HomeMy WebLinkAboutVB Agenda Packet 05/02/2000Next Ordinance No. 5105
Next Resolution No. 21-00
ORDER OF BUSINESS
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Mount Prospect Senior Center Tuesday
50 South Emerson Street May 2, 2000
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 7:30 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Michaele Skowron
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer Trustee Irvana Wilks
II1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Trustee Hoefert
IV. INVOCATION: Trustee Wilks
V. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2000
VI. APPROVE BILLS
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION: CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY WEEK, May 1-5, 2000
B. PROCLAMATION: MUNICIPAL CLERKS WEEK, April 30-May 6, 2000
C. PROCLAMATION: PUBLIC WORKS WEEK, May 22-26, 2000
ANY INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABILITY WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AT lO0 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, 847/392-6000, TDD 847/392-6064.
D. Request from new owner of Geht Myeul Restaurant (formerly Red A Chinese
Restaurant), 1747' West Algonquin Road, to continue operating under the
existing Class "R" (Restaurant Only) liquor license
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC
LIQUORS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit A)
This ordinance decreases the number of Class "C" (General Package) liquor
licenses by one, for Walgreens, 1010 Mt. Prospect Plaza, which will continue
to operate without the sale of liquor.
f. A RESOLUTION Of SUPPORT Of E-COMMERCE EQUITY (Exhibit B)
This resolution states the Village's opposition to extending the moratorium on
the internet, passed in the Internet Tax Freedom Act of 1998, which addresses
internet taxes and fees.
G. Appointments
VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IX. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 37-99, Phase 1B Downtown Redevelopment, Norwood Builders
(Deferred from the April 18 Village Board meeting)
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS PHASE lB OF DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT, AT THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND MAIN STREET (Exhibit C)
This ordinance grahts a Conditional Use permit for a Planned Unit Development
at the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Main Street, for 19,380 square
feet of retail space and 34 condominium units with underground and
surface parking. The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval by a
vote of 5-0.
B. PC 08-99, 1 West Rand Road
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION TO THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
1 WEST RAND ROAD (Exhibit D)
This ordinance grants an exception to the Development Code for the location
of a storm water detention facility closer to an occupied building than the
allowable twenty-five feet (25'), The Plan Commission voted 4-1 for
approval, and the Village Board voted 5-0 for approval.
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5095
ESTABLISHING A SISTER CITIES COMMISSION (Exhibit E)
This ordinance amends the ordinance that established the Sister Cities
Commission, relative to Village Trustees serving as members,
X. NEW BUSINESS
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN PROPERTY
(PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit F)
This ordinance provides for the vacation of a portion of public dght of way
located at the northeast comer of Busse Avenue and Wille Street, as part
of a purchase agreement with the adjacent land owner.
B. lStreading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN
PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TO BE SOLD AT AUCTION DURING THE ANNUAL PUBLIC WORKS OPEN
HOUSE ON MAY 20, 2000 (Exhibit G)
C. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT
BETVVEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Exhibit H)
This Resolution authorizes the Mayor to sign an agreement with IDOT for
the Rand/Euclid/Elmhurst Sidewalk Improvement Program, approved in
February, 2000.
D. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Exhibit I)
This Resolution authorizes the Mayor to sign an agreement with IDOT for
the Metra Train Station Lot Improvement Program, approved in February, 2000.
E. PUBLIC HEARING
This Public Hearing, called pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Daily Herald on April 13, 2000, as required,
is for the purpose of considering the use of a Law Enforcement Block Grant in
the amount of $16,226 for the purchase of technology or equipment related to
basic law enforcement functions.
Xl. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT '~
A. Accept proposal from Earth Tech to perform design engineering for a part of the
Weller Creek Stabilization Project.
B. Ratify reimbursement to Dr. Russel L. Skyles for expenses incurred in conjunction
with business relocation occasioned by the downtown redevelopment efforts.
C. Status Report
Xll. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XlII. CLOSED SESSION
LITIGATION: 5 ILCS 120/2 (c) (11) - "Litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on
behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or
administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in
which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the
closed meeting."
Xlll. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
APRIL 18, 2000
CALL CALL TO ORDER
TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m
ROLL CALL
ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Richard Lohrstorfer
Trustee Dennis Prikkel
Trustee Michaele Skowmn
Absent: Trustee Irvana Wilks
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PLEDGE Trustee Corcoran led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATIOI~ INVOCATION
Trustee Lohmtorfer gave the invocatior
MINUTES APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks. moved to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting held April 4, 2000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Pass: Lohrstorfer
Motion carried.
BILLS APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to approve payment of the
following bills:
General Fund $ 391,925
Refuse Disposal Fund 114,696
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund 1,329
Debt Service FUnds 168,629
Capital Improvement Fund 7,610
Capital Improvement Construction Fund
Downtown Redevelopment Const, Fund 5,417
Street Improvement Construction Fund
Flood Control Construction Fund 700
Water & Sewer Fund 258,304
Parking System Revenue Fund
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 6,661
Vehicle Replacement Fund
Computer Replacement Fund 930
Risk Management Fund 283,650
Police Pension Fund
Fire Pension FUnd
Flexcomp Trust Fund 3,023
Escrow Deposit Fund 26,640
Benefit Trust Funds
$1,269,514
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikke[, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried~
FINANCIAL FINANCIAL REPORT
REPORT Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of the
financial report for January 1,2000-March 31, 2000, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Lohrstorfer, Skowron
Nays: None .
Motion carried.
MAYOR'S MAYOR'S REPORT
REPORT: Mayor Farley welcomed Girl Scout Troops #2036 and #937, the Cadet troop and the
Brownie troop from Fairview School. The scouts presented Village Board members, the
GIRL SCOUTS Village Manager, Village Clerk, and members of the audience with spring plants, as part
of a community service project.
CHILD ABUSE Mayor Farley proclaimed the month of April as Child Abuse Prevention Month; Sue
PREVENTION Walton presented Village Board members with blue ribbons on behalf of the April Blue
MONTH Bow Campaign, for Child Abuse Prevention Month.
DAYS OF Mayor Farley proclaimed April 30-May 7 as Days of Remembrance in recognition of
REMEM- victims and survivors of the Holocaust.
BRANCE
Mayor Farley recommended the following individuals to serve on the Village Hall Task
VILLAGE HALL Force; they are responsible for making recommendations relative to the construction of a
TASK FORCE new Village Hall structure:
NAME
Jeff Brunet, Chair Resident
Jack Verhasselt Resident
Hal Ettinger Resident
Bernie Kerstein Resident
Jim Caufield Senior Advisory Council
Ann Smilanic Finance Commission
Mike Zadel Plan Commission
Brian Weinberg Chamber of Commerce
Bruce Gillilan Economic Development Commission
Alicen Prikkel Youth Commission
Jackie Hinaber Mount Prospect Public Library
Mary Lynn Bower School Distdct 57
Bill Walters Mount Prospect Park District
Dennis Prikkel Village Trustee
David Strahl Village Staff Liaison
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to approve the above
recommendations for the Village Hall Task Force.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Fadey, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Skowron
Nays: None
Abstain: Prikkel
Motion carried.
CITIZENS:
JAYCEES CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
CARNIVAL Larry Brause, representing the Mount Prospect Jaycess, asked the Village Board to
consider waiving all fees associated with their annual carnival, to be held at Mount
Prospect Plaza May 24-29, 2000.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive all fees associated with
the May 24-29 annual Jaycees carnival, at Mount Prospect Plaza.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - April 18, 2000
OLD BUSINESS , ~ .
ZBA 06-00 ZBA 06-00, 204 S. I-Oka Avehu~
204 S. I-OKA
An ordinance was presented for first reading to grant a Conditional Use permit to
AVENUE construct an unenclosed front porch that encroaches five feet (5'1 into a required front
yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval by a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved for approval of Ordinance
ORD. No. 5101:
NO. 5101
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 204 S. I-OKA AVENUE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
As part of this same case, ZBA 06-00, the petitioner withdrew his appeal of a denial by
the Zoning Board, of a request for a variation to increase the permitted lot coverage of
the subject property from 50% to 55%. The Zoning Board of Appeals had voted 3-2 to
deny the request, however, when the case was presented to the Village Board as an
appeal, the Board suggested that the petitioner revise his plans and present them at this
meeting.
With the petitioner withdrawing his appeal, Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee
Skowron, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals to
deny the lot coverage request made in ZBA 06-00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikke[, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carded.
ZBA 37-99 ZBA 37-99, Phase lB Downtown Redevelopment, Norwood Builders
PHASE 1B (Deferred from the March 22 meeting)
DOWNTOWN An ordinance was presented for second reading for a Conditional Use permit for a
REDEVELOP- Planned Unit Development at the northeast comer of Northwest Highway and Main
MENT Street.
William Cooney, Director of Community Development, asked the Board to consider
deferral of this case to the May 2 meeting, as details relative to parking for the
development still have not been finalized.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to defer ZBA 37-99 to the next
Village Board meeting on May 2, 2000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 07-00
1 E. RAND ZBA 07-00, 1 East Rand Road, CVS Pharmacy
ROAD An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would grant a Conditional Use permit
and variations for the construct'mn of a 23.880 sq. ft. multi-tenant retail building, including
a drug store with drive-through service. The Zoning Board of Appeals had recommended
approval by a vote of 50.
Page 3 -April 18, 2000
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corooran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved for approval of Ordinance
No. 5102:
NO. 5102
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1 EAST RAND ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran; Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Viltage Manager Michael Janonis noted that the ordinance for 1 E. Rand Road includes
the condition that the petitioner shall provide a landscaping easement over the north
twelve feet (12,) of the property to allow for landscaping and entranceway signage in
keeping with the overall Corrider Improvement Program.
ZBA 04-00 ZBA 04-00, 307 E. Kensington Road, Jules Hot Dogs
307 E. An ordinance was presented for first reading, which would grant a Conditional Use permit
KENSINGTON for the construction of a 2,914 sq. ft. fast food restaurant with drive through. The ZBA
ROAD had recommended approval by a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Prikkel, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5103 No. 5103:
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 307 EAST KENSINGTON ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
· Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH. 18: An ordinance was present for first reading, which would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic) of the
PARKING Village Code by authorizing parking restrictions on a portion of N. Louis Street, and along
RESTRICTIONS a portion of Prospect Avenue.
Trustee Corooran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved to waive the rule requiring two
readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Ordinance
NO. 5104 No. 5104:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE MOUNT
PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE
Page 4 -April 18, 2000
Upon roll call: Ayes: CorCOran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pfikkel, Skowron
=Nays: None
Motion carded.
NEW BUSINESS
LIONS CLUB A resolution was presented to authorize the Mount Prospect Lions Club to conduct the
FARMERS annual Farmers Market for the year 2000.
MARKET
Fred Steinmiller. Lions Club member, invited the public to attend the Farmers Market on
Sundays, from June 1 l-October 15. 2000,
RES.
NO. 18-00 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Skowron, moved for approval of Resolution
No. 18-00:
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT OF LICENSE WITH
THE MOUNT PROSPECT LIONS CLUB TO CONDUCT A FARMERS MARKET FOR
THE YEAR 2000
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH. 5: An ordinance was ;)resented for first reading, to amend Ordinance No, 5095 by stating
SISTER CITIES that a Village Board member would serve as a member of the newly established Sister
Cities Commission.
Trustees Corcoran and Skowron stated their objections to the proposed ordinance as
drafted, indicating that they did not favor any trustee having voting power as a member of
the commission; rather they preferred having that individual serve as a liaison, and be
available for solicited input and/or guidance.
Following a suggestion by 'J'rustee Hoefert that this matter be further discussed on May 2,
Mayor Farley stated that the ordinance would be presented for second reading at the
next Village Board meeting, May 2, 2000.
PC 08-99
PC 08-99, 1 W. Rand Road (Rand and Kensington Roads)
1 W. RAND The petitioner presented a request for an exception to the Development Code for the
ROAD location of a storm water detention facility, He outlined plans to construct a 17,0000
square foot retail development at the site of the former LaSalle Bank, and to locate the
storm water detention basin adjacent to the new structure.
The Plan Commission voted 4-1 to approve the petitioner's request, however, because
the Village Code requires a concurring vote of five (5) Plan Commission members, no
recommendatiOn was made to the Village Board.
In addition to stating concoms about the detention basin, and the existing problem of
"cut-through' traffic, Board members raised questions relative to the landscape design to
screen the detention basin, as it relates to the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines. The
petitioner indicated a willingness to work with staff on the landscape design, and stated
that his landscape architect is Wolff Clements, the same firm contracted with the Village
for the development of its Corridor Design Guidelines.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to approve the request of the
petitioner for aDevelopment Code exception for a storm water detention facility.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoren, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried~
Page 5 -Apd118, 2000
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the May 2 Village Board meeting.
A resolution was presented which would authorize the Mayor to sign an amended
agreement with the Illinois Department of Transportation for roadwork on Route 83 from
IDOT AMENDED Golf Road to the Northwest TollWay. The original joint agreement, approved on July 8,
AGREEMENT 1998, outlined the cost of this project, with the Village being responsible for $13,2721 to
be reimbursed by the Joint Action Water Agency (JAWA) the total cost of the project was
$16,272. The amended agreement increases the total amount to $64,734, with the
Village's portion remaining at $13,272.
RES. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved for approval of Resolution
NO. 19-00 No. 19-00:
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AN AMENDED AGREEMENT
BETVVEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Pdkkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VEHICLE A resolution was presented to amend Resolution No. 16-95, which designates individuals
STICKER FEE that are allowed free vehicle stickers.
EXEMPTIONS Following a brief discussion, TruStee Prikkel made a motion to amend the ordinance as
presented, to approve the issuance of free stickers for Village Board members. The
motion failed for lack of a second.
Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Skowran, moved for approval of Resolution
RES. No. 20-00:
NO. 20-00
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 16-95 DESIGNATING PERSONS
WHO SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM FEES FOR MOUNT PROSPECT MOTOR VEHICLE
LICENSES
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Abstain: Lohrstorfer
Motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
BID RESULTS: Village Manager Michael Janonis presented bid results for the year 2000 Street
Reconstruction Program:
STREET
PROGRAM BIDDER TOTAL BID
Arrow Road Construction Co. $2,856,940.85
Johnson Paving Co. 3,219,247.15
Plote, Inc. 3,367,812.35
ARROW Alliance Contractors, Inc. 3,911,930.85
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to concur with the
recommendation of staff to award the 2000 Street ReconstrUction Program contract to
Arrow Road Construction Company in an amount not to exceed $2,856,940.85.
Upon roll calk Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, LohrstOrfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays; None
Motion carried.
MPPD RADIO A request was presented by the Police Department, to waive the bid process to
MODEMS purchasenine (9) Motorola VRM 650 radio modems. Itwas noted that the Northwest
Page 6 - April 18, 2000
Central Dispatch System which'~eS the Village, requires the use of Motorola modems
as part of its mobile data system, making Motorola the sole vendor available for this type
of modem.
Trustee Skowron disclosed that she is an employee of Motorola. however, having
investigated the possibility of a conflict of interest, and being satisfied that none existed,
she would cast her vote for approval of this purchase.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Lohrstorfer, moved to approve the waiver of the
MOTOROLA
bid process for the purchase of nine [9) Motorola radio modems, at a total not to exceed
$25,749.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carrie¢
MPPD
LAPTOP Also, from the Police Department, a request was presented for the purchase of nine (9)
COMPUTERS Panasonic Tougt~book 27 laptop computers from CDS Office Technologies under a
current State of Illinois contract that was previously awarded through a competitive bid
process.
Trustee Lohrstorfer, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for approval of the purchase of
CDS nine (9) Panasonic laptop computers from CDS Office Technologies under the current
State contract at a cost not to exceed $35,532.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Hoefert, Lohrstorfer, Prikkel, Skowron
Nays: None
Motion carried.
STATUS Mr. Jenonis and Trustee Skowron reminded the audience of the following events:
REPORT April 21: Route 83 reconstruction detour begins
April 22: Welcome New Residents coffee
May 1: New vehicle stickers must be displayed on vehicles
May 17: Sister Cities banquet
OTHER ANY OTHER BUSINESS
BUSINESS Trustee Lohrstorfer made the suggestion that a discussion be held at a Committee of the
Whole meeting, in the near future, to discuss the use of acceptable bricks for new
buildings proposed within the Village
Trustee Corcoran noted that there will now be two Village Board members on official
Village commissions, and raised the question of flee village stickers as it might relate to
them. Mr. Janonis stated that this should be a future topic of discussion.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Page 7 -April 18, 2000
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
27-Apr-00
Cash & Invstmt Receipts Disbursements Other Cash & Invstmt
Balance 04/14/00 Per Attached Credits/ Balance
04/14/00 04/27/00 List of Bills Debits 04127/00
General Fund 9,416,205 1,288,259 364,891 10,339,573
Special Revenue Funds
Refuse Disposal Fund 1,805,213 53,820 124,883 !,734,150
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 935,352 75 182,034 753,393
Community Development BIk Grant Fund 69,627 17,098 52,529
Local Law Enfrcmt BIk Grant Fd 1997 11,623 11,623
Debt Service Funds 3,828,104 3,820 3,831,924
Capital Pro_iects Funds
Capital Improvement Fund 2,104,651 1,200 2,103,451
Police & Fire Building Construction Fund 53,433 53,433
Capital Improvement Construction Fund 178,218 178,218
Downtown Redevelopment Const Fund 369,353 254,898 57,703 566,548
Street Improvement Construction Fund 3,757,119 40,580 3,797,699
1998A Flood Control Construction Fund 4,654 4,654
Flood Control Construction Fund 1,194,659 1,194,659
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund 3,151,524 146,342 39,996 3,257,870
Parking System Revenue Fund 702,470 6,384 1,450 707,404
Internal Service Funds
Vehicle Maintenance Fund 163,706 139 30,704 133,141
Vehicle Replacement Fund 5,122,544 229,803 4,892,741
Computer Replacement Fund 236,403 236,403
Risk Management Fund 2,775,083 156,648 77,737 2,853,994
Trust & Aaencv Funds
Police Pension Fund 31,566,960 15,515 9,809 31,572,666
Fire Pension Fund 32,488,823 12,630 10,504 32,490,949
Flexcemp Trust Fund 17,242 8,680 11,187 14,735
Escrow Deposit Fund 1,408,065 26,953 13,230 1,421,788
Benefit Trust Funds 102,691 102,691
101,463,722 2,014,743 1,172,229 102,306,236
~PORT: AP8OARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:00 DUN: THURSDAY AUN2700 13:24 PAGE 1
RELRASE ID :
VILLAGE OF M00~? PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TRS: BOARD OF TRUSTEES ROM APRIL 14 0000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DER ~NDOR HUR VEHUOR NAME · INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
NON-DEPARTi~NTAL
02941 ACRERMAM, DANIEL R. FLEX COMP 305.10
01042 ADAMCZYK, TED D. FLEX COMP 30.46
04861 AICBER, ROBERT REFUND 5.00
02016 ARC DISPOSAL CC~PARY MARCB COLLECTIONS 13761.00
02901 BLUE, MICRAEL FLEX COMP 416.68
04862 BRAUN, PAOL REFUND-CAR SOLD 36.00
04863 BRtTTON III, ~ILLIAM ANFUND 24.00
02948 BRUNRSR, II~NA 5EX COMP 500.00
04672 BROUN, 8T~VE FLEX COMB 928.00
03760 8URE8, PA~ FLEX COMP 539.37
01038 CARNEY, ~ORSUN ~ COMP 106.70
04864 C~BXPAGN~, MAURICB REad, lO-CAR SOLD 38.00
04860 CHILDS, SUARON ~T~ REFOND 53.91
WATEX REVIleD 5.80
01.71
01102 CITIBANK, N.A. INS C~ALXS 12061.51
INS CLAIMS 95.00
10156.51
01118 CLERK OF TEE CIRCUIT CO~R~ PAYROLL FOR - 042000 700.00
RAY~OLL FOR- 042000 190.00
890.00
04853 C~OVER SIGNS RSUNND 100.00
04867 COZIHU, MARK REfuND 60.00
01224 DAI~Y, JAMICE a. FLEX COMP 71.00
01241 DAW~UN, HENRY C. FLEX COMP 68.85
04866 DEI~%NANY, BRSIL;{ ~ATER-REFUND 12.92
~T8R-RE~ND 1.36
14.28
01259 DHUTSCUNA~N, TREUN M. ~ COMP 577.04
01334 ~%I~*WUNT~, DO~GI~S R. 5~ C~? 489.00
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: TNORSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 2
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FRUN APRIL I4 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DEPT VENOOR RNR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
04840 EVANS, MARGARET FL~X CUNP 232.18
04841 EVANS, RALPH FLEX CUNP 690.49
04868 FEELEY, JOHN RE~JND-SENIOR RATE 24.00
01382 F~LTEN, BARBARA L. FLEX COMP 45.81
FLEX COMP 51.69
97.50
00102 FIRE PENSION ~ND RAY~OLL FOR - 042000 12188.81
00121 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO SAVINGS BONDS 450.00
01418 FLORY, JAMES M. FLEX CC~P I25.00
01484 GIBSON, ROBERT J. FLEX CC~P 439.00
01541 GUTIERRSZ, JULIE M. FLEX COMP 188.00
01557 HAMNRNAM, nESTER A. FLEX CUNP 164.90
04728 HOSKINSUN, TNC~AS FLEX COMP 162.20
00106 IC~A RETI~ TRUST - 401 PAYROLL FOR - 042000 316.93
00107 ICMA RETIREi~ENT TRUST - 457 PAYROLL FOR - 042000 15496.87
00108 ILLINOIS DEPANTiqJ;T OF REVENUE PAYROLL FOR - 042000 16599.47
00109 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT PAYROLL FOR - 042000 237.00
01044 ILLINOIS ~TATE DIBBURSUNF~T UNIT PAYROLL FOR - 042000 300.00
PAYROLL FOR - 042000 I4.63
PAYROLL FOR - 042000 519.23
PAYROLL FOR - 042000 195.50
PAYROLL FOR - 042000 126.00
PAYROLL NOR - 042000 60.00
1215.36
04869 KALUNJAIN, PJCHAR~ RE~JND CAR SOLD 36.00
04870 KUNTLER, PJCHARD HAMDFOAP PklTRS 36.00
01844 KRUPA, PRAMK M. FLEX C~P 28.00
04871 LI~ZAROTTO, LINDA ~ATER ~FUND 32.30
MATER REFUND 3.40
35.70
04872 ~REW~KI, BERNARD ~FUND SR.RATE 24.00
01942 MAICOAM, JOHN J. ~%EX CC~ 111.18
~RERORT: APEOARDRPT GEME~TED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RuN: TRORSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 3
RELEASE IU :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESFETED TO THE BOAN0 OF TRUSTEES FEOM APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DEPT VEN~R NBR , VDIDOR N~ IROOICE DESCRIPTION ANOUN?
00116 METRO FEDERA~ CREDIT ~ION PAYROLL FOR - 042000 250.00
00117 METROPOLITAN ALLIANCE - POLICE PAYROLL FOR - 042000 555.00
02034 MILLER, JANES FLEX COMP 477.80
04873 MOELLEF~ANP, E~IL & HARVEY WATER MEFU~D 3.23
WATER REFUND 0.34
3.57
04874 MOLIERE, PHYLLIS OVERPAYME~;T 36.80
02054 MORGAN, NANCYLOU M. F~EX COMP 51.74
FL~X COMP 85.29
137.03
02078 ~. PETER'S BANQUETS SYLVIA'S BANQUET 696.11
04875 NEE, TIMOTHY MOVING OU~ OF VILLAGE 72.00
04877 NEWGAND, M.H. WATER REFUND 16.15
WATER REFUND 1.70
17.85
04876 NGUYEN, NGAT REF~WD PERMIT FEE 30.00
02228 OAN~O~ PAVILLtON HEALTHCARE HOME DELOVERED ME,%LS 1300.00
04878 O~SON, ~D TRUCK SOLD 54.00
02278 REVLOCK, 'RONALD W. FLgX COMP 713.60
00123 PEROCO PAYROLL DR - 042000 17258.53
04879 PEPSI COt~ G~ERAL BOTTLERS OV~RPAY~T 238.00
00124 POLICE RENSION FUND PAYROLL FOR - 042000 14906.53
02962 RED{~OOD AR. PANTNERS WAT~ ~FOND 77.52
WATER REFUND 8.16
85.68
04880 ROTR, ~OLA OVEROAY~A~IT 200.00
04889 ~LARO~ CO. OVERi~-REFUND 373.43
04673 SAN EE~NA~DINO C()~T¥ CWILB ROP~O{~ PA~{E3TR PAYRO~ FOR - 042000 211.85
04081 SAGO, E~IC OWR~AY~t~ 2.00
02508 ROROLTZ, WALT~ A FLEX COMP 250.69
RE~RT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58r RUN: TBURSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 4
~LEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS P~SENVED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DEPT ~NDOR NBR ~]~N~R NME INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT :
................................................. m ............................................................................... ./.
04082 SC~AGER, TRACY ~FUND-MOVED TO CHICAGO 36.00
02514 SCHWA~T, ALA~ REPL.CK 14422 144.67
00125 SEIU LOCAL 73 PAYROLL FOR - 042000 513.50
02530 SE~KIU, MICHAEL J. FLEX CUNP 124.00
04883 SHETB, ~JENDk~ R~ND-MOVING TO PALATINE 72.00
04160 SRINDINGSRUOM SCOTT FLEX COMP 242.00
FLEX COMP 1.80
243.80
02635 STEWARD, DA~E R. FLEX COMP 143.63
04884 OTOMELL, ROBERT ~FUND-SENIOR RATE 24.00
02644 STRA~L, DAVID FLEX COMP 571.43
04886 T~PTROL BEATING & AC INC TRUCK WAS SOLD 54.00
04472 TEXOM PETROLE~ CO DIESEL 8274.92
GAS 9437.98
17712.90
02689 TBI~ DISTRICT CIRCUIT COMKT BOND MO~EY 3080.00
BOND MONEY 2627.00
BOND MONEY 1000.00
BOND MONEY 950.00
7657.00
02710 TRACY, RICF~%~D L. FLEX C~P 332.68
02729 TR~TY, CHRIS J. Flf~X C~P 291.90
00127 ~NITED way PAYROLL FOR - 042000 432.88
00128 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYROLL FOR - 042000 17566.64
DEP ~ TO TRUST FUND 72.00
REFUND-UNINC.MP 36.00
DtSB~RSUN~ 3000.00
DISBU~E~ENT 200.00
21674.64
04314 VILLAGE OF ~ PROSPEC~ - FAYROLL ~I~S PAYROLL FOR - 042000 39.80
PAYROLL FOR - 042000 135889.08
PAYROLL ~ - 042000 19138.81
PAYROLL FOR - 042000 12854.40
167922.09
02853 WE~DERITCH, ~DALL C. F~EX COMP 1102.01
REPORT: REEOARDRET GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 REN: THURSDAY AP~2700 13:24 PAGE 5
~REARE tD :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BO,~B OF TRUSTEES FRUN APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
...................................................................................................................................
DEBT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DRSCRIPTION AMOUNT
...................................................................................................................................
04885 WILLIAMS, RAGAIL OVERPAYMENT 18.00
02880 WILAMING, TECMAS M. FLEX COMP 538.78
02887 WISNIE~SKI, DONALD a. FLEX COMP 590.00
TOTAL : 337541.16
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION
04843 A~ZENIMER'S A$SDOIATION ME~ORIAL-B.WHITLOUN 50.00
04891 MT.FROSPEOT FRIENDS OF TEE LIBRARY DONATION-NIPPER 75.00
02238 ON TIME ~ESBENGER SENVICE DELIVERY 29.00
02301 PETTY CASE - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 51.15
MISC EXPENSES 92.2I
MISC EXPENSES 24.26
167.62
TOTAL : 321.62
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
03901 3ONA ENTRY FRE-AWAMD 240.00
01049 CON GOVEB~%IENT, INC HUB 535.49
00306 CLINGER, ROBENTA REFUND 40.00
01445 FUJITEN BUSINESS C(1~9{. SYSTENS MAINTENANCE 8985.00
04748 IONA ANNUAL D~ES 897.00
00353 JAMONIB, MICRAE5 E. LUNCH MEETING 30.20
LUNCH MEETING 37.61
67.81
02154 ~ETWORK SOLUTIUNS ENC REGISTRATION 35.00
02155 NEMTEL C(~94~]NtCATtuNS SUPPLIES 208.00
04274 NPELRA S~VlCE 380.00
02301 PETTY CAUN - FINANCE DEPT. MIEC EXPERSRS 32.85
MISC E](PENRES 17.38
50.23
02315 PIUNRER PRESS SUN$C~F~ION MEMEWAL 14.95
02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ~OSTAG~-MEW~IAL'TER 2809.07
02821 VON B~REEN, ~RTELL&ROP~,S .C. BER~I~ 11006.10
REPORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY APR2700 13:04 PAGE 6
RELEXSH ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF RILLS PRESSED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES F~O~ APRIL t4 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
UHPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAIVE INVOICE OESCRI~TION k~OUNT
TOTAL 20268.65
TV SERVICES DIVISION
01099 CIRCUIT CITY STO~ES ~3115 TV SETS 479.98
04846 EBAY INC. AUCTION 17.38
02155 NEXTEL C(~N ICAT IONS SUPPLIES 208.00
PHONE SERVICE 291.84
499.84
02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DER. MISC EXPENSES 22.32
04852 UNITED AD LABEL VCE TAPE LABLES 324.06
02800 VIDEO I~GES, INC. INV ~6365 172.00
VCE RENTAL 100.00
272.00
1616.38
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
01230 DANTNEXL CORPORATIO~ NEWSLETTER SUB 196.00
02238 ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE DELI~RY 27.00
TO?Al 223.00
FINASCE DESANTMENT
01056 C~RAl CONTINEN'~AI EA~ERY CAKE 75.15
01340 E~ASSY COFFEE SERVICE COFFEE & SUPP 76.11
02301 RETRY CASH - FINANCE DER. MISC EXPENSES 10.80
TO?At 162.06
C~ITY DEVELOPMENT
00309 COONEY, I'/ILLIAN J. TRAVEL EXPENSES 908.61
01222 DAILY HERALD CLASSIFIED AD 482.79
01377 ENDEK%t EXPOSE CO~ AI~ILL 83.46
00345 EXNNI~KAN, LENT~ A. REIME 111.60
IDPH S~INAN 16.17
127.77
D1979 MCI ~I~LE~S S~t/ICE 61.66
SERVICE 190. lO
SERVICE 75.00
326.76
E~HUNT: AFEOARUNPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY APES700 13:24 PAGE 7
REL~RSE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DE~T VENDOR HUR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DRSCRLFtION AMOUNT
.......................... ? ........................................................................................................
02046 MOBILE PRINT INC. SERVICE 100.00
SUPPLIES 245.00
395.00
02691 TN~PSON ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS SERVICE 2077.00
02001 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC.OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.92
02832 RAL-MART STORES, INC. SUPPLIES 82.7i
TOTA~ : 4554.02
CC~94~NTTY DEVELOPMENT -
04887 AMERI-CRAFT EXTERIORS RENAB PROJ 4700.00
01815 k~tSTHUDAR CONTRACTORS COmPlY SINGLE F~ILY RERAB PROJECT 7904.00
01021 CAMPFIRE BOYS ARD GIRLS NEW HORIZONS PRG 666.67
CARP KOOL EO~D 500.00
1166.67
01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP AIRBILL 47.11
02052 MORAN, MICHAEL J. CDBG-RREAB 100.00
HUI{AR RE~ 180.50
280.50
04227 NO~ST SO~UNBAM COUNCIL/BOYS SCOOTS JAR-FEB-MAR 625.00
02420 REDOUNCRS FOR CC~9~NTTY LIVING JAb-MAR 250.00
02659 SUBURBAN ~R~i~ARY HRAI, TN COUNCIL JAN/REB/~AR 2124.99
TOTAL : 17098.27
EOE%N SERVICES
02919 303 CAB A~DOCIATIUN, INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES 425.90
01766 AHU~RICAR TAXI CO,INC. 60 SENIOR TAXI RIDES 161.40
04845 C.%BRLNT CUNNVA'T IONS REGtSTME-B.MIOTRE 30.00
01153 CC~fuNITY CAB CO. 1St RUNIOR TAXI RIDES 437.90
03957 FLOREY, ~I~RGARET PROFESSDO{~At LICEWEE 40.00
01979 MCI ~IRERERS $~VICR 30.90
02536 S~%?,NTEEW SPECIALTIES INC. ELREREOI;Ot~ PINS 722.60
02758 UNIVEXSITY OF CAX, IFO~IA AT BUN$CRL~TION P-ERUNAL 28.00
TOTAL : 1076.70
REPORT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 ROM: THU~DAY RER2700 13:24 PACE 8
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF HILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARE OF TRUSTEES FR~ APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DE~T VENDOR NBR VENDOR NA~E ! INVOICE DESCRIPTION A~OUNT
BOLICE
01077 CHICAGO CC{~{. SERVICE, INC. SERVICE 3360.00
01081 CHICAGO SUN-TIMES INC AD FOR PATROL OFFICER 1024.00
01222 DAILY HERALD CLERICAL AD 224.25
04732 DBX ONLINE, INC. SERVICES RENDERED 4/00 150.00
01354 ENTENMAN'~-ROVIN CO. SERVICE 35.00
01366 EXPERIAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION 33.00
01469 GATEWAY COMPANIES INC. LAPTOP 5422.00
01503 GLDOK INC. REGISTRETION 85.00
01558 EA~SEN ASS~IATES MONTHLY SERVICE 547.87
MONTHLY SERVICE 276.24
MONTHLY SERVICE 100.00
924.11
00106 IC~A ~NTIREXENT TRUST - 401 IC~A-401 PLAN 425.63
04848 IJOA REGISTRATION 130.00
01673 ILLINOIS CRIME PREV. ASSN. TEAIWING COM~RENCE 220.00
01739 INTOXIMETE~, INC. RECEARGERELE BATTERIES 94.58
04851 JOLIET 4OMIOR COLLEGE REGISTER-MCGUFFIN 550.00
01794 EALE OMIRORES, INC. OMIFO~ SUPPLIES 94.50
CLOTHING SUPPLIES 30.45
124.95
01808 KC FITNESS B~VICE SERVICE 114.00
01979 MCI WIRELESS SERVICE 636.27
04857 NEC TECEXO~OGIES MAINTENANCE AGEXE~{ENT 4500.00
04668 P.F. P~TTtBONE & CO. CLOTHING SUPPLIES 20.05
02259 PAGEXET SEGER RE~AL SERVICE 406.59
02304 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 166.41
MISC EXPRESEN 139.63
MIEC ~XPE~RES 2.15
MISC REPEXSES 33.00
MISC EXPENSES 44.75
394.04
~PORT: APBOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: TEURSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 9
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILI~ P~SENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ APRIL I4 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DE~T VENDOR NER VENDOR NANE INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02315 PIONEER P~ASS SUBSCRI[~ION 14.95
02378 QUICK P~INT PLUS, INC. SUPPLIES 230.45
SUPPLIES 170.95
401.40
02392 RAUS, ~A~K ~EI~UASE EXPENSES 112.00
02396 RAY}~O,K OFFICE PROD & FURN ONE STk~P RUBBER 34.50
02484 SAFETY KLNEN CORPORATION SERVICE i08.85
04139 STANA~D & ASSDOIATES NECRUtT TESTING 2255.00
02680 TELET~AC, INC. SE~ICE-A~RIL 2000 1092.00
02723 TRITON ELECTRONICS, INC. RADIO NERAIR t10.00
RADIO REPAIR 55.00
RADIO REPAIR 99.99
~DIO MAINTEXA~CE 27.50
~ADIO REPAIAS 55.00
347.49
02796 VEF C(}94]NtCATIONS INC. ~ADIO NEPAI~ 118.00
02835 WAREHOUSE DtASCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 86.40
02893 WOLF C~ERA, INC. PHOTO PROCESSING 78.53
FII/~ 270.00
FI~ 165.00
513.53
TOTAL : 23957.59
FI~E
01195 AGA GAS, INC. CYLINDER RENTAL 91.13
01227 AIR ONE EQUI[~EN~, INC. AIR TEST QgR 380.00
01246 AIRGAS NORTH CENTRAL CYLINDER ~AL 82.95
CYqNDER ~i:/{TAL 20.20
103.15
04642 AIR~O~CH PAGING EAGER S~VICH 1395.06
01006 BOASE CAR WASH, INC. CA~ NASB 15.75
01049 CD~ ~OVE/~g/~L INC ~t~I PAGE PRO 223.68
01097 CI~k~ CO~ ~tIDOI~ EXPF~SN 24.00
203.00
REPORT: AREOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 t5:58 RDM: THURSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 10
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSREC~
LIST OF SILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FECM APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NI~E IRVOICE DESCRIPTION ~OUNT
.................................................................................. r ................................................
04858 CLENENS INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 296.00
01369 FAIRVIEN PRINTING SERVICE SERVICE 160.00
01377 FEDERAL EXPRESS CONP POSTAGE SERVICE 15.34
04847 PTI REGISTRATION 550.00
00350 HUENANN, ANTHONT REENB 68.00
01685 ILLINOIS FIRE II4SREC?OAS ASSN. i~{5'~DMREHIP/FIGOLAH 10.00
01748 INTEREATIONAL SOCIETY OF FIRE MENBERSHIP/FIDOLAH 75.00
01767 JENS PUBLISHING SUBSCRIPTIONS/REI4HELLY 27.97
01793 KAISER PROFESSIONAL PHOTO LAB PHOTO FINISHING 23.00
01794 KALE UNIFODMS, INC. NAME TAGS 92.50
RISC.UNIFORMS IT,S 341.80
434.30
01808 KC FITNESS SERVICE SERVICE 114.00
TREADMILL REPAIR 85.00
199.00
01851 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY OXYGEN 202.10
01912 LUGGAGE LIMITED INC. BOOT REPAIRS 20.00
01941 MALCOEN, JOHN EXPENSES 42.61
EXPENSES 70.20
112.81
01979 MCI WIRELESS MCI SERVICE 48.84
04892 OCEAN TECREOLDOY SYRTENS REGISTER-GRANDOEDMGE 100.00
02303 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. 14DMTINGS,TRNG,SUPP 17.30
~NTFEGS,TRNG,SUPP 45.80
MERTFEGS,TREG,SUPP 97.16
~RTtHGE,TRIG,EUPP 0.00
I. IEETINGS,TREG, SUPP 19.4I
187.67
02408 REID ~iID ASS~iATE$, JOSS E. SERVICE 175.00
04595 TAIJ~P, ASS RVNTE~$ LTD. 64 ~ MI~iORY MODULE 172.00
02684 TEREACE SUPPLY CCiiPANY CART 211.21
04859 VILLAGE OF ElK GROVE REGIST~TtDM 1585.00
/~EPORT: APSOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NO~ 99 15:58 RUN: THBNEDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 11
R~LEASE ID :
VILk~GE OF MO~N~ PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS P~S~TED TO THE BO~ OF TRUSTEES R~ APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DE~ ~R NER ~N~R N~E I~OICE DESC~ION ~0~
................................................................................................... t ...............................
01228 W.S D~EY & CO. N~E PATCHES 125.18
02832 WAL-~RT STO~S, INC. FI~ PR~ESSING & SUPPLIES 112.30
T~AL : 7262.49
PUBLIC ~ - A~INISTR
01049 CDW ~VE~E~, INC ~PL CDR ACER 50.49
01053 CELLU~ ONE - CHICA~ SERVICE 61.45
01097 CI~ CORP ~tFO~ SERV 90.75
~IFO~ SERV 408.00
498.75
01474 G~PLER'S tNC ~PLAC~E~ ~ CAPS 145.90
02155 ~TEL C~ICATI~S USAGE C~NES 291.84
USAGE C~GES 128.76
420.60
02358 PROSA~TY SUPPLIES 22L30
02844 ~GU~D C~HING 1410.17
T~ : 2808.66
01071 ADDISON BUILDING ~X~ CO. BUILDING SUPPLIES 10.25
BUILDING SUPPLIES 44.17
BUILDING SUPPLIES 22.50
BUILDING SUPPLIES 62.16
BUILDING SUPPLIES 20.86
BUILDING SUPPLIES 17.68
BUILDING NUPPLtES 20.06
197.68
01830 ~DE~ EL~ATOR CO. ~CE 160.63
01833 ~DE~ON L~K C~P~ ~ S~PPLIES 3/2000 409.95
~ SUPPLIES 3/2000 178.56
588.51
01840 ~DE~ PEST CO~L PEST C~ 66.25
02788 BEST ~ITY ~ING, INC. S~VIC~ 6941.00
01058 C~Y ~S, INC ~ING SUPPLI~ 161.82
~ING SUP~I~ 215.98
377.80
APNOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NO~ 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY ARE2700 13:24 PAGE 12
REL~ARE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
01060 CENTURY TILE SUPPLIES 107.22
01287 DOOE SYSTEMS, INC. REPAIR 875.00
SERVICE 150~35
SERVICE 180.72
REPAIR 1233.00
SERVICE 1521.00
3960.07
01291 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY MAINTENANCE 190.57
01896 J.C. LICHTCOMPANY PAINTING SUPPLIES 78.47
PAINTING SUPPLIES 28,65
101.12
01983 MCCADLEV MECHANICAL SERVICE COOLING UNIT 2889.50
COULIHG~IT 2889.50
57?9.00
02193 WORTH~EST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 391.08
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 93.60
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIE~ 545.39
1030.07
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL/SUPP 38.70
02722 TRI-STATE ELECTRONIC CORP ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 21.7i
02754 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LAND LEASE 1327.95
02806 VILLAGE 6FMOUNT PROSPECT SERVICE 21.42
SERVICE 6.43
27.85
TOTAL : 20916.13
WORKS - FORESTRY/
01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BUILDINGSUFRLIES 116.53
01124 ARTHUR CLESEM, INC. SUPPLIES 434.20
01429 EOREOTRYNUPPLIERS INC. SUPP 90.25
02308 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL/SUPP 5.00
02008 R~ERMEYER & SON HAULING & SWEEPING 2830.50
MAULING & SWEEPING 1095.00
3925.50
04263 UNITED NOMTIOULTURALSUPRAY SUPPLIES 420.00
SUPPLIES 1993.00
R.~PONT: APBOARDRPT GEWEKATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 13
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR WER VENDOR NA~E I~OICE DESCRIUTION ~OUNT
2413.00
TOTAL : 6984.56
PUBLIC WORES - ENGIREERI
01302 ALDRI~E ELECTRIC, INC. ~{AINT~ANCE 800.00
04355 COOK COUNTY TREASURER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 554.46
01645 IAFSM MUN~E~SHtP RF~EWAL 40.00
02193 NORTHWEUT ELEOTRICA~ SUPPLY ELECTNICA5 SUPPLIES 523.70
02704 TOPCON MIDWEST SUPPLIES 550.75
TOTAL : 2468.91
NBLIC WO~J,S - WATER/SEW
01071 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIA~ CO. BUILDING SUPPLIES 402.54
01620 A~E~,ICA~ LANDSCAPING INC. RE~Y ~STOR 3545.70
PAAL'~AY RESTORATION 12952.50
16498.20
01973 APWA-CHICAGO ME~O CBA~TER REGISTk~TtuN 132.00
02328 AUTOMATIC CONTROL REUDOES RE,VICE CALL 1315.00
02541 BANSON CHUNICAL CO. SUPPLIES 206.60
02938 BO{9{A~ DIUTRABUTIUN Ci~TER RA~UNA~E A~D AUTO PARTS 63.19
01049 CDW GOVEP~ENT, INC NP DATA CARTRIDGES 95.49
SUPPLIE~ 2562.00
2657.49
01053 CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO SERVICE 61.46
U1097 CINTAS CORE UNIFO~ S~V 90.76
UNIFO~ RERV 408.01
498.77
01323 EAST JONDA~ IRON~O~J~S PARTS 190.00
01474 G~{P~ER'S IWE REPLAC~)~k'{T ~LAP CAPS 145.90
01896 J.C. LIC~ C~PANY PAI~ING SUPPLIES 693.36
01787 ~IE, INC. SERVICE CNARGES 276.80
01990 ~{I~A~T~-CA~i~ SUPPLIES 104.46
U2155 ~(TEL DO~{~NtCATIONS SUPPLIES 468.70
, z{
REPORT: APBOARDRP? GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE t4
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECI
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO TEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DEPI VENDOR NBR VENDOR I~AMB INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
04856 RORLAB, INC. SUPPLIES 188.60
02193 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 448.09
02305 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TEAVEL/SUPP 15.40
02358 PROSA~TY SUPPLIES 221.31
02008 ROGER MEYER & SON HAULING & S~EEPING 1945.46
BAUIING & SWEEPING 3011.45
4956.91
04854 TEENIE'S IRC,.. RENTAL L~BERJAUN I650.00
04838 THIRD MILLENlqluN ARSOC.IHC. SERVICES 1686.10
02756 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE POSTAGE-WATER RILLS 8000.00
04860 UTILSAFE PUBLICATIONS UTILITY LINE MARKING ~L~2qUAL 21.05
02767 UN-~DISUN REGISTRATIUN 120.00
02044 WEARGUARD CLOTHING 1410.17
TC~kL : 39404.00
PUBLIC WORKS - REFUSE DI
02016 ARC DISPOSAL COMPAMY MARCH COLLECTIONS 49597.02
MARCH COLLEC~IUNS 19889.29
MARCH COLLECTIONS 29092.28
MARCH COLLECTIONS 2794.I8
MARCH COLLECTIONS 9249.17
111121.94
TOTAL : 111121.94
PUBLIC NOMKS - VEHICLE M
01187 AETNA TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 11.12
04642 AIRTOGCH PAGING EAGENG SERVICE 23.20
02319 AUTO COLOR MASKING TAPE 122.40
02938 BO~R4AN DISTRSBU~IOM CENTER HARDWARE AMD AUTO PARTS 1279.70
01006 BUSRE CAR HASH, INC. CAR WASMES-MARCH,2000 871.50
01045 CATCHING FLUIDPOfdER PARTS-CREDIT 25,20-
PARTS 352,27
PARTS 33.55
360.62
01058 CENTURY LABS, ENC CLEANING SUPPLIES 127.78
APBOARDR~T G~E~TED: 5 NOV 99 I5:58 RUN: TNURSDAY AP~2700 13:24 PAGE I5
REAL, SE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PR0~PECT
LIST OF BILLS PReSENtED TO THE ~ OF TRUSTEES
· ~ APRIL 14 200~ TO APRIL 27 2000
.VEN~R NBR ~N~R N~E I~OICE DESCRIPTION ~O~
01236 DAVE & JIM'S A~O BODY, INC. ~C~GE A/C 35.00
01866 D~, ~Y ROESCH P~TS 107.58
03958 ~D I~E~ATIONAL ~PAIR P~S 167.20
~PAIR PARTS 71.68
~PAIR P~TS 5.96
244.84
01511 ~DY~ SEUICE STO~S TI~S 526.08
04629 INDUSTRIAL STEEL SEU. CTR. SUPPLIES 490.88
01750 I~E~TATE BAKERY BAKERY 215.85
01872 ~TTOF CH~OLET, INC. A~O P~TS 2431.24
a~o P~TS 256.00
2687.24
01879 L~CH ~ERPRISES, INC. SEUICE 239.70
SEUICE 118.56
358.26
01914 L~D INDUSTRIES, INC. P~TS 164.90
01990 M~TER-~ SUPPLIES I86.02
02014 MID-~RICA TR. & EQUIP.CO.INC SEUICE 365.00
02018 MIDWAY TRUCK P~TS P~TS 143.94
02058 MORT~ GR~ A~I~ ~BUILD EQUIP~ 195.00
02305 PE~Y ~H - ~LIC WO~ T~5/SUPP 18.80
T~L/SUPP t12.57
131.37
02320 PLEZ~L ~PE~ SUPPLIES 525.00
02374 ~ITY DISCO~ A~O P~TS A~O 9~S 3/2000 370.13
02491 SAUBER M~. CO. ~ ~DE~ 711.~0
02575 SN~-~ I~USTRI~ SUPLIES 56.35
P~TS 633.75
690.1~
02684 T~CE SUPPLY C~P~ C~DER ~ 3.10
02769 ~ A~ SUPPLY AC DE~O ~PAIR 1460.~2
REPORT: APEOARENPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 i5:58 RUN: THURSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 16
RELEASE ID :
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS P~ESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ~RUN APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DBPT VENDOR NBR VENDOR NAME · INVOICE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
02793 VERMEER-ILLINOIS, INC PANTS 583.68
TOTAL : 12991.3i
CC~94UNITY SERVICE PROGRA
03021 L~TERI, LAURA L. REIME 64.84
02301 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC ~PENSES 6.00
02378 QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. YOUTH RESOURCE CATALOG 51.00
YOUTH RESOURCE CATALOG 50.90
101.90
04037 VILRAGE TROLLEY & TOUR~ TROLLBY-4TH OF ~LY 200.00
TOTAL : 372.74
CAPITAL IMPROVL~ENT EROJ
04888 ANDERSON BROS. FORD 2000 FORD-CkRS 205670.00
02167 AREUN ROAD CONSTRUCTION ST.RESUREACING 72690.75
STREET RESURFACING 107989.20
180679.95
04842 DI CONTI, IRENE CONSULTATION 1200.00
02030 MILES CEL~;ROLET, INC. INV 1011 21079.00
04855 RUNNEL L. SKYLES, DDS INC. REIM FOR L~ARE 46258.02
02491 SAUBNR MFG. CO. PARTS 719.00
PARTS 2335.00
3054.00
02521 SDI CONS~TARTS LTD. CONTRACT k~NDMENT 4504.81
SERVICE 6939.8I
11444.62
TOTAL : 469385.59
RNTIRRE PENSIONS
01027 CAPITA~ ~AtNS INC. INVESTME~ M~4T.4/2000 2742.00
IRVESTig2~T M(~'~T. 4/2000 2226.00
4960.00
04849 IPEFA POLICE PENSION 650.00
04890 8KGA~L BRYANT & NARILL INVEST.M~4~ N~RV 6933.03
INVERET .M(~f~ SERV 7762.36
14695.39
~PONT: APEOARDRPT GENERATED: 5 NOV 99 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY AP~2700 13:24 PAGE 17
RELEXSE ID :
JILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FR~ APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
DEPT VENDOR NBa VENDOR NAME INVOICE DESCRIPTION MOUNT
TOTAL : 20313.39
RISK MANAGENENT
04844 BULINSKI, DAVID REINBURSE~ENT 149.67
04850 DENNIS BYKNE, LTD. CONSULTING 3850.00
01306 DRUG CARD, INC. CARD CLAIMS 10868.44
?NBSCRIPTION CARD CLAIMS 12116.26
22984.70
01542 E.E.L.P. EXCESS INSURENCE 35282.50
01966 MARTIN BOYER COMPANV,INC WORE~RS C~P EXPENSES 3313.26
TOTAL : 65580.13
GRAND TOTAL : 1172229.30
GENERATED: 5 NOV 9~ 15:58 RUN: THURSDAY APR2700 13:24 PAGE 18
RELEASE ID :
VILk~GE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LIST OF BILLS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM APRIL 14 2000 TO APRIL 27 2000
S~ARY BY FUND
001 GENERAL FUND 364890.48
030 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 124882.94
050 MOTOR F~E5 TAX FUND 182034.41
070 CO~3NITY DEVELP~T BLOCK Gk~T 17090.27
510 CAPITAL IMPROVL~ENT FUND 1200.00
550 DOWNTOWN REDEV~P~ CONST 57702.64
610 WATER A~D SE~R ~3ND 39996.22
630 PAREING SYSTE~ REVENUE FUND i449.70
660 VEHICLE ~INTENANCE FUND 30704.21
670 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 229803.00
690 RISK ~%~AG~ENT FUND 77736.64
710 POLICE PENSION FUND 9809,03
720 FIRE PENSION ~ND 10504.36
770 F~XCOMP ESCROW FUND 11187.29
790 ESCR~ DEPOSIT ~D 13230.11
T~: 1172229.30
PROCLAMATION
CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY WEEK
MAY 1-5, 2000
WI~EREAS, it is believed that 90% of fire deaths in Illinois could be prevented if every residence
had smoke detectors and proper home escape plans; and
WHEREAS, to achieve that goal, the Office of the State Fire Marshal and organizations of Fire
Chiefs, Fire Inspectors and Firefighters have joined together in a state-wide program to make the
public more aware of the advantages that properly placed smoke detectors can give; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Firefighters work diligently to reduce the horrendous fire deaths
and property losses through prevention, public education and suppression; and
WREREAS, the Mount Prospect Fire Department, Randhurst Shopping Center and neighboring fire
departments will once again host the CtIILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY FESTIVAL, at the Randhurst
Mall May 1-5, 2000, at which time children of'all ages will be encouraged to learn and participate in
proper fire survival techniques.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby
proclaim the week of May 1-5, 2000 as
CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY WEEK.
in the Village of Mount Prospect and I call upon our citizens individually, and as a community, to
actively support their firefighters in their efforts to reduce fire deaths, injuries and property loss. I
also urge the news media and other public information officers to join in the recognition and to
encourage participation in this event.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Dated this 2nd day of May, 2000.
PROCLAMATION
MUNICIPAL CLERKS WEEK
APRIL 30- MAY 6, 2000
WHEREAS, the Office of the Municipal Clerk, a time honored and vital part of local
government exists throughout the world; and
WHEREAS, the Office of the Municipal Clerk is the oldest among public servants; and
WHEREAS, the Office of the Municipal Clerk provides the professional link between thc
citizens and the local governing bodies and agencies of government at other levels; and
WHEREAS, Municipal Clerks have pledged to be ever mindful of their neutrality and
impartiality, rendering equal service to all; and
WHEREAS, the Municipal Clerk serves as the information center on functions of local
government and community; and
WHEREAS, Municipal Clerks continually strive to improve the administration of the affairs of
the Office of the Municipal Clerk through participation in education programs, seminars,
workshops and the annual meetings of their state, county and international professional
organizations;
WHEREAS, it is most appropriate that we recognize the contributions and accomplishments of
the Office of the Municipal Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, l, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do
proclaim the week of April 30 through May 6, 2000, as Municipal Clerks Week, and further
extend appreciation to our Municipal Clerk, Velma W. Lowe, and to all Municipal Clerks for the
vital services they perform and their exemplary dedication to the communities they represent.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Dated this 2"a day of May, 2000.
PROCLAMATION
PUBLIC WORKS WEEK
MAY 22-26, 2000
WHEREAS, the services provided by Public Works in our community are an integral part of our
citizens' everyday lives; and
WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient
operation of a public works system and its many programs relating to water, sewers, streets and
highways, public buildings, public grounds, solid waste collection, recycling, trees, and snow
removal; end
WHEREAS, the quality end effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design and
construction are dependent upon the efforts end skills of public works officials; and
WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works
departments is materially imfluenced by the people% attitude and understanding of the importance
of the work they perform; end
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Public Works Department will have en Open House on Saturday,
May 20, 1999 between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., in an effort to acquaint the residents
of the Village of Mount Prospect with the meny services provided by the Public Works Depar~nent.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby
proclaim the week of May 22-26, 2000 as
PUBLIC WORKS WEEK
in the Village of Mount Prospect and I call upon all citizens end civic organizations to acquaint
themselves with the various services provided by the Mount Prospect Public Works Department in
order to assure the health, safety end comfort of our residents.
I invite everyone to attend the Public Works Open House on Saturday, May 20th for a tour of the
facility, to inspect the equipment and to take adventage of the opportunity to talk to employees who
cen fully explain the various operations of the department.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
Dated this 2~d day of May, 2000.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS ~
DATE: APRIL 24, 2000
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A CLASS R LIQUOR LICENSE
(CONSUMPTION AT DINING TABLES ONLY)
GEHT MYEUL RESTAURANT, 1747 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
On Monday, April 24, 2000, the Village Manager met with Ms. Hyun Ok Kwon and her attorney
Peter Lee to discuss Ms. Kwon's request to operate a new restaurant under the existing Class R
License issued to the above location. Up until March 20, 2000, Red A Chinese Restaurant
operated at this location with a Class R License. Ms. Kwon purchased the restaurant and
facilities from the previous owner. The Class R designation provides for the serving of alcoholic
beverages at dining tables only.
The restaurant is currently closed while modest remodeling is underway. Ms. Kwon plans a
menu of Japanese and Korean cuisine and will have a lunch and dinner menu. Ms. Kwon will
manage the facility and plans to bring in a new cook and wait staff. Ms. Kwon indicated that she
does not have any previous experience either running a restaurant or serving alcohol in a
restaurant setting. Her most recent work experience includes working at a fish market. She
indicated that she had some experience working in restaurants in Korea.
The Village Manager had extensive discussion with Ms. Kwon and her attorney regarding the
Village's Liquor Code and the community's particular sensitivity to the service of minors or the
over-service of legal patrons. Ms. Kwon indicated that she has read the Village's rules and
regulations and understands them. She also understands that she will be held accountable for
any violations of the Liquor Code occasioned by her wait staff. An application has been
completed and all fees have been paid. We are currently awaiting Dram Shop Insurance
certificates. Ms. Kwon has also submitted to the required background check and fingerprinting.
If the Village Board supports the request, it would be necessary to approve a Motion authorizing
a change in ownership for the existing Class R Liquor License currently issued to this location.
MEJ/rcc ~
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUS'I t:ES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That in accordance with Subsection A of section 13.108 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect, as amended, the Corporate Authorities shall determine the number of Liquor Licenses
available in each Classification and shall establish a list specifying the number of Liquor Licenses authorized.
Said list is hereby amended by decreasing the number of Class C Liquor Ucenses by one (1) Walgreen,s~ 1010
Mt. Prospect Plaza. Said list is as follows:
Zero (0) Class A License
Two (2) Class B Licenses
Eight (8) Class C Licenses
One (1) Class D License
Two (2) Class E Licenses
One (1) Class G License
Zero (0) Class H License
Zero (0) Class M License
Zero (0) Class P License
Seventeen (17) Class R Licenses
Sixteen (16) Class S Licenses
One (1) Class T License
Five (5) Class W Licenses
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in 'the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of ,2000.
Village President
A~E~:
Village Clerk
Class Establishment Number
A 0
B Dumas Waiter's; Ye Olde Town Tnn 2
C Alvee's Liquors; Balzano Liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors; .lay Liquors;
Mt. Prospect Liquors; Osco Drugs;
Walgreens (83 and Golf) 8
D Prospect Moose Lodge
E Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall 2
G Mt. Prospect Park District-Golf Course
H 0
[vi :. 0
p 0
R Artemis; Chungkiwa Restaurant; Cuisine of India;
Fellini; Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); Han River;
House of Szechwan; Izakaya Sankyu; LaTejanita;
Little America; Nina Restaurant; Pusan; Red A Chinese
Restaurant; Riva Bella; Sakura; Taqueria Fiesta; Todshin :17
S Applebee's; Bella Capri; El Sombrero;
.lake's Pizza; .lameson's Charhouse; Kampai;
The Loft; Mrs. P & Me Restaurant; New Shin .lung;
Nikld D's Charhouse; Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant;
Pap's Grill & Bar; Retro Bistro; Rokudenashi; Sam's Place :16
T Thunderbird Lanes 1
W Frankie's Fast Food; Los Arcos Restaurant;
Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace;
Photo's Hot Dogs _~5
53
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF E-COMMERCE EOUITY
WHEREAS, the use of new communications technologies, including the Interact, as a way to
conduct sales of goods and services is accelerating; and
WltEREAS, out-of-state vendors who conduct sales via the Internet, mail order, and phone,
under many circumstances, are not required by law to collect existing sales and use taxes
imposed by state and local governments in which the purchaser resides; and
WHEREAS, the primary barrier to collecting taxes on remote sales is the Supreme Court's
ruling in Quill v. North Dakota which defers to Congress, and only Congress, to authorize states
to require remote vendors to collect taxes in a manner that does not unduly burden interstate
commerce; and
WHEREAS, current laws create a competitive disadvantage and great inequities between
merchants who sell from traditional "Brick- and-Mortar" establishments and those who sell from
electronic stores; and
WHEREAS, this migration of sales to the Internet is restricting the ability of state and local
governments and school districts to collect taxes which finance essential public services
including but not limited to police, fire, emergency medical service, education, social services,
infrastructure development, and local healthcare; and
WItEREAS~ the United States Constitution reserves for the states the right to collect and impose
taxes; and
WHEREAS, 45 states and the District of Columbia collect over 40 percent of overall revenue
from sales taxes to fund vital public services; and
WHEREAS, a recent University of Tennessee study estimates that state sales tax revenue losses
in 2003 will exceed $10 billion; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce, established by the Intemet
Tax Freedom Act, failed to address, in a fair and equitable manner, the growing volume of tax-
free sales transactions occurring over the Intemet, which have put "brick-and-mortar" stories at a
competitive disadvantage; and
WHEREAS, the Commission's report to Congress does not effectively address the tax losses
state and local governments will experience if the Intemet becomes a permanently tax-free retail
market.
Page 2/2
E-Commerce
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect opposes any congressional action to
implement the Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce's report proposals that would
preempt state and local sovereignty, guaranteed by the 10th Amendment of the United States
Constitution; and
SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect supports simplification of state and local
sales taxes, and urges states to move expeditiously to craft and approve model legislation; and
SECTION THREE: That the Village of Mount Prospect opposes any congressional efforts to
expand the current moratorium to cover state and local sales and use taxes; and
SECTION FOUR: That the Village of Mount Prospect opposes any efforts to extend the current
moratorium unless the extension is for two years or less and is directly linked to congressional
authorization to states that simplify their sales and use tax system to collect use tax on all remote
transactions.
SECTION FIVE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
Village of Mount prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY JR., DIllECTOR OF COMMUNITY DE'v~E,~y
DATE: APRIL 25, 2000
SUBJECT: LOFTS AND SHOPS AT VILLAGE CENTRE - PROPOSED DEFERRAL
Staff is requesting that the Village Board defer the above zoning case to their next meeting to provide the
petitioner the opportunity to 'resolve two outstanding issues; off site parking and final brick color. Staff has been
working with the petitioner for the past several weeks to resolve these matters and is confident that a final
determination can be made by the Village Board's May 16th meeting. In addition, the proposed deferral will not
hold up the construction time line for the project.
As you are aware, the petitioner must provide 34 off site parking spaces to meet the parking requirements for their
project. The petitioner has been working with Bank One representatives to secure a parking agreement in their lot
across from the Library. In addition, staff has been negotiating a parking lease agreement with the owner of the
office building located at 200 E. Evergreen, across from the Police/Fire building for 16 spaces. I anticipate a
response from both Bank One and the 200 E. Evergreen owner within the next week.
The issue with the final brick colors relates primarily to the white brick that is proposed along the eastern frontage
of the project. After lengthy discussion, it was agreed that white brick was not consistent with the existing
architecture in the downtown area and that it would be more appropriate to utilize a brick in the red/brown color
family. Norwood will construct a "mini" wall next week that will demonstrate the various proposed bricks for the
project and provide the Village Board with an opportunity to view how the project will actually look. I will
advise you when the wall is available for viewing.
Please forward this memorandum to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their May 2
meeting. Staffwill be present at the meeting to further discuss this matter.
H:\CDADMIN~BILL'~IEMOS~norwood-42500.doc
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~
DATE: APRIL 14, 2000
SUBJECT: PC-08-99/DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION FOR THE LOCATION OF~
STORM WATER DETENTION FACILITY
I W. RAND ROAD (RAND AND KENSINGTON ROADS)
KAP-SUM PROPERTIES
The petitioner, Kap-Sum Properties, proposes to construct a new retail development at the former LaSalle Bank
property at 1 W. Rand Road. The development includes razing the existing building and constructing a 17,000
square foot retail development. The petitioner proposes to locate the storm water detention basin adjacent to the
new structure. There would be a decorative security fence around the basin with locked gates at two points of
entrance. In addition, the proposed basin would have two "escape" ramps should someone inadvertently gain
access. The petitioner proposes to landscape the surrounding area in an attractive manner, but not to attract
people to the detention basin. Sec. 16.405.F.1 of the Development Code requires that above ground storm water
detention facilities are located at least 25-feet from the structure. The petitioner is seeking an exception from this
requirement. The Plan Commission met in a regular session April 5, 2000 and discussed the petitioner's request.
The Plan Commission voted 4-1 to approve an exception to the Development Code requirement for the location of
the storm water detention basin and allow the petitioner to locate the basin adjacent to the building. Furthermore,
there was a desire to have the petitioner work with Village staffto arrive at a landscape improvement design that
screens the detention basin along Kensington Road and Route 83 in a manner t~at is consistent with the proposed
.Corridor Design Guidelines. Plan Commission cited the unique characteristics of the property (elevations,
shallow inlet, IDOT regulations) and that the proposed design inet the intent of the Development Code regulation
as reasons for approving the exception.
The Village Code requires the concurring vote of five (5) members of the Plan Commission to make any
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village. Therefore, the case is transmitted to
Village Board without a recommendation. The Village Code does not require a super majority vote for Village
Board to approve the petitioner's request, as determined by the Village Attorney.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
April 5, 2000
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman
Michael Zadel at 7:50 p.m. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect,
Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Present upon Roll Call: Michael Zadel, Chairman
Gary Grouwinkel
William Reddy
Matt Sledz
Carol Tortorello
Absent: Antoinette Astreides
Frank Boege
Edwin Janus
Village Staff Present: Judy Connolly, AICP, Planner
Chuck Lindelof, P.E., Project Engineer
Others in Attendance: Jerry Brown, SRI
Helen Cohen, Archideas
James Kaplan, Yap-Sum Properties
Jeff Miller, Archideas
Walter Graft, Gewalt Hamilton
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Chairman Zadel opened the meeting and asked for comments on minutes from March 15, 2000. Carol
Tortorollo said that the minutes should be amended to show that Jim Tinaglia, Ben Trapani, Ed Dowling,
and Mark Latimer were the only "Others in Attendance" and that it was incorrect to use the numeral "1" for
the name of Bank One. Chairman Zadel agreed and asked if there were additional comments. As there
were none, Carol Tortorello moved to approve the minutes as amended and Bill Reddy seconded the
motion. The motioned carried 4-0 with Matt Sledz abstaining.
SUBDMSIONS:
NONE
OLD BUSINESS:
NONE
NEW BUSINESS:
PC-08-99/Development Code Excepti0n/l W. Rand Road ('Rand and Kensington Roads)
Chairman Zadel introduced the first item of businass and asked Sudv Connolly to review the case.
Ms..C~.,nnolty said tha{ the property owner'proposes to raze the existing LaSall~ Bank.tO construct
a retail de~elopmimt a~ I W; Rand Roa~d.~ The petitioner is reqhesfing relief'from the
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of Aprit 5.2000 Meeting Page 2
Development Code to locate the detention facility closer than the minimum distance required by
code.
Ms. Connolly said the intent of the code requirement was to avoid foundation saturation, which
may lead to structural defects, and to create a safer development by keeping dramatic grade
changes and standing water away from building users. She said that the Development Code was
changed in 1996, previously requiring a 75-foot setback from the building and now allowed a 25-
foot setback. She said that this change reflected the Village's ability to be flexible to developers'
needs without compromising safety concerns.
Ms. Connolly said that the petitioner's property fronts onto two IDOT roads and that IDOT
requires detention facilities to be located ten feet, plus 1.5 times the depth of the detention basin,
from an IDOT right-of-way. Ms. Connolly said that to meet this standard, the petitioner proposes
to locate the detention area behind the building, directly adjacent to the structure. She said that
the petitioner is seeking relief from Village requirements because the property is located between
two IDOT roads that have the potential to be widened. Locating the detention facility according
to Village requirements, in close proximity to the [DOT right-of-way could create an unsafe
situation if either of the roads is widened.
She said that the property at 1 W. Rand Road is difficult to develop because the adjacent angled
roads create an unusual shaped lot, the site slopes slightly downward along the southwest
property line, and the receiving sewer has a shallow depth. These factors limit the location of the
detention facility, its depth, and size because the new detention facility has to be consistent with
the existing site conditions and compatible with the existing sewer infrastructure. Ms. Connolly
said that Village staff met with the petitioner, the architect, and the engineer for the project and
rewewod several different storm water detention facility designs. She said that the Village's
Engineering Division reviewed the petitioner's request and found that there was an alternative
way to design the site that meets IDOT and Village codes without requiring an exception to the
Village's Development Code requirements.
Ms. Connolly explained that the petitioner stated that the design that meets Development Code
regulations is impractical to maintain and requires installing over 500 feet of three-font by nine-
foot concrete box sections. The low height of the concrete boxes could reduce the effectiveness
of the sewer system'if sediment and debris enter the storage pipes~
She said that the Development Code requires that the petitioner show that there are no alternate
feasible means of fulfilling the Development Code regulations and that approving the exception
will not impact the health, safety, and welfare of the community. She said that the petitioner
explored alternative designs with Village staff. Ms. Connolly said that the proposed design that
requires an exception to the Development Code can be implemented in a manner that is in
keeping with the intent of Development Code regulations.
Ms. Connolly said that the' Engineering Division and the Building Commissioner reviewed the
petitioner's desig~ and found that it meets the intent of the Development Code requirements and
does not pc~se a safety ba?ard to the neighborhood or the building. She said that additional
hydrostatic pressure calculations are required for a building permit and will be provided before
the Village can issue a buildingpermit.
Ms. Connolly said that the Development Code exception request provides an.opportunity to
'ere. ate an en:h~ncement to this pro. petty; She said it' is fe~ib!e,, although hot a .condition of
apprgval,, for th.e Village .to re4tuest~ tha~ the petitioner's' landscape plan be designed and
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of April 5. 2000 Meeting Page 3
implemented in a manner that is consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines and
exceeds the minimum amount of landscaping required by Village code.
She said that the petitioner's request for an exception to locate a detention facility closer than the
minimum distance required by Village code meets the standards for an exception because the
proposed design is feasible and fulfills the purpOSe of the regulations. The proposed storm water
detention facility will be designed in a manner that does not impact the structural integrity of the
building and includes safety provisions, such as a fence and "escape" ramps. Therefore, staff
recommends approval of the petitioner's request to locate the detention facility closer than 25 feet
from the structure, for the property located at I W. Rand Road, Case No. PC-08-99 and that the
petitioner's landscape plan is designed in a manner that is consistent with the Village's proposed
Corrido~ Design Guidelines.
Ms. Connolly said that the petitioner, his architect, engineer, and structural engineer were
available to answer any questions about the project. Chairman Zadel asked the petitioner
questions about the design of the existing sewers, sewer capacity, and the impact of having a
three-foot tall concrete box under the parking lot. Jeff Miller said that they examined an
underground storage design but that the existing inlet that they have to hook into is extremely
shallow. This requires using a wide box to accommodate the storage. The size of the box makes
the underground storage design difficult to maintain and requires that a person physically enter
the box to clean it out because the box cannot be "flushed out" and sediment would remain on the
bottom. There was detailed discussion about the underground storage design, the size of existing
pipes, sewer flow and capacity, and why the petitioner felt that underground storage was not
appropriate for this site.
There was discussion about the design of the proposed detention basin. Mr. Miller clarified that
the building is a slab on grade and would not have a basement or a crawl space. He said that
earth on the backside of the retaining wall is supporting the hydraulic pressure of the detention
wall. The hydraulic pressure of the water in the pond is opposed by the soil pressure and that the
detention basin walls below grade is solid concrete. Walter Graft and Jerry Brown explained in
detail the design of the walls of the detention basin and the proposed materials. Mr Graft said
that the walls that are visible would be made of a landscape retaining wall material, using
keystone blocks that are either 12" or 24" deep, depending on the georgrid design.
The Plan Commission asked questions about storm water overflow, the traffic flow of the
development, and the landscaping requirements. The Plan Commission asked for examples
where the petitioner used the keystone design. Mr. Graft said that they used this design at
Lutheran General Hospital in a retention system and at Barrington High School for an 1 l-foot tall
keystone wall, connecting two levels. He said that they put a fence and guard rail there for safety
reasons. Mr. Miller said that the Container Store in Oak Brook used a two tier keystone wall.
There was discussion about the track record of the keystone material and design and that it was a
proven system, structurally and esthetically. There was discussion about the safety of the
proposed design, and that the fence should, be vertical to discourage people from climbing the
fence and to make it more difficult to access the site unless entered through the gate. Plan
Commission agreed that the petitioner took reasonable precaution in'designing the detention
basin.
Chairman Zadel said that it was Plan Commission's responsibility to ensure that .codes are met.
He said that in this ease the' Plan Commission. has evidence that this code requirement could be
met.by a different design, but that design posed a hardship. He explained, that. the h.ardship may
not meetthe strictest Deyelopment Code definition, but that the elevations of the property posed
OUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Minutes of April 5, 2000 Meeting Page 4
significant difficulty in implementing an underground storage detention design. There was
discussion that this property was unique because it fronted onto two IDOT regulated roads, was
triangular shaped, and included atypical existing drainage features and elevations. There was
discussion about the impacts of setting a precedent by granting this request. The Plan
Commission noted that the need for exceptions to redevelop specific properties should be
reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
Gary Grouwinkel moved to approve the Development Code exception because of the unique
characteristics of the property (elevations, shallow inlet, IDOT regulations), that the proposed
design met the intent of the Development Code regulation, and that the site would be landscaped
in a manner consistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines. Carol Tortorello seconded
the motion, which was approved 4-1. Bill Re'tidy asked that the minutes reflect that he voted
against the Development Code exception because he supported the underground detention design.
Plan Commission Training Workshop
Chairman Zadel presented the next item of business, an APA facilitated the workshop that he and
Carol Tortorello attended April 1, 2000. He said that representatives from NIPC presented
information on storm water management design. He said that the discussion focused on the
impacts of drainage and was presented for an audience of citizen planners. Chairman Zadel said
another part of the workshop focused on law and ethics, specifically the Open Meetings Act. A
hand out was distributed to the Plan Commission members to review at their convenience. There
was discussion on new ethics legislation. Chairman Zadel and Ms. Tortorello summarized the
workshop information materials on detention ponds, the impacts of using different plant materials
in and around the ponds, and how to discourage geese from congregating around the pond.
COMlVI~NTS AND OTH~R BUSINESS:
There was general discussion on the Corridor Design Guidelines presentation at the March 28
Committee of the Whole meeting. Plan Commission discussed the materials presented to Village
Board and how the design was revised for the COW meeting. They reviewed the items that
Village Board and Plan Commission agreed on and discussed the next steps for the project.
There was discussion on tear-downs and the effects of large-scale second story additions on the
neighborhood. Plan Commission asked for information' on the potential of creating a §ection of
the Development Code that addresses how' new residences or additions should be designed to
minimize the impact on the neighborhood. There was discussion about creating an Architectural
Review Board or having Plan Commission's responsibilities include this aspect of review. Plan
Commission requested that this be an agenda item for a future meeting.
Gary Grouwinkel moved to adjourn the meeting and Bill R. eddy seconded the motion. The
motion carried 5-0 and the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
$~/dfth M.'Cf)n~lly, AICP, Planner \~
Village of Mount prOspect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MICHAEL ZADEL, CHAIRMAN
DATE: MARCH 30, 2000
SUBJECT: PC-08~99fDEVELOPMENT AT RAND & KENSINGTON (1 W. RAND ROAD)
Background
Petitioner: KAP-SUM Properties, LLC
1770 First Street, Suite 201
Highland Park, Illinois 60035
Property Owner: same
Requested Actions: Exception to See. 16.405.F.1 Detention Requirements
Locate storm water detention facility closer than 25 feet from building to be occupied.
Lot coverage: Proposed Lot Coverage: 72% (approximately)
Permitted lot Coverage: 75%
Analysis
The property owner is in the process of designing a retail development at I W. Rand Road (northwest comer of
Rand and Kensington Roads), the now vaeam LaSalle Bank building. The development entails razing the existing
structure and constructing a 17~000 (app!'oximate) square foot shopping center. Village Code requires that all new
developments meet current codes and regulations. The site fronts on two IDOT regulated roads and also is
· required to meet IDOT regulations in addition to Village codes. The petitioner is seeking an exception to the
Village's Development Code for the location of storm water detention. An analysis of the request is provided
below.
Background
The Village's storm water detention location ·requirement was created to avoid foundation saturation, which may
lead to structural defects. In addition, the setback creates an overall safer development by keeping dramatic grade
changes and standing water away from building users. Similarly, [DOT's setback requirements for above ground
storm water..detantion structures were created to address safety needs, which include preventing vehicles from
driving into the'detention facilities located along IDOT rights-of-way.
'.The Village am0nded the Development Code.in 1996 to permit storm water detention facilities 25-feet from a
structure. Bef0r~ the revision; the code requi~ed a'75-foot separation from the Structure. At the time',the 75-foot
separation was required, wet detention basins (structures filled with water year-round) were frequently used as
part'of the storm water detention facility, The intent behind the 75-foot separation was to loeate the detention
- basin away fi.om pedestrian activity (the building) to reduce the potential.of an accident. D~rb0ttom basins are
· mor~ common and 'hold water' during'heavy rains.. Thelp;ra...etice has since changed to us'.m.g, dry-bottom d?te~tiqn
Mount Prospect Plan Commission
PC-05-99/Development at Rand & Kensington Roads (Development Code Exception) Page 2
redevelopment, the Village modified code requirements to permit a 25-foot separation between the storm water
detention basin and the building. The reduced separation reflected the Village's ability to be flexible to
developers' needs without compromising safety concerns.
In the past few years, the Village has experienced more in-fill growth, posing challenges for redevelopment sites.
Recently, several developers have constructed new, large scale commercial or retail facilities. Several of these
facilities are located on IDOT roads and had to meet IDOT, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD),
and other regulatory agencies' regulations. Developing the new retail/commercial facilities was complex and at
times, required resourcefulness to ensure that the site met code requirements. These new. developments were
required to meet Village code requirements or receive~relief from regulations. A case in point is the Menards
Home Improvement Center where a combination of above and below ground storage was used to store storm
water. Another example is the Northwest Electric store under construction at 600 E. Rand Road. Northwest
Electric is using large (8-foe0 diameter pipes to store storm water underground.
In comparison, the property at 1 W. Rand Road is difficult to develop because the adjacent angled roads create an
unusual shaped lot. Furthermore the site slopes slightly downward (one-foot difference from the highest to the
lowest point) along the southwest property and the receiving sewer has a shallow depth. These factors limit the
location of the detention facility, its depth, and size because the detention facility has to be consistent with the
existing site conditions and be compatible with the existing sewer infrastructure. Therefore, the petitioner is
seeking an exception to the Development Code requirement for the location of the storm water detention facility.
The petitioner is not seeking relief from the amount of detention required or the manner in which the facility
needs to be constructed.
Exception to the Development Code Request
IDOT requires that detention facilities are located ten feet, plus 1.5 times the depth of the detention basin, from an
IDOT right-of-way. To meet this standard, the petitioner proposes to locate the detention area behind the
building, but closer than the Village's minimum requirement (25 feet from a structure). The proposed detention
area is directly adjacent to the structure. The petitioner is seeking an exception to the Village's twenty-fi~'e foot
requirement to meet IDOT's setback regulations. The petitioner is seeking relief from Village requirements
because the subject property is located between two IDOT roads that have the potential to be widened. Therefore,
it is unlikely that IDOT would appro, vea request to locate the detention facility in close proximity.to the existing
right-of-way because it would create an un~afe situation if either of the roads is widened.
Village staff has met with the petitioner, the architect, and the engineer for the project. Several different storm
water detention facility designs were reviewed and evaluated before coming to the conclusion that the petitioner's
proposed design is the most appropriate design for the site. The Village's Engineering Division reviewed the
petitioners request and found that there is an alternative way to design the site that meets IDOT and Village codes
without requiring an exception to the Village's Development Code requirements. The petitioner has stated that the
design that meets Development Code regulations is impractical to maintain and requires installing over 500 feet
of three-foot by nine-foot concrete box sections.
The design (specifically the Iow height of the concrete boxes) has the potential to reduce the effectiveness of the.
sewer system if sediment and debris enter the storage pipes. Extensive maintenance and several catch basins are
necessary to make this design effective. Otherwise, the code-complying storm water detention facility will not
work as.intended, perhaps not having'the capacity to handle mn-off effectively and consequently create defects to
the overall sewer system.
Development Code Exc~ption ~ .
In order .for the Village to. approve an exception to Development Code requirements, per. See. 16.111 of the
Development Code, the petitigner'is required to show that. there are alternate feasible means, of ful~lling the
" .. Development Cod~.regu~ilitions and that approving the exception wdl not impact the health, safety,~.and,welf/ii/of
ount Prospect Plan Commission
PC-08-99/Development at Rand & Kensington Roads (Development Code Exception) Page 3
the community. The petitioner has explored alternative designs with Village staff. The consensus was that the
storm water detention facility design that meets code is difficult to maintain, while the proposed design that
requires an exception to the Development Code can be implemented in a manner that is in keeping with the intent
of Development Code regulations. This has prompted the Planning staff to evaluate the necessity of See.
16.405.F. 1, the location for above ground storm water detention facilities.
The Engineering Division reviewed the petitioner's design and found that it meets the intent of the Development
Code requirements and does not pose a safety bnTard to the neighborhood or the building. Therefore, the
proposed storm water detention facility is acceptable and appropriate for 1 W. Rand Road.
Furthermore, the Building Commissioner reviewed the petitioner's proposed design and concurred with their
Structural Engineer's findings that it is easily possible to construct the retail center in the manner presented, and
that the foundation will not be impacted by the adjacent storm water detention facility. Additional hydrostatic
pressure calculations are required for a building permit and will be provided at the appropriate time.
Corridor Improvements
Consistent with previous requests for relief from code requirements, this case provides the Village with an
opportunity to work with the petitioner to create an enhancement to this property. In this ease, the property is
visible from several major thoroughfares and is located in a high-profile commercial area. The petitioner is
already working with a design firm to create a landscape plan for 1 W. Rand Road that is compatible with the
Village's proposed Corridor Design Guidelines. Therefore, it is feasible, although not a condition of approval, for
the Village to request that the petitioner's landscape plan be designed and implemented in a manner that is
6onsistent with the proposed Corridor Design Guidelines and exceed the minimum amount of landscaping
required by Village code.
Recommendation
The standards for an exception listed in the Development Code require that the petitioner arrive at alternative
feasible means of fulfilling the purpose of the regulations. Furthermore, the Plan Commission and Village Board
may approve and grant an exception if the spirit of the code is met and the alternative does not affect the public
health, safety and welfare. The petitioner's request for an exception to Sec. 16.405.F.1 of the Development Code
to locate a detention facility closer than the minimum distance required by Village code meets the standards for an
exception because the prOposed design' is feasible and.fulfills the purpose of the regulations. The petitioner has
adequately explored alternate development designs for the property, supporting the need for an exception to the
Development Code. The proposed storm water detention facility will be designed in a manner that does not
impact the Structural integrity of the building and includes safety previsions, i.e. decorative 48" tall fence and
"escape" ramp. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the petitioner's request to locate the detention facility
closer than 25 feet from the structure, for the property located at 1 W. Rand Road, Case No. PC-08-99 and that the
petitioner's landscape plan is designed in a manner that is consistent with the Village's proposed Corridor Design
Guidelines:
I concur:
Director of Community Development
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: PLANNER JUDY CONNOLLY
FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER CHUCK LINDELOF
DATE: MARCH 22, 2000
SUBJECT: PC-8-99; EXCEPTION FOR DETENTION POND LOCATION
(KENSINGTON ROAD & RAND ROAD)
We have completed our review of the latest response to our comments concerning PC-
8-99. The applicant is requesting an exception from the Development Code
requirement that stormwater detention ponds be located at least 25' from any structure
(Section 16.405.F.1). As in previous submittals, the applicant has submitted a plan
showing a detention pond against the side of the proposed structure. In fact, the wall of
, the building acts as the wall of the pond. Previous review comments have stated that
alternative designs are available, and that the requested Code exception is not
warranted.
The information contained in the current submittal reflects discussions held with the
engineer, Mr. Walter Graft of Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc., on February 28 and
March 9,. 2000. At those meetings; Mr. Graft explained the difficulties of providing
stormwater detention on site at least 25' from the proposed building, as required by the
Development Code. These diffiCulties are summarized below:
1. The site is small, so there is not a lot of area to locate a detention pond on site.
2. The site is triangular with two of the sides bordered by roads under the
jurisdiction of the Illinois DePartment of Transportation (IDOT). IDOT has
specific requirements concerning the offset of detention ponds from their dghts of
.... way, so. the available area for the pond 'is further reduced.
3.The depth of the receiving sewer is relatively shallowl limiting the depth of a
pond or the size of any undergroUnd storage pipe.
Mr. Graft claims that these difficulties create a hardship that prevent the applicant from
.. meeting'the 25? detentiOn pond setback.requirement.
· :, .,,? ..ln'0Ur review cornments~ated;¢~an.i~arY-.¢8, 2000;~we suggested one possible.alt~ate
· ~':'"' 'design,"Th'i~ deslg~i wodi;d n~i~."e t~ sto~age'~)fthe'detenti0n pond While me:~n~
Page 2
PC-8-99
March 22, 2000
the 25' pond setback requirement. The remainder of the storage would be located in 4'
tall concrete box sections.
Apparently, the survey information provided in eadier submittals was in error. The
invert of the receiving sewer is higher than first indicated, so the 4' tall concrete box
section we suggested will not work. According to Mr. Graft, the tallest section that can
be installed is 3' tall. In the meeting on February 28, Mr. Graft explained that installing
3' tall concrete box sections would be proh~itively expensive, and would create a
severe maintenance problem.
We concur with Mr. Graft that reducing the pond to meet the Code and installing 3' tall
box sections to provide the required storage would be expensive; we estimate that
approximately 525' of 3' x 9' concrete box sections would be required. We do not
concur with Mr. Graft's assessment of the maintenance problems. Additional catch
basins could be installed to trap any sediment and debris before entering the storage
pipes, greatly reducing the maintenance problem. Thus, the only hardship appears to
be the cost of the box sections.
In our review comments dated December 17, 1999, we stated that the reasons behind
the 25' setback of detention ponds from buildings are twofold:
1. The detention pond will, obviously, collect all stormwater from the site.
Therefore, the ground in and near the pond will be prone to be saturated to a
greater degree and a greater frequency than ground away from the pond. This
saturated ground can exert increased hydrostatic forces on the foundation. Also,
excessive settlement may occur in soils where the water table rises and falls
frequently. Locating the pond away from any structure will reduce any adverse
effects of the soil near the pond being saturated frequentlY.
The proposed design actually used the building foundation wall as one wall of
the pond. Consequently, significant hydrostatic pressures would act directly on
the wall during every heavy rain event.
2. A safety hazard may be created if a pond is located near an exit from a building.
However, it was pointed out in the meeting on March 9 that the proposed pond could by
designed to address these two (2) concams. The hydrostatic forces of the water acting
on the wall of the proposed building could be accurately predicted and compensated for '"
in the design. Steps can be taken to minimize any settlement of the soil caused be
fluctuations in the water table.
Also, the proposed pond is little different from a swimming pool. As such, appropriate
· . safety measures could be taken to insure that the pond is not a Safety hazard.. These
.. measures would include installing a fence along the perimeter of the pond, and a.ramp
· '. i. ~ alonzO.the westside of the pond. The,fen~cewould,provide a barrier,to keep people out
age 3
PC-8-99
March 22, 2000
of the pond, while the ramp would provide an accessible way out of the pond for those
who intentionally climb over the fence.
The site plans submitted show the "escape ramp" in the pond, and note the fence
around the pond. The amhitectural plans also clearly show a 48" tall fence around the
pond. No structural plans or calculations were provided to vedfy that the hydrostatic
forces have been accounted for in the proposed design. (Please note that a more
detailed review of the proposed structure will be performed when the applicant submits
for a building permit.)
Summary
Section 16.405.F. 1 of the Development Code states that detention ponds must be
located at least 25' from any structure. This requirement was adopted to protect
structures from damage, and prevent the pond from posing a safety hazard to anyone
exiting the structure. While the proposed design does not meet the setback
requirement, it does accomplish the two objectives of the setback requirement. The
Engineering Staff has no objection to granting the Development Code exception based
upon engineering issues. It should be pointed out, however, that since a detention
system could be designed to comply with the Village Codes, the only hardship
demonstrated is a financial hardship due to the increased cost for the underground
storage areas.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call.
Chuck Lindelof
~ UB LICWORK~SYS 2~FILES~ENGIN EER~EV-ENG\IWRa nd~PC-8-99\Com-3.doc
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department - Building Division
MEMORANDUM
TO: JUDY CONNOLLY, AICP, PLANNER
FROM: WILLIAM G. GEORGE, BUILDING COMMISSIONER ~'
/
DATE: MARCH 20, 2000
SUBJECT: PC-08-99/DEVELOPMENT CODE EXCEPTION / 1 W. RAND ROAD
The Building Division does not have any comments regarding this project at this time, however be advised that
detailed engineering plans will be required for the issuance of the building permit. In theory this detention should
not pose a problem to the proposed foundation. We will look at structural calculations for the hydrostatic pressure
that will be placed against the foundation walls at high water level.
Document2
3/15/2000 12:10 6303578490 STRUCTURAL RESOURCES PAGE 01
~1.5/00
311 W. Sut~ior
Su~410
chie~o,~,~5~o
GEWALT-HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
850 Forest Edge Drive s.E~.o, oF
VERNON HILLS, ILLINOIS 60061 C^LCU~Dev
(847) 478-9700
FAX (847) 478-9701 C,ECK£O.¥ o^'rE
SCALE
GEWALT-HAMILTON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~
850 Forest Edge Drive SHEET ~O Or
VERNON HILLS, ILLINOIS 60061 CALCULATED BY ~'~'~ DATE
(847) 478-9700
FAX (847) 478-9701 CHECKED aY OATE
SCALE
Gewalt - Hamilton Associates
?ROmCT # 2991.000 SURFACE DETENTION
DATE: 01-04-00
Surface Detention MOUNT PROSPECT RETAIL
Mount Prospect, Illinois
2991 SURFACE DE.T EOF - 6'/1.55
Structure Area Depth EOF Volume Volume
tO structure
(sq. ft) (ft) (cf) (Ac.fO
CB#9 950 0.55 174 0.004
MH#8 2430 0.55 446 0.010
MH#7 1740 0.55 319 0.007
CB#5 780 0.35 91 0.002
EX MR 1400 0.63 294 0.007
TOTAL 1324 0.030
2~I SURFACE DET
GHA DETENTION MWRD CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: Mount Prospect Retail DATE: 1/4/00
Village of Mount Prospect PROJECT NO: 2991.000
TOTAL PROPERTY, EXISTING AND PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE
DESCRIPTION User Input Program Output
BASIN AREA 1.95 ACP~
TIME OF CONCENTRATION 0.20 CFS/ACRE
ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE 0.39 CFS
AREA @ 0.25 0.00 ACRES
AREA @ 0.50 0.55 ACRES
AREA @ 0.95 1.40 ACRES
AREA @ 1.00 0.00 ACRES
DEV. C FACTOR 0.823 FACTOR
TIME 100 YR R. ATE * FLOW IN STORAGE RATE STORAGE DEPTH
0.17 10.02 8.247 8.047 1.368
0.33 7.3 6.008 5.808 1.917
0.5 5.6 4.609 4.409 2.205
0.67 4.65 3.827 3.627 2.430
0.83 4 3.292 3.092 2.567
1 3.56 2.930 2.730 2.730
1.5 2.7 2.222 2.022 3.033
2 2.24 1.844 1.644 3.287
3 1.62 1.333 1.133 3.400
4 1.3 1.070 0.870 3.480
5 1.1 0.905 0.705 3.527
6 0.95 0.782 0.582 3.492
7 0.84 0.691 0.491 · 3.440
8 0.76 0.626 0.426 3.404
9 0.69 0.568 . 0.368 3.311
10 0.64 0.527 0.327 3.268
MAXIIVIUM DETENTION DEPTH ~USER TRANSFERRED DATA~ 3.527
INCHES
TOTAL DETENTION VOLUME (PROGRAM RESULT) 0.573 ACRF_,-~'~:T
24956 CUBIC FEET
· Source: Illinois State l~uIletin 70
COMlVI~G- I~
[ Offsite detention release routed through project site J
DESIGN AN OI{FICE AS A I~ESTRICTOR MSD BASED C'd FACTORS
User Input Program Output
HI WATER ELEV 673.68 FEET
INVERT/LWL 669.86 FEET
C'd SEE BELOW 0.82 FACTOR'
RESTRICT. DIA 3 INCHES
Q ALLOWABLE 0.280 CFS FOR SITE
SYSTEM HEAD 3.69 VERTICAL FEET
ORFICE AREA 0.022 SQ. FT.
3.19 SQ. IN.
ORFICE DIA. 2.0 IN. DIA.
SELECTED
DIAMETER 3.00 IN. DIA.
ACTUAL
RELEASE 0.621 CFS RELEASE
FACTORS FOR C'd RELEASE RATES
BASED ON MSD CRITERIA
Q = C'd * A * (64.4 * Head)'0.5
Square Edged 0.79-0.82
Round Edged 0.93-0.98
Sha_rp Edged 0.58-0.64
Projecting Edge 0.50
GOING - OUT
DESIGN AN ORFICE AS A RESTRICTOR MSD BASED C'd FACTORS
User Input Program Output
HI WATER ELEV 671.55 FEET
INVERT/LWL 665.46 FEET
C'd SEE BELOW 0.82 FACTOR
RESTRICT. DIA 3 INCHES
Q ALLOWABLE 0.280 CFS FOR SITE
SYSTEM HEAD 5.96 VERTICAL FEET
ORFICE AREA 0.017 SQ. FT.
2.51 SQ. IN.
ORFICE DIA. 1.8 IN. DIA.
SELECTED
DIAMETER 3.00 IN. DIA.
COMBINED
RELEASE 0.789 CFS RELEASE
FACTORS FOR C'd RELEASE RATES
BASED ON MSD CRITERL~
Q = C'd * A * (64.4 * Head)'0.5
Square Edged 0.79-0.82
Round Edged 0.93-0.98
Sharp Edged 0.58-0.64
Projecting Edge 0.50
Combined Site Release 0.789 CFS. '
Offsite Bypass Release 0.621 CFS
Actual Site Release 0.168 CFS
Okay, less than allowable 0.28 CFS release
KENSINGTON ROAD
A R C H I D E A S
Architecture
Planning ,]:~ ~UNI'TY DEVELOPME~',ri' DET
April 19, 2000
~EC~VED
Mr. William J. Cooney, AICP
Director of Community Development
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Re: I West Rand ROad- Recall Center ~PC 08-99
Dear Bill:
I spoke with Mike Blue last night following the Village Board Meeting and understand that
requests to waive the second reading of an ordinance are directed to your office.
The Owner of 1 West Rand Road, James Kaplan of KAP-SUM Properties, LLC is requesting
that the second reading of the ordinance for PC-08-99 be waived.
Please give me a call at (312) 951-1106 if you require any additional information.
Sincerely,
ARCHIDEAS, INC,
cc: Jim Kaplan, James Kaplan Companies, Inc. (847) 681-1412
File
311 West Superior
Suite 410
Chicago, Illinois 60610
312.951.1106 Fax 951.0442
4/28/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING AN EXCEPTION
FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16)
FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1 WEST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, KAP-SUM Properties, L.L.C. (hereinafter referred to as the Petitioner)
is the owner of the property generally located at 1 West Rand Road (hereinafter
referred to as Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
Unity Resubdivision being a subdivision of Lot 1 in Doyle's Subdivision, being
in the Southwest Quarter of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range t 1, East
of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested an exception from Section 16.405.F.1 of
Chapter 16 (Development) of the Village Code to locate a storm water detention
facility closer than twenty-five feet (25') from the structure to be occupied.
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the
request for an exception from Section 16.405,F. 1 of Chapter 16 (Development Code)
for the Subject Property at their regular meeting on Apdl 5, 2000, said requests being
the subject of PC 08-99, and by 4-1, with the Village Board of Trustees voting 5-0,
recommends approval of the exception from Chapter 16 as requested; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the ~'ecitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate herein as
findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property an exception from Section
16.405.F.1 of Chapter 16 (Development) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to
allow the location of a storm water detention facility closer than twenty-five feet (25')
from the structure to be occupied.
Page 2/2
1 W. Rand Road
SECTION THREE: Except for the modification granted herein, all other
requirements of said Development Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ., 2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
4/6/00
4/13/00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5095
ESTABLISHING A SISTER CITIES COMMISSION
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2000, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
approved the passage of Ordinance No. 5095 which establishes a Sister Cities Commission to
recommend pollicies and establish programs for the Village's participation in the Sister Cities
International Organization.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Chapter 5 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, and entitled
"Creation and Membership", is hereby further amended by deleting the first paragraph of Section
5.1502 and adding a new paragraph which shall be and read as follows:
"Sec. 5.1502 CREATION AND MEMBERSHIP.
There is hereby created a permanent Commission, which sha~l be known as the Sister
Cities Commission of the Village, consisting of fifteen (15) members, a majority of whom
shall be residents of the Village, . The
members of the Sister Cities Commission shall be appointed by the Village President with
the consent of the Board of Trustees. In addition, the Village President sha~l serve as an
ex officio member of the Sister Cities Commission."
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage,
approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of . ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Community Development Department
MEMORANDUM
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
·
FROM: WILLIAM J. COONEY JR., DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY D
DATE: APRIL 25, 2000
SUBJECT: PLAT OF VACATION- NE CORNER OF BUSSE AVE. AND WILLE STREET
Attached to this memorandum is a Plat of Vacation for a portion of public right of way located at the NE corner of
Busse Avenue and Wille Street. The total land area proposed to be vacated is 96 square feet. Staff is proposing
the vacation as part of a purchase agreement with adjacent land owner, Robert Meersman. The Village is
subsequently purchasing the rear 24' of Mr. Meersman's lot to construct a public parking lot as part of the
Residences at Village Centre project.
During our negotiation with Mr. Meersman for the acquisition of the rear portion of his property, he inquired if
the the Village would in turn sell back the subject right of ~vay in order to "square off" his property. The area
proposed for vacation is currently part of the existing parking lot on the Meersman property and has been utilized
in this manner for several years. Mr. Meersman will purchase this property from the Village at the same rate ($16
per square foot) that the Village is paying for his property.
Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their
May 2~d meeting. Staffwill be present at the meeting to further discuss this matter.
H:\CDADM1N~lLL~vlEMOS\platofvacation-will¢.doc
PLAT OF VACATION
LOT 1 ~
MEERSMAN RESUBDIVISION
IN MOUNT PROSPECT ~ -' ~
RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1986 ~
DOCUMENT NUMBER LR35-61-889
P.O.B.
(M) $4.17~(R)
R=50.O0'
CH=33.37'(M) 33.51'(R)
~ S19°26'51"E
WILLE STREET
~./--HEREBY VAOATEB
35.24'
7.66' o' 36"w.
N51°55'O1 "W ' ~- N. 'LINE OF BUSSE AVE- AS
DEDICATED BY DOCUMENT
5.o2' BUSSE AVENUE NO.
S89' 10~36"~
(HERETOFORE DEDICATED)
Area to be vacated
wd
4~26~00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE VACATING CERTAIN PROPER'FY (PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY)
OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined
that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by vacating
that portion of unimproved right of way, legally described as follows:
THAT PART OF WlLLE STREET LYING WESTERLY OF AN ADJOINING THE
WEST LINE OF LOT 1 IN MEERSMAN RESUBDIVISION IN MOUNT
PROSPECT BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF
SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD
PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED
IN THE REGISTRAR'S OFFICE OF COOK COUNTY, ON OCTOBER 27, 1986
AS DOCUMENT LR35-61-889; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE
SOUTH 00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST
LINE OF SAID LOT 1 SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF WILLE
STREET, 94.50 TO A POINT OF CURVATURE AND THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 34.03 FEET ALONG THE LAST
DESCRIBED LINE, BEING THE ARC OF A CIRCLE CONCAVE
NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET AND WHOSE CHORD
BEARS SOUTH 19 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 51 SECONDS EAST 33.37 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF BUSSE AVENUE AS DEDICATED BY
DOCUMENT NUMBER 342070, SAID POINT LYING 35.24 FEET WEST (AS
MEASURED ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF BUSSE) OF THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 36
SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 5.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH
51 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST 7.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH
00 DEGREES 08 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST 26.82 FEET TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS; and
generally located at the northeast corner of Busse Avenue and Wille Street, Mount
Prospect, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the public right of way being the subject of this Ordinance shall benefit
adjacent property owners; and
Page 2/2
Vacation, Busse & Wille
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined
that the Village of Mount Prospect has no need for that portion of right of way being the
subject of this Ordinance, and that the best interests of the Village will be served by
donating the vacated right of way to the owner of Lot 1 in the Meersman Subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have
determined that the best interests of the Village would be served by vacating the public
right of way legally described hereinabove and that ownership of the property being the
subject of this Ordinance will benefit the owner of Lot 1 in the Meersman Subdivision.
SECTION TWO: That upon passage and approval of this Ordinance by a two-thirds
vote of the corporate authorities, the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
file a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with a copy of the Meersman Plat of
Resubdivision indicating the vacation parcel being the subject of this Ordinance, with
the Cook County Recorder of Deeds.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
!
~-.-~ ~ Mount Prospect Public Works Department
~( INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 26, 2000
SUB J: SURPLUS EQUIPMENT SALE ORDINANCE.
Attached is a proposed ordinance for the disposal of Village-owned surplus property that
no longer has any apparent use. The articles for sale will be limited to office equipment,
portable equipment, etc.; no vehicles will be sold. The sale will be held at the Public
Works Facility in conjunction with the 21st Annual Public Works Open House on May 20,
2000.
All items will be sold as is. Buyers will be encouraged to remove their purchases from
the premises the day of the sale. If a buyer is unable to remove purchases the same
day, arrangements can be made temporarily store the purchases at the Public Works
Facility for a period of up to one (1) week from the date of sale. Arrangements to
remove purchases after the day of sale will be made by appointment only.
I request that this ordinance be presented to the Village Board during their regularly
scheduled meeting on May 2, 2000. I also request that the second reading of the
ordinance be waived so that the sale can be publicly advertised in advance.
Se ---~Dorsey
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY
OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of
the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no longer necessary or useful to, or for the
best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect to, retain ownership of the
personal property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect to sell said personal property as described in Exhibit A
at a public sale to be held on Saturday, May 20, 2000, at 9:00 AM;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois Municipal Code,
Illinois Revised Statutes, C24, Section 11-76-4, the Mayor and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the personal property described in the
attached "Exhibit A" now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, is not longer
necessary or useful to the Village of Mount Prospect and the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be served by its sale.
SECTION TWO: Pursuant to said Section 11-76-4, the Village Manager or his
designate is hereby authorized and directed to sell the aforementioned personal
property now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, at a public sale on
Saturday, May 20, 2000, at 9:00 AM at the Public Works Facility, 1700 West
Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
SECTION THREE: The Village Manager is hereby authorized and may advertise
the sale of the aforementioned personal property in a newspaper published
within the community before the date of said public sale.
SECTION FOUR: No offer which is less than the minimum price set forth in the
list of property to be sold shall be accepted.
SECTION FIVE: Upon payment of the full price, the Village Manager or his
designate is hereby authorized and directed to convey and transfer title to the
aforesaid personal property to the purchaser.
PW Sale
Page 2 of 2
SECTION SIX: Any items remaining unsold after the above date may be
disposed of by the Village Manager or his designate in a manner which is in the
best interests of the Village.
SECTION SEVEN: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, by a vote of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities, and
approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day ~ ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Village Clerk
H:\GENffi[es\WIN\ORDiNAN C\PWsale.doc
2000 SURPLUS FURNITURE
ITEM # DESCRIPTION NOTES
1 4-Drawer fireproof file Metal
2 4-Drewer fireproof file Metal
3 2 card file + 4 drawer file Metal
4 5-Drawer file Metal
5 5-Drawer file · Metal
6 5-Drawer file Metal
7 3-Drawer file Metal
8 3-Drawer file Metal
9 4-Drawer file Metal
10 2 card file + 2 drawer file Metal
11 1-Drawer lateral file Wooden
12 2-Drawer lateral file Wooden-no top
~13 2-Drawer lateral file Wooden-no top
14 2-Drawer lateral file Wooden-no top
15 4-Drawer lateral file Metal
16 2-Drawer lateral file Metal
17 Table (20 x 36) Metal
18 48" round table Metal
19 60" x 30" table Metal
20 84" x 39" table top w/glass Damaged
21 72" drafting table Metal
22 66" credenza
23 72" x 36" desk Wooden
24 26" right hand desk return Wooden
25 36" W. x 30" H. bookcase
26 72" couch Black
27 drafting stool
28 Visitor chair Beige
29 Visitor chair
30 Visitor chair Beige
31 Visitor chair Beige
32 Sled type chair .
33 36" x 16" wall hung cabinet
34 36" x 16" wall hung cabinet
35 Technicolor road show
36 48" x 39" street display
37 32 x 57 metal desk
38 4-Drawer vertical file cabinet Metal
39 3-Drawer vertical file cabinet Beige (metal)
40 5-Drawer vertical file cabinet Beige (metal)
41 2-Drawer vertical file cabinet Brown (metal)
42 5-Drawer vertical file cabinet Gray (metal)
43 5-Drawer vertical file cabinet Creme (metal)
"Exhibit A"
44 2-Drawer vertical file cabinet Beige (metal)
45 6-Drawer vertical file cabinet Yellow (metal)
46 4-Drawer vertical file cabinet Beige (metal)
47 5-Drawer vertical file cabinet Beige (metal)
48 5-Drawer vedical file cabinet Creme (metal)
49 5-Drawer vertical file cabinet Creme (metal)
50 5-Drawer vertical file cabinet Creme (metal)
51 5-Drawer vertical file cabinet Creme (metal)
52 3-Drawer vertical file cabinet Beige (metal)
53 3-Drawer vertical file cabinet Beige (metal)
54 3-Drawer vertical file cabinet (on wheels) '- Beige (metal)
55 2-Drawer vertical file cabinet Beige (metal)
56 2-Drawer vertical file cabinet Brown (metal)
57 2-Door rolling printer cabinet off-white (metal)
58 2-Drawer lateral file cabinet Wooden
59 Upright plan file Beige (metal)
60 2-Door upright printer cabinet Beige (metal)
61 36" x 48" bookcase Wooden
62 36" x 72" bookcase Wooden
63 36" x 42" bookcase Wooden
64 36" x 29" sliding door cabinet Wooden
65 18" x 29" rolling 1 door cabinet Wooden
66 36" x 15" wall hung cabinet Brown
67 36" x 15" wall hung cabinet Brown
68 42" round table E~rown (wooden)
69 26 x 20 end table
70 60" office work table
71 Rolling typing table
72 54" coffee table Wooden
73 36" x 24" office work table
74 56" desktop shelf unit Black (metal)
75 Left-handed desk return Black (metal)
76 72" desk Wooden
77 66" x 24" desk Cherrywood(metal)
78 48" x 30" desk Metal
79 36" x 60" Steel desk w/glass top
81 64" 4-drawer lateral file Wooden
82 3 burner coffee maker Bunn
83 72" black couch Fabric
84 lamp
85 IBM printer Laser Print E
86 80" vertical blind rod
87 72" x 36" storage shelves Metal
88 29' of partitions 6 - 6' pieces Tan fabric
89 26' of partitions 8 - various sizes Grey fabric
90 68" x 30" kitchen cabinets w/top Blue/green
91 48" x 24" kitchen cabinets w/72" top Blue/green
92 76" x 17" kitchen cabinets w/top, sink & fauce Grey/putty
93 Set of 2 visitor chairs i Beige fabric
94 Sled type chairs/set of 2 Brown
95 Secretary Chair Rose
96 Visitor Chair Black
97 High back manager's chair Brown
98 High back manager's chair Brown
99 Secretary Chair Blue
100 Secretary Chair Blue
101 Manager's chair Brown
102 Manager's chair Tan
103 Classroom chair Wooden
104 Adding machine Monroe 2125
105 Set of 2 - 2 drawer card files Black
106 2 Drawer card file Beige
107 38" x 30' Typing Table Wood Grain
108 36" x 65' 5 drawer lateral file Grey
109 8 Drawer card file Grey
- 110 Secretary Chair Red
111 Electric Typewriter iBM
112 Paper Cutter Green
113 Paper Cutter Grey
114 Cassette Transcriber Panasonic
115 Coin/Cash Box
116 3 Hote Punch
117 Adding machine T.I. 5630
118 FAX Sharp FO-215
119 Slide Sorter
120 Adding machine Sharp CS-1680
121 Label Maker DYMO 1570
122 Assorted correction tapes
123 Slide projector deck
124 Box of assorted casters E.R. Wagner
125 ~ Wireless Intercoms NOVI
126a iTyping Tables Brown
126b Typing Tables Brown
127 Flag w/stand
128 3' Banquet Table Brown
129 Assorted deskop accessories
130 Automatic fax switch Radio shack
131 19" x 36" Table cover Native American
132 Typewriter IBM
133 Desk Lamp
134 486 66mhz 16 MG wi15" monitor and keyboard
135 486 100mhz 32 MG w/15" monitor and keyboard
136 Exercise Bike Air Dyne
137 Microwave Oven
138 12 pieces misc. desk accessories
140 Framed Picture 2 Deer 20" x 17"
141 Framed Picture Water Tower Place 23" x 18"
142 Framed Picture 2 Ducks 27" x 23"
143 Framed Picture Piazza Colonna 24" x 30"
144 Framed Picture Earth From Moon 23"x 19"
145 Framed Picture Orchid 28" x 25"
146 2 Framed Prints French Buildings 12"x 15"
147 Framed Picture Tree 10" x 12"
148 2 Framed Prints Ducks 12" x 10"
149 Framed Picture Pigs 11" x 9"
150 Framed Picture Apples on Table 11" X 9"
151 Assorted picture frames (5)
152 Panasonic W J-5500 Special Effects Generatc Needs Repair
153 Knox Panorama Projection Screen Good Condition
154 Amiga 2500 Computer Needs Repair
155 Sony PVM-8000 8" Color Monitor w/battery Needs Repair
156 Hamilton Desk Lamp Good Condition
157 Poleroid 600 Land Camera Good Condition
158 University Sound 1820 AM/FM Tuner Good Condition
159 Panasonic VCR Needs Repair
160 Intercom Unit
Mount Prospect Public Works Department ~.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM T~ crr~ t~
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. SANONIS
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 19, 2000
SUBJECT: IDOT RESOLUTIONS:
RAND/EUCLID/ELMHURST SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT
TRAIN STATION LOT IMPROVEMENTS
On February 21, 2000~ the Mayor signed letters of concurrence of the draft joint agreements for
the above-referenced projects. The Rand/Euclid/Elmhurst sidewalk improvement is being
funded by $83,200 of United States Federal Highway Administration funds and $50,000 of State
of Illinois "Legislative Add-On Program" funds. Likewise, for the train station lot improvements,
$130,000 is coming from the state's "Legislative Add-On Program." Both projects require no
matching funds from the Village.
We have now received the final agreements from the State, and they are requesting they be
signed and returned to them for processing. I am therefore requesting two separate resolutions
be prepared by the Village Clerk and presented to the Village Board at their May 2, 2000 meet-
ing for adoption. Both resolutions would authorize the Mayor to sign the IDOT agreements.
GRA/td
c: Deputy Director of Public Works Sean P. Dorsey
Village Engineer Jeff Wulbecker
X:\FILES~RONTOFI~IDOT~Funding for Rand-Euclid.Elmhurst Sidewalk lmpr and Train Sta lot impr.doc
VWL
4/25/00
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2000, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount
Prospect determined that it was in the best interest of the Village to participate in the
Rand/Euclid/Elmhurst sidewalk improvement program funded by the United States
Federal Highway Administration and the State of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement being the subject of this Resolution specifies the funding
agreed to by the United States Federal Highway Administration and the State of Illinois.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the Village Clerk is
authorized to attest his signature on the Agreement between the Village of Mount
Prospect and the Illinois Department of Transportation, being the subject of this
Resolution. A copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION 'rwo: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
Mount Prospect (V) 99-00131;00-SW
Local Agency Agreement Fund Type
for Federel Participation
State Contract I DayLabor I LocalContract I RRForceAccount
This Agreement is made and entered into between the above local agency (LA) and the state of Illinois, acting by and through its
Department of Transportation. hereinafter referred to as "STATE". The STATE and LA jointly propose to improve the designated location as
shown below. The improvement shall be constructed in accordance with plans approved by the STATE and the STATE's policies and
procedures approved and/or required by the United States Federal Highway Administration hereinafter referred to as FHWA.
Location
Local Name Rand Road Route US 12 Length
Termini At Euclid Street-IL 83 (Elmhurst R~)ad~ sidewalk.
Current Jurisdiction
Project Description Existing Str. No. N/A
Division of Cost (SEE ATTACHED)
Type of Work FHWA % State % LA % Total
Participating Construction
Non-Participating Construction
Preliminary Engineering
Construction Engineering
Right of Way
Railroads
Utilities
TOTAL
NOTE: The above costs are approximate and subject to change~ The actual costs will be used in the final division of cost for billing and
reimbursement. If funding is not a percentage of the total, place an asterisk in the space provided for the percentage and explain below.
The Federal share of construction engineering may not exceed 15% of the Federal share of the final construction cost.
Local Agency Apprepriation
The LA on . appropriated, by separate resolution, ordinance or road improvement statement.
to pay the LA'S share of the cost and will appropriate additional funds, if required tb cover the LA's total
cost. LA's share of the cost to be paid with [] MFT Funds [] Other Funds. ·
Method of Financing (State Contract Work)
METHOD A--Lump Sum (95% of LA Ol~ligation)
METHOD B-..~.. Monthly Payments of
· METHOD C---LA's Share divided by estimated total cost multiplied by actual progress payment.
(See page two for details of the above methods and the financing of Day Labor and Local Contracts)
'.'Construction , Engineering, I Ri~htif-Way
Job Number I Project Number I Job Number I Project Number Job Number Project Number
C-~1-166-99 I CMF-CMM-O00S(33) I
Agreement Provisions
THE LOCAL AGENCY AGREES:
(1) To acquire in its name, or in the name of the state if on the state highway system, all right-of-way necessary for this project in
accordance with the requirements of Titles II and Iii of the Uniform Relocation Assistance, and Real Property Acquisitien Policies
Act of 1970, and established state policies and procedures. Prior to advertising for bids, the LA shall certify to the STATE that all
requirements of Titles II and Ill of said Uniform Act have been satisfied. The disposition of encroachments, if any, will be
cooperatively determined by representatives of the LA, and STATE and the FHWA, if required.
(2) To provide for all utility adjustments, and to regulate the use of the right-of-way of this improvement by utilities, public and
private, in accordance with the current Utility Accommodation Policy For Local Agency Highway and Street Systems.
(3) To provide for surveys and the preparation of plans for the proposed improvement and engineering supervision during
construction of the proposed improvement.
(4) To retain jurisdiction of the completed improvement unless specified otherwise by addendum (addendum should be accompanied
by a location map). If the improvement location is currently under road district jurisdiction, and addendum is required
(5) To maintain or cause to be maintained, in a manner satisfactory to the STATE and FHWA, the completed improvement, or that
portion of the completed improvement within its jurisdiction as established by addendum referred to in item 4 above.
(6) To comply with all appliceble ExecutiVe Orders and Federal Highway Acts pursuant to the Equal Employment Opportunity and
Nondiscrimination Regulations required by the U.S. Depariment of Transportation.
(7) To maintain, for a minimum of 3 years after the completion of the contract, adequate books, records and supporting documents
to verify the amounts, recipients and uses of all disbursements of funds passing in conjunction with the contract; the contract and
all books, records and supporting documents related to the contract shall be available for review and audit by the Auditor General
and the department; and the LOCAL AGENCY agrees to cooperate fully with any audit conducted by the Auditor General and the
department; and to provide full access to all relevant materials. Failure to maintain the books, records and supporting documents
required by this section shall establish a presumption in favor of the STATE for the recovery of any funds paid by the STATE
under the contract for which adequate books, records and supporting documentation are not available to support their purported
'disbursement.
(8) To provide if required, for the improvement of any railroad-highway grade crossing and rail crossing protection within the limits of
the proposed improvement;
(9) To compty with Federal requirements or possibly lose (partial or total) Federal participation as determined by the FHWA;
(10) (STATE Contracts Only) That the method of payment designated on page one will be as follows:
Method A - ' Lump Sum Payment. Upon award of the contract for this improvement, the LA will pay to the STATE, in lump
sum, an amount equal to 95% of the LA's estimated obligation incurred under this Agreement, and will pay to
the STATE the remainder of the LA's obligation (including any nonparticipating costs) in a lump sum, upon
completion of the project based upon final costs.
Method B - Monthly Payments. Upon award of the contract for this improvement, the LA will pay to the STATE, a specified
amount each month for an estimated period of months, or until 95% of the LA's estimated obligation under the
previsions of the Agreement has been paid, and will pay to the STATE the remainder of the LA's obligation
(including any nonparticipating costs) in a lump sum, upon completion of the project based upon final costs.
Method C - Progress Payments. Upon receipt of the contractor's first and subsequent progressive bills for this
improvement, the LA will pay to the STATE, an amount equal to the LA's share of the construction cost divided
by the estimated total cost, multiplied by the actual payment (appropriately adjusted for nonparticipating costs)
made to the contractor until the entire obligation incurred under this Agreement has been paid.
(11 ) (Day Labor or Local Contracts) To provide or cause to be provided all of the initial funding, equipment, labor, material and
services necessary to construct the complete project.
(12) (Preliminary Engineering) In the event that right-of-way acquisition for, or actual construction of the project for which this
preliminary engineering is undertaken with Federal participation is not started by the close of the tenth fiscal year following the
fiscal year in which this agreement is executed, the LA will repay the STATE any Federal funds received under the terms of this
Agreement.
(13) (Right-of-Way Acquisition) In the event that the actual donstruction of the project on this right-of-way is not undertaken by the
close of the twentieth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which this Agreement is executed, the LA will repay the STATE any
Federal Funds received under the terms of this Agreement.
ILocalAgency Se~on
Mount Prospect (V) 99-00131-00-SW
Page 2
IL 494-0327
(14) And certifies to the best of its knowledge ahd belief its ~ffiCiais:
(a) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from'covered
transactions by any Federal department or agency:
(b) haven~twithioathree-yearperi~dpreceding-thisAgreementbeenconvictad~f~rhadacivi~judgmentrendered-
against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obta!ning, attempting to obtain or performing a
public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust
statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bdbery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements receiving stolen property;
(c) are not presently indicted for or.otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federel~ State, local) with
commission of any of the offenses enumerated in item (b) of this certification; and
(d) have not within a three-year period preceding the Agreement had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, local)
terminated for cause or default;
(15) To include ~e certifications, listed in item 14.above and all other certifications required by State statutes, in every contract,
including procurement of materials and leases of equipment.
(16) (STATE Contracts) That execution of this agreement constitutes the LOCAL AGENCY's concurrence in the award of the
construction contract to the responsible low bidder as determined by the STATE.
(17) That for agreements exceeding $100,000 in federal funds, execution of this Agreement constitutes the LOCAL AGENCY's
certification that:
(a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an oificar or employee
of Congress or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making
of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment or modification of any Federal contract,
grant, loan or cooperative agreement.
(b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting
to influenca an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress or an
employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying', in accordance with its
instructions.
(c) The LOCAL AGENCY shall require that th~ language of this certification be included in the award documents for ail
subawards at all ties (including subcontracts, subgrants and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and
that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
(18) To regulate pa~king and traffic in accordance with the approved project report.
(19) To regulate encroachments on public right-of-way in accordance with current Illinois Compiled Statutes.
(20) To regulate the discharge of sanitary sewage into any storm water drainage system constructed with this improvement in
accordance with current Illinois Compiled Statutes.
THE STATE AGREES:
(1) To provide such guidance, assistance and supervision and to monitor and perform audits to the extent necessary to assure
validity of the LA's certification of compliance with Titles II.and iff requirements.
(2) (STATE Contracts) To receive bids for the construction of the proposed improvement when the plans have been approved by the
STATE (and FHWA, if required) and to award a contract for construction of the proposed improvement, after receipt of a
satisfactory bid.
(3) (Day Labor) To authorize the LA to proceed with the construction of the improvement when Agreed Unit Prices are approved and
to reimburse the LA for that portion of the cost payable from Federal and/or State funds based on the Agreed Unit Pdces and
Engineer's Payment Estimates in accordance with the Division of Cost on page one.
(4) (LOCAL Contracts) That for agreements with Federal and/or State funds in engineering, right-of-way, utility work and/or
construction work:
(a) To reimburse the LOCAL AGENCY for the Federal and/or State share on the basis of periodic billings, provided said billings
contain sufficient cost information and show evidence of payment bY the LOCAL AGENCY.
(b)To pro,~ide independent assurance sampling, to furnish off-site material inspection and testing at sources normally visited by
· STATE inspectors of steel, cement, aggregate, structural steel and other materials customarily tested by the STATE.
LocalAgency Section
Mount Prospect (V) ~ 99-001,31-00-SW
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
(1) That this agreement and the covenants contained herein shall become null and void in the event that the FHWA does not approve
the proposed improvement for Federal-aid participation or the contract covet/ng the construction work contemplated herein is not
awarded within three yearn of the date of execution of this Agreement.
(2) This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their successom and assigns.
(3) It is the policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation that Minority Business Enterprises, as defined in 49 CFR Part 23, shall
have the maximum opportunity to participate in the pedormance of contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal funds
under this Agreement. Consequently the MBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this agreement.
The STATE/LA agrees to ensure that minodty business enterprises, as defined in 49 CFR Pert 23, have the maximum
opportunity to participate in the performance of this Agreement. In this regard the STATE/LA shall take all necessary and
reasonable steps, in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23, to ensure that minodty business enterprises have the maximum
opportunity to compete for and perform portions of contracts and subcontracts financed in part with Federal funds provided under
this Agreement. The STATE/LA shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the selection and
retention of contractor or subcontractors including procurement of materials and leases of equipment.
The LA shall include the provisions of this 'Policy' in every contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment.
Failure to carry out the requirements set forth above shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and may result in termination of
the Agreement or such remedy as deemed appropriate.
(4) This Agreement shall be administered under the provisions of the STATE's federally approved Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise Program.
(5) In cases where the STATE is reimbursing the LOCAL AGENCY, obligations of the STATE shall cease immediately without penalt~
or further payment being required if, in any fiscal year, the Illinois General Assembly or appliceble Federal Funding source fails to
appropriate or otherwise make available funds for the work contemplated herein.
ADDENDA
Additional information and/or stipulations ara hereby attached and identified berow as being a part of this Agreement.
Number 1 Location MaD
(Insert addendum numbers and titles as applicable)
The LA further agrees, as a condition of payment, that it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions set forth in this Agreement
and all addenda indicated above.
APPROVED APPROVED
State of Illinois
Name Gereld Farley Department of Transportation
Title . Mayor ~ By
County B~ee~je~Chairperson/Mayor/V'~llage Pre sidenJ,~;./ Director of Highways
Sianat --.- . ~ / , ~ ~r j Date
NOTE: Signature by APPOINTED officials REQUIR,E/a resolution authorizing said appointed official to execute this agreement.
ILocalAgency .. Section
'Mount Prospect (V) 99-0001~1-00-SW
S:tGen\Wp2Lt21 amatprosp¢ctjtagmt, doc
Page 4
IL 494'0327 BLR 4251 (Rev. 10/9!
RANGE 11 EAST
VWL
4/25/00
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS, on February 21, 2000, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount
Prospect determined that it was in the best interest of the Village to participate in a
train station lot improvement program, financed with State of Illinois "Legislative Add-
On Program" funds; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement being the subject of this Resolution specifies the funding
agreed to by the State of Illinois, with no funding provided by the Village of Mount
Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the Village Clerk is
authorized to attest his signature on the Agreement between the Village of Mount
Prospect and the Illinois Department of Transportation, being the subject of this
Resolution. A copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TVVO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ., 2000.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe, Village Clerk
REIMBURSABLE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of , A.D. by and between the STATE OF
ILLINOIS, acting by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter called the STATE,
and the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, in the County of Cook in the State of Illinois, hereinafter called the
LOCAL AGENCY.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the parties hereto, in the interest of the safe and efficient movement of vehicular and pedestrian
traffic, are desirous of streetscaping along Northwest Highway between Route 83 and Emerson in the VILLAGE,
said improvement to be identified as Section 00-00136-00-LS and STATE Job No. C-91- - 00, and hereinafter
referred to as the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the 91st General Assembly appropriated by Public Act 91-20 (SB 630), Article 24A, Section
71 to the Department of Transportation $10,924,000 from the Fund for Illinois' Future tO the Department of
Transportation for preliminary engineering and construction engineering and contract costs of constmction; and
WHEREAS, the Illinois State Senate designated $130,000 of the appropriated $10,924,000 to be used for
streetseaping in Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS the parties hereto are desirous of said PROJECT in that same will be of immediate benefit to
the residents of the area and permanent in nature; and
WHEREAS, the STATE and LOCAL AGECNY wish ~o avail themselves of $130,000 appropriated by
Public Act 91-20, Senate Bill 630, Article 24A, Section 71 to the Department of Transportation for this PROJECT;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein the parties hereto agree as
follows:
I. THE LOCAL AGENCY AGREES:
1. To prepare or cause to be prepared, the plans, specifications and contract documents; advertise for, receive
bids and award the contract for the construction of the PROJECT, in accordance with the methods
prescribed by the STATE, and cause the p~oject to be built following MFT procedures as found in the
Manual of Administrative Policies of the Bureau of Local Roads & Streets in accordance with the plans,
specifications and contract as approved by the STATE.
2. To certify to the STATE that all necessary right-of-way for the PROJECT has been obtained (if right-of-
way is required) or that no additional right-of-way is required.
3. To exercise its franchise rights to cause private utilities to be relocated at no expense to the STATE.
4. To maintain, for a minimum of 3 years after the completion of the contract, adequate books, records, and
supporting documents to verify the mounts, recipients, and uses of all disbursements of funds passing in
conjunction with the contract; the contract and all books, records, and supporting documents related to the
contract shall be available for review and audit by the Auditor General; and the LOCAL AGENCY agrees
to cooperate fully with any audit conducted by the Auditor General and to provide full access to all relevant
materials. Failure to maintain the books, records, and supporting documents required by this section shall
establish a presumption in favor of the STATE for the recovery of any funds paid by the STATE under the
contract for which adequate books, records, and supporting documentation are not available to support their
purported disbursement.
5. To maintain or cause to be maintained, in a manner satisfactory to the STATE, the completed
improvement.
II. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
1. The disposition of encroachments, if any, shall be cooperatively determined by representatives of the
LOCAL AGENCY and the STATE.
2. That the estimate Division of Costs of the PROJECT are:
TYPE OF WORK STATE (%) VILLAGE (%) TOTAL
Streetscaping $130,000. (100%) -0- $130,000.
TOTAL $130,000. -0- $130,000.
3. The STATE agrees to pay 100% of the costs, up to a maximum amount of $130,000 for the PROJECT
from FY 2000 Illinois' Future Fund, based upon the awarded contract amount. Any funds required to
complete the PROJECT in excess of the $130,000, will be the responsibility of the LOCAL AGENCY.
The STATE will pay the LOCAL AGENCY 95% of its share of the construction and engineering costs
upon award of the contract by the LOCAL AGENCY and receipt of a letter certifying such award and
requesting said payment. The balance will be reimbursed upon completion of the improvement and
acceptance by the STATE.
2
4 Obligations of the STATE shall cease immediately without penalty or further payment being required if, in
any fiscal year, the Illinois General Assembly or applicable Federal Funding source fails to appropriate or
otherwise make available funds for the work contemplated herein or if the contract covering the work
contemplated herein is not awarded within three years subsequent to execution of the agreement.
5. The d6partment shall furnish to the LOCAL AGENCY a sign identifying the contract as an Illinois' FIRST
project. The sign will be installed by the LA at the beginning and ending limits of the project in
accordance with instructions provided by the department. Within 30 days after project completion the
signs shall be returned to the department.
6. The LOCAL AGENCY will comply with the requirements of the Illinois State Agency Historic Resources
Preservation Act, the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act, the Interagency Wetland Policy Act of
1989 and the Illinois Farmland Preservation Act.
7. This agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefits of the parties, their successors and assigns.
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Reimbursable agreement to be executed in
quintuplicate counterparts, each of which shall be considered as an original, by their duly authorized officers as of
the dates below indicated.
Executed by the VILLAGE, the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
day of ,
Mayor
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
APPROVED BY STATE OF ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BY:
Director of Highways
Date
S:\C~n\Wp2\I 31 arlrmprospeetrelmbagmLdo¢
4
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM CHF 00-40
CONTROL NUMBER
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER ~'] ~ ~.,] {~
TO:
FROM: CHIEF OF POLICE ~
SUBJECT: 1999 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT PUBLIC HEARING /
/
DATE: 25 APRIL 00
For the third consecutive year, the Police Department has applied for a federal Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG). This grant is a formula grant where the award is based on
the number of criminal offenses handled by the department. Under the provisions of the 1999
LLEBG, the department is eligible to receive an award of $16,226. This grant also requires a
Village "match" of $1,623.
The department applied for this grant with the intention of using the award to buy police
equipment; specifically, in-car laptop computers. These computers would be purchased to
accelerate the department's on-going efforts to replace its in car mobile data terminals with
laptop computers. The 1999 LLEBG award would enable the department to complete this
process. The department chose this purpose area for the grant funds from the following seven
purpose area options: supporting law enforcement (including the purchase of equipment);
enhancing security measures at special risk locations; establishing or supporting drug courts;
enhancing the adjudication of cases involving violent offenders; establishing multi-jurisdictional
task forces; establishing community crime prevention programs; and obtaining indemnification
insurance for police officers.
The 1999 LLEBG application carried two main requirements: 1) that the department form an
Advisory Board to review the proposed allocation of the grant funds and, 2) that a Public
Hearing be held on the proposed use of the grant award funds. The Bureau of Justice
Administration (BJA), which is responsible for overseeing the grant, specified the Advisory
Board must include representatives from the following organizations (I have included the name
of the person chosen to represent each organization):
1. The local law enforcement agency. (Crime Prevention Unit Officer Bill Roscop)
2. The local prosecutor's office: (Village prosecutor Everette Hill)
3. The local court system: (Presiding Judge of the Third District Court, Joseph J. Urso)
4. The local public school system: (Prospect High School Dean Patricia Tedaldi-Monti)
5. A community group active in crime prevention: (Neighborhood Watch Program
representative Tarina Wimmer)
Page 1 of 1
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT GHF00-40
FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUIvlBER
Officer Roscop, the chairperson, reported the Advisory Board unanimously endorsed the purpose
area for the grant funds selected by the department in its original grant application, that is, the
purchase of equipment or technology directly related to basic law enforcement functions.
The Public Hearing requirement is intended to encourage public input on the proposed use of the
grant award. Specifically, the department is seeking either public approval for purchase of in-car
laptop computers or suggestions for alternative uses for the grant award. Although the grant
stipulates the final decision for the use of the funds lies with the Chief of Police, all public
comments, suggestions and recommendations will be given due consideration.
If the Public Hearing does not result in a compelling reason to amend the department's chosen
purpose area for the grant funds, the department will notify the BJA that it has satisfied the grant
application requirements and will request the release of the grant funds.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.
Page 2 of 2
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ~ crrf t~s~
M"r'
TO: V,L,_*GE MA,AGER M,C,AEL E. JA,O,,S Z
FROM:DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 20, 2000
SUBJ: WELLER CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
REACH A2
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Weller Creek is severely eroding along approximately 2,500 feet of its channel length
between Route 83 and School Street. The length of the creek between these two (2)
streets is actually almost 3,000 feet. However, a 500' section of this reach was the
subject of a bank stabilization project in 1998. The 500' section repaired in 1998
stretches from the Emerson Street vehicular bridge to a point approximately 100 feet
west of the Main Street pedestrian bridge. This section of creek has been identified as
Reach A1
The remainder of the creek in this area is called Reach A2. All of Reach A2 is actively
eroding. Reach A2 is the primary subject of the proposed streambank stabilization
project presented in this memorandum
The primary causes of erosion in Reach A2 have been: · Increased runoff due to urbanization of the watershed.
· Invasion of vegetation unsuitable for bank stabilization.
· Mechanical augmentation of the channeldepth.
· Presence of unstable, sandy, silty, soils.
If left unchecked, erosion in this reach will result in continued loss of land as well as
increased sedimentation of the creek channel and downstream waters. Similarly, utility
disruptions and property damage caused by undermined bank trees falling on utility
conduits and private property will also increase.
BACKGROUND
Weller Creek is an urban stream with headwaters at its intersection with Central Road.
The watershed consists of the southeast portion of the Village of Arlington Heights, as
well as the northwest side of Mount Prospect. Flows in the project area of Weller Creek
vary from 1,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during a 10-year storm to 2,000 cfs during a
100-year storm. Soils in the area are primarily Sawmill Silty Clay Loam. The Des
Plaines River receives all waters from Weller Creek.
Before residential development of the watershed, the channel was straightened .to
facilitate agricultural drainage. Now, due to increased flOWS caused by urbanization, the
Page 2 of 6
Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project, Reach A2
Apd120, 2000
channel is reproducing its natural meander by eroding adjacent private property and
creating steep 12-foot high banks.
All of Reach A (including both Reach A1 and Reach A2) dissects a residential
neighborhood comprised of single-family homes. The backyards or sideyards of all the
homes along the creek extend to the channel bank.
Wel/er Creek Ad Hoc Committee
During the summer of 1995, the Mayoi and Board of Trustees convened the Weller
Creek Ad Hoc Committee as part of an effort to solicit public involvement in the
resolution of the Weller Creek streambank erosion problem. This group was comprised
of Mount Prospect residents owning property adjacent to the creek. Over the course of
ten months, this committee worked with Village staff and channel stability experts from
Earth Tech, Inc, a professional consulting engineering firm, to identify the sources of
streambank erosion and develop a publicly palatable, environmentally sound, cost
effective, plan to stabilize the creek banks. This work included a physical examination of
over 2 miles of Weller Creek, from School Street to the headwaters at Central Road, as
well as several site visits to observe both bioengineered solutions and "hard
engineering" structural solutions. In addition, this group convened several public
meetings to discuss the project and made two (2) public presentations to the Village
Board. This effort culminated in a final concept report recommending streambank
stabilization in multiple phases utilizing non-structural, bioengineering techniques to the
greatest extent practical. The Mayor and Board of Trustees received and endorsed this
recommendation at a public meeting on June 25, 1996.
We//er Creek Streambank Stabilization Project, Reach A1
Reach A1 was the highest priority identified in the Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee's
final concept report. Repair work in this reach included raising the deck elevation of the
Emerson Street vehicular bridge, replacing the Main Street pedestrian bridge, installing a
sheet pile retaining wall on the south bank, and stabilizing the north bank with a-jacks
and a permanent erosion control blanket seeded with flood tolerant grasses. In addition,
monoslab and geoweb pavers were placed to stabilize the creek bottom. These
improvements were completed during the 1998 summer construction season at a cost of
$1,243,883. $500,000 worth of funding for this project was provided by a grant from the
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Earth Tech provided design engineering and
construction engineering services for this project.
Illinois First Grant
Reach A2 (the balance of Reach A), was identified as the second priority along Weller
Creek. Unfortunately, no funding was available to continue bank stabilization work once
Reach A1 was completed. Furthermore, staff estimated that no funding would be
available for streambank stabilization until at least 2006. As a result, the ad hoc
committee went on hiatus and plans .for stabilizing the rest of Reach A were placed on a
shelf.
However, through the efforts of State Representative Carolyn Krause, the Village has
recently been able to secure a $1,000,000 grant for Weller Creek streambank
stabilization work from the Illinois First program. This grant, combined with
Page 3 of 6
Waller Creek Streambank Stabilization project, Reach A2
April 20, 2000
approximately $1,600,000 of available Flood Control Construction Fund money, now
makes it possible to resume streambank stabilization efforts in Reach A2.
DISCUSSION
On December 21, 1999, the Village Board authorized Earth Tach to perform a pre-
design survey in the Reach A2 area. The purpose of this survey was to identify all of the
property and right-of-way issues associated with bank stabilization work in this area.
Specifically, Earth Tach was charged with accurately identifying the location of the creek
and establishing its relationship with existing rights-of-way, easements, and private
property lines. Furthermore, Earth Tech was also asked to evaluate existing field
conditions and develop a specific plan for stabilizing this section of the creek utilizing
streambank stabilization techniques endorsed by the Waller Creek Ad Hoc Committee in
their 1996 final concept report.
Earth Tech's research revealed that the eastern part of the reach (between Emerson
Street and School Street) presents challenges that are very different from those found in
the western part of the reach (between Route 83 and Main Street).
East Branch
To begin with, the creek channel in the eastern part of the reach is basically centered
within a 60' wide right-of-way. As such, there are no encroachments upon private
property and there is no need to acquire additional right-of-way. Furthermore, though
the banks are steep and high in this part of the reach, the channel has enough width that
it is possible to stabilize the banks by installing a-jacks to firm up the toe and then
regrading the banks to at least a 1:1-1/2 slope. The regraded banks would then be
covered with a permanent erosion control blanket and seeded with flood tolerant
grasses. In order to perform this work, and promote the growth of bank grasses, the tree
canopy in this part of the reach will have to be removed.
West Branch
The creek channel in the western part of the reach runs through a 30' wide creek right-
of-way. The existing creek channel, however, is easily 60' wide from top of bank to top
of bank. For the most part, the south half of the channel runs across a 30' wide drainage
easement on the private parcels adjacent to the south bank of the creek. Needless to
say, the banks are very sheer in this part of the creek. Stabilization efforts in this area
are complicated further by the fact that the banks contain numerous sandy/silty soil
seams and there are some homes in close proximity to the banks.
To stabilize the banks in the westem part of the reach, Earth Tach recommends
installing a sheet pile retaining wall along the entire south side of the channel from the
Route 83 bridge wing wall to the western terminus of the sheet pile walt installed as part
of the 1998 bank stabilization project. In addition, Earth Tach also recommends
installing a sheet pile retaining wall along the north side of the channel from the Route
83 bridge wing wall to point just opposite the Village-owned lot at 208 West Hiawatha
Trail. Installing a-jacks along the toe and regrading the slope would stabilize the
remainder of the north bank. A permanent erosion control blanket would then be placed
on the north bank and the entire slope would be seeded with flood tolerant grasses. The
installation of the sheet pile retaining walls and the need to get sunlight on the north
Page 4 of 6
Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project, Reach A2
Apd120, 2000
bank grass would also necessitate the removal of the tree canopy in this part of the
reach as well.
Estimated Project Cost
Earth Tech estimates that the total cost to stabilize the banks in both the east part and
west part of Reach A2 is approximately $2,200,000. This estimate does not include any
fees for design engineering or construction engineering.
Staff Recommendations
Staff recommends that the any bank stabilization efforts in the western part of this reach
include provisions for cleaning up the complicated property dghts issues that affect the
creek in this area. Specifically, staff recommends that the Village establish a 50' wide
creek right-of-way between Route 83 and Main Street by combining the existing 30' wide
right-of-way with an additional 20' of right-of-way created by the donation of land from
private property owners adjacent to the creek. For the most part, the additional 20' is
land that the creek channel already occupies so the impact on property owners is
debatable at best. Most of the property that is needed is on the south side of the
channel. However, there is also a need to acquire some property from two (2)
homeowners on the north bank in order to mitigate the impact of the creek's bend near
14 West Hiawatha. Homeowners adjacent to the south bank already have a 30' wide
easement for the creek platted on their parcels. In return for donating the land, staff
recommends that the Village vacate the remainder of the drainage easement thereby
relinquishing external interest in 10' of land for the homeowners along the south bank.
To sweeten the deal, staff also recommends that the Village accept responsibility for
property transfer costs associated with the establishment of the new creek right-of-way.
Staff also recognizes that the loss of the tree canopy in this reach will affect the
aesthetics of the neighborhood. To compensate, staff recommends that each property
owner adjacent to the proposed project area be offered a landscape allowance. Each
homeowner could use their allowance to install a landscape screen of their own design
along their rear property lines adjacent to the creek right-of-way. Homeowners would
pick plantings from a pre-approved list of bushes and Iow growing trees that will support
the new habitat created by the streambank stabilization treatments. The plantings would
be installed by a single landscape contractor hired by the Village as part of the
streambank stabilization project.
Finally, staff also recommends that the project be phased over two (2) years. It is not
possible to complete all of the work in both the eastern and western parts before the end
of the 2000 construction season. Therefore, staff proposes to fix the western part of the '
reach (between Route 83 and Main Street) this year and the eastern part (between
Emerson Street and School Street) in 2001. Following is the project schedule proposed
by staff:
Award Design Contract May 2, 2000
Bid Opening June 27, 2000
· Start Construction in A2 West July 31, 2000
Complete Construction in A2 West November 15, 2000
Start Construction in A2 East March 2001
Complete Construction in A2 East October 2001
Page 5 of 6
Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project; Reach A2
Apd120, 2000
Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee
Earth Tech's findings and staff's recommendations were presented to the Weller Creek
Ad Hoc Committee on March 22, 2000. A copy of the minutes of that meeting are
attached for your reference; In summary, the ad hoc committee agreed with Earth
Tech's proposed concept design and endorsed staff's recommendations.
Resident Meetings
On April 3, 2000 a public meeting was held at the Public Works Facility to explain the
proposed improvements to Weller Creek 'residents living between Route 83 and Main
Street. A similar meeting was held on April 5, 2000 for residents living between
Emerson Street and School Street. Flyers publicizing the meetings were hand-delivered
to affected residents pdor to both meetings. 23 homes were notified prior to the April 3
meeting and 17 residents attended. 32 homes were notified pdor to the April 5 meeting
and 22 residents attended that meeting. Although there was some apprehension about
tree loss, the consensus opinion of residents attending these meetings seemed to
support the project as defined herein.
PROPOSAL
Since funds are available and there appears to be substantial public support for this
project, staff recommends proceeding with bank stabilization efforts along Weller Creek.
The next step in the process is to prepare detailed construction drawings, bid
specifications, and contract documents. There is also a need to arrange plats of
subdivision and other documents necessary to establish the new creek right-of-way.
Finally, there is a need to review received bids and make an award recommendation.
Staff has requested and received a proposal from Earth Tech to perform all of these
tasks. Earth Tech's fee for this work is an amount not to exceed $166,725.
RECOMMENDATION
Earth Tech has been the engineer on this project since it's inception in 1995 and, to
date, the results of their recommendations and designs have accomplished our goal to
stabilize the banks of Weiler Creek. Earth Tech provided both design engineering
services and construction inspection services for the Weller Creek Streambank
Stabilization Project, Reach A1 in 1998. The Village received three (3) separate awards
for that project recognizing its unique blend of hard engineering solutions (sheet pile
retaining wall) and bioengineering treatments. More importantly, the 1998 project has
been well received by Weller Creek residents and we continue to receive compliments
on the project to this day.
Furthermore, Earth Tech's fee for design is consistent with the industry norm for the
design of specialized civil engineering projects. Typically, we expect design fees for
these types of projects to be approximately 10% of the estimated construction cost.
Earth Tech's fee of $166,725 is approximately 7-1/2% of the estimated construction cost.
It is the opinion of staff that Earth Tech's fee is competitive, responsive, and indicative of
their desire to continue working with the Village to complete the Weller Creek
streambank stabilization projects.
age 6 of 6
Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project, Reach A2
April 20, 2000
Therefore, it is my recommendation that we accept Earth Tech's proposal to perform
design engineering for Reach A2 of the Weller Creek Streambank Stabilization Project
for a fee not to exceed $166,725. Funding for this proposed expenditure is available in
account number 5907704-690101 ($171,500) and account number 5907704-690102
($2,420,000) on Page 287 of the current budget.
With your approval, it is our intention to solicit Village Board concurrence with this
position at the May 2, 2000 Village Board meeting.
Sean P. Dorsey//
I concur.
Glen R. An~'ler
Director of Public Works
Cc: Director of Public Works Glen R. Andler
SPD/spd
C:~CREEKS\WELLER\PHASE 2\PHASE 2 DESIGN MEMO TO MJ.DOC
Village of Mount Prospect
Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee
Meeting of March 22, 2000
PRESENT: Peter Hegel, 204 W. Hiawatha Trail (Ad Hoc Committee)
Elizabeth Hegel, 204 W. Hiawatha Trail (Ad Hoc Committee)
Dolores Hanvey, 10 W. Hiawatha Trail (Ad Hoc Committee)
Susan Wasmund, 200 E. Hiawatha Trail (Ad Hoc Committee)
Maureen Majems, 205 East Berkshire Lane (Ad Hoe Committee)
Grace DeVito, 701 South Main Street (Ad Hoe Committee Chair)
Mel Buetmer, 503 South Owen Street (Weller Creek Drainage Dist.)
Daniel Schnitta, 911 South Lancaster (Weller Creek Drainag~ Dist.)
Fred Thulin, 4 South Owen Street (Weller Creek Drainage Dist.)
Kurt Lindstrom - EarthTech, Inc.
Melcy Pond - Earth Tech, Inc.
Glen R. Andler - Director of Public Works
Scan P. Dorsey - Deputy Director of Public Works
ABSENT: Scott Davis (Ad Hoc Committee)
Phil Johnson (Ad Hoc Committee)
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson DeVito called the meeting to order at 7:10 PM.
OLD BUSINESS:
A. PRESENTATION OF EARTH TECH SURVEY RESULTS AND FINAL
CONCEPT PLANS.
Public Works Director Glen Andler explained that Earth Tech has been hired by the
Village to perform a pre-design survey of Weller Creek between Route 83 and Main
Street and between Emerson Street and School Street. Mr. Andler noted that, pursuant to
the 1996 Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee Final Report, these sections are the next ones
slated for rehabilitation as part of the Village's creek streembank stabilization program.
Specifically, Earth Tech was asked to accurately identify the existing location of the
creek and how that location relates to property lines, fight-of-way lines, and easements in
the project area. Earth Tech was also asked to examine the topography and geology of
the area and render a concept plan for repairing the channel.
Melcy Pond stated that the entire creek channel in the project area can be characterized as
a waterway with high, steep, banks covered by invasive, non-native, plants and trees.
The bank soils are sandy are not suited for supporting the sheer slopes.
In general, erosion along Weller Creek occurs bemuse normal, Iow flows constantly and
consistently undermine the toe of the slopes creating cavities under the waterline. During
high flows, the unsupported slopes cannot withstand the hydraulic forces and bank
failures occur. In some cases, the failures have been dramatic. Sections of bank and
entire trees have slid into the creek channel. Over the years, this type of erosion has
Village of Mount Prospect Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee
resulted in significant loss of property, utility disruptions, and the degradation of water
quality in downstream waters.
Earth Tech's research revealed that the eastern part of the reach (between Emerson Street
and School Street)presents challenges that are very different from those found in the
western part of the reach (between Route 83 and Main Street). To begin with, the creek
channel in the eastern part of the reach is basically centered within a 60' wide right-of-
way. As such, there are no encroachments upon private property and there is no need to
acquire additional right-of-way. Furthermore, though the banks are steep and high in this
part of the reach, the channel has enough width that it is possible to stabilize the banks by
installing a-jacks to firm up the toe and then regrading the banks to at least a 1:1-1/2
slope. The regmded banks would then be covered with a permanent erosion control
blanket and seeded with flood tolerant grasses. In order to perform this work, and
promote the growth of bank grosses, the tree canopy in this part of the reach will have to
be removed.
The creek channel in the western pa~t of the reach runs through a 30' wide creek right-of-
way. The existing creek channel, however, is easily 60' wide from top of bank to top of
bank. For the most part, the sOUth half of the channel runs across a 30' wide drainage
easement on the private parcels adjacent to the south bank of the creek. Needless to say,
the channel is very narrow in this part of the reach and the banks are sheer. Stabilization
efforts in this area are complicated further by the fact that there are numerous sandy/silty
soil pockets and there are some homes in close proximity to the banks.
To stabilize the banks in the western part of the reach, Earth Tech recommends installing
a sheet pile retaining wall along the entire south side of the channel from the Route 83
bridge wing wall to the western terminus of the existing sheet pile wall. In addition,
Earth Tech also recommends installing a sheet pile retaining wall along the north side of
the channel from the Route 83 bridge wing wail to point just opposite the Village-owned
lot at 208 West Hiawatha Trail. Installing a-jacks along the toe, regrading the slope, and
seeding the bank with flood tolerant grasses would stabilize the remainder of the north
bank.
Ms. Pond emphasized that extensive tree removals will be necessary in both the east and
west branches of this reach. She explained that trec removals will be necessary as a
matter of procedure in order to install the bank stabilization treatments. The contractor
will either remove or severely damage most of the bank trees as part of the process of
installing the sheet pile wall or regrading the slopes. Furthermore, once the bank
stabilization treatments are installed, the bank slopes will need greater exposure to
sunlight in order to promote and sustain the growth of flood tolerant grasses.
Ms. Pond also explained that Public Works staff has suggested the idea of providing each
affected homeowner with a "landscaping allowance". The Village would fund the
allowances as part of the project. Each affected homeowner would then be able to design
their own landscape buffer by selecting bushes and/or trees from a pre-approved list. The
selected trees and bushes would then be installed along the property lines adjacent to the
creek right-of-way as part of the Village's project. The pre-approved list of plantings
would be established by the Village and will consist primarily of bushes and trees that
will provide a top-of-bank visual screen but will not create a dense canopy over the creek
channel. The exact amount of the landscaping allowance has not yet been determined.
Page 2 of 4
Village of Mount Prospect Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee
Public Works Director Andler stated that if the ad hoc committee endorses Earth Tech's
concept plans, staff intends to hold two (2) separate informational meetings to explain the
proposed project to affected residents. One meeting will be held on April 3, 2000 and the
other on April 5, 2000. The April 3 meeting will primarily concentrate on the
improvements between Route 83 and Main Street. The April 5 meeting will highlight the
improvements between Emerson Street and School Street.
Mr. Andler also observed that it seems unlikely the entire project can be completed in one
(I) construction season. Therefore, staffpmposes to organize the project along a 2-year
timeline. Work on the western branch (between Route 83 and Main Street) will start this
year and should be substantially complete by the end of November. Work on the east
reach (between Emerson Street and School Street) will start next spring and should be
· complete by November 2001. Mr. Andler commented that the west branch is the higher
priority because erosion in that part of the reach is more severe. Furthermore, there is a
need to coordinate the sheet pile wall installation with the reconstruction of the Route 83
bridge currently underway.
Elizabeth Hegel, 204 West Hiawatha Trail. Ms. Hegel asked if the Village would be
able to show residents how much private property will be necessary to establish the new
creek right-of-way. Mr. Andler responded that part of Earth Tech's contract includes
finding all existing property lines and delineating the existing easements. Once this work
is completed, Earth Tech will then identify the proposed top of bank for the post-bank
stabilization creek channel. The distance between the new top of bank and the property
line will identify the private property needed to establish the creek right-of-way.
Kurt Lindstrom added that most of the survey work has already been completed and he
has already started to mark where the new top of bank will be. He explained that he is
using blue paint or blue lathe to denote the top of bank.
Peter Hegel, 204 West Hiawatha Trail. Mr. Hegel asked Earth Tech to explain how the
height of retaining wall was determined. Melcy Pond and Kurt Lindstrom responded that
the designers should attempt to vary both the vertical and horizontal position of the wall.
It should rise and fall as well as oscillate in and out. This is done to give the wall a more
natural look. Unfortunately, the exact elevation and location of the wall cannot be
determined on a lot by lot basis until the project is much further into the design process.
Engineers will incorporate a number of factors into the wall design including grade
changes and soil geology. However, the final product should resemble the meandering
structure erected along the south bank of the creek as part of the 1998 bank stabilization
project between Emerson Street and Main Street.
Mr. Andler commented that the wall will probably be at one of its highest points near Mr.
Hegel's property. Mr. Andler explained that the bank adjacent to Mr. Hegel's property is
already very high and sheer. Since the Village is trying to limit the amount of private
property needed for the creek right-of-way, the retaining wall will essentially have to
match the existing elevations.
Susan Wasmund, 200 East Hiawatha Trail. Ms. Wasmund asked if the wall design
would incorporate the storm sewer structures that discharge into the creek. Meloy Pond
stated that they would. Mr. Andler noted that several storm sewer discharges were
incorporated into the design of the existing sheet pile wall. Ms. Pond explained that
typically, storm structures are installed behind the wall and discharged through the wall
Page 3 of 4
illage of Mount Prospect Weller Creek Ad Hoc Committee
via a fabricated hole. The structures am usually designed as "drop" manholes that allow
the water to discharge near the creek's normal water level instead of higher up the bank.
Discharging near the normal water level reduces the likelihood that the discharge will
scour the channel or opposite bank.
There being no further questions about the presentation, Mr. Andler asked the committee
to indicate whether or not they supported the project. All committee members present
made statements expressing support for the project.
OTHER BUSINESS
No other business was introduced.
NEXT MEETING
No new meetings were scheduled.
ADJOURNMENT
Them being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,/
Scan P. Dorsey
Deputy Director of Public Works
Page 4 of 4
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS
DATE: APRIL 27, 2000
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF PAYMENT FOR MOVING EXPENSES
RUSSEL SKYLES, DDS
In 1999, the Village consummated the purchase of the property known as Three West
Central as part of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. That building housed
Dr. McLean's cosmetic surgery practice and dentist offices for Drs. Skyles and Tobias.
Dr. McLean owned the building with Drs. Skyles and Tobias leasing space.
The original Purchase Contract did not provide for any specific relocation expenses. In
the interim, Dr. McLean retired from practice. His partner continues to practice at an
existing Barrington office and Drs. Skyles and Tobias relocated their dentist practices to
the old Post Office building at 200 East Evergreen in Mount Prospect. Dr. Skyles is the
lead tenant with Dr. Tobias subletting space from him. As you know, the Village has
taken the position that we would consider reimbursement for reasonable relocation
expenses occasioned by displacements caused by the Downtown Redevelopment Plan.
Dr. Skyles had submitted a request for reimbursement totaling $53,635.75 for leasehold
build-out expenses. After reviewing the sum and substance of the request, the Village
Board agreed to reimburse Dr. Skyles in the amount of $46,258.02. This figure was
agreeable to Dr. Skyles.
In order to accommodate the repayment of an outstanding construction loan, the Village
issued a check in the above amount to Dr. Skyles. Documentation, including proof of
payment and a Release, has been received from Dr. Skyles. It is, therefore, appropriate
at this time to take official Board action and ratify this expense. Funds will come from
the Tax Increment Financing budget.
c: Finance Director Doug EIIsworth MIC4~~Is
Community Development Director William Cooney
MINUTES
FLOATING COFFEE WITH COUNCIL
SATURDAY, APRIL 8, 2000
9:00 AM
LOCATION NO. I: VILLAGE HALL, 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
Mayor Gerald L. Farley called the meeting to order at approximately 9:00 AM. Trustee Timothy
J. Corcoran, Trustee Paul W. Hoefert, Trustee Richard M. Lohrstorfer, and Trustee Irvana K.
Wilks were also present. Representing Village staff were Village Manager Michael E. Janonis
and Director of Public Works Glen R. Andler. Village residents in attendance were:
Richard N. Itendrieks, 196 Christie Lane, Twin Lakes, WI 53181
Elmer Collin, 1 W. Hiawatha Tr.
Mr. & Mrs. Thomas McGough, 407 S. I-Oka Ave.
Jamie McGough, 204 S. I-Oka Ave.
Debbie McGough, 204 S. I-Oka Ave.
David Schein, 700 Ivanhoe Ln.
Mr. Richard Hendricks, 196 Christie Lane, Twin Lakes, WI, informed the Board about his
complaint against American Cab. Cab no~ 350 recently picked Mr. Hendricks up from the air-
port and, according to Mr. Hendricks, is mechanically unsafe to ride in. Mr. Hendricks claimed
he received carbon monoxide poisoning. He went to the hospital after arriving home because he
felt ill; however, ail test results were negative. Mr. Hendricks did contact American Cab's Man-
ager Mr. John Temple, who said he would investigate the mechanical condition of cab no. 350.
Mr. Thomas McGough, 407 S. I-Oka, informed the Board that he is on St. Raymond's Build-
ing Committee and wanted to thank the Village for all their support for the St. Raymond building
addition project.
Mr. Jamie MeGough, 204 S. I-Oka, had appeared before the Village Board last Tuesday re-
questing a variance for his house addition and new garage. His request was for 55% lot coverage
rather than the code-allowed 50% lot coverage.
Mayor Farley told Mr. Jamie McGough that the Village Board must exercise good judgmem
When deviating from the limits of the code.
Trustee Corcoran added that, if the Board would, freely approve variances above the limits of
the code, they .would receive hundreds of requests.
Mr. Jamie MeGough then asked why have a variance procedure.
1 of 4
X:~ILES~FRONTOFF~.DMII~COFFEE W COUNCIL 4-g-2000.DOC
Trustee Coreoran explained that variances are for hardship cases and Mr. J. McGough's request
has not demonstrated any hardship.
Trustee Hoefert stated that Village building standa/'ds have been established to maintain the
Village as it currently exists on into the future.
Mr. Jamie McGough questioned why the Community Development staff continually encour-
aged him to seek the variance even after the Zoning Board denied it; would there be no consid-
eration by the Village Board for anything over 50% lot coverage?
Mayor Farley told Mr. Jamie McGough to continue with his plan to try and reduce the impervi-
ous area by considering the driveway strips. He asked staff if they knew of any rtmoff allow-
antes for brick and/or wooden decks. Public Works Director Andler said he knew of none.
Mr. David Schein, 700 Ivanhoe, also stated that he was aware of no runofferedits for brick and
thought brick was still an impervious substance, even though it has all the joints.
Trustee Wilks suggested it might be a good time to review all the Village's zoning codes.
There being no further business to discuss, Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at approximately
10:10 AM.
2 of 4
\~PUBLICWOKK~SYS2~FILES~ONTOFF~ADMrN~COFFEE W COUNCIL 4-8-2000.DOC
MINUTES
FLOATING COFFEE WITH COUNCIL
SATURDAY, APRIL 8, 2000
10:50 AM
LOCATION 2: ST. EMILY CHURCH, 1400 E. CENTRAL RD.
Mayor Gerald L. Farley called the meeting to order at approximately 10:40 AM. Trustee Paul
W. Hoefert, Trustee Richard M. Lohrstorfer, and Trustee Irvana K. Wi[ks were also present.
Representing Village staff Were Village Manager Michael E. Janonis, Police Chief Ronald Pay-
lock, Police Officer Joe Favia, and Public Works Director Glen R. Andler. Residents in atten-
dance were:
William Bell, 222 N. Wille St.
Elizabeth Huth-Taylor, 700 E. Dogwood
Mr. Bell, 222.'N. Wille St., asked what was going on with Meadows Pool.
Village Manager Janonis told Mr. Bell that he knows that the pool will be demolished, but did
no~ know the details of the Park District's plans for a new pool. Mr. Janonis told Mr. Bell to call
Wally Cook at the Mount Prospect Park District.
Mr. Bell suggested that the Village should consider having an overpass constructed over North-
west Highway for Central Road to eliminate the traffic congestion at that intersection.
Mr. Janonis told Mr. Bell that he didn't think that would be feasible, but the state (IDOT) does
have plans to make upgrade improvements to the traffic lights at Central Road & Northwest
Highway, Central Road & Highway 83, and Highway 83 and Northwest Highway. The' lights
will all be interconnected, which should help traffic flows.
Mrs. Elizabeth Huth-Taylor~ 700 E. Dogwood, complimented the police on how well they
handled domestic disturbances. She also told the Board she is concerned about the amount of
litter in and around and coming (blowing) from the apartments along Wheeling Road.
Public Works Director Andler told Ms. Taylor that the Village's Solid Waste Coordinator Lisa
Angell regularly monitors the refuse dumpsters in this area, and he will have her check this spe-
cific area and speak with the property owners and refuse contractor about blowing debris.
Ms. Taylor told the Board she is also concerned about unsupervised children playing in that
same area. There is a lot of traffic there and a child could nm out into the street and get hurt.
Ms. Taylor asked if "Caution - Childrcm Playing" signs could be installed.
3 of 4
X:kFILES~FRONTO~MI/~COFFEE W COUNCIL 4-g-2000.DOC
ayor Farley said that was a good idea and the Public Works Departmem would look into it.
There being no further business to discuss, Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at approximately
I1:30 AM.
Respectfully submitted,
Glen R. Andler
Director of Public Works
GRA/td
4 of 4
X:~ff:ILES~FRONTOFFxADMIN~COFFEE W COUNCIL 4-8~2000.DOC
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E, Sanonis
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
Timothy I. Cor¢oran V¢lma Lowe
Paul Wm. Hoefer~
Ric M. Village of Mount Prospect
Dennis G. Prikkel Phone: 847/392-6000
Michaele W. Skowron Fax: 847/392-6022
Irvana K. Wilks 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 T99: 847/3924064
NOTICE
THE WEDNESDAY, MAY 3 AND WEDNESDAY, MAY 17, 2000 MEETINGS OF THE
PLAN COMMISSION HAVE BEEN CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT
PRIOR TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING.
Dated this 26th day of April, 2000.
MAYOR ~ VILLAGE MANAGER
Gerald L. Farley ~ Michael E. Janoni~
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK
Timothy $. Corcoran Velma Lowe
paul Wm. Hoefert
R,c d,.Lo or, Village of Mount Prospect
Dennis G. Ptikkel Phone: 847/818-5328
Michaele W. 8kowron Fax: 847/~15-5329
Irvana K. Wilk~ 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 T~)D: 847/392-6064
NOTICE
THE MONDAY, MAY 1, 2000 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD HAS BEEN
CANCELLED. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THE NEXT MEETING.
Dated this 26th day of April, 2000.