The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1297_0010 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Minois TO* MICHAEL E. JANONIS.'VILLIAGE MANAGER FROM: WILLIAM J. GOONEY, JR., DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: AUGUST 30, 1994 SUBJECT: ZBA-35-CU-94, ZBA-36-V-94, KE1fiH AND JOYCE RUSSOTTO F01TV4VOMIN 11111:�� , i i�' I WAO The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for a Conditional Us6 with a variation at 1918 Wood Lane. Specifically, the applicants are seeking to construct a detached three -car garage and a driveway with a maximum width of 29 feet. The request was reviewed at the regular Zoning Board of Appeals meeting of August 25, 1994. At the meeting, Mr. Keith Russotto presented the request. Mr. Russotto indicated that the larger garage %,W - is requested to park personal vehicles as well as recreation equipment and lawn care items. Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report. He indicated that the garage is designed as a typical three-cargarage and the lot coverage is at the maximum allowed 45%. He further stated the driveway width is necessary to gain access to the garage and it tapers so that only a small portion of the driveway requires the variation. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. By a vote of 7-0 the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the request for a Conditional Use to allow a three -car garage with a variation to allow a 29 foot driveway. wi : hg PST aF Joe VEX �RPOPO�v� 1■1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-35-CU-94 and ZRA,Q�,LqA�_ PETITIONER.- 61froji " TQ: PUBLICATION DATE.: Hearing Date: August 25, 1994 Keith and Joyce Russotto August 10, 1994 (Journal) REQUEST- The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use as required in Section 14.903. A. 8 to allow a detached three -car garage; and a variation to Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 29 feet 'Instead of the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIOES'. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxem Jack Verhasselt Chairman Basnik introduced case ZBA-350CU-94 and case ZBA-36-V-94 being a request for a Conditional Use as required in Section 14.903.A.8 to allow a detached three -car garage; and a variation to Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 29 feet instead of the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. Mr. Keith Russotto introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Russotto stated that he would like to build a 3 car garage to store his snowmobile trailer and a small watercraft. He stated that currently the trailer is parked on the side of the house and feels it would enhance the neighborhood if stored 'Inside. Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Forsythe stated that the Zoning Ordinance allows attached three -car garages and ZBA-35-CU-94 and ZBA-36-V 9 Page 2 1 iy detached three -car garages only with a conditional use permit. The proposed �,,arage is 68, 0' 10 square feet with the dimensions of 22'x 3 1'. The garage is designed as a typ'ical three -c garage with 3 doors with a driveway to match the doors. There is a shed oJ the existin property which will be required to be removed by adding the three car garage. M Forsythe further noted that the d existing ftont yard lot coverage is 37% whic)!i� exceeds th permitted front yarcoverage. The proposal will reduce the front yard lo"�,,,' coverage t 0 Chairman Basnik asked Mr. Forsythe if the garage Will haa ve 3 doors. Mr. F(,,rsythe stte that the• garage will have a double door and a single door. I I Mr. Cassidy asked staff about the current garage that is attached to the house. Mr. Forsythe stated that the garage which is attached to the house will have to b�,,, coverted to living space in order to allow the three car ggarae. Also, Mr. Forsythe stated that the drive will be on the lot line and that it must be pitched toward the petitio ,.iers yard for storm water drainage. Mr. Brettrager stated that there should be a stipulation with the request tha : the shed be required 1[o be removed from the property. Mr. Brettrager then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a Co!iditional Use as required in Section 14.903.A.8 to allow a detached three -car garage A,S Shown on petitioners extu"bit I subject to petitioners removal of the shed on the exisidIng lot. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Cassidy, Floros, Lannon, Luxem, Verhasselt NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Mr. Brettrager then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation to Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 29 feet "Instead 0 of the mam num allowed 22.75 feet as shown on petitioners exhibit 1. The motion was seconded by M r. Cassidy. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Basm*k, Brettrager, Cassidy, Floros, Lannon, Luxem, Verhasselt NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vott� of 7-0. Respeaffifly, sub, *ttedl' A ulie, Ann, Bou,nsi Secretary 191 DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: 11'' 11 1 a 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN RAY P. FORSY E. PLANNEI" I'll AUGUST 16, 1994 1 ZBA-35-CU-94, ZBA-36-V-94 1111 1111 11�11-74111,101 31P1,101*141 -it 1918 WOOD LANE C"o MC 000"W No 1431 %A ON* PI 4"M w') Ole f1k. am 0 om ow '4 on 0" c4 19 1932 3' 429 low I" +tA ow low ow am am 1427 v 0 w 0 0 C4 0 C4 C4 v N .0, 1425 4000 OM -Now OW ow wwo%nn vow I LA at 'm e0'00 A Zm"= =f, 0�- NUM -31 46 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 9,295 sq. ft. %COVERAGE: Current: 32%; Proposed: 45% L , Ll z • 46 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 9,295 sq. ft. %COVERAGE: Current: 32%; Proposed: 45% L , Ll z GI,l B asni k, Chairman Page 2 Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals REQEES.T, requesting a Conditional Use as required in Section 14.903.A.8 t allow a detached The petitioner s eq g q three -car garage; and a variation to Section 14.2215,,A«3 to allow a driveway widtl, of 29 feet instead g � the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. SuMmary of Application: applicants « f�. f e is o be used for the storage of automobiles as recreational «nd lawn « linpact on Properfies: The petitioners garage f spaceto living and construct « detached 0�dinanc� aflows attached three -car garages garages with t conditional use. T -he proposed garagei's• ♦2 square The« • .. designede is garage.a typical three -car setbacks . at allowed 1surface will be proposed. Staff would note that no farther additions to imperviows Pem,tted, without further variations. The drivewayin widthgarage openviing rnd « ecd is Zoning, Ordinance regulates driveway widths by front yard lot coverage. B luse the garage det • d is 22.75 feet. The yi,. and at rear of the property the mam mum width it existing coverageftont yard, lot drivewaypropos4M, front yard lot coverage is 27%. This 'is a result of the removal of the exi Aing ansldewalk,,. " V En , has indicated that the petitioner will be required to submit a gradir, g plan for the new gag g e with the building permit. OMI I EnA N e with Www petitioner « • conditional and variation ♦ / « • M r 111� total lot coverage th e, necessary driveway,. The proposed garage requirementM « +~ « «no objection to the conditional use. The re.Auestedvariation neededetitioner has accessgarage.to the « «o that not ' ex,ce I ss, I we amount of pavement. Staff has •objection VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois q1 . ................ TOO MICHAEL E. JANONIS,VILLAGE MANAGER FROM WILLIAM J. LOONEY, JR.-, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: AUGUST 31, 1994 SUBJECT: ZBA-37-V-94, PALATINE OIL COMPANY (WINi(EL NN' S) 1 1 11N1111i[e) 0 - I MERTUIX"A"11 L ILV V go FIVA2 * N 8 The Zoning Board transmits for your consideration a Variation request subrnitted by the Palatine Oil Company. Specifically the petitioners are seeking a variation from Section 14.1804.A to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback inort t i i The request was reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their regular meeting or August 25, 1994. At the meeting, Mr. Ron Cox of the Palatine Oil Company indicated that they are attempting to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency requirements for Phase Il Vapor Recovery and at the same time would like to relocate the fuel dispensers to better define traffic patterns. He further stated that the canopy would be a convenience to customers. Mr. Cox indicated that the lot would be resurfaced and striped and the building will be repainted to Marathon standards. He concluded that they will agree to the conditions outlined by staff in their report. Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report. He indicated that the subj ect property is the first property seen by travelers entering downtown Mount Prospect. He indicated that staff has met with the petitioners several times to come up with a plan which creates a more visually appealing site design. Mr. Forsythe discussed the existing setbacks in this area as well as the unique shape of the subject property. He indicated that staff can support the request with the following conditions: The petitioner shall install public sidewalk and grass parkway along the property's Central Road and Northwest Highway frontages. These improvements must be installed within one year of approval of a final ordinance for the variation. 2, The petitioner shall install concrete curb around the perimeter of this property to control storm water and ensure that vehicles do not park on the public sidewalks. 3. The asphalt parking lot and drives shall be reconstructed and restriped in accordance with attachment "A". Michael E. Janonis Page 2 August 3L, 1994 4. The petitioner shall upgrade the landscaping material around the property and ensure that it is maintained. 5. The petitioner shall submit a signage package to staff for review and app oval. All signage shall comply with Village Codes. Mr. Bill Reddy, 105 S. Elm Street, addressed the Zoning Board to raise concerns,vith how cars are ensure that this parked on the lot and with stacking of used tires in the rear alley. He asked that st., is not continued. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. By a vote of 7-0, the Zoning, Board of Appeal recommends approval ofthe vart" att"ons, requested va*,'th the conditions ofthe staf"' report,. u.. pS� .;PobbLt> 5y PI f4fa tx, pr O�k r W11!IWIMOM• I-MaIllrojiff"10L 61RIOUMEUM912:13M pop Hearing Date: August 251, 1994 Palatine Oil Co., (Winkelman's Service Stn) 3 10 N. Northwest Hwy. A 6 1 1 a A 0 a Fli,EQUEST", The petitioners are seeking variations to Sections 14.1804.A. I and 14.1804.A.3 to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy. - ■ Gilbert Basru*k, Chaiman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidv Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxern Jack Verhasselt Chairman Baslu"k then introduced case ZBA-37-V-94 being a request for variations to Sections 14.1804.A. I and 14.1804.A.3 to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy. Mr. Ron Cox, Presidentl Palatine Oil Company, Palatine, IL, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Cox stated that he is requesting a variation to the setback requirements to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and install a canopy. He stated that Mr. Joe Pence) leasing dealer for this service station is planning on improving the property to meet EPA regulations which need to be done by November 1, 1994. Mr Cox stated that because of the configuration of the lot they need the variation to improve traffic flow. He further noted that he has met with staff and has agreed to make other improvements to the property which will enhance the property. ZBA7,37-'V-94I Pagle, �2 ho Is, As MW A's 0 . # Chairman Basnik then asked Mr. Forsythe if star"' checked with the petitioner xit , n regards to staff conditions. Mr. Forsythe stated that the petitioner agrees to cc nply to the ni ion about a conditions staff recommends. Also in response to Cha"man Bas *k's ques Fence on theproperty,, Mr. Forsythe noted there is not a fence and there is ell, public afley behind the property. ZBA-37-V-94 Page 3 The Board generally discussed the request for variation, noting to staff the safety concerns raised by Mr. Reddy. Mr. Cassidy then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation from Section 14.1804.A.1 and Section 14.1804-A.3 to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and to install. a new canopy as shown on petitioners exhibit I and subject to staff conditions I through 5 listed above. Mr. Brettrager seconded the motion. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Cassidy, Floros, Lannon, Luxem, Verhasselt The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Mr. Floros then stated that he commends Mr. Reddys comments and concerns with regards to the overall improvement of the downtown redevelopment area and hopes that the petitioner and staff addresses the safety issues at this site. Res'pectfbl su Boun*s Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GEL BASN]1K,, CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY P, FORSYTHE., PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 17, 1994 CASE NO.: ZBA-37-V-94 APPLICANT: PALATINE OIL COMPANY (WIlq(ELMANN'S) i 0193 v col Gil , Bas,nik, Chairman M� ,ount, Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals I Om je The petition, rs are seeki,n an"afion, from Section 14.1804.A to allow strictures within the m1pimurnreq*ed 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fbel dispenser islands z�lnd to instaH a new N« 1M� Mai ...................... Summary of'Applicatilon# The application indicates the service station is requesi,jng to relocate the plump islands, in; ordler to iimprove traffic, flow. Also indicated is that the locati(,,n,, of the proposed cano� y is, witfuin, the required 30 foot setbacks. p linpact on Surrounding Properties: The subject property is triangular in shap and fronts on the intersed,iort of Northwest Ffighway and Central Road. Because of the unique s�iape of the lot the required, 30 foot setbacks are difficult to maintain. The existing building is set baq,..k less than I foot ftm,, the Central Road property Kne and approximately 22 feet from the Northwest "Highway property tine., The proposedcan, owould, be located, 7 &et from, the Central R oad propeity, line and, 18 Beet py &om Northwest Ffighway. The fuel dispensers are proposed to be set back 17 feet jr''rom Central Road I a ' 28 , feet fto,m Northwest Highway. n The petitioner has, indicated that the lot will be resudaced and stn*ped and that the A'ervice station wiU be painted to meet Marathon standards. The landscaping areas will be repaired md new materials is ff encouraged by the petitioner's desire to upgrade the propery. Staand the Installed. Staff petitioner have had many discussions regarding ways of improving the overall Appearance of this property This propertys location at the western entrance to the Central Business District highlights the importance of creating a visually appealing site design. This is the first propetity that individuals ,see as they travel eastbound into downtown Mount Prospect. Currently, the pr(,,, 'perty lacks public J sidewalks, a grass parkway and curbed/defined entrances. In addition, paAked vehicles are scattered over the site and onto the public right-of-way. 1 11, I Staff recommends that the petitioner be required to install public sidewalk and gr,;, ss parkway alon the property's Central Road and Northwest Ffighway frontages. The Village h&t a yearly sidewal repla,cern, nt program which is administered through our Engineering Division. Homeowners an bus-iness, owners can sign up to have their sidewalks replaced by a Village coutractor and pay si�cantly reduced cost. Staff would recommend that the petitioner participate ir this program an I ioner mus grass parkway and a public sidewalk in the spring of 1995. In addit*on, tie petit* in",, concrete curb around the perimeter of his property to control storm water Md to ensure tha vehicles do not park on the public sidewalks. The downtown, area, is iirriprroved with many, structures With reduced setbacks., Wlith thelots shap� I i difficult to maintain the required setbacks and provide adequate parking. Th�t 1 existing buildin t i's 01 is 'constructed,, less than I fbot from the north property line. The relocated pump il�]ands and canop will not cause a negative impact on the surrounding properties. The traffic flow wiL be improved an the parking lot will be striped and better controlled. I Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 Engineering has indicated that the sidewalk program is available for the installation of curbing and sidewalk. The Fire Department has indicated that the vapor recovery is a favorable change. Public Works has indicated that an inlet on the north side will need to be repaired and adjusted with the pavement/sidewalk replacement. Eno The petitioners are seeking variations to allow the relocation of the fuel dispenser islands and the addition of an overhead canopy. Staff believes the relocated fuel dispenser will improve the traffic flow on-site and the canopy will be a convenience to the customers and will not negatively impact the surrounding properties. Staff is encouraged by the potential upgrade to the property and would recommend approval of the variations with the following conditions: The petitioner shall install public sidewalk and grass parkway along the property's Central Road and Northwest Highway frontages. These improvements must be installed within one year of approval of a final ordinance for the variation. 2. The petitioner shall install concrete curb around the perimeter of this property to control storm water and ensure that vehicles do not park on the public sidewalks. 3. The asphalt parking lot and drives shall be reconstructed and restriped in accordance with attachment "A". 4. The petitioner shall upgrade the landscaping material around the property and ensure that it is maintained. A landscape plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning for review and approval. 5. The petitioner shall submit a signage package to staff for review and approval. All signage shall comply with Village Codes. 4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois D q c� g� SU 0 BJECT, ZBA-39-A-94., VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS I The Zoning Board transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for various Zoning Ordinance Amendments proposed by staff. The request was reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their regular meeting of August 25, 1994. At the meeting, Ray Forsythe, Planner, discussed the request. Attached to this memo are the proposed changes. The Zoning Board discussed the requested changes and indicated their support. There was discussion on item #6 which relates to the length of time a temporary trailer can be kept on an approved construction site. Staff has farther reviewed this and has made a revision to the proposed language which indicates the Building Code shall apply to the approved length of time. By a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as detailed in the staff memo dated August 18,1994. MINUTES OF' THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA -. 9-A 9 Hearing Date.- August 25,1994 PETITIONER.- Village of Mount Prospect SUBJECT PROPERTY."": None PUBLICATION DATE' - August 10, 1994 QUESY The Village is seeking to amend various Sections of Chapter 14 "Zom*ng" of the Municipal Code. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basm"k, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Lucy Jack Verhasselt ABSENT None OBJECTORSANTERESTED PARTIES: None I Chairman B asni then introduced case ZBA-39-V-94 being a request to amend van*ous Sections of Chapter 14 "Zoning". of the Municipal Code. Village Planner, RA y Forsythe outlined the proposed amendments to the overall Zoning Code Amendment made *in October 1993. The 'following proposed changes to the amendments will further address clarification of the Zu. * Amendments. ing 1. 14.304.C. Number of Buildings on a Kesid ntial Zoning Lot. Mr. Forsythe stated that 0 staff proposes the importance of specifying only I principal use in all zoning parcels so that I person could not put 2 commercial buildings up and not be required to put a Planned UnitDevelopmen t. This should include commercial and industrial properties. 2. 14.302.D. Regulations for rences and Walls. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff would note that currently the Ordi cep rov des for a 3 foot setback to provide a visual * clearance when a driveway arra `ence intersect. Staff would like to change the Ord'nance to *include m rear yarc' 7RA-39-A-94 &".&.*W Page 3 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASN10K-, CRAH04AN FROMS RAY P. FORSY PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 18., 1994 mim X01 11!111111t A$G,,,4 oil 11 :1.11111i q 10�03 1:4 ki 1131 Outlined below are proposed zoning text amendments that staff has drafted in response to issues that have been raised since the overall Zoning Code Amendment last October. Please review the proposed amendments and be prepared to discuss these items at our August 25th public hearing. a 3M Currently the Zoning Ordinance limits one principal building on a residential lot and is silent on commercial/industrial districts. The proposed amendment includes all districts unless there is a Planned Unit Development. C .�yrrety W din�,.! Not more than one principal building shall be located on any zoning lot in a residential zoning district, except in the case of a planned unit development in the multi -family residential &sfticts, where more than one principal buil&ng on a zoning lot shall be allowed as part of a planned unit development. Provosved-w' Not more than one principal building shall be located on any zoning lot in a zoning district, except in the case of a PUD, where more than one principal building on a zoning lot shall be allowed as part of a PUD. The previous Zoning Ordinance permitted fences on comer lots with a I foot setback. The revised Zoning Ordinance requires a 3 foot setback which was developed to provide adequate site lines. The proposed amendment will resolve the site line issue on lots which have a sideyard driveway or alley and permit a I foot setback on comer lots with no drives. Current !Lorjin ..g 1. b(2) On Comer lots, anyfence shall be placed entirely behind the principal building and maintain a three foot (3' setback from property line along exterior side yard. Zoni*ng Ordinance Amendment Page,,2 PronplgdHordinv On comer lots, any fence shall be placed entirely behind f building and maintain a I foot setback from the property line along exterior si6eyards. However, when the fence intersects with a driveway, alley or right-of-way a sight triangle must be maintained. j There 'is currently a required 10 foot setback between pools and the princi )aI structure. The amendment pemu*ts pools to be attached to a deck which is attached to the )n"ncipal structure. Oirrent W9M , 4 Separation Between Buildings. A detached accessory building or structure shall be located no closer to the principal building than ten feet except, where a detached garage is constructed withfire-rated &ywall to meet the requirements Mount Prospect Building Code. However, the minimum separation permitted is threeft fro osod Word6tat, 4. Separation Between Buildings. A detached accessory building or structure shall be located no closer to the principal building than ten feet (N), except where a detached garage is constructed with fire -rated drywall to meet �e requirements of Mount Prospect Budding Code. However, themn' =*wn separation permitted is three feet (3). Decks attached to the principal building are permi"tited to attach to a swimming pool if all required rear and sideyard setbacks are t and the deck is designed with a gate between the deck and pool and access is pi�� ovided to the yard from the deck. There is a Building Code requirement for a 15 foot rear yard setback for wimnu'ng pools. The present language in the Zoning Ordinance is not clearly written in regardob.-I to setbacks. The proposed amendment clarifies the required setbacks and makes the Zoning Clode consisted with the Building Code. Current Worifigg Swimming pools shall be located entirely behind the rear line of thoolo building of the ptincipal structure on the lot in the R-1, R -A R-2, and R -X Districts. Swomming pools shall not be permitted in any requiredyard front or exterior side yards. LWard,t Swimming pools shall be located entirely behind the rear line of the building of th I principal structure on the lot in the R-1, R -A, R-2, and R -X D`�'Istricts. Swimrmo a pools shall not be permitted in any required &ont, side or exterio.- side yards. Pool �I Zoning Ordinance Amendments Page 3 are permitted to encroach into the rear yard provided a minimum of fifteen (15) feet is maintained from the rear property line to the edge of the structure. MAN— A- Currently the ordinance allows eaves, chimneys and bay windows to encroach into a required sideyard. To clarify that eaves include storm gutters,, storm gutters are being added to the list of permitted encroachments. B. Swimming pools are being added to the permitted encroachment in a rear yard. This clarifies the required setback. C. Air conditional units are required to be placed in the rear yard. The ordinance permits a sideyard unit if for efficiency reasons it cannot be placed in the rear. This amendment clarifies the A. requirements to place a unit on the side and also requires screening. 0, fgaenj ULdor in& .w... " Aese structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards, as follows: 2. Faws, chimneys and bay windows extending into such yards not more than twenty-fiour (24) inches, however, in no case shall any such obstruction be located within twelve inches (12') of a property line. P ...... Wordint These structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards, as follows: 2. Eaves, storm gutters, chimneys and bay windows extending into such yards not more than twenty-four (24) inches, however, in no case shall any such obstruction be located within twelve inches (12") of a property line. Current Wordi o 3. Patios, balconies, wood decks and handicapped ramps may encroach in the required rear yard; provided a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet is maintained between the rear property line and the near edge of the structure, and that no structure is located over or upon an easement. RaWicapped ramps may encroach into 50% of a required sideyard Pro vosed'Wordine; 3. Patios, balconies, wood decks, swimming pools and handicapped ramps may encroach in the required rear yard; provided a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet is maintained between the rear property line and the near edge of the structure, and that no structure is located over or upon an easement. Handicapped ramps may encroach into 50% of a required sideyard. Zoming Ordinance Amendment Page, 4, 1 Current 6. Central air conditioning units shall be located on the rear elevatic n of any principal structure. If the unit cannot be reasonably placed on the rear ele-)ation because of operational reasons, such unit may be placed in up to twenty-five porcent (25%) of a required side ard provided such location does not result in exhaust di�,. scharge upon any Y 9 adjoining building or vegetation. Pr0D0JCd Word* 6. Central air conditioning units shall be located on the rear elevatit)n of any principal structure. If the unit cannot be reasonably placed on the rear elil. 1wation because of operational reasons'. such unit may be placed in up to twenty-nV� , percent (251) of a required sideyard, provided such location does not result in exhat ist discharge upon any adjoining building or vegetation. Documentation verifying t1at the unit cannot be located at the rear of the structure shall be submitted by tl-�e air conditioning installer and approved by the Director of Planning. A screening plan which includes fencing or landscaping must be submitted with the permit an(. - approved by the Director of Planning. p Currently the Zorling Ordinance permits temporary trailers for approved corstruction project This amendment permits temporary classrooms for up to one year. This item Will also b renumbered and moved from "Standards for the R-3 and R-4 Zoning Distn'cts." There.was mistake made when numbering the ordinance. I Current Jfl;�rIAM, Temporary buildings or structures may be allowed subject to the Jollowoovg reguiationj i. Temporary trailers orfacifities,fi)r approved construction projects c rre permittedfor a period of one (1) year. Such facilities shall be located to conform ul ith the applicable setback requirements of the Zoning, Ordinance. Ae facility shall be removed upon completion of the construction project. Proviosed Word, *-- - Temporary Uses, 1. Temporary trailers or facilities for approved construction pr6lects are permitte L,,Aar Ew subject to the standards of the Building 0 -de. Such facilitie shall be located to conform with the applicable setback requirerrents of the Zoni Ordinance. The facilities shall be removed upon completion (if the constructio project. I 2. Temporary trailers used as classrooms or other similar uses thai are ancillary to an existing school use are permitted for up to one year. Such facilit� ies shall be located Zoning Ordinance Amendments 4 Page 5 to conform with the applicable setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, J�JB-N" Currently the ordinance allows structures located on lots which are 50 feet or less to extend into the required setback as long as a minimum of 50% of the standard is maintained. This allows properties which may only encroach by a small amount to extend further into the setback. This amendment would permit the building or structure to be extended at the established setback and does not allow any further encroachments. The amendment also includes lots which are 55 feet or less. The R -A District typically contains lots which are 50'-55' in width. Accessory structures on lots which are 5 5' or less are peMU*tted a reduced 3 foot setback. Current,Wordi However, on lots 54 feet or less in width, a non -conforming building or structure may be extended in a required rear yard or side ym-d, provided that such non -conform i ty is no more than 500 of the current rear yard or sideyard requirement. Provosed Word.1- M,': However, on lots 55 feet or less in width, a non -conforming building or structure may be extended with the established setback in a required rear yard or sideyard, provided that such non-confornu*ty is no more than 50% of required setback. 8. 14.1702. Perm fitted Uses. Currently parking lots and structures are a permitted and conditional use in the B-3 District. This amendment eliminates this duplication and requires a conditional use for a parking lot or parking structure as the principal use. Current" Emdin 45. Parking lots and structures Delete parking lots and structures (#45) as a permitted use in this Section. Because circular driveways ar typically a convenience and not necessarily a hardship, staff is proposing they be permitted only as a conditional use. Lot coverage requirements will be in effect and variations will be required if the front yard or total lot coverage exceeds the maximum allowed. Currew Wordin,r., 1. Number. One driveway may be permitted per lot, with a maximum of one (1) curb -cut onto the street pavement per driveway. Circular or dual frontage driveways may be Zon'm*g Ordinance Amendments P e6 Number. One driveway may be permitted per lot, with a maximum of one (1) curb -cut onto the street pavement per driveway. Circular or dual fiontage driveways may be permitted only by Conditional Use. 10. 14.2217, In Yards. Parldng lots in non-residential areas must meet the required building setbacks. Staff is proposing 4 to reduce the parking setbacks to 10 feet, unless it abuts residential. Ten f b.et is sufficient to provide adequate landscaping and all applicable lot coverage and interior lot L, Mdscaping will be in force. This will permit some cult lots to be developed which are restrictcd because of dual frontages. Current Wordi Off-street parkinsetbacks shall meet the requirements of the specific zt ining g district. P D ,osid-Hording'.1, Off-street parking shall conform with the following standards: A. Residential Districts. Off-street parking shall meet the rei luired setbacks of the specc district. B. Non -Residential Districts. Off-street parking s be permit', ed within ten feet (10) of the property line unless adjacent to single family rtSidential districts. Off-street parking shaff be prohibited in required yards that are adjacent to single family residential districts. # 1: There is currently a conflict with the accessory structure standards for dumpstltr screening. This amendment resolves the conflict and requires all four sides to be screened. Corrent Wordinp., I E. Screening of Refuse Disposal Areas,. All refuse disposal areas shall be screened on at least three (3) sides by a solid wood fence or an equivalent screening matit 1.rial to a height of six feet (61). PIm6vos,e;*,d'WoridgI, --- W - Screening of Refuse Disposal Areas. All refuse disposal areas sh.:fll be screened on all four sides by a sofid wood fence or an equivalent screening mati trial to a height of six feet (6). Zoning Ordinance Amendments Page 7 A definition of "sight triangle" is proposed to identify the required setback for fences on comer lots which intersect with driveways or alleys. L Sight Triangle.- No improvements shall be placed, nor plant materials allowed to grow within the sight triangle so as to obstruct or limit the sight distance of motorists. Such a triangle shall have legs of twenty five feet (25') along the rights-of-way line when two (2) streets intersect and ten feet (10') along the right-of-way line and the driveway edge when a street and a driveway intersect. The maximum height of any obstruction shall be three feet (3') within the sight triangle, unless otherwise permitted by the Municipal Code. RPF: hg TAIN Mount Prospect Public Works Department lot INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM IM CnN USA TOS Village Manager FROM: Director of Public works DATE: August 25, 1994 SUBJ: Parkway Restoration Bids Sealed bids were opened on August 23, 1994, for contractual parkway restoration. Bid results are attached. This contract provides for the restoration of excavations made in Village parkways for water main breaks, hydrant replacements, etc. The specified work includes excavation and disposal of sand/stone/clay, replacement with topsoil, compaction, sod in- stallation and one watering. In addition to prices for regular sod, we sought prices for salt -tolerant sod because there has been some indication that IDOT may require that in some of their right-of-way. The Base Bid price is determined by a cost per square yard of sod and is for 76 sites known at the time of bid letting. At this point in time it is unknown how many total sites will need restoration during the term of the contract; although we expect approximately 175 sites will need restoration by May, 1995. We have checked the references provided by the lower bidder, American Landscaping; all reports were satisfactory,. On page 191 of the 1994/95 budget, $11,000-00 has been budgeted for contractual parkway restoration (Account #41-072-05-6250). Additionally, on page 192 $6000.00 has been budgeted for restora- tion materials (Account #61-072-06-7329). 1 recommend award of a contract to the lowest per unit bidder, American Landscaping, in an amount not to exceed $17,000.00. Herbert L. Weeks HLW/eh PWRESTFA.LL/FILES/BIDS BID RESULTS PARKWAY RESTORATION 8/23/94 mew t�%onal Bid for, in 1995 Price Total Price Price Per Sq. Yd. Prl*ce/Sq.Yd. Prl*,ce/Sq,Yd.. Per Sq.Yd,. - - - - ------------ Regular Sod Salt Tolerant Sod Regular Salt Salt Tolerant Sod -erican Landscape 4.94 2934.36 5.94 4.94 5e94 D & J Landscaping 5,75 3421,25 6.75 5,75 6.75 Koch & Son 9.00 5346,00 11.00 9.25 11,00 Kabayama Const. Inc. 10,00 5940,00 10.30 10,45 10,75 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT mouw Pitospscr ,v az-Aw0a 600$ XWGIXEMUNG CANIS ON EqTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager FROM: Fred Tennyson, Project Engineer DATE: August 30, 1994 SUBJECT: Pheasant Trail & Cottonwood Lane Street Lighting Improvement On August 30, 1994 at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the Pheasant Trail and Cottonwood Lane Street Lighting Improvements. At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud. Four Contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of 3 Contractors submitted bids. The bids range from a low of $68,286.75 by Lyons Electric to a high of $70,352.50 by Contracting & Materials Co. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $82,300.00. ,go's All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 5% of their total bid as required by the Contract Documents. All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. B11D BIDDERS T'O'T, ,L.... Lyons Electric $689286.75 Aldridge Electric $69$314.00 Contracting & Materials $709352.50 Engineer's Estimate $822300.00 QQALIEJQADDY, �J LOW BID The low bidder Lyons Electric (formerly Pinner Electric) is currently maintaining the Village traffic signals. Their quality of work has been very good. ........... ............. I I; i 9"rAILIL The Village is familiar with the services provided by Lyons Electric Company. They perform their work in a timely manner and are very conscientious about their quality of workmanship. The Engineering Division recommends awarding them this contract. However, b gi 01 "/woff Pheasant'Trai"ICottonwood Drive, Street Lh,,trig ng,!',,,,rov,em,en,t August 3 0, 19,94 Page 2 n unit prices, the Engi eering Division also recommends extending the contract to Oleo Owhich is the amount approved in the Community Development Block Grant Fund G)., This will enable the Village to add more street lights along Pheasant Trail and Lavergne Drive. Fundin,,g for this project is shown on Page 158 of the 1994/1995 budget under Account Code N 13-062-06-8018 which currently has $58,700. This amount is in error. The bAgeted amoun should blie, the same as was approved in the Community Developmew� Block Gran budget/application resolution showing $82,700. The difference between the two figures i $24,000 and was caused by staffs estimated December, 1993 budget of $325,(1. 1 100. The actu. grant award, was for $349,000. concur with the above recommendation Mr. M- C* Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services Ilerb Weeks, Director of Public Works Village of Mow -it Prospect Pheasant Trail & Cottonwood Street Ugliting Iniprovenients Augest 30, 1994 10:00 A.M. Lyons electric Company Lyons Ill., 605.34 all •Unit Price Total a 11 ram ml 1-11 a 111 0 U 1211-1vVe m [so] 9 11 1 1.95 5,265.00 MORI 1► i114.30 18,590 12.30 79800.00 i191,500.00 m "-a 89610.30 723.00 14,250.00 630.001 9,450.00 HIM UJIVNINKLI111614 1,228.3 1814' 24.65 1 1 199.00 11650.00 24,750.00 19800.00 2700.00 19000.00 10000.00 13,0()().00 1,000.00 190()().00 1,000.00 '11,000.00 1 OCK).00� 572.85 572.85 984.00 984.00 1,250.00 19250.00 19225.00 9,225.00 42.68 61 46.00 ... ... ......... 690.00 29250.00 Volvo e I 2.91 11$640.00 3.40 13600.00 3.25 139000.001 6.30 21,835.001 5.50 2*475. 0 5.00 2t250.00 708.75 708.751 34 1 90C)O.00 TO : Village Manager • FROM: Director Public Works DATE: September 1, 1994 SUBJECT: Pump Replacement Bid Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 A.M. on August 30, 1994 for the replacement of a high service pump at our No. 5 pumping station at Highland and Emerson. Invitational bids were sent out plus advertising as required. This proposed work is for the final phase of pump replacement at our No. 5 pumping station. In this multiyear improvement/replacement program, all stations will now be completed, with the exception of our No. 4 station at Prospect Avenue and Waverly. Bid results as follows: Gaskill and Walton Construction Co. 3,R -4 375 Tri -Con Corporation Pa A.J. Lowe & Son Inc. $46F460 Engineer's estimate ($42y000) On page 191 of the existing budget, under account code 61-072-05-8031, there was $85,000 allocated for this project. Our consulting engineers, Winfield Engineers Inc., have reviewed all of - the bids, and they recommend, and I concur, to accept the lowest bid as submitted by Gaskill and Walton Construction Co, for $38,325.00. Herbert L., Weeks HLW/td attach. HIGHPUMPeRES/FILES/BIDS WINFIELD ENGINEERS, INC. John E. Phipps, PE Professional Consulting Engineers President ........... — ---- ........ - ------ - August 31, 1994 Honorable President and Board of Trustees Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Subject: High Service Pump Replacement at Pump Station No. 5 Bid Report Gentlemen: In accordance with your instructions, the Proposals for High Service Pump Replacement at Pump Station No. 5 have been tabulated and reviewed. Findings and recommendations from this review are presented. 1. General Proposals, as published in the Paddock Daily Herald on August 18, 1994, were received, opened and read aloud at 10:00 A.M. , Standard Central Time, on August 30, 1994, in accordance with the Invitation To Bid. Proposals were invited for the construction of a high service pump replacement within an existing building at Pump Station No. 5. 2. Proposals Received Three proposals were received, all of which were accompanied by the required bid security. The bidders, the amount of their bids, bid security and Engineer's Cost Opinion are shown on the' enclosed bid tabulation. The low bid for the high service pump replacement is 9.6% below the Engineer's Cost Opinion. 3-s Irregularities A. Gaskill and Walton Construction Co. and Tri -Con Corporation proposals: (1) Section 00480, "Noncollusion Affidavit" was not filled out and signed. 5534 N. Oliphant Ave. • Chicago, IL 50631 e Phone/Fax 312/775-4725 Honorable President and Board of Trustees August 31, 1994 Page 2 Although the Noncollusion Affidavit was not filled out by the two lowest Bidders,r the Bid Form in Section 00300 contains a declaration that the Did is made without collusionr which is mad effective by signing the Bid'Form. All Bidders signed the Bid Form. I No other irregularities were noted.. 4, Qualifications of Bidderl We have reviewed the qualifications of the apparEnt ' low bidder, Gaskill and Walton Construction Co., and they appear qualified to construct the high service pump replaceMEInt. Based on our review of the technical aspects of Lhe bids,, it is our opinion that the project should be awarded to the apparent low bidder, Gaskill and Walton Construction Co. The award would be made to Gaskill and Walton C=s triuct "ion, Co.,,, in, thi;,,,i, azo,utn.t of Our recommendation on award is subject to the opinion of the I Village At'orney* I Yours very truly, ld Eng nes Inc,., Terrence JI* fodnik P.E* cc: Mr. Herb Weeks VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT HIGH SERVICE PUMP REPLACEMENT AUGUST 31, 1994 COMPANY BID BID BOND GASKILL & WALTON CONSTR.. CO. $38,325 PO BOX 367 S. CHICAGO HEIGHTS, IL 60411 708-7.58-1050 TRI -CON CORP. $44,375 16710 S. RICHMOND HAZE LCR.E ST, IL 60429 738-331-8484 A. J. LOWE & SON, INC. $469460 633 R O G E RS STREET DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 708-969-1990 YES YES YES NON -COL. AFFIDAVIT NO m YES MAINTAIN Mount Prospect Public Works Department II77UU CM USA NTEROFFCE MEMORANDUM ------------- TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: September 1, 1994 SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results for Water Main Replacement Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 A.M. on August 30, 1994,for the proposed replacement of water main on the north side of Golf Road between I -Oka and Wa-Pella. There were nine invitational bids sent out plus advertising as required. We received the following eight responses: 00 Patnick Construction Inc John Nero.Construction Co, Inc, "J31,255,00 Down Under Construction Inc. 136,150,00 Lo Verde Construction Co. 141,711.00 Vian Construction Co. Inc. 151,330.00 Neri Brothers Construction Inc. 172,311*75 Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete Inc. 177F750,00 George W. Kennedy Construction Co, Inc. 212,910.00 Engineer's estimate ($126,380.00) On page 161, account code 61-072-10-8724 of the current budget, there was $150,000 allocated for this proposed work. On this section of water main, we have been experiencing numerous fail- ures. Compounding the problem is that the existing water main in this area is under Golf Road and, with the heavy traffic on Golf, the repair times are lengthy. Our consulting engineer recommends, and I concur, to accept the low bid as submitted by Patnick Construction Inc. at $130F240*00 to replace water main on the north side of Golf Road between I -Oka and Wa-Pella. A,e-rb,ert L, Weeks HLW/td attach* GOLFMAIN*RES/FILES/BIDS JKL CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS LTD. 834 E. RAND ROAD, SUITE 13 MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056 . . .. . ........ (708) 870-9742 FAX (708) 870-9743 0 a G is A 3-116mmmm=14 Mr. Herb Weeks, Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect 1700 W. Central Mount Prospect, IL 60056 REF: Golf Road Water Main project Our Project No. 0289 Dear Mr. Weeks, Q k Jill FZ W Should any questions arise, please feel free to call our office. Very truly yours, JKL CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS LTD. 1007 Steve Lesak, P.E. SL:jr Enclosure miY MAINTAIN Mount Prospect Public Works Department rn SA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7M CU . . . ............... TO Village Manager vol FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: August 22, 1994 SUBJ: Christmas Decorations In 1979, the Village entered into the first of five, three year contracts with Folger Flag and Decorating for the rental of pole mounted Christmas decorations. These contracts included all illuminated decorations hung from Village -owned street lights in the Village's downtown area. In each contract the contractor was responsible for installation, repair, removal and storage of all decorations. The original contract covered 56 poles which grew to 96 poles in 1991. With the addition of the new poles on Maple Street and on Emerson in front of the library this new contract will be for 106 poles. As in the past the Public Works Department solicited proposals from other suppliers, but in each case, we found that there were other companies who could supply the decorations but no one could provide the same service of installation, repair and stor- age. In addition to this, in all cases the actual cost of a direct purchase was higher than what we were quoted by Folger's for the full service* Proposals were requested for 106 illuminated decorations: 30 five (5) foot star snowflakes; 46 eight (8) foot sparkle trees; and 45 eight(8) foot bells (15 poles on Northwest Hwy, to have two(2) bells each and 15 poles to have one(l) bell each). Pro- posals received were: Display Sales $34,732o55 Temple Displays $34F193-60 Folgers Flag & Decorating $33,000.00 Display Sales and Temple Displays were for direct purchase whereas Folgers' price was for a three year rental includ- ing installation, removal, repair and storage payable at the rate of $11,000 per year. The last 3 year contract, 1991-93, with Folgers was for 96 poles at $27,000 ($9,000 per year), 7 Based on the above proposals I request th= bage Board waive the bidding process and award a _re (3 c n,tract to V_7� Folger Flag and Decorating for a total 'f year. The contract will 'include 106 decorations and c,oY,, t,i, repair, removal and storage. Funding for this proposed expend."L'ture can be found on Page 237, Account No. 01-081-03-6624 where'there is $11,000 allocated. I kkkqch-t ':: 16 Herbert L. Weeks ool , 4j 1 ml*Yn , a � u ^ �.,�m NT^ or aA x �*a , ��" � w %NFo r iyX'w4 ..iA�m All lo Q.r h l 11 *11 loo No, ° " r Irl ry" w *+.,>u r ^ ^, r 7. k,y, 01 of It v .yc ° ' � ;� w �".� `yu! �lb *" '�' ' �� .!nl` � w '�, 'u✓0" a y � >� � .Iw. T �,■y� n �l i `rn 01 1. lollI '*W4"M ,IN- " Ay A ll ;iRl n RL. �^ , way avn tly,w w 0 u I X ,; *' �'�" ��'�wr*�'� �yw� ;xy r �:" •; „ � °". �" "�''x "�� ,�'^ I,,, ,. '� .*. ,. /' ^.mm . +� �� I P. :'* ^ �.. ^ „u , �" " ,�✓ '. . ,°a` amu.. �. ,;.�� "rw rv,,.b I bgIlk ", »�1,-MiZz - x 'Ar" n.� '',° ,w,• Y I, I, X I YI I N I r rtu x »f .• m ®xm,''� * w �,, -""' w � +*r oll " x N'ow^w� r iµ No ro .rro'i",, �". w, ;, * ,,, r *r"",,�.. x�' ,c ,n ,.. '* '"" , i',.. & W,�, '° on �.°•a " �, w...�.� ".,r,n,--ix�,. ;°°tint r+v,.. s�- ry ux; n x-' ° * * 014011 4",."7"' r '00 ��h wr. - n< *, r «, � ,;,,. III>'��' �� '..® Nn x, "w �,rrn ... .�" � ^R' v n i, , �"ie*'! , '. n w, a,r." * .,w" ,.W"r �a +�„ , 'W� °" °" 'www „, , ,.,, � ,� rRr r,. ' N � n:, n ' ... r� ".• An`"." ,* " �; ;� � , � ^` � �^ --"w , , � . �, r" III; y„ �" " °° 7i Nk �` . „" ^„ w wr +w, +,. n * * r!"wXi MAINTAIN Mount Prospect Public Works Department . .......... M C1, t M INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 4 TO: Village MAnager FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: August 18, 1994 SUBJ: Request from Rust Environmental to Adjust Consulting Fee There is a request from Rust Environment and Infrastructure to increase their construction management fee for the Hatlen Heights sewer project by $18,000. As you may recall on August 17, 1993, the Village approved an increase of $359,595 to Ganna Construction Co. for augering a 60 inch pipe underneath Busse Road at Lincoln. Due to poor soil conditions and conflicts with existing utilities extraordinary precautions were planned to accomplish this installation which has caused significant de- lays. Special techniques and equipment were required due to those unfavorable conditions. In September of 1993 Rust Environmental was issued a change order increasing their fee, but that fee was based on the pre- mise that the augering, final connections/installations and restoration work would be done simultaneously with other work then currently in progress. Unfortunately through a series of mishaps and unforeseen delays this final phase of work did not begin until late July. As of this date the auger pit on Hatlen at Lincoln is nearly completed and we project that actual augering may begin within a week. Due to all of the delays that have been encountered thus far and Rust's inspectors not being able to maximize their time by dou- bling up jobs, there appears to be sufficient grounds for their request. I recommend that their request for a $18,000.00 adjust- ment in their fee schedule be approved. This recommended in- creased fee should not increase our overall budget due to slight savings on some quantities in the ongoing construction,. If this request is approved it would be our intent to make a change order application to the TEPA to have this added to our low interest loan. erbert, L* Weeks HLW/eh Attachment RUSTADJU,ST/FILES/SEWERS . .............. VA I RUST Environment & Infr=ructurc Inc. 1501 Woodfield Road, Suite 200 East Schaumburg, IL 60173 Tel. (708) 605-8800 8 FAX (708) 605-8914 June 21, 1994 Mr. Herbert Weeks Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect 1700 West Central Road Mount Prospect, IL 6005f, Re- Haden Heights Sewer Improvement Project RUST Project No. 70645.100 Dear Herb. - I am respectfully requesting that our fee for the Hatlen Heights project be increased $18,000 for inspection services to install the 60" auger under Busse Road, install the 60" pipe on Lincoln Street, and complete all surface restoration. Change Order No. 5 extended our fee for this project by $30,000. This additional compensation was to cover our costs for the time period beyond the original completion date that was necessary to complete the auger under Busse Road and the extension of the contract completion date. At the time Change Order No. 5 was approved, the thinkingwas that the auger would take %.# place during the winter months with the remainder of work done in the spring. The final completion date was estimated at that time to be June 1. The additional fee in Change Order No. 5 was to cover the period from January to June 1. However, the auger was not done during the winter months, and all the remaining work that was possible to complete outside the auger area was completed this spring. Furthermore,, due to the soil conditions on Hatlen Avenue north of Michael Street installation of 160 LF of 60" RCP was transferred to Lincoln Street and is to tie into the auger work. This work cannot be done until the auger is completed. The project was staffed during January with a resident engineer, Jim Schmidt, in order to complete work started prior to winter and to finish the necessary documentation and issuance of outstanding Change Orders. The project was not staffed from the later part of January to March. Mr. Schmidt retumed to the project in early March upon notice that the contractor was to resume work. Mr. Schmidt was on site through March. Mr. Jim Picardi was on site for the month of April. At the end of April, all of the work that could be done was completed. Qualitytbrougb teamwork Mr. Herb Weeks June 22, 1994 • As previously mentioned, Change Order No. 5 provided for personnel to be on site from January through May, with all work including the auger and Lincoln Street 60 111 pipe being done during this period. However, the auger and the 60" pipe on Lincoln Street have not been done. We are estimating the construction time required to install and complete the remaining work to be as follows: Install Push and Receiving Pits 3 weeks Auger and Set Manholes 3 weeks Install Lincoln St. 60" Pipe and Manholes 2 weeks Paving and Restoration 3 weeks Using this schedule, the fee required to provide inspectional services during this work is $181,0001, calculated in the following manor: Install Push and Receiving Pits 3 weeks @ 20 hours/week 60 hours Auger and Set Manholes 46-1 3 weeks @ 40 hours/week 120 hours Install Lincoln St. 60" Pipe and Manholes 2 weeks @ 40 hours/week = 80 hours Paving and Restoration 2 weeks @ 40 hours/week = 80 hours I week @ 20 hours/week = 20 hours TOTAL HOURS = 360 hours F E E 360 hours x $50/hour = $18,9000 If you require any additional information recyardine this matter, please do not "iesitate to call me. Sincerely, George Panages, P.E. Project Manager Cc* Glen Andler') Mt. Prospect Dave Talbott, RUST Jim Picardi!, RUST Field File Central File t/l/hatfee gp Members Name Position Sheila H. Schultz William Balling Manager Buffalo Grove Peter Cummins Manager Chairman. Bd. of Directors Arlington Heights Hoffman Estates Park Ridge Palatine Barrington Inverness Prospect Heights George Van Dusen Buffalo Grove Kenilworth Rolling Meadows Vice Chairman Elk Grove Village Lincolnwood Skokie Evanston Morton Grove South Barrington William R. Balling Glencoe Mount Prospect Wheeling Chairman. Exec. Committee Glenview Niles Wilmette Palatine Winnetka C. Brooke Beal Executive Director EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ,SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES 9 Solid SO -3194 Wednesday, August 10, 1994 Waste Wheeling Township Transfer Station Agenopy 3 Providence Drive Glenview, Illinois Northem Cook Goxtnty I. Call To Order 1616 East Golf Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 Executive Committee Chairman Balling called the meeting to order at Phone 7OW96-9205 Fax 74 96-9207 835 a.m. in the Conference Room at the Wheeling Township Transfer Station. A roll call attendance was taken. Present Name Position Muni Ci Dall"i William Balling Manager Buffalo Grove Peter Cummins Manager Glencoe Gerald Hagman Manager Park Ridge Rita Mullins President Palatine Al Rigoni Manager Skokie Sheila Schultz President Wheeling C. Brooke Beall Executive Director Julian D'Esposito, Counsel Ann Tennes, Assistant Executive Director George Van Dusen, Trustee, Village of Skokie Doug Williams, Manager, Village of Winnetka V= " = Michael O'Malley Mayor Hoffman Estates RICHARD N. HENDRICKS 1537 E. EMMERSON LANE MT. PROSPECT; IL 60056 August 10, 1994 Speciai Executive Committee Minutes Page 2 H. Rolling Meadows Transfer Station 011,11, , Owl .1 Will I 19 1 IH. Wheeling Township Transfer Station 0' 0 A ,All W'w.............. August 10, 1994 Special Executive Committee Minutes Page 3 Wheeling Township Transfer Station (continued) Assistant Executive Director Tennes told the Committee that the Citizen's Advisory Committee had met as a whole the prior week. She explained that the group agreed to scale back its inspection schedule to only twice per month during August and September, rather than once each week, a direct result of the excellent operations and performance of the facility. Ms. Schultz noticed that she was sed with the lack of traffic problems with trucks entering tering and leaving the facility. IV. Northwest Cook County Balefill Project Status Mr. Beal said that Agency staff continued to review options regarding the recen %.w Section 404 Permit denial and will have documents for the Executive Committe by its August meeting for their consideration. He also stated that the Executiv Committee needs to consider rescheduling the September Board meeting as i conflicts with the observation of Yom Kippur. V. Executive Session On a motion by Ms. Schultz and a' second by Mr. Rigoni, the Committee unanimously approved adjourning to Executive Session at 8:45 a.m. public session at 11:08 a.m. After discussion, the Committee agreed to reschedule the September, 1994 Solid Waste Agency of Northern Coo"k County's Board of Directors meeting from September 14, 1994 to September 21, 1994 to avoid a conflict of observation of Yom Kippur. Mr. Beal stated that at the August 24, 1994 Executive Committee meeting, financial projections of tipping fees for the next several years will be distributed. He said that the Agency's Finance Director is involved in making certain that the 93-94 fiscal year audit was completed by the end of the month, and prior to the Executive Committee's meeting the tipping fee projections would be completed. VI. Old Business Mr. Beal then told the Committee that the Agency had a second pre -proposal meeting with the haulers who are expected to provide proposals for the Agency's solid waste collection and hauling services contract. He said that after the first August 10, 1994 Special Executive Committee Minutes Page 4 VI. Old Business (continued) meeting in early July, Agency staff had incorporated changes suggested by the haulers and a new revised Request for Proposals document had been issued. He stated that the second meeting was very short and that the contractors seemed comfortable with the changes the Agency included in the revised document. He said that the request for proposals were to be submitted to the Agency by September 12, 1994. VU. New Business - none VIII:. Adjournment On a motion by Ms. Mullins and a second by Mr. Hagman, the meeting adjourned at 11:20 a.m. Sprint/CentelwII'linois 0 Town Meeting on Tele'phone Rate Thursday, Septem'ber 1., 1994 Summary of rate changes.,,,#,,W.. page Mapo'f current untimed calling area fot Des Plaines page 2 Map of expanded untimed calling area fopage 3 List o re,, Ixel,slareas that fp f Des Plaines res,idents can call on an untimed basis under the current and expanded plans . 0 0 # 0 page -40 P rint. IV Cen tel-Minou RICHARD N. HENDRICKS 1537 E. E'."MMERSON LANE N11"'. PRosPECT, IL 600156 To I Over s last several months we have heard from you, customers, about the new rates that took effect in May. We listened to you, and we investigated. We found that some of you were affected much more than we anticipated. / 1 those, concerns we are taking these steps to turn things around: We at SprintlCentel-Iffinois are eager to make these changes, 00 which will be eyective October 3, 19946 CHICA 7#TT-112M ELGIN JOLIET . . . . . ....... .... .......... .... .... (;"6 HICAG0 & VICINITY EXCHANGE AREA, � � , �.�,.m�wre�"w"�r��wr�rm�„.. �im�^�w'� '.,�'w„wmv..rrm'•' a"�a""W - r°""ur,�nN�w�w�w��w"?�w�„nr�"^m�''^��'v��„"A o,,wh'�'.mr..�r,«mar,�'""'d'u,�r��a+"'�"m�ww�'a^ -.: �m"��n�"'ww��m rn�*';m„",h«�:.—m+'ww"„rr,.aµ*r.�.w�"��mw,,.�+'w�r�"r�W��m,rw�"www,'�^',rr�rr"�^�,w''rww':�w�'�w,m"W'w�wr^ma..+'^m�rr.mwr�r"' Des Plaines Proposed �,� min �� . .... I Ann - Extended Untimed Calling Area ^.�.'^..mnrv"rru,�a.�,r�M��°"'�.r'"'+m�"�+.mr�"��.,r""�w�w",J�aw�M"M'a.�,+a�v�'Wm�r,d"^'xrar^+"�'"'�,r�aN ✓"'�""�'�„r nn°r�'.w~,s, ,�+wa.r, 'IN'' 1111'etw, 00, ^^TMmmw.n lloin� "I 0S m'�wm Untimed Zane d TG Ca Pla - 1 o Miles 8 2 Zone ( Current date Proposedate Ameritech Zane 3 (15 Miles) /"��„/, Minutes II'tk, Zane 4(15 or Mare) � � $0050 01 �. ,i4 is i ory arrr _, a,a , r �Gl' 7,,, 7, m� W7 d''rrra r+ rom Wwuw” whu Ww'µM.wwnn�r amwau IT Nw"aM,..:r�� m""�wp, mw M"'y,. r�r r�rA�rnv�,"rr'"'��a� n�•,r: rrm,^""^w.,,�r^mn*wYw.+,��"'+ urm'.,"r�� IT 'w "'w In 'a"W a'ImrW�mma .«n-�.µ..a`,a�^ M "^*w+,^'mm°✓M�,r^"'*m'm�.m,�,m u>"k,�w'nx Ill IN w m ' �� "r.. "nrad "m m "uy m "M '\,, M"m m: mm TN, ^^ "ww ''�ry»^a„ nri 4 m '>'Iy,^ "wwm''W m r, '"Wmw'. In, �M y W , ^ � tau', „`�i rJ'a„� m' m'q'w��m!mo Mm'lym”"'yam "w� ",yyq µµ^W 1p� 1 a"a„ "' IT, 11"In"" m " w" W "' w""mw m i' m" �I, . , m ",r� in „ „^ "„ aM, °m,, wr a^.um a. 'al ",„ Mx.IN,ul „y vui,. N, mNj m w"� A ,%. SlIT, Xy m�"m, ^ �''"M, r. �`"u!r,µ "m ,� a^�M ;ro. •�, ", W na.,.m� n'W�I:.uWI m"w^,'". µ a , Mr ^ W ,y.;: "'yy w,m,,.y,�� " "M'Mq, r�, w,M '" M'W, W" m"^ "'^a�a W;,�,�. "'M �""a. m'"Wm .yo-. ++„�w,` as kill„ M "'wy „' 'aa��,,,w 'w,y'am 'a ” , m ' 11„gym ;�� `"" "" .,Wy am mu M,a. m `��;y;.� a"'a"'ym ,q a k mw�m� uh,� m' "y. a`^W wm..'m-. �"" ,�"!' d�IpM rr.0 ,, nmWua ,«. w•;"u "'"'ani, �" "'`'a'+v m'"rvm 'm��, , ;" rn„ 4�u�� °''M mym'"W M'°„� nm.xrr"�rw^i'r.„ ..?%N',a+rrww+^mrM��`w^��”m'w��^w,,m".ru'y-mA.,w"•+,,,»nh.±n� mµy � ' mem r ," " v, Mm' rr°k� a"'Wa' w "'M� arm W M, n4 W y n , Amy... W' Mm 'MN"ri Nli;µ'N r. un�r„c«weyi',wuu, �ry"4n uuuuur^NammNu, wn ummawM*Mrvm'rmr�Wu"mm"+'..w.a'me"'^^.^..m�^m'n''wr.^�R �m.� MNmtr,, 4 µWr9r `'mAv 4',y, M 4 uu ~ 9 y W� W m ey" z, mh "m„ uV" m, m ,,m ^� V„"',. w,w,u "wr '” , w�� ,�Wvw� '•m�, w wmha, "'gym Y�"^,.,, a"""�;, aH`"M�r„aa^ '"M��."+'Mm�,'w ">nr !m.,m ��r�"�orr. �w ”-.gym✓'"'=-""'+ ...,.�.a _ ,�'"'"*w r.n%°W,ro. .a i, "!m„^ n.. rM. . ";,,� ,mm"n ,aWm,n -�� '”"4,, mpam. "''"�� w ar,Mr,.ii, ` yWWnm ',w;., m, °..0„, ''h ° m,. m4,o. W. n"^,,,A''"yw "„, °w.;,^ ”°,�v^m+ ��r -• r, ,. ","rw. '",+, "", ,w M, "w o,,,;r, 'rr orw^''w�mw rrra"''t''m-,nmd' rb.,,.m ryas",”'^wmo '^^'wm'�� "gym-m,rmm� WM °wmwvamma... "erMm ,� �� , awn, �✓n r:r".x ^ ,,mm� ��n++mwww.:�wny+.r�w,..s"'"'�m�w+""'m:",wwA,.. Wwm"'Iry waM ��'"0«s„ '�w'?m. �,m n m y i mm 'Ann�« u�r.^.nµ�y ra "^.4^, m a ., "wm'.. s fm'„n m ”%�,� >r✓'t� wrawvrnMm,y�r�mrWl,�^ wm i *,,N l m'r•N•. a Wn, '" m v v ""Ik illl a I' a m m �,'m u y Vi qu. a 'M War W M W''bu v"r+, , Po ,p. r,i^, m rw� Kam®rp "m'm-„,'el�*m....,+m m�"'"w rM^M 'rdn.Mw..n.rm✓ .m.w y, n ” m a. n � ., � rm. ��, � ��„ �` + ,. ,. „ w„r swam m-,.,."'' o .,, r„ a" "'”. wM'amWm^*a+ tiff�m" w d .rr ,,,,�".. m �� w,�'. iµ. gym,. �� 'w�y',m�", "'+w y.. nnm„„� ,a"* "`""nr. aq''n�� ""'M1 4n""r �.' "",'°m ,. :i� ,"mrrr�rr,�.o'� Baru r W,.rmr.�^. - TMs. ^ ^,�q. M,aW". ,, � 4„,. �' vraH�°m"n�^, ,a4w'w� �, r"rd">u �waaxruu.��rwn '�, ,W "umuw ,.. rw �w ti„TM ^r mn'mv �, ,1 w” m;� / �� °' may. mM "miW '” aY4 I'Mau�l !W",,r� 'm* tia„,nh"Wmya(JAill— fi { /�ml „, �41"w mW m,"°^,.mm"W^ wm „�i.,! R E E ��N4NO f draff .N.M ra n puIf" I in km ;VoRT'HB 0►K ^ti;M,,Ww'Waw.,oi a"10 . mr ; �✓ u° �. r�I�”��w„ny1' f T�' ym "mGLENVIE ! fy '" ryW,in Ww,a'I im Wry,,,�w �E m�W r, m,. m m `�°'{ "',W Y''mkmsMEL N an'a^ NmyI�mq�y'r -.I �'��m my,Ini.a�a��LAINE%r«nWmµ"`rwrrw.�a"+'mr�umrr«rxn��""®'r"'^^w'S'd'' ^",+�� murI� >w'mm� m,r.ri'xh.«''"'rwm' ,r^'^'mr * yr ELKyomNu'llMa m W m° ■/�+�� (/�� ++++�N�LES SKOKIEW µa 'W W�mWGROVF.�rw n `'», w„^ w �x " . i ,NI In w^Wrr^.y,r Ire,":,M In �wn w N"'W ',W'w " v "'nw '' y, "" '' w ''��'�� A I� �,y i : "�n "a aTTI, uu ah .'.w„r,my4vWam9 m,m,aa.. '��Ip, h'wa MM;"m' m"", „ ' r j 1 �/*.�� "'" J ryM a "^^s�, ^mew* %I �Vkya �"WwW"wmIN, INI m” "',^ g Nµ,y n 4 " a '"3�a m m .uu ' ' 0# Ri D G E ;. �' � m� , i ""`a ,In" �rTIN i,� '''M.,w"�,�'�;,`�,,m" , !�mm wm"'W'm" m`"r.,vw'W„,w� ,r � � a�m� 'i^""m"^�WIN, '11, y,Ma,,.„m, n M..,N ^w„m, 'rw^ r�pna� W�� w Mw�� -- � ^ !'d'W�,(a I aa. Wm" *'w N � „.0, r.w�a*:>.m' er"M�,P iier,,Nm`""IW,,Mm'aNwm�"^m m`� m`m'w �M,"°"xim�,,, ,wm�rr"a, m,.raula ",' +u w&w,',"'�' B E N S' ENp,�. ,. u,. "".,� woW w^ 'mWu'a W^'µh"'WIn 'k"" ""S W" m'mu,� -„4" {^ "�"" �� .;rm' W, ""'a�,,,m ^ny,-N.„�� , ^ 4^ n�-.�ir ,��ry ��I�r Irv'";, ,w vWµ"m,'�'","' ;,! M ^n,,yy"Wanyrm""''p., h^,,h 4 w'^Aa'h'v.� uwWa" rer ,�� i^ „"� M,�� 4^ ;, "4u,"y"�a. �� h` m i"� "''M„ rir. �+rdr,+�uarvn,n'��rnw«-w , ,°A'" a e�w a� �y,�nll °'w:n,. w"° m""f�,r{v�a , µa f',, ny µ"wm. "syn "rer, "*w y.,R1�� ''^v^:, W'Mu, '".'� wNn fir' $5i{ ",4 '%^� �� .�,^ ^% "".hl�wR�.»� .wwHHw'rrwwy.ln ,.� ." "`M,�.In ,, " a �"M� 4 "wm n" ;;ryryi„., �,.,„� d 'wwx�w'u„ wu.r.m wwru�N ^'�ruuutw.'M'NrNmu 'M P 'tieuwmM y ` n AR' „ W mg ,� I, �a w�a, mW m rINIITT ”"w �,,,µH' ,Wm,'' m�' nw mr. � +r��M^'m,a,w" 'w"qm rut^» ,^IN e. w �� 4r.W w m � �u. °'V��.. m.. w.. �'.�. w, Sprint�,` I Centel'Proposed Unfim�ed Calling Area f For Sprint/ Centel residential customers in: Area Code: 708 Prefixes. 294, 296, 297, 298, 299, 390, 391, 635, 699, 768, 803, 824, 827 Muncipalities: Des Plaines and portions of the following areas: Elk Grove., Glenview., Mt. Prospect, Niles., Northbrook, Prospect Heights, and Rosemont AREA CQDE 312 380 Chgo-Newcastle 399 Chgo-Newcastle 462 Chgo-O'Hare 594 Chgo-Newcastle 601 Chgo O'Hare 631 Chgo-Newcastle 686 Chgo-O-'Hare 693 Chgo-Newcastle 694 Chgo-O'Hare 714 Chgo-Newcastle 741 Chgo-O'Hare 763 Chgo-Newcastle 774 Chgo-Newcastle 775 Chgo-Newcastle 792 Chgo-Newcastle 825 Chgo-O'Hare 864 Chgo-Newcastle 894 Chgo-O'Hare 992 Chgo-Newcastle AREA CODE 708 205 215 228 238 253 255 259 272 288 290 291 292 294 296 297 298 299 318 326 329 342 350 364 384 390 Northbrook Wheeling Elk Grove Bensenville Art. Heights Arl. Heights Arl. Heights Northbrook Franklin Park Elk Grove Northbrook Park Ridge Des Plaines Des Plaines Des Plaines Des Plaines Des Plaines Park Ridge nzomotailtln Skokie Art. Heights lsansamlm& Elk Grove Park Ridge Des Plaines r6 A 13 01*11 391 392 394 398 402 419 427 435 437 439 451 455 459 465 470 480 486 498 506 509 518 520 537 541 559 564 577 581 588 590 593 595 616 632 635 640 647 657 670 671 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 692 696 698 699 Des Plaines Art. Heights Arl. Heights Art. Heights Northbrook Wheeling Elk Grove Art. Heights Elk Grove Elk Grove Franklin Park Franklin Park Wheeling Wheeling Skokie Northbrook Glenview Northbrook Art. Heights Northbrook Park Ridge Wheeling Wheeling Wheeling Northbrook Northbrook Art. Heights Skokie Skokie Art. Heights Elk Grove Bensenville Bensenville Arl. Heights Des Plaines Elk Grove Skokie Glenview Arl. Heights Franklin Park Skokie Skokie Skokie Skokie Skokie Franklin Park Skokie Park Ridge Park Ridge Park Ridge Des Plaines F-11 3 It I 715 721 723 724 729 734 753 766 768 797 803 806 808 818 823 824 825 827 860 867 870 928 933 952 956 965 966 967 981 982 998 Northbrook Northbrook Park Ridge Glenview Glenview Elk Grove Northbrook Bensenville Des Plaines Arl. Heights Des Plaines Elk Grove Wheeling Art. Heights Park Ridge Des Plaines Park Ridge Des Plaines Bensenville Chgo-Newcastle Arl. Heights Franklin Park Skokie Elk Grove Elk Grove Skokie Skokie Skokie Elk Grove Skokie Glenview Prefixes current as of June 1, 1994 rIj! . ............... ------------------- - - - -- - - FL I WI Prefixes appearing in bold represent the vrolposed locations that *11 be included in the untimed calling area.