HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/03/1957 VB minutes
1:112
and the Board of Trustees, I wish to thank you for
the beautiful lavender chrysanthemums and pompom mums.
These magnificent flowers decorated our new
Village Hall during our Dedication and Open House
ceremonies and added immeasurably to the attractiveness
of our new building on this important day.
If any of your other trustees (I met two of them)
or other Village officials wish to visit our new
Village Hall and Service Building. Please stop over at
your convenience. We would be happy to show you around.
We appreciate your thoughtfulness. With my best
wi she s, I am
Sincerely,
SI R. B. Morris
Village Manager
There neing no further business to come before the
Board, a motion was made by 1'rustee Norris and seconded
by Trustee Broad that the meeting be adjourned. The
President put the question and the vote was taken by
acclamation, whereupon the President declared the motion
carried and the meeting regularly adjourned at 9:36 P.M.
d~7/-~
William H. 1\:ei th
Village lIlerk
MINU1'ES OF A REGULAR !v1EE'l'ING
OF THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUST::~ES HELD IN 'I'HE MUNICIPAL
BUILDING, MOUNT PROSPEC11, ILLINOIS
ON TUESDAY, DEC~lBER 3, 1957
The meeting was called to order at 8:42 P.M. by
President Lams and the Clerk was then directed to call
the roll.
On roll call, the following Trustees answered
"Present": Airey, Broad, Casterline, Norris, Schlaver
and Willer. Absent: None.
All Trustees having previously received copies of
the minutes of a meeting held November 26, 1957, a motion
was made by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Broad
that the minutes be approved as submitted and amended by
the Village Clerk. The President put the question and
the Clerk called the roll, with the following response:
Ayes: All; Nays: None, 'VJhereupon the President declared
the motion carried.
Trustee Norris read Resolution No. 24-57, A RESOL-
UTION ESTABLISHING SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE ALLEYS
W~THIN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT. It was moved by
Trustee Norris and seconded by rrrustee Broad that
Resolution No. 24-57 be adopted. A motion was made by
Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Norris to amend
Resolution 24-57 by changing the fourth word in the sub-
paragraph of Section 1 from "1.vhen" to "shall be" and by
changing the punctuation mark in the sub-paragraph of
Section 1, between the words "concrete" and IIshall be"
from a comma to a semi-colon. The President restated
'rrustee Willer's motion to amend Resoluti'n 24-57 and
the Clerk called the roll, with the following response:
Ayes: All; Nays: None, whereupon the President declared
the motion carried.
December 3~ 1957
/ ~)] C""'
L.~ "i :..(
-,-_L <:J
The President then put the question on the adoptio
of Resolution 24-57 and the Clerk called the roll, with
the following response: Ayes: All; Nays: None, whereupon
the President declared the motion carried and Resolution
24-57 adopted.
President Lams requested that Trustee Casterline's
Committee investigate the advisability of installing add
i tional lighting over the intersection 0 f Busse Avenue
and Main Street. He stated that the existence of
inadequate lighting is particularly noticeable on Friday
nights and is a hazard to the police officer, directing
traffic at that location.
"'~,~~
Trustee Willer read Proposed Ordinance No. 585,
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING DANCING, FLOOR SHOWS, OR
ENTERTAINlIi[ENT OF ANY TYPE ON ALL PRENISES FOR WHICH
A CLASS A LICENSE HAS BEEN ISSUED. A motion was made
by Trustee Willer and seconded by Trustee Broad that
Ordinance No. 585 be passed. The President put the
question and the Clerk called the roll, with the
following response: Ayes: All; Nays: None, whereupon
the President declared the motion carried and Ordinance
No. 585 passed and approved.
"""\.A\
'., "l0-
r ,....~""'"
'_/
-'
.-.....
~
Trustee Willer requested that the Village Manager
be directed to send a copy of Ordinance No. 585 to all
3 holders of Class A licenses, within the Village of
Mount Prospect.
'I'rustee Willer then read the following communica ti,
November 29, 1957
Village President and Board
of Trustees
Mount Prospect, Illinois
Gentlemen:
The Plan Commission has examined the plat of
Anderson's Subdivision referred to it by the Village
Board for study and recommendation.
It is recommended that the proposed plat be
approved by the Village Board subject to the receipt
of a check payable to School District No. 56 in the
amount of ~lOOO.OO in lieu of land dedication. This
re commen da ti on i s made wi t h the und er standi ng tha t th e
subdivider will place a certified check in escrow with
the Village and the Village will enter into an agreement
with the subdivider that the check is not to be turned
over to School District No. 56 until the plat has been
accepted by the County and recorded.
The acceptance and recording of the plat is to
be accomplished within 90 days and if not, the signed
plat is to be returned to the Village and the check to
the Subdivider.
Respectfully submitted,
S/ A. C. Dresser, Chairm~~
S/ H. G. Appleby, Secretary
Trustee Willer then read the following letter:
December 2, 1957
Village of Mount Prospect
112 E. Northwest Highway
Nount Prospect, Illinois
Attention: Mr. H. G. Appleby, Village Manager
Gentlemen:
\.Ale are enclosing herev.li th our certified check in the
tlecemeer 3, 1957
1,\ -"1 Ii J
ql i}
amount of #l,OOO which is being tendered in accordance
with the agreement we discussed with you today. We
have referred to our Legal Department your reference
to the third paragraph, and it is their feeling that
the phraseology is appropriate.
One of the considerations in agreeing to make payment
to the School District was that the plat would be
approved without delay by the Village, and we are
anticipating that it will be signed and made available
to us by Wednesday, the 4th. If you can accornmodate
us in this respect, we would also like to pick up the
oriQinal and t\.J'o signed copies of the agreement at the
same time.. lrJill you also please sign the ori ginal copy
of the receipt covering the check.
Yours truly,
THE PlmE OIL COMPA1~
SjB;. p.. Burke, Jr.
Chicago Area Manager.
The following agreement was then read in its
entirety by Trustee Willer:
A G R E E MEN T
THIS AGR~EMENT, made and entered into by and between
1'he Pure Oil Company ~ hereinafter referred to a s "Pure
Oil," and the Village of Mount Prospect, hereinafter
referred to as the flVillage," WI TNESSETH:
WHEREAS, IlPure Oil" has submi tted a subdi vj.sion
pla t ti tled "Anderson I s Subdi vision" WId. ch pertains to
the northeast corner of Arlington Heights and Golf
Roads, Elk Grove 1'ownship, to the "Village II for appro val;
and
lnJHEREAS, trPure Oill! has offered to pay to the
nVillage" as a condition to such approval, a cash
contribution of One 'I'housand Dollars (~51,OOO.OO) for
the Forest View School District No. 56, which is to
be deposi ted wi th the "Village" subject to the terms
set out herein; and
WHEREAS, Said subdivision plat must legally be
approved and accepted by the Board of Comrnissioners
of the County of Cook before it becomes effective;
and
~lliEREAS, If subject subdivision plat is not
finally accepted by the Cook County Commissioners and
duly recorded, the One Thousand Dollars (~l,OOO.OO)
contribution above referred to is to be returned to
"Pure Oil,"
NOI'IT, 'l'HEREFORE, For and in consi deration of the
mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto
8.gree as follows:
1.. "Pure Oil" hereltJith deposits with the
"Village" a certified check for One Thousand
Dollars (~l,OOO.OO) payable to the above
mentioned School District, said check to be
held by the "Village" until the above referred
to subdiyision plat has been approved and
recorded by and in the County of Cook..
2. It is further understood that this
agreement shall run for a period of ninety
(90) days from the date hereof, and if at
the end of that time said subdivision plat
has not been made of record as above
described, said plat shall be returned by
"Pure Oil" to the "Village" for cancellation"
and said certified check returned by the
"Villagel! to "Pure Oil..lI
Dec. 3~ 1957
3. If, however, said subdivision plat
is duly recorded and accepted by the County
of Cook within said ninety (90) day period,
then "Pure Oil" by means of this agreement,
automatically authorizes the "Villagell to
deliver and tender said check to the above
mentioned Forest View School District No.
56 as a contribution to be made by "Pure Oil"
to said School District.
~4' 1:
1
Trustee Willer stated that the above agreement had
been revised somewhat from its original wording by
Village Attorney Lowning. It was moved by Trustee
Willer and seconded by Trustee Norris that the Board
concur with the recommendations of the Plan Co~mission
regarding Anderson1s Subdivision as stated in their
letter of November 29, 1957. The President put the
question and the Clerk called the roll, with the
following response: Ayes: All, Nays: None; whereupon
the President declared the motion carried.
e::r
It was moved by rl'rustee Will er and seconded by
Trustee Schlaver that the Village President and Village
Clerk be authorized to sign the above agreement on
behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect. The President
put the question and the Clerk called the roll, with
the following response: Ayes: All; Nays: None, whereupon
the President declared the motion carried.
':-'''j
(::
1"'~
-.""-
f:~
Trustee Willer read proposed Ordinance No. 586,
AN ORDINANCE SE1'TING FOR~j{ COLLECfnON CHARGES AN:G
PENALTIES PERTAINING 1D GARBAGE BILLS. It was moved
by Trustee, Willer and seconded by Trustee Schlaver
that Ordinance No. 586 be passed. The President put
the' question and the Clerk called the roll, with the
following response: Ayes: All; Nays: None, whereupon
the President declared the motion carried and Ordinance
No. 586 passed and approved.
Trustee Willer then read the following communicatic
November 29, 1957
Mr. Eugene Baughman
Evert Kincaid & Associates
22 W. Madison St.
Chicago, Illinois
Dear Mr. Baughman:
Confirming our telephone conversation of a
few days ago, the Village would like you to study
the proposal of annexing 18 1/2 acres between Foundry
Road and Rand Road between the filling station
etc. known as El Rando at the corner of Rand and
Foundry and Prospect Meadows.
The petitioner has requested that this area
be zoned for business. This attorney has, subsequent
to the petition and hearing hereon, suggested a strip
150 feet deep from Foundry Road to be zoned as R-3.
He proposes an extension of Russell Street 8 feet
wide through this 150 foot buffer strip.
It is believed that this matter will be held
in the Judiciary Committee until a report on it has
been received from you.
Sincerely yours,
s/ H. G. Appleby
Village J:vIanager
Trustee Willer then read the following letter:
December 3, 1957
, i
416)
Jc seph A. Weber
40B Hill Court
Prospect Heights, Ill.
November 29, 1957
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
Gentlemen:
The writer in conformance with your request and as
per your letter of November 27, 1957 promises to
pave that half portion of Lincoln Street which is
owned by me at the time you have all other property
owners concerned and adjacent to Lincoln Street
signed up to do the same. This agreement is valid
until Januar;<T 1, 1962.
Yours very truly,
sl Joseph A. Weber
Trustee Willer then read the following communication:
November 29, 1957
Mount Prospect Village Board
Municipal Building
ll2 E. Northwest Highway
Mount Prospect, Illinois
ATTENTION: Mr. H. G. Appleby
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your letter of November 20, 1957 I
enclose herewith an ordinance which we hope will meet
with your approval. I would appreciate it a great deal
if the Board could consider this matter at the earliest
possible meeting as we are very anxious to close the
sale of this property so that building may start.
There is also enclosed a letter from my client to the
Board in accordance with your request of November 27,
1957 which we hope will prove satisfactory.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
sf Joseph A. Weber
At the request of Trustee Willer, the ordinance
referred to in the above letter was referred to the
Village Attorney for h.t s consideration and recommendation.
Trustee Willer presented the original plat of
Frank Serafine I s Third Addition to JYlount Prospect.
It was moved by 'l'rusteeWiller and seconded by r:erustee
Casterline that the original plat of Frank Serafine's
Third Addition to Mount Prospect be referred to the
Plan Commission for study and recow~endation. The
Presioent put the question and the vote was taken by
acclamation, whereupon the President declared the
motion carried"
Mr. Clement V. Ward, Attorney, presented a
petition to the Board. President Lams read the
presented petition as follows:
December 3, 1957
41 if
NorrICE
AND
PETITION
TO 1'H:fi; PRESIDENT AND rI'BE
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF 1HE
VILLAGE OF J:vIT. PROSPECT,
Mte Prospect, Illinois
J:vIt. Prospect, Illinois
December 3, 1957
We, the undersigned, residents of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, and owners of property situated therein,
fronting on South Wille Street between Central Road
and Busse Avenue, fronting on Busse Avenue east of
SouthvJille Street and fronting on Northwest Highway
and Busse Avenue, hereby place your Honorable Board
on Notice of our objections to the proposed "CENTRAL
BUSINESS DIS1'RIC l' PLAN."
That our objections thereto are as follows:
~.?ti
Objection #One: The Hount Prospect Plan Commissio:
in preparing and recommending to the Village B08~d of
the Village of Mt. Prospect, the adoption by ordinanc
o:f the proposed "CENTRAL BUSINESS DI STRIC T PLANll
exceeded the authori ty delegated to it under Article
53-2 of Chapte:(' 24 of the Illinois Revised St.atutes,
in that, in said Plan said Commission prescribed a
method or methods of vacating streets. The only powe:
that the Mte rrospect Plan Corrrrnission has are delegat,
to it in the aforesaid statute. No provision of said
statute gives the Plan Commission any authority to
prescribe a method of vacating streets. The. State
Legislature delegated that authority to the .President
and Board of Trustees of the Village of 1V1t. .Prospect
under Article 69-11 Chapter 24 of the Illinois Revise(
Statutes and laid down the conditions under which and
the method s by whi ch streets may be vacated and the
Village Board must abide by the terms of. that statute
and the decisions interpreting same. By virtue of
the Plan Commission's assumption of power not delegatE
to it, the whole plan fai Is :for want of authori ty. L
by any conceivable interpretation, the Plan Commissiol
could be considered as having such authority then the
method they prescribe for vacating certain streets is
unconstitutional as it is a delegation of Legislative
Authority to private individuals and contrary to
Article 4, Section I of the Constitution of the State
of Illinois as decided by the Illinois Supreme Court
in the case of Chicago Dryer Co. vs. City of Chicago
reported at 413 Ill. 3l5.
..."'/"-..
'-,
~
.~
C~
Objection :f/Two The lVlt. Prospect Plan Commission
is preparing and recommending to the Village Board of
the Village of Nt. Prospect, for adoption by ordinancE
of the propos ed 11 CEN'l'RAL BUSINESS DI S'I'RI C T PLANIl failE
to consider the fact that the Village of MteProspect
has a valid comprehensive over-all Village Plan,
effective since September 7, 1~~3, as amended on two
occasions in accordance with Paragraph (3) Article
53-2 Chapter 24 of the Ill1.nois Revised Statutes whiC}:
plan applies to all geographical sections and all
functional parts of the incorporated Village of Mount
Prospect, including all annexed portions, regardless
of whethpr zoned for business use or residential use,
or used for business purposes, all property zoned for
business use, as well as all other propertYe Despite
the existing over-all plan and the statutory
restrictions on amendment of same, the I"lt. Prospect
Plan Commission submitted the proposed lICENTRAL
BUSINESS DIS'I'RI CT PLAN." 1'he statutory restriction
referred to is Paragraph (3) Article 53-2 Chapter 24
of the Illinois Revised Statutes, the provisions
of wt~ich read as follows: "To prepare and recommend
to the corporate authorities from time to time, plans
for sued_fie improvements in pursuance of the officTaJ
plan." Pursuance as defined in Webster's New Collegiai
Dictionary as "Chiefly, a carrying out or into effect.
December 3, 1957
j ..;1 8' t
41
That definition applied to the word pursuance in
the statute would mean such recormuendations as
would carry out or put into effect the official
plan then in force.
elf
Objection #1hree: 1he Powfs of a Plan
Commission of Villages within a radius of 30 miles
from the corporate limits of municipalities of
500,000 inhabitants or over for redevelopment as
set forth in Paragraph (2) Article 52-2 Chapter 24
of the Illinois Revised Statutes, are only applicable
to Plan Cow..missions of Villages with apo:)ulation
over 25,000 who have created Housing, Redevelopment,
Slloo Clearance, or Blighted Area Authorities pursuant
to Chapter 67 1/2 of the Illinois Revised Statutes"
Objection 1fFour: 1'hat the Plan Commission's
proposed l1CEN1'RAL '\USINESS DIS'I'RIC'I' PLAN" is not a
plan, as the word Plan is generally understood, but
constitutes and is designated a Redevelopment Plan
w~ich the Plan Commission of the Village of Mt.
Prospect is powerless to reco~~end by reason of the
fact that the corporate authorities of the Village
of Mt. Prospect, due to the number of inhabitants, has
no authority to create housing, Slum Clearance, or
Blighted Area Authorities as provided in Chapter 67 12/2
of the Illinois Revised Statutes.
W'HERr~FORE, your Peti tioners pray that your
Honorable Board refrain from adopting the proposed
Ordinance amending the existing Official Village
Plan until the Plan Commission submits a Plan in
compliance with the terms of the original Official
Village Plan in force since 1943 and within the
legal limitations prescribed in Paragraphs (l)
(2) (3) and (4) of Article 53-2 Chapter 24 of the
Illinois Revised Statutes entitled, IIPowers of Plan
Comn:ission".
S/ Fred Lamz 9 S. Wille St.
Christina LamB 9 S itJille St.
.
Louise "[",rille 15 S. Wille St.
:Henry J. Harz 1-:<' S" Wille St.
-'
Luella Gerner l7 S. Wille St.
Charles lVIecklenburg 2 S. Wille St.
Alma Mecklenburg 2 S. Wille St.
Irene Holste 3 S. Will e St.
Henry Holste,Jr. 3 S. vliille St.
Fred l~ille 26 w. Busse Ave.
Emilie A. Wille 26 w. Busse Ave.
Adolph "wille 2 N. Wille St.
Velda l",rille 2 N. t-Jille St..
Herman F. J.vleyn 21 S. Maple S
t.
01r. ~Jard stated tha t the petitioners, whom he
represented, were primarily concerned with future
action by the Village Board and the manner in which
their property rights might be impaired. fTrustee
"!tJiller inquired of Mr. Ward if the property O1-vners,
represented by him, were contemplating litigation.
Mr. Ward stated that his clients were not opposed to
a Central Business District Plan, but were simply
concerned over the impairment of their property
rights. Trustee Willer stated that the Village has
grown considerably since the approval of the Village
Plan of 1943 and that the call for servi ce from the
people of J.vlount Prospect will continue to be as great
as in the past. He stated the belief that the opposition
presented by the property owners represented by Nr. Ward
considerably decreased the chances of the Central Business
District Plan of being a complete success.
J.vlr. Carl Sun.dberg of the Chamber of Comrn.erce s ta ted
tbat he would endeavor to secure representation of the
Chamber of Comn~el~ce at the next meeting of the Board of
11rustees on I)ecember lO, 1957.
December 3~ 1955
~'t>/l
"y""
.~. :!;>o'
r"-~
".........j
i\.~:t
<1:
i~~"'I
~.~
...,.,,"""'~"'""""',....~.""""""~-~~~
J4- 1 Q
M ~~u
. .Ir. G. Mokate, of 109 N. Elmhurst Avenue, speak-
lng from the floor, stated that the pUblic is sometirr
unable to understand legal terminology used ati30ard
meetings and also having difficulty in hearing the
proceedings.
There being no further action to come before the
Board, it was moved by Trustee Broad and seconded by
Trustee Norris that the meeting be adjourned. 1~~
Pre~ictent put the que stioI;',anCl. tbEit vo 1;e was t~ken by
acclamation, whereupon the President declared the
motion. c~rried and the meeting regularly adjourned at
1 0 : lOP .1VI.
zU~ #. /~
William H. Keith
Village Clerk
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF 'I'HE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
1'RUS~PEES HELD IN THE rlUNICIPAL
BUILDING, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
ON TUESDAY, DECEM~ER 10, 1957.
'I'he meeting was called to order at 8: 36 P ..f'.1. by
President Lams and the Clerk was then directed to call
the roll.
On roll call, the fo1lo\ving 1'rustees answered
IIPresent": Airey, Broad, Casterline, Schlaver and
Willer. Absent: Trustee Norris.
All Trustees having previously received copies
of the minutes of a meeting held December 3, 1957, a
motion was made by Trustee Airey and seconded by
T'rustee Casterline that the minutes be approved as
submitted. The President put the question and the
Clerk called the roll, with the following response:
Ayes: All; Nays: None, whereupon the President
declared the motion carried and said minutes approved
as submitted.
President Lams referred to Proposed Ordinance No
587 AN ORDINANCE ADOP1'ING 'I'HE PROPOSED CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT PLAN AS A PART OF THE OFFICIAL PLAN
OF 'IRE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT. President Lams then
requested comments from the floor.
Mr. 1homas Ackerman, acting as spokesman for the
Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Chamber of
Commerce believes a Central Business Plan a necessity
to prevent sprawling unregulated gro~th of the
Business District. He said the Village would benefit
by the resulting revenue which would be lost to the
Village if shoppers were forced to go elsewhere.
Mr. Clement Ward, Attorney, representing a
group of ci tizens opposed to the Central Business
District Plan as outlined in the Kincaid Report,
stated his belief that the Chamber of Commerce should
proceed according to Illinois Statute. He termed the
present plan a redevelopment plan and stated his
belief that it cannot be legally carried out. Mr.
Ward saia that he was strongly in favor of redevelop-
ing any part of the Village that can be developed
according to the original Village Plan and in
accordance with Illinois Statute.
Mr. G. Mokate, Secretary of the Northwest Home
Owners' League, advanced the opinion that 75% of the
residents of Mount Prospect are not acquainted with thE
contents of the Kincaid Report. He further stated
his belief that most residents are unhappy with preseni
Slopping facilities and requested the Board to have Mr.
December 10, 1957
. , """"""'1='OI!'~~;.ml!:!ill~:t~;l>;!Il!I"".G'm!",*~.".,.'_"""" ''''''' ......