Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0713_001MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FEBRUARY 24, 1987 L ROLL CALL Themeeting was, called to order at, 7,02 pom,*, Present at the meeting were: Mayor Carolyn H. Kraus '4,el 1 Trustees, Ralph Arthur, Gerald Fa,rley, Leo Flo ros, George Van Geem and Theodore Wattenberg, Absent from, the meeting was Trustee Norma Murauskis. Also present at the meeting were: Acting Village Manager Michael Janonis, Planning and Zoning Director Stephen Park, Public Works Director Herbert Weeks, Finance D'irector Davi'd Jepson, Deputy Public Works Director Glen Andler, 1, ##0" 'Vill,age Engineer Chuck, Bencic� Street,, aper Mel Both, Forestry Super in'tendePt Sandra or acs Research Assistant Michael J. Steklac, Public Works Administrative Aide Elizabeth Taska,, Planning and Zoning Secretary Helen Giordano and Ron Norene, of R. V. Norene and Associates. Also present were two persons from the print media. MINUTES The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of February 10, 1987 were accepted and filed. 111, OPENING REMARKS In her openirig remarks, Mayor Krause encouraged the Committee to consider adding anadditio,nal revenue source, for the 1987-1988 fiscal year. She noted that in 1982, she proposed a 1% Restia,urant/Liquor, Tax and that it may be worthwhile to bring up again this year. IVo CITIZENS TO BE HEARD There being no citizens present desiring to be heard on any item that was not on the Agenda, the Committee moved on to the next item of business. V10 1987-1988 BUDGET HEARING 1,qNPLAN NING AND ZONING D,EPARTMENT. Planning and Zoning Director Stephen Park Introduced the 1987-1988, Budget for the Department of Planning and Zoning. The Planning and Zoning Department is s responsible for planning and coordinating the Village's physical development and the administration of the Community Development Block Grant Program. Major projects that are administered by the Department include the Tax Increment Financing Redevelop- ment Program, the Downtown Facade Program, the CDBG Single -Family Residential Rehabilitation Program and the CDBG Multi -Family Rehabilitation Program. Mr. Park noted that with with a Director, one Economic Development Director, two Planners, one full-time and one part-time secretary and seasonal student interns, the Department is smallest Department in terms of personnel, yet they serve more Boards and Commissions than any other Department in the Village, F Trustee Farley asked when it is expected that the Facade Program will decrease or end. Mr. Park responded that he expects the core of the downtown area will have 90% of the buildings 'improved and that there has been increased interest by some businesses on the fringes of the downtown along Northwest Highways He also indicated that other businesses outside the downtown area in Mount Prospect also have indicated an interest and that may be a future policy decision for the Board on whether they wish to consider expanding the ProgramG Trustee Farley asked Mr. Park that if he had to reduce his Budget, where would he make the cuts. Mr. Park stated that the least successful Program currently is the Multi -Family Rehabilitation Program but that is the area where there is the most need. If he had to, he would eliminate the Single -Family Rehabilitation Program because of the limited impact on the community. Trustee Van Geem asked Mr. Park to elaborate on the Capital Expenditure line items listed on page 112 of the Budgets The Capital Expenditures listed on page 112 are all funded by CDBG Funds and are allocated as follows -,P. Account #23-062-07-8951 is the Single -Family Rehabilitation Loan Program; Line item #23-062-08-8951 is for the Downtown Facade Program; line item #23-062-12-8951 is for Multi -Family Rehabilitation and line item #23-062-13-8951 is for Public Right - of -Way Improvements in the Downtown Area. Trustee Wattenberg praised the Planning and Zoning Budget and the reduction in expenditures compared to last year's Budgets Trustee !Toros asked if there were more requests for Facade Program improve --V ments. Mr. Park responded that they can fulfill their present requests but beyond that, they would seek more funding. Mayor Krause spoke about the Village's work in the Boxwood area. She encouraged the Planning and Zoning Department to continue their efforts in the Boxwood area and also to concentrate on the multi -family areas on South Busse Road. She stated that she would like to make this a priority 'Item for the Village. Mr. Park stated that the Federal government has given approval for rehabilitation work in the Maple Crest/Judith Ann and Boxwood areas but that multi -family -rehabilitation was very staff- intensive and that they had limited money to meet their objectives with. Mayor Krause stated that she would like to have the issue of multi -family rehabilitation discussed at a future Committee of the Whole meeting. Trustee Farley added that he would like an inventory of the multi -family buildings in the community. 2. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT* Public Works Director Herbert Weeks 0 � - - - - � He introduced the Public Works Department Budget for the 1987-1988 fiscal year. stated that the Department has added no new programs and will maintain the same level of services as last years He noted that increases are expected in the Solid Waste Contract that will end on July 31, 1987. A 25% increase is expected due to higher tipping fees at area landfills. The Public Works Department is responsible for four major Programs: the repair and maintenance of streets in the Village, the upkeep of trees and other plant life in the Village, the water and sewers for a majority of the community and for the Engineering program of the Villages #M* 2 ow Trustee Farley noted that Public Works is recommending the resurfacing of only four miles of streets this year. He stated that they seemed like a small amount and that perhaps another revenue source may be considered in order to maintain the streets. He asked Mr. Weeks whether we can get by with repaving only four miles of streets this year until new funding is found. Mr. Weeks responded that it was a policy decision for the Board and it would depend on what level of repairs or condition of the streets they wanted. Mr. Weeks stated that he will not do any reconstruction this year because it would cost more than resurfacing existing streets and that it was his desire to do the most improvements with the least amount of resources. ,n,A Mayor Krause noted that the cost of improving one mile of street had increasec, 333% since 1977 and that the cost had risen 41% since last year.. Trustee Floros asked about the provision for $30,000 in overtime in the snow removal budget and that considering this year's mild winter if that figure was excessive. Mr. Weeks responded that the figure should be less this year but he will not know the final figure until winter ends in several months. Trustee Van Geern asked Mr. Weeks whether any new positions were being added by the Public Works Department.. Mr. Weeks responded that he was adding one part-time summer intern in the Forestry Division to work with record keeping and computerization of the Forestry inventory,, Mr Van Geem also asked about computerization of the Department and Mr. Weeks responded that all work was done in-house and that he had not put any money in the Budget for new computers but that -he was asking for additional software. Trustee Farley stated that he gets many questions from residents on the Forestry Division's 'Tree Trimming Program. He stated that he receives frequent complaints and that it was his opinion that tree trimming was depriving many resident's of privacy because of the lower branches being trimmed. Mr. Weeks responded that the Village trims the lower 14 feet of a tree to give clearance for garbage trucks and Public Works vehicles and that it is meets the standards of Arborist Associa- tions., The tree trimming also cuts down wind resistance which minimizes wind damage to the trees. He stated that presently the Village is on a seven to eight year tree trimming cycle and that with this cycle, the trimming is more dramatic than if they go to the proposed five year cycle. Trustee Van Geem stated that one call-in message from a Mount Prospect resident supported the Public Works Department's Tree Trimming Program. The Mayor asked whether the Village had received a 25% adjustment for Lake Water from the City of Chicago. Finance Director David Jepson responded that the Village will receive the adjustment from the City this month. Trustee Wattenberg stated that he was surprised by the increase in street resurfacing costs. The Mayor asked if there were any questions from the audience. ""The following audience members came up to speak on the proposed George/Albert Streets Special Service Area: Charles Houchins, 318 South Albert; Bob Aicher, 213 South George's Clarence Moore, 321 South Albert; Bob Janczak, 214 South Albert; John Sibrava, 219 South George Street and Bob Alexander, Nine South Albert Street. It was noted that on February 20, petitions opposing the formation of the Special Service Area were filed with the Village Clerk. 60% of the property owners and 59% of 1 1 the electors signed the petition opposing the Special Service Area. The opponents of the Project asked the Board to reverse their decision on the Special Service Area according to Illinois State Statute and that they should allocate funds to resurface the streets in their neighborhood. Proponents of the Project stated that they had a. number of people who had originally signed the opposing petition that now wanted to remove their names from the petition. They asked the Board to grant them the full 60 days as required by 16 Illinois State Statute in which to lobby residents who wish to take their name off thepetition. Opponents stated that there was no provision in the Illinois Statute to revoke the signatures on the petition. It was the consensus of the Committee after hearing the residents that the full 60 days should be run before the Village makes a determination on the petition and that we should seek legal opinion on the Statute and perhaps give the petitions and information to the Circuit Court of Cook County for a Declaratory Judgment on the issue. Trustee Floros asked about the Village sump pump disconnection program mandated by the Metropolitan Sanitary District. Deputy Public Works Director Glen Andler stated that the sump pump disconnect program was achieving good results with a large number of residents already complying with the disconnect orders* Trustee Van Geern asked about the $25,000 increase for emergency repairs in the Water Budget. Public Works Director Herbert Weeks stated that if the f unds were not used during the fiscal year, he would like to transfer the money to paint reservoir tanks in the Village. Discussion then turned to the removal of trees at the Senior Center in order to widen the sidewalks in front of the building. Trustee Farley stated that he would not support the removal of the trees. Public Works Director Herbert Weeks stated that the widening of the sidewalks were at the request of the Senior Citizen Advisory Council and that the sidewalk could not be widened without removing the trees. The issue of the tree removal was brought up before the seniors and they agreed to removing the large trees. It was the consensus of the Committee that the Village should ask Human Services Administrator Nancy Morgan to take another look at the problem and go back to the Senior Citizen Advisory Council and ask their opinion. The Mayor stated that she also wants more feedback on the safety reasons for widening the sidewalk. Trustee Floros, asked about the level of funds in the Motor Fuel Tax Budget. Mr. Weeks responded that the level of funds in the account was the lowest the Finance Department feels that the Village should maintain. Trustee Floros also remarked that he was displeased with the current Budget format and that it was difficult for him to find the Budget figures that he needed. *"� 4 **W Trustee Floros asked about the need' f'or resurfacing Evergreen Avenue be Route 83 and Pi'ne Street. Mr. Weeks responded that the curbs in that area are virtuatty non existent and the sidewalks are in disrepair and that they plan to repair these items this year, ,a Trustee Wattenberg asked that the Village prepare an index for the Budget. 3* PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY FINANCING UPDATE. Finance Director David Jepson stated that the V_F11age is plan I ning on structuring a $4 million Bond Issue for the proposed Public Works Facility that will include a level debt service, a maximum 1987 Levy of $210,000 and include a $1 million issue of Citizen Appreci_ ation Bonds. Mr. Dorene, of R. V. Norene and Associates, stated that it was his opinion that there was currently a very good Bond market and that he was ready to move quickly to issue the Bonds after the passage of the Referendum, IF Mayor Krause noted that with the revised figures, that the total interest cost was $700,000 less than originally estimated. She stated that she waspleased with this new information, VI* -MANAGER'S REPORT Due to a family emergency, Mr. Janonis had to leave the meeting early and, therefore, there was no business to be discussed under the Manager's Report, VII. ANY` OTHER BUSINESS The Mayor and Board of Trustees unanimously commended Acting Village Manager Michael Janonis for his work as Acting Village Manager over thepast several months. Trustee Farley reminded residents about the Cable Compliance Hearings on February 25, 19870 Trustee Wattenberg asked Public Works Director Herbert Weeks to have the Police keep him up to date on the ongoing case where the Police Officers were assaulted by two persons. Vill wADJ OURN MENT There being no other business to be discussed before the Committee of the Whole, the meeting was adjourned at 10:06 p.m. MJS/rcw Respectf ully submitted, MICHAEL J. STEKLAC Research Assistant ffm 5 VENTCLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET YEAR NUMBER OF UNITS TYPE PURPOSE 1984/1985 9 Units (9) multi-purpose th vehicles 1985/1985 14 Units(14) markedvl i pce vehicles 1986/1987 No Purchase 1957/1988 15 Units* (14) markedp of ice vehicles 11) crime prevention vehicles tia 1988/1989 9 Units(9) 9} multi- ur w � p p v eht i cl es 1989/1990 14 Units(14) narked p of ice � } 'vehicles 1990/1991 No purchase . o 1991/1992 15 Unfits*p 14 , marked of ice n t } vehicles (1) crime prevention r vehicles w *Crime Prevention veh i cl .e replacement is on a four .year. - cycl e WAMMOM WTI# dIIIL a . ti w i u ViL Schedule 1 COMPARABLE COMMUNITY COMPARISON (1) PER CAPITA EXPENDITURE COMPARISON January 1987 (1) Source - City of Park Ridge (2) Adjusted budget includes total City Budget including MFT, Library, Garbage and excluding Park District, Electric Utility, Sanitary Districts, Community Development Block Grants, Bus Service, Flood Control Proceeds, Cemeteries and Golf Courses* (3) The budget has been increased for these cities for the amount paid by all households for scavenger service. Adjusted Expenditures Rank Municipal,#y Bud et (2) Population Per Caita P 1 Lake Forest $1398099225 15,528 $889o77 2 Oak Park 48,194,444 54,887 878907 3 Naperville 5294620003 679250 780o10 4 Evanston 5599119160 73,706 758.57 5 Winnetka 9,053,978 12,800 707934 6 Arlington Heights (3) 47,692,513 68v840 692*80 7 Niles 199381p134 309363 6336.331 8 Deerfield 10,953,148 17,500 625,989 9 Schaumburg (3) 38,123,488 62,000 614*89 10 Skokie 35,865,360 60,278 595o00 11 Wilmette 159841p510 279500 576o05 12 Des Plaines 32,5479722 569700 574e03 13 Northbrook (3) 1829689213 33p206 571 e23 14 Glenview (3) 19,779,832 35,000 565914 15 Highland Park (3) 17,041,558 30,611 556*71 16 Downers Grove (3) 23,6949428 429691 555o02 17 Park Ridge 209308p865 37,371 543.44 18 Elmhurst 23,237,060 44,276 524,82 19 Mount Prospect 24,229,540 52,634 4610e34 MEAN $2797419852 43p323 $637.24 (1) Source - City of Park Ridge (2) Adjusted budget includes total City Budget including MFT, Library, Garbage and excluding Park District, Electric Utility, Sanitary Districts, Community Development Block Grants, Bus Service, Flood Control Proceeds, Cemeteries and Golf Courses* (3) The budget has been increased for these cities for the amount paid by all households for scavenger service. Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois ..... . .... ''"I'll INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ZOO 10 TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: March 4, 1987 SUBJECT: Bidding Procedures In the 1987-88 proposed budget, funds are allocated for the replacement of the following vehicles: 3 pickup trucks 1 walk-in step van 2 automobiles * Our normal procedure has been to bid this type of equipment in late April. Recommendations for contract award by Board approval would then be in May after the budget had been adopted. Typically, automobile manufacturers give bid assistance to their dealerships for fleet buyers. This year Chevrolet has told their dealers that the cut --o f f date for ordering vehicles on bid assistance is the first week of April. I request permission to bid the vehicles and related equipment this month and submit the results for Board approval no later than April 7, 19870 The bid document will state that we would not accept delivery of any unit prior to May 1, 1987. ierbert Weeks Director Public Works HLW/j NC7TE d►•`�E b�' 'Tt�"� 'r,r�o �Ic.w�r,,,,�.'� �S AA-c'tc..x 9 %-ro c�� �.�.~b �N' '�Uk�N. A'�-��r1ro�.�T"S l..lAa�►�` 4�o'"i'N t4cua �Q A{��T ►� � V � �'r �co Q��..,c.e ��•"- ht� �h� QSt A Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM T0: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works MAR 5 1987 DATE: March 4, 1987 SUBJECT: Additional Unit to Police Squad Car Bid 41 On January 7, 1987 the Police Department received bids on several new squad cars. The lowest bid was from Bigger Chevrolet in Elgin on Chevrolet Caprice sedans. These units are heavy duty construction built to Police specifications. In the 1987-88 proposed budget the Public Works Department has funds a 1 to c at ed f o r reel acem ent o f a 1980 Dodge sedan . Rather than us bid separately, I recommend purchase of an additional vehicle through the Police bid for Public Works use. The low bidder, Bigger Chevrolet, has stated this would be agreeable and would furnish us the vehicle at a cost not to exceed 12,500.00, A Funds for this purchase are on Page 163, Acct .Code 41-072-05-8995 of the proposed 1987-88 budget . Delivery of the vehicle would not before May 1, 1987* Herbert L. Weeks Director Public Works HLW/j 14 Village of M prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois low*, **rop INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Michael E. Janonisq Acting Village Manager FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director COP Y, DATE: January 299 1987 SUBJECT: Comparable Community Expenditures and Revenue Survey s The Finance Depar,tmen�t, of the City of 'P,ark Ridge recently compi eted it fifth 11 F budget expendl*tu,,,res and, selected revenues from nineteen com- annual survey o parable coramuniti'es# The two attac,hed schedules are taken from that survey. Schedule 1 is a comparison of adjusted lbudget expenditures on a per, cap1t basis and Schedule 2 shows payments that a typical family (2.8 persons), makes directly to the municipality. The survey is dated January 1987 and was taken from 1986/87 budget amounts. 4' I n, schi dul,e, 1,t budget amounts bee have n adjusted to represent si'm,'"lar services in ifl'cally enc ,ludes Community Development Block Gr,ant each muni,cipalifty and spec projects and Floo(d, Control, pro,"ects. From: the schedule� it ca,n be seen that Mount i W 0 P�rospect's expenditures per, cap 11"ta, are the lowest of the nineteen co un and "mPately half as much, as, the hi"ghest, community. The $460 per capi"ta, are rail 1,n Mount Prospect are $114 less than Des P''lai,nes, $232 less than, 3,s A,rlington Heights,,t and some $177 less than the average of all, commu,nitie,s. Th* ,is, the fifth consecuti,ve year, -that the Village of Maunt Prospect's per cap,ita, expenditures have been the lowest of the nineteen munilcipai* ,ltie6s, ,surveyed* Schedule 2 shows the annual revenues that each municipality receives directly from a, typical ho�usehold., These direct payments include vehicle and, dog licenses, property, taxes,j water end sewer char,ges, garbage pick, ­up fees k(if separate from property ��taxes) and utility taxes. Mount, Prospect ranks twelfth in the n,1"n,eteen I x 1, communities. It is more dif,fic,ult to compare direct payments than exp per ca,pi,t,a in the sample,, communities because of the influence of uni"que revenue sources such as ales fax Ho,wever,,-the comparison, is worthwhile and shows the typical Mount Pro�spect family,paying, $84 less than the average of all the communities* We all recognize that needs and pr,ior ities.- vary from com,mun"ity to commu.:nlfty. However,, I believe the survey infor,ma,tion demonstrates the con'tinuing commitment toprovide, ne�ces,sary services to the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect at the lowest possible cost. Enc Schedule 1 COMPARABLE COMMUNITY COMPARISON (1) PER CAPITA EXPENDITURE COMPARISON January 1987 (3) The budget has been increased for these cities for the amount paid by all households for scavenger service. Adjusted Expenditures Rank Munici al ity Bud et (2) Pa ulation Per Ca ita 1 Lake Forest $13,8099225 159520 $889.77 2 Oak Park 48,1940444 54,887 878.07 3 Naperville 522462,003 67,250 780.10 4 Evanston 55,911 ,160 73,706 758.57 5 Winnetka 91053,978 12,800 707.34 6 Arlington Heights (3) 479692,513 6B9840 692.80 7 Niles 1993819134 30,363 638.31 8 Deerfield 10,953 ,148 179500 625.59 9 Schaumburg (3) 389123,488 629000 614.89 10 Skokie 3528659360 609278 595.00 11 Wilmette 15 , 841 , 510 27 , 500 576.05 12 Des Plaines 32p547,722 56 , 700 574.03 13 Northbrook (3) 1899689213 339206 571e23 14 Glenview (3) 1997799832 359000 565.14 15 Highland Park (3) 1790419558 309611 556.71 16 Downers Grove (3) 23,6949428 429691 555.02 17 Park Ridge 20 , 308 , 865 37,371 543.44 18 Elmhurst 23,2379060 449276 524,82 19 Mount Prospect 240229,540 529634 460.34 MEAN $279741,852 43 , 323 $637.24 (1) Source - City of Park Ridge (2) Adjusted budget includes total City Budget including MFT, Library, Garbage and excluding Park District, Electric Utility, Sanitary Districts, Community Development Block Grants, Bus Service, Flood Control Proceeds, Cemeteries and Golf Courses. (3) The budget has been increased for these cities for the amount paid by all households for scavenger service. Qi W U Z W S co 0 U H W 41C INC CL z w 00 CD ! C3 Cff Ir•� W J: :► z w +� z U CS 'W a U L"C Z 4 fL ca "2 J ui Ca = ,o4C "' �. CC W 4 } CL W Z CC U U ••j T C d too tri 46 ar C 48 A 0 4 � Q C1 d UJ i. cm CL L. f d 48 d L 1 U !Mr c :�+► ,arm X C� .rrrr .� a CV 0 40 —• i CS 4a As db D. In r*,.. C7 0 CD to i fa i f Q o CyS dTZ d C in .,I .0 C• p C L & C Co L, co U LL .Y C 40 CS A L ...r A 'p 0 CS co C 1 fS a � Irmo d Ci Iwo 0 1Cf go 0 Cri C UL ]► 4J Cr 9- 1J a7 ..r J C3 4 Er E ...o CL M L! R.. la CL. .� � m � 0 m � � :S ,fir C C �- N Cv) V Ln to r*. W cm CJ rr- N V) 'Ll"i to P%• co w �- d C*3 "art' 0 ® CC'S to CU Cn td CS r- M W M M N WOO f� d CtS Cy? CT3 from �1"" CC: Cy7 C�"! + CCy CyS CyS M Ch wr- CS r • • r • r � r • r r r r r r • • d I"+w. C' d N 0 0 f"• N f?i d f"► f'+• hr• fD RC! Y9 �A d cc f'�• rrm- !*] CS M +r fir• 0 Cri d 00 0 0 V V d M 0 w f".► +� L�'y d CV ® 'b` Ll �± M V 0 P+ N M V fir. 0 f►�• r r • • * • r • r • • • • r r +r • • r "� 1""w fiS f'�• W N N i!S N Cr, !�! ® 0 N M W C1S Cn U* w f►,. CS d w m N N M M d flo• M CC? m 03 rr. Cci m N 0 Cy 'fit' 'm N M N M r- M rr- q— arm +rl'r- N p tri d 0 CS d 0 0 w V® W- C5 0 Ca 0 V d tri GM CS Rri W. w 0 o w f.r• Cf! M d CD U a 0 w a f'f'f W 0000 r • 11 r r r • • r r r • r fry d of w w d w 0 C'S d CV Cn CS d f'►+ Cff Cn M U , `!' ,,,q► v Cn Clot Co CO d C* qc Irmo q"' CCa ® CS w CS a! d 0 ® = CIS CS "�!' 0 N i13 "tr v CJ Cry► Cu w Q M CS 0 C3 CS 0 CS CU d V3 r r • • r r • r • r r r r • r r r r w w 0 Q= N a tri V0 CS 0 cz m 0 CU �• Ci C2 0 V- *- CIS W ® 14 � 9- V� d "�C�' Ch CS !�w CS "�# d C!S d hr. C� r- �r- N Ifi rrr- f'�w► U2 f"w• Cd d � C'] C1# +r �r- !L7 d C'!"3 1A CyS � !�"? Cfy s•-' 'b` rlrr- C� • * �r r r r r r r • • • • • r rr r r M ® ra C'� CYS !U Cy'S tri t1'y r- et CU M �' f"� CU CV Cx7 h• C'n h, CV r r V-- rP" Vr Cn CS N C� CIS N Cf C3 CIS d ® O ® CS w m Cp 4 = cu CS CIS Ch CS ® + C� d CS Ca CS 0 N CS d CS 00 0 M r r r • • r I r r r • r • r • • r r • • Cn © tC! N N C! d CS d CJ 0 C� CyD C:S "�" Cn' CtS Cn CS Cff 4' d d CIS co CCS d W co 'b• r VM rr"- VM rr- CS M 0 CIS M Cf Cry d CS Cry d Cf a CS C� 0 CS Q CS 0 CS 0 d CS CS 0 0 CS Cry CS 0 CU � r • • r • • I r r ^r r r r • r • ? I CS v v CS CU m N U3 �- u- wo CS CS CS C7 ® o Cn 0 m 0 Q CS 00 d d CS d 0 co CS CS CS d CS CS Cry d Cn CS d C.'i 00 Cry d d U a +� r 0r • r r • r r • • • r r r r • r r, r o Cry w CS CS d d 0 N 0 m in CS 0 M a CU W 0 +� M # CU CU C*.t C11 CV W +r- C11 CU V- N V- 0- VW WM rv- N d C! CS CS d d ® ® Cn d 0 © CS Cry CIS Cry CS Cn CS b CS CS C'S d 0 00000 00 Cf CS C5 0 CS a 0 U is r a r r r r r r . r r r r r r r Is 0 I M C*7 CU Ctl t'S CU CU W r CV CU r- �- e'- r V� Wo qm- dod A OR Oka •rr« 30 fel 41 400 Lo co .li f fra 0 .r ..r S► sow ii C L .mN t ,C CL .K fS CL A t air CL 4 Sr CL z v 3% C CS 40 z fid E E 9! m � CO CL + x C1 d E D. CD 0 0 0 ,rX to L d f Q o dTZ C in .,I p C L 0 C Co L, ,r LL .Y C 40 CS A L ...r A 'p 0 CS ww■- +V J 0 go UL ]► 4J Cr 9- 1J a7 ..r Ci 4 Er E ...o CL w R.. la CL. .� . w. CL 0 M A � :S CL I C 0 A E it w .Y C .0 eD ICS E X C3 (D co CM ...r C 3C' CL 0 M It E +-+ .C` 41 0 Y 4 Q ...a .rY. u +Q iJ3 d W Cry o :C Q ;,C J CL 7- Z cn m c w :C w dod A OR Oka •rr« 30 fel 41 400 Lo co .li f fra 0 .r ..r S► sow ii C L .mN t ,C CL .K fS CL A t air CL 4 Sr CL z v 3% C CS 40 z fid E E 9! m � CO CL + x