Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW Agenda Packet 11/08/2005 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA Meeting Location: Village Board Room, Mount Prospect Village Hall 50 South Emerson Street Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday, November 8, 2005 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL Mayor Irvana K. Wilks Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee John Korn Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Michaele Skowron Trustee Michael Zadel II. ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF OCTOBER 25, 2005 III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD IV. 2006 BUDGET DISCUSSION Opening Remarks - Irvana K. Wilks, Mayor Budget Overview - Michael Janonis, Village Manager Police Department - Richard Eddington, Police Chief Fire Department - Michael Figolah, Fire Chief Village Administration - Michael Janonis, Village Manager Finance Department and Non-Departmental - Finance Director David Erb Finance Commission Comments Village Board Deliberations V. ANY OTHER BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT Closed Session Property Acquisition 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (5). "The purchase or lease of real property for the use of the public body." ***For those wishing to call in with questions or comments during the Budget Hearing, please dial 1/847/870-5689.*** NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO A TTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODA TlON TO PARTlCIPA TE, SHOULD CONTACT THE VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 50 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056, 847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327, TDD #847/392-6064. Minutes Committee of the Whole October 25, 2005 I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Mayor Irvana Wilks. Present at the meeting were: Trustees Timothy Corcoran, Paul Hoefert, A. John Korn, Richard Lohrstorfer, Michaele Skowron, and Michael Zade!. Staff members present included: Village Manager Michael Janonis, Finance Director David Erb, Deputy Finance Director Carol Widmer, Public Works Director Glen Andler, Deputy Public Works Director Sean Dorsey, Community Development Director Bill Cooney, Deputy Community Development Director Ellen Divita, Human Services Director Nancy Morgan, Deputy Human Services Director Jan Abernethy, Water Superintendent Matt Overeem, Administrative Superintendent Jason Leib, Village Engineer Jeff WUlbecker, Forestry Superintendent Sandy Clark, and Vehicle Superintendent Jim Guenther. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approval of Minutes from the meeting of October 11, 2005. A motion was made by Trustee Korn and seconded by Trustee Zadel to approve the minutes. The minutes were approved. III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Former Mayor Gerald Farley introduced Dr. Terry and Renee Quinn to the Village Board. The Quinns are visiting Mount Prospect from our Sister City, Sevre, France. IV. 2006 BUDGET DISCUSSION Opening Remarks Mayor Wilks began her remarks by stating the budgets for the last several years were caretaker budgets due to the economy. Mayor Wilks stated that due to an upturn in the economy the 2006 budget will reflect several pent up service demands that had been put off for the last few years. Mayor Wilks also encouraged residents to communicate their thoughts on the proposed budget with the Village Board through e-mail, telephone calls and faxes. Budget Overview Village Manager Mike Janonis began his opening remarks by stating that the Village will meet the 2005 budget expenditure targets even with the cost of the recent drought and the increased gasoline prices. Mr. Janonis advised that the proposed 2006 Budget does not include the addition of an Environmental Health Inspector and that a separate calculation showing the effect of the $60,000 additional cost on the General Fund had been distributed. Mr. Janonis remarked that in previous years staff usually presents a balanced budget to the Village Board unless a planned drawdown of fund balance is anticipated. However, the 2006 Proposed Budget has been presented with a $1,111,179 deficit in the General Fund. The deficit includes the last planned transfer of $350,000 for the Village Hall construction, $650,000 in new staffing requests, and miscellaneous expenditures. Finance Director David Erb presented an overview of the 2006 Proposed Budget. The Village's operating budget is $51,170,969 out of a total budget of $80,306,320. Of that amount 44.5% is for Public Safety, 40.2% for Public Works, 8.0% for Administration, 4.5% for Community Development and the balance is made up of other expenditures. Mr. Erb pointed out that the General Fund revenues are estimated at $34,885,912 and expenditures are expected to be $35,997,091 leaving the projected deficit of $1,111,179. 1 Community Development Community Development Director Bill Cooney began his remarks by reviewing some of the department's 2005 accomplishments. These included preparing a community profile, demographics and an available sites database for business recruitment and assisting in the coordination and implementation of additional redevelopment efforts within the Village's downtown area. In 2006 Community Development expects to update the comprehensive land use plan and focus efforts on the remaining redevelopment parcels within the Village's downtown area. The 2006 Proposed Budget of $1,846,595 is 10% higher then the 2005 budget. That increase is due to the request for the Environmental Health Inspector and a request for $10,000 to fund a new nuisance abatement program. The budget also includes an increase of $6,750 for elevator inspections that will be offset with an increase in the fees businesses pay for the inspections. Mr. Cooney said that a new software program called "Black Bear" will be up and running on January 1, 2006. This program will allow staff to record and track building permits much more efficiently. Trustee Hoefert asked if this program would allow residents to track their permits through the approval process. Mr. Cooney stated that the current program does not have that feature but that it might be possible to purchase additional software for that purpose. Human Services Human Services Director Nancy Morgan began her presentation with a brief overview of the Human Services Department. The department spends the majority of time on social services and nursing/health services and a small amount of time on senior activities. The majority of the populations served are geriatrics, immigrants and at-risk youth. In 2005 the Department assisted in the implementation of an agreement between five townships for a new State sponsored transportation pilot program which allows residents affordable transportation in crossing township boundaries and accessing Cook County and Veteran's Hospital. Another achievement was the assistance provided senior citizen residents in understanding Medicare Part D, the new Medicare law dealing with prescription coverage that will go into effect in 2006. The Proposed 2006 Budget is $731,373 or $10,840 over the 2005 Budget. This represents a 1.5% increase. In addition in 2006 the Department expects to generate $80,925 in revenues from such items as home delivered meals, flu shots and other revenue from operating the Community Center. Public Works Public Works Director Glen Andler reviewed some of the 2005 accomplishments of the Public Works Department. Among those he mentioned were the 5.3 miles of street resurfacing in year 9 of the street resurfacing program, implementation of Phase 1 of the multi-year combined sewer rehabilitation program, and the successful completion of a new 1 O-year refuse collection contract with Arc Disposal Company. The Public Works Department's Proposed 2006 Budget is $21,996,160 which is a 6.78% increase over the 2005 Budget. Of that amount $4,333,538 is budgeted for capital improvements and $534,180 for vehicle replacement. Mr. Andler also mentioned that the amount budgeted for the Vehicle Maintenance Fund reflects an increase of 66% increase in the cost of fuel. In 2005 $183,320 was budgeted and in 2006 it is estimated that $304,500 will be spent. Some of the expenditures proposed for 2006 include booster station 4 rehabilitation of $200,000, $1 million for year 2 of the combined sewer improvement project, $2,650,000 for year 10 of the street resurfacing program, and $250,000 to dredge retention pond #3 in the Kensington Business Center. Finance Commission Comments Chuck Bennett, Chairman of the Finance Commission, addressed the Village Board. Mr. Bennett complimented staff on an excellent budget document. He stated that the Finance Commission wants to wait until the Police and Fire Departments have presented their budgets before making any recommendations. He 2 said the Finance Commission will be looking at revenue enhancements and will be back before the Village Board with their recommendations. V. ANY OTHER BUSINESS Mayor Wilks announced that there will be a TIF Meeting on Wednesday, October 26 at 7:00 p.m. She also announced that the Village had a dedication ceremony on behalf of Velma Lowe, the former Village Clerk in the afternoon. A tree at Village Hall was dedicated to the memory of Mrs. Lowe who passed away in June. VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:10p.m. to go into closed session regarding property acquisition. The meeting reconvened into open session at 9:50 p.m. and immediately adjourned at 9:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~JJJL. t yU~JjlJ Carol L. Widmer Deputy Finance Director 3 Director Glen R. Andler Deputy Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 AGENDA MOUNT PROSPECT SOLID WASTE COMMISSION November 8. 2005 CONFERENCE ROOM B, PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD 7:30 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES . September 15, 2005 III. CITIZEN FORUM IV. SOLID WASTE PROGRAMS/DATA V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS . Discussion of new "Watch Your Waste" handbook . Status of contract negotiations with ARC VII. NEXT MEETING VIII. ADJOURNMENT ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE PLEASE CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS AT 847.870.5640, TDD 847.392.1235. Phone 847/870-5640 Fax 847/253-9377 www.mountprospect.org Mount Prospect Director Glen R. Andler ~ Deputy Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Mount Prospect Solid Waste Commission September 15, 2005 Meeting Minutes Call to Order Chairman Luteri called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. Present Chairman George Luteri Commissioner Rod Mobus Commissioner Pankaj Parikh Commissioner Ken Westlake Staff Liaison Jason Leib Director of Public Works Glen Andler Absent Commissioner Mary Rosen Commissioner Mary Winkler Approval of Minutes Minutes from the March 17,2005 meeting were approved as written. Citizen Forum No residents were in attendance to address the Commission. Solid Waste Proarams and Data Single Family SelVice Chairman Luteri asked if the new row homes across from the library on Emerson were going to have dumpsters or curbside pickup. Director of Public Works Glen Andler informed the Commission that the row homes would have curbside pickup in the alley behind the future row homes. Multi Family SelVice The Commission had questions concerning refuse and recycling service for the new Emerson multi use project at the corner of Emerson and Busse. Mr. Andler informed the commission that a compactor was going to be installed that would service The Emerson and the current Lofts building. Old Business No old business was discussed. New Business Since the last commission meeting March 17,2004 the Village started negotiations and reached a tentative agreement for a new solid waste services contract with ARC Disposal and Recycling. Mr. Andler provided a synopsis of the new unlimited wheeled cart program. A discussion ensued concerning the specifics of the new program. General comments from the Commission included the following: . Damage to carts from everyday use should be replaced at no cost to the residents. . Commission members agreed that the lower rate for the yard waste subscription service was good and should increase the use of the subscription service. . Several members stated that the wheel carts are not cumbersome and that elderly residents should be able to use the smaller cart with no problem. . The Commission discussed the disposal of old garbage cans and recycling bins. The old garbage cans are contaminated and thus may not be recycled. Staff informed the board that they would look into the best way of disposing of old garbage cans and recycling bins. . Several Commissioners suggested the Village sell yard waste bags instead of the yard waste sticker. The Commission agreed that the yard waste sticker was a better system since a number of residents use garbage cans to dispose of yard waste material. Mr. Glen Andler informed the Commission that direct billing residents for refuse service was an option that the Village Board was considering. The Commission discussed the pros and cons of implementing direct billing for solid waste services. Commission members noted that residents have complained in the past that refuse costs were based on a homes value and not actually on the amount of refuse generated. Commission members suggested pricing based on the size of the cart. Mr. Andler responded by saying it is hard to charge different rates when the program is unlimited. The Commission raised questions concerning individuals that refuse to pay for refuse service. Staff informed the commission that they would have to look into the issue and would have an answer at the next commission meeting. Mr. Andler informed the Commission that the Village is currently negotiating with ARC for a commercial solid waste contract. Mr. Andler provided a brief description of the program, but could not discuss exact details because of ongoing contract negotiations. Next Meeting A next meeting date was not decided upon. Adiournment As there was no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. MAYOR Irvana K. Wilks VILLAGE MANAGER Michael E. Janonis TRUSTEES Timothy J. Corcoran Paul Wm. Hoefert A. John Korn Richard M. Lohrstorfer Michaele Skowron Michael A. Zadel Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 VILLAGE CLERK M. Lisa Angell Phone: 847/818-5328 Fax: 847/818-5329 TDD: 847/392-6064 AGENDA MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING LOCATION: Mount Prospect Village Hall 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 MEETING DATE & TIME: Thursday November 10,2005 7:30 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 27,2005 P&Z MEETING . PZ-39-05 /222 S. Edward Street / Bush Residence / Variation III. OLD BUSINESS None IV. NEW BUSINESS A. PZ-37-05 /309 Westgate Road/ Plat of Resubdivision (create 2 lots of record). NOTE: This case is Village Board Final. B. PZ-41-05/ 1705 Verde Drive / Variation (Front Yard Setback - porch). NOTE: This case is Village Board Final. C. PZ-42-05 / 605 Oriole Lane / Lawson Residence / Conditional Use (porch). NOTE: This case is Planning & Zoning Final. V. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS . PZ-32-05 /90 E. Milburn Ave. - Village Board approved a Variation to allow an oversized driveway width (as was constructed), but denied the Variation request for the exterior side yard setback for the patio (November 181). . PZ-39-05 /222 S. Edward St. - 1 sl reading is November 15. VI. ADJOURNMENT Any individual who would like to attend this meeting, but because of a disability needs some accommodation to participate, should contact the Community Development Department at 50 S. Emerson, Mount Prospect, IL 60056, 847-392-6000, Ext. 5328, TDD #847-392-6064. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-39-05 Hearing Date: October 27,2005 PETITIONERS: Amy and Joseph Bush PUBLICATION DATE: October 12, 2005 REQUEST: Variation (Unenclosed porch in exterior side yard) MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Arlene Juracek Joseph Donnelly Mar1ys Haaland Ronald Roberts Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist MEMBERS ABSENT: Leo Floros STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Jill Baty, Planning Intern Judith Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Stacey Dunn, Community Development Secretary INTERESTED PARTIES: Amy & Joseph Bush and Tom Lindsey Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Richard Rogers moved to approve the minutes, as corrected, of the September 22, 2005 meeting and Ronald Roberts seconded the motion. The motion was approved 6-0. Chairperson Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-39-05, a Variation request for an unenclosed porch. She said that the case is Village Board final and the Commission will be making the recommending vote tonight. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, summarized the case. She said that the Subject Property is located at the northwest intersection of Edward Street and Milburn Avenue, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. The Subject Property has a typical rectangular shape, but has a slightly substandard lot width of 49.98 feet when current code requires 50 feet. The existing home is currently set back approximately 30 feet from the front lot line, 4.9 feet from the side lot line, 16.98 feet from the exterior lot line, and approximately 65 feet from the rear lot line. Ms. Connolly said that the Petitioner's exhibits illustrate a significant addition to the eXIstmg house. Improvements include constructing a second story addition and an unenclosed porch in the exterior side yard. A portion of the existing house already encroaches into the required exterior side yard and has a setback of 16.98 feet. This is a 'nonconformity' because current code regulations require a 20-foot setback. Portions of the proposed second story will encroach into the side yards. However, the Zoning Ordinance includes provisions that allow for nonconformities to be expanded in the side and rear yards as long as the addition follows the established setback and the lot is 55 feet or less in width. Therefore, the second story complies with current zoning regulations. Ms. Connolly reported that the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot exterior side yard for new construction and the porch and unenclosed covered entryway would have a 16-foot setback and 14-foot setback respectively. Therefore, the Petitioner is seeking a Variation for this part of the project. The entryway measures 12 feet across Arlene Juracek, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 27,2005 PZ-39-05 Page 2 and extends 3 feet from the house. It is not a permitted encroachment because the l2-foot linear measurement exceeds the definition of a stoop, which is limited to 5 feet x 8 feet. Ms. Connolly stated that the existing home does not comply with the Village's zoning regulations because the house encroaches into the required exterior side yard. However, the existing structure is a legal nonconformity and is allowed to remain in its current locations. The proposed unenclosed porch and entryway require relief from the RA District's bulk regulations for the exterior side yard setback. The project would be constructed according to all applicable Village Codes. Ms. Connolly summarized the standards for a Variation listed in the Zoning Ordinance. She said that the Zoning Ordinance requires a 20-foot exterior side yard for the house. However, the existing structure does not meet this requirement and the Petitioner would like to construct an unenclosed porch and an unenclosed entryway in the required setback, creating a l6-foot setback and a l4-foot setback respectively. Staff conducted a site inspection and found that several homes on comer lots in the vicinity of the Subject Property also encroach into the 20-foot exterior side yard. Using internal Village software, Staff found measured the existing setbacks and found that the Petitioner's request was in keeping with several existing setbacks. Ms. Connolly said the Petitioner is proposing to expand the existing home to create additional living space. The Petitioner explored different designs for the addition, but determined that an unenclosed porch is integral to the design and objective of unifying the addition and the existing house. However, there are challenges when a majority of the house is currently at the required 20-foot exterior setback and a portion of the house already encroaches into the exterior side yard. Ms. Connolly reported that the Petitioner evaluated the possibility of modifying the portion of the house that already encroaches into the exterior side yard, but determined it was cost prohibitive. In addition, the proposed unenclosed entryway that ties the proposed 'two porches' together is necessary for a cohesive design. The unenclosed entryway's measurements, projecting 3 feet from the building and 12 linear feet across are necessary to comply with Building Code regulations and to balance aesthetics as it mirrors the size of the existing encroachment. However, it is this part of the project that triggers Village Board approval because this structure will encroach more than 25% into the required exterior side yard, resulting in a 14-foot exterior side yard. Ms. Connolly stated that, while the proposed encroachment is comparable to the existing 16.98 foot exterior side yard and other setbacks currently found in the neighborhood, the request fails to meet the standards for a Variation because there is no hardship as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. She said that this comer lot is typical in shape of most lots in the Village and the substandard lot width is less than one inch than the current minimum lot width requirement. Ms. Connolly said that although the Petitioner's request to have an unenclosed porch and entryway encroach into the exterior side yard may be an attractive enhancement to the house that has a minimal impact on the neighborhood, the request does not meet the Variation standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on this, Staff recommends that the P&Z deny the motion to approve a Variation to allow a l4-foot to l6-foot exterior side yard as shown on the Petitioner's site plan for the residence at 222 S. Edward Street, Case No. PZ-39-05. She said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case because the amount of the Variation exceeds 25% of the Zoning Ordinance requirement. Chairperson Juracek asked for clarification on the request: She said that the proposed porch in the exterior side yard, resulting in a 16-foot setback, requires Variation approval as well as the entryway that encroaches in the side yard, creating a 14-foot setback requires Variation approval. Ms. Connolly verified this was correct. Joseph Donnelly inquired why this case did not meet the Conditional Use criteria and needed a Variation. Ms. Connolly clarified that the proposed entry way is actually in the exterior side yard of the property and the Conditional Use is only applicable to porches in the front yard. Arlene Juracek, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 27, 2005 PZ-39-05 Page 3 Richard Rogers asked whether the new garage met the 20-foot setback. Ms. Connolly said that the permit was approved with a 20-foot setback, but didn't know whether a final inspection had been done. Mr. Rogers then asked for clarification that if the proposed entry way was located in the front yard, a 30-foot set back would be required versus the 20-foot set back required for the external side yard. Ms. Connolly said that was correct. Tom Lindsay of Lindsay Associates Architects, 1155 Waukegan Road, Glenview IL and Petitioners Amy and Joseph Bush, 222 S. Edward were sworn in. Mr. Lindsay introduced the Property Owners, Amy and Joseph Bush. He said that Joseph Bush is acting as the contractor for the project and will be living in this home with his family when it is complete. Mr. Lindsay said that the Staff presentation was very thorough and that it described the request very well. He added that the request has not only aesthetic purpose, but serves as an asset to the neighborhood. He said he would answer questions from the Commissioners. Chairperson Juracek questioned the drawing of two porches extending beyond the front wall of the house. She asked if this required a separate Variation, or if this request is a Variation for both setbacks. Ms. Connolly indicated that this request is for a 14-foot and 16-foot setback as shown the Petitioner's site plan. If the request does get approved, Staff wanted to ensure the entire porch could not be built with a 14-foot setback. Therefore, the request was broken down to separate the porch from the entryway. Richard Rogers asked if this plan, as drawn, is actually three porches. Mr. Lindsay verified that there are three areas of porch that will be tied together under one roof. Mr. Rogers noted that the aesthetics of the plan are a great improvement to the property. Chairperson Juracek asked if consideration had been given to putting the front door in a different place so the porch may be fully accessed by one means of entry. Mr. Lindsay indicated that the location of the front door, as drawn, is the ideal placement for the entry. Keith Youngquist asked whether the porch could be enclosed later on if the Variation request was granted. Ms. Connolly replied that the Variation can be approved with the condition that the porch remains unenclosed. Mr. Lindsay said that the Petitioners have no intention of enclosing or screening in the porch. Mr. Lindsay summarized that the proposed architecture of the porch offers value to the property and the neighborhood. Chairperson Juracek added that the porch will preserve the character of the house and benefit the neighborhood. Richard Rogers again asked the Property Owner to confirm exterior side yard of the new garage. Mr. Bush said that the garage does meet the 20- foot set back requirement. Chairperson Juracek asked if there were any further questions. Hearing none, the hearing was closed at 7:55 pm. Joseph Donnelly made a motion to approve the proposed unenclosed porch in the side yard as submitted by the Petitioner for the residence at 222 S. Edward Street, Case No. PZ-39-05 with the condition that the porch remains unenclosed. Richard Rogers seconded the motion. Arlene Juracek, Chair Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 27,2005 PZ-39-05 Page 4 UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Donnelly, Haaland, Roberts, Rogers, Youngquist, and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 6-0. Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn at 8:04 pm, seconded by Joseph Donnelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Stacey Dunn, Community Development Secretary C:\Documcnts and Seuings\kdewis\Local Scuings\Tcmporary Internet Filcs\0LK2\PZ-39..Q5 222 S. Edward.doc Village of Mount Prospect 1 12 E. Northwest Highway Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 BOARD OF FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSIONERS Phone 847/870-5656 MEETING NOTICE DATE: LOCATION: November 8, 2005, Tuesday Police & Fire Headquarters 112 E. Northwest Highway Fire Department Conference Room, 2nd Floor 6:00 p.m. TIME: AGENDA I. Approval of Minutes . October 4, 2005 II. Closed Session · Approval of Minutes, October 4, 2005 . Personnel III. Police Department · Review of Sergeants List · Police Department Update IV. Discussion on Police Department Oral Interview Questions V. Update on Recruitment Plan VI. Fire Department Update VII. Correspondence VIII. Other Business MOUNT PROSPECT BOARD OF FIRE & POLICE COMMISSIONERS 1/ / 3 /t.lS," Date VILLAGE CLERK NOTIFIED BY: A~Ce--...",.. 1:;I'-tJ~Q::J 11(1 J C1S:/ Date: POSTED BY: ~~"o .,/t7{Jfr //_~ ~ ' Date ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND TIDS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE SHOULD CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AT 112 E. NORTHWEST IDGHWAY, MOUNT PROSPECT. 847870-5656. TDD 847 392-1269