The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5.6 Motion to Accept Proposal for Environmental Services 8/28/2019 BoardDocs®Agenda Item:7.2 7.2a PZ-02-18/15-19 N. Elmhurst Ave./Rich Bondarowicz 7.2a. RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL ... v „tllr, T-77 Agenda Item Details Meeting Mar 20, 2018 - SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 5. CONSENT AGENDA Subject 5.6 Motion to accept proposal for Environmental Engineering Services in an amount not to exceed $22,990. Type Action (Consent) Preferred Date Mar 20, 2018 Absolute Date Mar 20, 2018 Fiscal Impact Yes Dollar Amount 22,990.00 Budgeted Yes Budget Source Flood Control Construction Fund Recommended Action Accept the proposal for specified environmental engineering services submitted by Manhard Consulting of Vernon Hills, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $22,990 in 2018 and $22,990 in 2019. Information The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is a compilation of federal regulations promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under rule-making authority established by the 1972 Clean Water Act. In summary, and among other requirements, NPDES rules require owners and operators of municipally-owned separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) in partially or fully urbanized areas to obtain permits for the discharge of storm water into receiving waters such as creeks, rivers, or lakes. In Illinois, the USEPA has delegated administration of this program to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). In order to obtain a permit, IEPA requires municipalities to demonstrate compliance with federal NPDES regulations by preparing and executing a stormwater management plan. This plan is intended to support implementation of best practices for reducing pollutant discharges to waterways. For reference, a copy of the Village's stormwater management plan along with annual update reports can be found on the Mount Prospect website (www.mountprospect.org). In addition to this reporting, NPDES compliance requires annual inspections of 120 storm sewer outfalls, annual water quality testing of waterways at Village entry and exit points, annual staff training, and annual external inspections of 40-50 high risk commercial or industrial sites to look for illicit discharges or sources of stomwater pollution. For reference, copies of the Village's most recent outfall inspection report, water quality testing results, and industrial / commercial site MS4 inspection form are attached. Request for Proposals (RFP), To complete these tasks, staff requires assistance from an environmental engineering consultant with requisite technical knowledge and experience. To solicit qualified consultants, a request for proposals (RFP) was prepared and distributed to three (3) area firms. A copy of this RFP is attached. The RFP requests referenced services and pricing for a two (2)-year term commencing in 2018 and concluding at the end of 2019. Three (3) proposals were received. Each proposal was evaluated based on the background of the firm, related project experience, proposed services and scope of work, schedule, work effort, and proposal content. Each firm received a point ranking (total points = 100) for each criteria. Table 1 below summarizes this analysis: https://go.boarddocs.com/iI/vom p/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=AWA2B57 F2456 1/3 8/28/2019 BoardDocs®Agenda Item:7.2 7.2a PZ-02-18/15-19 N. Elmhurst Ave./Rich Bondarowicz 7.2a. RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL ... Table 1 - Consultant Rankings Category Max. Points Manhard Consulting Baxter Woodman Gewalt Hamilton Background 20 18 19 16 Experience 20 19 17 15 Scope 25 24 20 18 Schedule 15 13 12 10 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Work Effort 10 8 7 5 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Content 10 10 9 8 Total: 100 92 83 72 The highest rated firm was Manhard Consulting of Vernon Hills, Illinois (Manhard). Manhard features employees with extensive experience in MS4 permitting and NPDES compliance assistance including work with the Villages of Arlington Heights, Buffalo Grove, and the City of Des Plaines. All reference checks indicate that their work has been acceptable. Manhard has also provided similar assistance to the Village in the past including water quality testing, annual report preparation, IEPA audit guidance, and storm sewer outfall inspections. All of their work has been satisfactory. Proposal costs were also analyzed and summarized in Table 2 below: Table 2 - Cost Summaries Firm 2018 Cost2019 CosTotal Cost 1$58,982 Gewalt Hamilton $17,404 $17,404 $34,808 ManharaCons ultin209002090041,800Baxter&Woodman29,4929,491 ................ The lowest cost proposal was submitted by Gewalt Hamilton of Vernon Hills, Illinois (Gewalt Hamilton). Analysis of the work effort associated with these costs indicates the firm anticipated extensive utilization of lower cost summer interns to complete much of the work. It is the opinion of staff that the best interests of the Village are served using experienced personnel on work that is subject to regulatory review and holds potential for stakeholder interaction. The second-lowest cost proposal was submitted by Manhard Consulting. Discussions with Manhard revealed they intend to utilize experienced engineers and stormwater management professionals to complete the work. Consequently, staff has concluded that advantages of personnel quality negate the relatively nominal cost difference between Manhard and Gewalt Hamilton proposals. Alternatives 1. Accept proposal from Manhard Consulting for specified environmental engineering services. 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal for specified environmental engineering services submitted by Manhard Consulting of Vernon Hills, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $22,990 in 2018 and $22,990 in 2019. 2017 Water Quality Testing MP FINAL.PDF (4,685 KB) MS4 Indus_Comm Program.pdf (43 KB) Proposal for Engineering Services - NPDES Compliance.pdf (2,917 KB) Manhard NPDES Compliance Proposal _ 2018_2019.pdf (355 KB) 2017 Outfall Inspection Report 09272017_EXCERPT.pdf (3,049 KB) All items under Consent Agenda are considered routine by the Village Board and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of those items unless a Board member or member from the audience so requests, in https://go.boarddocs.com/iI/vom p/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=AWA2B57 F2456 2/3 8/28/2019 BoardDocs®Agenda Item:7.2 7.2a PZ-02-18/15-19 N. Elmhurst Ave./Rich Bondarowicz 7.2a. RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL ... which the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its sequence on the agenda. Motion &Voting Accept the monthly financial report for February 2018. Motion by Paul Hoefert, second by Colleen Saccotelli. Final Resolution: Motion Carries Yea: William Grossi, Eleni Hatzis, Paul Hoefert, Richard Rogers, Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel https://go.boarddocs.com/iI/vom p/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=AWA2B57 F2456 3/3 Year 15 Water Quality Monitoring & Assessment Program Water Quality Testing Report for Sampling Conducted in October-November 2017 Prepared for: Village of Mount Prospect Cook County, IL W Hanhard rr IIIIIIIU,� tap vi VIIII,,,,II,,,,A IL, OF II UINt' IPRQSIPIECTi YEAR 15,......WATER QUAII,,,.II Y TlEs"nING RIS II,,,,'T Caintents I. Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1 11. Water Quality Monitoring & Assessment Program...........................................................................4 111.Test Locations ....................................................................................................................................... 2 IV.Testing Parameters............................................................................................................................... 3 V. Results....................................................................................................................................................4 VI.Summary.............................................................................................................................................. 15 III,,,,,,II S t Of III::::::JU 1°EN s Figure 1 Receiving Waters Figure 2 Impaired Waters III,,,,,abIles es Table 1 Typical Pollutants and Potential Sources Table 2 Municipal Activities with Potential for Generating Pollutants Table 3 IEPA Assessment Summary Table 4 Accepted Limits for Each Water Quality Parameter III,,,,,,liis t of ApI13E,flndces Appendix 1 Site Location Map Appendix 2 Lab Report tap vi VIIII,,,,II,,,,AGE OF II OUINI" IPIROSPIECU YEAR 15 WATIER QUAII,,,.1ITY TlES'1C"11NG IRIESlU11,,,'TS IIII IIII I11rl 111ro d u1i Ct 1110 11rl f;;;;:.:xe a 1Jive Surnrrar The Village of Mount Prospect developed this Water Quality Monitoring &Assessment Program as required by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit program. The NPDES MS4 permit program regulates the discharge of storm water from MS4s based on amendments to the Clean Water Act in 1987 and the subsequent 1990 and 1999 regulations by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). In Illinois, the USEPA delegated administration of the federal NDPES MS4 permit program to the IEPA. Under the NPDES MS4 permit program, all MS4s partially or fully in urbanized areas based on the 2000 census are required to obtain storm water permits for their discharges into receiving waters. On December 20, 1999, the IEPA issued a General NPDES Storm Water Permit for all MS4s (ILR40 permit). The IEPA reissued the ILR40 permit on February 20, 2012 and again on February 10, 2016. In the 2016 permit, a new requirement was included in the ILR40 permit for water quality monitoring and assessment. The Village started water quality testing in 2012 under the previous permit. This document describes the Water Quality Monitoring &Assessment Program that is implemented by the Village of Mount Prospect to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented by the Village to reduce pollutant loadings and water quality impacts. This is accomplished through annual water quality testing of receiving waters upstream and downstream of the Village. 1::::-1ernnit Coverage As previously noted, the ILR40 permit authorizes the discharge of storm water from MS4s into receiving waters. Storm water is defined in the ILR40 permit as "storm water runoff, snow melt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage". MS4s contain a conveyance or system of conveyances that are: owned by a state, Village, town, or other public entity that discharges storm water to waters of the U.S.; designed or used to collect or convey storm water (e.g., storm drains, pipes, ditches); not a combined sewer; and not part of a sewage treatment plant, or publicly owned treatment works. Regulated conveyance systems typically include roadway drainage systems, storm sewers, catch basins, gutters, ditches, swales, manmade channels, and storm sewers. lRecei° liiiri Waters A receiving water is a natural or man-made system into which storm water is discharged, including major rivers such as the Des Plaines River and its tributary stream systems. Receiving waters within the Village include (see Figure 1): • McDonald Creek • Weller Creek • Feehanville Ditch • Higgins Creek ::� 1 1If age tap vi V1111 11 AGE OF Il II INI" F SIP IE, T YEAR 15 WATER QUAII„,.II Y TlEsruNG PIESUIl,,,TS IFii quire 1 Receiving Waters NlcDonald GreekN N. 9 P o,1 1 °;lff W ;Ff hu a Feehar¢wMr= CPi'ta-.t” r f -a. ti m , uPIlwr creek �w t �n � a ti f: Legend rs MOUnt Prospect Hi i,_ n s CrepkI Stoirrn Water I1::::'dl11LAta rAs of Cancerri Polluted storm water runoff is commonly transported through MS4s, and then often discharged, untreated, into local waterways. Storm water runoff naturally contains numerous constituents; however, urbanization and urban activities (including municipal activities) typically increase concentrations to levels that may impact water quality. The typical pollutants found in urban storm water include sediment, nutrients, fecal coliform, chlorides, oil and grease, pesticides, herbicides, F:1 age 1If age tap vi VIIII,,,11 AGE OF IIVIOUNI" IPRQSPIE 7i YEAR 15 WATER QUAII I Y TIEs"nING RIESIUII,,,'TS and metals. Table 1 identifies the pollutants of concern for the Village and their potential sources. Table 2 identifies a list of municipal activities that have the potential for generating pollutants. Table 1 Typical Pollutants and Potential Sources Sediment Construction sites Streambank erosion Nutrients Fertilizers Sanitary sewer overflows Pet waste Fecal Coliform Untreated sewage Improper restaurant practices Pet waste Excessive organic debris Chlorides De-icing salts Sanitary sewer overflows Illicit connections Parking lots and streets Spills and leaks Oil &Grease Automotive facilities Motor lubricants Illicit discharges Hydraulic fluids Pesticides & Herbicides Residential lawn care Commercial lawn care Rust from automobiles Metals Moving engine parts Tire and brake lining wear Diesel fuel and gasoline exhaust Lubricating oil Table 2 Municipal Activities with Potential for Generating Pollutants " Building Maintenance and Repair Street Sweeping and Cleaning Parking Lot Maintenance Street Repair and Maintenance Landscape Maintenance Bridge and Structure Maintenance Waste Handling and Disposal Sidewalk Surface Repair and Cleaning Vehicle Fueling and Storage Tank Filling Landscape Mowing/Trimming/Planting Equipment Maintenance and Repair Fertilizer and Pesticide Application Vehicle and Equipment Storage Solid Waste Collection and Recycling Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Material Handling and Storage Material Loading and Unloading Status of Waters The most recent Integrated Water Quality Report and Section 303(d) List prepared by the IEPA can be found at http://www.epa.state.ii.us/water/water-quality/index.htmi. The assessment completed in 2016 by the IEPA identified impairments to water quality in Higgins Creek and placed it on the Illinois Integrated Water Quality Report Section 303(d) (impaired waters) List. Impaired waters within the Village are shown on Figure 2. A summary of the IEPA 2016 assessment for receiving waters in the Village is presented in Table 3. At this time, no TMDL requirements have been issued for the portion of Higgins Creek located within the Village (see Table 3). ::� 2 1If age tap vi V1111 II,,,,AGE OF II IJ IN' ' IPI IP IE, T YEAR 15,......WATER QUAII„,.II Y TlEsruNGRIESU11„,'T IFii uire 2 lirmmpaiiire teirs, I'vIcDo n all aver. N � F'77' �- I,� (j �J'V't( J� Po ” Fiephanville Ditch .... .ora„IaIl t F d o s re c t' q ; ro 1�1 w, r Legend MOU11t PrOSPed Water ays Impaired La kes(lEPA 303d List 2:016), l� f leer ins C d el Impaired Streams(lEPA303d List 20 16) ::1 tap vi IIII,,,11 AGE OF II OUINI" IPIROSIPIEC7i YEAR 15 WATIER QUAII„,.II Y TlEsriNG IRIESIUII,,,'TS Table 3 IEPA Assessment Summary (2016) 11 11111'�1110 MEN=EMEMM Higgins Creek Aquatic Life • Chloride Urban Runoff/Storm Approved 8/26/2013 (does not GOA-02 • Fecal Coliform Sewers include the section of Higgins • Dissolved Oxygen Creek within the Village limits) 11111, IA �I�III II III I11ri liii i11r'i'I III�i ' ssessIII(' IIe11r"Im IIII°2Illr gllr' IIII �IM O in lIt,o r'ii in This Water Quality Monitoring &Assessment Program has been developed for the Village of Mount Prospect for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the minimum standards required by the ILR40 permit for discharges from MS4s. The ILR40 permit requires annual monitoring of receiving waters upstream and downstream of MS4 discharges, use of indicators to gauge the effects of storm water discharges on the physical/habitat-related aspects of the receiving waters, and/or monitoring of the effectiveness of the BMPs. Per the ILR40 permit, monitoring of storm water discharges must be performed within 48 hours of a precipitation event greater than or equal to 0.25” in a 24-hour period. The ILR40 permit requires analysis of storm water for the following parameters: • Total suspended solids • Fecal coliform • Total nitrogen • Chlorides • Total phosphorous • Oil and grease Assess tne in t Illinois' water pollution control program is designed to protect the beneficial uses of water resources. Illinois has set water quality standards (WQS) that protect these beneficial uses, commonly referred to as "designated uses". In Illinois, waters are designated for various uses including aquatic life, wildlife, agricultural use, primary contact (e.g., swimming, water skiing), secondary contact (e.g., boating, fishing), industrial use, drinking water, food-processing water supply, and aesthetic quality. Illinois' WQS provide the basis for assessing whether the beneficial uses of the state's waters are being attained. This Water Quality Monitoring &Assessment Program includes an assessment of the quality of receiving waters based on annual testing. Annual test results are compared against the water quality standards (WQS) established by the Illinois Pollution Control Program (IPCB). Not all the constituents included in the Village's Water Quality Monitoring &Assessment Program have an established limit under the General Use Water Quality Standard and are therefore compared to an industry accepted standard. The Illinois WQS are located in the Illinois Administrative Rules Title 35, Environmental Protection; Subtitle C, Water Pollution; Chapter I, Pollution Control Board; Part 302, Water Quality Standards. The purpose of these standards is to protect existing uses of all waters of the State of Illinois, maintain above standard water quality, and prevent unnecessary deterioration of waters of the State. Table 4 identifies the section of the IPCB standards (or other reference material) used for the purposes of this analysis. This analysis is in no way meant to identify violations of the IPCB Standards. ::� 4 1If age tap vi VIIII,,,,II,,,,AGE OF Il IIIN I" IPIR SIPE,C t YEAR 15 WATIER QUAII,,,.IITY TlEsruNG RIESIUII,,,,TS IIIIIIIIIIII 111""'est 1111 ocatiloinis, Water samples are taken at locations upstream and downstream of the Village's discharge into receiving waters. Upstream and downstream results are compared to identify any areas of concern that are potentially contributing to water pollution in receiving waters. In the Village of Mount Prospect, eight (8) sites have been chosen for water quality testing at upstream and downstream locations. A location map is included in Appendix 1 of this report which identifies the testing locations. 110611'..),oinald Creek SITE 1 The test site is an unnamed tributary to McDonald Creek, located east of Fairway Drive between Golf View Circle and Fairway Court on the boundary between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Village of Prospect Heights. In this report, this site is considered an upstream location for McDonald Creek. SITE 2 The test site is McDonald Creek located south of Edward Road on the boundary between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Village of Prospect Heights. In this report, this site is considered an upstream location for McDonald Creek. SITE 3 The test site is McDonald Creek located on the south side of Kensington Road, east of North Woodland Drive and west of North River Road on the boundary between the Village of Mount Prospect and Unincorporated Cook County. In this report, this site is considered a downstream location for McDonald Creek. if e 111°maurmvliillllll IIG;UIiitch SITE 4 The test site is Feehanville Ditch located on the east side of North Wolf Road, north of Longford Drive on the boundary between the Village of Mount Prospect and the City of Des Plaines. In this report, this site is considered a downstream location for Feehanville Ditch. eIIIIIIer Creek SITE 5 The test site is Weller Creek located just west of the intersection of West Cleven Avenue and Weller Lane in the Village of Mount Prospect. In this report, this site is considered an upstream location for Weller Creek. SITE 6 The test site is Weller Creek located on the west side of Mount Prospect Road, north of South Josephine Court and south of Fletcher Drive on the boundary between the Village of Mount Prospect and the City of Des Plaines. In this report, this site is considered a downstream location for Weller Creek. II°°Illliiggllins Creelk SITE 7 The test site is Higgins Creek located 1,000 feet south of Algonquin Road between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Village of Arlington Heights. In this report, this site is considered an upstream location for Higgins Creek. ::� 1If age tap vi VIIII,,,,II,,,,AGE OF II QUINI" IPIRQSPIEC7i YEAR 15 WATER QUAII„,.IITY TlEsruNG RIESUII,,,,TS SITE 8 The test site is Higgins Creek located at the east end of Terminal Drive east of the intersection of Terminal Drive and Badger Drive between the Village of Mount Prospect and Unincorporated Cook County. In this report, this site is considered a downstream location for Higgins Creek. I111V1,1111 1 11 lestilhingIIIC°° ul� ulf ,�ul�u Water samples are collected at each location once per year (within 48 hours of a 0.25” rain event). Each sample is sent to a lab and analyzed for the following parameters: total suspended solids; total nitrogen; total phosphorous; fecal coliform; chlorides; and fats, oils, and grease. While not specifically required by the ILR40 permit, the following on-site measurements are completed based on common practice for evaluating general water quality: temperature, dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids, conductivity, turbidity, and pH. Sampling is conducted in accordance with EPA standard protocols. Parameters are analyzed according to Standard Methods, 17th and 18th Editions, and USEPA methods. Table 4 Acce ted Limits for Water Qualit Parameters �u m u t i «�� a tititi� u ui olio .uu . i i ii . �iiiiuu a ulu I lom I I �lil I I � I 1 I IIII IIII � m III n, II mo � �IIII VIII II III III II IIID I ��111 a lil�li i to I� II I III��IIII�WI Il�lli I I �� ltilll� �� Total Suspended Solids 304 Effluent Standards 15.0-30.0 mg/L United States Environmental Total Nitrogen Protection Agency Volunteer Stream <6.0 mg/L Manual Total Phosphorus 302.205 0.05 mg/L Illinois Administrative Code. Title 35: 200 cfu/100 ml geometric mean based on a minimum Environmental Protection; Subtitle C: of 5 samples taken over any 30-day period; Fecal Coliform Water Pollution; Chapter I: Pollution Control Board; Part 302 Water Quality 400 cfu/100 ml maximum not to be exceeded in more Standards Section 302.209 than 10%of samples taken during any 30-day period. Chlorides 302.304 500.0 mg/L Federation of Sewage Works Associations (now known as the Water Fats, Oils and Grease Environment Federation [WEF]) 100 mg/L published a Manual of Practice(MOP) 1949 111111 111111) IIII III 4� I 11 1 II�IIIIII��II��II�III�IIIII�I� IIIIII�I�III III�IIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� Temperature(°F) 302.211 December—March 60.07 Max April—February 90.0°F Max Dissolved Oxygen 302.206 March-July at least 5.0 mg/L August—February at least 3.5 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids 302.304 1,000 ppm Conductivity USEPA Volunteer Stream Monitoring 50.0—1500.00 Ns/cm Manual Turbidity D.H. Franklin, J.L....Steiiner and <50 NTU G.Wheeler(2001) pH 302.304 6.5-9.0 'Title 35 Part 302 Water Quality Standards unless otherwise noted. 3 1 ::� If age tap vi VIIII,,,,II,,,,AGE OF II OUIN I" IPI OSIPIE t YEAR 15 WAPER QUAII„,.IITY TIE,STIINO RIESIUII,,,,TS V'1111 III° es a IIII' s On October 11, 2017 and November 29, 2017, Aquatic Ecosystems Management collected water samples at ten (10) designated locations. The first sampling was conducted within twenty-four hours of an 0.89” rain event. The second sampling was conducted within twenty-four hours of an 0.86" rain event. The following is a summary of each water quality parameter tested and the results. rotdI Suis peride Illi s r :s) Total suspended solids (TSS) are particulate solid materials (organic and inorganic) that have relatively low density and are too small to settle. Usually TSS includes silt, mud, and industrial wastes. As TSS increases, turbidity increases (meaning the transparency of the water decreases). High concentrations of TSS can lower water quality by absorbing light which raises the temperature of the water thereby decreasing levels of dissolved oxygen. The combination of warmer water, less light, and less oxygen makes it difficult for some forms of life to exist. None of the receiving waters within the Village are designated as impaired for total suspended solids. The established limit for TSS is 15.0— 30.0 mg/L. Results of the TSS testing conducted from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. In 2017, four of the test locations exceeded the 30 mg/L threshold. C luTA,L S1 I lll 0 S ��Illliiiii IIIII H,,2012 Of 2.0.11.3 N 201..4 2015 H 201.6 IIIA 201..7 1.!:50.0 Cn m 1.40.0 1.. 0.0 1.20).01 ® %r ED d a.crGr.C.1 t r 90.01 N 00 „ 80.0 C 70.0 r CL 60.C.a VE m Ln 50.0 " Maximum 30.0 mg/L 40.0 m � m 301.0) ;® N W Q 201.01 1H® ' �r rntim m m �r �.,� ca � m oo oo m m oo> m m 1.01.C1 v ,r v V N m m v m v v r WV �.Cl i%�,iis "" rs�r !nnr, �;,i,,, ra,.1, ��,i,,,, , �9rr' r,f��/lr�,,, ' Nds,raS d+1y ,,;� ,�"�srrr� "��'l��✓/li �1d"u t��r,i6' „� ds,r�. NNti., ,,, ,,, ki,rii,. Site 1.. Site 2. Site 3 Site 4 SILG:!5 Site 6 Site./ Site 8 .Sllte IMuIYtl'tlllbh.'Ir 4 1 ::� If age tap vi V II II,,,11 A IE, OF II U IN I" IP R SPIE, t YEAR 15 WATER QUAII I Y TlEs"nING II IESIUII,,,'TS F'otdl IIS li tirog n Total nitrogen is an essential nutrient for plants and animals. However, an excess amount of nitrogen in a waterway may lead to low levels of dissolved oxygen and negatively alter various plant life and organisms. Sources of nitrogen include wastewater treatment plants, runoff from fertilized lawns, runoff from animal manure and storage areas, and industrial discharges that contain corrosion inhibitors. None of the receiving waters within the Village are designated as impaired for nitrogen. An acceptable range of total nitrogen is 2 mg/L —6 mg/L. Results of the total nitrogen testing conducted from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. None of the test results exceeded the 6 mg/L threshold. 1 01 1 AVIII Illi ml VIII 1 Illlf°"0 G E IIIV it (VII'' ° 6 X3.0 701..2 111,101.3 /,,;201..4 ,2015 M 2.01.6 B 201..7 7.0 Maximum 6.0 mg/L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ln v v v v v v v I.. E Y YG tY .m 2. 44.0 C Y E tY YG tY 49$ w Y 2 q E tY IIMY 3..0IN r N m J C" y d 2.0 O M O '0" d' 0 o in rl rl �t ri O O O x100 00W 000 ; O % O N N U5 r"!ON 1 �.; q o 11 r, �� n o� co o " ~ r- 00-1 jj oCoo .,: r,0000,. oo �ooa �� r, ;. 0�0aW 1...O "' �n ,.. �n r 9.0 M oa a �O c I� R r r� moe® i r �' m�� oo,,. o O 0 r P r r. N v p rf rr O �Y O O I 5 1C t el 4 P n rr �r � r 07i xrr 1 N Or , r d + 0 p c d r r r W � ua, i,d hrru ..Simi t,rr +„ era,+l n y„ airni,,,,, ,0 Site 1.. Site 2 Sii e 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site 7 Site 8 Ske Number rotdl Total phosphorus is one of the key elements necessary for animal and plant growth. Phosphorus stimulates the growth of algae and aquatic plants that provide food for fish. This may cause an increase in the fish population. However, excess phosphorus may cause disproportionate growth in algae and aquatic plants, choking waterways and using up large amounts of oxygen. Rainfall causes varying amounts of phosphorus (from fertilized lawns) to wash away from urban areas into local waterways in the form of runoff. None of the receiving waters within the Village are ::� 5 1If age tap vi V1111 II,,,,AGIE OF II G II IIS I" IP RGSIP IE 7i YEAR 15 WATER QUAII„,.II Y TlES'1C"IIII G IRIESIUII,,,,'TS designated as impaired for phosphorus. The established limit for total phosphorous is 0.05 mg/L for any reservoir or lake with a surface area of >_ 20.0 acres, or in any stream at the point where it enters any such reservoir or lake. Results of the phosphorus testing conducted from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. Five of the sites exceeded the 0.05 mg/L threshold in 2017. It should be noted that this threshold is used for streams as a guideline only as it is relevant to reservoirs and lakes. TOTAL VIII Illlh°°°' IIIII'u °°°°'11111 VIII° 01 201..2 N 2071 A Ni 20 14 201..5 UP,2016 10,201.7 0.30 Ln M 01.2:5 (Of,N, ri O O O O ii 0.2:01 00 o �F o Ln Maximum 0.05 mg/L 001.5 O O ^ N Lr) 0 u 0 d°s u D.1.0 o r. 00 O o�,y o O fJ O s.10 fV rl i'Ln Ln a”r 'f°O Y.yIy CD �illiO Ol O Ln 00 O p O dk O O a,ct O r r �d en O O O O 0,05 RE E NCI' s e l d n N Ln r eri rl u O i if 3 O rj O " C, P r O O w,,.;:. bs"® w...✓i r,„"„ , w ,.., ......r ..-. ww.,°n r O ME arra „. r., O Ok €r,d�„ `� r O O O V 0.,00 u"r�r,7 n, ura �r��x�,,,,,, � ark �r�e„� ,,, Iu ��.a �nl(r Site:1. Site 2 Site S Site 4 Site 5 Site G Site'7 Site 8 "31ite Number r E. coli is an anaerobic bacterium that grows in the intestinal track of animals. Its presence is an indication of fecal contamination and other disease-causing organisms, which are more difficult to identify and quantify, may also be present. The accepted limits for fecal coliform in Illinois are expressed in colony forming units (cfus) per 100 milliliters of water. Fully Supporting Use or "Good Water Quality” for designated beneficial uses, such as recreation or primary contact, is observed when the following limits are not exceeded: 200 cfu/100 ml geometric mean based on a minimum of 5 samples taken over any 30-day period; 400 cfu/100 ml maximum not to be exceeded in more than 10% of samples taken during any 30-day period. ::� 6 1If age tap vi V1111 II,,,,AGE OF Il II IN I" IP IR S IP IE 7i YEAR 15 WATER QUAII„,.II Y TlEs"nNG RIESIUII,,,,'TS The IEPA has determined that Higgins Creek is impaired for fecal coliform (TEPA Assessment, 2016). Fecal coliform testing began in 2016 to meet the monitoring requirements of the 2016 NPDES ILR40 permit. Results of the fecal coliform testing conducted from 2016 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. In 2017, all sites exceeded the 400 cfu/100 ml threshold. OR 201.6 0201.7 1..0000..0 o N 9000.0 0 0 o 0000 o 0 8000.0 0 0 n 7000.0 0 00 „ �a00.�a Ln 0 0 . 52Ln, 5000.0 0 0 0 0 N ' ,. O 0 a) ” 4000.0m 00m 10 iw 3000.0 rximum 200-400 Colonies 2000.0 0WO 00 1 G.Y00"fl' �r .. 61 „µ ....., e i rLn xi - 0.0 ,r •,. ..nn .M o m�C• ".." •r •:,f t. •r ,.;. ", �... r„" y „ ,,y ,. Site 1. Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 0 Site.2 Site 8 Ske Nuirn heir Cd II-SII oirid Chloride is essential to life in small doses. Chloride may enter a water system from rocks containing chlorides, agricultural runoff, industrial wastewater, oil well wastes, wastewater treatment plant effluents, and road salts. However, when chloride builds up in large quantities, it can have negative impacts on the survival of aquatic life. The IEPA has determined that Higgins Creek is impaired for Chloride (TEPA Assessment, 2016). The established limit for chloride is 500.0 mg/L. Results of the chloride testing conducted from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. None of the 2017 test results exceed the 500 mg/L standard. ::� 7 1If age tap vi VIIII,,,,II,,,,AGIE OF II OUN"I' IPROSPIECf YEAR 15 WATIER QUAII,,,.II Y TlES'1C"IING IRIESIUII,,,,'TS Z 201.2 10 201.3 201.4 2015 U 201.6 01201..7 1,200.0 0 CD 1.,1..00.0 o 1.,000.0 900.0 800.0 0 Ln 700.0 Ln Maximum 500.0 mg/L 006 0 0000 o o0 o 00 `rA.° 15007 0 — — — — ' ® ,,� u y �It o ®r,4. ® N vo , 2,1111 -4 400.0 mx i Q p O (Yi .r m„ N �n QT o O ��..� NO NlL7 O N O �N rLf3 t N a 1f, ,�r, ;;;;„ ON .. °s„> ,a"D '- N O O t� r .O M s r Fri r.tl cri0 r W .14�'0'..0 !Y� t 7 riiW P111 f p N , Ul N dO .,f �L(5 rl� s d ;00000 i 00 Lfl ri 1..4'4 .C7 a f r CD i er r Lr) /✓r. t P � AA MM r ;uii�n;,r, a "; rar,;, s an ,rhrh,n„a axilQ,ir,,,, 7u, r r 0.0iox'�iv .�%��.ii,�,,� � kimJ �7r�1t„� ?w�ri dnv�rnr,,,; 10aP Site 1.. Site 2. Site.3 Site 4 Site 5 Site G Site'7 Site 8 Ske Number ••s, •.. I s, arid ,•,,,SII"ease Oil and grease are found in wastewater and storm water either as an emulsion or as free-floating agglomerates. Chemicals, such as detergents and solvents, and mechanical agitation can cause oil and grease to become emulsified. According to the Water Environment Federation's Pretreatment of Industrial Wastes, Manual of Practice FD-3, "Grease is a general classification for grouping such materials as fats, oils, waxes, and soaps according to their effect on wastewater collection and treatment systems or their physical (semisolid) forms." For the purpose of this document, the acronym "FOG” will be used as a general term for fats, oils, and grease. By its very nature, grease will adhere to many types of surfaces, with sewers especially vulnerable to grease build-up. Over a period of time, clumps of grease will build up to the point that the sewer is completely choked. Grease also accumulates due to cooling and dilution of surfactants. None of the receiving waters within the Village are designated as impaired for fats, oils, and grease. The most commonly used numerical limit for FOG is 100 mg/L. This limit does not appear to be based upon any empirical evidence but rather on general correlations and an industry consensus that this level limits the build-up of FOG in the collection system. FOG testing began in 2016 to meet the monitoring requirements of the 2016 NPDES ILR40 permit. Results of the FOG testing conducted in 2016 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. In 2017, none of the sites ::� 8 1If age tap vi V1111 II,,,,AGE OF II O U IN I" IP I O IP IF, t YEAR 15 WATERII,,,.II Y TIE, '1C"IINO IRIESU11,,,'T exceeded the 100 mg/L threshold. N 201..6 FRI 201..7 1.00.0 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 100 mg/L 90.0 80.0 ,H 0.0 E 60.(:) 0 M 2 50.0 4M 30.0w 20.0 0 0 o a o 0 o a 1.0.0L . L . Ln U) `n Ln LnLri r vi m v m v m v m v m v m v m v m v V v v v v v v v r c 0.0 Site.1.. Site 2. Site:t Site.4 Site.5 Site 6 Siite.7 Site 8 Ske Nuirwilbeir The rates of biological and chemical processes depend on temperature. Organisms are dependent on certain temperature ranges for their optimal health. Optimal temperatures for fish depend on the species: some survive better in colder water, whereas others prefer warmer water. Benthic macroinvertebrates are also sensitive to temperature and will relocate to find their optimal temperature. If temperatures are outside this optimal range for a prolonged period, organisms become stressed and can die. Temperature also affects the oxygen content of the water (oxygen levels become lower as temperature increases), the rate of photosynthesis by aquatic plants, the metabolic rates of aquatic organisms, and the sensitivity of organisms to toxic wastes, parasites, and diseases. Causes of temperature change include weather, removal of shading streambank vegetation, impoundments, discharge of cooling water, and urban storm water inflows to the stream. None of the receiving waters within the Village are designated as impaired for temperature. The established limit for temperature is a maximum of 60° F from December through March and 90° F from April through November. Temperature readings from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. All locations are within the normal temperature range. F:1 age 1If age tap vi V1111 II,,,,AGE OF II O U INS I" IP IRO IP IEC"T YEAR 15 WATER QUAII,,,.II Y TlE '1 uNG IRIE IU II,,,,'T uuu uum uum uum �I I E VIII VIII E 1'° A I R F IIIIIII W 20)12 IS 201.3 201../4. 015 N 2011.6 00 201..7 1.1.01.() 1.00.0 Maximum 90.0°F Apr-Nov 90.0- - - - ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® - - - 80.0 o o C) o dCD 7�.0 4M d ? �d ry a o 00om ® II II.. l0 I ®� rl l0 lD m rl ^ r{ �u1,,;„O N '0 10 o Wo .., v ® a �,o.,, � �� l0 N W N N N W O N tn ID lb 05 `p �^ � � � (p l0 d' l0 Ol<D lD Ql l0 qb LlY tft � N rn l6Yk N Y di a v�r � y .. I yl:r ,7 ^I�77n aa� �'fI° 1+yin tea. �.7.t� aQ.d ift 111 d. d' V s ME MaME ximum ME 60.0 T Dec MarER 0.0 12 ER 20.0 EE W51 IN � EE ER 1.0.0 � e 0.Cl ,51 , r, „ Site 1.. Site 2. Site.1 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 'iite'7 Site 8 mite IMuim bear 1'.' 11sisdIved Oxygeri (IDO) One of the most important measures of the health of a stream is the amount of available dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water. Oxygen gas dissolves in water through the mixing of the water surface with the atmosphere. Oxygen is vital to fish and other animals for respiration. If the levels of DO fall too low, many species of fish, macroinvertebrates, and plants cannot survive. The level of DO in the water is inversely related to water temperature. The lower the temperature, the more oxygen can dissolve in the water. Aquatic animals are most vulnerable to lowered DO levels in the early morning on hot summer days when stream flows are low, water temperatures are high and aquatic plants have not been producing oxygen since sunset. The IEPA determined that Higgins Creek is impaired for DO (TEPA Assessment, 2016). The established minimum for DO level is 5.0 parts per million (ppm) between March and July and 3.5 ppm between August and February. Results of the DO testing conducted from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. All of the test results met the minimum levels. ::� 10 1If age tap vi VII II,,,11 A IE OF Il II IN I" IP R SIP IE 7i YEAR 15 WATER QUAII I Y TlEs"nING IRIESIUII....'TS VIII VIII 111(l, iV' VIII' Pi 1)1° 3t 26112 IS 201.3 201.4 2015 N 201.61 (IUP 201..7 201.61 1.9.0 1. °61 N 1.7.0 1.6.0 1.5.0 Minimum 1. °0 5.0 ppm Mar-Jul ri o 1.3.61 r 1.2.f1 co °�° o O1n �n C, m ci a: 1.1..f:1, o m 10.Cl� � ." �"� �� ' o ° ,M . n � 9.d "4�m oa a o �d,o °� o �� d W, � WW N OJ l Yh & � CY) WmD 7.1 ° : aM Ln 6.0 " . w. s... r x w a r w r 4.9 ho, M m d rr Em- s 3.61 ;� ° d c ...r. Minimum 2°C! .: J d d 1..0 3.5 ppm Aug-Feb a 0.0 9A ,,, r,�i, 0,,t Site 1.. Site 2 Siite 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6 Site i Site Silte Number Total dissolved solids (TDS) comprise of inorganic salts (principally calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, bicarbonates, chlorides and sulfates) and some small amounts of organic matter that are dissolved in water. While not a health hazard, elevated TDS levels decrease the aesthetic quality of water and can cause the water to become corrosive. Additionally, elevated TDS concentrations in water can cause a salty or brackish taste, interference and decreased efficiency of hot water heaters and lime-scale formation. Elevated TDS concentrations indicate elevated levels of ions that are above the Primary or Secondary Drinking Water Standards. None of the receiving waters within the Village are designated as impaired for TDS. The established limit for TDS is 1000.0 mg/L. Results of the TDS testing conducted from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. None of the 2017 test results exceeded the 1000.0 mg/L threshold. ::� 11 1If age tap vi 1111„,11„, GE OF II O U IN I” IP IR O IP IE G"T YEAR 15 WATER QUAII„,.1ITY T1E, '1C"11 NO IRIES U 11,,,,'T 1 0 T VIII VIII VIII S S LV E III S 0 1VIII S i° VIII° W 201.2 10 201.3 201.4 2015 N 201.6 (Irak 201..7 2500.0 0 ti ry ry Maximum 1000.0 ppm 2000.0 0 0 Ln ®o �0 00 0 0 0 Ln '!CL Ln 1. G7C7.f1 r =m m n r o 00 uiLn 00 rq �,,,;, N ' ®^ o o� ® ! r�ai 1.000.n —U .��- - - U o o rn rn rn lGY N i 00 h ®GO CD o 1D �P t o o mo 00 � � ;... N N*Y / Ol LnQ7 00 Ln LI'i tl m.,., fi r r r 40 VT ,x r ✓ r ”, a a 0.0 %RN �,hr r.,,,>,,,, �n,, tip ,,,,,,,,.," �, ,l c,>,,,,,, r„„„i s,„1 Site 1 Site 2 Site.1 Site 4 Sites Site 6 Site.7 Site 8 Site IMuirnbeir au° d uctMi ty Conductivity is the measure of water's ability to carry an electrical current. Conductivity in waterbodies is affected by the presence of inorganic dissolved solids such as chloride, nitrate, sulfate, sodium, magnesium, calcium, iron, and aluminum cations (ions that carry a positive charge). Organic compounds like oil, phenol, alcohol, and sugar do not conduct electrical current very well and therefore have a low conductivity level in water. Conductivity is also affected by temperature: the warmer the water, the higher the conductivity. Discharges to streams can change the conductivity depending on their composition. For example, a failing sewage system would raise conductivity due to the presence of chloride, phosphate, and nitrate, while an oil spill would lower conductivity. None of the receiving waters within the Village are designated as impaired for conductivity. The established range for conductivity is 50-1500 ps/cm. Results of the conductivity testing from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. In 2017, none of the test locations exceeded the 1500.0 ps/cm threshold. ::� 12 1If age 4( V1111 II,,,,AGE OF II IN"I" PIR SIP IE 't' YEAR 15 WATER QUAII,,,.IITY TlEs"nNG RIESIUII,,,,'TS Z 201.2 10 201.3 201../4. 2015 N 201.6 (Irak 201..7 3500.0 d d M 3000.0 [: Maxi mum 2500. 1500.0 µs/cm CDCD CDNm 7000.0 o n .r� � 0 Ln M Ln Ln 15MO JL � sN O 1 M a c-I �1dr� ,O . ..� dwi 1.000.0 N EE 0 .„ Ln W d' ,. W M cr m v r` Lr) 00 L-n Ln 00 Ln kD 40 500.0 m =UEEm iu l v r f-nr i CDfJ "!,„,,,,, d� �ra ,,,;, , i i�r� fair„ ,�: r»rm9„ i�r,,, r E"», s ;,,, „ ,,nr ra,r,✓ , yh ,7rr�r , , 7r,>v: ” Site 1 Site 7 Site.1 Site 4 Sites Site 6 Site.7 Site 8 Site Number r u,u°°blId li ty Turbidity is the measure of the relative clarity of a liquid. Material that causes water to be turbid includes clay, silt, finely divided inorganic and organic matter, algae, soluble colored organic compounds, and other microscopic organisms. High concentrations of particulate matter affects light penetration and productivity, recreational values, and habitat quality. In streams, increased sedimentation and siltation can occur, which can result in harm to habitat areas for fish and other aquatic life. Particles also provide attachment places for other pollutants (e.g. metals and bacteria). For this reason, turbidity readings can be used as an indicator of potential pollution in a water body. None of the receiving waters within the Village are designated as impaired for turbidity. While there is no water quality standard in Illinois for turbidity, other states have ambient water quality standards ranging from 10 NTU to 50 NTU, depending on the water body. Therefore, a value of 50 NTU is established for turbidity in this analysis. Turbidity testing began in 2016 to meet the monitoring requirements of the 2016 NPDES ILR40 permit. Results of the turbidity testing conducted from 2016 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. In 2017, six of the locations exceeded the 50 NTU threshold. ::� 13 1If age 4( VIIII,,,,II,,,,AGE OF II Q INI" IPI SIPIEC"T' YEAR 15 WATER QUAII,,,.II Y TlEsruNG IESIUII,,,,'TS R 201.61,201.7 1.50.00 1.40.00 1.30.00 v 1.20.00 1.0)0.00 m 90.00 Mmvmmmvmmmvmm 80'00CDMaximum 50 NTU NJ 70"00 LLn ri u 60MLn 0 Ln o00LnN 50"00 vtim f— — — — — — �M� — — — — w of 40.070 N ogo imm rn m 30.00 � im `� ...'. im 20.170ffm im im 1.0.00 im go 0.00 r „ 0 Site I Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Sites Site 6 Site.7 Site 8 Site II II��II II Most discharge flow types are neutral, having a pH value of approximately 7.0, (although groundwater concentrations can be somewhat variable). pH is a reasonably good indicator for liquid wastes from industries, which can have very high or low pH (ranging from 3.0 to 12.0). The pH of residential wash water tends to be basic (pH of 8.0 or 9.0). Although pH data is often not conclusive by itself, it can identify problem areas that merit follow-up investigations using more effective indicators. None of the receiving waters within the Village are designated as impaired for pH. The established range for pH is 6.5-9.0 (General Use WQS). pH readings from 2012 through 2017 are provided in the graph below. All results have been within the established range. F:1 age 4 1If age 4( V1111 11 AGE OF 11 0 NI" IPROSIPIEC'f' YEAR 15 WATER QUAII,,,.1ITY T11,",5ruNO 1RIESlU11 TS °lulu 1...1 tot 201.1..2 Y1 2011.3 %i 2 0 14 201..5 11,2016 rA 201.7 12.0:1 11.0 Maximum 9.0 101.07 Ln 00 00 9.07 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® � �LnLn N® wm 'qr00rw� ��Ooiaa� �I��h �ran�°i� ��^�� n �O0";�� .Q titin J� n�n� n �� n�nn r n �ti r u hr d+l r+'7t a .. rr� z .„ r �x +r ,,, Ni 7.C'1 �� 8 :. .. h r r d ertr £ r f r aka Ytl r® dmr ®w a1Wu r - ANPa Y aAAd �! II.. ® ° u r,1 � n.. ,e ER s d s r r;' Minimum 6.5 /6.0 Nili En ti e� 3.6 : .,.' .. ° L, I �ES .: WX IN C7 a71s r .. rru 'r° r. 1.Q X .,... im .. :.r�1rj r Site 1.. Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 zine 5 Site 6 Site.7 Site 8 Sine N uFnber IIII Sunruinnav'°M 11' 1611'.oinalld Creek Samples #1, #2, and 43 are from the west branch, north branch, and outflow into the Des Plaines River of McDonald Creek, respectively. Total suspended solids increased significantly from 2016 to 2017. The turbidity readings reflected this increase as well. This could be from the different intensities of each rain event, increased erosion in the watershed, or any development/construction occurring. The other significant difference was between the fecal coliform readings; much higher in 2017 than they were in 2016. This is most likely due to the water temperatures being about 20 degrees colder in November of 2016 than they were in October of 2017. The dissolved oxygen levels were thus higher in 2016 because cold water is able to retain higher oxygen concentrations than warmer water is. Feellhaurm lii1111le IIG; tc1tiii Sample #4 is from Feehanville Ditch, which eventually flows into the Des Plaines River. Significant differences between 2016 and 2017 were in chloride, fecal coliform, conductivity, and turbidity. Chloride decreased slightly in 2017 and thus conductivity was half of what it was in 2016. This could be due to less salt being used on roads during the recent mild winter and increased rainfall in the watershed flushing out naturally occurring salts as well. The turbidity went ::� 15 1If age 4( IIII,,,,II,,,,AGE OF II IN"I" PR SPIEC'f' YEAR 15 WATER QUAII,,,.IITY TlEs"nING IPIESIUII,,,,'TS from 11.76 in 2016 up to 31.81 in 2017. This may be due to rain intensity or increased erosion in the watershed. Fecal coliform counts were significantly higher as well most likely due to warmer water temperatures. Weller Creek Samples #5 and #6 are from Weller Creek where it begins in and then leaves the city limits. Significant differences between 2016 and 2017 were seen in total phosphorus, chloride, fecal coliform, conductivity, and total dissolved solids. Phosphorus decreased slightly since 2016 possibly due to less fertilizers being used overall or increased rainfall flushing nutrients out of the watershed. Chloride decreased as well and the closely related parameters of conductivity and total dissolved solids decreased significantly as well. Again, this is probably due to less salt being used on roads during the mild winter. Fecal coliform also increased significantly at these sample sites because of warmer water temperatures. II°I llliiggliiinS Cureelk. Samples #7 and #8 are from Higgins Creek where it flows into Briarwood Lake and then under Terminal Dr east of Badger Rd. The same parameters that had significant differences in samples #5 and #6 were also higher in 2017 for samples#7 and #8. The only additional increase was seen in total suspended solids. This could be higher in Higgins Creek due to the increased runoff from the industrial area that it flows through. ::� 16 1If age 4( II II,,,,II,,,,AGE OF IINT' IPI IP IE,C" Appendix 1 Location Map �i rr I „ r/l ✓� � - � �� I ur r �/ If/�//��i/L J%/iii i�rp//�l//irUi» „o of 1��„ ;,,/,7r •„urii,r o,r:- ..,.. / /r /,,L.r ,�lll/r,�//�l/r ; ✓, r�/ v,, i /lar„� /,/ li l/,�//i /�� i� , E.�11rr/� � �, , , � ,, /l/ 1 ;�o//i%%��L�i��j,�/ r cr '�✓�/,r/,L%rl�r � / �/�f Me ;, ;, ,- 1i1�%✓.,�rr/� /G r„ ! l i I////�r/r r'//i i�i%�/ 4'. r � ,;,, �rr%lr;,�. rOr/r r/, r/ l�o.r��/a�r,., /ri/r//,, ///,/ ✓�.:: /�/ /�J ;r, , �� ✓f r�t ,io r�i rl/L,�I1 ,cl�/�il�r�/„✓��l�i Je!,,,,�,/raar rr'p/, / �.%�.. - 1/!ri” �r,r„J% ,/%r.. i/r,:�./,r!Lri/i%, �i-✓-�. u�i/�,�f//f/,ir �� >/�. /r 11�/r'i ll�,: %' r�//, ;%rl/i e/✓i��ILI�L;f� r f ///n/ % %�/a, ',,�// ��r�;/�jJJ,!j///�/�l 6 -o r /�; � ��n�rrr/G,l rri Ir /% ;� r/l��y o✓�Ir;�� %//f r 9/�///'��////i x r,, f%2;-, / /�ro rel,/aG✓��„%,//i�Ir�f/l” l/„ ��,/ ;r��r��/r r /ri�I�1, itJir 1 % 1r� J l r D 0 i/” lA /i r ri fl1Y` r dro r� Ir, r a S Legend J ` r Mount Prospect Village Boundary 0 y � Waterways o ; rr Y r� Water_Quality—Testing_Locations $I ' 303d Lakes 2016 0 303d_Streams 2016 a` C , O NORTH WATER QUALITY TESTING LOCATIONS HanhardllNot to Scale VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT C W� N IOu IIID I C O 900 Woodlands Parkway,Vernon Hills, Illinois 60061 ph: 847-634-5550 manhard.com Date: 06/12/2017 Proj:000.OMPMP2.02 J MANHARD CONSULTING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 4( II II,,,,II,,,,AGE OF IINT' IPI IP IE,C" Appendix 2 Lab Report A Nk AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS Poll A, PJ A C"'i E t,,l E 11,41 "TP.O. lBox 82 Golly', 11L. 60029-0082 Phoinw: 847-579-3090 Fax: 847-724-8212 Mount Prospect Sample Locations Date: 11/2912016 Total Total Total Chloride Fats/Oils/ Fecal Coliform Suspended Nitrogen Phosphorous mg/I Grease mg/I Colonies/100 ml Solids mg/I mg/I mg/I Mount Prospect#1 9.60 1.06 0.08 246.00 <3.5 490 Mount Prospect#2 8.00 1.01 0.11 91.10 <3.5 880 Mount Prospect#3 12.30 0.93 0.11 104.00 <3.5 1,200 Mount Prospect#4 3.20 0.86 0.07 145.00 <3.5 460 Mount Prospect#5 11.40 1.41 0.14 127.00 <3.5 3,800 Mount Prospect#6 8.00 1.24 0.11 84.90 <3.5 1,100 Mount Prospect#7 11.30 0.68 0.078 141.00 <3.5 960 Mount Prospect#8 14.40 0.68 0.056 133.00 <3.5 540 Mount Prospect Sample Locations Date: 10/11/2017 Total Total Total Chloride Fats/Oils/ Fecal Coliform Suspended Nitrogen Phosphorous mg/I Grease mg/I Colonies/100 ml Solids mg/I rng/I mg/I Mount Prospect#1 50.70 <5 0.08 206.00 <5 5,800 Mount Prospect#2 101.00 <5 0.06 57.50 <5 3,900 Mount Prospect#3 138.00 <5 0.18 75.20 <5 7,200 Mount Prospect#4 13.00 <5 0.04 67.90 <5 9,200 Mount Prospect#5 18.70 <5 0.07 48.00 <5 8,400 Mount Prospect#6 12.80 <5 0.06 37.80 <5 4,200 Mount Prospect#7 16.00 <5 0.041 88.80 <5 5,400 Mount Prospect#8 31.40 <5 0.044 106.00 <5 8,000 2017 AQUATICS MANAGEMENT -WATER QUALITY REPORT City of Mt. Prospect, NPDES Report Page 3 11/20/2017 A Nk AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS Poll A, PJ A C"'i E t,,l E 11,41 "TP.O. lBox 82 Golly„ 11L. 60029-0082 lPlhoirwe:: 847-579-3090 Fax: 847-724-8212 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Mount Prospect Sample Locations Date: 11/29/2016 Water Dissolved DO % Total Conductivity Turbidity Temperature pH Oxygen Saturation mmhos/cm Dissolved (NTU) degrees F mg/I Solids mg/I mpi 45.26 8.04 10.16 86.7 1.082 692.6 17.89 M P 2 45.18 8.01 10.58 90.1 0.588 376.7 42.75 MP3 46.12 8.08 10.67 92 0.637 408.2 45.69 MP4 47.15 8.02 10.59 92.6 0.682 436.8 11.76 MP5 52.02 7.91 10.45 97.5 0.928 594.1 26.24 MP6 48.46 8.02 10.44 92.9 0.581 371.8 30.01 MP7 46.83 8.03 10.4 90.6 0.717 459.1 46.88 MP8 46.2 8.11 10.69 92.3 0.685 438.8 32.98 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ..................................................................................... ... Mount Prospect Sample Locations Date: 10/11/2017 Water Dissolved DO % Conductivity Total Turbidity Temperature pH Oxygen Saturation mmhos/cm Dissolved (NTU) degrees F mg/I Solids mg/I mpi 62.79 7.53 6.86 73.1 0.794 508.7 70.35 M P 2 62.56 7.66 6.63 70.3 0.377 241.8 90.46 MP3 62.29 7.62 7.14 75.5 0.411 263.2 121.6 IVIN 61.67 7.71 7.73 81.1 0.323 207.1 31.81 MP5 61.5 7.59 8.69 91 0.315 202.1 50.74 MP6 61.36 7.61 8.63 90.2 0.26 166.4 55.57 MP7 61.33 7.72 8.09 84.6 0.411 263.4 41.72 MP8 62.56 8.01 8.09 85.9 0.493 315.5 57.94 *Field Instrument: Eureka WaterProbe Manta 35 Samples were collected at 1' depth, if possible, otherwise 0.5'. 2017 AQUATICS MANAGEMENT -WATER QUALITY REPORT City of Mt. Prospect, NPDES Report Page 5 11/20/2017 A Nk AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS E4,41 A, P',J A C"'i E t,,l E 11,41 P.O. lBox 82 Gollf, IIIb,. 60029-0082 Rhoirw: 847-579-3090 Fax: 847-724-8212 AnalVtical Results Lake ounity Environmenit.411 Lalboraloq Sampte; 117,101140-0111 sampled: 1011111/17 09:15 Name: Mt Prospect#1 Recelivedi 11011,1117 13:50 Maitrix. Surfaice Water T1rpo!1 Grab Wlected ev-. lEric Mairtin Para' eLer Re."wit Unit RL Qu,4'10er Analyzed Analyk: Method chloride 2106 mg1 L 2.,517 IQf21ayQOU 14!18 is 19)7,21,5t lEd 1 51(1 1142717 I 4 n�o 171 15:()S RK01 Coliformi 00 UU11DO1,.1109TCS SM-9222-D-Rew 21306,22nd Ed n1l Oil&Crease(HEM) <S,Do mgjL 5.0e5 10(16aol) 0'9.010 AH A, 194�9 Phospharmy Totai (as P) 0.000, rng1L (100 1'0/212017 10:112 A,H SM-4500P-15"Rew 199151,21APA ResbdVO4 CUarime'Total <0.01010 mg[L 0.111100 10/11P,D1'7 09:15 FD SM-45x19 1-C-Rev 2000,21st lEd Tomperatuire 62.79 F 11,00 1011V2017 139:15 F101 5M-21550-B-Rev 20001,21st Ed Totd1l:INItrogFq(as N) <5.010 nig& 5-00 0,(12P2,017 VAO A,H 5hiniaojxI TH IResidlue,lNon-filterabie(TSS), 50.7 mgL 1.30 1„j:,::i(1 sc SK,2540,n-Rew 1997,Z10 Fil Sample: 17JO140-02 Sairnpledl: 1011I117 10,9:310 Name: Mt Prospect#2' Received: 10111117 13:50 Matrtx; Surface Water Type: G ra b Collected ley: Eric Martin IRP&Ot U rig RIL QuJakfilpr AraVyzed Ariallest Method ............ Chloride 92'®' mg/L 2.50 1,012512017 11,16 15, SK-115060-D-Rev 1997,21st IEd1 Ff-wall Cafiforrvi 39100 UU1100 1.0110 10111/2017 15:,05 TC5 591-92'22-0-Rev 2006,22nd Ed w rnl Oil&Grew"Se(HEM) e5„100 niqIL 5,00 10116/2017 09,00 41H EPA-1664-Rev A, 1999, Phosphorus,Total (as,F) 0,010 10120/2,017 10,A9 "kill 5r1-4450DP-iE-Rev 1,9991,21st Ed Residua;Chl4xtne,Total <GA100 mg& 0,0111)0 1011112017 0,":30 FO 20$)0,2151 Ed Temperature 62.1% F 0.00 10111ar2017 1119::10 FO 51M-2550-9-Rev 2900, 219t Ed Total Wropq(as 14) <5.00 vul11115.00 10;12,f201r7 1'8:J'S AH 1n,ktrna1-Shiimad.zuTN Resfilue,Non-fikerablie MS) 1011 mgxl. 11,301 40/16MI? 11;0'0 SC 51`4,254(1-,0Rear 0,117,21st Ed 2017 AQUATICS MANAGEMENT -WATER QUALITY REPORT City of Mt. Prospect, NPDES Report Page 8 11/20/2017 A Nk AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS tll A, l",J A C"'i E I14 E 11,41 "TP.O. lBox 82 Golly„ 111L. 60029-0082 1131hoirw: 847-579-3090 Fax: 847-724-8212 Anaillytical Restliks (Continued) Lake County Environmental Laboratory Sample; 17,1011401-�3 Sampled: 10/11117'X9:41 Name: Mt Prospect#3 Receivel 10111117 13'50 Matrix: Surface Wateir Type: Grab callected By: Eric.,Marfin Result Unt Rl. Owl6eir odn�yeed Aa,flpt HLAhod Chloride anol- 4,10 10125,Q017 14:18 11.1 1,1`4.450001-D-Rev 1997,zto lEd Feca,l CgIlifDrm 7200 U1.l1100 1.00 1011101017 151105 TC5 S11-9222-0-llev 2006,, 22nd Ed ml Oill&Giease(1-iEM) <5.00 Mq/L 5.00 10)'1612,017 D,:00 All EPA-t 1564,-Redos,1999 Phosphorus,Totaill (as P) 0.1,84 FrIg/l. C."Oto 10/2012017 ID:49 'AH Sl44X1(W-E-Rev 1,999,21st Ed l ChloriinkM,Total +0.01013: rnVL 0' 1010 1011),140 09;'16 `0 2()u1j,21sr.Ed Temperalture 62,29 F 0.00 0)1.112:017 D9:45 FQ SM-255D-13-Rev 20DR,21st Ed Total NKFogen(as 1114 <5,00 mt#l, 5.00 wt12,70:7 19:02 All Ink vnaN-5hkni3dzuTN ResidAme,Mcm-Fitterable(TSS)l 3.38 Mq'�L 11130 10)1812GI7 11.11110 Sc SK-2 4D-1D-Rev 1997,21st Ed Sample: 1710140-04 Sampled: 110MI/17109:57 Name., Mt Prospect#4 Receivedl, 1101117 13,50, Mistrix; Suirface Water Type: rab Collected lay, Erie Nlariiin, Result lJoit Rl. Qualifier Anallyzed Ajnm4yst 14ethod 67.9, niqVIL 2.50 100$1207 !,4:M )s SM-4�i0f.)04>-Rev 1"7,21st Ed Fecal Collforni 912010 CFUJJ,00LOU 1w1.112W 15:0 TCS SK-9222-ID-Rove NO,411d E'd u,ni 11tH4 area se(HEM) <5,00 "HOL 5100 10/1612017 09!0l), AH EPA-1664 Red A,191Y) Phosphorus,Twtall (as P) 0.035 rngl. rtWla 10120/2017 1R):19 AS 91454300,E-Kv 1999,21st E11 Residual Chlorine,Total C0.10100 mgr°L 10-0100 1011112017 09:57 VG SIM-,WOO-C-Rev 20,00,21st F'd "remparature 61.67 F (1A)0 1W I 1=17 09!57 `0 SM-45D-e-Il4v 2000,21st Ed Totail N4f o gvn(as l <5,00 FUyL 5.00, 10117,12017 19:12 0 Internal-SKumadaffN R,esilduler Non-fflterable(T55) 1341 nig/L 1 3,0, 10/1612017 11:00 SC SN1,2540-D-Rev 1997,21,51'Fed 2017 AQUATICS MANAGEMENT —WATER QUALITY REPORT City of Mt. Prospect, NPDES Report Page 9 11/20/2017 A Nk AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS P41 A, PJ A C"'i E t,,l E 11,41 P.O. lBox 82 Gollf, IIIb,. 60029-0082 Phorw: 847-579-3090 Fax: 847-724-8212 Analytical Rill (Continued) Laike Cou nty Environ mienta I La beiratory Sample: 17J10140-05 samplelik, M11117 1102) Name., Mt Prospect#5 Received: 10111/17 113-150 Matflx: urface Waiter Typc Grab Callillected By,; lEric Ma6n Resoll: 1lrriit k1, Q UaWeiir ArOyzed Analysi rtwCrSad Chloridle 48.0 rrig/li. 1"1:111 is $11-4500iQl-f1-Rev 1997,21st Ed Fecall Cofiform 8,4010: CIFLY100 1100 13,x11/201? MCjs TCS 51+9222!,0Nw 21)05,22nd Ed, rind Oil K Sivase(HEM) <5.00 inqjL 5,00 13J1,6/2017 i AH A,19199 Phospborus,Total (as P) 0.016S r11911, 010111 113Q4a1241P H'49 AH 1999,21 lEd, ReisidwA Clikvilre,717itArl <D.01100 M9111„, 1010110 IW11121017 10l;7O FD SM-4 5019ck341'eq 7R'10'21.411°'[,{ Temperature 61.50 F 0100 10J1,112017 1D.,20 FO 5N-2550-B-'11ev 210100,21st Ed Trtall Nitrogen(as N) <5.00 irriqlL 5,100 143112/2017 M23 AH Rai Non-Filterabile(TSS) 28.7 mg/IL 1.30 10,9111P 017 1):,:X) 1997,21st Ed Sample: I 7J0 140-016, Sari 110111111117 1036 Name; Mt Prospect#6 Fteceive* 1:10/1111117 1350 matdw Surface Water Typet Grab colillected i EOc Mairfiri pe_Ult uplit RIL Qw,00pir Analyzed Ainaiiyst NetY'Dd .......... Chloride 37.8 nC1111 7.50 10d252200 14 1;11 is 514,45005-114ev VI11)7,2 10 Ed Fecal!Call1arm 4200: CFU/100 1,100 10/1112017 15'.05 10, 5M-9)222-D-1Rffv 2006,2?,;'id Ed r(d 100&Greaw(ITEM) <5'00 M911. 5,00 1011612017 1191,00 AH EP11-11564-11iev A,, 1999 PhospholruTotal (as P) 0.061 MID/1”, D,Duo 10/2012017 1149 'Ahl SM-4150OP-E-Rev 119199,2151'.NJ RtsWual 0donne,Total <13.0100 MqjL O'D1100 1011112017 10:36 rio 2000,21st Ed Temperature &L36 F 0.00 10A1221317 110315 1`0 SM-2550-8-Rev 2000,21st,Ed TfjW Nitrogen(as 14), X5,00 i 4.911 0 10/1212017 19.37 AH Integrial-Shimarizi,iTiN Residlue,Nian-Filliterable(TM) 12.3 1 L30 10/1,812017 ILM SIC SMQW-D,kav 19917,21st Ed 2017 AQUATICS MANAGEMENT —WATER QUALITY REPORT City of Mt. Prospect, NPDES Report Page 10 11/20/2017 A Nk AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS P41 A, PJ A C"'i E E 11,41 P.O. lBox 82 Gollf, 11L. 60029-0082 Phoinw: 847-579-3090 Fax: 847-724-8212 Analytical Results (Contiinvw) Lake Counity Environmental Laboratory Sample; 17J0140-07 Sampled; 10,11417 10:57 Name: MI Prospect#7 Received: 10 1 11417 13:50 Matrix: urfacp Water Type: Grab CoAllected By. Eric.Mairfin USA Unit' K, Qoldffpv Analyzk Mallyst me"I'hob Markle go's mgj' 2,50 147,+25/2,017 14,18 Js SM-150CCI-D-Rev I Ed Fecal Ca lifform SUD MW 100 1100 WOV2017 15:0WIC S SM-92n-D-Rey 2006,22,rid Ed M� 0111 ,Grease(HEMp <5.00 nig/L 5,00 IOJ24J'2017 09,40 EW EPA-I V54-Rew A 19,99 Phosphorus,Total (ars P) 0.0141 nig/1 0.01T 10J211f2017 I0A9 AH SM-4500P-E-RLv 1999,�Jq�'d Rtmid%jal Chlor1r)8,,TOVA <01,01100 nig/L 0,x1100 10/11J2017 111',57 F0 20,100,21,t Ed TeMpefatUre 10�33 F 0100 10t1i2j01,7 11y:,57 FO 2000,21s1 Ed ToW Nitrogen(,as N) <5,.00 rnL 5.00 101124.2017 19"50 AH Residue,Noin-Fifterable(TSS) 16.0 mgj' I17P'I'00'317 ILOO SC 552540-D-Rev 1,997,2 Ist Ed sample: 17JO11401-,08 Sampifedi 10,111117 11:101 Nam,e. Mt.Prospect#B Received: 10,1111x17 13:50 Mlatrix; Surface Water Type: Grab Collected av�: Eric Marltin Resdit Jinit IRIL Quallifies Analy2ed A011t tlek ,1ySho� P,Erl-It.. Chloride LOS rrg)L 2.50 LW2542OV 14:18 is SM-450KI-D-RO 1957"21'sl Ed Fecal CoMoTot 0000, CFUr100 1.00 10/110011 151051 TC 5 SM-1942-D-RLv 2006,22ndEd IrM Oil&Greaw(lI'R) 00 m011 5.ac 10124 2017 09AD E1w EPA,-16&1-Rev A,19,99 Phosphorus,ToW (as 1P) 4.044 P"WL 0.0110 1149 Al°N 5H-45001:1-1E4ev 1999,21,,t Ed Re§dual Chlorkie,Total <0.01w mrjl)ll,. DR100 10IIIR017 1,1110 FO SM-45000-G-Rev 2000,21st Ed Tw"Voratore 62.56 f 10M 10j11/2Q17 11,10 FO &M-2550-8-Rev 2000,, 21,,t Ed, TrA.-M NitrDgen(as IN� <5.00 rrgXL 5.W WjOf201? M03 Al I I nt v na I-Sh iin"i ad7r uTN Residue,Non-Filterable(T$S) 31.4 mg/IL 1.10 IOAV2017 11:OD st SM-2540-/"-Rev 1,9'74 Ed 2017 AQUATICS MANAGEMENT —WATER QUALITY REPORT City of Mt. Prospect, NPDES Report Page 11 11/20/2017 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL INSPECTION REPORT Inspection Information Inspection Date: Time: Facility ID#: Date of Last Inspection: Type of Inspection:[]Routine []Follow-Up ❑Complaint Facility Type:❑Auto []Retail Gas ❑Industrial ❑Commercial Facility Name: Inspector: On-Site Facility Representative: Title: Phone: Email: Weather at the time of inspection: ❑Raining ❑Sunny ❑Cloudy []Windy ❑ Calm Precipitation in last 24 hours? ❑Yes ❑No If yes,how much(inches)? Facility Records Reviewed On-Site: ❑NPDES Permit ❑SWPPP ❑Other: Property Information Facility Site Address: Facility Description/Potential Sources of Pollution: NAICS Code: NPDES ILR00 Permit Required: [:]Yes ❑No If yes,ILR00 Permit No.: Date Issued: Expiration Date: Inspection Results Illegal Connection/Illicit Discharge Suspected?[]Yes[:]No If yes,basis:❑Dry Weather Flow ❑Odor ❑Solids ❑Sheen []Other: Source of Discharge Visually Identified: ❑Yes ❑ No If yes,describe source: Are storm drains functioning? ❑Yes ❑ No If no,explain: Are materials being stored outside? ❑Yes E]No Description of Materials: Are outside storage areas adequately covered? []Yes ❑No If no,explain: Are there signs of leaks from vehicles/equipment:❑Yes❑No Are there above or below ground storage tanks on site?[]Yes ❑No If yes,identify the type of material in tanks: Is there a secondary containment system?:❑Yes❑No Type: Are sediments&wastes being prevented from tracking off-site? ❑Yes ❑ No If no,explain: Do dumpsters have closed lids or other protection from rainfall? ❑Yes ❑No Is there liquid or solid waste on the ground around the dumpsters? ❑Yes ❑No Compliance THIS SITE IS IN COMPLIANCE? ❑Yes ❑No CORRECTIVE ACTIONS MUST BE COMPLETED BY: Follow Up Required: [:]Notice of Violation ❑Follow-Up Inspection ❑None Corrective Actions Needed: Additional Information Requested: Field Notes: Village of Mount Prospect,Public Works Department 1700 W Central Road,Mount Prospect,IL 60056 Inspection Report Received By: Inspector: Print Name: Inspector Signature: Signature: Inspector Telephone: Print Title: . . g( of Ma ril Puir o sp e c Professional Services/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Compliance _.... .......................... . ...... ..................................... Mountlsrospec t w��AO➢1U11U BAXTE �J W00DMA►N �1�11h1f�f/� S'u.bm to Baxter & Woodman, Inc. Consulting Engin(��ers waw bater—w ('.)odmunmcom 84,30 Bryn Mawr Ave., Suil e 400 Chicago, 11, 60631 815 4,59.12 6 0 Project, Manager 111m°e wruw r1 , 2011 nl`timn�orilrill4 BAXTE `u11 }11��11100DMAN �� < Hirrr Fnglirwni[: February 21, 2018 Jason Lieb Deputy Director of Public Works Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Rd. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Subject:Proposal for Professional Services/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Compliance Dear Mr. Lieb: The Village of Mount Prospect seeks a qualified Consultant to provide professional services to demonstrate compliance with ILR40 requirements as well as the Village's Stormwater Management Plan. Baxter & Woodman is the ideal candidate to assist the Village with a cost effective approach to address permit requirements. Our approach for the Village's MS4 services focuses on: • Unmatched MS4 Expertise- Baxter&Woodman assists over 30 communities in Illinois implement their MS4 program. Our team performs the exact work described in this request for Elgin, Glenview, and Lake Bluff,IL,and performs inspection,sampling,and/or MS4 training for multiple communities through the local region.Our direct experience,lessons learned,and unmatched technical expertise means your project will be served by a team with proven success. • Utilizing Existing Resources - Numerous communities have relied on Baxter &Woodman to help them implement their NPDES MS4 permit including Elgin, Joliet, Hanover Park, Downers Grove, Skokie, and many more. From our experience, we've developed training materials and streamlined processes to tasks complete quickly and efficiently-saving the Village time and money. • Continued Service-Baxter&Woodman is familiar with the Village's staff,policies,and procedures from our experience assisting with combined sewer rehabilitaton, transportation assistance, and GIS management.We want to continue serving the Village as your trusted advisor. If the Village has any questions,please feel free to contact Project Manager Dan Bounds at 815-444-3342 or dbounds@baxterwoodman.com. Sincerely, BAXTER&WOODMAN, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS Dan Bounds, PE Andy Zaletel, PE Project Manager Client Services Manager VILLAGEii�� ➢ ili�� '°I: Vl��lll�i.i:f5111��lllhm�::'"i° f � iii : uiru� eii. ic(M( �,, NatiotiumiVl[ Flollutaiiirnt ffiwf arg Syst nri (NI)DES) Cwrrao lllluiiaiiri.(-(� * 18,0228 1.0 CONTENTS Letter of Interest . ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .2 Baxter&Woodman, Inc. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .4 Project Approach and Scope . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .5 Project Experience... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .8 Present Work Load .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..12 ProjectTeam .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .13 Appendix A Resumes .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..16 N, s'�.rer�gt.[r of IRrcx»�er& b°l/»:ro»:`»vo r is ow j.-wop le or'O rar!rprpA �r:�rrrr, /o ir�g c�oivrri�ar ft y»rr»frt»r with every r<ryi project. Gn oP'.fM,�r�f�C��r: '1��"�I��rG�?Y('�V�r��P/f�rf�l r'��M?a""G.��'1a9� y"Jr'tNpC';Ppa»y5p v/G'3'hw?bJ:. . . Vflh o%000iooi�/ �, ,,; I�p�� yrwlNi��rruaoa ttirug u��»ul r�� UI ,1 u grrrOu»ir»G:Pirarspr.r.a' 180 '21rR BAXTEi " OODMAN at m'm�r mr 111 III'��Illllliuw orio III' m �,llhui��mu� �, Illuim�u°ui�urui�� iiim:r m is°io�II � III�„y ��:muru lly�ulllm�mm�;�:s �A ��m1, l"I'llIt, �,;�� I Jiiii� I J / f II BAXTER & WOODMAN, INC. Baxter & Woodman, Inc. provides engineering and consulting services to municipal, county, and state government agencies -we have since 1946. Our team offers expert services that stretch well- beyond typical engineering consulting. Baxter & Woodman is a privately held, employee-owned corporation.The company's success and integrity are determined by our employee shareholders. Our expertise... WATER WATER RESOURCES TRANSPORTATION Master Planning Master Planning& Modeling Pavement Management Reports Rate Studies Drainage Studies Intersection Design Studies Supply,Treatment, & Distribution Detention&Retention Basin Traffic Signal&Street Lighting Operations Storm Sewer Systems Streetscape Erosion Control Bicycle/Pedestrian Paths WASTEWATER Groundwater Monitoring&Studies MFT Programs Facilities Planning Lust Investigations Map-21 Study, Design& Sanitary Sewer Evaluation & Phase I & II Site Investigation Construction Rehabilitation Wetlands Delineation Bridge Engineering Conveyance&Treatment GENERAL MUNICIPAL Operations GIS Pretreatment Programs Asset Management Grant& Loan Funding Development/Training Plan Reviews TECHNOLOGY Mapping Comprehensive Land Use Plans Data Collection/Conversion Capital Improvement Plans SCADA/Controls Park/Recreational Development Municipal IT Land Surveying Security Public Relations J»»JJJJJ � JJJIJ0�l%/ //In 99112 J» JJJJ %%% O % l� 1J / /i// / / % % J; Project Manager Dan Bounds, PE, D.WRE 8678 Ridgefield Road Crystal Lake, IL 60012 Phone: 815-444-3342 Email: dbounds@baxterwoodman.com /�,W�IW�W�IIW�IIW�W�W�W�W�W�IIW�IIW�IIW�W�W�W�W�W�IIW�IIW�IIW�W�W�W�W�W�IIW�IIW�IIW�W�W�W�W�W�IIW�IIW�IIW�W�W�W�W�W�IIW�IIW�IIW�W�W�W�W�W�IIW�IIW�IIW�W�W�W�W�W�IIW�IIW�IIW�IW�W�W�IW�W�W�IW�I�w�W�IW�W�W�IW�W�IW�,�w�W�W�IW�W�W�IW�IW�I�w�IW�W�W�IW�W�W�IW�IIW�IIW�IIW�� ■rrrrr SUCCESSFULLY PRESENTED AT 10 TRAINED 1005 ASSISTED 30+ IL SUBMITTED 100+ CONFERENCES/ COMMUNITIES WITH WORKSHOPS ON MS4 MUNICIPAL STAFF TEPA APPLICATIONS IMPLEMENTATION ON MS4 PROGRAM MS4 SERVICES &ANNUAL REPORTS STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTATION e of Mount ospect* 228,1.0 ylpm��rmIIIII' IlllllwKorrlllmsll�umurgr. liliimirmurulmm:rvrm serucu IIPIIII BAXTEIf�I��OODMAN ry a:gIII11np9B ia�lValll�fl:;a'�. n;ultn f.ricyll Lr, J rI ar, Ilu((r�i��r�rrrrrrrrrrrr�rrr PROJECT APPROACH AND SCOPE The following services will be provided for the 2018 and 2019 calendar years,corresponding to the 2018-19 and 2019-20 MS4 permit implementation years. 1. OUTFALL INSPECTIONS A Health and Safety Plan (HSP) will be developed for dry weather stormwater outfall inspection, including safety equipment,safety procedures,and local emergency numbers and facilities.Training on the health and safety plan will be performed prior to beginning outfall inspection. A two person crew will be used to inspect outfalls for safety and efficiency of data collection. The Project Manager will initiate inspections with Project Engineers to direct inspection work and set expectations for completing remaining outfall inspections. The Village's existing Outfall Inspection Form will be completed for up to 120 outfalls, including taking photographs and documenting attribute data. Existing conditions will be documented, as well as observed erosion, slope stabilization, and/or other maintenance issues. Issues requiring immediate attention will be communicated to Village staff as soon as possible. Baxter & Woodman will produce an outfall inspection report, including a prioritization for re- inspection, necessary maintenance,and repairs. An alternative to using the Village's inspection form would be using Baxter&Woodman's Collector App software on field tablets. The Collector App is being used by other local communities to speed data collection and streamline data management and retrieval for maintenance purposes. If the Village is interested in learning more about the Collector App, our team can meet with staff to discuss the costs and benefits of using the App for your project. 2. WATER QUALITY TESTING A Health and Safety Plan (HSP) will be developed for water quality sampling and working near or over water, including safety equipment, safety procedures, and local emergency numbers and ......... ........ .._....a.. facilities. Training on the health and safety plan will be performed prior to beginning outfall inspections. A two-person crew will be used for sampling for safetyr,, and efficiency of sample collection. Baxter & Woodman will monitor weather conditions and coordinate with Village staff prior to rainfall events and sampling. Baxter&Woodman field sampling staff have established r� f protocols for weather monitoring and scheduling sampling events already in use for other communities. The Project Manager will initiate sampling procedures Proyect IEingin�eer II...'indrey ZveregI.allarlly . with Project Engineers to set expectations for completing assists with stOrrrlWateir testing Photo abover T ahomis I....iIndsey Ir er for rralrrg testing for the remaining sampling events. Village of 11 gin's NASA Pivogirarn, ospect 228,1.0 I p n�� mnII III IIIIII w K or rllC ms Il�u mur r.f I�liimusmurul nmmry m urru II � III BiAxTE /J'0,iffl00DMAN �,�:munrm.�allma'H,iiq:;�'�. 0 n;ultn Lricyii lr, J I Il ///�� ar, lll 11 Baxter & Woodman staff will collect grab samples from four locations to be confirmed with the Village, both upstream and downstream of the Village's stormwater runoff. Grab samples will be collected within 48 hours of a precipitation event greater than or equal to 0.25 inches in a 24- hour period. Precipitation depth will be determined using USGS rainfall data (gage 05530990 - Salt Creek at Rolling Meadows). Field analysis will be performed to collect pH, dissolved oxygen, and temperature data for the samples. Baxter &Woodman has existing working procedures with certified laboratories who will perform analysis for total suspended solids, total nitrogen, total phosphorous,fecal coliform, chlorides,and oil and grease.Baxter&Woodman understands that the Village will pay the lab fees directly; lab fees are not included in the cost estimate. We understand that the Village has been performing water quality sampling once per year for MS4 purposes;our approach and fee is based on performing this work once per year.While this frequency may meet permit requirements, IEPA has typically been recommending quarterly sampling to inform MS4 program implementation. Baxter &Woodman can meet with Village staff to discuss the costs and benefits of performing sampling quarterly. A summary report for water quality sampling will be produced, including recommendations for further testing,if necessary.Sampling results will be databased for trending and informing program implementation. 3. STAFF TRAINING Baxter & Woodman provides MS4 training to several local communities each year, and has developed training content for training requirements within the MS4 permit. The Project Manager will meet with Village staff to determine the training topics to be covered in 2018 and 2019, then will organize and deliver training Village staff. Any updates to MS4 implementation related to the selected topics will be updated in the presentation content prior to training. One in-house training event will be performed for Public Works Department employees about storm water management, potential sources of contaminants, best management practices (BMPs), and the Village's Storm Water Management Plan. Presentation slides, photographs, and other visuals will be used for training. There will be ample time for questions and discussion, especially on lessons learned. The goals will be to engage staff in conversation about the topics to reinforce the training content. The Village's protocols, documentation forms, and preferences will be incorporated into the training. Sign in sheets for documenting delivered training for annual reporting purposes will be provided. 4. INDUSTRIAL&COMMERCIAL INSPECTIONS The Project Manager and lead business inspection staff will review prior inspection protocols and results and assist Village staff with planning and prioritizing industrial and commercial inspections. Facilities or areas with known issues based on prior evaluations or water quality sampling will be prioritized. Further prioritization could then be based on type of business or drainage areas within the Village. Baxter&Woodman will work closely with Village staff on the inspection plan. I p n�� m II III' Ill 111 w K or r llC m llhu m ur r. Ill ii m it m ural n m:ry m uc a II 1III B A X T E /J'0,,M O O D M A N �,�:g111 .�B �a'�IIIfl:;�'�. 11k.11111111111 It, Lricy>> l r, J J rI ar, Ilu((r�(I�i��r�rrrrrrrrrrrr�rrr Up to 50 industrial and/or commercial properties will be inspected to look for illicit discharges and potential sources of storm water pollution, with progress updates during project meetings. The Village's one-page inspection form will be completed and photographs taken to document site conditions. The inspector will discuss the inspection results with the on-site property representative,if available. Baxter & Woodman has senior engineering technicians that have been performing MS4 business inspections and documentation,including contacting the business for scheduling.Baxter&Woodman understands that local business can be intimidated and concerned about inspections. Our staff has developed a good approach to first contact and scheduling inspections and take the time to explain the need for the inspection and any resulting issues in a non-confrontational manner. Urgent issues will be communicated to Village staff immediately. An inspection reportwill be written,summarizingthe inspections and anyfollowup action necessary for the Village.All inspection forms and pertinent photographs will be attached or included. S. MEETINGS Baxter&Woodman will meet with Village staff three times per year to present inspection findings and any inspection follow up necessary, go over water quality sampling results and any trends, review task progress and provide general MS4 program direction. I p n�� m II III' Ill 111 w K or r llC m ll�u m urg r. I�l ii m it m ural n m:ry m uc a II � III B A X T E /J'0,i ffl O O D M A N �,�:g111 .�B �a'�IIIfl:;�'�. 1"� 111111It� Lricy>> l r, J J / I �frr��lr�rrrrrrrrrrrr�rrr�rrrrrrl��r��r�r��r�r�rr��r��r�� PROJECT EXPERIENCE Baxter&Woodman has provided NPDES compliance services,specificallyMS4 permit implementation services, for over 30 local communities since the inception of IEPA's general MS4 permit. Our MS4 permit implementation services include: • MS4 program development and assessment • Staff and contractor training • Annual reporting and required regulatory • Public education materials and outreach submittals presentations • Stormwater quality management plan • Storm drain system mapping development • Stormwater outfall inspection,facility • Shared services coordination with other evaluation groups and agencies • Water quality monitoring • Best Management Practices (BMP) • Level of service development and budgeting development • Regulatory audit preparation and assistance Summary of Baxter&Woodman's MS4 Experience Annual Report, Program Public Outfall 2016/2017 Community NCI,Stormwater Review& Education& Inspection& Audit Management Plan Implementation Staff Training Monitoring Assistance Antioch X X X X Beecher X X X X X Downers X X X X Grove Elgin X X X X X Elmhurst. X .. X X .. Geneva F X X X X Hanover X X X X Park it Joliet X X X X X Lake Bluff I X X ....... ........ . Lisle x x x X New Lenox X X X Township Oakwood X X X X X Hills it Palatine X X X X Round Lake X Skokie X X X X South Elgin X X Wheeling X X X X Will County X X X X X ospect 228,1.0 I p n�� m II III' Illlll w K or rllC m ll�u mur r.I lllimir mural nm:ry m ucu II I III '"1 BAXTE J'0,,MOODMAN �:gIII11np9B �:AriII�fl:;�'�. 01 n;ultn Lricyii rr, J J I �frr��r�rrrrrrrrrrrr�rrr�rrrrrr��r��r�r��k�r�rr��r��r�� CITY OF ELGIN, IL NPDES PHASE II STORMWATER PERMIT COMPLIANCE 2014-2018 Baxter & Woodman developed a multi-year MS4 program for the City, providing assistance with program requirements in the City's MS4 permit. The project involves developing an Illicit IREFERENCE: Discharge Detection and Elimination Program for the City, good INora Bertram housekeeping procedures to prevent stormwater pollution from IEngineer II - Utilities municipal activities, a program to educate and involve the public 847-931-6744 about stormwater pollution prevention, commercial/industrial I Bertram_N@cityofelgin.org business inspections,and MS4 outfall screening and water quality sampling.The project also involves training City staff to implement o the programs and procedures. The City's program consists of the following elements: BAST m MVUUUMAN Illicit Discharge Detection&Elimination (IDDE) .......... • Updating the City's GIS-based storm sewer system map „vr, • Developing procedures for detecting and eliminating illegal discharges to the storm sewer systemmrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrIDmfl »mrmr • Performing dry-weather outfall inspections and Proec~t Manager Lean Eminds prrzvlides rhe Oty vur'fth collecting wet-weather samples for laboratory testing regu!Iar project:: s::atu s reports. We w H provIde the stay Village of Mount oI,jr�t Prospectt �Mth rnonthly pr€allE��ct updates a • Inspecting commercial and industrial facilities to help oij and � staff scu,irrenrt for compliance with their Stormwater Pollution lhiroItjghor jt ymir project and glive yoI,u the rapt.ort:runfty Prevention Plan to f rovPied ru:s vo/lith fer:rikrack, • IDDE Program Training Public Education&Outreach • Developing printed materials based on educational materials available from the USEPA and other sources,but customized for the City • Sponsoring classroom education available through the Kane-DuPage Soil and Water Conservation District • Presenting at public events,such as a seminar for HOAs on maintaining stormwater best management practices Public Involvement&Participation • Coordinating with stakeholder groups to hold stream clean-up events • Promoting resident reporting of illegal discharges to the drainage system Construction Site&Post-Construction Stormwater Management • Reviewing City ordinances for compliance with State regulations • Documenting the City's plan review,site inspection,and enforcement procedures Stormwater Pollution Prevention for Municipal Operations • Preparing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for City facilities, such as the Public Works Facility, Salt Storage Facilities,and City Parks • Documenting City's storm sewer system inspection and maintenance procedures ospect 228,1.0 I p nuurm II III' Illlll:w K or rllC ms Ilhu mar r.fr l�liimu mural nmmrvrm uru I r III r BiAxTE J'0?1MOODMAN �,�:g111 .�B �a'��IIIfl:;�'�. 01 n;ultn Lricyii r r, I i ni I IC r ! r/ ................................................................... VILLAGE OF GLENVIEW, IL NPDES PHASE II ASSISTANCE Since 2010, Baxter & Woodman has been providing the Village I REFERENCE: with NPDES Phase II MS4 Assistance. Every year, our team meets I Don Owen with staff from various Village departments for NPDES Phase II 1 Deputy Village Manager coordination meetings. 1 847-998-9500 dowen@glenview.il.us Internal educational sessions are an important component of the Village's program. Baxter &Woodman staff present educational programs to remind, inform, and encourage Village staff to prevent and reduce stormwater pollution from municipal operations and to document activities that prevent pollution. We conduct field training for Village staff on Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination procedures and inspection of storm sewer outfalls and detention basins. Other services provided by Baxter&Woodman: • Water Quality Monitoring - includes collection of wet weather samples and submittal for laboratory testing to determine concentrations of total suspended solids,total dissolved solids, total phosphorus, nitrate, ammonia, total kjeldahl nitrogen, fecal coliform, and chloride. Our staff also takes field measurements of flow rate,temperature, dissolved oxygen,and pH. • Annual Reports to the IEPA - this report describes the goals that were met during the past program year and the milestones that will be achieved in the next program year. • Notice of Intent-commitment by the Village to comply with the conditions of the General Permit. • Program Review - review status of Village's stormwater management plan with IEPA staff and discuss strategies with Village to address feedback. Prepare a Stormwater Management Plan summarizing the pollution 7 1 prevention practices that form the Village's stormwater management program. Update and expand the1�� li i' Stormwater Pollution Prevention x °iia i Plan for the Public Works Facility. f i it -07 . S s � OII 1 . 4411"4 i JJ r - �4torm System Dizqneter(in 0-4 8 .{a --------5-1 e 19 36 0 .o0 00 , s +'ion=ezoo moc Exarrrpllra of GIS rrralp prepared by Baxter&Woodir,r;an of varlious Village INVF'C::11ES IPhase II outfall locations, ge Ipnaamalllll' 111111:wKsorrllCmsllhumurg . Igliimirrmurulnm:rvmrucru II1III "°�t BAXTE, »alf�l��OODMAN 01 n;ultn Lricyii r r, r t/ r .......................................................................................... VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF, IL NPDES PHASE II ASSISTANCE Since 2014,Baxter&Woodman provided assistance with the Village's REFERENCE: NPDES Phase II MS4 stormwater management program. Jeffrey Hansen Village Engineer Services provided include: 1 847-283-6884 • MS4 Program Review-Baxter&Woodman conducted a review jhansen@lakebluff.org of the Village's MS4 program and documentation including the new MS4 permit, the Village's NOI documentation, annual reports,and audit information. • Annual Report Preparation-Our team works with Village staff to prepare two annual reports to be submitted to the IEPA. • Water Quality Monitoring - Includes collection of wet weather samples and submittal for laboratory testing to determine concentrations of total suspended solids,total dissolved solids, total phosphorus, nitrate, ammonia, total kjeldahl nitrogen, fecal coliform, and chloride. Our staff also takes field measurements of flow rate,temperature, dissolved oxygen,and pH. • MS4 Staff Training- Baxter&Woodman provides educational presentations to remind,inform and encourage Village personnel to prevent and reduce stormwater pollution from municipal operations and to document activities that prevent pollution. Ipm�� mIIIII' Illlll:wKorrllCmIlhumurm, I�liimirmurumm:rvmrucu IIE� III '"j BAXTEif�l��OODMAN ry �,�:g111 .�B �a'��IIIfl:;�'�. 0 n;u�tn J / / I J �frrlllfflll��i��r��f��l PRESENT WORK LOAD Baxter &Woodman is committed to serving our clients, and we carefully monitor the current and projected workload for each of our employees.We understand the importance of being responsive to our clients'needs,and we always consider the impact an awarded project will have on the workload of our staff. Baxter & Woodman completes over 2,000 projects per year firm-wide ranging from preliminary planning through the substantial completion phases, with fees ranging from less than $1,000 upward into the millions. Staff members for your NPDES Compliance Project are currently concluding activities on major projects. Based on both current and projected project workloads, our staff will have adequate time and the necessary resources available to serve the Village of Mount Prospect.We are confident that with our resources, experience, and manpower we will provide you with successful, efficient, and cost-effective engineering services. AVAILABILITY OF KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL Note:"The last column shall reflect the actual percentage of time to be spent on the proposed project,i.e.,20 percent is 20% Percent of Percent of Proposed Time on Date Time to be Name Position Current Projects Current Projects Devoted to this Projects Completed Item/Proposed Position Dan Bounds, PE, Project Elgin NPDES MS4 10 11/30/2018 15 D.WRE Manager Program Implementation Baxter&Woodman, Inc. Municipal MS4 Programs—Multiple 50 12/31/2018 Communities Drainage Studies and Stormwater Master Plans—Multiple 25 12/31/2018 Communities Corey Van Dyk, EIT, Project Lake Forest Drainage 15 3/1/18 25 CFM Engineer Improvements Baxter&Woodman, Inc. Elgin NPDES MS4 Program Implementation 20 11/30/18 Glenview Engineering Plan Review 40 12/30/18 Lindsey Zver, PE,CFM Project Glenview Engineering 40 12/31/2018 25 Baxter&Woodman, Inc. Engineer Plan Review Elgin NPDES MS4 Program Implementation 20 12/31/2018 Gilberts Plan Review 15 12/31/2018 Hank Martin,CHMM Technician Various Technician 75 12/31/2018 25 Baxter&Woodman, Inc. Roles—Multiple Projects e of Mount ospect I ptm��rm II III' IIIIII w1K ortrllCtm Il�u mur m,I llliimir muni tmm:rvrm terucu II FI III BAXTE /J'0,,MOODMAN ry :oii�lnp9B ia�lValll�fl:;a'�. 0 n;u�tn I J I i i ( r PROJECT TEAM The Village of Mount Prospect will receive the benefits of a comprehensive,well-coordinated project team with expertise in all of the project elements. This project team will meet all defined schedules and the project budget. Mount N')SPect i I; rI CLIENT LIAISON Andy',Zaletel,LISP PROJECT MANAGER Dan Bounds, PE, D.WRE PROJECT ENGINEERS Corey Van Dyk, EIT, CFM Lindsey Zver, PE, CFM TECHNICIAN Hank Martin,CHMM. ospect I p n�� m II III' Illlll wtK ortrllC m llhu murgr. I�liimir mural nm:ry m rucu II 1III BAXTE, »' If00DMAN ry �,�:g111 .�B �a'��IIIfl:;�'�. n;ultn J 1 J I i I IC r lll 1l PROJECT MANAGER• DAN BOUNDS, PE, D.WRE Dan will serve as the Village's Project Manager, main i point of contact, and lead technical resource for NPDES III]ll��G Compliance services. His responsibilities include keeping Village staff informed throughout the project and �flfrlu��nl� confirming your goals are being met. Dan has over 20 r,i.11rl jai; years of MS4 program development and implementation experience in Illinois and other states, providing a unique perspective and vast experience with innovative Cain (presented at eves-al conferences �r�c�e!dirv;; the ASCE �'�(��II/CeI��IdA�I�lir�lc�'�r� IMS' approaches for MS4 program implementation. He leads rnlp: ernertadon Semnar. a team of MS4 permit implementation staff focused on determining the best use of available resources for compliance with municipal NPDES permits. Dan works out of our Crystal Lake office and primarily is dedicated to assisting Illinois municipalities with their MS4 programs. Dan has assisted over 100 municipalities, counties, and state agencies with MS4 program development and implementation. His MS4 program experience includes: • Illicit discharge detection,resolution, enforcement guidance,and training; • MS4 municipal facility inspections and training,good housekeeping BMP implementation; • State MS4 permit review and negotiations; • MS4 program review, development,and ordinance review/updates; • Municipal stormwater quality management plan development,protocol development; • Level of service development and MS4 program budgeting; • Shared municipal services and countywide MS4 program development; • MS4 documentation development- NOI, SMPP,Annual Facility Inspection Report(AFIR); • Best Management Practices (BMP) development,guidance,and training; • Staff training,management training,and train-the-trainer; • Public Education and Outreach materials,public participation,website content development; • Presentations to the public and to City/Village council on MS4 topics; • Stormwater system inventory and inspection/evaluation; • Commercial/industrial MS4 compliance inspections; • Emergency MS4 discharge response, coordination with multiple agencies; • MS4 Construction site inspection program development, SWPPP development and inspections; • Water quality monitoring and MS4 program effectiveness assessments; • Stakeholder interaction and watershed group participation; and • Regulatory audit preparation,assistance during audits,and post-audit response. I p n�� m II III' Illlll w K or rllC m mllhu murgr. I�liimir mural nm:ry m ucu II 1III BAXTE /J'0,,MOODMAN �,�:Ilnln .�B �a'��IIIfl:;�'�. 0! n;ultn Lricyii r r, J I Il i ( r Project Engineer- Corey Van Dyk, EIT, CFM Corey joined Baxter&Woodman's Water Resources Department shortly after completing his Master of Science in Engineering degree from the University of Texas at Austin. He has performed outfall inspections and wet weather sampling at a number of communities, including Elgin, Lake Bluff, Glenview,Kenilworth,and Winnetka. Corey has experience identifying illicit discharges,analyzing lab results,and training others in the field. Project Engineer- Lindsey Zver, PE, CFM Lindsey has six years of experience in environmental and water resources engineering. She has served as the Project Engineer providing MS4 services for Elgin, South Barrington, Glenview Lake Bluff, program g� g , and several other communities.She has performed MS4 outfall screening,wet weather and dry weather sampling, public education and training, and stakeholder group participation. Lindsey was responsible for preparing permit renewals to the IEPA and MS4 Annual Facility Inspection Reports for numerous municipal agencies. Technician- Hank Martin, CHMM Hank has 30 years of experience assisting with stormwater, water, and wastewater systems. He provides assistance with inspection, design, construction,and operation of a wide variety of municipal systems,as well as with permit and compliance requirements. Hank regularly performs inspections of industrial and commercial facilities for our NPDES MS4 projects in an efficient and professional manner. Baxter&Woodman Support Staff Baxter & Woodman staff includes water, sanitary, stormwater, civil, transportation, mechanical, structural,electrical,and environmental engineers,wetland specialists, and water and wastewater operators. The engineering personnel is supported by technicians, surveyors, CAD operators, construction managers and inspectors,and public relations and administrative assistants. We have 225+ employees who serve municipal/government clients from our ten regional office locations: Ipn�� mIIIII' IlllllwKorrllCmllhumurgr. I�liimirmurulnm:rvmucu II � III BAXTE, » If�I��OODMAN �,�:g111 .�B �a'��IIIfl:;�'�. 0! n;ultn Lricyii r r, J Ifr i APPENDIX A RESUMES /�gJyAlkN BAXTEIi'ry, i�UVV00DMAN Daniel G. Bounds, PE, D.WRE Project Manager Education Dan specializes in environmental engineering and regulatory management, with M.B.A.-Business Administration, emphasis on MS4 program development and implementation,watershed planning; Eastern Illinois University,2001 stormwater program management; surface water quality; and wastewater treatment, including NPDES permitting, program management and compliance B.S.-Civil Engineering,University assistance. He has comprehensive experience with federal and state regulatory of Illinois,1993 agencies regarding point and non-point source NPDES; MS4; TMDLs; combined sewer overflow/sanitary sewer overflow(CSO/SSO);industrial pretreatment;and Joined Firm in 2016 other water resources management issues. Dan has been the lead technical specialist in the development and implementation Years of Experience: 25 of numerous aspects of regional and municipal MS4 programs, including the development of model programs and notice of intent (NOI) development; MS4 Honors/Awards program funding;data collection requirements;program prioritization efforts;best Diplomat,Water Resources management practices (BMP) development; inspection and enforcement Engineer(D.WRE),American procedures; staff annual training; audit preparation, and environmental Academy of Water Resources performance reporting; often requiring coordination and negotiation with Engineers,2009 regulatory agencies. Registrations Representative Projects Licensed Professional Engineer: Elgin,Illinois Illinois NPDES MS4 Program Implementation California Lead technical specialist for MS4 program review and development, program implementation,training materials development,and annual staff training. Lake Bluff,Illinois MS4 Program Review and Development Project manager and lead technical specialist for MS4 program development and implementation, including existing program review, program prioritization, best management practices development,and Notice of Intent(NOI)submittal. Joliet,Illinois NPDES MS4 Program Implementation Lead technical specialist for MS4 program review and development, program implementation,training materials development,and annual staff training. Carol Stream,Illinois MS4 Program Review and Development Project manager and lead technical specialist for MS4 program development and implementation, including existing program review, program prioritization, best management practices development,and Notice of Intent(NOI)development. Lake County,Illinois NPDES MS4 Stormwater Program Assessment Project Manager for the technical aspects of an assessment of the Lake County,IL Phase II MS4 stormwater program.A report of findings, program strengths,and recommendations for future enhancements was developed. www.baxterwoodman.com ge of Mount ospect 228,1.0 gl ptm��rmaII I IIIIIIII wtK or1rllCfmsrllhu murg . liliimu mural tmmmrvrm to uru IPI III "° BAXTE ,ifflOODMAN ,a:allnln.9 Ha�lValll�fl:;a'�. n;ultn �.ricy>>r r r, J Il Ir i I i Daniel G.Bounds,PE,D.WRE Page 2 of 2 Lake County,Illinois NPDES MS4 Stormwater Management Program Project Manager for all technical aspects of an assessment of Lake County, IL's stormwater NPDES MS4 program.The assessment included regulatory evaluation; recordkeeping and reporting assessment; facilities and training evaluation; and assessment of roadway and construction BMP implementation. Assessment findings were used to develop the County's Stormwater Management Program plan (SMPP)that describes the County's overall program implementation structure and requirements. Various Communities MS4 Program Development and Implementation Project Manager for MS4 Program and Implementation services for the following municipalities: • Antioch • Beecher • Downers Grove • Elgin • Elmhurst • Geneva • Hanover Park • Joliet • Lake Bluff • Lisle • New Lenox Township • Oakwood Hills • Palatine • Round Lake • Skokie • South Elgin • Wheeling • Will County www.baxterwoodman.co ge of Mount ospect 228,1.0 Ipim��tmIIIII' IlllllwKor1rllCfmtll�umurg . liliimirtmurulimm:rvtmitucu IIP� III BAXTER,,' 1�I�00DMAN ,a:allnln.9 Ha�lValll�fl:;a'�. 0/ n;ultn �.ricyii r r, J Ir i I BAXTE "�J°ydlUlNOODMAN Corey Van Dyk, EIT, CFM Project Engineer Education Corey earned his Bachelor of Science in Engineering degree from Calvin College M.S., Engineering— with a civil concentration and his Master of Science in Engineering degree from the Environmental and Water University of Texas at Austin. His coursework focused on stochastic hydrology, physical and chemical treatment,and environmental fluid mechanics.His master's Resources Engineering, thesis work centered on validating a morphodynamic model for river deltas University of Texas at Austin, through comparison of metrics to experimental and field-scale deltas. He is a 2015 member of the firm's Water Resources Department and assists senior engineers on B.S.,Engineering—International a variety of stormwater related projects. Civil Concentration, Calvin Representative Projects College,2013 Elgin,IL NPDES Phase II Assistance Joined Firm in 2016 Project Engineer working with the City to provide comprehensive services to meet the requirements of the IEPA's General NPDES Permit No. ILR40 for Municipal Years of Experience: 3 Separate Storm Sewer Systems. Services provided included preparation of Annual Facility Inspection Reports, as well as outfall inspections and water quality Certifications monitoring. Engineer in Training Glenview,IL NPDES Phase II Assistance Certified Floodplain Manager Project Engineer assisting the Village with implementation of their NPDES II program including wet weather sampling. Lake Bluff,IL NPDES Phase II Assistance Assisted Project engineer to develop a Stormwater Management Program to meet requirements of NPDES Permit No.ILR40 by the submittal of the IEPA's Notice of Intent focusing on stormwater impacts for public education and outreach,public involvement/participation, illicit discharge detection and elimination, establishment of stormwater runoff controls, pollution prevention for municipal operations and water quality monitoring. Glenview,IL Village Plan Reviewer Reviews engineering plans for new single family homes,additions,residential flood control structures and drainage improvements,utility permits.Assists the review of commercial engineering plan reviews. Frankfort,IL North WWTP Floodplain Study Assisted with preparation of hydrologic and hydraulic model to evaluate impacts of proposed upstream treatment plant improvements on the downstream areas along Union Drainage Ditch. Prepared reports for permitting agencies, summarizing results of the analysis. Glenview,IL The Circles Roadway and Utility Improvements Project Engineer performing stormwater modeling to evaluate flooding in subdivision,along with analyzing several alternative improvements. Assisted in the storm sewer design and permitting. www.baxterwoodman.com ge of Mount ospect 228,1.0 I pfn��rmaII III IIIIII wtK ortrllCfm Il�u murg .11iliimutmurul fnmmrvrm sfe uru I PI IES) BAXTER,,'/J'0,ifflO0DMAN ,a:allnln.9 Ha�lValll�fl:;e �j, n;ultn Ir i I IC p�uwuHa B A X T E I ,,�pyV O O D M A N Lindsey E. Zver, PE,CFM Project Engineer Education Lindsey specializes in plan review, and environmental and water resources B.S.,Civil Engineering engineering. She is a member of the firm's Municipal Development Assistance University of Illinois,2012 Department and serves as project engineer on a variety of plan review and stormwater related projects. Joined Firm in 2012 Representative Projects Years of Experience: 6 Mount Prospect,IL Storm Sewer System Basin Delineation Certifications Identified tributary areas to sewer outlets using Village GIS data.Used contours, Licensed Professional Engineer: storm and combined sewer atlases, aerial photographs and hydraulic atlases to Illinois delineate tributary areas. Refined mapping based on extreme (100 year) events. Village will use delineations for future stormwater models. Certified Floodplain Manager Elgin,IL NPDES Phase II Assistance Associations Project engineer working with the City to provide comprehensive services to meet Illinois Association for the requirements of the IEPA's General NPDES Permit No. ILR40 for Municipal Floodplain and Stormwater Separate Storm Sewer Systems. Services provided included all six Minimum Control Measures as well as preparation of permit renewals and Annual Facility Management Inspection Reports. Glenview,IL NPDES Phase II Assistance Project Engineer assisting the Village with implementation of their NPDES Il program including wet weather sampling. Lake Bluff,IL NPDES Phase II Assistance Assisted Project engineer to develop a Stormwater Management Program to meet requirements of NPDES Permit No.ILR40 by the submittal of the IEPA's Notice of Intent focusing on stormwater impacts for public education and outreach,public involvement/participation, illicit discharge detection and elimination, establishment of stormwater runoff controls,pollution prevention for municipal operations and water quality monitoring. South Barrington,IL NPDES Phase II Assistance Project Engineer assisting the Village with implementation of their NPDES Il program including wet weather sampling. Glenview,IL Village Plan Reviewer Reviews engineering plans for new single family homes, additions, residential flood control structures and drainage improvements, utility permits.Assists the review of commercial engineering plan reviews. www.baxterwoodman.com ge of Mount ospect 228,1.0 I pin��rm Il 1 11llllll wtK ortrllClmsrllhu murgm. liliimu mural inm:rvrm eruri I01III °° BAXTER,,'/ ifflOODMAN ,a:allnn plHa�lValll�fl:;e n;ultn �.ricy>> r r, J IG r r BAXTEIfi ,/"°J°kW00DMAN T.H. (Hank) Martin, CHMM Education Hank assists with the design, construction, and operation of water and Mechanical Engineering,South wastewater systems, as well as with permit and compliance requirements. He Dakota School of Mines and also has extensive experience in testing, remediation system design and Technology operation, and site closure of hazardous waste sites and leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites. Hank has assisted several of our clients with the preparation of Environmental Phase 1 Site Assessments,which has allowed them University of Illinois,Chicago to make informed decisions regarding real estate sales or purchases. Circle Campus Hank is retired from the McHenry County Board of Health having served the Joined Firm in 1988 community for approximately ten years in various roles including Board President. Years of Experience: 30 Registrations Representative Projects IEPA Class A Public Water Supply Operator NPDES Discharge Permitting Registered Environmental Elgin,IL Professional Illicit discharge inspections and site inspections for NPDES permit compliance. Certified Hazardous Materials Glenview,IL Manager Storm sewer outfall inspection for 2013 NPDES Phase II Assistance. Certificate of Competency: Lake Bluff,IL Industrial Wastewater Stormwater site inspection for 2014 NPDES Phase II Assistance. Treatment Works Haeger Potteries,East Dundee,IL Operator(LUST water Project Engineer for stormwater sampling,field sampling and National Pollution remediation systems) Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit application. Asbestos Building Inspector Cary,IL Project Engineer for WWTP stormwater NPDES permit and reporting Associations requirements. Academy of Certified Hazardous Materials Managers Kenilworth,IL International Society of Illicit discharge inspections for Skokie Ditch preliminary design. Technical and Environmental Professionals Lakewood,IL National Groundwater Annual NPDES Phase II permit compliance sampling and flow monitoring for wastewater discharge permit. Association National Registry of Northern Illinois Metal Finishing,Rockford,IL Environmental Professionals Project Engineer for stormwater sampling,field sampling and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)permit application. Honors Honorary Member Award 2008 American Water Works Association www.baxterwoodman.com ge of Mount ospect* 228,1.0 Iapi ��tmaII III IIIIII wfK or irllCfm Ilhu murG .l liliimutmurulainmmrvtm pit uru Ig loll BiAXTE ,,MOODMAN ,a:allnln.9 Ha�lValll�fl:;a'�. n;ultn �.ricy>> r r, OOO.OMPMP2.05 Civil I Iren m, i Ing k,,,,;///, m IIIC 5 LN IM... "III" III II' C V',A11,,cj February 8, 2018 irc�sti ni I,i��r`� I'tfln ,r r�Pnmit Sean Dorsey, Director of Public Works Village of Mount Prospect "i �I`'r'r""`�� 1700 W. Central Road Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 RE: MS4 PERMIT ASSISTANCE: 2018-2019 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Dear Sean: We appreciate the opportunity to submit a proposal to provide professional consulting services to the Village of Mount Prospect (Village) in connection with the Village's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit. Manhard offers to assist the Village of Mount Prospect with the following tasks on a Time and Material basis. Scope of Work I. OUTFALL INSPECTIONS This task would include the following: A. Conduct dry-weather outfall inspections per the requirements of the NPDES General Storm Water Permit ILR40. B. Visually inspect 120 outfalls during dry conditions, photograph, and complete data form. C. During the inspection, document existing conditions, as well as observed erosion, slope stabilization, and other maintenance needs. D. Summarize results in report form and submit to the Village for follow up inspection and repair, if necessary. II. WATER QUALITY TESTING This task would include the following: A. Coordinate with a lab to collect grab samples at 4 locations. Grab samples will be collected within 48 hours of a precipitation event greater than or equal to 0.25 inches in a 24-hour period. The lab will perform an analysis of the following parameters: Total suspended solids, total nitrogen, total phosphorous, fecal coliform, chlorides and oil and grease. B. Summarize results in report form and make recommendations for further testing, if necessary. III. STAFF TRAINING This task would include the following: Conduct one (1) in-house training event to educate Village employees about storm water management, potential sources of contaminants, Best Management Practices (BMPs), and the Village's Storm Water Management Plan. Mr. Sean Dorsey OOO.OMPMP2.05 February 8,2018 Pa e 2 IV. Industrial & Commercial Inspections This task would include the following: A. Conduct inspections at 42 high priority industrial and commercial properties to look for illicit discharges and potential sources of storm water pollution. A one-page inspection form will be completed and photographs taken to document site conditions. The inspector will discuss the inspection results with the on-site property representative, if available. B. Prepare summary memo outlining the results of the inspections. C. Update the high priority inspection list and associated maps. V. MEETINGS This task would include attendance at meetings with Village staff. REIMBURSABLES VI. Reimbursables shall include outside consultant's fees, reproduction costs, messenger or special mail service, or other project-related expenses. Fee Estimate sco,00 It6th Year 1 (2018) Ydar 2 (2019) I. Outfall Inspections $7,000.00 $7,000.00 II. Water Quality Testing $1,400.00* $1,400.00* III. Staff Training $1,300.00 $1,300.00 IV. Industrial & Commercial Inspection Program $10.000.00 $10.000.00 V. Meetings $1,000.00 $1,000.00 VI. Reimbursables $200.00 $200.00 Total Per Year $20,900.00 $20,900.00 TOTAL $41,800.00 *Does not include lab fee Manhard will notify the Village upon reaching the established Time and Material, not-to-exceed limit. No additional work will be performed without prior written approval by the Village. We have included "Exhibit A", which details services not included in the scope of this Proposal. If you would like to add any of the listed additional services, please notify us and we will revise this Proposal accordingly. The terms of the attached "General Terms & Conditions" dated January 1, 2015, which Client hereby acknowledges receiving, are incorporated and made a part of this Proposal. If the above is acceptable, please have this Proposal executed. We will begin work as soon as we receive an executed copy of this Proposal. This Proposal will be null and void if not accepted by June 1, 2018. Mr. Sean Dorsey OOO.OMPMP2.05 February 8,2018 Pa 03 Thank you again for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours truly, MANHARD CONSULTING, LTD. Marcy Knysz, AICP, LEED AP, CPESC Senior Project Manager ACCEPTED: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT By: Title: (Authorized Representative) Date: (Printed Name) Invoices will be sent to the Client via email. Invoices should be forwarded to: Name: Email: Phone: GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS January 1,2015 1. ONE INSTRUMENT/INCONSISTENCIES—These GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS, and the Manhard PROPOSAL to which these terms are attached(collectively this"Agreement")shall be deemed one instrument.Wherever there is a conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of these GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS, the PROPOSAL, and any plans or specifications, as applicable, the provisions provided for in these GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS shall, in all instances, control and prevail. These GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS shall apply to the work provided in the PROPOSAL to which this is attached or an amendment or modification, including an AGREEMENT FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES. 2. ENTIRE AGREEMENT—These GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS, the PROPOSAL, and any plans or specifications represent the entire Agreement between the Parties and supercedes any and all prior oral or written understandings between the Parties. Changes to these GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS shall only be binding when in writing and agreed to by both parties. 3. MEDIATION — All disputes between relating to this Agreement or the Project (as defined in the Proposal) shall first be submitted to mediation with a mediator selected by the Parties.The costs of the mediator shall be split evenly between Client and Manhard. If the Client and Manhard cannot agree on a mediator, then each of Client and Manhard shall nominate a mediator and the two nominated mediators shall select the ultimate mediator. Client and Manhard shall include a similar mediation provision in all of their respective agreements with other parties regarding the Project and will require all such other persons or entities to include a similar mediation provision in all agreements with their respective subcontractors, subconsultants,suppliers and fabricators. Such mediation shall be a condition precedent to a party filing any judicial or other proceeding against the other,except with regard to delinquent fees owed to Manhard. 4. AUTHORIZATION TO SIGN — The person signing this Agreement represents and warrants that he/she is signing this Agreement on behalf of the Client and is authorized to enter into this Agreement on the Client's behalf. 5. BREACH AND COST OF COLLECTION — In the event Client breaches the terms of this Agreement, Manhard shall be entitled, in addition to the specific remedies provided for in this Agreement,to pursue all remedies available at law or in equity. Client further agrees that Manhard shall be entitled to recover all costs incurred in enforcing any provision of this Agreement, including court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. All payments received from the Client will be credited first to interest, then to the cost of enforcement,and then to the amount due to Manhard 6. CHANGES IN REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT—The services provided by Manhard under this Agreement were determined based upon the applicable municipal, county, state and/or federal regulations, codes, laws and requirements that were in existence on the date of this Agreement. Any material additions, deletions or changes in the regulatory environment, which require an increase in the scope of services to be performed,will be an Additional Service. 7. CONTROLLING LAW—This Agreement is to be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois. 8. CURE PERIOD — If during the project term, Client observes or becomes aware of any improper service which has been provided by Manhard, Client agrees to immediately notify Manhard of the same, in writing. Manhard shall then have five working days to cure, or begin to cure in a diligent manner, such improper service before Client may exercise its rights under any default and remedy provision provided for in this Agreement, including the right to take corrective action prior to the termination of the cure period. If Client fails to notify Manhard of any defects within thirty(30)working days of learning of the defects, any objections to Manhard's work shall be waived. Manhard will not accept any backcharges unless Client has complied with the foregoing and allowed Manhard the opportunity to cure any problem. 9. DELAYS — Client agrees that Manhard shall not be responsible for damages arising directly from any delays for causes beyond Manhard's control. For purposes of this Agreement, such causes include, but are not limited to, strikes or other labor disputes,severe weather disruptions or other natural disasters;fires, riots,war or other emergencies or acts of God;failure of any government agency to act in a timely manner; failure of performance by the Client or the Client's contractors or consultants; or discovery of any hazardous substances or differing site conditions. In addition, if delays resulting from any such causes increase the cost or time required by Manhard to perform its services in an orderly and efficient manner, Manhard shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment in schedule and/or compensation. 10. ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST—Manhard's Opinions of Probable Cost provided for herein, if applicable, are to be made on the basis of Manhard's experience and qualifications and represents Manhard's judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer generally familiar with the construction industry. However, because Manhard has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services furnished by others, the Contractor's methods of determining prices, or competitive bidding or market conditions, Manhard cannot and does not warrant, represent or guarantee that proposals, bids or actual construction cost will not vary from Manhard's Opinions of Probable Cost. If Client wishes greater assurance as to probable construction cost,Client shall employ an independent cost estimator. 11. INDEMNITY—To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Client shall waive any right of contribution and shall indemnify and hold harmless Manhard, its agents, employees and consultants from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to, attorneys'fees, arising out of or resulting from or in connection with the performance of the work which results from Client's negligence or the negligence of Client's agents. This indemnity shall not require the Client to indemnify Manhard for the negligent acts of Manhard or its agents. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Manhard shall waive any right of contribution and shall indemnify and hold harmless the Client, its agents, employees and consultants from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys'fees,arising out of or resulting from or in connection with the performance of the work which results from Manhard's negligence or the negligence of Manhard's agents. This indemnity shall not require Manhard to indemnify the Client for the negligent acts of the Client or its agents. 12. MANHARD'S INSURANCE COVERAGE—Before work is commenced on the site,and throughout the duration of the project, Manhard shall maintain the following insurance coverage so as to indemnify Client from all claims of bodily injury or property damage that may occur from Manhard's negligence: a. Workmen's compensation and occupational disease insurance covering all employees in statutory limits who perform any obligations assumed under Contract. b. Public liability and property damage liability insurance covering all operations under contract; the limits for bodily injury or death not less than $2,000,000 for each accident; for property damage, not less than $500,000 for each accident. C. Automobile liability insurance on all self-propelled vehicles used in connection with the Project, whether owned, non-owned or hired; public liability limits of not less than$1,000,000 for each accident. At the Client's request, Manhard shall (i)provide a Certificate of Insurance evidencing Manhard's compliance with the above requirements,and(ii)include Client as an"additional insured"on the insurance policy. 13. LIMITATION OF MANHARD'S LIABILITY—In recognition of the relative risks of the Project to the Client and Manhard, the risks have been allocated such that the Client agrees,to the fullest extent permitted by law,to limit the liability of Manhard and Manhard's consultants to Client, to Contractor and any Subcontractors on the Project and to those claiming by or through Client for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages or claim expenses from any cause or liability of Manhard's or Manhard's consultants to all of those named herein with respect to the Project shall not exceed $50,000.00 or the agreed upon professional services fee, whichever is greater. Should Client desire a greater limitation of liability it is available for an additional fee as agreed to in writing by Client and Manhard. Client acknowledges and understands that Manhard's liability exposure for potential claims related to its performance of services is being specifically limited by this Agreement,and that Client's potential recovery in a claim situation is limited to the amount herein.Client agrees that based upon Manhard's fee and services, it is unreasonable to hold Manhard responsible for liability exposure greater than the set limit. 14. INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED TO MANHARD—Client agrees to provide Manhard with such site information as may be needed to enable Manhard to perform its services. Such information may include but shall not be limited to: latest plat of record; current title report and the documents contained therein; previous reports;title search report/chain-of-title documents; copies of environmental permits, registrations, liens, or cleanup records for the property; building plans and specifications; location, elevation and sizes of existing gas,telephone, electrical,street lighting and cable television lines on-site and off-site; boundary survey; wetland delineation; soil borings; archaeological phase 1 survey; first floor foundation plan and such other information as may be requested by Manhard,from time to time. Client shall not be responsible for providing site information which Manhard has specifically agreed to provide in its Proposal. 15. MANHARD'S RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED — Manhard may rely on the accuracy and completeness of any information furnished to Manhard by or on Client's behalf. Furthermore, Client agrees to hold Manhard harmless from any engineering errors, including but not limited to, grading, earthwork analysis and off-site stormwater outlets, resulting from inaccurate site information which is provided by Client, including topographical surveys which have been prepared by consultants other than Manhard. 16. PAYMENT—Invoices will be submitted to the Client for payment on a monthly basis as the work progresses. Invoices are due within thirty days of rendering. Within thirty days of receipt of Invoice, Client shall examine the invoice in detail to satisfy themselves as to its accuracy and completeness and shall raise any question or objection that Client may have regarding the invoice within this thirty-day period. After sixty(60)days from receipt of invoice, Client waives any question or objection to the invoice not previously raised. If Client fails to make any payment due Manhard for services and expenses within thirty days after receipt of Manhard's invoice therefore, the amounts due Manhard will be increased at the rate of 1.0 percent per month (or the maximum rate of interest permitted by law, if less),from said thirtieth day. In addition, Manhard may, after giving notice to Client, suspend services under this Agreement until Manhard has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and charges. In the event Manhard elects to suspend its services,and after receipt of payment in full by Client, Manhard shall resume services under this Agreement, and the time schedule and compensation shall be equitably adjusted to compensate for the period of suspension plus any other reasonable time and expense necessary for Manhard to resume performance. In addition, prior to commencing such services, Manhard shall have the right, from time to time, to require Client to provide a retainer payment for services to be rendered. Manhard shall have no liability to Client for any costs or damages incurred as a result of such suspension that is caused by Client. 17. REIMBURSABLES — Reimbursable expenses shall mean one hundred eighteen percent (118%) of all costs incurred by Manhard relative to the Project, including without limitation all outside consultants' fees, reproduction costs, messenger or special mail service,and other Project-related expenses. 18. PERMITS&FEES—Unless the proposal specifically provides otherwise, Client shall be responsible for paying all application and permit fees and obtaining all permits. Manhard does not warrant, represent or guarantee that the permits or approvals will be issued. 19. RIGHTS-OF-WAY& EASEMENTS— Client shall be responsible for obtaining (or vacating) all right-of-way, easements, real covenants and/or agreements necessary for the proper development of the property, including but not limited to right-of-way and easements which may be necessary for roadway and access improvements; stormwater conveyance and detention; sanitary sewer collection, pumping and treatment facilities; water distribution, treatment or storage facilities; and temporary construction access. 20. SEVERABILITY— If any clause or provision of this Agreement is determined to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction,the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect. 21. STANDARD OF CARE—Manhard will strive to perform its services in accordance with a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other Design Professionals in the same locale. 22. TERMINATION—This Contract shall terminate at the time Manhard has completed its services for Client, or prior to that time, if one party provides to the other party written notice, whereby such termination date shall be effective seven (7) days after receipt of such notice. Client agrees to pay for all services, expenses and charges, as agreed,which have been incurred by Manhard through the date of termination. 23. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY—If Client is a contractor for the owner of the property,the parties acknowledge that Manhard is intended to be a third party beneficiary of the construction contract entered into between owner and Client. 24. USE OF DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONIC DATA — All documents (including drawings and specifications) as well as electronic data(including designs, plans or data stored in machine readable form)that are provided to Client are instruments of service with respect to the Project. Manhard grants an irrevocable non-exclusive license to the Client relative to the Client's use of the documents in connection with the Project. Client agrees not to reuse or make any modification to the documents without the prior written authorization of Manhard. The authorized reproduction of the documents/electronic data from Manhard's system to an alternate system cannot be accomplished without the introduction of inexactitudes, anomalies and errors, and therefore, Manhard cannot and does not make any representations regarding such compatibility.With respect to such reproduction or unauthorized use, Client agrees to indemnify and hold Manhard harmless from all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs, arising from Client's unauthorized use, misuse, modification or misinterpretation of the documents or electronic data. 25. WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE — Client and Manhard mutually agree to waive all claims of consequential damages arising from disputes,claims or other matters relating to this Agreement. 26. MANHARD'S SITE VISITS — If requested by Client or as required by the Proposal, Manhard shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of construction as Manhard deems necessary in order to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the various aspects of contractor's work. Construction staking or survey control staking is not considered a site visit. Such visits and observations by Manhard are not intended to be exhaustive or to extend to every aspect of the work in progress, or to involve inspections of the work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Manhard in this Agreement, but rather are to be limited to spot checking, and similar methods of general observation of the work based on Manhard's exercise of professional judgment. Based on information obtained during such visits and such observations, Manhard shall endeavor to determine in general if such work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents and Manhard shall keep Client informed of the progress of the work. The purpose of Manhard's visits to the site will be to enable Manhard to better carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned to and undertaken by Manhard hereunder including, but not limited to, visits during the Construction Phase and the Surveying Phase. Manhard shall not, during such visits or as a result of such observations of work in progress, supervise, direct or have control over the work, nor shall Manhard have authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work, for any failure of contractor(s)to comply with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to the furnishing and performing the work or authority to stop the work. Accordingly, Manhard neither guarantees the performance of any contractor(s) nor assumes responsibility for any contractor's failure to furnish and perform its work in accordance with the contract documents. Should the Client determine that such service is necessary, Manhard will provide such services as the resident project representative as an Additional Service. Manhard shall not have the authority to instruct any contractor to suspend or terminate its work on the Project. Manhard shall not be responsible for the acts or omissions of any contractor(s), or of any subcontractor(s), any supplier(s), or of any other person or organization performing or furnishing any of the work. 27. DESIGN WITHOUT CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION—It is understood and agreed that Manhard's basic services under this Agreement do not include project observation or review of the Client's performance or any other construction phase services, and that such services will be provided for by the Client. The Client assumes all responsibility for interpretation of any contract documents and for construction observation, and the Client waives any claims against Manhard that may be in any way connected thereto. In addition, the Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless Manhard, its officers, directors, employees and subconsultants (collectively, Manhard) against all damages, liabilities or costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs, arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of such services by other persons or entities and from any and all claims arising from modifications, clarifications, interpretations, adjustments or changes made to any contract documents to reflect changed field or other conditions,except for claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of Manhard If the Client requests in writing that Manhard provide any specific construction phase services and if Manhard agrees in writing to provide such services,then Manhard shall be compensated for Additional Services as provided in Exhibit A. 28. LIMITATION OF RELIANCE — If applicable, the Phase I ESA and/or wetland delineation report(s) will be prepared by Manhard for the sole and exclusive use of the Client and the Client's financing institution involved specifically with this property. Nothing under this Agreement between Manhard and the Client shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the Client and Manhard, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Client and Manhard and not for the benefit of any other party. In particular, Manhard does not intend,without its written consent,for the report(s)to be used or relied upon by anyone other than its Client and the Client's financing institution involved specifically with this property. Use of the report(s) by any other party would be unauthorized and such use would be at the sole risk of the user. EXHIBIT A ADDITIONAL SERVICES Additional services (including, but not limited to those listed below)shall be performed by Manhard, if requested, at an additional cost ("Additional Services"). The following services or items are not included within the scope of work outlined in this PROPOSAL to which this is attached unless specifically set forth therein. Such additional services shall be provided either for an agreed upon Lump Sum Fee or on a Time and Material Basis,subject to the rates as listed below: SCHEDULE OF TIME AND MATERIAL RATES FOR 2018 CATEGORY CURRENT HOURLY RATES President $195.00 Executive Vice President $195.00 Vice President $180.00 Area Manager $175.00 Senior Project Manager $140.00-$180.00 Director $120.00-$160.00 Senior Planner $110.00-$160.00 Manager of Community Development $140.00-$160.00 Project Manager $130.00-$150.00 Survey Manager $135.00-$150.00 Senior Construction Manager $125.00-$145.00 Project Engineer $105.00-$140.00 Project Surveyor $105.00-$125.00 Senior Design Technician $110.00-$120.00 Construction Manager/Coordinator $105.00-$120.00 Construction Inspector $85.00-$110.00 Staff Engineer $95.00-$110.00 Staff Surveyor $95.00-$110.00 Staff Planner $80.00-$120.00 Design Technician $85.00-$115.00 Engineering CADD/G.I.S. Technician $75.00-$105.00 Land Planner/Environmental Planner $85.00-$110.00 Survey/Construction Technician $85.00-$105.00 Landscape Designer/Architect $90.00-$140.00 Administrative Assistant $65.00 Intern $55.00 CADD Work Station $42.00 1-Person Crew $125.00 2-Person Crew $165.00 Expert Testimony& Depositions $250.00 REIMBURSABLES Mileage $0.55/mile Printing-Paper $0.15/sf Printing-Vellum $1.75/sf Printing-Mylar, Film, Clear Acetate $2.50/sf I. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES A. Completion of a title search for the property. B. Evaluation of additional non-scope considerations including,but not limited to,asbestos-containing materials,floodplains, radon, lead-based paint,lead in drinking water,threatened/endangered species, historic/cultural resources,etc. II. ALL WETLANDS SERVICES III. ALL LAND PLANNING SERVICES IV. ALL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES V. ALL TRAFFIC SERVICES VI. ALL TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEYING SERVICES VII. ALL SURVEYING SERVICES VIII. ALL FINAL ENGINEERING SERVICES IX. ALL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES X. MISCELLANEOUS A. Attend additional meetings or public hearings not outlined above, with the Client, design team, or governmental agencies, including preparation of Exhibits. B. Coordination and filing as required for municipal meetings and hearings. C. Providing additional services in connection with the project including services normally furnished by the Client or services not otherwise provided for in this proposal such as, but not limited to,the use of consultants to prepare: • Traffic studies, reports,or traffic signal design • Highway, parking lot or driveway lighting design • Soils reports, borings,testing or inspections • Structural or electrical designs • Architectural services • Landscaping plans • Tree surveys • Historical preservation and archaeological studies or reports • Endangered species investigation and reports D. Preparation of electronic documents/data including, but not limited to, topographic surveys, plats, base drawings, preliminary engineering plans, landscape plans, final engineering plans and specifications, for transmittal to subconsultants.This service will be provided for a fee of$500.00. E. Overnight mail, messenger services, prints or mylars. F. Revisions of previously approved site"sketch" plans, studies, reports, design documents, preliminary engineering plans, drawings and specifications,after substantial completion of preliminary or final design. G. Providing additional services in connection with the Project to assist in obtaining permits from governmental agencies other than those listed. H. Planning,design,construction staking or construction services in connection with installation or relocation of utilities such as electrical,telephone,gas or cable television. I. Services resulting from facts revealed about conditions: 1)which are different from information about such conditions that Client previously provided to Manhard and upon which Manhard was entitled to rely; or 2) as to which Client had responsibility to provide information and such information was not previously provided. J. Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by Client for Contractor's work which is not executed or documents for out-of-sequence work. K. Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for Client in any litigation, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project(except for assistance in consultations which is expressly included as part of Basic Services). rd,h, 1 uuuuu uum um III I(1 fi l/r 2017 OUTFALL INSPECTION REPORT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COOK COUNTY, IL PREPARED FOR: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 (847) 870-5640 PREPARED BY. MANHARD CONSULTING 900 WOODLANDS PARKWAY VERNON HILLS, IL 60061 PHONE: (847) 325-7300 SEPTEMBER 2017 I IE 'E OIC'° , ,,,, °T ��° ��QI X,�T M �u 201.701„JA°T� L I,,,,, E IN P �,,,c riOI REPORT OS T III at)IIe of Cantents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................3 2. Potential Sources of Illicit Discharges........................................................................................3 3. Outfall Inspection ......................................................................................................................4 3.1 Background Data........................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Outfall Description ......................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Outfall Characteristics.................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Physical Indicators for Flowing Outfalls.......................................................................... 6 3.4.1 Odor................................................................................................................. 6 3.4.2 Turbidity............................................................................................................ 6 3.4.3 Color................................................................................................................. 6 3.4.4 Floatables......................................................................................................... 7 3.5 Chemical Pollutant Indicators of Flowing Outfalls........................................................... 8 3.5.1 Ammonia .......................................................................................................... 8 3.5.2 Chlorine............................................................................................................ 8 3.5.3 Copper.............................................................................................................. 9 3.5.4 Detergents........................................................................................................ 9 3.5.5 E. coli, Enterococci, and Total Coliform ............................................................ 9 3.5.6 Fluoride ............................................................................................................ 9 3.5.7 Phenol .............................................................................................................. 9 3.5.8 pH..................................................................................................................... 10 3.5.9 Phosphorus ...................................................................................................... 10 3.5.10 Potassium......................................................................................................... 10 3.5.11 Surfactants ....................................................................................................... 10 3.6 Non-Illicit Discharge Concerns....................................................................................... 10 3.7 Follow Up Investigation.................................................................................................. 11 3.8 Inspection Summary...................................................................................................... 11 I VIE,,,,LAGE OFMOUN T1 2017 Off„)„TFe' ,,, LL I DI SPDI,°„ec,rlON REPORT IIFii uii lire Figure 1 Characterizing Submersion and Flow Figure 2 Natural Sheen versus Synthetic III 4INes Table 1 Odor or Potential Illicit Discharges Table 2 Color of Potential Illicit Discharges Table 3 Floatables in Potential Illicit Discharges Table 4 Outfall Inspection Summary Ill,,,,,,,liit OfAIjplj,,,-.)eindices Appendix A Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form Appendix B Illicit Discharge Flow Chart Appendix C Outfall Location Maps Appendix D Outfall Inspection Forms and Photos I as ^G n,pge. MOU 20170k J1 TFAL I,,,,, nq s VI,,;;; `r �� IREPORT „ III introd t.jit.J ars Federal regulations through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) require that all Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), partially or fully in urbanized areas based on the 2000 census, obtain storm water permits for their discharges into receiving waters. Storm water runoff naturally contains numerous constituents; however, urbanization and urban activities (including municipal activities) typically increase concentrations to levels that may impact water quality. Pollutants associated with storm water include sediment, nutrients, bacteria and viruses, oil and grease, metals, organics, pesticides, and gross pollutants. Regulated systems include the conveyance or system of conveyances including roads with drainage systems, streets, catch basins, gutters, ditches, swales, manmade channels or storm sewers. Village of Mount Prospect is considered an MS4 community and therefore must follow the regulations of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's (TEPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit No. ILR40 for Discharges from MS4s. As part of this permit, MS4s are required to conduct annual inspections of the storm sewer outfalls. This report presents the results of the outfall inspections conducted in 2017 for the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois. „ Il��oten ti411oi..j a-ces of1hIlhibit III,,;; Iiisdh lir° es Inspecting storm water outfalls during dry-weather conditions reveals whether non-storm water flows exist. If non-storm water flows are observed, they can be screened and tested to determine whether pollutants are present. Any discharge to the storm sewer system that does not consist entirely of storm water is considered an illicit discharge. Illicit discharges are not permitted under the NPDES MS4 Permit. There are two primary situations that constitute illicit discharges; these include non-storm water runoff from contaminated sites and the deliberate discharge or dumping of non-storm water. Deliberate discharge or dumping can enter the storm sewer system in two ways: 1. Direct piping connections to the storm sewer system. 2. Indirect connections through subtle connections, such as dumping or spillway of materials into storm sewer drains. It is noted that not all dry-weather flows are considered inappropriate discharges. Under certain conditions, the following discharges are not considered inappropriate by USEPA or TEPA: • Water line flushing • Irrigation water • Landscaping irrigation . Springs • Diverted stream flows • Water from crawl spaces • Rising groundwater . Lawn watering • Uncontaminated groundwater . Individual car washing infiltration . Flows from riparian habitats and • Uncontaminated pumped wetlands groundwater . Dechlorinated swimming pool water • Discharges from potable water • Street wash water sources • Discharges from dewatering • Flows from foundation drains activities, if managed by appropriate • Air conditioning condensation controls as specified in a project's Page I as ^G n,pge. I ILAG E 01:e MOUN°T P R0SP QI, T 20170k J1 TFAU nqs V:_:' `r �� REPORT POI T erosion and sediment controlp Ian or stormwater management Ian p g The following non-stormwater discharges are prohibited by the NPDES ILR40 permit: • Concrete and wastewater from • Fuels washout of concrete (unless . Oils or other pollutants used in managed by an appropriate control) vehicle and equipment O&M • Drywall compound • Soaps, solvents, or detergents • Wastewater from washout and • Toxic or hazardous substances from cleanout of stucco a spill or other release • Paint • Any other pollutant that could cause • Form release oils or tend to cause water pollution • Curing compounds and other construction materials 3„ CXA Ips, 111 III III Iirms ectl girl The intent of the inspection is to gather information to determine if an illicit discharge is present. Field crews inspect the outfall by approaching on foot to a proximity that allows for visual observations to be made. Outfalls are inspected to determine which one of the three following conditions applies (see Figure 1): 1. The outfall is dry or damp with no observed flow. 2. Flowing discharges are observed from the outfall. 3. The outfall is partially or completely submerged with no observed flow or is inaccessible. The field crew photographs the outfall and completes applicable sections of the Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form (Appendix A). The need for on-site testing and obtaining grab samples for laboratory analysis is determined by using the Illicit Discharge Flow Chart (Appendix B) as guidance. Testing results are used to identify potential sources of pollution. Initial testing results are NOT intended to document the event for future removal and/or enforcement actions. If the initial testing results identify a potential illicit discharge, follow-up investigation procedures are conducted. Outfalls are inspected during dry-weather conditions, meaning there has been no precipitation within the preceding 72 hours. During the inspection, outfalls are visually inspected, photographed, and data reported on an outfall inspection form. These inspections are conducted by consulting outfall location maps, which can be found in Appendix C. The completed data forms and associated photos are located in Appendix D. The outfall inspection data form used to complete the outfall inspections is divided into five parts: 1. Background Data 2. Outfall Description 3. Physical Indicators 4. Physical Indicators for Flowing Outfalls 5. Non-Illicit Discharge Concerns. Page I as n t ,p,Ua- Figure 1 Characterizing Submersion and Flow Ili'v �I� 11 f Submerged: More than 1/2 below water. Partially submerged: Bottom is below Fully submerged:Can't see outfall. water. f( rf �r, , r��I�T�y/ �I�, � ,�� ter. ,/�% ��, f✓, , , V � m°I"N✓ wv«rr i I a Outfall fully submerged by debris. Fully submerged from downstream trees Partially submerged by leaf debris trapping debris. "back water". { a r Trickle Flow:Very narrow stream of Moderate Flow:Steady stream, but very Significant flow:(Source is a fire water. shallow depth. hydrant discharge). 3,f f:3a:ck(3uWaau.aiiridI1'1- to The first part of the data form notes background information. This information includes the outfall ID, inspection date, inspection time, temperature, inspector name, previous 72 hours precipitation, and land use. 3, Ouffallll II:::) scii ilpfloin The second part of the data form describes the outfall. Outfall descriptors such as closed and open drainage, type of material (i.e., reinforced concrete, corrugated metal, polyvinyl chloride, high density polyethylene, steel, or clay/drain tile), outfall shape (i.e. elliptical, box, round), dimensions, and the amount of the culvert that is submerged. 3,w:3 �,LAfallll C;Iha iracteirli>flcs The third part of the data form addresses outfall characteristics including outfall damage, deposits, stains, abnormal vegetation, poor pool quality, and algae. Even if there is no flow during the time of the inspection, corroding or stained pipes, and dead vegetation are potential _5 II Page I as ^G n,pge. II LAGE 1,: MOUN°T PR0SP1I: T 20170k J1 TFALI nqs i:_:, `r N REPORT T indicators of illicit discharges from direct or indirect (dumping) sources. After the physical conditions of the outfall are inspected, the likelihood of an illicit discharge is assessed. 1; , °'llili� all Il lydlirataliww; for If:::::'ll .w�vlilr��. : ��itf� llll : Physical indicators of a potential illicit discharge include odor, turbidity, color, stains, abnormal vegetation, pipe algae, and flow. If any of the physical indicators are present, a description of the indicator is selected on the form and additional comments regarding the indicator are noted in the comments section. The following is a description of physical pollutant indicators that are used during the site inspection (adapted from New Hampshire Estuaries Project and the IDDE Guidance Manual by the Center for Watershed Protection). Water is a neutral medium and does not produce odor; however, most organic and some inorganic chemicals contribute odor to water. Odor in water may originate from municipal and industrial waste discharges, from natural sources such as decomposition of vegetative matter, or from associated microbial activity. Table 1: Odor or Potential Illicit Discharges u � I it IIL IIII II IIII VIII VIII.IIII IIII VIII 1111111 IIII IIII ILUIf I I I II V U II UI I I ltll I U I I IU UI l �� ., .� ��UIIIIIIIIIIIII IIII�I III�� IIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIII�II11i IIIIIIIIIIIIIID IIII IIIIII��IIIIII�IIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIII��) Sewage Wastewater treatment facilities, domestic waste connected into storm drain, failing septic system. Sulfide (rotten eggs) Decaying organic waste from industries such as meat packers, dairies, and canneries. Rancid/sour Many chemicals, including pesticides and fertilizers, emit powerful odors that may produce irritation or stinging sensations. Petroleum/gas Industry associated with vehicle maintenance or petroleum product storage; gas stations. Laundry Laundromat, dry cleaning, and household laundry. 2 11 u..aiuWblidt. Turbidity is a measure of the clarity of water. Turbidity may be caused by many factors, including suspended matter such as clay, silt, or finely divided organic and inorganic matter. Turbidity is a measure of the optical properties that cause light to be scattered and not transmitted through a sample. The presence of turbidity is assessed by comparing the sample to clean glass sample container with colorless distilled water. Turbidity and color are related terms but are not the same. Turbidity is a measure of how easily light can penetrate through the sample bottle, whereas color is defined by the tint or intensity of the color observed. Color is a numeric computation of the color observed in a water quality sample, as measured in cobalt-platinum units. Both industrial liquid wastes and sewage tend to have elevated color values. Unfortunately, some "clean" flow types can also have high color values. Page 6 I ill LAGE 1:: MOUN°T PR0SP1: T 20170k J1 TFAU nqs i:_:, `r N REPORT T Table 2: es olor of Potential Illicit Discharges g ui ui ui «« uu uuuu ii iii uo uui 1 � I U ll11411111 Illll l VIII VIII II III . VIII VIII VIII...ill IIII i 111111 IIII II VIII lull l l I IU IU I UI I Ill 1 I IU II I Illi II ( I l l SII � IIIII�IIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIII�IIII�IUIIII�IIIIII�IIIIIIIII�UIIIIIIIIIIU�llllllllll��lll�� III��IIIIIIII�U�IIIIIII��III�I��IIIIII�II��IIIIIIIIIIII��IIIIIIII�I�IIII�III��III�IIIIUIIIIII�I�IIIIIII�UIIII��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII) Brown Water: Water ranging in color from Human causes may be eroded, disturbed soils from light-tea to chocolate milk; it may have a construction sites, animal enclosures, destabilized stream rotten egg odor. banks, and lake shore erosion due to boat traffic. Yellow Water May include textile facilities, chemical plants, or pollen. Gray Water: Water appears milky and May be illicit connections of domestic wastewater, untreated may have a rotten egg smell and/or soap septic system discharge, and parking lot runoff. odor. There may also be an appearance of cottony slime. Green Water: Ranging from blue green to Human causes may be over-fertilizing lawns, dye, or bright green color and may impart odor. discharging poorly treated wastewater. Conditions typically occur from May to October. Orange/Red May include meat packing facilities or dyes. Green Flecks: Resembling floating blue- Human cause is excessive nutrients. Fertilizers used on green paint chips or grass clippings. lawns can contaminate surface and ground water. Green Hair Like Strands: Bright or dark Excessive nutrients from fertilizers or septic systems. green, resembling cotton candy and often in floating mats. Multi-Color Water: Various or uniform Human causes include oil or hazardous waste spill, paint color, other than brown, green, or gray. For and paint equipment rinsed into storm drains, or into failing rainbow sheen see floatables. septic systems. 3 4 4 1::::::llotal Iles The presence of sewage, floating scum, foam, oil sheen, or other materials can be obvious indicators of an illicit discharge. If the floatable appears to be sewage, a severity score of three is automatically assigned since no other source looks quite like it. Suds are rated based on their foaminess and staying power. A severity score of three is designated for thick foam that travels many feet before breaking up. Natural foam breaks apart easily, can be brown, black, or yellowish and may smell fishy or musty. Surface oil sheens are ranked based on their thickness and coverage. In some cases, surface sheens may not be from oil discharges, but instead created by in-stream processes. Petroleum sheens don't break apart and quickly flows back together. See Figure 2. P I a: f; e ��UI�UIUIDI I as ^G n,pge. ill,,, °QUI 1:� U „T �a��' ��QI, � 20170k J1 TFAL I,,,,, nq m V:_:' `„r �� REPORT � ORT Figure 2 Natural Sheen Versus Synthetic I, .Is , II I,.. I uuu ,nl iniii _ uuuu iuVVVVVVV �� II i SII h WtiII@II I' iiil illll 'nµ li Ilo, i � uuli I �� III I I IIIIIIII II � "1 `m Natural sheen from bacteria forms a swirl-like Synthetic oil forms a swirling pattern. film that cracks if disturbed. Table 3: Floatables in Potential Illicit Discharges Uuu Uui I I UI U I p I IIIII111111WllllllillllllllVIIIII IIIIIII11111111111111111111111111 IU � SII ( III I LIIII 011 III�IIIII�IIII Illllllll�lllllllllllll�llllllllll�llllillllllUl�lllllllllllll�lllllllll�lllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Illlllllll�lllllllllllllilllll�lll�llllllll�llllllllll�lllllll��lllllllllllllllllllllllllll Sewage Human causes include connection of domestic wastewater, leaking sanitary sewers, and failing septic systems. Suds and Common human causes of unnatural foam include leaking sewer lines, improper sewer Foam connections to storm sewers, and detergents from car washing activities. Petroleum Human causes may include leaking underground storage tank or illegal dumping. (oil sheen) Grease Common human causes include overflow from sanitary systems (due to clogging from grease) and illegal dumping. 13 5 CIl'--eu licall I1::::1ollllu1alnt Ilindlica k:)II's Of"' Il 1OW111111g Oa tfalllls If the outfall inspection identifies a potential illicit discharge, grab samples are collected at the outfall and taken to a laboratory for chemical analysis. Common chemical pollutant indicators include the following: 3,5.1 aJrr Ir n o Ii I I amn Ammonia is a good indicator of sewage, since its concentration is much higher in sewage than in groundwater or tap water. High ammonia concentrations (>50 mg/1) may also indicate liquid wastes from industrial sites. Challenges include the potential generation of wastes from non- human sources, such as pets or wildlife. 3.5.2 Ih�louiuMne Chlorine is used throughout the country to disinfect tap water, except where private wells provide the water supply. Chlorine concentrations in tap water tend to be significantly higher than most other discharge types. Unfortunately, chlorine is extremely volatile, and even moderate levels of organic materials can cause chlorine levels to drop below detection levels. Because chlorine is non-conservative, it is not a reliable indicator, although if very high chlorine levels are measured, it is a strong indication of a water line break, swimming pool discharge, or industrial discharge from a chlorine bleaching process. Page ��UI�UIUIUII I as ^G n,pge. 20170k J1 TFAU nqs V:_:, `r �� REPORT POI T 3.5.3II,)II,eir Concentrations of copper in dry-weather flows can be a result of corrosion of water pipes or automotive sources (e.g. radiators, brake lines, and electrical equipment). The occurrence of copper in dry-weather flows could also be caused by inappropriate discharges from facilities that either use or manufacture copper-based products. A copper value of>0.025-mg/L indicates an industrial discharge is present. Industrial sources of copper include the following • Copper manufacturing (smelting) • Analytical laboratories • Copper metal processing/scrap • Power plants remelting • Electronics • Metal plating • Wood preserving • Chemicals manufacturing • Copper wire production 3.5. [,.)eteir eir,its Most illicit discharges have elevated concentration of detergents. Sewage and wash water discharges contain detergents used to clean clothes or dishes, whereas liquid wastes contain detergents from industrial or commercial cleansers. The nearly universal presence of detergents in illicit discharges, combined with their absence in natural waters or tap water, makes them an excellent indicator. 3,5 5 C:::::... c6h, II:::::::nteirococ&i, and ICotdl Cdhforin Each of these bacteria is found at very high concentrations in sewage compared to other flow types, and is a good indicator of sewage or seepage discharges, unless pet or wildlife sources exist in the sub-watershed. Overall, bacteria are good supplemental indicators and can be used to find "problem" streams or outfalls that exceed public health standards. 3,5.6 f°::]LJ ..nirJ e Fluoride, at a concentration of two parts per million, is added to drinking water supplies in most communities to improve dental health. Consequently, fluoride is an excellent conservative indicator of tap water discharges or leaks from water supply pipes that end up in the storm drain. Fluoride is obviously not a good indicator in communities that do not fluorinate drinking water, or where individual wells provide drinking water. Fluoride levels greater than 0.6-mg/L indicate a potable water source is connected to the storm water system. 3,5.7 I:::)he i nd Phenol is a commonly occurring chemical and can be found in foods, medicines, and cleaning products, as well as industrial products and by-products. Generally, the appearance of phenols in storm water would indicate a misconnected industrial sewer to a storm drain or ditch. Exceptions would include runoff from treated wood storage yards (e.g., treated lumber and telephone poles) and improper disposal (flash dumping) of cleaning products. A phenol value greater than 0.1-mg/L indicate an illicit discharge is present. Industrial sources of phenol include the following: • Chemical manufacturing (organic) • Resin manufacturing • Textile manufacturing • Tire manufacturing • Paint and coatings manufacturing • Plastics fabricating • Metal coating • Electronics 9 1 Page I as ^G n,pge. 20170k J1 TFAU nqs V:_:' `r �� REPORT POI T • Oil refining and re refining 0 Iron production • Pharmaceutical manufacturing • Ferro-alloy manufacturing • Paint stripping Other sources of phenol include improper handling and disposal of cleaning compounds by institutions such as hospitals and nursing homes. Most discharge flow types are neutral, having a pH value around 7, although groundwater concentrations can be somewhat variable. pH is a reasonably good indicator for liquid wastes from industries, which can have very high or low pH (ranging from 3 to 12). The pH of residential wash water tends to be rather basic (pH of 8 or 9). Although pH data is often not conclusive by itself, it can identify problem outfalls that merit follow-up investigations using more effective indicators. 3.! .9 f,,.'[ia qphoiruis Phosphorus is recognized as the controlling factor in plant and algae growth Small increases in phosphorus can fuel substantial increases in aquatic plant and algae growth. In addition to reducing the recreational use of the water body, the increased plant and algae growth lowers dissolved oxygen levels. Low dissolved oxygen levels often result in the death of certain fish, invertebrates, and other aquatic animals, reduced recreational use, property values, and public health. A key source of phosphorus comes from polluted storm water runoff, such as rain or melting snow washing over fertilized areas or manure. 3 5.19 1::::'otasslit..iu r'n Potassium is found at relatively high concentrations in sewage, and extremely high concentrations in many industrial process waters. Consequently, potassium can act as a good first screen for industrial wastes, and can also be used in combination with ammonia to distinguish wash waters from sanitary wastes. An ammonium to potassium ratio of>1 or<1 indicate waste water or wash water discharge respectively. A potassium value of>20-mg/I is a good indicator for industrial discharges. 3 511 &..j it fa:alta ants Surfactants are the active ingredients in most commercial detergents and are typically measured as Methyl Blue Active Substances (or MBAS). They are a synthetic replacement for soap, which builds up deposits on clothing over time. Since surfactants are not found in nature, but are always present in detergents, they are excellent indicators of sewage and wash waters. The presence of surfactants in cleansers, emulsifiers, and lubricants also makes them an excellent indicator of industrial or commercial liquid wastes. A surfactant value of> 0.25-mg/L within residential areas indicates that either a sewage or wash water is present in the stormwater; a value of>5-mg/L within non-residential areas indicates that there is an industrial discharge. Non lllllliclit Il:::1lischairge Coinceiru°is Any problems or unusual features noted at the outfall are included at the end of the data form. This section is also used to record if the outfall appears to be potentially impacted by inappropriate discharges, even if no flow is observed. I as ^G n,pge. 20170k JI TAD DI,,,,, nq m VI,,;;; `„r �� REPORT � ORT ,U., �” If:::°��Illl��w SII°) Ilu u°�e,,�tiigatlioin Follow up inspections are required for outfalls identified to have potential illicit discharges during the outfall inspection procedure. No potential illicit discharges were observed during the 2017 inspection. 3 8 Inspection Su iryumaii, Table 4 provides a summary of the outfalls inspected in 2017. None of the outfalls are recommended for follow-up investigation or maintenance. 4-1 O O O O O O v O O N O O N O O O O v O O O O O O O O v N N bA O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ra L + O N ra v > c v f LA L 41 N OO u O O L O O O O O O O O O O -a OO O O X O O O O O O O O O O C C m O O C O C C C C C C 0 C C C Ll w C C C C C C C C C C N N x O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LU C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c N 0) N N O c c c c c J J J J J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 2 O O O C C C U- C U- Ll C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C U- C C � C C C OO Q Ul) N _Q 0 0 � L L v O O \bZ U U C w w bA bA w U Q Q Q Q Q L _Q _Q _Q _Q _Q U L L L L L \ \ \ \ \ \ bA C_ to to to bD to Q U U U U U ra ra ra ra ra Otl\A O U.0 M O b\.0 w O C O • In � C p •C C L L L _ L ra L ra ra L ra ra O O O O O Q O O O O Q O O O O O O O O Q O Q Q O O O O O O C C C V C N C C C V to C C C C C C C C to V N to C C C C C C N _N _N N _N N _N N N N E mo to bQ W to bA to bA 00 bA by m bA to W bA w bA bA bA bA bA by bA by bq bqFW 7Eb C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 3 in in in in in in V) in in in in in in in in in in in V) in in in in in in in in in in L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L U U U U U U V U V V U V U U U U U U U U U U V U U U U U U ^ L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L y U U U U U U V U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U V U C 3 0 d d d d d d U d d d d d d V d d U d d d d d d d d UU U V U U > U U U U U U > U U > U I-u U U U U U U U = = = oc = U a a oc a U U rn oc cl:� cl:� m ca ~ N N 00 N MM M M M M M M M ry)M M � � V) V) ll) LIl v) Ln Ln w v av av v a� v O v U U v U O O O O N O v O O v O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N N bA O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C C C C O O C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N V) N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O X O O O c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c LU c c c c c c c c J J J J J O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 2 O O C C C C C C C C C L.L C C U- C C C C C C C C C C C C LL LL C LL C C bA w CC Q Q L L \ \ bA bA C C Y Y U U \ \ bA bA C C f9 fB Q O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N C C C C C C C C C N C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N OJ OJ OJ N N N N N N N N N N OJ OJ N OJ N N N N N N N N — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — bA bA w bQ M ) tw bA to bA w w b0 bA bA on w bA bA w w bA b0 w by bA w w M w b0 C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in in L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — U u U U U u u U U U U U U U U u U U U U U U t.) U U U U U U U U L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U �! I a- .N U U U U U U U U U � U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U / U / UCr G lD I� � � 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 al a) m a) a) a) a) a) 0 0 0 0 O O O av a� v v v v p U 41 41 L O O O O O O O O O C) O O O N O C C C C � C � � � � C � C A �• J• C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L _p O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O U v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o x 0 0 0 0 c C c c - 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 W c c c 4- S O O O O O O O O O O O O O ca O O O C O C C O C O O O O C O O d O O C bA bA C Q Cl Q Q L L OA OA C C v Y U U \ \ OA bA O C f0 f9 O O Q O O Q O O O O O O O O O O 0 N N Op OA OA OA OA w OA OA Q bA OA M 7 Q Z3 M C C C C C C •L C C C p 0 C in in in in in in in ul H in in in O in L L L L L L L L L L L L L co f6 f0 fII C6 l0 f6 fD f6 f6 f0 C6 (D f6 U (0 m 4- M = U L.) U U u U U U U U U U U QU U X L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L O V C) V C) u U u V V V U V U w V V co �! I CL U CL a- a- CL a- CL a- CL a- a- a- C #" V V > u U u V u V U u U u u V O DC U cr- d cr- = CIC cc 1= OC OC oC c ul w w m O 't w r� w c-I c I c I c I N N M cN-I cN-I cN-I cN-I cN-I I � mm APPENDIX A STORM WATER OUTFALL INSPECTION DATA FORM Village of Mount Prospect Outfall Inspection Data Form Section 1: Background Data Watershed: Outfall ID: Date: Time: Temperature: hispector(s): Previous 48 Hours Precipitation: Photos Taken(Y/N) If yes,Photo Numbers: Land Use in Drainage Area(Check all that apply): ❑Industrial ❑Residential ❑Commercial Other: Known Industries: ❑Open Space ❑Institutional Section 2: Outfall Description LOCATION MATERIAL SHAPE DIM E N>ONS SUBMERGED ❑RCP ❑CMP ❑Circular ❑ Single In Water: ❑PVC ❑HDPE ❑No ❑Elliptical ❑Double Diameter/ ❑Partially Storm Sewer ❑ El Fully Steel Dimensions: (Closed Pipe) ❑Box ❑Triple With Sediment: ❑Clay/drain tile ❑No ❑Other: ❑Other ❑Partially ❑Other: ❑Fully ❑Trapezoid Depth: Open drainage ❑Concrete (swale/ditch) ❑ ❑ El rip-rap Other; El Parabolic Top Width: ❑Other: Bottom Width: Section 3: Physical Indicators INDICATOR CHECK if Present DESCRIPTION COMMENTS Outfall Damage ❑ ❑Spalling,Cracking or Chipping ❑ Peeling Paint ❑Corrosion Deposits/Stains ❑ ❑Oily ❑Flow Line ❑Paint ❑Other: Abnormal Vegetation ❑ ❑Excessive ❑Inhibited Poor pool quality ElElOdors El Colors El Floatables El Oil Sheen El Suds ❑Excessive Algae ❑Other: Pipe algae/growth ❑ ❑Brown ❑Orange ❑Green ❑Other: Do physical indicators suggest an illicit discharge is present(Y/N): Flow Present? ❑Yes ❑No If No,Skip to Section 5 and Close Illicit Discharge Investigation Flow Description ❑Trickle ❑Moderate ❑ Substantial Section 4: Physical Indicators(Flowing Outfalls Only) INDICATOR CHECK if DESCRIPTION RELATIVE SEVERITY INDEX(1-3) Present ❑Sewage ❑Rancid/sour Odor El El Sulfide ElPetrolrnam/gas El 1—Faint E:1 2—Easily ❑3—Noticeable from a detected distance ❑Other: ❑Clear ❑Brown Color Gra Yellow 1—Faint colors in sample El 2 e Clearly El El ❑ ❑ p visible in sample ❑3—Clearly visible in ❑Green ❑Orange bottle outfall flow El Red El Other: bottle Turbidity ❑ See severity ❑ 1—Slight cloudiness ❑2—Cloudy ❑3—O a ue Floatables ❑Sewage ❑Suds ❑ 1—Few/slight;origin not ❑2—Some- -Does Not ❑ ❑Petroleum(oil sheen) obvious indications of origin ❑3-Some;origin clear Include Trash!! ❑Grease ❑Other: Do physical indictors(flowing)suggest an illicit discharge is present(Y/N): Section 5: Any Non-Illicit Discharge Concerns(e.g.,trash or needed infrastructure repair Instructions for completing the Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form Strike out incorrect entries with a single line; correct values or descriptions are written above or near the struck-out entries. Do not use a new data entry form to correct an incorrect entry. At the completion of each outfall inspection, the field crews are responsible for ensuring that a Storm Water Outfall Inspection Data Form has been completely and correctly filled out and that all data and remarks are legible. Section 1: Background Data Watershed: The ultimate receiving water from the storm water outfall inventory to be entered here. Outfall ID: Enter the outfall identification number from the storm water outfall inventory. Date: To avoid confusion, dates are be written in the following manner: DAY MONTH YEAR. For example, 10 MARCH 2007. Time: Regular time in hours minutes and am/pm(i.e 1:30 pm). Temperature: A concise description of the weather conditions at the time of the screening is to be recorded(for example, Clear, 75o F). Inspector: The name(s) of the field personnel. Previous 48 Hours Precipitation: The total amount of precipitation during the 48 hours preceding the inspection is to be noted(for example, none-72 Hours or 0"=4 days). If the total precipitation is not known, it is appropriate to enter a qualitative assessment if the precipitation was minor. For example, Drizzle-36 Hours if appropriate. If the precipitation amount was significant, actual precipitation totals is obtained from a local rain gauge, if available. Photos Taken (Yes/No): Photographs are to be taken with a camera that superimposes a date and time on the film. The date and time should correspond to the date and time recorded on the data form. Photo Numbers: If photographs are taken, the number(s) is recorded. Land Use: Check all that apply, noting which land use is predominate. If the industrial box is checked, any known industries are listed to facilitate potential tracing efforts. Section 2: Outfall Description Type of Outfall: Storm Sewer (Closed Pipe) or Open Draina (Swale/Ditch): First check if the outfall is either from a Closed Pipe or Open Drainage. Then complete table row to describe outfall characteristics. Section 3: Physical Indicators Complete table rows describing outfall characteristics (Outfall Damage, Deposits/Stains, Abnormal Vegetation, Poor pool quality, Pipe algae/growth). This section is filled out regardless of current flow conditions. No flow during the time of the inspection, does not rule out the potential of illicit discharges. Corroding or stained pipes, dead or absence of vegetation, are potential indicators of illicit discharges from direct or indirect(i.e. dumping) sources. After inspecting the physical conditions of the outfall, the likelihood of an illicit discharge is assessed. Use this assessment in the supporting flow chart above. Flow Present(Yes/No): A Yes or No is entered here to indicate the presence or absence of dry- weather flow. If the outfall is submerged or inaccessible, "See Notes"is entered and an explanation provided in the "Notes" section. If No is entered in the "Flow Present"block, then skip to Section 5. If Yes is entered, then the remainder of the outfall screening data form is filled out. Flow Description: A description of the quantity of the dry-weather flow is provided. Sample Location: A description of the actual sampling location is to be recorded(for example, at end of outfall pipe). If the outfall is submerged or is inaccessible for sampling, an upstream sampling location may be required. A description of any upstream sampling locations is recorded here. Grab samples are collected from the middle,both vertically and horizontally, of the dry-weather flow discharge in a cleaned glass container. Samples can be collected by manually dipping a sample container into the flow. If no dry weather flow was observed and no non-flowing physical indicators appear present the inspection can be closed, skip to Section 5 of the form. If no dry weather flow was observed but indicators appear present the outfall is placed back on the follow-up inspection log to ensure future inspections of the outfall, skip to Section 5. If dry weather flow was observed (regardless of the presence of non-flowing physical indicators), complete the remainder of the form and continue to Section 4. Section 4: Physical Indicators (Flowing Outfalls Only) Complete table rows describing outfall characteristics (Odor, Color, Turbidity, Floatables). This section is filled out for flowing outfalls only. Odor: The presence of an odor is to be assessed by fanning the hand toward the nose over a wide-mouth container of the sample, keeping the sample about 6 to 8 inches from the face. Be careful not to be distracted by odors in the air. Provide a description of the odor, if present. Color: The presence of color in the discharge is to be assessed by filling a clean glass sample container with a portion of the grab sample and comparing the sample with a color chart, if color is present. If a color chart is used, the number corresponding to the color matching the sample is to be entered in this blank. Color is not assessed by looking into the discharge. Turbidity: Turbidity is a measure of the clarity of water. Turbidity may be caused by many factors, including suspended matter such as clay, silt, or finely divided organic and inorganic matter. Turbidity is a measure of the optical properties that cause light to be scattered and not transmitted through a sample. The presence of turbidity is to be assessed by comparing the sample to clean glass sample container with colorless distilled water. Describe turbidity as; • Clear, • Cloudy(translucent), or • Opaque. Floatables: The presence of floating scum, foam, oil sheen, or other materials on the surface of the discharge are to be noted. Describe of any floatables present that are attributable to discharges from the outfall. Do not include trash originating from areas adjacent to the outfall in this observation. After inspecting the physical conditions of the outfall discharge, the likelihood of an illicit discharge is assessed. If flowing physical indicators are present, the tracing procedures are implemented. Section 5: Any Non-Illicit Discharge Concerns Any problems or unusual features are to be entered here. If the outfall appears to be potentially impacted by inappropriate discharges, this can be recorded here. This section is to be completed even if no flow is observed. I l„,� W ',� �,,,,' �„ t.J1)R PEC” „ 2017 OU„TFe' I,,,I I SP Ec n0N RE F ORT APPENDIX B ILLICIT DISCHARGE FLOW CHART 0 C U oo�?' ppppJJ,,,ssrrrrrra. a�% i%SISI; aaall�1SSSS? ss � r r, sssssssssssssssssssssssssss �r J.+ it C� U O � z w M MIN i� 03 03 MSI `�"� I--i '0'0'Sltti€i€ii€ii€SSSS 4--I U %�� O I l„,� W ',� �,,,,' �„ t.JF)R PEC” „ 2017 OU„TFe' I,,,I I SP Ec n0N RE F ORT APPENDIX C OUTFALL LOCATION MAPS u�Mnap�l oan�uaxrui' ,,,,, ,-rsad�wt��nnau!rc�wr�ouaswa�n�wwmru dal,a'��rw�.�ia,o��.w s,..' mwtamw.mibdl",,wo uo _�� vAa .�i�a�u hxMzrrvmvw a w�,mr,�l�.w.udi „u�uAfawh('kF�tF 77 ONO, iaslr' � i1 ea 21 r rw+kr, �rXSS�i ri�✓s 5'Cett Wd tY.Iaw R;vd VdvC 4Fv pvi kwzurtl WJ 1 s us lv n d v I.�t A19Vy ghrtA n��rf�M11r9�IN:.:. 1 �% F a 7 s 4 i nn Ila Y f r, Ir4 i YW� �.,� n ... �sAza'w�w,n [f Ha ui r,u,rxr I :� 4ow+r�an fod Rnrm.u� Kmnxt ul rf wavvxuoa-- �`vn`vr r U v rr1 s Pk l uiylnro f naia~� 'ktld Ma rry rt HO dal P kC C (xv4 Wsrryi din u9 r I ,r, aft i P ��, a�ro�e�v . i 3.. 14 4 US 14 ii", i i r. ar US 4 lr vi tar wn as rnr+�a,.e av,.ron ", IMoi nt PM"w"aS' ect u,, ary io wnai� 1 rd di r „„!,f � w t a v�rani cer.�ei` .. oq i 8 A 3 / / f1, / r I,"II, r" lerriiff I�rnw r v°a�.lowau » f f1 U ',, CCRPetc r !A ry US n", r gat 9 11 " ; 61"al{ Y4.'4gV / l 4p Ik45� 41, 64,1 ��i✓l� d p// i1 til" " ./tri t 1' P 9y�! YDS r< �� r of�Tf a+srRrxaen wmurearaarer,ai r �D� d llr .�b I, i la✓i�f�llJ� fuww 13 IW fu ntl d;" hlyrrr�[a Read G WVx Se RIR,v�vruivnu , `r i GI Y1 MAI r, r � �idtt ro iia ui Rt�/((IP KR6 r� MI ii roan, 1r iiivF t sig iraw;� ' � �iia�rrr��rtlro 1 i • bd ars i��i�o� r f p,„ t; uP n. ," y PzXCI I �r�rrrrrrsiri N,k,lrerk� A..�" ©OpenS,treetMap(and)'contributs ors, CC-BY-SA REVISIONS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DATE: 11/14/2016 PROJECT: MPMP2.01 �I�I� — CREATED BY: MRK C:0Ph5dd11,111� '. OUTFALL INDEX MAP— m e N W V E s Source: Esri, ®igitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographies, CNE�S//airbus ��S, USS®P,, USG�S,,4eroGRl�P, IGN,and the GIS User Community REVISIONS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DATE: 11/14/2016 iio- — OUTFALL MAP PROJECT: MPMP2.01 n,„,,,,,,�,,,,�,, — SHEET IA CREATED BY: MRK -