Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0934_001
Next Ordinance No. 5055 Next Resolution No. 53-99 ORDER OF .. REGULAR MEETING Mount-ifleeting Location: Mount Prospect Senior Center 90 South Emerson Street r -ct, Illinois 60056 KIMBERLY A. DEWIS Deputy Village Clerk ALL Meeting1. CALL TO ORDER Date • Tuesday November 16, 1999 7:30 P.M. I1. ROL.L. CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Daniel Nocchi Trustee Paul Hoefert 11 Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Richard L ohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Ill. INVOCATION: Trustee L.o h rstorfe r N ■ � /► � Mn • A � • tit] i tMr M► M . V11. MAYOR'S R', REPORT A. PROCLAMATION: Geography Awareness Week, November 14-20,1999 B. Appointments T +� ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE" MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 8471392-6000, TDD 8471392-60640 f3USINESS ZBA 29-99, 901 W. Golf Road ist reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 901 WEST GOLF ROAD (Exhibit A) (Deferred from the October 19, 1999 Village Board meeting) Thils ordi,inance grants a Conditional Use for the converst on of a single-family r "dence to a church, and for the constrUction of a, parking lot. The Zoning esl Board of Appeals recommended approval, with conditions, by a vote of 4-0. 2 d reading of AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLAT OF VACATION FOR A PUBLIC ALLEY LOCATED IN LOT I OF THE PROSPECT PLACE OF RESUBDIVISION (Exhibit 13) ZBA 31-99, 600 E. Rand Road, Northwest Electric Supply Company 1 Ist reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-1 AND C-R TO B-3 (COMMUNITY SHOPPING), AND GRANTING VARIATIONS TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 600 EAST RAND ROAD (Exhibit C) This ordinance grants rezoning from R-1 (Single Family Residential) and C-R (Conservation Recreation) to B-3 (Community Shopping) District, as well as variations to the required lot coverage and side yard setbacks. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 4-0. 2. 11' reading of AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF (Exhibit D) RESUBDIVISION This plat consolidates the subject lot into one lot of record, to bring the property into compliance with Village Code requirements that prohibits buildings being constructed over property lines. 3. reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION •FROIF'�� DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY LOCATED , AT 600 EAST RAND ROAD (Exhibit E) This ordinance grants an exception from the Development Code to reduce the required twenty'foot (20') utility easement to ten feet (10') along the rear property line,, 4*1 i't reading of AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLAT OF VACATION FOR UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED IN LOTS I AND 2 OF THE (Exhibit F) ALMA H. MUELLER SUBDIVISION This plat vacates existing public utility easements on the subject property which are no longer necessary for the proposed development. N5W BUSINESS PC, 04-991t 3,01 S. I '-O,ka',Av0n,ue,, St., Raymond De Penafort Parish A. 4, The petitioner is requesting approval of a Plat of Subdivision consolidating the s.ubjedt propertysubdivision, and an exception to the Development Gode requirement fbr a twenty , ot easement along the rear property line. The Plan Commission has recommended approval of the plat and Development Code exception by a vote of 6-0. B. ZBA 32 991,3032-3034 W. Algonquin Road,, Dearborn Villa's The petiti'onlier is requesting a Conditional Usef,or a Planned Unit Development and a Van'a'tloh to increase the permitted lot coverage to permit decks/patilos for a 22 unit juplex development. The Zoning Board of Appeals haz, recommended approval by a vote of 4-0. C. ZBA 26-99, 820 E. Rand Road, Taco Bell/KFC The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use and Variations for the establishment of a fast food restaurant with drive-through. The Zoning Board of Approval has recommended approval of this request, with specific conditions, by a vote of 4-0. D. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT (Exhibit G) E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9 OF THE VILLAGE CODE RELATIVE TO UTILITY LINE CLEARANCE (Exhibit H) F. Award of contract for outsourcing the printing and mailing of vehicle sticker application forms. xl# VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT A. Bid results: 1. Three (3) plain paper copiers for various departments B. Request to waive the bidding procedure and ratify award of service contract to United Brick Pavers for sidewalk installation. C. Ameritech accelerated build -out program D. Accept proposal for the installation of mono -slab repair and installation at Des Plaines River backwater valves E. Approve purchase of Village internet web page server F. Request for authorization for purchase of document imaging system G. Status Report X111. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES of THE REGULAR MEETING of THE MAYOR AND BOARD of TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE of MOUNT_PROSPECT NOVEMBER 2, 1999 GALL CALL To ORDER TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL ROLL CALL Present upon roll call,, Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Daniel Nocchi Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Irvana Wilks Absent: Trustee Timothy Corcoran PLEDGE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Trustee Nocchi. INVOCATION INVOCATION Trustee Wilks gave the invocation. MINUTES APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held October 19, 1999. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Nocchi, Lohrstorfer Nays: None Motion carried. BILLS APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to approve the following list of bills; General Fund $ 381,943 Refuse Disposal Fund 46 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 30486 Community Development Block Grant Fund 910 Local Law Enforcement dock grant bund '97 1,103 Debt Service Funds Capital Improvement Fund 22,955 Police & Fire Building Construction Fund Capital Improvement Construction Fund 34,323 Downtown Redevelopment Const. Fund 20,579 Street Improvement Construction Fund 141,513 1998A Flood control Construction Fund Flood Control Construction Fund 940 Water & Sewer Fund 2630380 Parking System Revenue Fund 6,050 Vehicle Maintenance Fund 12,29$ Vehicle Replacement Fund 39124 Computer Replacement Fund 743 Risk Management Fuad 31633 Police Pension Fund 24o641 Fire Pension Fund 19v326 Flexcomp frust Fund 12,797 Escrow Deposit Fund 540021 Benefit Trust Funds 544 $1,003,360 Norton Geller, 301 Autumn Lane, offered his assistance in providing names of independent claims adjusters, if the Board decides to use that service. ZBA 29-99 OLD BUSINESS 901 W. GOLF IBA 29-99,901 W. Golf Road 1't reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY ROAD COMM"ONLY KNOWN AS 901 WEST GOLF R,OAD This ordinance was deferred to the November 16, 1999 Village Board meeting. Page 2 -- November 2, 1999 Upon roll call,: Ayes: Nocchi, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Lohrstorfer Nays: None Motion carried. MAYOR'S REPORT MAYOR'S The following employees were recognized for celebrating their milestone quinquennial REPORT anniversaries within 1999, with the Village: EMPLOYEE NAM ERY1 DEPARTMENT RECOGNITION William Cooney 5 Community Development Nina Persino 5 Human Services Julie Gutierrez 5 Human Services Nancy Morgan 15 Human Services A resolution was presented which would establish the Village Millennium Project for the MILLENNIUM 1 0 year 2000. The Village, the Mount Prospect, Historical, �Society, and the M,ount Prosp', ct PROJECT Public Library will participate in a prof ec ' t sponsored by the White House, Washingto'n, D.C., with the program soliciting input from local youth, relatip ve,to memorableftems,and times within this century. RES. Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for approval of Resolution No. 50-99: NO. 50-99 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT'S "MILLENNIUM PROJECT"" FOR, THE YEAR 2000 Upon roll call-, Ayes: Nocchi, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Lohrstorfer Nays: None Motion carried. APPTS. No commission appointments were made. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD CITIZENS Bill Reddy, 105 S. Elm Street, addressed the Board with a number of concerns relative to the Village's second housekeeping policy. Mayor Farley and Director of Community Development William Cooney assured him that staff would follow up on the issues that he presented. Norton Geller, 301 Autumn Lane, offered his assistance in providing names of independent claims adjusters, if the Board decides to use that service. ZBA 29-99 OLD BUSINESS 901 W. GOLF IBA 29-99,901 W. Golf Road 1't reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY ROAD COMM"ONLY KNOWN AS 901 WEST GOLF R,OAD This ordinance was deferred to the November 16, 1999 Village Board meeting. Page 2 -- November 2, 1999 go low low, Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved to concur with the recommendation Of the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant the requested rezoning and variations in Z'BA 31-9,9'. Upon roll call.- Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays. None Motion carried. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4993 AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 WEST BUSSE AVENUE, YE OLDE TOWN INN Page 3 — November 2, 1999 An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the November 16, 1999 Village Board meeting. MPPD/ A resolution was, presented for''the renewal of the Mount, Prospect, Police substation lease RANDHURST at Randhurst Shopp'in,g Center., The, 1, ease, will be: renewed fora two-yea1r, period, LEASE beginning Novemberl,, 1999, at a cost of $2 mon,thly for rental, Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for approval of Resolution RES. No. 51-99: NO. 51-99 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND ROUSE-RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. AMEND ORD. 4993 An ordinance was presented to amend Ordinance, No,. 49 ,93, passed February, 2, 1999, to authorize the purchase or condemnation of Ye Olde T om Inn atB'usse Avenue. The proposed ordinance clarifies the actual land boundaries that have been modified as YE OLDE TOWN part of recent negotiations between the Village and the property owner. INN Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance NO. 5054 No. 5054: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4993 AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 WEST BUSSE AVENUE, YE OLDE TOWN INN Page 3 — November 2, 1999 Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. VILLAGE Nays: None MANAGER'S Motion carried - PROSPECT An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would allow the vacation of a public PLACE PLAT alley located within Lot #1 of the Prospect Plat of Resubdivision. OF RESIUB- Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur with the DIVISION The ordinance will be presented for a second reading at the November 16 Village Board GUIDELINES meeting. EASEMENT Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks AGRMT. A resolution was presented, which would allow the Village to enter into an easement W/COM ED agreement with Commonwealth Edison Company for the installation of a public sidewalk SPACECO along the west side of Redwood Drive, south of Cottonwood Drive; the sidewalk will cross property owned by Commonwealth Edison. RES. Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution NO. 52-99 No. 52-99: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT ACROSS THE COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PROPERTY AT REDWOOD 131211VE Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. VILLAGE VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT MANAGER'S A proposal from Wolff Clements and Associates,, D. was presenled for, the REPORT: development of commercial corridor design guidel'ihes, in an am,ount not to exceed $50,000. CORRIDOR Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur with the DESIGN recommendation of staff to accept a proposal for commercial corridor design guidelines, GUIDELINES not to exceed $50,000. WOLFF Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks CLEMENTS & Nays: None ASSOC. Motion carried. SPACECO Mr. Janonis presented a request for the ratification of'prior''approval of expenditures totaling $52,582, to SpaceCo, Inc. for Alta Surveys. These 'surveys, provided to Norwood Buil dersfdr, land that is being conveyed to them, are required to identify all easements and boundary lines that might affect the property title. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Nocchi moved to approve the expenditures to SpaceCo, Inc. for survey fees related to downtown redevelopment in the amount of $52o582. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. SOUNDS OF Mr,,Janonis presented a request frorni the Special Events Commission for approval, of rho THE SEASON expenditure of fUnds, pr e',viously allocated for Hometown Days events, to be u,sed towards, FUNDING financing the 1,999, Sounds, of the Season choral event. He explained that the Special I Events Commission had hoped to resume the annualcelebration of" Hometown Days,, which has not been held for the last few years, and that $,5,,000 had been allocatedfor thisproject. Because Sounds of the Season, previously held at Randhurst Shopping Page 4 — November 2, 1999 Center, will be held at the new Veterans Memorial Bandshell, financial assistance will not be received from landhurst, creating a need for the transfer of a portion of the $5,000 for this event. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for the approval of Hometown Days funds to be used for Sounds of the Season. Upon roll call: Ayes; Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays; None Motion carried. REMODELING: A request was presented for acceptance of a pr csel from Hendricksen of l VILLAGE HALL p Itasca, IL. and Corporate Vision Interiors of Lemont, IL. for remodel'ing and furniture for the POLICE Department of Community Development, and the Police Department. DEPARTMENT As part of the contract, Herildricksen will supply remodeling mat 'l lis for the Village Hall for an amount not to exceed $39,300, and Corporate Vision will supply that for the Police Department for an amount not to exceed $15,100. Tr'Ustee"Wilks,questioned staff srecommendation to award contracts to these companies without going out for bl st, Glen Aindlier,, Director of Publi,c Works,, explained that all of the furnishing's; bein s d In recent rernodeling,, are modular, interchangeable pieces that could,easily b combin ars reused lf'nbuilding were 000structed for Village Hall in the, futu re. He, fu �hper I in that many furniture rn.anuf ctur rs have exclusive contracts with distrIbutorsfot, their, products within a given area,, which does not allow for another distributor to handle those furnishings. With the Village having already purchased furniture from these companies for past remodeling projects, subsequent pieces will be purchased from them. Trustee Hoefert stated his support of the proposal, and asked the Board to consider discussing the matter of a new Village Hall in the very near future. Tr ste�es Nocchi koron, and Lohrstorfer agreed that the discussion of a new Village Hall should a priority, and placed on a Committee of the'Whole agenda during the early part ofthe'year 2000. hlENDRIC SEN Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to waive the bidding procedures and award contracts to Hendricksen of1tasca,and Cor orate Vision Interiors for remodeling and fumi� t re purchases in an arnount not to exceed , Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, ,kowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. TRAIN Mr. Janonisresented a proposal f NOISE LEVEL p p posa or a noise level analysis along the Wisconsin ventral Rail System, between Kensington Road and Camp McDonald Road, where a second ANALYSIS track is proposed. He explained the need for the establishment of baseline data, relative to sound levels produced by the rail system passing through the Village. The company, Stanley Consultants would monitor noise levels for two 24-hour periods, once during the week and once during the weekend, would conduct train counts, train speeds, and other sources which might produce noise, or sound, in this area. Mr. Andler stated that he had contacted other companies for this service, but none were equipped to adequately perform this study. STANLEY Trustee Nocchi, seconded d by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to accept the proposal from Stanley consultants for the Metra North central Commuter Line Noise Level eel Analysis, for the amount of $14,505. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. BUILDING Mr. Janonis presented a request for the acceptance of a proposal from Albrecht DEMOLITION Enterprises, Inc. of Des Plaines, Illinois, for the demolition of properties recently purchased by the Village for downtown redevelopment. The targeted properties are 10 S. Main Street, 117 S. Main Street, 14 E. Northwe,st Highway, 30 S. Main Street, 3 W. Central Road, and 18 W. Busse Avenue. ALBRECHT Proposals were received from Albrecht Enterprises, Inc., Robinette Demolition, Inc., and United Environmental Consultants, Inc., (See attachment to official minutes). Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to concur with the recommendation of staff to award a contract to Albrecht Enterprises, Inc. for the demolition and soil remediation of the above properties, in an amount not to exceed $136,864. Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Hoefert asked the Board to consider the demolition of two additional buildings on Northwest Highway that are part of the downtown development triangle, and using those properties for parking areas. Mr. Cooney responded that staff has considered the future of the buildings, however, because plans have not been finalized, they have chosen not to demolish them at this time. OTHER ANY OTHER BUSINESS BUSINESS Trustee Wilks encouraged the audience to participate in the Kiwanis Club Food Drive for families in need. Trustee Wilks also referred to an article in the most recent Mount Prospect Newsletter, related to individuals being employed to perform exterior home inspections. Mr. Cooney explained that this is not a new program or a cha;nge in policy, and khat the Village has previously used, seasonal help college students and� part time employees as part of its ongoing efforts to, identify properties that, are *in violation of Village Codes and neglected properties. Resident, Richard Banas, Berkshire Lane, asked for a completion date for road work being done in his area. Mr. Andler stated that September 30 was the projected date, and that he expects it to be completed within the next month. CLOSED CLOSED SESSION SESSION Mayor Farley stated that there was no need for a Closed Session. ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Page 8 —November 2, 1999 If VILLAGE C7F MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION November 11, 1999 Cash & lnvstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash, & Invstmt Balance 11/01/99 Per Attached Credits/ Balance . . . . ......... .. ---------- 11/01/99 11/11/99 List of Bills Debits 11/'11199 General Fund a N% lmial"',fty 5,553,453 1,476,469 47113-5-B (12,158) 6,146,008 Refuse Disposal Fund 852,749 142,051 147,'1772 (72) 847,351 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 478,305 119j816 2,140 Community Development Blk Grant Fund (11454) 4t950 595t981 Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 11,493 (60404) Local Law Enfrcmt Blk Grant Fd 1996 681 644 11,493 37 Debt Service Funds Q p, It al Proj9,9k,,-Fu. 4,857,795 213,005 21981,840 (975) 2,097,985 Capital Improvement Fund 115360436 50035 28,294 291,000 10804,177 Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 52,257 Capital Improvement Construction Fund 4180158 (291,000) 52,257 127o158 Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 11339, 2 70 6,613 Street Improvement Construction Fund 31137t402 72,072 19020 14 057 11332t657 1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,558 , 31222,111 Flood Control Construction Fund 599,325 285,158 41558 tert3j. isel n S 314,167 Water & Sewer Fund 21641,906 325,114 227,291 (850) 2,738,879 Parking System Revenue Fund 685,673 51498 11050 690,121 Inte,mil Sgrml I geLEunda Vehicle Maintenance Fund 198,601 45 26,273 11462 173,835 Vehicle Replacement Fund 40704,947 41178 Computer Replacement Fund 237s049 41 700,769 Management Fund 3t3869808 24,066 95,222 237,049Risk T'rurA.-&,Aqgncy.Em-nds, ey 31315,652 Police Pension Fund 290273,842 38v655 Fire Pension Fund 301717,027 31,734 29,312,497 Flexcomp Trust Fund 14,828 7,897 12t760 30,748,761 Escrow Deposit Fund 11349,350 101,057 270609 (1 t264) 9,965 11421,534 Benefit Trust Funds 114,537 114,537 $92,174,596 211629114 4y323j576 0 909013j135 w REPORT: AP RPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE 1 RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VENDOR NBRrVENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT NON -DEPARTMENTAL 02016 ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY SEPTEMBER COLLECTIONS 27522.00 02849 BISHOP PLMMING COMPANY PERMIT 25.00 PERMIT 100.00 125.74 02921 BLUE, MICHAEL FIE Cm -OCT 95, 00 FLU CGHP-OCT 547.75 692.75 04329 BRACKETT, ROBERT AND TAX REBATE 530.70 02948 BROBER, ILANA FLEX COMP -OCT 257.08 FLEX COMP -OCT 500.00 757.0$ 01044 CASTRO, DEBRA L. PAYROLL FOR - 110499 300.00 01772 CHERWriN, RANDY S. FLEX CHIP -OCT 430.12 04392` CIM�i►, EMILIA REFUND 24.00 01118 CLERK OF TBE CIRCUIT COURT PAYROLL FOR - 1104 99 700.00 PAYROLL FOR - 114499 13.00 PAYROLL FOR - 110499 519.23 PAYROLL FOR - 110499 190.00 1422.23 01167 LONDON, KEVIN J. £� C�lP-pCfi` 794.25 04330 CORTESE, STEVEN TAX REBATE 660.00 04343 CRXR, DAVID & CHERYL TAX REBATE 556.00 01241 DAWSON, HENRY C. FLEX CCKP-OCT 186.16 01259 DEUI`SCHMANN, TRUDY M. FLEX CCMP-OCT 389.64 04265 DIX, KENNETH S. PURCHASE 1801.89 04353 DOTTERER, MARY WATER 16.15 SEWER REFUND 1.70 01.381 FELSKI, ARTHUR W. FLEX CCHP-OCT 17.85 262.00 00102 FIRE PENSION FOND PAYROLL FOR - 110499 1219$,72 01405 FIRST COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYEE DENTAL PLAN 2473.88 00121 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO SAVINGS BONDS 600.00 01418 FLORY, JAMES M. FLEX COMP -OCT 95 , 96 04336 FOEHRING WILLIAM COMPUTER PURCHASE 2389.10 01421 FOLEY, APRIL B. FLEX COMP -OCT 1041.70 04331 GILL, GAJINDERPL FINAL WATER BILL 16,85 FINAL WATER BILL 1.75 01512 GORSKI, THEODORE F. FLEX COMP -OCT 18.672.18 01540 GUENTHER, JAMES E. FLEX COMP -OCT 1346.84 01592 H.E.L. P. CONTRIBUTION 22855.67 01560 HANSEN, DONALD E. FLS COMP-OCfi 46.60 00106 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401 PAYROLL FOR �- 114499 317.33 00107 ICFfiA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 PAYROLL FOR - 114499 15391.55 0010$ ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PAYROLL FOR - 110499 16329.28 01696 ILLINOIS LIQUID ENERGIES, INC. SUPPLIES 6804.98 GASOLINE 7754.45 14555.43 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE 2 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 01719 NF VOLUNTARY LIFE PREMIUM 11/99 240.00 01785 JULIANO, JAMES J. FLEX COMP -OCT 572.44 04352 KATH, RICHARD M. WATER REFUND 32.30 SEWER REFUND 3.40 35.70 01836 KOTLAR2, ANTHONY J. FLEX COMP -OCT 373.00 01852 LABBE, ALAN L. FLEX COMP -OCT 264.10 04344 LEE, KEMH R. COMPUTER PURCHASE 2242.94 01905 LOWS, VELMA W. FLEX comp-ocT 228-90 01942 MALCOLM, JOHN J. FLEX CORP -OCT 56.70 04338 MERTES, ERIC COMPUTER PURCHASE 1179.56 00116 METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PAYROLL FOR - 110499 255.00 00117 METROPOLITAN ALLIANCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 110499 570-00 02034 MILLER, JAMES FLEX Comp -OCT 262-00 02054 MORGAN, NANCYLOU M. FLEX COMP -OCT 192.59 04327 MULVIHILL DUP.PERMIT 25.00 02629 NANCY, STEIRMILLER, PAYROLL FOR - 110499 192.29 02199 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. CARTRIDGES 579.60 02278 PAVLOCK, RONALD W. FLEX Comp -OCT 245.00 00123 PEBSCO PAYROLL FOR - 110499 15267.35 00410 PETERSON, JAMES C. COMPUTER PURCHASE 2500.00 00124 POLICE PENSION FUND PAYROLL FOR - 110499 14832.2E 02431 RICHARDSON, RONALD E. FLEX COMP -OCT 214.73 02433 RICKER, JEFFREY FLEX CORP -OCT 180.00 04332 RISCH, MARK FINAL WATER BILL 2534 FINAL WATER BILL 2.72 28.56 02473 RUMORE, CINDY JO FLEX COMP -OCT 77.58 02493 SAVAGE, DAWN PAYROLL FOR - 110499 195.50 00125 SEIU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 110499 499.25 04181 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 110499 126.00 PAYROLL FOR - 110499 60.00 186.00 02644 STRAHL, DAVID FLEX COMP -OCT 264.26 02689 THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT BOND MONEY 3430-00 NOV1 BOND MONEY 1326.00 NOV2 BOND MONEY 3846-00 8602-00 02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE BY PHONE 3000-00 00127 UNITED WAY PAYROLL FOR - 110499 416.08 00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 110499 14826.98 DISBURSEMENTS 6700.00 DISBURSEMENTS 1000.00 22526.98 04314 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - PAYROLL WIRES PAYROLL FOR - 110499 110246-05 PAYROLL FOR - 110499 23578.43 PAYROLL FOR - 110499 23769.88 PAYROLL FOR - 110499 12673.50 170267.86 02825 WADE, MARILYN FLEX COMP -OCT 65.00 42853 WERDERITCHf RANDALL C. FLEX COMP -OCT 793.96 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE 3 RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 02886 WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE WI TAX 253.82 02899 WROBEL, HALINA E. FLU COKP-OCT 500.16 TOTAL 374270.00 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION A.R.D.C, REGISTRATION 140.00 02270 AT&T SERVICE 8.06 00353 JANONIS, MICHAEL E. RAFFLE PRIZES 44.97 02196 NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE LEGISLATIVE DINNER 80.00 02241 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 26.50 02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 16.28 01609 HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER MISC EXPENSES 38.99 01769 JFHINSj R.T. MISC EXPENSES 5.50 04322 MIDDLETON, JOAN MISC EXPENSES 200.00 04302 NICO MAK CCHPUTINGf INC. SOFTWARE, 260.77 02454 ROLLING EMS FLOWERS FLOWER'S 357.50 02479 RYDIN SIGN AND DECAL VEH STICKERS 826-50 04323 U.S. CC M TEE FOR UNICEF GREETING CARDS 40.92 02755 UNITED STATES CONF. OF MAYORS REGISTER GERALD FARLEY 375.00 TOTAL 2020.22 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE 01419 A.R.D.C, REGISTRATION 140.00 02270 AT&T SERVICE 26.8E 04324 BANK ONE MARK CEISEL RET.GIFT 257.50 RICHARD FRONCZAK RET.GIFT 257-50 MICHAEL KLEES RET -GIFT 257.50 772.50 01609 HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER SERVICE 64.00 01769 JFHINSj R.T. NEWSLETTER 5010.00 04322 MIDDLETON, JOAN REDM 31.91 04302 NICO MAK CCHPUTINGf INC. SOFTWARE, 22.00 02241 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 88.33 02249 OTTOSEN SIN ON TREVARTHEN i LEGAL FEES-P.D. 1796.00 02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 10.00 HISC EXPENSES 6.60 MISC EXPENSES 200.00 MISC EXPENSES 32.13 248.73 02379 QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 408.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 148-50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.14 582.64 TOTAL 8782.99 TV SERVICES DIVISION 02270 AT&T SERVICE 53.77 02241 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 176.67 02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT, MISC EXPENSES 5.89 MISC EXPENSES 16-50 REPORT: AP RPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE 4 RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VEM NBR VENDOR KM INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 22.39 TOTAL 252.83 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE 00382 LOWE I VELMA W EXPENSE 395.28 02139 NATIONWIDE PAPERS SUPPLIES 3181.62 02241 ONE STOP TELECOROICAT IONS SERVICE 88-33 02256 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. 72200641/75/703/2358 339.85 aY COPIER/BIDS 28.16 368.01 02536 SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC. SHIRTS 420-09 02632 STERLING CODIFIERS, INC. CODE UPDATE 7780.00 TOTAL 12239.33 FINANCE DEPART W 02270 AT&T SERVICE 26.88 SERVICE 102.16 129.04 02964 BT OFFICE PROD. INT'L., INC., OFFICE SUPPLIES 58.97 SUPPLIES 70.80 129.77 01049 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC CARTRIDGES 352.36 01223 DAILY OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 209-97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 74.88 284.85 01299 DRAWING BOARD ENVELOPES 156.40 01334 ELLSWORTH, DOUGLAS R. REIMB EXPENSES 271.80 01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AIRBILL 811189511301 14-00 01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. SUPPLIES 1225.50 PAPER 23.00 1248.50 04302 RICO MAK COMPUTING, INC. SOFTWARE 44.00 02241 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 335.67 02285 PEDERSEN & HOUPT TRANSFER TAX 110.00 02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 34.61 MISC EXPENSES 5.82 MISC EXPENSES 2.02 MISC EXPENSES 67.92 MISC EXPENSES 13.66 124.09 02479 RYDIN SIGN AND DECAL VEH STICKERS 3262.50 02672 SYSTEMS FORMS, INC. ENVELOPES 260.25 TOTAL 6723.23 CEMITY DEVELOPMENT 01518 AMBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP., INC. CARTRIDGE 120.19 01640 ANDERSON PEST CONTROL SERVICE 110.00 SERVICE 60.00 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED; 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE HOARD OF TRUSTEES FRCM NOVEMBER 011999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CEDA NORTHWEST SELF-HELP CENT 01783 JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS 170.44 02219 ARVEY PAPER SUPPLIES STOCK 63.12 02274 ATT SERVICE 26.88 SERVICE 40.33 SERVICE 69.90 SERVICE 21.51 SERVICE 21.51 wl"'---"." a 180.13 0109$ CD PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRITION 1.75.00 01369 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE SUPPLIES 314.00 04345 �, LESTER A. REGISTRATION 86.39 REGISTRATION 80.00 166.39 01698 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE SUBSCRIPTION 5.40 00366 KRUPA, M. REIMS 75.13 04341 LACI, AL EI�PENSE 668.25 01979 MCI WIRELESS SEPT SERVICE 220.39 SEPT SERVICE 94.61 SEPT SERVICE 73.95 42466 MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER cC���NITY GUIDE AD 3VVr95 1344.44 0432$ OFFICE CONCEPTS, INC SUPPLIES 612.03 04187 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLANHAL ON INV 11202765 20.00 42241 ONE STOP TELECOlR1NICATIONS SERVICE 88.33 SERVICE 132.50 SERVICE 229.67 SERVICE 70.67 SERVICE 70.67 02259 PAGENET SERVICE 591.84106.80 02379 QUILL CORPORATION' SUPPLIES 118.55 02691 THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS INSPECTION 1860.00 INSPECTION 1209.00 02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS3069.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 367.39 01522 W. W. GRAINGER INC. REPL BATTERY PACK 24.89 42832 WALL -MALT STORES, INC. PHOTO SUPPLIES 79.12 SERVICE 54.64 133.76 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 01815 AMSTERDAM CONTRACTORS COMPANY 01050 CEDA NORTHWEST SELF-HELP CENT 01783 JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS 02052 MORAN, MICHAEL J. 02407 REI REAL ESTATE INDEX, INC. 02420 RESOURCES FOR COMITY LIVING 02659 SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C TOTAL : 8671.42 WEATHERIZATION PROJECT 1500.00 JUL/AUG/SEP SERV 1750.00 CONS. PLAN 110.84 REM LOAN 162.50 REAL ESTATE 240.00 SERVICES 250.00 ACCESS TO CAREE SERV 916.66 REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 48:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE 6 RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF RILLS. PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 111999 MDOR NBR VEW NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT TOTAL 4950.00 Igo 02270 AT&T SERVICE 01018 CALIGOR SUPPLIES 02241 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE POLICE 02270 AT&T SERVICE 00435 BEACH, JUSTIN EXPENSES 00439 BECHTOLD, MARE EXPENSES 01077 CHICAGO Cts. SERVICE, INC. KAINTRNANCE 41139 COLLEGE OF LAKE COUNTY REGISTRATION 043561 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BALANCE OF 1996 LLEBG 01350 ENDEAVOR PLUS MEDICAL EXAMS MEDICAL MAMS 00323 ETERNO, MICHAEL EXPENSES 01366 EXPERIAN SERVICE 01497 GLENDALE INDUSTRIES UNIFORM 01558 HANSEN ASSOCIATES SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 00106 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 401 CONTRIBUTION 01694 ILLINOIS LAW ENFORCEMENT SUBSCRIPTION 01101 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. SUPPLIES 01751 INVENTORY TRADING CO SUPPLIES 02408 JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES SERVICE 01794 KALE UNIFORMS, INC. UNIFORM 00371 LANDEWEER, MICHAEL REIMS EXPENSES 01901 LITTLE AMERICA PRISONER FOOD 04339 MCGUFFIN, MARK REIMBURSE EXPENSES 04350 MEISTER, MICHAEL REIMBURSE 42155 NEXTEL COM 31CATIONS SERVICE 02182 NORTHERN ILLINOIS POLICE ALARM SYSTEM SERVICE 02189 NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES -DEC. 02241 ONE STOP TELECOM MUN ICATIONS SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE 02304 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES 96.7$ 226.45 318.00 641.23 545.75 115.50 21.30 442.80 198.00 644.02 454.00 954.00 140 .00 30.00 25.00 334.70 237.62 100.00 256.38 322.28 •MMWX•.9B4RM.+Ai. � iAu �. �dr,IMN,•fMfi'.Yv.M.ef/M��•MNu. 916.28{j 425.63 24.00 920.00 71.00 175.00 57.90 35.00 236.40 30.00 141.00 273.06 30.00 26615.60 21.04 219.62 183.37 47.83 10.81 1793.17 2275.64 108.20 28.19 40.00 5.27 38.43 79.55 DEPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08-032 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE Nwi RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRCM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 02270 AT&T misc EXPENSES 16.00 02566 BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC. MISC EXPENSES 6.46 03915 BOARD OF CERTIFIED SAFETY PROF MISC EXPENSES 60.00 01006 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. CAR WASH 382.10 02495 SAYERS COMPUTER SOURCE TONER 351.87 02680 TELETRAC, INC. SERVICE 1054.00 02796 VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC. RADIO REPAIR 372.00 02893 WOLF CAMERA, INC. PHOTO PROCESSING 15.01 01328 EL -COR INDUSTRIES, INC. PHOTO PROCESSING 27.63 01350 ENDEAVOR PLUS EMPLOYEE TESTING 42.64 004650 ZBORIL, DAVID REIMBURSEMENT 30.00 0 TOTAL 1 0, 38224-39 01195 AGA GAS, INC. RENTAL 64-34 02270 AT&T SERVICE 535.00 02566 BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC. EXTINGUISHER 17.65 03915 BOARD OF CERTIFIED SAFETY PROF MANUALS 95.00 01006 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. CAR WASH 21.00 01137 COLFAX WELDING FABRICATING MATERIALS 111.76 04333 COOK COUNTY CLERK MEMBERSHIP 10.00 04194 CYL-TEC HYDRO TESTING 20.00 04334 DUKE'S OIL SERVICE, INC. REMOVE WASTE OIL 50.00 01328 EL -COR INDUSTRIES, INC. PARTS 218.49 01350 ENDEAVOR PLUS EMPLOYEE TESTING 560.00 01369 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE SUPPLIES 211.00 01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AIR BILL 804028598139 9.40 AIR BILL 40049793225 103.20 112.60 00331 FIGOLAH, MICHAEL EXPENSES 55.00 01400 FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICATIONS IFSTA MANUALS 1161-85 01431 FOSTER COACH SALES INC. misc BULBS 281.26 01511 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES TIRES 235.47 REPLACE TIRES 318.56 554-03 01548 HAIGES MACHINERY REPAIR 265.81 04349 HB CLIMBING EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 554.38 01610 HOME DEPOT GLOVES 75.96 00350 HUEMANNI ANTHONY EXPENSES 285.00 01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. SUPPLIES 230.00 01793 KAISER PROFESSIONAL PHOTO LAB TRAINING PHOTOS 6.50 01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. AUTO PARTS 18.00 01941 MALCOLM, JOHN REFERENCE BOOK 42.20 02039 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. SERVICE CONTRACT 880.00 02075 MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS INC. AIRFARE 292.00 02107 NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY AUG/SEP/OCT 1273.56 04351 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF EMD MEMBERSHIP 45.00 02109 NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES -DEC. 6653.90 02241 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 144.55 SERVICE 1B.78 SERVICE 26.43 SERVICE 165.65 REPORT: AP8=RPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE 6 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VMR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 01008 BUSSE'S ROWERS i GIFTS SERVICE 42.77 UNIFORM RENTAL 181.13 SERVICE 69.25 593.84 SERVICE 121.86 GARMENTS 335-07 SERVICE 52.61 60735510016 14.00 SERVICE 10.82 SUPPLIES 15.00 SERVICE 1757.84 2B2.93 SERVICE 2410.56 04358 PETRO, SCOTT SCUBA DIVE TRN 100.00 02303 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. MEETINGS,TRAININGISUPP 55.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 89.89 MEETINGS,TRAININGISUPP 11.75 MEETINGSITRAININGISUPP 19.43 MEETINGSrTRAINING,SUPP 25.61 MEETINGSITRAININGtSUP? 13.97 MEETINGS, TRAINING, SDPP 15-97 142.13 02327 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. FLAT TIRE 131.00 04359 PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL REGISTER-HUEM ANN 250-00 04340 U.S. CAVALRY UNIFORMS 110.02 00450 VALENTINE, R. PAUL EXPENSES 375.00 02782 VALVOLINE, INC. SUPPLIES 212.85 04345 VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE NEW HIRE 537.88 02832 WAL-MART STORES, INC. FILM PROCESSING 153.63 04143 WAVE PRINTING INC. PRINTING 351.00 BUSINESS CARDS 144.00 495.00 PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTR 02270 AT&T 00477 SURES, PAUL 01008 BUSSE'S ROWERS i GIFTS 01097 CINTAS CORP 01164 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS 01474 GE MPLER'S INC 01609 HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER 02042 MINUTEMAN PRESS 02241 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS 02401 RED WING SHOE STORE 04325 UGOLINII RICHARD 02801 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS TOTAL *. 19619.36 SERVICE 344.12 CLOTHING ALLOW 115.23 FLOWERS 57.00 GARMENTS 231.20 UNIFORM RENTAL 181.13 UNIFORMS 181.51 593.84 SERVICE 205.00 GARMENTS 335-07 60732410018 14.00 60735510016 14.00 28-00 SUPPLIES 15.00 SUPPLIES 267.93 2B2.93 SERVICE 1130.67 SAFETY SHOE 85.00 REIMS FOR CDL 50.00 CR.OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.69 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 91.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 89.89 CR.OFFICE SUPPLIES 91.06' REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15-26 PAGE 9 RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VENDOR NBR ------------- VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 59.20 02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT SUPPLIES 364.94 MISC-OFFICE SUPPLIES 523.21 888.15 02844 WEARGUARD GARMENTS 246.77 GARMENTS 145.62 392-39 TOTAL 4566.60 PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS/B 01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. MISC-SUPPLIES 40.79 MISC.SUPPLIES 44.71 85.50 01423 ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY MATERIALS 290.33 01591 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER COMPAN SERVICE 66.82 01840 ANDERSON PEST CONTROL SERVICE 66.25 02167 ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 501.75 02788 BEST QUALITY CLEANING, INC. SERVICES 6815.50 01026 CANNON FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE 950.00 01058 CENTURY LABS, INC SUPPLIES 128.94 SUPPLIES 64.35 SUPPLIES 284.70 477.99 01060 CENTURY TILE TEXTURE TILE/TROWEL 24.86 01069 CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CLEANING SUPP 386.27 01103 CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI SERVICE 132.27 04326 COMPLETE PUMP SERVICE CO. INC. SERVICE 800.00 01253 DES PLAINES GLASS COMPANY WINDOWS 2380#00 01291 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY MAINTENANCE 190.57 01576 HELLER LUMBER CO. SUPPLIES 498.00 01896 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIES 59.58 01819 KIEF? BROTHERS INC. PARTS 1480.70 01.893 LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO. VAR INV/CR 3190.80 01990 MCMASTER-CARR DUCK FAR 39-20 02032 MILLER SALES, INC. REPAIR 71.35 02129 NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR REPAIR 270.00 02583 SOUND INCORPORATED REPAIRS 120.00 02586 SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY SAFETY CONTROL 717.78 FLARE SEFETY CONTROL 109.46- 608.32 02754 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LAND LEASE -OCT 1050.1B 00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCT 1011141 17.85 01522 W. W. GRAINGER INC. SUPPLIES 59-21 SUPPLIES 74.34 1_14--�w 133.55 04280 W.W. MANUFACTURING CO. DURA RAMS 304.90 02896 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO CLEANING 1162.00 TOTAL 22174.54 REPORT: APBOAMRPT., GENERATED: 2-91 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE 10 RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/ 01169 AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. CHAIN SAW PARTS 88.74 02607 BC LANDSCAPE INC. TREES 1225.00 IIt PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERI TREES 100.00 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. MAINTENANCE TREES 665-00 53.47 MAINTENANCE TREES 190.25 udli 01639 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 1993E GO P&I 1600.00 2780.25 02745 BERTHOLD NURSERY TREES 1780.50 COMMONWEALTH EDISON SEPT SERVICE TREES 3340.75 COOK COUNTY TREASURER 1999 MAINTENANCE TREES 4000-00 LAWRIE, MATT REIMS EXPENSES TREES 3996.75 RUEFFER STAMP WORKS RUBBER STAMPS TREES 920.00 TOPCON MIDWEST SUPPLIES TREES 440.00 TREES 800.00 TREES 1047.00 16325-00 01429 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC, SUPPLIES 163.10 01918 LUNDSTRON'S NURSERY SHRUBS 200-00 MOWING 2912.39 3112.39 02151 NETHERLAND BULB CO., INC. BULBS 1084.82 01578 ROBERT W. HENDRICKSEN CO. SERVICE 14796.00 IIt PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERI 01302 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. MAINTENANCE 800.00 MISC.SUPPLIES 53.47 MAINTENANCE 800.00 87.44 01639 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 1993E GO P&I 1600.00 02223 ASCE - ACCOUNTING DEPT., MEMBERSHIP 160-00 01147 COMMONWEALTH EDISON SEPT SERVICE 29680.68 04355 COOK COUNTY TREASURER 1999 MAINTENANCE 539.83 00374 LAWRIE, MATT REIMS EXPENSES 117.25 02470 RUEFFER STAMP WORKS RUBBER STAMPS 142-00 02704 TOPCON MIDWEST SUPPLIES 186.10 TOTAL : 32425.86 PUBLIC WORKS - WATER/SEW 01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. MISC.SUPPLIES 33.97 MISC.SUPPLIES 53.47 87.44 01639 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 1993E GO P&I 15621.57 1993E GO P&I 111800.00 121421-57 01780 AMERITECH SERVICE 22.75 02270 AT&T SERVICE 71731 02451 BADGER METER INC METERS 368-46 02938 BUM DISTRIBUTION CENTER VAR OCT INVS 511.34 01014 CADE INDUSTRIES RUBBER HATS 1277-00 GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1190 15:26 w PAGE ll RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOW OF TRUSTEES FROM 0 E 01 1999/ TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 �at DOR N B R VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 0 14 "INTAS CORP GAR.01TS 231.20 UNIF0PFj RENTAL 181-14 UNIFORMS 181-51 011664 CONCENTRA MEDICAL CENTERS SERVICE 205.00 011313 DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC. TOPSOIL 800.00 011,377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP SERVICE 42.40 r.-, ! 19 GATEWAY COMPANIES INC. UPGRADE 69.00 010: GEMPLER'S INC GARMENTS 335.08 0155, HUEY AND SONS, B. INC. REMOVE DEBRIS 587.50 01701 ILLINOIS PAPER CO. PAPER 485.00 01819 KIEFT BROTHERS INC. REPAIR 697-21 01918 LUNDSTROM'S NURSERY MOWING 235.00 019/36 MAIL BOXES ETC. USA UPS CHARGES 83.16 04196 MIKA, NANCY REIMBURSEMENT 72.88 02042 MINUTEMAN PRESS SUPPLIES 1268.38 02135 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL SAFETY FILM 65.00 02151 NETHERLAND BULB CO., INC. BULBS 10.07 00403 O'DON0VANr RODERICK REIN 87.90 04348 OKEH ELECTRIC CO. MCC REPT, 66600.00 SERVICE 8625.00 75225.00 02241 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 725.10 SERVICE 30.38 SERVICE 30.38 SERVICE 60.73 SERVICE 30.38 SERVICE 30.38 SERVICE 85.16 SERVICE 83.31 SERVICE 173.82 SERVICE 23.90 SERVICE 20.97 SERVICE 22.37 SERVICE 69.11 SERVICE 124.78 SERVICE 187.56 SERVICE 23.11 SERVICE 39.58 SERVICE 2358.52 4119.54 02247 OR R SAFETY PARTS 35.00 02334 POSTMASTER WATER BILLS 588.24 02672 SYSTEMS FORMS, INC. POSTCARDS 287.63 02735 U.S. FILTER DISTRIBUTION GROUP REPAIR SLEEVES 4508.16 02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE DEPOSIT -WATER BILL POSTAGE 5000.00 02835 WAREHOUSE DIRECT SUPPLIES 364-94 MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES 523.21 888.15 02844 WEARGUARD GARMENTS 392.38 02893 WOLF CAMERA, INC. FILM PROCESSING 102.83 TOTAL : 227190.73 R T : A PE an,:C GENERATED- OCT.06:32 RUN: THURSDAYNOV1.199 15:26 2 RELEASE ID VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM" NOTEV,3ER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 NBR TENDOR. WE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT WORES - :RE 1JSE DI ARC DISPOSAI COMPANY vi, AT I 021. CTZ' PISS 2 MIN In 1% l /.:r ONE STOP TELECOMMICATIONS PUB®IC WO - �rb''HICLE M 01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. 02270 AT&T 02617 BEARING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. 02938 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER 01006 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. 01038 CENTURY DABS, INC 41009 CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY 011162 COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS,IN 01311 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES 01705 ILLINOIS RECOVERY SYSTEMS 01872 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. 01914 LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. 04,337 MANUFACTURER SUPPLY CO. REBUILD ARO OIL PUMP 02059 'MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST AUTO PARTS 04357 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFERREGISTER-RORAY 02241 ONE'STOP TELECOMMICATIONS SERVICE 02326 POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 02374 QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS AUTO PARTS 02325 SECRETARY OF STATE STICKER RENEWAL 04335 TANKNOLOGY TESTING 02769 UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 02791 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM AUTO PARTS 02793 VERMEER-ILLINOIS, INC REPAIR PARTS 02861 WEST SIDE 'TRACTOR SALES SUPPLIES C. NITY SERVICE PROGRA 01144 COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SUPPLY 01422 FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC 02067 MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOLI. 02264 PAPERDIRECT, INC. 02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEFT. 02394 RACO SUPPLIES X - MAS DECORATIONS NOV PMT" SUPPLIES MSC EXPENSES TLS FOR EVENTS SIGN 49578.70 27758.37 29881.22 3061.09 9245.76 119525.14 10.75 84.11 35.33 TOTAL : 119655.33 9.16 40,33 27.04 1199.44 737.00 36.'96 77.60 675.00 526.06 35.00 1323.07 351.54 1674.57 75.00 10.00 85.00 142.00 470.00 985.00 132.50 457.40 12.58 48.00 2050.00 875.59 250.96 11,54.12 12.81 T 11714.10 5095.00 3025.00 2916.67 107.75 67.95 421.80 ,?,ORT: APBOARDRPT. GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:26 PAGE 13 RELEASE ID .- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT LIST , IST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES F i - IROF. NOVMER 01 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 1999 ---------- Tz,)%"DOR NBR 'VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMO`*N`T TOTAL 11634.17 2AYI)TTAL IMPROVEMENT PROD 01639 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 1994B GO BOND 01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. MISC.SUPPLIES 163.43 01620 AMERICAN LANDSCAPING INC. BUSH 800.00 01833 ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY SUPPLIES 54.23 02607 B� LANDS%r',APE INC.. BLUE ASH 1020.00 01045 CATCHING FLUIDPOWER PATRS 1371.25 01049 CDW GOVERNMENT, INC COMPUTER EQUIP 4745.93 01314 DUPONT FLOORING SYSTEMS CARPETING 2423-64 02476 EARTH TECH INC SEWER IMPR 24845.64 01469 GATEWAY COMPANIES INC. PC -MONITOR 1246.00 38758.50 1994A GO P&I PC -MONITOR 1246.00 69411.25 1994A GO P&I 140000.00 Wwlwo__'_'_ 2492.00 01580 HENRICKSEN & COMPANY, INC. PARTITIONS 9708.50 29698.13 1996A GO P&I SHELVING UNITS 1802-50 8936.25 11511.00 04347 SANE, MCKANNA & ASSOC. INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 5275.00 01914 LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. SERVICE 2282-87 02024 MIDWEST MOLE, INC. MAPLE/BERKSHIRE 259512.16 02311 PIERCE MANUFACTURING INC. RADIO WIRING 524.00 01438 S.B. FRIEDMAN & COMPANY REVIEW FEES 1337-55 04052 SCHROEDER & SCHROEDER INC SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT 27274.82 02671 SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS, INC. INV990800073/990900045 6904.00 TOTAL : 352537.52 DEBT SERVICE 01639 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 1994B GO BOND 70000.00 1994B GO BOND 1505.00 1996B GO BOND 125000.00 1996B GO BOND 11368.75 1998B GO BOND 2043.75 1998A GO BOND 9053.75 1998A GO BOND 51150.01 D/T REDEV. B&I 35000.00 D/T REDEV. B&I 270000.00 D/T REDEV. B&I 4220.00 D/T REDEV. B&I 31845.00 FLOOD CONTROL 325000.00 FLOOD CONTROL 17306.25 1993B GO BONDS 78300.00 1993B GO BONDS 22203.05 1993B GO BONDS 335600.00 1993B GO BONDS 58434.38 1993B GO BONDS 229300.00 1993B GO BONDS 38758.50 1994A GO P&I 490000.00 1994A GO P&I 69411.25 1994A GO P&I 140000.00 1994A GO P&I 20840.00 1996A GO P&I 150000.00 1996A GO P&I 29698.13 1996A GO P&I 140000.00 1996A GO P&I 8936.25 REPORT: APBOARDR.Dl' GENZIATT': 29 OCT 99 08:32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV1199 15:20 PAGE 14 RELEASE ID : VILLAGE OF HOW, PROSPECT VUDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AM031 19980 GO BONDS 95000.00 19980 GO BONDS 28725-01 2888699.08 04324 BANK ONE SSA #6 PRINCIPAL 25000.00 SSA #6 INTEREST 7990.00 32990-00 020624 TRE I.SU REER, STATE OF ILLIN;j_,. L17-0853 PRIN 35887-17 INTEREST 24263.56 TOTAL 2981839-81 RISE MANAGEMENT 04234 CCmS SERVICE FEE - NOVEMBER 300, 00 01306 DRUG CARD, INC, CLAIMS 2218.44 PRESC. CARD CLAIMS 25836-55 28054.99 01350 ENDEAVOR PLUS SVCS.RENDERED 93.00 01542 H.E.L.P. CONTRIBUTION 11427.83 01966 MARTIN BOYER COMPANY,INC WORKERS COMP 4893.73 02192 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SERVICE 259-83 02198 NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C. SERVICES 16.00 02852 WERDERITCH, RANDALL REI MB 46.38 il TOTAL * 45091.76 GRAND TOTAL -, 4323575.72 REPORT.- APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 29 OCT 99 :32 RUN: THURSDAY NOV119915:26 PAGE 1 RELEASE I M VILLAGE OF MOUNT POS ECT ST OF BILLS PRESENTEDTO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM NOVEMBER1 1999 TO NOVEMBER 11 199 SUMMARY BY FUND 001 GENERAL FUND 471355,74 030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 147177.33 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 2139.83 070 COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 4950.00 090 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 1996 644.02 170 REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 19938 494537o43 250 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 34.1.065.00 260 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994E 71505.00 270 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 136368.75 280 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & 11998E 2043.75 310 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 342306.25 320 REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993E 258058.50 330 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 160840.00 340 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 179698.13 350 FLOOD CONTROL — 1998A B & I 9053.75 360 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 19980 B & I 123725.01 380 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 60150.73 410 STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 559411.25 420 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 148936.25 430 STREET IMPROV B & 11998A 51150.01 510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FOND 28294.23 550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 6612.55 560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 1020.00 590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 285157.80 610 WATER AND SEWER FUND 227291.44 630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FOND 1050.18 660 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 26273.53 670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 4178.12 690 RISK MANAGEMENT FOND 95222.25 770 FLECOP ESCROW FOND 12759.58 790 ESCROW DEPOSIT FOND 27609.31 830 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 32990.00 -------------- TOTAL ; 4323575.72 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSpECT i B U])GET REVENUE AND ExPENDITURE SUMMARIES A., January I - October 31, 1999 11 11/09/1999 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13 :14 : 56 Budget Revenue Summary 2 Months 16.6% Remaining 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 1 Cur Mo Y--T-D 1999 Unreceive d Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent REVENUE BY CLL $SIFICATION PROPERTY TAXES 1,100,220 5,659,667 9,418,305 3,758,638 39.9 OTHER TAXES 2,056,415 121782,986 16,456,495 3,673,509 22.3 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 82,307 2,730,871 3,060,400 329,529 10.8 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 546,905 5,827,833 6,522,000 694,167 10.6 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 11108,157 10,113,322 11,99S,667 1,882,345 15.7 FINES AND FORFEITS 51,854 406,935 498,000 91,065 18.3 INVESTMENT INCOME 256,952 4,107,963 4,568,100 460,137 10.1 REIMBURSEMENTS 13,829 297,925 1,150,150 852122S 74.1 OTHER REVENUE 2751736 2,086,785 2,635,120 548,335 20.8 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1,225,000 90, 2680 368 12,383,857 3,115,489 25.2 Total All Funds 6j717j375 5'" 28 2, 655 68,688,094 15,405,439 22.4 REVENUE BY FUND GENERAL FUND 2,385,253 20,370,240 25,371,320 5,001,080 19.7 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 351,705 2,162,459 3,247,440 1,084,981 33.4 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 99,683 1;087,185 2,031,400 944,215 46.5 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 19 15,081 0 -15,081 COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT -106 162,833 399,000 236,167 59.2 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 5,000 5,000 100.0 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 1996 0 0 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 15,087 78,111 130,1465 52,354 40.1 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 19878 0 0 0 0 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0 REFUND 878 & 91A B&I 1993E 68,373 584,755 800,932 216,177 27.0 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992E 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 365,196 376,697 378,630 1,933 0.5 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 19948 23,990 25,730 25,765 35 0.1 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 19968 150,270 151,879 152,000 121 0.1 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & 119988 5,004 5,029 5,000 -29 -0.6 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & 1 1999 1,000,849 1,1,21,274 1,077,110 -441164 -4.1 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 21,993 172,302 260,000 87,698 33.7 REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993E 25,856 205,127 310,865 105,738 34.0 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 15,159 118,381 183,000 64,619 35.3 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 17,486 136,602 210,500 73,898 35.1 FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & 1 1,664 17,735 21,000 3,265 15.5 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 19980 B & 1 1 550 153,200 152,650 99.6 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 38,457 305,052 467,070 162,018 34.7 STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 53,357 408,306 630,000 221,694 35.2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 12,197 93,290 144,500 51,210 35.4 STREET IMPROV B & 11998A 8,319 89,689 103,000 13,311 12.9 STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 11,687 0 -11,687 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 28,615 770,983 1,381,390 610,407 44.2 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 221 2,027 0 -2,027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 1,134 452,345 300,000 -152,345 DOWNTOWN REDHVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 266,870 5,765,273 8F283,390 2,518,117 30.4 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 170,869 1,764,594 2,296,805 532,211 23.2 FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 18 156 0 -156 SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0 1 10 Months 83.3% Completed 11/09/1999 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining 13:14:57 Budget Revenue Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 iq Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 2,161 871,848 856r350 -15,498 -1.8 WATER AND SEWER FUND 764,680 51842,230 7,394,230 11552,000 21.0 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 17,117 171,830 212,100 40f270 19.0 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 88,862 895,228 1,064,740 169,512 15.9 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 112,357 IF943j9S7 2,134,556 190,599 8.9 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 10,426 102,777 118,631 IS f 854 13.4 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 272,634 2f7620117 3,213,460 451,343 14.0 POLICE PENSION FUND 103,645 21370,528 21637f260 266,732 10.1 FIRE PENSION FUND 212,141 1,824,984 2,638,360 813, 376 30.8 BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 549 51627 8,000 2 r 3 7 3 29.7 y1jeXCOMP ESCROW FUND 0 0 0 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 0 0 0 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS BEI 74 10,811 0 -10,811 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 5,190 25,346 41,625 16,279 39.1 SSA #7 WHITE OAK/METER B & 1 0 0 0 0 Total All Funds 6,717,375 53,282,655 68,688,094 15,405,439 . ......... 22.4 iq W09/1999 10 Months 83.3% } Completed X3:16:38 2 Months � 16.6 j Remaining VILLAGE OFMOUNTPROSPECT Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Sunmary 01/01/99 - 1.0/31/99 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 40 PROPERTY TAXES 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 48 OTHER REVENUE TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 43 INTERGOVERMENT INCOME46 INVESTMENT 47 REIMBURSEMENTS MOTORTOTAL FUEL TAX FUND LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 43 INTER.GOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT COMMUNITYDEVELPMNT BLOCK - 43 INTERGOVERMENT • INVESTMENT INCOME ,; OTHER REVENUE TOTAL• r DEVELPMNT BLOCK- ASSET SEIZURE FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 48 OTHER REVENUE TOTAL ASSET SEIZURE FUND LOCAL#W ENF BLOCK GRANT 199 I 43 r ■MENT ■ # • INVESTMENT INCOME 282,089 11451,099 Cur Mo 968,691 1999 Unreceived Unreceiv+ed 666,360 777,650 Received Received Budget Balance Percent GENERAL FUND 0 139 0 -139 40 PROPERTY TAXES 737,176 3,792,124 6, 304,.370 2,512,246 39.8 41 OTHER TAKES 975,856 8,354,125 9,874,000 1,519,875 15.4 42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 79,855 2,503,878 2,831,800 .327,922 11.6 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 449,255 4,170,604 4,613,000 442,396 9.6 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 40,978 467,979 555,300 87,321 15.7 45 FINES AND FORFEITS 51,854 406,935 498,000 91,065 18.3 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 29,465 320,625 325,000 4,375 1.3 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 13,754 219,153 255,750 36,597 14.3 48 {OTHER REVENUE 7,060 134,817 114,1.00 -20,717 -18.2 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 MOM TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,3851253 201370,240 25,371,320 51001,080 19.7 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 40 PROPERTY TAXES 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 48 OTHER REVENUE TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 43 INTERGOVERMENT INCOME46 INVESTMENT 47 REIMBURSEMENTS MOTORTOTAL FUEL TAX FUND LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 43 INTER.GOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT COMMUNITYDEVELPMNT BLOCK - 43 INTERGOVERMENT • INVESTMENT INCOME ,; OTHER REVENUE TOTAL• r DEVELPMNT BLOCK- ASSET SEIZURE FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 48 OTHER REVENUE TOTAL ASSET SEIZURE FUND LOCAL#W ENF BLOCK GRANT 199 I 43 r ■MENT ■ # • INVESTMENT INCOME 282,089 11451,099 2,419,790 968,691 40.0 67,067 666,360 777,650 111,290 14.3 2,549 44,861 50,000 5,139 10.3 0 139 0 -139 351,705 2,162,459 3,247,440 1,084,981 33.4 97,650 1,045,247 1,250,000 204,753 16.4 1,958 28,807 45,000 16,193 36.0 75 13,131 736,400 723,269 98.2 99,683 1,087,185 2,031,400 944,215 46.5 0 15,006 0 -15,006 19 75 0 -75 19 15,081 0 -150081 0 96,865 359,000 262,135 73.0 -106 334 0 --334 0 65,634 40,000 -25,634 -64.1 -106 162,833 399,000 236,167 59.2 0 0 5,000 5,000 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 5,000 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:1+6.39 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Sunmary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 I Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent TOTAL LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 1996 0 0 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 40 PROPERTY TAXES 14,809 76,179 127,465 51,286 40.2 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 278 1,932 3,000 1,068 35.6 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 15,087 78,111 130,465 52,354 40.1 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987B 40 PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 19878 0 0 0 0 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 40 PROPERTY TAXES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0 REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993B 40 PROPERTY TAXES 66,146 340,265 566,680 226,415 40.0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,227 19,251 10,000 -9,251 -92.5 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 225,239 224,252 -987 -0.4 TOTAL REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993E 68,373 584,755 800,932 216,177 27.0 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992B 41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992E 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 41 OTHER TAXES 363,630 363,630 363,630 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,566 13,011 15,000 1,989 13.3 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 56 0 -56 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 365,196 376,697 378,630 1,933 0.5 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994E 41 OTHER TAXES 23,765 23,765 23,765 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 225 1,965 2,000 35 1.8 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994B 23,990 25,730 25,765 35 0.1 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996B 41 OTHER TAXES 150,000 150,000 1501000 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 270 1,879 2,000 121 6.1 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996E 150,270 151,879 152,000 121 0.1 I 11109/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:16:39 VILLAGE OFMOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 13 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent DOWNTOWN REDEVL B& I 1998B 41 OTHER TAXES S,000 5,000 S,000 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 4 29 0 -29 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVL B& I 1998B 5,004 5,029 5j000 -29 -0.6 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & 1 1999 41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 849 1,274 45,500 44,226 97.2 48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 1,000,000 1,120,000 1,031,610 -88,390 -8.6 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDKVL B & 1 1999 1o000F849 1,121,274 1,077,110 -441164 -4.1 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 0 0 0 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 41 OTHER TAXES 20,377 160,612 250,000 89,388 35.8 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,616 11,690 10,000 -1,690 -16.9 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 21,993 172,,302 260f000 87,698 33.7 REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993E 41 OTHER TAXES 24,452 192,734 300,000 107,266 35.8 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,404 9,553 9,000 -553 -6.1 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 2,840 1,865 -975 -52.3 TOTAL REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993B 25,856 205,127 310,865 105,738 34.0 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 41 OTHER TAXES 14,427 113,713 177,000 63,287 35.8 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 732 4,668 6,000 1,332 22.2 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 150,159 118,381 183,000 64,619 35.3 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 41 OTHER TAXES 16,709 131,702 205,000 73,298 35.8 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 777 4,900 5,500 600 10.9 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 17,486 136,602 210,500 73f898 35.1 FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 41 OTHER TAXES 1,630 17,593 20,000 2,407 12.0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 34 142 1,000 858 85.8 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & 1 1,664 17,735 210,000 3,265 15.5 13 11/09/1999 10 months 83.3% Completed 13.1+6 :40 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 221 2,027 0 -2,027 1 1 TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 221 2,027 0 -2,027 I Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B a I 41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 152,600 152,600 100.0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1 550 600 50 8.3 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES0 0 0 0 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 19980 B Cc 1 1 550 1538200 152,650 99.6 EPA FLOOD LOAN B a I 41 OTHER TAXES 37,785 297,820 463,570 165,750 35.8 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 672 7,232 3,500 -3, 1 732 -106.6 TOTAL EPA FLOOD LOAN BEI 38,457 305,052 467,070 162,018 34.7 STREET IMPROVEMENT BaI 1994A 41 OTHER TAXES 50,127 385,768 615,000 229,232 37.3 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 3,230 22,538 15,000 -7,538 -50.3 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 53,357 408r306 630,000 221,694 35.2 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 41 OTHER TAXES 11,411 87,817 140,000 52,183 37.3 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 786 5,473 4F500 -973 -21.6 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 12,197 93,290 144j500 51f210 35.4 STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 41 OTHER TAXES 8,151 88,964 100,000 11,036 11.0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 168 725 3,000 2,275 75.8 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 ... . ........ TOTAL STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 8l319 89,689 103,r000 13j,311 12.9 STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 11,687 0 -11,687 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 11,,687 0 -11,687 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 6,679 63,852 50,000 -13,852 -27.7 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 4,000 130,000 126,000 96.9 48 OTHER REVENUE 21,936 86,936 135,000 48,064 35.6 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES0 616,195 1 1 1,066,390 450,195 42.2 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 28,615 770,983 1,381,390 610F407 44.2 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 221 2,027 0 -2,027 1 1 TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 221 2,027 0 -2,027 I a 9/1999 10 Months 83.3% } Completed. 13: 16:40 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months t 16.6% Remaining Budget Revenue by Category Within Fund Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 SSA #7 'WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST FLOOD CONTROL CONST" FUND 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 49 O'T'HER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 01 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 Cur Mcg 0 1999 Unreceived. Unreceived 32,810 Received Received Budget Balance Percent CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 0 789,038 856,350 67,312 7.9 2,161 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 0 450,111 300,000 -150,111 -50.0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 1,134 2,234 0 -2,234 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 1,134 452,345 300,000 -152,345 -54.8 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 49 OTHER .FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 41 OTHER TAXES 37,544 37,816 0 -37,816 42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 4,326 72,457 0 -72,457 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0 48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 225,000 5,655,000 8,283,390 2,628,390 31.7 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 266,870 5,765,273 8,283,390 2,518,117 30.4 S'T'REET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 41 OTHER TAKES 154,932 1,412,546 21026,805 614,259 30.3 42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 2,152 224,293 225,000 707 0.3 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 13,7B5 127,755 45,000 -82,755 -183.9 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 170,869 1,764,594 2,296,805 5329211 23.2 FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 18 156 0 --156 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 18 156 0 -156 SSA #7 'WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST FLOOD CONTROL CONST" FUND 43 INTERGOVERMENT REV. 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 49 O'T'HER FINANCING SOURCES TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 01 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 -50,000 2,161 32,810 0 -32,810 0 0 0 0 0 789,038 856,350 67,312 7.9 2,161 871,848 856,350 -15,498 -1.8 A 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:16:41 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months c 16.6% Remaining Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 Cur Mo ,Y -T -D 1999 Unreceived Unreceived Received Received Budget Balance Percent WATER AND SEWER FUND 41 OTHER TAXES 155,561 924,954 1,550,000 625,046 40.3 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 580,510 4,789,390 5,640,230 850,840 15.1 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 11,392 104,668 195,000 90,332 46.3 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 3,000 3,000 100.0 48 OTHER REVENUE 17,217 23,218 6,000 -17,218 -287.0 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL WATER AND SEWER FUND 764,680 5,842,230 7,394,230 11552y000 21.0 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 42 LICENSES, PERMITS & FEES 300 2,700 3,600 900 25.0 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 13,929 142,905 173,500 30r595 17.6 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 2,888 26,225 35,000 8,775 25.1 48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 17,117 171,r830 212,100 40,270 19.0 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 88,055 880,630 1,056,740 176,110 16.7 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 807 5,448 8,000 2,552 31.9 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 0 0 0 48 OTHER REVENUE 0 9,150 0 -9,150 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 88,8152 895,228 1,064,740 169,512 15.9 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 91,210 912,136 1,094,556 182,420 16.7 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 21,147 171,821 120,000 -51,821 -43.2 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 860,000 920,000 60,000 6.5 TOTAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 112,357 11943,957 2,134,556 190,599 8.9 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 9,454 94,723 113,631 18,908 16.6 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 972 8,054 5,000 -3,054 -61.1 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 10,426 102,777 118,631 15,854 13.4 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 44 CHARGES FOR SERVICE 216,954 21159,199 2,584,060 424,861 16.4 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 13,448 124,922 120,000 -4,922 -4.1 47 REIMBURSEMENTS 0 61,641 25,000 -36,641 -146.6 48 OTHER REVENUE 42,232 416,355 484,400 68,045 14.0 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 272,634 2,762,117 3,213,460 451,343 14.0 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:16 : 41 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 1 6.6% Remaining Budget Revenue by Category within Fund Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 SSA #7 WHITE OAK./METER B & I 41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B& I 0 0 0 0 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 4,225,000 4,225,000 100.0 TOTAL MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4r225,000 4,225,000 100.0 6 Cur Mo Y' -T -D 1999 Unreceived Unreceived .......... ........... Received Received Budget Balance Percent POLICE PENSION FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 72 1,610,449 1,620,000 9,551 0.6 48 OTHER REVENUE 103,S73 760,079 1,017,260 257,181 25.3 TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND 103,645 2,370,526 2,637,260 266,732 10.1 FIRE PENSION FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 128,423 1,234,527 11800,000 565,473 31.4 48 OTHER REVENUE 83,718 590,457 838,360 247,903 29.6 TOTAL FIRE PENSION FUND 212,141 1,624,984 2,638,360 813,376 30.8 BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 549 5,627 8,000 2,373 29.7 TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 549 5,627 6,000 2,373 29.7 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 0 0 0 0 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 48 OTHER REVENUE 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 0 0 0 0 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 41 OTHER TAXES 17 10,394 0 -10,394 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 57 417 0 -417 TOTAL SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 74 10,811 0 -10,811 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 41 OTHER TAXES 5,041 24,033 40,125 16,092 40.1 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 149 1,313 1,500 187 12.5 TOTAL SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 5,1190 25,346 41,625 16,279 39.1 SSA #7 WHITE OAK./METER B & I 41 OTHER TAXES 0 0 0 0 46 INVESTMENT INCOME 0 0 0 0 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 TOTAL SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B& I 0 0 0 0 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 49 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 0 0 4,225,000 4,225,000 100.0 TOTAL MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 0 4r225,000 4,225,000 100.0 6 11/09/1999 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months 83.3* Completed 13 :15: 43 Budget Expenditure Summary 2 Months 16.6% Remaining 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent EXPENDITURE BY CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 1,246,372 13,475,769 17,092,437 3,616,668 21.2 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 406,247 3,544,290 4,542,361 998,071 22.0 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 27,954 209,980 300,889 90,909 30.2 PENSION BENEFITS 253,332 2,457,904 2,977,370 519,466 17.4 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10169,054 9,607,128 12,563,653 2,956f525 23.5 UTILITIES 9,316 244,582 445,531 200,949 45.1 INSURANCE 176,016 21366,668 31435,977 10069,309 31.1 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 83,665 868,307 1,266,766 398,459 31.5 OTHER EXPENDITURES 59,155 5,177,562 7,590,211 2,412,649 31.8 LAND IMPROVEMENTS 490 329,432 566,547 237,115 41.9 BUILDINGS 0 0 0 0 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 18,239 57,586 254,587 197,001 77.4 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5,051 154,177 454,303 300,126 66.1 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 108,456 678,199 1,122,509 444$310 39.6 OTHER EQUIPMENT 65,180 393,519 713,195 319,676 44.8 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 0 19,439 545,300 525,861 96.4 INFRASTRUCTURE 720,864 41615,973 8,921t335 4$305,362 48.3 BOND PRINCIPAL 118,180 271,837 31073f310 21801,473 91.2 INTEREST EXPENSE 50,449 686,344 1,521r560 835,216 54.9 BANK AND FISCAL FEES 0 4,376 12,250 7,874 64.3 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 1,621,330 21152,507 531,177 24.7 Total All Funds 41518r020 46l7840402 69,552,598 22,768,196 32.7 EXPENDITURE BY FUND GENERAL FUND 1,867,922 20,849,485 26,686,024 5,8360539 21.9 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 249,096 2,420,652 3,159,716 738,864 23.4 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 9,060 1,366,814 2,257,350 890,536 39.5 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 1,108 8,979 0 -8,979 COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 10,,725 194,019 444,451 250,432 56.3 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 60,320 60,320 100.0 LOCAL LAW E BLOCK GRANT 1996 0 0 0 0 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 0 0 125,000 125f000 100.0 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987E 0 127,486 126,036 -1f450 -1.2 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 0 97,753 98,216 463 0.5 REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993E 0 60,863 576,680 495,817 86.0 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992E 0 56 0 -56 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1993A 0 36,515 3781630 342,115 90.4 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1994E 0 1,840 74,010 72,170 97.5 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPMNT B&I 1996E 0 11,819 148,440 136,621 92.0 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B& I 1998B 0 2,469 4,590 2,121 46.2 DOWNTOWN REDEVL 13 & 1 1999 0 117,949 470,415 352f466 74.9 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 0 2,840 1,865 -975 -52.3 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1992A 0 17,622 360,615 342,993 95.1 REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993B 0 38,872 307,320 268,448 87.4 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 0 21,008 182,180 161,172 88.5 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1996A 0 29,923 209,900 179,977 85.7 FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & 1 0 9,329 18,610 9,281 49.9 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 19980 B & 1 0 29,150 153,200 124,050 81.0 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 168,629 427,043 554,250 127,207 23.0 STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 0 69,579 629,325 559,746 88.9 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 0 9,161 158,375 149,214 94.2 11/09/1999 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 10 Months 83.3% Completed 2 Months 16.6* Remaining 13:15:43 Budget Expenditure Sununary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 I Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent STREET IMPROV B & 11998A 0 51,425 102,800 51,375 50.0 STREET IMPROV CONSTR. 1998A 0 433,573 421,886 -11o687 -2.8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 25,045 505,084 1,515,310 1,010,226 66.7 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 50,187 50,187 100.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 34,323 363f230 519,774 156,544 30.1 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 83,179 500200549 81312e490 3f291,941 39.6 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 467,177 1,377e604 21895,437 1,517,833 52.4 FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0 SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 246,362 1, 269, 348 1,902,919 633,571 33.3 WATER AND SEWER FUND 747,668 51516,508 7,937,556 21421,048 30.5 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 14,930 180,893 207,416 26,,523 12.8 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 77,579 802,744 1f061,785 259,041 24.4 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 108,456 649,626 1,094,509 444,8B3 40.6 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 2,100 42,033 70,650 28,617 40.5 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 152,971 2o139,638 30268,261 1,128,623 34.5 POLICE PENSION FUND 1240668 1,225r519 11469r0165 243r546 16.6 FIRE PENSION FUND 124,195 1r1.98F879 1,462t055 263J76 18.0 BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 2,827 28,333 34,000 5,667 16.7 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 0 0 0 0 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 0 7,990 40,980 32,990 80.5 SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER B& 1 0 0 0 0 Total All Funds 4,51,8.020 46r784t402 69,552,598 22,768,196 32.7 I 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:17:23 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Sununary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 Totals 5,800 81,441 95,431 13,990 14.7 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 5,800 81,441 95,431 13,990 14,.,7 Totals 5,800 81,441 95,431 13,990 14.7 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended PUBLIC REPRESENTATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 4,659 70,969 80,594 9,625 11.9 03 ADVISORY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS 1,141 10,472 14,837 hhhh 4,365 29.4 Totals 5,800 81,441 95,431 13,990 14.7 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 2,357 22,523 28,108 5r585 19.9 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 357 3,510 4,0223 613 14.5 52 OTHER EMPLOYER COSTS 0 0 200 200 100.0 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,893 49;897 53.r900 4,003 7.4 55 UTILITIES 46 369 400 31 7.8 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 147 5,042 8,600 3,558 41.4 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 Totals 5,800 81,441 95,431 13,990 14.7 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 5,800 81,441 95,431 13,990 14,.,7 Totals 5,800 81,441 95,431 13,990 14.7 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed X3:17 : 24 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 I Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended VILLAGE . . . ......... MANAGER'S OFFICE Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent W- PROGRAM TOTALS 01 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE 23,755 285,458 326,735 41,277 12.6 02 LEGAL SERVICES 3,492 168,943 251,000 82,057 32.7 03 PERSONNEL SERVICES 2,451 53,610 106,680 53,070 49.7 04 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS 13,423 92,931 137,685 44,754 32.5 05 PUBLIC INFORMATION 10,562 97,079 125,021 27,942 22.3 Totals 53,683 698,021 947,121 249,100 26.3 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION so PERSONAL SERVICES 26,051 290,95B 377,055 86, 0'9722.8 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 6,452 69,931 86,416 16,485 19.1 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 11843 23,333 32,650 9,317 28.5 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,814 291,882 4120440 120f558 29.2 55 UTILITIES 142 1,587 31400 1,813 53.3 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 381 12,202 26,510 14,308 54.0 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 8,128 81650 522 6.0 Totals 53,683 698,021 947,121 249,100 26.3 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 53,683 698,021 9471121 249,100 26.3 Totals 53,683 698,021 947,121 249,100 26.3 I 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3%- Completed 13.17:24 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months t 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 SOURCE OF FUNDS 00RAL FUND Totals 11,708 1411657 182,540 11r708 141,657 182,540 K, 40,883 22.4 40,883 22.4 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended TV SERVICES DIVISION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 TELEVISION SERVICES 11,708 141,657 177,540 35,883 20.2 03 OTHER SERVICES 0 0 5,000 5,000 100.0 Totals 11,,708 141,657 182,540 40,883 22.4 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 7,259 69,300 86,727 17,,427 20.1 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2,216 21,626 25,993 4,367 16.8 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 1,984 3,250 1,266 39.0 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,679 11,232 26,770 15,538 58.0 55 UTILITIES 287 2,406 3,200 794 24.8 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 267 6,969 8,100 1,131 14.0 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 28,140 28,500 360 1.3 Totals 11,708 141,657 182,540 40,883 22.4 SOURCE OF FUNDS 00RAL FUND Totals 11,708 1411657 182,540 11r708 141,657 182,540 K, 40,883 22.4 40,883 22.4 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:17:24 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months t 16.6W Remaining Department Budaet, Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 51 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ............. Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE 9,582 104,636 142,157 37,521 26.4 03 VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 3,187 3,187 0 -3,187 Totals 12,769 107,823 142,157 34,334 24.2 EXPEMI)ITURE 'CLASS 1YI CAT ION so PERSONAL SERVICES 5,388 57,741 69,250 11,509 16.6 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1f908 19,623 23,643 4,020 17.0 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 16 1,111 1,050 -61 - 5 . 8 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,250 20,488 37,714 17,226 45.7 55 UTILITIES 159 1,249 1,640 351 21.9 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 2,048 7,611 8,900 1t2 11 89 14.5 Totals 12,769 107,823 142,157 34,334 24.2 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 12,769 107,823 142,157 34,334 24.2 Totals 12,769 107,823 142,157 34,334 24.2 51 1.1/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 1.3 :17 :25 VILLAGE OF MOUNT T PROSPECT 2 Months t 16.6% Remaining Department ent B dget Expenditure Sununary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 56 INSURANCE 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT Totals R M F F FUNDS 001 GENERAL Totals 51,853 556,534 Cur Mcg Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended FINANCE DEPARTMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 32.4 8,136 961792 141,176 44,384 01 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION 14,327 165,673 205,090 39,417 19.2 02 ACCOUNTING 21,579 217,890 278,284 60,394 21.7 03 DATA PROCESSING 14,061 1.52,703 184,930 32,227 17.4 04 DUPLICATING SERVICES 127 12,864 16,200 3,336 20.6 05 INSURANCE PROGRAMS 19,261 197,717 2.35,078 37,361 15.9 06 CUSTOMER. SERVICES 20,051 21.5,821 278,015 62,194 22.4 07 CASH MANAGEMENT 2,661 27,035 32,705 5,670 17.3 Totals 92:067 989,703 1,230,302 240,599 19.6 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55 UTILITIES 56 INSURANCE 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT Totals R M F F FUNDS 001 GENERAL Totals 51,853 556,534 675,827 119,293 17.7 14,960 155,692 186,993 31,301 16.7 625 61454 9,550 3,096 32.4 8,136 961792 141,176 44,384 31.4 550 41712 5,000 288 5.8 15,100 1510006 181,206 30,200 16.7 843 17,356 28,550 11,194 39.2 0 1,157 2,000 843 42.2 92,067 989,703 1,230,302 240,599 19.6 92,067 989,703 92,067 989,703 0 1,230,302 240,599 19.6 1,230,302 240,599 19.6 11/09/1999 10 Months { 83.3W } Completed 13:17:25 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months { 16.6% Remaining Department Budget ExpenditureSummary 01/01/99 10/31/99 EXPENDITURE CLASS1VICATION N PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE J CONTRACTUAL 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & S.• 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT SOURCE• 001 GENERAL CAPITAL PR 5so DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST Totals 104,378 Cur Mo 1,339,496 1999 Unexpended Unexpended COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'Expended. Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 262,+688 52,228 19.9 786 13,030 01 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMIN 12,024 132,711 173,329 40,618 23.4 02 PLANNING & ZONING 16,277 148,082 229,135 81,053 35.4 03 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 3,644 47f152 73,072 25,920 35.5 05 BUILDING INSPECTIONS 46,353 407,771 523,893 116,122 22.2 06 HOUSING INSPEC'T'IONS 18,120 206,933 243,486 36,553 15.0 07 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 7,960 69,469 96,581 271112 28.1 EXPENDITURE CLASS1VICATION N PERSONAL SERVICES 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE J CONTRACTUAL 55 UTILITIES 57 COMMODITIES & S.• 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT SOURCE• 001 GENERAL CAPITAL PR 5so DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST Totals 104,378 11012,118 1,339,496 327,378 24.4 +65,735 668,406 87+6,963 208,557 23.8 21,129 210,460 262,+688 52,228 19.9 786 13,030 190085 6,055 31.7 14t525 98,547 147,045 48f498 33.0 959 11,062 19,040 7,978 41.9 1,244 81953 14,675 5,722 39.0 0 1,660 0 -11660 104,378 1,012,118 1,339,496 327,378 24.4 104,378 1,011071.8 1,339,096 0 0 0 0 400 400 104,378 1,012,118 1,339,496 N 327,37$ 24.4 0 0 327,378 24.4 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3* Completed 13:17:25 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months C 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CDBG Cur Mo Expended Y -T -D Expended 1999 Budget Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 04 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 536 9,313 28,909 19,596 67.8 05 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 2,744 22,639 67,850 45,211 66.6 06 ACCESSIBLTY & NEIGHBRHD IMPRV 0 29,425 159,651 130,226 81.6 07 CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHAB 7,44S 132,642 188,041 S5,399 29.5 Totals 10,725 194,019 444,451 250,432 56.3 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION so PERSONAL SERVICES 462 5, 537 18,926 13,389 70.7 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 74 3,378 5,593 2,215 39.6 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 152 780 628 80.5 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,744 22,805 70,145 47,340 67.5 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 so 1,315 1,235 93.9 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 7,445 132,642 188,041 55,399 29.5 64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 0 900 126,687 125,787 99.3 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 69 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 28,525 32,964 4,439 13.5 72 INTEREST EXPENSE 0 0 0 0 Totals 10,725 194,019 444,451 250r432 56.3 SOURCE OF FUNDS 070 COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 10,725 194,019 444,451 2500,432 56.3 Totals 10,725 194,019 4440,451 250,432 56.3 w 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13 :1 : 2 6 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budaet Expenditure Sunanary "No 01/01/99 - 1/31/99 8 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended HUMM SERVICES Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 81446 77,960 103J50 25,190 24.4 02 SOCIAL SERVICES 21,443 242,391 328,668 86,277 26.3 03 NURSING/HEALTH SERVICES 13,349 75,909 97,446 21,537 22.1 04 SENIOR PROGRAMS 5,438 54,,083 73,918 19,835 26.8 05 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 0 0 0 0 Totals 48,676 450,343 603,182 152,839 25.3 EXPENDITURE CLkSSITICATION' so PERSONAL SERVICES 27,916 298,939 383,458 84,519 22.0 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 8f026 82F682 1011, 3;3518,653 18.4 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 573 2o360 40975 2,615 52.6 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21560 43r981 640134 20,153 31.4 55 UTILITIES 522 41675 40930 255 55.2 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 7,079 15,554 37,150 21,596 58.1 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2,000 2,152 4,,000 1,848 46.2 G7 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 3o200 3,200 100.0 Totals 48,676 450,343 603,182 1520839 25.3 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 48,676 450,343 603,182 152,839 25.3 Totals 48,676 450,343 603,182 152,839 25.3 8 11109/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:17:26 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months c 16-6W Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Sununary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 POLICE Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 POLICE ADMINISTRATION 154,181 1,301,925 1,738,855 436,930 25.1 02 PATROL & TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 389,606 4,059,931 5,172,836 1,112,905 21.5 03 CRIME PREVTN & PUBLIC SERVICES 16,096 1601477 199,340 38,863 19.5 04 INVESTIGATIVE & JUVENILE PRGM 70,641 716,569 922,205 205,636 22.3 05 CROSSING GUARDS 2,052 15,480 27,230 11,750 43.2 06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 46,915 488,005 612,453 124,448 20.3 Totals 679,491 6,742,387 8,672,919 1r930,532 22.3 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 440,522 4,580,340 5,848,935 1,268,595 21.7 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 146,8594 1,144,254 1,519,178 374,924 24.7 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 4,803 52,044 76,000 23,956 31.5 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 77,956 880,330 1,096,710 216,380 19.7 55 UTILITIES 3,842 35,525 47,550 12,02S 25.3 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 20,489 40,107 70,516 30,409 43.1 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 490 5j770 5,980 210 3.5 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 2,495 4,017 1 8,050 4,033 50.1 80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 Totals 679,491 6,742,387 8,672,919 1,930,532 22.3 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 679,491 6,742,036 8f672,919 10930,883 22.3 060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 0 351 0 -351 090 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT 1996 0 0 0 0 Totals 679,491 6,742,387 8,672,919 1j9301532 22.3 9 11/09/1999 10 Months 4 83.3% Completed 13:17:26 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 �40 50 PERSONAL SERVICES Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended, Unexpended FIRE 51 Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 15, 209 720824 102,793 01 FIRE ADMINISTRATION 114,265 882,777 11257,879 375,102 29.8 02 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 339,064 3,670,705 4,591,433 920,728 20.1 03 FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY 0 10,126 15,130 5,004 33.1 04 FIRE PREVENTION 36,518 297,938 400,869 1021931 25.7 05 FIRE COMMUNICATIONS 684 35,797 45,750 9,953 21.8 06 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 29,778 308,393 389,712 81,319 20.9 07 EMERGENCY PREPARDENESS PRGM 343 10,496 15,36-1 4f871 31.7 08 PAID -ON-CALL PROGRAM 1,336 19,093 27,449 8,356 30.4 1,508,264 Totals 521,988 5,235,325 6,743,589 1,508,264 22.4 �40 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 344,841 3,801,372 4,837,845 1,0136,473 21.4 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 117,430 914j440 11210,036 295,596 24.4 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 15, 209 720824 102,793 29,969 29.2 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 28,717 305,607 395r010 89e403 22.6 55 UTILITIES 684 28,167 34r120 5f953 17.4 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 6,636 74,191 93,360 19,169 20.5 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 3,246 4t475 1,229 27.S 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 8,471 35,478 65,950 30,472 46.2 Totals 521.,988 5r235,325 6,743,589 11508,264 22.4 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 521,988 5,235,325 6,743,589 1,508,264 22.4 Totals 521r988 5o25r325 6r743,589 1r508,264 22.4 lu 1109/1999 10 Months 83.3%- Completed 13:17:27 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 M Cur Mo `Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended PUBLIC WORKS - ADMINISTRATION Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINSTRATION 86,803 869,764 1,053,415 183,651 17.4 Totals 86,803 869,764 11053,415 183,651 17.4 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 13,993 1420703 182,210 39f507 21.7 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7,147 72,326 87,487 15r161 17.3 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 2,536 16f715 19,014 2,299 12.1 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 611199 611p233 733,198 121f965 16.6 55 UTILITIES 1,072 14,644 13,947 -697 -5-0 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 395 8,770 100309 1,539 14.9 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 461 763 4p5001 3,737 83.0 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 2,610 2,750 140 5.1 Totals 86,803 869l764 11053j415 183,651 17.4 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 86,803 869,764 1,053,415 183,651 17.4 Totals 86o803 869,764 1,053,415 183,651 17.4 M 11/09/1-999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 2 Months 16.6* Remaining 13 : 17 : 2 7 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Department Buda...et Expenditure Su=arP- 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 1 50 PERSONAL SERVICES Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended PUBLIC WORKS STREETS/BLDGS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,204 318,599 376,615 01 STREET DIVISION ADMINISTRATION 6,812 105,289 119,829 14,S40 12.1 02 MAINTENANCE - PUBLIC BUILDINGS 49,442 505,782 581,251 75,469 13.0 04 STREET MAINTENANCE 21,768 428,881 400,329 -28,552 -7.1 05 SNOW REMOVAL 3,839 368,505 294,614 -73,891 -25.1 06 LEAF REMOVAL 10,529 32,188 143,860 111,672 77.6 07 STORM SEWER & BASIN MAINT 13,210 49,662 139,617 89,95S 64.4 08 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS 6,480 38,643 57(S91 18,948 32.9 09 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 9,145 81,520 86,99S 5,475 6.3 11 PARKING; T,nT MAINTENANCE14,930 001 109, 827 207, 416 97, 589 47.0 213,378 Totals 136,155 11720g297 21031,502 311j205 15.3 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 64,863 822,262 914,488 92F226 10.1 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 18,365 205,125 233,875 28,750 12.3 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,204 318,599 376,615 58,016 15.4 bs UTILITIES 187 6,693 21,300 14,607 68.6 56 INSURANCE 726 7,266 8,718 1,452 16.7 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 16,229 213,307 292,406 79,099 27.1 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 11,989 14,100 2,111 15.0 69 INF RAS 135,056 170,000 34,944 20.G Totals 136,155 1j7201297 2,031,502 311,205 15.3 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 121,225 1,512,708 1,726,086 213,378 12.4 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 0 971762 98,000 238 0.2 630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 14,930 109,827 207,416 97,589 47.0 Totals 136,155 1,720,297 2,031,502 311,205 15.3 kw� 111/09/1999 10 Months 83.3%- Completed 13 :17:27 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Sunmary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 PUBLIC WORKS FORESTRY/GRNDS Cur Mo Expended Y -T -D Expended 1999 Budget Unexpended unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 FORESTRY DIVISION ADMIN 10,841 127f729 163,996 36,267 22.1 02 MAINTENANCE OF GROUND 23,192 250,57S 2761106 25,S31 9.2 03 FORESTRY PROGRAM 39,375 445,903 564,829 118,926 21.1 04 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION 6,283 23,863 52,957 29,094 54.9 Totals 79,691 848,070 1,057,886 209,818 19.8 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 39,0 091 479,347 5460624 67,,277 12.3 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,308 126,313 146,029 19,716 13.5 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 0 1,215 1,,200 -15 -1.3 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 23,087 209,282 323,845 114,563 35.4 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 6,205 27,248 35,190 7,,942 22.6 66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 4,,665 5,000 335 6.7 Totals 79,691 848,070 1,057,888 209,818 19.8 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 79,691 848,070 1o048o288 200,218 19.1 690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 0 0 9,600 9,600 100.0 Totals 79,691 8480070 1j057,888 209j818 19.8 "N 11/09/1999 10 Months 4 83.3% Completed 2 Months 16.6% Remaining 13:17:28 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 50 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 112,000 21,271 19.0 52 01 ENGINEERING SERVICES 38, 513 396,964 531, 007 134,043 25.2 05 TRAFFIC CNTRL & STREET LGHTNG 7,766 142,102 413,379 271,277 65.6 Totals 46,,279 539r066 944,386 405,320 42.9 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 29,848 312,578 394,827 82,249 20.8 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 9,005 90,729 112,000 21,271 19.0 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 385 2,465 4,477 2,012 44.9 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,193 50,149 165t727 115,578 69.7 55 UTILITIES 0 70,197 155,100 84,903 54.7 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 848 11,119 12,655 1,536 12.1 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 2,600 2,600 100.0 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 1,829 2,000 171 8.6 69 INFRASTRUCTURE 0 0 95,000 95,000 100.0 Totals 46,279 539,r066 944,386 405,320 42.9 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 46,279 518,897 746,086 227,189 30.5 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND0 20,169 198,300 178,131 89.B Totals 46,279 539,066 944,386 405,320 42.9 w ll/p9/1999 13:17:28 10 Months 83.3% Completed VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRO 41PE= 2 Months t 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summar 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 1 PUBLIC WORKS WATER/SEWER Cur Mo Expended Y -T -D Expended 1999 Budget Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 WATER & SEWER DIVISION ADMIN 89,578 889,646 1,300,650 411,004 31.6 02 MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS 2,588 45,393 87,535 42,142 48.1 03 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 8,088 43,076 79,190 36,114 45.6 04 WATER SUPPLY MAINT & REPAIR 23,176 251,172 569,688 318,516 55.9 05 WATER DISTRBT MAINT & REPAIR 32,494 406,730 646,640 239,910 37.1 06 WATER VALVE/HYDRNT MAINT & REP 13,584 206,623 286,685 80,062 27.9 07 WATER METER MAINT & REPL 22,526 181,274 265,983 84,709 31.8 08 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 49,772 497,731 597,275 99,544 16.7 09 SANITARY SEWER MAINT & REPAIR 24,680 248,777 349,348 100,571 28.8 10 WATER & SEWER SYSTEM IMPROV 220,569 339,953 771,592 431,639 55.9 12 LAKE MICHIGAN WATER SUPPLY 260,613 2,406,133 21982,970 576,837 19.3 Totals 747,668 5,516,508 7,937,556 2,421,048 30.5 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION SO PERSONAL SERVICES 84,934 892,203 1,263,123 370,920 29.4 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 27,601 286,465 372,668 86,203 23.1 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 894 14,259 22,315 8,056 36.1 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 594,565 3,912,096 4,914,341 1,002,245 20.4 55 UTILITIES 839 61,302 133,500 72,198 54.1 56 INSURANCE 8,840 88,407 106,087 17,680 16.7 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 12,644 151,435 227t075 75,,640 33.3 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 22,803 62,,170 39,367 63.3 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 684 7,100 6,416 90.4 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 17,,151 67,415 172,077 104,662 60.8 68 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS 0 19,439 545,300 525,861 96.4 71 BOND PRINCIPAL 0 0 111,800 111,800 100.0 Totals 747,668 5,516,508 7,937,556 2,421,048 30.5 SOURCE OF FUNDS 510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 0 0 0 0 580 SSA #7 WHITE OAK/MEIER CONST 0 0 0 0 610 WATER AND SEWER FUND 747,668 5,516,508 7,937,556 2,421.,048 30.5 Totals 747,668 5,,516,508 7,937,556 2,421,048 30.5 w 11/09/1999 10 Months 83 .3% Completed 13 : 17 : 2 9 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 4 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DISPOSAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 REFUSE DISPOSAL PROGRAM 249,096 2,420,852 3,159,716 738,864 23 .4 Totals 249,096 2,424o852 31159,716 738j864 23.4 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 3,955 52,341 63,345 11,004 17.4 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 1,909 16,849 18,500 1,651 8.9 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 85 305 850 545 64.1 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 242,899 2,342,7B6 3,065,867 723r081 23.6 9 .5 UTILITIES 6 377 448 71 15.8 56 INSURANCE 242 2,422 2,906 484 16.7 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 5,772 7,800 2,028 26.0 Totals 249,496 2,420,852 3,159,716 738,864 23.4 SOURCE OF FUNDS 030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 249,096 2,420,852 3f159,716 738,864 23.4 Totals 249,096 2,420,652 3,159,716 736,864 23.4 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3%- Completed l3:17:29 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE MAINT Cur Mo Expended Y -T -D Expended 1999 Budget Unexpended Unexpended Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 VEHICLE DIVISION ADMINSTRATION 10,195 108,194 140,549 32,355 23.0 02 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 67,384 694,550 921,236 226,686 24.6 Totals 77,579 802,744 1,061,785 259,041 24.4 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION so PERSONAL SERVICES 37,150 395,491 496,961 101,470 20.4 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11,401 116,136 140,747 24,611 17.5 52 OTHER EMPLOYEE COSTS 199 1,729 2,700 971 36.0 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,219 33,116 51,516 18,400 35.7 55 UTILITIES 21 1,377 896 -481 -53.7 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 25,589 254,895 363,005 108,110 29.8 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 65 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 0 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 0 0 5,960 5,960 100.0 Totals 77,579 802,744 1f061o785 259,041 24.4 SOURCE OF FUNDS 660 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 77,579 802,744 1,061,785 259,041 24.4 Totals 778,579 802,744 1,061,785 259,041 24.4 17 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:17:29 VTLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 50 Cur Mo Y--T-D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 306 6.2 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 582 02 COMMUNITY GROUPS & MISC 0 32,167 52,900 20,733 39.2 03 4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENT'S, ETC 893 74,563 B9,350 14,787 16.5 04 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 53 8,376 64,872 56,496 87.1 05 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 276 2,279 2,050 -229 -11.2 Totals 1r222 117,385 209,172 91,787 43.9 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 154 27,194 27,765 571 2.1 51 EMPLOYEE 88NE�'ITS 65 4,6551 4*957 306 6.2 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 582 77o504 144,700 67,196 46.4 55 UTILITIES 0 240 10100 860 78.2 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 421 71696 20,650 12, 954 62.7 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 0 100 10,000 9,900 99.0 Totals 1,222 117r385 209 r 172 91,787 43.9 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 1,222 117,385 209,172 91,787 43.9 Totals 1, 222 117,385 209,172 91j,787 43.9 Or.] 114,09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13 : 17 :29 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months t 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 w Cur Mo, Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended unexpended CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 VILLAGE IMPROVEMENTS & EQUIP 55,302 411,219 905,856 494,637 54.6 02 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 5,174 366,043 1,122,448 756,405 67.4 03 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST 83,179 5,085,149 8,312,090 3,226,941 38.8 04 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 246,362 1,269,348 1,902,919 633,571 33.3 06 STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 476,237 3,183,014 5,475,761 2,292,747 41.9 07 POLICE/FIRE BUILDING CONST 0 0 0 0 09 MOTOR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 108,456 649,626 1,094,509 444,883 40.6 10 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 2,100 42,033 70,650 28,617 40.5 11 CAPITAL TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 Totals 976,810 11,006f432 l8r884v233 71877,801 41.7 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41,,969 214,609 293,300 78,691 26.8 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES 51,210 4,907,121 7,330,000 2,422,879 33.1 62 LAND IMPROVEMENTS 490 329,432 566,547 237,115 41.9 63 BUILDINGS 0 0 0 0 64 BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 18,239 56,686 127,900 71,214 55.7 6S OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2,100 130,617 414,998 2B4,381 68.5 66 MOBILE EQUIPMENT 108,456 678,199 1,122,509 444,310 39.6 67 OTHER EQUIPMENT 37,063 237,376 405,608 168,232 41.5 69 INFRASTRUCTURE 717,283 4,452,392 8,623,371 4,170,979 48.4 80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 Totals 976,810 11,0060432 1808841233 71877,,801 41.7 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 0 0 0 0 050 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 9,060 1,248,883 1,961,050 712,167 36.3 060 LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 1,108 8,628 0 -8,628 070 COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 0 0 0 0 080 ASSET SEIZURE FUND 0 0 60,320 60,320 100.0 Soo STREET IMPROV CONSTR 1998A 0 433,573 421,886 -11,687 -2.8 510 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 25,045 505,084 1,515,310 1,010,226 66.7 520 POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND 0 0 50,187 50,187 100.0 530 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 34*323 363,230 519,774 156,544 30.1 540 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 1998 0 0 0 0 550 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST 83,179 5,020,149 8,312,090 3,291,941 39.6 560 STREET IMPROVEMENT CONST FUND 467,177 1,377,604 2,895,437 1,517,833 52.4 570 FLOOD CONTROL CONST 1998A 0 0 0 0 580 SSA #7 WHITE OAK/METER CONST 0 0 0 0 590 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 246,362 1,269,348 1,902,919 633,571 33.3 630 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 0 71,066 0 -71F066 670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 108,456 649,626 1,094,509 444,8B3 40.6 680 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 2,100 42,033 70,,650 28,617 40.5 690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 0 17,208 80,101 62,893 78.5 Totals 976,810 11,0060432 18,884,233 7j8770801 41.7 w 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:17:30 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 EXPENDITURE 140 CONTRACTUAL Cur M4 BOND PRINCIPAL 1999 Unexpended unexpended DEBT SERVICE . Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 280 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & 11998B 290 DOWN TOWN REDEVL B& I 1999 300 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 02 DEBT SERVICE - PROPERTY TAXES 0 306,158 925,932 619,774 66.9 03 DEBT SERVICE - TAX INCREMENT 0 199,742 1,229,285 1,029,543 83.8 04 DEBT SERVICE - H/R. SALES TAX 1 168,629 546,637 1,634,740 1,088,103 66.6 05 DEBT SERVICE -- H/R. SALES 'TAX 2 0 130,165 890,.500 760,335 85.4 06 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA B & I 0 7,990 40,980 32,990 80 . 5 72,170 97.5 Totals 168,629 1,190t692 40721,437 3, 530,'745 74.8 EXPENDITURE 140 CONTRACTUAL 71 BOND PRINCIPAL 72 INTEREST EXPENSE 73 BANK D FISCAL FEES . D TRANSFERS Totals SOURCE CFFUNDS 140 PUBLIC WORKS FACILTY B&I 1987A 150 PUBLIC WORKS FACILT'Y B&I 1987E 160 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B&I 1991A 170 REFUND 87B & 91A B&I 1993E 240 DOWNTOWN R.EDEVLOPMNT B&I 1992E 250 OWNTO I REDEVLOPMNT B &I 19 9 3A 260 DOWNTOWN REDEVLOPM T B&I 1994E 270 DOWNTOWN R.EDE`+ILOPMNT B&I 1996E 280 DOWNTOWN REDEVL B & 11998B 290 DOWN TOWN REDEVL B& I 1999 300 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1991A 310 FLOOD CONTROL B & I 19 9 2A 320 REFUNDING FLOOD 91A B&I 1993E 330 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 1994A 340 FLOOD CONTROL B&I 19 9 6A 350 FLOOD CONTROL - 1998A B & I 360 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP 1998C B & I 380 EPA FLOOD LOAN B&I 410 STREET IMPROVEMENT B&I 1994A 420 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS B&I 1996A 430 STREET IMPROV B & I 1998A 810 SSA. ##1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B&I 830 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B&I 840 SSA #7 WHITE OAK/METER B & I 0 0 0 0 118,180 271,837 2,961,510 2,689,673 90.8 50,449 686,344 11521,560 835,216 54.9 0 4,376 12,250 7,874 64.3 0 228,135 226,117 -2,018 -0.9 168,629 111.90,692 4,721,437 3,530,?45 74.8 0 0 125,000 1.25,000 100.0 0 1270486 126,036 -1,450 -1.2 0 970753 98,216 463 0.5 0 80,863 576,680 495,817 86.0 0 56 0 -56 0 36,515 378,630 342,115 90.4 0 1.,840 74,010 72,170 97.5 0 11,819 148,440 136,621 92.0 0 2,469 4,590 21121 46.2 0 1.17,949 470,415 352,466 74.9 0 2,840 1,865 -975 -52.3 0 17, 622 360j615 342r993 95.1 0 38,872 307,320 268,448 87.4 0 21,008 182,180 161,172 88.5 0 29,923 209,900 179,977 85.7 0 9,329 18,610 9,281 49.9 0 29,150 153,200 124,050 81.0 168,629 427,043 554,250 127,207 23.0 0 69,579 629,325 559,746 88.9 0 9,161 158,375 149,214 94.2 0 51,42S 1.02,800 51,375 50.0 0 0 0 0 0 7,990 40,980 32,990 80.5 0 0 0 0 168,629 1,190,692 4,721,437 31530,745 74.8 461 11/fl9/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13 : 17 :3 1 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months c 16 .6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 RETIREE PENSIONS Cur Mo Expended Y -T -D Expended 1999 Budget Unexpended Unexpended 0 11,330 8,000 -3,330 Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 2,985.370 516,219 17.3 1r642 16,420 01 MISCELLANEOUS PENSIONS 4,469 44,753 54,250 9,497 17.5 02 POLICE PENSIONS 124,668 11225,519 1,469t065 243,546 16.6 03 FIRE PENSIONS 124,195 1,198,879 10462$055 263,176 18.0 Totals 253,332 2,469,151 2,985,370 516,219 17.3 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 53 PENSION BENEFITS 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Totals SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND 710 POLICE PENSION FUND 720 FIRE PENSION FUND 730 BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND Totals 253,332 2,457,821 2,977,370 519,549 17.4 0 11,330 8,000 -3,330 -41.6 253,332 2,469o151 2,985.370 516,219 17.3 1r642 16,420 20,250 3,830 18.9 124,668 1o225,519 1,469,065 243,546 16.6 124,195 1,198,879 1,462,055 263,176 18.0 2,827 28,333 34,000 5,667 - - --------- 16.7 253,332 21469f151 2,985,370 516,219 17.3 21 11/09/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13 : 17 : 31 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months t 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 W10 Cur Mo Y- -E 1999 Unexpended Unexpended RISK MANAGEMENT Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 01 CASUALTY & PROPERTY INSURANCE 4,500 511,364 661,680 150,316 22.7 02 MEDICAL INSURANCE 148,471 1,611,066 2,516,860 905,814 36.0 Totals 152,971 2,122,430 3,178,560 1,056,130 33.2 EXPENDITURE CLASS IR: CATION' 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,863 4,863 41,500 36,637 88.3 56 INSURANCE 151,108 2,117,567 3,137,060 1,019,493 32.5 80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 0 0 0 Totals 1521971 2,122, 430 3,178f560 It 056,13 33.2 SOURCE OF FUNDS 690 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 152,971 2,122,430 3,178,560 1f056,130 33.2 Totals 152,971 2r1221430 31178r560 1, 056,13033.2 W10 11/X9/1999 10 Months 83.3% Completed 13:17:31 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 Months 16.6% Remaining Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended unexpended NON -DEPARTMENTAL Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent Totals 500 1,508,174 1,926,390 418,216 21.7 500 1,508,174 1f926f390 418,216 21.7 EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION 50 PERSONAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 51 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 0 0 0 53 PENSION BENEFITS 0 83 0 -83 54 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 0 0 0 57 COMMODITIES & SUPPLIES 0 0 0 0 59 OTHER EXPENDITURES Soo 114,896 0 -114,896 80 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 1,393,195 1,926,390 533,195 27.7 Totals Soo 1,508,174 1,926,390 418,216 21.7 SOURCE OF FUNDS 001 GENERAL FUND Soo 1,508,174 1,926,390 418,216 21.7 Totals Soo 1,r508,174 1,926,390 418,216 21.7 w 11/09/1999 10 Months 4 83.3% Completed 2 months 16.6% Remaining 13:17:31 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Department Budget Expenditure Summary 01/01/99 - 10/31/99 Kv, Cur Mo Y -T -D 1999 Unexpended Unexpended MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY Expended Expended Budget Balance Percent PROGRAM TOTALS 02 LIBRARY SERVICES 0 0 4,225,000 4f225,000 100.0 Totals 0 0 4r225r000 4,225,000 100.0 EXPENDITURE CLASSIrICATION, 90 COMPONENT UNIT EXPENDITURES 0 0 4,225,000 41225,000 100.0 Totals 0 0 41225,000 41225o000 100.0 SOURCE OF PUNDO 950 MOUNT PROSPECT LIBRARY FUND 0 1 0 4,225,000 4,100.0225, 000 Totals 0 0 4,225,000 4,225,000 100.0 Kv, :. � � ~~` � `•'"., r"a"y. � � /�Y �r � �' �w �] mow'' u����•�'�.. � wC"� IND 1%0 ft4 to � r►� Q r►� y � lid0 CL a. 00 �r Fr r �. �. �r �r � • c� w tJ1 tI1 Urw t,A Uti •� .p. t,A !!r Vr U •� Vr U't V1 •� A C� C,.� C► C3 00 :-•1 6 ►-► -wJ hJ -J CJ hJ • � �1• rJ � Ch Vr •� N -� •.1 C? � vC7 � C!r C7 -� Cllr '"" vCA �4 hJ W t p 00C :+ �,b W LA k �l..rJj 00 V N �.w �.� 1 ice+ ""►� F� 1�+ Ci'1 -4 to -4 i� Fes+ Ci CJh i-� F -+kA 8 F..+ 00 00 1*0 vC? 00 C� ' '` '""' �+•r� F.s N W W t.�1 4 QQ * `b Mew �[►J CSD --+ �+ 00VG N :PAI CT Ir-+ N r-•+ 00 CT M-+ 4 � � vCy •� -J �V�7 th C?1 rA VI 00 00 00W vp 'wci w os cT CT CT NG 0 t ft N► bd 'V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V i vt3 •1� V1 W V1 r+ W �7 Crr% OC .' U M�ryr+ � W V , M■+ W W .rw% r :� +i Mrr+ Ir 00 V 1 Fr+ 00 N Mme+ OQ00 klotv W W tit f\y%Ty©� +�YIy� k4c) M_+ Chi Qr M.r+ 00 ko 00 00 W �.0 VC3 C3 tiC Clti U1 C1 tir �C V V V V V V V�r�y V v V V V V V v V N M.+ 1�;y t,J"M W C?1 l.%1 twi"1 W Mr.+ "� " J 8 ON" F..+ tw.i W �Lr3 1—+ M...+ F■.+ ..1 00 w "%0C� .p► W W W G.7 V0 00 4 G4 � • NO W[00 Fr+ C/hl Fes+ CT 0 00 b fir✓ ', r.T � V M..+ �r.r+ V l.%1 �V , W 4.i �y:" � � �+ l !? 0 1'•••' '•:fir VO G7 V7 +�C to c� clEn CA CA� lid OTJ 9L CA (A y ra► gra ur w W W tj W N w t t� c� c'�► c5 w En Lift LA LA tA LhtA LlhcA UtLAUlUft O a C� Ch h w•i. CN W W t•�l •p ter ur 00 � 00 -4 tA tA -Ail 'V "V V V V V V V V 1I V V V N M.•' � .�, Uhl t,J'1 U'1 CJ Q: � � �) W W �f3 00 00 W C7 W vCi �,p r • • • iMy • • • • • y •••yy uclCr %7l vcCn3 V00 00 -J -.4 -4 0eo > i os trN. rCpw-Ph V 1%0 V 1%0 % V N 1%0 so J -.•a to Cb C" -A6 W C; ► C7 l� w-+ •A t.Jl t,J1 04 I-+ 01% VC? �c�7 00 �+ W W No ' 10 00 00 C7 CT w N Ch 1.40 as A Ott t "%0 -Al. i 00 00 •J -4 -4 %0 -4 0 N � �7 to U1 �o '%C N NCT 1%0 -4 -J 4 CT A �+ Ch w hJ C7 ►—� l—+ � 4�6 Vn kA W os -4 0 -J 00 1.03 k.0 00 00 t.►1 hJ W N slG 46 lsCo • r • r r • • • r • • • **C3 1,0 C) 0 �+ F•.. vC7 C5 � M••+ C7 � � �1J �C �C V7 C'� C'7 �► C7 •P � Cr7 C� � ci 4�6 M I tA O. -A 8 i C7 C3 C5 C5 C.7 C3 V1 t,lt C'0 uJ hJ "-.i C'J � 4 I ci n ," p? �►. p� �•., tr14 �.,,,, 03.� rte+• � two Ci Isms" Im-+ Imm" CA CA� if y 4. 4 Ca lid CAW � , • 00 i El�p ,OWN � M � taw ' 00 1 -ma oo � ,,,,. ,, � ° 00 00 %0 w w w 0 w w CA � t%j LA cn LA LA uw car 120 w -4 CT► w -.4 c.►ti W.J oo � tri -%aLA w I uw � w7 n w.• � c n �.• c; i iw� ,w -r ,r.�. co UftA.w -.� to Aw� me 1 4%* 4Lft � ra INO %0 SII • � • \'+� 1.� •'+� '� � � I • � ■ `�� ' • y 1 y 00 1 1 -Al +v+'� w 00 `-P, w ....a Y� Vw�V�0�A/ 00 0 Vw� /V0 /0�LA � VVV�\ "�V �y�y��' lF��+ � \✓� VA SMV �11Y� S � � � • • I \/■ � �i • • •Lh 'r/ ■ ,a�ys,, /0/•�0, MVy _0t� /Wht�l%+j U3 OS • • fr♦' 00 �O 00 T' V V W W V■ "�"' W V V m00 °''° ,",Rye, /I� • r r /IVI� ,",,"f�'y�, ,i,��y%, • • r �, S /,V�yA,, r r•M�y •/� r w CD V � `�.�✓' V � R� � lam✓ V � r✓ V � � � �W� r/M��� r/� V ! V � I 0�M� 0 WM C W Vr/ I V♦ W ��y�w� V■ V■ wrr/ r r y✓ �✓ Lh LA LA to -4 -.4 � �M.✓ kyr/ I ci tA CD . . .............. Ci tv IT] IT] (D RL FAL acs A 0 ll ITI oo PA Cot' 00 00 %0 %A tit Uft tA tA tA kA (.A tA kwh tA U% 0 0 kA 00 w "Os CS 01% 00100 tA 00 00 = CYS w V � " " log 0 kA L 01% A 1*0 to tI § 0 00 0 Q 00 1�0 1%0 No so %a 00 -4 0 ON Ch 00 " kA NO � tA LA 00 00 ;..A VO --4 00 Q 0 00 hJ Os Os 1%0 Os 0 0 Cir P6 t1i 00 1ka0 1. W0 10 10 00 00 %0 w %a 4 00 0." 0 Os cs Ul LA 00 00 00 LA w 1*0 to 00 000 ci 4 • ff 0 v pal 0 O -A -..I vils 1:11 i� 41- F-. la & In fill i P -A 11 110" 0000 t t 00 w o t l p low" 00 00 4h. :01 w1w 00 81:8 --A .=1 IN= �o vko -4 00 0"o 110 Coca .Im el'am LON LOW No w LA -P6 40kb LA w %0 %0 Pk t*.%i MD LA 00 (7s 0 O -A bj 00 Lh Uft -.4 N) �o th No V 00 W 8 w 00 -4 %0 14C lc� tit -P& 0 0 41- 1� so to .06 .9b.. 00 00 000000 00 t 4N. -tkil C* 00 1100100 00 (v NO 1%0 bo ba w C) 0 14 No 0 ol W c CD 4N. C; CA C4 W cn cn En CA Et. 0 N N N %1D N 00 "IlIll'o > > > t -j tA -4 U1 -4 w 10 00 0 tA 0iw LA 8 ILA tA P6 00 00 O's •ur OWO OWO 40k, 4;k- 00 00 090 090 00 00 i W 00 ke -4 f"Oo 0 wad W tjCIS as w CN 1ILA cc 00 00 0 LA as 00 00 00 00 W -j (71 "1 %0 Lft tA I'D kt) 110 wkD qD kA %0 w %0 tA P* .06 00 ip -4 .06 10 00 l Cn 1" 00 w 8 -A6 Q 00 00 .a !D 406 00 00 00 Q 00 ;z :ollll. ;-A w 00 t,a OWO w 0 0--A 0 wr+ C� C� w� C.� w�+ � ."� �+ y pie 0 tA Lh kA :4Z CA CA CA CA CA cn CA CA CA w CA 10 1 CA w w cn En CA w CA CA 6's a. S. �o ND NO No -4 owd Old ;:5 " w tlj NJ Na W00 \1r/00 0000 IX %0 00 00 �o 00 00 �o tA w t4 tj W w 0 0 th to I 00 kA w %.0 to to tA to to .41 tA to th to • 140 16 tj 0 w -Al. 8 -.1 _4 C> �o LA -.4VC3 00 'No �o LA \0 W \0 00 -P. w � LA W tJ •A., O00 CD LA W ON (A tA %0 110 00 ON UN kA ON -4 00 -4- .06 �o00 %0 N-0 00 ;k W . CS " C� N:) \0 \0 I C� I' 14 w V NO -4 -0 -4 00 00 %NO as to P-4 W " 8 LA 0 �o to 00 LA -j Pk w a, w 00 Os O-A N 0-" 00 Ch COD 41 10 0 0 0 :.A ION,00 w w Iw -.a 00 %0 P., to 0 w \0 00 ION 1.0 as Lft Uft 00 1*0 %0 \0 \0 LA V %# 10 W li W e5n tA 'T'7 00 W w 0 ON ON W kA jw w w "41* kA 00 ON Co 00 0" , �01 s-" = <= 0 kA -4 1[ -4 -:8 -4 ON Uft tA W 00 •A., CCS I I %ftwol N%000 Nftol %%Moe CD Lh CAC�C�C�C�CA CA En V) Gn WA bog* CA W CA CA CA W Eta Et. 6.0 6. Et. 6. No %0 00 %D 00 00 %0 00 00 00 00 %0 t4 0-" W w 1-" w N" " 0.� 1� 0 w W W t -A Lh Lft to LA Uft (A (A tA tA th tA iA o � -4 -Ph- I -P. Z 6 A 6 .4 Ci tv 00 00 0 w -4 w kA tA LA 00 0." 1." w w %0 luil w Lft Ch 088888 Is -0 W 14 V uj w w w 0 C> -4 iii ;9 8 41k6- 44- bs 00 w 1 W -Pik -P6 1.0 -P6 00 w ul.P .P w w%0 %0 W W w CN -A6 00 -P6 w w 14 tA tA kA W %0 00 (44 lw w (ON uj %0 v -P6 W- .1 N .PU3 00 4 - W uj W W LA w 00 00 %0 SGT:w uj w k0 0% %wJ w I -P, •Pb 00 00 %0 C7 v�w -.4 -.4 -4 -4 w -P6 W -PA %0 1-4 00 -P, tA Qft LA ON LA t LA 0 0 0 -P6 !7s b a 0 0 0 0 0 s 00 Oo ON ON 0 > ci -P6 Lh %0• C7 C7 0 0 o 06 --4 0 Z�h -4 0 0 NO a N w U3 pp- Im WIN] O -A 00 tA (.A 00 z4o it ! r�6 zz w %A P -A om& 00 Q tA 00 kA 00 w os tv _W4 -4 kA wrye, to kA CN kA �-1 �W" 40 P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N GEOGRAPHY AWARENESS WEEK November 14 — 20, 1999 WHEREAS, a working knowledge of geography is imperative for students and citizens who wish to be able to compete in our increasingly global culture; and WHEREAS, rapidly changing technology such as computer based Geographic Information Systems and Global Positioning Systems are becoming common in the work place; and WHEREAS, environmental challenges will continue to confront, demanding new solutions based on a sound foundation in the core geographic principles of people, places, regions, and their interactive processes; and WHEREAS, it is important that our schools and our homes be places of life-long geographic learning; and WHEREAS, the major professional geography associations, such as the Association of American Geographers, the National Council for Geographic Education, the Illinois Geographic Alliance, and the National Geographic Society, wish to promote and celebrate the teaching and learning of geography across the nation during National Education Week, NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim November 14 through 20, 1999 as GEOGRAPHY AWARENESS WEEK in Mount Prospect, and I encourage each citizen, teacher, and student to consider the importance of geography in our daily lives, and to seek more and better ways to promote geographic education in our schools and in our homes. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST,,, Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Dated this 10th day of November, 1999. ............. ..................... INS A 1860 0 4 6 0 Op - a J W J Building Code Issues: The proposed, church would have a total floor area, of 1,883 sq. ft. with the following spaces used for calculating occupancy: upstairs -289 sq. ft,.* nave -289 sq. ft.; narthex -78 sq. ft.; basement -492 sq. ft. (1,148 sq. ft.). The current, e *el, 1 fing he ,ght for, the basement is'711 1)"* 'The 1,996 BOCA National Building Code specifies a minimum height for 1 that space of 7' 6". Use of the basement space will require raising the structure by approximately 18 inches — to meet the ceiling height minimum and to allow for a drop ceiling and mechanical equipment. The site plan shows provisions for emergency and handicap access to the basement. Parking: The zoning code requires 14 parking spaces for the 40 -seat church. The revised site plan shows 18 spaces for the site, not counting the existing garage. The parking lot has been relocated to maximize its distance from neighboring residential properties. The 14 -space requirement is based on the zoning code minimum standards. As the proposal is a Conditional Use, the Board may require a greater number of spaces, if they find that the minimum standard is inadequate for the proposed use. However, adding more spaces would force the lot closer to adjacent residences. Traffic Count: No changes from prior report. Platting: The subject property currently consists of two County tax parcels and is not a platted lot of record. Approval and recordation of a plat of consolidation will be required before issuance of building permits for the site. Landscape Issues: The applicant has included conceptual landscape plans with the revised site plan. Landscape Plans meeting all requirements of Zoning Code Article 23 will be required with the building permit submission. At a minimum, Article 23 will require 5% of the total pavement area devoted to interior planting areas, a screen/buffer a minimum of 6' in height with shade trees at 50' spacing around the parking lot perimeter adjacent to residential areas, a continuous screen/buffer a minimum of 3' in height between the parking area and Golf Road, and foundation plantings. ZBA 29-99 Hyung Jae Church — Conditional Use November 5, 1999 Page 2 The proposal includes a wood, fence along the west property, line and, along a, portion of the rear (south.) property, line. Several ofthe neighboring properties to the south have fing i exisfences, wh-ch would haveto be retnoved for the church to put a wood fence in that area. The petitioner has been advised that they must either get the neighbors to allow them to remove the existing fence and replace it with a new wood fence or provide a continuous 6' hedge in that location. The Village Board had inquired whether it would be appropriate to send the petition back to the ZBA in light of the changes that have been made since they previously reviewed this matter. While it is clearly within the Village Board's prerogative to do so, I do not believe that it is necessary to send this petition back to the ZBA since the majority of the changes that the petitioner has made have been in response to issues raised during the public process. If the petitioner had pursued the building addition that they raised at the last meeting, then I would have recommended that they go back to the ZBA. However, I do not believe that their current proposal is so different from what the ZBA considered and therefore does not warrant their review. /JP W J. Cooney Ir., AICP H:\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 1999\MEJ Memos\ZBA-29-99 Memo (Hyung Jae3) mej memo.doc KJOHN Y. KIM & ASSOCIATES, INC. Architects and Planners S6 59 W. Seegers Road, Arlington Heights, IL 60005 a (847) 364-0006 a Fax (847) 364-7772 November 3, 1999 Mr. William J. Cooney, Jr. Director of Community Development VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: Hyung Jae Methodist Church Dear Mr. Cooney: During our last meeting, issues were raised regarding the above captioned project. This letter is to surnmerize and clarify those following issues: 1.) The site plan has been revised as attached (sheet dated 10/28/99) in order to save existing trees at the rear yard. A new parking lot with eighteen car spaces is to located at the west side of the lot. 2.) If the storm water detention for d1is 41,300 sq. ft. of property is required, the petitioner will provide such facility as per village code. 3.) A landscaping plan will be submitted at a later date for village approval. Fences (existing and new) - new screening to be shown on the landscaping plan. 4.) Existing garage to remain astwo car parking garage and no other use of facility. 5.) Existing I '/2 story frame building to be raised to meet required minimum ceiling height of basement space. 6.) If church membership increase: in the future,, the church may require the additional space to the existing facility. The petitioner may submit the building permit for addition and alteration for the facility at that time. If you have any questions or comments please contact me. Very truly yours, JOHN Y. KIM & ASSOCIATES, LTD., Y. Kim prif GOLF ROAD I — I ito be N C- L -V6 60 N 0,11 T 11, PRUMINARY 10/28/99) SITE. PLAN low If ROM DRAWN BY DATE: INC. F JOHN Y. KIM & ASSOCIATES, MINC l Architects and Planners 901 W. GOLF ROAD I 59 W. Seegers Rd., Arlington Heights, IL 60005 9- it OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS ..,Ljg �7,3644M6 * Fax (847) 364-7772, 71v �y YM J, ON 4 Q ~ \{/�•-`-\i ^_` ■ . . `\QIt :\\ %/` ` `•: , \y � • � . � \ y \ � . . • , � ` \ VILLAGE 0,1. ivIOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department M E MORAN D UM TO: MICHAEL JANONIS., VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: Df RECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 101�1111"!11 I 1 6 6 a 11�1 I q RE: ZBA 29-99 CONDITIONAL USE FOR CONVERSION OF A SINGLE-FANULY RESIDENCE TO A CHURCH 901 W. GOLF ROAD REVERAND HYUNG SAHN (APPLICANT) Several area residents spoke agai"nst the proposed church at the ZBA meetin . The residents concerns were 9 Ry relaced to, traffic and congestion, possibleloss of privacy due to the church, light intrusion from vehicles primarl and, parking 1,ot, lighting at the church, and, thei, , op"n"lon that, a church, is not compatible with adjacent residential pr oI erfies. Theresi'dents a1so presented a, pet""" 10 a ,P i ition oppos,ing the church. One resident, spoke infav or, of the church. The Zoning Board members discussed the merits of the residents' objections to the proposal. 'The Zoming Board, IN agreed with staff s analysis that the proposal would create 11 , We or no additi"onal traffic,, and that any new, traffic would use Golf Road, rather than local streets. The ZBA reviewed landscaping and lighting requirements for sion no adjacent, roperties, parking lots and stated, their opinion that those requirements,, would prevent, light "ritru 0 p The ZBA also stated their opinion that the potential for nuisances, and loss of pri,,Vacyto neighbors was, probably greater from a having another family next door than from this sma,11 ch,urch. Finally, thye, ,bers discussed. the location, of ext'sting churches in the Village and stated that nearly all of` the were located, in, resident.'i"al neighborhoods without having a detrimental eff6lct on those neighborhwods. Following that disous,slon,,,,,,the,Zon,*ui,g Board of Appeals members voted, 4-0 to recommend approval ofa request for Conditi"onal Use, appro�val. forth,e a conversion of an ex"sung single-family residence to a church, at 901 W. Golf Road with, thefollowing condnions, I Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by John Y. Kim & Assoc.,, Inc., dated, July 12, 19 ,99 (Attachment 1). 2. Maintain the ex,ist"I; reside tial character of the building elevations. 3. Addition of 5 parking spaces to the site, for a total of 14, exclusive of the garage. 4. S,ubmission of" a final landscape plan rneetin,g all requirements of Zoning Code, Article 23. 5. Submittal and approval of final Engineering Plans meeting all Development Code requirements and/or approval by, the Plan Comm, iss,ion of any necessaryDevelopment Code,, ExcepItions. 60, SubmilItta-1 of final building plans meeting, all appiticable Building Code and, Fire Code requirements. T Approval of approprialte p'e"rmItts by, I.DWO.T. and M.W.R.D. 09=1 t Ili P H:\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 19991MEJ Mcmos\ZBA-29-99 Memo (Hyung Jac) mej memo.doc VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department M E M 0 R A 0 TOO MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPE ARLENE JURACEI(I CHAIRPERSON FROM: JEFF PERK]NS9 PLANNE LVATE: SEPTEMOBER 17, 1"9 0 HEARING DATE, SEPTEMBER 23, 1999 -SUBHCT: ZBA-29-99/COND ONAL USE FOR THE ESTABLLSMMENT OF A CHURCH IN ANENISTINGSINGLE4WAMNRES11DENCE, Petitioner: liyung Jae Methodist Church 5135 W.Diversey Chicago, IL 60639 Property Address: 901 W. Golf Road Status of Petitioner: Contract Purchaser of the Property Parcel Numbers: 08-14-202-019 08-14-202-020 Lot Size: 1.12 acres Existing Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residence Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence Lot Coverage: 19% proposed 75% maximum per R- 1 district (non-residential land use) Requested Action: Conditional Use to allow conversion of an existing single-family residence to a church. BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED COND ONAL USE The subject site is a 34,000 square foot property that currently contains a 1,883 square foot residence. The Hyung Jae Methodist Church has contracted to purchase the property and intends to convert the building to a 40 -seat church with associated office and all-purpose room functions. The site would be served by a nine -space parking lot and two additional spaces in the existing garage. The site plan also includes a 6' wood fence around the site perimiter. The Petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to allow the conversion of the existing single-family residence to a church. As illustrated on the attached site plan, the church would be set back 62 feet from Golf Road, 11.5 feet From the east (side) property line, and over 100 feet from the rear and west property lines. The parking lot would be set back 30 feet from Golf Road and at least 65 feet from adjacent properties. NIOUnt Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of September 23, 1999 ZBA-29-99 Page 2 To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, plotplan, and elevations and visited the site. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: North: R-1 Single-family Residence/ Single-family Residences South: R-1 Single-family Residence/ Single-family Residences East: R-1 Single-family Residence /Single-family Residences West: R -I Single Family Residence /Fann Stand Approval Process The subject site is in the R-1 Single-family Residence zoning district. "Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of worship" are listed as Permitted Uses in the R-1 district except when a residential unit is converted to a church or when the site is less than 40,000 square feet. Conditional Use approval is required when either of those conditions apply to a proposed church. As both of those conditions apply to the subject property, the proposed church will require a Conditional Use approval by the Village Board, following a public hearing and recommendation by the Zoning Board of Appeals. As the Church would be a Conditional Use, future expansions of the Church on the existing site would require approval of a new Conditional Use. Structure and Elevations The proposed use would occupy the existing structure and no significant alterations to the elevations are proposed. Thus, the existing residential character of the structure will be maintained. Parking Section 142224 lists a parking requirement for Churches of one space per 3 worshipers. As proposed, the church would seat forty worshipers, for a total requirement of 14 parking spaces. The proposal includes a nine -space parking lot and two additional spaces in an existing garage for a total of 11 spaces. The two garage spaces will not be available to worshippers and therefore should not be counted toward required parking. Thus, the site as proposed, does not meet its requirement for parking spaces. In the event that the church is approved, five additional spaces must be added to the site to meet zoning requirements. Landscape Plan The applicant has not submitted landscape plans with the Conditional Use application. Landscape Plans meeting all requirements of Zoning Code Article 23 will be required with the building permit submission. At a minimum, Article 23 will require 5% of the total pavement area devoted to interior planting areas, a screen/buffer a minimum of 6' in height with shade trees at 50' spacing around the parking lot perimeter adjacent to residential areas, a continuous screen/buffer a minimum of 3' in height between the parking area and Golf Road, and foundation plantings. The proposed fence will help to meet some of the parking lot screening requirements, but additional landscape materials will be required. Traffic Generation and Safety The proposed church is located on Golf Road. Most of the vehicles arriving at or departing the site w,1'11 use Golf' Road rather than travelling local streets. Using figures in the ITE Traffic Generation M"anual, 2"d ed,,,,,,, the existing Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of September 23, 1999 ZBA-29-99 Page 3 single-family residence generates approximately 10 vehicle trips, perday, or 70 per week. The manual " does not include estimate of traffic generation for Churches. Based full attendance fbr the, proposed 40 seats,, if the church members visited the site an average of three times per week with two people per, car, the church would. generate about 60 vehl*cle. trips per week under this scenario. nus, the, pro posalwould generate less traffic than the existing, house. Also, the church will generate trips primarily at off-peak times (Sunday momingsand Weekday evenings), Based on these facts, the proposal would not have a detrimentat effect, on traffic or safety., Comprehensive Plan Designation 'T,, he Vi'llage's Comprehensive,Plan designates the property -for single family residential uses. As the Zoning code establ s es hurches as appropriate uses in residential districts, the proposed church is an appropriate use within his d,esipationx. Review by other Village Departments The proposal has been reviewed by the Village Fire Department, Engineering Division, and Building Division, which have the following comments regarding the proposal., The Engineering Division has reviewed the preliminary plans and stated that, at a minimum, stormwater detention must be provided for the new parking lot, and that IDOT and MWRD permits will be required. The proposed conversion will also require compliance with the Development Code for the entire site. ile Mire Department has reviewed theproposal and, stated that, the change of use will require, that the bull,d,m*g must be sprinklered throughout. Ibe Fire Code will also require that a fire alarm system., fire extinguishers, and emergency 11"ghtingbei installed, prior of occupancy of the structure as a church. Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: u The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; u The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; * c3 Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and 13 Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The applicant proposes to establish a Church on a residential parcel along a major arterial roadway. The proposed Church will be similar to a single-family residence in terms of traffic generation and lot coverage and residential character of the structure will be maintained. Thus the proposed Church will be similar in intensity to the current use and would have little or no negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements (when an additional 5 parking spaces and required landscaping are added). The neighborhood is developed as a single-family residential area. The small size of the church ensures that it will have little potential for injuring the use, enjoyment, or value of the neighborhood or impeding its orderly development. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of September 23, 1999 ZBA-29-99 Page 4 RECONMENDATION Theproposed church meets, the, Conditional Use standards contained, 'in, Sectlion, 14,203.F.8 oft Zontn ig Ordnance. Based on these findings,, Staff recornmends, that, the Z,B,A make,, a recommendation, to the Village Board to ADn"Ve a, Conditional Use, for the conversion, of an existing single-family residence to a church, 90 1,, E. Golf Road, Case No. ZBA-29-99, wil,th the fol,loi nd, wing co Mons: I Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by John Y. Kim & Assoc., Inc., dated July 12, 1999 (Attachment 1). 2. Maintain the existing residential character of the building elevations. 3. Addition of 5 parking spaces to the site, for a total of 14, exclusive of the garage. 4. Submission of a final landscape plan meeting all requirements of Zoning Code Article 23. S. Submittal and approval of final Engineering Flans meeting all Development Code requirements and/or approval, by, the Plan Commission of a n y nece�ssary Development CodeExceptions, 6. Submittal of final building plans, meeting aflapplicable Buildihg Code and, Fire, Code reqwrements. 7. Approval ofapppop riate permi,ts by, I.D.O.T. and MUM.` R.D. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: 1 il i-11111"jil , iiiiiji 111!1! :��i 11:zll� lurfu A # '" W M11011!111 7z W9 H \GEMPLNG2BA\ZBA 1999Staff Mwm\ZBA-29-99 Memo (Hytmg Jae).doc ci �l e. lHok I OO-ow, W D 04 "s M CD In WIN IN min Win WIMMINNINNIN IN min 1 0 O*M�M�M-M SITE PLAN SCALE: I"= 20'-0" $$J VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Develo ment Department M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 15, 1999 RE: ZBA 29-99 CONDITIONAL USE FOR CONVERSION OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO CHURCH 901 W. GOLF ROAD REVERAND HYUNG SAHN (APPLICANT) Attached find a revised site plan and floor plans for the proposed Hyung Jae Methodist Church at 901 W. Golf Road. In response to concerns raised at the Village Board Meeting of October 5, 1999, the applicant has increased the proposed %..0 parking to 29 spaces. The applicant had previously proposed 11 spaces and the Zoning Code minimum requirement for the Church is 14 spaces. 6, H:\GEN\PLNG\ZBAqBA 1999\MEJ Memos\ZBA-29-99 Memo (Hyung Jae) mej memo.doc I ME It NORTH vauP .SITE P'L,A,N my us � b w VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE CT Conununity Develo ment vepartment or P lut .4 t M E M 0 R A N D U M TO MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM- DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ICS " D, TIE OCTOBER 1, 19991 RE: ZBA 29-99 CONDITIONAL USE FOR CONVERSION OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE TO CHURCH 901 W. GOLF ROAD REVERAND HYUNG SA14N (APPLICANT) The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use topermit the conversion of a single-family residence to a church. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their September 23, 1999 meeting. The subject property is an existing home located at 901 W. Golf Road. The applicant plans to convert the house for useas, a, church and to construct a parking lot. The proposed church would seat 40 and would be occupied Sunday mornings and W'ed,nes dAy evenings. Several area residents,, spoke, ag "nst the proposed, church, at the ZBAmeeting. The residents concerns "we're prim arny related tot is mid, congestion, possible loss of privacy due to the church, light intrusion froraveh,"icles and parking lot lightingat the church,, and ,thcoir opinion that, a church is, not cornpat"ble with ad 4 t jacent residential properties, The residents also presented a petition opposing the church. One resident, spoke in favor of the church. The ning omeyrs iscussIt dshe merof the, residents' objectios to theproposal. Ile Zoning Board,ZoBard mbded tiit stafrs, analyslisthat the prpposal would create Ii ' ttle or noaddit,"I"onal traffic,and that any nefitc, ,W traf would use, Golf Road,, rather than, local, street's. T -he Z,,B,A reviewed landscaping and lighting requirements for parking lots and, stated thetr optnion that those requ,ire ments, would prevent light intrusion onto adjacentpro, perttess., The ZBA also stated their opinion that thepotential for, nuisances -and loss of privacy to neighbors was probably greater from a having another family next door than from this small church. Finally, the ZBA members discussed the location, of existing c hurrhes in 'the Village and stated that nearly all of them were, located in residential, 0 nei ghborhoods without havinga, detrimenta I effect on those neighbo; 'rhoods. Following that, disoussion, the Zoning Boara of Appeals members voted, 4-0, to recommend approval of a request, for Conditional Use approval for the conversion of an exist'ing single-fam , ti , y residence to, a church at 901 W. Golf ',Road with,, the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by John Y. Kim & Assoc., Inc., dated July 12, 1999 (Attachment 1). 2. Maintain the existing residential character of the building elevations. 3. Addition of 5 parking spaces to the site, for a total of 14, exclusive of the garage. 4. Submis,sion of a final landscape plan, Meeting all requirements of Zoning Code, Article 23. 5. Submittai and approval, of" final Engiheeriing 'Plans meeting all Development Code requirements and/or approval, by the, Plan Com mission of any necessary Development Code Exceptions. 6. Submittal of final building plans meetin gall, applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 7. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. . ........... Willianif, Iney Jr., AICP 8P H:\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 19991MEJ Memos\ZBA-29-99 Memo (Hyung Jac) mej memo.doc VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Communitv Develo ment De p •P• M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEIK, CHAIRPERSON LFROM: JEFFPER1GNS9'PL,ANNE' DATE: SEPTEM13ER 17, 1999 [--Y&ARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1999 SUBJECT: ZBA-29-99/COND NAL USE FOR THE ESTABLISHMIZNT OF A CHURCH IN AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE F11-4ACKGROUND INFORMATWIV, Petitioner: Hyung Jae Methodist Church 513 5 W.Diversey Chicago, IL 60639 Property Address,, 901 W. Golf Road Status of Petitioner: Contract Purchaser of the Property Parcel Numbers: 08-14-202-019 08-14-202-020 Lot Size: 1.12 acres Exisfing Zoning: R-1 Single Family Residence Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence Lot Coverage: 19% proposed 75% maximum per R-1 district (non-residential land use) Requested Action: Conditional Use to allow conversion of an existing single-family residence to a church. BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE cjo�Amjx The Petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to allow the conversion of the existing single-family residence 'to a church. As illustrated, on, the attached, si"te plan, the, church, would, be set back 62 feet from, Golf''Road, 11.5 fieet from the east (side) property fine,,, an( J over 100 feet from the rear and west property lines. The parking lot would be set back 30 feet from Golf Road and at least 65 feet from adjacent properties. Mount Pros pect,&n"in"g Board of Appeals M eenng o ' # f' September 23, 1999 ZBA-29-99 Page 2 To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed thepetitioner's plat of survey, Plot Plan, and elevations and visited the site. ANALYSIS Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: R-1 Single-family Residence / S,*In,gl�,e-fam"ii,y'Residences North; I I I Southoo R- I Sits, 1, gle-family, Residence, / Single-tamilly Residences E astwo R- I Single-fAmily, Residence / Single- fam IRy Residences Westif-I RW I Single Family Resi"I'dence / Farm stand Approval Process The subject site is in the R- I Single-fArlly Residence zoning district. "Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of worship" are I # isted as Permitted Uses in the R- I district except when a resident tal unit is converted to a church or, when the site is less than 40,000 square feet. Conditional Use approval is required when either of those conditions, ap ly to a proposed church. As both of 'those conditions apply, to the subjiect property,,, the proposed _P I chu'rch wi"ll, require a Condittional, Use approval by the Village 'Board, following a public hearing and recom.mendaxion by the Zonihig, Board of Appeals. As the Church would be, a, Conditional Use, future expansions of the Church on the existing site would require approval of a new Conditional'Use. Structure and Elevations The proposed use wou,ld occupy the existing structure and no significant alterations to the elevations are proposed. 4, 'Ibus, the existing residential, characterof the structure will be maintained. Parking Section, 14,22 ,24 lists, a parking, requirement for Churches of one space per 3 worshipers. As proposed, the church would 4, It seat forty worsh1perso, for atot-al requirement of 14 Parking spaces. The proposal includes a nines ace parking lot and two additional spaces M an, existhig garage, for a. total of 1.1 s paws., The two garage spaces Wl"ll, 'not, 'be available to, worshippers and therefore should not be cowited toward required, park"ing. Thus,,, die sits as, proposed, does not meet 1"its, went for parking spaces. 1n, the event that" diedhurch ts, approv, five additional spaces, must be added, to the site to meet zoning requirements. ed,, Landscape Plan The applicant lias not submitted landscape plans with the Conditional Use application. Landscape Plans meeting all requirements of Zoning, Code Article 23 will, 'be required, with the build, M, .in perm, t subinission.1 At a miniMUM, Article 23 will req�ure, 5% of the, total, pavement area, devoted to interior planting areas, a screen buffer a minimum of 6" *in, e* 1 ,h ight w th, sliade, trees at, 501 spacing around the parking lotperimeter adjacent to residential areas, a 10 W, contintiolus screen/buff-er a nit I ri , unum of 3' "in lei ht between the Parking area an,d Gotf'Road,, and fou to plantings. The proposed, fence w1ill hel� to meet some, of the parking lot screenitig requtrernents, but additional landscape materials will be requl"red. Traffic Generation and Safety The proposed church is located on Golf Road. Most of the vehicles arriving at or departing the site will use Golf nd the existing Road rather than travelling local streets. Using figures in the ITE Traffic Generation Manual, 2 ed., Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of September 23, 1999 ZBA-29-99 Page 3 single-family residence generates approximately 10 vehicle trips per day, or 70 per week. The manual does not include estimate of traffic generation for Churches. used full attendance for the proposed 40 seats, if the church members visited the site an average of three times per week with two people per car, the church would generate about 60(veh'icle trips per k, under this, scenario. Thus,, the proposal, would, generate less traffic than, the existing -p, (, mngWkda house. Also,, the churcli w*Il generate trips priiinar"lly at, off eaktimes Sundayori sad eey evenings), Based on these facts, the proposal would,, not have, a tri ental effect on traffic or safety. Comprehensive Plan Designation The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the property for single family residential uses. As the Zoning code establishes Churches as appropriate uses in residential districts, the proposed church is an appropriate use within this designation. Review by other Village Departments The proposal has been reviewed by the Village Fire Department, Engineering Division, and Building Division, which have the following comments regarding the proposal. The Engineering Division has reviewed the preliminary plans and stated that; at a minimum, stortnwater detention must be provided for the new parking lot, and that IDOT and MWRD permits will be required. The proposed conversion will also require compliance with the Development Code for the entire site. The Fire Department has reviewed the proposal and stated that the change of use will require that the building must be sprinklered throughout. The Fire Code will also require that a fire alarm system, fire extinguishers, and emergency lighting be installed prior of occupancy of the structure as a church. I IR Qi IN iW Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section 00" Aft contains seven specific findings that must be made 'in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: t3 The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and • Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The applicant proposes to establish a Church on a residential parcel along a major arterial roadway. The proposed Church will be similar to a single-family residence in terms of traffic generation and lot coverage and residential character of the structure will be maintained. Thus the proposed Church will be similar in intensity to the current use and would have little or no negative impacts on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements (when an additional 5 parking spaces and required landscaping are added). The neighborhood is developed as a single-family residential area. The small size of the church ensures that it will have little potential for injuring the use, enjoyment, or value of the neighborhood or impeding its orderly development. Mount Prospect Zonling Board of Appeals Meeting of Septmber 23, 1,999 ZBA-29-99 Page gill LqliwL;10,;Wt Me, I IIII I 1 11 1111 q 1111fl �11 Nyq1I qqi M�� t"UMUILL" I � � I mu The • Board's decision is final for this case. Wilii am J. /JP I! hflii]. II8\GJEWLNGQBA\ZBA 1999\Staff Mcmos\ZBA-29-99 Memo (Hyung «, 11 11, . .......... ,NMI M' TrIl V - r- ti A IN ml IIIII'MIN will Milo win WIN a I'malm milli 0,10, ww 7 qw% "WIt 4=01ka Avenue +► 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO, ZBA-29-99 Hearing Date: September 23, 1999 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 901 W. Golf Road PETITIONER: Hyung Jac Methodist Church 5135 W. Diversey Chicago, IL 60639 PUBLICATION DATE: September 8, 1999 91AILAY LD 40 REQUEST. Conditional Use to allow conversion of an existing single-family residence to a church M[EM[BERS PRESENT, Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Leo Floros Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem STAFF MIM [BE PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Jeffery Perkins, Planner I Wi 0 01114, 1 Ronald & Joann Schlacter Larry B i'an 6alana James & Clio Athany Mike Collins Bob Klein Bn"an & Maria Kujawa Adolph & Earnestie Sitkiewiez Drury & Lynn Mays Mila. Joshi Tony Kim Sam Lee Dong Shin Jodie Kim Chairperson Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 22, 1999 meeting, seconded by Leo Flores and approved unanimously. Approval of minutes of the August 26 meeting was postponed to the October 28 meeting. Chairperson Juracek announced the postponement of Case No. ZBA-26-99 to the October 28, 1999 meeting and the Board heard Case No. ZBA-28-99. Ms. Juracek then introduced Case No. ZBA-29-99, a request for a Conditional Use to allow conversion of an existing single-family residence to a church. She also informed the ZBA that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Ms. Juracek opened the public hearing and inquired if notice of the case had been given. Mr. Jeff Perkins, Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the item and reported that public notice for this IN i case had been given n the form of a newspaper legal ad, a sign posted on the property, and notices mailed to property owners within 250' of the subject property. He then presented a petition to the ZBA signed by 153 residents opposed to the proposed church. esi MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS IBA CASE NO* ZBA-29-99 Hearing Date: September 23, 1999 PROPERTY ADDRESS. 901 W. Golf Road PETITIONER: Hyung Jae Methodist Church 5135 W. Diversey Chicago, IL 60639 PUBLICATION DATE :September 8, 1999 DAILY HERALD REQUEST: Conditional Use to allow conversion of an existing single-family residence to a church MIEM13ERS PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Leo Floros Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxern Pu STAFF MIEMOBERS PRESENT: Michael Bluo,,, AICP De ty Director of Community Development JeMry'Perkin, s, Planner Ronald & Joann Schlatter Larry Biancalana James & Clio Athany Mike Collins Bob Klein Brian & Maria Kujawa Adolph & Earnestine Sitkiewicz Drury & Lynn Mays Mila. Joshi Tony Kim Sam Lee Dong Shin Jodie Kim Chairperson Juracek called the meeting to order at 734 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 22, 1999 meeting, seconded by Leo Floros and approved unanimously. Approval of minutes of the August 26 meeting was postponed to the October 28 meeting. Chairperson Juracek announced the postponement of Case No. ZBA-26-99 to the October 28, 1999 meeting and the Board heard Case No. ZBA-28-99. Ms. Juracek then introduced Case No. 'SBA -29-99, a request for a Conditional Use to allow conversion of an existing single-family residence to a church. She also informed the ZBA that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Ms. Juracek opened the public hearing and inquired if notice of the case had been given. Mr. Jeff Perkins, Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the item and reported that public notice for this case had been given in the form of a newspaper legal ad, a sign posted on the property, and notices mai-led to property owners within 250' of the subject property, zon'IngBoard of Appeals Arlene, Juracekt Chairperson ZBA-29-99 Page 2 04, oil I NOR A 4F if IIL IPA Nam W, "18 I Ema I I I AIML�111' III IMF AM I'K!1JLWj 1, EL" I 1111� 111111immim MS* Juracek asked,' if Board, nlembers, had questions for staff, , Mr. Rogers questi"Oned the location of the sign. Mr. 1 '4' 'd d1at, would be dealt with,, when, thepetitioner presented a stgn, appticati'on. Perkins sal Ms. Juracek asked if the petitioner wished to address the Board. M's,. Juracek asked what activities would be held at the church, and whether they disturb the privacy of 'the neighborhood. Zoning Board of Appeals 1BA-29--99 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3 Mr. Kim said the neighbors would not know that the church is there. They will not have church bells or any noise. Their services will be held 10:00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m. on Sundays and 8:00 p.m. — 9:30 on Wednesdays. All activities will be within the building. They have 29 members, 7 families. There will be less than 25 people at services on a Sunday. Mr.Kim said he does not anticipate any large growth in membership m the immediate future. He said they curr#� ently rent a small 7 Day Adventi Ih est church in Northbrook, but have the opportunity to, purchasethis property to have their own church. The church they now worship in is in a residential neighborhood. He stated their members reside in the Mount Prospect, DesPlaines and Northbrook area. He said that the minister would maintain an office at his home in Des Plaines, and that no office functions would be carried out at this site. Mr. Kim stated they plan to do much more landscaping than is required by the Village. He said their members include a general contractor, a mechanic and an electrical contractor and they hope to be an integral part of Mount Prospect, Ms. Juracek asked if any members of the audience wished to speak. Gerry Zerbek, 907 S. See Gwun was sworn in. Mr. Zerbek said he had questions for the people who oppose this request, the people on the south side of Golf Road, who Mr. Zerbek said had a meeting several days ago regarding this matter. Mr. Zerbek was initially unwilling to address the Chair, but Ms. Juracek quickly explained the meeting would need to be handled in an orderly fashion. He should state his questions, and they would be addressed by other members of the audience when they came forward to be sworn in. Mr. Zerbek said he wanted to know where a certain gentleman resided in conjunction with the proposed site. He asked how neighbors to the church could be personally inconvenienced on a Sunday morning when they would be in their own church or sleeping at that time. Mr. Zerbek described the churches in the immediate area. He stated that the implied traffic congestion was a moot point, given the preponderance of churches in the area. Mr. Zerbek said the assertion of diminished property values was "bizarre," He stated these reasons were just a "smoke screen" to hide the real objection of a Korean church in their neighborhood. Adolph git iewicz, 1003 S. Na Wa Ta Avenue; Ronald Schlacter, 1002 S. Na Wa Ta; Mike Collins, 1103 Ash Drive; Mila Josie, 1004 S. Na Wa Ta Avenue; Maria Kujawa, 906 W. Palm Drive; Conine Cardone, 914 Park Drive (currently staying at her mothers. house at 902 Palm Drive, directly behind proposed church); each came up individually and were sworn in to void their concerns. Those concerns were related toUhninished property values, violation of their privacy, inappropriate mix of land uses, traffic and parking congestion, not the highest and best use of land, unpleasant conditions for their visitors, intrusion of lights and noise, change in nature of the neighborhood, concerns for potential danger to their children, too much activity in the area, the, paved parking lot causing a decrease in grassy area and affecting appearance of area, growth of the church with no room for expansion. These residents also said they resented Mr. Zerbek's implication that their opposition to the project was based on prejudice, as there are all nationalities living amicably in the neighborhood. Ms. Kujawa pointed out that she had purchased her home from a Korean person. Mr. Zerbek requested permission to address the group again and reminded residents that every church in Mount 0 Prospect is surrounded by residential use. He also said there would be no devaluation of their r property, and if they were to call a real estate agent, they would see that all homes in the area are valued at over $250,000.. Ms. Juracek thanked him for his comments. Ms. Juracek raised residents' comments about their preference for upscale homes on this property rather than a church and asked staff if any developer had "Indicated an interest in building on those lots. Mr. Perkins said staff had not been approached by any builder with that intention. Ms. Juracek then asked petitioner if he wanted to address the group again. Mr. Kim called attention to the landscape plan provided to the IBA and said they were willing to do more landscaping than Code required. He said they would be putting up the fence and there would be no problem with lights or noise for the area and asked the neighborsto reconsider and give them a chance. H:%GEWLNOKWA\Z8A 1999Winutes%ZBA-29-" 901 w awn u&c Zoning Board of Appeals Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ZBA-29-99 Page 4 ' iairperson Juracek'closed the public hearing at 830, read the four standards for allowing a Conditional Use, and ct asked Board members for discussion on the case. Keith Youngquist asked about discrepancies between the zoning map and the site plan on this property and asked if the site was two lots or one consolidated lot. Mr. Perkins responded that the survey showed,, flie property as one parcel. Although there are, two tax I.D. numbers the property was notbeen formally subdivided. Thorefore, the Village •considers the,P to'perty as one zoning lot. , P ftion t, e, request that aIIj Mount Prospect ch,urches are Mr. Floros stated he wanted to point out totliose in op ost 1, oth historically in residential districts and thiswas, ac",pted Ua, way of life in this and rn stated that Golf load had many churches, sett"ing ost other towns,, Heals:10 a., Sip,t�fi,,cant,,,eceden,t. He� sahehad, no problem a' #I pproven g the, request, which was not only appropriato'but,also' desirable., Rogors said he also had no problem supporting this req'uest. He reminded those in opposition that, with the 3' grade difference, the 6' fence being erected around the church hland o , ise. rty m propewould afford thema 0' barrier against eadights, n d Mjs'I Juracek, state the proposed la,ndscapin,g arounud the parkin1g, lot 'should M Inimize neighbors, concerns about ghts, and '*improve,, the appearance of the existing property, Th"g w"ll provide an a ate te buffer one to ffie resident" I i ta property" whereas one or two homes on, the property woull' IU ide a, loss off-buffbr,zone, a,na privacy. d pro1v I She said,th,"I'S,,Cond,li'tto�naI se w uldkelolp the property in, 1,,at;,ive.,Iy I W, I I a re quiet, mode, and, sho'had, no, problem approving isreque th sty , M s'. Juracek said sheappreel"atedthe time and # effirt put, forth bythe neighbors, but saidthe Z'.BA, must took, at"'theoverall impact. Mr. Youngquist said he was in favor of the request because of all the reasons cited by the other Board members. Richard, Rogersmade a.,moti',on to ap,'Provethe request,,, subjec�t to the cond'a , i I ons recommended by staff relative to the parking tot extension, sign, location. and,slize to be approved by staff, to within Code, and a minimum of six foot fenth landscaping, beinstAlit Youngquist seconded the motion, Ms. Jumeek'asked for a vote on the notion. ion* UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Rogers, Juracek, Youngqul*st NAYS: None Motion was approved 4.0. M.S. Juracek stated the Village Board's decision would be final for the Conditional Use t and that theftem, would be scheduted, for the Village Board meeting," of October 5, 1999. Richard Rogers then made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Keith Youngquist- The motion was approved by voice Youngquist-vote. Meeting was adjourned at 8:44 p.m. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secret'ary ... ............................... VWL 10/13/99 10/15/99 ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY O. O' WEU'QQLE R,QAQ, WHEREAS, Reverend Hyung Sahn/Hyung Jae Methodist Church (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Conditional Use with respect to property located at 901 West Golf Road, (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property) and legally described as follows: That part of the Northeast '/ of Section 14, Township 41 N, Range 11 E of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the South line of Golf Road with a line which is 352.73 feet East of and parallel with that line which is parallel and 38.08 chains and 9 feet East of the West line of said Section 14, and running thence South 200 feet; thence East along a line which is 200 feet south of and parallel with the South line of Golf Road 170.0 feet; thence North parallel with said West 199.33 feet to the center line of Old Seeger Road; thence Westerly on said center line 6.55 feet to its point of intersection with the South line of Said Golf Road; thence West in said South line of Golf Road 163 feet to the place of beginning in Cook County, Illinois. WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Conditional Use to convert an existing residential structure to a church, and to construct a parking lot; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Conditional Use being the subject of ZBA Case No. 29-99 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 23r' day of September, 1999, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount erg'givagt- Joumal & IOD on the 8t' day of September, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 29-99; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Conditional Use would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: 5EQIT IQ, The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. In The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Conditional Use, as provided in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Code, to allow the conversion of residence to a church, and Section 14.2224 of the Village Code, to allow the construction of an accessory parking lot, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A," &I' S 11 e"MORIBREE That prior to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Conditional Use, the following conditions and/or written documentation shall be fulfilled: 1 Development of the site in general conformance with the Site Plan prepared by John Y. Kim and Associates, Inc., attached as Exhibit "A." 2. Maintain the existing residential character of the building elevations. 3. Submission of a final landscape plan meeting all requirements of Zoning Code Article 23. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements and/or approval by the Plan Commission of any necessary Development Code exceptions. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by the Illinois Department of Transportation (I DOT) and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD). That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. IT" rakl.�� PASSED and APPROVED this I day of % 1991 Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H -\GEN\fi1es\W1 N\O RDI NAN C\C. US E.29-99-90 i W. Gol Rd.church. doc ORDINANCE NO. I AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLAT OF VACATION FOR A PUBLIC ALLEY LOCATED IN LOT 1 OF ' THE PROSPECT PLACE PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION The Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the alley described on Exhibit A attached to this Ordinance is no longer useful to the Village and that it is in the best interests of the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect that the alley be vacated and returned to the tax rolls. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, as follows: The alley, as described on the Plat of Vacation, attached as Exhibit A is hereby vacated. 2. The President and Village Clerk are authorized to execute and cause the recordation of Exhibit A.. PASSED AND APPROVED this i day of ATTEST: Velma Lowe Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor 11 Exhibit A PROSPECT PLACE PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION CENTRAL ROAD INERMFORE fJFMtATrnh BUSSL AS I. NM MLI(I IN load Nkolad1lIml Public alley to be vacated 0F:ZD1 NANCE NO, AN ORDINANCIE AF=PROVING A PLAT OF VACATION FOR A PUBLIC ALLEY LOCATED IN LOT 1 OF THE PROSPECT P LACE PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION '1The P 4, Corporate Authorities of 'the, V* I I'age OfWount rospect have determine that the alley described on Exhibit A attalcheci, to this Ord& e, inance is no Iongfer us fUlto the Viliage and that it is in the best interests of tM residents ofthe Village, of Mount Prospect that the alley be vacated and returned to the tax rolls. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the President and Board •of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County., Illinois, as follows: The alley, as described on the Plat of Vacation, attached as Exhibit -A is hereby vacated. 2. The President and Village Clerk are authorized to execute and cause the recordation of Exhibit A.. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 11999. ATTEST: Velma Lowe Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor 0 -7- pLJ�ICS PLA T OF AoP% F?4E'l%�VBDII/ObION CENTR^L- CAD C�A QU) 1p" TD0, m 1, o" LIM &ON C71 Malum, IW '22 1 11 14 . 0." Wi1c.. 04 1 -777 131151E AVI NoL Hills! 10�111rj 1prJ111111ri, Pubfic alley to be vacated VILLAGE OF MOUNTPROSPECT Community Development Department M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: MICHAEL JAN ONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: OCTOBER 291, 1999 SUBJECT: ZBA-31-99, REZONING AND VARIATIONS FOR A ELECTRICAL SUPPLY STO 600 E. RAND ROAD THOMAS REINDL (PROPERTY OWNER) The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Rezoning and Variations to permit construction of an electrical supply store. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their October 28, 1999 meeting. The applicant received approval for a 47,950 square foot electrical supply store on four parcels totaling 2.02 acres earlier this year. A single family residence and landscape business on the subject property have since been demolished. The applicant recently purchased 10 feet of additional property on the north boundary of the previously approved site, bringing the site area to 2.11 acres. The 10 feet of additional property is zoned RI Single-family Residential and CR Conservation Recreation. The applicant proposes to use the additional 10 feet to increase the size of the structure to 50,956 square feet to house a retail and wholesale electrical supply facility, with associated office and warehouse spaces. The site would also contain 79 parking spaces, four loading docks, and landscape improvements. The development requires Variations to allow a driveway to encroach into the required side (north) setback up to the property line and to increase the maximum permitted lot coverage from 75% to 81.1 %. Mr. Thomas Reindl, applicant spoke briefly in favor of the proposal. Mr, Reindl described arrangements that he had made with the Mt. Prospect Park District. He stated that he initially tried to purchase 16' of additional property to allow for a landscape buffer, but the Park District was hesitant to give up so much land. The Park District finally agreed to transfer the 10' to Mr. Reindl, who agreed to contribute $16,000 to the Park District for landscaping in that area. Mr. Reindl has also provided for a future access to the Park District Property via his north driveway. No other people spoke during the public hearing. The Zoning Board of Appeals briefly discussed the proposal and the Zoning Code Rezoning and Variation standards. The ZBA then voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the requested Rezoning from RI and CR to B3 and Variations to allow a driveway to encroach into the required side (north) setback up to the property line and to increase the maximum permitted lot coverage from 75% to 81.1% for the proposed retail and wholesale electrical supply facility 600 N. Rand Road. VA Willi' J. Cooney Jr., AICP \1VH1V02\DEPI[COMDEV\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 19991MEJ Memos\ZBA-31-99 Memo (Northwest2) mej memo.doc OEM *,LNNI - WAA imp -a", 4*E400 m u Nnm n �N m n Y a " 1A-"" � � , 00 01— _ � �w �IWW 1 wn- " " mI1Yr }� � W� n �x,u;�w ���mwm X 4 �► i '� tr �' G' r .., � �y1i � `"rye p�W�. r, ��Mr� p�' A MV/ �W' "I���'"�"" ,�u -416 m lul Vol � W%'wars „ a 4 w Abdo ow, 74 r m ✓0, .10, 00000 .100, y w�^m" � lop) ft (1 r 1p .i My w ll� rw ed 64 , ° N,,, IF dr, I "r . � r r 1000, / b%.. r .yw w o a �� �.. ' a r L 1"A I Ile _ VILLAGE OFMOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department Witt'sAm I � � M E M 0 R A N D U Mo JH ........ ..... . . . ......... TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1999 SUBJECT: ZBA-31-999 REZONING AND VARIATIONS TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A WHOLESALE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY STORE Petitioner: Thomas Reindl Northwest Property, L.L.C. 30 S. Main Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Status of Petitioner: Part owner of the property Property Owner: Northwest Property, L.L.C. 30 S. Main Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Location: 600 E. Rand Road Lot Size: 2.11 Acres Existing Zoning: RI Single ramily Residence, CR Conservation Recreation, and B3 Community Shopping Existing Land Use: Vacant land. Requested Action: Petitioner is seeking a Rezoning from RI Single Family Residence and CR Conservation Recreation to B3 Community Shopping and Variations to side yard (interior) setback and lot coverage requirements to permit establishment of an electrical supply store. Proposal The applicant received approval for a 47,950 square foot electrical supply store on four parcels totaling 2.02 acres earlier this year. A single family residence and landscape business on the subject property have since been demolished. The applicant has also purchased 10 feet of additional property on the north boundary of the previously approved site, bringing the total site area to 2.11 acres. The applicant has applied for a plat of consolidation to combine the various parcels into a single lot. The 10' of additional property is currently zoned RI Single-family Residential and CR Conservation Recreation. ZBA 31-99 Northwest Electric — Rezoning and Variations Meeting of October 28, 1999 Page 2 The applicant proposes to use the additional 10' to increase the size of the structure to 50,956 square feet to house a retail and wholesale electrical supply facility, with associated office and warehouse spaces. The site would also contain 79 parking spaces, four loading docks, and landscape improvements. Review and Approval Process The majority of the property was rezoned to 133 Community Shopping in May, 1999. The property to be added to the site is currently zoned RI Single-family Rcsidcnce and CR Conservation Recreation (see attached location map). To accommodate the proposed use, the RI and CR portions of the property must be rezoned to B3 Community Shopping. The applicant has requested a Map Amendment for that portion of the property. The petitioner is also seeking Variations to allow the north driveway to encroach into the required interior side yard and an increase to the maximum ' permitted lot coverage. The proposed north driveway encroaches to within 2' of the property line (10' required) and the proposed lot coverage is 81.1% (75% maximum permitted). To conduct its analysis of the proposed Map Amendment and Variations, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject parcels for general commercial and office uses. The proposed B3 zoning district is appropriate within this designation. The B3 district lists home improvement centers and retail sales of lamps and lighting fixtures as permitted uses. The proposed facility is an appropriate use in the B3 district. Site Plan The proposed development includes a 31,266 square foot building footprint with 9,760 square feet of mezzanine and 9,920 square feet of basement area, for a total of 50,946 square feet of building area. The proposed site and structure meet all zoning code requirements, except as noted above. Elevations No changes to the previously approved elevations are included with this proposal. Parking Calculations The proposed facility contains 50,946 square feet of use area. Of that area 38,146 square feet is devoted to warehouse area and the remaining 12,800 is devoted to office and retail area. Based on those areas, the building would require 77 parking spaces, (26 for the warehouse function and 51 for the retail and office functions) while 77 spaces are provided. The four required handicap accessible spaces are provided. Variations The development as proposed would require two Variations — for the required 10'parking setback to the north property line and for overall lot coverage. The applicant cites the shape of the lot, it's topography, required easements, and locational requirements for the Rand Road entrance to the property as justifications for the proposed Variations. This justification is spelled out in the attached application. In general it notes that the subject parcel is of an unusual shape and has a significant slope. The combination of the shape and ZBA 31-99 Northwest Electric — Rezoning and Variations Meeting of October 28, 1999 Page 3 slope make development of the site according to all zoning code requirements nearly impossible while providing for sufficient access for emergency and delivery vehicles, necessary easements, and IDOT requirements for driveway location. Rezoning Standards The standards for Map Amendments are listed in Section 14.203.D.8.a of the Village Zoning Ordinance. When a Map Amendment is proposed, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in each specific case with respect to, but not limited to, the following matters: ❑ compatibility with existing uses and zoning classifications of property within the general area of the property in question; ❑ the compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification; ❑ the suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing and proposed zoning classifications; ❑ consistency with the trend of development in the general area of the property in question, and the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the village The subject property is located along a principal arterial road in close proximity to large existing commercial and industrial areas. The proposed B3 zoning district and the proposed use of the site will be compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning districts. The parcel is suitable for the proposed use and the proposed home improvement center will be complementary to similar uses located in the vicinity (Home Depot, Menard's, Century Tile, Light Brothers, etc.). The subject property is buffered from residential areas to the north by the Hill Street Nature Preserve. The portion of the proposed development nearest the Nature Preserve will contain a small landscape area and an employee parking area. Thus, the proposal should have little impact on the adjacent Park. The proposed zoning district and use of the property are consistent with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, and Rand Road Corridor Plan. Variation Standards Required findings for all variations are contained in Section 14.2030.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. These standards relate to: ❑ A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; ❑ lack of desire to increase financial gain; and ❑ protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The subject parcel is an odd -shaped, sloping property, which constrains it potential development. Thus a positive finding can be made regarding a hardship due to the unique characteristics of the site. The proposed variations are related to the particular type of building needed by the applicant and access and utility requirements, rather than a desire to maximize total square footage. Thus a positive finding can be made regarding the purpose of the proposed variation. The site is located adjacent to a nature preserve, which is heavily wooded and the proposed variations affect the property line shared with the preserve. The nature preserve parcel will ensure that the proposed variation does not have an adverse impact on nearby properties or neighborhoods. The limited usage of the employee parking area will limit impact on the nature preserve itself. ZBA 31-99 Northwest Electric — Rezoning and Variations Meeting of October 28, 1999 Page 4 Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Map Amendments m Section 14.203.D.8.a and the standards for Variations in 14.203.C.9. Therefore, Staff recommends g,p,proval of the proposed Map Amendment and Variations. re A *10 William J. Cooney, Jr., AICP Director of Community Development H:\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 19991Staff Memos\ZBA-31-99 (Northwest).doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO, IBA -31-99 blearing Date: October 28, 1999 PETITIONER: Thomas Reindl, for Northwest Property, L.L.C. 30 S. Main Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 0 RALD PUBLICATION DATE* October 11, 1999 DAILY''HEA, REQUEST: Rezoning from RI Single-family Residence and CR Conservation Recreation to B3 Community Shopping, and Variations to side exterior yard setback requirements and maximum lot coverage requirements for the establishment of a lighting and electrical store 0" MEEM[BERS PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Leo Floros Richard Rogers MEAUERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Luxem Keith Youngquist 0 STAFF M[ENMERS PRESENT. Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Jeffery Perkins, Planner INTERESTED PARTIEES: Thomas Reindl, Northwest Property, L.L.C. The meeting was called to order at 7:36 p.m. and the Board heard two cases previous to this case. At 8:25 p.m., Chairperson Juracek introduced Case No. ?:BA -31-99, a request for Rezoning from R1 Single-family Residence and CR Conservation Recreation to B3 Community Shopping, and Variations to side exterior yard setback requirements and maxknum lot coverage requirements for the establishment of a lighting and electrical store. Ms. Juracek opened the public hearing and inquired if notice of the case had been given. Mr. Perkins stated that public notice for this case had been given in the form of a newspaper legal ad, sips posted at the property, and a mailing to property owners within 250' of the subject property. Mr. Perkins then introduced the staff memorandum for the item, Rezoning and two Variations to permit construction of an electrical supply store at the comer of Rand Road and Business Center Drive. Mr. Perkins stated that the Village Board approved a rezoning to B3 Community Shopping and Variations for a 47,950 square foot electrical supply store on four parcels totaling 2.02 acres in May 1999. He added that the single family residence and landscape business on the subject property have since been demolished. He then stated that the applicant has purchased 10 more feet of property on the north boundary of the site, bringing the total site area to 2.11 acres and proposes to increase the size of the structure to 50,956 square feet and that the site would contain 79 parking spaces, four loading docks, and landscaping. A plat of consolidation to combine the various parcels into a d single lot is scheduled for the Plan Commission on November 3 Mr. Perkins stated that the 10' of additional property is zoned RI Single-family Residential and CR Conservation Recreation and must be rezoned to B3 to accommodate the proposal and that the petitioner is seeking Variations to Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-31-99 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 reduce the interior side yard setback from 10 feet to 2 feet for the north driveway and to increase to the maximum permitted lot coverage from 75% to 81.1%. He added that the proposal meets all other zoning code requirements. r. ns escribed the app,1i'c4aJtt`s usti fications f6r the proposed Variations, wh ich 'we're -related to the shape of MPerkid,J the lot, Its topography, required eaLDO en seeirts', and T locational requirements for the ,and Road entrance to the property'. He stawd that the corn,b1tiation,, of those ;actors rnake development of the, site according to all zoning code requirements difficult while provid*lng for sufficient access for emergency and, delivery vehicles, necessary easernents, and req uirements for driveway location. Mr. Perkins discussed the subject property in terms of the Zoning Code Standard for Map Amendments. He stated that the property is located on a principal arterial road near large existing commercial and industrial areas and that the proposed 83 zoning and use of the site will be compatible with those surrounding land uses and zoning districts. He added that the parcel is suitable for the proposed use and the proposed home improvement center will be complementary to similar uses located in the vicinity. He further stated that the Hill Street Nature Preserve buffers the residential areas to the north from the subject property and that the portion of the proposed development nearest the Nature Preserve will contain a small landscape area and an employee parking area which will limit future impacts form the proposal on the adjacent Park. The proposed zoning district and use of the property are consistent with provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, and Rand Road Corridor Plan. Mr. Perkins then described the proposal in terms of the Zoning Code Standard for Variations. He stated that the subject property is odd -shaped and sloped, which constrains its potential development. He added that because of those facts, a positive finding can be made regarding a hardship due to the unique characteristics of the site. He then said that the proposed variations are related to the particular type of building needed by the applicant and access and utility requirements, rather than a desire to maximize total square footage so that a positive finding can be made regarding the purpose of the proposed variation. He then described the site's location adjacent to a nature preserve and that the proposed variations affect the property line shared with the preserve. He stated that the nature preserve parcel will ensure that the proposed variations do not have an adverse impact on nearby properties or neighborhoods and that the limited usage of the employee parking area will limit impacts from the variations on the nature preserve itself. used on its analysis of the proposal with respect to Zoning Code standards for Map Amendments and Variations, Mr. Perkins gave staff s recommendation that the TBA recommend to the Village Board approval of the proposal. Arlene Juracek questioned if the north wall of the building had moved any further north with this plan. Mr. Perkins responded that everything in the plan had shifted 101 north and the building would be 10' larger and explained the changes illustrated in the exhibit. Richard Rogers reminded the group that the trees on the north line were to serve as a buffer zone to the residential area to the north and asked what would happen to them 1 Tom Reindl, 904 Lakewood, Barrington, who is co-owner of Northwest Electric Supply and property owner of this parcel was sworn in and shared a brief history of Northwest Electric. He stated that the planned construction would damage the trees, none of which was a hardwood variety but just the type of trees that grow along fence lines. In dealing with the Park District for purchase of their land Northwest Electric made their proposed driveway available to the Park District for future access. At this time, all concerned realized a new buffer needed to be established. Northwest Electric wanted to purchase 16' of land and supply the buffer area but it was the Park Districts preference to sell only 10' of land and require a cash contribution of $16,000 for landscape material to re-establish a proper buffer. Northwest Electric acquiesced to this request. Mr. Reindl explained that their plan to allow the Park District use of their driveway would also reduce the total number of ingress/egress points needed from Rand Road, which is desirable for IDOT standards. Mr. Rogers said he considered that a great solution and commended Northwest Electric in this endeavor Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-31-99 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 3 Mr. Reindl pointed out there would be no parking against the north lot line, all parking would be against the building. Ms. Juracek asked what type of interior changes were being made from the original plans. Mr. Reindl said they had not realized they would require a separate entrance to a sprinkler room and the basement would require a separate exit to the outside. Mr. Floros asked what the proposed timetable was. Mr. Reindl said they hoped the building would be completed by Summer of 2000. Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing at 8:45 p.m. Leo Floros made a motion to approve the request for Rezoning from RI Single-family Residence and CR Conservation Recreation to B3 Community Shopping, and Variations to side exterior yard setback and maximum lot coverage requirements for the establishment of a lighting and electrical store. Richard Rogers seconded the motion-, UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros, Juracek, Rogers Motion was -approved 4-0. The ZBA heard one additional case. At 9:05 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn., seconded by Richard Rogers. Meeting was adjourned. Barbara Swiatek, lanning Secretary P S anner" H-.\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 19991Minutes,\ZBA-31-99 Northwest Electricldoc VW1/ 11/10/99 ORDINANCE NO,, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND GRANTING VARIATIONS TQ,,.,.PRQPERTY Q �,,AQNL . . ...... -KNOWN,A5 QQQ1 EA 5—T RAND ROAD WHEREAS, Thomas Reindl, (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner), has filed an application to rezone certain property generally located at 600 E. Rand Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Parcel 1: Lot A in Woodock's Subdivision of the South 242' except the North 100 feet thereof measured on the East line of the South 242 feet of that part of the SEI/4of the NE% of Section 34, T 42NO R 11 E of the Third Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the center line of Rand Road except the East 75 feet of the South 77 feet of the land fronting 125.77 feet on Easterly side of Rand Road in Cook County, Illinois, Parcel 2: The South 33 feet measured along the East line of that part of the SEI/4of the NEI/4of Section 34, T 42N, R 11 E of the Third Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the center line of Rand Road (except the East 75 feet thereof in Cook County, Illinois, Parcel 3: That part of the North 100 feet as measured along the East line of the South 242 feet of that part of the SEI/4of the NEI/4of Section 34, T 42N, R 11 E, lying easterly of the center line of Rand Road (except that portion used for road purposes), East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois, Together with: Outlots 11 and 12 in Kensington Center, Phase 1, being a subdivision in the E%2 of Section 34, T 42N, R 11 E of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois, and The south 10.0' of lots 1 and 2 in Alma H. Mueller Subdivision of a part of the SE1/4of the N E1/4of Sec. 34, T42N, R11 E of the Third Principal Meridian according to the plat thereof recorded May 5, 1989 as Doc. #89203563, in Cook County, Illinois. WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned from R-1 (Single Family Residence) and C-R (Conservation Recreation) Districts to B-3 (Community Shopping) District; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the requests for Rezoning and Variations being the subject of ZBA Case No. 31-99, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of October, 1999, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been Q published in the Mount PrQ i on t h e 11 1h day of October, 1999; and Qec:t L� a- , W' 0 ZBA 31-99 Page 2/2 WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have considered the requests being the subject of ZBA 31-99 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said requests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: EII° � 1-E--,, That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the'Vi'I'lage of Mount Prospect. That the Official Zoning Map of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance from R-1 and C-R to B-1 (Business Office) District. That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Secti'on.14.203.C.9 of the Village Code, toallow the d lint rive ay to encroach o the required side, yard setback up to the north property line as shown on the attached Site Plan, and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"; and CTJQN-E,D, URI', Thatthe President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as prov , i'ded in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Code, to increase the perrn 'Itted lot coverage, from 75% to 81.1 5,-E-Q-TJjaN!-fJV-,: E That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. - IQN SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. H M - NAYS: PASSED and APPROVED this, , day of 0, 1999. ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk H:\GEN\files\WIN\ORDINANC\Rezon&Varia (ion 600 E Rand.NW Elec.doc Gerald L. Farley, Village President V'I*,Il,age of Mount Prosrp pect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 1999 REQ PC -02-991 REINDL'S PLAT OF RESUBDIVISIONPLAT OF VACATION",AND EXCEPTION TO DEVELOPMENT CODE 600 E. RAND ROAD NORTHWEST ELECTRIC PROPERTIES, INC. The Plan Commission transmits their recommendation to approve the Reindl's plat of resubdivision, plat of vacation and an exception to the Development Code requirement for a twenty (20) foot utility easement along the rear property line. The plat of resubdivision consolidates the site into a one (1) lot subdivision. This consolidation is necessary to comply with Village code requirements that buildings not be constructed over property lines. The plat of vacation vacates an easement and was prepared to satisfy Cook County requirements. The applicant is also seeking an exception to Sec. 16.403.0.4 of the Development Code that requires a twenty (20) foot utility easement along the rear property line. The Engineering Division reviewed the request and found that no public utilities exist in that area and future development plans do not include public utilities in this area. Therefore, the proposed ten -foot easement is appropriate in this area. The Plan Commission met in regular session on November 3, 1999 and discussed the plats and exception to the Development Code. The Plan Commission reviewed the plat of subdivision and plat of vacation and found them complete and prepared in accordance with Development Code requirements. The Plan Commission voted 5-0 tit recommend approval of the Reindl's plat of resubdivision, plat of vacation, and exception to the Developmeni Code. William i Coonty, AICD Director of Community Development /b S \\VHW02\DEPn00MDEV\GEMPLNG\PCW 1999%MJ MemosTC-02-99 Reindis Rmb (NW Elea) doc lit 141 FOR I oil lie rfG wP t'j s, t j 1i 11ii; I 41 r . '0� ^4C w r w w w o 0 � (1C z Z t1C 0 k Q 4C no a C) y �1 HI z -j Z 1 z r 14 o r Z i '0� r w k r� r� y �1 HI 1 r 14 HM VWL AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION 0,QQ,E,A51 BAND BQAQ WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Thomas Reindl, has requested approval of a Final Plat of Resubdivision for the purpose of consolidating two lots at 600 East Rand Road into a single lot of record; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has recommended approval of the resubdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTIO N, ONE: That a consolidation of two lots into a single lot of record is hereby granted for the property at 600 East Rand Road and the Final Plat of Resubdivision attached to this Ordinance as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording. Such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into and made a part of this Ordinance. SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. I CTION.-THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES,, , An" 700M 4' knl PASSED and APPROVED this day of .1999. 0 ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe 11 Gerald L. Farley Village President ORDINANCE NO. J A A A WHEREAS, Petitioners have requested an exception from Section 16.403.C.4 of Chapter 16 (Development Code) of the Mount Prospect Village Code to reduce the required twenty foot (20') utility easement to ten feet (10') along the rear property line; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the request for an exception from Section 16.403 of Chapter 16 (Development Code) for the Subject Property at their regular meeting on November 3,1999, said request being the subject of PC -02-99 and by a unanimous vote recommended to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village to grant the exception from Chapter 16 as requested; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded their recommendation being the subject of PC -02-99 to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SE 0 1 A`That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. E-CITION 2.1, That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property an exception from Section 16.403.C.4 of Chapter 16 (Development Code) of the Mount Prospect Village Code to reduce the required twenty foot (20') easement along the rear property line to ten feet (10'), all as shown on the Plat of Vacation, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". r4 Page 2/2 Dev. Code, NW Electric 31. Except for the modification granted herein, all other requirements of said Development Code shall apply to the Subject Property. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES,, ABSENT, PASSED and APPROVED this day of � 1999. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk HM 11/11/99 ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A PLAT OF VACATION FOR A UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED IN LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE ALMA H. MUELLER SUBDIVISION A D I -NMikU�T'HORIZIN.1a.IH,E.,E-,X,EC.UTI,Q,,M�,,,,Q,E A, R 1"' 011i""VACATION 174 W-=* - The Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the utility easement described on Exhibit "A," attached to this Ordinance is no longer useful to the Village and that it is in the best interests of the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect that the utility easement be vacated and returned to the tax rolls. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, as follows: 1. The utility easement, as described on the Plat of Vacation, attached as Exhibit A be and it is hereby vacated. 2. The President and Village Clerk are authorized to execute and cause the recordation of Exhibit "A." U11 WM 16WIV&S ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this I day of $ 1999, ATTEST: Velma Lowe, Village Clerk C:kOFFICE\WPWIN\WPDOCS\MP\ORDS\Reindel,ord,wpd Gerald L. Farley, Village President M, m 411I * . 1. 144 1 1 1 " -4 " III " I oil 1 $ 11 t, I I I lk" It CIO A 14 1 t I IN11 --10 MT IS > M ;o M rn 0 r4 ;o rn =1 rn rn z > < 0 V) CD ILO > > Z PJ Pi z 5E 0 rm > M Z V > 0> z co r'n C (0 P,J rn Ln rn Old Ch > C) 0 0 x rr, z 0 0 0 "n �Q c -0 Z 0 > -0 ;o ;o --4 FO Z 7 Q -n 0 > z -0 r M >M > >4 4 C) 010 0 c ;o> rri :u c) 0 --4 7 Z 0 M V.01 n1age of MountProspect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS f.A Mr CA FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 1999 RE: PC -04-99 / RESUBDIVISION AND EXCEPTION 'To DEwEzLOPMENT CODE 301 S. I-OKA ST. RAYMOND DE PENAFORT PARISH The Plan Commission transmits their recommendation to approve the St. Raymond de Penafort Parish Subdivision and an exception to the Development Code requirement for a twenty (20) foot utility easement alonip the rear property line. The plat consolidates the site into a one (1) lot subdivision. This consolidation is necessary to comply with Village code requirements that buildings not be constructed over property lines. The applicant is also seeking an exception to Sec. 16.403-C.4 of the Development Code that requires a twenty (20) foot utility easement along the rear property line. In reviewing the request, the Engineering Division determined that although public utilities exist in that area, the entire lot is bounded by public right of way; therefore, no additional access for public utilities (i.e., no easement) is needed or required. The Plan Commission met in regular session on November 3, 1999 and discussed the plat and exception t+r _# - ode. The Plan Commission reviewed the plat of subdivision and found it complete and prepared in accordance with Development Code requirements. The Plan Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the St. Raymond de Penafort Parish Subdivision plat of resubdivision and exception to the Development Code. o Boone William J. �t . .00 - yv,.4AIC, Director of Community Development /bs kkVMV02WEP'nCOMDE'4" GENkPLMGPC 1999VAEU MeMOSW4A-99 St. Ray's,dac u 00 NW "MW! FINAL °° PIAT OF SUBDIVISION F......... OF n1 ST. RAYMOND de PENAFORT PALISH UBDIVISION C OF SCALE 1 30• I � 1 jjj,, Is EAST' fE JRt P �w AL r l N 1, Its THE ,LAE ' MW,UT R E I. � W �. LCAT 1. AREA = 154764 S.F. f 3.5529 ACMES . ............ — ----------- --- a� RYNCEUANEET ROY BERADO.SCOLf COLONIAL MANOR' STREET 196, M I LB U RNFq a d -m� 1JI WIN _ WALK �w 3 1r� ,. CRT 1 4 .' ?Il, LINE H. ROY BERRY AND =S C� to � mm ammmm„�mn�+m^ r�M"'"MSI 4 11 z �OCIK 4 PROSPECT PARK pi'Y' CLUB SUBDIMSION Coll a y 1 STORY OR � , � N AND S � U 5 18 c COURT YA' m w�� 17 ot It iw✓ r P „mm M - � 16 �.r in BRICK GARAGE �f � 0515.541) I w re W N 01 uMi� h a. +C 1_ M� tob 0. _. .. lol mm " Z � ., I a _ a.... w In e 14 m Vr Zi R. CL mm in o tl m m Y„ 1 A'. 2 ............... i . wmmmm ds - 1, 11 4 cm Ln 8 �, � �^�, mnmmmmmm � ur nn« xr ..�♦Y �....,�,..._____". � � ,,,...,:�� � .� M , A v BRI'OK AND STONE CHURCH " o 1A / u A u 1� 'TIC L .. p iJ vl �m14Mu AF iw I XS Puc Xc ., „ r 11-0-V FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION or ST. RAYMOND de PENAFORT PARISH SUBDIVISION OF PART ar *C SOUITCASt OUAAt[R OF " W)KYWAST OUAATIN Of S[CrOON 11, fovMSJ*p 41 *A(An4k WOO- N* (_AST Or YW 1114WO PfMOPAL WCRKWAN IN " %ALLAOI W WAMI "O"Cl. COOK COL)Hry. W"ONS P 1,N1; G8-11-219-001 08-11-219-018 08-11-219-002 08-11.219-009 08-11-219-003 08-11.219-010 08-11 -219-004 08-11-219-011 08-11-219-W7 OB -11^ 219-016 (.XXWn FS`C0dLDff9'5 C-lKTLFICATX STATE OF ILLINOIS I OWWANIN COUNTY Of COOK 1 8 m 1,, YKII 10 TO CIATITY TMlftl 00 MICAW, A CORPORATS 044',, It TXX (*",#, Or M 01*09M, 011IMM xsAlxW AND MY SAID MMIOCCV9 NXI CAVO ps 1A,1,0 plarlo"T'r TO aff owwwrov, Aw'' tumlyltm AS twsw NXIMON M, to V414 AM lf"P941`3 Twwo,"tim tlf M,TN", 9011; "Allsf 04c,109*11.414i iiiii Amrr iv i It vicis vvit 'tln* 1*01CATIO,,, ZATW ME Ud DAY OF 'k II TtTLX; SCIMOOL DISTItlCT CRATIFICATIt TMIl ISIn01"Ap'"WTV04 iffif iJIUAW, 4 CU**%MAJ,l ,SOL#, As , A� # WS, rSb,fAFTY ;gV;j4KZAji *SI, %AyHoM 4,% VKHAJ"I'll =11TIN t4mly'lltak" *jp ILWALLYZ"01"99D Dow US FjAT or KWX, KAI OrMwimm plYNS 6,11,11 Ol' ITS PONLUG4 1%t MoTlahlbr is vvici ils FORLOMthl;, WT' L4M !Ar4tRiWETLtCi SCHOOL DISTRICTS ELOMMAY WE PM, PROSPECT SCHOOL TOWNSHIP DISTRICT' 051 DISTRICT rrA.-t cr twoot c3 l=*XTY Cr COOK 6,, 9,, MOTAAV CUTIFICATIt A NOTMAS' MMICI IV AMD .%lTIrT -."T PE SOHALLY KNOW 10 MR To an AM Or Tku uaotocus or cmicAno. A, coftPoRATz so t, NOT VKRsovALLy wn 191 Twx mwt eN, �= 1"TUO r*ATfWLl, I I lusIcArsto VO Txg r"=j)4 tNI�;Tvvhjwr AVOW"00 siftwt He twj* MAIN to 111104f* im, woutu xcJw-w'w=k6 '11"T , 10 " , Wry Isrd4r) Aw vE%TVKvjM,rwg Utz) lvsiv� I CXT° OF WATIM AZT) PCA91013) TWf JSAL, 01, %tup AAt'utosts, 400" JM1c&w-T0 It, A,vf,FX =jgvxrw, AS TWOM "Il "UMOAT M7 AM AS 'M "Alt AJO WWWAX0 A,CTgf IIA,Ia t*rj%,T CC&*Aw. #0i To, otu AT "001%; winiv sir "'w", DAY Or --10�.-*4 GIVEN UNOCK HT NAM AND WMAtAL SIAL 'MIS _. p,,o. jqqq. 1 Of FICIAL l.;EAL CAROL ANN 1�4AAN KNIPAX.Mil I ISR4 I M$ is ft CUTIlry TRAT 1. TWIHNAg ", Exvm. AM ILLt"011 PocrisIctc"", L00 &L*VIYO* YM VIA limly"191) AM Sulotvion) Ina rOLLOW1HO DISC111SU) PROPERTY: Lan 31411 jum 1,44 11"- plot, *#kKI AM Col. f 1, M1,4wixt wjm" ww & IVEcIVII100 00' f0l'Or 'M NP PT OF SICT4*0 th, M 00S AgrEX of or To"4190, 4,1, 100*rm. NAW *0 PKIWIP", "XAMP40 f*vMvAtw;t,l0 rwt PLAT Or rAlc)4M'0OC*, 16%,111#6 Wi"Wills #. NAZI AN 0,100*04b i0i"I'm m1f,"A'A of"'rillutl Al bW'� tA40101 OW JV," AC 1*20 000 44" Inct, 11414'" 111LIA-04 Wi, LM 00; ul, on toswik,-'r iv A 11" 1 N 104=1 4 IN I ;, Or WT# I'S 14 PS OF 'TWZ "it' KALf of 'nM, 0Q#TWWT, Q%A*lYwA AM* 00'TWE SO MUST, ow"us, �o t"_," 1,1. r4"J#tV X11, '0#)jFTX, fAMA %'I, to bir-rVE T14100 k1tWIML kK*fOIA* MCCM40tJ 'M VNI ItAr 1XIMPOT 11410c"IM' W13% TNXMAt" EP 1^ ow''PAW-S AAS w". '03"Att"t i*;MT vc, 1041" IN CC" COOAM. IA411101,C, AM TWAT 11M MAT R211NOW DRAW 19 A CORANCT "PRSSIXTATI sAto svkvn Am sunnivitiom, otmamstoNs AAA sw" TM ri D c scim"PAxTi ?waxwr Am A" coRisciiii To T" trAwAxo I NJ1 Irk", "LILA u IT 12 ALSO tlrRTlrltD THAT NO PART Or THIS SV501YIIIOff 11 WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZA" AREA AS tDisTirtizi sy THE 3?4MlXCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY PIK FLOW INSURAJOCI %AT& MAI WITHIN TUN ColkPORATI LIMITS OF TW2 VILLAGE Or MOUNT' PROSPECT. WRICK W4 AbOTTIM6 A CITY PtM A010 10 &X9RCI6tW 7*1 tPKIA4 POVIU AVrWnJlXR EY O[VIS160 13 Ot ARTICLE I$ W? "S 114JWPOIS !RIM ICIfhto CLIFF AM THAT I 44UHAVE EST ALL 141001,V191M Am DISCIltuln THEM ON THIS rtK)LL PLAT AS NNOVISKI) OY THI PLAT ;fv" 1001-1k 'MY OAM) AM SUL 1114 DAY Or 49, 4116riMiil (41, 0,7 v PRVAMM FOR: XL CONSULTM CUL ENGINEERS LM. OFM NUMBIA 99042800,SU13 JULY 12. 19" "I . I- 0 �p, #* # 4 do 0.6 P**hm Me, - Now ft 610 0 P0 kg4 #A40144 Uft" a UUNVA wo " is m6w It owma &Y iKt �0=- A5wwW rwoff out ON dwadmad la be &"dybr AU pmoW "4mW purp",, ju M wm mod miff a oW Afvfoioa. 1, TU AAWAA b Ovft is 4d9w 111- Cott 0-ftq Amwww a ft.&r 0. "wft4ft w 0 64 ~41, /.ritual Is LA" A, Fw*w AMOK wra ow *w6a,0401 wmw* 0, off &TATI Or ILLINOIS I COLNM Or COOK 1 6 a Tarr imsTurn4xirr No TME RSCCWKDKIE'g OFrIC.T or COOK C"AM, ILLIP019, THIS DAY OF . ....... . .... . ...... - K, D L I I I AN O,CI4)CK -'m STATS or ILLINOIS I coutm or COOK I S'S, CooNTY CIMU xxx O 1, .wwnmuww =,AnT, 'clf VWX 06 c"'T Irl "tAT I T A, °Y Oo TV* rwovurv, O&Tu mis - my or 0 11991 PLAN CaMISS101% C%3(TtrIcJLTl STM Or ILLINOIS I COUWTJ OF COOK ) I'S Apnom My TRX rJAN cawtsgtog or THE VtLiAct or Homer PROS P9cT, Cox CMwTy, It ,mots, Twit MujU5 c^v or A14 tAt4c, 0"A'149MI v0~014, VILLAGs, MIlls ClImpich" Am 0"womw bw w.rw6 aw. MA40b"A ow ~ p"wo aw%im Is 06 0"l, aA MTZ Or ILLINOIS I COUKry OF COOK I II.S. WAO 06NA* and eawdwiftiowdow l aw w4d r.rd a PLPMOM Sy TIM VILLAGN MI"Im OF Two VILLACI OF "W" 0, 4%, Cowiewmrtakh Mm" Compol Ml- "I'll I ow '11, PRoSpKcT, Cwlc Lvown. IL LtHOI6 THIS DAY Or tEEwwlw T1 r/ rdqA- C -"v 04 ow*,*% **M4 wN, M ItcO #%ot, *-*MA* wMah, #"Iwo "WON ww" 4;w00*4,** for #0*0 *W,)J- 0* 00 OW " --4 %IZ !�, #%*M fm4pw , V:"i *4 4w vtu-wg COLLECIOA C'=TI?fCATv *WO "t 4ml%, #&Whim, ww*w STATZ OF ILLINOIS I COOK I vs 0woy wy wft AOR'N'4w, "*ww 4w COUNTY or t rtm), iwj� varmto iwsTxtjj4Tw" Or tKMY*xr"tNO 0"Aro ro"C'm AMY Or THIS LAW ''I""D 'Lot Twx ADM '&MN%@w low* Wo ACA114ST PIAT, Net DhTlM "IS _,_ DAY OF . . . . ............... . . 19" www 0*0 Aw FA bm 0% lhft%� IllooU Mfill *Opp", #*ww w 1, 00 vAwdM wM pw#, . . .... WA No %0#0wt I LIM 9 COLLRC-MR moo (114Y) Mt-;TSPSMt-;TSPSFit. ("7) "1-23" STATE OF ILLINOIS I at In ar-rM 0=11 I, I 'CAT, d vo�w COVWry or COOK I Ar,F*qvvbE1 rv% 7WI,%l0jxj, Mm w,,,%WI ove, T%"rm Do' Cwr Cvutm- TLLIHIOIS, it "or""" 11p*X1 "I COWAM, lk d bw &* 0#400w --ft-wag- w 0 a - 044, � AM4 04M ikww* ** #4 04K, .04, 4-04, * TWI VILL)-Off OF HOVWT PvtosplICT, 1" A!1 of . ....... . . ...41111 , '04*, owwww "4 wowwwo 00 wowfflAwl 0 0- 44 *"** 4 *W*04 ON WWI *.A *#MAW, 0 *a w.% ="4*:l ATLAA-FiiiiFl . . . . ........ ------ ...... ... tt IkTTV FT , Net "a -ei7 aw FA bm 0% lhft%� IllooU Mfill o -mu -Ij SHEET 1 OF 2 moo (114Y) Mt-;TSPSMt-;TSPSFit. ("7) "1-23" iXi IY WINt# 'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT t AWA, '40 Community Development Department M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ��►. �°T�.. FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT � i DATE: NOVEMBER 12,, 1999 RE: ZBA 32-99 DEARBORN VILLAS PUD MODIFICATION AND VARIATION To INCREASE PERMITTED LOT COVERAGE TO CONSTRUCT PATIOS/DECKS 3032-3034 W. ALGONQUIN ROAD ADEL SOTOLONG0 (APPLICANT) The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use for Modification of and approved Planned Unit Development and a Variation to increase permitted lot coverage from 50% to 5 1 % to permit 10' by 12' decks/patios for a 22 -unit duplex development. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their October 28, 1999 meeting. Jeff Perkins, Planner described the proposal and subject property in terms of Conditional Use, PUD, and Variation standards and gave staff Is recommendation of approval of the PUD modification and denial of the requested Variation, due to lack of hardship. Mr. Adel Sotolongo, applicant, spoke briefly in favor of the proposal. He agreed with staff's analysis regarding the lack of a true hardship for the proposed Variation. He added that he still felt that the proposal would result in a better development, both for future residents and for the Village as a whole. No other people spoke during the public hearing. The ZBA briefly discussed the proposal and the Zoning Code Conditional Use, PUD, and Variation standards. The ZBA then voted 4-0 to recommend approval of a PUD Modification and Variation to increase permitted lot coverage from 50% to 5 1 %. /JP MINYA: ill 2=61.1 ism I ps EL 2 m *AA 'FAA 1 . . ; . \ � ! { �} �. ! ® � ^ ` `' • �y J, MIN,. CES OF THE REGULAR MEETING G. ]PHE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO, ZBA-32-99 Hearing Date: October 28, 1999 PETITIONER: Dearborn, Villas, L.L.C. 3032-34 W. Algonquin Rd. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 3032-34 W. Algonquin Rd. PUBLICATION DATE: October 11, 1999 2AILY F -M -2A W? REQUEST: Conditional Use for modifications to a PUD and a Lot Coverage Variation to permit decks/patios for 22 residences M[EM[BERS, PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Leo Floras Richard Rogers MEMBERS ABSENT* Elizabeth Luxem Keith Youngquist STAFF MIEM[BERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICD, Deputy Director of Community Development Jeffery Perkins, Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Adel Sotolongo The meeting was called to order at 7:36 p.m. and the Board heard three cases previous to this case. At 8:45 p.m., Chairperson Juracek introduced Case No. ;SBA -32-99, a request for a Conditional Use for modifications to a PUD and a Lot Coverage Variation to permit decks/patios for 22 residences. Ms. Juracek opened the public hearing and inquired if notice of the case had been given. Mr. Perkins stated that public notice for this case had been given in the form of a newspaper legal ad, sips posted at the property, and a mailing to property owners within 250' of the subject property, Mr. Perkins then introduced the staff memorandum for the item, a Conditional Use for modifications to a PUD and Variations as required to permit decks/patios for 22 residences. He stated that the subject property was recently approved for a 22 -unit duplex Planned Unit Development that is currently under construction and that the current approval does not 'Include any patios or decks. He added that the applicant has begun selling units and has received 'interest from purchasers about adding decks or patios. He explained that the Zoning Code requires that changes to Planned Unit Developments that reduce the originally approved open space must be approved as an amendment to the PUD Mr. Perkins stated that the approved development includes 64,327 square feet of coverage on a 131,434 square foot site (48.9%) and that the R2 district 50% maximum lot coverage would allow an additional 1,390 square feet of lot coverage for the site, or 63.2 square feet per unit. He added that.the applicant is requesting a PUD Modification to add decks or patios and a Variation increasing the maximum lot coverage for the site from 50% to 51% to permit 120 square foot (10' X 12') decks for each unit. Mr. Perkins stated that the reason the petitioner is requesting the PUD modification and Variation is that the proposed 10' X 12' decks would provide a more functional amenity for the future unit owners in the development. 's He added that the application does not propose a hardship rationale for the Variation. Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-32-99 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 Mr. Perkins acknowledged the applicant's contention that the proposed Variation would tend to make the overall development more appealing and functional for future residents. He added that the decks would promote a better development and would not have a detrimental effect on public health, safety, morals, comfort, general welfare, utility provision, or public streets. He further, stated that the proposed improvements could have a positive impact by making the development more appleali:ng to residents. He explained that, unfortunately,) the applicant does not have a hardshlP, as speci,fied by the Zoning, Ordinance, related to site conditions. Based on its analysis of the proposal with respect to Zoning Code PUD and Conditional Use standards, Mr. Perkins gavestaff s recommendation that the ZBA recommend approval of a Conditional Use to modify the PUD to permit patios or decks on the units up toy 50% lot coverage. Based on its analysis of the proposal with respect to Zoning 10, 1 Code Variation standards,,, Mr. Perkins, ns, gave staff's 'recommendation that the ZBA deny the proposed lot coverag I h e Variation due to a lack of hardship. He informed the :SBA that the Villa geB,oard's decision is final for this, caso�. Ms. Juracek asked if all the units could have 6'x 10' decks or patios without exceeding the maximum lot coverage a need for a Variation. Mr. Perkins said they could. Mr. Adel Sotolongo, was sworn in. He explained the Dearborn Group purchased the project from Insignia Homes. He said that if he had been involved in the project from the start, he would have requested permission for 10 x 12 patios/decks, for all the units at that time. As it stands, the first owners could request permits for larger decks and the development would remain within the established maximum lot coverage, but owners of units built later would not be able to have decks/patios because the lot coverage would be met by the first owners. Mr. Perkins reminded members that the development has a private street, which also counts against the percentage of lot coverage, whereas a dedicated road R.O.W. would not be included in lot coverage. Mr. Cotten pointed out the development was helping the Village by maintaining their own street and they could dedicate the street back to the Village and have a sufficient percentage of lot coverage for patios/decks. Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the request for a Conditional Use for modifications to a PUD and Variations as required to permit decks/patios for 22 residences. Leo Floros seconded the motion, UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros, Juracek, Rogers NAYS: None Motion was approved 4-0. At 9:05 p.m., Leo Floros made motion to adjourn seconded by Richard Rogers. Meeting was adjourned. ..... ..... . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . ------ ...... .. .. .. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary r. ins nner, w. \\VMV02\DEMCOMBEV \GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 199,,9\Min,,,,, tes\ZBA-"3"',2,-99 Dearbom.doc I "LLUAGL OF,M,OUNT PROSPECI Community Development Department PW 010104w M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEIC, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JEFF PERKINS, DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1999 HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1999 SUBJECT: ZBA-32-99 DEARBORN VILLAS, 3032-3034 ALGONQUIN ROAD CONDITIONAL USE FOR A MODIFICATION TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND A VARIATION TO PERMIT PATIOS OR DECKS IN REAR "AICD S BACKGROUND INFORMATION Petitioner: Adel Sotolongo Dearborn Villas, L.L.C. 3032 W. Algonquin Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Status of Petitioner: Owner and developer of the Property Parcel Numbers: 08-15-400-036 and 08-15-400-038 Lot Size: 3.02 Acres +(131,434 square feet) Existing Zoning: R-2 Single Family Attached Residence (PUD) Existing Land Use: Vacant Lot Coverage: 489% approved 51.0% current proposal Requested Action: P.U.D. Modification and Variation to permit the addition of patios or decks to the mar of the approved duplexes (Dearborn Villas, formerly owned by Insignia Homes). BACKGROUND AND PROPOSED VARIATION The subject property was recently approved for a 22 unit duplex Planned Unit Development that 'is currently under construction. The current approval does not includeany pat'los, or decks for the units., Tbeapplicanthas begun selling units and has received interest from purchasers a,bout a,,d,dt'ng decks or pattos. Zonling Code Section 14.504.1) requires that changes to Planned Unit Developments, that reduce, the open space 'that was originally approved must be approved as an amendment to the P.U.D. The applicant is also requesting an increase to the maximum lot coverage of 50% for the R2 Zoning District. The currently approved development includes 64,327 square feet of buildings and pavement on a 131,434 sure foot site (48.9% lot coverage). The 50%n aximum, lot coverage would allow, an additional 1,390 square feet, of lot coverage for the site, or 63.2 square, feet pernit. The applicant requests, a Variation top emlit 120 ZBA-23-98 Dearborn Villas P.U.L,. Modification and Variation Meeting of October 28, 1999 Page 2 square foot (10' X 12') decks for each unit. If each unit were built with a deck of that size, the lot coverage for the site would be 66,967 square feet (51.0°/x). The petitioner's rationale for the variation is that the proposed 10' X 12' decks would provide a more functional amenity for the future unit owners in the development. The application does not propose a rationale for the Variation related to hardship. To conduct its analysis of the proposed variation, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey and site plan and visited the site. Planned Unit Developments Standards Zoning Code Section 14.504.C. lists standards for Planned Unit Developments. The section contains four specific findings that must be made in order to approve a conditional use. These standards relate to: u any reductions in Zoning Code requirements are in the public interest c3 proposed exceptions would not adversely impact the value of any adjacent property. L3 that any exceptions made are for the purpose of promoting better development u that density is not increased more than 10% over the requirements of the zoning district L3 that all buildings in the PUD are placed so as to minimize impacts on adjacent properties, perimeter and transitional setbacks are met, and open space requirements of the underlying zoning district are not reduced. The proposed PUD modification seeks relief from Zoning Code open space requirements. The proposed decks are in the public interest, in that their addition would tend to make the overall development more appealing and functional for future residents. The decks would also promote a better development. The proposal does not increase the site density and would not have an impact on adjacent developments. However, the proposal asks for a reduction in required open space, which violates the final standard. Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. As an amendment to an existing P.U.D. the pending request must also be measured against these standards. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: • The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and 1w • Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The proposed Conditional Use would not have a detrimental effect on public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. The site is located in a residential area with, a, tn,*x of single-fitm,"t an I W I I I y , d multi -family units and the current proposal adds a commonplace amenity for residential, developments. 'The proposed 1, development, wou]4 0 0 W 1, ity, provision or public streets. In fhct, tht roposed have no negative impact on the a4jacent area, uffli , 'J. p improvements could have a positive fb impact by making, the development mom appealing to, residents. ',e ZBA-23-98 Dearborn Villas P.U.Lo. Modification and Variation Meeting of October 28, 1999 Page 3 proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance will the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements, except where Variations are requested. Variation Standards 41 Required findi,n,gs for all vartiations, are conla"ned in Section 14.2030.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning 'if ""ngs that must be made in order to approve a vari,ationt. These Code., The section contains seven speci, ic f 'indI 0 standards relate, to* L3 A, hardshipi due tothe physical surroundings, shape,, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally appli,cable to f other propme ertlies, in the say zoning district and not created by any person presently, having, an interest in the property1," t3 Intent of variation is not to increase financial gain; and 13 protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The subject parcel is a generally rectangular parcel without any unusual site topography or soils, currently under development with the maximum permitted number of units. Thus, the applicant does not have a legitimate 0, hardship related to the physical surroundings, shape, or,topogra,phl,c,a,lcond"lt*lon,s of the site. The rationale given for the proposed variation is related to the quality of It"fe, for future residents of the development", rather than strictly economic factors, although the proposed decks may also increase the value of units in the development. The proposed decks would not have a negative effect on public welfare or neighborhood character. The requested Conditional Use meets the required standards outlined above. Based on these findings, the Zoning Ordinance permits the Board to approve this request. Therefore, in keeping with Zoning Ordinance requirements, Staff recommends g!,pproval of a Conditional Use to modify the approved Planned Unit Development to permit patios or decks on the units up to a maximum of 50% lot coverage. The proposed Variation from Section 14.1105.0.1 to permit an increase to maximum lot coverage is prohibited by Zoning Ordinance Section 14.504.0 (P.TU.D. Standards) and does not meet the Variation standards in Section 14.2030.9. Therefore, Staff recommends denial of the proposed Variation. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William J. Cdoney,, AICD, Uhector of Community Development /JP HAGEWLNGZBA\ZBA 19991Staff Memos\ZBA-32-99 Memo (Dearbom).doc VILLAGE OF'MOUNT PROSPE Community p'"artment M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: MIC11AEF.1 JANONISI V11,LAGE MANAGER I [VA M ZBA 26-99 TACO BELUKFC — CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATIONS FOR EST 7.N-twr17H A DRIVE-THROUGII FACILITY 820 E. RAND ROAD THOMAS SCEZNIAK (APPLICANT) f3� The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use and Variations to permit construction of a fast food restaurant with a drive-through facility. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their October 28, 1999 meeting. Jeff Perkins, Planner described the proposed use and site, and described the site in terms of the provisions of the Rand Road Corridor Plan and Zoning Code Standards for Conditional Uses and Variations. Based on a review of the proposal with respect to Zoning Code standards, Mr. Perkins gave staff s recommendation of approval of the proposal, with the conditions listed below. Mr. T'homas Scezniak, applicant, spoke briefly in favor of the proposal. He expressed the applicant's willingness to provide a cross -access agreement between the subject parcel and adjacent properties and stated that the agreement will in place before the Village Board hears the Conditional Use request. He also stated that Taco Twins would be willing t* provide a split -face block structure, to fulfill the condition requiring an all masonry building. No other people spoks during the public hearing. The ZBA briefly discussed the proposal and the Zoning Code Conditional Use and Variation standards. The ZBA then voted 4-0 to recornmend approval of a Conditional Use and Variations to allow parking spaces to encroach 20' into the required front setback, reduce the site parking requirement from 40 to 37, and reduce the required stacking for the drive-through from 8 to 7 for a fast food restaurant with a drive-through, with the following conditions: 1. Development of the site in conformance with the site plan prepared by Thomas V. Scezniak Associates dated July 20, 1999 and revised September 15, 1999 (Attachment 1). 2. Submission of a final landscape plan in general conformance with the preliminary' plan prepared by Thomas V. Scezniak Associates,, dated July 20, 1999 and revised September 15, 1999, revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. Development of the building in general conformance with elevations prepared by Thomas V. Scezniak Associates dated July 20, 1999 and modified to provide for masonry construction. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Develo'pment Code requirements. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. William Cooney Jr., AICP EN H:\G[-,"N\P[,NG\ZBA\ZBA 1999\MEJ Memos\ZBA-26-99 Memo 'Faso Bell) mem memo.doc Lo+ca onp Case No. IBA 26-99 Taco Bell Conditional Use and NVariations Prepared By: Village of Mount Prospect Depart ent of Community Development - Planning Division June 17,1999 M � u uy' Dr GRADING PLAN . ... 4w A r yA' 0..5i y � u e � R �,fyrNi,� '1�iiuwm. mm ib a mm�v, \\` y1�y, v � r WAAW 4" 04 RAIMP611d -,Jk v.ate .— TT e own 0 v aw T —M mailift tail a V4=6 A*Wd 604 r4- REAR ELEVATION 0 4AAL Mb" dI ISL W" Ono, rt w"m & Awac mat .60 sw-r AM yo 31 ViL ► wi PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: 6 PUBLICATION DATE. MEMBERS PRESENT: I Imam leg 0,00 It MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Hearing Date: October 28, 1999 Taco Twins 2275 Half Day Road, Suite 300 Bannockburn, IL 60015 820 E. Rand Road Conditional Use and Variations to establish a fast food restaurant with a drive-through window Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Leo Floros Richard Rogers Elizabeth Luxem Keith Youngquist Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Jeffery Perkins, Planner Thomas V. Scezniak The meeting was called to order at 736 p.m. At 7:40 p.m., Chairperson Juracek introduced Case No. IBA -26-99, a request tor a Conditional Use and Variations to establish a fast food restaurant with a drive-through window. Ms. Juracek opened the public hearing and inquired if notice of the case had been given. Mr. Perkins stated that public notice for this case had been given in the form of a newspaper legal ad, signs posted at the property, and a mailing to property owners within 250' of the subject property. Mr. Perkins then 'Introduced the staff memorandum for the item, a Conditional Use an'd Variations for the establishment of a drive-through Taco Bell/K.F.C. restaurant Mr. Perkins stated that the subject property is the vacant former Giordano's Pizza Restaurant site that was damaged by an automobile accident in 1994 and demolished in 1997, leaving the parking lots and curb cuts to Rand Road remaining on the parcel. He stated that the property has covenants requiring cross -access between the property and the properties to the east and that the applicant proposes to maintain the cross -access and one of the existing curb cuts. He also stated that the proposed plans include provisions for extending cross -access to the Menard's property to the north. Mr. Perkins described the proposed Conditional Use for a drive-through Taco Bell/K.F.C. restaurant. He stated that the drive-through would be located on the northeast side of the building about 15 feet from the rear property line and that the drive-through would be accessed from the site's main driveway. He added that customers would exit the drive-through via the parking lot or a north/south drive aisle at the east boundary of the site shared with the bowling alley property. Mr. Perkins stated that the proposed restaurant is a 3,302 s.f. off-white dryvit structure with a 3' brown masonry block base, purple and red awnings, a red cupola, and red, white and purple accent bands. He stated that the building would meet all setback and height requirements. He then reminded the ZBA that both they and the Village Board have long Zoning Board of Appeals Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ZBA-26-99 Page 2 standing policies of requiring masonry construction for new buildings in the Village and cited recent examples such as Steak 'n Shake, Borders, Country Inns and Suites and Menard's. He recommended that the ZBA enforce the masonry construction policy with this project also. Mr. Perkins stated that the proposed parking lots meet the minimum 10' setback from property lines adjacent to non- residential property. He added that the site is across .and Road from a vacant RI zoned parcel, which would require a 30' setback from that property line and that the proposal includes a 10' setback, so a Variation would be required. Mr. Perkins outlined the Zoning Code parking requirements for Fast-food Restaurants of 12 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area, plus eight stacking spaces per drive-through and stated that the proposed 3,302 square foot restaurant would require 40 parking spaces and eight stacking spaces. He then stated that the proposal includes 37 spaces and 7 stacking spaces and thus requires a Variation for those items. Mr. Perkins described the provisions of the Rand Road Corridor Plan, which call for the development of a "loop road" to allow for cross -access between commercial uses on the north side of Rand Road from Business Center Drive to Mount Prospect Plaza and for reducing the number of curb cuts on .and Road. He explained that the proposed site - plan eliminates one curb cut from the site and provides for cross -access connections between the subject parcel and nearby commercial parcels. He added that the owners of the subject property and bowling alley property have submitted documentation of an existing cross -access agreement between the properties. He then briefly described modifications to the Menard's, Wal-Mart, and bowling alley properties the cross -access would require and stated that negotiations are under way to finalize the configuration of the cross -access. Mr. Perkins discussed the subject property in terms of the Zoning Code Standards for Conditional Uses. He stated that the proposed use would be on a vacant parcel in an established commercial area, formerly occupied by a restaurant and that the proposed restaurant and drive-through will be similar in intensity to the former use of the site. He stated that the site plan furthers the goals of the Rand Road Corridor Plan by eliminating a curb cut to Rand Road and advancing the development of cross -access between commercial uses. He added that the proposal should have no negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets and may help improve circulation. He further stated that the proposed Conditional Use will comply with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements, except where Variations are requested, would not affect the essential character of the area, and would have no significant effect on the public welfare. Mr. Perkins then described the proposal in ter -ins of the Zoning Code Standard for Variations. He stated that the subject parcel is a small, nearly triangular, property with existing cross -access easements and additional Village requirements for cross -access, which make the site difficult to develop and added those factors supported a positive finding regarding a hardship due to the unique characteristics of the site. He added that site conditions and Village and IDOT requirements to improve traffic circulation, rather than financial gain were the reasons for the proposed Variations. He also stated that any negative effects from the proposed Variations would be outweighed by the public benefits from eliminating a curb cut and promoting development of the cross -access. He said that because of those factors, positive findings could be made regarding the purpose of the proposed variation and the protection of the public welfare and neighborhood character. P, Based on its analysis of the proposal with respect to Zoning Code standards for Con'ditional Uses and Variations, Mr. Perkins gave staff s recommendation that the ZBA recommend to the Village Board approval of the proposal, with the conditions outlined in the staff report. He also informed the ZBA that the Village Board is final for the item. Leo Floros asked if this, proposal would have an adverse affect on the Jiffy Lube next to the property and Mr. Perkins said they would not be affected. al Thomas V. Scezniak, 1754 W. Wise Road in Schaumburg, was sworn in. He testified that he had worked over the plans for many months with the Planning staff. He said there is a cross -access agreement in place that they are re- working to include Menard's legal counsel. This agreement will be finished and in place before appearing before the Village Board. Mr. Scezniak pointed out on an exhibit the stormwater detention area and said they are going to save I Zoning Board of Appeals Arlene Juracek, Chairperson ZBA-26-99 Page 3 the trees in that area. He stated that Taco Twins would acquiesce to the Village's condition for an all masonry building by providing a split -face block structure. Ms. Juracek said the Board appreciated their cooperation with having an all masonry building. She explained the Board does not approve of Dryvit type materials because of rotting due to weather conditions. Mr. Floros asked if the Taco Twins was a franchisee. Mr. Scezniak said yes, they have 21 Taco Bellsin the Chicago area, Mr. Floros asked about the 'Other Taco Bell on Rand Road, wouldn't that be too close. Mr. Seezniak said no, the traffic patterns were entirely different and the proposed combination restaurant would be very lucrative. Ms. Juracek asked how soon they planned to open. Mr. Scesniak said that, depending on weather conditions, would probably start construction in the spring. Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the request for a Conditional Use and Variations to establish a fast food restaurant with a drive-through window, with the seven conditions imposed by staff and an addition to Condition #3, providing that the accent trim will not be made of E.I.F.S. Leo Floros seconded the motion, rovi i I UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cotton, Floros, Juracek, Rogers 110 "1- I U 0) RM� MA# The ZBA heard three additional cases. At 9:05 p.m., Leo Floros, made motion to adjourn, seconded by Richard Rogers. Meeting was adjourned. \\VMV02\DEPT'NCOMDEV\GENIP LNG\ZBA\ZBA 1999\Minutes\ZBA-26I-99 Taco Twins.doc VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT "MG AL m- W1111 Community Development Department M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEKCHAIRPERSON FROM: JEFF PERKINS, PLANNE1M DATE: OCTOBER 22, 1999 0 SUBJECT: ZBA-26-99/COND NAL USE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FAST-FOOD RESTAURANT W1rM A DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOW Petitioner: Taco Twins, Inc. 2275 Half Day Road Bannockburn, IL 60015 Property Address: 820 E. Rand Road Status of Petitioner: Lessee of the Property Parcel Number: 03-35-300-011 Lot Size: 1.12 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Lot Coverage: 62% proposed 75% mwdmwn per B-3 district Requested Action: Proposal for a Conditi 0 -nal Use to allow the establishment of a fast-food restaurant with a drive- through window. The subject property is a vacant property that formerly contained a Giordano's Pizza Restaurant. The building was damaged by an automobile accident in 1994 and demolished in 1997, leaving the parking lots and curb cuts to Rand Road remaining on the parcel. The property has covenants requiring cross access to and between the property, the bowling alley property, and the banquet hall property, both located to the east of the subject property. The applicant proposes to maintain the cross access and one of the existing curb cuts. The proposed plans also include provisions for extending cross access to the Menard's property to the north. The petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to allow a drive-through facility associated with a proposed Taco Bell/K.F.C. restaurant. As illustrated on the attached site plan, the drive-through would be located on the northeast side of the building and set back approximately 15 feet from the rear property line. Vehicles will access the drive- through from the main driveway of the site and will exit to Rand Road through the parking lot or via a north/south drive aisle at the east boundary of the site shared with the bowling alley property. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of October 28, 1999 ZBA-26-99 Page 2 The site plan, as proposed, will require three Variations; to reduce the parking requirement from 40 parking spaces to 37 spaces; to reduce the front parking setback from 30' to 10% and to reduce required stacking from 8 spaces to 7 spaces. To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use and Variations, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, plot plan, and elevations and visited the site. ANALYSIS Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: North: B-3 Community Shopping District / Home Center, Auto Service, Restaurant, Bank, Grocery Store South: B-3 Community Shopping District / Discount Store East: B-4 Business Retail & Service / Bowling Alley, Banquet Hall, Offices West: R.-1 Single Family Residence Nacant Parcel B-3 Community Shopping District/Hair Salon Approval Process The subject site is in the B-3 Community Shopping. "Restaurants" are listed as Permitted Uses in the B-3 district. "Drive-through and drive in establishments" are listed as Conditional Uses in the B-3 district. The proposed restaurant with drive-through will require approval of a Conditional Use for the drive-through. The site, as proposed, will require Variations to Zoning Code requirements for number of parking spaces, stacking requirements, and front parking setback. The items may be considered as a single proposal, requiring approval by the Village Board, following a public hearing and recommendation by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Comprehensive Plan Designation The Village's Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property for general commercial and office uses. The proposed fast-food restaurant is an appropriate use within this designation. The Rand Road Corridor Study calls for the site to be developed for a general commercial use oriented to take advantage of shared parking and access with the parcels to the east. The proposed use is appropriate to the site and provision for cross access is made in the proposal. Cross -access issues will be discussed more completely later in this report. Structure and Elevations The proposed structure is a 3,302 s.f. fast food building that would be constructed with a primarily E.I.F.S. stucco finish (off-white) and a 3' masonry block base (brown). The elevations also include purple and red awnings, a red cupola, and red, white and purple accent bands. The building meets all setback and height requirements. The ZBA and Village Board both have long standing policies of requiring masonry construction for new buildings in the Village (Steak and Shake, Borders, Country Inns and Suites, Menard's, etc.), which should be enforced with the subject parcel to maintain that policy. Landscape Plan The applicant has submitted a preliminary Landscape Plan for the property. The plan includes a large sodded retention area at the south end of the parcel, a perimeter landscape area a minimum of 10' wide around all parking lots, and foundation plantings. Over 43% of the proposed site is devoted to green space. The plan also calls for preservation of Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of October 28, 1999 ZBA-26-99 Page 3 five existing pine trees on the site. Sufficient landscape materials to meet code requirements are provided in the foundation planting areas, landscape islands, and in the perimeter buffer to the non-residential property to the east. I Additional landscape materials are required in the perm meater 'buffers to the north and so,tuth property lines and along the Rand Road feonta,,. Per Zoning, Code Section 1,4.2306.D, shrub and tree plantings a rniinimum of 3' in height must be p ided across 50%, of the n1orth, perimeter of the park" iveway. According to rov, t ing area and to the south of the main dr* Zoning Code Section 14.2306.0, shrub and tree plantings a minimum of 3' in height must be provided across 100% of the parking lot perimeter along the Rand Road frontage. Cross Access Issues The Rand Road Corridor plan calls for the development of a "Loop Road" to allow for cross access between the various commercial uses on the north side of Rand Road from Business Center Drive to Mount Prospect Plaza. The Corridor Plan also calls for reduction of the number of curb cuts in this area. The proposed site plan calls for the elimination of the north curb cut existing on the site. Provision is also made for the continuation of a cross access connection between the subject parcel, the bowing alley, Bristol Court Banquets, the office condominium behind the banquet hall, Menard's, Aldi, and the out parcels to the Menard's site. The owners of the subject property and bowling alley property have submitted documentation indicating an existing cross -access agreement between the two properties. The current proposed configuration of the cross access would require modifications to the Menard's and bowling alley properties. Negotiations are under way to finalize the proposal. The Wal-Mart site is not directly adjacent to the subject property. Future provision for connection of the "Loop Road" to that site may be provided in the future and is not hindered by the current proposal. Setbacks The proposed structure is set back at least 42 feet from all property lines and, therefore, meets all required building setbacks. Parking lots in the B-3 District must be set back a minimum of 10' from any property line where the site is adjacent to non-residential property. The proposed lots meet the 10' setback requirements adjacent to non-residential property. Parking lots in the B-3 District must meet required building setbacks where the site is adjacent to (or across the street from) residential property. The proposed lot is across Rand Road from a vacant parcel currently zoned R-1 Single-family Residential. This would require a 30' setback from Rand Road for the lot. The proposed site has a 10' setback. The site is an odd shaped parcel with a cross -access easement cutting through it. Additionally the Village requires a portion of the site to allow for development of the cross -access route called for by the Rand Road Corridor Plan. Based on those circumstances, the ZBA can find that a hardship exists for the requested setback Variation. Providing for development of the "Loop Road" allows the Village to improve roadway conditions in the area and fulfill requirements of the Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, the property across Rand Road from the site is vacant and almost certainly will be developed for a non- residential or multi -family residential land use. Thus, the ZBA can make the other required findings for the requested esl Variation. Parking and Stacking Section 14.2224 lists a parking requirement for Fast-food Restaurants of three spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area, plus eight stacking spaces per drive-through window. As proposed, the site would consist of a 3,302 square foot fast-food restaurant with a drive-through lane, requiring 40 parking spaces and eight stacking spaces. The proposal includes 37 parking spaces and 7 stacking spaces. Thus, the site does not meet its requirement for parking spaces or stacking. Variations will be required for those 'Items. The rationale for these Variations is also related to the shape of the parcel and requirements for provision of cross -access. Based on those circumstances, the ZBA can find that a hardship exists for the requested Variations. Improvements to safety Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of October 28, 1999 ZBA-26-99 Em in the area and fulfilling Comprehensive Plan requirements by providing for cross access to and from nearby properties allow the ZBA to make other required findings for the requested Variation. Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: L3 The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; c3 The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; L3 Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and L3 Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. mercial area, The sutject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a vacant ' parcel 'in an established,, com� formerly 41 ,occupied by a restaurant., The applicant, proposes to es'tablish a new restaurant with a dri've-through, on the parcel. The I I proposed restaurant, wt i i i i i ity to the f,rrt, er use of the site. Provisions have been made on the site plan to eliminate a curb cut to Rand Road and to further the development of cross access between nearby commercial uses as called for in the Rand Road Corridor Plan. Thus, the proposal should have little or no negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets and may help improve circulation in the area. The proposed Conditional Use will comply with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements, except where Variations are requested. The essential character of the area — a sub -regional commercial center — would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. Variation Standards Required findings for all Variations are contained in Section 14-203C.9 of the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Code. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Varl*ation. These standards relate to: L3 A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Li lack of desire to increase financial gain; and L3 protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The subject parcel is a small, nearly triangular, property with an existing cross -access easement and additional Village requirements for cross -access. Those constraints make the site difficult to develop for the uses permitted by the Zoning Code. Thus, a positive finding regarding a hardship due to the unique characteristics of the site can be made. The proposed Variations are necessitated by site conditions, along with Village and IDOT requirements to improve traffic conditions in the area, rather than financial conditions. Any negative effects from the proposed Variations will be outweighed by the public benefits from eliminating a curb cut and promoting development of the cross access. Thus, a positive finding can be made regarding the purpose of the proposed variation and the 'Protection of the public welfare and neighborhood character. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of October 28, 1999 ZBA-26-99 RECOMMENDATION Page 5 The proposal meets the Conditional Use and Variation standards contained in Sections 14-2031.8 and 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance and will help further the Village's goals for traffic improvements in the area. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to pp rove the requested Conditional Use and Variations for a fast food restaurant with drive-through at 820 E. Rand Road, Case No. ZBA-26- 99, with the following conditions: L Development of the site in conformance with the site plan prepared by Thomas V. Scezniak Associates dated July 20, 1999 and revised September 15, 1999 (Attachment 1). 2. Submission of a final landscape plan in general conformance with the preliminary plan prepared by Thomas V. Scezniak Associates, dated July 20, 1999 and revised September 15, 1999, revised to meet all requirements of Article 23 of the Zoning Ordinances. 3. Development of the building in general conformance with elevations prepared by Thomas V. Scezniak Associates dated July 20, 1999 and modified to provide for masonry construction. 4. Submittal and approval of final engineering plans meeting all Development Code requirements. 5. Submittal of final building plans meeting all applicable Building Code and Fire Code requirements. 6. Approval of appropriate permits by I.D.O.T. and M.W.R.D. 7. Submittal of documentation conclusively demonstrating the existence of cross access agreements between the subject property and adjacent properties (Thunderbird Lanes and Menard's) prior to consideration of the Conditional Use by the Village Board. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: William Y Cooney, A10�13, Director of Community Development V" \\VMV,CQ\DF,PT=,MD,MC3EWLNG"\MA\.MA 1999\Staff Memos\ZBA-26-99 Memo (taco Bell).doc TO", VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS 16 FROM: FORESTRY I GROUNDS SUPERINTENDENT DATE: NOVEMBER 101, 1999 Union Pacific Railroad Company is seeking the execution of a new Railroad Right -of -Way Landscape Beautification Lease, governing planting and maintenance activities on their right -of - no tat, er than December 31, 1999. Attached is a copy of the lease documentand proposed sMeations., I reqoast that the Village BoaTdreview these idocuuments at, the Noven iber I pecl Board meeting, and authorize execution of the lease. From 1984 through 1990, the Village spent over $100,000 to beautify the former Chicago and Northwestern Railroad Right -of Way with extensive landscape plantings. We received several local and national awards for this effort. We continue to spend thousands of dollars annually to maintain this area because it is a major traffic corridor in our town. Thus its appearance greatly influences Mount Prospect's public image. In 1997, we received word from the new owner, Union Pacific, that our previous beautification lease with Chicago and Northwestern- was out of date and would be cancelled. Additionally, they advised us that many of the trees and shrubs we had planted on the right-of-way would need removal or pruning because they were in violation of Union Pacific regulations and/or state law. The state law,, designed to reduce sight obstructions, states that 'Every rail carrier operating within this state shall remove from its right-of-way at all grade crossings within the state, such brush, shrubbery and trees as is reasonably practical for a distance of not less than 500 feet in either direction from each grade crossing." Union Pacific also related that their company rules required a 16 foot clear zone,, as measured from the outside edge of the railroad ties, into which no plant material could grow for the entire length of the railroad right-of-way. They claimed that this was necessary so their engineers could readily view all signs and signals placed along the tracks. We responded to Union Pacific's letter in October 1997, by returning their lease document with several proposed modifications. We also reminded them that all plantings from 100 feet west of Main Street to 100 feet east of Emerson Street had been approved by the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) after an extensive public hearing in 1985. We also met with Union Pacific staff and agreed to initially remove or prune a number of plantings, including most of the Mount Prospect Road Entrance Marker landscaping, which they felt constituted the most obvious obstructions. Union Pacific advised us that they felt that the 500 foot requirement was excessive when crossings are regulated with gates and signals, but that the Illinois Commerce Commission was 'a pressing them to strictly enforce that requirement. Attempts were subsequently made to change the law,, but in early 1998 it was determined that those attempts had failed. At that time, it was decided that individual municipalities would likely have to undergo individual hearings with the ICC in an attempt to save selected vegetation. In May 1998, representatives from Union Pacific, the ICC,, and the Village 'inspected every Union Pacific railroad crossing in Mount Prospect. We jointly agreed that the Village would remove or prune down to three feet, many more plantings within 300 feet of the crossings, which Union Pacific and the ICC deemed to be "material obstructions". We also agreed to relocate the Mount Prospect Road Entrance Marker sign 300 &et to the west. Additionally, we were told we would need an ICC Exemption Order to retain the plantings growing 300-500 feet from crossings. At that time Union Pacific asked again'that we execute a new beautification lease. We responded by sending them additional proposed modifications, which we felt reflected the on- site agreements made in May. We also worded the proposed lease specifications to allow different standards for new versus existing plantings. By July 1998 we had completed all requested removals and pruning, as well as the sign relocation. We notified Union Pacific,, they inspected the work, and requested yet more work, which we completed in August 1998. By this time we had removed a total of 65 trees and shrubs, and pruned hundreds of additional trees and shrubs'. at Union Pacific's request. We heard nothing further until April 1999, when I attended a Northwest Municipal Conference %.10 meeting. There I met with representatives of both the ICC and Union Pacific. I learned that we would need to take the following steps in order to finally resolve the remaining issues. 1. Send a landscape plan show insz all existing and future plantings to Union Pacific for their approval. 2. Negotiate the terms of the beautification lease with Union Pacific's legal department. (They told me they would be responding to the changes we had proposed.) 3. If Union Pacific agrees with our landscape plan and proposed lease, submit both to the ICC, along with a petition prepared by Union Pacific. If the ICC agrees, they would then issue a declaratory order allowing our plantings without a formal hearing. 4. If we cannot come to terms with either Union Pacific or the ICC in the above steps, a formal ICC hearing would need to be scheduled. DISCUSSION Our landscape plan is currently being finalized by our Engineering Division and will be ready by the end of November. We will be including proposed new plantings for the "front yard" of the train station, and plantings around the new bungalows being installed by Union Pacific. Since we have removed all existing plants that Union Pacific and the ICC requested, hopefully there will be no problem with this plan being accepted. The lease document does have the potential for being problematic. Although we have twice sent proposed modifications to Union Pacific, they have never officially responded to our proposal. We were told they would work with individual municipalities on a case-by-case basis,, but the latest version we received is a generic document sent to all municipalities. It does not include any of the modifications we requested. Attached to this memo are three items. Attachment A is the main body of the lease document, with which I have no problem. Attachment B is the "Specifications" that Union Pacific proposes to become part of the lease. This is the document I have problems with, since it contradicts what was agreed to on-site and would require many additional tree removals. Attachment C is our proposed revision to the specifications. Our proposed specifications differ from Union Pacific's in sections L 2 and 4, plus we have added a new section 10. The differences and their importance are detailed below: 1, has been modified to prevent the removal of many additional existing plantings. The reason this is a problem is that our old lease allowed us to install trees and shrubs .1 5 feet from the center gf Jh_q ogtside !,!aand did not address ire growth of plants into the clear zone. Union Pacific now wants to restrict any Rro3Ah, not just installation of plants into the zone 16 feet from the edee, of' i . Because of overhead 30 Lhp, outside fie� wires,, we previously planted many tall growing plants on or very near the 15 foot boundary. We have already pruned off the track side of many of these trees, but if the specification is approved as in 41 Union Pacific's version, we would need to ggirely, remove, many more plantings. In our version, we would be' agreeing to follow their new requirements for any newplantings, but abide by the old standard for existing plantings. • Ionn, has been modified to allow different standards for new versus existing plantings in regards to sight obstructions at crossings. We would be agreeing not to 'Install new plant materials which will grow more than three feet above the height of the adjacent ties, within 500 feet of any grade crossing. However, we would be agreeing to maintain existina, plant material near crossings as agreed to in the on-site inspections conducted in May 1998, and as shown on the plan we'll be submitting. During these inspections we laid out a sight triangle whose longest leg was 300 feet, and pruned or removed plantings within -that triangle as directed by Union Pacific and the ICC. Our proposed specifications reflect those agreements. •se_.Cti nA has been modified so that a flagman is not required for routine maintenance work such as mowing and weeding. This was previously agreed to in a letter I received from Union Pacific on May 2, 1996. Also, traditionally Union Pacific has borne the expense of a flagman when we have requested one for special projects such as retaining wall installation. Thus we have modified this section to reffeet this past practice. Section 10 is new language we added officially recognizing that the plantings installed around the train station were already exempted by the ICC in 1985. This fact seems to have been consistently overlooked by Union Pacific. --777777-77 7 0 1 recommend approval on November 16, 1999 of a resolution authorizing execution of the attached lease document (Attachment A), with the speciffications, listed on Attachment C. being included as part of this document. This will be sent to Union Pacific and if they also execute it, we will return to the Board at a later date with a petition, which must then be sent to the Illinois Commerce Commission. Sandy Clark concur: ..... ....... - ..................... .. .. .. . le R.. R. A X:FILES/IFOnSTRY/WORD/1999/MEMO-RR-ROW.DOC --- . .......... Ex►+�brr &A'A "T RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION LEASE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (hereinafter called "Company") hereby leases to the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS (hereinafter called "Lessee") to use for planting, pruning and otherwise maintaining landscaping ("Landscape Beautification") the entire Union Pacific right-of- way in Mount Prospect, Illinois, subject to the express terms and conditions of this Lease, the Specifications (the Specifications") attached hereto as Exhibit A and hereby made a part hereof, and a Landscape Beautification Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B and hereby made a part hereof (the "'Premises"). This Lease (the "Lease") shall become effective 1999 and shall run for a period of one year and thereafE-e-r-'-u'nless terminated as hereinafter provided. Lessee agrees to pay Company as rent for the Premises the sum of TEN AND N01100 DOLLARS ($10.00) per year payable annually in advance. Nothing herein shall limit or modify the terms and conditions of any other agreement between Company and Lessee for use of Company's right-of-way or any portion of the Premises for other than Landscape Beautification. This Lease is given upon the following express terms and conditions herein and the Specifications and Landscape Beautification Plan as finally authorized by the Illinois Commerce Commission (the "ICC Authorized Specifications") and should the Lessee at any time violate any of said terms, conditions or the ICC Authorized Specifications, or use or attempt to use the Premises for any other or different purpose than that stated herein, then the Company may, at its option, immediately terminate this Lease. As a material consideration for entering into this Lease and without which Company would not enter into same, Lessee covenants and agrees to indemnify, save harmless and protect the Company and the Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Railway Authority ("Metrall) from and against any and all loss, damage, injury, claim, demand, fine, lawsuit, judgment and/or liability, and any and all costs, expenses and legal fees in connection therewith by reason of injuries to or death of persons and/or 16 -ss of or damage to property and/or violation of any law, ordinance or regulation ("' Claim" ) to the extent such Claim arises out of or is connected with Lessee's Landscape Beautification of the Premises or any act or omission of (i) Lessee, its officers, employees, contractors, or agents, and/or (ii) and other person {s) performing any work or service for or on behalf of the Lessee on or about said Premises or arising out of their presence on said Premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall not be obligated to indemnify and hold harmless Company and Metra for personal injury, death and/or property damage to the extent arising out of the acts or omissions of the Company, Metra or the officers, employees, agents or contractors of either the Company or Metra. Company reserves the right to use, occupy and enjoy the Premises and its tracks, property and right-of-way, for such purpose, in such manner, and at such time as it shall desire, the same as if this instrument had not been executed by it, including the right to lease or license any of the Premises for commercial or industrial purposes without any prior notification to Lessee. Lessee accepts the Premises subject to the rights of any party, including Company, in and to any existing roadway, easements, permits or licenses. Lessee further accepts the Premises subject to rights of any party, including Company, in and to any existing telephone, telegraph, or other wires, and poles and facilities of any kind whatsoever, whether or not of record. Company reserves the right to maintain or relocate its existing facilities, or to construct and thereafter maintain new facilities, in the vicinity of the Premises with no liability for damages to Lessee's interests or Premises resulting from such beautification activities. Lessee recognizes and assumes all responsibility for all present and future environmental liability or responsibility imposed under applicable environmental laws, regulations or any other similar requirements relating to any contamination of the Premises or groundwater thereunder or discharge or release to adjacent property arising from or in any respect aggravated or altered by any operations or activities by, or any equipment or facilities used by or permitted on the Premises by Lessee in performance of Landscape Beautification (the foregoing hereinafter referred to as "Lessee Landscape Beautification Operations"). Lessee, therefore, agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Company, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all liability, fines penalties, claims, demands, loss or lawsuits brought by any third party or governmental -agency under any theory of law against Company seeking to hold Company liable for any investigation, response or cleanup costs, penalties or damages, whether personal property or environmental, for any contamination of any property or groundwater thereunder or discharge or release to adjacent property arising out of or in any respect aggravated or altered by Lessee Landscape Beautification Operations. Lessee agrees that the above indemnity extends to any liability resulting from or arising out of Lessee's implementation of any investigation, response or cleanup plan approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency or companion state agency. Lessee further agrees to undertake at its own expense any investigation, response or cleanup of any contamination of the Premises and groundwater thereunder arising from or in any respect aggravated or altered by any Lessee Landscape Beautification Operation and to promptly notify Company of any event, notice, claim, demand or litigation which involves or alleges contamination of the Premises, the groundwater thereunder or a discharge or release therefrom to adjacent property. Lessee agrees to waive any and all statutes of limitations applicable to any controversy or dispute arising out of this paragraph, and Lessee further agrees that it will not raise or plead a statute of limitations defense against Company in any action arising out of Lessee's failure to comply with this paragraph. Company, its agents, employees and authorized contractors shall have the right to enter the Premises or any part thereof, at all reasonable hours, for the purpose of inspecting the Premises to determine if Lessee is complying with all terms and conditions of this Lease and/or to determine through inspection and/or testing if any h ' azardous condition, pollution or contamination is present or threatened. Lessee agrees to cooperate with Company in any such inspection and to provide at Company's request any and all permits, reports, or records of any kind, relating to any materials used, stored, treated or disposed of on the Premises. Either party hereto shall have the right at any time to cancel this Lease by giving ten (10) days' notice in writing. At the expiration for the time limited by said notice, the Lessee shall promptly, and in the manner directed by Company, restore the Premises to the condition it was in prior to the leasing of same. Upon default of the Lessee to do so, the Company may accomplish the same and so restore the Premises, and the Lessee will promptly pay to the Company for the cost and expense of such restoration. In addition, at termination Lessee shall provide evidence, reasonably satisfactory to Company, that the condition vi of the Premises and all improvements thereon attributable to the 11 acts and/or omissions of Lessee during the term of this Lease comply with all applicable laws, regulations and standards. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed these presents on 19994 By: Title: (Municipal Seal) G:\LAW\C0NTRACT\C18161.004 By: Title: Municipal Clerk BY: Title: Resolution/Ordinance number It ATTACHMENT B (UNION PACIFIC PROPOSAL) EXHIB I T A SPECIFICATIONS Unless otherwise modified by Order of the Illinois Commerce Commission: No planting or other landscaping material shall be allowed within 16 feet of the edge of the nearest tie nor allowed to grow into this zone other than grass or ground cover, which will not grow in excess of three (3) feet in height, 2. Any planting or other landscape material done on the railroad right-of-way within 500 feet of any grade crossing shall be maintained so as not to exceed a height of three (3) feet. 3. Any grading or future planting done on Company's property must be approved in writing by Company's Engineering Department located at 500 West Madison, Suite 3610, Chicago, Illinois 60661. 4. Any work done on Company's property closer than 16 feet from the edge of the nearest tie will require a flagman provided by Company at Lessee's expense. 5 0 There is to be no interference with Company facilities, including pole lines, drainage structures and signal apparatus. 6 io� There is to be no adverse effect to visibility or drainage on Company property. 7. Lessee shall not construct or permit to be constructed any building, structure, excavation or any other obstruction without the written consent of Company's Engineering Department. 8. The Union Pacific Railroad Company will not, in any way, share in the cost of landscaping or for any improvements to the area covered by this lease. 9 The Union Pacific Railroad Company will not be responsible for any damage to the landscaping or improvements. G:\LAW\C0NTRACT\C18161.004 ATTACHMENT C (VILLAGE PROPOSAL 11/10/99) SPECIFICATIONS 1. No planting or other landscaping material, installed after the date this lease becomes effective, shall be allowed within 16 feet of the edge of the nearest tie nor allowed to grow into this zone other than grass or ground cover, which will not grow in excess of three (3) feet in height. Plantings installed prior to that date, except for grass or ground cover which will not grow in excess of three (3) feet in height, shall be maintained so that they do not grow any closer than 15' from the center ofthe outside rail. 2. Any p1miting or other landscape material, installed after the date this lease becomes effective, on the railroad right-of-way within 500 feet of any grade crossing shall be maintained so as not to exceed a height of three (3) feet above the adjacent ties. Plantings installed prior to that date which are growing within a prescribed sight triangle as defined below,, shall be maintained no higher than 3', except for decidious trees whose crowns shall be maintained no lower than 15' above the adjacent ties. The sight triangle shall be determined by connecting with straight lines the following three points: 1) a point intersected by the outside rail and the edge of pavement of the intersecting street, 2) a point measured 300 feet along the outside rail from point #1, and 3) a point where a pedestrian walking along the intersecting street would first step onto the railroad right-of-way. 3. Any grading or future planting done on Company's property must be approved in writing by Company's Engineering Department located at 500 West Madison,, Suite 3610, Chicago, Illinois 60661. 4. Except for routine landscape maintenance such as mowing, weeding, etc., any work done on Company's property closer than 16 feet from the edge of the nearest tie will require a flagman. The flagman will be provided by Company at Company's expense. 5. There is to be no interference with Company facilities, including pole lines, drainage structures and signal apparqtus. 1 6-0 There is to be no adverse effect to visibility or drainage on Company property. 7. Lessee shall not construct or permit to be constructed any building, structure, excavation or any other obstruction without the written consent of Company's Engineering Department. 8. The Union Pacific Railroad Company will not, in any way, share in the cost of landscaping or for any improvements to the area covered by this lease. 9. The Union Pacific Railroad Company will not be responsible for any damage -to the landscaping or improvements. 10. Plantings which were installed in the area 100' west of Main Street and 100' east of Emerson Street, as shown on the approved landscape plan, shall be maintained as per the ICC Exemption order dated April 10, 1985. X:FILES/FORESTRY/WORD/1999/IJP-ATTACH-42�.DOC VW1/ 11/11/99 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION LEASE BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT C BA,I1'LRQAQ...C-OM,PAN , WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is desirous of entering into a lease agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company for railroad right-of-way landscape beautification; and WHEREAS, such lease will allow the Village of Mount Prospect to plant and maintain vegetation on the Union Pacific right-of-way within the corporate limits of Mount Prospect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: S-ECTI QN'0 E,:', That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize execution of a Lease Agreement between Union Pacific Railroad Company and the Village of Mount Prospect for railroad right-of-way landscape beautification within the corporate boundaries of the Village, and said Lease shall be for a period of one (1) year and thereafter, unless terminated as hereinafter provided as set forth in the Lease, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit A. 5E,Q'I1QN'DL/Q-, , That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law, AYESA, An M 1700M QW PASSED and APPROVED this ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk HAGEN\fl1es\W1 N\R E S\LEAS E.tra in. ROWbea utification doc day of 11999. Gerald L. Farley Mayor N TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: FORESTRY /GROUNDS SUPERINTENDENT DATE: NOVEMBER 10,, 1999 SUBJECT: PROPOSED CODE MODIFICATIONS REGARDING UTILITY LINE CLEARANCE I request that the Village Board consider the attached modifications to our tree ordinances. These modifications are designed to limit possible additional negative impacts on Mount Prospect's trees due to utility line clearance activities. BACKGROUND Two events have occurred recently which, in my opinion, could result in even more aggressive line clearance pruning and a deterioration of public relations between the Village, Com Ed and our residents. These events include newly proposed state legislation and a major restructuring of forestry staff and policies at Commonwealth Edison. The legislation in question, SB 423, was sent to Governor Ryan in August. As originally written, the legislation preempted local ordinances that governed utility companies' line clearance activities. Under pressure from certain municipalities, Governor Ryan vetoed the legislation. However, he indicated that he would approve the legislation if wording was added which effectively "grandfathered in" any local ordinances enacted prior to January 1, 2000. Currently the General Assembly is scheduled to review the amendatory veto language later this month. The second event is Com Ed's recently announced merger with PECO Energy. As a result of this merger, Com Ed's top forester Paul Appelt, has been replaced by a forester from PECO. Many other high level personnel have transferred to other divisions or left Com Ed. The arboricultural consulting firms which directed and scheduled the line clearance crews (Doyen and Associates and Environmental Consultants, Inc.) may no longer be used by Com Ed. kdditionally, the previous line clearance contractor, Wright Tree Service, has been replaced with Asplundh Tree Experts. Our contacts in the industry have led us to believe that the "new" Com Ed is likely planning major cost cutting efforts that I feel will have a negative impact for us. Specifically, we have heard that they may discontinue their past practice of leaving 'informative door hangers at each address where work will be performed. Additionally, there is talk that tree trimming/removal decisions may be made by the foreman of each crew at the time of pruning, as opposed to their past practice of having an arboricultural consultant identify the proposed work ahead of time. I feel the door hangers were an important method of informing the public and a means of encouraging them to call Com Ed, not the Village, with questions and problems. Also, if the foreman will be making decisions at the time of pruning, I feel that our chances of getting Com Ed to prune selected trees less aggressively will be reduced even further. Additionally, it will be impossible to continue our past practices regarding tree removal/replacement. In the past, the arboricultural consultant has proposed removal/replacement in selected cases, we have reviewed these requests on a case-by-case basis, and then if we felt removal was warranted we normally gave the adj acent residents the opportunity to decide whether these trees would be pruned or removed. This practice has greatly reduced the amount of criticism the Village receives for Com Ed's activities. However, this whole process may take several weeks, so it would be impossible to continue in this manner if the foreman will be making on -the -spot decisions. I met recently with several municipal foresters who are seriously concerned about the above issues. Nearly everyone present felt that they should quickly enact new tree ordinances or beef up existing ordinances, to protect their municipality's interests. Fortunately in Mount Prospect, our ordinances have included a Utility Line Clearance section since 1997. Our ordinances recognize that utility companies are required to maintain their lines to insure public safety and service. However, they allow us to attempt to control the work to a certain extent,, in order to try to reduce the negative impacts on our tree population. In light of recent events, I feet that the attached code modifications should be made,, in order to help maintain the "status quo" should the legislation pass and/or Com Ed decide to take the rumored approach. PROPOSED CHANGES Attached is a copy of our existing ordinance, with proposed additions in bold type. In summary, these modifications will accomplish the following: 1. Allow us tolimit, th; f V�rLmgg , ubl" c ' ' own e u p i ly d oak trees., Currently our ordinances restrict pruning of publicly owned American elm trees to the dormant season in order to reduce the spread of Dutch Elm Disease. Com Ed has balked at this restriction, but followed it because it was in our ordinance. There also exists in Illinois a similar fatal disease of oak trees,, called Oak Wilt. Many plant pathologists recommend that where Oak Wilt is present, pruning of oaks should also be limited to the dormant season. We have not yet experienced Oak Wilt in Mount Prospect, so I have not yet felt it necessary to limit oak pruning activities in this way. However, because of the January 1, 2000 deadline for ordinance changes, I am proposing adding this restriction to our ordinances now, with the provis'lo-n that it may be waived by the Public Works Director. It would be my intention to impose this restriction only if and when Oak Wilt becomes a problem in Mount Prospect. 1 2. R=ut"',re a van. itt"en. ,no,ti",fi,,!ggionto ,.eg,,!gh,,rlroe . This would require notification as has been done voluntarily in the past, and eliminate the possibility of the utility company claiming -that a single newspaper notice would be sufficient. u,re that. a, ceftifiedor g,.rb,on, t & re S --l", I U —e- foreste, emplgyed by the,, utflitv ............. in -s -,tr n *ae edo,n,p,,,,ub i andt) i e trees. nge,,pf',crews, and detem, 2 n o� the egent Qf'work need r"vat This measure will ensure that the person planning the work will bring a minimum standard of arboricultural knowledge and experience to bear on decisions that will seriously impact both public and private trees in Mount Prospect. I request that the Village Board consider these proposed modifications at the Board meeting scheduled for November 16, 1999. Public Works Director Glen Andler and I will be present to answer any questions. *N......Yandy, Clark concur: Glen"%j' R. A—ndle�' Public Works Director &MM INIEW 0 ORDINANCE NO,, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V *F CHAPTER 9 (STREETS AND SIDEWALKS) BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: ECTJ-Q-N Paragraph F of Section 9.509, entifled' "Pruning of''Trees", of Chapter 9 of the Mount Prospeot Village Code shall be amended by, deletilig Paragraph F entirely and in lieu thereof the, following, new paragraph, so th, at hereafter said Sec -tion, 9.509. F shall be and read a,SJ6flo5ws:-, 11F. Pruning American Elm Or Oak Trees: To help prevent the spread of Dutch elm disease and Oak Wilt, American elm or oak trees on public property shall not be pruned during the growing season, except when, in the opinion of the Director of Public Works, pruning is required to alleviate an imminent hazard. Other exemptions from this requirement may be granted as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. Fl & T at Paragraph H of Section 9,509 entitled "Pruning of Trees" of Chapter 9 of the Mount Proispect" Village Code shall be amended by deleting Paragraph H entirely and ins,erting Jin, lieu ther�eof the following n�ew parag,raph, so that hereafter said Section 9.509.H shall be and read as, .fol lo "H. Utility Line Clearance Pruning: The Village recognizes the needto maintain utility lines with regard to public safety and service. The Village also recognizes the benefits, provided by, healthy public trees. In the cases where public trees occupy space under or adjacent to overhead utility lines, the need to maintain utilit ' y line clearance will be ba,lanced with the need to, rnaintatn healthy, trees by Using proper, arborICUItUral., pruning techniques to obtain the required clearance. Topping is not a proper arboricultural pruning technique and shall not be used in utility line clearance of public trees in the Village. With the exception of emergency line clearance operations, companies or organizations owning utility lines in the Village, or their line clearance contractors, are required to notify the Director of Public Works of scheduled public property pruning locations at least seven (7) days prior to but no more than 90 days before, the commencement of pruning operations. When necessary, as determined by the Director of Public Works, a representative of the utility company, who shall be an arborist certified by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) or a degreed forester, will be required to meet with the Director of Public Works to evaluate the impact of pruning on I 1144 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO* VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS rr to �' FROM: DEPUTY FINANCE DIRECTOR, CAROL WIDMERQ)j\j SUBJECT: OUTSOURCING OF PRINTING OF VEHICLE APPLICATION FORMS DATE: NOVEMBER 9,1999 PURPOSE To discuss a recommendation to outsource the printing and mailing of vehicle license application forms. _jX t 1 0 i , a A 1 C 81 The Village's current method of printing and mailing vehicle license application forms is very labor intensive. Almost the entire month of January is reserved for the printing, bursting, stuffing, sorting, counting, sealing and preparing the paper work to meet the requirements of the post office. The printer we are now using to print the applications is not Year 2000 compliant and a change in the type of form we are using will have to take place. A portion of the process; namely the stuffing of the forms, has been outsourced for many years but that individual is no longer willing to perform that service. Therefore, a search would have to take place to find someone else to perform that function. The Village currently pays $305 in postage to mail each application form and we do not have the software to capture the $.243 rate available through some of the professional firms specializing in these types of mailings. As I mentioned above,, the vehicle license mailing is a very labor-intensive process. For instance, one part-time clerk devotes almost the entire month of January to sealing, counting, and preparing the applications for mailing. A great many of the forms are returned to us each year because residents move out of town and we have no way of knowing they have moved. The cost to outsource the process is almost the same as the current cost to prepare the applications in-house. The Village purchases approximately $4,000 worth of forms and envelopes each year and personnel costs, including $4,500 for just the stuffing of the applications, add an additional $6,000 to the cost bringing the total r $10,000. Outsourcing will free up a block of time in January which will enable the Customer Service Division to process business license applications on a more timely basis and permit them to prepare business license follow-up notices in January instead of February as is usually the norm. On October 18, 1999 a request for quotation was sent to four firms who provide vehicle application billing services. The RFP requested a quote for a three-year period. Three firms responded by the requested due date. A summary of those responses for the three years is provided below: AP Standard Kegister Standard Register was unable to provide a complete proposal. In addition to only being able to provide one municipal client reference, they did not provide samples of forms and they were unable to give a firm quote on programming costs. The known costs include $12,,123.20 for forms, printing, folding, stuffing and mal*lm*g, plus a one- time set up fee of $170. Postage at $.271 cents would be an additional $10,298. They indicated that for years two and three the possible increase would not exceed 5% per year. The cost for a three- year contract excluding postage and assuming a 5% increase each year would be $38,388.39. D 10, weet Rest)onse Direct Response has an extensive list of municipal clients. The sample form provided by Direct Response is very similar to the one currently used by the Village. It does include animals on the same form. Direct Response utilizes the National Change of Address (NCOA.) service that helps assure the Village that our mailing list is comprised of people who currently reside within the Village. The total cost of the mailing as proposed by Direct Response is $9,790.20. The Village would also Set -Up Fees Year I Year 2 Year 3 Total Standard Register $ 170,00 $129123,20 $129729.36 $13,365,83 $38,388-39 Direct Response $ 500,00 . ............................ - — ----- . ..... . . ........ $99790.20 $99790.20 $99790,20 $299870.60 Third Millennium $29385.00 $109944.00 $119272.32 $119610.49 $369211.81 AP Standard Kegister Standard Register was unable to provide a complete proposal. In addition to only being able to provide one municipal client reference, they did not provide samples of forms and they were unable to give a firm quote on programming costs. The known costs include $12,,123.20 for forms, printing, folding, stuffing and mal*lm*g, plus a one- time set up fee of $170. Postage at $.271 cents would be an additional $10,298. They indicated that for years two and three the possible increase would not exceed 5% per year. The cost for a three- year contract excluding postage and assuming a 5% increase each year would be $38,388.39. D 10, weet Rest)onse Direct Response has an extensive list of municipal clients. The sample form provided by Direct Response is very similar to the one currently used by the Village. It does include animals on the same form. Direct Response utilizes the National Change of Address (NCOA.) service that helps assure the Village that our mailing list is comprised of people who currently reside within the Village. The total cost of the mailing as proposed by Direct Response is $9,790.20. The Village would also have to pay a one-time $500 fee for artwork and proofs. Postage would be at $ .243 cents or $9,234. Direct Response will not institute a price increase for the three-year period of the contract. Thecost of services for the three-year contract would be $29,870.60 excluding postage. Third Millennium Third Millennium also has an extensive list of municipal clients and they also utilize the NCOA service described above. The total first year cost to the Village would be $10,944 plus a set-up fee of $2,385. The proposAl stated that increases in years two and three of the contract would be dependent upon any increases in paper costs and the CPI so I factored in a 3% increase for the subsequent years. The totA l cost for the three years would be $3 6,211.8 1. Recommendation Based on the information provided above, I recommend that the Village enter into a contract with Direct Response Resource for a three-year period. This contract will allow the Village to direct staff resources away from routine tasks such as stuffing and sealing envelopes and concentrate on the areas that need more staff attention. The Proposed 2000 Budizet vrovides funds for the outsourcing of the vehicle application fonns. It is necessary to seek Village Board concurrence now, however, due to the need to order application forms and allow enough time for a smooth And timely transition to outsourcing. 0 IRM Ms. Carol Widmer Deputy Finance Director Village of Mt. Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Mt. Prospect, EL 60056 3014 Commercial Aventi Northbrook, Illinois 60062-1911 phone 847.498.3999" 1 fax 84 7.498.40,19 -Alt e-mail drrmailitoaol.col The following information is a proposal based on Ile Direct Response Resource, Inc. (DRR) managing the prograr r r r0 g, printing and mailing portion of your Vehicle Sticker Application project. At DRR we provide our clients with the option of outsourcing the design, printing, data processing, personalization and mailing service portion of their vit. mailed busine#rrrr ra ations. DRR is brokers in the industry and are specialists in consultation and production, resulting in creative managed solutions with the outstandin attention given to quality, detaiL accuracy and efficiency. DRR was established in 1992 and five employees make up the size of the company. The attached information is in regard to an innovative mailing package idea I have developed for Vehicle Sticker Applications. The production and distribution of vehicle sticker applications is our expertise. We feel that we have the best offering in the market place, which is evident by our long list of satisfied customers. benefits of the Vehicle Sticker Application ma package idea includes: * Eliminates the need to provide personnel to process the job. * The time to provide sticker fu1 Ilment is streamlined. * Reduces Postal costs. act printed documents offers your customer a clean legible copy. * No special progra * g is needed on * Fewer customer inquiries/complaints your end. We have the capability of due to specially designed documents. converting your data in its current format. * Custo ed Reporting will help improve the accuracy of your mailing file. Merge multiple vehicles owned by a an individual onto one application form. saving hundreds of dollars in postage and production. Consultations Personalized Mailings s Direct Marketing * Production Services T�-p nirort PP-znnnqP Rpzniirr-a 'r,(- inPPI Ms. Carol Widmer October 29, 1999 Page -2- Example of satisfied Customers include: Arlington Heights 5 yrs. Bartlett (3 Yrs. Elgin yr. Elmwood Park 4 Yrs. Flossmoor 2 yrs. Glen Ellyn 3 yrs. Glenview 3 yrs. • Lake Forest ( I yr. ) • Lake in the Hills ( I yr. • Libertyville ( 5 yrs. Morton Grove ( 5 yrs. Oak Park ( 2 yrs. River Forest ( 4 yrs. Streamwood ( 3 yrs. Winnetka ( 2 Yrs. Wood Dale ( _3' Yrs. All of the above villages have been satisfied with our service in the past. Listed below are contacts for just a few of these villages. Please feel free to contact anyone of the above. References Village of Bartlett Village of Libertyville Village of Winnetka Ms. Linda Gallien Mr. Steven Noble Mx. Ed McKee Village Clerk Finance Director Finance Director ( 630 ) 837 - 0800 ( 847 ) 918 - 2102 ( 847 ) 501 - 6000 Proposed Project Specifications Two Product Alternatives This state-of-the-art idea provides the flexibility of merging multiple vehicles (mals onto one document, OCR scan line and / or barcode capabilities, follow-ups and most imp ortantly ana,"Amised �&k The purp o se of this envelop e is to make it very easy for the village to return the stickers to its residents. The sticker return envelope comes in either a removable tape or remoist glue envelope seal method. .......................... .............. ........ Elm. This traditional mailing package provides the village with the option of sending to its residents two applications or one application with a personalized letter. This method also includes the flexibility of merging multiple vehicles / animals onto one document, OCR scan line and / or barcode capabilities and follow-ups. Either method can be custont designed to meet the village `s needs. Ms. Carol Widmer "fictober 291 1999 - Page Data Processing - Convert input from tape or diskette formatted in a fixed block and record length. - Set up at 6 lines per inch laser printed Application Form - Merge multiple vehicles onto one document with animal record information. - Pass file through quality control program - Produce reports. - NCOA service. - Postal sort first class zip + 4 prebarcode. Personalization - Laser print a continuous document. Lettershop - Trim and burst document. - Insert into a 6" x 9 1/2" window envelope with a 8 3/4" x 5 3/4" reply envelope. - Seal, meter and mail at a Ist class zip + 4 prebarcoded rate ( $ .243 ). Reports - Customer input file dump report of each output field. - Amount billed by vehicle type. - Records retained, input and state DMV file ( if applicable - NCOA address chanaed. - Resident move -out report. - Current resident address report. - Quantity breakdowns. - Postal breakdown. - Input file detail report. - Mailing file detail report. - Any other report suggested by customer. Data Capture Services - DRR also offers a fidl range of record update and data management services. This proposal does not include these services but they can be quoted upon request. Ms. Carol Widmer October 29. 1999 Page -4- All DRR vendor software has been upgraded and tested and is Y2K compliant. Cost ( DRR is proud to present two product alternatives, prices are good for three years ) Artwork /Proofs (One time charge for either method) Cost - $500.00 D= -'dpfim -Qwntlity-'nct Extension Arlington Heights Method 10 Printing, Programming, 301000 $ .4 13 $ 121)390.00 Processing, Imaging, Reporting and Lettershop Mail drop Feb. 12000 Deduct, or remoist glue instead of removable tape on sticker return envelope: - $ 2,200 Non - respondent mailing 5,000 $.525 $49200.00 Mail drop summer 2000 Deduct for remoist glue instead of removable tape on sticker return envelope: - $ 1,000 Glen Ellyn Method Printing, Progr-amming, Processing, Imaging, Reporting and lettershop Mail drop Feb. 12000 Non - respondent mailing Mail drop in summer 8 1/210 x I V or 8 1/2" x 14" Document At .30 13000 $.25o Ms. Carol Widmer October 291 1999 Postage 99% of your file should qualify at a 1st class zip + 4 prebarcoded rate ( $ .243 ). All applications will be delivered to the Mt. Prospect post office or to the closest post office tjo, the village hall that has a bulk mail department. Walk Up Applications 500 @ $ 44.75/m. 105000 @ $ 29.02/m 15 1 0 0 0 @ $84/m Terms and Conditions * Acceptance of this proposal serves as a binding contract. * All vehicle sticker application design ideas by DRR ( copywrite 1996 ) are protected. * All shipping costs, print overs and walk up forms will be billed as a separate item * Costs are based on quantities listed. Variances if more than 10% above the highest 10% below the lowest quantity will cause prices to be adjusted accordingly. * Postage funds are due seven days prior to your mailing date and should be made payabl to: The Direct Response Resource, Inc.. i * Any postage not used will. be indicated on your job hivoice along with the applicable supporting postal receipts and will be credited. * We will require full payment of all services in 30 days from mail date. * The above costs is based on DRR receiving a raw data tape, C.D. or diskette M' fixed block record length format. Additional programming costs will apply if file is not received in this format. DRR has E-mail and transmission capabilities, but we suggest that you provide the file on magnetic media due to the possible large size of the file. * The above costs are inclusive of all the services necessary to produce, process and mail your documents, with exception of postage, print overs, walk-up forms and deliveries. * The above costs are good for 120 days and could be locked in with a signed purchase 1rder. Once 1rices are locked in the price and agreement is crood f1r a three year period. Ms. Carol Widmer October 29, 1999 Page -6- 0 Planning Time Schedule Act C�1511p- DMIM"', 1. Forms Design Nov. 17 DRR / Village 2. Stock Proofs Available Nov. 24 DRR 3. Stock Order is Placed Nov. 29 DRR 4. Stock In House Dec. 20 DRR 5. Live Data Received Dec. 30 Village 6. Live Sign -Offs with Back Up Reports Jan. 13 DRR 7. Production Begm's Jan. 17 DRR 8. Postage Due Jan. 24 Village 9. Mail Date Feb. I DRR Slal.cer"ely, Derek Singleton, D SO *bt