Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0870_001i w 1 DEPUTY VILLAGE CLERK ALL COMMITTEE P THE WHOLE Aa E IN D Meeting Location: Meeting Data and Time,,, Mount; Prospect Senior Center Tuesday, January 27, 1998 50 South Emerson Street 7. I� CALL TO i E - ROLL CALL I! ACCEPTANCE F MINUTES OF JANUARY Y 1 3 1' 111. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IRI, A L. IV. T10, EAD, islon staff f the Public Works Department has beens v t ` t� 1+'s meter shop. The goal oft hi's examination Is of the V Ila a's water diatrihuti , SyStarfn. to,'00he �� , � - g ��usage in its �� L�� V�t operation w," 'alto dg , o u mtr l g�, onlycar the,,' �. r, �t �<<� ��tht� It s�� ParI of �t, MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 13,1998 CALL TO ORD Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Present at the meeting were: Trustees Timothy Corcoran, Paul Hoefert, Richard Lohrstorfer, Daniel Nocchi and Irvaria Wilks. Absent from the meeting was Trustee George Clowes. Staff present included: Village Manager Michael Janonis, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl and Police Chief Ronald Pavlock. 11, ,,MINUTES Minutes of December 23, 1997. Motion made by Trustee Hoefert and Seconde by Trustee Nocch'i to accept the Minutes. Members voted unanimously to acce tWie lflffutes. None* - -- prq� ►ILI Pollce ChIef Ron Pavlock stated that the discussion and revised Ordinance before the Village Board this evening is the result of citizen inquiries concerning door-to- door solicitation after dark. He stated a recent Northwest Municipal Conference survey showed, a wide variation of times which communities allow for solicitation. He stated the Village had originally approved an Ordinance that terminates solicitation at sunset, however, when the cable system was under construction w *thin the I Village, the cable company at that t' I I ime requested the Village rescind *ts night-time prohibition in order to allow the subscriber base to be built up through door-to-door solicitation. He stated that his research has shown that a definition of sunsetis quite varied ant the time of sunset varies widely throughout the year in this area which could caUSE confusion at the time of enforcement. Therefore, he is recommending thE Ordinance include language which requires solicitation to terminate at 6:00p.m. during the winter which 7would be classified as Central'Standard Time from the lasl Sund ay in October to the first Sunday in April. He stated that the time for door-to- door solicitation to be terminated during the summer be classified as Centra Daylight Savings Time from the first Sunday in April to the last Sunday in Octobel to be 8:00 p.m. He stated that there were 59 individuals who had registered witt the Police Department for solicitation purposes. He stated that, unfortunately, thE Village could not require.all zolicitorsIto be Tegistered. Sue Dombrowski, 914 Sumac, stated that she is satisfied with the hours a, defined in the Ordinance and felt that the later solicitation hours during the summe could accommodate numerous non-profit solicitations which are relatively commo during that period of time. General I comments from the Vill,age Board members included the following items: 0 a 1 0 lied, to elected There was a question" regarding whether -these reguiations aDD officials and the circulation of petitions. Activity related to the election process is specifically exempted from this prohibition. Trustees also suggested aIIC0DV of the Ordinance be forwarded to Northwest Central Dispatch so that they might be aware of the solicitation regulations in,the event that citizens call, to complain. Trustees were a,,Iso supportive of having solicitors registe,r.with the Village but acknowledged the fact that such registration could not be enforced. Consensus of the Village Board was to support the Ordinance as drafted which includes the termination of solicitation at 6:00 p.m. during the winter and at 8:00 pm, during the summer as defined by Central Standard Time and Daylight Savings Time, respectively. Village Manager Janonis stated that Trustee Lohrst&fer had requested a separate license for tobacco sales at a previous meeting and research has revealed that such an Ordinance has already been on the books since 1957. He also stated the Ordinance Is being enforced as we speak and there have been a couple of license revocation hearings within the last couple of years. He stated the review that was prompted by the research as requested by Trustee Lohrstorfer has revealed the need to clean up the Ordinance and make it coincide with current State and Federal regulations. N Among the items changed is the prohibition that any person within the Village of Mount Prospect under the age of 18 is prohibited from possessing tobacco products, not just a resident of Mount Prospect, as previously stated in the Ord.inance. He stated that vending machines must be under the direct control of the business owners and the fine has been increased with this Ordinance revision. General comments from Village Board members included the following items: Trustees were generally supportive of the changes and suggested the Ordinance be forwarded to the Youth Commission for input and review in an effort to get the word out to the youth within the community. Chief Pavlock stated that the majority of the violators which the Police deal with tend to be 15-16 year olds and the consensus of the Police personnel is that tobacco is a gateway drug to other types of drugs. He stated that for proper enforcement, there is a need to have a parent accept the ticket on behalf of the minor and last year, there were approximately 30 arrests related to the enforcement of this Ordinance'l, Consensus of the Village Board was to proceed with the draft Ordinance by sending it to the full Village Board for consideration at an upcoming meeting. It was alls64etermined that the Ordinance would be forwarded to the Youth Commission for their information and input, a A Motion was made by Trustee Wilks and Seconded by Trustee Hoefert to move into Closed Session to discuss Property Acquisition and Litigation. The Committee of the-'IT�'hole reconvened at 9.-28 p.m. into open sessionm, 3 Vill, There being no further business discussed, the Committee of the Whole meeting adjourned at 9:29 p-mm "Res,po t ; , DAVID STRAHL Assistant Village Manager IF 'AMRZO(ii !I MAINTAIN 4W Mount Prospect Public Works Department 10 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM Crff USA . . . ............ . ........... . . TO: VILLAGE MANAGER, MICHAEL E., JANONIS FROM: WATER/SEWER SUPERINTENDENT DATE: JANUARY 20, 1998 IN SUBJECT: AUTOMATED METER READ ING UPDATE FINAL RE CObdMENDAT IONS Over the last several years the Water/Sewer Division staff has been exam ' ining the policies and operations of the division' s Meter Shop, Our goal was to define a long term position which will carry us into the next century and beyond. Presently our staffing levels in the Meter Shop are one full time meterperson and a service call person who spends half their time on meter related activities. Some of the duties include replacement of old meters, testing of meters, repair of leaking or stopped meters, high water bill complaints, and general troubleshooting of our Automated Meter Reading, AMR, devices. In addition to our public works employees we also employ the services of an independent contractor, currently HBK Water Meter Service, which handles the majority of our meter installations and testing. This mix of out- sourcing and 'in-house support has up to now been a successful combination . The following is a brief history on where we were and what we presently maintain and operate including AMR experiences. I have made several recommendations for your consideration. These, I believe, are based on realistic and achievable goals which are developed around our current personnel levels and funding resources, I In August of 1991 we placed our f irst AMR device on line. We are presently using two (2) different styles of AMR. Both of them manufactured by Badger Meter Incorporated. One technology uses phone lines to communicate with the Public Works central computer. This device is known as ACCESSplus. The other AMR system uses radio frequency, RF, to communicate with a hand-held interrogator and is known as TRACE. It has been over six (6) years since we began implementing AMR and we have learned a good deal about AMR and gathered substantial information on its performance and applicability through our pilot studies. Some of the reasons Page 2 Water Meter Policy Recommendations January 20, 1998 whichprompted us to go With an automated water meter reading system are inherent in any operation as large as ours. Accessibility was a key issue, especially with our commercial customers. Accountability was also important and again even more s o with our larger commercial customers. Other issues included the data collection times. Simply collecting the meter readings for our commercial (non -Single Family Residences, non-SFRs) customers, which are billed monthly, took weeks. These non -SFR accounts , unlike our Single Family Residential, (SFR) 'accounts , were manually read by Public Works meter readers and recorded by hand in a meter book. Residential customers have been mailing their meter readings in every two (2) months for over the last decade using a "post card" system. The post card system relies on residents to write their water meter reading down on their water bill when returning payment, The average response rate,has been over 95% using this method. This honor system replaced traditional water meter reading personnel. The commercial accounts "were still read by Public Works personnel due to the level of revenues 'involved and the monthly billing cycle. To give you an 'Idea of what the water meter population consists of and our customer base I have made a breakdown of all our service connections and their respective classifications. Mi _616IM-M Taken from report data by Finance* Meters do not have ai n nfinite operating life and periodically must be tested, repaired, or replaced. Professional water supply organizations, such as the American Water Works Association, AWWA, recommend testing of smaller meters every ten years. This standard is in line with our current policy and seems to be a reasonable one. Our intent is to replace ever water meter under two (2) 'Inches on a ten (10) to fifteen (15) year interval. It is generally recognized to be more economical and cost effective to replace meters of this size rather than repair them. Meters 2" and above, 'although purchased by customers, are maintained and serviced by the Water/Sewer Division's 'Meter Shop at the owner's expense. The following table illustrates our testing requirements based on our current meter population. Page 3 Water Meter Policy Recommendations January 20, 1998 TABLE2 Meter t=utwy lestim2u 5 " nieters and above in addition to Inventoty, levels are below: . . . ........... . ..... . . ....... . T ALS M.s TESTING INTERV 6, fit U ............... 4 lla I�RVAL -Mill, 3 YEAR INTERVAL ---- - ---------- 2 YEAR INTERVAL .................... . . . . . . . . ............ 0 WA W."I me Ion 121 a In M Our current funding level facilitates a replacement rate of approximately 500 meters per year utilizing both in-house and contractual services. It is clear that with well over 10,000 single family homes in the Village, the rate of replacement is lagging somewhat behind. At present rates of replacement, it would take anywhere from twenty 20) to twenty-five (2 5) years to completely rejuvenate the meter population in single family residences. Most of our meters are under twenty years old and are from a massive change out done in the 19801s. On average we are replacing meters that are fifteen (15) years old and find that they are relatively accurate from spot check testing we conduct, The majority of all our water meters are manufactured by three (3) different companies. By far and away Badger Meter Inc. has supplied the bulk of all our residential meters and agood portion of the commercial water meters. We have up to now standardized all our residential services with Badger meters. Their overall performance has been very good. Hersey Meter is a distant second and are primarily larger'c'ommercial meters and fire protection meters.• In recent years, (the last four), we have been using the Metron-Farnier Spectrum meters, This water meter incorporates a relatively new design and has increased our ability to capture some of the very low water flows which the more traditionally designed meters were unable to record, (see attached memo 2/12/96.) There are only fifteen (15) of these installed and they have been used exclusively on our larger accounts, e.g. Randhurst Shopping Center, 3COM, Ramada 'Inn, etc. We have found these units to be very successful in detecting lower water flows and hope to utilize this typeof meter more on our larger consumers. It is important when developing a,comprehensive water meter" Policy to'consider the areas where unaccounted for water losses are the highest. The Illinois Department of Natural Resources IDNR, the state regulatory body for all Lake Michigan users, requires an annual cbnsumption report which details all water use from October 1't of one year to September 3 oth of the next vear. This twelve month report records all water that has been b� illed during that period. The purpose of this report is to account for the total water diverted from Lake Michigan each year. The report compares our metered or billed water with our purchased water, Page 4 Water Meter Policy Reconuneiidations January 20, 1998 which we receive from the Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Water Agency, NSMJAWA. The difference between these can be no more than eight percent (8%) unaccounted for flow which includes the allowable leakage the IDNR defines by the type, size,,age, and miles, of water main in service. I have documented the last four (4) years of these reports to illustrate how our purchased water amounts compare to water billed. These are raw figures and do not reflect any allowable losses which occur due to normal pipe leakage. Our allowable losses, based on current inventory levels, averages six (6%) percent. The following table demonstrates water billed as compared to our purchased amounts from NSMJAWA using our present population of water meters. # NHM1111�,Ow- , ''I'll" 'eiy rate;1 Averagilng a 94% re TABIX As you can see from "table 1" our Single Family Residences, SFRs, constitute 88% of the service connections. If we compare this with their water consumption we see that they only bring in 56% of the water revenues, It is therefore apparent, as seen in ""tablethe 12% of non -SFR water meters bring in over 44% of the revenues made from water sales. There are approximately 1450 non -SFR water meters and of these a little over 250 are fire meters. The fire meters represent a fraction of the total water use, less than a million gallons per year, and in that regard are marginal at best. In addition, the fire meters are read only once a year and as such impact very little on our time demands, By subtracting the fire meters from the equation we see that in reality only about 1200 water meters, or about 10% of the meter population, contribute to almost half of our water billed. I believe this is a crucial point when analyzing water meter policy and operations. Another very important point is that using our average of 94% accountable water and adding the <6% allowable losses leaves us with less than 1% unaccounted for water. This is an extremely respectable amount. Lastly, even though most of the SFR meter readings received are correct, we still need a quality control check to confirm the overall accuracy of the current post card meter reading system. To accomplish this we have a summer residential water meter reading program. The program includes physically inspecting and actually reading every meter in the entire Village each four (1) E............. . . ........... . ...... 44.E . . . . . . . .................... r3 i * o nnn�i�in uui oI oo NMI M4 '"ON, limw%tr 1=0 I I .......... SFR= Family Residence Single% Rep�rese,j, aing 88 of our service connections, SFRS O/oTOT= Percent of Total REC= Recovered ,bring in about 56% of the water revenues. As you can see from "table 1" our Single Family Residences, SFRs, constitute 88% of the service connections. If we compare this with their water consumption we see that they only bring in 56% of the water revenues, It is therefore apparent, as seen in ""tablethe 12% of non -SFR water meters bring in over 44% of the revenues made from water sales. There are approximately 1450 non -SFR water meters and of these a little over 250 are fire meters. The fire meters represent a fraction of the total water use, less than a million gallons per year, and in that regard are marginal at best. In addition, the fire meters are read only once a year and as such impact very little on our time demands, By subtracting the fire meters from the equation we see that in reality only about 1200 water meters, or about 10% of the meter population, contribute to almost half of our water billed. I believe this is a crucial point when analyzing water meter policy and operations. Another very important point is that using our average of 94% accountable water and adding the <6% allowable losses leaves us with less than 1% unaccounted for water. This is an extremely respectable amount. Lastly, even though most of the SFR meter readings received are correct, we still need a quality control check to confirm the overall accuracy of the current post card meter reading system. To accomplish this we have a summer residential water meter reading program. The program includes physically inspecting and actually reading every meter in the entire Village each four (1) Page 5 Water Meter Policy Reconwendat ions January 20, 1998 years. The SFR customers are divided into four (4) different billing cycles loosely based on geographical location. Each summer seasonal employees are hired to manually read and inspect water meters from one of these cycles. This insures that at least once every four (4) years we confirm the accuracy and validity of the readings we receive from our residents via post cards. We can see that our results are correct by the rate of recovery seen in the water purchased vs. the water sold. At 940. we realize an excellent return on our product distribution. This fact is also vital to our examination of meter operation and performance. A UTO MA TE, D AIIE TER READING, AMR Our experiences with ACCESSplus water meter systems have been mixed. We have eliminated all but a handful of non -SFR reads, (less than ten are still read manually each month), from our meter books. This has certainly freed up our people from time consuming meter reading. What should also be considered is the maintenance of the AMR system. There is less time reading, but we have more time spent maintaining this type of AMR module. These devices require batteries, the batteries typically have a shelf life of 5-8 years. Our experience has shown that although the ACCESSplus frees us from meter reading there is a substantial delinquency associated with these devices (sometimes as much as 10%.) In addition, the maintenance of these devices is time consuming and expensive. We have had much more success with the TRACE units and to date they have required minimum repair or maintenance. The main reason for problems with the ACCESSplus is the fact that they are married to another utility. Telephone interruptions, disconnected phone lines, vacancies, and vandalism are a few of the more common problems experienced with this technology. Price wise these two (2) styles of AMR devices are somewhat comparable. The ACCESSplus units cost $232.00 installed. Whereas ,the TRACE meters are installed for $193.00.. If we contrast these costs with the cost of installing a manual local read water meter, at $69.00 per meter, we see a substantial difference. All of these prices are based on contracting out the installation work and using the standard 5/8 inch residential size meter as an example. It is clear that the use of AMR meter devices dramatically increases the cost vis-a-vis a locally read water meter, RECOMMENDATIONS In light of the aforementioned information and the history we have had with the post card system, it is my opinion we should consider a modified approach to meter reading utilizing both post cards and AMR. The non -SFR meters have all but been eliminated Page 6 Water Meter Policy Reconunendations January 20, 1998 irector of Pubyic Works, Glen R. Andler RO/ ro Deputy Director of Public Works, Sean Dorsey file FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: February 12, 1996 SUBJECT: Randhurst Mall "dater Usage Over the past two years we have been experimenting with a new type of water meter (Metron) that is designed to record low flows on large water services. Most of our water services 3" and above are equipped with a standard compound water meter. This meter is designed to deliver large flows when the demand is required. On the ether hand, during low flaw periods the accura- cy is not the best. In contrast this new Metron meter has the ability to deliver the high flows as well as give a more accu- rate accounting of low flows. Attached is a consumption and billing comparison for Randhurst Mall which has a 6" water service. Prier to 1995 Randhurst's water service was equipped with a standard 6" compound meter. Even though over the past couple of years there has been a lot of remodeling and move -ins and move --guts within the Randhurst Mall, I believe: the new Metron meter is the main reason for the 30% increase in water accountability, as compared to 1994 us- age. Attached is a consumption and billing comparison for Randhurst. 1993 and 1994 are water usages as measured by the 6" compound meter. 1995 is measured by the new Metron meter. The price of the Metron $4107.00 for a standard Metron meters installed es ranging in size from other services where we accountabilitye meter was $2,985.00 as compared to 6" compound meter. We currently have 7 within our water system on water servic-- 2" to 611. We will continue to evaluate have the potential for increased water Glen R An, cc: Village Manager Michael. Janonis Deputy Director Sean Dorseye-,'"` Attachments RANDH S TW : TR /FILE, / OMMDEv Rt cn 4. Scna cc 0 s Ob Cp a; r 0 o rr E > It 20 • %waft 0 C) 10) 0 C)o 0 cn 0 Gb V) V. *low M C) CD E soft Wmi o > CST MAMA W� o IL (1) r Room, go" ago", 10 Lw J"�Aftl' uj CL to 01) a) 0) 0, 0 cv) co 0) 0 E co NUNN* cc CO) w Rt • cu 2 voo Cox. O CL C J U m M ul N 0 0 CN 0OU X SUOUL20 C 4 CL Cd Ja 4) LL U C� Q) Cn Y to 0) C: Q CL C 4 E E 4 0 CJ U 2 M ul N 0 0 CN 0OU X SUOUL20 C 4 CL Cd Ja 4) LL U C� MAYOR Gerald L. Farley TRUSTEES George A. Clowes, Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Daniel A. Nocchi Irvana K. Wilks, VILLAGE MANAGER Michaet'E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK Carol A. Fields &LO"01 C1 'ro spt;� t I I all'g e Of Mllou nz P MINUTES FLOATING COFFEE WITH COUNCIL SATURDAY, JANUARY 10, 1998 9aN00 A.M. MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE HALL 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET Mayor Gerald L.Ar-ariey called the meeting to order at 9:00 a.m. Also present was Trustee Timothy Corcoran and Village Manager Michael Janonis. Vitlage residents in attendance were: Frank Smith, 903 Quince Lane -arry L. Gillreath, 1880 West Palm Drive Frank Smith, 903 Quince, indicated that he lives in an area of town where water and sanitary sewer services are provided by Citizens' Utilities Company as opposed to the Village of Mount Prospect. Mr. Smith wanted to know whether Citizens' Utilities Company notifies the Fire Department, on a regular basis, when water service is shut off, either by main breaks or planned system maintenance. He felt thi's was important information for the Fire Department to have when responding to fire emergencies. Mr. Janonis indicated that he did not know what the reporting protocol was, but would find out from the Fire Department and report back to Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith also inquired about the status of the Wisconsin Central/North Central commuter line and future plans to add a second track to the system. Mr. Janonis indicated that there had been no public hearings or otherinformation distributed lately. Mr. Smith indicated that if a second track goes in, he felt that it should go on the west side of the existing track, as far away from the existing family homes as possible. Mr. Smith also noted that he had received a response from Congressman Porter's office to his recent letter opposing the expansion. He indicated that Congressman Porter was supportive of the proje...... da iv MP I dp All Ak 41p• Alk • AL AL AL 40 Ak ♦ AL r r i db Ah AIL AL A6 AL Ah AL Aft Aft db AL A& 0& Ak i Ak it db AL A& AL AL• Ah r i A6 dr AL imp ift Ak Ab Ah Ok Ab ab• Ab Olt 40 do : : I a 0 a of Ak 4 Ab • AdAL As All i• r! 6 W 0 dp AIL 4V i JIL Alb 40 dp Ah AL AIL 40 AL 410 dIL Ab AL dp Ab 10 6 AS dp AL 40 AL OF Ab dp As Ab OF AL 0 There were,othe rl residents aftenda I nce who wished to bring forth any iscussion items. n Mayor Farley closed the Village Hall Coffee with Councii at 10:01 a.m. He indicated that 11 Trustee Corcoran, Village Manager Janonis and he would be traveling to the Public Works Council b rs atAhe "floating" location of Ahe Coffee with facifin L y to join other Board mem e meeting. MEJ/rcc All I - 0 - a a - M MINUTES SATURDAY, JANUARY 10, 1998 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY, 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD Trustees Paul Wm. Hoefert, Daniel A. Nocchi, and Irvana K. Wilks called the rneetig to order at 9--1 AM. Representing staff was Deputy Director of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey. Village residents :?-ttendance were. - Michael Zielinski, 934 Tower, Drive Diane and Jerry Peterson, 202 Faew Avenue Mark Lattner, 407 Oak,Street Dennis and Tom Reindl, 30 South Mam* Street Judy and J im S alazzo, , 10 North Ken ilworth Avenue Ray Louis, 706 SeeGwun Avenue John Feuerborn, 1498 Brownstone Court, #102 Mrs. Diane Peterson, 202 Fairview Avenue. Mrs. Peterson commented that she had seen press coverage of the "Great World" plan for redevelopment of the downtown area. She asked 'if the Board was gi*vm*g this concept serious consideration. She also asked if the Board was considering other options for downtown redevelopment. Trustee Wilks explained that the "Great World" plan was an unsolicited concept ot commbrought forward by a private citizen. The Village did nission the plan. Trustee Wilks, along with Trustees Hoefert and Nocchi, expressed personal reservations about the constructability and economic viability of the "Great World" plan. Trustee Wilks also explained that staff had recently circulated a Request for Prosposals (RFP) to qualified redevelopment consultants and designers. The purpose of this RFP is to solicit alternative downtown redevelopment plans for the Plan Commt*ssion and Board to consider. Trustee Nocchi explained the RFP process and cautioned that it 'is unlikely any one plan will be developed to fruition. In reality, 'it 'is probable that only part, or parts, of an approved plan will be built. Trustee Hoefert emphasized that the value of an overall plan is to let developers and builders know what the people of Mount Prospect would like to see happen 'in their downtown. Mr. Michael Zielinsld, 934 Tower Dn"ve. Mr. Zielinski stated that he is attending to listen to the discussion regarding downtown redevelopment. Mr. Jerry Peterson, 202 Fm*rvl'ew Avenue. Mr. Peterson expressed concern about the econonlic impact that the "Great World" plan would have on existing businesses such as Randhurst Shopping Center. He and Mrs. Peterson also mentioned that they do not like the idea of more condominiums, apartment buildings, or other high rise structures in the downtown area. Trustee Hoefert stated that he shares Mr. Peterson's concerns about the effects that downtown redevelopment will have on existing businesses. He also suggested that the vacancy problem in a large retail structure, such as the MIde-long building envisioned in "Great World", could be a magnification of the "Big Box" retail center vacancy problem. Trustee Hoefert concluded his comments by noting that he shares the Petersons' disdain for high rise a. 4 1 . 0 00 Mo w v wr pp rr Mayor Farltm;o'&.Y , adjoumed the meefi g at approxi*mately 10:50 AM. Respectfully Submitted, 77��7 Sean P. Dorsey Deputy Director of P 'orksl SPD X-.TILESWRONTOFFXADMIN\CWC198.DOC MAYOR Gerald L. Farley TRUSTEES George A. CSI es Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert Richard M. Lohrstorfer Daniel A. No hi Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis VILLAGE CLERK Carol A. Fields ........................ 07 0- Phono:818-5328 Fax: (847)818-5329 TDD: (847) 392-6064 THE JANUARY 28,11998 MEETING OF THE BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMSSI ON HAS BEEN CANCELED, THE NEXT MEE'T'ING IS SCHEDULED FOR WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25 ,1998 AT 7:30 P.M. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING. Dated this 21st day of Januar°,,1 , MAYOR � Gerald L. Farley TRUSTEES , 'ills ;'# : ��111 0 George A. IcWes Phone. (347) 313-5323 Timothy J. Corcoran F 47 313-5329 Paul '1 m. H4efert TDD: 347 392-6064 4 Richard Lohratorfer Daniel A. Nocchi Irvana I. Wilks 'ie,, url", spe, IL.L..AC� MANAGER,Aboa 2� IkAWL or I It 17 Michael E. ,Janonla l'Vo"111a, CommunityVILLAGE oLEDevelopment Department Carol A. Fields100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I DA MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1 ► I MEETING LOCATION: MEETING DATE & TIME: Senior Center Thursday 100 South Emerson. Street January 29, 199 Mount Prospect, IIS 60056 7:30 p.m. I. CALL TO OR -DER Il. ROLL CALL 1 III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES TES -- November 13, 1997 IV. OLD BUSINESS- Continuance from 11/13/97 A. ZBA - 7.97%l ,g %a Hames, LLC/3032-34 ,-34 W. Algonquin Rd. Village Board Final Rezom*ng from R -X Single Family District to R-2 Planned Unit Development V4 NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA-2 -97/1.621 W. Algonquin Village Board Final Rezo*=9 from R -X Single Family District to B-3 Co, ty Shopping District • _ .- 9-97/1. + 41 W Algonquin Village Berard Final Rezoning Tom R -X Single Family District t -3 Coiun ty Shopping District C. Z A-31-97140+0 W. Central Rd. Village Board Final Conditional Use for an Animal Hospital 'CJI. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS VII, ADJOURNMENT 1 Any Individual who'would like to atte d this . eti , but because of a disability needs some accommodation to p►ar lcipate, should contact the C munity Development Department at 100 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, 'IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064. A 41P ZA3 1 0 WCOKS) a X �r9UW I 11 40 Hobo, A ZBA CASE NO, ZBA-27-97 PETITIONER: I Z11112 - - ---- N - I I I 0� ----i -- 0 -6 0 1 DQV Hearing Date: November 13, 1997 Insi*gm*a Homes, L.L.C. 750 N. McHenry Road Buffalo Grove, IL 60081 Anne Miller !4r Ln Westmont, IL 60051E Homer Gribble 2850 Southhampton Dr. Rolling Meadows, IL 60008 LIM- -Ar= 1) Rezone from R -X Single Family to R-2 Single Family Residence District to %Wf construct attached s* le family homes, Ing 2) Variation to reduce front yard building setbacks from thirty feet (30') to twenty feet (20') for all units (Section 14.1105.B) 3) Vanation, to reduce the exterior side yard from twenty feet (20') to fifteen feet (15 for one unit (See. 14.11 05,B) Gilbert Basnk Chairtnan Ronald Cassidy Leo Floros Elizabeth Luxem Michaele Skowron 0 ABSENT. Arlene Juracek Jack Verhasselt Chairman Gil Basnik called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. hnafl�%eth% Luxem, made a motion to approve the minutes of Case No, ZBA,-23-97. Motion was seconded by Michaele Skowron and approved by a vote of 4-0, with one abstention by Ron Cassidy, MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes of Case No. ZBA-27-97