The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5. OLD BUSINESS 4/6/05 MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~b . ~< loll S rw- FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SUBJECT: FEBRUARY 11,2005 PZ-46-04: VARIATION (OVERSIZED DETACHED GARAGE) 1310 BURNING BUSH LANE TED DRAG - APPLICANT The Petitioner is appealing the Planning & Zoning Commission's decision to deny a request for an ,oversized detached garage (Case No. PZ-46-04) for the residence at 1310 Burning Bush Lane (the "Subject Property"). The Planning & Zoning Commission heard the request at their January 27, 2005 meeting. The attached exhibits indicate that the location of the proposed garage would comply with the required setbacks. However, the size and height of the garage exceed the maximum size permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The Petitioner proposes to construct a 750 sq. ft. garage, which exceeds the maximum 672 sq. ft. permitted. In addition, the height of the proposed garage is 13.25', which exceeds the 12' (measured from the mid-point) permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning & Zoning Commission discussed the Petitioner's request in great detail. Several Commissioners stated their preference to have the Petitioner store the Bass boat and yard furniture inside the proposed garage as a way to minimize storage in the yard and on the driveway. However, they also stated that the Variation request was not based on a hardship and that the Petitioner has alternatives to building a 750 sq. ft. garage to meet his storage requirements. . There was further discussion regarding other garages that were granted Variations and exceeded the 672 sq. ft. limitation. The Commissioners noted that only one garage received a Variation since the Zoning Ordinance was recently amended to allow 672 sq. ft. garages. That Variation was granted to allow an addition to an existing garage to accommodate a workshop room, but the approval was conditioned on: 1) a shed could not be constructed on the subject property; 2) the existing rear garage wall had to remain, but modified to allow a door no larger than 3 '6" to provide access between the addition and the garage; and 3) the exterior access door to/from the addition could not exceed six-feet in width. The Planning & Zoning Commission voted 3-4 to deny the Variation to allow a 750 sq. ft. garage that would measure 13.25' from the mid-point of the roof, Case No. PZ-46-04, at 1310 Burning Bush Lane. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their February 15,2005 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. ~i: William. Cooney, Jr., AICP Ijc RIPLAN\Plannmg & Zonfig COMMIP&z 2005IMEJ MemoslPZ-46-<J4 MEJ MEMO (1310 Burning Bush Lane - V AR- ov",slzed g"age).doc MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ-46-04 Hearing Date: January 27, 2005 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1310 Burning Bush Lane PETITIONER: Ted Drag PUBLICATION DATE: January 12, 2005 Journal & Topics PIN#: 03-25-123-003-0000 REQUEST: Variations for the size and height of a detached garage. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Arlene Juracek Merrill Cotten Joseph Donnelly Leo Floros Ronald Roberts Richard Rogers Matthew Sledz Keith Youngquist MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Connolly, AICP, Senior Planner Ellen Divita, Deputy Director, Community Development INTERESTED PARTIES: Ted Drag Chairperson Arlene Juracek called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Richard Rogers moved to approve the revised minutes of the October 28, 2004 meeting; and Joe Donnelly seconded the motion. The motion was approved 4-0, with abstentions by Leo Floros, Matt Sledz and Keith Younquist. Matt Sledz moved to approve the minutes of the November II, 2004 meeting and Merrill Cotten seconded the motion. The minutes were approved 5-0, with abstentions by Leo Floros and Keith Younquist. Ms. Juracek introduced Case No. PZ-46-04, a Variation request for the size and height of a detached garage. She said that this case is Planning & Zoning Commission Final. Judy Connolly, Senior Planner, summarized the Staff Report. She said that the Subject Property is located on the west side of Burning Bush Lane, between Cree Lane and Euclid Avenue, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned R1 Single Family Residence and is bordered by the R1 District on the north, west, and south and by the CR Conservation Recreation District to the east, River Trails Park District. The Subject Property is slightly larger than the typical RI lot and has a rectangular shape. The Petitioner would like to demolish the existing garage, repave the driveway, and construct an oversized detached garage. The proposed garage would comply with the zoning setbacks; however, the proposed driveway would need to be modified to comply with the code. The Zoning Ordinance limits the size of the driveway width to no more than 23' after 15' from the front elevation of the garage. In order to comply with the zoning regulations, the Petitioner would need to change the color or the material of the adjacent patio so the driveway does not exceed the 23' width limitation. Ms. Connolly reviewed the Petitioner's exhibits, which illustrated that the proposed garage would measure 30'x25', which is 750 sq. ft., and would measure 13.25' from the mid-point of the roof. She said that the Zoning Ordinance allows detached garages up to 672 sq. ft. and the height cannot exceed 12' when measured Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-46-04 Page 2 from the mid-point of the roof. Therefore, the Petitioner is seeking Variations for the height and size of the proposed oversized garage. Ms. Connolly said that the proposed garage would be constructed of white vinyl siding and have a 6:12 pitch roof. Vehicles would enter/exit the garage on the east elevation through either a 16' wide double door or a single, 10' wide single door. In addition, there would be a service door and two windows on the north elevation. The Petitioner states in his application that the oversized garage is necessary to accommodate storage needs, which include a boat. Several of the Petitioner's neighbors signed a petition stating they are not opposed to the proposed garage. The existing home does not comply with current Village zoning regulations because the house encroaches into the required front yard by one inch. Also, the existing detached garage encroaches into the required side yard setback. However, the Petitioner would demolish this garage and construct a garage that meets the required setbacks. The standards for a Variation are listed in the Zoning Ordinance and include specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. Ms. Connolly summarized the standards and said that the Petitioner is proposing to construct an oversized garage to provide additional storage. The Petitioner states that he only has a subbasement, which does not meet his storage requirements. Also, he states that the oversized garage would allow him to store his 'yard' furniture and boat inside the garage, as opposed to parking the boat on the driveway, which is permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Connolly said that the Petitioner provided a list of oversized garages with his application. She said that five of the garages are in the Village's corporate limits. Staff researched the information provided by the Petitioner, but could not confirm the size of all the garages listed. She said that the table in the Staff Report documents that only one oversized garage received a Variation since the Zoning Ordinance was changed to allow larger detached garages (672 square feet). Based on the information submitted by the Petitioner, the Variation is needed to accommodate the Petitioner's living requirements, which does not meet the Zoning Ordinance's definition of a hardship. Ms. Connolly said that the Petitioner has the option of adding onto the house and/or constructing a shed to store some items. However, any of these alternatives would require modifying the driveway and patio to ensure the site continued to meet lot coverage requirements. Although the requested Variations are unlikely to have a detrimental effect on neighborhood character, the request fails to support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the Variations to permit a 750 square foot garage that would measure 13.25' from the mid-point of the roof, for the residence at 1310 Burning Bush Lane, Case No. PZ-46-04. The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision is final for this case. Ms. Juracek asked Ms. Connolly to review the e-mail from a neighbor inquiring whether adverse water run-off conditions would be created as a result of this Variation. Ms. Connolly said that she had contacted the Engineering Department to answer the resident's question. Engineering found that the Petitioner's request would not exceed the Village's lot coverage limitations. Therefore, constructing a new garage should not adversely impact drainage. Matt Sledz asked about the Variation that had been granted since the Text Amendment that allowed larger garages had been adopted. Ms. Connolly said that the Petitioner could have done a lOx 12 shed, but wanted a larger garage instead of the shed. The P&Z approved the larger garage on the condition that a shed would never be built. That case was final with the P&Z. Ted Drag, 1310 Burning Bush Lane, was sworn in. He said that he has lived in his Mount Prospect home for three years. He said Ms. Connolly had covered all points of his petition very well. He said he designed the garage so his Bass boat would fit perfectly during storage time. He has hired a professional architect and builder Planning & Zoning Commission Arlene Juracek, Chairperson PZ-46-04 Page 3 and will change the color of the driveway concrete to meet zoning regulations. He described several other large size garages in the area. He said he investigated the water drainage issue, which is a problem in their area, and said he is sure he will not add to it with this garage. He also said he will not need a shed in the future if he is allowed to build this garage to these proportions. The Planning & Zoning Commission asked Mr. Drag about his current storage situation. Mr. Drag said he presently keeps vehicles and his boat on the driveway. Ms. Juracek asked if any audience members wished to speak. Since nobody came forward, she closed the Public Hearing. She said a petition from the neighborhood was submitted and that it is in favor of the request. Mr. Cotten said the residents want to get vehicles and boats off the driveways. Mr. Donnelly agreed as did Mr. Floros, although he said he has mixed feelings because the Text Amendment has just been written and exceptions were already being made. Mr. Rogers said he agreed with Mr. Floros; he said he felt a line had to be drawn somewhere. Mr. Sledz also had similar comments. He thought the premise of not building a shed on the property was appealing, but a new owner might not abide by that rule. Ronald Roberts said he thought a deeper garage could store the boat without being that much larger. Richard Rogers made a motion to approve a Variation for a 750 sq. ft. detached garage that measured 13.25' from the mid-point of the roof for the residence at 1310 Burning Bush Lane, Case No. PZ-46-04. Merrill Cotten seconded the motion. UPON ROLL CALL: A YES: Cotten, Donnelly, and Juracek NAYS: Floros, Rogers, Youngquist, and Sledz Motion was denied 4-3. Ms. Juracek explained to Mr. Drag that he had the option to appeal the P&Z's decision to the Village Board within five calendar days and that Ms. Connolly would follow up to explain that procedure to him. After hearing four more cases, Richard Rogers made a motion to adjourn at 11 :45 p.m., seconded by Joe Donnelly. The motion was approved by a voice vote and the meeting was adjourned. H:IPLAN\Planning & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2005\;\1inutesIPZ-46-04 1310 Burning Bush -, Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY - PZ- 46-04 LOCATION: PETITIONER: OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 1310 Burning Bush Lane Ted D. Drag Ted D. Drag 03-25-123-003-0000 0.21 acres (9,100 square feet) R1 Single Family Residence Single Family Residential Variation (Oversized Garage) LOCATION MAP Indian GraY< Elementary School RIver Trails School DIstrict No. 26 \340 \304 1302 1300 Euclid Avenue ~ '" ... '" - ----N '" '" '" '" '" ----- Church 1321 IJIJ Burning Bush Trails Park River Trail, Park District = '" ~ MEMORANDUM Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ARLENE JURACEK, CHAIRPERSON FROM: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 20,2005 HEARING DATE: JANUARY 27,2005 SUBJECT: PZ-46-04 - VARIATION (OVERSIZED GARAGE) 1310 BURNING BUSH LANE (DRAG RESIDENCE) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the January 27,2005 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Ted D. Drag (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 1310 Burning Bush Lane (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow a 750 sq. ft. detached garage that measures 13.25' from the midpoint when the Zoning Ordinance permits detached garages up to 672 sq. ft. and no more than 12' in height when measured from the mid-point of the roof. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the January 12,2005 edition of the Journal Topics Newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250-feet and posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the west side of Burning Bush Lane, between Cree Lane and Euclid Avenue, and contains a single-family residence with related improvements. The Subject Property is zoned Rl Single Family Residence and is bordered by the Rl District on the north, west, and south and by the CR Conservation Recreation District to the east (River Trails Park District). The Subject Property is slightly larger than the typical Rl lot and has a rectangular shape. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner would like to demolish the existing garage, repave the driveway, and construct an oversized detached garage. Originally, the Petitioner's proposal exceeded the maximum amount of permitted lot coverage, but the project was revised to comply with the 45% lot coverage limitation. The attached exhibits have been revised to reflect a 45% lot coverage. The proposed garage would comply with the zoning setbacks; however, the proposed driveway would need to be modified to comply with the code. The Zoning Ordinance limits the size of the driveway width to no more than 23' after 15' from the front elevation of the garage. In order to comply with the zoning regulations, the Petitioner would need to change the color or the material of the adjacent patio so the driveway does not exceed the 23' width limitation. The Petitioner's exhibits indicate that the proposed garage would measure 30'x25', which is 750 sq. ft., and would measure 13.25' from the mid-pint of the roof. The Zoning Ordinance allows detached garages up to 672 sq. ft. and the height cannot exceed 12' when measured from the mid-point of the roof. Therefore, the Petitioner is seeking Variations for the height and size of the proposed oversized garage. PZ-45-04 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting November II, 2004 Page 3 The Petitioner's exhibits illustrate that the garage would be constructed of white vinyl siding and have a 6: 12 pitch roof. Vehicles would enter/exit the garage on the east elevation through either a 16' wide double door or a single, 10' wide single door. In addition, there would be a service door and two windows on the north elevation. The Petitioner states in his application that the oversized garage is necessary to accommodate storage needs, which include a boat. Several of the Petitioner's neighbors signed a petitioner stating they are not opposed to the proposed garage. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The existing home does not comply with current Village zoning regulations because the house encroaches into the required front yard by one (1) inch. Also, the existing detached garage encroaches into the required side yard setback. However, the Petitioner would demolish this garage and construct a garage that meets the required setbacks. The following table compares the Petitioner's proposal to the R1 Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. Rl Single Family District Existing Proposed Minimum Requirements SETBACKS: Front 30' 29.9' No Change 5' 8.19' (north) No Change Interior 9' (south) No Change Rear 25' 82.12' (house) No Change 30' Existing Garage 17.5' New Garage LOT COVERAGE 45% Maximum 38% 45% VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: . A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and . . Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner is proposing to construct an oversized garage to provide additional storage. The Petitioner states in the attached application that he only has a subbasement, which does not meet his storage requirements. Also, he states that the oversized garage would allow him to store his 'yard' furniture and boat inside the garage, as opposed to parking the boat on the driveway. As part of the application, the Petitioner provided a list of oversized garages, 5 of which are in the Village's corporate limits. Staff could not confirm the size of all the garages listed, but the following table includes other oversized garages that received Variation approval. PZ-45-04 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting November II, 2004 Page 4 .,¡ Address Size of Detached Gara~e (Approved) 604 Wilshire 720 sq. ft. 1918 Wood Lane 682 sq. ft. 702 Windsor 750+ sq. ft* 1402 Robert Drive 896 sq. ft. 517 Eastman Drive 3-4 car double deep* 1002 Prospect Manor 748 sq. ft. 716 Prospect Manor 768 sq. ft. 1712 Martha Lane 672 sq. ft. (600 was max at that time) 915 S. Owen 768 sq. ft** 1310 Burninf!: Bush Lane 750 sq. {t. *= Staff does not have a record of a Variation ** = Only Variation approved after the Zoning Ordinance was changed to permit 672 sq. ft. garages. Based on the information submitted by the Petitioner, the Variation is needed to accommodate the Petitioner's living requirements, which does not meet the Zoning Ordinance's definition of a hardship ("A practical difficulty in meeting the requirements of this chapter because of unusual surroundings or condition of the property involved, or by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness or shape of a zoning lot, or because of unique topography, underground conditions or other unusual circumstances"). The Petitioner has the option of adding onto the house and/or constructing a shed to store some items. However, any of these alternatives would require modifying the driveway and patio to ensure the site continued to meet lot coverage requirements. RECOMMENDATION Although the requested variations are unlikely to have a detrimental effect on neighborhood character, the request fails to support a finding of hardship, as required by the Variation standards in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Zoning Ordinance. Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission deny the Variations to permit a 750 square foot garage that would measure 13.25' from the mid-point of the roof, for the residence at 1310 Burning Bush Lane, Case No. PZ-46-04. The Planning & Zoning Commission's decision is final for this case. I concur: Ji~.loJ~~~{r:ctor of Community Dovel opment Ijc KIPLANIPI,nning & Zoning cOMM\P&Z 2005\S"ffMcma\PZ-46-04 MEMO (1310 enming Bnsh L'Jlc - VAR- g",sgc).doc . VILLAGE OF MuUNT PROSPECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone 847.818.5328 FAX 847.818.5329 Variation Request P&Z Final The Planning & Zoning Commission has final administrative authority for all petitions for fence variations and variation requests that do not exceed twenty-five (25%) of a requirement stipulated by the Village's Zoning Ordinance. PETITION FOR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW . Common Address(es) (Street Number, Street) I-. 1<10 I< / / £¡V..:z=,{)G BU!;¡.j L;u. Tax LD. Number or County Assigned Pin Number(s) 03 - ~.:3>- - I 02--.5 - 00_=5 - ót?OQ z 0 ÞOOO; ~ -( Legal Description (attach additional sheets if necessary) ~ 0 þ;¡;., Z ÞOOO; ~ ~ ÞOOO; trJ z 0 ~ ~~ . 0 ~ þ;¡;., t,, . Z s. Xe, ~ . Q Z ÞOOO;. h ,... " z 0 ÞOOO; ~ -( ~I 0..... þ;¡;., s:: Z 13 ÞOOO; ..... QP.. Z P. p< 01 ~ ~ ~ U -( = Name --r- E .D Telephone (day) é8¥7 Þ . D£I¥- Corporation Street Address /3/0 t//l¡tt:1:1IJ6 ßli:5 LN . City State Zip Code 1/fT. 'pl!?oSf/E-Cr a::¿. bOeJSb Fax Pager (8'i-7 78' l-lfS 7 Interest in Property Z Name Telephone, ¡) 0 þ/ê/1? (¥'é/7) ~fl:3-37 70 ~ /ED Ð. ~ ~ ~ Corporation Telephone (evening) If 0 ~ ¡:... ~ zo Q€ Street Address Fax: Z a.> B t( /2 /f/ J /l/? B liS fl L4/, ~§' /31ð 0"" ~~ C,;)I City State Zip Code Pager ~ U 1fT fJ¡2oSfæ¡ -XL 6C1()~b { ~' ~ 78/- L/s77 < =:¡ Developer REr;;e /f/C Y (;>¡-,C ilGrF s .:p-¡JC. Telephone (day) '30 -993- CJC¡7~ Name Address 'I.>Ò #ðRr1l n/'Z /¿ /2j) . Fax b!!tJ - r; 3- 0{ 1lS' EZ-M I{JJ.RS r } ~TL . ÚJ I X- Attorney Name Telephone (day) Address Fax Surveyor Z Name Telephone (day) .. 0 I ~ Eo-< en Address Fax «; ~.~ 0,2 ¡:... 0 Z"" ~~ Qi:: Engineer ~ S Name Telephone (day) 0 §' ~Q) Address Fax ø > ~ a.> uO <I = Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax Landscape Architect Name Telephone (day): Address Fax 2 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois Code Section(s) for which VariatIon(s) is (are) Requested Summary and Justification for Requested Variation(s), Relate Justification to the Attached Standards for Variations ..::L- [,VOG/¿Ü LIKE' T 1-1 xs (rA ¡e,:¡G E" 7)u£ To tHC F4C¡ I HAvE NO R/l..5E I'1I!: NT> Bur ~ SUB RI:¡S£H E]V-r / / !ê.¡;-C/Z EA- l:r ð/U F/j/'-1.xL'y '&;c;M ~ /~X.5 DOc$~' /"' .4lLðtJ ~ AA/Y ¡ØO;t1 F'C;/f:: S~)/êA6€ ~ TH.r:..!J ~.A 12~16-c w()U ¿i::J r..:¡ ~~ o~ ¡(;J:UE /£1£ S / /')~€ FoÆ C/-fI'Z.Z::.s., fl4//S l:Jéc t) ,R.,t¡ r.:;p:"v$. J ~o ' /I AlLð tA-Æ?: N I £/C'U 7~.s GAÆAG;Ë p./(){./ '-D ,t}L/..ow ~E Té;) d I <;Tð,lZC ð'TIIERS ZTEM5 As' ~JE¿.t) LJ4wN r-t..I,e~-rU/iG', OCI~ ./ }/AA.D 5v PPL...z:£5 I L ~ þt::€ÆS A g&J; ~Æ?x¿¿. ç,c . . ..:r: t/AV6" u < " , A B4ss &:A f T¡..}()T .:r wa/LD UK£' ,ð .5 'TiJ teE .T".,(I.$z:£;),¡;/ ð F' ¡tfJ/ GAKIfGE ::t::A.)STEA D () P ß €.:uJ!; ,.g 1'/ "e~EA..IE¡.)Þ t47H -/I /2 ç:.- - , FeE" rél S;r¡:;/Ze..zr ¡;;¡¿.séwI-lERE. IT ~tI ¿þ A¿ltP#(,I ~& TO #lRK ;t4V (/Eh'ZCLE"-S .:z:.ÆISZL)€ AU .sEA. SON" {¿'Sl'-t;cx4UY lÆr A/T1L R... M,Y .z::-A/'Tt A./ r:z:O/V Z 5. Tn t.:z::Uti'...z:A/ /"'/7: ~~6Pea- ¡:=¿:;£ ,¡if L-ONG- ï::Z:M £' ÆA../D r~z-.:s G-/1If!A6£ /! t 5£'E 8 ~r I- (") (.-t.I .: Please note that thé application will not be accepted until this petition has been fully completed and all required plans and other materials have been satisfactorily submitted tothe Planning Division. It is strongly suggested that the petitioner schedule an appointment with the ,appropriate Village staff so that materials can be reviewed for accuracy and completeness prior to submittal. In consideration ofthe information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agents permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affmn that all infonnation provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to th. e. best of my. kn.OWled~~ r~... ... Applicant .-/ ~d ~ d~ Date /0"" /8 --¿::J'/ ,~_.."----J If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the Variation(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Pmperty Own" ~ 'V - '~ J r:- ~JU'tD~ ¡#C/AI-D $ W~p,,"r Ì""IC tA..lLï'+1 (HE AléE:D£b STo¡¿fi6£ A-/l/D GIUJ..I,q,tJCG /){-E' BFA-u-rr o¡:::: fl1Y .P .lee ,P E ¡t{"T" Y ~ Date /0-/8 -oý Mount Prospect Department of Community Development 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect Illinois, 60056 3 Phone 847.818.5328 Fax 847.818.5329 TDD 847.392.6064 »- .. ~egency gUftugeg 450 N. York Road Elmhurst, Illinois 60126 630-993-0476 Regency Garages has been contracted to build a 3D' x 25' detached garage at 1310 Burning Bush Lane in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The specifications for the garage are: . 30' x 25' detached garage (750 square feet) . Reverse gable roof with 6/12 pitch . ~~~;: height 15 feet 4 inches . vV T'£ vinyl siding with Pewter Grey architectural roof shingles . Wall height 9 feet . Two overhead door 16' x 8' and 10' x 8' . One 36 inch service doqr and two sliding windows . Rear yard setback is 15"feet - this includes the easement . Side yard setback is 5 feet on south side and 13 feet on the west side. If you are not opposed to the erection of the above garage please provide your address and sign your name below. do4--vJ jli-v~_,- fo/11{o~/ i~" I ¡ .0_. Hì. ^ Ii ~u' ~ A ¡, J Jtb{A {[,,7(V . ~{ 0 I, 7ft, Y L/~ t -toY¿ 'IA~ I-~ ð 011, t9c-/¿/l /Þ7? !3 l-{ 5Þ; (~/~V/r¡, ýi. ~:. \\'~1 A <-¿..-f. ~7 .'~ '---'--- . if / [) -- /'1 - ð ~ Name ~- i ¡ \ 'V\. -t- (or I Add ress J3vG. þ"u(:vr.J<, !1'<J ¡-.\¿t .J 11 Hlil{!~J ('¡ .1,' » !-rrz;( i' It) /35/ (; ¡';oL( ßl,{¿,^>J)V.) fb.¡¿.i, L¡->, ,- . ---. ~,) , ,4fi-'/ m J fi ,7£. C I- //~7,f if ¿¡ ,¿ ¿£,//() 6- ~.5 ;¡- . A I" E Ð jJ A- 1\1)0 ¡Î " F?}J lA [¡)c d1 13 ¡.~ ~~ 1J RfJ; I.J (:- . . . fS,L-l')H Signature / Date //, ./ ~v<-Ø~ '~y/IJ '7 ,;// /¿>? -- I -¿;7 i,£ I~, 16 ~Á-'Ct/ j tJ .... i J.. ì ,";J. 0 \) '-I .. CRegency ga/(age~ 450 N. York Road Elmhurst, Illinois 60126 630-993-0476 Regency Garages has been contracted to build a 30' x 25' detached garage at 1310 Burning Bush Lane in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The specifications for the garage are: . 30' X 25' detached garage (750 square feet) . Reverse gable roof with 6/12 pitch . Ga~e height 15 feet 4 inches . .p~vvte1 vinyl siding with Pewter Grey architectural roof shingles . Wall height 9 feet . Two overhead door 16' x 8' and 10' x 8' . One 36 inch service doorand two sliding windows . Rear yard setback is, 1!.?feet,:-- this includes the easement . Side yard setback is 5 feet on 'south side and 13 feet on the west side. If you are not opposed to the erection of the .above garage please provide your address and sign your name below. (vClv1 k' II ;+5(;( \/(¡ j) £<Á " ~Vcn"c 307 N, PIrl\A VI. 5+c 'dV-J Ct." M 1. P to"> f<='c. T I'L ¿'o,o5~ Name j;1f!Jcil . - filt GyCi ~ \ é)t i<.ttft ~ ~~.):> Address !};53 tta. Î/J r RtOJf /iL2Á J:L-. { .3 LV s:- .' i )]I '9 La;)e.. pvl t ,bJ-t} '; \ ~~'t -LC ; J / !3u;) ß\Jvn,o ß\b~ ¡{JIzz/LvI ~;}. . ') / ~i ,/ .' I 22 '~'jA,4f~.< " ¡c!J 'J¡ j 0 J- ~ ~ §? Cf,J2Þ / (;) 7-1 ðl t . ¡ /. ' J .I í i fj l/ 0 L/6 R..5-Lze;D G/?~;%-~ES :z;:A./ ðT- p/(:osf'ECT: 3 - 4 CÆ/f:.. /. ~O4 WILSHXR.~ L.N. 3 C-AIZ 7~D ~. 1=+. d. Ie¡ J 8' LJ ODl) LiJ . 3cAR.. 751.0 j%. FT- 13. 70d W1:.I\)])5oR.. De. L CAR- 750 + Sj' t=r. ILl. 140~ f(oBt::¡¿T DR.... 3 cA~ Soo + -Sð.Pr. 15-,5; ( . l:/15Tl'1fttJ Die.. 3--4 CAP- ?BL, D€€P. I~' tlól , Kc~SJ:IV{;T(i1\J (u¡V;r;VC<>Æ!'ceJITED J :; C-III¿ 7;;J(1+sç 1"("'. ~---.' ,.~._~ -- =¿~ <--. . or- ,> -:.r'. . '\.'. ::-I~ ,'- PLAT OF SURVEY OF CHAIN LINK FENCE -' '" --, ' - LINK FENCE , <II -.~ cr¡ IN CHAIN LINK - "- II) BRICK 8 FRAME ~J"', RESIDENCE ,~ ~~;,~~~ DUCU , "26J2 LOT 298 ::z ..J ¡:: I ~ . :J ~ I ~ ' , IL , f- 2: \U ~ I ~ , <t I~ ~ 5 It ~ ---- 0 . l{) (.0 -~" '\ 0 li' ... ~un..,n- _vv' , - -\ \" \ , I <t '" ' >< I . \ lo~l. I I ,2:' :i: ' I '" ~ i ; ,.¡ I ' >< 11:' , '" I 2,01 ., IIJ j' &h' 'y 0 ~~ j ; N ' . 1"'- ~,¡ i "', . . ' 28J5, - ll._---- ~ ---29.90- ...-,.1'0, ,'" 29,90 '~. . CONCRETE). DRIVEWAY ..; --,~-~-------- ------ U) FRAME GARAGE ---- .~ 'RON , 'PE "" 22.22 :2 " ' ..; .._-_._~v 'r "CORNER POST 0,3 SOUTH 0,8 EAST FENCE :1/40.0 CHAIN LINK POST L4 SOUTH 1< ¡ ! i CONCRETE' 0,84 NORTH U'U t;SIl tl.vO ¡\'O'/'I-,','" Dilll/?lIsÎtms shm/'lIlhus: !j{),,:;; 1//'(,-",,'1 111111 ,/t-l'illlfli purls IIw","!f Allyulu)' dolo ,~hm/'lIlIlIIs: fI()' ()O' 1)1)" il/llicl/ll' d,'y""/'s, /II i 1111 II's (/1/11 s(''(Jl/(ls, 1/4 OF SECTION 25, II II ¡' il II ,I I! ;¡ . I' . 'I ' ~ t: .I~¡ , : ," ; I ' ' Ii , I :, " !: tll PIPE LOT 298 IN THE BRICKMAN MANOR SECOND ADDITION UNIT NO, O~E, A SU~D!VrSION OF PAPT OF THE ~OPTHWEST TO¡'¡NSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL ~iERIDIAN, I~J cnOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ......"...-..-.--.-.--. WOW------. ------'. FENCE " CHAIN LINK POST 140.0 '~, O,SSOUTH IRON PIPE \ /~I I ," i \. i 3/,90 -'II', I, .1 'Id !to iU) ¡ : ¡ . I ! I I STA'.rE OF ILL!. N. OI.S } COUNTY OF COOK SS, !jO.:!5 /:V .110" Of/' (JO" 1-; illllinlll's II"'(/SII"" diuWI(S;'JI/ / Iw(/,'i'(II. (50,:?5) / (s .e}()' (J(J' 1)0" 1-:) i",Ji,."I,'S """,1111 tI;l(l('l(siol( / Iwllril(Y. (50,;!.'; tI), / (N .'!O' Oil' O{)"¡',' "I ; ",I i('//','.~ tI"",/ mil tI i UII'I(S ift II 111"1/ ri II!I 2 -J :r: U) :) CD (!) :z: - :Z:w Q::w :) ...J CD----- ---... I- ltJ ltJ a:: I- U) I s l\ \ I I 1 II \ II ! i ".. - ,\ J!"lIril(!lssh/lI/'lIlwn'oll, ii'lIl(lI,lII'rl,wlllo,.IISSIIII/,'dduIU.IlII¡"sssh",I'" ollwrll'is,', I, ./II""'S (', (',,/lw,,)'I(' II, "" III;"/li-, !',.".r"""iolllli L(/ud '\""1'/'1/"" tIll 1"",,'lul"'Tlifll Ihll' 11"1/',, '''In'''lI'''' Ih/' IIhlll'" ,("",.,.;1".<1 1""'II/""lI, 1//111 11,,11 /1","111"'" /,/1/1 i" II ('(".,.",., 1"'1""" s"l(llIli"" '!i's"itl.~II/1"'!!' (-'Oll/Imrr lI/lurl'/lilils 1":1;",,, I/s;oy SII"'" ,,1/(1 /'I'II/,,'IUlIlI "i(i¡"',>"""s iml(lI'diul,'I!!, l'IIIIIli/ll', lIIil(lIis ----~pg!l.1.~,.>...}.QQJ--,..-----,--- E)N \v[(Dposero-. ~ (LEE STREET) ~=~-;~;; ;=-=:~ ~- ~~~? ---._------- S~1E flLAN SCALE l' = 'JH 0 0 ~ ~ -- - ---- ----- -----------------l I I I ! '0 (7) ;;) i ; 1 - i 01 ~i (7)1 Ni ! -- .--------------------j /-NEW CONCRETE WALK! / ;/ /--------------------".1 ~ !... 12.15X2.0 OVERHANG! z - , r------- . 0 ,11,50' u 2.01 == w z 65.0' 11.8' 36.87' N EXISTING NO. 1310 BURNING BUSH LN.~ <D RESIDENCE TO ~ N REMAIN 48.24' 23.62X2.0 OVERHANG I /' I L______-------,,:"'¡ I / !...-----------_-../ 8.19' NEW CONCRETE 10 fO !~ i ~ 3X3D --CDNCRETE-A PRD!ir; '0 Lri N I I I ! ! I 1 I I I I i i 1 I I I I I I i fTED DRAG . I 11310 BURNING BUSH LN" MT. PROSPECT, IL I ¡REGENCY GARAGES ¡ 1450 N, YORK ROAD I I ELMHURST, IL 60126 I NEW 1 STORY FRAME GARAGE 30.0' , \J'> ¡:: 5.0' 65.0' I I ! SITE PLAN & NOTES ..LJ . . , ;. ;¡', , f ': REGENCY GARAGES 450 N. YORK RD. ELMHURST, IL 60126 (630) 993-0476 c. . NO SWAY BRACING PLYWOOD WALLS 12in 25 YEAR SEAL TAB SHINGLES OVER 15 LB. FELT 1/2 INCH PLYWOOD ROOF SHEATHING BIRD'S MOUTH CUT DOUBLE 2" x 12" HEADER 2" x 6" RAFTER TIES 2" X 6" RAFTERS 2" X 8" RIDGE 16" O.C. 2" X 4" STUD FRAMING 16" O.C. ROOF TYPE Reverse Gable %" PLYWOOD WALL SHEATHING GARAGE SIZE W 30' L 25' SIDING TYPE: VINYL %" BOLTS x 1 a" x 6' D.C. RAISED WATER LEDGE. 4 SIDES 2 "x4 II TREATED BOTTOM PLATES Owner Information Ted Drag 1310 Burning Bush Lane Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 847-298-3770 Footing Depth 18 in 5 in. CONCRETE w/MESH 4 in. CRUSHED STONE Footing Width 12 in. ,'------------..--."..------ .---..-----.--.-- --..-.---.-.---.------.--. - i i ¡ I j I I - -.-_u_----.--.---- -------.--.---. -- -.- .-------.--- - ---...----- .-----...-------.----.--.------------- --------- ------------------.--- .--------.- i I I T~ I ! / T /PLA TE 'I . ~ ~ '0 I 0. IFOUNDA TION 16' o' """ l J 10 k- f l '- - Ll / 10'-0. , 6r 12"x12" ROOF VENTS g -.-----..----.-.----....] , I I I I I 35# ASPHALT OOF SHINGLES WTER GREY VINYL SIDING ~ tt::CíE GRADE OH GARAGE DOOR \ tA~) 10X8 6r OH GARAGE DOOR 16X8 J 30'-0. ~- i I REAR (~V~) --....-.-.------.-.---.----... INSULA TED METAL DOOR PER PLAN 1'-0. í I I I I I I I I I i , ! RIG H b~!QfJ~g.eIH+--_.._--_._------¡ . ITED DRAG i '1310 BURNING BUSH LN.. MT. PROSPECT, IL I REGENCY GARAGES ¡ 450 N. YORK ROAD I ELMHURST. IL 60126 PH. 630-993-0476 I ._-______n____J_~~IŒJQJLElEVATION~- JJ:::_~-- -_._~~~~_J \"48'24 ~NDOWS 7 / j 25'-0. J 3'="6 í=O T=õ T=õ" LEFT SIDE (~V.~) '---.---------..-.- ,-----,-....-'--".-....--.-.'-----.--.-----.-'-'---.----.....---.--.. .-,.-,'--.-'--" ------------...---------,...-. .------.-. VWL 2/9/05 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1310 BURNING BUSH LANE WHEREAS, Ted Drag (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for a Variation with respect to property located at 1310 Burning Bush Lane (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property") and legally described as follows: Lot 298 in the Brickman Manor Second Addition Unit No. One, a subdivision of part of the northwest 1/4 of Section 25, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois Property Index Number: 03-25-123-003-0000; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a Variation to allow an oversized detached garage; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of Case No. PZ-46-04 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 2ih day of January, 2005, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Journal & Topics on the 12th day clJanuary, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings arid negative recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. A Page 2/2 1310 Burning Bush Lane NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Variation, as provided in Section 14.203.C of the Village Code, to allow a 750 square-foot detached garage, with a 13.25' height exceeding the maximum size of 672 square feet and 12' height allowed by Village Code, as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A" SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2005. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Velma W. Lowe Village Clerk H\CLKO\files\WINIORDINANCIVariation-1310 BurnBush,ovrsz garage,FebO5.doc '1 E)N '~.~'þ¡jBUCT . .. .-. --.... n.. .-... - ._.._~-AP.RON/./ '>.~-~~~~:.:~~~~iQ~WÃrß~'.~':~:~.: .... -- .--. '___'n '-."..---... ... 65.0' "0 ~ n , ÑEw:cQNç[(rËW~Œl I=! I~ 'u IZ 0 U ;;:: w Z , ; r-------T EXISTING NO. 1310 BURNING BUSH LN RESIDENCE TO REMAIN i.._~~.~~=.~-===.._=)"~ .0 0 .q- " NEW CONCRETE '0 .,.¡ N NEW 1 STORY FRAME GARAGE 30.0' \1' ~ 65.0' . 0 0 .q- ~ 5.0' ~ ~ --1 .~~ ,,' " -1 -\ :lì --1 -1 -, ....., (t'\ ~Ù -., ""..., ... '-1 -" "'..., :.;~ 0 ~Û -::1 =1 Q..'\ "1-1 '1 ~ ...~ ~ "":~ .-1 ~" -1 .-] -\ :l'\ :.; ~ :>-- ~;:::::, ~I ~ -I -'Ioo¡ '-I ;-, , \.~ -'Ioo¡ '-I 1 ~ .:L¡ C) -1 -1 0 "'--1 .t......, -" ",..., ...-1 .. ._, -i "'..., > ~ -1 -" ",..., -I .:L¡ :L-ì .t......, "-1 ~','Ì 1".. --, []) æ .r--- .0-.& .~-.c, ----- ~~ W:;.> O::::~ '--' B ~ r--~ ~.'" l...i....~ ~ -I --.¡ =.'";) -I -1 :1.-'1 -I "'~1 .->6\ ...."~ ~ì ~Ù -\ ...."', .. .-1 -\ """" ......",\. -....., ~W -1 -' -I -I "'-4 -1 '-I .. '-1 ."'" - ""1 ("""""I -:-i "",.""" \ .j ~I -"!..¡ "', ? , \.~ -.-.., "I 1 N ,. --I ~'1 I....- ¡ -I -ì ~'\ ~l "-1 =~ .. ._, t (L.:'I :::.~ 0 --1 '-1 ;;::) "-1 ~ :.... . ~ """" .. "'""""1 .. .'-1 -. "'..., '-. v' :>"') -I '-I ~ "'-1 ~I-' -ì ....", ~ ~, -t :.~ -\ -' ~, ;..., ~ """'" --I 0 .. .-1 .:L¡