HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/15/1957 VB minutes
3'14
seetlon of Prospect Avenue and Emerson Street. There was
some discussion of the problem involved and participation
from persons present. Police Ch.ief Vv'hi ttenberg stated
that he believed that the installation of such a sign
would help relieve traffic congestion during the rush
hour periods. 1he President put the question and the
Clerk called the roll, with the following response:
Aye s: Trustee s Airey, Cas~erline, Schlaver and 1'ifille r.
Nays: Trustees Broad and ~orris, whereupon the Pres-
~ent declared the motion carried.
Village HanagerAppleby stated that he had
received all necessary contracts and bonds pertaining
to the paving of Highland Avenue. It was moved by
Trustee Schlaver and seconded by TI~stee Willer, that
permission be granted to Skokie Valley Asphalt Gompfu~Y
to proceed with the paving of Highland Avenu~ as per
agreement with Brickman Home Builders. 'Ihe President
put the question fu~d the vote was taken by acclMaation,
whereupon the President declared the motion carried.,
A motion 1;'I)'as made by '1' rus tee [,ville r, seconded
by Trustee Norris to authorize the returning of bid
checks on Motor Fuel Tax maintenance work to the
Skokie Valle.:r Asphalt Company and Milburn Brothers.
'l'he President put. the qnestion and the vote lias taken
by acclamation, whereupon the President declared the
motion carried.
Village Manager Appleby stated that work on
Motor Fueld T~x project ll-CS was moving along at a
rapid pace. 11e also submitted the request of Village
Attorney Downing that a 1'rustee attend the hearing on
Weber lots to be held on October 25th. Trustee Willer
consented to attend.
Trustee Schlaver referred to a letter from the
Village Attorney with respect to free parking in the
commuter parking lot on Saturdays, Sundays, and
holidays$ This letter is being reviewed by Trustee
Norris' committee.
There being no fUrther business to come before
the Board, a motion was made by trustee Willer, seconded
by Trustee Broad, that the meeting be adjourned" The
Presiden t put the question and a vote was taken by
acclamation,,,hereupon the President declared the
motion carried a~d the meeting regularly adjourned at
10:50 P.M.
~L:eL~ j~
~ ----~
William H" Keith
Village Clerk
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
lHE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING,
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS ON
T~BSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1957.
The meeting was called to order at 8:40 P.M$ by
Presiden t Larns and the Clerk Has then directed to call
the roll.,
On roll call, the follmving Trus tee s ansY-Jared
llpresent": Airey, Broad, CasteI'line, Norris, Schlaver,
and Willer. Absent: None.
Trustee Schlaver stated that the minutes of the meet-
ing held October 8, 1957 shou~d be corrected by changing
the next to the last paragraph to read: "'Trustee Norris I
Co:mmi tteell instead of llTrustee Schlaver' s Committee". Ii.
motion Has made by 'l'ru st-ee Norri s and seconded by 'I'rus tee
Schlaver that the minutes of the meeting held October 8,
1957 be approved as correc ted.. 'I'he Pre siden t put the
question and the Clerk called the rell, T"rith the follm,,-
October 15~ 1957
3
ing response: Ayes: All, Nays: None, TJlfhereupon
the President declared the motion carried.
It "V-Jas moved by t rus tee Airey and se conded by
Trustee Willer that the Village of Ivlount Prospect
Treasurer I s Report of Sep tember 30, 1957 be approved
and placed on record~ Trustee Airey pointed out
corrections in the 'l'reaS1Jrer' s Report -v.rherein the
words "Elk Grove Village II were used in error for "Elk
Grove Townshipll. 1'he Presiden t put the question a."'1d
the Clerk called the roll, with the follol<Jing reSPOtiSE
Ayes: All, Nays: None, whereupon the President declarE
the motion carried and the 1'reasurer I s report approvec
as corrected.
It was moved by Trustee Airey and seconded by
Trustee Norris that tt'& list of bills incurred in the
lVlonth of September, 1957 be approved for payment. 'I'hE
President put the question and the Clerk called the
roll, with the following response: Ayes: All, Nays:
None, whereupon the President declared the motion
carried.
~1'OO.'t
A motion was made by Trustee Airey aDf seconded
by 'llrustee Casterline tha t the 'l'reasurer I s Report
of Special Assessment Fund for the Village of Mo~mt
Prospect dated September 30, 1957 be approved and
placed on record. 'J'he President put the question
and a vote was taken by acclamation, whereupon the
President declared the motion carried.
...."'~,
......,.0"
,-
.-....J
.<
~..~t
Trustee Broad reporting for the Building Commit1
sta ted that the Building comparison figures SIlOW an
increase of $1..1-5,075..00 for 1957 as compared with
September, 1956..
Trustee Airey stated that plans were being
prepared for the erection of a foot bridge across
Weller Creek at Main Street and said plans would be
available next week.
'1'rustee Willer then read the following letter:
October 11, 1957
Mr.. Erwin M. Hurt
1106 South Home Avenue
Park Ridge, Illinois
Dear lVIr.. Hurt:
In reference to your request of October 11, 1957 as t,
whether a State Access Permit will be issued for your
proposed store developm.ent at the northlrJest corner of
Main Street and Central Road in Mount Prospect, permii
shall be issued based upon Carl M.. Teutsch's Sketch
No" 5704-D dated Oc tober 11, 1957..
Details of the permit and final geometrics of the dri1
way TAlil1 be indica ted by thi s Department upon formal
application by you for permission to begin constructi(
Very truly yours,
s/ J. p. Tuthill
Vis tric t Englneer"
Trustee Willer then read a portion 0 f the last
paragraph of a letter dated October 5, 1957 addressed
to the Board of '.trustees in regard to applications
57-10 ~Dd 57-Ii and signed by the Chairman and Acting
Se cretary of the Zoning Commi ssi on as fol101'JS:
"After due considerat:i cn of all fa.ctors, the
Zoning Commission by a 4" to 1 vote recOIf1JTIended that
these applications be gran ted by the Board of
'1irustee s.. l!
October 15, 1957
':) 7 g.,
'l..:~ @u
A motion ',.Jas made by 'l'rusteeWiller and seconded
by Trustee C8.sterline that the Board concu:e "f-v:Lth the
recormnendations of the Zoning Corr.mission Hith respect
to Cases [:;7-10 and 57-11 and that the Village Attorney
be instructed to prepare the necessary ordinances
fu""}.d papers to bring about the zoning change. Trus tee
Broad spoke in opposition to the rezoning of this
property from Residential to Parkings Mr. J. C. King
of 108 N. tville Street also spoke in opposi tion to tb.e
rezoning of said property. Mr. Eugene F. W. Martin,
Chairman of the Zoning Commission, clarifi ed the
stand of the Zoning Commission in this matter. IVIr.
Frank N. Lynn stated that b.e belj_eved the proposed
business distr:i.ct to occupy the triangular area bounded
by Central Road and Northwest Highway would adequately
meet the needs of the Village and that the s~wrounding
residential area Emd the Village as a l.-/hole world be
harmed if Mr. BurtIs property were allowed to be
rezoned from Residential to Parking. In answer to a
l' ' -i f", \'11" Ei t." t' h 1 1" h'. l~ 1 ri
q__,-es-c~on ~rom L~ .__ng La-c 11.e pU.) J_e _~ad no -I.HOW e~"ge
of the contents of the Kincaid Report: T'rustee Willer
stated that the Kincaid Report in its entirely had been
released to the press. Tbere being no f-urther discuss-
:'[on, the President restated Trustee 1tJiller's motion to
concur 1fiy5 th the recomJ:l1endation of the Zoning Comm.ission
on Cases 57-10 and 57-11& The President put the question
fu'!.d the Clerk called the roll, w:ith the folloH5.ng response:
Ayes: Trustee Airey, Casterline, Schlaver and (iviller.
Nays: Trustee Broad and. Norris. .Absent: None, whero11pon
the President declared the motion c ed.
TI'usteeitJil1.er then read the follovdng letter:
October 13, 1957
Hr. Roher t J. DOv..1Yling
Board of 'I'rade Building
Chicago, Illinois
Des.r Bob:
I enclose here1:-Iith a copy of proposed fJit. Pros:poct
Ordinance Amendments drafted bv you. This COl.'Y [.tas
.u ..l. v
SOIne sllggested. cr:1anges n()ta.ted in perleil. in the rnarcirls
as made by our Zoning Corrmdssion. Where tbese changes
are in tbe best interests of.the Village of IVIolmt
Prospect, I NOllle' suggest that they bei:ncorpoY'!-1ted
in tbe revi sed. (',raft. .tmy cbange S Bugge s ted tba tare,
in your opinicn, not in the best interests of the
Village should be disregarded.
An addi tional merrJ.Q from [lIr. J\1artin of the ZonLn.g
Com:mission asks certain qrlestions that you vJil1 H8.nt
to give some thought to.
Tbe Zonin.g Cornm.i ssi on has egre ed to h an
additional public hearin.g: in November on thf) fir'st
(Friday flS 1~elJ.. as date )'--; In or~der t.llat our ]~ega.J..
notice in the local paper can be in on time to make
a November' 1st deadline, it Hould be vrell :if you
coul,d se.nd a co of Jrollr revi sect dy~aft necess8,r:{
for -oubl1cation to Hr. Appleby on l\![onday.
S:tnc. e re]. ~T Y()llr s 5
" I
0/
Raymond L. Willer
'I'rus tee
Village of hount Prospect~
The following letter was
then read:
October 15, 1957
October 14, 1957 377
Mr. H. G. Appleby, Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
112 East North1~rest Highvmy
lViount Prospect, Illinois
Dear Harold:
Ref'erence is made to Trustee W~llcr's letter
dated October 13 concerning proposed revisions of the
NO"Lmt Prospect Zoning Ordina...Ylce. Attached hereto are
the proposed amendments to the follovJing sections of
Ule pre sen t zoning ordinance:
Section 16. 1lhis re-estab1ishes the Board
of Appeals (the zoning cormnission will be
abolished by these amendments). '1'his section
establishes the jurisdict.ion of the Board of
Appeals. It also sets out the nature of the
TlJork and the r1annE~r of conducting m.eetings,
and the type of decl slons vib..i ch may be made by
said Board of Appeals.
~:'''!--~
Section 19 is amended to place a nevJ definition
on Amendments.
/~'V""':
... ,:;,'
,.,0-"'''''"-
'--..
Section 20 is amended by abolishing the zoning
corn.mission and using the section for a new
definition for Variations.
~~~::
1<~:""'1<;1;
These proposed amendments to Follow substantj.al:
1"rha t Has previously forHarded to the corporate.
authorities on JuJ.y 11, 1957.. Certain changes have
been made in keeping Hi th 'l'rustee Willer' s suggestion~
of October 13. Due to legal considerations, I ~ not
feel it desir'able to make some of' the proposed 0/1)
1\ - ~
change s. OTHGR
Should it l)e the desire of the Board of 1'rustee:
to adopt these Bnlendments after a public hearing and
recomrnendation by the Zoning Commission, it will then
be necessary to establish, by action of the Board of
'llrustees, fees to be charged for each type of appeal..
These proposed amendments must be referred to
the Zoning Commission for public hearing before final
action may be taken by the Board of '1'rusteese
Sincerely,
S/ Robert J.. D01rmlng
A motion was made by Trustee Willer and seconde(
by Trustee Casterline that the proposed zoning ord-
inance amendmen ts be referred to the Zoning Corn..>nissi01
for publi ca tion and he ar ing on November 1, 1957. 'l'be
President put the question 8.nd the Clerk called the
roll, with the following response: Ayes: All, Nays:
None, VJhereupon the Presiden t declared the motion
carried.
'l'rus tee Willer then read the following le tter:
Oc tabeI'
11
.J....",_ ,
1957
Nr .Harold Appleby
Village of Mt.Prospect
112 East Northwest Highway
Mt. Prospect, Illinois.
Dear Mr.. Appleby:
In regard to the Petition to Zone Property file(
by the Exchange National Bank 0 f Chicago, as 'l'rustee
under 1'rus tf No.. 6930, please be advised tha t l'IThile
tbi s Petj tj.on is asking for busine ss use, the
spe d.fic' reque s twas t..o zone thj_s property"B-l".
1;T:)uld you kindly l3.dd to the last paragraph in
October 15, 1957
(~ '~1. 8
. 1.
0. .
t. -!- . .... '- h-'" e l! D "1 II
O1.J.r pe lvlon loDe p. ras, D-..L..
'l'b,a:nking ;y"ou for ;;.our considerati on, I remain,
Very truly your s ,
s/ Allan R" Blitlch
This matter was referred to the Village Clerk
to inform members of the Zoning Corr~ission"
'l'rustee Norris discussed the advisability of a
visible means of identification for members of the
Water Lepartment and the Northern Illinois Gas Company.
He stated that he believed such visible identification
Tr.Jas necessary to prevent undue. alarm to citizens..
'1'rus tee Schlaver s ta ted that s orne means of ic1entif'ica tion
for members of the Hater Department wOlJld be considered"
Presicient Lams requested the Village Clerk to v,7ri te a
letter to the Northern Illinois Gas Company requesting
tJ:-~eir employees to iniear vis:1.ble identification; buttons
or tagss
'I'rustee \Nillpr then read the follovJing letter:
October 15, 1957
President, Village Board
Mt" Prospect, Illinois
Dear Sir:
Reques t v8.riatio n from the 20! _Oil minirrn..ml rear yard in
the Business District.
Archi teet Co-cnrc.i ttee can not approve Plans until a
variation has been gr8l1ted"
Our reasons for variation:
1.
Location. 0 f bui.ldi.ng as pJ_anJled 1rJOUld per:rni t.
better use of parking facilities"
')
c...
It 11'/il1 a.lso permi t better use of the bu:i.lding
in relation to the parking facilities.
?
-' "
It will also avoid use of the Alley entirely.
ide realiz.e that an.y variation of zoning Hill require a
1fJai ting period. HOitJever, if this could be 8.cted upon
at this time, it '"Jill enable us to get started with
our building program before the cold weather. This
would be a great help to us.
l,ve HOl..11d appreciate prompt consideration of this r'eqt!..est.
Sincerely yours,
Doyno Motors, Inc.
S/ V. A., Doyno
It TrJas moved by ~['rustee!rliller ano. seconded hy
Trustee Norris that this matter be referred to the
Zoning Board of Appeals for publica tion and hearing.
'The President put the question &'!d 8 vote 1I'JaS taken
by acclamation, whereupon the Presiden t declared the
motion carried$
Village M~Dager Appleby stated that he had attended
a public hearing before the Illinois Commerce Comrrd.ssion
on October 15, 1957 in whi..ch the Public Service Compan~T
had requested fl.J1 increase in rates. All information bas
been turned over to tbe Village Att01'ney.
A motion 'Nas made by 'lrustee Willer and seconded by
Trustee Norris that l\olr. Jame s 'vIi,. Viger be emplpyed
as Arcbitect to submit plans for an addition to the
October 15, 1957
j\hmicipal Bldlding to be used for Fire Station
purposes. After much discussion, Trustee Willer
changed the wording of hi s motion to read in part:
IIIvlr. James We Viger be approached as archi teet".
The Presj_dent put the question and tbe vote was taken
by acclamation, whereupon tbe President declared the
motion carried.
~i"'fO
v&v
I'lIr. E. K.Whitener of 301 1\1. Elmhurst referring
to Resolution 1.5-57 stated that he had ffio~ed into the
Village in July of 19.57 and was unaware of sidewalk
restrictions at that time. He further stated that he
has signatures of 100% of fronting property 01~ers in
bi s block and wishe s to ins tall curb sidev-Jalks.. He
irJa8 informed by Board Members and the Village llilanager
that curb sidewalks are prohibited by Hesolution 15-5'
after the date of September 15, 1957.
'Trustee 1fJil1er then read the folloHing letter:
October 10, 1957
~
Theodore Lams, President
and Board of 1'rustees of the
VillaEe of Ivlte Prospect
Municipal Building
Mt. Prospect, Illinois
~...~
'.
~>l._,.....
;.~~!
""-::
Re: Zoning variation - Lot 22, Block 7 -
Nt. Pro::u2,ect Subdivision
Gentlemen:
We represent Soft Water Service, Inc., the o~ner of
the property at 3 West Central Road, Mt. Prospect,
Illinois which is lega]t described as follows:
Lot 22, Block 7 in Mount Prospect, being a
Subdivisj.on in Section 12, Tmvnship 41, North,
Range 11, East of the 'I'hird Principal l"leridian,
in Cook County, Illinois.
Soft Water Service, Inc., furnishes soft water to
residences, commercial establisrments and businesses
in the area from their office and regeneration plant
at the above address. 'l'he above descri.bed property
is a vacant lot ilTl.mediately west of and adjoining
tbeir of.'fice and regeneration plant. 'lhis property
was p~~chased a few years ago in contemplation of the
necessit~r for expansion of their facilities, and a
re -zoning of it from Residential to Co!nmercial Class
B District was approved by the Village.. '1'he time
for expansion has now arrived because of the dynamic
gro1DIth in the populat ion of the area. 'l'heir pre sen t
facilities have become inadequate and it is desired
ttat an additional one story office addition be
constructed on the above described property. This
office addition is to be attached to their present
building whlch is located on the lot immediately
adjacent to the east. The lot on irJhich the building
1.s to be constructed is of the depth of 60' 8-3/411 frc
ing on Wille Street, and 1.57' 1-1/2" fronting on
Central Street. Tte proposed building addition is
59'6" in length and 36'10" in width fronting on
Central Street, and Hill be used for office and
display purposes, with adequate parking, and we are
sure will be a welcome addition to the area, both
functionally and architecturally..
TrLe property falls -within a C12.ss ~ District. Sectiol
15 of your Zoning Ordinance requfures that any buildini
erected in this district be set back from the rear
lot line at least 20 feet. A request for a variation
in the size of the rear yard, 1eJith payment of the
necessar;y fee as required by the Zoning Ordinance,
was made to the Zoning Board of Appeal s.. H01"yev8'",
al though the Boan~ of Appeal s was sJ'111pa the ti c to our
October 15, 195'
J:i 8 '0
It,
appeal and desired to grant it, the request was denied
on- the basis of the limi tation of the Board! s di.scretion
contained in Section 16E of the Zoning Ordinance allow-
ing them to act only if lithe proposed variation will
not (1) reduce the minimum area of dimensions nor
increase the maximum dimensions by more than 2.5%.,"
In vie~J of this ordinence requirement, the Zoning
BoaI'd rightly stated tha t they were unable to grant
the variation inasmuch as they IN"ere bound to confo:r>lll
to the Village Zoning Ordinance.,
We respectfully maintain that this restriction on the
Board of Appeals is unreasonable ffi1d lITmeCessary., rrhe
Board of Appeals is designed to aid those partie S 1clho
suffer an undue hardship amounting to v-.Tha t may be sai.d
to be a confiscation of their property if the Zoning
Ordinance was applied strictly to them. By placing
this restriction on them" they are prevented from
effectively performing their flmction.
This is especially true and highlighted in the present
situation., Here there is no dedicated alley. The
lack of' an alley eliminates the necessity of this 20
foot rear yard. 1'he lots directly to the south of and
abutting the property in question do not conform to this
requirement., Allm-Jing this buildi.ng to be built on the
rear 20 feet of the lot would nei ther j_mpair an adeq.ua.te
supply of light and aid to adjacent property, increase
the congestion in public streets unreasonably, increase
the hazard of fire, endanger the public safety, diminish
nor impair the values of property wj_ thin the surrounding
areas nor in any respect impair the public health, safety,
comfort, morals and welfare of the people, as required
to be considered before a variation can be gr&~ted. By
requiring Soft Water Service, Inc., to still maintain
such a yard, tbeir property in effect is being taken from
them. Certainly, the contemplated location of the
addition is the ideal spot for such a structure to be
erectAd. If Soft Water Service, Inc., is forced to
build this addition so as to conform wi th the minimu:m
rear yard areri., the addi tion 117il1 have to be bull t so
that its east-west dimensions are considerably greater,
and its north-south dimensions consideNlbly less than
contemplated.
'llr:e ne t effe ct of such a required modi 1'i cati on, among
other things, ,^!ould greatly reduce the proposed parking
area, at a time when the parking requirements of your
Village and other Villages ar.e most acute.
In viet'\! of the foregoing, lflle respectfull;l request that
YO"D..r BOEi..rd of 'J..'rus tee s give consideration to amending
Sect.ion 16E of your Zoning OrcUnanee eliminate the
present restriction so as to allow the latitude of
discretion in the Board of Appeals which your confidence
in their integri ty ju.stifies by your appointment of the
individual citizens to it.
\~Je ~arnestly solicit your consideration to this request,
a:nd ,.Jill appear before the Board and presen t the matter
orally to them if you deem it in order.
Sufficient copies of this letter are enclosed for
distribution to member's of the Board. vIe should
appreciate itji' final decision ("If' the Board of Appeals
may be held in 8..beyance until pur request has been
considered so that we may not lose our filing fee.
In the event of favorable decision, the Board of
Appeals 1r.Jill then be able to reconsider our applicat:ton
and grant the variation as originally requested.
'I1hanking you for your courtesy and cooperation,
we
aY'''''
~ ~. ,
Yours very truly,
HERIVf.AN &, POLLAK
sj B. Lc Pollak
October 15, 1957
€il r,
t1(j
This matter Has referred to the Judiciary
Com.mittee.
There being no fl~ther business to come before
the Board, it was moved by Trustee Broad and seconded
by Trustee Airey that the meeting be adjourned. The
Pre sident put the question and a vo te TtJas taken by
acclamation, whereupon the President declared the
motion carried and the meeting regularly adjourned
at 9:55 P .]vI.
\'il~~~th1'l /~
Village Clerk
IvIINU'I'ES OF' A REGULAR I'IE ETING ~F
TtE PRESIDENT AI~ BOARD OF TRUSTEES
HELD IN JVillNICIPAL RUILDING,
lJiOUNT PROSP';~C'I', ILLINOIS ON
'I'TT}i'sDAY, OC'l'OBER 22, 1957..
~~'"~
The meeting Has called to order at. 8:L~2 P.II/i. by
President Lams and tte Clerk vias then di.rected tc: call
the roll.
,,~..,'~
.........,....
'---'
,....~
On roll call, the folloHing 'Trustees ansHered
IlPr.esentll: Airey, Broad, Casterline, NorI'is, Schlaver,
&~d Willer. Absent: None.
All Trustees having previously received conies 0
the minutes of the meeting held October 15, 1957, it
l-Jas moved by 'I'rus tee V'! iller and secon ded by 'l'rus tee
Casterline that said minutes be approved as submi tted.
'J'he President put the question ex,d the Clerk called
the roll ,~,Ji th -she .follm,ring response: Ayes: All;
Nays: I'Tone, 'AThereupon the Pre siden t d.e clared the
motj_cn carried tlTI.d sajd. In.in.'D.tes flpprlo"\led as s11hrnitted.
Pre sideD. t 118m.s read the fol1.'~i~,\Jlng letter:
Octobel" 1 7, 1 '-;:'57
Village of I'!Iount Prospect
112 East NortrnJ8st EighHay
I'10unt Prospec t, Illinois
A ~C~CEl\T~CIO iT: rJ1J~ * }121.ro ld f1.~()p Ie b~.;'
(fen tler:1erL :
Representatives of the Board o.f Education of
.j.-', ri'.,. <'n. B" b ::=>+ 1 r4 c;+r{ + 21il ha~Te (1{ 1'''' .<:;eo'
vr-'.6 ...:..O;,fJn"').I._:..J_p ~J..C ~ I_........~JOO .LJ..:...1...,. v _-,-c...., -" ~ J..... 'J ...l.._,_s......l.'~s"'-'..
ldi ttl ~ro'u tr.le constru.c tj. on. o~f a si(}e~rVaJ~k aJ..ong tJ.~1e
sctcool property on the south side of Foundry Hoa(.~.
It is i:;he inteYlti.on of tr.:-8 130ard of E'~ct1.lCfltio:n
to construct a sid81,'7alk aJong tl:.e soutr.1 side o.f
F01.mdry Road in accordance 1d:L th the '0i11a2:e of
TJIount Pros~pect x~eqrtirer(J.en.ts. 11~he f'ill al.o:"lg t118
south side o.f Fou-,>:lclry Road Hill be completecl this
.fall so tta tit may se ttle before the ilJalk is
cons truc ted. 'The cons true tion of the vJalk is
planned for ear l;y- Sl..1..()']Jcer.
If 2~,(ld.i ti anal -!/I.T~lJ~lr::s irl tru9 'Ii a.ge of I<tt..
Prospect are to be included in a general assessment
and incl"ude the proposed HaIk along the scbool
prcpel~ty, th,e I3oaJ~cl of Edl)..catj_on, 'kJ 0 111 c_ liJ;e ar1
o:pport,unj_t;r to elise-USE; tr16 nJ.fttter~ ':.~Jith ttle Tv"'i.l,12I.g.o
prior' to fj..nal arranr:ements.
- - Sincerely vours
'" ,)
SI GAc'~~e ~~en~~~~
!... I ...; ~..- (-~ -' vii .t:-'.f:Jd_. v.
P~re sicien t
Board of Education
T'OT~Jrls]J_:t-p Higb. Scr'iooJ_
Li.s tric t j/211.!. Oct. 22, 1957