HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. NEW BUSINESS 8/2/05
Mouru Prospect
~
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
~b. ~T"~
81z.1~
FROM:
PROJECT ENGINEER
DATE:
JULY 28, 2005
SUBJECT:
MAPLE STREET PARKING STUDY
The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to
prohibit stopping, standing and parking along the east side of Maple Street between
Council Trail and Moehling Drive and along both sides of Moehling Drive for the
entire jurisdiction.
The 500 block of S. Maple Street is a north-south local street near Lions Park. It is an asphalt street that
is 26.5' wide (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The block is only 300' long with a cul-de-sac at the north
end. It has six properties that front the street. There are currently No Stopping, Standing, Parking 8am-
4pm School Days signs posted along the east side of the block. These signs were posted in 2001 to
address on-street parking issues associated with drop-off and pick-up at Lions Park Elementary School.
Moehling Drive, an east-west dead end street connected to Maple Street has No Parking Any Time signs
posted on both sides of the street because of the limited right-of-way and narrow pavement. It has two
properties that front the street.
The petition submitted to the Village requested the Engineering Division address the parking problem
along the 500 block of S. Maple Street as well as Moehling Drive during baseball season. According to
the petition, vehicles park on both sides of the street making access difficult for residents and raising a
safety concern as children often walk between cars. Residents have also complained about the baseball
visitors littering on the lawns and the potential for emergency vehicles unable to travel on the street.
According to the Mount Prospect Park District, the baseball season runs from April to July. There are
two fields at the park. The west field is near Maple Street and the east field is near School Street.
Practices and games are scheduled for every evening during the week and throughout the day on
Saturdays. The number of teams this year has almost doubled which has increased the number of
practices and games at Lions Park. The fact that the residents must now contend with visitor parking each
night of the week may have contributed to them bringing their concerns to the Village now.
During the evenings and weekends, most of the available on-street parking along the 500 block of S.
Maple Street is occupied by baseball visitors. There are typically 6-8 vehicles parked on each side of the
street. This leaves approximately 10' for thru traffic, enough for only one lane of traffic. This situation
also makes it difficult for residents to back out and pull in their driveways.
Beyond the 500 block of S. Maple Street, a few cars associated with the baseball games at the west field
have been seen parked along the 400 block of S. Maple Street, Council Trail and within the school lot.
Page 2 of2
Maple Street Parking Study
July 28, 2005
The park district did pass out leaflets to parents asking them to be more courteous when parking in the
neighborhood and making them aware of available parking in the school lot. A recent visit, however, still
showed cars parked on both sides of Maple Street.
Some of the residents affected by this study attended a recent park district meeting and voiced their
concerns. The committee members appeared to by sympathetic to their concerns and agreed to take steps
to change parents' behavior.
Staff sent out surveys to the eight properties along Maple Street and Moehling Drive to get their opinions
on this issue. Five surveys were returned. All five expressed concern with the current situation. Issues
over emergency response, children safety, driveway access, blocking hydrants, noise, littering and
trespassing were all expressed to the Village.
The issue was discussed at the July 11, 2005 Safety Commission Meeting. Six residents were in the
audience to speak on this issue. They all favored stricter parking restrictions to alleviate the parking
congestion on Maple Street and Moehling Drive. They asked that any changes be made now rather than
waiting until the next baseball season. After some discussion, the Safety Commission agreed to change
the parking restrictions.
By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends the following changes to the
Village Code:
. repeal the No Stopping, Standing, Parking 8am-4pm School Days designation
along the east side of Maple Street between Council Trail and Moehling Drive
(Section 18.2009)
. repeal the No Parking Any Time designation along both sides of Moehling Drive
for the entire jurisdiction (Section 18.2006)
. add a No Stopping, Standing, Parking Any Time designation along the east side of
Maple Street between Council Trail and Moehling Drive (Section 18.2005)
. add a No Stopping, Standing, Parking Any Time designation along both sides of
Moehling Drive for the entire jurisdiction (Section 18.2005)
Please include this item on the August 2nd Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety
Commission Minutes from the meeting as well as a location map for your reference.
ft'-
Matthew P. Lawrie
cc: Director of Public Works Glen Andler
Village Clerk Lisa Angell
x: \engineering1traffic\safecomm Irecs& min \july05rec.doc
MAPLE STREET PARKING5TUDY
t
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT . .
,. ;:j~/~j!J~~;:,~;~';~;f,r:;f"h\#t~Yl~)i);~,f1:~;:,~~'<,{t-0_::'I~)''''-' ;. .
- EXISTING NO PARKING ANY TIME
- EXISTING NO STOPPING, STANDING, PARKING
8AM-4PM SCHOOL DAYS
- SAFETY COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION FOR
NO STOPPING, STANDING, PARKING ANY TIME
LIONS MEMORIAL PARK
E SHA BONEE TRL MOUNT PROSPECT
PARK DISTRICT
BASEBALL FIELD
508
~,1OEHUNG DR
510
.- I") l1) i'- LIONS PARK
516 0 0 0 0
N N N N ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
I-
(I)
.....
..J
a..
<(
:::E
(I)
co 0 0 N ~ r.o
0 .- 0 0 0 0
N N N N
E COUNCIL TRL
l1)
o
.-
r---
o
.-
O'l
o
.-
.-
o
N
600
I-
(I)
:::E
..J
.....
(I)
601
600
Director
Glen R. Andler
Deputy Director
Sean P. Dorsey
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60()56~2229
The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was (;alled to order at 7:25 p.m. on
Monday, Julyll, 2005. . ..
There was no one in attendance that spoke on an issue not on the agenda.
Phone 847/870-5640
Fa" 847/253..9377
www.rnountprospect.org
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
A) MAPLE STREET PARKING STUDY
1) Background Information
The petitioner's request is to address the parking problem along the 500 block of S. Maple Street
during baseball season. Vehicles park on both sides of the street making access difficult for
residents and raising a safety concern as children often walk between cars. Residents have also
complained about the baseball visitors littering on the lawns and the potential for emergency
vehicles unable to travel on the street.
The 500 block of S. Maple Street is a north-south local street near Lions Park. It is an asphalt
street that is 26.5' wide (back-of-curb to back-of-curb). The block is only 300' long with a cul-
de-sac at the north end. It has six properties that front the street.
There are currently No Stopping, Standing, Parking 8am-4pm School Days signs posted along
the east side of the block. These signs were posted in 2001 to address on-street parking issues
associated with drop-off and pick-up at Lions Park Elementary School. Moehling Drive, an east-
west dead end street connected to Maple Street has No Parking Any Time signs posted on both
sides of the street because of the limited right-of-way and narrow pavement.
According to the Mount Prospect Park District, the baseball season runs from April to July.
There are two fields at the park. The west field is near Maple Street and the east field is near
School Street. Practices and games are scheduled for every evening during the week and
throughout the day on Saturdays and Sundays. The number of teams this year has almost
doubled which has increased the number of practices and games at Lions Park. The fact that the
residents must now contend with visitor parking each night of the week may have contributed to
them bringing their concerns to the Village now.
During the evenings and weekends, most of the available on-street parking is occupied by
baseball visitors. There are typically 6-8 vehicles parked on each side of Maple Street. This
leaves approximately 10' for thru traffic, enough for only one lane of traffic. This situation also
makes it difficult for residents to back out and pull in their driveways. From an emergency
response standpoint, the Village's fire trucks are 8' wide. There would be adequate room (while
tight) to access a home in the event of an emergency even with cars parked on both sides of the
street.
Beyond the 500 block of S. Maple Street, a few cars associated with the baseball g~mes at the
west field have been seen parked along the 400 block of S. Maple Street, Council Trail and
within the school lot. The park district did pass out leaflets to parents asking them to be more
courteous when parking in the neighborhood and making them aware of available parking in the
school lot. A recent visit, however, still showed cars parked on both sides of Maple Street.
Some of the residents affected by this study attended a recent park district meeting and voiced
their concerns. The committee members appeared to by sympathetic to their concerns and agreed
to take steps to change parents' behavior.
Phon,-,
~':~;~- ,:'
r:"{'~'},;,\' ,
2) Recommendation
Since this is a public street, any change in the current parking restriction must affect all potential
users, including the residents. A No Baseball Parking sign would be unenforceable. Attempting
to restrict parking during baseball season along with the parking restrictions already in place for
may lead to confusion and would be more difficult to manage. To be consistent and
a parking restriction for one side of the street at all times would be Staff s preference.
also address any future changes by the park district such as a softball league, fall
or other events.
since baseball season is almost over, a more restrictive parking ordinance is only going
the residents for the next nine months. Until next April, making no change will seem to
the residents. And before the next season begins, distributing leaflets to the parents and
. encouraging them to park in the lot (rather than simply saying it's available) may help
the situation. It may also help to have a portable sign displayed at the corner of Maple Street and
Trail directing baseball visitors to the lot to reduce on-street parking in the
This would have to be coordinated with the park district. If, after these steps are
and the parking problem continues, changing the parking restrictions would then be
as a final solution.
the Engineering Staffs review of this issue, the Village Traffic Engineer recommends
no change to the parking restrictions along Maple Street at this time
with the park. district to be more pro-active in getting baseball visitors to park in the
lot once baseball seasol1 begins in April 2006
the parking situation at the beginning of the next baseball season
problem continues, prohibit stopping, standing and parking on the east side of Maple
between Moehling Drive and Council Trail at all times.
516 S. Maple Street, described the parking problem to the Commission. He said
situation has made it difficult for residents to get in and out of their driveways.
Radtke, 205 E. Moehling Drive, expressed a concern with children safety because of kids
between the cars during baseball games. He also was concerned an emergency vehicle
because of the parking situation.
201 E. MoehlingDrive,has noticed anincre~se. in games and traffic this season. It
inconvenient to access his driveway and to have guests park near his house.
201 E. Moehling Drive, shared some pictures with the Commission showing the
problems during baseball games. She shared her experience at a recent baseball
meeting. Unfortunately, she said the parking problems have continued.
Voight, 510 S. Maple Street, supported the observations made by his neighbors.
Phone
Frank Pantell, 508 S. Maple Street, explained that it is difficult to access his driveway because of
the parking congestion along the street.
Chairman Bencic asked Traffic Engineer Lawrie to present the report to the Safety Commission.
Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided an overview of Staffs study of the issue.
Chairman Bencic noted that he visited the site and saw how narrow the street canbecome with
cars parked on both sides of the street. He supported the parking restriction change but wanted
the residents' input on whether to implement the changes now or next year.
Sally Cohon responded that she would like to see the signs installed immediately. Others said
the same.
Commissioner Keane questioned whether the signs could restrict parking between April 1 and
August I only. Since there are already restrictions associated with the school, Chairman Bencic
commented that it could be lead to confusion and would be difficult to enforce. for the Police
pepartment.
The;e was some general discussion about the need to enforce the signs and issue tickets rather
than finding the owners and asking them to move their car.
Sally Cohon said that some parents park along Moehling Drive where there are No Parking Any
Time signs and wait in their car. She suggested that parents not be allowed to do that so that
residents can access their driveways.
Trfl[fi.c Engineer Lawrie mentioned to the Commission that if they were to address the parking
issue on Moehling Drive, a new ordinance would be needed to change the No Parking Any Time
signs to No Stopping, Standing, Parking Any Time signs.
C:()I1p1.1issioner Keane, seconded by Commissioner Tortorello, moved to approve installing
Stopping, Standing, Parking Any Time signs along the east side of Maple Street between Council
Trail and Moehling Drive and along both sides of Moehling Drive between Maple Streefand its
terminus.
The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0.
issues brought up for discussion.
no business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 6-0 to adjourn at 8:05
of Commissioner Tortorello. Commissioner Keane seconded the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
,____ A A);J ~
-~~
Matthew P. Lawrie, P.E.
Traffic Engineer
x:\engineering\traffic\safecomm\recs&min\july05min.doc
e,:} //.;:,?{):-Gi5,'t.O
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SAFETY CDMMISBIDNMEETINI3
mla
07/27/05
ml
07/27/05
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE'
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2009 of "SCHEDULE IX - Parking During School Hours"
of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended
by deleting the following:
"Name of Street
Maple Street
Side of Street
East
Description
Between Council Trail
and Moehling Drive"
SECTION TWO: That Section 18.2006 of "SCHEDULE VI - NO PARKING ANY TIME" of Chapter
18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the
following:
"Name of Street
Moehling Drive
Side of Street
North and South
Description
Entire jurisdiction"
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED
Irvana K. Wilks, Village President
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk
H:ICLKOIfilesIWINIORDINANCICh 18, D.elete no parking maplemoehlingaug2005.doc
b
mla
7/27/05
ml
7/27/05
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED
'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2005 of "SCHEDULE V - NO STOPPING,
STANDING, OR PARKING" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding, in alphabetical
sequence, the following:
"Name of Street
Maple Street
Side of Street
East
Description
Between Council Trail
and Moehling Drive
Moehling Drive
North and South
Entire jurisdiction"
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED
Irvana K. Wilks
Village President
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\C LKO\files\ WIN\ORDINANC\CH 18, No parkingmaplemoeh/ingaugust2005.doc
.---
L
"
mla
07/27/05
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
815 AND 901 SOUTH EDGEWOOD LANE
WHEREAS, applicant, Larry McKone, has received approval from appropriate
Village of Mount Prospect departments, to construct new single-family homes
on the Subject Property, located at 815 and 901 South Edgewood Lane; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 16 (Development Code) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect requires installation of sidewalks in conjunction with the development
of property; and
WHEREAS, in certain instances the installation of public improvements,
including but not limited to sidewalks, is not feasible at the time of development,
however the developer is required to provide those improvements as such time
as the Village, Cook County, or Illinois Department of Transportation deems
appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees have determined that the best
interests of the Village would be served by having the developer enter into a
Restrictive Covenant, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a
part hereof as Exhibit "A", guaranteeing the installation of specified
improvements at such a time as deemed reasonable and proper.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE. The Mayor and Board of Trustees do hereby authorize
execution of a Restrictive Covenant, a copy of which Restrictive Covenant is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", for property
commonly known as 815 and 901 South Edgewood Lane, which Restrictive
Covenant guarantees the installation of public improvements in the form of
sidewalks at such time as deemed necessary.
F
815 and 901 South Edgewood Lane
Page 2/2
SECTION TWO' The Village Clerk is hereby directed to record with the
Recorder of Deeds, a fully executed copy of the Agreement being the subject of
this Resolution.
SECTION THREE: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED
Irvana K. Wilks
Mayor
ATTEST:
M. Lisa Angell
Village Clerk
H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RES\Restrictive Cov ,815and90 1 edgewoodaugust2005.doc
,
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT BYAN})B~t~~ENIII~YILLAqEQF~9UNT
PROSPECT, ILLINOIS AND THE OWNER-DEVELOPER OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
WITHIN SAID VILLAGE REGARDING COMPLETION OF REQUIRED PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF SAID PROPERTY
815 S. Edgewood and 901 S. E6gewobd, Mt. Prospect,IL
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 15 entitled "Development" of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois certain public improvements are required to be constructed and
installed by owners and developers of property within the Village, as part of the approval for the
development of such property; and
WHEREAS, the schedule for accomplishing the construction and installation of such public
improvements by the owner-developer of the property under development is often in conflict
with other public improvement projects adjacent to or in the vicinity of the property so as to
render the accompl ishment of such public improvements by the owner-developer to be
practically or economically unfeasible until the project can be combined with or scheduled so as
to confonn with other public improvements affecting the subject property under development;
and
WHEREAS, such other public improvement projects are administered by the Village,
County or State, officials over which the owner-developer has no control, and in some instances
those improvements to be accomplished by the owner-developer with respect to the property
under development cannot be completed until the other improvements under Village, County or
State control have been accomplished; and
WHEREAS, under such circumstances, it is deemed to be inequitable to delay development
of the property under development or to require the o\vner-developer to establish a cash escrow,
letter of credit or improvement bond for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of required
public improvements due to the delay caused by the intervening or subsequent accomplishment
of other public improvement projects under administration and control of the Village. County or
State: and
WHEREAS, Chapter 15 of the Village Code off\,fount Prospect, Illinois provides that in lieu
of a cash escrow, letter of credit or development bond, the owner-developer may execute a
restrictive covenant to be recorded and to run with the land as a guarantee that the required
public improvements shall be completed with respect to the property under development.
WHEREAS, the Village finds that it be in the best interests of the Village to accept a
covenant to construct streetlights cur b s , gut t e r s sid e wa 1 k.m the future.
NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the provisions of the said Chapter 15 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, the Undersigned Owner does hereby covenant with the Village
of Mount Prospect, an Illinois municipal corporation, as follows:
I. The Undersigned is the Owner of the following described property within the Village of
Mount Prospect, Illinois, to wit: (~ETTYS BURG ON EDGEWOOD .
Bein~ a resubdivision of lo~ 25 in Bus~e Country Estates belng
a sugdivision of the west 2) acres of that part of the west 1/2
of the northwest 1/4"of section 14, township 41 north, range 11
east of the third principal meridian lying north of Seegers Rd in Cook
2. A plan of development of the described property by the Undersigned has been approved Co u n t y , I L .
by the Village of Mount Prospect, which approval includes the completion of the following
public improvements contained in and provided as a part of the plans, to wit:
The payment for the installation of streetlights c ~ r. b s .,g u t t e r s , sid e.wa 1 k ~salong
815 S.Edgewood & 901 S. Edg.ewo'od. installed and constructed to Village
Code.
3. For a period of twenty (20) years commencing from the date of this Restrictive
Covenant, the Undersigned shall undertake the above-stated improvements within sixty (60) days
after being advised by the Village of Mount Prospect to commence such construction and
installation work. The work shall continue without interruption Or delay, until the improvements
are completed in a satisfactory manner and in accordance with Village, County, and State plans
and specifications.
4. This Covenant to complete public improvements shall run with the subject property for
twenty (20) years. Nothing in the Covenant shall in any way prevent the alienation or sale of all
or a portion of the subject property, except that the sale shall be subject to the provisions of this
Restrictive Covenant and to the plan of development pertaining to the property. The new owner
shall be both benefited and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed of this
Restrictive Covenant. .
5. This Covenant shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their
successors and assigns in title and interest. The provisions shall be enforceable in a proceeding
at law or in equity against the person or persons seeking to violate it including an action for
injunctive relief, specific performance or to recover damages or other fines and penalties as may
be established in such violation. In the event that the O\lwner-developer of the subject property
fails to complete the required improvements or pay a proportionate share of the required
improvements by other contractors within the specified time periods, the value of such
improvements shall be entered as a lien against the property due and payable within sixty (60)
days after notification to proceed with the improvements.
tN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this
of ,20
day
~~,e-
o R
~
;-?lleJ 1iJ.~-iA
OWNER
ILLINOIS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
,.t~
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
~b.~~
All. C>~
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JULY 6, 2005
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT - 12/31/04
PURPOSE:
To present the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended December
31,2004.
BACKGROUND:
Each year the Village retains a CPA firm to audit the Village's financials and assist in the
preparation of the annual CAFR. Sikich Gardner & Co, LLP performed the audit for the Village for
fiscal year ended December 31,2004.
DISCUSSION:
The CAFR presents two kinds of financial statements, each with a different snapshot of Village
finances. The statement's focus is on both the Village as a whole (government-wide) and on the
major individual funds. Both perspectives allow the user to address relevant questions, broaden a
basis for comparison from year-to-year at the Village and also between governments and enhance
the Village's accountability.
Sikich Gardner has given its audit of the Village for year-end 2004 an "unqualified opinion". This
means that their examination found our financial statements to be fairly presented and prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Their opinion can be found on pages 1
and 2 in the financial section of the report.
A detailed overview of the financial results for the fiscal year is provided in the Management's
Discussion and Analysis (MD & A), which may be found immediately following the auditor opinion
on page 3 of the financial section. Following are a few of the more significant highlights:
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
July 6, 2005
Page 2
General Fund: General Fund revenues of $31,437,412 fell short of the final budget by $310,534 or
0.98%. The following table shows the variance from final budget for revenues broken down by
major revenue category.
Revenue Type Final Budget Actual $ Variance % Variance
Property Taxes $ 8,164,528 $ 7,965,530 $ (198,998) (2.44%)
Other Taxes 5,024,100 5,189,856 165,756 3.30%
Licenses & Permits 2,814,750 2,798,930 (15,820) (0.56%)
Intergovernmental 13,791,677 13,672,588 (119,089) (0.86%)
Service Charges 806,863 749,216 (57,647) (7.14%)
Fines & Forfeits 582,000 554,741 (27,259) (4.68%)
Investment Earnings 47,500 45,869 (1,631) (3.43%)
Miscellaneous 516,528 460,682 (55,846) (10.81 %)
Total Revenue $ 31,747,946 $ 31,437,412 $ (310,534) (0.98%)
Property tax revenues were down $198,998 from the final budget. The amount collected by the
County and remitted to the Village came in at 96.9% of the original levy. This is slightly below the
average collection ratio of 97.6% for the Village in the past five years.
Revenue classified as Other Taxes exceeded the final budget by $165,756, or 3.30%. The surplus
over budget can be attributed mostly to the telecommunication tax and food and beverage tax,
which exceeded their budgets $81,308 and $55,486 respectively. The remaining revenues in this
category had minor variances plus or minus budget. The real estate transfer tax continues to
remain strong generating a positive variance of $316,018 above the original budget amount.
Intergovernmental revenues fell short $119,089 or 0.86% from the $13,672,588 final budget
amount. The original budget was increased by $158,477 for adjustments to various revenue line
items. Although state income taxes fell slightly short of its final budget amount, the tax came in
significantly higher than the original budget by $222,390. The income tax has been trending up for
the past two years, but still lags below 2002 levels. Receipts from sales taxes were down $185,831
or 2.28% from the final budget. The state use tax and corporate personal property replacement tax,
both state shared revenues, exceeded the final budget by $80,417 and $43,948 respectively.
Intergovernmental revenues are projected to grow slowly over the next fiscal year. This is a
pleasant change from the decline attributed to state shared revenues the Village has experienced
over the past several years.
Fines and forfeits fell short of the final budget by $27,259 or 4.68%. Local fines fell short by
$76,314 while the remaining revenues in this category exceeded the final budget by $49,055.
Investment earnings continue to suffer from the low interest rates continuing to be offered in the
marketplace. This combined with the intentional draw down of fund balance and budget shortfalls
caused investment earnings to come in $1,631 or 3.43% below the final budget projection. Although
this amount appears minor, this revenue projection has been revised downward over the past
several years. At its high point, interest income generated in excess of $300,000.
,f
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
July 6, 2005
Page 3
General Fund expenditures totaled $31,835,052, representing a positive variance of $210,664, or
0.66%, under the revised 2004 Budget. The following table presents a breakdown of actual
expenditures as compared to the final budget for each department.
$ Variance % Variance
Positive/ Positive/
Department Final Budget Actual (N egative) (Negative)
Public Representation $ 110,074 $ 108,884 $ 1,190 1.08%
Village Manager 2,058,753 2,101,737 (42,984) (2.09%)
Television Services 170,262 161,903 8,359 4.91%
Village Clerk 163,256 163,656 (400) (0.25%)
Finance 1,368,331 1,351,088 17,243 1.26%
Community Development 1,583,296 1,481,617 101,679 6.42%
Human Services 784,867 702,815 82,052 10.45%
Police 11,373,788 11,356,202 17,586 0.15%
Fire 8,886,140 8,866,769 19,371 0.22%
Public Works 5,207,593 5,212,118 (4,525) (0.09%)
Other 339,356 328,263 11,093 3.27%
Total Expenditures $ 32,045,716 $ 31,835,052 $ 210,664 0.66%
The results from operations of the General Fund are showing a deficit in 2004. Expenditures
exceeded revenues by $397,640. In addition, a transfer of$270,000 was made to cover a portion of
the debt service for the new Village Hall. Fund balance totaling $667,640 was used to cover the
combined shortfall. The original budget called for a planned drawdown of $362,116. Fund balance
as of December 31,2004 was $8,257,514. Unreserved fund balance at year-end was $8,037,820,
representing 23.7% of budgeted operating expenditures for 2005. Revenue from the sale of right-
of-way earmarked to cover the transfer to debt service ($270,000) did not come in as expected, but
will instead be credited in 2005. This caused a temporary drop in fund balance. Including these
monies would raise fund balance to $8,322,820 or 24.5%.
Special Revenue Funds: In total, the special revenue funds are showing a deficit with
expenditures exceeding revenues by $737,348. There was an intentional draw down of fund
balance in the Motor Fuel Tax Fund in the amount of $575,075 for the completion of carry-over
projects from 2003. In addition, the Refuse Fund expenditures exceeded revenues by $189,200
due to the inclusion of the leaf removal program. Fund balances for these two special revenue
funds remain strong at 48% and 55% respectively. Fund balance for all special revenue funds total
$2,943,955 at year-end.
Debt Service Funds: The various debt service funds are showing a combined operating deficit of
$753,281 for the year, on revenues and other financing sources of $5,172,153 and expenditures of
$5,925,434. Shortfalls in the home-rule sales tax accounted for much of the deficit. Fund balance
for all the debt service funds totaled $36,785 at December 31,2004.
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
July 6, 2005
Page 4
Capital Projects Funds: Expenditures exceeded revenues and other financing sources by
$8,949,026 in 2004. Planned expenditures for property acquisition, downtown redevelopment, street
improvements, and construction of the new village hall occurred during 2004 that had intentionally
drawn down fund balance. The year-end fund balance was $1,982,531.
Water and Sewer Fund: This fund is showing a net deficit $445,282 on revenues of $7,956,614
and expenses of $8,401,896. The net income figure includes depreciation expense of $452,769
and excludes $101,000 of bond principal payments.
Pension Trust Funds: The net assets ofthe Police andFir~fighter pension funds increased during
2004. The Police Pension Fund is showing an increase of $2,095,894 in net plan assets, while the
Firefighters Pension Fund is showing an increase of $1 ,617,553. According to the December 31,
2003 actuarial report, the most recent information available, the Police Pension Fund was 77.45%
funded and the Firefighters Pension Fund was 78.84% funded.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the
fiscal year ended December 31,2004.
/J~,t-~-'f-/ {/. C~/
DAVID O. ERB
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Copy: Finance Commission
DOE/
H:\ACCT\AUDIT\2004 Audit\Correspondence\Board Memo - 12-31-04 CAFR.doc
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
DATE: JULY 6,2005
SUBJECT: SINGLE AUDIT ACT COMPLIANCE -12/31/04
PURPOSE:
To present the Single Audit Compliance Report for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004.
BACKGROUND:
Each year as part of the annual financial audit, the Village engages a CPA firm to undertake a
compliance audit of the Village's federal and state grant receipts pursuant to the U.S. Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133. This is commonly referred to as the Single
Audit Act. Sikich Gardner & Co. LLP performed the Single Audit for the fiscal year ended
December 31,2004.
DISCUSSION:
As you can see on pages 3 and 6 of the Single Audit Report, the auditors are reporting that the
Village complied with the Single Audit Act for 2004.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board accept the Single Audit Compliance Report for the fiscal
year ended December 31,2004.
Ja<-<~c/. 0:_
DAVID o. ERB
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Copy: Finance Commission
DOE!
H:IACCT\AUDIT\2004 Audit\Single Audit\Memo to Manager - 2004.doc
Mount Prospect
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
FROM:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
'l:>'b.~""
el2- O~
TO:
DATE:
JULY 6, 2005
SUBJECT: TIF COMPLIANCE AUDIT -12/31/04
PURPOSE:
To present the Report on Compliance with Public Act 85-1142 for the fiscal year ended
December 31,2004.
BACKGROUND:
Each year as part of the annual financial audit, the Village engages a CPA firm to undertake a
compliance audit of our tax increment financing activities. Sikich Gardner & Co. performed the
TIF compliance audit for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004.
DISCUSSION:
On page three of the TIF audit is the Report of Independent Accountant's on Compliance. In this
report, the auditors indicate that the Village has complied with the requirements of the Tax
Increment Redevelopment Allocation Act (P.A. 85-1142). Page two lists the combining schedule of
revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balance for the 2004 fiscal year and the Statistical
Section on pages four-six list the summary of activity and schedule of fund balance from the
inception of the TIF through 2004. The combining schedule and summary includes both the
Downtown Redevelopment Construction Fund as well as the debt service funds used to support TIF
redevelopment.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board accept the Report on Compliance with Public Act 85-1142
for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004.
~(/' .. /-'}7
ad.~4:~? .
avid O. Erb
Director of Finance
t:~.
Copy: Finance Commission
DOEI
H:\ACCT\AUDIT\2004 Audit\Correspondence\TIF Compliance Audit Transmittal.doc
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Mount Prospect
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
FROM:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~. ~\~
e\~ oS"
DATE:
JULY 6, 2005
SUBJECT: AUDITOR'S MANAGEMENT LETTER -12/31/04
PURPOSE:
To present the Auditor's Management Letter for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004.
BACKGROUND:
Auditing Standards require auditors to present a management letter to the governing
boards of entities they have audited. The purpose of the letter is to inform the board of
any problems they encountered during the audit, and to report any deficiencies in
internal controls uncovered during the course of the audit.
DISCUSSION:
Attached is the Management Letter prepared by Sikich Gardner & Co. for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004.
Page two of the Management Letter reports on current year recommendations. There
were two recommendations for improvement presented. The first recommendation dealt
with "Marking to Market" investments. This is the practice of revaluing the equities held
in the pension portfolios to current market value. The Finance Department concurs with
this recommendation and as standard practice prepares Mark to Market adjustments
quarterly. The year-end adjustment for 2004 though had not been done until the
commencement of the audit in April. Procedures are in place to ensure future
adjustments are made in a more timely manner. The auditors also recommended the
Village establish a formal audit committee to oversee the audit and monitor the Village's
fraud risk assessment program. The Finance Department concurs with this
recommendation and has taken steps to establish a formal audit committee. It is
expected to be completed by the end of 2005.
There was one recommendation from the prior year that required follow-up. The
auditors noted consecutive years (2002 and 2003) where the Risk Management Fund
had significant claims that resulted in a reduction in net assets (fund balance). The
recommendation was to examine user fees charged to other funds that support
expenditures for the Risk Management Fund.
H:\ACCT\AUDIT\2004 Audit\Correspondence\Managment Letter Transmittal.doc
Management Letter
July 6, 2005
Page 2 of 2
In response, the Village noted that the high level of activity was unusual and not
expected to continue into the future. In addition, the Village now self-insures for a larger
portion of claims rather than purchasing conventional insurance. There will be an overall
savings to the Risk Management Fund by making this change.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the Village Board accept the auditor's Management Letter for the
fiscal year ended December 31,2004.
/' I} //J/
/~ (A: ..(." v/ (./ .
David 0, Erb
Director of Finance
~,
Copy: Finance Commission
DOE!
H:\ACCT\AUDIT\2004 Audit\Correspondence\Managment Letter Transmittal.doc
Mount Prospect
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
FROM:
VILLAGE BOARD AND FINANCE COMMISSION
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
~. ~l~
t\1. DS'"
TO:
DATE: JULY 22,2005
SUBJECT: 2006-2010 CIP - Revised
Attached hereto is the proposed 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The projects being
considered for the year 2006 total $9,232,038. The five-year total for all projects is $48,935,288.
We encourage you to read the Manager's transmittal letter beginning on page ii. This correspondence
describes the purpose of the CIP, highlights some of the more significant projects, and reviews project
funding. To help you evaluate our ability to fund the requested projects we have again provided five-year
financial forecasts for the major operating and capital project funds that provide funding for the CIP.
These forecasts can be found in Section H of the document.
In general, the projects being presented directly relate to the monies expected to be available. However,
from reviewing the CIP requests in conjunction with the five-year financial forecasts I would like to direct
your attention to several project areas.
General Fund Proiects
The CIP is showing the five-year average of projects being paid from General Fund revenues as
$422,000. This is higher than in previous years due to the inclusion of a single large project in 2008.
Streetlight improvements totaling $440,500 are budgeted for that year. Excluding this item, the five-year
average is $334,000. This is typical of the amount of capital projects funded by the General Fund on an
annual basis. Of greater concern is the five-year financial forecast for the General Fund. This forecast is
showing operating deficits beginning in 2006 ($975,376) with annual deficits increasing each year through
2010 ($5,565,391). See the complete five-year forecast for the General Fund beginning on page H-1.
Motor Fuel Tax Fund (MFT)
Receipts from motor fuel taxes for 2005 are expected to decline from 2004 and remain flat through 2006.
Due to this flattening of the motor fuel taxes, the Fund has annual deficits for every year of the forecast.
This will force a draw down on fund balance to where fund balance becomes negative in 2008. This is
significant as the MFT Fund supports approximately one-half of the funding for the annual street program.
Originally to be finished in 2005, the completion of the street program was pushed back to 2009 due to
budget constraints. Constant monitoring of this Fund will be necessary to ensure that the original street
resurfacing program started in 1995 is completed as planned.
Capital Improvement Fund
The Capital Improvement Fund is meant to support intermediate sized capital expenditures for various
departments that are non-recurring in nature. Some examples of these projects are Wireless
Connectivity, Phone System Upgrade and Detention Pond Improvements. Since the General Fund
discontinued the annual capital transfer, $2.2 million of these intermediate sized projects have been
deferred. In addition, the projects that have been funded, which are higher priority items, have drawn
2006-2010 CIP - Revised
July 22,2005
Page 2 of 3
down the fund balance to where it will become negative sometime in 2007. A new annual funding source
of approximately $750,000 is needed to support this capital program into the future.
Street Improvement Construction Fund Proiects
The forecast for the Street Improvement Fund (H-11) is showing a positive fund balance of $590,124 by
the end of 201 O. This is the result of debt service for street related projects being paid off in 2004 and the
projected completion in 2009 of the formal street program started in 1995. Moving forward beginning in
2010, there will be sufficient funding to support ongoing maintenance of the Village streets and also slowly
rebuild fund balance, which was intentionally drawn down as part of the Village Hall financing plan.
Flood Control Construction Fund Proiects
The forecast for the Flood Control Construction Fund (H-12) is showing a negative fund balance of
approximately $25,000 by the end of 2008. This is the result of some larger flood projects coming on line
in 2008. Fund balance by 2010 is expected to fall further to a negative $1.2 million if the Prospect
Meadows ($600,000) and McDonald Creek ($1,500,000) projects are completed as planned. A portion of
the ~ cent home rule sales tax, which supports flood control becomes available in 2010 to support
ongoing projects, but is not fully available until 2019 when all the IEPAloanobligations are paid off.
Water and Sewer Fund
There are several large capital projects included in the proposed CIP for 2006-2010 that significantly
impacts the Water and Sewer Fund as can be seen in the five-year financial forecast beginning on page
H-13. Operating deficits of between $465,000 and $2,100,000 are expected each year during the five-
year plan. This is due mostly to the combined sewer reconstruction project beginning in 2005. The entire
project is expected to cost $15,000,000. A comprehensive water rate study and other funding methods
are being researched to locate funding sources for the project. Based on the five-year projections, fund
balance will decrease over the next five years from a positive $3.5 million in 2005 to a negative $4.7
million by 2010.
Bond Proceeds
The proposed CIP is showing two new projects to be funded by bond proceeds. They are the
construction of a new Fire Station 14 at $2.0 million and the expansion of the Public Works vehicle
maintenance building at just under $1.0 million. Both projects are slated to begin in 2007. The CIP does
not address the tax increases that would be associated with issuing bonds for these projects.
CIP Revisions
Staff met with the Finance Commission and Village Board to review the proposed capital improvement
plan. Several revisions to projects were made as a result of the meetings.
1. SCBA Upgrade (0-8) originally slated for replacement in 2010 was moved up to 2006 due to the
availability of grant monies from FEMA. The total cost of the upgrade is $160,000. 80%, or
$128,000 will be covered by FEMA. The Village's portion, $32,000 will come out of the Capital
Improvement Fund.
2. Parking Lot Improvements (F-20) scheduled for 2006 included the Police & Fire Building deck
rehab ($80,000) and Public Works parking lot ($75,000). The total cost for these two projects
was $155,000. After a further analysis ofthe parking deck, the projected cost of this one project
is now $170,000. As a result, the public works parking lot has been deferred until 2007 . The cost
of the parking deck rehab will come out of the Capital Improvement Fund.
1:\CIP\2006-2010\CIP Cover Memo August 2005 - Final Board Memo.doc
2006-2010 CIP - Revised
July 22, 2005
Page 3 of 3
3. $200,000 is budgeted for Corridor Improvements (C-3) for 2006 in the proposed CIP. Corridor
Improvements enhance the appearance and commercial viability of commercial corridors in the
Village. For 2006, the CIP budget amount has been reduced to $50,000 with the focus being on
some of the smaller corridors in the Village. Corridor improvements are funded out of the Capital
Improvement Fund.
4. A portion of the monies budgeted for the corridor improvements have been reallocated to a new
project not included in the original Proposed CIP. $100,000 is being set aside in 2006 for a
Space Needs Study to analyze the proposed construction of a new Fire Station #14 as well as
the Public Works vehicle maintenance facility expansion and Police Administration. The new
space needs study will be funded out of the Capital Improvements Fund.
The revised total budget for the five-year CIP is $49,135,288. This is an increase of $200,000 from the
original budget. $128,000 in new revenue from FEMA grants is expected to cover most of the increase.
First-year projects being considered now total $9,437,038.
Revisions are currently in process for the final CIP document. The document is scheduled for distribution
to the Village Board, Finance Commission, and staff on August 5,2005. Please do not hesitate to contact
me with any questions regarding the CIP and its revisions. Thank you.
fi
/; ;;~.,
tLzz<-/(:7. ~
DAVID O. ERB
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Copy: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager
Dave Strahl, Assistant Village Manager
Carol L. Widmer, Deputy Finance Director
1:\CIP\2006-2010\CIP Cover Memo August 2005 - Final Board Memo.doc
VILLAGE OF )\10UNT PROSPECT
2006 - 2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Projects By Sources of Funds
Page Project
Project Name No. ~ 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
General Fund:
PC for New IT Staff Person (N) 0-2 80 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000
FD Additional Computers (N) 0-3 80 2,000 2,000 0 0 0 4,000
Backbone Upgrades (N) 0-6 80 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
Document Imaging Licensing (N) 0-9 80 12,000 5,000 0 0 0 17,000
GIS Application Development - IT (E) 0-10 80 15,000 16,000 0 0 0 31,000
Instruction PC for Training Room (N) 0-11 80 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000
Four-Post Server Rack (N) 0-12 80 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000
Desktop Management Solution (N) 0-14 80 0 9,000 0 0 0 9,000
Exchange Version Upgrade (N) 0-15 80 0 18,500 0 0 0 18,500
Intrusion Detection (N) 0-16 80 0 7,000 0 0 0 7,000
Sidewalk Cost Share Program (E) F-8 60 63,600 66,250 68,900 71,700 74,200 344,650
New Sidewalks (N) F-15 60 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 250,000
Streetlight Improvements 2 (E) F-19 60 10,000 20,000 440,500 35,000 40,000 545,500
KBC Jogging Path Rehab (N) F-23 60 0 150,000 160,000 0 0 310,000
Tree Planting Program (E) F-17 00 93,533 101,358 109,730 118,689 128,275 551,585
Subtotal - General Fund 252,133 435,108 829,130 285,389 312,475 2,114,235
Motor Fuel Tax Fund:
Kensington Improvements (N) F-ll 50 400,000 0 0 0 0 400,000
Bridge Rehabilitation (E) F-18 50 150,000 0 0 0 0 150,000
Traffic Signal Replacement (E) F-21 50 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Street Improvement Program (E) F-2 60 1,200,000 1,220,000 1,240,000 1,260,000 1,280,000 6,200,000
Subtotal- Motor Fuel Tax Fund 1,800,000 1,270,000 1,290,000 1,310,000 1,330,000 7,000,000
Capital Improvement Fund:
Centralized Backup (N) 0-7 80 20,000 25,000 0 0 0 45,000
PD-FD Network Rewiring (N) 0-8 80 25,000 0 0 0 0 25,000
Wireless Connectivity (N) 0-13 80 0 150,000 0 0 0 150,000
Financial Software/Hardware - FIN (N) 0-17 80 0 0 435,000 0 0 435,000
Desktop Operating System (E) 0-]8 80 0 0 0 100,000 0 100,000
Digital Mobile Video recorders (E) E-2 85 156,500 0 0 0 0 156,500
Prisoner Transport Van (N) E-3 85 56,000 0 0 0 0 56,000
Chair Replacement (N) E-5 85 42,000 0 0 0 0 42,000
Parking Enforcement Vehicle (N) E-6 85 0 30,000 0 0 0 30,000
Squad Cars (N) E-7 85 0 89,000 0 0 0 89,000
Firing Range Control System (N) E-8 85 0 42,000 0 0 0 42,000
Squad Cars - Additional (N) E-9 85 0 0 95,000 0 0 95,000
LiveScan Booking Station (N) E-4 90 60,000 0 0 0 0 60,000
Traffic Stop Data Collection (N) E-IO 90 0 0 75,000 0 0 75,000
Phone System Upgrade (N) B-2 90 35,000 275,000 0 0 0 310,000
Television Studio System (N) B-3 90 0 27,000 0 0 0 27,000
Video Conferencing System (N) B-4 90 0 134,000 0 0 0 134,000
Digital Cameras - Parking Deck (N) B-5 90 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000
Video Conferencing System (N) D-4 90 0 75,000 0 0 0 75,000
Breathing Air Compressor (N) D-5 90 0 0 0 45,000 0 45,000
Telemetry Radios (N) D-6 90 0 0 0 48,000 0 48,000
Training Facility (N) D-7 90 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000
A-tO
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2006 - 2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Projects By Sources of Funds
Page Project
Project Name No. ~ 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Capital Improvements Fund (cant.)
SCBA Upgrade (N) D-8 90 160,000 0 0 0 0 160,000
Fuel Island Rehab (N) F-30 90 0 0 0 J 50,000 0 150,000
Other Public Buildings (E) F-16 70 150,000 63,000 100,000 40,000 45,000 398,000
Parking Lot Improvements (N) F-20 70 170,000 75,000 0 0 0 245,000
Emergency Generator PW BJdg (N) F-25 70 0 375,000 0 0 0 375,000
Corridor Improvements (E) C-3 50 50,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 850,000
Wolf Road Improvements (N) F-22 50 72,000 0 0 205, no 205,720 483,440
Detention Pond Improvements (N) F-14 40 180,000 0 400,000 190,000 200,000 970,000
Traffic Improvements (N) F-12 00 255,000 255,000 255,000 255,000 255,000 1,275,000
Aerial Photogrammetry (N) F-28 00 0 300,000 0 0 0 300,000
Busse Road Improvements (N) F-29 60 0 0 750,000 0 0 750,000
Space Needs Study (N) B-6 70 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000
Subtotal - Capital Improvement Fund 1,531,500 2,140,000 2,310,000 1,283,720 905,720 8,170,940
Downtown Redevelopment
Construction Fund:
Streetscape Program (E) C-4 50 700,000 600,000 0 0 0 1,300,000
Downtown Redevelopment (E) C-2 00 80,000 80,000 80,000 0 0 240,000
Subtotal- DowntowlI Redevelopmellt
Constructioll FUlld 780,000 680,000 80,000 0 0 1,540,000
Street Improvemellt
Construction FUlld:
Street Improvement Program (E) F-2 60 1,500,000 1,732,000 1,783,000 1,834,000 1,377,000 8,226,000
Subtotal - Street Improvement
Construction FUlld 1,500,000 1,732,000 1,783,000 1,834,000 1,377,000 . 8,226,000
Flood COlltrol
COllstruction FUlld:
Detention Pond Improvements (N) F-14 40 35,000 0 0 0 0 35,000
Levee 37 (N) F-3 30 122,538 122,538 0 0 0 245,076
Flood Control Program (E) F-5 30 50,000 50,000 350,000 350,000 1,500,000 2,300,000
Subtotal- Flood COlltrol
COllstructioll Fund 207,538 172,538 350,000 350,000 1,500,000 2,580,076
Water & Sewer FUlld:
Hansen Software - PW (E) G-4 80 8,770 12,500 13,000 17,000 17,500 68,770
Laptop for PW Supervisor - PW (E) G-5 80 4,770 4,900 5,000 5,\00 5,200 24,970
Combined Sewer Improvements (N) F-4 40 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 8,500,000
Water Main Replacement (E) F-9 10 450,000 500,000 340,000 350,000 400,000 2,040,000
Water Tank Rehabilitation (E) F-IO 10 200,000 50,000 500,000 275,000 300,000 1,325,000
DBP/2 Rule Compliance (N) F-13 10 79,000 79,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 308,000
Water System - Video Security (N) F-24 10 0 210,000 0 0 0 2\0,000
Stand-By Pump Power Supply (E) F-26 10 0 375,000 400,000 410,000 0 1,185,000
Leak Detection Equipment (N) F-27 10 0 72,000 0 0 0 72,000
A-II
Project Name
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
2006 - 2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS
Projects By Sources of Funds
Page Project
No. ~ 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
F-6 20 ] 10,000 ] 25,000 0 0 0 235,000
F-7 20 315,000 330,000 355,000 385,000 405,000 ],790,000
3,167,540 3,758,400 3,]63,000 2,992,]00 2,677,700 15,758,740
F-20 70 80,000 0 65,000 0 0 145,000
80,000 0 65,000 0 0 ]45,000
D-2 70 0 2,005,000 0 0 0 2,005,000
D-3 70 0 947,520 0 0 0 947,520
0 2,952,520 0 0 0 2,952,520
Water & Sewer Fund (cant.)
Sanitary Sewer Monitoring (N)
Sewer Main Rehabilitation (E)
Subtotal- Water & Sewer Fund
Village Parking System Fund:
Parking Lot Improvements (N)
Subtotal- Village Parking
System Fund
Bond Proceeds:
New Fire Station ]4 (N)
Public Works Expansion (N)
Subtotal - Bond Proceeds
DonationslConuibutionsjrom
Residents/Developers:
Sidewalk Cost Share Program (E)
Tree Planting Program (E)
F-8
F-17
60
00
Subtotal - Contributions
56,400 58,750 6],100 63,300 65,800 305,350
61,927 64,985 68,256 71,757 75,502 342,427
1 ]8,327 123,735 129,356 135,057 ]4],302 647,777
9,437,038 13,264,30] 9,999,486 8,]90,266 8,244,197 49,135,288
4,071,538 7,669,558 3,835,000 2,553,720 2,280,720 20,4] 0,536
5,365,500 5,594,743 6,] 64,486 5,636,546 5,963,477 28,724,752
9,437,038 13,264,301 9,999,486 8,]90,266 8,244,] 97 49,135,288
Total - All Sources
New Projects (N)
Established Projects (E)
Total- All Projects
(N) = New Project
(E) = Established Project
Project Type Codes:
]0 = Water System
20 = Sanitary Sewer
30 = Flood Control Projects
40 = Storm Sewer
50 = Street Construction and Reconstruction
60 = Resurfacing/Curbs and Gutters/Sidewalks
70 = Construction of and Improvements to Public Buildings
80 = Computer Hardware/Software
85 = Vehicles and Automotive Equipment
90 = Non-Automotive Equipment
00 = Miscellaneous
A-12