Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0917_001Next Ordinance No. 5043 Next Resolution No. 41-99 ORDER OF BUSINESS REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Mount Prospect Senior Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 offixel a RIO ;Ikq VEILMAW. LOWE Village Clerk ALL Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday September 7, 1999 7:30 P.M. Ill. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley TrusteeTimothy Corcoran Trustee Daniel Nocchl Trustee Paul Hoefert. Trustee Milchaelle Skowron Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks IV. INVOCATION: Mayor Farley V111. MAYOR'S REPORT A. A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO NORB HUECKER FOR SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY (Exhibit A) ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 8471392-60001 TDD 8471392-6064. B. 16'reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE '11 -his ordinance amends Chapter 13 (Alcoholic Liquors) of the Village Code by deleting one Class "R" liquor license for Sun's Chinese Restaurant, 1747-49 West Algonquin Road. The restaurant was sold more than 30 days ago, and no new liquor license has been issued; in accordance with Section 13.108 of the Village Code the previous license is no longer va(Exhibit B) 0 PAA � P1 "0 ua=l Ix. OLD BUSINESS A. Approval of reduction in surface parking spaces at the Clocktower Place Condominium development (This Item will be deferred to the Village Board meeting of September 21, 1999) X. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 25-99, 407 N. Fairview Avenue The petitioner is requesting a Conditional Use to allow construction of a front porch within twenty-five feet (25') of the front property line. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. B. ZBA 27-99, Text Amendment The proposed text amendments will allow day care centers as a Conditional Use in B-3, B-4, and B-5 zoning districts. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a vote of 5-0. C. Safety Commission recommendations: 1. Request for approval of the new Safety Commission policy of reviewing traffic -related issues; the Safety Commission recommends approval by a vote of 7-0. 2. Request for No Parking Any Time and No Passing on Shoulder signs along the west side of Mount Prospect Road between Central Road and Northwest Highway; the Safety Commission recommends approval by a vote of 6-0. 3. Request for No Stopping, Standing, Parking on School Days 8 a. m.44 p.m. signs along the south side of Council Trail between Emerson Street and Elm Street, and between School Street and William Street; the Safety Commission recommends approval by a vote of 6-0. 4. Request for Stop signs at the intersection of Wille Street and Shabonee Trail, and for 2 -way Yield signs on Wille Street at Shabonee Trail; by votes of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends denial of Stop, signs at Wille Street and Shabonee Trail, and approval of 2 -way Yield signs on Wille Street at Shabonee Trail. . Request for Stop .signs at the intersection of Forest Avenue and Bob -O -Link Road; the Safety Commission recommends denial by a vote of 5-0. 6 Request for Stop signs at the intersection of Forest Avenue and Albion Lane; the Safety Commission recommends denial by a vote of 5-O. D. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO ENTER INTO AN AUTOMATIC FIRE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT WITH THE VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS This resolution authorizes the Village to eater into an agreement with Arlington Heights, for automatic fire mutual aid. (Exhibit C) E. 1$' reading of AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (TRIANGLE AT RAND AND CAMP MCDONALD ROADS) (Exhibit D) FA RESOLUTION ST BLISHING A FUND BALANCE/RESERVE POLICYExhi " � bit E) Iv VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT A. Accept proposal for 1999 Cured -In -Place (CIP) Sewer Repair contract E. Accept proposal for Mount Prospect Newsletter contract C. Status Report I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AUGUST 17, 1999 CALL CALL TO ORDER TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. ROLL CALL ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Irvana Wilks Absent: Trustee Daniel Nocchi PLEDGE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Trustee Wilks. INVOCATION INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Lohrstorfer. MINUTES APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held August 3, 1999. Upon roll cal[-, Ayes: Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks, Corcoran, Lohrstorfer Nays: None Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS BILLS Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ 780,152 Refuse Disposal Fund 2,930 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 59,846 Community Development Block Grant Fund 7,770 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Fund '97 Debt Service Fund 300 1998A Street Improvement Const. Fund Capital Improvement Fund Police & Fire Building Construction Capital Improvement Construction Fund Downtown Redevelopment Const. Fund 850,551 Street Improvement Construction Fund 358,141 1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 40 Flood Control Construction Fund 153s314 Water & Sewer Fund 135,018 Parking System Revenue Fund 9,528 Vehicle Maintenance Fund 44911 Vehicle Replacement Fund 3,435 Computer Replacement Fund Risk Management Fund 294,419 Police Pension Fund Fire Pension Fund Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund 13,842 Benefit Trust Funds $2l668v214 Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Corcoran, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. FINANCIAL FINANCIAL REPORT REPORT Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of the financial report for January 1, 1999 -July 31, 1999, subject to audit. 0 Upon roll call -,0 Ayes-, Hoefert, Corcoran, Skowron, Wilks, Lohrstorfer Nays: None Motion carried. MAYOWS REPORT tiation for Pastor Robert J. Furreboe, MAYOR'S Mayor Farley read a resolution of appre , REPORT: Of St.., Mark, Lutheran Church, who is ending his ministry with that congregation. RES. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron moved for approval of NO. 38-99 NO. No. 38-99: PASTOR R.J. A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR THE LEADERSHIP PROVIDED BY PASTOR ROBERT J. FURREBE O FURREBOE Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Corcoran, Skowron, Wilks, Lohrstorfer Nays: None Motion carried. SCHOOLOS A proc4amation was presented to Mount Prospect Police Sgt. Jim Edwards, OPEN SAFETY Proclairnln'g the week of August 23-29,1999 as "School"s Open Safety WEEK Week." 0 0 0 ANAli �uh gesW thathe attend', tho nelxt, C,offe�ewith Council Trustee Corcormsug 0, f re Imirtiodlatd answers•to his meeting as h e would be rnore� likely,to, celve, con,cernsfrom, department heaft in 49tendance., � ..... . . . . . . . ...... Page 2 — August 17, 1999 that they posel no thre'at to the safety of pedJestrians. Mr. MacBride, als *0 expressed his displeasure with patrortsof Mrs. P� and Me Restaurant, b allegedly d�r nking ale I oholic, everages outside "the, restaurant.) OLD BUSINESS ZBA 18-99 ZBA 18-99, 105 E. Prospect Avenue 105 E. An ordinance was presented for second reading granting a Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development and Variation for the creation of five PROSPECT AVENUE townhomes at 105 E. Prospect Avenue. ORD, Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of 0 NO. 5037 Ordinance No. 5037; AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 105 EAST PROSPECT AVENUE Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried, ZBA 19-99 ' ZBA 19-99, 310 S. WaPella Avenue 310S. An ordinance was presented for first reading requesting a Conditional Use WAPELLA permit for the construction of a covered front porch encroaching five -feet Into AVE. the required front yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended approval by a vote of 4-0. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron Nays: Wilks Motion carried,, ORD. Trustee Hoefert,, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for the approval of NO. 5038 O,rd',,I'nance No. 5013.8., AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY KNOWN AS 310 SOUTH WAPELLA AVENUE Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks ZBA 20-99 Nays: None 2400 Motion carried. TERMINAL DR. ZBA 20-999 2400 Terminal Drive An ordinance was presented for first reading requesting a Conditional Use permit fbr the establishment of a cartage facility, with accessory officeanid warehousing us,es In the existing buildings. The Zoning Board of Appe'als had recommended approval of the request by a vote of 4-0. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks ORD. Nays: None NO. 5039 Motion carried. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for the approval of Ordinance No. 5039: AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2400 TERMINAL DRIVE Page 3 -- August 17, 1999 Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. LSA 21-99 ZETA 21-99,1401 Feehanville [give 1401 An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would grant a Conditional FEEHAN11ILLE Use permit to allow the establishment of a trade/vocational school in the DRIVE Kensington Business bark. The ;honing Board of Appeals had recommended approval of the request by a vote of 4-0. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried, ORD. O 5040 Ordinance No. 5040: AN ORDINANCE ir MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT MIII • rGRANTING • A A CONDITIONAL ANDVARIATION PROPERTY III Iw M EAST RAND .*,r Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays:, None Motion carried. A resolution was presented which would authorize the Village to enter into an NORWOOD agreement with Norwood Construction, Inc. for the downtown redevelopment REDEV. of Phase 1 B, which is located on the northeast corner of Northwest Highway ACRMT. and Route 83. Page 4 August 17, 1999 Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: bone Motion carried. ?ESA 22-9 ZBA 22-991 408 E. Rand Road 408 E. RANCH An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would rezone the subject ROAD property, and would grant a Conditional Use permit and a Variation to permit the establishment of a stand-alone parking lot to accommodate overflow parking at the existing funeral hone. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to waive th6 rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks I Nays: None Motion carried. CRC. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for approval of No. 5941 ordinance No. 5041: AN ORDINANCE ir MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT MIII • rGRANTING • A A CONDITIONAL ANDVARIATION PROPERTY III Iw M EAST RAND .*,r Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays:, None Motion carried. A resolution was presented which would authorize the Village to enter into an NORWOOD agreement with Norwood Construction, Inc. for the downtown redevelopment REDEV. of Phase 1 B, which is located on the northeast corner of Northwest Highway ACRMT. and Route 83. Page 4 August 17, 1999 RES. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for approval of NO. 39-99 Resolution No. 39-99: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF" AN,, AGREEMENT EE "H VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND N CONSTRUCTION', INC. FORTHE DOWNTOWNREDEVELOPMENT OF PHASE' I B ill LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND ROUTE 83, Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. NORWOOD A, resolution was presented, which would authorize the Village to enter Into an OPTION agreement, with Norwood, Construction, Inc. granting Norwood the option to AGRMT. I purchase'VII'lage-owe ed property at 117 South in Street. RES. Trustee Corcoran,4 seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of NO. 40-99 Resolution No -040-99: A RESOLUTIONAUTMORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN OPTION AGREEMENT BETWEENTHE VILLAGE, OF MOUNT PROSPECTAND NORWOOD CONSTRUCTION,, INC. FOR THE OPTION TO PURCHASE CERTAIN VILLAGE PROPERTY ATI 17 SOUT'l-I MAIN STR,EET Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Iskowrion Nays: Wilks, Motion carried. REAL ESTATE An ordinance was presented for second reading, which would authorize the PURCHASE: Village to enter into a real estate purchase agreement to purchase vacant 216S. property at 216.. Emerson Street. EMERSON ST,, Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of ORD. Ordinance No, 5042-, NO. 5042 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL, ESTATE PURCHASE, AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY IN THE VILLAGE AT 216 SOUTH EMERSON STREET Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried, It'll, His Page 6 -- August 17, 1999 MANAGER'S VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT REPORT Mr. Janonls had no Information to present to the Board. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Janonis, responding to an Inquiry from Trustee Skowron, stated that the Old General Mare will be relocated within the next two weeks. Trustee Wilks suggested that the transporting of the building be videotaped by the Village's MPTV staff; Mr. Janonis responded that this has already been planned. CLOSED CLOSED SESSION .SESSION Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to convene a Closed Session for the purpose of discussing Land Acquisition, as cited under b ILCS 12012 (c) (5). Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: Corcoran Motion carried. Page August 17, 1999 Following an in-depth discussion among the Board, Mr. Lee and Mr. Duerr, it was decided that the discussion should be deferred to the September 7 Village Board meeting, allowing Norwood and the Association an opportunity to reach an agreement regarding the parking spaces. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to defer the discussion of the elimination of eight parking spaces at the Shires of Clocktower, to the September 7, 1999 Village Board meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. A request was presented to ratify the recent reimbursement of $13,488, to RATIFY Norwood Construction, Inc. for the demolition of two single-family homes PAYMENT TO located at 13 and 1 S. Wille ,Street by Albrecht enterprises, as part of the NCRWCCD downtown redevelopment project. The Phase 1A Redevelopment Agreement between the Village and Norwood contains a provision that allows the Village to permit Norwood to undertake work on behalf of the Village and to reimburse them for the work once it is complete. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to approve the reimbursement of $13,488 to Norwood Construction, Inc. for the demolition of residential structures at 13 and 15S. Wille Street. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. COLLECTIVE Arequest Was presented to ratify the approval of a tentative collective BARGAINING bargaining agreement between the Village's Public works Department and AGRMT: SEIU, Local 73. PUBLIC CS Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to approve the collective bargaining agreement between the Village and SEIU, Local 73 for th period of May 1 , 1999 to April 301 2002. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nuys: None Motion carried. MANAGER'S VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT REPORT Mr. Janonls had no Information to present to the Board. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Janonis, responding to an Inquiry from Trustee Skowron, stated that the Old General Mare will be relocated within the next two weeks. Trustee Wilks suggested that the transporting of the building be videotaped by the Village's MPTV staff; Mr. Janonis responded that this has already been planned. CLOSED CLOSED SESSION .SESSION Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to convene a Closed Session for the purpose of discussing Land Acquisition, as cited under b ILCS 12012 (c) (5). Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron, Wilks Nays: Corcoran Motion carried. Page August 17, 1999 RECONVENE RECONVENE The Board reconvened at 9:45 p.m. Mayor Farley summarized a meeting held earlier in the day with Randhurst Shopping Genter representatives. He stated that there was a different hierarchy of decision -makers at Rouse Corporation, which were in attendance at the meeting. He indicated that he woul'd'make additional information available as events occur. ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to adjourn the meeting., Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Lohrstorfer, Hoefert, Skowron, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:51 p.m. Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk Page 7 — August 17, 1999 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION August 31, 1999 rust &...Acgncv Fund Police Pension Fund Cash & lnvstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt 30,132,856 Balance 08/13/99 Per Attached Credits/ Balance 16,688 08/13/99 08/31/99 List of Bills Debits 08/31/99 General Fund 61406,164 5720276 760,550 (281,155) 51936,735 118,572 $909093233 1,332,211 1j8621177 0 89x573267 Refuse Disposal Fund 949,480 78,875 115109 ° ('1, 346) 911,916 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 3781957 110,262 149t771 339,448 Community Development Blk Grant Fund 61995 381731 1 51213 30,513 Local Law Enfrcmt Blk Grant Fd 1997 12,542 12,542 Local Law Enfrcmt Blk Grant Fd 1996 681 681 Debt Service Funds 21981,993 12,417 219941410 Capital Projects Funds 1998A Street Improvement Const Fund 401,308 (401, 308) Capital Improvement Fund 115360791 66,720 50,000 11520,071 Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 51,610 51,610 Capital Improvement Construction Fund 11201 11201 Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 1,237, 507 26,184 (50, 000) 11161,323 Street Improvement Construction Fund 31001,703 63,736 401, 308 3,466, 747 1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 41504 41504 Flood Control Construction Fund 8259441 33,585 791,856 Enter rriaQ Eu nds Water & Sewer Fund 29812,416 296,118 381,888 (101,156) 29625,490 Parking System Revenue Fund 670,838 81250 700 (61517) 671,871 Internal s rvlce Funds Vehicle Maintenance Fund 1369453 91 33,319 82,302 165,527 Vehicle Replacement Fund 4,523,688 91,210 4,6149898 Computer Replacement Fund 2080792 754 9,454 217,492 Risk Management Fund 2t983,945 10,743 11,404 207,208 31190,492 rust &...Acgncv Fund Police Pension Fund 29,3571131 40,569 112,267 29,285,433 Fire Pension Fund 30,132,856 33,957 108,938 30, 057,875 Flexcomp Trust Fund (5,048) 16,688 21584 91055 Escrow Deposit Fund '1,353,886 49,498 30,380 1,373,404 Benefit Trust Funds 121o399 21827 118,572 $909093233 1,332,211 1j8621177 0 89x573267 List of Bills Presented to the Board of "trustees AUGUST 31, 1-0/99 P.A G E DESCRIPTIONVENDOR NON-DEPARTNIENTAL EVA �3RYNJELSEN FINAL WATER BILL 3.23 FINAL EATER BILL 0.34 3.57 CHRISTOPHER CLARK, FINAL WATER BILL 22.61 F 3 NAL WATER BILL 2.38 24.99 DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT P/R 8/26/99 549,948.71 P/R 8/26/99 21775.52 P/R 8/26/99 492.45 P/R 8/26/99 41, 981.53 P/R 8/26/99 641.15 P/R 8/26/99 17 062.95 RETIREE INSTALL 8/31/99 1,641.95 RETIREE INSTALL 8/31/99 2,826.60 RETIREE INSTALL, 8/31/99 6 352.73 623,723.59 L I D I A FAB JANOW I C Z REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT 63.00 FIRST COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYEE DENTAL PLAN 21584.52 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO SAVINGS BONDS - P/R. 8/12/99 500.00 EMPLOYER SHARE E I CA. COSTS 8/26/99 18,393.34 EMPLOYER. SHARE FICA COSTS 8/26/99 207.63. EMPLOYER SHARE FICA COSTS 8/26/99 37.15 EMPLOYER. SHARE E I CA COSTS 8/26/99 31154.84 EMPLOYER. SHARE 4 F I CA. COSTS 8/26/99 48.64 EMPLOYER SHARE FICA COSTS 8/26/99 NO 274.40 23,115.98 SAVINGS BONDS - P/R 8/26/99 550.00 G.F. PIZZA REFUND FINAL NATER. BILL 30.72 REFUND FINAL WATER. BILL 3.22 33.94 PRAVEEN GANTARAM REFUND -PURCHASED IN ERROR 36.00 JOAN HAZEN OVERPAYMENT OF SENIOR. RATE 24.00 JANE HECK I N S REFUND FOR HOME DELIVERED MEALS 3.00 IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE PREMIUM FOR 8/99 252.00 WILLIAM KA AVIDAS REFUND $24.00 FOR SENIOR RATE 24.00 ALICE KOBUS REFUND FINAL WATER BILL 6.46 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL '0.68 7.14 KOOK CHAN KIM REFUND FINAL WATER. BILL 3.93 REFUND FINAL WATER. BILL 0.3s 4 .28 URO AUTO MALL RECOVERY FOR LEOANRD CA.DD I LLAC BAN 239.69 OAKTON PAVILLION HEALTHCARE 577 HOME DELIVERED MEALS 11442.50 PENSION DISBURSEMENTS POLICE PENSION DISE 8/31/99 111,793.19 FIRE PENSION DISB 8/31./99 108, 937.60 POLICE PENSION DISB 8/31/99 KRANZ 474.11 221, 204.90 POSTMASTER POSTAGE STAMP'S 330.00 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 2 R DESCRIPTION 701"Ilk Cmev ■ • VITELIO RODRIGUEZ DISTRICTSTATE OF ILLINOIS THIRD �� VILLAGE PROSPECT PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFF, 110E ffil'aw 4" hirl 6, , He I I - OVERPAYMENT , SENIOR RATE LIQUOR APPLICANT RECORD CHECK AUG3 BOND MONEY A J BOND MONEY AUG5 BOND AUG. BOND REFUND R/E STAMP #18683 DUPLICATE TRANSFER OF DRUG ACCOUNT FUNDS DISBURESEMENTS DISBURESEMENTS DISBURESEMENTS REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE DINNER TICKETS REFUND FINAL WATER BILL REFUND FINAL WATER BILL RENTAL OF FOREST VIEW FOR CWC t Ir j RE BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447' # J J BILL 108803 150030001447 MISC EXPENSES -CANDY MONEY 9.5 1.02 10.71 1.02 9 . G9 1 . 0 to 10.71 24.00 38.00 5,0161.00 3,159.00 114"�y25.00 V 2 /5.00 121720.00 651.00 �++� 1 r 0 0 0 . 0 0 81284.00 300.00 100.00 9168.0.00 30.00 47.43 22,61 2.38 24.99 mammamom". 417.47 AA SWIFT PRINT, INC. SEPT/OCT 1999 NEWSLETTER. 51923.20 BROWN'S CHICKEN PICNIC FOOD 11143.75 CHICAGO DEFENDER. PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT 265.31 CHICAGO TRIBUNE ADS 570.00 List of Bills Presented " Board of • w AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE ` ` 0 ADS 750.00 ADS 720.00 21040.00 DIGER, INC INTERNET SERVICE 11376.65 FUJITSU BUSINESS COMM. SYSTEMS 3RD QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE 142.97 LA RAZA NEWSPAPER PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT 288.00 MICROSOFT TECHNET-CORP. TECH NET 1 -YR SUBSCRIPTION RENEWA 319.00 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR JUDY 99 215.01 O' HARE REPORTING SERVICE COURT REPORTER. APPEARANCE FEE 104.50 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 72.37 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 154.48 226.85 OTTOSEN TR.EVAR.THEN BRITZ LEGAL FEES - INV 10478 & 10479 11127.00 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS, INC. AD -EXAM FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC 132.06 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 1'4.43 POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR. NEWSLETTER 21804.97 REACT COMPUTER. SERVICES, INC NETWORK MAINT.CONTRACT 399.00 DAVID STRAHL TRAVEL ADVANCE 469.05 VON BRIESEN,PURTELL&ROPER,S.C. SERVICES 51289.80 TOTAL: 22,281.56 TV SERVICES DIVISION JUDY B. BUNDICK PARADE SUPPLIES & BATTERIES 111.35 PARADE SUPPLIES & BATTERIES 30.00 141.35 BUSINESS ENVELOPES ENVELOPES 65.83 FUJITSU BUSINESS COMM. SYSTEMS 3RD QTR. MAINT/SOFTWARE 255.30 MAILBOXES ETC. SHIPMENT OF VIDEO TAPES 57.75 SHIPPING CHARGES 56.35 114.11 MAR.KERTEK VIDEO SUPPLY 2 SPACE CAPTIVATOR SHELF 55.79 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN OFFICE SUPP 250.89 OFFICE SUPP 80.98 33..87 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 144.74 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001.447' 308.95 453.70° PETTY CASE - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 32.94 THE TAPE COMPANY MINI -DV VIDEOCASSETTE 931.71 CONSUMER MINI DV TAPE 257.49 1,18 .20 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE 74.75 TOTAL: 21714.84 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 4 VENDOR DESCRIPTION VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE AIIM INTERNATIONAL 1�,MBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP.r THE -AARD FUJITSU Ir MUNICIPALUSINESS COMM. SYSTEMS ILLINOIS LEAGUE MMiICIPAL CLERKS OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL FLAG STATIONERSNORTHWEST ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS 6 "0410m wowa - 11hiBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP., PROD.BT OFFICE FUJITSU BUSINESS COMM. SY'ST'EMS I.E.M. CORPORATION - SQH IOFOA NEOPOST NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECURE DOCUMENT SYSTEMS, INC UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES STAPLE CARTIRIDGE MAILING LABELS QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE IL MUNICIPAL , LOWE MUNICIPAL OF FLAG-INVENTORYOUR SUPPLIESOFFICE 99 BILL 113217 ACCT 15003000144 BILL 108803 J J l CARE MATR I X AN E .A.T I ON TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE 125.00 100.00 47.05 142.97 40.00 90.00 25.00 68.80 72.37 154.48 �y 5 4 .4 8 2 2 6 . 85 68.94 14.75 STAPLE CART I R I DG E 55.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 49-99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 75.58 CREDIT -OFFICE SUPPLIES -48.33 SUPPLIES' OFFICE SUPPLIES ` 116.22 ,W 193.46 MEAD - HATCHER. KEYBOARD/MOUSE 324-69 LASER MAIL LABEL 159.55 COFFEE & SUPP . 72.25 AIR BILL 15.75 AIRBILL 14.00 29.75, 3RD QTR MAINT / SOFEWAR.E 490.18 LINE PRINTER 576.00 I OFOA CONFERENCE - CAROL W I DMER. 200.00 I GFOA CONFERENCE _ L. ELLSWORTH 275-00 475.00 POSTAGE FOR RED INK METER .SUPPLIES 40.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR JULY 99 -229.41 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447` 275.00 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 587.02 862.02 MISC EXPENSES 58.04 MI SC EXPENSES 6.28 64 . 32 SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERV -8/20-8/19/00 800.00 TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE 73.75 •:. List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE 5 V-ENDOR DES-CRIPTION , UNT ul 1�I�II�i1��I re]M-1 ' ►�1_-►Y-1---J_ BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC. BOCA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL -FRANK KRUP FAMILY CODE MISTY DAS REIMB EXPENSES - ANNUAL PICNIC FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE ENVELOPES WHITE FUJITSU BUSINESS COMM. SYSTEMS 3RD QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE 3RD QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE 3RD QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE 3RD QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE 3RD QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC LEASED CAVALIER AUTO NATIONAL FIRE PREVENTION ASSOC NEC HANDBOOK NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR JULY 99 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR JULY 99 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR JULY 99 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 PETTYDEPT. QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. #UILL CORPORATION THE SIDWELL COMPANY SUBURBAN PRESS THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES BUSINESSMISC EXPENSES BUSINESS NOTES :s COOK COUNTY LEASE ATLAS ELECTRICAL WORK PERMIT APPLICATION SPRINKLER WORK PERMIT FIRE ALARM WORK PERMIT BUILDING PERMIT ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE 191.5$ 250.00 250.00 520.00 35.00 90.00 125.00 271.00 277.00 142.97 183.82 331.$8 97.01 97.01 852.69 510.00 570.50 29.$4 4.15, 51.37 95-36 72.37 108.55 188.1.6 57.90 57.90 154.48 231.72 401.65 123.58 123-58 58 11519.89 15.68 105.00 117.20 399.00 158.00 158.00 34.00 34.00 298.00 682.00 52.00 59.00 TOTAL: 61373.00 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 6 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT MISTY DAS CONTRACTORSDICKSON MICHAEL J. MORAN NORTHERN RESOURCE R THE r SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C [60 ILA I n AMERICAN CHARGE SERVICE PETER ANDERSON ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SERVICES DISTINCTIVE -OD APRIL B. FOLEY PTTtTT Tsq..T BUSINESS COMM. SYSTEMS O.B.O.S. INC NATIONAL COUNCIL ON THE AGING NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT,. SPRINGHOUSE DIRECT UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES ►M k CDW GOVERNMENT, INC CRAIG CHARAK CHIEF SUPPLY EXPERIAN FORENSIC IDENTIFICATION FUJI TSU BUSINESS COMM. I CMA.-- 4 01 PLAN TAXI FARES/LUNCHES/TRAIN PASS 104.73 SINGLE FAMILY REHAD-719 DRESSER DR 11500.00 FAMILYSINGLE ` PROGRAM 329.11 SINGLE FAMILY REHAB PROGRAM 10,500.00 RESOURCE REIMB FOR MENTOR PROGRAM ..► ACCESS TO CARE SERVICES 916.66 ACCESS TO CARE SERVICES • • 129.00 ANNUAL - RENEWAL • • 33.32 TOTAL: 14,683.55 SENIOR TAXI RIDES 357.00 CHI INSTRUCTION 10 WEEKS 285.00 COFFEETAI .. COPY MACHINE TONER 329.11 REIM13URSE - MENTOR PROGRAM .. REIMB FOR MENTOR PROGRAM SUPP 75.77 REIMB FOR MENTOR PROGRAM ..► 35.02 179.29 3RD QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE 464.65 PRINTER REPAIR & PICK UP 129.00 ANNUAL - RENEWAL OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR JULY 99 45.56 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 556.13 .. MISC EXPENSES 17.30 NURSING 2000 DRUG HANDBOOK39.90 TYPEWRITER MAINTENANCE 44.25 MEMORY" `, '" ANSIO REIMBURSE EXPENSES LATEX GLOVES LATEX GLOVES BACKGROUND + iSERVICE REGISTER -CRAIG CHARAK SYSTEMS .D QTR MAINT/SOFTWARE ICMA-401 PLAN - R. PAVLOCK 8/12/99 75.49 30.00 264.76 `11298.80 1, 55 . 55 33.00 585.00 21716.39 '' 425.67 List of :Bills Presented to the Board of "trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE 7 VEND3R DESCRIPTION AMOUNT TOTAL: 46,291.58 FIRE DEPARTMENT AGA GAS, INC. OXY IND MEDIUM CYLINDER. RENTAL 32.77 AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC. COMPONENTSULT.EL.PACKLE 66.14 AI REAS NORTH CENTRAL CYLINDER. RENTAL COXUS P 12 5 84.55 AMER.ITECH FINAL BILL -JUN -AUG 1999 17.58 DONALD M. ANDERSON ICE AND MI SC I'T'EMS 26.36 I CMA 401 PLAN - PAVL,OCK 425.67 851.34 INVENTORY TRADING CO NAVY POLO SHIRTS - 14 248.50 KALE UNIFORMS, INC. UNIFORM SUPPL, IES - CSCO ER.ENO 279.15 LITTLE .AMERICA. PRISONER FOOD -JULY, 1999 268.50 MCI WIRELESS SERVICE -6/24/99 - 7/23/99 653.51 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT REGI STER-L . S CHAPS , E . SZMERGALSKI 320.00 NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED -SEPT. 26,615.60 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 113 217 ACCT 150030001447 19.73 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 55.15 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 171.00 BILL, 1.13217 ACCT 150030001447 43.48 BILL 11.3217 ACCT" 150030001.447 11.31 BILL 113217 ACCT" 150030001.447 11469.10 BILL, 108803 ACCT 150030001447 142.56 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 63.24 BILL 108803 ACCT 1.50030001447 151.58 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 45.74 BILI 108803 ACCT 150030001447 11.71 BILL 1.08803 ACCT 150030001447 31135.94 51331.54 PACO REGISTER. -DAVID BEHUN 110.00 PERF REGISTER -RONALD RICRARDSON 395.00 PREISER ANIMAL HOSPITAL STRAYS-JULY,1999 600.00 JOHN E. RF I D AND AS S O C I ATE S AP P L I CANT T;E S T I NG 175.00 PRE - EMPL,COYMEN'T TESTING 175.00 350.00 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION SERVICE GUN CLEANING SYSTEM 106.75 SANE -A-- PET ADOPTION CENTER. STRAYS - J"CTLY, 19 9 9 3 5 0. 0 0 SAYERS COMPUTER SOURCE REPAIR HP LASERJET III 75.00 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES TYPEWRITER. MAINTENANCE 383.50 WOLF CAMERA, INC. POLAROID SPECTRA 'T'WIN FILM 685.80 PHOTO PROCESSING 14.43 PHOTO PROCESSING 18.92 719.15 Z -ROSE PRODUCTIONS PUBLIC RELATION SUPPLIES 3,630.50 TOTAL: 46,291.58 FIRE DEPARTMENT AGA GAS, INC. OXY IND MEDIUM CYLINDER. RENTAL 32.77 AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC. COMPONENTSULT.EL.PACKLE 66.14 AI REAS NORTH CENTRAL CYLINDER. RENTAL COXUS P 12 5 84.55 AMER.ITECH FINAL BILL -JUN -AUG 1999 17.58 DONALD M. ANDERSON ICE AND MI SC I'T'EMS 26.36 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST .31, 1999 PAGE: 8 "gii 11111111111 Pill iiiiii . . . .. ...... . ...... - . .......... 1 0 11 --- ICE/SODA AT THE 4TH OF JULY EVENT 32.11 58.47 BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC. CARTRDGE REFILLS 308-55 3USSE CAR WASH, INC. CAR WASHER FOR JULY 15.75 CHICAGO -KENT COLLEGE OF LAW REGISTER FIGOLAH 11-5-99 SEMINAR 155-00 CINTAS CORP UNIFORM RENTAL 10-80 UNIFORM RENTAL 10.80 UNIFORM RENTAL 10.80 UNIFORM RENTAL 10-80 UNIFORM RENTAL 10.80 UNIFORM RENTAL 10-80 CLEANING SERVICES 11.70 CLEANING SERVICES 11.70 CLEANING SERVICES 11.70 CLEANING SERVICES 11.70 CLEANING SERVICES 11.70 CLEANING SERVICES 11.70 CLEANING SERVICES 11.70 CLEANING SERVICES 11.70, CLEANING SERVICES 11.70 CLEANING SERCICES 11.70 CLEANING SERVICE 11.70 UNIFORM RENTAL 12.00 UNIFORM RENTAL 12.00 UNIFORM RENTAL' 12.00 229.50 ECONO CHEM INC. HYDRO BREAK 937.11 ENDEAVOR PLUS MEDICAL EXAMS 60.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FED EX PICK UP 13.20 FIRE DEPARTMENT INSTITUTE, INC REGISTRATION/WERNER 375.00 W. W. GRAINGER INC. AIR CYLINDER 20-43 WINDOW UNDERLAY 39.29 59.72 HAIGH ENTERPRISES ENTRY FEE FOR FIVE SCUBA DIVERS 100.00 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCT PR PEDESTAL FAN 236.91 ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS FOUND. REGISTRATION/FIGOLAH,MALCOLM 100.00 ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. ASSESSMENT CENTER FEE CAPT.EXAM 11920.00 MEMBERSHIP-MALCOLM 40.00 11960.00 GLENN KOSIENIAK FIRE SEMINAR -DUES 85-00 ALAN L. LABBE REIMBURSEMENT 66.41 REIMBURSEMENT 41.47 107.88 JOHN MALCOLM REIMBURSEMENT 418.25 MONROE SIGN DESIGN WORK OUT WEAR 79.75 MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS INC. AIRFARE -WERNER 294.00 MT.PROSPECT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEP BUNKER BOOTS 45.00 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 9 -"alta,V3I NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP/VALENTINE 200.00 NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP REGISTRATION-=MANN,VALENTINE 278.00 NFPA SEMINARS MANUALS AND WORKBOOKS 203.95 NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED -SEPT. 61653.90 NORTHERN ILLINOIS FIRE MEMBERSHIP/VALENTINE 50.00 NOTARY PUBLIC ASSOCIATION NOTARY RENEWAL/PEYTON SUSAN 41.00 ONE S'T'OP TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 85.08 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 17.83 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 18.04 BILL 1.13217 ACCT 150030001447 24.94 BILI, 113217 ACCT 150030001447 1.7.59 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 45.82 BILI., 113217 ACCT 150030001.447 64.77 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 122.31 BILI, 113217 ACCT 150030001447 53.94 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 11.31 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 11440.15 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 17.83 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 17.95 BILI., 108803 ACCT 150030001.447 24.94 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 17.59 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001.447 45.82 BILL 108803 ACCT 1.50030001447 114.79 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 110.73 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 56.67 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 11.71 BILL, 108803 ACCT 150030001447 3 074.15 r 5,393.96 PERFORMANCE TRAINING SYSTEMS 'PEST BANK UPDATE 1.34.00 PETTY CASH FIRE DEPT. MEETINGS TRAINING SUPP 11.27 MEETINGS TRAINING SUPP 10.00 MEETINGS TRAINING SUPP 26.1.0 MEETINGS TRAINING SUPP 6.60 MEE'T'INGS TRAINING SUPP 18.98 MEETINGS TRAINING SUPP 28,05 MEETINGS TRAINING SUPP a.96 MEETINGS TRAINING SUPP 22.44 1.31.40 RAYMARK OFFICE PROD & FURN OFFICE SUPPLIES 39.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.46 CREDIT -OFFICE SUPPLIES -37.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 258.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139.1.3 474.35 RED WING SHOE STORE FOOT WEAR 135.00 FOOT WEAR 136.00 List of Bills Presented r+►i r Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 10 0 R DESCRIPTION AMOUNT' 10 1 %wil mo RON ta NO I MICHAEL T. . WESTSHORE PAUL WOJCIK X6101I • •► 0 low a 100 1 �► I ■. EXPENSES/WERNER MICHAEL AUGUST DIVE TEAM DRILL TOLLS AND FUEL EXPRESES FOR DIVE VVBLIC WORKS - A AMERITECH JUNE 14 - AUG 13, 1999 CHRIS BARZANO REIMB FOR OBTAINING CDL CELLULAR •PHONE CINTAS CORP REPLACEMENT UNIFORM UNIFORM CLEANING & RENT UNIFORM RENTAL &- CLE IN UNIFORM RENTAL • J FRANCISCO GUERRERO JOHN HUFFMAN MAIL BOXES ETC. USA ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIOVS �, m JOHN POHLMANN RED WING SHOE STORE SMITH OF GALETON GLOVES, INC. SCOTT VASKO WAREHOUSE DIRECT REIMB, FOR PURCHASE OF O 9 REIM8 FOR PURCHASE, ,% • • ` OBTAINING UPS CHARGES - INV. FOR JUN/JUL 9 9 BILL ACCT 150030001447 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 oil 14 i BID .. IV . REIMBURSEMENT SAFETY PURCHASE 12 MROWN JERSEY GLOVES REIMB FOR OBTAINING CDL SUPPLIESMISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 458.00 248.00 115.00 358.04 11470.00 27.98 15.83 11.88 2.71 43.55 101.95 491.50 80.00 33.50 A, 21,577.65 560.28 30.00 108.1✓ 222.41 127.81 128.44 124.69 137.19 740.54 85.00 85.00 30.00 37.94 926.33 11977.34 21903.67 50.40 5.54 66.60 30.00 174.40 71.70 34.40 228.27 8.35 22.48 2 4 ..... 8.3. List of Bills Board .e AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 11 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. ASPHALT "PAVING•A ANDERSON PEST CONTROL ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY FtAYMOND ANTOCI LEONARD !!�'EST QUALITY CLEANING, INC. CIADE INDUSTRIES 00 go ��r �, • B :HANEY AND SONS , INC. JAMES JACOB S EN FRANK rJ`ANE K I US KE J L KELLY JOHN KERIMIDAS J.C. LICHT COMPANY MCCAULEY MECHANICAL SERVICE VIRGINIA. MIKA NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS CHESTER PYTILK RAMIREZ, INC. SCHWEPPE & SONS SOUND INCORPORATED -E .: G: i��► iii+ + �•�1 BUILDING 1 '` AVITROL ON ROOF TOPS LOCK REPAIRS CLEAN D LUBRICATE CYLINDER LOC CLEANINGREIMBURSEMENT FOR 9 SQ REIMBURSEMENT FOR 5 SQ CLEANING SERVICE -JULY PRODUCTS CLEANINGPRODUCTS CLEANING PRODCLEANING UCTCLEANING S PRODUCTSCLEANING CLEANING PRODUCTS CREDIT -CHEMICAL CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES OF SIDEWALK OF SIDEWALK 285.02 3,114.55 55.25 94.80 85.00 72.04 252.84 315.00 175.00 7,101.50 237.15 237.15 475.65 237.15 237.15 444-50 237.15 21105.90 --22.50 99.57 99.57 122.18 299.02 206.40 116.30 E►.�EEi� PARTS 9.95 PARTS 9.95 PARTS 74.82 94.72 DISPOSAL DEBRIS REIMBURSEMENT FOR s OF r REIM13URSEMENT FOR 5 SQ OF r REIMBURSEMENT FOR 3 SQ SIDEWALK0 REIMBURSEMENT TO COVER THE COSTSr .00 PAINT SUPP FOR MONTH OF JULY 99 14P.50 SERVICE O PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG. REIMBURSEMENT FOR 6 SQ OF r ELEC SUPP-INV. FOR MONTH & SUPPLIES 12.51 REBATETRAVEL .. 19 +r OF PUBLIC WALK 665.00 DISPOSAL Ow LUNCHROOM SUPPLIES SERVICEARM 165.25 SERVICE FOR ZONE #3 396.00 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 12 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT SAFETY GLASSES 4.10 24.46 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WATER SERVICE 10.71 WAL-MART STORES, INC. BLDG SUPP 3.97 WLI INDUSTRIES, INC. 50 # BAGS.GLASS BEADS 38.74 HANK ZENDER 25 LIN FT OF CURB & GUTTER 175-00 TOTAL: 18,084.28 PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/GRNDS ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BUILDING MATLS FOR MONTH OF JULY 8.98 AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. FOAM EAR PLUGS 32.92 AGDIA INCORPORATED SAMPLE TESTED FOR ELMS YELLOW DISE 175.00 BERTHOLD NURSERY TREES 500.00 TREES 11000.00 TREES 41700.00 TREES 71447.00 TREES 949.00 TREES 15,824.00 TREES 295.00 TREES 315-00 TREES 860.00 31,890-00 B. HANEY AND SONS, INC. DISPOSAL OF DEBRIS 512.50 ROBERT W. HENDRICKSEN CO. TREE TRIMMING 12tl63.00 LUNDSTROM'S, NURSERY MOWING FOR WEEK ENDING 7/24 11355.02 TURF MOWING PAYMENTS 21607.32 31962.34 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 16.00 TOTAL 48,760.74 B & H INDUSTRIES PLAN COPIER PAPER 245-14 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELEC SUPP-INV . FOR MONTH OF JULY 349-57 SEILER INSTRUMENT & MFG. CO. TRIMBLE TSC1 MAUNTING BRACKET 230.00 STEINER ELECTRIC COMPANY CIRCUIT BREAKER 137.60 CIRCUIT BREAKER 54.73 192.33 TOPCON MIDWEST BUNDLED STAKES 202.75 TOTAL: 11219.79 List of Bills Presented . • • AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 13 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACTION CONCRETE & SUPPLIES,INC RAPID SET CONCRETE MIX RAPID SET CONCRETE MIX eupffiellao-0.0 ww 0*4'10 AMERICAN LANDSCAPING INCI AMERITECH 0 BUILDING MATLS FOR. MONTH OF JULY BUILDING MATLS FOR MONTH OF JULY" BUILDING MATLS FOR MONTH OF JULY s, . . RESTORATION 605 S EDWARD SERVICE JUN 17 - AUG 16, 1999 SERVICE JUL 11 - AUG 10, 1999 HP PRINTER CARTRIDGE SERVIVE & TRAVEL TIME SERVICE &TRAVEL TIME GOVERNMENT,Cf14KGES FOR TRACE READING SYSTEM WATER METERS WATER METERS CDW CELLULAR " 7/99" PHONECELL CINTAS CORP REPLACEMENT UNIFORM ORMRENTAL & CLEANING UNIFORM CLEANING & RENTAL UNIFORM RENTAL & CLEANING UNIFORM RENTAL &: CLEANING _WUPAGE TOPSOIL ENGINEERED FILL SYSTEMS FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP W. W. GRAINGER INC. HBK WATER METER SERVIC> IL CITY/COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSC ILLINOIS .ARBORIST ASSOCIATION KAISER PROFESSIONAL PHOTO LAB LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC CONCRETE DELIVERY A.SPOTLIGHT SAVING BATTERIES FOR BARRICADE MEMBERSHIPREADINGS READINGS EXCHANGE INSPECTIONS READINGS FIELD TEST & LABOR ANNUAL DUES PROCESSINGTRAINING-LAURA FOWLE/MIKE STEPHEN6 FILM RENTAL OF CAMPACT CARS RENTAL OF COMPACTCARS 700 0# 700 0# 1, 40`0 . 0'`20 ✓'+ 2 . ✓ 1.01.17 178.22 331.91 90.00 -53.50 26-50 509.00 58-42 41.12 99.54 27.95 252.80 415.60 678.40 409-82. 81530.00 11 772.00 20,711.82 356.78 108.14 222.42 127.82 128.44 124.69 137.19 740.56 480.00 320.00 800.00 782.34 r 155.97 97.00 156.86 239.49 350.00 228.65 49.00 1,036.00 145.75 300.00 8.40 21040.00 700.00 List of Tills Presented to the Bayard of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 14 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 2,740.00 J. C. L I CHT COMPANY PAINT SUPP FOR MONTH OF JULY 99 3 3. 2 6 PAINT SUPP FOR. MONTH OF JULY 99 310-60 343.86 LUNDSTROM' S NURSERY FRIM HONEYSUCKLE EINE 260.00 MOWING FOR. WEEK ENDING 7/24 117.50 TURF MOWING PAYMENTS 235.00 51.2.50 MARSH - MCB IRNEY , INC. FREIGHT CHARGES FOR. S /H OF CABLE 5.79 MINUTEMAN PRESS TREE ROOT TAGS 47.46 2P FORESTRY RESIDENT RESPONSE CARD 275.00 322.46 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL -FILM L SAFETY FILM 65.00 M I KKE NEURURER. LICENSE RENEWAL 10-00 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 11321.7 ACCT 150030001447 725.10 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001.447 30.38 BILL 113217 AC'M'E 150030001447 30.38 BILL 113217 .ACME 150030001447 60.73. BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 30.38 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 30.38 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 25.41 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 30.07 BILL 11.3217 ACCT 150030001447 24.09 BILL 11321.7 ACCT 150030001447 20.15 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 73.56 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 127.82 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 187.56 BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 20.37 BILL 11.3217 ACCT 150030001447 38.08 BILI, 113217 ACCT 150030001447 1,932.26 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 11774.02 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 74.40 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 72.29 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 144.58 BILL 103803 ACCT 150030001447 66.01 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001.447 31.46 BILL 108803 .ACCT 150030001447 19.64 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 21.90 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 23.05 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 19.88 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 56.40 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 146.46 BILL 108803 AC'C'T 150030001447 1.87.56 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 51.19 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 75.43 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 4,124.61 100 275.+61 POSTMASTER. CYCLE 3 7 8 BUDGET CYCLE 1 537.6G List of Bills Presented •• ♦ Board Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 15 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 1 0 SEILER INSTRUMENT MFG. CO. SMITH OF GALETON GLOVES, INC. 'OCORPORATION BANK TRUST WHITE SANDS WLI INDUSTRIES INC. 1'w I a 10, 1• 11 �a . ► • . LORI I DBMS o AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. 'T'R.IMBLE GPS PATHFINDER MAPPING SYS 12 DOZEN,BROWN JERSEY GLOVES CORDFR.EE IMPACT GUN JULY 1999 JULY 1999 JULY 1999 JULY 1999 FIRE HYDRANT SANDBLASTED •TYPE I BARRICADES TIPPING TIPPING FEES/FIXED COST�.' RENTAL OF COMPACT CARS BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 BILL :► 1: 1150030001447 #06 CREDIT—CLUTCH STIHL CHAINSAW PARTS STIHL CHAINSAW PARTS AMOCO • PAA. LINE 588.78 11126.44 9199S.00 71.70 370.00 161,120.00 11,344.00 14$116.00 92 84 0 . 0 0 279,420.00 59.82 5.88 65.70 228.27 101.26 -66.51 263.02 �►► 1, 712.50 905.50 112,110.07 -47.87 47.77 281.90 78.00 359.80 46.05 30.50 76.55 34.83 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 16 VENDOR DES"CRIPTION AMOUNT 1 -11 ilki 11!% uy FOR 100 1 BILL'S LAWN & POWER BRIGGS & STRATTON STARTER RACHET 23.97 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER HDWE AND AUTO SUPP 25.03 HDWE AND AUTO SUPP 82.53 HDWE AND AUTO SUPP 120.96 HDWE AND AUTO SUPP 264.46 492.98 THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY FORD KING PIN KIT 209.04 BRAKE VELVE 69.36 278.40 CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CLEANING SUPPLIES 79.82 CLEANING SUPPLIES 28.40 CLEANING SUPPLIES 38-00 146.22 DAVE & JIM'S AUTO BODY, INC. FRONT WHEEL ALIGNMENTS 1-23 35.00 RECHARGE A/C SYSTEM # S-31 35. 0 0 70.00 DIRTBUSTER AUTO DETAIL SERVICE FOR P-17 121.50 SERVICE-CHEVY CAPRICE C29-917 121.50, 243.00 DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS IDLER ARM 97.80 IDLER ARM 19.56 INJECTION CLEANER 36.00 PARTS 173.27 326.63 FRIES AUTOMOTIVE TOWED FROM RIVER KENSINGTON/CENTRA 95.00 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES TRACTOR TIRE 336.13 TIRES 526.08 862.21 HARRIS EQUIPMENT REPLACE FAN ON AIR DRYER 97.30 REPLACE FAN ON AIR DRYER 471.75 569.05 INTERSTATE BATTERIES BATTERIES 215.85 J & L INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. COATED HERTEL DRILL 20.55 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. VARIOUS INVOICES FOR JUNE/JULY 99 198.00 VARIOUS INVOICES FOR JUNE/JULY 99 2,677-9 9 21875.99 LEND INDUSTRIES, INC. ETKSCCWP STOBE KIT 214.90 MATCO TOOLS A/C CLUTCH TOOL KIT 99.95 METRO ENVIRONMENTAL CONTR,INC . SERVICE CALL 150.00 SERVICE CALL 150-00 SERVICE CALL 345.00 645.00 MIDWAY TRUCK PARTS GOODYEAR BELTS 138.96 GOODYEAR BELTS 14.21 GOODYEAR BELT 6.37 15', 9. 5 4 MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST AUTO PARTS 125.00 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 17 VENDOR- DESCRIPTION AMOUNT t*30)CO DISPLAY MATERIAL SUPPLIES 646.9� ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BUILDING MATLS FOR MONTH OF JULY 53-33 MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI SEPTEMBER PMT. 21916.67 ROUSE-RANDHURST SHOP CENT,INC. RENT -SEPTEMBER 21000.00 WAL-MART STORES, INC. BLDG SUPP 50.18 WGN FLAG AND DECORATING CO. FLORAL SHEETING 875.69 TOTAL: 61542.81 AUTO PARTS 110.00 AUTO PARTS 250.00 485.00 ONE STOP TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 113217 ACCT 150030001447 108.55 BILL 108803 ACCT 150030001447 231.72 340-27 PETTY CASH PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 2.90 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 99.57 102.47 POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY NAVISTAR INT'L REPLACEMENT PARTS 540-64 NAVISTAR INT'L REPLACEMENT PARTS 610.29 NAVISTAR INT'L REPLACEMENT PARTS 99.30 NAVISTAR INT'L REPLACEMENT PARTS 0.99 CREDIT -TIE -ROD -101.16 CREDIT -WASHER -.0.91 CREDIT -CORE RETURN -55.66 CREDIT -BRACKET -162.94 930.55 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION CLEAN & SERVICE PARTS WASHERS 354.75 SOURCE FUEL DISPENSING REPAIR PARTS 321.29 STANDARD EQUIPMENT COMPANY ELGIN STEERING HUBS 489.93 ELGIN STEERING HUBS 6.51 496.44 P. R. STREICH & SONS, INC. REPAIR 31 TRUCK HOIST CYLINDER 90.00 REPAIR 31 TRUCK HOIST CYLINDER 165.00 255.00 TECHNICIANS PARTS WAREHOUSE 30# CYLINDER R-12 FREON 519.00 ELECTRIC FUEL PUMP 307.64 REPLACEMENT PARTS 521.53 PARTS 753.91 PARTS 582-83 PARTS 2 05. 77 21890.68 TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY MONTHLY RENTAL OF GAS CYLINDER 3.00 UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY AC DELCO BRAKE PARTS 991.48 TOTAL: 14,981.35 t*30)CO DISPLAY MATERIAL SUPPLIES 646.9� ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BUILDING MATLS FOR MONTH OF JULY 53-33 MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI SEPTEMBER PMT. 21916.67 ROUSE-RANDHURST SHOP CENT,INC. RENT -SEPTEMBER 21000.00 WAL-MART STORES, INC. BLDG SUPP 50.18 WGN FLAG AND DECORATING CO. FLORAL SHEETING 875.69 TOTAL: 61542.81 List of Bills Presented to the Board ! .. AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 18 `VENDOF,DESCRIPTION HUM Q TOWN m_Lvj I MIN ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC. ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL AIR PRODUCTSEQUIP. ALBRECHT AUTUMN TREE Ar EXPERTS BLUE ,. CDW GOVERNMENT, INC CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUr r CHICAGO TURF & IRRIGATION r. DAVEY TREE EXPERTSCOMPANY DES PLAINES GLASS COMPANY DIALOGIC r • CORP. DUPONTR. W. DUNTEMAN CO. FLOORING SYSTEMS COMM.FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FUJITSU BUSINESS B. HANEY AND SONS, INC. HELLER LUMBER CO. HENRICKSEN & COMPANY, J.C. LICHT COMPANY NURSERY MERCOMM13E J.C. MUEHLFELT & SONS, INC. NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SECURE DOCUMENT SYSTEMS, INC SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS, INC. INSTALLED` 81 00 BUILDINGAFOR MONTH OF JULY 171.95 GRIDSCEILING '`A 70.00 GRIDSCEILING DUCT HARDWARE00 212.00 ADDITION PORTION 10,869.80 REMOVALDEMOLISH ELM TREE 950.00 ITHA 153PRJll PARALLEL 179.30 TECHNICALI 300 .00 HP PRINTER 753.99 CEILING TILE & ACCESSORIES PURCHASE OF A 1999 TORO WORKMAN 28,573.00 CLEAN P AT 202 W HIAWATHA 720.00 REPLACEMENT INTERIOR WINDOW 280.00 EQUIPMENT `GENCY CALL 26,000.00 CENTRAL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 149,771.25 r ■OFFICE/CONFERENCE RM r • AIRBILL 14.00 SERVICE BASEMENT REMODEL PROJ 328.00 rN TEST/REPAIR 307.50TEST/REP. 922.50 WELLER CREEK CLEANING31,345.00 BLDG r BLDG rP i -00 177.42 PAINT SUPP FOR MONTH OF JULY 99 399.94 DIRT WORK ALONG WELLER CREEK 570.00 CAT5 CABLE -VILLAGE HALL PROJ 396.75 688.75 GENERALREMOVAL OF O' 15,000 .00 ELEC SUPP-INV. FOR MONTH OF JULY 275.69 SERVICE00 SERVICE 11452.00 TOTAL 277r013.73 *RUG CARD, INC. PRESCRIPTION CARD CLAIMS AUGUST 91440.50 FIRST NATIONAL BANK PAYMENT 160.00 GENERALLUTHERAN •► . . 430-50 THE SIGN PALACE REPAIR -RIGHT REAR DOOR 95.00 REPAIR -RIGHT .A.+R 95.00 List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 19 VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT RISK MANAGEMENT 1 190.00 STATE TREASURER RATE ADJUSTMENT FUND -WORKER COMP 11182.63 TOTAL: 11,403.63 NON -DEPARTMENTAL FAYETTE WUEST VLG OF MT PROSPECT BOND -12/1/32 IN 530.00 TOTAL: 530.00 GRAND TOTAL: 1, 8 5 2, 17 6. .. List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees AUGUST 31, 1999 PAGE: 20 .......... SUMMARY BY FUND ...................... 01 GENERAL FUND 760,550.26 03 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 115r093-20 05 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 149,771.25 07 COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT 15,213.15 51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 66,719.69 55 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST FUND 26,183.80 59 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 33,585.00 61 WATER AND SEWER FUND 381,887.84 63 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 700.50 66 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND 33,318.70 68 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND 753.99 69 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 11,403.63 71 POLICE PENSION FUND 112,267.30 72 FIRE PENSION FUND 108,937.60 73 BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND 2182G.60 77 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 2,584-52 79 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 30,379-85 11852,176.88 Mi VW1 00 RESOLUTION NO, . . .... A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO NORB HUECKER FOR SERY91,Z*?EJQJRESQM WHEREAS, NORB HUECKER, a resident of neighboring Arlington Heights, has served the residents of Mount Prospect for more than 60 years, having taken over the family- owned business in the 1930s; and WHEREAS, Huecker's Service Station, at the corner of Central Road and Main Street, has been a mainstay in downtown Mount Prospect for decades; and WHEREAS, NORB HUECJ<ER has been a respected businessman in the community, and a fair and honest neighbor, always going the extra mile to accommodate customers and provide extraordinary service; and WHEREAS, NORB HUECKER is a loyal and respected friend to many, consistently providing an atmosphere of comfort and warmth to every patron, and exemplifying Mount Prospect's motto, "Where Friendliness Is a Way of Life;" and WHEREAS, the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect have benefited greatly from the service provided by NORB HUECKER, and express their gratitude for his contributions to the development of Mount Prospect, both in the past and the future. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: .%� —C JJ' -Q, N--' - �, Q t 4 E -, That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby acknowledge and recognize NORB HUECKER'S, years of service to the community and hereby express gratitude on behalf of every resident. That an official copy of this Resolution be suitably prepared and presented to NORB HUECKER as a perpetual memento. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: Passed and approved this day of 1999. ATTEST: 'Nairne —WL ­`ow e Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor I I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PkeSPECT- BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE*, That in accordance with Subsection A of Section 13.108 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, the Corporate Authorities shall determine the number of Liquor Licenses available in each Classification and shall establish a list specifying the number of Liquor Licenses authorized. Said list is hereby dmended by decreasing the number of Class R Liquor Licenses by one (1) Sun's Chinese, 1747-49 West Algonquin Road. Said list is as follows: Zero (0) Class A License Two (2) Class B Licenses Nine (9) Class C Licenses One (1) Class D License Two (2) Class E Licenses One (1) Class G License Zero (0) Class H License Zero (0) Class M License Zero (0) Class P License Sixteen (16) Class R Licenses Sixteen (16) Class S Licenses One (1) Class T License Five (5) Class W Licenses SECTION TWO:. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: ILI PASSED and APPROVED this day of ATTEST: Village Clerk Village President N Class Establishment Number A 0 B Dumas Walter's; Ye Olde Town Inn 2 C Alvee's Liquors; Balzano Liquors; Dominick's (83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors; Jay Liquors; Mt. Prospect Liquors; Osco Drugs; Walgreens (83 and Golf); Walgreens (Mt.. Prospect Plaza) 9 D Prospect Moose Lodge 1 E Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's Banquet Hall 2 G Mt. Prospect Park District -Golf Course 1 H 0 M 0 P 0 R Artemis; Chungkiwa Restaurant; Cuisine of India; Fellini; Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); Han River; House of Szechwan; Izakaya Sankyu; LaTejanita; Little America; Nina Restaurant; Pusan; Riva Bella; Sakura; Taqueria Fiesta; Torishin 17 S Applebee's; Bella Capri; El Sombrero; Jake's Pizza; Jameson's Charhouse; Kampai; The Loft; Mrs. P & Me Restaurant; New Shin Jung; Nikki D's Charhouse; Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant; Pap's Grill & Bar; Retro, Bistro; Rokudenashi; Sam's Place 16 T Thunderbird Lanes I W Fra nkie's Fast Food; Los Arcos Restaurant; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace; Photo's Hot Dogs 5 53 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO" BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: MAYOR GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLEY DATE: SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS I hereby nominate the following individuals to the various Boards and Commissions below: Economic De've,110p(ment Com - i,,ssion ReappgintmenLs: Bennett P. Trapani 222 South Pine Street H) 255-5386 John Arndt 17 North Marcella Road H) 296-2602 Finance Commission ointment* Charles F. Bennett 403 North Pine Street H) 392-5744 First appointed 12/92 Former Mount Prospect Library Board member. Replaces Newt Hallman who retired. ... ..... . .. f, �rw PP f J0, ab f F Plan Commission Regp,pgintment', Carol H. Tortorello 223 South Elmhurst Avenue H) 392-3682 Youth Commission 0 Rea,j2p,glintments-, x Kathryn Coletto 1632 Barberry Lane H) 827-0696 Julie Higginson 809 South Maple Street H) 870-0327 Laura Higginson 809 South Maple Street H) 870-0327 Yomiko Patel 1707 West Victoria Drive, #2A H) 437-6077 Alicen Prikkel 1731 Pheasant Trail H) 439-7641 Appointments,* Patrick Frank 1005 Greenfield Lane H) 398-3157 Amanda Braus 612 West Dempster H) 439-3261 First appointed 7/91 1 First appointed 10/97 Hersey First appointed 10/97 Lincoln First appointed 10/97 Lincoln First appointed 10/97 Rolling Meadow4 First appointed 10/97 Rolling Meadows Grade 8 Endorsements attached. Grade 12 Endorsements attached, River Trails Prospect I heartily endorse the above individuals for service to the Mount Prospect community. Thank you for your consideration of their interest and qualifications. GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLE GLF/rcc Mayor attachments c: Village Manager Michael Janonis Community Development Director William Cooney Norman Kurtz, Chairman, Economic Development Commission Michael Hoffman, Chairman, Plan Commission Finance Director Douglas Ellsworth John Korn, Chairman, Finance Commission Police Chief Ronald Pavlock Alicen Prikkel, Chair, Youth Commission APPLICATION FOR YOUTH COMMISSION MOUNT PROSPECT 4 GRADE�.,,' YEAR OF GRADUATION r Please answer the following quer ions. If you need additio''nal space, please attach a second sheet of paper. I. # Why do you want to serve on the youth commission? � �1�-� � Wl C C) Y`n �I�tJKI I C�h YYY��e 1 `�"�.. � C`1"T�-r � �,al Ce, j"o l i i/'e, � � , 2. What do you feel are major concerns facing teens today? Ir`t /� .,�C�1� � I e_er � vim. �` 3. Please tell a bit about yourself your interests, your activities etc. o v� �`��' S �io�na,� JL ni`oc �►rt�r ► '�, � Ian pl�� r\ 4. Can you come to one meeting a month.) ��S Please attach two letters of recommendation by two adults who know you well. Please mail application to Village Manager's Office, Village of Mount Prospect, 100 S. Emerson St., Mount Prospect ILL 60056, --Marguerite E. Hard 1003 Greenfield Lane Mount Prospect Illinois 60056 JULY 0 3.s 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WE WOULD HEARTILY RECOMMEND PATRICK FRANK TO BE A MEMBER OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT YOUTH C OMj'1 I S S I ON fe HE HAS BEEN OUR NEXT—DOOR NEIGHBOR FOR OVER 9 YEARS, WHEN HE WAS OLD ENOUGH, WE HIRED HIM TO TAKE CARE OF OUR PROPERTY WHEN WE LEFT TOWN, HE WOULD PUSH OUR MAIL THROUGH THE SLOT.- IN OUR HOUSE) PUT THE NEWSPAPERS IN A BOX ON THE PORCH; KEEP ANY PACKAGES AT HIS HOME UNTIL WE RETURNED- MOW THE LAWN, WATER THE FLOWERS r— # .s AND FILL THE THREE BIRD— BATHS; AND SHOVEL THE DRIVEWAY IN THE WINTER. HE IS VERi%,,-CONSCIENTIOUS AND RESPONSIBLE. BESIDES ALL THAT, HE IS VERY FRIENDLY AND POLITE. S I N C E RE4-,*Y MARGUERITE E. HARTL MAX E• HARTL Betsy, Busse, 1007 North Greenfield Lane Mount Prospect, IL 60056-1333 847-577-8057 847-577-8503 fax Mayor Gerald Farley Village Manager's Office Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Mayor Farley, I would like to recommend Patrick Frank to you as a prospective member of the village Youth Commission. I have known Patrick for 9 years and have been impressed by his initiative and maturity, both of which far exceed normal levels for his age. Patrick is considerably bright and responsible. He is also quite comfortable and skilled in conversing with adults, which is an attribute I have found necessary for a successful tenure on this commission. I feel that Patrick Frank would be an asset to this board and has the potential to serve on the commission for many years, lending the much needed continuity which we currently lack. I hope that you will consider his appointment with my highest endorsement in mind. Sincerely, Ito Betsysse Application for Amanda Braus for the Youth Commission 1.Wby do y YO . 1. uvant - oscrye on the 'ith comnusst on? I would like to serve on the Mt. Prospect Youth commission because growing up with parents in the Mt. Prospect Jaycees I see many benefits from being involved in the community. I also enjoy seeing the work I do make a difference. I hope that by joining this commission, I can use my talents to make some positive changes. I believe that there are many troubled areas in our city where the teens are not getting the attention they need, and are not being taught fundamental lessons such as staying away from drugs, smoking, drinking, and reckless behavior. Some of these teens would change their ways if only they could find something else to occupy their time. Perhaps we should plan events fun for teens to attend that would center around particular themes such as getting along with your parents. During these events we could offer food, music, games, movies, but at some point in the evening we should take time to have an open discussion to talk about the problems that teens have. 3. Please, tell a bit abq'u1,_'yq4,,rsejfoig.interests , iour activities etc. I am 17 years old, an incoming senior at Prospect High School. I have been involved in the music program at our school since freshman year. I play the violin in orchestra,, and sing in choir. I helped organize and run a Bible Study at our public school which held meetings once a week, and however controversial, was very successfid. I joined the service club at our school,, and played Bingo with senior citizens every Wednesday for the year. I am also involved in the Net at St. Raymond church, we go to meetings once a week to plan for a monthly teen mass. I am a Lector and Eucharist minister. I help my father Lawrence Braus run activities with the Mt. Prospect Jaycees. In my spare time I like to play various sports. 4. Cati yoq L c t JD s,pggKA onth? qg-- -M- TAP Mount Prospect Teens and Parents for a Better Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Mount Prospect, IL 60056 (847) 255-1820 August 12, 1999 Mayor Gerald L. Farley Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Skip: I would like to recommend Amanda Braus for membership on Mount Prospect's Youth Commission. I have know Amanda for about six years through her work -- and the work of her mother and father -- for TAP Mount Prospect. As well as being friendly and courteous in her dealings with others, Amanda also is a serious young woman who is not afraid to make decisions and shoulder responsibility. Amanda and her mother regularly attended TAP's monthly meetings in the first few years of its operation and, in the early days of Club RecPlex, Amanda and her mother were the only volunteers who came out to help every Friday evening on a regular and reliable basis. I believe Amanda would make a sound addition to the Youth Commission and would aid in its work for a better community. Sincerely, lie George A. 'jloaves Chairman, TAP Mount Prospect The purpose of TAP Mount Prospect is to promote youth as responsible citizens in Mount Prospect. Our mission is to provide a safe and secure environment for all citizens in our community, 6 6 I'm wnting regarding the application of Nfiss Amanda Braus for a position on the Mount Prospect Youth ConlMission. I strongly recommend that you promptly accept Amanda to the commission as she would be a tremendous asset. It has been my pn*vllege to work with Amanda at St. Raymond's Parish in the area of youth mu'u"stry. She has shown a strong personal commitment to having a positive impact onher peers and her --co M-munity. She is willilig, t 0 - work hard to M*sure the success of planned events and has contributed -many creative ideas that we have implemented. Amanda is an effective representative of her peers -because -she listens well and is sensitive to the needs and views ofodwrs. 1 # ad on,, -her se&c�dence and -excellent # 4 - .Conlinw,'cat'lon, skills -make it a pleasuremyself and -the -other adult volunteers at St. Raymonds to work with Amanda. You can be sure that Amanda will be a thoughtfid, responsible voice for the youth of Mt. Prospect. Sincerely, Mr. Joseph Sonnefeldt 218 N. Fanoovi`ew Mt. Prospect, JIL 60056 res. (847) 368-8824 bus. (847) 477-5438 TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER q FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'P DATE: SEPTEMBER 3 1999 SUBJECT: ZBA-25-99, CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY FRONT PORCH The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a Conditional Use to permit construction of a front porch encroaching 5 feet into the required front setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their August 26, 1999 meeting. The subject property is an existing home located on an interior single-family lot on a residential street set back 30' from the front lot line. The applicant plans to re -roof the house and, in conjunction with the re - roof, proposes to add an unenclosed porch along the front of the house. The proposed porch is approximately 5' deep and includes a porch/seating area near the door, a covered walkway from the driveway to the porch, and a landscape area. The petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to allow the porch addition to encroach 5' into the required front yard. After a brief discussion of the property and the Zoning Code Conditional Use standards, the Zoning Board of Appeals members voted 5-0 to recommend approval of a request for Conditional Use approval for the construction of an unenclosed porch 25 feet from the front property line at 407 N. Fairview Avewg*..., Widliam-,, J. Cooney Jr.". AICP 99 H:\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 1999 Mw Memos\ZBA-25-99 Memo (Sibat) mej memo.doc VIL"LAGE OF MOUNTPROSPECT Community Development Department A4 it A M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEKI C11A1RPERSON FROM: JEFF PERKINS,P' DATE: AUGUST 20, 1999 SUBJECT: ZBA-25-99/CONDMONAL USE TO CONSTRUCT AN UNENCLOSED PORCH IN A PORTION OF REQUMED FRONT YARD I. " Q 10101119,3 Petitioner: Heidi Sibert 407 N. Fairview Avenue Mount Prospect EL 60056 Property Address: 407 North Fairview Avenue Status of Petitioner: Owner of the Property Parcel Number: 03-34-125-008 Lat Size: 7,246 square feet Existing Zoning: R -A S Ingle Family Residence Existing Land Use: Single Family Residence Lot Coverage: 28% existing 30% proposed 50% maximum per RA district th Requested Action: Proposal for a Conditional Use to allow construction of a porch addition within 25 feet ofthe front property line. zo 9,1106 0171M VC K *- ]TOM ii ii 10 JON I li��Iliixu; The subject property is an existing home located on an interior single-family lot on a residential street. The home is currently set back 30' from the front lot line and meets the required minimum front setback. The applicant plans to re -roof the house and, in conjunction with the re -roof, proposes to add an unenclosed porch along the front of the house. The proposed porch is approximately 5' deep and includes a porch/seating area near the door, a covered walkway from the driveway to the porch, and a landscape area. The Petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to allow the portion of the porch addition along the front of the structure (approximately 35') to encroach 5' into the required front yard. As illustrated on the attached plot plan, - the porch would be attached to the front of the existing home and set back 25' feet from the front property line. The petitioner feels that the porch addition would improve the functionality of the house by creating a covered walkway from the driveway to the front door and improve the home's appearance. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting of August 26, 1999 ZBA-25-99 To conduct its analysis of the proposed Conditional Use, staff reviewed the petitioner's plat of survey, plot plan, and elevations and visited the site. Conditional Use Standards The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. These standards relate to: ca The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; o The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; o Adequate provision of utilities and drainage and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and c3 Compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The subject parcel for the proposed Conditional Use is a 7,246 square foot parcel developed with a single family home. The applicant proposes a porch that extends into the front setback. Encroachment of a porch up to 5' into the front setback is a Conditional Use in the RA district and the proposal meets all other zoning requirements. The proposal would have no negative impaction the- adjacent area, utility provision or public streets. The proposed Conditional Use will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The essential character of the neighborhood — a single-family residential area — would not be affected by the proposed Conditional Use and the Conditional Use would not have any significant effect on the public welfare. 160.1 XIKS 7WI_&tD)_0_ The proposed porch addition enhances the existing home and the proposal meets the Conditional Use standards contained in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the ZBA make a recommendation to the Village Board to approve a Conditional Use for a covered, unenclosed porch to encroach 5' into the required front setback for the residence at 407 N. Fairview Avenue, Case No. ZBA-25-99. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. concur: /JP 11VMV021DEM1COMDEV\GEMPLNG'IZBA\ZBA 1999\Staff Memos\ZBA-25-99 Memo (Slbert).doc Prospect High School x HM rest 1Viemory Lane Location Map Case No. ZBA 25m99 407 N. Fairview Pftpmred By: Sibert Conditional Use Village of Mount Prospect Department of Community Development - Planning Division August 18, 1999 Avenue N, FAIRVIEW AVENU72 'ORD r. 15 916 -E OF FENCE IS 0.65 NORTH I (ft I � l Ix SOVTH FACE OF FENCE IS 0.39 t 77:, Wu p P FRA G -A 0 E CR�rr. APR .77 7777, Will 7 .7— M 1° �' M1d d �. N .x mm' �'I ou �.0 W p9 9D �d .q N � � ,.",qw 4%, A. 0 3479 `4 4 r% 1-1 /2 STORY FRAME 0 RESIDENCE Na. 40 OL IS 0.40 NORTH EAST FACE IS OJ 4 WEST -E OF FENCE IS 0.65 NORTH I (ft I � l Ix SOVTH FACE OF FENCE IS 0.39 t 77:, Wu p P FRA G -A 0 E ft - r - Cyto CHAIN LINK FENCE 01 NORTH FACE OF FENCE IS 0.05 SOI NORTH FACE OF FENCE IS OJO SO AND THE EAST FACE 1S 0.04 WES r% CE OF FENCE IS 0.40 NORTH EAST FACE IS OJ 4 WEST WI ft - r - Cyto CHAIN LINK FENCE 01 NORTH FACE OF FENCE IS 0.05 SOI NORTH FACE OF FENCE IS OJO SO AND THE EAST FACE 1S 0.04 WES ?=P � Cf) 0 C) cr C: 4 CD X ct) 0. CD CD co) =3 0 CD CD CD CD AM, cn 2 ?iF .r cn o Q c~ CD ;'n'r "■7 r CD cli 1-nCD ca CD CD CD w MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. ZBA-25-99 Hearing Date: August 26, 1999 PETITIONER: Heidi Sibert 407 N. Fairview Avenue Mount Prospect, IL 60056 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 407 N. Fairview Avenue PUBLICATION DATE: August 11, 1999 40URNAL/TOPICS REQUEST: Conditional Use to permit the addition of an unenclosed front porch 25' from the front property line MEEM[BERS PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Elizabeth Luxern Richard Rogers MIEM[BERS ABSENT: Marshall Ponzi Keith Youngquist STAFF MEEM13ERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Jeffery Perkins, Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Heidi Sibert Chairperson Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:54 p.m. The approval of minutes for the previous meeting was postponed due to a lack of quorum. The ZBA heard two other cases. At 9:10 p.m, Cha* erson Juracek introduced Case No. ZBA-25-99, a request for irp a Conditional Use to permit the addition of a covered front porch 25' from the front property line. She then opened inquired the public hearing and mquwed if notice of the case had been given. Mr. Perkins stated that public notice for this case had been given m the form of a newspaper legal ad, a sign posted at the property, and a mailing to property owners in the 250' surrounding area. He then 'introduced the staff memorandum for the item. He stated that the subject property is a home on an 'interior lot on a residential street that is set back 30' from the front lot line and meets the required minimum front setback. The applicant plans to re -roof the house and, in conjunction with the re -roof, proposes to add an unenclosed porch along the front df the house. The proposed porch is approximately 5' deep and includes a porch/seating area near the door, a covered walkway from the driveway to the porch, and a landscape area. The petitioner feels that the porch addition would improve the functionality of the house by creating a covered walkway from the driveway to the front door and improve the home's appearance. Mr. Perkins then discussed the proposed Conditional Use with regard to the Zoning Code Standards. He stated that . the proposed porch enhances the ei existing home, is a Conditional Use n the RA district, and meets all other zoning requirements. He added that the proposal would have no negative impact on the adjacent area, utility provision or public streets, would not affect the essential character of the neighborhood, or have any significant effect on the public welfare. Zoning Board of Appeals Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Mr. Perkins then informed the IBA that the Village Board's decision is final for this case and gave staff s recommendation that the ZBA make a recommendation of approval of the proposed Conditional Use, based on positive findings regarding the Zoning Ordinance's Conditional Use standards. Ms. Juracek then asked if the petitioner wanted to speak. Ms. Heidi Sibert was sworn in. She stated that she needed to put a new roof on her house and wanted to put a 5' porch on the house at the same time. At present there is no overhang and, during bad weather it is very uncomfortable for people waiting to enter the house. She is experiencing, water damage to the interior and the extended roofline should alleviate that problem, also. Ms. Juracek asked the petitioner about the existing evergreen in the front yard. The applicant indicated that the tree would remain, Ms. Juracek complimented the petitioner on the drawings of the proposed addition. She informed the petitioner that, if the addition were approved, it would not be possible to enclose the porch later, and no expansion of living space would be *included in the approval. Ms. Sibert stated she understood those conditions. Ronald Cassidy made a motion to approve the request for a Conditional Use for the construction of ah uncovered front porch encroaching 5 feet into the front setback, seconded by Richard Rogers. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cassidy, Floros, Luxem., Rogers, Juracek Motion approved 5-0. The ZBA heard one additional case. Richard Rogers then made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Elizabeth Luxem. The motion was approved by voice vote. Meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary Jeff %%VMV0WEP=0MDF.MEMKNG\ZDA28A 1999\MInutes\Z8A-25-" Sibutdoc 411" VILLAGE OF MOUNTPROSPECT Community Development Department �� M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 1999 SUBJECT: ZBA-27-99 TEXT AMENDMENTS TO ADD DAY CARE CENTER AS CONDITIONAL USES IN THE B-3, B-4, AND B-5 ZONING DISTRICTS. The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve Text amendments to Zoning Code Sections 14.1703 B-3 Community Shopping Zoning District, 14.1803 B-4 Corridor Commercial Zoning District, and 14.1904 B-5 Central Commercial Zoning District. The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request at their August 26, 1999 meeting. The proposed text amendments will add Day Care Centers to the list of Conditional Uses in each of the districts. The Zoning Code currently lists day care centers as Conditional Uses in the B-1 Business Office and B-2 Neighborhood Commercial districts, but not the B-3, B-4, or B-5 districts. There are several day care centers currently existing in the B-3 and B-5 districts having little or no impact on nearby properties and they are Conditional Uses in the less intense B-1 and B-2 districts. Based on those facts, day care centers can be considered an appropriate Conditional Use in the B-3, B-4. and B-5 districts. The Zoning Code currently includes a definition for Day Care Centers. The Zoning Board of Appeals briefly discussed the reasons for the proposed Text Amendments and voted 5-0 to recommend ap W of the proposed Text Amendments, Case No. ZBA-27-99. Willi"W'A J. Cooney Jr., AICP IJP H:\GEN\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA 1999\MEJ Memos\ZBA-27-99 (DAY CARE text wnendment).doc VILLAGE OF'MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department M E M 0 R A N D U M ........................ TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM JEFF PERKINS, PLANNER DATE: AUGUST 20, 1999 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 26,1999 SUBJECT: ZBA-27-99 TEXT AMENDMENT TO MODIFY REGULATIONS REGARDING DAY CARE CENTERS IN COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS, PETITIONER. Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 REQUESTED ACTIONS: A. Modify Section 14-1703 B-3 Community Shopping Zoning District Conditional Uses Add: Day Care Centers B. Modify Section 14.1803 B-4 Corridor Commercial Zoning District Conditional Uses Add: Day Care Centers C. Modify Section 14.1904 B-5 Central Commercial Zoning District Conditional Uses Add: Day Care Centers ANALYSIS low V Planning Division staff was recently contacted by a resident wishing to establish a day care center in the downtown area. A review of the Zoning Code indicated that day care centers are Conditional Uses in the B- I Business Office and B-2 Neighborhood Commercial districts, but not the B-3 Community Shopping, B-4 Corridor Commercial, or B-5 Central Commercial districts. There are several day care centers currently existing in the B-3 and B-5 districts having little or no impact on nearby properties and they are Conditional Uses in the less intense B-1 and B-2 districts. Based on those facts, day care centers can be considered an appropriate Conditional Use in the B-3, B-4, and B-5 districts. The Zoning Code currently includes a definition for Day Care Centers. Section 14.203.D.8.b lists standards for the Board to consider for Text Amendments to the Zoning.. Code. The standards relate to: ZBA 27-99 Day Care Centers as Cononal Uses in B-3, B-4, and B-5 Meeting of August 26, 1999 Page 2 L3 the general applicability of the amendment to the community, rather than an individual parcel; L3 consistency of the amendment with objectives of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan; L3 the degree to which the amendment would create non -conformity; * the degree to which the amendment would make the Zoning Code more permissive; and * consistency of the amendment with Village policy as established by previous rulings. Based on the above analysis, the ZBA can make positive findings with respect to the standards for Text Amendments in Section 14.203.D.8.b. Therefore, Staff recommends MW, idoval of the proposed Text Amendment. I Concur, William I Cooney, Jr., AICP Director of Community Development MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF "PEALS IBA CASE NO. ZBA-27-99 PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: Hearing Date-, August 26, 1999 Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson St. Mount Prospect, IL 60056 August 11, 1999 JOURNAVTOPICS :REQUEST* Text amendments to Zoning Code Sections 14.1703 8-3 Community Shopping Zoning District, 14.1803 B-4 Corridor Cominercial Zoning District, and 14.1904 B-5 Central Commercial Zoning District to add Day Care Centers as Conditional Uses. MEMBERS PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Elizabeth Luxem Richard Rogers Marshall Ponzi Keith'Youngquist STAFF MEMEBERS PRESENT: Michael Blue, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development I Jeffery Perkins, Planner Chairperson Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:54 p.m. The approval of minutes for the previous meeting was postponed due to a lack of quorum. After hearing three previous cases scheduled for this meeting, Chairperson Juracek announced the postponement of Case No. ZBA-26-99 to the September 23, 1999 meeting. Ms. Juracek then introduced Case No. IBA -27-99, a request fof Text Amendments. Ms. Juracek opened the public hearing and inquired if notice of the case had been given. Mr. Jeff Perkins, Planner, introduced the staff memorandum for the item and reported that public notice for this case had been given in the form of a newspaper legal ad. He stated that Planning Division staff was recently contacted by a resident wishing to establish a day care center in the downtown area. A review of the Zoning Code indicated that day care centers are Conditional Uses in the B-1 Business Office and B-2 Neighborhood Commercial districts, but not the B-3 Commu n-ity Shopping, B-4 Corridor CommerciaL or B-5 Central Commercial districts. There are several day care centers currently existing in the B-3 and B-5 districts having little or no impact on nearby properties and they are Conditional Uses in the less intense B-1 and B-2 districts. Based on those facts., day care centers can be considered an appropriate Conditional Use in the B-3, B-4, and B-5 districts. The Zoning Code currently includes a definition for Day Care Centers.. Mr. Perkins .then reviewed the proposed amendment with respect to the S'tandards for Text Amendments in Zoning Code Section 14.203.D.8.b and gave the Staff recommendation of approval of the proposed Text Amendments, based on positive findings with respect to those Standards, Chairperson Juracek closed the public hearing at 9:15. Board members inquired if this amendment would affect the new downtown area. Mr. Perkins said, yes, it would include properties near to the train station and new condominium develoipments,. Zoning Board of Appeals IBA -1 6-99 Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Page 2 Board members discussed the proposed amendments. Ms. Luxem pointed out there was an ever increasing need for day care and Ms. Juracek asked if elder care would be included in the amendment. Mr.Perkins said it was included. Mr. Cassidy said the DCFS becomes involved in all state licensing for day care. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve the requested Text Amendments to Zoning Code Sections 14.1703, 14.1803, and 14.1904. Elizabeth Luxem seconded the motion. QTJ UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Cassidy, Floros, Luxem, Rogers, Juracek Motion was approved 5-0. Ms. Juracek stated the Village Board's decision would be final for the Text Amendment. Ronald Cassidy announced this would be his last ZBA meeting. Board members thanked him for his many years of service and wished him well in future endeavors. # 6 Richard Rogers,then, made, annotiontoadjou m, seconded.by Eflzabel h,Luxem, The motr,,ion was approved byvoicic vote. Meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Barbara Swiatek, Planning Secretary r H:WdNWLNG\ZBA%ZBA 1999\Minutes\ZBA-27-99 Text ameadmentdoe MAINTAIN Mount Prospect Public Works Department (Re INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MM My UM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS T44 FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER 99, DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 p. SUBJECT: APRIL SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION NEW SAFETY COMMISSION POLICY The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to approve adoption of the new Safety Commission Policy., At the request of the Village Board, the Engineering Staff has evaluated the policy of reviewing traffic -related issues by the Safety Commission. The current policy requires a resident to request in writing an item to be heard by the Safety Commission. Once the request is received by the Village, the Engineering Staff. is required to study, provide its recommendation and present the item to the Safety Commission. All items, including those denied by the Safety Commission, are also presented to the Village Board for final decision. This policy can lead to unwarranted requests to be studied by the Engineering Staff and heard by both the Safety Commission and Village Board. The Engineering Staff believes the new policy will improve the process of handling traffic -related requests by: V I . Allowing Staff to determine the appropriate course of action. 2. Involving and educating the residents. 3. Reducing the number of unwarranted issues the Village Board and Safety Commission must review. A request will still be required to be in writing. The Engineering Staff will perform an initial review to determine whether the request may be warranted and different options to address the request. If It is determined the request may be warranted, the requester will be required to solicit signatures from nearby residents to show support for the request. The Engineering Staff will then perform a traffic study and present the recommendation to the Safety Commission. Should the request be approved, the item will be presented to the Village Board for a final decision. Shbuld the request be denied, the Village Board will ' not hear the request unless requested by the requestor and agreed,,,, t6" -by ­thb'­ Village, Bo' Mr/0"" By a vote of 7-0, the Safety Commission recommends to approve adoption of the new Safety Commission Policy. Please include this item on the September 7th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting and a copy of the Policy for Reviewing Traffid-Related Issues by the Mount Prospect Safety Commission for your reference. 4 Matthew P. Lawd,06 cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:\f'ilcs\engineer\trafflc\safeconun\recs&rnin\&0199rec-doe Director Glen F. Andler M'AINTAIN Water/Sewer Superintendent Roderick T O'Donovan Deputy Director Streets/Buildings Superintendent Sean P Dorsey Paul C, Sures Village Engineer Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Jeffrey A. Wulbecker Sandra M, Clark Administrative Assistant Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent Dawn L. Wucki James E, Guenther Solid Waste Coordinator M. Lisa Angell Mount Prospect Public works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Phone B47/B70-5B40 Fax B47/253-9377 TOO E347/392-1235 MINUTES OF T MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. rt on Monday, April 12, 1999. ROLL CALL, Present upon roll call-, Chuck Bencic Joan Bjork Nancy Bobikewicz Andy'Mitchell George Steiner Buz Livingston Paul Bures Matt Lawrie Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Police Department Fire Department Public Works Public Works/Engineering Division Absent: Lee Beenig Chairman Phyllis Moliere Commissioner Others in Attendance: Jeff Wulbecker — Village Engineer FA 99 - . .... . ....... Commissioner Bencic, seconded by Commissioner Bobikewicz, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Safety Commission held on December 14, 1998. The minutes were approved by a vote of 7-0. 141111VIA �,i —go No citizens came forth at this time to discuss any topics that were not on the current agenda. OLD BU�INESS I No old business was discussed,, I Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink A) New Safety Commission Policy 1) Background Information Per the direction of the Village Board, the Engineering Staff was given the assignment of reviewing the process for studying Safety Commission items. Based on this directive, the Engineering Staff has developed a new policy for handling traffic -related requests. The purpose of the new policy is to provide a procedure for the Engineering Staff to determine the appropriate process of addressing a traffic -related request that may lead to a review by the Safety Commission or denying the request before reaching the Safety Commission. The current Pofi,CY'requtres the request be made, in "W"n'g." A single person may, makethe request. The requestor is asked, but not required, to be present at the Safety Corrimission meeting. Surveys are sent to the neighboring residents asking if they are in favor of the request and also inviting them to the Safety Commission meeting. Often times, the survey may show support for the request but the Safety Commission and Village Board denies the request. At the Safety Commission, the traffic study is presented and discussed, residents are given the opportunity to speak and the Commissioners vote to recommend approval or denial of the request, The Safety Commission's recommendation, regardless of whether to approve or deny, is forwarded to the Village Board. The Village Board then hears the recommendation and puts the request to a vote. If the request is approved, the Engineering Staff will prepare the ordinance and will be read at the next scheduled Village Board meeting. A second reading is required prior to n final approval. Requests that would result in a change to Chapter 18 of the Village Code (Traffic) are reviewed by the Safety Commission. The Engineering Staff does not have the authority to deny a request before reaching the Safety Commission which results in unwarranted items to be reviewed by the Safety Commission and Village Board. The Village receives many different types of traffic -related requests and the new policy provides a process for each of the major categories. Each request will involve an initial review by the Engineering Staff to determine whether the request may be warranted and different options to address the request. If, during this initial screening, the Engineering Staff determines the request is not warranted, a letter will be sent to the requestor with the findings. Should the request possibly be warranted, the requestor will be required to solicit signatures of the residents that would be directly affected by the change. In order to assist in this process, the Engineering Staff has developed a survey form for the requestor. With a sufficient number of signatures in the notification area asking for consideration of the request, the Engineering Staff will then perform a traffic study. Letters will be sent to the residents inviting them to the Safety Commission on and also requesting any insight they could provide on the issue at hand. By doing this, ki meeting. A second reading of the ordinance will be done at the next scheduled Village Board meeting for final approval. Should the Safety Commission not recommend the request, the Village Board will be notified by the Engineering Staff of the decision in writing. A vote will not be'made on the subject. The item will not be presented to the Village Board unless the requestor requests in writing to the Village Board that the item be discussed and the Village Board agrees to hear the request or a Trustee requests the item be discussed at this level. Who may make a traffic -related request? A request may be made by a Village of Mount Prospect resident, a Village employee or a group such as a business, school, church or park district located in the Village. The request may be addressed to the Village Board, Safety Commission or a Village employee but should be forwarded to the Engineering Staff for processing. Groups such as businesses, schools, churches and park districts often create traffic -related problems during certain periods of the day, week or year. Representatives from the group will be required to meet with the Engineering Staff to identify the problem and determine the appropriate course of action. 0 The Engm"eenng Staff often receives traffic -related requests that do not affect a change to Chapter 18 of the Village Code. These issues 'include school signs, street signs, pedestrian signs, speed limit signs, crosswalks, etc. These types of requests will still be processed, studied and resolved by the Engineering Staff. All requests that involve the Illinois Department of Transportation, Cook County Highway Department or other agency will be forwarded on unless the request, would affect a change to Chapter 18 of the Village Code. Should the request involve a review by the Village Board, any 1 -0 decision vni '11 be forwarded to the appropti ate agency with jurisdiction. Any other traffic -related requests not identified in. this policy will be reviewed by the Engineering Staff to determine the appropriate course of action. Discussiou Project Engineer ;matt Lawrie explained to the Commissioners the process of developing the new policy. In order to eliminate unwarranted items to be reviewed by the Safety Commission and Village Board, the policy allows the Engineering Staff to determine the appropriate course of action on traffic -related requests. Therefore, requests will not automatically go before the Safety Commission and Village Board,, Project Engineer Lawrie then provided an overview of the ,policy for Reviewing Traffic -Related Issues by the Village of Mount Prospect Safety Commission. Both the current policy and proposed new policy were presented. Also, the policies of the surrounding communities 11 including Arlington Heights, Des Plaines, Elk Grove and Prospect Heights were also presented. It was highlighted that although the surrounding communities do not have a Safety Commission and Staff handles all requests, the Safety Commission provides an informal setting for residents to discuss their requests. The Engineering Staff hopes that residents will be involved and educated on the process of reviewing the requests. 0 Commissioner Bobikewicz asked how will the requester know what signatures are necessary as part of the survey. Project Engineer Lawrie explained that the requester would be provided a survey form and map showing the addresses within the notification area. Commissioner Bjo'rk asked if the request would be written on the survey form by Village Staff since the requester could put something different other than what was previously discussed. Project Engineer Lawrie explained that it was decided that the requester would actually write in the request on the survey form. Village Engineer Wulbecker added that Staff didn't want the requester to feel pushed into a specific request 'if itis riot the outcome he/she wanted. Ultimately, it is the resident's request and the Staff will provi'de, its, reeon mendation. Commissioner Mitchell asked how residents of the neighborhood would be notified of an upcoming Safety Commission meeting. Project Engineer Lawrie explained that notification signs would be placed in the area that would be affected by the request letting people know of the time I and date of the meeting and if they had any questions to contact Engineering. Commissioner Bobikewicz asked if the Safety Commission would be the final authority if a request was denied by the Commission. Project Engineer Lawrie explained that there is an appeal process established in the new policy. The Village Board can hear the item should the requester ask in writing to the Board that the item be heard. Should the requester choose to not pursue the issue, the Safety Commission's decision will be the final one. Commissioner Bobikewicz then questioned whether the Safety Commission should exist since the process is long and eliminating this step would reduce the time. It would save time for the Engoineerring Staff to directly report to the Village Board. Project Eng" eer Lawrie believes that in the Safety Commiss' A fission meetings provide an informal setting for T si , en to discuss their concerns. The Commission members are also given the opportunity to educate the residents during the meeting. The meeting allows the residents to have all their questions answered and gives them a better understanding of the decision process. Commissioner Bobikewi*cz wondered if residents are going to be intimidated by having to go through this process in order forthe Village, to review 2, request. Project Engineer Lawrie stated that the Village wa,,nts resi*,d,dn,,tsto'part,,ic,lipate , "in thtsprocess andthis policy provides that. Also, an 'initial screening will be done by the En Staff which would involve 'inspecting" the sile. and reviemn"ng, records. If the Engineering Staff supports perfbn,,ni'n,g A study", requinng signatures Will get the neighborhood involved in the request. Commissioner Bobikewicz wanted to know what guidelines would be followed when a request is sent to the Village. Project Elngineer Lawrie explained that an initial screening would be done to - determine the different alt ematives, to the, solull'on. Also, Staff including the Public Works - , Dlirecto,r, Publi"C''Works Deputy Director, Village, "En gineer en and streets Sup 'ntendent W are, also involved the rewe , process.1 Village Engineer Wulbedker exp,la�''meldtb,,i�t,,,gu.,idel,,"mes establi""shedi'n the'Villi, ge Code, as well as national requirements will, be Hlowed, in therevi'ew process. The new policy and the flow charts also establish guidelines as to how a request will be handled. Commissioner Bencic stated that in addition to reviewing traffic -related requests, the Safety Commission also addresses air and water pollution concerns per the Village Code. He asked if the Commission would now be limited to reviewing traffic -related items only. Project Engineer Lawrie responded by saying Staff wasn't looking to rewrite the Code but establish a policy for traffic -related items since they make up a majority, if not all, the requests. Commissioner Bencic requested that the policy specifically state that a minimum of 50% of signatures are needed in the notification area in order for Staff to perform a study. Commissioner Bencic expressed a concern that should the Safety Commission deny a request and it not go before the Village Board, the Safety Commission now becomes a final decision body rather than a recommending body. He questioned whether there would now be an added liability on the Safety Commission's part and asked that the Village Attorney be contacted on this subj ect. Commissioner Bobikevn'cz again questioned the need for a Safety Commission with the possibility of added liability. Project Engineer Lawrie stated that the Safety Commission provides an opportunity to have an informative discussion on the residents' concerns. Mr. Bures rovi stated that With the Safety Commission made up of residents, decisions are not made by government employees or officials only. Commissioner Bencic expressed a concern that should the Engineering Staff deny a request to be studied, the resident could appeal to the Village Board and bypass the Safety Commission. Project Engineer Lawrie explained that there would not be an appeal process if the request were denied by the Engineering Staff. The Village Board will hear an appeal if the request has been denied by the Safety Commission. Village Engineer Wulbecker stated that should a resident appeal to the Village Board after being denied by the Engineering Staff, the Board would instruct the Safety Commission to review the request. Discussion followed on the issue of liability on the Safety Commission's part if the requester chooses to not appeal a decision to the Village Board. Project Engineer Lawrie said that he would contact the Village Attorney on this matter. If the policy added no additional liability, the new policy would then be presented to the Village Board in May. If there would be additional liability, the new policy would have to be reevaluated and then presented back to the Safety Conunission for discussion. Co ssioner Bencic, seconded by Mr. Bures, moved to approve adoption of the new Safety Commission Policy subject to the Village Attorney verifying no additional personal liability on the Safety Commission should an item not be heard by the Village Board after denial by the Safety Commissio . * The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Project Engineer Lawrie provided an update on the Aspen Drive one-way designation issue', After meeting with members of the Village Board, Parent Teacher Organization, School Board, Robert Frost Elementary School, Police Department, Public Works and neighborhood residents, the Village Board is expected to make a final decision on this issue in the near future. If the school decides to participate in traffic control during the pick-up / drop-off times, the Village Board is expected to restrict the one-way designation only during specific times of the day. Otherwise, the one-way, all-time designation will remain in effect. 5 With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 7-0 to adjourn at 8:35 p.m. 0 upon the motion of Commissioner Biork. Commissioner Bobikewic;t seconded the motion. Respectfully submitted, Matthew P. La Proje'o't'En' ineer x:\filekn,gl*nccr\safecomm\traffic\recs&Mn\april99miti.doc 6 DirectorA 77M 7 M. M=.. X Water/Sewer Superintendent Glen R, Andler A MAINTAIN '*f Roderick T O'Donovan SL Deputy Director 1W Streets/Buildings Superintendent Sean P Dorsey M Paul C, Bures Village Engineer Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Jeffrey A. Wulbecker Sandra M. Clark 0 Administrative Assistant Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent Dawn L., Wucki James E, Guenther Solid Waste Coordinator M, Lisa Angell Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 80056-2229 Phone 847/870-5540 Fax e47/253-9377 TDD B47/392-1235 POLICY FOP, REVIEwiNs TRAFFIC -RELATED ISSUES BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION I pig �_T;4 Purpose of the Safety Commission * * * 0 *,** W. ff�** W - 1 Purpose of the New Policy ................. �. _," - "'. 1 Current Poli ------ 1, 2 icy� -------------------------------- ._._-____-_____.._____-__--___- _._-___----___. Policy. ..................................................... 2,3 Policies of Other 3,4 Final Comments 1. 1.4 Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink Director Glen R. Andler, Deputy Director Sean P Dorsey Village Engineer Jeffrey A, Wulbecker Administrative Assistant Dawn L. Wucki Solid Waste Coordinator K Lisa Angell Water/Sewer Superintendent Roderick T O'Donovan Streets/Buildings Superintendent Paul C, Bures Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Sandra M. Clark Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent James E, Guenther Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois B0056-2229 Phone E347/e7O-5640 Fax 847/2E53-9377 TDo e47/392-1235 POLICY FOR REVIEWINs TRAFFIC -RELATED ISSUES SY THE VILLAGE. OF MOUNT PR13SPECT SAFETY COMMISSION MUM# According to Section 5.1003 of the Village Code, "The purpose of this (Safety) Commission is the reduction of accidents, injuries and deaths on all streets, public rights of way and public properties; and also, health hazards such as air pollution, water pollution and such other activities that may be incident to the health and safety of the residents of Mount Prospect, by the best methods of education, engineering, enforcement, legislation and administration." According to Section 5.1004 of the Village Code, one of the duties of the Safety Commission is to "Cooperate with the Village President and Board of Trustees in carrying out a program of safety in the Village." To provide a procedure for the Engineering Staff to determine the appropriate process of addressing a traffic -related request that may lead to a review by the Safety Commission or denying the request before reaching the Safety Commission. As a result, the policy will help to improve the "program of safety in the Village" and affirm the purpose of the Safety Commission. In order for a traffic -related issue to be studied by the Engineering Staff and reviewed by the Safety Commission, the request must be made in writing to the Village. A single person may make the request. The requestor is asked, but not required, to be present at the Safety Commission meeting. Surveys are sent to the neighboring residents asking if they are in favor of the request and also inviting them to the Safety Commission meeting. Often times, the survey may show support for the request but the Safety Commission and Village Board denies the request. At the Safety Commission, the traffic study is presented and discussed, residents are given the opportunity to speak and the Commissioners vote to recommend approval or denial of the request. The Safety Commission's recommendation, regardless of whether to approve or deny, is forwarded to the Village Board. The Village Board then hears the recommendation and puts the Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink request to a vote. If the request is approved, the Engineering Staff will prepare the ordinance and will be read at the next scheduled Village Board meeting. A second reading is required prior to final approval. Requests that would result in a change to Chapter 18 of the Village Code (Traffic) are reviewed by the Safety Commission. The Engineering Staff does not have the authority to deny a request before reaching the Safety Commission which results in unwarranted items to be reviewed by the Safety Commission and Village Board. Traffic -related issues not required to be in ordinance form are processed, studied and resolved by the Engineering Staff. The Village receives many different types of traffic related requests and the new policy provides a process for each of the major categories. Each request will involve an initial review by the Engineering Staff to determine whether the request may be warranted and different options to address the request. If, during this initial screening, the Engineering Staff determines the"request is not warranted, a letter will be sent to the requestor with the findings. Should the request possibly be warranted, the requestor will be required to solicit signatures of the residents that would be directly affected by the change. In order to assist in this process, the Engineering Staff has developed a survey form for the requestor. By obtaining a minimum of 50% of the signatures in the notification area asking for consideration of the request, the Engineering Staff will then perform a traffic study. Letters will be sent to the residents inviting them to the Safety Commission meeting and also requesting any *insight they could provide on the issue at hand. By doing this, the residents will be involved in the process and their insight part of the study. Signs providing details of the Safety Commission meeting will also be posted in the area of the request in order to make those people outside the notification area aware of the issue. Should the Safety Commission recommend the request, the Village Board will put the request to a vote. Also, a first reading of the ordinance will be presented to the Village Board at the same meeting. A second reading of the ordinance will be done at the next scheduled Village Board meeting for final approval. Should the Safety Commission not recommend the request, the Village Board will be notified by the Engineering Staff of the decision in writing. A vote will not be made on the subject. The item will not be presented to the Village Board unless the requestor requests in writing to the Village Board that the item be discussed and the Village Board agrees to hear the request or a Trustee requests the item be discussed at this level. The attached flow charts describe the process for studying each of the types of traffic -related issues. The major categories are as follows: Stop Sign Request • Yield Sign Request • Parking Restriction Request Speed Limit Change Request Turn Restriction Request One-way Street Request Who may make a traffic -related request? A request may be made by a Village of Mount Prospect resident, a Village employee or a group such as a business, school, church or park district located in the Village. The request may be addressed to the Village Board, Safety Commission or a Village employee but should be forwarded to the Engineering Staff for processing. Groups such as businesses, schools', churches and park districts often create traffic -related problems during certain periods of the day, week or year. Representatives from the group will be required to meet with the Engineering Staff to identify the problem and determine the appropriate course of action. The Engineering Staff often receives traffic -related requests that do not affect a change to Chapter 18 of the Village Code. These issues include school signs, street signs, pedestrian signs, speed limit signs, crosswalks, etc. These types of requests will still be processed, studied and resolved by the Engineering Staff. All requests that involve the Illinois Department of Transportation, Cook County Highway Department or other agency will be forwarded on unless the request would affect a change to Chapter 18 of the Village Code. Should the request involve a review by the Village Board, any decision will be forwarded to the appropriate agency with jurisdiction. Any other traffic -related requests not identified in this policy will be reviewed by the Engineering Staff to determine the appropriate course of action. Village of Arlington Heights -- All requests must be made in writing. The Engineering Staff will perform an initial screening of the request. If a study is warranted, one will be done. All findings will then be provided to the requestor. A survey is not sent to nearby residents. If the request is supported by the Engineering Staff, a recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for consideration and approval. The Village does not have a Safety Commission. If the request is not supported by the Engineering Staff, no further action will take place. 'Mere is no appeal process. The Village attempts to educate the residents on traffic -related issues using officers of the Community Policing Division of the Police Department. City of Des Plaines -- All requests must be made in writing unless it comes from a City employee or Alderman. The Engineering Staff performs an initial screening to determine if a request may be warranted. Requests are reviewed by a Traffic Advisory Committee which is made up of City employees including the Police Chief, Public Works Director and the City Attorney. If a study is required, one will be done. Surveys will only be sent to the residents on non -safety items such as parking restrictions. All decisions are made at the Staff level. If an Alderman disagrees with the decision, it can be discussed during a City Council meeting. Also, if a decision requires action by the City Council, the item will be presented for ordinance approval. Elk Grove Village — The Engineering Staff is not involved in any traffic -related issues. All requests are forwarded to the Traffic Division of the Police Department. The request can be made in writing or by phone call. The Traffic Division attempts to discourage unwarranted requests through verbal discussions. An initial screening and any necessary traffic study will be done. A survey is not sent to nearby residents. If the request is not warranted, the requestor Will be notified and no C further action will take place. There is no appeal process. If the request is supported by the Traffic Division, a report will be made and the Chief of Police will present a recommendation to the Judicial Planning and Zoning (JPZ) Committee. The Village does not have a Safety Commission. With approval from the JPZ Committee, the request is voted on by the Village Board. City of Prospect Helglits --- All requests must be made in writing to the Mayor or Village Clerk asking for consideration. The request is presented to the Committee of the Whole (COW). The Village does not have a Safety Commission. The COW will vote either to approve the request without a study, direct the Engineering Staff to perform a study or deny the request. If a studied is required, one will be done and then presented to the COW. A survey is not sent to nearby residents. If the request is warranted, the Engineering Staff will present both the recommendation and ordinance. If the COW votes to approve the request, the ordinance is presented for approval. Cam m, ot 1. The Engineering Staff believes the requests should be forwarded to our office to perform an initial screening rather than another department such as the Police Department. This allows those with a traffic background to determine the appropriate course of action. 2. Our residents will be affected by a change to the traffic regulation. Therefore, we believe the residents should be involved during the review process. This allows the residents to be included in the study, informed of the request and hopefully educated about the decision- making process. 3. The Safety Commission is an important part of the process. It gives the residents an informal setting to speak about the request and allows them to have their questions answered and concerns heard by a group of people who understand traffic issues. Ile discussion also provides an opportunity to educate the residents. 4. Based on comments from the other communities, the Engineering Staff believes the newly developed policy improves the process of handling traffic -related requests by allowing Staff to determine the appropriate course of action, involving and educating the residents and .reducing the number of unwarranted issues the Village Board and Safety Commission must review. El Director Glen R. Andler MAtUTA,1N Water/Sewer Superintendent Roderick T O'Donovan Deputy Director Seen P Dorsey Streets/Buildings Superintendent Paul C, Sures Village Engineer Jeffrey A, Wulbecker Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Sandra M. Clark Administrative Assistant Dawn L. Wucki Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent James E. Guenther Solid Waste Coordinator M. Use Angell Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Phone B47/B70-5840 Fax e47/253-9377 TOO B47/392-1235 SAFETY COMMISSION SURVEY FORM Thank you for contacting the Village of Mount Prospect. Please indicate your request on the following lines: In order for the Engineering Staff to perform a traffic study and the Safety Commission to review the request, the person/group making the request must obtain a minimum of signatures from the addresses indicated on the attached area map. Note that only one (1) signature will be counted for each address. The survey form is to be returned to the Public Works Department once the minimum number of signatures have been obtained. Name Address Recycled Paper - Pirinted with Soy Ink MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SAFETY COMMISSION , MOUNT PROSPECT PIJE3I.,.IC WORKS DEPARTMENT i�, 4; 1 0w SAFETY COMMISSION � o p MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SAFETY COMMISSION � MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SAFETY COMMISSION 4" I NO"' ol Alool1voilla(l yn M TT 172 C' nm ff '% I I w w A T Q U A w. I r% r— n ■� rm%■ ■ ■� rr . TTT MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WC3RKs DEPARTMENT SAFETY COMMISSION rrr�rrr � � P h. i P P P wr'i`er 1""i I� r'� rr*rr � 1'r'i �►. � i"'-� �rrrr /"r"� ■ ■ !"""' �.,.y, .� �� � �" MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WC3RKs DEPARTMENT 03 SAFETY COMMISSION �° MAINTAIN Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1 (!50 nM MY USA INTEROFFICE MEMOHANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS 10b * i`(`� FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER tiq DATE: SEPTEMBER It 1999 SUBJECT: JUNE SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION PARKING RESTRICTIONS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to approve installation of No Parking Any Time and No Passing on Shoulder 1 Zvi signs along the west side of-Mllou"nt"'Pr", 0 eco �a,,) between Central Road and Northwest Highway. Mr. James Bornhoeft, 308 S. Mount Prospect Road, is concerned with the os ibili of an ` ' accident happening since motorists cannot safely pass on the shoulder. There is not enough /l , III,) "w"w0"� -room to park a car or truck on the shoulder without obstructing the street traffic. He has personally been hit, while in his car, turning into his driveway. Also, cars ride up on the lawn when passing stopped cars waiting to turn left onto the side streets in Des Plaines. Mount Prospect Road Is under the jurisdiction of the Cook County Highway Department. The County currently has an ordinance that prohibits parking In their right-of-way unless a parking lane exists. A local ordinance Is, however, required for enforcement purposes. The County also supports Installing signs to prevent passing on the shoulder. The County will install all signs upon receipt of a local ordinance and request from the Village. , Tire ruts in the grass area outside the gravel shoulder exists in a number of areas along the west side of the road. Based on observations, there doesn't appear to be adequate space to be able to park on the west side of the road. A portion of the vehicle would either be on the roadway or on the grass. 51 surveys were distributed to those residents that live adjacent to the proposed parking restrictions. 21 surveys were returned to the Village. 6 surveys opposed the proposed parking restrictions. The remaining surveys supported the additional parking restrictions. Installation of No Parking Any Time signs would be appropriate since there is inadequate space to park a vehicle. We do not want any portion of a vehicle parked on the roadway as this creates a risk for an accident. Installation of No Passing on Shoulder signs would reduce the damage to the gravel shoulder and grass areas. - These signs would also help in enforcing the existing law of prohibiting vehicles from leaving the roadway while driving. By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends to approve Installation of No Parking Any Time and No Passing on Shoulder signs along the west side of Mount Prospect Road between Central Road and Northwest Highway, Please include this item on the September 7th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting for your referen Matthew P. Lawrie cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x-.\f'iles\cngineer\traffic\safccoffun\recs&n-dn\june99=.doc MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD REQUEST FOR "NO PARKING ANY TIME" 8c "NO PASSING ON SHOULDER" SIGNS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD BETWEEN CENTRAL ROAD AND NORTHWEST HWY CENTRAL RD MATCHLINE ABOVE ,REA OF REQUEST .REA OF REQUEST MILBURN AV MATCHLINE BELOW11 302 304 .346 306 310 .312 ,314 .316 ,316 i. 320 322 324 LINCOLN ST U CL �If 0 RL CRANBROOK ST TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 SUBJECT: JUNE SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION PARKING RESTRICTIONS ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF COUNCIL TRAIL The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Installation of No Stopping Standing Parking School Days 8am- 4pm signs along the south side of Council Trail between Emerson Street and Elm Street, and between School Street and William Street. Lions Park Elementary School formed a Traffic Review Committee to evaluate the current traffic conditions. The primary concern expressed at the meetings was the congestion along Council Trail, particularly during the drop-off and pick-up times. Vehicles park on both sides of the street in the vicinity of the school which prevents two-way traffic. This causes gridlock and makes it difficult for emergency vehicles to travel on Council Trail. No Stopping Standing Parking School Days Sam — 4pm signs exist along the south side of Council Trail between Elm Street and School Street and along the north side of Council Trail at the west end of the school. Based on observations, there is a continuous flow of traffic during the morning drop-off. Parked vehicles were seen to be primarily along the north side of Council Trail in front of the school. Both sides of the road were being used for dropping -off causing congestion around the school. In the afternoon, congestion appears to be the greatest as parents are parked in their vehicles and waiting for their children. Vehicles were observed to be parked on both sides of the streets in the vicinity of the school. The Fire Department sees a benefit in restricting parking on one side of Council Trail in order to maintain two-way traffic. There would be a delay in response to an emergency if a fire truck or ambulance was traveling on Council Trail and was met with vehicles parked on both sides of the street and opposing traffic blocking the only through lane. Last year, emergency vehicles were confronted with this problem as school was letting out which caused a delay. 22 surveys were distributed to those residents that live adjacent to the proposed parking restrictions. 6 surveys were returned to the Village. 2 surveys opposed the proposed parking restrictions. The remaining 4 surveys supported the additional parking restrictions. Severe congestion and the need for emergency vehicle access were a couple of comments that were written on the surveys. By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends to approve Installation of No Stopping Standing Parking School Days Sam-4pm signs along the south side of Council Trail between Emerson Street and Elm Street, and between School Street and William Street. Please include this 'Item on the September 7th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting for your referen. 4,Teren Matthew P. Lawrie cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:\files\engineer\traffic\safecomm\recs&tnin\june99rcc.doc TRAFFIC STUDY @ LIONS PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXISTING TRAFFIC REGULATIONS JL STOP SIGN JL DO NOT ENTER SCHOOL DAYS 8-9-30AM & 2:30-4PM A. RIGHT TURN ONLY ON SCHOOL DAYS NO PARKING ANY TIME loam= 2HR PARKING 7AM-6PM OW" NO STOPPING STANDING PARKING SCHOOL DAYS 8AM-4PM NO PARKING PICK—UP ZONE 8AM-4PM SCHOOL DAYS U,.ESTED, TR.AFFI'C RE'GULATIONS NO STOPPING STANDING PARKING SCHOOL DAYS 8AM-4PM tit, Tft m TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 SUBJECT: JUNE SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF WILLE STREET AND SHABONEE TRAIL The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to deny Installation of Stop signs at the Intersection of Wille Street and Shabonee Trail, however, approve Installation of 2 -way Yield signs on Wille Street at Shabonee Trail, Mr. John Ozag, 515 S. Wille Street, stated that motorists on Shabonee Trail often treat the road as a thoroughfare and do not yield the right-of-way to motorists on Wille Street since "there are no traffic control signs posted at the intersection. Per the Police Accident Report, four accidents have occurred In the last five years at the intersection. Traffic volume data reveals approximately 1100 vehicles per day enter the intersection (900 on Shabonee Trail and 200 on Wille Street). Recorded speeds show there doesn't appear to be a speeding concern at the intersection. The Engineering Staff sent out surveys per the Notification Policy to the affected residents to collect their opinions and notify them of the December Safety Commission Meeting. A total of 21 surveys were sent out in May of 1999 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion of this request. 14 residents returned the survey to the Village. kmajority of the comments favored either Stop or Yield signs at the intersection. Based on the amount and speed of the traffic as well as the accident history, Stop signs are not warranted at the intersection. However, Yield signs would clarify the right-of-way and police ehforcement would help to reduce the speed. Since a majority of motorists travel on Shabonee Trail, It would be preferable to install Yield signs on the less traveled street. By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends to deny Installation of Stop signs at the intersection of Wille Street and Shabonee Trail. By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends to approve Installation of 2 -way Yield signs on Wille Street at Shabonee Trail. Please include this item on the September 7th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting for your reference. cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:\files\engineer\traffic\safeconun\tecs&n-dn\june99rec.doc I 400 402 404 lu lu - 2 406 c lu G 410 Ll A 412 6 to 414 416 416 420 S", 500 504 5506 E LINCOLN ST L v?rlP%V%JPLL I KL & %wp%lpwl'q%ffL. InL. EXISTING STOP SIGN EXISTING YIELD SIGN WILLE ST / SHABONEE TRL LOCATION MAP W LINCOLN ST to 1 114,00 I 40 t 4100, .......... . . mtz01 4F 0 4013 40,3 402 403 404 40 404 405 40'406 140? 407 404 1448 40 40a, 409 429 4311 408 (A Lai 4111 I 4 W (A I 44 1 410 16- V) 411 433 4M 410 z (L 413 02 z 413 431 439 412 .. . ......... 415 414 3.* j. 4,15, HOORAH 415 441 443 4 4 IR443 .......... ... �"�AMNWWWWW 416 4017 — Vs V) 417 445 447 I � 410 1 41,18 4119 4114 I 419 449 451 L --- 420 411 421 453 455 420 112 423 4 21 422' 4Z2 C4 s - MAU '04"011" W SHA19ONEE TRL '01 'S 01 A 501 tap 5017 1502 502 $04 2 504 "S 04 REQUEST FOR REQUEST ............. .... .. .. .. . . 507 STOP SIGNS ...... ....... 509► - wo 511 . ..... . ......... ...... 511 cr. 5A 3 $'t4 -111�wmw 4- 513 514 sis sts L X.. 5"1 6 517 ...... . . 517 Soo 517 . ............................. ......... U, 0 —7 V) $17' $18, Ci l 5 IS 52$' 5" 519 . ............... . . . . ............ W COUNCIL TRL 601 0 601 600 603 602 603 602 ... . . . ........ L61 z 605 604 (n 605 $04 V) we LAJ —i –J 1 607 606 Sol 608 (A 609 610 lkp; 611 4a 040L CO&OL I 400 402 404 lu lu - 2 406 c lu G 410 Ll A 412 6 to 414 416 416 420 S", 500 504 5506 E LINCOLN ST L v?rlP%V%JPLL I KL & %wp%lpwl'q%ffL. InL. EXISTING STOP SIGN EXISTING YIELD SIGN WILLE ST / SHABONEE TRL LOCATION MAP Director Water/Sewer Superintendent Glen R, Andler Roderick T. O'Donovan Deputy Director Streets/ Buildings Superintendent Sean R Dorsey Paul C. Bures Village Engineer Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Jeffrey A,,, Wulbecker Sandra M,, Clark Administrative Assistant Vehicle/ Equipment SupOilf;,itendent Dawn L, Wucki James E. Guenther, Solid Waste Coordinator V, Lisa Angell m, ount Prospect; PU'bl,*Ic Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 6005B-2229 Phone B47/B70-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 TOD B47/392 -123E5 15 11 e t 110 *K41 a V of I of 0 01 U 1z 10 U 1110M. W X" I The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:35 P.M. on Monday, June 14, 19 9 9 0 Present upon roll call: Chuck Bencic Joan Bjork Phyllis Moliere Georgip Steiner Buz Livingston Paul Bures Matt Lawrie Absent: Lee Beening Nancy Bobikewicz Andy Mitchell Others in Attendance: See Attached List, Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Police Department Fire Department Public Works Public Works/Engineering Division Mr. Bures, seconded by Commissioner Bjork, moved to approve the minutes of the regulaf- meeting of the Safety Commission held on April 12, 1999. The minutes were approved by a vote of 6-0. Pedro Forte, 212 S. Mount Prospect Road, expressed a concern with plow trucks causing damage to the parkway. Also, adjustments need to be made to the stonn sewer grates that were recently installed along Mount Prospect Road. I Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink Otmar Wollner, 412 S. Mount Prospect Road, has lived in his current house for the past eighteen years. He attended a meeting with the County many years ago when it was proposed to install curbs along the west side of Mount Prospect Road. With the possibility of the road becoming four lanes wide, the residents opposed installing curbs. He is also concerned with the parkway damage, Commissioner Bencic recalled the meeting With the County many years ago. He stated that the County has jurisdiction over the road and the Village cannot do any work. Mr. Sures stated that the County will be adjusting the storm sewer grates within the next month and restoring the parkways, Commissioner Bencic reiterated the possibility of the road becoming four lanes with no" parking should the County install curbs and believes not all the residents are in favor of taking that chance. Proj ect Engineer Lawrie explained that the County attempted to remove the parking lane on the Des Plaines side of the road when it was resurfaced a few years ago. However, the City of Des Plaines supported the residents and agreed to pay for the work to the parking lane in order for it to remain. Louis Caviani, 210 S. Mount Prospect Road, is concerned with the amount of traffic and speed on the road. He is also concerned with people parking on the lawn. Commissioner Bencic asked Project Engineer Lawrie to take an inventory of the speed limit signs along Mount Prospect Road and determine if additional signs are necessary, Mr. Caviani also expressed a concern with the owner at 208 S. Mount Prospect Road selling vehicles on his property. The vehicles are parked extremely close to the road. Project Engineer Lawrie stated that the new Safety Tommi ssion Policy, which was approved at April's meeting, has not yet been presented to the Village Board. It is tentatively scheduled to -,,.go before the Village Board the first week in July. A) Request for Parking Restrictions along the West Side of Mount Prospect Road usil I r -AT6 ► The resident who made the request is concerned with the possibility of an accident happening since motorists cannot safely pass on the shoulder. There is not enough room to park a car or truck on the shoulder without obstructing the street traffic. He has personally been hit, while in his car, turning into his driveway. Also, cars ride up on the lawn when passing stopped cars w *ting to tum left onto the side streets in Des Plaines, al K Mount Prospect Road is under the jurisdiction of the Cook County Highway Department. Their office must approve all work, including installation of traffic signs. As part of our study, we asked the County to provide us their comments on this issue. The County currently has an ordinance that prohibits parking in their right-of-way unless a parking lane exists. A local ordinance is, however, required for enforcement purposes. The County will comply with installing signs to prevent passing on the shoulder as this request is not required to be in ordinance form, Mount Prospect Road is an asphalt road that varies in width. Between Central Road and Busse Avenue, two northbound and one southbound lane exist. Curb and gutter exists on both sides of the road. Between Busse Avenue and Cranbrook Street (Des Plaines), one lane exists for both northbound and southbound. Curb and gutter exists on the east side of the road and a gravel shoulder with open ditch system on the west side, Between Cranbrook Street and Northwest Highway, two lanes exist for both northbound and southbound. Curb and gutter exists on both sides of the road. The widths of the lanes are 12' with a 1' wide paved shoulder on the west side of the road between Busse Avenue and Cranbrook Street. The gravel shoulder varies from 2' to 8' wide with a typical width of 4'. An 8' wide parking lane exists along the east side of the road (Des Plaines) from Wisconsi Drive to Cranbrook Street, According to the County, thisparking lane has existed for a long time. When Mount Prospect Road was recently resurfaced, the County attempted to eliminate the parking lane. The City of Des Plaines agreed to pay for the improvements to the parking lane in order to have it remain. Site visits were conducted the weeks of May 24" and May 31 ". Tire ruts in the grass area outside the gravel shoulder exists m' a number of areas along the wrest side of the road. Based on observations, there doesn't appear to be adequate space to be able topark on the west side of the road. A, portion of the vehicle would either be on the roadway or on the grass. - No vehicles, however, were observed to be parked along the west side of road. Also, "vehicles passing on the shoulder appear to damage the grass. :any of the homes M the 200 block have erected barriers and reflectors to prevent damage to their lawns and driveways. No parking and passing on the shoulder signs would help to reduce the damage to lawns and potential for accidents. 'All Some of the comments received from the residents requested widening the road and installing curb and gutter similar to the east side of the road. According to the County, a feasibility study was performed about seven years ago. The projected cost of this project has prevented this work to be done and there are no future plans to do so. Also, a few comments requested restricting left turns onto Wisconsi Drive and Harvard Street during peak times. Doing so will prevent access to the subdivision for southbound traffic and will add traffic to other local streets. Since these streets are in the City of Des Plaines, approval would be necessary from their office. Other options such as road improvements should be pursued as a more permanent solution, 3 One of the concerns of restricting parking is the hardship it may create for those with limited driveway space. Of all the driveways (over forty), only one has a single lane width from the garage to the road with space for two cars. The other driveways have adequate space for more than two vehicles and are at least two lanes wide. On -street parking is available on the east side of the road as well as the side streets such as Busse, Evergreen, Milburn. and Lincoln. Staff Recommendation,4 Installation of 'No Parking Any Time" signs would be appropriate since there is inadequate space to park a vehicle. We do not want any portion of a vehicle parked on the roadway as this creates a risk for an accident. Installation of "No Passing on Shoulder" signs would reduce the damage to the gravel shoulder and grass areas. nese signs would also help in enforcing the existing law of prohibiting vehicles, from leaving the roadway while driving. Installation of signs, however, Will not eliminate the key to the problem of passing on the shoulder. The amount oftraffic on Mount Prospect Road compounded by the fact that there is only one southbound lane results in significant delays when a vehicle waits, to turn left onto the side etr1, lit W1 # eets of Des Plaines. Im.patie "drivers, "ll leavetheroadwAy and go, around the, tumu,,ng vehicle that causes the damage to the grass areas. Even with installation of signs, motorists may choose to disobey the signs that will continue the problem of damaged lawns. A permanent solution, such as widening the road, is necessary. As was stated above, Mount Prospect Road is under the jurisdiction of the Cook County Highway Department. It is the County's responsibility to provide a permanent solution to the issues at hand. On behalf of the Mount Prospect residents along Mount Prospect Road, the V a, il I iage will pass along the residents" comments to the County and formally request that the County provide the Village with a proposed course of action that will be carried out to resolve these traffic issues. In the interim, because of the inadequate space to provide safe parldng, the damage to the gravel shoulder and grass area, the existing County ordinance prohibiting parldng within the right-of- way and the fact the County has no near future plans for any road improvements along this stretch of road, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: No Parking Any Time and No Passing on Shoulder signs be installed along the west side of. Mount Prospect Road between Central Road and Northwest Highway,, 2) Discussion James Bornhoeft, 308 S. Mount Prospect Road, explained how he is upset his lawn being tom up from vehicles passing on the shoulder. He was in an accident while turning into his driveway because of an impatient driver. He was told by the Police Department that a ticket would be thrown out by the court because there are no signs. He doesn't believe there should be parking on the west side of the road. There are side streets that could be used for parking if it is necessary, 4 Commissioner Bencic asked for clarification on the existing ordinance and who enforces. Project Engineer Lawrie explained the County has an existing ordinance that prohibits parking along the west side of Mount Prospect Road. Because of the limitations of patrolling the road, the County looks to the Village for enforcement. In order for the Village to enforce this, a local ordinance needs to be adopted. The County will install the signs, Project Engineer Lawrie provided an overview of the traffic study. First, the County was contacted for their input on this subject. They support the No Parking and No Passing on Shoulder signs. They attempted to eliminate the parking lane on the Des Plaines side a few years ago but met with resistance from the residents. Also, the County looked at adding curbs to the west side of the road but found it to be cost prohibitive. Project Engineer Lawrie observed many tire ruts in the parkway. He pointed out that the shoulder is not wide enough to handle a parked vehicle. Part of the vehicle would either be on the lawn or the roadway. The road handles a lot of traffic and delays to occur when a vehicle is trying to turn left onto a side street. Project Engineer Lawrie presented the findings to the survey sent to the residents. A maj ority of the residents supported the parking restrictions. The Engineering Staff supports these parking restrictions as an interim solution. On behalf of the residents, the Village will request the County to develop a more permanent solution. Commissioner Bencic asked if the signs could be placed along the road as determined by the Village. Project Engineer Lawrie would provide the County with preferred locations of the signs. He believes they would go along with the village. Commissioner BJork, seconded by Commissioner Moliere, moved to approve installation of No Parking Any Time and No Passing on Shoulder signs along the west side of Mount Prospect Road between Central Road and Northwest EUghway and that the Village can determine where to place the signs. The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. B) Request for Parking Restrictions along the South Side of Council Trail icw Ir iTtIti-i't-ag, 10 Lions Park Elementary School formed a Traffic Review Committee to evaluate the current traffic conditions. The committee included teachers, school volunteers, parents, nearby residents, bus drivers, the Police Department and the Public Works 'Department. The primary concern expressed at the meetings was the congestion along Council Trail, particularly during the drop_ off and pick-up times. Vehicles park on both sides of the street in the vicinity of the school which prevents two-way traffic. This causes gridlock and makes it difficult for emergency vehicles to travel on Council Trail, Council Trail is an asphalt road with curb and gutter. It is considered a collector road. The width of the road varies. Between Emerson Street and Elm Street, the width is 26'. Between U Elm Street and William Street, the width is 31'. No Stopping Standing Parking School Days Sam — 4pm signs exist along the south side of Council Trail between Elm Street and School Street and along the north side of Council Trail at the west end of the school. Crosswalks exist across Council Trail at both Elm Street and School Street. Crossing guards are posted at both intersections during the drop-off and pick-up times. Four-way Stop signs exist at the intersections of Coucil Trail and Emerson' Street, and Council Trail and William Street. Two- way Stop signs exist on Maple Street at Council Trail and on Owen Street at Council Trail. A Stop sign exists on Elm Street at Council Trail. Also, during drop-off and pick-up times, School Street between Shabonee Trail and Council Trail is one-way southbound. The school's main parking lot and bus turnaround are off of Council Trail. The smaller parking lot is off of School Street, Site visits were conducted during the weeks of May 20 and May 3 1 ". Visits were done during the peak drop-off and pick-up times. School begins at 9am, lets out at 3:30pm and has kindergarten pick-up/drop-off at noon. In the morning, the drop-off occurs from about :4 am to 9:05am. There is a continuous flow of traffic during this time period. Parked vehicles were seen to be primarily along the north side of Council Trail in front of the school. Both sides of the road were, being"use d, for dr -off causing, congesti"oo, around tlie-,,school.A maj, on,*t,,,,,,, of the school traffic approached from the west on Council Trail. Some parents approaching the school from the west turned south onto Elm Street and School Street to drop-off their children. The school puts out traffic cones on these side streets to a point approximately 100' south of Council Trail in order prevent congestion near the intersection. With a lot of traffic coming from all directions, this also prevents a potential traffic hazard for children exiting vehicles near the intersection. Parents were also observed using School Street north of Council Trail to drop-off their children M* front of the school. In the morning, there didn't appear to be a lot of vehicles parked on the streets. Most of the'parents were observed dropping -off their children and then continuing on. According to the school principal, the drop-offlpick-up time at lunch doesn't cause a traffic problem. The morning kindergarten class ends at noon and the afternoon kindergarten class begins at 1:00pm. Because the drop-off/pick-up times at lunch do not occur at the same time and only involves a small number of students, there is not the congestion observed as is seen in the morning and afternoon, In the afternoon, the pick-up occurs from about 3:25pm to 3:45pm. The congestion appears to be greatest M* the afternoon as parents are parked in their vehicles and waiting for their children. Vehicles were observed to be parked on both sides of Council Trail between School Street and William Street. The north side of Counc I'l Trail between School Street and Maple Street were full of parked vehicles and between Maple Street and Emerson Street there were few vehicles. The west side of School Street north of Council Trail was full of parked vehicles. Also, both sides of Elm Street and School Street south of Council Trail for approximately half the block were full of parked vehicles. The school has two on-site parking lots. The lot on the west side of the school has approximately 60 parking spaces, This lot is usually always fall. It is primarily used by teachers, administrators and volunteers. The lot on the cast side of the school has approximately 10 parking spaces. This lot is closed during the drop-offlpick-up times since the I' graders line- up in this area. Therefore, vehicles park on the west side of School Street even though it is 2 prohibited. This takes up space on School Street for those parents who are attempting to drop- off their children. During the day, the lot is primarily used by parents. It was decided by the Traffic Review Committee to move the I" graders to the opposite side of the school. This will allow the parking lot to be open during the drop-off/pick-up times for temporary parking which, in turn, will free up additional space on the streets. Speaking with the Deputy Fire Chief, John Malcolm, the Fire Department sees a benefit in restricting parking on one side of Council Trail in order to maintain two-way traffic. There would be a delay in response to an emergency if a fire truck or ambulance was traveling on Council Trail and was net With vehicles parked on both sides of the street and opposing traffic, blocking the only through lane. Last year, emergency vehicles were confronted with this problem as school was letting out which caused a delay, 22 surveys were distributed to those residents that live adjacent to the proposed parking restrictions. 6 surveys were returned to the Village. The question that was asked in the survey was, What insight can you provide or experiences can you share that would support or oppose installing "No Stopping, Standing, Parking School Days 8am — fpm " sighs? 2 surveys opposed the proposed parking restrictions. The remaining 4 surveys supported the additional parking restrictions. Severe congestion and the need for emergency vehicle access were a couple of comments that were written on the surveys. A few unique circumstances compound the congestion problem along Council Trail. First, rainy or snowy weather *increases the number of parents' droppig-off/picking-up their children. Second, occasionally there are events at school that requires volunteers. These volunteers often taken up space,-bn the adjacent streets. Finally, a construction project is currently taking place on Berkshire Drive between Maple Street and Elm Street. The road will be closed until September. All of the above situations add to the congestion along Council Tmill, The Traffic Review Committee will be meeting again m the Fall to continue to discuss the traffic situations around the school. Additional im, rov m,ents, may be considered and brought to the Safety Commission M* the future. The proposed parking restrictions on Council Trail will help to reduce the congestion around the school and will allow two-way traffic to be maintained. Selective police enforcement will be requested to assist m this process, In order to alleviate the congestion along Council Tmil and maintain two-way traffic in the vicinity of Lions Park Elementary School, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: No Stopping Standing Parking School Days 8am-4pm signs be installed along the south side of Council Trail between Emerson Street and Elm Street, and between School Street and William Street, 0 7 2) Discussion Patricia Cassidy, Principal of Lions Park Elementary School, explained the congestion along Council Trail because of the school traffic. The school has expanded their building recently and has many parents driving their children to school. There was a minor fire in the school last year and the fire truck had a difficult time reaching school because of the congestion on Council Trail. In order to alleviate the congestion, Ms. Cassidy is requesting no parking or stopping on the south side of Council Trail between Emerson and William. Commissioner Bj 40 Mr. Bures, seconded by Captain Livingston, moved to approve installation of No Stopping Standing Parking School Days Sam -fpm signs along the south side of Council Trail between Emerson Street and Elm Street, and between School Street and William Street. The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0., Mr. Bures stated his support for the all day parking restrictions based on the street maintenance needs. C) Request for Stop Signs at the Intersection of Wille Street and Shabonee Trail Background Information Mr. Ozag, 515 S. Wille Street, stated that motorists on Shabonee Trail often treat the road as a thoroughfare and do not yield the right-of-way to motorists on Wille Street since there are no traffic control signs posted at the intersection. He has witnessed at least four accidents at the intersection over the past ten years. He believes installing Stop signs would discourage motorists from speeding down Shabonee Trail. The Engineering Staff performed a traffic study. The findings are as follows: a) Accidents I A search of the accident reports indicated: Year 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 (May) Number of Accidents 0 0 1 1 2 0 b) Speed Study Representative speed surveys were performed on Wille Street south of Shabonee Trail and on Shabonee Trail west of Wille Street between May 12' and May 10 (see attached data sheets). The average speeds are follows: Northbound Wille 23 mph Southbound Wille 22 mph Eastbound Shabonee 27 mph Westbound Shabonee 23 mph The speed limits on Wille Street and Shabonee Trail are 25 mph. Based on the results, there doesn't appear to be a speeding problem.. C) Traffic Volume Traffic volume data was gathered in May. Based on the results, there are approximately 1100 vehicles per day that enter the intersection. 900 vehicles travel on Shabonee Trail and 200 vehicles on Wille Street. The maximum total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches for any eight hours during a recorded day was 663 d) Survey Results A total of 21 surveys were sent out in May 1999 to collect the residents' comments on this request. 14 surveys were returned to the Village. Attached is a copy of the survey form as well as selective comments from the survey received from the residents. Comments are provided in this study which are relevant and not duplicates of other comments, e) Existing Traffic Control Signs Wille & Lincoln (north) — 2 -way Stop signs on Wille Wille & Council (south) — 2 -way Stop signs on Wille Shabonee & Main (east) — 2 -way Yield sips on Main Shabonee & P m*e (west) — uncontrolled Site Obstructions Based on a field "inspection, no sight obstructions exist at the intersection. TMs determination was based on the guidelines established by the Village Code. Stop signs are warranted when there are five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible of correction by Stop sip *installation in a 12 -month period. Over the past five years, the maximum number of accidents in a 12 -month period at this intersection is three. I Stop signs are warranted when the minimurn traffic volume entering the intersection from all approaches is 500 vehicles/hour for an eight hour period (500 x 8 — 4000 vehicles/8 brs). The - traffic volume at this intersection (663 vehicles/8 hrs) is approximately 17% of the Stop sign - warrant, When the 85 -percentile approach speed of the maor street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum i vehicle volume warrant is 70% of the above requirements. The 85 -percentile approach speed on Shabonee Trail is 32 mph. Stop Signs are not warranted based on the accident history, traffic volurne and speed study at the intersection, 19 Yield Signs: The study has shown Stop signs are not warranted at the intersection. However, it would be appropriate to install Yield signs on the less -traveled street (Wille Street) in order to clarify the right-of-way. The Engineering Staff typically considers a minimum average of one accident per year over the past three years a criterion for Yield sign installation. There have been four accidents over the past three years at the intersection. This may be correctable by installing Yield signs, The traffic volume study shows that 84% of the motorists were travelling on Shabonee Trail. This may cause motorists on Shabonee Trail to perceive they have the right-of-way. Comments from the residents *indicate a speeding problem on Shabonee Trail. Though the speed study doesn't indicate a problem, this comment shows again that motorists on Shabonee Trail may perceive they have the right-of-way. Yield signs generally should not be placed to control the ma 0 or flow of traffic at an intersection. In this case, Yield signs should be installed on Wille Street. Many of the comments received from the residents related excessive speeding on Shabonee Trail. To address this concern, selective police enforcement will be requested to monitor and control the motorists' speed on Shabonee Trail, Staff Recommendation: Because the intersection of Wille Street and Shabonee "Trail does not meet any of the Stop Sign Wan -ants, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: Stop signs at the Intersection of Wille Street and Shabonee Traff be Installed. To clarify the right-of-way at this intersection, 1 %0 bo The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: 2 -way Yield signs on Wille Street at Shabonee Trail be installed, 2) Discussion Mr. Ozag, 515 S. Wille Street, explained how motorists use Shabonee Trail as a through street 1. and those on the side streets mustield before entering, the intersections. He has personally Yi 11 witnessed accidents at the intersection in question. He is not in favor of Yield signs because he feels it will not slow down motorists on Shabonee Trail. He would like to see 4 -way Stop signs. Commissioner Bencic asked if the improvements to Elmhurst Road would have any effect on reducing cut through traffic and speed onShabonee Trail. Project Engineer Lawrie believes the road improvements will have little effect on the amount and speed of vehicles on Shabonee Trail. Project Engineer Lawrie provided an overview of the traffic study. The traffic study included a review of the accident history, a speed study, a volume study, a resident survey and site obstruction study. The resident survey revealed a concern of speed on Shabonee Trail. Support of Stop signs was mixed according to the survey. There were no site obstructions at the intersection using the Village Code guidelines. Project Engineer Lawrie explained the warrants for Stop signs and Yield signs according to national guidelines. The traffic study showed that Stop signs are not warranted but because of the accident history and speed on Shabonee Trail, Yield signs are warranted. Selective police enforcement will be requested to help reduce the speed along Shabonee Trail, Mr. Ozag pointed out that many of the existing Stop signs are probably not warranted with the g idelines. Pr 'ect Engineer Lawrie said that these guidelines have not always been used. ul 01 1 Commissioner Bencic explained that when different parts of the Village were annexed, the existing signs were also incorporated without any changes, Officer Steiner shares in Mr. Ozag's concern of speeding motorists on Shabonee Trail. The Police Department Will be monitoring this area. Mr. Bures, seconded by Commissioner Bjork, moved to deny installation of Stop signs at the intersection of Wille Street at Shabonee Trail, The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Officer Steiner, seconded by Commissioner Bencic, moved to approve installation of Yield signs on Wille Street at Shabonee Trail, The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 6-0, to adjourn at 9,-.00 P.M. upon the motion of Commissioner Biork. Mr. Bures seconded the motion. x:\files\engi'necr\safecon,un\trafric\rccs&n-dn\junc99nu'n.doc Respectfully submitted,, Matthew Pi Lawrie Project Engineer W a . "Ol I i S, Mill oil . . ................... . Fill I ............................. . . .. . . . ..................... . ............... zs.�=SB��' TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 SUBJECT: JULY SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION BOB -O -LINK ROAD The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to deny installation of Stop signs at the intersection of Forest Avenue and Bob -O -Link Road. 11 Mr. Tim Doyle, 624 Bob -O -Link Road, is concerned for the children of the neighborhood. There are no sidewalks in the subdivision. Motorists cut through the subdivision to avoid the Kensington/Rand/Elmhurst intersection. He believes No Thru Traffic signs will eliminate the traffic cutting through the subdivision and Stop signs will cut down on the high rate of speed of motorists on Forest Avenue. Per the Police Accident Report,, zero accidents have occurred in the last five years at the intersection. Traffic volume data reveals approximately 510 vehicles per day enter the intersection (290 on Forest Avenue and 220 on Bob -O -Link Road). Recorded speeds show there does appear to be a slight speeding concern at the intersection. The Engineering Staff sent out surveys per the Notification Policy to the affected residents to collect their opinions and notify them of the December Safety Commission Meeting. A total of 7 surveys were sent out in June of 1999 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion of this request. 2 residents returned the survey to the Village. Both comments favored Stop signs at the intersection. Based on the amount and speed of the traffic as well as the accident history, Stop signs are not warranted at the intersection. Yield signs are warranted when a special problem can be Identified from a traffic study that would be susceptible to correction by use of the Weld sign. The accident history or traffic study does not identify a special problem that would be correctable by Installing Yield signs. By a vote of 5-0, the Safety Commission recommends to deny Installation of Stop signs at the Intersection of Forest Avenue and Bob -O -Link Road, To control the speeding, reduce the cut through traffic and improve the safety,, No Thru Traffic signs will be installed at each of the entrance locations to the subdivision and Children at Play signs installed near the park. Selective police enforcement will take place now and once school resumes at the end of August. The Police Department's radar trailer will also be set up along Forest Avenue to help in reducing the speed. The Engineering Staff will perform a traffic study later this Fall to determine the effect of these measures. Please include this Item on the September 7'h Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting for your referenc,,, Matthe P. Lawrie cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:\files\engineer\traffic\safeconun\recs&nn\july99rec.doc REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS L .z r y4� rr .r KENSINGTON RD o EXISTING STOP SIGN EXISTING YIELD SIGN roRc T / BOB -0 -LINK FOREST / ALBION LOCATION MAP Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM My USA TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 SUBJECT: JULY SAFETY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF FOREST AVENUE AND ALBION LANE The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to deny Installation of Stop signs at the Intersection of Forest Avenue and Albion Lane. Mr. Tim Doyle, 624 Bob -O -Link Road, is concerned for the children of the neighborhood. There are no sidewalks in the subdivision. Motorists cut through the subdivision to avoid the Kensington/Rand/Elmhurst intersection. He believes No Thru Traffic signs will eliminate the traffic cuffing through the subdivision and Stop signs will cut down on the high rate of speed of motorists on Forest Avenue. Per the Police Accident Report, zero accidents have occurred in the last five years at the intersection. Traffic volume data reveals approximately 420 vehicles per day enter the intersection (400 on Forest Avenue and 20 on Albion Lane). Recorded speeds show there does appear to be a speeding concern at the intersection. The Engineering Staff sent out surveys per the Notification Poli to the affected residents to collect their opinions and notify them of the December Safety Commission M,eeting. A total of 8 surveys were sent out in June of 1999 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion of this request. 4 residents returned the survey to the Village. Two comments favored and two opposed Stop signs at the Intersection. Based on the amount and speed of the traffic as well as the accident history, Stop signs are not warranted at the Intersection. Yield signs are warranted when a special problem can be identified from a traffic study that would be susceptible to correction by use of the Yield sign. The accident history or traffic study does not identify a special problem that would be correctable by Installing Yield signs. By a vote of 5-0, the Safety Commission recommends to deny Installation of Stop signs at the Intersection of Forest Avenue and Albion Lane,, To control the speeding, reduce the cut through traffic and improve the safety, No Thru Traffic signs will be installed at each of the entrance locations to the subdivision and Children at Play signs installed near the park. Selective police enforcement will take place now and once school resumes at the end of August. The Police Department's radar trailer will also be set up along Forest Avenue to help in reducing the speed. The Engineering Staff will perform a traffic study later this Fall to determine the effect of these measures. Please include this item on the September 7th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting for your reference. Matthew P L, a, P. "I cc: Village Clerk Velma Lowe x:\files\engineer\tmffic\safeconim\recs&n-dn\july99rec.doc REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS REQUEST FOR STOP SIGNS KENSINGTON RD OL r K EXISTING STOP SIGN EXISTING YIELD SIGN FOREST / BOB -O -LINK FOREST / ALBION LOCATION MAP Director Water rawer Sup0rintendent Glen R, AndlerMAINTAIN Roderick T 0[')vnv,,)�van Deputy Director Streets/Buildings Superintendent Sean P Dorsey Paul C., Bures Village Engineer Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Jeffrey A,,, Wulbecker G Sandra M, Clark Administrative Assistant Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent Dawn L Wucki James E, Guenther Solid Waste Coordinator M. Lisa Angell Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 6005B-2229 Phone B47/870-5640 Fax B47/253-9377 TOD 847/392-1235 MENUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION DRA The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:35 P.M. on Monday, July 12, 1999. Present upon roll call: Chuck Bencic Andy Mitchell Phyllis Moliere Mark Bonner Jeff Wulbecker Matt Lawrie Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Police Department Public Works/Engineering ]division Public Works/Engineering Division Absent: Lee Keening Chairman Joan Bjork Commissioner Nancy Bobikewicz Commissioner Buz Livingston Fire Department Others M" Attendance: See Attached List. AE=YAL0F'NMA=,, Conunissioner Bencic, seconded by Commissioner Moliere, moved to approve the minutes of th6 regular meeting of the Safety Commission held on June 14, 1999. The minutes were approved by a vote of 5-0. No citizens came forth at this time to discuss any topics that were not on the current agenda. I Recycled Paper - Printed with Say Ink A) Request for Stop Signs at the Intersection of Forest Avenue and Bob -O -Link Road 1) Background Information Mr. Tim Doyle, 624 Bob -O -Link Road, is concerned for the children of the neighborhood. There sideways in the subdivision. Motorists cut through the subdivision to avoid the are no si I Kensington/Ran&Elmhurst intersection. He believes Na Thru Trayjic signs will eliminate the traffic cutting through the subdivision and Stop signs will cut down on the high rate of speed of motorists on Forest Avenue. M- t � �� 16 * The Engineering Staff performed a traffic study. The findings are as follows: a) Accidents A search of the accident reports at the intersection 'indicated: Year 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 (June) Number of Accidents 0 0 0 0 0 0 Representative speed surveys were performed on Forest north of Bob -O -Link, Forest south of Bob -O -Link and Bob -O -Link east of Forest between June 9* and June 116. The average speeds are follows: Northbound Forest 27 mph Southbound Forest 21 mph Westbound Bob -O -Link 26 mph The speed limits on Forest Avenue and Bob -O -Link Road are 20 mph. Based on the, results, there does appear to be a slight speeding problem. c) Traffic Volume Traffic volume data was gathered in June. Based on the results, there are approximately 510 vehicles per day that enter the intersection. 286 vehicles travel on Forest Avenue and 224 vehicles on Bob- O -Link Road. The maximum total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches for any eight hours during a recorded day was 295 0 K d) Survey Results A total of 7 surveys were sent out in June 1999 to collect the residents' comments on this request. 2 surveys were returned to the Village. Both surveys favored Stop signs in order to slow down vehicles. e) Existing Traffic Control Signs Traffic control signs adjacent to the intersection are as follows: North: Park —no signs South: Forest & Bunting — uncontrolled East: Bob -O -Link & Prospect Manor — 2 -way Stop signs West: T -intersection — no signs f) Site Obstructions Based on a field inspection, sight obstructions exist at both the northeast and southeast comer of the intersection, This determination was based on the guidelines established by the Village Code. Letters will be sent to the homeowners requesting they trim the bushes that cause the sight obstruction. Should the homeowners not comply, the Village will remove the bushes that are located within the public right-of-way. Stop signs are warranted when there are five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible of correction by Stop sign installation in a 12 -month period. Over the past five years, there have been no reported accidents. Stop signs are wan -anted when the mmI*MUM traffic volume entering the intersection from all approaches is 500 vehicles/hour for an eight hour period (500 x 4000 vehicles/8 hrs). The traffic volume at this intersection (29;5 vehicles/8 hrs) is approximately 7% of the Stop sign warriant, When the 85 -percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the mm*ilnum vehicle volume warrant is 70% of the above requirements. The 85'percentile approach speed on Forest Avenue 'i's 31 mph. Stop si gris are not warranted based on the accident history, traffic volume and speed study at the intersection, Yield Signs: The study has shown Stop signs are not warranted at the intersection. In order for Yield signs to be warranted, a special problem needs to be identified from a traffic study that would be susceptible to correction by use of the Yield sign, k The Engineering Staff typically considers a minimum average of one accident per year over the past three years a criterion for Yield sign installation. There have been zero accidents over the past three years at the intersection. The characteristics of the intersection are unique. It is a T -intersection (no road west of the intersection). To the north, there is a small park. A majority of the traffic is northbound Forest turning east onto Bob -O -Link or westbound Bob -O -Link turning south onto Forest. Therefore, the potential for an accident at the intersection is minimal. Many of the comments received from the residents related excessive speeding on Forest Avenue. To address this concern, selective police enforcement will be requested to monitor and control the motorists' speed on Forest Avenue. No Thru Traffic Signs: Approval of No Thru Traffic signs are not necessary from the Safety Commission. These" signs are not enforceable by the Village Code but should help to deter motorists 'from cutting through the subdivision. The Engineering Staff supports this request. Signs will be placed at each of the entrance points to the subdivision. They will be installed on Forest, Prospect Manor and Elmhurst Avenue off of Kensington as well as on Prospect Manor off of Rand. Staff Recommendation: Because the intersection of Forest Avenue and Bob -( Road does not meet any of the Stop Sign Warrants, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: Stop signs at the intersection of Forest Avenue and Bob -O -Link Road be installed. Because there, doesn't appear to exist a special problem that would be correctable by installing Yield signs, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: Yield signs at the Intersection of Forest Avenue and Bobo -Link Road be. installed. 2) Discussion Anastasia Doyle, 624 Bob-+ -Link Road, explained there are no sidewalks in the subdivision which force residents to have to walk in the street. There is a lot of cut through traffic that speed in the subdivision. Many students from Prospect High School speed on Forest Avenue during the lunch hour. There have been many close calls and Stop signs should be 'installed to prevent an accident. 4 Another resident stated that motorists avoid the Randffilmhurst/Kensington intersection because of the long delays. Also, Forest Avenue has no Stop signs therefore it is a quick cut through. The resident feels Stop signs would disperse the traffic throughout the subdivision since there will no longer be a quick route. Another resident stated that there are many motorists who do not stop at the Stop signs at Bob -O- L ink and Prospect Manor, Project Engineer Lawrie provided an overview of the traffic study that was performed -at the intersection. The notification policy was also explained to the residents. Those homes that are within 200' of the intersection were sent a survey and notified of the meeting. Project Engineer Lawrie discussed the accident history, recorded speed, recorded volume, site obstructions and resident survey results. He also explained the criteria established to determine whether Stop or Yield signs are warranted, Village Engineer Wulbecker explained how Stop signs do not necessarily slow down motorists. The vehicles may slow down or stop at the intersection, however, vehicles will tend to speed up midblock to make up time. As stated by a resident, vehicles now do not always stop at the intersection of Bob -O -Link and Prospect Manor where Stop signs currently exist. Village Engineer Wulbecker questioned whether motorists would obey a new Stop sign and whether a greater danger would be created. The assumption is that Stop signs will increase safety. This is not the case when the signs are not wan -anted. Project Engineer Lawrie continued providing the results of the traffic study. He also explained that Yield signs are not warranted at the intersection. The problem expressed by the residents and detennu"d in the traffic study is the excessive speed along Forest Avenue. Project Engineer Lawrie recommended selective enforcement by the Police Depilturteni ding the morning and evening rush hours as well the lunch hour during school days. Also, No Thru Traffic signs at all entry points to the subdivision may reduce the number of vehicles cutting through the subdivision. Project Engineer Lawrie discussed which addresses were sent surveys. Commissioner Bencic asked if there were any turn restrictions at any of the entry points to the subdivision. Commissioner Mitchell stated there is a restricted left turn from Prospect Manor onto Rand during specific times. A resident noted that motorists often disobey the sign. The to Police Department Will be asked to enforce the turn restriction. A resident asked if Children at Play signs could be *installed near the park. Project Engineer Lawrie said he would support installation of these signs and will look into the appropriate location. A resident asked how the schedule for the police enforcement would be determined. Officer Bonner stated that the Police Department would want input from. the residents to find out the times of the day when the speeding problem occurs. The police will able to patrol the area for a Is penod of time and will eventually have to focus their attention on other parts of the Village. As RJ time lapses and the speeding problem reoccurs, the residents need to call the Police Department again. A resident asked if there are warrants to install a Radar Enforced Speed Limit sip. The Village Engineer said that this issue would be discussed with the Police Chief to see if such a sign could be enforced and would be appropriate, A resident requested setting up the radar trailer at the beginning of the school year to help slow down motorists. The Police Department Will consider using it once school resumes. A resident asked why Forest Avenue was opened up to Kensington Road many years ago, Commissioner Mitchell explained that it was beneficial for the Village's snow plowing operations and the Fire Department would have another access point to the subdivision. Village Engineer Wulbecker agreed with the reasons stated by Commissioner Mitchell. Commissioner Mitchell stated that by opening up both Forest and Elmhurst the traffic is now dispersed throughout the subdivision. A resident asked if turn restrictions could be placed on Kensington to eliminate traffic on Forest during peak travel times. Village Engineer stated that by doing so the traffic would be moved to Prospect Manor and Elmhurst. Project Engineer Lawrie pointed out that restricting turns at all entry points would also prevent the residents of the subdivision from getting to their homes. Commissioner Mitchell said that he has no problem supporting Stop signs even though it doesn't meet the warrants. This is a local issue and supports anything that can be done to reduce the cut through traffic, Officer Bonner stated that it would be very difficult to enforce the No Thru Traffic signs since a patrol car cannot follow every vehicle that enters the subdivision. A resident asked if speed bumps could be installed to slow down motorists. Village Engineer Wulbecker explained that the Village has a policy against *installing speed bumps. ne Village would have a difficult time snow plowing the streets with speed bumps obstructing path. Also, if a vehicle were to have damage done as a result of going over the speeds bumps, regardless if the motorist was speeding, the Village could be held liable for creating an obstruction. The purpose of the road is to provide smooth traffic, Commissioner Moliere noted that a lot of ideas have been discussed and wanted to decide on what 'ideas would be 'lemented. The Commission talked about installing No Thru Traffic and imp Children at Play signs. Also, providing police enforcement and using the radar trailer would be 4 ideas. aeas. All these can be done the Engineering Staff without Safety Commission or Village Board approval, Proj ect Engineer Lawrie summarized these ideas while recommending denial of Stop signs at both intersections that were studied. He stated that Staff supports the ideas discussed during the meeting, Commissioner Mitchell suggested performing another traffic study after school resumes to see if 9 841 the signs and police i1ce enforcement have had any effect. 3 Commissioner Bencic, seconded by Village Engineer Wulbecker, moved to deny installation of Stop signs at the intersection of Forest Avenue and Bob -O -Link Road as well as Forest Avenue and Albion Lane. However, he moved to approve installation of No Thru Traffic and Children at Play signs. Also, he moved to provide selective police enforcement and use of the radar trailer. Finally, he moved to perform another traffic study in the Fall and invite the residents back out if the results show the above recommendations have not slowed down the traffic. The motion was approved by a vote of 5-0. Commissioner Bencic questioned if those homes that have site obstructions have been contacted. Project Engineer Lawrie said no. Commissioner Bencic asked if the En * gmeenn%t Staff would follow up with the homeowners in order to comply with the site obstruction ordinance. q . 00 Project Engineer Lawrie stated that April's and June's Safety Commission recommenoations have not yet been presented to the Village Board. B) Request for Stop Signs at the Intersection of Forest Avenue and Albion Lane 1) Background Information 11 Mr. Tim Doyle, 624 Bob -O -Link Road, is concernea for the children of the neighborhood. There are no sidewalks in the subdivision. Motorists cut through the subdivision to avoid the Kensington/Rand/Elmhurst intersection. He believes No Thin Traffic sips will eliminate the traffic cutting through the subdivision and Stop signs will cut down on the high rate of speed of Motorists on Forest Avenue* The Engineering Staff performed a traffic study. The fm dings are as follows: a) Accidents A search of the accident reports at the intersection "indicated: Year 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 (June) Number of Accidents 0 0 0 0 0 0 b) Speed Study Representative speed surveys were performed on Forest south of Albion and on Albion east of Forest between June 15'h and June 17'h. The average speeds are follows: Northbound Forest 31 mph Southbound Forest 29 mph Westbound Albion 20 mph The speed limits on Forest Avenue and Albion Lane are 20 mph. used on the results, there does appear to be a speeding problem on Forest Avenue, C) Traffic Volume Traffic volume data was gathered in June. used on the results, there are approximately 420 vehicles per day that enter the intersection. 400 vehicles travel on Forest Avenue and 20 vehicles on Albion Lane. The maximum total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches for any eight hours during a recorded day was 270. d) Survey Results A total of 8 surveys were sent out in June 1999 to collect the residents' comments on this request. 4 surveys were returned to the Village. 2 surveys favored and '2 surveys opposed Stop signs, e) Existing Traffic Control Signs Traffic control signs adjacent to the intersection are as follows: 01 North: Forest & Bunting — uncontrolled South: Forest & Larkdale — uncontrolled East,-. Albion & Prospect Manor — uncontrolled West: T -intersection —no signs Existing traffic control signs in the area are shown on the attached map, Site Obstructions Based on a field inspection, sight obstructions exist at both the northeast and southeast comer of the intersection. This determination was based on the guidelines established by the Village Code. Letters will be sent to the homeowners requesting they trim the bushes that cause the sight obstruction. Should the homeowners not comply, the Village will remove the bushes that are located within the public right-of-way,, 0 ,4 10, P 1% Stop signs are warranted when there are five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible of correction by Stop sign installation in a 12 -month period. Over the past five years, there have been no reported accidents. Stop signs are warranted when the minimum traffic volume entering the intersection from all approaches is 500 vehicles/hour for an eight hour period (500 x 8 — 4000 vehicles/8 hrs). The traffic volume at this intersection (270 vehicles/8 hrs) is approximately 7% of the Stop sign warrant. When the 85 -percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicle volume warrant is 70% of the above requirements. The 85 -percentile approach speed on Forest Avenue is 37 mph. Stop signs are not warranted based on the accident history, traffic volume and speed study at the intersection. Yield Signs: The study has shown Stop signs are not warranted at the intersection. In order for Yield signs to be warranted, a special problem needs to be identified from a traffic study that would be susceptible to correction by use of the Yield sign, The Engineering Staff typically considers a minimum average of one accident per year over the past three years a criterion for Yield sign installation. There have been zero accidents over the past three years at the intersection. The characteristics : of the intersection are unique. It is a 'T' -intersection (no road west of the intersection). A majority of the traffic travels on Forest Avenue without turning onto Albion. Only 20 vehicles per day were recorded to approach the intersection on Albion. Since it is a T- intersection, vehicles on Albion slow down before turning onto Forest. Also, Albion is not a cut thru street, therefore, the residents are probably accustomed to approaching the intersection with caution. The potential for an accident at the intersection is minimal. Many of the conments, received from the residents related excessive_ speeding on Forest Avenue. To address this concern, selective police enforcement will be requested to monitor and control the motorists' speed on Forest Avenue, No Thru Traffic Signs Approval of No Thru Traffic signs are not necessary from the Safety Commission. These signs are not enforceable by the Village Code but should help to deter motorists from cutting through the subdivision. The Engineering Staff supports this request. Signs will be placed at each of the entrance points to the subdivision. They will be *installed on Forest, Prospect Manor and Elmhurst Avenue off of Kensington as Drell as on Prospect Manor off of Rand. Staff Recommendation: Sion Reauest Because the intersection of Forest Avenue and Albion Lane does not meet any of the Stop Sign Warrants, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: .ff Stop signs at the intersection of Forest Avenue and Albion. ;Lane be installed. a e Because there doesn't appear to exist a special problem that would be correctable by installing Yield. signs, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: Yield signs at the intersection of Forest Avenue and Albion Dane be installed. 2) Discussion All discussion and Commission decisions have been stated in the previous item.. Adiouent With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 5-0 to adjourn at 8:30 p.m. upon the motion of Commissioner Bencic. Village Engineer Wulbecker seconded the motion. Respeetfullys ubmitted, J, Matthew P. Lawrie Project Engineer :1 ile "Ie irieerlsafec;oltrafri s&min\JuIy99min.doc 10 �. r MOUNT . ..... ------------ - ROPE— .............. . . .... I W -i TO* MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: MICHAEL J. FIGOLAH, FIRE CHIEF DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 SUBJECT: AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT/ARLINGTON HEIGHTS The item on the agenda for the Fire Department is a resolution to revise our automatic aid agreement with the Village of Arlington Heights Fire Department. Our existing agreement allowed for minor modifications, but because of major changes in running schedules for both Fire Departments, it was necessary to draft a new agreement. A copy of the agreement and a map outlining the response areas is attached to this memo. This agreement provides for the exchange of manpower and equipment for emergency incidents. The following is a brief description of mutual and automatic aid and how they both evolved. Mutual Aid Mutual aid is a formal plan that was developed in 1970 to provide assistance to a community when their emergency response capabilities were overwhelmed. The initial plan was to provide fire apparatus and crews to assist a fire department battling a fire that was beyond their capabilities. Over the years this plan has expanded to include ambulance assistance when all of the fire department ambulances are all out on simultaneous incidents or when a mass casualty incident occurs. Mutual aid assistance is also available for Technical Rescue Teams (high-rise & below grade), Scuba Teams, Hazardous Materials Teams, Fire Inspectors, Fire Chiefs and special equipment. Automatic Aid Automatic aid is an enhancement of the mutual aid system. Automatic aid is a predetermined plan for responding apparatus and crews to another community for routine responses. The apparatus from another community responds even if the host community has apparatus crews available in its own stations, but further away. The idea of this plan is to provide the stricken citizen with the fastest response of apparatus and manpower regardless of the name on the side of the vehicle. Rather than responding an engine from our Fire Station #12 to the far north end of the community, a Prospect Heights engine responds. This keeps Engine #12 available for subsequent I calls in Mount Prospect and responds the closest apparatus. The advantage of automatic aid response is that more apparatus and manpower arrive at the emergency quicker. When two fire departments provide each other with automatic aid, the responses must be equal to one another. The intention is to help each other without taking advantage of the other. H:\Archives\September\MF-Arlington Heights Auto -Aid Agreement -Village Manager.doc Mount Prospect Fire Department hm VW! 8/31/99 ORDINANCE NO* AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS li!liij RAND N-0,CAME 11ACD llllIJ,,II1�'kLD ROADS) (IBjARQL lill''111 64 WHEREAS, tHeA territory is not within the corporate limits of any municipality but is contiguous to the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, legal notices'regarding the intention of the Village to annex the territory have been sent to all public bodies required to receive such notice State statute;,and WHEREAS, copies of such notices required to be recorded, if any, have been recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Cook County; and WHEREAS, the territory is completely surrounded by one or more municipalities; and WHEREAS, all documents and other necessary legal requirements are in full compliance with the terms of the annexation agreement and with the statutes of the State of Illinois, specifically Section 7-1-13 of the Illinois Municipal Code, 65 ILCS 517-1-13; a n d WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect that the territory be annexed thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: : The following described territory: Commencing at the intersection of the south right-of-way line of Camp McDonald Road and the northeast right-of-way line of Rand Road; thence southeast along the northeast right-of-way line of Rand Road a distance of approximately 1130 feet to the west line of Old Orchard Country Club Village; thence north along the west line of Old Orchard Country Club Village a distance of 741-94 feet to the south right-of-way line of Camp McDonald Road; thence west along the south right-of-way line of Camp McDonald Road a distance of approximately 850 feet to the point of beginning, I Annexation P. 2/2 being indicated on an accurate map of the annexed territory, which is appended to and made a part of this Ordinance, is hereby annexed to the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois. SEQDQN V 0: The Village Clerk is hereby directed to record with the Cook County .LJ L - Recorder, and to file with the Cook County Clerk, a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the accurate map of the territory annexed appended to the Ordinance. S.E QTI !�NLIHB�,EE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. PASSED and APPROVED this dav of 111991 Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk ■ IBM VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCE DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager FROM: Douglas K Ellsworth, Director of Finance DATE: August 31, 1999 SU13JECT: FUND BALANCE POLICY PURPOSE: To bring forth for Board consideration a revised fiscal policy on fund balance/reserves. BACKGROUND: The Village's current policy is to maintain a General Fund fund balance level equal to 16.5% of current year's expenditures. Of the 16.5%, 1.5% is designated for emergencies and contingencies. The Village's policy is to maintain fund balance levels equal to the next semi-annual interest payment for debt retired with property taxes. For debt retired with tax increment revenues and the home -rule sales tax receipts, the policy is to maintain fund balance equal to one-half the current year's principal and interest payments. DISCUSSION: ended that the General Fund fund balance policy � � bei end to p� We for a 25% e I t was further recommended that this be ua , y, using, a po, ton. it n. o future operating surpluses. It was not accomp S affi any recommended that taxes be increased toprovide for a larger fund balance. The recommendation was made to increase' fund balance due to the Village's great dependency on sales tax and income tax for funding General Fund operations. Sales tax receipts account for 27% of revenues. Income tax receipts account for another 15% of revenues. A downturn in the economy could have a serious impact on General Fund revenues, resulting in difficulty providing existing service levels. Moody's Investors Service has pointed this out in its past several credit reports on the Village. ... .... . I Fund Balance Policy August 31, 1999 Page Two A twenty-five percent reserve level for the General Fund is common fiscal policy. A recent survey of fifteen surrounding communities found that all but one has a policy of twenty-five percent or more. The average actual fund balance of the fifteen communities is over 50%. All of the communities have a higher bond rating than the Village of Mount Prospect. The Board of Trustees at the August I& Committee of the Whole supported the concept of increasing the General Fund fund balance policy to 25%. The Board concurred with the recommendation that the first $400,000 of any future General Fund operating, surpluses be retained in fund balance, with any remainder being transferred to the Capital Improvements Fund. Accompanying this memorandum is a draft resolution and written fund balance/reserve policy. I thought it would be appropriate to have a formal written policy approved by resolution. As the following table shows, the Village is relatively close to the fund balance levels set forth in the policy. Actual Fund Balance Fund Balance per Excess Fund Dec. 31 1998P sed P (PencieLig) General $5 056 327 $62,3422598 $(1286271) Special Revenue Refuse $1167893 $ 789,929 $ 377,964 Motor Fuel Tax 865 766 $ 564,338 $ 301 428 Debt Service Property Tax $ 303,874 $ 80,640 $ 223,234 $ 462,592 $ 611,518 $ (1489926) Flood H.R. Sales $ 739,215 $ 779,345 $ (40,130) Street H.R. Sales $ 524M4 $ 44421501 $ 802133 Enterprise Water & Sewer $2,532,508 $22594)214 $ (61,706) Parkin 9 $ 707118 0 $ 6913o $ 637980 Internal Service Vehicle Replacement $3241210601 $4,14182156 $(1,0052555) Computer Replace. $ 176,308 $ 176,308 $ 0 Risk Management $2101582982 $2$0101)165 $ 148,817 Vehicle Maintenance $ 268 015 $ 26,5244 2,569 Pension Trust Police Pension $28p56010329 $31,000,360 $(2944010031) Fire Pension $30,780,6183 $32029279 $(1249,09WIN Fund Balance Policy August 31, 1999 Page Three The December 31, 1998 fund balance figure shown above for the General Fund has been reduced by $1.3 million, reflecting the equity transfers approved as part of the 1999 Budget. Assuming we continue to see a positive budget variance with revenues and expenditures, the General Fund should be up to the 25% reserve level within three or four years. The Refuse Fund is showing an excess fund balance of $3781000. As part of the 2000 budget process, staff will be recommending the refuse levy remain constant until the fund balance reduced to the desired level. The excess fund balance showing in the Motor Fuel Tax Fund will be depleted over the next few years as part of the budget process. For those debt service funds retired with property taxes, there is a $223,234 excess. Staff intends on recommending an abatement of the levies for the next few years until the desired fund balance level is attained. For those debt service funds funded with TIF revenues or the home rule sales tax, the relatively minor fund balance deficits do not present a major concern, as the bond issues are retiring relatively soon. The Parking Fund is showing a very large fund equity position, compared to the policy guidelines. A large part of the existing fund balance should be earmarked for future parking lot reconstruction. Therefore, the benchmark fund balance level will increase accordingly. 0 The shortfall in ffindbal,ance, in the VehicleReplacement Fund has been resolved with the equity transfer from the General, Fund in 1999',' This fund is fully funded now. The Police and Firefighter Pension Funds are currently under -funded. Future tax levies will be adjusted based upon sound actuarial principles to achieve fully -funded status. RECOAUWENDATION: It is recommended the Board adopt the proposed fund balancetreserve policy as presented. RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A FUND BALANCE/RESERVE POLICY WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect endorses sound financial policies and practices to ensure the continuation of necessary public services; and WHEREAS, it is essential that the Village maintain adequate fund balances and reserves in its various operating funds to provide the capacity to: (1) offset significant economic downturns or revenue shortfalls, (2) provide sufficient cash flow for daily financial needs, (3) maintain or improve the Village's bond rating, and (4) provide funds for unforeseen expenditures related to emergencies; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the previous fund balance/reserve policy no longer meets the Village's needs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: S.E.CTION-ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, have reviewed the attached fund balance/reserve policy for the Village of Mount Prospect and have determined that such policy be established to govern the existence and use of fund balance/reserves. SECTION . .......... TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. 34 FOR ONAM PASSED and APPROVED this day of )1999. 4' Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FISCAL POLICY POLICY SUBJECT: Fund Balance and Fund Reserve Levels POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE: This policy is in effect as of the day of . .... . . .... 1999. POLICY APPLICABLE TO. All Operating Funds GENERAL POLICY. 1.0 Purpose of Reserve Policy 1.1 This policy is established to ensure that the Village has adequate reserves and resources within its various operating funds to provide the capacity to: (1) offset significant economic downturns or revenue shortfalls, (2) provide sufficient cash flow for daily financial needs, (3) maintain or improve the Village's bond rating, and (4) provide funds for unforeseen expenditures related to emergencies. 2.0 Establishing and Maintaining Desired Fund Balance/Reserve Levels 2.1 If a fund's actual fund balance/reserve level is below the desired level set forth in this policy the Village will retain any future annual operating surpluses until such time as the desired reserve level is achieved. In the case of the General Fund, the first $400,000 of any future annual operating surpluses will be retained, with any operating surplus exceeding $400,000 being transferred to the Capital Improvements Fund. 2.2 Once the desired fund balance/reserves level has been attained, any excess reserves or future annual operating surpluses will be used to reduce property taxes or user charges, whichever is appropriate for that fund. In the case of the General Fund, any future annual operating surplus will be transferred to the Capital Improvements Fund. 3.0 Desired Fund Balance/Reser''ve Levels 3.1 For the General Fund, the Village will use its best efforts to maintain a total fund balance level equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the current year's budget (excluding any one-time equity transfers). %0 3.2 For the Refuse and Motor Fuel Tax Funds, the Village will use its best efforts to maintain a total fund balance level equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the current year's budget (excluding any one-time equity transfers). 3.3 For those Debt Service Funds funded through the property tax, the Village will use its best efforts to maintain a total fund balance level equal to the amount of the next semiannual - interest payment. For those Debt Service Funds funded through alternative revenues (tax increment revenues, and home -rule sales) the Village Will use its best efforts to maintain a total fund balance level equal to fifty percent (50%) of the next year's principal and interest expense. 3.4 For the Enterprise Funds, the Village will attempt to maintain a cash and investment balance equal to four months (one-third) of the current year's operating and capital expenditures plus any reserve for capital improvements. 3.5 For the Vehicle Replacement and Computer Replacement Internal Service Funds, the Village will attempt to maintain fund equity at a level which represents a fully funded replacement program given the age and estimated replacement cost of the various assets. For the Risk Management Internal Service Fund, the Village will attempt to maintain fund equity at a level equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the current year's operating budget plus twice the maximum self-insured retention amount for workers compensation and liability claims. For the Vehicle Maintenance Fund, the Village will attempt to maintain fund equity at 25% of the current year's budget. 3.6 For its two Pension Trust Funds, the Village will attempt to attain a fund equity level that represents a fully funded pension plan as determined by an enrolled actuary. When the plans become under -funded or over -funded, the Village's contribution levels Will be adjusted in accordance with current State law and sound actuarial calculations. 4.0 Use of Fund Balance/Reserves 4.1 Fund balance and reserves are to be used or depleted in the following situations: (1) Revenue shortfalls result in an operating deficit. (2) Unforeseen material expenditures arise which cannot be avoided or delayed. Any expenditure of fund balance or reserves must be approved by the Village Board. (3) Excess fund balance/reserves exist and the Village intentionally draws down on the balance to come into compliance with this policy. This personnel policy is hereby approved this day of Gerald L. Farley, Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk r. TO: VILLAGE MANAGER, MICHAEL E. JAI` ONIS FROM: WATER/SEWER SUPERINTENDENT DATE: AUGUST 31, 1999 SUBJ: 1999 SEWER REHABILITATION9 CURED -IN-PLACE PIPE (CIPP) BACKGROUND The current 1999 budget has allocated funding for sanitary sewer rehabilitation. This year staff has evaluated several sewer segments which qualify for rehabilitation. All of these sewer segments are compatible with the CIPP method of rehabilitation. This method has been used extensively throughout Mount Prospects' sewer systems since the early 1980s. The method utilizes a felt tube which is saturated with a synthetic resin. The tube is then inserted into the sewer pipe and cured over a period of six (6) hours with heated water under pressure. This process requires no excavation, minimizes service interruptions, and results in a virtually seamless, structurally sound, pipe within a pipe. Over the years CIPP rehabilitation has become a integral part of our sewer system maintenance program. Areas which have been rehabilitated decades ago using this process are still exhibiting peak hydraulic performance and strength. The areas selected for CIPP rehabilitation is based on considerations such as the area served by the sewer segment, overall pipe segment condition, and any history of flow restrictions which may have resulted in sewer blockages. REQU F OR PROE0.SALS On Tuesday, August 17, 1999, proposals were receive ' d from two (2) of the three (3) qualified CIPP rehabilitation contractors who were sent RFPs. Both of the solicited proposals were from vendors who had previously performed this type of work for the Village. Below please find the results from these proposals: Vendor "Proposal'Price Insitufoarm Technologies, Inc. 'Wo Kenny Construction Company $333 7 Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal, Inc. No Prq osal, ,P DISCUSSION This year's rehabilitation program consists of almost 6,730 lineal feet of 8, 10, and 12 inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) in twelve (12) separate segment areas. These sites include Martha, Myrtle, Audrey, Hatlen, Verde, Bonita, Lynn Ct., Briarwood Dr., Busse Road, George/Edward, and George/Albert Streets. The attached maps denote the project locations. Page 2... 1999 Sewer Rehabilitation, (IPP August 31, 1999 Closed circuit television inspection has revealed that these segments have significant structural defects and potential flow restrictions. Additionally, two of the segments, are located in rearyard easements and are difficult for sewer crews to access and maintain. The use of CIPP rehabilitation will greatly prolong the life of these sewer segments and reduce maintenance demands. This year we have received some very good prices on our project proposals. For comparison, I have gathered the last two year's cost to line sewer pipe using the MPP method. These costs, which appear below, are based on lineal foot and are averaged. 1997: Total Project Cost = $198,100 1998: Total Project Cost = $1012,092 1997 and 1998 CIDP Projects $299,792 1999 Total Project Cost = $236,410 Cost Comparison CIDP Projects 1997 & 1.998 Total Footage = 5,981 Average Cost/Foot = $50.00 Total Footage= 6,730 Average CostlFoot = $40.80 As you can see, if we compare the previous years' pricing with this year's proposal amounts we see a decrease of almost ten dollars per foot based on a cost of $236,410 for the lining of 6,730 feet of pipe at an average cost of $40.80 per foot. ... . ... . RECOMMENDATION I I recommend acre ting the lowest qualified proposal �K'236 �415 it p st, ",ni, -tedb Jajs,:it,.U4 'ort nl Technologies, Inc. of Lemont, Illinois. The Village ha"ad a long and success fulrelattoil, sli,ip with Insitufann Technologies. They have installed C stalled numerous IPP liners throughout the Village over the years and are well qualified for this project. Funding for this project can be found in the current 1999 budget under account number 615510-540777 (275,000) on page 255. The balance of funds in this account will be used to effect point repairs on other sanitary sewer pipe segments (point repairs, or spot relays, are performed when the majority of the defects in a pipe segment can be corrected by simply replacing one -or two lengths of pipe.) �64 - 1 ITTITMO I Concur: Director of Public Works, Glen R. Andler ROD c: Director of Public Works, Glen R. Andler Deputy Director of Public Works, Sean Dorsey file X:\USERS\RODONOVA\WORD\MIKEMEMO\99CIPPr.doc MANHOLES IN UNIT I—S ONLY REVISION By DATE F" CHMK Aw VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAP ELK GROVE TOWNSHIP 11 1—S W.1/2 N.E.1/4 Sec.10-41-11 . nATF, .1W 4r -,Ay. mw I -IR WSS COUNTY 60rss COUNTY . . ...... 2,4! 2-C 2 1 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS 4 3 4 5 r) 5 16 7 a 7 V) 10 10 ... ....................... 12 12 11 14 13 14 >13 0 16 15 16 15 pq 18 17 17 C/) 0 20 19 20r 10 22 21 22 21 ------------- 71 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAP ELK GROVE TOWNSHIP 11 1—S W.1/2 N.E.1/4 Sec.10-41-11 . nATF, .1W 4r -,Ay. mw I -IR MAMIGLES, IN UNIT 2-S ONLY REMSION By DATE - VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAP 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET ELK GROVE TOWNSHIP MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS E.1/2 N.E.1/4 Sec.10-41-11 (27--s) MANHOLES IN UNrr 12—S ONLY 9 No REVISION 13Y DATF, 1 -1 ST WAWV4C 11114 Wa TAB= rj Z. I nmD CHrw gr 1Y.A. 07 23 91 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAP ELK GROVE TOWNSHIP E.1/2 .E.1 /4 Sec. 10-41 —11 I VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAP ELK GROVE TOWNSHIP DAIE-0 JULY 95 DRAWN BY: MW SCALE: 1"'ww WNHOLES IN UNIT 37—S ONLY REVISION '13Y _RA I IST IDRAWNG IND" TANXS 12-77 ........... 'N' to to to 00 o N . . ..... ............. co OID 0, w u 00 r- A 6 04 C4 :zm rol, 29 ON% oi o'.0 0-110 34 0,j� 0.,.o f-ol- e --o e-*' 0-4,0",oe-, ir", .-o e, 0.0, 1, e-0 0-0 oi eoi 0-0, , , eo , e-4 "o 400, 2805 r -o 0--* 00*1 0,0,0-0, 0 100, 000 0-0, "o eo' 1 0-0 ,o 0.0, 2707 00-5 '-o e -i", .0 00, # "o 4-4 ewo .,o e ".0, eo eo 0 e4 0.0 o. -O 0.*o "'o 0-0, e-0 ..o o -of 'Zoe 'o, ow oi 04 led, 0-d' 2809 0-0, ei ol r, "'.0, 0 00-01 4;� oi 0-0 "o ,,,o 0-4 #,# 'r.�j 0i 0-1 0-1 00-0 0-0 e-0 0�00 '.4. '00, r --o � o"o, o'"' .0 f --o 0-0 ".0 0,j� , 0.1.4 � '.0, "d, 2811 o"o, ea" e oi,�* 410j" r.'r f-0, eo, oi le 0-* , 0--o' r., o,,,o ro# P-0 --o 0 .0 ej� 'Poo o. -j moo eo 4od, , ol 0i 0 10-0 e0o 000 1 r.0" e 1-00 0, "eo, 2813 0-W 0, , �, e-0 0-0 *, froo -o "oo, eo 0-0 "�, 0 e-1 0--j 0,0, 00.1, 000 edi 0:�, eo o", 1 0., #,.- 'WOO O.Io# ",#o 01.0 eo 10,00 0,.1 .o .o eo, err , 0i "00� O�j 2815 Amp e, o--#, o 0-0, .o jo"oo 10 O."o 2829 0-0 #-.* "o 0-0, r -o 0-0 eo 0-0, 2819 ,.�# I A 00 .,o e "o 2W,3 eo.#k 9-0 01.0 4 all IT, 0- 0-0, 01 owpo fo� li�# 287.1 e., old, ""ov e-0, 4-0 "j, 0.0i, rok e", r-11 0-0 2834 0--1 , i o-* e-` eo el"' L-1 0-0 0-11 1 O'�o 0-11, r-1 e -lo 'r., 00-1 oi 'o, 0,0 o"o 0,0 0-0 0--" r-4, "i eoo, 0*0' 4-0 0-0, s-.0 0"" *--1 2836 A-1 0-0 oloo "141 *--o doo -o eo 0-�o -- 4:� oi:�i 0"., HHO e --, -o o'i ro, f.0 0-001, x 2837 0-4 r-11 0.0, o,.o -0 0, 0.0 0 0-0 0-10, 1 10. r-0 0 0-0 *",o *,,o 'i o"o #*w 0-10' "k 00-0 e0o I e. -J 0-0, �0-` I o,.o, eloo lr,*o 4, oi� oi .o ?--o o -.J' r -o 28M o--#� "'o, o- e-" e-0 e ,4� eol e-0 w-0 1 .0. . . .. .. .... 2839 ".0 0-0 "'o 0-0 eo, I--, 1�` 0-010 0-0 e-0 0-0, 0( 'w", 01.0 .w 0-0 0-1 r I-0, r-4 ell #-$ 1 0-101, 1 'o, #-0 2840 0-1, 1 e-1 *.'o, -, 05, , "i --o e.,o "o 0., "'o e", 07-0 � * 0 0.,o 01-0 ej, ri�o 1 2841 's ol ..o, 0--o' r -o �o 0-0 eloo e -o "o ..o 2842 OR J 0-0 _0 r -O oi ,-o eo oop co .00 eo, 0-0 'o, 2843 ;r,4') 0.0 1-0, e.0 0-11 01 *00 "o r -O eol 0." *-, - 01-01 1 e--1 , 0 10 "o 0-" .w r "o PARK 7,4 LP A:R :K *,.,, 0."* oi.�s e" 2900 GHARLOT rE RD 4-11 00 0`0# 0-0 2902 1 2901 .0 2903 K1% V? 110 2 2m, V, vf R M02 U 1300+ 1 17 6 Nt 04 S 00�1 U* FT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS - --------------- - - - - - '"', WASTEWATER COLLECTION MAP ELK GROVE "TOWNSHIP W-1/2 N.E.1/4 Sec -22-41-11 37-S r)ATF- Jt 11-Y q5 py.. MW TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER SEPTEMBER 3, 1999 NEWSLETTER PRINTING PROPOSALS B a c,kg r o u n,, d Since 1996, the Village Board has discussed a change in the format of the Village Newsletter. With the creation of the Public Information Officer position, it is now possible to bring production of the Newsletter in-house. At the Committee of the Whole Meeting on August 24, the Village Board was presented with a new Newsletter Design. To accompany the change in design, a Request for Proposals (RFP) for printing services was issued. The RFP for printing was sent to a list of 9 printers, and was displayed on the Village web site. The proposals were due back on August 20. We only received one response to the RFP from A. A. Swift Printing. A.A. Swift is the printer the Village currently utilizes for the printing of the Village newsletter. They have been the printer of the Village newsletter for eleven years, and received a positive endorsement from the Village Clerk, who has worked with them on the current newsletter. The proposal involves the printing and preparation for mailing of the Village Newsletter six times a year. ejo .posalResults PROW NO 0 One proposal was submitted. Prices were requested for 1,2 and 3 color prinlimoptom, The results are as follows: on 12-page layout): Descri tion 11 -color J$' -color Paper $29100.00 $21100.4 $2,100-00 Printing $5,350.00 $6J00-10' $6,850-00 . . .......... .. TOTAL COST PER EDITION $71450-00 $81200.PQ, $81950.00 Per Item Cost $0.30' $0.333,�� $0.36 ANNUAL COST (6 Issues) $44700.001 $49,,200.0013�� " . Discussion Following the Committee of the Whole meeting on August 24, 1999 where the new newsletter design was introduced, the Village Board expressed a desire to print the newsletter in 4 -color. A formal quote from the printer has not been received to date but the estimated cost would be an additional $0.03 per issue. Newsletter Printing Proposal September 3, 1999 Page 2 BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS The current newsletter budget for printing and paper expenses is $52,500. With the proposed revisions to the newsletter the paper costs will be lower (by $5,900), but the printing expenses would be more (by $11,600). In order to print the newsletter in 4 -color, an additional $11,600 will need to be added to the printing line item for the FY2000 Budget. A portion of the $11,600 shortfall could come from the $5,900 in the paper account, leaving a remaining shortfall of $5,700 in the printing account. 2000 PROPOSED PROPOSED BUDGET COMPARISON BUDGET 4 -Color Version DIFFERENCE PAPER $18,500.00 $121600.00 +$5,900.00 (Acct Of 1105-570090) 1 PRINTING $34,000.00 $45,600-00 $111600.00 (Acct 0 11105-54021 P) i.TOTAL $52,500.00,1. $58,200-001 - $51700.00j If the Village Board's decision is to print the newsletter in 4 -colors, I recommend that the Village enter into an agreement with A. A. Swift Printing for services to entail printing 6 editions of the Village Newsletter for an amount not to exceed $58,200. All On Officer c: Mayor Farley & Board of Trustees HAGENftblic InfoNewslefteAPrinter BiMmemoresultdoc NOTICE THE MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1999 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD WAS CANCELLED DUE TO THE LABOR DAY HOLIDAY AND THE MEETING WAS SCHEDULED FOR ITUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7. THAT MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED, ALSO. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING, Dated this 2nd day of September, 1999. HAGEWLNCMPa\SPa IMCANCMIM MAYOR VILLAGE MANAGER Gerald L. Farley Michael E. Janonis TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK Timothy J. Corcoran Velma Lowe Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Daniel A. Nocchi ageof Mount Pro s ` e ct Phone: 847/818-5328 Michaele W. Skowron Fax*, 847/818-5329 Irvana K. Wilks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinoi's 60056 TDD": 847/392-6064 NOTICE THE MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1999 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD WAS CANCELLED DUE TO THE LABOR DAY HOLIDAY AND THE MEETING WAS SCHEDULED FOR ITUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7. THAT MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED, ALSO. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING, Dated this 2nd day of September, 1999. HAGEWLNCMPa\SPa IMCANCMIM Direct©r Glen R. Andler MAINTAIN Wet 'e/S �t r Suplari ndent T. '0 n Deputy Director Sean P Dorsey Streets/Buildings Superintendent Paul C. Bur+es Village EngineerGt� Jeffrey A. Wulbecker Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Sandra M. dark Administrative Assistant" Can L. Wuci Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent James E. Guenther Solid Waste Coordinator M. Lisa Angell Mount Prospect Public Works 1700 W. Central al Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 6005B -222e Rhone one 847/B 70-5B4C Fax B47/253-9377 T OO B47/392-1235 THE SEPTEM13ER 13, 1999 MEETING OF THE SAFETY COMMISSION HAS BEEN CANCELLEDN THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING WILL 8 1 E HELD ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1999 AT 7:30 PaMs AN AGENDA, WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING, DATED THIS 24 TH DAY" OF Au[3v13T, 1 999. Recycled Paper - Printed with Soy Ink