HomeMy WebLinkAbout0820_001Next Ordinance No. 4918
Next Resolution No. 22-98
Meeting Location:
Mount Prospect Senior Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
11 CALL TO ORDER
DEPUTY VILLAGE CLERK
ORDER OF B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
April 7, 1998
April
7:30 P. M.
III ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee George Clowes Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Daniel Nocchi
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustce.,ft; vIrvana Wilks
III, INVOCATION am Trustee Clowes
IV, APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 18, 1998
V. APPROVE BILLS
VI a MAYORS REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION:
B. PRESENTATION:
C. PRESENTATION:
ARBOR DAY, APRIL'' 4, 1998
1997 TREE CITY U.S.A. AWARD
TO SANDY CLARK FOR EXCEPTIONAL PERFORMANCE
AWARD FOR JOURNALISM FROM THE AMERICAN
PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION
CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH
ALL
ANY INDMD UA L WITH A DISABIUTY WHO WOULD LIKE Td A TTEND THIS MEE77NG SHOULD CONTA CT THE
WLLA GE' MA NA GER'S OFFICE A T 1 00 S 0 U TH EMERSON STREET. 84 7/3 92-6'G 00sv TDD 8471'" 9 2,6064.
E. PROCLAMATION: CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY FESTIVAL, May 4..8,1998
F. PRESENTATION: COMMEMORATIVE LICENSE PLATE IN HONOR OF
THE CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY PROGRAM
PROCLAMATION: ALCOHOL AWARENESS MONTH
PROCLAMATION: INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WErr%*,
April 5 -- 11,1998
Ist reading of, AN, ORDINANCEAMENDING CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES), OF TILLAGE CODE
This Ortlinance, deletes the Class 11,80 liquor license issued to Marlon's 11,
2364 South Elmhurst Road, which has gone out of business. (Exhibit A)
J. Appointments
V11, COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
V111. OLD BUSINESS
A. I st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR, PROPERTY
GENERALLY KNOWN AS 408 S. HI LUSI
This Ordinance grants an exception from Development Code to allow the (Exhibit 13)
homeowner to build over the lot line.
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance creates the prohibition of keeping bees and pigeons. (Exhibit C)
IX, NEW BUSINESS
A. IBA 01-98,1768 W. Golf Road, Mount Prospect Commons Plaza
The Petitioner is requesting a Coridition Use, to a1low, a 120 foot high
wireless telecommunications tower. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended 4-0.
B. IBA 25-97, Text amendment
The proposed text amendment establishes regulations governing
telecommunications towers, pursuant to newly adopted federal
regulations. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended 4-0.
C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V ENTITLED
"METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance increases the water and sewer rates, as provided in the (Exhibit D)
annual budget for 1998.
D. Accept public improvements installed in conjunction with the Meier Road
Subdivision.
E. 1 st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF REAL
ESTATE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3 SOUTH WILLS STREET
This Ordinance authorizes the purchase of the subject property as part of the
TIF redevelopment area. (Exhibit E)
F0 A RESOLUTION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS FOR A REDEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT TARGET AREA F AND I WITH TOWN CENTRE L.L.C. I (Exhibit F)
reading of AN - ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL "
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE VILLAGE TO INCLUDE THE RAND
ROADCORRIDOR STUDY
The Plan Commission held a Public Hearing on the proposed am ' endment
to the Comprehensive Plain and recommended approval by a vote of 6-0 (Exhibit G)
VILLAGE MANAGEF;VS REPORT
A. Bid result:
1. 750 foot stream bank stabilization - Weller Creek
B. Accept proposal for construction engineering services for the Weller Creek
Phase I bank stabilization project
C. Accept proposal for engineering services to evaluate the draft Cook County
regulatory FEMA flood mapping applicable to Mount Prospect (Des Plaines
River and Me Donald Creek)
D. Accept proposal for material testing services for the 1998 resurfacing and
and reconstruction programs
E. Authorize purchase of a file server for the Village Hall computer network and
10 PCs for Village Hall/Senior Center users.
F. Appoint Board of Fire and Police Commission prosecutor as Special Counsel
to Fire and Police Chiefs
G. Status Report
X1, ANY OTHER BUSINESS
X11 CLOSED SESSION
A. 5 ILCS 120.2 (c) (21) ""Discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under this
Act, whether for purposes of approval by the body of the minutes or semi-annual
review of the minutes as mandated by Section 2.06."
B. PROPERTY ACQUISITION 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (5) -'The purchase or lease of real
property for the use of the public body, including meetings held for the purpose of
discussing whether a particular parcel should be acquired."
X111. ADJOURNMENT
P R 0 C L A M A T 10 N
WHEREAS, it is believed that 90% of fire deaths in Illinois could be prevented if every
residence had smoke detectors and proper home escape plans; and
WHEREAS, to achieve that goal, the Office of the State Fire Marshal and organizations
of Fire Chiefs, Fire Inspectors and Firefighters have joined together in a state-wide
program to make the public more aware of the advantages that properly placed smoke
detectors can give; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Firefighters work diligently to reduce the horrendous fire
deaths and property losses through prevention, public education and suppression; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Fire Department, Randhurst Shopping Center and
neighboring fire departments will once again host the CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY
FESTIVAL WEEK at the Randhurst Shopping Center May 4 through May 8, 1998, at
which time children of all ages will be encouraged to learn and participate in proper fire
survival techniques.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do
hereby proclaim the week of May 4 through 8, 1998 as
CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY WEEK.
I call upon our citizens individually and as a community to actively support their
firefighters in their efforts to reduce fire deaths, injuries and property loss. I also urge the
news media and other public information officers to join in the recognition and encourage
participation in this event.
.. . . ........... . .
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 7th day of April, 1998
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
March 18, 1998
CALL TO ORDER,
M yor Fbrley called the meeting to order at 7:34 PM.
a
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call.- Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Daniel Nocchi
Trustee Irvana Wilks,
Absent: Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
0
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Nocchi.
I
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to approve the, minutes of the special meeting of the
Mayot'and Board of Trustees held March 2, 199,$,.
Upon roll call,: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi,
Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried. 0 1
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to approve the minutes of the regulaIr meeting of the
Morand Board of Trustees held March 3, 1,998#
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Hoefert,
Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Tru'stee Nocchi, moved to
approve the following list of bills:
General Fund $744,550
Refuse Disposal Fund 223,936
Motor Fuel Tax'Fund 2,951
Community Development Block Grant Fund 19822
Debt Service Fund #*1
Capital Improvement Fund 11,752
Downtown Redev Construction Fund 305
Police & Fire Building Construction
Flood Control Construction Fund
Street Improvement Construction Fund 940915
Water & Sewer Fund 301,914
Parking System Revenue Fund 2j026
Risk Managemerit Fund 147,509
Vehicle Replacement ment Fund 3958.1
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 40,1g1Computer Replacement Fund 56,231
INVOCATION
APPROVE
MINUTES
APPROVE
MINUTES
APPROVE BILLS
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Fire Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
Upon roll call:
Motion carried.
13,537
298,673
$29042lO68
Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Nocchl, Wilks
Hoefert
Nays: None
FINANCIAL
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Nocchl, moved to accept
REPORT
the financial report dated January 1, 1998 through February 28,
1998, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MAYOR'S REPORT
PROCLAMATION:
Mayor Farley presented a proclamation to Ernie Mehlan in
SENIOR
recognition of Senior Citizen Celebration Day, May 13, also being
CITIZEN
called "Jewels of Our Community Day." Mr. Mehlan accepted the
CELEBRATION
proclamation on behalf of the Mount Prospect Senior Advisory Council
DAY
and Men's Club.
Trustee Hoefert made a motion to consider an Item not listed on the
agenda. Said motion was seconded by Trustee Nocchii.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FLOOD PLAIN
A Resolution was presented to oppose revisions to the Flood MAP
Insurance Rate Map of 1998 which expands the area included in a
flood plain within Mount Prospect.
RES. NO.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for passage of
13-98
Resolution 13-98
A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF 1998
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks
Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried'.
Jack BerrInger and Bill Fowler, property owners in Woodview Manor,
an area affected by the flood map revisions expressed their
appreciation to the Village Board for their efforts and support in
opposing the new map. They also suggested that the Board consider
having an Independent study conducted of the proposed map.
(1,
Page 2 - March 18, 1998
1h,
There were no appointments made, however Mayor Farley that he APPOINTMENTS
would be making commission appointments within the month of April,
CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None.
PC -15-97, 15 E. Prospect Avenue
PLAT OF
A plat of subdivision for the Mid -City National Bank was submitted
SUBDIV:
to consolidate four lots and one parcelInitto a one -lot subdivision.
MID -CITY
The Plan Commission had previously voted 5-0 in favor of
NATIONAL
recommending approval.
BANK
Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to
authorize the Mayor to sign, and the Clerk to attest his signature
on the Mid -City Plat of Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes- Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks
Nays: None
I kTA
NEW BUSINESS
PC -01-98,408 S. Hi-Lusi Avenue
A request was made for an exception from the Development Code DEV.CODE
to allow the homeowners to construct an addition over the lot line. EXCEPTION:
The Plan Commission had recommended granting the exeption by HI -WWI
a vote of 6-0. AVENUE
Community Development Director, William Cooney, updated the
audience on the status of this case.
Michael Zimmerman, Attorney for the petitioners, addressed the
Board on behsff,ofthe petition ers,'and ask ed"tfiat "they, st'
rongly
consider approval of this, request, st",atingo that"the pe I Mlo ' nerg''
case
me,et's the definitIon,of ah,ardship, a 110 a bJ e J, n S e c t i, 6 n,1 . 1" 11 " of,
the Village's Development Code.
�'O�bjecto,r to1his petition,
Attotney,Ga',ry, Blackman, reps esentin',gan,
Mr. Morrfsas'ked that the Villard(re,ftai'n,,from ro,,ving,the
requost''an dal low the maftert,,,17 be settled within a court Of lowl, as,
a restrictive covenant exists which was recorded in 1926, prior to
the present homeowners purchasing this property.
Robert Veheadl(iressed''the �,Boair ,,d, representing approximately 25
residents in, attendancej andexpressed their support for approval
offfier)PqVesIt ofthe homeowns,,
Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee, moved to concur with the
recommendation of the Plan Commission and grant an exception
to the Development Code to allow the construction of a r'esloe,nitial
building addition 9cross a lot line.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 - March 18,1998
An Ordinance will be presented at the April 7 meeting.
GENERAL An Ordinance was presented for first reading which
OBLIGATION authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds with
BONDS proceeds to be used to finance the Weller Creek Flood
Control Project, the street improvement program, and
for downtown property acquisition.
Brian Caputo, Director of Finance, stated that bids were opened
on the morning of March 18, with seven bids having been
received. He also asked that the second reading of this
Ordinance be waived, with acceptance of the bid submitted by
Harris Trust & Savings Bank of Chicago.
Mr. Caputo Introduced R.V. Norene, President of R.V. Norene &
Associates, Inc. and Financial Consultant for the Village, who
provi ided an overview of the bids.
Re
A Interest.Rate
HARRIS TRUST Harris Trust & Slavings Bank 4.238%
& SAVINGS Salomon Smith Barn ey 4.252
BANK Success Nationl B
aank 4.26543
Griffin, Kubik., Stephens & Thompson 4.2782
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter/Dean Witter Reynolds, 4.2991
Paine Webber, and CIBC Oppenheimer Corp.
EVEREN Securities and A.G. Edwards & Sons 4.35894
Robert W. Baird & Co. and Banc One Capital 4.3618
Trustee Hoefert stated that while he supports the opinion of the
Board in proceedlng w ith the bond issuance, he will abstain, from
voting due to a possible conflict of interest as his employer 'is part
of one of the bidding groups.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to waive
the rule requiring the second reading of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes-, Lohrstorferocchl, Wilks, Farley
Abstain: Hoefert
Motion carried.
ORD. NO. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for passage
4917 of Ordinance No. 4917
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE
OF $2,915,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS,
SERIES 1998A AND $100,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 1998B, OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
Upon roll call.* Ayes:. Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks, Farley
Abstain-, Hoefert
Motion carried.
SUBURBAN A Resolution was presented to authorize entering into a contract
PRIMARY with the Suburban Primary Health Care Council for a primary health
HEALTH CARE care program.
RES. NO, Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for passage of
14-98 Resolution No. 14-98
Page 4 - March 18, 1998
There were no appointments made, however Mayor Farley that he APPOINTMENTS
would be making commission app ointments within the month of April.
CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None.
OLD BUSINESS
PC -15-3?, 15 E. Prospect Avenue
PLAT OF
A plat of subdivision for the Mid -City National Bank was submitted
SUBDIV:
to consolidate four lots and one parcel into a one -lot subdivision.
MID -CITY
The Plan Commission had previously voted 5-0 in favor of
NATIONAL
recommending approval.
BANK
Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to
authorize the Mayor to sig n,,, and the Clerk to attest his signature
on the Mid -City Plat of Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
PC -01-989 408 S. Hi-Lusi Avenue
A request was made for an exception from the Development Code CTEV. CODE
to allow the homeowners to construct an addition over the lot line. EXCEPTION:
The Plan Commission had recommended granting the exeption by HI-LUSI
a vote of 6-0. AVENUE
Community Development Director, William Cooney, updated the
audience on the status of this case.
Michael Zimmerman, Attorney for the petitioners, addressed the
Board on behalf of the petitioners, and asked that they strongly
consider approval of this request,, stating, that, the petitioners' case
meets the definition of a hardship, allowable in Section 16.111 of
the Village's Development Code.
Attorney Gary, Blackman, representing an objector to this, petition,
Mt. Morris, asked that the Village Board refrain ftom approving the
request and allow the matter to be settled within a court of law, as
a restrictive covenant exists which was recorded In 1926, prior to
the present homeowners purchasing this property. 1,
Robert Vehe addressed the Board, representing approximately 25
residents in attendance, and expressed their support for approval
of the request of the the homeowners.
Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee, moved to concur with the
recommendation of the Plan Commission and grant an exception
to the Development Code to allow the construction of a residential
building addition across a lot line.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried,
An Ordinance will be presented at the April 7 meeting.
GENERAL An Ordinance was presented for first reading which
OBLIGATION authorizes the issuance of general obligation bonds with
BONDS proceeds to be used to finance the Weller Creek Flood
Control Project, kthe street improvement program, and
for downtown property acquisition.
Brian Caputo, Director of Finance, stated that bids were opened
on the morning of March 18, with seven bids having been
received. He also asked that the second reading of this
Ordinance be waived, with acceptance of the bid submitted by
Harris Trust & Savings Bank of Chicago.
Mr. Caputo introduced R.V. Norene, President of R.V. Norene &
Associates, Inc. and Financial Consultant for the Village, who
provided an overview of the bids',
HARRIS TRUST Harris Trust & Savings Bank
4.238%
& SAVINGS Salomon Smith Barney
4.252
BANK Success National Bank
4.26543
Griffin, Kubik, Stephens & Thompson
4.2782
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter/Dean Witter Reynolds,
4.2991
Paine Webber, and CIBC Oppenheimer Corp.
EVEREN Securities and A.G. Edwards & Sons
4.35894
Robert W. Baird & Co. and Banc One Capital
-4-3618
Trustee Hoefert stated that while he supports the opinion of the
Board in proceeding with the bond issuance, he will abstain from
voting due to a possible conflict of interest as his employer is part
of ane of the bidding groups.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to waive
the rule requiring the second reading of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks, Farley
Abstain: Hoefert
Motion carried.
ORD. NO. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for passage
4917 of Ordinance No. 4917
A
DOM
Motion carried.
SUBURBAN A Resolution was presented to authorize entering Into a contract
PRIMARY with the Suburban Primary Health Care Council for a primary health
HEALTH CARE care program.
RBS. NCS. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for passage of
14-98 Resolution No. 14-98
Page 4 - March 18, 1998
a
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AND SUBURBAN PRIMARY
HEALTH CARE COUNCIL, INC. FOR THE PRIMARY
HEALTH CARE PROGRAM
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi,
.Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried. 4
• a contract
with, the Resource, •
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 15.98
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE RESOURCE
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY LIVING
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi,
Wilks, Farley
Nays. None
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented whichold authorize, entering
into an agreement wit; ' h the Girl louts Illinois Crossroads
roads
Council, Inc. for the Boxwood Advocacy Program.
Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 18-98
Me
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND GIRL SCOUTS -
ILLINOIB CROSSROADS COUNCIL, INC. FOR
THE BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM
Upon roll call-, Ayes: Lohrstorfer, Hoefert, Nocchi,
Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried..
A Resolution was presented to authorize entering into an
agreement with the Camp Fire Boys and Girls Metro Chicago
Council for the New Horizons Program.
Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Resolution No, 17-98
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE CAMP FIRE
BOYS AND GIRD METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
COUNCIL FOR THE NEW HORIZONS PROGRAM
Page 5 - March 18, 1998
RESOURCE
CENTER FOR
COMMUNITY
LIVING
RES. NO.
15-98
4�
:+r sell
,r •
REB. NO.
18-98
CAMP FIRE BOYS
& GIRLS NEW
HORIZONS
PROGRAM
RES. NO.
17-98
Motion carried.
CLAYGROUND A Resolution was presented which would authorize entering
into a contract with Clayground, Inc. for a teaching ceramics
and arts program for residents of the Boxwood area.
RES. NO., Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for
20-98 passage of Resolution No. 20-98
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN" AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AND CLAYGROUND, INC.
FOR A TEACHING CERAMICS AND ARTS
PROGRAM
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi,
Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
1111;
I I SU"
Allmool
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer,, Nocchi,
Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
RESOURCE
A Resolution was presented which would authorize entering into
CENTER FOR
a contract with the Resource Center for the Elderly for Senior
SENIOR
Shared Housing.
HOUSING
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for passage
RES. NO.
of Resolution No. 18-98
18-98
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE RESOURCE
CENTER FOR THE ELDERLY FOR SENIOR
SHARED HOUSING
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Wilks,
Nocchl, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CEDA
A Resolution was presented which would authorize entering into
NW SELF-HELP
an agreement with the CEDA Northwest Self -Help Center to
CENTER
assist low income, homeless, and near -homeless residents of
the Village.
REB. NCS.
Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved for
19-98
passage of Resolution No. 19-98
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE CEDA NORTHWEST
SELF-HELP CENTER
Upon roll call: Ayes.- Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi,
Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CLAYGROUND A Resolution was presented which would authorize entering
into a contract with Clayground, Inc. for a teaching ceramics
and arts program for residents of the Boxwood area.
RES. NO., Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for
20-98 passage of Resolution No. 20-98
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN" AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AND CLAYGROUND, INC.
FOR A TEACHING CERAMICS AND ARTS
PROGRAM
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi,
Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
1111;
I I SU"
Allmool
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented to authorize the transfer of 1998
Mate volume cap funds to Madison County, Illinois, in the
amount of $2,702,000 to assist in the financing of sewage
and/or solid waste disposal facilities.
Lisa Martez, Attorney with the law firm of Chapman & Cutler,
and representing Shell Oil Company, addressed questions
from Trustee Wilks regarding the reallocation of these volume
cap funds.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for
passage of Resolution No, 21-98
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER
OF 1998 VOLUME CAP OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT TO MADISON COUNTY,
ILLINOIS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchl,
Wilks;
Nays: None
Motion carried,
An Ordinance was presented for first reading which would
amend Chapter 20 of the Village Code to► Include pigeons
and bees in the list of animals prohibited from being kept
in the Village.
Trustee Hoefert complimented Village staff on the way this
matter has been conducted and encouraged viewers to
express any concerns they might have regarding harboring
these animals.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at the
April 7 meeting of the Village Board.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager Michael Janonis presented bid results.
Bids were received for the 1998 Street
Resurfacing Program.
Bidder
, . T Q) tta I Bii d
Arrow Road Construction
$ 813,725.05
Allied Asphalt Paving Co.
852,243.85
Johnson Paving Co.
960,261.82
R.W. Dunteman Co.
1,112.899.75
A copy of the bid tabulation is attached to these minutes.
Trustee Nocchi, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration and
accept the low bid submitted by Arrow Road Construction
Company for the 1998 Street Resurfacing Program in the
amount not to exceed $813,725.05.
TRANSFER OF
VOLUME CAP
FUNDS
SHELL
OIL CO.
RES. NO.
21-98
AMEND
CHAPTER 20,
ANIMALS
STREET
RESURFACING
PROGRAM
ARROW
ROAD
CONSTRUCTION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi,
Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried, U11
PURCHASE
A request was presented by the Police Department to waive
DETECTIVE
the bid process and authorize the purchase of one Chevrolet
CAR &
Lumina to replace a 1993 Chevrolet Caprice at a cost not to
RESTORE
exceed $18,476, to be used as a detective car.
SQUAD CAR
Jim Guenther, Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor for the Village
answered several questions presented by members of the
Board',
MILES Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to
CHEVROLET concur with the recommendation of staff by waiving the bid
process to authorize the purchase of one Chevrolet Lumina
from Miles Chevrolet at a cost not to exceed $18,476.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was also presented by the Police Department to
waive the bid process and authorize the restoration of a
1995 Chevrolet Caprice sedan, one of the Village's squad
cars, with work to be done by Shaheen Chevrolet in Lansing,
Michigan at an estimated cost of $8,000.
SHAHEEN Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to concur
CHEVROLET with the recommendation of staff to restore Squad P-4 at
Shaheen Chevrolet at a cost not to exceed $8,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carded,
Mr. Janonis stated that he has consulted with the Village attorney
and understands that the Village Code indicates that a waiver of
the requirement for a bid procedure is not required when purchases
are being made through state contractors.
COMPUTER A request was presented to authorize the purchase of six
PURCHASE personal computers from Gateway 2000 for an amount not to
exceed $10,290. The Village Board previously approved, in
November 1997, the purchase of 44 computers, therefore funds
are currently available In the 1998 budget.
Tru 'tee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Nocchi, moved to concur
with the recommendation of staff to purchase six computers from
Gateway 2000 in an amount not to exceed $19,290.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Nocchi, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
�1i
11111111, M-11
a
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 8:58 PM, ADJOURN
Velma W. Lowe
Deputy Village Clerk
Page 9 - March 18, 1998
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
March 31, 1998
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Other
Cash & Invest
Balance
3/13/98 thru
Per Attached
Credits/
Balance
3/13/98
3/31/98
List of Bills
(Deblfts,�_
3/31/98
General Fund
$6o164,666
21131,137
637,199
(276t971)
71381s633
La ,
SM' F ,
Refuse Disposal Fund
901,153
576,321
2,622
(19859)
1,472,993
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
953,649
17,289
14,821
956,117
Community Development Block Grant
5,474
14,529
16j300
31703
Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Fund
61987
14
71001
Debt Service Funds
2,7531813
169,492
2,923,305
cap,jital P[gig-cts
Capital Improvement Fund
21039,037
35
210390002
Capital Improvement Construction Fund
98,827
'W
98,827
Downtown Redev Const Funds
450,315
5,766
444,549
Police & Fire Building Construction
48,099
48,099
Flood Control Construction Fund
11081,628
78,080
110030548
Street Improvement Const Fund
798,359
1089045
906,404
Ea Fdsv, Eunds
Water & Sewer Fund
21337,363
633,230
60,887
(97,883)
21811,823
Parking System Revenue Fund
686,565
10,637
1,026
(61169)
690,007
Risk Management Fund
3,156,094
38,125
115,539
208,739
31287,419
Vehicle Replacement Fund
11944,528
2,698
86,856
2,028,686
Vehicle Maintenance Fund
89,236
ill
27,629
78,372
140,090
Computer Replacement Fund
112,003
11928
12,398
122,473
JrMgj,,& Agena-Fungi da
Flexcomp Trust Fund
1,685
14,737
16,422
Escrow Deposit Fund
19459,367
595,585
304,428
(30483)
10747,141
Police Pension Fund
26,292,147
49,102
87,804
26,253,445
Fire Pension Fund
28,510,867
72t516
99,694
280483,689
Benefit Trust Funds
.. ..... ..... 1571971
21760
155,211
49, 4
'070
4""'4U
"o
-1, t"O"',24
ORONO!
8'
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 1
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT..
L. GAIL AVEEN
TIMOTHY ..
EEN
ED J. BREFELD
BRISTOL COURT
KENTON J. BROOKS
MARK A DAVIS
CONRADO DE ALMEIDA
DENNY'S RESTAURANTS
CAROL D I G I ACOMO
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
JULIA DRW I LA
ESTATE OF C. MCMILLAN
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO
REFUND
48.84
REFUND
5.33
54.17
REFUND
17.94
REFUND
1.92
19.86
OVERPAYMENT
36.00
OVERPAYMENT
120.00
LUNCHEON
100.00
REFUND
26.91
REFUND
2.88
29./9
REFUND
80.73
REFUND
8.64
89.37
REFUND
8.97
REFUND
0.96
9.93
CUST . NO LONGER LIVES IN MT . PROSP .
72.00
"FUND
43.86
REFUND
4.66
48.52
MEAL VAUUCHER PAYMENT
197.53
REFUND OVERPAYMENT OF TRANSFER
18.00
RET INSTAL 3/31/98
11641.95
RET INSTAL 3/31/98
21759.83
RET INSTAL 3/31/98
71003.58
P/R END 3/26/98
509, 555.69
P/R END 3/26/98
21276.40
P/R END 3/26/98
11306.95
P/R END 3/26/98
34,698-22
P/R END 3/26/98
635.20
P/R END 3/26/98
161995.87
576, 873 . 6
REFUND
23.63
REFUND
2.53
26.16
OVERPAYMENT
59.80
OVERPAYMENT
6.40
66.20
REIMB DYR DEP
79,505.10
EMP SHARE FICA COSTS
17,606.95
EMP SHARE FICA COSTS
170.37
EMP SHARE FICA COSTS
98.16
EMP SHARE FICA COSTS
21607.63
EMP SHARE FICA COSTS
48.35
EMP SHARE FICA. COSTS
11271.60
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE :2
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
F0,11 ty-OLVA I OWN
1
21,803.06
SAVINGS BONDS-P/R 3/26/98
850-00
HEATHER FRANCEK
OVERPAYMENT
24.00
ALAN M. FRIEDLANDER
DUPLICATE PMT
36-00
LYNN GRANT
REFUND FIRE TRAINING CLASS
75-00
HARRY HARTJES
REFUND
23.92
REFUND
2.56
2 6 . 4 8
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457
REIMS DIR DEP
17,199.12
ILLINOIS SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP
DUPLICATE PMT
40-00
INSIGNIA
OVERPAYMENT
40-00
FRANK B. JANTAC
REFUND
23.92
REFUND
2.56
26.48
A.W. KARRAS
REFUND
1.75
REFUND
0.15
1.90
TILLMAN LIGGINS
OVERPAYMENT
24.00
MARKET PLACE CURRENCY EXCH-INC
OVERPAYMENT
48.00
LANETTE MC ANDREWS
BOND REFUND
75.00
METRO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
REIM DIRECT DEP
51,315.14
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
ALLOCATION
21051-10
MARY ALICE NEITZKE
OVERPAYMENT
2.00
OAKTON PAVILLION HEALTHCARE
HOME DELIVERED MEALS
11292.50
PEBSCO
PEBSCO WIRE
14,043.43
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
POLICE PENSION DISB
87,803.60
FIRE PENSION
-9.8, 893 .4 0
186, 697.00
WILMA L. PETERS
OVERPAYMENT
24.00
MICHAEL J. REITZ
OVERPAYMENT
12.00
ROLLING MEADOWS FIRE DEPT
REFUND
225.00
ROTO ROOTER
BOND REFUND
50.00
SANDRA SHIFFLETT
OVERPAYMENT
36.00
CRAIG STEZSKAL
OVERPAYMENT
36.00
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
MAR3 BOND MONEY
21345.00
MAR2 BOND MONEY
41350-00
MAR4 BOND MONEY
21799-00
MAR4 BOND MONEY
11425.00
MAR5 BOND MONEY
400.00
11,319.00
GLENDA TRACY
REFUND
35.88
REFUND
3.84
39.72
TRC PURCHASING INC
REFUND
46.25
U.S.DEPT,OF HOUSING/URBAN DEV.
1997 INTEREST INCOME DUE TO HUD
140.36
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
POSTAGE
31000-00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WIRE TRANS INCOME TAX
92,190.61
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 3
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
WILKIN INSULATION COMPANY
WOLF POINT REALTY
DAVID WOLF
DISBURSEMENTS
41510.00
DISBURSEMENTS
31800.00
DISBURSEMENTS
50.00
100,550.61.
REFUND
55.81
REFS
6.08
62.89
OVERPAYMENT
11.00
REFUND FOR EVERGREEN WOODS SUBDIV
20,121.44
REFUND TRANSFER TAX
660.00
APRIL B. FOLEY LUNCHEON
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE NWMC SUB -REGIONAL BREAKFAST
PETTY CASH -- FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
Geo
kli 114 wok to
DAILYCOMP USA
COMPUSERVE, INC
HERALD
DISTINCTIVE BUgINESS PRODUCTS
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
GOVERNING
HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CEVYf-.Tr--
MICHAEL E. JANONIS
TONER
SURGE PROTECTOR
02/98 FEES
AD
MAINTENANCE
SHIPMENT
POSTAGE
PRE-EMPLOYMENT
PRE-EMPLOYMENT
PRE--EMPL .
PRE-EMPL .
DINNER MEETING
KLEIN, THORPE AND JENK INS , LTD . LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS PLAQUE
72.35
14,112.50
325.00
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 4
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
VII,LAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL O •
PA EVENT
i
.�.
A
HIS AND
CATERING
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
THE DRAWING BOARD
NATIONWIDE
PAPERS
PETTYi FINANCEDEPT.
CODIFIERS,STERLING
AEK COMPUTERS
AMBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP, INC.
ARMOSYSTEMS R
BLACK'" "
r BROMBER
i
BT OFFICE -.r
BRIAN CAPUTO
NWMC SUB -REGIONAL BREAKFAST
LUNCHEON
MISC . FILINGS,
LEGAL SERVICES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
CHARGES FOR MARCH
DUES
DUES
SERVICES
9.25
15-00
372.78
127.50
500.28
58.55
7.00
65.55
399.00
73.00
132.00
205.00
171.00
. « •
FOOD
305.00
MISC EXPENSES
15.82
MISC EXPENSES
5.66
MISC EXPENSES
33.46
DINNER -SOFTWARE CONSITE EVALUATION
57.94
SUPPLIES
TOTAL: 362.94
SUPPLIES
614.84
NEWSLETTER PAPER.
11372.50
MISC EXPENSES
11.70
BOOKLETS
153-00
TOTAL: 21152.04
FEES FOR. SERVICE
15 3 . 5 0
COPIER AGREEMENT
21400.00
AMBULANCE CHGS,
159-00
SUPPLIES
367.65
DINNER -SOFTWARE CONSITE EVALUATION
62.00
SUPPLIES
180-18
REIMS OFOA
386.50
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 5
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TOTAL 10,287.09
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
MICHEAL BLUE
LUNCHEON
41.06
JUDY CONNOLLY
PARKING/COMPUTER TRAY
427.56
DAILY OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE SUPP
39.98
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
SERVICE CP -11 COPIER
105.50
DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS
MAINTENANCE
422-50
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFCR ASSOC
BUDGET AWARD REVIEW FEE
350-00
I.B.M. CORPORATION - SQH
MAINTENANCE
492.00
IGFOA
REGISTRATION
85.00
ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPP
632.00
PAPER SUPP
34.50
666.50
ILLINOIS GFOA
SEMINAR
25-00
JOURNAL TOPICS NEWSPAPERS
SUBSCRIPTION
25.00
NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
SEMINAR-HALINA WROBEL
179.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
7.00
MISC EXPENSES
12.67
19-6 7
RYDIN SIGN AND DECAL
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER
470.00
SKILLPATH SEMINARS
SEMINAR
199.00
SEMINAR
199.00
398.00
STIVERS, TEMPORARY PERSONNEL
813.60
TEMP HELP
11029.71
TEMP HELP
805.13
21648.44
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC.
SUPPLIES
610.61
TOTAL 10,287.09
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
MICHEAL BLUE
EXPENSES
207.80
JUDY CONNOLLY
PARKING/COMPUTER TRAY
10-00
PARKING/ COMPUTER TRAY
43.29
53.29
DISTINCTIVE BUSINESS PRODUCTS
MAINTENANCE
422.50
MAINTENANCE
289.00
711.50
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
35-17
MISC EXPENSES
13.98
MISC EXPENSES
27-00
76.15
SCHWEPPE SONS
COFFEE
28.27
COFFEE & SUGAR
56-82
85.09
STATE OF ILLINOIS
RENEW LICENSE
240.00
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 6
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1316*8 0 *1 w cl) 04 1 WN 0 1 r
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INS,
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
BROWNS
PETTYMARK'S REMODELING & REP., INC.
.SH - FINANCE DEPT.
RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY
SUBURBAN
DANIEL UNGERLEIDER
MICHELE r ,
303 TAXI
AMERICAN CHARGE SERVICE
.
111.
. IM . •
. .
�. _ � 9 . -o
DES PLAINES SENIOR
CENTER
SAID A.
APRIL E. FOLEY
MICHELLE GATTAS
FRANK G I LL I GAN
RENEW LICENSE
RENEW LICENSE
ELEVATOR INSPECTIOA'
REHAB r
REHABLOAN-1615 LINDEN AVE
MISC EXPENSES
CARE-DECEMBERHOUSING ASSISTANCE
ACCES TO 97 r
REIMBURSEMENT
r . r
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
TAXI RIDES
CAB RIDES
CONTRIBUTION
1 r EB i
ff
r . ,
N'�
TOTAL
240-00
240.00
720-00
50.00
160.00
• rr
12, 717.5/
266.80
201.15
134.25
335.40
166.20
18.00
24.00
42.00
10.00
6.00
3.00
9.00
24.00
3.00
9.00
3.00
12.00
6.00
6.00
12.00
6.00
9.00
15.00
6.00
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 7
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
JIM JIRAE
JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS
ORVILLE KRUSE
Fos 00 41� �wlk
f��� vv ut
ARLENE PR.CHAL
SCIENTIFIC SUPPLY CO.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
BERTHA STEIL
KATE -II WESLEY
RUTH WI'T'TENBURG
CLEM WOSICK
R.E I MB . JAN
9 . 0 0
15.00
REIMB.FEB
6.00
R.E I MB . JAN
12 . 0 0
18.00
SUBSCRIPTION
25.00
REIMB.FEB
6.00
REIMB.JAN
3.00
9.00
R.EIMB FEB
18.00
RE I MB , JAN
3 .00
21..0 0
REIMB.FEB
9.00
REIMB.JAN
15.00
24.00
,/9+� . 0
AREIMB.FEB
+
RE J.•" B . JAN
/0
r/{ . 0 0
18_.00
REIMB.FEB
3 .0 0
REIMB.JAN
3.00
6.00
REIMB.FEB
3.00
REIMB.JAN
3.00
6.00
REIMB.FEB
6.00
R.E I MB . JAN
12.0 0
18.00
REIMB.FEB
6 . 0 0
REIMB.JAN
6.00
12.00
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
14.42
LICENSE-FLOREY
40.00
REIMB.FEB
3.00
RE IMB . JAN
1.5.0 0
18.00
REIMB.FEB
12.00
REIMB.JAN
12.00
24 . 00
R.E I MB .FEB
9.00
REIMB.JAN
12...00
21.00
REIMB.FEB
9.00
REIMB. JAN
9.00
1.8.00
REIMB.FEB
6.00
R.E I MB . JAN
3 . 0 0
9.00
TOTAL: 11211.82
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 8
- - ------- - ....................... .... . ......
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMO��j
.. ...........
ABM, INC.
REPAIR FAX
40.00
AMERITECH
PHONE BILL
8.74
PHONE BILL
174.90
PHONE BILL
47.70
231-34
JUSTIN BEACH
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
18.00
LANCE BESTHOFF
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
18.00
BLUE LINE LEARNING GROUP, INC
CD-ROM TRAINING COURSE
395.00
CARDIOPULMONARY REHAB CENTER
TEST
380-00
RICHARD DRAFFONE
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
14.30
EXPERIAN
SERVICE
29.00
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
MONTHLY SERVICE
170.43
MONTHLY SERVICE
100.00
MONTHLY SERVICE
249.22
MONTHLY SERVICE
280-03
799.68
ICMA-401 PLAN
ICMA-401 PLAN PAVLOCK 3/26/98
411-26
ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPP
675.00
ILLINOIS LAW OF CRIMINAL
CRIMINAL UPDATE
130-00
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
UNIFORM
34.95
CLOTHING
104.00
UNIFORM
195.74
334.69
LETCON
REGISTER -H. MOSER,M. LANDEWEER
150-00
MCI WIRELESS
PHONE BILL
476.94
JOSEPH MOREL
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
12-00
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
APRIL 1998 MEMBER ASSESSMENT
27,479.14
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
SEMINAR
690-00
DAVID OKON
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
26.00
PREISER ANIMAL HOSPITAL
STRAYS-JAN/FEB
370.00
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
BUSINESS CARDS
30-00
OFFICE SUPPLY
65.50
OFFICE SUPPLY
690.05
OFFICE SUPPLY
47.35
832.90
RAYMARK OFFICE PROD FURN
OFFICE SUPPLY
192.28
OFFICE SUPPLY
62.15
OFFICE SUPPLY
---46.20
208.23
JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES
PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING
175.00
WILLIAM ROSCOP
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
91.26
ROBERT L. RZEPECKI
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
47.25
MICHAEL J. SEMKIU
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
12.00
ROBERT SMITH
REIMBURSE EXPENSES
61-87
STATE OF ILLINOIS
REIMB FOR RETURNED UNCLASS FINGERP
10.00
RESUBMISSION OF RET PRINTS FOR
10.00
20-00
TELETRAC, INC.
MONTHLY SERVICE
953.00
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 9
XTENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT'
TRITON ELECTRONICS, INC.
REPAIRS
27.50
AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC.
REPAIRS
72.50
AMERITECH
PHONE BILL
100.00
VAN DRIEL'S MEDICAL SURGICAL
LATEX EXAM GLOVES
80.10
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
RADIO REPAIR
49.00
RADIO REPAIR
172.00
RADIO REPAIR
98.00
RADIO REPAIR
172.00
RADIO REPAIR
70.00
561.00
WAREHOUSE DIRECT
OFFICE SUPP
212.20
WOLF CAMERA, INC.
PHOTO PROCESSING
6.97
PHOTO PROCESSING
22.59
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES/ INC.,
PHOTO PROCESSING
2.90
PHOTO PROSES SING
2.90
UNIFORM
35.36
TOTAL: 36,070.52
Fl DEPARTMENT
ACME TRUCK BRAKE & SUPPLY CO.
PARTS
109.46
AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC.
TEST FOR STATION
380.00
AMERITECH
PHONE BILL
17.19
PHONE BILL
71.60
PHONE BILL
45-56
PHONE BILL
16.84
PHONE BILL
18.02
PHONE BILL
59.61
PHONE BILL
8.75
237.57
DONALD M. ANDERSON
EXPENSES
20.00
REGISTRATION
90.00
110.00
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES/ INC.,
UNIFORMS
43-37
UNIFORM
70.80
UNIFORM
78.49
UNIFORMS
130.20
322.86
BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC.
SUPPLIES
94.75
IBUCOM
EQUIP/SERV
240.00
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
CAR WASH
22.50
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
FLOWERS
47.00
COMBINED AREA FIRE TRAINING
REGISTRATION
150.00
REGISTRATION
150-00
300.00
CUSTOM AMBULANCE
OXYGEN ASSEMBLY
95-14
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 10
..........
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
I w I i'1111illll ''1 11) w I ,
;14 you
ENDEAVOR PLUS
MEDICAL EXAM
149.00
FAWLEY AND ASSOC.
FIREMAN IDENTIFICATION TAG
69.90
FIRE RESCUE
SUBSCRIPTIONS
24.95
JAMES M. FLORY
EXPENSES
320.04
GALL'S, INC.
BATTERY
1.54
LIGHT
35.73
SUPPLY
86.02
SUPPLY
99-13
222.42
GEIB INDUSTRIES, INC.
PARTS
10.68
PARTS
16.52
27.20
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
272.72
TIRES
474.90
TIRES
12.75
760.37
GREAT LAKES AIRGAS, INC.
OXYGEN
62.90
OXYGEN SUPP
72.22
135.12
HAIGES MACHINERY
SERVICE CALL/BASKET REPLACED
127.00
HARRISON SUPPLY COMPANY
MISC.
101.00
IAFC
REGISTRATION
275.00
ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPP
225-00
INLAND DETROIT DEISEL-ALLISON
REPAIR
11024-57
KAISER PROFESSIONAL PHOTO LAB
PROCESS FILM
6.25
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
UNIFORMS
34.00
LABSOURCE/ECC
HEARTSAVER GUIDE
360.75
LARRY ROESCH.FORD
PARTS
81-20
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
SAFETY TEST
15.75
LIFE ASSIST
SUPPLY
335-00
MEDICAL SUPP
364.40
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
108.75
808-15
MANAGERS EDGE
SUBSCRIPTION
97.00
METROPOLITAN FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC
REGISTER-FIGOLAH
30.00
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
PARTS
395:00
MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS INC.
AIR FARE
197-95
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
MISC.REPAIR
40.22
MISC.REPAIR
12.04
MISC.REPAIR
68.64
MISC REPAIR
75.56
MISC REPAIR
34.14
MISC REPAIR
29.00
MISC REPAIR
29.32
MISC REPAIR
85-04
MISC REPAIR
175.77
MISC.REPAIR
5.28
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 11
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
TOTAL: 18,558.11
PUBLIC WORKS -ADMINISTRATION
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC
MISC-REPAIR
67.24
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
MISC.REPAIR
50-88
CINTAS CORP
REPAIR PARTS
6.58
ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
SUPPLIES
679.71
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
APRIL 1998 MEMBER ASSESSMENT
61869.78
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLY
16.82
NOVA CELLULAR
CELLULAR SERVICE
108-57
PHOENIX SEMINARS
SEMINAR
600.00
POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, INC.
SERVICE
757.96
SERVICE
40.00
CLOTHING
797-96
PORTABLE COMM. SPECIALISTS,INC
SUPPLIES
32.50
RED WING SHOE STORE
BOOTS
55.00
R. PAUL VALENTINE
EXPENSES
665.00
VALVOLINE, INC.
OIL SUPPLY
271.89
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
LAB PROCESS
2.52
LAB PROCESS
4.48
PHOTO PROCESS
16-56
LAB PROCESS
16.48
BATTERY
143.94
183-98
WAUKEGAN FIRE DEPT
REGISTRATION
400.00
ZIMMERMAN'S TRU VALUE
SUPPLY
430.00
TOTAL: 18,558.11
PUBLIC WORKS -ADMINISTRATION
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC
REGISTRTION FEE
60.00
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
SERVICE FOR FEB
84.13
CINTAS CORP
UNIFORM
261.18
ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
SUPPLIES
27.50
IPELRA
SEMINAR
50-00
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPP
6.40
STRETCHING INC
EXERCISE GUIDES
55-60
WEARGUARD
CLOTHING
107.38
CLOTHING
27.96
CLOTHING
712.56
CLOTHING
104.90
CLOTHING
50-69
CLOTHING
3-2S
CLOTHING
-211.88
CLOTHING
-278-34
CLOTHING
-59.98
CLOTHING
-9.50
CLOTHING
-178-07
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
N,U%RCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 12
4
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
CLOTHING -202.74
66-23
0
TOTAL0 611-04
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETSBLDGS
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
MAINTENANCE ON ELEVATOR
151.41
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
LOCK
106.26
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
COLD PATCH
776.25
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
EQUIPMENT
730.00
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
144.00
SUPPLIES
144.00
SUPPLIES
144.00
SUPPLIES
144.00
SUPPLIES
144.00
SUPPLIES
144.00
SUPPLIES
144.00
SUPPLIES
390-50
11398.50
R. L. CORTY & COMPANY
PRESSURE HOSES
364.81
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES
COMPUTER CONNECTORS
95.76
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
ANTI -FREEZE
91.56
HENRICKSEN & COMPANY, INC.
CHAIR GLIDES
171-00
HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCT PR
MISC.SUPPLIES,
60.18
NICOR
GAS BILL
188.23
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
MISC.SUPPLY
54.06
MISC.SUPPLY
51-15
MISC.SUPPLY
141.40
MISC.SUPPLY
28.98
MISC.SUPPLY
28.70
MISC. SUPPLY
46.10
MISC. SUPPLY
46.10
MISC. SUPPLY
46.10
MISC. SUPPLY
46.10
MISC. SUPPLY
46.10
MISC.SUPPLY
25.86
MISC.SUPPLY
73.32
MISC.SUPPLY
769.21
MISC.SUPPLY
108.08
MISC.SUPPLIES
61-10
MISC.SUPPLIES
191.10
MISC.SUPPLIES
127.57
MISC.SUPPLIES
83.80
MISC.SUPPLIES
106.95
MISC-SUPPLIES
174.17
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 13
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETSBLDGS
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUBLIC WORKS - FORESTRY/GRNDS
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
B. HANEY AND SONS, INC.
HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCT PR
ILLINOIS TURFGRASS FOUNDATION
MURPHY & JONES INC
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
OrLEARYS CONTR. EQUIP. & SUPP.
L
B & H INDUSTRIES
C4 IMAGING SYSTEMS INC
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
KINDER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PINNER ELECTRIC
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
TRAVEL & SUPP
PEST SERVICE
CONTROL SUPPLY
WATER
WATER
COMPRESSED BAIL
DISPOSAL
MISC.SUPPLIES
MISC-SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP FEES
PORTABLE STAGE
MISC. SUPPLY
PARTS
SUPPLY PAPER/ ROLLS
COPIER CHARGES
ELECTRIC
ROD COUPLERS
MISC. SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES
MISC-SUPPLIES
MISC.SUPPLIRES
TRAVEL SUPP
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MA. INT
SERVICE
...........
2,255.95
3.84
295.00
168-92
9.93
3.31
13-24
TOTAL: 61870.91
94.00
125.00
39.63
13.79
53.42
75.00
323.00
4.60
273.68
TOTAL: 948.74
258.86
12.16
257.64
41.76
228.40
93.94
87.50
185.46
595.30
144.35
13,820.72
1, 000 . 04
TOTAL -, 16f 130.83
List of B Presented r Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 14
VENDOR DE�SCRIPTION AMOUNT
w) 0 a ,k ' rL2
AMERITECH PHONE BILL
PHONE BILL
PHONE BILL
PHONE BILL
PHONE BILL
PHONE BILL
SERVICE
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
SERVICE
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
SERVICE FOR FEB
C I NTAS CORP
FORM
UNIFORM
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
SERVICE
COMP USA
CARTRIDGES
COMPUSERVE, INC
USER CHARGES
CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS
PAINTING
CUES, INC.
PARES
EAST JORDAN IRONWORKS
SEWER PARTS
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FEDERAL EXPRESS
JOSEPH D. FOREMAN& CO.
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
HANSEN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ANNUAL SERVICE
HOLY FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER EBT SCREENING
EBT SCREENING
EBT SCREENING
EBT SCREENING
OCC HL PANEL
UCC HL PANEL
OCC HL PANEL
OCC HL PANEL
OCC HL PANEL
(JCC HL PANEL
OCC HL PANEL
JULIE, INC.
FCAISER PROFESSIONAL A:
PROCESSINGSERVICE
FILM
PROCESSINGFILM
FILM PROCESSING
PHOTO PROCESSIN]
19.01
18.69
28.14
29.21
18.35
145.62
240.08
499.10
183.00
84.13
286.18
5,505.72
230.10
45.51
467.00
553.18
3,970.50
94.00
22.38
521.46
47.00
275.00
331.00
11196.84
1,600.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
44.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
276.00
97.60
54.00
6.25
7.68
11.86
79.79
7.31
17.59
24.33
7.55
M & _ + N:
19.01
18.69
28.14
29.21
18.35
145.62
240.08
499.10
183.00
84.13
286.18
5,505.72
230.10
45.51
467.00
553.18
3,970.50
94.00
22.38
521.46
47.00
275.00
331.00
11196.84
1,600.00
19.00
19.00
19.00
44.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
276.00
97.60
54.00
6.25
7.68
11.86
79.79
7.31
17.59
24.33
7.55
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 15
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
PUBLIC WORKS -WATER/SEWER
MATCO TOOLS
MEYER
MUNICIPAL MARKING DISTR.,INC.
NICOR
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
PC MAGAZINE
F
!ETTY CASH.►WORKS
MI SC . PAR.TS
GRA"V"EL
PAINT
CAS BILL
CCAS BILL
MISC.SUPPLY
MISC.SUPPLY
MISC.SUPPLY
MISC.SUPPLY
MISC.SUPPLY
MISCS'"UPryPyLIUS
MISC . SUPJ. LIES
MISC.SUPPLIES
MISC.SUPPLIES
MISC.SUPPLIES
POSTMASTER B 8
PROSAFETY SAFETY EQUIP
RUST ENVIRONMENT INFRASTR. SANITARY SEWER
SMITH ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, INC. PARTS
SOUND INCORPORATED REPAIR
PRODUCTSVIKING OFFICE
0 elvir
f'0 - 0 1
ILLINOIS RECYCLING ASSOCIATION
REGISTRATION FEE
TOTAL:
PAINT SUPPLIES
PAINT SUPPLIES
Mww'USSE CAR WASH, INC. CAR WASHES
55.78
270.00
529.90
434.00
189.30
227.19
li
416.49
197.54
51.25
50.59
131.22
70.25
92.11
-21.50
455.05
-7.95
45.77
11075.44
25.97
29.83
5.75
35.58
567.00
77.75
31976.00
211.17
111.00
120.55
189.04
78.08
267.12
896.94
254.18
11151.12
604.50
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 16
........... ..... . .
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
69-00
CATCHING FLUIDPOWER
HYDRAULIC HOSE
91.32
DAVE & JIM'S AUTO BODY, INC.
AUTO REPAIR
34.00
WHEEL ALIGNMENT
35.00
WHEEL ALIGNMENT
35-00
104.00
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
29.36
TRUCK PARTS
14.68
TRUCK PARTS
10 5.52
TRUCK PARTS
142.21
TRUCK PARTS
19.56
TRUCK PARTS
68.01
379.34
DTS FLUID POWER CORP
FILTERS
99.41
FILTERS
21.97
121.38
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
AUTO SERVICE
566.40
AUTO SERVICE
47.25
613.65
ILLINI POWER PRODUCTS COMPANY
REPAIRS
11758.11
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
BATTERIES
209.85
KAR PRODUCTS INC
SUPPLY
64.92
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
62.25
PARTS
120.75
PARTS
9.62
PARTS
83.10
PARTS
18.93
PARTS
5.86
PARTS
-40.86
PARTS
7.00
PARTS
42.30
PARTS
37.68
PARTS
500.52
PARTS
10.76
PARTS
16.88
PARTS
54.60
PARTS
616.70
PARTS
109.20
PARTS
184.89
PARTS
20-38
1IB60.56
MIDWAY TRUCK PARTS
AIR FILTER
22.24
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
PARTS
145-00
PARTS
15 5-00
200.00
MUNICIPAL FLEET MANAGERS ASSOC
ANNUAL DUES
25.00
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
MISC.SUPPLY
35.06
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees I
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 17
VENDOR .DESCRIPTION' AMOUNT'
PALMER-JOHNSON
PATTEN INDUSTRIES., INC.
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SOLVENT SYSTEMS INT"L. INC.
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
UPTOWN AUTO SUPPLY
VERMEER-ILLINOIS, INC
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
WELLMAN EQUIPMENT INC
ZIEBART`
XGUT-1710 URNMR1 14 AV q 11111iiqi�
11i i AN -
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOC
ROUSE-RANDHURST SHOP CENT,INCI
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
COMPUTER DISCOUNT WAREHOUSE
STEPHEN FLEMING
GATEWAY 2000 MAJOR ACCTS.,INC.
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
PARKER HOUSE HAIR CARE
RUST ENVIRONMENT & INFRASTR.
71m
SUPPLY
PARTS
AUTO PARTS
MACHINE SERVICE
RECYCLING OIL FILTERS
RENTAL
AUTO PARTS
PARTS
REPAIRS
REPAIRS
OIL FILTER
SERVICE
SERVICE
ELEC BILL
MARCH PAYMENT
APRIL RENT
GAS GRILL
COMUPTER SUPPLIES
REBATE
MONITOR
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
REIMBURSEMENT
WELLER CREEK PROJECT
SANITARY SEWER
SEWER
INVOICE
INVOICE
36.36
1 6 5 . 2 7
36-96
445-75
200.00
3.10
238.01
54.09
36.00
67.50
103.50
71.48
215.00
215.00
430.00
TOTAL: 91361.69
123.68
21916.67
21000.00
TOTAL: 51040.35
21037.00
11437.80
520.00
490.00
11326.44
120.00
21697.94
51000.00
65,482.79
11557-66
10, 519-05
77,559.50
256-37
510.00
List of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 18
VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
]RETIREE PENSIONS
FRED A. NEAL, MD SC
JAMES W RYAN MD
DRUG CARD, INC.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO
GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
R. E. HARRINGTON, INC.
09:1_511��WIAIN
WORKER'S COMP 350-00
EVALO 451.00
TOTAL 801.00
PRESCRIPTION CARD CLAIMS
15,571.18
PAYMENT OF INS CLAIMS—CUSTARD
327.37
REIMBURSEMENT
2rOO8.46
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU
3/12
31458-00
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU
3/17
1$,049-84
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU
3/18
321278-00
MED CLAIMS 3/19
71936.08
MED CLAIMS 3/20
11-413.20
MED CLAIMS 3/23
2o078-13
MED CLAIMS 3/24
13f232-87
MED CLAIMS 212.3
16,932.05
MED CLAIMS 3/25
91104-01
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU
3/26 & 3/27
81496-37
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU
3/30
11�273-35
97,251-90
REPAIRS
380-00
TOTAL: 115r538-91
GRAND TOTAL: 1,459,215.26
List *st of Bills Presented to the Board of Trustees
MARCH 31, 1998 PAGE: 19
SUMMARY BY FUND
01
GENERAL FUND
637,199.40
03
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
21621.77
05
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
14,820.76
07
COMMUNITY DEVELPMNT BLOCK GRNT
16,300.04
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
35.17
55
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMNT CONST FUND
51766-37
59
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
78,079.50
61
WATER AND SEWER FUND
60,886.60
63
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
11025.71
66
VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
27,629.16
67
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
21697.94
68
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
11927.80
69
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
115,538.91
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
87,803.60
72
FIRE PENSION FUND
99,694.40
73
BENEFIT TRUST #2 FUND
2f759.83
79
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
30400,0428-30
11459,215.26
Village of r unt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO BOARD OFTRUSTEES
FROM: MAYOR GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLEY
DATE: APRIL 3, 1998
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS
I hereby nominate the following individuals for appointment/reappointment to the following
Boards and Commissions:
New Appointments,
Lois Brothers
To fill unexpired term of Mary Winkler
1102 West Lincoln
who resigned. Her term would have
H) 392-0854
expired in May 2001.
Judson Strickland
To fill unexpired term of William
906 Whitegate
Donovan who is deceased. His term
H) 398-3806
would have expired in May 2001.
A6 1
New Appointment:
Dale Barbara Draznin
220 South Hatlen
H) 427-1952
0)312/603-6432
Reappointmenis:
To fill unexpired term of Adriane
Lewis who has moved out of the
Village. Her term would have
expired in May 1999.
Leo and Lil Floros, Co -Chairpersons Originally appointed in August
111 North Emerson Street 1993.
H) 255-1985
Board of Trustees
A-Xrp#-�* —rm-r*s�R &&ArVk-m'1'T �a
Page Two.
Individuals nominated have indicated their willingness and interest in serving citizens of
Mount Prospect. Those nominated to serve an additional term have an exemplary record
if prior service. Where applicable, please find Appointee Information Sheets for individuals
possibly not known. Mr. Strickland has served on our now defunct Cable Commission, and
also previously served on the Special Events Commission.
GERALD L. "SKIP" FARLE,
GLF/rcc.
c: Village Manager Michael E. Janonis
Village Clerk Carol Fields
Kenneth Westlake, Chairman, Solid Waste Commission
Lil and Leo Floros, Co -Chairpersons, Special Events Commission
All Department Directors
Date: tT
Boa rd/Com mission Sought
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
APPOINTEE INFORMATION SHEET
One of the more important responsibilities of the Mayor and Board of Trustees is to
nominate and confirm interested and qualified citizens to serve on the various standing and
Ad Hoc Boards, Commissions and Committees that have been created to assist in
accomplishing the business of local government.
Citizens may volunteer for appointment, or be recommended by a present or past Board
member, an existing Committee or Commission member or the public at -large.
Those that have expressed a willingness to serve are typically known to one or more
members of the Board, but not necessarily to all. In an effort to help all Board members
to know a bit more about you and your qualifications, information aboutyou is requested.
Accordingly, you are 'invited to complete the form that follows. If, in your judgment, a
question is asked that you feel is not relevant, please leave it blank. Questions are asked
in the spirit of getting to know you better or to know you for the first time. Obviously, there
are no right or wrong answers so please be candid and factual and understand your
background will only be shared with those who have a need to knowyour qualifications.
Thank you for your cooperation. Please feel free to use additional sheets ofpaper to
complete your answers.
I
ADDRESS o z \)x)col"
TELEPHONE (Residence., (Wollrk)
Number of years a Mount Prospect resident - — ----- -
Prior community service (identify if for Mount Prospect or prior residence 7-B,67111 Nk4
n,(f ,
111111iildo� %
7,ry
. �/� r I I C 1
I 1 J
4n�_4vr -
SC)
EdUcat'rjn and degrees attainad
U
Work experience: PresentEmployer
..r
ype. of work performed
Date: March 15, 1998
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
APPOINTEE INFORMATION SHEET
Board/Commission Sought: Special Events Commission
NAME Dale Barbara Draznin
ADDRESS 220 South Hatlen
TELEPHONE (residence) (847) 427-1952 (work) (312) 603-6432
Number of years a Mount Prospect resident 5 Y2
Prior community service (identify if for Mount Prospect or prior residence):
Member Board of Directors - Friends of the Mount Prospect Public Library
Member Board of Trustees - Mount Prospect Public Library Foundation
Education and degrees attained Master of Social Work - University of Illinois
Certified Employee Benefit Specialist - International Foundation of Employee Benefits
Work Experience: Present Employer Department of Revenue - Cook County
Type of work Performed Manager
Record of past 10 years of employment and work performed
Dept of Revenue - Cook County Manager
Dept of Risk, M'anagement - Cook County Asst to the Director of Employee Benefits
Fibre Craft Materials Corp Customer Service Manager I
Prior elective of appointive office None
Please state reasons why you feel your qualifications would be helpful and useful to the
Village and identify the Board, Commission, or Committee you would be most interested in
serving on. Please list first, second, & third choices in case of limited openings.
As an enthusiastic and goal oriented indivi'dual, I enjoy working on pro"ects. As a volunteer', I have
coordinated a variety of highly successful events and activities for the groups ar)d organ I tzations I
have bean associated with.
The activities sponsored by the Special Events Commission are a window to IVIL'unt Prospect. For
some people, our village is viewed primarily through events such as the Celestial Celebration and
Shining Star Awards, the July 4 Parade, or Welcome to Mount Prospect.
Loo, A U A 10
I
E
WFIREAS
VI* ees,,, shnibifsl,and floversaye a, greet pert, of the, see llic beaLlty'of our
illage and, of our Nat'llon, in addition, u goodsoil and healthy plant
esiseI * i al to, t he gene ral economy and agricutture, of our Nation*
Iii -Be which, is nt
W`HEREAS, trees, shrubs and plant -fife in general are among God's gifts to many
and should be preserved and appreciated,; and,
WEEREAS, the planting of trees in Mount Prospect will also help consery
energy use by shading and cooling buildings and pavement. I
ill`ow, THEREFORE, 1. Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount
Prospect, do hereby proclaim Fri'day, April 24. 1998, as ARBOR D,,A'Y in the
Vi-llage of Mou nt Prospect and'u e ed,ucators to teach our youth the benefits
derived from plant life and encourage the residents of the Village of Mount
Prospect to continue to plant and maintain such plant life throughout the Village.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated: April 7, 19S*1
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: APRIL 2, 1998
�p I'll " N
For the thirteenth (1 3th) consecutive year the Village of Mount Prospect has been named
as a "Tree City USA". Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Sandra Clark will be in
attendance at the April 7, 1998, Village Board meeting to present the award to the Mayor.
Also, the American Public Works Association (APWA) has selected Sandra Clark as this
year's recipient for their Exceptional Performance Award for- Journalism. APWA is a
national organization headquartered in Kansas City, Kansas, and has nearly 30,000 active
members. Deputy Director of Public Works Sean Dorsey submitted the "Trees of Mount
Prospect", brochure for consideration by both the local Chicago Chapter as well as the
National Headquarters, for their Journalism Award. The brochure not only received the
local Chicago Chapter Award, but also received the National Award. Ed Laudenslager,
President of the Chicago Chapter of APWA will be in attendance at the April 7, 1998
Village Board meeting to present Sandy her award. Sandy was previously recognized at
the Chicago Chapter's March Awards Luncheon and will receive her national recognition
at the APWA's International Public Works Congress in September, in Las Vegas,
Nevada.
Glen R. Andler
CC*' Deputy Director of Public Works Sean Dorsey
Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Sandy Clark
x:\files\frontoff-\admin\apwaawrd
WHEREAS, child abuse prevention is a community problem and finding solutions
depends on involvement among people throughout the community including the
courts; and
WHEREAS, statistics of children who are abused and neglected escalate each
year, with the number of reported child abuse cases in the State of Illinois were
140,000 last year; and
WHEREAS, the effects of child abuse are felt by the entire community and need
to be addressed appropriately; and
WHEREAS, effective child abuse prevention programs succeed because of
partnerships created among the courts, social service agencies, schools,
religious organizations, law enforcement agencies, and the business community;
and
WHEREAS, Parents Anonymous, a prevention program offering positive
alternatives to help break the cycle of abuse, is sponsoring Illinois' Blue Bow
Campaign to heighten awareness of the need to support families; and
WHEREAS, all citizens should become more aware of child abuse and its
prevention within the community and to become involved in supporting parents
to raise their children in a safe, nurturing environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect,
do hereby proclaim the month of April, 1998 as CHILD ABUSE AWARENESS
MONTH and call upon all citizens to increase their participation in efforts to
prevent child abuse, thereby strengthening the communities in which we live.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
4,
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated: April 7, 1998
flmnz�
Mayor G. L. Farley
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mayor Farley,
Illinois Parents Anonymous is pleased to announce its 4th
annual Blue Bow Campaign. Will you join us during the month of
April to increase public awareness of child abuse and inform
parents about the support available through P.A.?
The national blue ribbon campaign began seven years. ago
when a Virginia grandmother tied a blue ribbon to the antenna of
her car as a reminder of the bruised body of her grandson lost
to chiid abuse. In Illinois, nearly 140,000 reports of child abuse
were documented last year. Your participation could help
children in your own community where a Parents Anonymous
group is being planned by CEDA Northwest.
Chief Pavlock has agreed to tie blue bows on all the squad
cars and the police social worker will be passing out literature
at the senior center. Will you kick off Mt. Prospect's campaign
by reading the enclosed proclamation at the April 7th board
meeting? Together we can make a difference in children's lives.
Sincerely,
�� t
Bonnie Baselt
Regional Coordinator
North Central Re2ion, 743) 1 Astor Avenue, Hanover Park, Illinois 60103 630/837-6445
.2
!:a
WHEREAS, underage drinking is the number one drug problem among the
nation's youth; and
WHEREAS, the use of alcohol is associated with the leading causes of death and
injury among youth, including motor vehicle crashes, homicides and suicides; and
WHEREAS, juvenile crime, violence and poor academic performance are closely
linked with underage drinking; and
WHEREAS, approximately 2/3 of teenagers who drink still report that they can
buy their own alcoholic beverages; and
WHEREAS, passage of other laws to reduce underage drinking and enforcement
of those laws is a community and state responsibility.
wr W
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated: April 7, 1998
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
state, of Illinois
Circuit Court of Cook county
Third Municipal District
Margaret Stanton McBride
presiding Judge
Mayor Gerald Farley
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Dear Mayor Farley:
2121 Euclid Road
Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008
(847) 818-2286
Fax- (847) 818-2766
TTD: (847) 818-2075
March 20, 1998
is, Education Athace.
'O'
April has been designated as Alcohol Awareness Month by the 11firl'o',1 it
The Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Traffic Safety,,. has awarded, the Ci"rcu" COUrt,
-ificalty
to join with the conununity to work toward greater traffic safety , s�p cc
of Cook County a grant 0
in t-, mg und,
the n er, of a1cohot-retated ata car, crashes as wel't as �the t' suances, of dr�'V'* er tb,C
o�wermg, uinb
1-ty will focI,u,,s upon underage drinking - It is a fact
influence. DurIng Aprill, the traffl,c safety com, mun'l and streets.
that underage drinking leads to serious fan-dly consequences as well as unsafe highways
'deraboll, the enclosed procIam-nation to be made by yourself and
May''I suggest, for �your cons"t
tion
ge alcohol consump
your Councfl, as an, indication of your con finutng resolve to prevent. undera.-I
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
larIgaret Stanton McBride
Presiding Judge
Third Municipal District
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the safety of the bufl,dings we occupy daily is essential to the health, safety and
6
welfare of the citizens of our cc)mmunity; and
WHEREAS, among our most, fundamental laws are those whichProvide standards for the safe
0',
construction of buldings in vvh'ich people live, work and play; and
0
WHEREAS, for construction and building codes to be effecitive and enforcedl, understanding and
cooperatt i on must exl*st between code officia4s and the people they serve* and
WHEREAS, through the effOrt'S of code officials
I worldwide, and their cooperative relafionsftip
wit, the construction 'industry., the admini'strationof health and life -safety stairidards is assured
and 11
WHEREAS,, unifts, of government,, as wellas
I i
togetber to, promote the use of' bufld" various PrOfeSsional organizations, are joi`njing
I ing and construct*
through, the observation of In'ternational Building S , afe ton codes for a lifett"me! of building safety
ty'Week- and
t
WHEREAS,,, the theme otInteMational Building Safety Week for 1998has been established as
"For a Safer Tomorrow.
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the. Village of MounPM'
t sPett, do hereb�
'Y
prod,ai'm the week of April 5 - 111 1998 as INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SAFETYWEEK lurge
10,
all citizens to recognize the importance of building and construction codes and the role of �the
dedicated code officials in administering those co,des.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated: April 7, 1998
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
*RDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAG E CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
S CT"I Nom. That in accordance with Su bsection A OfS Section n 11108, of C hapter 13 of 'th e V11, g e Code
of Mount Prospect, as amended, the Corporate Authorities, shall determine flie number of Liquor L,icenses;
available in each Classification and shall establish a list spe,,cifying the number of Liquor, Ucenses, authorized.
Said list is hereby amended by decreasing the number of ClassS, Liquor Licenses by one (1) Sablorelto, I'm.,
d/b/a Marion's 11, 2364 South Elmhurst F:Zoad. Said list "is, as follow,&-,
W
One (1)
Class A License
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Nine (9)
One (1)
Class C Licenses
Two (2)
Class D License
One (1)
Class E Licenses
One (1)
Class G License
Zero (0)
Class H License
Zero (0)
Class M License
Nineteen (19)
Class P License
Fifteen (15)
Class R Licenses
One (1)
Class S, Licenses
Eight (8)
Class T License
Class W Licenses
That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of,. 1,1998.
Village President
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
E, totri,
Number
A
Mrs. P & Me
I
B
Dumas Walter's; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Alve,e's Liquors; Balzano, liquors; Dominick's
(83 & GoIold E,agle Liquors; Jay Liquors;
0
Mt. Prospect Liquorsi, Osco 'Drugs,
Walgreens (83 and Golf); Walgreens
9
(Mt, Prospect Plaza)
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
1
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
2
Banquet Hail
G
Mt. Prospect Park District-Golf Course
1
H
Zanie's
I
0
M
0
P
R
Artemis; Chungkiwa Restaurant; Cuisine of India;
Fellini; Giordano's (Elmhurst Road);
House of Szechwan; lzakaya Sankyu; LaTejanita;
Little America; Magic Dragon; Mandarin Way;
Nina Restaurant; Pusan; Sakura; Sunrise; Sun's Chinese
Restaurant; Taqueria Fiesta; Torishin; Yasuke
19
S
, sEl
Applebeel,� sBella Capri; East Side Nla� riolw Sombrero;
Jake"s Pizza; Jameson's CharhouseI i, Kampai;
The Loft; New Shin Jung; Nikki D'sCharhouse;
Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant; Pap's Grill & Bar;
15
Retro Bistro; Rokudenashi; Sam's Place
T
Thunderbird Lanes
1
W
Frankie's Fast Food- Los Arco s Restaurant;
T
M r, Be of & Pizza P eteI s Sta n dwich Pal ace
Photo's Hot Dos;Pizza Hut; Rosati's P"
8
Tedino's
80
17 FAX 847 439 2502 Bradtke & Zimmermann
BHADT:KM & ZXXXIMINA- N, LTiD.
ATTORMSYS.&T LAW
sunne e a o
1100 SOUTH 9120LBURST NA&D
MOUNT PAOSPEGT, IIJ INOIS 60 0 5 a
JOHN J. Z09MCKRMANW, TZLEPRONE (847) 4MI3-2500
MOVA&L P. Z RAOSMMLE (847) •4 -JO -2502
AUG Mb. DX"'TIM, ('Yorke -levo)
March 31,,1998
v1`26 Facs W'v-wv,4 e, and Regular Mail
(847)3 92- 60022,
Mehael Janom*s
Village,M,,,anager
lage of Mt.Prospect
100 South,, Einmon Street
ML Prospect, IL 60056
Ike: Pefifion fbr� Rccepdon to the Devel
0i ment Code
Jeff& Barbara Radebaugh, 408 S* Lust
Dear Nft. Janonis:
I, A a all I
ince%,
9002/002
CM COUNSEL
P.RWU4 W. jm4TSCH
=,%XN MOORM GRAY-
jCrffN H. Gjal-21'I J&
Nffwl�s I
VC: BMW, MA, VffIaP,A!t=ey, (vift fax oifly (312) 984-6444)
miW, hiam c0owy C
I I i v -,O�X Dev-DIM tOr Oda fax only (8 47) 818-5312
Baibara, and Jeff Rad6auo,
CAF/
CAR
3/20/98
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY
GEW -'AI LY -LOCATED AT 408 SOUTH'HI'LUS1
WHEREAS, Jeffrey S. Radebaugh and Barbara A Radebaugh (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) are the u."',-iers of the property generally located at 408 South Hi Lusi
(hereinafter referred to a. -,)object Property) and legally described as r,.)ilows:
Parcel 1:
Lot 5 in Block 9 in Prospect Park Country Club Subdivision, being a
Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter of Section 11 and the south 15 acres
of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, township 41 North,
Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat of said
subdivision recorded July 10, 1926 as Document Number 9335147, in Cook
County, Illinois
Parcel 11:
Lot 6 in Block 9 (except that part of said Lot 6 in Block 9 lying southwest of
a straight line drawn between the angle corners of said lot formed by the
Northwest and North lines and the Southeast and South lines thereof) in
Prospect Park Country Club Subdivision, being a Subdivision of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 11 and the south 15 acres of the East Half of
the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, township 41 North, Range 11, East of
the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat of said subdivision
recorded July 10, 1926 as Document Number 9335147, in Cook County,
Illinois
WHEREAS, the Petitioners are requesting an exception from Section 16.109.A of Chapter
16 (Development Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as provided in Section
16.111, which exception will allow the construction an addition to the existing home over
the lot line dividing Lot 5 from Lot 6; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the
request for an exception from Section 16.109.A of Chapter 16 (Development Code) for the
Subject Property at their regular meeting on March 4, 1998, said request being the subject
of PC -01- 8 and by a unanimous vote recommended to the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village to grant the exception from Chapter 16 as requested; and
PC -01--98
408 S. Hi LuSli
Page 2 of 2
1
ATA dft
All, 01
41&
goo
4* M, RW all
AYES:
IM"
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this 1 day of 11998.
. . . ........... — ------ . . .........
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
BH/caf
3/12/98
ORDINANCE NO.
11110
age
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE. 0,
That Section 20.104.13 of Article 11 entitled "Sale or Possession of Certain
Animals Prohibited" of Chapter 20 (Animals) of the Village Code,, as amended, is hereby further
amended in its entirety and substitute with the following; so that hereafter said Secti"on 20.104.13
shall be and read as follows:
B, No person shall keep, maintain and/or harbor any live swine, pigs,
horses or cattle within the corporate limits of the Village,
unless such keeping, maintenance and/or harboring is donepursuant to
the business of providing veterinary or animal hospital services that are in
compliance with Village regulations. "
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the mannerprovided by law.
AYES:
I
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of.1998.
00 0i
ATTEST:
---------------
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
... .........
Gerald L. Farley, Village Pres - i dent
Viflage of M'ount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager
rc 4
William J. Cooney Jr., Director of Community Development
April 3, 1998
Town Centre LLC Proposal - Ad Hoc Committee Recommendation
The Do, mma. ''Redevelopment Ad, Hoc Commlittee co�nve,neid a special meeting immediatel
* , 9 t, hC V iii It y
followin 111age Board's Marcni 2.4th, Coninufttee 4 the Whole meeting to conduct final
I
deliberations, and to make tMr fbrmal recommendation regarding the Town Centre LLC proposal.
The Committee discussed the pros and cons of the Town Centre LLC proposal and heard comments
from individuals in the audience. They agreed that the Town Centre LLCproject team had done a
very good job of incorporating the majority of the Committee's concepts into theirplan.
After further deliberations, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend to the Village Board
that the Village enter into negotiations with Town Center LLC- Their recommendation was conditioned
upon the resolution of the following issues:
The architectural and pedestrian character illustrated in Phases II and III of the Town Centre., LLC,
proposal be incorporated into Phase I.
2. Efforts must be made to enhance the rear facades of the existing buildings along the north side of
Busse Avenue.
3. Additional retail be added to the triangle parcel south of Busse Avenue alld that the retail uses be
integrated into a single building or unified buildings.
4. Consideration be made to retain the existing afi-ected businesseso Particularly oil, the triangle parcel,
0 # 0
to ensure that they, bave the opportutifty to renlain, viable busiesses in the downtomi-f[.
5. Considerafibn ofthe below grade parking should, be made in an effort to decrease the hei
111"ght of the
�proposed, condoiii bul"Id W',gs Wh,,ere possible. The maximum height of the condominium
bulfldbhp shall, not ed, 93 f6et (ex*sfi glie ght of 'Mirst Chicago Bank Bui1di"ng). As specified
in the Downtown District Strategic Plan, an adopted elvnent of the Coi,nprehensive Plan.
6. The developer continue to explore the feasibility of placing retail/services space along Wille Street.
7. Should the developer be involved in Phase 111, a larger unified Village Green should be incorporated
into that phase.
T
The Commission therefore forwards this recommendation to the Village Board for their review and
consideration at their April 7th meeting. Members of the Committee and staffthimeeting to answer any questions related to this matter.will be present at s
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN AD HOC COMAMITTEE
Minutes
March 24, 1998 Special Meeting
Chairman,Michael H' '
offinaticalledthe special, meeting ofthe Downtown, Redevelopment Strateg"o plan
Hbo, Committeeto, orderat 9,1:57 p.m. on Tluesday� March 24,11998, M*,i the 2nd F1oor Confbten I ,
011
lage 14all, 100 South Emerson, Street; Mount:,Prospecl� Illinois. 'ce,Room, I
Roll Call
Present Upon Roll Call: Chairman Michael Hoffman, Plan Commission Chairman
Norm Kurtz, Economic Development Chairman
David Lindgren, Economic Development Member
Richard Lohrstorf�r, Trustee
Hal Predovich, BDDRC. Chairman
Daniel Nocchi, Trustee
William Reddy, Plan Commission Member
Jean Reibel, Resident
Keith Youngquist, BDDRC Member
Members Absent: William Tucker, Resident
Staff Present: William Cooney, AICP, Community Development Director
Michael Blue, AICP, Community Development Deputy Director
Daniel Ungerleider, AICP, Planning Coordinator
Judy Connolly, Planner
Others Present: See attached sign -in sheet
14, If
Chairman Hoffinan asked ` therewere corredions tothe thinutes, of the March 17p 1998 meeting.
WilliamR made a, motion, seconded; by''Nbnn, Kurtz, to ap
were approved una =*ously. , prove the min s as, submitted. The minutes
Chairman Hoffinan explained that the proposal submitted by, Ben Coir had been withdrawn'by def4alt since
the development team for Ben -Cor had declined toniake a, presentaflon at the 3/24/9,81, Committ e
11", ee of ffi
Whole meeting. He noted that the Ad Hoe Committee would bedeciding whether to recom mlendthat the
Village Board proceed with negotiations with "Town, Cenfte, LLC,, o�r to,,reject the Town, Centre, LLC,
proposal altogether. Chairman Hoffinan expressed that he felt the Town, Centre presentation, was,,ve
thorough and that he was pleased with the revisions made to the lans p 6 ly
p rtorto, the presentation.,
Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes
March 24, 1998 Page 2
Mr. David Lindgren stated that the presentation solidified his desire to require that the design elements in
Town Centre's proposed Phases H and HI be brought into Phase I. Mr. William Reddy concurred with Mr.
Lindgren's assessment and added that this should a priority recommendation to the Village Board. Mr.
Lindgren continued that he was pleased that the developers had made other changes to the plans in
accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendations. He noted that he understood the developer did
not feel there was enough space for additional retail in Phase I of the development project proposal. The
triangle, south of Busse Avenue, is an opportunity to address the relocation of existing businesses that are
impacted by the redevelopment of this portion of the downtown.
Mr. Reddy noted that, during previous discussions, the Ad Hoc Committee had recommended the retail
buildings located in the block south of Busse Avenue be incorporated into one or two larger buildings. He
added he was pleased that the developers are local and they seem to understand the realities of the needs of
this community. He also added that the redevelopment plans need to be modified to better address the backs
of the remaining existing Busse Avenue retail spaces.
Mr. Norm Kurtz stated that he concurred with the discussions thus far. He noted that the hobby shop on
Busse Avenue is a viable business and any redevelopment of this area needs to be sensitive to the business
on Busse Avenue. He stated that he felt too much parking has been proposed for the block south of Busse
Avenue and asked if it would be possible to reconfigure that block so it better addresses the hobby shop and
other Busse Avenue businesses without raising the rents. This plan must, be sensitive to the existing
businesses.
Mr. Hal Predovich noted that the proposal does not illustrate the type of Village Green originally described
in the Downtown Strategic Plan. He expressed that more financial information supporting this development
needs to be provided before the Village can enter into an agreement with a developer. Ms. Jean Reibel
concurred, stating it is difficult to review the proposal without the supporting financial data. Mr. Lindgren
noted that the Ad Hoc Committee's job was to create the parameters for the redevelopment, not necessarily
to review the financial projections for that development. He added that it will be the Village Board's and
staff's responsibility to address the financial arrangements during the developer agreement negotiations. The
Ad Hoc Committee's charge is to reject or support the proposal by the developer.
Chairman Hoffman asked the Committee if they would be making a recommendation for Phase I or for all
threephases as proposed by the developer. He noted that the RFP requested development proposals for only
Phase I. The Town Centre proposal before them appears to be condominium based. He asked that the
Village Board, and, staff" negotiatefir only Phase I at this, time,, with pottentlial for Phase II andPhase to
VA, 'o ensure ihat thedevelopers follow
be discussed, later. He, also noted that, guarantees, will need to, be made t
through with the entire project.
Mr. Keith Youngquist noted that there were many issues that needed to be addressed for Phases 11 and III.
The Ad Hoc Committee should be discussing Phase I only. Mr. Youngquist stated that he likes the proposed
development, and that the proposed developer is a strong group with strong convictions. He added that he
was pleased that the developer had attempted to address the Ad Hoc Committee's original review comments
and that he had no problem recommending this development team without the supporting financial data at
this time. Given the circumstances and history of Mount Prospect's downtown redevelopment efforts, he
feels the development team has provided enough information for him to feel comfortable. Mr. Kurtz
Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes
March 24, 1998 Page 3
concurred that the local developer will not likely walk away and that they appeared confident during their
presentation.
Mr. Predovich noted that he felt the developer had caught the flavor of the Ad Hoc Committee's vision for
the downtown.
Mr. Kurtz stated that the Village Green in Phase M needs to be better addressed when that, p)1ase comes W*to
play. Mr. Reddy asked the Committee if height was still an'llssu,e.l He ai&ed that, consi,deratioti, be g
0 & iven to
requmng the developer to review the feasibility of providing bel grad parking to decrease the height of
those condominium buildings. Trustee Nocchi noted that the proposed, eight story condominjum building
would be the same height as the existing First Chicago Bank, Buildffig. He, added thathe found it, interesting,
that the developer was proposing to purchase the bailk build'n W
I ig, an, d,, thatthe First ChIcagoBank Building
opens many opportunities for different places to locate the Village, ll/Senlior Center facilities. 1w. Kurtz
expressed that the bank building does not portray the image envisioned for Village Hall.
Chairman Hoffman opened the floor for public discussion. Tom Neitzke expressed that he was concerned
with the proposed development plans. He noted that the character of Busse Avenue currently is isolate
the surrounding areas and the fact that it has not been changed createsthe character, that exists, today. T here,
will not be retail located along the south side of Busse Avenue. Plans need to be more sensitiveto the history
of Busse Avenue and that the expensive parking lot located south of Busse Avenue, "in, the proposed plan, w"11
not be conducive to the existing character of this area.
Donald Re nd' asked, that the Committee be concerned that the developergroup 'is, a, limited liabIll
# P, 0 ty
co orator and thatthe Committee needs to ensurethatthis corporation is sound. Mr. Reddy explained that
'the AdHoo Co Ott responsible,dr the design of the proposalandthat the: Village Board, will review,
the strengths of the corporation, as well as, the feasibility of the project.
0
Carom
l Tortorello asked the Coy: 11"fadditionnal d,tscussi , on regarding the architeetural style of the
condominium buildings Isnee-ded. The Committee responded that one of the recommendations . will be that
the Phase1development have, similar arch itectural, characteristics shown in Phases 11 and 111.
Mr. Kurtz emphasized that the developer be required to do eve ryth,ingthey can to retain, existing businesses
on both sides of Busse Avenue. He also noted he was disappointed that new retail is not being illustrated
on Wille Street. Chairman Hoffman stated that he did, not flike, the revised site plan proposed, 'by flie
ed. , and
developer which illustrated retail on Wille Street. Trustee Nocchustated that Wille Street, nes rata i, I
it would be a natural progression given the Clock Tower commercial and the Busse Avenue retail located
in that area. He also expressed that he was disappointed with the amount of retail beingproposed in the
triangle. He said there should be more.
Mr. Lindgren noted that the proposed retail spaces on the triangle parcel are in character with the retail
spaces along the north side of Busse and that the new retail spaces configuration improved the opportunities
for the existing spaces as opposed to hiding them.
Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Minutes
March 24, 1998 Page 4
stated that their proposal appears to be based on the financing of 200 units of condominiums and that the
quality of the development and the architectural elements proposed will depend on the height of the building
and the number of units allowed. Mr. Cooney, Director of Community Development, agreed with Mr.
Youngquist's assessment and noted that the design elements being discussed this evening will require
additional dollars and, therefore, be contingent upon the developer meeting the needed density requirements.
Mr. Predovich noted that the developer may be receptive to the comments and, if they are not, the Village
can re -issue the RFP and seek another developer. -
Mr. Youngquist stated he was supportive of the developer, he was supportive of the 200 units being proposed
and of the eight story buildings. He added that density is an important element to a successful central
business district such as downtown Mount Prospect.
Don Reindl noted that the value of the project affects the price of the land.
Chairman Michael Hoffman asked that a motion be made to recommend that the Village enter negotiations
with the developer. Bill Reddy made the motion that the Ad Hoc Committee recommend the Village enter
into negotiations with Town Centre, LLC, for Phase I of the Downtown Strategic Plan, subject to the
following conditions:
The architectural and pedestrian character illustrated in Phases II and III of the Town Centre, LLC,
proposal be incorporated into Phase I.
2. Efforts must be made to enhance the rear facades of the existing buildings along the north side of
Busse Avenue.
3. Additional retail be added to the triangle parcel south of Busse Avenue and that the retail uses be
integrated into a single building or unified buildings.
41
4. Consideration be made to retain the existing affected businesses, particularly on the triangle parcel,
to ensure that they have the opportunity to remain viable businesses in t1w downtown.
5. Consideration of the below grade parking should be made in an effort to decrease the height of the
proposed condominium buildings where possible. The maximum height of the condominium
buildings shall not exceed 93 feet (existing height of First Chicago Bank Building). As specified
in the Downtown TIF District Strategic Plan, an adopted element of the Comprehensive Plan.
6., The developer continue to explore the feasibility of placing retail/services space along Wille Street.
7, Should the developer be involved M* Phase III, a larger unified Village Green should be incorporated
into that phase.
Keith Youngquist seconded the motion.
Upon Roll Call: AYES,: Hoffman, Kurtz, Lindgren, Lohrstorfer, Predovich,
T Nocchi, Reddy, Reibel, Youngquist,
4
NAYS.
Ad Hoe Committee Meeting Minutes
March 24, 1998
Chairman " Hof finan exprmsed, thatite was pleased W'Ith, the, PrOgreSs Of U'le Committee and thanked the
groy
f
,6r; their work. RDnbted there isan 0 pen Ibuse SchedWed, fbr Tuesday', Mamli, 3 1, 1998 fiv
4#00 pm
to 8:00i pl.,M,,,,a,,t the Sentor Center, Th,e Ad Hoe Committee 'is invi"te
A motion for adjournment was made and unanimously approved at 11:07 p.m.
Daniel Ungerleider, AICD, Planning Coordinator
�XWSMt$COMEV\P,LNGWI)I)ROTW%,M)EVU�-24-9g.MIN
"VILLAGE OF ROSPECT
Community Development Department - Planning Division
I
"oo
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONI[Sq VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DANIEL UNGERLEEDER, A1CP) PLANNING COORDINATOR
DATE: APRIL 1, 1998
SUBJECT: ZBA-1-989 1768 W. GOLF ROAD/MOUNT PROSPECT COMMONS SHOPPING
CENTER/CONDITIONAL USE TO INCREASE THE GHT OF AN EXISTING
MONOPOLE ANTENNA STRUCTURE FROM 701 TO 1201
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a request for a Conditional Use
to increase the height of an existing monopole antenna structure from 70' feet to 120'. The site is located
at 1768 W. Golf Road, behind the Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center at the northwest comer of
Golf and Busse Roads.
The Zoning Board of Appeals heard the request during tetr meeflilg, on March 26, 1998., Judy Connolly,
Planner, summarized the petitioner's request and staffs report'. Tlie proposed change ilk, providefor, coo*,
location and enable at least three carriers to locate on the structure. A T &T1 wil I occu,
, I py flie first two po,,sitions
at 120' and 100' respectively and Sprint PCS expressed t*,'nterestin co4ocating, at the third, 6
1 position 1, at 80
The request was reviewed according to current code requirements. Staff recommended approval of the
Cond"I"'n""onal Usesubject to the condititons listed, in the staff report. These, condth",ons require the petitiOn.,er,
tossafisf
I y the best possible circumtstances for, siting a tower. The petitioner is, a, of the conditions and
agreed to all conditions except 49, which, is a condition that prohibits AT&T and any other tenants from
Influenci"n,g any legislation which seeks exemption, from any emergency 911 surcharge fees for emergency
d1spatch services,., The: petitioner agreed to provide a written statement add1resstngthat condition, (see
attached).,
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the petitioner's request and found that the proposed Conditional Use
meets, the standardsfbr cond"itional'uses. T, he, Zonlng Board of Appeals, voted,4-0 to recommend, approval
0 14 .for for a, Conditional Use to increase,ffie height of an existing monqpole sftuct ure from 70' to 120 "" at 1768'W.
Golf Road, 'ject to, the first eight (8) conditions listed in the staff report and the
I Case 'No. ZBA- 1-9 8, sub
petitioner's statement be provided as a substitute for Condition #9.
I concur:
William J. Cb,oney, A1CF__
Director of Community Development
F:\U5ERS\COMDEV\PLNMZBA\Z]3AI98MJ.doc
CASE NUMBER: ZBA-1-98
TITLE: 1768 W. Golf Road/Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center
Conditional Use to raise the height of an existing monopole antenna structure from 70' to
1209
LOCATION MAP
Prepared By: Community Development Department - Planning Division
April 1, 1998 t
Fi I (A 0 0
a104 6 m
Michael Janonis
Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Dear Mr. Janonis:
Wireless customers are vigilant in reporting
11
emll
ergenzi,els with, 18 * ,
nu " on calls, to 9, I'l orother,
emergency numbers made per year. The 50,000 phone calls made, nafi`onAlle4
y ach day u,sing
wireless phones is possible only because of the existence of cellsi'tes, Greater reliabl"'I''ity, and
broader availability of wireless 911 calls arepossillble,m"th addittional cell sites.
egti o ' ati ons between witelesls, carriers and Illinois' public safety community, on a bill containing
the Is ifics of this doncppt aft ongoing. We are doing idl,,wje can to assthe 1111 nois
Pecl,
U"re that
General Assembly Wi 11 enact a, w irele&s 0 11 bi'll this year.
If you have any additional questions or concerns, please contact me directly at 312/441-2027.
a
'hris her J. Dunn
Din for of External Affairs - Central Region
-OD-
Q�10 Recycled Paper
MMUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF "PEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-01-98
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEMIBERS PRESENT:
F 0
AII 63�1
I WIN ip
Hearing Date: March 26, 1998
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
1768, W. Golf Rd./Mount Prospect Commons Shopping
Center,
March 9, 1998
Cond'Itional "Use to, raise the height, of an existin
9
Monopole AntennaStnticture from 70" To 1201
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson
Ronald Cassidy
Arlene Juracek
Jack Verhasselt
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem
Marshall Ponzi*
Chairperson Skowron introduced Case ZBA-01-98,,1768 W. Golf Rd./Mount Prospect Commons Plaza,
a request for a Conditional Use to increase the height of an existing monopole from 701 to 1201. The Village
Board decision is final for this case.
The facility is located behind the Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center, in the northwest section of
the lot. The shopping center is located at the northwest comer of Golf and Busse Roads. Clearwater Park
is located to the north and the west of the site,
Zoning Board of Appeals IBA -01-98
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson Page 2
The current Zoning Ordinance requires the petitioner to obtain a Conditional Use for this ground mounted
antenna tower since it exceeds 70' in height. Ms. Connolly reported that the petitioner stated the taller tower
will reduce the need to construct additional towers in the area and this enhancement will have a positive
influence on the development of this area. The subject property is designated for community -commercial
use. The proposed use is consistent with this designation.
thandds , na
Ms. Con, nolly notedthat the petitioner s application, sufficient',ty add dress est arf6r,aCondifiol,,se
Use. Tliereforestaff, recommends "approval of a,Co,,nd,,it,,*Iona,'I'U,,gle;t,,o"se the heigb t ofan exist
rat i ing monopole
antenna structure from 70'to 1201 for Case No. ZBA-01-198,1768 Golf Road su�ject to the conditions lute
in Staff's report.
Anthony'U—llo Aftorney represe, ntin 1, r�, for, AT& TWfireless Services,
Ig AT*T,, Orlando, DiVila, R—&,F'Eng*nee
M'urray, Lewison, Site Acquisition Manager, for AT&T' Wireless, ServIces-were swom
'Mir. U,110 gave,, testimony. AUTI'S-opera g a,,,'PCS, w Jr, elcommunicatless, ions systemin, this area. 111is system
ustomers. AT&Thas made every effort,
uIzes, ugita ice se ry ice to its c
util d'*' I tecti,nology, toprovide wul`vless voi
* 'U # , as
to, have their sites, as uno''Umsive as, possible. Mir." , Jlo, explamiedthe necessityfor, incre , ing the height of
Lellioiiden the audiience Ms. Cirndy
die, monopole, M*, order to keep u withincreased, deman ds. Mr,' tifted in
,P
Property Man, (ager for the Rosemont area Spri"nt PCS, and said she would be available to answer
Trai,norr,
questi"ons after, hispresentiation. Sprint Will be, sin the monopole, too. Mr. Lello said the alternative to
'd, o, bold .another at a different location.
extend ingthe heigh t) of his towerwoulbe t
,
Orlando DeVila, Senior R&F Engineer for AT&T was called forward to testify. He used computer generated
14 r, " ed e o "'ginal
P lot's �to, explam, (1), how estimated coverage for theMount, Prospect, amamas, detenuin, atthe din, the ri
ins 01resent, talled., Paid, (2) how the, need, for the increaSedlower height to accommodate pands.
future coverago was detenum"ed. Customer complaints,regardm*g call degradation, And, drqppedcalls, led thezin
to do a drive test of the Chicago network which showed a coverage, h1olein this area. Obstu ctionshave been,
It
created I by tireesand buildings s# m,,ce, the original" estimate. They determined the necessary height by using
a, crane and a, cellula antenna, attilie 120' he"i gb t.
ON,
Cynthia, T rainor Pro porty'Ma na or for Sprint PCS, located, at, 9801 W. HIg,g*Ws Road, Rosemont, IL, was
IMI, ey would co -locate with,,AT&Tat, this, site:.
sworn in and gav'etest* ony thatdi
d tle exaftiple of atornado
Ronald Cassidy asked how these woul
anterwas d witlistand, a o. tornadM,.'UlIo cite th
that hit Wheaton , IL, and lifted, a several thousandpound transfomer �from the ground but,all cell, towers,
withstood the high winds with no ill effect.,
I
As his final comment, Mr. Lello informed Board members that AT&T staff had met with Community
the cond,it,�'tons,,req"ue,,ste,d, before 'issuance ofa permit. W. Lello stated, that they,
Development, st—aff regarding , , I te i �at
'to, "the ninth. , Mr. te'lono d, th
'were, in, agreement regarding the first e'igh-t,',co�tidit"'Ioii�s",�'but couldn.,otagree
ifi 's
,AT&T'I*s working di, Igently in Sprm*gfiield to attain a bit.1, addressm,"S enhanced 9 1, 1 ser vice. 'He said, AT&, T,
re, to, but'It is, not, somethingthil,
position, at stime is , consistent with what the'V"Ilage is askingthem, to, adhe
0 hey can be held , to,'becausethere are m, any *issues, that come, "'Into these negotiations. M, r. Lebo, saild A,T&-T
Iti, wiffi, respect
lonand not, pursue a bargaining pos* on,
iont, asking
feels,fl,us condit" s 'them to take, a part" ular po�sit
to enhanced 911. Mr. Lello said AT&T also thinks that litem, 9 is Separate from their conditional Use
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-01-98
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson Page 3
application and should no be intertwined. He further stated that Mount Prospect is the only municipality to
date to make such a request.
Mr. Lello read the following statement from AT&T's External Affairs Department.- "AT&T Wireless Services
is committed to providing its customers with 911 emergency service, AT,, &,T agrees in, prtnclple to levy, a
^v legislation .* 11
surcharge on our customers and are supportive of iegisiation that would impose a pass,throug hi
0 surcharge on,
our customers in order to relieve the burden of answering the additional phone'' calls PlaCed bywireless
customers on local municipalities." Mr. Lello said this comes as close as it can to a
greeingto: the condi ion,
that the Village has requested. Mr. Lello asked that the Village grant their request for a Conditional Use.
Mr. Cassidy asked staff s opinion of item 9. Daniel Ungerleider,, Planning Coordmmator,, stated that staff believes
the condition is consistent with statements made in AT&T)s application. A,r ene Juracek said she'thought
it appropriate to substitute ' AT&T's statement for staffs condition 9. Ms. Juracek said" slie tholught-that, as
th,e itcond"'donstands, AT&T "wouldbe'barried from further lobbying Agat'nst any Will. Mg,. ju, race k fgels,the
Intent expteas ed, bythe petitioner would 'be niore 4p
Mr. Cassidy said he agreed. , Pro,pnatethan the wording of the present condition 9.
I
Mr. Ungerleider recommended that AT&T's statement be included as an exhibit as art of this Conditional
Use, as opposed to condition 9. p 1
Chairman Skowron asked if the motion could be presented with the eiglit cbnditions'' acre ptable.
to, the
petitioner and the ninth condition stricken and replaced by, the,gatement*
In'thefonn, of aletter from, AT&T
before going before the Village Board. Mr. Lello,#ffi
a greed He statM, dim would be'no problemmwi
0 1
acceptance of the previous eight conditions, with the exceptionof conditilon 2 which, requests, landscaping,
outside of their landlord's property.
Daniel Upgerleider, said, staff understands the petitioner cannot putlan&capjAg on 4acent property without
permission. Staff'Will, work w, ith, the petitioner and tlie Mt.'Pr ectPaark D*s to
sh I trict ensure adequate
screening is, providedfor the, 41acent, p#*,
Chairperson Skowron clarified that AT&T will comply with, the conditions as refdrenced fil, staffs memo
of March 19, 1998 to the Zoning Board of Appeals, and, strikes condition 9. AT&T mill submit a, letter,
indicating their position on the 911 wireless surcharge fee by the timethe case he a�,
Is rdby the'Village Board.,
Mr. Lello stated that was correct. ChairpSko
erson 4 0
wron, askediftheir"were questions, or conunents.,
4 *
Ms. Skowron said the Chair would entertain a motionto Approve Case, No. ZDA-01-98 fbr a Conditional',
Use to increase the maximum height of an existing mom polestrticture ftom 70i I to 120 11,as referenced in,,,
Section 14.1703,20, subject to Condiflons I through 8. listedbelow,,'!��,w and a leftor Wi,
Ica*, AUT's
1�@osition on the 911 wireless surcharge fee being received prior to, the V1114P Board hearing fbr this cast#
Prior to the issuance of a Duildffig permit the petitioner shall submit written documentation agreeing to the
following.- %.f
1. Accommodate at least two additional facilities on the 1201 monopole structure;
2. Submit a landscape plan that provides adequate screening for the adjacent park;
Zoning Board of Appeals
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson
ZBA-01-98
Page 4
3. Remove the tower within six months of cessation of use by all carriers or notifying the FCC of intent to
cea,se operations at, the site-, 01
61 1 color without the use of logos, advertising, or any signage except
4. Ma:jtfttn the, tower "in a uniform, neutral
waming or equipment itiform, at
for I � I I Wn'
,insurance covering the facility in an amount not less than one million
50 Provide proof of pub, 1"'ability
dollars ($ 1,000,00,10:),o
6. Su
bruit ' ten infOrmatiOn documenting that the facility complies with regulations administered by Federal
Aviation Administration I stration and the Federal Communications Commission;
7. Submit written documentation from a State of Illinois licensed professional engineer and the manufacturer
that: a) the structure upon which the facility is located, *is sufficient from, a, strrudural, e�,,,n.gi,,ne,,enng,,standpo'lnt
IdesMan ' ed
to bear the,,antiq*paW'1oad,,b 41 c4flapse thAtt'h,,e faciflity',is, igmedand, ufactur,''
MO the event of a f I or
to fall within the boundary lines of the lot on whilch,, it islona ted c), that, it, sh,all, be erected in. ac,cordance
with manufacturer's specifications;
d,
S. Upon, any complaint ofinterference, to, Village, publile safety, communication systems', residential or,
si nals, AT&T and
commemial application including'but not limited to,, to'lev'ision andradio'broadcast 9'
0
ors, shal"l, promp investigate the alleged interference to detennine,if it, is being causod
all, otheutower opeMt tly
by its facility and if so, remedy the complaint.
A motion was made by Ronald Cassidy and seconded by Jack Verhasselt.
&ft's
Upon Roll Call: AYES. bKowron, Cassidy, Juracek, and
I Verhasselt
NAYS: None
The motion was approved 4-0.
Ronald Cassidy made motion to adjourn, seconded by Jack Verhasselt. Meeting was adjourned at 8:55
X.\USERS\coMDEV\I?LNG\ZBA1ZBAI-98 -MIN
0
...... ........ ............... . 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 �
TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MICHAELE SKOWRON9 CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY9 PLANNER (�
MARCH 19, 1998
ARING DATE: MARCH 26, 1998
SUBJECT: ZBA-1-98/1768 W. GOLF ROAD (BEE IND MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMONS PLAZAKONDITIONAL USE TO RAISE OF
ANENIS MONOPOLE ANTENNA STRUCTURE FROM 70' TO 1201
Petitioner: AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
Richard Riley & Associates
7600 S. County Line Road
Buff Ridge, IL 60521
Status of Petitioner: Attorney for AT&T
Property Owner: Robert A. Carrane
Premier Capital Corp., agent for owner. UTC Company, L.L.C.
605 E. Algonquin Road,4300
Arlin gtion 'Height'S, IL 60005
Parcel Numbers: 08-15-201-013
Site Size: 800 sq. feet (Personal Wireless Service Facility includes monopole and utility
building)
Existing Zoning: B-3 Community Shopping
Existing Land Use: Retail shopping center and cell tower
Requested Action: Conditional Use to increase the maximum height of an existing monopole structure
from 70 to 120' (Section 14.1703.20).
Zoning Board of Appeals
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson
The petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use to increase the height of an existing monopole antenna structure
from 70' to 120' and to replace the existing equipment cabinets and cabinet pad (the concrete slab the
cabinets are placed upon) with a new 1 O'x2O'x 10' shelter on a new concrete foundation. AT&T proposes to
co -locate two of its own wireless facilities on this mount. It is staff s understanding that Sprint intends to
co -locate upon this structure. Staff has not received documentation confirming Sprint's interest with this
property.
The facility in question is located behind the Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center, in the northwest
section of the lot. The shopping center is located at the northwest comer of Golf and Busse Roads.
Clearwater Park is located to the north and the west of the site. The park contains a walking path, a picnic
area, playground equipment, and tennis courts. The walking path encompasses the perimeter of the park.
The current Zoning Ordinance requires the petitioner to obtain a Conditional Use for this ground mounted
antenna tower since it exceeds 70' in height. Requests for Conditional Uses must meet specific criteria as
set forth in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Zoning Ordinance. The petitioner details how each standard is met in
Section E of the application booklet.
Petitioner's Justification
The petitioner states that this taller tower will "prevent construction of an additional tower in the area, " and
that this "enhancement' 'will have a "Positive influence on the development of this area."
This request is being evaluated per current code requirements. However, it is logical that this Personal
Wireless Service Facility Conditional Use request be consistent with the requirements for future Personal
Wireless Service Facilities. That ordinance is the result of research that identified the best possible
conditions under which towers could be sited. To that end, staff recommends that prior to the issuance of
a building permit, the petitioner submit written documentation agreeing to the conditions listed under the
recommendation section of this report.
Surroindwnt!
North: CR Conservation Recreation (Clearwater Park)
South: B-3 Community Shopping (Prospect Commons Shopping Center)
East: B-3 Community Shopping (Prospect Commons Shopping Center)
West: CR Conservation Recreation (Clearwater Park)
The subject property is designated for community -commercial use. The proposed use is consistent with this
designation.
RI.E.C.0'm M—Dw
The petitioner's application sufficiently addresses the standards for a Conditional Use. Therefore, staff
recommends anioromal of a Conditional Use to raise the height of an existing monopole antenna structure
from 70' to 120' for Case No. ZBA-1-98, 1768 Golf Road subject to the following conditions:
Zoning Board of Appeals
Michaele Skowron,, Chairperson
ZBA- 1-98
Page 3
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the petitioner shall submit written documentati' 0
following: on agreeing to the
I Accommodate at least two (2) additional facilities on the 120'mono pole structure;
2. Submit a landscape plan that provides, adequate screening for the adjacent •park;
3. Remove the tower within six (6) mon'ths of cessation of use by all carriers or notifying the FCC of
intent to cease operations at the site,
4. Maintain the tower in a uniform, neutral color without the use of logos, advertising, or any signage
except for, warning or equipment in,fonnation;
S. Provide proof of public liability insurance covering the facility in an amount not less than one
million dollars ($1,000,000);
6. Submit written, inf6rimation documenting that the facility complies with regulations administered
by Federal Aviation Administration and the FCQ
7. Submit written documentation from a State of,2111tinot's licensed profess"ional engineerand, the,
Manufacturer that', a the structure uponwhi h the fac*l.*'
)# Ic 1, ity is located is suffic"ent,from a structural
engineering standpoint to bear the anficiplated load, b) inthe event of a &II, or C01,11apse, that the
fact ity 'I's designed and manufactured to, fall, wiithin the, bou,ndar fi I of the lot "on whi"chl'"It', is
ly in
located c) that it shall be erected in accordance with, manufact urer's s•pecifications IN,
NIALA&I
8. 'Cill"'el *'L,OI !
%4A%O
'Lit PUT
ANUM&I lei a III
UF A 44 k %W41m,110 L114 QQ& 4*440, AANN Aft A% 11""Al
item""
ALA All MAMLft
UK.. if
Wi 1111e� lit
TUIJUJIS,
ttet,,iitAAA-A 16illeol L
Of
*p - Y 4 ww� V
4 k",
j,7
A
W, N
J
NOW
D. ..... . -
�A el
Sw
-9
1§
'5
Off, 4 1,
�� 11"(We a
9. The tenant, or any future operator of the antenna site on the owner's, roperty
engage in affecting or influencinglegislation either directly 4 P shall not active1y
y or trid,irectil 'through, any industry
Y I
organization or similar organization in which the tenant participates eliflier fman61 om
11 ly or through *in
kind support which seeks exemption from any emergency or 911, surcharge, fees, for lemergency
dispatch services.
16
concur,
William J. t, 00 Arrr4,V.S We, le
ney, AJCP, Director of Community Development
I
'i- 0 it JO: A
,qft
I
I
9
P-1
O
V)
LA.
0
w
le
z
w
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department - Planning Division
TO:
PROM:
DATE:
SURIECT:
1 0 i i 11111q�IIIIII
r-111 DI a i
ATLIT011113
DANIEL UNGERLEIDER, AICP PLANNING COORDINATOR
APRIL 1, 1998
ZBA-25-979 TEXT AAMNDMIENT TO SECTIONS 14.305.A, 14-305.B.4.a, 14.305.C.51'
140'1503.9.9 14.1603.6, 14.1703.202 14.1803.142 14.1904.20.4 14.2003-7.9 14.2103.269
14.702.A2 14.802.A3, 14-902.Aq 14.1002.A2 14.1102.A3, 14.1202.A, 14.1302 14.1404
14.14042
14.1502, 14.1602,9 14,17022 14.1802, 14.1903.Ag 14.20023, 14.2102.9 14.313 to create
regulations regarding the Personal Wireless Service Facilities Ordinance for the Village.
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits their recommendation to approve a text amendment that modifies
the Zoning Ordinance and creates a new section to the Zoning Ordinance that establishes regulations for
Personal Wireless Service Facilities.
V
rr
IINJ I i
?111199141 p
W-101
The, Zoning Boardof Ap
peaIs discussed the text amendment and voted, 4-0tw, recommend approval of the
10i -or,Personal
text: amendment that modifies the Zoning Ordinance and creates regulations and definitions f
Wkeless Service Fadli"Iti",es.
I concur:
. ......... .
William J. Cooney, �P
Director of Community Pevelopmenj
F:\USERSVOMDEV\PLNG\ZBA\ZBA198MJ.doc
M[V4UTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
IBA CASE NO* ZBA-25-.97
PE Ro
0
SVMCT PROPERTY,
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEAMERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Hearing Date: March 26, 1998
Village of Mount Prospect
N/A
March 9, 1998
Text Amendment -Wireless TW,,ecom, munication Towers
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson
Ronald Cassidy
Arlene Juracek
Jack Verhasselt
Leo Floros
Elizabeth Luxem,
Marshall Ponzi
Wo JOY Coftnoljy� Plafinet� repbrt�d, on Case No. ZBA-2597, a co, at*
Zbfting MW ofAppeals m, I eetm*g, 'On ftbw the Fehnmq 26,1998
I #, M§t. Cmolly said the BbW had, several, qyestions, at that meam"g. She
reVonded to "eWonS regarding:
* Board of AppealsZon1ng
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson
ZBA-25-97
Page 2
4. Licensing Requirements. Ms. Connolly reported that certain documents must be given to the FAA and
FCC prior to obtaining a permit. She said the Village of Mount Prospect would require " copies of these
documents and that other licensing requirement 'issues are addressed at the Village Manager level.
Ms. Connolly stated that, based on comments and finther research, staff has revised the text amendment since
the last meeting as follows:
1. Clarified qualifications, such as "qualified professional engineer who is licensed by the State of Illinois";
2. Increased the maximum height in the Industrial and Office Research Zoning Districts from 701 to 851 to
encourage carriers to locate facilities in these districts;
3. Reorganized Section F, Co -location: moved the Village agreement to permit co -location to the Placement
section.
4. Clarified design criteria to distinguish between antennas on monopoles and all other antennas. Monopoles
must be painted a uniform, neutral color and cannot display company logos;
5. Increased the time frame in which equipment must be removed from three months to six months.
F. Increased the size of tile utility buildings to 600 sq. ft., the same as a detached garage. Ms. Connolly said
the amendment requires co -location and provision must be made to adequately accommodate additional
carriers' equipment on site.
7. Staff created a new section., taking information from "Application and Submittal Requirements" and put
it under a new section titled "Certificate of Completion", similar to a Certificate of Occupancy.
Ms. Connolly stated staffs recommendation for approval and asked ifthere were other questions or comments.
Ms. Connolly responded to questions from the Board regarding antenna height and liability insurance.
Chairperson Skowron asked if there were questions from the audience. Mr. Anthony Lello, Attorney for AT&T
Wireless Services, said that he had not had time to review the latest revision. If AT&T has comments they
will send them before the Village Board convenes,
Chairperson Skowron stated the Chair would accept a motion to approve the text amendment to sections
14.305.a, and the other sections referenced in the March 19, 1998 memo to' the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Motion was made by Ron Cassidy and seconded by Arlene Juracek. 0
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Skowron, Cassidy, Juracek, and Verhasselt
NAYS: None
Ms. Skowron stated that, by a vote of 4-0, the text amendment has the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and will go before the Village Board for inclusion on their agenda on April 7.
Ronald Cassidy made motion to adjourn, seconded by Jack Verhasselt. Meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
Barbara Swiatek I
Planning Secretary
. .. . .. . ......... . .
Daniel UngerleideuPlanning Coordinator
BG -Am"
-103
Section 14.313 Regulations for Personal Wireless Telecommunication Facilities
A. Purpose.
The purpose of his chapter is to provide speciffific, regulations for the placement, construction and
modification of personal wireless telecommunication facilifieS., The provisions, oft!,ie chapter are, not
intended and shall not be interpreted to prohibit or have the effect of prohibitin thepmv*sions, of persotial
g
nre,
wireless services, nor shall the provisions of this article be apphed n such a mannet as, to, ��u. asonably
di,scriminate among the various comp les that provide personalwl"reless services., To the extentthat an
4 # D 6, y
P or p isions, of this chapter, are inconsiste nt or M", conflict With any otlier prov"
ision, s of this title
the provisions of this chapter shall control.
B. Village Action.
C. Petition for Amendment.
l# #11
Should the applIcation of this, chapterliave the effiect, of proln'bifi ent iding
ng a person or ity fiom, pro,v
personal wireless, service to all or a portion of Village,, such provi*der may, petition" the Village Board for
an arn-endmenttothis chapter,, Ile Village Board,uplon receipt'of such a petition, shall promptly undertake
ion to deny such
review of the petition, taking Into, account, the nature and scot e of the petit'lon. Any aecis
P
a petition shall be in writing and supported by substantial, evidence co'nta,,ined, in, awriften record.
D. Application and Submittal Requirements.
No personal wireless semice facililyh shall, be erected, installed or, maintained tn the Village ofMount
4,
Prospect unless a perinit has 'been,, applied fbr and approved by, the Di
Development". trector of Community,
2. All applications for a personal wireless service facility shall include the following documentation
or information:
a. A written report ftom, a
fb
setting forth the Ilowm"g.
Case No. ZBA-25-97, Exhibit I
page 2
=c
WNW T1-11.W.1Wi.7T1-"� mnwr. W -I'M *O'N' IL jr
(7) a map drawn to scale showing the lot lines, land uses and tree coverage, including average
tree height of all properties within three hundred, feet (300') of the proposed site;
(8) that the structure upon which the facility is located
is sufficient from a structural engmeeri , ng standpoint to bear the anticipated load. In
instances of free-standing structures, this shall include a certificate that the foundation of
the structure is built, constructed and engineered to take into account the existing soil
conditions;
(9) certification that in the event of a fall or collapse, that the facility is designed and
manufactured to fall entirely within the boundary lines of the lot on which it is located and
that it has been erected in accordance with manufacturer's specifications;
(10) certification shall also state that the design complies with all local, state and federal
regulations including, but not limited to,, storm water regulations; and
(11) such other documentation as the Village may require.
b. The application shall include "before and after" photos. The "before" photo should be a color
photo of what can currently be seen from any public road within three hundred feet (300') and
the "after" should have the facility superimposed on copies of these photos.
c. The applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed personal wireless service facility will not
interfere with any existing Village public safety communication systems or residential or
commercial application including, but not limited to, television and radio broadcast signals.
d. The Director of Community Development may require review by a third party of the technical
data submitted by the applicant. The applicant is responsible for the cost of such review and the
applicant shall make full payment to the Village of Mount Prospect. The Village shall place
these funds in an escrow account and make payment to the third party upon the completion of
the technical review. Selection of the third party expert is at the discretion of the Director of
Community Development.
E. Placement of Personal Wireless Service Facility,
A personal wireless service facility may be erected or installed only in accordance with this chapter. The
personal wireless service facility shall conform to all minimum setback, yard and height requirements and
to all applicable Federal laws and regulations concerning its use and operation. An easement or a lease is
required for any new facility on property not owned by the applicant. The following chart shall govern the
placement of all personal wireless service facilities: I
Case No. ZBA-25-97, Exhibit I
page 3
F. Co -Location of Personal Wireless Service Facilities
a. The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of the existing or approved tower
or structure, as certified by a qualified professional
UM and the existing or approved tower cannot replaced to
accommodate the additional facility at a reasonable cost;
Antenna Standards
go MOM MM M M
Setb a cks
Zoning
Mono-
Lattice Guyed
I
Structure
Adjacent to residential
Not Adjacent to residential
District
pole
Mount **
. . . . ............. . . . .
Height
Front
Side
Rear
Front
Interior
Exterior
Rear
ll�, OR
r
Mal
NP
100% HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
NP
is,
30'
20
B-3
711
70 '
M
Nr
1*T
101
NP
100% HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
NP
of
.
20I
B-5
NPP
NP
NP
101
NP
100% HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
NP
100% HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
B -5C
NP
NP
MM!M11MM
NP
10,
NP
10091 HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
10096 HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
CR
70'
NP
NP
101
NP
1009E HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
NP
100%
MIN
100%
100% HEIGHT
Creater than
HEIGHT
HEIGHT
6 acm
Bl� B2
701
NP
NP
10,
NP
100% HEIGHT
100% HEIGHT
NP
...........
10
301
20
M Rio101*
NP
NP
NP
RA4 R2
R3o R40 R5
. .... . ..............
NO* . ...........
No more than one
per residential unit permitted
* Height above the existing structure
NP = Not Permitted
F. Co -Location of Personal Wireless Service Facilities
a. The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of the existing or approved tower
or structure, as certified by a qualified professional
UM and the existing or approved tower cannot replaced to
accommodate the additional facility at a reasonable cost;
Case No. ZBA-25-97, Exhibit I
page 4
b. The planned equipment would cause interference materially affecting the usability of other
existing or planned equipment at the tower or structures as documented by a qualified and
licensed professional engineer and the interference cannot be prevented at a reasonable cost;
c. Existing or approved towers and structures within the search radius cannot accommodate the
planned equipment at a height necessary to function reasonably as certified by a qualified and
licensed professional engineer;
d. Other unforeseen reasons that make it unfeasible to locate the planned telecommunications
equipment upon an existing or approved tower or structure as certified by an appropriate
professional.
2.SfXm!gjmm, . ......... . Desipm, Any proposed personal wireless telecommunication service facility shall be
designed structurally, electrically and, in all respects, to accommodate both the applicant's antennas
and comparable antennas for at least two additional users. Towers must be designed to allow for
future rearrangement of antennas upon the tower and to accept antennas mounted at varying heights.
G. Design Criteria.
H. Screening.
A combination of landscaping, berming, fences or other screening materials shall be utilized to maintain or
enhance.,the existing character of the property surrounding a personal wireless service facility. All structure
bases shall be completely screened from view.
I. Abandoned or Unused Facilities.
Abandoned or unused facilities, towers, or portions of towers shall be removed as follows:
1. All shall be removed within vufte (3) months of cessation of use or of notifying the FCC of
intent to cease operations at the site, whichever comes first, unless a time extension is approved by
the Director of Community Development. A copy of the relevant portions of a signed lease which
requires the applicant to remove the tower and associated facilities upon cessation of operations at
the site shall be submitted at the time of application. Any tower and associated facilities not
removed withint'"rele "IN I WID . months of the cessation of operations at a site shall be deemed a
nuisance and may be abated according to the nuisance provisions of the Village Code.
I
Case No. ZBA-25-97, Exhibit I
page 5
2. Unused portions of towers above a manufactured connection shall be removed within two (2)
months of the time of the abandonment of that portion unless the Village has specifically designated
that portion for future co -location.
J. Utility Buildings and Structures.
All utility structures and structures accessory to a personal wireless service facility tower shall be
architecturally designed to blend in with the surrounding environment and shall meet the minimum set back
requirements of the underlying zoning district. Ground mounted equipment shall be screened from view by
suitable vegetation. The maximum height for an accessory utility structure is twelve feet (12') and shall be
no larger than uP
square feet.
K. Signs and Advertising.
The use of any portion of a tower for signs other than warning or equipment information is prohibited.
L. Temporary Facilities.
Temporary personal wireless service facilities shall conform to all of the setback and yard requirements of
the district in which they are located. A temporary personal wireless service facility shall not exceed the
height of the facility previously approved for the property, or one hundred feet (100') in the case of a special
event. Only one temporary personal wireless service facility will be allowed per site at any one time, unless
the approved facility on the subject site allows for co -location, in which case the permissible number of
temporary facilities on that site shall be the number approved for that facility. A temporary personal wireless
service facility must be located behind the front plane of any principal structure that is on the lot. A
temporary personal wireless service facility may be allowed only in accordance with Section 14.313.E
A request for a temporary personal wireless service facility may be granted only by the Village Manager in
such reasonable numbers and with such reasonable conditions as the Manager may deem appropriate. Any
request for additional time beyond that set forth in these paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be subject to review
by the Zoning Board of Appeals and approval of the Village Board. 0
1.S'P.'W'4113m Temporary personal wireless service facilities shall be permitted for each licensed
carrier for special events (temporary sporting or entertainment events) of a period of one week. No
more than three (3) such promotions shall be allowed 'MEW, � in a calendar year.
2. Rena•I gq,d E If a permanent personal wireless service facility is under repair rA, M1, linz,
or equipment is being upgraded, a temporary facility shall be permitted for each licensed provider
for a period of up to ninety (90) days. The owner of the facility must certify in writing the necessity
for the repair or equipment upgrade.
M. Insurance.
The provider must tender to the Director of Community Development on an annual basis, proof of public
liability insurance covering the facility in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00).
Case No. ZBA-25-97, Exhibit I
page 6
N. Compliance,
All personal wireless service facilities must maintain compliance with the approved plans and specifications.
If the personal wireless service facility becomes non-compliant with approved plans and specifications due
to, but not limited to: discoloration, cracking, missing components, rusting, settling, damage or general
disrepair; then the owners of the personal wireless service facility and the owner of the structure or lot on
which the personal wireless service facility is located will be jointly and severally responsible for remedying
the -specific non -conformities, - These non -conformities, must be -remedied within forty-five (45) days after
written notice, detailing these non -conformities, is sent by the Village to the owner of the personal wireless
service facility and the owner of the structure or lot. Failure to remedy all of the cited non -conformities,
within the 45 day time period, shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding $500 each day that the violation
continues.
H
"r
O� �R �r r" N
R ff
f NAI.
ill
P. Definitions .
Antenna is the surface from which wireless radio signals are sent and received by a personal wireless
service facility. "Antenna" should not be used as a synonym for "cell site."
Applicant is a person or company with an application before the Village for a permit for a personal
wireless service facility. 0
Co -location is the use of a single mount on the ground by more than one carrier (vertical co -location)
and/or several mounts on an existing building by more than one carrier.
Facility see Personal Wireless Service Facility definition.
Guyed Tower is a monopole or lattice tower that is tied to the ground or other surface by diagonal
cables.
Lattice Tower is a ground mounted structure that is self-supporting with multiple legs and cross -bracing
of structural steel.
Monopole is a type of ground mounted structure that is self-supporting with a single shaft of wood, steel
or concrete and a platform (or racks) for panel antennas arrayed at the top. Vertical co -locations often
have arrays at intermediate positions on the monopole. I
Personal Wireless Services are commercial mobile radio services, unlicensed wireless services., and
common carrier wireless exchange access services.
Case No. ZBA-2597, Exhibit I
page 7
Personal Wireless Service Facility is the plant, equipment and property, including but not limited to:
cables, wires, conduits, ducts, pedestals, antennae, electronics and other appurtenances used or to be used
to transmit, receive, distribute, provide or offer telecommunications services, as further defined in the
Telecommunications Act. A personal wireless service facility is the appropriate term for "cell site" in
ordinances and other official documents.
Structure Mounted Antenna is typically located on structures such as street lights, traffic lights, water
towers, utility poles and sides and roofs of buildings.
Unlicensed Wireless Services are commercial mobile services that can operate on public domain
frequencies and, therefore, need no Federal Communications Commission (FCC) license for each cell
site, such as an amateur radio facility,
Whip Antenna is a thin rod that beams and receives a signal in all directions.
X.-\USr-4RS'\COMDE'R CELLXZBA25B-9.WPD
0
TO* MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MICHAELE SKOWRON, �Eg,SON
FROM: JUDY CONIYOLLY, PLANNER
DATE* MARCH 199 1998
SUIM'' ZBA-25ft979 TFJXT AMMM[ENT TO SECTIONS 14.305.&
14-305,3A.a. l4*305.C65'v 14,1503.9p 14 ,1603.6, 14*1703.2% 14*1803,014,
14.1904*20, 14-20033t 14-2103.261 14.701A, 14.802,0&,
14.1002.A,4 14.1102.Ast 14,1202A 14.1-302,114.1404 14.155020,14ola In,
14.17029 14.1802$ 14,1903*A$ 14.2002 , I X
0 0 14*2102'. and,,, create smflon 1,4313
to establish =,gu, lations, regarding the Personal W 'less, Service Facilities
Ordm"ance fdr the Vfflage.
admund Infa BIM",
Pe
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Requested
Arc dons
L Amend Section 14.305.A by addingparagraph 2 •to read:
Satellite Dishes under one meter in diameter, and Personal •Wireless Serivice
Facilities. Satellite that are less one meter (39,37") in diameta
and Personal Wireless Service Fac are not regulated by Section
14.305."'
2. Amend Section 14.305 -B.4 -a to read:
"a. Residential Zoning Ducts. Roof -mounted dish ft located on
residential buildings shall not exceed one meter in diameter. Roof -mounted
dish antennas located on educational, religious, or Municipal buildings slsall
not exceed ten feet (101) in diameter."
Zoning Board of Appeals
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson
I Amend Section 14.305-0-5 to read:
ZBA-25-97
Page 2
465" Screening. All roof -mounted dish antennas larger than, one tneter di,,am
I I eta
must be fully screened from View from,, a4lacent roadways, and properties,
(between grade level and 10' above grade level) with matetials, WWch, are
compatible with the building to whi they am aocessoty�"
4. 17he following Sections shall be amended by deleting the following sectionso
a
Delete as Conditional Uses,
Sec. 14.1503.9« (Antenna towers, ground-Mountd, exceeding seventy, feet C?CO
in height)
14. i 603.6 tit
14,1703-20 CIL
14.1803.14
14.1904-20 CIL
14.2003.7 CIL
14.2103.26 46
5. Create Section 14.313, a new section to the zoning Ordinance that es
regulations regarding Personal Wireless Ser "ce Facilities. . tabilish, es
0 so
6. The following Sections shall be amended by
maaaiz: "Wireless Service Facilities,
& RW
be penmtted as set forth in Section 14.313,E."
Sec. 14.702.A2 14.802.At.9 14.902A, 14.1002A 14.1102A 14.1202A 14,1302v
14.1404t 14.15022 14.160210 14.17029 14.18029 14o 1903.As.9 14.2002P 14*2102
41-N
1!1111111i q
11111 14 k (W*1 0
A
1, #x I , ,
41 Ill's 0211,04I!L Ilk 0
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-25-97
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson Page 3
,provides in, part, for....municipati'ties to retain n the authori over the plauctio,14 and
modification of personal', ,rel ss service facilitiest Muru"cipalities cannot discriinii wtoamong
e,of carriers, or, promba or have the effect ofprIohi tIng, thle provision, of personal wireless
serVICICS,
1. Amend Section 14.305.A by adding paragraph 2 to read:
"21 Satellite Dishes under one meter in diameterand Personal W"ireless Service ,Facifiu,"e&
Satellite dishes that are less than one meter(
39-37") in diameter and Personal
Wireless Service Facilities are not regulated by this Section 14.305."
2. Amend Section 14.305.B.4.a to read:
"a, Residential Zoning Districts. Roof -mounted dish antennas I on resi&ntkil,
buildings shall not exceed one meter in diameter. RooPmounted, anten
located on educational, religious, or Municipal buildings shall not exceed ten feet
(10) M* diameter."
3. Amend Section 14.305.C.5 to read:
465, Screening. All roof -mounted dish antennas larger than one meter in diameter must
I A
be fiffly screened from view from adjacent roadways and pL%JIJCL I Res (between grade
level and 10' above grade level) with materials which are compatible with the
building to which they are accessory."
4. The following Sections shall be amended by deleting the following sections:
Delete as Conditional Uses:
Sec., 14.1503.9 (Antenna towers, ground -mounted, exceeding seventy feet (70) in height)
14.1 603.+
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-25-97
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson Page 4
14,1703.42 0 66
14,1803-14 61L
14* 1904.10 fit
14,2003.7 66
14,2103.26 CIL
W,
5. no fbllo� Sectio*ns shall, be amended by adding: "Wireless SeMce Facilities WMU be
permitted as set fbrth, w Section 14.2605'
Sec. 14-702A 14-802A*14.,902A 14-1002A 14*1102A* 1*1202A0 14o.1302t 14014Nv
14,15OZ 14,164- M170230 14,1802, 14.1903,Ag*2002v 1*2102
f-0 Create section 14.313, a new section to the uIng Ordina=
regarding Personal Muvless Service Facilifles. %w eftb
sir
Now
William Cooney, AICP,, Co velopment Director
A
VILLAGE OFMOUNT PROSPECT
Community Development Department - Planning Division
M E M 0 R AN D U M
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MICHAELE SKOWRON9 CHAIRPERSON
FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY9 PLANNER
0
DATE. FEBRUARY 19, 1998
HEARIING DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1998
SUBJECT: ZBA-25-979 TEXT AMENDMENT TO SECTIONS 14.305.A.,
14.305-B.4.a,, 14.305.C.5,14.1503,9 14o1603-6114 1703420, 14-1801,14)
14.1904.20, 14-2003-7, 14,2101261 14.701A, 14.801A, 14AIAO
14.1001A, 14.1102.Al 14,1201A, 14.1302, 14A,4041 14.1502,10 14,016020
14.1702, 14.1802,9 14.1903 A, 1,4.2002) 1 4.21,02t 14.3 13 to crea regulations
regarding the Personal Wireless ServiceFacilities Ordinance for the Village,,,,
Petitioner: Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Requested Actions:
1. Amend Section 14.305-A by adding paragraph 2 to read: is
Satellite Dishes under One Meter in diameter and Personal Wireless Service
Facilities. Satellite dishes that are less than one meter(39.37") in diameter
and Personal Wireless Service Facilities are not regulated by this Section
14.305."
2. Amend Section 14.305-B.4.a to read:
66a. Residential Zoning Districts. Roof -mounted dish antennas located on
residential buildings shall not exceed one meter in diameter. Roof -mounted dish
antennas locatedon educational, religious, or Municipal buildings shall not exceed
0,
ten f6et (1 0) in diameter!"
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-25-97
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson Page 2
I Amend Section 14.305.C.5 to read:
"5. Screening. All roof -mounted dish antennas larger than one meter in diameter
must be fully screened from view from adjacent roadways and properties (between
grade level and 10' above grade level) with materials which are compatible with the
building to which they are accessory."
40 The following Sections shall be amended by deleting the following sections:
Delete as Conditional Uses:
See. 14.1503.9 (Antenna towers, ground -mounted, exceeding seventy feet (701)
in height)
14.1603.6
14.1703.20
14.1803.14
14.1904.20
14.2003.7
14.2103.26
5# The following Sections shall be amended by adding: "Wireless Service Facilities
shall be permitted as set forth in Section 14.313.E."
Sec. 14.702.A, 14.802.A, 14.902.A, 14.1002.A, 14.1102.A, 14.1202.A.9 14.1302.1
14.1404, 14.1502, 14.1602, 14.1702,9 14.18029,14.1901A, 14.20029 14.2102
The Village has received many applications for the construction and modification of personal
wireless service facilities. Based on general market trends for new technology and the high volume
0 0
of inquiries, it appears this will continue. More finportantly, the *increase is supported by the passage
of the 1996 Telecommunications Act.
The 1996 Telecommunications Act allows for significant changes in the field of
telecommunications. The Act provides for the entry of more carriers, and the opportunity for them
to make major changes in the telecommunications field, such as providing uninterrupted
communication in remote places. Overall, the industry is making progress to improve the quantity
and quality of service. To achieve this, carriers are using new and, in some views, radically different
technology, such as mounting antennas that are not visible to the casual observer to the side of a
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-25-97
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson Page 3
building. As stipulated in the Telecommunications Act, local governments cannot prohibit carriers
from entering, the market, nor construct entry barriers (ban the construction of new facilities). The
Act does allow local governments to enforce local zoning authority over the -4 "placement,
1)
construction, and modification of personal wireless service,facilities',
Currently, Section 14.305 of the Zoning Ordinance regulates radio, satellite and television antennas,
towers and dishes, and, by default, personal wireless service facilities. The current regulations do
not adequately provide guidelines that protect the safety and welfare of residents while balanc a 9
the needs of the business community and the carriers. Therefore, staff is submitting
rec,nendations to amend the de ons and regulations of the Zoning Ordi
recon nance to include the
regulation of personal wireless service facilities. The attached text amendment, Exhibit 1, addresses
the following issues:
Establishing setbacks designed for a personal wireless service facility helps determine the best
location fo r- a facility acid maintains the character of the community. The proposed setbacks,
permitted heights, and permitted types of facilities for each zoning district recognizes thee
,and uniqueness of these facilities by using the best s g tools available to a municipality. A public
hearing will be required for applications that exceed provisions specified in Sec. 14.3 13.E.
The negative impacts of a facility are eliminated or mini zed by requiring a design that does not
attract attention. For example, prohibiting signs and advertising on the facility reinforces this
concept. Screening the facility and having appropriate construction requirements produces a higher
quality product that lessens negative impacts. These specifications are outlined in Sec. 14.313.K,
%W
Signs and Advertising, Sec. 14-313.G, Design Criteria, and Sec. 14.313.H, Screening,
At
#1,144M,
NAM.
0XV0.0.0
(4114
Ei
:encouraging co -location s the most effective way to obtain a viable telecommunication network
without having a concentration of monopoles. The proposed ordinance provides incentives for
carriers to co -locate and also requires documentation that co -location was not possible before
pering new towers. These requirements are outlined in Sec. 14-313Y, Co -Location of Personal mi W
Wireless Service Facilities.
It is essential for the Village to be proactive and require the removal of obsolete technology before
it becomes an issue. Carriers should remove all equipment and restore the site within a specified
Zoning Board of Appeals
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson
ZBA-25-97
Page 4
number of days of not using the site. The exact time frame is outlined in Sec. 14.313.1,9 Abandoned
or Unused Facilities.
L Amend Section 14-305.A by adding paragraph 2 to read:
462, Satellite Dishes under One Meter in diameter and Personal Wireless Service
Facilities. Satellite dishes that are less than one meter(39.37") M* diameter and
Personal Wireless Service Facilities are not regulated by this Section 14.305."
2. Amend Section 14.305.B.4.a to read:
46a. Residential Zoning Districts. Roof -mounted dish antennaslocated on residential
buildings shall not exceed one meter in diameter. Roof -mounted" antennas
located on educational, religious, or Municipal buildings shall not exceed ten feet
(10') in diameter."
Amend Section 14.305.C.5 to read:
"5. Screening. All roof -mounted dish antennas larger than one meter in diameter must be
f
'ro
fully screened,, from, view M adjacent roadways and, properties (between,grade! level and
10" above grade level) with material which are compatible with, the bu , i1ding to which, they!
are accessory.�)
4.
The following Sections shall be amended by deletmg the following sections:
Delete as Conditional Uses:
Sec. 14.1503.9 (Antenna towers, ground -mounted , exceeding seventy feet (70') in
height
14.1603.6 46
14.1703.20
14.1803.14
14.1904.20
Zoning Board of Appeals ZBA-25-97
Michaele Skowron, Chairperson Page 5
14.2003.7 441
14.2103.26 96
5* The following Sections shall be amended by adding: "Wireless Service Facilities shall be
pemaitted as set forth in Section 14,311"
Sec. 14.702A 14.802AI4.902.A, 14,1002A,, 14.1102,A, 1 2ZA, 14.13029 14.1404.2
14,1502.9 14.16029 14.1702.0 14,18029 14. 1903. 14 , 14.2102
I concur:
William.Yj Cooney,
COM auni'lly Development Director
TO: : ICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
a,- ILEA'S
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: APRIL 1, 1998
SUBJECT: WATER AND S RATE INCREASES
I V)
To obtain the Village Board's approval of the attached ordinance implementing water and sewer
rate increases.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past several years, the Village has followed the practice of approving moderate annual
water and sewer rate increases. This has avoided the need for large sporadic increases. In May of
1995 1 1996, and 1997, the Village increased water and sewer rates by 3.0%, 4.2%, and 3.5%,
respectively.
DISCUSSION.
The proposed ordinance would increase water and sewer rates by approximately 4.0%. The 1998
Water and Sewer Fund budget, a component of the 1998 Village Budget, was developed based
upon a 4.0% increase in rates effective May 1, 1998. As you know, the Village Board approved
and adopted the 1998 Village Budget, including the scheduled increase, in December of 1997.
The increase in rates will enable the Village to maintain the water and sewer system infrastructure
and the current level of service.
For the typical resident receiving both Village 'water and sewer services, the combined water and
sewerage rate per 1,000 gallons of water consumed would be $3.44, up from the present rate of
$3.31.
That the Village Board approve the attached ordinance implementing increases in water and sewer
rates effective May 1, 1998.
7S4 "
Iall OR It
Mm
C 00
David Strahl, Assistant Vilage. Manager
Carol L. Widmer, Assistant Director of Finance
xAusm\ca,putob,\waIerW8incr
Oq
Cod/
4/1/98
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V ENTITLED "METERS AND RATES"
OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECT, 10bl!PNE: That paragraphs A and B of Section 22.504.2 entitled "Water Rates" of Article V
entitled "Meters and Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further
amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 22.504.2.A and Section 22.504.2.13 shall
be and read as follows:
Sec. 22.504.2. Water Rates.
A. All Village users within the Village, having a direct or indirect connection with
Village water mains or pipes shall pay the following rate:
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $3.11
B. All Village users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or
indirect connection with Village water mains or pipes shall pay the following rate:
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $6.22 if
SE!9TION1 That paragraph C of Section 22.504.3 entitled "Sewer Rates" of Article V
entitled "Meters and Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further
amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 22.504.3.0 shall be and read as follows,-,,
C. Rate:
1. All Village sewer users within the corporate limits of the Village having a
direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer and water mains or
pipes shall pay the following sewer rate, based upon the amount of water
consumed to which sewer service is furnished:
Per 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $0.33
2. All Village sewer users within the corporate limits of the Village having a
direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer mains or pipes and not
with the Village water mains or pipes shall pay a flat rate of:
Per month per dwelling unit $2.69
3. All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or
indirect connection with the Village sewer and water mains or pipes, shall
pay the following sewer rate based upon the amount of water consumed to
which sewer service is furnished:
Per 1 000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $0.33
4. All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a direct or
indirect connection with the Village sewer mains or pipes, but not with
Village water mains or pipes, shall pay a flat rate of. -
Per month per dwelling unit $2.69 It
SECTION THREE: That the fees set forth in this Ordinance shall be applied to all water and
sewer services used after April 30, 1998.
SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after Its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
uly W,
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 11998.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL JANONIS
VILLAGE CLERK CAROL FIELDS
FROM: VILLAGE ENGINEER
DATE: MARCH 30, 1998
SUBJECT. METER ROAD SUBDIVISION
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
project has been satisfactorily completed and I recommend approval and acceptance of
this project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
tA-1
u1becker
JAW
x.-\riWs\etVineefkkw%Mwc,WWrrdbd.mm
VILILAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC I1%1PROVEM[ENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE EMPROVEMEENT APPROVAL
PROJECT.
LOCATION:
DATE:
STAFF APPROVAL
m
Meier Road Subdivision
-Meier Road and Connie Lane
March 101, 1998,
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL:
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PUB.WKS.DIR.
COMM.DEV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
PUBLIC P"ROVEMEI' T'S FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN
1 X80 L.F. - 811)
SANITARY SEWER
675 L.F. - 871
STORM SEWER
45 L.F. -12"
ROADWAYS
C PIS
SIDEWALKS
S.I.
STREET REGULATORY
SIGNS N/A
STREET LIGHTS
# 3
PARKWAY TREES
# 24
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING Co ete
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS N/A
PRIVATE U*IPROVIEMIENTS APPROVED
WATER MAIN
NLA
SANITARY,SEWER
N/A
STORM EWER
435 L.F. - 12 '
ROADWAY
N/A
PARKING LOTS
N/A
LANDSCAPING
N/A
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS N/A
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, S DAY OF 219
Village Clerk
/caf
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY FOR THE DISTRICT NO. 1 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
IN THE VILLAGE OF M L0g,N1 PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a municipality which exercises authority pursuant to
Chapter 65, Art 5, Section 111-74.4-1 et seq. of the Illinois Municipal Code as set forth in the
Illinois Compiled Statutes, known as the "Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act"; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect did on August 20, 1985 adopt Ordinance No. 3554
entitled "An Ordinance Approving the Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment
Project for District No. 1 Redevelopment Project Area in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois";
and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect did on August 20, 1985 adopt Ordinance No. 3555
entitled "an Ordinance Designating District No. 1 Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area in
the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois," designating District No. I as a redevelopment project
pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect did on August 20, 1985 adopt Ordinance No. 3556
entitled "An Ordinance Adopting Tax I ' ncrement Financing for the District No. I Tax Increment
Redevelopment Project Area in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois"; and
WHEREAS, the Village President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have
determined that the acquisition of the real property described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
made a part of this Ordinance, is necessary and appropriate for the implementation of the Tax
Increment Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project for District No. I Redevelopment
Project Area heretofore approved; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 65, Act 5, Section 11-74.4-4 (c) of the Illinois
Municipal Code as set forth in the Illinois Compiled Statutes the Village of Mount Prospect is
authorized to acquire property, real or personal, within the District No. I Redevelopment Project
Area by purchase, donation, lease or eminent domain for the purposes of implementing said
redevelopment project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That it is hereby determined that the real property described on Exhibit A,
attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance, is necessary and appropriate for the
implementation of the Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project for
District No. 1 Redevelopment Project Area heretofore approved.
SECTION TWO: That it is hereby determined that the real property described on Exhibit A be
utilized, occupied and developed pursuant to the Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and
Redevelopment Project for District No. 1 Redevelopment Project Area, a redevelopment area
pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act.
§ECIION J!fflgf.: That it is hereby determined that it is necessary, proper and desirable that the
Village of Mount Prospect shall acquire title to and possession of the real property described in
Exhibit A for the reason that said real property is necessary, required and needed for the
implementation of the Tax Increment Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project for
District No. 1 Redevelopment Project Area heretofore approved.
SECTION FOUR: That the Village of Mount Prospect, the Village Attorney of the Village of Mount
Prospect, sand Burke and Ryan, Special Attomeys of the Village of Mount Prospect, be and are
hereby authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate for and on behalf of the Village of Mount
Prospect with the owner or owners of the real property described on Exhibit A for the purpose
thereof by the Village of Mount Prospect.
gECT IONLI.: That in the event that the Village Attorney and Special Attorneys are unable to
agree with the owner or owners of said real property as to the compensation to be paid therefor,
then title and possession of said real property legally described on Exhibit A shall be acquired by
the Village of Mount Prospect through condemnation and the Village Attomey and Special
Attomeys are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to institute proceedings in any court of
competent jurisdiction to acquire title to and possession of said real property for the Village of
Mount Prospect in accordance with the eminent domain laws of the State of Illinois and pursuant
to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act.
SECTION SIX: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, by the
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois and approval by the President thereof,
and publication in pamphlet form the day of 1998.
AYES:
NAYS:
, ban -"Om 4 W
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 11998.
...... . .......... . . . -------------- ..............
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
T
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 3 SOUTH WILLE STREET,
MOUNT PROSPECT I It ILLIN019i
Lot 2 in the McLean Resubdivision in Mount Prospect, being a rdsubdivisio*n in the
West Half of Section 12, Township 41 North, RangeEast of the Third Principal
Meridian, In the Village of Mount Prospect, according to the plat thereof registered
in the Office of the Registrar of Tiles of cook County, Illinois on October 20, 1975
2s Document LR 2835833.
PERMANENT TAX INDEX NO. 08-12-102-044
/caf
4/2/98 RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS FOR A REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
'
TARGET AREA F AND I WIT H'TO'WN CENTRE, L.L.,%.oON
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a home rule unit of local government located in
Cook County, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has formerly adopted a Tax Increment Financing
Program to upgrade the quality and image of a portion of the Northwest Highway Corridor
designated Downtown Tax Increment Redevelopment Project "Target Areas A through 1;" and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect mailed Requests For Proposal for the development of
the Downtown Redevelopment District Target Area F and 1; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect received two (2) proposals (one of which was
subsequently withdrawn by the Developer) in response to that Request For Proposal; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined
that the proposal submitted by Town Centre, L.L.C. is the most favorable proposal submitted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
S "ECT10N ONE.: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby
authorize entering into negotiations for a Redevelopment Agreement for the development of
Downtown Redevelopment District Target Area F and I with Town Center, L.L.C., consisting of
Norwood Builders, Inc., A & T Investments, Inc. and Kaiser Development, subject to the terms
and conditions of the referenced Request For Proposal.
CA,
SECTION TWO,,',That if a Redevelopment Agreement is not entered into between the Village of
Mount Prospect and Town Centre, L.L.C., consisting of Norwood Builders, Inc., A & T
Investments, Inc. and Kaiser Development, by the close of business on May 22, 1998, the
proposal submitted by Town Centre, L.L.C. shall be deemed as rejected by the Village.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
FIMAT43
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of,-, ......... . 11998.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT I k
Commiinity Development Department - Planning Division
W
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Ij
41
DANIEL UNGERLEIDEII, AICD, PLANNING COORDINATOR
FEBRUARY 23, 1998
--- - ---------
COMMISSION FEBRUARY 4, 1998
The Rand Road Corridor Report was presented to the Committee of the Whole on May 27, 1997.
At that time, Trustee Corcoran stated concerns that the tone of the report was slanted toward
commercial development and did not adequately address residential areas on Rand Road. It was
decided that Rand Road was a shared corridor and the language should reflect equal importance of
both residential and commercial uses along the road. The general consensus of the Village Board
was to modify the tone of the document so that it reflects the equal importance of residential and
commercial areas. Trustee Corcoran agreed to revise sections of the report and submit his changes
for review to the Plan Commission,
The Plan Commission reviewed the Rand Road Corridor Plan, which included Trustee Corcoran's
changes,, at the February 4,, 1998 Plan Commission meeting. A public hearing was held because
more than 90 days had passed since the document was last presented. The Plan Commission
transmits their recommendations for revisions to the Rand Road Corridor Plan as approved at their
February 4, 1998 meeting. Those revisions are incorporated as part of the minutes of that meeting.
Trustee Corcoran's revisions are shown in the left column and text recommended by the Plan
Commission i's in the right column. The page number refers to the Rand Road Corridor Plan
Revised Per Committee of the Whole November 1997, including Trustee Corcoran's revisions. 'No
Change" denotes that Plan Commission concurred with Trustee Corcoran's revision.
WilliamG. Cooney, AICP, Community Development Director
DU:bhs
XAUSEASkC0MDEV\PLNG\PC\H RANDRDUUNDMEMOMW
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMIMSSION
February 4, 1998
CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Hoffman
at 7:34 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call:
Absent:
Vfflage Staff Present:
APPROVAL OF A01�4`UTES:
Michael Hoffman, Chairman
Edwin Janus
William Reddy (via conference call)
Carol Tortorello,
Louis Velasco
Michael Zadel
Frank Boege
June Richards
Angela Volpe
Daniel Ungerleider, AICP, Planning Coordinator
Judy Connolly, Planner
Michael Sims, Planner
A motion was made by Carol Tortorello and seconded by Louis Velasco to approve the minutes of the
January 21, 1998 meeting of the Plan Commission. Those minutes were approved by a vote of 5-0 with
1 abstention by Michael Zadel.
SUBDIVISIONS: None
l,
COM3WrTEE RFPORT S: Comprehensive Plan Committee
Chairman Hoffman explained that the Commission has been inviting representatives of the various taxing
bodies affecting the Village and learning what plans the different school and park districts have that relate
to our Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Hoffman introduced Dr. Maureen Hager, Superintendent, Mount Prospect
Elementary School District 57.
Ms. Hager explained that the School District boundaries are not contiguous to any other boundaries, i.e.,
Village or Park District. Ms. Hager stated District 57 is the central geographic school district in Mount
Prospect, encompassing half of the Village's population and about 1/3 of its geographic area. Ms. Hager
stated, with the decline in school population over recent years, they currently have three buildings with about
1,800 students: Fairview, Lincoln, Lions Park. They own a fourth building, Westbrook, leased to NSSCO
for special education. Fairview and Lions Park buildings are brand new and in good condition. The other
buildings need approximately $100,000 in repairs. The administrative building requires the most repairs.
Ms. Hager said they have no plans at this time to acquire large pieces of property, although they may look
to acquire smaller pieces to enlarge parking areas at the school. They are concerned about the cost of the
TIF District to District 57 and are anxiously awaiting to hear what the plans will be and how those plans will
impact the School District.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meet" Page 2
NEW BUSINESS: Public Hearing - C.D.B.G. Revised Budget for Fiscal Year 1998
Chairman Hoffman opened the public hearing for the Community Development Block Grant revised budget
for fiscal year 1998 at 7:49 p.m. Mr. Hoffman said we have received notice from HUD as to the actual
amount we will receive from the federal government this year. Mr. Hoffinan asked if notice of the meeting
had been published. Michael Sims, Planner, said yes and presented a copy of the January 16 publication to
the group. Mr. Sims also stated that letters identifying the proposed changes had been sent to all applicants.
Mr. Sims summarized staff's report. He explained that the Village's original C.D.B.G. application was based
on a previously estimated award of $383,000. Last month the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) notified the Community Development Department that the Village's C.D.B.G.
allocation for fiscal year 1998 will be $359,000. As a result, the Village is required to revise its original
application so that it is consistent with the final grant amount. He noted that this problem will most likely
re -occur each year.
Staff is recommending that the Single Family Housing Rehabilitation budget be reduced from $162,545 to
$142,145. Traditionally, the Village has made budget, adjustments from this activity when necessary. Last
year, the Village received $57,000 in repaid loans. Those funds will balance the shortfall in the Single Family
Housing Rehabilitation allocation.
Mr. Sims noted that HUD requires that no more than 15% of the grant can be used for public service
activities. In order to satisfy this requirement staff is recommending that the budgets of two public service
activities be changed: New Horizons and Teaching Ceramics/Arts. Last year, the New Horizons Program
received a C.D.B.G. grant from Mount Prospect of $5,000. The Village increased the grant for 1998 to
$7,000, an 'increase of $2,000. Staff recommends that the New Horizons Program now be funded at $5,400.
If approved, this budget level will represent an 8% increase over the funding provided for New Horizons in
1997.
Staff is also recommending that the funding for Teaching Ceramics/Arts activity by Clayground, Inc. be
eliminated. The budget had originally allocated $2,000 for this service. Staff contacted Crossroads - Illinois
Girls Scouts Council (Boxwood Program) to evaluate the impact of the proposed allocation changes. They
informed staff that they intend to use the Clayground's facility as part of an after school program and during
the Summer Safari Program. In this way, the Clayground, Inc. Program will continue to benefit from the
C.D.B.G. Program without receiving C.D.B.G. funds.
Mr. Sims concluded by stating the proposed reallocation of funds will conform with the revised C.D.B.G.
award and will do so without substantially harming the programs that have successfully provided services
to Village residents. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of the revised C.D.B.G. budget allocation as
illustrated on the attached table dated 1/27/98.
Chairman Hoffman commented that it might be better next year to estimate the budget for less than we
anticipate receiving so it will not be necessary to go back to the various agencies and tell them they will
receive less than they had expected. Mr. Hoffman asked for comments from the group.
Diane Kovack, of Clayground Inc., said she was very disappointed with the loss of the anticipated $2,000.
She said she had been achieving phenomenal results in the short time she had been working with the LD
children and felt that working with clay had helped them greatly in understanding various subjects.
Nancy Cory, of Girl Scouts/11, Crossroads Council, stated that they had been conducting an after school
program where 46 children attended a 2-1/2 hr. session at Clayground. She said the children had been very
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting
positive about, the experi , ence. Ms. Cory said Clayground had done a very well with hyperaefive,
1 learning
It
disabled chi*ldren, and children with sellf-esteem problems. Ms., Cony reported on dleir,vari,o,u,sact,lv']*,t,,iesw* h
the children and their success in networking with other area agencies and schools
Mr. Ron Jordan, of CERA Northwest, said they operate the Transitional Living Program for homeless
I
families and wanted to thank the Village for its support.
Ste *e Parker, of the Resource Center for the Elderly, said they operate the Shared Housing Program and
expressed the Resource Center's gratitude for the $2,000 they would receive.
Louis Velasco, Plan Commission member, asked why there had been a reduction in anticipated funds. Mr.
Sims explained it was due to fact that there was an increase in the number of entitlement communities., e.g.,
Kane County is a new recipient of C.D.B.G. funds. HUD also endows special funds with special projects;
therefore, grant allocations for areas with higher ethnic populations would be increased.
Commission member's were very disappointed with the idea of decreasing any funds to the public service
agencies, especially to the Clayground group, which is perceived as a very worthwhile program. Mr. Sims
again explained staff's basis for recommending the elimination of the grant allocation to Clayground.
Ms. Nancy Corry reiterated they had been utilizing Clayground's programs to assist the children in their
groups. Ms. Corry has been looking at ways they might share funds with Clayground because they have seen
amazing results with the children they have sent there.
The Plan Commission members decided to go through the proposed allocations and rework the reductions
in grants in a more equitable manner. After much discussion it was decided to take $750 from Access to
Care (the rationale being that Northwest Community Hospital and Alexian Brothers Hospital will be opening
a free clinic and serving those same people now served by Access), $500 from Boxwood Odyssey (the
rationale being that the same children in this group will benefit from Clayground programs), $400 from New
Horizons (the rationale being that this will bring their grant to the 1997 grant level) and $200 from the Single
Family Housing Rehabilitation Program. The $1,850 gleaned from these sources would be allocated to
Clayground, Inc. J
Chairman Hoffman closed the public hearing at 8:38.
Michael Zadel made a motion to reduce the budget as follows: in agreement with staff s recommendation
for Single Family Housing Rehab - from $162,545 to $141,945; reduce Access to Care by $750; reduce
Boxwood Odyssey Program by $500; reduce the New Horizons Program by $2,000 from the
and to fund Clayground, Inc. with $1,850. Louis Velasco seconded the motion.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Janus, Reddy, Tortorello, Velasco, Zadel and Hoffman.
Motion carried 6-0. Plan Commission recommendations for revising the C.D.B.G. budget will be presented
to the Village Board for review and approval.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 4
OLD BUSMSS: Rand Road Corridor Study - Recommended Revisions Drafted by Trustee Timothy
Corcoran - Notice for this hearing was published on January 16.
Chairman Hoffman opened the public hearing on the Rand Road Corridor Plan at 8:40 p.m. Mr. Hoffman
explained that the Commission had approved and presented the Plan some time ago. The Village Board and
Committee of the Whole suggested ch an ges to the Plan. Trustee Timothy Corcoran suggested some changes.
The Plan Commission was conducting another public hearing tonight to satisfy state statute.,
Chairman Hoffman said that several trustees had said that Rand Road was both residential and commercial
and had expressed the idea that the Plan approved by the Commission overemphasized the 'commercial
nature of the Corridor. Several Commission members disputed the idea that Rand Road is 50% commercial
and 50% residential. Judy Connolly, Planner, had been asked to investigate the land use and offered the fact
that 192 acres on Rand Road were utilized as commercial and 15 acres as residential. William Reddy
suggested the land used by churches and park districts be taken into consideration. These properties would
not be considered residential. Mr. Reddy said all "Corridors" could be considered residential by those
standards. He gave Central Road Corridor Plan as an example.
Mr. Hoffman continued: previous to the public hearing, the Planning Division forwarded to the Commission
copies of the Fall, 1996 Rand Road Corridor Plan, copies of the November, 1997 Plan revised by the
Committee of the Whole, and a synopsis of the changes proposed therein. Commission members reviewed
those documents and discussed their individual ideas and formulated the changes to be presented by the
Commission to the Village Board. The Commission directed staff to draft a revised synopsis from those
changes and include it with the minutes. Those proposed changes were:
IPage Trustee Corcoran's Revisions (sic) Plan Commission's Recommended Text
-
iv PREFACE
Paragraph 2
This study is an effort to take a proactive This study is an effort to take a proactive planning
planning stance so that when redevelop- stance so that when redevelopment opportunities
ment opportunities present themselves, present themselves, the Village can see how these
the Village can see how these planning planning strategies fit into the community's con -
strategies fit into the community's con- cept of '*here we should go" and "what we want
cept of "where we should go" and "what to be." It is 'Important to note that when redevelop_
we want to be." It is important to note ment opportunities do arise, measures should be
that when redevelopment opportunities taken to ensure there is minimal deterioration of
do arise, measures should be taken to residential neighborhoods.
ensurel
ration of resi-
dential neighborhoo sett lrt�
M1.1.1.1 � ...............
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 5
Page Trustee Corcoran's Revisions (sic)
Plan Commission's Recommended Text
iv Paragraph 3
7
The Rand Road Corridor Plan is the first
Rand Road brings a vitality to the community and
commerciatINNEERM corridor
enhances the economic base through sales of
being studied,. Being the major ROM
commercial goods and services to residents in a
WHOMMES§00corridor in, Mount,
large trade area extending far beyond the Village
Prospect Rand Road brings a ' vitality to
boundaries. At the same time, continued develop -
the community and enhances the eco-
ment of residential properties adjacent to the
nomic base through sales of commercial
Corridor unproves the stability and character of the
goods and services to residents in a large
community, adding to the richness of the entire
trade area extending far beyond the Vil-
Village. Development of the Rand Road Corridor
lage boundaries. At the same time, con-
should be sensitive to the adjoining residential
tinued development of residential proper-
development.
ties in the corridor improves the stability
and character of the community, adding to
the richness of the entireVillagelM,",
1 CHAPTER ONE
Paragraph 5
We@ A tavern and restaurant was located
A tavern and restaurant was located farther
further south on Rand Road. The Flame
south on Rand Road. The Flame Restaurant estab-
Restaurant established in the late 1950's
lished in the late 1950s on the west side of Rand,
on the west side of Rand, subsequently
subsequently changed to O'Brien Florist and is now
changed to O'Brien Florist and is -now
the Heart and Soul Cafe. Across the street, the
w, alt, Across the
former Redwood Restaurant and Tavern was
street,, the former Redwood, Restaurant
replaced...
and Tavern was replaced...
2 Paragraph I
(No Change)
. .................
12,BQi 1,,n, the RandRoad Col In the
Co, -=,, m,"al J2e've1opMgnJ S nice,
1980's, several commercial establish-
Rigad-,& ad C=*do In the 1980s, several corn
ments changed faces. Sunrise Pancake
mercial establishments changed faces. Sunrise
House replaced Scott's Big Boy.
Pancake House replaced Scott's Big Boy. A now
"ff, ,)"-,,Color Tile replaced
vacant site that was Color Tile replaced Gas USA
Gas USA and Tandy Leather Goods.
and Tandy Leather Goods. Mount Prospect Cin -
Mount Prospect Cinema became Bristol
ema became Bristol Court Banquet facility . Bulk-
Court Banquet f
acility. Bulki Gas was
0 Gas was replaced by Anthony's Hair Design at
replaced by Anthony's Hair Design at
Rand and Louis Street. JoJo's was replaced by
Rand and Louis Street. JoJo's was re-
Giordano's Pizza which has been razed.
placed by Giordano's Pizza'
Lmmmmm P, A" @vMt, - - ----- ............................
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAIT COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 6
Page
........... .... .......
Trustee Corcoran's Revisions (sic)
Plan Commission's Recommended Text
3
CATER TWO
(No Change)
Paragraph f
... These sewers then flow northeasterly
... 'These sewers then flow northeasterly to
to Feehanville ditch and the Ides Plaines
Feehanville ditch and the Lies Plaines River. Areas
Raver. Areas north of Kensington Road
north of Kensington Road and east of Randhurst
� a r
and east of Randhus , M
and Brickman Manor are serviced by the Citizens
a,,
are serviced by the Citizens Utiles
Utility Company.
I
Company.
4
Paragraph I
(No Change)
Residential development in the north
Mal, 1, Qjigm, ...j&md� _ Resi-
Rand Road study area includes the resi-
dential development in the north Rand Road study
dential subdivisions of Wedgewood Ter-
area includes the residential subdivisions of
race and Prospect Meadows, which were
Wedgewood Terrace and Prospect Meadows, which
developed in the mid to late 1940's. --
..
were developed in the Enid to late 1940s.
m
, N INAMW
�0
s Lp LA
Al a
l )VWW04* VA TV JLJ%0VAAAA5
4
Paragraph 5
(No Change)
... the :Rand :Road corridor has a mix of
commercial, retail and service businesses
... the Rand Road Corridor has a mix of commer-
beginning at Euclid Avenue at the north,
cial, retail and service businesses beginning at
including Shell Oil; IMMount
Euclid Avenue at the north, including Shell Oil; a
Prospect Cadillac dealership; and a strip
vacant Mount Prospect Cadillac dealership; and a
center containing Bally Fitness Center,
strip center containing Bally Fitness Center, Sport-
SportMart and Office Max. Twin Links
Mart and Office Max. Twin Links Miniature Golf,
Miniature Golf, Baker's Square and
Baker's Square and LaSalle Bank front on band
LaSalle Bank front on :nand Road in the
Road in the same vicinity.
same vicinity.
MOUNT PROSPECT M
MinutesLAN COMMISSION
9+M Pa
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting
Page 8
Page Trustee Corcoran's Revisions (sic)
Plan Commission's Recommended Text
4 Paragraph 10
No Change)
The Hill Street/Eastman Court cul-de-sac
subdivision has no direct frontage onto
The Hill Street/Eastman Court cul-de-sac subdivi-
Rand Road butM, has access to Hill
sion has no direct frontage onto Rand Road but
Street and its connection with Rand Road.
only has access to Hill Street and its connection
Also located on the east side of Rand
with Rand Road. Also located on the east side of
Road near Highland Street, ,are the
Rand Road near Highland Street, are the Field
A.16LOW.J. -Field Townhomes and the more
Townhomes and the more recent townhome devel-
recent townhome development at Hill
opment at Hill Street and Rand Road. Harvest
Street and "Rand Road. Harvest Heights
Heights single family subdivision was developed in
single family subdivision was developed
1988 and has its main access off of Rand Road via
in 1988 and has its main access off of
Business Center Drive. Homes on the west portion
Rand Road via Business Center Drive.
of the subdivision back directly upon the vacant
Homes on the west portion of the subdivi-
Courtesy site and Thunderbird Office properties.
sion back directly upon the vacant Cour-
Roy Berry Castle Heights Subdivision, platted in
tesy site and Thunderbird Office proper-
1926, Bluett Subdivision south of Gregory Street,
441 OIL- 'All SILAL1,116t
ties.-ZAAAW41114"41 %4%0 V V turw-M-3
and Serafin!s Subdivision saw strong development
in the post World War H era through the 1950s.
014"I'maiat. to -nio'lla"al ln'' IQ MA ILra AAL " Arw�_41�11_ Aft Ift
+V_WU_VV1 1131" W
Ile Albert Street townhomes were developed in
W.ULt"bW %JI& AM"ANA .%...,...,-Roy
1958 adjacent to commercial development on the
Berry Castle Heights Subdivision, platted
opposite side of Albert Street between Henry Street
in 1926, Bluett Subdivision south of
and Central Road....
Gregory Street, and Serafin's Subdivision
saw strong development in the post
World War Hera through the 195 O's. The
Albert Street townhomes were developed
in 1958 adjacent to commercial develop-
ment on the opposite side of Albert Street
. . ....
between Henry Street and Central Road....
5 Paragraph 6
(No Change)
northern Rand Road,
the largest parcel developed is Randhurst
Adjacent to northern Rand Road, the largest parcel
Shopping Center. The next largest prop-
developed is Randhurst Shopping Center. The next
erty drops to 9.5 acres for the combined
largest property drops to 9.5 acres for the combined
uses of Bally Fitness Center, Sport Mart
i uses of Bally Fitness Center, Sport Mart and Office
and Office Max, while the Mount Pros-
Max, while the Mount Prospect Cadillac site is 3.65
pect Cadillac site is 3.65 acres....
I a C *1, e s... OMMMMMMMMM11111"
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 9
Page Trustee Corcoran's Revisions(sic)
.............
Plan Commission's Recommended Text
...
5 Paragraph 7
- ----- -
('No Change)
Mount Prospect Plaza's 34 acre site is the
largest land development in the southern
Mount Prospect Plaza's 34 acre site is the largest
segment of the Rand Road corridor. Wal-
land development in the southern segment of the
Mart is just over 15.5 acres, while other
Rand Road Corridor. Wal-Mart is just over 15.5
large non-residential developments in the
acres,whileother large non-resi I dential develop..
southern Rand Road corridor include the
,end W* the, southern RandRoad Comnor include
former Courtesy Home Center site of 12
the former Courtesy Home Center site of 12 acres,
acres, followed by the
followed by the Mount Prospect Park District's 11
&egory Park (8 acres), Christian Life Church and
Christian Life Church and, College
College, and Joe Mitchell Buick of nearly 7.5
?Jlacres), and Joe Mitchell Buick of nearly
acres. Other developments over 2 acres in size
7.5 acres. Other developments over 2
include: the Thunderbird Office Cen-
acres in size include: the Thunderbird
ter/Thunderbird Bowl and Bristol Court.
Office Center/Thunderbird Bowl and
Bristol Court.
5 Paragraph 8
While Rand Road tends to attract com-
While Rand Road tends to attract commercial uses,
mercial uses, the area does it cludel=
the area does include some residential housing.
Mg. WMes Ste W= residential
Homesites front directly onto Rand Road near Hill
s i n
housing. Ho m i si
drealy onto
,front d
Street and single family home subdivisions are
Rand Road near Hill Street and single
located on either side of Rand Road between
family home subdivisions are located on
Elmhurst Road and Euclid Avenue. (See Map 5,
either side of Rand Road between
Existing Zoning.)The Rand Road Corridor area is
Elmhurst Road and Euclid Avenue. (See
mostly commercial in nature except for the few
.o., � A—M,%
nq,�
Map 5, Existing zoning.fi"Xr1_1hV__X1M1,,,,, ANAh
homesites and developments that front directly onto
0 1
. A - - - ;Q all
Rand Road near Hill Street and the single family
1"'VA _ll M..11ftk
'F
home subdivisions on either side of Rand Road
A JAV U, treety-eittv
between Elmhurst Road and Euclid Avenue. (See
Map 5, Existing Zoning.) Additionally, the Old
V
IASSM11 Nicol &
Orchard Country Club Townhomes and Creekside
1111,111U10L AVV "AAA,
Condominium development adjoin Rand Road with
A 0
access from Schoenbeck, Rand and Euclid res pec-
Z-.J,M'&Allai,ttg,�,)—A,dditionally, the Old Orchard
tivcly.
Country Club Townhornes and Creekside
Condominium development adjoin Rand
Road with access from Schoenbeck, Rand
and Euclid respectively.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 10
Trustee Corcoran's Revisl'ons (si*c)
...................
— -- — -- - __- . .................. . ....... . .........
Plan Commission's Recommended Text
Paragraph 2
(No Change)
A short distance to the south the former
Spear's Nursery was demolished to make
A short distance to the south the former Spear's
room for a townhome development at the
Nursery was demolished to make room for a
comer of Rand and Hill Street.
townhome development at the comer of Rand and
# * ,i,
4jpu PatLAXS01 A MAU 0*44 4 a, 4,01"o, , M
AA&A ma -SID
M
teethe hristian Co ge r
Hill Sr. TCe ,
is located on the west side of Rand Road and fronts
-1be Christian Life College and Church i's
Gregory Street....
located on the west side of Rand Road
and fronts Gregory Street....
. . . . . . . . ...................
. ..................... "I'll . . . . . ......... ----- —
P aragraph 3
(No Change)
Property located n i segment of
the Rand Road corridor "is
Property located in the south segment of the Rand
piarto zoned commercial reflecting the
Road Corridor is partly zoned commercial reflect -
existing land use in the area. .
ing the existing land use in the area.
. . . . . . .......................... .........
.............
Paragraph 7
As stated earlier, the Rand Road corridor
As stated earlier, the Rand Road Corridor I*,qprimar-
i
""61,6141s to
ily commercial in character. There is however, a
character,
section at the northern end of the Corridor that is
-15a -XXV, V1fX0 v %OJL #a%0%0AoAWAA C41f 1"INJI tllwl VIM
0
94 0 _., A.4 tly
VX 4,11%.0 NOVIT 16 A*;;
ma ia
I Vi241%J%0LA,L1AAA
............. . . .....
predominantly residential.
. . .... .... - -------
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 11
F
Page Trustee Corcoran's Revisions (sic)
Trustee _
"MEN
8 Paragraph 3
The most recent revision of the Compre-
hensive Plan of Mount Prospect was
completed and published in November,
1994. The Generalized Land Use Plan
shows theRand Road Corridor
Abdkft N& Ism.,
•
j&MAINNI Ala
ket A
FAAAAollL with a mixture
of highway commercial land uses and
segments o residential developments,
?f
Aft 1" 4.0 UNA— 1— 4.1. 0 MgAZ&
L&A VJAV AIVA, 44t"%W�at;0 *XV1447, '111UT,
UT
&14 C%_A 4,iww_l
Gem
'I k
I— A- CLS, 14 al'a *Arawl .1110I.Li �V�a Im",
&L%0 V WIN1114AAAN.03414,
�'XIU7t! %leef), ffl,
. .......... . . . g -r
44 C54 10'as
71nV0ktV_XjLW1
•hanges to the Generalized Land
Use Plan that should be reflected, include
the Creekside Condominium development
at Old Orchard Country Club and the
townhouse developments at Hill Street
and Rand Road. Commercial develop-
ment changes located in proximity to the
Rand Road Corridor, such as the
W ft''L44E 'General Cinema,
ter eon W1 QN0,87 Of,
Jewel Osco, Home Depot, and East Side
Mario's should also be reflected in the
Generalized Land Use Plan.
NNININOWN
Plan Commission's Recommended Text
The most recent revision of the Comprehensive
Plan of Mount Prospect was completed and pub-
lished in November, 1994. The Generalized Land
Use Plan shows the Rand Road Corridor with
predominantly highway commercial uses mixed
with -sections of isolated residential developments,
especially in the northwest section of Rand Road
near Old Orchard Country Club and single family
development between Euclid Avenue and the
commercial development north of Kensington
Road. Changes to the Generalized Land Use Plan
that should be reflected, include the Creekside
Condominium development at Old Orchard Coun-
try Club and the townhouse developments at Hill
Street and Rand Road. Commercial development
changes such as the perimeter commercial uses of
General Cinema, Jewel Osco, Home Depot, and
two available establishments should also be re-
flected in the Generalized Land Use Plan.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 12
PageTrusteeCorcoran's Revisions (sic) Plan Commission's Recommended Text
1 3;
A, EMU[ OWN
4P
so
-Ant", I II
No
11 11.1 IN 1111111
1 E)w'
am oil lwf=.��Sz
U."
1
Mi, a MI P PI
19,111
,
t '
oil
a
Mill,
Tell
'11010
74FY NI I,V off
i. (II
10 01 ti
I 11 011"i,
I Rp/ 14qit
Rf, witoll
M
t
fm
---------------------
Paragraph 8
(No Change)
Land at the "un,ulvill comer of
ttle!e4!0fi91NW110N� and
Land at the comer of Business Center Drive and
Rand Road has been the subject of several
Rand Road has been the subject of several inquiries
inquiries for possible commercial/low
for possible commercial/low density residential
density residential development. Re-
development. Recently, the Mount Prospect Park
cently, the Mount Prospect Park District
District (UTPD) purchased 1.68 acres of this
1 I(MPPI purchased 1.68 acre#
parcel. In 1988, the MPPD had purchased 2.53
parce1_0U1VJV,%iol LV`,%J Y "A %AA LJ LU:L%O
via
.,,s of land having access from Rand Road for a
ir`In 1988, the MPPD had purchased
nature center. The remaining 2.2 acres south of the
2.53 acres of land having access from
MPPD property should be considered for a unified
Rand Road for a nature center. The re-
i commercial development. A site plan for the entire
maining 2.2 acres south of the NTPD
area should be coordinated between the MPPD and
property should be considered for a uni-
the Village. Special attention should be given to
fied commercial development. A site
11 access control and site amenities.
M lan for the entire area should be coordi-
nated between the NTPD and the Village.
Special attention should be given to ac-
cess control and site amenities.
. . ...... ...... ................ - ...... . .....
. ... . . . .......................
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 13
Page Trustee Corcoran's Revisions(sic) Plan Commission's Recommended Text
. . . . . ............ .
9 Paragraph 9
(No Change)
Rga*&uJiA, - An area that could
a -be developed as low density residen-
&dd An area that could be developed as
tial-is,the area south of'Louis Anthony
to densi',ty residential Is 'the area south of Louts
Hair Salon owned, "by Century Supply
ny Y
Antho H * r Salon owned, by Centur, Supply,
Company on the west side" of Rand Road
Company, on, the, west side of Rand Road, north of
north of Thayer and adjacent to Louis
Thayer and adjacent to Louis StreetW,
Street...
10 Paragraph2
(No Change)
1. The triangle formed by Kensington and
rand Roads in the west edge of Brickman
1. The triangle formed by Kensington and Rand
Manor, H
Roads in the west edge of Briclanan Manor, south-
. . . . . . . . . f
rlshould be
east of the Rand and Kensington Roads intersec-
considered for redevelopment under a
tion, should be considered for redevelopment under
PUD concept and the possible creation of
a PLJD concept and the possible creation of a TIF
a TIF District.
District.
10 Paragraph, 4
il
a A&AAft*qL*1., L1416111
"AA, WXIAW, p 1644V _A"114'31
Currently, the F first Chicago N'BD Bank building
h eight, of" four stories -is the highest commercial
004ai ALMA
*>& I Coftilfti--b A4141 U94V 1.
building in the north section of Rand Road Com -
ft Aft
dor. Randhurst Shopping Center, structure height
5 *3 U &AVIVUS %wo 14,%,04 W,0%%0%.-VU0
exceeds the bufld tigheight limit ermitted in the
IB
U11,Wl-, 111AUX"I'l-15-1, 11w1w
-3 Zoning District of three stories and therefore
IrNlft ....................
is another exception to the current standard of a
I 411WA, %*0^1Wr,%0rV1 Ll AV
,
maximum of three stories in height findustrial
or 1,
0
1U VK_ 4" 4W,A A
and commercial uses. Also, no buildings devel-
_q
711M
oiled in the south section of Rand Road Corridor
exceed two stories in height. The zoning classifica-
ti"ons for non-residential uses li'mit the building
Currently, no buildings developed in the
height to a m1axitnum offliree stories for industrial
south section of Rand Road corridor ex-
and commercial uses.
ceed two stories in height. The zoning
classifications for non-residential uses
limit the building height to a maximum of
three stories for industrial and commercial
uses.
12 Paragraph 5
(No Change)
The economic impact the south section of
Rand Road has on the Village's total
The economic impact the south section of Rand
i revenues will undoubtedly increase, espe-
Road has on the Village's total revenues will un-
cially with full occupancy of the
doubtedly, increase, especially w.*Ithfull occu, pancy
Courtesy-Menard's site and the-potICTILlu'l
of the Cour tesy-Menatd's site and, the Century,
'IN
Stipply property at Loin is and Rand,
It
Y----M-IKF-the Century Supply
WNW I . .............. property at Louis and Rand.
W1
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 14
............
Pae
Trustee or oran's Revisions (sic)
III I00
Plan C'ommission's Recommended Text
wow
12
Paragraph S
The long term vitality of the Rand Road
The long term vitality of the Rand Road Corridor is
corridor is critical to the economic well-
critical to the economic well-being for the entire
being for the entire VillagJJW4,,1M",''
Village. Therefore, the component activities Which
oa
go to make up the Rand :Road Corridor including
s
land use, a safe and efficient transportation system,
#l#AQS1VJWJ-.—Vierefore, the; compo-
and a pleasant visual and aesthetic appearance, are
nent activities which go to make up the
all important in the overall economic viability of
Rand Road corridor including land use, a
this commercial Corridor.
safe and efficient transportation system,
and a pleasant visual and aesthetic appear-
ance are all important in the overall eco-
nomic viability of this commercial corri-
dor.
12
Paragraph 14
my
Finally, the balance between the commercial needs
4
.
of the village and the needs of the residential
e o ,
Yds
neighborhoods must be maintained. This balance
� hborhoo
a
i
recognizes that much of the commercial tax base of
G
Mount Prospect is generated by the Rand Road
U
Corridor.
019111a mn MENWAIEWWWW"
MIMI'
15
ACTION PLAT
(No Change)
LAND USE AND ZONING - Although
LAND USE AND ZONING - Although the 2.5
the 2.5 miles of :Rand Road is character-
miles of Rand Road is characterized by commercial
ized by
development, it also contains three significant
sections of important residential uses, ranging from
mcommercial development, it
detached single family to townhorne and condo -
also contains three ft,Nompections
minium....
of important residential uses, ranging
from detached single family to townhome
and condominium ...
15
Issue Statement 3.-44tellilwi4irmjl*vlltege-f�offt4 4. ,
. 111 4.144
(No Change)
, �
Issue Statement 3: The parcel adjoining the MPPD
property" and Business Center give is being ac-
tively marketed for development.
JO ,Wu//' awN Grvm"' ,I n I, i4JY9 (IDhr f r„SIV M% N OWJM'M,i9Nw W^ol 1N
OIII�V 1 f A f J i r ,r IIrr
µ r IYI NfRfF,VINY Vyl^ 1V
Y
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting Page 15
ROW! . ......... 0 . . .............. . . . . . . .
Page Trustee Corcoran's Revisions (sic)
. . . ....... 000 .... . . . ...
Plan Commission's Recommended xt
15 Action Step 3: The Mount Prospect Park
i0 . .......... . . ..........
(No Change)
District IN 1"
acres inctuding, property surrounding the
Action Step 3: The Mount Prospect Park District
Nature Center. The remaining 2.2 acres
owns 4.2 acres including property surrounding the
in this area should be considered for a
Nature Center. The remaining 2.2 acres in this area
unified commercial development. A site
should, be considered for a unified commercial
plan of the entire area must be coordi-
development. A site plan of the entire area must be
nated with the Park District for proper
coordinated with the Park District for proper access
access control and other amenities.
control and other amenities.
16 Issue Statement 4.- The 12 acre -
JV
(No Change)
Menard's V, ill 01, erty
ry
with frontage on Business Center DrIVe
� Issue Statement 4.- The 12 acre Menard's (formerly
and Rand Road has been idled since va-
Courtesy) property with frontage on Business
cated by Courtesy Home Center. This site
Center Drive and Rand Road has been 'Idle since
11
is appropriately identified as general
vacated by Courtesy Home Center. This site is
commercial.
appropriately identified as general commercial.
16 Issue Statement 6.- Giordano's Pizza Res-
Issue Statement 6.- Giordano's Pizza Restaurant has
taurant has been closed since late 1994.
been razed.
Damage to the structure has been 'docu-
mented by Building Division staff.
(No Change)
Action Step 6: Steps to be taken to
•'ALI ANX If " LVA, 11 ,,-M,14-work with
Action Step 6.- Steps to be taken to work with the
the property owner for a use consistent
property owner for a use consistent with thegeneral
I with the general commercial classification
commercial classification and orient the proposed
and orient the proposed improvement to
improvement to take advantage of shared parking
take advantage of shared parking and
and access with adjacent bowling" and banquet
access with adjacent bowling and banquet
facilities.
. ......... ............ . ....... . facilities.
William Reddy made a motion to approve the Rand Road Corridor Study modifications as outlined by
the Plan Commission and noted above. Michael Zadel seconded the motion.
0
Upon Roll Call, AYES: Boege, Janus, Reddy, Tortorello, Velasco, and Hoffman
NAYS: None
OT mm
Chairman Hoffman stated that the motion was carried and closed the public hearing at 9:23 p.m.
Chairman Hoffman said if there is no more discussion, he would entertain a motion to adjourn.
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of February 4, 1998 Meeting
Louis Velasco said that, under old business, he would like to fortify his recommendation to not devote
too much of the downtown redevelopment for retail business, citing the current trouble encountered by
the Buffalo Grove Town Center development.
Michael Zadel made a motion to adjourn. Carol Tortorello seconded themotion. Motion carried 6-0.
Meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
- - ---- . ..........................................
Barbara Swiatek, Recording Secretary
I
..................... 11111 Now
I
CAF/
2/24/98
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO INCLUDE THE
RAND ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect did adopt the
Official Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Mount Prospect through passage of Ordinance No.
4681 on November 15,1994; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have amended
the Official Comprehensive Plan from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined
that it would be in the best interest of the Village to further amend the Official Comprehensive Plan
for the Village of Mount Prospect to include the Rand Road Corridor Study, which study was
considered by the Mount Prospect Plan Commission in February, 1998, shall be included in the
Appendix of the Official Comprehensive Plan.
WHEREAS, pursuant to 65 ILLS 5/11-12-7 of the 1,11ino"I's Com,piled Statutes', the Plan Commission
of the Village of Mount Prospect held a Public Hearing on February 4, 1998, pursuant to proper legal
notice having being published in the Mount PLogvect Journal andTooyes on January 16, 1998, said
Public Hearing was for the purpose of considering a proposed change to the Official Comprehensive
Plan of Mount Prospect, as specified hereinabove; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have recognized the importance of the having a
Rand Road Corridor Study included as part of the Official Comprehensive Plan and have determined
that the best interests of the Village would be served by amending the Official Comprehensive Plan
of the Village of Mount Prospect to include the 1998 Rand Road Corridor Study.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
amend the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect and include the 1998 Rand
Road Corridor Study, as part of the Appendix of the Official Comprehensive Plan.
SECTIOL4
The Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby authorized and
directed to file notice of the amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount
Prospect with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, as provided by the Statutes of the State of
Illinois.
SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby directed to publish,
in pamphlet form, said Rand Road Corridor Study, dated December 23,1997, as an amendment
Comprehensive Plan
Rand Road Corridor Study
Page 2 of 2
to the Official Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Mount Prospect, pursuant to the Statutes of the
State of Illinois made and provided.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
SUBJECT: BID RESULTS - WELLER CREEK BANK STABILIZATION/13RIDGE
REPLACEMENT, PHASE I - EMERSON TO MAIN
On March 31, 1998 at 10:00 AM, sealed bids were opened for the Weller Creek Bank Stabiliza-
tion/Bridge Replacement Phase l - Emerson to Main project.
b I J
The limits of the project are from the east side of Emerson Street vehicular bridge to'the west
property line of the residential lot just west of the Main Street pedestrian bridge. Improvements
included in this project are:
* Channel bottom stabilization using 12 -foot wide monoslab paver installation.
* Stabilization using A -Jacks and bioengineering solutions along the north bank.
* Installation of sheet piling along the south bank of the reach.
* Removal Of the existing superstructure and substructure of the existing Main Street pedes-
trian bridge, replacement of the substructure with concrete abutments supported on driven
pile, and replacement of the superstructure with a "Continental" type superstructure.
* Removal of the existing superstructure of the existing Emerson Street bridge, replacement
with precast prestressed beams and deck with modifications to the abutment seats, and adja-
cent roadway work between Hiawatha Trail and Berkshire Lane. The bridge deck is too low
and causing an obstruction to the flow of the creek,
Removal and thinning of trees, restoration of disturbed grounds, and installation of new trees
and bushes,
Seventeen contractors picked up contract bid documents, and five contractors submitted bids.
The bids ranged from a low of $991,543.40 by Martam Construction, Inc. of Elgin, IL, to a high
Page two
Bid Results - Weller Creek Bank Stabilization/Bridge
Replacement, Phase I -:Emerson To Main
April 2, 1998
of $1,321,047.90 by Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete Inc. of Prairie View; IL. The design en-
gineer's estimate for the project was $1,075,030, whereas the Weller Creek study estimate was
$850,000 -
ANALYSIS OF BI -DS
Our I design engineer, Rust Environment & Infrastructure, reviewed all bids. All bidders submit-
ted bid bonds in the amount of 5% of their total bids, as required by the contract documents. All
bids were checked for accuracy. A multiplication* error and unit price error was found in
Glenbrook's and IHC Group's bids. All bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. Below
is a summary of the bids as corrected, and a detailed accounting is attached.
Bidde'r
Martam Construction, Inc.
Elgin, IL
Illinois Construction Corp.
St. Charles, IL
Rausch Construction Co.
Broadview, IL
IHC Group
Elgin, IL
Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete, Inc.
Prairie View, IL -
Engineer's Estimate
Total Bid
$9917543.40
$1,118,307.07
$11185,219-00
$153161377.30
0
$1,321,047.90
$13,075,030.00
The low bid is under Rust's design engineering estimate, but nearly $142,000 over the 6fig*mau
Weller Creek study estimate completed M* June of 1996- Major factors that contributed to, the
increase are as follows:
Site Preparation: Additional trees were removed and extensive clearing on the north bank
added, $34,000
Revegetation: Additional trees and shrubs and stabilization fabric added. Project limits greater
than anticipated. $22,000
Page three 11
Bid Results - Weller Creek Bahk Stabilization/Bridge
Replacement, Phase I - Emerson To Main
April 2, 1998
Bridge Replacements: Foundation requirements greater than anticipated once soils- investiga-
tion performed. Sidewalk replacement added to Berkshire Lane. Railings required for sidewalk
adjacent to grade transitions. Guard rail and signs added at end of Main Street. $63,000.
Main Street Paving: Added to project to replace curb and pave surface. $18,,000,
The low bidder, Martam, Construction, Inc. has previously completed projects for the Village,
includingstreet improvements, Lake Briarwood bridge rehabilitation, and more currently, the
1%-1
Phase I Streetscape project. To date, all their work has been acceptable.
F UNDMG
Funding for this project is shown on page 299 of the 1998 budget, account numbers 597704-
690101 and 597704-690102 coming , where $900,000 is allocated, $500,000" of which is commg from a
grant from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. On that same page, there is a total of
$1,325,000 allocated for the Maple/Berkshire Sanitary Sewer Improvements. Current design
engineer's estimate for this project is $1,200,000. This savings, along with the strong possibility
of receiving an IEPA lo' -interest loan, should result in sufficient savings to offset the increased
costs for the Weller Creek project. I have discussed this with Finance Director Brian Caputo,
and he concurs.
Based on Rust's analysis of the bids, Rust recommends, and I concur, a contract be awarded to
Martarn Construction, Inc. M* the amount not to exceed $991,543.40.
GRA/td/attach.
c: Deputy Director of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey
Finance Director Brian Caputo
Public Works Superintendents
Village Engineer Jeff Wulbecker
Rust Envirom-nent & Infrastructure, Melcy Pond
x:\files\frontoff\creeks\Weller\PhaselRe.cmd
fWi
"qC
G. N
O
2 Z
J m
f-` C4
.o
le
�a 52
� Wus
"
a 2 CLU.
�
N O
aCW GC
W 0
OC
(> J
w
J
J
W
TO VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 2., 1998
SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES
WELLER CREEK BANK STABILIZATION/BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT - PHASE I - EMERSON TO MAIN
In June of 1996, the Final Report for the Weller Creek Bank Stabilization Study was
presented to the Village Board by Rust Environment & Infrastructure.
On October 7., 1997, the Village Board approved a contract with Rust to prepare plans
and specifications and secure all permits necessary to construct Phase I - Emerson to
Main. Funding for these services is coming from a $500,000 Grant from the Illinois
Department of National Resources (IDNR.).
Bids were received on March 31, 1998 and will be presented to the Village Board on
April 7, 1998. If approved, construction will begin by late April. As a condition of the
IDNR Grant all of the $500,000 must be spent by June 30, 1998. This means
construction must proceed at a very fast pace and will require the services of a full-time
construction inspector to see that the required amount of work is completed within the
allotted time.
a
Rust Environment & Infrastructure has provided construction engineering services on
five of the ten stormwater management projects completed to date and has always done a
commendable job. Therefore, I requested a proposal from Rust to provide full time
construction engineering services for the Phase I Weller Creek Bank Stabilization Project.
Rust's fee for completing these services will be on an hourly basis at a not -to -exceed fee
of $72,200. Attached is a copy of their Scope of Services.
As a cost comparison check to their proposal Rust provided similar services for three
projects fairly comparable in size to this project:
See-Gwun/Milburn Sanitary Sewer
Hatlen Heights Sanitary Sewer
Fairview Gardens Sanitary Sewer
Const. Cost Eng,.,Fee
$1.11543,330 $84,5700
$1,780.1000 $123,9400
$ 657,000 $ 47,000
Page 2
Construction Engineerifig Services
Weller Creek Bank Stab flization/Bridge
Replacement - Phase I - Emerson to Main
April 2, 1998
I feel Rust's fee is reasonable and therefore recommend they be awarded a contract to
provide Construction Engineering Services for the Phase I Weller Creek Bank
il Stabilization Project. in an amount not -to -exceed $72,200. Funding for these services can
be found on Page 299, Account Numbers 597704-690101 and 597704-690102 of the
1998 Budget where $900,000 has been allocated.
If you concur with this recommendation I would request it be placed on the Agenda for
consideration by the Village Board at their April 7, 1998 meeting.
Glen R. Andler
GRA/eh
Deputy Director of Public Works Sean Dorsey
Finance Director Brian Caputo
Village Engineer Jeff Wulbecker
All Public Works Superintendents
x:files\frontofAadmln\wellcrke.ng
n WIN
ani Rust Environment & infrastructure
,
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
PROJECT NAME: WELLER CREEK STREAMBANK STAB JZATION
PHASE I CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES (".Project")
This Agreement is by and between
Village of Mount Prospect C'Client")
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
and,
Rust Environment & Infrastructure Inc. ("Rust")
3121 Butterfield Road
Oak Brook, EL 60523
Who agree as follows:
Client hereby engages Rust to perform the services described in Part I ("Services"), and Rust agrees
to perform the Services for the compensation set forth in Part 111. Rust shall be authorized to
commence the Services upon execution of this Agreement.- Client, and Rust agree that this signature
page, together with Parts I-IV and attachments referred to therein, constitute the entire agreement
between them relating to the Project ("Agreement").
APPROVED FOR CLIENT
By:
Printed Name:
APPROVED FOR RUST
Title: Title:t P n a i d!L-ni
Date:
Date:
1
PART I " `
RUST'S RESPONS11BIOLITILES
This project consists of,channel and bridge improvements along Weller Creek from Emerson
01
Street to about 100 feet west of Main Street in Mount Prospect, lois. Improvements
include:
m
channel bottom stabilization using 12 -foot W1We onoslab paver installation
stabilization using A -Jacks and bioengineering solutions along the north bank
installation of sheet piling along the south bank of the reach
removal of existing superstructure and substructure of the existing Main Street
pedestrian bridge and replacement of the substructure with concrete abutments
supported on driven pile and replacement of the superstructure with a "Continental"
type superstructure
removal of the existing superstructure of the existing Emerson Street bridge,
replacement with precast prestressed beams and deck with modifications to the
abutment seats, and adjacent roadway work between Hiawatha Trail and Berkshire
Lane.
Services to be provided for the Project are as follows:
1. Assign a Project Manager who will coordinate Project activities, and will be the principal
liaison between the Client Rust, the Contractor, and regulatory agencies.
2. Assist the Client M* assembling the contract documents for execution by the Contractor and
the Client. Furnish copies of the executed contract documents to the Client, Rust, and
Contractor.
3. Attend weekly progress meetings for Project, from award of bids to Project completion.
4. Conduct a preconstruction conference with Contractor, Client, utilities, Resident Project
Representative, and other affected parties.
5. Provide baselines for contractor's layout of the work.
6. Project Manager will visit the site once per week during Contractor's on-site construction
operations to become familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine,
in general, if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. During
such visits and on the basis of on-site observations, Rust shall keep the Client informed of
ro),
the progress of the Contractor's work. Rust will disapprove or reject work that is found
not in conformance with the contract documents.
7. Review shop drawings and other equipment submittals as required by the contract
documents.
8. Prepare contract change orders and fi
:field modifications for Client execution initiate and
respond to correspondence with the Contractor and the Client, respond to requests from the
Contractor and the Client, coordinate required start-up and instructional services to be
provided to the Client, and perform other construction contract related admi'm'stration
during the Project. 1,
9. Process monthly applications for payment submitted by Contractor, and forward to the
Client for execution with recommendations for approval and payment.
10. Perform a field observation of the completed work before payment is processed for the
Contractor.
11. Review Contractor -supplied as -built drawings for accuracy, and provide the Client with
three (3) full-sized (24" x, 36") prints and one set of mylars of as -built drawings.
12. Coordinate site visits by appropriate (design discipline) personnel at appropriate stages of
construction to review the quality of the work and to determine, in general, whether the
work conforms with the contract documents.
13. Supply the Client with copies of correspondence generated by the Contractor and Rust.
14. Witness field testing, where applicable, of the facilities furnished under the contract to assist
in determining conformance with the contract documents.
1. Provide one Project Representative during construction, based on the Contractor's work
schedule, (project representation shall consist of full-time observation of the Contractor's
work by a person under the guidance of Rust), during the construction period, to observe
and record construction progress.
2. For the purposes of this Agreement, the following assumptions have been made in order to
estimate observation hours: Provide the Project Representative for 40 hours per week for
a period of 20 weeks, and for 20 hours per week for a period of 4 weeks,, for a total of 880
hours. The 20 -hour per week inspection will take place during punch list and restoration
phase of the Project. Total observation hours will not exceed 880 unless Contractor's
contract time is changed.
3
PA
. x-xRT H
CUIENT'S RESPONS11BILITIOU1
=4
Client., at its expense, shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the Services.
11
Furnish Rust available information, all of which Rust may rely upon without independent
verification in performing the Services.
B. REPRESENTATIVE
Designate a representative for the Project who shall have the authority to transmit instructions,
receive informafion, interpret and define Client's policies and make decisions with respect to the
Services.
C. DECISIONS .
Provide all criteria and full information as to Client requirements for the Project, obtain (with
RusVs. assistance, if applicable) necessary approvals and permits, attend Project -related meetings,
provide interim reviews on an agreed-upon schedule, make decisions on Project alternatives, and
generally participate in the Project to the extent necessary to allow. Rust to perform the Services.
141
PART 1H
COMPENSATION, BILLING, AND PAYMENT
Client shall pay Rust for the Services in accordance with the following:
Compensation for the Services will be on an hourly rate basis plus reimbursables with a not -to -exceed
amount of $72,200.
Rust will bill. the Client no less frequently than monthly, with net payment due in 30 days. Unless
Client provides Rust with a written statement of any objections to the bill ithing 15 days of receipt,
Client shall be deemed to accept the bill as submitted,
Rust Environment & Infrastructure PART W
1. STANDARD UFC Services shall be performed in accordance with the standard
of professional practice ordinarily exercised by the applicable profession at the time and
withinthe localitywhere the Services are performed. Professional services are not subject
to, and Rust can not provide, any warranty or guararitee, express or implied, including
warrarities or guarantees contained in any uniform commercial code. Any such warranties
or goaranteacontained in any purchase orders, requisitions or notices to proceed issued by
Client are specifically objected to.
2. CHANGE OF SCOPE The scope of Services set forth in this Agreement is based on
facts known at the time of execution of this Agreement, including. if applicable,
information supplied by Client. For some projects involving conceptual or process
development services, scope may not be fully definable during initial phases. As the
Project progresses, facts discovered may indicate that scope must be redefined.
3. SAFETY. Rust has established and maintains corporate programs and procedures for
the safety of its employees. Unless specifically included as a service to be provided under
this Agreement Rust specifically disclaims any authority or responsibilfty for general job
site safety and safety of persons other than Rust employees.
4, DELAYS. If events beyond the control of Client or Rust, including, but not limited to,
ffir, flood, explosion, riot, strike, war. process shutdown, act of God or the public enemy,
and act or regulation of any government agency, result in delay to any schedule established
in this Agreement such schedule shall be amended to the extent necessary to compensate
for such delay. In the event such delay exceeds 60 days, Rust shall be entitled to an
equitable adjustment in compensation
5. TFAVAINATIONISUSPENSION. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon
30 days written notice to the other party. Client shall pay Rust for all Services, including
profit relating thereto. rendered prior to termination, plus any expenses of termination.
In the event either party defaults in its obligations under this Agreem ent (including Client's
obligation to make the payments required hereunder), the non -defaulting party may, after
7 days written notice stating its intention to suspend performance under the Agreement if
cure of such default is not commenced and diligently continued, and failure of the
defmltingparly to commence cure within such time limit and diligently continue, suspend
performance under this Agreement.
6. OPINIONS OF CONSTRUCTION COST. Any opinion of construction costs
prepared by Rust is supplied for the general guidance of the Client only. Since Rust has no
control over competitive bidding or market conditions, Rust cannot guarantee the accuracy
of such opinions as compared to contract bids or actual costs to Client.
7. RELAnONSHIP %T11I CONTRACTORS. Rust shall serve as Client's professional
representative for the Services, and may make recommendations to Client concerning
actions relatingto Clierifs contracUm but Rust specifically disclaims any authority to direct
or supervise the means. methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction
selected by Client's contractors.
S. CONSTRUCTION REVIEW. For projects involving construction, Client
acknowledges that under generally accepted professional practice, interpretations of
construction documents in the field are normally required, and that performance of
construction -related services by the design professional for the project perm its errors or
omissions to be identified and corrected at comparatively low cost Client agrees to hold
Rustharmless from any claims resulting from performance of construction -related services
by persons other than Rust.
9. INSURANCE. Rust will maintain insurance coverage for Professional, Comprehensive
General, Automobile, Worker's Compensation, and Employees Liability in amounts in
accordance with legal, and Ruses business requirements. Certificates evidencing such
coverage will be provided to Client upon request For projects involving construction,
Client agrees to require its construction contrnctoro if any, to include Rust as anadditional
insured on its policies relating to the Project Ruses coverages referenced above shall, in
such case, be excess over contractors primary coverage. I
10. IL4ZARDOUS MATERIAL. Hazardous materials may exist at a site where there is
no reason to believe they could or should be present. Rust and Client agree that the
discovery of unanticipated hazardous materials constitutes a changed condition mandating
a renegotiation of the scope of work. Rust agrees to notify Client as soon as practically
possible should unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials be
encountered. Client acknowledges and agrees that it retains title to all hazardous material
existing on the site and shall report to the appropriate federal, state or local public agencies,
as required, any conditions at the site that may present a potential danger to the public
health, safety or the environment. Client shall execute any manifests or forms in
connection with transportation, storage and disposal of hazardous materials resulting from
the site or work on the site or shall authorize Rust to execute such documents as Client's
agent. Client waives any claim against Rust and agrees to defend, indemnify, and save Rust
harmless from any claim or liability for injury or loss arising from Ruses discovery of
unanticipated hazardous materials or suspected hazardous materials.
11. INDEMNITM To the fullest extent permitted by law, Rust shall indemnify and save
harmless Client from and agaM, loss, liability. and damages sustained by Client its agents,
employees, and representatives by reason of injury or death to persons or damage to
tangible property to the extent caused directly by the willful misconduct or failure to adhere
to the standard of care described in Paragraph I above of Rust its agents or employees.
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Client shall defend, indemnify, and save harmless
Rust from and %pinst, loss, liability, and damages sustained by Rust, its agents, employees,
and toptmenWIves by reason of claims for injury or death to persons. damages to tw4oble
property. to the exte caused directly by any of the following: (a) any substance, condition,
element, or m aterial or any combination of the foregoing (I) produced, emitted or released
fi-an the Project or tested by Rust under this Agreement, or (b) operation or management
of the Project. Client also agrees to require its construction contractor, if any, to include
Rust as an indemnitee under any indemnification obligation to Client.
12. LMUTATIONS OF LIABILITY. No employee or agent of Rust shall have
individual liability to Client.
Client Wes that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Ruses total liability to Client for
any and all ir4uries, claims, losses, expenses or damages whatsoever arising out of or in any
way related to the Project or this Agreement f1rom any causes including. but not limited to,
Ruses negligence. errors,, omissions, strict liability. or breach of contract and whether
claimed directly orbyway of contribution, shall, not exceed the total compensation received
by Rust under this Agreement. If Client desires_a limit of liability greater than that
provided above. Client and Rust shall, include in Part III of this Agreement the amount of
such limit and the additional compensation to be paid to Rust for assumption of such
additional risk.
CLIENT FOR CONSEQUENTIAL. INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, OR
PUNITIVE DAMAGES.
13. ACCESS, Client shall provide Rust safe access to any premises necessary for Rust to
provide the Services.
14. REUSE OF PROJECT DELIVERABLES. Reuse of any documents or other
deliverables, including electronic media, pertaining to the Project by Client for any purpose
other than that for which such documents or deliverables were onginally prepared, or
alteration of such documents or deliverables without written verification or adaptation by
Rust for the specific purpose intended, shall be at the Client's risk. Further. all title blocks
and the engineer's seal, if applicable. shall be removed if and when Client provides
deliverables in electronic media to another entity. Client agrees that relevant analyses,
findings andrepotts provided in electronic media shall also be provided in ffhard copy' and
thatthe hard copy shall govern in the caw of a ilismparipy between the two versions, and
shall be held as the official set of drawings� as signed and sealed. Client shall be afforded
a period of 30 days in which to check the hard copy against the electronic media. In the
event that any error or inconsistency is found as a 'result of this process, Rust shall be
advised and the inconsistency shall be corrected at no additional cost to Client. Following
the expiration of this 30 -day period. Client shall beer all responsibility for the care, custody
and control of the electronic media. In addition. Client represents that it shall retain the
necessary mechanisms to read the electronic media, which Client acknowledges to be of
only limited duration. Client agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Rust from all
claims, damages, and expenses, (including reasonable litigation costs), arising out of such
reuse or alteration by Client or others acting through Client -
15. AMENDNWM. This Agreement upon execution by both parties hereto, can be
amended only by a written instrument signed by both parties.
16. ASSIGNMENT. Except for assignments (4) to entities which control, or are
controlled by. the parties hereto or (b) resulting from operation of law, the rights and
oblip6oris of this Agreement cannot be assigned by either party without written permission
of the other party. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of any
permitted assigns.
17. STATUTES OF LD41TA110N. To the fulled extent permitted by law, parties agree
that, except for claims for indemaitication, the time period for bringing claims under this
Agreement shall expire one year after Project completion.
1& DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Patties shall attempt to settle disputes wising under this
ant by discussion between the parties senior representatives of mamgement. If any
dispute cannot be resolved in this manner. within a reasonable length of time, parties agree
to attempt non-binding mediations or any other method of alternative dispute resolutions
prior to filing any legal proceedings. In the event any actions are brought to enforce this
Agreement, the prevailing peity shall be entitled to collect its litigation costs from the other
party.
19. NO WAIVER. No waiver by either party of any default by the other party in the
performance of any particular section of this Agreement shall invalidate any other section
of this Agreement or operate as a waiver of any future default, whether like or different in
character.
20. NOPmm'DENMOAFtY Nothing contained in this Agreement nor the
performance of the parties hereunder, is intended to benefit, nor shall inure to the benefit
of; any third party, including Clients contractors, if any.
21. SEVERABILITY. The various terms. provisions and covenants herein contained
shall be deemed to be separate and severable, and the invalidity or unenforceability of any
of them shall not affect or impair the validity or enforceability of the remainder.
22. AUTHORITY. The persons signing this Agreement warrant that they have the
authority to sign as, or on behalf of; the party for whom they are signing
AGRMASTE"ROFSMVIC Nov 1,995
TOO- VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS 70
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE.- APRIL 2,, 1998
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
DRAFT, COOK COUNTY REGULATORY FEMA FLOOD MAPS
lw �w
ilk
I
o
lot
F IT#, rum
A lfwlill ,
Page two I
Draft, Cook County Regulatory FEMA Flood Maps
Proposal for Engineez Services
%WW
April 2, 1998
Attached for your consideration is a proposal from QST Environmental rdthe
engineering services requested by Mayor Farley. QST is a Chicago based consulting firm, who
was just recently retained by the Village of Northfield to conduct a similar review and appeal on
behalf of A of Northfield to FEMA. Their appeal was for the new proposed FEMA
flood plain maps along the Skokie River within the Village of Northfield. QST was successful in
getting FEMA to change the majority of the floodway limits back to their original location.
The scope of services contained in QST's proposal outlines in detail QST's recommended
technical review needed for submitting an appeal of the new proposed flood plain and floodway
maps to FEMA. Both Jeff and I have reviewed OST's scope of services, and concur with their
recommendations. It is however, our recommendation the Village Board consider their proposal
as three separate phases as follows:
Phase I
Perform a technical review of the FEMA hydrologic and hydraulic data used to develop the new
proposed flood maps, assist in development of an IDNR agreement to revert back to the
conveyance floodway definition, and preparation of a formal appeal of the FEMA Draft Flood
Insurance Study and Flood Maps. Total cost of this phase would be $13,225, with a completion
date 8)
of 6-15-98. (FEMA!s current 90 -day appeal deadline is 7-15-9.
Phase 11
Survey home elevations affected by the special flood hazard area and, on behalf of individual.
property owners, submit LOMA applications. If the Village Board agrees with this Phase, I
rFcommend the following conditions:
1. No application should be filed on any property not now in the Special Flood Hazard Area.
2. Applications should be filed now for properties currently located 'in the Special Flood Hazard
Area, which are eligible based upon current and the future Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The
future BFE to be used would be g of either the 1986 flood of record or BFE based
upon the 9-30-97 Draft Insurance Study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
3. Applications could be filed now for properties currently located 'in the special flood hazard
area
,, which are eligible based on the current BFE, but would not be eligible based on the
future BFE. Since the benefits would be of limited duration, perhaps two to three years, this
could be done on a cost -share basis with the property owners.
Page three
Draft, Cook County Regulatory FEMA Flood Maps
Proposal for Engineering Services
April 2, 1998
Phase III
1P
QST would assist the, "Village In CO.., 11, n=caung the progress of their work to Village residents
4,110 .1,
by attenaing a meetmg� sponsored, by the Village to respond to property owner questions and
comments. Cost for this phase is estimated at $2,820 per meeting and is available upon request.
If you concur with this recommendation, I would request it be placed on the Agenda for
consideration by the Village Board at their April 7, 1998meeting .
W,
GRAM
cl Dep Public Works Director Sean P. Dorsey
Village Engineer Jeff' ''`Wu lbecker
Project Engineer Chuck Lindelof
x:\flles\frontoff\eng*mmg\CFEMA.mps
QST Environmental, Inc.
Proposal No. 55-98999,999-064
Evaluation of Draft Cook County Regulatory FEMA. Flood Mapping
ApplicableProspect [ DesPlaines River and MacDonald Creek
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
Ak
004111f
Scope of Services
I Technical Review of FEAM Hydrologic and Hydraulic Data. The ENGINEER shall obtain from the official
FEMA archivist a copy of thehydrologic, and hydraulic models upon which the Draft Flood Insurance Study,
and Draft Flood Insurance Rate Maps are based. The E NGINEER shall meet, with the Village staff,to obtaro
.
and discuss any flood of'record data and shall undertake a thorough site iinspection of the flood prone areas, to
be examine d., The ENGINEER, shall make a compreliensive exami enation of the data sed and the methodology
employed by FEMA and its consultants in determining the Draft Flood Proles for theDesPlat"nes River mid,
McDonald Creek. Based upon the ENGINEER'S review of the FEMA. hydrologic and hydraulic models, the
ENGINEER shall prepate, a, summary, report oflit's findings forthe Village., Where additional surveyed river
'etons appear to, beceded to more accurately defitnethe regulatory floodtea y, the ENGINEER shall
,make such arecommendanon with an est"Imate of the cost associated w"th obtaini*n
gthe additional survey, data
with incorporating the data into the Floodway Hydraulic Analysis and withaddl.119 th,'I",s,"]",,n,fo,,ri-ti,ati*on,, to,'Vjillage
appeal (these costs are not included within the fees listed here). [Estimated Fee., $10,58'0.00 -rhese Servi
Estimated to be Completed by May 31, 1998] 11 wes
2. �4p� 'Of
pealofFEAIM Drafii FloodZnsw-ance SlUdY and,Flood',Mays. Based upon the ENG]NEERS findings,, and i
directed by the Village of Mount prospect to ap
p , peal, the FEMA Draft Flood Insurance Study and Draft,Flood
Insurance Rate Ma s. the ENGINEER shall prepare such an appeal on behalf ofthe'VIllage. This appeal shall
be ofthe fann re ire by FI E MA and shall include, all necessary suppotling technical data.
[Estimated Fee $1,1120,00, These Services Estimated to be Coy feted by June 15'. 1998]
3. Assistance with IDNR Agreement to Revert to a Conveyance Floodway Definition The ENGINEER shall
review the current Village of Mount Prospect Floodplain Ordinance with respect to the requirements of the
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. In particular, the ENGINEER shall recommend those'changes whch
are necessary for the Village to qualify under the IDNR Section 708 rules to have its floodways delineated
6 Illy and not be affected by issues relatitig to floodway storage potential. The
asea u, on, conveysnce ot
,P
ENGINEER shall consult with the Village Attorney on this matter ad coordinate submittal of the'modified
Floodplain Ordinance and Agreement to the Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
[Estimated Fee $1,625.00, These Services Estimated to be Completed by May 15, 1998]
4. Survey Home Elevations Affected by the Special Flood Hazard Area: The ENGINEER shall surve theground
# t y
surface elevations of" all homes, within, the cent and, future flood. prone areAs based, upon the current, and draft
FE#,MA flood, ma,
pping, est""niated to be 230 properties. Thi's work�,, shall beperformed utilizing the FEMA
vertical elevation reference system and shall be accomplished with the ENGINEER'S personnel utilizing its
survey equipment and one Village vehicle. The Village vehicle is to be used to fac*14
my communication to the
local community that the work being performed is that which has been authorized by the Village. FEMA
Elevation Certificates shall be prepared for all homes located within the Special Flood Hazard Area. Where
tecb,nically justified the ENGINEER shall prepare a Letter of Map Ametidnient application on,, behalf oIfthe
property, owners (40 properties estimated to be involved) and submit that application, to FEMA, for approval.
[Estimated Fee $34 ,445.00, These Services Estimated to be Completed by July 1, 1998,]
QST ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
PROPOSAL No. 55-98999.999-054 APRIL 11, 1998
PAGE 1 OF 2
5. Assistance with Communication to Affected Property Owners: The ENGINEER, if requested by the Village,
shall assist the Village staff in periodically communicating the progress of this work to the Village residents
and may be required to attend meetings sponsored by the Village to respond to property owner questions and
%.0 A
comments. The costs associated with this service will depend upon the number of meetings to be attended and
the amount of assistance given to the Village staff in communicating to the Village residents.
[Estimated Fee $2,820.00, These Services Estimated to be Completed by July 15, 1998]
Rate Schedule
Due to the variable nature of the physical environment in which survey data must be gathered, the uncertainty in the
quality of data to be received from FEMA and the uncertainty of completeness of the data to be obtained from
FEMA, the ENGINEER will provide all services on an hourly rate basis plus reimbursable expenses with a
maximum estimated agreed price of $50,590.00. The value of these services will be based upon the following rates
schedule which shall remain in full force and effect until April 1, 1999.
Senior Professional
Project Professional
Staff Professional
Cadd, Drafter
Word Processor
2 Man Survey Crew
$ 105.00 per hour
$ 85.00 per hour
$ 70.00 per hour
$ 55.00 per hour
$ 35.00 per hour
$ 110.00 per hour
All reimbursable expenses such as document reproduction, postage, delivery service, travel, etc. will be billed at the
rate of cost plus 15%.
QST ENviRONMENTAL, INC. APRIL 1, 1998
PROPosAL No. 55-98999.999-054 PAGE 2 OF 2
CD C) C) C) 1 C) C)
0 0 8 8 C) C) Q C�
C; ci 6 6 04 6 0
m CS c; ci C; wi cl U-) kli
T- T- CN 0 0 04 N
Do vm
CC)
LO 04 CD � 64W tip
Cl)
bs
C)0 1 C) C) C)
8 8 cn�
8
lfl(S C:)* R q q
C� 0 C) C; 0 8 8 1 Q
a 44, Go 03� 69 643. to 6 C; (Do
64 CN m
CL 6%
E C
03
z
C� 0 C) C)
I I' C)
C) 0 8 0
C4 (1) T- C3 C7 CJ Ct t 0 0 Cc)
rzi C; z
co
cn
0
C) a 0 0
Ci
C> 0 a 0 0 carl C; c; a Q
c;
MOWN
C)
Co a C:o C>
< 0 Rl 0 R •c) C�
LO 6 C; 10 6 N cNi 40 o
C; 6 CS
1
81 cn� 0
C; C) C)
,.d)C> C� 6 6
2 .1 c Ci
>
C3
cc m
u PL4 a
CD
0 C) C?
a: C7
T 0! :1 C)*Ci 0 p 10 Cl C) cz�
Ri 0 C� 1, 11"
u L6 i : 1 8 10
!C7 C%l
CLT 00tCi C>
C;
4-o
m
91 C:)
0 .— 0 C) 'Cl 0
ta I 1 0 C31 8
8 0 0
9 0 0 a 41
U) V co
V) 0
fL 3
0
12
cc 0
0
0 4z'
+roLo
CIL
0
0
it 0
U co CO
LIE
LLJ 0 p Co
%ft 1 G .— CL Itz
0 to
14S.CL 10 to
ab,
4) 10 co (13
4s; C -L G
u 5 CO LIL C m
Z
it ZZ C: co t4t:- 0
"K %( EE U
•th) en �-c , : 0 tj)
-
Liu Ql to
C:
U3 .0 C:
to
-a co
Q LL
X e! a
Lb % 0
IQ) to
8
C: C -:L L lz
*=
LD CL
Cb 10
to 03 1 t
EL tX "cc
4 N
Nwo
00
.1
0 a
0 C)
a
0
C.-)
8
C8,
8
C;
W)
8 C� O
co CN
W)
(d
c;
c; cs cy
co co
C;
0
co- cli
V-
TZ
C%i
U)
60
toot
4o).
a)
C> C) 0
8 C) Cy
8
CO)
a
C)
W,
0
U3,
C)
co
8
co
0
Grk
C;
61%
I
4)
m CL
VI).
Lo
V)
1
CD
0
C31
C>
CR
0
C>
0
IV-
Ir-
Cq
Ir
Ci
a;
C;
N
R
0
R
CD
R
CD
co
U)
0
C)
C) C) a C)
0 C) q q
0
0
C>
C)
0
Q
Is
C:
10
W V)
2
C:i c; P- OD
LO
0 CD
po
PC a
PC
rm
C)
c)
8
0
in
a
Cl
Ci
V
Ul•
LO
10
WI
co
0
a
cn
so.
W
6%
1
0 0
rA
P61
UCi
m
i »
O
O
0 a
60
4
(n
N ci
00 001
Nco
N
C) C)
0
as
N
o to
ad
u
CSS
1
44
.0 o
w co C)
ui
0 o o
9
a
C)
C)
a
0 0
C)
Q
co
La
'm co
CL
Ci 0 o cs
C;
C6
C6
a
C%
co
Now
.0 ui
C)
0
0
8
C)
C)
C) C)
ow
(D U)
U)
Csi
NN(6
(6
C4
aGr
W
008
0
*(D
CL CO) c'fa
l
0
'o
cz %j 2 . fn
b) a - 4.-.
Z3
Lb p 42
Jt 15. cx
*b
.11. 0-- 2
Lu °cx
U.
a
C)
uj
CL
Cy
LL
0
LLJ it
on 4.
.0
V) e Q� ;R
U)
tz
X
c: 0
ca
o
CL rx
to
ko
TO* Village Manager Michael E. Janonis
FROM: Project Engineer
DATE: April 1 1998
SUBJECT: 1998 Material Testing
On Friday March 27, 1998, Public Works received nine proposals to complete the material testing
for the 1998 Street Resurfacing and Reconstruction Programs. The proposals included:
0 Testing the concrete material for the new curbs and driveways.
Testing the asphalt binder and surface mix material at the asphalt plant and the asphalt placed
on the pavement.
All of the proposals fulfilled the above requirements. The proposals also supplied references of
past work and qualifications of the personnel who will be evaluating the material samples.
Listed below are the vendors with their proposed costs:
----------- Design Consultin En ineers $361420.00-
- ------------ PSI, Inc. $4000500
Appfled GeoScience Inc. $41,055.00
Seeco Consultants, Inc. $44)300.00
Soil and Material Consultants. Inc. $51 270.00
. .... . ........... Material Testing Laboratories $521765.75
1Midwest Engineering Services Inc. $55)155.00
� O'Brien & Associates $57)525.00
Testing Service Corporation $64.155.00
En ineer's F,stiat+ $45,410.00
,__
a
Page 2 1
1998 Material Testin.-
April 1, 1998 i
After reviewing the proposals, Design Consulting Engineers offers the best overall services for
the cost. Design Consulting Engineers has successfully •completed work on many similar •projects
for numerous other municipalities in the area and appears to be well qualified to complete this
required work.
This work will be funded with the budget accounts listed below and as shown on page 300 of the
1998 Budget Book:
Account Code Amount
057706-540545 $531)000.00
•
o, Michalik, Project Engineer
I concur with the above recommendation
pir
len R. Andler Pt 'fic, Works Direct�or
7 1
VIM
XTILESTNIGINEERTESTING\ I 998\MEMO-JAN. DOC
EL
Qf
LJ
E
'6
rl-.
04
V—
ok
C; 8
N
Iloo,
C*4 C*4
C+4
9 s
...........
ca
L
c;
11 t . . ....
..
CL
-
6
N
N
N
M N
W)
C
0
0
...........
ci
. ..........
c
ui
in
ui
N
N m
. ...... . . . .
... ..
Cy
f 9
. ..........
""C?
'C
J'VO
ui
c;
0 co c;
U)
Lf>
c
C41 w
w
W
ca
UJ
0
1
a
tm
Je
0 m
co 0
=
c
-6�
8
C
.. . .... . . .......
. . .....
8
8
8 8
D
L6
ui
ci
0
C)
.
.... . .. .....
Ln
rl-
wy
9'
N
tn
C 0 ai
(D
00 ui
pWw
00
Csi
(D
11—
CM
M 40
00
Chi N
C)
C
('14
Lr)
t
foo
W 1
fl.-
01 00 Go
M
C3
J -
-6
IS
Z
9
Ln
N
C4
co
C)
. .........
. .
0
CO
rm
... . ................
*E-
1 ui
. ..............
ci ci Cd
C
.0
t
CUC
tu LU
Go
iii
0)
U N
U.1
IL
C
0
Z 0 (49
cu
0 Z
CL
Z LU U.1
E
AP
CL
0
c
0
0-o
r z
0
c tv
<
c
ZI
Sc
400- C,
lo z
U. W
0.0
46.0
0
4
C CO
0
tm
r
—
qJ
&-
0
.J 0 LU 0
C
ton
-S
U.1u
< CO
0 0 V —
UJ
c
0
0 so
k000. . ........... . . . .
61
ed
C*
CL "
z UJ W
M
0 .1
U. Z
WrV)
0
��m
V)
CD
cm
Fz
W
ton
011
co
ui
LO
cn
- -- - ------
.. . . . ............ .
D
N
00
C)
Cd
. ........ . ... .
C
..... ...........
ci
IT
00
00
00
. . ........
a
— -----
to
IV
0
ci
...
.... .. ...
.
.. ... .. ..... . .
.
V4
As
�
V
j �..
�,
Lo
'47
Sim
JV'fi
CI
CR I
...............
C Pd .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ..
I
0
ci
C;
kn N
(D
o
0
W
W
C4
E
............ .
fir/
0
06
.................. .
-in7
7 0
. ......... . . . .
— -- - -------
(0
—
CO
— —
�
------------------ - -
- - -
�
------
ui
ui
1: ui
V
C
m
0
IV
Z,
to
S
M
c I. ii
C:L
C
r Z:5
=
T; M c tv
<
C:
cm
c
IL
L- 16 -
CD
v
c
d) 4)
v v
cc
ui zi
u
c
CL IS
to
0
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO
I- VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIB
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 1, 1998
SUBJECT: COMPUTER PURCHASES 1998 - VILLAGE HALUSENIOR CENTER.
PHASE 11
For fiscal year 1998 the Village Board approved the purchase of 44 personal computers so
that the Village inventory would be standardized and the various applications could be
upgraded through the purchase of the new PCs. PCs continue to be purchased in groups
for individual departments or divisions who have completed the necessary user training so
that when the new PCs are put on line the users will be utilizing the applications to the fullest
extent. There are 3 PCs yet to be purchased out the total number authorized.
This purchase request is for the village hall/senior center and will be the first group
purchased. This purchase request is for 10 PCs, so this authorization reflects a portion of
the number approved as part of the 1998 budget. A final purchase request will be submitted
at a later date for the remaining PCs authorized for 1998 for use by the village hall/senior
center users.
The Village Board had provided prior approval for the purchase of PCs during 1998 at the
meeting on November 18, 1997, and the staff was to report Out the quoted prices at the time
each purchase was undertaken. Therefore, I would request authorization from the
Village Board to purchase 10 PCs from Gateway 2000 for an amount not to exceed
$17,150, there are funds available in the 1998 budget for this purchase. The attached
quoted price sheet confirms Gateway continues to provide the lowest priced equipment
which meets our needs.
If you have any questions please contact me.
ax
c: MIS Coordinator Joan Middleton
X:\USERS\DAVES\WIN\OFFICEWIS\VHPCPURI.WPD
ic0
0
CL
x
c
o
r-L
0
r.L
0C7
0
0
ic
ul
(A
CD
CL
0
-1 CD 0
0
Cn --4
C:)
0
0-
cr
co
C) SU
S
r
N
4
..........
COD
0
qA
n"�"a
<
M
U)
m
X
-1 ....................
0
0
X X X
X
0)
(D
U)
X 0
3
X
x G)
cr
CJI
P-0
0
x
-00
--- - - ---------- ----- .... . .
.. . . . ..
....................... . ...........
3
CD
-u
40
%a a
0
,
3
co IX
Xx
x
x XS
X cr
_0
CD
:r
POOL
K
0
N
. .......... . -1 . ..... . . .
.
. . ....................
rot&
--4 X X X
.&
X
w X
X
X
0
U)
X"
0
. . . ......... .. I v ,
.0
a
0
poll
m
G)
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois*
I
101' 1 11�111 iii
TO VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER 96
DATE: APRIL 2, 1998
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF VILLAGE HALL COMPUTER SERVER
At the Committee of the Whole meeting on March 10, 1998, the Village Board authorized
staff to accelerate the purchase of the Village, Hall server to 1998 instead of 2003 due to
the significant limitations of memory and storage space. At the time of the discussion staff
quoted an approximate price of $9000 for the new server based on the most recent
purchase of the GIS and message server. The QIS and message server was configured
for the specific purpose of providing for GIS functions and messaging functions, so it was
not configured to necessarily function as the. main Novell file server (Village Hall/Senior
Center Server).
When the quotes were obtained for the replacement of the Village Hall server, staff was
sensitive to the issues brought up by Village Board members during the meeting. Board
members -suggested staff investigate the possibility of combining server functions from four
servers into fewer servers. Staff obtained two configurations for the Village Hall server;
however, the cost estimates were not in line with the previously estimated cost from staff,
as quoted during the March 10 meeting. A server has 6 bays available for storage space.
In order to ensure proper redundancy one of the bays serves as the redundant drive and
does not contribute to the overall storage space available. Therefore, if only four bays
were utilized for storage (hard drives) the available storage space would be limited to three
bays because of the redundancy. Under this scenario two bays would be open for future
expansion. Unfortunately, if other storage drives are added in the future one of the new
bays would function as the redundant drive for the new storage drive. A server configured
in this manner would allow for four storage drives and two redundant drives. All drives
must be the same size.
Storage drives come in the following sizes: 1) 4.2 GB (gigabytes); 2) 9.1 GB; or 3) 18 GB.
In order to minimize the possibility of growing out of the disk storage space and build a
server which could function in the place of two other servers staff would like to fill all the
available bays with the initial configuration so that only one disk provides the redundancy
function instead of two disks if additional drives are added in the future. I would
recommend a server configured to include storage in all six bays to avoid losing possible
storage space at a future date. A PC configured to possibly function as a file server which
Page 2
April 2,1998
14'eit-orandurn: PURCHASE OF VILLAGE HALL COMPUTER SERVEN!
could eliminate an existing server in the future should have drives sized appropriately. One
option for drive sizes is 6 drives of 4.2 GB or 6 drives of 9.1 GB. The projected cost of the
4.2 GB drives is $8804. The projected cost of the 9.1 GB drives is $12,012.
I would recommend approving the purchase of a server from Gateway 2000 in an
amount not to exceed $12,012. This configured price is for 6 storage drives of 9.1 GB
each. This configuration will allow for i of combining server operations into
jewer servers in the future if necessary without making addonal server'enhancements.
Attached i's a speardsheet listing the prices from other vendors for the desired
configuration.
'.f you have any questions please contact me.
DAVID STF AHL
c: MIS Coordinator Joan Middleton
X:XUSERS\DAVESkVVIN\OFFICE\M[SkVHSERV1.WPD
Vendor Quotes - Village Hall Server
Gateway Ns 8000 300 Compaq Proliant 3000,
ALR Revolution 2XL
11366 NIHz Pentium 11 w/
512K cache, 256M RAM,
1611 monitor, 6 - 4.2Gb hard $8,804 $12,044 $8,965
drives (net storage 21 Gb)p
RAID adapter
300 MHz Pentium 11 w/
512K cache, 512M RAM,
1,511 monitor, 6 - 9.1Gb (net $12,012 $21,526$12,330
1 storage 45.5 Gb, RAID
,.adapter -- ------- - ..... -----------
SVR2.XLS 4/3/98
V'110,96 Of �Maunt Prospect ip011C
Mount Prospect, Illinois z
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TOS MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: FIRE CHIEF
POLICE CHIEF
SU13JECT: VILLAGE BOFPC PROSECUTOR FOR TEE FIRE & POLICE CHIEFS
DATE: FE13RUARY 26., 1998
Over the past several weeks, under the direction of Village Attorney Everette Hill, both of us have
been working with Attorney John H. Kelly on vart,ous administrative/personnell matters pertaming
to cases in front of the BOFPC. These cases havebeen handled both professionally and efficiently'.
with positive outcomes for the administration of both Public Safety Departments.
As you are aware, due to the change of law firins by Mr. FEll we have been looldng for and trying
various attorneys to .find the appropriate person. Based on recentpositive, ongoing, successful
's
expenences and & association with Mr. Kelly, with the concurrence of Village Attorney Everette
we are asking that Mr. John H. Kelley of Ottosen, Sinson, Trevathen, Britz & Dooley, Ltd. be
recommended to the Mayor and Board as our BOFPC Prosecutor.
MTCHAEL F1W
Fire Chief
MF/ R.Pjd
c : Everette Hill