Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. OLD BUSINESS MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: MAY 13,2005 SUBJECT: PZ-10-05 - VARIATION & DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION 100 S. SCHOOL STREET (ST. PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH) GREG O'BRIEN / ST. PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH - APPLICANT The Planning & Zoning Commission transmits their recommendation to approve Case PZ-IO-05, a request for Variations and a Development Code exception for storm water detention, as detailed in the attached Staff Report. The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their April 28, 2005 meeting. The Subject Property, consisting of two parcels, is located at the southwest corner of Busse Avenue and School Street. The property located at 100 S. School Street contains the main church building, a one-story accessory structure (parsonage at 108 S. School Street), a parking lot and related site improvements. The property at 112 S. School Street contains an existing single-family residence with related improvements. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, reviewed the case. She noted the elements of the project that would require relief from zoning setback regulations and explained why Staff supported the Petitioner's request to provide storm water detention for the new impervious surface only. Greg O'Brien, representative of St. Paul Lutheran Church, reviewed how the current proposal differed from their previous proposal. He explained how the goals of the Church helped them arrive at the new, revised expansion proposal. Several neighbors addressed the Commission and stated their support for the Church expansion, but stated that the size of the expansion was inappropriate and that they felt it would adversely impact the neighborhood. Several neighbors stated their objection to the Church demolishing the residences to accommodate the addition and the parking lot. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the Petitioner's project at length. It was noted that a new house built to Village Code could have similar impacts on the adjacent properties because the new house's height may limit views and the amount of sunlight. One Commissioner stated his support of the requests and encouraged the Church to take a comprehensive view of the development of all its properties and prepare a long-range plan. There was discussion regarding the proposed storm water detention design and how the site currently does not have any detention, but the Petitioner would provide detention for the new impervious surface. Also, the P&Z Commissioners discussed lighting and how the proposed lights need to be shielded properly to minimize any adverse impacts on the adjacent properties. PZ-10-05 May 13,2005 Page 2 The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that the Village Board approve the Petitioner's request subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Report, with an emphasis on proper shielding for the lights. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their May 17,2005 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. Ijc H;\PLAN\Planniug & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2005\MEJ Mcmos\PZ~IO-OS MEJ CSl Paul Lullleran QlUrch cxpansion).doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-IO-05 Hearing Date: April 28, 2005 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 100 S. School Street PETITIONER/OWNER: St. Paul Lutheran Church 100 S. School Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 PUBLICATION DATE: April 13, 2005 PIN #s: 08-12-111-012&08-12-111-016 REQUEST: Petitioner is proposing to construct an addition to the existing church and expand/modify the existing parking lot. The Petitioner is seeking relief from Village regulations for the following: 1) required setbacks (Variation); 2) number of parking spaces provided on-site (Variation); 3) storm water detention (Development Code Exception); and 4) other relief from the Village Code as may be required for this project. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Arlene Juracek Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Marlys Haaland Ronald Roberts Richard Rogers Matt Sledz Keith Youngquist MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Ellen Divita, Deputy Director, Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Harold Bune; Bob Dooley; Barbara Dorolnig; Janet Doyle; Roy & Darby Halsaien; Dennis & Cynthia Higdon; Ronald Kloss; Brenda O'Brien; Peter Loeschke; Sue Miceli; Scott Moon; Roger & Melodie Van Dyke; Rev. Marc Schwichtenberg; Paul Seils; Rev. Kris Whitby; Charles T. Walsh; Jennifer Weisler; Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Richard Rogers moved to approve the minutes of the March 24, 2005 meeting and Leo Floros seconded the motion. The motion was approved 5-0 with abstentions by Chair Arlene Juracek, Richard Rogers and Keith Youngquist. Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-I0-05, a request to construct an addition to the existing church and expand/modify the existing parking 10t~ She said that this case would be Village Board Final. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, summarized the request. The Petitioner is seeking relief from Village regulations for the following: (a) required setbacks, (b) the number of parking spaces provided on~site, and (c) storm water detention requirements. The Subject Property, consisting of two parcels, is located at the southwest comer of Busse Avenue and School Street. The property located at 100 S. School Street contains the main church building, a one-story accessory structure and parsonage; at 108 S. School Street, a parking lot and related site improvements. The property at 112 S. School Street contains an existing single-family residence with related Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-10-05 Page 2 improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. The Petitioner is proposing a number of improvements to the site, including a 2-story addition to the existing church, which creates an open, interior courtyard, and an expansion of the existing parking lot. The proposed improvement would result in the demolition of the accessory structure at 100 S. School Street and the existing home at 112 S. School Street. The proposed 2-story building addition will match the Church's existing setback of 19.32' along School Street, which is less than the required setback of 20 feet. Therefore, they are seeking a Variation for the proposed exterior side yard setback. The Petitioner is also proposing an expansion of the existing parking lot. Although the site will include 21 additional parking spaces, creating a total of 52 on-site parking spaces, the Petitioner is seeking relief from the Village's zoning regulations for the amount of required on-site parking. In addition, the proposed parking lot requires variations from the RA District's minimum rear and exterior side yard setback requirements.. , The Petitioner proposes to provide storm water detention for the new impervious surface. However, due to the scope of the project, the Development Code requires that storm water detention be provided for the entire site. Therefore, the Petitioner is seeking an Exception to the Development Code regulations to allow storm water detention for the new impervious surface only. The Petitioner has included a detailed Facility Usage chart that outlines the various activities that occur at the Church and the estimated number of participants. Based on the "Net Change in Use" information submitted, the facility may experience some parking deficiencies. It is important to note that the facility currently does not meet the Village's parking requirements and occasionally experiences parking shortages. During those occasions when on-site parking is not available the Church's parishioners can either park on the school property or park on the street. The proposed addition will meet the interior side yard setback requirement; however, it will encroach slightly into the exterior side yard. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow the addition to encroach 8" into the required yard in order to maintain the Church's existing setback. The existing setback cannot be considered a legal nonconformity for the addition because the intensity of the addition exceeds the limitations listed in the Zoning Ordinance and new construction is required to comply with zoning regulations. Currently, there is a vacated alley along the west lot line that is used as a secondary means of access to the existing parking lot. The existing parking lot extends up to the lot lines on both the east and west sides of the Subject Property. The Petitioner's plans indicate that the vacated alley access point will be abandoned and that landscaping will be installed along the entire west lot line. The new parking lot will have a 15.8' setback along the west lot line. The Petitioner's plans show two parking lot driveways: one entrance and one exit, and striped accordingly. The parking lot currently extends to the east lot line; however, the Petitioner proposes to create a 10' setback and landscape islands to separate the driveways. Although the parking lot currently does not comply with zoning regulations, a Variation is required for the proposed setbacks because the parking lot intensity changes and it can no longer be considered a legal non-conformity and allowed to remain with a zero setback. In reviewing this request it is important to note that the Village's height restrictions within residential zoning districts are measured to the mid-point of the roof (except for buildings with flat roofs). The existing building height measures 4 I' at the top of the ridge. Although the proposed addition has a height of approximately 36' to the peak of the roof, the height to the mid-point of the roof is 27'. It should be noted that although the height restrictions within the RA District apply only to residential buildings, Staff has applied the same height restrictions to the proposed Church addition. Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-IO-05 Page 3 The Petitioner submitted a lighting plan that shows the proposed light levels and type of fixture. The information submitted does not comply with Village regulations. However, the Petitioner has not requested a Variation from the Village's lighting regulations and has not provided justification for a Variation. Therefore, the lighting plan must be revised to comply with Village Code requirements. The Police Department recommended that the Petitioner install a perimeter fence along the west and south lot lines of the Subject Property. The fence would minimizeentrance/exit points and help eliminate thefts to vehicles. The Petitioner confirmed that there are existing fences along the west lot line, which create a continuous fence line. The Petitioner has agreed to pursue an arrangement with the property owner south of the Subject Property to install a fence that meets the Police Department's requirements and is acceptable to the Property Owner. The standards for a Variation are listed in the V ill age Zoning Ordinance and include specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. They relate to: a hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; lack of desire to increase financial gain; and protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner is proposing to add a 2-story addition to increase the efficiency and general comfort of the Church's daily operations. As part of the project, the Petitioner would demolish two structures to accommodate the construction of the addition and parking lot expansion. The Petitioner designed a parking lot that would provide the maximum number of parking spaces possible. The existing parking lot is currently built to the lot line, but the proposed parking lot will include landscape setbacks. These landscape areas will minimize the impacts of the parking lot on the adjacent properties. In addition, the 8" Variation needed for the exterior side yard would be in keeping with the existing setback and maintain the character of the building. Based upon the scope of the improvements, the Development Code requires that the entire site be brought into compliance. However, the Petitioner proposes to provide storm water detention only for the new impervious surface. The Village's Engineering Division reviewed the Petitioner's proposal and found that the site slopes predominantly west to east. Consequently, stormwater runoff from the site, as well as runoff entering the site from the properties along Elm Street, is conveyed east across the site. This flow enters the storm sewer system in School Street unrestricted; no stormwater detention currently exists on site. Engineering concurred with the Petitioner's engineering report that states providing the storage as described would create adequate storage volume for the area to be improved for the runoff generated by a 100-year storm. This volume would equate to providing storage volume for the entire site for the runoff generated by the 25-year storm. Engineering also concurred that the cost involved and the disturbance to the areas intended to remain outside the scope of the project could be significant if storm water detention must be provided for the entire site. However, the design submitted indicates the proposed stone fill, back filling around the detention chamber, would be included with the detention calculations. Village policy prohibits the inclusion of the stone fill as part of the storage volume calculation. Therefore, in order for Staff to support the Petitioner's request to provide detention for the new impervious surface only, the storm water detention design would need to be reconfigured so the calculations do not include the stone fill as part of the storage volume. This may include, but is not limited to a larger detention chamber, increasing the depth of the detention chamber, or a new design. The Village Code permits the Planning & Zoning Commission to recommend approval of exceptions to Development Code regulations in cases of hardship, "caused by conditions uniquely attributable to the land under consideration, would be imposed upon an applicant by compliance with these regulations and upon a finding that there are alternate feasible means of fulfilling the purpose and spirit of the regulations to protect the public health, safety and welfare...". Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-10-05 Page 4 The request must meet the standards for an exception. The standards relate to: a hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; lack of desire to increase financial gain; and protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The site currently does not provide storm water detention and the Petitioner would provide detention for the new impervious surface. Staff reviewed the request and found that a reasonable effort has been made to comply with Village Code requirements, but that site constraints limited the Petitioner's ability to provide above grade detention. In addition, the site will be well below the maximum amount of permitted lot coverage. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend the Village Board approve Variations for 1) the amount of parking, 2) the proposed setbacks, and 3) a Development Code exception to allow the Petitioner to provide storm water detention for the new impervious surface only for the Subject Property, subject to the following: I. Consolidating the Subject Property into a single lot of record; 2. Revising the lighting plan to comply with the Village's lighting regulations; 3. Revising the landscape plan to reflect existing fences and the proposed fence along the south lot line; 4. Meeting the Building Code & Fire Code requirements for Fire Protection that include the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm; 5. Complying with all other Development Requirements, as defined in Section 15.402 of the Village Code, which include: a) The installation of streetlights within the public right of way adjacent to the site; and b) Paying a fee for the planting of parkway trees in the public right of way along the site (this fee is $400 per tree, and shall be based upon the number of planting sites determined by the Village's Forestry Division). Three gentlemen were sworn in: Rev. Marc Schwichtenberg, Senior Pastor at St. Paul, 21 S. Owen St., Greg O'Brien, St. Paul's Building Committee, and Greg Goss, Architect. Rev. Marc Schwichtenberg said the case is about people; not a building and he introduced Greg O'Brien, Chairman of the Building Committee. Mr. O'Brien showed a power point slide presentation and highlighted changes made since the August 2004 zoning meeting. He noted the concerns and issues discussed at that meeting and noted how the Building Committee addressed the issues. He compared the previous addition elevations to the new proposed elevations and noted how solutions to the objectionable height and other issues were incorporated into the new design. He reviewed the landscape design and showed where new plants would be planted and how shrubbery would be used to screen and shield neighboring properties for privacy and from light. He reviewed changes to the parking lot traffic pattern improvements. Mr. Roberts asked if Mr. O'Brien had aerial graphics of the school location. He said that he did not, but eXplained the school location in relation to the church. Ms. Juracek presented a petition from Mr. Robert Black and questions from Ms. Janet Doyle, both posing the question why additional parking is needed when, as late as last Sunday, many empty spaces were noted in both the church and school parking lots. Mr. O'Brien responded that he realized that nobody wanted to see buildings torn down to make room for parking, especially in a residential area, and if they were building a new church in a new area it wouldn't be necessary; the church would be built with the necessary size parking lot next to it. But this church is 90-years old and they have one parking lot next to the church and one parking lot a block away. And the parish being 90 years old, so are many of its parishioners, who cannot walk that extra block, especially in the weather extremes that we experience in this area, so oftentimes they choose to stay home rather than attend church. Ms. Juracek brought up the question posed by petitioners that, rather than razing single-family homes, those should be used to house staff meetings. Mr. O'Brien said they have scattered staff all over in various storage, broom closets and classrooms, basements and sub-basements and have found that to be counter-productive a.nd, given the ADA requirements, it would be very expensive to make those homes handicapped accessible. Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-I0-05 Page 5 Greg Goss, Architect with Goss/Pasma Architects, came to the dais to answer Richard Rogers' questions regarding storm retention and assured the Commission they would meet Engineering's requirements. Ms. Juracek thanked Mr. O'Brien on his presentation and asked for questions from the audience. Robert Black, 119 S. School Street, was sworn in. Mr. Black said he didn't know where Mr. O'Brien came from, but where he came from he didn't call walking across a parking lot a hardship and he didn't approve of razing two perfectly viable residential homes for parking spaces and also, the size of the structure is too large. Neighbors would not object to parishioners parking on the streets. Perhaps the Church could compromise and tear down just one home. He is not at member of the congregation, but has been inside the facility and they seem to have enough space for meetings. Melodie VanDyke, 123 S. School St., was sworn in. She said she has lived there for 25 years and has been a parishioner for 10 years. She said she is so concerned about demolishing two homes to accommodate the Church expansion that she may leave the St. Paul Lutheran parish. She stated that it's not a Lutheran campus and that there are other ways to accommodate the Church's needs without tearing down homes. Bill Reddy, 105 S. Elm St., was sworn in. He said this was not about anger, confrontation, or the Church, it was about community. They are a tight knit community and the Church has not done the proper outreach to the community. He described the meetings held by the church for the neighborhood as inadequate. He said the two homes needed to be town down to provide water detention area for the 8,175 sq. ft. addition proposed by the church. He said that for his property it was necessary to spend over $4,000 in landscaping trying to block the light from the Church's parking lot. He concluded by passing out pictures of his backyard to the Commission. Ann Doyle, author of the earlier referenced e-mail, came up and passed out pictures of many empty parking spaces in the existing lots. She said she did not think 7 parking spaces were worth tearing down 2 houses. Jennifer Weisler, 111 S. Elm St., was sworn in and testified that she lives behind the Church parking lot and will be deprived of sunlight because of the building height and stated that the addition would decrease her property value. Robert Kleinke, 102 S. Elm, member of St. Paul for 35 years, was sworn in and said the Church has always supported community events. The Prayer Garden is open to everybody to use. The c.hanges in the Church are for (physically challenged) people like him, who cannot walk to Church anymore. Peter Loeschke, 101 S. Elm, was sworn in and showed a picture of the proposed Church and said he thought it was a beautiful Church and appreciated that they had lowered the height of the Church and increased the landscaping and hopes the Church can find a way to bring the neighborhood together. Greg O'Brien came forward again to address the lighting issues. He said the parking lot lighting is at a bare minimum. They have worked with staff on a photometric plan to reduce the amount of glare. With regard to the windows facing Elm St., the windows will be shaded and the offices are not occupied evenings and weekends when people are home and most in need of privacy. There is only a fire exit planned for a former driveway in back of the Church. Mr. Floros asked him if there would actually only be 7 more parking spaces as he has been hearing. Mr. O'Brien said, no, they are going from 21 spaces to 52. He further emphasized that they needed the improvements they were requesting. Richard Rogers said there are shields that can be put on the lights on the parking lot. Mr. O'Brien said he would work with the lighting contractor on that item. Roger Van Dyke, 523 N. Main St., was sworn in. He said that the lighting issue is very minor, and that his sister, Melodie's, concern about tearing down houses, is a major issue. They shouldn't be allowed to build higher than surrounding homes and block the sunlight from the yards. He also said they don't need meeting rooms, they have a huge gymnasium in which to hold meetings. Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-I0-05 Page 6 Matt Sledz said the Church had done an honorable job in responding to the earlier objections to this expansion; however, he does not feel they have effectively proven a hardship to be granted relief from Village Code. Leo Floros said the Church is a good neighbor. He noted that much has been said about demolishing two homes and observed that St. Mark demolished at least four homes for its Church expansions. He thinks St. Raymond's and St. Emily's may have also torn down homes to build their additions. He said he has no problem at all in supporting this request, which he feels will be good for the community. Richard Rogers said St Paul's owns the property and has the right to improve the property as they see fit and they need the parking near to the Church. He said putting in storm water detention will benefit the neighborhood and he also supports St. Paul in this expansion project. Keith Youngquist said this proposal was a definite improvement over the previous proposal, but he thinks the west elevation of the new addition would be improved if it were a stepped elevation on the southwest side and he had concerns with regards to that area in the rear that abuts to the yards of the homes on Elm and School Streets. He thinks most people prefer more open space near their back yards and it would alleviate negative feelings if the Church could open it up. He said this was not a demand but if the Church could look into it that would be good. He said the Church did a great job with the presentation tonight. Joe Donnelly said he was pleased to see the building height reduced and the mechanicals relocated from the previous request. He said the two houses could be torn down just as easily to build new, larger homes. Ronald Roberts said he agrees with all the comments made by the other Commission members and hopes the Church will strive to promote future harmony in neighborhood by looking at all parcels and all their needs to minimize the impact on the neighbors. Ms. Juracek said she was glad to see the height of the building reduced and said the open south end provides balance on the north end. She said the additional green space adds to the neighborhood balance. Ms. Juracek also noted that churches needed to function differently today than before; that there was definitely a need for adult gathering spaces and meeting rooms. Richard Rogers made a motion to recommend approval for: I) a Variation to allow a 25.2' rear yard setback for the parking lot; 2) a Variation to allow a 19.32' exterior side yard for the building addtiion and a 10' exterior side yard for the 'parking lot; 3) a Development Code exception to provide storm water detention for the new impervious surface only; and 4) Variation for the amount of on-site parking to allow the expansion and modification of the church and parking lot for the property at 100 S. School St., St. Paul Lutheran Church, Case No. PZ-50-04, with all the conditions imposed by staff and the further condition that shields be placed on the parking lot lights. Joseph Donnelly seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Donnelly, Floros, Roberts, Rogers, Sledz, Youngquist and Juracek NAYS: None Motion was approved 7-0. Joe Donnelly made a mot.ion to adjourn at midnight, seconded by Richard Rogers. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 10-05 LOCATION: 100 - 112 S. School Street PETITIOl'.'ER: St. Paul Lutheran Church OWNER: St. Paul Lutheran Church PARCEL #: 08-12-106-106-0000 & 08-12-106-018-0000 LOT SIZE: 1.36 acres (59, 243.95 square feet) ZONING: RA Single Family Residence LAND USE: Church & Single Family Residential REQUEST: Variations & Development Code Exception LOCA TION MAP Central Road 1 2 1 3 4 , 5 6 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 \ 16 \7 18 21 S1. P..1 22 L_'lwnll x"'" - .. \UI .. .. Vi .. 'E.. ~ ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 -L. 10 11 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 II 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 11 0:; 101 100 .. L- Owen Park Vi c; it 0 III III 113 114 117 116 118 11 119 113 110 120 -1!!L 200 200 IOJ.!O$ --ur- 203 202 -;;;;- 106 10S 104 207 106 ~ -12L- 209 208 _ 210 _~~ 2'i'2 211 210 213 111 ! I ~ ~! r --m- 21S I -.- -11T ---m- 217 116 -un 11 118 I 120 ~2l=- ~ .." - 22l .. .. MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENEJURACEK,CHA~ERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: APRIL 21, 2005 HEARING DATE: APRIL 28, 2005 SUBJECT: PZ-10-05 - V ARIA nONS & DEVELOPMENT COPE EXCEPTION 100-112 S. SCHOOL STREET (ST.PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the April 28, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by St. Paul Lutheran Church (the "Petitioner") regarding the properties located at 100 & 112 S. School Street (collectively the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner has requested approval of the following: 1) Setback variations for the proposed building addition and parking lot; 2) Variation for the number of parking spaces provided on-site; and 3) A Development Code Exception regarding storm water detention. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the April 13, 2005 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted Public Hearing signs on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property, consisting of two parcels, is located at the southwest comer of Busse Avenue and School Street. The property located at 100 S. School Street contains the main church building, a one-story accessory structure (parsonage at 108 S. School Street), a parking lot and related site improvements. The property at 112 S. School Street contains an existing single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered on all sides by the RA District. The Subject Property is across the street from Owen Park, which is a neighborhood park that includes playground equipment and ball fields. The school, owned in conjunction with St. Paul Lutheran Church, is located at the northwest comer of Busse Avenue and School Street. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner is proposing a number of improvements to the site, including a 2-story addition to the existing church. which creates an open, interior courtyard, and an expansion of the existing parking lot. The proposed improvement would result in the demolition of the accessory structure at 100 S. School Street and the existing home at 112 S. School Street. The following is a brief summary of the proposed improvements: ~ Building Addition - The proposed 2-story building addition will match the Church's existing setback of 19.32' along School Street (which is less than the required setback of 20 feet). Therefore, they arc seeking a Variation for the proposed exterior side yard setback. )> Parking Lot Expansion - The Petitioner is also proposing an expansion of the existing parking lot. Although the site will include 21. additional parking spaces, creating a total of 52 on-site parking spaces, PZ-10-05 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 28, 2005 Page 3 the Petitioner is seeking relief from the Village's zoning regulations with regards to the amount of required on-site parking. In addition, the proposed parking lot requires variations from the RA District's minimum rear, interior and exterior side yard setback requirements. (Please note that there are approximately 30 on-street parking spaces in front of the Church and the park.) >- Storm Water Detention - The Petitioner proposes to provide storm water detention for the new impervious surface. However, due to the scope of the project, the Development Code requires that storm water detention be provided for the entire site. Therefore, the Petitioner is seeking an Exception to the Development Code regulations to allow storm water detention for the new impervious surface only. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE Currently the site does not comply with the Village's zoning regulations and portions of the existing Church encroach into the required setbacks. The following table compares the Petitioner's proposal to the Zoning Ordinance requirements. RA District Minimum Requirements Existin2 Proposed Required Action SETBACKS: Front 30' 20.62' No Change None Interior 14' Building: 8' Addition: 25' None Parking Lot: 0' Parking: 15.8' None Exterior 20' Building: 19.32' Addition: 19.32' Variation Parking Lot: 0' Parking Lot: 10' Variation Rear 27' . 10' 25.2' (parking lot) Variation . LOT COVERAGE 75% Maximum 57.1% 66% No Action STORM WATER Detention for the Development Code DETENTION Full Detention None New impervious Exception only I space per 3 worshipers - PARKING 219 (with 8 day care spaces) 31 52 . Variation Parking - The Petitioner has included a detailed Facility Usage chart that outlines the various activi ties that occur at the Church and the estimated number of participants. Based on the "Net Change in Use" information submitted, the facility may experience some parking deficiencies (primarily during weekend services and special events). It is important to note that the facility currently does not meet the Village's parking requirements and occasionally experiences parking shortages. During those occasions, when on-site parking is not available, the Church's parishioners can either park on the school property (located immediately north of the site) or park on the street. Setbacks - Building: Addition - The proposed addition will meet the interior side yard setback requirement; however, it will encroach slightly into the exterior side yard. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow the addition to encroach 8" into the required yard in order to maintain the Church's existing setback. The existing setback cannot be considered a legal nonconformity for the addition because the intensity of the addition exceeds the limitations listed in the Zoning Ordinance and new construction is required to comply with zoning regulations. PZ-IO-05 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April Page 4 Setbacks - Parking Lot - Currently, there is a vacated alley along the west lot line that is used as a secondary means of access to the existing parking lot. The existing parking lot extends up to the lot lines on both the east and west sides of the Subject Property. The Petitioner's plans indicate that the vacated alley access point will be abandoned and that landscaping will be installed along the entire west lot line. The new parking lot will have a 15.8' setback along the west lot line. The Petitioner's plans show two driveways: one entrance and one exit, and striped accordingly. As previously noted, the parking lot currently extends to the east lot line; however, the Petitioner proposes to create a 10' setback and landscape islands to separate the driveways. Although the parking lot currently does not comply with zoning regulations, a Variation is required for the proposed setbacks because the parking lot intensity changes and it can no longer be considered a legal non-conformity and allowed to remain with a zero setback. Building Height - In ~eviewing this request it is important to note that the Village's height restrictions within residential zoning districts are measured to the mid-point of the roof (except for buildings with flat roofs). The existing building height measures 41' at the top of the ridge. Although the proposed addition has a height of approximately 36' to the peak of the roof, the height to the mid-point of the roof is 27'. It should be noted that although the height restrictions within the RA District apply only to residential buildings, Staff has applied the same height restrictions to the proposed Church addition. Lighting Plan The Petitioner submitted a lighting plan that shows the proposed light levels and type of fixture. The information submitted does not comply with Villageregulations. However, the Petitioner has not requested a Variation from the Village's lighting regulations and has not proVided justification for a Variation. Therefore, the lighting plan must be revised to comply with Village Code requirements. Fence The Police Department regoD1I11e!"ldedthattl1e":petiti()ner il1.st~ll a perimeter fence along the west and south lot lines of the Subject Property. The fence would minimize entrance/exit points and help eliminate thefts to vehicles. The Petitioner confirmed that there are existing fences along the west lot line, which create a continuous fence line. The Petitioner has agreed to pursue an arrangement with the property owner south of the Subject Property to install a fence that meets the Police Department's requirements and is acceptable to the Property Owner. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: . A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; . Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and . Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner is proposing to add a 2-story addition to increase the efficiency and general comfort of the Church's daily operations. As part of the project, the Petitioner would demolish two structures to accommodate the construction of the addition and parking lot expansion. The Petitioner designed a parking lot that would PZ-1O-05 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 28, 2005 Page 5 provide the maximum number of parking spaces possible. Staff supports the proposed design subject to incorporating the recommendations previously listed. The existing parking lot is currently built to the lot line, but the proposed parking lot will include landscape setbacks. These landscape areas will minimize the impacts of the parking lot on the adjacent properties. In addition, the 8" Variation needed for the exterior side yard would be in keeping with the existing setback and maintain the character of the building. STORM WATER DETENTION - DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION Based upon the scope of the improvements, the Development Code requires that the entire site be brought into compliance. However, the Petitioner proposes to provide storm water detention only for the new impervious surface. The Village's Engineering Division reviewed the Petitioner's proposal and found that the site slopes predominantly west to east. Consequently, stormwater runoff from the site, as well as runoff entering the site from the properties along Elm Street, is conveyed east across the site. This flow enters the storm sewer system in School Street unrestricted; no stormwater detention currently exists on site. Engineering concurred with the Petitioner's engineering report that states providing the storage as described would create adequate storage volume for the area to be improved for the runoff generated by a 100-year storm. This volume would equate to providing storage volume for the entire site for the runoff generated by the 25-year storm. Engineering also concurred that the cost involved and the disturbance to the areas intended to remain outside the scope of the project could be significant if storm water detention must be provided for the entire site. However, the design submitted indicates the proposed stone fill, back filling around the detention chamber, would be included with the detention calculations. Village policy prohibits the inclusion of the stone fill as part of the storage volume calculation. Therefore, in order for Staff to support the Petitioner's request to provide detention for the new impervious surface only, the storm water detention design would need to be reconfigured so the calculations do not include the stone fill as part of the storage volume. This may include or is not limited to a larger detention chambers, increasing the depth of the detention chamber, or a new design. DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION STANDARDS Sec. 15.109 pennits the Planning & Zoning Commission to recommend approval of exceptions to Development Code regulations in cases of hardship, "caused by conditions uniquely attributable t6 the land under consideration, would be imposed upon an applicant by compliance with these regulations and upon a finding that there are alternate feasible means of fulfilling the purpose and spirit of the regulations to protect the public health, safety and welfare...". The request must meet the standards for an exception, which are listed in Sec. 15.109 and are summarized as follows: · A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; · Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and · Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The site currently does not provide storm water detention and the Petitioner would provide detention for the new impervious surface. Staff reviewed the request and found that a reasonable effort has been made to comply with Village Code requirements, but that site constraints limited the Petitioner's ability to provide above grade detention. In addition, the site will be well below the maximum amount ofpennitted lot coverage. PZ-10-05 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting April 28, 2005 Page 6 RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend the Village Board approve Variations for 1) the amount of parking, 2) the proposed setbacks, and 3) a Development Code exception to allow the Petitioner to provide storm water detention for the new impervious surface only for the Subject Property, subject to the following: 1. Consolidating the Subject Property into a single lot of record; 2. Revising the lighting plan to comply with the Village's lighting regulations; 3. Revising the landscape plan to reflect existing fences and the proposed fence along the south lot line; 4. Meeting the Building Code & Fire Code requirements for Fire Protection that include the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm; 5. Complying with all other Development Requirements, as defined in Section 15.402 of the Village Code, which include: 1. The installation of streetlights within the public right of way adjacent to the site; and 11. Paying a fee for the planting of parkway trees in the public right of way along the site (this fee is $400 per tree, and shall be based upon the number of planting sites determined by the Village's Forestry Division). The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I P, Director of Community Development Ijc H:\PLAN\Planuing & ZOlling COMM\P&Z 200S\Slaff Mcmo\PZ.1 0-05 MEMO (100 S, School 51 Paul V AR de\' code rcsub),doc " -VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Planning Division 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, l1Iinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Variation Request ^ . "'-'qi'S:;,'l::',;,i1_'~>:"i-;d~;i' 'ii- -, ";~v)>''';;;-',;.-_A: The Planning & Zoning Commission has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and those variation requests that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's Zoning Ordinance. PETITION FOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW Village Board Final Z Case Number 0 pz- - 05 ... ~ ,~7-' ",-,,' ,',--',-,-',-'" " ~:B Development Name/Address ~ = O~ Date of Submission ~ t"I Z!.': ....... ><~ \iIil Hearing Date ~ Z ... --" '" z o - !- <: :; ~ o """ z ... \iIil ~ - rLI z o - !- <: ~I 0_ """ !:: Z ~ - .- Qo. Z 0.. ;;;.< 01 ~ c.,:, ~ u <: == Common Address(es) (Street Number, Street) 100 S. School Street Tax I.D. Number or County Assigned Pin Nllmber(s) 08-12-106-0000 08-12-106-018-0000 Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) SEE PLAT OF SURVEY (ATTACHED TO SUBMITTAL) Name ST. PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH Telephone (day) 84'7.255.0332 Corporation Telephone (evening) Street Address 100 S. SCHOOL STREET Fax 847.255.0948 City State MOUNT PROSPECT IL Zip Code 60056 Pager Interest in Property --;-- r z. o E: < ~ ~ ~ ~ zo - >. Q 1: Z Il) ;:;J g- O ... o::P-. ~I ~ U < =0 Z 91 Eo- en <(;; ~ .~ o ,ri ~- z. e _P-. Q"E: ;z Il) ;J E o g- o::~ ~ > ~ Il) UO <I =0 Name ST. PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH Corporation Street Address 100 S. SCHOOL STREET City State MOUNT PROSPECT IL Developer Name Address Attorney Michael J. Moran & Associates Name Mik~ MQrlul ! Address 121 S. Vlilkt Road" Snite 291 Arlington Hts., IL. 60005 Surveyor Edward J. Molloy & Associates Name .John Molloy Address 1230 Mark Street Bensenville,IL 60106-1022 Engineer Patrick Engineering Name Mathew Bardol Address 4970 Varsity Drive Lisle, IL Architect Goss Pasma Architects Name r.rpgory r.oo;:o;: Address 1691 SherlHftH An. Evanston, IL. 60201 Landscape Architect Name Address Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 Zip Code 60056 Telephone (day) 847.255.0332 Telephone (evening) Fax: Pager Telephone (day) Fax Telephone (day) Fax Telephone (day) Fax . Telephone (day) Fax 847.255.0948 630.595.2600 630.595.4700 630.795.7200 630.434.8400 Fax Telephone (day): 847.475.1250 Telephone (day): Fax 2 847475 1290 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Code Section(s) for which Variation(s) is (are) Requested Summary and Justification for Requested Variation(s), Relate Justification to the Attached Standards for Variations Second Appearance to Board to present a refined scope of work and address several issues of concern to Village and neighbors. ~I!;E AI I ACHED MEMU DA I ED (March II, ZOO5) SUMMARY OF REQUESTED MODIFICATIONS Q ~ I) Variation of Parking reQuirements- ~~ Existing site is non-conforming with the required parking spaces. The proposed development increases the parking O~ (from 10 to 'i 1 ~r~I'p.>:) ~v~il~hlp. c1irp.r.tly ~c1j~l'p.nt to thi<: ~itp., hut f~ll>: >:hort ofthp. rp.quirp.mf'nt Thf' nf'W r~rk;t1g will >~ ~O accommodate normal facility usage during the week as shown on a current weekday schedule of activates in the Church -<~ (OrigiRallj' 6~bmittllg). :t~ :t~ :JO 2) V". ;al;vlI vf r ". k;l11:5 Lol SelLa..k - 00- Eo-< Request for relieffrom 20' side yard setback will provide additional parking spaces, Side yard is in fact School Street and U -< across from park. Set back vanance WIll not Impact residential neIghbors. Proposed parkmg lot requIres vanauons from RA District minimum rear, interior and exterior side yard setback requirements to maximize parking count yet provide adequate landscapmg and buffers. 3). Building addition variation of side yard setback to match existing buildings setback (Requested 19 12' I Required 20feet) 4) "ariatiQQ gf~torm 'Vater DeteRtiQR Request for consideration to provide detention for the new developed area rather than the entire site. 01 igin"l Subll,;llal (See rAt. ;,k Lllgiheel ihg Ju!.titkl1tiOH Md Cl1J..dlc'l:t;oH!.) , . Please note that the application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted to the Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the 3 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for' visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. " ,') '. . "0 \ Applicant~) (t,~" l,; \ l~ c..J l.\.,>.:\k .~(: \''\ C' (t.l:J( ~. \ -- Date t\\Q.:;'l: h. Z -:>j '7 CC ') I f applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner "' h",. i ) ~ }. . Date I \' \l..~-C M. ~. ') , . l. CO _}. Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 4 TDD 847.392.6064 Memo Date: March 11, 2005 To: Community Development Department - Planning Division RE: Saint Paul Lutheran Church Issue: Summary of Requested Modifications At the August 26,2004 Zoning Commission meeting, the Commission requested that the Petitioner, St. Paul Lutheran Church, consider making several changes to the proposed Church Addition before putting the proposal to a final vote. Below are the issues that were raised at. the meeting and our Resolutions. 1. Parking Lot Traffic Flow. It was requested that we redesign the traffic flow to restrict to one direction of traffic flow for safety concerns. Resolution: The Parking lot was redesigned for one lane of traffic. Curb cutouts were modified to restrict traffic to one direction. Reducing the lanes had the added benefit of reducing the overall parking lot expansion and the corresponding setback variance. 2. Parking Lot Lighting: Several neighbors raised concerns about the height of the two (2) light poles in the original submission. Resolution: The revised plan calls for 4-parking lot lighting poles @ -15' high. 3. Elevation of Proposed Addition. Although the original proposed building elevation was already within current Village Codes, there was concern from the neighbors that the peak of the roof was too high for a residential area. Resolution: Subsequent design changes required that the entire elevation of the Addition be lowered several feet in order to align its Main floor with the existing Church structure. In addition, the slope of the Addition's roofwas decreased, which further lowered the roof peak. The addition building height has been lowered from original proposal apex of 48' to 36' -0" above grade level. 4. Location of Mechanicals. One of the neighbors raised a concern about the location of the HV AC compressor units and the associated noise during operation. Resolution: The compressors have been located on the roof of the Addition on a screened flat roof area. The sidewalls of this area are designed to appear from street level as a sloped roof. These sidewalls also serve as an effective sound barrier for the compressors. Page 1 of2 Memo ) 5. Courtyard Security. The original U-shaped design raised concerns about maintaining security in the resulting courtyard. Resolution: The revised design closes the U-shape and creates an interior courtyard that is closed to the public with access from inside the building. 6. Tree Survey: The original plans submitted did not include a tree survey and a listing of mature trees that will be lost to construction. Resolution: A tree survey was conducted by an accredited Forester and incorporated into the site plan. Furthermore, the submitted Landscaping design includes replacements for the number of trees removed during construction. 7. Exterior Materials: The original submission already contained materials allowed under the Village code. However, concerns were raised by the Commission and neighbors regarding the Addition's appearance and how it would blend with the existing Church structure. Resolution: All elevations are now full-height masonry, with all street-side elevations completely clad in stone to match the existing church structure. This requested improvement represents a nearly six-figure cost increase to the Congregation. Page 2 of2 q b.O '" <) '"0 ... o ... <) q ~ " b.O q ... <) <) q b.O q <) " <) ... ;j u <) .c: u ... '" MEMO GOSS/PASMA ARCHITECTS . 1601 Sher....." Avenue Pc,,~J..o_ Sul~e Eva"ston, 1II1""t. 60201 ph. 8.7.475.1250 (". 847..75.U90 Date: 06.Apri1.2005 To: Community Development Department - Planning Division Re: Saint Paul Lutheran Church PZ-10-05/ 100 S. SCHOOL STREET Issue: Response to Village Staff Review Pursuant to your review, dated April 4, 2005, of the above-mentioned zoning application, the following is our response to each item we have corrected or rnodifi~d for aciditignal staff review: ENGINEERING DIVISION In reply to your request, attached is information indicating the 'Stormtech' underground detention system will provide the proposed 11,500 cubic feet of storage volume. The online Stormtech Calculator was used to determine the area of underground system necessary to provide the specified volume. Attached are selected pages from the Stormtech Design Manual and a copy of the output data sheet from the Calculator. The selected pages show specifics regarding the chamber/aggregate fill system. The Calculator data indicates that a system of chambers and aggregate with a bed area of 8421 sq. ft. will provide 11,500 cubic feet of storage. The system shown on Drawing C-3 has an overall area of 8710 sq. ft. POLICE DEPARTMENT It has been the Church's' intention to work with the neighbors to coordinate fencing along the west lot line with gated access to behind the sanctuary in the north west comer of the site. The Church feels that since the south lot line will be bermed and buffered the landscaping would be a more desirable separation with the south residence. The Church will coordinate with the south neighbor for the most desirable solution. PLANNING DIVISION . IS' poles were used to throw light further away and reduce the amount of poles needed to get the proper light levels for minimum safety standards. Bollards are typically only three feet high and have very poor light performance. Bollards are OK to use for delineation of an entrance, but not for a complete parking area. . A photometric plan of the parking lot lightinghas been prepared and hereby attached in an (8-1/2"x 11") format, along with a cut sheet of the proposed fixture, for your reVIew. . We have resubmitted the owners' narrative in a Memo dated 08.Apri1.2005, along with a daily calendar of normal facility usage currently and proposed. Also attached is a summary ofthe projected parking totals. . We have attached the 'Yard Requirements' from Sheet A1.1 and bubbled the proposed setbacks compared to the required setbacks. We also bubbled the existing building Mean heights and the proposed addition Mean height and height to top of ridge. · Concerning the west lot line, we don't foresee the trees proposed being any more of a conflict with the power lines than what already exists. If the trees are pruned properly and on a regular basis (i.e. not topped off), there should be very little conflict. Sincerely, ~oss GossPasma Architects attachments ~..;...<.;o...........:. ~,. '~,;. . -"":(':"':1~:~~\~"T~{;..::";-' . ,'.:":'-':,;',;>:<.'.<. .:,' \.': ,...,': "04/07/05 THll 11',36. FAX._..6_3_0__...4_3_.4... 8400 .' .... PATRi<;KENGINEERING.. - .. w~r..N ~.t'.t'H;';dU\)Uli, tnottfiWalel' management 141003 Page 1 of2 IrQRt&DlBr/lngiD8ln, Des~e~/Cost , Site Calculator Enter the Required Storage Volume, select a Stormlech System, and select the appropriate Storage VolUme per Chamber and the cakulator will approximate the total system size and cost needed. ~.stonIsfs VGWm., Itoflll'lk/l ~i ~ ~p"CII.mb8n (\CC..,Jr:;U!ilr", ~~J ft3 L~~~ _ ~5. ?_CF wI1.~" of s~~n~ b~~~+" Number of Chambers Needed: Required Bed Size: * Quantity of Stone: * Volume of Excavation: * Area of filter fabric: * ~23 i 18420.61 _~ ft2 IS75.0? r YdsJ L~2.9.31 ~..J Tons [gQ.8.02 J Yds3 IT929:.~. ....J Yds2 Chambers; Stone: Quantity fg~.,.__..,..J 1959.31 I 11208.02 J hg?~.19 .........1 Excavation = Filter Fabric: Cost1 $l~~._.J / unit** $112.00 J / ton $[10.00 l / yard $@.~..J / yard Total $r~1,~~Q,~.J $[11,511.72 _~J $11 2.080.~O J $'~.~.~.6~.,_,..._J 1 Call1"SSB-296-S367 for estimated chamber pricing, * Includes 10% overage for bed perimeter Subtota/l $1~~.~~.Q;2.!>_J ~t pet' f:C3: $l~.20 .. .._.1 Forgeneral estimate purposes only, Contact Stormtech for costs on speclflc projects and associated variables. Does not reflect changes In geographicClI costs or contractors overhead, profit and other mIscellaneous expenses. ......Chamber costs may not be Inclusive of shipping. About I Product LIne I SUpport Center I Request Info I Site Map I Home 'f~1f~~~ ~:~.;~~. ~ \fr~~~~i~~:z~: .. Engineers , DesIgn/Cost .. CAD Drawings - Site Calculator . Cost ComparIson . DesIgn 'Manual ~ rtequest Education Seminar . Industry Links ~ FAQ's .' Devefopers .. l.!'lstallet$/ Cont..actors . Regularoty Officials "Resoutce Tools StorrnTech LLC 20 Beaver Road SUIte 104 ' Wethersfiefd, ConnectlCl 06109 (P) 888-S92.-2694 (F) 860~529-8040 Info@stormtech.com Requell3t l'nDr~ info llbout StlllrmTech u'}~r.~ The advanced design of Storm Tech's Gold~ chambers allows stormwater professionals to create more profitable, environmentally sound developments. Compared with other subsurface systems, Storm Tech's innovative chambers offer lower overall installed costs, superior design flexibility and enhanced long-term performance. $tiJlpCS!rro@f{' C)e$~gtro tFQe}{iQ;j~~~frW for Optimal land Use StormTech chambers are ideal for commercial, municipal, industrial and residential applications. Our chamber systems can function as stormwater detention, retention, "firsHlush" storage systems or a combination of these. They can also be designed into beds or trenches of various configurations, Unlike the costly fittings and bulk heads of pipe systems, our end caps allow fast and cost-effective row termination. Trimmable chamber lengths aI/ow our systems to hI! designed around all types of limiting boundaries. Typical Cross Section Detail (not to scale) Product Features and Benefits The advanced features and innovative technology of StormTech chambers streamline .instal/ations while lowering overall installed costs. StormTech chambers offer these unique benefits: . Isoration Chamber System'. dramatically reduces costs associated with piping manifolds, while isolating sediment to manageable areas for ease of maintenance. " Compliance with local regulations and NPDES Phase I and II requirements. .. Two people can install chambers quiCkly and easily, saving time and mOhey. . . Extensive product research & development and rigorous testing ensure reliability and pertormance. .. Versatile product design accommodates a variety of cost- effective system configurations. .. The chambers' length can be cut in 6.S-inch increments and end caps can be easily secured for flexibility in design and installation. o The subsurface chamber system facilitates various design requirements for detention, retention and recharge of stormwater. · Products are produced in our ISO 9001 :2000 certified manutac~ turing facility. "Injection mOlded at polypropylene ensures precise control of wall thickness and resistance to environmental stress cracking. . Distinctive gold chambers reflect the sun's energy to retain their integrity at the most crucial pOint ot installation. For more information on StarmTec!7's Isolation Chamber System. contact your local Storm T8ch representative. !ONO CAP - . - WELL"GRADED GRANULAR BACI<;FILL WHICH CONTAINS AN EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF PARTIOllj SIZES WITH NO MORe THAN l:i!'7'o PASSING THE #200 SIEVe; COMPACTED 'to A MfNIMUM OF 95% OF THE STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY, SEE THe: TABLE OF ACCEPTABLE FI LL M~TeRIALS IN $TOAMTE:C~I'S DESIGN MANUAL, INSTALLATION MANUAL, OF! WWW.STORMTECIi.COM. CHAMBER \ 1. 2-INCH WASHE.O, ~ \ CRUSHED. ANGULAR STONE \ PAVEMEIIIT . J _m_'''l j-FOR UNPAVED INSTAlLArlONWHERE AUTTINGFlllOM __ tJ L..~, V~HI~lE3 MAY OCCl,JR, INCREASE' COVEA TO 24.INCH~S. .~'1 J"-'-'-<--C..L.LL.l..L.t'{ZZZZZ;:ZZZZZLZZZZZZ222_ I ' I I 18' 96' - - MIN.- MAX. ~~. t 1 I SC.74Q - 30. SC-31 0 _16M DEPTH OF STONE TO BE OETERMINI:D BY DESIGN ENGINE!EJ~. MIN. 80-740_ 51' SC.310.34" 12" MIN. TYP. SC.740 and SC-31 0 C~l11ber Specifications TIle StonnTech SC.740 chamber opUmizes storage vo/~m" In relalively small fuotprints by PrOviding 2.211'1ft' (minimum) of storage. This can decrease ""cavaUon, backfill and associated com. The Storm Tech SC.310 chamber Is ideal for systems requiring low-rise and wide- span SOlutions. The chamber allows the stDnlge of lalg<l VOlumes, 1.3 ft' /1t' (minimum), at minimum depths. StormTeCh SC-740 Chamber (not to scale) Nominal Chamber SpeOifications Size (W x H x Instal/ad l) 51.0' x 30.0" x 85.4" Chamber Storage 45.9 ft3 Minimum rnstalled Storage. 74.9 tr Weight 74.Q Ibs ~ 24' OfA. MA>(. SC- 740 end cap . - ---- - :tormTsch SC-310 Cham er lot to sea e aminal Chamber l6cifications re (W x H x Installed l) .0' x 16.0" x 85.4" Imber Storage 7W ;rnum Installed Storage" ~ I ft' *' '3 s. 7 fi ...... Jht Ibs' 12" orA. MAJ(. SC--310 end cap ---- ~,~ J 2 - 5"""""0:- /,)C:~......, C H/ItIA>14c..___. aSSUmA<: .. ~:_:_ ACCEPTs 4" SCH 40 PIPE FOA r- OPTIONAL INSPf;Ci/ON 1>ORT \' J~ J.{ ~ '~ j{- rr ~ ~ !{ k'1 w }l{ Q r :.... ( "- ~ ~ "'" ~ ri;s ( H l-< )-f lLJJ }( H . l~ Hi )11... 11., }{ \4 ,l t- : ~90.7'lOA _ ---J 1-------:-- 85.4" fNSTALL!=D _ ~-I SC-740 chamber ACCEPTS 4" SCH 40 PIPE FOR r- OPTIONAlIN&PECTION POFlr '. '" ( '}i 'f, >< ,!,J, ~ ~ )( X X rJJ.. J.I ~ r; II / " m ~ I... C .H. }G X }( ill H }oj i1 ).( i1 ~ Jt, 1.H \ t- ---I 90.7' lOA _" r 85,4" INSTALLED" -j SC.::t1n :~-___'u_ 04/07/u5 THU 11:38 FAX 630 434 8400 10..0' System Sizing PATRICK ENGINEERING I4l 006 For quick calculations, refer to the ,Materials Worksheet on StormTech's website at www.stormtech.e()m. ~ O. ~ SYSliM SiZiNG The following steps provide tne calculations necessary to size a system. The worksheet on page 17 itemizes these calculations and costs. If you need assista.nce determin- ing the number of chambers per row or customizing the bed configuration to fit a specific site, calf Stormlech's Technical Services Department at 1~88-892-2694. 1} Oetermlne the amount of storage volume (Vs) required. It is the des;gnengineer's sole respoQsibility to deter- mine the storage volume required by local codes. TABLE 7 - storage Volume Per Chamber Barl Chamber 'and Stllne Chamber Stone Foundation Depth Storage 6" 12" 18" stormTech SC-740 StormTech SC-310 45.9 14.7 74.9 31.0 Not8: Storage volumes are in cubic feet per chamber. Ass/lmes 40% porosity tor the stone plus the chamb8r volume. 2} Determine the number of chambers. (e) required. To calculate the number of chambers needed for adequate storage, divide the storage volume (Vs) by the volume of the selected chamber, as follows: C = Vs/VoJume per Chamber 3} Determine the requIred bed sl:ze (S). To fjnd the size of the bed, multiply the number of chambers needed (C) by either: StormTech SC-740 bed area per chamber:::: 33.8 ff StormT~ch SC-310 bed area per chamber = 23.7 ft' S = (C x bed area per chamber) ... (1 toot x bed perimeter In feet) NOTE: It is necessary to add one foot around the perimtJter of the . bed for end taps and working sp~ce. 88.4- 40.4 4) Determine the amount of stone (Vst) required. TABLE 8 - Amount of stane Per Cltamber In Tons '.~ StOriS FoundatIon Det:lih 5" 12" 18" StormTech SC~740 3.8 (2.8 yd3) 4.6 (3.3 yd~) 5.5 (3.9 yd3) StormTech 5C-31 0 2.1 (1.5 yd3) 2.7 (1.9 yd~) 3.4 (2.4 ydl) - Note: ASSumes 6 inches of stone above, and betw(ffln chambers. To calculate the total amount of washed, crushed angu- lar stone required, multipfy the number of chambers (c) by the selected tOlis of stone from Table 8. NOTE: Washed. crushed angular stone is also required around the perimeter of the system. S} Determine the volume of excavation (Ex) required. 6) Determine the area of filter fabrIc (F) req~'red, TABLE 9 - Volume of Exca~tion Per Chamber Stone Foundation Death 6" 12" 18" " StormTech SC.740 5.5 6.2 6.8 SlormTech SC.310 2.9 3.4 3.8 "\ Note: Volumes are in c(Jbic yards per chamber. Assumes 6 Inches of separation between chamber rows and 18 inches of cover. The vol- ume of exoavation will vaIY as the depth of the cover IncreaSes. Each additIonal foot of COver will add a volume of excavation of 1.3 cu. Vds. psr SC-740 and 0.9 cu. yds. per 8C-31D chamber. The bottom and sides of the bed and the top of the angUlar stone must be covered with a non-woven geot- extile (filter fabric) that meets AASHTO M288 Class 2 reqUirement. The area of the sidewalls must be calculat- ed and a 2-foot overlap must be inCluded where two pieces of fifter fabric are placed side-by-side or end-to- end. Geotextiles typically come in 15 foot wide rolls. 7) Determine the number of $nd caps (Ed reqUired. Each row of chambers requires two end caps. Ec = number of rl)W.s ;( ;2 U"" .'( I 16 Call Storm Tech at 888.892.2894 or visit our websJte at www.stormtech.com for tflr.hnk:::.! ;:lnl'i nrnrl,.r-t infNrT\"';"~ ".r I ! i 0./71 0.261 0.31 0." OM 0.67 boB4 10.5/ I 0~5ll ',' 0.21 o.JO 0.47 o.~ 0.71 1.22 "'4 0.45 0.29 "0.21-~ o.z8 o..u 0.45 0.6/ 0.93 /.67 0.73 0.5/ 0.36 0.29 0.23 I'" I Ir <Q <Q O.W-,,;n 0.68 0.5/ r.69 1.22 0.88 0.49 0.83 1.51 0.66 0.54 I ,1.80 0.77 0.74 0.62 Bit---- 0.77 O.~ 0.56 1.54 0.66 0.54 /.05 0.85 0.52 0.59 0.49 0..17 '\ __0.15 ~25 ! ~ - - - " .. 0.20 0.19 0.<'6 O.~, O.W -0.611 : :~I 0.40 ----._--- 04' .';ff--tt.90 0.73 0.58 0.5/ 0.39 B ; 0.96 ! ;/.70 0.76 0.60 0.6/ 0.77 0.83 '1- 0.77 ! /.29 /.25 0.60 0.85 "" /.09 i !--- 0.60 1 a.B' 1.02 0.76 0.64 0.79 1.62 ; 0.:;3 ,0.66 0.80 0.78 0.76 ,"--- 0.55 10.58 0.84 0.76 0.69 O.~ '0.89 1.14 0.77 0.60 0.79 : ,.1 :5!--.!.:!.9 0.58 0.88 ! I, 7" n7.1 /.12 '. B :i "'I~...... 1./6. ...__"'" 0.59 O.~ 0.6/ 0.~1 0.45. 0.69 \\.50. 0.5/ // , O.:et 0.26 0.29, \0.46 ~-- 0.80 ./.46 0.78 ", ", POINT BY POINT FOOTCANDLE LEVELS 0.6/ 1.09. I 0.52 o.~ 1.0/ --T' I I 0.72 O'ls o.s I I I';;' ;d:l:. :L:.t 0.[ - L._.. 11 " 0.57 'I!d I .1:1': It!I' . Ii'," ___.._._... 038 '111.". __. "W"" . ===p'lr ~ _. . 1 III!: :,.-.... \ !I_=~._ 1"1'1.___ '.-- .... 1I '!i~~=~:.:~~-::~;~~jl t -:-:-~~_..." - ._"._-~"_.:":==:d.! 0.20 0./6 . --, I ..!I i...____h__.JL. n L II ~. I, I I I I U: PlANE : PL 1 POINT SPACING LEFT -TO-RIGHT = 10ft POINT SPACING TOP- TO-BOTTOM = 10ft LOWER LEFTHAND CORNER OF PLANE: X = 4857 Y = 4860 Z = 0 UPPER RIGHTHAND CORNER OF PLANE: X = 5016 Y = 4998 Z = 0 UGHT METER IS NORMAL TO PlANE .." I I. AVERAGE fc = .66 MAXIMUM fc = 1.92 MINIMUM fc = .11 AVERAGE/MINIMUM = 6 MAXIMUM/MINIMUM = 17.45 TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS = 208 PROJECT NAME: ST.PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH OTY. LABEL LUMINAlRE DESCRIPTION / MOUNTING HEIGHT LUMENS 4 8 1 / ACORNH 2A24-F13-RF3-175-MH / ON 15' POLES HOOO PREPARED BY: ..... -on BE'ACON PRODUCTS 1=32' RSZ 2A Acorns ',:.;:' ',::, ;.M,iJlage,Gollcctioti- ,;,;..::::i . '"' "'- ,"'>--....,p'" ,~ " ,~.. -... " - WJ t..."t.. i" r .~ ;. . :.-.;,.!. ;. [,ill: ~'i,::: , : '~r\;'-~ : : - : :', ' .L.~ .\~... ! i I \ . : j-; ! ;1-...;....," i ,~_.' ! 1 , . , ; ...i... L .' i,! :....;.....1.; Features '," ; The luminaire shall be ETL and CSA listed and sl1itable for wet location. i' ."", 'j'''S' The teardrop shape of this !uminare is one of the 111()st creative and effective lighting solutions for h()t~l~, sh()ppillg se.n.ter~,. Pllf:~~~':.,I~si4~J:l9fts"." universitieslihd otfrer pllblic access ~i'6jects. ' The optional spiral banding enhances its basic " classic design, .,;..;. 1"";" T . ~.. _r" l : i "Tn'T" ; f ;'"1" . ;" ':~ i : '.. i,. . ". "i. ...~...i. ...r .i......i.;, . 1""t :; l '!"'; ; .... '. '. ~ ~ ; . . .\ IIFI-).:L!'! the housing / lens holder ring shall be made of ....+i ,;i i ;' ASTM 356,2 virgin ingot aluminum and shall be ::~ cast in permanent molds for greater strength, '! ' un.ifonnity and sharper detail. It shall mount to a post top or bracket by means of a 3" J.D. Slip fi,tter hub secured by three stainless steel set strews. 1;he optical assembly shall be a borosilicate glass refractor with symmetrical or asym- 111etrical light distribution. Options shall include upper reflectors, louvers, or refractive lens. " <'fhe/en~I,o$ttre',$paU"be:a ,'pQlycarbp1latj;i; Or acrylic clear textured, refractive or white finish with an amphorae (acorn) shape and optional tWist-lock lamp access. The ballast assembly shall be unitized and iiltegraIly mounted to a cast aluminum tray. The electrical component is a high power factor CWA designed to operate up to a 250 watt HID, medium or mogul base lamp (by others) at -20 degrees F. All mounting fasteners and brackets shall be stainless steel/nonferrous for future serviceability. The finish shall be a thennoset polyester power coating applied over a sandblasted surface with a8 stage immersion chromate conversion and pretreatment process. .". , -. , . n,imensions: Part Number ALFxx2A 18 ALFxx2A21 ALFxx2A24 Width 11" 13" 15" Height 18" 21" 24" E.P.A 1.10 1.20 1.40 N,(}te: xx indicatesfitter selection Shown with Centennial A Post BEACON PRODUCTS INC . 6503 19TH STREET EAST . SARASOTA, SPPCIPlC AT!ONS SIIlUEr.TTO CHAN(]E wl'rnmrr NOTICE. VL-12A 2A Acorns Ordering Guide (Checkappropriateselections) OptiQ..t:1l_0ptions o (RFS) Type V Borosilicate Glass Refractor* I!!lJl o (RF3) Type III Borosilicate Glass Refractor* ~ ] "'5I:" W ~ Lens Options. o (ACT) Acrylic Clear Texture o (PCT) Polycarbonate Clear Texture o (PWT) Polycarbon8te Texture White* D (AF3) Acrylic Refractive Type III** o (AF5) Acrylic Refractive Type V** o Other 'Recommended with fluorescent lamps Note: "2A24 only . , . ..!....:...i.t... :-~ ! .: r,.~.,". ej~rfn ; o (HSS) Houseside Shield* 0 90. 0 180. o (LVR2) Type V Optilouver Reflector** j--,.,:.;,._---\ o (UPR) UpJight Pan Reflector** o Other Note: · 2A21 & 2A24 only ** 2A24 only Light Source Options 02A18 D2A21 02A24 Fitter Options o 70MB o 100MH o 150MH o 175MH o 250MH o 70HPS o 100HPS o 150HPS o 250HPS OINC o PL26W o Other D=lvlediu/1/ base lamp. G=Mogul base lamp N/A=Nor AlIailable N/A D 0 N/ ADD N/ ADD N/A D D N/A N/A G N/A 0 D N/ ADD NI ADD N/A N/A G D D 0 G24q-3 G24q-3 G24q-3 Electrical Options o (FS 1) Fused (Single, in pole, 120 or 277 voltage) o (FS2) Fused (Double. in pole, all other voltage) o (QD) Quick Disconnect o (PEe) Photoelectric Control (SpecifY voltage) r-..___n"---'l I I " " td o F12-2A18 Height = 675"" 1...____-------1 '--cT o F5-2A21 Heigh/ = 5.50" o F13-2A21 o F13-2A24 Height = 7.50" Finish Options 5iondord selections are lightly texlured sCltinfinishes. See data section for finishing specifications. o (WHT) White o (BLK) Black o (BRZ) Bronze o (VER) Verona o (GRE) Green o (ORA) Gray o Other Premium o Custom Color (Color chip required) , -, (~-:-~~.:~~.? r---------, ~r ~ o F21-2A21 o F21-2A24 Heigh! = 10.00" (.u.._._.~ '~~f{f1}f D F22-2A2l o F22-2A24 Heiglll = 8.25" 1'- -- "1 'Wf' TI LJ o F29-2A21 o F29-2A24 He(~ht = 7.011" Voltage Options 0120 0208 0240 0277 0 *480 0120/277 o *QUAD wired at o Other *Some wCluage / vol/age combinations may not be availa/JIe, please consultfClctO/y. Notes: [:::--====:J (~.--f:f) BalJa~t ~~r ii7U\ (. f6Cl I=,~~~ W o FIO-2A24 0 F45-2A24 Height = /8.00" Heigh/ = 11.511" Bnllnst Door & Twist Lock 1~':-":':::=-7 i~~;S,:;;o~ ~C7 1li]t( o F46-2A24 Heigh! = /2.75" Style Options ~(, 0.,:..\ A ,."... ". '~j';: .r''':! ~ o (~B) Brass Band '01,.. . .... ,.;.,.,-. ....,\ 7' .j ..'.:' ." ..: o (FBB) Fini,J & Bm" ~'n; f):d. D (FDB) Finial 1 Dome & Brass Band ',',/ . .".( A Dr L) ti... (I (' .) t-j J ~ \__/ tl~' W .A._ if 1-1' ~~ rY7iJ ! -" 'Y"D'Y , Wall Mount Twin Post Mount f- (Shown with AW-561) (ShaWl! with AA-562) r- :-;'-''1--:--j-~r--r----'''''-T':'''- I Example:F22-2A21/ peT /100MH120-D / HSS90 / FS1/ BKT / (ff'applicable) FitterJ Le;;;J SourceJv;;;;J 'CSockeA-Optic-;;CElectricaA--Finish '-Style / / / / / / Part No: Specifier Name: Specifier Signature: (Plcase Print) Date: BEACON PRODUCTS INC. 65031911-1 STREET EAST. SARASOTA, FL 34243 . PH 941-755-6694 . FAX~ 941-751-5535 SPECIFICATIONS SU13JECTTO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. VL-12E t:1 b.O <Jl II) "0 ... o ... II) t:1 oCj b.O t:1 ... II) II) t:1 b.O t:1 II) II) ... ;:l u II) ..... ..c:: u ... <<l MEMO GOS5/PASMA ARCHITE.CTS !!l 1601 Sh~rman Av.nu. Pentho.... Suit. Evan.ton. IIIlnol' 601\01 ph. 847.475.1250 f". 847.475.1290 Date: 08.April. 2005 To: Community Development Department - Planning Division Re: Saint Paul Lutheran Church Issue: Proposed Project Narrative Saint Paul Lutheran Church has long had a need for two critical improvements to its facilities: a multi-purpose Fellowship Hall and expanded parking next to the church. This need has only grown larger as a result of two major changes taking place in our church. First, our congregation's renewed emphasis on small-group bible studies, community outreach, and mission work has increased the use of the church facilities beyond the traditional Sunday morning activity. The net result has been an increase in our use of the church facilities during non-peak hours on weekdays and evenings. However, the types of activities taking place do not require the use of the Sanctuary, but rather meeting rooms and gathering places. This has also severely limited our ability to accommodate the many requests we receive from community groups to use our facilities because of the lack of proper meeting rooms. The second significant trend we are experiencing is a split in our membership demographics, having both older long-time members and new families with small children. Accommodating the needs of these diverse groups requires additional parking immediately adjacent to the church. In light of these needs, it is sadly ironic that we are being forced to ask the Village for a zoning variance for fewer parking spaces. In an ideal world, we would be adding as much parking as we could. Unfortunately, our location within a mature residential neighborhood, with its rapidly rising home values and infrequent home sales, makes this unfeasible. Therefore, the revised proposal before the Zoning Board will increase our church parking to 51 from the current 30 spaces is a significant accomplishment for us. These new 21 parking spaces are in addition to the 60 spaces that already exist at our school. In addition to the added parking spaces, we are redesigning the traffic flow inside the parking lot to ensure that it empties southbound on Sunday mornings. This will integrate with the special traffic ordinances the Village has established for the two blocks on School Street in front of the church and school. Furthermore, ample street parking exists during peak usage on Sunday mornings, since Owen Park across the street from the church is empty at that time of day. MEMO We would be remiss if we did not point out that the community already benefits from our church parking lot, as it is the de facto public parking lot for Owen Park during every baseball game played there. Frankly, this has created problems at times, as our members are often forced to park blocks away when they arrive for evening services or events. We have resisted repeated calls from some of our members to close our church parking lot during these times, as other churches in the area do on a regular basis. We do not believe that is an appropriate response to a community that prides itself on friendliness and that is so supportive of its local churches. Given the challenges of our situation, the immediate benefit to the community and our best efforts to meet all of the Villages many requirements, we respectfully ask that the Village grant a variance on it's parking requirements and set backs for the building proposal under consideration. Sincerely, Gregory 0 'Brien, Chairman St. Paul Lutheran Church and School Saint Paul Lutheran Church Normal Facility Usage Currrent Hours Mouday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday '. Friday Saturday 8:00 . 10:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study 15 Bible Study 30 Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total 10 Total 2S Total 40 Total 10 Total 10 Total - 10:00 - 12:00 Sanctuary 45 Sanctuary 30 Sanctuary - Sanctuary 45 Sanctuary - Sanctuary 30 Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - MinistryMtg - - Total 5S Total 40 Total 10 Total SS Total 10 Total 30 12:00 - 2:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total - 2:00 - 4;00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary 75 Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 7S 4:00 - 6:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary . - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study . Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study . Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total 10 Tntal 10 Tntal 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total - 6;00 - 7:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary 100 Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall . Staff .. Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Bible Study .. Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total - Total - Total - Total - Total - Total 100 7:00 - 9:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary 15 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hajj . Fellowship Hall . Fellowship HaJl - Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Bible Study 10 Bible Study 25 Bible Study 15 Bible Study 10 Bible Study - Bible Study . Ministry Mtg 15 Ministry Mtg ~ Ministry Mtg 15 Ministry Mtg 15 Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total 2S Total 40 Total 45 Total 2S Total - Total - Hours Sunday 8:00 - 9:30 Sanctuary ]20 Fellowship Hall Bible Study - - Total 120 9:30 - 11 :00 Sanctuary 300 Fellowship Hall - Bible Study 20 Total 320 11:00 - 12:00 Sanctuary 100 Fellowship Hall - Bible Study - - Total 100 12:00 - 6:00 Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall Bible Study - - Total - 6:00 - 9:00 Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall - Bible Study 25 Total 25 Notes: Funerals can occur on any day, typically in the morning on Monday through Saturday. There are typically 1.2 funeral services held per week and 3 weddings per month. Saint Paul Lutheran Church Normal Facility Usage Proposed Hours Monday Tuesday Wedoesday Thursday Friday Saturday 8:00 - 10:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship flail - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff JO Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study 15 Bible Study 30 Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg '. Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry'Mtg - - Total 10 Total 25 Total 40 Total 10 Total 10 Total - 10:00 - 12:00 Sanctuary 45 Sanctuary 30 Sanctuary - Sanctuary 45 Sanctuary - Sanctuary 30 Fellowship Hall . Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible ~tudy - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg . Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total 55 Total 40 Total 10 Total 55 Total 10 Total 30 12:00 - 2:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall 25 Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall 25 Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall 25 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study . Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - - Total 10 Total 35 Total 10 Total 3S Total 10 Total 2S 2:00 - 4:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary 75 Fellowship Hall . Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall . Fellowship Hall - Fellowship HalJ 25 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study . Bible Study - Bible Study . Ministry Mtg Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg . Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - - Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 100 4:00 - 6:00 Sanctuary . Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff 10 Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total 10 Total - 6:00 - 7:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary 100 Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg .. Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total .. Total - Total - Total - Total - Total 100 7:00.. 9:00 Sanctuary - Sanctuary .. Sanctuary 15 Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall .. Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall - Fellowship Hall 50 Fellowship Hall 75 Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff - Staff . Staff .. Dible Study 30 Bible Study 35 Bible Study 30 Bible Study 30 Bible Study - Bible Study - Ministry Mtg IS Ministry Mtg 15 Ministry Mtg 15 Ministry Mtg 15 Ministry Mtg - Ministry Mtg - - Total 45 Total 50 Total 60 Total 45 Total 50 Total 75 Hours Sunday 8:00 .. 9:30 Sanctuary 120 Fellowship Ra\1 - Bible Study - - Total 120 9:30 - 11 :00 Sanctuary 300 Fellowship Hall - Bible Study 20 Total 320 11 :00 .. 12:00 Sanctuary 100 Fellowship Ha\1 30 Bible Study - - Total 130 12:00.. 6:00 Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall 30 Bible Study - - Total 30 6:00 - 9:00 Sanctuary - Fellowship Hall 20 Bible Study 25 Total 45 Notes: Funerals can occur on any day, typically in the morning on Monday through Saturday. There are typically 1-2 funeral services held per week and 3 weddings per month. Saint Paul Lutheran Church , Normal Facility Usage ,- Current Facility . Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 8:00 - 10:00 10 25 40 10 10 - 8:00 - 9:30 120 10:00 - 12:00 55 40 10 55 10 30 9:30 - 11:00 320 12:00 - 2:00 10 10 10 10 10 - 11 :00 - 12:00 100 2:00 - 4:00 . 10 10 10 10 10 75 12:00 - 6:00 4:00 - 6:00 10 10 10 10 10 - 6:00 - 9:00 25 6:00 - 7:00 - - - - - 100 7:00 - 9:00 25 40 45 25 Proposed Facility Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 8:00 - 10:00 10 25 40 10 10 - 8:00 - 9:30 120 10:00 - 12:00 55 40 10 55 10 30 9:30 - 11:00 320 12:00 - 2:00 10 35 10 35 10 25 11 :00 - 12:00 130. 2:00 - 4:00 10 10 10 10 10 100. 12:00 - 6:00 30 4:00 - 6:00 10 10 10 10 10 - 6:00 - 9:00 45 6:00 -7:00 - - - - - 100' 7:00 - 9:00 45 50 60. 45 50 75. Net Change in Use Mondav Tuesdav Wednesdav Thursday Fridav Saturday Sunday 8:00 - 10:00 - - - - - - 8:00 - 9:30 10:00 - 12:00 - - - - - - 9:30 - 11:00 12:00 - 2:00 - 25 - 25 - 25 11:00 - 12:00 30 2:00 - 4:00 - - - - - 25 12:00 - 6:00 30 4:00 - 6:00 - - - - - - 6:00 - 9:00 20 6:00 -7:00 7:00 - 9:00 20 10 15 20 50 75 Notes: Funerals can occur on any day, typically in the morning on Monday through Saturday. There are typically 1-2 funeral services held per week and 3 weddings per month. Peak usage is the reus!t of Worship services in the Sanctuary, which include a high perentage of families. This pattern increases the number of multi-passenger vehicles and reduces the need for parking spaces. . Prelimina(y Zoning Analysis/Church - Existing Condition Zoning District: Uses: Minimum Lot Area: Yard Requirements: Lot Coverage: Height Restrictions: RA, Single Family Residential Church - Permitted in Limited Circumstances School - Permitted in Limited Circumstances Daycore - Permitted Use Parking Lot - OK Minimum Lot Area = 6,000 sf Existing Lot Area = 51,591 sf = 1.18 acres '-'\,.-"-r'-'_"'-V~;",._...t""~""""'/''''.-1:i'''4_""",~,,, Front Yard = 30 ft - Ac!1l4l 19.32' (Pre Emling, Nrm.-Crm.Jarming) Interior Side Yard = 10 ft- Ac!1l4l 10.0l'(Pre Emling) Exterior Side Yard = 20 ft - AclUlll 19.88' (Pre Emling) Reor Yard = Equal to Height of Principal Building, Not < 25' . - Ac!1l4l 9.9" (Pre Emling, Non-ConJarming) (. A . M.~_ Total Impervious Surfaces not to Exceed 75% of Lot Area 51,588 x .75 = 38,691 sf Max. Existing Church Building Footprint = 10,780 sf Existing House Building Footprint & Shed = 2,853 sf Existing Parking Lot = 13,809 sf Existing Paved Areas = 2,032 sf Total Existing Impervious Surfaces = 29,474 sf = 57.1% Available Impervious Expansion = 9,217 sf Zlt^Qr~""""--' ~ rExisting Church Building Mean Height = 26'-0. \ Existing Church Building Top of Ridge = 41'-0. ; ."./. .~~ Church = 1 Space per 3 People in Sanctuary 1 Person Per 20. of Pew = 630 People = 211 Spaces Req'd Daycare = 1 Space per Employee = 4 1 Space for each 10 Licensed Copacity = 4 Total Parking Required = 219 Existing Parking Provided (On-Site) = 32 Existing Parking Required (Off-Site) = 58 Total Existing Parking Provided = 90 Parking Space Size = 9'x18' Off Street Loading: No Requirement Landscape Requirements: Per Article XXIII Off Street Parking: Prelimina(y Zoning Analysis/Church - Proposed Site Plan Zoning District: Uses: RA, Single Family Residential Church - Permitted in Limited Circumstances School - Permitted in Limited Circumstances Daycare - Permitted Use Parking Lot - OK Yard Requirements: Minimum Lot Area: Minimum Lot Area = 6,000 sf Proposed Lot Area = 59,446 sf 1 .36 acres Lot Coverage: Height Restrictions: Off Street Parking: Off Street Loading: landscape Requirements: Buildings: Front Yard = 30 ft Interior Side Yard = 10ft Exterior Side Yard = 20 ft* Rear Yard = Equal to Height of Principol Building, Not < 25' Parking: Not Less Than 10' Total Impervious Surfaces not to Exceed 75% of Lot Areo 59,446 x .75 = 44,584 sf Max. Existing Church Building Footprint = 10,780 sf Proposed Church Addition = 8,175 sf Proposed Parking Lot = 15,530 sf Proposed Paved Areas = 4,771 sf Total Existing & Proposed Impervious Surfaces 39,256sf Available Impervious Expansion = 5,328 sf 66.04% 28' or 2-Stories . ,-Existi~gChurchBuildingMilOn Height = 26'-0.' Proposed Church Addition Mean Height = 27'-0" Propose~ ~hu~ch Additi~n T.op .of .Rid.ge =36'-0:;- Church = 1 Space per 3 People in Sanctuary 1 Person Per 20. of Pew = 630 People = 211 Spaces Req'd Daycare = 1 Space per Employee = 4 1 Space for each 10 Licensed Capacity = 4 Proposed Church Addition = No Requirement/Accessory Use Total Parking Required = 219* Proposed Parking Provided (On-Site) = 51 Existing Parking Provided (Off-Site) = 58 Parking Space Size = 9'x18' Total EXisting/Proposed Parking Provided = 113* No Requirement Per Article XXIII GOSSIP ASMA ARCHITECTS 1601 Sherman Ave. EV81l5tol\ IIItnob 60201 Tel. 8-47.475.1250 Fax. 847.475.1290 A1.1 REVISION St. Paul Lutheran Church PROPOSED ADDITION & Al TCRA TJON FOR: ST. PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH 100 South School Street Mount Prospect, Illinois A R<;:t1!I.E<;:I Goss Pasma Architects . 1(.(11 Sl"nn~n^vt: l'v'f\5tOfJ.m;iloOiiftO~\lI 1l4741S.1:!3li TABLE OF CONTENTS AO: TITLE SHEET PLAT OF SURVEY A I.J: SITE AND FLOOR PLAN A3.1: ELEVATIONS A3.2: ELEVATIONS C I: SITE DEMOLITION PLAN C2: GEOMETRY AND PAVEMENT PLAN C3: STORMW A TER MANAGEMENT PLAN TS1: TREE SURVEY PLAN LS I : LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ ---- z a i= o ~I. Iii z a o II: l? f- a z GOSSIP ASMA ARCHI"l"E(."'TS . . Cl . .. , ~ . Ql ! 5 ii H , ...J ~ ," I 3~ !1 i .. 0 ;1 Q. .i I ul I-~o I EXISTING SITE PLAN !ICAI.l:I/31" ~ ,. ~ I I i ~ I :~,~~~:D LOWER LE~~~ EB CD &; Xi ~ z ii". ;~~~""'-"-.........." - -~~.~-;~~~~;.;~-.:Q~d[~:~/~~~_.~O~TI~~fl~J -- , ~ ~ _~~A"--_"_.-lI --~~'------------------..,.-.~.~~~-~~~ - ____~____ -_"0 ___._.____~ ~-~--..~ -.-.-.----....--~ I :~,;.~~~~ SITE PLAN EB 0- 0~ 0--. =~~~~~~ MAIN LEV~~~., EB 1'rIkirar.Z"'O"'~_,~ z..,.-............-._ u.t. ~~;:7:-== ~YI"" __.........__~ 1.~...........I'."'''.".._ Tn......... ~-:-~€:.~~?Ji~S::- .........,...-....- ut c-.p. ~~.."':"'ti: ~,....-:.: 100_ .M.. ,.._ tE ~;;-~liS..,:::~ r~".. E...~~.E;.-,,~:".' "" MIlfIolhWc'lictr :::::l:;t:::::::-..-=..~~~. 011 ~........ :.::: '~''fiE...:_.r:::-.... -.. ..... _ ~&:::..::'. .10,:;-- t_.,. . S.S::.~~i.: ~ -.._........- 1If......~...__ ~~~............. ft-. r..... ___ _ __ __ z..,..1IWIkt..._,__ u.;o: &i-~':';;:_=:= IIooiIuIILIIl~' =~~=:~"':.."... ,........ 1.4~, ~~~j~..~.-_,_.~ ld~ .~":.;.-:::.""'-"''''_''''''''_'',_''' ---...-.,....... --_........ ~=~..:...'.;,~,'"t,';. :::'-~~.:-:-.<>o_............ ~1oIWIin ~...g=:;..~.~d~:: ~~~ ;;~:~y7~::{'~_...... '-__("'_1_" ~"_-,,,,,,,,,,,.~ -_.....,...- '- '~_I'_--,,_. ".. 0l'I3NoI~...__ ~~.........- ~ ---.- taautofOlll -.._ '''''''lOGe z o t ::I II: t- I/) Z o o II: o LL. t- O Z GOSSIPASMA ARCHITECTS .1 lIIIM' . 16(!:!.1'ItnNnA,. E"N~~ ~T::r:E f l: I e . II ~ ';;.c II ::lUA I ...l" I" I :i i ~J . III 0 i. I ~ ". I/) '"I''''' .....0iIiii. ,",IPl.'" flOO!IIl'tNlt ,,.... ~--- r~1.1-~1 [Jw I II :.... ! Ii ! , o ~.~ "i~ o ~Ii !~ 76" .~. "f"~ ~!"~I t'''''.....~ !~,~Ct~~ rl' '-II J! [1 i. c1i -~ i :1 ~-r:-: j , I ~ Y . ~ w ~ m <II ... m ,... m ~ 6 z i L I 1 ul ~ :=1-:..: ~.I'~ ", :=~ ~oi "I_ ~IH ~.- 9i~;j ;; a ~i ~- St. Paul Lutheran Church ;A tllll$.S<:_I~ '""''''-','''- Z.;f ~~t . ,,~ ,t, ,t-, u "I~ "I'~ !r,:, ...., il e -, ~o I 1 [ , , , ,] --- ~ - - - - --- m )> <II ... m ,... m ~ o z .~. -0. "'f"'~ ~t't~. ---..l~~__ >0 :J ~o Ilv:> -v:> :::~ ;> ~~ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION F IU'~ I:' j3 r - --- , . !a .... I 1 i -~- ~- fi~ '" <( ~:!~ !I~ a " ~i I~ III ~IoIlOITlOfIIALTlMlJOfII_' ~8 II , St. Paul Lutheran ocr.> p ;:"A~ xcr.> Church -"0 N . ~nf ~E;; i 1.5,_11_ mf ~s::: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION l I .....~.II.- . ~;> I , iJ :0 m r ~ Z )> :0 -< i~ 'i~ Ii 'I 'I II I I :1 'i ,! , ----- i ~ x ~p ~ i j ,.. ~J""~l'l r. ,.,.. -,~, ~~. . .e' ,0 ,,".' -....:~-, ..u\,____._.___ " [lr---n----n---~ 11 t 1:1 ~,~ I ;~ [~~~~ i ~J + ' ":'.~:.."~1~ '~~~,:.::::,~ i ~10~~ ) --g----~06t>~----e}-- p. t h=fJ.--<.'....'~~;?;2~~~~T;:{;~~:i 0 "r: " ,,)1 "i 0" 'jl '< " IJ ~j~ ~~::~':-~j~j;:~:,~1y):~;fJ ~.b ",0' o :,t-,je'l 1""-',,',,' ',' :t, 01 1',-"':' I' l',I.....:l.:1 ~J ~"...."'> ~ ~~ ~r ~ ~'J, ~ ~ ~,,>/ ....i ;!: l:i~ 1 :;., ~~0~1 ;U r',>~'~~1.;~-.-."t---- 0 I II '~' 'I ~; f' "'~' .', ',< ,'(' ~' :1; ~.:l ~.: t~.:-"", <<~_.) I >,.:,<"<~:,,~/, ~ 1"-.' t ~-I .Ilf'-,"j:'t @ I,'. L\O<:....\!..'l..;_...w~, "...;/ \,"',,";'1 l;cn~J I! it" I'~~ I-I.....,~.,. '..., 1...-1-._-1 I I <-\_')l : r~~ '~~..-':,- ~~.-.~~:~~~/.:~:-:-:;,::...~r: ... )..:',' -( ... ~,~,:~:,~,~:-r~~t I "l1:11,~ ','/ '<,<< ^' '" ^", "" ,'v, ,[ H It,.s.""f~~ <.I ,(/~,/,<//" ....."/ '",/'~"/':',.'" ...,,/ '''/''''''''''// .;- It- l /;11 '.... .'... """" ,'< 1/ ..,.".. /"", "'.I <, / "" " '...,~ ~') l,~, '" (,. ,> ')... ..... ,," ,... '" 'j, ,A" }o ?o." 1 ' }"iJ"'~ < / '" .." /,..'(,'>/', -'''" ",".I "" " / <, / /, '" V ,.~. g';" .:)1 ~ 'v' ~~,.~> :;~/~, ~;v' ~~ ~>/)>;~C/"';'::~:;/-::;~")/~~(.;~",,-:;,(~"~~..~{(~~ ;~;l1':;j I-=~~-=- "t,) )N , " " '<' "'^ , '" "'^ '^' v ,I ;1:';1 ~.. .., ~,.>~~~ I /," ,~< v~,. ('//,/:)"><.> '~~";/~~''7' ~~v,,.v)'__/("~~("\~~/'), r~J7,~' ">l;'~"" >" ""'"'''>>',^,'-"i>''''' "".',11 '~'>( : t' ~~:,::y^>^, Y~;;:':'X<:y:,~.>->\.;':~-:~-<>~;' )<~'>y~:~.r1 ~ ' 1 ~ 1;.../v,,"'...~~,>':.;/v:;,v'/'<~":::'o(,>,,>.)V'): ,,';'v y<yv/''-~<~~'~'j ,I t, ""';'w/-'-T~~~""a~"'~""'-""""--""/_*""'.j.-""',... .. l ,It ~f'( il~rA '\.,: .I/~~) 'J: ~t " 1 rl?-~~ /'J,: ~(~~- ,~ \', . "" 1*--"" ,/ ,Y '" 0 f>' '^'" ,,-- j....>.4 ~l "'" "'....:;.,;:>vn..~, i' _' I. ,! '.' (') ~ --\ ."... ..../ ............ \01 I 1 r. "J ". II I , .; \ \(~ ;.:.~ _'/ '>-, '~1 I, > /:. , I. t1 i'l' '-'.:::--,,1/ -"~<~ii0 ~11:t'l:i.1 ~[ql... . ;~ "~ .n.~.-.:.-...- ~i: I ~.~! """+T: . h I' c! pi: '; ",~. ' (-,,,,.,,,,,, .~. II "'''' " ' .....1 p.r.." -. ~.,-- . Ii. : '., . ~ ~ r;. -i .H ~~.'''_.... --< .'1 ' " 1,.I,....li".I . ".::. ,~' ::: 1;'T=~' I ,,: ;.; ""'1' l"~' .c- ~ ' I. , ;....,(/~.:.....; 3 .... IQl;';'i ....~ 11 ililL_~,.~ "\J .", ,,;,L, ~~z"-,,:~'~' l!1 o C -i I l!1 " I o o , l!1 -i ;:0 fT1 fT1 3nN3A\1 3ssn8 '\ (. i ,. I Ii 81t'!;} ]J3~;)NOj --._.__,._._._.1,_...._.____,_._,_ '______'__ E] ~ADOmOIl"""TlIUoTlOlol'OlI. >0 J %0 .~~1I11=""~_ St. Paul Lutheran r.cn (") . :~ ~ Church :'~ =!~ ENGINEERING INC" .. ir.VJ LISLE. ILlINOIS II I.'~l"""" ;:; Ss: NOT FOR CONSTRUC~ 1II..........t~_ ~~ . :r.> ,2' ~~o " ~x Ir"n 0 o'R 6, o II Ii I: " I' ,~ ""U :0 m r ~ Z )> :0 -< EJI' I · n . I\) , ! I I I I l- i )1 I i -# l' Ii I I St. Paullutheran Church *S"'oo'~ ...Pt_.I~~ in ~.{-T---------------i----r'-I !..:I,'~ ~'~.II i-:I <..: ~ 22 I I ! il J:=--.,,,- , i ~1['I' .' -r---- . . . . 'i-il- I I ~ T' .111 ". g;',,: .t-! · . '0 .~ jJ I (f1il' 1~f.1';1< -!~------JI~-'i.~' ___u_._. --.~-~~~ i. ,: 1- ~I -- - -- I . I ,,0' { I ' , o .' .111,o,.il'~.. :.. '.1 '0.' -.-.-. .1: I I S .J.J! 1, I ~~ . ; . : ,. .'V__.,! I 11---- I ,.-j i II ,-,===,===- r-" I . 3' !' i: 1 I o~ i "I' I -----L .--1...,-1'---! I~! I I ~Ti' e~; I! c, IJ~; II . i"0 ::'--'1., II! f-I i - - .. II i' ~q' .~. I ' II - I . ----- 1 I I ell ~!.' t'~t'~ I~ ...0~ II H- - --- J.11 II ~ ---, L_ {. , ~I ' j I [II,s, i ~9' l', . ','> i J ".; I" ;........,-. 'r?\: rf~ I 1- ~ '. 'III '..,."X'I'-;>I.... ". "I i~'J ,',-,,:1 I o I I " ,. ,,'..~ . , .'.,' 'I I 19' ----J- I' . ;; '0 '", "-. .. .,; '-J;', . ..'-....'.......1..- . i I r r - -- - ~ II .' Ii .__ .... " r-~':;-'~ ,..----1 -+: I I (f1 ~d "I:, ';~C~'i i .L ~ .- -- j? 'i. i" c~ 0 , I I o o r l.~.'.. i rl ~ --.. 1 .1 : I i :1 !" I . , I I [0, I ! I I 8.11 II i I I ~I.P .' i Ll.___ ", f I, I I 8,.,. '. !. '. " I I ~;i: i :i ~ I il'. I I , ,PI ~~--- I] , I I i I I H " I I r"::, ---- . l'C.h I IJ ',l~ }~T~- 'n .. :~ :~ 'n :~ (f1 "" ;;;) r'l r'l -, ... \ 3n=r:N3^\;I i~ 3ssna ~_. - -"._~ II r-- II I ~ ~~~: 0 ~Hf ~~~i . >0 ;:0 Q~ i,_.,~)j~J!~~~7~~~'!:-2::i j~ ENGINEERING INC. iiga liSLE, ILLINOIS ~> NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 'IS' ,. I~ i ~ Iii !, ""0 :0 m r s: Z )> :::JJ -< EJ ! I~ I ~ : o i 1 Co) . I , I' i ! ~ , " ~i lJ,~ ! ~~ ~~ in~ ~~ ~~ ::i!l ~~ ~ ~. , I i " ~,=~~~=.J ---~~ I St. Paul Lutheran Church 'ClCSk!o",~ ....___.IL_ !. ~1:--------------: . I ;; :-'" I I ! '~ I' I'! f----~--Ll II i tili)) ~~ ~U ~. ---f-- /"5. -~--- i I. - - im TITI-1tl , ; I il !_ I H-- !;. : t I I lU rn-- H1 ., r11-;-- fli I I H- I; ,-- II [:( :,' --~ 1-1 - - ! ~ Ii f- i I i I'r- Ii '1':1':; '1' 1-1 - - ,.1 r--. l,rJ'.I, II J!o"11 I I ~:'ll;:i '..1 U_ ~ii' i ~ . I I ii.l 1111--:---' '.. <l:i:.i I,.'; '.' I I I.J.lt:......... j I I') _ .t.1il." : I ; "!I '. I 't-'! 1 1'- IL.j\ i I:: g " I ' in! ~'"i I i I): [l. '. ..,~: : ~~=-~; ~g~~~-~-- 8.t11l.:l:J1JlijM:n -- J j 1 I ! 'I' · ~ "J~ J~ 1- l~ ( ----.. '::1 I~ I .. _ ~tf"'::)I~~'O:. , :'~'f ~ ~Ef~ ~,~J i. H~~ . >0 .0 nv.> -v.> ~:;:, => j~ :r.> NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r.:~"~!g,SJ\iiil:~~;-1;!" i --------.-'-- ENGINEERING INC. L1S:..E. !lLlNOI$ ;.I~: ~ ~~[(~ \J U ii ! I 01'1 . , ,- \ I \..-.." School Street ---, ;, ~~"'" ~)all/~ .[~lIIlhC/1pil~tJ ri-~' paUI~:heranChurJ~ / j~ L" .'\lIr~l'n', Illc. lOOS, School Street '.,~-' . . . . .. UniJ:ntr:I_Srhmiu I Tlr.ii:"-Cfm>lruchon.Malnl,,mIOU Nlluuy LMt. Prospecl, IllinOis .!oulr: I.Oc<= 10.0' I ...,..."", 67$4 W('~llndia~ C,,:eek Road J U.'f: 04.12.04 "''''-,..., Lcn~ (,Jon" IUme)lS 60067 _ _ _..:==-::=:.- Rr,j,;oM: 05.12.IM, --.,..."..... I...~''"',*,.,...,... 06.01.04.0l.1S.0S L....-.--__.__.~_~____ ~----------- Legend C~ -t Sh><k'r...(Dl ' /) 1t.~S.....'M>pl.llSl J ~L,~"<Il..,,w"..)'(ll O~ hr:::~~::~~.:~::f R"." Il,,,~ ~.llll~' O S,","O'n'm<nullrc<'C61 . A""""dM~IL.SI."'"",at,.t,.ppl<.t>,'t"l -. '~:~E:;i~;:~;.;;~i~.,",.,<.,,,,, "& ~l"'u'''iS~llIh,{ll'l (.",,,< rJe~"'" S~OW R_) v..' (1)1 1,,,li<<II..I""t,,'.IV;"{)1, riM RIIool.,.;.,r>d,,~, I"' (l~) l<'dl""'llo>r...'<l~.6'~HI V ^".~'<~(i"..f>6wo<').lt74~1 0""""'''''''''''-' c-----~-~~--~~---J- iPOU1',' l andSC. aping, Inc,' h,erebY reseNf"Sits (omm, on law COP,Yfi9hts land other property rights In these plans. These plans are confidential and not to be reproduced. changed, or (OPted In any form, nor arc they to be dIsclosed to or used by any thlfd party without first lobtatnmQ wrItten J!':rmlSSlon and consent of ~~'s landscaPl~Lnc .... " m m Ul c: " < m -< ... r- :0- Z in nr-~w_n___u_-----------_._---j ij i. '--11 .. { . ,g" H.." .." ~;. Ig" r 11' ,', r, ~:: ~ I' OJ ~..... f 'r(; ~ I ... ;t li; '1' . ~ .,~ i~ ~~ ;~~ I'~~ i~~III' Iii' '. ~~ l~:~ ,l~: Iii 'i ,~~ j'!' i~' ~ ii _~. jm~ i ,-,/,/ ~~ i I' l-1~n_--1~'._.._'._n_.._.__..@:":._-~ I - "- . -- - ~ !~tfj:1 H'I n : i II '" '~il: B; I 0 I =. '11 II ~''':l:;' ;08'0 I r- ,. = -~ I' I ~ _., I f~ ~h ,: I .: ' , :~ "1:"'"----"'-"""- - [If ;~'!~ Ii :l~ Fl.j ~ 'I 1\1 '-~//.0i 1:-,",- - -- !~ I: II~_ ~' ~ ,-I""~ i I nJ1 \90 Ii I O' ,) ~ ls',,!?-- lc niO I' '". 1'1 .~ . -,,, ~: I"j H,! I l~ ! " l ;;:L'~.~~' ."- l~ 1 I I 11 0~' i I' uLlJ , g ~ I~i n P I' ,.....J tr.:.-_---.l.e-------"j tE..::. (! 5 " .' .11;-, I ,I ~:I II"'~ - I 'I c~1 't. ;'" ~[D,: I~I 11 m K-.i II -I 't '~~., li'~ I! ,i!l~~:7~~ ::-:. :'.--J:i ~~ j 'I: ",' .' IV. I i' 12 , ij; , ::- Wi Iii ' ~ i II; I Isl.1 1\..-1' '.' I, ,- .. .<, " 1,\1 ,,' ; <~bl' ili :li-~d'I.>I! ~'/ '? 'oi" j f;L-.-l' iit---.. ~.-r:0~_li FT'r.r.=,- ~~ i H 'II ,I " ~ II g~~~! J. ' '~-, 11Fr1 ill 11'[ ~i.", ~ i0f~!~f'IH,J" I, I i \ I ." I' l .: :g "" ~ i I I, I I e.' Ii' I:' :~ " ~I! I; ~ J . ~ ,I IC-- ~il; ii' I : U E . </ 11' r'~""~'- ~i I :' ,'~ 'oJ' '0: t I J ~ I,! ' , ~d I I I,'il' ~' I.:.. .. !~ I '~I' ill Ii I' i" ~ <4 i l.flliY ! I 'f~ ;:::: 110i I I i It-;-,",,,,,,,- ---~~-Ul'".~1 ~1 0 ! !II Ih::L".=cu-. .~ i, I J ' "'~ ;c' "''0, -' f' ,-, llu _,/ _~~I : QJ;~_~~~~~ "",~_1~0~ .I~~L~ _~__"~ ~~ '. ~ ~ ~~ H ..~ .=:.:>'::i ::::j 0- .< . :_-:/\\';~ i =~~'\ -------- :1 :1 ~. I I ! I ad"" 1LJ~JNOJ . - --- _.- ..._- ;--_____._._____.L._______._.__.___________ " _i~O 11'0 0 ~.E '~ o [U 5 : I~ ~OQOn'1lOll.Al.nMl'CJ'I~ )0 Wf J I ~ ~o oen ~i en ! !I St, Paul Lutheran -en =::0 i I Church ;d~ ~> ':~fZ ...a. . ~~H S~ II i 'OO'.!.c__ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ""._"",,,,'~- . ~> II ~JIlI!ON ~--- Ordering Guide rCheck('ppropr;(1[t!.fI:'Ii!cf/onsJ Lens Options o (AC) Acrylic Clear o (AW) Acrylic.: White. o (PC) Palycarbonate Clear o Other . RI!CiI/!lIIl/:"ltied w"Ii./!iw'"t'i"Cell( lilmps Light Source Ootions o AL09024 o 50MH D o 70MH D o IOOMH D o l.\OMH D o 175MH D o IOOHPS D o lSOHPS D o J2W/CFH GX24q-J o 42W/CFH GX24q-4 olNC D o Other D "'" !'l"h'((/Um brJU lamp Volt'ige Options 0120 0208 0240 o 277 0 '480 0 120/277 o *QUAD wired at o Othcr_ .S'nme wattage! voiwge l.:ombinaliulI.\" may nol be available. plea.HI. c.'OI;.~llllj(lC'ory. Notes: Optical Options o (RFS) Type V Borosilicate Gluss Refractor o (RFJ) Type III Borosilicate Glass Refractor o (1IS5) Houseside Shield 090' 01 RO' o (LVRl) Type V Stack Reflector o Other Electrical Options o (FS 1) Fused (Single. ill pole, 120 or 277 voltage) o (FS2) Fused (Double. In pole, all othe, ,o/loge) o (QD) Quick DiscOIUlect o (PEe) Photoelectric Control (Sp~djji vulldge) Finish Options Srm.dard seh'ctions are lightly le:ttl/I'cd salinfilli~'I1f:J Set' data Sl!clion 1&" finishing .\pedfimtiam;.. o (WIlT) White o (BKT) Black Tcxturcd o (BRZ) Bronze o (VER) Verolla o (GRE) Green o (GRA) Gray o Other Premium o Custom.Color (Colur chip rl!quired) Part No Exampl, AL09024/ AC /100MH120-D / HSS90 I FS1/ BKT / I!FapPt'abl') LllfIli,-;;;;;;J LI!I-;;J SOIIH'e.Jr1:iJ \..Sod;;;t'Optic(AE/~(~Fini,~h S/y!e / / / / / / SpecitierName: Specifier Signarure: (1'1C<i'~ P,.",,) Date: Laser Luminaire Boardwalk Collection [l3 LJ OJ II ",,=, ~ BEACON PRODUCTS INC . 6503 19TH STREC'T EAST. SARASOTA, FL 34243 . PH 941-755-6694 . FAX 941-751-5535 BWw28 SPECIFl(,....T10NS Sl:BJf.cTTO Cli...t\'GE WITHOUT :-.rOTleE 1'<1:1 ....!>:Ol. 0.01 f" 1,.02 I t" 0." b.O: 0.03 I t" O.1>t 0,01 b.ot 0.04 0.06 I. I t,O,) 0.04 b.03 0.04 0;1 I i" 0.04 0.01' I b." I 0.04 ,0.05_ __006 ~.~___ _'?.~ _. .O.l~.. ..~:.IO..,. .O.l~___ .~:~._..~~~4._ _..l?'~.~_.._ 0.1' D.l:; IHla 0.01 0.06 c:::::f==-n---------c= ." :r.rrrm:r.:r.rl:J-;'~-=- .______F ] 0." 0." 0." 0." 0." 0." 0." 0.<7 0." 03' ~ ~., =" - y, .. - - ,".. - -.:::~ ~ 0.&7 0.60 0.70 0,73 0.11 0 D." 0.61 o.~ O~7 O. I o.ao 0.10 0.71 0.11 073 o.~ 10.'1 0.7& 0.89 I-J-- , illLu_~1rrL o.n 0.71 0.7& 0." 0.12 -9.,9.!L.....s.~~A 10.4 :: ~~jj 10' 0.67 0.&& ENTIRE AREA AVERAGE Ie = .62 MAXIMUM Ie = 1.02 MINIMUM Ie - .2 AVERAGE/MINIMUM - 3.' MAXIMUM/MINIMUM - 5.1 TOTAl NUMBER OF POINTS = 179 AVERAGE Ie = ,43 MAXIMUM fe;. ",. 1.02 MINIMUM fe ~ .01 AVERAGE/MINIMUM - 43 MAXIMUM/MINIMUM = 102 TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS = 296 POINT BY POINT FOOTCANDLE LEVELS PRQJECT NAWE: ST.PAULS LUTHERAN CHURCH OTY. LABEL lUMINAlRE DESCRIPTlON / MOUNllNG HEIGHT LUMENS J I A 1, / lASER' A1.-09024-LVRI-17S-MH / IS' POlES I 14000 1 I B 1, / lASER' A1.-09024-LVRI-17SMH-'8OHSS/1S'POLE I 14000 IPREPARED BY: 1"'_ 1:-18-2005 ~ Ar~ON PRQOUCTS c.\.Id\.n.:z<\_ _7A.ADI I /I II ~i, iYl I N J - ~ 70' c ;0' 40 ~~ CR,.PI1ICSC4l( f--- ~ ; , ~ ' 1 " rOR, ST. PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH ORDER NO.: 2002-1081 FlLE: 16-4'-1' PRO,/(C1"0 EDWARD J. MOLLOY & ASSOCIATES, LTD. LAND & CONSTRUCTION SURVEYORS lliEtlJ), !2)() MI\F!I< S1l1(0. ~Jrr-l~;(tMUf.. IllII'lO:S 60105 :r,:.~) 5'$5-2601') r". (&JO) .'i')~-4?C() PLAT OF SURVEY ~"..' \.Oj~' ~ ~-~" ..&'-- . 0'- i i ! j I I L________ LOT 2 lOT 3i' i.or .3f lGT 35 I,CT 34 J, ">q,. .Q' , ;"r.;:;\. a' <!:- .' 1- ,y il I --\.::.;:~;;;:-~'..~;~j AREA or TRACT SURVfYED: 48.973 SQ. rr. OR 1.124 ACRES (~) ~~Tt or ,U"OIS) 0lIJ"'" 01 Dll"~ef r.;s t, E:%MNlO oJ. WQU.Q1, N< ..U'tClO!; ~~ l)Io~ $\lllVt'fl)lll. >r[ll("" ClW'P'''' ....... A ~<J~ .....~ snlt.....,C IINr.(. .... ~'I(e'llOoo or n<f ~P[""" \lI:....\.~ :'(S'.'ll[tl """H." "'0 nt.\' '.... ......' "~R1:OM 001..... 1$ A <<l'lOt~t ;t..~S~~m' or .....0 Sli""O' OIO/tJ0:5~ -'I( S><0'M0 ill rLrr ..,..0 ot:CIolOi. &Ot';[I",'ar., nlMClS. tlOlTro '''IS ...J.}.'t.. OAY or ___~_. At' 'V\l} F ,.4/,,,, .n.,d1.Hftr'.J -"""?;'~&~"'~--<=- -I, Kad 05/06/05 je 5/9/05 be 5/10/05 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATION$ANQe.NEXg~PTION FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CQ[)~FQ'1 P'39pgRTX GENERALLY LOCATED AT 100 SOUTH 'SCHOOL STREET WHEREAS, St. Paul Lutheran Church (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner) is the owner of the property generally located at 100 South School Street (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) and legally described as follows: Lot A (Except the South 255 feel.. th~r~Qf) in Block' 8 in Busse and Wille's Resubdivision in Mount Propsect in the West ~ of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County Illinois. The North 50 feet of the South 255 feet of Lot A together with the East ~ of the vacated alley lying West and adjoining said North 50 feet of the South 255 feet of Lot A in Block 8 in Busse and Wille's Resubdivison in Mount Prospect, in the West ~ of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois. and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation from Section 14JQ95..Bt()the.r~quired exterior side yard setback from 20 feet to 19.32 feet to allow for the building addition and from 20 feet to 10 feet to allow for the proposed parking lot. ' WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation from Section 14..1 005.B to the required rear setback from 27 feet to 25.2 feet to allow for the proposed parking lot. WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation from Section 14.2224 for the amount of required on-site parking spaces from 219 to the proposed total of 52 spaces. WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested an exception to the requirements of the Development Code, Section 16.603, to provide storm water detention for the new impervious surface only; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the requests for setback and parking variations from Sect.ion J 4.1095. ..B and Sec. 14.2224 and an exception from Section 16.603 of Chapter 16 (Development Co'de)'forthe Subject Property at their regular meeting on April 28, 2005, said request being the subject of PZ 10-05 and by a unanimous vote recommended to the President and Board of :B Trustees of the Village to grant the variations from Chapter 14 and an exception from Chapter 16 as requested; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has forwarded their recommendation being the subject of PZ 10-05 to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do,hereby granUo the Subject Property Variations from Sec. 14.1005.8 and Sec. 14.2224 (Zoning Ordinance) and an exception from Section 16.603 of Chapter 16 (Development Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect for storm water detention for a specific portion of the Subject Property, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A," subjectto complying with the following: 1. Consolidating the Subject Property into a single lot of record; 2. Revising the lighting plan to comply with the Village's lighting regulations; 3. Revising the landscape plan to reflect existing fences and the proposed fence along the south lot line; 4. Meeting the Building Code & Fire Code requirements for Fire Protection that include the installation of sprinkler and fire alarm; 5. Complying with all other Development Requirements, as defined in Section 15.402 of the Village Code, which include: I. The installation of streetlights within the public right of way adjacent to the site; and ii. Paying a fee for the planting of parkway trees in the public right of way along the site (this fee is $400 per tree, and shall be based upon the number of planting sites determined by the Village's Forestry Division). SECTION THREE: Except for the modifications granted herein, all other requirements of said Development Code shall apply to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2005. Irvana K. Wilks Village President . ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H:\CLKOIfiles\WIN\ORDINANCIDEV Code and VAR 100 s school sl paul May 2005.doc Jun-Dl-05 05:D~pm From-Schain 6urney Ross alZ aaz uaza SCHAIN, BURNEY, Ross & elmON, LTD. PATRICK T. BRANKIN Direcr Dial (312) 422-7642 E-Mail: pbmnkin@&Chalnlaw.com June 1, 2005 Via Facsimile Transmission (847) 392-6022. Mr. Michael Janonis Village Manager Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Monnt Prospect, IL 60056-3266 Re: St. John Mitroff Group Development Dear Mr. Janonis. I-~bl ~ UUZ/UUZ r-b~~ LAW OFFICES SUite 1910 222 North LaSalle Street Ch ic:ago, Illinois 60601-11 DZ 312.332-0200 Fax .312.332-4514 ~1~ Coniirming our conversation of this afternoon, the Mitroff Group hereby respectfully requests that the second reading of the ordinances regarding !:he above-referenced development be continued until the July 19, 2005 council meeting. Mitroffrequests this continuance in order to be able to prepare responses fa the various concerns raised by board members at the first reading. Thank you for your consideration of this request. PTBj sd C:\I-IOME\P'TB\ LETI'ERS\ Letters-5-05\Janonis-llr-5-24-05.doc