Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/19/2019 Bid Result for four (4) LUCAS automatic chest compression devicesBoardDocs® Pro Page I of 3 Agenda Item Details Meeting Feb 19, 2019 - REGULAR MEETING OF THEM UT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 8. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Subject 8.1 Request to purchase (4) LUCAS Automatic Chest Compression Devices with FEMA AF G Grant Award Funds Access Public Type Action Preferred Date Feb 19, 2011 Absolute Date Feb 19, 2019 Fiscal Impact Yes Dollar Amount 51f880.04 Wo 0=1 • Budget Source FEMA AF G Grant Award and Operating Budget Recommended Action Approve purchase of four (4) LUCAS automatic chest compression devices from Physico Control with AFG Grant Funding for a total amount not to exceed $51,880. Village's cost match responsibility is not to exceed $4,756. Public Content I The Fire Department is requesting Village Board approval to purchase four (4) automatic chest compression devices from Physico Control for a total amount not to exceed $51,880. The purchase is possible due to the Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) that was awarded to the Fire Department in 2018. The automatic chest compression devices provide CPR compression to patients in cardiac arrest. These devices deliver continuous CPR to the patient and allow paramedics to perform other functions during a cardiac arrest. The devices have recently been approved by the Northwest Community Emergency Medical Services System (NWC EMS) for use during CPR type emergencies. At this time, the devices are not mandatory, but we anticipate that they may become mandatory in the future. The devices will be placed on all front line ambulances and the fourth device will be placed on Tower 13, thereby giving an extra set of hands to apparatus being manned with only two personnel. The Fire Department compared and reviewed the three Northwest Community Emergency Medical Services (NWC EMS) approved automatic chest compression devices. The three compression devices were the LUCAS devices (Physico Control) with a total proposal of $51,880, the ROSC-U device (Bound Tree) with a total proposal of $39,600 and the Life Line ARM (AED Professionals) device with a total proposal of $47,805. The Fire Department applied for an Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) in 2018 and was awarded funding in 2018/2019. The grant allows for the purchase of four (4) automatic chest compression devices. The funding for these devices would be from the Fire Department"s Paramedic Equipment general line item. The - •' . of these devices is 6-10 years, although it is dependent on use and maintenance. The average maintenance costs are estimated at $290 per year, per device at this time. The Fire Department"s Equipment Maintenance account would be able to absorb the additional cost of maintenance and battery replacement. No increase in either account would be expected for the future. https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 2/20/2019 BoardDocs® Pro Page 2 of 3 The Fire Department reviewed and tested the functions and features of all three chest compression devices. Based on the review, the LUCAS device (Physico Control) is being recommended for purchase based on feedback received during testing • the features• •- • 1. The LUCAS device has a proven track record and has been on the market the longest compared to the other reviewed devices. . The suction cup on the LUCAS device stabilizes the piston and helps with recoil during compression. This helps draw blood back into the heart of the patient. No other devices included this option. . LUCAS provides data feedback on compression ratio, compression rate, compression count, and a visual timeline via Bluetooth. 4. It has a smaller design when compared to other devices that will allow for easier storage on ambulance and tower ladder. . Device can be stored in an outside or inside compartment of apparatus when compared to other devices that are not allowed to be stored in outside compartments of apparatus. 6. Eight NWC EMS Fire Department's currently use LUCAS devices. LUCAS is the most commonly used compression device in the system. This allows for greater interoperability between neighboring departments with the LUCAS device. 7. LUCAS device is a two part device and rated highly on durability. Other devices had more than two parts and were not rated as high on durability. categoryThe chart below shows the different categories of the approved chest compression devices that were evaluated. Each -• - were 5 is the highestpossible rating. The totalscores- scores are recordel# supportat the bottom of the chart. The evaluation team believes that the Lucas device is the superior product and the score. -A. -ir recommendatio Product Evaluation Categories 71:*T� MTM� Maintenance Environment . - • •_ of • • •_ • Interoperability _ i Durability Function (Time to Apply to Patient) Feedback Ability StudiesClinical Battery- During Use Weight Device Cost of Product Grading- •High) Total• - • Average Score wffmammmm•-• - • •. . . . • The LUCAS chest compression system provides benefits to cardiac arrest patients by delivering consistent, high-quality chest compressions even under difficult conditions and for extended periods of time. The device will allow our team to work more efficiently without having to compromise our own safety especially during transport. The Fire Department strongly recommends purchasing the LUCAS devices (Physico Control) based on positive feedback, overall functionality, regional medical system use, and interoperability. Alternatives 1. Accept proposal from Physico Control to purchase four (4) LUCAS Automatic Chest Compression Devices for a total cost not to exceed $51,880. . Action at discretion of Village Board. https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 2/20/2019 BoardDocs® Pro Page 3 of 3 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Village Board authorize the purchase of four (4) LUCAS Automatic Chest Compression Devices from Physico Control not to exceed $51,880. The Village of Mount Prospect is responsible for an amount not to exceed $4756 with the balance coming from the FEMA AFG grant award. Funds are to be requested from FEMA when we are ready to place the order and should arrive a few weeks after that. Rhysico C&ntorl I....LJCAS.p(Jf (2,58 � f D Prof I. -ii fe [-wiginARIA.pdf (77 KB) j Y I .% I-ree ROSC pdf (44 KB) A' BOLUr soie source letter.pdf (1.1.3 KB) LJ AL -iefit Eval.pdf (1.90 KB) ItOmatic Ghest Compressi&n Devices.st pdf (63 KB) CoBe�r I— Administrative Content Executive Content https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 2/20/2019