g,l4,�i.00
00
�4���
77.04 .gQ
62.06
FUND TOTALS
�1941I .OD
47#096.00
�77„ l Oi4�
62.06 X
TOWN T B i 1994
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
�"��'.
�.,
__��4.'�?
9..�.95'�,8
97.60
FUND TOTALS
... 1Q���.
.00
244.17
9 955.._.. .83
97.60 %
FLoopN i 1991A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
Z.A.505,0
1700
89.98
FUND TOTALS
1. 9!4,7"Qp
�19
175 255.OQ-,
89.98 X
F TRO % I 1992A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
4%,,4855.
.00
60 251.?5
426 003.75,
87.60
FUND TOTALS
486 2,55.
.DD
b0a251,!.5
42+x,~005. Z5
87.60 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U it E
S U M M A R Y
5/01/94 -
7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y-T-D
BUDGET
PERCENT
12238 REFUN F` A
A T
EXP' ED
EXPENDED,,,,,,
CE,
! C
1
46.055.50
68,174.5_Q
59.6$
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
J � . �3,�
.00-
m
FUND TOTALS
i4
9955.5QOL
Ili 59
59.68 %
FLM CONTROL B.9 I 1994A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
47.000.E
.00
122.08_
.� T.92
99.74
FUND TOTALS
47 OQ
.00
122.08
46 877.92
99.74 %
MA E=l O
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
421.060.00.
.00
19,402.59
_ 4011
95.39
FUND TOTALS
4Z `91.
00
19.402.59
401 657.41
95.39 X
J SA #1 PROSP CT M` S '8 8I
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE,
�..9994L 0W0
3,220.
1Z99 99,
85.65
FUND TOTALS
; 440.00
.
3 ;;" . 00
1' g al- . 0.00
85.65 X
KBE
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
3322,1, 75.00
1
�. ' . 0 .
96.62
FUND TOTALS
11087.50
31 087.50.
96.62 X
sA #6 0-RG RT 8
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
36 975.00
.00
_ 10_,987.501
25 x.50
70.28
FUND TOTALS
1975_.gp
.00_,
10&987.50
5# 7.50
70.28 X
IMPROVEMENT FUN
.AL,,,,
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
41,000.00
w00
241,08
401,758.92
99.41
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U N M A R Y
5/01/94 - 7/31/94
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
AMMTe m
lim OUR . . . ....... M�g
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES U24 gm 4 QQ "99 -.71 19 z ol W -SHM 99.13
FUND TOTALS 870,000.00 .00 7,403.69 862
596.,31 99.14
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES .00 .00 260.00 22.00- .00
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE WAR 119,41 99.55
FUND TOTALS 99.33 %
MWITOWN REDEV2MT CMIST FUND,
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES -1.933,3001 55 g 413,94
j366.27 629933,73 67.49
FUND TOTALS 13
.1 j 300 -010 224453.98 zW,36627 M8933.71 67.49 %
,ITREET IMROVLMENT, M§T F.0.
. ......
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,045,000.00 .00 .00 3,045,000.00 100-00
INTERFUND TRANSFERS *JwwAl;ll� Ag, 1.99 1 3§QAQM.99 100.00
FUND TOTALS 3,992,6000,go ".99. lm_ , "3" amcmm 100.00 %
ELO-0-9-IM,, GMST FUM
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 94.97
FUND TOTALS
339,70.2. n 40 94.97 %
L
FM MTRQ ML Sl U
L _
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35,000.00 .00 1,480.00 33,520.00 95.77
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,550,000.06 374,391.00 374,391.00 1,175,609.00 75.84
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 48."501. 00 .00 -.00 5100. 100.00
FUND TOTALS 11 4-:51 6 5001, 00 174 d 391 . W
.. ... ---- ?z27 g 629. 00 76.98 %
V I L L A G E O F
M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D 6 E T E X P E
N D I T U R E
S U M M A R Y
5/01/94
- 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR MO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
PERSONA!. SERVICES
1,393,005.00 93 005.00
112 625.89
293,762.67
1,099,242.33
78.91
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,032,500.00
348,265.96
934,966.38
3,097,533.62
76.81
COMMODITIES
379,000.00
33,120.41
100,439.69
278,560.31
73.49
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
383,550.00
12,473.78
12,283.78
371,266.22
%.79
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
�176.3W.00,
82.08
42 711.'3
2;531..., 648 . 6T
84.54
FUND TOTALS
6464 415.00
506 568.12
„ 'I, ;i84 413.85
5 N 51.15
78.58 %
PARKIWI SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
-
PERSONAL SERVICES
25,675.00
1,906.59
5,630.37
20,044.63
78.07
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
69,750.00
2,240.71
22,769.74
46,980.26
67.35
COMMODITIES
5,800.00
388.04
710.38
5,089.62
87.75
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
.1i ._00.-.00
_.►
71. -,
100.00
FUND TOTALS
172A225.,00
4 535=34
29 110.49
143.114.51
83.09 X
MEHIC61 a§eLgfMjhiT F
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
,9804825.00
520 250.00
520 250.00
460,575.00
46.95
FUND TOTALS
980A825...00_
5220e�250.00
5204„250.00
460 5751.00
46.95 X
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
,x,16.500.00118
670.61
542.66$.52
2.073831.48
79.25
FUND TOTALS
24616,500
I 11, 670 1
5424
2,073 851.48
79.25 %
PNSLON FUND
PENSION EXPENSE
681.050.00
77.572.21
179,9M. 94
501 Al 11
73.57
FUND TOTALS
681105o.06
77 "572.21
179 938.94
501 111.Ob
73.57
V I L L A G E O F
M O U N T P R O S P E C T
b
B U it G E T E X P E N D I T U R E
S U M M A R Y
5/01/94
_ 4 - 7/31/94
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
F R N' S P NS IOM E -on,
ANT
EXPENDED
BALANCE-
_MILANSE
PENSION EXPENSE
677,550,00
754223-7§
j97 j ` . 4Q1
73.38
FUND TOTALS
677.5504
3„ .76
13,53 Q
497.19b.! D
73.38 X
KNEEll
PENSION EXPENSE
26,000.90
?.166.83
b 5 .49
'!9.494,,51
74.99
FUND TOTALS
+ 1
2.1bb 3
b.500�►9
11,1221
74.99 X
LI RARY FUN
LIBRARY OPERATIONS
3.a 216. tI00.00
.
4
100.00
FUND TOTALS
* ti0
.00
3.206.000.00
100:00 X
TOTAL EXP END I TURE S
501,165,385-010
3 , 92 „ 1„, ,,,3 , 79
9. 8,4 , g4 07 _
40.320.160.93
80.37 %
8/11/94
ORDINANCEf
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION OF
A CERTAIN QUESTION TO THE
ELECTORS OF THE ViLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Public Library has played a vital role In the community; and
M WHEREAS, the 1974 Library Board had the foresight to understand that the demand for library services
continually increases and designed the present building with a structure that can support a second floor;
and
WHEREAS, the community demand upon the Mount Prospect Public Library for Immediate, complete and
accurate Information in a variety of formats Is ever Increasing; and
WHEREAS, Increased funds are required in order to provide additional space and to pay for additional
operating costs necessary to continue to maintain the high level of services expected by the Mount
Prospect community from the Mount Prospect Public Library; and
WHEREAS, It has been determined by the Board of Library Trustees that an additional twenty-six cents
($0.25) per one hundred dollar ($100) equalized assessed valuation is necessary to accomplish this result,
thirteen cents ($0.13) of which will generate sufficient revenue to pay principal and Interest on bonds to be
Issued in the amount of $15.5 million dollars, and the remaining thirteen cents ($0.13) of which will generate
sufficient funds to cover additional operating costs prompted by the expansion; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a home rule unit within the meaning of the Constitution of
Illinois, 1970; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to a request developed and agreed upon by the Board of Library Trustees, the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect desire to submit to the electors of the
Village of Mount Prospect a proposition concerning the expansion of the Mount Prospect Public Library;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the following question be submitted to the electors of the Village of Mount Prospect
at the General Election to be held in November, 1994:
Shall the annual library tax for renovation. Yes
expansion, maintenance, aiid operation in the
Village of Mount Prospect he increased from
.27 percent to .53 percent? I No
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect, as the local election official, Is
directed hereby to file a certified copy hereof with the Cook County Clerk and within the time authorized by
law certify the public question to be submitted to the voters of the Village of Mount Prospect at the
aforesaid November, 1994 General Election to the election authority having jurisdiction over any of the
territory of the Village of Mount Prospect In which the aforesaid question Is to be submitted to referendum,
as well as all other persons authorized by law to receive such notice and/or certification.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval, and publication in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1994
Village President
ATTEST:
ORDINANCE NO.,
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
ILLI,N,QIS
BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, acting in the exercise of their home rule power;
aECTJ,O,N 1: That Chapter 13 of the Mount Prospect Village Code, as amended,
is hereby further amended by deleting Chapter 13 in its entirety and inserting a new
Chapter 13 which shall be and read as follows:
CHAPTER 13
ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS
Subject Article
General Provisions .....................I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
13.101
Definitions
13.102
License Required
13.103
Application for Retailer's License
13.104
Management Entities
13.105
Restrictions on Issuance of Licenses
13.106
Term -Prorating Fee
13.107
Licenses and Permits
13.108
Number of Licenses
13.109
Disposition of Fees
13.110
Application Process Completed
13.111
Compensation, Powers and Duties of Local Liquor
Control Commissioner
13.112
Penalties Upon Hearing Before the Local Liquor
Control Commissioner
13.113
Transfer of License
13.114
Renewal of License
13.115
Change of Location
13.116
Consumption on Premises
13.117
Restrictions on Premises
13.118
Closing Hours; Sunday Closing
13.119
Peddling
13.120
Compliance with Building, Sanitary, Safety and
other Regulations of the Village
13.121
Entertainment
13.122
Prohibited Conduct
13.123
Fighting Prohibited; Licensees Conduct
13.124
Dram Shop Insurance
13.125
Conduct of Employees and Agents
13.126
Sale to Intoxicated Persons; Habitual Drunkards
13.127
Prohibited Sale or Promotion of Alcoholic Beverages
13.128
Prohibited Sale of Refrigerated Alcoholic Liquor
in Single Containers
13.129
Regulations with Respect to Underage Persons
13.130
Consequences of Facilitating the Use of Alcoholic
Beverages by Underage Persons
13.131
Use of False Identification
13-132
False Identification not a Defense
13.133
Operation of a Motor Vehicle While in a State
of Impairment
13.134
Operation of a Motor Vehicle by Underage Persons
With an Alcoholic Beverage in or on the Vehicle;
When the Underage Person is Impaired Due to
Alcohol or has Alcohol in the System or is
Operating the Vehicle in Violation of a
Restriction Pursuant to this Chapter
13.135
Procedure for Driving Restriction Notification;
Hearing
13.136
Penalty for Violating Driving Restriction
13.137
Penalties; General
Sec. 13.101. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the following
terms as used in this Chapter shall be construed according to the
definitions given below.
ALCOHOLIC A. Any spirits, wine, beer, ale or other
BEVERAGES or liquid intended as a beverage and containing
LIQUOR: more than one-half of one percent (.5%) of
alcohol by volume
B. Any beverage containing any scientifically detectable
trace of alcohol and commonly known as "near beer" I
„nonalcoholic beer", or "nonalcoholic wine", whose taste,
color, odor and consistency are similar to the alcoholic
beverages known as beer and wine and, except for the
reduced alcohol content, is marketed as being similar to
beer or wine.
BAR: A barrier or counter, at and over which alcoholic liquors and
sometimes food are passed or served.
BEER: A beverage obtained by alcoholic fermentation or infusion in
a brew or concoction of barley or other grain, malt or hops,
in water. This shall include beer, light beer, ale, stout, lager
beer, porter and other similar brews.
CATERER: A person who for compensation provides food and service
for a banquet, dinner or other special occasion and where
the recipients of the food or service are specifically invited
to each particular event.
N�► Miiefi
PREMISES: The legal or beneficial ownership, rental, lease or holding of
a license shall constitute control of property- Control may
also exist where none of the aforesaid legal relationships
apply, but where an adult is otherwise in charge of or
charged with controlling a particular premises.
DELIVERY OF The sale, giving or exchange of an alcoholic
ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR,* liquor from one person to another. Delivery is meant to
include the provision of any alcoholic beverage by whatever
means to one person from another.
DRIVE-IN A food service establishment with or without
RESTAURANT: interior facilities for eating, which'
caters to and permits the
consumption offood either in customer's automobile parking
on the premises or in any other designate d area on the
premises outside the establishment where the food is so
prepared. "Drive -In Restaurant" shall not be construed to
include "Restaurant".
ENTERTAINMENT: Any playing of pre-recorded music or voices or any live act
or performance whether or not using sound amplification.
FALSE Any document used for identification or proof
IDENTIFICATION.- of age that has been altered or defaced or that contains
false or misleading information or that contains a name that
is not the actual name of the person using it.
FIGHTING: Any threatening or touching of another person which
provokes or tends to provoke a breach of the peace.
GENERAL PUBLIC: The whole body politic including the people of the
neighborhood, the Village, the State of Illinois, the United
States of America, and/or persons at large travelling through
the Village, as different from the designation of a particular
person or group of persons.
HOTEL: Every building or other structure, kept, used, maintained,
advertised and held out to the public to be a place where
food is actually prepared, served and consumed and
sleeping accommodations are offered for pay to travelers
and guests, whether transient, permanent or residential, in
which twenty five (25) or more rooms are used for sleeping
accommodations and where dining rooms are maintained in
the same building or buildings.
IMPAIRMENT: Any diminution or compromise of a person's physical, mental
or perceptual abilities due to the consumption of an alcoholic
beverage. Impairment does not require that the blood
alcohol content be in excess of any particular gram of
alcohol to milliliters of blood or breath ratio.
LICENSE or That specific grant of the privilege and authority to a
LIQUOR LICENSE: licensee to sell or offer for sale alcoholic liquor
at retail in the manner set forth in the text of the particular
license classification.
LICENSEE: That person who by issuance of a license has been given
the right or privilege by the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner to engage in the retail sale of alcoholic liquor
in the Village. This shall include the holder of a Mount
Prospect liquor license or any officer, principal, employee or
agent of the license holder.
LOCAL LIQUOR The office of the Mayor or the President of the Village;
CONTROL as assisted by appropriate legal counsel; this may include
-3-
COMMISSION: such other persons as the Mayor may appoint to aid in the
exercise of the powers and the performance of the duties
of the Local Liquor Control Commissioner.
LOCAL LIQUOR The Mayor or President of the Board of
CONTROL Trustees of the Village acting ex -officio.
COMMISSIONER:
LOUNGE: That portion of a licensed premises that is kept, used,
maintained, advertised and held out to the public as a place
where alcoholic liquor is offered for retail sale for
consumption on the premises only and not necessarily in
conjunction with the full service of meals. This definition
may also include the term "cocktail lounges".
MAINTENANCE OF That standard by which it shall be determined
ORDER STANDARD: whether a licensee has maintained order on the licensed
premises. Adherence to this standard shall be a duty of the
licensee and shall generally be stated as the establishment
and maintenance of the optimum precautions and actions
that are practical for deterring and preventing fighting as
defined in this Chapter.
OPERATION OF A
MOTOR VEHICLE: The operation or control of a motor vehicle anywhere in the
Village of Mount Prospect, whether on private or public
property. To be in physical control, the person need not be
actually driving the motor vehicle and the vehicle need not
be running. If there is only one person inside of a motor
vehicle, that person shall be presumed to be in physical
control regardless of the person's location within the vehicle.
If there is only one person in a front seat or front passenger
area of a motor vehicle, that person shall be presumed to be
in physical control regardless of the person's location in the
front passenger area. If there are persons in the vehicle, but
not in the front passenger area, the owner of the vehicle or
the person to whom permission was given to operate the
vehicle, shall be presumed to be in physical control of the
vehicle.
ORIGINAL PACKAGE: Any bottle, flask, jug, can, cask, barrel, keg, hogshead or
other receptacle or container whatsoever, used, corked or
capped, sealed and labeled by the manufacturer of alcoholic
liquor to contain and to convey any alcoholic liquor.
PARENT: A natural or adoptive parent or a court designated guardian.
PRIVATE CLUB: A not-for-profit corporation supported by the dues of its
members and organized solely for the promotion of some
common objective other than the sale or consumption of
alcoholic liquors.
RESTAURANT- Any public place, without sleeping accommodations,
maintained, and held out to the public as a place primarily
devoted to full-service, sit-down dining, including dinner
and/or luncheon menus at which the service of alcoholic
liquor is incidental and complementary to the service of such
meals. Limited food service, as typically provided by drive-in
restaurants, luncheonettes, diners, coffee shops, fast food
.operations, and similar uses, does not satisfy the
requirements of this definition.
-4-
RETAIL SALE.: The sale or delivery of an alcoholic beverage to the
consumer or general public as differentiated from the sale or
delivery for legal resale.
SPIRITS..:. Any beverage which contains alcohol obtained by distillation,
mixed with water or other solution and includes brandy, rum,
whiskey, gin or other spirituous liquors and such liquors
when rectified, blended or otherwise mixed with alcohol or
other substances.
SUPPER CLUB.* Any public place kept, used, maintained, advertised and
held out to the public as a place where patrons are served
food and offered live entertainment.
UNDERAGE PERSON.- Any person under twenty one (21) years of
age.
VICARIOUS That liability which is implied as a matter
LIABILITY: of law even though the person may not have
directly caused an injury to another person.
WINE- Any alcoholic beverage obtained by the fermentation of the
natural contents of fruits or vegetables containing sugar,
including such beverages when fortified by the addition of
alcohol or spirits, as above defined.
Sec. 13.102. License Required.
A. It shall be unlawful to sell at retail any alcoholic liquor without first having
obtained a Village retailer's license for each location, place or premises where
the retailer is located.
B. Where two (2) or more such locations, places or premises are under the same
roof or at the same street address, a separate Village retailer's license shall be
obtained for each such location, place or premises. Nothing in this section shall
prevent any hotel operator licensed under the provisions of this Chapter from
serving liquor to registered guests in any room or other part of the hotel, if the
liquor is kept in and served from a licensed location, within the hotel. This shall
include the maintenance of a unit within an individual guest room corn monly
known as a mini bar or an honor bar. This may also apply to a licensee at a
restaurant premises within a hotel even if the restaurant operator does not own
the hotel or operate the hotel business so long as the licensee is a lessee of the
restaurant premises, has written authority from the hotel operator to deliver
alcohol throughout the hotel pursuant to this section and has notified the Liquor
Commissioner in writing of its intent to do so. Both the hotel operator and
restaurant operator must qualify as a licensee in this circumstance. Only one
restaurant operator within a hotel may be granted this privilege. If a
restauranteur within a hotel, does not provide room service then the owner or
operator of the hotel must possess a separate hotel license in order to provide
such room service.
C. The issuance to or possession by any person of a retail liquor dealer tax stamp
issued for a current tax period by the United States Government or any of its
agencies shall constitute prima facie evidence that such person is subject to the
provisions of this Chapter.
D. Within fifteen (15) days after obtaining a license pursuant to the provisions of this
Section, the licensee shall obtain a similar liquor license required by the State for
the sale at retail of any alcoholic liquor. However, no alcoholic beverage may be
purveyed by the -licensee until the state license has been obtained.
-5-
Sec. 13.103. Application for Retailer's License.
A. Application for a local retailer's liquor license shall be made to the Village
President as Local Liquor Control Commissioner. The application shall be in
writing, upon forms provided by the Local Liquor Control Commissioner. The
application shall require such information as determined by the Local Liquor
Control Commissioner. Only completed forms shall be considered by the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner. Each application shall be accompanied by a non-
refundable application fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00).
B. Upon issuance of any license, the licensee shall keep the information contained
on the application current by furnishing to the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner, within thirty (30) days, written notice of any change in status
regarding ownership, residency, management, surety bond or any other
information set forth in the application.
C. I Before any license shall be issued to the applicant:
1 The applicant shall furnish to the Village a surety bond in the amount of
two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) against any violation by the
principal, the principal's agents or employees, of any of the terms of this
Chapter 13, or any ordinances, rules and regulations or penalties now in
force or which may hereafter be in force in the Village affecting the
operation of the licensed business. The surety company must be
acceptable to the Village.
2. Each principal, owner, partner, officer or stockholder owning an
aggregate of more than five percent (5%) of the stock of -a corporation
shall appear at the Mount Prospect Police Department for fingerprinting so
that an adequate investigation may be performed to enable the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner to ascertain whether the issuance of a
license will comply with the statutes of the State of Illinois and all
applicable ordinances of the Village. The fingerprints shall be processed
by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The fee to the Federal Bureau of
Investigation shall be prepaid by the applicant by cashier's check, money
order or certified check.
Sec. 13.104. Management Entities.
It is recognized that a licensee may, from time to time, desire to hire or retain, as
an independent contractor, a management entity to manage, generally operate
and be responsible for the licensed premises.
No licensee shall permit a management entity to perform such a function unless
the management entity has been certified to do so by the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner. In order to be certified by the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner, a management entity must execute a liquor license application
that reflects the entity's business status, i.e. sole proprietorship, partnership or
corporation. A management entity must qualify in the same manner (other than
for a surety bond and dram shop coverage) and meet the same standards as a
licensee.
The application shall be accompanied by a non-refundable application fee of two
hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) and no management entity may be qualified
unless a certification fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) has been paid.
A management entity shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Local Liquor
Control Commissioner in the same manner as a licensee. If there is a violation
WOE
on the ' premises, the management company and the licensee shall be jointly and
severally responsible.
Sec. 13.105. Restrictions on Issuance of Licenses.
A. Restrictions on any business entity desiring to hold a liquor license.
1. No liquor license shall be issued to any 11 entity:
a. Whose business is conducted by a manager or agent who is not an
actual employee of the licensee, unless the manager or agent
possesses the same qualifications required of the licensee, and
has been certified by the Local Liquor Control Commissioner.
b. Which does not legally or beneficially own the premises for which a
license is sought, or does not have a lease for the full period for
which the license is to be issued.
C. Which is not an owner of at least fifty percent (50%) of the business
to be operated by the licensee.
d. Which does not hold a valid Mount Prospect Class 11 business
license for the premises as required by Chapter 12 of the Village
Code.
e. To which a Federal gaming device stamp or a Federal wagering
stamp has been issued by the Federal Government for the current
tax period.
f. Not eligible for a State retail liquor dealer's license,
9 Which, upon review of the application taken as a whole by the
Local Liquor Control Commissioner, is deemed by prior actions as
indicated from the application or background check to be a
substantial risk of not abiding by the regulations of the Village of
Mount Prospect.
2. No liquor license shall be issued to any entity when a sole proprietor,
partner, manager, officer, director or 5% or greater shareholder:
a. Has been found guilty of a felony or any offense with regard to the
sale or possession of alcoholic liquor, or of any other crime
opposed to decency or morality, if, upon due investigation, the
Commissioner determines that such individual has not been
sufficiently rehabilitated to warrant the public trust.
b. Has previously had a liquor license in this or any other jurisdiction
revoked for cause.
C. At the time of application for renewal of any license issued
hereunder, would not have been eligible for a license upon a first
application.
d. Has been found guilty of a violation of any Federal or State law
concerning the manufacture of alcoholic liquor.
e. Has been issued a Federal gaming device stamp or Federal
wagering stamp by the Federal Government for the current tax
period.
W
f. Has been found guilty of a gambling offense as prescribed by any
Subsections (a) (3) through (a) (10) of Section 28-1 of, or as
prescribed by Section 28-3 of, the Criminal Code of 1961,
approved July 28, 1961, as heretofore amended, or as prescribed
.by a statute replacing any of the aforesaid statutory provisions.
9. Is an employee of the Village of Mount Prospect, the Village
President or member of the Board of Trustees.
h. Who is not of good character and reputation in the community in
which the individual resides.
B. Additional restrictions applying to Corporations only.
No liquor license shall be issued to any Corporation unless it is incorporated in
Illinois, or unless it is a foreign corporation which is qualified and registered under the
Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois.
To whom a Federal wagering stamp or a Federal gaming device stamp has been
issued for the current tax period.
C. Additional restrictions applying to sole proprietorships or partnerships only. No
liquor license shall be issued to any sole proprietorship or partnership if any sole
proprietorship or partner:
1" Is not a resident of the Village.
2. Is not a citizen of the United States.
Sec. 13.106., Term; Prorating Fee.
A. Each license shall commence on May 1 and shall terminate on April 30 next
following the date of issuance.
B. License fees shall not be prorated except in the following instances:
1 Where the license is obtained after the first day of May of any license year
the fee shall be reduced in proportion to the number of full calendar
months that have expired in the license term.
2 Where the license is returned by the license holder upon the permanent
closing of the business, and not upon the sale or transfer of the business
or assets thereof, the fee paid shall be returned in proportion to the
number of full calendar months which have not expired in the license
term, less an administrative fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00).
Sec. 13.107. Licenses and Permits.
A. Except as may be provided for the issuance of certain permits under the terms of
Subsection (B), every person engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic liquor in the
Village shall first have obtained the appropriate liquor license authorizing the sale
and delivery of the specific type and character of alcoholic liquor and the specific
type of business at which it may be sold.
1. All new, transferred or renewed licenses issued after August 16, 1994,
shall be divided into the following classifications: (No license may be
issued unless it complies with the restrictions of one of these
classification).
IF6161111!
Cor bioation License,, which shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer
for sale at retail, in the premises specified in such license, alcoholic liquor
for consumption on said premises and also alcoholic liquor in its original
package but not for consumption on the premises where sold. (Available
only to. a licensee holding a valid Combination license as of August 16,
1994.) (CLASS "All)
Tavern License, which shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for
sale at retail, in the premises specified in such license, alcoholic liquor for
consumption on said premises. At the minimum, food service such as
snacks, hors d'oeuvres and/or similar food items shall be available, in
quantities sufficient to serve all patrons of said premises, at all times when
alcoholic liquor is served. (CLASS "B")
Gene ra I -Package License which shall authorize the licensee to sell and
offer for sale at retail, in the premises specified in such license, alcoholic
liquor in its original package only but not for consumption on the premises
where sold. Samplings of alcoholic liquor in conjunction with sales
promotional efforts shall be allowed pursuant to the regulations contained
in Section 13.116 of this Chapter. No General Package License shall be
issued for a premises whose primary business is the sale of groceries or
other products unless the premises occupies at least 10,000 square feet
of floor area. No General Package license shall be issued to any
establishment which also delivers gasoline for automotive vehicles on the
same premises. (CLASS 11C11)
Cl u,t, License for issuance to private clubs as defined in this Chapter,
which shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail, in the
premises specified in such license alcoholic liquor to its members and
guests only for consumption on the premises. No license shall be issued
to a private club unless the following requirements are met:
1. The organization must own or lease a premises of sufficient size
and character for the reasonable and comfortable use and
accommodation of its members and their guests.
2. Contain a suitable and adequate kitchen and dining room space
and equipment.
3. Maintain a sufficient number of employees or competent
volunteers for cooking, preparing and serving food and meals for its
members and guests.
4. Its affairs and management are conducted by a Board of Directors,
Executive Committee, or similar body chosen by the members at
their annual meeting and that no member or any officer, agent or
employee of the club is paid, or directly receives, in the form of
salary or other compensation, any profits from the distribution or
sale of alcoholic liquor to the club, or its members, or guests
beyond the amount of such salary as may be fixed and voted at
any annual meeting by the members or by its Board of Directors or
other governing body out of the general revenue of the club.
(CLASS D)
QLateringLLiceose, for issuance to caterers, which shall authorize the licensee
to sell and offer for sale at retail alcoholic liquor for consumption on the
premises where sold. Consumption of alcoholic liquor at or over a bar shall
be permitted, but all consumption shall be limited to those patrons who are
invited guests and dining on the premises specified in such license. (CLASS
E)
Food, Court License, which shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for
sale at retail, alcoholic liquor for consumption on the premises where sold,
and only in conjunction with the operation of a food service court located in
a shopping mall. Any consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be limited
to those patrons who are dining in a specified area of the food service court.
The specified area shall be separate from but contiguous to the main food
service court, and shall not exceed eight thousand (8,000) square feet in
total floor area. The premises shall be maintained as an area separate and
apart from the general shopping mall with definite and restricted points of
ingress and egress prohibiting the removal of alcoholic beverages from this
specified area. (CLASS F)
Park,strict License, for issuance to park districts only which shall authorize
—DI; se,,
the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail for consumption on the
premises specified in the license application, beer and wine only.
Additionally, other alcoholic beverages may be served at special events up
to thirty (30) times per year provided that the Village Manager shall be
notified in writing of each special event at least five (5) days in advance of
the event. This Park District License shall permit only the park district, its
agents or employees to sell or deliver an alcoholic beverage and shall not
permit other parties using park district facilities to sell or deliver alcoholic
beverages. (CLASS G)
-witb Entertainment Li ,n , for issuance to supper clubs, which
shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail, alcoholic liquor
for consumption on the premises where sold. The licensed premises shall
have a total floor area of not less than five thousand five hundred (5,500)
square feet. Consumption of alcoholic liquor at or over a bar is specifically
prohibited for this Class of license. At the minimum, food service such as hot
or cold sandwiches or similar food items shall be offered at all times when
alcoholic liquor is served. Such a club must have an adequate and sanitary
kitchen and dining room equipment and capacity and have employed a
sufficient number and kind of employees to prepare, cook and serve a
suitable full-service food menu and provide suitable entertainment for its
guests. Drink minimums, such as those requiring patrons of a supper club
to purchase one or more alcoholic beverages as a condition' of entrance to
the premises are specifically prohibited. The live entertainment at a supper
club must meet all requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect and the
State of Illinois. (CLASS H)
hotel' License, for issuance to hotels, motels, motor inns or motor lodges
which shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail, in the
premises specified in the license, alcoholic liquor to guests of the hotel,
motel, motor inn or motor lodge in the rooms occupied by guests on the
premises. If a restaurant and/or lounge is operated on the premises of the
licensee, the licensee may also sell alcoholic beverages to patrons of the
restaurant under such terms and conditions as may be determined by the
Local Liquor Control Commissioner or if no specific terms are determined,
according to the regulations governing restaurants and lounges. (CLASS M)
Wine, and Beer Qnly Package license, which shall authorize the licensee to
sell and offer for sale at retail, at the premises specified in the license, wine
and beer in the original package only, but not for consumption upon the
premises where sold. Samplings shall be permitted only in conjunction with
sales promotional efforts and pursuant to the regulations contained in
Section 13.116 of this Chapter. No Wine and Beer Only Package License
shall be issued for a premises whose primary business is the sale of
groceries or other products unless the premises occupies at least 10,000
square feet of floor area. No Wine and Beer Only Package License shall be
issued to any establishment which also delivers gasoline for automotive
vehicles on the same premises. (CLASS P)
Restaurant Only—License, for issuance to restaurants, which shall authorize
the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail, alcoholic liquor for consumption
on the premises where sold. Consumption of alcoholic liquor at or over a bar
is specifically prohibited and any consumption of alcoholic beverages shall
be limited to those patrons who are dining in the restaurant. (CLASS R)
tgu irantlwith Lou nge License, for issuance to restaurants maintaining a
---
separate lounge area as an incidental and accessory use, which shall
authorize the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail, in the restaurant
portion of the premises specified in the license, alcoholic liquor for
consumption on the premises only with meals, and in the lounge portion of
the premises specified in the license, alcoholic liquor for consumption on said
premises, with or without the service of food. The premises licensed herein
shall be primarily devoted to the preparation, cooking and serving of meals
and the lounge area shall contain less than twenty five percent (25%) of the
floor area of the premises and shall not be divided into two (2) or more
locations within said premises. Full food service including dinner and/or
luncheon menus, shall be offered at all times while alcoholic liquor is served.
(CLASS S)
Bowling Allft Licensp-, for issuance to bowling alleys, which shall authorize
the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail alcoholic beverages,, in the
lounge, for consumption on the premises where sold. The premises must in
fact operate as a bowling alley and offer their patrons full bowling facilities
with alcoholic liquor service incidental to bowling. The lounge area of such
premises licensed herein shall contain less than twenty five percent (25%)
of the floor area of the premises and shall not be divided into two (2) or more
locations within said premises. Food service shall be available to patrons at
all times when liquor is served. (CLASS T)
.at,ng,Only,Pack ae Liq ns , shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for
sale at retail, in the premises specified in such license, wine in its original
package only but not for consumption on the premises where sold.
Samplings of wine in conjunction with sales promotional efforts shall be
allowed pursuant to the regulations contained in Section 13.116 of this
Chapter. No Wine Only Package License shall be issued for a premises
whose primary business is the sale of groceries or other products unless the
premises occupies at least 10,000 square feet of floor area. No Wine Only
Package License shall be issued to any establishment which also delivers
gasoline for automotive vehicles on the same premises. (CLASS V)
I _Jggrant. W" :w and B License, for issuance to restaurants,
Rgs ing-g- a 1 --per Onlywhich
shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail, beer and wine
for consumption on the premises where sold. Consumption of alcoholic
liquor at or over a bar is specifically prohibited and any consumption of beer
and wine shall be limited to those patrons who are dining in such restaurant.
(CLASS W)
Li m-:Lsuw-ith Special, Conditions. Nothing in this section shall prevent the
Corporate Authorities from creating, from time to time, conditional licenses
which are based on the license classifications set forth above, but which
contain additional conditions and restrictions. These licenses with special
conditions, while created by the Corporate Authorities, shall remain subject
to issuance by the Local Liquor Control Commissioner. (CLASS XX).
2. All Restaurant with Lounge, Pre -1986 licenses are for Restaurant with
Lounge Licenses which were originally issued prior to March 4, 1986 and
subsequently renewed by that licensee and shall be defined as follows:
Restaurant with L,oungeLicepse,, E[,p-1,9 , for issuance to restaurants
maintaining a separate lounge area as an accessory use, which shall
authorize the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail, in the restaurant
portion of the premises specified in such license, alcoholic liquor for
consumption on said premises only with meals, and in the lounge portion of
the premises specified in such license, alcoholic liquor for consumption on
said premises, with or without ,the service of food. The premises licensed
herein shall be primarily devoted to the preparation, cooking and serving of
meals and the lounge area shall contain less than twenty five percent (25%)
of the floor area of the premises. (CLASS S1)
I Each such licensee shall pay an annual fee for such license in the amount
set forth below:
License Classification 8nnual LicenseFge
Class A
$21500.00
Class B
21000.00
Class C
21000.00
Class D
750.00
Class E
21000.00
Class F
21000.00
Class G
750.00
Class H
21000.00
Class M
21500.00
Class P
11750.00
Class R
29000.00
Class S & S1
2,500.00
Class T
21500.00
Class V
11500.00
Class W
11500.00
Class XX
21500.00
Management entity
750.00
B. Lounges shall be permitted only in conjunction with Combination License, Tavern
License, Hotel License, Restaurant with Lounge License, Restaurant with Lounge
License, Pre -1986 or Bowling Alley Licenses.
C. The Local Liquor Control Commissioner may grant a daily permit to any nonprofit
organization or club located within the Village such as a church, fraternal order or
lodge, veterans organization, civic organization, or other similar organization,
authorizing the sale of alcoholic beverages at any picnic, carnival, or similar function
sponsored or given by such organization. No more than twelve (12) such daily
permits shall be issued to any one such organization during the period of one year.
D, The Local Liquor Control Commissioner may grant a daily special event permit to
the Mount Prospect Library Board of Trustees authorizing the sale or delivery of
alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises of the Mount Prospect Public
Library, Ten South Emerson Street.
E. The restrictions on a particular license classification shall be binding on the licensee
and no premises may be operated in violation of the classification restrictions.
Sec. 13.108. Number of Licenses.
A. The Corporate Authorities shall determine, by ordinance, the number of licenses
that are available in each classification. Neither the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner nor any other person or entity may issue liquor licenses in a number
that is in excess of the number authorized by the Corporate Authorities. An up to
date schedule of the authorized number of licenses available in each classification
shall be maintained by the Village Manager for the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner. -
-12-
B. Upon the alienation, sale, transfer, assignment or donation of the business that
underlies the license to any third party or person other than the licensee, the liquor
license shall automatically become void and the number of available licenses in that
classification as authorized by the Corporate Authorities shall automatically and
immediately be reduced by one. I
C. Any licensed establishment that has discontinued the sale or service of alcoholic
liquor or that has not been open for business at least four (4) days per week for a
period of thirty (30) days or more shall automatically forfeit its license. Upon
forfeiture of the license, the number of available licenses in that classification as
authorized by the Corporate Authorities shall automatically and immediately be
reduced by one. This forfeiture shall not apply in instances where the licensee has
previously notified the Village Manager, in writing, of an intent to close the premises
for a portion of a year for remodelling or other similar purpose.
Sec. 13.109. Disposition of Fees.
All fees shall be made payable to the Village and submitted to the Local Liquor
Control Commissioner at the time application is made. The fee shall be immediately turned
over to the Finance Department. In the event the license applied for is denied, the fee,
except for the non-refundable application fee, shall be returned to the applicant.
Sec. 13.110. Application Process Completed.
No license may be issued by the Local Liquor Control Commissioner until all
information and documentation required in the application has been provided, all of the
reports from the various departments and agencies with respect to background checks
have been completed and all fees have been paid. The foregoing notwithstanding, the
Local Liquor Control Commissioner may, at the Commissioner's sole discretion, issue a
temporary license prior to the completion of a background check under the following
circumstances:
A The temporary license shall not exceed ninety (90) days.
B. No information currently exists which would cause the applicant to be
ineligible for a license.
C. The licensee has demonstrated, in writing, that the business will most likely
not survive if the license is not granted immediately.
D. The licensee executes a release and hold harmless statement that is
satisfactory to the Village Attorney and absolutely absolves the Village, its
officers or employees of any liability for the refusal of the Local Liquor
Control Commissioner to subsequently issue a regular license.
Sec. 13.111. Compensation, Powers and Duties of Local Liquor Control
Commissioner.
A. The Local Liquor Control Commissioner shall receive as compensation the sum of
three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) annually, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly
installments.
B. Any change in the compensation or fringe benefits provided for the Local Liquor
Control Commissioner shall be made by ordinance adopted not less than one
hundred twenty (120) days nor more than one hundred fifty (150) days prior to the
date set for the election of the Village Trustees.
-13-
C. The Local Liquor Control Commissioner shall have all of the powers, functions and
duties delegated to that office by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the ordinances
of the Village. This shall include, but in no way shall be limited to, the power to
require any licensee, at any time, to produce any and all records, that directly or
indirectly relate to the operation of the licensee's premises.
D. In addition to any other powers set forth in this Chapter 13, the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner may immediately suspend, pending a hearing within fifteen (15) days
of service of notice of suspension, the privilege of delivering alcoholic beverages of
any licensee who does not display a currently valid state or local liquor license or
who in the judgment of the Local Liquor Control Commissioner is operating the
business in such a manner as to endanger the health or safety & patrons of the
premises or of the community.
Sec. 13.112. Penalties Upon Hearing Before the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner.
Upon due investigation of any claim of violation, the Village Manaiger, Village
Attorney or Village Prosecutor may file charges with the 'Local Liquor Control
Commissioner alleging such a violation. The Local Liquor Control Commissioner shall then
have the authority to conduct a public hearing, pursuant to the required public notice, on
those charges in accordance with this Chapter 13. Additionally, if a written complaint of
a violation by a licensee, attested to by any five Village residents, is made to the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner, the Commissioner shall, within thirty days of receipt of the
complaint, either schedule a hearing on the complaint or respond to the residents in writing
explaining why a hearing is not necessary.
A. After a hearing on any alleged violation, if the Village President, as Local Liquor
Control Commissioner, finds that there was any violation of the ordinances of the
Village or statutes of the State, or that there was any other activity or omission of
the licensee for which a penalty should be imposed, the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner may suspend or revoke any retail liquor dealer's licenses, or may fine
the licensee. The fine may be in addition to a revocation or suspension.
1 If the Commissioner decides to suspend the license, the term of the
suspension shall not be less than one day nor more than thirty (30) days.
2. If the Commissioner elects to fine the licensee, the amount of the fine shall
not be less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor more than two thousand five
hundred dollars ($2,500.00). However, any failure of a license to fulfill an
affirmative duty set forth in this Chapter 13 shall subject the licensee to a
mandatory minimum penalty of five hundred dollars ($500.00).
3. If the Commissioner finds the licensee to be guilty of any charges, the
licensee will be responsible for all costs incurred for a hearing before the
Local Liquor Control Commissioner, including, but not limited to court
reporter fees, witness fees and attorneys fees. This shall be in addition to
any other penalties assessed against the licensee.
B. All proceedings before the Local Liquor Control Commissioner shall be recorded
and placed in a certified official record of such proceedings taken and prepared by
a certified court reporter.
C. The appeals procedure as set forth by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village under Resolution 3-72 of the Village are as set forth in this Section,
including:
1. In the event of any appeal from an order or action of the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner, the appeal to the Illinois State Liquor Commission shall be
limited to a review of the official record of the proceedings before the Local
-14-
91,
BUISE joap ujojJ pajuanajd aq IOU llegs sailuagIne ajejodjoo aqj 'jagajn_j `joadsojd junoVy
ui uoijejado jo AGolsiq pue punojb� oeq s,aasuaoil aqj JO Mainaj 10 Jgbij s,jauoIssiujWOO
10jIu00 jonbij leoo-1 aqj of joafgns A19191dwoo aq llegs Inq 'IgblJ pajsan a se panjlsuoo
aq IOU llegs aBalinijd leMauaj sig1 `asodjnd 1egj jol algelins aje Igbnos si asuaoil
leMauaj aqj goigM jol sasiwaid aqj pue asuaoil a anlaoaJ of p94ilenb uagj si jueoildde
aqj 1egj 'papinojd 'uoijejidxa uodn asuaoil aqj Mauaj of Aidde Aew easueoll Auy
•sesuaoi-i algelleAV ul aseaa08(3 `asu931-110 leMauaN ev � G'£ � goes
`asuaoil Mau a job. Aldde Ilegs aasuaoil 9g1 u941 'japlogajegs a se uoijeoildde
aqj ui paweu Alluanno IOU si oqM uosjad a of pajjalsuejl ajt sejegs aqj 11
pue papou aq llegs uoissiwwoo lojluoo jonbij leool agj 'uoijejodjoo play iClasolo
e ui sajegs aqj jo ajow jo (%q) juawad anis fiuiuMo uosjad Aue jo gjeap aqj uodn
'Isar. saujao janagoigM aajsnjj jo janiaoaj a jo juawpodde
10 alep aqj ujojj sgjuouj (g) xis 10 abessed aqj pun jo asuaoil aqj jo uoilejidxa
eqj pun jinoo aleudojdde aqj jo japjo aapun asuaoil builsixe aqj japan sseuisnq
aqj jo uoijejado aqj anupoo Aew aaIsnjj jo janiaoaj aqj 'Aoldni�ueg jol Se6
jo digsjaniaoaj oJui pajapjo si panssi uaaq seg asuaoil a wogM of uoijejodjoo a 1i
`aasuaoij aqj jo Aouanlasui jo holdniMueq
'gleap aql jade sgjuouj (9) xis uegj jafiuol IOU Inq 'asuaoil aqj jo uoilmidxa
aqj pun AoldniMueq jo Aouanlosui gons jo 'juapaoap jo gjeap 9g1 ja:.e aasuaotl
IdniMueq jo Juanlosui jo paseaoap agj 10 saBalinijd eqj asiojaxa Aew ae1snjj jo
'jalejlsiuiwpe 'jolnoexa aql 'saseo gons uI `linoo a;eijdojdde aql jo japjo eql aapun
jonbil oilogoole jo ales aqj jo ssauisnq aqj anuiluoo 4jauoissiwwoo lojluoo jonbi l
leoo-I eqj 01 aoijou uapm uodn 'Aew jonbil oilogaole jo ped ui s;sisuoo ajelsa
aqj uagM 'aasuaoil jdnj�ueq jo Juanlosui Aue jo 991snjj aqj pue 'aasuaoll paseaoap
Aue jo ajelse aqj jo sjaleipuiujpe jo siolnoaxe aqj 'janaMoH `uoijnlanap ajelsajui
J0 alelsal jo sMel aqj Aq puaosap IOU llegs pue aasuaoll a 10 jauljed a jo aasueoil
aqI jo gjeap aqj uodn aseao llegs digsjau:ped a jo lenpinipui ue of panssi asuaoil y
`uoijejodjoo aqj jo slasse jo �oojs aqj
10 (%0q) Juawad 4U uegj ajow jo jalsuejl jo ales aqj buinlonui uoiIoesuejl jagjo
Aue jo janaa)lej a 'Ino �Cnq a uaaq seg ajagj ji pion pue llnu aujooaq llegs asuaoil
aqj pue paidwal.e uaaq aneq al paweap aq IIiM jalsuejI leball! ue 'uoijejodjoo
oilqnd a of sb •Tools aqj 10 (%og) juawad A44 uegj ssal play Alsnainajd oqM uosjad
j9g1oue 01 Tools 9141 sJ@JsueJI NOOIS aqI Jo ajow jo (%OZ) juawad Ajugmj 6uiuMa
uosjad Aue 11 pion pue llnu awooaq llegs asuaoil aqj pue paidwal4e uaaq aneq 01
pawaap aq II!M jajsuejj leballi ue 'uoijejodjoo plaq Alasolo e of sy `uoijejapisuoo
jai. IOU jo uoilejapisuoo jol japa algejalsuejl ;au si asuaoil aql `pajeoagjodAq jo
pajagwnoua 6uiaq of joafgns jo 'Alpejunlonui jo Alijejunlon `algeuaile aq It llegs jou
`uoilnoaxe jo juawgsiujeb 'Iuaujgoe:4e 01 joafgns aq Ii Reqs jou ',Ijadojd ajnjijsuoo
IOU Ileus asuaoilaqj •jajdeg) sigj ui gjjoj IGS se pa�anW jauaos ssalun 'aouenssi
ja4e jeaA auo paaoxa 01 IOU JOJ poofi 'abalinijd leuosjad a Alajnd aq llegs asuaoil* 'b
.9sueol-110 Jajsueal '£ WC � 'Des
.Mel
Aq papinojd se pjooaj IMWO pa9iIja0 aqI uo jauo1ss1wwO0 lojluoo jonbij
leoo-I 94110 uoijoe ja japjo aqj jo Ajapdojd aqj Mainaj Reqs uoissiWWOO
a e agl sBuipaaoojd aqj jo pjooaj Iepgo papiao agj uaissiWwoo jonbi-1
mels siouilll aqI qI!m 914 Reqs jauoisslwwoo lojluoo janbi-1 leoo l aql 'leaddie
ue 10 aoiJau saniaoW jauoIsSIWWOO lojluoo jonbi-1 leoaj aqj se awil gons IV 'Z
`jaua1ss1ujuuo0
10JIU03 jonbi-1 leoo-I aqj 10 sbuipaaoojd aqj jo pjooaj leiogo pagpigo
aqj ui punol aouapina aqj aq Reqs uoissiwwoo ajejS pies Aq Mainaj aql ui
pajapisuao aq llegs goigM aouapina Aluo aqj jaua1ss1wwO0 lojluoo jonbq
the number of licenses available in any or all classifications within the Village of Mount
Prospect If the number of licenses in any or all classifications are decreased, the licenses
may be eliminated on the basis of seniority, so that the premises holding a license the least
amount of time shall be eliminated first. However, the Local Liquor Control Commissioner
may, with an accompanying written statement, eliminate licenses in those instances on the
basis of quality of operation of the premises, considering such matters as charges before
the Local Liquor Control Commissioner, the State Liquor Commission or other law
enforcement issues and/or on the basis of articulable benefit or lack of benefit to the
Village.
Sec. 13.115. Change of Location.
A retail liquor dealer's license shall permit the sale of alcoholic liquor only on the
premises described in the application and license. The location may be changed only
upon written permission issued by the Local Liquor Control Commissioner. A change of
location shall be within the sole discretion of the Local Liquor Control- Commissioner.
Additionally, the Local Liquor Control Commissioner may, in writing, grant permission to
holders of Park District Licenses to sell alcoholic beverages at more than one location.
Sec. 13.116. Consumption on Premises.
A. No liquor shall be sold, offered for sale, kept for sale, displayed or advertised for
sale or delivered to any person except at the location, place or premises described
in the liquor license.
B. It shall be unlawful for anyone not having a license which provides for consumption
on the premises where sold, to offer for sale, deliver or donate any alcoholic
beverage for consumption on the premises, or to permit the same to be consumed
on the premises where sold or donated.
1 The Local Liquor Control Commissioner, however, may grant a daily permit
to any General Package, Wine Only Package, or Wine and Beer Only
Package licensee under this Chapter, which permit shall authorize the
delivery, without charge, of alcoholic liquor by such licensee in small and
limited amounts for sampling purposes only in conjunction with sales
promotional efforts occurring on the licensed premises. Such a permit shall
include the following conditions and limitations:
a. The sampling shall be attended and supervised by a full-time
employee and only in a designated area on the licensed premises;
b. The actual amount of alcoholic liquor or wine sampled by an individual
may not exceed one ounce;
C. The sample shall be served in a single use container which shall be
disposed of following the sampling;
d. There shall be no advertising of the availability of "sampling" by
advertising materials visible outside the licensed premises; and
e. There shall be a permit fee of ten dollars ($10.00) per day for the
issuance of such permit.
2. It shall be unlawful to consume or permit the consumption of alcoholic
beverages in public restaurants, catering establishments or other places of
public gathering not having the appropriate liquor license.
3. It shall be unlawful for any licensee to sell and/or offer for sale at retail
alcoholic liquor in other than its original package, except for consumption on
the premises where sold.
Sec. 13.117. Restrictions on Premises.
A. No license shall be issued for the sale at retail of any alcoholic liquor within one
hundred feet (100) of any church, school, hospital, home for aged or indigent
persons or for veterans, their spouses or children or any military or naval station or
any undertaking establishment or mortuary. This prohibition shall not apply to
motels or hotels offering restaurant service, regularly organized clubs, restaurants,
food shops or other places where the sale of alcoholic liquors is not the principal
business, if the place of business was established for such other principal purpose
prior to March 18, 1975.
B. The display and sale of alcoholic liquor in its original package under a General
Package License in premises where any other commodities are sold or offered for
sale, shall be conducted only in a portion of the premises set aside or physically'
separated from that portion of the premises used in conjunction with the display or
sale of such other commodities. The sale of tobacco products is not subject to this
separation requirement.
C. Notwithstanding any provision of this Chapter 13 to the contrary, it shall be unlawful
for a General Package License or a Wine and Beer Only Package Licensee who
sells alcoholic liquor as a part of, but not as, its principal business to consummate
the sale of alcoholic liquor except at a counter with a cash register designated to be
used for sale of alcoholic liquor and which cash register is operated by a person of
at least nineteen (19) years of age. No more than two (2) cash registers may be
designated for the sale of alcoholic beverages and to the extent practicable shall be
separated from the remaining cash registers and checkout lines in the
establishment.
D Notwithstanding provisions of Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) or Section 9.115 of
Chapter 9 (Streets and Sidewalks) it shall be unlawful for any licensee to serve or
permit the consumption of alcoholic beverages in any outdoor area when any
portion of the area is located within three hundred feet (300) of any residential
zoning district in the Village of Mount Prospect.
Provided, however, that any licensee that commenced the conduct of business in
an outdoor area within three hundred feet (300') of a residential zoning district prior
to January 1, 1989, may continue to operate the outside service area according to
the following schedule: service of alcoholic liquor to any outdoor area of a licensed
premises shall be prohibited after nine thirty o'clock (9:30) p.m. and the outdoor
area must be closed and empty of patrons by ten o'clock (10:00) p.m.
Sec. 13.118. Closing Hours; Sunday Closing.
A. It shall be unlawful for any licensee holding a liquor license in a classification other
than General Package License, Park District License, Wine and Beer Only Package
License or Wine Only Package License to sell, offer for sale, or deliver any
alcoholic liquor in the Village or to permit any person to consume any alcoholic
liquor in or on any premises for which a license providing for consumption on the
premises has been issued pursuant to this Chapter 13, between the hours of one
o'clock (1:00 a.m. to eleven o'clock (11:00) a.m. on Monday through Friday
inclusive; between the hours of two o'clock (2:00) a.m. and eleven o'clock (11:00
a.m. on Saturday; between the hours of two o'clock (2:00) a.m. and twelve o'clock
(12:00) noon on Sunday; and on January 1 of each year said closing hours shall be
from four o'clock (4:00) a.m. to twelve o'clock (12:00) noon. If any persons other
than the licensee or the licensee's employees are on the premises after the
-17-
aforesaid hours and there are alcoholic beverages in any form or container other
than in the corked or re -closed place of display or storage, it shall be presumed that
a violation of this section has occurred. All unfinished drinks shall be cleared from
the bar within ten minutes after closing time.
B. It shall be unlawful for any licensee holding a Class General Package License, Wine
and Beer Only Package License or Wine Only Package liquor license to sell or offer
for sale any alcoholic liquor in the Village between the hours of one o'clock (1:00
a.m. to eight o'clock (8:00) a.m. on Monday through Friday inclusive; between the
hours of two o'clock (2:00) a.m. and eight o'clock (8:00 a.m. on Saturday; between
the hours of two o'clock (2:00) a.m. and twelve o'clock (12:00) noon on Sunday; and
on January 1 of each year said closing hours shall be from four o'clock (4:00) a.m.
to twelve o'clock (12:00) noon.
C. It shall be unlawful for any licensee holding a Park District License to sell or offer for
sale any alcoholic liquor at retail in the Village or to permit any person to consume
any alcoholic liquor in or on any premises for which a license providing for
consumption on the premises has been issued other than between eleven o'clock
(11:00) a.m, and ten o'clock (10:00) p.m. on Monday through Friday, inclusive;
between the hours of eleven o'clock (11:00) a.m. on Saturday and two o'clock (2:00)
a.m. on the following Sunday; and between the hours of twelve o'clock (12:00) noon
and ten o'clock (10:00) p.m. on Sunday.
D. It shall be unlawful for any premises for which a retail liquor dealer's license has
been issued pursuant to this Chapter to remain open for business or to admit or
permit to remain any persons other than employees on any licensed premises
during the hours within which the sale of liquor is prohibited. Retail establishments,
restaurants and clubs may be kept open during such hours, but no alcoholic liquor
may be sold, consumed by the public, or remain on tables or a bar during such
hours. Nothing contained in this Section shall be deemed to authorize any retail
establishment, restaurant or club to remain open for business or to admit the public
to the premises at or during any hour when that premises is required to be closed
by virtue of the regulations or restrictions imposed by any other provisions of this
Village Code.
Sec. 13.119. Peddling.
It shall be unlawful to peddle alcoholic liquor in the Village,
Sec. 13.120. Compliance with Building, Sanitary, Safety and Other
Regulations of the Village.
All premises used for the sale of alcoholic liquor, or for the storage of such liquor
for sale shall be kept in full compliance with all other regulations of the Village, including
but not limited to those relating to the storage or sale of food, sanitary conditions and
safety conditions.
Sec. 13.121. Entertainment.
No entertainment shall be permitted on any licensed premises if that entertainment
is audible at any point beyond the boundaries of the licensed premises. "Licensed
Premises", in this instance, shall not apply to a license issued pursuant to Section
13.107(0', so long as the licensee complies with all other conditions of the license and all
other regulations of the Village of Mount Prospect. Further, a licensee may apply, in
writing, to the Office of the Village Manager for permission to hold one event per year not
to exceed seventy-two (72) hours in duration when live music may be played outdoors on
the licensed premises. No such live music may be played between the hours of 11:00 p.m.
and 11:00 a.m. and the Village Manager may attach such other conditions to the permit as
-18-
may be advisable to protect the peace and quiet of the surrounding area. Further, the
Local Liquor Control Commissioner, the Village Manager or his designate of either, shall
have the absolute right, for cause and without the necessity of a hearing, to order the
immediate cessation of such live music.
Sec. 13.122. Prohibited Conduct.
The following kinds of conduct are prohibited on premises in this Village which are
licensed to sell alcoholic liquor:
A. The performance of acts, or simulated acts, of sexual intercourse, masturbation,
sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation or any sexual acts which are
prohibited by law.
B. The actual or simulated touching, caressing or fondling of the breasts, buttocks,
anus or genitals.
C. The actual or simulated display of the breasts, pubic hair, anus, vulva or genitals.
D. The permitting by a licensee of any person to remain in or upon the licensed
premises who exposes to public view any portion of his or her genitals or anus.
E. The displaying of films or pictures depicting acts, which if performed live are
prohibited by this Section.
Sec. 13.123. Fighting Prohibited; Licensees Conduct.
A. Fighting, by patrons, either inside a licensed premises or any place outside the
premises that is owned or leased by and used for the licensed premises or on any
public way adjacent to the licensed premises is prohibited. For the purpose of this
Section, fighting shall mean any threatening or touching of another person which
provokes or tends to provoke a breach of the peace. If self defense is offered as
a defense to a charge of fighting, that defense must be established by the
presentation of clear and convincing evidence. Any person violating this Section
shall be fined not less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250-00).
B. A summary of Section 13.123A shall be prominently displayed in letters not less
than one inch (1") high in all premises holding a Combination License, Tavern
License, Club License, Catering License, Food Court License, Park District License,
Supper Club License, Hotel License, Restaurant Only License, Restaurant with
Lounge License, Bowling Alley License or Restaurant, Wine and Beer Only
Licenses. The notice shall further state that any person in a licensed premises
observing a fight shall immediately notify the Village Police Department.
C. Each licensee shall maintain a peaceful and orderly business premises. This shall
be accomplished by establishing and maintaining the optimum precautions and
actions that are practical to deter and prevent fighting. This is referred to as the
maintenance of order standard. The duty to prevent fighting shall be applicable
both to precautionary and training matters and to the steps taken once a fight
breaks out or is in imminent danger of breaking out. If a fight does occur, the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner shall have the right to conduct a hearing to consider
the circumstances surrounding the fight and to determine the extent to which the
licensee failed to adhere to the "maintenance of order standard." At such a hearing,
the Local Liquor Control Commissioner may consider the following matters, among
others:
1. Prior incidents of reported or unreported fighting.
-19-
2. Whether any fight participant was intoxicated and the extent to which the
intoxication occurred on the premises.
3. Whether any participant was served by the licensee after the participant's
intoxication should have been evident to the licensee.
4. Whether any participant was intoxicated and whether the licensee had an
opportunity to affect that person's removal from the premises.
5. The degree of expediency the licensee observed in calling the police when
it should have been evident that a fight was imminent.
6. The actions of the licensee in reacting to the fight.
7. The extent and type of training given to the licensee's employees in such
matters as recognizing intoxication, overserving and prevention of
altercations.
8. Whether minors were involved in the fighting,
9. The sufficiency or number of persons on duty and employed by the licensee
at the time of the fight.
Considering all of the circumstances brought into evidence at the hearing, the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner shall make a determination of whether the licensee
violated the "Maintenance of order standard." If it is determined that a violation
occurred, the Local Liquor Control Commissioner may impose any penalty set forth
in Section 13.112 of this Chapter up to and including license revocation.
D. The following procedure shall be observed by a licensee with respect to fighting:
1. The licensee or the licensee's agent or employee on the premises shall notify
the Village Police Department immediately when the licensee knows or in the
exercise of ordinary judgment should know that a fight is occurring or
imminent.
2. In addition, within forty eight (48) hours of the occurrence, the licensee shall
file with the Village Liquor Control Commissioner a report on a form provided
by the Village containing the following information:
a. The number of the persons involved in the fight;
b. The approximate amount of alcohol consumed at the premises by
each person involved in the fight;
C. What action, if any, was taken by the licensee to prevent the fight;
d. What action, if any, was taken by the licensee subsequent to the start
of the fight;
e. The licensee's opinions as to why the fight occurred.
E. Failure by the licensee to give immediate notification to the Mount Prospect Police
Department of a fight on a licensed premises or failure to file a report as required
in Subsection (D) with the Liquor Control Commissioner shall subject the licensee
to a mandatory fine of $500 and a possible suspension or revocation of the Village
liquor license. For purposes of this Section the word "immediate" shall refer to such
time as one party threatens another or actually commences fighting with another.
F. The provisions of this Section 13.123 shall not generally apply in circumstances
where alcohol is used in an individual guest room within a hotel or where alcohol is
mixed and poured at the hotel bar but it is delivered to a separate banquet or
meeting room. This Section shall apply to any other delivery of alcohol at a hotel,
including but not limited to, delivery in the restaurant or lounge or in those cases
where a bar is set up in an area away from the main bar for the convenience of
banquet or meeting room guests.
Sec. 13.124. Dram Shop Insurance.
Every licensee shall be required to obtain and maintain Dram Shop insurance
coverage and every person who owns, rents, leases as lessor or permits the occupation
of any building or premises with knowledge that alcoholic liquors are to be sold there, or,
who leases the premises for other purposes but knowingly permits the sale of any alcoholic
liquors, shall be required to carry host liability insurance coverage for such facility. Each
shall carry coverage in an amount at least equal to the maximum insurance limits of
exposure set forth in the Illinois Compiled Statutes, 5/6-21 235.
Sec. 13.125. Conduct of Employees and Agents.
The following shall apply to employees and agents of licensees:
A. Any act or failure to act of an employee of either the licensee or a management
company with respect to the licensed business shall be deemed to be the act of the
licensee.
B. No employee or other deliverer of alcohol may consume or be permitted to consume
any alcoholic liquor on the licensed premises while on duty or while per -forming any
duties of employment.
C. No person, including any employee, manager, owner or agent of the licensee may
consume alcoholic liquor on the licensed premises before or after the permitted
hours of operation.
Sec. 13.126. Sale to Intoxicated Persons; Habitual Drunkards, Others.
It shall be unlawful for any licensee to sell, deliver or give any alcoholic liquor to any
of the following:
1. An intoxicated person;
2. A person known to the purveyor to have been involved previously in a fight
in the establishment.
Sec. 13.127. Prohibited Sale or Promotion of Alcoholic Beverages.
A. All licensees selling alcoholic beverages to be served and consumed on the
licensed premises are prohibited from engaging in any of the following practices:
Delivery of more than two (2) drinks to one person at a time even if the drinks
are purportedly purchased for more than one individual.
2. Sale, offer or delivery to any person, an unlimited number of drinks during
any set period of time for a fixed price, except at private functions not open
to the public. (2 for 1 Nights)
3. Sale, offer or delivery of drinks to any person -or group of persons during any
period of a day at prices less than those charged to the general public during
the rest of the same calendar day except at private functions not open to the
public. (Happy Hours)
4. In -creasing the volume of alcoholic liquor contained in a drink without
increasing proportionately the price otherwise charged for such a drink
during the same calendar week.
5. Encouraging or permitting any game or contest which involves drinking *or the
awarding of drinks as prizes on the licensed premises.
No licensee shall advertise or promote in any way, whether within or without the
licensed premises, any of the practices prohibited under this Section.
B. The prohibition contained in this Section shall not prevent liquor licensees from:
1. Offering free food or entertainment at any time.
2. Including a drink as part of a meal package.
I Free wine tasting as permitted by Subsection 13.116(B)l.
4. Offering room service to registered guests in hotels licensed for such
services.
Sec. 13.128. Prohibited Sale of Refrigerated Alcoholic Liquor in Single
Containers.
Any licensee holding a Combination License, General Package License, Wine and
Beer Only Package License, or Wine Only Package License shall be prohibited from selling
or offering for sale single containers of refrigerated or chilled alcoholic liquor for
consumption on the premises where sold, where the single container has a capacity of less
than seven hundred fifty milliliters.
Sec. 13.129. Regulations with Respect to Underage Persons.
Nothing in this Section shall prohibit any persons under the age of twenty one (21)
years but at least nineteen (1 g) years of age from delivering alcohol to customers.
However, no person under 21 years of age may sell or otherwise deliver alcohol from
behind a bar, mix any drink, or pour any drink other than beer or wine for patrons who are
seated at a table,
A. It shall be unlawful for any holder of a retail liquor dealer's license to allow any
person under the age of twenty one (21) years to:
1. Be seated at a bar; or
2. Remain in or be seated in the lounge unless accompanied by a parent. This
subparagraph (2) shall apply only to those lounges where the seating at
tables with the full service of the establishment's food menu is not available.
B. It shall be unlawful for any person to whom the sale, gift or delivery of any alcoholic
liquor is prohibited because of age to consume, purchase, accept a gift of or have
such alcoholic liquor in his or her possession. The prohibitions set forth in this
subsection (B) shall not apply in the circumstances described in Section
13.130(C)(1) and (2).
C. If a licensee, in the exercise of ordinary judgment, should have reason to believe
that a sale or delivery of any alcoholic liquor is prohibited because of the age of the
prospective recipient, the licensee shall, before making such sale or delivery,
demand presentation of a form of positive identification, containing proof of age,
issued by a public officer in the performance of his or her official duties. (See
Section 13.131)*
SME
D. No person shall transfer, alter or deface any identification card; use any
identification card of another; carry or use a false or forged identification card; obtain
an identification card by means of false information; or otherwise misrepresent age
for the purpose of purchasing or obtaining alcoholic liquor in the Village of Mount
Prospect. (See Section 13.131)
In every place in the Village where alcoholic liquor is sold there shall be displayed
at all times in a prominent place a printed card which reads substantially as follows:
If you are under 21, you are subject to a mandatory fine of $500.00 if
you purchase any alcoholic liquor. If you misrepresent your age for the
purpose of purchasing or obtaining any alcoholic liquor, you will also
be subject to restricted driving privileges within the Village of Mount
Prospect. If you buy for or deliver an alcoholic beverage to an
underage person, you will be subject to a mandatory fine of $1,000.00.
Sec. 13.130. Consequences of Facilitating the Use of Alcoholic Beverages by
Underage Persons.
A. Qeliva f Alcoholic, Bevergae, o an UnderagePersoLl. It shall be unlawful for any
I W -R..
person, regardless of relationship, age or circumstances, to deliver any alcoholic
beverage to any underage person, except as set forth in Subsection (C).
B. Us -e of P remits nor Coni um of g,nAlcob,olig Beveragg., It shall be unlawful for
any person to knowingly permit or to knowingly or negligently fail to prevent, on
premises under his or her control, the consumption of an alcoholic beverage by an
underage person. This Section shall apply to residential, public and commercial
premises.
C.ax_ceptions,. Subsections (A) and (13) of this Section shall not apply in the following
circumstances:
1. The performance of a bona fide religious service.
2. The delivery of an alcoholic beverage within the home to an underage
person, by and under the direct supervision of that underage persons'
parent. However, the following rules shall be applied to this Subsection (C)2:
a. In any prosecution of an underage person for the commission of any
State or local offense, the prosecutor, upon reasonable grounds, may
request a ruling and the court shall rule as to whether the
consumption of an alcoholic beverage, as permitted by the parent,
was a contributing factor to the commission of the offense. If it is so
determined in the affirmative, then the penalty set forth in Subsection
A of this Section shall apply. For purposes of this Subsection, the
consumption of alcohol may be determined to be a contributing factor
if it had the effect of substantially causing an impairment to the person
as impairment is defined in this Chapter. It need not be shown that,
but for the consumption of alcohol, the offense would not have been
committed.
b. The parent shall remain vicariously liable as set forth in Subsection
(E) of this Section.
D. Penaltv., Any person found guilty of violating Subsection (A) or (B) of this Section
shall be fined in the mandatory amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).
E. Viggrious L,i,a,bJ,,[it gf,, "arent gr er EgLsonl Fac-ilitating the lJsg,,,,gir,Abuse . .. ....
aE 01b-
Alcpbolic Beverag The following persons shall be liable to any individual who
11 es
has been injured by an alcohol impaired underage person when the impairment is
a contributing cause of the injury:
1. Any person who delivered or permitted the delivery of an alcoholic beverage
to the underage person. The person making or permitting the initial delivery
to an underage person remains liable to anyone injured by the same or
different underage person regardless of how many times the alcoholic
beverage changed hands.
2. Any person in control of a premises, who knowingly or negligently fails to
maintain supervision to such an extent that an alcoholic beverage is
consumed on the premises by an underage person.
Any person who knowingly or negligently allows the operation of a motor
vehicle under his or her control by an underage person, when the person
knew or in the exercise of ordinary judgment should have known that the
underage person was either impaired or had consumed any amount of
alcohol within two (2) hours prior to when the allowance to drive occurred.
The vicarious liability established by this Section shall not be subject to the
limitations on damages as set forth in 235 Illinois Compiled Statutes 5/6-21.
Sec. 13.131. Use of False Identification.
Any underage person found guilty of attempting to obtain delivery of an alcoholic
beverage by use of false proof of age shall be subject to a mandatory fine of five hundred
dollars ($500.00). If the false proof of age was an improperly used driver's license, the
person so using it shall not be permitted, for a period of six (6) months, to operate a motor
vehicle within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect unless accompanied by
a licensed driver over thirty years of age. (See Section 13.135).
Sec. 13.132. False Identification not a Defense.
It shall not be a defense to any action brought criminally, civilly or administratively
against any liquor licensee or any other person charged with the delivery of any alcoholic
beverage to an underage person that such a person produced false identification or proof
of age. The person or persons hearing and deciding the charges may consider such a
claim when determining the penalty to be assessed or the apportionment of damages.
Sec. 13.133. Operation of a Motor Vehicle While in a State of Impairment.
It shall be unlawful for any underage person to operate a motor vehicle on a street
or highway of the Village while in a state of impairment due to the consumption of an
alcoholic beverage or with any alcohol at all in his or her system. For purposes of this
Section only, operation of a motor vehicle shall have the definition ascribed to it in the
Illinois Vehicle Code rather than the definition set forth in Section 13.101 of this Chapter.
Sec. 13.134. Operation of a Motor Vehicle by Underage Persons with an
Alcoholic Beverage in or on the Vehicle; When the Underage
Person is Impaired Due to Alcohol or has Alcohol in the system
or is Operating the Vehicle in Violation of a Restriction Pursuant
to this Chapter.
The following shall apply when any underage person is found in the Village,
operating any motor vehicle in which or on which is found any alcoholic beverage, or when
-24-
the underage person is in a state of impairment due to consumption of alcohol or to have
alcohol in the system or is found operating a motor vehicle in violation of a restriction
pursuant to this Chapter:
A. The motor vehicle shall be subject, to immediate impoundment by the 'Police
Department.
B. The following factors shall not be considerations in determining whether or not to
impound the motor vehicle:
1. Whether the alcoholic beverage is in an opened or an unopened container.
2. Whether the operator is the owner of the alcoholic beverage in the vehicle.
3. Whether the operator had knowledge of the existence of the alcoholic
beverage within the motor vehicle.
C. Upon impoundment, the motor vehicle may be released only to another person
showing proof of ownership or lease rights to the motor vehicle.
1 If the underage operator is the owner or lessor of the vehicle, then the
vehicle may be released only to a parent or spouse of the underage owner.
If the underage person has no parent or spouse living in the immediate area,
the vehicle may be released, upon satisfactory proof of such fact, as set forth
in Subsection (D).
D. The motor vehicle may not be released to any person who was a passenger in the
motor vehicle at the time the alcoholic beverage or impairment was found unless at
least twenty four (24) hours have passed from the time of the finding.
E. The vehicle shall not be released until the person seeking the release has paid Two
Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) to reimburse the Police Department for its
administrative costs plus any storage fees.
F. If the operator is subsequently found guilty of driving with open alcohol in a motor
vehicle or possession of alcohol by a minor or of operating a motor vehicle while
impaired pursuant to Section 13.133 of this Chapter, that person shall not be
permitted for a period of six (6) months to operate a motor vehicle on any public way
within the limits of the Village of Mount Prospect unless accompanied by a licensed
driver over thirty years of age.
G. The above obligations and penalties shall be in addition to the penalties that may
be assessed in a court of law for any charges incident to the stop.
H. Any law enforcement officer, the Police Department and the Village and any of its
officers or agents shall be absolutely immune from any liability or exposure to
liability of any kind or nature for the enforcement or implementation of this Section.
Sec. 13.135. Procedure for Driving Restriction Notification; Hearing.
A. If a person has committed a violation that subjects the person to a restriction on
driving in Mount Prospect, such a restriction shall not take place until the Village of
Mount Prospect Police Department has sent, by regular mail, a notice of the
pending driving restriction. The notice shall be mailed at least two (2) weeks before
the restriction is to go into effect and shall contain (a) a statement that the restriction
applies only to the Village of Mount Prospect; (b) the date the restriction is to go into
effect and the date on which it ends; (c) a map showing the Mount Prospect Village
limits; (d) a notice that the operator has the right to request a hearing within ten (10)
days of notification to determine the validity of the restriction. The validity of the
restriction may be challenged only on the grounds that the person was not the
-25..
actual person found guilty or that there was no finding of guilty for the underlying
offense.
B. The hearing shall be conducted by a supervisory member of the Village of Mount
Prospect Police Department, appointed by the Chief of Police and 'whose
determination shall be final.
Sec. 13.136. Penalty for Violating Driving Restriction.
A. Restriction. No person shall operate and no person, including a parent, shall permit
another to operate a motor vehicle within the corporate limits of the Village Jn
violation of the restrictions set forth in Sections 13.130 or 13.134(F).
B. Penalty. Any person found guilty of violating this Section shall be fined in thei
mandatory amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00).
Sec. 13.137. Penalties; General.
Unless another penalty is set forth in this Chapter, every person found guilty of a
violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to a fine of not less
than one hundred dollars ($100.00), nor more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) for
each offense. A separate offense shall be deemed to have been committed on each
day during or on which a violation occurs or continues. Any fines set forth in this
Chapter shall be assessed regardless of whether the violator is convicted or placed on
supervision by the court. If the court is of the opinion that the ends of justice would be
better served by requiring community service of the violator or a combination of a fine
and community service, the fine may be mitigated at a rate of one hour of community
service for every ten dollars ($10.00) of the mandatory fine. Fines assessed by the
court against any offender may be in addition to any penalty assessed against a
licensee in any administrative proceeding.
SECT! 2- That all Ordinance of parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed.
SEC TIQN 2That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST,
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
14 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO; MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, JIL, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: JULY 269 1994
SUBJECT: ZBA-31-CU-94, ZBA-32-V-94, SMART SMR OF ]ILLINOIS
LOCATION: 101 EAST RAND ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request
for a Conditional Use for 101 East Rand Road. Specifically, the petitioners are seeking to construct
a 120 foot ground -mounted antenna tower with an accessory structure.
The request was reviewed at the special Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of July 14, 1994. At the
meeting Mr. Darrell Daugherty presented the request. Mr. Daugherty indicated that the previously
requested variations have been deleted and all setbacks will be met. Mr. Daugherty summarized the
cellular/digital phone technology and gave a brief history of Nextel and its goals. He indicated that
the Mount Prospect location is vital to their network in the Chicago area and that this tower is a relay
station to seven other towers.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report. He indicated that staff has been working with
the petitioners for several months on finding a location. He indicated that the petitioners have
modified the monopol tower design to mitigate it's visual impact. However, staff is opposed to the
proposed height of the tower and recommends that it be reduced to 70 feet.
The Zoning Board of Appeals held a lengthy discussion on the request. Mr. Lannon disqualified
himself from the vote as he owns stock in Nextel. By a vote of 3-1 the Zoning Board of Appeals
approved the request, however, a minimum of four votes is needed for a positive recommendation.
Ly 9, 0 141 7�1
KNX
SITE No. I a 913 1
WHEELING
a R 0 u P p"C6807 MAN&
aglow 101 E. RAND ROAD
i:-' Lo"rm
I - pill W
94131 1 DAM /r' —
-22
04 mo. i cw 2
46
KNX
SITE No. I a 913 1
WHEELING
a R 0 u P p"C6807 MAN&
aglow 101 E. RAND ROAD
i:-' Lo"rm
I - pill W
94131 1 DAM /r' —
-22
04 mo. i cw 2
Fo
P—
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-3I-CU-94, ZBA-32-V 94 Hearing Date: July 14, 1994
PETITIONER: Darrel Daugherty
SMR of Illinois
1051 Perimeter Drive
Schaumburg, IL
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 101 East Rand Road
PUBLICATION DATE: Published In the Norftmot Herald on June 28, 1994
REQUEST: The petitioners are reqLw, Wng the'
fokming in order to construct a radio
tower•with an accessory b t:
1. A Conditional Use ash, in
Section 14.1703.20 to slow a grourKl-
mounted antenna tower whichexceods
70 feet in heigilk
2. A variation to Section 14.306.4 to
allow an accessory structure with Baa 9
foot separation from the pd, ncipal,a e
instead of iheminbn= required 10 %* and
3. A variation to Section 14.306.02 to slow
an accessory struchze with a rear yard set-
back of 4 feet and an accessoiry stu chwo with
a side yard setback of 2 feet Instead of the
i�
minimum r 6 feet.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ronald Cassidy, We Chairman
Peter Lannon
Jack Verhasse6
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
ASSENT: Gilbert Basnik
Robert Brettra+ger
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Vice Chairman, Cassidy introduced the case ZBA-3I-CU-94, SBA -32-V-94, reques&V the following in
order to consinid a radio tower with an accessory binding: 1. A Conddonal Use as required in Section
14.1703.20 to alow a ground -mounted antenna tower which exceeds 70 feet in height 2. A variation to
Section 14.306.4 taxa a an accessory structure with a 9 foot separation from the priraacipal struc h"
instead of the mntifr m required 10 feet and 3. A variation to Section 14.306.0.2 to allow an accessory
structure with a rear yard setback of 4 feet and an accessory strucbxe with a side yard setback to 2 feet
instead of the minimum required 6 feet.
Darrel Daugherty, SMR of Illinois, wholly owned subsidiary of Nextel Comm1051 Perimeter,
Drive, Schaumburg, IL introduced himself and noted Mr. Jahn McMillan, PAL, architect and Mr. Randy
Stephenson, landlord's representative were also present.
Mr. Daugherty noted that their application would be amended. They are eliminating the request for the
separation between an accessory structure and a principal structure. in add"fon, ft rear yard thank
has been increased from 4 feet to 5 feet. They are also requesting the 2 foot setback on the side setback
due to the overhang of the antennas.
Mr. Daugherty o i EBMR stands for Enhanced Specialized MobOe Radio., SMR licenses operate In the
same 800 megaburts frequency bands as do Cellular, etc., SMR has been around for several years. What
N is doing. is taking existing spetislized mobile radio tequen ., and, applying, Motorola d1' `
technology rn. NexW Is a national c8nier. He explained, by several
Inclutfing Motorola and MCI. He explained how, and where the system operates now, and in tw 6Are.
They are asking for a 120 foot communicationstower which, is theh le. He ed
e of to at e d d said the some � of tower is, presently existing at ft Glenview,
Municipal facility. It is a o irnateiy I00 feet. The aar to a willbe painted a softwtde color. They we
also requesting a 20O re foot prefabricated equipment mom where the � radio em
stored. No o ,
Pe rsonnel are required for the site. Peri ma ce oconce or twice a
month.
Mr. Cassidy asked to what advantage would this project be to the V1111age of Mount Prospect. Mr.
DauOerty, explained. e responded, ommu< < are exp
nation and the wodd. T he FCC lot in 19,93 came up, with a policy m, It wanted, to add up too
but not Imited to fcKr to sic new carriers of wireless communications in each geographical market.
Currently #we two, and we can expect,to see a.. d < < of two to fow more in ft corning years.
respect, to ft public service element,
hie tell is seeing a re in price, levels in loos ArVeles, due to
kweased competition. Ser&e costs in Los -e 25 per cent lower, tan some of dw competitors
and as a result, the competitors are decreasing twk-prkAw By addkV, more competition,, We will no to
price of the servicers fall. Aho, if you look at the peging example, the p6ces are much lower thaneve
years ago. Tho broadcastareas were ct VW it will, give Moutt Prospect
seamless cm, M(890-
Vice Chairman Cassidy asked why they need the Rand Road location. Mr. Daughetty explained it b a
to mics! reasm. They are sent in a very, specific, geographical koition m tteira
engineetingdapartment. The departrnen lstatn#Wth� wo Ike Wotan * ormquarter
mile type radius in a certain area to maximize the efficiency of the system. He referred toa maw depicting
the, requested location and noted it is ^ all for the system to be kxated in Mount
Mr. Verhasseft mentioned use by the cab companies, buck fleets, etc Mr. Daugherty said that would be
one aspect o(the service, but it is consumer related. There will be various types of applications. With the
digitai system, the applications are endless. This system is digital from the ground up. It is state of the art
Motorola equipment and handsets. It is considered the next generation of wireless communication.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals and concluded
that staff would recommend denial of the proposal based on concerns of the Planning Department and of
other Village Departments.
Mr. Lannon asked what is the height of the water tower at Randhu st. Ray Forsythe replied that it is about
100 feet. Ra is in the process of designing the elmination of the water tower. 'there was
d' , a . selettim process.. The present site , best location*"lab*.
Mr. Verna ed if 120 tower to, the r i area, is an eye sore con cern, or is It e
radio wave communication problem. Mr. Forsythe said staff is satisfied that the ractio waves there will not
be any 41Wuption of any household type utilities; it is more the aesthetics of the 120 foot tower that is a
concern.
Ms. Luxem asked how dose the nearest residential area is. Mr. Forsythe replied it is wd* 250 feet of the
south, a multikfamily development.
Mr. Cassidy questioned e height variation. Mr. Daugherty said they have worked, for many monft to
donne up with, a plan end elaborated on how, their plan compares to other communities, kwWsng
Glenview, and the distance from single family residential areas where towers are located. He also
described the height. There was discussion about the type of tower to be used and the various locations
where their towers are already located. He discussed the public understanding and need for this service.
Afteriscussion it was decided there was no conflict with or interference from other towers. In any case
where petitioner be in close proidmity, they would coordinate with them and provide filtering of each
other's frequencies. They operate on different frequencies and channels. The SEC coordinates all of the
issuance and assignment of frequencies to be sure there is no potential for interference. These antennas
are finely tuned to avoid household interference. A technician would be available to anyone calling with
any problem. The maintenance of the structure was discussed. However, there is virtually no -
maintenance mpected. There Is no lighting required. There was discussion about the future use,,
including emergency and medical uses and eAsting towers owned by petitioner. The map suppled by
petitioner was discussed. Fence height and location were discussed.
Mr. Lannon dhWakfied himself from the case because of stock ownership In Nexel.
Mr. Cassidy said petitioner agreed that he would withdraw the variations for setbacks. The only request Is
for the 120 foot tower.
Mr. Cassidy indicated that the request is for a Conditional Use as required in Secdon 14.1703.20 to slow
a ground -mounted antenna to stand 120 feet high, and no variations are needed because petitioner has
amended the request. The structure will be painted a soft white.
Mr. Verhasselt moved and Ms. Luxem seconded the motion to approve.
Upon Rol Cal: AYES: Verhasselt, Luxem, Cassidy
NAYS: Florm
The motion was approved by a vote of 3-1. However, aminlmum of 4 votes are needed for a posWe
recommendation. The Village Board wN need a au;w majority to approve the request.
Respecduly submitted,
F
Ray F e, Planner
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
G11L BASNI1,K9 CHAIRMAN
tl
FROM*
RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER
DATE:
JUNE 239 1994
CASE NO.:
ZBA-31-CU-949 ZBA-32-V-94
APPLICANT:
SMART SMR OF ILLINOIS
ADDRESS:
1,01 EAST RAND ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-31 COMMUNITY SHOPPING
LOT SIZE: 331,992 Sq. Ft.
%COVERAGE: N/A
Gil Basnik,, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
to-
Page 2
The petitioners are requesting the following in order to construct a radio tower with an accessory
building:
1. A Conditional Use, as required in Section 14.1703.20, to allow a ground -mounted
antenna tower which exceeds 70 feet in height.
2. A variation to Section 14.306.4 to allow an accessory structure with a 9 foot
separation from the principal structure instead of the minimum required 10 feet; and
3. A variation to Section 14.306.0.2 to allow an accessory structure with a rear yard
setback of 4 feet and an accessory structure with a sideyard setback of 2 feet instead
of the minimum required 6 feet.
Summary of Application: The application indicates the desire to construct and operate a wirelen
communications facility. The project consists of a 200 square foot radio equipment shelter and a 121D
foot tall monopole antenna. The application also indicates the 120 foot height is necessary to meet
specific coverage objectives.
Impact on Surrounding Properties:
Site History
In 1978, the property owner was granted a Special Use Permit to operate an auto garage, service
station and the tire center.
In 1981, the property owner amended the Special Use Permit to allow more than one principal use
on the property. The additional uses include an auto parts store, an auto repair shop and the service
station.
The petitioners, are now seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 120 foot tan
monopole tower. The proposal would also include a 10'x 20' equipment room, an 8 foot concrete
block wall along the rear and side of the area and a 7 foot wrought iron fence along the front. The
proposal would be located to the rear of the existing one-story masonry building.
The Zoning Ordinance allows towers which exceed 70 feet only with,, a, Conditiona' Use Permit. The
variations are required in, order to, permit the building and tower to be located Within the required
setbacks.
Staff would note that the property owner also owns the adjacent vacant property to the west. He
could eliminate the need for the requested variations by adjusting the lot line between the two
properties.
u'u"Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
The petitioners are proposing a 120 foot high tower which will be used for a digital communications
system. The only antenna structure in Mount Prospect that exceeds the requested height is the 250
foot tall TCI type tower on their property in the Kensington Center. There are no towers which are
similar to that which is requested. There are structures which are 120 feet or higher (water towers,
Commonwealth Edison power lines). The First Chicago Bank and 1699 Wall Street buildings are
both approximately 100 feet in height.
The petitioners have modified the design of their tower in order to make less of an impact. The
antenna is designed to look like a typical fight pole and shields have been proposed to screen the nine
panel antenna. Although the petitioner has attempted to mitigate the impact of this structure, staff
does not feel that 120 foot antenna is appropriate in such close proximity to a residential area.
Variations
The site plan indicates that the tower and accessory building will, be located to the rear of the existing
building. The area will be enclosed by a wrought iron fence 7 feet high along the front of the
building. An 8 foot concrete block wall similar to the existing building will be constructed along the
side and rear of the site. The Zoning Ordinance allows 8 foot fences to screen storage areas. Staff
would also note that there is a 7 foot high chain link fence with barbed wire indicated inside the
storage area near the tower. The Zoning Ordinance requires that all barbed wire used for security
reasons be approved by the Village Board. The petitioners should be prepared to discuss the
necessity of the barbed wire at the Village Board meeting.
The variations are necessary in order to allow the prefab building and tower to be located within the
required setbacks. Because the property owner also owns the parcel to the west, a lot fine adjustment
is possible. Staff would recommend denial of the variations and would suggest the property owner
adjust the lot line between his two properties to bring the request within Code requirements.
Engineering indicated that any access easement should be recorded prior to the completion of the
project. Also, drainage within the storage area will need to be addressed with permits, Public Works
indicates that there is a watermain in the easement along the south property fine and care should be
1V
given when i 11:1%ig the fence. Inspection Services *indicates that foundation plans for the concrete
block wall and the tower will be required and must be signed and sealed by a structural engineer.
The petitioners are requesting a Conditional Use Permit with variations in order to construct and
operate a 120 foot radio tower and accessory building. Staff would recommend that the petitioner
reduce the height of the tower to 70 feet to meet Village Code requirements. In addition, it is
recommended that the owner adjust the lot fine between his two properties to eliminate the need for
setback variations.
M&W7.1
Nextel Communications
1051 Perimeter Dr., Suite 300, Schaumburg, IL 60173
708 517-5900 FAX 708 51 7-591 0
'MV
August 8, 199,,
S13-1
Mayor Gerald Farley
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson St.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Nextel SUP - Requested Waiving of First Reading
Mayor Farley,
CAU G il) 1994
, � - .0 __
At its last meeting, the Village Board approved Nextel Communications' Special Use
Permit application at 101 E. Rand Road. I understand that the resolution of approval
must have both a first and second reading which would require two additional Board
meetings, August 16 and September 6 respectively.
As I stated at the August 2 meeting, the proposed site provides critical "hand-offs" to
eight surrounding sites and is scheduled to be on -air by early Fall 1994. In order to
meet this schedule Nextel would hope to commence construction at its earliest
opportunity. Our building permit drawings and application will be submitted on
Wednesday, August 10.
At your discretion, I would ask that the Village Board consider waiving the first reading
and approving the second reading at its August 16 meeting. This would allow
construction to begin three weeks earlier than now expected. Any assistance you
could ould provide in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Please call me should you
have any questions or comments.
SMART SMR OF ILLINOIS
d/b/a Nextel Communications
Darrell W. Daugherty
Project Manager
cc: file
1DWDJmn
CAR
8/8/94
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY
PENERALLYLOCATEDAT 101 EAST RANDRQAD
WHEREAS, Smart SMR of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition
for a Conditional Use with respect to property generally located at 101 East Rand Road;
and legally described as follows:
All of Lot 1 and Lot 2 (except the west 140 feet thereof) in N. J. Funk's
Subdivision of the south 150.09 feet of the north 511.60 feet of that part of
the northwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 lying west of the centerline of Rand
Road of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use to permit a ground -mounted antenna
tower one hundred twenty feet (120) in height; and
WHEREAS, a public, hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use, being the
subject of RBA 31 -CU -94, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 14th day of July, 1994, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 28th day of June, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being
the -subject of ZBA 31 -C U-94; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be
in the best interest of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact
by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
gjECTIONTWO.: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Conditional Use to the subject property to permit a ground -mounted
antenna tower one hundred twenty feet (120) in height, which tower shall be a soft white
in color.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
U046".3
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois -
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, JR., DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: AUGUST 9, 1994
SUBJECT: MEIER ROAD FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION
210 AND 230 M[EIIER ROAD AND 2100 WHITE OAK STREET
The applicant, Gettysburg Development Corporation, is seeking approval of a nine lot single family
subdivision on the west side of Meier Road, between White Oak Street and the Moorings
Development in Arlington Heights.
The Plan Commission met in regular session on May 11, 1994 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval
of the Meier 'Road preliminary plat of subdivision, which would create nine new lots on Meier Road
and would allow Meier Road to extend through to Central. The preliminary plat was forwarded to
the Village Board who recommended that the final subdivision plat create a cul-de-sac bulb and
terminate Meier Road south of the Moorings. The cul-de-sac bulb requires the approval of three
Development Code modifications as well as the vacation of road right-of-way to create part of Lot
9. The Development Code modifications are required for the lot depths of Lots 7, 8 and 9 and for
a 110 foot road right-of-way cul-de-sac bulb. Section 16.403. C.2. e requires that the minimum depth
of any residential lot shall be 120 feet and Section 16.403. A. 5. b requires the cul-de-sac bulb to have
a minimum right-of-way diameter of 120 feet.
The Plan Commission met in regular session on Wednesday, August 31 1994 and voted 7-0 in favor
of recommending the approval of these modifications, the vacation of approximately 2,400 square
feet of road right-of-way at the north end of the development, and the approval of the Meier Road
final plat of subdivision.
WJC:hg
MEJER ROAD IS
UBDIVIS10A
Hh"'M(; A SUBDIVISION INTHE MONTIMEST 114 OFSECTION10, TOWNSHIP 41 M01011
EAS OF THE THIRD P
.4L A4ERrDj,4,N, IN'COOK COUN7T, JU, jjv(
e-NUAN PINE or rNE sf �,,2 or rmF NW Y4 OF sfC /o. 41- (1
dh
ALSO ,g'* Ar JIM/r$ OT TNF WIZAI(yE. Or mr
165,25 ser - am -w
MA4
T�\f FA1,LIMENF FOR
OAK lf,Zlj r I
7 165,27
W;l� �Ilvr mr PYHP11 /)Ak
A %J1 -w It) 1ef ' l pvf (7f &r Y4 or jIr y4 (7f MW* OwVr /0 41 11
Z
OIL
6K
MENUTJ._�J'S OF THE R_iJGULAR 'P,,'JZ__2_-JTING OF THE
MGUNT PROSPECT PLAN COM 14ISSI ON
August 3, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to
orderby Chairman Weibel at 8:00 PM at Village Halls 100 South Emerson
Street, Mount Prospects Illinois.
ROLL CALL
"Present at Roll - Call: Frank Boege Louis Velasco
Thomas McGovern Angela Volpe
Mardi all Ponzi Donald '4eibel, Chairman
Carol Tortorello,
Absent: Edwin Janus
+ Village Staff Present: Michael Sims9 Planner
Press Present: Peter Dujardins Daily Herald
Others Present: Larry McKone
Patrick McCloskey
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion was made by Mr. Boege, with a second by Mr. Velasco, to .approve
the minutes of July 6. 1994 as presented. Motion carried 5-2 Pass.
SUBDIVISIONS
Meier Road Final Plat of Subdivision - The Plan Commission voted 7-0 oil
May 119 1994 to recommend approval of the Meier Road preliminary plat of
subdivision., The Village Board then asked Gettysburg Development to
create a new subdivision plat that would terminate Meier Road south of
the Moorings and create a cul-de-sac. Current approval of this new sub-
division plat will require two Development Code modifications,* These are
for lot depth for the property lines between lots 7 and 8 and the east
property line of lot 9, as well as approval of a 110 foot cul-de-sac bulb.
Mr. Sims introduced Mr. McKone President of Gettysburg Development and
explained the hardship caused ty designing lots 7. 8 and 9 around the cul-
de-sac. All lots meet minimum square footage for R-1 lots but the sideyard
between lots 7 and 8 is 101,95 feet, and the east si.deyard of lot 9 is 106,750
Development code states 120 foot depth. Cul -de --sacs should have d bulb of
120 feet but in trying to achieve the best design for lots and streets; he
is asking for a 110 foot bulb diameter. Staff has no objections to these
requests,* Mr. 'McKone is also asking Mount Prospect to vacate approximately
2400 square feet of road right of way at the north end which will become
part of lot 9. This ROW is no longer needed and has no utilities within
its boundaries..
After some discussion votes were taken to approve Development Code modifi-
cations on the depth of lot lines, between 7 and 8 and the 1.ewt side of- 9..
Motion by Mrs. Volpe, second by Mr. Boege., Passed 7-0..
A motion was then made by Mr. Ponzi to approve -the 110 foot cul-de-sac bulb
with a second by Mrs. Volpe. Mot -ton passed 7-0.
A motion was made by Mr. McGovern to approve vacation of road right of way
of 33 feet on the east side of lot 9. Second was made by Mr. Boege and
motion passed 7-0o
A motion to approve the final plat of subdivision at 210 and 230 Meier Road
and 2100 -,,-,,jhite Oak Street was made by Mr. Velasco with a second by Mro Ponzie
Motion passed 7-0o
U 1
C_� 199L Page 2
P L LN Cl �1 I O
I N M I 11'U 'L -11JZ) - A` 9 U S t 7' f I a
i 0
"Ir Patrick McCloskey of Audrely Lane thanked the Commission for our hello
V
in effectively terminating 11,11eier Road. Mr. McGovern then noted that the
iludrey Lane resid.tints who, %!i'ould benefit from, the vacation of Meier Road
behind their properties should have these parcels recorded by the end of
1994 because of the 1995 re--assessments. , This issue Will now go before
the Village Board on 8-16-94 where there will be a public hearing.
The Anast Resubdivision will be discussed at a later meeting.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community. Development No report
B., Comprehensive Plan Mr., Sims states this update will be reviewed
again by the Village Board, 8-23-94 and any
members of the committee are invited to attend.
C. Development Code Mr. Sims states changes have been made to the
Code and a meeting of the committee will be
scheduled at a, later date.
D. Text Amendment No report
OLD BUSINESS
A letter from Rev* Robert L. Shaner of the Moorings was circulated, thanking
the Commission members for our attention to the Meier Road situation,
NEW BUSINESS
Per Chairman, deibelrs request Mr., Si
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO* NUCHAEL E. JANONIS9 VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, JR., DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: AUGUST 9, 1994
SUBJECT: ZBA-29-CU-94t ROUSE/RANDHURST COMPANY
LOCATIOA: 3009 3309 350-370 EAST KENSINGTON ROA1
(RANDRURST SHOPPING CENTER)
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request
for an amendment to PUD Ordinance No. 3604 to allow for removal of the existing structures and
construction of a general retail building and an auto service center.
The request was reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their meeting of July 28, 1994. At the
meeting, Mr. Mark Gershon of Rudnick and Wolfe, presented the request. Mr. Gershon *indicated
that Rouse Randhurst and Home Depot have been working with Village staff for over two years on
this request. He indicated that they believe that Home Depot will be a beneficial addition to the
Village. He indicated that the proposal would create approximately 200 construction jobs and 225
full and part time jobs with a $6 niiihon payroll. He stated that the center will generate approximately
$5 million in sales tax revenues and $3251,000 in real estate revenues.
Mr. Gershon, with the assistance of Rouse Randhurst, Home Depot and Gorove/Slade (traffic
consultants) representatives gave an overview of the development. Home Depot is proposing a
122,750 square foot facility with a 28,106 square foot garden center at the southeast comer of the
Randhurst Shopping Center. Home Depot is the world's largest home improvement retailer and ranks
among the twenty largest retailers in the nation. The stores stock approximately 30,000 different
kinds of building material, home improvement supplies and garden products. They believe that they
will provide Mount Prospect residents with the greatest supply of materials with the best service at
this location.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report. He indicated that staff has been working with
the petitioners in order to bring forward an appropriate site plan. He indicated that staff supports the
request with several conditions of approval.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. There was a lengthy discussion about the site
plan and the revised plans which were submitted by the petitioners. The revised site plan addressed
several of the conditions of staffs approval. Specific comments of the members are detailed in the
minutes of the meeting. By a vote of 5-1, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the
request. Mr. Cassidy explained his negative vote as a concern with the proposed traffic plan.
Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager
Page 2 •
August 9, 1994
Staff has reviewed the revised plans and recommends approval with the following conditions:
1. The following variations are necessary from the Village Code:
- Section 14.704.B - to allow a maximum building height of 40 feet instead of the
permitted 30 feet.
- Section 14.304.D. I. f - to allow fence height of 14 feet for the garden center and
12 feet for the loading area instead of the maximum allowed 8 feet.
- Section 14.1704.A - to allow a comer sideyard setback of 20 feet instead of the
minimum required 30 feet.
2. The petitioner shall stagger the building footprint along the Kensington Road frontage
to provide shading and reduce the visual impact of the building mass along this
roadway.
3. The nine parking spaces along Kensington Road for the Montgomery Ward Auto
Center shall be relocated a minimum of 10 feet from the property line.
4. The petitioner shall submit a final landscape plan in conformance with Village Code
requirements. All landscape material and berms shall be located on the Randhurst
property.
5. The petitioner shall install a traffic signal and additional turning lanes at the
Kensington Road/East Drive intersection at such time that warrants are met per
I.D.O.T. standards. All costs associated with these improvements shall be the
responsibility of the property owners.
6. The petitioner shall install a public sidewalk along its Kensington Road frontage.
7. The petitioner shall submit final engineering plans demonstrating adequate stormwater
detention. All infrastructure improvements shall meet Village Code standards.
8. The petitioner shall submit a signage package for staffs review and approval. All
sips shall comply with Village Code.
9. The petitioner shall construct a 12 foot perimeter fence With similar, materials as
utilized on the building. The garden center fence shall be reduced to 14 feet and shall
be constructed of wrought iron material.
10. The petitioner shall comply with all Village Codes relating to the demolition and
construction of the buildings.
WJC:hg
ROUSE-RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER, INC.,, a subsidiary of,
TEE ROUSE COMPANY
August 10, 1994
Mr. William Cooney
Director A IG I
Village of Mount Prospect 1994
Department of Planning and Zoning
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Randhurst Shopping Center
Home Depot - Request for Variance
of Building Height Restrictions
Dear Bill:
As a part of the review and approval process of our PUD Amendment request, the
Village must decide whether to allow Home Depot to construct their proto-typical
building, as described by Sheet A3 of our application, as prepared by Greenberg -Farrow,
recognizing that portions of the exterior wall system of the building exceed the Village's
30'-00" building height restriction. We believe, for the following reasons, that the Home
Depot building as proposed does not violate the spirit of the ordinance, is consistent with
the shopping center's previously approved PUD agreement, and would be consistent
with, and complement, the existing center.
1) The rear (Kensington facing) elevation, and a majority of the side elevations, do
not exceed the maximum allowable building height (23'-00" vs. 30' ordinance).
2) The Total Sales/Child World building (which the Home Depot will replace)
currently exceed the maximum allowable building height at all four
building elevations.
3) Virtually all of the Home Depot building will be shorter than the existing Child
World building (only 120 linear feet of wall, on the front, mall facing, elevation,
will be greater in height than the Child World building). %
4) The front, mall facing elevation of the proposed Home Depot building will be
consistent in height with other shopping center buildings, such as:
J.C. Penney
531-611
Carson's
37'-311
Wards
351-1011
Bank Plaza
671-31f
10275 Little Patuxent Parkway Columbia, Maryland 21044-3456
Randhurst Shopping Center - Home Depot
August 10, 1994
Page 2
5) The height of tallest portion of the Home Depot wall (above the main entry) is
virtually the same as the existing building's entry "feature".
6) The Home Depot building is set back further from both Kensington Road 'and
the adjacent (to the east) residential community than the Child World building,
thereby helping to mitigate the effects of the height of the walls.
7) The proposed landscaping materials along the side and real elevations, as well
as the stepped effect of the loading dock and Garden Center walls, will also
mitigate this condition, as will the offsets and other modifications proposed for
the rear elevation.
As a result, we do not believe that enforcing, to the letter of the ordinance, the
maximum allowable building height restrictions is 'Warranted in this instance, and request
that the Village accept the building wall heights and elevations as proposed. The Rouse
Company strongly believes that the plan we have presented, amended to address the
Planning Department's other concerns, will be a dramatic improvement for the shopping
center and the community from today's existing condition, and will satisfy the intent of
all of the Village's ordinances.
We appreciate all of your, and your staff s help on this project. Together we have
developed a plan that we will all be proud of.
Sincerely,
Jerome N. Morstein
Senior Project Manager
JNM/Imh
cc: Anthony F. Albanese
F. Scott Ball
Christopher B. Carlaw
Michael Folio - Home Depot
Tony Lucenko - Greenberg -Farrow
MIN"UTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-29-CU-94
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: July 28, 1994
ROUSE/RANDHURST COMPANY
3007 330:0 350-370 East Kensington Road
(Randhurst Shopping Center)
June 8. 1994 (Journal)
The petitioners are requesting to amend
Planned Unit Development Ordinance #3604
as adopted on February 4, 1986 to allow for
the removal of three existing structures and
the construction of a general retail building
and an auto service center with any
necessary variations. -
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Leo Floros
Peter Lannon
Elizabeth Luxem
Jack Verhasselt
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced case ZBA-29-CU-94 being a request to amend Planned
Unit Development Ordinance #3604 as adopted on February 4, 1986 to allow for the
removal of three existing structures and the construction of a general retail building and an
auto service center with any necessary variations.
Mr. Mark Gershon introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Gershon
works for Rudnick & Wolf Company and represents the petitioners. Mr. Gershon stated
that Rouse-Randhurst Corporation has been working for about 2 years with regards to the
development of the Home Depot. The petitioner feels the addition of Home Depot in this
area would strongly benefit the residents and community in terms of revenues for the
I-ar7"D"A-29-CU-94
Page 2
I.,
Village, creating new employment opportunities, and since the residential homes in the
surrounding area are generally older, they feel there is a genuine need for this type of retail
store. Mr. Gershon stated that this proposed project would create approximately 200
construction jobs and after the building is erected, approximately 225 to 250 jobs. The
payroll would be approximately $6 million. The center would generate approximately $5
million in sales tax revenues and approximately $325,000 in real estate revenues. Mr.
Gershon further stated that the Home Depot is rated 9 1 in the U. S. to work for. He stated
that the Rouse-Randhurst Shopping Center generates approximately 30% of the Village
revenues due to property and sales tax and by bringing Home Depot to this location, it
would increase the economic growth in the community. Mr. Gershon explained the site
plan included a new landscape with 15' to 18' of trees in front with a 3' berm along
Kensington Road. The current building would be torn down and built finiher away from
the residents. Mr. Gershon then explained the elevations of the buildings. Also, the new
auto express building would be constructed north/south as opposed to the current building
east/west. There will also be a reduction in the amount of bays.
Mr. Gershon introduced representatives of the project who are with him to answer any
questions that they may have with regards to this proposed project. They are Todd
Fishbein with Rudnick & Wolf & Tony LeSenco, with Greenberg & Ferro, who are the
site development coordinators for all Home Depots in the U.S. Also, Scott Ball with
Rouse- Randburst Corporation, Fred Gorove with Gorove/Slade Associates (who prepared
the traffic report), Jerry Morstein, Project Manager with Rouse-Randhurst and Joe Earl,
Operations Manager with, Rouse-Randhurst.
Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Mr. Forsythe noted that the home improvement center is a permitted use in the B-3 zoning
Classification. The auto center is a replacement of the existing auto service which is a
Conditional Use in the zoning district. The petitioners are proposing a 37 foot setback
along Kensington. Staff would note that this setback does not include a 17 foot right-of-
way dedication which would increase the total dedicated right-of-way to 50 feet along
Kensington. This results in a 20 foot setback for the building. Staff recommends approval
of the PUD amendment with the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall dedicate the
northern 17' of the Kensington Road right-of-way along the northern border of the
Randhurst property during approval process. 2. The Home Depot building footprint shall
be staggered along the front and rear and additional architectural features be added to the
building to create a more visually appealing facade. Staff has not had a chance to review
the new plan submitted this evening which appears to address this issue. 3. The petitioner
must demonstrate a hardship warranting the approval of a variation to allow building
height to exceed, 30 feet. 4. The 9 parking spaces along Kensington for the Auto Center
shall be relocated 18 feet to the north and additional landscaping shall be installed. Staff is
asking for parking to be shifted because after the 20 foot right-of-way dedication, those
ZBA-29-CU-94
Page 3
parking spaces will be on the right-of-way line. 5. A revised landscape plan which
provides a significant buffer and visual impact along the Kensington frontage shall be
submitted for approval by the Planning Director. G. A traffic signal and additional turning
lanes shall be installed on Kensington Road at such time that traffic counts warrant their
installation as determined by the Village and/or ]DOT. 7. The petitioner shall submit
engineering plans demonstrating adequate storage of storm water detention. Staff does
note that the new site plan indicates additional storms sewers which appear. adequate. 8.
All signage shall comply with Village Code. 9. The petitioner shall construct the 12'
perimeter fence of similar materials as utilized on the building and reduce the garden
center fence to a maximum height of 12' or alternative screening. 10. All Village Codes
regarding the demolition and construction of the buildings shall be complied with. Also,
Mr. Forsythe noted the variations required. They are: 1. A variation from Section
14.704.E to allow a maximum building height of 40 feet instead of the maximum allowed
.30 feet. 2. A variation to Section 14'.304.D. Lf to allow fence heights of 20 feet -for the
garden center and 12 feet for the loading area screening instead of the maximum allowed 8
feet. 3. A variation from Section 14.1704.A to allow a comer sideyard setback of 20 feet
instead of the minimum allowed 30 feet after a 17 foot dedication along Kensington Road.
Bill Cooney referenced staff recommendation of number 6 listed above. The petitioner has
requested that this requirement by tied to IDOT service standard levels So that there is an
objective standard applied. He stated that staff concurs with this request and will reword
this condition. Currently, there is no fight at the intersection of East drive and Kensington
Road. Mr. Lannon asked if there were plans to eliminate the current left turn lane. Mr.
Forsythe stated that currently there is an arrow on a stop fight in a through lane and there
is a proposed installation of a specified left lane. Mr. Forsythe further noted that the new
Jewel facility will deter traffic with the re -alignment of the east drive. Mr. Gershon stated
that the Center has always made it clear their willingness to dedicate the Kensington Road
right-of-way. They have and will continue to work with staff with regards to the concerns
listed above.
Ms. Luxem asked about condition number 4 which would eliminate parking spaces and
enable the customers to park of the North side where customers normally do not go. Mr.
Morestein, Senior Project Engineer, Rouse-Randhurst Corporation stated they have
concerns with staff recommendation with regards to the shifting of the parking in this
location. He stated that the end of the building is sales and stock and by eliminating this
area it would dramatically reduce the customer service area. Also, the configuration is
different from the majority of other Wards Auto Service Centers by reducing the drive to
42' from 60'. The new curb lane would be the same as the existing.
Mr. Lannon asked what -percentage of the mall is currently leased. Mr. Gershon stated
that current leasing in Randhurst Mall is 90%. Mr. Scott Ball, Vice -President General
ZBA-29-CU-94
Page 4
Manager Randhurst Corporation added that what they consider leased is how many are
currently paying rent. In response to Mr. Lannods question, Mr. Ball stated that currently
there is approximately 801% in operation at the mall at this time.
Mr. Cassidy asked the petitioner to explain why the elevation is 42 feet. Mr. Tony
LeSenco, Site Development Coordinator for Home Depot stated that the building drops
14' from ftont to back. Approximately 8' will be used for storm water run off (1/4" per
foot). The tallest part of the building would be the Home Depot sip which is their only
identification on the building. Ms. Luxem inquired about the elevations of the other mall
buildings. In response, Mr. LeSenco stated that Carson's elevation is 3 7.3', JC Penneys
36.6', Child World 42'. and NBD Bank 54.9' elevation. The Home Depot will be facing
the interior of the Center and that the requested height is consistent -with other building
heights.
The proposed screening wall will be 210 feet off the street. The proposed 12' wall will be
of a masonry construction. The 20' fence will be wrought iron. There will be s cant
improvement of the current property with berming and landscaping. There will also be a
canopy top to be used seasonally for the outdoor garden supply area.
Mr. Cassidy asked about the drainage concerns by the Auto Service Center. In response,
Mr. Cooney stated that they will provide underground storage in a 60' pipe.
Mr. Cassidy referenced concerns with IDOT recommendation for the Kensington/Rand
Road traffic. Mr. Cooney noted that IDOT is working on two configurations for that area
and no final decision has been made.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed traffic concerns in and around the
Mall. Specifically, East Drive and Kensington Road with regards to narrowing and
eliminating a lane and possible future traffic lights at this intersection.
Mr. Verhasselt then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve an amendment to
Planned Unit Development Ordinance 93604 as adopted on February 4, 1986 to allow for
the removal of three existing structures and the construction of a general retail building
and an auto service center with the following variations: 1. A variation from Section
14.704.E to allow a maximum building height of 40 feet instead of the maximum allowed
30 feet. 2. A variation to Section 14.304.D.1 -f to allow fence heights of 20 feet for the
garden center and 12 feet for the loading area screening instead of the maximum allowed 8
feet. And, 3. A variation from Section 14.1704.A to allow a comer sideyard setback of 20
feet instead of the minimum allowed 30 feet after a 17 foot dedication along Kensington
Road. Also, petitioner agrees to comply, with the recommendations that staff has made in
ZBA-29-CU-94
Page 5
their letter to the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 13, 1994. Conditions are fisted above.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Floros.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Floros, Luxem, Verhasselt
NAYS: Cassidy
ABSTENTION: Lannon
The motion was approved by a vote of 5-1.
Please note Mr. Cassidy would approve but has concerns with the intersection design at
Kensington Road and the East Drive.
Also, Mr. Lannon's abstention is because he is a shareholder in Home Depot.
Respectfully submitted,
A
ulie Ann Bouris
Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, IUinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
RAY P. FORSYTHE9 PLANNER
DATE:
JUNE 139 1994
CASE NO.:
ZBA-29-CU-94
APPLICANT:
ROUSE BURST COMPANY
ADDRESS:
300, 3309 350-370 EAST IKENSINGTON ROAD
(RANDH; T SHOPPING CENTER)
LOCATION :
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3 Community Shopping with a PUD
LOT SIZE: N/A
%COVERAGE: N/A
Gil Basnik Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The petitioners are requesting, to amend Planned "nit 'Development Ordinance #3604 as adopted on
February 4, 1986 to allow for the removal ofthree existing structures and the construction, of
general retail building and an auto service center with any: necessmy variations.
171
Summary of'Applicatiow* The petitioners have sibmfitted an app cation, site� plan,landscapeplan,,
elevations, a site plan and a, traffic impact analysis, f6t the proposal. The application indicates that the
PUD Amendment involves (i) the demolition of two exiisting vacant buildings-, (H) the construction
of a new Home Depot Store; and (iii) the removal and replacement of the Auto Service Center with
a more modern facility. The underlying purpose of the proposed PUD amendment is to allow for the
development of a Home Depot Store which will provide, slil cant revenue and employment
opportunities for the community, In addition, the proposal would fitrther serve the public
convenience by providing the, community with a state of the art home uinprovernent center.
impact on Surroundiing Propertilevo The petitioners are seeking to change the approved PUD for
Randhurst Shop- Cert,er. The on"OW, site plan which, was approved in 1986 indicated the existing
PM19 '
Wards Auto Center and the Child World/Total Sales Furniture building.
zoning ciam , &
Staff would note that the home improvement center is, a permitted, use in the B-3 6catio,
The auw center Lis a replacement offhe c(isting auto service,which 'is a Conditional Use mi the zo
Following is an analysis of the site plan as presented:
The Home Depot facility consists of approximately 122,750 square feet of general retail
space, a 28,106 square foot garden center and an enclosed truck loading area. In addition,
the Montgomery Wards Tire, Batteries and Automotive Center is proposed to be replaced
with an 11,280 square foot building with parking. The petitioners are proposing a37 foot
setback along Kensington. Staff would note that this set] =,k, does not include a 17 foot right-
of-way dedication which would increase the total dedicated right-of-way to 50 feet which is
similar to that which is along Kensington. This results in a 20 foot setback for the building.
The site plan also indicates a setback of approximately 80 feet for the auto center and a 20
foot setback for parking for the auto center.
The proposal would eliminate a driveway for the auto center and an access drive into the Mall
which is currently between the Child'World building and the auto center. 'The petitioner is,
proposing a traffic light,, at East Drive wi I thout a left -tum lane.Traffic, Issues will be further
discussed in,' the traffic analysi's section of this report.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning, Board of Appeals
Page 3
Because the proposal is located within the Randhurst Shopping Center, parking is calculated at 4
spaces per 1,000 square feet. The property is currently improved with 6,390 parking spaces which
is 1,700 spaces in excess of the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Staff would reconunend the 9
spaces along Kensington be moved 18 feet north to increase the green space along Kensington Road.
Staff would note that at peak times there could be a large concentration of parking demand in this
general location due to the existence of Home Depot, J C Penney, and Kohls all sharing this field of
parking. However, there is clearly an abundance of parking located on the R'andhurst property to
adequately serve the proposed use.
The petitioners have submitted a preliminary landscape plan. Staff would reconunend additional
foundation plantings along the rear. If the petitioner is proposing locating berms along Kensington,
it should be indicated on the landscape and engineering plans,." Staff would recommend that the
landscaping be shifted to the north to within 20 feet of the building so that the long-term maintenance
can be ensured after the 17 foot dedication. Staff would also recommend that a greater variety of
species be chosen to break up the monotony. The Zoning Ordinance requires that a final plan be
submitted to the Planning Director for approval prior to issuance of building permits.
The petitioners have submitted a traffic impact analysis prepared by Gorovel/Slade Associates, Inc.
The study concludes that a traffic signal will be warranted at East Drive and Kensington after the
Home Depot is constructed. Staff would also note that East Drive is proposed to be reduced from
the existing 63.5 feet in width to 41 feet along the building and to 30 feet into the center. It is also
suggested that no left -turning lane is warranted at the proposed signal. Staff has reviewed this
information and at this time can support the recommendation. However, staff would reconunend that
the petitioner be required to install left -turn lanes from Kensington Road into the Center at such time
that traffic counts warrant their installation. It should be noted that IDOT has jurisdiction on this
roadway and permits from IDOT will be required.
ff IF 1,
ldiim M.J Kis 11,14-
Rmcillum has previously committed to dedicating the northern I T of the Kensington Road right-of-
way when IDOT requests the dedication. For the purpose of this submittal the documents show a
37 foot setback from the current property line to the Home Depot facility. Because the 17 foot
dedication is eminent the actual setback will be reduced to 20 feet. The existing Child World facility
is approximately in the same setback as the proposed Home Depot. By increasing the landscaping
an berming along Kensington as well as minimizing the monotony of the building, staff can support
the requested 20 foot setback.
G -i -I Bunk Chairman Page 4
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
The front of the fiwility faces north towards the shopping center. The plans indicate that the building
shall be constructed of tan concrete block with water repellant coating. There is a 7 foot orange
accent band approximately 12 feet from the ground that continues along the front, rear and west
elevations. Also indicated are two orange metal roofs which are extended above the entrance and
exit areas. The garden center includes a greenhouse and fenced -in covered area for outdoor storage.'
The rear elevation 'includes an overhead door at the southwest comer of the building. Staff would
like the petitioners to discuss the use of this door as there is no paved access in this area. Along the
east end of the building is a 12 foot high wood fence which screens the truck loading area and the
garden center pickup. Staff would rend, this be constructed of materials similar to the building
to. ensure long-term maintenance and aesthetics. Also visible at the southeast corner of the building
is the 20 foot high green vinyl coated chain fink fence which screens the garden center. Staff
recommends that this fence be reduced to a maximum of 12' to be compatible with the perimeter
fence. All medbanical equipment and other roof apparatus will be screened from view of amunding
properties.
The east elevation contains a 12 foot high wood fence to screen the truck loading area. Staff would
recommend this be designed with brick material to match the building. Also visible is the 20 foot
green vinyl chain link fence in the garden center.
Staff has concerns with the mass of a 500 foot long (470 feet along the rear) building along the
Kensington frontage. Staff would recommend that the petitioner stagger the building footprint to
provide shadowing and increased visual appeal. It is also recommended that the petitioner utilize
additional architectural features and building materials to mitigate the warehouse appearance of the
building. False facade features may be appropriate, especially along the Kensington elevation.
The Zoning Ordinance allows buildings with a maximum height of 30 feet in the B-3 District. The
front elevation varies, in height from 32 feet to 40 feet at the top of the front entrance feature. The
Kensington Road elevation is 26' tall and does conform with Village Codes. The petitioner must
explain why the building height increases 14 feet from the rear to the front of the building. If there
is no functional reason to have the added height, staff would recommend lowering the building to
conform with the Zoning Ordinance.
Auto Center
The elevations submitted for the auto center include 8 overhead doors which pass through from east
to west and are red in color. -The elevations indicate a brick building with tempered glass at the south
end of the building which contains the offi,ce and waiting,area,,*,,, and, approximately 10 feet of Drivit
capping off the building. The structure is 21 feet, in height, which 115, * below the maximum allowed irl
the B-3 Distnict. Staff would recommend the petitioners submit color renderings and sample
materials for discussion by the Zoning Board members.
G"U" Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 5
DErA&URnA—LQ2AM,, ND
The Engineering and Inspection Services Departments have indicated that the 17 foot right-of-way
dedication along Kensington should be done at this time; Engineering has also inquired about the
plans for detention.
The petitioners, are seeking an amendment to the PUD to construct a Home Depot Center and
reconstruct a Montgotrwy Wards Tire Battery and Automotive Center. Staff recommends approval
of the PUD amendment with the following conditions:
I The petitioner shall dedicate the northern 17' of the Kensington Road right-of-way
along the northern border of the Randhurst property.
2. The Home Depot building footprint shall be staggered along the front and rear and
additional architectural features be added to the building to create a more visually
appealing facade.
3. The petitioner must demo - e a hardship warranting the approval of a variation to
'1^ 30 f
allow building height to exceed led.
4. The 9 parking spaces along Kensington for the Auto Center shall be relocated 18 feet
to the north and additional landscaping shall, be installed.
5'. A revised landscape plan which provides a significant buffer and visual impact along
the Kensington frontage shall be submitted for approval by the Planning Director.
6. A traffic signal and additional turning lanes shall be installed on Kensm" gton Road at
such time that traffic counts warrant their installation as determined by the Village
and/or IDOT.
7. The petitioner shall submit engineening plans derrionstrafing adequate storage of storm
water detention.
8. All signage shall comply with Village Code.
9. The petitioner shall construct the 12' perimeter fence of similar materials as utilized
on the building and reduce the garden center fence to a maximum height of 12'.
10. All Village Codes regarding the demolition and construction of the buildings shall be
complied with.
F...' "r I -.I
Village of Mount Prospect,
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM:
ASSISTANT TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE:
JUNE 911994
SUBJECT:
CROSS -CONNECTION CONTROL PROGRAM
Due to the complexity of the implementation of this Ordinance, the following outline
details the issues and elements necessary to comply with this mandate. The IEPA has
not defined penalties which may be levied against the Village of Mount Prospect for non-
compliance. However, as more municipalities implement the regulations, the number of
municipalities which have yet to implement the regulations is at such a level that IEPA
has the staff resources to focus on the remaining towns to force full State-wide
compliance. It is unclear what type of penalties IEPA may impose on municipalities who
refuse to comply. In an effort not to test the available sanctions IEPA may pose and to
minimize contamination exposure of the water system, we feel it is important to move
forward with implementing this Ordinance.
Without the implementation and follow-up of this mandate, the Village and the business
user has significant liability exposure without the proper flow devices. However, once the
program is implemented and the proper follow-up program is underway, both the Village
and business user would have virtually no liability exposure.
Sgecifics of IEPA Mandate:
A. Require plumbing of each new service be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the Illinois State Plumbing Code.
Status: Mount Prospect is in full compliance.
B. Require water customers to correct Plumbing Code violations which are a
threat to the public water supply whenever such violations are discovered.
Status: Mount Prospect has actively enforced the Plumbing Code as
specified by the State.
C. Conduct a survey of all water services every two years. The survey would
develop an inventory of how customers use water. Where potentially
hazardous conditions are suspected, the water customer shall be required
to have a licensed plumber to:
Inspect the plumbing and test and maintain all cross -connection
control devices annually.
2. Install a fixed air gap or a reduced pressure zone (RPZ) backflow
.preventer on the incoming service line to the premises. The air gap
or RPZ must be maintained, inspected and tested annually.
Status: All new construction or service upgrades must install the
required devices as part of the application and review
process. The Village of Mount Prospect has no Ordinance
requiring retrofitting of these devices.
10KOOK10
A. Survey" potentially high-risk commercial or industrial water users. The
survey results will assist the Village staff to prioritize the users which will be
required to install some type of cross -connection device. The risk
assessment will be based on the type of business and the potential
contamination risk to the Village water system. The survey review process
will involve the Plumbing Inspector and Water Superintendent. The Public
Works Department will be responsible for follow-up to ensure the surveys
are returned. Failure to return surveys will cause a citation to be issued.
B. Water users who are determined to have a high-risk potential to the Village
water system will be required to install, test and maintain the control device
as recommended by the Village. The risk hierarchy will be addressed in
descending order. The Public Works Department will be responsible for
isolating the municipal water system from high-risk users. Once the system
is isolated from the municipal water system, the Inspection Services
Department will be responsible for containing any contamination which
enters the water user's service, but stays within their metered internal
service.
C. Follow-up to the maintaining and testing of such devices will be performed
through annual certification and re -surveying every two years to monitor
compliance.
D. Annual administration fee of $50 will be assessed by the Village per device
to fund the administration of plan review; inspection and surveying costs.
The cost to install the recommended, device would be the responsibility of
the water customer.
Progosed achedulle of ilmol!gmenlabon.
A.
Provide general information to the Village Board:
June 1994
B.
Advise Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce:,
June/July 1994
(Coordinate implementation of regulations through meetings with sample of
high-risk potential water users.)
C.
Adopt Ordinance implementing IEPA mandates:
August 1994
D.
Distribute and analyze surveys:
September -December 1994
E.
Begin notifying potential high-risk water users
of proper control devices:
Spring/Summer 1995
'1 111111111 qpIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111 qq��"' 11 1111111111111111111! 1111111111111111 11111111q�
Consideration of waiving of permit fees for installation of such devices.
Required to pass Ordinance as mandated by IEPA; however, the proposed
implementation schedule may be revised according to Village Board
desires.
Have the opportunity to work with high-risk potential water users to
implement Ordinance through discussions with local cornmercialfindustrial
users. Typically, mandates are imposed without detailed implementation
discussions with the persons affected.
Pursue financial assistance programs to assist commercialfindustrial users
in complying with the Ordinance.
Consideration of reviewing the proposed $50 fee per device.
.,e�DAVID STRAHL
DS/rcc
INTAI
Mount Prospect Public 'Works Department
'Im'dry Lu
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works.
DATE: April 29, 1994
On November 1, 1985, the State of Illinois passed Title 35 of
the Illinois Administrative Code,, which require-% all public
water suppliers to develop and maintain a. program to protect
their water supplies from contami nation due to backflow via
cross connections.
All Vill-age-owned, bullelings'
0 3 nclu our water distribution
on
system pump houses, have been. outfitted with backflow preventi=
devices and, since 1987, all new construction projects involving'
a commercial water connection have been.. requixed"L to install
backflow preventers. Unfortunat , these steps appear i nsu f f J
cient in light of the Illinois.Eavironmental Protectio=*Agency's
(IF.PA) redoil"hl efforts. cone: Illinois., backflow prevention, and the
Village of Mount Prospect needs, to -pass an ordinanc adelre =19
the issue.
Backf low control devices. el J mi nate the- chance for nonpotiflol e
liquids being siphoned 'Into -our distribution system. This; si-
phonage can occur if reduced, pressure- is" created in. water ma,I ns.
as customers. dray- water through their sex -vice conntmctions.
___temA_ - -1
Mount Prospect's type of water syIsre ion on tha physi. s
associated with a pressurized environment-, Stated simply, high-
er pressure forces the wa tet tawa-rds. lower pressure. Under
normal circumstans:es, pressure supplied by our elevatec-L tank and
pumps pushes. the water to our customers' faucets. Unfortunate-
ly, our control over the pre' J -zed- envi rarmumnt i.% not ahmnggg
lute. Main breaks and fire fighting operations are two example.%
of activities capable of creating dramatic low pressure_zoneswithin our main -s. Durk these types of events, the hydraulic'
gradient may shift enough to reverse the intended flow of'water
and actually draw water out of near by service. connect ns. If
these connections. are: affixed Ita, chemca mi xi n4'�' f agni 1 J or -
any nonpotable water supply, the,possibili exists'.that�danger-
ous backf low can, occur resulting-, in�, contain of our -ii
P!��c
water supply.
�e
f m!
Backf low can be derived, f ram one or two possibl' s ob` urces, a
backsiphonage situation or a backpressure situation.
Backsiphonage is caused by reduced or negative pressure in sup-
ply piping. Backpressuxe is backflow that can occur when supply
piping is connected to a system operating under higher pres-
sure. our normal system operating pressure ranges from 50 to 55
psi. Water systems operating at higher pressu es is. not & com-
mon occurrence. However, when fire sprinkling systems are
charged for testing, or our system supplies. certain industria2-
proces.ses, it is . possi'hl P ta encount.ex higher presauzea. X more
likely scenario for backpressure would. occur in combinationL with
backsiphonage where our system pressure i-s-reduc because of a.
main break and & circle lati pump, booster pump, or boiler. is.
simultaneously operating against a leaking check valve., Such a
situation would literally force nonpotable waters into our sys-
tem.
in the event our public water supply is contaminated by
backflow, the health of some water customers may be jeopar-
dized. In order to limit 1 1M-1
t. tb i A liability, abi 1-tty,, c ly with state
statutes, and safeguard the health and well. -being of our water
customers, a program development plan, a cross connection con-
trol ordinAnc ' e And & survey farm have been ed f attached or your
review. The goal of this effort is to install backf low preven-
tion devices on the service connections of all water customers
who present a. backf low contamation. threat to. our publ i a water
supply*
The development- II
s a brief outlinta'describing how the pro
gram will be formu3ated...- The orAinann-e was. written to accommo-
date IEPA suggestions as well 'as .incorporate some of our. own
backflow concerns and program development requirements. Thei
survey form is a. document that will be sent to water custx=ers
listed as commercial- accounts is our billing records. The -infor-
mation- garnered. f rom, these f orms will provide the store of data
that Public. Works and Inspection. Services persannel wi 11 ut i I J ze
to decide where backf low protection is necessary-..
It is my recommendation that these documentm be reviewed. and the
proposed ordinance considered- for Ad ptioxLe.
7 4 ...........
INN i
He'iberEL.- Wee_i'k s
HT 9W`/SPS /td-"
ri
attach
C. Finance-Director'-
Director- of Inspect -ion. Sery "ices
Deputy" Director', of_ Public. Works,
Water/Sewer- Superintendent
XCONNECT. ORD/FIT.E. /WAN=,
Val
State of Illinois
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Mary A. Gade,, Director 595 South State, Elgin, M 60123
708-741-7771
April 20, 1994
Facility -No. 031-1980
Cook County Mt. Prospect
Village President & Board of Trustees
Village Hall
100 South Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Gentlemen:
On April 14, 1994, Engineer Abad of this of f ice made a *visit to the
Mt. Prospect community water supply. Mr. Sean Dorsey,
Superintendent was contacted.
During Mr. Abad's visit, he found that you do not have an active
cross -connection control program and have not submitted a cross -
connection control ordinance to our Springfield office for approval
(Chapter II, Subtitle F, Section 653.801, Technical Policy
Statement).
Please review this deficiency and determine a plan of action to'
promptly correct it. A written reply outlining this plan is
requested.
If you have any questions, please advise this office at the above
address and phone number.
Very truly yours,
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
LUI,onard A. Lindstr, m,, P.E.
Regional Manager
Division of Public Water Supplies
LAL:esa
cc: Mr. H. Weeks, Director of Public Works
Mr. Sean Dorsey, Water Superintendent
Village Clerk
Cook County Health Department
Springfield
File
Printed on Recycled Paper
SERVICES
Your supply does not appear to have, an acceptable cross
connection control program. An active cross -connection control
program can signi f icantly rc
edue the risk of your publ i1c'water
supply being severely contaminated through unsafe plumbing
connections.
As a minimum, this program must include the following:
A. Require that'the plumbing of each new service be installed in
accordance with the requirements of the Illinois State Plumbing
Code.
B. Require water customers to correct plumbing code violations
which are a threat to the public water supply, whenever, such
violations are discovered.
C. Conduct a survey of all water services every two (2) years.
The purpose of this survey is to develop an inventory ' of the
way the customers use water. Where potentially hazardous-
• conditions are suspected, the water customer shall be requested
to have a licensed plumber, who has also been approved as a
backflow control device inspector, either:
,-
a) Inspect the plumbing and test and maintain all
cross -connection control devices annually.
b) install a fixed air gap or a reduced pressure zone, (RPZ)
backflow preventer on the service line to the premises.
This air gap or RPZ must be maintained, inspected and
tested annually.
A written record of your surveys must be maintained which includes:
i) the name and location of each customer required to have an
annual, *inspection, 2) the date each, cross -connection device was
installed and, 3) the annual test results for each device and a
summary of any repairs and changes made.
In order, to implement and enf oice items A, B and C above.. an
appropriate ordinance must be adopted. A, suggested, ordinance is
enclosed. (Title 35, Subtitle F,, Chapter II, Subpart H)
Village of Mount Prospect
Cross -Connection Control Program
Development Plan
July 23, 1994
1. Pro gmm Rmdem Per Title 35 Illinois Administrative, Code 607.101, et. seq. the
TEPA has mandated that all potable water supplies develop and administer a cross -
connection control program. The intent of this program is to isolate, and thereby
protect, the public potable water supply from private plumbing arrangements
conducive to hazardous backflow or back pressure incidents. This means that all
connections to the Village water system must be equipped with a backflow
prevention device. A cross -connection control program comprised of a proposed
cross -connection control ordinance, a cross -connection control survey, and a
cross -connection control program development plan has been formulated. Each of
these documents has been reviewed by the Public Works Department, Inspection
Services Department, Finance Department, and the Fire Department.
The Village program, as outlined, will address all potentially high-risk customers.
These customers will berequired to install a cross -connection control device on
their service fine connection based on Village policy to monitor and regulate
backflow or back pressure protection at the source of connection to the Village
water supply. Initially, the high risk category will most likely be comprised of
commercial and industrial water customers.
2. EXqg1qiyg Rgp—,,ew: Ordinance, survey, and development plan review and approval
by the Village Manager and the Village Board.
1 Itft*ti*af Survev: Cross -connection control device surveys will be mailed by the
Public Works Department to users considered commercial or industrial concerns.
The intent of the survey is to establish use. Simply, the survey will try to ascertain
what customers are doing with the water the Village supplies. If customers
introduce water into an environment in which a backflow incident would threaten
the quality of the public potable water supply, they will be considered a high risk
and be among the first users required to install a cross -connection control device.
During this initial survey, it will not be necessary to require customers to contract
a certified cross -connection control device inspector (CCCDI) in order to
complete the survey. All surveys will be returned to the Public Works Department
within 30 days of the notice date listed on survey form.
4, Anal: The Public Works Department and the Inspection Services Department
will jointly review all completed surveys and rank customers according to their
potential threat to the public potable water supply, The following hierarchy of risk
is suggested:
i. Industrial and Manufacturing Processes: Any concerns
which use or may use potable water as part of an
industrial or manufacturing process. Examples include
chemical plants, metal plating firms, etc.
ii. Sprinkler Systems: Fire suppression and underground,
watering systems.
Facilities, Mortuaries,
W Hospitals, Me&callDental F
Funeral Homes
iv. Dry Cleaners, Car Washes: Any facilities which may
utilize hot water boilers, instantaneous heat exchangers,
high pressure washers or any other device which may
cause the pressure in a service line to become greater
than the pressure in the main.
V. Restaurants, Food andlor Beverage Procemors,
Taverns: Any establishment which may introduce
carbonic acids or other contaminants to the potable
water supply.
A All RemainingCommercial and Industrial
Establishments.
A Schools and Public Buildings.
viii. Private Residences:
Multi -family buildings
Single-family homes
5. Int Property owners and/or tenants who do not return completed surveys to
the Public Works Department within 30 days of the notice date will be issued
violation notices. These notices will require the completed surveys to be returned
to Public Works within 30 days of the notice date. Failure to comply with a
violation notice will result in a discontinuation of water service per new proposed
ordinance.
P
6. Iajg_e,CpD_p_fi4ncg Wders: Inspection Services will issue compliance orders to
customers whose operations may threaten the public potable water supply. The
program will be developed in manageable phases. Customers posing the greatest
threat will be addressed first followed by customers comprising the hierarchy of
risk in descending order. The orders should be issued at a pace dictated by the
Village's resources. The EEPA requires only that a cross -connection ordinance be
enacted and that an active program be maintained. Currently, there are no
statutory time or performance requirements.
If so ordered, it shall be the water customer's responsibility to purchase, install,
test, and a backflow device approved by the Director of Inspection
Services and/or the Director of Public Works. Installation and testing shall be
performed by a state -licensed plumber certified to work with backflow prevention
devices.
In addition, a water customer ordered to install a backflow device on the service
fine will be required to submit a cross -connection connection survey completed by
a cross -connection control device inspector detailing cross connections existing
within the customer's private plumbing system.
Decisions regarding backflow protection on fire sprinkling systems include
consultation with the Fire Department Fire Prevention Bureau.
7. Cpm pliance T mpidng: A cross -connection control device compliance tracking
system will be established to monitor the annual certification process. Premises
with cross -connection control devices will be prompted to re -test the devices each
year with a notice generated by the tracking system and delivered via the U.S.
Mail. - The test results will be sent to the Inspection Services Department for
review and forwarded to Public Works where they will be entered into the
compliance tracking system. The annual re -inspection due date will correspond
with the anniversary of the date of installation/compliance.
This compliance tracking technique will also incorporate cross -connection control
devices installed prior to the enactment of this new ordinance. Many customers
9%
9sed cross -connection control devices when they built new facilities or
peifornud extensive remodeling. These devices will also be inventoried and
monitored for testing compliance.
8. &_r�v SghgO_W_,,e: The IOEPA requires that water customers be surveyed at least
every two (2) years. This rule is intended to make sure that public water supplies
(the Village) are aware of changes in customer water usage which may alter their
risk classifications. These re -surveys will be mailed semi-annually with the re-
certification notices.
Fell 9. &HQw.uv: Policies and procedures will be designed to facilitate the success of
this program. For example, some customers may have water heaters that utilize the
service line as a thermal expansion system. If a cross -connection control device is
installed in such an environment, the expansion relief system would be inoperable
which may result in damage to the heater. In addition, as a result of the survey
process, or physical MiSpections vitiated by this program, other potential cross
connections within a customers private plumbing may be identified. Whenever
situations such as these are discovered, water .customers will be advised of their
presence in writing and urged to take appropriate corrective action.
jo.Crqg5mc I- ., tro The development of a cross -connection control
gnnection n-
administration fee should be considered. Such a fee would be paid at the time the
customer is notified of the requirement to install a backflow prevention device. If
established, this fee would be collected annually to help recover compliance
tracking costs, survey costs, and annual inspection costs. A draft ordinance is
attached. A $50.00 fee is recommended.
SPD [C:\SEAN\WATER\CCCD\DEVPLAN.DOCI
4
Mf U1 Iola *out#
Company ,Name:
Address:
Contact Person:
Title: Phone Number.
Property Owner (if different than above):
Street Address:
City:, State: Zip: Phone
What type of business are you in? (Please be specific, i.e. dry cleaner, shoe store, etc.)
What is your principle use of potable water?,
VV094wir %Lfaw fill r UUMN clu"
Does your company use potable water in any man ufacturing/industrial process? U Yes U No
If yes, please specify:
Does your compaWy use any hazardous or toxic material or chemical in any kind of process? U Yes C1 No
If so, what'
Do any of your company's buildings contain any hot water boilers, steam boilers, or instantaneous heat 'exchange
water heaters? U Yes Q No
Are any of your company's buildings equipped with fire sprinkling systems that use chemical additives or outside
fire hose connections? 0 Yes U No
LOU1110WILIFU Vvaxur acrVIGO
What is the size of your company's domestic water service line?,.
What is the size of your company's domestic water service meter?
Does your company's domestic water service line have a cross connection control device? U Yes El No
If yes, please list the manufacturer. model:
Most recent test date: CCCDI Registration Number
Fire waxer service
What is the size of your company's fire water service line?
What is the size of your company's fire water service mete,
Does your company's fire service line have a cross connection control device? ❑ Yes El No
If yes, please list the manufacturer. model:
Most recent test date: CCCD1 Registration Number:
I hereby certify that, to the ' best of my knowledge, all of the above information is accurate and that both
domestic and fire water service lines have been protected from backflow or backpressure as required by
the Village of Mount Prospect.
Name: Title:
Signature: Date:
This form must be completed and returned to the Director of Public Works,
1700 West Central Road, Mount Prospect; IL 60056
within thirty (30) days of notice date per Village ordinance.
Village of Mount Prospect
Cross -Connection Control Program
Development Plan
July 23, 1994
1. Prog[am,,,,, : Per Title 35 Illinois Administrative Code 607.101, et, seq. the
TEPA has mandated that all potable water supplies develop and administer a cross -
connection control program. The intent of this program is to isolate, and thereby
protect, the public potable water supply from private plumbing arrangements
conducive to hazardous backflow or back pressure incidents. This means that all
connections to the Village water system must be equipped with a backflow
prevention device. A cross -connection control program comprised of a proposed
cross -connection control ordinance, a cross -connection control survey, and a
cross -connection control program development plan has been formulated. Each of
these documents has been reviewed by the Public Works Department, Inspection
Services Department, Finance Department, and the Fire Department.
The Village program, as outlined, will address all potentially high-risk customers.
These customers will be required to install a cross -connection control device on
their service fine connection based on Village policy to monitor and regulate
backflow or back pressure protection at the source of connection to the Village
water supply. Initially, the high risk category will most likely be comprised of
commercial and industrial water customers.
2. ENecu, tive Review: Ordinance, survey, and development plan review and approval
by the Village Manager and the Village Board.
3. l*
tiCross-connection control device surveys will be mailed by the
Public Works Department to users considered commercial or industrial concerns.
The intent of the survey is to establish use. Simply, the survey will try to ascertain
what customers are doing with the water the Village supplies. If customers
introduce water into an environment in which a backflow incident would threaten
the quality of the public potable water supply, they will be considered a high risk
and be among the first users required to install a cross -connection control device.
During this initial survey, it will not be necessary to require customers to contract
a certified cross -connection control device inspector (CCCDI) in order to
complete the survey. All surveys will be returned to the Public Works Department
within 30 days of the notice date listed on survey form.
4. Anal rsis: The Public Works Department and the Inspection Services Department
will jointly review all completed surveys and rank customers according to their
potential threat to the public potable water supply. The following hierarchy of risk
is suggested:
Industrial and Manufacturing Processes: Any concerns
which use or may use potable water as part of an
industrial or manufacturing process. Examples include
chemical plants, metal plating firms,, etc.
U. Sprinkler Systems: Fire suppression and underground
watering systems.
iii. Hospitals, MedicallDental Facilities, Mortuaries,
Funeral Homes.
iv. Dry Cleaners, Car Washes: Any facilities which may
utilize hot water boilers, *instantaneous heat at exchangers,
high pressure washers or any other device which may
cause the pressure in a service line to become greater
than the pressure in the main.
V. Restaurants,, Food and/or Beverage Processors,
Taverns: Any establishment which may introduce
carbonic acids or other contaminants to the potable
water supply.
All Remaining Commercial and Industrial
Establishments.
A Schools and Public Buildings.
viii. Private Residences:
Multi -family buildings
Single-family homes
5. Int . Property owners and/or tenants who do not return completed surveys to
the Public Works Department within 30 days of the notice date will be issued
violation notices. These notices will require the completed surveys to be returned
to Public Works within 30 days of the notice date. Failure to comply with a
violation notice will result in a discontinuation of water service per new proposed
ordinance.
6. Islsug _CQMRjiance Orders: Inspection Services will issue compliance orders to
customers whose operations may threaten the public potable water supply. The
program will be developed in manageable phases. Customers posing the greatest
threat will be addressed first followed by customers comprising the hierarchy of
risk in descending order. The orders should be issued at a pace dictated by the
Village's resources. The IGEPA requires only that a cross -connection ordinance be
enacted and that an active program be maintained. Currently, there are no
statutory time or performance requirements.
If so ordered, it shall be the water customer's responsibility to purchase, install,
test, and maintain a backflow device approved by the Director of Inspection
Services and/or the Director of Public Works. Installation and testing shall be
performed by a state -licensed plumber certified to work with backflow prevention
devices.
In addition, a water customer ordered to install a backflow device on the service
fine will be required to submit a cross -connection connection survey completed by
a cross -connection control device inspector detailing cross connections existing
within the customer's private plumbing system.
Decisions regarding backflow protection on fire sprinkling systems include
consultation with the Fire Department Fire Prevention Bureau.
7. 1C,ombance Tracki ._.: A cross -connection control device compliance tracking
system will be established to monitor the annual certification process. Premises
with cross -connection control devices will be prompted to re -test the devices each
year with a notice generated by the tracking system and delivered via the U.S.
Mail. The test results will be sent to the Inspection Services Department for
review and forwarded to Public Works where they will be entered into the
compliance tracking system. The annual re -inspection due date will correspond
with the anniversary of the date of installation/compliance.
This compliance tracking technique will also incorporate cross -connection control
devices installed prior to the enactment of this new ordinance. Many customers
installed cross -connection control devices when they built new facilities or
performed extensive remodeling. These devices will also be inventoried and
monitored for testing compliance.
8. Sum gyS, : The IEPA requires that water customers be surveyed at least
every two (2) years. This rule is intended to make sure that public water supplies
(the Village) are aware of changes in customer water usage which may alter their
risk classifications. These re -surveys will be mailed semi-annually with the re-
certification notices.
9. Follow-up: Policies and procedures will be designed to facilitate the success of
this program. For example, some customers may have water heaters that utilize the
service line as a thermal expansion system. If a cross -connection control device is
installed in such an environment, the expansion relief system would be inoperable
which may result in damage to the heater. In addition, as a result of the survey
process or physical inspections initiated by this program, other potential cross
connections within a customer's private plumbing may be identified. Whenever
situations such as these are discovered, water customers will be advised of their
presence in writing and urged to take appropriate corrective action.
10. Cron :cgnntc_tiojj control fee. The development of a cross -connection control
administration fee should be considered. Such a fee would be paid at the time the
customer is notified of the requirement to install a backflow prevention device. If
established, this fee would be collected annually to help recover compliance
tracking costs, survey costs, and annual inspection costs. A draft ordinance is
attached. A $50.00 fee is recommended.
SPD [C:\SEAN\WATER\CCCD\DEVPLAN.DOC]
PW/caf
7/28/94
ORDINANCE NO. I
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 21.513 entitled "Water Meter Rental Fees and
Construction Water Use Fees" of Chapter 21 of the Village code of Mount Prospect, as
amended, is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with a new Section 21.513
entitled "Water Meter rental Fees, Construction Water Use Fees, and Cross -Connection
Control Fees"; so that hereinafter said Section 21.513 shall be and read as follows:
Sec. 21.513. Water Meter Rental Fees, Construction Water Use
Fees, and Cross -Connection Control Fees.
A. Fees shall be charged for the rental of water meters according to the
following schedule:
1. The charge for connecting a five-eighths inch (5/8") to and including
a one and one-half inch (1-1/2") orifice size disc water meter,
including a flat rental fee and charge for ordinary maintenance and
repair for the life thereof; shall be the current cost of the meter at the
time of it's purchase, plus (30%) thirty percent of the said cost
figured to the closest dollar.
2. The charge for connecting a two inch (2") orifice size or larger
turbine, compound or line meter shall be the current cost of the
meter at the time of it's purchase, plus (30%) thirty percent of the
said cost figured to the closest dollar as well as a flat rental fee plus
the cost and expense of necessary maintenance and repairs made
by the Village of Mount Prospect during the life of the said meter,
which later charges for maintenance shall be billed to the customer
when incurred.
B. Construction Water Use Fee: For all construction, a deposit of two hundred
dollars ($200.00) shall be paid for the use of a construction water meter and
water used will be billed by the Village Treasurer in accordance with the
normal water rates in effect at the time of use. It shall be unlawful for the
user to install said construction water meter on any fire hydrant. It will,
therefore, be the users responsibility to supply the necessary tap and/or
pipe work for this construction water meter.
C. Cross -Connection Control Program Administration Fee: For each cross -
connection control device installed, a fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) shall be
paid by the property owner upon whose premises the device was installed.
The Village Treasurer shall bill each such water customer at the date of
installation and thereafter at the annual anniversary of said date. Property
owners with cross -connection control devices installed
Chapter 21
Page 2 of 2
prior September 1, 1994 shall be billed the appropriate amount by the
Village Treasurer upon notification of the presence of said devices and
annually thereafter upon the anniversary of said notification date. "
SEC T,j,OND&O�. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of $1994.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
(Please type or print neatly)
#&so IW9
Company Name:
Address:
Contact Person:
Title: . . .. .. ......... . . ............... Phone Number:
. ..............
Property Owner (if different than above):,
Street Address. -
City: State, Zip: Phone:
What type of business are you in? (Please be specific, i.e. dry cleaner, shoe store, etc.)
What is your principle use of water?
Water Use Information
Does your company use potable water in any manufacturing/industrial process? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, please specify:
Does your company use any hazardous or toxic material or chemical in any kind of process? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Ifso, what? ............... .. .. ........... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
Do any of your company's buildings contain any hot water boilers, steam boilers, or instantaneous heat exchange
water heaters? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Are any of your company's buildings equipped with fire sprinkling systems that use chemical additives or outside
fire hose connections? ❑ Yes ❑ No
- Domestic Water Service
What is the size of your company's domestic water service line?
What is the size of your company's domestic water service meter?. ...................
Does your company's domestic water service line have a cross connection control device? ❑ Yes
If yes, please list the manufacturer:— I model: I
Most recent test date," CCCDI Registration Number:
■
. . . ........
Fire water uervice
What is the size of your company's fire water service line?
What is the size of your company's fire water service meter?
Does your company's fire service line have a cross connection control device? LJ Yes U No
If yes, please list the manufacturer, model,
Most recent test date:-- CCCDI Registration Number-
Gomninea uomesvc at rire
If your company's water line a combined domestic/fire service? El Yes J No
If yes, what size is? What size is the meter?,
Does your company's combined domestic water/fire service line have a cross connection control
device? J Yes U No
If yes, please list the manufacturer: model:
Most recent test date: CCCD1 Registration Number:
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, all of the above information is accurate and that both
domestic and fire water service lines have been protected from backflow or backpressure as required by
the Village of Mount Prospect (Please print)
Name: Title:
Signature: — Date:
This form must be completed and returned to the Director of Public Works,
1700 West Central Road., Mount Prospect, IL 60056
within thirty (30) days of notice date per Village ordinance.
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRO,',E-;PECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLI NOIS-
WI-1Ef'-`111'11,'EAF3J the. Illinois Plumbing Code and flllinois Adminstrativre, Code reqlt,xe protectior"i
A,
of the potaale water systern frorn due to back",r-low or backsiphonc,:,,,ge of
coma riii nants thrOUgh the water serg 1ce con(-IE.�cflon; and
WHCE�REAS, the 'Illinoi's Pollution Control Board Regulations of Illinois Administrative Code
require an aCJive prograrn of cross -connection control which will prevent the contarnination
of all potable water supply systerns- and
WHER,EAS, in order to accomplish these.,;goalls, it is necess�--,ry to introduce rr-,-,stric�ions
that describe'ire detail specific procedurez,-:,; and requirernents L)r cross-connectioncorli't'01.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD 0,F
TRUS'[EES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
SECTlOI[-7-,, That Section 22,402,2 en'Utled""Cross Connections" of IV of"
ter 22 of the Village. Code of Moi.,int Prospect, as amel-ided, is hereby furtheIrl
amended by dele!ting said Section 22.402.2 in its en, iret y,
SEc-riON'TWO: That Chapter 22 entitled "Water, Sewer and Flood Plain Regulations"
ode of Mount Pro,Spect, as amended, is hereby further amended by
creating ArtiCle IX entitled "Cross on neC.'I'Liori s"; so that hereinafter said Article IX of
Chapter 22 shall be and read as follows,
CROSS CONNECTIONS
Sec. 22.901.
General Policy ,
Sec, 22.902,
rpose arid Application
Sec. 22„903,,
of
Sec. 22.904.
Water System
Sec. 22.905,
Cross Connections Prohibited
Sec, 220906.
Surveys andl Investigations
Sec, 22,907,
Where and When Protection is Required
Sec. 22.90&
Type of Protection Requred
Sec. 2Z909,
Backflow Prevention Devices
Sec. 22.910,
Booster Pumps
Sec. 22.911 „
Violations
Sec. 22.901. General Policy
A. The Director of Public Works and the Director of Inspection Services shall be
responsible for protection of the public water supply systern from contarnination
due to backflow or back siphonage of contaminants through the CUStMer's water
service connection, If, in accordance with the Illinois Plumbing Code, hereinafter
referred to as the "Code"", or in the judgment of the Director of Inspection Services
Chapter 22 ,
Page 2 of 14
or tl,,-)e ire tor o�f Public Wcrks, an approved backflow prevet')flon devicre, is
necessary for the safety of the public wateir supply, systern, notice wili; be givier) "to
the water custorner to install such ain approved device immediately. I Ihe water
custornei,, shi�all, at his/her own, expense�, instaill SUch an approved device at a
location and in a mannei, in accordan(.-,;e with the Code and ' allapplicce"3ble loc,al
regUations ar�d stiall have inspections and te.sts made Of SU,1'.,h ap� -,,,),ved device
upon installation and as reqi.rired by the Colde and this Article.
B, No person, firm or co rj)o ration shall estalbiTish or permit to be established or
rnairitain or permit to be rnaMtained any connection whereby a private, auxiliary or
emergency water supp�y other, tt,ian the regular public water SLJ �Y of the'Vill age
of Mount Prospect or dist,- ibution systeim of said, rnuriicipalily, unless st.,ich private,
Iriall 1,"iave becn
auxiliary oir emei� gency water sut p�y and use of such supp'y S
approved by the Diirrotor of erv�npecflon Services and the Directior of PL.111,7�',:C; \A10rIKS,
I
The rnethc�dof connE;66 ' on shall conform to the d rules anregula-ti ons of the Code.
a rrid shaH be approved Iby the Director of Insp6ction orwAhorized
representative(s).
C. It shall be thed,Uty of ti-ic. Director of Public Work's or repre.�.,,rr.t live (S)
to, cai.,i,,,e SLA"Ve.yS and investigatiorls to, be rn,,ri,,,Je of industrial,CoMffler,ciafl, and
thepr.,.operfies served by the" Pull"flic Water st,ipply to deterrnirie whether or not
actual or potentia! hazards to are. public water suj,".,,)ply may ex,,ist. Stich SU.rveys arr.l.
investigations shall be niade a matter of record and shall lbn:.re�_")eated at least
every two (2) years or as often as the Director of Public Workssha-fli deer'sn
riecessary. Corn ple tion of these surveys is rnandatory. Failuroto subm"t a
completed survey will 1,.)e considered a violation of this ordinaolice Will SUbjer"t
tVie oiffending consunier to a disconfinuation of water service, Roclords of Such
surveys all be Maintained l,")y lf'ie Viflage and available for review, forr a period of
at least five
D. If ordered by thia Director of Ir,,sp(..,,1cfion Soervices, any o,vvnE!lr of by
of
a Corlinanti or"i to the put)lic water supply or distribu_,ifion systiern tiie Villagr
MOUnt Pros,,,,dl:-)ct shall pr(ure the services of a licensed conVol
devi,,,'.,e inspe,)c"Uor for' the purpose of ver-Ifyii-ig the presence or of cross
connections, and that the [)irest (,,:�r of Sie,.rvices or authocr �'
have the right to, request entry at any rerasonable firne to any prope11,y served by
a connection to the public watersupply or distribution, systeni c.,F fllle Village of
Mount Prospect for the purpose of verifying iinformatiort SLJlbrnitte,�; by tp e
regarding the required cross -cru ;said i contr ol inspeecflon,Upon the
owrier, lesslees or occupants of any propetly so served shall furnish to the Director
of Inspection Services any inforniation iregarding the plpir,r,g syste.t'r'�, or systerns or
water use on siich pro pei t, . ,.The refused Oaf SUCh inn Orn'llatilorl, wl ien demanded,
st'.Iafli within the discr�,,�Uon 'Y of the Director of linspection Services, be deemed
evidence of the preser°e of -;,ross corinections, as provided in this Article.
E. The Director of Inspection Sel-ViCes, Ofit� je,� Village ofMount is here!�.y
authori.,,,:,,ed to direct and request the Dir(�,;c;Aor of PUblic'Works to dis],^Ilontirlue, and
the Director Of PUblic Wocks 's authorizeri to d1scontinue, a'Fter r)Ie notice
to the occupant and/'or owner thereof, the water service to any property wherein
any conne(.1ion in violation o-' tlr�e pr,*ovisions of this Article is known to �xist, and
to take such ott"ier precautionary nieasiures deernnecessary to eflmina�81
danger of corut aniilnafion of the public -water SUpply distribution mains. Water
Chapter 22
Page 3 of 14,
service to such property shall not be restored until such condlitions have been
eliminated or corrected in compliance with the provisions of this Article. Immediate
disconnection with verbal notice can be effected when the Director of Inspection
Services or the Director of Puiblic Works is assured that imminent danger of
harmful contamination of the public water supply system its, Such action all
be followed by written notification of the cause of disconnection. Immediate
disconnection without notice to any party can be e" Feet to prevent actual or
anticipated contamincation or pollution of the public water supply, provided that, in
the reasonable opinion of the Director of Inspection Services, or the Director of
Public Works or authorized agent(s), such action is required to prevent aCtUal or
potential contamination or pollution of the public water supply. Neither the Village,
its Director of Inspection Services, Director of Public Works, nor its agents or
assigns shall be liable to any customer for any injury, damages or lost revenues
which may result from termination of said customer's water supply in accoFdankce
with the terms of this Article, whether or not said terriiii-,jation was with or without
notice.
F A backflow prevention device approved by the Director, of Insper.,tion Services, or
authorized representative(s), shall be installed on all servicecoririectin s to the
Village water" 'Supply at a location and in a manne"r in accordance with the Code
and all applicable local regulations and shall have inspeoLions and tests made of
such approved device upon installation and as required by the Code and this
Article.
Sec. 22.902. Purpose and Application
A. P9r
rn Se. The purpose of this Article and cross -connection control program is:1
To protect the pUblic water supply system frorn contamination or pollution
by isolating, within the customergs water system, contaminants or pollutants
which Could backflow through the service connection into the public water
supply system.
2. To promote the elimination or control of existing cross connections, actual
or potential, between the public or consumer's potable wat systern and
nonpotable water systems, plumbing fixtures and sources or systems
containing substances of unknown or questionable safety,
3. To provide for the maintenance of a continuing program of cross -connection
control which will prevent the contamination or pollution of the public and
consumer's potable water systems.
B. 6gplication, Provisions of this Article shall apply to all premises served by tl�l
publi c potable water supply system of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Sec. 22.903. Definftions.
A. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this
Article:
AGENCY: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
qjeqjo ppoo e jo
e ol aoualsqns AujUOLt
Uedwi
go.ue.ijue Aq jolem aqj ;o AI!IP.,nb aql JO uv
'NOliVNINV-LNOO
SAS j@lem sjaujoIsno e aq, o
p.o,jap!suoo s,l ij,,I,,,sAs OuqUffild 6uipl!nq V -sasiwwd
Q Luc),11st)o gq,l uo pjeool walsAs jalem AuV
n S N 0 0
,wE)l,sAs jolem oqqnd e ol pajoeuuoo
jauuaw Aue ui jo Aq pailddns sespaid he
jo p.iluoo ui uosiad jo upipolsnio poigo gumo a
�misno jo �DVNnSNOO
-wolsAs
jolem ca�qejod eqj q el!s e le ls�xa ol ainssaid
opaqdsowle-qns e sasneo qoiqm ainssaid walsAs
Ul uoijonpaj -P, ujoj; sj.jnF;aj jeqj mopoeq P, wjo.1 V
-Moj�
je.�JJJOU 9qj ;0 IleSJOAGJ e lasneo ol p�jaj
jo fasneo lino' /A iAollqm uoijAja psuoo jo juiod ONT ;6
,J'o,mm @;qp"'orj p oinssaid Al,ddns Gt�j ONDqc
0 1 1
6uudid wpojlsumop ,),ql ui ainssaid jo UOti GlG AU'V
'f%,.')UGC'V U011P9IOJd JEJUGUIMIAUD.- SIOU�Jjj -9�41
pue epoo r,,�;qwnlid si(.)ullll Gq.l JO SPJePuels ELu
4snui siouifil it UO1A@jd molpoeq joj pasn saom-r)p
fl V 'LU- .,,"GAS J,,,9jetA -,,,�Iqejod e olui moj,��.oeq JU9AraJC4 01
- 1 11
p,G,puajLji uolioni4suco jo edAl jo 'poq;aw 'a/,)IA@p ALJV NOliN7-3A-IZJJ AAO-1-1)�OVO
Alddns joleAA elqplod roqj jo aoinos popual u �
8141 LIP141 J9(,1IO �:-,:1-,,)jnos Auge wail !.,UalsAs ica;em
al(jejod P, jo sed!d uoilnq!jlsip Oqj OJUI SOOLIP.1sqns
jo 'sain;xp 'Ispnbij je)qjo jo,jolem �o /,Ao�j e.L4j-
'IOJIUOO. eAeL4 JOU so op joA@Ajnd jo;emE)LjJ L,Dlqm
,J 0-- A Owo--i,�-)Asjo gainos jalem, e a;n;jjst,.joo jo aloeuoil
lqo jo p,,jpuiujuoo jo palnllod aq key sjalem
po.-sn jo 'spn� ss000id jo 'su.jeoils
jo gsa�jej sjjamsp, i4ons E)ojnos e UJOJI JOIEM
jo we;sAs Aiddns -ia;em o�jqnd s,ioAoAjnd jaqjoue
woil jo-lem apnioui Am scale m Ajeil!xnp, as,-:)qi
-wa,sh at4l Aq paiiddns jolem aqj sapnioui pue
u,,�,-�isAs Alddris jalem oijqnd aqj ueql jaqjo sasp-.3id
;'A41 01 "�q6j!UAe JO UO uialsAs jo aoinos jolem, Auv
'LJOfj8punoj uoijej!ueS
F,-',`-JOR2N @Ljj Aq pa! ili-o jo ajnj!jsu� spipapuelS
lau011"N UEOP,9WV U05810OF6V S�JOAA JOIP-,AA
uEnliquiv #sja,9ul6u3 AAL-41_jes alels ;o u011eloossv
opop,!SJOAlun aqi ;o loiluo:D
UOI'jOO.UUOO-SSOJO jo; uoil,epunOj Ll--)JeOSO�j at,41 Aq
PeAOJ(,)'de SPOL419W JO SGOIAGP UCIIUGAajd mopoeg
isAs -iivm /��ivriixnv
,ja:
Chapter 22 -
Page 5 of 14
CROSS CONNECTION: Any physical connection or arrangement between
two otherwise separe piping systerns, one of which
contains potable water and the other a substance of
unknown or questioncable safety or quality, whereby
there may be a flow from one system into the othel,".
CROSS CONNECTION Any person certified by theAgency ll-�o IS
A'.
CONTROL DEVICE responsible for irispecting eros s.-conneck0"'i control
INSPECTOR- devices.
DIRECT CROSS- A cross connection formed when a watersyste)m, is
CONNECTION* physically joined to a source of unknown or unsafe substance,
DOUBLE CHECK VALVE An assembly composed of single, indepre,,n,-.,'Jarltly
ASSEMBLY: acting check valves approv'��,J undc�,Ir)E Sta-.nd�,"Ird
1015. A dou.ble check valve assembly must in(..-,'11ude
tight shutoff valves, Io ,-jt: at each, erid of the
assembly and suitable connections for the
water tightness of check valve.
FIXED PROPER AIR GAP:
The unobstrUcted vertical distance thrOLV h tai free
atmosphere between the water dischar gif) point and
the flood level rirn of the receptacle.
HEALTH HAZARD.,
Any condition, device or practice in a wat,,,7�,r systern
oI . ii
r its operation resuilting from a real or
danger to the heaflth and well being of con Is, unn ers.
The word "severe" as used'to qualify "health hazard"
rneans a hazard to the health of the usWrth;at coufld
be expected tio res�ult in death or significant reduction
in the quality of life,
INDIRECT CROSS-
A cross conr-nectfon tin r"').ugh which an unkno',,/vri
CONNECTION:
substance can be forced, drawn by vacluuari or
otherwise introduced inIto a safe potabe water
system.
INSPECTION,
A plumbing inspection to examine carefully and
critically all materials, fixtures, piping and
appurtenances, appliances and installations of a
plumbing system for compliance with requirements of
the Illinois Plumbing Code and Illinois Administrative
Code.
NONPOTABLE WATER.-
Water not safe for drinking, personal or culinary use,
as determined by the requirements of Illinois
Administrative Code,
Chapte,l- 22
Page 6 of 14
PLUMBING.-
The actual installatiorl, repair, maintenance,
alteration or extension of a plumbing system by any
-person,. Plumbing includes all piping, fixtures,
appurtenances and app�iiances for a supply of water
for aH purpo�ses, including, withoUt lirnitation, lawn
sprinkler systems, from the sour c.,,�Z7,; of a privatie, water
sul.-iply, on the premises or from the main in the
street, alley or, at the CUrb to, within and abOUt any
building or buildings where pe.ople live, work or
asSernbie. Plumbing in('_',.Iudes all piping, frorn
discharge of purnping units tc,.) and including pressure
tanks in water supply systerns. Plumbing includes all
P�p'lng, fiXtUres, appUrtenances, and appliances -for a.
bui'ding drcain and a smilt ary dr.qinage and related
ventilation system of any buH:. j or buildings where
PE.10ple live, work or assemblea, frorn tIw,e point of
connection of such building drain to the building
sevver or private sewcage disposcal systelm, five feet
beyond the foundation walls.
POLLUTON""
The presence of any foreigil substance (organic.,
ino,ganic, radiological, or biologicaa) in water that
tends to degrade its quality so as to constitute a
hazzard or impair the usefulness of the water.
POTABL.E WATER,
Water which meets the reqi,dreme7nts of MI not
Adrninistrive, Code for drinking, c(.,fliriary arid domestic
purposes.
POTENTWL- CROSS
A f xture or appurtenance with threaded hose
CONNEC'"HON,
connection, tapered SPOUt, or other conriec.flon ichi
w(j-jld 'facilitate extension of the wat-, supply line
bend its legal terri,gination point.
PROCESS FLUID(S):
or solution which may be, cher,J�11-,ally
Any, -fluid j
biologically or otherrwise contarninated or polluted in
a form or concentration s,,.,jch aS WOUld constitute a
health, POIIUtiona�, or systern hazal-d if introduced
into the public or a conSUrner's pot water system,
This inCkides, bUt is not HmilLed to'.
Chapter 22 ,
Page 7 of 14
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY, All mains, pipes and structures through which wat
is obtained and distributed to the public, including
wells and well structures, intakes and cribs, PLAmping
stations, treatment plants, reservoirs,tori ge% tanks
and appuntenances, collectively or sleverally, actually
used or intended for use for the pu"rpose of
furnishing water for drinking or general domaStiC Use
and which serve at least 15 service connections or
which regularly serve at least 25 persons at least 60
days per year. A public wate, r supply is either a
C
community water supply" or a noncorni,� iunit y water
supply."
REDUCED -PRESSURE
A device containing a minimurn of two indx--0end ently
PRINCIPLE BACKFLOW
acting c[ieck valves togeth;i" wlth an au tor(i ati (,ally
PREVENTION DEVICE,
operating pressure differential relief valve, located
between the two l' it valves and2,pp�-OVE.%dI Under
ASSE Standard 1013. During normal flow and at the
cessation of norrnal flow, the pressure biatvv,r,.�,en
these two checks shall be less than the supply pres -
Sere. In case of leakage,of either check valve, the
differential relief valve, by dischargirig to tt"ie atmo-
sphere, shall operate to maintain the pressure
between the check valves at less than the supply
pressure. The unit must include tightly closing shutoff
valves located at each end of the. device, and eacltl
device shall be fitted with properly located test cocks.
SERVICE CONN EC-'NITION:
The opening, including all fittings and appurtenances,
at the water rnain through which water, is supplied to
the user including, but not limited to, all domestic
and fire services.
SURVEY.,
The collection of information pertaining to a
customar's piping system regarding the location of all
connections to the public water supply system and
must include the location, type and most recent
inspection and testing date of all cross-connc-C.;`(ion
control devices and methods located within that
custorner's piping system, The survey must be in
written form and should not be an actual plumbing
inspection.
SYSTEM HAZARD:
A condition through which an aesthetically
objectionable or degrading material not dangerous to
heaIt h may enter the public water supply system or a
consumer's potable water system,
USED WATER:
Any water supplied by a public water supply system
to a consumer's water system after it has passed
through the service connection and is no longer
under the control of the water supply official
custodian,
Chapter 22
Page 8 of 14
WATER PURVEYOR' The owner or official custodian of a public water
system
Set,.. 22.904. Water S�ste;
Y
A. The water et re shal!be considered as made up of two parts, the public wa1.-,ez,.,r
supply system nm-nd th,� conSU-Iier's water systern,
B. The public water, supply sys-em shall consist of the source facilitieZ,,3 and the
distribution system and shall include all those facilities of t L'ab!e wateAr system
under the contr,.-)l of the Vill of Mount Prospect up to the pointwhe,,I-e ti -le
consurner's wat system begirns.
'The source shall all comone ntsof the facilifie)s utflizrTl in the production,
treatment, slums g,<a, at'id de"ivery of water to the pubiic water dilstributior� sy� i"('I.
D. The public water SLAP l' distribUflon stern shall include the network, of coridLAS
used to deliver water from the source to the conSUmer's mat -)r systern.
E, The cor',iSUirner's viia r systern shall include all pair ts of the facilities bekyon, th e
serviCe corine3ction used to convey water fi orn the public watr'-!r suppl, distrib4-.Uion
�systern to points of use, In all water supply strUCtUreS on the con.S%U yr,j
side of the B box or shut-off valve, This includes tl-ie consurner's water supply
structures is may be situated in the public right-of-way or diesignated
easernent.
Sec . 22,90 5. Cross Connect-toris Prohibited.
A. Corinections be,.11\ve�an potaL-)1e water systerns and other systernsor eqLJ�,.:)m�emt
containing v,,,,atnr or substarr.-o�es of urikr)ovVn oir questionable quaire pro�i-)ibit,-,L-,Id
except when and Whnre approlved cross -connection coritrol devices or rnethe,',)ds are
peralion on a conflnu`m'- basis.
installe,d, tested and mainta'ned to insure proper o
physical connectiorii shall be permitted between the potable portior"i of a SUPPI"J
and any other water not of equral or better and
quality, as deterned �-riiIDy, ins,pection and analysis by V -W,, Dirc:,,ctor of In,
Services.
CThere shall be no arrangement or connection by which an unsafe substance may
eniter a supply. I
Sec. 22-906. Surveys and Invest'ications.
iW
A. The Director of Putflic Work-> shall circulate, a cross -connection Control device
survey to all consurners with a potential risk of backflow or back pressure to the
Village potable water supply. This survey shall be completed by the property
o7 r or conSUrner at tl,,ie premises served and returned to the Public Works
Depaftrn�,-�,nt wit' iin 30 da�, s of the date Of iSSUe, Failure to submit a cornpleted
survey All subject thea property owner or, consumer to the penalties outlined in
Section 22.911.
B. 1-11e consurner
if ordered by the Dire cto,r of Inspection Services or authorized
representative, shall procure the services of an approved cross- corune cLion control
r; %
��hapter 22
PaX111 11
ge 9 of 14
device inspalictor for the inspection of the presence or absence of crooss
connections within the consurnor" s premises and for testing, repair and
maintenance of cross -connection control devices within the consurn.ar's premises,
and the consumer shall be responsible for all costs related V"iereto.
C. On request by the Director of Inspection Servicess,, or authorized represesntative, the'
consumer shall furnish information regarding the pipinystern or syst)rns or water
use within the customer's premises, The consumer's premises shall be open ' at
aIl reasonable times to the Director of Inspection Services or authoriz " 'J
represe ntative fort e verification of information submitted by the consumer to the
publicgator
Supply
custodian regarding cross -connection inspt--.ction results.
D. It shall be the responsibility of the water consumer to arrange periodic. si,)-r-veys of
water use practices on his/her premises to determine whether or not there are
actual or potential cross connections to his/her wc,.-4-ler systelrri through whici"'I
contaminants or pollutants could backfiow into his/her or the PL,At.,)Nc potable
systern, All cross -connection control or other, plumbing inspections must be
conducted in accordance with 225 ILLS 320/32 as revised,
E. It is the responsibility of the water consumer to prevent back'flow into trIle public
water sy toamn by enSUring that:
1. All cross connections are removed, or approved cross -connect -ion control
devices are installed for control of backflow and back sipl-,ionagge,.
2n ross-tConnection control devices shall be installed in accordance with the
manufacturer's instructions.
3. Cross -connection control devices shall be inspected at the firne of
installation and at least annually by a person certified by the Agency as a
#_ "I O
cross -Connection control device inspector (CCCDI), The in specti,Jf X � 'I
mechanical devices seal/ include physical testing in aCcorda1,K-.,,e with the
mai"Macturer's instructions,
1�. Testing and Records
a) It shall be the duty of the consumer, at any premises, on which
ac ,floes prevention devices required by these. regUlatJons are
installed, to have inspections, tests, maintenance, and repairs made
in accordance with the schedules noted in these regUIPtions. Each
device shall be tested at the time of installation and annually or more
frequently if recommended by the manufacturer.
b) A copy of all testing reports must be submitted to the Director of
Inspection Services within ten (10) working days of the installation.
The test results for recertification must be submitted tot Director
of Inspection Services within ten (10) working days of the required
renewal date, The date and time of the test,name. and license
number of cross -connection control device inspector, and test
results must be listed on each report,
Chapter 22
Page 10 of 14
C) DouNe cl"ieckl valive assemblies shall be inspected and tested a' firne
�red service
of installation and annually thereafte�,, and' requi
performed w1th9n fifteen (15) days.
d) RedUced-pressure principle backflow prevention asseiirVios sha ' '�l be
tested cqt the time of installation and a.-nnually or rnore fr(:,,A,qLJrz,,,n'LJY if
V ce" r - i -
recornmended by -the manufacttirer, and reqLlir(.�d S es shall Ibe
perforrned wifl-Jr five (5) days.
e) Testing shraH be performed by a person M'io has 'been c�:w,�rtified by
the Agency, as competent to service the device. R-oo -f of approval
shall be in wr� flng.
Records s�_rnitted to tlieViHa, ge water supply shall be cava il,-il.-)'Oe, for
inspeC-4ion by Agency personroel in c.1rd with 415 ILLS 5/4.
g) Each device shall have a tag attathe dfisJi,ng the date of rnost recent
test, narne, of CCCE)I, and type and date of repairs,.
h) Menever bac� f"o\A(prevention devices required by these
are found to be defective, they shall be reppIred or replac� d at the
expense if the consiumer without d6ay.
i) Backflow prevention devices shall not be bypassed, made
inoperative, removed, or otherwise made ineffective without specific
authorizatiot-i by the Director of Imspection Services.
A maintenanct, iog shall be mairitained and in�,,;'Iude*
date of e,ach test
name a n d C C CM l ce n s e. n LA M'() e r, o f p e rs o n (s) p e17,, rr'n i n g the
to st
test resuNts
firer fire or slervicing rr IU'ired
repairs a -id, date competor.]
servicepetrforrried ai,"id date con-q)leted
Sec. 22.907. Where and Whan Protection is Required
AAn approved backflow device shall be installed on all connections to t he public
water supply, as described lei the Illinois IUM in Code, Illinois Administ'rative
Code and the Agency's regulations. In addition, an approved backflow prevention
device shall be installed on ec-ch service line to a consumer's water system serving
prernises, where, in the ju6,, n-ient of the Director of Inspection Services, or the
Diret
ctor of Public Works, of Heir' authorized representative(s), Ct al or potential
hazards to the public water supply systern exist.
B. If ordered by the Director of Inspection Services, the water customer at s�Ject
premises shall Jinstall, test, and subrnit a copy of said test results 'to tlie Director
of Inspecti(wi, services within sixty (60) days of being so ordered unleszs; the Director
Chapter 22
Page 11 of 14
of Inspection Services or the Director of Public Works or their authorized
representatives determine that the nature of the threat to the public potable water
supply requires more timely compliance.
C. An approved backflow prevention dtalvice shall be installed on each service line- to
a consurn er's water system including, but not limited to, situations where the
following conditions exist:
1. Premises having an auxiliary water supply, unless such auxiliary supply is
accepted as an additional source by the Director of Inspection Sel-Vices.
Z Premises on which any sir stn is handled which can creal:cs, an aCtLlal
or potential hazard to the public water supply system, This sli"ia-ill include
pre'mi havingsources or systems containing process fluids or W2tc-,lrs
,originating from the public water supply system which are no longer undal,�'r
the sanitary control of the Director of Public Works.
3. Premises having internal cross conneCtions tt'-iat, in the judo r-) of ttr
Director of Inspection Services or a cross-connecoon control device.
Y -q, - - -
inspector, are nnog.correct a ble or that have intricate plumbing arra., 1JR! �Ot' �' II i L "3
1.
which make it impractical to determwnnn
ine hether or root cross co1."-'1C,'UOJiG
exist.
44 Premises where, because of security requirements or other prohibitions or
restrictions, it is impossible orimpractical to make a complete cross -
connection survey.
5. Prise s having a repeated history of cross connections being established
or reestablished.
D. An approved backflow device shall be installed on all connelotions to the P�'A')!ic,
wate,r supply as described in the Plumbing Code, 77 Ill. Adrn. Code 890 arid the
Agency's reg ulat"lons 35 111. Adm. Code 653. In addition, an approvcd
prevention device shall be installed on each service line to a consumers
sys'.e.m serving, but not necE;ssarily limited to, the following types of facilifies,
unk:.-).ssj the Director of Inspection Services determines that no actual potential
hazard to the public water supply system exists,
1 . Hospitals, mortuaries, clinics, nursing homes.
2. Laboratories,
3. Piers, docks, waterfront facilities,
4. Sewage treatment plants, s.ewage pumping stations or storm water
purnping stations,
5. Food or beverage processing plants,
6. Chemical plants.
7. Metal plating industries.
8. Petroleum processing or storage plants,
9. Radioactive material processing plants or nuclear reactors,
10 r washes.
11, Pesticide, or herbicide, or extermination plants and trucks.
12. Farm service and fertilizer plants and trucks.
Chapter 22,
Page 12 of 14
Sec. 22.908'. "rype of Protection Reqt.fired.
A. The type of protection it fired under Sections 22,907.0.1, 22,9017,C.2, and and
22.907.Cw3 of these regulatiorls shall depend on the degree of hazr_)rd which exists
as fOHOWS..
An approved, fixed, proper air gap separation shaH be installed where the
public water supply systern ma,y be contia�minated witu') substances that
could cause a severe health hazard.
2. An approved, fixe'd, propeir air gap separation, or an approved, reduced -
pressure prj,Iciple, backflow prevention ass� rnbly shall be instaHed whee
the Public, water supply systorr) may be, rotary in wit'ri a substbince that
could caUse a systern or t"i ealth hazard.
3. Ari approv6d fixed, proper air gapseparassembly flon, or C n approved, reduced -
E'.' check valve
pressure prk-iciple, backfiow prevention aor dOL�bl
asserribly s["iaH be instaHed vv'heire PLANic wat& supply sys"'el"n niay be
po'�`Iuted with subistances that COUld UlUse a poll tAtio ri hazaic.' not d'a%,e-rous
to h ealt
B, The, typE` C)f reClUiread under 22,9�,N`�C.4 22,�i��r,7,"7,C-
� 5
re ro v, g U 1<a Ui 0 'Ch be an apipr,;.,'ived, fixe,�d, priloa e d pel"'
. . . . . . ) ZO ci'
redUsed- prelc;SUre principle, La(1%1.kf1ow pu',,ivention devk�e,
C. Whre a publilic water supply or an auxiiiary water suppily is used for a fire
tEDIM, redLJ(DEr`,'d -,pre ssu principle backflow preventer's shall
prutec'ion sys
jrjst8jjer,,,; on firi safety syi,tet,,,js cctr uniA,.wctl,,"'�I,d to the public water supply under the
following condItions"
1Whi the fire saf,7,','y systerri contains antil"reeze, fire ret,,'.irdar""it, or,oVl'),er
c h e, rn i c al S
2, When water is purnped into tt")e systern from anotherSOUI`C-"�-
3u Whein wrnter flows by, gravity from a noinpota,"Dile source; or mdien watehr can
be purn,,_.ied into the fire safety system from another SOU-1ce,
4. When there is a cor"mn�-Dctjon Mierelby another source can be, connected to
the firs safety systelm.
D. Any a1diflon or alteration to, an shall be i,'i,
with the appropriate design, sta rlicl;a, rid for tl")e cyst c rn,, If t�he addition, of a backflow
prevention device decreases the water pressure beloiwttie pressure for
the fire safety system, addiNiflonal mecasures stiall be taken in, eacit"h case to
",hanical mearis (i.e., a
restore the pressure to the operating pevel requirEA by rneika
fire PUMP).
E. Before a backflow preventicn device is installed ref.'roacflvc;',,1y on a fire spnnkler
systern, a thoroug�,'i hydraulic, analysis si be p(,--.1wrformed including'.
Revised hydra -Vic capC,Lflatiores for hydraulically cajcul,,-.�,lted systerns in
accordance with NFPIA 130 13R, or 13D. &ubrnitN,'�d 0,;
shp �rn� p t � m° � ould
include the pressure loss anticipialLed through the backfilow prevention
,device,
Chapter 22
Page 13 of 14
2. Revised sprinkler system demand for,pipe s.,,.hedule systems.
3. Current water, supply data based on a water supply test, including a
comparison assuring that any additional pipe ler the or fittings necessary
to accommodate the proper installation of the backflow prevention device
will not increase the sprinkler system dernand beyond the available water
supply and,
4. All necessary modifications contributing to the additional friction loss,
These itenis, including a manufacturer's data sheet Indicating the expect4E.�]
pressure loss, must be submitted to the Fire Department Fire Prevention Bureau
prior to the installation of the backflow prevention asserribly,
Sec. 22,,909. Backfiow Prever"i"tiol'i Devices.
A. All backflow prevention dev'',ces or methods required by these rUles,,' and regi.,flation',
shall be approved by the Real-ch Foundation for Cross -Connection Control of tlie
University of Southern Califorriia,Arynerican Water Works Association, An"ierican
Society of Sanitary E,�g'jneBring, or American National Standards InstitUtO., or
certified by the National Sanitation Foundation to be in compiianc,'-,'. with alOplicat'),e
indUstry specifications.
B. Installation of approved devices shall be made in accordance with 35 111. Adm.
Code 653,802, and only as specified by the Research Foundation for Cross -
Connection Control of the University of Southern California, or applicable indusl[,ry
specifications. Maintenance, as recort'imencied by the man ufa%cturer of the dvjce,
shall be performed. Manufs"aicturer's maintenance manual shall be. availablia on's'ite.
Sec. 22.910. Boo,' -ter
t
X Where a booster pump has beem, installed on the service line to or within any
premises, such puryip shall be equipped with a low-pressurt,.it-off di.:wk,/-a
designed to shut off the booster pump when the pressure in the service line on thE,01
suction side of the pump drops to 20 psi or less,
B, It shall be the duty of the water consumer to maintain the low -pre., S Us, re cut-off
,
device in proper working order and to certify to the Director of Inspection Servir,;es,
at least once a year, that the device is operable.
Sec. 22.911. Violations.
A. The Director of Inspection Services shall request or direct the Director of Public
Works to deny or discontinue, after reasonable notice to the occupants and ownars
thereof, the water service to any premises wherein any backflow prevention device
required by these regulations is not installed, tested, maintained, and repaired In
a mariner acceptable to the Director of Inspection Services, or if it is found that the
backflow prevention device has be(, -)n removed or bypassed, or if an unprotec!ed
cross connection exists on the premises, or if a low pressure cut off required by
this Article is not installed and maintained in working order.
B. Water service to such prernIses shall not be restored until the consumer has
corrected or eliminated such conditions or defects in con forrnance with this Article
Chapter 22
Page 14 of 14
and to the satisfaction of the Director of Inspection Services and until a
reconnection fee of fifty dollars ($50,00), for expenses incurred disconnecting and
reconnecting the water service, is paid to the Village of Mount Prospect. This fee
must be paid in addition to any other fines described in Section 22.91 1.D of this
Article.
C. The cor'isurner respw isible for back siplioned or bac' K pressure�,J rnaterial or
coritarninatism through back flOW 11OUst bear t['ie cost of clean ul'.') of the potable
wate,' supply systern and shall be totally liahle for all cla'lrins that rnay result froifTi
such incident s if contarnination of the potalble',lvvater supply system occurs thriough
an illegal cross connecfioo�-i or an improperly installed, rriainta4"ied or ref:)aired
device, or a device which tias beeri bypassed.
D. Ariy person, fira"i or corpo ratio n wl-iio/,�Ath'ich violatec.;, disobeys, omits, neg�ects, or
resists enforcerneint of any of the provisior'-�s of this Article s,l,-iall be fined riot less
than one hundred dollars ($100. 00) nor n'iore that five hundred doll,,, rs ($500.00)
.f
for�acl"„i offense,1 and each day tjpoj,,i vvf"flch such a vio!ation confinues shall
constitute a separate offense. to
SE%"'.*"OTION 'PnO, `Ftfls Ordiriance s[icafli be il[I fUll force ar'iid effec-ft frorn arid after its
passage, app iroval and pt.,iblicaflor in forn'i it i the �rTiar'ir'ier pt-"ovided by Iaml.
AYES -
NAYS'.
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of . . . ....... 1994.
Ge�ald Farley
Village President
. . ......... A-, ......... . . .. ',"-F-i-e-1 d"' -s" . . . ...................... . . . ...... . . .. ...... . . ....... . . ..... .
Village Derk
CAF/
81101/94
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF CHAPTER 22
V Q
ILL
A PRP
F 'T
,CODE 0 MONj,,,OS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECM!QN ON_E.; That Section 22.504.2 "Water Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto a
new paragraph H; so that hereinafter said Section 22.504.2 shall include the following: .
H. Nothing in this Chapter shall prohibit the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village from entering into an Intergovernmental Agreement to sell water to a
governmental entity. The rate for water to be sold by the Village to a
governmental entity shall be specified in the Intergovernmental Agreement.
aEg.TQN TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
CAF/
8110/94
ORDINANCE NO.
i-rA 0 % W
. . ........ .........
A
§jE,PII0N QNE., That paragraph H of Section 4.103 entitled "Powers and Duties" of
Chapter 4 "Appointive Village Officials" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as
amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety and substituting the following; so
that hereinafter said paragraph H of Section 4.103 shall be and read as follows:
H. To negotiate, award contracts for and purchase all materials, supplies and
equipment for which funds are provided in the annual budget. All contracts for
public works or improvements which are not be paid for in whole or in part by
special assessment or special taxation when the expense thereof exceeds ten
thousand dollars ($10,000.00), and, except as provided below, all purchase
orders or contracts for labor, materials, equipment or supplies involving
amounts in excess of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) made by or on behalf
of the Village shall be awarded to the lowest qualified bidder pursuant to due
advertisement for sealed bids in a newspaper published and having a general
circulation within the Village (which advertisement shall state that such contract
shall be let to the lowest responsible bidder, that the right is reserved in the
Village Board to reject all bids or waive bid technicalities and the place, time
and date when sealed bids shall be opened; said date being not less than 7
days after publication of the advertisement), after the successful bid proposal
has been submitted to the Village Board for approval.
1. Should any purchase be of any amount in excess of that provided in the
annual budget or should the low bidder for a contract let through
competitive bidding fail to be the lowest responsible bidder, the Village
Manager shall advise the Village Board of Trustees as to whether or not
the contract offered is desirable or which of several contracts offered is
most desirable for the Village.
2. In case of accidents or other circumstances creating an emergency, the
Village Manager may award contracts, acquire services and make
purchases for the purpose of repairing damages caused by the said
accident or meeting said public emergency; but he shall file promptly
within fourteen (14) days with the Village Board a report showing such
emergency and the necessity of such action, together with an itemized
account of all expenditures.
3. Nothing herein shall limit or prevent the Board of Trustees, upon its
extraordinary vote as set forth in subsection 2.201.C.5 of this Code from
waiving the requirement of advertising for bids with respect to contracts
for services of individuals possessing a high degree of professional skill
where the ability of fitness of the individual plays an important part, or
contracts for the purchase of materials, supplies and equipment or any
work or other public improvement which in the opinion of said Trustees,
there is a sole supplier, or a need for standardization of existing
equipment, or the bidding procedure is impractical due to the nature of
the equipment or work, the difficulty of developing specifications, or when
time is of the essence.
Chapter 4
Page 2 of 2
4. Competitive bidding shall not be required for any contract involving
amounts less than ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) or when the Village
exercises the option of purchasing with the State of Illinois or other
governmental unit (as authorized under 30 ILCS 525/1. et se or when
,the Village pursuant to its home rule powers enters into a joint
purchasing contract for materials, supplies or equipment with another
entity which has conducted competitive bidding for such materials,
supplies or equipment."
SE,.QTION That all Ordinances and Resolutions, or parts thereof which- are in
conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are, to the extent of such conflict,
expressly repealed.
SECTION THREE* That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ...Nol 1994.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHkPTF-R 4 OF TAE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT r-noepRCT
BE IT ORDAINMD BY THE PRESIDENT AND B0PXw.D GV mj.RUS7EZS OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, IT-iJIVOIS:
CTIONLONE. That Article V Df the Chapter 4 "Appointive Village
Officers) of the Village Code of Mo P-roapect,, as amended, be
further amended by deleting SeCtion 4.504.Tj in its entirety and
1*
inserting in lieu thereof the following two new subsect ione:
"L. To negotiate and .contract for the sale of personal
property owned by the Village when in the reasonable
discretion of the Finance Director such personal property is
no longer necessary or 'aaelful to the Village and the market
value of such personal property does not exceed one hundred
dollars ($100.00). Pursuant to the Villagwo home rule
powers, all personal property, of the Village with a market,
value less than one hundred dollars ($100.00) may be sold at
the discretion of the Pinance Director wits ,out V*,I,laqe Board
X
approval. Al * I other eales of personal property shall
recpaire the
approval Of a m&J'OrItV of the corporate
authorities oftheVillage,
M. To perform such duties as may be required from time to
time by the Villaq* Manager.,,
,SECT That all ordinances �and reeolut� ' ono, or parts
thereof' which are in conflict with the provil'*ions
Ordinance are, to the ex,tellt of ouc,h 0011f, .6sof this
repealed . ict , exprewsly
r
That this Ordinance shal.1 be in full force and
eff8ct from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law,
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of If 1994
Gerald L.
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A—.—Fie -l"ds
Village Clerk
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUMcrrY um
TO: village Manager prtw�l
FROM: Director Public Works it"
4
DATE: August 11, 1994 t 1
SUBJ: Bid Results - Shade Tree Planting
On August 91 1994, sealed bids were opened for the provision
and installation of parkway trees. Bid prices were sought for
2-1/2" trees for our Cost Share planting program, 1-1/2" trees
for reforestation, and larger trees for accident replacements on
an as needed basis. Bid tabulations are shown on Attachment A.
Attachment B shows the species and sizes that we propose to
order. It must be noted that at this point we can only estimate
quantities since residents may select their choice of species.
There is a total of $71,250.00 in various tree planting accounts
in the 1993-94 budget: 1-071-08-6241 (p. 173) 1-071-08-6242 (p,
173), 1-071-08-6243 (p. 173) and 1-471-10-8718 (p. 175). Based
on unit costs and,estima.ted quantities, I recommend acceptance
of the low bid received from St. Aubin Nursery for 1-1/211 trees,
and the low bid received from Mike Greco Landscaping for 2-1/2"
trees. Total expenditures for combined purchases from both
bidders is not to exceed $71,250.00.
), dtx &At c��-ce A�L,
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
Attachments
SHADE94/FILES/BIDS
Attachment A
Bid Results - Shade Tree Planting
August 9, 1994
Substitutions
(A) 3-
(B) 2"
(C) Magyar
(0) Bowball
(E) 2"
(F) Straight species
(G) Ohio grown
Arthur
Garden
Serftid
Williamson Countryside
8C
St Aubin Mike Greco
Size
Species
Weiler, Inc.
Comer, Inc.
Nursery
NM Industries
Landscape
Nursery LandscapLbg
2...5""
Hedge Maple
210.00
-19480
179.00
2.5" Autumn Blaze Freeman Maple
180,00
192.00
194.00
189.80
147.00
2.6" Black Maple
188.00
(A) 277.00
240.00
185.t
184.76
155.00
2.5" ('#hmson, King Norway Maple
185.00
248.00
230.00,
275,00
196.00
179.80
149-00
Emerald Queen or
2.5"
Emerald Lustre Norway Ma le
150,00
180.00
205.00
210.00
178,00
163.00
147.80
146.00
21,,5"
Columnar Norway Maple
228.00
180-00 (G)
205.00
180.00
166.80
1-47 00
2.5"
Cleveland Norw!!y Ma, . ........
�Iq
180=
. . .
. . ............. .
240.00
235.00
179:80
14T00
ZS"
Globe Norway Maple
250,00 IG)
205.00
199.50 (D)
147.00
2,5""
Green Mountain Sugar Ma' le
190.00
210.00
200µ00
18440
160.00
ZS"'
Hackbegy
150.00,
219.00
180.00
185.00
160.00,
146.00
2,5"
Katsura Tree
190.00 J
-
269,,00 1
230.00,
1 96"0()JE)
212.00
135.00
2,5"
Turkish Filbert
302.00 1
200.00
297.00'�-
237.00
.
.....
260,00.......
2.5"
American Yallowwood
.......
200.00
290.00 1
240.00 1
260,00
Autumn Purple, Kleinburg,
2,5"
or Skyline White Ash .
170,000
238.00
210.001
214.00
180-001
159.80
150.00
Marshall, Summit or Patmore
2,5"
Green Ash
150.00
160 00
185.00
180.001
171.00
147.00
142.80
145.00
2.57
PumeXin Ash
2'80.00
2,5" Autumn Gold Gin o300.00
f(C)
432.00
2j"
Princeton ,Sen q Ginkgo_
300.00 j
287.00
315.00
2.5"
-SUline or S ademaster Hon2ylocust
170.00
213DO
ISO 00
'160-00;
163.00
142:80
148.00
2.5n
Sentinel CrabaRpLe
160.00
185.00
132.00
158.80
White Angel, Wyman, or Ormiston Roy
2,5" _,Crabapple
165.00
160.00
135.00
13200
139.80
140.00
2.5"
Ironwood
i 149.00
250.00
314,,00
197,00
2.5"
Macho Amur Corktree
I 237,00
200.00 (r-)
251.00
187.00
149.80 (F)
17&00
2,5"
Bradford or Autumn Blaze Pear
180.00
214.W
147.00
147-M,
2-6"
Sawtooth O ak
-
50.00
1
190.00
2.6' Northem Red Oak
i 259.00
280.00
290,00
205.00
185.00
2,5"
Fn fish Oak
175.001
259.00
250.00
298.00
170.00
164.80 '7
175.00
2.5"
11vory Silk Tree Lilac
220.00
192.00
183.00
208.80
230.00
2.5"'
Greens ire Littleleaf Linden
150,00 i
210.00
180.00
185.00
162.00
139.80
147.00
Z5"
Redmond Linden
150.001
210.00
180.00
178.00
160.00
139.80,
149.00
1„5"
Hedge Maple
130-00 (G)
135.00
102.90,
130.00
1,.5"
PuEpleblow Maple
130.00
108.80 j
1.5"
Black Alder
99.00
100.00
122.00
88.80 i
105.00
15"
Hackbefly
172.00
100.00
122.00
8118.80.11
120.00
1.5"
Turkish Filbert
220.00
130.00
158.00
119,90
1,5"Blue
Ash
110,00
251.00
113.90
1.5*
Auturnn Gold or Magyar Gin!Sqo
120.00
130.00
3113-00
118"80
145,00
Tull tree
115.00
208.00
130.00
118.00
9780
I'S"
Sentinel CrOap ipj �
80.00
100.00
107,00
97.80
120.00
I's", ironwood Ho hornbeam
198D0
130.00
190"00
113.80
1.5" Macho Amur Corktree
100.00
(Ell, 202.00
110.00
120.00
1.5*
Bradford or Autumn Blaze Pear
100.00
100.00
93.00
108,40
1,5' 'White Oak
190.00
190.00
147.80
1w5"
Northern Red Oak
115.00
189,00
190.00
110.00
112,,80
105.00
1, 5"
'Bur Oak
210.,00
190.00
190.00
129.80
120.00
If'
Chinkapin Oak
180.00
1 V
Ian lisp IOak
100,00
123.00
189,00,1,
180,00 I(G)
142.00
99.80
115.00
1.5"
Ivo ,ilk Tree Lilac
1X00
114,80
140.00
1.5"° -Silver Linden
110.00
130.00
114..00
140,,00
1.5-
Lacebark. Elm
10().00
180.00
134.00
4'
Crimson KinNqnnq!y_"a le
. ...................2-5660
407.007
440.00
554.00
3"
Nugar Maple
277.00 1
310.00
293.00
O&W
21aDo
4*l
Sugar Ma ie
11
400.00
388.00 1
440.00
519.00
405.00
64
Sugar Ma le
498.00 j_
600.00
643.00
3"
Greens ire Littleleaf Linden
210.00
253,00
250.00
264 00
219.80
190.00
4"'
Greenseire Littleleaf Linden
300 00
356,00
300.00
371,D0
336.80
290.00
5"
limens pire'Lit lefeaf,Unden
451.00
400.00
514D0
494,,00
4"'
Av tumn Pur le, KlainbuE9, or Skyline White Ash
1
395D0
3=00
371,00
429.80
3'
Marshall or Summit Green Ash
240,00
225,00
243.00
250.00
2%00
219.80
190.00
4"
Marshall or Summit Green Ash
300.00
299.00
323.00
300,00
342.00
294.80
220.00
5"Marshall
or Summit Green Ash
429.00
435.00
400,,00
500.00
389.80
3"
Skyline or Shademaster Hone locust
240.00
269.00
250.00
264.00
2,07.80
230.00
4"
Iline or Shademaster Ho
Sknalocust,,
35000
29900
421.00
300.00
392-00
366.80
420,001
S!SXline or Shademaster Hone locust
429.00
400.DO
571,00
496.80
3"'
Norway Ma le
216.00
258.00
250,00
293.00
217-80
-
4"'
Norway Ma le
330.,00
362.00
300,00
386.00
366.80
5"
NorwaX Ma le
429.00
443.00
400.00
571.00
. .....
488.80
3"
Bradford Pear
234.130
250.00
.
187.80
L_4!'
Bradford Pear
322.00
300.00
1300.001
385.001
298.80
Substitutions
(A) 3-
(B) 2"
(C) Magyar
(0) Bowball
(E) 2"
(F) Straight species
(G) Ohio grown
Attachment B
Estimated Quantities/Costs
2.5" Subtotal (Mike Greco) 54,750.00
1.5" Subtotal (St. Aubin)— 16,49,830
Total 711248-30
Budgeted 71,250-00
* - Partial total due to no bid items
Garden
Arthur
St Aubin
Mike Greco
BC
Berthold
Countryside
Williamson
Qty. Species
Comer, Inc.
Weiler, Inc. —
Nursery
Landscaping
Landscape
Nursery
Industries
Nursery
10 Hedge Maple
0.00
0.00
1,948.00
790.00
0.00
0.(�O
0.00
2,100.00
— — - --------
10 Autumn Blaze Maple
10
O"Oo
6. dco
1,898.00
1,,470.00,
1,940.00,
0.0---.
1,920.00,
1,800,0!
—nnnnnnn
TT Black Maple
0.00
3, 196.00,
3,140.75
2,635.00o.m
,1 45.00
4,709.001,
0.00
4,080.00
10 Crimson King Maple
0.00
1,850.00
1,798.00
1,4 0.001
1,960.00
2,480.006
2,750.00
2,300-00
TO —Emerald —Queen Ma-p—le
1,800.00
1,500.00
1,478.00
1,460.00
1,630.00
2,050.00 .
....... 1,780.00
2,100-00
10 Columnar Norway Maple
0.00
0.00
60
1,668.00
1,470.00'
1,R0.00
2,280.00
2,050.00�
1,800.00
10 Sugar Maple
1,900.00
0.00
1,848.00
1,600.00
0.00
0.00
2,000.00
2,100.00
10 HackberTy
0.00
1,500.00
0.00
1,460.00
1,600.00
2,190.001
1,850.00;
1,800.00
20 Turkish Filbert
-
0.00,
0.00
0.00
5,200-00
4,740.00
6,040.001,
5,940-00
4.000.bd'
Purple Ash
0,00
6,800-00
6,392.00
6,000.00
7,200-00
9m 520.00
8,560.00�
8,400.00
40 Summit Green Ash
6,400,,00
6,000-00
5,712.00
5,800.00
5,880.00
7,400.00
6,840.00
7,200-00,
40 Skyline Honeylocust
0,00
6.8-0101.
5,712.00
5,920.00
6,520.00
8,520.00
6,400.00
7,200.00
20 White Angel Crab
0.00
110,01—
0. 1 00
2,796.00
2,800.00
2,640.00
3,300.00
2,700.00
3,200.60
40 Carry' Pear
0.00
..... . 0.001
0.00
—
5,880.00..
5,880.00
0.00
8,560.00.1—
7,200.00
— - ------
29 Northem Red, Oak
0,00--
. 0.00
0-00
5,365.00
5,945.001
7,511.00
8,410.001,
8,120.00
._
—
30 Greens Linden
0.00
4,500.00
- 4,194.00
4,410.00 1
4,860.001
6,300.00
5,550.00
5,400.00
." TotaJ
25
101, 0.0011 * 32.146-001
.10
� 38,584-115
1-
54,7 50.00
66,746:00
62,300.00
65,310.00
68,800.00
2.5" Subtotal (Mike Greco) 54,750.00
1.5" Subtotal (St. Aubin)— 16,49,830
Total 711248-30
Budgeted 71,250-00
* - Partial total due to no bid items
All .......... .... ............ 1" ....................
MAINTAIN
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM THE CM USA
TO: Village Manager
la q
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 10, 1994'
SUBJECT: Bid Results, Demolition and Removal
Residence at 1 s. Emerson
On August 9, 1994, sealed bids were opened, for the dWww mol, I*tl'l !on
and removal of the single-family residence and concrete garage
slab at 1 S. Emerson. There were, five Invitational bids sent
out plus advertising in the local newspaper as required. Only
one bid was received, which was from Albrecht Enterprises for
$6,720.
Last Novemberr,we had a bid opening for demolition of several
properties in the Central Business District and one of those was
ag
for the demolition of a two,story building and•
double gare at
Emerson,. Albrecht 'Enterprises was awarded that bid for for
$6,1850, which was more than the figure quoted for 1 S. Emerson.
Based upon review of prior bl*jds,, I , believe that the single bid
as submitted by Albrecht Enterprises is a valid, bid and their
price 'is very competitive when measured against other work in
'this Community.
1 1
Funding Is allocated for this proposed work under account code
55-077-62-81,03. 1 recommend acceptance of the bid as submitted
bY Albrecht Enterpri'ses for the demolition and removal of the
building atEmerson for an amount not to exceed $6..720.
=22:_
ff6rbert t. Weeks 0; -
HLW/td
DEMO-'94.RES/FILES/BIDS
VILLAGE OF OUNT PROSPECT
Join 1WOSP19cr, al"Oz 60056
ENGINEERING DMSION
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
............
TO: Chuck Bencic, Director of In Services ,
FROM: Fred Tennyson, Project Engineer
DATE: August 9, 1994
SUBJECT: I -Oka Avenue/Sunset Road Reconstruction
On August 9, 1994 at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the I -Oka Avenue/ Sunset Road
Reconstruction Project. At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud.
1 60 1 WIS 0111 1 ! �
Six Contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of 5 Contractors submitted
bids. The bids range from a low of $316,052.75 by Arrow Road Construction Co. to a high
of $405,760.50 by R. W. Dunteman Co. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was
$354,261.25.
7kWFR1rffi
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 5% of their total bid as required by the
Contract Documents. All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds.
BIDDEWJA
BID
Arrow Road Construction $316,052.75
J.A. Johnson Paving Co. $3881470.00
Alliance Contractors $3912370.75
Lenny Hoffman Excay. $39530631.75
R.W. Dunteman $4052760.50
Engineer's *neees Estimate $3541,261.25
OU, ALL.MCMQNS Qf L-OALEM
The low bidder Arrow Road Construction has performed this type of work many times in the
Village. Their quality of work has ranged from very good to marginal.
M, QhDdKN.DAT1Q ,
The Village is familiar with the services provided by Arrow Road Construction Company, the
Engineering Division recommends awarding them this contract with a bid price of $316,052.25.
Page 2
I -(AKA AVENUE AND SUNSET ROAD RECONSTRUCTION
Bid Opening - August 9, 1994
Funding for this project is shown on Page 221 of the 1994/95 budget under Account Code
No. 56-077-71-8530 which currently has $1,500,000.00.
Fred Tennyson,
Project Engineer
I concur with the above recommendation
wW
46
Chuck Bencic,
Director of Inspection Services
I concur with the above recommendation
Herb i'Weeks,
Director of Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
aka Avenue / Sunset Road Reconstruction
Augest 9, 1994
Engineer's Estimate
Unit Price Total
11.50
72,450.00
Arrow Road Cons( Co.
JAJohnson Paving
10.00
Alliance Contractors, Inc.
Lenny Hoffman Excay., Inc.
R.W. Dunteman Company
Item
Estimated
26.00
Mount Prospect, 111.60056
Arlington Hts.
Ill. 60005
Woodstock, Ill.
60099
Wilmette, 111. 60091
Addison, Ill. 60101
No. Items
Quantity
Units
Unit Price
Total
Unit Price
Total
Unit Price
Total
Unit Price
Total
Unit Price
Total
1. SPECIAL EXCAVATION
6.300
CY
13-05
82,215.00
15.00
94,500.00
14.10
88.830.00
15.65,
98.595.00
18.20
114,660.00
2. SUB BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL TYPE C
250
CY
6.00
11500.00
15.00
3,750.00
31.00
7,750.00
26.15
6,537.50
23.50
5,875.00
3. AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TY B 12"
4,400
TON
9.55
42,020.00
10.50
46,200.00
11.35
49.940.00
13.82
60,808.00
9.75
42,900.00
4. BIT. MATERIALS (PRIME COAT)
1.500
GAL
0.75
1,125.00
1.50
2,250.00
1.05
1,575.00
1.45
2,175.00
0.01
15.00
5. BIT. CONCRETE BINDER CRSE MIX B TY 2
630
TON
25.00
15,750.00
32.00
20,160.00
27.50
17,325.00
27.50
17,325.00
28.75
18,112.50
6. BIT. CONCRETE SURFACE CRSS. MIX D, CL L TY 3
580
TON
30.45
17,661.00
34.00
19,720.00
33.50 II.
19,430.00
31.50
18,270.00
28.75
16,675.00
7. CONCRETE CURB REMOVAL & TYPE B 4.12 REPI.
4,950
IF
8.65
42,817.50
11.50
56,925.00
12.35
61,132.50
13.30
65,835.00
9.85
48,757.50
8. PCC SIDEWALK REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT 5"
21,500
SP
2.35
50,525.00
2.90
62,350.00
3.30
70,950.00
3.10
66,650.00
3.15
67.725.00
9- PCC SIDEWALK REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT 6"
3,275
SP
2.75
9,006.25
3.00
9,825.00
3.45
11,298.75
3.15
10,316.25
3.30
10.807.50
10. STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1 12"
200
LF
21.00
4,200.00
32.00
6,400.00
29.00
5,800.00
25.70
5,140.00
26.00
5,200.00
11. STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1 15'
210
IF
25.00
5,250.00
34.00
7,140.00
31.00
6,510.00
26.60
5,586.00
30.00
6,300.00
12. STORM SEWER, RUBBER GASKET, TYPE 1 18"
30
IF
28.25
847.50
45.00
1,350.00
35.00
11050.00
32.60
978.00
45.00
1.350.00
13. TRENCH BACKFILL
115
CY
24.50
2,817.50
25.00
2,875.00
21.00
2,415.00
18-70,
2,150.50
26.00
2,990.00
14. STRUCTURE To BE ADJUSTED
3
EA
185.00
555.00
175.00
525.00
230.00
690.00
190.00
570.00
250.00
750.00
IS. STRUCTURE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED
10
EA
495.00
4,950.00
700.00
7,000.00
900.00
9.000.00
630.00
6,300.00
800.00
8,000.00
16. STRUCTURE TO BE ABANDONED
9
EA
133.00
1,197.00
125.00
1,125.00
110.00
990.00
100.00
900.00
200.00
1,800.00
ii. INLET TYPE A w/NEW TYPE I FRAME, OPEN LID
6
EA
546.00
3,276.00
750.00
4,500.00
555.00
3,330.00
445.00
2,670.00
750.00
4,500.00
18. CATX11BASIN TYPE A w/NEW TYPE I FRAME, OPEN LID
7
EA
1,600.00
11,200.00
1,450.00
10,150.00
1,680.00
11,760.00
815.00
5,705.00
950.00
6,650.00
19- PCC DRIVEWAY REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT 6"
160
SY
22.00
3,520.00
29.00
4,640.00
29.45
4,712.00
24.20
3,872.00
28.55
4,568.00
20. -BIT. DRIVEWAY REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT 3"
200
SY
14.75
2,950.00
20.00
4,000.00
16.75
3,350.00
18.90
3,780.00
27.00
5,400.00
21. PARKWAY RESTORATION
1655
SY
6.00
9,930.00
7.00
11,585.00
4.50
7,447.50
2.70
4.468.50
5.00
8,275.00
22. TRAFFIC CONTROL & PROTECTION
I
L SUM
2,440.00
2,440.00
11,000.00
11,000.00
5,375.00
5,375.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
20,950.00
20,050.00
23. 24 -MONTH MAINTENANCE BOND
I I L SUM
300.00
300.00
500.00
-L 500.00
710.00
710.001
4,000.00
4,000.00
3,500.00,
3.500.00
Total
T2!a.
1.7�1
Total
F 3
Total 1
391,370.751
Total
395,631.75
Total
405.760.510
Engineer's Estimate
Unit Price Total
11.50
72,450.00
21.00
5.250.00
10.00
44,000.00
0.75
1,125.00
23.00
14,490.00
26.00
15,080.00
10.00
49,500.00
3.50
75.250.00
3.75
12,281.25
36.00
7,200.00
45.00
9,450.00
54.00
1,620.00
21.00
2,415.00
150.00
450.00
700.00
7,000.00
250.00
2,250.00
700.00
4,200.00
1,000.00
7,000.00
27.00
4,320.00
25.00
5,000.00
6.00
9,930.00
3,500.00
3,500.00
500.00,
500.00
Total 1
354,261.25
4N, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
INS, . ....... . ......
TO: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager,
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Dti =Itoo
lz
DATE: August 11, 1994
SUBJECT: Agreement For Computer Software With A. E. Klawitter and Associates
Pursuant to the recommendation presented to the Village Board on August 9' 19949 1 am requesting
that the following agreements with A. E. Klawitter and Associates be approved:
1. A License agreement for eighteen specific software modules as listed in Exhibit B of
the attached License Agreement. The modules are divided into two phases with eight
modules in Phase I and ten modules in Phase 2. Phase I also includes systems design
consulting services for Inspection Services and Human Services. The agreement calls
for a payment of 50% of Phase I when the agreement is a" gned and 50% of Phase 2
on June 1, 1995. Forty percent of the remaining cost for each module is due 60 days
of each module is installed with the remaining 10% 180 days after installation. The
total license tee for the modules in, Phase I is $43,850 and the total for Phase 2 is
$36,875, for an overall total of $80,725.
2. An Application Service Contract for annual maintenance of the eighteen software
application modules. The annual maintenance fee is 15 % of the original license fee for
each module with the fee becoming effective one year after each module has been
installed. When all modules have been installed, the annual maintenance fee will be
$10,984.
3. A System Application Retainer to provide technical assistance during the next year.
The retainer is for $1,500-00 (20 hours at $75.00 per hour) and covers any services
related to computer hardware and software including service for local area networks.
Any balance that is left on the anniversary date may be applied toward a new AEK
Application License or AEK Upgrade License Fee.
1
4. A provision for h2ining four Village employees per module at an estimated, cost of
$18,,'450. Trwinmig costs are billed at $,200.00 per day for the first, employee and
$150.00 per day for additional employees. Each training session also will be
videotaped for in-house training.
Michael E. Janonis
Page 2
Agreement For Computer Software With A. E. Klawitter and Associates
5. Software Modification costs estimated at $20,000. During the implementation planning
for each module, areas that need to be modified will be determined and a fixed cost will
be proposed. The amount estimated is based upon potential 'modifications that were
included in the Request for Proposal.
6. Estimated file conversion costs of $5,800. File conversion costs include reformatting
data, loading and testing of data files.
7. Project management costs of $2,920.00. This fee includes three additional sets of
documentation, the security and control module and costs associated with the insertion
and certification of the hardware.
Following is a summary of the above costs:
1.
License Agreement
$80,725
2.
Application Service Contract (2nd Year)
-
3.
System Administration Retainer
1,500
4.
Training
18,450
5.
Software Modification
20v000
6.
File Conversion
5v800
7.
Project Management
2.920
Totals
$1291
The above total for A. E. I(lawitter and Associates is $9,660 less than the estimate of $139,055 that
was presented at the Committee of the Whole meeting because the Report Writer software will be bid
along with the recommended hardware rather than include it in software. Bids for the computer
hardware will, be mailed next week with the proposed bid opening scheduled for September 15, 1994.
It is my recommendation that the Village Board authorize the above purchases from A. E. I(lawitter
and Associates at an amount not to exceed $129,395. Copies of the agreements indicated in items 1.
2, and 3 are attached.
DCJ/sm
IM
Fla
Mr. Dave Jepson
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect,, IL 60056
Dear Mr. Jepson:
Enclosed for your review are the modified agreements as discussed. Also enclosed Is a list of hardware
vendors, our current training calendar for August and September,, and the cost quotation for data fie
conversion.
It was a pleasure meeting with you and the rest of the committee on Monday. I look forward to final approval
at your board meeting on August 16th. AEK Is totally committed to a successful Installation of our software
at the Village of Mount Prospect. As I conveyed to you before, I you ever have any questions or concerns
about the project as the Installation begins, do not hesitate to call me.
Thank you choosing AEK for your software solution[
Sincerely,
A.E. Klawitter & Associates Inc.
Joseph G. 14awitter
President
enc.
W,
5005 Newport Drive, Suite 501, Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008 (708) 392-6880 FAX (708) 392-5775
License Agreement Page 1 of 3
PARTIES: A.E. KLAWIITER & ASSOCIATES, INC,, Roiling Meadows, Illinois, an Illinois corporation CAEKJ
and the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, an Illinois corporation ("LICENSEE")
DATE: /___/
CONSIDERATION: License fee, mutual covenants, conditions and agreements provided in this Agreement.
LICENSE FEE: $84,725
TERMS:
1. License. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, AEK hereby grants to Licensee a non
exclusive, perpetual license to use both the Software Package described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the 'Basic Package') and any and all modifications therein
offered by AEK and included hereunder from time to time (hereinafter the Basic Package and such
improvements are collectively referred to as the 'Package') solely for Licensee's own Internal data
processing operations and solely upon compatible computer systems. Licensee acknowledges that the►
Package has been provided at a substantial effort and tense and constitutes AEK's unique and valuable
property and trade secrets and that it acquires no right, title or interest In such Package, property or trade
secrets except for the license provided in this Agreement
2. Basic Cost+ Licensee shall pay AEK the License Fee for the Package, fifty. percent (50%) of which shall
be paid upon, the execution of this agreement, the balance Is payable according to the terms outlined in
Exhibit B. AEK shall provide that portion of the Basic Package necessary to replace the licensee's present
data processing service within 90 days after the execution of this Agreement„ or upon availability of
compatible computer hardware, whichever is later. A timetable for the installation of the remainder of the
package shall be developed by mutual agreement.
3. Termination. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, the license granted by this Agreement may
be terminated (a) by the non -breaching party, effective twelve (12) days after the receipt of the notice
provided for herein, if a party commits a material breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement, provided
that the breach was not cured within ten (10) days after receipt of notice of the breach or (b) by AEK,
effective immediately upon (i} the flung of bankruptcy or any other state or federal insolvency or similar
proceedings by or against Licensee which, when flied against Licensee, Ore not dismissed within thirty (30)
days of the institution thereof; or (iij the appointment of a receiver or trustee for, or any seizure, attachment
or levy upon, all or any part of Licensee's business or assets made or acquiesced in by Licensee.
Immediately after the termination of this Agreement, Licensee shall return to AEK all materials (and all copies
thereof) furnished by AEK with respect to the Package.
4. other Services. The oast of the license of the Package includes the provision of basic installation
services by AEK including Installing programs on disk media, configuring basic client infomnation not
accessible by the client, disk file allocations, and ongoing service and assistance by telephone for one year
from contract. Any additional services by AEK, other than as expressly provided in this Agreement shall be
performed upon .the request of the Licensee, on mutually acceptable terms and conditions:
Initials: AEK: LICENSEE: