HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/05/2019 Bid Result Fairview Gardens Lift StationRehabilitation DesgnBoardDocs® Pro
Agenda Item Details
Meeting
Category
Subject
Access
Type
Preferred Date
Absolute Date
Fiscal Impact
Dollar Amount
Budgeted
Budget Source
Recommended Action
Public Content
Background
Page I of 3
5.5 Motion to accept proposal for Fairview Gardens Lift Station Rehabilitation design ant'
construction engineering in an amount not to exceed $71,900.
Public
Action
Feb 05, 2019
Feb 05, 2019
Yes
71,900.00
Yes
Water and Sewer Enterprise Fund
Accept the proposal for 2019 Fairview Lift Station Rehabilitation project design and construction
engineering as submitted by Ciorba Group of Chicago, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $71,900.
In the 2019 Community Investment Plan (CIP), there are funds available to continue the rehabilitation of the Village"s sanitary
sewer lift and relief pumping stations. These stations are used to provide relief to the Village -owned sanitary sewer system in
the event that interceptor sewers of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC) become
surcharged. The Village owns and maintains eight (8) sanitary relief stations and two (2) sewage lift stations. This project will
be the sixth (6th) sanitary lift/relief station rehabilitation as Huntington, Louis Street, William Street and both George Street
North and South rehab have been completed.
The scope of work for this proposed project includes the Fairview Lift Station situated near St. Emily School on Horner Lane.
This facility is one (1) of two (2) sanitary sewer lift stations in the Village. It de -waters the sanitary sewer system serving tht
Fairview Gardens residential subdivision.
Work will include design engineering necessary to facilitate removal of the existing pump station and replacement with a
packaged, prefabricated pump station. Design work will also include all mechanical piping, electrical modifications, and control
system programming necessary to construct a fully operational pump station.
Request for Proposals (RFPJ)
To design these improvements, staff requires technical assistance from a qualified civil engineering consultant. Accordingly,
staff prepared a detailed request for proposals (RFP) necessary to solicit these services. A copy of this RFP is enclosed.
Consulting engineers were asked to submit a technical proposal detailing the firm"s background, key personnel, and approach
to the project. In addition, each firm was also asked to submit a separate cost proposal indicating work effort anticipated and a
not -to -exceed fee. The required scope of work included inspections of the existing Fairview Lift Station; preparation of plans
and bid documents; meetings and obtaining all necessary regulatory permits. RFPs were distributed to five (5) engineering
firms with expertise in the design and construction of sanitary sewer lift stations.
Off-IRRM
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 2/6/2019
BoardDocs® Pro
Three (3) technical proposals and three (3) cost proposals were
2019 workload. Each proposal was evaluated based on the
services and scope of work, schedule work effort and proposal
for each criterion. The table below summarizes this analysis:
Technical Proposals
Page 2 of 3
received. Two (2) firms called to decline the opportunity due tit,
ackground of the firm, related project experience, proposed
ontent. Each firm received a point ranking (total points = 1007
Cost Proposals
Max. Points
Ciorba Group
Burns & McDonnell
Baxter & Woodman
Background
Burns & McDonnell
•
Experience
•
so
Ell 11
pill
1
Ell
1 1
Work effort
Ift
Cost Proposals
[=at I•
The technical proposals indicated all the participating firms were qualified to perform the work. All firms had adequate
experience and appropriately trained staff to design and implement a successful project. Accordingly, the evaluation results
were closely distributed.
The highest rated firm was Ciorba Group of Chicago, Illinois. Ciorba Group"s proposal provided numerous examples of
successful lift and/or relief station rehabilitation projects similar in scale and scope as the proposed work. Examples included
projects for the Village of Buffalo Grove, Village of Schaumburg, Village of Wheeling and Village of Wilmette. All references
checks indicated that Ciorba Group performed well. A copy of Ciorba Group"s technical proposal is enclosed.
In addition, Ciorba Group has successfully completed several germane engineering projects for the Village including design and
construction of the Huntington Lift Station Rehabilitation Project, William Street Relief Station Rehabilitation Project and Louis
Street Relief Station Rehabilitation project. Ciorba also designed and inspected the replacement of two electrical control panels
located at Melas Park. All of their work has been satisfactory.
Ciorba Group and Burns & McDonnell submitted identical fees. Copies of both cost proposals are enclosed. Although, both firms
total cost were the same, Ciorba"s hourly rate is lower than Burns & McDonnell. It is the opinion of staff that Ciorba has
allocated sufficient work effort (496 hours) to successfully execute this project.
Staff recommends including a 10% contingency in the award for this proposed contract due to the fact that time spent on
construction engineering and inspection can vary due to circumstances beyond the engineering consultant"s control. For
example, contractor delays, material availability and inclement weather are all parameters that can lengthen anticipated
construction time.
1. Accept proposal for Fairview Gardens Lift Station Rehabilitation Project.
2. Action at discretion of Village Board.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal for 2019 Fairview Lift Station Rehabilitation project design ant,
construction engineering as submitted by Ciorba Group of Chicago, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $71,900.
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 2/6/2019
Ciorba Group
Burns & McDonnell
Baxter & Woodman
[=at I•
The technical proposals indicated all the participating firms were qualified to perform the work. All firms had adequate
experience and appropriately trained staff to design and implement a successful project. Accordingly, the evaluation results
were closely distributed.
The highest rated firm was Ciorba Group of Chicago, Illinois. Ciorba Group"s proposal provided numerous examples of
successful lift and/or relief station rehabilitation projects similar in scale and scope as the proposed work. Examples included
projects for the Village of Buffalo Grove, Village of Schaumburg, Village of Wheeling and Village of Wilmette. All references
checks indicated that Ciorba Group performed well. A copy of Ciorba Group"s technical proposal is enclosed.
In addition, Ciorba Group has successfully completed several germane engineering projects for the Village including design and
construction of the Huntington Lift Station Rehabilitation Project, William Street Relief Station Rehabilitation Project and Louis
Street Relief Station Rehabilitation project. Ciorba also designed and inspected the replacement of two electrical control panels
located at Melas Park. All of their work has been satisfactory.
Ciorba Group and Burns & McDonnell submitted identical fees. Copies of both cost proposals are enclosed. Although, both firms
total cost were the same, Ciorba"s hourly rate is lower than Burns & McDonnell. It is the opinion of staff that Ciorba has
allocated sufficient work effort (496 hours) to successfully execute this project.
Staff recommends including a 10% contingency in the award for this proposed contract due to the fact that time spent on
construction engineering and inspection can vary due to circumstances beyond the engineering consultant"s control. For
example, contractor delays, material availability and inclement weather are all parameters that can lengthen anticipated
construction time.
1. Accept proposal for Fairview Gardens Lift Station Rehabilitation Project.
2. Action at discretion of Village Board.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal for 2019 Fairview Lift Station Rehabilitation project design ant,
construction engineering as submitted by Ciorba Group of Chicago, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $71,900.
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 2/6/2019
BoardDocs® Pro
4
Page 3 of 3
-- � ,�° iii � ii i ,i g it ��� i ,i g iii ,i iii -i g S ii � it the��� iii ii ��,wi� � St ti ir,i Z I[ -i �� I� ii I� i� t ti ir,i �& i' � ir�� a i��� ���: i��� � I �� �i� i��� i ��; �� �
. 24 K
�......... _
ii ilk �� Cost i � I s I� w� I ��� 44 KB)
Administrative Content
Executive Content
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 2/6/2019