Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/18/2020 VB Agenda6/11/2020 BoardDocs® Pro Tuesday, February 18, 2020 '.!*'.,EGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p,m, Village of Mount Prospect Villa "• - Hall - 3rd floor Board• • !1 S. Emerson Mount Prospect,,60056 Subject 1.1 ROLL CALL Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 1. CALL TO ORDER Access Public Type Procedural Subject 1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Trustee Hoefert Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 1. CALL TO ORDER Access Public Type Procedural Subject 1.3 INVOCATION - Trustee Rogers Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 1. CALL TO ORDER Access Public Type Procedural 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Subject 2.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Village Board - February 4, 2020 https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 1/8 6/11/2020 BoardDocs® Pro Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Access Public Type Action, Minutes Minutes View Minutesfor Feb 4, 2020 - of REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE B Motion & Voting (not specified) Motion by Michael Zadel, second by Paul Hoefert. Final Resolution: Motion Carries Yea: William Grossi, Paul Hoefert, Richard Rogers, Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel 3. MAYOR'S REPORT Subject 3.1 None Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 3. MAYOR'S REPORT Access Public Type Information Alternatives 1. 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation 4. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD S. CONSENT D. Subject 5.1 List of Bills - January 30, 2020 - February 11, 2020 Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 5. CONSENT AGENDA Access Public Type Action (Consent) Recommended Action Approve List of Bills - January 29, 2020 - February 11, 2020 - $7,672,725.18 https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 2/8 6/11/2020 Information Attached is the list of bills for February 11, 2020. Alternatives 1. Approve List of Bills for February 11, 2020. 2. Action at the discretion of the Village Board. BoardDocs® Pro Staff Recommendation Approve List of Bills - January 29, 2020 - February 11, 2020 - $7,672,725.18 File Attachments February 11 List ill . All items under Consent Agenda are considered routine by the Village Board and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of those items unless a Board member or member from the audience so requests, in which the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its sequence on the agenda. Motion & Voting 6m OLD BUSINESS Subject 6.1 None Meeting Feb 181, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 6. OLD BUSINESS Access Public Type Alternatives 1. 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation 7m NEW BUSINESS Subject 7.1 None Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 7. NEW BUSINESS https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 3/8 6/11/2020 Access Public Type Information Alternatives 1. 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation BoardDocs® Pro Subject 8.1 Storm Ready Presentation Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 8. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Access Public Type Discussion, Information Information The Village has recently met the requirements to be awarded a "Storm Ready Community". There are currently, 147 sites in Illinois who have met these requirements. These sites include: 32 Counties; 89 Communities; 19 Universities; 6 Commercial and 36 Supporters. A Storm Ready Community is part of the National Weather Service's Weather -Ready Nation Program. This program assists in preparing our community awareness for extreme weather events ranging from tornadoes to winter storms. The program encourages communities to take a proactive approach in improving local weather notification and to ensure the safety of all our residents, businesses and employees. Part of the requirements include: • Establishing a 24-hour warning point • Having more than one-way to receive severe weather warning and forecasts and to alert the public • Creating a system that monitors weather conditions locally • Promoting the importance of public readiness through community seminars • Developing a formal hazardous weather plan that includes weather spotters and holding emergency exercises Through the work of the Joint Emergency Management System (JEMS) eight communities were all recognized at a meeting in January. A11Fornmtivioc 1. Discuss the Storm Ready program 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation No recommendation required. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... File Attachments Storm _ _ https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 4/8 6/11/2020 BoardDocs® Pro Subject 8.2 Motion to accept proposals for Melas-Meadows Bridge Phase I Engineering Services in an amount not to exceed $124,131.36 Meeting Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 8. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Access Public Type Action Preferred Date Feb 18, 2020 Absolute Date Feb 18, 2020 Fiscal Impact Yes Dollar Amount $124,131.36 Budgeted Yes Budget Source Capital Improvements Fund Recommended Action Accept the proposal from Burns & McDonnell consulting engineers to provide Phase 1 engineering services for the Melas-Meadows Bridge Project in an amount not to exceed $124,131.36. Tnfnrm.=tinn This memorandum transmits a recommendation to award a contract for Melas-Meadows Bridge Phase I engineering services. This matter was initially discussed at the April 3, 2018, Regular Meeting of the Village Board. At that time, no award was approved and staff was directed to solicit financial commitments from referenced stakeholders to participate in funding the proposed work. Subsequently, staff met with executives from Township High School District 214, Mount Prospect School District 57, Mount Prospect Park District, Arlington Heights Park District, and the Village of Arlington Heights. The purpose of the meeting was to entreat the agencies to join the Village in an intergovernmental agreement to develop Phase 1 with an equally distributed financial stake. In turn, the governing board of each agency considered this request. The Mount Prospect Park District indicated it would participate at the requested share if all other agencies agreed to do so. The Village of Arlington Heights indicated that it would not participate at the requested share but might consider a lesser financial contribution. Township High School District 214, Mount Prospect School District 57, and the Arlington Heights Park District all declined to participate. The Village Board contemplated this outcome at the February 11, 2020, Committee of the Whole meeting. This award recommendation is conveyed for reconsideration pursuant to discussion at that meeting. In addition, as explicitly petitioned during discourse at the February 11 COW, staff will apply for an "Invest in Cook" grant to mitigate this proposed expenditure. Background The Village of Mount Prospect's Comprehensive Plan and Bicycle Plan both identify opportunities for better connections between parks, schools, destinations, and neighboring communities for pedestrians and bicyclists. One challenge that has been recognized to promote walking and biking is to provide a safe crossing between Melas Park and Meadows Park. The two parks are divided by Northwest Highway (US Route 14) and the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. A key transportation goal for the Village of Mount Prospect is to construct a pedestrian bridge over the roadway and railroad tracks linking these two parks. A location map depicting the location of this proposed project area is attached. https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 5/8 6/11/2020 BoardDocs® Pro Both parks are unique and draw residents from all areas of town. Melas Park is co-operated by the Mount Prospect Park District and the Arlington Heights Park District. It is owned by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago and leased to the Village of Mount Prospect. Melas Park facilities include a Visual Arts Center, soccer fields, baseball/softball diamonds, dog park, and walking paths. The park also hosts the Village's annual 4th of July festivities. Meadows Park is owned by the Mount Prospect Park District and includes an aquatic center, playground, and baseball/softball diamonds. The proposed pedestrian bridge will be constructed at the northeast corner of Melas Park and the southwest corner of Meadows Park. Approximately 17,000 vehicles travel Northwest Highway and the Union Pacific Railroad handles 70+ freight and commuter trains on a daily basis. The closest pedestrian crossing to the project location is approximately 2/3 of a mile away at Central Road. This limitation discourages residents from biking and walking in the Village. The proposed pedestrian bridge will improve safety for those wanting to visit the parks as well as other local and regional destinations. Video clips captured by the Mount Prospect Police Department depicting these hazards can be viewed at the links below, which show people, likely high school -aged, crossing Northwest Highway and the railroad tracks mid -block: https://drive.google.com/file/d/lOEingtWRhBIVGDmoYwRIZtQ2tX7gXec/view https://drive.google.com/file/d/1J2HoOsYOATRipYebf_YIS4HnZIcKQ13Jview https://drive.google.com/file/d/lrwfw8yXBofbFRhsOryJmIUKPCLDrgubm/view The proposed bridge will also provide a key link to our bikeway system and expand opportunities for alternative modes of transportation in the Village. Construction of a pedestrian bridge at this location will accomplish a key goal of the Village's Strategic Plan. Village staff will follow the formal federal process to complete a Phase I Engineering Study that includes a right-of- way survey, topographic survey, data collection, alternatives analysis, drainage analysis, environmental survey, and lighting review all incorporated into a Project Development Report. Completion of a Phase I Engineering Study approved by IDOT will make the project eligible to apply for state and federal funding for final design engineering (Phase II) and construction (Phase III). The Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Program (CMAQ), Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program (ITEP), Surface Transportation Program (STP), and Invest in Cook Program are some of the programs that provide up to 80% funding (Phase II and III only) to improve transportation systems. The Village has been successful in the past securing federal funding for transportation projects and staff will be prepared to apply for funding when there are future calls for projects. By completing Phase I, the Village will have an understanding of the overall cost, feasibility and challenges associated with the project. These answers are essential to gaining the support of potential partner organizations; they are assured of the Village's desire to move forward with the project, and as a result will better understand the project cost and benefit. The primary focus of the study will be to analyze various bridge designs and solicit input from stakeholders including our residents. A pedestrian bridge is often visually appealing and can serve as a gateway feature for the Village. Challenges include spanning both the railroad tracks and Northwest Highway, and designing ramps on either end that meet handicap accessibility requirements. To ensure a comprehensive study is performed, consideration will also be made for an underpass below the rail and roadway facilities. While an underpass allows for easier access for all users, challenges include potential underground utility conflicts, lighting, and drainage. The chosen consulting firm will assist the Village in determining the optimal design for the project. Village staff is seeking to enter into a contract with a consulting firm for Phase I Engineering services. The study is expected to be completed by the end of 2021 but will include a status presentation to the Village Board of Trustees in early 2021. Funds for this project have been allocated in the 2020 Village Budget. Request for Proposals (RFP). As permitted by the Qualification Based Selection process, the Village solicited a Request for Proposals and Cost Proposal from six (6) engineering consulting firms to provide Phase I Engineering services for the pedestrian connection of Melas and Meadows Parks. Each firm was asked to submit as part of their proposal the following information: 1. Resumes of key personnel and related experience on similar type projects 2. Summary of the firm's approach to the project 3. Staff hour estimate and cost proposal for major phases of work 4. Project schedule https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 6/8 6/11/2020 BoardDocs® Pro The Village received three (3) submissions. The three consulting firms' proposals were reviewed on the basis of their understanding of our goals and their methodology to complete the study. These firms were also interviewed by Village staff. They were then rated (with a maximum score of 100 points) according to these specific categories: background of firm & personnel, related project experience, proposed services, proposed schedule, work effort, and proposal content. The rankings are as follows: Task Burns & McDonnell Benesch Christopher Burke Background 18 18 18 Experience 17 18 17 Scope of Work 23 22 22 Schedule 15 15 15 Work Effort 10 8 7 Proposal Content 10 10 10 Totals. 93 91 89 In addition, each firm was asked to submit a separate cost proposal for the scope of work proposed. A summary of these costs is provided below: Firm Total Costwork Hours Cost/Hour Burns & McDonnell1$285,098 $124,131 907 $118 Benesch $195,411 1260 $130 Christo her Burke p 2108 $ 117 Discussion Burns & McDonnell has put together a very strong project team with extensive experience working on complex Phase I Engineering studies, including bridge and underpass design. Their proposal is thorough and anticipates the many tasks to complete a study that can smoothly move to Phase II Design Engineering. They have a working relationship with Union Pacific Railroad, Metra, the Illinois Commerce Commission, and IDOT as well as the necessary skills to engage key stakeholders and the community throughout the process. Their experience and proposal gives Village staff confidence they can successfully analyze both bridge and underpass structures and guide us in determining the optimal design for the project. It is Village staff's opinion that Burns & McDonnell understands the goals of the study, has provided a thorough proposal based on their extensive experience, and will provide the best product at an appropriate number of hours dedicated to the study. Village staff estimated 1000 hours to complete the study at an approximate cost of $125,000.00 ($125 per hour). Staff has recently been in contact with Burns & McDonnell representatives regarding this project. The firm has verbally indicated they will still honor their 2018 technical and cost proposals for the Phase 1 study. That is, Burns & McDonnell will perform the Melas-Meadows Bridge Phase 1 Study for a cost not to exceed $124,131.36 (no fee increase or scope of work reduction). Alternatives 1. Accept Burns & McDonnell proposal for Melas-Meadows Pedestrian Bridge Phase 1 Engineering Services. 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal from Burns & McDonnell consulting engineers to prove Phase 1 engineering services for the Melas-Meadows Pedestrian Bridge Project in an amount not to exceed $124,131.36. File Attachments MM Bridge Layout.jpg : Melas Meadows Bridge RFP-pdf (510 KB) BurnsMcDonnell revised cost proposal.pdf (48 KB) Motion & Voting https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 7/8 6/11/2020 Subject Meeting Category BoardDocs® Pro 8.3 As submitted Feb 18, 2020 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. 8. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Access Public Type Information -L . 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation 9m ANY OTHER BUSINESS LO, ADJOURNMENT ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR NEEDS SOME I ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 847/392-6000, EXTENSION https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 8/8