HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 06/06/2000Next Ordinance No. 5111
Next Resolution No, 24-00
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday
50 South Emerson Street June 6, 2000
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis prikkel
Trustee Paul Hoefert TruStee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Corcoran
IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Prikkel
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 16, 2000
VI. APPROVE BILLS
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION: United States Army Week, June 12-18, 2000
B. PRESENTATION: Mount Prospect Youth Commission Annual Report
C. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONTINUED STUDY FOR THE NORTHWEST
TRANSIT CORRIDOR (Exhibit A)
D. Appointments
ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE A T lO0 SOUTH EMERSON STREETw 847/392-6000~ TOD847/392-6064.
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IX. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 10-2000, 507 S. Wiile Street
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 507 SOUTH WILLE STREET (Exhibit B
This ordinance grants a variation to allow the construction of a 672 sq. ft. two-car
detached garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3-2 to approve the request,
however, the Village Code requires at least four (4) votes for approval. The Village
Board approved the request with a vote of 5-2.
B. ZBA 12-2000, 1500 E. Euclid Avenue
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1500 EAST EUCLID AVENUE (Exhibit C)
This ordinance grants a variation for the construction of a 120 feet (120') tall
personal wireless communication facility. The Zoning Board of Appeals
voted 5-0 for approval.
C. ZBA 11-2000, 1108 S. Robert Drive
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1108 SOUTH ROBERT DRIVE (Exhibit D)
This ordinance grants a Conditional Use permit to allow a front porch addition
to encroach four feet (4') into the front yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals
voted 5-0 for approval.
D. ZBA 14-2000, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect
1~ reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE
VILLAGE CODE (Exhibit E)
This ordinance amends Chapter 14 (Zoning) of the Village Code relative to the
modification of public notice requirements for text amendments. The Zoning Board
of Appeals voted 5-0 for approval.
E. 2"d reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS (Exhibit F)
This ordinance authorizes the issuance of $2,165,000 of general obligation bonds
for flood control improvements.
F. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR THE
SALE OF WATER BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION OFFICE IN PROSPECT HEIGHTS (Exhibit G)
(This item was deferred from the May 16 Village Board meeting).
X. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 18-2000, 1610W. Algonquin Road
The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the zoning map, from R-4 (Multi-family
Development) to B-3 (Community Business), and a Conditional Use permit for the
construction of a stand-alone parking lot on the north side of Algonquin Road, east
of Busse Road. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 6-0 for approval of both requests.
B. ZBA 19-2000. 503 S. Main Street
The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use permit to construct a three (3) car
attached garage as part of a new home at 503 S. Main Street. The Zoning Board ,
of Appeals voted 6-0 for approval.
C. A RESOLUTION REQUESTIN( OF CENTRAL ROAD
IN ORDER TO CONDUCT A
·: ~ (Exhibit H)
D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHOpJZlNG THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 20 WEST BUSSE AVENUE (Exhibit I)
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A DETERMINATION OF THE
PREVAILING WAGE RATES (Exhibit J)
This ordinance, required by the State of Illinois, adopts the prevailing wage rates
established by the State for public works projects provided by contractors.
Xl. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. Year 2000 Shared Cost Sidewalk Program
2. Public Works uniform rental and cleaning contract
B. Request for approval of Northwest Municipal Conference crack-sealing bid results
C. Request for ratification of expenditure authorized by the Village Manager for
environmental clean-up at 3 West Central Road (former Dr. McLean office building)
D. Request for approval of proposal to rehabilitate Deep Well No. 17 at R°ute 83 and
Camp McDonald Road
E. Status Report
Xll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XlII, CLOSED SESSION
PERSONNEL 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (2) - "Collective negotiating matters between the public body
and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for
one or more classes or employees."
LITIGATION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (11) - "Litigation, when an action against, affecting or on behalf
of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal,
or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for
the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting."
XlV. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MAY 16, 2000
CALL CALL TO ORDER
TO ORDER Mayor Farley celled the meeting to order at 7:38 p.m.
ROLL CALL
ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Irvana Wilks
POSTING OF
PRESENTATION OF COLORS
COLORS The Mount Prospect Police Department presented the Posting of Colors.
PLEDGE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Farley led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION INVOCATION
Mayor Farley gave the invocation.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MINUTES Trustee Hoefert. seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held May 2, 2000.
Upon roll cell: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Farley
Nays: None
Motion cerried.
BILLS APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to approve payment of the
following bills:
General Fund $ 363,306
Refuse Disposal Fund 114,725
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund 20,564
Debt Service Funds 401,675
Capital Improvement Fund 14,662
Capital Improvement Construction Fund
Downtown Redevelopment Const. Fund 10,863
Street Improvement Construction Fund 1,250
Flood Control Construction Fund
Water & Sewer Fund 276,611
Parking System Revenue Fund 943
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 2,867
Vehicle Replacement Fund 818
Computer Replacement Fund
Risk Management Fund 194,799
Police Pension Fund 1,167
Fire Pension Fund
Flexcomp Trust Fund 2,935
Escrow Deposit Fund 19,585
Benefit Trust Funds
$1,426,770
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried,
FINANCIAL FINANCIAL REPORT
REPORT Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Comoran, moved for approval of the financial,
report for January 1,2000 - April 30, 2000, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SISTER CITIES MAYOR'S REPORT
DELEGATION Mayor Farley extended a warm welcome to the Mayor of S6vres, France, Francois
Kosciusko-Morizet, and his wife Benedicte, to Francois and Martine Chavatte, and to
Rolande Sarinelli and Didier Adon. They were visiting Mount Prospect as part of the
Sister Cities relationship between S~vres and Mount Prospect. Following Mayor Farley's
welcome, Mayor Kosciusko-Morizet expressed his gratitude and introduced each
member of his party to the audience.
APPTS.
There were no board or commission appointments made at this meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 37-99, Phase lB Downtown Redevelopment, Norwood Builders
(Deferred from the May 2 meeting)
An ordinance was presented for second reading for a Conditional Use permit for a
ZBA 37-99 Planned Unit Development of 34 condominium units with underground and surface
NW HWY & parking, and retail shops, at the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street.
MAIN STREET
William Cooney, Director of Community Development, stated that details relative to the
proposed brick color and a parking agreement, are still being finalized. He stated that
meetings have been held with Bank One officials and other local property owners, in an
effort to develop an off-site parking agreement. As the proposed development will not be
occupied until next year, staff is confident that such agreement will be finalized in the
near future, and has modified the ordinance to stipulate that no certificate of occupancy
will be granted by the Village until such agreement is presented.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved for approval of Ordinance
No. 5110:
ORD. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDiTiONAL USE FOR A PLANNED UNIT
NO. 5110 DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS PHASE lB OF
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST
HIGHWAY AND MAIN STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 10-2000 ZBA 10-2000, 507 S. Wille Street
507 S. WILLE The Village Board was asked to consider an appeal by the petitioner, for a variation to
STREET allow the construction of an oversized, 672 sq. fi., two-car detached garage. The Zoning
Board of Appeals had pre,~iously voted 3-2 to approve the request, however, the Village
Code requires at least four votes for approval
Page 2 - May 16, 2000
Mayor Farley explained {hai a (~0r~cu~rence vote would deny the petitioner's request, and
a majority of "nay" votes would allow the construction of the garage.
Trustee Corcoran seconded by Trustee Skowron moved to concur with the vote of the
ZBA, thereby denying the request in ZBA case number 10-2000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowren, Farley
Motion failed.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the June 6, 2000 Village Board
meeting.
ZBA 12-2000 ZBA 12-2000, 1500 E. Euclid Avenue
1500 E. EUCLID A request was presented for a variation to allow the construction of a 120 foot tall
AVENUE personal wireless communication facility at Weiss Memorial Park. The Code allows for
monopole structures up to 70 feet in height, Ayesha Zaheer, representing Cook
Inlet/Voicestream PCS, satisfied the Board's concerns relative to the proximity to
neighboring residences The Zoning Board of Appeals had voted 5-0 for approval of this
request.
Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to concur with the
recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals, to grant the petitioner's request.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the June 6, 2000 Village Board
meeting.
ZBA 11-2000 ZBA 11-2000, 1108 S. Robert Drive
1108 S. A request was presented for a Conditional Use permit to allow a front porch addition to
ROBERT DRIVE encroach four feet into the front yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals had voted
5-0 for approval,
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved to concur with the recommendation
of the Zoning Board to grant the petitioner's request.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corooran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the June 6 Village Board meeting.
ZBA 14-2000 ZBA 14-2000, Text Amendment, Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE OF A request was presented by staff, to amend Chapter 14 (Zoning) of the Village Code
MOUNT relative to the modification of public notice requirements for text amendments.
PROSPECT
Existing language in the Code does not exclude requests for text amendments from the
requirements for public notification by mail, but the proposed Code revisions would
specifically list map amendments, conditional uses, variations, and appeals, as cases
requiring public notification by mail and posted signs,
Trustee Wilks stated her support for eliminating the requirement to notify residents of
proposed text amendments by mail, however, she emphasized the importance of still
making this information available to the public in alternate ways, with one possibly being
the Village's own television station, MPTV; additionally, she asked staff to consider some
additional means of notifying the public.
Page 3 - May 16, 2000
The Zoning Board of Appeals had voted 5-0 for apprOval to grant the request for the
proposed text amendments.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the
recommendation of the Zoning Board to grant the request for the proposed text
amendments.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the June 6 Village Board meeting.
Mayor Farley stated the next item on the agenda, a resolution authorizing the Viflage to
SELL WATER sell water to the Social SeCurity Administration office in Prospect Heights, had been
TO PROSPECT recommended for deferral to the next Village Board meeting, as some of the contract
HEIGHTS details were not finalized.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to defer the above resolution to
the June 6, 2000 Village Board meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
GENERAL
OBLIGATION An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would authorize the issuance of
BONDS $2,165,000 of general obligation bonds for flood control improvements.
Michael Janonis, Village Manager, stated the bid opening would be held on June 6,
and exact amounts would be available for the board meeting that night.
The ordinance will be presented for second reading at the June 6, 2000 Village Board
meeting.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Mr. Janonis noted the presence of the French delegation, and highlighted the activities
that were planned for them, and the residents.
PUBLIC WORKS
OPEN HOUSE; He also invited the audience to attend the Public Works Open House, scheduled for
MAY 20 Saturday, May 20.
Trustee Skowron reminded the audience of the May 26 deadline for public comments on
TRAIN WHISTLE train whistle blowing throughout the Village, and provided the E-mail address for input.
BLOWING
Trustee Hoefert asked that the discussion for oversized garages be scheduled for the
GARAGE very near futuro; Mr. Janonis stated that it is scheduled fora July meeting.
DISCUSSION
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
None.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Fadey declared the meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Velma Wo Lowe
Village Clerk
Page 4 - May 16, 2000
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
31-May-00
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 05/12/00 Per Attached Credits/ Balance
05/12/00 05131100 List of Bills Debits 05131100
General Fund 9,256,586 962,967 795,460 9,424,093
Special Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,655,426 51,834 142,377 1,564,883
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 754,072 1,019,756 287,745 1,486,083
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 11,655 25 880 10,800
Community Development BIk Grant Fund 76,463 71 16,182 60,352
Debt Service Funds 3,617,860 1,236 118,195 3,500,901
Capital Pro~iects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 2,637,885 50,001 59,367 2,628,519
Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 53,686 53,686
Capital Improvement Construction Fund 179,061 179,061
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 304,244 84 26,103 278,225
Street Improvement Construction Fund 4,089,375 91,108 4,180,483
1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,675 4,675
Flood Control Construction Fund 1,198,683 43,399 1,155,284
Enterorise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 3,107,962 254,304 41,377 3,320,889
Parking System Revenue Fund 705,890 9,179 18 715,051
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 179,983 12,929 167,054
Vehicle Replacement Fund 4,956,751 9,611 4,947,140
Computer Replacement Fund 247,014 247,014
Risk Management Fund 3,319,523 31,890 134,570 3,216,843
Trust & A_oency Funds
Police Pension Fund 31,518,992 39,272 29,836 31,528,428
Fire Pension Fund 32,507,520 28,994 27,417 32,509,097
Flexcomp Trust Fund 19,445 8,979 19,625 8,799
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,473,691 22,695 22,736 1,473,650
Benefit Trust Funds 100,288 544 99,744
101,976,730 2,572,395 1,758,371 102,760,754
REPORT: APBOARDR~T GENEEATED: 5 NOV 99 15:50 EUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 1
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MODitT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FRON MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME I~VOICE DESCRI~ION A~OUNT
001
01820 A~ SWIF? PRINT, INC. MAY-JDNE 10477,00
02131 ABBOT OFFICE SYSTONS MAGAZINE STORAGE BOX 20.60
01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BUILDING & ~[~3,DWARE SUPPLIES 26.59
BUILDING & HARDWARE SUPPLIES 130.50
157,09
01227 AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC. EQUIPMENT 258.40
01246 AIRGAS NORTH CENTP~L CYLINDER ~AL 75.75
01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. BAIANCE-INV32295/31644 116.80
TEAFFIC MAINT 1606,00
1722.80
01518 AMBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP., INC. CHATRIDGE 506.30
01535 A~ERICAN A~BORSST SUPPLIES, IN ANCBOR/DUC~ILL SYSTON 327,18
01561 A~EXICAN CEA~GE SERVICE SENIOR TAXI RIDES 127.80
04948 A~ERt~ PLANNING ASSOCIATION BEXVICE 75,00
01780 A~EXITECH SE2VIVCE 174,95
S/H CNI~ PHONE DIBECTORY 4,25
179,20
01830 ANDERSON ELB~/ATOR CO. MAINTF~;ANCE 160.63
01833 k~DERSON ~OCK COMPANY ~I)~RE SUPPLIES 13.80
00372 A~DLEN, GLEN REIi~ EXPEXSES 173.43
RE Ii~ EXPENSES 154.10
327.53
04958 APNLICATION DEVELOPERS TEAINING TAPE~ 710.00
01994 ~ ~ONES~F2~T SER%ricEs COFFEE SUPPLIES 228.50
02802 ~ING~ON ~S. FI~ ACAD~XY ~GISTHATION 375,00
~GISTHATION 750,00
1125,00
02167 AI~%ON ~ CONST~I~CTIO~ PATCNI~(~ MATRR~3~S 366,75
PATCN~G ~Bi~!/kL$ 624.75
PATCNII;G MA~ERB~ 318,00
PATCHING MATEI~[.%LS 458.40
1767,90
REPORT: APEOARRRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 2
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION MOUNT
01124 ARTHUR CLEREN, INC. SUPPLIES 71.28
02270 AT&T SERVICE 6.99
SERVICE 23.29
SERVICE 46.59
SERVICE 23.29
SERVICE 88.52
SERVICE 23.29
SERVICE 34.94
SERVICE 60.57
SERVICE 18.64
SERVICE 18.64
SERVICE 83.86
SERVICE 472.88
SERVICE 463.57
SERVICE 298.17
1663.24
02283 ATLAS BOBCAT INC. RENTAL 120.00
04938 BALDWIN, DELLA REFUND 50.00
02290 BALIDONS, PENNY BUM}IS ~ATEX & MYLAR BALLOONS 300.00
04985 BELLVILLE, RR. REBATE-PUBLIC WAlK 392.00
04966 BESSERT, MARREN REFUND-PUBLIC WAXK 175.00
02788 REST QUALITY CLEANING, INC. SERVICES 6812.00
02795 BESTHOFF, LANCE REIRR EXPENSES 30.00
04942 BINVARIN, MARIAM DUPLICATE NTIC~ER 54.00
04967 BIRR, ELAINE R/E TRANSFER TAX REFUHD 382.00
02924 BOCA INTERNATIOMA~ INC. YEA~J~Y RR~{BERSHIP 35.00
00468 ~OLIN, JE~IE a. REIRRURE[vf.~T 88.24
04968 BOTT, JEFF REIRR-SNDES 47.34
03038 BO{~REN, JAMES R. REFUND 24.00
02938 BO~i~N DINTRIBUTIOM CENTER AUTO PE~RAtR P~TS & ~ 33.46
AUTO PERAIR PARTS & HARDWARE 24.92
58.38
00470 BREHOB, I~EAiqI{E CONRE, RBNCR 1795.00
02945 BILISTOI, COURT $ISYER CITIES 5149.45
ELDEP, HOMOR LUNDHEON 1427.79
6877.24
REPORT: APHOARDRFT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 18:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF PILLS PKESENTED TO THE POARD OF TRUSTEES
FRS MaY I2 2000 TO MaY 31 2000
DEPT VENOOR NRE VENOOR NA~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01006 FOSSE CAR WASH, INC. CAR WASH 10.50
01014 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEA~ING SUPPLIES 257.00
CLUING SUPPLIES 257.00
CLEA~ING SUPPLIES 257.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES 257.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES 257.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES 257.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES 750.00
2292.00
01023 CAN2 MON~E~HIP-MIDDLETON 75.00
01053 CELLULA~ ONE - CHICAGO SERVICE 33.4I
01056 CENTRAL COntINENTAL BAKERY BAKERY 60.75
CAKE 51.84
SHEET CAKE 75.15
BAKE GOODS 31.42
219.16
01058 CENTURY ~AES, INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 333.71
03907 CHAMBERS, RYAN RETMB-SHOES 75.76
04955 CENLINI, CWA.REES RENATE 175.00
01077 CHICAGO C~. SERVICE, INC. SOFTWARE 100.00
04987 ONO, YOON R/E T~S~/~ TAX RE~OND 480.00
01097 CINTAS UORP UNIFOAM RENTAL 289.37
ONIFO~ EXPONSE/~,CEAMICS 36.00
ONIFO~ ~XPENSE/~EC]{AMICS 119.30
444.67
04056 CLANS INDOSTRIES SUPREIHS 877.00
01118 CLE~.K OF TEE CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL FOR - 051800 700.00
PA~O~ FOR - 053100 700.00
PAYROLl, FOR- 051800 i90.00
PAYROI,Z FOR- 053100 190.00
1780.00
01163 CONCARE INC. CONCRETE 8105.00
00309 COONE~, Will, lAM d. CONKEREiqcE ADVANCE 704.00
01222 DAILY HERALD SUBSCRIFIloN 33.60
$~I~ 47.50
~ ~A'~ION I'RO,]ECT '15.63
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY J~N0100 10:20 PAGE 4
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF SILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FRO~ ~,AY 12 2000 TO ~AY 31 2000
DER VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~OUET
156.73
01223 DAILY OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 95.53
04732 DBT ONLINE, INC. SERVICE 150.00
04051 DIG~, INC INTEkKET SERVICE 1376.66
01281 DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS INC. GROUND LADDERS 640.15
04953 DIXIE RS SEC SEAL 136.92
01287 DOOR SYST~S, INC. PLPAIRS 366.07
00319 DOUBEK, RICHARD ~RENSES/DOUBEK 196.20
01291 DOVER ELEVATOR C~PANY MAIETENAiICE 190.57
01298 DRAWING BOARD INC. LABELS 97.88
04334 DUKE'S OIL SERVICE, INC. RL~IOVE WASTE OIL 50.00
01328 EL-COR INDUSTRIES, INC. SUPPLIES 277.65
01342 ~ERGENCy ~DICAL PDODUCTS PEDIATRIC PROSPLINTS 52.29
04961 EXCHARGE & O~LOOK SUBSCRIPTION 19.99
01366 E~PERIA~ INFO.SERVICE 25.00
01369 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE SUPPLIES 285.00
SERVICE REQUIET FORMS 205.00
490.00
00326 FAEtEY, GERALD L. LIMB-TICKETS 50.00
~IMBURSEI~.~tT 1904.70
1954.70
01377 FERERAL ~PKESS CORP SNIPPING CHARGES 26.43
00329 FELL, JUDITH B. ASSORTED SUPPLIES 74.98
00102 FI~ RE'SION ~ND PAYROLL FOR - 051800 12168.39
PAYROLL FOR- 053100 13890.76
26059.13
01412 FLEET SAFETY SUPPLY BULBS 86.72
01414 [lINK C~PANV RE[IAC~[,iEET A ~ 788.40
01422 FOLG~RA FLAG & DECORATIItG, INC INNTALLATI~ OF ~%IillERS 880.0D
01866 FORD, LAP, RY ROEBCN ~A'STERY & SUPPLIES 115.88
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15158 RUN: THURSDAY J~N0100 10120 PAGE 5
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
:2 28o0 TO 31 2ooo
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~OONT
01123 FRANK CLESEN AND SONS, INC. ANNUALS 2507.00
04962 FRIEDRICHS, JILL SUPPLIES 86.58
01445 FUJITSU BUSINESS CO~f. SYSTEMS pLY MAINT 41.48
PLY MAINT 145.17
PLY ~AINT 259.24
pLY MAINT 145.17
pLY MAINT 497.73
pLY MAINT 145.17
pLY MAINT 186.65
pLY MAINT 337.01
PLY MAINT 98.51
PLY MAINT 98.51
pLY MAINT 471.81
pLY ~AINT 2758.27
INV800492/800493 5441.47
INV800490 1616.57
INV801052 164.00
12406.76
04991 G & M INC. CONCRETE RESTORATION 15000.00
01461 GALL'S, INC. RECBARGERELE BATTERY 201.85
SOPPLRES 338.34
SUPPLIES 120.65
660.84
01497 GLUNDALH INDUSTRIES NONORGUARD SUPPLIES 191.00
HONOR GDARDSUPPLIES 70.50
261.50
01528 GREAT ~ FIRE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 243.17
01555 NANEY AND SONS, B. INC. DISFOUAL OF LOGS 175.00
01558 HANSEN ASSOCIATES MONTHLY SERVICE AGREE/g2{T 494.68
MONTHLY SERVICE AGREF2g. J{1 258.72
MONTHLY SERVICE AGREEMEI7 100.00
853.40
04989 HEALTH DATA SYSTEMS, EMC DUP PM~ 20.00
04971 NUBRESTREIT, CALVIN REBATE-PUBLIC WALK 140.00
01596 HINES I~I~ER, EDWARD LUF~ER 93.12
SUPPLIES 102.08
105.20
01603 HONVERT, LIi{DA RRIMBUP, SE~I~]~ 70.00
04934 HON~, PAUL REIMB-TIC[~S 50.00
R~PORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:88 RUN: THURSDAY JUN01DO 10:20 PAGE 6
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOON~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME I~OICE DESCRI~TIOM AMOUNT
04992 HOLIDAY INN BOTEL ACCOM. 133.20
01609 HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER' PRE-KSPLOYMEN~ PHYSICALS 186.00
PRE-AMPLOY~ENT PHYSICALS 91.00
277.00
01610 BORS DEPOT BUILDING SUPPLIES 65.50
BUILDING SUPPLIES 31.34
96.84
01647 IA~A REGISTER-D.STEAHL 48.00
REGISTER/MALCOLM 45.00
R~GISTER/R.EAVI~CK 45.00
REGISTER/SEAN FOREEY 45.80
180.00
04748 IOMA ICMA-401 PLAN 5/18 425.63
00106 ICMA RETIIIKSENT TRUST - 401 PAYROLL FOR - 051800 316.93
PAYROLL FOR- 053100 348.85
865.78
00107 ICMA RETIIIKSENT TRUST - 457 PAYROLL FOR - 051800 15469.09
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 15285.03
30754.12
01658 ILCMA REGISTER-D.STI/A~L 225.00
00108 ILLINOIS DEPARTNZNT OF RSVEFOE PAYROLL FOR - 851600 1.00
PAYROLL FOR - 051800 16081.87
PAYROLL FOR- 052900 303.31
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 18708.08
3509426
01685 ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN. FIRST RESPOMDRE BOOKS 350.00
01689 ILLINOIS GFOA JOBLINE AD 150.00
01698 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE ~GISTER-FAR~EY 80.00
00109 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL ~TIRR~ENT PAYROLL FOR ~ 051800 237.00
PAYROLL FOR ~ 053100 237.00
474.80
01704 ILLINOIS ~BLIC FOA~TH ASSOO IPHA ~-ROE~S 50.00
017{)8 ILLINOIS SAFETY COUNCIL REGISTRAYIUN ~ 55.00
01121 ILLINOIS mATE DINBUREB24ENT UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 051000 50.38
REPORT: APEOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 7
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSRECT
LIST OF SILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 3i 2000
DEPT VENDOR RER VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DRSCRI~TION AMOUNT
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 13.00
PAYROLL FOR - 051800 519.23
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 519.23
PAYROLL FOR - 051800 195.50
PAYROLL FOR- 053100 195.50
PAYROLL FOR - 051800 126.00
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 126.00
PAYROLL FOR - 051800 60.00
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 60.00
1864.84
04993 ILLINOIS STATE TOLL EWYANTRORITY I-RASS-RICHARDSON 24.00
01724 INKWELL PRINT CARDS 29.20
01896 J.C. LICHT COMPANY PAINTING SUPPLIES 147.94
PAINTING SUPPLIES 23.90
171.84
04941 J~SOM'S CEAREOESE DINNER-SISTER CITIES 504.26
00353 JAMONIS, MICHAEL E. REI~-WINE 161.33
ADVAMCE-REGISTER 762.00
REI~ORS~NT 85.15
1008.48
01775 ~ CONSULT. CIVIL ENGES, LTD. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 1875.83
01783 JOURNAL & TOPICS N~SPAEERS BALANCE INV67513 434.84
01798 KANE, RYAM RESMB EXPOSES 18.00
00368 LANES, ALAN L. REIMB EXPENSES 64.40
01868 t%SALLN NATION~t BANK SAFE~EPINO ~ES 756.59
04346 LENZ, CHRISTOPHER REIMB ESPENSES 350.95
01897 LIFR ARSINT ~ATES FREX GI~)VES 46.75
SUPPLIES 680.00
SUPPLIES 72.50
799.25
01901 LITTLE AMERICA PRIS~R FOOD 327.60
00381 LO~ESTORFER, ESCNAMD REA~B-TICKZTS 25.00
01918 ~ROM'U~Y VAEXOOS UHIU3~ 400.00
04950 MAIN NTEF~YNES~OI',K MEMBERSHIP 195.00
04956 MCRONAT~'N PRISCiqt~ FOOD AFRII, 2000 178.66
HEART: APBOARERPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 8
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOU~ PROSPECT
LIST OF DILLS P~ESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FRO~ MY 12 2000 TO ~AY 31 2000
DEFT VENDOR HER VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION ANOUNT
04974 MCFADDEN, ~GGIE REIWE-SHOES 85.00
04339 MCGUFFIN, MARK REIMBURSE EXPENSES 20.00
01979 MCI WIRELESS PHONE SERVICE 605.08
CELLULAR SERVICE 54.34
CELLPHONE 38.72
698.14
03090 WCKILLOP, ROBERT REIMBURSE EXPENSES 175.93
00116 METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PAYROLL FOR - 051800 730.00
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 730.00
1460.00
00117 METROPOLITAN ALLIANCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 051800 546.00
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 546.00
1092.00
02017 MIDDLETON, JOAN MCSE NETWOREING El{AN 100.00
04138 MIDWEST DATA CORP. PRINTER MAI~. 150.00
04988 MID,ST VENDING DUP P~ 40.00
02028 MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS NAMEPLATE 15.05
04975 MORAN, PAUL R/E TRA~SRE~ T~X REFOND 590.00
02102 ~TUAL'S dST A~K RE~TA~ EQUIP-RENTAL 50.00
04994 MYLIN, ~{ARYLOH REBATE-FRELIC ~A~K 350.00
02129 NATIONAL H~AT AND ~ CO~OR REPAIRE 2383.57
02139 NATIONWIDE PAFERE PAPER FOR NEWELE~TER 15565.55
04997 NCO FINANCIAL SYSTL~S INC SERVICE 117 S. ~IN 29.11
02155 NEXTEL CC~B]NICATIONS PHONE SERVICE 163.95
04099 W~TI{ENW ILLINOIS FIRE ~EF~BERENIP 50.00
02182 NORTWERE ILLINOIS POLICE A~ARM SYBT~ ANN~AL NIPAN WE~TING i5.00
02186 NORTHENW ILLINOIS U~t~EREITY NIU-~A LUNC~ON 15.00
02189 NOET}5~E~T CF/~Tk%~ DISPATCH NTB 4NWE 28122.34
,TORE 7030.58
35152.92
02190 NORTNWEST CC{~H3NITY ~{S DER SERVICE 1863.00
REPORT: APBOARERPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 10:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 9
RELEASE ID :
VILI~RE OF MUU~ PROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 3i 2000
0EPT VENDOR WER VENDOR NME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMON~
02193 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 2160.75
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 229.59
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 218.70
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 91.93
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES i185.88
3886.85
02196 NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE DUES 18250.00
02199 NORTHWEST STATIONE~ INC. OFFICE SUPP 273.78
OFFICE SUPP 14.00
OFFICE SUPP 471.53
OFFICE SUPP 39.90-
OFFICE SUPP 70.74
OFFICE SUPP 139.90
OFFICE SDPP 27.66
987.62
04892 OCEAN TECHNOLOGY SYSTH245 REGISTMATIONS 000.00
REGISTER/DOIAN i00.00
600.00
02230 OFFICEMAXCREDIT PI2%N INV6130,82§3,2044806,2544501 812.85
02239 OWE HOUR M~O PHOTO PHOTO'S t59.60
02255 PACC MLUBERSHIP-D.BWEON 40.00
02256 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. PUBLICATION OF BID HOTICES 48.69
LEGAL N O liCE 22.79
71.48
02259 PAGEANT PAGUBRENIAL SERVICE 19.86
DPS PAG~ 38.28
CURRENT SERVICE 7.83
65.97
02264 PAPEREIREOT, INC. SUPPLIE8 37.93
04976 PATEL, DEWAUBI DUPLICATE STICWER 36.00
04930 PATISSERIE FOOD/RECEPTION 610.00
00123 PEBSCO PAYROLL FOR- 051800 16666.73
PAYROLL FON- 053100 16756.48
33423.21
02285 FEDWESLq & HUBF~ TRANS~R TAX 80.00
02299 P~TLAK, ~ 'A~I~BUBS~.,N~ 85.00
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: S NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 10
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PDSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM RAY 12 2000 TO RAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION A/~OUNT
02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 4.00
MISC EXPENSES 72.68
NISC EXPENSES 6.60
MISC EXPENSES 8.48
MISC EXPENSES 28.47
MISC EXPENSES 33.00
NISC EXPENSES 28.63
MISC EXPENSES 17.14
MISC EXPENSES 23.98
MISC EXPEXSES 64.81
MISC EXPENSES 70.00
MISC EXPENSES 67.98
MISC EXPENSES 9.74
MISC EXPENSES 16.84
MISC EXPENSES 9.27
MISC EXPENSES 16.23
MISC EXPENSES 24.00
MISC EXPENSES 100.00
588.80
02303 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. MEET/TRAIN/SHPP 16.23
MEET/TR~IN/SUPP 52.40
MEET/TRAIN/SUPP 1937
MEET/TRAIN/SUPP 30.00
118.40
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORK~ TRAVEL/SUPP 5.37
TRAVEL/SUPP 5.35
TRAVEL/SUPP 89.03
TRAVEL/SUPP 40.38
TRAVEL & NUPP 2.17
TRAVEL & SUPP 57.05
TRAVEL & SUPP 122.69
TRAVEL i EUPP 13.08
TRAVEL & SUPP 190.66
TRAVEL/SUPP 18.59
TRAVEL/SUPP 164.15
704.52
04978 PtREDA, JOAN CARLOS DUPLICATE STICKER 72.00
04957 POHL, GILBERT REBATE 175.00
00124 POLICE PENSION FUND PAYROLL DR - 051800 14917.31
PAYROLL FOR- 053100 16362.37
31279.68
04921 POPE, ELIZANETN A. PAYRO~ FOR - 051800 923.08
PAVE~L FOR - 053100 923.00
1846.16
02334 UONTRASTEX POS?AGE S~AMPS 330.00
REPORT: APHOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 EUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 i0:20 PAGE 11
RELEASE ID
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPi
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE HOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MAY i2 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEFT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE RESCRI~TION AMOUNT
04954 PRO MIX AUDIO AND LIGHTING SUPPLIES 199.60
02396 ~AONAMK OFFICE PROD & FURE OFFICE SUPPLIES 166.16
OFFICE SUPPLIES 118.90
OFFICE SUPPLIES 132.16
OFFICE SUPPLIES 270.88
688.10
02401 RED WING SHOE STORE PURCHASE OF SAFETY SHOES 340.00
02408 REID AMD ASSOCIATES, JOHN E. PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING 125.00
CHRISTENS 175.00
300.00
02421 RESPOND SYSTONS INV 019345 31.60
04981 RESZEN, SEA~NOM REENB-SHOES 81.36
02423 REVERE PRODUCTS CONCEN~E FILLER 326.75
03950 REOMAR INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 544.64
02430 RIC~ MEDICA~ EQUI~NT LARYNGOSCOPE BLADE 304.40
00424 RUNDELL, ROBERT EXPENSES 79.96
EXPENSES 49.99
REI~ EXPENSES 3.56
RE 1/~ EXPENSES 59.97
193.48
04673 S~ BEENA~DINO COENTY CHILD SUPFO~ PA~E~TS PAYROLL FOR - 051800 211.85
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 211.85
423.70
02491 SAUBER MFO. CO. ALOMINOM DOOR 29.29
02515 SCREEPEN & SONS COFFEE SOPPLINS 111.04
02525 SECRETARY OF STATE LICENSE PLATE RERE%~iS 475.00
00125 REIN L(r~L 73 PAYROLL FOR - 051800 485.00
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 484.50
969.50
02036 SF~/~EEN SRECIALTINS INC. ENAGS/FINS 929.39
PINS 7{9.55
1678.94
04946 SINGI~,
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 12
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRO~ MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRI~TIOM AMOUNT
02559 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATOR ELECTROTATIC KIT 720.86
04936 SKOWRON, MICHAELE REIMB-TICKET 25.00
02591 SPECIALIZED RESCUE SYSTEMS SUPPLIES 818.81
02597 SPORTMART, INC. WORKOUT SHOES 3903.27
02601 SPRING ALIGN PARTS 2280.79
02632 STERLING CODIFIEMS, INC. ZONING BOOKLETS 444.00
02639 STIVERS STAFFING SERVICES SERVICES 4/29 635.63
DATA ENTRY SERVICES 618.68
1254.31
04982 STOSKOPF, ROGER REBATE-PUBLIC WALK 175.00
00441 STRANL, DAVID ADVANCE ~XPENSWE 526.02
04998 STRATEGIES WORESHOP-DEEBY,KAREN 170.00
04996 SUCCESSORIES INC SERVICE POSTERS 469.33
04945 SOM OFFICE FOk~ITURE SUPPLIES 950.00
02672 SYSTL~S FOAMS, INC. LASER CHECKS 229.47
02675 TAPE COMPANY INV 52750610,47469145 934.74
02680 TELETRAC, INC. SEREICE-RAY,2000 1092.00
02691 THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS 495.00
04043 TC~ABZEWSKI, DOLORES SWEIOR/REFEMD 24.00
04276 TREGREEN-OME~/TLAWE SERVICE-WEED CO{q~ROL 105.50
0498B TYRE, JACK REBATE PGBLIC WALK 1TB.00
02?56 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE 06983947 3000.00
00127 ~ITED NAY PAYROLL FOR - OB1800 430.88
RAYRO~ FOR- 0B3100 368.88
799.76
02?69 UPTOWE AUtO SUPPLY BATTERVS 233.40
02800 VIDEO IMAGES, INC. B22829/B22878 210.00
REPAIRS 110.00
320.00
02801 VIKING OFFICE RRO~CTS MISC.OFFIOM SUNPLIE~ 243.31
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE i3
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MAY 12 2000 TO mY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT S.MCELDERtY'S SICK TIME 9234.00
PAYROLL FOR - 051800 17369.09
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 17282.92
SERVICE 7.14
MCAT SHIRTS 54.00
43947.15
04314 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 051600 5.30
PAYROLL FOR - 051600 2.33
PAYROLL FOR - 051600 1.56
PAYROLL FOR - 051800 128792.50
PAYROLL FOR- 051800 18406.97
PAYROLL FOR - 051800 12362.91
PAYROLL FOR - 052700 58.96
PAYROLL FOR - 052900 2924.74
PA~OLL FOR - 053100 158373.49
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 20889.20
PAYROLL FOR - 053100 14030.06
355848.02
04837 VILARGE TROLLEY & TOURS BALANCE DUE 650.00
02819 VITAL RECORD BANC, INC. MICROFILMING 731.22
04940 VOLLER, LYNN REI~ EXPENSES 144.25
02821 TON BRtESEN, HURTELL&ROPER, S. C. SERVICE 7737.59
01228 M.S DAIttEY & CO. FLASHLIGHTS 743.99
01522 W.W. GRAtNGER INC. PORTABLE OIL HEATERS 441.34
02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT OFFICE SUPPLIES 167.55
OFFICE OFFICE 158.30
325.85
02844 WENRGUARD GAit~f~NTS 218.62
SUPPLIES 495.59
GARMENTS 216.01
930.22
0208{ WlRFS INDUSTRIES, INC. INV#17386/17651 4006.04
02893 WOLF CABENA, IRC. PHOTO PROCESSING 35.11
PHOTO PROCESSING 53.20
PHOTO PRCOENSIN~ 29.48
117.79
02096 ~/ORED WIERO~ CLEANING CO WINRO~ ~.SEING SERV 1708.00
00464 WU~BECNER, JEFFREY CI~3~HI~ AI, I/)W 34.d2
RE]]~URSE/{BNT 20.41
REPORT: APBOARREPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:50 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 14
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME IN~OICE DESCRI~TIOM kMOUNT
05.03
TOTAL 795460.19
030
02016 ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY APRIL COLLECTIONS 49613.31
APRIL COLLECTIONS 19404.06
APRIL COLLECTIOMS 29892.28
APRIL COLLECTIONS 2812.00
APRIL COLLECTIONS 9249.19
APRIL COLLECTIONS 27522.00
138492.82
02270 AT&T SERVICE 9.32
01445 FUJITSU BUSINESS C0~4. SYSTEMS INV 800490 52.15
02334 POS?MASTER POSTAGE-BROCEUP~S 2296.63
02448 ROEDA SIGNS INC. YARD WASTE DECALS 1260,80
02536 SE~ENTREN SPECIALTIES INC. SUPPLIES 265.00
TOTAL 142376.72
05O
01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. SIGNAL MAINT 500.00
02167 Ak~OW ROAD CONSTRUCTION STREET P~SUREACING PROGRAM 287114.85
02367 PSI RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS 130.00
TOTAL 287744.85
868
02064 MOTOROLA C(/~6]NICATIOM8 HEATER KIT 880.00 '
TOTAL 880.00
04944 ATLAS RES?OWATIOM SINGLE FAMILY REWAB 15530.00
01377 ~DE~.L ~XRE~NS CORE RERNTC~ 14.44
02052 MORAN~ MPO~A~L J. HINGLE FAMILY RE~.B 200.00
08410 ~SOU~CR CHNTER POR TEE ELREAL J~-MA~CR 43].50
TOTAL 16181.94
38O
04830 II~ ~N~ZIR WOT. AGENCY ~OR ~ 270 P~INCIPAL 30649.02
INT~T 20316.84
ERA I, OAN %1 36490.08
EPA IDAN ~1 23680.65
RE~ORT: APHOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: TDURSDAY JUN0100 t0:20 PAGE 15
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUN~ P~OSRE~
LIST OF BILLS PRESRETRD TO THE BOAD OF TRDSTEES FR~ MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR Nk~E INVOICE DESCRIPTION k~O]NT
111117.39
TO~AL 111117.39
510
02405 B & E PHOTO/VIDEO DUCAM RECORDER 3834.15
04703 CABRETECE CO{~3NICATIONS SERVICE 520.00
04952 CIOREA GROUP INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3035.65
04615 ~RA~K C. CLEMENTS, PRINCIPAL WCA PROJECT 26025.00
02064 MOTOROLA, I~C. MODE~S 5722.00
02670 SWIDERSKI ELECTRONICS INC. DESK~OP WORESTATION 20230.00
TOTAL 59366.80
550
01377 FEDERA~ ~XPRESS CORP AIRDILL 14.44
01827 KLEIN, THORPE A~D JENKINS,LTD. LEGAL FEES 16919.29
02521 SDI CONSULT~S LTD. SERVICES 5809.83
STREETSCAPE PRO~CT 3359.54
9169.37
TOTAL 26103.10
590
02024 MID~EST MOLE, INC. MAPLE/BERESHIRE 43399.36
TOTAL 43399.36
610
04963 RDk~S, SMAWNA REI~E-SDOES 85.00
01071 ADDISON BUILDIMG MATERIAL CO. BUILDING & ~ SUPPLI~ 37.70
BUILDING & ~ SUPRDI~ 135.22
172.92
01773 AME~/C~ WATER WORKS ASSN. ~{BE~HIP-R. O'DO~OVAN 102.60
01780 k~ERITECH H~VION 23.25
04964 A~JO INC. RE~D-OVER[~ 6.46
02270 AT&T S~ICH 621.98
02451 BAD~ FA'~ER INC ~'TER~ 2997.11
01049 CU~ 6OUE~{~/~T, INC ~ ~RIDGE 413.33
REPORT: APBOARDRET GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:50 RUN: TBUESDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 16
RELEARE ID :
VILiAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF SILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM M~Y 12 2000 TO ~Y 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01053 CELLUI~IR ONE - CHICAGO SERVICE 33.41
01097 CINTA$ CORE UNIFO~ RENTAL 282.95
UNIFO~ RENTAL 14426
UNIFUEM RENTAL 6.41
433.62
01313 DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC, RESTORATION ~ATERIAL$ 825.00
01323 EAST JOREkN IRONWORKS FIRE HYDRANT 9082.26
01361 ESRI INC. ~INT AGRELMENT 1025.96
01377 ~EDEiIL EXPRESS CONP EXPRESS ~IL SERVICE 146.63
01445 FUJITSU BUSINESS COEM. SYST~S INV 800490 3389.58
04991 G & M INC. CONCRETE RESTO~TION 1263.52
04970 ttNDLEY, JANICE EXII~B-SHOES 85.00
01544 HBK WATER ~TER SERVICE WATER METER SERV 3420.00
WATER METER SERV 5450.00
8870.00
04972 REIBERG, RENATA WATER REFUND 16.15
RE~ER 1.70
I7.85
03071 ILLINOIS SUPERCONDUCTOR CORE OVEREAIq~ENT 317.73
01896 J.C. LICNT COMPANY PAINTING SUPPLIES 144.91
01427 JOSEPH D. FORNWAN & CO. PVC PIPE/CO~? 708.81
P~TS 4187.00
4895.81
01819 KIEP~ BR~RERS INC. CONCRETE REPAIR SECT 1063.82
01805 LEE, VICTOR REI/~BNRSNW~NT 85.00
04973 LOPATKA, ALqSON REEMB-S~{OES 85.00
04949 MACO ROOF SYSTEMS tNC ROOF REPAIR 485.16
01936 WAIL BOXES ETC. USA UPS ON~E~ FOR 4/2000 201.95
01990 M(~Fi~TER-CARR ~ILITY & TOOL HOLD~ 122.15
02256 PADBOOK FOBLICATIONS, INC. PUBLICATION OF BID ~ICES 27.97
04916 8~O[%OS, ~ ~TER REFB~D 22.61
~ATER ~ND 2.38
.REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY J~N0100 10:20 PAGE 17
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSRE~T
LIST OF 8ILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM ~AY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DRET VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
WATER REFUND 22.61
WATER REFUND 2.38
WATER REFUND 22.61-
WATER REFUND 2.38-
24.99
04977 PEARSON, DORIS WATER 22.61
SS~R 2.38
24.99
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS T~AVEL/SUPP 36.00
T~AVEL/SUPP 13.55
TRAVEL/SUPP 4.15
53.70
04979 PORTER, CHRISTINE ODDIN WATER 54.9I
SE~ER 5.78
60.69
02962 REDWOOD APT. P~TNERS WATER 94.37
SEWER 9.87
104.24
04980 RESCRNE, JOE NEI~B-EHOES 85.00
02536 SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC. OPEN ROUSE PROMOTIONAL 1800.00
OPEN HOUSE PROMOTIONAL 1191.30
SUPPLIES 532.80
3524.10
04983 TEN~EY, ERIC WATEN 29.07
SEWER 3.06
32.13
04984 TEUNAS, VIRGINIA REI~ SHOES 44.76
04986 U?TUN, Ck~OL WATF~ 109.02
S~ 11.56
121.38
02844 W~ARG~A~D ~S 148.73
GAUNENTS 67.28
216.01
03229 W~]L~EUNER, Q~IN S~IC~ ENOVIDED 60.00
TOTAL : 4].376.97
REPORT: APBOARDNTT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 18
RELEASE iD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM ~AY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEFT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
63O
02806 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SERVICE 17.85
UUTAL : 17.85
660
04642 AIRTOUCH PAGING SERVICE 66.94
01795 AMOCO OIL CEMPARY SERVICE 15.20
02270 AT&T SERVICE 34.94
02319 AUTO COLOR SUPPLIES 231.20
02938 BO~N DISTRIBUTION CENTER AUTO PERAIR PARTS & HARDD.~ 637.43
01006 BUSRE CAR WASH, INC. CAR WASHES 677.25
01058 CENTURY LABS, INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 75.20
01236 DAVE & JIM'S AUTO BODY, iNC. RECHARGE A/C SYSi~-POLICE 75.00
RAPLACE AIR CONDITIONING 128.18
WHEEL ALIGNMENT ?5 145.00
348.18
01445 FUJITSU BUSINESS COEM. SYSTEMS IRV 800490 156.44
01511 ~OODy~R SERVICE STORES TIRES 526.08-
TIRES 526.08
TIRES 526.08
526.08
01750 INTERSTATE BATTERY tNTERETATE BATT~Y 89.95
01872 I,%TTOF CNDfROLET, INC. REFAIR SUEP 1243.11
REPAIR SUPF 493.00
FARTS 111930
2855.81
01909 LUBE OILS INC SERVICE 715.81
02059 MORTON GROVE AUTEMUTIVE ~$T ANTO REFAIR P~S 210.00
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL/$DPP 8.69
02355 PRO FINISH PAINT EE~'~%~T 298.50
02374 ~ASITY DISCO{i%~T AUTO F~TS AUTO REPAIR ~S 853.59
02402 ~EDI-STRIF SAMD~LAS? 918.00
SAMDBAAST 1026.00
1944.00
REPORT: AREOARDRPT G~ERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 19
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESRETED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FREM MaY 12 2000 TO MAY 3i 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NANE INVOICE DESCRIFTION
02484 SAFETY KLREN CORPORATION SERVICE AND CLEANING 448.65
02525 SECRETARY OF STATE LICENSE PLATE RENEWALS 156.00
02575 SNAP-EM INDUSTRIAL UPGEADKS 329.25
UPGRADES 404.96
SOORE? 35.06
769.27
02581 SOLVENT SYSTEMS IN~'L. INC. RE,VICE 204.00
04101 SPI DISTRIBUTION INC. AC COMPRESSOR HOSE 54.42
BATTERY 194.57
248.99
02684 TEP~{{CE SUPPLY COMPANY CYLINDER RENTAL 3.00
02711 T~ADE MARE G~PNICS, INC. SUPPLIES 535.00
02769 UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY AC DELCO REPAIR 877.31
WATER P~P 191.92
1069.23
02913 ZIEBANT RUSTPROOF 350.00
TOTA~ : 12929.35
670
04939 CERTIFIED PO{~KR INC TANKS 2805.87
04995 REGIONA~ TRUCK & EQUIP YEW 2718,2734,2749 5865.00
04951 SO~UREAN ACCE~TS INC. II'~TE~ING AND G~AEUICS P-15 275.00
04937 ~ST CEMTRA~ MONICIPA~ CONFEr{Bi'CE S~¥ICE FEE 450.00
02913 ZIE~RT SERVICE 215.00
TO~A~ : 9610.87
690
01102 CITIBANK, N.A. C~AIM$-GAN 37450.49
INS C~il{~-DAN 31087.70
68538.19
01238 NA~E & JIM'S AUTO BODY, INC. BODY ~PAI~ 4419.38
01306 DRUG CARl), INC.. CARD CI, AIMS 10553.71
01451 GAN ROBINS W.A. INC DEPOSIT INCREASE 12000.00
01966 MaR~IN BUYER C(3{{PANV, INC C~44~ ~ 37809.87
REPORT: APROEXDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 20
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MAY 12 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NEX VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION MOUNT
02441 RISK RESOURCES PROFESSIOMAL SERVICES 1249.50
TO?AL 134570.65
710
01027 CAPITAL GAINS INC. INVEST SERV-MAY 2202.00
04959 DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE ANNUAL FILING FEE 1999.36
01868 LASALLE NATIONA~ BANK INV 4002602000/4002604000 1027.50
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 052400 7994.73
04314 VILLAGE OF MO~ PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 052400 16612.09
TOTAL 29835.76
720
01027 CAPITAL GAINS INC. INVEST SENV-MAY 2717.00
04959 DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE A~NUAL FILING FEE 2154.76
01868 LASALLE NATIONAL BANK INV 400328600/4002600000 1206.35
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 052300 7363.32
04314 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 052300 13975.55
TOTAl 27416.98
730
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 052700 344.28
04314 VI~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 052700 200.00
TOTA~ 544.28
770
02941 ACEXEXA~, DANIEL R. FLEX COMP 816.58
01042 ADAMCZYK, TED D. FLEX C~P 393.33
02948 RRC~RER, ILANA FLEX C~P 500.00
02949 BRO~SS~U, ANDRE~ J. FLEX C~P 1116.34
04672 BROWiI, STYE FLEX C~P 316.00
03756 BEXDICK, ~NT B. FLEX COMP 133.98
03760 B~B, PAUL FLEX U~P 192.00
03761 BIRG~, DOMALD L. F~EX C~P 1860.22
01035 CARNEY, MAUREEX ~EX COMP 104.26
01072 CHERWIN, RA~IDY R. ~ COMP 364.50
REPORT: AREOARDRPT GENE~%TED: 5 NOV 99 i5:58 ~DN: THURSDAY J~N0100 I0:20 PAGE 21
REL~SE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOU~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESEF~ED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FRON MaY 12 2000 TO MaY 31 2000
DER VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION MOUNT
01190 COke, TEREENCE J. FLEX COMP 4!4.00
01219 DABLSERG, JOHN K. FLEX COMP 151.00
01224 DALE!', JANICE A. FLEX COMP i58.00
01241 DAWSON, HENRY C. FLEX COMP 279.51
01297 DEAF,NE, RICNARD L. FLEX COME 530.16
04840 E~S, MARGARET FLEX COMP I7L49
01382 FEXT~, BAREARA L. FLEX COME 258.00
01418 EXORY, JA~ES M. FLEX COMP 721.25
01421 FOLEY, APRIL B. FLEX COMP 461.60
FLEX COMP 1875.06
2336.66
01484 GIBSON, ROBERT J. FLEX COMP 584.43
01540 ~EX~HEX, JAMES E. FLEX COMP 740.00
04731 ~, JEFFERY FLEX COMP 604.00
01771 JEPSON, DAVID C. FLEX COMP 100.10
01781 JONES, DAMIEL G. FLEX COMP 960.00
01836 KOTLARZ, A}ITHONY J. FLEX COMP 544.00
01844 ~UPA, ~HANK M. FLEX COMP 9.00
01852 LABBE, ~ L. FLEX COMP 523.00
01805 DOEX, ~LMA W. FLEX COMP 305.32
01908 LURASH, DOOGLAS D. FLEX COMP 309.50
04933 IiCELDERRY, SYLVIA FLEX COMP 79.30
02033 MII~LER, DAVID L. FLEX COMP 1390.00
02431 RICMARDSON, ROMALD E. FLEX COME 106.40
02433 RIC~ZR, JEFFREY FLEX COMP 97.00
02473 PJ3I{O~E, CI61DY .3'0 FLEX C~P 591.73
02480 RZEFF.~zCI, ROBERT L. FLEX CC{{P 100.00
02508 SCIIU~YZ, WAI/i'EP, A FLEX COMP~ 138.11
02644 ~TEXH~, DAVID F~X COMP 232.00
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 10:20 PAGE 22
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM MAY i2 2000 TO MAY 31 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME I~OICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02710 TRACY, RICHARD L. FLEX COMp 591.91
02729 TRUTY, CHRIS J. FLEX COMP 289.41
02825 WADE, MaRILYN FLEX COMP 29.00
02853 WERDERITCH, RANDALL C. FLEX COMP 431.23
TOTAL 19624.80
790
04960 BO~ER, MARY LYNN EXPENSES 37.15
02945 BRISTOL COURT TEENS/PARENTS LUNCHEON 1422.50
04969 CHAPPEL5, BARBARA RE~0ND 36.00
01151 C~NITY CONSOLIDATED REIMBUR$~MENP 440.55
00350 HUEMaNN, ANTHONY Map LAMINATION 90~75
04947 TCI OVERPAYMENT 54.00
02689 THIS DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT BOND MONEY 850.00
MaY5 BOND MONEY 550.00
BOND MONEY 3645.00
BOND MONEY 900.00
MaY8 BOND MONEY 1406.00
7351.00
00128 VII&AGE OF MO{~NT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 052700 6815.32
$60 POT IN TRUST 60.00
DISBURS~NT 6310.00
DISBO~EI~f14T 50,00
13235.32
02854 ~ERNER, MICHAEL T, SUPPLIES 68.72
TOTAL 22735.99
83O
04324 BANK O~E SSA#6 INTEP, F, ST 7077.50
TOTAL 7077.50
GklND TOTAL 1788371.35
GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 i5:58 RUN: THURSDAY JUN0100 !0:20 PAGE 23
RELEASE !D :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT REOSRECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
~0~ MY 12 2000 TO ~AY 31 2000
S~ANY BY FUND
001 GENEREL F~ND 795460.19
030 RE~SE DISPOSAL FUND 142376.72
050 MOTOR ~EL TAX FUND 287744.85
060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 880.00
070 CO~UNITY REVELP~T BLOCK G~T 16181.94
380 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 111117.39
510 CAPITAL IMPREV~ENT FUND 59366.80
550 DO~'~OWN REDEVLP~T CONST 26103.10
590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FOND 43399.36
610 ~ATER AND SE~R FUND 41376.97
630 FANKING SYST~ REVENUE FUND 17~85
660 VEHICLE ~AINTENA~CE FUND 12929.35
670 VEHICLE REPLAC~ENT FOND 9610.87
690 RISK ~ANE~ENT FUND 134570.65
710 POLICE PENSION FUND 29835.76
720 FIRE PENSION FUND 27416.98
730 BENEFIT TRUST 92 FUND 844.28
770 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 19624.80
790 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 22735.99
830 SSA ~6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 7077.50
TOTA~: 1788371.36
PR 0 CLAMA TION
UNITED STATES ARMY WEEK
JUNE 12 - 18, 2000
WHEREAS, the United States Army was established by the First Continental Congress on
the 14th day of June, 1775; and
WHEREAS, the United States Army exists to defend the freedom of our citizens and our
nation's security interests; and
WHEREAS, many citizens of Mount Prospect have served their nation and given the
ultimate sacrifice in defense of our freedoms, as members of the United States Army; and
WHEREAS, it is proper to recognize the United States Army annually on its birthday, and
to thank those who have served, and those who are presently serving.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do
hereby designate June 14th as the United States Army's 225th birthday, and declare the
period from June 12th through June 18th, 2000 as
UNITED STATES ARMY WEEK
and l exhort all citizens to join with me in this salute as we express our gratitude to those
who have served and those who are now serving to protect our nation and its freedoms.
GeraM L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Dated this 6t~ day of June, 2000.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: JUNE 1,2000
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING NORTHWEST TRANSIT CORRIDOR
FEASIBILITY STUDY
As you are aware, the Villages of Schaumburg, Rosemont, Elk Grove Village and
Hoffman Estates and the City of Rolling Meadows have joined together to partially fund
a Study looking at the feasibility of extending transit opportunities in the region's
Northwest Corridor. Recently, the Regional Transportation Authority (RTA)
recommended further study of corridor opportunities. The Northwest Municipal
Conference also supports this effort and the project is included in its Long-Range
Transportation Plan.
The Village of Schaumburg is asking local municipalities to pass Resolutions of support
to further bolster the likelihood that the next phase of study be undertaken. A show of
support does not bind Mount Prospect to any current or future financial contribution.
The Village could, however, benefit from an extension of some type of transit corddor
with the possible location of a station at the Elmhurst Road overpass at 1-90. The
southern end of Mount Prospect contains a predominant amount of the Village's light
industrial and commercial businesses. The ability to attract workers with affordable,
efficient mass transportation would be a substantial plus for the long-term viability of this
important sector of the Village's economic base.
It is recommended that the Village Board adopt the attached Resolution of support.
MEJ/rcc
c: Community Development Director William Coohey
VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG
MUNICIPAL CENTER / 101 SCHAUMBURG COURT / SCHAUMBURG, IL 60193-1899
847/895-4500 / TDD 92%4435 / FAx 895-7806 / WWW.CI.SCHAUMBURG.IL.US
May 24,2000
NORTHWEST TRANSIT CORRIDOR FEASIBILITY STUDY UPDATE
· May 2, 2000, the PTA presented proposed findings for the Feasibility Study to their
Planning Committee. This presentation was in advance of the Policy Committee's final
meeting.
· The RTA reviewed the findings and recommendations to be proposed to the Study's Policy
Committee.
· The PTA is recommending the federally prescribed Alternatives Analysis and that Light
Rail, Heavy Rail and Bus Rapid Transit look the most promising options and should be
further analyzed. They also recommend preservation ora transit envelope within the 1-90
right of way.
· Attached is a summary of the information released at the Planning Committee Meeting.
· Additionally, the Village of Schanmburg has reviewed the study numbers based on FTA
evaluation criteria. The following is a summary o£our analysis based on the study numbers
presented.
Option LRT HR BRT
Annualized Capital Cost $56.3m $60.2m $33.0m
Annualized O&M $24.0m $78.0m $34.0m
Total Annualized Cost $80.3m $138.2rn $67.0m
New Transit POder 39.5k 44k 29.7k
CostperNewRider ~ $3.14 $2.26
The key factors determining the differences are:
I. Heavy rail has the highest number of new riders, but significantly higher capital and operating costs.
2. /Jght rail has new rider numbers dose to heavy rail and much lower operating costs.
3. Bus rapid transit has much lower capital costs even though it has the lowest new rider numbers.
The Final Policy Committee Meeting for the Feasibility Study is scheduled for June 6, 2000.
S:kPLANNINGkLEANNE~BLUELINELNWMC Summary 0500
PROGRESS THROUGH THOUGHTFUL PLANNING
05/01/00 WON 14:00 F~ 1 312 917 0846 I~EGIONAL TRANSPORTATION ~003
'RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARY
NORTitWEST CORRIDOR TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY
The Northwest Corridor Transit Feasibility Study examined the transportation needs of tl.e
corridor extending from em of O'Hare Airport, west to the Cook County line in order o
evaluate options for knproved t~ansit service. The travel market analysis identified ~ o
primary corridor transportation needs: improving access to jobs and major activity centers :n
the corridor, and expanding the limited number of alternatives to auto for those traveling ~o
destinations west of 0bHare Airport To address these transportation needs, 21 transpertatic n
alternatives were initially developed and screened. Alternatives less viable w~e eliminate, L,
and desirable features from different alternatives were combined, resulting in eight
alternatives for detailed evaluation.
The two main study findings are:
· Further study of corridor transit improvement alternatives is warranted. The Uaw:l
demand forecasts for the alternatives indicate significant potential for uanit ridershi ~
and resulting auto diversions in the corridor, especially for commuting ~ps to woti:.
This indicates that those trausit alternatives are addressing the transportation needs cf
improved access to jobs and expanding modal options for those traveling to the area wa t
of O'Hare Airport. Furthermore, the forecasted 2020 transit ridership levels for th~
alternatives are comparable to current ridersh/p levels on similar transit modes in th;
region Due to the constrained financial resources for transportation improvements, th:
benefits of these alternatives must be compared to their capital and operating costs.
evaluation of the alternatives indicates potential opportunities for improving the cosl-
effectiveness oft_he alternatives. Similarly, there are potential opportunities to reduce
environmental impacts of the alternatives.
· Preservation of a trcrnsit envelope in the 1-90 Northwest ToIlway right-of-way ir
warranted. The evaluation indicates' that all of the most promising txansit improveme= t
altematlves use the 1-90 (Northwest Tollway) right-of-way. As part of future capacit?
expansion plans for 1-90, consideration should be given to preserving a transk envelop
within the 1-90 right~of--~,y that would be used for implementation of a transit
improvement alternative. Similarly, as part of current planning for improved O'FL~
Airport access, consideration should be given to preserving transit options along 1-190
from the CTA Rosemont Blue Line station to the vicinity of the Wisconsin Central in
order to facilitate the development of potential future rail improvements in the Northwest
Corridor.
The more capital intensive Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), Light Rail Transit (LRT), and HeaE' '"
Rail Transit CrlRT) alternatives using the 1-90 right-of-way show the most promising result~
in addressing the corridor transportation needs of improved access to corridor jobs and
activity centers, and providing mobility alternatives for travel west of O'Hare Airport. The~
alternatives also have the slzongest forecasted increase in transit trips, the potential
promote transit-oriented development, and the largest air quality benefits. These alternative:;
compare favorably from a ridership and cost perspective with proposed transit new starts il~
05/01/00 EON 14:01 FA~ 1 312 917 0846 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION ~004
other metropolitan areas across the country, and as such, they should be competitive f¢ r
future federal funding,
The following table summarizes key evaluation m~a~ures, extracted from a mo~
compreherLsive presentation. This table compa.r~s the ~ltemafives on a more equivalent hasi:,.
For the purposes of this comparison, it was a~sumed that the western terminu~ of th~
exclusive 1-90 guideway facilities was 1-90 at Meacham Road·
Comparison of Alternatives and Refinement Options
-'~t, ,-I~L..~,' · N ,., ~(' --I . _ .. .p..
_x~rese ~ ..,, ........... , .... , .....
HOV Lane Express B~s~ 10,000 $160 mil. $24 mil
HOV Lane Carpools~ (AM peak) 2,400 yah,
BRT To 1-90/Meacham~ 55,000 $390 mil ~34 mi[.
LRT via 1-90 to 1-90/Meacham 42,60~ $6~0 mit. $24 mil
HRT to 1-90/Meacham 52,000 $720 mil. $78 mil.
;ommuler Rail to 1-90/Meacham 6,500 $380 mil. $40 mil.
2 ]iO¥=HlSh Occupancy Yebicl¢s (such a~ c~mools), BET=Bus P~pkl Tnmsl~, LP.T=LIgh~ Rail Tmask,
P. lgb. t-of-wa¥ preservation for transit should be considered for this conidor. This should
include £etainin~ an adequate t~a:asit envelope ~t the futa~¢ widening and ~econslruction
the 1-90 NortEwest Tollw~y. Also, the plam~ed addition of collectar-dist~butor ~oadv~.
and ramps along 1-190 in Rosemont should be designed to not preclude a futttre tramit
connection from the eTA. P. osemont station to the ~isconsin Central corridor. Coordi~sti¢ n
of majo~ ~eco~stmction and expans[un Frojects with the transportation asencies responsib
for majo~ road faoil[ties in thc corridor anct local Sovemments ~esponsible for land us;,
should be pursued in t~ms of poten'd, al opportunities for traz~it d§ht-of-w~y pr~ervation :n
the corridor.
Transit suppordv~ la~d use will be a key succe{s compoz~ent of any major tramit
~mpto~¢ment. It is important that serious co~s[d¢ration of la~d ttses and right-of-w~
p~eSClW'a, tioll to accommodate ti'allOt be ~t part of ftlrthel'.studi~s, "J['l'a~slt sttpporti¥¢ land
actio~3s will also b~ rec!tz[red in order to compete for federal discretional7 funding.
Fu~.ber studies should be conducted to refine and select a pm£er~ed option(s). Tltis ne(t
effort should also include planning for transit suppol~d~¢ development, a flna~cial analysis,
and refined tra~eI demand modeling.
05/03/00 WED 10:32 FAX 1 312 9~? 0846 REGIONAL TP, ANSPORTATION ~008
5/30~00
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING CONTINUED STUDY
FOP, THE NORTHWEST TRANSIT CORRIDOR
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect supports the concept of transit in the Northwest Corridor
and creation of a high capacity, high quality transit service for the corridor; and
WHEREAS, the Northwest Corridor Transit Feasibility Study nearing completion shows potential
positive transportation benefits to the area; and
WHEREAS, there should be additional study in this corridor and an Alternatives Analysis should be
completed to identify a single locally preferred alternative; and
WHEREAS, employment in the corridor is expected to increase 48% by the year 2020; and
WHEREAS, there are limited transit options in the corridor and the roadway network is either at, or
over, capacity; and
WHEREAS, reil service is likely to generate a substantial number of riders and cause suburbanites
to use transit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
endorse further study of the Northwest Corridor and endorse an Alternatives Analysis for the Corridor.
SECTION TWO: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,.~/
DATE: MAY 12, 2000 F.~'
SUBJECT: ZBA-10o2000 - 507 S. W1LLE STREET - VARIATION TO PERMIT A 672 S.
GARAGE.
KEVIN AND LAURIE DUFFY - APPLICANTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered a request for a Variation to permit an oversized detached garage at its meeting of
April 27, 2000. The proposal is a request for a Variation for a 672 square foot detached garage that would exceed the 600
square foot maximum permitted size for detached garages. The garage would be located to the rear of the existing house
at 507 S. Wille Street. The proposal is described in detail in the attached ZBA staffmemo.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed Variation in terms of Zoning Code Variation Standards and voted 3-
2 to approve the proposed Variation to permit a 672 square foot detached garage for the residence at 507 S. Wille Street,
Case No. ZBA-11-2000. Section 5.503.C.2.a(2) requires four (4) positive votes for the ZBA to approve a Variation.
Thus, the proposed Variation was denied. The applicant has appealed that decision to the Village Board.
William J Cooney, AICP, Director of Community Development
H:RFsI~'~A 2000~M~ Memos~A-10-2000 Memo (Duffy - Crarage).do~
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNE~_///~22>
DATE: APRIL 21, 2000
HEARING DATE: APRIL 27, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-10-2000- 507 S. WII,I,E STREET
VARIATION TO PERMIT A 672 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-CAR DETACHED
GARAGE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Kevin M. and Laurie L. Duffy
507 S. Wille Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owners of the Property
Parcel Number: 08-12-308-017
08-12-308-018
Lot Size: 11,775 square feet
Existing Zoning: IL4. Single Family Residence
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
Lot Coverage: 16% existing
32% proposed
50% maximum per RA district
Requested Action: Proposal for a Yariation to the maximum size reqfftrement for garages to allow construction of a
672 square foot, two-ear garage.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE VARIATION
'I~ subject property is an existing home located on a 75' X 157' (11,775 square feet) single-family lot on a
residential street. The home currently has an existing single-ear, detached garage and an unimproved driveway.
The petitioner is seeking to construct a 672 square foot two-ear garage to replace the existing garage and add an
18' wide concrete driveway to the garage. Section 14.306.B.1 sets the raaximum size for detached garages at
600 square feet. In order to accommodate his proposed garage, the petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow the
proposed garage to exceed the 600 square foot m~imum size requirement. The site and tl3e proposed garage
would meet all other Zoning Code bulk regulations.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey
and site plan and visited the site.
ount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Meeting of April 27, 2000
ZBA-10-2000 Page 2
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Standards for Variations
Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect
Zoning Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation.
These standards relate to:
A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property
not generally applicable to other properf~es in the same zoning district and not created by any person
presently having an interest in the property;
c~ lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
o protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The subj eot parcel is a 11,775 square foot parcel that is relatively level, out of any flood zone and rectangular.
The parcel is developed with a single family home and a detached garage. The applicant proposes to construct a
large two-car garage.
The reasons for the proposed Variation are primarily for the convenience of the petitioner, rather than financial.
The petitioner proposed the oversized garage to accommodate vehicles and adffxtional storage area. Although
the garage is somewhat oversized, the character of the neighborhood - a single-family residential area - would
not be affected by the proposed Variation, nor would the proposed Variation have any significant effect on the
public welfare.
Notwithstanding the above, no particular condition of the lot, makes the proposed Variation for a 672 square
foot garage necessary. The petitioner simply would like to have a larger garage than in permitted by code. This
is not sufficient justification for a Variation by the above standards.
As you will recall, the Zoning Board of Appeals considered case number ZBA-35-99, a request for a
Conditional Use and Variations to allow construction of a 720 square foot, three-ear, detached garage at1712
Martha Lane at its meeting of January 27, 2000. At that time, the ZBA voted 4-1 to recommend denial of that
proposal. A~er receiving that recommendation and considering the item at several meetings, the Village Board
ultimately approved a 672 square foot, two~car garage for the property.
RECOMiVIENDATION
Although the proposed Variation would not have a significant effect 'on the public welfare or neighborhood
character, the submittal does not support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section
14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA deny the
pro, posed Variation to permit a 672 square foot garage for the residence at 507 S. Wille Street, Case No. ZBA-
1,0:2000. The Zoning Board's decision is final for this ease.
I concur:
William .Ir. Cooney, AI~CP, Director of Community Development
\\VH~V02~D~ M DEV~G EI~P LN~I5 A~ZBA 2000~taffM~x~ZBA-10-2000 Mem~ (D~t~- C,~rage).fl~
Pine Street
W~e S~eet
Ma~ S~eet
Emerson Street
~ Maple S~et
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-10-2000 Hearing Date: April 27, 2000
PETITIONER: Kevin M. and Laurie L. Duffy
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 507 S. Wille St.
PUBLICATION DATE: April 10, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Variation to permit a 672 square foot, two-car, detached garage
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Flores
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARI'IES: Kevin and Laurie Duffy
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the March 23, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000 were postponed to the May 25, 2000
meeting. Ms. Suracek introduced Case ZBA-10~2000, a request for a Variation to permit a 672 square foot, two-car,
detached garage.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices,
and through signage on the property. He indicated this request was for a Variation to permit a 672 square foot, wvo-
car, detached garage.
Mr. Perkins provided background on the ease and briefly discussed the required findings for Variations. He then stated
that no hardship, as defined by the Zon'mg Ordinance, exists for the proposal and gave Staff's recommendation of
denial for the proposed Variation. He went on to describe a recent ease involving a proposed Variation for an
oversized garage. He stated that the ZBA had denied a Variation for a 720 s.f. garage at 1712 Martha Lane, but that
the Village Board approved a eempromise proposal of a 672 s.f. garage upon consideration of an appeal of the ZBA
decision.
MS. Juraeek asked for questions from the Board. Richard Rogers asked if the request was for a 672 s.f. garage because
of the recent approval of that size garage by the Village Board. Mr. Perkins said he was not aware of that being the
reason, the applicant would need to address that question.
Kevin Duffy was sworn in and replied to Mr. Rogers that was not the reason for the requested size, he had not known
about the case until he received Staffs memo in the mail. He arrived at that size by configuring what he needed to
house his cars and a small workshop. He said he had purchased his home about one year ago and wanted to replace the
one-car garage as the first of many planned improvements. Mr. DuiT~ said he was requesting the larger size garage
because he wanted space in the garage for a workbench to do household repairs. He did have that arrangement at his
old house in Sehaumburg.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 10,2000
Arlene Juraeak, Chairperson Page 2
Mr. Floros asked if he planned to put a new driveway and a new garage in the same area as at present, Mr. Duffy said
it would be within one to three feet of the present one. He will build the new garage himself, to Code. His lot is
75'x157'.
Ms. Juracek asked if he had heard any objections to the project from his neighbors. Mr. Dully said he had spoken with
them and they did not voice any objections·
Mr. Youngquist asked about the drawing that was submitted; stating that he thought that the proposed garage location
may be too close to the existing house, which might limit future expansions of the home. He added that the applicant
may want to move the garage closer to the lot line, so as to leave more expansion area. Mr. Duffy said he had prepared
the rough drawing, not to scale, and that he planned to build the garage close to the 5' setback required by code·
Several Board members said there have been so many requests to build larger garages that perhaps the Village
Ordinance needs to be changed to accommodate modem social and community standards.
Mr. Floros asked what was the logic the Village Board used to grant the request for the garage at Martha Lane. Mr.
Perkins said he was not present at that meeting but was given the impression that the Village Board thought the 672 s.f.
was a fair compromise between the allowable size and the 720 s.f. that petitioner had requested of the Zoning Board.
Mr. Floros said that if a new standard of 672 s.f. is being set by the Village Board, perhaps Code should be changed to
those dimensions, rather than hearing these requests repeatedly. Mr. Perkins said the Village Board had approved a
similar size garage last year on Prospect Manor Avenue. He also stated a three-car detached garage could be built with
a Conditional Use under the Zoning Ordinance, but that such a garage would also require approval of a Variation for
the size of the garage. Mr. Perkins voiced the opinion that a garage of more than 600 s.f. should be a Conditional Use,
as are three-ear garages.
Elizabeth Luxem said this ease must be heard under today's Code and the Zoning Board does not have the authority to
grant a Conditional Use per the present standards. Ms. Luxem said that, while the Village Board has the prerogative of
approving such requests, the Zoning Board does not.
Ms. Juracek agreed with Jeff Perkins that garages exceeding the 600 s.f. limit should be a Conditional Use.
At 7:55 p.m., Elizabeth Luxem made a motion to grant approval for Case ZBA-10-2000, a request for a Variation to
permit a 672 square foot, two-ear, detached garage. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Youngquist, Juracek
NAYS: Luxem, Rogers
Motion was denied 3-2, because the Zoning Ordinance requires four affirmative votes for a positive recommendation.
At 8:45 p~m., after the Board reviewed three more eases, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by
Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting wa~ adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
VWL
5/22~00
5/31/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 507 SOUTH WILLE STREET
WHEREAS, Kevin and Laurie Duffy (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioners") have filed a
petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 507 South Wille Street
(hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property") and legally described as follows:
Lot 1, Duffy's Resubdivision of Lot 4 and the north ~ of Lot 5 in Block 7 in
Prospect Park Subdivision Number 1, being a subdivision of the W~ of the
north 60 rods of the SW¼ of Section 12, Township 41, North, Range 11, East
of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Variation to construct a 672 square-foot, two-car
detached garage; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of
ZBA Case No. 10-00 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect
on the 27~ day of April, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the
Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 10"* day of April, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the
request for a Variation from Section 14.306.B.1 of Chapter 14 (Zoning) for the Subject
Property at their regular meeting on April 27,2000, said request being the subject of ZBA
10-2000, and voted 3-2 in support of the Petitioners' request; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Page 2/2
507 S. Wille Street
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant, by a vote of 5-2 at their regular meeting of May 16, 2000, a variation, as
provided in Section 14.203.C.6 of the Village Code, to allow the construction of a 672
square foot, two-car detached garage, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MAY 12, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-12-2000- 1500 E. EUCLID AVENUE ~'~
VARIATION TO PERMIT A 120' PERSONAL WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ~
FACILITY AT WIESS MEMORIAL PARK
AVESHA ZAHEER OF VOICESTREAM COMMUNICATIONS (PETITIONER)
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Variation for a 120' tall monopole
antenna at the northwest comer of Euclid Avenue and Wolf Road. The proposed monopole is described
in the attached staff memorandum. The ZBA discussed the proposal at length including the following
items:
co-location cfa Prospect Heights Fire Department relay station on the pole;
existing monopoles and antennas in the area and their heights;
provisionsoftheTeleeommunicationsActof1996;
t2 possible alternative locations for the proposed monopole;
the appearance and location of the proposed monopole; and
possible visual impact of the proposed monopole, which the ZBA felt would be minimal.
One resident had questions regarding the proposal, but did not speak against or in favor of the Variation.
Following their discussion of the item, the ZBA voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the proposed
Variation to permit the construction of a 120' monopole antenna at 1500 E. Euclid Avenue, Case No.
ZBA-12-2000.
LT~Wllllam $ Co,Lt. ey Jr, AIC?
.tjp
~\VI~V02~DEI~COMD~LNG~SA',ZBA 2000~M~ Memos~ZBA-12-2~0 (Voicestream) me.j memo.d~
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNER~
DATE: APRIL 21, 2000
HEARING DATE: APRIL 27, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-12-2000, VARIATION TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN 120-FOOT
TALL MONOPOLE PERSONAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICTION
FACILITY AT THE MARVIN WEISS COMMUNITY CENTER.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Ayesha Zaheer
Cook Inlet/Voicestream PCS L.L.C.
1375 E. Woodfield Road, Suite 4000
Schaumburg, IL 60173
Property Owner: Pdver Trails Park District
1500 E. Euclid Avenue
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Lessee of a portion of the subject property
Lot Size: 18.9 acres
Existing Zoning: CR Conservation Recreation
Existing Land Use: Existing Community Center and Park
Requested Action: Petitioner is seeking a Variation to permit construction of a one hundred and twenty
foot (120') tall monopule personal wireless telecommunication facility.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The subject property is an existing community center and park, located near the northwest comer of Euclid
Avenue and River Road. The applicant is proposing to construct an one hundred and twenty-foot (120') tall
~nonopole personal wireless communication facility on the subject property. The structure would be located at
the rear of the property, near thc existing driving range. The monopolc would take the place of an existing 35'
light pule serving the driving range.
Section 14.311 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code, which regulates personal wireless
telecommunication facilities, permits monopole structures up to 70' in height in the CR Conservation Recreation
zoning district. The proposed facility is a 120' monopole, and would therefor exceed the maximum permitted
height by 50'. The applicant states that the additional height is necessary to allow for transrr~ission of the signals
from the'proposed antermas over the existing trees in the park, which are up to 80 feet in height. The antennas
on thc proposed monopole would be at a centerline height of 110' with the additional height in the form of a
lightning rod at the top of the pole.
BA 12-2000 Variation for Weiss Community Center - Personal Wireless Telecommunication Facility
Meeting of April 27, 2000
Page 2
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's submitted information and
visited the subject site.
Among the Village's requirements for personal wireless telecommunication facilities is that new facilities be co-
located with existing facilities, wherever possible. In particular, the Village requires that the applicant document
that the proposed facility cannot be co-located with any existing facility within Va mile of the subject property.
The subject property is located in an area developed with low-rise structures. The nearest existing pole facility
is at the corner of Euclid Avenue and River Road, approximately 1 mile from the subject property. The
multiple-story office buildings at Kensington Road and Feehanville Road are approximately Va mile from the
subject property.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Variation Standards:
Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.203C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning
Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. These
standards relate to:
ca A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property
not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person
presently having an interest in the property;
rn lack of desire to increase financial gain; and
ca protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character.
The proposed Variation is to prevent the existing trees on the subject property from interfering with the
monopole's transmissions. While the height of the trees on the property could be considered a hardship due to
the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property, the trees could be
trimmed or removed to facilitate transmissions from a permitted 70' monopole. While the property owner will
derive a financial benefit from the proposed facility, the proposed Variation is related to operatienal
requirements for the facility, rather than financial considerations. As previously discussed the area in which the
facility is proposed is a predominantly single-family area with low-rise structures. Thus, the proposed 120'
facility could have a significant effect on public welfare, other properties, and neighborhood character. There is
not sufficient justification for a Variation by the above standards.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed variation may have a significant effect on public welfare and the submittal does not support a
finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance.
Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Z~A make a recommendation of denial of the proposed
height Variation to permit an 120' monopole at 1500 Euclid Avenue, Case No. ZBA-12-2000. The Village
l~oard's deeisiun is final for this ease.
I concBr,
William J. Cooney, Sr., AIC?
Director of Community Development
\\V H~V02'~DEPT~OM DEV~}EN',P LNG'~ZBA~ZBA 2000~$taff Mcmos~ZBA- 12-2000 (Weiss).doc
T/LiGHTNING ROD
~_(9) vo, c[
QNORTH ELEVATION (LOOKING SOUTH)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-12-2000 Hearing Date: April 27, 2000
PETITIONER: Ayesha Zaheer for
Cook tnle/~/'oieestream PCS L.L.C.
1375 E. Woodfield Rd., Ste. 4000
Schaumburg, IL 60173
PROPERTY OWNER: River Trails Park District
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1500 E. Euclid Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE: April I0, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Variation to permit construction of a 120-foot tall monopole personal wireless
telecommunication facility at the Marvin Weiss Community Center
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Ayesha Zahaer
Charity Sullivan
Gr~am Packer
Dan Leary
Darren Davidsen
Robert and Traci Jaeobson
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the Maroh 23, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000 were postponed to the May 25, 2000
meeting. At 8:00, after hearing two other eases, Ms. Suracek introdaced Case ZBA-12-2000, a Variation to permit
construetlon of a 120-foot tall monopole personal wireless telecommunication facility at the Marvin Weiss Community
Center.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the ease, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices,
and through signage on the property. He indicated this request was for a Variation to permit construction of a 120-foot
tall monopole personal wireless telecommunication facility at the Marvin Weiss Community Center
Mr. Perkins dislributed additional information presented by the apprzcant to the Zoning Board. He then described the
proposed location of the facility as replacing one of the :existing light poles for the driving range at the park. He then
talked briefly about the required findings for Variations and restated Staff's position that, although the trees on the site
could be considered a hardship, they are not part of the "partioular physical surroundings, shape, or wpographicel
conditions" of the property. Therefore, no hardship justifying the proposed Variation exists. He then gave staff's
recommendation to deny the proposed Variation.
Chairperson Arlene Juracek pointed out that the reference to Section 14.311 .should have been 14.313.
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA- 12-2000
Arlene Jurac~k, Chairperson Page 2
Richard Rogers noted the Prospect Heights Fire Department would be using this monopole for relay.
Ms. Juracek inquired if there were other monopoles this high inthe area. Mr. Perkins responded that the monopole in
Mount Prospect Commons is the same height as the proposed monopole and was approved as a Conditional Use when
it was erected. He also said there is an antenna structure approximately this height at the former TCI site.
Ms. Ayesha Zaheer, of Cellular Realty Advisors, here on behalf of VoiceStream, was sworn in and testified that
VoiceStream is a publicly traded company on the NASDAQ and is a leading provider of digital wireless
communication in the western states. She said they have installations in 23 of the top 25 metropolitan areas in the
country and they are the fourth largest provider of wireless communications in the U.S. Ms. Zaheer said VoiceStream
is here today to request a height variation to the Mount Prospect Zoning Code, specifically the 70' height restriction.
She pointed out that the River Trails Park District location is zoned Conservation/Recreation and that is the main
reason they looked into this parcel to locate their wireless facility. Monopoles are permitted in that district by the
Zoning Code. She explained that what they are actually requesting is a 110' monopole with a 10'antenna.
VoiceStreem wants to locate the monopole at the 4~ light standard in from the east of the south end of the driving
range in the large wooded area. They are seeking a total height variance of 50' (40' for the pole and a 10' antenna).
Ms. Zahcer addressed staffs comments opposing a variation: physical surroundings - the wooded area has trees that
may grow to 90' which would cause interference with the frequency waves if the pole were at the permitted 70' height.
Ms. Zaheer addressed staff comments regarding tree-trimming: Ms. Zahcer said if they were to attempt to do tree-
trimming or removal, it would cause an alteration of essential character 0f property which would be counter-productive
to the city standards of planting trees and encouraging plant growth. Ms. Zahcer called attention to a letter from River
Trails Park District forbidding them from trimming trees on the Park District land. Ms. Zaheer also said they are
allowing the Prospect Heights Fire Department to share the monopole. She explained that the Fire Department also
needs to clear 90' and needs 97' to do that; from that 97', VoiceStream will need a 10' separation. Ms. Zaheer
addressed staffs comments regarding public welfare and safety: Ms. Zahcer said the proposed monopole meets all
state and federal guidelines. She said their monopoles deflect no more than one degree and withstand 100 m.p.h.
winds. The wireless facility is completely enclosed by a 6' high chain link fence with an alarm inside, and a 20' ladder
would be required to climb the pole. Ms. Zaheer addressed the essential character of the property. She described the
property as having 12 or more lightpoles, a driving range, .a parking lot and numerous Park District amenities such as
tennis courts, ball parks, etc., which also have light poles about 65' high, thus there are already numerous vertical
elements on this property. Ms. Zaheer explained VoiceStream is especially sensitive to the character of the area and
attempted to align their monopole with the other light poles in order to remain unobtrusive. She pointed out that,
instead of being in front of the wooded area they will place the pole inside, tucked into the wooded area. The first 70'
of monopole won't be seen as it will be screened by the existing wooded area~ She also said the part of the facility that
will be seen by the driving range will be screened with 4'-6' evergreens and English Ivy on the fence. Ms. Zaheer
concluded by saying VoiceStream was here to provide service to our community through: (1) public safety, by
providing space on the monopole to the Fire Department; and (2) facilitating communications.
Ms. Juracek briefly outlined provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, noting that the guidelines in the act
address approval and denial of facilities ofthis type. She pointed out that the Village's Code follows federal guidelines
and states that any decision (made by the ZBA Or Village Board) cannot interfere or prohibit personal wireless services
to anyone or unreasonably discriminate against any company that provides personal wireless services.
Ms. Juracek addressed Ms: Zabeer and said her understanding of the technology is that each tower covers a radius of a
certain distance and VoiceStream wants, to locate these towers in such a way that the radii intersect, or else "dead
areas" occur. Ms. Juracek asked Ms; Zaheer if VoiceStream had considered taller buildings, such as a local church or
buildings in Kensington Park, to locate the monopole.
Ms. Zaheer responded by eXhibiting graphic propagation' maps assembled by their radio frequency engineers: She
explained that a good analogy would be a patchwork quilt which, if stretched or pulled too much, would fall apart.
VoiceStream's network would fall apart and provide no coverage at all or ,hole in coverage,' areas without proper
spacing of cell towers. She presented a map showing "coverage" without the proposed monopole. That map showed
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA~ 12-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3
much of the area with unreliable or no coverage, and no 91 I. Ms. Zaheer said the Park District site was the best
location for providing service to the area.
Leo Floros asked if VoiceStream had received any feedback from area residents. Ms. Zaheer said they had met with
the Fairway Estates Homeowners Association at their annual meeting and those residents were receptive to the project.
They provided the homeowners with the same handouts presented to the Board. The association does not oppose their
facility.
Ms. Juracek asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard.
Traci Jaeobson, 226 Fairway Drive, had some informational questions. She wanted to know what the Park District
was gaining from this project. Ms. Zaheer said they had a lease and would be paying a monthly rental to the Park
District. Ms. Jacebson also asked what effect this would have on their home theater or sound systems. Ms. Zaheer
said it would not have any effect on their systems, that they were required to stay within the frequencies licensed to
them. Ms. Juraeek informed Ms. Jacobson that another large cell tower exists at Golf and Busse and does not cause
problems for the residents in that area.
Keith Youngquist asked at what point the Prospect Heights Fire Department became involved. Ms. Zaheer said the
Park District had conversations with the Fire Department early in the process and it was a condition of their lease to
allow the Fire Department to co-lecate.
Elizabeth Luxem said she is not against VoiceStream's project but did express her frustration with government
agencies not working together, as well as the Park District's and Fire Department's insufficient and last minute
oommunieation regarding this project. She asked Jeff Perkins if the River Trails Park District had any communication
with him prior to the letter dated today regarding this project. Mr. Perkins responded that he had talked to Tom Pope
of the River Trails Park District regarding the variation process when the application was submitted, but not since then.
Ms. Luxem said she did not like the late date or the tone of the Fire Department and River Trails letter and felt the
Village was being held hostage in this matter. She said she finds the attitude of the Park District, and their
unwillingness to work with the Village, irritating. Mr. Rogers said, in defense of Tom Pope, he is always cooperative
with Village. He has worked with him and he does a great job in getting out to people and keeping them informed..
Ms. Suracek said we do have a philosophy to co-locate the monopoles as much as possible.
Mr. Rogers said he drove the area, and the light standards am virtually invisible to the public except for homes looking
down at the area, and he said he thought the monopole would not be very visible. Ms. Juracek agreed that the
monopole would not be very visible.
Leo Floros asked how wide the pole would be. Ms. Zaheer said it would be 40" in diameter at the base, which is never
seen, to 12-14" diameter at the top.
Mr. Floros said he was against the cell tower at Rand & Kensington near the Auto Mall being erected but now finds it
is unobtrusive.
Richard Rogers made a motion to grant approval for ZBA-12-2000, a request for a Variation to permit construction of
a 120-foot tall monopole personal wireless telecommunication facility at the Marvin Weiss Community Center,
seconded by Keith Youngquist.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYF_.S: Fioros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 5-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 12-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 4
Motion was approved 5-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 9:20 p.m., after hearing one more case, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn, seconded by Richard Rogers.
The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
~J~eff~erka~s, Planner
:" ' · ' i ,,MAY 8
,r ECEIVED
May 3, 2000
Mr. William J. Cooney, Jr.
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Propsect, IL 60056
Reference: Proposed Variation for a 120 ft Personal Wireless Communication Facility at
River Trails Park District at 1500 East Euclid Avenue, Mount Prospect
CI-I13-148C
Dear Mr. Cooney:
On April 27, 2000, VoiceStream came before the Zoning Board of Appeals to request a height
variation for the property referenced above. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted to recommend
approval to the Village Board of Trustees for the height variation request.
VoiceStream is scheduled to appear before the Village Board of Trustees on May 16, 2000.
If approved by the Board, the first reading of the Ordinance is scheduled for June 6, 2000 and the
second reading and final action by the Village Board is scheduled for June 20,2000.
We are writing to request a waiver from a second reading of the Ordinance, scheduled for
June 20, 2000, and to request final action by the Village Board at the first reading of the
Ordinance on June 6, 2000.
Thank you for your assistance with this request. We look forward to receiving a waiver from the
Village Board of Trustees.
Sincerely,
Ayesha A. Zaheer
Zoning Associate
Cellular Realty Advisors
For VoiceStream Wireless, Inc.
1375 EastWoodfield Road, Suite400 Schaurnburg, lL60173
VWL
522/00
5/31/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS1500EASTEUCLIDAVENUE
WHEREAS, Ayesha Zaheer, Agent for Cook InletNoicestream PCS L.L.C.
(hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Variation with respect
to property located at 1500 East Euclid Avenue (hereinafter referred to as the
"Subject Property") and legally described as follows:
That part of the SW¼ of the NE¼ of Section 26, Township 42, North, Range
11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying east of the W 940.6 feet thereof,
and lying north of the northerly line of Euclid Avenue as dedicated per
Document 12599682, all in Cook County Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation to construct a one-hundred and twenty
foot (120') tall monopole personal wireless telecommunication facility, which exceeds
the maximum size limit allowed in Section 14.311 of the Mount Prospect Village
Code; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a variation being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 12-00 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 27"~ day of April, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having
been published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 10~ day of Apdl, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same
meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation
would be in the best interest of the Village.
Page 2/2
1500 E. Euclid Avenue
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of
fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.6 of the
Village Code, to allow the construction of a one-hundred and twenty-foot (120') tall
monopole personal wireless telecommunication facility, as shown on the Site Plan,
a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGEDEvELOPIviENTMANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY
k-tit
DATE: MAY 12, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-11-2000- ll0S ROBERT DRIVE -CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL FOR
OF A FRONT PORCH 4' INTO A FRONT SETBACK
STANLEY WEGLARZ - APPLICANT
The Zoning Board of Appeals eousidered a request for a Variation to permit a 2~ story addition and porch to encroach
four feet into the required front sefoack at 1108 Robert Drive at their January 27, 2000 meeting. That request was denied
by the ZBA (which is final by Code) and the applicant then requested an appeal of the decision. The Village Board
denied an Appeal of that decision at their meeting of February 15, 2000.
The applicant revised his plans to limit the encroachment into the required front setback to a four foot unenclosed
front porch. That encroachment can be permitted by approval of a Conditional Use. The proposal is described in
more detail in the attached ZBA staffmemo.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed Conditional Use in terms of Zoning Code Conditional Use
Standards and voted 5-0 to approve the proposed Conditional Use to permit the front porch to encroach four feet into the
required front setback at 1108 Robert Drive, Case No. ZBA- 11-2000.
Willi y, , D or of Community Development
/yP
\\VI-~V02~DEPTxCOMDEV~G~NG~BA~ZBA 2000X.MEI Memos~BA-11-2000emo (Weglar~).dec
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNEI~//J-~/
DATE: APRIL 21, 2000
H~ARING DATE: APRIL 27, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-11-2000 - 1108 ROBERT DRIVE
CONDITIONAL USE TO PERMIT A FRONT PORCH ADDmON TO ENCROACH FOUR
FEET INTO A REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Stanley and Judith Weglarz
1108 Robert Drive
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owners ofthe Property
Parcel Number: 08-14-114-008
Lot Size: 10,010 square feet
Existing Zoning: R1 Single Family Residence
Eaisting I_and Use: Single Family Residence
Lot Coverage: 29% existing
32% proposed
45% maximum por R1 ~striet
Requested Action: Proposal for a Conditional Use to allow construction of a front porch addition to encroach four feet into
the required 30' front setback.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION
The s,ubject property is an existing single-story home located on a 65' X 154' (10,010 square feet) single-family lot on
a relidential street. The existing home has a front setback of 30.31'.
The petitioner appeared before the ZBA at its January meeting to request a Variation to allow a proposed second story
addition and front porch to encroach 4' into the R1 District 30 foot required front yard setback. The proposal required
a Variation became it included living area in the setback area, in addition to the front porch. The ZBA denied the
proposed Variation, but expressed general support for the proposed addition, if the applicant could return to the ZBA
with revised plans that would not require a front setback Variation. The applicant has submitted revised plans that
eliminate the encroachment of the second story addition into the front yard setback, but retain the front porch that
would encroach by 4 feet into the required front yard sethaek. The em'rent proposal requires approval of a Conditional
Use for the front porch encroachment.
ount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Mecling of April 27, 2000
ZBA-I 1-200 Page 2
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and
visited the site.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to:
n The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare;
The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
cl Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion
on Village streets; and
rn Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and
other Village Ordinances.
The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 10,010 square foot parcel developed with a single family
home. The applicant proposes a porch that extends into the front setback by 4 feet. The encroachment of the porch
into the front setback is listed as a Conditional Use in the R1 district and meets all other zoning requirements. The
proposal would have no negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed
Conditional Use will be in compliance will the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The
essential character of the neighborhood - a single-family residential area - would not be affected by the proposed
Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed porch addition enhances the existing home and the Conditional Use request meets the Conditional Use
standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that
the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed pomh
to encroach 4' into the required front setback for the residence at 1108 Robert Drive, Case No. ZBA-11-2000. The
Village Board's decision is final for this case.
I concur-:
/JP
HAGENXPLNGXZBAXZISA 2000XStaff Meannos'~lSA-I 1-2000 Memo (W~glarz2).doc
1.~' UTILITY EASEMENT
L O 'It' 8~
EXISTING
20.1~
EXISTING
NE~ ~
~ DECK ~
FL. ADDITION
PORCH
ROBERT DRIVE
SITE PLAN ,~
PLAT OF SURI/~
JAMES M., ELLMAN
LK1T B IN IiLDCK 4 IN ELK RlllGr VILLA UNIT 1, 1)£[N~ A ~UDDIVI~IC]N' IN THE
WET 1/~ {~ THE VE~T l/P- OF SECTInN 14, TOWN*~HIP 41 NDRTH, RANGE 11,
EAST nF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN nDnK CI]UNTY, ILLINKmI~,
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-11-2000 Hearing Date: April 27, 2000
PETITIONER: Stanley and Judith Weglarz
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1108 Robert Drive
PUBLICATION DATE: April 10, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Conditional Use to permit a front porch addition to encroach four feet into a
required front setback
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotton
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Stanley Weglarz
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the March 23, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000 were postponed to the May 25, 2000
meeting. At 7:55, after hearing another case, Ms. Juracek introduced Case ZBA-I 1-2000, a Conditional Use to permit
a front porch addition to encroach four feet into a required front setback.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices,
and through signage on the properVy. He indicated this request was for a Conditional Use to permit a front porch
addition to encroach four feet into a required front setback. He then reminded the ZBA that Mr. Weglarz had appeared
before them at their January meeting requesting a front sethack Variation for a second story addition and front porch.
He added that the ZBA had denied that request, based on a lack of hardship, but stated that they would support his
proposal if he would work with his architect to adjust the plans to meet Zoning Code Requirements. Mr. Perkins stated
that the proposed plans now met all applicable Zoning requirements and gave Staff's recommendation of approval of
the proposed Conditional Use.
Keith Youngquist inquired about the encroachment of the bay window on the second floor into the fi.om setback. Mr.
Perkins stated that the Zoning Code specifies that bay windows may encroach into required setbacks by up to 24". Mr.
Youngquiat asked whether the Zoning Code specifies a limit to the size of a "bay window." Mr. Perkins responded
that it does not. Mr. Rogers stated that the proposed bay window appeared to be a window seat and therefore
consistent with the intent of the Code provision in question.
Leo Fioros thanked the petitioner for working with Staff to arrive at an acceptable revised plan. Mr. Weglarz said he
and his family wanted to stay in Mount Prospect at his present address.
Richard Rogers made a motion to grant approval for Case ZBA-II-2000, a request for a Conditional Use to permit a
front porch addition to encroach four feet into a required front setback. Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA-11-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 5-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:45 p.m., after the Board reviewed two more cases, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn, seconded by
Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
~arbar~ §wiatek,~P~anning Secretary
/Jeffe/ry l~rkir~, Planner
COMMUNITY DEVELOPME~'~T DEFt
William J. Cooney, Jr.,
~llage of Mount Prospect RECEIVED
Communi~ Development DepaAment
100 S. Emerson St.
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056
s. ,o,e,
Dear William J. Cooney, Jr.,
I am asking for a ~iver of the second reading of the above ZBA case at the
June 6~, 2000 ~llage board meeting, After the Zoning Board approved the ~se
5-0 for the conditional use of the front porch, and also at the May 16,2000
~llage Board Meeting the Case ~s approved ~th a 6~ for the ~nditional use.
I ~uld like to move fo~rd ~th my addition, seeing that I have been working
on this sin~ Nov. of "99" ~em ~s no Zoning Board meeting in Dec. so I had
to ~it till Jan. 2000, I ~s denied by ~e Zoning Board and ~llage ~ard for the
encroachment into the front se~ack ~th the ~nd sto~ addition, so I had to
have my plans mdra~ and resubmit ~em back in March, and now here it is
almost ~e end of May and I would like to pro~ed with my addition ~ the front
porch along ~th ~e second sto~ addition.
Sincerely,
Stanley Weglarz
VWL
5/22/00
5/31/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1108 ROBERT DRIVE
WHEREAS, Stanley Weglarz (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for
a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 1108 Robert Drive, (hereinafter
referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
Lot 8 in Block 4, in Elk Ridge Villa Unit 1, being a sUbdivision in the W¼ of the W¼
of Section 14, Township 41, North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
in CookCounty Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use for the construction of a front porch,
encroaching four-feet (4') into the required thirty-foot (30') front yard setback; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 11-2000 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of
Mount Prospect on the 27~ day of April, 2000, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on the 10th day of April, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has Submitted its findings and recommendations
to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA
11-2000; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the
standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be
in the best interest of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Page 2/2
1108 Robert Drive
SECTION TVVO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
do hereby grant a Conditional Use, as provided for in Section 14.203.F.7 of the Village
Code, to allow the construction of a front porch encroaching four-feet (4') into the required
front yard setback, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and
hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A."
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a
certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVEDthis dayof ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:~G EN\flles~WlN~O RDINANC\C,USE,I 108 Rober[ Dr, Jun 2000,dOC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL SANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: MAY 12, 2000 \ ' '
SUBJECT: ZBA-14-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENTS TO MODIFY NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
TEXT AMENDMENTS.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - APPLICANT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Text Amendments to Sections 14.203.G.3
and 14.203.G.5, regarding notice requirements for Text Amendments to the Zoning Code. The Zoning Board of
Appeals heard the case at their April 27, 2000 meeting.
Members of the Village Board have recently questioned whether notices should be sent for proposed Text
Amendments, as they are not specifically exempted from the provisions of Section 14.203.G.3 and 14.203.G.5. While
maximizing public input on zoning matters is a laudable goal, providing the public notice required by Sections
14.203.G.3 and 14.203.G.5 is not practicable. The proposed Text Amendment insures that the Village will not have to
bear any extraordinary costs, while still requiring that Public Hearings for Text Amendments be noticed by newspaper
ad as prescribed by State Statutes. Thc proposed change is described in detail in the attached ZBA staff memo.
The ZBA briefly discussed the proposed Amendment in terms of the Zoning Code Standards for Text Amendments.
They stated that the signag¢ and mailed notice requirements seemed excessive and discussed several ways to ensure
that the general .public is well informed regarding proposed Text Amendments. The ZBA then voted 5-0 to
recommend approval of the proposed Amendment, Case No. ZBA-14-2000.
~'~hW~l: ~am j. Codne~ jr., AiCP
/IP
\\VH~V02~DEP'IACOIvlDEV~GEN~LNG~ZBA~ZBA 2000hMEJ Memos~ZBA-14-2000 (Notice)mcj.doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CItAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNE~
DATE: APRIL 21, 2000
HEARING DATE: APRIL 27, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-14-2000 - TEXT AMENDMENT TO CL.adilFY NOTICE
REQUIREMENTS FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS.
BACKGROUND INFoRMATIoN
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
REQUESTED ACTIONS:
Proposed changes to Zoning Code Section 14. 203.G.3 and 14.203.G.5
Modify Section 14. 203.G.3:
3. For all applications for Map Amendment, Conditional Use, Variation, or Appeal, :t:the applicant shall
provide to the Department of Community Development a list of all owners of record of property lying
within two hundred fifty feet (250'), exclusive of right-of-way width, of the parcel subject to the pubhc
hearing. The applicant shall attest in writing that the list of property owners is true and accurate. The
Director of Community Development shall cause a copy of the public notice to be mailed to all property
owners on the list no more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing.
5. For all applications for Map Amendment, Conditional Use, Variation, or Appeal, :l:the Director of
Community Development shall also cause one or more signs to be posted on the property which is the
subject of the public hearing.
ANALYSIS
The Community Development Department has sent mailed notices 0nly for Public Hearings that relate to a
specific subject property (i.e. Map Amendments, Variations, Conditional Uses, and Appeals). Members of the
Village Board have recently questioned whether notices should be sent for proposed Text Amendments, as they
are not specifically exempted from the provisions of Section 14.203.G.3 and 14.203.G.5. The proposed Text
Amendment would specifically list Map Amendments, Variations, Conditional Uses, and Appeals as items
requiring mailed notices and signs. Text Amendments would be noticed by a Newspaper ad, as required by
Zoning Code Section 14.203.G.3 and 65 ILCS 5/111-4-3. The proposed change would clarify any'confusion
created by the vague language.
While maximizing publio input on zoning matters is a laudable goal, providing the public'notice required by
Sections 14.203.G.3 and 14.203.(5.5 is not practicable. As an eXample, applying the requirements of 14,203.G.5
to a proposed text amendment to the RI zoning district would require placing individual signs on each of the
BA 14-2000 Text Amendments
Meeting of April 27, 2000
Page 2
thousands of R1 zoned properties in the Village and sending mailed notices to thousands more. The cost to the
Village, in terms of staff time, materials, and postage would be very high. This is a concern given that most
persons contacted by such a mass mailing would have little interest in the impacts of the proposed text
amendment. The proposed Text Amendment insures that the Village will not have to bear any extraordinary
costs, while still requiring that Public Hearings for Text Amendments be noticed in the manner prescribed by
State Statute.
STANDARDS FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS
Section 14.203.D.8.b lists standards for the Board to consider for text amendments to the Zoning Code. The
standards relate to:
the general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel;
consistency of the amendment with objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan;
the degree to which the amendment would create non-conformity;
the degree to which the amendment would make the Zoning Code more permissive; and
consistency of the amendment with Village policy as established by previous rulings.
The proposed amendment applies to all parcels in the Village and does not affect a particular parcel. The
amendment will not create any new non-conformity, as the proposed amendment affects notice requirements
and not development standards. The change will not make the code more permissive, nor would it impact
residential areas. Thus the proposed amendments are consistent with provisions of the Zoning Code and
Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Text
Amendments in Section 14.203.D.8.b. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the proposed Text
Amendment.
I concur,
William J. ICoo~ey, ~r., AICP
Director of Community Development
H:\GEN',PLNG~ZBA~ZBA 2000KStaff Memos~ZBA-14,2000(Text Amendment).doc
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-14-2000 Hearing Date: April 27, 2000
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
PUBLICATION DATE: April 10, 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Text Amendment to Zoning Code Sections 14.203.G.3 and 14.203.G.5
MEMBERS PRESENT: Leo Flores
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
IVIEMBERS ABSENT: Merrill Cotten
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES:
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting m order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the March 23, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Suracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000 were postponed to the May 25, 2000
meeting. At 8:40, af~er hearing three other cases, Ms. Juracek introduced Case ZBA-14-2000, a Text Amendment to
Zoning Code Sections 14.203.G.3 and 14.203.G.5.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper. He indicated this
request was for a Text Amendment to Zoning Code Section 14.203.G.3 and 14.203.G.5.
Mr. Perkins provided background on the proposed amendment. He stated that the Village Board had questioned
whether Text Amendments should be noticed with signs on "subject properties" and mailed notices to property owners
within 250' of those properties, as the text of Sections 14.203.G.3 and 14.203.G.5 appear to require. He stated Staff's
opinion that Text Amendments typically do not apply to a particular "subject property," as is the case in site specific
applications such as Variations, Conditional Uses and Map Amendments. He added that the application of sign and
mailed notice requirements to Text Amendments in the manner discussed would require the placement of thousands of
signs and mailing of an even greater number of notices, which would be a burden on available Staff time and very
expensive for the Village. He further stated that Illinois Statutes require only a newspaper legnl ad for notice of
proposed Text Amendments. He stated that the proposed Amendment would specifically identify the public hearings
that would require signs and mailed notices and eliminate any confusion regarding public notice.
Ms. Juracek asked how specifically the newspaper notices were worded, if the intention of the amendment was
"spelled out" or did they just read, "text amendment to Section xxx.xxx.' Mr. Perkins assured her that the ads identify
the Sections to be modified and a brief description of the proposed changes are included in the legal notice. Ms.
Juracek inquired if agendas for the Zoning and Village Board were aired on Mount Prospect Cable TV. In response to
her question, a telephone call from the control room informed Ms. Juracek that agendas were aired on the Mount
Prospect channel.
Ma. Luxem asked in which newspaper the legal notices appeared and was told the Daily Herald. Mr. Rogers
suggested that very detailed explanations of the requests be included in the notices, regardless of cost.
Richard Rogem made a motion to grant approval for a request for Case ZBA-14-2000, a Text Amendment to Zoning
Code Section 14203.(5.3 and 14.203.(}.5. Elizabeth Luxem seconded the motion.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 14-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers; and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 5-0. Village Board's decision is final in this ease.
At 8:45 p.m,, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was apprOved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Jeffery,,P6~rkin~s, Planner
5/23100
5/31/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING)
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Petitioner (Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect) have filed
an application for certain text amendments to Chapter 14 (Zoning) of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect to amend various regulations; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks amendments to the following Sections of the Village
Code:
Section 14.203.G.3 Administration and Enforcement
Section 14.203.G.5 Administration and Enforcement
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the proposed amendments, being the subject
of ZBA Case No. 14-2000, before the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 27, 2000,
pursuant to due and proper legal notice having been published in the Mount ProsDect
Daily Herald on the 10t" day of April, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given consideration
to the requests being the subject of ZBA 14-2000.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of
fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
~: Section 14.203.G.3 entitled "Administration and Enforcement" of
Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows:
"For all applications for Map Amendment, Conditional Use, Variation, or Appeal,
the applicant shall provide to the Department of Community Development a list of
all owners of record of property lying within two hundred fifty feet (250'), exclusive
of right-of-way width, of the parcel subject to the public headng. The applicant
shall attest in writing that the list of property owners is true and accurate. The
Director of Community Development shall cause a copy of the public notice to
mailed to all property owners on the list no more than thirty (30) days nor less than
fifteen (15) days pdor to the hearing,"
Page 2/2
Text Amendments
SECTION THREE Section 14.203.G.5 entitled "Administration and Enforcement" of
Chapter 14, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows:
"For all applications for Map Amendment, Conditional Use, Variation, or Appeal,
the Director of Community Development shall also cause one or more signs to be
posted on the property which is the subject of the public hearing."
SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Fadey
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER r'~. ]1~-~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE .~/~]{.~/~
DATE: MAY 10, 2000 ~/'~)
SUBJECT: PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL FINANCING
PURPOSE:
To present for the Village Board's consideration an ordinance authorizing the issuance of $2,165,000
of general obligation bonds for flood control improvements.
BACKGROUND:
On March 22, 2000, the Village Board authorized staffto proceed with the competitive sale of
$2,165,000 of tax-exempt general obligation bonds to provide funds for various flood control
improvement projects scheduled for 2000 and 2001.
DISCUSSION:
The attached memorandum dated March 15th describes the financing structure and the estimated debt
service payments. Repayment of the debt is expected to come from the Village's one-quarter percent
home-rule sales tax earmarked for flood control.
The accompanying bond ordinance is presented for first reading. The sections of the ordinance dealing
with interest rotes, principal and interest repayment schedules and the tax levy schedule have been left
blank since bids on the proposed financing will not be opened until 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday, June 6th'.
The complete bond ordinance will be presented to the Board for second reading and adoption at its
meeting the evening of June 6th.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board adopt the ordinance authorizing the sale of $2,165,000 of general
obligation bonds.
DOUGLAS R. ELLSWORTH, CPA
I:'~DebtX2000GOWIemo 5-10.doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: MARCH 15, 2000
· /
SUBJECT: PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL FINANCING
PURPOSE: To present a recommendation that the Village proceed with the issuance of $2,165,000
of tax-exempt general obligation bonds for purposes of funding various flood control projects.
BACKGROUND: The Year 2000 Budget includes flood control projects totaling $3,251,117. Some
of larger improvements included in the budget are:
(1) additional improvements to Weller Creek ($2,591,500)
(2) completion of the Maple/Berkshire improvements ($213,617)
(3) Wedgewood storm sewer improvements ($210,000)
(4) Addison Court improvements ($120,000)
Grant proceeds are expected to fund $1.2 million of project expenses. Also included in the 2000
Budget as a funding source is bond proceeds of $2,165,0000 from the sale of general obligation bonds.
DISCUSSION: Staff is recommending the issuance of $2,165,000 of tax-exempt general obligation
bonds to help fund certain flood control improvement projects in the year 2000. The bonds would be
retired using proceeds from the one-quarter home-rule sales tax established in 1991. This revenue
source is earmarked for flood control improvements.
It is anticipated that the bonds would be dated June I, 2000. Interest would be paid every June I and
December 1. Principal would be paid on December 1. The bonds would be totally retired on
December 1, 2008. At this time we expect the average coupon rate on the bonds to be 5.06%.
Attached as Exhibit I is the projected debt service schedule on the proposed financing. As you can
see, we would be paying only the interest on the bonds for the first five years. The first two years of
interest would be funded from a portion of the bond proceeds. We are not able to make principal
payments until the year 2005 due to the fact all of our one-quarter home rule sales tax revenue is
committed to other flood control financings until then.
' 03/15/00 09:29 FAX 18479985503 R.Y;,Norene Assoc ~.02
TABLE A E ~'~ I ~ I 'F- I
Hr, Pronpeot - $2,165,~0 G.O. ~ond;, Geriea 2000
~ond yr; 1G, 43?.Se -'
F~rnt tn~ere~: payment:
D£GT S£RVIC£ SC{~DULi~
PERZOD AIU~UAL
I;:RD[I~ PRZ~CZPAL RATE Z~T£REST TOTAL
2 12/~1/~1
3 12/011~2 e. eo 1~9~342,~ 1~9~342.5~
5 12/e~/~ e. ee ~eg~42.~e leg,342, se
6 ~2/el/e5 ~ee,~e.ee 4.~e ~e9,3~2.~ 289,342.5e
e [21el/~ ~4s~eee. ee 5, e~ st,e22, se 72&,O22. se
9 [2/a1/~ gsa, aaa. e; 5.1~e 48,4~.~ 9~,45e. ee
TOTAL
Daf-e g~uled Cap Zn~
I [21e1/~ ~,'67[ ~, 671
2 121~1/~1 1~342 1~,342
3 121~11~ 1~342 ~,691 54~671
4 12/~1/~ 1~9,342 ~ 1~9,342
5 12/~1/~ 1~42 e 1~9,342
6 12/el/~ 289~ a42 e 269,342
7 12121/~ 4~,522 · 49~,522
8 12/el/~ 7~ e22
· 9 121e1/~ 9~t45~
2, 9~, 378 218, ~4 2, 777~ 694
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF 92,165,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2000, OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Authority and Purpose. This ordinance is adopted pursuant to
Section 6 of Article VII of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 for the purpose of financing
flood control projects in the Village consisting of the Weller Creek Project, the
Wedgewood Project and the Melas Park Project. The foregoing improvements or
purposes are each authorized to be made or undertaken by the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois.
Section 2. Authorization and Terms of Bonds. The sum of 92,165,000 is
appropriated to meet part of the estimated cost of the improvements or purposes
described in Section 1 of this ordinance. Said appropriation is inclusive of the
amounts required to capitalize the interest due on December 1, 2000 on the bonds
herein authorized and to pay the costs of issuance of the bonds. For the purpose of
financing said appropriation, general obligation bonds of the Village are authorized to
be issued and sold in an aggregate principal amount of $2,165,000, and shall be
designated "General Obligation Bonds, Series 2000."
Bonds shall be issuable in the denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple
thereof and may bear such identifying numbers or letters as shall be useful to facilitate
the registration, transfer and exchange of bonds. Unless otherwise determined in the
order to authenticate the bonds, each bond delivered upon the original issuance of the
bonds shall be dated as of June 15, 2000. Each bond thereafter issued upon any
transfer, exchange or replacement of bonds shall be dated so that no gain or loss of
interest shall result from such transfer, exchange or replacement.
The bonds shall mature on December 1 in each year shown in the following
table in the respective principal amount set forth opposite each such year and the
bonds maturing in each such year shall bear interest at the respective rate per annum
set forth opposite such year:
Year Principal Amount Interest Rate
2005 8180,000 %
2006 390,000
2007 645,000
2008 950,000
Each bond shall bear interest from its date, computed on the basis of a 360 day
year consisting of twelve 30 day months and payable in lawful money of the United
States of America on December 1, 2000 and semiannually thereafter on each June
1 and December 1 at the rates per annum herein determined.
The principal of the bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United
States of America upon presentation and surrender thereof at the principal corporate
trust office of American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, in the City of
Chicago, Illinois, which is hereby appointed as bond registrar and paying agent for the
bonds. Interest on the bonds shall be payable on each interest payment date to the
registered owners of record thereof appearing on the registration books maintained
by the Village for such purpose at the principal corporate trust office of the bond
registrar, as of the close of business on the 15th day of the calendar month next
preceding the applicable interest payment date. Interest on the bonds shall be paid
by check or draft mailed to such registered owners at their addresses appearing on
the registration books or by wire transfer pursuant to an agreement by and between
the Village and the registered owner.
The bonds maturing on or after December 1, 2007 shall be subject to
redemption prior to maturity at the option of the Village and upon notice as herein
provided, in such principal amounts and from such maturities as the Village shall
determine and by lot within a single maturity, on December 1, 2006 and on any date
thereafter, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be
redeemed.
In the event of the redemption of less than all the bonds of like maturity, the
aggregate principal amount thereof to be redeemed shall be $5,000 or an integral
multiple thereof and the bond registrar shall assign to each bond of such maturity a
distinctive number for each 95,000 principal amount of such bond and shall select by
lot from the numbers so assigned as many numbers as, at 95,000 for each number,
shall equal the principal amount of such bonds to be redeemed. The bonds to be
redeemed shall be the bonds to which were assigned numbers so selected; provided
that only so much of the principal amount of each bond shall be redeemed as shall
equal $5,000 for each number assigned to it and so selected.
Notice of the redemption of bonds shall be mailed not less than 30 days nor
more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for such redemption to the registered
owners of bonds to be redeemed at their last addresses appearing on said registration
books. The bonds or portions thereof specified in said notice shall become due and
payable at the applicable redemption price on the redemption date therein designated,
and if, on the redemption date, moneys for payment of the redemption price of all the
bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, together with interest to the redemption
date, shall be available for such payment on said date, and if notice of redemption
shall have been mailed as aforesaid (and notwithstanding any defect therein or the
lack of actual receipt thereof by any registered owner) then from and after the
redemption date interest on such bonds or portions thereof shall cease to accrue and
become payable. If there shall be drawn for redemption less than all of a bond, the
Village shall execute and the bond registrar shall authenticate and deliver, upon the
surrender of such bond, without charge to the owner thereof, in exchange for the
unredeemed balance of the bond so surrendered, bonds of like maturity and of the
denomination of 85,000 or any integral multiple thereof.
The bond registrar shall not be required to transfer or exchange any bond after
notice of the redemption of all or a portion thereof has been mailed. The bond
registrar shall not be required to transfer or exchange any bond during a period of 15
-4-
days next preceding the mailing of a notice of redemption that could designate for
redemption all or a portion of such bond.
Section 3. Sale and Delivery. The bonds are sold to
as purchaser, at a price of $ and accrued interest from their date to
the date of delivery and payment therefor. The Official Statement prepared with
respect to the bonds is approved and "deemed final" as of its date for purposes of
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15(c)2-12 promulgated under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
The Village President, Village Clerk and other officials of the Village are
authorized and directed to do and perform, or cause to be done or performed for or
on behalf of the Village each and every thing necessary for the issuance of the bonds,
including the proper execution and delivery of the bonds and the Official Statement.
Section 4. Execution and Authentication. Each bond shall be executed in the
name of the Village by the manual or authorized facsimile signature of its Village
President and the corporate seal of the Village, or a facsimile thereof, shall be
thereunto affixed or otherwise reproduced thereon and attested by the manual or
authorized facsimile signature of its Village Clerk.
In case any officer whose signature, or a facsimile of whose signature, shall
appear on any bond shall cease to hold such office before the issuance of the bond,
such bond shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if
the person whose signature, or a facsimile thereof, appears on such bond had not
ceased to hold such office. Any bond may be signed, sealed or attested on behalf
of the Village by any person who, on the date of such act~ shall hold the proper
office, notwithstanding that at the date of such bond such person may not have held
such office. No recourse shall be had for the payment of any bonds against any
officer who executes the bonds.
Each bond shall bear thereon a certificate of authentication executed manually
by the bond registrar. No bond shall be entitled to any right or benefit under this
ordinance or shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose until such certificate of
authentication shall have been duly executed by the bond registrar.
Section 5. Transfer, Exchange and Registry. The bonds shall be negotiable,
subject to the provisions for registration of transfer contained herein. Each bond shall
be transferable only upon the registration books maintained by the Village for that
purpose at the principal corporate trust office of the bond registrar, by the registered
owner thereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender
thereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the bond registrar
and duly executed by the registered owner or his duly authorized attorney. Upon the
surrender for transfer of any such bond, the Village shall execute and the bond
registrar shall authenticate and deliver a new bond or bonds registered in the name
of the transferee, of the same aggregate principal amount, maturity and interest rate
as the surrendered bond. Bonds, upon surrender thereof at the principal corporate
trust office of the bond registrar, with a written instrument satisfactory to the bond
registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney duly authorized in
writing, may be exchanged for an equal aggregate principal amount of bonds of the
same maturity and interest rate and of the denominations of $5,000 or any integral
multiple thereof.
For every such exchange or registration of transfer of bonds, the Village or the
bond registrar may make a charge sufficient for the reimbursement of any tax, fee or
other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange or
transfer, which sum or sums shall be paid by the person requesting such exchange
or transfer as a condition precedent to the exercise of the privilege of making such
exchange or transfer. No other charge shall be made for the privilege of making such
transfer or exchange. The provisions of the Illinois Bond Replacement Act shall
govern the replacement of lost, destroyed or defaced bonds.
The Village and the bond registrar may deem and treat the person in whose
name any bond shall be registered upon the registration books as the absolute owner
of such bond, whether such bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving
payment of, or on account of, the principal of or interest thereon and for alt other
purposes whatsoever, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner
or upon his order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon
such bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid, and neither the Village nor the
bond registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary.
Section 6. General Obligations. The full faith and credit of the Village are
hereby irrevocably pledged to the punctual payment of the principal of and interest
on the bonds. The bonds shall be direct and general obligations of the Village, and
the Village shall be obligated to levy ad valorem taxes upon all the taxable property
in the Village for the payment of the bonds and the interest thereon, without limitation
as to rate or amount.
-7-
Section 7. Form of Bonds. The bonds shall be issued as fully registered bonds
and shall be in substantially the following form, the blanks to be appropriately
completed when the bonds are printed:
No.
United States of America
State of Illinois
County of Cook
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND,
SERIES 2000
INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE DATED DATE CUSIP
· % December 1, 20 June 15, 2000
REGISTERED OWNER: Cede & Co.
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT:
The VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, a municipal corporation and a home rule
unit of the State of Illinois situate in the County of Cook, acknowledges itself
indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner of this
bond, or registered assigns, the principal amount specified above on the maturity date
specified above, and to pay interest on such principal amount from the date hereof
at the interest rate per annum specified above, computed on the basis of a 360 day
year consisting of twelve 30 day months and payable in lawful money of the United
States of America on December 1, 2000 and semiannually thereafter on June 1 and
December 1 in each year until the principal amount shall have been paid, to the
registered owner of record hereof as of the 15th day of the calendar month next
-8-
preceding such interest payment date, by wire transfer pursuant to an agreement by
and between the Village and the registered owner, or otherwise by check or draft
mailed to the registered owner at the address of such owner appearing on the
registration books maintained by the Village for such purpose at the principal
corporate trust office of American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, in
the City of Chicago, Illinois, as bond registrar or its successor (the "Bond Registrar").
This bond, as to principal when due, will be payable in lawful money of the United
States of America upon presentation and surrender of this bond at the principal
corporate trust office of the Bond Registrar. The full faith and credit of the Village are
irrevocably pledged for the punctual payment of the principal of and interest on this
bond according to its terms.
This bond is one of a series of bonds issued in the aggregate principal amount
of $2,165,000, which are authorized and issued under and pursuant to Section 6 of
Article VII of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 and under and in accordance with an
ordinance adopted by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village on June 6,
2000 and entitled: "Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of $2,165,000 General
Obligation Bonds, Series 2000, of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois."
The bonds of such series maturing on or after December 1, 2007 are subject
to redemption prior to maturity at the option of the Village and upon notice as herein
provided, in such principal amounts and from such maturities as the Village shall
determine and by lot within a single maturity, on December 1, 2006 and on any date
thereafter, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof to be
redeemed.
-9-
Notice of the redemption of bonds will be mailed not less than 30 days nor
more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for such redemption to the registered
owners of bonds to be redeemed at their last addresses appearing on such registration
books. The bonds or portions thereof specified in said notice shall become due and
payable at the applicable redemption price on the redemption date therein designated,
and if, on the redemption date, moneys for payment of the redemption price of ail the
bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, together with interest to the redemption
date, shall be available for such payment on said date, and if notice of redemption
shall have been mailed as aforesaid (and notwithstanding any defect therein or the
lack of actual receipt thereof by any registered owner) then from and after the
redemption date interest on such bonds or portions thereof shall cease to accrue and
become payable.
This bond is transferable only upon such registration books by the registered
owner hereof in person, or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, upon surrender
hereof at the principal corporate trust office of the Bond Registrar together with a
written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar duly executed by the
registered owner or by his duly authorized attorney, and thereupon a new registered
bond or bonds, in the authorized denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple
thereof and of the same aggregate principal amount, maturity and interest rate as this
bond shall be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor, in like manner, this bond
may be exchanged for an equal aggregate principal amount of bonds of the same
maturity and interest rate and of any of such authorized denominations. The Village
or the Bond Registrar may make a charge sufficient for the reimbursement of any tax,
-10-
fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to the transfer or
exchange of this bond. No other charge shall be made for the privilege of making
such transfer or exchange. The Village and the Bond Registrar may treat and consider
the person in whose name this bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof for the
purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal and interest due
hereon and for all other purposes whatsoever.
This bond sha~l not be va~id or become obligatory for any purpose until the
certificate of authentication hereon shall have been duly executed by the Bond
Registrar.
It is hereby certified, recited and declared that all acts, conditions and things
required to be done, exist and be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this
bond in order to make it a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Village have been
done, exist and have been performed in regular and due time, form and manner as
required by law, and that the series of bonds of which this bond is one, together with
all other indebtedness of the Village, is within every debt or other limit prescribed by
law.
-11-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Village of Mount Prospect has caused this bond
to be executed in its name and on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signature of
its Village President, and its corporate seal, or a facsimile thereof, to be hereunto
affixed or otherwise reproduced hereon and attested by the manual or facsimile
signature of its Village Clerk.
Dated:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Village President
Attest:
Village Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This bond is one of the General
Obligation Bonds, Series 2000,
described in the within mentioned
Ordinance.
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND
TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO, as
Bond Registrar
By
Authorized Signer
-12-
ASSIGNMENT
For value received the undersigned sells, assigns and transfers unto
the within bond and hereby
irrevocably constitutes and appoints
attorney to transfer the said bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full
power of substitution in the premises.
Dated
Signature Guarantee:
-13-
Section 8. Levy and Extension of Taxes. For the purpose of providing the
money required to pay the interest on the bonds when and as the same falls due and
to pay and discharge the principal thereof as the same shall mature, there is hereby
levied upon all the taxable property in the Village, in each year while any of the bonds
shall be outstanding, a direct annual tax sufficient for that purpose in addition to all
other taxes, as follows:
Tax Levy Year A Tax Sufficient to Produce
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Interest or principal coming due at any time when there shall be insufficient
funds on hand to pay the same shall be paid promptly when due from current funds
on hand in advance of the collection of the taxes herein levied; and when said taxes
shall have been collected, reimbursement shall be made to the said funds in the
amounts thus advanced.
As soon as this ordinance becomes effective, a copy thereof certified by the.
Village Clerk, which certificate shall recite that this ordinance has been duly adopted,
shall be filed with the County Clerk of Cook County, Illinois, who is hereby directed
to ascertain the rate per cent required to produce the aggregate tax hereinbefore
provided to be levied in the years 2000 to 2007, inclusive, and to extend the same
for collection on the tax books in connection with other taxes levied in said years, in
-14-
and by the Village for general corporate purposes of the Village, and in said years
such annual tax shall be levied and collected in like manner as taxes for general
corporate purposes for said years are levied and collected and, when collected, such
taxes shall be used for the purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the
bonds herein authorized as the same become due and payable.
Section 9. Debt Service Fund. Moneys derived from taxes herein levied are
appropriated and set aside for the purpose of paying principal of and interest on the
bonds when and as the same come due. All of such moneys, and all other moneys
to be used for the payment of the principal of and interest on the bonds, shall be
deposited in the "2000 Debt Service Fund", which is hereby established as a special
fund of the Village and shall be administered as a bona fide debt service fund under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. All accrued interest received upon the issuance
of the bonds shall be deposited in the 2000 Debt Service Fund. Concurrently with
the issuance of the bonds, the Village shall deposit into the 2000 Debt Service Fund,
an amount of money that, together with the accrued interest, shall be sufficient to
provide for the payment of the interest on the bonds due on December 1, 2000.
Section 10. Bond Proceeds Fund. All of the proceeds of sale of the bonds
(exclusive of accrued interest) shall be deposited in the "2000 Bond Proceeds Fund",
which is hereby established as a special fund of the Village. Moneys in the 2000
Bond Proceeds Fund shall be used for the purposes specified in Section 1 of this
ordinance and for the payment of costs of issuance of the bonds, but may hereafter
be reappropriated and used for other purposes if such reappropriation is permitted
-15-
under Illinois law and will not adversely affect the exclusion from gross income for
federal income tax purposes of interest on the bonds.
Section 11. Investment Regulations. No investment shall be made of any
moneys in the 2000 Debt Service Fund or the 2000 Bond Proceeds Fund except in
accordance with the tax covenants set forth in Section 12 of this ordinance. All
income derived from such investments in respect of moneys or securities in any Fund
shall be credited in each case to the Fund in which such moneys or securities are
held.
Any moneys in any Fund that are subject to investment yield restrictions may
be invested in United States Treasury Securities, State and Local Government Series,
pursuant to the regulations of the United States Treasury Department, Bureau of
Public Debt, or in any tax-exempt bond that is not an "investment property" within
the meaning of Section 148(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Finance
Director and agents designated by him are hereby authorized to submit, on behalf of
the Village, subscriptions for such United States Treasury Securities and to request
redemption of such United States Treasury Securities.
Section 12. Tax Covenants. The Village shall not take, or omit to take, any
action lawful and within its power to take, which action or omission would cause
interest on any bond to become subject to federal income taxes in addition to federal
income taxes to which interest on such bond is subject on the date of original
issuance thereof.
The Village shall not permit any of the proceeds of the bonds, or any facilities
financed with such proceeds, to be used in any manner that would cause any bond
-16-
to constitute a "private activity bond" within the meaning of Section 141 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986.'
The Village shall not permit any of the proceeds of the bonds or other moneys
to be invested in any manner that would cause any bond to constitute an "arbitrage
bond" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or
a "hedge bond" within the meaning of Section 149(g) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986.
The Village shall comply with the provisions of Section 148(f) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 relating to the rebate of certain investment earnings at
periodic intervals to the United States of America.
Section 13. Bank Qualified Designation. The Village hereby designates the
bonds as "qualified tax-exempt obligations" as defined in Section 265(b)(3)(B) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The Village represents that the reasonably
anticipated amount of tax-exempt obligations that are required to be taken into
account for the purpose of Section 265(b)(3)(C) of the Code and will be issued by or
on behalf of the Village and all subordinate entities of the Village during 2000 does
not exceed $10,000,000. The Village covenants that it will not designate and issue
more than $10,000,000 aggregate principal amount of tax-exempt obligations in the
year in which the bonds are issued. For purposes of the two preceding sentences,
the term "tax-exempt obligations" includes "qualified 501 (c)(3) bonds" (as defined in
the Section 145 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) but does not include other
"private activity bonds" (as defined in Section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986).
-17-
Section 14. Continuing Disclosure. For the benefit of the beneficial owners of
the bonds, the Village covenants and agrees to provide an annual report containing
certain financial information and .operating data relating to the Village and to provide
notices of the occurrence of certain enumerated events, if material.
The annual report shall be filed with each Nationally Recognized Municipal
Securities Information Repository and with the Illinois state information depository,
if any, within 210 days after the close of the Village's fiscal year. The information
to be contained in the annual report shall consist of the annual audited financial
statement of the Village and such additional information as noted in the Official
Statement under the caption "Continuing Disclosure." Each annual audited financial
statement will conform to generally accepted accounting principles applicable to
governmental units and will be prepared in accordance with standards of the
Governmental Accounting Standards Board. If the audited financial statement is not
available, then an unaudited financial statement shall be included in the annual report
and the audited financial statement shall be filed within 30 days after it becomes
available.
The Village also covenants and agrees, for the benefit of the beneficial owners
of the bonds, to provide timely notice to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
and to the Illinois state information depository, if any, of any failure of the Village to
file any such annual report within the 210 day period and of the occurrence of any
of the following events with respect to the bonds, if material: (1) principal and
interest payment delinquencies; (2) non-payment related defaults; (3) unscheduled
draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (4) unscheduled draws
on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (5) substitution of credit or
liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (6) adverse tax opinions or events
affecting the tax-exempt status of the bonds; (7) modifications to rights of
bondholders; (8) bond calls; (9) defeasances; (10) release, substitution or sale of
property securing repayment of the bonds; and (11) rating changes.
It is found and determined that the Village has agreed to the undertakings
contained in this Section in order to assist participating underwriters of the bonds and
brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers in complying with Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) promulgated under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. The chief financial officer of the Village is authorized and directed to
do and perform, or cause to be done or performed, for or on behalf of the Village,
each and every thing necessary to accomplish the undertakings of the Village
contained in this Section for so long as Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) is applicable to the bonds
and the Village remains an "obligated person" under the Rule with respect to the
bonds.
The undertakings contained in this Section may be amended by the Village
upon a change in circumstances that arises from a change in legal requirements,
change in law, or change in the identity, nature or status of the obligated person, or
type of business conducted, provided that (a) the undertaking, as amended, would
have complied with the requirements of Rule 15(c)2-12(b)(5) at the time of the
primary offering, after taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the
Rule, as well as any change in circumstances and (b) in the opinion of nationally
-19-
recognized bond counsel selected by the Village, the amendment does not materially
impair the interests of the beneficial owners of the bonds.
Section 15. Bond Registrar. The Village covenants that it shall at all times
retain a bond registrar with respect to the bonds, that it will maintain at the
designated office of such bond registrar a place where bonds may be presented for
payment and registration of transfer or exchange and that it shall require that the
bond registrar maintain proper registration books and perform the other duties and
obligations imposed upon the bond registrar by this ordinance in a manner consistent
with the standards, customs and practices of the municipal securities business.
The bond registrar shall signify its acceptance of the duties and obligations
imposed upon it by this ordinance by executing the certificate of authentication on
any bond, and by such execution the bond registrar shall be deemed to have certified
to the Village that it has all requisite power to accept, and has accepted such duties
and obligations not only with respect to the bond so authenticated but with respect
to all the bonds. The bond registrar is the agent of the Village and shall not be liable
in connection with the performance of its duties except for its own negligence or
default. The bond registrar shall, however, be responsible for any representation in
its certificate of authentication on the bonds.
The Village may remove the bond registrar at any time. In case at any time the
bond registrar shall resign or shall be removed or shall become incapable of acting,
or shall be adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent, or if a receiver, liquidator or conservator
of the bond registrar, or of its property, shall be appointed, or if any public officer
shall take charge or control of the bond registrar or of its property or affairs, the
-20-
Village covenants and agrees that it will thereupon appoint a successor bond registrar.
The Village shall mail notice of any such appointment made by it to each registered
owner of bonds within twenty days after such appointment.
Section 16. Book-Entry System. In order to provide for the initial issuance of
the bonds in a form that provides for a system of book-entry only transfers, the
ownership of one fully registered bond for each maturity, in the aggregate principal
amount of such maturity, shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as a nominee
of The Depository Trust Company, as securities depository for the bonds. The
Finance Director is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the Village such
letters to, or agreements with, the securities depository as shall be necessary to
effectuate such book-entry system.
The Village may remove the securities depository at any time. In case at any
time the securities depository shall resign or shall be removed or shall become
incapable of acting, then the Village shall appoint a successor securities depository
to provide a system of book-entry only transfers for the bonds, by written notice to
the predecessor securities depository directing it to notify its participants (those
persons for whom the securities depository holds securities) of the appointment of a
successor securities depository.
The Village may terminate the system of book-entry only transfers for the
bonds at any time, by written notice to the securities depository directing it to notify
its participants of the availability of bond certificates. In such event, the Village shall
issue and the bond registrar shall authenticate, register and deliver to the beneficial
owners of the bonds, bond certificates in replacement of such beneficial owners'
-21-
beneficial interests in the bonds, all as shown in the records maintained by the
securities depository.
Section 17. Defeasance and Payment of Bonds. (A) If the Village shall pay
or cause to be paid to the registered owners of the bonds, the principa~ and interest
due or to become due thereon, at the times and in the manner stipulated therein and
in this ordinance, then the pledge of taxes, securities and funds hereby pledged and
the covenants, agreements and other obligations of the Village to the registered
owners and the beneficial owners of the bonds shall be discharged and satisfied.
(B) Any bonds or interest installments appertaining thereto, whether at or
prior to the maturity or the redemption date of such bonds, shall be deemed to have
been paid within the meaning of paragraph (A) of this Section if (1) in case any such
bonds are to be redeemed prior to the maturity thereof, there shall have been taken
all action necessary to call such bonds for redemption and notice of such redemption
shall have been duly given or provision shall have been made for the giving of such
notice, and (2) there shall have been deposited in trust with a bank, trust company
or national banking association acting as fiduciary for such purpose either (i) moneys
in an amount which shall be sufficient, or (ii) "Federal Obligations" as defined in
paragraph (C) of this Section, the principal of and the interest on which when due will
provide moneys which, together with any moneys on deposit with such fiduciary at
the same time for such purpose, shall be sufficient, to pay when due the principal of
and interest due and to become due on said bonds on and prior to the applicable
redemption date or maturity date thereof.
~22-
(C) As used in this Section, the term "Federal Obligations" means (i) non-
callable, direct obligations of the United States of America, (ii) non-callable and non-
prepayable, direct obligations of any agency of the United States of America, which
are unconditionally guaranteed by the United States of America as to full and timely
payment of principal and interest, (iii) non-callable, non-prepayable coupons or interest
installments from the securities described in clause (i) or clause (ii) of this paragraph,
which are stripped pursuant to programs of the Department of the Treasury of the
United States of America, or (iv) coupons or interest installments stripped from bonds
of the Resolution Funding Corporation.
Section 18. Ordinance to Constitute a Contract. The provisions of this
ordinance shall constitute a contract between the Village and the registered owners
of the bonds. Any pledge made in this ordinance and the provisions, covenants and
agreements herein set forth to be performed by or on behalf of the Village shall be for
the equal benefit, protection and security of the owners of any and all of the bonds.
All of the bonds, regardless of the time or times of their issuance, shall be of equal
rank without preference, priority or distinction of any of the bonds over any other
thereof except as expressly provided in or pursuant to this ordinance. This ordinance
shall constitute full authority for the issuance of the bonds and to the extent that the
provisions of this ordinance conflict with the provisions of any other ordinance or
resolution of the Village, the provisions of this ordinance shall control. If any section,
paragraph or provision of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable
for any reason, the invalidity or unenforoeability of such section, paragraph or
provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this ordinance.
-23-
Section 19. Publication. The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to publish this ordinance in pamphlet form and to file copies thereof for public
inspection in her office.
Section 20. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form.
Adopted this 6th day of June, 2000, by roll call vote as follows:
Ayes:
List
Names
Nays:
Approved: June 6, 2000
Village President
Published in pamphlet form: June 7, 2000
(SEAL)
Attest:
Village Clerk
-24-
CERTIFICATE
I, Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois,
hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance entitled: "Ordinance Authorizing the
Issuance of $2,165,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2000, of the Village of
Mount Prospect, Illinois," is a true copy of an original ordinance that was duly
adopted by the recorded affirmative votes of a majority of the members of the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village at a meeting thereof that was duly
called and held at 7:30 p.m. on June 6, 2000, in the Board Room at the Senior Center
Building, 50 South Emerson Street, and at which a quorum was present and acting
throughout, and that said copy has been compared by me with the original ordinance
signed by the Village President on June 6, 2000, and thereafter published in pamphlet
form on June 7, 2000 and recorded in the Ordinance Book of the Village and that it
is a correct transcript thereof and of the whole of said ordinance, and that said
ordinance has not been altered, amended, repealed or revoked, but is in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
the Village this day of June, 2000.
Village Clerk
(SEAL)
Doc #:CH02 (58516-O0022-2) 1121597v1;5/9/2000/'rime:15:01
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: MAY 12, 2000
SUBJECT: SALE OF WATER TO SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
NORTHEAST CORNER ELMHURST ROAD/EUCLID AVENUE
PROSPECT HEIGHTS
The Village has received a request to consider the sale of water to the Social Security
Administration building at the above location. The request results from ongoing
problems with the onsite well. Apparently, the quality of the well water renders it unfit
for human consumption.
The Municipal Code allows the Village to enter into Intergovernmental Agreements with
other agencies for the purpose of selling water. As you know, in the past we have
entered into such Agreements with the City of Prospect Heights and, most recently, the
Elk Grove Rural Fire Protection District.
The Agreement, as proposed, follows the form and format of the Agreement with Elk
Grove Rural Fire Protection District. Under the Agreement, the Social Security
Administration will be responsible for all costs associated with establishing the water
connection. Additionally, they will pay the going rate for out-of-Village users including a
surcharge based on Special Service Area #5 costs.
A preliminary polling of the Board indicated that a majodty of Trustees supported
entering into such an Agreement.
MICH~ONIS
MEJ/rcc
c: Public Works Director Glen Andler
Finance Director Doug Ellsworth
CONTRACT FOR SALE OF WATER BY THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO
DESIGNER DIRECT, INC. FOR THE SOLE
AND DIRECT BENEFIT OF THE
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR THE
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
This Contract made and entered into this day of ,2000,
by and between the Village of Mount Prospect ("the Village"), an Illinois municipal corporation,
the United States Social Security Administration ("the Administration") and Designer Direct, Inc.
of 1455 East Golf Road, Suite 200, Des Plaines, Illinois 60016 ("the Owner").
WlTNESSETIt:
WHEREAS, the Owner desires to purchase water from the Village for its building at the
North East comer of Euclid Avenue and Elmhurst Road, in the City of Prospect Heights, Illinois
("the facility") for the sole benefit of the Administration; and
WHEREAS, the Administration desires to guarantee the payment for such water and to
provide certain other assurances to the Village; and
WltEREAS, the Village is willing to furnish water for the sole benefit of the
Administration and expects to have available water for the initial seventeen (17) year period of
this Contract as well as the ten (10) year option period as set forth in Section 16, or until such
time as the Administration or other U.S. government agency is no longer the Lessee; and
WHEREAS, the Village, the Administration and the Owner desire to enter into an
agreement for the sale and purchase of water;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements
contained in this Contract, the Village agrees to furnish and sell water for the sole benefit of the
Administration, and the Administration agrees to receive and guarantee payment for the water
and agrees to provide certain assurances upon the following terms and conditions:
1. Quanti~ of Water. During the term of this Contract, the Village shall provide
and make available to the facility, for its use at a delivery point set forth in Paragraph 3, water in
the volume required by the Administration for the facility at the Northeast comer of Euclid
Avenue and Elmhurst Road.
In the event that it becomes necessary for the Village to limit its delivery of water to its
water customers, the facility shall be entitled to receive, during such a period of scarcity, its pro
rata share of water available as determined by the proportion which the volume of water used by
the Administration during the last preceding twelve (12) month period bears to the volume of
water used by the other customers of the Village for the same period.
In the event that it becomes necessary for the Village to limit the use of water by its water
customers, by imposing lawn and sprinkling restrictions or otherwise, the facility shall be subject
to these same restrictions. Restrictions may be imposed by water pressure zones at the discretion
of the Village.
2. Quality of Water. Water to be delivered to the facility shall be of the same
quality as that provided to customers within the corporate limits of the Village from the Village's
system. Water quality after it leaves the Village water main is the responsibility of the Owner.
So long as the Village meets its responsibility pursuant to this paragraph, neither the Owner nor
the Administration shall make any claims whatsoever against the Village for costs or damages
caused by any failure to meet EPA or other regulatory agency water quality or composition
standards.
3. Point of Delivery.. The point of delivery of water from the water supply of the
Village to the facility shall be the Village's water main along (as extended) adjacent to the facility
at a point and in a manner approved by the Village. Any easements required for the connection
must be secured by the Owner.
4. Cost of Improvements. The Owner shall be responsible for one hundred percent
(100%) of any costs associated with the construction and installation of any piping or structure
required to fulfill this Contract, including, but not limited to, ail engineering and legal fees of
either party.
5. Drawings and Permits. The working engineering drawings for any piping or
structure required to deliver water to the facility shall be submitted to the Village for review,
modification and approval. The Owner shall be responsible for obtaining such other
governmental approvals or permits as are necessary, including but not limited to the Illinois EPA.
6. Notification and Cost of Repair. The Owner shall orally notify the Village
immediately upon discovery of any break, defect or other malfunction in the improvements and
shall then give written notification of the break, defect or malfunction within twenty-four (24)
hours of discovery. In the event the Village shall detect such break, defect or malfunction, it
shall notify the Owner immediately upon discovery and then within 24 hours of such discovery
give the Owner a written follow-up notification. The Owner shall use its best efforts to repair
such breaks, defects or malfunctions within twelve (12) hours after initial notification of such
break, defect or malfunction and in any event shall make necessary repairs as promptly as is
practical.
2
If the Owner notifies the Village that it cannot make the repair within twelve hours or
fails to make the repairs within twelve hours; the Village shall have the right to cause the repairs
to be made at the sole expense of the Owner. The cost of any repair, including labor and
materials to any improvements required on account of the Contract shall be borne by the Owner,
whether performed by the Village, the Administration or the Owner.
7. Other Connections. No connection or extension to serve any property other than
for the facility at the Northeast comer of Euclid Avenue and Elmhurst Road shall be permitted.
8. Measuring Equipment. The Owner agrees to furnish, install and replace as may
be necessary, at its own expense, at the point of delivery to the facility, the necessary meter pits,
valves and meters. All such equipment shall be of a standard type approved by the Village and
capable of reading rate and quantity and with the capacity of accepting telemetering equipment to
permit remote reading for measuring the quantity of water delivered under this Contract. Meters
may be tested and calibrated annually by the Village at the expense of the Owner.
The Owner or the Admiuistmtion shall be notified, in writing, of such calibration so that
it may be done in the presence of a representative of the Owner or the Administration and so that
the parties may jointly observe any adjustments which are made to the meter or meters in case
any adjustments shall be necessary. Maintenance and testing shall be performed by a contractor
or representative from the Village and shall be paid for by the Owner.
The connection shall be equipped with a backflow preventer approved by the Village.
9. Meter Reading Recordation. For the purpose of this Contract, the original
record or readings of the meter or meters shall be in the meter journal or other record book of the
Village. Upon request by the Owner or the Administration, the Village shall furnish the Owner
or Administration with a copy of such records or permit the Owner or the Administration to have
access to them during reasonable business hours.
10. Unit of Measurement. The unit of measurement for determining compensation
for water delivered shall be that typically used by the Village and all measuring devices shall be
so calibrated.
11. Price and Terms. The Owner shall pay the Village the nonresidential water rate
as set forth in Section 22.504.2 or similar rate provision of the Mount Prospect Village Code as it
may from time to time be mended.
12. Billing. The Village shall bill the Owner monthly for all water furnished under
this Contract and payments shall be due and payable by the Owner to the Village within thirty
(30) days from the date of billing.
13. Commencement Liability for Payments. Liability for making payments as
above set forth shall commence on the date of the first tender of delivery of water to the facility.
14. Owner Assurances. The Owner guarantees the payment of all water bills
furnished to the facility within thirty (30) days of being notified by the Village of any
nonpayment according to the terms of this Contract. Further, the Owner acknowledges the
Village's absolute right to discontinuation of water service upon forty-five (45) days written
notice, if the Administration or other U.S. government agency is no longer the Lessee of the
facility. The Owner shall hold the Village harmless and indemnified against any claims made by
any party whatsoever against the Village, its agents, officers and employees for the
discontinuation of such service.
15. No Liabili .ty. The Village shall not be liable for damages for breach of contract
or otherwise for failure, suspension, diminution or other variation of service.
16. Term of Contract. This Contract shall continue in full force and effect for a
period of seventeen (17) years. The Owner shall have the option to extend this Contract for an
additional ten (10) year period. The Contract may be renewed for any additional term permitted
by law upon such terms and conditions and rate adjustments, if any, which may be then agreed by
and between the Owner and the Village.
17. Modification. This Contract may be amended only in writing and with the
consent of both the Village and the Owner.
18. Hold Harmless. The Owner, for itself, its officers, agents and employees agrees
to hold and save the Village, its officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all claims,
damages, suits, causes of action and the like which may arise by virtue of this Contract.
19. Notices. All notices of communication shall be in writing and shall be either
delivered to the Owner, the Village or the Administration or, if mailed, shall be sent by registered
mail, postage prepaid, to the office of the Clerk of the Village or the General Services
Administration, Contracting Officer for Lease No. GS-05B-16042, 230 South Dearborn Street,
Suite 3622, Chicago, Illinois 60604 and Designer Direct, Inc., Attn: President, 1455 East Golf
Road, Suite 200, Des Plaines, Illinois 60016.
20. Severability. In the event that any part, term or provision or paragraph of this
Contract shall be found to be illegal or in conflict with any law by any court of proper
jurisdiction, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions of this Contract shall not be
affected.
21. This contract is assignable only if the beneficiary of the use of the water service is
a govemmental agency.
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties acting under the authority granted by their
respective governing bodies have caused this Contract to be duly executed in several
counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, all as of the date and year first above
written.
Village of Mount Prospect,
an Illinois Municipal Corporation
By
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
United States Government
By
ATTEST:
Its
Designer Direct, Inc.
By
ATTEST:
Its
NOTIFICATION ADDRESSES
General Services Administration
Contracting Officer for Lease No. GS-05B-16042
230 South Dearborn Street
Suite 3622
Chicago, Illinois 60604
President
Designer Direct, Inc.
1455 E. Golf Road
Suite 200
Des Plaines, IL 600616
(847) 297-1121
Mr. Michael E. Janonis
Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
EMI-~5116/OO\C:~v~yFilesLMP\SaleofvVater.cnt.doe
6
V~NL/
5/10/00
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT
FOR THE SALE OF WATER BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have entered into
negotiations with the Social Secudty Administration, in an effort to implement a contract for the sale
of water by the Village of Mount Prospect to the Social Security Administration at its Prospect
Heights, Illinois facility, said Contract attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that a
contract for the sale of water will be of mutual benefit to both parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the Clerk is authorized to attest
his signature on the attached Contract for the sale of water by the Village of Mount Prospect to the
Social Secudty Administration at its Prospect Heights, Illinois facility, a copy of which is attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That if any part of the attached Contract is found to be void and of no effect, that
the remainder of the Contract shall remain effective on the terms as written.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 2000.
Gerald L. Fadey, Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Connnunity Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
'
DATE: MAY 3 t, 2000
HEARING DATE: JUNE6,2000
SUBJECT: ZBA- 18-2000 - 1610 ALGONQUIN ROAD
MAP AMENDMENT FROM R4 MULTIPLE F.4MILY RESIDENCE TO B3 COMMUNITY
BUSINESS AND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO PERMIT ESTABLISHMENT OF A
STAND-ALONE PARKING LOT.
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Case ZBA-18-2000, a request for a Map
Amendment fi.om R4 Multi-family Development to B3 Community business and a Conditional Use to permit the
establishment of a stand-alone parking lot.
The subject property was formerly developed with a multiple family residential development in the R4 zoning district.
United Air Lines is proposing a building addition to their corporate headquarters (in unincorporated Cook County),
which is adjacent to the subject property. The proposed addition will increase the parking needed to serve the office
complex and will also eliminate some existing parking on the property. The property is no longer a multi-family
development and is completely surrounded by commercial, industrial, and office uses. The proposed B3 zoning
district is appropriate for the location. The B3 district lists stand-alone parking lots as Conditional Uses. The
proposed facility is an appropriate use in the district.
The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the map amendment and a conditional use for
Case No. ZBA-18-2000 at 1610 Algonquin Road. The Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use.
William J. Coonely Jr., AICP
H:\GEN~PLNG%ZBA~BA 2000~M EI Meo~s~BA-07-2000 (CVS) n~j memo.doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNI~)
DATE: MAY 19, 2000
Is. EARING DATE: MAY 25, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-18-2000, REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL TO PERMIT
CONSTRUCTION OF A STAND-ALONE PARKING LOT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Petitioner: Eva Stevens for
United Air Lines
1600 Algonquin Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Property Owner
Property Owner: United Air Lines
1600 Algonquin Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Location: ! 610 Algonquin Road
Lot Size: 5.0 Acres
Existing Zoning: R4 Multiple Family Residence
Existing Land Use: Vacant.
Requested Action: Petitioner is seeking a Map Amendment from R4 Multiple Family Residence to B3
Community Business Conditional Use approval to permit establishment of a stand-alone
parking lot.
BACKGROUND
Proposal
The subject property consists of three parcels with a total area of five acres. The property was formerly developed
with a multiple family residential development in the R4 zoning district. United Air Lines is proposing a building
addition to their corporate headquarters, which is adjacent to the subject property. The corporate headquarters building
is located in uninoorporated Cook County and has been the subject of numerous annexation discussions with the
Village. The proposed addition will increase the parking needed to serve the office complex and will also eliminate
some existing parking on the property. The applicant proposes to construct a 519-space stan~t-alone parking lot to
allow for sufficient parking for the adjacent office use and associated landscape improvements.
(
ZBA 18-2000 United Air Lines - Rezonmg and Conditional Use
Meeting of May 25, 2000
Page 2
Review and Approval Process
The property's current zoning is R4 Multiple Family Residence. To accommodate the proposed use, the property must
be rezoned to a commercial zoning district and the applicant has requested B3 Community Business. A stand-alone
parking lot is listed as a Conditional Use in the B3 district. The applicant has requested a Map Amendment to B3 and a
Conditional Use.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Map Amendment and Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of
survey, site plan, and landscape plan and visited the site.
Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning
The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject parcels for medium-density residential uses, in keeping with
the former development of the site. However, the land use designations on the Comprehensive Plan Furore Land Use
Map are advisory in nature and may be adjusted to react to changing circumstances. As the property is no longer a
multi-family development and is completely surrounded by commercial, industrial, and office uses, the proposed B3
zoning district is appropriate for the location. The B3 district lists stand-alone parking lots as Conditional Uses. The
proposed facility is an appropriate use in the district.
ANALYSIS
Parking Lot Design
The proposed facility is a 519-space parking lot that would serve the adjacent office complex. The lot is designed with
24' wide driveways throughout and 18' X 8'6" perpendicular spaces. Zoning Code Section 14.2216 permits the 8'6"
wide spaces for office uses with use of parking spaces by principally long-term users. The lot is connected to existing
parking lots on the site by two 24' driveways that generally align with driveways in those existing lots. The design of
the parking lot meets the requirements of Article 23 Off Street Parking and Loading of the Zoning Code. The
proposed off-site parking facility is owned by United Air Lines and is within 500' of the property that it serves as
required by Zoning Code Section 14.2206.
No handicap spaces are shown in the proposed lot. According to Zoning Code Section 14.221 I, 11 handicap spaces
would be required. As the proposed lot is remote from the existing buildings, providing handicap spaces in the lot
would be inappropriate. However, the applicant must make provision for the 11 additional handicap spaces in existing
parking lots at locations with the shortest accessible rout to building entrances.
Engineering Division Review
The Engineering Division has reviewed the requested Conditional Use and has noted the following Development Code
requirements that apply to the subject property.
The site currently consists of three separate parcels and the proposed development will cross those
existing property lines. A Plat of Consolidation to create a single zoning lot will be required prior
to issuance of a building permit.
r~ The site currently has three curb cuts that serviced the former development on the parcels. As those
curb cuts will not be used for the proposed development, elimination of those curb cuts and
restoration of grass in those areas will be required. Illinois Department of Transportation ([DOT)
permitting will be required for this work.
Q Parkway trees are required at a spacing of 40' in the right-of-way adjacent to the site. The site has
547' of frontage on Algonquin Road, which will require 14 street trees for the property. Three
parkway trees are existing. Payment for an additional 11 trees will be required at the time of
building permit issuance.
ZBA 18-2000 United Air I..ines - Rezonmg aad CouditionaI Use
Meeting of May 25, 2000
Page 3
Streetlights will be required for the Algonquin Road right-of-way adjacent to the site. As the
Algonquin Road ROW is under IDOT jurisdiction, the property owner may enter into a covenant
agreeing to fund installation of lights adjacent to their property when IDOT installs lights in this
area.
The site was originally a multiple-family residential development. When United Airlines acquired
the properties, the multiple-family buildings were leveled. However, the infrastructure installed for
the development remains. The water main existing on the property is no longer needed, and must
be abandoned and capped at the mains in Dempster Street and Algonquin Road. The water main
should also then be extended in Algonquin Road along the property (approximately 250') to
complete the loop. Similarly, the existing sanitary sewer must be abandoned and plugged at the
property line.
[] The existing easements associated with the utilities to be abandoned must be vacated.
[] The plan shows access to the property from adjacent parcels instead of Algonquin Road.
Consequently, a cross-access agreement should be recorded.
Additional requirements may be identified following a review of engineering plans for the property. Fulfilling any
such Development Code requirements will be required prior to issuance of a building permit.
Landscaping
The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the proposed parking lot. The lot contains 144,500 square feet of
pavement area, requiring 7,225 square feet of interior landscape area. The lot contains 22 landscape islands with 7,36i
total square feet of landscape area. A i0' perimeter landscape buffer is required and is provided along the north, east,
and west property lines. Adjacent to Algonquin Road, along the west half of the property, a bermed perimeter buffer
with a minimum width of 30' is provided. Along the east half of the property's Algonquin Road frontage, the buffer
consists of a drainage retention area that is surrounded by additional plantings. Landscape materials in the form of
new evergreens, ornamental trees, shrubs, and sod are proposed in the perimeter buffer area. Ground covers and shade
trees are provided in all landscape islands interior to the parking lot.
REQUIRED FINDINGS
Map Amendment Standards
The standards for Map Amendments are listed in Section 14.203.D.8.a of the Village Zoning Ordinance. When a Map
Amendment is proposed, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in
each specific case with respect to, but not limited to, the following matters:
[] compatibility with existing uses and zoning classifications of property within the general area of the
property in question;
[] the compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning
classification;
r~ the suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing and proposed zoning
classifications;
c~ consistency with the trend of development in the general area of the property in question, and the
objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the vilIage
The subject property is located along a principal arterial road between an existing commercial use and the office
complex that the proposed parking lot would serve. Properf~es across Algonquin Road from the subject property are
developed with a mix of commercial and industrial uses. The proposed B3 zoning district and tl3e proposed use of the
site will be compatible with surrounding non-residential land uses and zoning districts. The proposed landscaping of
the subject property would significantly improve the appearance of one of the Village's major arterial roadways, as
required by Village Identity Objective 3 of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed zoning district and use of the
property can, therefore, be considered to be consistent with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan.
BA 18-2000 United Air Lines - Rezomng and Conditional Use
Meeting of May 25, 2000
Page 4
Conditional Use Standards
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section
contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to:
The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort
or general welfare;
The Conditional Use wilI not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the
vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties;
c~ Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize
congestion on Village s~reets; and
Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code,
and other Village Ordinances.
The proposed Conditional Use consists ora new, well-landscaped parking lot on a vacant property. The site is tocated
in a well established commercial and industrial area, containing a mix of commercial, industrial, and corporate office
land uses. The lot will be of an appropriate intensity for that commercial and industrial area. The proposed
development would have no negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed
Conditional Use will be in compliance will the Comprehensive Plan and with all Zoning Ordinance requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Map Amendments
in Section 14.203.D.8.a and Conditional Use Standards in Section 14.203.F.8. Therefore, Staffrecommends approval
of the proposed Map Amendment and Conditional Use with the following conditions:
1. Development of the site in general conformance with the submitted site plan prepared by Skidmore, Owings &
Merrill, dated March 30, 2000.
2. Development of the site in general conformance with the submitted landscape plan prepared by Wolff,
Clements and Associates, dated March 30, 2000.
3. Provide eleven (1 I) additional handicap accessible parking spaces in the closest accessible locations within the
existing parking lot on the office complex property or provide documentation that sufficient handicap spaces
exist in existing lots.
4. Submit final engineering plans for the site in general conformance with the submitted site plan prepared by
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, dated March 30, 2000 and meeting all requirements of the Development Code.
5. Provide Development Code required right-of-way improvements for the entire frontage of the three parcels.
I Concur,
Willifin~ (~oon~y,~Jr, AICP I ·
Director of Community Development
H:\GENWLNGXZBA~ZBA 2000kStaff Memos~ZBA- 18-2000(United).doc
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-18-2000 Hearing Date: May 25. 2000
PETITIONER: United Airlines. lnc~
1600 W. Algonquin Rd
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1610 W. A tgonquin Rd.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 8. 2000 DAILY HERALD
REQUEST: Map Amendment from R4 Multi-family Development to B3 Commumty
business and Conditional approval to permit the establishment of a stand-
alone parking lot
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Langdon Neal
Jerome Siegan
Michael Sutton
Ted Wolff
Steve Hubbard
Shaylyn Mills
Michael Kamich
Chuck Minor
Chairpemon Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed indefinitely. At 8:20, after hearing three other cases, Ms. Juracek
introduced Case ZBA-18-2000, a request for a Map Amendment from R4 Multi-family Development to B3
Community business, a Conditional Use, and Variations as may be required by the plan submitted, to permit the
establishment of a stand-alone parking lot.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper, mailed notices
sent to property owners within 250' of the subject property, and a sign placed on the property. He stated that the
subject property consists of three R4 zoned parcels with a total ama of five acres that formerly contained a multiple
family residential development. He informed the ZBA that United Air Lines is building an addition to their corporate
headquarters complex, which is adjacent to the property in unincorporated Cook County and has been the subject of
numerous annexation discussions with the Village. He added that the addition will increase the parking needed to
serve the complex and will also eliminate some existing parking spaces and that the applicant proposes to construct a
519-space stand-alone parking lot to allow for sufficient parking for the complex.
Mr. Perkins stated that to accommodate the proposed use, the property must be rezoned to B3 Community Business
and that a stand-alone parking lot is listed as a Conditional Use in the B3 district. He then described the property in
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-18-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
terms of the Village's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. He stated that the land use designations are advisory and
may be adjusted to react to changing circumstances and that, as the property is no longer a multi-family development
and is completely surrounded by commercial, industrial, and office uses, the proposed B3 zoning district is appropriate
for the location.
Mr. Perkins described the proposed facility and outlined how the design of the parking lot meets Zoning Code
requirements. He stated that no handicap spaces are shown in the proposed lot, but that the Zoning Code requires 11
handicap spaces. He added that the proposed lot is remote from buildings, so providing handicap spaces in the lot
would be inappropriate. He suggested that the applicant should provide for 11 additional handicap spaces in existing
lots at locations with the shortest accessible routes to entrances.
Mr. Perkins described the submitted landscape plan for th~ parking lot and stated that the proposed plan meets all
Zoning Code landscape requirements.
Mr. Perkins then discussed the proposal in terms of Zoning Code Standards for Map Amendments and Conditional
Uses. Based on positive findings regarding those standards, he gave Staff's recommendation of approval of the
proposed Map Amendment and Conditional Use with the conditions identified in the staff report.
Ms. Juracek confirmed with Mr. Perkins that thc Map Amendment does not go with the Conditional Use, that it is a
permanent Map Amendment regardless of the use of the property. Mr. Perkins said that was correct, the property
would be hereafter zoned B3.
Langdon Neal was sworn in and testified that United will be consolidating the three parcels, which total five acres of
currently vacant and undeveloped property within the United Airlines campus complex. The plan will allow for 519
parking spaces, associated landscaping, with lighting and striping in conformance with Village Code and all
specifications of the Village. This will allow United Airlines to increase their overall parking capacity in their world
headquarters and allow for additional expansion in the campus for the proposed office use, which is located in
unincorporated Cook County.
Ms. Juracek asked if Mr. Neal was amenable to staffs condition to provide eleven handicapped spaces. Mr. Neal
responded yes, United agreed with that and all other conditions recommended by staff.
Mr. Flores asked about United's expansion plans. He said he had read that United was moving corporate headquarters
to downtown Chicago. Mr. Neal said he would have Mr. Herb Gardner address that question.
Herb Gardner, Director of Public Affairs for United Airlines in the midwest, was sworn in and testified United is
erecting a new building at their existing 140,000 square foot office complex. It will be to the west of their north
building. It is their new Operations Control Center, which is the heart of the airline. It is an operation that is staffed
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks of the year. They are required to have staff in the dispatch center anytime an
airplane takes-off anywhere around the world. It is being built as a stand-alone facility and will eliminate some of
their existing parking spaces.
Mr. Flores asked about their plans to annex to Mount Prospect. Mr, Gardner said he could not address that question at
this time. They would be discussing those plans in the future.
Ms. Juracek stated she had toured the facility twenty years ago and it was very impressive at that time. She asked
about security and lighting of the facility.
Mr. Gardner said the entire complex is fenced and locked. The only entry is from the Linneman Road entrance. It is
well lighted and employees can request security assistance in getting to their cars.
Richard Rogers asked about trees that are in the parking areas. He said he thought several 4-12 inch honey locust and
hawthorne trees could be saved just by making some changes to the parking islands.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 18-2000
Arlene Juracek. Chairperson Page 3
Ted Wolff. Wolff and Clements, was sworn in and testified the trees which were slated for removaI cons~ sted of field
grown trees, not nursery stock, and more of a type inappropriate for parking lots. He said they are going to attempt to
save many of the trees but cannot guarantee their survival. While 37 trees will be removed. 136 new trees are being
proposed for a net gain of 99 trees.
Richard Rogers said he did applaud their efforts but thought that moving the islands to the east might preserve more
trees. Langdon Neal said they would take another look and do their best to preserve the trees.
Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval for Case ZBA~ 18-2000. a request for a Map Amendment from R4
Multi-family Development to B3 Community business, a Conditional Use. and Variations as may be required by the
plan submitted, to permit the establishment of a stand-alone parking lot. Richard Rogers seconded the motion
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:48 p.m., after hearing another case, Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers. The
motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swmtek, Planmng Secretary
Michael Blue
Community Development Deputy Director
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF COIVEMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
HEARING DATE: JUNE 6, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-2000 - 503 S. ~MAIN STREET
CONDITIONAL USE TO PERMIT A THREE-CAR GARAGE, ATTACHED
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use to permit construction of a three-
car attached garage at 503 S. Main Street. The subject property is an existing home on a 10,990 square foot lot on a
residential sweet. The petitioner proposes to demolish the existing house and construct a new two-story residence with
an attached three-car garage. Zoning Code Section 14. t003.A specifies that three-car garages are Conditional Uses in
the RA district, regardless of whether they are detached or attached. In order to accommodate his proposed garage, the
petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use. The property and the proposed house and garage would meet all Zoning Code
bulk regulations.
The lot on which the proposed house and garage would be located is 70' in width. Those measurements are consistent
with the requirements in the R1 Zoning District, in which a three-car, attached garage is a permitted use. The
requirement for Conditional Use approval for a three-car garage in RA is to prevent construction of very large garages
on the 50' wide parcels permitted in the district. As the subject parcel is 70' wide, the proposed garage would be
appropriate to the lot size and, therefore, would have limited impact on the adjacent neighborhood.
Based on their consideration of the facts, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 6-0 to recommend approval for a
Conditional Use for three-car attached garage for the residence at 503 S. Main Street, Case No. ZBA-19-2000. The
Village Board's decision is final for the Conditional Use.
/JC
H:\GEN~PLNG~BA~ZBA 2000~vlEJ Memo$~ZBA-19-20~0 (orm~ residence) mej memo.doc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PL~
DATE: MAY 19, 2000
ItEA. R~G DATE: MAY 25, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBAo19-2000 - 503 S. MAIN STREET
CONDITIONAL TO PERMIT A THREE-CAR, ATTACHED GARAGE
BACKGROUND I1VFORaMATION
Petitioner: Joseph $. Ortman
313 Bobby Lane
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Status of Petitioner: Owner of the Property
Parcel Number: 08-12-309-022
Lot Size: 10,990 square feet
Existing Zoning: RA Single Family Residence
Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence
Lot Coverage: 3 I% existing
40% proposed
50% maximum per RA district
Requested Action: Proposal for a Conditional Use to IX:xmit the construction of a three-car attached garage.
BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE VARIATION
The subject property is an existing home located on a 70' X 157' (10,990 square feet) single-family lot on a
residential street. The lot is currently developed with a residence and associated existing single-car, detached
garage and driveway.
The petitioner is seeking to demolish the existing house and construct a new two-story residence with an
attached three-car garage. Zoning Code Section 14.1003.A specifies that three-car garages are Conditional Uses
in the RA district, regardless of whether they are detached or attached. In order to accommodate his proposed
garage, the petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use. The property and the proposed house and garage would
meet all Zoning Code bulk regulations.
To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's pld~ of survey and site
plan and visited the site.
ount Prospect Zoning Board
Mcctmg or'May 25,
ZBA-19-20~) Page 2
Engineering Division Comments
The Engineering Division has reviewed the proposal and has noted the existence of two large street Wees in the
parkway adjacent to the subject propeW. The proposed driveway location and width may conflict with ~ose
existing trees. The Public Works Department would not support the removal or replacement of those ~ees.
Therefore, relocation of portion of the &iveway in the par~ay anWor reduction of its ~dth may be required
prior to issuance of a building pemit for the prope~.
~QUI~D FINDINGS
Standards for Conditional Uses
The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance.
section contains seven specific findings ~at must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. ~ese
standards relate to:
~e Conditional Use ~11 not have a de~imental effect on the public health, safeW, morals,
comfort or general welfme;
The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjo~ent, or value other properties in the
~ciniW or impede the orderly &velopment of &ose prope~ies;
~ Adequate pro.sion of utilities and ~ainage and desi~ of access and egess to minimize
congestion on Village s~eets; and
Compliance of the Conditional Use with the prohsions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code,
and other Village ~dinances.
~e proposed garage is a p~ of a new single-rarely residence ~at meets all setback, height, and lot coverage
requirements. ~e lot on which the proposed house ~d garage would be located is 70' in Mdth. ~ose
measurements are consistent ~th ~e requirements in the R1 Zoning Dis~ct, in which a t~ee-car, amched
garage is a pe~i2ed use. ~e requirement for Conditional Use approval for a ~ee~ar garage in ~ is to
prevent consmcfion ofveu large garages on the 50' wide parcels pemined in the disMct. As the subject p~cel
is 70' wide, the proposed g~age would be appropmte to ~e lot size and, therefore, would have limited impact
on the adjacent neighborhood. ~e garage ~11 have no impact on ufiliw pro.sion or public s~eeU. ~e
proposed Conditional Use would be in compliance ~11 ~e Co~rehmsive Plan and the Zoning ~din~ce
requirements.
~COMME~ATION
~e proposed Conditional Use would not have a negative effect on the public welfare or neighborhood c~ct~
and meets ~e findings required by ~e Conditional Use stand.ds in Section 14.203.F.8 of the ~ning
Ordinance. Based on these tintings, Staffreeo~ends that ~e ~A reco~end to the Village Bored approval
of the proposed Conditional Use to pemt a ~ee-car, a~ached garage for ~e new residence at 503 S. Main
S~eet, Case No. ZBA-19-2000, subject to approval of final plms by the Village Forester. ~e Village Board's
decision is final for this case.
I conch:
Will' mJ C~ney, CP, Director ofCo~iW Development
.. ~::~. _ _ __ __ ~__Oka Aven_~ue_. _ _ ~
~'* ~ Elmhurst Road
~ ~ P~e S~eet
~ ~ Ma~ S~eet ~ Route 83
Emerson S~eet
~ m ~ Maple S~eet
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE NO. ZBA-19-2000 Hearing Date: May 25. 2000
PETITIONER: Joseph Ortman
313 Bobby Lane
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 503 S. Main St.
PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 2000 DAILYHERALD
REQUEST: Conditional Use to permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-
car garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning District.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Merrill Cotten
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Richard Rogers
Keith Youngquist
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, Deputy Director of Community Development
Jeffery Perkins, Planner
INTERESTED PARTIES: Joseph Ortman
Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Minutes of the April 27, 2000 meeting were
approved. Ms. Juracek announced Cases ZBA-08-2000 and ZBA-13-2000, which were postponed to this meeting at
the April 27 meeting, would be postponed indefinitely. At 8:40, after hearing four other cases, Ms. Juracek introduced
Case ZBA-19-2000, a request for a Conditional Use to permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-car
garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning District.
Jeffery Perkins, Planner, introduced the case, stating that notice had been provided in the newspaper by mailed notice
and with a sign on the property. He indicated that the subject property has an existing home located on a 70' wide lot
on a residential street. He stated that the lot is developed with a residence, single-car detached garage and a driveway,
and that the petitioner proposes to demolish the house and construct a new two-story residence with an attached three-
car garage. He stated that the Zoning Code lists three-car garages as Conditional Uses in the RA district, whether they
are attached or detached. He added that the property and the proposed house and garage would meet all Zoning Code
bulk regulations.
Mr. Perkins stated that the lot for the proposed house and garage is 70' in width, which is consistent with the RI
Zoning district and that the R1 district lists three-car attached garages as permitted uses. He added that the Conditional
Use requirement for three-car garages in RA is to prevent construction of large garages on the 50' wide parcels
permitted in the district.
Following a brief discussion of the Zoning Code Standards for Conditional Uses and their application to the proposal,
he gave Staff's recommendation to approve the proposed Conditional Use, subject to the condition included in the staff
report. He informed the ZBA that the Village Board's decision is final for this case.
oning Board of Appeals ZBA- 19-2000
Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2
Richard Rogers verified with Mr. Perkins that, with a zoning of R-I, a 3-car garage would be allowed: Mr. Perkins
said yes, it would go right to the building permit process. He said the petitioner's site is in a neighborhood of 50' lots
and his property consists of 1 lot and 40% of the adjacent lot.
Joseph Ortman was sworn in and stated he has letters of approval from two neighbors and another neighbor is present
to speak on his behalf. He stated he is a widower with two boys and will soon be married to a woman with three
children. He has lived in his home 24 years and wants to stay in that neighborhood of Mount Prospect. With three
more children, one with a driving permit, he will need a larger garage and home.
Ms. Juracek said the size of the lot would accommodate the home and garage and the plans were beautiful and
appropriate for the neighborhood She stated except but for the zoning, there would be no problem in approving this
garage. She said Mr. Ortman's request was entirely appropriate.
Mr. Ortman stated that the parkway trees would not be impacted by the plans. He said he does want to keep the trees.
Mr. Perkins said it appeared that the driveway would fit between the existing trees. If there is a problem, the portion of
the driveway on the parkway could be narrower.
Leo Floros asked about Mr. Ortman's address on the petition - 313 Bobble Lane and asked if he didn't he live in the
Main Street house?
Mr. Ortman said he moved to that address temporarily to start building the new house.
Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for Case ZBA-19-2000, a request for a Conditional Use to
permit the construction of a new home with an attached 3-car garage in the RA Single-family Residential Zoning
District. Leo Floros seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotten, Floros, Luxem, Youngquist, Rogers, and Juracek
NAYS: None
Motion was approved 6-0. Village Board's decision is final in this case.
At 8:40 p.m., Elizabeth Luxem made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a
voice vote and the meeting was adjourned.
Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary
Michael Blue
Community Development Deputy Director
Mount Prospect Public WOrks Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
'FO: PLANNER JEFF PERKINS
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER CHUCK LINDELOF
DATE: MAY 18, 2000
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-2000; PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION
(503 SOUTH MAIN STREET)
We have completed our review of ZBA-19-2000, the requested Conditional Use to allow
a three-car garage, and have the following comments:
1. The preliminary plan shows the new garage being constructed across a property
line. We understand the property owner is in the process of resubdividing and
consolidating the two parcels (PC-2-2000) in an effort to eliminate this property
line. We have no objection to the proposed garage subject to the condition that
the Plat of Resubdivision is completed and recorded. Please note that the
Building Permit for the proposed garage cannot be issued until this Plat of
Resubdivision is recorded.
2. The plan does not show two (2) existing parkway trees near the proposed
ddveway location. Please note that the proposed driveway shall not be
permitted within 10' of the tree north of the driveway, or within 15' of the tree
south of the proposed driveway.
If you have any questions, please feel free to' call.
Chuck Lindelof
c. Forestry Superintendent Sandy Clark
X:\FILES\E NGINEE R\REV-EN G~ZBA~2.000\503S Main.doc
M0000071
VWL/
5/4/00
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING CLOSURE OF A PORTION OF
CENTRAL ROAD IN ORDER TO CONDUCT A PARADE
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect desires to hold the annual
Independence Day Parade on a portion of Central Road and Elmhurst Road
(Route 83) in the Village of Mount Prospect on Tuesday, July 4, 2000; and
WHEREAS, said parade will require closure of that portion of Central Road
between Northwest Highway and Busse Road, the curb lane of Westbound Central
Road between Busse Road and Arthur Street, and Elmhurst Road (Route 83)
between Northwest Highway and Golf Road; and
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois requires that the Village assume all responsibility
and liability involved in the closure of said State roadways.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect hereby requests the State of
Illinois, Highway Department, to close Central Road between Northwest Highway
and Busse Road, the westbound curb lane of Central Road between Busse Road
and Arthur Street, and Elmhurst Road (Route 83) between Northwest Highway and
Golf Road between the hours of 1:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. in order to conduct the
annual July 4th Parade, a copy of which parade route and requested roadway
closures is attached hereto.
SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect will assume full responsibility
for the direction, protection and regulation of traffic during the time the detour is in
effect and all liability for damages of any kind occasioned by the closure of the
aforementioned roadways.
SECTION THREE: That the Village of Mount Prospect will provide for efficient, all
weather detour signs, to be maintained, conspicuously marked and judiciously
patrolled by the Police Department for the benefit of traffic diverted as a result of
the street closure requested herein.
Page 2 of 2
Street closure
SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ., 2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\GEN\fi[es\WIN\RES\Close streets for parade,2000,doc
VWL
3/1/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY
IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
20 WEST BUSSE AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect has determined that it is in the best
interest of the Village to enter into an Agreement to purchase real estate located at 20 West Busse
Avenue, for municipal purposes, a copy of which Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect has determined that the purchase of
the subject property is attendant to the overall redevelopment efforts of the Central Business District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village President and Village Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Real
Estate Purchase Agreement for property commonly known as 20 West Busse Avenue, Mount Prospect,
Illinois, a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", the Board of Trustees having
determined that the Agreement is in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the Village President, Village Trustees, Village Clerk, Village Attorney, officers and
employees of the Village are hereby empowered to perform any act necessary to implement, carry out, or
give effect to the terms of the Agreement to purchase real estate, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Page 2/2
20 W. 13usse Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 1 of the BusseANille Resubdivision in that part of the West half of the Northwest % of Section 12,
Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois.
EXHIBIT "A" WILL BE DISTRIBUTED
AT THE VILLAGE BOARD MEETING, JUNE 6, 2000
vwl
5/3t/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A DETERMINATION OF
THE PREVAILING WAGERATES
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has enacted "An Act regulating wages of laborers, mechanics and
other works employed in any public works by the State, County, Village or any other public body
or any political subdivision or by an one under contract for public works," approved June 26, 1941,
as amended (820 ILCS 130/1); and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid Act requires that the Village of Mount Prospect of Cook County
investigate and ascertain the prevailing rate of wages as defined in said Act for laborers, mechanics
and other workers in the locality of said Village of Mount Prospect employed in performing public
works projects for said Village of Mount Prospect.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: To the extent as required by "An Act regulating wages of laborers, mechanics and
other workmen employed in any public works by the State, County, City or any public body or any
political subdivision or anyone under contract for public works," approved June 26, 1941, as
amended, the general prevailing rate of wages in this locality for laborers, mechanics and other
workmen engaged in the construction of public works coming under the jurisdiction of the Village
is hereby ascertained to be the same as the prevailing rate of wages for construction work in the
Cook County areas as determined by the Department of Labor of the State of Illinois as of
June 1, 2000, a copy of which wage rates are on file in the Office of the Village Clerk. The
definition of any terms appearing in this Ordinance which are also used in the aforesaid Act shall
be the same as in said Act.
SECTION TWO: Nothing herein contained shall be construed to apply said general prevailing rate
of wages as herein ascertain to any work or employment except public works construction of this
Village to the extent required by aforesaid act.
~[~.T~j~LT~j~: The Village Clerk shall publicly post or keep available for inspection by any
interested party in the main office of this Village this determination of such prevailing rate of wages.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk shall mail a copy of this determination to any employer, and
to any association of employees and to any person or association of employees who have filed,
or file their names and addresses, requesting copies of any determination stating the particular
rates and the particular class of workmen whose wages will be affect by such rates.
Page 2/2
Prevailing Wage - 2000
SECTION FIVE: The Village Clerk shall promptly file a certified copy of this determination with both
the Secretary of State and the Department of Labor of the State of Illinois and shall further cause
to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the Village, a copy of this determination
which shall constitute notice that the determination is effective and that this is the determination of
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval
and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ~ (;rt~ u$~
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER
DATE: MAY 31, 2000
SUBJECT: 2000 SHARED COST SIDEWALK
REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
Background
On May 9, at 10:00 A.M. sealed bids were received for the 2000 Shared Cost Sidewalk Program.
At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud. A bid notice was posted in a
local newspaper as required.
This project combines three programs: the Shared Cost Sidewalk Program is dependent upon
resident participation, and will replace sidewalk throughout the Village. The Sidewalk
Improvement Program (for the repair of uneven sidewalk squares) is targeted for the central
portion of the Village. The Sidewalk Construction program will install new sidewalk in the gaps
in the existing sidewalk at Camp McDonald Road and Burning Bush Lane, and along Camp
McDonald Road west of Mandel Lane.
Bids Results
Three contractors received Contract Bid Documents and all three contractors submitted bids.
The bids ranged from a Iow of $133,374.$0 by G. & M., Inc. to a high of $228,155.00 by
Schroeder & Schroeder, Inc. The Engineer's estimate for the project is $138,045.00. A copy of
the bid tab is attached.
All bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 5% of their total bids as required by the
Contract Documents. All bids were checked for their accuracy. One error was found in
Sehroeder & Schroeder, Inc.'s bid. The total cost for Item No. 8 (Bituminous Concrete Patch)
was not calculated correctly. The bid shows a total cost of $600.00, but this cost should be
$900.00 based upon the quantity and unit price. This increase in $300.00 of the total bid for
Schroeder & Schroeder, Inc. All bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. Below is a
summary of the bids.
Page 2
2000 Shared Cost Sidewalk Program
May 31, 2000
Bidders Total Bid
G. & M., Inc. $133,374.50
Globe Construction, Inc. $173,370.00
Schroeder and Schroeder, Inc. $146,901.75
Engineer's Estimate $138,045.00
Discussion
The low bidder, G. & M., Inc., is currently under contract with the Village working on the year's
Concrete Restoration Program, and their work has been acceptable.
This project combines funds available in three (3) accounts. The Shared Cost Sidewalk Program
traditionally includes work accomplished by the Village through this program as well as
reimbursement to residents for work accomplished by their own contractors. The budget for the
Shared Cost Sidewalk Program this year is $75,000.00. Also, residents have submitted
applications for $81,677.64. As of May 26, 2000, residents have submitted for reimbursements
totaling $3,174.50. Over the past two (2) years, residents have submitted for approximately
$20,000.00 of reimbursements per year. It is anticipated that the total expenditure from the
Shared Cost Sidewalk Account will be $102,000.00.
Resident participation has been greater this year than in past years, so insufficient funds are
available for this project. This shortfall may be reconciled in one of three ways:
1. Deny any further reimbursement requests and reduce the scope of the Shared Cost
Sidewalk Program by approximately 2,250 square feet. (This would require refunding
approximately 15 applicants.)
2. Reduce the scope of the Sidewalk Improvement Program. This program (for the repair of
uneven sidewalk squares) has a budget of $55,000.00, which will be applied to this
project. The scope of Sidewalk Improvement Program could be reduced from $55,000.00
to $28,000.00 to offset the additional cost of the Shared Cost Sidewalk Program.
3. Increase the budget of the Shared Cost Sidewalk Program by approximately $27,000.00.
age 3
2000 Shared Cost Sidewalk Program
May 31, 2000
Recommendation
The Contractor's bid was based on estimated quantities for the Shared Cost Sidewalk Program.
Because the actual quantities exceed the estimate, I recommend that the low bidder G. & M., Inc.
be awarded the contract for the 2000 Shared Cost Sidewalk Program in the amount not to exceed
$141,677.64 to cover the full amount of the three (3) programs.
If, however, it is desired to remain within the original budget, I recommend reducing the scope of
the Sidewalk Improvement Program and transferring $27,000.00 from that account to the Shared
Cost Sidewalk Program account. The budget for the Sidewalk Improvement would then be
$28,000.00, and the contract would be awarded in the amount of$114,677.64
Funding for this project is under the following Account Code Numbers:
0015104-690004; Shared Cost Sidewalk Program (currently $75,000.00)
0015104-690068; Sidewalk Improvement Program ($55,000.00)
0015104-690003; Sidewalk Construction ($5,000.00*)
*The total budget for Sidewalk Construction is $104,000.00, the remaining amount shall be used
to pay for the installation of sidewalk along Rand Road and Euclid Avenue which is scheduled
for bid opening on June 6, 2000.
Charles Linde'loft P.E.
I concur with the above recommendation.
Director often Andler'
Attachments: Bid Tabulation
X:',FILIES',ENG INEERkPKOJECTSkS IDEWALK~2000~hareCost~e¢ommendContractor.doe
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: MAY 31, 2000
SUBJ: PUBLIC WORKS UNIFORM RENTAL. AND CLEANING CONTRACT,
Background
At 10:00 AM on Tuesday, May 16, 2000, sealed bids were opened for the weekly rental
and cleaning of uniforms worn by Public Works Department maintenance personnel.
Bids requested were for a 36-month contract beginning in the summer of 2000. A legal
notice was placed in the Daily Herald and eight (8) invitational bids were distributed to
local vendors.
Bid Results
Two (2) bids were received. The results are listed below:
I No. Cost per Year
No. of No. of of Cost per (No. of 'ees X Cost
Descrirtion Emrloree~lil =~-'1~'-~l'~4'''chan~les "~"{'~lISetsWeek ier Week X 521
100% Cotton Shirts 34 5 11 $6.95 $12,287.76
& Pants
100% Cotton Shirts 6 4 10 $6.75 $2,106.00
& Pants
100% Cotton Indura 6 1 3 $2.25 $702.00
Flame Resistant
Shirts & Pants
100% Cotton Shirts 3 3 7 $3.80 $592.80
& Pants
Total Projected $15,688.56
Annual Cost:
100% Cotton Shirts 34 5 11 $5.15 $9,105.20
& Pants
100% Cotton Shirts 6 4 10 $4.12 $1,285.44
& Pants
100% Cotton Indura 6 I 3 $2.50 $780.00
Flame Resistant
Shirts & Pants
100% Cotton Shirts 3 3 7 $3.09 $482.04
& Pants
Total Projected $11,652.68
Annual Cost:
age2of2 · ..
May 31,2000
Public Works Uniform Rental and Cleaning Contract
Based on this tabulation, the lowest annual cost for this proposed contract is $11,652.68
as submitted by American Industrial of Chicago, Illinois. Staff has checked the
references provided by American Industrial and all gave satisfactory reports with regard
to their service and the quality of their garments. Furthermore, American Industrial,
operating under the name of the Steiner Corporation, rendered satisfactory service when
the held the Public Works Department uniform rental and cleaning contract from 1988 to
1991.
Bid Recommendation
I recommend that the Village Board accept the lowest qualified bid of $11,652.68 per
year for a 36-month uniform rental and cleaning contract as submitted by American
Industrial of Chicago, Illinois. Funds for this proposed contract are available in the
current budget in account 0015001-540571 ($6,990) on page 198 and account 6105501-
540571 ($6,990) on page 242.
Sean P. Dorsey
I concur.
'Glen ~. AndlC'r
Director of Public Works
SPD/spd
C:\Personnel\Uniforms\Bids~Award Recommendation.doc
Cc: Director of Public Works Glen R, Andler
Streets Foreman Frank DeLuca
Account Clerk Julie Bolin
File
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 'r~ crn t~
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS & BUILDINGS
DATE: MAY 31, 2000
SUBJECT: 2000 CRACK SEALING AWARD
BACKGROUND
As part of om' preventive maintenance program for our streets, we annually select streets for
crack sealing. We select streets that have been paved in the last 4-5 years. At 4-5 years after
paving, the pavement has transverse cracks that generally span the width of the street as well as
longitudinal cracks the length of the pavement. We seal these cracks to prevent further
deterioration of the street, thereby extending the life of the pavement. In order to contain the
costs of such services and material, we enter into a joint contract through the Northwest
Municipal Conference (NWMC) for this program.
BID RESULTS
Bids were received by the NWMC for the proposed 2000 Crack Sealing Contract and evaluated.
Last year, the Village paid $.99 per pound for crack sealing material installed. This year the
lowest responsible bidder was the same as last year, Behm Pavement, at $1.044 per pound, an
increase of $.054 per pound. Scodeller Construction was the actual low bidder at $.97 per pound,
however, the NWMC rejected his bid due to non-responsiveness to bid requirements.
NWMC fee of $.02 per lbs. will be assessed on each bill as in the past.
Two bids were received, and bid results are as follows:
Bidder Price per lb.
Scodeller Construction $ .97
Behm Construction $1.044
X:kFILES~FRONTOFF~BIDS\CRCKSLNG.2000.DOC 1
age two
2000 Crack Sealing Award
May 31, 2000
DISCUSSION
Behm Pavement had the NWMC Crack Sealing Contract in 1997 & 1999 and successfully
completed the project in good workmanship fashion.
The bids received were based on estimated quantities, which will be adjusted so that the total
expenditure does not exceed the budgeted amount. Funds for this proposed contract are in the
current budget on page 208, account code #0505104-540515 in the amount of $35,000 and on
page 212, account code 015108-540515 in the amount of $6,210. The total budget amount for
the 2000 program is $41,210.00.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend acceptance of the lowest bid as submitted by Behm Pavement for an amount not to
exceed $41,210.
Paul Bures
Streets and Buildings Superintendent
I concur:
" ~ -B~ .h~.Andler
D~rector of Public Works
pb
c: Director of Public Works Glen R. Andler
Deputy Director of Public Works Scan Dorsey
File
X:~FILES~FRONTOFF~B ID S\CRCKSLNG.2000.DOC 2
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
~¢ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
·
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: MAY 31, 2000
SUBJ: LUST INCIDENT AT 3 WEST CENTRAL ROAD
Background
Dudng the demolition of the building at subject property, a leaking underground storage
tank was discovered beneath the southwest comer of the foundation. The tank was
made of steel and had a capacity of approximately 1,000 gallons. Staff presumes that,
at some point in the building's history, the tank was used to store heating oil.
When discovered, the tank had several open holes and was filled with a combination of
petroleum product and groundwater. In addition, there was evidence that a substantial
amount of the soil surrounding the tank had been contaminated with petroleum product.
Pursuant to state law, a leaking underground storage tank incident was reported to the
Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
In order to remove the tank, it was necessary to apply for a permit from the Office of the
State Fire Marshal (OFSM). Staff also took the liberty of registering the tank with the
OSFM in order to make clean-up costs eligible for possible Leaking Underground
Storage Tank (LUST).Fund reimbursement.
On May 24, 2000, an OSFM tank removal permit was issued. On May 31, 2000 the tank
was removed under the supervision of an OSFM inspector.
Request for Proposal
In order to sufficiently clean the property for transfer to Norwood Builders, staff
presumes that it will be necessary to obtain a No Further Remediation (NFR) letter from
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. To this end, I have solicited K Plus
Environmental Consultants, Inc. of Chicago, Illinois, for a proposal to provide the
professional engineering and analytical laboratory services necessary to obtain an NFR
letter from IEPA. A copy of this proposal is attached for your review.
Discussion
K Plus' proposal assumes a volume of activity based on 1,200 square foot excavation.
At this point, the size of the hole that will be necessary to remove all contaminated soil is
merely a guess. If the hole is larger, more samples will be required and the cost will be
higher. If the hole is smaller, fewer samples will be necessary and the cost will be lower.
age 2 of 2
May 31,2000
LUST Incident at 3 West Central Road
K Plus' proposal includes all of the report generation and laboratory work necessary to
file a Corrective Action Completion Report (CACR) with IEPA. An approved CACR is
the document needed to obtain an NFR letter.
For the most part, the unit costs in K Plus' proposal match those they submitted as a
subcontractor in Albrecht Enterprises' building demolition bid. One exception is the unit
cost for CACR filing. In Albrecht's bid, they quoted a unit cost of $2,500. In the current
proposal, they request $3,500. However, the current proposal includes of the costs
associated with filing IEPA-required 20-Day and 45-Day reports. Our building demolition
specifications did not include the cost of filing these reports.
In addition, K Plus' proposal includes a number of other activities not identified in our
building demolition bid, These activities include sample collection, oversite and
documentation of the tank removal, and most importantly, supervision and
documentation of site remediation activities.
Recommendation
I recommend accepting K Plus proposal for $10,214 to provide professional engineering
and analytical laboratory services necessary to file a Corrective Action Completion
Report with IEPA. I also recommend that K Plus be authorized to exceed the proposal
amount on an appropriate unit cost basis in the event the excavation necessary to
remediate the site exceeds 1,200 square feet.
Sean P. Dorsey
Cc: Director of Publk; Works Glen R. Andler
,Ma~ 25 O0 08:~8a KPLUS COMSULTIMG 31222G$753 p,2
KO
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
921 W. Van Buren
Chicago, IL 60607
May 25 2000 Tel (312) 226-8700
Fax (312) 226-9753
Direct (312) 226-3072
E-Mail danc-~k-plus,com
VIA FACSIMILE
Mr. Scan Dorsey
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 W. Central Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056.2229
ILUST Closure: Proposal No: [i
3 West Central Avenue J104PROI !
Mount Prospect, Illinois ,
Dear Scan,
As we discussed tiffs morning, K-Plus Envirormzental is please to submit tiffs proposal to
complete the necessary collection and evaluation of data necessary to close the open LUST
incident at the above mentioned site location.
The scope of work for this project will include:
· analysis for contaminants for waste characterization including tests for petroleum
constituentsi BETX, PNAs;
· oversite and documentation of tank removal;
· oversite and documentation of clean-up activities;
· collection and analysis of closure sanaples; and
· generation of Corrective Action Completion Report to summarize and document the entire
closure and investigation process, including copies of all lab analysis;.
The cost for the investigation is $10,214 as explained in the table below. This estimate is based
on the premise that all work will be charged according to the unit rates shown. The fees outlined
herein include the cost of any travel and other direct job-related expenses which may be required
to complete the work.
JIO~PROI
~Ma~ ~5 O0 08:~8a KPLUS COMSULTIMG 31222S9753 p.3
Mr. Scan Dorsey
Proposal No. J104PRO1
May 25, 2000
Page 2
ftem Description [ Quantity I Units I Unit Price I Total Price
Laboratory Analysis
BETX analysis - standard service 141 EA ] 67.001 938.0G
DNA analysis - standard service 14 EA 157.001 2,198.0C,
Flash. point (flammability) analysis - standard service 11 EA I 34'001 34.012
?aint filter (tree liquid) analysis - standard service I EA I 15.00 15.012
I'CLP lead analysis - standard service l EA 84.00 84.012
Laboratory Analysis Total 3~269.00]
Project Documentation and Management
Field oversight & sample collection ~ DAY 865.001 2,595.0C
Prepare IEPA LUST Reports (20,.45, CACR) I LS 3,500.00[ 3,500.0C
?rqject management I LS ] 400.00 400.012
Senior project advisor 3 HR 50.00 450.0C
[Project Documentation and Management Total 6,945.011
l'otal Proposed Cost 10,214.00
Below is a list of temps relied upon in drafting this proposal:
· the project will be completed in its entirety and without interruption, not in phases;
· copies of prior reports and correspondence from the two LUST incidents will be provided;
· unlimited property access will be available in order to collect sarnples;
· no shoring of buildings, roads or walkways will be necessary;
· no more than 3 days ~.11 be required on-site to complete the work and collect the samples;
· the nmuber of clearance samples has been estimated based on an excavation assumed to be
approximately 1,200 square feet in size;
· K-Phis will contact the appropriate one-call system, JULIE, at least 72 hours prior to the
planned commencement of the field activities; and
· the owner will identify, all private utilities and buried structures within the property
boundaries prior to the initiation of all field activities.
The estimated time of completion is 4 to 5 weeks fi.om the date of receipt of authorization. To
signify your acceptance of this proposal, please sign and return the requested information below
or provide other appropriate written authorization.
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
a~ ~5 O0 08:~8a KPLUS COnSULTInG 3~22269753 p.~
Mr. Sema Dorsey
Proposal No. J 104PRO1
May 25, 2000
Page 3
Sincerely,
K-PLUS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Daniel M. Caplice, P.E.
Director of Technical Services
ACCEPTED BY:
SDiagt'e~'e
INTEROFFIOE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER, MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: WATER/SEWER SUPERINTENDENT
DATE: MAY 31, 2000
SUB J: DEEP WELL NUMBER 17 EVALUATION AND REPAIR.
BACKGROUND
In recent years, the Village has reconfirmed its commitment to use our five (5) deep wells as an
emergency, back-up water source. However, due to the fact that these wells are only exercised for an
hour or two every other month, we are concerned that the prolonged periods of inactivity and the
relatively short run times may adversely affect the longer term water production capacity of these
facilities. At the very least, there is concern that the test pumping information does not provide an
accurate assessment of the condition of these wells.
Four years ago we embarked on a course to assess the condition of our wells and gauge the capacity of
our emergency, back-up water system. As a result of this assessment we have instituted a program
whereby each well is pulled, evaluated, and, if necessary, repaired by professional deep well maintenance
technicians. In 1996 the deep well at Station No. 11 was rehabilitated. Three years ago, we targeted Deep
Well No. 4, and in 1998 and 1999 we rehabilitated Deep Well No. 5 and Deep Well No. 16 respectively.
This year is our final year of the program and we have planned to target Deep Well No. 17 for
rehabilitation. This facility is situated on Village property located at 1480 N. Elmhurst Road.
RFP RESULTS
On April 11tl~, a detailed technical Request for Proposals (RFP) was distributed to three (3) qualified firms
with extensive experience evaluating and repairing wells over 1,000 feet deep. The scope of work
defined in the RFP includes removing, inspecting, evaluating, and reinstalling Well Pump Number 17.
We have also required the installation of two (2) new 1/4 inch OD airlines if the existing airlines are
found to be defective 6r damaged. Finally, we have also solicited unit cost quotes to perform additional
work, such as replacing column pipe, televising of the well, repair of the pump motor, and other problems
that may be identified once the well pump is pulled and evaluated.
Proposals were accepted until 10:00 AM on April 28th, at which time they were opened and evaluated.
Two proposals were received. The results are as follows:
Task Description Layne Municipal
Remove, evaluate, and rek4stall Deep Well Pump No. 17 $24,500 $24,000
Install new 1/4" OD stainless steel airline $I,300 $ t,450
Install new I/2" OD 1,000 PSI plastic airline $250 $450
Replace 50 - 5' lengths of 3 1/2" oil tubing $6,800 $7,000
Replace 40 - 20' lengths of 10" column pipe $27,000 $23,400
Replace 40 - 10" column pipe couplings $3,720 $3,360
Televise well $1,600 $1,300
Sterilization of well $2,000 $1,250
Rebuild 480 VAC pump motor $11,000 $16,450
Totals: $78,170.00 $78,660.00
age 2...
Deep Well Number 17 Evaluation and Repair
May 31, 2000
These costs are based on estimated quantities of materials needed to make the necessary repairs. One
potentially significant item not included is the cost to repair the bowl assembly. I am unable to estimate
this cost at this time. However, the proposals do include an hourly labor rate for bowl assembly repair
charges.
DISCUSSION
The repair of these wells will insure a back up water supply sufficient enough to support the entire
community should we lose Lake Michigan water supplies from our parent supplier, the Northwest
Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency (JAWA). Based on test results from our most recently
rehabilitated wells, total well production from all five (5) deep wells should exceed 8.6 Million Gallons
per Day (MGD) when the program is complete.
RECOMMENDATION
It is my recommendation that Layne-Western be contracted to remove, evaluate, repair (if necessary), and
reinstall Deep Well 17 for a not-to-exceed fee of $78,170. Layne-Western has installed, repaired, and
evaluated many of our deep wells and were one of our primary deep well maintenance contractors when
we used ground water as our primary water soume. Their extensive experience and history of successful
projects with the Village of Mount Prospect make them a logical choice. I also request that the Village
Manager be authorized to approve any additional repairs needed, including bowl assembly repairs or
replacement and/or additional pipe replacement, up to the budgeted amount of $110,000. Funds are
available for this proposed project in the 2000 budget on Page 248 under account number 6105505-
540762 ($110,000).
Roderick O'Donovan
I concur:
Director of Publi~ Works, Glen R. Andler
C: Director of Public Works, Glen Andler
Deputy Director of Public Works, Scan Dorsey
File
\~PUBLICWORK\SYS2\USERSkRODONOVA\WORDk2OOOproj\WELL 17R3'Precomtnend.doc
MINUTES
COFFEE WITH COUNCIL
Saturday, May 13, 2000
09:00 a.m.
2nd Floor Conference Room, Village Hall
Meeting convened at 09:00 a.m. Those present: Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley, Trustees Timothy
Corcoran, Michaele Skowron, Dennis Prikkel, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl and Fire
Chief Michael Figolah.
Residents in Attendance:
Paul Snead 121 South Wa Pella
David Schein 700 West Ivanhoe
Sarah Corcoran 524 East Hill Street
John Babich 13 South Wa Pella
Ramon Rubio 412 North Elmhnrst Ave.
Paul Snead opened the discussion with a concern regarding the no left rum onto Wa Pella fi'om
Central Road. Mr. Snead specifically wanted to know if the cuxrent signage (no left turn) is
temporary or permanent. Mayor Farley explained that the current restriction is temporary to
assist with the Route 83-detour traffic, but the Board was considering making the intersection a
permanent no left mm. Mr. Snead explained that though he does not have strong feelings to
either option, he would like to encourage the Board to notify the neighborhood when this
discussion will come up so that the neighborhood would have the opportunity to provide input.
John Babich also joined in on the discussion regarding the no left turn signage from Central
Road onto Wa Pella. Another concern raised was speeding autos through the residential
neighborhoods. Mr. Babich asked about the use of photo radar equipment. The photo radar
equipment could be used to ticket drivers without requiring a police officer to be on location.
Trustee Comoran stated that while he supported the idea, there are concerns that the courts may
not support the tickets. The discussion then evolved into traffic calming measures. Chicago and
other cities have had reasonable success with placing large obstacles in the roadway intersection
that required motorists to slow down as they maneuver around the devices. This issue will be
discussed in the very near future at a COW meeting.
David Schein expressed kudos to the Village for their flood plain map work. Mr. Schein
recommended placing the map on the Village website.
Ray Rubio stopped in to have a cup of coffee and say hi.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael J. Figolah
Fire Chief
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South i mcrson Stl'CCt Mount Prospect. Illinois (>0056
NOTICI,}
TIiE MONDAY, JUNE 5, 2000 MEETING OF TIlE SIGN REVIEW BOARD IIAS BE'EN
CANCt','LLI£D. ANAGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO "IIfE: NI,XI .......... MEI,~IIN(,.
Da, wed tlais 2nd day of June, 2000.
Mt. Prospect Youth Commission
Agenda
June 7, 2000
Mount Prospect Public Safety Building
7:00
I. Call to Order
II. Roll Call
III. Approval of Minutes
IV. Announcements
A. Welcome to Guests
B. Next Meeting
C. Do-it YourselfSousa
D. Public Works Summer Jobs
E. Summer Adventure Camp
V. Planning Session
A. Review
VI. Committee Reports
A. Shirt Committee
B. Youth Forum Committee
C. Survey Committee
D. Publicity Committee
VII. Old Business
A. Youthview
B. Planting Flowers
C. Boxwood Bash
D. Club RecPlex
VIII. New Business
A. CROYA meeting
B. Youth Ordinances
C. 4th of July Parade
D. Elections
IX. Any Other Business
X. Adjournment
.MAYOR '-~[ffFffr[r~-/ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~w~ Michael E Janonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
Timothy J Corcoran Velma Lowe
Pau, Wm Hoefe. Village of Mount Prospect
Richard M. Lohrstorfer
D~=i~ ~. ~i~ Community Development Department Pro=: 847/392-6000
Michaele x~/. Sko~xon Fax: 847/392-6022
rrYana E. Wilks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Tr)~): 847/392-6064
AGENDA
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
2~d Floor Conference Room Wednesday
Village Hall June 7, 2000
100 South Emerson Street 7:30 p.m.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
I CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. April 5, 2000
IV. SUBDIVISIONS
None
V. OLD BUSINESS
None
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. PC-05-2000/Development at Rand & Kensington (2 E. Rand Road)
Exception to Sec. 16.405.F Detention Requirements.
B. Streetscape Stage II
Presentation by SDI Consultants & Land Design Collaborative, Inc.
Community Development Block Grant - Overview
VII. COMMENTS/OTHER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some
accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at
100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
April S, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman
Michael Zadel at 7:$0 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect,
Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call: Michael Zadel, Chairman
Gary Grouwinkel
William Reddy
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Antoinette Astreides
Frank Boege
Edwin Janus
Village Staff Present: Judy Connolly, AICP, Planner
Chuck Lindelof, P.E., Project Engineer
Others in Attendance: Jerry Brown, SRI
Helen Cohen, Archideas
James Kaplan, Kap-Sum Properties
Jeff Miller, Arehideas
Walter Graft, Gewalt Hamilton
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:.
Chairman Zadel opened the meeting and asked for comments on minutes from March 15, 2000. Carol
Tortorello said that the minutes should be amended to show that Jim Tinaglia, Ben Trapani, Ed Dowling,
and Mark Lattner were the only "Others in Attendance" and that it was incorrect to use the numeral "1" for
the name of Bank One. Chairman Zadel agreed and asked if there were additional comments. As there
were none, Carol Tortorello moved to approve the minutes as amended and Bill Reddy seconded the
motion. The motioned carried 4-0 with Matt Sledz abstaining.
SUBDMSIONS:
NONE
OLD BUSINESS:
NONE
NEW BUSINESS:
PC-08-99/Development Code Exception/I W. Rand Road (Rand and Kensington Roads)
Chairman Zadel introduced the first item of business and asked Judy Connolly to review the case.
Ms. Connolly said that the property owner proposes to rsz~ the existing LaSalle Bank.to construct
a retail development at I W. Rand Road. The petitioner is requesting relief from the
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of April 5, 2000 Meeting Page 2
Development Code to locate the detention facility closer than the minimum distance required by
code.
Ms. Connolly said the intent of the code requirement was to avoid foundation saturation, which
may lead to structural defects, and to create a safer development by keeping dramatic grade
changes and standing water away from building users: She said that the Development Code was
changed in 1996, previously requiring a 75-foot setback from the building and now allowed a 25-
foot setback. She said that this change reflected the Village's ability to be flexible to developers'
needs without compromising safety concerns.
Ms. Connolly said that the Petitioners property fronts onto two IDOT roads and that IDOT
requires detention facilities to be located ten feet, plus 1.5 times the depth of the detention basin,
from an IDOT right-of-way. Ms~ Connolly said that to meet this standard, the petitioner proposes
to locate the detention area behind the building, directly adjacent to the structure. She said that
the petitioner is seeking relief from Village requirements because the property is located between
two IDOT roads that have the potential to be widened. Locating the detention facility according
to Village requirements, in close proximity to the IDOT right-of-way could create an unsafe
situation if either of the roads is widened,
She said that the property at 1 W. Rand Road is difficult to develop because the adjacent angled
roads create an unusual shaped lot, the site slopes slightly downward along the southwest
property line, and the receiving sewer has a shallow depth. These factors limit the location of the
detention facility, its depth, and size because the new detention facility has to be consistent with
the existing site conditions and compatible with the existing sewer infrastructure. MS. Connolly
said that Village staff met with the petitioner, the architect, and the engineer for the project and
reviewed several different storm water detention facility designs. She said that the Village's
Engineering Division reviewed the petitioner's request and found that there was an alternative
way to design the site that meets IDOT and Village codes without requiring an exception to the
Village's Development Code requirements.
Ms. Connolly explained that the petitioner stated that the design that meets Development Code
regulations is impractical to maintain and requires installing over 500 feet of three-foot by nine-
foot concrete box sections. The low height of the concrete boxes could reduce the effectiveness
Of the s~wer system if sediment and debris enter the storage plpes~
She said that the Development Code requires that the petitioner show that there are no alternate
feasible means of fulfilling the Development Code regulations and that approving the exception
will not impact the health, safety, and welfare of the community. She said that the petitioner
explored alternative designs with Village staff. Ms. Connolly sgid that the proposed design that
requires an exception to the Development Code can be implemented in a manner that is in
keeping with the intent of Development Code regulations.
Ms. Connolly said that the Engineering Division and the Building Commissioner reviewed the
petitioner's design and found that it meets the intent of the Development Code requirements and
does not pose a safety hazard to the neighborhood or the building. She said that additional
hydrostatic pressure calculations are required for a building permit and will be provided before
the Village can issue a building permit.
Ms. Connolly said that the Development Code exception request provides an opportunity to
create an enhancement to this property. She said it is feasible, although not a condition of
approval, for the Village to request that the petitioner's landscape plan be dhsigned and
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of April 5. 2000 Meeting Page 3
implemented in a manner that is consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines and
exceeds the minimum amount of landscaping required by Village code.
She said that the petitioner's request for an exception to locate a detention facility closer than the
minimum distance required by Village code meets the standards for an exception because the
proposed design is feasible and fulfills the purpose of the regulations. The proposed storm water
detention facility will be designed in a manner that does not impact the structural integrity of the
building and includes safety provisions, such as a fence and "escape" ramps. Therefore, staff
recommends approval of the petitioners request to locate the detention facility closer than 25 feet
from the structure, for the property located at 1 W. Rand Road, Case No. PC-08-99 and that the
petitioner's landscape plan is designed in a manner that is consistent with the Village's proposed
Corridor Design Guidelines.
Ms. Connolly said that the petitioner, his architect, engineer, and structural engineer were
available to answer any questions about the project. Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner
questions about the design of the existing sewers, sewer capacity, and the impact of having a
three-foot tall ,concrete box under the parking lot. Jeff Miller said that they examined an
underground storage design but that the existing inlet that they have to hook into is extremely
shallow. This requires using a wide boxto accommodate the storage. The size of the box makes
the underground storage design difficult to maintain and requires that a person physically emer
the box to clean it out because the box cannot be "flushed out" and sediment would remain on the
bottom. There was detailed discussion about the underground storage design, the size of existing
pipes, sewer flow and capacity, and why the petitioner felt that underground storage was not
appropriate for this site.
There was discussion about the design of the proposed detention basin. Mr. Miller clarified that
the building is a slab on grade and would not have a basement or a crawl space. He said that
earth on the backside of the retaining wall is supporting the hydraulic pressure of the detention
wall. The hydranlie pressure of the water in the pond is opposed by the soil pressure and that the
detention basin walls below grade is solid concrete. Walter Graft and Jerry Brown explained in
detail flue design of the walls of the detention basin and the proposed materials. Mr Graft said
that the walls that are visible would be made of a landscape retaining wall material, using
keystone bloaks that are either 12" or 24" deep, depending on the geo-grid design.
The Plan Commission asked questions about storm water overflow, the traffic flow of the
development, and the landscaping requirements. The Plan Commission asked for examples
where the petitioner used the keystone design. Mr. Graft said that they used this design at
Lutheran General Hospital in a retention system and at Barrington High Sebool for an 1 l-foot tall
keystone wall, connecting two levels. He said that they put a fence and guard rail there for safety
reasons. Mr. Miller said that the Container Store in Oak Brook used a two tier keystone wall.
There was discussion about the track record of the keystone material and design and that it was a
proven system, structurally and esthctically. There was discussion about the safety of the
proposed design and that the fence should be vertical to discourage people fi.om climbing the
fence and to make it more difficult to access the site unless entered through the gate. Plan
Commission agreed that the petitioner took reasonable precaution in designing the detention
basin.
Chairman Zadel said that it was Plan Commission's responsibility to ensure that codes are met.
He said that in this case the Plan Commission has evidence that this code requirement could be
met by a different design, but that design posed a hardship. He explained that the hardship may
not meet the strictest Development Cede definition, but that the elevations of the property posed
OUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of April 5, 2000 Meeting Page 4
significant difficulty in implementing an underground storage detention design. There was
discussion that this property was unique because it fronted onto two IDOT regulated roads, Was
triangular shaped, and included atypical existing drainage features and elevations. There was
discussion about the impacts of setting a precedent by granting this request. The Plan
Commission noted that the need for exceptions to redevelop specific properties should be
reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
Gary Grouwinkel moved to approve the Development Code exception because of the unique
characteristics of the property (elevations, shallow inlet, IDOT regulations), that the proposed
design met the intent of the Development Code regulation, and that the site would be landscaped
in a manner consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines. Carol Tortorello seconded
the motion, which was approved 4-1. Bill Reddy asked that the minutes reflect that he voted
against the Development Code exception because he supported the underground detention design.
Plan Commission Training Workshop
Chairman Zadel presented the next item of business, an APA facilitated the workshop that he and
Carol Tortorello attended April 1, 2000. He said that representatives from NIPC presented
information on storm water management design. He said that the discussion focused on the
impacts of drainage and was presented for an audience of citizen planners. Chairman Zadel said
another part of the workshop focused on law and ethics, specifically the Open Meetings Act. A
hand out was distributed to the Plan Commission members to review at their convenience. There
was discussion on new ethics legislation. Chairman Zadel and Ms. Tortorello summarized the
workshop information materials on detention Ponds, the impacts of using different plant materials
in and around the ponds, and how to discourage geese from congregating around the pond.
COMMENTS AND OTHER BUSINESS:
There was general diseuasion on the Corridor Design Guidelines presentation at the March 28
Committee of the Whole meeting. Plan Commission discussed the materials presented to Village
Board and how the design was revised for ~e COW meeting. They reviewed the items that
Village Board and Plan Commission agreed on and discussed the next steps for the project.
There was discussion on tear-downs and the effects of large-scale second story additions on the
neighborhood. Plan Commission asked for information on the potential of creating a section of
the Development Code that addresses how' new residences or additions should be designed to
minimize the impact on the neighborhood. There was discussion about creating an Architectural
Review Board or having Plan Commission's responsibilities include this aspect of review. Plan
Commission requested that this be an agenda item for a future meeting.
Gary Grouwinkel moved to adjourn the meeting and Bill Reddy seconded the motion. The
motion carried 5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p,m.
J~di;~h M.'C-~IIy, AICP, Planner -
MAYOR ~
Gerald. L. Farley VILLAGE MANAGER
Michael E. Janonis
TRUSTEES
T mohv,.Co,co= Village of Mount Prospect V LLAOECLERK
Paul \Vm ttoefert Velma Lowe
Richard M Lohrstorfer
DermisPrikkel Community Development Department Pho=: ~4,/8~_~:s
Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/818-5329
Irvana K. Wilks i00 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 TDD: 847/392-6064
AGENDA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME:
2nd Floor Conference Room Thursday
Village Hall June 8, 2000
100 South Emerson Street 7:30 a.m.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 6, 2000 meeting
IV. OLD BUSINESS
V. NEW BUSINESS
A. Presentation on Fire Department's Five Year Plan -
Mike Figolah, Village of Mount Prospect Fire Chief
VI. CHAIP,2vlAN' S REPORT
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation
to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 100 S. Emerson~ Mount Prospect,
IL 60056, 847-392-6000~ Ext. $328~ TDD #847-392-6064.
MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
2nd Floor Conference Room, Village Hall
Thursday, April 6, 2000
8:00 a.m.
The meeting of the Economic Development Commission (EDC) of the Village of Mount Prospect was held on
Thursday, April 6, 2000 in the seeond floor conferenee room of Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount
Prospect, Illinois.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Norm Kurtz called the meeting to order at 8:05 a.m. Commissioners John Amdt, Pat Biedar, Ben
Trapani, Bmee Gillilan, Kevin Davies, and David Lindgren were p~sent. Also present were Mayor Gerald Farley
and Michael Blue, D~puty Director of Community Development.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the February 3, 1999 meeting were reviewed and approved unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
Development Update
Mr. Blu~ provided a brief update of economic activity in the Village. He summarized the status of developments
moving through the review and approval process (Jule's Beef and Dogs, CVS Pharmacy, Norwood Phases lA
and lB, and the commercial center at Rand and Kens'mgton). Other projects discussed were the Hobby Lobby,
Count~y Inns and Suites, and 3Com. Mr. Davies provided an overview of the current projects at Randhurst -
including plans for a breakfast orianted restaurant in the former East Side Marie's building. The Commission
discussed possible enhancements being cousidered by [DOT at the Route 83/Kensington/Rand intersection and
asked to be kept informed about possible traffic improvemants there by [DOT.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Finalize EDC Goals for FY2000
Mr. Blue asked if the Coau~fission members had additions or comments for the FY2000 goals of the EDC Annual
Report discussed at the last meeting. Chairman Kurtz stated that he would like for the Commission to align their
tasks with those of the Village Board in order to be~r assist the Board in its decision making. Mr. Lindgren
asked that the EDC be apprised of a recent study about the Mount Prospect Fire Department's personnel and
physical plant. It was decided that this item should be on the agenda for the next meeting and that the Fire Chief
should be invited. Finally, Mayor Farley expressed his concera about Village Boards and Comminsic~s requiring
speeifi¢ building materials for davelopmants during the approval process. He asked that the EDC consider the
potential impacts of th. is activity, up to and inchiding an .Axchiteetural Review Board. It was agreed that Staff
would researoh auoh practices in other communities and the topic would be placed on a future EDC agenda.
B. EDC Link on Village Home Page and other Internet Options
Economic Development Commission
April 6, 2000 Minutes
Page 2
Mr. Blue summarized the memo distributed to the Commissions regarding EDC options for the Village's intemet
web page. The first option was that an economic development section be added to the Village's web page by the
Public Information Officer and MIS Coordinator, with assistance from Community Development staff. This
addition was rather straight forward and would be created by staff in the near future - any comments or
suggestions by the Commissioners was welcomed. A second notion was creation of an Economic Development
newsgroup for the business community. It would create opportunities for businesses to network end create
connections to the Village. It was noted that this type of intemet activity is ve~ free-form and difficult to control.
Commissioners also expressed concern as to whether comments raised on the newsgroup would be responded
to, and by whom. Since it is already possible to e-mail Village staff from the web site regarding economic
development, it was decided that the web site already provides adequate opportunities for questions and
comments. It was suggested that this might be an appropriate forum for the Chamber of Commerco. Consensus
of the Commission was that an economic development section for the web site should proceed, but an EDC
newsgroup should not be implemented. Other suggestions related to the intemet were that the Village assemble
web site and e-mail information through the business license process to facilitate using e-mail for any appropriate
bulk mail items.
C. Formalize Retention Program
Chairman Kurtz introduced this agenda item and there was discussion regarding business retention visits. The
Commission members all agreed that the retention program was vexy useful and they enjoyed participating in the
visits. It was decided that the most desirable way operate the program was for Village staffto set up the visits
and invite members of the Commission
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
Chairman Kurtz announced that a group of downtown business people were organizing as "Do it Downtown".
Their next meeting would be April I0, 2000, and that they would be having a ribbon cutting ceremony to kick-off
Route 83 construction on April 14, 2000. Chairman Kmtz also announced the "Our French Connection" Sister
Cities banquet on May 17, 2000. It was suggested that EDC sponsor a table for its members (staff will determine
who plans on attending and arrange for the table).
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Lindgren moved to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Amdt seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned at
9:05 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Michael Blue, AICP
Deputy Director of Community Development
4-0O