The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6. NEW BUSINESS 11/15/05 MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER l>t>. ~ , I J II!!>(O~ FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 11,2005 SUBJECT: PZ-39-05 - VARIATION (EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK) 222 S. EDWARD STREET JOSEPH & AMY BUSH - APPLICANTS The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-39-05, a request to construct an unenclosed porch and entryway in the exterior side yard, as described in detail in the attached staff report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their October 27,2005 meeting. The Subject Property is located at the northwest intersection of Edward Street and Milburn Avenue, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The existing home is currently set back approximately 30' from the front lot line, 4.9' from the interior lot line, 16.98' from the exterior lot line, and approximately 65' from the west (rear) lot line. The Petitioner's proposed improvements to the existing home include a second story addition and an unenclosed porch and entryway to be located within the exterior side yard. A portion of the existing house already encroaches into the required exterior side yard and has a setback of 16.98 feet. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation in order to add onto the house and have a 16-foot setback for the unenclosed porch and a 14-foot setback for an unenclosed entryway. The second story addition meets the required setbacks. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the request at their October meeting. The Commission noted that several homes on comer lots in the vicinity of the Subject Property also encroach into the 20-foot exterior side yard. The Commission reviewed an exhibit that showed the existing exterior side yard setbacks and found that the Petitioner's request was in keeping with several existing setbacks. Many Commissioners commented that the attractiveness of the addition would benefit the neighborhood. Also, the porch and entryway would reduce the mass of the second story addition, which complies with Village Codes, but would adversely impact the neighborhood if the porch was not included. Another Commissioner said that current Zoning Ordinance regulations do not adequately reflect current improvement trends and that the 5 'x8' stoop permitted by code was not the appropriate size for this type of addition. The Commission stated concerns of enclosing the porch at a later date and decided to place the condition of the porch remaining unenclosed as part of their approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve the Variation request to construct an unenclosed porch and entryway and create a 16' and 14' respectively exterior side yard setback, as shown on the Petitioner's site plan, subject to the porch and entryway remaining unenclosed for the residence at 222 S. Edward St., Case No. PZ-39-05. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their November 15, 2005 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. g~7c~y~ MIl\'UTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-39-05 Hearing Date: October 27, 2005 PETITIONERS: Amy and Joseph Bush PUBLICATION DATE: October 12,2005 REQUEST: Variation (Unenclosed porch in exterior side yard) MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Arlene Juracek Joseph Donnelly Marlys Haaland Ronald Roberts Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist MEMBERS ABSENT: Leo Floros STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jill Baty, Planning Intern Judith Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Stacey Dunn, Community Development Secretary INTERESTED PARTIES: Amy & Joseph Bush and Torn Lindsey Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Richard Rogers moved to approve the minutes, as corrected, of the September 22, 2005 meeting and Ronald Roberts seconded the motion. The motion was approved 6-0. Chairperson Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-39-05, a Variation request for an unenclosed porch. She said that the case is Village Board final and the Commission will be making the recommending vote tonight. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, summarized the case. She said that the Subject Property is located at the northwest intersection of Edward Street and Milburn Avenue, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. The Subject Property has a typical rectangular shape, but has a slightly substandard lot width of 49.98 feet when current code requires 50 feet. The existing home is currently set back approximately 30 feet from the front lot line, 4.9 feet from the side lot line, 16.98 feet from the exterior lot line, and approximately 65 feet from the rear lot line. Ms. Connolly said that the Petitioner's exhibits illustrate a significant addition to the eXIstmg house. Improvements include constructing a second story addition and an unenclosed porch in the exterior side yard. A portion of the existing house already encroaches into the required exterior side yard and has a setback of 16.98 feet. This is a 'nonconformity' because current code regulations require a 20-foot setback. Portions of the proposed second story will encroach into the side yards. However, the Zoning Ordinance includes provisions that allow for nonconformities to be expanded in the side and rear yards as long as the addition follows the established setback and the lot is 55 feet or less in width. Therefore, the second story complies with current zoning regulations. Ms. Connolly reported that the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot exterior side yard for new construction and the porch and unenclosed covered entryway would have a 16-foot setback and 14-foot setback respectively. Therefore, the Petitioner is seeking a Variation for this part of the project. The entryway measures 12 feet across Arlene Juracek, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 27, 2005 PZ-39-05 Page 2 and extends 3 feet from the house. It is not a permitted encroachment because the 12-foot linear measurement exceeds the definition of a stoop, which is limited to 5 feet x 8 feet. Ms. Connolly stated that the existing home does not comply with the Village's zoning regulations because the house encroaches into the required exterior side yard. However, the existing structure is a legal nonconformity and is allowed to remain in its current locations. The proposed unenclosed porch and entryway require relief from the RA District's bulk regulations for the exterior side yard setback. The project would be constructed according to all applicable Village Codes. Ms. Connolly summarized the standards for a Variation listed in the Zoning Ordinance. She said that the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot exterior side yard for the house. However, the existing structure does not meet this requirement and the Petitioner would like to construct an unenclosed porch and an unenclosed entryway in the required setback, creating a 16-foot setback and a 14-foot setback respectively. Staff conducted a site inspection and found that several homes on comer lots in the vicinity of the Subject Property also encroach into the 20-foot exterior side yard. Using internal Village software, Staff found measured the existing setbacks and found that the Petitioner's request was in keeping with several existing setbacks. Ms. Connolly said the Petitioner is proposing to expand the existing home to create additional living space. The Petitioner explored different designs for the addition, but determined that an unenclosed porch is integral to the design and objective of unifying the addition and the existing house. However, there are challenges when a majority of the house is currently at the required 20-foot exterior setback and a portion of the house already encroaches into the exterior side yard. Ms. Connolly reported that the Petitioner evaluated the possibility of modifying the portion of the house that already encroaches into the exterior side yard, but determined it was cost prohibitive. In addition, the proposed unenclosed entryway that ties the proposed 'two porches' together is necessary for a cohesive design. The unenclosed entryway's measurements, projecting 3 feet from the building and 12 linear feet across are necessary to comply with Building Code regulations and to balance aesthetics as it mirrors the size of the existing encroachment. However, it is this part of the project that triggers Village Board approval because this structure will encroach more than 25% into the required exterior side yard, resulting in a 14-foot exterior side yard. Ms. Connolly stated that, while the proposed encroachment is comparable to the existing 16.98 foot exterior side yard and other setbacks currently found in the neighborhood, the request fails to meet the standards for a Variation because there is no hardship as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. She said that this comer lot is typical in shape of most lots in the Village and the substandard lot width is less than one inch than the current minimum lot width requirement. Ms. Connolly said that although the Petitioner's request to have an unenclosed porch and entryway encroach into the exterior side yard may be an attractive enhancement to the house that has a minimal impact on the neighborhood, the request does not meet the Variation standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on this, Staff recommends that the P&Z deny the motion to approve a Variation to allow a 14-foot to 16-foot exterior side yard as shown on the Petitioner's site plan for the residence at 222 S. Edward Street, Case No. PZ-39-05. She said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case because the amount of the Variation exceeds 25% of the Zoning Ordinance requirement. Chairperson Juracek asked for clarification on the request: She said that the proposed porch in the exterior side yard, resulting in a 16- foot setback, requires Variation approval as well as the entryway that encroaches in the side yard, creating a 14-foot setback requires Variation approval. Ms. Connolly verified this was correct. Joseph Donnelly inquired why this case did not meet the Conditional Use criteria and needed a Variation. Ms. Connolly clarified that the proposed entry way is actually in the exterior side yard of the property and the Conditional Use is only applicable to porches in the front yard. Arlene Juracek, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 27,2005 PZ-39-05 Page 3 Richard Rogers asked whether the new garage met the 20-foot setback. Ms. Connolly said that the permit was approved with a 20-foot setback, but didn't know whether a final inspection had been done. Mr. Rogers then asked for clarification that if the proposed entry way was located in the front yard, a 30-foot set back would be required versus the 20-foot set back required for the external side yard. Ms. Connolly said that was correct. Tom Lindsay of Lindsay Associates Architects, 1155 Waukegan Road, Glenview IL and Petitioners Amy and Joseph Bush, 222 S. Edward were sworn in. Mr. Lindsay introduced the Property Owners, Amy and Joseph Bush. He said that Joseph Bush is acting as the contractor for the project and will be living in this home with his family when it is complete. Mr. Lindsay said that the Staff presentation was very thorough and that it described the request very well. He added that the request has not only aesthetic purpose, but serves as an asset to the neighborhood. He said he would answer questions from the Commissioners. Chairperson Juracek questioned the drawing of two porches extending beyond the front wall of the house. She asked if this required a separate Variation, or if this request is a Variation for both setbacks. Ms. Connolly indicated that this request is for a 14-foot and 16-foot setback as shown the Petitioner's site plan. If the request does get approved, Staff wanted to ensure the entire porch could not be built with a 14-foot setback. Therefore, the request was broken down to separate the porch from the entryway. Richard Rogers asked if this plan, as drawn, is actually three porches. Mr. Lindsay verified that there are three areas of porch that will be tied together under one roof. Mr. Rogers noted that the aesthetics of the plan are a great improvement to the property. Chairperson Juracek asked if consideration had been given to putting the front door in a different place so the porch may be fully accessed by one means of entry. Mr. Lindsay indicated that the location of the front door, as drawn, is the ideal placement for the entry. Keith Youngquist asked whether the porch could be enclosed later on if the Variation request was granted. Ms. Connolly replied that the Variation can be approved with the condition that the porch remains unenclosed. Mr. Lindsay said that the Petitioners have no intention of enclosing or screening in the porch. Mr. Lindsay summarized that the proposed architecture of the porch offers value to the property and the neighborhood. Chairperson Juracek added that the porch will preserve the character of the house and benefit the neighborhood. Richard Rogers again asked the Property Owner to confirm exterior side yard of the new garage. Mr. Bush said that the garage does meet the 20-foot set back requirement. Chairperson Juracek asked if there were any further questions. Hearing none, the hearing was closed at 7:55 pm. Joseph Donnelly made a motion to approve the proposed unenclosed porch in the side yard as submitted by the Petitioner for the residence at 222 S. Edward Street, Case No. PZ-39-05 with the condition that the porch remains unenclosed. Richard Rogers seconded the motion. Arlene Juracek, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 27, 2005 PZ-39-05 Page 4 UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Donnelly, Haaland, Roberts, Rogers, Youngquist, and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 6-0. Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn at 8:04 pm, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 200S\Minutcs\PZ-39-05 222 S. Edward.doc Stacey Du , Community Development Secretary Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 39-05 LOCATION: PETITIONERS: OWNERS: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 222 S. Edward Street Amy and Joseph Bush Amy and Joseph Bush 08-12-217-024-0000 0.18 acres (7,997.7 square feet) RA Single Family Residence Single Family Residential Variation (Exterior Side Yard Setback) 101 100 103 ]02 ]05 104 1U7 106 109 IU8 111 1I0 1I3 112 115 1I4 1I7 IT6 119 118 :> N :> :> '" '" 1n1 "In 203 202 205 204 207 206 209 208 211 2]0 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 LOCA TION MAP Busse Avenue 101 100 103 102 105 104 107 1U6 109 108 III 110 113 I12 115 I14 I17 - I19 118 123 N :> ... Ever 201 203 205 207 t: 209 ~ 2I1 r;j 213 '" 215 "S 217 j I 221 223 Milburn Avenue reen Avenue 200 202 204 206 208 210 212 214 216 301 300 303 302 305 304 307 306 309 308 311 310 "~"."';""'.""".,.,~,="=".~"",;,",=.",,,,.,,,,,,,,~.=,,~,,,._~~.~~---~---~='~-,"""="""'"',~~.'~~-"~--'-----_.'-'-'---.--- 100 103 102 105 104 107 106 109 108 III I10 I13 115 I14 117 116 119 118 120 121 122 201 200 203 202 205 204 207 206 209 208 211 210 213 212 215 214 217 216 219 218 221 220 223 222 301 300 303 302 305 304 307 306 31/9 308 311 310 II/I 11/1/ ]02 105 104 106 ]1/9 ]08 111 110 liS I14 117 116 119 121 I18 :> '" 204 2116 208 212 214 216 220 301 300 303 302 305 304 31/7 306 309 308 311 310 MEMORANDUM Village of MOUIIt Prospect Conlmunity Development Department TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENEJURACEK,CHA~ERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 20, 2005 HEARING DA TE: OCTOBER 27,2005 SUBJECT: PZ-39-05 - VARIATION (SIDE YARD) 222 S. EDWARD STREET (BUSH RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the October 27,2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Amy and Joseph Bush (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 222 S. Edward Street (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow an unenclosed porch to encroach into the required exterior side yard when the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 20 feet. It should be noted that a Variation is needed since Conditional Use requests are only possible for unenclosed porches that encroach into the required front yard. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the October 12,2005 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250- feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located at the northwest intersection of Edward Street and Milburn Avenue, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. The Subject Property has a typical rectangular shape, but has a slightly substandard lot width of 49.98' when current code requires 50'. The existing home is currently set back approximately 30' from the east (front) lot line, 4.9' from the north (interior) lot line, 16.98' from the south (exterior) lot line, and approximately 65' from the west (rear) lot line. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The attached exhibits illustrate the Petitioner's proposed improvements to the existing home, which include a second story addition and an unenclosed porch located within the exterior side yard. A portion of the existing house encroaches into the required exterior side yard and has a setback of 16.98 feet. However, the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot exterior side yard; therefore the Petitioner is seeking a Variation in order to add onto the house and have a 16-foot setback for the unenclosed porch and a 14-foot setback for an unenclosed entryway. The entryway measures 12-feet across and extends 3-feet from the house. It is not a permitted encroachment because the 12-foot linear measurement exceeds the definition of a stoop; a stoop is limited to 5' x 8'. Portions of the proposed second story will encroach into the side yards. However, Sec. 14.202.B allows for the expansion of nonconforming structures in the rear and side yards, following the established setback, for lots fifty five feet (55') or less in width. Therefore, the remainder of the addition complies with current zoning regulations. PZ-39-05 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting October 27, 2005 Page 3 GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The existing home does not comply with the Village's zoning regulations because the house encroaches into the required exterior side yard. However, the existing structure is a legal nonconformity and is allowed to remain in its current locations. The proposed unenclosed porch and entryway require relief from the RA District's bulk regulations for the exterior side yard setback. The project would be constructed according to all applicable Village Codes. The following table compares the Petitioner's proposal to the RA Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. RA Single Family District Existing Proposed Minimum Reauirements SETBACKS: Front 30' 32.92' No change Interior 5' 4.9' No change 20.98' (house) Porch: 16' Exterior 20' 16.98'(portion of house) Entryway: 14' Rear 25' 65' No change LOT COVERAGE 50% Maximum 32% 39% VARIA TION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: . A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; . Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and . Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot exterior side yard for the house. However, the existing structure does not meet this requirement and the Petitioner would like to construct an unenclosed porch and an unenclosed entryway in the required setback, creating a l6-foot setback and a 14-foot setback respectively. Staff conducted a site inspection and found that several homes on comer lots in the vicinity of the Subject Property also encroach into the 20-foot exterior side yard. Using PVWeb, internal Village software, Staff found that the Petitioner's request was in keeping with several existing setbacks (see attached exhibit). The Petitioner is proposing to expand the existing home to create additional living space. The Petitioner has explored different designs for the addition, and feels an unenclosed porch is integral to the design and objective of unifying the addition and the existing house. However, there are challenges when a majority of the house is currently at the required 20-foot exterior setback and a portion of the house already encroaches into the exterior side yard. The Petitioner evaluated the possibility of modifying the portion of the house that already encroaches into the exterior side yard, but determined it was cost prohibitive. In addition, the proposed unenclosed entryway that ties PZ-39-05 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting October 27, 2005 Page 4 the proposed 'two porches' together is necessary for a cohesive design. The unenclosed entryway's measurements, projecting 3-feet from the building and 12 linear feet across are necessary to comply with Building Code regulations and to balance aesthetics as it mirrors the size of the existing encroachment. However, it is this part of the project that triggers Village Board approval because this structure will encroach more than 25% into the required exterior side yard, resulting in a 14-foot exterior side yard. While the proposed encroachment is comparable to the existing 16.98-foot exterior side yard and other setbacks currently found in the neighborhood, the request fails to meet the standards for a Variation because there is no hardship as defined by the Zoning Ordinance: the comer lot is typical in shape of most lots in the Village and the substandard lot width is less than one inch than the current minimum lot width requirement. RECOMMENDATION Although the Petitioner's request to have an unenclosed porch and entryway encroach into the exterior side yard may be an attractive enhancement to the house that has a minimal impact on the neighborhood, the request does not meet the Variation standards contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Also, the Subject Property is typical of most comer lots in the Village. Based on this analysis, Staff finds that the request does not meet the Variation standards contained in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance and recommends that the P&Z deny the following motion: "To approve a Variation to allow a 14' to 16'exterior side yard as shown on the Petitioner's site plan for the residence at 222 S. Edward Street, Case No. PZ-39-05." The Village Board's decision is final for this case because the amount of the Variation exceeds 25% of the Zoning Ordinance requirement. I concur: ~:b J~on~Lector of Connnunity Development Ijmc H:\PLA"''\PI.lIl1ling & ZOlling COMM\P&Z 2005\SlofTMcmo\PZ-39.05 MEMO (222 S. Edward. side )'ud variation porch).doc .........~.._.. .......... .... -........ ..........-~--.... Exterior Yard msmts Print .. . .. . - . . . IIJII . - II .. --. . . . . . - CJl . m . . r- .. 0 - :: ~ . . - ::0 . 0 - ~ . CJl -I .. .- .. L -.. . III .. . III .- . . , . (;) m -j. -1:.:1 0 :0 ?) (;) m en -I ~- "'- :~~,_.,G6pyr~ht (c) V~llag'a of~. Prosp9ct, IL ~ 0 202ft C:los~ . l' ~ :).... -...;...... L .. . .. .. DISCLAIMER This GIS data is provided '85 is' without warranty or any representation of accuracy, lilneliness or compleleness The burden for determining ;?Iccuracy. completeness. tImeliness, lTlerc:hanwbillty and fltrlHSS for or tho appropriiJtCrlCSS for use rests solely on the requester. Prillted: 10/14;2005 10,0619 AM http://gis/pvweb2/print.do?title=Exterior+ Y ard+msmts&paper=letter&orientation=portrai... 10/1412005 l:l F1 l:I:.~ I ~ S ""Q' ~~ I ,.,... :; ~;z: ;;;:JO 00 - b -< ~/!) L/{ )r Yj'/,::- J '\ / \ \ ( <t-/Y/ i k,/-./,/ f' fc-/j \::X 10/7/Oj / \ Code Section(s) forwhicb Vrrriation(s) is (are) Requested / //1/1 ~_. D I / - / VL/ ..::J ~ .c::;Jo .I ::li I Summary and Justification for Requested Variation(s), Relate Justi:ficati .t) to the Attached Standards for Variations Owners are adding a second floor addition over an existing 1-story ranch and request a variance to construct and open 1-story porch along most of the South elevation. The South side is the current and proposed "Front" elevation but the East side is considered the front by the zoning code. The zoning code permits a 5,0' porch encroachment in the front elevation, Owners seek to construct the porch with a 6.0' encroachment for a small portion and a 4.0' encroachment for most of the porch. This 6.0' encroachment is required in order to comply with the building code which requires a 3.0' stoop for safety reasons. If only a 5.0' stoop encroachment is granted, the stoop will not comply with the building code. The foyer of the house is an existing non-conforming condition. Our request for a variance is due to an existing condition, not a new construction. In order to enter the house, by code a 3. O' stoop is required. Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans IlJld other materi11l~ h,l.Ve been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning DivisiOn. It is strongly suggested that the petitiollCf schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner oftheprope;ty gran.t employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission 10 enler on the property during reasonable hours for visual i.nspection oftbe subject property, I hereby 8ffitm that all :in:tO:rrn.ation provided herein and iD alJ rtHlter111ls submitted in association >vith this application are tme and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Applic!'ut (lrn~ 1\ ~ush D6.tc q L~~ \(6" If applicant is not property o\'.'11er: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agentior the purpose of seeking tbe Variation(s) described ill this application und the associated supporting material. Property Owner {JJnL.\ ~l.\S\l I 1- q \ rlJ ~ Date Mounl Prospect Department (If Community Development 50 Soutb Emerson Sll-eet, M')unl Prospect minois, 60056 Hl-f15-Q5 Phone 8478 J 8.5328 Fax 847818.5329 TDD 847392.6064 3 15:194 RECEIVED FROM:847 724 79919 P.f5l2 LINnSA y ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS 1155 WA.UKEGAN ROAD GLENVIEW, ILLINOIS 60025 847 .724.8777 FAX: 847.724.7990 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: 10.05.05 TO: Judy Connelly FAX NO.: 847.818-5329 PROJECT: 222 S. Edward NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED INCLUDING THIS SHEET: 2 TRANS MITT AL: Judy - 1 also attempted to shrink the front stoop in to 8.0', but it does not work with the roof lif1es of the other porch roofs. Let me know if there is anything else you need. Thanks for all your help. - Liz SENT BY: Liz Demler If you do not receive the complete transmission please call 847.72.4.8777 19-95-95 15:G4 RECEIVED FROM:847 724 799G P.IH VILLAGE OF M,-"UNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Variation Request The Planning & Zoning Commission has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and those variation requests that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's Zoning Ordinance. PETITION FOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW Village Board Final z o ~ o ~ >>il ~ 00 z o ~, 0_ ~] ~~ 0' =: ~ u ~ z s. .i~.cB' .... .:=. .. '0.' "" .. .f;. ..~.. . ~.e. .~.e' . !;oil. ...... .~... Common Address(es) (Street Number, Street) 2.2..2. Tax I..D. Number or County Assred Pin Number(s) t:?~ - \'2-- 2..1 - Oz...vt .. ~~ Legal Description (attach additional sheets ifnecessary) '-OT 12- \"-1 2-",-Ol:'~ l~ l"l ~lA~~\~ ~~ ~DiTiO"--l ~ hC)l..-f~'- F~,p;=-c:::r i~ Tl--1~ ~~ t/z q- ~~"I '2.'J 17JL.O~',p y, ~~J ~~'G- II) ~~T c?f ~ 1"v1ieD Fe.il\JC-t'~l Name Telephone (day) ~ Corporatio Street Address Fax Z Name 0 ~ Eo-< ~I o ~ ~6 ~i Street Address o ..... d ~p., ",' City ~ U ~ -t Developer Name Address Telephon y) Ii) 1.- -r2. Li - t:~ i-~' \ l <) Telephone (evening) 2YI - "l'].J-- ~S llo Fax: " <' .J... \,-,,\ State Zip Code \~ WD06lo Pttger Ul \ ~ [Joe) BL\/- (oR2-0t006 Telephone (day) Fax Attorney Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Surveyor Z Name Telephone (day) 0 I ~ Eo-< '" Address Fax ~1 O~ ~~ ~1 Engineer Name Telephone (day) o g. ~~ ~ [) Address Fax uO -<I =:I Architect Name TZ>M ,_iN r--.<::...,," Address t 1.E;.5 LAJ,bU ~ c-l"" ~ t;U::) G~~\)tEJ,D) '(- b{)t)25 Telephone (day): 847,.. 7Z-Lf-'B 777 Fax 9-,47 - 72-4 -71'U) Landscape Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax 2 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 ~ ~ ~~ O~ ~>:;l ~O' ~; >:;lO 00"""' ~ u -< Code Section(s) for which VariatJon(s) is (are) Requested II.;. 100..:5: 23/ b...i1 I . ~"'~. ~. >. e:. Summary and Justification for Requested Variation(s), Relate Justificati n to the Attached Standards for Variations Owners are adding a second floor addition over an existing 1-story ranch and request a variance to construct and open 1-story porch along most of the South elevation. The South side is the current and proposed "Front" elevation but the East side is considered the front by the zoning code. The zoning code permits a 5.0' encroachment in the front elevation. Owners seek to construct the porch with a 6.0' encroachment for a small portion and a 4.0' encroachment for most of the porch. Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Applicant _GJ"nL\ ~~ Date q\~I\~ I If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the V ariation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner GJ~4 '6us\1 q \ ;=i'-1 \ OS' \ Date Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect 1l1inois, 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 3 Affidavit of Ownership COUNTY OF COOK ) ) ST ATE OF ILLINOIS ) I, ,j()8:c,~\ Bus'n Cl~~~ 4- the sole an an authorized officer of the ~ '2:Jus'rl , under oath, state that I am ) ) owner of the property ) commonly described as ddc) :s Cdu.Xu-& S-r-. ~t. -:Vn:o~c+ It...- l.t,~lo and that such property is owned by \..Jcf,f ph T btJsh (1 n r1 A-m~ N 'Bu. s ~ as of this date. ~]~/ dfn4fJ&MiJ $gnature Subscribed and sworn to before 2 S(~l me this day of 6~,20~ 4 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development . 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 5812 W. HIGGINS AVENUE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60630 ~ NORTH IVIM SURVEYING CO., INC. PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM NO.184-003233 PLAT OF SURVEY OF PHONE: (773) 282-5900 FAX: (773) 282-9424 LOT 12 IN BLOCK 18 IN BUSSE'S EASTERN ADDITION TO MOUNT PROSPECT IN THE EAST ~ OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH. RANGE Il. EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. LAND AREA: 7.998 SQ.FT. I.P. FOUND AT PROPERTY CORNER.... .,,-SW CORNER OF FENCE IS O.Ol'N &: 0.20'[ 160.00 Rec. 160.02 M. SOUTH FACE OF FENCE 1$ O.61'N m .. '\ .... NE CORNER OF FENCE IS 0.20'S &: O.10'W u;:E I) ":00 80\ 00; 1I")<:::t LOT 12 ". .... SE CORNER OF FENCE IS 1.17'N & 0.12'W CROSS CUT 2.00'S & ON I/. 00. ORDER NO. 67396 SCALE: 1 INCH= 16 F'lELOWORK CCJ.4PLET1ON DATE JUNE 15, 2005 ORDERED BY: DAVIS & ClCHORSKI FEET 160.02 M. 160.00 Rec. E. MILBURN AVE. B/C IS 20.35'S LEGEND - WOOD FENCE I ~ - CONCRETE PA\iE~ENT B/C - BACK OF CURB E.C. - EOOE OF CONCRETE I!. - PROPERTY LINE I.P. - IRON PIPE THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONFORMS TO TH( CURRENT ILLINOIS 1.41NtWM 51 ANQAROS FOR A BOUNDARY SVRVEY. FOR BUILDING LINES, EASEMENTS AND OTHER RE~TRICTIONS NOT SHOYiN HEREON. REFER TO YOUR DEED. T I fLE POL I CY AND LOCAL ZON I He ORDINANCE. ETC. LECAL DESCRIPTION NOTED ON THIS PL.AT WAS PFlOVIO.ED BY THE CLIENT AND MUST BE COt.lPA,RED WITH DEED AND/OR TITLE POLICY. o I MENS IONS ARE SHOWN IN ~EET AND DECIP.lAL P,\RTS THEREO~. :il .. E.C. IS 1.28'E", ~ u I) 00": 0\0 .0 0\0 <:::t' II") w il ii <Il ~ .. f-; r./J 6.... .<oj 0'" ~ ~ ~ o ~ r./J i' CROSS OUT 2.00'E & 2.oo.S...... \\\\\\1\11"." "" ~\.. LAN "" " ,'\jV:- ...... D s " :' C;;....JOHN R....~ "-:, :. tt! l KENNEDY ...1<- s :: ~: 035-003595: 2, ~ ~C>-\, CHIC~GO };:O:; ':." u";'.ILLlNOIS/c') f '" '1;..........~~()- -,- "",f OF \\..\.\"" "Iltl\\\\\\ WE, M M SURVEYING CO.. INC.. DO HEREBY CERT I FY THAT WE HAVE SURVEYED THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY AND THAT THE PLAT HEREON DRAWN IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF SAID SURVEY. SIGNATURE: /.d~/'..Kj. ~AI JUNE 23. 2005 DATE: l I C . EXP. NOVEMBER 30. 2006 I I I ~ ! ffi ~ "l ~ i l I SECOND STORY BUILT OVER EXISTlNCi ENCROACHINCi 10.03') FIRST FLOOR (SECTION 11.102B OF CODE) NEW CHIMNEY r------ I. 0.02 NEW CONC. PATIO . STEP NEW FRAME GARAGE NEW 2ND STORY ADDITION No. 222 .............. NEil ASPHALT DRIVEUlA Y ~NEIll CONC. i!! ;IIlALK 0 ; " : ~ SECOND STORY BUILT OVER EXISTlNCi ENCROACHINCi (2."") FIRST FLOOR (SECTION 11.1026 OF CODa E. I1ILBURN A VENUE ;~~~ I~;'~~O' E9 NOTE: SEE ENCiINEERINCiI NOR T H SITE-CiRADINCi PLAN FOR UTILITY LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 12 IN BLOCK 18 IN BUSSE'S EASTERN ADDITION TO MOUNT PROSPECT IN THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 11 NORTH. RANCiE II. EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ~ ~I & 8 iiD ll! ~ la ~I ~IS& ~~ ] il9 I: t-: U) 52 ~ Qlw == Llj u .. fro: :z: a ti -~ W Q! W () <~ -3en (]')oo W WQ! Q! . ~ en~ ::t:NZ C/)N::J :::JNO dl r SITE f'I.AH ,..----------, I I :BREAKFASr : AREA: : 1010 X 13(4 I I I I I I I I I I ----------- ----, I I I I FAMILY ROOM! 2171 X 14/4 : r--------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I .---------- r--------=--1 KITCHEN IBIO X 10/3 20.0' EXTERIOR SIDE SETaACK LINE PROPOSED PORCH TO EXTEND 5..0' FROM FACADE OF HOUSE FIRS T FLOOR PLAN EXTERIOR SIDE PROPERTY LINE u= II II II II FOYER BEDROOM 5 EXIS TING DINING ROOM 19/1 X 13/2 EXISTING PORTION OF HOUSE NON- CONFORMING WITH EXTERIOR SIDE SETBACK ~ ~I & ~ &iB t! ~ !I~ ~ ~ ~ IIi" ~~ ~ .. -~ .9 ~ !~ W = u . zor- Wat:frl 0<0... -:::ten (J')Oo WWat: Ol . 0... enr- :J:<"'4% (J')<"'4:::J :::::J<"'4("'\. !C . fIRST f\.OOR f'lNI MASTER BEDROOM 15/0 X 2//2 - -- /0 I I I SECOND FLOOR PLAN EXTERIOR SIDE PROPERTY LINE r-, l_J BEDROOM 3 14/2 X 11/0 DH BEDROOM 4 A/, X 11/9 BEDROOM 2 9/2 X 11/10 '/0 X 1/10 BUSH RESIDENCE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL NEW SECOND FLOOR BUlL T OVER EXISTING NON-CONFORMING FIRST FLOOR (CODE SECTION '-4.4026) ~ ~I a o 8m 2 ~ !! Ea ~ III ~~ ~ ~~ E~ W == U . 2:0..... WfX~ O'<IL. -=tn U')co WWfX Ql '0... en..... :J:NZ U')N::s ~Na CO . 5fCONO flOOR PlAN Ern NEW SECOND FLOOR CONFORMING WITH EXTERIOR SIDE SETBACK SECOND FLOOR BUILT OVER EXISTING NON- CONFORMING FIRST FLOOR (SECTION 11.1026 OF CODE> ~IIITBD ~II~ D DDD ~I~ ~II~ SOUTH ELEVATION BUSH RESIDENCE MOUNT PROSPECT. IL ~ =! I ~ ~~ E~ ?< III ~~ ~ ~I!.! W ::::! U . :Zo"" WQl~ O<(L -3en (/)00 WWQl Ol .(L d').... :rNZ (/)N:::I ::JNO a:l r 50UTIl B.EV/il1Oll OIII.-tl/. rl.tB) n.t Ul.8-nI. Uta) gaooe 110mB 'UJAaJD QYCIIHYfDOYl9m ~ ~VI:JOSSV !YmNI'J " 'l::>3dSO~d lNn(,.. a~Vma3 'S ttr; 3:>N3aIS3~ HSnS 3NI1 ..u~3dO~d ----- ---- 0:1::0 01-0 l-Q!zO! :t:1L.-<( u-w).- O!OO OO<W a...uiUO O::t:~cn WU O! cn<(...:)O OO~Q! a...O!Ow OU:::!I- O!z:::JX a...Wa:Jw 3NI1 )t:)V913S 30lS ~01~31NI ,O'S /(EEEEI/ ' , I , IEEEEII ' 3NI1 )t:)V913S 30lS ~OJ~31X3 ,0' OZ; ::t: U 01: o Il.. o I- o o ~ ::t: U O! o Il. o I- o q .::::! 3NI1 ^1~3dO~d :t:00 UI-a! O!Z<( 0-).- Il.~. wwl- -'rZ a:J::t:0 <(UO! 3<11- 00 -'I)! -'U <(Z W ~ m 3 w~ u. ::z:f- wu Ow -a.. (f)(f) ~o ~ :Ca.. (f) :::Jf- ro:z :::J o L: :z o f- 0<( > W --l W I- (f) 0<( w Iw wi ~ I w :z: % iil ~B I :z: -.I ::i w ::i :z: >- l~ ~l ::i ~ !Ii ~i t- >- ?< III~" Q! t- W CD to ll! t- I- ~.. ~ a... I~ :1 w 0 CL ~ ia Q! 0 a... ll! 0 CL U; U; ll! ;1 0 ll! w l- I- ~ ~ X 0 w Lori 0 0 N ~ NEW SECOND FLOOR BUILT OVER EXISTING NON-CONFORMINC, FIRST FLOOR (CODE SECTION 1~..i02B) I I W ~ ".'18' TO HOUSE -.I - IU . ZOt- (NEU SECOND FLOOR j WrI'U BUlL T OVER EXISTIN O<~ CONFORMING FIRST -3(1') <f)OO FLOOR WWrl' 20.'18' TO HOUSE Q! -0.. (I') ::I: Nt- ".00' TO PORCH ~I I <f) t"'t ~ :::JNO 1'f.00' TO PORCH (() "S PROPOSED PORCH TO PROTRUDE 5.00' FROM BUILDING FACADE INTO EXTERIOR SIDE '( ARD WEST ELEVATION BUSH RESIDENCE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL lEST IUV/illOH OtJIII.-nI. (1.#'1) 6V 4IJ.8-t& Uti) 9ZlIOt &1omJI '.UWIIrIo OfCM NYmJllYl ggn SL'1III.I1AY S&LYIJOSsy A YSONfJ I I I I I I ~. I l' ' 1:>3dSO~d lNnO... a~vma3 's ttt 3:>N3aJS3~ Hsns , , I I , \ \ \ \ D lEa m ~ ~ ~. w::::! u. :z:1- wu Ow . ll) 0- wll) (l!O (l! :r::0- ll) :::JI- lO:z: :::J o 1:: :z: o I- <( > W -l W :r:: I- (l! o :z: GARAGE EXISTING r----------------., I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 20.0' EXTERIOR SIDE SETBACK LINE FIRS T FLOOR PLAN (EXIS TING) EXTERIOR SIDE PROPERTY LINE BEDROOM I EXIS TING BEDROOM 2 EXISTING CLOSET ...----- I DINING ROOM EXISTING BEDROOM 3 EXISTING LIVING ROOM EXISTING EXISTING PORTION OF HOUSE NON- CONFORMING WITH EXTERIOR SIDE SETBACK ~ I &l ~ri I ~ !I~ ~I ~ IIII~ ~ !l9 ia W == u ...: :zou WOI!:w 0<0- -3d') <1')00 wWOl!: Q! . 0- d').... :J:NZ <l')N::J ::)N(' LO . ElClST1IIc. flRST fI.OOR Pl.AM EXISTING PORTION OF HOUSE CONFORMING WITH EXTERIOR SIDE SETBACK EXISTING PORTION OF HOUSE NON-CONFORMING WITH EXTERIOR SIDE SETBACK SOUTH ELEVATION BUSH RESIDENCE lEXISTING) MOUNT PROSPECT, IL ~ I ~ ~D I :a !i!~~ ~ III ~ ~ ~.. ~ .9 !I It! W =:! U . zo"" woeM 0<0- -3d') tOOo WWQ! Q! . 0- d').... ::I:NZ tON:J '::]NO ctJ r ElG!11MC. SOUTH aEVATlOM ~-tcu (/,tfJ) nEt l.U8-tZl. (Lt8) 9C'JIOlJ lIot11'1'l1 'UIAIIrR) OYIII 1IY9IDI1l1 9!m SJ.'lIWI,"" S:UV1~OSSV !VSONl'l 11 '1:)3dSO~d lNnOh a~vma3 'S ttt 3:JN3aIS3~ HSng 3NI1 )'H.l3dO~d ----- 3NI1 )l:JVI313S 30lS ~01~31NI ,O'S ------ 3NI1 )l:Jve13S 30lS ~01~31X3 .0'Ot 3NI1 )'1~3dO~d W II) :::J o :r o I- W II) :::J o :r o I- u..",w~ 0:z:0 U :z:X:cn< a!:i=~ oD'Il!JD w-< j:::Ool-w 11)= u.. :::JwJD @5:Z:Q211) oul:i:i Q..8~ :r:Z:1I) '" I x ",:$ w :z::Z:W :z:-'o j:::~:r ~~cn !nw!:: -Oil!: x 11)= xuo W:::J W - o D' :r ~ x w w=:! u. zt- WU Ow -0.... en en ~o GC I 0.... en ::J t- (Oz ::J o 1:: z o t- <( >........ w\.J --1 Z w- t- t-en enX <(w w- ~ ~ ~ ; 0llIlI& ~ (I.,.,) xv I.U8-t2.l. (l.tt) !lClOO9 lIOHI'J1J :uJANrm lJY(If IYtDIlYl ll9J1 ~ S3J,YI~OSSV AYsaNI'J 3NI1 ^Hj3dO~d 11 '1:)3dSO~d INnO~ 'O~Vm03 's ttt 3:JN3aJS3~ HSnS ~ z ~r Oat;W zoo 0.LLii') _z I-Oat; ~uo 0'- a..zat: ...0~:l.L """Zxu ~ww< tn~:J:iO xo!:::tu W:J:3(f) ~ u < iO I- Z W -:J:(() Wf-w ~30 Ow- :J:u(f) ~zat: z:$O -.....I~ f-o..w ~J::f- xox wuw w (f) :::J o :I: o I- Co 0- .... Co 0- o C"l 3NJl )I::JVQ13S 30lS ~OJ~31X3 ,o.oz: ------ ----- 3NI1 )I::JVQ13S 30lS ~OJ~31NI .O'S 3NI1 Al~3dO~d ~ ia i ~ ! w:::::! =:JI- ro::z =:J o 1:: ::z o I- <( >........ w\.:J --! ::z WI- I-tf) tf)X WW 3- , w--! I u~ z..- wu I Ow OJ -a.... c.f)c.f) wo , ~Ol: I I a.... c.f) ::::s ..- I (()Z ::::s 0 , 1:: OJ I OJ I I , I , I , I , I I , I , I I Z 0 , ..- I <( > w........ -10 wz I"- ..-c.f) Ol:X ow z- otNJ/.-;Z/. (I.,.,) %V UlS-tU (loti) !l2OOt Slotm'D 'UWIIJf) aYOIlYmmY.I vm ~ S:UVl:>OSSV !VSONl'l 11 · !::>3dSO~d !NnOw o~vma3 'S Z;Z;Z; 3~N3aIS3~ Hsne ~ ~ i I ~ -I Nii\'1 SURVEYiNG COm, ir\JC~ c f~--- ~I/I/a t:~/p- FESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM NO.184-003233 ,0, ~.C~l/ LAT OF SURVEY OF ,VENUE , 60630 /) 1') Z ,1/ ~ __" :"2, :::: :~; 8:"C~:~ ::'3 ::.; ::";::;':;;:'':; ;:';':;7;::;',. ':"uD;:Tlv,.. Tv l'i0ul~ I FKU:::'I-'t::\...1 iN ! HI:: t:A::o I ~ Uf ~t::C I iUN lL, 1 UWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF HIRO PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. . NE CORNER OF FENCE IS 0.20'S & 0.1 O'W t\ -', '" '" '" ~~''-' '1 STORY BRICK l ~ W/~~MENT ',,- ~ . ~~I _____ '-. IfU..U"" : ~ '" ~ ",,'"'''' "" ~-'-3062'--- .' + : , II ./ SOUTH FACE OF FENCE IS O.61'N'" ...... 11 ~ . './ ' T:;! ..,: , I," J 160.00 Rec. : IT T ce. . "28 E.....I~<......I. 1 LO fV", M 'I ' , , lU .Uk 1, , _~~ i i . I ~- - - - . , ~_o ~!---1 ;', :. LAND AREA: 7,998 SQ.FT. .......sw CORNER Of' FENCE is a.07'N & 0.20'[ N ",. !I ; ., '/ r " :' I I? ..'. . .' I .............................-.........32.40 '. - ~ <Xl N ~ ~ 0 ~ OO~ 0\0 .0 0\0 ~ ' V"l LOT 12 -, en <Xl <Ci .,.. , -/ I i . i! ..J i i ' f :. .' -= --l -L. .. L_._.~._. '! " .' :. . ,I.; r<- ID ci ~ .",~ 6(;) q; :E CQRNER OF FENCE IS 1. l7'N & O.12'W ~--z;--~ E.C. IS 1.30'S : " . . ._-----~~~~-----< " 160,02 M. , . , . .' . 2.00'5 & ON If. 00. I ~ I, i 160.00 Rec. i' . <. I / i ! '.. \ /. 4. \ / " \ -- I :.:-":_.===-=-..;__J. " CROSS CUT 2.00'E & 2.00'S ~ i ~ r----,. ~ -~-===-_:::::::--::::::::..-.:::.:.~:::::;:;:- i I 4 t ' , I . I I' "I ~ ====:::;=__1' -7'~~:( BIC IS 20.35'S E" MIL.BURN AVE. mla 11/9/05 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 222 SOUTH EDWARD STREET WHEREAS, Joseph and Amy Bush ("Petitioners") have filed a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 222 South Edward Street ("Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 12 in Block 18 in Busse's Eastern Addition Mount Prospect in the East one-half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois Property Index Number: 08-12-217-024-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation to allow for construction of an unenclosed porch and entryway and create a sixteen foot (16') and fourteen foot (14') respectively exterior side yard setback, as shown on the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Variations being the subject of PZ-39-05 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of October 2005, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 12th day of October 2005; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and positive recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request and have determined that it meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: ~ 222 S. Edward Street Page 2/2 SECTION ONE: The above recitals are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do grant the Variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.7 of the Village Code, to allow for a sixteen foot (16') and fourteen foot (14') respectively exterior side yard setback as shown on the Site Plan, which shall be installed only in strict accordance with Exhibit "A". SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of November, 2005. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H :\GEN\fi les\ WI N\ORD I NANC\Variation ,222sedwardnov05.doc I/,O. 02 [---' ~j I.u_ I I GARAGE NEW 2ND STORY ADDITION DRIVEWAY blt1 0< ~ffi '" 8 ". ,u-) I .....1 I I _I) ,,~ SITE PLAN E /1IL8URN A VENUE EB NORTH 222 S. Edward Street Site Plan I~ 10) ~ II~ 153 mla 11101105 RESOLUTION NO. -05 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO THE MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY UNDER THE TERMS OF A GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on November 6, 2002, the Village of Mount Prospect ("the Village") and the Mount Prospect Public Library ("the Library") entered into a Ground Lease Agreement (the "Lease") providing, among other things, for the Village to lease certain property ("Property") from the Library; and WHEREAS, the Village has caused its attorney and staff to review the terms of the Lease and the current status of the Property and its usage; and ,WHEREAS, the attorney and staff have reported that both the Village and the Library are in substantial compliance with all material terms of the Lease; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have determined that it is in the best interests of the Village and its residents to assure that there is continued compliance with the Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: That the parties are in substantial compliance with all material terms of the Lease. SECTION TWO: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees authorize the Village Director of Finance to pay the Library such sums as are due pursuant to the Lease. SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this 15th day of November, 2005. Irvana K. Wilks, Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk H:ICLKOIfilesIWIN\RES\Lease pymt, Library & VOMP,parking2005.doc c ~-----_.'"--~--~'----'~______~_C'.~~"~""~"",~L'.""""''''.,",,,,,,,_,,"="""';;;:=^''''='''='''''~;''''.''~A~~_.'~~__'_________,~~___,_,_,_ Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM FROM: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~. t..h-c, \\(I5{0'5"' TO: DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2005 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A PLAT OF SURVEY CONDOMINIUMS SUBJECT: Attached to this memorandum is a Resolution that accepts the Plat of Survey for the Dover Condominium project that was previously approved by the Village in 2004. State Statutes require the Village to approve this recorded plat as part of the condominium conversion process. This plat must be accepted and duly recorded in order for the developer to sell the condominium units. Please forward this memorandum and attached Resolution to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their November 15th meeting. Staff will be at that meeting to answer any questions related to this matter. H:\ADMN\BILL\MEMOS\MEJ\2005\dover plat.doc ]) -.--"---.-----------...----.-~-~_..----"'..--.~----_~=="W'..~'~~~_.,._..__~_______~""'""=_"~_=,=_"""',"",..='''''_''''''<'''"''.,,,=.=~__,,___.___,___..______._._..___.___ bh/mla 11/10/05 mla 11/09/05 RESOLUTION NO. -05 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLAT OF SURVEY FOR CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Dover Park, Inc. has requested approval of a Plat of Survey for condominium conversion for the property and improvements located at 1915 White Chapel Drive, 1845 White Chapel Drive, 1815 White Chapel Drive, 1910 Hatherleigh Court, 1840 Hatherleigh Court, 1810 Hatherleigh Court, 1905 Hatherleigh Court, 1835 Hatherleigh Court, 1805 Hatherleigh Court, 1900 Knights Bridge Drive, 1830 Knights Bridge Drive, 1800 Knights Bridge Drive, 1480 South Busse Road, 1500 South Busse, 1455 Canford Cliffs Road and 1505 Canford Cliff Road; and WHEREAS, the plat of survey has been reviewed by the Village staff and meets the requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect condominium conversion ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The plat of survey for condominium conversion at 1500 South Busse Road, 1800 Knights Bridge, 1805 Hatherleigh Court and 1830 Knights Bridge, is hereby approved for appropriate execution, and such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution. SECTION TWO: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from, and after, its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of November, 2005. Irvana K. Wilks, Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk H :\CLKO\files\WI N\RES\Plat of Resubdiv ,dovepa rkcondosn ovember2005doc \' - r- 532,02 I ... WA1~ PER *-flJtll~ NCI DOC.lUII' ~ i ~ i ~ i -:::- ~8 ~l 5 , ;t~ ~ ~ i . "8 ~ !s . m~ LA K i: ~ 4 Is II ~ I :~ ; i e I I soun:Swn. UN[ Of LOT 2 IN EDWARD BUSSE'S DMSION ==.===--==-~._==_=--~f:.~_:-:== ~___.:'~r_~~_~_~~::=_':~:~~_'__.._..._-_~..?~_=_~_= - -- f\\+ LAW OFFICES KLEIN, THORPE AND JENKINS, LTD. RINDA y. ALLISON TERRENCE M. BARNICLE JAMES P. BARTLEY THOMAS P. BAYER GERARD E. DEMPSEY MICHAEL J. DUGGAN JAMES V. FEROLO E. KENNETH FRIKER BR]AN M. FUNK CYNTH[A S. GRANDFIELD KATHLEEN T. HENN EVERETTE M. HILL, JR. MICHAEL T. JURUSIK JACOB H. KARACA PATRICK A. LUCANSKY TELEPHONE (3 ]2) 984-6400 FACSIMILE (312) 984-6444 FACSIMILE (312) 606-7077 LANCE C. MALINA MICHAEL A. MARRS THOMAS M. MELODY JANETN. PETSCHE DONALD E. RENNER, III SCOTT F. UHLER GEORGE A WAGNER ALLEN WALL DENN[S G. WALSH JAMES G. WARGO BRUCE A. ZOLNA SUITE 1660 20 NORTH WACKER DRIVE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606-2903 ORLAND PARK OFFICE 15010 S. RAVINIA AVE., SUITE 17 ORLAND PARK, IL 60462-3162 TELEPHONE (708) 349-3888 FACSIMILE (708) 349- 1506 OF COUNSEL JAMES A. RHODES RICHARD T. W[MMER WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL (3 (2) 984-6420 WRITER'S E-MAIL emhill@ktjnet.com MEMORANDUM TO: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager Village of Mount Prospect FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr. DATE: November 1, 2005 RE: Hamilton Riverwalk/County Subdivision Attached is a PUD Plat submitted to the Village by Red Seal Development Corporation for our review. I have also attached a memo from our engineering staff with respect to such review. As you can see, this is a Cook County development. After some discussion with the developer's attorneys questioning our extra-territorial jurisdiction, it was agreed that the developer would not be required to submit to our full resubdivision process so long as the plan met our storm water requirements and was in general accord with our development code. This has been accomplished and I am requesting that, based on our engineering staff's approval, that the Village Board authorize the Mayor to execute the Plat. iManage 163683 I E Moullt Prospect ~ Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE ATTORNEY Buzz HILL FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER CHUCK lINDELOF DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 2005 SUBJECT: HAMILTON RIVERWALK The proposed Hamilton Riverwalk development is located outside the Village of Mount Prospect. It will be served by the Illinois American Water Company, so we did not review the proposed water main and sanitary sewer system. However, the site is located along McDonald Creek, so we did review and confirm that the proposed plans and calculations meet the Village of Mount Prospect Codes regarding stormwater detention and floodplain requirements. Other items such as pavement widths and sections, grading, etc. were looked at briefly. We found that there are items that do not meet the Village of Mount Prospect Codes, but the deficiencies are minor, and do not impact the Village. Consequently, because the proposed development will not adversely impact the Village, we have no objections, and approve the plans for construction. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Chuck Lindelof bh/mla 11/10/05 mla 11/9/05 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, the Petitioner, RSD River Road, LLC, (Petitioner), has requested approval of a Final Plat of Resubdivision for the purpose of subdividing one lot to create forty-four lots of record located along McDonald Creek in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the proposed plans and calculations meet the stormwater detention and floodplain requirements of the Mount Prospect Village Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed planned unit development is not within the corporate boundaries of the Village of Mount Prospect; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The resubdivision of one (1) lot into forty-four lots of record is hereby granted for the property along McDonald Creek in Cook County, Illinois and the Final Plat of Resubdivision attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution. Such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution. SECTION TWO: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: day of ,2005. PASSED and APPROVED this Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\CLKO\files \WI N\RES\PlatofResu bdivriverwalkcookcountynovember 2005.doc JIIl_AlP.Co ~"E --- ... 41 _AT_ .... .....'lIII"r Ill: DlIUUI CIUIC -_~I"'._IIO.__ O."'II"O&, EAIElltHT : l' ~ a..~ ": ii~i 1~1il 5 'C ------ :::...... ---, -----------~----~---- c z ~iE :s 8 i~ ~ i zuo zuo >>JlO ... ... 1a 1=. 4UO D . . .. :1.1 I. ... zuo II..... Ill: s ~ ~ I .j I .. , 8r I sa f Iftl ~ iE 44 f:1 ... ~ ~ ~ a:uo ZUD ,. IS 118 ,. 20 2t 21 l3 "'; Q ~.. AllII zuo zuo zuo z --. [__II ---....- ....- LM OF LOT :Ill .. Z7 MORRISON AVENUE (\o(kl~ _'lED ..Cllt P\IIIUC SlIlIE1) ~ -....-. II.U ..... . ~ ,\\~