HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.1 Edwin and Elsie Meyn ParkBoardDocs® Pro
Agenda Item Details
Meeting
Category
Subject
Access
Non,
Public Content
affew
p4A 24. Downtown SIIS Iash Pad
Page I of 3
This memorandum details how the Village came to own the future Edwin and Elsie (Meyn) Busse Park property, the design
firm selection process, public engagement initiatives, proposed park designs, project budgeting, and provides an outline of
the next steps in the park development process.
History
The purchase of 19 and 21 S. Emerson Street from the Busse family was authorized in April of this year. The properties
were sold under the condition that the future park be named "Edwin and Elsie (Meyn) Busse Park" and that a permanent
bench or plaque in honor of Wallace E. Busse and Marion Busse be placed in the park. The existing homes were
demolished, back filled, and restored to grass in early July to facilitate public input at the Downtown Mount Prospect Block
Pa rty.
Design Firm Selection
Staff sought proposals from private design firms in the summer of this year after closing on the properties and assuming
ownership. The Village wanted to ensure that the design process would be public in nature and that holding several
meetings and opportunities for public engagement was integral to the success of this project. Staff sought a design firm
that would lead a highly collaborative design process and after a reviewing all of the proposals, staff selected three firms to
interview for the project. The Village selected Altamanu Inc. to conduct the public engagement and design process after
interviewing the three finalists.
Public Engagement
As previously mentioned, public involvement is a focus for this project. The following list details the public engagement
events, participation, and the outcomes of those events.
Talk and Chalk - Held on July 14, staff from the Community Development Department hosted a table dedicated tl;,
gathering input on potential park amenities. A modest number of citizens attended the event. The most requeste
imenities included a splash pad, benches, and a flexible entertainment space.
Block - Held on July 27 and 28, thousands of people attended the Downtown Mount Prospect Block Party. Tl��a
Village's consultant, Altamanu, Inc., hosted a tent on the corner of Emerson Street and Busse Avenue and held many
public engagement activities. Chalk boards were hung on the construction fencing to gather public input and seating
opportunities uncommon to the area were displayed to embody the spirit of what a new park can contribute to the existing
open space network. Support flags were available to interested residents. The most requested amenities were a splash pad
or interactive water feature, outdoor lighting, for the space to be programmable and versatile, to preserve existing trees
wherever possible, and to provide seating in the park.
Stakeholder Mee - Held on August 14, Altamanu, Inc. hosted stakeholder meetings with four parties determined by
staff. The four groups represented the Downtown Merchants Association, the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce,
adjacent residents, and Village of Mount Prospect staff. Key outcomes from these meetings were that the use of the park
should be flexible in nature, but that the privacy of adjacent residents should be respected. Possible screening of adjacent
properties in the form of plantings and a potential privacy fence along the eastern property line were proposed. A large,
programmable space was requested to host non -intrusive events. A small pavilion area, catenary lighting, and a sound
system were requested as well. Staff expressed concerns about the potential cost of locating a water feature in the park
due to engineering and ongoing maintenance issues. There was a consensus that the park should be flexible and enhance
current downtown activities (e.g. Friday's on the Green, the Block Party, Irish Fest, etc.).
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 11/27/2018
BoardDocs® Pro Page 2 of 3
Public Charrette #1 - Held on September 12, Altamanu, Inc. provided handouts, surveys, and design precedents to gather
input on basic park design and amenities. Topics covered included lighting, seating, flooring, water features, plant pallets,
tree pallets, programming, pavilions, and more. Approximately twenty (20) people attended the meeting. About half of
attendees supported including a water feature, while the other half was against locating a water feature in the park due to
its cost and ongoing maintenance concerns. Strongly supported items included seat walls, traditional benches, festoon
(cafe') lighting, a large space to hold events, a pavilion, the use of concrete and pavers, and for a unique feature to be
located in the park. Altamanu, Inc. also conducted surveys that would later be posted online for public input.
Public Charrette #2 - Held on October 24, Altamanu, Inc. presented an overview of survey results, design precedent
preferences, and put forward two park design schemes ("Cut" and "Perforation") for public comment. Approximately
thirty (30) people attended the meeting. Of the two design schemes presented, "Perforation" was preferred because of its
interior pavilion location and overall functionality. However, the general shapes and appearance of "Cut" were more
desired by the public compared to the circular design of "Perforation". Amenities were similar on both plans and included a
pavilion, programmable open space, seat walls, a water feature, festoon lighting, and a nature path. The main difference
between the two schemes was that "Perforation" consisted of a circular design scheme while "Cut" utilized tangential
shapes. Another difference was that the proposed pavilion was located along S. Emerson Street in "Cut", while it had an
interior location in "Perforation' .
Survey Results
Altamanu conducted two online surveys during September and October. The first survey consisted of questions about
potential park uses and desired amenities, while the second survey used pictures to gather appearance and design
preferences. More than two hundred (200) people responded to the surveys. Survey respondents indicated that they would
most likely use the park on the weekend in the late afternoon. Recreation space that could accommodate outdoor dining
was highly desired, while community gardening and public workspace was not supported. Modern architecture and seating
was not favored, while traditional benches and seat -walls were rated positively. Festoon and decorative lighting was also
well received. Creating a pavilion or entertainment space was highly requested. Of the survey respondents, thirty-six
percent (36%) did not want a water feature, forty-nine percent (49%) wanted a water feature, and fifteen percent (15%)
were neutral in their response.
Proposed Plans
Altamanu, Inc. combined the layout of the "Perforation" scheme with the tangential shapes of the "Cut" scheme to create
the two concepts presented tonight for your review. The first concept includes a splash pad, while the second concept
proposes a pavilion, lighting, and more.
Concept #1 - Splash Pad - The proposed splash pad consists of pavers, multiple jets, boulders, and a recirculating water
system with storage tanks. The remainder of the park would consist of walking paths, trees, benches, seat walls, a raised
lawn space, and a shrub border to screen the park from adjacent properties. A unique picnic table that provides electrical
outlets, and various repurposed logs are also proposed as additional seating options.
Concept #2 - Pavilion, Liahtinci, and More - The second concept does not include a splash pad. Instead, it proposes
additional perennial landscaping, expanded seating, an enlarged patio with a custom modular pavilion, festoon lighting,
and a significant shrub border between the park and adjacent residential homes. The pavilion's architecture would bc
reminiscent of onion sheds that occupied several corners in downtown Mount Prospect in the early twentieth (20th) century
and serve as a unique feature and amenity. Festoon lighting would crisscross throughout the park, making the park morc
versatile and programmable at night. A substantial plant border and rain garden would be provided, screening all park uses
from neighboring properties. The aforementioned walking paths, trees, benches, picnic table, logs, seat walls, and raised
lawn in the first concept are to be provided as well.
Park BudgeL
The Village allocated $750,000 for the design and construction of the park in the 2018 budget. Detailed budget estimates
of the two design concepts are attached.
Tonight and Next Steps
Altamanu will present the two park designs for discussion by the Village Board. Staff is looking for consensus from the
Village Board to move forward with construction drawings and the bidding process to complete the park in early
summer 2019. The Village Board is being asked to choose between a park design that includes a splash pad or one that
includes festoon lighting, a pavilion and more robust plantings.
A detailed timeline of the remaining steps for the park project is presented below for your review.
Table 2�: Next Ste��Ds of the Edwiii &nd IIElsie CMevIrk
"T7 No", 2 Descriotion
November Committee of the
27th, Whole Meeting Presentation of two concepts for final selection
2018
February (DrawingsI out to Bid Construction plans put out to bid
25thf
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 11/27/2018
BoardDocs® Pro Page 3 of 3
OWE
March Bids due to VOMP
18thf Staff and Altamanu Bids to complete work are due
2019
April Presentation of recommended construction bid t,
3rd, Village Board Meetingthe Village of Mount Prospect Board of Trustee
2019 by VOMP Staff
Spring & Park construction to be completed in time for th
Summer Park Construction Mount Prospect Downtown Block Party (weathe
of 2019 iDermittinq).
Village Board Material (002).pdf (6,542 KB)
Administrative Content
Executive Content
https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 11/27/2018
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT STATUS
Busse Pocket Park, Mount Prospect Illinois
November 16, 2018
IN AIIt rn In �IIinc
For Village Board review only kiridrx-p� a,chilach— LA-ri design, p plum ng
A lt am an u* nc .
',la 'linea I wbnn'dos[nrr,
November 16, 2018
Board of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Edwin and Elsie Meyn Busse Pocket Park — Design Development Status Narrative
It is with continued enthusiasm and pride that Altamanu, Inc brings a refined design concept for review
to the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois. Our team of landscape architects and
designers have conducted several public involvement events and online surveys to invite comment from
interested constituents which have been invaluable in our ongoing design process. The following
concept drawings and precedent imagery has been heavily informed by feedback from Mount Prospect
residents and stakeholders on preliminary design proposals as well as first-hand analysis by our
experienced team of professionals. Our presentation at the upcoming Committee of the Whole meeting
on November 27 will elaborate on our process and the enclosed materials. Our team is available to
answer any questions on this design work in preparation for our conversation at the Committee of the
Whole meeting.
The investment in Busse Pocket Park comes at a time of great change for Downtown Mount Prospect.
Multiple development projects within short walking distance of the project site will increase the density
of residents downtown while creating more foot traffic on Village sidewalks throughout the day. The
design concept for Busse Pocket Park reacts to this evolving context by facilitating dynamic
programming and activities to make an attractive public destination at all times of year. Multiple
seating option from benches to seatwalls allow for groups of various sizes to converse and recreate in
the park. Civic events held at the intersection of Busse Avenue and Emerson Street require the park to
occasionally receive crowds of people on a generous new lawn that allows seating facing toward Village
Hall as well as toward a new patio within the park to the East. Paved walkways at the corners of the
space employs the park as a popular shortcut between the residental neighborhood and the Village Hall.
Durable cafe tables and benches create a quiet space to work on digital devices during the day and host
small gatherings on the weekends.
Working within the constraints of the project budget, the design team was challenged to meet the most
popular requests by survey responders. While may people are in strong favor of an interactive water
feature on the site, the cost of installing such an amenity will prevent the inclusion of other popular
features. The attached concept plans illustrate, for your feedback, with and without a water feature.
Amenities such as site lighting and an iconic custom pavilion are much easier to achieve with the project
budget if the water feature can be avoided.
Our team is thankful for this opportunity to contribute to the Village of Mount Prospect and we look
forward to our upcoming conversation.
(B In d Si' ; ( B I ) u I"' (J I' L .: in d u r l qn I A(In I" l I In ((
1700 0 w. rvlr)g Ioairvkrd, + sJle 202 ; chsago, 'il r) is 60613 + 773 2&7492 I ; info@altamanu.com
DESIGN CONCEPT - WITH WATER FEATURE
Busse Pocket Park, Mount Prospect Illinois
II' II
CONCRETE PATH CONCRETE SPLASH PAD
WITH SPECIAL BOULDERS
SEATVVALL --.- ,--- _
F
1 "Q
r
r
LAWN `t \ :/i
SHRUB BORDER
Ij
E TO REMAIN r ��, , ,/. ;. �O ---
(TYPICAL) +
� f
/ td
WOOD BENCH
� Ig
BUSY! AVI: NUII:
0 0 40' I
PLANTING
Busse Pocket Park, Mount Prospect Illinois
PERENNIAL BEDS AND RAINGARDEN
SHRUB MASS AND BORDER
TREES
41I areIanu Inc
PAVING AND SEATING
Busse Pocket Park, Mount Prospect Illinois
CHARGING STATION
PAVERS
PICNIC TABLE
BENCHES
CAFE SEATING
41I areIanu Inc
SPECIALTY SEATING
PRECAST SEATWALL AT LAWN
SPECIAL FEATURES
Busse Pocket Park, Mount Prospect Illinois
POLE -MOUNTED LIGHT
41I areIanu Inc
FESTOON ROPE LIGHTING
INTERACTIVE WATER FEATURE
Pavilion Concept
Busse Pocket Park, Mount Prospect Illinois
Photos of Onion Sheds I n Mount Prospect
41j
IV
i
A I I a m a n Alnc..
,, — Pr -gra
-urgatcd 5 Pcrt�rr,ted Metal StfuCtural+claddiix] Pr ... dcntc
Precedents
Typical Sh,d Extcriur
//// /y
A I I a m a n Alnc..
,, — Pr -gra
-urgatcd 5 Pcrt�rr,ted Metal StfuCtural+claddiix] Pr ... dcntc
Precedents
Busse Pocket Park
CONCEPT WITH WATER FEATURE
#18019
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Updated November 15, 2018
Prepared by Altamanu, Inc.
II41R. 1111I II0,4."I1 tl;7HN II %Ilp',P0!:;:R::;
iII)NN.."11"
ITEM
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT COST ($)
ITEM COST
Paving
Concrete, cast in place
sq ft
1200
$9
$10,800
Pavers, precast concrete, Premium
sq ft
150
$26
$3,900
Pavers, precast concrete, Hollandstone
sq ft
1790
$13
$23,270
Decomposed Granite with ADA Stabilizer
sq ft
150
$10
$1,500
Gravel under Decomposed Granite (5")
cu yd
10
$65
$650
Play surface, poured
sq ft
0
$20
$0
Wood decking, Ipe
sq ft
0
$50
$0
Paving Contingency
20%
$8,024
Paving Estimated Total
$48,144
Planting
Sod
sq yd
1250
$12
$15,000
Perennial Bed
sq ft
265
$18
$4,770
Shrub Bed
sq ft
2200
$7
$15,400
Tree - Shade
3" cal.
4
$900
$3,600
Tree - Ornamental
8' ht.
12
$700
$8,400
Shrub - Large
5' ht.
10
$400
$4,000
Topsoil, add 6" to plantbeds
cu yd
260
$70
$18,200
Planting Contingency
20%
$13,874
Planting Estimated Total
$83,244
Furnishings
Trash Receptacle, Poe by Landscape Forms
each
5
$1,565
$7,825
Picnic Table, Harvest by Landscape Forms
each
1
$5,750
$5,750
Curved Bench by Maglin, Ipe, Surface Mount
lineal ft
50
$700
$35,000
Cafe Table
each
5
$780
$3,900
Cafe Chair
each
10
$310
$3,100
Charging Bollard by Landscape Forms
each
2
$1,800
$3,600
Nature Play - Log Prep
each
8
$100
$800
Pebble seating, precast concrete
each
5
$520
$2,600
Bench, Backed, by Landscape Forms
each
3
$2,500
$7,500
Custom Signage
lump sum
1
$2,500
$2,500
Furnishings Contingency
20%
$14,015
Furnishings Estimated Total
$86,590
Walls
Precast concrete seatwall
lineal ft
42
$500
$21,000
Curbing, 6" height
lineal ft
0
$30
$0
Boulder, large (+/- 4' ht)
each
1
$1,000
$1,000
Boulder, small (+/- 18" ht)
each
6
$600
$3,600
Outcropping Stone
lump sum
1
$1,750
$1,750
Walls Contingency
20%
$5,120
Walls Estimated Total
$32,470
Construction / Engineering
Water Service
lump sum
1
$30,000
$30,000
Site grading
lump sum
1
$40,000
$40,000
Sanitary Service
lump sum
1
$40,000
$40,000
Spray Irrigation and Controls (for 14000 sq ft)
lump sum
1
$20,000
$20,000
Drainage Utilities
lump sum
1
$25,000
$25,000
Engineering Contingency
20%
$31,000
Engineering Estimated Total
$186,000
Interactive Water Feature
Water Feature Mechanisms, Recirculating
lump sum
1
$170,415
$170,415
Water Feature Installation, with Tanks
percent
40%
$68,166
Water Feature Estimated Total
$238,581
Water Feature Concept Estimated Total $675,029
,Alli uiguo hc I rill idvvlli 1:1iv'VingV.
Busse Pocket Park
#18019
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Updated November 15, 2018
Prepared by Altamanu, Inc.
ITEM UNIT
Paving
UNIT COST ($)
Concrete, cast in place
sq ft
Pavers, precast concrete, Premium
sq ft
Pavers, precast concrete, Hollandstone
sq ft
Decomposed Granite with ADA Stabilizer
sq ft
Gravel under Decomposed Granite (6")
cu yd
Play surface, poured
sq ft
Wood decking, Ipe
sq ft
Paving Contingency
Paving Estimated Total
Planting
UNIT COST ($)
Sod
sq yd
Perennial Bed
sq ft
Shrub Bed
sq ft
Tree - Shade
3" cal.
Tree - Ornamental
8' ht.
Shrub - Large
5' ht.
Topsoil, add 6" to plantbeds
cu yd
Planting Contingency
Planting Estimated Total
Furnishings
UNIT COST ($)
Trash Receptacle, Poe by Landscape Forms
each
Picnic Table, Harvest by Landscape Forms
each
Curved Bench by Maglin, Ipe, Surface Mount
lineal ft
Cafe Table
each
Cafe Chair
each
Charging Bollard by Landscape Forms
each
Nature Play - Log Prep
each
Pebble seating, precast concrete
each
Bench, Backed, by Landscape Forms
each
Custom Signage
lump sum
Furnishings Contingency
Furnishings Estimated Total
CONCEPT WITHOUT WATER FEATURE
Niel D Y FOR CONS i FIN PC Y" Y+)N
QUANTITY
UNIT COST ($)
ITEM COST
lineal ft 42
Curbing, 6" height
lineal ft 40
1178
$9
$10,602
150
$26
$3,900
1775
$13
$23,075
150
$10
$1,500
10
$65
$650
0
$20
$0
0
$50
$0
986
1285
2450
4
12
10
260
5
1
55
6
12
2
8
5
3
1
Walls
$30,000
Precast concrete seatwall
lineal ft 42
Curbing, 6" height
lineal ft 40
Boulder, large (+/- 4' ht)
each 1
Boulder, small (+/- 18" ht)
each 6
Outcropping Stone
lump sum 1
Walls Contingency
Walls Estimated Total
Construction/ Engineering
$30,000
Water Service
lump sum 1
Site grading
lump sum 1
Sanitary Service
lump sum 1
Spray Irrigation and Controls (for 14000 sq ft)
lump sum 1
Drainage Utilities
lump sum 1
Engineering Contingency
Engineering Estimated Total
Onion Shed Pavilion
Pavilion, Uplift by Landscape Forms, with Roof lump sum 1
Pavilion customization upcharge lump sum 1
Pavilion Contingency
Onion Shed Pavilion Estimated Total
20% $7,945
$47,672
$12
$18
$7
$900
$700
$400
$70
20%
$1,565
$5,750
$700
$780
$310
$1,800
$100
$520
$2,500
$2,500
20%
$500
$30
$1,000
$600
$1,750
20%
$11,832
$23,130
$17,150
$3,600
$8,400
$4,000
$18,200
$17,262
$103,574
$7,825
$5,750
$38,500
$4,680
$3,720
$3,600
$800
$2,600
$7,500
$2,500
$14,995
$92,470
$21,000
$1,200
$1,000
$3,600
$1,750
$5,360
$33,910
$30,000
$30,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$20,000
$20,000
$25,000
$25,000
20%
$31,000
Site Lighting Contingency
$186,000
$58,000
$58,000
$45,000
$45,000
15% $15,450
$118,450
Site Lighting
Electrical Connection lump sum
1 $24,000
$24,000
Pole Mounted Light Fixture each
5 $8,000
$40,000
Festoon Rope Lighting and Poles lump sum
1 $20,000
$20,000
Site Lighting Contingency
15%
$9,000
Site Lighting Estimated Total
$93,000
Concept without Water Feature Estimated Total
$675,077
All torn'rnt I.. b,a r, 't" tl ,orifh d_I lk i uun,Arudiun