The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About9.1 Accept Proposal for 2018 Cured-in-Place-Pipe BoardDocs® ProPage 1 of 3 Agenda Item Details MeetingMay 01, 2018 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. AMENDED 4-30-2018 Category9. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Subject9.1 Motion to accept proposal for 2018 Cured-In-Place-Pipe (CIPP) Sewer Pipe Lining Project construction observation in an amount not to exceed $118,501.90. AccessPublic TypeAction Preferred DateMay 01, 2018 Absolute DateMay 01, 2018 Fiscal ImpactYes Dollar Amount118,501.90 BudgetedYes Budget SourceWater and Sewer Enterprise Fund Recommended ActionAccept the proposal for 2018 Cured-In-Place-Pipe (CIPP) Sewer Pipe Lining Project construction observation as submitted by Baxter & Woodman of Crystal Lake, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $118,501.90. Public Content Background In the current budget, staff requested funds for continuing the combined and separate sewer system repairs. The combined sewer repairs were identified during the review of the Combined Sewer System Evaluation Study (CSSES) completed in 2015. The separate sanitary sewer repairs were identified during our in house televising program that is part of the revised inflow and Infiltration Control Program (IICP) of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC). The Village is beginning the third year of this renewal effort based on the 2015 study. Preparation of plans and bid documents were completed by Village staff and a construction contract was awarded during April 3, 2018 Village Board meeting to Hoerr Construction of Goodfield, IL. The Village has been performing cured-in-place pipelining (CIPP) since the late 1970s. To effectively monitor the Hoerr's work quality and assure end-product quality, specific technical skills and experience are required. Specifically, technical monitoring of the pipe cleaning process, liner inversion, curing, material core laboratory analysis, and post-construction video review are some of tasks required to successfully prosecute the project. Staff prepared a detailed request for proposals (RFP) necessary to solicit these services. A copy of this RFP document is attached. Request for Proposals (RFP) Consulting engineers were asked to submit a technical proposal detailing the firm’s background, key personnel, and approach to the project. In addition, each firm was also asked to submit a separate cost proposal indicating work effort anticipated and a not-to-exceed fee. RFPs were distributed to five https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login6/12/2018 BoardDocs® ProPage 2 of 3 (5) engineering firms with expertise in the in construction rehabilitation of sewer main by means of cured-in- place pipe lining. Three (3) technical proposals and three (3) cost proposals were received. Each proposal was evaluated based on the background of the firm, related project experience, proposed services and scope of work, schedule work effort and proposal content. Each firm received a point ranking (total points = 100) for each criteria. The table below summarizes this analysis: Max Baxter & Burns & CategoryGewalt Hamilton PointsWoodmanMcDonnell Background20181616 Experience20181513 Scope25232020 Schedule15101010 Work Effort10886 Content10888 Total100857773 The technical proposals indicated all of the participating firms were qualified to perform the specified work. All of the firms had adequate experience and appropriately trained staff to provide technical monitoring and construction observation for CIPP projects. Accordingly, the evaluation results were closely distributed. The highest rated firm was Baxter & Woodman of Crystal Lake, IL. Baxter & Woodman has performed this type of work for the Village for the past two years. They have performed exceptionally well and understand performance expectations. Notably, Baxter & Woodman's key staff assigned to this project are all certified in National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) Pipeline Assessment Certification Program. This certification is the industry standard for sewer main condition assessment. Furthermore, the project engineer is a licensed professional engineer with over 20 years of experience designing and field supervising the installation of CIPP systems. A copy of Baxter & Woodman's proposal is attached. All other references indicated that Baxter & Woodman performed well. In addition, Baxter & Woodman has successfully completed several engineering projects for the Village over the course of the last 10 years. These projects include sanitary flow monitoring, spot repair projects, sewer pipe inspection and condition assessment, CIPP lining observation, and water main replacement. Each firm was asked to submit a cost proposal as well. The table below summarizes staff’s analysis of costs. FirmHours Total CostCost/Hours Burns & McDonnell518$60,588$116.96 Baxter & Woodman817$107,729$131.85 Gewalt Hamilton1,164$147,776$116.00 The lowest cost proposal was submitted by Burns & McDonnell. However, it is the opinion of staff that Burns & McDonnell has not allocated work effort (518 hours) to successfully prosecute this project. Staff specifically finds the work hours allocated insufficient when the long cure times (up to 8 hours) of larger diameter pipes are considered. Furthermore, the firm did not supply sufficient evidence of comparable work experience. Only one (1) reference pertaining to field supervision of cured-in-place pipelining was provided. Furthermore, Burns & McDonnell did not allocate work effort for other requisite tasks including cost analysis, pre lining video review, materials testing, and weekly project updates. It is the staff opinion that Baxter & Woodman fully understands the proposed project, has prepared a thorough proposal based on extensive experience, and is best qualified to perform the work. Baxter & Woodman has not increased their rates for this type of work since 2016. Furthermore, their rate is competitive ($131.85/hour) and reasonable remuneration for the field time of an experienced, licensed professional engineer. Staff recommends including a 10% contingency in the award for this proposed contract due to the fact that time spent on construction engineering and inspection can vary due to circumstances beyond the engineering consultant’s control. For example, contractor delays, material availability and inclement weather are all parameters that can lengthen anticipated construction time. https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login6/12/2018 BoardDocs® ProPage 3 of 3 Alternatives 1.Accept Baxter & Woodman’s proposal to provide construction observation for the 2018 Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining Project. 2.Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Village Board accepts the proposal for 2018 Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining Project construction observation as submitted by Baxter & Woodman of Crystal Lake, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $118,501.90. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS construction services.pdf (174 KB)Baxter Proposal.pdf (555 KB) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - Mount Prospect 2018 CIPP (002).pdf (2,421 KB) Administrative Content Executive Content Motion & Voting Accept the proposal for 2018 Cured-In-Place-Pipe (CIPP) Sewer Pipe Lining Project construction observation as submitted by Baxter & Woodman of Crystal Lake, Illinois in an amount not to exceed $118,501.90. Motion by Michael Zadel, second by Richard Rogers. Final Resolution: Motion Carries Yea: William Grossi, Eleni Hatzis, Paul Hoefert, Richard Rogers, Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel https://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login6/12/2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Professional Services 2018 CIPP Construction Services VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS Proposals due April 20th 2018 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Professional Services 2018 CIPP Program Construction services th April 12 2018 Summary The Village is requesting a Proposal to observe and inspect sewers to be lined as part of the 2018 CIPP program. The Village will be lining 25,003 linear feet of both combined and sanitary sewer mains. Tover 500 service reinstatements. The list was put together from past CCTV efforts done by both Village staff and a contractor. All pipe segments were graded to NASCCO standards. All pipes being lined are either graded a 5 and 4 (see attachment A) Problem Statement The Village seeks a qualified Consultant to provide specified engineering services necessary to let, and implement a CIPP Lining project utilizing contracted resources. The scope and scale of this proposed project will be limited by available funding. Project Scope The consultant will provide professional engineering services and provide, at a minimum, the following: Construction Management and Inspection Phase 1. Consultant shall conduct a preconstruction conference with representatives of the Owner, Contractor(s), Utilities and other interested parties affected by the proposed construction. 2. Consultant shall provide resident engineers, inspectors, technicians, and surveyors for the project as follows: i. Provide a Resident Engineer/Inspector (RE/I) for daily observation of the work during the construction period to observe and record construction progress under the general guidance of the Engineer. On the basis of on-site observation, the Engineer will keep the Owner informed of the progress of the work, shall endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the work of the Contractors, and may disapprove or reject work as failing to conform to the contract documents. ii. Prior to the start of construction, the Consultant shall make a digital photographic survey of the targeted work zone(s) to document existing conditions of both public and private property? The survey shall be conducted at a scale sufficient to note defects in driveways, sidewalks, structures, and landscaping in or adjacent to probable construction work areas. iii. Prepare written daily inspection reports. Reports are to be delivered to Owner in an electronic format. Digital photographs documenting work tasks in progress as well as any potential problems or unusual conditions shall also be included with each report. iv. Review Post lining footage to ensure all service laterals have been reinstated. v. Assist the Owner in preparation of any necessary change order and/or field directives. vi. Process monthly applications for payment submitted by the Contractor(s), and forward to Owner with recommendations for approval and payment. vii. Assist the Owner with the resolution of inquiries, complaints, or concerns raised by residents or the general public. viii. Review shop drawings and other equipment/material submittals as may be required by the contract documents. ix. Perform a field observation of all completed work before a final application for payment is processed for the Contractor. x. Revise the original plans in accordance with construction observation records of the Resident Engineer, Inspectors, and the Contractor, and supply the Owner with one set of as-built drawings in a suitable electronic format. Technical Proposal The technical proposal shall be organized so that the outline generally follows the format of this request for proposals. The proposal shall cover the approach and the methodology the Consultant intends to use in carrying out the project. The technical proposal should also include statements setting forth the line of business, organizational structure, summary of past experience, and specific descriptions of at least three (3) projects completed in the Chicago metropolitan area that are similar in subject, size, and complexity to the scope of services specified herein. These descriptions must include contact information for reputable Cost Proposal The consultant will quote a not-to-exceed price for each phase of the services described under Scope of Services. Each price quote should include a breakdown by personnel classification and estimated number of hours spent by each. Price proposals should be submitted as a distinct document in a separate sealed envelope marked: Cost Proposal for Engineering Services 2018 CIPP Program Construction services th Proposals due April 20, 2018 Present Work Load A complete tabulation of the current project workload is to be included. Each project shall be identified by name, type, size, duration, and personnel assigned. Personnel Professional resumes, including education, work experience, professional credentials, and employment status (e.g. full-time, part-time, years with the firm, job description) for each individual to be assigned to the project described herein should be provided. Disqualification of Proposals More than one proposal for the same work described herein from an individual, firm or partnership, a corporation or an association under the same or different names, will not be considered. Reasonable grounds for believing that any party is interested in more than one proposal for the work contemplated will cause the rejection of all proposals in which said party is interested. If there are reasonable grounds for believing that collusion exists among the parties submitting proposals, the proposals of the participants in such collusion will not be considered. Licenses Each party submitting a proposal shall possess all necessary federal, state, and local licenses as are required by law, and shall furnish satisfactory proof to the Village upon request that the licenses are in effect during the entire period of the Contract. Award of Contract The award of any Contract may be made to the Consultant who submits the proposal which is in the best interest of the Village as evaluated by Village staff. Such evaluations will include the experience of the Consultant, capability of the Consultant, and other factors deemed by Village staff to be in the best interest of the Village. In addition, the Village reserves the rights to accept or reject any and all proposals, to waive any informality in any proposals, and to accept any proposals considered advantageous to the Village. Proposals Proposals should be addressed to: Casey Botterman Water/Sewer Superintendent Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Rd., Mount Prospect, IL 60056. Proposals can also be delivered via e-mail (cbotterman@mountprospect.org). All proposals should be clearly labeled in the following manner: Proposal for Engineering Services 2018 CIPP Program Construction Services Proposals due April 20th, 2018 All proposals must be received at the Mount Prospect Public Works facility no later than 12:00 PM local time on April 20th, 2018. #/34 02/0/3!, 4/ 6),,!'% /& -/5.4 02/30%#4 ΑΏΐΗ #´±¤£ȃ¨ȃ0« ¢¤ 0¨¯¤«¨¨¦ /¡²¤±µ ³¨® £ #®³± ¢³ !£¬¨¨²³± ³¨® 3´¡¬¨³³¤£ ¡¸Ȁ " ·³¤± ǉ 7®®£¬ Ǿ )¢ȁ #®²´«³¨¦ %¦¨¤¤±² www.baxterwoodman.com &¤¡±´ ±¸ ΑΖǾ ΑΏΐΗ Cost Proposal Page 2 #/34 02/0/3!, Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois 2018 CIPP Observation & Contract Administration Cost Proposal TaskHoursFeeNotes General Construction Administration Attend pre-construction meeting3$ 435 Check/review submittals4$ 580 Prepare pay requests/change orders16$ 2,320 Attend project meetings (4)16$ 2,320 TOTAL GCA39$ 5,655 Office Services Review/approve pre-lining videos6$ 870 Review liner thickness calculations1$ 145 Review post-lining videos and enter into Hansen Database16$ 2,320 Review/approve CIPP sample testing1$ 145 Update Annual Combined Sewer Assessment spreadsheet2$ 290 Review MPI bidding documents/ and edit as necessary for 2017 work8$ 1,160 TOTAL OFFICE SERVICES34$ 4,930 Field Observation - minumum 8"- 18" liners270$ 36,4504.5 hrs. x 60 liners 21" - 36" liners152$ 20,5208 hrs. x 19 liners Mileage allowance$ 2,500 SUBTOTAL OBSERVATION$ 59,470 Field Observation - Recommended 8"- 18" liners360$ 48,6006 hrs. x 60 liners 21" - 36" liners228$ 30,78012 hrs. x 19 liners Mileage allowance$ 2,500 SUBTOTAL OBSERVATION$ 81,880 Price per Additional Segment Lined 12"-18"$ 608 21"-33"$ 1,080 Annual increase from 2015 (percent)0% Village of Mount Prospect Cost Proposal Page 3 -!.(/52 %34)-!4% 4§¤ ¤²³¨¬ ³¤£ ¬ §®´±² ¥®± -®´³ 0±®²¯¤¢³Ȍ² ΑΏΐΗ #)00 ¯±®©¤¢³² ±¤ ¡ ²¤£ ® ³§¤ ¥®««®¶¨¦ ³ ²ª²Ȁ '¤¤± « #®²³±´¢³¨® !£¬¨¨²³± ³¨®Ȁ • !³³¤£ ¯±¤ȃ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¬¤¤³¨¦Ǿ ¯±¤¯ ±¤ ²´¬¬ ±¸ • 2¤µ¨¤¶ ¢®³± ¢³®±Ȍ² ²¢§¤£´«¤ • #§¤¢ªǾ ±¤µ¨¤¶Ǿ £ ¯¯±®µ¤ «¨¤± £¤²¨¦ ¢ «¢´« ³¨®² • 2¤µ¨¤¶ £ ¯¯±®µ¤ ±¤°´¨±¤£ ²´¡¬¨³³ «² • • 0±¤¯ ±¤ #§ ¦¤ /±£¤±² ² ¯¯±®µ¤£ ¡¸ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤ • 2¤µ¨¤¶ £ ¯±®¢¤²² ¢®³± ¢³®±Ȍ² 0 ¸ 2¤°´¤²³² • 2¤²¤ ±¢§ £ ±¤²¯®£ ³® ¢®³± ¢³®±Ȍ² ±¤°´¤²³ ¥®± ¨¥®±¬ ³¨® • 0±®µ¨£¤ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ¶ ±± ³¸ £ ¨µ¤±² ±¸ ¶®±ª ¡¸ ³§¤ ¢®³± ¢³®±Ȩ²ȩ • 5¯£ ³¤ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤Ȍ² ®¦®¨¦ Ȩ ´ «ȩ ²¯±¤ £²§¤¤³ ¥®± ¶®±ª ¢®¬¯«¤³¤£ ¨ ΑΏΐΗ • 2¤µ¨¤¶ ¯®²³ȃ«¨¨¦ µ¨£¤®² £ ¤³¤± ¨²¯¤¢³¨® £ ³ ¨³® ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤Ȍ² ( ²¤ £ ³ ¡ ²¤ &¨¤«£ 2¤¯±¤²¤³ ³¨®Ȁ • • • 2¤µ¨¤¶ £ ¯¯±®µ¤ ¯±¤ȃ £ ¯®²³ȃ«¨¨¦ µ¨£¤® ¨²¯¤¢³¨®² • 0±®µ¨£¤ ¶¤¤ª«¸ ´¯£ ³¤² ® ³§¤ ²³ ³´² ®¥ #)00 ¯±®©¤¢³ ¨¢«´£¨¦ ¯±¤ȃ £ ¯®²³ȃ«¨¨¦ µ¨£¤® ±¤µ¨¤¶²Ǿ £ ³¤² «¨¤£Ǿ ²ȃ¡´¨«³ °´ ³¨³¨¤²Ǿ £ ´¯ ³® £ ³¤ ¢®²³²ȁ • 2¤²¯®£ ³® ±¤²¨£¤³²Ȍ °´¤²³¨®² £ ¢®¢¤±² £ ¯±®µ¨£¤ ¢¢¤¯³ ¡«¤ ²®«´³¨® • #®««¤¢³ «¨¨¦ ² ¬¯«¤² ¥±®¬ ¤ ¢§ #)00 ¨²³ ««¤£ £ ±¤µ¨¤¶ « ¡®± ³®±¸ ³¤²³ ±¤²´«³² ¥®± ¢®¬¯«¨ ¢¤ ¶¨³§ ³§¤ £¤²¨¦ ¯ ± ¬¤³¤±² • ³§¤ ¶®±ª ¨² ¢®¬¯«¤³¤£ ³® ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤Ȍ² ² ³¨²¥ ¢³¨® • 0±®µ¨£¤ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ¶ ±± ³¸ £ ¨µ¤±² ±¸ ¶®±ª ² ¤¤£¤£ ³® ²²¨²³ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤ ¨ ¤¥®±¢¨¦ ¢« ¨¬Ǿ ¶ ±± ³¸ ®± ¦´ ± ³¤¤ ¦ ¨²³ ³§¤ ¢®³± ¢³®±Ȩ²ȩ Village of Mount Prospect Cost Proposal Page 4 "!84%2 ǉ 7//$-!.Ǿ ).#ȁ ΑΏΐΗ (/52,9 "),,).' 2!4%3 !.$ %80%.3% )4%-3 &/2 02/&%33)/.!, 3%26)#%3 %-0,/9%% #,!33)&)#!4)/. (/52,9 "),,).' 2!4%3 Principal$190 3¤¨®± %¦¨¤¤± ))) ³® )6$150³® $175 3¤¨®± %¦¨¤¤± ) ³® ))$125³® $140 %¦¨¤¤± ))) ³® )6$105³® $115 %¦¨¤¤± ) ³® ))$90³® $95 %¦¨¤¤±¨¦ 4¤¢§¨¢¨ ))) ³® 6$115³® $145 %¦¨¤¤±¨¦ 4¤¢§¨¢¨ ) ³® ))$60³® $105 3¤¨®± '¤®«®¦¨²³$140 0±®¥¤²²¨® « 3´±µ¤¸®± )$145 !£¬¨¨²³± ³¨µ¤ 3´¯¯®±³ ) ³® )))$70³® $78 - ±ª¤³¨¦ 0±®¥¤²²¨® « ) ³® )))$70³® $80 !¢¢®´³¨¦ 0±®¥¤²²¨® « ) ³® )))$70³® $80 (®´±«¸ ± ³¤² ¥®± ¨²¯¤¢³¨® ²¤±µ¨¢¤² £® ®³ ¨¢«´£¤ ¸ ®µ¤±³¨¬¤ȁ 4§¤ %¦¨¤¤± ¬ ¸ £©´²³ ³§¤ §®´±«¸ ¡¨««¨¦ ± ³¤ £ ®´³ȃ®¥ȃ¯®¢ª¤³ ¤·¯¤²¤² ® ®± ¡®´³ * ´ ±¸ ΐ ®¥ ¤ ¢§ ²´¡²¤°´¤³ ¸¤ ± £ ¶¨«« ²¤£ ³§¤ ¤¶ ²¢§¤£´«¤ ³® ³§¤ /¶¤±ȁ (®´±«¸ "¨««¨¦ 2 ³¤² ¨¢«´£¤ £¨±¤¢³ « ¡®± £ ¨£¨±¤¢³ ®µ¤±§¤ £ ¤·¯¤²¤²Ǿ ±¤ £¨¤²² ³® ²¤±µ¤Ǿ £ ¯±®¥¨³Ǿ £ ±¤ ¥®± Η §®´±²ȝ£ ¸ £ ΓΏ §®´±²ȝ¶¤¤ª ±¤¦´« ±«¸ ²¢§¤£´«¤£ ¶®±ª §®´±²ȁ 0¤±²® «ȃ®¶¤£ µ¤§¨¢«¤ -¨«¤ ¦¤ #§ ±¦¤² ¶¨«« ¡¤ ±¤¨¬¡´±²¤£ ³ ³§¤ ± ³¤ ²¤³ ¡¸ ³§¤ 5ȁ3ȁ )³¤± « 2¤µ¤´¤ 3¤±µ¨¢¤ȁ #®¬¯ ¸ȃ®¶¤£ȝ«¤ ²¤£ µ¤§¨¢«¤ ´² ¦¤ ¶¨«« ¡¤ ±¤¨¬¡´±²¤£ ³ ± ³¤ ®¥ ͡ΕΔȁΏΏ ¯¤± £¨¤¬ ®± ͡ΒΑȁΔΏ ¯¤± § «¥ £¨¤¬ȁ 4± ¥¥¨¢ #®´³¤±² ͡ΔΏȝ£ ¸ȁ -¨®µ¨²¨® 4± ¥¥¨¢ 3¸²³¤¬ ´² ¦¤ ¶¨«« ¡¤ ±¤¨¬¡´±²¤£ ³ ± ³¤ ®¥ ͡ΕΏΏȁΏΏ ¯¤± £¨¤¬ £ ͡ΑΓȁΏΏ ¯¤± §®´± ¯±®¢¤²²¨¦ȁ 3´¡ȃ¢®²´«³ ³ ¢®²³² ¶¨«« ¡¤ ±¤¨¬¡´±²¤£ ³ ³§¤¨± ¨µ®¨¢¤ ¢®²³² ¯«´² Δυ Village of Mount Prospect 4%#(.)#!, 02/0/3!, 4/ 6),,!'% /& -/5.4 02/30%#4 ΑΏΐΗ #´±¤£ȃ¨ȃ0« ¢¤ 0¨¯¤«¨¨¦ /¡²¤±µ ³¨® £ #®³± ¢³ !£¬¨¨²³± ³¨® 3´¡¬¨³³¤£ ¡¸Ȁ " ·³¤± ǉ 7®®£¬ Ǿ )¢ȁ #®²´«³¨¦ %¦¨¤¤±² www.baxterwoodman.com &¤¡±´ ±¸ ΑΖǾ ΑΏΐΗ &¤¡±´ ±¸ ΑΖǾ ΑΏΐΗ -±ȁ 3¤ 0ȁ $®±²¤¸ $¨±¤¢³®± ®¥ 0´¡«¨¢ 7®±ª² 6¨«« ¦¤ ®¥ -®´³ 0±®²¯¤¢³ 0´¡«¨¢ 7®±ª² $¤¯ ±³¬¤³ ΐΖΏΏ 7ȁ #¤³± « 2£ȁ -®´³ 0±®²¯¤¢³Ǿ )««¨®¨² ΕΏΏΔΕ Subject: 6¨«« ¦¤ ®¥ -®´³ 0±®²¯¤¢³ ȃ ΕΓΔΛ #´±¤£ȃ¨ȃ0« ¢¤ 0¨¯¤«¨¨¦ /¡²¤±µ ³¨® £ #®³± ¢³ !£¬¨¨²³± ³¨® $¤ ± -±ȁ $®±²¤¸Ȁ ¯« ¤£ ¥®± ΑΏΐΗȁ 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± %±¨¢ -´± ´²ª ²Ǿ 0%Ǿ • • • • emurauskas@baxterwoodman.com jambrose@baxterwoodman.com Sincerely, "!84%2 ǉ 7//$-!.Ǿ ).#ȁ #/.35,4).' %.').%%23 President/CEO JVA:rk 6),,!'% /& -/5.4 02/30%#4 ΑΏΐΗ #´±¤£ȃ¨ȃ0« ¢¤ 0¨¯¤«¨¨¦ /¡²¤±µ ³¨® ǉ #®³± ¢³ !£¬¨¨²³± ³¨® • 180279.10 CONTENTS ȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁ &¨±¬ )¥®±¬ ³¨® ȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁ5 ȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁ6 !££¨³¨® « %·¯¤±¨¤¢¤ ȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁ8 +¤¸ 0¤±²®¤« ǉ 7®±ª«® £ ȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁȁ9 Village of Mount Prospect Approach & Methodology 4 ./ 4)-% /2 -/.%9 7!34%$Ǿ 7% +./7 -/5.4 02/30%#4ȅ 3¨¢¤ ΑΏΏΔǾ -®´³ 0±®²¯¤¢³ § ² ³±´²³¤£ " ·³¤± ǉ 7®®£¬ ³® ²²¨²³ ¶¨³§ ¢®¬¯«¤³¨® ®¥ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤Ȍ² ´ « ²¤¶¤± ²¸²³¤¬ ¨¬¯±®µ¤¬¤³²ȁ &´«« 3¤±µ¨¢¤ #®²³±´¢³¨® 0¤±²®¤« £ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ ¥®± µ ±¨¤³¸ ®¥ ¬´¨¢¨¯ « £¤¯ ±³¬¤³ ¨¢«´£¤² £¤¦±¤¤£ ¯±®¥¤²²¨® «² £ «¨¢¤²¤£ ¨ .!33#/Ȍ² #´±¤£ ¨ 0« ¢¤ 0¨¯¤ )²¯¤¢³®± 4± ¨¨¦ ¯±®¦± ¬Ǿ ¬ ª¨¦ §¨¬ ³§¤ ¨£¤ « «¤ £¤± ¥®± ³§¨² ¯±®©¤¢³ȁ #±¤ ³¨¦ ,®¢ « 2¤« ³¨®²§¨¯² ¶¨³§ 9®´± 2¤²¨£¤³² Village of Mount Prospect 5 &)2- ).&/2-!4)/. ³® ¯±®µ¨£¤ ²´²³ ¨ ¡«¤Ǿ ¨®µ ³¨µ¤ ²®«´³¨®²ȁ /´± ¡¤¸®£ ³¸¯¨¢ « ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ ¢®²´«³¨¦ȁ 7¤ ±¤ ¢®¬¬¨³³¤£ ³® ¡´¨«£¨¦ ¢®¬¬´¨³¸ µ «´¤ UTILITY REHABILITATION •Cured-in-Place-Pipe • (CIPP) Lining •Tunneling or Auguring •Slip-Lining • •Spiral-Wound Lining •Pilot-Tube Microtunneling •Spray-On Epoxy Lining •Open Cut Repair • •Point Repair from Trenchless Technology Magazine as an industry leader in trenchless techniques! Village of Mount Prospect Previous Experience With The Village 6 6),,!'% /& -/5.4 02/30%#4 !´ « #)00 ǉ 3¯®³ 2¤¯ ¨± 0±®¦± ¬²Ǿ ΑΏΏΔȃ0±¤²¤³ 2011 CIPP LINING '¤¤± « #®²³±´¢³¨® !£¬¨¨²³± ³¨®Ȁ •!³³¤£ ¯±¤ȃ¡¨£ ¬¤¤³¨¦Ǿ ¯±¤¯ ±¤ ²´¬¬ ±¸ • • • • • • 2011 SPOT REPAIRS • • • • ¢®¬¯«¤³¤£ • &¨¤«£ 2¤¯±¤²¤³ ³¨®Ȁ • • day 2012 SPOT REPAIRS • • ´¯ ³® £ ³¤ ¢®²³²ȁ • ¢¢¤¯³ ¡«¤ ²®«´³¨® • • satisfaction • Village of Mount Prospect Previous Experience With The Village 7 6),,!'% /& -/5.4 02/30%#4 #®¬¡¨¤£ 3¤¶¤± 3¸²³¤¬ %µ «´ ³¨®Ǿ ')3Ǿ $¤²¨¦Ǿ HIGHLIGHTS £ #®²³±´¢³¨® !²²¨²³ ¢¤ Ȩ®¦®¨¦ȩ SERVICES: TEAM: CONTACT: "® ±£ ¢®³± ¢³¤£ " ·³¤± ǉ 7®®£¬ Ǿ )¢ȁ ³® ¢®£´¢³ ¤·¢ µ ³¨® £ ±¤¯« ¢¤¬¤³ ®¥ ²¤¢³¨® ®¥ ¯¨¯¤ ¯±¨®± ³® #)00 ¨²³ «« ³¨®ȁ ²¤±µ¨¢¤ «¨¥¤ȁ Village of Mount Prospect 8 !$$)4)/.!, %80%2)%.#% 6),,!'% /& (/&&-!. %34!4%3 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 2¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® " ·³¤± ǉ 7®®£¬ ¯¤±¥®±¬¤£ £¤²¨¦ ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ £ ¨²³ «« ³¨® ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΐΔΏǾΏΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ #´±¤£ ¨ ¨ £¨ ¬¤³¤±ȁ 6),,!'% /& ,!+% ",5&& 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 2¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® Village of Mount Prospect Key Personnel & Workload 9 9®´± 0±®©¤¢³ .¤¤£² 7¨«« "¤ -¤³ "¸ ! 4¤ ¬ ®¥ & ¬¨«¨ ± £ 2¤ £¨«¸ !µ ¨« ¡«¤ %·¯¤±³²ȅ ®¥ ¨¬¯±®µ¤¬¤³²ȁ 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± %±¨¢ -´± ´²ª ² %±¨¢Ȍ² ¶®±ª«® £ ±¤²¯®²¨¡¨«¨³¨¤² § µ¤ ¡¤¤ ±¤µ¨¤¶¤£Ǿ £ §¤ ¢ ¥´««¸ ¢¢¤¯³ ³§¤ ±¤²¯®²¨¡¨«¨³¸ ®¥ ¢®¬¯«¤³¨¦ ¸®´± ¯±®©¤¢³ ¨ PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE VILLAGE CONTACT PROJECT MANAGER AVAILABLE SUPPORT Village of Mount Prospect Key Personnel & Workload 10 Eric J. Murauskas, PE Project Manager %±¨¢ ¨² ¶¤«« µ¤±²¤£ ¨ ¬ ¸ ±¤ ² ¨¢«´£¨¦ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨®Ǿ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ¤µ «´ ³¨® ²³´£¨¤²Ǿ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ¥«®¶ ¬®¨³®±¨¦Ǿ ²³®±¬¶ ³¤± £± ¨ ¦¤ ²³´£¨¤²Ǿ ²¤¶¤± ²¸²³¤¬ £¤²¨¦Ǿ £ ¬´¨¢¨¯ « ²¤±µ¨¢¤²ȁ (¤ «²® § ² £¤µ¤«®¯¤£ ²³±®¦ ¤·¯¤±³¨²¤ ¨ ¶ ³¤± ²´¯¯«¸ ¶¤«« £¤²¨¦Ǿ ³¤²³ ¶¤«« £±¨««¨¦ ¯±®¦± ¬²Ǿ £ ¶ ³¤± ³±¤ ³¬¤³ ¯« ³ £¤²¨¦ȁ %±¨¢ ±¤¢¤³«¸ ¢®¬¯«¤³¤£ ³§¤ #)00 )²¯¤¢³®± 4± ¨¨¦ £ #¤±³¨¥¨¢ ³¨® 0±®¦± ¬ ¥±®¬ .!33#/Ǿ )¢ȁ .!33#/Ȍ² )²¯¤¢³®± 4± ¨¨¦ £ #¤±³¨¥¨¢ ³¨® 0±®¦± ¬ Ȩ)4#0ȩ ¨² ¤¶ ²³ £ ±£ ³¨® « ³± ¨¨¦ £ ¢¤±³¨¥¨¢ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ³§ ³ ¯±®µ¨£¤² ¥¨¤«£ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¯±®¥¤²²¨® «² ¶¨³§ ¢®¬¯±¤§¤²¨µ¤ «¤ ±¨¦ £ ³®®«² ³® ´£¤±²³ £ £ ¨²¯¤¢³ ³±¤¢§«¤²² ¯¨¯¤«¨¤ ±¤¤¶ « ³¤¢§®«®¦¸ȁ Representative Projects Education Moun³ 0±®²¯¤¢³Ǿ IL B.S. Civil Engineering, Iowa !´ « #)00 ,¨¨¦ 0±®¦± ¬ #®²³±´¢³¨® )²¯¤¢³¨® State University, 1989 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ²²¨²³¨¦ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤ ¶¨³§ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ®¡²¤±µ ³¨® ¥®± ²¤¶¤± ²¸²³¤¬ ¨¬¯±®µ¤¬¤³² ²¨¢¤ ΑΏΏΔȁ )¬¯±®µ¤¬¤³² § µ¤ ¨¢«´£¤£ #)00 «¨¨¦ £ Joined Firm in 1989 3¯®³ 2¤« ¸² ³§ ³ µ¤± ¦¤ ¤²³¨¬ ³¤£ ͡ΐ ¬¨««¨® ´ « ¢®²³±´¢³¨® µ «´¤ȁ Years of Experience: 29 (®¥¥¬ %²³ ³¤²Ǿ ), ΑΏΐΒ #±¨³¨¢ « 3¤¶¤± 2¤¯ ¨±² 2015-ΑΏΐΕ 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 2¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® Continuing 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ¥®± ³§¤ £¤²¨¦ £ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ ¥®± ³§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® Education ®¥ ³§¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ²¸²³¤¬ ´²¨¦ ¢´±¤£-in-¯« ¢¤ ¯¨¯¤ Ȩ#)00ȩ ¥®± ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ Annual courses conducted by 150,000 ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ¢´±¤£ ¨ ¯« ¢¤ ¯¨¯¤ȁ 4§¤ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¨¢«´£¤£ ¯« ¢¤¬¤³ ®¥ Marsh-McBirney that include ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ 710 ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ΐ8-¨¢§ £ ΒΒΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ Β6-¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤± ¬ §®«¤-to- instruction ranging from site ¬ §®«¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± «iningǿ £ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ®¥ ¥¨µ¤ ¬ §®«¤² ³® ±¤¯ ¨± £ selection and flow meter ¯±®³¤¢³ ³§¤ ²³±´¢³´±¤² ¥±®¬ § ¹ ±£®´² ¢§¤¬¨¢ «² ¢®±±®²¨®ȁ installation to analysis of flow , ª¤ "«´¥¥Ǿ ), data 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 2ehabilitation 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ¥®± ³§¤ £¤²¨¦ ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ £ ®-²¨³¤ ¨²¯¤¢³¨® ²¤±µ¨¢¤² ¥®± ³§¤ Training courses in the use of ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®©¤¢³ȁ %±¨¢ -´± ´²ª ² £¤²¨¦¤£ £ ®¡²¤±µ¤£ ³§¤ Visual-Modflow, a software ¨²³ «« ³¨® ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΐΔǾΏΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ #´±¤£ ¨ 0« ¢¤ 0¨¯¤ Ȩ#)00ȩǾ ± ¦¨¦ ¨ package for modeling ²¨¹¤ ¥±®¬ Η-¨¢§ ³® ΓΑ-¨¢§ ¨ £¨ameter. groundwater movement "´¥¥ «® '±®µ¤Ǿ IL Training courses for well design ΑΏΐΒ 3³®±¬ 3¤¶¤± 2¤¯ ¨±² and rehabilitation 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ¥®± ¢®£¨³¨® ²²¤²²¬¤³ ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΔǾΔΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ²³®±¬ ²¤¶¤± £ £¤µ¤«®¯¬¤³ ®¥ ¯±¨®±¨³¨¹¤£ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ȁ The ¢®£¨³¨® Training courses for the use of ²²¤²²¬¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¤¶¤± ¯¨¯¤² ¶ ² ¬ £¤ ¥±®¬ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® WaterCAD, a software package µ¨£¤®²ȁ The ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® £¤²¨¦ ¶ ² £¤µ¤«®¯¤£ using a ¢®¬¡¨ ³¨® ®¥ cured-in- for modeling water distribution ¯« ¢¤ ¯¨¯¤ Ȩ#)00ȩ £ ®¯¤ ¤·¢ µ ³¨® ¬¤³§®£²ȁ 4§¤ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¨¢«´£¤£ systems ¯« ¢¤¬¤³ ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ 1ǾΖΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ¬ §®«¤-to-¬ §®«¤ ²torm ²¤¶¤± «¨¨¦Ǿ ± ¦¨¦ ¨ ²¨¹¤ ¥±®¬ 10-¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤± ³® 21-¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤±ǿ £ ®¯¤ ¢´³ ²¯®³ Registrations r¤¯ ¨±² ¨ ¥®´± «®¢ ³¨®². Licensed Professional Engineer: Illinois www.baxterwoodman.com Village of Mount Prospect Key Personnel & Workload 11 Eric J. Murauskas, PE Page 2 of 2 # ±¸Ǿ )L Certifications ΑΏΐΐ 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 3¸²³¤¬ 2¤§ ¡ilitation Manhole Assessment 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ¥®± ¨³¤± « ²¤¶¤± ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΐΕǾΏΏΏ Certification Program, ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤Ȍ² ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤±²ȁ ! ¢®£¨³¨® ²²¤²²¬¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¤¶¤± ¯¨¯¤² NASSCO, Inc. ¶ ² ¬ £¤ ¥±®¬ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ³§¤ ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® µ¨£¤®² £ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¶ ² £¤µ¤«®¯¤£ȁ 4§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¢®²¨²³¤£ ®¥ Lateral Assessment Certification ³§¤ £¤²¨¦ £ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ ¥®± ³§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ®¥ ³§¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ Program, NASSCO, Inc. ²¤¶¤± ²¸²³¤¬ ´²¨¦ ¢´±¤£-in-¯« ¢¤ ¯¨¯¤ Ȩ#)00ȩȁ 4§¤ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¨¢«´£¤£ Pipeline Assessment ¯« ¢¤¬¤³ ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΐΐǾΏΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ Η-¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤± ¬ §®«¤-to-¬ §®«¤ Certification Program ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± «¨¨¦ȁ NASSCO, Inc. +¨±ª« £Ǿ ), ΑΏΐΑ 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 3¸²³¤¬ 2¤§ ¡¨«¨tation Associations 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ¥®± ¨³¤± « ²¤¶¤± ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΗǾΔΏΏ American Public Works ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤Ȍ² ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤±²ȁ ! ¢®£¨³¨® ²²¤²²¬¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¤¶¤± ¯¨¯¤² Association ¶ ² ¬ £¤ ¥±®¬ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ³§¤ ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® µ¨£¤®² £ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± rehabilita³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¶ ² £¤µ¤«®¯¤£ȁ 4§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¢®²¨²³¤£ ®¥ American Water Works ³§¤ £¤²¨¦ £ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ ¥®± ³§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ®¥ ³§¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ Association ²¤¶¤± ²¸²³¤¬ ´²¨¦ ¢´±¤£-in-¯« ¢¤ ¯¨¯¤ Ȩ#)00ȩȁ 4§¤ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¨¢«´£¤£ ¯« ¢¤¬¤³ ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΓǾΖΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ¬ §®«¤-to-¬ §®«¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± National Groundwater «¨¨¦Ǿ ± ¦¨¦ ¨ ²¨¹¤ ¥±®¬ Η-¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤± ³® ΐΏ-¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤±ȁ Association +¨±ª« £Ǿ ), Water Environment Federation ΑΏΐΒ 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 3¸²³¤¬ 2¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ¥®± ¨³¤± « ²¤¶¤± ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ 15,0ΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤Ȍ² ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤±²ȁ ! ¢®£¨³¨® ²²¤²²¬¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¤¶¤± ¯¨¯¤² ¶ ² ¬ £¤ ¥±®¬ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ³§¤ ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® µ¨£¤®² £ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¶ ² £¤µ¤«®¯¤£ȁ 4§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¢®²¨²³¤£ ®¥ ³§¤ £¤²¨¦ £ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ ¥®± ³§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ®¥ ³§¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ²¸²³¤¬ ´²¨¦ ¢´±¤£-in-¯« ¢¤ ¯¨¯¤ Ȩ#)00ȩȁ 4§¤ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¶¨«« ¨¢«´£¤ ¯« ¢¤¬¤³ ®¥ ¬ §®«¤-to-¬ §®«¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± «¨¨¦Ǿ ± ¦¨¦ ¨ ²¨¹¤ ¥±®¬ Η- ¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤± ³® ΐ2-¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤±ȁ -¨²²¨® "±®®ª 3 ¨³ ±¸ $¨²³±¨¢³Ǿ IL 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 3¸²³¤¬ 2¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ¥®± ³§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΐΕǾΐΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ´²¨¦ ¢´±¤£-in-¯« ¢¤ ¯¨¯¤ Ȩ#)00ȩǾ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ Αΐ ¯®¨³ ±¤¯ ¨±² ´²¨¦ #)00Ǿ £ Ε ¤·¢ µ ³¤ £ ±¤¯« ¢¤ ±¤¯ ¨±²ȁ 4§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¶®±ª wa² ¡ ²¤£ ® ®´± ±¤µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ³§¤ ¢®¬¯«¤³¤£ ¨³¤± « ¯¨¯¤ ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨®s. 3®´³§ " ±±¨¦³®Ǿ ), ΑΏΐΑ 3 ¨³ ±¸ 3¤¶¤± 3¸²³¤¬ 2¤§ ¡ilitation 0±®©¤¢³ - ¦¤± ¥®± ¨³¤± « ²¤¶¤± ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΖǾΏΏΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ 6¨«« ¦¤Ȍ² ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤±²ȁ ! ¢®£¨³¨® ²²¤²²¬¤³ ®¥ ³§¤ ²¤¶¤± ¯¨¯¤² ¶ ² ¬ £¤ ¥±®¬ ±¤µ¨¤¶ ®¥ ³§¤ ³¤«¤µ¨²¨® ¨²¯¤¢³¨® µ¨£¤®² £ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¶ ² £¤µ¤«®¯¤£ȁ 4§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ¯±®¦± ¬ ¢®²¨²³¤£ ®¥ ³§¤ £¤²¨¦ £ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¤¦¨¤¤±¨¦ ¥®± ³§¤ ±¤§ ¡¨«¨³ ³¨® ®¥ ³§¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± ²¸²³¤¬ ´²¨¦ ¢´±¤£-in-¯« ¢¤ ¯¨¯¤ Ȩ#)00ȩȁ 4§¤ ¢®²³±´¢³¨® ¨¢«´£¤£ ¯« ¢¤¬¤³ ®¥ ¯¯±®·¨¬ ³¤«¸ ΐǾΕΔΏ ¥¤¤³ ®¥ ΐΏ-¨¢§ £ ΐΕ-¨¢§ £¨ ¬¤³¤± ¬ §®«¤- to-¬ §®«¤ ² ¨³ ±¸ ²¤¶¤± «¨¨¦ȁ www.baxterwoodman.com Village of Mount Prospect