Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1246_001Next Ordinance No. 4671 Next Resolution No. 33-94 Meeting Location: Meeting Room, 1st Floor Mount Prospect Senior Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 1. CALL TO ORDER 1111. ROLL CALL VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ORDER OF BUSINESS REGULAR MEETING Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday September 20, 1994 7:30 P. M. Mayor Gerald 'Skip" Farley Trustee George Clowes Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Richard Hendricks Trustee Irvana Wilks I Ill. INVOCATION - Trustee Corcoran IV. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, September 6, 1994 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT A. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: PUBLIC WORKS B. PRESENTATION: Property Tax Rebate Program C. PRESENTATION: Vehicle Sticker Contest Award Winners D. APPOINTMENTS VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. 11. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ON MEIER ROAD This Ordinance vacates a portion of Meier Road at White Oak Drive. a (Exhibit A) 2. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE MEIER ROAD SUBDIVISION This Ordinance grants modcations relative to lot depths on lots and 9 within the Meier Road Subdivision as well as allowing the bulb of the cul de sac to be 110 feet instead of the required 120 feet. The Plan Commission recommended granting these modcations by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit B) 3. Final Plat of Subdivision for Meier Road creating a 9 -lot residential subdivisioit. B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3604 GRANTING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER This Ordinance allows 3 existing buildings located at the southeast corner of Randhurst Shopping Center to be demolished and replaced with a retail store and auto center. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-1 with one abstention. (Exhibit C) C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XI OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance increases the amount passengers may be charged by taxi cab companies licensed to do business in the Village. (Exhibit D) D. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance authorizes the sale of two vehicles at the Northwest Municipal Conference auction scheduled for October 15,'1994. (Exhibit E) E. ZBA 305 -CU -94, ZBA 30034-994, 1918 Wood 'Lane 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1918 WOOD LANE This Ordinance grants a Conditional Use to allow a detached three -car garage, and a variation to allow a driveway width of 29 feet instead of the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by votes of 7-0. (Exhibit F) F. ZBA 37-V-94, 310 W. Northwest Highway 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 310 W. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY This Ordinance grants variations to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit G) G. ZBA 40-Z-94, 105, 109, and 111 South Busse Road 1 The Petitioner is requesting the subject property be rezoned from R -X (assigned upon annexation) to R-1 (Single Family) in order to allow a 15 lot single family home subdivision. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. 2. Semar Preliminary Plat of Subdivision The Petitioner is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat of Subdivision creating 15 lots to be developed with single family homes. The Plan Commission recommended approving this preliminary plat by a vote of 6-1. H. ZBA 39-A-94, Village of Mount Prospect 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT. The Petitioner is requesting various text amendments to the Village Zoning Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit H) 1. Reconsideration: ZBA 31 -CU -94, 101 E. Rand Road This Ordinance (adopted 9/6/94) grants a Conditional Use to allow a ground -mounted antenna structure exceeding 70 feet in height. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 12-Z-94, 306 W. Rand Road The Petitioner has submitted requests for the following: 1. Rezoning of the subject property from R -X to R-1 (Single, Family Residential); 2. Development Code modifications relative to lot depth; 3. Development Code modifications relative to required public improvements; and 4. Approval of the preliminary plat of subdivision of one lot into two single family residential lots. The Zoning Board of Appeals .,,ecommended denial of these requests by a vote of 6-1. B. PC -15-94, Weinhofers Plat of Consolidation The Petitioner is requesting approval of a plat of consolidation to create a single lot of record, The Plan Commission recommended approval of this request by a vote of 9-0. C. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FLEXIBLE COMPENSATION PROGRAM (Exhibit J) 0 T VILLAGE MANAGER"S REPORT A. Bid Results: 10 Two compact four -door, sedans, 2. Two compact station wagons 3. Two snow plows "4. Three-quarter ton pick-up truck -5. Four wheel drive pick-up truck 6. Village -wide computer hardware L --",B. Consider extension of Village assisted employee computer purchase program. C. Sewer system evaluations for two drainage areas 10 See-Gwen/Milburn drainage area 2. Maple/Berkshire drainage area D. Status Report TRUSTEE COMMENTS XII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS X111. ADJOURNMENT IV. EXECUTIVE SESSION 1. Litigation 2. Property Acquisition and Disposition VELIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT IR ILLINOIS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO DATE: SEPT. 9., 1994 SUBJECT: DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT The Fire Department requests approval to dispose of two vehicles which have been determined as surplus. FI) #506 VIN: CKL169F199176 506 served the Fire Department as the Shift Commander's Command Car. In 1988 the vehicle was placed in reserve status when 509 was purchased. 506 was totally reconditioned in 1988 by shift personnel. Replacement of 506 was scheduled for this fiscal year. Over the years major corrosion of structural members of this vehicle took place. Because of the Location of the corrosion it was impossible to make repairs to this vehicle. In addition, extensive mechanical problems with the suspension, engine and transmission have developed. Earlier this year 509, the Shift Commander's vehicle, was involved in an accident that resulted in 509 being declared a total loss. 506 was returned to service. 506 proved to be very unreliable with several breakdowns involving the cooling system, transmission and steering. 506 became unsafe to operate as an emergency response vehicle. The Fire Department will not seek to replace this vehicle. On January 8, 1994 while responding to an alarm 509 was involved in an accident in the intersection of Golf and Busse Roads. The result of the accident was that 509 was declared a total loss. The vehicle sustained structural and frame damage that could not be repaired. All required reports were submitted to the police and finance departments. This vehicle has since been replaced with a Ford Club Wagon Van that was purchased through the State Purchase Plan. AINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE f BOARD OF • r ` OF MAYOR I PROSPECT Mr r September 6, 1994 CALL TO ORDER Kayor Farley called the meeting to # • r r ROLL Present i ♦roll call: Mayer Gerald "Skip" Farley Trustee George Clowes Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Richard. Hendricks Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee =rvana Wilks INVOCATION The 'Invocation was given by Trustee Clowes. O APPROVAL r fO Or MINUTES Trustee Wilks, seconded `y Trustee Hoefert moved APPROVE amended.to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the MINUTES Mayor and Board of Trustees held August 16, 1994, as Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert , Skowron , Wilks Naas: None Motion carried • 7VAL OF BILLS Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran APPROVE BILLS moved to approve the following list of bills: General M $1-1116,102 Refuse Disposal Fund 464,814 Motor li 21798 Community DevelopmentBlock . i 41f888 Water & Sewer Fund 112f014 r ►SystemRevenue Fund • Risk Management i i Vehicle Replacement Fund 51869 • Improvement • 35,,528 Downtown Redev. Const.► 41355 Police .Fire Building Const. 12f635 FloodControlConstructionM 91794 EPA • • •LoanConstruction • Street ImprovementConstruction • • • DebtService Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund low Escrow• i • 145,412 Police r..• i • Pension• 56f553 Benefit i $2,227,59• Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert,Skowron, None Page 2 - September 6. 1994 MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Farley proclaimed the week of September 18 through 24, 1994 as CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK and presented a Proclamation to Janet Hansen, Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce Director. Mayor Farley proclaimed September 13, 1994 as SAVE OUR, SENIORS (S.O.S) DAY. Skip Hart, Director of Public Education for the Mount Prospect Fire Department accepted the Proclamation. DONALD A Resolution was presented to acknowledge the WEIBEL contributions of Donald C. Weibel, Plan Commission Chairman, who is moving from the Village. Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of Resolution No. 31-94 RES. NO. A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE CONTRIBUTIONS 31-94 OF DONALD C. WEIBEL Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran', Wilks, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Farley Nays.* None Motion carried. Mayor Farley also presented Mr. Weibel with the Resolution in the form of a plaque, and a mock Plat of Annexation making Mr. Weibel's new address in Gurnee, Illinois a part of the Village. APPOINTMENTS Mayor Farley presented the following recommendation for appointments and re -appointments to various Commissions: PLAN COMMISSIO - New appointment - William (Bill) Reddy, term to expire 5/96 FINANCE COMMISSION - Reappointment Richard Bachhube'r, term to expire 5/98 FINMCE CQMISSION - New appointment Joseph M. Etchingham, term to expire 5/95 ECONQMIC DEVELOPMENT CQMISSION - New, appointments Norman Kurtz, term to expire 5/96 Bruce Gillilan, term to expire 5/96 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Mayor in the reappointments and appointments as listed above. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes,, Corcoran, Hendricks Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. COMMNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. Page 2 - September 6. 1994 pff1it-.1111 0 A 5w, P'*'BLIC HEARING PUBLIC Pursuant to proper legal notice having been published HEARING: in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald August 11, 1994, MEIER ROAD Mayor Farley called the Public Hearing to order at VACATION 8:17 PMto consider the vacation of a portion of Meier Road. There was no audience participation. Mayor Farley closed the Public Hearing at 8:22 PM* The Meier Road Final Plat of Subdivision creating a 9 -lot residential subdon was presented, along with the following ordinances : 1st reading of An Ordinance Vacating Certain Property (Unimproved Roadway) Owned by the Village of Mount Prospect 1st reading of An Ordinance Granting Modations from the Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect for Property Located within the Meier Road Subdivision 'These Ordinances will be presented for second readings at the September 20 Village Board meetinQ4. ZBA 29 -CU -94, 300, 330, 350-370 E. Kensington Road ZBA 29 -CU -94 An Ordinance was presented for first reading which 300t 330, would amend the Planned Unit Development granted in 350-370 Ordinance No. 3604 (February 4, 1986). ,,This Ordinance E. KENSINGTON would allow the removal of two existing buildings (RANDHURST) (Child World and Montgomery Wards Auto Center), and the construction of Home Depot, a home improvement retail store. There was a lengthy discuss ' ion regarding this proposal. Brian Blaesser of Rudnick & Wolfe updated the Village Board on recent meetings that ha d been held between Home Depot representatives and residents of the Kensington Commons Condominiums, which are •`Iirectly to r Of the site planned for development. Mr. Colin Alesse of 408 E. Kensington Road, President of Kensington Commons Homeowners Association, 'indicated that the Association's Board of Directors had met with representatives of Home Depot and Randhurst to review the proposed plan and discuss the Association's concerns. Mr. Alesse stated that based on commitments made by Home Depot and Randhurst the Association did not object to the development. Mr. Blaesser stated that as a result of the meeting, Randhurst and Home Depot had committed to the following conditions: mng truck deliveries to speced times, 2.Preventing extraneous light from spilling off the site, 3. Adding a landscaped berm on the east side of the building, and 4. Continuing to talk with the condominium association. Several residents of the condominiums expressed their opposon to the project. The major points of opposon by the condo residents are the ibility of increased traffic at their driveways, noise possi caused by trucks unloading, and the view of a garden center from their homes. Page 3 - September 6, 3994 0 10 An Ordinance was presented for first reading which authorizes the sale of two vehicles from the Fire Department at the October 15 auction held by the Northwest Municipal Conference. This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at the September 20 meeting. A Resolution was presented which expresses support of Illinois Superconductor in their application for Cook County Class 6b tax exemption, Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution No. 32-94 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF ILLINOIS SUPERCONDUCTOR MAKING APPLICATION FOR COOK COUNTY CLASS 6b TAX EXEMPTION Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays:' None ZBA 35 -CU -94F ZBA 36-V-94, 1918 Wood Lane The Petitioner is requesting a conditional Use to allow a detached three -car garage, and a variation to allow a driveway width of 29 feet rather than the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting both requests by votes Trustee Clo0es, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to *th c othe recommendation of the Zoning Board of ncur wi Appeals and grant a Conditional Use to allow a three car garage. Trustee Skowron, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant a variation to allow a driveway width of 29 feet rather than the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Nays: None Motion carried. Ordinances will be presented for first readings at the next regular meeting on September 20. VEHICLE AUCTION It ZBA310 W. Northwest Highway ZBA 37-V-94 The Petitioners are requesting variations to allow 310 WEST structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback NORTHWEST HWY. in order to relocate fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. K There was discussion regarding the storage of used tires and the overall appearance of the service station. The possibility of the west triangle being dedicated to the Village was also discussed, in which case the Village would landscape and maintain this portion. Mr. Ron Cox, of Palatine oil Company, and Mr. Joe Pence, operator of the station addressed several conditions which would be required. These included: Page 5 - September 6, 1994 1 - The installation, within one year,, of sidewalks and grass parkways along Central Road and Northwest Highway frontages, 2. The installation of concrete curb around the perimeter of the property to control storm water and to prevent vehicles from parking on the sidewalks, 3. The asphalt parking lot and drives shall be reconstructed and restriped, 4. The landscaping must be upgraded to the a� satisfaction of the Planning Department staff, and maintained, 5. All signage must comply with the Village Sign Code. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant a variation to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and install a new canopy. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes,, Corcoran., Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading September 20. AMEND CH.21 An Ordinance was presented for second reading which CROSS would amend Article V of Chapter 21 (Building Code) of CONNECTIONS the Village Code relative to cross connections. This proposed Ordinance covers all fees required of property owners and includes a $50.00 administration fee. After a considerable amount of discussion, a fee of $10.00 was determined to be sufficient, with a review of the program in one year at which time any revisions might be made. ORD. NOS Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved 4668 for passage of Ordinance No. 4668, as amended AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes , Corcoran., Hendricks Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. AMEND CH. 22 An Ordinance was presented for second reading which CROSS would establish cross -connection regulations pursuant CONNECTIONS a to the requirements of State agencies. ORD. NO. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for 4669 passage of Ordinance No. 4669 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 4 A OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 Upon roll call* Ayes: Clowes,, Corcoran., Hendricks Hoefert, Skowron, Wilke Nays: None Motion carried. Page 6 - September 6, 1994 An Ordinance was presented for second reading which AMEND CH. 4 increases the dollar limit for purchasing without INCREASE A14OLM competitive bids from $4,000 to $10,000. REQUIRING BID Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved ORD. NO. for passage of Ordinance No. 4670 4670 Upon roll call: Ayes: Clewes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks days►: Hendricks Motion carried. ZBA 39-A-94, Village of Mount Prospect AMEND The Petitioner is requesting various text amendments ZONING CODE to the Village Zoning Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. Because of the late hour, Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to discuss this item at the Village Board meeting on September 20, at which time it will be presented in Ordinance form. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks, Hoefert, Skowron Nays: Hendricks Motion carried. VILLAGE MANAGER' S REPORT Village Manager Michael Janonis presented bid BIDS results for various items. The following bids were received for contractual PARKWAY parkway restoration with each bidder submitting RESTORATION their costs for both regular and salt tolerant sod (bid results attached ): Bidder AnoMnt (Rectular Sod) American Landscape $2934.36 D & J Landscaping 3421.25 Koch & Son 5346.00 Kabayama Const. 5940.©0 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved AMERICAN to accept the low qualified bid submitted by American LANDSCAPE Landscape for parkway restoration of approximately 175 sites throughout the Village in an amount not to exceed $17,000. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clewes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. The following bids were received for street lighting STREET improvements on Pheasant Trail and Cottonwood Lane: LIGHTING Bidder Amount Lyon's Electric $68,286.75 Aldridge Electric 69,314.00 Contracting & Materials 70,352.50 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved LYON -IS to accept the low qualified bid submitted by Lyon's ELECTRIC Electric in an amount not to exceed $82,700 based on the Engineer's estimate for the project being $82,300.00. Page 7 - September 6, 1994 Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes,, Corcoran,, Hendricks,, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. HIGH SERVICE The following bids were received for the replacement PUMP of a high service pump at the Village pumping station at Highland and Emerson Streets: Bidder AMount Gaskill & Walton Const. $38,325.00 Tri -Con Corporation 44,375.00 A.J. Lowe & Son, Inc. 46,460.00 WALTON Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved CONSTRUCTION to accept the low qualified bid submitted by Gaskill & Walton Construction Company in an amount not to exceed $38,325.00. Clowes Upon roll call. 0 Ayes- , . Corcoran,. Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. WATER MAIN The following bids were received for the replacement REPLACEMENT of the water main on the north side of Golf Road between I -Oka Avenue and Wa-Pella Avenue: BSR AMOUNT Patnick Construction $130,240.00 John Neri Construction 131,255.00 Down Under Construction 136,150.00 Lo Verde Construction 141,711-00 Vian Construction L%1330.00 Neri Brothers Construction 172,311.75 Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete 177,.-/50-00 George W. Kennedy Construction 212r910.00 PATRICK Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved CONSTRUCTION to accept the low qualified bid submitted by Patni ck Construction, Inc. for the replacement of a water main on Golf Road between I -Oka and Wa-Pella Avenues. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes,, Corcoran, Hendricks,, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays:- None Motion carried. HOLIDAY The following proposals were received for holiday DECORATIONS decorations: L3ID AMOUNT Display Sales $34,732.55 Temple Displays 34,193.60 Folgers Flag & Decorating 33,000.00 Mr. Janonis, in concurrence with the Administration, recommended that the bidding process be waived, based on the fact that Folgera provides a contract for installation, repair, removal and storage of all decorations. The other companies' costs exceeded A Folgers' while not including any of those services. FOLDERS Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to FLAG & waive the bidding process and enter 'into a three-year DECORATING contract with Folgers Flag and Decorating for a total of $11,000,00 per year. Page 8 - September 6, 1994 Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Mr. Janonis presented a request from RUST RUST Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. to "increase ENVIRONMENTAL their construction mahagement fee for theHatlen Heights sewer project by $18,000.00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes,, Corcoran., Hendricks, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. TRU COMENTS Trustee Hendricks provided the Board with an overview SWANCC of a special meeting of the Executive Committee of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) which he attended recently. He was concerned about SWANCC's plans to keep stored waste at Wheeling Township Transfer station overnight and to extend their hours. Due to the late hour, Mayor Farley asked Trustee Hendricks to reserve his comments until the next Committee of the Whole meeting on September 13, as SWANCC will be on that agenda. ANY OTHER BUSINESS None. I I 13CUTIVE SESSION Trustee C�y orcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to EXECUTIVE go into an Executive Session for the purpose of SESSION discussing Personnel and Property Acquisition. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Hendricks, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None The Board went 'into Executive Session at 12:15 AM. Mayor Farley reconvened the meeting at 12:33 AM. RECONVENE Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley Trustee Clowes Trustee Corcoran Trustee Hendricks Trustee Hoefert Trustee Skowron Trustee Wilks Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 12:34 AM ADJOURN Velma W. Lowe Deputy Village Clerk Page 9 - September 6, 1994 CAF/ 8/8/94 8/24/94 vwl9/14/94 A on = a WIN WHEREAS, Rouse/Randhurst Shopping Center, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition to amend the Planned Unit Development, being the subject of Ordinance No. 3604, and any subsequent amendments, with respect to the Randhurst Shopping Center (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property), legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Randhurst Shopping Center Resubdivision No. 1, being a resubdivision of Lot 1 in Randhurst Center, being a subdivision of part of the southeast Quarter (1/4) of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois WHEREAS, Petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development governing Randhurst Shopping Center to allow for the removal of the existing structures located at 300, 3301 350-370 East Kensington Road (Child World and Montgomery Wards Auto Center) and allow the construction of a general retail building and auto service center; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 29 -CU -94, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of July, 1994, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal &,Topics, on the 8th day of June, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on the request to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect will be served by the granting the request being the subject of ZBA 29 -CU -94. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That Ordinance No. 3604 passed and approved February 4, 1986 is hereby amended in order to allow the removal of the existing buildings and to permit the construction of a general retail building and auto service center, as shown on the Site Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION THREE: That the amendment being the subject of this Ordinance is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Petitioner shall dedicate an additional seventeen feet (17') of right-of-way on the north half of Kensington Road (total of fifty feet of the north half) along the Randhurst frontage. The Petitioner shall prepare a plat of dedication for review and approval by the Village and successfully record said Plat of Dedication with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Randhurst Home Depot Page 2 • 3 2. The maximum building height shall not exceed forty feet (40'). 3. The maximum height for the fence around the garden center shall be fourteen feet (14') and shall be constructed of wrought iron material and the maximum fence height around the loading area shall be twelve feet (12') and shall be constructed similar materials as utilized on the building. 4. The building footprint along the Kensington Road frontage shall be staggered as indicated on the approved plan in order to provide shading and reduce the visual impact of the building mass along the roadway. 5. The nine (9) parking spaces along Kensington Road serving the Montgomery Ward Auto Center shall be relocated a minimum of ten feet (10') from the property line. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the Village Code, a final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Director of the Planning Department and all landscape material and berms shall be located on the Subject Property. 7. Petitioner shall install a traffic signal and additional turning lanes at the Kensington Road/East Drive intersection at such time that warrants are met pursuant to the standards established by the Illinois Department of Transportation. All costs associated with these improvements shall be the responsibility of the property owners. 8. Petitioner shall install a public sidewalk along the Kensington Road frontage. 9. Petitioner shall submit final engineering plans demonstrating adequate stormwater detention. All infrastructure improvements shall meet Village Code standards. 10. Petitioner shall submit plans for all signs in conjunction with this project. All signs shall comply with the regulations of the Village Code. 11. Truck deliveries to Home Depot shall be prohibited between 6:00 PM and 8:00 AM. 12. The Petitioner shall not store merchandise and/or other materials within the loading area. 13. The Petitioner shall submit a lighting plan to the Village for review and approval demonstrating that extraneous light shall not extend onto adjacent residential properties. 14. The final landscape plan shall be amended to include a 3' berm along the eastern 12' screen wall. 15. All regulations of the Village shall be met as it pertains to the demolition and construction of the buildings being the subject of this Ordinance. 16. The following variations are necessary from the Village Code: A. Section 14.704B: To allow a maximum building height of 40 feet instead of the permitted 30 feet. B. Section 14.304. D. 1.f: To allow fence height of 14 feet for the garden center 12 feet for the loading area instead of the maximum allowed 8 feet. C. Section 14.1704A To allow a corner sideyard setback of 20 feet instead of the minimum required 30 feet. andhurst Home • :wage 3 • 3 SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 11994. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma Lowe Deputy Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION September 15, 1994 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 9/01/94 through Per Attached Journal Balance 2101104 2-/15194 List of Bills Entry. 9/15/94 Goffa-LIA-Sp.mial -Revenue Fundi General Fund $ 2,626,040 $2312321631 $17455,763 $ 3,4029908 Refuse Disposal Fund {518,091) 7435,998 84,815 141,092 Motor Fuel Tax 15,807 101,992 5,573 112,226 Community Development Block Grant (33,823) 421,000 14,503 (61326) Erste Awmi g Funds Water & Sewer Fund 2,040,105 736,922 488,893 210288,134 Parking System Revenue Fund 385,398 6,068 10,604 3809,862 hInce -rnal.-Se-rvio EmnAa Risk Management Fund 112771,580 19,485 419,145 192551,920 Vehicle Replacement Fund 865,668 41 - 865,709 CARAi-projects, Capital Improvement Fund 2,944,672 595 10,803 21,9349464 Downtown Redev Const. Funds 477,394 1 41,415 435,980 Police & Fire Building Construction 192,705 103 192,808 Flood Control Construction Fund 11209,289 542 166,982 11,042,849 EPA Flood Loan Construction Fund (4,566) - 23,362 (61,928) Street Improvement Const Fund 43,988,201 53 3,902 4,9847352 Debt Service Funds 35,0199193 584,591 - 31603,784 R -u s t & A zen g Y IF u- -n-d* Flexcomp Trust Fund (767) 11,253 16,933 (63,447) Escrow Deposit Fund 7502,147 42,058. 27,935 764,270 Police Pension Fund 203,0911,459 251,036 - 2071169,495 Firemen's Pension 231,0953,817 23,543 - 231,1193,360 Benefit Trust Funds ----2-17.532 2.167 � 639.760 $63 $4s.570x912 $2.373.795 -0- $655.836-877 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS RAZIA AKHTAR RICHARD A. BROEREN STEVE BURRELL JOSE CASTRO ROXANE DIKEMAN � a 1&1 6--1111143 DOWN UNDER CONSTRUCTION, INC. JAMES T. DOWNEY FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS JOHN FRY KIMBERLY A. FUERSE H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE MARIUSZ HAUER GUSTAVO HERNANDEZ NORB HUECKER SERVICES L. G. JOHNSON STELLA KAINZ MARK KAROLICH ROSE M. KERLEE DIANE KEVELOH VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL REFUND AMBULANCE OVERPMT $50.00 $50.00 RESIDENT RE ER TAX REBATE $470.00 $470.00 COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM $44.07 $44.07 COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM $2,222.28 $2,222.28 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $.28 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $2.70 $2.98 P/ ENDING 9/15/94 $816.62 PZR ENDING 9Z15Z94 $495,546.69 PZR ENDING 9Z15Z94 $45,366.30 PZR ENDING 9Z15Z94 $1,849.47 94 PR ENDING 9Z15�-NDING $1,370.58 P YROLL PERI D 9/1/94 $455,834.41 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 9ZlZ94 $1,865.22 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 9Z1f94 $1,357.25 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 9%1294 $43,932.17 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 9/1/94 $816.62 P%R ENDING 9/08/94 $54,786.32 P R ENDING } 08 94 $14,119.18 $1,117 ,660.8 3* M CE GUARANI E RELEASE $1,088.50 $1,088.50 OVERPMT VEHICLE LICENSE $30.00 $30.Q0 AUG94 MED BENEFIT REIMS $14,349.67 AUG94 DEP CARE REIMB $2,583.12 $16,932.79* REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $.39 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $3.78 $4.17 BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 METERS $785.07 METERS $1,356,03 $2,141.10 REFUND 3 TREES $825.00 $825.00 REFUND TICKET OVERPMT $10.00 $10.00 OVERPMT VEHICLE LICENSE $52.50 $52.50 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $1.40 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $13.50 $14.90 RESIDENT RE TR TAX. REBATE $170.00 $170.00 OVERPMT VEHICLE LICENSE $105.00 $105.00 OVERPMT VEHICLE LICENSE $7.50 $7.50 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $5.40 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION CLEARING ACCOUNTS ANTHONY R. MARTINCIN C. L. MATHISON HARVEY MCCAFFERY RICHARD MEEHAN NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. G. M. NORTHRUP CONSTRUCTION NORTHWEST COVENANT PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. LOUISE PHILLIPS MARIA PRINCIPATO POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM PRIDE HEATING & A/C CO. THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT JAMES R. THOMSEN REFUND FINAL WATER BILL RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL.WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9/15Z94 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9Z15Z94 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9Z15Z94 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9Z15Z94 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 915Z94 SAVINGS BONDS P/k 9 15/54 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 411 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9ZI DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9Z1 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9Z1 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9z1 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 9Z08 DUE TO FED DEPP R 9/08 PMT INS CLAIMS_C4AWFORD OVERPMT CONTRACTOR LICENSE REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL EXPENSES REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND VEHICLE LICENSE POSTAGE METER ADV DEPOSIT MATERIAL & LABOR STA 14 BOND MONEY BOND MONEY BOND MONEY BOND MONEY RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE INVOICE AMOUNT $-56 $312.00 $-84 $8.10 $17-30 $1.79 $2.28 $103.49 $3,302.43 $62.73 $13,837.68 $118-96 $750-00 $13,822.46 $120.15 $102.62 $3j318-96 $61-95 $21123.73 $1,080.12 $20,473-82 $17-50 $78-30 $8. 1 2 $35.00 $15-08 $1.56 $52-50 $31000.00 $10,750.00 $41325.00 $4,150-00 $4,550.00 $750.00 $370.00 $5.96 $312.00 $8.94 $19-09 $2.98 $59,279.10* $17.50 $86.42 $35-00 $16-64 $52-50 $3,000.00* $10,750.00 $13,775.00* $370.00 lt VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS TIMELESS WINDOW DESIGNS DANIEL TRAPANI RHONDA VASSEL VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ANGELA M. VOLPE DAVID WYSOPAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OVERPMT LICENSE RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE REFUND DUPLICATE PMT -AMB MARY BURNS TR TO GEN FUND TR TO RISK MGMT TR TO RISK MGMT TR TO GEE FUND ER TO GEN FUND TR TO EPA FLOOD LOAN ER TO GEN FUND TR TO RISK MGMT TR TO GEN FUND TR TO RISK MGMT TR TO VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND OVERPME VEHICLE LICENSE COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM GENERAL FUND $1,401,416.29 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $3,479.95 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND $10,684.78 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $9,266.24 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $16,932.79 INVOICE AMOUNT $37.50 $528.00 $125.00 $20.00 $6,920.15 $360,390.00 $1,040.00 $785.72 $546.01 $10,684.78 $111,401.82 $86,880.00 $6,913.32 $575.00 $160,000.00 $30.00 $1,917.04 ***TOTAL** REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND WATER & SEWER FUND RISK MANAGEMENT FUND ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES BUSSE'S FLOWERS & +GIFTS FLOWERS -ARTHUR MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE ASSOC LISCHALK LUNCH-WILKS PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. EXPENSES $37.50 $528-00 $125.00 $20.00* $745,136.80 $30.00 $1,917.04 $1,978,457.09 $5,814.52 $10,750.00 $471,704.16 $20,473.82 $27,934.54 $45.00 $45-00 ( $13.00 $13.00 $34.07 $34.07 VENDOR VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. MICHAEL SIMS VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES GENERAL FUND VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION VILLAGE LETTERHEAD UNDERAGE DRINKING NOTICES REIMB-WEIBEL DINNER $378-64 PAGE 4 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $134.54 $50-10 $184.64 $101.93 $101.93 ***TOTAL** $378.64 CHICAGO TRIBUNE SECRETARIAL AD $594*00 $594.00 HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER PHYSICAL-KARIER $83.00 PHYSICAL-LOPATKA $83.00 $166-00 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE ASSOC 3 LUNCH $39.00 $39-00 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $287.76 $287.76 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. EXPENSES $29.00 $29.00* QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. VILLAGE LETTERHEAD $67.27 VILLAGE LETTERHEAD $67.27 $134.54 DAVID STRAHL ADVANCE EXPENSES-ICMA CONF $115.00 $115.00 VON BRIESEN AND PURTELLf S.C. JULY LEGAL FEES $409-00 $409-00 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $1,774.30 GENERAL FUND $1t774-30 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION AMERITECH SERVICE $2,207.30 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION $50.00 $2,257.30 AT&T 019SERV098 488$ OatICE 676.92 $$20.00 $675.92 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL NOTICE Qa RAVE VIDEO 5 TAPES $240.$5 $240240 .$5 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ***TOTAL** $3,195.07 GENERAL FUND $3,195.07 ******************************************************************************************************** FINANCE DEPARTMENT ABM, INC. IMAGING CARTRIDGE $59.00 $59.00 FAMES W. ALLEN NETWORK SUPPORT SVCS $180,00 $180.00 BT PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES $ 20.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 96.02 1 11 66 .51.05 $ DELUXE BUSINESS FORMS & SUPPL. INVOICE FORMS 6 $151 O5 G.B. OFFICE SUPPLIES, INC. TONER $59.00 $69,00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFCR ASSOC PUBLICATION $22.00 BERSHIPS $435.00 $457.00 I.B.M. CORPORATION -� BC5 MTCEMCOMPUTERS PRINTER COMPUTERS/PRINTER $198.00 ILLINOIS GMIS RAFTER C 1995 DUES $25.00 $25.00 METRO EXPRESS, INC. DELIVERY $15.95 DELIVERY $19.45 DELIVERY $23!00 $58,40 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $25 27 $25,27 PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEFT. EXPENSES $42,90 EXPENSES $11.78 EXPENSES $14.87 $69.55 QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. VILLAGE LETTERHEAD $134.54 $134.54 TRACS SEPT CONNECT FEE $50.Q0 $50.00 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $1,593.47 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $lr593.47 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS NATIONWIDE PAPERS NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE QUICK PRINT PLUSr INC. SCHWAABx INC. VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE GENERAL FUND RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LEGAL AD LEGAL AD LEGAL AD LEGAL AD LEGAL AD NEWSLETTER PAPER OFFICE SUPPLIES DELIVERIES VILLAGE LETTERHEAD STAMP & DATER $940.62 $68.22 MED CLAIMS THRU 9/9/94 $68.22 $16x367.70* $175.42 SVCS-GOMEZ $82.84 $35.00 $68.22 $462.92 $191.70 $191.70 $50.07 $50.07 $48.00 $48.00 $134.53 $134.53 $53.40 $53.40 ***TOTAL** $940.62 BROOKFIELD MED CLAIMS THRU 9/9/94 $16x367.70 $16x367.70* DR. ANDRES CORNEJO SVCS-GOMEZ $35.00 $35.00 HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER SVCS - THOMPSON $42.00 HEPATITIS VACCINE-DIX $42.00 $84.00 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SVCS -9003085322-X $352.50 SVCS -9003095565-X $251.65 SVCS -9003085446-X $280.50 $884.65 RISK RESOURCES RISK MGME SVCS $504.00 $500.00 STATE FARM INSURANCE FINAL SETTLEMENT ALL CLAIMS $893.86 $893.86 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO HOSPITAL SVCS-BRELLE $307.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9%15/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SVCS-BRELLE $1,599.00 $1,906.00 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ***TOTAL** $20,671.21 RISK. MANAGEMENT FUND $20,671.21 ******************************************************************************************************** INSPECTION SERVICES A -B -C HUMANE WILDLIFE RESCUE REMOVE HORNET NEST $105.00 $105.00 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE PERMIT FORMS $$18.00 ANIMAL 'TRAP FORMS $ $ .00 I. E. H. A. SEMINAR-KRUPA $43.90 $45.00 $$ MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS ENGRAVING CHCS 3 $3 90 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $115.59 $115.59 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. EXPENSES $40.00 EXPENSES $10.00 EXPENSES $29.00 $29.00 QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. BUSINESS CARDS -EARNEST 100.00 $29.00 THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S SVCS RENDERED $.00 SVCS RENDERED $ 50 $.00 TOPCON MIDWEST SPRAY PAINT $62.40 $62.40 $62 INSPECTION SERVICES- ***TOTAL** $1,173.75 GENERAL FUND $1,173.75 ******************************************************************************************************** POLICE DEPARTMENT AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $72.47 VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT AMERITECH COMPUTERLAND WALTER W. CRIBBINS CO. CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED JAMES CZARNECKI FIRE & POLICE REPORTER THOMAS FOLLMER GALL'S, INC.. GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES HANSEN ASSOCIATES HHI INC. ILLINOIS COALITION AGAINST TIMOTHY JANOWICK JUSTICE PLANNING & MGMT ASSOC. KALE UNIFORMS, INC. LITTLE AMERICA LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY MOBILEMEDIA NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION CNCL NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. NOVA CELLULAR PACO PARTNERS IN PRIMARY CARE, S.C. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARTS $90.38 $162.85 SERVICE $24.50 SERVICE $500.00 SERVICE $100.00 SERVICE $9.18 $633.68 DESKJET PRINTER $1,724.00 $1,724.00 MCGRUFF RULERS $247.94 $247.94 ENVELOPES $67.30 $57.30 RECRUIT TRAINING EXPENSES $266.00 $266.00 SUBSCRIPTION $168.00 $168.00 RECRUIT TRAINING EXPENSES $92.80 $92.80 1 ILLUMINATE WEDGE $24.94 $24.94 MTCE SUPPLIES $44.99 1 ALIGNMENT $44.99 $89.98 TONER $245.01 $245.01 RANGE MECE $150.00 $150.00 HANDBOOKS-DOM.VIOLENCE $11.10 $11.10 RECRUIT TRAINING EXPENSES $266.00 $266.00 REGISTER-RICHARDSON $150.00 $150.00 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $98.90 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $79.50 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $79.50 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $88.50 $345.40 JULY94 PRISONER FOOD $280.50 $280.50 SUPPLIES $47.06 SUPPLIES $47.06 SUPPLIES $47.06 SUPPLIES $47.06 SUPPLIES $20.99 $209.23 SUPPLIES $33.85 $33.85 QTRLY PAGER RENTAL $393.75 $393.75 CRAYONS $332.28 $332.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.68 $7.68 SERVICE,$500.04 $500.04 MEMBER RNEWAL-ROSCOP $35.00 $35.40 PHYSICAL-MEDRANO $329.00 $329.00 VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT ERIC E. PIEE PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL REBEL'S TROPHIES, INC. SAVE -A -PET SCHMERLER FORD INC* SHORE GALLERIES, INC. TRW CREDIT DATA DIVISION UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC. WHOLESALE TO THE INSTALLER WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO. POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL RADIO REPAIRS $640.00 $640.00 JULY 94 STRAYS $581.00 $581.00 PLAQUE-LISCHALK $96-80 $96-80 JULY 94 STRAYS $245.00 $245-00 JULY 94 CAR RENTAL $100-00 AUG94 CAR RENTAL $100.00 $200.00 AMMUNITION $310.00 $310.00 JULY94 BKGRD CK INFO $25.00 $25.00 CHEMICAL CLEAN TYPEWRITER $180-00 $180-00 MICE SUPPLIES $111-34 $111.34 RADIO REPAIRS $147.00 RADIO REPAIRS $78.00 RADIO REPAIRS $120.20 $345.20 PARTS $21.65 $21-65 REBUILT RADIATOR $95.00 RECORED RADIATOR $165.40 1 RECORD RADIATOR $165-40 $425-80 $9,949-12 ***TOTAL** $9,949.12 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. 8 HEARING PROTECTORS $91-80 $91.80 AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC. EQUIPMENT $638.97 RELIEF VALVE & TEE $104.95$743.92 AMERICAN BELL MAGNETS $344.60 $344-60 AMERITECH SERVICE $600.00 SERVICE $9.18 SERVICE$19.74 SERVICE $59.40 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. PAGE 10 $708-30 $21.26 $215.14 $897.90 $36.43 $150.80 $276.30 $48-00 $23.47 $50-00 $281.49 $65-00 $38.97 $99.60 $946.60 $16-54 $274.00 $297.75 $30-00 $233.64 $10.57 $107.75* $60.84 $79.97 SERVICE $19-98 AMOCO OIL COMPANY GASOLINE $21.26 ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC LINEN SERVICE $100.04 LINEN SERVICE $79.64 LINEN SERVICES $35.46 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. SUPPLIES $897.90 CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS 070 0241696 2 $36.43 CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC. SERVICE $150-80 W-. S. DARLEY COMPANY SUPPLIES $276.30 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE SCRATCH PADS $30.00 ENVELOPES $18-00 FIREHOUSE SUBSCRIPTION $23.47 JAMES FLORY - F.D. EXPENSES $50-00 GLOBAL FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC. 4 BOOTS $281-49 ARTHUR L. HART, JR. EXPENSES $65-00 JEMS PUBLISHING SUBSCRIPTION $38.97 KNAPP SHOES INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES $99.60 MEDICAL PRODUCTS SUPPLIES $645.75 SUPPLIES $160-00 SUPPLIES $47.85 SUPPLIES $93-00 MOBILEMEDIA SERVICE CHCS $16-54 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP - CAVELLO $190-00 SUBSCRIPTIONS $84.00 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 3 VISITS $297.75 NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE REGISTER-LIVINGSTON $30-00 NOVA CELLULAR SERVICE $233-64 PENNWELL BOOKS CHEM DATA SUPPLEMENT $10-57 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. EXPENSES $5.22 EXPENSES $42.97 EXPENSES $26.40 EXPENSES $12-62 EXPENSES $3.18 EXPENSES $17-36 QUINLAN PUBLISHING COMPANY SUBSCRIPTION $60.84 ROBERTS COMPANY, INC. SUPPLIES $79.97 PAGE 10 $708-30 $21.26 $215.14 $897.90 $36.43 $150.80 $276.30 $48-00 $23.47 $50-00 $281.49 $65-00 $38.97 $99.60 $946.60 $16-54 $274.00 $297.75 $30-00 $233.64 $10.57 $107.75* $60.84 $79.97 1* VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. SAVANT WELDING SUPPLY, INC. SETON SOUTHERN FOODSERVICE MANAGEMNT VALVOLINEr INC. VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS WAL-MART STORES, INC. PAUL C. WOJCIK FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION MEDICAL OXYGEN CYLINDERS PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE EXPENSES -HART MICE SUPPLIES REGISTER-GHAWALY FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING EXPENSES INVOICE AMOUNT $112.60 $176.45 $177.12 $568.70 $850.00 $6.19 $3.79 $5.00 $2.47 $8.61 $2.70 $12,66 $210.00 ***TOTAL** PAGE 11 $112.60 $176.45 $177.12 $568.70 $850.00 $42.42 $210.00 $8,287.93 GENERAL FUND $8,287.93 ******************************************************************************************************** HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT AMERITECH SERVICE $450.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. EXPENSES $.00 $37.85 $37 $37.85 HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $487.85 GENERAL FUND PSI ******************************************************************************************************** N VENDOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT AMERICAN SPEEDY PRINTING GENE. MACNAIR CONSTRUCTION INC. MICHAEL J. MORAN OLSEN EUCKPOINTING COMPANY REI TITLE SERVICES ULI-THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION ENVELOPES SVCS RENDERED -15 AUDREY SVCS RENDERED SVCS RENDERED SVCS RENDERED CDBG - 211 N MAIN TITLE SEARCH PUBLICATIONS $53.45 $8,406-50 $205.00 $230.00 $131.50 $1,750.00 $300.00 $75.90 ***TOTAL** $75.90 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $53.45 PAGE 12 $53.45 $8r406.50 $566.50 $1,750.00 $300.00 $75.90 $llr 1.52.35 $11,023.00 ******************************************************************************************************** STREET DIVISION AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $43.92 $43.92 AMERICAN POWER RODDING CORP. CLEANING CATCH BASINS $3,840.00 $3,840.00 AMERITECH SERVICE $500.00 $500.00 ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO. SEPT MICE $147.00 $147.00 THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY PARTS $48.69 $48.69 BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO. REPAIRS $320.00 REPAIRS $175.10 REPAIRS $90.00 $585.10 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEANING SUPPLIES $254.30 CLEANING SUPPLIES $254.29 CLEANING SUPPLIES $254.29 CLEANING SUPPLIES $254.29 CLEANING SUPPLIES $254.29 CLEANING SUPPLIES $254.29 CLEANING SUPPLIES $386.50 $1,912.25 CATCHING FLUIDPOWER PARTS $6.76 VENDOR STREET DIVISION DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY ENGINEMASTERSr INC* GARLISCH EQUIPMENT GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES HYDRONICS PIPING IL PUBLIC EMP LABOR REL ASSN CHARLES KLEHM & SON NURSERY LABELMASTER J.C. LICHT COMPANY LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC LUNDSTROM'S NURSERY MID -TOWN PETROLEUM INC. MIDWEST LUBE, INC. NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARTS $29.90 $36-66 ELEVATOR MTCE $100-00 $100.00 PARTS $8.29 $8.29 PARTS $109.29 $109.29 MTCE SUPPLIES $162.48 MTCE SUPPLIES $232-56 $395-04 HVAC MTCE CONTRACT $2,597.00 $2,597.00 REGISTER - WUCKI $75.00 $75.00* SHRUBS $534.25 $534.25 CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENT $190.00 $190-00 CREDIT $10.05 - SUPPLIES $20.55 SUPPLIES $9.75 SUPPLIES $42-65 SUPPLIES $41.21 SUPPLIES $12-50 SUPPLIES $21.50 SUPPLIES s9.45 $147-56 OFFICE SUPPLIES $78.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES $18-69 $97-03 TURF MOWING $2,031.00 TURF MOWING $147-50 $2,178-50 MTCE SUPPLIES $855.20 $855-20 MTCE SUPPLIES $74.16 $74-16 1700 W CENTRAL $312.76 $312-76 CREDIT $26.01 - PARTS $118-90 PARTS $20.90 PARTS $78-57 PARTS $126.88 PARTS $724.73 PARTS $90.46 $1,134.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES $32.74 $32.74 EXPENSES $4.00 $4.00* TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $5.80 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $4.35 VENDOR STREET DIVISION PLANT CLINIC PROSAFETY SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION CARL SARRO WALLY SCHULTZ STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC. TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY TOTAL AUTO PARTS INC. VALIQUET INC. VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC. VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS HOWARD L. WHITE & ASSOCIATES, ZARNOTH BRUSH WORDS, INC. ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCES STREET DIVISION GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9%1594 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $10.50 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $147.82 $16$.47* RED OAK SAMPLE 1671 $15.00 $15.00 SUPPLIES $45.35 $95.35 CLEAN & SVCE PARTS WASHERS $194.00 $194.00 S C SIDEWALK $96.00 $96.00 R IMB SAFETY SHOES $50.00 $50.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES $17.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES $17.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES $17.89 $53.67 MICE SUPPLIES $135.43 $135.43 PARTS $21.22 PARTS $3.31 $24.53 SHARPEN CHIPPER BLADES $34.00 SHARPEN CHIPPER BLADES $72.40 $106.40 EQUIPMENT $965.00 $965.00 FOLDERS $26.47 $26.47 TRAFFIC CONTROL $373.60 $373.60 5 SEAT TOPS $225.00 $225.00 MTCE SUPPLIES $337.40 MTCE SUPPLIES $700.00 MTCE SUPPLIES $2,130.00 MTCE SUPPLIES $125.00 $3,292.40 MTCE SUPPLIES $157.98 $157.98 ***TOTAL** $21,938.17 $21,93$.17 ******************************************************************************************************** WATER AND SEWER DIVISION AETNA TRUCK PARES PARTS $159.96 $159.96 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION AMERITECH SERVICE $18,53 SERVICE $300.Q0 SERVICE $17.35 SERVICE $62,36 $17.75 $415.99 GLEN ANDLER REIMBCEXPENSES $1,675.00 $1,675.04 AT&T 416 264 2948 441 $9.22 $9.22 THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY PARTS 389.60 $39.42 EAST JORDAN IRONWORKS MTCE SUPPLIES $789.60 FLOW -TECHNICS PUMP $2,407.95 $2x407.95 JOSEPH D. FOREMAN & CO. MECE SUPPLIES $250,25 MTCE $962.20 $1.212.45 FREDRIKSEN & SONS RECHGSCO2LIESEXTINGUISHER $17-70 $27.74 I.B.M. CORPORATION - BC5 MICE COMPUTERS/PRINTER $198.04 $19$.44 LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO. PARTS 30.83 PARTS141.4 0 $139.37 PARTS $ $311.64 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIES $17.60 SUPPLIES $43,50 SUPPLIES 6,30 $7.90 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES$32.90$108-20 LUNDSTROM'S NURSERY TURF MOWING $ 242.00 $242.04 MARSH-MCBIRNEY, INC. FLOW MONITOR UPGRADE $ 486,33 FLOW MONITOR UPGRADE 486.33 FLOW MONITOR. UPGRADE $486.33 FLOW MONITOR UPGRADE $486,33 FLOW MONITOR UPGRADE $485.98 $2x431.30 NET MIDWEST, INC. WATER SAMPLE TESTING $355.00 $355.0(1 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 117 N WAVERLY 27.41 312.75 1744 W CENTRAL $ $340.16 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL PAGE $ LEGAL PAGE $20,00 20.00 $46.00* PETTY CASH - PUBLICWORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 26.32 $26.32* POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS 562.83 . $3 PROSAFETY SUPPLIES 95.35 $ $95.3 $ 5 1 VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP. TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC. WATER PRO SUPPLIES INC. WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES WINFIELD ENGINEERS, INC. ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WATER & SEWER FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FILM PROCESSING $7.28 $7.28 WELDING SUPPLIES $15.35 $15.35 SERVICE CALL $39.00 $39.00 VALVES $3,633.86 VALVES $108.63 $3,742.49 MICE SUPPLIES $119.16 $119.16 SVCS RENDERED $1,738.00 $1,738.00 MICE SUPPLIES $90.00 $90.00 $17,189.33 ***TOTAL** $17,189.33 ******************************************************************************************************** PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C AUGUST 94 LAND LEASE $1,337.40 $1,337.40 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,337.40 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $1,337.40 ******************************************************************************************************** REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN TIPPING -FEES $79,000.00 $79,000.00 do REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $79,000.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $79,000.00 ******************************************************************************************************** CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES SVCS RENDERED $34,580.50 SVCS RENDERED $6,835.00 $41,415.50 JOHN NERI CONSTRUCTION CO.INC. STORM SEWER IMPR $156,297.65 $156,297.65 RUST ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTR. SVCS RENDERED $1,361.92 SVCS RENDERED $1,000.00 $2,361.92 SOIL & MATERIAL CONSULTANTS, I PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION $3,902.00 1994 STREET RESURFACING $5,572.50 $9,474.50 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $209,549.57 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $5,572.50 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST FUND $41,415.50 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND $3,902.00 EPA FLOOD LOAN CONST FUND $2,361.92 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND $156,297.65 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ASSOCIATED ATTRACTIONS ENT.INC 1994 PARADE FLOATS $925.00 $925.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $925.00 GENERAL FUND $925.00 ******************************************************************************************************** PENSIONS RICHARD & ADELINE BAUMSTARK JUDY BORON EMMA BRUEMMER WANDA BYRNE ASTRID E. CARLSTEDE LOUISE DEMERON ELEANOR E. DEWYER RICHARD & NANCY HENDRICKS JEWDOKHA HERPEL NORMAN & GLORIA LAGERHOLM WALTER AND WANDA MALECKI ELEANOR P. MCELROY ROBERT J. MIDKIFF GRACE L. MOST NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. CHARLES W. NICK GEORGE & TOULA PARASKEVAS RICHARD & KAREN PUMMER RICHARD & FLORENCE REITHAL RUTH L. ROLLER CAROL KLEHR SAVOY - ROBERT & JOANNE SCHLACKS HENRY E. SOBOTKA BERNARD AND MARCIA SPIES ANNE G. THOMPSON VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT RICHARD M. VINCENZO PAUL H. WATKINS ESTHER WITTE PENSIONS GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/15/94 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $75.08 $75.08 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $24.28 $24.28 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $85.51 $85.51 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $94.69 $94.69 WITHHOLDING TAXES $200.00 $200.00 SEPT 94 PENSION $1,254.25 $1,254.25 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $90.23 $90.23 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $47.41 $47.41 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $100.00 $100.00 OCTOBER MEDICAL INSURANCE $346.00 $346.00 SEPT94 PENSION $231.78 $231.78 SEPT DISABILITY BENEFIT $1,620.83 $1,620.83 PROPERTY TAX RELIEF GRANT $23.79 $23.79 ***TOTAL** $5,793.85 $3,627.02 BENEFIT TRUST #2 $2,166.83 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $2,373,794.72 DATE RUN 9/15/94 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TIME RUN 11,34.58 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING SUMMARY BY FUND 9/15/94 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $1,455,763.13 11 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $84,814.52 12 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $5,572.50 13 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $14,502.95 51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $10,803.45 55 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST FUND $41x415.50 56 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND $3,902.00 57 EPA FLOOD LOAN CONST FUND $2,361.92 59 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND $166x982.43 61 WATER SEWER FUND $488x893.49 63 ,& PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $10,503.64 fig RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $41,145.03 73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $15,932.79 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $27,934.54 77 BENEFIT TRUST #2 $2,166.83 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $2,373,794.72 PAGE 19 ID-APPBAR General 4 -e -F Ad-Sp,ecial Revenu mmh General Fund Refuse Disposal Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund EnterpristFonds Water & Sewer Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Intern Se r v I g t -Fund Risk Management Fund Vehicle Replacement Fund C":1jW.. , _P_r_Q Capital Improvement Fund Downtown Redev. Const. Funds Police & Fire Building Construction Flood Control Const. Fund EPA Flood Loan Construction Street Imprv. Const. Fund Debt Service Funds Tnust&-Auncy Fun Flexcomp Trust Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT August 1, 1994 - August 31, 1994 Fund Revenues Expenditures Fund Balance for for Balance Augi.J9H - 12L4 A!Igx3lx 12L4 -Aug, _AV2._122! $ 11612,876 $115712043 $128262487 $ 1,357,432 (3553,806) 229,512 347,732 (4743,026) 217,431 89,210 2841P017 22,624 25,460 38,183 581,032 5,511 21406, 154 682,606 582,251 2,506,509 3713,152 18v073 11,034 378P191 10544,779 258P164 285,811 1,517,132 190161,080 2,256 41,073 1,014,263 2,656, 179 199,336 499,358 2,805, 157 5531,348 1,819 3,484 551,683 1471860 748 840 147,768 11512,388 4,289 3429,620 111174,057 (404,019) - - (404,019) 59011,444 18,543 121,661 520171,326 2,587,565 4331,842 3,021$407 20,2529,797 1651,978 631,781 20,354,994 231,288,787 1631,065 561,553 23v395,299 224 .328 -1422 - 22158-3 W-4.668.80 $2,878,082 $3.930 01 $62,611M V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT GENERAL FUND AMOUNT RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE TAX REVENUE 13,139,600.00 1,078,056.69 1,997,207.46 11,142,392.54 84.80 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 2,204,000.00 124,449.90 1,432,699.19 771,300.81 34.99 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 3,013,600.00 191,039.05 744,315.55 2,269,284.45 75.30 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 416,000.00 102,070.00 115,520.00 300,480.00 72.23 FINES AND FORFEITS 319,000.00 45,943.90 112,153.24 206,846.76 64.84 OTHER REVENUE 1,1599300.00 29,483.39 1521039-23- 19,007,260.77 86.88 FUND TOTALS 2%251.500.00 1571,9042.93 4,553A.9 4,.'67 15,6974,565,33 77.51 % REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND TAX REVENUE 2,071,500.00 163,717.31 186,017.33 1,885,482.67 91.02 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 629,600.00 66,510.33 264,762.64 364,837.36 57.94 OTHER REVENUE 5,000-00 715.76- 177.13 4.,622 67 92.45 FUND TOTALS 11,24,706,41,00.00 229 511..88 45141,157.30 225,4 942.70 83.32 % MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,170,000.00 89,024.08 305,625.18 864,374.82 73.87 OTHER REVENUE 37aQ00-00 186.25 3,645.74 33j354.26-1 90.14 FUND TOTALS 1207,c 000. 00 89 210.33 3094270.92 897,9729.08 74.37 % COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 313,605.00 38,183-04 78,183.04 235,421.96 75.06 OTHER REVENUE 504000.00 .00 179492.95 1111112,4507,05 65.01 FUND TOTALS 363 605.00 3883. 01- 959675,99 2674929. 01 73.68 % CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 1973 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,500.00 .00 1,500.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE - 5,000.00 514.45 1,498.96 3,501.04 70.02 FUND TOTALS - 69500;00 514.45 2,6998,96 39501,,,,.04 53.86 % V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT CAPITAL IMPROVNENT B & I 1992A AMOUNT RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE, FUND TOTALS loo . :Ota . OO ,00 % STREET IMPROVEMENT B & 11!994A INTERFUND TRANSFERS 160,000.00 .00 .00 160,000.00 100.00 OTHER REVENUE 350.00 7.30 34.21 3'15.79 90.22 FUND TOTALS 160j2Q.00 7.300 34.21 1609315.79„ 99.97 % CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I '1974 TAX REVENUE 171,700.00 11,924.97 13,425.60 158,274.40 92.18 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5,200.00 .00 5,200.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE 64000. 00 492.64 ;1,622 23 4,377.77_ 72.96 FUND TOTALS 182 41900. 00 12 417.61 20g.247.83 162 652.17 88.92 % PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY 8&1 19878 TAX REVENUE 295,150.00 25,505.15 28,714.56 266,435.44 90.27 OTHER REVENUE J24000.00 11034, 1, 5 _3,961.67 _8,038.33........., 66.98 FUND TOTALS 307 150.00 26 539.30 ..32,676. 23 274,473.77 89.36 % POLICE & FIRE,,,BLDG B' & I; 1221A TAX REVENUE 271,750.00 21,444.61 24,143.16 247,606.84 91.11 OTHER REVENUE ? ..599: Q9.._ 573.34 11865-21 541634.79 75.13 FUND TOTALS 2799250.00 22 017.95 26 008.37 -�241463 90.68 % 19938 REFUDNG BV 91A TAX REVENUE 246,250.00 20,128.82 22,661.74 223,588.26 90.79 OTHER REVENUE 1,250.00_ 338.73 19376.43 126.43- 10.11 - FUND TOTALS 247 500.00 20 467.55 24 038.17 -223461m.83 90.28 % V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & 1 19948 TAX REVENUE 100,000.00 32,150.14 32,150.14 67,849.86 67.84 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT N�R§DgVLPffj 8 ,g 1 1. 1129N ,AMNN_l k'VgD TAX REVENUE 801000-00 80,000.00 80,000,00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE 4,000.00 211.70 665.38 3 334,62 83.36 FUND TOTALS 84,000.00 80,211.70 80,665.38 3,1,334.62 3.96 % DOWNTOWN ,REDEVL . PMT 8 & I 1'987D TAX REVENUE 70,000.00 70,000.00 70,422.75 422.75- .60 - OTHER REVENUE 6,000. 1 539.44 2.093.17 383 65.11 FUND TOTALS 76, XQ-,QQ 704539.44 72,515.92 3&484.08 4.58 % ,RQWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 119918 TAX REVENUE 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE 2,500.00 326.80 141152.90 1,347.10 53.88 FUND TOTALS 22 9 5,.Qg,,., QQ 20326.80 . .... 21,11512.90 14147.10 5.98 % ,DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 1222-0 TAX REVENUE 50,000.00 501000.00 50,000.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE 2,500.00 . ..... 250.83 914.48 _14 585.52 63.42 FUND TOTALS 52,500.00 250.83 . .... _L04,914.48 11'585.52 3.02 % DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 1199 A TAX REVENUE 200,000.00 .00 .00 200,000.00 100.00 OTHER REVENUE . .......... 5,000.00 322 37 -1 ,4,18.55 _3 581,45 71.62 FUND TOTALS 2051,9000 322.37 1,418.55 _-993,581.45 99.30 % DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & 1 19948 TAX REVENUE 100,000.00 32,150.14 32,150.14 67,849.86 67.84 V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T B U D G E T R E V E M U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 EPA FLOOD LOAN 8 & I FUND - I TAX REVENUE 400,000-00 .00 .00 400,000-00 100.00 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT DOWNTOWN RED,EVLPMT 8 A I 19940 AMOUNT RECEIVED,, RECEIVED BALANCE- BALANCE OTHER REVENUE 500 1 .00 .62 2.50 497.50,,. 99.50 FUND TOTALS o -Q 00 32 150.76 32.15.2.64 6834736- 68-00 % FLOOD COMTLO_L@ & 11991A TAX REVENUE 25,000.00 24,890-14 25,000.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE 12,M.00,-, 1,2A, 5,36 4,,632.53. ..... 7.367.47 61.39 FUND TOTALS 37' 00 26,175.90 29 4632.53, 7,3�6747 19.91 % , FI,QODC PLNTROL, 1999A TAX REVENUE 300,000.00 .00 .00 300,000-00 100.00 OTHER REVENUE 1,2,000 00 1 A 157.09 4,f478.35 J-4521.65 62.68 FUND TOTALS 312 0)00.00 119157.09 4 478.35 307J21-65 98.56 % FLOOD 91A TAX REVENUE 200,000-00 63,460.39 146,827.83 53,172.17 26.58 OTHER REVENUE 500.00 353.28. 510.59 10.59- 2.11 - FUND TOTALS 200 500.00 63,813. 67., 147 338.42 53,161.58 26.51 % FLOOD CONTROL 8 &.1 1W4A TAX REVENUE 200,000-00 .00 .00 200,000-00 100.00 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 48,500.00 .00 .00 48,500.00 100.00 OTHER REVENUE 1 , 000.00 3.27 12.65 987.35 98.73 FUND TOTALS 249 500.00 3.27 12.65 249 487.35 99.99 % EPA FLOOD LOAN 8 & I FUND - I TAX REVENUE 400,000-00 .00 .00 400,000-00 100.00 V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 SSA #2 BLACKHAWK B & I TAX REVENUE BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT �PAF �WD JL AN 81 AMOUNT _NT RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCf, OTHER REVENUE 25 9 000.00 ......... 1,9957.22 355.19 179747 75, 70.99 FUND TOTALS 425,000.±00, 1 a 95?. gg.,, 71252.25 41Z,747,75 98.29 % SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS 8 & 1 SSA #6 GEORGE ALBERT 8 & I TAX REVENUE 11,100.00 43.73- 196.85 10,903.15 98.22 OTHER REVENUE 11000,00 125.51 410.37 5§2,63- 58.96 FUND TOTALS FUND TOTALS 81.78 607.22 119492,78 94.98 % SSA #2 BLACKHAWK B & I TAX REVENUE 2,600.00 .00 3.71 2,596.29 99.85 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,800.00 .00 4,800.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE 595.00 105.60 355.19 239.81 40.30 FUND TOTALS 79995.00 105.60 59158.90 2, 836, 10 35.47 % SSA #6 GEORGE ALBERT 8 & I TAX REVENUE 36,400.00 4,723.39 5,185.44 31,214.56 85.75 OTHER REVENUE 500,00 1.57,§7-, 253.62 111,194L 3,8 49-27 FUND TOTALS 369900.,.QQ 4,781.26 5,432,1M 31.4 460.94 85.26 % gMITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 72,500.00 .00 76,894.90 4,394.90- 6.06 - OTHER REVENUE 240,600.00 1999335.76 2,836,9897.81 2,596,297.81- 79.09 - FUND TOTALS1 199,335.76 2,49,3 9 7L2,.,71 2 600, .692.7,1 830.62-% POLI gE -&FIRE BLDG CONST FUND OTHER REVENUE 14000.00 747.96 2,777.82 19777.82- 177.78 - FUND TOTALS 19000.00 747.96 2,777,82 1111177.82- 177.78-% V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T 8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT MWNjgYN RD V MT COJN$� " _ R ,Cg W12 A ' OTHER REVENUE1819,49 35 000 .00 9 .427.87 .1 25 5723 73.06 FUND TOTALS 35 Im.,00 1,819.49 91.427 25 572.13 73.06 % STREET IMPROVEMENT' CONST FUND OTHER REVENUE 117,500,00 18L542.81 73 746.75 43g753.25 37.23 FUND TOTALS 117,52g.00, 18 f 542.81 739746.75 43 753.25 37.23 % EPA FLOOD LOAN CONST FUND OTHER REVENUE 1 410 615.00 M00 486,.00 1 210 129.00 85.78 FUND TOTALS _1 410 615.00 00 200 486.00 1 It 210 9 129.00 85.78 % FLCW CONTROL CONST FUND OTHER REVENUE 30,M,,, 4,289.32 21 171.17 8,828.83 29.42 FUND TOTALS 30c000-00 4,g§_9,32 21 171,17 8 g 828.83 29.42 % ER SEER FUND TAX REVENUE 1,432,500.00 106,777.11 115,596.25 1,316,903.75 91.93 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 17,500.00 .00 1,005.00 16,495.00 94.25 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 4,738,500.00 567,013.68 1,855,431.94 2,883,068.06 60.84 OTHER REVENUE 175 000.00 89814.88 339210-31 141,789.69 81.02 FUND TOTALS 6 363 500.00 ,.......682 605 67 2,,,00,5,g 243.50.. 4 35$ 256.50 68.48 % PARKING S' STEM REVENUE,, FUND LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 2,880.00 240.00 1,200.00 1,680.00 58.33 FINES AND FORFEITS 179,000.00 16,900.20 62,598.72 116,401.28 65.02 OTHER REVENUE 10,120.00 933.04 3 932.12 6 187.88 61.14 FUND TOTALS 192 000.00 1$ 073.24 679730-84, 124 269.16 64.72 % V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S, P E C T BUDGET REVENUE SUMMARY 5/01/94 — 8/31/94 BENEFIT,TRUST 42 OTHER REVENUE 15,500.00 1.4:2,1.79 5,675.72 —91824.28— 63.38 FUND TOTALS '1, , 4,21,79 5 67 5,.,,72 119,824,18 63.38 % BUDGET CUR MO Y—T—D BUDGET PERCENT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND AMOUNT RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 794,100-00 .00 794,100.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE 1334000.00 2,1255.59 81841,01 ......"1244158.99 93.35 FUND TOTALS 927,1.00.00__ 2,255,59 $02,941,01 124,158.99 13.39 % RT§K MANAGEMENT ,FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 2,196,500.00 217,056.74 658,308.81 1,538,191.19 70.02 OTHER REVENUE 429.85Q,00 41.107.76 133,873.88 29-5.976-12 68.85 FUND TOTALS 9 9,626, M., 99 25-8 " 164 ,, 59 1 72209IL2,69 ,14834,167.31 69.83 % POLICE PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 205,000.00 13,482.67 14,534.76 190,465.24 92.90 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 17,500.00 3,500.00 17,500.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUEQ 148,,,995,,40._ 262 56_4 z 44 1 08.2 .4935 - 56 65.53 FUND TOTALS 14,875000.00 165,978.07 601,599.20 1g,273,g400.80 67.91 % FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 256,000.00 17,334.95 18,687.63 237,312.37 92.70 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 22,500.00 1,629.60 16,402.44 6,097.56 27.10 OTHER REVENUE 1&918&850.00 1449100,39 595,4.881 _17_. 1111111.4,322A,968.83 68.94 FUND TOTALS 2,1976310.00 163,064-94 630c971.24 1.566 378.76 71.28 % BENEFIT,TRUST 42 OTHER REVENUE 15,500.00 1.4:2,1.79 5,675.72 —91824.28— 63.38 FUND TOTALS '1, , 4,21,79 5 67 5,.,,72 119,824,18 63.38 % V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT LIBRARY FUND AMOUNT ............. ... RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE OTHER REVENUE 3 206,4000.00 .00 .00 3,4206,000.00 100.00 FUND TOTALS 31.2064000.00 .00 .00 342064000-00 100.00 % TOTALS ALL FUNDS 46,843,365.00 3,878,089.17 14,102,528.42 32,740,836.58 69.89 % LESS TRANSFERS 2089500.00- .00 .00 . . ..... . .......2W 5W. W ............. 100.00 % TOTAL REVENUES 46,634,865.00 3,878,089-17 14 9 10215,28, 42,, 32 532 336.58 69.75 % V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 8 U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT GENERAL FUND AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE PERSONAL SERVICES 14,099,380.00 1,008,029.19 4,052,540.64 10,046,839.36 71.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,491,650.00 334,633.11 1,808,878.82 2,682,771.18 59.72 COMMODITIES 780,160.00 65,836.63 199,270-64 580,889.36 74.45 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 528,290.00 416,501.60 454,578.98 73,711.02 13.95 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 50,000.00 .00 .00 50,000.00 100.00 PENSION EXPENSE 41000100 1, 486,03 5.944.12 -11434.055.88 87.86 FUND TOTALS 1A261486.56 6J214213.20 13,477 j ,66.80_ 67.39 % ,REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND PERSONAL SERVICES 63,095.00 4,391.44 17,285.43 45,809.57 72.60 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,419,100.00 343,340.07 897,760.95 1,521,339.05 62.88 COMMODITIES 15;000.00 .00 . ..... 9, _82 1.-94 12,178.06 81.18 FUND TOTALS 24497419 .00 5 3471731.51 917.86 -8.32 579 326.68 14 A 63.24 % MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 121,500.00 14,143.16 27,736-32 93,763.68 77.17 COMMODITIES 85,000.00 .00 .00 85,000.00 100.00 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 190001000.00 269,1874.15 7954264.61 204 6135-39 20.47 FUND TOTALS 1, 206 t 500.00 1 12844017.31 8239000.93 13831 422-07 31.78 % COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT PERSONAL SERVICES 48,480.00 3,299-87 13,301.83 35,178.17 72.56 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55,275.00 1,333.33 4,537.10 50,737.90 91.79 COMMODITIES 1,150.00 5.04 5.04 1,144.96 99.56 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2589700.00 53,393.50 72,09221-09 186,478.98 72.08 FUND TOTALS 363,605.02 58 031,74 2g4064-99 2734,540.0j 75.22 % V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR NO Y-T-D BUDGET PERCENT MINUTE" A' DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 156 800.00 00 3 488.50 _ 153 g.311. 50 97.77 FUND TOTALS 15b 800.00 00 3 488.5 153 311.50 97.77 % STREET IMPR0VEME,NT B & 11994A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 154,300.00 .00 122.09 1549177.91 99.92 FUND TOTALS 154 3001.00 00 1 g2,0' 154 177.91 99.92 % CORPORATE P'IRPwSES B &, 11974 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 220,150.00 00 1-0,015.99 2109135-00 95.45 FUND TOTALS 220 150.00 .00 10,915.00_ 2101135 1 00 95.45 % PUBLIC 'WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 335 760.00., .00 32 723.87 303 036.13 90.25 FUND TOTALS 335 7601.00 .00 32,723.87 303 036.13 90.25 % POLICE & FIRE BLDG @,& 11991A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 284 520.00 ,,00 29 510.00 255,010-00 89.62 FUND TOTALS .284 520.00 .00 111129, 510.00 255 Ll 0 -.99, 89.62 % 19938 R;FUNDNJG &I 870 9 91 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 2379775-00 .00 914.585.75 142 189.25 59.79 FUND TOTALS 237 775.00 .00 95,585.75 142,18 .?-5 59.79 % DOWNTOWN REDEVLJP°MT B & 11987C DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 7'1,1.745. 00 .00 7 872.50 63,872 50 89,02 FUND TOTALS 71,745.00 7 872,50 63,,,,,L7? , „89.02 % ,LOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 1 1 19920 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 494315.00 .,00 4,407,50 44,907.50 91.06 FUND TOTALS 491,315,00, w 44407.50 44,,IM7,,,5() 91.06 % DOWNTOWN REDEVLPNT Q & I 1993A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1244140.00 .00 47,096,00 774044.00 62.06 FUND TOTALS 1244140.00 .00 47,096.00 77 044.00 62.06 % DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1994B DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1.0200. 00 '00 244.17 11191_955z83 97.60 FUND TOTALS 10 200.00 244.17 9 ,255.83 97.60 % FLOOD CONTROL 8 & I 1991A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE505.00 175 5 194,j 760. gp.00 19 L5.00 89.98 4 j FUND TOTALS 194,760.00 .00 19 '50,"5.00 1759255.00 89.98 % FLOOD CONTROB &I 1992A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 4864255.00 .00 60 251,25 426 003.75 87.60 FUND TOTALS 4864255.00 .00 60,251,25 426,003.75 87.60 % VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT B U D G E T E X P E M D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT MY10-wim RgDgMLMT ,.j& ��, 1: �870 Aff(XJN' EXPENDS . ................ .. ..... ExegyLEP BA�LNC _g,, BALANCE DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE .00 12290.00 52 540.0081.04 FUND TOTALS 11,111,111,111-64 830.00 loo 124290.00 5245401,00 81.04 % DOWNTOWNREDEVLPMT 8 & 1 19918 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 384125.100, .00 4109L.59 34.097.50, 89.27 FUND TOTALS 389,195.00 .00 . ........ 4 4,0�97 � 5Q 34,097.50 89.27 % ,LOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 1 1 19920 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 494315.00 .,00 4,407,50 44,907.50 91.06 FUND TOTALS 491,315,00, w 44407.50 44,,IM7,,,5() 91.06 % DOWNTOWN REDEVLPNT Q & I 1993A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1244140.00 .00 47,096,00 774044.00 62.06 FUND TOTALS 1244140.00 .00 47,096.00 77 044.00 62.06 % DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1994B DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1.0200. 00 '00 244.17 11191_955z83 97.60 FUND TOTALS 10 200.00 244.17 9 ,255.83 97.60 % FLOOD CONTROL 8 & I 1991A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE505.00 175 5 194,j 760. gp.00 19 L5.00 89.98 4 j FUND TOTALS 194,760.00 .00 19 '50,"5.00 1759255.00 89.98 % FLOOD CONTROB &I 1992A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 4864255.00 .00 60 251,25 426 003.75 87.60 FUND TOTALS 4864255.00 .00 60,251,25 426,003.75 87.60 % V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT I'MS REFUNDN13, S.&J, - FLOOD 91A AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1141?30.00 .00 46 055.50 68,174.50 59.68 FUND TOTALS 114„x,.,230.00 46 055.50 68,174.50 59.68 % ELOOP CgNT&OL, B_& I IV,4A DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 47,A000-00 .00"", 122.08 464877.9?,99.74 FUND TOTALS 47 000.00 .00 122.08 4b 877.92 99.74 % EPA FLOOD, LOAN 8 & I FUND .. . . ...... DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 4219060.00 19,402,59 4011,657.,,41 95.39 FUND TOTALS 42141060. 00,,,, .00-- 19 402.59 � 401.lg7,.41 , 95.39 % SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS 8 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 224440.00 .00 3,220.00 19,220.00 85.65 FUND TOTALS ?21.440. W .00 34220-00 1,9 4 2,20. 00 85.65 % SSA #2 ,K _SLA.0 MAWK 8 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 32,175.00 19 087.50 31,087.50 96.62 FUND TOTALS 32 175.00 .00 1 087.50 31 4087.50 96.62 % SSA GEQ,LG-EZALBERT 8--4, DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE M ,975. W .00 104987.50 25,987.50 70.28 FUND TOTALS 36,975.0Q, .99 10,987.50, 25,987.50.,.. 70.28 % CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FU;ND,,,,,, CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41,000.00 7,648.56 7,889.64 33,110.36 80.75 M I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT CAPITA, j!LPROVF-MgNT FUND AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BA CE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 829,000.E . . . . . .......... . 4,1309.33 48 871.94 780,128-06 94.10 FUND TOTALS 8704,000.00 49,357.89 56261.58 . . ........ 81,3238.42 93.47 % POLICg& FIRE BLDG CONST FUND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES .00 840.00 11100.00 1,100.00- .00 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 120,6000.00 '00 540.00 112460. 00 99.55 FUND TOTALS 120,000.00 840,00 14640.00, 1.18 360.00 98.63 % DOWNTOWN R5DEVLPMT CONST FUND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 933j300-00 ....... ..... 3,484.40 3069850.67 626,449.33 67.12 FUND TOTALS 9339300.00 1111,13,411,484.40 306,850.67 626,449.33 67.12 % STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,045,000.00 12,660.77 12,660.77 3,032,339.23 99.58 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 160,000-00 .00 .00 16010-00.99 100.00 FUND TOTALS 3,205'000-00 12 660.77 121,660.77 3,19_2,1339.23 99.60 % E,E& FL2.90 WAN CONST FUND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,410,615,M .00 70,832.60 1,339282.40 94.97 FUND TOTALS 1,410,615.00 loo, -11,339.w782.40 94.97 % FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35,000.00 .00 1,480.00 33,520.00 95.77 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,550,000.00 342,620.15 717,011.15 832,988.85 53.74 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 48,500.0,0 .00 48 500.00 100.00 FUND TOTALS 1.633 500.00 342 620.15 718,491.15 915 .85 56.01 % V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES -9809825,00 4,072.56 524,322.56 4564502.44 46.54 FUND TOTALS 980,825.00 4,072.56 5241322.56 456 502.44 46.54 % RISK MANAGEMENT FUND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 124616j500.00 285,811-01 828,479.53 68.33 FUND TOTALS 2 61.6 500.O0 285, 811.01 828A479.53 147889020.47 68.33 % POLICE PENSION FUND, I . . . .. .. ....... PENSION EXPENSE 681,050,00 63 781.2? 243 720.21, 437,329.79 64.21 FUND TOTALS 681,050. 00 243,_72x.21...._ 43,,7 329.79 64.21 % BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT WATER I SEWER FUND AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE PERSONAL SERVICES 1,393,005-00 112,038.88 405,801.55 987,203.45 70.86 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,032,500.00 413,492.19 1,348,458.57 2,684,041.43 66.56 COMMODITIES 379,000.00 43,418.41 143,858.10 235,141-90 62.04 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 383,550.00 13,301.83 25,585.61 357,964.39 93.32 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 2769360-00 .00 429711.33 233 648.67 84.54 FUND TOTALS 69464,415-00 582j,25,1,....31 1 966,415.16 49497,999.84 69.58 % PARKIK . . ..... SYSTEM REVENUE FUND PERSONAL SERVICES 25,675.00 1,920.43 7,550.80 18,124.20 70.59 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 69,750.00 8,696.90 31,466.64 38,283.36 54.88 COMMODITIES 5,800.00 417.10 1,127.48 4,672.52 80.56 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES .00 .00 71 9000.00 100.00 FUND TOTALS 172 225.00 11,034.43 40 144,92 132,080. 08 76.69 % VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES -9809825,00 4,072.56 524,322.56 4564502.44 46.54 FUND TOTALS 980,825.00 4,072.56 5241322.56 456 502.44 46.54 % RISK MANAGEMENT FUND CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 124616j500.00 285,811-01 828,479.53 68.33 FUND TOTALS 2 61.6 500.O0 285, 811.01 828A479.53 147889020.47 68.33 % POLICE PENSION FUND, I . . . .. .. ....... PENSION EXPENSE 681,050,00 63 781.2? 243 720.21, 437,329.79 64.21 FUND TOTALS 681,050. 00 243,_72x.21...._ 43,,7 329.79 64.21 % V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/94 - 8/31/94 BUDGET CUR MO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND' AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE PENSION EXPENSE 677 4550. QQ, 56.553.21 g364906.81 440.6j3 65.03 FUND TOTALS 677.550.00 56 553.21 236,906.81 440&43.19 65.03 X BENEFIT TRUST #2 PENSION EXPENSE 26 000.00 21166.83 17 332.68 66.66 FUND TOTALS _26.000.00 2 166.83 8 667.32 17 332 68 66.66 % IBRARY FUND LIBRARY OPERATIONS 342069000.00 .00 r00 3 206 ,00 100.00 FUND TOTALS 3,206,000.00 .00 .00 392064000.00 100.00 % TOTAL EXPENDITURES 50.165,385.00 3 930 900.95 13 776 125.02 36,3$9.259.9$ 72.53 X VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCE DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael E. Janomis, Village Manager FROM,: David C. Jepson, Finance Director %.Ole DATE: September 16, 1994 SUBJECT: Property Tax Relief Grant Program In the current budget, the Village Board has authorized a property tax relief grant for qualified Village residents. The new program is available to owner -occupants of single-family residences whose gross household income is equal to or lower than the following: 1 Person 2 (or more) Persons $13,940 $18,860 The Village will rebate 50% of the Village's portion of the tax bill up to a maximum of $100. As of the current date, we have processed 45 applications for residents who qualify for the grant and 3 applications for those who do not qualify. The program was initiated because of a question from a current Village resident who was aware of a similar program in Lincolnshire. The Village resident is Grace Mott who will be in 1, attendance at the Village Board meeting on September 20, 1994 to receive the first grant award. Mrs. Mott's husband had been a Village of Mount Prospect Trustee from 1943 to 1951 and was a Trustee and the Mayor of Lincolnshire from about 1967 to 1978. DCJ/sm �d CAF/ 8/2/94 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN PROPERTY (UNIMPROVED ROAD AY OWNED BY THE. Y!LL6rQE QF MQQNLPRPEQ,T WHEREAS, in accordance with 65 ILCS 5111-91-1 and 65 ILCS 5/11-91-2 the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by vacating that portion of unimproved right-of-way, legally described as follows: THAT PART OF MEIER ROAD IN THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, 'BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SAID SECTION 10 AND THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 114 HAVING A BEARING OF SOUTH 0 °-00`-00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 33.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 890-14'- 07' WEST A DISTANCE OF 33.0 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0 0 -OW -0011 EAST A DISTANCE OF 74.25 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVED LINE; THENCE EASTERLYALONG A CURVED LINE CONVEX TO THE NORTH AN ARC DISTANCE OF 33.53 FEET, SAID ARC HAYING A RADIUS OF 55.00 FEET, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 33.01 FEET, SAID CHORD HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 88 °-21=43" EAST TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE NORTH 0 °-00'-00" WEST ALONG SAID FAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 73.75 FELT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. generally located approximately 570 feet north of White Oak on Meier Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the vacation of that portion of unimproved right-of-way being the subject of this Ordinance at a Public Hearing held as part of the regular meeting of the President and Board of Trustees on September 6, 1994, following legal notice of said Public Hearing having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on August 11, 1994; and WHEREAS, the unimproved right-of-way being the subject of this Ordinance shall benefit adjacent property owners; and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities have determined that the Village of Mount Prospect has no need for that portion of right-of-way being the subject of this Ordinance and that the best interests of the Village would be served by donating the vacated unimproved right-of-way to the owner of Lot 9 in the Meier Road Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect did hold a Public Hearing to consider vacating the property being the subject of this Ordinance, as shown on the Meier Road Plat of Subdivision, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION TWO. That the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have Vacation Page 2 of 2 determined that the best interests of the Village would be served by vacating the unimproved public right-of-way legally described hereinabove and that ownership of the property being the subject of this Ordinance benefit Lot 9 in the Meier Road Subdivision. gJE.04TION, THREE, That upon the passage and approval of this Ordinance by a two- thirds vote of the corporate authorities, the Village Clerkishereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with a copy of the Meier Road Plat of Subdivision indicating the vacation parcel being the subject of this Ordinance, with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds. SEC,Tl0N,E0.UR,-. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994" Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk CAF 8/22/94 "/ . . . ......... ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED 'WITHIN THE MEIER ROAD SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, Gettysburg Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has requested modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) for property commonly known as the Meier Road Subdivision (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as follows: Lots 1 through 9 in Meier Road Subdivision, being a subdivision in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois; WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested a modification from the Development Code to allow the cul de sac to have a diameter of one hundred ten feet (110% rather than the required one hundred twenty feet (120') and modifications from the Development Code to allow a reduced lot depth on the north side of Lot 7, the south side of Lot 8 and the east side of Lot 9; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission did consider the modifications from the Development Code, as set forth hereinabove, at their regular meeting held on August 3, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, and the President and Board of Trustees have determined that the best interests of the Village would be served by granting the modifications requested herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) are hereby granted to the Subject Property as follows: 1 To allow a 110 foot right-of-way diameter cul de sac, rather than the required 120 feet. 2. To allow a lot depth of 101.95 feet between Lots 7 and 8, rather than the required 120 feet. 3. To allow a lot depth of 106.75 feet along the east lot line of Lot 9. ,SECTION THREE,- Except for the modifications granted herein, all other requirements of said Development Code shall apply to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR* This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its Meier Road Modcations Page 2 of 2 passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 11994. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk CAF/ 8/8/94 8/24/94 vwl9/14/94 ORDINANCE NO. I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3604 RELATIVE TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GOVERNING RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER IN ORDER TO PERMIT HOME DEPOT AT 300 - 370 EAST KENSINGTON ROAD WHEREAS, Rouse/Randhurst Shopping Center, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition to amend the Planned Unit Development, being the subject of Ordinance No. 3604, and any subsequent amendments, with respect to the Randhurst Shopping Center (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property), legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Randhurst Shopping Center Resubdivision No. 1, being a resubdivision of Lot 1 in Randhurst Center, being a subdivision of part of the southeast Quarter (1 /4) of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois WHEREAS, Petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Planned Unit Development governing Randhurst Shopping Center to allow for the removal of the existing structures located at 300,330, 350-370 East Kensington Road (Child World and Montgomery Wards Auto Center) and allow the construction of a general retail building and auto service center; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 29 -CU -94, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of July, 1994, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount ProspectJournal & Togics on the 8th day of June, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on the request to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect will be served by the granting the request being the subject of ZBA 29 -CU -94. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION -TWO: That Ordinance No. 3604 passed and approved February 4, 1986 is hereby amended in order to allow the removal of the existing buildings and to permit the construction of a general retail building and auto service center, as shown on the Site Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION THREE: That the amendment being the subject of this Ordinance is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Petitioner shall dedicate an additional seventeen feet (17') of right-of-way on the north half of Kensington Road (total of fifty feet of the north half) along the Randhurst frontage. The Petitioner shall prepare a plat of dedication for review and approval by the Village and successfully record said Plat of Dedication with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Randhurst Home Depot Page 2 of 3 2. The maximum building height shall not exceed forty feet (40'). 3. The maximum height for the fence around the garden center shall be fourteen feet (14') and shall be constructed of wrought iron material and the maximum fence height around the loading area shall be twelve feet (12') and shall be constructed similar materials as utilized on the building. 4. The building footprint along the Kensington Road frontage shall be staggered as indicated on the approved plan in order to provide shading and reduce the visual impact of the building mass along the roadway. 5. The nine (9) parking spaces along Kensington Road serving the Montgomery Ward Auto Center shall be relocated a minimum of ten feet (10') from the property line. 6. In accordance with the requirements of the Village Code, a final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Director of the Planning Department and all landscape material and berms shall be located on the Subject Property. 7. Petitioner shall install a traffic signal and additional turning lanes at the Kensington Road/East Drive intersection at such time that warrants are met pursuant to the standards established by the Illinois Department of Transportation. All costs associated with these improvements shall be the responsibility of the property owners. 8. Petitioner shall install a public sidewalk along the Kensington -Road frontage. 9. Petitioner shall submit final engineering plans demonstrating adequate stormwater detention. All infrastructure improvements shall meet Village Code standards. 10. Petitioner shall submit plans for all signs in conjunction with this project. All signs shall comply with the regulations of the Village Code. 11. Truck deliveries to Home Depot shall be prohibited between 6:00 PM, and 8:00 AM. 12. The Petitioner shall not store merchandise and/or other materials within the loading area. 13. The Petitioner shall submit a lighting plan to the Village for review and approval demonstrating that extraneous light shall not extend onto adjacent residential properties. 14. The final landscape plan shall be amended to include a 3' berm along the eastern 12' screen wall. 15. All regulations of the Village shall be met as it pertains to the demolition and construction of the buildings being the subject of this Ordinance. 16. The following variations are necessary from the Village Code: A. Section 14.70413: To allow a maximum building height of 40 feet instead of the permitted 30 feet. B. Section 14.304.D.1.f: To allow fence height of 14 feet for the garden center 12 feet for the loading area instead of the maximum allowed 8 feet. C. Section 14.1704A To allow a corner sideyard setback of 20 feet instead of the minimum required 30 feet. dhurst Home Depol "'age 3'Of 3 SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994. Gerald L. Farley Village President F"AMM-Go" Velma Lowe Deputy Village Clerk *11age0f M0, rospect Mount Prospect, Illinois lot INTEROFFICE MEMOINlaka RANDUM To: Mike Janonis, Village manager From: Cathleen. Freels, Administrative Intern Dat -e: September 24, 1994 CC: Dave Strahl, Assistant to the Village Manager Re: V.-L1.1age Taxi Cab Deregulation One con,-=rr. the board had was what woll" d happen to 4L -.h se r Citizen's Taxi program if cab fares were derem.-I'Laced . I Spnl-a at length to Des Plaines., Wheeling and Palatine concern -1. 1.1 q t I Senior Citizen's Cab Fare discount. I chose these communitir--s because they do not, regulate cab fares, yet they maintain a senior's discount program. Palatine Township provides senior busing, two ten -passenger minivans, which are subsidized by Pace. Palatine als'o provides Taxi Cab vouchers, which the seniors can use with either American or 303, the two cab companies servicing Palatine. The cab discount is $1.50 per one-way ride up to 10 ride per month. The bus fare is $1.25 per one-way. Most seniors use the bus service. The Village of Wheeling provides a $2.00 discount per one-way cab ride for a total of 8 one-way rides per month. American Taxi is the only cab company that Wheeling reimburses for the discount. Wheeling's program is similar to our own in that the cab company has to keep track of each ride and then submit a request for reimbursement. The City of Des Plaines' seniors pay $1.75 per one-way cab ride within the City limits. Vana cab is the only cab company which Des Plaines uses for their senior's program. Instead of accounting for every ride that was given a senior's discount, Des Plaines pays Tana a yearly fund depending on how much money is available in the budget. Not one of the communities questioned said there were any significant complaints against the cab companies regarding the senior's program. All three communities, like Mt. Prospect, use senior I.D. cards. I have attached copies of code sections concerning Taxicab Rate Schedules for Des Plaines, Wheeling, and Palatine. These A communities require that cab companies submit a schedule of their 10 Page Two Memo : TaxiCab Deregulation September 16, 1994 fees and that the companies notify them any increases. They do not, however, require approval, for these increases. This code language could be used if Mt. Prospect decides to pursue this alternative to cab fare regulations. These ordinances are available in their entirety if you would like them. Finally, on September 2, 1994 the Northwest Municipal Conference distributed a survey on Taxicab Fares per municipality. Attached is a copy of that summary. The backup documents to this report are available if you would like them. Please let me know if there is anything else that I can do at this time. ''I'll, . .. . . .......... .... . . ..... .... SEP -09-1994 13:00 FROM CITY OF DES PLAINES IL TO 92969207 P,© 5-5-25 5-5-25 (8) Three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00)) per accident for bodily injuries; (C) Ten thousand dollars (310.000.00) for Property damage. Each pervon conducting the business of hackman. cabman. Or Of OPeM!ng a Public PsUaMW vehicle for hire, withirt, the City small, on or before the fift day of each month hereafter. present to the Comptroller has certificate Showing insurame carried 'thereon 'in con*ier4t with the fOr"Oing PrOvi:siorts of this ChaPter�. ars the �Cornp- troller shall adtnOwltd9tWeSentationof the tertiflute by writing thedate a h I nd , is initials upon the certificate. Failure to present the propef insurance certificate shall cOnstims A violation Of this Chapter and shall be grounds for immediate revocation Of licerms issued for the operation Of Public passenger vehicles within the City. 5-5-25.a Cab Stands: No vehicle of any kind shall stand upon, be parked upon, Or Make use Of any Public taxi or hack stwd in, this City unless the 0*1*'r th'"" f' has' obtained 8 WOMW as provided hemin, and the d * r thereof has a chauffeur's lkeftfta$ provid*dfor in %q4-ction 5.5,_25., rl 1 of piste. J 5-5-25.9 'COMPtr011ees Regitter., It shall be the duty of the Comptroller to kwp a register of the rwmes of persons to whom licenses are onnted or transferred, the dam when iaued or transferred, the numbers Of the licenses, and the descriptions of the vehicles licensed. 5--5-25.10 Name and Number of Vehicle: Each vehicle licensed as aforesaid "I bear, on the outside 'thereof, in 8 cortsPicuous place, the name of the awrm Vwreof in letters not lea than two inches (2,"') in height, properly propor= tinned and legible. Every vehicle shall, in addition to the mama, bear a number on the ouuWe thereof in a cormpkuous place. (Ord.M-3847. 1-15-68) 6-6-2&11; RATE OF FARES: Each cab company authorized to operate within V* 'City shall 9WO to the City Comptroller or his agent, in writing, 'thirty (30) do," prior to change in fare, an updated schedule of fare changers This schedule of fare cttarips shall also be published in a newspaper of gertwal No nvtw or other mea wring device shall be pulled or the mechar&.rn thereof started until all Patrons; have enured the vehicle. All rartes of fare shall be posted in sat m at low Immfourda inch (3/4') in size in legible form in such manner as to be vi*ble from th* rear seat of the vehicle. A schedfu[* shall also be pgste de0natiom (Ord. M-66-61, MHU showing the rwws of fare for out of town 166,*68; 174.-4 79:380 :1181 SEP -09-1994 13:01 FROM CITY OF DES PLAINES IL TO 9296920? P. 05 5-5-25 5-5-25 A schedule shall also be posted showing the rates of fare for out of town destinations where the additional twenty percent (20%) charge over that shown on the meter is applicable. 6-6-25.12: disputes Over Fare; Receipt: All disputes as to prices or distances shall be smied by the Chief of Police or other membra of the police force most convenient to the site of the dispute. Upon request of any passenger, the driver of the vehicle shall give the persons so reqwating a receipt for the amount of fare demanded and paid. (Ord. S-5-25.13: penalty For Overcharge: The owner or driver of any vehicle, licensed as aforesaid, who may have demanded and received any fare in excess of what is provided in this Chapair, shall return the excess received and, in addition, be liable to a penalty of twenty five dollars ($25.00) and to the revocation of his chauffeur's license. (Ord. M.-21-68, 6.10-68) 6-5-25.14-. Advance Payment: Every owner or driver shall hime the right to demand his fare of the person so employing him on entering his vehicle, and may refuse to convey any person who shall not comply with the demand. (Ord. M-3&67, 1.1"8) 5-5-2�35: Refusal To CarryPassenger: No owner or driver of any vehicle, licensed under this Chapter, shall refuse w convey in this City any person with or without bag" when applied to for that purpose; or, having undertaken to convey the person, shall fail or neglect to do so, under a penalty of twenty five dollars ($25.(0) for each offense. (Ord. W21.68, 6-1"8) S-5-25.16.- Multiple Fares: No person or owner having ted employment from any person Mail while the person having employed him is in his vehicle amt or solicit any other person as a pa=enger except at the request and direction of the person who shall already have employed him. 5-6-25.17: Parking On Streets: No person in charge of any public taxi* or vehicle carrying passengers for him shall permit the same, except when receiving or discharging passengers or when instructed by their passengers so to do, to stand on any of the streets, avenues or alleys in this City for any I*mpr than five (5) minutes, except as otherwise herein provided. No vehicles. licensed as aforesaid, shall be permitted to use any of the public suee of the City as a station or wind for the carrying on of business, provided. hovwwer, (fiw the motor vehicle or other vehic4es may be stationed on the privm drivewa'ys of any railroad company in a suitable manner so as not to impede or block traffic for a period of w t 0) minutes before and five (5) minutes after the arrival of passenger trains at the depot of dw railway company; and provided further, that interurban autobuses may be parked at m4sonable placed designated by the Mayor and Council, so as not to impede or block traffic for a period not exceeding fifteen (15) minutes, to receive and discharge passengers. 186,f6$-1 74,-479:380 SEP -12--' 94 MON 09: 72 1 D: U I LLAGE CF WHEEL I NG TEL NC: 1-706-459-91632 9924 P@7 TAXICABS AND LIVERY VEHICLES 4.72.18&--4.7=00 or livery vehicle Issued by an Insurance company licensed to do business in the state of Illinois and to be approved by the village, ensuring that all final Judgment$ recovered against such licensee,, or such drivcr, for any property d=age resultmig from the negligence of such licensee,, his or Its agents, or of such driver,, in the operation of such taxicab to the extent of twenty-five thousand dollars for each accident will be paid. Each such duplicate policy or certificate of insurance herein required shall provide for payment and satisfaction of any final judgment rendered as afore. said and shall provide that suit may be brought In any court of competent Jurisdiction upon such Insurance policy by the owner of any such judgment, shall contain a description of each motor vehicle covered thereby, giving the manufacturer's description of each motor vehicle covered thereby, giving the manufacturer's name and number and state license number, and shall also provide that such Insurance policy c=ot be canceled by the company issuing the same without giving ten days" notice In writing of such cancellation to the village either personally or by registered mail. The IICCMC shall at All times maintain the full Insurance coverage hereinabove required. and whenever the obligation provided for in such bond or policy shall cease or be determined. then the license issued for the operator of such taxicab shall also cease to be in effect and force. At any time in the judgment of the village such policies or certificates of insurance are not sufficient for any good cause, It may require replacement thereof with other good and sufficient policies or certificates of insurance in accordance with the provisions of this section. (Ord. 2066 § A (part). 1984). 4.72.180 Reasonably 52te and adequate service required. Each owner, and licensee Is required to furnish 31fe and adequate service at just and reason- able rates within the village as may be required to assure adequate accommoda- tions to the public in accordance with the provisions provided for in this Chapter. (Ord. 2066 1 A (part). 1984). 4.72.190 Rate schedule to be flied with village. (a) Every person, firm or corporation which is licensed to operate a taxicab or taxicabs in the village shall establish a schedule of its fares and shall cause a true and correct copy thereof to be flied with the village within ten days after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Chapter. Any person, nrm or corporation which shall hereafter apply for a public vehicle license shall file a schedule of its proposed fares with such application. In the event of any Increase In such schedule of fares. or any part thereof. such person. flim or corporation shall rile a notice thereof with the village at least thirty days prior to such effective date of the increase. (Ord. 2697 J A. 1" 1: Ord. 2066 1 A (part), 1984). 4.72.200 Posting of rates. The rates of fare charged by any taxicab licensed to operate in the village shall be prominently shown. exhibited and 85 1whecu"I 10-91) Section 11-459. Taxicab Rates. Every person, firm or corporation which is licensed to operate a taxicab or taxicabs in the village shall establish a schedule of its fares and shall cause a true and correct copy thereof t be filed with the village. Any person, firm or corporation which shall hereafter apply for a public passenger vehicle license shall file a schedule of its proposed fares with such application. In the event of any increase in such schedule of farest or any part thereof, such person, firm or corporation shall file a notice thereof with the village at least thirty days prior to the effective date of the said,_ increase. Section 11-460. Uniform Rates Throughout the Day. Any rate schedule filed with the village shall provide that the fares charged shall be uniform throughout all 24 hours of each day. f , ,.fit Sec. 11461. Same—What deemed "waiting time." "Waiting time" shall include the time when the taxicab Is not In motion, beginning with the arrival at the place to which It has been called, or the time consumed while standing s direction. of the passenger, but no charire s at the time lot on account of$ ineffl itaxicab, hall be ads for c encY of the taxi - b, or its op- erator, or time consumed by a premature response to a call. (Ord. No. 0-20-76, § 1t 3-8-76 Ord. No. "11-7901 6-29-79) Sec. 11-462. Same -.Pasting of rates. - There shall be affixed on the Inside of each taxicab in a conspicuous place and in such a manner that It may be con- veniently and easily read by any person riding therein, a card upon which shall be printed in plain, , legible type the rates of the faxe of the taxicab. icab. (Ord. No. 0.20-70, § 1 3-8-76 • Ord. No. 08-79 § 11, 5--78 Sec. 11-463. Same--Recelpt. Any taxicab passenger paying a fare shall, upon request, be given a recelpt Indicating the amount mid. (Ord. No. 0-20-76, It 34-76 Ord. No. 0-58-791 I It 5-29-79) Sec. 11-4$4. Right of operator to demand fare in advance • refusal to convey pasee 1 The operator or person in charge or control of any taxicab may demand, In advance, the payment of the fare of theper- son desiring to be carried by such taxicab, and may refuse tO convey any person who shall not comply with the demand but no driver or operator of a taxicab shall otherwise refuse or neglect to convey any orderly person, upon request, any - ere in the village, unless previously engaged or unable to do $0. (Ord. No. 0-20-76t 1 3-8-76; Ord. No. 0-68-79, § 1, 6-29-70) NINMC GIC SURVEY SEPTEMBER, 1994 (VOTES: ' Buffalo Grove has no taxi companies within its borders Des Flames: See attached Highland Park: Additional passenger--- $ .50 Lincolnshire—No regulations, just license and statement of fare rate Palatine—No regulations Prospect Heights, -Offers senior cifizenldisabled taxicab subsidy program. Under it, the Cl pays 112 the Forms available at City Hall. After completion of form the resident is issued an ID card. � P Y fare up to a max payment of $3 per ride. Rolling Meadows* what City ordinances and records show as last approval in 1988. loping Meadows*=what American T says they are charging in Rolling Meadows. We are trying Roselle: Do n't regulation t cab fares ry g to straighten out the discrepancy. Streamwood: Does not legislate or monitor Niles: For each add1l. person, 12 yrs or more, $1.00. For each 1110 mile or fraction thereof, $ .13 8/15/94caf 9/01/94vwl AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XI OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 11.1134 entitled "Schedule of Established Rates of Fares and Charges" of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 11.1134 shall be and read as follows: sec. 11.1134. Schedule of Established Rates of Fare and Charges. No owner or driver of a taxicab shall charge a greater sum for the use of a taxicab than in accordance with the following rates: A. Two dollars ($2.00) for any distance less than one mile for one passenger. B. Two dollars fifty cents ($2.50) for the first mile for one passenger. C. Twenty cents ($0.20) for each additional one-eighth (1/8) mile or fraction thereof over and above the first mile for one passenger. D. Ten cents ($0.10) for each twenty (20) seconds waiting time or traffic delay. E. Ten cents ($0.10) for each additional passenger above the age of twelve (12) years for the entire trip. F. Twenty-five cents ($0 ..25) service charge is added to the above rates for parcel delivery and the handling of all items other than normal luggage. G. Fifty cents ($0.50) service charge is added to the above rates for all trips which do not originate or terminate within the Village. H. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained herein, an owner of a taxicab may establish flat rates for trips which originate within the Village with a destination point outside of the Village or trips which originate outside the Village with a destination point within the Village. Any such flat rates established shall be filed with the Village Clerk. " SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: ABSENT, PASSED and APPROVED this day of .,$ 1994. Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe, Deputy Village Clerk 1918 Wood Lane Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 September 14, 1994 Mr. Ray P. Forsythe Village of Mount Prospect 100 Smith Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 X= FIRMA, "�_Jyotl At the Village Board Meeting on September 6, 1994 our requests for a Conditional Use for a three -car detached garage and a Variation for the driveway width (ZBA 35 -CU -94 and ZBA 36-V-94) were approved by the Village Board as an ordinance with the first reading of this ordinance to be on September 20, 1994. Since there was no opposition to our request and it was approved into ordinance form by a vote of 7-0, we would like to request that the first reading of this matter be waived so that the final reading will be at the Board meeting of September 20. If there are any questions or problems, feel free to give me a call at home at 708-390-8439 or at work at 708-391-7889'. Thank you for helping us through this process. Sincerely, Keith Russotto cc: Gerald L. Farley, Mayor Sqofm -AvtA0AU.P 100J 6Z 'BAAOflv 01 UOTIVUBA 19 qjLM a2ung no-oajql r mollp of as fl leumlMuoo v joj isanbai aqj JO FAojddv spuawwoow slv;DddV jo Pn0a SUTUOZ aqj O -L JO 010A V Ag -jsanbw aqj possnosip Ap-jauag slvaddV jo pmog SumoZ oql -1,10112uMA 2ljjsajinbajAVM0AUp cap jo uotliod ecus v Aluo ivip os sjadvi it pur aReng 04101 SSQ3318 UMS 01 AIMWOU ST qjpFA ALMOALIP o,ql pOIRIS -laqllnJ aH -%5j7 pamolpe wnummw aqj ju si atemoo iol aqi pie a&ng lm!dk4 E S-0 poalsap slawlens all, 18141 POTBOTPU! OH odaiis aqj pazinurms ".iautmlj 4a4jAsioq Ava 0 1 'I' ap -swal! area UMVI ptm luotudinbo uoi61M.1 30.1 SV UOM SP S0131 qOA Iruouad 31.md ol polsonbai si 0 aqj jrqj pairotpui onossn-d -jW -mnboi oqj poluasaid ouossn-d po)j -.rye "Augam atp IV *V661 '5Z ISTIBTIV JO Supopw slwddV jo pnog SuruoZmjnSai aqi it) pamomai sem Isanbai aU *IOQJ 6Z JO qlP!m uunwm.tu t, lqlm Aiammup v pur a!3vmg no-aajqi paqoviapr lorulsuoo 01 Suqaas an slimoildde aqj 'AlreoUpadS 'Otm-I POOAA, 8161 IE U01JELIVAP qlyAoSfl JR110111PUOD -e IOJ isonbai v uo uoiiepowwoow jiaql uoquap!sum inoft jqj sl!tustmil slvoddv jo pnos sumoZ 2q.L OiAossflu T)Aor C[MV RMN 't6-A-9f-VIIZ 't6-fl3-Sf-VffZ :1321irEns V66T "Of JLS11f)f1V :3LLVG DMNKVrla J0 H0JLJ3Ma "W "NaNO03 T WVlrlllAt :INOHA Ilaf)VKVW aDVIrHA 'SINONVf "a rIaVH31W *OJL mouiUl 1padswa junoW wvaa(i ommxvria 133dS02id INA0W30 3f)VrlrllA P/�/r ac- Soeuey �uJ,-'5p77D/Kelr# Ile wvt,46 Lyllologim MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-35-CU-94 and Hearing Date: August 25, 1994 ZBA-36-V-94 PETITIONER: Keith and Joyce Russotto SUBJECT PROPERTY 1918 Wood Lane PUBLICATION DATE: August 10, 1994 (Journal) REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use as required in Section 14.903.A.8 to allow a detached three -car garage,; and a variation to Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 29 feet instead of the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. MEMBERS PRESENT Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxern Jack Verhasselt ABSENT: None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced case ZBA-350CU-94 and case ZBA-36-V-94 being a request for a Conditional Use as required in Section 14.903,A.8 to allow a detached three -car garage; and a variation to Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 29 feet instead of the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. Mr. Keith Russotto introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Russotto stated that he would like to build a 3 car garage to store his snowmobile trailer and a small watercraft. He stated that currently the trailer is parked on the side of the house and feels it would enhance the neighborhood if stored inside. Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Forsythe stated that the Zoning Ordinance allows attached three -car garages and ZBA-35-CU-94 and ZBA-36-V-94 Page 2 detached three -car garages only with a conditional use permit. The proposed garage is 682 square feet with the dimensions of 22'x 31'. The garage is designed as a typical three -car garage with 3 doors with a driveway to match the doors. There is a shed on the existing property which will be required to be removed by adding the three car garage. Mr Forsythe finther noted that the existing front yard lot coverage is 37% which exceeds the permitted front yard coverage. The proposal will reduce the front yard lot coverage to 27%. Chairman Basnik asked Mr. Forsythe if the garage will have 3 doors. Mr. Forsythe stated that the garage will have a double door and a single door. Mr. Cassidy asked staff about the current garage that is attached to the house. Mr. Forsythe stated that the garage which is attached to the house will have to be coverted to living space in order to allow the three car garage. Also, Mr. Forsythe stated that the drive will be on the lot line and that it must be pitched toward the petitioners yard for storm water drainage. Mr. Brettrager stated that there should be a stipulation with the request that the shed be required to be removed from the property. Mr. Brettrager then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a Conditional Use as required in Section 14.903.A.8 to allow a detached three -car garage as shown on petitioners exhibit I subject to petitioners removal of the shed on the existing lot. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy. Upon Roll Call- AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Cassidy, Floros, Lannon, Luxem, Verhasselt NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Mr. Brettrager then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation to Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 29 feet instead of the maximum allowed 22.75 feet as shown on petitioners exhibit 1. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Cassidy, Floros, Lannon, Luxem, Verhasselt NAYS- None The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Res,pectfutilly submitt,ed,, ulie Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK9 CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER�'Aj DATE: AUGUST 16, 1994 CASE NO.: ZBA-35-CU-94t ZBA-36-V-94 APPLICANT: KEITH AND JOYCE RUSSOTTO ADDRESS: 1918 WOOD LANE LOCATION MAP: C"w INC0of"Lo 00 14,31 01 em 4a 1932 1428 1429 0 1p� 1426 1427 0 1424 WOOO L" 1418 0 0 — wl --1,41 0— 1416 01 1 0% CM j low (M ft— *� I 1414 3 1415' 1416 1417 1416 1417 1416 —:w 1412 1473 1414 1415, 1414 600--, 1415 1-4141 L 1410 1,411 1412 :2 1413 1, 1412 2 1413 412 1412 1408 1 1410 1 4=1 1 _I 410 e I eeeee 4 eeeee 1 ee— 1 1410 r 14-06 1 14 1408 07 1409 1408 4C 1409 14-08 14-041405 1406 1407 14061 wwwmmw� 1407 1406 1 140.3 1404 1405 1 4C4 1405 140 . .. .. .. .. .......... t 140 1402 1403, 1402 1403 140', - 1400, 14011400, L r 1401 140 TANO LN ow wft w om 4_ CN PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 9,295 sq. ft. %COVERAGE: Current: 32%; Proposed: 45% Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 Thepetitioner is requesting a Conditional Use as required in Section 14.903 - A. 8 to allow a detached three-cargarage; and a variation to Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 29 feet instead of the maximum allowed 22.75 feet. AND!QQ.NC'EM, P. .... . or the n i ed that the garage is to be used f cants have cat Sum,mary of Application: The ap pfiidi i storage of automobiles as well other recreational equipment and lawn care items. impact on Surrounding Properti"es: The petitioners are requesting to convert, the existing garage ' to living ving space and construct a detached three -car garage to the, rem of their lot. The Zo * rung Ordinance allows attached three -car garages as a permitted use and detached three -oar garages only with a conditional use. Theproposed garage is 682 square feet with the dimensions of 22'x 31'. The garage is designed as a typical three -car garage. The structure meets all, required setbacks and lot coverage is at the ace will be maximum allowed 45%. Staff would note that no further additions to impervious surf permitted without further variations. n1i �20 f6et. The The proposed dfiveway is, 29 feet, "in width at the: garage door ope, ng and tapers to, he garage, is Zoning Ordinance regulates driveway, Vaidths by front yard lot coverage,. Because t detached and at the rear of the property the, maximum width pernuitted, is 22.75 feet., 'The, existing Ott front and lot coverage is 37% which is abow the currenuttedfront tly pe fr yard lot covers ge. The,, proposed, front yard lot coverage is 27%. This, is a result of the removal of the existing driveway and sidewalk. Engineering has indicated that the petitioner will be required to submit a grading plan for the new garage with the building permit. V, J Thepetitioner is seeking a conditional use and variation in order to construct a three -car garage with the n driveway,, 'The proposed, garage meets all required setbacks and the total lot coverage an req�uirement has met. met. Staff has, no objection to the conditions! use . The requested v *anoni's needed to gain access to the garage. The petitioner has tapered the driveway so that there is not an ,excessive amount of pavement. St has no objection to the variation request. 1 1964 a W 11 CAF/ 9/12/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1918 WOOD LANE WHEREAS., Keith and Joyce Russotto (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation and Conditional Use as provided in Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 1918 Wood Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 66 Woodview Manor Unit Number 1 being a Subdivision in the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 42, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded June 16, 1960 as Document Number 17883769 in Cook County, Illinois WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a Conditional Use permit, as provided in Section 14.903.A.8 , to allow a detached garage designed to house more than two vehicles and a variation from Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of twenty-nine feet (29'),, rather than the permitted 22.75 feet; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the Conditional Use and variation requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 35 -CU -94 and ZBA No. 36-V-94, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of August, 1994, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Journal on the 10th day of August, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations requested and have determined that it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prosp t hereby grant to the Subject Property a Conditional Use permit to allow a detached garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles and a variation from Section 14.2215.A.3 to allow a driveway width of twenty-nine feet (291)at the garage entrance, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. SECTION THREE,- Except for the Conditional Use and variation granted herein,, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. 0 ZBA 35 -CU -94 ZBA 36-V-94 SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES** NAYS: ABSENT: &ASSED and APPROVED this •.. og Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe DeputyVillage Clerk MHU16" PST 414co" SUAVE 111 . livi, WOUIVEM, ql!A*i aourpi000r ui pacluisai pule polowisumaj aq llrqs SQAUP Put 101 SUqjvd jlvqdsv oqjL f -qjBmop!s oilqnd aqj uo 31.md jou Op S0131 q;)A jVqjoinsua put sad nn uiiols iolmoo oi Xuadoid sT 1z .qj jo iolowpod aqj punom qinc) alanuoo 11pisui 11rqs iouoilgod oqj, 'U01jVUVA OtIl 10J DOUVUIP.10 IRUU V JO IVAoiddr jo naA ouo uT .qjtm pollvisui aq jsntuSjU0U12Aojduui osoqjL -sogrivag Aumoq- I isomquoN put peon Iviluoj s,Xuodoid aqj Suole kens cjnd ssviS put �jlvmap!s :Dilqnd Ilvisui lleqs nuoijilad QqJL I moilipumSumolloj oql qjm isanbai oqi:poddns uro jjvjs jvqj paIRMPUT OH 'Aliodoid 6 loofqns oqj jo Q&qs onbiun oqj svm st ron sign qj ui s3jovqios Suilsixo aqj possnosip oijjAsioj -jW .uslsop ol!s Suilvoddu Allmnsm aioua lo sojeam got gm weld v qjm do atum ox sauail jejQAQs siQuollijad 041 qIYA laua svqjjvjs jvqj polvotpu! oH -padsoq junoW umolumop Su!.ioluo sialmeij Aq was Avadoid -vodaig"m age pnum=ns "lQuuVid `aq 4AS10,9 AvId isig oqi si Xuadoid ioa�qns OT T8111 PaIVDIM OH -7aodoj.iioqj uijpis Aq pouilino suoil,!puo:) oqj of oaift Ipm Aoqi iuqi !vdai aq Ipm Sui popniouoo QH 'sPlVPLMIS UOql'B-MW 01 polu #pl!nq oqi put poduls put poorjinsaj aq pinom jol oqj jqj pomipui xoD -jw -siowolsm ol aouammuoo v aq pinom Adouro aqj jvqj Polvis -swailrd :)gjej 1 auUopjouoq ol siosuadsq) lonj oqj olvaolai oi o3M I loqljnj OH pinom aunt aum oqi it nb Po MA m Aldwoo al PIM fJQA030-djod1RA H MqcI -10J sluQU10-11 01 f,.DuQSV U01. TOM lvluDwuO . ug Q T qj! SuildwallronAoqllvqlp;alr:)ipuiAurdwoal!oouil,elvdci,qljoxo:)uo-d.jW6SuaMwOqllV 17661 4 0 C �Z jsnSnV jo Sumow nlaw -na I it siroddV jo pnoq SumoZ aqj Aq pomomaj stm isonbal ou i . q www ldom mou v Ilvisui of put spurlsi josuadsip lonj aqj alroolai of jopjo ui :jovqw iooj of po-�nboi wnum= oqi uTqi!m s omwTuis WUVA 2 BUqoos an siouoij!jad aqj Allvog!oadS -AurdwoD mOITO 01 V17081 'V1 uOT,100S uuOJ9 uOt. Ito ougiffecl aqj Aq pojj!tuqns Isonboi u0llvuVA vU0TjV.10p!SUoo.M0A 10J SIRUSIM-11 P120a SUTUOZ OqJL AVAARMH IS3MMUON JLS3M OTC NOLLjori (s,xmvwriaNmAD Amvawoj rno aNuvqvi 't6-A-Lf-Vf1Z :133fcns V661 `I£ 1Sf19f1V :a1vG -9NUNNVrld 90 110JLJMG "W 6AaK003 -f WV1r1rHA41 :NONA Ra!)VNVIN af)VrlrUA 'SINONVr "a laVHDIN :OJL siouilU 1,13adsoia junoN 1K3W1)jvjaG .9Na"vrlj 133aSOMa 1Ma01V AO 3f)VrIrlIA Michael E. Janonis Page 2 August 31, 1994 4. The petitioner shall upgrade the landscaping material around the property and ensure that it is maintained. 5. The petitioner shall submit a signage pack -age to staff for review and approval. All signage shall comply with Village Codes. W Bill Reddy, 105 S. Elm Street, addressed the Zoning Board to raise concerns with how cars are parked on the lot and with stacking of used tires in the rear alley. He asked that staff ensure that this is not continued. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. By a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the variations requested with the conditions of the staff report. �� 1�� iii.'► � ��„f, l � 4A-4 air., le rn lb -l+ r n� ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-37-V-94 Hearing Date: August 25, 1994 PETITIONER: Palatine Oil Co., (Winkelman's Service Stn.) SUBJECT PROPERTY, 310 N. Northwest Hwy. PUBLICATION DATE-, August 10, 1994 (Journal) REQUEST: The petitioners are seeking variations to Sections 14.1804.A.1 and 14.1804.A.3 to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy. MEMBERS PRESENT Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxern Jack Verhasselt ABSENT: None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Bill Reddy Chairman Basnik then introduced case ZBA-37-V-94 being a request for variations to Sections 14.1804.A. I and 14.1804.A.3 to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy. Mr. Ron Cox, President, Palatine Oil Company, Palatine, IL, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Cox stated that he is requesting a variation to the setback requirements to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and install a canopy. He stated that Mr. Joe Pence, leasing dealer for this service station is planning on improving the property to meet EPA regulations which need to be done by November 1, 1994. Mr Cox stated that because of the configuration of the lot they need the variation to improve traffic flow. He further noted that he has met with staff and has agreed to make other improvements to the property which will enhance the property. I.J.DZRA-37-V-94 Page 2 Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Forsythe further noted that the subject property is triangular in shape and fronts on the intersection of Northwest Highway and Central Road. Because of the unique shape of the lot the required 30 foot setbacks are difficult to maintain. The existing building is set back less than I foot from the Central Road property line and approximately 22 feet from the Northwest Highway property line. The proposed canopy would be located 7 feet from the Central Road property line and 18 feet from Northwest Highway. The fuel dispensers are proposed to be set back 17 feet from Central Road and 28 feet from Northwest Highway. Mr. Forsythe further stated that the petitioner has also indicated that the lot will be resurfaced and striped and that the service station will be painted to meet Marathon standards. The landscaping areas will be repaired and new materials installed. Staff is encouraged by the petitioner's desire to upgrade the property which is critical to the downtown development in Mount Prospect. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff would recommend approval of the variations with the following conditions: 1. The petitioner shall install public sidewalk and grass parkway along the property's Central Road and Northwest Highway frontages. These improvements must be installed within one year of approval of a final ordinance for the variation. 2. The petitioner shall install concrete curb around the perimeter of this property to control storm water and ensure that vehicles do not park on the public sidewalks. 3. The asphalt parking lot and drives shall be reconstructed and restriped in accordance with attachment "A". 4. The petitioner shall upgrade the landscaping material around the property and ensure that it is maintained. A final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning for review and approval. 5. The petitioner shall submit a signage package to staff for review and approval. All signage shall, comply with Village Codes. Mount Prospect resident, Mr. Bill Reddy, 105 S. Elm Street, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Reddy asked the Board to look at the value of this proposal to the overall downtown redevelopment. He stated that he frequently passes this location and feels that currently this property looks like a used car lot and feels that Village staff should address safety concerns at this site, citing cars left on jacks and stacks of tires behind the building which might pose dangerous conditions. Mr. Reddy also urged the Board to take a critical look at the overall downtown redevelopment area. Chair -man Basnik then asked Mr. Forsythe if staff checked with the petitioner with regards to staff conditions. Mr. Forsythe stated that the petitioner agrees to comply to the conditions staff recommends. Also, in response to Chaiman Basnik's question about a fence on the property, Mr. Forsythe noted there is not a fence and there is a public alley behind the property. ZBA-37-V-94 Page 3 The Board generally discussed the request for variation, noting to staff the safety concerns raised by Mr. Reddy. Mr. Cassidy then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation from Section 14.1804. A.1 and Section 14.1804. A.3 to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy as shown on petitioners exhibit I and subject to staff conditions I through 5 listed above. Mr. Brettrager seconded the motion. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Cassidy, Floros, Lannon, Luxeni, Verhasselt NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Mr. Floros then stated that he commends Mr. Reddys comments and concerns with regards to the overall improvement of the downtown redevelopment area and hopes that the petitioner and staff addresses the safety issues at this site. Respectfully sub 4,,Iiie Ann Bouris Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 GIL BASN'11K, CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER 9101 DATE: AUGUST 17, 1994 CASE NO.,: ZBA-37-V-94 APPLICANT: PALATINE OIL COMPANY (WR410ELMANNIS) ADDRESS: 310 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY LOCATION MAP: \_j Ivi 1 .%0%0 1 1 - MUM1,11" ST . . . . . . .............. /­� 21 22 0 1, 10 17 li 1 '15 16 13 14 12 16 10 7 5 6 w, 51MAL !I 4L 46 j W IUSSE AV F 100 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: B-4 Business Retail and Service LOT SIZE: %COVERAGE: Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The petitioners are seeking a variation from Section 14.1804.A to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy. ISM KOM 113, la 16"1 - BM, Weml f .9 .109% Summary of Application: The application indicates the service station is requesting to relocate the pump islands in order to improve traffic flow. Also indicated is that the location of the proposed canopy is within the required 30 foot setbacks. Impact on Surrounding Properties: The subject property is triangular in shape and fronts on the intersection of Northwest Highway and Central Road. Because of the unique shape of the lot the required 30 foot setbacks are difficult to maintain. The existing building is set back less than I foot from the Central Road property line and approximately 22 feet from the Northwest Highway property be. The proposed canopy would be located 7 feet from the Central Road property line and IS feet from Northwest Highway. The fuel dispensers are proposed to be set back 17 feet from Central Road and 28 feet from Northwest Highway. The petitioner has indicated that the lot will be resurfaced and striped and that the service station will be painted to meet Marathon standards. The landscaping areas will be repaired and new materials installed. Staff is encouraged by the petitioner's desire to upgrade the property. Staff and the petitioner have had many discussions regarding ways of improving the overall appearance of this property. This property's location at the western entrance to the Central Business District highlights the importance of creating a visually appealing site design. This is the first property that individuals see as they travel eastbound into downtown Mount Prospect. Currently, the property lacks public sidewalks, a grass parkway and curbed/defined entrances. In addition, parked vehicles are scattered over the site and onto the public right-of-way. Staff recommends that the petitioner be required to install public sidewalk and grass parkway along the property's Central Road and Northwest Highway frontages. The Village has a yearly sidewalk replacement program which is administered through our Engineering Division. Homeowners and business owners can sign up to have their sidewalks replaced by a Village contractor and pay a significantly reduced cost. Staff would recommend that the petitioner participate in this program and install a grass parkway and a public sidewalk in the spring of 1995. In addition, the petitioner MUZOL install concrete curb around the perimeter of his property to control storm, water and to ensure that vehicles do not park on the public sidewalks. The downtown area is improved with many structures with reduced setbacks. With the lot's shape it is difficult to maintain the required setbacks and provide adequate parking. The existing building is constructed less than I foot from the north property line. The relocated pump islands and canopy X - will not cause a negative impact on the surrounding properties. The traffic flow will be improved and the Parking lot will be striped and better controlled. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 Engineering has indicated that the sidewalk program is available for the installation of curbing and sidewalk. The Fire Department has indicated that the vapor recovery is a favorable change. Public Works has indicated that an inlet on the north side will need to be repaired and adjusted with the pavement/sidewalk replacement. 11111 W F4�' The petitioners are seeking variations to allow the relocation of the fuel dispenser islands and the addition of an overhead canopy. Staff believes the relocated fuel dispenser will improve the traffic flow on-site and the canopy will be a convenience to the customers and will not negatively impact the surrounding properties. Staff is encouraged by the potential upgrade to the property and would recommend approval of the variations with the following conditions: I The petitioner shall install public sidewalk and grass parkway along the property's Central Road and Northwest Highway frontages. These improvements must be installed within one year of approval of a final ordinance for the variation. 2. The petitioner shall install concrete curb around the perimeter of this property to control storm water and ensure that vehicles do not park on the public sidewalks. I The asphalt parking lot and drives shall be reconstructed and restriped in accordance with attachment "A". 4. The petitioner shall upgrade the landscaping material around the property and ensure that it is maintained. A final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning for review and approval. 5. The petitioner shall submit a signage package to staff for review and approval. All signage shall comply with Village Codes. RFP: hg 0 ffim ORDINANCE NO, WHEREAS, Ron Cox (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a variation with respect to property located at 310 West Northwest Highway (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property); and I WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Lot 1 in Winkelmann's Resubdivision of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 in Henry J. Ehard's Subdivision of that part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 41, North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian Lying North of the Chicago Northwestern Railway Company's Right -of -Way, in Cook County, Illinois. • WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Sections 14.1804.A.1 and 14-1804.A.3 of the Zoning Code to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands and to install a new canopy; and WHEREAS,, a public hearing was held on the request for zoning variations (designated as ZBA Case No. 37-V-94) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of August, 1994, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Pros ect Journal on the 10th day of August, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 37-V-94; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed variations would be in the best interest of the public. a 0 9 Its 14 FAA" We) 0 [fill kNk v = 90614*2 99:011016 *M*1�61911M go 0� SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a variation to the subject property to allow structures within the minimum required 30 foot setback in order to relocate the fuel dispenser islands, and to install a new canopy. SECTION THREE: That the variation granted with this Ordinance is subject to the following conditions: 1 The Petitioner shall install public sidewalk and grass parkway A along the property's Central Road and Northwest Highway frontages. These improvements must be installed within one year of approval of a final Ordinance for the variation. 2. The Petitioner shall install concrete curb around the perimeter of this property to control storm water and ensure that vehicles do not park on the public sidewalks. 3. The asphalt parking lot and drives shall be reconstructed and restriped in accordance with attachment "A". 4 The Petitioner shall upgrade the landscaping material around the property and ensure that is maintained. A final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning for review and approval. 5. The Petitioner shall submit a signage package to staff for review and approval. All signage shall comply with Village Codes. 60, The Petitioner shall grant an easement to the Village for landscaping and entranceway signage at the western edge of the property as illustrated on attachment "A". In addition., the Petitioner shall grant the Village a license for the purpose of parking equipment on the subject property while installing and/or maintaining the landscaping and signage. 7. Outside storage of tires and other automobile parts shall be prohibited on the subject property, adjoining public alley and other public rights-of-way. 8. The Petitioner shall not leave automobiles parked outdoors on jacks while the facility is closed. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. NAYS: P., I -i 61 PASSED and APPROVED this day of r 1994. Gerald L. Farley Village President Velma W. Lowe Deputy Village Clerk A G;,, C, it QTT Ac. N -r Poe a p c S t A tEAS- E M E—KIr 4 fx- tZ-P& A"04.14 Ce-Nt-r"4" 4 tPiw +i., T,)kV't. 1*09'54 VILIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ILLINOIS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO DATE: SEPT. 9. 1994 SUBJECT.- DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT The Fire Department requests approval to dispose of two vehicles which have been determined as surplus. 1979 Chevrolet Suburban FD #506 VIN: CKL169F199176 506 served the Fire Department as the Shift Commander's Command Car. In 1988 the vehicle was placed in reserve status when 509 was purchased. 506 was totally reconditioned in 1988 by shift personnel. Replacement of 506 was scheduled for this fiscal year. Over the years major corrosion of structural members of this vehicle took place. Because of the location of the corrosion it was impossible to make repairs to this vehicle. In addition, extensive mechanical problems with the suspension, engine and transmission have developed. Earlier this year 509, the Shift Commander's vehicle, was involved in an accident that resulted in 509 being declared a total loss. 506 was returned to service. 506 proved to be very unreliable with several breakdowns involving the cooling system, transmission and steering. 506 became unsafe to operate as an emergency response vehicle. The Fire Department will not seek to replace this vehicle. 1987 Chevrolet Suburban FD#509 1GNGR26K7HF76035 On January 8,1994 while responding to an alarm 509 was involved in an accident in the intersection of Golf and Busse Roads. The result of the accident was that 509 was declared a total loss. The vehicle sustained structural and frame damage that could not be repaired. All required reports were submitted to the police and finance departments. This vehicle has since been replaced with a Ford Club Wagon Van that was purchased through the State Purchase Plan. vwl 8/29/94 frl fff Mir 11 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, it has been determined' that it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain the personal property specified hereinbelow; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that the best interests of the Village would be served by the sale of the personal property at a public auction conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference, which auction will be held on Saturday, October 15, 1994 at 11:00 A.M. at the Mount Prospect Public Works Facility, 1700 West Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 65 5/11-76-4 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the following items of personal property owned by the Village of Mount Prospect are no longer useful or necessary and the best interests of the Village will be served by selling the following property at public auction to the highest bidder. Serial No. Inventory No.., Year Make Model Min. Value CKL1 69F1 99176 506 79 Chevrolet Suburban $2500 1 GNGR26K7HF76035 509 87 Chevrolet Suburban $1000 SECTION TWO: That the Northwest Municipal Conference shall conduct a public auction on Saturday, October 15, 1994 at 11:00 A.M. at the Mount Prospect Public Works Facility, 1700 West Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. Anyone interested may view the personal property at the same location between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M. SECTION THREE: That the Northwest Municipe Conference will cause a public notice of the subject auction to be published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald. SECTION FOUR: That within ten (10) days after the successful bid is accepted, the successful bidder shall tender to the Village of Mount Prospect the consideration specified in the bid accepted and upon receipt of such consideration, the Village Manager is hereby authorized to transfer title of said personal property to the successful bidder. Vehicle Auction Page 2 of 2 SECIONJ FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1,1994. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Deputy Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: WELLIAM J. COONEY, JRt DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: AUGUST 31, 1994 SUBJECT: ZBA-40-Z-94, SEMAR HOME BUILDERS PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATIONS LOCATION: 105,109 AND 111 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD Ztwin z sward of Anneals The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration a Map Amendment request resubmitted by Semar Home Builders. Specifically, the petitioners are requesting a rezoning from R -X Single Family to R-1 Single Family in order to allow a subdivision to occur. The request was originally reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their meeting of April 28, 1994. At this meeting the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. The case was then reviewed by the Village Board at * their June 7, 1994 meeting. At this meeting the Village Board denied the request with a vote of 3-2. The case was reconsidered at the meeting of June 211, 1994 and was denied by a vote of 2-2. The petitioner resubmitted his original request which was reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their meeting of August 25, 1994. At the meeting, Mr. Michael Downing, Attorney, presented the request for the petitioners. Mr. Downing indicated that written offers were extended to the two pro yes to the south. One owner counter -offered at an unreasonable price and the other owner did not respond. Mr. Downing proceeded to review the Map Amendment standards and indicated that in his opinion this request meets the necessary criteria. Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated that staff maintains their original recommendation on this request. Mr. Forsythe indicated that staff is not opposed to R-1 zoning on the subject property, however, staff is concerned with the impact that this proposal would have on the future redevelopment of the property to the south. W T'te.,And, Mr. St einenger, representing the property owners to the south discussed the offers made to them by Mr. Semar., It was 'indicated that they were both willing to sell the properties, A, Michael E. Janonis Page 2 May 12, 1994 however not at the terms offered by Mr. Semar The Zoning Board of Appeals held a lengthy discussion on the request. The members felt that the proposed subdivision is similar to the surrounding, developments and they were familiar with the type of homes Semar builds. The members discussed the property to the south and felt that an of was made by the developer. Mr. Basnik indicated his concern with the remaining property to the south and the potential decrease in value due to the development. By a vote of 5-1, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the rezoning request. Plan Commission The Plan Commission met on May I I to consider approval of a 15 -lot preliminary plat of subdivision; a Development Code modification to allow stormwater detention facility side slopes of 4:1; and a Development Code modification to allow a stormwater facility to be no closer than 25 feet from structures on Lots 7 and 9. Michael Su*m,, Planner, explained the preliminary plat of subdivision and staffs primary concerns with this development. He noted that the Semar Subdivision will be detrimental to the development 40 potential of the two remaining R -X lots immediately south of this development, since they could only be served by another cul-de-sac and would cause a double street frontage situation for the lots in the Semar Development or the lots on the north side of Bonita Avenue. Mr. Sims also explained the proposal would create a series of cul-de-sacs along Busse Road that would create potential traffic hazards on this arterial. In regards to the applicant's requested 4:1 side slopes for detention facilities, Mr. Sims noted that such slopes have been approved in the past and that this detention facility will be privately maintained. As for the Development Code modification for stormwater detention facility proximity to structures, staff noted that similar separations have been approved on other single family developments and that staff is currently reviewing the modification of the Development Code that will eliminate the need for a variation for 25 foot separations. Rolf Campbell, 101 Waukegan Road, Lake Bluff, Planning Consultant for the developer, stated that he had reviewed the proposed Semar plat and notes that it creates no adverse impacts and that the cul-de-sac bulb, with minor variations meets Village Code. Mr. Campbell stated his review is based on the three lots controlled by the applicant and that in his opinion, the redevelopment potential of the two lots to the south is the responsibility of the current owners and also their problem. He noted the subdivision meets the requirements of the Village and that he would recommend approval of the Semar plat. The Plan Commission voted 6-1 in favor of recommending approval of the Semar Preliminary Michael E. Jannis Page 3 May 12, 1994 Plat of Subdivision: Commissioner Tortorello explained that she voted against the subdivision because she felt that this was not the best development for the overall area. The Plan Commission then voted 7-0 in favor of recommending approval of a 4:1'stormwater detention facility side slope on Lot 8 and for structures on Lots 7 and 9 to be built no closer than 25 feet from stormwater facilities on Lot S. WJC:hg ' E f RECORD QMtRS OWKRS " WWL5 10S S041111 N!!:'::f AD CIfAFIL FS F. A PAU1. F- W 11 i f S tO9 SOU111 WIS51 fill AN1110NY GE I SEL is f SOUL" stmc;( fill II ASSOC OF 7TH DAY AOVFNF ISTS APPf IC A141 SfMAR 1,f11,F Niiti Il1AC. INt; T d = ( i -x g _ t a r I PU iLIC usRliYEms[- g 1 s _. = ,' r"wg £ l.t7T t LOT 2 ', 3 q LOT 15 lD/ 6 IIT 7 Lt7T 8 T IF . 85-0 T IF 64.0 t T IF . 83.0 TIF .82.0 TIF =X9.0 IF ; 77A? T IF . 75:0 of r�Nt�xt z e fTaca.tTr ce K MOO a 77 _ p 3 LZ a = - E �a in - _ AI AM . g w- € x € i color F t 46 — a Lar 9 x a a _ e a 3 T# .14-0 a SWUM Stwax- LQT 16 � 15 LOT,14 , Lcrr 1� LOT 17 tilt 1i = t�Jf i0 T IF . 85.0 0 T IF 84.0 �� T IF . 84.0 T IF • 840 T IF ■ 79,0 T 1F ■ T7.0 . T If ■ 75.0ro s z ft#l�TM[!i ti[1lM1Cf[ � i F- 1 3 e a ,3 s ' = CX fit AhrAv ., 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-40-Z-94 Hearing Date: August 25, 1994 PETITIONER: Semar Home Builders SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1055 109 and 111 S. Busse Road PUBLICATION DATE: August 10, 1994 REQUEST: The petitioners are seeking a Map Amendment as allowed in Article 11, Section 14.203.1) to rezone the subject property from R -X Single Family to R-1 Single Family in order to allow a subdivision. MEMBERS PRESENT.- Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxem Jack Verhasselt ABSENT.- None OBJECTORSANTERESTED PARTIES: Richard Steiniger Paul Traficanti Chairman Basnik then introduced case ZBA-40-Z-94 being a request for a MAP Amendment as allowed in Article II, Section 14.203.1► to rezone the subject property from R -X Single Family to R-1 Single Family in order to allow a subdivision. Mr. Semar,, 720 Hiawatha Court, President, Semar Home Builders, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Michael Downing, Miller, Forrest & Downing, Glenview, Illinois, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals as Attorney for Phil Semar, Principal, Semar Builders. Mr. Downing stated that this is a resubmission from the April 28, 1994, meeting that the Zoning Board of Appeals previously approved unanimously with a vote of 5-0 for a MAP ZBA40-Z-94 Page 2 Amendment which was turned down by the Village Board with a vote of 3-2. He stated that the petitioners are looking to develop approximately 6 acres of property on Busse Road. Semar Builders is proposing to build 15 single-family homes with a price range from $4001000.00 to $5501000.00. Mr. Downing then summarized the standards for Map Amendments as stated in the staff report. They are as follows. 1. Compatibility with existing uses of property within the general area of the property in question. Mr. Downing stated that there are many similar lots which are zoned R -I and have been developed as R-1. 2. Compatibility with the Zoning Classification of property within the general area of the property in question. The staff reports states that the general area contains R -X and R -I Zoning Classifications, predominantly R-1 and the petitioners would concur with that finding. 3. The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing Zoning Classification. Mr. Downing stated that they believe of the maintaining the existing zoning would represent a gross underutilization of the property and feels the R-1 zoning is most suitable for this site. 4. Consistency with the trend of development in the general area of the property in question, including changes, which have taken place in its present Zoning Classification. The trend of development in this area and Mount Prospect as a whole has been to the R-1 Zoning and Subdivisions. 5. The compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification. Mr. Downing stated that it is mostly single-family residential. Mr. Downing further stated that they have read the staff report and feel those concerns are not Map Amendment but subdivision concerns. 6. The objectives of the current comprehensive plan for the Village and the impact of the proposed amendment on the said objectives. The Comprehensive Plan indicates the subject area as single family which complies with the requested use. 7. The suitability of the property in question for permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification. Mr. Dawningstated the proposed property is ideal. Mr. Downing then stated that the %.' petitioners feel the proposal meets the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and asks for approval. Mr. Downing further noted that the petitioners have gone before the Plan Commission and the Village Board. Some of the Trustees on the Village Board felt they should obtain appraisals of the property on the South and resubmit proposals to the owners of the property. The petitioners have in good faith attempted to acquire the two properties to the South and have been turned down. In so doing, they come before the Board to resubmit for the MAP Amendment. Chairman Basnik asked who owned the property at 119 S. Busse. Mr. Downing stated that Mr. Steineger owned that property and originally wanted to be included in the offer of property acquisition however, the property inbetween did not want to sell. ZBA-40-Z-94 Page 3 Planner, Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff memo for the Zoning Board of Appeals. He indicated that staff has not changed it's position from the original request and would recommend denial. Mr. Forsythe added that the acquisition cost should have no bearing on the ZBA's decision. The decision to grant the rezoning should be based on land use issues. Mr. Richard Steiniger, 119 S. Busse, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Steiniger stated that he represents his step -mother as executor of his fathers estate. He stated that they would agree to sell their property if Semar Builders approached them with a "fair" price. He had the property appraised at $350,000.00 to $400,000-00 at the time the original offer was made to the owners of the 5 lots which Semar intends to acquire for subdivision. He stated at that time the group was offered between $3271,000.00 and $374,000.00 each. Mr. Steiniger would Eke to know how much money the owners actually received and feels that the current offer from Semar Builders of $273,900.00 is insufficient for his property. Chairman Basnik asked Mr. Steiniger if he checked with Real Estate people to see how his property would be affected financially if the new subdivision occur -red because that parcel and Mr. Traficanti's land would be R -X if the other three were to be developed as R-1. Planning Director, Bill Cooney stated that all 5 lots are currently R -X and the surrounding properties in that area are predominately zoned R-1. If the proposed subdivision is approved by the Village Board, staff has concerns with the remaining property being developed later with a substandard plan. He also noted that the proposal did get approval by the Zoning Board in April and has been approved by the Plan Commission. Mr. Larry McKone, 422 Parview Ct., Arlington Heights, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals as son-in-law to the president of Semar Builders. Mr. McKone stated that the original offer of $350,000.00 to the owner of each lot was based on a lot size of 120'x 700' (84,000 square feet) as opposed to 70,000 square feet properties owned by Mr. Steiniger and Mr. Traficanti which is significantly less square footage thus the price value of approximately $280,000.00. He further stated that this is a fair price for undeveloped land of that size. Mr. Paul Traficanti introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals as the son of Wanda Traficanti. They own the property at 115 S. Busse. He stated that his father passed away and he is representing his mother with regard to the property. Mr. Traficanti met with the other property owners and stated that Mr. Chuck Willis bought his property with the intention of investment. Mr. Geisel, who owns the second parcel, reached a ZEA -40-Z-94 Page 4 selling price for his home. And, the church on the third property, agreed to sell which leads to his property and Mr. Steinigcr's property. He stated that they were all for the development from the beginning as it was explained to them with 26 to 28 houses and that all 5 lots were to be developed. Mr. Traficanti said that his property is land -locked by the Village. Also, Mr. Traficanti stated that all 5 of the properties are R -X and should be developed as such. Mr. Stelm*ger presented a paper with the original percentages of money offered from Semar Builders to the property owners. Ms. Luxern asked if a parcel was included now that wasn't included in April. Mr. Cooney stated that this was the exact same case as in April and that the Village Board requested confirmation of a true negotiation between all of the parties involved. Ms. Luxem asked if the proposal comes back a year from now, would the Board still have to rezone to R-1. In response, staff said they would. Mr. Tony Geisel, 109 S. Busse,, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Geisel stated that his property is in the middle of the 3 lots in question. He stated that by his definition, land -lock means no access and he would not define the properties as such. Originally, there was no difference on price per square foot on any of the properties. His neighbor agreed to subsidize his property to persuade him to move. Mr. Peter Lannon stated that he feels it is extremely distasteful when government interferes with private enterprise. He feels the Board should have concerns with the type of development but should not interfere with the monetary aspect. He stated that it is not the purpose of government to see that everyone is satisfied with the price. Mr. Floros concurred with Mr. Lannon. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the proposed request. Chairman Basnik feels that the properties at 115 & 119 have a valid argument should the other 3 parcels be developed as R-1 and their property remains R -X, what damage to their property value would exist. N1r. Lannon then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a MAP Amendment as allowed in Article 11, Section 14.203.1) to rezone the subject property from R -X Single Family to R-1 Single Family in order to allow a subdivision to occur as shown in petitioners exhibit 1. The motion was seconded by Mr. Bre'ttrager. ZBA40-Z-94 Page 5 Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Floros, Lannon, Luxem, Verhasselt NAYS: Basnik Mr. Cassidy abstained because he missed the meeting in April with regards to this case. The motion was approved by a vote of 5-1.. Respectfully subnvitted, Julie Ann Bouris Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TOMOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASMY44 CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY P. FORSYTH 9 PLANNERI PA DATE: AUGUST 17, 1994 SUBJECT: ZBA-40-Z-94,, SEMAR HOME BUILDERS LOCATION: 105, 109 AND 111 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD The petitionerhas resubrm-tted a request. to rezone the subject propertyfirom R -X Single Fanuil to R- I Sin amily in order to apply fora I5 -lot subdivision, The su�ject request was, presented to ,gle F i the Zoning Board, of Appeals 'at their meeting of Apnil 28, 1994. The Zoning Board of Apple,als recornmendedp arovalof the request by a vote of 5-0, The Village Board demied, the request by a p vote of 3-2. The petitioner has indicated an attempt to purchase the property to the south and indicated he has been unsuccessful to come to agreement with the property owners. The petitioner is r�equesting that the Zoming Board of Ap peWs, and Village Board reconsiderhis�roposal given thefact that he has made a 4 good faith efflort to acquire the perty., Staff m tintai 'pro gu ains Its opposition to the proposalfior the reasons outlined inthe attached memorandum. RFP:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GEL BASNEK9 CHAIRMAN gob.` - I I -7m v Mv AV 133 09 94 j 1 "51 E 111 E PI. 1703 Aw 0% ft CLC AV 203 os z P—kb 0: P-4, 205 2CIS 205 ft"K 133 208 CNN 2C9;' 210 209 oil — 4 W9 4" f^b Ah 2wi j I — — ** 'A RP' 7 L PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: Current: R -X; Proposed: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 6.04 Acres %COVERAGE: N/A FROM: RAY P. FORSYTH , PLANNER DATE: APRIL 18, 1994 CASE NO.: ZBA-15-Z-94 APPLICANT: SEMAR HOME BUILDERS ADDRESS: 105,1109 AND 111 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD LOCATION MAP: gob.` - I I -7m v Mv AV 133 09 94 j 1 "51 E 111 E PI. 1703 Aw 0% ft CLC AV 203 os z P—kb 0: P-4, 205 2CIS 205 ft"K 133 208 CNN 2C9;' 210 209 oil — 4 W9 4" f^b Ah 2wi j I — — ** 'A RP' 7 L PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: Current: R -X; Proposed: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 6.04 Acres %COVERAGE: N/A �� s gob.` - I I -7m v Mv AV 133 09 94 j 1 "51 E 111 E PI. 1703 Aw 0% ft CLC AV 203 os z P—kb 0: P-4, 205 2CIS 205 ft"K 133 208 CNN 2C9;' 210 209 oil — 4 W9 4" f^b Ah 2wi j I — — ** 'A RP' 7 L PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: Current: R -X; Proposed: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 6.04 Acres %COVERAGE: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The petitioners are seeking a Map Amendment as allowed in Article 11, Section 14.203.D to rezone the subject property from R -X Single Family to R-1 Single Family in order to allow a subdivision to occur. A A, Summary of Application: The application indicates the subdivision will continue the trend of redevelopment in the area as evidenced by the recent subdivisions to the west and south. Also noted is that the subdivision conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. The application indicates a selling price of $400,,000 to $5501000 for the homes. Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioners have submitted a preliminary plat of subdivision to the Plan Commission indicating 15 lots with on-site detention on a cull -de -sac street. This subdivision will be reviewed by the Plan Commission on May 11. The subject property contains 3 lots consisting of 6.04 acres and frontage of 360' on Busse Road. This area has experienced several new subdivisions in recent years. The West side of Busse Road, between Central and Bonita, is zoned R-1 and contains 7 (one acre) lots that have homes that are well maintained or newly constructed. This area is unlikely to be redeveloped in the future. Also located on the west of Busse is Frediani Subdivision that contains 8 lots and all but one have been improved with new homes. The east side of Busse Road is Zoned R- I to the north and contains several homes and Westbrook School. The subject property consists of 3 lots that are approximately 2 acres each. To the south are, 2, lots that have 100' of frontage and are, 1.7 and 1.8 acres. South of the 2 lots is the Jesus Chsist of Latter Day Saints Church and the Ka,thcon Subdivision, that contains 12 lots zoned R.-1. The Zoning Ordinance fists several standards for Map Amendments. Following is a brief discussion of the standards as they relate to this request. I. Compatibility with existing uses of property within the general area of the property in question: As mentioned above this area has had a trend of R- I rezoning and subdivisions. 2. Compatibility with the Zoning Classification of property within the general area of the property in question: The general area contains R -X and R- I Zoning Classifications, predominantly R-1. 3. The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing Zoning Classification. Gil Basnik, Chairman Page 3 Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals The present zoning would allow I single family home on each lot. 4. Consistencywith the trend of development in the general area of the property in question, including changes, which have taken place in its present Zoning,Classification: The trend of development in this area and Mount Prospect as a whole has been to the R-1 Zoning and Subdivisions. The compatibiRy of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification,,., The PrVertw to the Sou, th contains 2 lots that ire I Win width. Because the, trend of development 'R is to, -1 R's, like y that this area would, also be redevelopedin the future. With afirontage of only ,2 001 a sirrailar subdivision could not occur. A night-of -way'requires 66 of land which leaves 1,341 The resulting subdivision will create double frontage lots on thesubjec, on or the 11 - t subdivi i Kathcon and church properties. There would also be 4 cull -de -sacs in a veryclose pro xiimiky that ,could pose traffic , . life safety and public works problems. The 2 lots remaining would either be left as very large lots with one home each or a substandard subdivision would be requested which would require several development code modifications. 6. The objectives of the current comprehensive plan for the Village and the impact of the proposed amendment on the said objectives: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the subject area as single family which is the requested use. 7. The suitability of the property in question for permitted uses fisted in the proposed zoning classification: The proposed subdivision meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance forot size and lot widths. Development Code modificafions wiU be requested for lot depth on two lot's on the cull -de -sac bulb, and separation firom the detention pond ftom, the required 751 to 251,. Staff is not Opposed to R-1 zoning in this area. However, ,staff has concerns VA"th the impact that this proposal would have on the future redevelopment of they property to the south, The have indicated that they attempted to purchase thesebut were unable torIfeachanagreement. all 5 lots were included 'in a development plan, many concerns of staff would be resolved. Public works and fire saf,would prefer that cuff -de -sacs beed andprefer through streets. Attached to this report is a possible subdivi'sion using all 5 lots and elinuinating thecull-de-sac. Because the requested rezoning has a negative impact on the future of the property to the south staff would recommend denial of the request. The Engineering Division indicated that all required public improvements will be required with the subdivision. Gil Basnik, Chairman Page 4 Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals The Fire Department indicates that the water systems must be looped. Inspection Services indicates that all lots will require a grading plan in order to maintain the required grading. Public Works has indicated the following: 1. Parkway tree fees will be required with the subdivision. 2. It is recommended that the subdivision be redesigned to eliminate the cul-de-sac. 3. The storm sewer system should be redesigned and relocated to acceptable locations. 4. Maintenance of the detention area is the responsibility of the homeowners. 5. Watermain must be looped ARY/RECOAMNDATION The petitioners have requested to rezone approximately 6.04 acres of R -X property to R-1 Single Family in order for a subdivision to occur. Staff recommends denial of the requested rezoning due to the proposal's impact on the overall development of this area. It is recommended that the petitioner continue to pursue the acquisition of the two adjacent parcels to enable a more compatible subdivision to be developed. I RFP:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois ?�D TO; MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER /**on FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, JR., DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: AUGUST 31, 1994 SUBJECT: ZBA-39-A-94, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS The Zoning Board transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for various Zoning Ordinance Amendments proposed by staff. g The request was reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their regular meeting of August 25, 1994. At the meeting, Ray Forsythe, Planner, discussed the request. Attached to this memo are the proposed changes. The Zoning Board discussed the requested changes and indicated their support. There was discussion on item #6 which relates to the length of time a temporary trailer can be kept on an approved construction site. Staff has further reviewed this and has made a revision to the proposed language which indicates the Building Code shall apply to the approved length of time. By a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as detailed in the staff memo dated August 18,1994. I kyl Lei 12 a 8 U ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-39-A-94 Hearing Date: August 251, 1994 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect SUBJECT PROPERTY.- None PUBLICATION DATE: August 10, 1994 REQUEST: The Village is seeking to amend various Sections of Chapter 14 "Zoning" of the Municipal Code. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Peter Lannon Elizabeth Luxem Jack Verhasselt ABSENT. None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik then introduced case ZBA-39-V-94 being a request to amend various Sections of Chapter 14 "Zoning" of the Municipal Code. Village Planner, Ray Forsythe outlined the proposed amendments to the overall Zoning Code Amendment made in October 1993. The following proposed changes to the amendments will further address clarification of the Zoning Amendments. 1. 14.304.C. Number of Buildings on a Residential Zoning Lot. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff proposes the importance of specifying only I principal use in all zoning parcels so that I person could not put 2 commercial buildings up and not be required to put a Planned Unit Development. This should include commercial and industrial properties. 2. 14.302.D. Regulations for Fences and Walls. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff would note that currently the Ordinance provides for a 3 foot setback to provide a visual clearance when a driveway and fence intersect. Staff would like to change the Ordinance to include ZBA-39-A-94 Page 2 a sight triangle ordinance which was adopted in 1992 but at that time did not include fences. The proposed change would allow a I foot setback on comer tots from the property line along exterior sideyards. When a driveway, alley, or road intersects, the sight triangle setbacks would apply. 3. 14.306.A.4 Separation Between Buildings. Mr. Forsythe stated that currently there is a required 10 foot setback between pools and the principal structure except for a detached deck or patio. The amendment allows decks attached to the principal building to attach to a swimming pool if all required rear and sideyard setbacks are met and the deck is designed with a gate between the deck and pool and access is provided to the yard from the deck. 4. 14.306.D.6.a Location. Mr. Forsythe stated that there is a Building Code requirement for a 15 foot rear yard setback for swimming pools. Chairman Basnik asked how staff came up with the 15 foot setback. In response, Mr. Forsythe stated that it is in the BOCA Codes and staff also looked at other municipalities with regard to the setback requirements for pools. He further noted that this issue comes up frequently to the Zoning Board and should be included in the Zoning Ordinance. 5. 14.306.E. Permitted Obstructions in Required Yards. Mr. Forsythe stated that currently the ordinance allows eaves, chimneys and bay windows to encroach into a required sideyard. Staff would like to include storm gutters to the encroachment. Also, swimming pools are being added to the permitted encroachment in a rear yard. This clarifies the required setback and would permit a deck to be attached to a pool. Mr. Forsythe further noted that air conditioner units are required to be placed in the rear yard. The ordinance permits a sideyard unit if for efficiency reasons it cannot be placed in the rear. Staff would like the installer of the unit to provide justification as to efficiency reasons for sideyard placement and include requirements for the unit to be screened from view from the front of the house so it does not cause an obstruction. Chairman Basnik asked how the efficiency reason is determined. Mr. Forsythe stated that the installer of the air conditioning unit would provide the percentage of efficiency lost by placement and also the structure sometimes does not allow for the wiring from the rear. 6. 14.310. C. Standard for the R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts. Mr. Forsythe stated that currently the Zoning Ordinance permits temporary trailers for a period of one year. Staff would like to change this ordinance to include any approved construction projects, not just R-3 and R4 Zoning Districts. Staff and the Zoning Board generally discussed the time period allotted. Planning Director, Bill Cooney, stated that the builder could request time extensions for projects. Staff agreed to look into the I year time period and make sure the requirements match the typical use. 4, '04 ZBA-39-A-94 Page 3 7. 14.402.B Nonconforming Buildings and Structures. Mr. Forsythe stated that currently the ordinance allows structures located on lots which are 50 feet or less to extend into the required setback up to 50% of the setback requirement. Staff would like to change this to lots 5 5' or less in width, a non -conforming building or structure may be extended with the established setback in a required rear yard or sideyard, provided that such non -conformity is no more than 50% of the required setback. This allow's only the extension of an existing setback and not extended further into the setback. 8- 14.702. Permitted Uses. Mr. Forsythe stated that currently parking lots and structures are permitted and conditional uses in the B-3 District. This amendment eliminates this duplication and requires a conditional use for a parking lot or parking structure as the principal use on a lot. 9. 14.2215. Driveways. Mr. Forsythe stated that because circular driveways are typically a convenience and not necesarily a hardship, staff is proposing they be permitted only as a conditional use. Lot coverage requirements will be in effect and variations will be required if the front yard or total lot coverage exceeds the maximum allowed. 10. 14.2217. In Yards. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff proposes off-street parking shall conform with the following standards. A. Residential Districts. Off-street parking shall meet the required setback of the specific district. B. Non -Residential Districts. Off-street parking shall be permitted within ten feet of the property line unless adjacent to single family residential districts. Off-street parking shall be prohibited in required yards that are adjacent to single family residential districts. This amendment will allow comer lots and other difficult lots to be developed. 11. 14.2308.E. Perimeter Landscaping. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff proposes all refuse disposal areas shall be screened on all four sides. 12, 14.20401. Definitions. W. Forsythe stated the definition of a "sight triangle". When a driveway and a street intersects, then will be a 10' setback on each way with a triangle created. When a car backs out of a driveway where there is a fence, it will provide an adequate view of the sidwalk and street. The Zoning Board discussed with staff the specifics of the fencing requirements on comer lots. Mr. Lannon referenced Amendment 1, stating that he could understand the limiting of buildings on residential properties but couldn't understand staff position on business and industrial properties as long as there is a permitted use within the district. In response, Bill Cooney stated that a PUD Ordinance would enable the Village to have more control in the ZBA-39-Z-94 Page 4 design elements of a commercial/industrial property under the PUD requirements. Also, it would allow the petitioner more flexibility than if they had to follow standard zoning requirements. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed circular drives and lot coverage sizes. Also, the future amendment to the Zoning Code with regards to the parking and size of a commercial vehicle in a residential area. Chairman Basnik mentioned to staff of the possible future change of zoning for sheds. Mr. Brettrager then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve the amendments to various Sections of Chapter 14 "Zoning" of the Municipal Code as outlined in staff report dated August 18, 1994, subject to staff looking into wording and changes for Zoning Board approval related to time allotted for trailer in item #6. The motion was seconded by Mr. Verhasselt. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Cassidy, Floras, Lannon, Luxem, Verhasselt NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Respectfully submitted, '-f �, , B� , ,.;;d �uliie Ann Bouris Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNM CHAIRMAN FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 18, 1994 SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS Outlined below are proposed zoning text amendments that staff has drafted in response, to issues that have been raised since the overall Zoning Code Amendment last October. Please review the proposed amendments and be prepared to discuss these items at our August 25th public hearing. 1. 1.4.304.C, Nym,bgr of Build,ings on Residential nin Currently the Zoning Ordinance limits one principal building on a residential lot and is silent on commercial/industrial districts. The proposed amendment includes all districts unless there is a Planned Unit Development. Current W. Not more than one principal building shall be located on any zoning lot in a residential zoning district, except in the case of a planned unit development in the multi family residential districts, where more than one,pn i'nc pal building on a zoning lot shall be allowed as part of a planned unit development. PAramd, Agrding., 0 Not more than one principal building shall be located on any zoning lot in a zoning district, except in the case of a PUD, where more than one principal building on a zoning lot shall be allowed as part of a PUD. 2. 14.304.D.. Regulations &6r, F ng,e_s and, Walls. The previous Zoning Ordinance permitted fences on comer lots with a I foot setback. The revised Zoning Ordinance requires a 3 foot setback which was developed to provide adequate site lines. The proposed amendment will resolve the site line issue on lots which have a sideyard driveway or alley and permit a I foot setback on comer lots with no drives. CugaentWordi'ML.- 1. b(2) On Corner lots, any fence shall be placed entirely behind the principal building and maintain a three foot (3 ) se tbackftom property line along exterior side yard. Zoning Ordinance Amendments Page 2 1_Pr_Q "os nrding, On comer lots, any fence shall be placed entirely behind the principal building and maintain a I foot setback from the property line along exterior sideyards. However, when the fence intersects with a driveway, alley or right-of-way a sight triangle must be maintained. 3. 14.306.A.4... Se).arattion Betweep, Rud,ding's0,611 There is currently a required 10 foot setback between pools and the principal structure. The amendment permits pools to be attached to a deck which is attached to the principal structure. currentbrdl 4 Separation Between Buildings. A detached accessory building or structure shall be located no closer to the principal building than ten feet (10% except where a detached garage is constructed with fire -rated drywall to meet the requirements of Mount Prospect Building Code. However, the minimum separation permitted is three feet ('). Pro,posed'W-9,1rdlin 4. Separation Between Buildings. A detached accessory building or structure shall be located no closer to the principal building than ten feet (10'), except where a detached garage is constructed with fire -rated drywall to meet the requirements of Mount Prospect Budding Code. However, the minimum separation permitted is three feet (3). Decks attached to the principal building are permitted to attach to a swimming pool if all required rear and sideyard setbacks are met and the deck is designed with a gate between the deck and pool and access is provided to the yard from the deck. 4. '14.30,6. Location., There is a Building Code requirement for a 15 foot rear yard setback for swimming pools. The present language in the Zoning Ordinance is not clearly written in regards to setbacks. The proposed amendment clarifies the required setbacks and makes the Zoning Code consisted with the Building Code. Current W6� Swimming pools shall be located entirely behind the rear line of the building of the principal structure on 'the lot in the R-1, R -A, R-2, and R Districts. Swimming pools shall not be permitted in any required yard front or exterior side yards. Prq 41 .UoggdFIz._' Swimming pools shall be located entirely behind the rear line of the building of the principal structure on the lot in the R-1, R -A, R-2, and R -X Districts. Swimming pools shall not be permitted in any required front, side or exterior side yards. Pools Zoning Ordinance Amendments Page 3 are permitted to encroach into the rear yard provided a minimum of fifteen (15) feet is maintained from the rear property line to the edge of the structure. MKIKIDNAN MMI=� M101M, C � I A- Currently the ordinance allows eaves, chimneys and bay windows to encroach into a required sideyard. To clarify that eaves include storm gutters, storm gutters are being added to the list of permitted encroachments. B. Swimming pools are being added to the permitted encroachment in a rear yard. This clarifies the required setback. C. Air conditional units are required to be placed in the rear yard. The ordinance permits a sideyard unit if for efficiency reasons it cannot be placed in the rear. This amendment clarifies the requirements to place a unit on the side and also requires screening. Qgment ffhcAW These structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards, as follows: 2. Eaves, chimneys and bay windows extending into such yards not more than twenty-four (24) inches, however, in no case shall any such obstruction be located within twelve inches (12'9 of a property line. LRrgpgsed ordin These structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards, as follows: 2. Eaves, storm gutters, chimneys and bay windows extending into such yards not more than twenty-four (24) inches, however, in no case shall any such obstruction be located within twelve inches (12") of a property line. Current Wording,-, I Patios, balconies, wood decks and handicapped ramps may encroach in the required rear yard; provided a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet is maintained between the rear property line and the near edge of the structure, and that no structure is. located over or upon an easement. Handicapped ramps may encroach into 50% of a required sideyard ftoposed Wgrding,*, 3. Patios, balconies, wood decks, swimming pools and handicapped ramps may encroach in the required rear yard; provided a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet is maintained between the rear property line and the near edge of the structure, and that no structure is located over or upon an easement. Handicapped ramps may encroach into 50% of a required sideyard. Zoning Ordinance Amendments Page 4 rrent In 6. . Central air conditioning units shall be located on the rear elevation of any principal structure. If the unit cannot be reasonably placed on the rear elevation because of operational reasons4 such unit may be placed in up to twenty-five percent (25%) of a required sideyard provided such location does not result in exhaust discharge upon any adjoining building or vegetation. ProgpMtd,rd i", 6. Central air conditioning units shall be located on the rear elevation of any principal structure. If the unit cannot be reasonably placed on the rear elevation because of operational reasons, such unit may be placed in up to twenty-five percent (25%) of a required, sideyard, provided such location does not result in exhaust discharge upon any adjoining building or vegetation. Documentation verifying that the unit cannot be located at the rear of the structure shall be submitted by the air conditioning installer and approved by the Director of Planning. A screening plan which includes fencing or landscaping must be submitted with the permit and approved by the Director of Planning. Currently the Zoning Ordinance permits temporary trailers for approved construction projects. This amendment permits temporary classrooms for up to one year. This item will also be renumbered and moved from "Standards for the R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts." There was a mistake made when numbering the ordinance. Current, Wor, Temporary buildings or structures may be allowed subject to the following regulations: 1. Temporary trailers or facilities for approved construction projects are permitted for a period of one (1) year. Such facilities shall be located to conform with the applicable setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The facility shall be removed upon completion of the construction project. 1!r2p,osed,'W"Iord,'I",",P.,. Temporary Uses. 1. Temporary trailers or facilities for approved construction projects are permitted rX V%pAftA %C PUT -U a .., Wftte. yeal. F subject to the standards of the Building Code. Such facilities shall be located to conform with the applicable setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The facilities shall be removed upon completion of the construction project. 2. Temporary trailers used as classrooms or other similar uses that are ancillary to an existing school use are permitted for up to one year. Such facilities shall be located Zoning Ordinance Amendments Page 5 to conform with the applicable setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. 14.402.B. None onfatm,JR& Buildings and Structures, Currently the ordinance allows structures located on lots which are 50 feet or less to extend into the required setback as long as a minimum of 50% of the standard is maintained. This allows properties which may only encroach by a small amount to extend further into the setback. This amendment would permit the building or structure to be extended at the established setback and does not allow any further encroachments. The amendment also includes lots which are 55 feet or less. The R -A District typically contains lots which are 50'-55' in width. Accessory structures on lots which are 55' or less are permitted a reduced 3 foot setback. .,Current Wordinz However, on lots 50 feet or less in width, a non -conforming building or structure may be extended in a required rear yard or side yard provided that such non -conformity is no more than 50% of the current rear yard or sideyard requirement PLaposed 'Word ifwl However, on lots 55 feet or less in width, a non -conforming building or structure may be extended with the established setback in a required rear yard or sideyard, provided that such non -conformity is no more than 50% of required setback. 8. 14.1702, FILrmnitted LJIes Currently parking lots and structures are a permitted and conditional use in the B-3 District. This amendment eliminates this duplication and requires a conditional use for a parking lot or parking structure as the principal use. urgent ,ar 45. Parking lots and structures Prouow ' '!Q _dLW Delete parking lots and structures (#45) as a permitted use in this Section. R=A Because circular driveways ar typically a convenience and not necessarily a hardship, staff is proposing they be permitted only as a conditional use. Lot coverage requirements will be in effect and variations will be required if the front yard or total lot coverage exceeds the maximum allowed. Current Wording, - 1. Number. One driveway may be permitted per lot, with a maximum of one (1) curb -cut onto the street pavement per driveway. Circular or dual frontage driveways may be Zoning Ordinance Amendments Page 6 permitted only by variation. PLQROdin 1. Number. One driveway may be permitted per lot, with a maximum of one (1) curb -cut onto the street pavement per driveway. Circular or dual frontage driveways may be permitted only by Conditional Use. 10. 14.211,7. In Ygrds, Parking lots in non-residential areas must meet the required building setbacks. Staff is proposing to reduce the parking setbacks to 10 feet unless it abuts residential. Ten feet is sufficient to provide adequate landscaping and all applicable lot coverage and interior lot landscaping will be in force. This will permit some difficult lots to be developed which are restricted because of dual frontages. Current ord Off-street parking setbacks shall meet the requirements of the specific zoning district. Rr2Msd_JY.qrd ing, Of parking shall conform with the following standards: A. Residential Districts. Off-street parking shall meet the required setbacks of the specific district. B. Non -Residential Districts. Off-street parking shall be permitted within ten feet (W) of the property line unless adjacent to single family residential districts. Off-street parking shall be prohibited in required yards that are adjacent to single family residential districts. 11. 14.2308.,peri JerLandscapim' There is currently a conflict with the accessory structure standards for dumpster screening. This amendment resolves the conflict and requires all four sides to be screened: Cgr ent I .rffiordin&! E. Screening of Refuse Disposal Areas. All refuse disposal areas shall be screened on at least three (3) sides by a solid wood fence or an equivalent screening material to a height of six feet (6). 0 Provosed Wording. Screening of Refuse Disposal Areas. All refuse disposal areas shall be screened on all four sides by a solid wood fence or an equivalent screening material to a height of six feet (6). 15 Page 7 2. 14124011 Prf!Ujfl' 119011 A definition of "sight triangle" is proposed to identify the required setback for fences on comer lots which intersect with driveways or alleys. a Ermosed Aar-danz, Sight Triangle- No improvements shall be placed, nor plant materials allowed to grow within the sight triangle so as to obstruct or limit the sight distance of motorists. Such a triangle shall have legs of twenty five feet (25') along the rights-of-way line when two (2) streets intersect and ten feet (10) along the right-of-way line and the driveway edge when a street and a driveway intersect. The maximum height of any obstruction shall be three feet (Y) within the sight triangle, unless otherwise permitted by the Municipal Code. RPF:hg :SMOTTOJ Sv PRal Pug 9q a9-4j"eUTa-xaT4 TTR14S e-9-#a'9oc-VT UOT40as bUTUIMTMS aOj S5foiq, Os -STood Qq4eS PeaTnbaij aqq bUTAJTJvTc� Aq papulaulle aeq4jnj Aqaj94 ST UOU19 SIR e , pap 9 0 G, " 90C VT 0 UOT40S 49141 a : Unoll MOI1351S qq4' aoaj pavA atiq 04 pap'TA,oad sT ssalaoe pule Tood pue 5pap v44 ueemqaq aq, 44TM P'9UbT, aP ST 5[,O!a'p 944,, pue -4em aae sXoe-q,4qs P-I�gAqPTs PuePOaTnbaa TTv' ms e 04 140e4qg jT Tood buTmMt 05*4; Pa*4,qTmaad aag 6UTPTTnq' Tied'Tau,Tad' aq-4 04 paRoe44V SX09(3 GE) qqaj aeatl'.4 ST Pq-4'j,Tma,9d ulig T4MIM aedas ancTUT''W. 9144 1.18,Aam',OH *9POD b'U'TPTT"'nq 4oadsoad qunow 9q4 JO S4U9U8aTnb9a aq4 499m 0-4 TTRmAZIP paqezr�aaTj t14,Tm pe4,onaqsuo;o ST Of)glVb pqT40R-4qp aaagm qdaoxwww 1 GOT) 4919,; uaq uR44 bu�PTTnq TvdTOUTad 8LI4 04 .1850TO Ou P94200T aq TT7214S aan4on`a4s .10 bUTPTTnq A-'0ss900P PKIOV-48P V -SbUTPT-rn(l ua;a^qaU U0T:teavdqS' vit VT40aT * o V*90C*'VT UOS 4R4'4•: SMOTTOJ SP PPSI PUP 9q a9'4jPUT8J8T4 TTvqs 0 s lwlaan4ana4s Tvd-[i0U'Tjd aqq o'4 P9tiDe4:4Q ST T40TT4M 3[0ap e o-4 pqT4,C)e-4qg aq o4 l'ood e bullmOTT''R Aq papuiamv ;raqqanj Acre-latf ST "Papugule sv V*V'190c'*'VT I :21MMI KOIWHS UOT409S :4VIqjj 110PGUT94UTPUL aq q,snm albuvl'.14 '4T#0TS 9 AetA-j # m j -qqbTJ aO A811P 'Agm*aATJ'p R q4TM, eqq uaq a 9A;MOH -SPJPADPTS a8TJ9qX9 buo'TE> OUT I 0 '1 adoad aq4 moxi Xovqqqs 400J T U UT'Uq,UT QU PUR bUT''P'jTnq' Tvd'rOUTald a q:4 PUTqa ATa2T4U8 1, A #q* a P9DeTd Dq TTRLls, 93u9J Aug 's-401' JaUaoo uci (Z)" 11 *sUgM PuR saouaa joj SIl0T4R-[nba'd,, 0 0, *smOTTOJ se peea pule aq -'G-4J'2uT9.'9qi TTQq,,S (3-tr0C*tlT UOT409S 4QN4 OS #'#P;DUTV`4UTeUl ST allTT 4qb-rs sR bUOT Sle, aUTI 4-4,aa'doad alq4 J0j 400J OU10 UTT4'4TM, pq4P0o'jsaoluej Irl UTm0TTl2'" Xq papuawle .x9tj'4.xnj Aq9aexj s -t 'P9PU9mP sQ G,'V0C*VT UOT*4099 *4,* 0 t glq'LL OOMIL NOIJ1311as I& * Gfld R go 4jRd sR pamollp aq TTS4S 40T bUTUOZ P UO bUTPTTnq jRdT0UTjd quo -4RI44 9.10m ql9T4m v go as�0 9q4 UT �jaoxa 'lq�O�J:ZS'Tp buTuOz R uT 40T bUTUOZ Aug uO Pa4eOOT aq TT-ells`5UTPTTnq pTed;T'OUT�d a I m 1. 0 U� 4qq a -Toa 4014 *-40rI T9-pU8PTs6U e UO sbUTPITng jo jec[mmN,, SP peaj puv aq !a94jRUTI.8J9U TTRtls D'VOE'VT UOT409S PTVS Q4SRm0TTo0J q4 SUOTST&o.xd 4u9md0T9A9G 4Tul POuueTd acid, a9pun aan4onal4s aTdTOUTad OUO UPLP 9JOM 9APT4 4PtI4 S40-[ jQT-4U9PTS9a-,U0U bUT - .p'nT'OUT Aq papuulle a jaq4jnj Aqaaatj Si 1paPU9MP Se 0: VOC"VT UOT40as qetll HMO MOIl3lqs :SIONIqqI 'AINnOD XOOD '10adSOUd INnOK ao aDVqqIA LqHl aO SaalSfUL aO UUVOS GNV IN21CIISaUd ala AS ClaNIYGHO ,LI aEl tole 0 4 1 to V, *ON 30 NIGH Ch. 14 Page 2 I'D. Regulations for Specific Accessory Structures and Uses 6.a. Location. Swimming pools shall be located entirely behind the real line of the building of the principal structure on the lot in the R-1, R -A, R-2, and R -X Districts. Swimming pools shall not be permitted in any required front, side or exterior side yards. Pools are permitted to encroach into the rear yard provided a minimum of fifteen (15) feet is maintained from the rear property line to the edge of the structure." SECTION FIVE: That Section 14.306.E as amended, is hereby further amended by addressing permitted obstructions in required yards; so that Section 14.3,06.E.2, Section 14.306.E.31 and Section 14.306.E.6 shall hereinafter be and read as follows: IIE. Permitted, obstructions in Required Yards. These structures shall be allowed to encroach into the required yards, as follows: 2. Eaves, storm gutters, chimneys and bay windows extending, into such yards not more than twenty-four (24) inches, however, in no case shall any such obstruction be located within twelve inches (1211) of a property lineal' 3. Patios, balconies, wood decks, swimming pools and handicapped ramps may encroach in the required rear yard; provided a minimum setback of fifteen (15) feet is maintained between the rear property line and the near edge of the structure, and that no structure Is located over or upon an easement. Handicapped ramps may encroach into 50% of a required sideyard. 6. Central air conditioning units shall be located on the rear elevation of any principal structure. If the unit connot be reasonable placed on the rear elevation because of operational reasons, such unit may be placed in up to twenty-five percent (25%) of a required sideyard, provided such location does not result in exhaust discharge upon any adjoining building or vegetation. Documentation verifying that the unit cannot be located at the rear of the structure shall be submitted by the air conditioning installer and approved by the Director of Planning. A screening plan which included fencing or landscaping must be submitted with the permit and approved by the Director of Planning." SECTION SIX,: That Section 14.31,0.0 as amended, is hereby, further 1 ing temporary classrooms f or up to one, year and amended, by perm tt "#ction renumbering the ordinance; so that Section, 14.31O.C.1a and, Se 1,,4.310,,,C.2 shall hereinafter be and read as follows: Temporary trailers or facilities f or approved construction projects are permitted, subject 'to the 4' * standards of the Building Code* Such facilities shall be located to conform with the applicable setback requirements of i ordinance. Theli facilities shall be removed upon completion of the construction project. Ch. 14 Page 3 2. Temporary trailers use as classrooms or similar uses that are ancillary to an existing school use are permitted for up to one year. Such facilities shall be located to conform with the applicable setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance." SECTION SEVEN: That Section 14.402.B as amended,, is hereby further amended by allowing the additional expansion of nonconforming structures into the established setback so 'that Section 14.402.B shall hereinafter be and read as follows: 1114.402. Nonconforming Buildings and Structures. B. Enlargement,Repair, Alterations and Replacement. Any nanconforming building, or structure May be enlarged, IR' repaired •,or altereld), provided that no such enlargenent,r maintenance repa, lteration shall I ir or a i either areate an additional nonconformity or 'increase the extent of the existing nonconformity. However,, on ,lots fifty-five feet (5511) or less in width, a nonconformint bung or stru)cture may be extended with the established 0 setback in a required rear yard or sideyard, provided that suoh, nonconformity is no mo that fifty percent of the required setback." SECTION EIGHT: That Section 14-1702 as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the Section 14.1702.45 "Parking lots and structures" as a permitted use in this Section. SECTION NINE: That Section 14.2215 as amended, is hereby further amended by permitting circular driveways only as a Conditional Use; so that Section 14.2215.A.1 shall hereinafter be and read as follows: Ill. Number. One driveway may be permitted per lot,, with a maximum of, one (1) curb -cut onto the street pavement per driveway. Circular or du,al frontage driveways may be permitted only by Conditional Use." SECTION TEN: That Section 14.2217 as amended is hereby, further I It amended by permil tti ng off -street parking, within 10,1 of 'the property line in non-residentioal zoning districts* so that Section 14.2217 shall hereinafter be and read as �fol,lows,*, 1114.2217. In Yards. Off-street parking shall conform to the following standards: A. Residential Districts. Off-street parking shall meet the required setbacks of the specific district. B. Non -Residential Districts. Off-street parking shall be permitted within, ten feet of the property line unless ad)acent to single family residential districts, Off-street parking shall be prohibited in required, yards that are adjacent to single family residential districts.11 Ch. 14 Page 4 SECTION ELEVEN: That Section 14.2308.E. as amended, is hereby further amended by requiring all four sides of refuse disposal areas to be screened; so that Section 14.2308.E. shall hereinafter be and read as follows: 11E. Screening of Refuse Disposal Areas. All refuse disposal areas shall be screened, on all four sides by a solid wood fence or an, equivalent screening material to a height of six (6) feet." SECTION TWELVE: That Section 14.2401 entitled "Definons" of Chapter 14 of the Village Code., as amendadi, is hereby furthel amended to include in proper alphabetical sequence the following; so that Section 14.2401 shall hereinafter be and read, as follows: lan "SIGHT TRIANGLE: No improvements shall, be placedr nor, plant, matez , i,als allowed i within the sighi tri'Langl,e so as to obstruct or limit the sight distance of, notoristso, Such, a, tricngle shall have legs Mew twenty-five feet (251) along the rights-of-way line when two (2) streets "intersect and ten, feet (101) along the right-of-way'll"nie and the driveway edge when a, street, an( a driveway 'intersect. The maximum, heighl of any obstruction shall be three feet, (31) within the sight triangle, unless otherwise permitted by the Municipa. Code." SECTION TiELVE: That this ordinance shall be in fullforce and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. r4yj ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1994. Gerald. L. Farley Village President V ,e lma W. Lowe Deputy Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT 411 Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS9 VILLAGE MANAGER 'FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY, JR., DIRECTOR OF PLANNING DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1994 SUBJECT: NEXTEL ANTENNA STRUCTURE Per your request I have attached copies of all materials previously sent to the Board for the Nextel communications tower. This item has been put on the September 20 Village Board agenda for reconsideration per the request of Trustee Hendricks. Please forward this information to the Village Board for their review and discussion at the next Village Board meeting. 'UOI.lt'PUQURUOOOJ oAiz!sod viojp0PQ0U St SQjOAjnoj jo wnwtuitu v 41OA2MOq 'isanbaj aw ;*Aojd& s[nddVjo pmog Suruoz aqj I -EjV i( o 010. .0 A El 'JaIXON Ul p IS SMIYLO Oq SE 21OA;Dql WOg JjaSWl pagqvnbsip uouuvq -in *isanbaj aqj uo uoissnosip AqjSuol v plaq sRddVjo pmog Sul 0 0 ouOz OqJL oql 01 posoddo silpis '�"j oL ol. poonpai aq it IRT sPuQuRuOOQx PUR .12moi aqijo iqg!oq posodoid' weun ivnsLk s -IQAOA'OH d 1! OlIeSPROU 01 USIS;Dp iomoi lodouow atp pogWEu aAvq siouoppad aqj jqj polumpul aH 011V IMBUT 4 U * :DOI V SUIP119 UO SqlUO1U IV10AOS .1oj snuoTmad oqj til. .41om uooq svqjpls 19T POMT.Pul, OH -ijodajjpls 041 pazuvuRuns cjautm1cj,,oq '* In ;ASjOj Avu ArIa.1 v St joAiol sr -slamoi joqjo WAOS_ 01 11011VIS .qj Imp pue vam osvol qo aEp tl� 41OM40U 170EII ol stn SI'UO!Itl-"'%Ol M&oj(lIrip pa1V:31Pu!OH 'SIVOS SIT PUB FMaNjo fjoisr a, =qW g1p q jopq rQAVS PUR ASOJOU40al auoqd rejtSt nMffao OtP POzu.m=ns Auaonv(I *IN Iow oq 111m sjoeqj p/ as lip pur palal;;p'UaOq OAvq suopluvApomnboi ;,eq; pajeotput Auat.1,8nra -4ij, -isanbai aqj paivasard kpa,qS'nea llo=a ,1W Sm vw s°no2111 IV 17661171 AinfJO.'Bunaaw sluaddVjo pnog guruoZ repods' aqj IV Pamomal mi isanbai aqjL -ainioruls (joss an Em qltruwnur paiunow-punoig joqj OZ I v Pn=o,o ol SuRoas a1v sratioppod oqj ',Xlre:)g!oodS -peo)f purg mg, 10, joj ;S jvUop.jpuO3 V.10j isonbaj v uo uoilz uounuo,aajj,' I p 10T uollEiop!suo:) inoA loj slitusurii sIroddVjo Pnog SumoZ aqjL Gvolf (INVU isva 101 :NOILLvaol SIOMPIM 90 XWS IUMS "P6-A-Z£ft'V9Z 't6-flD-1C-V8Z :joarims t66 "9Z A11U :UvG f)N'KNV'cl do U0103W(l "W 'A3W00J T INVIPIMAt WOUA Raf)VKVIN 30V IMA 'SINONVf *a laVHDIW 0 *01 S.1ou'lli li:)adsojj junoW JLN3WJLHVJ3a!)�amNvpi(i JLDgdSOHd JLNf)0W 90 99VIIIA . '!t'Wo +�iR .moi t LM - v ` &^GO4 upftouu 1 !fit'-eOP7 r* ACV '.�il%4%tI GATE Lel' MI _ V N LWK qv4m I# O_ AND A # l UM GumOmM Tr Q 4 01 co V- 9 W V.. z M � MOCK U-1 TO 044%:M " � �► Ltt5Tfi'r MC46 F st z M AL. MI _ V N LWK qv4m I# O_ AND A # l UM GumOmM Tr Q 4 01 co V- 9 W V.. z M 40 FW .'000, "ooe TAIL 'Acir/ayfT 5 otr: 5''C' is r -Of GYG[.rsNui t r G)' W -r Bir. rAvfI -- =z_ xT" t Y MASONRY - STORY MASONRY BLDG. 462.72'.. �� t IT s = a a t-- �� ZZs E Fo z7 - V F:�e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-3I-CU-94, ZBA-32-V 94 Hearing Date: July 14, 1994 PETMONER: Darrel Doug" SMR of Wxis 1051 Perimeter Schaumburg, IL SUBJECT PROPERTY: 101 East Rand Road PUBLICATION DATE: Pubfthed in the NortfMost Honkid on Junia 2e, 1994 REQUEST: The p f in order to o *,Mft touter an sacessory bLiOW 1. A Cord,5orW Use as required in SOCOM 14..1703 a mounted aro 70 feet in 2. A vwkftnto 14-306.4 to slow ana * e will a9 sepwalon *0 M, ae osd of ed 10 3. A to Secdon 14.; ., , am 4000SOtry aca row yard sW back of 4 on socis 1aa� ob i �, e %011h a _ setback of 2 sd of to mWmwn requirsd Ofkc MEMBERS PRESENT: Ronald Casolidy, Peter Lahr , Jock V, Leo Fknw Lmrern ABSENT: Gilbert Sasnik Robert w OBJECTORSJINTERESTED PARTIES: done Vice Chairman, C M cowZBA-31 U- , -�" order to a ;acse° : 1 i. ACorddonalUse as required In Se 14.1703 ,to dma t ox '70 Z Averiedw to UCOW 4,306.4 to 050W on $00088M structu,r4 with a 9 foot from to o instead of ft. 10 and 3. A variation to Se � 14.306.C2 anw a e structuirs with are d setback of 4 feet an d an accessory structuiro with a We yardsetwok to 2 in0oad of the minimum required 6 feet Darrel Dougherty,, SMR of ala of Nextel ry CommuricsWoo,101 P mer Drtve, Srhoumbwo, IL introduced if and noted Mr. John McM � PAL, ardtod WA W. Randy Stephenson, landlord's representative were also present Mr. Daugherty noted that their application would be amended. They are elm ttte roquest far the separation between an accessory structure and a principal structure. In addition, the rear yard setback has been increased from 4 feet to 5 feet. They are also requesting the 2 foot setback on the vide setback due to the overhang of the antennas. Mr. Daugherty said ESMR stands for Enhanced Special<zed Moble Racfio. SMR licenses operate in the same 800 megahurts, frequency bands as do Cellular, etc. SMR has been around for several years. Mat Nextel is doing is to" e)dsting specialized mobile radio frequencies and applying Motorola digital technolM to them. Nextel is a national carrier. He explained ownership by several corporstiom._. including Motorola and MCI. He explained how and where the system operates now end in the future. They are asking for a 120 foot communications tower which is the lowest height possible. He described the type of tower that will! be used and said the same type of tower is press ex*dng at the Glenview Municipal facility. It is approximately 100 feet. The antenna will be painted a soft white . They also requesting a 200 square foot prefabricated equipment room where the digital radio equipment will be stored. No onaits persoveW are required for the site. Periodic maintenance occurs once or twice s month. Mr. Cassidy asked to what a u ge would this project be too the ge of Mount Prospect. Mr. Daugherty exphMerd. He responded that wirolm communication *, are expanding througtaA, the nation and the world. The FCC late in 1993 came up with a policy statement that it wanted to add up to, but notmited tQ four to rbc new of a communicatIons in eachgeogrophical market Currently there two, and we can expect to w a minimum of two to four more in the coming years. W1h respect to the public service element, Nextel is seeing a reduction in price levels, in Los Angelos dw to increased competition. Service ods in Los are 25 per cent lower Om some of the compedtors and as a result the compo are decreasingtheir By more competition, we will see Ow price of the O Also, if you look at the paging example, the prices are much lower than yean, ago. The broadcast area were discussed bdudhg the tact that it Mmit Pr * q seamless, coverage. Vice Chairman C ;saidy asked why they need the Rand Road location. Mr. Dae g ty o0okwd it Is a reason, They are sent in a very specific geogmphkxd bcation from their radio f egwcy vVineering department . The department that they would ike less than a ono, quavtor mile type radita in a certain area to maximize the efficiency of the system. He referred to a map the requested location and noted It ial for the o*m to be boated in Mount Mr. Verhawlt mentioned, use by ft cab companies, tuck fleeft, etc Mr. Daugherty sW that ' be one aspect olthe, service,but it is consumer relotet There W11111 be v of appkatiors. Vft the digital system, the applications are endear. This rydem is dligital from the 9rourW up. It is of the art Motorola eq*ment and handsets. It is considered the nex1gonerstion of v*oless communication. Ray Forsythe, Planner, then summarized the staff report for the Z Board of Appeals and conckmied that staff would recommend doriail of the proposal based on mm, of the Phwrkq, Department and all other Wage Departments. Mr. Lannon osW what Is to twVt of the water tower at Rardust Ray Forsythe roplod, Hest it Is, abet 100 feet.. RanduW16 into procossof IV the elimination of the avatar towrar. There wn d � eb&A I* oft selection pwm.. The presort rife appears to be the best location ovabbilo. Mr. Verba if to 120 foot to w or to the resid`derrtial area is an eye two, concern, or is k a rado wave communication problem. Mr. Forsythe said staff is softfied that the radio waves two VA not be any disrWtlon of any household type utftes; it is more the seathetics of the 120 foot tower tw Is, a COMM. Ms. Luxem asked how close the nearest residential area is. Mr. Fonrythe repkd it is WW*1 250 feet of *0 south, a multi-family development. Mr. Cassidy questioned the height variation. Mr. Daugherty said they have worked for many months to come up with a plan and elaborated on how their plan compares to other communities, . g Glen, and a om'" glefamily residential areas where tower are located. He also dewted� ew hoot e was "ori about the typeOf tower to be wed and, ft y rloW k*gom where their towers, are already located. He discumd the pubk undemtarx*Vsnd,n**dr ft service. After dumnion, it wn decided there was no conflict " or inter ferenCO from OtfW UnVWS. wtWO pedgmer WOW be In mom, the would000rdh, ate wfth tavern and provide ftwft of ea ch . differe�rrt f equerde r and channels, SEC all of Owes fre � � � , ��� me of fie encieer to be ire there a no pot l fin or terfwwo. Tree w avoid household in, terference.in,A to " n wotdd be a Mw prob4orn. mW, o, of the Stu, Cturewas dis Mowevor, Montenanco expected, Thwo Is no required. There y petiftwo � � . � a e* , ,k� ed b The map d by p*Mkxwe�rner � a �e o F aand locationwero Nk. Lannon d him"N from the arse because of stack in Nexel, . C d pedtianer eareed that he would wltttdrraeww the for setbacks. The only reqwst is for the 120 foot tower. f4r. C ed thet Owl rowellst 4 fors Con , W 'Use as required in SocOm 14.1 703.20'to slow �' i feetvariate are r**del bei peNoner has arrr�ded r ro � to surd 1 The e be painted a soft . . Verhawlt moved and Ms. l uxern seconded the mo Ion to approve. Upon Rai Cad: AYES: Verhassil Luxem, Cassidy NAYS: Floros Tto motion was approved by a vote of 3-1. However, a MWftWM of for a p osNive recommettdatkn. The Wage Board A need a v4pw majoay to,approv*#* rel;. R submitted, a Rr#yF=jwI FROM; DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT,, ADDRESS: LOCATION MAP: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, GEL BASNI]Kt CHAIRMAN f7 V RAY P. FORSYTHEt PLANNER114 JUNE 23, 1994 ZBA-31-CU-949 ZBA-32-V-94 SMART SMR OF ILLINOIS 101 EAST RAND ROAD 0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 10, ZONING; B-3, COMMUNITY SHOPPING LOTSIZE. 331992 Sq. Ft. %COVERAGE: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The petitioners are requesting the following in order to construct a radio tower with an accessory building: A Conditional Use, as required in Section 14.1703.20, to allow a ground -mounted antenna tower which exceeds 70 feet in height. 2. A variation to Section 14.306.4 to allow an accessory structure with a 9 foot separation from the principal structure instead of the minimum required 10 feet; and 3. A variation to Section 14.306.0.2 to allow an accessory structure with a rear yard setback of 4 feet and an accessory structure with a sideyard setback of 2 feet instead of the minimum. required 6 feet. 1110 'lull, 0XION, 4, W-5 MW Summary of Application: The application 'indicates the desire to construct and operate a wird communications facility. The project consists of a 200 square foot radio equipment shelter and a 12D foot tall monopole antenna. The application also indicates the 120 foot height his necessary to meet specific coverage objectives. Impact on Surrounding Properties: Site History f -- In 1978, the property owner was granted a Special Use Permit to operate an auto garage, service station and the tire center. In 1981, the property owner amended the Special Use Permit to allow more than one principal use on the property. The additional uses include an auto parts store, an auto repair shop and the service station. The petitioners are now seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 120 foot tan monopole tower. The proposal would also "include a 10' x 20' equipment room an 8 foot concrete block wall along the rear and side of the area and a 7 foot wrought iron fence along the front. The qW proposal would be located to the rear of the existing one-story masonry building. The Zoning Ordinance allows towers which exceed 70 feet only with a Conditional Use Permit. The variations are required in order to permit the building and tower to be located within the required setbacks. Staff would note that the property owner also owns the adjacent vacant property to the west. He could eliminate the need for the requested variations by adjusting the lot line between the two properties. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 The petitioners are proposing a 120 foot high tower which will be used for a digital conununications system. The only antenna structure in Mount Prospect that exceeds the requested height, is the 250 foot tall TCI type tower on their property in the Kensington Center. 'There are no towers which are similar to that which is requested. There are structures which are 120 feet or higher (Water towers, Commonwealth, Edison power lines). The First Chicago Bank and 1699 Wafl,Street bui1dings are both approximately 100 feet in height. The petitioners have modified the design of their tower in order to make less, �of an, inpact. The an ti enria Isdesigned to look Eke a typical light pole and shields have been, propo, sed to screen the nine panel antenna. Although the petitioner has attempted tonuitigate the impact of this structure, staff does not feel that 120 foot antenna is appropriate isuch closepro, imqty to a, residentiiall area,. The site plan, indicates that the tower,and accessory)buildling will, be,locged to the �rear of the exi$6ng building. The area wi'M beenclosed by a wrought itron fence 7 feet high along the,front, of t1be building. An 8 foot concrete block wall similar to theexisding building wiH be congructed along th� side and rear of the site. The Zoning Ordinance aHows 8floot fences to screw storage areas. Star would also note that there is a 7 foot high chain fink, fence with barbed We .cat ode the storage area near the tower. The Zoning Ordinance requiresthat all barbedwvie used for secunty, reasons be approved by the VRIage Board,, The petitioners should be prepared to discuss the necessity of the barbed wire at the Wage Board meeting. The variationsare neces=y in order !to allow the prefab buflding and tower to be located within thl- It required setbacks. Becausethe property owner also owns the parcel to the wes4 allotfine adjustment I- t ible s possi Staff, would recommend derlial of the variations and would suggest, the property owner 0 4ust the lotfine between his two properties to bfingthe request wifluin Code requiremen ts. Engineering indicated that any access easement should berecorded prior to the completion of the project. Also, drahigewith"m the storage mu will need to be addressed with .0 parts Public Works # " per= indicates that there is a waternuun in the easement along the south property line and,care shouldbe given when inAdUng the fence. Inspection Services indicates that foundationplans, forthe concrete block wall and the tower wiII, be required and must be signed and sealed by a Amctural engmieer- The petitioners are requesting a Conditional Use Permit with variations in order to construct and ,Operate a 120 foot radio tower and accessory building. Staff would recommend that the petitioner reduce the height of the tower to 70 feet to meet Village Code req,wrements. In addition, it is recommended that the owner adjust the lot line between his two properties to eliminate then eed for ,setback variations. UUW-.A