Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4.1 2018 Policy/Fire HQ Relocation Discussion
BoardDocs® Pro Agenda Item Details Meeting Apr 10, 201 - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLEA Subject1 • Type Discussion Public Content Page 1 of 3 NorthwestIn the 2017-2018 Strategic Planning process, the Board unanimously voted to prioritize the public safety building located at 112 E. •hway as its Top Priorityg- •r Action. The Board had previously authorized• • of - Needs Analysis to better understand the limitations of the existing Public Safety Building as well as identify future space needs for both Police and Fire. The presentation of ,,, - Needs Analysis-- and severalPolice members• • at the November1 • - of • _ meeting. The direction fromthe Board was to begin Policedeveloping alternative solutions for a future public safety facility that could accommodate the needs of a modern Police Headquarters. Since that time, staff has been working to develop both new construction and adaptive re -use options for both The concern for our Police facility is not a new subject. The attached memo dated March 22, 2005 from former Chief Richard Eddington expresses grave safety and operational concerns regarding the current Police Facility. A subsequent Space Needs Analysis was completed in 2007, but • action came from Police d Over e months,. '! options forPolice HQ.a options include Gregory00 E. Evergreen t 799 Biermann Court.• • ! would entail purchase of • from • Prospect Park District and new construction. Concerns about this option include cost of new construction, potential impact on the residential neighborhood to the west, and the loss of park/green space in the Village. A second option at 200 E. Evergreen Ave, directly east of the existing Public Safety Building, was also analyzed by staff and FGM. This concept constructs a two-story 48,000 SF Police building with undergroundparking and a bridge across Maple Street to connect to the existing Police building. single-storyThe site plan and budget is attached along with narratives from staff and FGM. This option is cost prohibitive - the total cost estimate ranged from $42,878,658 to $46,879,113 excluding land acquisition. This concept does not accomplish the operational and safety improvements identified in the Space Needs Analysis. Additionally, the property owner has indicated to our broker they are not interested in selling the property. A third option at 799 Biermann Court would be an adaptive reuse of an existing 1 • SF building, - p• to 87,000 SF, with site improvements including• - -• - off Kensington Road. adaptiveThe most favorable option from Staff"s perspective is a renovation of the property located at 799 Biermann Court. The proposed • 87,000 SF Police HQ accommodates the key objectives suggested- Space Needs Analysis to allow for enhanced Police effectiveness and safety. When comparing the adaptive re -use option to a new construction option at Gregory Park, the hard cost construction savings is estimated at $10.OM. The savings are greater when comparing the option of 200 E. Evergreen Ave. The projected • budget f• Biermann Court!' ! ! land acquisition. lowersignificantly . to $37.4M new construction estimate in the Space Needs Analysis for. standalone•' It should be noted that the estimate included in the Space Needs Analysis study does not include land acquisition. Fire Department Staff has also been reviewing options for a future Fire HQ. A study was completed by the Illinois Fire Chief"s Association to determine favorable locations for Station 13. There are certain parameters to the study which help determine favorable locations for Station 13: the Fire Department"s four minute response time goal, the existing location of Station 14 which would not change, https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 6/22/2018 BoardDocs® Pro Page 2 of 3 and historical data on actual calls throughout the Village were included in the Illinois Fire Chiefs Association"s analysis. The study indicates that relocating Station 13 to 111 E. Rand Road (MB Financial) will result in a significant improvement in EMS and Fire response times throughout District 13 as well as Station 14. MB zFinancial representatives have been working with staff on potential property acquisition; the bank has agreed • allow the Villageopportunity t• study the acquisitionbefore Analysisthe property on the open market. Village real estate broker Mark Baumhart, from Arthur 3. Rodgers, is working to develop a value for the property based on raw land and building assessments. The conceptual budget estimates suggest a value of $1.80M for property acquisition. The total budget estimate to relocate Fire administrative headquarters and Station 13 to 111 E. Rand Road is $10,378,000. This is a savings of $3.70M when compared to a new construction alternative, as noted in the Space Needs Benefits • Relocation Utilizing the opportunities availa• ' at 799 Biermann Courtand 111 E. Rand Road, the relocation• of both Police and Fire Headquarters and Station 13 is estimated at $40,378,000. This estimate is well under the projections provided by FGM for new construction. Given the excellent condition of both buildings, the estimated construction cost savings using the adaptive reuse approach for both 799 Biermann Court and 111 E. Rand Road is $13.70M. That savings allows the Village to finance the project without an increase to the property tax levy. The financial plan, which includes the issuance of bonds and a use of reserves, was presented in detail to the Village Board on April 3 for a first reading, with a second reading scheduled for April 17. . Both properties are exceptionally located to enhance both Police and Fire operations and emergency response. For Police, the • • Biermann Courtproperty w• ! include access off Kensington• !; a traffic study has been • by Engineering. The results of this study show no substantial traffic impacts on Kensington Road, the Kensington Business Center, or adjacent residential neighborhoods. Furthermore, auxiliary lanes (turn lanes or deceleration lanes) are not warranted. The level of service for each driveway/street intersection associated with the project is expected to be very good with little delay, even during peak periods. For the Fire Department, 111 E. Rand Road's dual frontages on both Rand and 83/Main Street are vital to the achieving the four minute targeted response time throughout the district. The Illinois Fire Chief Association report clearly states that relocating Station 13 "reveals a definite improvements to the overall travel times"' and the 111 E. Rand Road location would prove to be the best overall location for Station 13". Additionally, relocating Police and Fire facilities from the downtown site at 112 E. Northwest Hwy allows for the potential redevelopment of prime real estate. This property is located in the Prospect and Main TIF district but currently creates zero tax increment for the TIF. Given the property"s proximity to the train station and the existing conditions of the remainder of this block, •' for redevelopment.Using current market conditions, a conceptual plan shows just the PublicSafety Building space.site could support a development of a six story mixed-use development, netting a possible 130 residential units and 16,800 SF of retail a attached value projection fr• Friedman #•e projectcreate . total TIF increment generation of $11.6M over the life of the TIF. The net present value discounted at 4.0 percent is $6.7M. Staff has carefully analyzed the potential relocation of the Police Headquarters and Station 13/Fire Headquarters over the past several months. The importance of this issue is highlighted in the Strategic Plan for 2018, as this item is a Top Priority Target for Action. There are many layers to this discussion have recently come into alignment to help the Village achieve the goal of a functional, optimal Police and Fire Headquarters.availability of ! in ideal• •ns, the costs associated with land acquisition and construction (as well as the savings stemming from adaptive reuse), and sound financing of the projects have been •' • and supported through variousdocumentation,reports,! memos • e! to the Board and the public. Staff is requesting direction to move forward in the closing of •' •• Biermann Courtfor purposes of a Police Headquarters.• • • for • ' ! in the attachments, including but • ' • to location,of the building ,?nd its adaptive reuse potential, overall cost and the savings of utilizing the existing building, and providing the Police Department with a site and building layout that allows them to thrive in the era of modern policing. Staff is • requesting permission to begin negotiationsfor of Rand • • ! with MB Financial, for purposes of relocating Station 13 and the Fire Department headquarters. This site is in an ideal location which would result in improved • •• for both District 13 and 14, as supported by • •n"s Station Location Study. Timing is important for this item, as MB Financial as indicated a willingness to work with the Village before putting the property on the open market. Again, the building's condition provides cost savings due to adaptive reuse and construction I-stimates are lower than what is included in FGM"s Space Needs Analysis study. As with 799 Biermann Court or any other property acquisition,. contract to purchase wouldbe presented to the VillageBoard for• ! the Board authorize the nego • •• • I,IIi;,. SIG ii l,,hIii IG ID i . IIp iiir°Iii III 61 ,. 8 C 0 VV IIA e liren o ., p d 47 Ilil[:: https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 6/22/2018 BoardDocs® Pro 0 2 1,-Iiii -eIii us SIII i�(".e IISeedIIIIeteno fi-ote 0IIp d f (2,.1. 0'.1. IIS III11) 02 799 ,�, IIIIet�,no 6 V[:.3 I-:Xlf: , ,1 IIS III11) 02 2 S(:IIS w&i,""�..',z I i,-affk: Airii�III ys��s ...- 799 ( . . .. .. .. .. 7" K[13) 02 3 Iii �.:-e Assess ten e iiri , u, u, Ilillll Iii iii iir iii iii0., IIGc-I ; ,. ,, ; ,.4 7 K[:.3) 02 4 Ili- III 1--iQ Coiiri(:eII III; 'iii, -awIii rigs foii- 799 a IIG:Xff: (12.131-.11.9 IIS[:.1:3) 03 IIIIeteno 200 Coiiri(:eIIIpdf (706 IIS III,11) :: .1.1.1.1 v, e i -g i -e e �iri C&iri(:e�p�-�.:- 03 2 S e i� iiio �f 2 0 0 3 IIS Ilillll 0 4 III„ �)cf: iii -e ChI�efIII Iet�no i� iiri d Il �Zd 2 0 ".11. 8 cl f: 04.2 S.�.:.udy Mbwa-�.:- �5 1 12 8 �,IIS Ilillll �� ��i, 1.1.1.� 7 .)Cl'f'-' (4-3 K[:.3) 04.3 Gi-eg&i-y 1��-Vhk:e -,e &�Nov, 20 1 ......... .. 0 5 .1 i� iin d iin i� iin ("o iin g i� iiri . K [3cl �f: T.) u d g e 0 5 2 3 20".11.8) I-:Xff: K[:.3) 0 6,., lii iii. Ilf,, III Ilf iir iii, Ili, iii lii III iii III, ;. Ilf IIS Ili,ll 06 2 Coiiri(:eII fiii - Iii e &irid III ::::: III oiii -IIIf (209 IIS III11) 06.3 1 IIS 1 [ iir .iii -e t"n e iiri 1�,-)iii -o - ...- 3 8 d f (6 �-�.:-��&iris ...-�i-eV�sed 4 ".,17 K[:.13) O"T.".11. SIpi�(',.e Needs S-�.:-udy ...- Nov, 20".,"Il.."""""7'1111III')Cl'f"- (5,368 K[:.3) Administrative Content Executive Content Page 3 of 3 https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 6/22/2018 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE HEADQUARTERS Village of Mount Prospect - Police Headquarters Top 10 Reasons Why New Police HQ is Needed 1. Inadequate Building Space • Current Space of Police Department is 34,416 square feet. • Space Needs Analysis report identified required space for the Police Department is 81,123 square feet. 2. Inadequate Parking • Existing parking contains 103 spaces that are shared with the Fire Department. The space needs study identified the Police Department requires 177 parking spaces. • Lack or parking for visitors, and victims: Required to use off-street parking or off-site parking lots to visit the Police Department. • Unsecured parking for staff: the public has access to Police Department employees' vehicles. 3. Condition of Building • The Interior of the existing building has leaks. Evidence, records and property are currently at risk for water damage. • The current design prevents effective communication and operations. • The secured parking garage does not have space for all department vehicles. • The underground police parking garage has maintenance issues, including leaking, which is damaging squad cars, and concrete ceiling damage. 4. Officer Safety • Booking room layout exposes officers to unsafe conditions; officers have their backs turned to arrestees at times during processing. • Arrestees loiter outside building, creating potential safety issues for officers walking to their personal vehicles at the end of their shift. 5. Lack of Training Room • The training room is shared with the Fire Department, which creates scheduling conflicts. • The Police Department is mandated to conduct annual training. There is not sufficient room to conduct scenario based training. • Due to a lack of devoted space, mats and training equipment must be moved and setup for every training session. • The Police Department firearms range, which is not located at the current police headquarters, can only be used during business hours. This is because the range is located in a shared building (Fire Station 12) and use of the range impacts firefighters at the station. This limited time frame does not allow for training during evenings. 6. Inadequate work space • Officers are not given adequate, suitable workspace to complete reports. The area does not allow for more than 4 officers to complete reports simultaneously. • The workspace is open and conversations can be heard by everyone, severely limiting privacy during sensitive conversations. 7. Inadequate meeting/common space • Lack of meeting rooms to complete Police Department meetings. • There is not sufficient space to house outside agencies during critical incidents or major crimes. Regional task forces or the Cook County State's Attorney's Office are required to use hallways and existing desks to conduct operations. • Lack of room for offenders and victims to be properly separated. • Interview room locations prevent privacy and conversations can be heard outside of the rooms. • Lack of a community area for BEAT officers to conduct community engagement meetings. B. Sally Port • The sally port is filled with equipment, some of which can be hazardous. This prevents safe removal of prisoners from squad cars. • Two vehicles do not fit well in the sally port at the some time, which prevents multiple arrestees being removed from squad cars simultaneously. 9. Evidence Processing • The current area does not accommodate current and future technology. • There is a lack of room to store necessary evidence equipment. • There is a lack of area to process biological or DNA evidence. • There is a lack of space to store evidence. Legislation of evidence storage is evolving and departments are required to store evidence for increasingly longer times. • There is a lack of space to store vehicles involved in crimes. The lack of clearance prevents tow trucks transporting vehicles involved in crimes to the underground garage. 10. Technology Issues • The current Department does not have space to accommodate current and future technology. The current computer server room is at maximum capacity. • The current interview rooms must contain audio and video equipment for recordings. The current design of the building creates significant challenges in wiring rooms with audio and video equipment. FGM ARCHITECTS MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE HEADQUARTERS New Standalone Police Station Low High Construction Budget $31,345,038 $33,456,859 Owner Purchased Items (F&E, ect.) $996,000 $1,158,000 Fees and Soft Costs $2,280,427 $2,462,696 Owner Contingency $324,643 $362,070 Total Project Budget $35,116,109 $37,439,624 New Standalone H.Q. Fire Station 13 Low High Construction Costs $10,464,005 $11,139,102 Owner Purchased Items (F&E, ect.) $314,000 $386,000 Fees and Soft Costs $954,800 $1,058,433 Owner Contingency $126,880 $144,443 Total Project Budget $11,859,685 $12,727,978 Combined Police Department and H.Q. Fire Station 13 Remodel and Addition at Current Location Low High Construction Costs Owner Purchased Items (F&E, ect.) $40,734,841 $43,280,769 Owner Purchased Items (F&E, ect.) $856,000 $1,048,000 Fees and Soft Costs $1,263,000 $1,485,000 Fees and Soft Costs $3,094,946 $3,411,061 Owner Contingency $2,700,059 $2,917,500 Owner Contingency $396,306 $440,250 Total Project Budget $45,094,206 $48,123,519 Remodel and Addition at Current Location FGM ARCHITECTS BUDGET SUMMARY Low High Construction Budget Owner Purchased Items (F&E, ect.) $38,532,617 $41,974,146 $856,000 $1,048,000 Fees and Soft Costs $3,094,946 $3,411,061 Owner Contingency $395,095 $445,906 Total Project Budget $42,878,658 $46,879,113 FGM ARCHITECTS BUDGET SUMMARY MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE HEADQUARTERS a U O C Current Station Conditions Future Station Possibilities An � � 1 rr0n A FGM ARCHITECTS CURRENT VS. FUTURE POTENTIAL MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE HEADQUARTERS KENSINGTON ROAD 0vw�W FGM ARCH � ECTS SITE AERIAL New Construction New Police HQ Cost Comparisons Adaptive Reuse- Biermann Construction Cost $32,000,000.00 $21,597,755.00 FFE/ By Owner Costs $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 Design Fees & Soft Costs $2,300,000.00 $1,750,000.00 Project Contingency $350,000.00 $900k included above Total Cost Without Land $35,650,000.00 $24,347,755.00 Land Costs $3,702,600.00 $5,120,431.00 Adaptive Reuse Savings $9,884,414.00 FGM ARCH � ECTS SITE AERIAL MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE HEADQUARTERS FGM ARCH 0 C C CC C C CONCEPTUAL DIAGRAM MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE HEADQUARTERS CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR DESIGN 1 CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR DESIGN 2 FGM G'`;, E C H 0 T E T J CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR MOUNT PROSPECT FIRE HEADQUARTERS FGM ARCHITECTS SITE AERIAL New Fire HQ Cost Comparisons New Construction Adaptive Reuse- 111 E. Rand Construction Cost $10,800,000.00 $7,277,000.00 FFE/ By Owner Costs $350,000.00 $350,000.00 Design Fees & Soft Costs $1,002,000.00 $750,000.00 Project Contingency $135,500.00 $201,000.00 Total Cost Without Land $12,287,500.00 $8,578,000.00 Land Acqusition $1,800,000 $1,800,000 Adaptive Reuse Savings $3,709,500.00 FGM ARCHITECTS SITE AERIAL MOUNT PROSPECT FIRE HEADQUARTERS FIRE NFIRS Group 100 1 ••r • - Incident Hotspots pEpt. rvj r- I I 14 t r ---I------•--- i t j I t, Station 1. \ 13 r, ~, I I I I Station j i 12 i NFIRS Group 100 Total: 289 1 Percentage of District Incidents i Still District 12: 46% Still District 13: 29% Still District 14: 25% Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FGM 141 R C M E T MOUNT PROSPECT FIRE HEAD FIRE NFIRS Group 300 • x pEpt. UARTERS Incident Hotspots I 'Station .�I i 12 a l Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FGM ARCM E T I i i NFIRS Group 300 Total: 15,826 Percentage of District Incidents i Still District 12: 38% Still District 13: 40% Still District 14: 22% v I W I— a 0 a W W Cl z a W V O CL I— U W CL O ix CL r Z O 0 0 0 0 CD Ln Ci= o rteA O 0 0 0 O o vm _i O O o 0 dj p o O 0 0 = 0 co 0' Nr N I— O O � 00 O W 0 0 m N o m o 1� cn C:) m Ln N Ln to v� Ln � o o v Q ^ m 0 0 E ID- co o o 0 o v Lr O Ln � N O U O cC Ln o ^ m � d `n a� ri ri ri Lri a '+ 0 � 0 zoo 0 0 0 0 0 i o CD 0 �oo(noL� � � Ln CD O U O oo O `n O O Ln m °O N eo 3 CD cu N .S:2 N O d O O c w N t O O ca U c oZS O O — 00 vii c O O Na d c Z 2 N N or p O LLo v H O � O > N O l.0 CCD OW N O C o to U LCL O a v Q 0 0 E o co �o 0 0 m o o cn m Ln Ln o o v ^ m 0 0 o o o v Lr O Ln � c'v O cC Ln o ^ m � `n a� ri ri ri Lri a '+ 0 � 0 0 Q) d cu .S:2 O d N O O OO O O O 00 00 O 00 Z 2 p H O O O O O l.0 CCD o 0 Ln � o v Ln ,UT VT i./T -m z N N b0 0 co S_ - Ln Ln °) co � c O ,v N \ dcu-a fl- U LL a Q ad `W r ad P PP—. —J W N v N C C (n Q r L a OJ Q y O O Z3' M m min m m u7 m i0 i(1 m p y Y NR n a �r a O n �vya ovate LU N w Y C LL 'O C y �1 U m V R o Oam m �0-Oo` u m > �0z a` C7 O T c o Ti LL N C N O1 06 m V W 0) CL N 0 19 `L r z 0 m 0 a N cl aai O M�M f G ❑ N ❑ fR r M o r N N N N 0ry N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 T M m m 0 0 10 ID N m V Va N m m O m N a ma O m a Oa a Oa a ma 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 J« O r• r r r V X m to m I M i[1 M M m, m N ) 0 A O U N� o A o m O m mry O m N h V O m m o V m V m m� N V V �❑ N M O tm0 m N .r.. N� v N pO V .r.. .N...r.. � ry �j ... U c � a N � E U G n J A A N 1p S b r M M V N b t0 O m N W O W O V W N a0 m O M N o o O O o 0 o N o� o M c o V o V o 0 M M V� V M Nf M M M M PJ P'l {') Nl M PJ M M M M M l9 M M M i0 0 N j O w ' O A p Op p Op O p Op p Op O O p Op p Op O O O O O O O O O O O O A ll O ll N_ m SV m S O W CA N. N N N N N N N 1q b N H O . . . . N P'! M lh P'! M CY M iNi T 0 D C N S LL fA EA a A S S S EER-- i i i. i i. i........ o N w v o o m s s `NS U w rn ' A ........................ r d' S S S S S O S O O O S S tp0 y Om IO0 -O C N N Roo N `y r M M M M M M M CmJ M M O I� M O t0 N ro V M O O' O V VN C M m m m m m m V7 m m ow 0 o SS o 0 0 0 o S S S O. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O .0 O O O o O o o 4 O O c oM mM m o v m M r N r N m r r m m . m m rn o 0 0 -- NN M M - f» w ooS o m��n M V w7 N o ro n N ' p op 0 p Op 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V V V V V V a 1OO 000 S N N S� pV OOD tp0 apo N tp0 M d Ifi 101 N Y'i Y'i IA LL5 lli lCI lA IA h n tD N b W h a m O m V) QI u"i O m m m m m m m m m m m m r A m f0 m V V M M N m � � m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 81 S Sgo a O a S O O a O O O O C N M a I c0 r O a0 m Om1 0 F» e. p d C N ' o N m V N N N N N N N" N U m Uo N N r N f0 O N N m N sY .. O O S O S O � .V_. v N N N N N N ya��N . � ❑ Z ❑ rn F» . . . . C� C Za� m N N Orn ❑ z O A Y m� N C C (n M N N m INO N N V w O m ❑ Nso to ._. of Na M m min m m u7 m i0 i(1 m p w �vya M N 0mO � N M G 0 9 A V A$ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LUI- a 0 a W M LU LL 0 z a W U O CL I- V W CL V) O W CL H Z _ F- F-- -_-- j —FFFFT—FFFFR j L L, 'F- -- --- - u W U 0 LL MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE HEADQUARTERS Mount Prospect Police/ Fire Station HQ Site TIF Projections Incremental Property Tax Projections 01 2017 $0 SO SO 1 2018_ s0 Soi SO z 2019 $0 $Oj $0 31 2020_ $0 $0So 4 2021 $0 $0 $0 51 2422 $166,000 $66.0001 $100,000 6, 2023 $664,000 $143,0001 $521,000 7 2024 $830,000 $146,000_ $684,000 8 2026 $830,DD0_ $148,000 $681,000 9 2026 $880,000 $151,000 $729,000 10 2027_ 5880,000 $154,000 $726,000_ 11 242.@ $880,000 $158,000 $723,000 12 2029 $934,000 $161,000 $774,000 13 2030 5934,000 $164.000 $770,000 14 2031 5934,000 $167,000 $767,000 15 2032_ $9921000 $171,000 $821,000 16 2033_ 5992,000 $174,0001_ $818,000 17 2Q34 $992,000 $177,000? _ $814,000 18 2035_ 51,052,000 $181,0001 5871,000 19. 2036 $1,052,000 $185,000' $868,000 20 S1,05zoo0 $188,0001 $864,000 21 _2QL7 2038 57,117,000 1192,0001 $925,000 22 2039 $1,117,000 $196,000 $921,000 23. 20440 51,117,000 $200.000 _$917,000 24 2041 $1,185,000 $204,000 $981,000 Total 2022 - 2041 (Undiscounted) $15,273,000 2018 Present Value Discounted at 4% $8,467,000 Notes: 11] The Mount Prospect Downtown TIF was established in 2017 and is scheduled to expire in 2040 with a final collection year in 2041 [2]Corresponding calendar year with reassessment years underlined 131 Tax revenues are assumed to be collected one year after the tax year and equal to the incremental EAV multiplied by the property tax rate 141 Total estimated new student spending not to exceed 40% of Gross TIF Revenue for any particular year 151 Costs associated with the administration of the TIF district are not considered Sources; SS Friedman; Village of Mount Prospect; Cook County Assessor Assumptions 2016 Property Tax Rate (tax code 16091) 9.477% Annual Inflation Rate 2.0% Triennial Inflation Rate 6.12% Last Reassessment Year 2016 2016 Equalization Factor 2.8032 Discount Rate 4% Redevelopment Start 2021 Redevelopment Complete 2023 Redevelopment Period (Years) 2 First Year of Full Assessment 2023 Program Multifamily Unit Count 130 Retail SF 16,800 FGM ARCH EJECTS Comparable Property Research EAV per Unit - Multifamily $37,500 EAV per SF - Retail $80 Projected EAV - New Development (2016 dollars) Multifamily EAV $4,880,000 Retail EAV $1,340,000 Triennial Inflation Rate 6.12% Total EAV 2022 (Multifamily and Retail) EAV $7,000,000 W H Q D H V WQ a. W (/) _ Ow a V a - J �- p za D o3 x W W z On W W tnO Qa J0 J � > a. C7 z p W x V caD w Q D z i O a D w H H w H z J a 0 z_ U z Q z LL .Q zo wa �a QLL O On m w wz �w Q� J w J a >a V Q 00 w LL z w D w i J Oz =o �w w 2 V H LL p O(n w J H D ~ w i� �a O LL u z Q J a tD z V z Q z LL LL O z w 0 z O w w V O a \ c� a O H V a O a z D O Q J m Q J Q z O Q O LL z a O x 0 M r Q Q Q w V O a \ c� a O H V a O a z D O Q J m Q J Q z O Q O LL z a O x � 1 Z a W m U r O CL H s W CL 0 CL H � R z 0 i • AM O O V O p p t rn o o 0 O ■ � S 11 JCO 49 O _ O V V CJ �v �v � 1 Z a W m U r O CL H s W CL 0 CL H � R z 0 i • AM 0 a u 0 �3 U D w o_ � N u u U .0D Q 'c r O v r 0 D c �l u o o cn m LO 00 CNCN O O V O p p t rn o o 0 O 0 cd C, 11 JCO O _ O V V CJ �v �v tsi 0 a u 0 �3 U D w o_ � N u u U .0D Q 'c r O v r 0 D c �l u o o cn m LO 00 CNCN O u� C, o Q rn 3 CjO O 0 S C, 11 JCO O J 0 a u 0 �3 U D w o_ � N u u U .0D Q 'c r O v r 0 D c �l u o o cn m LO 00 CNCN MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE HEADQUARTERS BEFORE FGM ARCHITECTS AFTER BENSENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT ORLAND PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT WAREHOUSE ADAPTIVE REUSE EXAMPLES e zi r�4a as �„ w r `Y MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT FORMAL MEMORANDUM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SPACE NEEDS STUDY MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT CHF 05-35 CONTROL NUMBER It is clear that there are significant space shortcomings in the current police facility. As you read the following report, three key themes merit particular attention. The safety hazards posed when hallways and high traffic areas are routinely used for storage and closets are used for workstations. Legislation passed since the police station was occupied has placed increased operating and storage demands on the facility. For example; domestic violence legislation has caused a dramatic rise in the number of arrests and subsequent processing of domestic violence offenders. Recent -videotape legislation will require additional interview rooms to be built and equipped with videotaping equipment. Further, recent legislation requiring the collection of pertinent data by every police officer on each traffic stop he or she initiates, has resulted in additional document storage demands within the police facility. Our ability to service members of the general public and the operational needs of our own employees in a professional and comfortable environment is greatly hampered by the building's current space limitations. The recommended solution is to relocate the fire department headquarters. The status of the department's current space needs and forecast for future space needs, as well as, the proposed solution are set forth in substantial detail in the attached staff study. I look forward to a more extensive discussion and analysis of the issues raised herein with you in the near future. Page 1 of 1 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT FORMAL MEMORANDUM I CHF 05-35 TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: RICHARD EDDINGTON, POLICE CHIEF SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT SPACE NEEDS EVALUATION DATE: MARCH 22, 2005 ulak.uaalver ` CONTROL NUMBER Since the construction of the Public Safety Building in 1993, the police department has seen a growth in both personnel, calls for service and more significantly, an increase in the reliance on sophisticated technology to meet the needs of modern law enforcement. When constructed in 1993, the space allotted to the department in the Public Safety Building marginally met the needs of the department. At the time, little consideration was given to the notion of future space needs and the possibility of expanding to meet the needs of a growing department. Since 1993, the department has increased its sworn officer staff by nine officers or 12.3%. During this period, calls for police service have increased by approximately 8,000 or 22% annually. Additionally, the department has begun to rely heavily on technology such as networked computer workstations, electronic arrest booking systems, digital surveillance systems, mobile video recorders, and in car computer workstations. The sum of these changes since 1993 have created a significant need on the part of the police department for additional space to adequately perform our duties, and properly house equipment and evidence. The following report documents the current shortcomings of the facility in terms of specific units and sections within the department and what actions can be taken to remedy these shortcomings. Patrol Supervisors Work Area The room is configured to allow each of the eight patrol sergeants their own desk and small file cabinet. Each sergeant is required to maintain a laptop computer, pertinent reference and shift material, and documents used on a daily basis. The space of this work area only provides for an additional worktable and a small bookshelf. With the number of desks in this small room, approximately 25' x 15', there is little space between workstations making the area cramped. Because space in the area is limited, laptop computers were purchased in lieu of less expensive PC workstations in an effort to save space. Although a much smaller footprint, the laptops still take up a considerable amount of space on the desk, making it difficult for sergeants to complete tasks where paperwork and laptop must be used simultaneously. Additionally, sergeants are not able to have their assigned file cabinet within the work Page 1 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT CHF 05-35 FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUMBER area. Each sergeant's file cabinet is stored in a nearby storage room along with various patrol equipment. This makes it difficult for sergeants to gather materials stored in file cabinets used in daily tasks. As a result of the size of work area, sergeants do not have space for their own bookshelves to store books and periodicals used daily. Also, during shift overlap periods, the limited space between desks makes it difficult for sergeants to move to and from their workstation without disrupting the sergeant seated directly behind him or her. Finally, because of its size, this area could not support any additional sergeants should one be added to patrol.. Adjacent to the sergeants' area are three small offices approximately 10' x 9' in size. These three offices are assigned to the patrol commanders. Because of their small size, each office can only hold a desk, single file cabinet and small credenza. The small size makes it difficult to comfortably meet with personnel during counseling sessions and extremely difficult when attempting to speak with more than one person in the office. The small office does not provide sufficient space for a computer workstation and necessary paperwork. Records Section The records section is staffed by one civilian supervisor, a warrant clerk, three clerks, and two part-time data entry clerks. The records section acts as the central clearing house and repository for all department case reports, arrest reports, court documents, department forms and reports, and citations. The activity of the records section has increased dramatically over the past several years. As mentioned, since 1993 there has been an increase of calls for service by 22% (8,000 calls) resulting in additional documentation and reports. Additionally, due to the requirements of state and federal laws, there has been an increase in the types of forms and documents gathered and retained. The records section has become inundated with documents and forms, which must be maintained in accordance with state record retention laws prior to being recorded in digital form for future retrieval. The result has been that all file cabinets are filled to capacity. This includes the Laktriever, which is an automatic case report filing system and the Kardex automatic filing system which maintains all active citations. Since there is no further space to place additional file cabinets or storage systems to hold these documents, forms and reports are placed in large cardboard boxes and stacked adjacent to work stations. Not only does this make retrieving reports difficult when having to rearrange boxes to find the correct one, the arrangement makes moving about the area by personnel cumbersome and infringes on workspace. All available space in the records section has been judicially used in order to gain the greatest amount of use from it. The hallway leading from the patrol area to the records section has been lined with floor to ceiling file cabinets. The closets which contain the department's electronic entry system, alarm system and electrical components had originally contained only a wall of shelves for supplies. This closet now contains several shelving units, a large microfilm reader and a large shredder. Because of the cramped space, personnel are unable to sit while using the microfilm reader and there is no tabletop room for use when shredding. Page 2 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT I CHF 05-35 FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUMBER Additionally, since 1993 the department has begun using technology to meet the changing needs of the department. in 2004, a dedicated Scantron scanning station was placed in the records section to digitally input the approximately 15,000 traffic stop data collection forms the department completes annually. This station resides at a standard desk workstation. In 2005, a second Scantron station is planned for the records section. Currently there is not sufficient space to place one. As part of the Village's move to storing archived documents in digital format, scanning stations have been purchased for Village departments. The police department has not installed the system in the records section due to the lack of sufficient space to adequately accommodate a workstation. Finally, workstations afford extremely limited space. Clerks generally only have their desk areas to complete their routine tasks. Each desk workstation includes a PC in +6. in�Kiuh, 4n Qr%mctimac maintain documentation in an organized fashion while being processed. As part of their daily activities, clerks are required to copy a significant amount of paperwork for dissemination within the department and other Village departments. The copier workstation is cramped and does not adequately afford enough room to efficiently perform this task. -- - - - - - - - - - --- --------------- Records ----------- -Records section operation is key to the department successfully fulfilling its information processing and storage responsibilities. However, of all the department's major components, its operation is most hindered by the lack of adequate storage and workspace. Interview Rooms The department's patrol section currently has three small rooms allotted to interviewing victims, witnesses and criminal suspects. Each room consists of a small table with two chairs. One of the three rooms is also used as a non -criminal fingerprinting station. All three rooms are stark in nature and do not provide a comfortable atmosphere for victims and witnesses (both adult and juvenile) to be interviewed by police personnel. Additionally, the location of these rooms makes it difficult for youth officers to easily keep juvenile suspects under constant observation while being detained. These rooms do not meet the department's needs. The rooms are cramped and at times do not adequately provide space when multiple persons are interviewed. The interview rooms need to be larger and provide a more comfortable setting for victims and witnesses. Patrol Report Writing The patrol report writing area is located in an open area adjacent to the patrol supervisors area. The report writing area contains four small workstations with each having a computer workstation. These workstations are used by patrol officers to complete reports and investigations, by community service officers to complete reports and abandoned vehicle documentation, and by specialty officers such as youth officers to complete follow-up investigations. This area also includes storage for all reports used by patrol, the mobile video media storage cabinet and storage for patrol operations. The patrol report writing area is part of an open walkway leading through the patrol section of the first floor to a common stairwell. This location and configuration make the area a Page 3 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT CHF 05-35 FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUMBER J central gathering point and as such makes it difficult for patrol personnel to complete reports in an atmosphere conducive to complex or detailed report writing. The workstations are limited in space making it difficult to complete reports and inventory evidence. Additionally, there are many times when all four workstations are in use and officers must wait for one to become free. The patrol report writing area does not afford officers with specialty assignments such as youth officers, breathalyzer operator officers, truck enforcement officers, or field training officers an area where they can maintain files and documents. These officers are required to maintain much of this material in their personal lockers making it difficult for them to have materials available when needed. This frequently results in unnecessary delays in completing investigations and reports. Lunchroom When the Public Safety Building was constructed in 1993, a dedicated lunchroom was located on the second floor adjacent to the telephone equipment room. With the need to install computer network equipment, most of the lunchroom was walled off for a secure computer network room. As a result, the room left for the lunchroom no longer had a sink, kitchen countertops, refrigerator, microwave or adequate room for personnel to use. The department's current lunchroom consists of a small corridor adjacent to the janitor's supply room, located in the basement between a secured stairwell and hallway leading between the locker -room and roll call room. This space contains two very small tables, two vending machines, refrigerator and countertop. Because of its open layout, personnel are not inclined to use the area to eat their meals. As a result, civilian personnel many times eat at their desks or, if available, use the patrol conference room. The lack of a dedicated lunchroom makes it difficult for personnel to comfortably have their meal without leaving the building or by using a space not intended for them to use for this purpose. Technical Service Unit Since 1993, the department has experienced a monumental increase in its reliance on technology to meet the needs of modern law enforcement. Most notably during this time, the department has become increasingly reliant on the use of networked computers, in -car computer data terminals, mobile video recording units, communication equipment, digital photographic equipment and sophisticated computer software. The technical service unit consists of one sergeant and one officer. Their office is located in an open area of the police administration section, which was originally used as the department library and conference room. Also sharing the space are the department's two community oriented policing officers who have an assigned workstation in the room. The most noticeable impression of this work area when first viewed, is the amount of equipment maintained in this small area to service the technical needs of the department. The area does not provide the necessary basic or secured storage essential to the operation of this unit. Because of the considerable volume of equipment, replacement parts and tools needed by the unit are at times disorganized, resulting in a marked decrease in efficiency. In addition to the lack of ;general storage space for equipment, the area does not provide secured storage Page 4 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT CHF 05-35 — FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUMBER space for controlled equipment. The room does not provide an adequate space to conduct equipment repairs that have become commonplace in lieu of sending equipment out for costly repairs. The work area lacks sufficient file cabinets to adequately house the vast amount of documentation, records and written information, which must be maintained. The area also lacks sufficient workspace for scan stations, printers and computer workstations used by personnel. Additionally, much of the larger items stored by the unit are maintained throughout the three floors of the building wherever space is available. This includes spare computer monitors, mobile data terminals, squad emergency equipment, radar equipment, radios and typewriters. As a result, the efficiency level of the unit is highly diminished. The technical service unit is also responsible for daily review and reproduction of . .. . . 1. —1 • _ __:a:_s .--..--- -al.. ..a,.�C.,.a L... 4F,.. +--k-;e+ 0 cnntir+c .. II I%JVII,•I�Avv ,vvv „w,,,.J.v. ....- r -Z.-.-._ .- _--- . _- _ I sergeant on a full time basis requiring the review and processing of 30 - 50 videotapes or digital files on a weekly basis. This large number of tapes requires significant storage of tapes being processed as well as tapes stored for future use. Due to the limited space, videotapes and other digital media are maintained at various locations within the building. This multi -location storage affects the efficiency of the program by requiring the technical service sergeant to constantly relocate media based on where the media is currently being utilized. Administration & Operations Storage The administration and operation sections of the department currently use two small file rooms to store personnel files, training records, BOFPC records, recruitment files, grant documentation, personnel forms, administrative memos, vendor materials, compliance & parking citations, copy machine paperwork, toner cartridges, community service officer and crossing guard equipment, film and general office supplies. These two rooms have far exceeded the capacity they can adequately and efficiently hold. Records and other materials are stacked within these rooms outside of cabinets making them difficult to locate and retrieve. Because of the lack of filing space, many of the department's records are maintained in cardboard boxes. These boxes are stacked throughout the administration section's file and storage rooms. The recent approval by the Village Board authorizing the position of operations commander has resulted in the need to provide adequate office space for the position. As the operations commander will work closely with the Deputy Chief of Operations, office space within the administrative section is a must. Currently the only space available is the administrative conference room. Although this conference room is utilized for staff meetings, training, meetings with vendors and a general lunch room, there is little choice but to use this room as the Operations Commander's office. Once the change takes place, staff will need to rely on the investigative section's conference room if available. Crime Prevention Unit The crime prevention unit (CPU) currently has adequate space for the two officers assigned to the unit. As with many other units, the crime prevention unit lacks Page 5 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT CHF 05-35 FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUMBER sufficient storage space to adequately maintain supplies and materials to efficiently carry out their function. The CPU currently uses a small closet to maintain the most necessary materials they use on a daily basis. This area has become cramped making it difficult to easily locate and retrieve items. Those items requiring additional space, or those that cannot be stored in this closet, have been moved elsewhere within and outside the Public Safety Building. Many items have been relocated to the holding facility's sallyport and basement stairwell allowing access by non -CPU personnel. Additionally, several of the larger items are stored at the CPU officers' residences and some have been stored at Morton Suggestions, a local business that has agreed to assist the unit with storage free of charge. The need to store items outside the facility has impacted the efficiency of the unit by requiring personnel to go offsite to locate equipment and materials needed for presentations or distribution. Investigations Section The investigations section is currently staffed by one commander, one sergeant, eight investigators, two tactical officers and two school resource officers. Besides having two separate offices for the investigations section commander and sergeant, the investigative section consists of cubicle workstations located in a common area. Originally designed to comfortably hold nine cubicles, the area was redesigned to accommodate space for tactical officers and school resource officers, a total of thirteen cubicles. This leaves the area cramped and does not allow the opportunity for future expansion. With its current space, the investigations section would not be able to accommodate additional investigators assigned to the unit. Additionally, the workspace cannot accommodate task force investigators should a MCAT call -out be required by this department to investigate a major crime. In addition to the need for personnel space, the investigations section is also deficient in the amount and type of space allotted for interview purposes. Currently the section has two basic interview rooms. These rooms do not allow for multiple interviews to take place at the same time, and also do not allow suspects to be adequately separated from each other, or from witnesses and victims. Additionally, these rooms are not conducive to interviewing witnesses and victims of serious crimes when interviews last a long period of time. Nor are these interview rooms conducive to interviewing both juvenile victims or witnesses, and juvenile offenders. Interviews of victims, witnesses and juveniles should be conducted in a comfortable atmosphere allowing the interviewee to be at ease. With the department's increasing reliance on digital evidentiary photography, the investigative section assembled a digital photography workstation. This workstation is currently located in a small closet within the investigations section. Because of its limited space, when an investigator or evidence technician uses the equipment, he or she must actually sit outside the closet within a walkway. Not only does this interfere with the normal flow of movement in the section, it allows for sensitive photographs to be viewed by personnel or those meeting with investigators. Page 6 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT FORMAL MEMORANDUM FCHF 05-35 CONTROL NUMBER In July 2005, the State of Illinois will require mandatory audio/video recording of all interrogations of homicide suspects. This will include reckless homicide suspects. This will require an interview room to be fully outfitted with recording devices which will be monitored in an adjoining storage closet by assisting investigators. The current interview room is too small to adequately and comfortably accommodate a suspect and investigators conducting an interrogation. It will be necessary to find a larger room to adequately meet our needs. Finally, the investigative section conference room does not allow all investigations personnel to comfortably meet for roll call or section meetings. Additionally, the size of the office does not adequately accommodate group meetings with personnel Trom Oinef �JUIIUe c9l�CIII;ICJ. 111 uaava 11-1vauuiuviiu1 J`/CAVV ..- •-- necessary to relocate these meetings to the fire/police conference mom. However, the fire/police conference room is seldom available due to its general use by the fire department. Training Unifi In recent years the department has increased the level of in-house training to adequately meet the needs of the department. The department, through the efforts of the training sergeant, has begun training in physical skills and tactics. This type of training not only requires adequate space but requires the department to maintain training equipment. Currently, our facility does not provide space for either. In many instances, the department has needed to use public facilities such as those provided by the park district or high school for adequate space and equipment. The department does not have the storage to maintain equipment such as safety gear or protective mats. The department needs a dedicated space to hold training on such topics as defensive tactics, weapons of mass destruction and personal safety equipment_ The department currently maintains one bookshelf to hold reference materials and one to hold video training tapes. Overflow items are scattered throughout the department making it difficult for personnel to locate and use. The department is in need of a centralized dedicated space to hold all reference text materials and video training materials so that personnel can easily locate and review. Properfiy Room & Evidence The current property room affords adequate space to store and maintain general property and evidence held by the department. The property room does not adequately hold narcotics and controlled substances that must be placed in separate secure locations with adequate ventilation. Additionally, the evidence facility does not have the capacity to adequately and safely process evidence contaminated with blood or other biohazards. A separate well -ventilated area is needed to dry and package these materials. Page 7 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT FORMAL MEMORANDUM PROPOSAL CHF 05-35 CONTROL NUMBER Through the acquisition and use of the fire department's administrative section, the police department can alleviate most of the space problems it now experiences by utilizing its current space and newly acquired space in the following manner. Patrol Supervisors Area The current patrol supervisors area may be expanded into the area occupied by the report writing area. By removing the west wall and placing a wall along the north side of the current report writing area, the space of the patrol supervisors area would increase by more then 50%. The increase in space would allow additional workstation space, allow file cabinets to be housed at the sergeants' workstation, room for additional shelving for equipment and materials, and result in less congestion during shift overlap. The additional space could also be used to accommodate additional supervisory personnel such as a traffic sergeant. With the additional space, it would then be possible to bump out the glass wall of each commander's office to increase the size allowing for adequate space to meet with shift personnel in a private atmosphere. Additionally, with the removal of the eight file cabinets from the storage room, patrol equipment can be adequately housed in that location. Records Section To meet its increasing need for space, the records section would be relocated to the current investigations section location. In its current configuration, the new records section location would afford a private office for the records supervisor, a secure location for the Laktriever and Kardex automatic filing systems, a location for the microfilm viewing station and adequate storage space for file cabinets to adequately hold all department documents. The department's forms, reports and citation formsets could be organized and maintained in the section's storage room instead of various locations within the department. The small interview rooms can be used to store the numerous boxed documents and reports awaiting scanning to digital format. Additionally, because of its open space configuration, the new location would allow adequate workstation space for each records clerk and room for two Scantron scanning workstations and a dedicated document scanning station. The Investigations conference room may be used as a dedicated lunchroom facility to service the civilian and sworn staff. The area currently used by the investigations section secretary would provide ample space for the records section customer service clerk. The investigations section file room could be converted to a dedicated copier room providing ample counter space to perform routine copying and a location for shredding. Interview Rooms The area vacated by the records section would afford ample room for three to four )interview rooms. These rooms would be constructed in the northern section of the space. The rooms would be larger than the current interview rooms and constructed to Page 8 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT CHF 05-35 FORMAL MEMORANDUM CONTROL NUMBER make them more hospitable and comfortable for victims, witnesses and juveniles to be interviewed_ The current records supervisor's office, which is larger in space, can be converted into a soft interview room so as to include a sofa and chairs. The rooms currently used as interview rooms could then be dedicated for use by patrol specialty positions or additional patrol storage. Patrol Report Writirt The large open area of the current records section would allow a minimum of eight workstations for patrol officers to complete reports. Additionally, two of these workstations can be used as dedicated workstations for field youth officers and breathalyzer officers. Finally, the new location would allow for an area where there is no pass-through traffic making it more conducive to officers completing their reporting dbblyIIII1011W. 1 ilc Icl,vI%A.7 J..vuv. ... ...v...y- - -•-- ____-__ ._ _ dedicated area for patrol equipment and reports. investigations Section The investigations section would relocate to the fire administration section currently accommodating fire prevention and fire inspector personnel. This area would provide ample space for investigator workstations, offices for the section commander and sergeant, storage space and a large conference room to accommodate investigator roll calls and meetings. Additionally, the large office located along the south side of the common area could be used for task force office space. The area currently used by the fire prevention secretary would provide sufficient space for the investigations section secretary. The concern of providing an interview room to audio/video record homicide suspects will be adequately addressed by using one of the small offices adjacent to the proposed investigations section. The room will provide a larger area which will comfortably accommodate a suspect and bNo investigators. Since the interrogation will be recorded in both audio and video, it is important to ensure that future presentation of video to jurors show the interrogation took place in a comfortable atmosphere so as to preclude the inference the suspect was coerced in providing a statement. A larger interview room will provide just that. Additionally, should the need arise for an additional interview room with audio/video recording equipment, the proposed area could easily accommodate the need. operations & Administrative Support Divisions The Deputy Chief of Operations and operations commander may relocate to the area vacated by the Fire Chief, Deputy Fire Chief and their staff. Additionally, the crime prevention unit would also relocate to the adjoining area. This would allow ample space for crime prevention storage, a dedicated copier area and sufficient room to provide secured storage space for personnel files, BOFPC files, administrative review files and most department training files. The relocation of these materials would empty most of the space in the administrative section file room. Page 9 of 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT FORMAL MEMORANDUM CHF 05-35 CONTROL NUMBER The conference room located in the current fire section would provide ample space to accommodate large meetings and small training sessions. The administration section conference room which had been used by the operations commander would revert to a general conference room where it would again be used as a small meeting/training room. Technical Services Unit The area vacated by the crime prevention unit would provide a secure location for the department's technical service unit. Sufficient space would be available for multiple computer workstations, equipment repair stations and storage cabinets. The adjacent closet would provide ample storage for computer equipment, mobile video recording equipment, mobile data terminal equipment, radio equipment, and related technology. Additional storage space would be provided by the additional space freed up in the administration's file room. Library & Trainiacg Materials The area vacated by the technical services unit would revert back to the department's library allowing for periodicals and text materials to be readily available to all personnel. Additionally, training media materials can be stored at this location. Computer workstations would be made available to allow computerized in-service training currently being conducted at patrol workstations. Personnel would have the opportunity to receive on-line training in a location with few distractions. Department training materials could be relocated and maintained in administrative section file rooms once freed up by the removal of operational files and materials. CONCLUSION By utilizing the space vacated by the fire department administrative section, the police department would have the space necessary to adequately perform the functions specific to each unit of the department. Further, the additional space would afford the department some ability to expand in the future as both the department and our reliance on new technology grows. Attached for review and consideration are photographs depicting several of the department's sections and units that do not have adequate space to efficiently and effectively perform departmental responsibilities. Attachment Richard Eddington T 11Pd\Users\MSemkiu\Main\My Documents\Ndmin Memos12005 Space Needs Evaluation.doc Page 10 of 10 Torlhn;-1 CPri/irP wnrIcOntinn Technical Service MVR review workstation. Technical Service work area. 1 riummistratnons storage room. Atimmistrations file room. Unme Prevention storage room. Patrol report writing area, view #1. L Patrol report writing area, view 42. Patrol Supervisors area, view '01. 3 Patrol Supervisors area, view #2. xecoras Section, view #1. xecoras Section, view #2. ir-- l P o. +T, nnrtinn nP Rarnni¢ Neeflnin View of north portion of Records Section. View of Lekriever filing system in Records Section. n View of Ri Mz-q%-- I 4 I Section storage closet with microfilm reader and shredder. I I I Microfilm reader and shredder, view #2. Con Records Section file room. Vn+ l rnmm"nMpr nttIra Investigative Section, toll view. Investigations Section workspace, view IF i . Investigations Section workspace, view #2. Investigations Section workspace, view #3. ulvesngations section workspace, view #4. T Digital photography workstation, view #1. Digital photography workstation, view 41. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE -WIDE FACILITIES STUDY Ia PRELIMINARY PROJECT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and Project Background To provide information to be used as part of long range planning, the Village of Mount Prospect hired Sente Rubel Bosman Lee Architects Ltd. (SRBL) to conduct a Space Needs Study for the Police Department, Fire Station 14, Fire. Administration, an Emergency Operations Center (EOC), and expanded maintenance bays and storage at Public Works. — A 4- 4. 4NAT- a ,.,,E AAA 3:kZN 4E The study was conducted to determine: 1. The space requirements of each department or particular operation in the case of Fire Station 14. 2. The possibility of expanding the existing Police Department within the envelope of the existing Public Safety building with the potential move of Fire Administration to an offsite location. 3. To determine a space needs and a location for the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). 4. To determine parking needs for the Public Safety building and immediate surroundings. 5. The estimated Cost of Construction and Total Project Budget For each option identified above. With this information the Village will be able to select from proposed alternatives, prioritize projects and plan budgets. Preliminary Conclusions for the Police Department/ Public Safety Building While the total study is not yet complete, the following irirurmation pertinent to item number two (2) above was determined: The existing Public Safety Building presently houses the complete Police Department, along with FirE Administration, Fire Prevention Bureau and Fire Station 13. The total gross square footage of the Public Safety building on all levels and Inclusive of the functions listed above is 65,700 square Feet. The Police Department currently occupies 47,176 square feet of that total. 5� The preliminary finding of the space needs study for the Police Department concludes that the Police � ,, Department actually requires 57,375 square feet, inclusive of indoor parking for 45 vehicles. This 10 finding is consistent with a Village and Police Department of Mount Prospect's size. Recently planned and completed Police Department projects for other municipalities are either similar in size or larger — sometimes significantly — even if the department in question is smaller than that of Mount Prospect's Department. Additionally, this space needs projection takes growth and expansion of the Department into consideration up to twenty (20) years into the future. Thus, the pre -conceived notion of moving Fire Administration and the Fire Prevention Bureau out of the Public Safety Building to allow for Police expansion barely makes a dent_ in the Police space needs. The total area of the Fire Administration (inclusive of the FP Bureau) is 4,755 square feet. This addition would bring the total Police square footage to 51,933, but the Police would still be over 15,000 square feet short of its space needs. SENTE RUBEL BOSMAN LEE ARCHITECTS LTD. PAGE 1 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JANUARY l2, 2007 VILLAGE {AZIDE FACILITIES STUDY SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Given this rather extreme predicament, we see two potential scenarios that could ameliorate the situation: Option One Build a new Fire Headquarters Station offsite, which would include Fire Administration, Fire Prevention Bureau AND Station 13 in its entirety. With the Fire Department completely moved out of the Public Safety Building, the Police Department could take over the total 66,700 square footage. With the potential enclosure of the existing Fire Department outdoor training deck on the west side of the building, the total square footage of the Police Department could be raised to just over 68,000 square feet. Pros: I. The Police Department could be housed for the foreseeable future within the footprint of the existing facility, which is only 14 years old. 2. The Fire Department would be wholly contained within a new building of its own, modern design 3. With the Fire Department out of the Public Safety Building, the parking dilemma would be greatly eased. Cons: 1. The renovation of the existing Fire spaces — in particular Station 13 — would be highly complex and costly. 2. Housing the functions of Station 13 and Fire Administration during construction. 3. It is quite likely that while the Public Safety Building has adequate gross square footage to fulfill the Police space needs, the configuration of the building may not be ideal for the design of a modern Police headquarters. 4. Building a Fire headquarters on a distinct site would be costly and would necessildle finding, purchasing and developing a site that must fall within a set geographic area of central Mount Prospect in order to suit the Fire Department's service area. 5. Fire and Police would no longer share a facility. Option Two Expand the existing Public Safety Building to the required square footage through the use of additions. On the north side of the Public Safety Building, retail properties along Emerson Street could be purchased and on the west side, an addition could be constructed over the top of the troublesome parking deck. In addition, property to the east side of Maple Street could be purchased and used for satellite functions, such as Fire Administration and/or a parking deck for the combined facility. Pros: 1. Retains use of the 14 -year-old Public Safety Building. 2. Could significantly ease parking congestion around the Public Safety Building. 3. Keeps Fire & Police together in the downtown area. 4. No need to find a new site elsewhere in the Village. 5. Would solve the issue of the deteriorating parking deck. 6. The retail properties along Emerson Street could be available, which would allow ground - level retail development in the Public Safety Building addition to serve train commuters. SENTE RUBEL BOSMAN LEE ARCHITECTS LTD. PAGE 2 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ]ANUARY 12, 2007 VILLAGE WIDE FACILITIES STUDY SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Cons: I. The shape and size of adjacent parcels may lead to a rambling, incoherent floor plan; awkward elevations; and a convoluted entry. 2. Possible satellite functions for either Department. 3. Inconvenience for both Departments during construction. 4. Extended construction time with short term parking shortages. 5. Property acquisition on both sides of the Public Safety Building. 6. Highly variable costs. Summary As developing large-scale design options on the Public Safety Building site were not part of our charge for this study, we have not developed opinions of probable cost for either scenario at this time. If the Village chooses to investigate either, both or any additional options following review of the Facts of the space needs study for the Police Department, SRBL will be happy to assist. Space needs studies for Fire Station 14, Fire Administration, EOC and Public Works maintenance and storage additions have preliminary findings in line with pre -study assumptions and appear to be able to fit on their proposed sites and/or within existing spaces/properties. The full findings of the study will be available in its entirety within the next month. This ends the Preliminary Executive Summary, The Executive Summary is provided to give the reader a broad overview of the issues unearthed during the space needs analysis for the Police Department. Please refer to the upcoming full report for the detailed analysis for each facility. SENTE RUBEL BOSMAN LEE ARCHITECTS LTD. PAGE 3 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JANUARY 12, 2007 VILLAGE WIDE FACILITIES STUDY SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS I',A KEY MAP 799 !Hermann Memo - March 6, 2016 Village Board Meeting In 2007 the Village began to take steps to evaluate the condition and suitability of the existing Station 13 Fire/Police Headquarters at 112 E. Northwest Hwy. In 2016, a neer study was initiated due to the deteriorating conditions of the existing Police Headquarters building. In addition to feedback from Police staff, the Village hired FGM Architects to complete a Space Needs Study. A final draft of this report was completed in November 2017 and shared with the Village Board. Some of the concerns highlighted in the study include: - Lack of Space. She study indicates that approximately 81,000 square feet would be required for a stand-alone police station, based upon changes in police operations, information technology needs, and accessibility. The current portion of the Public Safety Building devoted to the police department is 33,415 square feet on three levels - Lack of parking. The study recommends a minimum of 177 parking spaces for a stand-alone police station. The current station has 165 shared spaces for police, fire and customers; a significant portion of these parking spaces are located within an underground garage which has maintenance concerns directly impacting the use of the facility and damaging Village vehicles. In addition to the design flaws in the existing building, there are budgeted maintenance expenses which are significant. Many of these expenses have been deferred for the last several years as we studied the possibility of a new facility. Here are some examples: ■ 2019 Budget: Garage sprinkler replacement: $105,000 + 2019 Budget: Parking deck structural repairs: $523,000 ■ 2019 Budget: Window replacement: $230,000 • 2020 Budget: Repairgarage roof drains/remove planter: $255,000 ■ 2020 Budget: Buildinetuckpointiny: $100,000 TOTAL: $1,313,000 It is clear that there are improvements that must be completed to have a modern, functioning police headquarters. These concerns were highlighted at the November 28, 2017 Committee of the Whole meeting, which discussed the Space Needs Study as well as noting the conditions of the current police station headquarters. The Space Needs Study examined a potential remodel of the existing building, as well as the option of a new location somewhere in the Village for either a stand -along police station or a combined police/fire building. Due to the current conditions of the police headquarters, financial analysis and availability of suitable real estate, a stand-alone police station makes the most sense moving forward. In follow up to the Study, the Village evaluated several locations which met minimum criteria: Size of parcel (to ensure the building could be feasibly constructed on the site) and location {to ensure the site is accessibie to all areas of the Village within a reasonable amount of time]. Staff analyzed several locations on Central Road, Rand Road, Dempster Avenue and within the Kensington Business District. Support for 799 Biermann Court Staff is recommending acquisition of the industrial building located at 799 Biermann Court in the Kensington Business Center for a price of $5,120,431 inclusive of property tax proration. This property satisfies all of the specifications suggested in the Space Needs Study in relation to site area and location. In addition, 799 Biermann is on the market at a reasonable price, and has an existing building in very good condition which is an appropriate size and layout, creating a good opportunity for adaptive reuse. 799 Biermann Court is located within Kensington Business Center, and is an end parcel on a cul-de-sac. However, this lot also fronts on Kensington Road, an IDOT roadway which allows quick access to Rand Road. Although police maintains presence throughout the Village at all times, there are certain emergency situations that would require immediate response from officers stationed at the headquarters. The Police Chief has confirmed that this proposed location is excellent with regard to anticipated response should this type of incident occur. Stan has apProacneU DO -1 �0 urit; rl-lIuE ;` acct;; t:. Kcn:;': d be permitted. IDOT staff indicated that they will work with us to permit the driveway access for Police business. The size and good condition of the Biermann Court property is the potential for adaptive reuse of the existing building. Built in 1982, this 103,226 square foot building has been well maintained and has adequate space for current police operations as well as room for potential growth. Its existing high ceiling heights (24 feet) and skylights provide design opportunities that would cost significantly more to build into a new construction project today. The building's flexibility in design allows for the following key components to a successful police headquarters: barrier free communication, modern training facilities, and efficient and safe layout for everyday processes. One of the greatest communication and morale hindrances in a police facility is administration and operations being separated. This building would ensure that all law enforcement functions are located on the same floor. In addition, a single -floor design allows for realistic firearms training where a vehicle can be driven into the firing range. From a practical process improvement standpoint, an at -grade evidence garage aiiows far a flatbed to deliveran evidentiary motorvehicle, which is impossible in an underground evidence garage. The proposed internal layout of the facility will allow for greater separation of witnesses and victims from offenders, something lacking in the Village's current headquarters. Anticipated Costs Preliminary construction cost estimates provided in the Space Needs Study for a completely new Police Station of this size were in the range of $32 million dollars, not including land purchase, furniture, equipment, or design fees. By performing an adaptive reuse of the existing building at 799 Biermann, the Village expects the construction costs to be in the range of $22 million dollars. This estimated savings of $10 million will be realized through the reuse of the existing building foundations and exterior walls; the existing steel roof structure; the existing roof deck, insulation, and roofing. In addition, the existing electrical, plumbing, mechanical and fire protection services; and the existing site components like pavement, curbs, and stormwater systems can all be reused and are suitable for the proposed use. The reuse of all these components and systems would not only save on material costs, but also labor, excavation, site preparation, and haul away costs. The majority of the site is expected to be mostly untouched, white the building itself would likely require cosmetic facade changes to about 213 of the exterior. The north elevation will be redesigned and reconstructed to add architectural design features appropriate for a municipal police headquarters. While the cost estimates detailed above are preliminary, they have been provided by contractors that specialize in Police Station construction within the Chicagoland market. Typically a project of this scope would take 12 to 15 months to construct, with the initial goal of breaking ground in late 2018 or early 2019. Due Diliggrice The purchase of this property has several items of note, as the building is currently in use. First and foremost, it's important to note the purchase contract is written and agreed upon by the buyer with a forty-five (45) clay due diligence period, which includes a clause that allows the Village to terminate the contract at the Village Board's discretion. During this due diligence period, Staff will be working on several items associated with the property. There is a tenant (Advocate Health Care) currently utilizing approximately half of the building's square footage. Staff will be meeting with Advocate to discuss their lease, and also evaluate relocation options in Mount Prospect. CVS, the subject property's neighbor immediately west of the site, currently has a lease for 70 parking spaces on the 799 Biermann Court property. It is staff's intention to work with CV5 to continue this lease, due to a shortage of parking for their facility at 800 Biermann Court. A concept is being developed to construct additional parking on site to facilitate this need. The Village will also complete Phase I Environmental Report with True North during this due diligence period. Architectural Design and Construction The Village will be working with FGM Architects to prepare concept plans and elevations, which will be used for the planned public open house on March 27 and upcoming Committee of the Whole and Board meetings. The goal is to have a preliminary interior building layout completed, along with two possible exterior designs for the building, One design would be a traditional masonry design that looks like many municipal buildings throughout the metro area. The second design is meant to provide a more modern exterior design that includes metal panel and glass, mixed with stone and brick. Neither of these designs will be final, but will provide a basis for discussion on the major concepts for exterior design moving forward. In addition, several examples of interior spaces will be provided for our existing Police Station versus what those same spaces would look like in a modern facility. Although FGM will help assist the Village with concept plans, an RFP for architectural services will be released March 7. In addition to an RFP for architectural services, the Village will also release an RFP for a construction manager— (at risk) on March 7. Submittals from both architects and construction managers are expected back before the end of March, and the results of this process will be presented to the Board on the April 10 Committee of the Whole meeting. The architect and construction manager play a significant role in keeping costs in line throughout the design process by working hand in hand with Staff to balance the value of the space within the building without exceeding cost expectations. FinancinPlan Staff has been working with the Village's financial advisor PMA on a funding plan for the purchase and construction of a new police headquarters at 799 Biermann Court. The plan will be structured to ensure the current tax levy plan is not impacted/increased. Elements of the plan include the refinancing of callable Series 2009 bonds, use of capitalized interest, and the planned drawdown of excess reserves. The refinancing of the Series 2009 bonds will be consistent with past practice where the amortization schedule of the refunded bonds will not extend beyond that of the original issue. Savings will be front loaded to allow capacity for the new debt. The new debt is expected to be issued in October 2018 and amortized over a period of twenty -rive Tars at an esvmaIeciifltQrt'Si rate Ui 3.9�)%. Dr-pei, Jlag a i p-is5iblc -Il utu e debt financing needs of the Library, the planned drawdown of excess reserves is between $650K and $2.1 million. This approach allows this critical project to move forward without raising property taxes. fnciuded with this memo is a preliminary schedule of principal and interest for the Series 201$ bonds along with savings as a result of the Series 2009 bond refinancing and annual change in debt service. Recommendation The issues with the current Police Headquarters have been documented both through the Space Needs Study and through the details of everyday experiences of our officers and staff. The 799 Biermann Court property provides an opportunity to cure a critical limitation of our current facility. The adaptive re -use of the building allows for significant savings when cc) mpared to constructing a new building, and is an ideal fit for a modern police headquarters. Staff recommends approval of the resolution in support of the contract to purchase 799 Biermann Court. U N:f P R 0 S P FE T P 0 L PC F H E A D Q-5, U A R -C E R S FGM ARC11TECTS 02016 FGM A RC H ITECI 5, INC. 03/16/18 I,WZ 4d 2roul - CONCEPTUALaIA- GRAM M 'ham' LO '+r [ O S P E, (. T P O L I CIi y& ill l:. A !.s �UARlE;R,S__i CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR DESIGN 1 CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR DESIGN 2 FGM ARCHITECTS L____ au`.w.�nw�.x..�w+r.�sr+wwr..ou.f.wK�ra�e - �M�4�u�wn� LL z 0 2 um. 0 IBJ 41 (JIJIAkJN3NG live e VIWM Ow, 4A N, q')O Vili qQ1, ui LL z 0 2 um. 0 IBJ 41 (JIJIAkJN3NG live e VIWM Ow, C I Y I I k� l 40 r Sam Schwartz Consulting, L.L.C. Sam 303 W. Erie Street, Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60654 phone: (773) 305-0800 Schwartz samschwartz.com Transportation Consultants Memorandum To: Matt Lawrie, P.E. From: Kelly Conolly, P.E. and Kathleen Murphy, P.E. Date: April 4,2o16 Re: Traffic Analysis Memorandum Mount Prospect Police Station Project No: 18-03-1400 Sam Schwartz Consulting, LLC (Sam Schwartz) was retained by the Village of Mount Prospect to conduct a preliminary traffic analysis for the potential relocation of the Village's police station from Downtown Mount Prospect to 799 Biermann Court. Access is proposed via two new access drives on Kensington Road - one full access drive at the northwest corner of the site and one exit - only access drive at the northeast corner of the site - and an existing access drive on Biermann Court. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the impact of the proposed access system on Kensington Road, the Kensington Business Center, and the surrounding neighborhood. The following memo presents and documents our methodology, data collection, and access analyses, and identifies potential improvements, as necessary, to accommodate site -generated traffic demand. The study area is illustrated on Figure 1. All "Figures" referenced in the memorandum are included at the end of the document. Existing Street Characteristics The following is relevant information pertaining to the roadway network, traffic controls, and roadway lane usage. • Kensington Road is a two-lane major collector under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (I DOT). • The nearest traffic signals are located on Kensington Road at its intersections with Wheeling Road (1,350 feet west) and Wolf Road (3,600 feet east). • The posted speed limit on Kensington Road is 45 mph. Existing Traffic Volumes The Village of Mount Prospect provided Sam Schwartz with weekday morning (7:15 to 8:15 AM) peak hour and weekday evening (5:00 to 6:00 PM) peak hour traffic counts at the intersection of Kensington Road and Rand Road. Those counts, conducted in 2015, were used to determine the peak hour traffic volumes on Kensington Road in the vicinity of the site. Peak hour counts, conducted in 2009, were also provided by the Village for Biermann Court, Brentwood Lane, and Hemlock Lane. According to the ]DOT database and traffic data conducted in 2009 for the Village, daily traffic volumes on the streets in the vicinity of the site are as follows: Mount Prospect Police Station April 4, 2018 • Kensington Road — 8,100 vehicles per day (vpd) • Biermann Court — 1,662 vpd • Brentwood Lane — 487 vpd • Hemlock Lane — 610 vpd Development Plans The proposed development consists of converting the existing industrial building at 799 Biermann Court to the Mount Prospect police headquarters. The facility will consist of 87,000 square feet of offices, storage, training, holding, structured parking, etc. accommodating 83 officers over three work shifts and 22 administrative employees. The site plan shows adding two new access drives on Kensington Road — one full access drive at the northwest corner of the site and one exit -only access drive at the northeast corner of the site. There is also an existing access drive on Biermann Court that will remain. In addition to indoor parking for public safety vehicles, surface parking for 181 vehicles is shown, including 20 visitor parking spaces at the front of the building along Kensington Road. Trip Generation The estimate of peak hour traffic that will be generated by the proposed use was based on national trip generation surveys/rates provided in Trip Generation, 10th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The total trips to be generated by the development is detailed in Table 1, as well as the applicable Land Use Code reference. Table 1: Estimated TriD Generation Land Use/ Size ITE LUC No. of Peak Hour Trips AM Peak PM Peak In Out Total In Out Total Government Office / 105 ,employees 730 65 25 90 15 55 70 The site -generated traffic volumes were assigned to the roadway system assuming an equal split in directional distribution from each cardinal direction. Traffic from the south was assumed to use the existing Biermann Court access drive, and traffic from the other three directions was split evenly between the east and west directions on Kensington Road. Figure 2 illustrates the directional distribution percentages and the Projected Traffic condition which is the sum of existing traffic plus the site traffic assignments. Auxiliary Lane Analysis Turn lane warrant criteria and design standards in the IDOT Bureau of Design and Environment (BIDE) Manual for roadways with a design speed of 50 MPH were used to determine if right- or left -turn lane improvements might be required on Kensington Road at the future site access driveway. Similar to nearby minor street intersections with Kensington Road, auxiliary turn lanes are not required. According to IDOT BIDE Manual Figure 36-3.A, shown in Figure 3, an eastbound right- Mount Prospect Police Station 3 April 4, 2018 turn deceleration lane is not required to accommodate site -generated traffic. And according to IDOT BIDE Manual Figure 36-3.E, shown in Figure 4, a westbound left -turn lane is not required to accommodate site -generated traffic. Kensington Road would also not require widening for an acceleration lane according to guidance in Section 36-2.03(e) as it is not typical to provide those after a stop sign condition, particularly on a low volume driveway. Capacity Analysis Intersection capacity analyses were utilized to analyze the access drives under Total Traffic conditions for the weekday peak hours using the methodologies outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)'. The effectiveness of an intersection's operation is measured in terms of Level of Service ("LOS"), which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average total delay experienced by each vehicle passing through an intersection. Level of Service A is the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at -capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The capacity analysis results are summarized in Table 2 and the worksheets containing the intersection analyses are provided in the Appendix. Table 2: Intersection Level -of -Service " Average control delay in seconds per vehicle. Site Access The results in the table show that all movements at both proposed access drives on Kensington Road will operate well at LOS B during peak hours. Overall, traffic will be able to exit the site with minimal delay and enter the Kensington Road traffic stream. The results of the capacity analysis show a maximum outbound queue of no more than one vehicle during the peak hour of the day. Access will also remain on Biermann Court. Parking for the adjacent property may continue to use the Biermann Court driveway, as well as site traffic to and from the south. At most, approximately 15 vehicles in and out will use this driveway during any one hour of the day, so minimal additional traffic is expected through the Kensington Business Center — a vehicle every two minutes during the peak hour. In comparison, Biermann Court carries over 300 vehicles during the peak hour of the day and over 1,600 throughout the day. 'Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2010. Projected Traffic Intersection/Peak Hour/Lane AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour LOS (Delay A) LOS (Delay A) Kensington Road Full Access Kensington Rd WB LT A (8.3) A (8.0) Kensington Rd WB Thru A (0.0) A (0.0) Driveway NB B (12.4) B (13.5) Kensington Road Exit Access Driveway NB B (12.1) B (13.1) " Average control delay in seconds per vehicle. Site Access The results in the table show that all movements at both proposed access drives on Kensington Road will operate well at LOS B during peak hours. Overall, traffic will be able to exit the site with minimal delay and enter the Kensington Road traffic stream. The results of the capacity analysis show a maximum outbound queue of no more than one vehicle during the peak hour of the day. Access will also remain on Biermann Court. Parking for the adjacent property may continue to use the Biermann Court driveway, as well as site traffic to and from the south. At most, approximately 15 vehicles in and out will use this driveway during any one hour of the day, so minimal additional traffic is expected through the Kensington Business Center — a vehicle every two minutes during the peak hour. In comparison, Biermann Court carries over 300 vehicles during the peak hour of the day and over 1,600 throughout the day. 'Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2010. Mount Prospect Police Station April 4, 2018 rd Neighborhood Impact Given the limited amount of traffic that the police station will generate overall and the distribution of traffic across the community boundaries, minimal additional traffic is expected on the local streets north of the proposed site. At most, 5 to 10 additional vehicles might be expected during the two peak hours of the day. Conclusion The existing roadway and planned access drive system will adequately accommodate the expected increase in traffic from the development of the site. No auxiliary turn lanes will be required on Kensington Road. J -0 9 >0 !: y, > i CD - ,s �. a 1 -� V C rB E y N CO R a a i Sam Schwartz Engineering D.P.C. N Not to Scale Ironwood Dr Kensington Rd SITE ■ M — _ OLi► J F xx =Weekday AM Peak Hour (7:15 - 8:15 am) (xx) = Weekday PM Peak Hour (5:00 - 6:00 pm) 7W = Proposed Stop Sign = = Average Daily Traffic 185 (460) Kensington Rd 25 (5) (320) 395 (5) 25Ln Ln X37.5%� U. ,l SITE 1 5 (15) Full Site Access (Existing) Sam Schwartz Engineering D.F.C. (335) 400 y i Q in >+ I C O ' XI W i (5)15 ' �Ln N Not to Scale —4-37.5%-0-- 205 (460) Figure 2 Directional Distribution and Total Traffic Volumes 120 II a- 7 0 8C C rn w rn 6C E O 7 c 4C 20 0 N, Right -Turn Be Considered Lane Should -Turn Lane May Nat Be Necessary Right AM Peak: DHV = 420 vph, Right Tur s = 25 vph PM Peak: D V = 325 vph, Right Turns 5 V h 100 200 300 400 500 DHV, In One Direction (VPH) 600 7070 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT -TURN LANES AT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS Figure 36-3.A Sam Schwartz Engineering D.F.C. N Not to Scale Figure 3 IDOT Right Turn Guidelines Q Q a Q 0 Q O Q� R [p n V' 1'] N "- anoH ubisoq bupnp (HdA) ownIOA buisoddp — OA LU N J Q Z (D Z ❑ Q V) LU M Z 'O LU Q7 6L 1 ❑ U- Z ❑ J C Z E 0 Q O N V " LU LV Z I) J O� LU LUW J 0 W M CD M L Q1 LL Sam Figure 4 Schwartz IDOT Left Turn Guidelines Engineering D.P.C. C C C L C H U c � U U ca – C A 'O L M 3C -0 L.2 N r CJ V Q N U E .r3 s L 2 NC N W ❑ A A _.-. 0 a IIQ O N .L-. 'v 117 . — ❑ O N D U❑ U 0. (nQ7 0 U U _ C C ++ > Qj C � 7 � o # ° N a a � -� a Q7 �- "k € �. Q1 •- o U c .-. Q7 - " Q7 U U Q7 L U m —C C C .� p Co > N C t A p7 s CL s !z r- N ❑ " N Q7 Q7 5 > WaN.� �...�+ v O A �. ."sr., o o O 1 nN woA 1 r- N A A M > > A N u7 N p A C O U D my 47 C 0-0 ❑ A.� ;, C U7 N ❑ C ❑ N O A 'r > [7 V •0 E .p Q1 N N 7 Q1 ❑ > > W > 'CSL ,j Q s Q v NU C CT T3 N e17 U ••C C N O L N ._ C ,C N s w 47 a .c :5 3::-o n'_ p Z O +- i7 N Q Q a Q 0 Q O Q� R [p n V' 1'] N "- anoH ubisoq bupnp (HdA) ownIOA buisoddp — OA LU N J Q Z (D Z ❑ Q V) LU M Z 'O LU Q7 6L 1 ❑ U- Z ❑ J C Z E 0 Q O N V " LU LV Z I) J O� LU LUW J 0 W M CD M L Q1 LL Sam Figure 4 Schwartz IDOT Left Turn Guidelines Engineering D.P.C. C H U c i C (D ca – o N \ 3 -0 w N V oII¢ IIQ N > > J C � 7 � o J U J s CL s !z > > o o O 1 nN II M D II �Y❑ > ,j Q s Q > . 1n 1O _ O a Q Q a Q 0 Q O Q� R [p n V' 1'] N "- anoH ubisoq bupnp (HdA) ownIOA buisoddp — OA LU N J Q Z (D Z ❑ Q V) LU M Z 'O LU Q7 6L 1 ❑ U- Z ❑ J C Z E 0 Q O N V " LU LV Z I) J O� LU LUW J 0 W M CD M L Q1 LL Sam Figure 4 Schwartz IDOT Left Turn Guidelines Engineering D.P.C. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station 799 Biermann Court Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 PREPARED FOR Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 PRFPAR.FD BY True North Consultants, Inc. 1240 Iroquois Avenue, Suite 206 Naperville, Illinois 60563 Tele: 630.717.2880 PROJECT NUMBER T118149 SUBMITTED ON April 4, 2018 NENVIRONMENT: INFRASTRUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT II/_114* &CalZk14'11P 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................I 2.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................3 2.1 PROPERTY LOCATION AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................... 3 2.2 PURPOSE...............................................................................................................................................................................................................3 11 2.3 DEFINITIONS......................................................................................................................................................................................................3 2.4 SCOPE OF SERVICES.................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.5 ASSUMPTIONS...................................................................................................................................................................................................5 20 2.6 LIMITATIONS......................................................................................................................................................................................................5 22 2.7 DEVIATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS........................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.8 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.9 USER RELIANCE...............................................................................................................................................................................................7 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION.................................................................................................................8 3.1 OWNER, PROPERTY MANAGER, AND OCCUPANT INFORMATION............................................................................. 8 3.2 REASON FOR PERFORMING ASSESSMENT.................................................................................................................................. 8 3.3 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS................................................................................ 8 3.4 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.5 VALUATION RED UCTIONFOR ENVIRONMENTALISS UES ...............................................................................................9 3.6 COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION........................................................... 9 3.7 OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF RELEASES............................................................................................................................................10 3.8 TITLE RECORDS.............................................................................................................................................................................................10 3.9 OTHER....................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................11 4.1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE..................................................................................................................................................................11 4.2 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW................................................................................................................. 11 4.2.1 Federal Standard Database Review.........................................................................................................................................................11 4.2.2 State and Tribal Standard Database Review...............................................................................................................................16 4.3 ADDITIONAL FEDERAL, STATE, TRIBAL, AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES ........ 20 4.4 ORPHAN SITE SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.5 REGULATORYAGENCY FILE AND RECORDS REVIEW..................................................................................................... 22 4.6 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION.................................................................................................................................................... 22 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE.............................................................................................................................27 5.1 METHODOLOGYAND LIMITING CONDITIONS........................................................................................................................27 5.2 GENERAL SITE SETTING........................................................................................................................................................................27 5.2.1 Current Use(s) of the Property.....................................................................................................................................................................27 5.2.2 Past Use(s) of the Property..............................................................................................................................................................................28 5.2.3 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties and Surrounding Area.......................................................................29 5.2.4 Past Uses of the Adjoining Properties and Surrounding Area.................................................................................29 5.3 EXTERIOR OBSERVATIONS..................................................................................................................................................................30 5.4 INTERIOR OBSERVATIONS................................................................................................................................................................... 32 6.0 INTERVIEWS................................................................................................................................................... 36 Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > Table of Contents NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 6.1 CURRENT OWNER INTERVIEW.......................................................................................................................................................... 36 6.2 KEY SITE MANAGER INTERVIEW.................................................................................................................................................... 36 6.3 CURRENT OCCUPANT INTERVIEW(S).......................................................................................................................................... 36 6.4 PAST OWNERS, OPERATORS, AND OCCUPANTS.................................................................................................................36 6.5 LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL INTERVIEW(S)................................................................................................................. 36 6.6 OTHER PERTINENT INTERVIEWS....................................................................................................................................................37 7.0 EVALUATION.................................................................................................................................................. 38 7.1 FINDINGS...........................................................................................................................................................................................................38 7.2 OPINIONS........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 7.3 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 7.4 ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION............................................................................................................................................................ 38 7.5 DATA GAPS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS................................................................................................................................. 38 7.6 DELETIONS.......................................................................................................................................................................................................39 7.7 SIGNATURES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT.................................................................... 39 8.0 ADDITIONAL (NON -SCOPE) SERVICES...................................................................................................40 8.1 ASBESTOS -CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS...............................................................................................................40 8.2 FLOODPLAINS.................................................................................................................................................................................................40 8.3 WETLANDS.......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 8.4 RADON....................................................................................................................................................................................................................41 8.5 LEAD-BASED PAINT.................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 8.6 LEAD IN DRINKING WATER...................................................................................................................................................................41 8.7 INDOOR AIR QUALITY................................................................................................................................................................................ 41 8.8 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS......................................................................................................................................................................41 9.0 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................................................42 FIGURES 1. SITE LOCATION MAP 2. SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USE MAP 3. SITE DETAIL MAP APPENDICES A. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS B. QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS) C. USER PROVIDED DOCUMENTS D. RADIUS MAP REPORT E. RECORDS OF COMMUNICATION F. ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH REPORT G. FIRE INSURANCE MAPS H. CITY DIRECTORIES I. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS J. HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > Table of Contents NENVIRONMENT: INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY True North Consultants, Inc. (True North) performed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (E1527-13), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) All Appropriate Inquiry (40 CFR 312), and True North's proposal to Village of Mount Prospect (Village) for the Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station site located at 799 Biermann Court in Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the property). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this process are described in Sections 2.7 and 7.6 of this report. The assumptions and limitations considered by True North during the course of this Phase I ESA, in addition to those identified within E1527-13, are described in Sections 2.5 and 2.6, respectively. The property consists of an approximate 5.5 -acre parcel of land identified by the parcel number 03-35-104-006. The property is currently developed with an approximate 103,126 -square foot, single -story office/warehouse building and associated asphalt paved parking. The remainder of the property includes landscaped areas. The property is currently occupied by Advocate Health Care Logistics Center for pamphlet printing and logistic support operations. The remainder of the building is currently vacant. The current site conditions date back to 2011. The Village is proposing to purchase the property for renovation and future police station use. Topography at the property and surrounding area generally slopes to the southeast, toward the Feehanville Ditch. The following presents a tabular summary of findings of this ESA. This assessment, conducted in accordance with the ASTM E1527-13 scope, limitations, and assumptions identified herein, has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page I REC No REC Phase I ESA Category Comment/ Reference Identified Identified User Information No significant concerns noted / Refer to Section 3.0 for further information Regulatory Records Review No significant concerns noted / Refer to Section 4.0 for further information Historical Records Review No significant concerns noted / Refer to Section 4.0 for further information No significant concerns noted / Refer to Section Site Reconnaissance 5.0 for further information Interviews No significant concerns noted / Refer to Section 6.0 for further information This assessment, conducted in accordance with the ASTM E1527-13 scope, limitations, and assumptions identified herein, has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page I NENVIRONMENT: INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA, no additional investigation or inquiry into recognized environmental conditions is recommended by True North. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 2 Y ENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Property Location and Legal Description The Village of Mount Prospect (Village) of 50 South Emerson Street in Mount Prospect, Illinois retained True North to conduct a Phase I ESA of the following property: Address 799 Biermann Court in Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois Permanent Tax 03-35-104-006 Number(s) LOT 2 IN KENSINGTON CENTER RESUBDIVISION IV OF LOTS 2 & 3 IN Legal Description KENSINGTON CENTER PHASE 2 IN THE NORTHWEST '/ OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS 2.2 Purpose The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to identify, to the extent feasible, the presence or likely presence of recognized environmental conditions (REC) in connection with the property. The purpose of a Phase I ESA is to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) liability (landowner liability protections). A Phase I ESA constitutes all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of a property consistent with good commercial or customary practice. 2.3 Definitions ASTM defines the following related terms utilized throughout the Phase I ESA report. Additional terminology is defined in ASTM E 1537-13. All appropriate inquiries — that inquiry constituting all appropriate inquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial and customary practices as defined in CERCLA 42 USC § 9601 (35) (B), that will qualify a party to a commercial real estate transaction for CERLCA liability (42 USC § 9601 (35) (A) and (B), § 9607 (b) (3), § 9607 (q), and § 9607 (r)), assuming compliance with other elements of the defense. • Hazardous substance - a substance defined as hazardous pursuant to CERCLA 42 USC § 9601 (14), and as interpreted by USEPA regulations and the courts. Petroleum product - those substances included within the meaning of the petroleum exclusion to CERCLA 42 USC § 9601 (14), as interpreted by the courts and USEPA, that is: petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof which is not otherwise specifically listed or designated as a hazardous substance under Subparagraphs (A) through (F) of CERCLA 42 USC § 9601 (14), natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, and synthetic gas usable for fuel (or Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 3 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT mixtures of natural gas and such synthetic gas). • Recognized environmental condition - the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions. • Historical recognized environmental condition - a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before calling the past release a historical recognized environmental condition, the environmental professional must determine whether the past release is a recognized environmental condition at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted (for example, if there has been a change in the regulatory criteria). • Controlled recognized environmental condition - a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). • Migrate /migration - for purposes of this practice, "migrate" and "migration" refers to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form, including, for example, solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface. • De minimis condition - a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environmental and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions nor controlled recognized environmental conditions. 2.4 Scope of Services This ESA was performed and completed in accordance with the general guidelines of ASTM E1527-13 and True North's January 5, 2018 proposal to the Village. The scope of services for the Phase I ESA, under the guidelines of the ASTM standard, includes four main components: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 4 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT • Environmental Record Review — Review of standard federal, state, and tribal record sources, additional federal, state, tribal and local environmental record sources, physical setting sources, and standard historical sources. • Site Reconnaissance — Conduct a site visit to record on-site observations of existing conditions, obtain any pertinent field data, observe physical characteristics of the property and associated structures, identify current site operations, and observe surrounding property conditions and operations. • Interviews — To the extent reasonable and possible, interview past and present property owners, occupants of the property, and state and local government officials with the purpose of obtaining information indicating recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. • Report — Prepare Phase I ESA report containing documentation to support the findings, opinions, and conclusions. 2.5 Assumptions In performing this Phase I ESA, True North made the following assumptions: • Information obtained from interviews, record reviews, government records is complete and accurate. "An environmental professional is not required to verify independently the information provided but may rely on information provided unless he or she has actual knowledge that certain information is incorrect or unless it is obvious that certain information is incorrect based on other information obtained in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment or otherwise actually known to the environmental professional," in accordance with Section 7.5.2.1 of ASTM E1527-13. • Geologic and hydrogeologic conditions at the property are assumed to be consistent with information available within or inferred from various resources. Resources may include, but are not necessarily limited to, maps, site or regional - specific subsurface data, and other any other technical information, such as that information available from federal, state, and local agencies. 2.6 Limitations In performing this Phase I ESA, the following limitations exist: • A Phase I ESA does not include the testing or sampling of the surface and subsurface soil, water, groundwater, soil gas, air, or building materials located on the property. • A Phase I ESA is not intended to address environmental issues that are considered beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA, (e.g., asbestos -containing materials, radon, lead-based paint, wetland investigations, indoor air quality) unless specifically requested by the user and included in Section 8.0. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 5 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT A Phase I ESA does not address whether requirements in addition to all appropriate inquiries have been met in order to qualify for the landowner liability protections. For example, a Phase I ESA does not address the duty to take reasonable steps to prevent releases, or the duty to comply with legally required release reporting obligations. Additional requirements necessary to qualify for landowner liability protections are specified in USC § 9607(b)(3)(a) and (b) and cited in Appendix XI of ASTM E1527-13. This report contains information and opinions that are limited to the date the report was issued. No additional site reconnaissance activities, data review or other investigation of the property have been performed by True North since the date of this report. True North makes no representation with respect to, nor expresses any opinion about, the property after the date of the report. True North does not assume any obligation to update this report for any purpose whatsoever. Performance of this Phase I ESA is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty of environmental conditions associated with the property. True North is unable to represent that the property or adjoining properties contain no hazardous waste, petroleum products, or other conditions beyond that detected or observed by True North during Phase I ESA activities. The possibility for contaminants to migrate through surface and subsurface soil, water, groundwater or air always exists. The scope of this ESA cannot completely address the environmental risks associated with migration in these media. The ASTM standard and AAI do not impose on the environmental professional the responsibility to undertake a review of recorded land title records and judicial records for environmental liens and activity and use limitations unless specifically included as an additional scope of work item in the proposal and acceptance agreement. Site reconnaissance activities were performed with the intention to review areas that may present potential environmental conditions. True North cannot assert that all areas of the property presenting these conditions were reviewed during on-site activities. 2.7 Deviations and Exceptions The proposed scope of work did not include any deviations from or exceptions to the ASTM Standard. 2.8 Special Terms and Conditions This Phase I ESA was completed in accordance with the acceptance agreement authorized by the Village and subject to the noted terms, conditions, and limitations. Per Section 6.2 of ASTM E1527-13, "Unless added by a change in the scope of work to be performed by the environmental professional, this practice does not impose on the environmental professional the responsibility to undertake a review of recorded land Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 6 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT title records and judicial records for environmental liens and AULs. The user should either (1) engage a title company, real estate attorney, or title professional to undertake a review of reasonably ascertainable recorded land title records and lien records for environmental liens and AULs currently recorded against or relating to the property, or (2) negotiate such an engagement of a title company, real estate attorney, or title professional as an addition to the scope of work to be performed by the environmental professional." In accordance with the accepted agreement authorized by the Village, True North engaged Advanced Searches to perform a search for environmental liens and AULs. 2.9 User Reliance This assessment and report was prepared on behalf and for the exclusive use of the Village (user), its agents, and attorneys. The report and its findings shall not, in whole or in part, be disseminated or conveyed to another party, nor used by another party in whole or in part, without prior written consent by True North, except as permitted by the ASTM standard. In accordance with Section 4.6 of the ASTM standard, an environmental site assessment must have been completed "less than 180 days prior to the date of acquisition of the property or (for transactions not involving an acquisition) the date of the intended transaction" to be considered valid. In addition, and environmental site assessment "for which the information was collected or updated within one year prior to the date of acquisition of the property or (for transactions not involving an acquisition) the date of the intended transaction may be used" provided that components of the inquiries were conducted or updated within 180 days of the date of purchase or the date of the intended transaction. These updated components include interviews, site reconnaissance, historical records review, search of environmental liens, and declaration of the environmental professional responsible for the assessment or update. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 7 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION The user, as defined by the ASTM standard, is "the party seeking to use Practice E1527-13 to complete a Phase I ESA of the property. A user may include, without limitation, a potential purchaser or the property; a potential tenant of the property; an owner of the property; a lender, or a property manager." The Village is identified as the user of this ESA. Mr. Mark Rysavy of the Village completed the User Questionnaire to assist True North with obtaining information that will help identify the presence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. A copy of the completed questionnaire and other documents provided by the User are included in Appendix C. 3.1 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information Landowner Gemstone Mount Prospect Industrial, LLC c/o Torburn Partners, Inc. Property Manager Same as owner Occupants Advocate Health, partially vacant 3.2 Reason for Performing Assessment The Village, the prospective purchaser, indicated to True North that the Phase I ESA is being performed to qualify for a landowner liability protection to CERCLA liability prior to acquisition. 3.3 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations An environmental lien is described by ASTM as a charge, security, or encumbrance upon title to a property to secure the payment of a cost, damage, debt, obligation, or duty arising out of response actions, cleanup, or other remediation of hazardous substances or petroleum products upon a property, including (but not limited to) liens imposed pursuant to CERCLA 42 USC § 9607(1) and 9607(r) and similar state or local laws." Activity and use limitations (AULs) are defined by ASTM as "legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site of facility; (1) to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and/or surface water on the property, or (2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restriction, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls, are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil, soil vapor, groundwater, and/or surface water on the property. " Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 8 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT The Village indicated that they have no knowledge of environmental liens or AULs associated with the property. In accordance with the accepted agreement authorized by the Village, True North engaged Advanced Searches to perform a search for environmental liens and AULs. No environmental liens or deed restrictions were noted. A copy of the Environmental Lien Search Report is included in the appendices. 3.4 Specialized Knowledge Specialized knowledge is that information held by the user with regard to the property, the area surrounding the property, the conditions of adjoining properties, as well as other experience relative to the inquires that may be applicable to identifying conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases at the property. The Village indicated that the property was historically occupied by a number of printers; however, they were self-contained printing machines and not ink and roller systems. 3.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues The user should consider whether or not the purchase, lease, assessment or appraisal price of the property reflects the fair market value of the property, assuming that the property is not contaminated. The Village indicated that the purchase, lease, assessment or appraisal price reasonably reflects the fair market value of the property. 3.6 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information includes information about the property that generally is known to the public within the community where the property is located and can be easily sought and found from individuals familiar with the property or from easily attainable public sources of information. This type of information includes the past uses of the property, knowledge of any specific chemicals present or once present on the property, knowledge of any spills or other chemical releases that have taken place on the property, and knowledge of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property. The Village indicated that they are not aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 9 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 3.7 Obvious Indicators of Releases The Village indicated to True North that there are not any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of releases at the property. 3.8 Title Records True North was not provided with a Commitment of Title Insurance for the property. No title records were reviewed as part of this assessment. 3.9 Other True North requested additional documents (if available) from the Village that may help to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. The Village provided True North with the following previous reports for the property: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated May 13, 2011 and prepared by Hygieneering, Inc. Based on information provided in the 2011 ESA report, the property was occupied by Advocate Health Care and a vacant suite during the site reconnaissance. Advocate had occupied the property since 1996. Advocate utilized a small portion of the property for printing of pamphlets and labels. The vacant suite was formerly occupied by Amada Engineering for a sheet metal fabrication equipment showroom. The report noted that the property and 340 - acres of the surrounding area, had been historically utilized as a natural gas reservoir system facility between 1940 through 1980 for North Shore Gas, which was dismantled in the 1980s. This finding is discussed further in Section 7.2. Hygineering did not identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. A Limited ACM Assessment, dated May 26, 2011 and prepared by Hygieneering, Inc. The assessment included analyses of six homogeneous groups for asbestos content. The analytical results did not identify the presence of any ACM within the sampled materials. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 10 Y ENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 Physical Setting Source Based on a review of the Arlington Heights, Illinois 7.5 -minute USGS topographic map, property resides at an elevation of approximately 650 to 655 feet above mean sea level. The property and surrounding areas are relatively flat with a slight topographical slope to the southeast. It is inferred that the hydraulic gradient follows the general local topography to the southeast, toward the Feehanville Ditch, which is located approximately 1,200 feet southeast of the property. True North reviewed online information from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey for property soils information. The property was identified as being underlain by Mundelein silt loam with 0 to 2 percent slopes and Grays silt loam with 2 to 4 percent slopes. Typical soil profiles consist of 0 to 11 inches of silt loam underlain by 11 to 34 inches of silty clay loam, 34 to 42 silt loam and loam, and 42 to 60 inches of stratified sandy loam to silt loam. These soils are somewhat poorly drained to moderately well drained and have a high capacity to store water. According to the Bedrock Geology of Illinois, geology beneath the property consists of Silurian -aged limestone and dolomite. 4.2 Standard Environmental Records Review Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) performed an environmental regulatory database search for the property surrounding properties within respective ASTM recommended minimum search distances. These records include only the sites that have been reported to the applicable regulatory agency for environmental tracking, confirmed contaminant releases, or potential contaminant releases at the time of the report publication. Note that for some databases, EDR increased the search distances beyond the minimum search distance outlined by ASTM. A copy of the EDR's report is included in Appendix D. 4.2.1 Federal Standard Database Review NPL 1.0 0 0 0 NPL Proposed NPL 1.0 0 0 0 NPL Liens Prone rty 0 0 Delisted NPL Delisted NPL 1.0 0 0 0 Federal CERCLIS Federal Facility 0.5 0 0 0 Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 11 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT National Priority List (NPL) The NPL is a database maintained by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to track abandoned and/or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites identified for priority action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Superfund Program. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 1.0 -mile search distance were listed within the NPL database. Proposed NPL This database includes sites that have been proposed for listing on the NPL through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. USEPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 1.0 -mile search distance were listed within the Proposed NPL database. NPL Liens This database includes sites that have been filed notices of Superfund Liens by USEPA. The USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. for listing on the NPL through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 12 Search TotalMinimum Federal F• • • W istance SitesqB Subject• • Database• •ase (miles) Identified 0 Property• 0 • SEMS 0.5 0 CERCLIS NFRAP SEMS -ARCHIVE 0.5 0 0 0 RCRA RCRA CORRACTS 1.0 0 0 0 CORRACTS Non-CORRACTS RCRA non- TSD CORRACTS TSD 0.5 0 0 0 LQG 0.25* 0 0 0 SQG 0.25* 3 0 0 RCRA Generators CESQG 0.25* 5 0 1 LUCIS 0.5 0 0 0 Engineering US Engineering 0.5* 0 0 0 Control/ Institutional Controls US Institutional 0.5* 0 0 0 Control Registries Controls Property ERNS ERNS 0 0 *EDR increased search distance bevond the ASTM annroximate minimum search distance National Priority List (NPL) The NPL is a database maintained by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to track abandoned and/or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites identified for priority action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Superfund Program. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 1.0 -mile search distance were listed within the NPL database. Proposed NPL This database includes sites that have been proposed for listing on the NPL through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. USEPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 1.0 -mile search distance were listed within the Proposed NPL database. NPL Liens This database includes sites that have been filed notices of Superfund Liens by USEPA. The USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. for listing on the NPL through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 12 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT The property was not listed within the NPL Liens database. Delisted NPL The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establish the criteria that the USEPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425 (e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 1.0 -mile search distance were listed within the Delisted NPL database. Federal Facility This database includes a listing of NPL and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the CERCLIS database where USEPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were listed within the Federal Facility database. SEMS The SEMS list is maintained by the USEPA and tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly known as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 0.5 mile search distance were listed within the SEMS database. SEMS -ARCHIVE The SEMS-ARCHNE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 13 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 0.5 mile search distance were listed within the SEMS -ARCHIVE database. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) CORRACTS The (RCRA) Corrective Action Sites (CORRACTS) list is a database maintained by the USEPA and contains information concerning sites which generate, transport, store, treat, and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA with reported corrective action. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 1.0 -mile search distance were listed within the RCRA CORRACTS database. RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD The RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD list is maintained by the USEPA and contains information pertaining to sites that treat, store or dispose (TSD Facility) of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were listed within the RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD list. RCRA Generators The Resource Conservation Recovery Information System (RCRIS) Generators List is maintained by the USEPA and identifies sites that generate hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA). There are three basic categories of generators: conditionally exempt, small quantity, and large quantity. Conditionally exempt generators are facilities that generate less than 100 kilograms (kg) of non - acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQG) are facilities that generate 100 kg to 1,000 kg per month of non -acutely hazardous waste and large quantity generators (LQG) generate greater than 1,000 kg per month of non -acutely hazardous waste. Please note that EDR increased the search distance from the ASTM minimum search distance to one-quarter mile. The property was not listed within the RCRA Generators database. Eight surrounding properties were identified; however, six of the properties were mapped at distances greater than 700 feet from the property. Based on intervening distances and presumed hydraulic gradient, those six properties are not indicative of recognized environmental conditions to the property. The remaining two properties are described below. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 14 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT Address, Direction and Distance 800 Biermann Court, Suite B — west adjoining to the property Databases RCRA CESQG Presumed Hydraulic Cross to up gradient of the property Relationship Status/ Opinion No violations associated with CESQG status. Current RCRA status and nature of the listing is not indicative of a recognized environmental condition. Site Name: Heidelberg USA Inc. Address, Direction and Distance 625 Slawin Court — approximately 400 feet southeast from the property Databases RCRA CESQG Presumed Hydraulic Down gradient of the property Relationship No violations associated with CESQG status. Previously classified as a CESQG Status/ Opinion in 1992. The RCRA status and reviewed information is not indicative of a recognized environmental condition. LUCIS LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 0.5 mile search distance were listed within the LUCIS database. US Enaineerina Controls The US Engineering Controls Listing is maintained by the USEPA and identifies sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Please note that EDR increased the search distance from the ASTM minimum search distance to one-half mile. Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were listed within the US Engineering Controls database. US Institutional Controls The US Institutional Controls Listing is maintained by the USEPA and identifies sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional control. Please note that EDR increased the search distance from the ASTM minimum search distance to one-half mile. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 15 NENVIRONMENT: INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT Neither the property nor any of the surrounding properties within the one-half mile search distance were listed within the US Institutional Controls database. Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) The ERNS database is maintained by the USEPA and contains information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Federal authorities included in release reporting are the USEPA, U.S. Coast Guard, the National Response Center, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. The property was not listed within the ERNS database 4.2.2 State and Tribal Standard Database Review Database Type Database Name Search Distan Jel (mil T tall. 0 s Site Lentified On Subject Property On Adjoining .. Hazardous Waste Sites IL SSU 1.0 0 0 0 Landfill and/or Solid Waste Landfill Sites SWT/LF 0.5 0 0 0 CCDD 0.5 0 0 0 Landfill Special Waste 0.5 0 0 0 HIPC 0.5 0 0 0 Leaking Storage Tank Lists LUST 0.5 1 0 0 Indian LUST 0.5 0 0 0 LUST Trust 0.5 0 0 0 Registered Storage Tank Lists FEMA UST 0.25* 0 0 0 IL UST 0.25* 1 0 0 IL AST 0.25* 3 0 1 Indian UST 0.25* 0 0 0 Institutional Control/ Engineering Control Registries Engineering Controls 0.5* 0 0 0 Institutional Controls 0.5* 0 0 0 Voluntary Cleanup Sites SRP 0.5 0 0 0 Indian VCP 0.5 0 0 0 Brownfield Sites Brownfields 1 0.5 1 0 1 0 1 0 *EDR increased search distance bevond the ASTM annroximate minimum search distance State Sites Unit Listing (IL SSU) IL SSU sites may or may not already be listed on the federal NPL list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where potentially responsible parties will pay for cleanup. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 16 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT The property and surrounding properties within the 1.0 -mile search distance were not listed within the IL SSU database. Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites (SWF/LF) SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) maintains the SWF/LF List. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the SWF/LF database. Clean Construction or Demolition Debris (CCDD) This database includes sites that accept construction and demolition debris considered non -hazardous, uncontaminated material resulting from construction, remodeling, repair, or demolition of utilities, structures and roads. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the CCDD database. Landfill Special Waste This database consists of a list of landfills that accept non -hazardous special waste pursuant to the IEPA Non -Hazardous Special Waste Definition. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile radius were not identified within the Landfill Special Waste database. Illinois Solid Waste Landfill Inventory (NIPC) NIPC is an inventory of active and inactive solid waste disposal sites. This list includes numerous sites which previously had not been identified largely because there was no obligation to register such sites prior to 1971. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the NIPC database. State Leaking, Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) The LUST database is maintained by IEPA and provides a listing of reported LUST incidents. The database, based on reported information, may indicate the status of the site within the IEPA LUST program. The property was not listed within the LUST database. One surrounding property was identified within the 0.5 -mile search distance; however, the property was mapped at a distance greater than 700 feet from the property. Based on intervening distance and Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA ) T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 17 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT presumed hydraulic gradient, the property is not indicative of a recognized environmental condition to the property. Indian LUST This database is maintained by USEPA and contains a list of LUST sites located on Indian land. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the Indian LUST database. LUST Trust This database contains a listing of LUST facilities with insufficient funds available in the Underground Storage Tank Fund. Payment priority is listed by queue date. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the LUST Trust database. FEMA UST This database includes a listing of all FEMA -owned USTs. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.25 -mile search distance were not identified within the FEMA UST database. State Registered Underground Storage Tank List (UST) The UST list identifies USTs regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Please note that EDR increased the search distance from the ASTM minimum search distance to one-quarter mile. The property was not listed within the UST database. One surrounding property was identified within the 0.25 mile search distance; however, the property was mapped at a distance greater than 700 feet from the property. Based on intervening distance and presumed hydraulic gradient, the property is not indicative of a recognized environmental condition to the property. State ReLristered Above Ground StoraLre Tank List (AST) The AST list includes all the aboveground tanks inspected by the Office of State Fire Marshall. Please note that EDR increased the search distance from the ASTM minimum search distance to one-quarter mile. The property was not listed within the AST database. Three surrounding properties were identified within the 0.25 mile search distance; however, one property was mapped at a distance greater than 700 feet from the property. Based on intervening distance and presumed hydraulic gradient, that property is not considered a recognized Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 18 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT environmental condition to the property. The remaining two properties are described below. Mt. Prospect Mail Pharmacy, addressed as 800 Biermann Court, reportedly houses an aboveground bulk storage tank; however, contents and capacity were not reported. The property is located west adjoining to the property. Based on the lack of reported releases and current regulatory status, the AST listing is not considered a recognized environmental condition to the property. Corelink Data Centers, addressed as 800 East Business Center Drive, reportedly houses two 3,200 -gallon aboveground bulk storage tanks; however, contents were not reported. The property was mapped approximately 150 feet southwest of the property. Based on the lack of reported releases, current regulatory status, intervening distance, and presumed hydraulic gradient, the AST listing is not considered a recognized environmental condition to the property. Indian UST The Indian UST list is maintained by USEPA and includes USTs on Indian land. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.25 -mile search distance were not identified within the Indian UST database. State Engineering Controls List The State Engineering Controls Listing is maintained by IEPA and identifies sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Please note that EDR increased the search distance from the ASTM minimum search distance to one-half mile. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the State Engineering Controls database. State Institutional Controls List The State Institutional Controls Listing is maintained by IEPA and identifies sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional control. Please note that EDR increased the search distance from the ASTM minimum search distance to one-half mile. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the State Institutional Controls database. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 19 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT Site Remediation Program (SRP) The Site Remediation Program (SRP) list is maintained by IEPA and includes sites that are enrolled in this voluntary clean-up program. Prior to the SRP (1996 -present), this program was identified as the pre -notice site clean-up program (1989-1995). The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the SRP database. Indian Voluntary Cleanup Priority listing (Indian VCP) The Indian VCP database includes a listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian land. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not identified within the Indian VCP database. Brownfields The Office of Site Evaluations Redevelopment Assessment database is maintained by IEPA and identifies the status of all properties within the State in which IEPA's Office of Site Evaluation has conducted municipal Brownfield Redevelopment Assessment. The property and surrounding properties within the 0.5 -mile search distance were not listed within the Brownfields database. 4.3 Additional Federal, State, Tribal, and Local Environmental Record Sources EDR searched additional federal, state, tribal and local environmental record sources for the property. In addition, EDR searched their proprietary databases. The list of records that were searched by EDR can be reviewed in Appendix D. The following is a brief description of databases with sites that were identified in the project area and may be indicative of recognized environmental conditions. RCRA Non-Generator/No Lon er Regulated (NonGen/NLR) RCRA NonGen/NLR facilities do not presently generate hazardous waste. The property was not identified within the RCRA NonGen/NLR database. Five surrounding properties were identified within the 0.5 mile search distance; however, two properties were mapped at distances greater than 700 feet from the property. Based on regulatory status, intervening distance, and presumed hydraulic gradient, those two database listings are not considered recognized environmental conditions to the property. The remaining three properties are described below. Graco Inc., addressed as 1000 Business Center Drive, previously generated spent halogenated solvents used in degreasing and spent non -halogenated solvents; however, quantity or dates of generation were not reported. The IEPA was notified of the Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 20 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT NonGen/NLR status on October 15, 1984. Violations associated with the former or current RCRA statuses were not identified. The property was mapped east adjoining to the property. Based on regulatory status and lack of violations, the property is not considered a recognized environmental condition to the property. Mt. Prospect Mail Pharmacy, addressed as 800 Biermann Court, was previously classified as an SQG in 2002 and an LQG in 2012, generating ignitable waste, corrosive waste, chromium, selenium, etc. The IEPA was notified of the NonGen/NLR status on May 10, 2013. Violations associated with the former or current RCRA statuses were not identified. The property was mapped west adjoining to the property. Based on the regulatory status and lack of violations, the property is not considered a recognized environmental condition to the property. Mitsubishi CNC, addressed as 800 Business Center Drive, was previously classified as an LQG of ignitable and corrosive wastes in 1989. The IEPA was notified of the NonGen/NLR status on November 1, 2007. Violations associated with the former or current RCRA statuses were not identified. The property was mapped approximately 150 feet southwest of the property. Based on regulatory status, lack of violations, and intervening distance, the property is not considered a recognized environmental condition to the property. Facility Index System (FINDS) The FINDS contains both facility information and "pointers" to other sources that contain more detail. The property was identified within the FINDS database under the entity Amada Engineering, addressed as 799 Biermann Court. The property is also listed on the ACES and BOL databases, which may be related to inspections. Violations were not identified. The FINDS listing for the property is not considered a recognized environmental condition. SPILLS A listing of incidents reported to the Office of Emergency Response. The property was not identified within the SPILLS database. Mt. Prospect Mail Pharmacy, addressed as 800 Biermann Court, was identified within the SPILLS database for an approximately 150 -gallon release of mineral oil from a transformer due to equipment failure. ComEd reported the release on October 12, 2007 and an estimated 400 -square foot area was covered by the release. The incident is reported as closed. Based on review of aerial photographs, indications of potential electrical transformers are present on the east and south sides of the building, and at a minimum distance of 325 feet from the property boundary. Based on the closed status, time period of the incident and development of the area, as well as the intervening distance from the property, the listing is not considered a recognized environmental condition to the property. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 21 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 4.4 Orphan Site Summary Orphan Sites are properties for which a geographic location cannot be pinpointed because of insufficient information on the address. No Orphan Sites were identified by EDR in the database search. 4.5 Regulatory Agency File and Records Review In accordance with the ASTM Standard, if the property or any of the adjoining properties is identified on one or more of the standard environmental record sources, a regulatory file and records review should be conducted, unless it is the environmental professional's opinion that such a review is not warranted. Neither the property nor any of the adjoining properties are identified on standard environmental record sources with the exception of the west adjoining property located at 800 Biermann Court. Information available from IEMA regarding the reported SPILLS incident at this facility was reviewed and incorporated into applicable sections of this ESA. Additional regulatory agency file and records review were deemed unnecessary for this Phase I ESA. 4.6 Historical Use Information True North performed a review of standard historical sources to generate a historical summary of the property and the surrounding area. True North reviewed records for the purpose of documenting the use of the property from the present, back to the property's first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. Standard historical sources, which include aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, property tax files, recorded land title records, USGS topographic maps, local street directories, building department records, zoning/land use records and other historical sources, may be excluded from review if the source is not reasonably ascertainable, or if past experience indicates that the source is not likely to be sufficiently useful, accurate, or complete in terms of defining uses of the property. 4.6.1 Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs reviewed for this Phase I ESA are described below. Year Source 1 Property: The property is improved with a farmstead with frontage along present-day Kensington Road. 1938 EDR Surrounding Areas: The north adjoining property is improved with Kensington Road, beyond which is a farmstead and agricultural land. The east and south adjoining properties consist of agricultural land. The west Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 22 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT adjoining property consists of agricultural land and a farmstead. over. 1972 EDR The on-site farmstead and the farmstead to the west are no longer depicted. The property appears as vacant land. The 1951 EDR north adjoining property appears relatively unchanged from the 1938 photograph. The east, south, and west adjoining properties appear as vacant land with possible roadways. 1955 EDR The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 1951 photograph. 1981 EDR The property, east, south, and west adjoining properties 1962 EDR appear relatively unchanged from the 1955 photograph. A residential neighborhood appears under development north of Kensington Road. The property and surrounding areas appear relatively 1988 EDR unchanged from the 1962 photograph, with the exception 1967 EDR that the residential neighborhood appears to be completed. Some of the surrounding roadways appear to have vegetated over. 1972 EDR The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 1967 photograph. 1974 EDR The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 1972 photograph. The property is improved with the existing light industrial structure. The north adjoining property appears relatively unchanged from the 1974 photograph. The east adjoining 1981 EDR property appears as unimproved, graded land. The south adjoining property is improved with the existing light industrial structure. Biermann Court is developed west of the property, beyond which is a large industrial structure. The property and surrounding areas appear relatively 1988 EDR unchanged from the 1981 photograph, with the exception that the east and southwest properties are now improved with the existing light industrial structures. 1993 EDR The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 1988 photograph. 1998 EDR The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 1993 photograph. The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 1998 photograph, with the exception of 2006 EDR an additional parking lot depicted at the west adjoining 2009 EDR The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 2006 photograph. 2012 EDR The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 2009 photograph. The property and surrounding areas appear relatively unchanged from the 2012 photograph, with the exception 2015 EDR that the western portion of the west adjoining light industrial structure has been demolished and redeveloped into a parking lot. 4.6.2 Fire Insurance Maps EDR conducted a search for historical fire insurance maps for the property and Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 23 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT surrounding area. According to EDR, the property was not identified on any of the maps searched by EDR. A copy of the "No Coverage" notification is included in the appendices. 4.6.3 Property Tax Files True North obtained tax files for the property on the Cook County Assessor's online database. The available records indicate that Gemstone Mount Prospect is the current property owner. 4.6.4 Recorded Land Title Records Recorded land title records were not provided by the user. An independent review of land title information was not conducted by True North. 4.6.5 USGS Topographic Maps The following is a description of available USGS topographic maps reviewed by True North. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 24 The map depicts topographic relief sloping towards the east. Highwood, Illinois 15- The property and surrounding areas appear undeveloped. 1900 Minute Map present-day Kensington Road is depicted to the north of the property and possible residential structures are depicted to the west of the property. The map now depicts topographic relief sloping towards the Arlington Heights, Illinois southeast. A possible residential structure is depicted in the 1927 7.5 -Minute Map western portion of the property. The surrounding areas appear unchanged from the 1900 map. 1946 Arlington Heights, Illinois No significant changes from the 1927 map have been 7.5 -Minute Map identified. Arlington Heights, Illinois No significant changes from the 1946 map have been 1953 7.5 -Minute Map identified, with the exception of roadways constructed to the east, south, and west of the property. Arlington Heights, Illinois The residential structures on the property and to the west of 1963 the property are no longer depicted. The north adjoining 7.5 -Minute Map property is shaded red to depict dense urban development. 1972 Arlington Heights, Illinois No significant changes from the 1963 map have been 7.5 -Minute Map identified. 1980 Arlington Heights, Illinois No significant changes from the 1972 map have been 7.5 -Minute Map identified. The property is improved with the existing commercial structure. The north adjoining property appears unchanged Arlington Heights, Illinois from the 1980 photograph. The east, south, and west adjoining 1993 7.5 -Minute Map properties are improved with the existing structures. Biermann Court and a small pond are depicted to the west of the property. 1995 Arlington Heights, Illinois No significant changes from the 1993 map have been 7.5 -Minute Map identified. 2012 Arlington Heights, Illinois The map does not depict structures or shading. 7.5 -Minute Map Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 24 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 4.6.6 Local Street Directories EDR conducted a search for local street directories for the property and surrounding area. The following in a brief summary of the local street directory information provided by EDR. A copy of EDR's abstract report is included in the appendices. Alemite Corp., Patterson Dental Company, Stewart -Warner 1992 f EDR Digital Archive 1995 Stewart -Warner EDR Digital Archive 2000 Advocate Health & Hospitals, Amada Engineering & Service EDR Digital Archive 2005 Advocate Health & Hospitals, Amada America Inc. EDR Digital Archive 2010 Lutheran General Printing Services EDR Digital Archive 2014 Advocate Print Shop, Lutheran General Printing Services EDR Digital Archive A review of the surrounding properties indicated that the surrounding properties have a recent history of commercial/industrial operation. The east adjoining property, addressed as 1000 East Business Center Drive, was occupied by Output Technologies of ILL from 1992 to 2000; and, Capital Group Partners Inc. from 2000 to 2014. The south adjoining property, addressed as 900 East Business Center Drive, was occupied by Mitsubishi Electronics America in 1987. The west adjoining property, addressed as 800 Biermann Court, was occupied by Mitsubishi Electronic Sales America in 1987; Bigston Corp. USA and Mitsubishi Electronics America from 1992 to 1995; Bigston Corp. USA in 2000; Authentic Brands, Bigston Corp., Caremark RX, and Gidi Holdings LLC in 2005; and, Caremark IL Specialty Pharmacy, Caremark RX, and Gidi Holdings LLC from 2010 to 2014. 4.6.7 Building Department Records True North requested building department records from the Village of Mount Prospect. Building department records were available for review at the Village Hall in Mount Prospect, Illinois. True North reviewed available records for the property, which included the following: • Interior remodel permits for Mitsubishi from 1982; • Electrical permits for Mitsubishi from 1982; • Sign permits for Mitsubishi from 1985; • Sign permits for Patterson Dental Company from 1989; • Sign permits for a vacant/for lease building from 1989; • Transformer installation permits for ComEd from 1990; • Sign permits for NutraSweet from 1990; Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 25 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT • Interior demolition permits from 2001; • Interior remodeling permits from 2001 (Amada America Inc.); • Certificate of Occupancy for Amada Amerimar Inc., dated July 26, 2001; • Electrical permits from 2001; • Interior remodel permits for Manulife Financial from 2006; • Certificate of Occupancy for Manulife Financial, dated July 19, 2006; • Sign permits for Manulife Financial from 2008; • Drainage installation permits for the parking lot from 2009; • Sign permits for CNC Graphics Ltd. from 2011; and, • Certificate of Occupancy for Advocate Health Care Printing, dated August 9, 2011. Based on review of the available records, indications of recognized environmental conditions were not identified at the property. The records are available at the Village Hall. 4.6.8 Zoning/Land Use Records According to the Village of Mount Prospect Office Zoning Map, the property is currently zoned as I1— Limited Industrial. No historic zoning records were available for review. 4.6.9 Other Historical Sources With the exception of interviews included in Section 6.6, no other historical sources such as historical societies, newspaper archives, internet sites, community organizations, miscellaneous maps, previous reports, etc. were reviewed. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 26 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 5.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE A site reconnaissance was performed by Lauren F. Trzaskus and Mr. Sean P. Brady, environmental professionals of True North, to document existing site conditions. The site reconnaissance was conducted on March 21, 2018, from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. Weather conditions during site reconnaissance activities were partly sunny with temperatures in the low 60 degree Fahrenheit range. True North was accompanied by Mr. Mark Rysavy, representative for the Village, during the site reconnaissance. Figure 1 illustrates the general location of the property. Figure 2 illustrates the general land use of the property and adjoining properties. The property layout and details are depicted on Figure 3. Photographs of the property and surrounding properties are included in Appendix A. 5.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions True North completed a reconnaissance of the property, boundary areas, and adjoining properties to document property conditions and identify evidence of dumping, storage tanks, electrical equipment, drummed wastes, improper storage of hazardous materials, surface staining, unusual odors and other potential indicators of recognized environmental conditions. The site visit was conducted by walking the perimeter of the property and building on the property, and also by viewing the property from adjacent public thoroughfares. Adjoining properties were viewed from locations on the property or public right-of-ways. Interior portions of the property observed by True North included the offices, kitchen, restrooms, and warehouse portions of the Advocate Health Care Logistics Center and the offices, restrooms, and warehouse portions of the vacant suite. There were no significant limiting conditions encountered during the site visit. 5.2 General Site Setting 5.2.1 Current Use(s) of the Property The property consists of an approximately 5.5 -acre parcel of land identified by the parcel number 03-35-104-006. The property is currently developed with an approximate 103,126 -square foot, single -story office/warehouse building and associated asphalt paved parking. The remainder of the property includes landscaped areas. The property is currently occupied by Advocate Health Care Logistics Center for pamphlet printing and logistic support operations. The remainder of the building is currently vacant. The current site conditions date back to 2011. The Village is proposing to purchase the property for renovation and future police station use. Topography at the property and surrounding area generally slopes to the southeast, toward the Feehanville Ditch. Current property improvements, based on observations during the site reconnaissance, Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 27 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT interviews and records review, are described below. Sitg Improve �•s Structures The property is improved with an approximate 103,000 -square foot, single -story precast concrete and steel frame building with a slab -on -grade foundation. Public Roads The property has frontage along Biermann Court to the southwest. Access/Egress The property is accessed from Biermann Court via Business Center Drive to the south. Private Roads Paved asphalt driveways and parking areas are located on the south and southwest and Parking portions of the property. Sewage Disposal A municipal sanitary sewage system services domestic waste generated at the System property. Potable Water Potable water is supplied through a municipal water system. Supply Site Utilities Natural gas and electrical utilities are provided to the property. 5.2.2 Past Use(s) of the Property The following is a general overview of the past uses of the property based on the review of standard historical sources, the site reconnaissance, interviews, and records review. 1951- Vacant land Topographic maps, None. 1980 aerial photographs The existing office/warehouse 1981- Topographic maps, building was constructed in 1981. present Office/warehouse building aerial photographs The property has been occupied by various businesses since its construction. No indications of recognized environmental conditions were identified in connection with past uses of the property. A historical Phase I ESA identified the former presence of a natural gas system present within the area which covered approximately 360 acres from the 1940s to the 1980s and has since been dismantled. This finding is discussed further in Section 7.2. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 28 Data failure unlikely to impair No reasonably ability to identify recognized Prior to Unknown, presumed ascertainable environmental conditions. A 1900 undeveloped topographic map was available from sources 1900; however, the land use of the property could not be inferred. 1927- Farmstead Topographic maps, A farmstead was constructed on-site 1946 aerials photographs by 1927. 1951- Vacant land Topographic maps, None. 1980 aerial photographs The existing office/warehouse 1981- Topographic maps, building was constructed in 1981. present Office/warehouse building aerial photographs The property has been occupied by various businesses since its construction. No indications of recognized environmental conditions were identified in connection with past uses of the property. A historical Phase I ESA identified the former presence of a natural gas system present within the area which covered approximately 360 acres from the 1940s to the 1980s and has since been dismantled. This finding is discussed further in Section 7.2. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 28 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 5.2.3 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties and Surrounding Area The current uses of adjoining properties are described below. Direction Land Use North Kensington Road, beyond which is a residential neighborhood. East Sam's Beauty Warehouse. South Blade Room and vacant office suites. West Biermann Court and CVS Specialty Pharmacy. The surrounding area can be generally characterized as commercial and light industrial. No indications of recognized environmental conditions were identified in connection with current uses of adjoining properties or the surrounding area. 5.2.4 Past Uses of the Adjoining Properties and Surrounding Area To the extent that information was revealed during the review of standard historical sources, the site reconnaissance, interviews, and records review, the following is a general overview of the past uses of the adjoining properties and surrounding area. The north adjoining property was developed with Kensington Road, beyond which was undeveloped/agricultural land from at least 1900 through 1938 when a farmstead was North depicted north of Kensington Road. Between 1962 and 1967, the north adjoining property was developed with the existing residential neighborhood and has remained relativelv unchaneed since that time. The east adjoining property appeared undeveloped/agricultural land from at least 1900 through 1951 when possible roadways intended for residential development appeared. East By 1981, the east adjoining property was graded, and the existing light industrial structure was built by 1988. The east adjoining property has remained in similar configuration since that time. The south adjoining property appeared as undeveloped/agricultural land from at least South 1900 through 1951 when possible roadways intended for residential development appeared. The existing light industrial structure was built by 1981 and the south adjoining property has remained relatively unchanged since that time. The west adjoining property appeared as undeveloped/agricultural land with a farmstead from at least 1900 through the early 1950s when the farmstead was demolished. Possible roadways intended for residential development appeared by 1951. West Biermann Court was developed west of the property by 1981, beyond which was a large light industrial structure. A portion of the structure was demolished and redeveloped into a parking lot by 2015. The west adjoining property has remained in similar configuration since that time. Based on the review of historical sources, no potential indications of recognized Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 29 NENVIRONMENT: INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT environmental conditions were identified in connection with the past uses adjoining properties and the surrounding area. A historical Phase I ESA identified the former presence of a natural gas system present within the area which covered approximately 360 acres from the 1940s to the 1980s and has since been dismantled. This finding is discussed further in Section 7.2. 5.3 Exterior Observations True North observed exterior areas of the property for environmental conditions (past or present) that may be indicative of recognized environmental conditions. If a condition was observed or identified through interviews or records review, a detailed explanation of the condition and possible impact on the property is also discussed. The following list summarizes the findings from the site visit. Observed/ Identified Not Observed/ Identified 0 Environmental Condition Hazardous substances and petroleum products in connection with identified uses 0 Storage tanks 0 Odors 0 Pools of liquid 0 Drums 0 Hazardous substance and petroleum product containers (not in connection with identified uses 0 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0 Pits, ponds, or lagoons 0 Stained soil or pavement 0 Stressed vegetation 0 Solid Waste Wastewater (including stormwater) discharges (drains, ditches, under round injections stems) 0 Wells (including dry wells, irrigation wells, injection wells, abandoned wells, or other wells 0 Septic Systems 0 Other Environmental Conditions Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products in Connection with Identified Uses No indications of hazardous substances and petroleum products in connection with identified uses on exterior portions of the property were observed or identified through interviews or records review. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 30 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT Storage Tanks No indications of storage tanks on exterior portions of the property were observed or identified through interviews or records review. Odors No odors were observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Pools of Liquid No pools of liquid were observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Drums No drums were observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Unidentified Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Product Containers No unidentified hazardous substance or petroleum product containers (not necessarily in connection with identified uses) were observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Common sources of PCBs are transformers, electrical equipment and lifts that use PCB - containing dielectric fluids, hydraulic fluids, transfer fluids and lubricants. Fluorescent light ballasts manufactured before 1979 may include capacitors, which contain up to 1.5 ounces of PCB oil; however, the presence of fluorescent light ballasts need not be noted in a Phase I ESA per the ASTM standard. One pad -mounted transformer was observed on the east exterior side of the building, one pad -mounted transformer was observed on the south exterior side of the building, and two pad -mounted transformers were observed on the west exterior side of the building. Labeling identified the east transformer as "non -PCB" while the south and two west transformers were not labeled. The age of the transformers is unknown but presumed to be the approximate age of the structure and surrounding development. No indications of releases were observed. Based on observations, the transformers are not indicative of recognized environmental conditions. Pits, Ponds or La oons No pits, ponds or lagoons were observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Stained Soil or Pavement No stained soil or pavement was observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 31 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT Stressed Vegetation No stressed vegetation (from something other than insufficient water) was observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Solid Waste No indications of on-site solid waste disposal, including areas that are apparently filled or graded by non -natural causes (or filled by fill of unknown origin) were observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Wastewater Stormwater catch basins were observed within the asphalt paved parking lots on the south and west sides of the building. Stormwater drainage culverts were observed along the northern boundary of the property. The catch basins and culverts are presumed to discharge to the municipal stormwater system. Evidence of staining, releases, or odors within the vicinity were not observed. The catch basins and culverts are not considered recognized environmental conditions to the property. Wells No indications of wells (including dry wells, irrigation wells, injection wells, abandoned wells, or other wells) were observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Septic Systems No indication of on-site septic systems or cesspools were observed on exterior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. 5.4 Interior Observations True North observed accessible interior areas of the property for environmental conditions (past or present) that may be indicative of recognized environmental conditions. If a condition was observed or identified through interviews or records review, a detailed explanation of the condition and possible impact on the property is also discussed. The following list summarizes the findings from the site visit. Hazardous substances and petroleum products in connection with identified uses 0 1 Storage tanks 0 1 Odors 0 1 Pools of liquid Drums Hazardous substance and petroleum product containers (not in connection with identified uses) Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 32 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 0 1 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0 1 1 Heating/Cooling Equipment, Including Fuel Source Stains or Corrosion on Floors, Walls, Ceilings (except staining from water) 0 1 1 Drains and Sumps • 1 1 Other Environmental Conditions Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products in Connection with Identified Uses Retail -sized containers of paint, inks, and toners were observed on a shelving unit within the Advocate warehouse space. The containers were observed in a neat and organized fashion. Retail -sized containers of paint and primer were observed in an equipment room of the Advocate warehouse. The containers were observed on the concrete floor in an orderly fashion. Evidence of staining or releases within the vicinity of the containers was not observed and the concrete slab was in good condition. Based on visual observations, the containers are not indicative of recognized environmental conditions to the property. Storage Tanks No indications of storage tanks within interior portions of the property were observed or identified through interviews or records review. Odors No odors were observed within interior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Pools of Liquid No pools of liquid were observed within interior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Drums Two plastic 55 -gallon containers and a 55 -gallon steel drum were observed in the Advocate warehouse. The plastic containers were labeled as "hazardous waste" and the steel drum was not labeled. According to Advocate personnel, the containers and drum contain spent developer and/or toner from printer/copier support operations. The containers and drum are serviced by a contracted disposal company. One plastic container was full during the site reconnaissance while the second was approximately V2 full. An approximate 1 -square foot area of stained flooring beneath one of the plastic containers was observed; however, evidence of floor drains within the vicinity were not observed. Based on visual observations, the plastic containers and drum are not considered recognized environmental conditions to the property. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 33 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT Unidentified Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Product Containers No unidentified hazardous substance or petroleum product containers (not necessarily in connection with identified uses) were observed within interior portions of the property or identified through interviews or records review. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Common sources of PCBs are transformers, electrical equipment and lifts that use PCB - containing dielectric fluids, hydraulic fluids, transfer fluids and lubricants. Fluorescent light ballasts manufactured before 1979 may include capacitors, which contain up to 1.5 ounces of PCB oil; however, the presence of fluorescent light ballasts need not be noted in a Phase I ESA per the ASTM standard. A portable air compressor was observed in the Advocate warehouse. The air compressor was not in use during the site reconnaissance. Evidence of staining or releases within the vicinity of the air compressor was not observed. The air compressor is not indicative of a recognized environmental condition to the property. Several dry -type transformers were observed throughout the warehouse spaces of the building. Dry -type transformers do not require mineral oil typical for operation. The dry -type transformer operations are not indicative of recognized environmental conditions to the property. Heating and CoolingEEguipment The office portions of the property are heated and cooled via roof -mounted, forced air HVAC units. The warehouse and loading dock areas are heated via ceiling -mounted heating units. Condensers were observed on the south exterior wall of the building. Air handlers were observed within the warehouse portions. A pad -mounted air conditioning unit was observed on the west exterior wall of the Advocate suite, which cools the office space. Evidence of staining or releases within the vicinity of the aforementioned equipment was not observed. The heating and cooling equipment is not considered a recognized environmental condition to the property. Stains or Corrosion An approximate 1 -square foot area of stained flooring was observed beneath one of the 55 -gallon plastic containers in the Advocate warehouse. The stain appeared to be from filling the container and did not appear to be recent. Evidence of floor drains within the vicinity were not observed and the concrete slab was in good condition. Based on the limited nature and competent concrete flooring, the stain is not considered a recognized environmental condition. Drains and Sumps Floor drains were observed in the restrooms, loading docks, and throughout the warehouse portions of the building. The drains are presumed to discharge to the municipal sanitary sewer system. Evidence of staining, releases, or odors within the vicinity of the drains were not observed. The drains are not indicative of recognized environmental conditions to the property. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 34 NENVIRONMENT: INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT A sump was observed in the loading dock of the vacant suite. The sump is presumed to discharge to the exterior of the building in the event that the loading dock floods. Evidence of staining, releases, or odors within the vicinity of the sump was not observed. The sump is not indicative of a recognized environmental condition to the property. Other Environmental Conditions Five spring-loaded dock levelers were observed in the building. Two dock levelers were observed in the Advocate warehouse and three dock levelers were observed in the vacant suite warehouse. Evidence of staining or releases within the vicinity of the dock levelers was not observed. The dock levelers are not indicative of recognized environmental conditions to the property. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 35 Y ENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 6.0 INTERVIEWS True North interviewed the following individuals/entities in an effort to obtain information regarding the property and adjoining properties that may identify recognized environmental conditions. Interviews may be conducted in person, by telephone, or in writing. Copies of records of communications are included in Appendix E. 6.1 Current Owner Interview True North interviewed the property broker and Mr. Dennis Zider during the site visit. True North provided Mr. Adam Kelderman with an interview questionnaire which was completed after the site visit. According to the interview, Gemstone Mt. Prospect Industrial, LLC acquired the property in 2011. Advocate occupies a portion of the property for printing, packaging, storage, and equipment repairs. Mr. Kelderman was not aware of any spills, releases or other conditions at the property that are indicative of recognized environmental conditions. Mr. Kelderman was forthcoming with information during the interview. The property owner identified the key site manager as Dennis Zider with Advocate. The interview with Mr. Zider is detailed below. 6.2 Key Site Manager Interview The property owner is also the key site manager. Therefore, no additional interviews were conducted. 6.3 Current Occupant Interview(s) The property is occupied by Advocate. As such, interviews with the current occupant and property broker were conducted during the site reconnaissance. 6.4 Past Owners, Operators, and Occupants Contact information for previous owners, operators and occupants at the property was not provided. Information to be provided by past owners, operators, and occupants is likely duplicative of information already obtained from other sources. No past owners, operators, or occupants were interviewed. 6.5 Local Government Official Interview(s) As part of the Phase I ESA, True North interviewed local government officials in person, in writing, or by telephone. Interviews with local government officials are described below. Building Department As discussed in Section 4.6.7, True North has received written correspondence from the Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 36 NENVIRONMENT: INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT Village of Mount Prospect. 6.6 Other Pertinent Interviews True North did not interview any other pertinent resources during the course of this ESA. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 37 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 7.0 EVALUATION 7.1 Findings Based on the research conducted by True North as part of the ESA, no evidence of known or suspect recognized environmental conditions, historical recognized environmental conditions, or de minimis conditions were identified with the exception of the following: A historical Phase I ESA noted that the property and 340 -acres of the surrounding area had been historically utilized as a natural gas reservoir system facility between 1940 through 1980 by North Shore Gas. 7.2 Opinions No evidence of recognized environmental conditions, historical recognized environmental conditions, or de minimis conditions were identified by True North during this Phase I ESA with the exception of the following: A historical Phase I ESA noted that the property and 340 -acres of the surrounding area had been historically utilized as a natural gas reservoir system facility between 1940 through 1980 by North Shore Gas. The system was reportedly dismantled upon termination of use. Based on a review of reasonably ascertainable information and the reported dismantlement of the former natural gas system, the historical North Shore Gas natural gas system does not represent a recognized environmental condition. 7.3 Conclusions True North has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 of 799 Biermann Court in Mount Prospect, Illinois, the property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Sections 2.7 and 7.6 of this report. The assumptions and limitations considered by True North during the course of this Phase I ESA, in addition to those identified within E1527-13, are described in Sections 2.5 and 2.6, respectively. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions. 7.4 Additional Investigation Based on the findings of this Phase I ESA, no additional investigation or inquiry into recognized environmental conditions is recommended by True North. 7.5 Data Gaps and Limiting Conditions No significant data gaps were encountered during preparation of this Phase I ESA. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 38 NENVIRONMENT: INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT 7.6 Deletions No deletions from the proposed scope of work were noted during preparation of this report. 7.7 Signatures and Environmental Professional Statement We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312 of 40 CFR Part 312, and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquires in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR 312. Z Ii ,O / / / Lauren F. Trzaskus Associate Project Manager Sean P. Brady, P.E. Project Manager Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 39 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 8.0 ADDITIONAL (NON -SCOPE) SERVICES Non -scope considerations are environmental conditions in connection with the property that are outside the scope of the Phase I ESA practice. If specifically requested by the Village, evaluation of non -scope considerations are described below. 8.1 Asbestos -Containing Building Materials A "Limited ACM Assessment" report dated May 26, 2011 was prepared for the property by Hygieneering, Inc. The limited survey report, which reported the evaluation of six homogeneous materials, did not identify any asbestos containing materials. During the Phase I ESA site reconnaissance True North conducted a limited visual asbestos survey to identify suspect ACM at the property. It should be noted that physical sampling of materials was not conducted during the True North survey which was limited to visual observations. Based on the year of construction of the on-site structures (1981), asbestos may be present in suspect ACM identified at the property. Suspect ACM identified during the limited visual survey include, but may not necessarily be limited to, the following: • Drywall • Ceiling tiles • Carpet mastic • Baseboard mastic • Ceramic tiles and associated adhesive • Various floor tiles and associated mastic • Vibration dampers • Residual mastic on concrete flooring Several of the noted materials appear consistent with those sampled previously as identified in the Hygieneering report. However, there were some additional materials, including various mastics, flooring materials and vibration dampers, which did not appear to have been previously sampled. It should be noted that additional suspect ACM not identified herein could be present within walls, ceiling cavities and other areas that were not accessible or accessed during the site visit. The suspect ACM noted above were observed in good condition at the time of the site visit and are therefore not considered an immediate environmental concern. However, in the event of damage, renovation, or demolition, a supplemental asbestos survey should be performed to evaluate suspect ACM to determine asbestos content and appropriate handling/disposal methods. 8.2 Floodplains A review for floodplains was not conducted as part of this assessment. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 40 NENVIRONMENT : INFRA5T$tUCTURE : DEVELOPMENT 8.3 Wetlands A review for wetlands was not conducted as part of this assessment. 8.4 Radon A review for area radon levels was not conducted as part of this assessment. 8.5 Lead Based Paint A review for suspect lead-based paint was not conducted as part of this assessment. 8.6 Lead in Drinking Water An evaluation of lead in drinking water was not included in the scope of this assessment. 8.7 Indoor Air Quality An evaluation of indoor air quality, excluding potential impacts to indoor air from releases of hazardous substances into the environment, was not included in the scope of this assessment. In general, EPA does not regulate indoor air quality except to the extent that indoor air impacts are caused by releases of hazardous substances into the subsurface soil or groundwater (vapor intrusion). Vapor migration was considered during the course of this Phase I ESA and has been incorporated into the findings and conclusions per the ASTM 1527-13 standard and AAI regulation. 8.8 Other Considerations No additional environmental issues were considered as part of this assessment. Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 41 NENVIRONMENT: INFRA5T$tUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT 9.0 REFERENCES Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 42 Phase I guidelines ASTM International, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, November 2013 (ASTM1527-13) Environmental Records Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Radius Report, March 9, 2018 Aerial Photographs EDR — Aerial Photo Decade Package, March 9, 2018 Fire Insurance Maps EDR - Sanborn Map Report, March 9, 2018 Property Tax Files Cook County Assessor's website Land Title Records N/A USGS Topographic Maps EDR Historic Topographic Map Report, March 9, 2018 Local Street Directories EDR - City Directory Report, March 14, 2018 Building Department Records Village of Mount Prospect Zoning/Land Use Records Village of Mount Prospect Official Zoning Map, March 2018 Environmental & Activity Land Use Controls Advanced Searches, Environmental Lien Search, March 13, 2018 Geological Information Bedrock Geology of Illinois, 2005, Illinois State Geological Survey Soils Information United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service http://www.soils.usda.gov/ Flood Information N/A Wetland Information N/A Other N/A Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station Phase I ESA > T118149 > April 4, 2018 > Page 42 FIGURES f 17 Noll- a Radio r PkI Pk, TvWe o I • • ,� w _ I i fuel 0 fk Asia ia -� b 1995 ALRINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS — TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ADAPTED FROM USGS APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY A SITE LOCATION PROPOSED MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE STATION FIGURE T R U E N O R T H 799 BIERMANN COURT I C 0 N S U L T A N T S MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056 PROJECT NUMBER 1000 EAST WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 140 T118149 CLIENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60563 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET DATE MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056 NOT ToSCALE MARCH 2018 W. j a G � id p REST T � r M r OFFICE/LIGHT INDU c C-1 dr 2017 — AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ADAPTED FROM GOOGLEMAPS APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY A SITE LOCATION PROPOSED MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE STATION FIGURE T R U E N O R T H 799 BIERMANN COURT 2 C 0 N S U L T A N T S MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 00056 PROJECT NUMBER 1000 EAST WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 140 T118149 CLIENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60563 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET DATE MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056 NOT ToSCALE MARCH 2018 2017 — AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ADAPTED FROM GOOGLEMAPS APPROXIMATE SITE BOUNDARY PAD -MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS FENCED ENCLOSURES A SITE LOCATION PROPOSED MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE STATION FIGURE T R U E N O R T H 799 BIERMANN COURT 3 C 0 N S U L T A N T S MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 00056 PROJECT NUMBER 1000 EAST WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 140 T118149 CLIENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60563 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET DATE MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056 NOT ToSCALE MARCH 2018 MW 1 L , A Site Photographs PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE STATION 799 BIERMANN COURT, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS AI: View from the south side of the property, facing north. 93: View of two representative pad -mounted transformers. A5: View facing east along the northern boundary of the property. 14k. TRUENORTH CONSULTANTS 92: View from the west side of the property, facing south of the parking lot. 94: View within one of the fenced enclosures. 116: View facing south along the eastern boundary of the property. PROJECT NUMBER: TI18149 DATE : MARCH 2018 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE STATION 799 BIERMANN COURT, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 97: View from the southeast corner of the property, facing west. 99: View of the Advocate kitchen. All: View of the Advocate warehouse. TRUENORTH C 0 N 5 V L T A N T 5 AR View of the Advocate suite lobby area. 910: View of the Advocate warehouse. 912: View of the Advocate warehouse. PROJECT NUMBER: T118149 DATE : MARCH 2018 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE STATION 799 BIERMANN COURT, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS I* 913: View of the hazardous materials containers and drum located in the Advocate warehouse. 915: View of the vacant suite office area. #17: View of representative spring-loaded dock levelers. k__ TRUENORTH CONSULTANTS #14: View of the paints, inks, and toners within the Advocate warehouse. 916: View of the vacant suite warehouse area. 918: View of the sump within the loading dock of the vacant suite. PROJECT NUMBER: T118149 DATE : MARCH 2018 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT PROPOSED MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE STATION 799 BIERMANN COURT, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 919: View of the vacant suite warehouse area. 921: View of the north adjoining Kensington Road, beyond which are residential structures. A. TRUENORTH C 0 N 5 V L T A N T 5 A20: View of the west adjoining CVS Specialty Pharmacy. A22: View of the south adjoining Blade Room/vacant suite building. PROJECT NUMBER: T118149 DATE : MARCH 2018 APPENDIX B Qualifications of Environmental Professionals) LAUREN F. TRZASKUS POSITION Associate Project Manager LICENSES/REGISTRATIONS Asbestos Building Inspector - Indiana, Michigan SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE • Over five years of professional experience in private industry and consulting sector work. • Provides experience in asbestos inspections. • Familiar with specifications for soil and groundwater remediation and management projects. • Provides experience in field data acquisition for soil, groundwater, and soil gas investigations. • Offers knowledge of current Clean Construction and Demolition Debris (CCDD) legislation. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS - Ms. Trzaskus has performed numerous Phase I ESAs, Mini Phase I ESAs, and transaction screens within the Midwest. Property types have included residential, light and heavy industrial/manufacturing facilities, commercial buildings, institutional and governmental facilities and agricultural properties. Assessment activities include site reconnaissance, historical data collection and analysis, regulatory database review, and report preparation. Reporting has been prepared in accordance with the latest versions of ASTM 1527, ASTM 1528„ and Federal AAI standards as well as client -specific specifications. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS - Ms. Trzaskus has performed numerous limited Phase II ESAs throughout the Midwest as an assistant project manager and technician. Ms. Trzaskus has played an integral role in the planning, performance, and reporting of subsurface investigations for vacant/idle land, light and heavy industrial/manufacturing, commercial, institutional and governmental facilities and agricultural properties. Soils and groundwater have been assessed using direct push and rotary drill procedures for sampling in conformance with applicable ASTM standards. Activities included in the assessment process include utility clearance, preparation of health and safety plans, geophysical surveys, soil boring advancement, monitoring well installations, chemical screening of soil samples, soil and groundwater sample collection and logging, surveying, and report preparation and submittal. Ms. Trzaskus also has conducted several Phase II ESAs that included soil gas sampling and analysis. STORAGE TANK MANAGEMENT - Ms. Trzaskus has been involved in several phases of underground storage tank management including tank removals, assessment, remediation, and reporting. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE - Ms. Trzaskus has conducted several asbestos surveys within the Midwest. Activities included limited visual observations for asbestos, limited asbestos surveys, and pre -demolition asbestos surveys. EDUCATION B.S. Environmental Geoscience, Northern Illinois University B.S. Geography, Northern Illinois University CERTIFICATIONS 40 -Hour Hazardous Waste Operation & Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Training 8 -Hour Hazardous Water Operation & Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Refresher Training SEAN P. BRADY, P.E. POSITION Project Manager LICENSES/REGISTRATIONS Licensed Professional Engineer - Illinois Licensed Asbestos Inspector—Illinois, Indiana Licensed Asbestos Project Manager, Project Supervisor—Illinois, Indiana Licensed Asbestos Air Sampling Professional—Illinois SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Over 10 years of professional experience in the environmental engineering industry and environmental, health and safety consulting sector. • Provides experience in property assessment and remediation design inclusive of Phase I ESAs, Phase II ESAs, and remediation of contaminated sites. • Experience with specifications, regulations, design and execution of soil and groundwater remediation and management projects. • Offers experience in Brownfield Redevelopment including investigation and remediation of impacted properties. • Demonstrated experience performing IDOT special waste/plans, soil analyses and soil management oversight services for contractors. • Provides experience in field data acquisition and analysis for soil and groundwater investigations. • Experienced in the application of a wide variety of monitoring and analytical methods required for the detection and evaluation of human exposure to environmental contaminants, and the engineering and control methods used to mitigate hazardous conditions. Provides experience in asbestos management including inspection, planning, and abatement oversight. • Offers industrial hygiene and indoor air quality investigation experience entailing the recognition, evaluation, and control of those factors which may cause sickness, impaired health conditions, or significant discomfort to human health. • Provides experience in asbestos management and abatement inclusive of project management, inspection, and abatement oversight. • Additional experience includes underground storage tank operations as well as leaking underground storage tank management and consulting. RELEVANT EXPERIENCE IDOT REGULATED SUBSTANCES MANAGEMENT - Mr. Brady has performed reporting, sampling and oversight on over 30 IDOT right-of-ways (ROWS) projects throughout District 1 to ensure compliance with IDOT 669 Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction Projects. These services we performed on behalf of the contractors and specifically included development of special waste plans and reports (Site Contamination Operation Plan, Site Health and Safety Plan, Site Contamination Erosion Control Plan and Final Construction Reports); waste disposal analyses sampling, and PID oversight screening during regulated substance removal Additional services included delineation sampling of PSI results which involved utility clearance, soil boring advancement, physical soil screening with PID, soil sample collection and logging, and report preparation and submittal. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS – Mr. Brady has performed over 200 Phase I ESAs and transaction screens in Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, Tennessee, New York, Georgia, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Missouri. Property types have included residential, light and heavy industrial/manufacturing facilities, commercial buildings, institutional and agricultural properties. Assessment activities include site reconnaissance, historical data collection and analysis, regulatory database review, and report preparation. Reporting has been prepared in accordance with the latest versions of ASTM 1527, ASTM 1528, ASTM E2247 and Federal AAI standards as well as client -specific specifications. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS - Various Projects—Mr. Brady has performed numerous Phase II ESAs in Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, and Tennessee as a project engineer and project manager. Mr. Brady has played an integral role in the planning, performance, and reporting of subsurface investigations for light industrial/manufacturing, and commercial properties. Soil and groundwater have been assessed using direct push, rotary drill, and test pitting procedures for sampling according to applicable ASTM standards. Activities in the assessment process included utility clearance, preparation of health and safety plans, geophysical surveys, soil boring advancement, groundwater monitoring well installations, chemical screening of soil samples, soil and groundwater sample collection, and report preparation and submittal. SOIL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTING – Mr. Brady has performed over 95 limited soil assessments of commercial, industrial, residential, vacant properties and right-of-ways (ROWS) throughout Illinois to determine compliance with Illinois Law governing soil management and disposal. Activities included in the assessment process include historical and regulatory records review, utility clearance, soil boring advancement, physical soil screening with PID, soil sample collection and logging, developing soil management plans to delineate soils for disposal at a licensed waste facility or Clean Construction and Demolition Debris (CCDD), and report preparation and submittal. REMEDIATION DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - Mr. Brady has over four years of remedial management experience of environmental impacted properties throughout the Chicago land area and Illinois. This experience includes the oversight and coordination of UST permitting, removal, and sampling and reporting services at former gas stations and industrial/commercial properties. Mr. Brady has been involved in the planning and design of remedial efforts inclusive of soil remediation. Remedial efforts have included the remediation of hazardous waste soil impacted with dry cleaning solvents, petroleum and lead impacted soils from leaking USTs, and creation of soil management zones (SMZs) used to maintain contaminated soils on-site. BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS - Mr. Brady has participated in several brownfield redevelopment projects as a project engineer. Responsibilities include assistance in site investigation, general regulatory program liaison, project reporting, and project coordination and management. Mr. Brady has been successful in utilizing the IEPA's Part 742 "Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives" (TACO) to develop cost effective remediation strategies and securing both Focused and Comprehensive No Further Remediation (NFR) letters through the IEPA's Part 740 "Site Remediation Program" (SRP). STORAGE TANK MANAGEMENT – Various Projects - Mr. Brady has been involved in several facets of underground storage tank management including consulting, funding reimbursement, tank removals, assessment, remediation, and reporting. Mr. Brady has played an integral role in the assessment and closure of numerous leaking underground storage tank incidents. ASBESTOS EXPERIENCE - Various Projects - Mr. Brady has served as a project manager, building inspector, and air sampling professional for numerous asbestos projects throughout the Greater Chicagoland area and the Midwest. Projects include K-12 public and private schools, public and commercial buildings, and industrial/manufacturing facilities. As an asbestos project manager, Mr. Brady has provided asbestos abatement oversight for public and commercial facilities, schools and industrial sites. As an asbestos building inspector, Mr. Brady has inspected a variety of buildings including elementary schools, high schools, industrial/manufacturing, residential, and commercial buildings. MOLD & INDOOR AIR QUALITY INVESTIGATION - Mr. Brady has conducted numerous mold investigations for residential, educational, health care and commercial facilities. The scope of investigations included: a preliminary investigation of the subject facility; occupant interviews; mechanical system evaluation; thermal comfort conditions evaluation; water sampling; mold and bacteria sampling; and volatile organic compound sampling. Upon receipt of analytical results, the data was analyzed and a report of findings was submitted to the client with recommendations of corrective actions for identified site conditions. EDUCATION M.S. Environmental Engineering - Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois B.S. Chemistry - University of Illinois, Urbana -Champaign, Illinois CERTIFICATIONS AND TRAINING 40 -Hour Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Training 8 -Hour Hazardous Waste Operations & Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Refresher Training 10 -Hour OSHA Construction Industry Outreach Safety Training National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH)—"Microscopical Identification of Asbestos" (1608A) Accredited National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) 582 Course – "Asbestos Fiber Counting" Accredited APPENDIX C User Provided Documents /\. T R U E N O R T H AAI/Phase I ESA "User" Questionnaire C o IN 5 U L T A IN Y s Adapted from ASTM E 1527-13/AAI Site Name/ID: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Department Site Address: 799 Bierman Court, Mount Prospect, Illinois Tax/Parcel ID: 03-35-104-006 Owner and Contact Information: Gemstone Mount Prospect Industrial, LLC c/o Torburn Partners, Inc. 1033 Skokie Boulevard, suite 480 Northbrook, IL 60062 Property Manager and Contact Information: ❑X Same as owner Site Occupants and Contact Information: ❑ Same as owner Advocate Health ❑ Same as manager 799 Biermann Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Site Visit Contact: Meet purchasing broker Mark Baumhart and Village employee Mark Rysavy on site. 630.329.6299 Reason(s) for Performing Phase I ESA/AAI Due Diligence: X❑ Prospective Purchaser ❑Brownfield Assessment ❑ Prospective Lessee ❑Qualify for one of the landowner lloblllty protections to CERCLA liability protection ❑ Providing Funding/Financing ❑Other ❑ Yes ❑x No Are you the current owner of the property? If Yes, please indicate length of ownership/date of purchase: ❑ Yes ❑X No Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state or local law? /r Yes, please explain: Page I of 4 ❑+ n ,^1 N� cwv.Ru"mc".. .N."^o"""""s.ocvcm,mEm .� �l Yes NO Are you aware of any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the site and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state or local law? (rYes, pleoseexp/o/n. Yes NO Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved |nthe same line ofbusiness acthe current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and Processes used by this type of business? /rYes, pleoseexplom. Aothe Village vveknow there used bobealot ufprinters inthis facility, but they were large self contained xerox type machines as opposed to exposed ink and roller systems from thennyt NN �� Yes NO Does the purchase, lease, assessment or appraisal price reasonably refect the fair market value ofthe property? (rNo, pleoseexplrm Iryouconclude thot there is odirrerence,hove you considered whether the lower purchoseprice /s becouseconto/nmot/on/sknown orbelieved tobe present ot the property? M Yes �� No Are you aware ofcommonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the Property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative oYreleases orthreatened releases? /rYes, pleoseexplom. FXJ Yes M NO Doyou know the past uses ofthe property? /rYes, pA*oseexplom. Again, this used to be a printing facility, but it was self contained machines as opposed to exposed ink and rollers. M Yes �� NO Doyou know ofspecific chemicals that are present oronce were present at the property? /rYes, pA*oseexplom. Page 2o[4 NENVIRONMENT: INFRASTRUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT ❑ Yes X❑ No Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at or impacted the property? /r Yes, please explain: ❑ Yes X❑ No Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at or impacted the property? /r Yes, please explain: ❑ Yes ❑X No Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? /r Yes, please explain: Please indicate if any of the following documents listed below exist and can be provided to True North: ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes NX No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes X❑ No Environmental site assessment reports Site plans or survey Title records Environmental compliance audit reports Environmental permits (for example, solid waste disposal permits, hazardous waste disposal permits, wastewater permits, NPDES permits, underground injection permits) Registrations for underground and above -ground storage tanks Material safety data sheets Community right -to -know plan Safety plans, preparedness and prevention plans, spill prevention, countermeasure and control plans, facility response plans, etc. Reports regarding hydrogeologic conditions on the property or surrounding area Notices or other correspondence from any government agency relating to past or current violations of environmental laws with respect to the property or relating to environmental liens encumbering the property Hazardous waste generator notices or reports Geotechnical studies Risk assessments Recorded Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) Page 3 of 4 1^1 NENVIRONMENT: INFRASTRUCTURE: DEVELOPMENT MX Yes ❑ No Do you have any other previously prepared documents for the property that may include information regarding the environmental status or past uses of the property? /r Yes, please identify below and provide copies to True Nol-th. Emailed to Brian Mihelich already User Information'. Signature'. Printed Name/Title- Mark Rysavy Company- Village of Mount Prospect Address. 50 S. Emerson Street Phone- 630.329.6299 Please Return Form to True North Consultants, Inc. IL Headquarters'. 1000 East WaFFenville Road/ Suite 140 NapeFVille/ Illinois 60563 Fax: (630) 689-5881 WI Office'. 525 Junction Road/ Suite 1900 Madison/ Wisconsin 53717 Fax: (608) 237-2453 Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX D Radius Map Report Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Inquiry Number: 5213454.2s March 09, 2018 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 CEDR ",. www.edrnet.com FORM -LBC -JUS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary------------------------------------------------------- ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary---------------------------------------------------- 4 Map Findings 8 OrphanSummary--------------------------------------------------------- 49 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR -1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------ A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary-------------------------------------------. A-2 Physical Setting Source Map A-9 Physical Setting Source Map Findings---------------------------------------- A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------. PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC5213454.2s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 799 BIERMAN COURT MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 42.0796800 - 42° 4'46.84" 87.9216390 - 87° 55' 17.90" Zone 16 423764.9 4658820.5 656 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 5681632 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 2012 Portions of Photo from: 20150822 Source: USDA TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 799 BIERMAN COURT MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION Al AMADA ENGINEERING 799 BIERMAN CT FINDS TP A2 AMADA ENGINEERING 799 BIERMAN CT IL BOL TP B3 MT PROSPECT MAIL PHA 800 BIERMAN RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO Higher 132, 0.025, WSW B4 800 BIERMANN IL AST, IL SPILLS Higher 132, 0.025, WSW B5 MT PROSPECT SPECIALT 800 BIERMANN CT STE RCRA-CESQG Higher 132, 0.025, WSW 6 GRACO INC 1000 BUSINESS CENTER RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 308, 0.058, ESE 7 HEIDELBERG USA INC 625 SLAWIN CT RCRA-CESQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 492, 0.093, SE C8 MITSUBISHI CNC 800 EAST BUSINESS CE RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO Higher 619, 0.117, SSW C9 CORELINK DATA CENTER 800 EAST BUSINESS CE IL AST Higher 619, 0.117, SSW C10 CORELINK DATA CENTER 800 EAST BUSINESS CE IL AST Higher 619, 0.117, SSW 11 C -LINE PRODUCTS INC 1100 E BUSINESS CTR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 714, 0.135, ESE C12 XYTEL CORP 801 BUSINESS CENTER RCRA NonGen / NLR, MLTS, FINDS, ECHO Higher 796, 0.151, SSW D13 G D SEARLE & CO 699 N WHEELING RD, S IL UST Higher 815, 0.154, WSW D14 FISHER CLINICAL SVCS 699 N WHEELING RD RCRA-CESQG Higher 815, 0.154, WSW 15 SEARLE 700 E BUSINESS CENTE MN MANIFEST Higher 816, 0.155, SW 16 STEWART WARNER CORP 580 SLAWIN CT RCRA-CESQG Lower 905, 0.171, SSE D17 SEARLE & CO 699 N WHEELING RD MN MANIFEST Higher 1066, 0.202, WSW 18 GESTETNER CORP 851 FEEHANVILLE DR RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 1133, 0.215, SSW 19 AMADA ENGINEERING 570 N WHEELING RD RCRA-SQG Higher 1172, 0.222, SW 20 E DOC 555 BUSINESS CENTER RCRA-CESQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1269, 0.240, SW 21 NORTHFIELD LABS 1200 BUSINESS CTR DR RCRA-SQG, IL AIRS Lower 1282, 0.243, East 22 MINISTRY CTR 1400 KENSINGTON RD IL LUST. IL UST Lower 2167. 0.410. ENE 5213454.2s Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: Site Database(s) EPA ID AMADA ENGINEERING FINDS N/A 799 BIERMAN CT Registry ID:: 110018253593 MOUNT PROSPECT. IL 60056 AMADA ENGINEERING IL BOL N/A 799 BIERMAN CT Site Id: 170000466216 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Inv Num: 0311985139 DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL___________________________ National Priority List Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS -ARCHIVE -------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS_________ Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS IL SSU________________________ State Sites Unit Listing State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists IL SWF/LF____________________ Available Disposal for Solid Waste in Illinois - Solid Waste Landfills Subject to State Surcharge IL CCDD______________________ Clean Construction or Demolition Debris IL LF SPECIAL WASTE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Special Waste Site List IL NIPC_______________________ Solid Waste Landfill Inventory State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land IL LUST TRUST --------------- Underground Storage Tank Fund Payment Priority List State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries IL ENG CONTROLS__________ Sites with Engineering Controls IL INST CONTROL ------------ Institutional Controls State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites IL SRP________________________ Site Remediation Program Database INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites IL BROWNFIELDS____________ Municipal Brownfields Redevelopment Grant Program Project Descriptions ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODI___________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9----------- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI___________________________ Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register IL CDL________________________ Meth Drug Lab Site Listing US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS________________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System IL SPILLS 90__________________ SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS_________________________ Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD__________________________ Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______ State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR_______________ Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST____________ EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION----------- 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA_________________________ Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS__________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS-------------------------- Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD__________________________ Records Of Decision RMP__________________________ Risk Management Plans RAATS________________________ RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP___________________________ Potentially Responsible Parties PADS_________________________ PCB Activity Database System ICIS___________________________ Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS__________________________ FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) COAL ASH DOE-------------- Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA______________ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER-------- PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO --------------------- Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS____________________ FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS_____________________ Incident and Accident Data CONSENT____________________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV_____________ Indian Reservations FUSRAP______________________ Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA_______________________ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS____________ Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS______________________ Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES____________________ Mines Master Index File TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ABANDONED MINES --------- Abandoned Mines DOCKET HWC---------------- Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO --------------------------- Unexploded Ordnance Sites FUELS PROGRAM___________ EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing IL CHICAGO ENV ------------- Environmental Records Dataset IL COAL ASH_________________ Coal Ash Site Listing IL DRYCLEANERS___________ Illinois Licensed Drycleaners IL Financial Assurance________ Financial Assurance Information Listing IL HWAR______________________ Hazard Waste Annual Report IL IMPDMENT----------------- Surface Impoundment Inventory IL NPDES_____________________ A Listing of Active Permits IL PIMW ----------------------- Potentially Infectious Medical Waste IL TIER 2______________________ Tier 2 Information Listing IL UIC_________________________ Underground Injection Wells EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives IL RGA HWS__________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List IL RGA LF --------------------- Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List IL RGA LUST_________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there are 3 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page AMADA ENGINEERING Lower Elevation GESTETNER CORP NORTHFIELD LABS Address 851 FEEHANVILLE DR 1200 BUSINESS CTR DR SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) 19 41 Direction / Distance Map ID Page SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.215 mi.) 18 39 E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.243 mi.) 21 45 RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there are 5 RCRA-CESQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page MT PROSPECT SPECIALT 800 BIERMANN CT STE WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.025 mi.) B5 14 FISHER CLINICAL SVCS 699 N WHEELING RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.154 mi.) D14 27 E DOC 555 BUSINESS CENTER SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) 20 42 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page HEIDELBERG USA INC 625 SLA WIN CT SE 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) 7 18 STEWART WARNER CORP 580 SLAWIN CT SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.171 mi.) 16 34 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists IL LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's LUST Incident Report. A review of the IL LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/23/2017 has revealed that there is 1 IL LUST site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page MINISTRY CTR 1400 KENSINGTON RD ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.410 mi.) 22 47 NFA/NFR Letter: 1992-04-03 Incident Num: 912138 IL EPA Id: 311985084 TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State and tribal registered storage tank lists IL UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Illinois State Fire Marshal's STC Facility List. A review of the IL UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/24/2017 has revealed that there is 1 IL UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page G D SEARLE & CO 699 N WHEELING RD, S WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.154 mi.) D13 26 Tank Status: Removed Status: CLOSED Facility Id: 2029944 IL AST: Listing of all aboveground tanks inspected by Office of State Fire Marshal. A review of the IL AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/06/2017 has revealed that there are 3 IL AST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Eaual/Hiaher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Not reported 800 BIERMANN Occupancy Number: CN -059-1427312169243 CORELINK DATA CENTER 800 EAST BUSINESS CE Occupancy Number: 001 -CN -059 CORELINK DATA CENTER 800 EAST BUSINESS CE Occupancy Number: 001 -CN -059 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.025 mi.) B4 SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) C9 SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) C10 Page 13 22 22 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there are 5 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page MT PROSPECT MAIL PHA 800 BIERMAN WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.025 mi.) B3 8 MITSUBISHI CNC 800 EAST BUSINESS CE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.117 mi.) C8 20 XYTEL CORP 801 BUSINESS CENTER SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.151 mi.) C12 24 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page GRACO INC 1000 BUSINESS CENTER ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.058 mi.) 6 16 C -LINE PRODUCTS INC 1100 E BUSINESS CTR ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.135 mi.) 11 22 TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MN MANIFEST: Hazardous waste manifest data. A review of the MN MANIFEST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/30/2016 has revealed that there are 2 MN MANIFEST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SEARLE 700 E BUSINESS CENTE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.155 mi.) 15 31 SEARLE & CO 699 N WHEELING RD WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.202 mi.) D17 35 TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There were no unmapped sites in this report. TC5213454.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 OVERVIEW MAP - 5213454.2S � Target Property A, Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property 1 Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites E C a k O 1 ��� E u c l i d A v Euclid Ave G s � 2 i X22 a n s 1 g t o n Rd E K n s i n t n R -D 7 9A A b , X16 1 20 �g � r y S i� a n a I d 3 c S_ �9 I TT -FT • 0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles Indian Reservations BIA Upgradient Area Power transmission lines 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone 0 National Wetland Inventory 0 State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court CONTACT: Lauren Trzaskus Mount Prospect IL 60056 INQUIRY #: 5213454.2s LAT/LONG: 42.07968 / 87.921639 DATE: March 09, 2018 1:02 pm Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015. Target Property A, Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property 1 Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites 0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles Indian Reservations BIA Upgradient Area Power transmission lines 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone 0 National Wetland Inventory 0 State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court CONTACT: Lauren Trzaskus Mount Prospect IL 60056 INQUIRY #: 5213454.2s LAT/LONG: 42.07968 / 87.921639 DATE: March 09, 2018 1:02 pm Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015. DETAIL MAP - 5213454.2S E Elderberry Dr 3 � z p 'P a 7 a 0 P P E H a c k b a r r Ln of eld Gt E Ironwood Dr E K e n s 1 n g t o n R d z - ♦6 ♦11 _. S C e n 1 e r D r e D e S -D17 A 3 0° 0 -15 -C -1 AC 12 *16 -20 s X18 i E L.i n d e n L eohanv'I F 0 1/16 1/9 1/4 Mlles Indian Reservations BIA 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone 0 National Wetland Inventory 0 State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court CONTACT: Lauren Tr2askus Mount Prospect IL 60056 INQUIRY #: 5213454.2s LAT/LONG: 42.07968 / 87.921639 DATE: March 09, 2018 1:03 pm Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015. Target Property A, Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property 1 Manufactured Gas Plants t Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites Dept. Defense Sites eohanv'I F 0 1/16 1/9 1/4 Mlles Indian Reservations BIA 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone 0 National Wetland Inventory 0 State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court CONTACT: Lauren Tr2askus Mount Prospect IL 60056 INQUIRY #: 5213454.2s LAT/LONG: 42.07968 / 87.921639 DATE: March 09, 2018 1:03 pm Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS -ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 3 NR NR NR 3 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 2 3 NR NR NR 5 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS IL SSU 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists IL SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IL CCDD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IL LF SPECIAL WASTE 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IL NIPC 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists IL LUST 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1 TC5213454.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IL LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 IL UST 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 IL AST 0.250 3 0 NR NR NR 3 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries IL ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IL INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites IL SRP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites IL BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 US CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Local Land Records LIENS 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL SPILLS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 3 2 NR NR NR 5 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TC5213454.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TC5213454.2s Page 6 Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 HIST FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 ABANDONED MINES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FINDS 0.001 1 0 NR NR NR NR 1 DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 IL AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL BOL 0.001 1 0 NR NR NR NR 1 IL CHICAGO ENV 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 IL DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 IL Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL HWAR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL IMPDMENT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 MN MANIFEST 0.250 0 2 NR NR NR 2 IL NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL PIMW 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 IL TIER 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TC5213454.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives IL RGA HWS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 IL RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0 - Totals -- 2 8 11 1 0 0 22 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5213454.2s Page 7 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site Al AMADA ENGINEERING Target 799 BIERMAN CT Property MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Actual: FINDS: 656 ft. Registry ID: 110018253593 Environmental Interest/Information System ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations Clock this hv,parlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. A2 AMADA ENGINEERING Target 799 BIERMAN CT Date form received by agency: 05/10/2013 Property MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Facility address: Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Actual: BOL: ILR000112896 656 ft. Site Id: 170000466216 WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 Inv Num: 0311985139 Contact address: Interest Name: Amada Engineering WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 Interest Type: BOL Contact telephone: Media Code: LAND B3 WSW < 1/8 0.025 mi. 132 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 660 ft. MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY 800 BIERMAN MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number FINDS 1008128699 N/A IL BOL S113260196 N/A RCRA NonGen/NLR 1006806979 FINDS ILR000112896 ECHO Site 1 of 3 in cluster B RCRA NonGen / NLR: Date form received by agency: 05/10/2013 Facility name: MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY Facility address: 800 BIERMAN CT MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILR000112896 Mailing address: ONE CVS DR WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 Contact: WENDY L BRANT Contact address: ONE CVS DR WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 401-765-1500 Contact email: WENDY.BRANT@CVSCAREMARK.COM EPA Region: 05 Land type: Private Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: GRAND ILLUSIONS TC5213454.2s Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY (Continued) Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: 800 BIERMAN MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US 847-296-4700 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Owner 12/04/2002 Not reported GRAND ILLUSIONS 800 BIERMAN MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US 847-296-4700 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator 12/04/2002 Not reported CVS CAREMARK 800 BIERMAN MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator 01/01/1900 Not reported PFG 800 BIERMANN LTD PTNSHP 800 BIERMAN MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Owner 01/01/2001 Not reported CVS CAREMARK 800 BIERMAN MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1006806979 TC5213454.2s Page 9 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY (Continued) 1006806979 Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 01/01/1900 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: CAREMARK LLC 800 BIERMAN MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator 01/01/2001 Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 03/01/2013 Site name: MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY Classification: Not a generator, verified Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D010 Waste name: SELENIUM Waste code: D011 Waste name: SILVER Waste code: D024 Waste name: M -CRESOL Waste code: P001 Waste name: 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS, TC5213454.2s Page 10 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY (Continued) 1006806979 WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% Waste code: P075 Waste name: NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, & Waste code: SALTS Date form received by agency: 04/20/2012 Site name: MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY Classification: Large Quantity Generator Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D002 Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE Waste code: D007 Waste name: CHROMIUM Waste code: D010 Waste name: SELENIUM Waste code: D011 Waste name: SILVER Waste code: D024 Waste name: M -CRESOL Waste code: D026 Waste name: CRESOL Waste code: P001 Waste name: 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% Waste code: P075 Waste name: NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, & SALTS Date form received by agency: 03/01/2012 Site name: MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY Classification: Large Quantity Generator Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D010 Waste name: SELENIUM Waste code: D011 Waste name: SILVER Waste code: D024 Waste name: M -CRESOL TC5213454.2s Page 11 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MT PROSPECT MAIL PHARMACY (Continued) 1006806979 Waste code: P001 Waste name: 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% Waste code: P075 Waste name: NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, & SALTS Date form received by agency: 12/06/2002 Site name: GRAND ILLUSIONS Classification: Small Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 12/04/2002 Site name: GRAND ILLUSIONS Classification: Small Quantity Generator Violation Status Evaluation Action Summary: Evaluation date: Evaluation: Area of violation: Date achieved compliance: Evaluation lead agency: FINDS: Registry ID No violations found 05/10/2013 COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE Not reported Not reported State 110013387370 Environmental Interest/Information System ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER Clock this hTnarlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. ECHO: Envid: 1006806979 Registry ID: 110013387370 DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110013387370 TC5213454.2s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS B4 Incident Report Date: 10/12/2007 WSW 800 BIERMANN Incident Location City: < 1/8 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL Cook 0.025 mi. Willis, Jennifer/Comm Center/IEMA Date Entered: 132 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster B Closed Relative: AST: Caller: Higher Occupancy Number: CN -059-1427312169243 Actual: Occupant Type: 059 - ABOVE GROUND BULK STORAGE 660 ft. Section Number: CN Section: Property Owner Name: CVS CAREMARK MAIL ORDER PHARMACY Not reported Type: TANK - ABOVE GROUN IEMA SPILLS: Incident Number: H-2007-1367 Incident Report Date: 10/12/2007 Street Address Of Incident Location: 800 Biermann Incident Location City: Mount Prospect Incident Location County: Cook Entered By: Willis, Jennifer/Comm Center/IEMA Date Entered: Not reported Data Input Status: Closed Leaking Underground Storage Tank (Lust)?: Not reported Caller: Mike Titre Caller Represents: ComEd Hazmat Incident Type: Leak or Spill Date/Time Occurred: Not reported Mile Post: Not reported Section: Not reported Township: Not reported Range: Not reported Area Involved: Fixed Facility Media/Medium Into Which Release Occurred: Not reported Temp: n/a Wind: n/a Material Name: Mineral oil Type: Liquid Chris Code: unk CAS#: unk UN/NA #: unk 302(A) Extremely Hazardous Substance?: No Is This A RCRA Hazardous Waste?: No Is This A RCRA Regulated Facility?: No Container Type: transformer Container Size: 150 Gallon Amount Released: 150 Gallon Rate Of Release/Min: Not reported Duration Of Release: Not reported Cause Of Release: equip. failure Estimated Spill Extent: 400 Spill Extent Units: Square Feet Date/Time Incident Occurred: Not reported Check If Unknown (Occurrence): Not reported Date/Time Discovered: Not reported Check If Unknown (Discovered): Not reported Where Taken: none On Scene Contact: Mike Titre Public Health Risks/Precautions Taken: none Number Of People Evacuated: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number IL AST S115768271 IL SPILLS N/A TC5213454.2s Page 13 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site (Continued) Assistance Needed From State Agencies Containment/Cleanup Actions And Plans: Responsible Name: Facility Manager: Facility Manager Phone #: Street1: Contacted ESDA?: ESDA On Scene?: Specific ESDA Agency Contacted: Contacted Fire Department?: Fire Department On Scene?: Name Of Fire Department Contacted: Contacted Police Department?: Police Department On Scene?: Name Of Police Department Contacted: Sheriff Police Department?: Sheriff Department On Scene?: Name Of Sheriff Department Contacted: Was An Agency Other Than ESDA: Fire Police Or Sheriff Contacted?: Was This Other Agency On Scene?: Name Of Other Agency Contacted: Agency Notified Name: Date/Time Agency Notified: Narrative: Follow Up: B5 MT PROSPECT SPECIALTY PHARMACY WSW 800 BIERMANN CT STE B < 1/8 MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 0.025 mi. MT PROSPECT SPECIALTY PHARMACY 132 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster B MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number none contractor ComEd Not reported Not reported 3 Lincoln Center, 3rd floor, Oakbrook Terrace, 60181-4260 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Mike Titre Not reported Not reported Not reported Jan 27 2010 11:17AM 10-12-07 [EPA was on scene Reg.40SFM. Not reported S115768271 10-12-07 1240 JW- Faxed to IEPA, NRTP, RCRA-CESQG 1014952587 ILR000169565 Relative: RCRA-CESQG: Higher Date form received by agency: 05/01/2012 Actual: Facility name: MT PROSPECT SPECIALTY PHARMACY 660 ft. Facility address: 800 BIERMANN CT STE B MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILR000169565 Mailing address: ONE CVS DR WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 Contact: WENDY L BRANT Contact address: ONE CVS DR WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 401-765-1500 Contact email: WENDY.BRANT@CVSCAREMARK.COM EPA Region: 05 Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting TC5213454.2s Page 14 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number MT PROSPECT SPECIALTY PHARMACY (Continued) 1014952587 from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: CAREMARK LLC Owner/operator address: Not reported Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Not reported Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Operator Owner/Op start date: 01/01/2001 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Owner/operator name: PFG 800 BIERMANN LTD PTNSHP Owner/operator address: Not reported Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Not reported Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 01/01/2001 Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D002 Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE TC5213454.2s Page 15 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 6 ESE < 1/8 0.058 mi. 308 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 651 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site MT PROSPECT SPECIALTY PHARMACY (Continued) Waste code: D007 Waste name: CHROMIUM Waste code: D010 Waste name: SELENIUM Waste code: D011 Waste name: SILVER Waste code: D024 Waste name: M -CRESOL Waste code: D026 Waste name: CRESOL EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1014952587 Waste code: P001 Waste name: 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS, GRACO INC WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & 1000 BUSINESS CENTER DR SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% Waste code: P075 Waste name: NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, & 9451 W BELMONT SALTS Violation Status: No violations found GRACOINC 1000 BUSINESS CENTER DR MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 RCRA NonGen/NLR 1000176677 ILD980995567 RCRA NonGen / NLR: NAME NOT REPORTED Date form received by agency: 10/15/1984 Facility name: GRACO INC Facility address: 1000 BUSINESS CENTER DR Not reported MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILD980995567 Mailing address: 9451 W BELMONT Not reported FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 Contact: RALPH BRUSKO Contact address: 9451 W BELMONT FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 312-678-7200 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: NAME NOT REPORTED Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: 312-555-1212 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported TC5213454.2s Page 16 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site GRACO INC (Continued) Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: MAP FINDINGS Not reported Private Owner Not reported Not reported NAME NOT REPORTED ADDRESS NOT REPORTED CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998 Not reported 312-555-1212 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000176677 Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: F001 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLORETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE AND CHLORINATED FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F002 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE, CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND 1,1,2, TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. TC5213454.2s Page 17 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 7 SE < 1/8 0.093 mi. 492 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number GRACO INC (Continued) 1000176677 Waste code: F005 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Violation Status: No violations found HEIDELBERG USA INC 625 SLAWIN CT MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 RCRA-CESQG 1004478827 FINDS ILD984852871 ECHO Relative: RCRA-CESQG: HEIDELBERG EASTERN INC Lower Date form received by agency: 09/24/2002 Actual: Facility name: HEIDELBERG USA INC 654 ft. Facility address: 625 SLAWIN CT Not reported MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILD984852871 Contact: FRANK E COLOMER JR Contact address: 625 SLAWIN CT Not reported MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 847-390-8900 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: HEIDELBERG EASTERN INC Owner/operator address: 90 30 METROPOLITION AVE REGO PARK, NY 11374 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: 718-830-7800 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported TC5213454.2s Page 18 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site HEIDELBERG USA INC (Continued) Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 03/02/1992 Site name: HEIDELBERG USA INC Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Violation Status FINDS: Registry ID: No violations found 110001823670 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Environmental Interest/Information System AFS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Subsystem) replaces the former Compliance Data System (CDS), the National Emission Data System (NEDS), and the Storage and Retrieval of Aerometric Data (SAROAD). AIRS is the national repository for information concerning airborne pollution in the United States. AFS is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. AFS data are utilized by states to prepare State Implementation Plans to comply with regulatory programs and by EPA as an input for the estimation of total national emissions. AFS is undergoing a major redesign to support facility operating permits required under Title V of the Clean Air Act. ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. AIR MINOR 1004478827 TC5213454.2s Page 19 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Site Database(s) EPA ID Number HEIDELBERG USA INC (Continued) 1004478827 Clock this hTnarlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. ECHO: Envid: 1004478827 Registry ID: 110001823670 DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110001823670 C8 MITSUBISHI CNC RCRA NonGen / NLR SSW 800 EAST BUSINESS CENTER DR FINDS < 1/8 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 ECHO 0.117 mi. 619 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster C Relative: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Higher Date form received by agency: 11/01/2007 Actual: Facility name: MITSUBISHI CNC 657 ft. Facility address: 800 EAST BUSINESS CENTER DR MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILD984779819 Contact: ENV COORDINATOR Contact address: Not reported Not reported Contact country: US Contact telephone: 847-296-2100 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: MITSUBISHI CORP ADDRESS NOT REPORTED CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998 Not reported 312-555-1212 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Owner Not reported Not reported NAME NOT REPORTED ADDRESS NOT REPORTED CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998 Not reported 312-555-1212 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator Not reported Not reported 1000390191 ILD984779819 TC5213454.2s Page 20 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number MITSUBISHI CNC (Continued) Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency:12/12/1989 Site name: MITSUBISHI CNC Classification: Large Quantity Generator Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D002 Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE Violation Status: No violations found FINDS: Registry ID: 110005870646 Environmental Interest/Information System ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. Clink this hgperlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. ECHO: Envid: 1000390191 Registry ID: 110005870646 DFR URL: hftp://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110005870646 1000390191 TC5213454.2s Page 21 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation C9 SSW < 1/8 0.117 mi. 619 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 657 ft. C10 SSW < 1/8 0.117 mi. 619 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 657 ft. 11 ESE 1/8-1/4 0.135 mi. 714 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 650 ft. MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CORELINK DATA CENTERS TANK# 1-3200 IL AST A100386824 800 EAST BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE N/A MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Site 2 of 4 in cluster C AST: Occupancy Number: Occupant Type: Section Number: Property Owner Name Type: 001 -CN -059 059 - ABOVE GROUND BULK STORAGE CN CORELINK DATA CENTERS LLC TANK-ABOVEGROUNDB CORELINK DATA CENTERS TANK# 2-3200 800 EAST BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Site 3 of 4 in cluster C AST: Occupancy Number: Occupant Type: Section Number: Property Owner Name Type: C -LINE PRODUCTS INC 1100 E BUSINESS CTR DR MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 001 -CN -059 059 - ABOVE GROUND BULK STORAGE CN CORELINK DATA CENTERS LLC TANK-ABOVEGROUNDB IL AST A100386825 N/A RCRA NonGen / NLR 1000359846 ILD146566575 RCRA NonGen / NLR: C -LINE PRODUCTS INC Date form received by agency: 11/05/2009 Facility name: C -LINE PRODUCTS INC Facility address: 1100 E BUSINESS CTR DR US MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILD146566575 Contact: THOMAS F ROBERTSON Contact address: Not reported Not reported Not reported Contact country: US Contact telephone: 847-827-6661 Telephone ext.: 3363 Contact email: SROBERTSON@C-LINE.COM EPA Region: 05 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: C -LINE PRODUCTS INC Owner/operator address: Not reported Not reported Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported TC5213454.2s Page 22 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS C -LINE PRODUCTS INC (Continued) Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Private Operator 03/02/1998 Not reported C -LINE PRODUCTS INC Not reported Not reported US Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Owner 03/02/1998 Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 04/01/2006 Site name: AMERICAN CYANAMID CO DIST CTR Classification: Not a generator, verified Date form received by agency: 03/01/1994 Site name: AMERICAN CYANAMID CO Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/01/1992 Site name: AMERICAN CYANAMID CO Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 12/19/1986 Site name: AMERICAN CYANAMID CO DIST CTR Classification: Large Quantity Generator Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Violation Status: No violations found EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000359846 TC5213454.2s Page 23 Map ID U.S. importer of hazardous waste: MAP FINDINGS Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Direction No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No Distance No Furnace exemption: No Elevation Site Database(s) C12 XYTEL CORP RCRA NonGen/NLR SSW 801 BUSINESS CENTER DR MILTS 1/8-1/4 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 FINDS 0.151 mi. ECHO 796 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster C Relative: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Higher Date form received by agency: 08/20/1985 Actual: Facility name: XYTEL CORP 656 ft. Facility address: 801 BUSINESS CENTER DR MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILD074421504 Contact: MICHAEL MATSON Contact address: 801 BUSINESS CENTER DR MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 312-299-9200 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: NAME NOT REPORTED ADDRESS NOT REPORTED CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998 Not reported 312-555-1212 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Owner Not reported Not reported NAME NOT REPORTED ADDRESS NOT REPORTED CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998 Not reported 312-555-1212 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No EDR ID Number EPA ID Number 1000203414 ILD074421504 TC5213454.2s Page 24 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site XYTEL CORP (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000203414 Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: F002 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, Violation Status: METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE, MLTS: CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, License Number: ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND 1,1,2, First License Date: TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE License Date: USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE Lic. Expiration Date: ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F004, AND Contact Name: F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F005 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F024 Waste name: PROCESS WASTES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DISTILLATION RESIDUES, HEAVY ENDS, TARS, AND REACTOR CLEAN-OUT WASTES FROM THE PRODUCTION OF CERTAIN CHLORINATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS BY FREE RADICAL CATALYZED PROCESSES. THESE CHLORINATED ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS ARE THOSE HAVING CARBON CHAIN LENGTHS RANGING FROM ONE TO, AND INCLUDING FIVE, WITH VARYING AMOUNTS AND POSITIONS OF CHLORINE SUBSTITUTION. (THIS LISTING DOES NOT INCLUDE WASTEWATERS, WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE, SPENT CATALYSTS, AND WASTES LISTED IN SECTIONS 261.31. OR 261.32) Violation Status: No violations found MLTS: License Number: 12-24687-01 First License Date: 04/30/86 License Date: 04/30/86 Lic. Expiration Date: 04/30/91 Contact Name: SERGE RANDHAVA TC5213454.2s Page 25 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number XYTEL CORP (Continued) Contact Phone: Not reported Institution Code: 24687 Department/Bldg: Not reported States Allowing Use: Not reported Store Material Use: No Redistribution Use: No Incinerate Use: No Burial Use: No Last Inspection Date: 03/01/87 Next Inspection Date: 05/01/88 Licensee Contact: PRES. Inspector Name: Not reported FINDS: Registry ID: 110009371125 Environmental Interest/Information System ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. Clock this hv,parlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. ECHO: Envid: 1000203414 Registry ID: 110009371125 DFR URL: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110009371125 D13 G D SEARLE & CO WSW 699 N WHEELING RD, SUITE 111 MT PROSPECT - NITRODISC 1/8-1/4 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 0.154 mi. 815 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster D Relative: UST: Higher Facility ID: Actual: Facility Status: 659 ft. Facility Type: Owner Id: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: Tank Number: Tank Status: Tank Capacity: Tank Substance: Last Used Date: 2029944 CLOSED INDUSTRIAL / MANUFACTURING 00019417 Searle G D 5200 Old Orchard Rd Corpoate Office Skokie, IL 60077 1 Removed 550 Diesel Fuel 7/14/1993 1000203414 IL UST 0000782463 N/A TC5213454.2s Page 26 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site G D SEARLE & CO (Continued) OSFM First Notify Date: 5/7/1992 Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported Install Date: Not reported Green Tag Decal: Not reported Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported Fee Due: Not reported Motor Fuel Permit Inspection Date: Not reported Motor Fuel Permit Expiration Date: Not reported MOTOR FUEL TYPE: Not reported Pending Nov: N IEMA: Not reported Equipment Type: Not reported Equipment: Not reported Last Passing Date: Not reported Test Expire Date: Not reported Removed Date: 7/14/1993 Abandoned Date: Not reported D14 FISHER CLINICAL SVCS WSW 699 N WHEELING RD 1/8-1/4 MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 0.154 mi. FISHER CLINICAL SVCS 815 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster D EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0000782463 RCRA-CESQG 1000363943 ILD982616104 Relative: RCRA-CESQG: Higher Date form received by agency: 03/01/2010 Actual: Facility name: FISHER CLINICAL SVCS 659 ft. Facility address: 699 N WHEELING RD MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILD982616104 Contact: SCOTT FRAJERMAN Contact address: Not reported Not reported Contact country: US Contact telephone: 847-768-8090 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: FISHER CLINICAL SVCS Owner/operator address: 699 N WHEELING RD TC5213454.2s Page 27 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site FISHER CLINICAL SVCS (Continued) Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: MAP FINDINGS MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator 12/01/2003 Not reported FISHER CLINICAL SVCS 699 N WHEELING RD MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Owner 12/01/2003 Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 03/01/2008 Site name: FISHER CLINICAL SVCS Classification: Not a generator, verified Date form received by agency: 03/01/2007 Site name: FISHER CLINICAL SVCS Classification: Small Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/01/2006 Site name: FISHER CLINICAL SVCS Classification: Small Quantity Generator EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000363943 TC5213454.2s Page 28 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number FISHER CLINICAL SVCS (Continued) 1000363943 Date form received by agency: 07/26/2004 Site name: FISHER CLINICAL SVCS Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D035 Waste name: METHYL ETHYL KETONE Waste code: F005 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Date form received by agency: 10/23/2001 Site name: NUTRASWEET CO THE Classification: Small Quantity Generator Waste code: D000 Waste name: Not Defined Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D002 Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE Waste code: D009 Waste name: MERCURY Waste code: D011 Waste name: SILVER Waste code: D019 Waste name: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE Waste code: D022 Waste name: CHLOROFORM Waste code: D035 Waste name: METHYL ETHYL KETONE Waste code: F002 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1 -TRICHLOROETHANE, CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND 1,1,2, TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. TC5213454.2s Page 29 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site FISHER CLINICAL SVCS (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000363943 Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F005 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: 0001 Waste name: ACETALDEHYDE (1) (OR) ETHANAL (1) Waste code: 0002 Waste name: 2-PROPANONE (1) (OR) ACETONE (1) Waste code: 0006 Waste name: ACETYL CHLORIDE (C,R,T) Waste code: U045 Waste name: METHANE, CHLORO- (I,T) (OR) METHYL CHLORIDE (I,T) Waste code: U080 Waste name: METHANE, DICHLORO- (OR) METHYLENE CHLORIDE Waste code: U154 Waste name: METHANOL (1) (OR) METHYL ALCOHOL (1) Waste code: U211 Waste name: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE (OR) METHANE, TETRACHLORO- Waste code: U213 Waste name: FURAN, TETRAHYDRO-(I) (OR) TETRAHYDROFURAN (1) Waste code: U404 Waste name: ETHANAMINE, N,N-DIETHYL- (OR) TRIETHYLAMINE Date form received by agency: 09/20/2000 Site name: NUTRASWEET CO THE Classification: Small Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/01/2000 Site name: GD SEARLE/ PHARMACIA Classification: Not a generator, verified Date form received by agency: 03/01/1996 TC5213454.2s Page 30 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 15 SW 1/8-1/4 0.155 mi. 816 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 657 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site FISHER CLINICAL SVCS (Continued) Site name: G D SEARLE & CO Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 03/01/1992 Site name: G D STEARLE & CO Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 02/07/1990 Site name: G D STEARLE & CO Classification: Large Quantity Generator Date form received by agency: 12/27/1988 Site name: NUTRASWEET CO THE Classification: Large Quantity Generator Violation Status: No violations found SEARLE 700 E BUSINESS CENTER DR MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 MANIFEST: Manifest ID: Generator ID: Generator AI ID: Transporter 1 ID: Transporter 1 Al ID: Transporter 1 Al Name: Transporter 1 Address: Transporter 1 City: Transporter 1 State: Transporter ZIP: Transporter 2 ID: Transporter 2 AI ID: Transporter 2 Al Name: Transporter 2 Address: Transporter 2 City: Transporter 2 State: Transporter 2 ZIP: TSD ID: TSD Al ID: TSD Al Name: TSD Address: TSD City: TSD State: TSD Zip: Gen Copy Recd Date: Fac Copy Recd Date: Gen Ship Date: Trans 1 Recd Date: Trans 2 Recd Date: Tsd Recd Date: Comments: Detail: Manifest ID: Manifest Row: 6321 ILD039643671 44018 DED982565947 39884 Rollins Chempak Inc 2200 Concord Pike # A Wilmington DE 19803-2909 DER000000273 41237 Safeway Chemical Trans Inc 2200 Concord Pike FI 13 Wilmington DE 19803-2909 MND981190242 36830 Aptus Nei 21750 Cedar Ave Lakeville MN 55044 10/15/1996 0:00:00 1996-11-07 00:00:00 1996-10-09 00:00:00 1996-10-09 00:00:00 10/16/1996 0:00:00 1996-10-30 00:00:00 Not reported 6321 4 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000363943 MN MANIFEST S119126033 N/A TC5213454.2s Page 31 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SEARLE (Continued) S119126033 Haz Material Name: WASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS NOS Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN2924 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 3 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 135 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D001 Manifest ID: 6321 Manifest Row: 5 Haz Material Name: WASTE CORROSIVE LIQUID NOS Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN3264 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 20 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D002 Manifest ID: 6321 Manifest Row: 6 Haz Material Name: WASTE BROMINE SOLUTIONS Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN1744 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 10 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D002 Manifest ID: 6321 Manifest Row: 1 Haz Material Name: WASTE CORROSIVE LIQUIDS NOS Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN2922 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 5 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D009 Manifest ID: 6321 Manifest Row: 2 Haz Material Name: WASTE OXIDIXING LIQUID NOS Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN3098 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 10 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D001 TC5213454.2s Page 32 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SEARLE (Continued) S119126033 Manifest ID: 6321 Manifest Row: 3 Haz Material Name: WASTE TOXIC LIQUID Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN3287 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 20 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D004 Manifest ID: 6322 Generator ID: ILD039643671 Generator Al ID: 44018 Transporter 1 ID: DED982565947 Transporter 1 Al ID: 39884 Transporter 1 Al Name: Rollins Chempak Inc Transporter 1 Address: 2200 Concord Pike # A Transporter 1 City: Wilmington Transporter 1 State: DE Transporter 1 ZIP: 19803-2909 Transporter 2 ID: DER000000273 Transporter 2 AI ID: 41237 Transporter 2 Al Name: Safeway Chemical Trans Inc Transporter 2 Address: 2200 Concord Pike FI 13 Transporter 2 City: Wilmington Transporter 2 State: DE Transporter 2 ZIP: 19803-2909 TSD ID: MND981190242 TSD AI ID: 36830 TSD Al Name: Aptus Nei TSD Address: 21750 Cedar Ave TSD City: Lakeville TSD State: MN TSD Zip: 55044 Gen Copy Recd Date: 8/12/1996 0:00:00 Fac Copy Recd Date: 1996-08-19 00:00:00 Gen Ship Date: 1996-08-06 00:00:00 Trans 1 Recd Date: 1996-08-06 00:00:00 Trans 2 Recd Date: 8/8/1996 0:00:00 Tsd Recd Date: 1996-08-13 00:00:00 Comments: Not reported Detail: Manifest ID: 6322 Manifest Row: 2 Haz Material Name: HAZARDOUS WASTE LIQUID NOS Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: NA3082 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 10 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D008 TC5213454.2s Page 33 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site SEARLE (Continued) Manifest ID: 6322 Manifest Row: 3 Haz Material Name: WASTE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS NOS Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN1993 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 2 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 60 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D001 Manifest ID: 6322 Manifest Row: 1 Haz Material Name: MERCURIC ACETATE Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN1992 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 10 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D001 16 STEWART WARNER CORP SSE 580 SLAWIN CT 1/8-1/4 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 0.171 mi. 905 ft. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S119126033 RCRA-CESQG 1004694315 ILD984905539 Relative: RCRA-CESQG: Lower Date form received by agency: 10/09/1992 Actual: Facility name: STEWART WARNER CORP 649 ft. Facility address: 580 SLAWIN CT MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILD984905539 Contact: DAVE FORLAND Contact address: 580 SLAWIN CT MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 708-803-0200 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely TC5213454.2s Page 34 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation D17 WSW 1/8-1/4 0.202 mi. 1066 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 659 ft. MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Site Database(s) EPA ID Number STEWART WARNER CORP (Continued) 1004694315 hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: STEWARD WARNER CORP 580 SLAWIN CT MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Not reported 708-803-0200 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Owner Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Violation Status: No violations found SEARLE & CO 699 N WHEELING RD MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Site 3 of 3 in cluster D MANIFEST: Manifest ID: Generator ID: Generator Al ID: Transporter 1 ID: Transporter 1 AI ID: Transporter 1 AI Name: Transporter 1 Address: Transporter 1 City: Transporter 1 State: Transporter ZIP: Transporter 2 ID: Transporter 2 Al ID: Transporter 2 Al Name: 9414 ILD982616104 41975 DED982565947 39884 Rollins Chempak Inc 2200 Concord Pike # A Wilmington DE 19803-2909 MND022969026 3668 Dahlen Transport Inc MN MANIFEST S119126209 N/A TC5213454.2s Page 35 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SEARLE & CO (Continued) S119126209 Transporter 2 Address: 1680 4th Ave Transporter 2 City: Newport Transporter 2 State: MN Transporter 2 ZIP: 55055 TSD ID: MND981190242 TSD AI ID: 36830 TSD AI Name: Aptus Nei TSD Address: 21750 Cedar Ave TSD City: Lakeville TSD State: MN TSD Zip: 55044 Gen Copy Recd Date: 3/22/1996 0:00:00 Fac Copy Recd Date: 1996-03-22 00:00:00 Gen Ship Date: 1996-03-08 00:00:00 Trans 1 Recd Date: 1996-03-08 00:00:00 Trans 2 Recd Date: 3/15/1996 0:00:00 Tsd Recd Date: 1996-03-18 00:00:00 Comments: Not reported Detail: 9414 Manifest ID: 9414 Manifest Row: 1 Haz Material Name: WASTE D ICH LORI SOCYANATE Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN2465 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMML Waste Qty: 57 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D001 Manifest ID: 9414 Manifest Row: 2 Haz Material Name: WASTE DICHLORISOCYANATE Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN2465 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 50 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D001 Manifest ID: 9414 Manifest Row: 3 Haz Material Name: WASTE D ICH LORI SOCYANATE Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: UN2465 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 1 Container Code: DMPF Waste Qty: 50 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D001 Manifest ID: 9415 TC5213454.2s Page 36 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SEARLE & CO (Continued) Generator ID: Generator Al ID: Transporter 1 ID: Transporter 1 Al ID: Transporter 1 AI Name: Transporter 1 Address: Transporter 1 City: Transporter 1 State: Transporter ZIP: Transporter 2 ID: Transporter 2 Al ID: Transporter 2 Al Name: Transporter 2 Address: Transporter 2 City: Transporter 2 State: Transporter 2 ZIP: TSD ID: TSD Al ID: TSD Al Name: TSD Address: TSD City: TSD State: TSD Zip: Gen Copy Recd Date: Fac Copy Recd Date: Gen Ship Date: Trans 1 Recd Date: Trans 2 Recd Date: Tsd Recd Date: Comments: Detail: Manifest ID: Manifest Row: Haz Material Name: Haz Class Number: UN NA Number: Packing Group Number: Container Qty: Container Code: Waste Qty: Waste Units Code: Waste Code List: Manifest ID: Generator ID: Generator AI ID: Transporter 1 ID: Transporter 1 Al ID: Transporter 1 AI Name: Transporter 1 Address: Transporter 1 City: Transporter 1 State: Transporter ZIP: Transporter 2 ID: Transporter 2 Al ID: Transporter 2 Al Name: MAP FINDINGS ILD982616104 41975 DED982565947 39884 Rollins Chempak Inc 2200 Concord Pike # A Wilmington DE 19803-2909 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported MN0000903468 8215 Onyx Environmental Services 405 86th St W Bloomington MN 55420 9/30/1996 0:00:00 1996-09-25 00:00:00 1996-09-23 00:00:00 1996-09-23 00:00:00 Not reported 1996-09-24 00:00:00 Not reported 9415 1 MERCURY, LEAD, CADMIUM Not reported NA3077 Not reported 1 BXPF 850 IB D009 9416 ILD982616104 41975 SCD987574647 32928 Laidlaw Environmental Services Tg Inc 350 Railroad St Roebuck SC 29376-3122 Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S119126209 TC5213454.2s Page 37 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SEARLE & CO (Continued) S119126209 Transporter 2 Address: Not reported Transporter 2 City: Not reported Transporter 2 State: Not reported Transporter 2 ZIP: Not reported TSD ID: MN0000903468 TSD AI ID: 8215 TSD AI Name: Onyx Environmental Services TSD Address: 405 86th St W TSD City: Bloomington TSD State: MN TSD Zip: 55420 Gen Copy Recd Date: 4/6/1998 0:00:00 Fac Copy Recd Date: 1998-04-13 00:00:00 Gen Ship Date: 1998-03-26 00:00:00 Trans 1 Recd Date: 1998-03-26 00:00:00 Trans 2 Recd Date: Not reported Tsd Recd Date: 1998-04-08 00:00:00 Comments: Not reported Detail: 9417 Manifest ID: 9416 Manifest Row: 1 Haz Material Name: MERCURY Haz Class Number: Not reported UN NA Number: NA3077 Packing Group Number: Not reported Container Qty: 5 Container Code: BXPF Waste Qty: 250 Waste Units Code: IB Waste Code List: D009 Manifest ID: 9417 Generator ID: ILD982616104 Generator Al ID: 41975 Transporter 1 ID: DED982565947 Transporter 1 Al ID: 39884 Transporter 1 Al Name: Rollins Chempak Inc Transporter 1 Address: 2200 Concord Pike # A Transporter 1 City: Wilmington Transporter 1 State: DE Transporter 1 ZIP: 19803-2909 Transporter 2 ID: DER000000273 Transporter 2 Al ID: 41237 Transporter 2 Al Name: Safeway Chemical Trans Inc Transporter 2 Address: 2200 Concord Pike FI 13 Transporter 2 City: Wilmington Transporter 2 State: DE Transporter 2 ZIP: 19803-2909 TSD ID: MND985746569 TSD AI ID: 40183 TSD AI Name: Recyclights Tsee Inc TSD Address: 2010 E Hennepin Ave Ste B1912 TSD City: Minneapolis TSD State: MN TSD Zip: 55413-2760 Gen Copy Recd Date: 5/13/1997 0:00:00 TC5213454.2s Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SEARLE & CO (Continued) Fac Copy Recd Date: Gen Ship Date: Trans 1 Recd Date: Trans 2 Recd Date: Tsd Recd Date: Comments: Detail: Manifest ID: Manifest Row: Haz Material Name: Haz Class Number: UN NA Number: Packing Group Number: Container Qty: Container Code: Waste Qty: Waste Units Code: Waste Code List: 18 GESTETNER CORP SSW 851 FEEHANVILLE DR 1/8-1/4 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 0.215 mi. 1133 ft. MAP FINDINGS 1997-06-04 00:00:00 1997-05-07 00:00:00 1997-05-07 00:00:00 5/12/1997 0:00:00 1997-05-30 00:00:00 Not reported 9417 1 HAZ SOLID NOS Not reported NA3077 Not reported 1 BXPF 400 IB D009 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S119126209 RCRA-SQG 1000403896 FINDS ILD104008073 ECHO Relative: RCRA-SQG: Owner/operator address: Lower Date form received by agency: 09/23/1986 Actual: Facility name: GESTETNER CORP 653 ft. Facility address: 851 FEEHANVILLE DR Not reported Owner/operator fax: MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Owner/operator extension: EPA ID: ILD104008073 Private Contact: MARTIN JONES Contact address: 851 FEEHANVILLE DR MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 312-699-0900 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: OPUS CORP Owner/operator address: ADDRESS NOT REPORTED CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: 312-555-1212 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner TC5213454.2s Page 39 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number GESTETNER CORP (Continued) Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Not reported Not reported NAME NOT REPORTED ADDRESS NOT REPORTED CITY NOT REPORTED, AK 99998 Not reported 312-555-1212 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator Not reported Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D003 Waste name: REACTIVE WASTE Violation Status: No violations found FINDS: Registry ID: 110005844907 Environmental Interest/Information System RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. Clink th'- hgperlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. 1000403896 TC5213454.2s Page 40 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site GESTETNER CORP (Continued) ECHO: Envid: Registry ID: DFR URL: 19 AMADA ENGINEERING SW 570 N WHEELING RD 1/8-1/4 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 0.222 mi. 1172 ft. MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000403896 1000403896 110005844907 http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-faci Iity-report?fid=110005844907 RCRA-SQG 1000184402 ILD984786657 Relative: RCRA-SQG: Owner/operator address: Higher Date form received by agency: 06/15/1990 Actual: Facility name: AMADA ENGINEERING 659 ft. Facility address: 570 N WHEELING RD Not reported Owner/operator fax: MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Owner/operator extension: EPA ID: ILD984786657 Private Contact: JJ OTTEN Owner/Op start date: Contact address: 570 N WHEELING RD Not reported MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 708-297-0351 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: AMADA INC Owner/operator address: Not reported Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): Not reported Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: Not reported Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No TC5213454.2s Page 41 Map ID E DOC INC Owner/operator address: MAP FINDINGS MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Direction US Owner/operator telephone: 847-824-5610 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Distance Not reported Legal status: EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number AMADA ENGINEERING (Continued) 1000184402 User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Violation Status: No violations found 20 E DOC RCRA-CESQG 1000364933 SW 555 BUSINESS CENTER DR FINDS ILD107626434 1/8-1/4 MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 ECHO 0.240 mi. 1269 ft. Relative: RCRA-CESQG: Higher Date form received by agency: 07/02/2015 Actual: Facility name: E DOC INC 656 ft. Facility address: 555 BUSINESS CENTER DR MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 EPA ID: ILD107626434 Contact: GLEN GRENDZINSKI Contact address: 555 BUSINESS CENTER DR MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 847-824-5610 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: E DOC INC Owner/operator address: 555 BUSINESS CENTER DR MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Owner/operator country: US Owner/operator telephone: 847-824-5610 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 06/01/2005 TC5213454.2s Page 42 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site E DOC (Continued) Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Owner/operator email: Owner/operator fax: Owner/operator extension: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: MAP FINDINGS Not reported E DOC INC 555 BUSINESS CENTER DR MT PROSPECT, IL 60056 US 847-824-5610 Not reported Not reported Not reported Private Operator 06/01/2005 Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Historical Generators: Date form received by agency: 04/11/2008 Site name: E DOC Classification: Small Quantity Generator Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Date form received by agency: 02/04/1998 Site name: ADVANTAGE MOLDING AND DECORATING Classification: Small Quantity Generator Waste code: D000 Waste name: Not Defined Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE Waste code: D008 Waste name: LEAD EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000364933 TC5213454.2s Page 43 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site E DOC (Continued) Waste code: D018 Waste name: BENZENE Waste code: D022 Waste name: CHLOROFORM Waste code: D028 Waste name: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000364933 Waste code: D035 Waste name: METHYL ETHYL KETONE Waste code: D039 Waste name: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE Waste code: D040 Waste name: TRICHLORETHYLENE Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F005 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Violation Status FINDS: Registry ID No violations found 110005845390 Environmental Interest/Information System ACES (Illinois - Agency Compliance And Enforcement System) is the Illinois EPA Project to facilitate the permitting operations RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and corrective action activities required under RCRA. TC5213454.2s Page 44 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 21 East 1/8-1/4 0.243 mi. 1282 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site E DOC (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000364933 Click thic hap Prlink while viewing on your computer to access additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. ECHO: Envid: Registry ID: DFR URL: NORTHFIELD LABS 1200 BUSINESS CTR DR STE 200 MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 1000364933 110005845390 hftp://echo.epa.gov/detailed-faciIity-report?fid=1 10005845390 RCRA-SQG 1000612859 IL AIRS ILD984830968 Relative: RCRA-SQG: Owner/operator address: Lower Date form received by agency: 07/15/1991 Actual: Facility name: NORTHFIELD LABS 651 ft. Facility address: 1200 BUSINESS CTR DR STE 200 Not reported Owner/operator fax: MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Owner/operator extension: EPA ID: ILD984830968 Private Contact: ANNE OCONNER Owner/Op start date: Contact address: 1200 BUSINESS CTR DR STE 200 Not reported MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Contact country: US Contact telephone: 708-635-0066 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 05 Classification: Small Small Quantity Generator Description: Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time Owner/Operator Summary Owner/operator name: DEWOSKIN RICHARD Owner/operator address: 1560 SHERMAN STE 1000 Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): EVANSTON, IL 60201 Owner/operator country: Not reported Owner/operator telephone: 708-864-3500 Owner/operator email: Not reported Owner/operator fax: Not reported Owner/operator extension: Not reported Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: Not reported Owner/Op end date: Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No TC5213454.2s Page 45 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site NORTHFIELD LABS (Continued) On-site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Waste code: D001 Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000612859 Waste code: D002 Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE Waste code: D011 Waste name: SILVER Waste code: D022 Waste name: CHLOROFORM Waste code: F003 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: F005 Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. Waste code: 0002 Waste name: 2-PROPANONE (1) (OR) ACETONE (1) Waste code: U044 Waste name: CHLOROFORM (OR) METHANE, TRICHLORO- Waste code: U122 Waste name: FORMALDEHYDE Waste code: U154 Waste name: METHANOL (1) (OR) METHYL ALCOHOL (1) Waste code: U196 Waste name: PYRIDINE TC5213454.2s Page 46 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 22 ENE 1/4-1/2 0.410 mi. 2167 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 652 ft. MAP FINDINGS Site NORTHFIELD LABS (Continued) Violation Status: No violations found IL AIRS: Facility ID: 1775 ID Number: 031198ABS Year: Not reported Contact Name: Not reported Contact Title: Not reported Contact Tele: Not reported Contact Extention: Not reported Contact EMail: Not reported Contact Fax: Not reported Cease Operation Date: 1/1/1901 SIC Code: Not reported NAICS Code: Not reported Address Type Code: LOC MINISTRY CTR 1400 KENSINGTON RD MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 LUST: Incident Num: IL EPA Id: Product: I E MA Date: Project Manager: Project Manager Phone: Email: PRP Name: PRP Contact: PRP Address: PRP City,St,Zip: PRP Phone: Site Classification: Section 57.5(g) Letter: Date Section 57.5(g) Letter: Non LUST Determination Letter: 20 Report Received: 45 Report Received: NFA/NFR Letter: NFR Date Recorded: UST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Facility Type: Owner Id: Owner Name: Owner Address: Owner City,St,Zip: Tank Number: Tank Status: Tank Capacity: Tank Substance: 912138 311985084 Fuel Oil 1991-08-02 Putrich (217)524-4827 Steve. Putrich@illinois.gov Northwest Assembly of God Pastor Robert Maddox 900 North Wolf Rd. Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 Not reported Not reported 731 Not reported Not reported 1991-10-22 1992-03-05 1992-04-03 Not reported 2027786 CLOSED NONE 00017649 Northwest Assembly Of God 900 Wolf Rd Mount Prospect, IL 60056 1 Removed 6000 Heating Oil EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000612859 IL LUST 0000856801 IL UST N/A TC5213454.2s Page 47 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site MINISTRY CTR (Continued) Last Used Date: 1/1/1901 OSFM First Notify Date: 8/16/1991 Red Tag Issue Date: Not reported Install Date: Not reported Green Tag Decal: Not reported Green Tag Issue Date: Not reported Green Tag Expire Date: Not reported Fee Due: Not reported Motor Fuel Permit Inspection Date: Not reported Motor Fuel Permit Expiration Date: Not reported MOTOR FUEL TYPE: Not reported Pending Nov: N IEMA: Not reported Equipment Type: Not reported Equipment: Not reported Last Passing Date: Not reported Test Expire Date: Not reported Removed Date: 9/20/1991 Abandoned Date: Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 0000856801 TC5213454.2s Page 48 v GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 NPL Site Boundaries Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4246 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5213454.2s Page GR -1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Federal CERCLIS list Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SEMS -ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5213454.2s Page GR -2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS -ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Federal RCRA generators list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 312-886-6186 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 312-886-6186 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5213454.2s Page GR -3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 312-886-6186 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 312-886-6186 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/28/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5213454.2s Page GR -4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2017 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2017 Telephone: 202-267-2180 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SSU: State Sites Unit Listing The State Response Action Program database identifies the status of all sites under the responsibility of the Illinois EPA's State Sites Unit. Date of Government Version: 06/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-524-4826 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists LF WMRC: Waste Management & Research Center Landfill Database The Waste Management & Research Center Landfill Database includes records from the Department of Public Health, Department of Mines & Minerals, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, State Geological Survey, Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission and Pollution Control Board. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2006 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 217-333-8940 Last EDR Contact: 09/18/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CCDD: Clean Construction or Demolition Debris Construction and demolition (C and D) debris is nonhazardous, uncontaminated material resulting from construction, remodeling, repair, or demolition of utilities, structures, and roads. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-524-3300 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SWF/LF: Available Disposal for Solid Waste in Illinois - Solid Waste Landfills Subject to State Surcharge Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2017 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-785-8604 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5213454.2s Page GR -5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LF SPECIAL WASTE: Special Waste Site List These landfills, as of January 1, 1990, accept non -hazardous special waste pursuant to the Illinois EPA Non -Hazardous Special Waste Definition. List A includes landfills that may receive any non -hazardous waste, Non -Regional Pollution Control Facilities are so noted. List B includes landfills designed to receive specific non -hazardous wastes. List B landfills are designated as a Regional Pollution Control Facility by RPCF, or Non -Regional Pollution Control Facility by Non-RPCF. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2009 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-782-9288 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IL NIPC: Solid Waste Landfill Inventory Solid Waste Landfill Inventory. NIPC is an inventory of active and inactive solid waste disposal sites, based on state, local government and historical archive data. Included are numerous sites which previously had never been identified largely because there was no obligation to register such sites prior to 1971. Date of Government Version: 08/01/1988 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/1994 Number of Days to Update: 11 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Source: Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission Telephone: 312-454-0400 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 10/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-524-3300 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5213454.2s Page GR -6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 04/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTS on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 04/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST TRUST: Underground Storage Tank Fund Payment Prioirty List In case sufficient funds are not available in the Underground Storage Tank Fund, requests for payment are entered on the Payment Priority List by "queue date" order. As required by the Environmental Protection Act, the queue date is the date that a complete request for partial or final payment was received by the Agency. The queue date is 'officially" confirmed at the end of the payment review process when a Final Decision Letter is sent to the site owner. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 83 State and tribal registered storage tank lists Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-782-6762 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5213454.2s Page GR -7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Underground Storage Tank Facility List Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 10/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Illinois State Fire Marshal Telephone: 217-785-0969 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AST: Above Ground Storage Tanks Listing of all aboveground tanks inspected by Office of State Fire Marshal. Date of Government Version: 10/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: State Fire Marshal Telephone: 217-785-1011 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5213454.2s Page GR -8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 10/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 134 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control/ engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS: Sites with Engineering Controls Sites using of engineered barriers (e.g., asphalt or concrete paving). Date of Government Version: 12/28/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-782-6761 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5213454.2s Page GR -9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Inst Control: Institutional Controls Legal or administrative restrictions on land use and/or other activities (e.g., groundwater use restrictions) which effectively limit exposure to contamination may be employed as alternatives to removal or treatment of contamination. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 22 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-782-6761 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SRP: Site Remediation Program Database The database identifies the status of all voluntary remediation projects administered through the pre -notice site cleanup program (1989 to 1995) and the site remediation program (1996 to the present). Date of Government Version: 12/28/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 22 State and tribal Brownfields sites Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-785-9407 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually BROWNFIELDS: Municipal Brownfields Redevelopment Grant Program Project Descriptions The Illinois Municipal Brownfields Redevelopment Grant Program (MBRGP) offers grants worth a maximum of $240,000 each to municipalities to assist in site investigation activities, development of cleanup objectives, and performance of cleanup activities. Brownfields are abandoned or underused industrial and/or commercial properties that are contaminated (or thought to be contaminated) and have an active potential for redevelopment. Date of Government Version: 02/11/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-785-3486 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BROWNFIELDS: Redevelopment Assessment Database The Office of Site Evaluations Redevelopment Assessment database identifies the status of all properties within the State in which the Illinois EPA's Office of Site Evaluation has conducted a municipal Brownfield Redevelopment Assessment. TC5213454.2s Page GR -10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 41 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-524-1658 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US BROWNFIELD& A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Local Lists of Landfill/ Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. TC5213454.2s Page GR -11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: 301-443-1452 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 CDL: Meth Drug Lab Site Listing A listing of clandestine/meth drug lab locations. Date of Government Version: 10/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 217-782-5750 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Local Land Records Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Records of Emergency Release Reports Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. TC5213454.2s Page GR -12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS: State spills A listing of incidents reported to the Office of Emergency Response. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-782-3637 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually IEMA SPILLS: Illinois Emergency Management Agency Spills A listing of hazardous materials incidents reported to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency. Date of Government Version: 10/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Illinois Emergency Management Agency Telephone: 217-524-0770 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 07/18/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2013 Number of Days to Update: 71 Other Ascertainable Records Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 312-886-6186 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5213454.2s Page GR -13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 10/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/28/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5213454.2s Page GR -14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 12/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title 111 Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 RMP: Risk Management Plans Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5213454.2s Page GR -15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 126 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5213454.2s Page GR -16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC5213454.2s Page GR -17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: 202-366-4595 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2017 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC5213454.2s Page GR -18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. TC5213454.2s Page GR -19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 10/29/2017 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/28/2017 Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 09/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5213454.2s Page GR -20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C -DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 07/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: EPA Telephone: (312) 353-2000 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 01/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 01/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/27/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 11/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AIRS: Air Inventory Listing A listing of air permits and emissions information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 144 Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-557-0314 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5213454.2s Page GR -21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING BOL: Bureau of Land Inventory Database Bureau of Land inventory for facility information. Data results are cross-linked with all on-line database system applications from IEPA - Bureau of Land as well as USEPA FRS database. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-785-9407 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CHICAGO ENV: Environmental Records Dataset This dataset serves as a lookup table to determine if environmental records exist in a Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) environmental dataset for a given address. COMPLAINTS: A "Y" indicates that one or more records exist in the CDPH Environmental Complaints dataset. NESHAPS and DEMOLITON NOTICES: A "Y" indicates that one or more records exist in the CDPH Asbestos and Demolition Notification dataset. ENFORCEMENT: A "Y" indicates that one or more records exist in the CDPH Environmental Enforcement dataset. INSPECTIONS: A "Y" indicates that one or more records exist in the CDPH Environmental Inspections dataset. PERMITS: A "Y" indicates that one or more records exist in the CDPH Environmental Permits dataset. TANKS: A "Y" indicates that one or more records exist in the CDPH Storage Tanks dataset. Date of Government Version: 12/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 COAL ASH: Coal Ash Site Listing A listing of coal ash site Icoations. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Chicago Department of Public Health Telephone: 312-745-3136 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-782-1654 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEANERS: Illinois Licensed Drycleaners Any retail drycleaning facility in Illinois must apply for a license through the Illinois Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund. Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund of Illinois. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2017 Source: Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund of Illinois Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/20/2017 Telephone: 800-765-4041 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2017 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance: Financial Assurance Information Listing Information for hazardous waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-782-9887 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWAR: Hazard Waste Annual Report Each year, Illinois hazardous -waste generators tell the Illinois EPA the amounts and kinds of hazardous waste they produced during the previous year. Generators indicate by code the types of wastes produced and the steps they took to manage these wastes. If some or all of these wastes were sent to commercial treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs), that information and the identity of each receiving facility also are submitted. Illinois TSDFs likewise report the types and quantities of wastes received from in-state and out-of-state generators; they also report the procedures they used to manage these wastes. TC5213454.2s Page GR -22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-524-3300 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually IMPDMENT: Surface Impoundment Inventory Statewide inventory of industrial, municipal, mining, oil & gas , and large agricultural impoundment. This study was conducted by the Illinois EPA to assess potentail for contamination of shallow aquifers. This was a one-time study. Although many of the impoundments may no longer be present, the sites may be contaminated. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1980 Source: Illinois Waste Management & Research Center Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2002 Telephone: 217-333-8940 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2002 Last EDR Contact: 02/20/2002 Number of Days to Update: 87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NPDES: A Listing of Active Permits A listing of facilities currently active in the state. The types of permits are public, private, federal and state. Date of Government Version: 04/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-782-0610 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PIMW: Potentially Infectious Medical Waste Potentially Infectious Medical Waste (PIMW) is waste generated in connection with the diagnosis, treatment (i.e., provision of medical services), or immunization of human beings or animals; research pertaining to the provision of medical services; or the provision or testing of biologicals. Date of Government Version: 12/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-524-3289 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TIER 2: Tier 2 Information Listing A listing of facilities which store or manufacture hazardous materials and submit a chemical inventory report. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/11/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Illinois Emergency Management Agency Telephone: 217-785-9860 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/28/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually UIC: Underground Injection Wells Injection wells are used for disposal of fluids by "injection" into the subsurface. The construction of injection wells range from very technical designs with twenty-four hour monitoring to simply a hole dug in the ground to control runoff. As a result of this diversity, the UIC Program divides injection wells into five different classes. Date of Government Version: 11/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records Source: Illinois EPA Telephone: 217-782-9878 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC5213454.2s Page GR -23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Natural Resources in Illinois. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5213454.2s Page GR -24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency in Illinois. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2014 Number of Days to Update: 193 Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency in Illinois. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 OTHER DATABASE(S) Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 11/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 34 NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 02/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/28/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2017 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2017 Telephone: 518-402-8651 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/13/2017 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2018 Number of Days to Update: 12 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5213454.2s Page GR -25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Telephone: 717-783-8990 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Last EDR Contact: 01/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Management Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Telephone: 401-222-2797 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. TC5213454.2s Page GR -26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Homes & Centers Listing Source: Department of Children & Family Services Telephone: 312-814-4150 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Illinois State Geological Survey Telephone: 217-333-4747 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5213454.2s Page GR -27 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPOSED MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE STATION 799 BIERMAN COURT MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 11fn1:10:119:2:101:2 =I:4rL910101NQIkirn119*1 Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Version Date: 42.07968 - 42° 4'46.85" 87.921639 - 87° 55' 17.90" Zone 16 423764.9 4658820.5 656 ft. above sea level 5681632 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 2012 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC5213454.2s Page A-1 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General ESE SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES c 0 > Wj rn N A rn N N m N T „ N N m N N m W O m N N rn m N N m N O m N N m N A T p rn N fn m N O rn N A rn N A m m N N N T. North I South TP W A r pOp V A r fOi� A N N N N A A N N A A - - - - TP Target Property Elevation: 656 ft. 1/2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC5213454.2s Page A-2 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Flood Plain Panel at Target Property 17031CO208J Additional Panels in search area: 17031CO206J 17031CO204J 17031CO209J NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Property ARLINGTON HEIGHTS HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data FEMA FIRM Flood data FEMA FIRM Flood data NWI Electronic Data Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site -Specific Hydrogeological Data*: Search Radius: 1.25 miles Status: Not found AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW 159 1/2 - 1 Mile NE NE 2G 1/2 - 1 Mile NE NE For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings 01996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. TC521 3454.2s Page A-3 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Paleozoic Category: Stratified Sequence System: Ordovician Series: Upper Ordovician (Cincinnatian) Code: 03 (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data. Soil Component Name: DRUMMER Soil Surface Texture: silty clay loam Hydrologic Group: Class B/D - Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can be drained and are classified. Soil Drainage Class: Poorly. Soils may have a saturated zone, a layer of low hydraulic conductivity, or seepage. Depth to water table is less than 1 foot. Hydric Status: Soil meets the requirements for a hydric soil. Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches TC5213454.2s Page A-4 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction Rate (in/hr) (pH) 1 0 inches 14 inches silty clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 7.80 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 5.60 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 2 14 inches 41 inches silty clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 7.80 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 5.60 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 3 41 inches 47 inches loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 8.40 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 6.10 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), Lean Clay Soils. 4 47 inches 60 inches stratified Silt -Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 8.40 Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 6.60 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Clayey sand. 200), Silty Soils. OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may appear within the general area of target property. Soil Surface Textures: silt loam loam Surficial Soil Types: silt loam loam Shallow Soil Types: clay loam Deeper Soil Types: loam sand and gravel gravelly - coarse sand loamy sand LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. TC5213454.2s Page A-5 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) WELL ID Federal USGS 1.000 ILSG20000239479 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 0.001 miles P11112 State Database 1.000 ILEP30000005635 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION 5 ILSG20000239849 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP Al USGS40000299986 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW D13 USGS40000299989 1/2 - 1 Mile West 14 USGS40000299972 1/2 - 1 Mile SE C15 USGS40000300036 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW F28 USGS40000299980 1/2 - 1 Mile West FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. TC5213454.2s Page A-6 LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP A2 ILSG20000239479 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW 3 P11112 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North A4 ILEP30000005635 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW 5 ILSG20000239849 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North B6 P11181 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE B7 P11182 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE 8 ILSG20000239552 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WNW 9 P11110 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE C10 ILEP30000007922 1/2-1 Mile NNW 11 ILSG20000240108 1/2 - 1 Mile North 12 ILSG20000240110 1/2 - 1 Mile North D16 ILSG20000239527 1/2-1 Mile West 17 ILSG20000238694 1/2 - 1 Mile SW 18 P11129 1/2-1 Mile West 19 ILSG20000238684 1/2 - 1 Mile SE E20 ILEP30000003870 1/2-1 Mile NNW 21 P11109 1/2-1 Mile ENE F22 ILSG20000239199 1/2 - 1 Mile West E23 ILSG20000240259 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW E24 ILSG20000240260 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW E25 ILSG20000240261 1/2-1 Mile NNW TC5213454.2s Page A-6 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION TC5213454.2s Page A-7 LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP E26 ILSG20000240262 1/2-1 Mile NNW G27 P11123 1/2 - 1 Mile NW 29 ILEP30000005624 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW G30 ILSG20000240256 1/2 - 1 Mile NW G31 ILSG20000240257 1/2 - 1 Mile NW G32 ILSG20000240258 1/2-1 Mile NW 33 P11178 1/2 - 1 Mile WSW 34 ILSG20000238461 1/2-1 Mile SSW 35 P11124 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 36 P11180 1/2 - 1 Mile SW 37 ILSG20000240428 1/2-1 Mile NNW H38 ILSG20000240198 1/2 - 1 Mile NW H39 ILSG20000240252 1/2-1 Mile NW H40 ILSG20000240255 1/2 - 1 Mile NW H41 ILSG20000240254 1/2-1 Mile NW H42 ILSG20000240253 1/2-1 Mile NW 44 P11113 1/2 - 1 Mile North 145 ILEP30000003750 1/2-1 Mile NE 46 P11183 1/2 - 1 Mile SE 47 ILSG20000238629 1/2 - 1 Mile SW J48 P11179 1/2-1 Mile SSW K49 P11131 1/2 - 1 Mile NW K50 P11130 1/2-1 Mile NW K51 P11132 1/2 - 1 Mile NW L52 P11114 1/2-1 Mile NNW L53 P11115 1/2-1 Mile NNW M54 P11139 1/2 - 1 Mile NW M55 P11138 1/2 - 1 Mile NW N56 ILSG20000240425 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW N57 ILSG20000240426 1/2-1 Mile NNW N58 ILSG20000240427 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW 60 P11111 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE N61 P11125 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW N62 P11126 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW J63 ILSG20000238340 1/2-1 Mile SSW 064 P11243 1/2 - 1 Mile East 065 P11245 1/2-1 Mile East 066 P11244 1/2 - 1 Mile East 067 P11246 1/2 - 1 Mile East 068 P11242 1/2-1 Mile East P69 P11241 1/2 - 1 Mile East P70 P11240 1/2-1 Mile East 71 ILSG20000240575 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW Q72 P11238 1/2 - 1 Mile East Q73 P11239 1/2-1 Mile East R74 ILSG20000240250 1/2 - 1 Mile NW R75 ILSG20000240251 1/2-1 Mile NW 76 ILEP30000003751 1/2 - 1 Mile NE S77 ILSG20000240422 1/2-1 Mile NW S78 ILSG20000240423 1/2-1 Mile NW S79 ILSG20000240424 1/2 - 1 Mile NW R80 P11141 1/2 - 1 Mile NW TC5213454.2s Page A-7 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP R81 P11140 1/2-1 Mile NW T82 ILSG20000240592 1/2-1 Mile NNE T83 ILSG20000240593 1/2 - 1 Mile NNE 84 P11237 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE Q85 ILSG20000239078 1/2 - 1 Mile East S86 P11134 1/2-1 Mile NW S87 P11133 1/2 - 1 Mile NW S88 P11135 1/2 - 1 Mile NW S89 P11136 1/2 - 1 Mile NW TC5213454.2s Page A-8 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 5213454.2s bio i E C mp McDonald Rd 0 4 S N 7 W616 R )K -5 FI G W. �C N' GJ, o o RD 2 g 1 Kensi g an Rd D A Kensin ton Rd C$ F � v 2.9 WQ d 33 84 aw D - 14 18 w36 7 0 0 46 4 , J d C n Rd D I II. 0 — oa County Boundary N Major Roads N Contour Lines OEarthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater ® Water Wells © Public Water Supply Wells ® Cluster of Multiple Icons 0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles Groundwater Flow Direction CG I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Cc v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location H D Closest Hydrogeological Data SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court CONTACT: Lauren Tr2askus Mount Prospect IL 60056 INQUIRY #: 5213454.2s LAT/LONG: 42.07968 / 87.921639 DATE: March 09, 2018 1:03 pm Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015. GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Al WNW 1/4 -1/2 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-IL Pt status: Formal name: USGS Illinois Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-420450087553801 Monloc name: 42N1 1E -34.1h1 Monloc type: Well 120310021600 Monloc desc: Not Reported Longitude : Huc code: 07120004 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -87.9272908 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Farm name: Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet 665 Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Wfmto: Formation type: Not Reported 0 Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 195807 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1958-07 36 A2 WNW 1/4 -1/2 Mile Higher Database EDR ID Number FED USGS USGS40000299986 Not Reported Not Reported 42.080583 24000 seconds 667.5 2.5 US 213 213 IL WELLS ILSG20000239479 Pt api number: 120310021600 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.927278 Pt latitude: 42.08066 Api number: 120310021600 Longitude : -87.927278 Latitude : 42.08066 Section: 34 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Manor Service Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Hoover Water Well Servic Status: Water Well Elevation: 665 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 213 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 TC5213454.2s Page A-10 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 3 Objectid: 0 North 20621 1/4 - 1/2 Mile 42.08056 Higher Not Reported Well ID: 036492 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Not Reported Fips cd: Owner: GERTRUDE SCHUREN Not Reported B name: Permit: M013654 Date Drilled: 07/26/1971 Depth (in feet): 115 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 26 Plot Location: 5D Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Amb well: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology I L0315150 Api: Driller: BOYSEN A4 WNW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Fid: Area Perimeter: Well id: X coord: Y coord: Fac name: Facility n: Addr one t: Addr two t: City name: Zip code: Pm cnty: Fed type c: Pop cnt: Lat dec de: Long dec d: Meridian: Range: Updt ts: W cws name: W status: W suscept: W min setb: W d depth: W aquifer: Pws status: Sys number: Site id: 5635 Objectid: 0 0 20621 -87.92734 42.08056 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported State code: Not Reported Fips cd: Not Reported Status cd: Not Reported B name: 0 0 0 Not Reported Township: Not Reported Section: Not Reported W cws num: IL AMERICAN -CHICAGO SUBURBAN B B2 W policy: 0 213 5656 Amb well: A Sdwis well: I L0315150 Api: ILEP30000005635 6714 Database EDR ID Number IL WELLS P11112 IL WELLS ILEP30000005635 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 0315150 C 0 WL20621 120310021600 TC5213454.2s Page A-11 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number 5 North IL WELLS ILSG20000239849 1/4 -1/2 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120313280800 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.922248 Pt latitude: 42.084406 Api number: 120313280800 Date Drilled: 00/00/1948 Longitude : -87.922248 Aquifer Type: Not Reported Latitude : 42.084406 County: COOK Section: 26 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Runge, Otto Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Pilgard, Peter Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 100 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 136 SSE IL WELLS P11181 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Well ID: 033212 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: PUBLIC SERVICE CO Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/1948 Depth (in feet): 260 Aquifer Type: Not Reported County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 35 Plot Location: Not Reported Well Use: IN Well Type: Record Type: Chemical Analysis,Any other type of record Driller: Not Reported 137 SSE IL WELLS P11182 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower Well ID: 036160 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: AUGUST DEERING Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000 Depth (in feet): 16 Aquifer Type: Not Reported County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 35 Plot Location: Not Reported Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Chemical Analysis,Any other type of record Driller: Not Reported TC5213454.2s Page A-12 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number 8 WNW IL WELLS ILSG20000239552 1/4 -1/2 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120312959400 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.930713 Pt latitude: 42.081674 Api number: 120312959400 Date Drilled: 06/14/1978 Longitude : -87.930713 Aquifer Type: Bedrock Latitude : 42.081674 County: COOK Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Latzel, Horst W. Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Pilgard, Peter Status: Water Well Elevation: 667 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 176 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 111 Wfmto: 176 Pumpgpm: 15 9 NNE IL WELLS P11110 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036490 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: GEORGE SPECHT Permit: M074040 Date Drilled: 06/14/1978 Depth (in feet): 147 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 26 Plot Location: Not Reported Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SZYMANSKI c10 NNW 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Fid: Area Perimeter: Well id: X coord: Y coord: Fac name: Facility n: Addr one t: Addr two t: City name: Zip code: 7922 0 0 20622 -87.92435 42.0871 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Objectid: State code: Fips cd: IL WELLS ILEP30000007922 9186 Not Reported Not Reported TC5213454.2s Page A-13 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pm cnty: Not Reported Status cd: Not Reported Fed type c: Not Reported B name: Not Reported Pop cnt: 0 Lat dec de: 0 Long dec d: 0 Pt status: WATER Meridian: Not Reported Township: Not Reported Range: Not Reported Section: Not Reported Updt ts: Not Reported W cws num: 0315150 W cws name: IL AMERICAN -CHICAGO SUBURBAN W status: B W suscept: B1 W policy: C W min setb: 0 Rng: 11 W d depth: 1468 Farm name: Brickman Manor W aquifer: 6080 Amb well: 0 Pws status: A Sdwis well: WL20622 Sys number: IL0315150 Api: 120310028900 Site id: ILEP30000007922 Wfmfrom: 0 11 North IL WELLS ILSG20000240108 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120310028900 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.921946 Pt latitude: 42.087514 Api number: 120310028900 Longitude : -87.921946 Latitude : 42.087514 Section: 26 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Brickman Manor Farm num: 2 Company name: Milaeger Well Drlg. Status: Water Well Elevation: 665 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 1470 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 12 North IL WELLS I LSG200002401 10 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120310132200 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.919728 Pt latitude: 42.087604 Api number: 120310132200 Longitude : -87.919728 Latitude : 42.087604 Section: 26 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Schuren Gertrude Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Boysen Drlrs. TC5213454.2s Page A-14 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Status: Water Well Elevation: 659 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 115 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 D13 West 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-IL Formal name: USGS Illinois Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-420452087555601 Monloc name: 42N11 E -27.3a1 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 07120004 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -87.932291 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 196006 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel iRI:11a1I:�tR=1111111111 14 SE 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Org.Identifier: USGS-IL Formal name: USGS Illinois Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-420424087545301 Monloc name: 42N 11 E -35.3d 1 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 07120004 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -87.9147902 Sourcemap scale: y=1II1bICI. YYIQQQ6' Not Reported Not Reported 42.0811386 24000 seconds 668.00 2.5 tlJ69 1468 1468 FED USGS USGS40000299972 Not Reported Not Reported 42.0733611 24000 TC5213454.2s Page A-15 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map USGS-420515087552801 Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 655.00 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 2.5 Vert accmeasure units: feet 07120004 Drainagearea value: Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Contrib drainagearea units: Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported 5 Horiz Acc measure units: Formation type: Not Reported Horiz coord refsys: Aquifer type: Not Reported Vert measure units: feet Construction date: 195803 Welldepth: 1328 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 1328 Wellholedepth units: ft Aquifername: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Formation type: Not Reported Feet below Feet to Not Reported Date Surface Sealevel Welldepth: Welldepth units: 1958-03 25.00 C15 NNW 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Org.Identifier: USGS-IL Formal name: USGS Illinois Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-420515087552801 Monloc name: 42N11E-26.7d1 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 07120004 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -87.9245131 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 195908 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1959-08-24 357.00 FED USGS USGS40000300036 Not Reported Not Reported 42.0875273 24000 seconds 654.00 2.5 US 1468 1468 D16 West IL WELLS ILSG20000239527 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-16 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120310029700 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.932455 IL WELLS P11129 Pt latitude: 42.081035 Api number: 120310029700 Longitude : -87.932455 Second ID: Not Reported Latitude : 42.081035 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Mt Prospect Vill Farm num: 0006 Company name: Wehling Well Works Inc. Status: Water Well Elevation: 670 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 1384 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 17 PILGARD SW IL WELLS ILSG20000238694 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120310021700 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.928704 Pt latitude: 42.073238 Api number: 120310021700 Longitude : -87.928704 Latitude : 42.073238 Section: 34 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Citizens Util Farm num: 1 Company name: Boysen Status: Water Well Elevation: 660 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 218 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 18 West IL WELLS P11129 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036514 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: HORST W LATZEL Permit: M114036 Date Drilled: 08/16/1984 Depth (in feet): 176 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 2A Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: PILGARD 19 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower IL WELLS ILSG20000238684 TC5213454.2s Page A-17 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120310022600 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.912675 03101557 Pt latitude: 42.073124 3299426.75 Api number: 120310022600 302 EAST EUCLID Longitude : -87.912675 PROSPECT HEIGHTS Latitude : 42.073124 Fips cd: Cook Section: 35 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Bluett Cent Food Farm num: 2 Company name: Boysen Drlrs. Status: Water Well Elevation: 652 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 265 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 E20 NNW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Fid: Area Perimeter: Well id: X coord: Y coord: Fac name: Facility n: Addr one t: Addr two t: City name: Zip code: Pm cnty: Fed type c: Pop cnt: Lat dec de: Long dec d: Meridian: Range: Updt ts: W cws name: W status: W suscept: W min setb: W d depth: W aquifer: Pws status: Sys number: Site id: 21 ENE 1/2 -1 Mile Lower 3870 Objectid: 0 0 03101557 3424785.5 3299426.75 PROSPECT CHRISTIAN CHURCH IL3072066 302 EAST EUCLID Not Reported PROSPECT HEIGHTS State code: 60070 Fips cd: Cook Status cd: NC B name: 40 42.08833 -87.92861 3 Township: 11E Section: 21 -SEP -06 W cws num: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported W policy: 0 0 Not Reported Amb well: Not Reported Sdwis well: Not Reported Api: ILEP30000003870 IL WELLS ILEP30000003870 3871 IL 31 A INSTITUTION 42N 27 Not Reported Not Reported 0 Not Reported Not Reported IL WELLS P11109 TC5213454.2s Page A-18 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Well ID: 036487 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: ARNOLD SIMONSON Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000 Depth (in feet): 186 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 25 Plot Location: 8C Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Affidavit Driller: ROSSET F22 West IL WELLS ILSG20000239199 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120310384500 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.935583 Pt latitude: 42.078557 Api number: 120310384500 Longitude : -87.935583 Latitude : 42.078557 Section: 34 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Mt Prospect Vill Farm num: 5 Company name: Geiger, S. B. Co. Status: Water Well Elevation: 676 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 1820 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 E23 NNW IL WELLS ILSG20000240259 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Pt api number: 120313161200 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.928335 Pt latitude: 42.088977 Api number: 120313161200 Longitude : -87.928335 Latitude : 42.088977 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Lutton, Peter Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Snelten, Richard Charles Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 205 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 75 Wfmto: 205 Pumpgpm: 10 E24 NNW IL WELLS ILSG20000240260 1/2 -1 Mile Lower TC5213454.2s Page A-19 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120313180700 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.928335 Pt latitude: 42.088977 Api number: 120313180700 Longitude : -87.928335 Latitude : 42.088977 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Kogan, Irving Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Schwall, John J. Status: Water Well Elevation: 660 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 162 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 115 Wfmto: 162 Pumpgpm: 12 E25 NNW IL WELLS ILSG20000240261 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Pt api number: 120313194900 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.928335 Pt latitude: 42.088977 Api number: 120313194900 Longitude : -87.928335 Latitude : 42.088977 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Kogen, Iry Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Schwall, John J. Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 129 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 115 Wfmto: 129 Pumpgpm: 20 E26 NNW IL WELLS ILSG20000240262 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Pt api number: 120313465000 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.928331 Pt latitude: 42.088979 Api number: 120313465000 Longitude : -87.928331 Latitude : 42.088979 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: S.C.M.B. Inc. Farm num: 2 Company name: Snelten, Jeffrey Status: Water Well Elevation: 662 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 275 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 122 Wfmto: 275 Pumpgpm: 20 TC5213454.2s Page A-20 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation G27 West NW 1/2 -1 Mile 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Higher USGS-IL Formal name: Well ID: 263742 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Monloc type: Owner: PETER WITON Monloc desc: Not Reported Permit: 031-00233-94 Date Drilled: 12/03/1994 Depth (in feet): 205 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 1 E Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Drilled Record Type: Construction Report,Geology feet Driller: SNELTEN Vert coord refsys: F28 West 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-IL Formal name: USGS Illinois Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-420442087560901 Monloc name: 42N 11 E -34.4g 1 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 07120004 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -87.9359022 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Unknown Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19550130 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- 1955-02-10 246.00 Database EDR ID Number IL WELLS P11123 FED USGS USGS40000299980 Not Reported Not Reported 42.0783608 24000 seconds 673 5 US 1822 Not Reported 29 WSW IL WELLS ILEP30000005624 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-21 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Fid: 5624 Objectid: 6703 Area : 0 IL WELLS ILSG20000240256 Perimeter: 0 Well id: 00931 X coord: -87.93581 Pt status: WATER Y coord: 42.07733 Fac name: Not Reported Facility n: Not Reported Addr one t: Not Reported Addr two t: Not Reported City name: Not Reported State code: Not Reported Zip code: Not Reported Fips cd: Not Reported Pm cnty: Not Reported Status cd: Not Reported Fed type c: Not Reported B name: Not Reported Pop cnt: 0 Elevation: 661 Lat dec de: 0 Total depth: 222 Long dec d: 0 Wfmfrom: 90 Meridian: Not Reported Township: Not Reported Range: Not Reported Section: Not Reported Updt ts: Not Reported W cws num: 0311980 W cws name: MOUNT PROSPECT W status: A W suscept: E W policy: C W min setb: 200 W d depth: 149 W aquifer: 5050 Amb well: 0 Pws status: A Sdwis well: WL00931 Sys number: IL0311980 Api: 120310384500 Site id: ILEP30000005624 G30 NW IL WELLS ILSG20000240256 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120313200200 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.930743 Pt latitude: 42.088977 Api number: 120313200200 Longitude : -87.930743 Latitude : 42.088977 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Davis, Glenn Const. Inc. Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Snelton, Gregory Status: Water Well Elevation: 661 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 222 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 90 Wfmto: 222 Pumpgpm: 14 G31 NW IL WELLS ILSG20000240257 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-22 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120313218100 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.930743 IL WELLS P11178 Pt latitude: 42.088977 Api number: 120313218100 Longitude : -87.930743 Second ID: Not Reported Latitude : 42.088977 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Forestwood Homes - Kogen Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Schwall, John J. Status: Water Well Elevation: 664 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 180 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 114 Wfmto: 180 Pumpgpm: 15 G32 NW IL WELLS ILSG20000240258 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120313438000 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.930743 Pt latitude: 42.088977 Api number: 120313438000 Longitude : -87.930743 Latitude : 42.088977 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Sadighi, David Farm num: 2 Company name: Snelten, Jeffrey Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 230 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 110 Wfmto: 230 Pumpgpm: 10 33 WSW IL WELLS P11178 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 213339 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: SPRING -BROOK DEVELOPMENT CORP Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 08/07/1990 Depth (in feet): 97 Aquifer Type: County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 34 Plot Location: Not Reported Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Affidavit Driller: SCHWALL WELL & PUMP 34 SSW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher IL WELLS ILSG20000238461 TC5213454.2s Page A-23 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120312516300 Pt status: ENG Pt longitude: -87.92823 Pt latitude: 42.068936 Api number: 120312516300 Longitude : -87.92823 Latitude : 42.068936 Section: 34 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: U Des Plaines Tun Farm num: B31 Company name: Deleuw Cather & Co Status: Engineering Test Elevation: 660 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 225 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 35 NNW IL WELLS P11124 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036512 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: DAVID WARD Permit: M114019 Date Drilled: 08/11/1984 Depth (in feet): 180 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 1F Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: PI LGARD 36 SW IL WELLS P11180 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 037690 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: METRO SAN DIST #3/MT PROSPECT Permit: M050427 Date Drilled: 07/01/1976 Depth (in feet): 145 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 34 Plot Location: 4D Well Use: IN Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: WEHLING 37 NNW IL WELLS ILSG20000240428 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-24 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120312959200 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.928341 Pt latitude: 42.090804 Api number: 120312959200 Longitude : -87.928341 Latitude : 42.090804 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Ward, David Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Pilgard, Peter Status: Water Well Elevation: 665 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 180 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 120 Wfmto: 180 Pumpgpm: 10 H38 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: Pt longitude: Pt latitude: Api number: Longitude Latitude Section: Tdir: Rdir: Farm num: Status: Elevref: Wformation: Wfmto: H39 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: Pt longitude: Pt latitude: Api number: Longitude Latitude Section: Tdir: Rdir: Farm num: Status: Elevref: Wformation: Wfmto: 120313569900 -87.9337 42.088423 120313569900 -87.9337 42.088423 27 N E Not Reported Water Well Not Reported limestone 180 120312466600 -87.933152 42.088975 120312466600 -87.933152 42.088975 27 N E Not Reported Water Well Not Reported Not Reported 0 Pt status: Twp: Rng: Farm name: Company name: Elevation: Total depth: Wfmfrom: Pumpgpm: Pt status: Twp: Rng: Farm name: Company name: Elevation: Total depth: Wfmfrom: Pumpgpm: IL WELLS WATER 42 11 Mount Nugent Const. Efflandt, Robert 0 180 117 18 IL WELLS WATER 42 11 Nooman W Szymanski, Ted J. 0 150 0 0 ILSG20000240198 ILSG20000240252 TC5213454.2s Page A-25 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation H40 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: Pt longitude: Pt latitude: Api number: Longitude Latitude Section: Tdir: Rdir: Farm num: Status: Elevref: Wformation: Wfmto: H41 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: Pt longitude: Pt latitude: Api number: Longitude Latitude Section: Tdir: Rdir: Farm num: Status: Elevref: Wformation: Wfmto: GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS 120313166400 -87.933152 42.088975 120313166400 -87.933152 42.088975 27 N E Not Reported Water Well Ground level limestone 120 120312808900 -87.933152 42.088975 120312808900 -87.933152 42.088975 27 N E Not Reported Water Well Not Reported limestone 199 Database EDR ID Number IL WELLS ILSG20000240255 Pt status: WATER Twp: 42 Rng: 11 Farm name: Kogan, Irving Company name: Schwall, John J. Elevation: 661 Total depth: 120 Wfmfrom: 116 Pumpgpm: 15 IL WELLS ILSG20000240254 Pt status: WATER Twp: Rng: Farm name: Company name: Elevation: Total depth: Wfmfrom: Pumpgpm: 42 11 Leschyk, Lou Pilgard, Peter 0 199 110 15 H42 NW IL WELLS ILSG20000240253 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120312636300 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.933152 Pt latitude: 42.088975 Api number: 120312636300 Longitude : -87.933152 Latitude : 42.088975 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Roth Alfred Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Not Reported TC5213454.2s Page A-26 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 154 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 143 Site ID: S102945021 NE Groundwater Flow: Not Reported 1/2 - 1 Mile Deep Water Depth: Lower Not Reported Average Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Current Deep Depth: 13 Current Average Depth: Not Reported Current Shallow Depth: 3 Date: 08/1997 44 North 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: Info Source: Owner: Permit: Depth (in feet): County Code: Township: Section: Well Use: Record Type: Driller: 145 NE 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Fid: Area Perimeter: Well id: X coord: Y coord: Fac name: Facility n: Addr one t: Addr two t: City name: Zip code: Pm cnty: Fed type c: Pop cnt: Lat dec de: Long dec d: Meridian: Range: Updt ts: W cws name: W status: W suscept: 036493 Second ID: IL Private Water Wells Survey GERKENBROS Not Reported Date Drilled: 132 Aquifer Type: 031 County: 42N Range: 26 Plot Location: Domestic Well Type: Geology,Any other type of record MOUNT PROSPECT GUTZLER 60056 3750 Objectid: 0 0 03101599 3430076.5 3299557.5 GRACE EVANG LUTHERAN CHURCH IL3072249 1624 EUCLID ROAD Not Reported MOUNT PROSPECT State code: 60056 Fips cd: Cook Status cd: NC B name: 115 42.08833 -87.90917 3 Township: 11E Section: 21 -SEP -06 W cws num: Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported W policy: AQUIFLOW 61913 IL WELLS P11113 Not Reported 00/00/0000 Bedrock COOK 11E 5H 11 IL WELLS ILEP30000003750 3751 IL 31 A INSTITUTION 42N 26 Not Reported Not Reported TC5213454.2s Page A-27 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS W min setb: 0 W d depth: 0 W aquifer: Not Reported Amb well: 0 Pws status: Not Reported Sdwis well: Not Reported Sys number: Not Reported Api: Not Reported Site id: ILEP30000003750 46 SE IL WELLS P11183 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 036526 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: MARIO GAMBINO Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000 Depth (in feet): 130 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 35 Plot Location: 1 C Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Affidavit Driller: JURS 47 SW IL WELLS ILSG20000238629 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120312547800 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.935259 Pt latitude: 42.071776 Api number: 120312547800 Longitude : -87.935259 Latitude : 42.071776 Section: 34 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Mt Prospect City Farm num: 3 Company name: Wehling Well Works Inc. Status: Water Well Elevation: 660 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 145 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 J48 SSW IL WELLS P11179 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-28 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Well ID: 036525 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: ALFRED BUSSE Permit: M005748 Date Drilled: 09/15/1968 Depth (in feet): 146 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 34 Plot Location: 1A Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: PI LGARD K49 NW IL WELLS P11131 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036504 Second ID: 28814 Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: LOUIS HERDEGEN Permit: P002958 Date Drilled: 07/12/1988 Depth (in feet): 198 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 2F Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN K50 NW IL WELLS P11130 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036503 Second ID: 28875 Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: JAMES ESCZUK Permit: P003670 Date Drilled: 07/29/1988 Depth (in feet): 183 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 2F Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN K51 NW IL WELLS P11132 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-29 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Well ID: 235467 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: DAVID LUDWIN LOT Permit: 031-00136-92 Date Drilled: 07/17/1992 Depth (in feet): 198 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 2F Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN L52 NNW IL WELLS P11114 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 036070 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: ROB ROY COUNTRY CLUB #1 Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000 Depth (in feet): 180 Aquifer Type: Not Reported County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 26 Plot Location: 7H Well Use: Commercial Well Type: Record Type: Inventory Driller: Not Reported L53 NNW IL WELLS P11115 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 036071 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: ROB ROY COUNTRY CLUB #2 Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/1929 Depth (in feet): 410 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 26 Plot Location: 7H Well Use: Commercial Well Type: Record Type: Geology,Any other type of record Driller: THORNE M54 NW IL WELLS P11139 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-30 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Well ID: 036508 Second ID: 28089 Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: LOU LESCHYK Permit: M131589 Date Drilled: 05/12/1987 Depth (in feet): 199 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 3E Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: PI LGARD M55 NW IL WELLS P11138 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036502 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: ALFRED ROTH Permit: M079990 Date Drilled: 10/25/1978 Depth (in feet): 154 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 3E Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SZYMANSKI N56 NNW IL WELLS ILSG20000240425 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120312881400 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.930749 Pt latitude: 42.090802 Api number: 120312881400 Longitude : -87.930749 Latitude : 42.090802 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Herdegen, Louis Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Snelten, Richard Charles Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 196 Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 7 N57 NNW IL WELLS ILSG20000240426 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-31 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120312887500 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.930749 1/2 - 1 Mile Deep Water Depth: Pt latitude: 42.090802 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Api number: 120312887500 2.58 Longitude : -87.930749 Current Average Depth: Latitude : 42.090802 Current Shallow Depth: 3.51 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Esczuk, James Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Snelten, Richard Charles Status: Water Well Elevation: 661 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 183 Wformation: rock Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 8 N58 NNW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: Pt longitude: Pt latitude: Api number: Longitude Latitude Section: Tdir: Rdir: Farm num: Status: Elevref: Wformation: Wfmto: 120313063600 -87.930749 42.090802 120313063600 -87.930749 42.090802 27 N E Not Reported Water Well Not Reported limestone 198 159 Site ID: S100531174 NE Groundwater Flow: NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Deep Water Depth: 5.56 Lower Average Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: 2.58 Current Deep Depth: 5.44 Current Average Depth: Not Reported Current Shallow Depth: 3.51 Date: 01/12/1996 60 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Pt status: Twp: Rng: Farm name: Company name: Elevation: Total depth: Wfmfrom: Pumpgpm: IL WELLS WATER ILSG20000240427 42 11 Ludwin, David Snelten, Richard Charles 0 198 60 10 AQUIFLOW 27200 IL WELLS P11111 TC5213454.2s Page A-32 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Well ID: 036491 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: APYRON ENTERPRISES Permit: M058417 Date Drilled: 04/13/1977 Depth (in feet): 192 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 26 Plot Location: 2G Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: PI LGARD N61 NNW IL WELLS P11125 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036499 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: JOHN HOFFMAN Permit: Not Reported Date Drilled: 00/00/0000 Depth (in feet): 114 Aquifer Type: Not Reported County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 1 G Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Affidavit Driller: Not Reported N62 NNW IL WELLS P11126 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036500 Second ID: 28218 Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: JOHN HOFFMAN Permit: M133573 Date Drilled: 07/17/1987 Depth (in feet): 160 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 1 G Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: LIBERG J63 SSW IL WELLS ILSG20000238340 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-33 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120310082500 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.928221 Pt latitude: 42.067117 Api number: 120310082500 Longitude : -87.928221 Latitude : 42.067117 Section: 34 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Busse Alfred Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Pilgard, Peter & Son Status: Water Well Elevation: 662 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 146 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 064 East IL WELLS P11243 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 235479 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: ABDUL ALWAN LOT 62 Permit: 031-00244-92 Date Drilled: 04/07/1993 Depth (in feet): 218 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6H Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: GAFFKE 065 East IL WELLS P11245 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 245329 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: LARRY DUFFY Permit: 031-00260-91 Date Drilled: 11/05/1992 Depth (in feet): 242 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6H Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN 066 East IL WELLS P11244 1/2 -1 Mile Lower TC5213454.2s Page A-34 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Well ID: 245262 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: ABDUL ALWAN Permit: 031-00086-93 Date Drilled: 10/06/1993 Depth (in feet): 220 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6H Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: GAFFKE 067 East IL WELLS P11246 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 262318 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: JOHN BECKER Permit: 031-00060-94 Date Drilled: 08/04/1994 Depth (in feet): 282 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6H Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Drilled Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN 068 East IL WELLS P11242 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 036555 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: R REYENA Permit: M015994 Date Drilled: 03/08/1972 Depth (in feet): 180 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6H Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: PI LGARD P69 East IL WELLS P11241 1/2 -1 Mile Lower TC5213454.2s Page A-35 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Well ID: 217807 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: BETTER SHELTER LOT 158 Permit: 0310004489 Date Drilled: 02/26/1990 Depth (in feet): 260 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6G Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: EFFLANDT P70 East IL WELLS P11240 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 174396 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: PAT LUDVIGSEN Permit: 011043 Date Drilled: 05/05/1989 Depth (in feet): 238 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6G Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN 71 NNW IL WELLS ILSG20000240575 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120312821800 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.929145 Pt latitude: 42.092322 Api number: 120312821800 Longitude : -87.929145 Latitude : 42.092322 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Hoffman, John Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Liberg, Steven Scott Status: Water Well Elevation: 671 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 160 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 115 Wfmto: 160 Pumpgpm: 10 Q72 East IL WELLS P11238 1/2 -1 Mile Lower TC5213454.2s Page A-36 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Well ID: 235336 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: DAN BUSSE LOT 61 Permit: 031-00057-92 Date Drilled: 10/23/1992 Depth (in feet): 242 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6F Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN Q73 East IL WELLS P11239 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 254324 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: JERRY BUSSE Permit: 031-00062-94 Date Drilled: 06/10/1994 Depth (in feet): 240 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6F Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Drilled Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN R74 NW IL WELLS ILSG20000240250 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: 120313111500 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.935561 Pt latitude: 42.088973 Api number: 120313111500 Longitude : -87.935561 Latitude : 42.088973 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Hipelius, John Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Snelten, Richard Charles Status: Water Well Elevation: 674 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 214 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 100 Wfmto: 214 Pumpgpm: 10 R75 NW IL WELLS ILSG20000240251 1/2 -1 Mile Higher TC5213454.2s Page A-37 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120313225100 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.935561 Pt latitude: 42.088973 Api number: 120313225100 Longitude : -87.935561 Latitude : 42.088973 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Levin Associates Architects Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Snelten, Stephen A. Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 200 Wformation: limestone bedrock Wfmfrom: 116 Wfmto: 200 Pumpgpm: 80 76 NE 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Fid: Area Perimeter: Well id: X coord: Y coord: Fac name: Facility n: Addr one t: Addr two t: City name: Zip code: Pm cnty: Fed type c: Pop cnt: Lat dec de: Long dec d: Meridian: Range: Updt ts: W cws name: W status: W suscept: W min setb: W d depth: W aquifer: Pws status: Sys number: Site id: S77 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher 3751 0 0 03105970 3430627.5 3299606 LUCIS IL3118331 1303 N WOLF Not Reported MOUNT PROSPECT 60056 Cook NP 0 42.08833 -87.90694 3 11E 25 -SEP -06 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported 0 0 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported ILEP30000003751 Objectid: State code: Fips cd: Status cd: B name: Township: Section: W cws num: W policy: Amb well: Sdwis well: Api: IL WELLS ILEP30000003751 3752 IL 31 1 RESTAURANT 42N 25 Not Reported Not Reported 0 Not Reported Not Reported IL WELLS ILSG20000240422 TC5213454.2s Page A-38 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Pt api number: 120312547600 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.933158 Pt latitude: 42.0908 Api number: 120312547600 Longitude : -87.933158 Latitude : 42.0908 Section: 27 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Brown Clinton Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Szymanski, Ted J. Status: Water Well Elevation: 664 Elevref: Ground level Total depth: 150 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 S78 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: Pt longitude: Pt latitude: Api number: Longitude Latitude Section: Tdir: Rdir: Farm num: Status: Elevref: Wformation: Wfmto: S79 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Pt api number: Pt longitude: Pt latitude: Api number: Longitude Latitude Section: Tdir: Rdir: Farm num: Status: Elevref: Wformation: Wfmto: 120313022900 -87.933158 42.0908 120313022900 -87.933158 42.0908 27 N E Not Reported Water Well Not Reported rock 150 120313201400 -87.933158 42.0908 120313201400 -87.933158 42.0908 27 N E Not Reported Water Well Not Reported limestone 195 Pt status: Twp: Rng: Farm name: Company name: Elevation: Total depth: Wfmfrom: Pumpgpm: Pt status: Twp: Rng: Farm name: Company name: Elevation: Total depth: Wfmfrom: Pumpgpm: IL WELLS WATER 42 11 Guritz, Elmer G. Efflandt, Herman John 0 150 110 0 IL WELLS WATER 42 11 Mueller, Loretta Snelton, Gregory 0 195 90 10 ILSG20000240423 ILSG20000240424 TC5213454.2s Page A-39 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number R80 NW IL WELLS P11141 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 213330 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: GURITZ Permit: 011832 Date Drilled: 05/22/1989 Depth (in feet): 150 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 3F Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: EFFLANDT R81 NW IL WELLS P11140 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036509 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: CLINTON R BROWN Permit: M048783 Date Drilled: 06/27/1976 Depth (in feet): 150 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 3F Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SZYMANSKI T82 NNE IL WELLS ILSG20000240592 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Pt api number: 120313510300 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.913783 Pt latitude: 42.092558 Api number: 120313510300 Longitude : -87.913783 Latitude : 42.092558 Section: 26 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Dumitru, Marin Farm num: 2 Company name: Snelten, Jeffrey Status: Water Well Elevation: 640 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 285 Wformation: limestone Wfmfrom: 116 Wfmto: 285 Pumpgpm: 10 TC5213454.2s Page A-40 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number T83 IL WELLS ILSG20000239078 NNE IL WELLS ILSG20000240593 1/2 -1 Mile Lower 120312496100 Pt status: WATER Pt api number: 120313511800 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.913783 Pt latitude: 42.092558 Api number: 120313511800 Longitude : -87.913783 Latitude : 42.092558 Twp: 42 Section: 26 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Martinez, Darlene Farm num: Not Reported Company name: Efflandt, Robert Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 300 Wformation: dark gray shale Wfmfrom: 215 Wfmto: 300 Pumpgpm: 9 84 ESE IL WELLS P11237 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Well ID: 245355 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: DAN BUSSE Permit: 031-00056-92 Date Drilled: 03/18/1993 Depth (in feet): 242 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 36 Plot Location: 6E Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN Q85 East IL WELLS ILSG20000239078 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Pt api number: 120312496100 Pt status: WATER Pt longitude: -87.902781 Pt latitude: 42.077035 Api number: 120312496100 Longitude : -87.902781 Latitude : 42.077035 Section: 36 Twp: 42 Tdir: N Rng: 11 Rdir: E Farm name: Moe William Farm num: Not Reported Company name: K & K Well Drilling TC5213454.2s Page A-41 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Status: Water Well Elevation: 0 Elevref: Not Reported Total depth: 220 Wformation: Not Reported Wfmfrom: 0 Wfmto: 0 Pumpgpm: 0 S86 Owner: HAROLD GILLESPIE NW Permit: N011348 Date Drilled: 1/2 - 1 Mile 167 Aquifer Type: County Code: Higher County: Township: 42N Well ID: 036506 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Well Type: Record Type: Owner: W NOOMAN Driller: SNELTEN Permit: M027028 Date Drilled: 01/11/1974 Depth (in feet): 150 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 2G Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SZYMANSKI S87 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036505 Second ID: Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: HAROLD GILLESPIE Permit: N011348 Date Drilled: Depth (in feet): 167 Aquifer Type: County Code: 031 County: Township: 42N Range: Section: 27 Plot Location: Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN S88 NW 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Well ID: 036515 Second ID: Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Owner: GODFREY SULLIVAN Permit: M114035 Date Drilled: Depth (in feet): 179 Aquifer Type: County Code: 031 County: Township: 42N Range: Section: 27 Plot Location: Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: PI LGARD Not Reported 06/28/1971 Bedrock COOK 11E 2G 11 Not Reported 08/12/1984 Bedrock COOK 11E 2G 11 IL WELLS P11134 IL WELLS P11133 IL WELLS P11135 TC5213454.2s Page A-42 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation S89 Site ID: S102945021 NE NW Not Reported 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Deep Water Depth: 1/2 -1 Mile Average Water Depth: Not Reported Higher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Well ID: 235229 Second ID: Not Reported Info Source: IL Private Water Wells Survey Current Shallow Depth: 3 Owner: BRAD VALLEM LOT 11 08/1997 2G Permit: 031-00066-92 Date Drilled: 04/20/1992 Depth (in feet): 198 Aquifer Type: Bedrock County Code: 031 County: COOK Township: 42N Range: 11E Section: 27 Plot Location: 2G Well Use: Domestic Well Type: Record Type: Construction Report,Geology Driller: SNELTEN 1G Site ID: S102945021 NE Groundwater Flow: Not Reported 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Current Deep Depth: 13 Current Average Depth: Not Reported Current Shallow Depth: 3 Date: 08/1997 2G Site ID: S100531174 NE Groundwater Flow: NE 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Deep Water Depth: 5.56 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: 2.58 Current Deep Depth: 5.44 Current Average Depth: Not Reported Current Shallow Depth: 3.51 Date: 01/12/1996 Database EDR ID Number IL WELLS P11136 AQUIFLOW 61913 AQUIFLOW 27200 TC5213454.2s Page A-43 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: IL Radon Radon Test Results Zipcode Result 60056 1.6 60056 0.8 60056 5 60056 2.2 60056 1.6 60056 3.5 60056 2.8 60056 10.7 60056 0.5 60056 1 60056 2.4 60056 1.9 60056 1.2 60056 3.7 60056 0.8 60056 1.2 60056 1.8 60056 1.3 60056 3 60056 1.3 60056 2.1 60056 1.1 60056 1.3 60056 3.5 60056 8.2 60056 0.7 60056 9.8 60056 2.3 60056 1.4 60056 2.2 60056 13.4 60056 3.1 Federal EPA Radon Zone for COOK County: 2 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 60056 Number of sites tested: 3 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Living Area - 1 st Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement 2.567 pCi/L 100% 0% 0% TC5213454.2s Page A-44 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Illinois State Geological Survey Telephone: 217-333-4747 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQU[FLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5213454.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Records Source: Illinois Geological Survey Telephone: 217-333-4747 Illinois Private Well Database and PICS (Public, Industrial, Commercial Survey) Source: Illinois State Water Survey Telephone: 217-333-9043 WaterWell Location Information Source: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 217-782-0810 OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION RADON State Database: IL Radon Source: Department of Nuclear Safety Telephone: 217-785-9958 County Radon Results Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey TC5213454.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5213454.2s Page PSGR-3 APPENDIX E Records of Communication Records for the property are available for review at the Mount Prospect Village Hall. APPENDIX F Environmental Lien Search Report Advanced Searches Environmental Information Specialists ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH (Environmental Liens, Environmental Restrictions on Current Deed, Activity & Use Limitations, Illinois and United States Environmental Protection Agency Documents, Environmental Disclosures) File Number: L6-5276 Property Address: 799 Biermann Court, Mount Prospect, Illinois Permanent Index Number: 0335 104 006 Search Date: March 13, 2018 BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2 IN KENSINGTON CENTER RESUBDIVISION IV OF LOTS 2 & 3 IN KENSINGTON CENTER PHASE 2 IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. DOCUMENT GRANTOR GRANTEE INSTRUMENT DATE RECORDED 1123012068 John Handcock Life Insurance Gemstone Mt. Prospect Industial WD 8-18-11 Company LLC No Environmental Liens were found on this property. No deed restrictions were found on this property. This search meets or exceeds the standards set forth by AAI and ASTM 1527-13. This search is of the land described herein by the property index number or a street address furnished by the applicant. Advanced Searches assumes no liability for the accuracy of the property index number or street address so furnished. Furthermore, this search is not a title insurance policy, guarantee, or opinion of title and should not be used as such. This search is of all said properly posted recorded documents in the recorder of deeds office in the county of the described property. While Advanced Searches takes utmost care in recording accurate data, it assumes no liability of mis-posted documents, documents posted to other associated permanent index numbers, or in the accuracy of public recorded property data. AUL=activity & use limitation D=deed DinT=deed in trust ED=environmental disclosure EL=environmental lien ExD=executor's deed QC=quit claim ShD=sheriff's deed TsD=trustee's deed WD=warranty deed Prepared By Advanced Searches • 6026 South Lake Shore Drive • Cary, Illinois 60013 Phone: 847.921.1022 www.advanced-searches.com 2 File Number: APPENDIX G Fire insurance Maps Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Inquiry Number: 5213454.3 March 09, 2018 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor CEDRF Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Certified Sanborn® Mao Resort Site Name: Proposed Mount Prospect Poli( 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 EDR Inquiry # 5213454.3 Client Name: True North Consultants, Inc. 1240 Iroquois Avenue Naperville, IL 60563 Contact: Lauren Trzaskus 03/09/18 The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by True North Consultants, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Certification # 2792-41 BB -8437 PO # T118149 Project Proposed Police Station UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Certification #: 2792-41 BB -B437 The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress ►" University Publications of America ►r EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866TM True North Consultants, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as leqal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5213454 - 3 page 2 APPENDIX H City Directories Report Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Inquiry Number: 5213454.5 March 14, 2018 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 (CEDWEnvironmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images TABLE OF CONTENTS Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. Data by infoUSA CopyrightCC,2008 All Rights Reserved RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2014 Q Q EDR Digital Archive 2010 Q Q EDR Digital Archive 2005 Q Q EDR Digital Archive 2000 Q Q EDR Digital Archive 1995 Q Q EDR Digital Archive 1992 Q Q EDR Digital Archive 1987 Q Q EDR Digital Archive 1982 E] Q Haines Criss -Cross Directory 1978 E] F1 Haines Criss -Cross Directory 5213454-5 Pagel FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Year CD Image Source BIERMANN CT 2014 pg Al EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg A3 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg A5 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg A7 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg A9 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg All EDR Digital Archive 1987 pg A13 EDR Digital Archive 1982 Haines Criss -Cross Directory 1978 Haines Criss -Cross Directory Street not listed in Source Street not listed in Source 5213454-5 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS Year CD Image Source E BUSINESS CENTER DR 2014 pg. A2 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg. A4 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg. A6 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg. A8 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg. A10 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg. Al2 EDR Digital Archive 1987 pg. A14 EDR Digital Archive 1982 pg. A15 Haines Criss -Cross Directory 1978 Haines Criss -Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 5213454-5 Page 3 City Directory Images Target Street Cross Street Source ve, - EDR Digital Archive BIERMANN CT 2014 799 ADVOCATE PRINT SHOP LUTHERAN GENERAL PRINTING SVCS 800 CAREMARK ILLINOIS SPECIALTY PH CAREMARK RX INC DANA E MORRISON JR CO EIGHT HUNDRED BIERMANN LLC GIDI HOLDINGS INC 5213454.5 Page: Al Target Street Cross Street E BUSINESS CENTER DR 700 ACTAVIS INC PFIZER INC 800 CORELINK DATA CENTERS LLC TALKPOINT COMMUNICATIONS 801 GOODWIN PRODUCTS SCHUMACHER ELECTRIC CORP SCHUMBACHER RACING CORP 901 GAM ENTERPRISES INC GAM GEAR LLC GAM MED MV PRODUCTS LLC 950 SCHNEIDER ELC BUILDINGS LLC 1001 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC CARBIDE INC 1100 C LINE PRODUCTS INC PREWARDS LIMITED 1200 RJC LABORATORIES LLC WESTERN MEDICAL CORPORATION XTTRIUM LABORATORIES INC 1221 CYBER WRKPLACE RCVERY SVCS LLC GREENWICH HOTEL RESTAURANT LLC TDK MEDICAL Source EDR Digital Archive 2014 5213454.5 Page: A2 Target Street Cross Street Source ve, - EDR Digital Archive BIERMANN CT 2010 799 LUTHERAN GENERAL PRINTING SVCS 800 CAREMARK ILLINOIS SPECIALTY PH CAREMARK RX LLC DANA E MORRISON JR CO EIGHT HUNDRED BIERMANN LLC GIDI HOLDINGS INC 5213454.5 Page: A3 Target Street Cross Street E BUSINESS CENTER DR 700 WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS INC 800 CORELINK DATA CENTERS LLC 801 DSP CORPORATION Source EDR Digital Archive 2010 5213454.5 Page: A4 GOODWIN PRODUCTS SCHUMACHER ELECTRIC CORP SCHUMBACHER RACING CORP 901 GAM ENTERPRISES INC GAM GEAR LLC GAM MED MV PRODUCTS LLC 1000 CAPITAL GROUP PARTNERS INC 1001 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC CARBIDE INC 1050 RYLAN DER COMPANY TECHNOTRANS AMERICA INC 1100 C LINE PRODUCTS INC PREWARDS LIMITED 1200 BANG & OLUFSEN PALLADIUM AT CI XTTRIUM LABORATORIES INC Source EDR Digital Archive 2010 5213454.5 Page: A4 Target Street Cross Street Source ve, - EDR Digital Archive BIERMANN CT 2005 799 ADVOCATE HEALTH & HOSPITALS AMADA AMERICA INC 800 AUTHENTIC BRANDS INC BIGSTON CORPORATION U S A CAREMARK RX INC DANA E MORRISON JR CO GIDI HOLDINGS INC 5213454.5 Page: A5 Target Street Cross Street E BUSINESS CENTER DR 700 WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS INC 800 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Source EDR Digital Archive 2005 5213454.5 Page: A6 LONG LE 801 GOODWIN PRODUCTS SCHUMACHER ELECTRIC CORP SCHUMBACHER RACING CORP 901 SAATI AMERICAN CORP 950 INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC 1000 CAPITAL GROUP PARTNERS INC 1001 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC CARBIDE INC 1050 RYLANDER COMPANY 1100 C -LINE PRODUCTS INC NORTH SHORE BENEFITS GROUP 1200 BANG & OLUFSEN PALLADIUM AT CI NORTHFIELD LABORATORIES INC 1221 CABOT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES TDK CORPORATION OF AMERICA Source EDR Digital Archive 2005 5213454.5 Page: A6 Target Street Cross Street Source ve, - EDR Digital Archive BIERMANN CT 2000 799 ADVOCATE HEALTH & HOSPITALS AMADA ENGINEERING & SERVICE CO 800 BIGSTON CORPORATION U S A 5213454.5 Page: A7 Target Street Cross Street E BUSINESS CENTER DR 800 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 801 SCHUMACHER ELECTRIC CORP 901 MAJESTECH CORPORATION 950 BARBER, COLMAN BARBER-COLMAN HOLDINGS (DEL) INVENSYS BUILDING SYSTEMS INC ROBERTSHAW HOLDINGS CORP 1000 OUTPUT TECHNOLOGIES OF ILL 1001 FRANCIS, J SUMITOMO ELECTRIC CARBIDE INC 1050 RYLANDER COMPANY THE 1100 C -LINE PRODUCTS INC 1200 NORTHFIELD LABORATORIES INC Source EDR Digital Archive 2000 5213454.5 Page: A8 Target Street Cross Street Source ve, - EDR Digital Archive BIERMANN CT 1995 799 STEWART, WARNER 800 MITSUBISHI ELECTRONICS AMERICA 5213454.5 Page: A9 Target Street Cross Street E BUSINESS CENTER DR 700 SEARLE G D & CO (DEL) 800 MITSUBISHI ELC INDUS CONTRLS Source EDR Digital Archive 1995 5213454.5 Page: A10 SUZUKI, K 801 NEOVEX CORPORATION RANDHAVA BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP XYTEL CORPORATION 901 MAJESTECH CORPORATION 950 BARBER-COLMAN COMPANY (DEL) BARBER-COLMAN HOLDINGS (DEL) COLEMAN,BARBER ROBERTSHAW HOLDINGS CORP 1000 OUTPUT TECHNOLOGIES OF ILL 1001 ASAI, T SUMITOMO ELECTRIC CARBIDE INC 1050 MARKETING INDUSTRIES DEL RYLANDER COMPANY THE 1100 AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY 1200 N G K SPARK PLUGS USA INC NORTHFIELD LABORATORIES INC NTK CUTTING TOOLS 1221 FINCHER, DENISE J GTE DIRECTORIES CORPORATION Source EDR Digital Archive 1995 5213454.5 Page: A10 Target Street Cross Street Source ve, - EDR Digital Archive BIERMANN CT 1992 799 ALEMITE CORPORATION PATTERSON DENTAL COMPANY DEL STEWART, WARNER STEWART-WARNER CORPORATION 800 BIGSTON CORPORATION USA MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC AMERICA 5213454.5 Page: A11 Target Street Cross Street E BUSINESS CENTER DR 700 SEARLE G D & CO 800 MITSUBISHI ELC INDUS CONTRLS 801 RANDHAVA BROTHERS PARTNERSHIP Source EDR Digital Archive 1992 5213454.5 Page: Al2 XYTEL BECHTEL INC XYTEL CORPORATION 901 MAJESTECH CORPORATION 1000 OUTPUT TECHNOLOGIES OF ILL 1001 SUMITOMO ELECTRIC CARBIDE INC 1050 MARKETING INDUSTRIES DEL RYLANDER CO THE 1100 AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY 1200 BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION JST CORPORATION N G K SPARK PLUGS USA INC NORTHFIELD LABORATORIES INC UNIVERSITY OF CHG HOSPITALS 1221 GTE DIRECTORIES CORPORATION Source EDR Digital Archive 1992 5213454.5 Page: Al2 Target Street Cross Street Source ve, - EDR Digital Archive BIERMANN CT 1987 800 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC SALES AMER MITSUBISHI ELECTRONICS AMER* 5213454.5 Page: A13 Target Street Cross Street Source V, EDR Digital Archive E BUSINESS CENTER DR 1987 700 SEARLE G D & CO* 800 JOSTENS INC 801 XYTEL CORPORATION 900 MITSUBISHI ELECTRONICS AMER* 901 SUMIDEN CARBIDE AMERICA INC 1100 AMERICAN CYANAMID CO AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY INC 1200 BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORP 5213454.5 Page: A14 Target Street Cross Street E BUSINESS CENTER DR Source Haines Criss -Cross Directory 1982 600513 M0_ UNT PROSPECT 5213454.5 Page: A15 MIDWESIME,LTV EXCH 635-7170*2' MIDE Ot DG MWlr N NC 291-61" *2 410 F'ESE &ACH ORM lMT%L 635-7330+2 411 RAIJEN HORST C 1100RAT $24 - 44 A 4 -# 2 41 1 - MjkCK GE CG P4M- 635-ISS5 42 it 714 ZITTLER SOFTWARE 827-9260-66 2 620 UNITED ROU F0ftjlNG 63 5- 0400 1 100 CWTV 63S-9sm 2 OWN U4L OFC 63 S - YO'SC 4 2 lip 9 Bus 0 PES P41 w 5213454.5 Page: A15 APPENDIX I Historical Aerial Photographs Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Inquiry Number: 5213454.9 March 09, 2018 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 (rEDR Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 03/09/18 Site Name: Proposed Mount Prospect Poli( 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 EDR Inquiry # 5213454.9 Client Name: True North Consultants, Inc. 1240 Iroquois Avenue Naperville, IL 60563 Contact: Lauren Trzaskus CEDW Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source 2015 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2015 USDA/NAIP 2012 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2006 1 "=500' Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 1998 1 "=500' Acquisition Date: April 17, 1998 USGS/DOQQ 1993 1 "=500' Flight Date: April 17, 1993 USGS 1988 1 "=500' Flight Date: April 12, 1988 USGS 1981 1 "=500' Flight Date: November 07, 1981 USGS 1974 1 "=500' Flight Date: October 10, 1974 USDA 1972 1 "=500' Flight Date: October 26, 1972 USGS 1967 1 "=500' Flight Date: September 25, 1967 USDA 1962 1 "=500' Flight Date: April 03, 1962 USGS 1955 1 "=500' Flight Date: November 24, 1955 USGS 1951 1 "=500' Flight Date: December 13, 1951 USGS 1938 1 "=500' Flight Date: November 20, 1938 ILGS When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5213454 - 9 page 2 sk. Ago #rlt- 1w 4k Ilk -4: 04 u • sip 4t2 1� IPI Ot 7c N Ar rl 1�0 Pro, JlW ir pti. M-WOT-96 Its ;to YA Cat t4 AlLobel - i. I w i- , "- _ 1 k Fiji �r�, Wit` I'!p•� 'a � -� • � jw ` '� � �/" � dr -07 br TI 744 -yC Lr r w 1 �� � ems'"r +fV i �'�'T '�J'lT�, a"�i■r* • r 4 , e � � r • tf • .!_ c • r s N -er•ir s c6 ' NQEJ4RY #: 5213454.9 YEAR: 2012 t r � ! Jr � • f Pet ,, •� � � . L . ■ � Y ti ' + d � ] �� CEDR p - ff = 500' r� r, .. . `{ 4L �,�. ,,� � ff.-- 0 Ow Ono* 411p - •Ike 46 41W v. 79 1 +� .�t . -,.• - - 'tel � � ��" �,'�" .���� , �- _, .,� lb IVA 9 Ar r #.10vvede ` it i i a1 • + '� ,! �. ,�Moto let O f 's f 4 r 4 e • A.- 7 r 4r J6. ik I :ff1 . . A , A ." , " 'I"'r %* If OAT ar1qprr:wr *rye woo tv,.4 mo 4 66 24 lot 0�0 all. law 44 -of I AT A -,amp Join 1w AL IL 4 - fetp IL wool YTL 1,110 40 ju iffX M, 40 A • n 77 IP Ilk Vol,* Alf- law • ■���� � �'��_��� "yam r� �~ � s. {� n •. `���,'�l �.� �� `.. it r���■■ a. ,� +4F ! r r at i + IL 4_ r 1p INQUIRY #:5213454.9 YEAR: 1972 = 500' 12,,.� s+':, f,,. +.+2 y.- • �4-dip, , 'dX..E$A Ax .-.t. t �- � dy� � �� ^•^"r �„� .. d.. �� #arl Ing' j Ise .. °•��.-_ # �' ! salr ° �� y.x'• t� � fry5� ��" �� 4 } •...1 m ^ fl� �' 'rte .�. •-° > r T` r-'-�` b+. s5 *lq'C ! r qk��F A. do 3th.44 l { • o/{,a'�. - l�e �_ qui '�, ✓^✓` it a.S - - gyya - yy AN 4. J, 2 R _ u ns 31a it—'��s,3ie.^" r k L > 4r >r Q� pav� k'4e��,� • � :,.4.5 ,# a At°'-. �/' .,Ili ..�. .. •'� s'sL t�la.;� INQUIRY #:5213454.9 YEAR: 1972 = 500' r � . . EPP r INQUIRY M5213454.9 N YEAR: 1967 sur 500 eEDR lc_- I L a.' IF a -Al i� �. - � �"" 1 , T 33f ii - �� _ fit, \, � v{1 �:� -� i _ _-- ,<_V�� , -� -A6 = S: i INQUIRY #:5213454.9 i N YEAR: 1938 = 500' E[3R low R • 1 � y �Sl INQUIRY #:5213454.9 i N YEAR: 1938 = 500' E[3R APPENDIX J Historical Topographic Maps Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Inquiry Number: 5213454.4 March 09, 2018 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 (rEDR Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com EDR Historical Topo Map Report Site Name: Proposed Mount Prospect Poli( 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 EDR Inquiry # 5213454.4 Client Name: True North Consultants, Inc. 1240 Iroquois Avenue Naperville, IL 60563 Contact: Lauren Trzaskus 03/09/18 CEDFU EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by True North Consultants, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. EDR's Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. Search Results: Coordinates: P.O.# T118149 Latitude: Project: Proposed Police Station Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters UTM Y Meters Elevation: Maps Provided: 2012 1927 1995 1900 1993 1980 1972 1963 1953 1946 42.07968 42° 4'47" North -87.921639 -87° 55' 18" West Zone 16 North 423767.00 4659033.98 656.70' above sea level Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WTHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5213454 - 4 page 2 Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 2012 Source Sheets Arlington Heights 2012 7.5 -minute, 24000 1995 Source Sheets Arlington Heights 1995 7.5 -minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1993 1993 Source Sheets 0 Arlington Heights 1993 7.5 -minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1988 1980 Source Sheets Arlington Heights 1980 7.5 -minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1978 5213454 - 4 page 3 Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 1972 Source Sheets Arlington Heights 1972 7.5 -minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1972 1963 Source Sheets Arlington Heights 1963 7.5 -minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1963 1953 Source Sheets Arlington Heights 1953 7.5 -minute, 24000 1946 Source Sheets Arlington Heights 1946 7.5 -minute, 24000 5213454 - 4 page 4 Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 1927 Source Sheets Arlington Heights 1927 7.5 -minute, 24000 1900 Source Sheets Highwood 1900 15 -minute, 62500 5213454 - 4 page 5 CEDW Historical Topo Map 21 U 'y DORSFTST U W DL1VE AVE ww 0 W-EUCUR AVE h5 CE'fil� I�i°I �.`�10, �c �0r'� Xrn: _ 0 0 AZ va �. IIS j !'�z FIV MEMORY LN�1 I� 7F, i! Christiam i l 1iLL y J LL � z df y -i This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 2012, 7.5 -minute f WW(LLOWAD � �-'v;l � E_SEMINOLELN NN LNLU J7l 2 lI ` 2 LU cc, 2 iJ CLAIRE JL (W l 4 til¢ Q LL f a 7 4 g ¢ Q ¢ Z 7E430 CT ' o Q ti ¢ p v Q E MAYA LN I z 2 N DNEF YU A LN ¢ \ o EE W� . \ • F e a �(-.AfiIBLN o TANO�� m LN �I C _ � LID A(Y�E BFB% FCFDAR LN •�\ AZALFA IN E �'® D P\', E K1OWA L M QtyVJ0 D DR w 0 ]� kfFNS1NGT0 RD r —{- E � I� o hV �ENp VILI DE ffO '�' � Forest F�iVer NlLL ST Ditch. 45 41V F GREGO`RYAVE - E'LOWDENIN �_4Yy4F� - ❑ z� w�9 I Sai CC z-� Ma cr ZW,I MAVE Z (vrARK AVE 0 9 g ILID-, L -4 I,E CENTRAL RD� ),1)1'ERE LN I I T� I¢ All n z 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 6 (EEDR® Historical Topo Map 1C wROW PAR F, James III IN KIN, 11111 let' Apill - 22, M1 1 103213_ 1W 111MIRNME lit IM ► �- I This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1995, 7.5 -minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 7 (EEDR® Historical Topo Map 19 C, er y y see I �l> Q t.! 2 569 2.�: • T 24 W Op-r q'Ik ,tvc 1d A r, , aa.fails ton\0 r ar kLions p O PE T\; Park i _.._ . qp ��e_•_�r•a1 j% CAMP Golf Course 0-fi na,. \ wnoo u .�qtj 00 e ,! I I ) _ _ (`� v. \\''+1 Gro ,01 & '. � - Woodlan�Trail i sab C r nq 4 I Par m L Gaiourseto 1 \ °�` / ■Park .1 an2nre 26 I a 1 � ,1. 1 f ?5___ Ilk r1-9 P�M. 01, a. - F7A 1 ON I 11 f-, 1, 1 � 1111�1lA9 I1 1114it bONFA ffs' �llQdl� � 1111 millilE 2 Ot ONE 9 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1993, 7.5 -minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 8 (EEDR® Historical Topo Map1 ggC LITH PAR WAY , , ( SCh flA 7 Q J. 2? . rl �65] °lo, j:. - �' �� t J`.:' 2 1 - U h1 �-_ _ _ � Ll VE _'AYE. .—. 11 1 i , ® : • C 6` i Hehfs a -� r 67 � LSh ppinS ` -"+- CAMP f Mc DON n a S`ta ; ; flA ••• 1 cam✓ - 6� 4 enter 660 Rob Roy ' • •'1' B I` �_ • �—�� Golf Club •� . ai Drchj�l/' GOLF COURSE ;j ti 1 ..�—I. G If ' f LJ`� iMs IL LANE 26 LI cAVE • ARDENS�1 I p Q 1 WT; .. yr + Randhur�t Euclid RY 3 . �5-nter I Bch R<�� 1 I I PPin6l i oRIn r 1� — �I 17I _—� ,. f . • . �+ r, r ' !-- � ---- �. .. 4M ROAD � ttnctlle 1 50 VI . 1 .�. . , e. • - - --Il ✓=ORY UN Frtre}l $�h� � II r p 658 �l ProaPdc� _ Imo: a •. y,, ` + ° r r Athlete C-' 4 Drrcy 1 • - 1, �Fleld n c I " na Y LANF JLOR ! \ O �■ 5�., �. Sr JLre h= .. .F �J 650 ; L 4 J- 1�h I IWT-�St Ma vs - r M'" k" ISASLLLA lay, Rl4_l 3 rH4Y _4 3_ a I� Mt P�s—Peet r 2 U --� Shopping Center• St Paul Cem a ^� •.. I U T,y 'A rrF,�tisr E BucsA Sch r as � T �J!�l r1� 1 P7tw -A—ROSPECT L' 1 CE tRAL 65B 'R I f I F`lqla.tvul I 1 3-1. LI ! s r; Elm 655• h 'Sfai t i'I -•i _ AVE�L J �L_`- 1 11 Jwen Park — = I'E`•• r I VE qR N L. - ; A VE W U �F�� w7 f W.. LIP i M.ILgURN R ('" O rW,L&URN Av+= O �M� •• e _ _. R e 7 'vF4meSt it:yngnd sch is1211 D GO 11A14Ul3 - :TEST NE % i.=- z Te RAC L nlns Park — — , "%S in II_ I — • IHnly 7 -Fp -", ll Lia k n i�R f._ 1.—wa c9 i... FOREST ,1 }-I 7 -FJ -", r SC I ="lf / 1 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1980, 7.5 -minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 9 CEDR® Historical Topo Map 972 q tv£ 4VE rd 7r - II\r ,ft, I ��,1 1 1 F ICAMP �MC.DOMn ��� _ _ sSta Pi _• - [ eao . Rob Roy 11 Golf Club �I r til h -- • E UCUD 1 L .. .... I�.-Av.E.T...:.r LANE ARO I5 '`WT Randhurst ldC�eAR RY Center -.•'- ..,.... .-.. •- . - v-r •: �l_ - �� I 1 I — p0 Sha pp� t4 i ..J ��,�� 0 -w R I� - �r- I I j :. :..- • ,� Ing' I . 2� r JI- yy {IR _Iv CenterJ��O, N.,�, •'r! I f1 t ]+ROMw000 - ..Ferhalnilir .r, 7�- ' „ -- U. RV _ •h' _ BM ROAD - --- - - 5 1 _H,til tick — r ..... . �.. y,. �.. r•- I 11 �- - ' S;, �; I �I: W _ ` HiCiffLAND `WT W F S t •• - .. _ MEMO _ _ LANE 650 - a r,REGCikv a I 1 -- ti.sr1i� I L— 35-.- _ - _ t 1111 '•:'.: yFalrviww i� lsch " 1 ..J. 36St MarY5 JU , I ll fSA�EL LA f._ ly rn • • '-, .. 'S r Ji� (//��y r4AYeR 1 I ' s7. Mt Prospect + 1 Maryville WT �n H q EIRr _t Paul Cem sr g pp H u; Q ShaIn Center A burse $rh St Em';I Sch �r ROSPECT CENTRAL 658 '� r f -, _�1 ��', . tt'pnteal ' . •* • • • r1'. til'll I— 1� ,AVE. •15t Paul SCh 'V1T o Z Aver. Pzrk�' _ ... ErN �vRr,REw ; Avt I LII rte. i- S'. } yr v` NSI 3 - h N h n. '''HAR✓ARD ST - --� � M, F,I N Q Q ¢ 4 `� - O MIL11URN AVE O 57 rr L•u.,In AVE ISRiynjDnd p'�IM1 _ 7. I Srli ST sr I rel f'♦aygl04nd W� . } I , s v 8 rr , -,JwANDt I-. TERPAcE .,,,, Park cl --: _Ji ,,STONE. . r 1pinp� Q I F#ofy d q Lr lejfiP rk >t CenDRAKE sr •_--Cfiippewa 1 FOREtiT �I FiG F1Lt -IL TERRACE *a SW This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1972, 7.5 -minute SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 10 PeLmSh4pin �r - -_6ba .Center _-- rd 7r - II\r ,ft, I ��,1 1 1 F ICAMP �MC.DOMn ��� _ _ sSta Pi _• - [ eao . Rob Roy 11 Golf Club �I r til h -- • E UCUD 1 L .. .... I�.-Av.E.T...:.r LANE ARO I5 '`WT Randhurst ldC�eAR RY Center -.•'- ..,.... .-.. •- . - v-r •: �l_ - �� I 1 I — p0 Sha pp� t4 i ..J ��,�� 0 -w R I� - �r- I I j :. :..- • ,� Ing' I . 2� r JI- yy {IR _Iv CenterJ��O, N.,�, •'r! I f1 t ]+ROMw000 - ..Ferhalnilir .r, 7�- ' „ -- U. RV _ •h' _ BM ROAD - --- - - 5 1 _H,til tick — r ..... . �.. y,. �.. r•- I 11 �- - ' S;, �; I �I: W _ ` HiCiffLAND `WT W F S t •• - .. _ MEMO _ _ LANE 650 - a r,REGCikv a I 1 -- ti.sr1i� I L— 35-.- _ - _ t 1111 '•:'.: yFalrviww i� lsch " 1 ..J. 36St MarY5 JU , I ll fSA�EL LA f._ ly rn • • '-, .. 'S r Ji� (//��y r4AYeR 1 I ' s7. Mt Prospect + 1 Maryville WT �n H q EIRr _t Paul Cem sr g pp H u; Q ShaIn Center A burse $rh St Em';I Sch �r ROSPECT CENTRAL 658 '� r f -, _�1 ��', . tt'pnteal ' . •* • • • r1'. til'll I— 1� ,AVE. •15t Paul SCh 'V1T o Z Aver. Pzrk�' _ ... ErN �vRr,REw ; Avt I LII rte. i- S'. } yr v` NSI 3 - h N h n. '''HAR✓ARD ST - --� � M, F,I N Q Q ¢ 4 `� - O MIL11URN AVE O 57 rr L•u.,In AVE ISRiynjDnd p'�IM1 _ 7. I Srli ST sr I rel f'♦aygl04nd W� . } I , s v 8 rr , -,JwANDt I-. TERPAcE .,,,, Park cl --: _Ji ,,STONE. . r 1pinp� Q I F#ofy d q Lr lejfiP rk >t CenDRAKE sr •_--Cfiippewa 1 FOREtiT �I FiG F1Lt -IL TERRACE *a SW This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1972, 7.5 -minute SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 10 SDR® Historical Topo Map 1963 .. CIA1 r� I, f 65� 1i 1 1 3b'�i _—_\�_Lj 17 hl of LAI i x l I �` ■-� .. /I trul I ■ s • •• Hh ...... PPinB CAfK�. a i g Stat , Repo ••••• ' i O jam— 668 ter r s r -. _.� • ^- ^..,. II Rob Roy p• Golf Club 12chard�g . ...- [ —'' . �. W \ P I !o IL ♦2 FJ' - 1- 'LANe EL96IA AVF_" AN'D i '1yy Pandhur Eunliei- BA Y k ` _ •v kV o Sh oppinA 'enter b en hWT ,I r Feehan1 lie Ha' --- -- �_ �� BM ROAD -. 67 655 I / 58 ._. •r• ra, n r{et I J 0 17- Ll e se z eu N 4_r Y ITCH A hl H t eti I' Field �, � rri ti ^ f4,24 - - � . � I � � - R 856 � .\ .. _•o �.. W T. O .: k • / _`6 l ry$ :.r �]) N --Mt ProBpec �'` ---- -b i He WT Shopping Cente I J- WY r E I sT til h:cnVit f �I r e •,' ._ b f , � a ' , n - e ' VF R N� � V � W •• '_ �� _ N r = t Lincoln f Vfr -•a Snd Seh Be As7Y NE - r Lion rk- �.� - 2 - �S. j� �.. "i. - !Holy kC, n GR K _ FOREST P H f This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1963, 7.5 -minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 1! N• 5213454 - 4 page 11 CEDR' Historical Topo Map g U � Ra a L", ` 2' \ c . 24 r T h 1 - «( Rcb Roy ° _� 51 l 675 , Goli Cob ' Or, rd U -- ' 6410. \J EU 1 7;-'AVi`V ��.._ i---/ 25. . ens Cpm �.... �_._•,. l2 •• ONS � � -J ��i.� �-i'�@�!BiIVi f 7.1 {\ 676' 78• . - - 649 .� 5p .... .,. 675 I © � -.._,�►� • o .. iso _ - 1-�`l , BRE 6 `6 `,'. i / rte` © Y\� �f. • '° PC it CIA, , 0 $t Ma - Gem I 1 - i a 101 < �� 659 C N7R L c M ' RD!01 ia1'° E t iC� - 655 I 6 43 k.L N I I twLU W o e - , ° - � ' � r----- T \ ' I I This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1953, 7.5 -minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 12 Historical Topo Map 1946 This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1946, 7.5 -minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 5213454 - 4 page 13 6 613q [ 2 678 er O 1, _ 67 CAMP 66 .41G ON 6/ `-' �!! R D r � 76\ ' •.. ...d...�...� f P e 27 i r f U I f'OUNDRY 678 -�.J �,6 ROAD 6 7 ' ! �u 650 `lam 47 0 649 !! i �• so �i r.-�• 39 10(::7'� 0 3 , I- $T MA R XS SCHO 6: - . ........., l ...... ... - 59. ............ .. .... w 5 R ' f M' ssp 65 ' cr% r12 / This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1946, 7.5 -minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 5213454 - 4 page 13 CEDR' Historical Topo Map This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Arlington Heights, 1927, 7.5 -minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 14 CEDR® Historical Topo Map g, This report includes information from the following map sheet(s). NW N NE TP, Highwood, 1900, 15 -minute -A dX r 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 SITE NAME: Proposed Mount Prospect Police Station ADDRESS: 799 Bierman Court Mount Prospect, IL 60056 CLIENT: True North Consultants, Inc. 1 l� N• 5213454 - 4 page 15 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE HEADQUARTERS CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR DESIGN 1 CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR DESIGN 2 FGM G'`;, E C H 0 T E T J CONCEPTUAL EXTERIOR 17* a a of Mount Prospect Community Development :Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL CASSADY, VILLAGE MANAGER CC: NELLIE BECKNER, ASSISTANT TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: MARK RYSAVY, DD BUILDING & INSPECTION SERVICES DATE: MARCH 22, 2018 SUBJECT: POLICE CONCEPT SUMMARY AT 200 E. EVERGREEN AVE In response to a Village Board request to assess the validity of redeveloping the existing retail/office site at 200 E. Evergreen into an annex for the current Police and Fire Headquarters, Village Staff asked FGM Architects, Inc. to evaluate this concept. As FGM previously performed the space needs study for the Police and Fire Departments, which is being used as the basis for future designs, planning and budgeting, they are a trusted performer for this evaluation. In response to Staff's request, FGM Architects provided a basic site plan study showing the redeveloptuout of 200 ,'E. Evergreen with a 48,000 square feet building, consisting of underground parking with a ramp, an underground gun range, and two stories of Police functions above grade. In order to prevent Police staff from walking in the elements and through the street to get from the existing station to the annex, a bridge between the two buildings, over Maple Street, was included in the concept. In addition, the complete reconstruction of the existing parking garage was included to solve the chronic maintenance and leaking issues associated with it. A summary of the proposed low-end budget reveals the following: • Reconstruction of the existing Parking Deck • Remodel of existing interior of Police and Fire Station • Bridge over Maple Street to new Annex • 2 Story Annex plus underground parking and range • Extra GC costs and Temp Construction due to phasing • Material and labor escalation allowance • Design, pricing, and construction contingency • Total Construction Costs • Furniture and Equipment Allowance • Soft Costs (Design, permits, etc.) • Owner's contingency • Total Police and Fire HQ Annex budget (no land value inc.) $2,950,965.00 $10,540,590.00 $1,785,000.00 $16,744,000.00 $680,000.00 $2,329,097.00 $3,502,966.00 $38,532,617.00 (low estimate) $856,000.00 $3,094,946.00 $395,095.00 $42,878658.00 (low estimate) Police Concept Summary at 200 E. Evergreen Ave March 22, 2018 Page 2 The overall low-end budget for the projected annex concept is just under $43 million, while the high-end budget tops out just under $47 million. These budget numbers exclude any legal fees for any potential eminent domain processes, land acquisition, and relocation costs for the several tenants in the existing building. While the space can be built on this neighboring property for the everyday police functions, there will still be a significant parking shortage for the combined facility. The significant cost per square foot increase over an adaptive reuse, or even all-new construction, is due to the duplicitous building systems that would be involved. The existing building at 112 E. Northwest Hwy has significant issues with its mechanical systems due to the design of the original roof structure, which require a major redesign and replacement. Each building requires its own water, sanitary, electric, mechanical, plumbing, elevators, and fire protection systems. This means double the installation costs and double the long term maintenance. Tn mnct races the. most expensive parr nf any MFP (Mechanical; Flectrical, and Kimbina) system is the main unit. With two buildings, duplicating the most expensive parts of these MEP systems, rather than just adding more branches to one larger main unit, results in significantly higher costs per square foot. There is a significant loss of economies of scale when one builds two 40,000 square feet buildings, rather than one 80,000 square foot building. Independent of the cost implications and the lack of parking, there will be significant operational impacts for the Police Staff in particular. FGM's Space Needs Analysis study identified numerous issues with the existing small and stacked building footprint and how it is causing physical barriers within the Police Department. The further segregation of divisions within the department by placing Maple Street between the two halves of the building will exasperate these issues and drive a bigger wedge between divisions. While the idea of a bridge that connects two buildings may seem like a helpful concept, it actually can act as an impedance for those employees on the first floors. They would have to go up a flight of stairs, across the bridge 200 feet, then down a flight of stairs to deal with someone in the other half of the building. This is less than ideal. The higher budget for construction, coupled with the significant impacts to operations with the Police Department and an expected prolonged eminent domain acquisition process (as the owner of the building has indicated they have no desire to sell at this time) do not support the concept of building an annex at 200 E. Evergreen Ave as a viable solution for the long term needs of the Police Department. Arthur J. Rogers & Co. www.arthurjrogers.com. Sales • Management • Leasing • Construction February 23, 2018 Mr. Mike Cassady Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Sheet Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: 200 East Evergreen Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Mike: Thank you for your interest in the above noted property. I spoke with the property owner, Ms. Lu Maloney about this property and inquired if she would consider selling the building. Ms. Maloney explained to me (eery politely) that she has absolutely no interest to sell the building. I promised to keep in touch with her in the future. Below is a brief summary of this property: 15,700 square feet .77 acre land site (33,540 sf) ■ 2016 Taxes @ 64,809, PIN: 08-12-110-031-0000 0 Multi -Tenant occupancy with at least 7 tenants 45 car +/- car parking • Per Co -Star Listing, the building was purchased by the current owner in 1998 for $135,000 I mailed the Ms. Maloney a letter after we spoke and will continue to keep in touch with her. Since this property has several tenants and most likely a range of lease expiration dates (and possibly renewal options), acquiring it, followed by vacating each tenant can be time consuming. Please know that there was no discussion about why I called other than my initial inquiry. Thank you for reviewing this information. Please do not hesitate to call me if I can provide additional information or answer any questions you have. I am looking forward to speaking with you soon. Sincerely, da 114 Mark Baumhart, CCIM individual Membership C R I C A a 0 1.559 Elmhurst Road Elk Grove Village, IL 60007-6452 • (847) 297-2200 • FAX (847)699-9048 Individual Membership µ 1559 Elmhurst Road Elk Grove Village, 1160007-6452 • 0 (847)197-1200 FAX (847)699-9048 FGM ARCHITECTS March 20, 2018 Mount Prospect Police and Fire FGM Project No. 18-2494.01 Remodel Existing Building and Add Addition Across Maple Street The existing combined Police and Fire Station located at 112 E. Northwest Highway is a three- story brick building with one story below grade and two stories above grade. The overall building is 67,658 square feet, of which 34,416 square feet is for the Police Department, 22,360 square feet is for the Fire Department and 10,882 square feet is common space. When the building was designed and constructed in 1993, accommodations for the changing needs of the Village were not planned for and the building no longer meets the needs of the Police and Fire Departments. The building as originally designed does not effectively support police and Fire Department operations. Both departments have had to conform their procedures to the physical constraints of the building. Most notably are how various divisions within each Department are segregated from each other which makes communication and collaboration very difficult. For example, in the Police Department; the Administration, Records and Investigation Divisions are physically separated from the rest of the Department which has unintentionally fostered a segregated environment. The Space Needs Analysis prepared by FGM Architects in 2017 identifies that 108,030 square feet of space is required for the Police and Fire Departments in a combined building. Parking requirements during peak demand (afternoons) includes 90 spaces for staff, 45 spaces for visitors, and 64 for department vehicles. Many factors contribute to the need for additional space including changes in operation, information technology, and accessibility. FGM was asked by the Village to explore the feasibility of remodeling the existing Police and Fire Department and adding an addition across Maple Street to meet the overall space needs requirements. The Fire Department would be expanding within the existing building and the Police Department, which has the greatest shortage of space, would be expanded onto a property located across Maple Street directly to the east of the existing site. In this scenario, the economies of a single building to house both the Police and Fire Departments would be lost. Items such as mechanical rooms and building circulation (stairs and elevators) would need to be duplicated and the overall area required would need to increase to approximately 1 10,000 square feet or more given the inefficiency of the scheme. If the Maple Street property were to be utilized for an expansion, a pedestrian bridge would be required over the street to join the two buildings. This concept would require the construction of an approximately 48,000 square foot building, built on three levels. The lower level could accommodate a Firearms Range and additional parking that is lacking on the current site. The first and second floor could include Public Lobby, Front Desk, Records, Patrol, and Lock Up, Administration, and Investigations split between the two floors. FGM ARCHITECTS The existing Police Department spaces could be renovated to include Evidence & Property, IT, Locker Rooms, Fitness, Staff Support spaces, and Shared spaces. Training Spaces on the first floor could be used for Fire Department functions. The existing building would require a complete remodeling with the exceptions of the Fire Department Apparatus Bay and Hose Tower which would only require some renovating and updating. Per our 2017 report, we would recommend that the existing parking deck and underground garage be completely rebuilt. While this concept could accommodate all the space needs of the Police Department. It is our opinion that such a facility would further segregate the Department and severely hamper communication and collaboration even more so than the building does now. Spaces that are now split between three floors would be split even more remotely between three additional floors and a 200' bridge. See attached Site Concept drawing and Budget. EL O 03 0) c L� .. . ... ...... .. ...... . ... ... 4 g C"r4 ' CIS v '0 u CP C-) U 0 a c c cr 5 �L: ua < U- > x < n E 0 pp > 4� u c _0 c0 0 0u u (D 0 0 um Q) E 2 _0 u 6 > E3 D 0 E w E 0 E Q)Q) ,O U00 u c LU < uj LL < LO "Rol 0% 0 W) 10 V: c 0' w C'i 00 CN CN m 00 W) 0 0 01 01 �2 IN 0 09 V) . ..... - mu C 0 L0 Lr) 00 10 01 C C 10 cr LO 0 0 01 110 C) C) CZ) C C) C) 1 0 C4 co 00 C C) C) 0 0 3: V c6 cq 0 Lr) 00 LO C) IV Lxi 00 1-t 00 -i q- 0 C:), 00 cm) 0�- 0 co a, C)q c lw� c% C') t., C4 04 V' LO LO IN J. �14 C14 01 CD CN lc� .. .......... . . . . .. ...... tfl *n t09 bl-� b9 tol bl!� 119 v3l� Itl b4:1 C v 10 C CD LO V) .. ... . ..... .. . . . ...... ..... - ol C) 3: CN 00 q 0 C) to:) t0q *04 4A V+ t0q 0 Cl) 0 Lr) CD LO �9, pp C%4 00 0 CO C14 Lr) to.) -u- .. . . ........ .. . . . c ri c) c,1 c, 0 0 CN 110 Cd I C-4 Ji v .......------ 0 u CL 0 E (U 0 0 a! 0 LE r 0 C a r - C) a E D 0 U U SOC 0 -d Z U U c) a 0 "D C c c 00 a - -6 0 C; C D 4c 0) ; 0 0 c U u U CL 0 A Ny 0 '? 0 20 .2 0 4) ZIP i o CL Z; 0 '0 0 r r) u Z c u vi 0 0 A C CL "a >WP a) -d u C) Ci -6 < 0 Ol V III 0 0 CM 0MMS 0) CL 0 @am wl ID > E �E OD (v 411 E J a E p how 0 n� tn' tn D D ca 0- 'D 7S Ju........... ....... . EL O 03 0) c L� 0 u cr, vs F- Lo 44 iri V) Z 00 2 U C Uu 5 :8 @ 0 u CL t az C]V) (1) % E u- U- 4A < a '0 a 2 u c n Sc: 0 C C: a) a- `3 t2 0 C: .;-- C u 0 M— Lu E w C 4) a) 0 C: E 0 0) 4), 11-s a) !R 0 L=. . ' W, 0 c •F= 2) E LD CC CL C 0 ELU LL .0 u .LD- -0 c Z;i U 0 Cls cm > E p— E c u LU u r Ll 0 > a c -�; D > U L-0 0 0 E - t) L'q 0 u � C o 0 g 15 0 0 E U C3 Lu z O[ dS OQ) 0 u a, a u C (D a) C - c u u 0 0 15 c C a - R ): > E 0 C) ayyy cn 0- C3 < LL tA LU Cl) U E 0 0) 0 u u C3 4u c' U a > U . ...... .... . . "0 C6 6 C5 cd n ci ori 1XI C; w9 tA + 0 6� ' 0 0 -- ---- ----- C:) C:) CD 0 Q '0 '.�r 0 C) 0 0'r 0 'r Lo ol Go W) 0 q q CD 0 9 co rvi 9 L6 — le �o 0: vi CO LO 0 — U-) — In CO LO 0 0 1010, 0, Ln ol w r� 10 — co co 0 �m co cli t04 b-'] 44 v, b4 ":) 64 to-:, cr, vs F- Lo 44 iri V) Z 00 2 U C Uu 5 :8 @ 0 u CL t az C]V) (1) % E u- U- 4A < a '0 a 2 u c n Sc: 0 C C: a) a- `3 t2 0 C: .;-- C u 0 M— Lu E w C 4) a) 0 C: E 0 0) 4), 11-s a) !R 0 L=. . ' W, 0 c •F= 2) E LD CC CL C 0 ELU LL .0 u .LD- -0 c Z;i U 0 Cls cm > E p— E c u LU u r Ll 0 > a c -�; D > U L-0 0 0 E - t) L'q 0 u � C o 0 g 15 0 0 E U C3 Lu z O[ dS OQ) 0 u a, a u C (D a) C - c u u 0 0 15 c C a - R ): > E 0 C) ayyy cn 0- C3 < LL tA LU Cl) I .9 a E 1102 do = L L u E., Cl) MR Village of Mount Prospect l Fire Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL CASSADY FROM: FIRE CHIEF DATE: 3.16.2018 SUBJECT: FIRE STATION 13 LOCATION The Fire Department provides Fire and EMS services to the entire Village of Mount Prospect and Forest River Fire Protection District (FRFPD). Apparatus and personnel currently respond from three fire stations located in the Village. Station 12 at Golf Road and Busse Road provides service to the southern portion of the Village. Station 12 was built in 1985 and remodeled in 2003. Station 13 (Public Safety Building) is currently in the downtown located at Northwest Highway and Maple Street. Station 13 was built in 1993 and provides service to the center and north sections of the Village. Station 13 also serves as our headquarters station because it houses our administration. Station 14 is located at Kensington Road and River Road and provides service to the northeast area of the Village and FRFPD. Station 14 was built in 2009 to replace the FRFPD station located in the same area. All three of the current fire stations are located in the same areas where they were originally built. The Village of Mount Prospect and the Fire Department have significantly changed throughout the years. To provide the best service to the community, changes to the demographics of the Village should constantly be evaluated. The borders of the Village today are much different from when the Village incorporated in 1918. When the location and space needs of the Public Safety Building began, we also evaluated possible changes to improve service from the Fire Department. There are many performance measures that are used to evaluate the effective response of Fire and EMS services. The first measure used is response times. This includes the time it takes to receive an emergency call, the time it takes to dispatch apparatus and personnel, the time it takes personnel to leave the fire station, and lastly, the travel time to the location of the call. Other variables include multiple station response and the use of mutual aid companies. The physical location of a fire station should be the most optimal location when possible. When I became Fire Chief, I already knew that we had long response times to the southern and northern portion of the Village. What is most important about these areas are the frequent requests for service. To fully comprehend the gaps in service that we believed existed, we looked for an independent consultant to review our data. We reached Fire Station 13 Location 3.15.2018 Page 2 out to the Illinois Fire Chiefs Association (IFC) to compile a report. We also gave them different locations that are available for locating both a sub -fire station and headquarters fire station. The report is complete, and it provides information specifically about the optimal location for Station 13. The IFC report also provides an overall optimal location of all three fire stations based on travel times and historical call data. The report recommended relocating Station 14 to Euclid Avenue and Wolf Road and Station 13 to Gregory and Main Streets. Since understand that relocating our newest fife station is not possible at this time, I reviewed the second best recommendation, which is to relocate Station 13 to the MB Bank property at 111 East Rand Road. I am recommending pursuing the movement of Station 13 to this property for multiple reasons. There will be a significant reduction in response times from that location compared to the current location. Location of the physical fire station is a constant that can be controlled, and we should place the fire station in the ideal location. The MB Bank property has access to Main Street and Rand Road which assists in responding in multiple directions. The property is also large enough to accommodate the Fire Administration and the Fire Prevention Bureau. Although separating fire department operations from the administration is possible, having both entities in one location is more effective and efficient with communication and operations. Other ideal locations in the IFC report would require new construction and do not support a large enough facility to include Fire Administration and the Fire Prevention Bureau. Response times will be reduced to some of our significant target hazards which include Prospect High School, Randhurst Village, Kensington Business Center, the Boxwood Community, and all of the multi -family residences on our northern borders. The last reason is that the IFC report supports the location of Station 13 on the MB Bank property to be the ideal location. We have an opportunity to significantly improve response times by location alone. I also look at the fact that if Station 13 was already located on the recommended property, would we be considering moving the station to the downtown location. The configuration of the Village, call data, and the report would not support that effort. Although Station 13 was optimally located at one time, it is no longer the best location for providing the most effective and efficient service to the community. I am recommending and support the relocation of Station 13 from the current location downtown to the MB Bank property at 111 East Rand Road. Brian Lambel 3rL:i Qocumentl R sa , Mark om: Mark Saumhart <mbaurnhart@arthurjrogers.com> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 2:49 PM To: Cassady, Michael Cc: Rysavy, Mark Subject: FW; 111 N. Rand Attachments: Land 5ales.pdf Most of these are much smaller than the subject property. l will call you after we speak From: Tracey Kukuk [mailto:TKukuk@mbfinancial.com] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 1:23 FM To: Mark Baumhart Cc: Stacy Koty Subject: RE: 111 N. Rand Mark, To assist in aur conversation tomorrow I am forwarding you some information our appraisal group provided related to additional camps in the area. 205 E. land Road, 11t. Pros ectIt is a 1.11 -acre redevelopment site (former Wendy's) sold in February 20I6 for $520,000 or $10.75 PSF land value. The site, odjoining the subject to the south, was since redeveloped with a fast food restaurant (Andy's Frozen Custard). The seller's broker, Adam Foret (CBRE), reported this as an arm's length transaction without conditions affecting the sale price. This transaction requires upward adjustments to account for the inferior morket conditions at the time of sale, expenses immediately after purchase (demolition) and inferior accessibility/lower traffic count (frontage only along Rand Rood). A downward adjustment is applicable for its smaller sire. The adjusted sale price of this comp would be at/near $14.00 PSF. 80I E. Rcrnd' Round mt. Press ect fL is a 5.00 -acre redevelopment sire sold in March 2015 for $3,600,000 or $16.53 PSF land value. The site is across the street from a Walmort5upercenter anchored development (Mt. Prospect Plaza). The sellers broker, Kevin Cox (CBRE), reported this as an arm's length transaction without conditions that affect the sale price. This transaction requires upward price adjustments to account for the inferior market conditions at the time of sole and its larger size. A significant downward location adjustment is necessary for being across the street from Walmort. The adjusted sale price of this comp would gravitate towards $I5.00 PSF. 79 Rand Road Mt Pros ect tL is o 8.19 -acre redevelopment parcel sold in January 2015 for $4,409,500 or $12.36 PSF land value. A portion of the site was since improved with a medical office building. This transaction requires upward price adjustments to account for the inferior market conditions at the time of sole, expenses immediately after purchase (demolition), lower troffic count and larger size. The adjusted sole price of this comp would be at/near $I5.00 PSF. 77 Rand gidM't. Ptos ect I is a pending sale of a triangular shaped, 1.65 -acre parcel with an asking price of $784,000 or $18.00 PSF land value. This is the east end of the previously discussed transaction (79 Rand Road). The seller's broker, Gary Farzio (CBRE), indicated that the site hos been under contract ot/near the asking price for four months and the closing is delayed due to zoning and water detention issues. This transaction requires on upward price adjustment to account for the inferior accessibility/lower traffic count (frontage only along Rand Rood). Downward adjustments are applicable for the current pending sole status (down word price adjustment is likely) and its smaller sire. An upward adjustment is required for the lower traffic count. Considering the potential closing issues, the adjusted sale price of this comp would be at/neor $14.00 P5F. Thank you and we look forward to talking with you tomorrow. Tracey From: Mark Baumhart [mailto: bum a _ ftttu "ro er . Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 8:44 PM To; Tracey Kukuk Cc: Stacy Koty Subject: Re: 111 N. Rand Yes. How about 2:00 ? Mark Baumhart COM 847-791-5180 11 n Fob 14, 0i8p at"4:17 PrAp atdcey Mark, I'm sorryfor the delay in getting back to you. We received information from our appraisal group and additional comps that they feel reflect the value of our property. Would you be available later this week for a quick call to discuss this Friday sometime between 1 and 3 pm? Thank you, Tracey From: Tracey Kukuk Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 12:23 PM To: Mark Baumhart Subject: Re: 111 N. Rand Mark, Thank you for sending this over. I will let you know if we have any questions but you should hear back from us late next week with our comments. Tracey From: Mark Baumhart <imbaurnhart arthur'ro er^s.com> Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 12:00:43 PM To: Tracey Kukuk Subject: 111 N. Rand Please review attached and call me t0 discuss your comments, NOTICE: This email message and any attachments is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it 2 is addressed and may contain information that is privileged.. confidential, proprietary and exempt from disclosure under applicable law If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, diSCIosLlre, dissemination, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify me immediately by replying to �the message and deleting it from your computer While all reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that this email and its attachments are virus free no liability can be accepted and it is recommended that the recipient scan all messages and attachments for viruses and other malicious data Additionally, notwithstanding anything in this communication or any attachment, nothing contained in this communication or any such attachment shall be deemed a waiver of any rights of MB Financial Stank, N A.. or its parents, subsidiaries or affiliates, under any financing agreement or document between MB Financial Bank, N.A., or its parents, subsidiaries or affiliates, and any individual or entity, or a modification to any such any financing agreement or d❑cument, nor shall this email constitute an offer or acceptance for purposes of forming a contract or commitment or amending a contract, unless (a) it explicitly states `E - Contract Intended" or "This email is intended to constitute a binding contract or commitment." and (b) it is signed by a duly authorized representative of MB Financial Bank. N A. NOTICE This email message and any attachments is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary and exempt from disclosure under applicable law If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, disclosure, dissemiriation, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify me immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. While all reasonable efforts have been taken to ensure that this email and its attachments are virus free no liability can be accepted and It: is recommended that the recipient sran all messages and attachments for viruses and other malicious data.. 'ditionally, notwithstanding anything in this communication or any attachment, nothing contained in this, communication ariy such attachment shall be deemed a waiver of any rights of MG Financial Bank, N.A., or its parents, subsidiaries or affiliates, under any financing agreement or document between MB Financial Bank, N.A.; or its parents, subsidiaries or affiliates, and any individual or entity, or a modification to any such any financing agreement or document, nor shall this email constitute an offer or acceptance for purposes of forming a contract or commitment or a -nendiIng a contract, c_ariless (a) it explicitly states °E -Contract intended" or "This email is intended to constitute a binding contract or commitment " and (b) it is signed by a duly authorized representative of MB Financial Sank, N.A. Scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. 920 N Elmhurst Ave Mount Prospect, IL 60058 Sale on 12!29!2017 for $900,000 ($107.8215F) - Public Record 8.347 5F Retall Auto Repair Building Ar. i ark;+ .]fe B. rn W ❑rule I.n SOLD L Xe i;7g., s fid "u r r r.• ■ ■ hlap data C201 t;oeNe Buyer & Seller Contact Info - Recorded Buyer: - Recorded Seller: Bfs Ratan & Comm Oprn True Buyer: - True Seller Bridgestone Retail Operations PriWSF: 333 E Lake St Price/AC Land Grass: Bloomingdale, IL 60100 ...... ......"__ I talked to Adam Cindy. The existing Improvements (630) 259-9000 SeIierType: will be demolished to make room For a proposed fast Listing Broker: Corporateluser JILL food restaurant. This Is a Smaller site in a superior Adam Cody location which sold for $30.22 PSF. (312) 228-3985 Jason Press (312) 2213-3980 Sale Date: 1 212 9/2017 (115 days on market) Escrow Length: - Sale Price: $900,000 Asking Price: - PriWSF: $107.82 Price/AC Land Grass: $1,316,559.39 Percent Leased. 100.0% Tenancy: Single Sale Conditions: Redevelopment Project No. of Tenants: 1 Tenants at time of sale: Firestone Complete Auto Care Transaction Details Sale Type. Investment Bldg Type: Retail - Auto Repair Year BuilVAge - GLA: 8,347 5F Land Area: 0.68 AC (29,778 5F) ID: 4093068 copyrighted report llcenmcl to M8 FlnanrJai Bank - 894427. 211/2018 Page 1 Gopyrlghted report licensed to MB Finenclel Bank - 694427 2!112018 Pegg 2 N et a Ii II IRI id Ive It o Ill.') u�-n III 'ISIS tie Aiv Ia Ii II a b lie °II Ir IIP lu,,i If I I1 -i JLL Retail is pleased to present the opportunity to purchase a .68 acre parcel, ideal for redevelopment, situated in the heart of the Mt. Prospect Rand hurst commercial corridor. - Located across the street from the regional mixed used project - Randhurst Village - Strong retail investment within 112mile of the site to include new construction Starbucks, Outback Steakhouse, Chick-fil-A, Potbelly, Mattress Firm, McDonald's (reio), and Andy's Frozen Custard - Tremendous view corridors to 17,300 vehicles per day on Elmhurst Road / Rt 83 920 N. Elmhurst Road, Mt. Prospect, IL. Adam Cody +1312 228 3985 Jason Press -1312 228 3980 ill.com/retail Locattheart of'the . P,irioisljjjiieict I Rand Road ,/' horst 'Ililllit e retall iiirwiil,-iii il," 920 Elmhurst Road represents an outstanding redevelopment opportunity at a high profile site in a mature and desirable market. The site is ideal for new to market end users as well as a re - positioning opportunities for users with an inferior location in the market. The intersection of Rand f Rt 83 / Kensington has been one of the most active retail trade areas in suburban Chicago over the past 18 rnonths. Sir.e ,::a )r citi:,atir,..,)in - Address - 920 N. Elmhurst Road - City - Mt. Prospect, IL 600.55 - PIN - 03-27-307-021-0000 - Land Area .68 Acres J 29,778 SF - Zoning - B4 - Commercial Corridor - Current Use -- Approx 7,8070 SF Automotive Repair �:..(. n v l i in e -- Call for offers - October 5th, 2017 - Best and final - October 13th, 2017 - Purchase and sale agreement - late October 2017 - Due Diligence Period - November 2017 - Close of escrow - on or before December 15th, 2017 920 N. Elmhurst Road, Mt. Prospect, IL Adam Cody 1 312 228 3985 01 �:orn Jason Press +1312 228 3980 105-115 S Main St - PID: 9975485 Development Site Mount Prospect, IL 80036 Sale on 317/2416 for $315,000 ($669,073.921AC) - Research Complete Commercial Land of 0.47 AC [20,508 SF] y� 03/07/2016 Escrow Length: l qi . ++ l re.. a $art l �d $61,299 rlmmW VIII ��rr M1M1 ........... E Henry S= C�flzr.Lrl Rd en C/) IVI L ., pp Gd'I �4pi �W 7 L7 it �_Telvb C6 ale ri�r_r: Map data Q'2018 G , Buyer & Sailer Contact Into Recorded Buyer Alpha Commercial Properties LLC Recorded Seller: Nakanishi Family Trust True Buyer: Norwood Builders True Seiler: Nakanishi Family Trust Bruce Adreani Matthew Nakanishi 7458 N Harlem Ave 25611 Park Blvd Chicago, IL 50531 Glen Ellyn, IL 50137 (773) 775-5400 (847) 816-9630 Buyer Type: Developer/Owner-RGNL Seller Type: Individual Transaction Details ID -.3574445 Sale Date. 03/07/2016 Escrow Length: - Sale Price: ;315,000-Deciaration Price/AC Land Gross: $689,073.92 ($15.361SF) Transfer Tax: 5472.50 Street Frontage: 115 feet on S Main St Sale Type: Investment Land Area: 0.47 AC {20,508 SF} Land Area - Net: 0.47 AC (20,517 SF) Proposed Use: Retail, Medical Percent Improved: 13.6% Total Value Assessed: $33,407 in 2014 Improved Value Assessed $4,547 Land Value Assessed: $28,860 Land Assessed/AC: $61,299 53 feet on E Busse Ave Topography: Level On -Site Improv: Asphalt paved lot Off -Site Improv: Cable, CurbiGutter/Sidewalk, Electricity, Gas, Irrigation, Sewer, Streets, Telephone, Water Parcel No: 08-12-108-015.0000, 08-12-108-032-0000 Document No: 1608133063 Copyrighted report licensed to MB Financial Bank - 694427 V112018 Page 1 145-115 5 Main &t - PID: 9975485 Development Site Commerclal Land of 0.47 AC (24,508 SF) (wn't) Transaction Notes +r s On March 7, 2016, the 0,4708 acre parcel of land located at 105-115 S Main St in Mount Prospect, IL was sold for $315,000, or $669,074 per acre. This was a previously developed lot and at util Itles were to the site at closing. Ths land will be devel oped into a 10, DO 0 SF mixed use rots lVmedicaI office building. Groundbreaking is set for early 2017. For more information on this property see CoStar Property ID: 9975485. The information contained in this report was verified through public record. Current Land Information ID: 10017752 Zoning: Proposed Use: RetaillMedical Density Allowed: - Land Area: 0.47 AC (20,508 SF) Number of Lots; - Land Area - Net: f 0.47 AC S Mao. .............. . . Max 9 of Units: Un ite mpravAspl9a�t pav®d fot Units per Acre: - Lot Dimensions: - Improvements: - Owner Type - Topography: Level Off -Site Improv: Cable, Curb/Gutter/Sidewalk, Electricity, Gas, Irrigation, Sewer, Streets, Telephone, Water Street Frontage: 115 feet on S Main St 53 feet on E Busse Ave Location Information Metro Market: Chicago Submarket: Northwest/Schaumburg Area County: Cook CBSA: Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI CSA: Chicago -Naperville, IL -IN -WI DMA: Chicago, IL -IN Copyrighted report Ikwaed to MB rinarkyal Bank - 594427 2/1/2018 Page 2 105-115 S Main St - PID: 99754$5 Development Site SOLD Commercial Land of 0.47 AC (20,508 SFJ [don't] Parcel Number: 08-12-108.015-0000, 08-12-108-032-0000 Legal Description: - Cdunty. Cook Plat Map: 105-115 S Main St ,a I 1058 2 � I� I ID r rs[ 3 a -06 o"Di a� D X 14 ° zrG 5a va[ f'e "All �7 � w P OSSE [ y 14 r li ll y r OA NI * r mla t t �� ' �+ -014 Copyrighted report licensed to MB Financial Bank - 6944 27 211/2018 Page 3 77 Rand Rd Dee Plaines, IL 60016 Land of 1.65 AC is far sale at 51,293,732 ($784,0801AC) Sales Co: CBRE 700 Commerce Dr Oak Brook, IL 60523 (630) 573-7000 UNDER CONTRACT E. I f�Uri rre„ 0 e c u y F?tiFt'[l s;t �, arJrJ y•.I: r�W data 02618 Gcyl 5aie Contacts Sales Contact 1: Matthew Ishikawa (630)573-7068 Sales Contact 2: Gary M. Fazzio (630) 573-7090 For Sale Data Asking Price: $1,293,732 Sale Type: Investment Price(AC Land Gross: $784,080.00 ($18.00fSF) Land Area: 1.65 AC (71,874 5F) Days on Market. 24 Proposed Use=....... Commercial Sale ....................................................................a.� -.,n Sale Status: Under Contract Talked to n',~t.IC/ I az' io. T iO pn"'opiC=wty hs StIW a pGltndur'ng Sale Parcel No: 09-07-100-033-0000 (zoriunrng and cleteIrntionIns &..,n s),, 11"hie, pleniding Iurc iase piricle is at/ rilear the asking, '11 ie proposed USE-.) its Ireta H. Transaction Notes + t1 65 Acres + Asking $1,293,732 ($18.00 PSF) + Zoned C-3 General Commercial + 19,000 vehicles per day on Rand Road + Please call for additional information Zoning: C-3 Density Allowed: - Number of Lots: - Max # of Units: - Units per Acre: - Improvements: - Current Land Information Proposed Use. Commercial Land Area: 1.65 AC (71,874 5F) Min Div Lot Size. - On -Site Improv. - Lot Dimensions: - Owner Type: - Traffic Count: 19,000 cars per day on Rand Rd Location Information Copynghted report licensed to Me Financial Bank - 694427. 0:10052058 21112018 Page 1 rn 7 c. .n m 5 � E. I f�Uri rre„ 0 e c u y F?tiFt'[l s;t �, arJrJ y•.I: r�W data 02618 Gcyl 5aie Contacts Sales Contact 1: Matthew Ishikawa (630)573-7068 Sales Contact 2: Gary M. Fazzio (630) 573-7090 For Sale Data Asking Price: $1,293,732 Sale Type: Investment Price(AC Land Gross: $784,080.00 ($18.00fSF) Land Area: 1.65 AC (71,874 5F) Days on Market. 24 Proposed Use=....... Commercial Sale ....................................................................a.� -.,n Sale Status: Under Contract Talked to n',~t.IC/ I az' io. T iO pn"'opiC=wty hs StIW a pGltndur'ng Sale Parcel No: 09-07-100-033-0000 (zoriunrng and cleteIrntionIns &..,n s),, 11"hie, pleniding Iurc iase piricle is at/ rilear the asking, '11 ie proposed USE-.) its Ireta H. Transaction Notes + t1 65 Acres + Asking $1,293,732 ($18.00 PSF) + Zoned C-3 General Commercial + 19,000 vehicles per day on Rand Road + Please call for additional information Zoning: C-3 Density Allowed: - Number of Lots: - Max # of Units: - Units per Acre: - Improvements: - Current Land Information Proposed Use. Commercial Land Area: 1.65 AC (71,874 5F) Min Div Lot Size. - On -Site Improv. - Lot Dimensions: - Owner Type: - Traffic Count: 19,000 cars per day on Rand Rd Location Information Copynghted report licensed to Me Financial Bank - 694427. 0:10052058 21112018 Page 1 Copynghted resort licensed to MS Financial Bank - 994427 211/2018 Pane 2 QU 14MIC" 9A" N A o ....... ... ...... ,11i1v ill 2 L E o 2 L E DO �r t Ln mm fj G) Q� -N E E: 2 m > < LL sm LL I� cls C3 Co "I C4 m N A.P. 0 E E E M Lf I'-- UO cL L -J 1. 205 E Rand Rd Mount Prospect, IL 60036 Sale on 214/2016 for $520,600 ($161.591SF) - Research Complete 3,218 SF Retail Fast Food Building Built In 1989 SOLD Sale Date: 02104/2016 )212 days on market) Sale Type OwnerlUser ", di :r i� ❑ } ..73, n9 5520,000 -Confirmed .rj a- o � Asking Price. Buyer S Seller Contact Info G7 Z y 4 r True Buyer: Kerry Watts True Seiler: The Wendy's Company Kerry Watts C7 1440 W Republic Rd Dublin, OH 43017 Springfield, M 65 g W Highiand St E ( 417} 890-5906 � �,� �h1��.�t a fast food 1"t"1`staUlfwlitIf"Ffl )Heid liutN°Li iL,f. evielopllat". with -n Scott Fuldner Sale Date: 02104/2016 )212 days on market) Sale Type OwnerlUser ii n,;r}r3Ie1J 120 days Bldg Type: Retail - Fast Food Sale Price: 5520,000 -Confirmed w wi w r Map da La @2018 G oogle Built in 1989 Age: 27 Asking Price. Buyer S Seller Contact Info Recorded Buyer: Fulwatt, LLC Recorded Seller: Wendy's International, LLC True Buyer: Kerry Watts True Seiler: The Wendy's Company Kerry Watts 1 Dave Thomas Blvd 1440 W Republic Rd Dublin, OH 43017 Springfield, M 65 g _ (614) 764-3100 ( 417} 890-5906 � �,� �h1��.�t a fast food 1"t"1`staUlfwlitIf"Ffl )Heid liutN°Li iL,f. evielopllat". with Scott Fuldner value at ' 1 15 PSS'- ...Fhe 'side IV'S 'a jaCalnt to the Scott Fuldner subje,Ct howe'Ver, it has flF019ta t: on y ong Fla'llli 1440 W Republic Rd Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Road Verified by dam F:: reL.. (702) 217-9235 n..._ Buyer Type: Individual Seller Type: Corporate/User Buyer Broker: Newmark Knight Frank Listing Broker: CBRE Bill Selonick Nicholas Peters (312)696-6700 (630)573-7082 Adam Foret (630) 645-2620 Transaction details ID: 3495573 Sale Date: 02104/2016 )212 days on market) Sale Type OwnerlUser Escrow Length: 120 days Bldg Type: Retail - Fast Food Sale Price: 5520,000 -Confirmed Year BuilVAge: Built in 1989 Age: 27 Asking Price. $525,000 GLA: 3,218 SF Price/SF. $161.59 Land Area: 1.11 AC (48,332 SF) PricelAC Land Grass. $488,468.47 Percent Leased: 0.0°% Tenancy: Single Percent Improved: 77.2% Total Value Assessed: 5132,499 in 2014 Improved Value Assessed 5102,354 Land Value Assessed: 530,145 Land Assessed/AC: $27,157 Copyrighted report licensed to MB Financial Bank -694427 2JS12018 Page 1 205 E Rand Rd SOLD 3,218 5F Retail Fast Food Building Built in 1989 (can't) Financing Down payment of $520,000.00 (100.0%) Parcel No: 03-34-200-184-0000 Document No: 1604245039 Sale History: Sold for $520,000 ($161.5915F) on 2/412016 Sold for $510,000 ($158.481SF) on 10/1511999 Transaction Notes On February 4, 2016, the 3,218 SF general retail building located at 205 E Rand Road in Mount Prospect, Illinois sold in an owner/user sale for $520,000, or $161.59 per square foot. The one-story building was built in 1989, zoned B3, and vacant at the time of the sale, The property was on the market for approximately 212 days with an original asking price of $525,000. The transaction was under contract for approximately 120 days and not financed Both the buyer and seller had representation in the transaction. The seller was motivated to divest of the property as this Wendy's location closed in April of 2015 and they sought to liquidate the asset. The buyer was motivated to purchase this properly to open Andy's Frozen Custard corporate store and plan to open in September of 2016. The sale price, sale date, sale type, escrow period vacancy, and occupancy were confirmed by the listing Broker and the buyers broker. Income Expense Data Expenses -Taxes $40,603 Operating Expenses Total Expenses $40,603 Current Retail Information ID. -9123325 Property Type: Retail -Fast Food ... _ _ ... ...... .... .GLA: 3,218 5F .... ...�., .o .. _ _ Center. - Total Avaii: 0 SF Bldg Status: Built in 1989 % Leased: 100.0% Owner Type: Individual Bldg Vacant: 0 SF Zoning: B3 Land Area: 1.11 AC Owner Occupied: No Lot Dimensions: Building FAR: 0.07 Rent1SFNr: - No. of Stores: - CAM: - Street Frontage. 161 feet on Rand Rd (with 2 curb cuts) Expenses. 2016 Tax @ $12.621sf Parking: 47 free Surface Spaces are available Features. Drive Thru, Pylon Sign, Signage Metro Market: Chicago Submarket: Northwest/Schaumburg Area County: Cook CBSA: Chicago-Naperville-Eigin, IL -1N -WI CSA. Chicago -Naperville, IL -IN -WI DMA. Chicago, IL -IN Property Notes Property Description: Fast Food Restaurant Copyrighted report licensed to MB Financial Bank - 69442T 2/5/2018 Page 2 205 E Rand Rd 3,218 SF Retell Fast Food Building Built In 1989 {can't} Parcel Number' 03-34-200-184-0000 Legal Description: - County: Cook Plat Map. 205 E Rand Rd C "H" i S. 14 Of � to ........... n®_ we. PoY iwuuwwwur�wvuaoi�no � w,ti ti .in 139 1 NN 14 II .� X45 +[r ryry," r� NtlipII 131 Ix,A -147 4P , 4$7 443 -149 y Ivyof° J�y� `� ® � JUDITHANNOR a IIRNI M" y MIS{ i 1a � l +'I'%fidSRi• r to .Vln u^i Y.� nu rc71'1T ��1 ' l ^�elwI I'd.. t' F � lFI F4k9F��'Y ai � a �ro � a,r i i• ,i Ir{ a'!'I rl�l I I i i a•175 ! �?93 � •id2 � •1� „ +. �. l �n,r„ ��e �.,..,. , w i _ . y_A ��� I,S ! }� 1, 1 i � � w l+��n d'+Oih i �� ficil } ]r3� •16d x 472 I� � 402 N 8!l -„., f61 1fi� 1T3 P�,1 r l 4r N t hJ1. 4y� ^ 1Bf w l r 09G I, * •_ I N � I i n i.0 j,re{Ir,6Iu r l l l l s A l �. � • a i g, tl I 1 loN�l�i � l�l�li�l ,N q ��'llll IkCl�l �l Ii111 ...�,.�..W_.�.,•_...°1•�Y_._.�.��e ,. mow- r� e � �r'' ai@�°+='dSinrcd 1kn 4�°,�fa1+ M,a �;A'7i,,a�Y,�7w7'lai, n C,opyrighled report iloensed 10 MB Flnam W Sank - 694427 2/512018 Page 3 �I 205 E Rand Rd 3,218 SF Retail Fast Food Building Built in 1989 (eon't) Plat Map: 205 E Rand Rd T� alar N �. II S l ��d N ' M NIS @ ,wa/�w1'ir+v.�At"�"a l,iawM... wrA it 1 ! 4ti 4r' �w^r �y i►� .�4�.r�" y ➢ # dNknr a� e,>' A I iod�l ",NN! « ' � J00MY ANS 1.04 l i I ,• i TI � —►TF °�'aY,B �� ��„� �' �" C � I 1 � lir"`-'"�' � y Op tw i k "yJM� rt rte` _ t 0 �I104 I,Ilv ,a� IMj rrlt err sa �I. , .: r is srf, 4(9 e _10- n l JII pa�'* "tL �*��.rW�i. !r �4"Mq"iMtl� dMy it •al�i�' i'G'T"d "' 1 1Y.W r 17��t ,,, i dR:WY in Pl yP+ Ari': ss:� �w iItiIh �M1 'r Ff lP , t � � + '� 9 i lr r � l• M l 4�a, � fol r ti �f{f 010� " ill AIL a ea * � f :c°"nl �� JB+f � Mf � JLr�,a�i -, •� 1.tT -�+"r � II �7 fi p f Imo.. �,., � f Tf � � � �P�7 • ! N � J�F Ard i �� 004 Pel Copyrighted report liluensad to M5 Financial Bank - 694-027 21612018 Page 4 401 E IKens{ngton Rd Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Land of 4.40 AC Is for sale at 52,500,000 ($568,181.821AC) L- -Kensin,gtim Rd FOR SALE oackberryr' Sales Co: CBRE 700 Commerce Dr Oak Brook, IL 60523 (630) 573-7000 liighianc A,' F Hig0W)d St m s c• na � c � rn ■ • ■ Map data 92018 GoQ41 Sale Contacts Sales Contact 1: Brian Buckingham [630]573-7021 Sales Contact 2: Tam Svoboda (530) 388-8615 Sale Type: For Sale Data Asking Price: $2,500,000 Price/AC Land Gross: $568,181.82 ($13.04l5F) Days on Market: 159 Sale Status: Active Topography: Level Parcel No: 03-34-201-008-0000, 03-34201-037-0000 Sale Type: Investment Land Area: 4.40 AC (191,664 SF) Lot Dimensions: 200x200 - Irregular Proposed Use Commercial, Retail, MultiFamily Transaction Notes t 4.4 acres Frontage on E Kensington Rd Zoned R-2 Attached Single -Family Residential Frontage on E Rand Rd and remaining property Zoned B-3 Community Shopping Traffic Gounts: 24,300 vehicles per day on Rand Rd 8,100 vehicles per day on Kensington Rd Parcel Numbers 03-24-201-008 & 03-34-201-037 Taxes: $41,772.03 Asking $2,500,000 Please call for additional information 401 E Kensington Road, Mt Prospect, IL shape when, con -pared to tt-ie subie t Copyrighted report licensed to Me Financial Bank - 694427 215!2018 Page 1 � 401 E Kensington Rd Land of 4.40 AC Is For sale at $2,500,000 ($568,189.821AC) (can't) Current Land Information FOR SALE Zoning: 8-3 & R-2 Proposed Use: Corn merc!allRetalIIMultiFamiiy Density Allowed: - Land Area 4.40 AC (191,664 SF) Number of Lots: - Min Div Lot Size: - Max # of Units: On -Site Improv, - Units per Acre: - Lot Dimensions: 200x200 - Irregular Improvements: - Owner Type: Individual Topography: Level ON -Site lmprov. Cable, CurblGutterlSidewalk, Electricity, Gas, Irrigation, Sewer, Streets, Telephone, Water Street Frontage: 194 feet on E Rand Rd 467 feet on E Kensington Rd Metro Market: Chicago Submarket: Northwest/Schaumburg Area County. Cook CBSA: Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL-IN-Wi CSA: Chicago -Naperville, IL-iN-Wi DMA: Chicago, IL -IN Land Notes ID: 68a2155 Property Info: The property is located on Plana Rd. (Rt. 12) near Kensington Rd, in the northeast section of Mt, Prospect just south of Randhurst Mail The mall, constructed in 1962, has had its ups an downs but is the dominant retail property in the area Costa? and Home Depot are now located on the perimeter. The Casto Company is now the development partner in a venture with ,JP Morgan and i's planning a major reconfiguration which may Include residential uses. The property's frontage on Rand Rd is suitable for almost any type of commercial use while the Kensington frontage may be more suitable for multi -family housing G"nghled report licensed to Me Financial Hank -69U27 21512016 Page 2 401 Ez Kensington Rd FORSALE Land of 4.40 AC Is for sale at $2.500,000 ($568.181.82/AC) (conl) Parcel Number: - Legal Description: - County: Cook Plat Map, 401 E Kensington Rd l,w ikIia b a "Bit 11 N Ilk Of v 6'V �08 Ig - Hill 7 452 W T 15 W, 147 W qw k14 -IR '141 vq Im 'l Jill 74 JUDO ANN OR "T VU F7 711 41 7 oil 1 11EQ TO !1 Copylrlghtad fepart 11 con5ed to MB Financial Bonk - WAA 27 2151201 8 page rein.:, IT � LEI ME =EM I I im 0 fig;; -0 cl rL m N C c I- cy- a) CD V 7 c CN w 0 C..k., 0 c- >1 0 � 0 u 0 LO E CY) C) CD C:� CD C) Ci wC) LI -i 0 u D (L) C) LZ o Q) EC) CN 0 > J CD C� m 4) U) u CD C, c ul Q- a 0 u 0 C) 9- LL V') CN co 0- C) ' < 0- lk 0. a W. a Wyl LU 0 0 .. CL v 10 N C-0 co --t et C) 0, U. LD CIO L) C7 C7 O Cl) LC) Lr> 10 �-n -r m CID et C) 0, LD L) C7 C7 O Cl) Lr> 10 �-n -r m CID et C\j CL cl cl 841 E Rand Rd Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Cale on 3/2/2015 for $3,600,000 ($720,000.00dAQ - Research Complete Commercial Land of 6 AC (217,S00 SF) k Central ltd SOLD ter:,E Car&mi Ln S a x n � DrCentem mt Prospect a Sale Date: 0 310 7120 1 5 (1,176 days on market) Escrow Length: 60 days Sale Price: 500 Asking Prioe: 3750000 Price/AC Land Gross' Mkrawh' Zoning: R-1 Virtual Earth 7jimr= 3l,wr E Busse Ave Buyer & Seller Contact info Recorded Buyer: Speed-gmx Mount Prospect LLC Recorded Seller Trust 69-4105 True Buyer: Speadwagon Properties True Seiler: Joseph Miceli Steve Khoshahe Joseph Miceli Jason Schiffman 21 Lexington Rd 400 N LaSalle St South Barrington, IL 60010 Chicago, IL 60654 (847) 428-8711 (800) 550-6370 Buyer Type: Developer/Owner-NTL Seller Type' Individual Buyer Broiler: JLL Listing Broker: Forefront Properties, LLC. Adam Cody Kevin Cox (312) 228-3985 (847) 272-4030 Sale Date: 0 310 7120 1 5 (1,176 days on market) Escrow Length: 60 days Sale Price: $3,600,000 -Confirmed Asking Prioe: 3750000 Price/AC Land Gross' $720,000.00 ($16.531SF) Zoning: R-1 Transaction Details ID: 3259289 Sale Type: Investment Land Area. 5 AC (217,800 SFy Proposed Use: Commercial, Hold for Development Percent Improved. m Total Value Assessed: $150,053 in 2013 Improved Value Assessed - Land Value Assessed: $160,063 Land AssessedlAC: $30,012 Street Frontage: 519 feet on E Rand Rd Off -Site Improv: Curblautter/Sidewalk, Electricity, Gas, Server, Streets, Water Parcel No: 03-35-302-006-0000, 03-35-302.007-0000 �Per.KeVill11 Document ND: 1506833007 Yja for Irlill IiOf'"`CIIDIf7RCft�. Copyrighted report licensed to MB Financial Bank - 126116 212712016 Page 1 Sal E Rand Rd Commercial Land of 5 AC {217,800 SF} (can't) SOLD Transaction Notes On March 2, 2015, 5 acres of land located at 801 E Rand Rd in Mount Prospect, IL was sold out of a private trust held for Joseph Miceli to Speedwagon Properties for $3,600,000 or approximately $720,000 per acre, The buyer has plans to construct a retail development with pad and multi -tenant buildings. Kevin Cox of Forefront Properties, LLC represented the seller in the transaction and Adam Cody of JLL represented the buyer. JLL is also marketing the proposed retail space on CoStar for the buyer. See CoStar property ID# 9590577. All of the provided information was verified by examining public record and interviewing buyer and seller contacts deemed reliable. Current Land Information _ID: 8738351 Zoning. R-1 Proposed Use: CommerciallHold for Development Density Allowed: - Land Area: 5 AC (217,800 SF) Number of Lots: - On -Site Improv: - Max # of Units: - Lot Dimensions: - Units per Acre: - Owner Type: Developer/Owner-NTL Improvements: - Off -Site Improv: CurblGutterlSidewalk, Electricity, Gas, Sewer, Streets, Water Street Frontage: 519 feet on E Rand Rd Traffic Count 30,000 cars per day on E Rand Rd Metro Market: Chicago Submarket: NorthwestJSchaumburg Area County; Cook CBSA: Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI CSA: Chicago -Naperville, iL-IN-WI DMA: Chicago, IL -IN Land Notes Commercial I Redevelopment Site; Former Automotive SaleslService Facility; Excellent Visibility on Rand Road; Traffic Counts of 30,000 vehicles daily along Rand Road. Copyrighted report licensed to MB Financial Bank -12641E 212 712 0 1 6 Page 2 801 E Rand Rd SOLD Commercial Land of 5 AC (217,800 $F) {can't) Parcel Number: 03-35-302-006-0000, 03-35-302-007-0000 Legal Description' - County: Cook Plat Map: 801 E Rand Rd ST 478 M Mwids )f tho SW V, Rec, IM BWG- 1 9 2 101 10141 9 4 /A ft AA 'DO,, BLDG, 2 x 2 -07 9, kL CONDO. a HENRY STI Copyrighted report licensed to MB Financial Ban k - 12&416 212712016 Page 3 1149 W Golf Rd Schaumburg, IL 60194 Sale on 711!2813 for $2,300,000 ($255.5&SF) - Research Complete 8,000 SF - Sold for Land Value, Demolished Retail Restaurant Building Demolished Recorded Buyer: Muller Realty II, LLC True Buyer: Acura Scott Muller 1099 W Higgins Rd Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 (847) 519-9550 Buyer Type: CorporatelUser Buyer Broker: Adelphia Properties George Spirrison (630) 455-4495 Simeon Spirrison (630) 455-4495 Sale Date: 07/01/2013 Escrow Length: 30 days Sale Price: $2,300,000 -Confirmed Asking Price: - PdcelSF: $255.56 PrioelAC Land Gross. $686,567.16 Percent Leased: 100.0% Tenancy: Single Sale Conditions. Redevelopment Project 9,eii Ln c` m L7 !U �}�i mffnt Rd w lswl C knaifeVr�{,jy�� wo)n.1Dr J:Thn Dr E-_19IIti, M (.Aa:A'( Transaction Details ID 28D5901 Financing: Down payment of S2,300,000.00 (100.0% Parcel No. 07-16-100-011-0000 Document No:/320312000 Sale Type: Owner/User I N1iCFp}Dft' Retail - Restaurant Virtual Earth'g �J—t GLA: 9,000 SF Buyer & Seller Contact Info 3.35 AC (145,928 SF) Recorded Seller: Chicago Title Land Trust Company, T# 1092985 True Seller: George Metropulos George Metropulos 710 Ambria Or Mundelein, IL 60060 (847) 970-7783 Seller Type. CorporatedUser Listing Broker: Adelphia Properties George Spirrison (630) 455-4495 Simeon Spirrison (630) 455-4495 Transaction Details ID 28D5901 Financing: Down payment of S2,300,000.00 (100.0% Parcel No. 07-16-100-011-0000 Document No:/320312000 Sale Type: Owner/User Bldg Type: Retail - Restaurant Year Built/Age: Age: 32 GLA: 9,000 SF Land Area: 3.35 AC (145,928 SF) Percent Improved: 5.5% Total Value Assessed: $323,996 in 2011 improved Value Assessed 517,688 Land Value Assessed: $306,308 Land AssessedlAC: S91,435 m R m mi ullr:ul ima" C i ll " alue, at $15.76, Flea' ,saIe a pw airtd ajust mmlaaml for airm- rvaved market Conditins). Copyrtghted report licensed to WS Financial Sank - 128418 2125/2016 Page 1 1149 W Golf Rd SOLD 9,000 SF - Sold for Land Value, Demolished Retail Restaurant Building Demolished [can't] Transaction Notes On July 1, 2013, the 9,000 SF retail building an 3.4 acres located at 1149 W Golf Road, Hoffman Estates, IL 60169 sold for $2,300,000 in an ownerluser sale. The property was formerly a restaurant and vacant at the time of the sale. The buyer pians to redevelop the property into an auto dealership. The property was on the market for 2 months, and the transaction was in escrow for approximately 30 days, This transaction was an all cash deal The brokers were dual agents, One of the brokers stated that the buyer was attracted to the corner lot location, which is ideal for an auto dealersNp, AddIftiona1y, another high-end auto de3ier$hJp opened recently within close proximity to the property. Detailsof the transaction were verified by one of the brokers, elllle Income Expense ata . . . . ....... . . . . ......... . Expenses Taxes $119,091 Operating Expenses Total Expenses $119.091 Current Retail Information ID: 61. Property Type: Retail - Restaurant GLA -1 9,000 SF Center: - Total Avail: 0 SIF Bldg Status: Demolished % Leased: 0.0% Owner Type: CorporatelUser Bldg Vacant: 0 SF Zoning: - Land Area: 3.35 AC Owner Occupied-. No Lot Dimensions: - Building FAR: 0.06 Rent/SF/Yr: - No. of Stores. - CAM: - Street Frontage. 375 feel on Golf Rd (with 0 curb cut) 390 feet an Gannon Dr 399 feet an W Golf Rd Expenses: 2014 Tax @ $11,87tsf Parking: 200 free Surface Spaces are available Features: Pylon Sign Location Information Second Address: 1149 W Golf Rd Metro Market: Chicago Submarket: NorthwastJSchaumburg Area County: Cook CBSA: Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI CSA: Chicago -Naperville, IL -IN -WI DMA: Chicago, IL -IN Copyrighted report licensed to MB Financial Bank - 126416 212512016 Page 1149 W Ga01f Rd SOLD 9,000 SF , Sold for Land Value, Gernolished Retail Restaurant Building DenWollshed (oonl) Property Notes " Location, Location, Location!!! " Located Nearby Woodfield Mall, Higgins Rd, 1-90, & 1-290. " Situated On a Busy Hard Coater Stoplight Signalized Intersection of Heavily Traveled Thoroughfare an Golf Rd * Outstanding Opportunity to Redevelop the Hard Corner Site or Turnkey Operation or Bring your Own Concept. " Excetient Frontage & High Visibility Location on a Major Retail Cori Corridor. " Plenty of National Tenants Surround the Area. " Outstanding High Traffic Flow at Your Footsteps. `Traffic Counts of Over 33,300 VPD Pass by the Site. " Densely Populated Area with Strong Outstanding Demos & Incomes in Desirable Hoffman E=states Location. " Well Populated, High Income Residential Base. " Excellent Trade Area Buying Power. • Ample Residential Rooftops Surround the Site. " 30 Minutes from Downtown Chicago. Copyrighted report licensed to MB Mnandei Bank -12&116 V2512016 Page 3 Copyriphhad report Ilcwsad to MB Financial Balk -12&116. 21251241 Page 4 u 20383 N Rand Rd, Klldeer, IL 60047 Sale on 1123x1015 for $2,500,000 ($718,380.801AC) - Research Complete Commercial Land of 3.48 AC (151,589 SF) Recorded Buyer Kildeer Village Square LIG True Buyer•. Midwest Commercial Realty Scott Stefanik 1415 W 22nd St Oak Brock, IL 60523 (630) 573-2920 Bond Capital Ltd ;1rC Robert Bond 350 W Hubbard St yet[ Qr Chicago, IL 60654 ud Shirley Rd (312)B53-0070 Buyer Type: DeveloperlOwner-RGNL r vr�u Investment Manager Buyer Broker•. No Buyer Broker on Deal Sale Date 01123/2015 Escrow Length: 90 days Sale Price: 52,500,000 -Confirmed Price/AC Land Gross: $718,390.80 ($16.49)SF) Zoning: B2 Parcel No: 14-34-401-003,14-34-401-005 Document No: 7172139 SOLD Seller Type: CorporatelUser Listing Broker: No Listing Broker on Deal Transaction Details ID: 3251791 Sale Type: Investment Land Area: 3.48 AC (151,589 SF) Proposed Use: - Percent Improved: .- Total Value Assessed: $252,451 in 2013 Improved Value Assessed - Land Value Assessed: $252,451 Land Assessed/AC: $72,543 Copydghted report Ikensed to ma Financial Sank - 126416. 212 912 0 1 6 Page 1 , N •�"da�4ti"�r ;1rC yet[ Qr ud Shirley Rd Park r vr�u P v 7 W 1� Hand Ct E r a twmy � ... 5JJ yds ..r' ' � t kkIII �1 a �L VIAL tit,t°r�'il Gaf LIITM ���'�] �i1 4 �"�r'r'•r�� 7� rel%TJ. J:. iJ y, Buyer & Seller Contact Info Recorded Seller: Rang L & Mei L Huang True Seller•. Rong L & Mei L Huang Rong Haung 2143 Ronda Granada Laguna Beach, CA 92637 Seller Type: CorporatelUser Listing Broker: No Listing Broker on Deal Transaction Details ID: 3251791 Sale Type: Investment Land Area: 3.48 AC (151,589 SF) Proposed Use: - Percent Improved: .- Total Value Assessed: $252,451 in 2013 Improved Value Assessed - Land Value Assessed: $252,451 Land Assessed/AC: $72,543 Copydghted report Ikensed to ma Financial Sank - 126416. 212 912 0 1 6 Page 1 20393 N Rand Rd Commercial Land pf 3.4a AC (151,589 SF) (Con"t) Transaction Notes On 1123/2015 the 3.48 acres at 20393 N Rand Rd in Kildeer, IL sold for $2,500,000 or $718,390.80 per acre. The land is zoned commercial, all usable and has 50,400 square feet of frontage an Rand Rd. The transaction was under contract for 90 days. The buy is in the planning stages for development. There were no brokers involved in this transaction. All information was confirmed the buyer and public record. Current tend Inforrnatlon Zoning: 82 Density Allowed: - Number of Lots: Max # 0f Units: - ..._. Units per Acre: - Improvements: Traffic Count: 50,400 cars per day on Rand Rd Metro Market: Chicago Submarket: NorthwestJCentral Northwest County: Lake CBSA: Chicago -Naperville -Elgin, IL -IN -WI CSA: Chicago -Naperville, IL -IN -WI DMA: Chicago, IL -IN Proposed Use - Land Area: 3.48 AC (151,589 SF) On -Site Improv: - 'LGt D1h1ertSi0f : -.-. ,.,,,,,..m ,, -.... Owner Type: Investment Manager Copyrighted report licenaed in MB Finenclal Bank - 128416 �l e 10: 9099331 ?!291207 6 Page 2 P� Copynghted report licensed to M6 Financial Bank - 126416 2f29INI B Page 3 14) Station Location Study Mount Prospect Fire Department Created by: Illinois Fire Chiefs Association Mount Prospect Fire Department Mission Statement: To protect people, property, and the environment by reducing and controlling fire loss, providing emergency medical service, maintaining adequate emergency preparedness, and engaging in fire prevention and public education activities. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 It Terms of Use Illinois Fire Chiefs Association (IFCA) prepared this report which contains confidential and proprietary trade secrets and commercial information of the IFCA and may not be disclosed or republished. Violation of the confidentiality of this record will cause significant financial harm to the Illinois Fire Chief Association. This report is the copyright of the Illinois Fire Chiefs Association which is protected by State and Federal copyright laws. No part of the document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronically or mechanically, Photocopying or scanning this document without prior written permissions of the Illinois Fire Chiefs Association is strictly prohibited. The use, reproduction, downloading or distribution may suggest you to the applicable penalties and damages under State and Federal copyright laws. Our Mission: The IFCA Consulting Team's mission is to support your organization's mission by providing you with a forward-looking perspective. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF Executive Summary pEP�. The Illinois Fire Chiefs Association created the following Station Location Analysis to provide statements of findings for the Mount Prospect Fire Department. By using nationally recognized and accepted standards for data collection and analysis, the report findings are of quantitative data allowing the Mount Prospect Fire Department to make non -emotional data -driven decisions and recommendations. Historical incident data was used to measure the Mount Prospect Fire Department's emergency services performance and compare it to NFPA 1710 standards, ISO standards, and CPSE recommendations as well as project performance in a fire station relocation scenario. The Mount Prospect Fire Department, current Stations location, meet the CPSE recommendations and are within a few percentages of meeting the NFPA 1710 standard for travel times, with eighty-eight percent of incidents within the four -minute travel time. The Mount Prospect Fire Department's District 13 is within three seconds of the NFPA 1710 standard for first -due response times with ninety percent of structure fire incidents having a travel time of four minute and three seconds. The current fire stations locations with a projected incident served surpass CPSE recommendations and are within two percent of the NFPA 1710 standards, and ISO standards with eighty-eight percent of the incidents severed. The fire station relocation scenario shows that the proposed station change configuration's projected performance of the incident travel times improved by eight percent; ninety-six percent of incidents are within the four -minute travel time, meeting the NFPA 1710 and ISO standards, and the CPSE recommendations. Station 13's relocation to 111 E Rand Road reduced fire travel time at the ninetieth percentile by forty-two seconds to a time of three minutes and twenty-one seconds surpassing NFPA 1710 and ISO standards, and CPSE recommendations for travel times. With Station 13 relocated to 111 E Rand Road, the projected model showed improvements in response times for twenty-nine percent of all incidents, twenty percent fire incidents, and thirty percent EMS incidents. The mean response time improvements for the affected incidents are: All incidents - one minute and fifty-four seconds, fire incidents - two minutes and eighteen seconds, EMS incidents - one minute and fifty seconds. The ninetieth percentile time improvements for the affected incidents are: All incidents - three minutes and forty-one seconds, fires Incidents- four minutes and forty-five seconds, EMS incidents - three minutes and twenty-eight seconds. To accomplish the improved performance projected in the station relocation scenario with Station 13 relocated to 111 E Rand Road, the Area of Responsibility (AOR) for all three stations must be adjusted for the new configuration. The fire station relocation study shows that the placement of Station 13 in any of the proposed locations reveals a definite improvement to the overall travel times and meets the nationally accepted standards and recommendations. A fire station built at 111 E Rand Road with AOR boundaries adjustment would prove to be the best overall location for Station 13. Using NFPA 1710 standards, ISO standards, and CPSE recommendation to measure past performance, this study has produced several performance measures for the Mount Prospect Fire Department. The measures were used in mathematical modeling to predict the performance of the provided emergency services in a fire station relocation scenario. The Illinois Fire Chiefs Association chooses to provide only statements of findings so that the Mount Prospect Fire Department may decide how to best serve its community based on data. It Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF Table of Contents pEP�. Section 1— Definitions 1 Definitions 2 Section 2—Jurisdiction Basics 3 Jurisdiction Area 4 Transportation 5 Section 3 — Service Area 6 Area Served by Drive Time 7 4 Minute Catchment 8 Streets Covered by Drive Time 9 Station 12 Area and Streets by Time 10 Station 13 Area and Streets by Time 11 Station 14 Area and Streets by Time 12 Area Overview 13 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF Table of Contents pEP�. Section 4 — Study Incidents 14 All Incidents 15 NFIRS Group 100 16 NFIRS Group 200 17 NFIRS Group 300 18 NFIRS Group 400 19 NFIRS Group 500 20 NFIRS Group 600 21 NFIRS Group 700 22 NFIRS Group 800 23 NFIRS Group 900 24 Section 5 - Incidents by NFIRS Code 25 District 26 Station 12 27 Station 13 28 Station 14 29 s.:., Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF Table of Contents pEP�. Section 6 — Incident Hotspots 30 All Incidents 31 NFIRS Group 100 32 NFIRS Group 200 33 NFIRS Group 300 34 NFIRS Group 400 35 NFIRS Group 500 36 NFIRS Group 600 37 NFIRS Group 700 38 NFIRS Group 800 39 NFIRS Group 900 40 Section 7 — Service Area Performance 41 District Incidents 42 First In — District 43 Station 12 Incidents 44 First In — Station 12 45 Station 13 Incidents 46 First In — Station 13 47 Station 14 Incidents 48 First In — Station 14 49 s;;,, Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF Table of Contents pEP�. Section 8 — Station Location Impact so Ideal Fire Station Placement 51 Ideal Fire Station Placement - District 52 Ideal Fire Station Placement - District 13 53 Station Locations 54 District Travel Time Comparison - Fire 55 District Travel Time Comparison - EMS 56 District Travel Time Comparison - Others 57 Response Times - Fires 58 Response Times - EMS 59 Response Times - Others 60 Hotspots for Fire Incidents 61 Hotspots for EMS Incidents 62 Hotspots for Other Incidents 63 Still District and AOR Boundary 64 Still District / AOR Travel Times - All Incidents 65 Still District / AOR Travel Times - Fires 66 Still District / AOR Travel Times - EMS 67 Still District / AOR Travel Times - Others 68 s;:., Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Definitions Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 MOUNT T PROSPEC Definitions Section 1 Definitions Alllncidents: All incidents regardless of NFIRS group codes. AoR: Area of Responsibility. Section 1 AW: Area workload is the percentage of a given time frame in which there is a demand for service within a station's AoR. Catchment: A geographical area based on travel time. Drive Time: The time measured from fire company en -route to fire company on scene. EMS Incidents: Incidents in the NFIRS group codes 300's. Fire Incidents: Incidents in the NFIRS group codes 100's. Historical: Incidents that have happened in the past. Data that has been collected in the past. Hotspot: A representation of an area with a statistical higher density than its surrounding area. Other Incidents: Incidents in the NFIRS group codes 200's, and 400's through 900's. Projected: The results that may happen in the future based on analysis. Response Time: The time measured from fire company notification to fire company on scene. Service Area: A geographical area where service is provided or demanded. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Jurisdiction Basics 14) Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 MOUNT T PROSPEC Jurisdiction Area Transportation Section 2 Jurisdiction Area 14) t Jurisdiction Basics Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Station 14 r 6 K""Nkw $W 00 Z to row Fit Pt E eoj,,Al 4, Ic Station 13- 5 W Mvftr#�-, Ov, Station 12 District Area: 11.0 sq. miles Still District 12: 4.1 sq. miles Still District 13: 3.7 sq. miles Still District 14: 3.2 sq. miles Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Transportation 14) Jurisdiction Basics Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF Service Area pEP�. 14) Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Area Served by Drive Time 4 Minute Catchment Streets Covered by Drive Time Station 12 Area and Streets Station 13 Area and Streets Station 14 Area and Streets Area Overview Section 3 Area Served by Drive Time 14) MOUNT T PROSPEC> Service Area ---- - ---- ---- - ---� 1 I i 1 min I� 1 min - 2 min 2 min - 3 min I� 3min -4min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6 min - 7 min 7 min - 8 min f > 8 min Service Area ---- - ---- ---- - ---� 1 I i 1 min 1 min - 2 min 2 min - 3 min I� 3min -4min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6 min - 7 min 7 min - 8 min dF > 8 min i } I i I 1 Station • 13 1t el' f -.I I I I Station i 12 t L i' I\ I � I Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 i i Station 14, 1 min 1 min - 2 min 2 min - 3 min 3min -4min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6 min - 7 min 7 min - 8 min dF > 8 min 4 minute Catchment N 7 - Station Station 12 MOUNT 0P ON T 1R0SPEC )&,T A Service Area Area Covered within 4 minutes 9.8 sq. miles 89% of Jurisdiction Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Streets Covered by Drive Time < 1 rw 1 min - 2mir 2 min - 3 min 3 min - 4 min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6 min - 7 min 7 min - 8 min > 8 min Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 !Y & E Ile 7-" qIIIIIIIIIIII low 11111111�11�lk W—Aond 1111111111 �, 1111111111�111�-"— ��—; 1��;�iris 111 IIIIII��i�: 1 006M!ri It1,l� ,�1�111� oil Station `�`!a �`.�.■ 1 ....�■��l Service Area ;rI-1p,A �.� � RMA Streets Covered within 4 minutes 206.6 miles 91% of Jurisdiction FIRF Station 12 Area and Streets by Time OE p'C It 1 N I tl 1 4 minute Coverage a I 3.7 sq. miles 90% of Jurisdiction ' Station I < 1 min 1 min - 2min 2 min - 3 min 3 min - 4 min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6 min - 7 min 7 min - 8 min > 8 min. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Service Area 1 min - 2 min 2min -3min 3min -4min 4min -5min 5min -6min 6min -7min 7min-8min dP >8min minute Drive 61.9 miles o of Jurisdiction Station 13 Area and Streets by Time 4 minute Coverage 3.4 sq. miles 92% of Jurisdiction N 4 minute Drive 70.6 miles 94% of Jurisdiction Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 NT PECT Station Mt Prospl 3 er Service Area ---------- -<1 min - 1 min - 2min 2 min -3 min 3 min -4 min 4 min -5 min 5 min -6 min 6 min -7 min 7 min -8 min > 8 min 1 min 1 min - 2 min 2 min - 3 min 3 min - 4 min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6 min - 7 min 7 min - 8 min > 8 min ---------- -<1 min - 1 min - 2min 2 min -3 min 3 min -4 min 4 min -5 min 5 min -6 min 6 min -7 min 7 min -8 min > 8 min Station 14 Area and Streets by Time 4 Minute Coverage 2.2 sq. miles 69% of Jurisdiction N 1 4 minute Dri% 39.5 miles 69% of Jurisdici It 4 -10 ONT PAOSPEC Service Area Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 < 1 min 1 min - 2min 2 min - 3 min 3 min - 4 min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6 min - 7 min 7 min - 8 min >8min 1 min dr 1 min -2 min 2 min - 3 min 3 min - 4 min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6min -7min 7 min - 8 min lP > 8 min Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 < 1 min 1 min - 2min 2 min - 3 min 3 min - 4 min 4 min - 5 min 5 min - 6 min 6 min - 7 min 7 min - 8 min >8min FIRE Area Overview Service Area pEP�. 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 4 min Area % of Area 4 min Drive % of Streets Sq. Miles w/in 4 min Miles w/in 4 min District 9.8 89% 206.6 91% Station 12 3.7 90% 61.9 83% Station 13 3.4 92% 70.6 94% Station 14 2.2 69% 39.5 69% 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Study Incidents 14) Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 MOUNT T PROSPEC All Incidents NFIRS Group 100 NFIRS Group 200 NFIRS Group 300 NFIRS Group 400 NFIRS Group 500 NFIRS Group 600 NFIRS Group 700 NFIRS Group 800 NFIRS Group 900 Section 4 All Incidents 0 MOUNT T PROSPEC .` 0 Study Incidents r! ;�v. �= stations • t �3. �.. 1 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Incident Data Source: Mount Prospect Fire Department Time Period: Jan 2014 — Dec 2017 Total Incidents: 23,676 Incidents Inside District: 20,929 fIRF NFIRS Group 100 Study Incidents pEP�. Brush or brush -and -grass mixture fire 12 Building fire 56 Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue 3 Commercial Compactor fire, confined to rubbish 2 Cooking fire, confined to container 55 Cultivated vegetation, crop fire, other 1 Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire 24 Fire in portable building, fixed location 4 Fire, other 25 Fires in structure other than in a building 5 Forest, woods or wildland fire 1 Grass fire 2 Mobile property (vehicle) fire, other 1 Natural vegetation fire, other 31 Off-road vehicle or heavy equipment fire 1 Outside equipment fire 6 Outside rubbish fire, other 10 Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire 20 Outside storage fire 1 Passenger vehicle fire 26 Rail vehicle fire 1 Road freight or transport vehicle fire 7 Special outside fire, other 4 Trash or rubbish fire, contained 2 Grand Total 300 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 MOUNT NFIRS • • 200 PROSPEC 14) Excessive heat, scorch burns with no ignition Fireworks explosion (no fire) Overpressure rupture from steam, other Overpressure rupture of steam boiler Overpressure rupture, explosion, overheat other Grand Total Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 12 18 Study Incidents FIRF NFIRS Group 300 pEP�. Emergency medical service incident, other 15 EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 15002 Extrication, rescue, other 1 Lock -in (if lock out , use 511) 8 Medical assist, assist EMS crew 7 Motor vehicle accident with injuries 750 Motor vehicle accident with no injuries. 117 Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) 77 Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator 137 Rescue, EMS incident, other 329 Search for lost person, other 1 Trench/below-grade rescue 1 Water & ice -related rescue, other 4 Grand Total 16449 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Study Incidents FIRF NFIRS Group 400 pEP�. Accident, potential accident, other 1 Arcing, shorted electrical equipment 84 Breakdown of light ballast 4 Building or structure weakened or collapsed 11 Carbon monoxide incident 57 Chemical hazard (no spill or leak) 1 Chemical spill or leak 3 Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 6 Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other 106 Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 200 Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill 13 Hazardous condition, other 21 Heat from short circuit (wiring), defective/worn 8 Oil or other combustible liquid spill 3 Overheated motor 29 Power line down 89 Toxic condition, other 3 Vehicle accident, general cleanup 2 Grand Total 641 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Study Incidents FIRF NFIRS Group 500 pEP�. Animal problem 1 Assist invalid 167 Assist police or other governmental agency 33 Cover assignment, standby, moveup 1134 Defective elevator, no occupants 276 Lock -out 107 Person in distress, other 6 Police matter 170 Public service 27 Public service assistance, other 30 Service Call, other 163 Smoke or odor removal 135 Unauthorized burning 3 Water or steam leak 71 Water problem, other 61 Grand Total 2384 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Study Incidents FIRF NFIRS Group 600 pEP�. Authorized controlled burning 1 Dispatched & canceled en route 1008 EMS call, party transported by non -fire agency 7 Good intent call, other 94 HazMat release investigation w/no HazMat 13 No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 269 Smoke from barbecue, tar kettle 1 Smoke scare, odor of smoke 119 Steam, other gas mistaken for smoke, other 7 Steam, vapor, fog or dust thought to be smoke 8 Vicinity alarm (incident in other location) 2 Wrong location 5 Grand Total 1534 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Study Incidents FIRF NFIRS Group 700 pEP�. Alarm system activation, no fire - unintentional 729 Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 180 Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 133 Central station, malicious false alarm 15 CO detector activation due to malfunction 100 Detector activation, no fire - unintentional 119 Direct tie to FD, malicious false alarm 7 Extinguishing system activation 1 Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 5 False alarm or false call, other 170 Heat detector activation due to malfunction 7 Local alarm system, malicious false alarm 4 Malicious, mischievous false call, other 20 Municipal alarm system, malicious false alarm 5 Smoke detector activation due to malfunction 148 Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 429 Sprinkler activation due to malfunction 16 Sprinkler activation, no fire - unintentional 27 System malfunction, other 100 Unintentional transmission of alarm, other 90 Grand Total 2305 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Study Incidents NFIRS Group 800 14) MOUNT T PROSPEC Flood assessment Lightning strike (no fire) Wind storm, tornado/hurricane assessment Grand Total Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Study Incidents NFIRS Group 900 14) MOUNT T PROSPEC Citizen complaint Special type of incident, other 39 Grand Total 40 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Study Incidents Incidents by NFIRS Code 14) Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 MOUNT T PROSPEC District Station 12 Station 13 Station 14 Section 5 District P NT T PROSPECSPEC 100 200 Incidents by NFIRS Code 3*3 I r ---^-..J •1 ��? AL 0 ��'• « • �!;• .• :•..�" Station ••i • I •� t14i i • 40 tea'. •i ..' ion �;�1 �•�•• �t t,—•� ! �. •i • I I aI _ �i 1� 0 I 11 7*27it j • 'i .I L--.-� 300 400 500 District Incidents 20,929 600 700 800 900 289 16 15826 623 1264 625 2252 5 29 1.4% 0.1% 75.6% 3.0% 6.0% 3.0% 10.8% 0.0% 0.1% 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Station 12 MOUNT T PROSPEC Incidents by NFIRS Code r-� I ; i t I � Incidents 8,409 i..1 ` Percent of District .:f ! . "" 40 a.. m •. ..�. '•, M• - r 6 0% 06 =~ � • • �-• • • , Mme• � � ``+w NF A.r.r i••• •. It Stationu; • _ ; • • %A m1.oo w +` jf••��w ♦ .! • • a Ike ••4w �� • ••• L Lo M � . 'nel to all •���M•A r•'� J • 1 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 900 133 10 6065 229 580 266 977 12 1.6% 0.1% 72.1% 2.7% 6.9% 3.2% 11.6% 0.1% ;;, Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Station 13 100 MOUNT T PROSPEC • • ii i —�, t ti I r. r •r Incidents by NFIRS Code Incidents 8,051 Percent of District 38% 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 84 4 6346 1.0% 0.0% 78.8% Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 241 439 218 708 1 3.0% 5.5% 2.7% 8.8% 0.0% 10 0.1% Station 14 Incidents by NFIRS Code --- -- --- -- ------- ------ --- � 1.� o" y •.•••Lr • i '•• t •t, Incidents 4,606 •. r Percent of District •' • '"o Sze � I 22% j •+ . •......r. 0 1 ap. 1 • • �, � • •� • I-❑ � =may •� r 1 • j M dba- • •Mf• •t• � � S111101.6 ryr E Ivi r • 1+ eAh 48 fee eiism 0064, ON* am ! • • Stations •• i • • X14 • • to • SII• } • • • a••• • i • it • • •• •• \A •••• • �. • I, w 100 200 72 2 300 3415 1.6% 0.0% 74.1% Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 • 400 153 245 141 567 4 7 3.3% 5.3% 3.1% 12.3% 0.1% 0.2% r • M Mir I f P,1 • • I 500 600 700 800 900 153 245 141 567 4 7 3.3% 5.3% 3.1% 12.3% 0.1% 0.2% Incident Hotspots 14) Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 MOUNT T PROSPEC All Incident NFIRS Group 100 NFIRS Group 200 NFIRS Group 300 NFIRS Group 400 NFIRS Group 500 NFIRS Group 600 NFIRS Group 700 NFIRS Group 800 NFIRS Group 900 Section 6 All Incidents NT PECT Incident Hotspots Station 14 Atprippw Station 13 Station 12 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 All Incident Total: 20,929 NFIRS Group 100 MOUNT T PROSPEC Incident Hotspots I t Station I r 13 I Station i 12 ti N F I RS Group 100 Total: 289 Percentage of District Incidents i Still District 12: 46% Still District 13: 29% Still District 14: 25% ;;;, Illinois Fire Chiefs Association ; 2018 NFIRS Group 200 tationft 1 J12M Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Li NT PECT Incident Hotspots Station II 13 NFIRS Group 200 Total: 16 Percentage of District Incidents Still District 12: 63% Still District 13: 25% Still District 14: 13% NFIRS Group 300 14) FIRF Incident Hotspots pEP�. C I , t Station I ` 13 .i , I F I Station i , 12 'I NFIRS Group 300 Total: 15,826 1, Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 i Percentage of District Incidents Still District 12: 38% Still District 13: 40% Still District 14: 22% NFIRS Group 400 �%JJ %Itpr6s Station 12 ti Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 St NT PECT j Incident Hotspots Station 14 NFIRS Group 400 Total: 623 Percentage of District Incidents Still District 12: 37% Still District 13: 39% Still District 14: 25% NFIRS Group 500 ----------- ru ti Station 13 Station 12 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 r Incident Hotspots Station 14 NFIRS Group 500 Total: 1.,264 Percentage of District Incidents Still District 12: 46% Still District 13: 35% Still District 14: 19% NFIRS Group 600 NT PECT %1tPrftP"t Station r; ` 13 I Station 12 L Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Incident Hotspots Station 14 NFIRS Group 600 Total: 625 Percentage of District Incidents Still District 12: 43% Still District 13: 35% Still District 14: 23% MOUNT NFIRS Group 700 PROSPE ----------------, i u �1 j r- i I F ! Station --------------- Station 13 Station 12 L Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 V Incident Hotspots Station 14 NFIRS Group 700 Total: 2,252 Percentage of District Incidents Still District 12: 43% Still District 13: 31% Still District 14: 25% NFIRS Group 800 14) 0 MOUNT T PROSPEC I I Station I 13 �' rJ 1 i i Station i ' 12 ti i Incident Hotspots ! NFIRS Group 800 Total: 5 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Percentage of District Incidents Still District 12: 0% Still District 13: 20% Still District 14: 80% NFIRS Group 900 NT PECT Incident Hotspots 12 ' 4.Staflon 13 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 NFIRS Group 900 Total: 29 Percentage of District Incidents Still District 12: 41% Still District 13: 34% Still District 14: 24% Service Area Performance 14) Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 MOUNT T PROSPEC District Incidents First In —District Station 12 Incidents First In —Station 12 Station 13 Incidents First In —Station 12 Station 14 Incidents First In —Station 12 Section 7 District Incidents MOUNT T PROSPEC Service Area Performance WE JI 6,I ----- - - — -- 4 Minute Catchment Q Incident Inside Catchment Q Incident Outside Catchment Multi -Station Coverage 99% Incidents Multi -Station 58% Incidents 2 Station 38% Incidents 3 Station Incidents Travel Time Within 4 minutes: 88% Historic Incidents w/in NFPA Response Time Standards Complete District: Fires 70% EMS 76% Within 4 Minute Catchment: Fires 72% EMS 81% Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 First In - District N r, Historic Ideal P NT T PROSPECSPEC Service Area Performance ♦I • ♦ti • o o rj �I L r.•� � �11���� I -w � •�M�t� Response Time (mm:ss) 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th 6:27 5:33 4:59 4:35 5:35 4:42 4:00 3:37 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 50th 4:14 3:22 43 FIRF Station 12 Incidents Service Area Performance pEP�. 0 Multi -Station Coverage i' 100% Incidents Multi -Station 97% Incidents 2 Station 3% Incidents 3 Station Vii'* •�+�w� � `i «. • ; Incidents Travel Time s Within 4 minutes: 92% — i ation� `i��M *a12 # i 1"046M 1*1 let 4 Minute Catchment Q Incident Inside Catchment Q Incident Outside Catchment Historic Incidents w/in NEPA Response Time Standards Complete District: Fires 72% EMS 81% Within 4 Minute Catchment: Fires 76% EMS 86% Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF First In - Station 12 Service Area Performance r� I i t I 1 i j• ,, i e f_ ----obw wmik , "T off : Lr. M• • +� � ~ � • • �-• • • 1 Mme• • � `'+a • • ..:'.: moi • al r`n its • Mahan a[Station a • = i N �...�� ..12 ••a .r• �. •• w•� w ♦ •: • • a Ike •••m �� • ••• �j M • � f•4J VK •ke • Response Time (mm:ss) 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th % 50th Historic 6:14 5:20 4:46 4:23 4:05 4:33 3:56 3:36 3:22 3:17 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 45 FIRF Station 13 Incidents pEP�. —`--------:------- --- 41 Service Area Performance Multi -Station Coverage 100% Incidents Multi -Station ' 21% Incidents 2 Station 4 Minute Catchment 4D Q Incident Inside Catchment j + 74% Incidents 3 Station C Incident Outside Catchment ION 04; �'• 00`! Incidents Travel Time r-�---+►�.,1 Within 4 minutes: 90% 14) z Historic Incidents w/in NEPA Response Time Standards Complete District: Fires 79% EMS 76% Within 4 Minute Catchment: Fires 79% EMS 81% Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF First In -Station 13 pEP�. N 7 Historic Ideal MA Service Area Performance 1i 0 lot, of& **4 too AND b I; � i ! �� •� •Y • d � � ,ice �, • ��•••�'• _ • . Stat=onOo • ot �'-,� • � � � l•-, �-i`.ai � j ! ~ice•! � � � � �`��� 1 Response Time (mm:ss) 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th % 50th 6:30 5:34 4:48 4:32 4:10 5:03 4:24 3:43 3:35 3:15 Service Area Performance 1i 0 lot, of& **4 too AND b I; � i ! �� •� •Y • d � � ,ice �, • ��•••�'• _ • . Stat=onOo • ot �'-,� • � � � l•-, �-i`.ai � j ! ~ice•! � � � � �`��� 1 Response Time (mm:ss) 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th % 50th 6:30 5:34 4:48 4:32 4:10 5:03 4:24 3:43 3:35 3:15 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 47 FIRF Station 14 Incidents Service Area Performance Multi -Station Coverage �0: 4%"1 .0 ='t'' • 100% Incidents Multi -Station .'' 50/ Incidents 2 Station ;� ,t # •, . 33% Incidents 3 Station ft 4"00 40 00 0 Incidents Travel Time ''• «'so #0w Within 4 minutes: 58% --- - s.. •; :• • , • • •� »• t . t. !� ► '� i ♦ _ • •''•' "• 8 ' •«» .•r.Stationj •' � i 0 46 14 N ' •� _ 4 Minute Catchment O • •N Incident Inside Catchment AL 0 Incident Outside Catchment Historic Incidents w/in NEPA Response Time Standards Complete District: Fires 56% EMS 68% Within 4 Minute Catchment: Fires 56% EMS 80% 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 First In - Station 14 FIRF Service Area Performance pEP�. 4' i �• s �M:,11 c�•� NMf • /� •• • • •r • • to- • • x 4 •.� < �• r f M M •06 F • • i• ii �+ •• �» •,A%, • • \A •••• � • 0110 so ONS r%�Y�1 r• arr � •�• • • •+ r Mals • a•! �••Ow,ow• i o ro '% 67, 1 • • • • _,1.•, •r r I � -------- ------------------ ! • • • • ar •a • • r r P.M4 4b •�, erre • • • ••.�.. air � M •er•i • •�rar ♦ i�,.•ryr f�• �r • • r � i s �M:,11 c�•� � •• * aw • � •• • • •r • • to- • • x 4 •.� < �• r f M M •06 F • • i• ,.n 1.. OU6 W6 • • \A •••• � • • • / . • • , • T • , . i • y • A • • • so • • .• a • • \A •••• � • • • / . • • , • T • , . i Ge AID j i 1• ,M • W. iiMM I i •i Response Time (mm:ss) 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th % 50th Historic 6:38 5:50 5:19 4:58 4:38 Ideal 6:12 5:46 5:26 5:02 4:34 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 M Station Location Impact MOUNT T PROSPEC Ideal Fire Station Placement Ideal Fire Station Placement - District Ideal Fire Station Placement -District 13 Station Locations Response Time Comparison - Fire Response Time Comparison - EMS Response Time Comparison - Other Response Times - Fires Response Times - EMS Response Times - Others Hotspots for Fire Incidents Hotspots for EMS Incidents Hotspots for Other Incidents Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Section 8 Ideal Fire Station Placement I MOUNT T PROSPEC ,l i ti I I v Y -- •-- Ideal ti, ! -- -- --- ----------� Station � I r I 6 K"46OPW k.. i V — ' 1 - :1 - -- ! Ideal ! -- i �- a Station Station Location Impact Ideal Station Location: The Ideal Station Location was calculated using ESRI's Location —Allocation Analysis tool. 305 possible fire station sites were used with a 4 min drive time as the cutoff to reach as many incidents as possible. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 't 'u�• t� , j I ------------• hit Prospect al •� • • • •f i 'I E Eusu � � } • • • •r : _ __I •_— _—_I 46Nko, t rvrptw� 4r.. '. 1 t_____.. ____--.-, I� • • • aj T 10 y Ideal Station '••.,•I' The map displays 305 possible sites. r - Ideal Station Location: The Ideal Station Location was calculated using ESRI's Location —Allocation Analysis tool. 305 possible fire station sites were used with a 4 min drive time as the cutoff to reach as many incidents as possible. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Ideal Fire Station Placement - District I MOUNT T PROSPEC Station Location Impact I ? f I I 1 I ir4�Mo.JU. Station 14 -� [M.t.Mnpwr k.. cft _ Y i Ideal' - - - Station --- -= - -- i i r I �•kr � T i � .� �•i ----- 1';-.., �, '►•, Mt Prospect j-�t -------•—� • • • •{. 1 � Stationy �- 13 ..i... .. ......., �1 v '\ a (-.l � • • �i • • • • • • • • • • • Olt \. VO Station •, 12 r I 1 Ir."p%- i—TA • • j The map displays Stations 12 and 14 .� along with the 305 possible sites. I `••1 etlT�" Ideal Station Location: The Ideal Station Location was calculated using ESRI's Location —Allocation Analysis tool. Stations 12 and 13 along with 305 possible fire station sites were used. With a 4 min drive time as the cutoff to reach as many incidents as possible. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Ideal Fire Station Placement - District 13 1 N Eudid Ave r—^ MOUNT T PROSPEC Station Location Impact N L Ideal Station Location: The Ideal Station Location was calculated using ESRI's Location —Allocation Analysis tool. 101 possible fire station sites were used. With a 4 min drive time as the cutoff to reach as many incidents as possible. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 W KenSingtori Rr�\ �- > Z ---- -� Fei"*.w Ideal lry isabeU Station#� j Ea _ ., ' 1 `�I w ��•v'�r 8u c se rk E Henry St I wee Mt Prospect E Busse Ave tP F E Evergreen Ave h t Y h Q 1 — c olo s t — �, > Loris Parr Q a ; N L Ideal Station Location: The Ideal Station Location was calculated using ESRI's Location —Allocation Analysis tool. 101 possible fire station sites were used. With a 4 min drive time as the cutoff to reach as many incidents as possible. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF Station Locations Station Location Impact pEP�. N 1 ti I r I I �I I I � I r , I . �------- - � 111 E Rand Rd 1 I � I I Gregory St j--------- Main St Ideal ir Station ' k � '1 I I Central Rd _ Main St 1 L 1 � 'I I L 1 I I �'k I L L � I yM1 l 1 L ;;, Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 2018 District Travel Time Comparison - Fires P NT T PROSPECSPEC Station Location Impact 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 90th 80th 70th 60th 50th 12 00:03:25 00:03:11 00:02:54 00:02:39 00:02:18 Ideal Station 13 00:03:23 00:03:18 00:02:45 00:02:23 00:02:20 14 00:03:53 00:03:22 00:03:10 00:02:45 00:02:22 12 00:03:18 00:03:00 00:02:37 00:02:18 00:02:15 Current 13 00:04:03 00:03:27 00:02:51 00:02:33 00:02:15 Station 13 14 00:03:53 00:03:36 00:03:18 00:02:50 00:02:22 12 00:03:25 00:03:11 00:02:49 00:02:35 00:02:17 111 13 00:03:21 00:03:12 00:02:44 00:02:15 00:02:05 E Rand Rd 14 00:03:53 00:03:22 00:03:11 00:02:45 00:02:22 12 00:03:20 00:03:00 00:02:42 00:02:24 00:02:16 Gregory St 13 00:03:02 00:02:51 00:02:41 00:02:29 00:02:20 and Main St 14 00:03:53 00:03:32 00:03:11 00:02:47 00:02:22 12 00:03:18 00:02:57 00:02:35 00:02:18 00:02:15 Central Rd 13 00:03:33 00:02:57 00:02:26 00:02:16 00:01:59 and Main St 14 00:03:53 00:03:36 00:03:18 00:02:50 00:02:22 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 District Travel Time Comparison - EMS P NT T PROSPECSPEC Station Location Impact 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 90th 80th 70th 60th 50th 12 00:03:42 00:03:13 00:02:51 00:02:31 00:02:22 Ideal Station 13 00:03:36 00:03:13 00:02:49 00:02:36 00:02:28 14 00:03:48 00:03:27 00:03:07 00:02:55 00:02:40 12 00:03:33 00:02:54 00:02:34 00:02:22 00:02:13 Current 13 00:04:17 00:03:45 00:03:00 00:02:37 00:02:32 Station 13 14 00:04:15 00:03:44 00:03:27 00:03:05 00:02:52 12 00:03:41 00:03:11 00:02:48 00:02:30 00:02:22 111 13 00:03:21 00:02:58 00:02:47 00:02:26 00:02:12 E Rand Rd 14 00:03:48 00:03:27 00:03:05 00:02:52 00:02:39 12 00:03:31 00:02:58 00:02:39 00:02:24 00:02:16 Gregory St 13 00:03:38 00:03:12 00:02:51 00:02:35 00:02:18 and Main St 14 00:03:49 00:03:29 00:03:11 00:03:00 00:02:41 12 00:03:33 00:02:55 00:02:34 00:02:22 00:02:14 Central Rd 13 00:03:58 00:03:25 00:02:49 00:02:21 00:02:05 and Main St 14 00:03:49 00:03:28 00:03:11 00:03:00 00:02:42 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF District Travel Time Comparison - Others pEP�. Station Location Impact 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 90th 80th 70th 60th 50th 12 00:03:49 00:03:11 00:02:46 00:02:30 00:02:21 Ideal Station 13 00:03:32 00:03:14 00:02:50 00:02:38 00:02:27 14 00:03:49 00:03:23 00:03:05 00:02:48 00:02:21 12 00:03:38 00:02:51 00:02:35 00:02:22 00:02:17 Current 13 00:04:17 00:03:48 00:03:09 00:02:43 00:02:28 Station 13 14 00:04:09 00:03:49 00:03:27 00:03:09 00:02:51 12 00:03:48 00:03:08 00:02:46 00:02:30 00:02:20 111 13 00:03:20 00:02:55 00:02:42 00:02:25 00:02:11 E Rand Rd 14 00:03:49 00:03:24 00:03:05 00:02:48 00:02:20 12 00:03:38 00:02:57 00:02:40 00:02:26 00:02:17 Gregory St 13 00:03:34 00:03:08 00:02:46 00:02:30 00:02:13 and Main St 14 00:03:54 00:03:38 00:03:18 00:03:01 00:02:37 12 00:03:38 00:02:51 00:02:34 00:02:22 00:02:17 Central Rd 13 00:03:54 00:03:24 00:02:52 00:02:23 00:02:09 and Main St 14 00:03:56 00:03:42 00:03:18 00:03:01 00:02:39 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Response Times - Fires • Station 13 (Historic) Station Location Impact N i • i 'I 111 E Rand Rd ® (Projected) .i Response Time (mm:ss) 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th % 50th Ideal 5:04 4:50 4:39 4:32 4:13 Historic 6:40 �l 4:42 4:22 Projected 6:40 \ 3:52 I \ I � I I• � • Station 13 (Historic) Station Location Impact N i • i 'I 111 E Rand Rd ® (Projected) .i ;;, Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Response Time (mm:ss) 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th % 50th Ideal 5:04 4:50 4:39 4:32 4:13 Historic 6:40 5:21 4:45 4:42 4:22 Projected 6:40 5:02 4:21 3:52 3:20 ;;, Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Response Times - EMS �•. U I C dpi X� I Station 13 +•a *� C�+,ii ,I (Historic) 4 \ I MOUNT T PROSPEC Station Location Impact i J • _�— �l7iilett = * •!li� rrr��_r'rr�—rrrr—�����' IE 00 $01 of \ • = s , p•► • GOt '`'`�rl��l� 'I � � dM•� _� Response Time (mm:ss) II 111 E Rand Rd (Projected) i#••i��= � w�w �,Ir •` • s d, co • , dl 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th Ideal 4:49 4:50 4:39 4:32 Historic 6:04 5:16 4:46 4:23 Projected 7:14 6:03 5:19 4:31 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 50th 4:13 4:04 3:41 a Response Times - Others MOUNT T PROSPEC S I X a L +� I 00 ISO O ° o °° l oo o•! Station 13 ; p, 0 `O �; 04; (Historic) [--i 0 00 ® 8 i 0 . °08$0080 ago`". i $ ` 0 0 8 i o 0 00° 0000 0 00 080 0o`i----- i '.o 0 060 0p0 08 8g@ 0 00 °000 e' °8o og008 0 � 08 o@ cn o €i 8 o c; ° °°° °eg8 8 °4900oo ° §0 o 8000 006 'z) i i qq i 0 �o80 o8$�00 0la$oo� oso$o08°`i �3s800 $�0 08000;4 88000 i i o 00° ° �e g�a' 000°898 ti ¢0 0 '00 ° 008°80Qp�860 o m<4 008�! 0 tt°oo888 0 �' ��k' 00 00 oxr ° -8$0 0 00°000 Sof-, �- _0.8 ,o, ��a oo i 00 0; 001 Station Location Impact I --------------------------- --i �i o i ti 000 i 8 0 'o o 0 ° 111 E Rand Rd 'o° Co °' (Projected) ? ° �ycl --------- 0 00 6D 0 00800°80® Cs° j ° 00°o °08 o °° 0 0 oS 0g g °° :\ ------------------ `;o ° 8 000 o 8% o 'Po 0 �i s,1 ) m °80 o 0°08°8 °880 ao i 00 0 °i ty 0 0 0 0 °o c� OO° 9 8° $ g o 0 0 0 o') i i> o 0 o�0a�mo$o q$o8Q00 11 %080 0g$°o�a$�po80'I `i 8�0 08000$0 $80°° 00 0 g 08Q) i <i Ab OTO ° ° O E � 8 p t`I ° 88 0 60 ° •ti � O S° O O O D �•�; Response Time (mm:ss) 90th % 80th % 70th % 60th % 50th Ideal 4:50 4:20 3:58 3:42 3:28 Historic 8:16 6:52 6:00 5:24 4:48 Projected 9:07 7:28 6:13 5:11 4:16 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 LI -El Hotspots for Fire Incidents NT PECT Station Location Impact E Rand Rd M1 PI -vest, Station 13 Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 2018 Hotspots for EMS Incidents | | Station Location Impact Hotspots for Other Incidents MOUNT T PROSPEC Station Location Impact I �I I I I I � I 7 I I 1 111 L E Rand Rd 1 I I r I 4 ~�M1M1� I k � '1 I I 1 1 I I Mi Prospect - �- L Station 1 , 'I 13 L 1 I I ''k I L L � I yM1� 1 L s;;,, Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 2018 Still District and AOR Boundaries 12 14) t 1, A Station rr 14 r Station 13 Station -_l, - "-12 J-. Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Station Location Impact Current Still District Station 14 E Rand Rd i Station 12 Areas of Responsibility (AOR) FIRF Still District / AOR Travel Times - All Incidents pEP�. District Station 12 Station 13 Station 14 90th 80th Station Location Impact 70th 60th 50th Still 00:04:35 00:03:42 00:03:00 00:02:37 00:02:22 AOR 00:03:33 00:03:06 00:02:48 00:02:31 00:02:18 Still 00:03:33 00:02:56 00:02:35 00:02:22 00:02:16 AOR 00:03:41 00:03:11 00:02:47 00:02:30 00:02:21 still AOR still AOR 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 00:04:03 00:03:24 00:03:21 00:02:58 00:02:42 00:02:35 00:02:15 00:02:46 00:02:25 00:02:12 00:05:12 00:04:46 00:04:26 00:04:01 00:03:34 00:03:48 00:03:27 00:03:05 00:02:52 00:02:35 FIRF Still District and AOR Travel Times - Fire pEP�. 90th 80th still 00:04:31 00:03:24 District AOR 00:03:27 00:03:12 Still 00:03:20 00:02:57 Station 12 AOR 00:03:25 00:03:11 still 00:02:51 00:02:32 Station 13 AOR 00:03:21 00:03:12 Still 00:05:12 00:04:55 Station 14 AOR 00:03:53 00:03:22 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Station Location Impact 70th 60th 50th 00:02:48 00:02:33 00:02:16 00:02:50 00:02:32 00:02:16 00:02:42 00:02:24 00:02:16 00:02:49 00:02:35 00:02:17 00:02:13 00:01:59 00:01:53 00:02:44 00:02:15 00:02:05 00:04:40 00:04:14 00:03:53 00:03:11 00:02:45 00:02:22 FIRF Still District and AOR Travel Times - EMS pEP�. 90th 80th Station Location Impact 70th 60th 50th 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Still 00:04:33 00:03:40 00:02:59 00:02:37 00:02:22 District AOR 00:03:33 00:03:06 00:02:49 00:02:32 00:02:20 Still 00:03:32 00:02:56 00:02:35 00:02:22 00:02:16 Station 12 AOR 00:03:41 00:03:11 00:02:48 00:02:30 00:02:22 Still 00:04:03 00:03:27 00:02:43 00:02:37 00:02:17 Station 13 AOR 00:03:21 00:02:58 00:02:47 00:02:26 00:02:12 Still 00:05:06 00:04:44 00:04:25 00:03:55 00:03:27 Station 14 AOR 00:03:48 00:03:27 00:03:05 00:02:52 00:02:39 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 FIRF Still District and AOR Travel Times - Others pEP�. 90th 80th still 00:04:41 00:03:53 District AOR 00:03:33 00:03:05 Still 00:03:39 00:02:54 Station 12 AOR 00:03:48 00:03:08 Still 00:04:17 00:03:18 Station 13 AOR 00:03:20 00:02:55 Still 00:05:22 00:05:00 Station 14 AOR 00:03:49 00:03:24 14) t Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 Station Location Impact 70th 60th 50th 00:03:02 00:02:39 00:02:22 00:02:46 00:02:30 00:02:17 00:02:36 00:02:22 00:02:17 00:02:46 00:02:30 00:02:20 00:02:41 00:02:22 00:02:03 00:02:42 00:02:25 00:02:11 00:04:36 00:04:18 00:03:53 00:03:05 00:02:48 00:02:20 RINI u - Created By : Illinois Fire Chiefs Association www.illinoisfirechiefs.org •1` l (847) 966-0732 Ci'd�dslivinski@illinoisfirechiefs.org Illinois Fire Chiefs Association 12018 'N V MUMMY I I "L IV SRT vy ..... ------- - -- - -- av I I Village of Mount Prospect >vrOwn prosp( Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM I TO: MICHAEL J. CASSADY, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR DATE: MARCH 23, 2018 SUBJECT- 2018 POLICE AND FIRE RELOCATION DISCUSSION -FINANCING PLAN Staff worked with the Village's financial planner PMA Securities to develop a financing plan to support the purchase and construction of a new Police Headquarter facility and a new Fire Headquarter facility. The goal in developing the plan was to work within existing debt levels to ensure the current tax levy plan is not impacted. Included with this memo is a final cost analysis for the construction of the two public safety facilities. Also included are two schedules providing final principal and interest scenarios for debt financing of a) Biermann property as Police HQ and b) Bierrnann property AND Rand property as Fire HQ. A number of iterations of the principal and interest scenarios were considered before settling on the schedules included with this memo. Cost Analysis — New Construction versus Adaptive Reuse This table illustrates savings that can be realized by the adaptive reuse of existing facilities rather than moving forward with new construction. The new construction estimates were developed by FGM Architects and were included in the Space Needs Study distributed to the Village Board and Finance Commission in November 2017. The adaptive reuse estimates were developed by staff with assistance from a construction management firm. Total cost estimates include the cost of construction, furniture, fixtures and equipment (FFE), design fees, and land acquisition. Also included in the cost estimate is a project contingency to account for unexpected/unanticipated expenses. Police HQ — total new construction cost for this facility, including land acquisition is $39,352,600. The cost for constructing a like facility utilizing adaptive reuse of an existing building is $29,468,186, a savings of $9,884,414. Savings are seen primarily in the construction cost and design fees. Fire HQ — total new construction cost for this facility, including land acquisition is $14,087,500. The cost for constructing a like facility utilizing adaptive reuse of an existing building is $10,378,000, a savings of $3,709,500. Again, savings are seen primarily in the construction cost and design fees. By choosing the adaptive reuse of existing properties over new construction, both the Police and Fire Headquarter facilities can be constructed for what FGM projected a new construction Police HQ only facility would cost. The anticipated total savings from adaptive reuse total $13,593,914. Once final construction estimates were established staff was able to work with the Village's financial planner in developing a prudent financing plan. The two schedules included with this memo detail the existing debt levels currently outstanding along with total overall debt service payments after funding the purchase and construction of the new public safety headquarter facilities. Principal and Interest Schedules Biermann Property — the first schedule details the impact to the existing debt levels of the village from moving forward with a new Police HQ facility. The financing plan includes the issuance of general obligation bonds supported by the refunding of existing Series 2009 bonds, use of capitalized interest in the first 3 years of the plan and use of reserves. The first two columns show annual debt service payments paid from property taxes and the annual change in debt service of existing debt. These payments top out at $4,547.535 in 2022. In the two years following, annual debt service paid from property taxes is reduced by $1,948,110 and $627,700 reducing annual debt service in 2024 to approximately $1.9 million. Annual debt service again drops in 2029 and 2030 by $962,150 and $1,037,375 respectively at which time the village would have no debt. Principal and interest payments -an -new -debt issued wHI-be added--only-as--this existing. debt -falls -off. Tha naxt twn nnh,mns hiahliahted in brown show the net effect on annual debt service from the refunding of Series 2009 bonds. Savings are front loaded in an effort to reduce annual debt service payments for years 2021-2023. The following five columns show net debt service after the proposed financing. Bonds are anticipated to be issued in October 2018. Principal and interest payments are identified along with use of capitalized interest in the first 3 years of the issue. The amount of reserves that are to be used to support the plan are also shown. The final three columns show overall total debt service payments paid from property taxes and annual change in debt service and difference versus current levy structure. The new debt service schedule mimics that of the existing in that no additional burden is placed on the annual tax levy and significant drops in the annual debt service are again reflected in 2023, 2024 and 2029. Biermann and Rand Properties — the second schedule details the impact to the existing debt levels of the village from moving forward with both a new Police HQ facility and a new Fire HQ facility. The financing plan again includes the issuance of general obligation bonds supported by the refunding of existing Series 2009 bonds, use of capitalized interest in the first 3 years of the plan and use of reserves. The first two columns show annual debt service payments paid from property taxes and the annual change in debt service of existing debt. There is no change in annual debt service amounts from the previous schedule and principal and interest payments on new debt issued will be added only as this existing debt falls off. The next two columns highlighted in brown show the net effect on annual debt service from the refunding of Series 2009 bonds. Savings are front loaded in an effort to reduce annual debt service payments for years 2021-2023. The following eight columns show net debt service after the proposed project financing. Two financings are anticipated to support the purchase and construction of the new public safety facilities. Bonds are anticipated to be issued in October 2018 and May 2019. Principal and interest payments are identified along with use of capitalized interest in the first 3 years of the issue. The amount of reserves that are to be used to support the plan are also shown. The final three columns show overall total debt service payments paid from property taxes and annual change in debt service and difference versus current levy structure. The new debt service schedule mimics that of the existing in that no additional burden is placed on the annual tax levy and significant drops in the annual debt service are again reflected in 2023 and 2029. Finance Commission Review Staff met with the Finance Commission on March 22 to review the Biermann and Rand projects and the funding plan. The meeting opened with a walk-through of the Biermann property. Police Chief Koziol and Mark Rysavy, Deputy Director of Building and Inspectional Services led the tour. The tour lasted about an hour. Staff answered questions on the adaptive reuse process and provided an evaluation on the condition of the facility. After the tour, the commission members reconvened at Village Hall to review the financing plan. Staff presented materials from the March 6 Village Board meeting and completed a detailed review of the budget and funding plan. While there were some minor questions that require follow-up, the general consensus of Commission members was that it was a responsible funding plan and recognized the efforts taken to keep annual debt service requirements level and ensure current tax levy plan is not impacted. A formal recommendation from the Finance Commission will be presented at the April 3 Village Board meeting. Please review the materials and let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, David O. Erb Finance Director u C LL O CLT u C 03 U Y w Ln CL CL O C E v a z i 0 i 2 S S S0>1 S o S c Ln g 8 S vi g 8 Ln o 1° n v a W^ r -4m o Ln I, o ry r Ln'i o n N n to ih iR 0 AI d N Af� ri ' a ui aC N C O! N � irN R in in iN iA N � C y Y C E n M 8Q inEL CML N Y S o g a _ § 8 $ 0 O Q " S S N o " o p OO o Ln m pp O Lr m 14 N 00 N 00 � W iRfli ih Z in O O in N C u S S c m Ln m Ln to o d n Z m m NC v DG Z u«i C O U �+ N C u uN OLn U M 0�0 « 0 C O O d c c °� .c-. 3 '-' N w ii O LL pp U N u C9 9 Z m c v O U Q m d 9 N U LL O d C Q u C LL O CLT u C 03 U Y w Ln CL CL O C E v a z i 0 i 2 S S S0>1 S o S c Ln g vi v Ln o 1° n v a S o a a v vLr O n 3 m ao m rT ri ' a ui aC N irN R in in iN iA N � C y Y N inEL CML S Y N O " S S S o S S c dg $ o g u c OO O O O N p g S S c m Ln m Ln to o CL n 2 m m +NiF Z u«i C u w Z 9 N N C OG t7 u S N sd OC t o N C C M r N p LL U O u > U Q +- N00 C W W Q f0 y C U LL 0 a O Q u C LL O CLT u C 03 U Y w Ln CL CL O C E v a z i 0 i 2 ss��sry$ssg�s�sss$��s oma o0 `e� NNN NNNNNN v mR$mSm�aS2R8 N— U N N N W �i .moi QWi M — �• c � Q c O~ X N N a A V Ol H Ont O 1� N S 00 10 O�0 N O aW0 t0 N ID �G N O E W��� T AI a R a hl M T T M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Di F � o N 4 N N N N N mu b S N O aW0 10 N 10 10 N O O v'Oi W N r 6 W 6 .-i ri ry � o Fzom .......... ...... o p N M O p .i n W 10 a � d cY a — -- a 2 8 p p S Oppp po 8 8 p S p p ,,. N N N N N N N N N N N p mppp N 00 oNp O o�0 N �G 10 N O O O A N N 'aNl N N 'aNl 'aNi N N N N t0 n 1p W O - N Cp I� N T N N uV " SoBSSSS88Oo88o8 vi o ' vi ooWp vi vi ll� o .n 6 a' 'I N N N N N N N N b. H w n ti o N yyy � .i Mj e v+ � u ' m.Y O N m op ri ry N T Q N I� u a K 0 2 Hplo 00pp � T M N a sail � O^1 Ol Om1 O�i n 0 Iri N K '3 y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W N NN N N N N W NG N GN � d H LL O v� INn 'a N m a a ry e- o co $ o m o o m m m m v N of ri ri n n M n n of m v. ri n n v w ` N O U Mr N^ O O^ y O 1� O O m N !� Q O m tOD S Q IpD_ O tpD_ m N N Y V C❑ o r IND l0 r r' N U � � aN Q U � . S m g om o m oo g a f 0 0 0 0' O ° J m N' Q � '� ri ri v a d n n ri ri n ri ri ri 0 n vi ri n n ri n n 0 ri +•i ri �. a m w F R a g w r. 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0o r ee m � �= om o a v a g a oa g oa g n m loe o om R om o m oo � m n �, � � 2 � Y 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 o m Q to V • h N h m h N N N m N N m rA N N N m N N N_ f- 8 a E � a N » o d C o ° � = u � a t < N , , , , , , , , , , , p o O0 C m N ss s • « m r o s N m C m m _ v m E r o 0 o o o o p p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 000 p o p o m p o o N o 0 o E y A < 0 0 S O 0 0 0 0 Q m Y m m O N N N N N MY ci d N b ,° N S m m In N m m N N O N N m S O ,(O1f O N N O W � o m m Ip IND 10 b tp0 t0 m O< m N N N m a D In s r e r + o 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o O pO o o Q❑ m o p o 0 o p o o_ p p o 0 o Si a mmmmoam���N�mm c n m a � � d d g v o c . . . . , . r . . . . . c • . . , . . . . 0O `u _ N t N D O m r m N L 2 C U y 3 pO pO o o pO 0 O p_ E ` p S 0 0 S S O O m 0 0 0 00 S 0 p O o 0 O 81o. T U N N A m A A m r r m m r m W ^ N r m � Q O m m m m m m r r m W � J p £ m a . 0O o 0 0 p o 0 0 p pO o p a gg °' I+ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 LL 6 ❑ .i3N O O -6< _ m r r m rIn ' C , atooW ver r, . ca zn S � o s Ll Eaq omd L � M N m M r m N m N O O m m . IOD I` . , , . , . . . . I . . V d L' O O r N N N Q N r N y C Ul N N N m m N so m E Q ' a m m J) ❑ M} m n d u li Y Q O O t� ,••,. r r,• I m K C a o A N O N vNi O n crr m Lli n' b W a C m ❑ 9 m o m N umi rn m m m o n 0❑ n U w (J a °� d _ m o. f°) m n = t t m c o d m m E 0 N t7 Q m N m m 0 N v m m r m 0 N ❑ m N C N N N N N N N N N M M to m N N NN N o n g m ry o N N o o N o o N N Z CDU �Z Jw� cE w m 0 � O °o U z w z CL U LU OL cn 0 ryZ N LU C� Q P U HOZ wC/i d2w Nw 0 LL C Z w Q CL 00 0 cY) LU Q n n LU ry � N c � ca X E o U- u 0 m +� J cn an= -0 J T -0 U w •E " ca O � Ov +O r ca to O _ +r c� �•v O� . O v LV CL O C 0.0 0 O z v C'1 w Y 00 �c ����,•a ca O _ W O v � 0 t CL cn U _O U J W a Y wUa =z� ~moo �z a O W LL C) a) LULL LL c � O ;+_r 0 CLLU O •� •v OU •�Cl) Q� � ��cn 0 U cn U � N c � ca X E o U- u 0 m +� J cn an= -0 J T -0 U l�, cO 0 O� �li� 60 O �li� s0 O� 91�� 1p O� 91�� 6p O� 91i� `r0 0, Sli l0 510-6p oN �0 ISl��!Sp O zsl�� 0 fa �l p/60 �0-,; Ln :�-, .Sp O fa O tel% Sp � �l O�lp o �O O i lid Sp 1 Oil fa O/ Ln ll/� 60 O, lli� `r0 O r0 pli� 6p � O� 01i� `SO O, 6p,� 1p 0, 6p�� 6p 0, 6p�� Sp 0� Ip O� pp,� 6p IQ- O� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o it In o In o In o In o In o Un o Un o p (O (O LO LO � � M M N N - - O O 4-1 °1 Q) Q) '� O ` Q) � c� O E 0 O O co _ L +-J Ln m }, N Q1 G Q1 +� N M O i O Q) (U X ro Q1 U. M C6 E� C�6 Q O Q1 N Q1E E cn i i X 3 oQ O v i Co O N Q Co ' N Co Q 0 u> O m 4A a1 roEj) N v O U •� Q (A roa, — Q �_ N i tL0 0 Q Co i m U f� a) - i L;-- E .N U >- � 4A U .N E� •— O Q1 �� Q< `� � � O C: Q� i +-J— U U Z) O -0-0 C6 O U.— U CO Cn 24 � O O Q > N +- = Q ' Q) O W U aJ a-1 - v +' E W `n i i c6N O X N 4-j O Q) I C6 i Q Q1 O Q U C6 X Q4-1 Q) U C6 = U a--� E • � ' Q) ru Q N > Ln C� G .2- N IWO � N E U 0-0 41 Q1 p Q) 4-j i6 -0 ) +� N •� Lnw 'v u O c6 E Co o ° U v i O "� Lr) O Z vi 4J Q 4J O N C:N a)ro N — E_fo ro CL 4-1 -0— a--� c Co Q1 � ' X O � X . Q-0 � •U U mi Z3 _Q E 'U 0--o a,��3.NZ3 a, N Q C: = N CL.Cn = C6 or Q C6 F--or-3 E F-- cn F-- Q 4-1 °1 Q) Q) '� O ` Q) � c� O E 0 O N _ L +-J Ln m O N QJ i G Q1 +� N M O i O Q) (U Q1 Q� E� C�6 Q O }; E cn i QJ O X 3 ?> O N o N Co Q Co ' N Co Q C6 _Q T U m CU 6 4- O E N v O U +� ro (A Q) O Q Q N tL0 0 =3 a--' • C6 m U f� a) - i L;-- E .N U 4A ro 4A U .N Q •— Q 00 �� Q< `� cn vO E N i +-J— U U Z) O U� O U.— U CO Q1 m Q > ,E Q O Q W U W CD c 6 C C C C Loi C n o d M m r, o o r 00 0 0i N 7 N Ln M n r4 � L^i W L!1 0) CU v) � � � 00r VA0 v) m Vf• c cu V} — U i/I• L _ m ? O Q Q Vi m 0 m Y V O O O O O O v o 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O Ln q O C O m `1� Irl N M c -I O .My N W iy 3 O uf• 3 v z C v 3 v N � N z C N f0 N Y C' vYi O C C f0 tic C 0 J 0 co W C Y Y A m 0 v A v c i Y O v�yy' o u cu U mu W C Y 7 0 W ti F m �'' n N 0 3 y c J 'm6 Y o 2 m 'i $ i y t ao v m C W v OL r C � ' V W OCL J 6 O O O^ O n a d Mn O Ln m M O W N 7 c -i � C � L!1 0) ti CJ C N N v� 44 C C' f0 V} — U i/I• L a m Q Q m O C Q Vi v Y VI O O O O O O = O O O O O D CO C o O O OM O O Ln N O^ u o m O. U N M c -I N N L1 M .., v� uf• 3 v 0 z 0 3 v z N � N C 0 O f0 C Y C' C 7 f0 0 0 co W C Y Y A 7 v 0 3 A v c i Y O 'i o u i 3 mu vYi W oa v OL m �'' a r V W GAJ O d J 'm6 d c6 Mr o � 0; N N M Y'a d o w W ri M as o W �nrppr Vi a7 ��pp W .m �p `Ow eeflpp W r. ��pp W m ��pp W o M ri Amy u�i a'i dap `Ow .� W "�ww N `•�' � v' -i w:nw q u� wwwwv q w� o ra 0 s+ 0 n an o r wwwwww g ev v m v m o w 0 m o v w v v ria ov 'j rL W Dw a a o a I� �4p Q n w r o a 44 O gq O r r o ti V n a h Y n v 1� V n v M Vr n v g T� n v K n v N� ---- v v N� v v K1 Of a o Or m— 0 p� rpWy� N pN N N N � n�i ry' pNO� [Vp�r O �rj oN pM yp�y7j rn m pn faA Qr N N [V N N N N N N N NI N N N N I`J N N N N iS1 N N m 11 w 10 fr DO w N h N N d o � o � m Lr; o rn LD L.0 W N O E N N X l0 N � 7 > L > Q v O O U- v v v v Z -i Z vi 3 U fC lD r•I O N fC C O co 7 _U f6 U i O X f6 v ca m 'a = O_ L X Q r•I � � 3 O O N O n m r•I f6 O ++ N O 00 +' L O O ++ � O GJ = U X Q M i- q 4 41 O ; (A 3 v v O U C o +s+ _ 4a fC y 7 3 i C O fC O ++ N fC r C C O O U 4a GJ i Op GJ CL = c M > O O GJ GJ � E E N i 0 ( O w n0 O Q Q LL Z ri N M O v s N c m N x (-D rn rn m p LL_ GJ � O O C L.0 Z L aj L- (6 Vf hp C EX i GJ N CA f6 � 00 0o n -a > m ca t/� � N O t/? 2 O GJ C U .o C 61 i (n +' •� N LL OC M U � U p cC CA X 00 N —ao oc 06' po a O ,y 00 o C 3 O t6 O H a m Lm GJ " (ALm00 X 06 � GJ 00 O > t/} o � o � m Lr; o rn LD L.0 W N O E N N X l0 N � 7 > L > Q v O O U- v v v v Z -i Z vi 3 U fC lD r•I O N fC C O co 7 _U f6 U i O X f6 v ca m 'a = O_ L X Q r•I � � 3 O O N O n m r•I f6 O ++ N O 00 +' L O O ++ � O GJ = U X Q M i- q 4 41 O ; (A 3 v v O U C o +s+ _ 4a fC y 7 3 i C O fC O ++ N fC r C C O O U 4a GJ i Op GJ CL = c M > O O GJ GJ � E E N i 0 ( O w n0 O Q Q LL Z ri N M O O m p LL_ GJ � O O C L.0 Z v � LL H t/� � O O C U .o C 61 C (n +' •� N OC M U � � J po a ,y a, o 3 O C O � GJ 61 O > o � o � m Lr; o rn LD L.0 W N O E N N X l0 N � 7 > L > Q v O O U- v v v v Z -i Z vi 3 U fC lD r•I O N fC C O co 7 _U f6 U i O X f6 v ca m 'a = O_ L X Q r•I � � 3 O O N O n m r•I f6 O ++ N O 00 +' L O O ++ � O GJ = U X Q M i- q 4 41 O ; (A 3 v v O U C o +s+ _ 4a fC y 7 3 i C O fC O ++ N fC r C C O O U 4a GJ i Op GJ CL = c M > O O GJ GJ � E E N i 0 ( O w n0 O Q Q LL Z ri N M N x x cXo N k k k k k k k k k k k k (h v� Oo rn M M so rn rn rn � r r -° O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 M O 0 In O 0 (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O 0 (MO V 0 0 ON M M V R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R go a w �v00(°(°(°�rn0)0)0)0)0)0)mmmmmmmmmm a �Nm 4LO(or- CC) cwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcw � QC:u ° ° «s > n CO cr w va 0) 00 T O T T T T T T 00 00 T T O (O M 00 O 00 O M O U N 0 M 0 f0(O M 00 a) 00 co h 0 M O M N O •L r C M h h N N N 00 N N O ' f0 T N M' O N O f0 O f0 00 T N'* T (D N h 00 O T T 00 N O T T O O O O O O N a a 0000 N 00 M h O 1* w M w O O_ w M h M 00 N T N G f0 O O N N h 00 00 T T T O O - N N M M 1* O W h h M T O O N O f6 >� N N N N N N N N N N 7 00 0) d F N e0 VT ER ER N to U7 I I IO O O O O O O O O M M 00 00 0 In M O W In o O c V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 M O r - o o M N V 00 O 0) CO- N V 00 V N N N V (O (O (O M 00 00 N N Ln - O 00 q O EN N V In 0 0 O 00 O 0 In 00 O In 0 N 00 N In M0 O N N M V In 0 r- 0 0 N M V 0 r- 00 O M V (O LO m o m m o m m (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r- r O) (0 O M IL N 00 0) U - N > M ER ER 613 0) NLfj r- 0000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 M O M Ln Ln O O) 0 O to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O N N O O v M (O r- r- Ln M 00 O O) � O 00 00 00 00 00 00 (O N In V � In � (O N O) In r -O). O 0) -0 O O Ln 00 00 Mr- O N 00 M r- M 00 00 M N 00 M O (0 N M LO (0 00 O) O N MLO (0 00 O) M V (0 00 O) Ln 00 ,( 5 Q. u In N (O (0 (0 (0 (O (O (0 r- r- r- r- r- r- r- 00 00 00 00 00 00 O) 00 7 + co V O C d` U U) va va v) S 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 o O Q M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O) (O 00 (O O O V N (O V (O O 00 O V O 00 00 00 00 M Ln M O M1 O. U00 M 0 V O) T M V 00 0 In 0 0 r- In � N N 0 O 'S`'S' O N O O O N (M V V In In 0 r- r- 00 0 O N (M (M Cl) Cl) (M (M (M Cl) (M (M (M M M M M M M V V V V V N M O O W C14 r- to N M V) ER V) M O O V V V O V (M . . (O M M M M M M M M M 00 Ln O d) O) O) 00 O O) (O In O) o 0.. O) M Ln Ln Ln M r- O) In V V 00 (O M 0 00 lfY O N (0 (0 O V M00 LO 00 r- (0 V V r- N O 00 00 00 MOO N N (M (M V LO (0 r- 00 O) O M M O N N N N (M (M (M (M (M (M (M M M M (Mm M M V V V O) 09 M 613 613 M -° O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 M O 0 In O 0 (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O 0 (MO V 0 0 ON M M V R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R go a w �v00(°(°(°�rn0)0)0)0)0)0)mmmmmmmmmm a �Nm 4LO(or- CC) cwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcwcw � QC:u ° ° «s > n CO cr w va LU 0 0 N N LO N N 0 . ° a a z t t O a Loi co co N U N O ON co co N N C C O >- Q Q N a) L6 C C U U N 7 .N U U LL N N C U C C C � L6 L6 0 U 00 00 00 oa m Ln L Ln C C C m N C j j w LL w U 7 p O O -0 C N p C E N N CL o � w co co cr t N CO 0 Cc,0 Cc, co O N U N N N L6 .5 N N (6 w N L6 a w � r U) N (6 � Z,�C" e U i)i H N 00 O) ON N M V LO (0 r- 00 O) O N M V LO (O 1- 00 O) O O N a s (0 a) N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M V V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O ..N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N w w@ LL a) F F LU 0 0 N N LO N N 0 . ° a a z t t O a Loi co co N U N O ON co co N N C C O >- Q Q N a) L6 C C U U N 7 .N U U LL N N C U C C C � L6 L6 0 U 00 00 00 oa m Ln L Ln C C C m N C j j w LL w U 7 p O O -0 C N p C E N N CL o � w co co cr t N CO 0 Cc,0 Cc, co O N U N N N L6 .5 N N (6 w N L6 a w � r U) N (6 � Z,�C" e Al 0 0 a 3 C0 ca L N Y R 140000000000000000000 IN 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00000 00 j - (O 00 (O (O N V O N 00 (O V N 0 0 0 O V N O r 0) O) Ln O Ln N 00 N Ln (O Ln Cl) O) Cl) LO V N r O) O) (O O r r r M In M N O 00 0 V O M M O M N 00 V In N V V V V V V V M M M M N N N N- N C � Ef3 1 691 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 �p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O fl- O O O Ln O Ln Ln O O Ln Ln Ln Ln O Ln Ln O Ln O O O U O N M N (O O) Cl) rLn O Ln O (O r V O 00 Ln 00 C Cl) Cl) Cl) V V In Ln (O (O r r 00 00 O) O O �_ O EA EA N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00o O O V N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M r- 0 r •> r L y, C O lD 00 lD lD N' O N W lD ' N O lD O O' N O M M rl� Cl) O O Q G) G) O O- OA - M M h 0) N-4 h 0) N le h O M W OA OA n O y (n M M M h 00 00 00 00 00 OA OA OA 0) 0 C C M N M Ln io W O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N- __ O a a a F- o 140000000000000000000 IN 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00000 00 j - (O 00 (O (O N V O N 00 (O V N 0 0 0 O V N O r 0) O) Ln O Ln N 00 N Ln (O Ln Cl) O) Cl) LO V N r O) O) (O O r r r M In M N O 00 0 V O M M O M N 00 V In N V V V V V V V M M M M N N N N- N C � Ef3 1 691 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 �p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O fl- O O O Ln O Ln Ln O O Ln Ln Ln Ln O Ln Ln O Ln O O O U O N M N (O O) Cl) rLn O Ln O (O r V O 00 Ln 00 C Cl) Cl) Cl) V V In Ln (O (O r r 00 00 O) O O �_ O EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 N ''' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O V U) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O a •5 - O lD N O 00 lD ' O'' O N O N lD ' N O M [- O Cl) O Q N >- M T T M r 00 T M T T h M N N �D n O (n O O N M M M Co n n 00 OA O- N Cl) Cl) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M O O io W O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N- � o asi a o ao O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W N N 00 N j O M 00 (O O O V N (O V (O O 00 O V O 00 00 00 00 Ln O N N N Cl) o U 00 00 r r M (O In V M N N O O 00 r (O V M M \ N C� o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v v Cl) N O O O M N O_ 00 (O V O V V O N O N (O V N N 0) In M M M 00 O O O r V O M 0 r r InM O) O (O 00 00 00 r r (O In M N O 00 0 V N O 00 Ln N (O N N N N N N N N N N------ 00 C C EA EA 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (6 000000000000000000 O' 00000000000000000 O U 00 M Ln 00 O M (O O M r O V O) M 00 M In � � N N N N Cl) Cl) Cl) V V V In In In M M r d r EA EA 0 0 0 0 0 N W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 o O 7 () U) M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M V O M +' OA cD 00 cD O O' N cD ' cD O 00 O' O W W W W M rl� O fn (6 >- M T T M r 00 T M T T h M N N �D O Cl) O Q O O N M M M Co n n 00 OA O- N Cl) Cl) M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N M O O io W O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N- LL 0) o asi a F- ao O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM j O M 00 (O O O V N (O V (O O 00 O V O 00 00 00 00 Ln O N M O V O V 00 V 0 00 O O O O rIn r N M O 00 00 r r M (O In V M N N O O 00 r (O V M M \ N N �3 �3 000000000000000 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O °- 0OOOOuiOOuiOOuiOOOOOuiOO o U O N M V In M 00 O O N V In r O Cl) LO r O N Cl) N N N N N N M Cl) Cl) Cl) V V O n 1 U U) H M c o N fn (6 >- 00 O) O N M V LO (O r OO O O N M V LO (O r Q a N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M N O O O O 000000000 O 00000 O io W O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N- LL 0) H n 1 m N N m o U � Uo a m e n °n' $ m m n til til v n rn v- N ok Ek ok Ek o 0 O -k ok o O o. o a .5c6 eS v v a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M a` c m m w m r m a o � o z o o om m . . . p v a ~ m o 0 0 o v U o � v > M M o 2 a` w N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m o w w 14 m ci oll }0) o o o § \ \ \ \ �\ !)k «§§ &:)®o »:& { /))!�`,!; _/,«_ 000 N N N N N N N N OO O N N N N N N 000 W O O 0 N N OO O O O r O ie 0 0 o O O O M ON-ONr W � � U O O U > O Q. �O O O N O� - NN O N (O O_ o M � 0 m m m V N o O a O N o O M -6 M N M EA (O N 6 M 4 fA x O W D fA � fA fA O N LL 0 0 fA O 0 Oo 0 N O N o N m O O O O M 000 O M N (O ON (O M M N N (NO N � a 0 0 V W M N W O E O M O 5o N O` 6I N N U U O CJ ) a O a N o O O D O 000 EA O 0 (O 0 O O M V O O o N M I O O O 000 N N O N N O O O M M V ONO O (V Ni O I� O (MO � M W (O N m N O m N (MO N V fA 66 666 EA O o O V o O (p N M M o OO 00 000 000 O O V m OO O (O M O r M O r O m (O M O O O N O O N Ni O (O � N O M (00 (NO M W N N m (O M S O m V V N V M O) EA N EA EA I� � 6A EA 0 0 O 0 0 O o OI o ONO M r N m o 000 000 00 00 O O M N ONO Ono O W O M Or E; 000 00 O N V M N m -MV 00 V V V V O) V N N N N N 0 -0 EA I� � 6A EA 0 0 0 000 O O 00 EA O O_ o 00 O I OFM O N- N M V o N N O 000 000 00 00 O N m O M ON O O) NO- O N N ooN V M V V N V (O M N M V N EA (O � EA EA 0 0 O 0 0 0 EA O O mo 00 oV OOO 000 OOO O O O N OO OO ON O N- N ONN NOO N O N N N NN (OO Mr •l •l - mOONON MV O) M M � V N M V (V (O EA N EA (O fA EA EA 0 0 O 0 0 0 EA O o O N o O r o M M o 000 000 000 000 O O N N OOM O M V Om M O V N V M ON N N I� N N O O r N O N - M O 0- O N O N- O N m V r V O O N M N V O V N N EA (O EA EA EA a JQx M W O 0 M V O N 05 05 0 C a OOOOOOOO 6I _X DC7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 V m U m FFFQ m U -o JnxS � LLl 1000000000000 M M W W W O N WN WN NNNNNNN WN 0N 0NN 0VN 0(NO 0(O 0M 0W NO0 (N6 WO -E' aLL r. O N N N N N N N N Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul .�... O O N � �• � O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .0 O N N (n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N m E U Y .� N 6I 6I 6I 6I 6I 6I 6I 6I wp 0 N w Q N O a aaaaaaaaaa a o� m uNi U 0 s flx-IJQ�S Q O m (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 (6 m w '6 N N O N Q -O LLl `o `o `o `o `o `o `o `o a a a a a a a a a a a N m m m m m m m m o¢> o Q U n m m m m m m m m n n n n n n n n n n n asi Y3 u a w v° O O O O O O O O N p =o=o=o=o=o=o=o=o ._._._._._._._._._._._ o s m Y3 4 ° � - 0 0 .r o¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ o o zwa 0 z>O 00 Ir N N N (6 N �p N o L N a d O N N (6 (6 > f O O L Q O LL' 4 O N N � U a ` � N O O LL 4 J U O L -f j d N 0 N � O � O N Q N O L E T O � �sU 0 o a T 4 O O 0 a Y 4 E O N N I N N � N U -_ Q NO o m N >N N O t O C � 4 O U ._ N o N N O Y N O N a N N U O N a O O 0 L (6 O � T LS _ _ m 4 O OO > O T - 3 N N 6 O a -O U U a NUl -6 0 N '6 Q U w JQJS5 m 0 O D w Y N Q 0 Q .0 LL U) m 8 N d- m Q C i N 4 N --a0-zw>o ie N N (6 T � v Y a � � � U U2 U > U O i O 4 a° L�5 o � 0 a 0 0 .� t o O a O N o O O s -6 O 0 m 0 N 6 M 4 fA x O W D N O N o Q LL' w o 0 O N O N LL o N O N z 0- O N Cd � O Ul 0 N U N Q m O O N Y 0 � N � a 0 0 O N 6I 5o N O` 6I N N U U O CJ ) a O a N o O O D N N N (6 N �p N o L N a d O N N (6 (6 > f O O L Q O LL' 4 O N N � U a ` � N O O LL 4 J U O L -f j d N 0 N � O � O N Q N O L E T O � �sU 0 o a T 4 O O 0 a Y 4 E O N N I N N � N U -_ Q NO o m N >N N O t O C � 4 O U ._ N o N N O Y N O N a N N U O N a O O 0 L (6 O � T LS _ _ m 4 O OO > O T - 3 N N 6 O a -O U U a NUl -6 0 N '6 Q U w JQJS5 m 0 O D w Y N Q 0 Q .0 LL U) m 8 N d- m Q C i N 4 N --a0-zw>o 0-0 a) = N u U U , >' O C 0 - SM SM qt N O N LL v v b.0 U O Q N U .I— a--+ a) CC SO 'a--+ 4-- O bo a) U a) 4' C > > N N +-+ O + O a--+ a--' U E E O ON a' V) O w a --J a� CD N mu E a) a) L aJ N p a -d O L aJ +�-+ O C _0 OL U a) L>' LL O N Q O bbn n m= f6 - N + 4, a) U V) _0 O N u N a, a) LL — � L 0?S c N _0 CD U (n O a) NO 4-J 4-) L N > N O L O aJ O +; c LL V O � V)4-) a •L O W 06 U O Q aJ •� U Ln � CD >' 4J N >- N —_ C: a) tO +-J U O (� L O v " -" O > O 0 �mN a �u��>O dA Q o a) 7;ap ` O .V N c� .� i V V ° i �'� 4-1 O M �� a, L o p u l]A U m �Lf �qA�> a) N� a� N N l] 4- L - m L LL + U o a cB -C LL o O U O +- U C }, `� —_ N �, a) o _ aj V)O N M O a)O 4-0 bjO N� Oa) 4o _ >- O O N O N a) O LL Ln++ E4-, O N •X N qA N VC.1 •� N y� t=i --J N ('6 (B 4-J LL Q f6 LL V V O Ln f6 U N N EaJ O W O$ aJ >�a) ap b.0 m L U > U Co '7A E d aJ Q co _ E O 3 a cn 0-0 a) = N u U U , >' O C 0 - SM SM qt N O N LL v v b.0 U O Q N U .I— a--+ a) CC SO O m o O oo i ca Q Q Q Q Q Q ca vi ro U U tao 0 Q � N a--+ ro N c6 N O v 0 O U_0 V) D E U � C:E OU — CLV). 06 V) O ra a -J r6 , U � ca N 4A +-+O ro O L7 N u ca C: 0 4A _0 N L'V }, ca 5 N > 0 -1-i ro0 .N -0 v V) U -0N 0 ca E '�O N ro C: _0cn N 0- Q Q C6 N O — +-+ N Q E 4A .O V) L.L Q 5 U U C O) N o0) c - m T o o o c cmi m U) o E o m = Qc oo Q- n c > - o 2--- -0 m(U �-0 E _0 O Nm c m , m a) z m m E mm Z± �� �� OQ Ecmc—) (nm c�oa>��nX�(D o w m c U Q o0 o O a) E .v 2D ~ o C: a) c m .� (n.� o co (n o_ N m D U m — m E '� m 0) E m> .S U � m m m a) a) a) c m �a)E —0 -(OD C-) (D ��� cm o' c�Qa�i�m E.c o (D -o c o0 O 0Q Oc � Oa) ao c a) a) o 0) )cOo m — � -0 O Y cm -Ocm ' >T Ln , cEci M-0 a) = a) a) U� c } > o c o m O' m �O >-0 zm O��mc_)mcn �LuScwE�� `°— E.> 6E �m0 mm� oi�'� u)oOZo cn — m s c o — E 0 .cn c C: c — m acne a' i 0 0 0� I Z c m E O� .o C-) U U— (n a) n O Z— m m E — OCoE O Oo 0' O O o O O Co I E Ln c 0c v� Q cn .v—) T E c O in E o��� o E � �� � c� Q m> c� m v o ZZ '� c m m � U LL m Q m o c m a) O U o Z cn WO <a >, _E O _0 'O O O O m — OUN C N cn cQ -O i f > i> O O m O O i n C x_0a) 0 a) > o(D o W �' �.> = m m m o� Q U o o m(D> m=o a) c U O m�> o.m -c-0 E ,---� a)-0 aa)) _ U > U 7 Q o U o> o m m o n O .� co 0 a) Eo c o oQ o o �' T C o w U a) E a) Q }' N cn U O cn — O c J 'O O Q> Q > m m -0 m m N n3 0 c — m Lo N N U: o v' c o.— o > cn a) Q 0 Q '— Z) Q o� � E m .� c o0 o m E z ami c cn of vi o E co m cc'o > � (n m o f T m m 0) o o co c o o cn cn � coo acn) m .� s o a) m� a) m_ -0 m O U) > m m=� o a) =o > > i-) -0 a) X 0- .� > (n a) N -6 > o c O) O o� L U N cmn o) N cn �O > m U m m U D m O a) >, m '2 E m U m C: Z� o °� a) m It o (D m a`ni T m m m= E O 0 m m� 0 }' (D E E �E (n2 C: ��� -0 ���� �m�m=T�m c o a) >.a) Z) o Qo o._ cn T cn c m (D 0) m'`� o ci m m� o u' m Q E ci o c i -C a) Q� o) m .� '� m o o m E O m m (n a) m a a) m o o n -0 cc .� O m o .2 �� E o c a) c Y y a) _ O U co Z) W m o c o c a c (n (n > 00 -0a)c-0 0)>,= ��omm0o> a_om og�mQ��m cn c:E —0m Q Cl) c — cn m c Q o m m o o Z m E m �' � .0 Q 2 U) O O) c N 10 0 cu O N>-0 cn s -0 cn U m U Z5 Q U Q cn .� m Q cn 6 W Z) a) —> o f a) .� -0 c m cn a) o m vi � W a) o-0 c cn 0 ci o v' O m O �m�o 'Fcmcnm�c cn c mm�c ow> cOm > a) mm m cn m � 'om m o E� o o � m o 0 C-) ZZ �moo c�E a U m 0 a)n ao—o o- O �n C: 0E n r >, E E z n O O O OcnOZ U a .— U a) p O O E ) U a) m O m `nc EoU cn c > > O � oE a) cn E a) o o U via) am 0) O 0 a) nca) a) -0 O c(D o_aac cmo�a) � cnm0 EooQ, 0 `n cau) U 0 a) z)cn> " 0 Q aN-6 2 a) oE`nm -0 Ea m � c-0 cO F m "— m 0- LL z3 m m 0- C— c -0 m E LL 00 C6 U C U m Q 00 0 N rp u Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department TO:MICHAEL J. CASSADY, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM:DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE:MARCH 23, 2018 SUBJECT:PRELIMINARY CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE STATION # 13 PROPERTY Attached to this memorandum is a conceptual redevelopment plan that depicts what could potentiallybe constructed on the Station # 13 property if the police and fire departments are relocated to other properties in the Village. In addition, I have attached a tax increment analysis that demonstrates the future property tax revenues that would be generated by this redevelopment concept. The conceptual plan calls for the construction of a six-story mixed-use building that would include 130 luxury rental apartments located over 16,800 square feet of retail space and indoor parking. This building would be similar in size and scale to other downtown developmentssuch as the Emerson, the Residences at Village Centre and the Clocktower. The attached conceptual plans are very preliminary and are provided to give an idea of what could go on that property if it becomes available for redevelopment. The attached increment analysis was completed by SB Friedman and demonstrates that theproperty could generate over $1 million in property taxes over the life of the TIF district.Discounted for inflation, the project is estimated to generate over $ million in present value tax revenuesover that time period. In addition, the retail component could generate over $60,000 of sales taxes on an annual basis to the Village. Staff will continue to review alternative development scenarios for the subject property as we move forward with the analysis of the police/fire department relocations. This review will also include the potential to combine the Station # 13 property with the adjacent Chase Bank property that is currently on the market for sale. _____________________ William J. Cooney Jr. / sten iw a m ------------- >++ -�----------- - - - -- I 1 i V I A - - - I9NINadd aD]Orvi =pgGC-IY — / xN,raga aaoDlno 3ogaa-lq ' w i – 7-4 — 4 L- -------------- 1 3? t' 1 5 3 l d Y n - ----- - jxx�uagd Nxwaaa3ann � - / j 7j— a I I OR L------------------ Ir i 1 U#U c Mount Prospect Police/Fire Station HQ Site TIF Projections Assumptions HIGH PROJECTIONS ASSUMING $37,500 EAV/UNIT 1 Mount Prospect Police/Fire Station HQ Site TIF Projections Incremental Property Tax Projections HIGH PROJECTIONS ASSUMING $37,500 EAV/UNIT 2 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT AND HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION NO 13 SUBMITTED TO: Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 FGM Architects Inc. nd 1211 West 22 Street, Suite 705 Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 Phone: 630.574.8300 Fax: 630.574.9292 November 10, 2017 FGM # 16-2164.01 nd 1211 W. 22 Street, Suite 705 Oak Brook, Illinois 60523-2109 630.574.8300 PHONE 630.574.9292 FAX fgmarchitects.com MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 ......................Executive Summary ........................................................... page 3 SECTION 2 ......................Project Understanding and Methodology ................... page 9 SECTION 3 ......................Project Goals and Questions to be Answered ............ page 12 SECTION 4 ......................Existing Conditions ............................................................. page 15 SECTION 5 ......................Analysis of Space Needs .................................................. page 19 Analysis of Space Needs - Police Department ............ page 20 Analysis of Space Needs H.Q. Fire Station 13 ............ page 25 Parking Analysis ................................................................. page 29 Space Needs Programs .................................................. page 31 SECTION 6 ......................Land Requirements ........................................................... page 65 SECTION 7 ......................Project Budgets .................................................................. page 74 SECTION 8 ......................Use Existing Building for Police Department ................. page 83 Reduced Building Program ............................................. page 85 Project Budget ................................................................... page 97 November 10, 2017 Page 2 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Introduction SECTION 1 The Village of Mount Prospect commissioned FGM Architects to prepare a Space Needs Analysis of the current Mount Prospect EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Police Department and Headquarters Fire Station 13. The goal of this study is to identify the amount of space that will be required for separate new police and fire facilities or a new combined police and fire facility along with the associated site requirements and potential cost for each option. Historical Data The existing 67,658 sq.ft. Police Department and Headquarters Fire Station 13 is located at 112 E. Northwest Highway and was originally constructed in 1993. Since the building was constructed, minor improvements have been made to the building in an attempt to accommodate operational changes of the Police and Fire Department. At this time, the existing building is less than ideal View Looking South in terms of interior space, work flow and parking. Project Goals The primary goal of this study is to identify the space needs requirements for the Police and Fire Department which will meet tablished by the Village include: 1. The study will be utilized as a tool to inform staff, elected officials and residents about the deficiencies and needs of the Police and Fire Departments regarding the Police Station and Headquarters Fire Station 13. 2. This study will provide the Police and Fire Department with an View Looking West opportunity to review their operations and identify items that will enhance their effectiveness. 3. long term planning work. 4. For specific building goals, the Village would like to demonstrate its commitment to sustainable buildings and depending on the location of the buildings, have the ability to host community events. See Section 3 for additional information regarding goals and questions the Village required answers to as part of this study. Methodology of the Study Process Public Entry Analysis of Space Needs FGM obtained information for this study through information provided and through a series of interviews and discussions with staff that took place over several days. The interviews consisted of November 10, 2017 Page 3 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS meetings with individuals and groups representing both the Police and Fire Departments. FGM toured the existing building and observed how staff members operate within it to gain further insight into operational issues and space need requirements. All information was gathered and then analyzed to determine building and site requirements. The analysis was then summarized into a projection of space requirements called Program Statements. The Program Statements are located in Section 4, of this report. East Elevation Fire Station 14 Apparatus Bays Lot Size Requirements The completed Program Statements identify the building size and site requirements. From this information, it is possible to identify the land requirements or lot size for each option identified. Utilizing the knowledge and understanding about Police and Fire Station site design, a minimum lot size can be calculated. See Section 6 of this report for lot size requirements. Budgeting Methodology When the program statements were completed, budgets were developed for the project. The initial budgets developed provide for a good quality municipal structure subject to 365/24/7 use with an appearance that will be complementary to its surroundings. Budgets for this project are located in Section 7. View Looking North Fire Station 14 Apparatus Bays FGM has an extensive database of cost information and used cost per square foot estimates as the budgeting methodology for the conceptual budgets. Because no actual design work has been performed, a budget range is provided for construction costs as well as a Total Project Budget. Space Needs Analysis Summary The analysis identified the following space needs requirements in terms of square footage (sq.ft.) of space required for the Police and Fire Department to function effectively. Police Department Police Station 81,123 sq.ft. A total of 65 parking spaces are required for staff parking. Parking West Elevation Fire Station 14 for 55 Police Department vehicles are located within the building. Apparatus Bays 45 parking spaces are required for visitor parking which includes parking for community and training functions. Fire Department Headquarters Fire Station 13 28,646 sq.ft. November 10, 2017 Page 4 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS A total of 42 parking spaces are required for Fire vehicles and staff parking. 40 parking spaces are required for visitor parking which includes parking for outside agencies during training functions. Combined Building Combined Police and Fire Station 108,030 sq.ft. If the Police and Fire Station are combined, a total of 142 parking spaces are required for Police/Fire Department vehicles and staff parking. Visitor parking can be shared and 45 parking spaces would meet the needs for community and training functions. When comparing the space needs requirements identified in this report he need for additional space which are discussed in Section 5 of this report. Lot Size Requirements The following is a summation of the minimum lot size requirements assuming a maximum lot coverage area of not more than 75% and 90% of the lot. These requirements will meet requirements for Municipal Buildings in Residential Zoning Districts R-X, R-1, R-A, R-2, R-3; Business Zoning Districts B-3 and B-4; Industrial District I-1. In Zoning Districts B-5 and B-5C, there is no minimum requirement, but understanding that the Village would like to have some landscaped areas, 90% lot coverage was selected for this study. Police Department Police Station Maximum 75% Lot Coverage 3.45 acres Police Station Maximum 90% Lot Coverage 2.96 acres For a standalone police station, a three level police station (two stories above grade with a basement) is assumed. Fire Department H.Q. Fire Station 13 Maximum 75% Lot Coverage 2.23 acres H.Q. Fire Station 13 Maximum 90% Lot Coverage 1.92 acres For H.Q. Fire Station 13, a two level fire station is assumed. The Apparatus Bays would be a single level portion of the building. Combined Police Department and Headquarters Fire Station 13 Combined Building Maximum 75% Lot Coverage 4.50 acres Combined Building Maximum 90% Lot Coverage 3.87 acres November 10, 2017 Page 5 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS For the combined building, a three level building (two stories above grade with a basement) is assumed. The Fire Department Apparatus Bays would be a single level portion of the building. For additional information, see Section 6 of this report. Budget Summary Budgets are provided for a standalone Police Station, a standalone Headquarters Fire Station 13 and a Combined Police Department and Headquarters Fire Station 13. Costs are based on a spring/summer 2019 construction start. Budgets will need to be escalated for inflation as required annually after that time frame. Cost ranges have been provided as no actual design work has been performed. New Standalone Police Station Low High Construction Budget $31,345,038 $33,456,859 Owner Purchased Items (FF&E, etc.) $996,000 $1,158,000 Fees and Soft Costs $2,280,427 $2,462,696 Owner Contingency $324,643 $362,070 Total Project Budget $35,116,109 $37,439,624 New Standalone H.Q. Fire Station 13 Low High Construction Costs $10,464,005 $11,139,102 Owner Purchased Items (FF&E, etc.) $314,000 $386,000 Fees and Soft Costs $954,800 $1,058,433 Owner Contingency $126,880 $144,443 Total Project Budget $11,859,685 $12,727,978 Combined Police Department And H.Q. Fire Station 13 Low High Construction Costs $40,734,841 $43,280,769 Owner Purchased Items (FF&E, etc.) $1,263,000 $1,485,000 Fees and Soft Costs $2,700,059 $2,917,500 Owner Contingency $396,306 $440,250 Total Project Budget $45,094,206 $48,123,519 November 10, 2017 Page 6 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS For additional information, see Section 7 of this report. Utilizing the Existing Police and Fire Station as a Police Station Can the existing Police and Fire Station be utilized for the Police relocate H.Q. Fire Station 13. The current police station occupies approximately 55% of the existing building so it would be a significant improvement to the working conditions of the Department if the entire building was a dedicated police station. The question that arises is whether or not this solution will meet the long term needs to the Police Department which we will define for a municipality to be 40-50 years. The long term space needs identified for the Police Department is 81,123 square feet. The total gross area of the existing building is 67,658 square feet. Therefore, the long term needs will need to be reduced by 13,465 square feet. FGM worked with the Police Department to identify potential reductions to the programmatic needs with the goal of reducing the program approximately 17% so it can fit within the existing building. Many of the space reductions affect the long term needs of the Department and may require future considerations as needs arise. The Village will need to consider this as they decide the best course of action to meet the needs of the Police Department. Budget Summary A budget for renovating the existing building to a stand alone police station was also developed. The budget includes replacement of the existing parking deck as it is in disrepair and has been problematic since the facility was open. The budget also includes renovation of the existing fire apparatus bays to convert them into useable space for offices, a training room or other police functions. A summary of the costs is as follows. Renovate Existing for Police Station Low High Construction Budget $17,368,542 $19,697,349 Owner Purchased Items (FF&E, etc.) $856,000 $1,048,000 Fees and Soft Costs $1,681,326 $1,937,275 Owner Contingency $253,733 $298,527 Total Project Budget $20,949,080 $23,876,485 For additional information, see the reduced building budget at the end of this section. November 10, 2017 Page 7 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS This study is to be utilized as a starting point and is intended to provide the Village with the necessary information to make an informed decision on which direction they should take to address the space needs issues of the Police and Fire Department. Once the space needs are approved and the Village is ready to move forward, FGM Architects is prepared to assist the Village of Mount Prospect with the next steps. November 10, 2017 Page 8 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Overview of Study Process SECTION 2 For over 25 years, FGM Architects has provided consulting and PROJECT UNDERSTANDING architectural design services to municipalities, police departments AND METHODOLOGY and fire stations and has worked on more than 100 police and over 250 fire service projects. FGM brings a vast amount of knowledge and understanding to this project through previous experience but understands that each Village has its own unique challenges and goals. Therefore, there is no cookie-cutter project or client and we must work with Police and Fire Department staff members to understand the operational issues of each. The goal of this study is to provide the Village with information on how to best solve its facility needs for the next 40-50 years. The existing Police and Fire Station is located at 112 E. Northwest Highway and was originally constructed in 1993. Since the building was constructed, minor improvements have been made to the building in an attempt to accommodate operational changes of the Police and Fire Department. At this time, the existing building is less than ideal in terms of interior space, work flow and parking. Analysis of Space Needs FGM obtained information for this study through information provided and through a series of interviews and discussions with staff that took place over several days. The information provided included: General Information Existing Building Drawings Police Department Information Staffing Data/Schedules Staff Organization and Functional Organization Charts General Orders Vehicle Information Fire Department Information Staff Organization and Functional Organization Charts Vehicle Information The interviews consisted of meetings with individuals and groups representing the Police and the Fire Department individually or in groups and included the following: Police Department Police Command Staff (Police Chief, Deputy Chiefs and Commanders) Police Administrative Staff Crime Prevention November 10, 2017 Page 9 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Crime Free Housing Investigations Commander, Sergeant and Investigators Records Supervisor and Clerks Patrol Commanders, Sergeants and Officers (all shifts) Community Service Officers Special Operations Unit School Resource Officer Property Officer/Evidence Technician Coordinator Technical Services Unit Range Master Fire Department Fire Command Staff (Fire Chief, Deputy Chiefs, Battalion Chiefs and Lieutenants) Fire Marshall EMS Coordinator Project Analyst FGM toured the existing building and observed how staff members operate within it to gain further insight into operational issues and space need requirements. For Police Department operations, FGM also toured the Firing Range in the basement of Fire Station 12 located at 1601 W. Golf Road. All information was gathered and then analyzed to determine building and site requirements. The analysis was then summarized into a projection of space requirements called Program Statements. The Program Statements located in Section 4 of this report, are the final product of the space needs analysis portion of the study. While this study was performed in a very collaborative manner with staff members, FGM consistently reviewed space requests and operating assumptions to ensure that the recommended space size allotments reflect accurate needs. Lot Size Requirements The completed Program Statements identify the building size and site requirements. From this information, it is possible to identify the land requirements or lot size for each option identified. Utilizing the knowledge and understanding about Police and Fire Station site design, a minimum lot size can be calculated. See Section 6 of this report for lot size requirements. Budgeting Methodology When the program statements were completed, budgets were developed for the project. The initial budgets developed provide November 10, 2017 Page 10 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS for a good quality municipal structure subject to 365/24/7 use with an appearance that will be complementary to its surroundings. Budgets for this project are located in Section 7. FGM has an extensive database of cost information and used cost per square foot estimates as the budgeting methodology for the conceptual budgets. To verify budgets, FGM also consulted with local area builders. Because no actual design work has been performed, a budget range is provided for construction costs as well as a Total Project Budget. November 10, 2017 Page 11 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Goals SECTION 3 For every project, it is important to establish clear goals which will PROJECT GOALS AND be utilized to guide the direction of the solutions and decisions QUESTIONS TO BE throughout the project. The following goals were identified by ANSWERED Police and Fire Department staff and includes goals for the Study as well as goals for the future implementation of the building project. The primary goal of this study is to identify the space needs requirements for the Police and Fire Department which will meet the VillageOther goals established by the Village include: 1. The study will be utilized as a tool to inform staff, elected officials and residents about the deficiencies and needs of the Police and Fire Departments regarding the Police Station and Fire Station 13. 2. This study will provide the Police and Fire Department with an opportunity to review their operations and identify items that will enhance their effectiveness. 3. long term planning work. 4. For specific building goals, the Village would like to demonstrate its commitment to sustainable buildings and depending on the location of the buildings, have the ability to host community events. Questions to be Answered To allow for an informed decision making process, it is important to identify the questions the Village requires answers to as part of this study. The following questions were identified from meetings with the Village. A brief answer to each question has been provided in red italic type. 1. What is the best path for improving the working conditions for each Department? For the Police Department, the long-term needs are much greater than their current space or even the space available if they were to take over the entire existing building. Therefore, the best path for the Police Department would be to provide a new facility meeting the identified space needs. The Fire Department requires additional space which can be accommodated for if the Police Department were to vacate the existing building. 2. Can the existing building be renovated in such a way as to provide a functional police or fire station? November 10, 2017 Page 12 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS The existing to meet all of the long term needs of the Police Department. The building has enough space to provide a highly functional fire station, however, there would be a significant amount of excess space left over in the existing building. The option to use the existing facility for the Police Department is discussed in Section 8 of this report. 3. How much space does the Police and Fire Department require to operate effectively? See Section 5 of this report. 4. Does having the Police and Fire Department together in one facility increase operational effectiveness? During the course of the study, we observed how the Police and Fire Department complement each other providing public safety services to the Village. However, with operational objectives so different, it was difficult to identify synergies where having the Police and Fire Department together would have any significant impact on operational effectiveness. 5. How will future changes in the Village affect the Police and Fire Department? From a macro level viewpoint, the most significant changes that will affect Police and Fire Department Operations include potential land annexations and development of Senior Assisted Living Facilities. Land annexations that includes large residential populations, or a significant amount of retail or industrial uses can impact both Police and Fire Department operations. For the Police Department, additional patrol and investigations staff may be required. For the Fire Department, a Fire Station may need to be relocated to provide proper response times to affected areas. Development of Senior Assisted Living Facilities can significantly affect Fire Department operations. Call volume from such a facility may warrant relocation of a Fire Station. 6. Is there any potential for consolidation of services? How will this influence potential solutions? There is a chance that the Mount Prospect Police and Fire Departments will provide primary police and fire services to adjacent communities and unincorporated areas. 7. How much will potential solutions cost? November 10, 2017 Page 13 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS See Section 7 and 8 of this report. 8. How can the building be designed to be adaptable to changes in technology? While this analysis did not include any actual design work, space needs include allowances for future new technologies. During the implementation phase, as part of design, there are many items that can be incorporated to ensure buildings are flexible space for technology, easily accessible wiring raceways and adequate power services are some of the items that can be incorporated in a building to provide adaptability. November 10, 2017 Page 14 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS The following diagrams illustrate the building as it currently is being SECTION 4 utilized and will provide a frame of reference for the space needs EXISTING CONDITIONS requirements identified in Section 5 of this report. The breakdown of the approximate existing building areas attributable to the Police and Fire Departments are as follows: Area Square Feet Police Department 34,416 Fire Department 22,360 Shared Spaces 5,527 Walls and Mechanical Chases 5,355 Total Gross Building Area 67,658 The site area for the existing building is approximately 1.50 acres EXISTING SITE Aerial Photograph of the Existing Police and Fire Station November 10, 2017 Page 15 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS PARKING EXISTING BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN Fire Dept. Parking 5,684 SF Police Dept. Parking 15,283 SF 20,967 SF POLICE DEPARTMENT Circulation 671 SF Evidence Collection 902 SF Evidence Property 695 SF Firearms Range/Training 72 SF Information Technology 92 SF Lockers/Fitness 1,808 SF Patrol 635 SF Staff Support Spaces 103 SF Warm Storage 877 SF 5,855 SF SHARED SPACES Building Circulation 462 SF Mechanical/Electrical 1,077 SF 1,539 SF WALL AND CHASE SPACE 1,487 SF BASEMENT TOTAL GROSS AREA 29,848 SF November 10, 2017 Page 16 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN FIRE DEPARTMENT Apparatus & Support 8,351 SF 8,351 SF POLICE DEPARTMENT Booking 2,692 SF Circulation 720 SF Information Technology 146 SF Operations Support/Front Desk 320 SF Patrol 1,458 SF Records 1,171 SF Staff Support Spaces 83 SF 6,591 SF SHARED SPACES Building Circulation 618 SF Mechanical/Electrical 70 SF Shared Public Spaces 2,301 SF 2,988 SF WALL AND CHASE SPACE 2,027 SF FIRST FLOOR TOTAL GROSS AREA 19,957 SF November 10, 2017 Page 17 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRE DEPARTMENT Apparatus & Support 99 SF Circulation 770 SF Fire Administration 3,067 SF Fire Inspection 1,514 SF Residential 2,874 SF 8,325 SF POLICE DEPARTMENT Circulation 75 SF Community Services 288 SF Evidence Collection 101 SF Information Technology 296 SF Investigations 2,878 SF Police Administration 3,048 SF 6,687 SF SHARED SPACES Building Circulation 451 SF Mechanical/Electrical 48 SF Shared Public Spaces 501 SF 1,000 SF WALL AND CHASE SPACE 2,295 SF SECOND FLOOR TOTAL GROS AREA 18,307 SF November 10, 2017 Page 18 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Facility Space Analysis SECTION 5 The Mount Prospect Police Department currently consists of 83 ANALYSIS OF SPACE NEEDS Sworn Police Officers on 3 shifts and 22 civilian employees. In the past, the Department had as many as 94 Sworn Police Officers. The potential for growth in the Department includes the addition of a Crime Analyst, a Social Worker, 9-10 Patrol Officers and possibly an Investigator. If annexations occur, the Department will need to perform a staffing study to determine if additional Sworn personnel are necessary. The Mount Prospect Fire Department currently has 18 firefighters assigned to Station #13. In addition to the firefighters there are also 6 Fire Administration personnel and 6 staff within the Fire Inspection Department who work out of Station #13. As the Village is largely Entrance Lobby built-out, growth of the Department is expected to be minimal. The Villages population is expected to grow at a modest pace. The Village is fully developed, however there are areas they may be re-developed into higher density housing, including Senior Assisted Living facilities. There are also areas that may be annexed into the Village in the future. Initial reviews of areas that may potentially be annexed include residential and light industrial areas which would require additional policing and fire coverage. The 2010 Census identified the population at 54,167 and in 2013 the population was estimated at 54,771. According to the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) they estimate the population will be 63,071 in 2040. Summation of Space Analysis Police Reception Desk The Space Needs Analysis Identifies the amount of space necessary the following scenarios: Stand Alone Police Station: 81,123 sq.ft. Stand Alone Headquarters Fire Station 13: 28,646 sq.ft. Combined Police and Fire Station: 108,030 sq.ft. The existing 67,658 sq.ft. combined Police and Fire Station is located at 112 E. Northwest Highway in Mount Prospect. Construction of the three-story brick building located in the downtown district was completed in 1993. When the building was designed, accommodations for the changing needs of the Village were not planned for and the building no longer meets the needs of the Police and Fire Departments. Since the building was Second Floor Lobby constructed, many operational changes have taken place and the building is now less than ideal in terms of work space and work flow. This will be discussed further in the following sections. November 10, 2017 Page 19 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS The Police Station occupies 34,416 sq.ft. of the existing 67,658 sq.ft. SECTION 5 combined Police and Fire Station located at 112 E. Northwest ANALYSIS OF SPACE NEEDS - Highway. The lower level is dedicated to fleet parking, evidence POLICE DEPARTMENT storage and processing, and shared staff areas. The first level includes the public lobby, a shared training room, records, patrol, and prisoner holding. The second level includes investigations and administration. The building as originally designed does not support how the Police Department would like to operate now. Currently, the Department has had to conform their procedures to the physical constraints of the building. Most notably is how the Administration, Records and Investigation Divisions are physically separated from the rest of the Department which has unintentionally fostered a segregated environment reducing communication and collaboration among the staff. The space needs analysis identifies 81,123 sq. ft. of space is required for the Police Department in a stand along police station. Site parking requirements include 65 spaces are required for staff parking and 55 parking spaces are required for public parking. Police vehicles and trailers are to be located in a vehicle garage within the building. Police Armory See the Police Department Space Needs Program spreadsheet attached to this section for detailed information. Why More Space is Required When comparing the new space needs requirements to the additional space must be addressed and understood. Many factors contribute to the need for additional space and the major points are as follows: Changes in Operations - The building was originally designed in 1992 and spaces are now inadequate due to changes in operations. Information Technology - Dedicated space for Information Technology (IT) needs to be provided. Accessibility Current building and accessibility codes require more space than what was needed at the time the building was designed. Each of these topics will be explored briefly: Police Mass Arrest Cell November 10, 2017 Page 20 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Changes in Operations: Many of the current spaces in the police station are now inadequate. Changes in policing, including rules, regulations and procedural issues can influence space requirements. Some examples include: Booking & Holding Currently the booking room is set up with the prisoners detained in the middle and the officer standing with his back Booking Room processing paperwork. This layout creates a clear danger to the officer who should have the prisoner within his line of sight at all times. Additionally, the breathalyzer room is located at the far end of the booking area, forcing officers to navigate a drunk prisoner through the entire room introducing both of them to numerous tripping and falling hazards along the way. Conference Rooms Throughout the building there is a severe shortage of conference and meeting spaces. Within the patrol department the only meeting space is also utilized as a staff break area, soft interview room and storage. Several conference rooms of different sizes should be provided throughout the building in strategic locations that can be used for a variety of functions such as, major case Breathalyzer Room investigations, administrative functions, special projects and routine meetings. Investigations Over the last ten years one of the biggest changes within the Police Department is how they investigate crimes. Many crimes now are financial, online scams and credit card fraud. There is less legwork in the field and more time spent at the station doing computer investigations. Space needs to be allocated for new methodologies and equipment. Evidence Processing Investigations Office As the need for scientific evidence is increasing, processing of evidence has become more sophisticated. The Police Department is seeking to increase its in-house capabilities for more sophisticated evidence analysis work which requires dedicated and specifically designed task oriented work areas. Evidence Storage Many of the laws regarding evidence processing and retention have changed since the design of the building in 1992. Currently the evidence storage room is located in the Evidence Processing basement with a wet sprinkler system, this creates a potential November 10, 2017 Page 21 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS situation where flooding and damage to evidence could occur. The workspace for evidence processing is too small and lacks the proper lighting and equipment necessary due to its restricted size. Interdepartmental Interaction Increasing communication throughout the department requires allocating enough space within the station to foster a culture where daily interaction occurs naturally. In the current Evidence Storage building, divisions were planned in a segregated manner and it is not uncommon for staff members from different divisions not to see one another for extended periods of time. - traditional areas such as hallways and break areas is becoming common in police station design and is an effective method of increasing communication throughout the department. Locker Rooms Since 1993 many changes have taken place that affect the storage requirements for police officers. Lockers are now used to store a multitude of items, including training manuals, bulletproof vests, specialized protective equipment, weapons, flashlights, radios and uniforms. This has necessitated a need for larger lockers which increases the overall size of the locker room. Sally Port A police stations sally port is utilized for the safe transfer of prisoners. The current sally port is too small to properly fit two squad cars at the same time. Lack of proper storage spaces within the building has forced the sally port to do double duty as storage for maintenance equipment creating a hazardous environment for both officers and prisoners. Sally Port Soft Interview Room In a modern police station, a soft interview room is often used to interview victims, and provides an alternative to a suspects. This room is also used for counseling and can provides a waiting place for families. Training Requirements: Current best practices have police officers training more often utilizing many different techniques. A regular routine consisting of a mixture of classroom instruction, simulated scenario based training, defensive tactics and live fire weapons training are considered the best practice for training Interview Room today. November 10, 2017 Page 22 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Furthermore, the Illinois Police and Community Relations Act, Public Act 099-0352, has recently been amended to require specific training on an annual, bi-annual and tri-annual basis including annual use of force and scenario based training. Training Room The existing training room within the Police and Fire Station is shared by both departments, it is too small for their needs and often overbooked. In order to meet the training requirements Police Reception Desk of the department a dedicated classroom with seating for 40, with support spaces for audio/visual equipment, storage, and restrooms is needed. This will allow the department to conduct training seminars as well as invite outside agencies to attend. Tactical Training There is no space in the current building allocated to tactical training. Many modern police agencies utilize a combination of defense tactics training with live fire training to simulate high stress situations. Ideally a large defensive tactics training room should be adjacent to the firing range so officers can easily transition from one to the other. Firing Range Located at Fire Station 12 Firing Range The existing firing range is located remotely in the basement of Fire Station #12. Being located off site and within another departments building greatly limits the times when the range can be utilized due to noise issues. This presents scheduling difficulties for live fire training and weapons qualifying. To provide state of the art training, the department should have a wider firing range allowing for scenario based training with in the range. In modern police training, it has been based training is the most effective methodology for training Range Preparation and officers. Cleaning Area at Fire Station 12 Workspace Size Throughout the department there are many areas where the current workspaces and offices are undersized. The records department handles a large volume of paperwork and currently do not have enough workspace or layout space to patrol are extremely small, located too close together and lack adequate storage space. The report writing stations do not have sufficient counter space to layout paperwork and often are utilized by officers before shift to check email Special Operations Unit four making this a very crowded, busy area. people work in this office November 10, 2017 Page 23 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Information Technology The existing building was designed at a time when the potential of computer usage was not fully realized. Similar to many other functional areas in the building, space was adapted to provide for Information Technology (IT) needs. Server Rooms The existing server rooms were originally designed as lunch and phone equipment rooms and then were used for storage and Administrative Staff Locker Rooms prior to conversion into technology/server rooms. Space for Patrol additional equipment is limited and serviceability is less than idea. I.T. System Technicians The Police Department has also converted other spaces within the building for I.T. Systems Technicians and computer equipment storage. The spaces were located wherever space could be found. Cybercrime The Use of Computers in policing has grown significantly in the past ten years. As computer/cybercrime has Police A increased, policing has adapted with increased use of computers for data mining, crime analysis, and on-line crime issues. What is often overlooked when using computers are the security requirements. When using a computer with specialty software for fighting crime, evidentiary rules apply to the computer, therefore, secure work areas are required. Accessibility Requirements. The existing building was designed and constructed at a time when accessibility requirements were not a significant concern. Since the building was built, laws governing the accessibility requirements have been enacted including the Illinois Accessibility Code which has been in effect since 1997 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) adopted in 1990 (with subsequent revisions) which requires more space for accessible routes (entries, corridors and stairways), workspaces, and support spaces (toilet and locker rooms) Publicly owned buildings are held to a higher standard for accessibility than privately owned buildings. While there are many rules that govern when a space needs to be brought into compliance with accessibility standards, generally, if a space is renovated it will be required to be brought into compliance with I.T. and Phone Equipment Room the Illinois Accessibility Code and the ADA. November 10, 2017 Page 24 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS The existing Mt. Prospect Fire Station #13 was constructed in 1992 SECTION 5 and is a three-story brick building located in the downtown district ANALYSIS OF SPACE NEEDS - of Mount Prospect. The lower level is dedicated to administrative FIRE DEPARTMENT parking. The first level includes the public lobby, apparatus bay, a shared training room and support spaces. The second level includes the fire administration offices, fire inspector offices and the residential spaces. The building was not designed with the proper access and quick response that is necessary for a fire department. The residential spaces are isolated on the second floor while the apparatus bay is on the first level. Ideally all training should be located at station #13 due to its central location. However, with the current site and storage Fire Reception Desk constraints this is not possible. There is inadequate space for classroom and tactical training forcing personnel to leave the station creating a domino effect of shuffling firefighters and equipment around to maintain proper coverage at all the stations. Being located near the downtown district is important, the downtown area is developing quickly, new high rises are being constructed and the current population is aging. With all these factors comes an increase in call volume for the fire department. A balance needs to be met between providing adequate exterior training space with parking while still maintaining quick access to the downtown district. Why More Space is Required Apparatus Bay When comparing the new space needs requirements to the must be addressed and understood. Many factors contribute to the need for additional space and the major points are as follows: Circulation and Access - The current building is very segmented and is not conducive to creating a community atmosphere and reducing response times to the fire apparatus. Training Requirements - Current training needs require large spaces for classroom and tactical training that is necessary to meet the demands of modern fire departments. Accessibility Current building and accessibility codes require West Apron more space than what was needed at the time the building was designed. Each of these topics will be explored briefly: November 10, 2017 Page 25 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Circulation and Access Communal Spaces The existing kitchen and dayroom have been recently renovated to create a more open atmosphere, however they are still undersized and do not accommodate the current needs. Most of the building is still very segmented and there is a lack of larger meeting/work spaces where firefighters can sit together and study or fill out reports. Inadequate Bunks The existing bunk room partitions do no extend to the ceiling and provide no acoustical separation between the bunks. Modern bunk design currently includes a desk area for studying, 3 lockers within the bunk along with space to store bedding Bunk Area when not on duty. Some fire fighters choose to study in their bunk areas and having adequate space and partitions that extend to the ceiling is essential. should have bunks separate from the main bunk area closer to the office area. ally need to respond to calls at night and need to be closer to the operations rather than the other fire fighters. Slower Response Time The existing building layout has the apparatus bay on the first floor and residential spaces located on the second floor. This layout does not work well when needing to respond to calls during the night. An ideal layout would be to have the bunks directly adjacent to the bays in order to reduce response time and eliminate hazards of travelling down stairs in a rush. Bunk Difficult to Access Bays With the building positioned at an angle to the street, sight lines are poor and access to and from the bays is difficult with the fire trucks. Currently the ladder truck has to drive through the nearby residential neighborhood in order to enter the bay from the east. The other vehicles can back into the bays however this requires some coordination with the firefighters and stopping traffic on Route 14. Stairway from bunks to apparatus bay November 10, 2017 Page 26 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Office Space The existing radio room is located next to the dayroom and a key space for personnel. There are three computer workstations currently, but often 5 or more people will be in the room at the same time. A larger room with more computer stations is started until the other one leaves. Three separate desks should be provided to accommodate each BC. The Lieutenant office is located off the apparatus bay and often becomes the gathering area for all fire fighters. Due to its location next to the bays, it is often used for small training sessions and meetings o work at their Radio Room separate meeting space nearby for training and small meetings. Library The existing library is an adequate size, however it often has to double as a back-up training room when the main training room is booked by other agencies. It is not uncommon to have 30 plus people in the room at one time. Because of frequent overbookings the library is often unavailable to personnel who need a place to study and train. Storage Needs Library Due to the current storage limitations of the existing station most of the extra tools and equipment need to be stored at Station #14. Ideally this extra equipment should be stored at Station #13 since it is the most centrally located and wh are stationed who manage the equipment. Additionally, there is a significant lack of storage space for props and equipment that make it difficult to perform most tactical training exercises. The existing hose tower is being used for equipment storage which impedes access to training functions and the drying of the hoses. Hose Tower November 10, 2017 Page 27 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Training Requirements Classroom Training Currently there is only one large training room in the building that is shared between the police and fire department. The room is often overbooked and does not function well for either department. A dedicated training room for 30-40 occupants with natural light, audio visual capabilities, storage, kitchenette and dedicated restrooms would be necessary to accommodate the departments training needs as well as allow them to host training sessions for outside agencies. In order to Training Room accommodate training for outside agencies parking for approximately 40 vehicles would need to be provided on-site. Tactical Training Due to central location it would be ideal to have all the training located here, however due to the downtown location and site constraints, this is not possible. Some training can be done remotely at other stations, but Station #13 needs to have a place to perform day to day, hands on drills that do not require the firefighters to travel. In addition to the lack of training space there is also inadequate space to park the fire trucks and ambulances that accompany the firefighters when they attend training sessions. Currently the trucks are parked up and down the street creating a bottleneck for vehicles Training Room accessing the police department and residential area to the north. November 10, 2017 Page 28 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF SPACE NEEDS PARKING 40 EXTERIOR SPACES/ 63 INTERIOR SPACES Main Parking Lot note how vehicles are parked in drive aisles Parking Analysis As part of the needs analysis, it is necessary to determine the parking requirements for the entire building. To perform this analysis, we reviewed projected parking requirements for each department and then compared the requirements to the actual parking counts. Summary Findings Parking at the existing building is extremely limited and problematic for both the police and fire departments. Often, the staff have Entrance to Underground to find parking off site either at the Village Hall or in the surrounding Parking Garage neighborhood. There is also no separation between the visitor parking and staff parking areas. In the past there have been instances where police officers have been confronted by released arrestees while leaving the building. This is a major security concern for the officers. A dedicated and secure parking area should be provided. The limited amount of parking available also impacts the training that can occur at this building. Often training sessions and public events need to be held elsewhere in the village due to the lack of available parking. Underground Parking Garage November 10, 2017 Page 29 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS The total number of existing parking spaces for the building is 103 spaces, 40 exterior spaces and 63 interior spaces. A summary of recommended parking spaces is as follows: Police Department Parking Requirements Department Vehicles 55 spaces Staff Parking (at peak demand) 65 spaces Seized Vehicles (can be remotely located) 12 spaces Visitor Parking 5 spaces Community and Training Room Parking 40 spaces Total Police Department Parking Requirements 177 spaces Underground Parking Garage Police Department Parking Requirements note how car is protected from at Police Station (does not include Seized Vehicles) 165 spaces leaking structure Fire Department Parking Requirements Department Vehicles 9 spaces 3 spaces Staff Parking (at peak demand) 16 spaces Administration Staff 14 spaces Community and Training Room Parking 40 spaces Total Fire Department Parking Requirements 82 spaces Combined Facility Parking Requirements If the Police and Fire Department were combined in a shared facility, the Community and Training Room would be shared and parking requirements would be reduced by 40 spaces. Staff parking for shift change can also be reduced by 8 spaces as the Police Department shift change at peak demand times differs from the Fire Departments shift change. Total Combined Facility Parking Requirements 199 spaces Underground Parking Garage note use of gutter system installed to protect vehicles Peak demand for the Police Department is during the afternoon from leaking water stains shift change at 3:00 pm. At this time, administrative and daytime personnel are working and patrol shifts coming on and leaving need to be accounted for. The Fire Department has one shift change per day which takes place at 7:00 am. November 10, 2017 Page 30 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Following this are the Police and Fire Department Space Needs SECTION 5 Programs referenced in Section 5. ANALYSIS OF SPACE NEEDS ATTACHMENTS Space Needs Programs 1. Police Department (standalone) This program identifies the space needs requirements for a standalone police station. The program includes a Community Room, Training Room and a firing range (currently located at Fire Station 12). 2. Fire Department Station 13 (standalone) This program identifies the space needs requirements for a standalone Fire Station 13 which is the Fire Department Headquarters and includes the Fire Department Administration. 3. Combined Police and Fire Station 13 This program assumes that the Police Station and Fire Station 13 are combined into a shared facility similar to the existing building. Combining the stations allows for the Community Room, Fitness Room, and Mechanical Rooms to be shared saving 3,794 sq.ft. of space. Public Parking and Shift Change Parking can also be shared which reduces overall parking requirements by 48 cars. Note that Space Needs Programs attempt to compare the size of existing space to space required. In many cases, it is difficult to existing building, many spaces accommodate more than one function. Therefore, we suggest using the space comparison as a general comparison only. November 10, 2017 Page 31 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Police Department The following program is for a standalone SECTION 5 Police Station. ANALYSIS OF SPACE NEEDS ATTACHMENTS - POLICE DEPARTMENT SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM November 10, 2017 Page 32 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 33 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 34 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 35 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 36 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 37 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 38 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 39 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 40 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 41 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 42 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 43 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Fire Station 13 The following program is for a standalone SECTION 5 Headquarters Fire Station 13. ANALYSIS OF SPACE NEEDS ATTACHMENTS FIRE STATION 13 SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM November 10, 2017 Page 44 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 45 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 46 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 47 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 48 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Combined Police Department and Fire Station 13 The following SECTION 5 program is for a combined Police Station and Fire Station 13. ANALYSIS OF SPACE NEEDS ATTACHMENTS - COMBINED POLICE DEPARTMENT AND FIRE STATION 13 SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM November 10, 2017 Page 49 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 50 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 51 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 52 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 53 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 54 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 55 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 56 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 57 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 58 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 59 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 60 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 61 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 62 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 63 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 64 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Lot Size SECTION 6 After establishing of the size of the building and potential parking LOT REQUIREMENTS - SIZE and site requirements for each potential option, it is possible to estimate the lot size required for the Police Station, Fire Station 13 and a Combined Police and Fire Station 13. The following is a summation of the minimum lot size requirements assuming a maximum lot coverage area of not more than 75% and 90% of the lot. This requirement will meet the Zoning District requirements for Municipal Buildings in Residential Zoning Districts R-X, R-1, R-A, R-2, R-3; Business Zoning Districts B-3 and B-4; Industrial District I-1 per the Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. In Zoning Districts B-5 and B-5C, there is no minimum requirement, but understanding that the Village would like to have some landscaped areas, 90% lot coverage was selected for this study. Police Department Police Station Maximum 75% Lot Coverage 3.45 acres Police Station Maximum 90% Lot Coverage 2.96 acres For a standalone police station, a three level police station (two stories above grade with a basement) is assumed. Fire Department Fire Station 13 Maximum 75% Lot Coverage 2.23 acres Fire Station 13 Maximum 90% Lot Coverage 1.92 acres For Fire Station 13, a two-level fire station is assumed. The Apparatus Bays would be a single level portion of the building. Combined Police Department and Fire Station 13 Combined Building Maximum 75% Lot Coverage 4.50 acres Combined Building Maximum 90% Lot Coverage 3.87 acres For the combined building, a three-level building (two stories above grade with a basement) is assumed. The Fire Department Apparatus Bays would be a single level portion of the building. Recommended minimum lot sizes assume that the lot configuration is rectangular in nature and not an unusual or irregular configuration. For more detailed information, see the Lot Size Requirement Calculations attached to this section. November 10, 2017 Page 65 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Site Selection Criteria SECTION 6 Considerations for site selection for a Police and Fire Station should LOT REQUIREMENTS SITE take into account the following items: SELECTION CRITERIA Size of parcel The size of the parcel must be adequate to accommodate the assumed building footprint, visitor, staff, and Police and Fire Department vehicle parking requirements, setback requirements, maximum lot coverage requirements, and storm water detention requirements. The site must be adequate in size to allow for efficient flow and to accommodate proper separation of public and secure areas. Public, or visitor parking needs to be highly visible, convenient to the entrance, and easy to maneuver in and out of. Staff parking should be located within a secured area since some staff work late at night or early in the morning. Police vehicles should be located in a secured area surrounded by a perimeter fence to protect vehicles from vandalism, or in a covered parking area or enclosed garage to keep vehicles ready for immediate use and to protect electronic equipment during times of inclement weather. Delivery and service areas should be located away from the public, but not within the secured area. Site access Proximity to at least one major thoroughfare is desirable for ease of public access. The configuration of the site should allow for multiple egress/ingress points for vehicles in the event that one is blocked. Egress for vehicles onto two different streets is ideal. Location For the Police Station, a site centrally located in the Village, or a location with good access is preferred. For Fire Station 13, the site should be located relative to other Fire Stations to maximize potential coverage and minimize response time throughout the Village. Good visibility for public wayfinding should also be considered. Access to the site via sidewalks and public transportation is also a benefit to the community. November 10, 2017 Page 66 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Following this are the Police Department and Fire Station 13 Lot SECTION 6 Size Calculations referenced in Section 6. LOT REQUIREMENTS LOT SIZE CALCULATIONS Lot Size Calculation Worksheets 1. Police Department Police Station Maximum 75% Lot Coverage Police Station Maximum 90% Lot Coverage 2. Fire Department Fire Station 13 Maximum 75% Lot Coverage Fire Station 13 Maximum 90% Lot Coverage 3. Combined Police Department and Fire Station 13 Combined Building Maximum 75% Lot Coverage Combined Building Maximum 90% Lot Coverage November 10, 2017 Page 67 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 68 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 69 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 70 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 71 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 72 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 73 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Project Budgets SECTION 7 As part of this study, FGM has provided conceptual budgets to PROJECT BUDGETS implement the project. For the attached summaries, the Total Project Budget includes the cost of construction, fees and soft costs for each of the schemes. Costs are based on a quality municipal structure that will be serviceable for 40-50 years assuming an appearance and use of materials that are complimentary to other municipal facilities in Mount Prospect. Costs are based on a spring/summer 2019 construction start. Budgets will need to be escalated for inflation as required annually after that time frame. Cost ranges have been provided as design work is no actual design work has been performed. For more details, see the Budgets attached to this section. Budget Summary Budgets are provided for a standalone Police Station, a standalone Headquarters Fire Station 13 and a Combined Police Department and Headquarters Fire Station 13. The following is a summation of the budgets: New Standalone Police Station Low High Construction Budget $31,345,038 $33,456,859 Owner Purchased Items (FF&E, etc.) $996,000 $1,158,000 Fees and Soft Costs $2,280,427 $2,462,696 Owner Contingency $324,643 $362,070 Total Project Budget $35,116,109 $37,439,624 New Standalone H.Q. Fire Station 13 Low High Construction Costs $10,464,005 $11,139,102 Owner Purchased Items (FF&E, etc.) $314,000 $386,000 Fees and Soft Costs $954,800 $1,058,433 Owner Contingency $126,880 $144,443 Total Project Budget $11,859,685 $12,727,978 November 10, 2017 Page 74 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Combined Police Department And H.Q. Fire Station 13 Low High Construction Costs $40,734,841 $43,280,769 Owner Purchased Items (FF&E, etc.) $1,263,000 $1,485,000 Fees and Soft Costs $2,700,059 $2,917,500 Owner Contingency $396,306 $440,250 Total Project Budget $45,094,206 $48,123,519 November 10, 2017 Page 75 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS Following this page are the conceptual project budgets for a SECTION 7 standalone Police Station, a standalone Headquarters Fire Station PROJECT BUDGET 13 and a Combined Police Department and Headquarters Fire ATTACHMENTS Station 13. Police Station Conceptual Budget for New 81,123 sq.ft. Police Station Pages 1-2 Headquarters Fire Station 13 Conceptual Budget for New 28,646 sq.ft. Fire Station Pages 1-2 Combined Police Department and Headquarters Fire Station 13 Conceptual Budget for New 108,030 sq.ft. Combined Building Pages 1-2 November 10, 2017 Page 76 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 77 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 78 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 79 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 80 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 81 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 82 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS SECTION 8 USE EXISTING BUILDING question assumes that the Fire Department will relocate H.Q. Fire FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT Station 13. The current police station occupies approximately 55% of the existing building so it would be a significant improvement to the working conditions of the Department if the entire building was a dedicated police station. The question that arises is whether or not this solution will meet the long term needs to the Police Department which we will define for a municipality to be 40-50 years. The long term space needs identified for the Police Department is 81,123 square feet. The total gross area of the existing building is 67,658 square feet. Therefore, the long term needs will need to be reduced by 13,465 square feet. FGM worked with the Police Department to identify potential reductions to the programmatic needs with the goal of reducing the program approximately 17% so it can fit within the existing building. The reductions are highlighted in the attached reduced program located in this section. To achieve the necessary reductions, spaces were reduced throughout the program. The following highlights some of the more significant reductions: Eliminated the Community Room The number of Interview Rooms were reduced. Spaces for future functions such as a Crime Analyst were eliminated Evidence Storage Areas were reduced in size Evidence Processing areas were reduced in size The Firearms Range was eliminated and is assumed to remain as is at Fire Station 12 The Holding Facility will remain as is understanding that it does not meet modern standards Many of the space reductions affect the long term needs of the Department and may require future considerations as needs arise. The Village will need to consider this as they decide the best course of action to meet the needs of the Police Department. Budget Summary A budget for renovating the existing building to a stand alone police station was also developed. The budget includes replacement of the existing parking deck as it is in disrepair and has been problematic since the facility was open. The budget November 10, 2017 Page 83 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS also includes renovation of the existing fire apparatus bays to convert them into useable space for offices, a training room or other police functions. A summary of the costs is as follows. Renovate Existing for Police Station Low High Construction Budget $17,524,201 $19,708,575 Owner Purchased Items (FF&E, etc.) $856,000 $1,048,000 Fees and Soft Costs $1,694,557 $1,938,229 Owner Contingency $255,056 $298,623 Total Project Budget $20,329,814 $22,993,427 For additional information, see the reduced building budget at the end of this section. November 10, 2017 Page 84 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS The following program is for a reduced size Police Station to allow SECTION 8 the identified functions to fit within the existing Police and Fire USE EXISTING BUILDING Station. FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT REDUCED PROGRAM The areas that have been reduced from the recommended programmatic sizes identified in Section 5 are highlighted in yellow. November 10, 2017 Page 85 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 86 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 87 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 88 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 89 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 90 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 91 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 92 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 93 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 94 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 95 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 96 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS SECTION 8 Following this page is the conceptual project budgets to remodel USE EXISTING BUILDING the existing Police and Fire Station for Police use only. FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET ATTACHMENT Conceptual Budget to Remodel Existing Police and Fire Station to Police Station Pages 1-2 November 10, 2017 Page 97 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 98 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS November 10, 2017 Page 99 MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE AND FIRE SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS This study is to be utilized as a starting point and is intended to provide the Village with the necessary information to make an informed decision on which direction they should take to address the space needs issues of the Police and Fire Department. Once the space needs are approved and the Village is ready to move forward, FGM Architects is prepared to assist the Village of Mount Prospect with the next steps. November 10, 2017 Page 100