HomeMy WebLinkAbout6. MANAGERS REPORT 10/3/06
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 26, 2006
~b.M
'O/~ lOb
TO:
VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM:
WATER/SEWER SUPERINTENDENT
SUBJECT: SEALED BID RESULTS FOR BOOSTER STATION 4 RESERVOI
ROOF REPLACEMENT ($117,600)
BACKGROUND
As part of the Village's ongoing annual inspections of water tanks and reservoirs, Dixon
Engineering of Hales Corner, Wisconsin was hired to inspect the interior and exterior of the
810,000 gallon water reservoir located at 117 North Waverly Place. Deficiencies found were:
improper and deteriorating flashing, roofing system failures including leaking in areas around the
entry points and water ponding after rain. Dixon Engineering recommended that the existing
bituminous roof be replaced. Dixon also identified minor pit pipe painting work needed and that
work will be combined with a future tank painting project. The reservoir at Booster Station 4
was last repaired in 1997 and the reservoir roof was also replaced in 1997. The Village retained
the services of a roofing architect, Hutchinson Design Group of Barrington, Illinois, to review
the recommendations and to prepare the design specifications for the roofing work.
BID RESULTS
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 A.M. on September 26, 2006 for the Roof Replacement at
Reservoir 4. Six invitational bids were mailed and a bid notice was placed in the local paper.
Six (6) contractors obtained bid packages. Three (3) bids were received:
Bidder
Sullivan Roofing, Mount Prospect
Bid Price
$112,600
All American Exterior, Lake Zurich
$150,416
Bennett & Brosseau, Romeoville
$153,200
American Roofing, West Chicago
Knickerbocker Roofing, Harvey
Van Doorn Roofing, Elk Grove Village
No Bid
No Bid
No Bid
Page two
SEALED BID RESULTS FOR BOOSTER STATION 4RESERVOIR 4 ROOF REPLACEMENT ($117,600)
September 26, 2006
DISCUSSION
The work includes removing the existing bituminous roofing material and correcting drainage
issues before placing a rubber membrane roof down. The existing two roof hatches will be
replaced and a membrane roof will be applied to the surface with recycled rubber walk mats
added over a stone/pea gravel surface to allow for maintenance and inspection of the roof and
reservoir as needed. The work will take two weeks to complete with the expectation that the
reservoir does not have to be drained. In addition to the roof recover, the work will include
adding two confined space entry equipment mounts that will be installed into the existing
concrete reservoir structure before the membrane roof is placed. These floor mounts will allow
public works staff to use davit-type confined space hoists for the safe entry into the reservoir for
inspections or other maintenance. The new roof membrane will have an extended 20-year full
system warranty; not the typical pro-rated warranty.
In addition, staff is recommending a contingency of $5,000 be added to the award for any minor
wood, concrete or other repairs that may be needed after the existing roof is removed and
prepared for the membrane roof.
Although Sullivan Roofing has not performed work for the Village in the past, our roofing
consultant, Hutchinson Design Group, has previously worked with Sullivan and highly
recommends their work.
RECOMMENDA TION
I recommend that the Village Board accept the lowest qualified bid for Booster Station 4
Reservoir Roof Replacement work as submitted by Sullivan Roofing of Mount Prospect, Illinois
in an amount not to exceed $117,600. Sufficient funds for this proposed expenditure exist in the
current budget. .,-~ ~
~Matt ~vereem ~-
Water & Sewer Superintendent
I concur:
/-J$~
Glen R. Andter
Director of Public Works
MO
cc: Director of Public Works Glen Andler
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM
CHF 06-186
CONTROL NUMBER
FROM:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
RICHARD EDDINGTON, CHIEF OF POLICE ,
~,
POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUEST TO ACCEPT STATE BID FOR PURC ;h:sd
OF ONE (1) 2007 FORD F350 4X2 CAB/CHASSIS @A COST OF $25,800.~
POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUEST TO WAIVE BID PROCESS AND
PURCHASE ONE (1) MAVRON THREE DOOR PRISONER TRANSPORT
MODULE (MODEL #PTM-84-1196-3) @ A COST OF $38,561.00
SEPTEMBER 27, 2006
TO:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
REQUEST TO PURCHASE ONE (1) FORD F350 4X2 CAB/CHASSIS.
Backaround Information on the Prisoner Transport Vehicle:
The department included funds in its 2006 C.I.P. request to purchase a prisoner transport
vehicle. The prisoner transport vehicle will be utilized primarily for the transportation of multiple
arrestees from the field to the Mount Prospect Police Department and from the Police
Department to the Third District Court Facility in Rolling Meadows. The department frequently
must transport two or more arrestees to Rolling Meadows or from arrest locations to the police
department. These prisoner movements often require two or more squad cars to accomplish the
transports resulting in a significant draw on the number of on-duty patrol personnel available for
911 call response within the community. The prisoner module selected will have a certified
maximum capacity of fifteen (15) occupants; however, the module realistically will hold thirteen
(13) adults. This specialty vehicle will also be deployed at large public events and will be used
to transport large numbers of department personnel in the event of a critical incident or when
conducting gang sweeps or saturation foot patrols in high crime areas.
This purchase marks the first such purchase of its kind for the police department.
Recommendation:
The department is recommending the purchase of one (1) Ford F350 4X2 Cab Chassis to serve
as the platform for the Mavron Prisoner Transport Module also being recommended for
purchase in this memorandum. The Ford F350 4X2 Cab Chassis is available in the platform
configuration necessary to support the Mavron Prisoner Transport Module recommended for
purchase from Morrow Brother's Ford in Greenfield, Illinois under a State of Illinois bid award
(#PSD4013453) at a cost of $25,800. We are requesting the Village Board authorize the
purchase of one (1) Ford F350 4X2 Cab Chassis from Morrow Brother's Ford at a total cost not
to exceed $25,800 under the State of Illinois contract. The State of Illinois contract was
awarded through a competitive bid process, and we are eligible to make purchases under the
contract provisions. Funds are available for this expenditure in capital improvement account
#5107701-660125, which is listed on page #285 of the 2006 Annual Budget. This vehicle, new
Page 1 of3
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM
CHF 06-186
CONTROL NUMBER
to the inventory, will first be drop-shipped to Mavron Corporation of Warsaw, Indiana for
prisoner module installation and has a projected final product delivery date of early spring 2007.
POLICE REQUEST TO WAIVE THE COMPETITIVE BID PROCESS AND PURCHASE ONE
MAVRON THREE DOOR PRISONER TRANSPORT MODULE.
The police department is requesting a waiver of the bid process and authorization to purchase a
Mavron three door Prisoner Transport Module, Model #: PTM-84-1196-3 using 2006 budget
funds.
Discussion:
Mavron Company, Inc. is the largest manufacturer of after-market prisoner transportation
systems in the nation. Their only competitors in this industry segment are the Havis Shields
Equipment Company of Warminister, Pennsylvania and American Aluminum Accessories of
Perry, Florida. Mavron, Incorporated, Havis Shield and American Aluminum Accessories, Inc.
do not participate in the Illinois State bid process. Staff found Havis Shield and American
Aluminum Accessories to have limited prisoner transport module offerings and their responses
to our requests for information and design proposals were incomplete.
Mavron, Inc. has been operating and located in Warsaw, Indiana for more than thirty years.
Their prisoner transportation module products are in wide use both locally and nationally. Some
of the law enforcement agencies currently employing Mavron prisoner transportation modules
locally include the Schaumburg, Des Plaines, Elk Grove, Hoffman Estates and Arlington Heights
Police Departments as well as the DuPage and Lake County Sheriff's Departments. The Lake
County Sheriff's Department uses Mavron, Inc. products exclusively and currently has several
Mavron, Inc. prisoner transportation module products in service.
Police department staff personally visited with each of these agencies to view their in-service
Mavron, Inc. products and to discuss quality and warranty service issues. In every instance,
Mavron, Inc. was reported to have built a high quality product that needed little in the way of
warranty service and when needed, warranty service was rendered consistent with published
warranty terms. Mavron products enjoy an excellent reputation for overall quality in the law
enforcement community. Further, Mavron, Inc. demonstrated responsiveness to staff requests
for information and worked in a timely fashion to design a prisoner transport module consistent
with the department's operational needs and budgetary limitations.
The Mavron, Inc. Prisoner Module, Model #PTM 84-1196-3 meets all of the department's design
specifications. Additionally, Mavron, Incorporated offers some design and safety features not
available on their competitors models that staff feels are essential for officer and prisoner safety;
including: manual safety restraint bars and bullet proof polycarbonate interior divider panels (for
increased front to rear visibility).
The Warsaw, Indiana location of the Mavron production facilities serves as a factory authorized
service center for all Mavron manufactured products. Access to a regionally based service
center for warranty work or repairs to the prisoner transport module as the result of damage is
essential.
Page 2 of3
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM
CHF 06-186
CONTROL NUMBER
Recommendation:
The police department recommends the Village Board waive the bid process and authorize the
police department to purchase a Prisoner Transport Module (Model #PTM-84-1196-3) from the
Mavron, Incorporated of Warsaw, Indiana at a total cost not to exceed $38,561.00. Funds in the
amount of $30,200 for this expenditure are available in capital improvement account #5107701-
660125, which is listed on page #285 of the 2006 Annual Budget. The additional funds needed
to cover the full cost of the prisoner transport module ($8,361.00) are available in capital
improvement account #5107701-660122 and will be transferred to capital improvement account
#5107701-660125 to cover the balance of the purchase price.
JD/jd
~~
Page 3 of3
!\ilount ProsPC(.:t
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2006
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF THE BIDDING PROCESS FOR THE PURCHASE OF ORI
EQUIPMENT PARTS TO FABRICATE A REPLACEMENT LEAF MACHINEr
($16,000.00)
Background
In the current budget, there are funds available to replace unit 4531. 4531 is a 1984 Tarco TTL-
1 vacuum leaf machine and is used by the Public Works Department Street/Buildings Division to
pickup leaves along highways and no curb streets during the Village Leaf Program.
Replacement Schedule
4531 was purchased in 1984. The vehicle/replacement schedule for leaf machines is 15-20
years. 4531 has entered its 23rd year of service. During the life of the unit, the unit has been
modified several times going from a beater wand to a suction hose only. The engine has been
rebuilt and/or replaced three times. The current engine is in its eighth year of operation and has
logged 2,112 hours of running.
Life Cvcle Cost Analvsis
Life cycle cost analysis has been not been calculated because of the short periods of time used
each year.
Other Factors
The Public Works Department has used the Tarco TTL-1 vacuum leaf machine (see attached
photo) with an air cooled engine since 1973. The Public Works Department operates two Tarco
TTL-1 vacuum leaf machines. The records show the Tarco TTL-1 originally had a water cooled
engine that repeatedly overheated and had a three year life before the engine had to be rebuilt.
The Village maintenance staff in 1973 changed the water cooled engines to the Wisconsin air
cooled engines on all the machines the Village owned at that time. To this day, the Wisconsin
air cooled engine is the staff's engine of choice.
The Village purchased its last new Tarco TTL-1 in 2004. In 2005 the Tarco TTL-1 vacuum leaf
machine was taken out of production and no new production unit has replaced it. I talked with
the president of Terrant Manufacturing the manufacturer of the Tarco TTL-1 and he told me that
they will continue to make replacement parts for several more years. The Village staff has been
looking at other vacuum leaf machines but none of them offer a Wisconsin air cooled engine or
have the same size discharge tube to fit the opening of the leaf box.
Subject: Waiver of the Bidding Process to purchase leaf machine parts
Date: September 27, 2006
Page 2 of 2
Since a new Tarco TTL-1 is not available to replace 4531 (1984 Tarco) unit the vehicle
maintenance staff is requesting to purchase Tarco TTL-1 replacement parts in order to fabricate
a replacement vacuum leaf machine. The Vehicle Maintenance Division will have this machine
ready for the 2007 Village Leaf Program.
The replacement vacuum leaf machine would have a new replacement life of 15-20 years.
Replacement Recommendation
It is my recommendation that original replacement parts be purchased to fabricate a
replacement vacuum leaf machine during the current 2006 budget year to replace unit 4531.
Recommendation
I am requesting the waiver of the bidding process for the purchase of Tarco TTL-1 Original
Replacement Parts to fabricate a new vacuum leaf machine.
I am recommending to purchase the Tarco TTL-1 original replacement parts from the local
Tarco authorized dealer Standard Equipment, Chicago, Illinois at a cost not to exceed
$16,000.00. Standard Equipment is the only supplier in the Chicago and Illinois area.
Funds for this proposed purchase are available in account 6707709-660115, in the amount of
$43,500.00, page 293, of the current budget. Funds remaining will be used to purchase from
local venders the necessary equipment (engine, lighting, steel for the trailer, and etc.) to make
the unit completely functional. The estimated total ~ost to fabricate the new unit is $31,000.00.
The unit being replaced will be stripped for spare parts and the remainder of the unit will be sent
for recycling.
Jg
Attachments
c:
Deputy Director of Public Works Sean Dorsey
H:\Administration\BIDS\RESUL TS\Leaf Machine 2006.doc
Mount Prospect
~
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
@)
TREE Cl'IY USA
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 27,2006
TO:
VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM:
FORESTRY/GROUNDS SUPERINTENDENT
SUBJECT:
BID RESULTS - HOLIDAY TREE LIGHTING - $33,000.00
BACKGROUND
Funding has been included in the 2006 budget for contractual installation, and later removal, of white
lights on selected trees in the downtown. We mailed out 23 sets of bid specifications for this work, and
placed a bid notice in the local paper. The specifications describe a two-year contract, although we
reserved the right not to renew the second year if we are not satisfied with the work done in year one.
BID RESULTS
Four bids were received.
Bidder
Bid results were as follows:
Cost to install and remove one strand
2006 2007
$ 8.41 $ 8.41
$ 9.89 $10.09
$10.00 $10.00
$12.62 $13.52
Temple Display
Arbor Team Plant Health Care
Able Painting
Winkler's Tree Service
DISCUSSION
The low bidder, Temple Display, has not worked for the Village before. However, they provided four
municipal references and all were highly favorable.
Based on past experience, we estimate that approximately 3565 strands will need installation this year.
Cost to install and later remove 3565 strands would amount to $29,981.65. However, we reserve the
right to increase the number of strands used to account for tree growth.
BID RECOMMENDATION
On p. 279 of the 2006 Budget, $38,427.00 remains in Account #0016104-540962 for White Light
Installation.
I recommend award of a two-year holiday lighting contract to the low bidder, Temple Display. Year one
(1) would be in an amount not to exceed $33,000.00. Year two (2) would be in the amount approved by
the Village Board for the 2007 Budget.
I concur:
H:\Forestry\Grounds\Word\2006\MEMO-HOLIDA Y LIGHTBID.DOT
, ~IOtmt 1>co,"pc<:t
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 27,2006
SUBJECT: ACCEPT STATE OF ILLINOIS BID FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE 20
FORD 2 WHEEL DRIVE CAB & CHASSIS ($26,500.00)
Backaround
In the current budget, there are funds available to replace unit 2712. 2712 is a 1990 Chevrolet
1-ton service truck with an underbody tow lift used by the Public Works Department Vehicle
Maintenance Division for hauling supplies, repairing vehicles on service calls and also towing
Village police/pool cars and Public Works pickup trucks.
Replacement Schedule
2712 was purchased in 1990.. The vehicle/equipment replacement schedule for 1-ton dump
trucks is 12 years or 50,000 miles. 2712 has met the years of service having entered it's 1th
year of service and has logged 36,808 miles.
Life Cvcle Cost Analvsis
Life cycle cost analysis has been completed for both 2712. The life cycle cost analysis is
attached for your review. The optimum economic replacement point for 2712 has been
calculated at year 9 and the modified economic replacement point for 2712 has been calculated
at year 12.
Other Factors
The vehicle being replaced was purchased prior to the Village Hall Parking Facility and the
Public Safety Facility being built. The way these facilities were built it is necessary to have an
underbody tow lift that will pick up a vehicle at a ninety degree angle to the driving isle. At the
present time it is necessary to send two mechanics to manually push the vehicle from the
parking stall and then hook it to the underbody tow lift. The new underbody tow lift will require
just one mechanic to perform the same service.
Another factor is the current unit is equipped with a gasoline engine and is light in the front end
when transporting a fully loaded Public Works pickup truck. The new vehicle will have a diesel
engine providing more weight in the front end needed to safely tow a pickup truck.
Replacement Recommendation
It is my recommendation that a replacement for 2712 be purchased during the 2006 budget
year.
Subject: Accept State of Illinois Bid For One 2-Wheel Drive Cab & Chassis
Date: September 27,2006
Page 2 of 2
Bid Recommendation
I am recommending the purchase of one (1) 2007 Ford F350 2-wheel drive, 13,000# GVWR,
cab and chassis per our specifications from the State of Illinois contract (PSD4013453) award
winner Morrow Brothers Ford, Inc., Greenfield, Illinois. I request that the Village Board authorize
the purchase of one (1) new 2007 Ford F350 2-wheel drive cab and chassis at a cost not to
exceed $26,500.00.
Funds for this proposed purchase are available in account 6707709-660115, in the amount of
$43,900.00, page 293, of the current budget. Funds remaining will be used to purchase the
necessary equipment to make the unit completely functional. The truck being replaced will be
sold at the fall 2007 Northwest Municipal Conference auction.
~E~~~
Glen R. And er
Director of Public Works
Jg
Attachment
c:
Deputy Director of Public Works Sean Dorsey
H:\Administration\BIDS\RESUL TS\Cab and Chassis 4X2 2006.doc
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for 1990 Chevrolet Service Body With Underbody Wheel Lift 2712
Year
2 3 4 5 6 7
22191 17753 16699 15645 14591 13537 12483
17753 16699 15645 14591 13537 12483 11429
4438 1054 1054 1054 1054 1054 1054
200 200 200 200 200 200 200
2.5 5.0 12.0 12.0 6.9 7.0 6.5
500 1000 2400 2400 1380 1400 1300
330 161 392 722 276 206 604
805 473 417 317 615 711 628
6276 2893 4475 4705 3532 3578 3792
6276 9169 13644 18349 21881 25459 29252
3800 6033 8002 9500 12404 15760 18723
Value at Beginning of Year:
Estimated Value at Year End:
Actual Dollar Depreciation for Year:
Downtime Costs/Mile:
Hours DownlYear:
Downtime Costs per Year:
Cost of Maintenance and Repairs per Year:
(including labor, parts, etc.)
Fuel Costs per Year:
Total Variable Costs:
Total Lifetime Variable Costs:
Miles:
Cumulative Cost per Mile:
(Divide Total Lifetime Variable Costs by Mileage)
.!! $2.50
i
:; $2.00
Q,
-
~ $1.50
0
~ $1.00
+:;
as
:i $0.50
E
::s $-
0
10 11 12 13 14 15
9321 8267 7213 6159 5105 4051
8267 7213 6159 5105 4051 2997
1054 1054 1054 1054 1054 1054
200 200 200 200 200 200
8.4 15.6 20.6 8.3 11.5 18.6
1680 3120 4120 1650 2300 3720
379 844 1475 688 876 1044
431 492 197 506 615 682
3752 5725 7067 4106 5057 6719
48958 54683 61750 65856 70913 77631
25047 27367 28299 30686 33589 36808
$ 1.95 $ 2.00 $ 2.18 $ 2.15 $ 2.11 $ 2.11
$ 1.65 $ 1.52 $ 1.71 $ 1.93 $ 1.76 $ 1.62 $ 1.56 $ 1.71
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Year
lri\,~Pfjl}Qtes GPlitilli'm~~l!OO1ji:i.R~m6,nt;:';::'f
l Modified Optimum Economic Replacement Point t
Modified Optimum Economic Replacement Point Analvsis
Purchase Price of New Vehicle:
LESS: Estimated Value of New Vehicle at Optimum Economic Replacement Point:
Estimated Depreciation Cost of New Vehicle:
LESS: Estimated Value of Present Vehicle:
Net Depreciation Cost of New Vehicle:
Estimated Total Miles on Replacement at Optimum Economic Replacement Point:
Estimated Depreciation Cost Cost/Mile of New Vehicle:
Existing Vehicle Cumulative Cost per Mile at Optimum at Optimum Economic Replacement Point:
ADD: Estimated Depreciation Cost/Mile of New Vehicle:
Cumulative Cost Per Mile at Modified Optimum EconomIc Replacement:
$43,990
$31,500
$12,490
$2,997
$9,493
23,000
$0.41
$1.77
$0.41
$2.18
lvlollnt Prospect
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT
TO: VilLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2006
SUBJECT: ACCEPT STATE OF ILLINOIS BID FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO
FORD 4 WHEEL DRIVE CAB & CHASSIS ($58,400.00)
Backaround
In the current budget, there are funds available to replace unit 2716 and 2742. Both trucks are
1997 Chevrolet 1-ton dump trucks used by the Public Works Department Street/Buildings
Division for hauling small loads of material, supplies and equipment to job sites throughout the
Village. Both trucks are equipped with snow and ice removal equipment. These trucks are used
during snow removal operations to clear snow from public buildings, Village parking facilities,
and downtown business district.
Replacement Schedule
2716 and 2742 were purchased in 1997. The vehicle/equipment replacement schedule for 1-ton
dump trucks is 12 years or 50,000 miles. 2716 and 2742 have entered their 10th year of service
with 2716 having logged 40,752 miles and 2742 logging 25,466 miles.
life Cvcle Cost Analvsis
Life cycle cost analysis has been completed for both 2716 and 2742. The life cycle cost analysis
is attached for your review. The optimum economic replacement point for 2716 has been
calculated at year 6 and the modified economic replacement point for 2716 has been calculated
at year 8. The optimum economic replacement point for 2742 has been calculated at year 3
and the modified economic replacement point for 2742 has been calculated at year 6.
Other Factors
These trucks have been moved up for replacement due to the problems with the General
Motors 6.5L diesel engines. Both trucks had the fuel injection pump and fuel injection module
replaced twice and 2742 has had the pump replaced three times. General Motors has
recognized the problem and has provided a 11 year/120,OOO mile warranty on the injector
pump, but have not made the fuel injector pumps more reliable. With the warranty running out in
March 2008 we have moved the replacement up to 2006 so the vehicles being replaced can be
sold at the 2007 NWMC auction. By replacing the vehicles this year they will still have warranty
coverage and still have retail value when they are sold in fall of 2007.
Another factor is the clearing of snow from the top floor of the Village Hall Parking Facility.
These trucks will be equipped with a lower profile dump body and emergency lighting to
facilitate easy access to the upper deck without having to remove the emergency lighting when
it is necessary to haul snow from the parking facility.
Subject: Accept State of Illinois Bid For Two 4-Wheel Drive Cab & Chassis
Date: September 27,2006
Page 2 of 2
Replacement Recommendation
It is my recommendation that replacements for 2716 and 2742 be purchased during the 2006
budget year.
Bid Recommendation
I am recommending the purchase of two (2) 2007 Ford F350 4-wheel drive, 13,000# GVWR,
cab and chassis per our specifications from the State of Illinois contract (PSD4013453) award
winner Morrow Brothers Ford, Inc., Greenfield, Illinois. I request that the Village Board authorize
the purchase of two (2) new 2007 Ford F350 4 wheel drive cab and chassis at a cost not to
exceed $58,400.00.
Funds for this proposed purchase are available in account 6707709-660115, in the amount of
$91,400.00, page 293, of the current budget. Funds remaining will be used to purchase the
necessary equipment to make the unit completely functional. The trucks being replaced will be
sold at the fall 2007 Northwest Municipal Conference auction.
~
Jg
Attachments
c:
Deputy Director of Public Works Sean Dorsey
H:\Administration\BIDS\RESUL TS\Cab and Chassis 4X4 2006.doc
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for 19971.Ton Dump Truck 2716
1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10
25000 23100 21200 19300 13600 11700 9800 7900
23100 21200 19300 17400 11700 9800 7900 6000
1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
2.5 25 21.25 32 23.5 29.5 22.5 16
500 5000 4250 6400 4700 5900 4500 3200
37 1160 717 2275 460 2161 415 1120
Year
Value at Beginning of Year:
Estimated Value at Year End:
Actual Dollar Depreciation for Year:
Downtime Costs/Hour:
Hours DownfYear:
Downtime Costs per Year:
Cost of Maintenance and Repairs per Year:
(including labor, parts, etc.)
Fuel Costs per Year:
329
Total Variable Costs:
2766
Total Lifetime Variable Costs:
2766
Miles:
1002
Cumulative Cost per Mile:
(Divide Total Lifetime Variable Costs by Mileage)
$
2.76 $
$3.00
~ $2.50
==
..
t. $2.00
~
() $1.50
~
i $1.00
::I
E
a $0.50
$-
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
YEAR
691
945
997
642
756
1024
1112
8751
7812
11572
7702
10717
7839
7332
11516
19328
30900
55512
66229
74068
81400
4882
10188
15786
21481
29636
33365
36960
40752
2.36 $
1.90 $
1.96 $
$
1.87 I $
1.98 I $
1.71
2.00 $
2.00
I Denotes Modified Optimum Economic Replacement. I
I~~t::r; .>!jO~RQt~,~QpVmUlnE@'Wii~Repl~m~W;' .,',
Modified Optimum Economic Replacement Point Calculation
Purchase price of new vehicle:
Less: estimated value of new vehicle at Replacement:
Estimated depreciation of new vehicle:
Less: estimated value of present vehicle:
Net depreciation cost of new vehicle:
Estimated total miles on replacement vehicle at Replacement:
Estimated increase in new vehicle cost per mile
Cumulative cost per mile of present vehicle at Optimum Replacement:
Add: estimated increase in new vehicle cost/mile:
Cumulative cost per mile at Modified Optimum Replacement:
45,700
35,000
10,700
6,000
4,700
26,000
0.18
1.73
0.18
1.91
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for 19971-Ton Dump Truck 2742
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
25000 23100 19300 17400 15500 13600 11700 9800 7900
23100 21200 17400 15500 13600 11700 9800 7900 6000
1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
6 28 17 29 29.75 18 29 29
1200 5600 3400 5800 5950 3600 5800 5800
44 1855 517 770 1303 1001 405 1114
Year
Value at Beginning of Year:
Estimated Value at Year End:
Actual Dollar Depreciation for Year:
Downtime Costs/Hour:
Hours DownfY ear:
Downtime Costs per Year:
Cost of Maintenance and Repairs per Year:
(including labor, parts, etc.)
Fuel Costs per Year:
358
Total Variable Costs:
3502
Miles:
Total Lifetime Variable Costs:
1091
3502
Cumulative Cost per Mile:
(Divide Total Lifetime Variable Costs by Mileage)
$
3.21 $
471
575
606
593
213
276
912
9930
6288
9076
9746
6714
8381
9726
23882
30170
39246
48992
55706
64086
73812
10528
13172
16575
20213
21389
22356
25466
$
2.27 $
2.29 I $
2.69
2.37 I $
2.42 $
2.60 $
2.87 $
2.90
$3.50
.!! $3.00
i
.. $2.50
GI
11.
- $2.00
III
0
(J
GI $1.50
>
i
'S $1.00
E
::s
(J $0.50
$-
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
YEAR
~"">'l"I'Sii1""f"'>.m"W'F\"1i""""""~""I"'Bl'..I..'.'....."'r"'.'..>.,.,.,~
0:Vg[d%j0ff~I~\~jL>,.,.".,~!~"p:lUm:'.:."...,m~j~m~r.t\.lmY,B%.iT;',','!;j;;;"
I Denotes Optimum Economic Replacement. I
Modified Optimum Economic Replacement Point Calculation
Purchase price of new vehicle:
Less: estimated value of new vehicle at Replacement:
Estimated depreciation of new vehicle:
Less: estimated value of present vehicle:
Net depreciation cost of new vehicle:
Estimated total miles on replacement vehicle at Replacement:
Estimated increase in new vehicle cost per mile
Cumulative cost per mile of present vehicle at Optimum Replacement:
Add: estimated increase in new vehicle cost/mile:
Cumulative cost per mile at Modified Optimum Replacement:
45,700
36,500
9,200
6,000
3,200
7.300
0.44
1.87
0.44
2.31
Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 28, 2006
TO:
VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS
FROM:
PROJECT ENGINEER
SUBJECT:
2006 BRIDGE REHABILITATION PROJECT - GEORGE STREET BRIDGE
FINAL BALANCING CHANGE ORDER - $17,799.00
Village Staff is requesting approval to pay Martam Construction Inc., contractor of the 2006 Bridge
Rehabilitation Project, $17,799.00 above the contract amount. The contract amount is $196,359.00 and
the final construction cost is $214,158.00.
Background
The George Street Bridge was the only bridge included in this year's Bridge Rehabilitation Project. The
project involved deck replacement, abutment wall and beam repairs, and channel stabilization beneath the
bridge. Also included in the project was the replacement of the deteriorated bank stabilization measures
100' upstream and downstream of the bridge. Martam Construction Inc. of Elgin, Illinois was the low
bidder and was awarded the project for $196,359.00. The work began in July and the bridge was
reopened to traffic shortly after Labor Day in September.
Construction
The scope of this year's bridge project involved many different construction items. As part of the design,
the Village's engineering consultant, Ciorba Group Inc., determined the estimated quantities for each of
the construction items. During construction, more areas of the bridge were revealed that required
additional work. As a result, decisions were made that increased the quantity above the estimated amount
for a few items. This was done to ensure the safety of the public and to avoid having to make additional
repairs in the near future. Also, where possible, an amount less than estimated was used for a few items.
At the end of the project, there was an increase in the amount of$17,799.00 above the contract amount.
With this additional work, we do not expect to perform significant repairs to the bridge for at least the
next 15-20 years. Sufficient Village funds are available for the additional work. Village Staff requests
approval for the additional cost due the contractor since the final cost is above the contract amount.
Please include this item on the October 3rd Village Board Meeting Agenda.
/"? ~. .~--) I'
I.':'~' .
.' ~..... ~., -.....,//f/.. "'.,
Matthew P. Lawrie ~
cc; Village Clerk Lisa Angell
h:\engineering\bridges\2006project\baJance _ memo.doc