Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6. NEW BUSINESS 6/7/05 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department Mount Prospect MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ;3b,' ~-r&, " 'l,D$'" FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 3, 2005 SUBJECT: PZ-17 -05 - VARIA nONS (REBUILD DETACHED GARAGE) 548 IDA COURT VINCENT & JUDY ALTOBELLI - APPLICANTS The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-17-05, a request to rebuild a detached garage, that requires Variations for setbacks, lot coverage, and driveway width. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their May 26, 2005 meeting. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, reviewed the case. She said that the Subject Property is located north of Dempster Street, between Linneman Road and Elmhurst Road, and contains a multi-family residence (3 flat) with related improvements. The site was originally developed under Cook County regulations and the site does not comply with current Village Codes. The Petitioner would like to demolish the existing garage because it was damaged in a fire. Since the entire garage would be demolished, the structure no longer retains its legal nonconforming status and it must be rebuilt according to current zoning regulations. This requires obtaining Variations for the location of the garage, the amount of lot coverage (existing condition), and the driveway width (existing condition). The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the Petitioner's request in detail. They noted that the 'oversized' driveway was needed to accommodate the. tenants' cars because there are parking restrictions on Ida Court. In addition, the Subject Property is adjacent to a soccer field and the garage's existing location does not adversely impact the adjacent properties. Also, the site does not currently experience drainage or flooding problems; therefore, rebuilding the garage in the same location and maintaining the same amount of lot coverage would not adversely impact the Subject Property or surrounding properties. While the remains of the old structure could be repaired, a new structure would be more aesthetically pleasing. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 7-0. to recommend that the Village Board approve the Petitioner's request and permit a detached garage to be built 3.41' and 4.51' from the rear and side yards, and allow a 31' wide driveway and to maintain 55% lot coverage. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their June 7, 2005 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. Ijc H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2005\MEJ Mcmos\PZ.17-05 MEJ (548 Ida Ct V AR).doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMIsSION . CASE NO. PZ-17-05 Hearing Date: May 26, 2005 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 548 Ida Court PETITIONER/OWNER: Vincent & Judy Altobelli PUBLICATION DATE: May 11,2005 PIN #: 08-14-404-007 -0000 ZONING: R3 Low Density / LAND USE: 3-flat Multi-Family Dwelling LOT SIZE: 0.17 acres (7,720 square feet) REQUEST: Variations for 1) Location of Detached Garage, 2) Lot Coverage, and 3) Driveway Width MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Arlene Juracek Leo Floros Marlys Haaland Ronald Roberts Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Joseph Donnelly (arrived at 7:53 PM) STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Ellen Divita, Deputy Director, Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Judy Altobelli, property owner Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Keith Younquist moved to approve the minutes of the March 10,2005 Workshop Meeting and Ronald Roberts seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0 with an abstention by Leo Flores. Richard Rogers moved to approve the minutes of the April 28, 2005 meeting, seconded by Keith Youngquist, 6-0. Chairman Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-17-05, 548 Ida Court, a request to re-build a garage with a variation of location, driveway width, and lot coverage. This case is Village Board Final. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner summarized the request: The Subject Property is located north of Dempster Street, between Linneman Road and Elmhurst Road, and contains a multi-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned R3 Low Density Residence and is bordered by the CR Conservation Recreation District to the north and R3 to the east, south, and west. The Subject Property currently has a detached garage that encroaches into the required rear and side yard setbacks. Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-17-05 Page 2 The Petitioner would like to demolish the existing garage because it was damaged in a fire. The Petitioner's insurance company assessed the garage to be a 'total loss' and authorized payment for a new garage. The Petitioner would like to build the new garage using the existing concrete slab, which is located 3.41' and 4.51' from the rear and side yards respectively. However, the location of the existing garage does not meet current zoning regulations; the property was developed under Cook County regulations and later annexed into Mount Prospect. Since the entire garage would be demolished, the structure nO longer retains its legal nonconforming status and it must be rebuilt according to current zoning regulations, which requires 5' rear and side yards. The insurance company will not pay for a new garage floor, a concrete slab; therefore, the Petitioner is seeking a Variation for the proposed location because they want to rebuild the garage using the existing concrete slab. As part of the Staff review, Staff found that the site currently exceeds the 50% lot coverage limitation and the driveway exceeds the maximum width listed in the Zoning Ordinance. Although the size and design of the proposed garage would be the same as the existing 482 sq. ft. garage, the site would have 55% lot coverage. The Zoning Ordinance requires the site to meet current zoning regulations for the location of the garage as well as comply with lot coverage. The site does not comply with current Village zoning regulations because: 1) the building encroaches into the required side yard, 2) the site exceeds the 50% lot coverage limitation, 3) the existing detached garage encroaches into the required side and rear yard setbacks, and 4) the driveway width exceeds 26' which is the maximum permitted width. However, the building and driveway are legal nonconforming structures and are allowed to remain 'as is' since the Petitioner is not modifying them. Since the Petitioner would demolish the garage and construct a new garage, it is required to comply with current code requirements for setbacks and the site cannot exceed lot coverage limitations. The table in the Staff Report identifies compares the Petitioner's proposal to current Zoning requirements. The standards for a Variation are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. They relate to: a hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; lack of desire to increase financial gain; and protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner is proposing to build the same size garage in the same location as the existing garage. However, the insurance company will not cover the cost of a new garage floor. While Staff can understand the reasoning for the Petitioner's request to rebuild the garage in its current location, the site could be modified to comply with current code requirements. The Building Division confirmed that the garage floor could be modified so it complies with Village Code requirements by saw cutting the portion of the slab that encroaches into the required setbacks. Additional concrete could be added so the footprint of the garage is maintained. In addition, the Petitioner could narrow the driveway so its width complies with zoning regulations and the site would then comply with the 50% lot coverage limitation. Based on the information submitted by the Petitioner, the Variations are needed to rebuild a garage damaged in a fire. The site was originally developed under Cook County regulations and the site does not comply with current Village Codes. However, the requested Variations are based on convenience as opposed to proving a hardship, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. I!:'Pl.i\ K COTviMP&Z 2005\f'vJinutc')\p?>! 7...()5 Ida CO'.ld SI 5~26-05 Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-17-05 Page 3 Although the requested variations are unlikely to have a detrimental effect on neighborhood character, the request fails to support a finding of hardship, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the Variations to permit a detached garage to be built 3.41' and 4.51' from the rear and side yards, and allow a 31' wide driveway and 55% lot coverage to be maintained at 548 Ida Court, Case No. PZ-17-05. The Village Board's decision is final for this case because the rear setback is more than 25% of the code requirements. Commissioner Rogers asked what percentage of the garage must be destroyed before the garage is considered a total loss. Senior Planner Judith Connolly replied that the insurance company deemed it a total loss, but if he was asking about the non-conforming status, the code states that less than 50% must be in need of rebuilding. Though from the pictures the garage appears to have less than 50% needing to be rebuilt, Judith Connelly confirmed the petitioner looked into the viability of rebuilding the original structure. Commissioner Donnelly confirmed that only the garage is under review, not the non-conforming status of the driveway. Senior Planner Judith Connolly replied that as a result of the garage request, the review of the request with the non- conforming statute identified other items that are non-conforming. The code does say a new structure would have to comply with lot coverage as well as the setbacks. A variation would run with the land. The parking requirements for the property are based on the number of bedrooms. For a 3- bedroom unit, 2.5 spaces are required; for 1- and 2-bedrooms, 2 spaces, so this building, as a 3 flat, 2-upstairs and one basement unit, would require 7 parking spaces. Chairman Juracek swore in the petitioner, Judy Altobelli, owner of 548 Ida Court. Judy Altobelli explained there had been a fire of unknown cause. The whole front and one whole side of the garage are gone, Inside, the rafters are charred, one wall has a broken window, and the back is stable. Her garage contractor could rebuild at the same cost as a new garage as there is more work involved. She said she wasn't aware of all of the non-conforming use. She asked about the parking requirements. Chairman Juracek replied that the Commission was considering if the property could meet the requirement of 7 parking spaces and still meet the setback requirements, which could be a rationale for approving request. Ms. Altobelli said a new garage would be a better situation, she doesn't want to just repair at the same cost, she already has the insurance check and would like to rebuild. She talked to two garage companies, who said the estimate to replace the cement floor was $7-9,000. Commissioner Rogers noted that her alternatives seem to be a repair job, or moving the garage for a rebuild, due to the pre-existing conditions. The Commission is trying to help the petitioner. If the request is denied she will most likely repair the existing garage and the non-conforming conditions remain but the structure will not be as uniform as a new construction garage. If a variance is given, a 3-car garage could not be built due to lot coverage. Lot coverage could change if the driveway was narrowed but the 5 cars owned by the tenants are parked on the sides of the driveway. Deputy Director Ellen Divita asked, if the tenants are all on the drive, who parks in the garage, the owner replied she had been renting the garage to a landscaper who was then able to keep his trucks in a garage. Lois McMichael, 547 Ida Court called the Community Development Department to voice support for the project. H.PLANJ'I:mni & COi\Vvl'P&Z 2005\[\lInuh,sPZ-!'7,05 S4X ida Cour! St ~-26-05 \1 Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-17-05 Page 4 Staff noted that the project would qualify for a minor variance, except for the rear setback. Deputy Director Ellen Divita read from the Village Code regarding minor variations, stating one could be allowed if a project (1) Will be replaced with the same type of structure, (2) Does not exceed a total of two (2) accessory structures per lot of record, (3) Extends into no more than forty percent (40%) of the required interior side yard setback, (4) Extends into no more than ten percent (10%) of the rear yard setback, and (5) Where the applicable lot coverage does not exceed the maximum permitted for that zoning district by more than ten percent (10%). Deputy Director Divita summed up that the way she reads the code, a minor variation could be allowed except for 7 inches in the rear yard setback. Therefore the Board would have to weigh piecemealing and rebuilding vs. construction of a new garage. Other components from code requirements are applicable here: 1) The situation was in effect when the property was annexed. 2) The owner has not changed the property in some way so as to create the nonconformity. 3) The requested relief is not out of character with the neighborhood. The Commission asked whether the garage could be rebuilt 7 inches shorter. Staff looked into that but it is already a small structure, 21 feet deep. Chairman Juracek summarized that the property mirrors other conditions on the block, backs up to a park, doesn't have drainage issues, is pre-existing from the County, the petitioner didn't create the situation. The Commission also confirmed that the request is only to rebuild the garage, other property improvements, were they to be proposed, would still be subject to correcting applicable non-conforming code issues. Chairperson J uracek: If there is no further discussion, I will move tc> close the discussion. Leo Floros made a motion to recommend approval for Variations to permit a detached garage specific to the current footprint to be built, 3.41' and 4.51' from the rear and side yards, and allow a 31' wide driveway and 55% lot coverage to be maintained at 548 Ida Court, Case No. PZ-17- 05. Ronald Roberts seconded the motion. The plat of survey will be attached as an exhibit to show the exact footprint being approved. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Donnelly, Floros, Haaland, Roberts, and Youngquist and Juracek NA YS: Rogers Motion was approved 6 - 1. The question will go to Village Board for their consideration. Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn at 9:12 PM, seconded by Joseph Donnelley. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner , , fl. s: 200'i')'vlil1lltes\P/.17-()) 548 Ida Courl Sl kad 5/31/05 jc ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 548 IDA COURT WHEREAS, Vincent and Judy Altobelli (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for Variations with respect to property located at 548 Ida Court (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 7 in Pickwick Commons, being a subdivision of Part of Lot 1 of Linneman's Division in the West ~ofthe Southeast ~ of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois. PIN: 08-14-404-007-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks Variations to allow the 482 square foot detached garage to be located 3.41' and 4.51' from the rear and side yards, 55% lot coverage, and driveway width (31 '); and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for the Variations being the subject of Case No. PZ-17 -05 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of May, 2005, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 11 th day of May, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and favorable recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variations would be in the best interest of the Village. c Page 2/2 548 Ida Court NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant Variations, as provided in Section 14.203.C of the Village Code, to allow a 482 square-foot detached garage, with a rear setback of 3.41' and an interior setback of 3.41,55% lot coverage and 31' wide driveway, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A." SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. I rvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk H:\CLKO\fiIesIWIN\ORDINANCIVariation-548 Ida Court location of detached garage.doc MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SUBJECT: JUNE 3, 2005 PZ-15-05: VARIATION & SPECIAL USE (ELECTRONIC MESSAG 1002 S. BUSSE RAND ROAD (CVS PHARMACY) ANGELA SMITH, SITE ENHANCEMENT SERVICES - APPLICANT The Petitioner is appealing the Planning & Zoning Commission's decision to deny a request for a Variation for a new freestanding sign specific to CVS Pharmacy only (Case No. PZ-15-05) for the property located at 1002 S. Busse Road (the "Subject Property"). The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their May 26, 2005 meeting. Prior to the CVS development, the Subject Property previously consisted of a 2-1ot subdivision. It was resubdivided as part of the CVS project and a one-lot subdivision was created for the entire Golf Plaza I Shopping Center. As a result, the Subject Property has almost 900 linear feet of frontage onto Golf Road. The proposed location for the freestanding sign is consistent with a sign on a separate lot of record: the proposed sign would be located approximately 285' from the existing sign on Golf Road and approximately 171' from the sign on Busse Road. The attached exhibits indicate that the size and location of the proposed sign would comply with the Village's Sign Code regulations. The proposed electronic message board would include three lines of copy (text) used to advertise CVS's sale items and/or services. However, the proposed sign would exceed the maximum number of freestanding signs permitted on one lot of record; the existing signs would remain, but the CVS tenant panels would be removed. As noted in the attached Staff Report, the Village's Traffic Engineer reviewed the proposal and found that the electronic message board would not adversely impact traffic. In addition, Staff found that the design of the proposed sign would not create a negative impact on adjacent properties because this shopping center has extensive frontage on two major arterial roads and the proposed sign would be located a significant distance from the existing signs. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the Petitioner's request in great detail. Reasons the Commissioners cited to not support the Petitioner's request included aesthetics, the precedent of allowing other centers the ability to have multiple freestanding signs, and safety concerns (the possibility that the sign could create a distraction to drivers). The Petitioner responded that studies cited throughout the sign industry could not confirm that electronic message boards created traffic hazards and offered to have the text change no frequently than every 15 minutes. However, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 5-2 to deny the Variation and consequently did not take action on the Special Use request for an electronic message board, Case No. PZ-15-05, at 1002 S. Busse Road. PZ-39-04 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting October 28, 2004 Page 2 The Petitioner is appealing the P&Z's decision and is requesting that the Village Board allow the additional sign. If the Village Board approves the request for the additional free standing sign, the request for a special use permit for an electronic message board will be sent back to the Planning & Zoning Commission for their review. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their June 7, 2005 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. Ijc H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2005\MEJ Memos\PZ-15-0S MID MEMO (1002 S Bususe Rd - SU - clec sign APPEAL).doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-15-05 Hearing Date: May 26, 2005 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1002 S. Busse Road PETITIONER: Angela Smith, Site Enhancement Services (Agent. for CVS/Pharmacy) PROPERTY OWNER: CVS Pharmacy and DiMucci Companies PUBLICATION DATE: May 11,2005 PIN#: 08-15-203-010-0000 REQUEST: Variation for a 3rd freestanding sign & Special Use approval of an electronic message board sign MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Arlene Juracek Leo Floros Marlys Haaland Ronald Roberts Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist Joseph Donnelly arrived at 7:53 PM STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Ellen Divita, Deputy Director, Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Angela Smith, Site Enhancement Services (Agent for CV S/Pharmacy) Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. Keith Younquist moved to approve the minutes of the March 10,2005 Workshop Meeting and Ronald Roberts seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0 with an abstention by Leo Flores. Richard Rogers moved to approve the minutes of the April 28, 2005 meeting, seconded by Keith Youngquist, 6-0. Chairman Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-r5~05,1002S. Busse Road. . CVS Pharmacy is asking for a special use for an electronic message board. She said that this case would be Planning & Zoning Commission Final. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner summarized the request: The Subject Property is located at the southwest comer of the intersection of Busse and Golf Roads, and consists of a multi-tenant retail center with CVS Pharmacy on the southwest comer of the intersection. The Subject Property is one lot of record, 7.3 acres in size, and is zoned B3 Community Shopping Planned Unit Development. The site currently has two freestanding signs, which are permitted by the Sign Code. The Petitioner has tenant panels on both of the freestanding signs as well as wall signs on the CVS store. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMJ'yf\P&Z 2005\Minutes\PZ-15-05 CVS Pharmacy (iolfPlaza J May26- 05.doc Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-15-05 Page 2 install a new freestanding sign specific to CVS Pharmacy only and Special Use approval for the proposed freestanding sign to have an electronic message board. The Petitioner's exhibits demonstrates that there is significant distance between the two existing signs and the proposed signs, about 285' separating the proposed sign from the existing sign on Golf Road and about 171' from the existing sign on Busse Road. The Petitioner's exhibit shows that the overall height of the sign measures 12-feet from grade and that the size of the sign face, including the electronic message board is less than 75 square feet. The base of the sign will be red brick and capped with a standard masonry material. The electronic message board would include three lines of text used to advertise CVS sale items and/or services. In order to approve the Petitioner's request, the P&Z Commission has to find that the proposed freestanding sign meets the criteria for a Variation because the proposal exceeds the maximum number of permitted freestanding signs, which is one per street frontage per lot. The required findings for sign variations are listed in the Sign Code and relate to: the sign allowed under code regulations will not reasonably identify the business; the hardship is created by unique circumstances and not serve as convenience to the petitioner, and is not created by the person presently having an interest in the sign or property; the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood; the variation will not impair visibility to the adjacent property, increase the danger of traffic problems or endanger the public safety, or alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and be in harmony with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. , Prior to the CVS development, the Subject Property consisted of a 2-10t subdivision. It was resubdivided as part of the CVS project and a one-lot subdivision was created. As a result, the Subject Property has almost 900 linear feet of frontage onto Golf Road. The proposed location is consistent with a sign on a separate lot of record: the proposed sign would be located approximately 285' from the existing sign on Golf Road and approximately 171' from the sign on Busse Road. The Petitioner's request would not adversely impact the neighborhood or the adjacent properties. The Village's Traffic Engineer reviewed the request and found that the sign, including the electronic message board, would not adversely impact traffic or endanger the public safety. In order to approve the electronic message board, the P&Z Commission has to find that it meets the standards for a Special Use. The required findings for Special Use requests are listed in the Sign Code and relate to: protection of public safety and welfare; harmony with the scale and architecture of nearby buildings and signs; lack of negative impacts on adjacent properties or signs; and compliance with other provisions of the Sign Regulations. The Subject Property has expansive frontage onto Golf and Busse Roads and the size of the sign complies with Sign Code regulations. The Village's Traffic Engineer reviewed the proposal and found that the electronic message board would not adversely impact traffic. In addition, Staff found that the design of the proposed sign would not create a negative impact on adjacent properties. However, the Petitioner has tenant panels on the existing freestanding signs; Staff recommends that the tenant panels on the existing signs be removed if this sign is approved. Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-15-05 Page 3 Based on this analysis, the proposed sign meets the standards for a Variation and Special Use because the site has expansive frontage onto two major arterial roads and the proposed sign would be located a significant distance from the existing signs. Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the proposed Variation and Special Use to permit an electronic message board for the CVS freestanding sign subject to the following conditions: 1. Remove the existing CVS tenant panels from both of the existing freestanding signs; andthat 2. The proposed sign shall comply with the standards, which are related to the message board not being a traffic hazard and not being a nuisance. The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision is final for this case. The Commission confirmed with Judy that the request for this sign was essentially the same as the one approved for the CVS by Randhurst Shopping Center. The sign code would allow up to 50% of each wall elevation up to 150 s.f. CVS did not exceed that and Ms. Connelly does not recall that CVS asked for a variation at that property. There is a limit of 75 s.f. on a freestanding monument sign. The tenant panels on the two existing signs are probably about 10 s.f. Commissioner Rogers recalled that this shopping center, Golf Plaza I, was one of the last to conform to the sign code in terms of 24' high signs and that this center was limited to 2 freestanding signs for various reasons. He doesn't believe the Commission should allow 3 signs because if it is allowed here, the other shopping centers will ask for the same thing. It would be 2 signs on a main street. He holds particular concern for safety of an electronic sign at a main intersection although he knows the traffic engineer said it would not be a problem. Commissioner Youngquist asked what would go on the two freestanding signs if the CVS panels were removed. Ms. Connelly indicated another tenant name would be placed on the sign. There are more than 6 tenants in the center but only 6 panels on each sign. Chairman Juracek swore in the petitioner, Ms. Angela Smith of Site Enhancement Services, an authorized agent for CVS Pharmacy. She is located at 3699 W. Lathrop in South Bend, Indiana, 46628. Ms. Smith said she would start with the special use request first because it has led them to need the request for the variance. They have appeared before the Village before as CVS is installing electronic message boards at stores across the country because they have found significant difference in the performance of the stores. They are looking for creative ways to use the signs. For example, one of the things they are pioneering is to tie these signs into the Amber Alert system so that they become a community asset as well as an asset for the store. They felt that if they came before the Commission to ask for additional space on the two existing signs they feel they would be doing the. Village a disservice, creating confusion: with an electronic sign on a multi-tenant sign, as people might drive by and wonder to which tenant does the sign belong? In this instance, designing a sign to incorporate with what was already there was beyond their ability because there are so many tenants in the center. So, they looked to what they could do to create a sign exclusively for CVS Pharmacy. Short of re-subdividing the property and going back to that question, the suggestion was to incorporate a sign that would function as if it were already functioning before the store was built, as if there were two lots. As noted, the property was originally two lots. Asked how the electronic portion of the sign would operate, Ms. Smith replied this would be a static sign that would function similarly to the way an alarm clock. functions, so it is an Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-15-05 Page 4 instantaneous change. She believes that they agreed at their other store that the message would change every 15 minutes. So unless you were there on the interval, you would only see one message. The sign would not scroll, blink, or otherwise call attention. Asked if there was an electronic message at the store at Elmhurst and Rand, Ms. Smith replied the sign had been approved but not yet installed. The Commission asked, if they were to subdivide the property, would ingress-egress easements be needed. Ms. Smith replied it would be very complicated as CVS did not own the property. To be considered would be parking code requirements, the needs of the many tenants, creation of a new lot, creation of a new lease, renegotiation of cross access agreements at shared drives, and shared services which they do not have to negotiate out as one lot. Regarding the color of the LED lights, Ms. Smith stated CVS would like to utilize amber LED lights, but they would do what the Board would like. CVS has found that white LED creates glare and believes that amber LED is the most legible. She noted that they believe further landscaping would be needed and provided an exhibit showing the change to the landscaping plan at the corner. Signs only stay on when the store is open. The sign would be single color with a single message. Chairman Juracek noted there were no interested parties in the audience. Commissioner Donnelly confirmed that there is no provision in the code for a message change every 15 minutes and that the Commission could request color preference as well as night and day settings. Ms. Smith said she has never been asked for different light settings between day and night but that the sign would be of latest technology so she thinks they would be able to adjust intensity of the sign. Concerned over safety, the Commission discussed placement options for the sign which would increase the ability for it to be read at all four legs of the intersection. Ms. Smith stated they believe the 45 degree angle requested would allow for visibility from all directions. She referred to the "law of primacy" a study that found a driver would not turn their head around, they would attend to the larger task at hand, driving the vehicle. Commissioner Roberts stated it would be great to have a visual, which would show what the sign would look like from each direction, Ms. Smith said they would consider a Commission recommendation for a change to a location perpendicular to Golf Road. Commissioner Youngquist asked what the benefit would be for a IS-minute delay on message change. Ms. Smith said that's notwhat they prefer, but would consider that cycle as that's what was approved on the last sign. They typically do 15-30 seconds as the fastest they change messages, they would open it to the Village's direction and offer a limit comfortable to the Village. The Chairman reminded the Commission that the last sign was denied by the P & Z Commission and the Village Board allowed the IS-minute change cycle. The Elmhurst/Rand site is more complicated. The hope is that whlltever message might be up at the time is the one that would encourage a viewer to visit the store. This technology takes away the problems associated with changeable copy sign such as time to change the message and immediacy of the message. At 3-lines of text, they have found 15 seconds to be sufficient for the message to be understood; longer messages would be left up for 2 intervals of 15 seconds, 30 seconds total. When the message is complex, it is left up longer so that it is understood. Some messages are programmed from a central location, but usually it is programmed locally by a store or regional manager to allow for various municipality requirements. When asked by Chairman Juracek what they would do if this request were denied, Ms. Smith said Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-15-05 Page 5 they would have to go back and work with the property owner to see if there was a way to meet sign needs -- a situation they had hoped to avoid. The two existing signs were approved for multi-tenant. They were part of the original approval, appearance and location, so this opens up the situation to bring the whole development back for approval. The property owner would have effort and expense for one tenant because the other tenants would ask for ability to use the message board. There is not a lot of window space in the building compared to other stores. Commissioner Flores asked if the Village had requested the IS-minute time interval. Senior Planner Judith Connolly said she would have to go back to minutes, but she thinks that was part of the appeal to the Village Board. Commissioner Donnelly recalled the Commission's resistance to the sign due to the busy nature of Rand Road and stated he believed the IS-l1liritite cycle was an attempt to respond to the Commission's concerns. Ms. Smith stated that if that cycle were a condition of approval, they would agree to the Commission's direction. Senior Planner Connolly summarized that an electronic sign would allow them to change the message quickly and more easily than with changeable copy. She said that 15 seconds is consistent with what Whiteway Signs had said at the Commission's special workshop. Staffs recommendation that the sign would be safe is tied to fact that this is a signalized intersection where traffic does stop. Commissioner Donnelly recalled the Commission's determination that one message per screen would be safest so that drivers would not slow down to read a message appearing on multiple screens. He believes these safety concerns are valid. Ms. Smith agre~d that the sign should be easily read, messages should not be split, their messages are succinct; she further noted that often it is a passenger that reads the message. The code does allow a message to change every 2 seconds; if the Commission wishes a different timing it would need to be put in a motion. Commissioner Rogers reminded the Board that if this sign were approved, they opened up an opportunity for every center to request an additional freestanding sign. Commissioner Roberts clarified whether staff enforces timing of electronic signs; Senior Planner Connolly replied that staff enforces any situations noted. Commissioner Donnelly noted that the Commission expects to add changes to the code based upon their March 10th Workshop, though they are not there yet. Chairman Juracek stated she is tending to question the 3rd sign as she believes the corner is very cluttered and a driver would be past the driveways when they would see the sign and make the decision to turn in. Commissioner Donnelly added that landscaping may block the signage as trees are very low there. Commissioner Roberts looked at the factors for special use noting the amount of pedestrians trying to cross Golf and stated his belief that the sign would not increase public safety, and that such a sign would not be in architectural harmony. Commissioner Juracek stated they don't object to use of an electronic sign and new technology, but that the larger question for them was whether there should be a third freestanding sign. She asked if there was a way to work within two signs. Staff clarified there are two discussions before the Board, a variation for the 3rd sign and a special use to allow an electronic message sign. The Chairman noted it would be appropriate to take two votes. The Commission asked the petitioner if she would like to table the motion and address the concerns of the Commission. She replied that, either way she would have to re-apply with any alterations, so she preferred a vote be taken. That would allow her to go back to the property owner and say the vote was this, what else would you allow. It was noted there is a way to put an electronic sign on the building. Given that the property is zoned as a PUD, discussion would take Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-15-05 Page 6 on a whole different character if options were considered for electronic messaging on signs other than the requested 3rd freestanding sign. With no further discussion requested by the Commission, Chairman Juracek moved to close the hearing and asked for a motion. Joseph Donnelly made a motion to recommend approval for a variation for a 3rd freestanding sign, removal of CVS from the sign panels, Case No. PZ-IS-OS. Richard Rogers seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Donnelly, Youngquist NAYS: Floros, Haaland, Roberts, Rogers, and Juracek Motion failed S to 2. There was not a second vote. Staff recommended that, in order to vote on a special use for an electronic sign, more detail is needed. If the Village Board would approve a variation for the third sign, Staff would recommend that the question of an electronic message board would come back to Planning and Zoning to discuss the specific location, technology, and timing of an electronic message sign. After the vote, the Commission held additional conversation regarding the Village sign code. Were this a second lot of record, a 3rd sign would be allowed. The CVSbuilding stands out with its own identity as if it were on an outlot, but this is no longer a viable parcel. The code seeks to reduce clutter. It has been a long road to clean up signage. Ms. Smith was asked why CVS didn't request an electronic sign at the time the building was built; she replied that it was cost prohibitive at that time. Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn at 9: 12 PM, seconded by Joseph Donnelley. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Departnlent CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 15-05 LOCATION: PETITIONER: 1002 S. Busse Road Angela Smith, Site Enhancement Services (Agent for CVS) PROPERTY OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: CVS/Phamlacy 08-15-203-0 I 0-0000 7.3 acres (318,467 sq. ft.) B-3 Community Shopping Planned Unit Development Retail Center Special Use & Variation - electronic message board sign LOCA nON MAP ClcarWlller Park 1710-17H4 W. GoifRd. Mount Prospect Park Oidrict ~ , ~ ... 1101 1100 > '':; 1101 1103 11112 Q ... 1103 ... 1105 1104 " 11110 .. " 1105 '':; 1101 1107 1106 ~ 1102 Q 111111 ... .. 1107 1105 1103 1109 1108 0 1106 1104 -g 1102 1109 1107 " lJOS 1111 1110 1108 1106 ~ 1104 1111 1109 ... 1107 1113 1112 11I0 ... 1108 e ! 10(, IllS 1114 1113 1112 1111 IlIt1 ~ 1109 IIIIS "t:l 901 c: e ~ <:.l '" 905 '" - - ~ 812 900 902 904 <:.J = "" .....J 906 "0 Q Q ~ <:.J 908 o.t "0 ~ 1102 J 105 1104 ~ 1107 1106 1109 1108 1111 11111 MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENEJURACEK,CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: MAY 19,2005 SUBJECT: MAY 26, 2005 PZ-I5-05 - SPECIAL USE & V ARlATION (ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD) 1002 S. BUSSE ROAD / CVS PHARMACY HEARING DATE: BACKGROWfD A public hearing has been scheduled for the May 26, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application submitted on behalf of CVS Pharmacy, the "Petitioner", regarding the property located at 1 002 S. Busse Road (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has requested a Special Use permit for an electronic message board sign. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the May 11, 2005 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property, Golf Plaza I, is located at the southwest intersection of Busse and Golf Roads, and consists of a multi-tenant retail center and a CVS Pharmacy on an outlot. The Subject Property is one lot of record and is zoned B3 Community Shopping Planned Unit Development. The Subject Property is bordered by the CR Conservation Recreation and B3 Districts to the north, B4 Business Retail and Service to the east, R4 Multi- Family Development to the south and RA Single Family (Mansions ofMt. Shire Apartments) to the west. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The site currently has two freestanding signs, one on Busse Road and one Golf Road, which are permitted by the Sign Code. The Petitioner has tenant panels on both of the freestanding signs as well as wall signs on the CVS store. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to install a new freestanding sign specific to CVS Pharmacy only and Special Use approval for the proposed freestanding sign to have an electronic message board. As illustrated on the attached exhibits, the overall height of the sign measures 12-feet from grade and the size of the sign face, including the electronic message board is less than 75 square feet. The base of the sign will be red brick and capped with a standard masonry material. The electronic message board would include three lines of copy (text) used to advertise CVS' s sale items and/or services. REQUIRED FINDINGS VARIATION STANDARDS In order to approve the Petitioner's request, the P&Z has to find that the proposed freestanding sign meets the criteria for a Variation because the proposal exceeds the maximum number of permitted freestanding signs (one per street frontage per lot). Required findings for sign variations are contained in Section 7.725 of the Village of Mount Prospect Sign Code. The section contains specific findings, listed below, that must be made in order to approve a variation. PZ-15-05 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting May 26, 2005 Page 3 . The sign allowed under code regulations will not reasonably identify the business; . The hardship is created by unique circumstances and not serve as convenience to the petitioner, and is not created by the person presently having an interest in the sign or property; . The variation will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood; . The variation will not impair visibility to the adjacent property, increase the danger of traffic problems or endanger the public safety, or alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and be in harmony with the spirit and intent of this Chapter. Prior to the CVS development, the Subject Property consisted of a 2-lot subdivision. It was resubdivided as part of the CVS project and a one-lot subdivision was created. As a result, the Subject Property has almost 900 linear feet of frontage onto Golf Road. The proposed location is consistent with asign on a separate lot of record: the proposed sign would be located approximately 285' from the existing sign on Golf Road and approximately 171 ' from the sign on Busse Road. The Petitioner's request would not adversely impact the neighborhood or the adjacent properties. The Village's Traffic Engineer reviewed the request and found that the sign, including the electronic message board, would not affect traffic or endanger the public safety. SPECIAL USE STANDARDS In order to approve the electronic message board, the P&Z Commission has to find that it meets the standards for a Special Use. Required findings for Special Use requests are contained in Section 7.720 of the Sign Code; the following list is a summary of these findings: . Protection of public safety and welfare; . Harmony with the scale and architecture of nearby buildings and signs; . Lack of negative impacts on adjacent properties or signs; and . Compliance with other provisions of the Sign Regulations. The Subject Property has expansive frontage onto Golf and Busse Roads and the size of the sign complies with Sign Code regulations. The Village's Traffic Engineer reviewed the proposal and found that the electronic message board would not adversely impact traffic. In addition, Staff found that the design of the proposed sign would not create a negative impact on adjacent properties. However, the Petitioner has tenant panels on the existing freestanding signs; Staff recommends that the tenant panels on the existing signs be removed. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, the proposed sign meets the standards for a Variation and Special Use because the site has ~:fs~;;;;~~f~~~~;:~~~~:~~~:~~~:~:;-~t~~~~~~~~~s~~~~:;o~~:dp~o~:~~~~~~~~~~~;~~J~il Use to permit an electronic message board for the CVS freestanding sign subject to the following conditions: ! f 1. Remove the existing CVS tenant panels from both freestanding signs; and ) 2. The proposed sign shall comply with the standards listed in Sec. 7.330.A of the Sign Code. ! I _ The ~~_i~~~_~~~~~:~.~~~::.~~i.~~.~. deci~~~r this cas~__._____.______.__.. _/ _/ I concur: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847,818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Sign Variation Request Planning & Zoning Commission Final The Planning & Zoning Commission has fmal administrative authority for all petitions for sign variations. PETITION FOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW Common Address(es) (Street Number, Street) ..iM 2- Bu~~ RoAD Tax J.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s) Z 08> - \5-2.03 - 0\0 - 0000 0 ..... Eo-< ~ Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) 0 l:;l;, ~ f"-1 () L-F 12:> uSS E. ~ONSoL\bATt=:D R-t: Su (2) OF ~ Eo-< Lo\S ..... !l- AND .2 IN Ck ou= BO~:SE SC)PD1V lS\O \'! 00 z o ..... ~, 0...... l:;l;, fa ~ .~ Qo.. ~~ 01 ~ ~ ~ U -< ~ Name Telephone (day) S7'-tJ 8',<0-2..<40 Telephone (evening) (5 '7'-i f37f.o -- ~ t...\-o A NktE.LiC\ M. ~M 11H Corporation :::, \TE E: N \-\A-i'JCE \V,t::.NT SEf..v ~c.ES Street Address Fax 3(0 I LAT\-\ \<-0 of State Zip Code IN 4101020 (8'1, 'I~cq - L\-o Pager City FoR C~VS ha(~0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Special Use Request (Sign) P&Z Final "-';'-'-"i..:""!;<-,D;;'.""...'.:'.>.;.,,,,';:':;i',;::.,:i:',,,>'"~'.'i"':"---', "0 -,' The Planning & Zoning Commission has imal administrative authority for all petitions for sign variations, Special Use Permits, to appeals from the Sign Code. PETITION FOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW , Common Address(es) (Street Number, Street) 1002- S. 'I6U SSE- (<DAD Tax J.D. Number or CoUnty Assigned Pin Number(s) 06 - \s - 203.:: Q\ 0,.- COoo ( [;LK f:t \2.0 V E. To \V N S i-I \"?) Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) Z (~Ol.-r '\3U,,:;>SE c.,ONSOL-IDATSD R ~ .s. L> B OF" 0 ~ LOTS .L ANt:) 2 IN C"t C> L F" bU.sS F ~uBbl\/I7SloN ~ ~ loot rI.l z o ..... ~, 0.... ~ ~ ~.!:l ~l 01 ~ t.-' ~ U < ~ Z o ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ e;; g- O .... ~/l.o t.-" ~ U < ~ Telephone (day) (SI'--\) v7i.v-2~o~ Telephone (evening) ('074 Name A ~ 2. '- .'" 3N- \ \-\ Corporation S \Tt.-EN 'Mt'--J(.,~\V\.~~\ S~V\L6-S. Street Address 3L.AC\ 'vV E:.ST LA\V\f2..Df' City State Zip Code 300\\-\ 13, ~~'D \ N l\t.,tp2.8 Interest in Property AGENT rO~ QAJS( \--.cu-~Cl-c-,-\ (T~"I\\-) Fax Name Telephone (day) '2- N\c~ \ Corporation Street Address Fax: LeoS W. Pager City VA-LA S Sign Installer \ L- ,?/,qbl Name ,<;uR.f _ '-\~\-\T 'S\c, N c..o. Address \ ~ \ D N. '02 rd A- \J E:. S"TONE. 'Vf\-RV-'I \ L lo() \ (oS (70~)3'-\ 3-7'-l'-lG, Telephone: Fax z 0 Architect .....1 fool ril N/Pr ~] Name Telephone: o ~ f ~<B Address Fax ~J: ~~ Og- ~~ ~ v uO <I Landscape Architect ~ N/A- Name Telephone: { Address Fax Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois 2 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 I Code Section(s) for which Variation(s) is (are) Requested '1 . 30 5 . A. \ Summary and Justification for Requested Variation(s) _16 0....\\0\'\/ Q" f-r("'eS+-Cl\d\~ 0 '5'(") ~\ \1\) \1e...\"e.... .not- o-k--e..nl\il~...p--, "'P"rr-<\\ -\\-~r\. . ~l\J '5./ rh(HT(UL~l-- ~ ~ E-c ~rJ:J o~ ;;...;:;l ~o n rJ:J.... E-c U -< ?\ e.~~~ ~e.<u Cc'\-\-o...c..\-1a:;\ J tJs'-\-\ t-\uct-\O\) Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village Staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition and all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorizecl representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affmn that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accumte to then of my knowledge. . Applicant w,~ ->>t k:J-f',-<< Date ..:/..2t?!':J If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agen associated supporting materi 'T~Nf\~\ rl0p,-,ty Owner for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the .., i Date 1/7/05 / ' ~(Zb~c.~"'\'{ ()WNE~ 2>\~~j\\\J~c.. GtIVE.\'-\' I,,-t A--rrAc\-\E..D LEITE.~ 3 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Village of l\fount Prospect - Sign Variation Request The proposed sign is designed to identify services and products offered exclusively by CVS/pharmacy. Due to the nature of the development, CVS/pharmacy is not on an independent parcel and, therefore, the Sign Ordinance does not pennit a sign at this location that would serve the CVS/pharmacy exclusively. Due to constraints at the time of development, the portion of the property on which the CVS/pharmacy is located was incorporated in to the larger development. While this limits the signage to that allotted for the overall development, the CVS/pharmacy operates independently from the adjacent businesses. Because this site serves different businesses, attempting to develop a sign that incorporates the needs of CVS/pharmacy with the needs and desires of all the other tenants is extremely difficult. The existing signs were designed and developed prior to CVS/pharmacy locating at this site. Amending the signs to incorporate the new electronic message board technology would not only be extremely difficult, it would be even more difficult to distinguish which tenant was associated with the message being displayed creating confusion for motorist. The placement of the sign on the site would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or community. The proposed location is significantly behind the required setbacks and site visibility triangle. Every effort has been made to locate the sign at a safe distance from the intersection. The proposed location further ensures that the variation will not impair the visibility of adjacent properties or businesses. The proposed variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. This is a commercially zoned property conducive to the proposed sign. The variation will allow the petitioner to convey the message in the most accurate and concise manner possible. The proposed variation is in complete harmony with the spirit and intent of this Sign Ordinance. The CVS/pharmacy functions as an independent business. As such, granting a variation to allow for a sign at the proposed location would not impede the intent or spirit of the Ordinance. Your consideration and approval would be greatly appreciated. Code Section(s) for Request 7,33 () (A Summary and Justification for Request \0 o..\~o\JJ c.-vs. tu '\ () iro.. \ \ (A w'\~ 0... S ~ ~ ...~ o~ >~ Cl::O <:~ ~oo ~z ;:'0 00- Eo-< U <: ~\ Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all requiied plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village Staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition and all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and owner of the property grants employees of the Village of Mount Prospect, and its agents, permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affum that all information provided herein, and in all materials submitted in association with this application, is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Applicant ~iA /J(? h ;1-/, Date {)J~1'o/(JS- If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent the purpose of seeking the request described in this application and the associated supporting material. , P~-:~J~~1"r- Date 1/' 7/ as- , P' S.l~N A-TLJ\<E- ~IVEN IN A-lTAGHG:O l..,ET1cR.-. Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois 3 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Village of Mount Prospect - Special Use Summary and Justification: The proposal will increase traffic safety through advanced notification of the store location and provide a positive contribution to future growth of this corridor. The relief, if granted, will not be materially detrimental to the health, safety, and comfort or general welfare of the other properties or improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed electronic message board is not a flashing, blinking, or scrolling sign. The message remains static for a minimum of 15 seconds, and changes in a manner similar to a digital alarm clock. Also, the proposed electronic message board can be used as a community communications resource providing efficient and timely notification of services, such as blood pressure screenings or flu shots. The requested Special Use will not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the area. The size and placement of the signage is consistent with the size and architecture of the building, as well as the Sign Ordinance for the Village. It is also appropriately proportionate to the surrounding road speeds and traffic patters. This request allows CVS/pharmacy to consider traffic safety issues, both of the surrounding area and within the development, without adversely affecting the overall commercial character of the area. The addition of an electronic message board is the latest in technology and shows the true investment into the property that CVS/pharmacy is making. In addition, this sign will eliminate any type of temporary signage that CVS/pharmacy would normally seek approval for and would also ensure the aesthetic appearance of the property is up to the Village of Mount Prospect's high standards. The economic prosperity of this property will extend beyond this individual business and have a positive impact on the surrounding commercial properties. By placing the sign at the comer of the intersection it will be clear that the information portrayed is for the CVS/pharmacy and not other business located within the development. This location will not discourage the installation of sign on any adjacent property. The proposed sign is over 170 feet from the closest ground sign on Busse Road and over 285 feet from the closest ground sign on Golf Road. The sign will confonn to applicable regulations of the Sign Ordinance relative to the height, sign area, and set back of the sign. The hardship is unique to this property and not shared by other properties in this zone. This is a freestanding business operating on a multi-tenant parcel. The consolidating effect of the electronic message board means it can display messages in one location that might otherwise appear as a number of additional temporary signs on the building or property. Its site specific programming would inform the public of values and services available only at this site. The relief sought will be desirable and without substantial detriment to the public good. The electronic message board offers a more flexible, easier to read, and aesthetically pleasing means of communicating. The proposed use of this technology represents a considerable investment for CVS/pharmacy and reflects the importance of this community to them. m x (ii' :=-. ::l (0 (f) "'- .(0 , -.---__._::l ~! ~/ -,' ~! J 'IJ.. ~~ J 1 ! toa.~!l Illt1 II 11 1 i ~~ ~ '1J ) a ...... m "'0 (]I 0 w , x en 0 (]I (ii' (!) I ~ a. ...... ::l en 0 (J) (0 CD cO' ::-::: ...... en :J I\) cr cO' = 0> en (j ::l CD A ...... 0- j)) if (j fA 171 '-7 II - - ~I J., TT o I C\J .... ~ C\J --... .... .... , C\J <0 I LO 11 or C\J ,'. - '~.'-: .:'": -....::,. ,;; .. 11 '-1 1/ t 9' 8' . 1 8':5" ! ! ---- . 1 = - . .......-,......;,...;,....:-.'.<,:--_:-';~.:.. :...",~::... :..,...,.'-....'>-.. -- ...., - ". :,.-,-'," .. . .. ......-.. ..,. ,... . - -, " .. _ < - - .' ,"-, ..':-. -_ <<":: ..,.~:'.-,,;~--.:~._::.::: :':::.~.~~'t~:.~...;.7.:.::'~'::.:?:~...; ::'>~-...,._< :, .. M-50 Monument ImagePoinL CLIENT/STORE#: CVS DRAWN BY: ANS CHECKED BY: DATE: 9-8-04 SCALE: 114"=1'-0" Kad 5/31/05 Jc 05/31/2005 Be 6/2/05 Ed 6/2/05 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1002 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD WHEREAS, The CVS Pharmacy (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner') has filed a petition for a Variation with respect to property locat~d at 1002 South Busse Road, (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property') and legally described as follows: Lot #1 in the Golf Busse Consolidated Resubdivsion of Lots 1 and 2 in Golf Busse Subdivision Property I ndex Number: 08-15-203-010-0000 and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation to install a third freestanding sign on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of PZ-15-05 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of May, 2005, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 11th day of May, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations for denial of the request to the President and Board of Trustees for the request being the subject of PZ-15-05; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals setforth are incorporated as findings offact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. D SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C.8 of the Village Code, to allow the installation of a third freestanding sign on the Subject Property, as shown on the Site Plan and Petitioner's exhibit, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as "Exhibit A." SECTION THREE: Prior to the issuance of a building permit relative to the Variation, the following condition and/or writtend()cumentati6n shall be fulfilled: Remove the existing CVS panels from the freestanding signs on the Busse Road frontage and Golf Road frontage; SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. Irvana K. Wilks Village President ATTEST: Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk H:ICLKOlfi1esIWINIORDINANC\Special Use,sign,CVS Busse Road, June 05,doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department Mount Prospect MEMORANDUM FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~O/' t--t;r&, t.. ~ TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 3, 2005 SUBJECT: PZ-37-03 / ZLATKA RESUBDIVISION (1201 BURNING BUSH & 1903 E. EU RESUBDIVIDE 2-LOTS ZLA TKA PAVLOVIC - APPLICANT The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-37-03, a request for a plat of subdivision, as detailed in the attached Staff Report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their October 23, 2003 meeting. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the proposed plat and related sewer improvements. They noted that the resubdivision would impact the existing septic system servicing the Euclid Avenue property. There was discussion regarding how to ensure the sewer improvements would be made to the Euclid A venue property since the proposed subdivision would impact the existing septic system. (If the sewer improvements could not be made, the Euclid Avenue property would need to maintain the existing septic system and the subdivision could not be done.) Therefore, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the resubdivision for the properties located at 1201 Burning Bush Lane and 1903 E. Euclid Avenue subject to the sewer improvements being made at the Euclid Avenue property. In order to ensure compliance with the P&Z's recommendation, the Petitioner agreed to obtain permits from the appropriate agencies prior to Village Board approval. Unfortunately, the Petitioner encountered a significant delay in obtaining a sewer permit due to an unrelated matter stemming from an ICC ruling. The issue was recently resolved and the Petitioner will make the required sewer improvements in accordance with Village Code requirements. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve the Zlatka Resubdivision. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their June 7, 2005 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. ltl ICP William J Ijc H:\?LAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2005\J1..1EJ Mcmos\PZ.37-03 MEJ (Zlatka Rcsubdivision}.doc MINt; J.ES OF THE REGttARl\1EETING OJ! 1.tIE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-37-03 Hearing Date: October 23,2003 PETITIONER: Zlatka Pavlovic 1201 Burning Bush Lane PIN#: 03-25-402-047-0000 & 03-25-402-002..0000 REQUEST: Plat of Resubdivision MEMBERS PRESENT: Arlene Juracek, Chairperson Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Richard Rogers MEMBERS ABSENT: Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Jacobs, AICP, Deputy Director of Community Development Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner INTERESTED PARTIES: Zlatka Pavlovic Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. Merrill Cotten made a motion to approve the minutes of the September 25 meeting, seconded by Richard Rogers. The September meeting minutes were approved 4-0, with one abstention by Leo Floros. At 9:25 pm, Ms. Juracek introduced Case No PZ-37-03, a request for a Plat of Resubdivision. ' Ms. Connolly presented the case and said that one of the Subject Properties, 1201 N. Burning Bush Lane is located on the east side of Burning Bush Lane, between Euclid Avenue and Ivy Lane, and is a vacant lot. She said that the other Subject Property, 1903 E. Euclid Avenue, is located on the south side of Euclid Avenue, between Burning Bush Lane and River Road, and currently contains a single-family residence with related improvements. Both properties are zoned Rl Single Family Residence and are bordered on all sides by the Rl District. Ms. Connolly said that the Petitioner subdivided 1901 Burning Bush in 1999 and created three lots of record, which includes 1201 Burning Bush Lane. She said that the Petitioner is seeking to expand the rear yard of 1201 N. Burning Bush Lane by purchasing a portion of the adjacent property's rear yard. She noted that the depth of the Burning Bush lot would be increased from 100-feet to 200-feet and that the depth of the Euclid A venue property would be decreased from 304.75-feet to 223.45-feet. She said that both properties would meet minimum lot size requirements and that the Petitioner is not seeking relief from any zoning regulations. Ms. Connolly stated that the plat under review maintains two lots of record, but changes the size of the lots to create a larger rear yard for the Burning Bush property. She said that the plat and proposed lots of record comply with Development Code requirements and the Petitioner is not seeking relief from the Development Code or the Zoning Ordinance. She said that other Departments have reviewed the plat and found that it was prepared in accordance with Village Codes. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend that the Village Board approve the proposed plat ofresubdivision for the properties at 1201 Burning Bush Lane and 1903 E. Euclid Avenue, PZ-37-03. She said that the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Chair Juracek asked if the P&Z had questions of Staff. Richard Rogers asked whether the property at 1903 E. Euclid was currently on a septic system. Ms. Connolly said that it was, but that the property owner was in the process of installing sewer improvements. Mr. Rogers stated his concern that the existing septic system would be adversely impacted if the sewer improvements were not implemented at 1903 E. Euclid before the house was constructed at 1201 Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-37-03 Page 2 Burning Bush Lane. Zlatka Pavlovic, 1901 E. Euclid Avenue, was sworn in. She clarified that the correct property owner of 1903 E. Euclid Avenue was Jim Zentefis and that the neighbors were in the process of tying into/tapping into the sewer. She said that the permit for sewer improvements to 1903, 1905, and 1907 E. Euclid Avenue is under review and that she is waiting for MWRD approval before the sewer improvements may begin. Following several questions regarding the MWRD review process, Jeff Wulbecker, Village Engineer, clarified that there is no set schedule for the MWRD review and said that construction can begin after the permit is approved. Mr. Rogers reiterated his concerns regarding the existing septic system and the consequences of the Euclid Avenue property owner not participating in the sewer improvement project. He said that the land being sold to the Petitioner to increase the depth of 1201 Burning Bush would limit the operational capability of the septic system. There was discussion regarding placing conditions of approval on the plat and identifying a mechanism to ensure a house could not be built at 1201 Burning Bush Lane if the sewer improvements were not made at 1903 E. Euclid Avenue. Richard Rogers moved to recommend approval of the Zlatka Resubdivision for 1201 Burning Bush Lane and 1903 E. Euclid Ave., Case No. PZ-37-03, subject to the building permit for 1201 Burning Bush not being issued until the sewer improvements are made at 1201 Burning Bush Lane. Merrill Cotten seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES; Cotten, Donnelly, Floros, Rogers, and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 5-0. At 10:30 p.m., Richard Rogers made motion to adjourn, seconded by Leo Floros. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. H:IPLAN\Planning & Zoning COMMIP&Z 200JI.\linutesIPZ-37-0J 120 I Burning Bush Lane.doc Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 37-03 LOCATION: 1201 N. Burning Bush Lane & 1903 E. Euclid Avenue PETITIONER: Zlatka Pavlovic OWNERS: Zlatka Pavlovic (1201 Burning Bush Ln.) Sabina Zgabljic (1903 E. Euclid Ave.) PARCEL #s: 03-25-402-047 -0000 03-25-402-002-0000 LOT SIZE: 0.19 acres (8,130 square feet) 0.79 acres (34,500 square feet) ZONING: Rl Single Family Residential LAND USE: Single Family Residence REQUEST: Plat of Resubdivision - Resubdivide two lots to create a larger lot of record LOCATION MAP Euclid Avenue ~ Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 16,2003 HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 23,2003 SUBJECT: PZ-37-03 - ZLATKA RESUBDNISION (2-LOT SUBDIVISION) 1201 N. BURNING BUSH LN. & 1903 E. EUCLID AVE. BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the October 23, 2003 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Zlatka Pavlovic (the "Petitioner") regarding the properties located at 1201 N. Burning Bush Lane and 1903 E. Euclid Avenue (the "Subject Properties"). The Petitioner is seeking to resubdivide the site to create a larger backyard for the property at 1201 N. Burning Bush Lane. The plat request was properly noticed by posting a PUQlic Hearing sign on the Subject Properties. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1201 N. Burning Bush Lane is located on the east side of Burning Bush Lane, between Euclid Avenue and Ivy Lane, and is a vacant lot. 1903 E. Euclid Avenue is located on the south side of Euclid Avenue, between Burning Bush Lane and River Road, and currently contains a single-family residence with related improvements. Both properties are zoned R1 Single Family Residence and are bordered on all sides by the R1 District. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL In 1999, the Petitioner subdivided 1901 Burning Bush and created three lots of record: 1901 E. Euclid (existing), 1203 N. Burning Bush (new), and 1201 N. Burning Bush Lane (new). Now the Petitioner is seeking to expand the rear yard of 1201 N. Burning Bush by purchasing a portion of the adjacent property's rear yard. The depth of the Burning Bush lot would be increased from 100-feet to 200-feet and the depth of the Euclid Avenue property would be decreased from 304.75-feet to 223.45-feet. Both properties would meet minimum lot size requirements and the Petitioner is not seeking relief from any zoning regulations. The plat under review maintains two lots of record, but changes the size of the lots to create a larger rear yard for the Burning Bush property. The plat and proposed lots of record comply with Development Code requirements and the Petitioner is not seeking relief from the Development Code or the Zoning Ordinance. Other Departments have reviewed the plat and found that it was prepared in accordance with Village Codes. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Plat of Resubdivision seeks to reconfigure two existing lots of record. The plat and lots comply with Village regulations and the vacant lot will be developed in accordance with all Village Codes. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend the VVlage Board approve the Zlatka Resubdivision, Case No. PZ-37-03. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. Subj ect Lots Before the Res 11 b (1 i vis ion Subject Lots LL\ f t e r th eRes 11 b (1 iyision . ,., 1....:f.."fl.I.M~~~L::~':i~~.~~.1~'.nln."" n' .,...... ~.~::l.. . .~~~~~~~.~'t,\l,..~~:..\I:~.":t.}:....lI\~~.t!o'~ , }:" "..," .,,"'" '.;t..:),I'I.~f'~..U\f::..". ~'injitl:lt, ~1!i,\~..~, ~n~J1;,~', y,.".. '1~~'" . ...... f.~"';;' 'I~ ! !/ ''-:~ ~.! /,~;~f ~ ~~~p \~;';4 ~ :.\ ~~t'~.l1 #1~11.~ J ':',j~\. ..~, ,1J..~'t'~. '~Ir'jl ,." .:,1: /~'l'. ~ l{\ ,-'J ;::.! I. .~.:.;1 .~ ,.': ~t ,.t:'"t ",' ~}" t, t .~ tl .to.....~...h"'~'\(~.~t,~ :....lft:~' . ~~..;....t 1.',~'.""" .It I~ ..', . . ~ ','" ' ., ':.~':, .": .;. ;,:;'i.i'~:~.-l:o~";"'-f..r~.f.Y';-""'7t':~~I,~:"'F.1\\\>i.I-\'t;t'jI.i>'"~'.";',:-.I':'P'>:.. :'.10./,,' " . '. : I! .~." \..l.l"~',"'.l~t;jl:;, l...../f1~~~. :\~\,).'i!.'i".i.'''',,'''':'~ ~.~.: \.~ ~}:'~,,\~'I.' ".' ...., ., ...r,~,....,l"."':..".'t~.J.~ """'ifil'j...'~.ti'<.J,/I.t~",.~,~..... ~ I . Ill' t .f.....:t., \...'i"'....t.\..:-..~ 'j'''' .(iJ',lro",' ,P:";'r~.....:... ' ...... . \.. ~, '.'1"," ",.,,~,"i\lI",1".:.,:~.t':,.. it. ./...i1.~I(J("I.f\.~.;.li-... ,:.1.... f~t\...J ,. .., .I .. ",' 1& ...~~ " , ..,.\_ . . .;1 (,I" ( \' . ..' . . "I . I~l:"\.:) ~ ~.....4,:.",~~.,.t.'fl,;t..1>"'::"-:1"'1"', ,,"''' <,~~,\, '(~IIIII:',. 't .~. , . "" , '" Jt" \t.,f....,,~,.. J)'I'......l 1\'" . I, J ..\,..1.. ". 1.....'.. .' . .... i~, i ,~'" ~'.Jt...' .;".1', .. ".' " .r.' .. '2.1' :. .' ..... . . t:. ,. [, ~J ..~(-. ~ 'fJ", " " .". -.., ." , I i.Zoi ' I . , . '\ ..!,~ ~ ." , ~. ) . '.' . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _................~ ..~...-~_.- ~- - - - -,-,-- -- . t... l..:.' "~4~.;4{"""'" 'l . ',f. . . . I. \. . .~. 01.', ~ i"~ '\~;'" : ,'* . ," . . . . . . '., \. .;,,"'J ~...'""",,'" , ' BURNING '" :;." '~:'~B1;~( ~~(~f~})~t~~I('L"A' .N~'E ,:. .' .:.' ,ft." :tJ.; ..~'J!;\;.<.,.""",~" ' ,,(.: ,. ;'.' ':':''-'r,~.\'P\:',;.~,'.,(~...i.~f~I~;~,,':;:~~~q~';i;~';..\>'~'<"'j' .' ' :;""." .,',... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -.- _ _ -_-... ....~ _ -~ ~:...~.. ...1.1.,-" - - - - - - - ---- - - - -- Wut line 0' the SO..th....t.\ of Sectioft.25-.2-11. .. .} .~ ,....;-f:(......;;.)~.~ : ','-;. , . , ' 'I ;'. .\; . .;'-'.., '. · ., ~.t \ ~.~; ~.'\:' '. ~ :~' :. ~::-//~;;.t~\.I.:.'... CJ\ (ttERETOrORE: DEDlCAJED) \ \ '..' '.' ,~.< \ .....~/.'. > 'f': . ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~;. _... _'_ _ _ _' _ . ,'. ..:~..;~~~'l~y;\:jj.'i.i:1i~:;.i....;2... :.'_ ~_,. ~~ :'.' I 81..]0' l . 8t.30" '1\i ,..:,. ,J;: , . 142.15' . I ~ .'0 ..p ,.D I" :"~"",,,,,~;"'.... .....~..::t\ :. ...',. .'. I 10. A.. I .", ,'," " '.,):.;;: I~" -, '""" , : . , : I, .' . . 1 .::' ~,:::(....; '. - . '.~" .. I' , I ;, .' '. 1 1 I .' .' I I. I . J: !;) . . " '., I I . \,' ~ "t. ,'j - . ,. I ,<:-0- -....,' .; . ~ -, ". . " . I : - - - .]0,- e..iidI"; t:k;.- - - ~ "-'Ft-I:~ --,-- -;- Jo-;.~ -U-;,;- ~11-l~'"Ti:"'r:'--~'--30'-~ ~~- ---- -- -- -~ '. I . ~ ''"" .'.' fa '. '(:",1'.. . , , ... _ 'f . , "f:' ' I '4- : ..:.- 1-'" .1.' .-' " ~'l ." . I t 8 t . t -, '" J i ' .: ' r ' .. ..!t I." . ." ,'. c' ~ 'I" " ... 8. I' ,'. "a".. "':')'. ", ' . .'.\' ~.." . (,f', ,.r'OI . I ' I 8 . . " .., ,,' " .. . 0 p ., I .~.. '. I I I .I... ....1 t " - , ,'" .r fl' I.. .,;.'. ~, ~ 1 I. :.... ....,. , f . 8 I, . ~,\..... I'IJ~' :),~{,'..;.:. ;~.,.... fl", . ./ ,.' 'I . 1 1-" .,. ,..t,',' il'," I 5, (; ..' I ,4.. ~. '.' '}. !~.l 1,\\..,,11.,...\ ~.... ., ': JI.., I , I ,"\ ~'"",,, ,.:; I, "1 t..".l.'...."~~. ',' I I' " '5'16l 'f.,~.~~ 1a. ..'..... . '. '5"S' ..:J. :l...~.., ~.. :\':,~.:.' .,' il I .~ / ,I '\. ," ....~~1:.' I ",. ~... .-':'.~.'.,:~' . .' I 4. " ' "'" ...,... .1.. .~ ., /. i,;l..\. ~', ,".,.",,',",' ..: /- r' " ,~'\: ~ I ill' . .,. "') ~ I . I rJ _ _ m-,--'ir - - - -L L____..;.,...:__ ______J L____. ~--------... -,..-..:--------4---' , .... \., r - - - 1- , l'l 0 ~ u. I~ q It..1O" q 'q 142.1" , . , q . ~ ~ ,.- - - ---4 - - ..- - - - - - - - - - - - =<.- r--- - - - - - - - - --r -- . 81.JO'.. "!... . U "! 22-'.4' U ..I! ~. I "'r-"--"'--"-- _",__",_~_______",____________________"',J_ - - , i: ~ '" , .;" . . J JI '1J I . 4.... I I . . '.;' ....\. . ,'. '. ,0. I . ~" I .. ., I I I , J . " I J , ~., .' , " " .' I I' . .'. ~I I ,", i'" '" o "..' ~. ~ r ~I.! -'S<! o I I . a;' Q ~ 81' 4." ~ ~ J'I PI' " : I '8' 'II. ' .I .' . : 8, & 1 1~.1 ca:.. 'N 5-1 1 , ' . .".;a '. · I , I, ,1 '. 1.. I , , ,< "to 'I I I ';. .' I I . 4.' I I l '. :t,'.' i. .. , : . ~ ' .:. :. " '.'" . ~.. '. ,.'. I , ,. .". . I L~' . . _..- . - - - - - - - -- J I tf!.----.~:..-~L~-7":..~~-.-----'7F.~!5'------- '--------------t--:=9' ., __~____ U!, _____~~.J....;..~--._...-__-----'~- "" {, 81.JOO '" 'a""':: {....~ :- . _ to J, ....., 'b I .. . I.. ~, , 't , '-' v' .' t'.....,. _ : I ,J ,. , 'l,' , .' . " I ,_" \ I . . , I 1 I ~! .1 , . \....' , ;::;' ~ ~ ~ M ~ o j , 1 ! I , 1 1M !,~ :,~ In 'r I' .~ :1 t:J ,: ! " . ~I' i I t.l ~ '1.'1.~ [: -< I I t-r-I ~,iz r.I, ~ ~:,'M ~i I' I. " kad 5/31/05 JC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1201 NORTH BURNING BUSH LANE AND 1903 EAST EUCLID AVENUE WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Zlatka Pavlovic, has requested approval of a Final Plat of Resubdivision for the purpose of subdividing two lots to create a larger lot of record at 1201 North Burning Bush Lane; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission. has recommended approval of the resubdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the resubdivision of two lots into one lot of record is hereby granted for the properties at 1201 North Burning Bush Lane and 1903 East Euclid Avenue and the Final Plat of Resubdivision attached to this as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording. Such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution. SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION THREE: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk E. Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department Mount Prospect MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: JUNE 3, 2005 SUBJECT: PZ-13-05 - KELLY'S MOUNT PROSPECT SUBDIVISION 416 & 418 S. MAPLE STREET STRATFORD HOMES (SEAN KELLY) - APPLICANT The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-13-05, a request to consolidate two lots and a parcel to create a two-lot subdivision. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their May 26,2005 meeting. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, reviewed the case. She said that the Subject Property is located on the west side of Maple Street, between Lincoln Street and Sha Bonee Trail and that it appeared that the Subject Property was used as a parking lot for South Church, which is across the street. Staff had concerns and wanted to confirm that developing the Subject Property would not create a parking deficiency for the Church. Therefore, the Petitioner submitted facility usage information from the South Community Church as part of the subdivision request. Staff found that the Church complies with the Village's parking requirements and that developing the Subject Property will not create a parking deficiency for the existing Church. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the Petitioner's request and noted that the Petitioner would comply with all Village Codes. The Petitioner confirmed that they are in the process of finalizing the required storm water detention design. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve the Kelly's Mount Prospect Subdivision. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their June 7, 2005 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. '!~~7..~ William 1. Cooney, Jr., W. CP Ijc H:\PLAN\Plalllling & ZOlling COMM\P&Z 2005\MEJ Mcmos\PZ~13.05 ME) (416 418 S Maple plat).doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-13-05 Hearing Date: May 26, 2005 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 416 & 418 S. Maple Street PETITIONER/OWNER: Stratford Custom Homes I Sean Kelly PUBLICATION DATE: May 11,2005 PIN#: 08-12-304-027 -0000, 08-12-304-028-0000, and 08-12-304-032-0000 REQUEST: Resubdivision (Consolidate two lots and a parcel to create a two-lot subdivision) MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Arlene Juracek Leo Floros Marlys Haaland Ronald Roberts Richard Rogers Keith Youngquist MEMBERS ABSENT: Joseph Donnelly (arrived at 7:53 PM) STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Ellen Divita, Deputy Director, Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Ledo Bertolozzi Sean Kelly Shirley Maus Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:32 p.rri. Keith Younquist moved to approve the minutes of the March 10,2005 Workshop Meeting and Ronald Roberts seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0 with an abstention by Leo Flores. Richard Rogers moved to approve the minutes of the April 28, 2005 meeting, seconded by Keith Youngquist, 6-0. Chair Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-13-05, a request to submitted a Plat of Resubdivision to create a two-lot subdivision. She said that this case would be Village Board Final. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner summarized the request: the Subject Property is located on the west side of Maple Street, between Lincoln Street and Sha Bonee Trail. It consists of two lots of record and a parcel located between a parking lot and a single-family residence. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family and is bordered to the north, south, and west by the RA District and by the CR Conservation Recreation District (Lions Park) to the east. The Petitioner is seeking approval to resubdivide two-50'xI57.l8' lots of record and a 22'xI57.18' parcel to create a two-lot subdivision. The proposed lots would each measure 61.02'x157.18' which exceeds the minimum lot size for the RA District. Plat approval includes Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-13-05 Page 2 Planning & Zoning Commission review and a recommendation to the Village Board. The Village Board's decision is final for the proposed plat. Although the Petitioner purchased the Subject Property from an individual owner, David Mann, it appears that the Subject Property was used as a parking lot for South Community Church, which is across the street. Staff had concerns and wanted to confirm that developing the Subject Property would not create a parking deficiency for the Church. As part of this Resubdivision request, the Petitioner submitted facility usage information from the South Community Church. The Church provided information that documents that their on-site parking lot meets their parking needs but does not comply with the Village's Code requirements. However, the Church complies with the Village's parking requirements when the parking lot across the street from the Church, directly south of the Subject Property and owned by the Church, is included in the parking calculation. Developing the Subject Property will not create a parking deficiency for the existing Church. The Petitioner has submitted plans for two new residences and the plans are under review to confirm they will comply with Village Codes, including but not limited to the RA bulk regulations for setbacks, Floor Area ratio, and lot coverage. The Commission is not reviewing the plans for the homes this evening, only the subdivision request. The Village's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map designate the Subject Property as Single- Family Residence. The Petitioner's proposed development is in keeping with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. The Fire Department noted that the proposed homes and site would have to be constructed according to the Village's regulations, which include but are not limited to the installation of fire hydrants and fire sprinklers. The Engineering Division had no objections to the Resubdivision and found that the plat had been prepared according to Village Code regulations. In addition, the Petitioner submitted preliminary engineering as part of the Resubdivision request. Engineering reviewed the design and found that the concept would meet Village Code requirements. However, the preliminary plans needed to be modified slightly and the final engineering plans, which will be submitted as part of the Building Permit, must comply with Village Code requirements. The Petitioner seeks to create two lots of record by resubdividing the Subject Property. The plat was prepared in accordance with the Development Code requirements, but requires signatures from the utility companies. Staff notified the Petitioner of the required signatures and the Petitioner is in the process of obtaining them. Because the proposed Kelly's Mount Prospect Subdivision plat has been prepared in accordance with Village Codes, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend the Village Board approve the plat for 416 & 418 S. Maple Street, Case No. PZ-13-05. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. The Commission clarified with Senior Planner Judith Connolly that the new northern lot line would not impact ability to utilize remaining parking at the remaining parking lot still owned by the Church, as the entrance is on Sha Bonee Trail. A total of 39 parking spaces exist in that lot and 28 exist across the street for a total of 67 parking spaces, which is adequate for the Church. Village code requirement is for 50 spaces. Commissioners noted that in recent years the lot has been underutilized. Pavement has been removed by Stratford Custom Homes. Though that work II. 8' CO!\1MP&l2005\Mi!1utcs\PZ.I3~()S .doc Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-13-05 Page 3 was done without permit, all construction will be to Village code. It would appear that at some time in the past the Church had owned the land in question. Chairman Juracek swore in the petitioner, Mr. Sean Michael Kelly of Stratford Homes. Mr. Kelly stated that Judy had covered everything. As far as the parking was concerned, he had provided her with all the information from the Church. He is in the process of doing the permit review and has met with the Engineering Department to discuss the storm water; that's as far as he has gotten in the building permit process. Chairperson Juracek clarified that Mr. Kelly was present to re-subdivide the property and not to apply for any variances. The Petitioner responded he is only there to move the boundary lines, widening two 50' lots to become two 61' lots. Asked what storm water management was required for a 2 residential parcel, the Petitioner responded that the Village Public Works Department storm water review is needed for a 2 parcel subdivision, storm water must be maintained on site, can't run off to other parcels. The Commission noted that a site that was formally pavement would now contain two homes. With no further discussion requested by the Commission, Chairman Juracek moved to close the hearing. Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval ofthe plat for 416 & 418 S. Maple Street, Case No. PZ-13-05. Leo Flores seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Floros, Haaland, Roberts, Rogers, Youngquist, and Juracek NAYS: None ABSENT: Donnelly, who later arrived at 7:53 PM. Motion was approved 6 to O. The meeting continued with 3 additional cases. Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn at 9: 12 PM, seconded by Joseph Donnelley. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner 8: COM]\{P&Z 2005\Minute'O\PZ..13-05 !vIt Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ-13-05 LOCATION: PETITIONER: OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 416 & 418 S. Maple Street Stratford Custom Homes I Sean Kelly Sean Kelly 08-12-304-027-0000,08-12-304-028-0000, and 08-12-304-032-0000 0.45 acres (19,656.25 square feet) RA Single Family Residence Vacant (paved) lot Resubdivision (Consolidate two lots and a parcels to create a two-lot subdivision) LOCATION MAP ~.~~IIL' ~ffi .~ ~ '"NT ST_ . ~ -' Cweo" ST ~ .~ ~ ~, '"' "' m .;11 rJl ,III 1-1 I,~ II E SHA-BONEe-'tRL -c I ....... J't CI) CI) n :r 8 '"' r . VI , I !IC ~I z 'VI' -c m""^ ilF ,-ri ',~E MOEHLING OR , ,,' ----.J r I i",__ - ~ ' .:l:L- >1 J8! ;!!- ':;;b- _ _ "o"i~o", rt= MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: MAY 19,2005 HEARING DATE: MAY 26, 2005 SUBJECT: PZ-13-05 - RESUBDIVISION (CREATE 2-LOT SUBDIVISION) 416 & 418 S. MAPLE STREET (SEAN KELLY - APPLICANT) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the May 26, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Sean Kelly of Stratford Homes (the "Petitioner") regarding the properties located at 416 and 418 S. Maple Street (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has submitted a plat of Resubdivision to create a two-lot subdivision. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the May 11, 2005 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has provided written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the west side of Maple Street, between Lincoln Street and Sha Bonee Trail. It consists of two vacant lots of record and a parcel located between a parking lot and a single-family residence. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family and is bordered to the north, south, and west by the RA District and by the CR Conservation Recreation District (Lions Park) to the east. The South Community Church is across Sha Bonne Trail, south of the Subject Property. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner is seeking approval to resubdivide two 50'xI57.18' lots of record and a 22'x157.l8' parcel to create a two-lot subdivision. The proposed lots would each measure 61.02'x 157.18' which exceeds the minimum lot size for the RA District. Plat approval includes Planning & Zoning Commission review and a recommendation to the Village Board. The Village Board's decision is final for the proposed plat. Background Although the Petitioner purchased the Subject Property from an individual, David Mann, it appears that the Subject Property was used as a parking lot for South Church, which is across the street. Staff had concerns and wanted to confirm that developing the Subject Property would not create a parking deficiency for the Church. As part of this Resubdivision request, the Petitjoner submitted facility usage information from the South Community Church. The Church provided information that documents their on-site parking lot meets their parking needs, but does not comply with the Village's Code requirements. However, the Church complies with the Village's parking PZ-13-05 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting May 26, 2005 Page 3 requirements when the parking lot across the street from the Church, directly south of the Subject Property and owned by the Church, is included in the parking calculation. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE Currently, the Subject Property is a paved lot. The Petitioner has submitted plans for two new residences and it appears the proposed structures will comply with the RA bulk regulations (setbacks, Floor Area, lot coverage). Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning The Village's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map designate the Subject Property as Single-Family Residence. The Petitioner's proposed development is in keeping with the Village's Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. Other Department Comments The Fire Department noted that the proposed homes and site would have to be constructed according to the Village's regulations, which include but are not limited to the installation of fire hydrants and fire sprinklers. The Engineering Division had no objections to the Resubdivision and found that the plat had been prepared according to Village Code regulations. In addition, the Petitioner submitted preliminary engineering as part of the Resubdivision request. Engineering reviewed the design and found that the concept would meet Village Code requirements. However, the preliminary plans needed to be modified slightly and the final engineering plans, submitted as part of the Building Permit, must comply with Village Code requirements. SUBDIVISION STANDARDS The Petitioner seeks to create two lots of record by resubdividing the Subject Property. The plat was prepared in accordance with the Development Code requirements, but requires signatures from the utility companies. Staff notified the Petitioner of the required signatures and the Petitioner is in the process of obtaining them. RECOMMENDA TION The proposed Kelly's Mount Prospect Subdivision plat has been prepared in accordance with Village Codes. Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend the Village Board approve the plat for 416 & 418 S. Maple Street, Case No. PZ-13-05. The Village Board's decision is final for thisc:a.se. I concur: Wil ; oney, AICP, Di ector of Community Development l. William J. Ijc H:\PLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 200;'SlarrMcmo\PZ-13-0S MEMO (416 418 S Maple. rcsubdivision create 21oIS}.doc VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847-818-5328 FAX 847-818-5329 Plat of Resubdivision Application Mount Prospect z o - r- -<- :;-a- =0 o .v r.~ z.... -0 ;.<- ~ Q Z - z o - r- -< :; = o r.. :z: - Q :z: ::J o = o ::c: u -< = Case Number PZ tiC~ Subdivision Name/Address t/t; ~ I ~'lOv Daterf S)ltlm' ssion '3 2'1 O,~ Hearing Date Petitioner - Name Sean Kelly Corporation Stratford Custom Homes, Inc. Street Address 403 S Arlington Heights Road City State Arlington Heights II Interest in Property: circle one Property Owner - Name SAME AS ABOVE Corporation Zip Code 60005 xxx Owner ';7:- S. ~~{ bx \.;6 S St1te Zipj ~ode l-- li! ~ or;; Su rveyorlEngineer Name Schlaf - Sedig & Associates, Inc Address 1030 Summerfield Dr., Roselle, II. 60172-3520 U~ P1 V \ Telephone (day) 847-392-9500 Telephone (evening) Fax 847-392-9503 Pager Buyer Telephone (day) Telephone (evening) Fax: Pager/Mobile Telephone (day) 630-924-7100 Fax 630-924-9689 SUBDIVISION NAME ~\ \ '1' t'\().,U"\ ~~ S\;\ ~JI V is-or,, REAL ESTATE INDEX NO.: 0 'i> \;}., REAL EST ATE INDEX NO.: b ~ \ ~ O<t, T :). 'k b ~, Maple Street Mt. Prospect. Illinois -~D ~ 0 L.l o J.1 - coO() q q L( ::}b - o~~ )fo; 03~ CGbO LOCATION OR ADDRESS: LAND USE: EXISTING Vacant TOTAL ACREAGE: Il ':> GROSS PROPOSED: \ '\, \ ~~ Sq. t4. PROPOSED: SFR (l-A ZONING: EXISTING ~-1\ TOTAL # OF LOTS: 2 Number of dwelling units: d. Single Family: XXX Multifamily TWNHS_ If requesting an exception to Development Code requirements, list request and explain why it is necessary: Uc c.f- ~Y\S Please note that the application will not be reviewed until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. Incomplete subm.ittals will not be accepted. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the appropriate Village staff to review the process and so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness at the time of submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Applicant ~ ~.~ Date :) ~ OS If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting mMeriai. Property Own.. Aeo.-- 1"'- I~ Date :> t ~ I <:l5 Mount Prospect Depi"rtment of Community Development SO South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 ~'"'....... n"""/~__ '^r. KELLY'S MOUNT PROSPECT SUBDIVISION BEING A SUBDIVISION 0;::: =>ART OF THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 41 NORT RANGE 11 ::,';5T Or ,HE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, c, Lot 8 Friedricb Schafer's Add, To Ml. PINS: 08.12.304.027.0000 08-12.304-028-0000 08-12-304-032-0000 ProSpec1 J57.18' 00 l,,,,o,:,.,~. ,. -'~_.:. ~ ' t""~: . -', ._... I I i .-1 I .L 5' ~ent _/ '5 ..J - j -- - '5'Bii'lidmg Lllle/ ---, - --'--_._ _..,_, ;::":',. " :- ! '. " '" I C ;... ~ ,r. ::; v ~' .' ...J ( 1 _I '" '31 tQ," e,,5 t"")1...J ~ "" N' ii o 5 III '-0 ~ ........~-...:;:.:::' J; I - - I ----- -------- -_L_~~~g LlI~:-._ -r - ~--- -------.- /5' Easement'.? -- -- - - - - - '-------- -..---0-.. ---------- __J~7.L8.:...._ __ ~Easemenl - 5'BuildingLm;7 --- - I ------ ;... I -:> ...J ...... CI') "'" ~ ~ ~" o ~ N'" N 1~ ,{~ ']: ~ ~i '31 :::Qiu ~:.~ N,_ '0 :J"j N ~ N N ~ ~ ~ t i5.. 0 0 ce a: ~ :; - <E :8g .. ~ ') " '" '" ,- - c: --.0 "'- -- .- - -- "~te" i ~\- - ..1_ ,/ 5' Building Line , ,,5' Easement ~---=- '------- ""-- ----_, ___ ___ b-'.581~~9" '" N :r , u --~ J:.' ;... o ..J 157, 19' ~i+~ " , ClJ...; ~. ~ ~ c ....,.' ~ -. ONS ELECTRIC, COMMUNICATION FOR AND GRANTED TO r"e: ~5-' ~"'~.' - -- --- -1 ~ ::-. o o NTEES, ;ORS. AND ASSIGNS, JOINTLY REPAIR, MAINTAIN, MODIFY, :JCATE AND REMOVE. FROM NIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS. IPMENT CABINETS OR OTHER RHEAD AND UNDERGROUND :TRICITY, COMMUNICATIONS, 05S. ALONG AND UPON THE I~ n.Ac::~:::n f"\Q "'V"\'T"Tt:n I 11l.1r-t"" ... ., '" -_._'-~- ~._._--_._--~ Sha-bonee Tr. p LA 1 U .F RVEY Cf Lets S, 10 and the North 2i feet of Let 11 ir Friedrich Schaefer's Addition to ~:oLJnt Prospect, being a SubdivisIon of part of the East 1/2 of the North 60 rods of the Scuthwpst 1/4 of Section 12. and the South 33 feet of part of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 12, Townshlc 41 North, Range II, East of the Thlro Prlrclpal MerIdian, In Cook County, IllinoIs. ~; \i c "_ ~ ~J cZ I.- j..j (,..")0 ~ u o L '" o Ul 0::: N End Fence ~. E Face O.OB'E t ~ ~ --l ... ~ s s r.nd Fence 1),3'w ci u}. ~ t J~ "-:J~ Found J.P, O.34'W '" '" ci o Ul 1 ~ L ')>- ;:..,,_. C,,'~9 C.J-r",,,, CLIENT: ....;"'..:"''> IN 41. ';....i..?.z.. LEGEND R . RECORD DISTANCE CH . CHORD M. MEASURED DISTANCE . FOUND IRON D. DEED , SET IRON FENCE UNE -><---1<- UTlUlY POLE WI DVHD, WlRES .--"- LIMITS OF BUILDING ~ CONCRETE SHOWN SHADED SCALE 1" . Zo FEET SCHLAF - SEDIG & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1030 SUMMERFIELD DRIVE ROSELLE, ILLINOIS 60172 1630) 924-7100 s u R:157.25' M:157.18' 0- I I I ! ",1 " "'~ Fence O.2'N ~Oll Curb .... I-< o ,.J c o l/) " ~ ;:; l%l o Z o Cl. I-< o ,.J 0. <( x o m I m -_. '---~-----' I-< o ,.J ~ ;1 -,\ ~ ~~o.t ~O oN Z in o M:157.19' " Ul ~ ~-:--:-?7~ . f~ I I I Sha-bonee Tr. .,\\.\\';"1'" .,""\\C/f.NT ;~'-~. . 11' ~:;;;:~. DATE OF SURVEY t::e e e. '2.oC>C; STATE OF ILLINOIS ~ ~. ~ '.; f" c ".. ~::') "':;"; 'r COUNTY OF DU PAGE ~:S<> " ',:~ 1,// ...L.f- 1\ L\\>~ ~", I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ~'HelfSlJRVEyED, UNDER MY SUPERVISION, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL RECORD AND THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS SAID SURiIEY, ALL DISTANCES ARE SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. THE BUILDINGS ON THE PARCEL ARE WITHIN PROPERTY LINES AND THE ADJOINING VISIBLE IMPROVEMENTS DO NOT ENCROACH ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONFORMS TO THE CURRENT ILLINOIS MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 1 I I ......., MY LICENSE EXPIRES 11-30.2006 COMPARE THE DESCRIPTION OF THIS PLAT WITH DEED. REFER TO TITLE POLICY FOR ITi:MS OF RECORD NOT SHOWN ABOVE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, UTILITIES WITHIN EASEMENTS ARE NOTSftOWNHEREO'N. UNDERGROUNO UTILITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT UMITl:D TO CONDUITS AND CABLES('" ANV)HAVE"/1I(jTBEEN SHOWN HEREON. ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM LAND SURVEYING CORPORATION NO. 4183 !i . i i ~ I I . . L '5 I ~ .if ..... en. o - ~ ~ kad 5/31/05 jc RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 416 AND 418 SOUTH MAPLE STREET WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Stratford Custom Homes, has requested approval of a Final Plat of Resubdivision for the purpose of subdividing two lots and a parcel to create two lots of record at 416 and 418 South Maple Street; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the resubdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,ILLlNOIS: SECTION ONE: That the resubqivisiQn oftwolotsapd i3 parcel into two lots of record is hereby granted for the properties at 416 and 418 South Maple Street and the Final Plat of Resubdivision attached to this as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved for appropriate execution and recording. Such Plat and its legal description are incorporated into, and made a part of, this Resolution. SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION THREE: This Resolution shall be in full force and effectfrom and after its adoption, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk F , . Mount Prospect ~ Mount Prospect Public Works Department. INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: JUNE 1, 2005 ~b. t--ti~ c./"'I}Q$'" TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER SUBJECT: WHEELING ROAD PARKING STUDY The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to prohibit parking along the east side of Wheeling Road between Euclid Avenue and Kensington Road. Wheeling Road is a north-south collector street at the north end of the Village. It is an asphalt street, 35' wide (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) and has parking allowed on both sides of the street except for the first 300' south of Euclid A venue (adjacent to Euclid Elementary School). The west side of the street has multi-family housing known as the Boxwood neighborhood. Because of the density of the housing and the need for parking, the west side of Wheeling Road has permitted overnight parking for the Boxwood residents. Parking is evident throughout the day and overnight. The east side of the street has single family housing. Because of the long driveways at these houses and the fact that Wheeling Road traffic is shi fted off center due to continual parking on the west side and the narrowness of the street, parking is not evident on the east side. This section of Wheeling Road is currently being resurfaced by the Village. During the planning stages of the work, Staff discussed the need to add a double yellow line to separate the northbound and southbound lanes. As mentioned above, the center of the road does not represent a true separation of northbound and southbound lanes. With a daily volume of over 6000 vehicles, the double yellow line will enhance safety by reducing the potential conflict of oncoming vehicles. Excluding the curb and gutter, the asphalt pavement is 32' wide. The parking lane along the west side of the street will be 8' wide. This leaves room for a 12' wide northbound lane and 12' wide southbound lane. The existing pavement width cannot accommodate a parking lane on the east side and budget constraints with the street resurfacing project will prevent any widening. Curb and gutter removal and replacement, driveway work, storm sewer relocation, street light relocation, and parkway tree removal and replacement would all be associated costs with widening Wheeling Road. With the addition of a double yellow line, parking on the east side will have to formally be prohibited. While the request to prohibit parking on the east side of Wheeling Road is Staffs, residents and motorists over the years have suggested adding a double yellow line to enhance safety. The resurfacing ofthe street is a good opportunity to now make this change. Staff sent out 70 surveys to properties that abut both sides of Wheeling Road between Euclid Avenue and Kensington Road to get their opinions on adding a double yellow line and prohibiting parking on the east side. Five surveys were returned with a majority of the responses favoring the proposal. G Page 2 of2 Wheeling Road Parking Study June 1, 2005 The issue was discussed at the May 9, 2005 Safety Commission Meeting. One resident was in the audience to speak on this issue. After some discussion, the Safety Commission supported Staff's proposal to add a double yellow line along Wheeling Road and prohibit parking along the east side of the street. By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends to prohibit parking along the east side of Wheeling Road between Euclid A venue and Kensington Road (Village Code Section 18.2006). Please include this item on the June th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting as well as a location map for your reference. ~< Matthew P. Lawrie cc: Director of Public Works Glen Andler Village Clerk Velma Lowe x: lengineeringltrafficlsnfecomm Irecs&min Imny05rec I.doc I' Kad 5/11/05 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XX OF CIjAPIE:I3J~ENIITLEQ 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ' BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2006 of "SCHEDULE VI - NO PARKING ANY TIME" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding, in alphabetical sequence, the following: "Name of Street . Wheeling Road Side of Street East Description Btw Euclid Ave and Kensington Road." SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and pubIicatloninpamphletform'lnThemanner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. Irvana K. Wilks Village President ATTEST: Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk H:\CLKOlfiles\WIN\OROINANCICH 18,No park anytime,may 05 wheeling road.doc WHEELING ROAD PARKING STUDY VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (9 Z ~w O::::Z <(<( a.. ...J NEW DOUBLE /YELLOW LINE t 32' --r"'- 12' · I- ~8 ~ l- V) W wo ~V) 12' t I- W w 0:::: I- 0~ ZO ~w 0::::0 <(- a.. V) oV) zj!: :1 ~ I-w V)o <(- W V) I CENTERLINE OF STREET I II KENSINGTON RD EUCLID A V Mount Prospect .. ~ Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMQRANDUM ;;~'.i;;;. __,... <.c,;:"." .. ;'<C/.' .".,;,',;p.. ,'>i,..",' .;.:.: ',' ';;'.,,'- ,.g{";:'it.';,<",',,,/~,,"';.!;1t::;;;;. i;>;-;:'i .;,)c:t:tYIi '"' ,;';;t,~; ;,,', :.;;..i',;.,;.';:;i;~;_/.":.;o>.J<;~:,;'_ FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER eb. ~J~ fD} '1 ciS" TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS SUBJECT: SEMINOLE LANE PARKING STUDY DATE: JUNE 1, 2005 The Safety Commission transmits their recommendation to prohibit parking along the south side of Seminole Lane from River Road to a point 200' west. Seminole Lane is an east-west collector street at th.e northe.(1st ~orner of the Village. It is an asphalt street, 46' wide (back-of~curb to back-of-curb) and has parking allowed on both sides of the street. The north side of the street is within the limits of the City of Prospect Heights. Between Park Drive and River Road, the Village border is along the centerline of the street. The City of Prospect Heights has jurisdiction over the north half of the street and the Village of Mount Prospect has jurisdiction over the south half. There are five properties on the south side that abut Seminole Lane along this block. As depicted on the attached drawing, the eastbound direction of Seminole Lane has both a right-turn lane and left-turn lane near River Road to accommodate both tllrning movements at this signalized intersection. The existing pavement markings channel the eastbound direction to the right before creating both turn lanes. On-street parking is not always evident on this block of Seminole Lane. However, when vehicles are parked on the south side of street, they occasionally park within the channelization segment. This forces through vehicles to cross the double yellow line to avoid the parked vehicle. Rather than prohibiting parking along the entire block, Staff has proposed to modify the pavement markings. By removing the channelization and providing a left-turn taper, on-street parking can be provided in front of 2103, 2105 and 2107 Seminole Lane without forcing through vehicles from crossing a double yellow line. It would be necessary, however, to prohibit parking from the beginning of the left- turn taper to River Road so as to not block the turn lanes. Staff sent out surveys to the five properties that abut the south side of Seminole Lan~ betweenP(1rkPrive and River Road to get their opinions on this consideration. One survey was returned. The owner supported the proposal. The issue was discussed at the May 9, 2005 Safety Commission Meeting. No one was in the audience to speak on this issue. After some discussion, the Safety Commission supported Staffs proposal to modify the pavement markings on Seminole Lane and prohibit parking along the south side of the street near River Road. \1 Page 2 of 2 Wheeling Road Parking Study June 1,2005 By a vote of 6-0, the Safety Commission recommends to prohibit parking along the south side of Seminole Lane from River Road to a point 200' west (Village Code Section 18.2006). Please include this item on the June 7th Village Board Meeting Agenda. Enclosed are the Safety Commission Minutes from the meeting as well as a location map for your reference. _~ A -hfQo _ -/lV~ Matthew P. Lawrie cc: Director of Public Works Glen Andler Village Clerk Velma Lowe x: lengineering\trafficlsafecomm \recs&min Imay05rec2.doc kad 5/11/05 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XX OF CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THEPRESIPENT AND SOARD OFTRUSTEi::$OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2006 of "SCHEDULE VI- NO PARKING ANY TIME" of Chapter 18 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding, in alphabetical sequence, the following: "Name of Street Seminole Lane. Side of Street South Description from River Road to a point 200' West." SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. Irvana K. Wilks Village President ATTEST: Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk H:ICLKOIfilesIWINIORDINANCICH 18,No park anytlme,may05 seminole lane.doc -- ~ ~ )... g " V) ~ ~ a::: ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ lLJ 5 -.I ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ Director Glen R. Andler Mount Prospect Deputy Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION DRAFT CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:00p.m. on Monday, May 9, 2005. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Chuck Bencic John Keane Susan Arndt Kevin Grouwinkel Carol Tortorello Anthony Addante Matt Lawrie Absent: Mark Miller Buz Livingston Paul Bures Others in Attendance: See attached list. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Vice Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Police Department Representative Traffic Engineer - Staff Liaison Commissioner Fire Department Representative Public Works Representative Commissioner Keane, seconded by Commissioner Tortorello, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Safety Commission held on December 13,2004. The minutes were approved by a vote of 6-0. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Mr. Conrad Bartels, 1103 Wheeling Road, asked who enforces the permit parking along the west side of Wheeling Road near the Boxwood neighborhood. Officer Addante responded that a private security firm hired by the Boxwood Association monitors the overnight parking and tows those vehicles that do not have a permit. Mr. Bartels also commented on large construction vehicles using WheelirigR.'oad. Traffic PhonH 847/870-5640 Fax 847/2539377 www.mountprospect.org Engineer Lawrie explained the Village's overweight vehicle ordinance and encouraged Mr. Bartels to let the Police Department know of specific construction vehicles that are using Wheeling Road. Office Addante said he would also pass along this information to his supervisor. Mr. Kevin Bolger, 510 N. Prospect Manor Avenue, made the Safety Commission aware of a sight obstruction concern at the comer of Prospect Manor A venue and Isabella A venue. Traffic Engineer Lawrie said he would investigate and follow-up with Mr. Bolger. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS A) WHEELING ROAD PARKING STUDY 1) Background Information The request is to prohibit parking on the east side of Wheeling Road between Euclid Avenue and Kensington Road. Wheeling Road is a north-south collector street at the north end of the Village. It is an asphalt street, 35' wide (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) and has parking allowed on both sides of the street except for the first 300' south of Euclid Avenue (adjacent to Euclid Elementary School). The west side of the street has multi-family housing known as the Boxwood neighborhood. Because of the density of the housing and the need for parking, the west side of Wheeling Road has permitted overnight parking for the Boxwood residents. Parking is evident throughout the day and overnight. The east side of the street has single family housing. Because of the long driveways at these houses and the fact that Wheeling Road traffic is shifted off center due to continual parking on the west side and the narrowness of the street, parking is not evident on the east side. This section of Wheeling Road is currently being resurfaced by the Village. During the planning stages of the work, Staff discussed the need to add a double yellow line to separate the northbound and southbound lanes. As mentioned above, the center of the road does not represent a true separation of northbound and southbound lanes. With a daily volume of over 6000 vehicles, the double yellow line will enhance safety by reducing the potential conflict of oncoming vehicles. Excluding the curb and gutter, the asphalt pavement is 32' wide. The parking lane along the west side of the street will be 8' wide. This leaves room for a 12' wide northbound lane and ]2' wide southbound lane. The existing pavement width cannot accommodate a parking lane on the east side and budget constraints with the street resurfacing project will prevent any widening. Curb and gutter removal and replacement, driveway work, storm sewer relocation, street light relocation, and parkway tree removal and replacement would all be associated costs with widening Wheeling Road. Phon' "i ,..''', ~ :'{:{ ';;P;}. With the addition of a double yellow line, parking on the east side will have to formally be prohibited. There are only 11 driveways along Wheeling Road. Their lengths and widths provide for ample off-street parking. Streets that intersect Wheeling Road such as Cedar Lane and Hackberry Lane are short distances from the single family homes that front Wheeling Road and provide on-street parking that is chosen over Wheeling Road. While the request to prohibit parking on the east side of Wheeling Road is Staff's, residents and motorists over the years have suggested adding a double yellow line to enhance safety. The resurfacing of the street is a good opportunity to now make this change. Staff sent out 70 surveys to properties that abut both sides of Wheeling Road between Euclid Avenue and Kensington Road to get their opinions on adding a double yellow line and prohibiting parking on the east side. Five surveys were returned. Three owners supported the proposal, one owner believes.the Village is catering to the Boxwood neighborhood with this proposal and one owner commented on an unrelated issue. Should the proposal be approved, the addition of the double yellow line will be made later this summer by the Village contractor working on the local street resurfacing program. Signage prohibiting parking will be done by a Public Works crew. 2) Recommendation Based on the Engineering Staff's review of this issue, the Village Traffic Engineer recommends: .:. Adding a double yellow line to separate northbound and southbound lanes along Wheeling Road between Euclid Avenue and Kensington Road .:. Prohibiting parking on the east side of Wheeling Road between Euclid Avenue and Kensington Road 3) Discussion Mr. Conrad Bartels, 1103 Wheeling Road, asked if parking would be allowed on the east side of the street with this request. Traffic Engineer Lawrie reminded Mr. Bartels that the request is to prohibit parking on the east side. Chairman Bencic as1<:~g Tra,fficEngineer Lawrie to present the report to the Safety Commission. Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided an overview ()fStaff's study of the issue. Chairman Bencic noted that there are private driveways along Wheeling Road. With installation of a double yellow line, would owners be able t() legally cross the line to turn into their driveway. Traffic Engineer Lawrie and Officer Addante both (!()ffiIl1ented tha,t the. goubleyellow line would prohibit passing but would legally allow owners to turn into their driveway. Commissioner Arndt said it would be a good idea to let the school know of the proposed changes. Commissioner Keane, seconded by Commissioner Tortorello, moved to approve the recommendations of the Village Traffic Engineer. The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Phone 847/37 B) SEMINOLE LANE PARKING STUDY 1) Background Information The original request was to restrict parking on the south side of Seminole Lane between Park Drive and River Road. Staff has considered another option as part of our study. Seminole Lane is an east-west collector street at the northeast comer of the Village. It is an asphalt street, 46' wide (back-of-curb to back-of-curb) and has parking allowed on both sides of the street. The north side of the street is part of the City of Prospect Heights. Between Park Drive and River Road, the Village border is along the centerline of the street. The City of Prospect Heights has jurisdiction over the north half of the street and the Village of Mount Prospect has jurisdiction over the south half. There are five properties on the south side that abut Seminole Lane along this block. The eastbound direction has both a right-turn lane and left-turn lane near River Road to accommodate both turning movements at this signalized intersection. As is typical practice, the existing pavement markings channel the eastbound direction to the right before creating both turn lanes. On-street parking is not always evident on this block of Seminole Lane. However, when vehicles are parked on the south side of street, they occasionally park within the channelization segment. This forces thru vehicles to cross the double yellow line to avoid the parked vehicle. The request from the motorist who brought this to Staffs attention asked that parking be prohibited along the south side of the street for the entire block. While on-street parking is not always evident, Staff has considered another option to address the concern of crossing the double yellow line while still allowing for some on-street parking. Rather than prohibiting parking along the entire block, Staff has proposed to modify the pavement markings. By removing the channelization and providing a left-turn taper, on-street parking can be provided in front of 2103, 2105 and 2107 Seminole Lane without forcing thru vehicles from crossing a double yellow line. It would be necessary, however, to prohibit parking from the beginning of the left-turn taper to River Road so as to not block the turn lanes. Staff sent out surveys to the five properties that abut the south side of Seminole Lane between Park Drive and River Road to get their opinions on this consideration. One survey was returned. The owner supported the proposal. Should the proposal be approved, the pavement marking changes will be made later this summer by the Village contractor working on the local street resurfacing program. Signage will be done by a Public Works crew. 2) Recommendation Based on the Engineering Staff's review of this issue, the Village Traffic Engineer recommends: .:. Modifying the pavement marking as shown on the attached drawing to better accommodate on-street parking on the south side of Seminole Lane between Park Drive and River Road .:. Prohibiting parking on the south side of Seminole Lane from River Road to a point 200' west. PhonE":; :'.,/; " "'. 3) Discussion There was no one in the audience to speak on this issue. Chairman Bencic asked Traffic Engineer Lawrie to present the report to the Safety Commission. Traffic Engineer Lawrie provided an overview of Staffs study of the issue. Chairman Tortorello asked if those vehicles parked on the south side of Seminole Lane belonged to the single family homes or the condos on then:6rth side of the street. Traffic Engineer Lawrie stated that he believed they were associated with homes on the south side. Commissioner Arndt inquired as to the daily volume on Seminole Lane. Traffic Engineer Lawrie estimated 4000-5000 vehicles per day. Chairman Bencic asked if the Police Department had any issues with the proposal. Officer Addante said he was not aware of any parking issues on Seminole Lane and didn't object to the proposal. Commissioner Tortorello, seconded by Commissioner Keane, moved to approve the recommendations of the Village Traffic Engineer. The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. COMMISSION ISSUES There was some general discussion about the resurfacing project along Central Road. Commissioner Grouwillkel Wlll1ted tQ mllke the Police Department aware that cars were illegally parked on a regular basis on William Street at Prospect Avenue making it difficult to see oncoming vehicles at the intersection. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 6-0 to adjourn at 7:40 p.m. upon the motion of Commissioner Keane. Commissioner Tortorello seconded the motion. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Matthew P. Lawrie, P .E. Traffic Engineer x:\engineering\lTaffic\safecomm\recs&min\may05min.doc Phor:. /;' ~ ; , . VILLAGE DF MOUNT PRDSPECT, SAFETY CDMMISSIDN MEE:1"INI3 ATTENDANCE SHEET MAY 9, ZOOS 7:00 P.M. NAME ADDRESS PHDNE NUMBER C Bp~a5 ..f:evl~ ~ \. Jer lICB~iN6- ~ S J 0 10 I fTosp~~~o r '. ,,'c,c" ',', .:.-". ;',;'. _,'.": ',."'0.0,\,,:,_,:. """"',,*,,,,,,"':"-i"'~~;;"":.o(:i..,,.,";;l',..:,._,,"""..".,( INTEROFFICE MEMQRANDUl\1 .. Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois PURPOSE: To present for the Board's consideratiqn an ordinance increasing the Village's water and sewer rates. TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE DATE: MAY 20,2005 SUBJECT: WATER AND SEWER RATE INCREASE BACKGROUND: Since 1990 the Village has followed the practice of approving moderate annual increases in water and sewer rates, as opposed to implementing large increases periodically. The 2005 Budget included an anticipated 4% increase in water and sewer rates. The Village has enacted water and sewer rate increases of 4.0% in each of the past eight years. DISCUSSION: The following table illustrates the recommended rates as reflected In the proposed ordinance. Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent Inside Village Per 1,000 Gallons Per 1,000 Gallons Change Water $3.93 $4.09 4.0% Sewer $0.39 $0.40 2.6% Combined $4.32 $4.49 4.0% Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent Outside Village Per 1,000 Gallons Per 1,000 Gallons Change Water $7.86 $8.18 4.0% Sewer $0.39 $0.40 2.6% Combined $8.25 $8.58 4.0% For Village sewer users not connected to the Village's water system, the monthly charge per dwelling unit would be $3.53, an increase of 4.0% over the current rate of $3.39. If a Mount Prospect household uses 16,000 gallons of water over a two-month period, their bimonthly water and sewer usage fee would be $71.84, an increase of $2.72. --J- Water and Sewer Rate Increase May 20, 2005 Page 2 No increase is being proposed for the monthly availability charge assessed customers outside of Special Service Area NO.5. For most customers, those with a 5/8" water line, the charge will remain at $10. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Village Board approve the attached ordinance increasing water and sewer rates effective for bills rendered on or after June 1, 2005. ~4"J#, ~_ DAVID O. ERB DIRECTOR OF FINANCE DOEI 1:\Water & Sewer\Board Memo - May 2005.doc t ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND WATER AND SEWER RATES SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A, DIVISION II OF THE VILLAGE CODE Passed and approved by the President and Board of Trustees the _ day of June, 2005. Published in pamphlet form by authority of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, the day of June, 2005. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND WATER AND SEWER RATES SET FORTH IN APPENDIX A, DIVISION II OF THE VILLAGE CODE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 22.504.2 entitled "Water Rates" of Appendix A, Division II of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 22.504.2 of Appendix A, Division II shall be and read as follows: ) " Sec. 22.504.2 WATER RATES: A. All Village users within the village, having a direct or indirect connection with village water mains or pipes: $4.09 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof. All village users outside the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with village water mains or pipes: $8.18 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof. All village users located outside the boundaries of Special Service Area Number 5 shall pay an additional monthly availability charge based upon the size of the water meter as follows: 5/8 inch meter % inch meter I inch meter 1 Y2 inch meter 2 inch meter 3 inch meter 4 inch meter 6 inch meter 8 inch meter $ 10.00 $ 15.00 $ 27.50 $ 42.50 $ 87.00 $150.00 $250.00 $475.00 $990.00 R Hook-up charge for water furnished by the truckload: $10.00." SECTION TWO: That Section 22.504.3 entitled "Sewer Rates" of Appendix A, Division II of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 22.504.3 of Appendix A, Division II shall be and read as follows: " Sec. 22.504.3 SEWER RATES: C. All village sewer users within the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with the village sewer and water mains or pipes: $0.40 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof. All village sewer users within the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with the village's sewer mains or pipes and not with the village water mains or pipes: $3.53 per month per dwelling unit. All village sewer users outside the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with the village's water and sewer mains or pipes: $0.40 per 1,000 gallons of water consumed or portion thereof. AI1 vil1age sewer users outside the corporate limits of the village having a direct or indirect connection with the village's sewer mains or pipes, but not with village water mains or pipes: $3.53 per month per dwelling unit." SECTION THREE: That the fees set forth in this Ordinance shall be applied to all water and sewer bills rendered on or after June 1,2005. SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shal1 be in full force and effect from ami after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. lrvana K. Wilks, Village President ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk kad OS/24/05 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE P~RTAINI.NG TO A DET~RMINATIONQF' THE PREVAILING WAGE RATES WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has enacted "An Act rf3gulating wages of laborers, mechanics and other works employed in any public works by the State, County, Village or any other public body or any political subdivision or by an one under contrac::t for public works," approved June 26, 1941, as amended (820 ILCS 130/1); and WHEREAS, the aforesaid Act requires that the Village of Mount Prospect of Cook County investigate and ascertain the prevailing rate of wages as defined in said Act for laborers, mechanics and other workers in the locality of said Village of Mount Prospect employed in performing public works projects for said Village of Mount Prospect. BE IT ORDAINED BYTHE VILLAGE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: To the extent as required by "An Act regulating wages of laborers, mechanics and other workmen employed in any public works by the State, County, City or any public body or any political subdivision or anyone under contract for public works," approved June 26, 1941, as amended, the general prevailing rate of wages in this locality for laborers, mechanics and other workers engaged in the construction of public works coming under the jurisdiction of the Village is hereby ascertained to be the same as the prevailing rate of wages for construction work in the Cook County areas as determined by the Department of Labor of the State of Illinois as of June 1, 2004, a copy of which wage rates are on file in the Office of the Village Clerk. The definition of any terms appearing in this Ordinance which are also used in the aforesaid Act shall be the ~cHne.as ins~id Act. .. ...... . SECTION TWO: Nothing herein contained shall be construed to apply said general prevailing rate of wages as herein ascertain to any work or employment except public works com~truction of this Village to the extent required by aforesaid act. SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk shall publicly post or keep available for inspection by any interested party in the main office of this Village this determination of such prevailing rate of wages. SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk shall mail a copy of this determination to any employer, and to any association of employees and to any person or association of employees who have filed, or file their names and addresses, requesting copies of any determination stating the particular rates and the particular class of workers whose wages will be affect by such rates. ]" Page 2/2 Prevailing Wage - 2005 SECTION FIVE: The Village Clerk shall promptly file a certified copy of this determination with both the Secretary of State and the Department of Labor of the State of Illinois and shall further cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the Village, a copy of this determination which shall constitute notice that the determination is effective and that this is the determination of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of May, 2004. Irvana K. Wilks Village President ATTEST: Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk H :\CLKO\fiIes\W I N\ORDI NANC\PrevailingW age, 2005.doc Cook County Prevailing Wage for June 2005 Page 1 of7 Cook County Prevailing Wage for June 2005 Trade Name RG TYP C Base FRMAN *M-F>8 OSA OSH H/W Pensn Vac Trng -------------------- ------ ------ ----- ----- -------------------- -.----- ------ ASBESTOS ABT-GEN ALL 29.000 29.750 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.310 3.440 0.000 0.170 ASBESTOS ABT-MEC BLD 23.300 24.800 1.5 1.5 2.0 3.640 5.520 0.000 0.000 BOILERMAKER BLD 36.820 40.140 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.920 6.260 0.000 0.210 BRICK MASON BLD 32.050 35.260 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.650 6.340 0.000 0.440 CARPENTER ALL 34.320 35.820 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.560 4.860 0.000 0.490 CEMENT MASON ALL 35.400 36.650 2.0 1.5 2.0 5.430 4.400 0.000 0.150 CERAMIC TILE FNSHER BLD 25.450 0.000 2.0 1.5 2.0 5.000 4.350 0.000 0.100 COMM. ELECT. BLD 30.890 33.390 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.600 5.270 0.000 0.700 ELECTRIC PWR EQMT OP ALL 33.950 39.550 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.570 8.120 0.000 0.170 ELECTRIC PWR GRNDMAN ALL 26.480 39.550 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.130 6.330 0.000 0.140 ELECTRIC PWR LINEMAN ALL 33.950 39.550 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.570 8.120 0.000 0.170 ELECTRICIAN ALL 34.650 37.250 1.5 1.5 2.0 8.100 6.430 0.000 0.750 ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTOR BLD 38.995 43.870 2.0 2.0 2.0 7.275 3.420 2.340 0.370 FENCE ERECTOR ALL 24.840 26.090 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.650 6.740 0.000 0.000 GLAZIER BLD 30.000 31.000 1.5 2.0 2.0 6.090 8.450 0.000 0.500 HT/FROST INSULATOR BLD 31.650 33.400 1.5 1.5 2.0 7.260 8.360 0.000 0.230 IRON WORKER ALL 34.850 36.350 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.220 10.27 0.000 0.270 LABORER ALL 29.000 29.750 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.310 3.440 0.000 0.170 LATHER BLD 34.320 35.820 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.560 4.860 0.000 0.490 MACHINIST BLD 34.540 36.290 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.200 4.100 2.380 0.000 MARBLE FINISHERS ALL 25.050 0.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.220 6.340 0.000 0.570 MARBLE MASON BLD 32.050 35.260 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.650 6.340 0.000 0.570 MILLWRIGHT ALL 34.320 35.820 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.560 4.860 0.000 0.490 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 1 37.600 41.600 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.600 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 2 36.300 41.600 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.600 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 3 33.750 41.600 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.600 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 4 32.000 41.600 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.600 OPERATING ENGINEER FLT 1 42.700 42.700 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.000 OPERATING ENGINEER FLT 2 41.200 42.700 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.000 OPERATING ENGINEER FLT 3 36.650 42.700 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850 1. 800 0.000 OPERATING ENGINEER FLT 4 30.500 42.700 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.000 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 1 35.800 39.800 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.600 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 2 35.250 39.800 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850 1. 800 0.600 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 3 33.200 39.800 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.600 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 4 3 1. 8 00 39.800 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850 1.800 0.600 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 5 30.600 39.800 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.050 4.850. 1.800 0.600 ORNAMNTL IRON WORKER ALL 32.300 34.050 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.650 9.690 0.000 0.750 PAINTER ALL 32.100 36.110 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.550 4.900 0.000 0.340 PAINTER SIGNS BLD 25.530 28.660 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.600 2.040 0.000 0.000 PILEDRIVER ALL 34.320 35.820 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.560 4.860 0.000 0.490 PIPEFITTER BLD 35.000 37.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.410 5.600 0.000 0.650 PLASTERER BLD 31.000 32.500 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.240 6.100 0.000 0.400 PLUMBER BLD 37.100 39.100 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.250 3.440 0.000 0.590 ROOFER BLD 31.950 33.950 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.470 2.950 0.000 0.330 SHEETMETAL WORKER BLD 33.400 36.070 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.460 7.850 0.000 0.590 SIGN HANGER BLD 23.750 24.600 1.5 1.5 2.0 3.880 2.000 0.000 0.000 SPRINKLER FITTER BLD 34.500 36.500 1.5 1.5 2.0 7.000 5.550 0.000 0.500 STEEL ERECTOR ALL 34.850 36.350 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.220 10.27 0.000 0.270 STONE MASON BLD 32.050 35.260 1.5 1.5 2.0 5:650 6.340 0.000 0.440 TERRAZZO FINISHER BLD 26.200 0.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.750 4.750 0.000 0.220 TERRAZZO MASON BLD 30.050 32.550 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.750 6.150 0.000 0.120 TILE MASON BLD 31. 000 34.000 2.0 1.5 2.0 5.000 5.350 0.000 0.180 TRAFFIC SAFETY WRKR HWY 22.800 24.400 1.5 1.5 2.0 3.078 1.875 0.000 0.000 TRUCK DRIVER E ALL 1 28.050 28.700 1.5 1.5 2.0 4.500 3.300 0.000 0.000 http://www.state.il.us/agencylidol/rates/EVENMO/COOK9999.htm 5/24/2005 \.;UUl\. \.;UUIUY .1lvValUl1c, H aC,v IVI J Ullv .!.VVJ .1. "5'"" ~ UJ.. I TRUCK DRIVER E ALL 2 27.150 27.550 1.5 1.5 2.0 4.200 3.200 0.000 0.000 TRUCK DRIVER E ALL 3 27.350 27.550 1.5 1.5 2.0 4.200 3.200 0.000 0.000 TRUCK DRIVER E ALL 4 27.550 27.550 1.5 1.5 2.0 4.200 3.200 0.000 0.000 TRUCK DRIVER W ALL 1 27.900 28.450 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.350 3.100 0.000 0.000 TRUCK DRIVER W ALL 2 28.050 28.450 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.350 3.100 0.000 0.000 TRUCK DRIVER W ALL 3 28.250 28.450 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.350 3.100 0.000 0.000 TRUCK DRIVER W ALL 4 28.450 2 8. . 4 5 0 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.350 3.100 0.000 0.000 TUCKPOINTER BLD 33.500 34.500 1.5 1.5 2.0 4.210 5.840 0.000 0.400 Legend: M-F>8 (Overtime is required for any hour greater than 8 worked each day, Monday through Friday. OSA (Overtime is required for every hour worked on Saturday) OSH (Overtime is required for every hour worked on Sunday and Holidays) H/W (Health & Welfare Insurance) Pensn (Pension) Vac (Vacation) Trng (Training) Explanations COOK COUNTY TRUCK DRIVERS (WEST) - That part of the county West of Barrington Road. The following list is considered as those days for which holiday rates of wages for work performed apply: New Years Day, Memorial/Decoration Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day. Generally, any of these holidays which fall on a Sunday is celebrated on the following Monday. This then makes work performed on that Monday payable at the appropriate overtime rate for holiday pay. Common practice in a given local may alter certain days of celebration such as the day after Thanksgiving for Veterans Day.' If in doubt, please check with IDOL. EXPLANATION OF CLASSES ASBESTOS - GENERAL - removal of asbestos material/mold and hazardous materials from any place in a building, including mechanical systems where those mechanical systems are to be removed. This includes the removal of asbestos materials/mold and hazardous materials from ductwork or pipes in a building when the building is to be demolished at the time or at some close future date. ASBESTOS - MECHANICAL - removal of asbestos material from mechanical systems, such as pipes, ducts, and boilers, where the mechanical systems are to remain. CERAMIC TILE FINISHER The grouting, cleaning, and polishing of all classes of tile, whether for interior or exterior purposes, all burned, glazed or unglazed products; all composition materials, granite tiles, warning detectable tiles, cement tiles, epoxy composite materials, pavers, glass, mosaics, fiberglass, and all substitute materials, for tile made in tile-like units; all mixtures in tile like form of cement, metals, and other materials that are for and intended for use as a finished floor surface, stair treads, promenade roofs, walks, walls, ceilings, swimming pools, and all other places where tile is to form a finished http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/rates/EVENMO/COOK9999.htm 5/2412005 Cook County PrevaIlmg Wage tor June LOO) interior or exterior. The mixing of all setting mortars including but not limited to thin-set mortars, epoxies, wall mud, and any other sand and cement mixtures or adhesives when used in the preparation, installation, repair, or maintenance of tile and/or similar materials. The handling and unloading of all sand, cement, lime, tile, fixtures, equipment, adhesives, or any other materials to be used in the preparation, installation, repair, or maintenance ot tile and/or similar materials. Ceramic Tile Finishers shall fill all joints and voids regardless of method on all tile work, particularly and especially after installation of said tile work. Application of any and all protective coverings to all types of tile installations including, but not be limited to, all soap compounds, paper products, tapes, and all polyethylene coverings, plywood, masonite, cardboard, and any new type of products that may be used to protect tile installations, Blastrac equipment, and all floor scarifying equipment used in preparing floors to receive tile. The clean up and removal of all waste and materials. All demolition. of ex:isting tile floors and walls to be re-tiled. COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRICIAN - Installation, operation, inspection, maintenance, repair and service of radio, television, recording, voice sound vision production and reproduction, telephone and telephone interconnect, facsimile, data apparatus, coaxial, fibre optic and wireless equipment, appliances and systems used for the transmission and reception of signals of any nature, business, domestic, commercial, education, entertainment, and residential purposes, including but not limited to, communication and telephone, electronic and sound equipment, fibre optic and data communication systems, and the performance of any task directly related to such installation or service whether at new or existing sites, such tasks to include the placing of wire and cable and electrical power conduit or other raceway work within the equipment room and pulling wire and/or cable through conduit and the installation of any incidental conduit, such that the employees covered hereby can complete any job in full. MARBLE FINISHER Loading and unloading trucks, distribution of all materials (all stone, sand, etc.), stocking of floors with material, performing all rigging for heavy work, the handling of all mateiral that may be needed for the installation of such materials, building of scaffolding, polishing if needed, patching, waxing of material if damaged, pointing up, caulking, grouting and cleaning of marble, holding water on diamond or Carborundum blade or saw for setters cutting, use of tub saw or any other saw needed for preparation of material, drilling of holes for wires that anchor material set by setters, mixing up of molding plaster for installation of material, mixing up thin set for the installation of material, mixing up of sand to cement for the installatin of material and such other work as may be required in helping a Marble Setter in the handling of all material in the erection or installation of interior marble, slate, travertine, art marble, serpentine, alberene stone, blue stone, granite and other stones (meaning as to stone any foreign or domestic materials as are specified and used in building interiors and experiors and customarily known as stone in the trade), carrara, sanionyx, vitrolite and similar opaque glass and the laying of all marble tile, terrazzo tile, slate tile and precast tile, steps, risers treads, base, or any other materials that may be used as substitutes for any of the aforementioned materials and which are used on interior and experior http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/rates/EVENMOICOOK9999.htm page j or / 5/24/2005 ,-,'trJ'V..l""- ..........""'............"J .J. ... '"' v u...lJ...l~.lt:::J T T "6.... ..L""".... ... ............- _'-'VoJ which sare installed in a similar manner. TERRAZZO FINISHER The handling of sand, cement, marble chips, and all other materials that may be used by the Mosaic Terrazzo Mechanic, and the mixing, grinding, grouting, cleaning and sealing of all Marble, Mosaic, and Terrazzo work, floors, base, stairs, and wainscoting by hand or machine, and in addition, assisting and aiding Marble, Masonic, and Terrazzo Mechanics. TRAFFIC SAFETY work associated with barricades, horses and drums used to reduce lane usage on highway work, the installation and removal of temporary lane markings, and the installation and removal of temporary road signs. TRUCK DRIVER - BUILDING, HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION - EAST & WEST Class 1. Two or three Axle Trucks. A-frame Truck when used for transportation purposes; Air Compressors and Welding Machines, including those pulled by cars, pick-up trucks and tractors; Ambulances; Batch Gate Lockers; Batch Hopperman; Car and Truck Washers; Carry-aIls; Fork Lifts and Hoisters; Helpers; Mechanics Helpers and Greasers; oil Distributors 2-man operation; Pavement Breakers; Pole Trailer, up to 40 feet; Power Mower Tractors; Self-propelled Chip Spreader; Skipman; Slurry Trucks, 2-man operation; Slurry Truck Conveyor Operation, 2 or 3 man; TEamsters Unskilled dumpman; and Truck Drivers hauling warning lights, barricades, and portable toilets on the job site. Class 2. Four axle trucks; Dump Crets and Adgetors under 7 yards; Dumpsters, Track Trucks, Euclids, Hug Bottom Dump Turnapulls or Turnatrailers when pulling other than self-loading equipment or similar equipment under 16 cubic yards; Mixer Trucks under 7 yards; Ready-mix Plant Hopper Operator, and Winch Trucks, 2 Axles. Class 3. Five axle trucks; Dump Crets and Adgetors 7 yards and over; Dumpsters, Track Trucks, Euclids, Hug Bottom Dump Turnatrailers or turnapulls when pulling other than self-loading equipment or similar equipment over 16 cubic yards; Explosives and/or Fission Material Trucks; Mixer Trucks 7 yards or over; Mobile Cranes while in transit; Oil Distributors, 1-man operation; Pole Trailer, over 40 feet; Pole and Expandable Trailers hauling material over 50 feet long; Slurry trucks, 1-man operation; Winch trucks, 3 axles or more; Mechanic--Truck Welder and Truck Painter. Class 4. six axle trucks; Dual-purpose vehicles, such as mounted crane trucks with hoist and accessories; Foreman; Master Mechanic; Self-loading equipment like P.B. and trucks with scoops on the front. OPERATING ENGINEERS - BUILDING Class 1. Mechanic; Asphalt Plant; Asphalt Spreader; Autogradej Backhoes with Caisson attachment; Batch Plant; Benoto; Boiler and Throttle Valve; Caisson Rigs; Central Redi-Mix Plant; Combination Back Hoe Front End-loader Machine; Compressor and Throttle Valve; Concrete Breaker (Truck Mounted); Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Paver; Concrete Placer; Concrete Placing Boom; Concrete Pump (Truck Mounted) ; http://www.state.iI.us/agency/idollrates/EVENMO/COOK9999.htm ..&. -o-,.........a. , 5/24/2005 Cook County Prevailing Wage for June 2005 Concrete Tower; Cranes, All; Cranes, Hammerhead; Cranes, (GCI and similar Type); Creter Crane; Crusher, Stone, etc.; Derricks, All; Derricks, Traveling; Formless Curb and Gutter Machine; Grader, Elevating; Grouting Machines; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloader 2-1/4 yd. and over; Hoists, Elevators, outside type rack and pinion and similar machines; Hoists, one, two and three Drum; Hoists, Two Tugger One Floor; Hydraulic B.ackhoes; Hydraulic BOom Trucks; Hydro Vac (and similar equipment); Locomotives, All; Motor Patrol; Pile Drivers and Skid Rig; Post Hole Digger; Pre-Stress Machine; Pump Cretes Dual Ram; Pump Cretes; Squeeze Cretes-screw Type Pumps; Raised and Blind Hole Drill; Roto Mill Grinder; Scoops - Tractor Drawn; Slip-form Paver; Straddle Buggies; Tournapull; Trac:t6fwith Boom and Side Boom; Trenching Machines. Class 2. Bobcat (over 3/4 cu. yd.); Boilers; Brick Forklift; Broom, All Power Propelled; Bulldozers; Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over) ; Conveyor, Portable; Forklift Trucks; Greaser Engineer; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloaders under 2-1/4 yd.; Hoists, Automatic; Hoists, inside Freight Elevators; Hoists, Sewer Dragging Machine; Hoists, Tugger Single Drum; Laser Scrt;!edi Rock Drill (self-propelled); Rock Drill (truck mounted); Rollers, All; Steam Generators; Tractors, All; Tractor Drawn Vibr-aJ:ory Roller; Winch Trucks with "A" Frame. Class 3. Air Compressor; Combination - Small Equipment Operator; Generators; Heaters, Mechanical; Hoists, Inside Elevators - (Rheostat Manual Controlled); Hydraulic Power units (pile Driving, Extracting, and Drilling) i Pumps, over 3" (1 to 3 not to exceeq a total of 300 ft.); Pumps, Well Points; Welding Machines (2 through 5); Winches, 4 small Electric Drill Winchesi Bobcat (up to and including 3/4 cu. yd.) . Class 4. Bobcats and/or other Skid SteerL9a(:t~.I.s.; Oilers; and Brick Forklift. OPERATING ENGINEERS - FLOATING Class 1. Craft foreman (Master Mechanic), diver/wet tender, engineer (hydraulic dredge) . Class 2. Crane/backhoe operator, mechanic/welder, assistant engineer (hydraulic dredge), leverman (hydraulic dredge), and diver tender. Class 3. Deck equipment operator (machineryman), maintenance of crane (over 50 ton capacity) or backhoe (96,000 pOunds or more), tug/launch operator, loader, dozer and like equipment on barge, breakwater wall, slip/dock or scow, deck machinery, etc. Class 4. Deck equipment operator (machineryman/fireman), (4 equipment units or more) and crane mainteIlanc:e 50 ton capacity and under or backhoe weighing 96,000 pounds or less, assistant tug operator. OPERATING ENGINEERS - HEAVY AND HIGHWAY C()~E;'p~.Vc:J~9l-I Class 1. Craft Foreman; Asphalt Plant; Asphalt Heater and Planer Combination; Asphalt Heater Scarfire; Asphalt Spreader; Autograder/GOMACO or other similar type machines; ABG Paver; Backhoes with Caisson attachment; Ballast Regulator; Belt Loader; Caisson Rigs; Car Dumper; Central Redi-Mix Plant; Combination Backhoe Front Endloader Machine, (1 cu. yd. Backhoe Bucket or over or with http://www.state.il.us/agency/idollrates/EVENMO/COOK9999.htm Page.) ot I 5/24/2005 'Vvvr. "-,UUIHY J. IIJV'UU1l0 VV <:tOv IVI JUllv ,/..VVoJ attachments); Concrete Breaker (Truck Mounted): Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Paver over 27E cu. ft.; Concrete Placer; Concrete Tube Float; Cranes, all attachments; Cranes, Hammerhead, Linden, Peco & Machines of a like nature; Crete Crane; Crusher, Stone, etc.; Derricks, All; Derrick Boats; Derricks, Traveling; Dowell machine with Air Compressor; Dredges; Field Mechanic-Welder; Formless Curb and Gutter Machine; Gradall and Machines of a like nature; Grader, Elevating; Grader, Motor Grader, Motor Patrol, Auto Patrol, Form Grader, Pull Grader, Subgrader; Guard Rail Post Driver Mounted; Hoists, One, Two and Three Drum; Hydraulic Backhoes; Backhoes with shear attachments; Mucking Machine; Pile Drivers and Skid Rig; Pre-Stress Machine; Pump Cretes Dual Ram; Rock Drill - Crawler or Skid Rig; Rock Drill - Truck Mounted; Roto Mill Grinder; Slip-Form Paver; Soil Test Drill Rig (Truck Mounted); Straddle Buggies; Hydraulic Telescoping Form (Tunnel); Tractor Drawn Belt Loader (with attached pusher - two engineers); Tractor with Boom; Tractaire with Attachments; Trenching Machine; Truck Mounted Concrete Pump with Boom; Raised or Blind Hole; Drills (Tunnel Shaft); Underground Boring and/or Mining Machines; Wheel Excavator; Widener (APSCO). Class 2. Batch Plant; Bituminous Mixer; Boiler and Throttle Valve; Bulldozers; Car Loader Trailing Conveyors; Combination Backhoe Front Endloader Machine (less than 1 cu. yd. Backhoe Bucket or over or with attachments); Compressor and Throttle Valve; Compressor, Common Receiver (3); Concrete Breaker or Hydro Hammer; Concrete Grinding Machine; Concrete Mixer or Paver 7S Series to and including 27 cu. ft.; Concrete Spreader; Concrete Curing Machine, Burlap Machine, Belting Machine and Sealing Machine; Concrete Wheel Saw; Conveyor Muck Cars (Haglund or Similar Type); Drills, All; Finishing Machine - Concrete; Greaser Engineer; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloader; Hoist - Sewer Dragging Machine; Hydraulic Boom Trucks (All Attachments) ; Hydro-Blaster; All Locomotives, Dinky; Pump Cretes; Squeeze Cretes-Screw Type Pumps, Gypsum Bulker and Pump; Roller, Asphalt; Rotory Snow Plows; Rototiller, Seaman, etc., self-propelled; Scoops - Tractor Drawn; Self-Propelled Compactor; Spreader - Chip - Stone, etc.; Scraper; Scraper - Prime Mover in Tandem (Regardless of Size); Tank Car Heater; Tractors, Push, Pulling Sheeps Foot, Disc, Compactor, etc.; Tug Boats. Class 3. Boilers; Brooms, All Power Propelled; Cement Supply Tender; Compressor, Common Receiver (2); Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over) ; Conveyor, Portable; Farm-Type Tractors Used for Mowing, Seeding, etc.; Fireman on Boilers; Forklift Trucks; Grouting Machine; Hoists, Automatic; Hoists, All Elevators; Hoists, Tugger Single Drum; Jeep Diggers; Pipe Jacking Machines; Post-Hole Digger; Power Saw, Concrete Power Driven; Pug Mills; Rollers, other than asphalt; Seed and Straw Blower; Steam Generators; Stump Machine; Winch Trucks with "A" Frame; Work Boats; Tamper - Form-Motor Driven. Class 4. Air Compressor; Combination - Small Equipment Operator; Directional Boring Machine; Generators; Heaters, Mechanical; Hydraulic Power Unit (Pile Driving, Extracting, or Drilling); Hydro- Blaster; Light Plants, All (1 through 5); Pumps, over 3" (1 to 3 not to exceed a total of 300 ft.); Pumps, Well Points; Tractairei Welding Machines (2 through 5); Winches, 4 Small Electric Drill Winches. Class 5. Bobcats (all); Brick Forklifts, Oilers. Other Classifications of Work: http://www.state.il.us/agency/idollrates/EVENMO/COOK9999.htm 1. U5\..r V VJ. , 5/24/2005 Cook County Prevailing Wage tor June 2005 For definitions of classifications not otherwise set out, the Department generally has on file such definitions which are available. If a task to be performed is not subject to one of the classifications of pay set out, the Department will upon being contacted state which neighboring county has such a classification and provide such rate, such rate being deemed to exist by reference in this document. If no neighboring county rate applies to the task, the Department shall undertake a special determination, such special determination being then deemed to have existed under this determination. If a project requires these, or any classification not listed, please contact IDOL at 618/993-7271 for wage rates or clarifications. LANDSCAPING Landscaping work falls under the existing classifications for laborer, operating engineer and truck driver. The work performed by landscape plantsman and landscape laborer is covered by the existing classification of laborer. The work performed by landscape operators (regardless of equipment used or its size) is covered by the classifications of operating engineer. The work performed by landscape truck drivers (regardless of size of truck driven) is covered by the classifications of truck driver. http://www.state.il.us/agency/idollrates/EVENMO/COOK9999.htm .Page / 01/ 5/24/2005 kad 5/24/05 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION REQUESTING CLOSURE OF A PORTION OF CENTRAL ROAD IN ORDER TO CONDUCT A PARADE WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect desires to hold the annual Independence Day Parade on a portion of Central Road and Elmhurst Road (Route 83) in the Village of Mount Prospect on Monday, July 4, 2004; and WHEREAS, said parade will require closure of that portion of Central Road between Northwest Highway and Busse Road, the curb lane of Westbound Central Road between Busse Road and Arthur Street, and Elmhurst Road (Route 83) between Northwest Highway and Golf Road; and WHEREAS, the State of Illinois requires that the Village assume all responsibility and liability involved in the closure of said State roadways. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE 'OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect hereby requests the State of Illinois, Highway Department, to close Central Road between Northwest Highway and Busse Road, the westbound curb lane of Central Road between Busse Road and Arthur Street, and Elmhurst Road (Route 83) between NorthWest Highway and Golf Road between the hours of 1 :00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. in order to conduct the annual July 4th Parade, a copy of which parade route and requested roadway closures is attached hereto. SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect will assume full responsibility for the direction, protection and regulation of traffic during the time the detour is in effect and all liability for damages of any kind occasioned by the closure of the aforementioned roadways. SECTION THREE: That the Village of Mount Prospect will provide for efficient, all weather detour signs, to be maintained, conspicuously marked and judiciously patrolled by the Police Department for the benefit of traffic diverted as a result of the street closure requested herein. ~ Street closure Page 2/2 SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. Irvana K. Wilks Mayor ATTEST: Kimberly A. Dewis Deputy Village Clerk H:\CLKO\files\WIN\RESIClose streets-parade,2005.doc t p.............a...'... '.r,..'a' ..... "d"" ~e'" ......... ;<' ""...,:l: .. ,8 ": *-~:,._,,-, ;, .; 'r " -, 'l' ,..., ,,.-,.. -'0'...'" -,-...'.- _" _,_,', _0 " .. ',', ,t-,. ...".____....... 'c.' _, _._.,__,~ Parade starting time: 1 :00 P.M. Parade Route: Step off at Prospect Avenue and Maple Street West on Prospect Avenue to Central Road West on Central Road to Melas Park X:Administration\CIVEVNTS\4thof JulyParadeRouteMap