Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/09/2019 VB Minutes5/30/2019 BoardDocs® Pro SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. (Tuesday., April 9,,2019) Generated by Karen Agoranos on Wednesday, April 10,, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order at 7:04PM 1. 1 ROLL CALL Members present: Arlene Juracek, William Grossi, Eleni Hatzis., Paul Hoefert, Richard Rogers, Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel 1.2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Trustee Rogers led the Pledge of Allegiance 1.3 INVOCATION - Mayor Juracek provided the invocation. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Village Board- April 3, 2019 Motion by Richard Rogers, second by William Grossi to approve the minutes of the April 3, 2019 Regular Meeting of the Village Board Yea: William Grossi, Eleni Hatzis, Paul Hoefert, Richard Rogers,, Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel Motion Carries 3. MAYOR'S REPORT No report COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARX' Resident Cathy Lane * Resident questioned parliamentary procedures during the April 3. 2019 Village Board meeting. 5. CONSENT AGENDA No Consent Agenda presented 6. OLD BUSINESS 6.1 PZ -20-18 / Maple Street Lofts / Nicholas & Associates / 2nd reading of an ORDINANCE GRANTING A PLAT OF SUBDIVISION,, ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS,, AND CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 301 S. MAPLE STREET, 215 E. PROSPECT AVENUE,, 225-235 E. PROSPECT AVENUE AND 232-240 E. LINCOLN STREET Mayor Juracek stated there is no additional staff report. Staff,. petitioner Nick Papanicholas and Chris Coleman of Wingspan Development were present to answer addition questions from the Board. Mr. Coleman clarified and addressed new concerns brought forward by residents at the April 3, 2019 Village Board meeting. Mr. Coleman provided the following responses: Sidewalk width to/fro m Metra platform * Typical sidewalk width is 5 feet wide; proposed new sidewalk will be 7 feet wide. Pedestrian crossin.gfi * Additional stops signs will be provided. Handicap and SUV accessibility_ Proposed parking garage will have adequate handicap parking spaces; garage will accommodate larger vehicles (Sport Utility Vehicles). Rental forecast Provided leasing statistics and demographics from Buckingham development in Des Plaines which indicate a strong rental market; Millennials cover a large cross-section of people. Walking distance to the platform from the commuter lot * Midpoint of parking lot to Metra platform is 575 feet; as a comparison, a city block is 450 feet. Several residents spoke before the Board to convey their opposition to the project regarding traffic, density and safety concerns. New concerns regarding handicap accessibility and building sustainability were discussed. Board heard comments from residents who support the project and view the development as a key component to downtown revitalization. https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 1/5 5/30/2019 BoardDocs® Pro Amy Gonzalez 703 S. Louis Ms. Gonzalez provided new concerns and suggestions to design an environmentally green building including the use of solar power, green roof designs, use of native plants, co -working spaces. Michael Schumer 402 S. Emerson 9 Concerned with density and traffic including traffic generated by delivery services Sally Cohn Lions Park Resident Density and traffic concerns; benefit in slowing down new developments until success of current developments is determined Jamie Koy 409 S. Albert •Need to distinguish between accurate and false information •Buckingham development is not an accurate comparable •Handicap accessibility Deb • •1• S.Emerson e Traffic • Resident 1207 W. Glenn Ln. * Not enough parking Karen Thompson 912 S. Williams Street * Supports growth and development; wrong location for this development John Klimick Resident • Concerned student impact numbers are inaccurate • Concerned with traffic impact on neighborhood ]on Fletcher • Feels the MSL project is being rushed; concerns with changing traffic patterns • • e MSL has divided the • Resident Opposes development and feels second reading of this ordinance should occur at the next regular meeting of the Boa rd Stan Kaniecki 603 S. Maple •Supports development and businesses but feels MSL is too dense for location • Concerned with traffic and congestion e Absence of an appraisal is a critical missing component Stan Hillstrom George St. • Questioned formula used for student impact calculation • Questioned if other developers sought out this property. Mayor Juracek responded, stating the property is owned by the petitioner except for the Village parking lot • Had questions regarding TIF; Mayor Juracek stated his questions will be addressed when the Redevelopment Agreement agenda item is discussed later in the meeting Resident Elmhurst Ave e Concerns with pedestrian safety https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 2/5 5/30/2019 BoardDocs® Pro George Clowes 604 S. Elm • Expressed concerns with the planning and zoning process • Concerned with the density of the project The followin.g residents spoke in support of the Maple Street Loft development: Eric Mau Wille Development will move the Village forward Joe Passoli Resident and local business owner • This development will attract a younger demographic that will ultimately benefit both the business community and residents Dan Novak Resident and local business owner • MSL will benefit community; density is needed to support downtown district Mark it 13 S. Owen * Location is the right place for this development Jennifer Sandoval 2019 S. Celtic Glen Drive 9 Development brings growth and change - positive for the community Mr. Coleman thanked the audience for their valuable comments. Mr. Coleman stated throughout this process, his team has made a conscious effort to listen to all stakeholders and did their best to make accommodations while maintaining the financial viability of the project. Mr. Coleman provided the followin.g in •• to questions from the Village Board and •'. • Buildings will be energy efficient and within 6 points of a LEED designation. • Illinois Building Code is stringent; follows standards of LEED certification without the cost. LEED certification is very expensive • obtain • ADA consultants will be hired to ensure the building and parking structures comply with ADA standards for accessibility and adaptability. • Existing downtown parking garage is under-utilized; sufficient downtown parking for this development including ample parking spaces designated for handicap use. • Upscale rental units are not a fad; new developments with amenities are in demand; this style of living represents a demographic change in the market • The Illinois Consulting Service formulas to determine school impact are used by municipalities and school districts across the state. • Director of Community Development Bill Cooney stated the PUD process was followed in accordance with the Village Code. Village attorney Lance Malina explained the purpose of a preliminary PUD is to give the petitioner an opportunity to financially validate a project before moving forward. Mr. Malina added not all municipalities follow the same procedures. • Options to ensure pedestrian safety will be explored. Each board member provided a closing statement before the vote was taken. Summary of Board comments: •Evolution of the downtown district was discussed; the advent of shopping malls affected downtown businesses but has rebounded; current vacancies in the downtown are minimal •Opposition of the MSL development does not mean opposition to all development • Can not assume millennials will rent these units; concerned with ability to lease the units • Retail market is changing and risky •MSL development is too dense for location •Downtown revitalization has been a constant goal for staff and Board to achieve •MSL developer is a respected local resident and high quality developer •Traffic was a concern from the beginning but trusts the traffic study; TIF funding can be used to alleviate traffic impacts •Development will attract those who will want to live, dine and eat here. Mount Prospect Millennial renters will become Mount Prospect homeowners Development will increase interest in our downtown and help the Village reach our potential as a community •Residents who provided input, suggestions and concerns were commended for it time and participation •Developer was commended for addressing resident concerns https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 3/5 5/30/2019 BoardDocs® Pro •Productive meeting generated sound ideas; food co-ops, co -working options, sustainability and enhanced safety ideas Motion by Michael Zadel, second by Richard Rogers to approve a plat of subdivision, zoning map amendment to B- r I Commercial Core., zoning map amendment to B-5 Central Commercial,, and a conditional use for a final pI anned unit development,, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Yea: William Grossi, Eleni zis, Richard Rogers,, Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel Nay: Paul Hoefert Final Resolution: Motion Carries Ordinance No. 6446 Mayor Juracek called for a brief recess at 10:22 P.M. Meeting resumed at 10:30 P.M. 7. NEW BUSINESS 7.1 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND MAPLE STREET LOFTS, LLC FOR THE MAPLE STREET LOFTS PROJECT LOCATED AT 301 S. MAPLE STREET, 215 E. PROSPECT AVENUE, 225-235 E. PROSPECT AVENUE AND 232-240 E. LINCOLN STREET Director of Community Development Bill Cooney provided an overview of the Redevelopment Agreement. MSL development will purchase approximately 1.8 acres of land from the Village for $1.6 million to consolidate the land for construction. The Village will purchase approximately .38 acres of land from MSL for $326,411 to consolidate the land for construction. Village will pay MSL approximately 2.173 million to cover the cost of storm water management improvements. Village will waive all permit fees associated with the MSL project, fee estimate is $1.6 million. Inclusion of claw back provisions that enable the Village to take back ownership of the property if the develope does not meet construction deadlines. Mr. Cooney stated the total cost of the TIF supported project expenses totals $13.1 million including the fee waiver. Geoff Dickinson of SB Friedman Development Advisors provided a TIF analysis. Mr. Dickinson provided the project scope and methodology,, MSL project overview, TIF revenue projection summary including developments costs and financing sources. Mr. Dickinson answered questions from the Board. Mr. Cassady stated Village staff engaged in several conversations and meetings with D57 staff relating to how this development will impact schools. District 57 staff stated they are comfortable with the net student impact Public Comment Resident George Street • Questioned whether the parking deck and storm water improvements are assets for the entire community versus development benefit only. • Concerns regarding transactions between developer and Village • Questioned the consistency of formulas used to calculate student impact. Mr. Dickinson stated standard multipliers, developed in 1996, are widely used by municipalities across the state and often overproduce students. Commented on TIF component relating to this project Jerry McClusky 518 S. Pine Resident and D57 School Board member • Speaking as a citizen; D57 is close to capacity; funds received will not cover capital expenditures. • Parking deck is a replacement for parking lot; and will only benefit the development Yulia Bjekic 900 Hi Lusi Ave * Questioned the need for another parking deck and questioned how the $6 million cost was derived * $1.3 million transaction was not supported by an appraisal. Mr. Cassady responded stating the land value was based on a market transaction between the Papanicholas and Parenti familes; cost is approximately $19 per square foot. Mr. Cassady added this figure is intended to keep costs reasonable so future acquisitions are not tainted by high cost of land. Waived permit fees should not be considered as free money to the Village The Village Board provided a few closing remarks. Village Attorney stated the Redevelopment Agreement is subject to final attorney review. https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 4/5 5/30/2019 BoardDocs® Pro Motion by Michael Zadel, second by Richard Rogers towaive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Final Resolution: Motion Carries Yea: William Grossi, Eleni Hatzis, Richard Rogers., Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel Nay: Paul Hoefert Motion by Michael Zadel, second by Richard Rogers to adopt the ordinance authorizing the execution of a Redevelopment Agreement between the Village of Mount Prospect and Maple Street Lofts LLC for the Maple Street Lofts project located at 301 S. Maple Street., 215 E. Prospect Avenue., 225-235 E. Prospect Avenueand 232-240 E. Lincoln Street subject to final attorney reivew. Yea: William Grossi, Eleni Hatzis, Paul Hoefert, Richard Rogers, Colleen Saccotelli,, Michael Zadel Motion Carries Ordinance No. 6447 S. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT No report 9. ANY OTHER BUSINESS None 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss., Mayor Juracek asked for a motion to adjourn. Trustee Paul Hoefert seconded by Trustee Richard Rogers moved to adjourn the meeting. By unanimous vote, the April 9., 2019, Special Meeting of the Village Board adjourned at 11:07 PM. https://go.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login# 5/5