HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.1 Levee 37 Storm Sewer Improvements Design Engineering11/6/2017 BoardDocs® Pro
&
Agenda Item Details
Meeting Nov 07, 2017 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m.
Category 8. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Subject 8.1 Motion to accept proposal for Levee 37 Storm Sewer Improvements Design Engineering in
an amount not to exceed $287,373.
Type Action
Preferred Date Nov 07, 2017
Absolute Date Nov 07, 2017
Fiscal Impact Yes
Dollar Amount 287,373.00
Budgeted Yes
Budget Source Flood Control Construction Fund
Recommended Action Accept the proposal for Levee 37 Storm Sewer Improvements Design Engineering services
submitted by Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd., of Rosemont, Illinois in an an amount not
to exceed $287,373.
Background
Levee 37 is an earthen levee and sheet pile/concrete floodwall constructed on the west side of the Des Plaines River to
provide flood protection for residents and businesses in Mount Prospect and Prospect Heights. It extends along Des
Plaines River Road from an origin north of Euclid Avenue to Milwaukee Avenue and onward to Palatine Road.
Levee 37 was designed to protect homes and businesses from inundation by the Des Plaines River. The levee wall serves
as a physical barrier between record river crests and the adjacent residential neighborhoods. It was designed and
constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Local partners included the Illinois Department of Natural
Resources (IDNR), the City of Prospect Heights (Prospect Heights), and the Village of Mount Prospect (the Village).
Construction was completed in 2011.
The design of the levee system includes three (3) pumping stations. Two (2) of these pumping stations are situated in
Mount Prospect (Pump Station 1 and Pump Station 2). The third pumping station is located in Prospect Heights. The
attached map depicts the levee line of protection, pump station locations, and drainage basins.
The levee provides effective protection from river flooding. It was tested by the record Des Plaines River crest in 2013
and several subsequent elevated crests that would have generated flooding conditions if the levee were not constructed.
It is effective because it forms a complete seal between the river and adjacent land. This seal prevents the river from
overtopping its banks. However, it also prevents rain water collected in the storm sewers tributary to the levee from
discharging to the river.
When the river level rises, backwater valves on the storm sewer discharge pipes close; isolating the storm sewers from
the river. These devices prevent river water from flooding adjacent neighborhoods via the storm sewer system. This
mode of flooding occurred during a river crest in 1987 that damaged dozens of homes and rendered local streets
impassable for days.
http://www.boarddoes.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 1/4
11/6/2017 BoardDocs® Pro
When the storm sewer backwater valves are closed, rainwater that falls in the neighborhoods near the levee is diverted
to the pumping stations. The pumping stations were designed and constructed by the USACE as part of the levee project.
The pumps have the capacity to discharge water at a combined rate of 60 cubic feet per second (CFS).
Under normal weather and river conditions, rainwater is collected by the storm sewer system and conveyed to the river
viarg avity discharge (no pumping stations) at a rate of approximately 240 CFS.
The original design of the levee system assumed that the circumstance where the river level is high, storm sewer
backwater valves are closed, and significant rain falls in adjacent neighborhoods was rare. However, it is our experience
that this condition is much more commonplace. Street and structure flooding occurs because of the inadequate pump
station discharge rate.
In 2015, the Village engaged Christopher B. Burke Engineering. Ltd. (CBBEL) to conduct an analysis of the storm sewers
tributary to Levee 37; including the pumping stations. Their final report is enclosed as Attachment B. The report
concludes that pumping station and storm sewer system improvements should be constructed to increase the drainage
basin discharge rate from 60 CFS to 240 CFS during elevated river levels. USACE and IDNR concur with this
recommendation. This proposed work would include modification of the existing levee pumping stations as well as
construction of storm sewers and storm water detention facilities in the residential neighborhoods adjacent to the levee.
USACE has agreed to design and construct the pump station improvements. They are owed a balance of funds from IDNR
for expenditures made during levee construction. Pursuant to the agreement between USACE and IDNR, some of these
expenditures are the responsibility of IDNR. USACE is seeking reimbursement of these funds and has indicated they will
utilize reimbursed monies to fund pump station improvements. Attachment C is a letter from USACE Levee 37 Project
Manager Jeff Zuercher to IDNR Office of Water Resources Engineering Studies Section Chief Rick Gosch requesting
reimbursement of $2,971,130.18. IDNR has verbally indicated the amount could be remitted in January 2018 provided
the Governor's Office of Management and Budget authorizes the expenditure. USACE and Village staff are optimistic that
this balance due is adequate to fund desired pump station improvements.
Staff now proposes to initiate design of the companion Alternative 3 and Alternative 6 storm sewer improvements
recommended in the 2015 CBBEL Levee 37 Drainage Study. Alternative 3 improvements include construction of relief
storm sewers and a 11.6 acre-foot storm water detention facility near Robert Frost School. Alternative 6 improvements
include new relief storm sewers and a 7 acre-foot storm water detention facility near Indian Grove School. The estimated
cost to construct these facilities is $3.2 million. Funding for these projects must be locally derived. Excess funds in the
Levee 37 appropriation cannot be utilized for the construction of local storm sewers without explicit authority from the
U.S. Congress.
Staff envisions that each component of this proposed project, including the pump station improvements, Alternative 3
improvements (Robert Frost School area), and Alternative 6 improvements (Indian Grove School area) can be pursued
independently as distinct projects or collectively as a single endeavor. Provided USACE receives timely reimbursement of
funds from IDNR, staff expects that pump station improvement designs will be completed by 2018 and ready for
construction in 2019. We propose to pursue a similar schedule for the design of Alternative 3 and Alternative 6
improvements. Adherence to this schedule will avail an opportunity to realize economies of scale by constructing all
components as a unified project. Pursuit of this timeline will also facilitate completion of plans and specifications in
advance of construction. Completed construction plans, or "shovel ready" projects, present the best opportunity to
secure grant or low-interest loan funding. As a recourse in the event grant or low-interest loan funding is not available,
staff has planned a $3.36 million expenditure from the Flood Control Construction Fund for the construction of Alternative
3 and Alternative 6 improvements in 2019.
Request for Proposals (RFP)
To design these improvements, staff requires technical assistance from a qualified civil engineering consultant.
Accordingly, staff prepared a detailed request for proposals (RFP) necessary to solicit these services. A copy of this RFP
is enclosed as Attachment D. Consulting engineers were asked to submit a technical proposal detailing the firm's
background, key personnel, and approach to the project. In addition, each firm was also asked to submit a separate cost
proposal indicating work effort anticipated and a not -to -exceed fee. The required scope of work included topography and
field data collection; preparation of plans and bid documents; meetings and presentations to school and park district
boards, staff, and other stakeholders; solicitation of grant funding or low-interest financial aid; and obtaining all
necessary regulatory permits (USACE, IDNR, IEPA, IDOT, etc.). RFPs were distributed to four (4) local engineering firms
with expertise in the design and construction of storm water management systems.
RFP Results
Four (4) technical proposals and four (4) cost proposals were received. Each proposal was evaluated based on the
background of the firm, related project experience, proposed services and scope of work, schedule, work effort, and
proposal content. Attachment E provides further explanation of these evaluation criteria. Each firm received a point
hftp://www.boarddoes.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 2/4
11/6/2017
BoardDocs® Pro
ranking (total points = 100) for each criteria. Table 1 below summarizes this analysis:
TaDle x - consultant Kan Kings
Category
Max.
Christopher
Total Cost
Burns &
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Gewalt Hamilton
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Baxter &
2,500$239,876
Gewalt
$96
PointsBurke
2,088
McDonnell
$129
Woodman
Hamilton
.............................................
Background20
__________________............................................................
Burns & McDonnell
19
.............................................................
18
..............................................................
15
......................................
8
.............................................
Experience
__________________
20
_____________________________..................................................................................................................................................................
19
14
18
18
.............................................
Scope25
__________________
_____________________________.................................................................................................................................................................
24
18
15
10
..............................................................................................................................................
Schedue
10
...................................................................................................
.....................................................1...5
Work Effort
10
...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,1,3
8
6
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..............................5
9
.................................
5
........�.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Content
10
10
9
5
3
............................................ .
Total:
-----------.1.0.0
................................................._93
....................................................7.5
.....................................................67
51
The highest rated firm was Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Limited (CBBEL) of Rosemont, Illinois. The CBBEL proposal
provided numerous examples of storm water projects that integrated municipal, school district, park district, and
regulatory agency stakeholders. Examples cited included successful projects in Park Ridge, Bartlett, Deer Park, Elmwood
Park, River Forest, and Winnetka. In addition, their proposed project team members have unique experience as authors
of a recent flood study in the City of Prospect Heights as well as the Village of Mount Prospect's 2015 Levee 37 Flood
Study. Furthermore, the firm was intrinsically involved in the Village's successful efforts to petition USACE for pump
station upgrades and IDNR for authorization to increase the pump station discharge rate from 60 cfs to 240 cfs. Finally,
the firm's principal, Christohper B. Burke, holds a PhD in civil engineering and is a professor of civil engineering at the
University of Illinois -Chicago. He wields national renown as a storm water management subject matter expert offering a
distinct cachet that could serve the Village's interests well in interactions with the school district, park district, USACE,
IDNR, and other stakeholders. It is the opinion staff that CBBEL is the best qualified firm to design the proposed Levee
37 storm water improvements. CBBEL's technical proposal is enclosed as Attachment F.
Each firm was asked to submit a cost proposal as well. Table 2 below summarizes staff's analysis of costs:
TaDle z - cost Proposal summaries
FirmHours
Total Cost
Cost / Hour
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Gewalt Hamilton
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2,500$239,876
________----------------______________.
________----------------______________.
$96
Baxter & Woodman
...................................................................................................................................................................
2,088
$268,360
$129
Christopher B. Burke1,885
............................................................................................................................
..................................................................
$287,373 ________----------------_______________
$152
Burns & McDonnell
1,170
$199,879
$171
ve... ........................................................................................
rages:
.,
....
$248.....,...8.....72
$137
Staff estimated 2,100 hours to complete the project at an approximate cost of $315,000 ($150/hour). Design
engineering services and bid document preparation are estimated to be approximately 8-10% of anticipated construction
costs ($3.2 million).
The lowest cost proposal was submitted by Burns & McDonnell of Itasca, Illinois. However, it is staffs opinion that Burns
& McDonnell does not appropriate sufficient resources and work effort to successfully prosecute the project.
The second lowest cost proposal was submitted by Baxter & Woodman of Crystal Lake, Illinois. However, it is the opinion
of staff that CBBEL has submitted a more qualitative proposal and assembled a uniquely qualified project team that will
better serve the Village's needs.
CBBEL cost proposal is 14-1/2% higher than the average cost proposal received for this project. It is 9.2% lower than
staff's anticipated cost ($315,000). A copy of CBBEL's submitted cost proposal is enclosed as Attachment G.
It is staff's opnion that CBBEL understands the proposed project, has prepared a thorough proposal based on extensive
and unique experience, and is best qualified to perform the work. Staff has also concluded that CBBEL has allocated
sufficient work effort (1,885 hours) and their average hourly rate ($152) is competitive.
Alternatives
1. Accept proposal for Levee 37 Storm Sewer Improvements design engineering services submitted by Christopher B.
Burke Engineering, Ltd.
2. Action at discretion of Village Board.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal for Levee 37 Storm Sewer Improvements Design
Engineering Services submitted by Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. of Rosemont, Illinois in an amount not to
exceed $287,373.
http://www.boarddoes.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 3/4
11/6/2017
BoardDocs® Pro
http://www.boarddoes.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Public 4/4
11/8/2017
ATTACHMENT A _ LEVEE 37.JPG (432X568)
http://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/files/ASALML5615BC/$file/ATTACHMENT%20A%20_%20LEVEE%2037.JPG 1 /1
Levee 37 Drainage Study
Mount Prospect, IL
Prepared for
Village of Mount Prospect, IL
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
September 22, 2015
Prepared by
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.
9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600
Rosemont, IL 60018
CBBEL Project No. 15-0225
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
uo
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tableof Contents............................................................................................................................... i
Listof Tables......................................................................................................................................ii
Listof Figures.....................................................................................................................................ii
Listof Exhibits...................................................................................................................................iii
Appendices
ExecutiveSummary............................................................................................................................2
Chapter1 Introduction................................................................................................................5
— Pump Station #2 Upgrade & Proposed Prospect Heights Pump Station............
Chapter 2 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................................10
3.3
2.1 Existing Conditions Description...................................................................................................10
— Pump Station #2 Upgrade & Proposed Upstream Storage ................................
2.1 Model Development...................................................................................................................13
3.4
2.2 Model Calibration........................................................................................................................13
— Pump Station #2 Upgrade & Proposed Sewer Improvements ...........................
2.3 Pump Analysis.............................................................................................................................14
3.5
2.4 System Capacity..........................................................................................................................16
— Pump Station #1 Upgrade...................................................................................
Chapter 3 Proposed Conditions..................................................................................................20
3.6
3.1 Alternative 1— Pump Station #2 Upgrade...................................................................................
20
3.2
Alternative 2
— Pump Station #2 Upgrade & Proposed Prospect Heights Pump Station............
21
3.3
Alternative 3
— Pump Station #2 Upgrade & Proposed Upstream Storage ................................
24
3.4
Alternative 4
— Pump Station #2 Upgrade & Proposed Sewer Improvements ...........................
25
3.5
Alternative 5
— Pump Station #1 Upgrade...................................................................................
27
3.6
Alternative 6
— Pump Station #1 Upgrade & Proposed Upstream Storage ................................
28
3.7 Alternative 7 — Pump Station #1 Upgrade & Proposed Sewer Improvements ........................... 29
3.8 Alternative 8 — 25 -Year Level of Protection Improvement......................................................... 31
3.9 Alternative 9 — 25 -Year Level -of -Protection Improvement With Allowable Pumping Rate ....... 34
3.10 Pump Station Design Considerations.......................................................................................... 35
Chapter 4 DPR Downstream Impacts Analysis.............................................................................36
4.1 Design Storms Downstream Impacts Analysis............................................................................ 36
4.2 Downstream Impacts Analysis Conclusion.................................................................................. 37
Chapter5 Conclusion.................................................................................................................39
Christopher B. Burke Engineering. Ltd.
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. April 2013 Flood Summary .............................................................................................................14
Table2. Pump Controls...............................................................................................................................16
Table 3. Pump Station #2 Proposed Pump Controls.................................................................................... 21
Table 4. Alternative 1— At -Risk Structures Summary Table......................................................................... 21
Table 5. Pump Station #2 Drainage Area Improvement Alternatives—........................................................ 27
Table 6. Pump Station #1 Proposed Pump Controls.................................................................................... 27
Table 7. Alternative 5 — At -Risk Structures Summary Table......................................................................... 28
Table 8. Pump Station #1 Drainage Area Improvement Alternatives—........................................................ 31
Table 9. 25 -Year Improvement Alternative Proposed Outfall Flowrate Increases (No Tailwater).................. 32
Table 10. 25 -Year Improvement Alternative Results Summary (With Tailwater).......................................... 33
Table 11. 25 -Year Improvement Alternative Pump Capacity Increases......................................................... 33
Table 12.25 -Year Improvement Alternative Results Summary (With Tailwater).......................................... 34
Table 13. Summary of Pump Station Upgrades........................................................................................... 35
Table 14. Master Summary Table ................................................................................................................40
I IST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Study Area Location Map................................................................................................................ 8
Figure 2. 1963 USGS Hydrologic Atlas...........................................................................................................
9
Figure 3. 10 -Year Storm with FEMA FIS 10 -Year DPR Tailwater Prior to Levee 37 Construction ...................
11
Figure 4. Pump Station Drainage Areas.......................................................................................................12
Figure 5. Pump Station #2 Storm Sewer Schematic.....................................................................................15
Figure 6. Pump Station #2 Drainage Area At -Risk Structures.......................................................................18
Figure 7. Pump Station #1 Drainage Area At -Risk Structures.......................................................................19
Figure 8. Alternative 2 Schematic................................................................................................................
23
Figure 9. Alternative 4 Schematic................................................................................................................
26
Figure 10. Alternative 7 Schematic..............................................................................................................
30
Figure 11. 100 -Year DPR Hydrograph at Pump Station #2...........................................................................
37
Christopher 13. BUrke Engineering, Ltd.
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
mull
LIST OF EXHIBITS
1) Study Area Subbasin &Storm Sewer Map
2) April 2013 Storm Inundation Map With USGS Gage Tailwater &Pumps
3) April 2013 Storm Inundation Map Without Tailwater &Pumps
4) 100 -YR 2 -HR Storm Inundation Map Without Tailwater &Pumps
5) 10 -YR 2 -HR Storm Inundation Map Without Tailwater &Pumps
6) 10 -YR 2 -HR Storm Inundation Map With 10 -YR FIS Tailwater &Pumps
7) Alternative 1—Pump Station #2 Upgrade
8) Alternative 3—Pump Station #2 Upgrade &Proposed Upstream Storage
9) Alternative 5 —Pump Station #1 Upgrade
10) Alternative 6 -Pump Station #1 Upgrade &Proposed Upstream Storage
11) 25 -Year Storm Inundation Map Without Tailwater &Pumps
12) 25 -Year Storm Inundation Map With 10 -Year FIS Tailwater &Pumps
13) Alternative 8 — 25 -Year Storm Sewer Improvement With 10 -Year FIS Tailwater &Upgraded
Pump Stations
14) Alternative 9 — 25 -Year Storm Sewer &Flood Storage Improvement With 10 -Year FIS Tailwater
& Upgraded Pump Stations
APPENDICES
1) Cost Estimate
Christopher B. BUrka Engineering, Ltd.
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Lull
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Levee 37 Tributary Area Drainage Study was initiated by the Village of Mount Prospect
(Village) following the April 17-18, 2013 storm event to address residential flooding in areas
protected from Des Plaines River (DPR) overbank flooding by the Levee 37 floodwall. The Levee
37 project was designed by the US Army Corps of Engineers -Chicago District (USACOE) to prevent
DPR floodwater from entering Village residential areas and City of Prospect Heights areas west of
River Road. The Levee 37 project consists of several integrated components including a concrete -
capped floodwall, earthen levees, road raising, and internal drainage pump stations.
The majority of the April 2013 storm event rainfall occurred while the DPR water level was rising
but prior to it reaching its peak elevation. The rising DPR water level reduced and ultimately
prevented outflow from the Village's gravity storm sewers to the DPR. Once the DPR reached an
elevation that prevented outflow, the Village's stormwater could only be evacuated by the two
(2) Levee 37 pump stations; Pump Stations #1 and #2. These pump stations were constructed
concurrently with Levee 37 and were designed to drain residual stormwater in the storm sewer
system when the DPR water level was high. According to the USACOE, the pumps were not
designed to have capacity that equals the existing capacity of the sewer system with free -outfall
conditions (when the DPR is at normal elevation). As reported by Village staff, the limited capacity
of the pump stations initially resulted in street inundation in low areas, followed by yard flooding
and overtopping of sidewalks allowing floodwaters to enter below -grade garages, and also
basement seepage during the April 2013 storm event.
The Village retained Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) to perform a conceptual level
feasibility study that included:
• An analysis of the Village's storm sewer system and the Levee 37 pump stations to
identify the condition that lead to the flooding that occurred during the April 2013 storm
event.
• Determine the existing level of protection provided by the storm sewer system with the
levee and the pump stations in place for the residential area.
• Develop and analyze potential improvement alternatives to raise the level of protection
by increasing the pumping rate and through other improvements.
The study determined that the Village's storm sewer system has approximately a 10 -year storm
event capacity with a free -outflow condition (DPR is low). The study also confirmed Village staff's
opinion that the capacity of the existing storm sewer system was degraded during the April 2013
storm event because of the rising DPR water level and the inability of the two (2) Levee 37 pump
stations to provide sufficient capacity to discharge Village stormwater at a rate necessary to
prevent flooding in the residential area.
Prior to the development of the existing residential subdivision within the study area, the land
drained overland directly to the DPR. Once developed and prior to the construction of Levee 37,
during periods when the residential subdivision's storm sewers surcharge ponding would initially
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
2
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
occur within low-lying areas until flooding levels filled the streets and stormwater would flow
overland down the streets until crossing River Road and into the DPR. Levee 37 blocks overland
flow from reaching the DPR. Currently, the Levee 37 pump stations are the only means to convey
the overland flow to the DPR. Therefore, to alleviate flooding within the interior of the levee when
the DPR is high, the Levee 37 pump stations would need to be upgraded to replicate the historic
overland flow to the DPR.
In order to determine an "allowable" pumping rate for the system to replicate historic overland
flow values, a few factors were considered:
• First, the existing combined pumping rate of all three pumping stations (Pumping Stations
#11? #2, and #3) is approximately 60 cfs.
• A rising DPR degrades the ability of the storm sewers to discharge stormwater.
• Levee 37 protects the interior residential area from overbank flooding for DPR flooding
events at or greater than the 10 -year event.
• The capacity of the interior area's storm sewer system under low flow DPR conditions is
approximately the 10 -year event.
• Prior to the Levee 37 construction, events at and greater than the 10 -year flood along the
DPR would begin to flood the interior area, accessing floodplain storage that the levee
now blocks. However, the interior area had an unobstructed overland flow path to the
DPR.
• Hydraulic modeling determined that prior to the construction of the levee the overland
flow (generated by the 10 -year interior event) reaching the DPR was 240 cfs when the
DPR water level is at its 10 -year flood level.
Considering these hydraulic conditions, the DPR was always subject to receiving the overland flow
from the interior area for up to the 10 -year event without the benefit of significant overbank
floodplain storage. The construction of Levee 37 blocked this overland flow capacity, but the
pumps constructed as part of the levee project did not maintain this flow capacity, reducing the
overland flow discharge capacity (via pumping) to only 60 cfs, significantly lower than the pre -
levee condition of 240 cfs as described above. This means that the pumping rate can be increased
by 180 cfs and still maintain the pre -Levee 37 condition. An operating rule would need to be
established for events greater than the 10 -year flood to maintain pre -levee downstream
conditions.
CBBEL developed nine (9) improvement alternatives to modify the interior drainage system to
achieve the allowable pre -Levee 37 overland flow. All nine (9) improvement alternatives provide
increased pumping capacity at one of the Levee 37 project pump stations that serve the Village.
The increased pumping capacity would be achieved by constructing a new pump station adjacent
to the existing pump station. This would allow the existing pump station to continue operating
during the construction process. A few of the improvement alternatives also evaluated the use
of flood storage to reduce the required pumping capacity. Some improvement alternatives
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
3
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
evaluated storm sewer improvements to increase the efficiency of stormwater flow conveyance
to the Levee 37 project pump stations.
A 25 -year level -of -protection alternative (Alternative 9) was also developed and evaluated to
determine how this level can be achieved. This was done at the request of the Village to be
consistent with the Board directive to achieve, where possible, the 25 -year level of protection on
all new projects. The total pump capacity will be limited to 240 cfs. Two proposed stormwater
facilities, providing 18 and 12 acre-feet, are necessary to reduce the flow to the pump stations.
Diversion sewers are required to divert stormwater from adjacent main sewer lines.
Floodproofing will be necessary for two at -risk homes. The opinion of probable construction cost
for the 25 -year level of protection without off-site mitigation is $7.5 million based on 2015 unit
costs.
Based on the results of this conceptual feasibility study, CBBEL is recommending two (2)
improvements (Alternatives 3 and 6) that provide the 10 -year level of protection. These
alternatives increase the total pumping rate to 205 cfs, which is lower than the 240 cfs mentioned
above. This is due to the addition of stormwater storage within the two school properties that
provide a reduction in the flowrate reaching the pumping stations. However, the Village can
modify these alternatives to achieve the 240 cfs rate. The Village staff has indicated they will be
approaching the USACOE about funding the proposed pump station improvements. The opinion
of probable construction cost for recommended Alternatives 3 and 6 are $3.6 million and $2.1
million, respectively, based on a 2015 cost estimate.
The following is brief description of the recommended alternatives for a 10 -year level of
protection:
Altnrnnthin I
• Construct new pump station adjacent to Levee 37 Pump Station #2 with pumping capacity
of 105 cfs.
• Proposed 11.6 acre-foot stormwater storage basin located within an existing open space
at Robert Frost Elementary School property.
Altnrnnthin A
• Construct new pump station adjacent to Levee 37 Pump Station #1 with pumping capacity
of 40 cfs.
• Proposed 7.0 acre-foot stormwater storage basin located within an existing open space
at the Indian Grove Elementary School property.
3 hfistopher B_ Burke Engineerinq, Ltd.
4
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
The Des Plaines River (DPR) is the largest natural waterway in Cook County and has produced
multiple historic flood events in the adjacent communities. The residential subdivision in the
northeast portion of the Village of Mount Prospect (Village) along the DPR is one area that has
been historically impacted by riverine flooding (Figure 1 below). To reduce the risk of riverine
flooding along the DPR, the United States Army Corps of Engineers -Chicago District (USACOE)
received congressional approval and funding in 1999 to design and construct six features for flood
control in the Upper DPR Watershed. One of those projects was Levee 37.
The design for Levee 37 was developed by the USACOE in conjunction with the Illinois Department
of Transportation (IDOT), Cook County Forest Preserve District (CCFPD) and the Illinois
Department of Natural Resources — Office of Water Resources (IDNR-OWR). The Levee 37 project
consists of approximately 9,000 linear feet of floodwall including a small portion of earthen levee,
three interior drainage pumping stations, a number of gravity outlet structures, a roadway closure
structure and a road raise. The Levee 37 project was constructed by the USACOE to prevent DPR
floodwaters from reaching residential and commercial properties west of River Road in the Village
and the City of Prospect Heights (City). The floodwall runs along the east side of River Road from
just north of Euclid Avenue to Milwaukee Avenue, continues along the east side of Milwaukee
Avenue from River Road to Palatine Road Expressway, and then west along the north side of the
Palatine Road Expressway to high ground. Levee 37 project also included the raising of Milwaukee
Avenue by IDOT to complete the line of flood protection.
The entire protected side of the floodwall consists of both Village and City residential and
commercial development with two (2) schools and park district property. Three (3) Levee 37
pump stations are used to evacuate interior stormwater from these areas when the DPR water
levels restrict the gravity discharge of the storm sewer system. During this condition, Tideflex
check valves close to prevent DPR water from inundating interior properties through the storm
sewer system. Village Staff indicated that back-flow through the storm sewers was the major
cause of the record flooding during DPR flood events in 1986 and 1987.
By displacing the floodwaters that inundated 64 acres of land in the Village, the Levee 37 project
would have resulted in an increased in DPR flood stages above the regulatory limit. However, the
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC) took the lead to design
and construct the Heritage Park Flood Control project in the Village of Wheeling to provide
mitigation to prevent stage increases along the DPR above the regulatory limit. The Heritage Park
Flood Control Project was completed at the end of 2013, which allowed for the completion of the
floodwall in November 2014 as the original floodwall was constructed with a gap that temporarily
prevented downstream impacts.
While Levee 37 does provide a great benefit for the Village study area from DPR overbank
flooding, it cuts off an existing overland flow route for internal drainage to the DPR. The overland
flow route can be seen on the 1963 USGS Hydrologic Atlas on Figure 2. The overland flow route
consisted of two small tributaries that flowed east and converge prior to overtopping River Road
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
5
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
and flowing to the DPR. Prior to Levee 37, if a storm event took place while the DPR stage
restricted or eliminated outflow from the storm sewers, low lying depressions in the study area
would fill and ultimately ponding water would be conveyed overland to the DPR. For the same
condition with the Levee 37 floodwall in place, that overland flow route to the DPR is cutoff and
all stormwater generated in the study area must be pump evacuated into the DPR.
The Levee 37 project, including the floodwall, earthen berm, closure structures and the three (3)
pump stations, was constructed in 2011. Pump Stations #11 #2, and #3 are located along the
south, middle, and north portion of the floodwall, respectively. Pump Station #1 drains
stormwater exclusively from the Village, while Pump Station #2 drains areas of both the Village
and the City, and Pump Station #3 drains water exclusively from the City.
During the April 17-18, 2013 storm event, Village and City Staff temporary blocked the floodwall
gap with Jersey Barriers preventing DPR floodwaters from reaching the interior areas. The Levee
37 Pump Stations #1 and #2 were functioning during this storm event along with portable pumps
operated by Village Public Works personnel. According to Village Staff the Levee 37 Pump Stations
did not have sufficient capacity to prevent street inundation in low areas, yard flooding and
overtopping of sidewalks allowing floodwaters to enter below -grade garages during the April
2013 storm event.
The Village retained Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) to perform a conceptual level
feasibility study that included:
• Determine the pre -Levee 37 floodwall overland flow rate to the DPR assuming a 10 -year
storm event over the study area and the DPR at a 10 -year flood elevation.
• An analysis of the Village's storm sewer system and the Levee 37 pump stations to
identify any conditions that lead to the flooding that occurred during the April 2013 storm
event.
• Determine the existing level of protection for the residential area.
• Develop and analyze potential improvement alternatives to raise the level of protection
when the pump stations are operating.
During a July 28, 2015 meeting, USACOE personnel indicated that the design of the Levee 37 Pump
Stations was based on non -coincident peaks between the DPR and the interior storm sewer
system. Their analysis was based on rainfall data and DPR levels recorded prior to 1990. As a
consequence, the Levee 37 Pump Stations were designed to primarily rely on gravity discharge to
dewater the storm sewer system. The objectives of the conceptual level Levee 37 drainage study
are as follows:
• Identify any conditions in the drainage system that lead to the April 2013 flooding.
• Identify the capacity of the existing storm sewer system under both free-flow (no
tailwater) conditions and pumped flow (with tailwater) conditions.
3 hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
0
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
• Develop improvement concepts to increase the capacity of the drainage system when
DPR tailwater is present.
• Analyze the effect of the proposed improvement projects on the hydraulics of the DPR.
• Recommend improvement alternatives to the Village Board.
91"3, ChriStopher B- 6tirke Engy-neei-ing, Lfd
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study
"u19P'
lw
MAI
17
+mw•
p(
a - .
�WO ",CITY OF PROSPECT- HEIGHTS
__�-,ILL�AE F'MUN:
:� T P Flo S P EST•
.. � �� r.:rte ,'" � T•:: LU
_
L^ rµ �P
September 22, 2015
nd
' ," — • " . •^ ` : tir ., . fir{, : _f • • u ' �
L
. .. a � .�'� a ` � . •
PIP,"
r
d
"' r . A,. �::y •. a
A •: „• , � "° ".
��. v � 1 o„�._ . • .s ��, H V '.'
„ f u• r✓...
"_ � rt, � a m „ ie F °. �;.. x,•,' w ..'�� ,dim` • � „�
d
� "
r
a
,T
. r »",_ �:� _,.
r
y . �
r
kyr
• r
AMP MCDONALD ROAD",
rr
•
Q.)
e
� d'W 1`• r
r ,_ _
r
s
•n�
I"
m
nd
' ," — • " . •^ ` : tir ., . fir{, : _f • • u ' �
L
. .. a � .�'� a ` � . •
e
.
"' r . A,. �::y •. a
A •: „• , � "° ".
��. v � 1 o„�._ . • .s ��, H V '.'
„ f u• r✓...
"_ � rt, � a m „ ie F °. �;.. x,•,' w ..'�� ,dim` • � „�
d
v
,T
. r »",_ �:� _,.
r,
- ..., uH ,• .
kyr
• r
AMP MCDONALD ROAD",
•
r
„�gyp_ r ;}�v
•,�' . tip. ,." . r'
r
s
r
I"
m
••
,• " eie _ �• . ,&, . . a '• :r . .+ �
�. "
r" :: a "• r r� '}
' n •
} .: .^L ... A u err
D. 'Y/A. L E i
r r
..•
'fir „
r
� F•�
a
•.
u
e
r •
� F
r Y r«
n f• r ••••Y ,ti � r " �
f
^ n ��
d• f ^�
16 IF
61,
kw �'" '��' ��'- •
i � '� .._�.a
0
.: " III � _:. ,. ~W_ r Yr!-. +r J•
T
., �
�� 'Ny
' eeni
."• •_� .. ., � �, •F�� u��n '_ ..r � °Y"r.'r•
, �um •"�� � � •� �� �.�''1 � �... �..•P Y��.r - -.e' . � � }
s.
t _
—m 616
r
.r
' n
, � ., _ GYM 4^ � k
^ •• � •�'�. " • � � .
�
s, _��yy� � .�. � • _ o "'° i „qua,+-� � .., � r � .
. "1'u' • r Y m „ a a" •
�
i
fi
s o• : �, .. a r ti.
L"' .:
•u �a
�,
• • "+''fir —�. s �,.
� ... r
Figure 1. Study Area Location Map
}
3 hristop h r B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.
0
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Figure 2. 1963 USGS Hydrologic Atlas
RIM3 hriStopher B- Burke Engineering, Ltd.
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
CHAPTER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
To analyze the existing stormwater drainage system behind Levee 37, CBBEL developed an
XPSWMM model for the drainage areas to Pump Stations #1, #2, and #3. Pump Stations #1 and
#2 are located in the Village while Pump Station #3 is located in the City. It was necessary to
model Pump Station #3 and its tributary area because when this system surcharges, overland flow
is conveyed south into the Pump Station #2 Watershed.
The study area was analyzed using XPSWMM computer software, which is a proprietary program
based on the US Environmental Protection Agency's Storm Water Management Model (SWMM).
XPSWMM is a dynamic hydrologic and hydraulic modeling program that is well-suited for
analyzing urban stormwater management systems. XPSWMM simulates rainfall -runoff responses
for user specified storm events (hydrologic component) and analyzes the performance of the
stormwater management system (hydraulic component).
2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS DESCRIPTION
The general drainage pattern for the study area is from west to east, with multiple gravity flow
outlets and pump discharges draining to the DPR. Prior to the development of the existing
residential subdivision within the study area, the land drained naturally overland directly to the
DPR as shown on the 1963 USGS Hydrologic Atlas on Figure 2 (above). When the residential
subdivision's storm sewers surcharge, ponding would initially occur within low-lying areas until
flooding levels filled the street and stormwater runoff was designed to flow overland down the
streets until crossing River Road and into the DPR. This overland flow path reduced the risk of
homes flooding when street flooding occurred. The construction of the Levee 37 floodwall
blocked this overland flow capacity, but the pumps constructed as part of the Levee did not
maintain this flow capacity. An XPSWMM simulation was performed for pre -Levee 37 conditions
to analyze the amount of overland flow to the DPR for a 10 -year storm in the study area while the
DPR is at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Study (FIS) 10 -year
flood elevation. As shown on Figure 3, the maximum overland flowrate over River Road to the
DPR is approximately 240 cfs. The existing pump stations have a combined capacity of 60 cfs.
Currently, the Levee 37 pump stations are the only means to convey the overland flow to the DPR.
This means that the Village could increase the pumping capacity up to this flow rate with any
future enhancements to the pump stations.
Main trunk storm sewer lines to the Levee 37 Pump Stations were identified, surveyed, and
entered into the XPSWMM model. The Levee 37 Pump Stations controls (on/off elevations) were
identified in the USACOE Levee 37 Engineering Plans and the manufacturer pump curves were
input into XPSWMM to define the relationship between flowrate and head. As the head
decreases the pump flow increases with a maximum pumping rate of 8.5 cfs for a single pump.
Pump Stations #1 and #3 each have two (2) pumps with total capacity of 17 cfs. Pump Station #2
houses three (3) pumps with a total capacity of 25.5 cfs. All pumps are identical in capacity. The
pump controls indicate that the pumps are only activated when the DPR water level has already
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
10
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
limited flow from the storm sewer outfalls. Figure 4 shows the drainage area to the three (3)
Levee 37 Pump Stations.
s ,
. qR4
' - SEAPNOjLE LAME �
y
fir
�• a "� "
'N
�r
jr e
191"
e
'.•.jr7�ud• ro
ay I s
F
AXIMUtA ��O E�RLAND FLOWA F IVER ROAD TO T-iE DDR _ 240 CFS
2
e �
LU N;,li
s,.
W
WOOD VEW DRIVE
1
t -
F40„
4
1., 61100100"
LEGEND <
�w
�r
T
.. � - � '••.n . ' �� .' � �, �e 'q her ` � ., n
q
T P
y
q ^ w
DIFF-'T10ra ^
1 G R 2 H R STORM WITH TAILWATER
n .
FU) 0D DEPTH (FT)
0-1
1 _2 9
2-3
3-4
Aa.
4-5
5-6
16-7 �e
7-s �w
}Cry NO� J T douR
"
u
Figure 3. 10 -Year Storm with FEMA FIS 10 -Year DPR Tailwater Prior to Levee 37 Construction
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
11
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study
September 22, 2015
RAM
P'
�.��. TIO ##
o K �
D I AI I A E °A I EAI° '- 7 A I E
1
AftiRL t.
I�
y
,R� .minummm�i,.
R
SEMIN SLE LANE
7-
All.
:23L LANE Uj
ku PUMP STATION
DRAINAGE Al EA = 463 ACRES
�ywi 00%
0r4r:joA,L-A'NE CD YUMA LA
� ll 7
°.
Uj
NE z
k,
MP STATION #1
DRAINAGE E A IAEA =-275 A I E .
ON OAK
WWI
J:.
Sl --E UCL IDA VElVJ&
�J-
f
�■�■� _
I
L EIVY LA tVE
,,A
ILU
WD40-n 1 A{
a�WA LANE
_
AREA SOUTH OF DASHED LINE IS TRIEIJT-AR " TO EUCLID �
�
AVENUE STORM S E'YVE �, DURING LARGE EVENTS THESEWER
SURCHARGES AND FLOWS OVERLAND TO EUPAP STATION #1 `'-
r
Figure 4. Pump Station Drainage Areas
Christopher R. Burke Engine-eifrog, Ltd.
12
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
The drainage area for the entire study area was broken down into smaller subbasins. One
hundred (100) subbasins were delineated using the Cook County 1 -foot aerial topography. The
average area for the subbasins is approximately eight (8) acres. The hydrologic parameters that
define each subbasin were determined based on methodology outlined in TR -55: Urban
Hydrology forSmall Watersheds (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1986). In the XPSWMM model,
the following information was input for each subbasin:
• Drainage Area
• Runoff Curve Number (RCN)
• Time of Concentration (Tc)
The RCN was defined based on the land use using current aerial photography (2014) for each of
the subbasins. The RCN value calculated for each subbasin is based on the ratio of impervious to
pervious area in each subbasin. The Tc is a calculation of the longest time it takes a drop of water
to reach the outlet of the subbasin. A hydrologic map with subbasin delineations and hydrologic
parameters is included as Exhibit 1.
The hydraulic elements of the model, including storm sewer diameters, lengths, materials, slopes,
etc., were obtained from a CBBEL field survey. In addition to the major systems of the storm
sewer network, overland flow and low lying storage were modeled. If a storm sewer does not
have sufficient capacity to convey the tributary runoff, the system surcharges resulting in street
inundation and overland flow. To effectively analyze the interaction between the storm sewer
system and overland flow, XPSWMM 2D hydraulic surface modeling was utilized. The hydrology
and subsurface hydraulics are analyzed using the standard 1D methods while the catch basins act
as the connection between the 1D and 2D surface interface. The surface is modeled using a Digital
Terrain Model (DTM) created from Cook County Lidar data. When storm sewers exceed capacity,
the excess stormwater enters the 2D model surface and flood water flows naturally based on
topography, as determined by the DTM. This method provides a more accurate analysis of flood
depths and limits along overland flow routes, and accounts for storage in low lying areas, as well
as providing a comprehensive graphic representation of the flooding.
2.2 MODEL CALIBRATION Ai M
The primary reason that the Village initiated the flood study was the significant flooding that
occurred during the April 2013 storm event in the residential subdivisions west of the Levee 37
floodwall. For this reason, the April 2013 storm was selected for model calibration and also
because it is the largest storm that has occurred since the Levee 37 project was constructed.
Approximately 5.5 inches of the rainfall fell over a 24 hour period beginning at 9:00 AM on April
17th. The rainfall data for the April 2013 storm was obtained from the Illinois State Water Survey
(ISWS) gage in the City of Des Plaines near Oakton Street. A gap in the floodwall near Pump
Station #2 still existed during this storm event, but Village and City Staff undertook emergency
B0hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
3
13
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
measures and used Jersey Barriers to temporary close the gap and multiple portable pumps were
brought in to help drain water at Pump Station #2. Village Staff indicated that residential and
street flooding occurred along Park Drive in both the Pump Station #1 and #2 tributary areas as
well as significant flooding along River Road near Seminole Lane.
Based on the XPSWMM model results, the peak flooding (west of the Levee 37 floodwall) occurred
between 4:00 AM and 11:00 AM on April 18th. A summary of the simulated maximum flood
depths for the storm is provided in Table 1, and a flood inundation map is shown on Exhibit 2.
Table 1. April 2013 Flood Summary
.
Rim
Ell
-
Maximum Maximum
..Inundation
Elevation(FT)
Depth
North Park Drive
Intersection of Park Drive & 635.2
Woodview Drive
636.7 1.5
South Park Drive
240 feet north of intersection 636.2
of Park Drive & Ta no Ln
637.7 1.5
River Road
Adjacent to Pump Station #2 634.3
636.5 2.2
The Village provided CBBEL with a sketch of measured water elevations near the intersection of
Seminole Lane and River Road. The elevations on the sketch were measured between 9:00 AM
and 3:30 PM on April 19th around the time the DPR reached its maximum stage. The XPSWMM
model results show water elevations approximately 1 -foot higher than the measured water
elevations at this time. The lower, measured water elevation may be attributed to the additional
portable pumps that were brought in to help drain the floodwater. These temporary pumps were
not accounted for in the XPSWMM model.
2.3 PUMP ANALYSIS
During the April 2013 event, the XPSWMM modeling shows the existing Levee 37 Pump Stations
#1 and #2 pumps were not able to keep up with the inflow from the storm sewer system which
was confirmed by eyewitness accounts of Village Staff. As previously mentioned, the maximum
pumping capacity of a single pump is 8.5 cfs based on the manufacturer pump curves. Pump
Station #1 contains two (2) pumps and drains stormwater from a 60 -inch trunk sewer with an
invert elevation of 627.75 feet. Farther upstream, Pump Station #2 contains three (3) pumps that
drain two large trunk storm sewers when the DPR is high: A 5.25 -foot by 4 -foot reinforced
concrete box culvert (RCBC) to the north and a 5.5 -foot by 4.5 -foot RCBC to the south. Both trunk
storm sewer lines have separate gravity outfalls to the DPR. All gravity storm sewer outfalls to
the DPR drain through closure structures that have manually operated sluice gates that can be
lowered in the event the Tideflex backflow preventer fails. Both trunk storm sewers are
connected to the Pump Station by 30 -inch diversion sewers that convey flow to the Pump Station
well. Figure 5 provides an illustration of the storm sewer configuration upstream of Pump Station
#2, and Table 2 provides pump control information for all three (3) pump stations.
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
14
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Figure 5. Pump Station #2 Storm Sewer Schematic
91"3, hriStopher R. Burke Engineering, Ltd.
15
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
u
Table 2. Pump Controls
Pump Station
ID
Sump
Elevation
Pump ID
Sta rt
Elevation
__19
Stop Elevation
Max Pumping
Rate (CFS)
#1
627.5
SWP-1
8.5
631.75
629.75
SWP-2
8.5
634.00
631.00
#2
628.0
SWP-1
8.5
631.25
630.00
SWP-2
8.5
632.25
630.50
SWP-3
8.5
633.25
631.25
#3
629.08
SWP-1
8.5
633.00
631.50
SWP-2
8.5
635.00
632.50
2.4 SYSTEM CAPACITY
II 0
�I
To analyze the storm sewer system capacity, CBBEL evaluated the effect of the April 2013 rainfall
in the study area assuming that the storm sewer gravity outlets where not limited by the DPR
stage and no Levee 37 pump stations were functioning. Exhibit 3 depicts the results of this
simulation. The model results indicate that during the April 2013 storm some street flooding
would have still occurred, but the extent and depth of flooding would be greatly reduced when
compared to the levels that occured with actual DPR water level elevation and pumping scenario
that occurred. This confirms the Village Staff's observation that the Levee 37 project pump
station's capacities are not sufficient to maintain the existing storm sewer gravity flow capacity
when the DPR water level elevation has an influence. Excess stormwater runoff that could not
enter the storm sewer system was conveyed overland down the streets to River Road where it
ponded because Levee 37 blocked the overland flow path. A storm inundation map for the April
2013 event with no tailwater (DPR at non -flood levels and pumps not operating) is provided in
Exhibit 3.
To further analyze the storm sewer system, design storms were modeled with free-flow gravity
outlet conditions (DPR at normal pool). First, a critical duration analysis was performed and it was
determined that the 2 -hour storm produced the maximum flows and flood stages within the study
area. Model results from the 100 -year, 2 -hour storm event indicate significant flooding along
both north and south Park Avenue as well as other low-lying areas in the study area. A storm
inundation map for the 100 -year, 2 -hour storm is provided in Exhibit 4.
To better define the existing sewer system capacity, 2 -hour critical duration storms with 2-, 5-,
10-, 25-, and 50 -year recurrence intervals were simulated with the model. Based on the model
results, the existing storm sewer system has approximately a 10 -year storm event capacity,
though some surcharging occurs. The 10 -year, 2 -hour storm inundation map, shown on Exhibit
5, demonstrates the storm sewer system is generally capable of handling the runoff from this
storm with the exception of some areas where street flooding occurs. Based on the Cook County
Lidar DTM, this street flooding appears to not impact building structures (this study is focused on
Village areas, so unless otherwise specified, it does not apply to City areas).
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
16
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Exhibit 6 shows the same 10 -year, 2 -hour storm but with a tailwater equal to the FEMA FIS 10 -
year DPR flood elevation. Overland flow of stormwater runoff that cannot enter the storm sewer
system flows down the streets to River Road where the Levee 37 Floodwall blocks its path to the
DPR. The overland flow path is shown by arrows in Figure 6. This scenario does not allow for any
gravity storm sewer outflow, forcing all stormwater behind the Levee 37 floodwall to be pumped.
When pumps are activated because gravity outfalls can no longer drain, floodwater ponds in the
low lying areas along roads just west of the Levee 37 floodwall. The most significant flooding is
in the Pump Station #2 drainage area as shown in Figure 6. When stormwater cannot drain
through the gravity outfalls adjacent to Pump Station #2, the pumps are unable to keep up with
the inflow, surcharging the sewer system and filling the low-lying areas on and around Park Drive.
Two main low lying areas that result in the deepest flooding are located at Park Drive and Seneca
Lane (2.3 feet) and Park Drive and Woodview Drive (1.9 feet).
The Village provided CBBEL with GIS data identifying homes with reverse slope driveways and
homes that reported flooding following the April 2013 storm event. This information was used in
conjunction with the inundation map for the 10 -year storm event with FEMA FIS 10 -year DPR
flood elevation to identify residential structures with the highest potential for flooding. In total,
forty-four (44) residential structures were surveyed for low overtop elevations or low entry
elevations. These elevations were then compared with results from the existing conditions
XPSWMM model to identify homes at risk of flooding for a design storm event. The 1-, 2-, 5-, and
10 -year existing conditions design storms were simulated with XPSWMM with the FEMA FIS 10 -
year tailwater, which results in eliminating flow from gravity sewers. Model results indicate there
is no significant flooding for the 1 -year event. In total, Figure 6 shows nine (9) structures at risk
of flooding during the 2 -year event, 13 (thirteen) structures at -risk during the 5 -year event, and
19 (nineteen) structures at -risk during the 10 -year event in the Pump Station #2 drainage area.
Please note that if a structure floods for the 2 -year event, it will also flood for all larger events.
Additionally, significant street flooding occurs on both River Road and Seminole Lane for the 2 -
year event and greater.
3 hfistopher B_ Burke Engineerinq, Ltd.
17
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study
September 22, 2015
SEMINOLE LANE 1511, 15"
7`5
1
A _
s
il. Plow
,.
u x W n !
11% jL
.' -..�� .—" °Jr � —'�1LL h ;�° � � `mar— 9 Y 5•�0 � !� q� R°•'�'" m � J"
1
p�
"
!
��Y � � NV M• � n � � � y
' d,µ
tl
� EIJMD STATION ##'_'Ir
_ 6w„
ISS +°OD� L)i�IY V
�' + ��` {� ��10 v
1°
r 4
• `"eo *Ilk
�
° "
WAYA LJ R 4 r'
VT
_ — r- .01
i
or
41,
Ai
dr
I Of
u
,
F.
T 9
--!
APa
rL 0'P
r -410
*" i!
I— I
Arm
. "
3. k mii
a
T
y ° � I NOS' ,i l J� µ doup
kr
Agw
I
4%, � —CA d - _ I
WW 74
P- G• ... ti
t
NINE
..
I_ � YEAR K"3}
- 2 '{EAP, (!D)
I CYR 2 H R STORM WITH TAI LWAT E R
Figure 6. Pump Station #2 Drainage Area At -Risk Structures
Flooding also occurs in low-lying areas along and around Park Drive in the Pump Station #1
drainage area. Figure 7 shows at risk of flooding structures for the 2-, 5- and 10 -year storm event
as one (1), three (3) and four (4), respectively in the Pump Station #1 drainage area.
3 hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
18
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study
September 22, 2015
W .
lip
FPM
dGMi�� E.
4•
��.49
.. w
�4: .. a �,•m �,. � �� �,
.YY
w:
y i�� r_+_
ANN.
77
..� wt ^` � � � � i � s � F` —ter• �" R �, � .INS �"� ""` �"°�,
uY �
i^
_.,®.
I
.clsoll
r
70 �i
r
L _ ,—
If
. . .....
J ;2!
Nil
i w-
i
CO, .
Figure 7. Pump Station #1 Drainage Area At -Risk Structures
This analysis was performed using the Village's GIS data to identify potential at -risk structures in
low-lying areas and may not include all structures potentially at risk of flooding. Additional survey
is recommended in the future studies to identify elevations for all structures adjacent to the low-
lying areas. The additional survey will also help to completely understand the benefits provided
by the improvement alternatives discussed in Chapter 3.
hfistopher B. Berke E-ingineering, Ltd.
19
LEGEND
w p
FLOOD EVENT
AT—RISK HOMES
1 &Yr4
1 0Y R 2 FIS STORM WITH TAS LW#TER
FLOOD DEPTH
'AY
...e , n
2-
P�� M TATgON #
:3 -
YID
4 -
w
,
0+]-��•
�.
�
0 -
.
1'C ,�.
7-8
>3
.I
Figure 7. Pump Station #1 Drainage Area At -Risk Structures
This analysis was performed using the Village's GIS data to identify potential at -risk structures in
low-lying areas and may not include all structures potentially at risk of flooding. Additional survey
is recommended in the future studies to identify elevations for all structures adjacent to the low-
lying areas. The additional survey will also help to completely understand the benefits provided
by the improvement alternatives discussed in Chapter 3.
hfistopher B. Berke E-ingineering, Ltd.
19
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
CHAPTER 3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS
The existing conditions XPSWMM modeling analysis indicates that the storm sewer system in the
study area has approximately 10 -year storm event capacity under free -outfall (no tailwater)
conditions. However, this level of service isnot achievable when the gravity outfalls are impacted
by the DPR water level elevation. When the storm sewer system has to rely on the Levee 37
project pump stations to evacuate the 10 -year storm event flows, significant flooding results in
low-lying areas in the study area. Conceptual level improvement alternatives were developed to
improve the level of protection when the DPR stage reduces the gravity storm sewer outflow
while maintaining the maximum allowable pumping rate of 240 cfs from the study area. Since
the three (3) existing Levee 37 pump stations have a cumulative maximum capacity of 60 cfs,
this means 180 cfs of additional proposed pumping capacity is allowable. Improvement projects
analyzed include:
• Increasing pumping capacity at Pump Stations #1 and #2
• A new pump station for the City drainage
• Providing upstream flood storage with Pump Station #1 and #2 pumping capacity increase
to improve the level of protection
• Storm sewer improvements to improve conveyance in known flood prone areas
Alternative 1 consists of increasing the pumping capacity at Pump Station #2. Under current
conditions, Pump Station #2 can achieve a maximum pumping capacity of 25.5 cfs. The existing
10 -year storm event cumulative maximum flowrate from the gravity outfalls tributary to Pump
Station #2 is 274 cfs. Results from the modeling analysis indicate that in order to maintain the 10 -
year storm event flow capacity during conditions where the DPR water level elevation degrades
the gravity outflow, an additional 225 cfs of pumping capacity is required. Because only 180 cfs,
of cumulative additional pumping capacity is allowed (for both Pump Station #1 and #2), the
proposed additional rate for Alternative 1 at Pump Station #2 was calculated to be 120 cfs. To
obtain this additional pumping capacity, this alternative consists of constructing a new pump
station adjacent to the existing pump station to house three (3) new 40 cfs pumps. Section 3.9
of this report includes a discussion on the feasibility of upgrading the existing pump station. To
convey the additional flow to the pump station, two (2) 5 -foot by 5 -foot RCBCs are proposed to
replace the existing 30 -inch RCP diversion sewers that currently convey flow from the north and
south trunk storm sewers to Pump Station #2. The wet well for the proposed pump station would
be connected to the existing wet well so stormwater can be conveyed to both pump stations and
the pump controls can be modified to utilize all six (6) pumps. The modeling analysis also shows
that the existing start control elevations are set too high to start evacuating water before ponding
along North Park Drive begins. Therefore, this and all alternatives include modifying the controls
of existing pumps so that pumping begins earlier that it currently does. The proposed pump start
control elevations for both the existing and proposed pumps are provided in Table 3.
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
20
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Table 3. Pump Station #2 Proposed Pump Controls
Pump Station
ID
pump ID
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Existing Start Proposed Start
Elevation (ft) Elevation (ft)
Pump Station
Proposed Pump
Station
Exhibit 7 shows the configuration of Alternative 1 and the resulting 10 -year inundation map. This
alternative reduces the risk of flooding for a number of structures currently at -risk of flooding
during the 2-, 5-, and 10 -year storms. Table 4 provides the number of structures at -risk of flooding
for existing conditions and those removed from the inundation area with Alternative 1
improvements.
Table 4. Alternative 1— At -Risk Structures Summary Table
Alternative 1 is not recommended because it does not remove all 19 at -risk structures in the Pump
Station #2 drainage area from the 10 -year inundation area. This alternative does produce a
significant improvement of the level of protection during non -gravity sewer outflow conditions.
The estimated cost of Alternative 1 is $1.8 million.
As previously mentioned, a 48 -inch storm sewer conveys water across Seminole Lane from the
City to the Village and into the Village's storm sewer system on Park Drive just south of Seminole
Lane. This 48 -inch storm sewer combines with another trunk storm sewer along Seneca Lane and
then heads southeast towards Pump Station #2. Alternative 2 proposes to disconnect this 48 -inch
storm sewer from the Village's sewer system and provide a new gravity storm sewer outfall and
pump station to the DPR in the City. The proposed 48 -inch storm sewer configuration is shown
in Figure 8 starting at the Willow Woods Condominium detention ponds. A new pump station
with a 20 cfs capacity is required at this outfall to evacuate stormwater when the DPR is high.
The simulation results indicate that a new pump station would still be required at Pump Station
#2 to adequately evacuate stormwater from the Village's drainage area. The new pump station
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
21
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
adjacent to Pump Station #2 would be limited to a maximum pumping rate of 100 cfs provided in
three (3) 33 cfs pumps to meet the 120 cfs maximum allowable pumping rate for this pump
station's drainage area. The configuration of the proposed pump station is identical to Alternative
1, with the exception of the reduced pumping rate. The proposed start control elevations for the
existing and proposed pump stations are the same as Alternative 1 and are shown in Table 3. The
total cumulative maximum pumping rate from both proposed pump stations is 120 cfs, which is
equivalent to the maximum pumping rate provided in Alternative 1. Benefits provided in
Alternative 2 are nearly identical to the benefits provided by Alternative 1.
Alternative 2 is not recommended due to the higher cost of constructing two (2) separate pump
stations to pump the same 120 cfs flowrate. Figure 8 provides a schematic for the Alternative 2.
The estimated cost of Alternative 2 is $2.7 million.
hfistopher B- Burke Engineerinq, Ltd.
:3
22
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study
September 22, 2015
X
I iR
"
"
_ a
sal
IT
F
� flII
g
OF
431 1 R C4 OF'
I "
• � �.,s II
-w 41 RCP
. ,
A
a.�
I
1
I-
�
JI;
r
&EVINCOLE NE
y
Jim
1,04 rPROPO SE a PR 0 SPEC T HE IG HTS IPU MIP STATIC � -
S I N GL E PL'I I P - MAX PUM P ING RATE= 20 CFS � r
START EL E' .'ATI ON = 630
"
w n kyr
.. �.1 1 ,x f'Nm •ERT EL E'VATIO" , = m� 6%
. m
s ....y 1
0111
" � •y� 1.� �, � " "a w Jim'
A i
A a
mm
3 r �e��
• Ism '=7,•r �.. ..- ub � '�I'P n d�H
=
REPLACE timrr E'�4'E WITH FACE
�'�"� 1
F I�a�'REA ED cONVEYA��CE
ti
�
T O PROPOSED PUMP TATN��PllI .
� m
I
m r "
11�
I
— f r.
w
m . w
%0
Lw
1
00
1
w
I�
I
n ":
•
1
Figure 8. Alternative 2 Schematic
Christopher B. Burke Frig neei-ing, Ltd.
23
P It m. 5, atlol5 92
Pump la
111111 Pump, I ; • Extsb rig " tt rT P-Dpc _
• - _ _ .
Ame t•£fs'l Elevation ft FIey�1L-r.
F'*�R-
:'
yyyy
Figure 8. Alternative 2 Schematic
Christopher B. Burke Frig neei-ing, Ltd.
23
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
The purpose of Alternative 3 is to further refine Alternative 1 by providing stormwater storage in
an open space upstream of Pump Station #2 to increase the level of protection with the increase
in capacity for Pump Station #2. The proposed stormwater storage location is within an open
space at Robert Frost Elementary School property. This area was selected for stormwater storage
due to its location relative to adjacent trunk storm sewers that would allow a larger diversion of
storm flow, and the availability of open space.
Alternative 3 proposes to intercept flow from two (2) trunk sewers flowing west to east in the
Pump Station #2 drainage area. A proposed 48 -inch storm sewer will intercept flow from the 42 -
inch trunk storm sewer at the intersection of Aztec Lane and Oneida Lane, and convey it south to
the proposed excavated stormwater storage area. A 6 -inch diameter restrictor is proposed on
the existing trunk storm sewer to allow low flows to continue east and higher flows to be diverted
south to the proposed stormwater storage area. This improvement also conveys stormwater flow
from the intersection of Maya Lane and Oneida Lane, where a 48 -inch storm sewer combines with
a 27 -inch storm sewer, into the stormwater storage area through a proposed 60 -inch storm
sewer. A 12 -inch diameter restrictor on the Maya Lane trunk storm sewer allows water to back
up into the stormwater storage area and drain by gravity (no pump station) following the storm
event. It was found that approximately 11.8 acre-feet of storage volume could be achieved within
the shown footprint on Exhibit 8.
The Alternative 3 improvements reduce the flowrates on the Aztec and Seneca Lane trunk storm
sewer from about 46 cfs to 1 cfs, and on the Maya Lane trunk storm sewer from about 49 cfs to 7
cfs. Although flows to Pump Station #2 are greatly reduced with the proposed stormwater
storage, additional pumping capacity is still required to reduce the flooding within the low-lying
areas. The pump controls and configuration are the same as Alternative 1, with the exception of
a reduced pumping rate. The proposed pump station requires a maximum pumping rate of 105
cfs which is provided by three (3) 35 cfs pumps (Alternative 1 pump rate is 120 cfs). Only 105 cfs
of pumping capacity is required to eliminate the risk of flooding for homes up to the 10 -year storm
event. Alternative 3 reduces the flood depth at Park Drive and Seneca Lane from 2.3 feet to 0.6
feet, and eliminates ponding at Park Drive and Woodview Drive for a 10 -year storm event. All
homes at -risk of flooding during the 2-, 5-, and 10 -year storm events are removed from the
existing inundation area with this improvement. Exhibit 8 shows the conceptual layout for
Alternative 3 and the resulting inundation map.
Currently, the proposed excavated stormwater storage for Alternative 3 is shown in the southern
portion of open space within the school property. The location of the stormwater storage area
can be adjusted to accommodate the needs of the Robert Frost Elementary School and the Village.
Another viable, but more costly option, would be to provide the stormwater storage in an
underground vault and restore the open space to its current condition.
Alternative 3 is recommended because it provides the best flood reduction benefit of all the Pump
Station #2 alternatives, removing all at -risk homes from the 10 -year inundation area.
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
24
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
The estimated cost of Alternative 3 is $3.6 million.
Alternative 4 is identical to Alternative 1 except that Alternative 4 includes storm sewer
improvements along Park Drive and Woodview Drive. Under existing conditions, an 18 -inch storm
sewer drains south down Park Drive between Wintergreen Avenue and West Woodview Drive,
and drains to a "back -pitched" 24 -inch storm sewer for a short distance between West Woodview
Drive and East Woodview Drive. The 24 -inch storm sewer combines with a 60 -inch storm sewer
from the south and drains into a 60 -inch trunk storm sewer draining east down East Woodview
Drive. Alternative 4 is intended to relieve this restriction at Park Drive and East Woodview Drive
and eliminate the "back -pitched" pipe on Park Drive. The proposed improvement, as shown on
Figure 9, provides an additional 30 -inch storm sewer adjacent to the 60 -inch trunk storm sewer
on East Woodview Drive. The existing "back -pitched" 24 -inch storm sewer is proposed to be
replaced with a positive sloped 30 -inch storm sewer. These improvements result in an additional
0.1 -foot flood depth reduction at the intersection of Park Drive and Woodview Drive for the 10 -
year storm event. The conveyance improvements also show minimal benefits for the 2- and 5 -
year storm.
Alternative 4 is not recommended because the cost of the additional sewer conveyance
improvements outweighs the minimal benefit. Figure 9 provides a schematic for the Alternative
4.
The estimated cost of Alternative 4 is $2.0 million.
B*r3,
hfistopher B_ Burke Engineerinq, Ltd.
25
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study
September 22, 2015
rj
iL
tl NIL
% L
A
Rr"
;101%i
4 AL
FM
•I
%4 4
*Jb du
'
E '
REPt!AC30" EWERS 5X 5Ri'-Bi-s
- I -
FOR INCREASEDJ�-.QNVEYANCE
4r C1 PROPOSED PUMP STATION
W II
jr
lit
'AL
J "", 0yl
ll
V
-A
Cr
ix Ct
Ina
�Orj A
ADDITI 0 N A L 30-1 N H, SEW E R
PROPOSED PARALLEL TO
EX4 ISTING 60-I4�
NC,H SEWER %
A*
"IF 0 1 14
II
, 4
V0
41
Figure 9. Alternative 4 Schematic
Christopher R. Burke Engine-ei-ing, Ltd.
26
Pura p
Stati an #2
PU MI) 10
Way P -M P i 4
Fla te :cfsi
Ex i{f-.g S-Lart
El evati on I -
P --pried Start
I.? a t: i .0 in I ft)
7 -Q SWP -1
&S
631.2S
C
-29
P#2 -_ti %I P-2.
&S
632.2:-
G30
PQ SWP-3
&S
11
631
Prop 1
40
629
PrDp 2
411,
6,30
Prop 3
401
17 1
ll
V
-A
Cr
ix Ct
Ina
�Orj A
ADDITI 0 N A L 30-1 N H, SEW E R
PROPOSED PARALLEL TO
EX4 ISTING 60-I4�
NC,H SEWER %
A*
"IF 0 1 14
II
, 4
V0
41
Figure 9. Alternative 4 Schematic
Christopher R. Burke Engine-ei-ing, Ltd.
26
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
u
Table 5 below provides a comprehensive summary of the modeling results for all Pump Station
#2 drainage area improvement alternatives.
Table S. Pump Station #2 Drainage Area Improvement Alternatives —
10 -Year Storm Results Summary Table
'Includes storm sewer upgrades as described in Section 3.5
2Based on low overtopping or low entry elevations provided in the field survey (existing conditions at -risk homes is 19)
Alternative 5 consists of increasing the pumping capacity at Pump Station #1. Under current
conditions, Pump Station #1 can achieve a maximum pumping capacity of 17 cfs. Because only
180 cfs of cumulative additional pumping capacity is allowed for both Pump Station #1 and #2,
the proposed additional rate for Alternative 5 at Pump Station #2 is 60 cfs. To obtain the
additional pumping capacity, this alternative consists of constructing a new pump station adjacent
to the existing pump station to house two (2) new 30 cfs pumps. The wet well for the proposed
pump station would be connected to the existing wet well so stormwater can be conveyed to both
pump stations and the pump controls can be modified to utilize all four (4) pumps. The proposed
pump start control elevations for both the existing and proposed pumps are provided in Table 6.
Table 6. Pump Station #1 Proposed Pump Controls
Pump Station
ID
Additional
Proposed
Park Drive and
Seneca Drive
Park Drive and
Woodview Drive
At -Risk Homes
Improvement
p
Maximum
Flood
Resulting
Flood Depth
Resulting
Removed
Required
Storage
Flood Depth
from 10 -year
Alternative
Pumping Rate
Volume (ac-
ft)
Flood Depth
(ft)
Reduction
(ft)
Flood Depth
(ft)
Reduction (ft)
Inundation
Areae
(cfs)
'Includes storm sewer upgrades as described in Section 3.5
2Based on low overtopping or low entry elevations provided in the field survey (existing conditions at -risk homes is 19)
Alternative 5 consists of increasing the pumping capacity at Pump Station #1. Under current
conditions, Pump Station #1 can achieve a maximum pumping capacity of 17 cfs. Because only
180 cfs of cumulative additional pumping capacity is allowed for both Pump Station #1 and #2,
the proposed additional rate for Alternative 5 at Pump Station #2 is 60 cfs. To obtain the
additional pumping capacity, this alternative consists of constructing a new pump station adjacent
to the existing pump station to house two (2) new 30 cfs pumps. The wet well for the proposed
pump station would be connected to the existing wet well so stormwater can be conveyed to both
pump stations and the pump controls can be modified to utilize all four (4) pumps. The proposed
pump start control elevations for both the existing and proposed pumps are provided in Table 6.
Table 6. Pump Station #1 Proposed Pump Controls
Pump Station
ID
pump ID
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Existing Start Proposed Start
Elevation (ft) Elevation (ft)
Pump Station
Proposed Pump
Station
Exhibit 9 shows the resulting inundation map with the Alternative 5 improvement. This
alternative reduces the risk of flooding for two (2) structures currently at -risk of flooding during
the 5 -year storm. There are minimal flood reduction benefits with this alternative for the 10 -
year storm.
hfistopher B_ Burke Engineering, Ltd.
27
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Table 7. Alternative 5 — At -Risk Structures Summary Table
Storm Existing Alternative At -Risk Homes
Event Conditions At- 5 At -Risk Removed from
Risk Homes Homes Inundation Area
Alternative 5 is not recommended because it of the minimal number of the nineteen (19) at -risk
structures from the 10 -year inundation area.
The estimated cost of Alternative 5 is $1.0 million.
The purpose of Alternative 6 is to provide stormwater storage in an open space upstream of Pump
Station #1 to increase the level of protection with the increase in pump capacity for Pump Station
#1. Alternative 6 proposes to provide stormwater storage within open space located on the Indian
Grove Elementary School property. This school property was selected for stormwater storage
due to its location relative to adjacent trunk storm sewers that would allow a larger diversion of
flow, and the availability of open space. This improvement allows stormwater flows from the
intersection of Burning Bush Lane and Tano Lane, where trunk storm sewers combine, to back up
into the stormwater storage area through a proposed 54 -inch storm sewer. Approximately 7.0
acre-feet of stormwater storage volume was created for this alternative within the footprint
shown on the open space portion of the school property in Exhibit 10. The stormwater storage is
provided in the northern portion of the open space on the school property and drains completely
by gravity (no pump station is required). A 12 -inch diameter restrictor on the trunk storm sewer
just downstream of proposed 54 -inch storm sewer allows low flows to pass through and higher
flows to back up into the stormwater storage area and ultimately drain when the storm event has
ended. The proposed stormwater storage reduces the flowrate on the Tano Lane trunk storm
sewer from about 53 cfs to 15 cfs.
While flows to Pump Station #1 are reduced, a proposed pump station is still required to prevent
the low-lying areas along Park Avenue from flooding. The pump controls and configuration are
the same as Alternative 5, with the exception of a reduced pumping rate (Alternative 5 pumping
rate is 60 cfs). The proposed pump station requires a maximum pumping rate of 40 cfs which is
provided in two (2) 20 cfs pumps. Alternative 6 reduces the flood depth at South Park Drive from
2.0 feet to 0.8 feet. Exhibit 10 shows the conceptual layout for Alternative 6 and the resulting
inundation map.
Currently, the proposed excavated stormwater storage for Alternative 6 is shown in the northern
portion of open space at the school. The location of the stormwater storage area can be adjusted
to accommodate the needs of Indian Grove Elementary School and the Village. Another viable,
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
28
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
but more costly option, would be to provide the stormwater storage in an underground vault and
restore the open space to its current condition.
Alternative 6 is recommended because it provides the best flood reduction benefit of all the Pump
Station #1 alternatives, removing all at -risk structures from the 10 -year inundation area.
The estimated cost of Alternative 6 is $2.1 million.
Alternative 7 is identical to Alternative 5 with the addition of sewer improvements along South
Park Drive. Under existing conditions, a 12- to 15 -inch storm sewer drains south down Park Drive
between Eastwood Lane and Tano Lane. The section of 15 -inch storm sewer just south of the
lowest catch basin in the low lying area is "back -pitched". This 15 -inch storm sewer drains into
the into the 60 -inch trunk storm sewer draining east down Tano Lane. Based on the existing
conditions analysis, the storm sewer on South Park Drive is undersized for the 10 -year storm
event, even under free-flow gravity outfall conditions, resulting in street inundation. Alternative
7 proposes to increase the storm sewer size on South Park Drive and eliminate the "back -pitched"
section of storm sewer. The proposed improvement replaces the existing storm sewer with an
18- to 24 -inch storm sewer. This alternative provides minimal benefits (< 0.1 foot WSEL reduction)
for the 5- and 10 -year storms because the allowed pump capacity increase of 60 cfs at Pump
Station #1 cannot adequately drain all stormwater, resulting in a level pool along the South Park
Drive depression. Figure 10 shows the conceptual layout for Alternative 7.
Alternative 7 is not recommended because the cost of the additional sewer conveyance
improvements outweighs the minimal benefit.
The estimated cost of Alternative 7 is $1.3 million.
3 hfistopher B_ Burke Engineerinq, Ltd.
29
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study
September 22, 2015
Jr
fl
�� •" r
d,
•
. . .r
u
".
VR
I TL
Film
„
°9 1 ■ I
i
1
1
r
1
� ,- �1i4 ''I<8' 6 ■ � uuuw m �'
■ rR,
®� a �•
'.
0
�m
I
d� rE
d
.,111! 3
ail
,
_ � 1
I” IIn�tt " W
r;
, a .
—"° ■.EFS T �' 1 �_ E'1"°
Er I ISI G STORM SE A C K -PITC H E Y
AT TH I S L [ CATION . PROPOSE❑ STa ISM
—
SEWERHAS P O S,TIVE SLOP_
ID
r n.
p
•• 1 x I
a:
N IM1
y.
j
"91DVuu
I u V
Pump Station W2
p
Ik ■ik m� o�[i� iLJ
R12Lt I I�!ey.i"i on
_a
, ✓ to "�� _
634
` m
r 01 fl
n ��a rd
aM1 "
a=
w
F
�,_ —
m °� _,fir m
.772'1 .�° � •" "•
Oyu �I1
R � 1_3"IAllift
, 1A1 IP
3
3
Figure 10. Alternative 7 Schematic
3 Christopher B. Burke Eri 1neering, Ltd.
6.1
P i u"d S ar#
Fl,evad uri q I1
631]
631
630
$31
30
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Table 8 below provides a comprehensive summary of results for all Pump Station #1 drainage area
improvement alternatives.
Table 8. Pump Station #1 Drainage Area Improvement Alternatives —
10 -Year Storm Results Summary Table
5
60
-
1.9
0.1
0
6
40
7.0
0.8
1.2
4
71
60
-
1.9
0.1
0
'Includes storm sewer upgrades as described in Section 3.7
'Based on low overtopping or low entry elevations provided by field survey (existing condition at -risk homes is 4)
Existing Conditions
The 25 -year storm event was simulated for existing conditions for both free-flow gravity outfall
conditions and for the 10 -year Des Plaines River (DPR) tailwater. Based on the critical duration
analysis, the 2 -hour storm produced the maximum flows and flood stages within the study area.
Previously, it was determined that the existing storm sewer system has approximately a 10 -year
storm event capacity, although some surcharging occurs. The existing conditions XPSWMM
model was simulated with free-flow gravity outfall conditions. Results from this 25 -year storm
event analysis indicate that more significant sewer surcharging and flooding occurs in the low-
lying areas. As seen in Exhibit 11, seven (7) homes are at -risk of flooding.
The existing conditions XPSWMM model was simulated with the FEMA FIS 10 -year DPR flood
elevation, which eliminated all gravity flow from the sewer outfalls and forced all stormwater to
be evacuated with the pump stations. The maximum pumping capacity of Pump Station #1 and
Pump Station #2 are 17 cfs and 25.5 cfs, respectively. Results from this simulation show flooding
of at risk structures due to the limited capacity of the storm sewer system and the limited capacity
of the pump stations. A flood inundation map for the 25 -year storm event with a 10 -year FEMA
FIS tailwater is provided in Exhibit 12. CBBEL identified thrity (30) homes at -risk of flooding for
this storm event.
25 -Year Improvement Alternative
An improvement alternative was developed to provide a 25 -year storm event level of protection
with additional storm sewer conveyance and increased pumping capacity. This alternative did not
include creating additional stormwater storage. First, the 25 -year storm event with free-flow
gravity outfall conditions was used to identify conditions in the storm sewer system that lead to
91"3, hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
31
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
flooding. Once these conditions were identified, additional storm sewer conveyance was
provided to effectively reduce flooding for the 25 -year storm event. In the Pump Station #2
drainage area, a new 36 -inch relief sewer is proposed to run parallel along an existing trunk sewer
starting at the intersection of Maya Lane and Burning Bush Lane. The 36 -inch relief sewer
continues on the same route as the existing trunk sewer to a new outfall to the DPR. Additionally,
the existing storm sewer flowing south down Park Drive is proposed to be replaced with a larger
sewer to provide increased conveyance from a low-lying flood prone area.
Additional storm sewer conveyance is also required in the Pump Station #1 drainage area. A new
36 -inch relief sewer begins on Eastwood Lane west of Burning Bush Lane. The new relief sewer
continues south along Burning Bush Lane and increases to a 42 -inch sewer when it heads west
down Tano Lane. The relief sewer continues to follow the alignment of the existing trunk sewer
and ultimately drains to a new 42 -inch outfall to the DPR. Additionally, the existing storm sewer
flowing south down Park Drive is proposed to be replaced with a larger sewer to provide increased
conveyance from a low-lying flood prone area. The proposed outfalls will result in increased flows
to the DPR from existing conditions only when the DPR is low. Once the DPR begins to rise, these
flows will be significantly reduced. A summary of these flow increases is provided in Table 9.
Table 9. 25 -Year Improvement Alternative Proposed Outfall Flowrate Increases (No Tailwater)
Drainage Area
Existing Maximum Flowrate Proposed Maximum Flowrate Flowrate
From Outfalls (cfs) From Outfalls (cfs) Increase (cfs)
Pump Station #1
Pump Station #2
The storm improvements described above were analyzed for a 25 -year storm event with FEMA
FIS 10 -year tailwater conditions to determine the required pump station capacity upgrades. The
amount of additional required pumping capacity was determined based on achieving 25 -year
storm event level of protection for all at -risk homes. The proposed additional pumping rate for
Pump Station #2 was calculated to be 330 cfs. To obtain this additional pumping capacity, a new
pump station must be constructed adjacent to the existing pump station to house three (3) new
110 cfs pumps. The proposed additional pumping rate for Pump Station #1 was calculated to be
160 cfs which can be provided in a new pump station constructed adjacent to the existing pump
station to house two (2) new 80 cfs pumps. The total cumulative proposed pump capacity
increase from the study area for the 25 -year storm event level of protection improvement
alternative is 490 cfs. Exhibit 13 shows the proposed sewer schematic with pump station
upgrades and the resulting 25 -year storm event inundation area. This improvement alternative
removes all at -risk homes from the 25 -year storm event inundation area. A summary of the 25 -
year storm event improvement alternative is provided in Table 10.
91"3, hffstopher B_ Burke Engineering, Ltd.
32
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Table 10. 25 -Year Improvement Alternative Results Summary (With Tailwater)
Location Existing Flood
Depth
Proposed Flood
Depth
Flood Depth
Reduction
Park Drive and Seneca Drive 2.6
0.5
2.1
Park Drive and Woodview Drive 2.0
0.9
1.1
South Park Drive 2.3
0.0
2.3
A summary of pump station capacity upgrades from existing to proposed conditions is shown in
Table 11.
Table 11. 25 -Year Improvement Alternative Pump Capacity Increases
Drainage Area Existing Pump Capacity
Flowrate (cfs)
Proposed Pump Capacity
Flowrate Increase (cfs)
Pump Station #1
Pump Station #2
pill
25 -year Improvement Conclusion
At the request of the Village, CBBEL developed a 25 -year storm event level of protection
improvement alternative to remove all at -risk structures for FEMA FIS 10 -year DPR tailwater
conditions. Two proposed sewer outfalls are required for the Pump Station #1 and #2 drainage
areas, which increase flowrates to the DPR under free-flow gravity outfall conditions.
Additionally, pump station capacity upgrades are necessary to maintain a 25 -year storm event
level of protection during the FEMA FIS 10 -year DPR tailwater conditions which eliminates all flow
from the gravity sewer outfalls. The cumulative pump capacity flowrate increase from the study
area was calculated to be 490 cfs.
Based on the pre -Levee 37 analysis (see Section 2.1), CBBEL determined the amount of historic
overland flow to the DPR for a 10 -year storm in the study area while the DPR is at the FEMA FIS
10 -year flood elevation to be 240 cfs. The existing three (3) pump stations have a combined
capacity of 60 cfs, therefore the allowable increase in pumping capacity is 180 cfs. Because the
25 -year improvement alternative proposes to pump an additional 490 cfs, the proposed pump
station upgrades may not be feasible from a permitting standpoint. Because new sewer outfalls
are required for the 25 -year improvement alternative, additional permitting may be required.
Permits required, but not limited to, may include:
• A floodway construction permit from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources —
Office of Water Resources (IDNR-OWR)
• A regulatory permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE)
• Authorization from the Cook County Forest Preserve (CCFP)
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
33
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
The estimated cost of Alternative 8 is $12.3 million.
At the request of the Village, CBBEL analyzed an additional 25 -year storm event level of protection
improvement alternative using the allowable pump rate of 240 cfs from the study area. This
alternative was developed to determine how much storage volume needed to be created to
achieve a 25 -year level of protection while maintaining the 240 cfs flowrate. As previously
discussed the allowable pump rate increase is 180 cfs. Similar to Alternatives 3 and 6, the storage
areas are proposed at Robert Frost Elementary in the Pump Station #2 drainage area and at Indian
Grove Elementary in the Pump Station #1 drainage area because these are the only availbale open
spaces in hydraulically effective locations. Approximately 18.0 acre-feet of flood storage is
proposed in the open space at Robert Frost Elementary, and 12.0 acre-feet at Indian Grove
Elementary. Similar to Alternatives 3 and 6, both storage areas are intended to divert flow from
the adjacent trunk sewers with the use of restrictors on the existing downstream pipes. This
reduces the amount of flow conveyed downstream to the pump stations.
Pump capacity increases are required to achieve a 25 -year storm event level of protection. The
proposed additional pumping rate for Pump Station #2 was calculated to be 120 cfs which can be
provided in a new pump station constructed adjacent to the existing pump station to house three
(3) new 40 cfs pumps. The proposed additional pumping rate for Pump Station #1 was calculated
to be 60 cfs which can be provided in a new pump station constructed adjacent to the existing
pump station to house two (2) new 30 cfs pumps.
Exhibit 14 shows the proposed improvement schematic with pump station upgrades and the
resulting 25 -year storm event inundation area. This improvement alternative removes all but two
(2) at -risk homes from the 25 -year storm event inundation area during a DPR tailwater condition.
The modeling indicates that the simulated flood elevations for these two homes are
approximately 0.5 -feet higher than their low entry elevation. CBBEL recommends that
floodproofing measures, such as raising the sidewalk, be used to protect these two homes from
flooding during the 25 -year storm event. A summary of the 25 -year storm event level of
protection improvement alternative benefits is provided in Table 12.
Table 12. 25 -Year Improvement Alternative Results Summary (With Tailwater)
The estimated cost of Alternative 9 is $7.5 million.
3 hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
34
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
U
1 PUMP STATION• •
The pump station upgrades discussed in the previous sections are summarized in Table 13. The
existing pump stations' effectiveness can be increased by lowering the existing pump setpoints.
The limits of the existing pumps' minimum submergence levels will need to be reviewed during
design with the pump manufacturer. It is assumed that modifications to the existing pump tubes
will be required which may include formed suction intakes, tube extensions, and other ancillary
components.
Table 13. Summary of Pump Station Upgrades
Depending on the alternative selected, it is assumed that a new poured in place concrete pump
station structure will be constructed adjacent to or in the vicinity of existing Pump Stations #1 and
#2 to house the proposed additional capacity pumps. The pump station's layout will be similar to
the existing Pump Stations which utilize submersible, axial flow propeller pumps mounted in a
steel discharge tube; cast iron flap gates mounted to the discharge tube; and a concrete deck to
locate the NEMA 3R motor control center (MCC) and pump station electrical controls. A new three
phase, 480 volt electric utility (ComEd) service will be required and sized for the load to be served
dependent on pump motor size. Standby power has not been considered for this analysis but
should be considered during the design phase for backup in case of loss of utility power.
The existing pump station structure is not large enough to accommodate the larger pumps and
still satisfy Hydraulic Institute (HI) Standards for sump dimensions (for the larger capacity pumps).
It is recommended to keep the existing station in service during construction of the new station
and incorporate it into the permanent alternative solution to handle smaller storm events, and
provide a stepped or ramped pumping capacity.
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
35
CapacityAlternative Additional Pump
. : ...
1
120
(3) @ 40 cfs/pump
20
(2) 10 cfs/pump
2
100
(3) 33 cfs/pump
3
105
(3) @ 35 cfs/pump
4
120
(3) @ 40 cfs/pump
5
60
(2) @ 30 cfs/pump
6
40
(2) @ 20 cfs/pump
7
60
(2) @ 30 cfs/pump
8
490
PS #2 (3) @ 110 cfs/pump
PS #12 um
() C� 80 cfs /p p
PS #2 (3) @ 40 cfs/pump
9
180
PS #12 um
() @ 30 cfs /p p
Depending on the alternative selected, it is assumed that a new poured in place concrete pump
station structure will be constructed adjacent to or in the vicinity of existing Pump Stations #1 and
#2 to house the proposed additional capacity pumps. The pump station's layout will be similar to
the existing Pump Stations which utilize submersible, axial flow propeller pumps mounted in a
steel discharge tube; cast iron flap gates mounted to the discharge tube; and a concrete deck to
locate the NEMA 3R motor control center (MCC) and pump station electrical controls. A new three
phase, 480 volt electric utility (ComEd) service will be required and sized for the load to be served
dependent on pump motor size. Standby power has not been considered for this analysis but
should be considered during the design phase for backup in case of loss of utility power.
The existing pump station structure is not large enough to accommodate the larger pumps and
still satisfy Hydraulic Institute (HI) Standards for sump dimensions (for the larger capacity pumps).
It is recommended to keep the existing station in service during construction of the new station
and incorporate it into the permanent alternative solution to handle smaller storm events, and
provide a stepped or ramped pumping capacity.
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
35
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
uo
CHAPTER 4 DPR DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS ANALYSIS
To analyze the potential hydraulic impact to the DPR from the proposed pumping rate increase, a
conceptual level hydraulic modeling analysis was performed. The unsteady HEC -RAS hydraulic
model developed as part of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
(MWRDGC) Detailed Watershed Plan (DWP) for the Lower DPR was used for this analysis. The
unsteady HEC -RAS model references flow hydrographs from a previously created HEC -HMS model
to simulate stage versus time along the DPR. Design storms were analyzed to assess potential
DPR hydraulic impacts.
4.1 DESIGN STORMS DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS ANALYSIS
Based on the relatively large size of the DPR watershed and its long flow paths, previous modeling
determined the critical design storm to be the 10 -day event. The critical design storm for the
study area, as determined by the existing condition XPSWMM analysis, is the 2 -hour storm. To
conservatively analyze the effect of the increased pump rates from the study area on the DPR,
Alternative 1 and Alternative 5 were analyzed for the 2-, 10-, and 100 -year storms with FEMA FIS
10 -year flood event elevation. This DPR elevation eliminates all flow from the gravity storm sewer
outfalls. Alternatives 1 and 5 proposed the largest pump capacity increases of 120 cfs and 60cfs,
respectively, for a total flow increase of 180 cfs to the DPR. The pump outfall hydrographs from
each pump station were input into the HEC -RAS model at the nearest downstream cross section
as lateral inflow hydrographs. Inputting the pump outfall hydrographs directly into the HEC -RAS
model is a conservative estimate of impacts; because the area drained by the pump stations is
also included in the HEC -HMS model. Next, the resultant hydrographs at cross sections near the
study area were compared to the baseline conditions hydrographs. The proposed pumps cause
a small increase in the DPR elevation at the beginning of the simulation, approximately ten (10)
days before the maximum stage in the DPR occurs. The area of the river reach with the largest
increase is located at the cross section accepting flows from Pump Station #2. Figure 11 shows
the 100 -year proposed hydrograph at this cross section compared to the baseline hydrograph.
K:hfistopher B- Burke Engineerinq, Ltd.
3
36
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Top of Bank
-------
---------------------
------------------ ---------------------------------------------------
0.9' foot increase with
proposed pump stations
1 �
Figure 11. 100 -Year DPR Hydrograph at Pump Station #2
The lowest contour elevation along the DPR bank at Pump Station #2 is 628 feet, therefore the
potential stage increase from the proposed pump station is contained completely within the
channel.
4.2 DOWNSTREAM IMPACTS ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONII
Based on the HEC -RAS analysis of downstream impacts, CBBEL believes the allowable increase in
proposed pump station capacity of 180 cfs to the DPR would be acceptable with a defined
operating procedure in place. The proposed pump stations capacity increase have minimal impact
on the DPR flood elevations when analyzing design storms. The difference in critical durations
between the DPR and the study area results in a minor stage increase 10 days before the peak of
the DPR.
There are potential scenarios when the DPR has risen to a point where the addition of the full 180
cfs proposed pump capacity could result in an increase in the DPR flood stage that could cause an
adverse impact to downstream roadways, properties and structures. The United States
Geological Service (USGS) stream gage #05529000 - Des Plaines River near Des Plaines is located
at Euclid Avenue approximately 5,000 feet and 1,200 feet downstream of Levee 37 Pump Stations
#2 and #1, respectively. The National Weather Service (NWS) uses this gage with their Advance
Hydrologic Prediction Service to forecast the DPR stage during flood conditions. The NWS has
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
37
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
established stage elevations at this gage that reflect Flood Stage, Moderate Flood Stage and Major
Flood Stage based on potential downstream roadway, property and structure inundation.
An operational protocol should be developed that would determine how many and when the
proposed pumps could be operational. We recommend a Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition (SCADA) system be employed to take the current gage information control the on and
off functions of the proposed pumps. This would bean automated system that would optimize
the level of protection for the Village residential areas while reducing the risk of adversely
impacting DPR flooding at risk downstream roadways, properties and structures
The development of this operational protocol is beyond CBBEL's current scope of services but
should be develop if the Village pursues any of the improvement alternatives that include an
increase in pumping capacity.
91"3, hfistopher B- Burke Engineerinq, Ltd.
38
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
Lull
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION
The purpose of the Levee 37 project is to protect the Village's study area and a portion of the City
from DPR overbank flooding. Based on the existing conditions analysis discussed in Chapter 2,
the storm sewer system in the study area has approximately a 10 -year storm event capacity under
free-flow outfall conditions (no flow capacity reduction from the DPR water level elevation).
Based on discussions with the USACOE, the existing pump stations were designed for sewer flows
assuming non -coincident hydrograph peaks between the study area discharge and the flows in
the DPR. One of the implications of non -coincident peaks is that runoff during a storm event from
the study area would be receding before the rise in the DPR is significant enough to reduce or
eliminate flows from the gravity sewer outfalls. The CBBEL analysis performed in this study
confirmed that the assumption of negligible impact to the storm sewer system from the DPR
water level elevations is a reasonable assumption for design storms. However, the analysis for
the historic April 2013 storm demonstrated that the DPR stage hydrograph reduces the ability of
the storm sewer system to discharge flow during the rainfall event resulting in the pump stations
to be turned on. The analysis further demonstrated that the level of the DPR does not need to
reach a peak level to degrade the capacity of the gravity storm sewer system. Events at and below
the DPR 2 -year flood event level have a significant adverse impact.
The pumps are programmed to activate mostly to evacuate any residual stormwater in the storm
sewer system while the DPR stage is elevated. This design methodology results in the existing
design capacity of the pump stations being low compared to the capacity of the gravity storm
sewer outfalls during a free outfall condition. Because of the limited capacity of the existing pump
stations, the capacity of the storm sewer system is quickly degraded when the DPR water level
elevation rises and a storm event is occurring in the study area simultaneously.
Prior to the development of the existing residential subdivision within the study area, the land
drained overland directly to the DPR. Once developed, during periods when the residential
subdivision's storm sewers surcharge, ponding would initially occur within low-lying areas until
flooding levels filled the streets and stormwater would flow overland down the streets until
crossing River Road and into the DPR prior to the construction of the Levee 37 floodwall.
The construction of the Levee 37 floodwall blocked this overland flow capacity, but the pumps
constructed as part of the Levee did not maintain this flow capacity. An XPSWMM simulation was
performed for pre -Levee 37 conditions to analyze the amount of overland flow to the DPR for a
10 -year storm in the study area while the DPR is at the FEMA FIS 10 -year flood elevation. The
maximum overland flowrate over River Road to the DPR is approximately 240 cfs. The existing
pump stations have a combined capacity of 60 cfs. This means that the Village could increase the
pumping capacity up to this flow rate with any future enhancements to the pump stations.
Because the three (3) existing Levee 37 pump stations have a maximum capacity of 60 cfs, the
allowable increase in pumping rate is 180 cfs.
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
39
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
CBBEL analyzed nine (9) proposed improvement alternatives to improve the level of protection
when the DPR stage restricts the gravity storm sewer outfall capacity. Table 14 summarizes the
components, benefits and costs of the nine (9) proposed improvement alternatives.
A conceptual level downstream hydraulic impacts analysis was performed to assess potential
adverse increases in the DPR water level elevation. Alternatives 1 and 5 were used for the
downstream impacts analysis because they increase the three Levee 37 (3) pump stations capacity
to the allowable 240 cfs. Based on this conceptual level analysis, it is CBBEL's opinion the
maximum flowrate increases from the proposed pump stations (180 cfs) to the DPR would be
acceptable with defined operating protocols. These operating protocols would determine when
the pumping rate for new pump stations should be limited or "shut-off" depending on the DPR
water level elevation recorded at the nearby downstream USGS gage. The existing pumps would
remain on and continue pumping a lesser flow from the study area to the DPR. We recommend
that pump station operational protocol be developed when the Village selects and pursues an
improvement alternative.
After analyzing all the improvement alternatives, CBBEL recommends the Village pursue
Alternatives 3 and 6. The recommended improvements, Alternatives 3 and 6, opinion of probable
cost are $3.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively based on a 2015 cost estimate.
As previously described in Sections 3.3 and 3.6, these alternatives include providing storage at
upstream open space properties to provide a 10 -year level of protection. At this point of the
study, CBBEL believes that Alternatives 3 and 6 should be recommended because:
• They provide the best flood reduction benefit of all the alternatives identified in this
study, removing all twenty-three (23) at -risk homes from the 10 -year inundation area.
• They involve adding flood storage on school and/or park district property. Village staff
previously indicated that both the school district and park district may not be receptive
to the idea repurposing their open space for flood storage. Therefore, this design is
preliminary and flexible and can be adjusted to best meet the needs of both the Village,
school district, and park district. Potential options include re -locating the storage area on
the property or providing the storage in underground vaults at an increased cost.
• If Alternatives 3 and 6 and not feasible from the Village's standpoint, we would then
recommend Alternatives 1 and 5 which are Levee 37 Pump Stations #1 and #2 capacity
upgrades.
• These alternatives increase the cumulative pumping capacity to the DPR by 145 cfs. The
study found the allowable flowrate increase to the DPR to be 180 cfs.
• Based on the initial findings of the downstream impacts analysis, CBBEL believes
increasing the cumulative pump capacity to the DPR by a maximum of 180 cfs would be
acceptable with an operating protocol in place. If the project goes forward, conversations
with the CCFPD, MWRDGC and IDNR-OWR should occur.
hfistopher B. Berke Engineering, Ltd.
40
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study
LM
M
E
E
0
i
G1
H
l"I
B
M
Burke Engy-neering, Ltd.
O
.N
N
Q)
L
Q
N
N
�N
i
U
a-+
M
U
a..+
N
N
O
Q
N
L
N
N
O
i
Q)
O
L-
CL Q
cn
C
O
4-J
>
N
Q)
a -J
C
N
O
L-
O
C
.Q
Q
O
a--1
L
N
>
O
O
C
O
N
ro
CO
N
O
U
N
a+
O
i
Q
O
N
N
>
N
E
L
O
+j
N
f6
Ln
N
L
O
Q
O
Qj
>
(U
QU
L
a
c�
00
N
Q1
+j
f�
C
+j
M
V)
C
N
N
O
L
Q
E
September 22, 2015
N
L
O
L
I
N
E
O
Q1
>
O
E
N
N
E
O
i
O
i
N
z
Ln
MJB/ELG/DRD/TTB
N:\MOUNTPROSPECT\150225\Water\Docs\R.Levee 37 Drainage Study 092215 Village
41
ate-+ m
ca an
E O
+, U ..
•
•
•
Ln
LU
-0 1 C
-14 Ln a) O O
Ln 01 > r -I i a- N
ra fB
E O 41 L1 • •
•
•
•
•
•
•
Q = o Q
0
-0
O }' U
O
LL in QJ
i
•
•
(6
O O
v� v +'
•
•
OJ ^
s +�
D � �
p O
+' • •
o
O
0LL Q)
0
•
•
�0-
a1
> +J p
•
C
0 N
O
LL
•
•
W" s
> +� c
Qj 4-
0 U
U _0 • •
O
� O aJ
cai LL
•
b
> C
4--� O
•
Z Ln _O
i LL Q
•
•
1
E N
CU C
i 0- - • •
O E :L '�a)
•
•
•
•
•
`
•
•
•
•
•
••
X
Qj :3 (6
Q
4J >
a=+
Eaj
0
E Q
41
O OJ
CU W (
(U
•.
■
Q >O
L
Burke Engy-neering, Ltd.
O
.N
N
Q)
L
Q
N
N
�N
i
U
a-+
M
U
a..+
N
N
O
Q
N
L
N
N
O
i
Q)
O
L-
CL Q
cn
C
O
4-J
>
N
Q)
a -J
C
N
O
L-
O
C
.Q
Q
O
a--1
L
N
>
O
O
C
O
N
ro
CO
N
O
U
N
a+
O
i
Q
O
N
N
>
N
E
L
O
+j
N
f6
Ln
N
L
O
Q
O
Qj
>
(U
QU
L
a
c�
00
N
Q1
+j
f�
C
+j
M
V)
C
N
N
O
L
Q
E
September 22, 2015
N
L
O
L
I
N
E
O
Q1
>
O
E
N
N
E
O
i
O
i
N
z
Ln
MJB/ELG/DRD/TTB
N:\MOUNTPROSPECT\150225\Water\Docs\R.Levee 37 Drainage Study 092215 Village
41
0 300 600 1,200
I I I I I I I 1
Feet
1 inch = 300 feet
'
_ ■n.n.n-.r i
EAST PALATINE ROAD RAMP'
ELST PALATINE ROAD _
. •. :, .y,OLD PALATINE ROAD --- _ ;R,S
�■4
Pump #3 Controls
.. ____ ---■. - -- RAMP _
°
_ ■' .. EAST PALATINE ROAD
" .. 1 �' Q:'v ,■n�yr=.,. - •, rrr ; r i - �'-' _4_ '- r F■r K>, Pump ID MRateu(C PS) B
_ Sump Elevation Start Elevation Stop Elevation
_ « ( ,-11 ! i SWP-1 8.-1 633 631.5
629.08
N
II
632.5
6
.e. P9 S„
AREA -10.2 AC •.' ►'.i# - - _ � L
rr
.> -! ., �. _ .,. �•'_c N1592
.,T �= MIN ., r • I l
.. - ■ - «.
- r
r `
■ E _ . . '"t, a�'` > . 2 o' > �> _r1
,, _...,a •-,••< , /4A•r". frm >� <7# 1 ' T • �7AREA 14.1 AC +I P3 , 1'
- _�.•-. ..e �,..i,\ e,_•q f" F W>a .:1 >� a t- CN -90 _ O 7 = C ..
w�� r�: •�
IS MI 1
_ - s� r� N REQ �gq A
S �N ARc=30 MIN w
y
_ Tc 28.
.• AREA=42.3 AC 0
P19t
CN 93 4 *mow AREA'P153.11AC LOVE bRrIIJE'. . v#r
RL
Tc = 37.2 MIN .�
^ ,I
+.. _ QTc=30 MIN _.f T = l'- �f>, I Fl y:° p'•.
«
s.
«, APPLE DRIVE '
WIMBLEDOrNCIRCLvE �. ^ • '� �- - a
- w
ri J r/ r> _ t • , 2 INESAP COU. - •id
�, .\• '..; >
Q R>T OF k+
�_ - + g trr. ' u.u.u.u.u.u.u.um.n.n.n.n.i
r
• � F _
, I
us
-7
_
r
W I"' CRA13A#At DRIVE
I
r
,
r- 2,
'"� . , •' � ; i " �, ' tib.
■ r' CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS- i :t ' o
. .... ■ �rn>.�r�r�n.•�rrrr,rr=rrrr,�rrr■ar�rrr�rrrr,r,r, , 48" STORM SEWER CONVEYS
WESTWILLOWROAD SEMINOLELANE ■°a .rr °>r-_�n °�, ° o - ° FLOW FROM PROSPECT HEIGHTS
` s
°°g a
TO MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT r •�.r_ _WPM -
a
> .
= 1 M r
P
>,
i _ 9
(19
AZTEC LANE ° `• "y "«-,+h
SENEGA w v
• ;1...
1
.* . Uj
a
i y
5 r..
,r
< •m
Q CHIMU ANE Q
wl
Cr
""„., n,. G- - + ■;-■-■j . ° , -I-
Li _i �.., . �•Oo ° �v ,� . °m °8 ° IP
:.; . r. •, ' �- , _ -�. 'v
#2 Controls
'
Pum
--7 r7 Pump ID MaPumpB SumpEIeaCn Start Elevation ion Stop Elevation
ionp Rate(CFS)
SWP-1 8.5 631.25 630j OO
, 1�`'SWP-2 8 628 630.5
8.
SWP-3
1 631.25
v � •
-
ALDERMAN AVENUEL ` V „�
-
.. I, . i CAYUGA LANE
MGM -
o¢ FAYA LANE o0°o r- y� i ..
"F- ° ■
- -
� ■ ALDERMAN AVENUE �' :'' -, �O,�.._r , ' �. 7-
:p
Uj
F _ _ ■ I _ m °m � o
y ■ I y2 .,�:: >. 1 0m ....",_ y.-.'� � !/.\, > r.. >PAl4jNEE L.$NE o° ° < _ ✓:w., >A C ! r.
cD
r o
r =y ■ I , t oOm Gtr `- m a YUMA LA - «. a,F
■ I _ o -
NORTH RIVER WEST COU;,
. r
_ _ I
a
.n.n.n.n.rr.rr.rr.fiY&iQ■MFrii4r�>iiiaD ROAD ° " `o q] p, ° o o °° o a ° ° 0 0 °
° SS��,, 0 0 0
CAST �AIIAP MC �ON�LD ROAD e'•
PQ Irma.; r�r "' 6 r° B ° B - 62 0 ° e e °
_ 53 '6 -d>cv--wra-e o--« y Mw � p-' I I-..'" ! C.��'
Q _ V
F N = M r',I 513 QAC ■ 4 - t...'
S� 24. ,,.1
om
:v
L_21a
o.
AREA 2.9 o n o • _AREA 15 0 �!
-
CIN o ° ° A • R } - 'e ,CN -86 N, -
.' ..•..�.. Y OJ S6 .. / Tc - 16 8 MIN,, j
EAT WOOD LANE 6 6 ° F _ 7 ° a44\' 0
-
AREA 9.5 AC o =86- X..;Tc-20.4 MIN• - _ N_ ,A r }, ,41.-.._. _..-;i• I S14
R 31.8 AREA
' C
� AR CN 165 AC !- 5395 6
Tc 16.BMN f( `
-S4 - .. k -.. �-. - 55 T ....°...�.. ..,,, o (DO^. °• r 515 R"v MIN vAl
."•. 1 r - - _ - - - .. .- --AREA=15.8 AC - .-. f,n - _... ..__..,, I
r,
AR,-S4'
REA=12.9 AC y.. x; _ .' -.I
AREA= AC
LU
CN=85 P - ... Q• .! I- Z CN -851 ■
r•, ... „� i ..Tc=33.6 MIN. R• _
r,.l+.+�y, F,�',. ' :.., - -" p �o".•rw r Qqi.� 3 StTIfA _. r_'>�:•S7 ;15 MIN S38
Tc -
43.2 MIN -"�" "-`""' >�pE> • ° Tc
C R 1.'�, - -. ` o r RC X64 ¢ A
h r g i s16 AREA 19'AC
P ¢ C Y CN=16 it
/ j �- X REA-25AC r
.. ••. CN84
Tc 27.6 MIN
EA
P r - �V _ r )}c-40.2 MIN .
\ � u
a.. 9 _ . t ♦ T
d" � -'••, Tc - 15 MINI
'i/J, " I
EDWARD ROAD ; - - - r r, } 80 -, 4> - '- y S8 1
4 �"yr r I•.' I.. °^.0 22.B MIN u •«` .. ��" �, I 141
`�
>. J' I FAREA=3AC O 1 4
8.-.,, .# TAN LANE �.., h ,„ . '+ ,'i u.
° n�\/
y\% v m X 54" fi0:--.AREA=24 C AREA= 6AC
1 °CPN PNE F -�►. s AREA=11.3 Ac' �, r �5-� rf_�� a ro=z1MI wn;r r1
- 54 v _
MI IN
Tc =25.8 MIN }' p �•. r n , it AREA`�0
n�r�r�r�r�rrrrrrrrr�r�rr.rrrrrrrr� �.. , « -.a`_ " o •? R,d w Ynt',• !' 6 •kr. ': ¢ �iF 1z 12" 12" ,°t
A
Vlo
G-..- "o '95" +� r>. AREA=6.S AC �CN=,90 _,•
y r•.f- v
- <
\ / '. CORKT , 'CANE rt r•� 533- JJ� r I f Tc' 4.2 MIN '\
, + \P 10..• OAK ORI r 7.` e, f �. v
* RT
J
# :>• �• > >8a t COU t CN -85 8534 18' %535
A '•. �T1� q L AREA 0.7AC
R \ DR «* "V'�' .2 MIN 12 y 1 AREA=6.1A CN '91
�� \` �...' !'...". _�: ^^ .> >. CN389 I v t•
A �,°o m
'-AREA=56.SAC " �_` 811 , i.i, 1i , I ^'- ren .� = MIN ^Tc=6MIN ^
_ „ , '• :. �, Tc -34 - '�v ;.. '. ' ♦ . �ic .3
519 Y CN -85 w•. / w� i `1 AREA -14.2 AC - >'� 60..
'p Tc=61.2 MIN 1R,/ U •> c>2 r T�72��� �• • Pump #1 Controls
AREA X5.3 AC -a -
1CN =,77 t` i N C Rt - Tc C252 MIN ' ~ .._$ 530 o6�j �' Max Pumping ti
�� °•
Tc � - o •d 0 - _. 0 r $32 Pump ID Sump Elevation Start Elevation Stop Elevation
,r.�: y R o= 0 D , I _AREA 0.8 AC Rate (CFS)
O - R .I.' !` .>b " .AREA=5.1 A� AREA= 1.6 AC 0
CN89",'., SWP-1 8.5 631.75 629.75
"'A•••� .-.` .,; - /. ,`y�',,F• i y i P r k. .._--:�.4. ..� _ _ Mi 627.5
SWP-2 8.5 627.5 634 631
,`. > CN=85-CN =86^,r
12 1 id Tc
15.6 MIN 7>i>Tc=15MIN
�
,'..: 1'I .i` • 'ri, A .%. -. F� 'rte 15^ _�n., _..F MIN, Tc
,. #. .F..,a a\ 7! _ _ :•, , ♦ � b _ n4 F= J< <<
.. z
a 4m, �. >J yip
a.. ow•. ` �L ly o, 1` �II irlm�r S72 *17", n 4Md�'r: AREA 282 ACS..
\ b0 , ,. •mi. F - s► CN '= 88](x`
Im m -.
"� 24 „..' '�►'/ �t a '.'#.�I AREA=� 8AC _
A
�JTc-19.8 MIN
AREA
1 9A i t.1 .
, .R -� o � 16" "`•,�, J ztTc=19.8 MIN AREA=1091AC A i
_._. �, #• v. ♦ ` r•�` C3 8312"
q o`
¢ %� a �. _ \-- Tc 1 MIN
_ M gg u
nr -
.
�'�, , I "! =tr- •�-�'"` : &"»M` a � r .. �, ° d%_ z � _ � z . _� ,r_ `I' 1��'t {-' . 12•• �° '° x � 4 � . � .
r.,. 520 -.... 6"•tea ! '> t"",.�;> .�
"
AREA 6 -
y 11 t i.. y r W �.. S27
72" 2 „ CN=86 ^' A "f"�' I 1Lu�.. g 1 .. r
° o .< -Tc 36.6 MIN .. ` 521 `._•`t 'Ifa'� __-._-4 w:t >a►MF. - AREA-, 1.2 AC"
*� A_ST UCLI NUE_ .+ m AREA=13.7 ACS 0 r 4 - - Q Q - ,�CN=94
N 18'• ^' ^' 18 w 24•• -. F i s
0 0 o a > > a ekr2 42
.� >-- --CN =84;y?,�i. >-.31-> 0 .523 i �4` ruq Tt-4.2 MIN •k y". '+
O O f o-"'. AREA-71'AC>
... - -. �•..'r_ - Tc=34.8 MI N. .k'>82 ,�48.. 4 sPr
- ; CN - 84 R r a •'.
� .. ,+_- .«. � v - . __ .... ._.�..,, _ r_• .� � AREA 7.7 AC � s ." -
.f�4:f F N=85' -
T.
-85'_ ` +• - Tc 31.8 MIN - i- �_ > -[r •.
m 0 0 • Q,` > Tc -39.6 MIN _ ♦._ ;r +, c r S26
7 i
AZALE, PLACE 1 °y° -:� R - ..t '" AREA=0.9
.. 0 �._.Q .e_j'r '. 1 93 _ - >.'. 1' �• �'.
_
r, ° ^� t t>w T v, «-,4
Tc 4.2 MIN
_. - • _ r
LEGEND a r M1�A�A 4 A LANE' ...,_.._. ,} P - r IVY LANE c m 325 t . • ,' ,
- ' ., O AR CN -190 AC
�." r �`." r ` Tc' 10.2 MIN -.
m
STORM MANHOLE -
30.. I`" °RS• d�., p 4\ ° 1c- Q e -fI*YLAN z.
yr t~`I ar P r r E{'a
♦ - .� �:� „
< 1
STORM SEWER-. l egssw oD k
c / # \ v �
,
1r 1 P°' , e :. • �� an W V � i*"',r- --� 1 vow
A
LEVEE 37 CYCOURcr-„a. > �� �r�,,� > . # �' p I •i ";;�� �.
„r U �l,a-f1�f•. S24
PUMP #1 SUBBASINS = - !� 5 r AREA=,.S
i'_ f o > r `. J ! a,.'LO NE o. rr e. �-pyvCN=92 AC*
o Z :J- c - F.. I ••. W _ . \ w`*1,•Tc - 7.2 MIN 1 v
PUMP #2 SUBBASINS ERs -
. :..Q.
'. "•. oo BITT W T LANE i i
PUMP #3 SUBBASINS -" � -
yn.n.rr� ,s....,».... -^ x <'- w .F •.. ^ ti- m. 4_ .. »- ^•., Y b [• °m., ./' �^ ✓ °
bR•
y, e
W
- MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY�.,, .. ° z c- �• ., ° °
�r.rr.rr.r� IBERTY (PURT
1
HOPI L 18`
r -P
CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING LTD.
9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 600
Rosemont, Illinois 60018
� 847 823-0500
CLIENT:
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
DSN. MJB
TITLE:
STUDY AREA SUBBASIN &
STORM SEWER MAP
PROJ. NO. 15-0225
CHAD. ELG
ALE
SHEET 1 OF 1
GSCUSER
No. DATE NATURE OF REVISION MODEL ArcGIS9.2
DRAWING NO.
EX 1
FILE NAME:
DATE:
*z F—K`(
0
0 300 600 1,200
v
pll
Feet
1 inch = 600 feetwr
"I rL
I Y1
T 7;
p
�j
�7
.77
2 �p
40'
VFW, SIR F
Tr
e. FT
Im.
Ji
J
06
(PUMP #2) N PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
L
RIM EL. = 633.88
r
EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.84
OL
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 2.96 FT
.4
r
77
70. r°'_ ,-.. r e� �r �
� r
fA
7r r
%k
av7
...... ►RIM
(PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
EL. = 634.78
EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.88
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 2.10 FT
41
po
'j.
"m ow -
F IYr
p 7 --1
C 77
r j
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
0-1
0 1 -2
0 2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
>8
IF
(PUMP #1) PARK DRIVE LOW C. B. B.
Y'. 7 RIM EL. = 635.67
EX FLOOD WSEL = 637.71
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 2.04 FT
rl
C gal HIM I
o
L, ,14iwry
� wo
I.
pL
w d4
AF
'71
p CIO
my
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE 1 Tc�
TITLE
15-0225
DATE 8/11/15
0 300 600 1,200
Feet
1 inch 600 feet
=
rw
JpIAIIi
ry
m— 777
r r 171
�o
6
6
Aw t
1 ft
i7
pok� OF
7 'oil
7
—
m
It.
PUMP #2) N PARK DRIVE LOW CB.
.
J.'-
RIM EL. = 633.88
EX FLOOD WSEL = 633.16
EX FLOOD DEPTH 0.00 FT
7
41
yq
(2,
eo,
#2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B. 01
......rw
(PUMP
RIM EL.
= 634.78
0, J, 100,
EX FLOOD WSEL 635.68
�EX FLOOD DEPTH 0.90 FT
®r
'j.
-
r
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
0-1
�01 -2
0 2-3
0 3-4
0 4-5
0 5-6
-7 6-7
7-8
>8
CHRISTOPHER G. BURKE I TC�
C1.`,:'`-' VveS 1-41gqw-; Ro;w, suite iDDU TITLE
111ific)IS 60018
CIO
r
PROJECT NO.
15-0225
DATE 8/11/15
0 1,200
300 600
Feet
7.
1 inch = 600 feet
LVA I as III on i
tr %
VNNNNNK
77 F
M.
I Tq,
OIL
r IFIL
IL
AT
(PUMP #2) N PARK DRIVE LOW C. B. IF
N_" —O RIM EL. = 633.88 -ry l_ ,; 1 .�
EX FLOOD WSEL = 634.11 ---
EX FLOOD DEPTH 0.23 FT
'7 J
tix
fh
F4
- Ix-
IWO N'- AN-
A-,
(PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
RIM EL. = 634.78
w EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.72
X.r
EX FLOOD DEPTH 1.94 FT
INN FIN
7
.00
17
No
7
(PUMP #1) PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
LEGEND %
RIM EL. = 635.67
I EX FLOOD WSEL = 637.83
0 Pump Station EX FLOOD DEPTH 2.16 FT _ _ -_ '_ "-.- W
Levee 37
7
ILPIWIl �01 IN
'7
I OOYR 2HR STORM
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
0-1
0
1 -2
--4
03-4
0 4-5
5-6
�
-7 7 1
- th
6
7-8
vu
B.
.*4* ell 6"t 112'
>8
PROJECT NO.
M3CHRISTOPHER U. BURKE
1.1119 11a RGiJil' 'SlIlte TITLE
(84 71 BZj-',- 0-.00
15-0225
DATE 8/11/15
Al
0 300 600 1,200
FeetP" o", , p
'40
1 inch = 600 feet
ru
F17 -
J6
r .
r
<
eo
IL �16 P
16 (PUMP #2) N PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
RIM EL. = 633.88
I W-.1 J
EX FLOOD WSEL = 632.74
(PUMP #1) PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
RIM EL. = 635.67
EX FLOOD WSEL = 635.94
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 0.27 FT
. eA
Rp
t 66
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER G. BURKE r;7; 1 T C�
C1.`,:•`-, VveS H1gqw_; Ro;w' suite iDDU TITLE
Illific)IS 60018
15-0225
DATE 8/11/15
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 0.00 FT
-2 pw
lllpamm - am mai
1A
fA
r
Ar
PK`
It r
q"t
(PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
41/
.0
awl. ol
RIM EL. = 634.78
EX FLOOD WSEL = 634.68
FLOOD DEPTH 0.00 FT
�EX =
:411
j* Awlo_
r r
F_ c--_ . FIN,
(PUMP #1) PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
RIM EL. = 635.67
EX FLOOD WSEL = 635.94
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 0.27 FT
. eA
Rp
t 66
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER G. BURKE r;7; 1 T C�
C1.`,:•`-, VveS H1gqw_; Ro;w' suite iDDU TITLE
Illific)IS 60018
15-0225
DATE 8/11/15
0 300 600 1,200 -_
Feet,
1 Inch = 600 feet
,r...r-
":,' = _ - m .:fig' _ • , `i," �� .
r '
"
s
•-
i
m
_ r
�R-
w sr
Ir
_ ry
' 7,
Fi
V t
r.
I vo%A,
e.
PUMP #2 N PARK DRIVE LOW CB (RIM EL. = 633.88)
STORM EVENT
FLOOD WSEL FLOOD DEPTH
1 -YEAR
633.95
0.07
2 -YEAR
635.56
1.68
5 -YEAR
635.96
2.08
10 -YEAR
636.19
2.31
a.,, , : v't�,1„ -_T .... ,,,� � ,w.w _,� —. _ _ _ .� �, . ate. w•..
r 1/
4 T
PUMP #2 S PARK DRIVE LOW CB (RIM EL. = 634.78)
STORM EVENT
FLOOD WSEL
FLOOD DEPTH
1 -YEAR
634.69
0.00
2 -YEAR
636.02
1.24
5 -YEAR
636.52
1.74
10 -YEAR
636.63
1.85
.w r'PF
114
w.
wl
PUMP #1 PARK DRIVE LOW CB (RIM EL. = 635.67)
STORM EVENT
FLOOD WSEL FLOOD DEPTH
1 -YEAR
636.34
0.67
2 -YEAR
636.77
1.10
5 -YEAR
637.44
1.77
10 -YEAR
637.65
1.98
10YR 2H R STORM
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
0 0 —
aw
ya r —. t• r — � r,, a
Fw -
_ 2 - 4V a
_ w
0 m
r �
3-4
47
5-6
6-7
7-8
a
Y ry
7 � j
,
, L .. r � -_ � � rw�� �:4 rte• �.w�.,' .. -_'.. �`.�...", Mw .� �� � �Y 4 ° '�
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER B. BURKiE 1sc�
rtie TITLE
15-0225
DATE 8/11/15
0 100 200 400
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet
u
M
. rq
• t
x
`/
m
48. 48 001 n4w
•
> > gyp., "of h N r
n w
" ^ w
'A • • i " .,, ..� .+dh � 1, � a1 � ,��. "�' 'M" ` d, � M r�N , t Y r �Y . � ::' � '�' ,M " � .i y 4 �'� � ,nY
1�
"
k
JL
Y
Pump #2 Park Drive Low CB (Rim EI. = 633.88)
Storm Event
Ex Flood WSEL
Pr Flood WSEL
2 -Year
635.56
632.45
5 -Year
635.96
634.96
10 -Year
636.19
635.36
J
w
01
�,..
i w kEPLACE,30" SEWERS�WITH,5jX 5',RCBCS M
FOR INCREASED CONVEYANCE
O PROPOSED PUMP STATION
o
v n
' err
i Y � V �r Mn
a • r I � X
Pump Station #2
Pump ID Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Existing Start
Elevation (ft)
Proposed Start
Elevation (ft)
P#2 SWP-1 8.5
631.25
629
P#2 SWP-2 8.5
632.25
630
P#2 SWP-3 8.5
633.25
631
Prop 1 40
-
629
Prop 2 40
-
630
Prop 3 40
-
631
y � Y
` i 1• �4
4
Pump #2 Park Drive Low CB (Rim EI. = 634.78)
78,.
1 IY
o
I
Storm Event
Ex Flood WSEL
Pr Flood WSEL
2 -Year
636.02
632.35
•
v
72" t N.
5 -Year
636.52
635.63
J
I
10 -Year
636.63
636.45
+
4
I of
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER B.. BURKiE
TITLE
■ t�.� t��y ,s;e
•Y YY
)f d
, ,^��
inu
LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
LEVEE 37
a STORM MANHOLE
STORM SEWER
FLOOD EVENT
AT -RISK HOMES
10 -YEAR (10)
5 -YEAR (1)
2 -YEAR (0)
10YR 2HR STORM
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
�0-1
�1-2
2-3
3-4 3- 4
�4-5
5-6
6-7 �6-7
�7-8
>8
15-0225 L
DATE 8/10/15
C) .
f
W Q
r"i i O O
Z
Ln
Z Z
O MO rl O> O rl W
y N O N M M N M M JLL
o �t } l0 l0 l0 l0 1.0 1.0 O
o - Q > ~ = W
LL o W L
a.w❑ Q W0
U W in
w
L a.,,
C N N N p O O O> N p N co �n .o r --co
W O i i i i i i a
'Z_(Yii i z W
y *k N j lM0 tMD LJJ d (n (n J O O N M L C) Ono
AV
w w J O O ui
LL
� � I
Q. to
' a v Ln Ln Ln
kM w 00 00 06 m m m
x •.: " „.
oc
c1 N M • . - .- • Y s}
N N Ln OO O
N N
r
r • .. b
V,
.A •
X7�
} „0 N•'.
,
. �„ -
_ „08
.IT 1117 X 99
Ln 471
A L.
.r •
let
eE ,
R � - ' m � � .� ' I, W a
00
M
A 40 J:
_ - AIPt _
LI) aLrim Al.
CN
LLJ
A It
W,K
iw k' zap* "
..� ,
Ilk, 0
Lu
A!A y ' , W QV)'r _ i
- t
W
V
VIA
-„
-
WcoWW 1►` �,_ �,J OO
'
u ,
f)
F b
J a i
�, ' J 00J J
. W O O W r W W
w, �w
-.�
X .:1— J,,�! 1 -.1.1 -.-.2
_1
JOI U,
-16 �o
r NW J�� w �_ _ n
1 � '
O d a 1 � w o 0 � 0
J W �_ Q 1_. w , - " it
A Q W X JN•
g,
.+ WO �• Nowa �. _ Q�w �I° l ,�"' �n
N F 4I. k = Q L L �.. .
O Q d.
j
00
w Q _cn p al
baa I I� gg4 Wed . 1 n
•
`J
"-'
Ibft�
nom. ,
—O�
CD ., m
olt
80
v z > > > d �.
Q O .,cVQ -s J i
J
__j
NwQ
Q
__ p N
II L P �I
81 • ' - : ,,
• _ __... —o oB O L
71 A
48"Cj
RCPk &
.
r
A
-i
..
,
a
Ll
. i
a.
ui
j
„ r
^�
n
.,.y„'�j,J - •
^ 1 ley
T
A�_
CO
LLJ" exp
y4PR'`.'"- _..,,..1 - IM I ♦... JF. ,P W 1 O„
ll
LU CID
LL
�y k
(V
LL, AM
A j
ar r-
17 1 p _
00
AL W4 r"t, 0f iiaLC) t ,.0. +
W LL N 00
Derr N t�N I I I M M W
CN
1 1l7 a II II !� r ' tr i Lij
U CC
b a z
x •.
• J J
#', 107J
1121
' r
0 100 200 400 cc
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet
� w
12' •..
I •
12" 12"., 12" 1
00
> >0-, >8_78,,
,
a
r
v" I
r
�R•' i
9
700" r
LOA
t
Y A
q
27 ,� 1 �� ,r,� .
j
IV
' 4
17 • w�•4 q `"^ �� y � gy
" e
,..., w 8 • t NV
NOW
17 y ,
A.� ` �.� V #
a et 12"
°u
"
w'e N
s'*7`• u "
CNV
— -----"
f rr M
�y
q
F r
V
V
V M urypysW�� .Y,A1 w w. ►',
"E y
JLi
V a
m i
> > > >t�4__ > > Ln kM V
0 11 • 1
° r .
• '.�' 4 "M
Pump #1 Park Drive Low CB (Rim EI. = 635.67) _ "
Storm Event Ex Flood WSEL Pr Flood WSEL�
m
12" ,
2 -Year 636.77 634.43
5 -Year 637.44 637.12
10 -Year 637.65 637.58
'T V
I
�o
V 1 M .
all
7-
12N ov, A/
r�
71, 1
V M
t 72„
v
.. a' 41
_ E 0 3 7,2 > O
, x�' •eco'
W N A
8'
> 27 • oo •'' 12' 12" 12' 12
27 v -
10 A� �� -24„ 27”
�A (
1 "`
r7 r
� -T
�I n(F�)
00
w � .
� w
ti;1w
00 A
+ 1�
t `
I SOA
vx:� A.
15" 12"
> > <_ <
.�pulp 0.
r
0 I
a
_'A" • b< '< ",
cc
12
A'
Y
a a 48.. 00
"
".
M
4
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER S. RURKE, i Tc�
X575 W e9i Mlgyns Road, Suite bOO TITLE
Rosemont Ill rnols 60018
■ (8471823-0500
LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
LEVEE 37
a STORM MANHOLE
STORM SEWER
FLOOD EVENT
AT -RISK HOMES
10 -YEAR (4)
5 -YEAR (1)
2 -YEAR (0)
10YR 2HR STORM
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
0-1
1-2 �1-2
2-3
3-4 3- 4
�4-5
5-6
6-7 �6-7
�7-8
>8
15-0225
DATE 8/10/15
Pump Station #1
Max Pumping
Existing Start
Proposed Start
Pump ID
Rate (cfs)
Elevation (ft)
Elevation (ft)
P#2 SWP-1
8.5
631.75
630
P#2 SWP-2
8.5
634
631
Prop 1
30
-
630
ProD 2
30
-
631
.�pulp 0.
r
0 I
a
_'A" • b< '< ",
cc
12
A'
Y
a a 48.. 00
"
".
M
4
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER S. RURKE, i Tc�
X575 W e9i Mlgyns Road, Suite bOO TITLE
Rosemont Ill rnols 60018
■ (8471823-0500
LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
LEVEE 37
a STORM MANHOLE
STORM SEWER
FLOOD EVENT
AT -RISK HOMES
10 -YEAR (4)
5 -YEAR (1)
2 -YEAR (0)
10YR 2HR STORM
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
0-1
1-2 �1-2
2-3
3-4 3- 4
�4-5
5-6
6-7 �6-7
�7-8
>8
15-0225
DATE 8/10/15
w .W,
g
V)
LLJ
O
Q r &
w.
LL] d (n V) J N O N M Ln 0 n n
o i
-j
LL
111111
C)
a
w W,
O
O O \0
cp
•
0
_m
e � -
.
•
P
LO
00
-- b -�
ljkl-
i " (oJJ 110 O
' rl
ry�!! M
N.
1-4
ON
A.
} C
Cb CL on
• _ 7
d � V
• O J J h * • E Ln Ln
0
od
-14 A
LiJ
W i
-fLC)
LLJ M Mfi q6ca
+�+. X
Lr; §
I
w0 OE Ln 0 "= L as
Aal
Lg, a
N N _
L L �
>ix
1
7 w
10
ixJ
r _ _
'n .
y z
-
.8L
K�
n
s
`.. . .
L L L
W w .,. I N
x
. Mo
zLl
o n L—
12"V U�� wzQw n `,
z
_
1� HG n� w��w
w
uj
a �
..
w
_ ' r,►UJ
I
N a m Q
cn
4LOw
zLf)(w w a
M
o
� w
O O
ra � b
J
i
OO I
„5 ��� LL
V)
•
I Y '
46
LO
1I�6
dp jJ
YG x
-
.
- `� •F� Allo � '
AL
Uj
r L I
LUr
,:� �. �, ,���. - • ;� � mow., . �". • � �
W �
f �
r
Al 1 p cn
z co co
Ld
Ld
t 6i 1 Ln Qn
O LU
�w a o a-
cn > O u7
— � O 77
LSi .o
,L
u
V)0MCO10 10 � � �� L
J J
- J
i
n n j '�"
- -- p
r 11.
1,
0 300 600 200
Feet
1 inch = 600 feet
r,"
F."
n Gr
Y
007
6
—4 1
EX FLOOD DEPTH < 0.5 FT
j, r
r
4117
m - --
T -F
_0
-6b /11
i F_
f
(PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
k
'�A 7A RIM EL = 634
d
7
EX FLOOD WSEL = 635.89
r
011011
JAI
EX FLOOD DEPTH 1.11 FT
0
5-6
7
6-ar
a.
A "
L
(PUMP #1) PARK DRIVE LOW C. TB. B.
P
h;
RIM EL. = 635.67
>8
owl'
rM
ru
e
r
46
EX FLOOD DEPTH 1.26 FT
2 r-
0 PUMP STATIONA
40,
IP
25YR 2HR STORM
(PUMP #2) N PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
r.
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
RIM EL. = 633.88
.1 10 11
0 1 -2
EX FLOOD WSEL = 633.34
02-3
—4 1
EX FLOOD DEPTH < 0.5 FT
j, r
r
4117
m - --
T -F
_0
-6b /11
i F_
f
(PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
k
'�A 7A RIM EL = 634
d
EX FLOOD WSEL = 635.89
r
011011
JAI
EX FLOOD DEPTH 1.11 FT
0
5-6
7
6-ar
a.
A "
7
(PUMP #1) PARK DRIVE LOW C. TB. B.
LEGEND
RIM EL. = 635.67
>8
EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.93
AT -RISK HOMES (7)
EX FLOOD DEPTH 1.26 FT
2 r-
0 PUMP STATIONA
17
IP
25YR 2HR STORM
r.
FLOOD DEPTH (FT)
0-1
0 1 -2
02-3
3-4
4"% t
:m b"b w 171k NL
4-5
b
5-6
7
6-ar
7-8
41
At
>8
71 4.
LEVEE 37
17
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE E N Gl N F—F, k I 'v G I TD
3 9575 Wasl Kqgoos Road. Suite 600 TITLE
Rosemont, Illinois 60018
{8 57) 823-0500
15-0225
DATE 9/16/15
0 300 600 1,200
44'
Feet
1 inch = 600 feet
L* r"�rCrtn.u.r
tr.
s•pz� I
r
rl
pp
6
10
J6 4-0-4
,
r
PL
Ir
'0-
vl
r
F6
0,
(PUMP #2) N PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
RIM EL. = 633.88
EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.46
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 2.58 FT
7
G
4ell
0
(PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
Y
RIM EL. = 634.78
d
4".
EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.82
ore,
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 2.04 FT
r
r
F- —17- i If . r r—
L
Yp
(PUMP #1) PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
RIM EL. = 635.67
EX FLOOD WSEL = 637.95 Yaa
EX FLOOD DEPTH = 2.28 FT
r
46
71
r
, r
'z
nw
7—
'71
Ilk CIO
PROJECT NO.
CHRISTOPHER 5. BURKE
SI 16� in, 51.
TITLE
Illific)Is 60018
15-0225
DATE 9/16/15
,
0 150 300 600:
PUMP #2 N PARK DRIVE LOW C
T"y
I I I I I I I I I
Feet ( ) C. B.
1 inch = 300 feet RIM EL. = 633.88 s" 48„
EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.46 ->-> . �. CP_
-
.m PR FLOOD WSEL = 634.37.x. ' `� ! ,'
M .. e
A _ 6 0:
'
6,
^
e% -6'X 5:5' RCBC_
e
6 + Jk
CN 'Almr
t-4 I 12r
_ T
PROPOSED STORM SEWER ON PARK DRIVE 0
N'1
'oe Lo
n, M
REPLACES EXISTING STORM SEWER
X
(PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.Lo
'
., RIM EL. = 634.78 "
EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.82Y
>o- > > '
�..6�� 1 i I PR FLOOD WSEL = 635.66M 36„ n
. > 60
> •Y
•Y
IV
N .ram..- '"
0
-'�.IN I"" 36, �. it -r-,. 36 IIS''-. - ,�
LL
or
-.
4_
PROPOSEE
1.E �� .1.,SEWER OU1
2
PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROVIDES wow
,* �, RELIEF TO EXISTING TRUNK SEWER."' -
Ch1
+ .
•
24'�. . �'15: 18" • cp,
rk
9
FwT � r
XL
Yw
—IF 71
IV—
,n
_3 615' �1 12,:
D--0-
> 4 cv >—'O.O�• >� > >�C~l��-O �> < <
a b M„b<—o1 12” 12" 12" 78,
m
WL
Ln
Ln
LO
W
# _
k _ +
' -,. {f �" 'fix- _, r� an
33 36" 24 r : �_, �� . •• • �.,,`"�
cc
PROPOSED STORM SEWER ON PARK DRIVE i
�
r '° __ REPLACES EXISTING STORM SEWER _
i • . 4'Ww,wuuu , n
n e
W.,
P
Y
1'�. I F
•
L8 110
PUMP #1
1`
-- � - ( ) PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
I rr n i n,".. °-- RIM EL. = 635.67 ti
a_
C EX FLOOD WSEL = 637.95
12r -
PR FLOOD WSEL = 634.85
a42�.
42
54' •54�
Pump Station #1
Pump Station #2
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Pump ID
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Existing Start
Elevation (ft)
Proposed Start
Elevation (ft)
P#2 SWP-1
8.5
631.25
629
P#2 SWP-2
8.5
632.25
630
P#2 SWP-3
8.5
633.25
631
Prop 1
110
-
629
Prop 2
1 110 1-
630
Prop 3
1 110 1
631
^
e% -6'X 5:5' RCBC_
e
6 + Jk
CN 'Almr
t-4 I 12r
_ T
PROPOSED STORM SEWER ON PARK DRIVE 0
N'1
'oe Lo
n, M
REPLACES EXISTING STORM SEWER
X
(PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.Lo
'
., RIM EL. = 634.78 "
EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.82Y
>o- > > '
�..6�� 1 i I PR FLOOD WSEL = 635.66M 36„ n
. > 60
> •Y
•Y
IV
N .ram..- '"
0
-'�.IN I"" 36, �. it -r-,. 36 IIS''-. - ,�
LL
or
-.
4_
PROPOSEE
1.E �� .1.,SEWER OU1
2
PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROVIDES wow
,* �, RELIEF TO EXISTING TRUNK SEWER."' -
Ch1
+ .
•
24'�. . �'15: 18" • cp,
rk
9
FwT � r
XL
Yw
—IF 71
IV—
,n
_3 615' �1 12,:
D--0-
> 4 cv >—'O.O�• >� > >�C~l��-O �> < <
a b M„b<—o1 12” 12" 12" 78,
m
WL
Ln
Ln
LO
W
# _
k _ +
' -,. {f �" 'fix- _, r� an
33 36" 24 r : �_, �� . •• • �.,,`"�
cc
PROPOSED STORM SEWER ON PARK DRIVE i
�
r '° __ REPLACES EXISTING STORM SEWER _
i • . 4'Ww,wuuu , n
n e
W.,
P
Y
1'�. I F
•
L8 110
PUMP #1
1`
-- � - ( ) PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
I rr n i n,".. °-- RIM EL. = 635.67 ti
a_
C EX FLOOD WSEL = 637.95
12r -
PR FLOOD WSEL = 634.85
a42�.
42
54' •54�
Pump Station #1
Pump ID
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Existing Start
Elevation (ft)
Proposed Start
Elevation (ft)
P#2 SWP-1
8.5
631.75
630
P#2 SWP-2
8.5
634
631
Prop 1
80
-
630
Prop 2
80
-
631
1.!:;1e To-77i�7*' 0-010"406- rrk
•
CHRISTOPHER U. BURR#
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
15-0225
3611
I'l
DATE 9/16/15
.
INSTALL 6 -INCH RESTRICTOR TO ALLOW
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
m x►IL�.
> > >
0 150 300 600
Proposed Start
Elevation (ft)
LOW FLOWS TO BYPASS AND HIGH FLOWS TO
INTO PROPOSED STORAGE AREAFeet
.r
rDRAIN �
.1
I i i
P#2 SWP-2
Q
-
,�„'�
630
1 inchfeet
8.5
m
W. Al"1
i
3I 00i
40
=
(PUMP #2) N PARK DRIVE LOW C. B.
co il
-
w o
"�
-
RIM EL. = 633.88
EX FLOOD WSEL
PR FLOOD WSEL
= 636.46
= 635.01
cp-�,
_•
ti
y^
.
Pump Station #2
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
m x►IL�.
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Existing Start
Elevation (ft)
Proposed Start
Elevation (ft)
P#2 SWP-1
8.5
631.25
629
P#2 SWP-2
PROPOSED STORAGE AT
-
,�„'�
630
ROBERT FROST ELEMENTARY
8.5
633.25
NWL = 632.5
HWL 639.2
111 IF
00.°
40
=
629
Prop 2
VOLUME = 18.0 AC -FT
-
'
Pro p 3
'
M.—
-v
I -.
y^
xs
5' X 5'RCBC y to
► n,: I
85' X'5'°RCBC,
O
Cn
12' ,
y ` +p
w �
d
N.
i� v
I •
• 1 g r
OFF
I � I _,v (PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C B.
y w RIM EL. = 634.78 M
6�'rt k(1', : � I EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.82 , '� - Ny 12.,
48”- 48 �,_� �8 >_ w v PR FLOOD WSEL = 636.36 ".,
..
o � > rr~
ryNo
FA16,4.^
y.
LEGEND "_ �. •w'� TM
INSTALL 12 -INCH RESTRICTOR TO ALLOW �� �,�•. ,�- �
' LOW FLOWS TO BYPASS AND HIGH FLOWS TO
®AT -RISK HOMES (2) BACK UP INTO PROPOSED STORAGE AREA
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
•.
Q PUMP STATION > > > > >
LEVEE 37 I ,�. �.»
:. „
OP WOMW6
o STORM MANHOLE
> STORM SEWER
25YR 2HR STORM
FLOOD DM -1
EPTH (FT)
u a �a�;_ 'k,1 �A
' a
6
,
fA
w
2-3ow
. • �m a +
3- 4 - .air++ j�•.
IF
0 4 - 5 36,1 �.� 3„19 15„ ._ 15" � 1 `t 15" • 7 5" f
5 - 6 —0 15" 12" (r!>—>O— >12" 12" _ 12" 12" 12" 78„
'I
!4 r
iyf r
t
24,E _ 24"'�.
,.. r 12 <<
III0 do
Oft 7
yi
°^
I ,
Ok
..,
8' Y
v
rPUMP #1 PARK DRIVE LOW C. B. o'
N 12w ' i 12"
�y RIM EL. = 635.67
0- EX FLOOD WSEL = 637.95
�-a
,. -
_ i
- � W. PR FLOOD WSEL 636.78
y_._..
ADDITIONAL SEWER REQUIRED _ i- `` i' ~ � •
TO REDUCE FLOODING 1 'v INSTALL 12" RESTRICTOR ON EXISTING I �-
o
- 0 54" STORM SEWER TO REDUCE FLOWS
TO PUMP STATION #1_
o ) '.
7g
y
i
,g,gplwd
1
Qw .
4° %: PROPOSED 54" STORM SEWER
I= ALLOWS FLOW TO BACKUP INTO o
STORAGE AREAAND THEN DRAINw -
•
54,, 1 r
��5„ FOLLOWING THE STORM EVENT
0Ln
* N Lr =
06 Ln
4 "
CO
• L
�n
PROPOSED STORAGE AT o
INDIAN GROVE ELEMENTARY
r NWL = 630.5
HWL = 638.2
' VOLUME = 12.0 AC -FTS _
CHRISTOPHER B. B! RKE
Vve,-,t 1-11G19 11 , RGiJi1, 'Slwe Li Yl) TITLE
Prar,e n c r1 tlllirnois 60018
■ (847182.-05001
Pump Station #1
Pump Station #2
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Pump ID
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Existing Start
Elevation (ft)
Proposed Start
Elevation (ft)
P#2 SWP-1
8.5
631.25
629
P#2 SWP-2
8.5
632.25
630
P#2 SWP-3
8.5
633.25
631
Prop 1
40
-
629
Prop 2
40
-
630
Pro p 3
40
-
631
xs
5' X 5'RCBC y to
► n,: I
85' X'5'°RCBC,
O
Cn
12' ,
y ` +p
w �
d
N.
i� v
I •
• 1 g r
OFF
I � I _,v (PUMP #2) S PARK DRIVE LOW C B.
y w RIM EL. = 634.78 M
6�'rt k(1', : � I EX FLOOD WSEL = 636.82 , '� - Ny 12.,
48”- 48 �,_� �8 >_ w v PR FLOOD WSEL = 636.36 ".,
..
o � > rr~
ryNo
FA16,4.^
y.
LEGEND "_ �. •w'� TM
INSTALL 12 -INCH RESTRICTOR TO ALLOW �� �,�•. ,�- �
' LOW FLOWS TO BYPASS AND HIGH FLOWS TO
®AT -RISK HOMES (2) BACK UP INTO PROPOSED STORAGE AREA
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
•.
Q PUMP STATION > > > > >
LEVEE 37 I ,�. �.»
:. „
OP WOMW6
o STORM MANHOLE
> STORM SEWER
25YR 2HR STORM
FLOOD DM -1
EPTH (FT)
u a �a�;_ 'k,1 �A
' a
6
,
fA
w
2-3ow
. • �m a +
3- 4 - .air++ j�•.
IF
0 4 - 5 36,1 �.� 3„19 15„ ._ 15" � 1 `t 15" • 7 5" f
5 - 6 —0 15" 12" (r!>—>O— >12" 12" _ 12" 12" 12" 78„
'I
!4 r
iyf r
t
24,E _ 24"'�.
,.. r 12 <<
III0 do
Oft 7
yi
°^
I ,
Ok
..,
8' Y
v
rPUMP #1 PARK DRIVE LOW C. B. o'
N 12w ' i 12"
�y RIM EL. = 635.67
0- EX FLOOD WSEL = 637.95
�-a
,. -
_ i
- � W. PR FLOOD WSEL 636.78
y_._..
ADDITIONAL SEWER REQUIRED _ i- `` i' ~ � •
TO REDUCE FLOODING 1 'v INSTALL 12" RESTRICTOR ON EXISTING I �-
o
- 0 54" STORM SEWER TO REDUCE FLOWS
TO PUMP STATION #1_
o ) '.
7g
y
i
,g,gplwd
1
Qw .
4° %: PROPOSED 54" STORM SEWER
I= ALLOWS FLOW TO BACKUP INTO o
STORAGE AREAAND THEN DRAINw -
•
54,, 1 r
��5„ FOLLOWING THE STORM EVENT
0Ln
* N Lr =
06 Ln
4 "
CO
• L
�n
PROPOSED STORAGE AT o
INDIAN GROVE ELEMENTARY
r NWL = 630.5
HWL = 638.2
' VOLUME = 12.0 AC -FTS _
CHRISTOPHER B. B! RKE
Vve,-,t 1-11G19 11 , RGiJi1, 'Slwe Li Yl) TITLE
Prar,e n c r1 tlllirnois 60018
■ (847182.-05001
Pump Station #1
Pump ID
Max Pumping
Rate (cfs)
Existing Start
Elevation (ft)
Proposed Start
Elevation (ft)
P#2 SWP-1
8.5
631.75
630
P#2 SWP-2
8.5
634
631
Prop 1
30
-
630
Prop 2
30
-
631
10' .•.
PROJECT NO.
'n
2' • A
27„
15-0225
DATE 9/16/15
Village of Mount Prospect — Levee 37 Drainage Study September 22, 2015
11
Appendix 1
Cost Estimates
3 hristoptw R. Burke Engineering Ltd.
0 0 0
LooO
rl_ CN
M qt 0
N Ili O
�
M O
{f} 69, �}
J
Z F-
0 LU 0
-
OWO
H (D
' Z Z
O
Cl) Zp
OL)
U �
Z
O
V
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
V
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
LUJ
�
0
0
m
J O
- O
o
�.
Q
m
co
o
C) C)
N
N
CD
a
0
0
r
LL
O
m
W °z
O
Z Lo
O
00
U H
Z CN
m'�o
C-0
aw
U) -)
a�
O CN
m=�
00
U)��
C
LLU� 4. a)
a. a
LU >
o
o�
4- �
Z W
z
Z LU Q
LLI
Lo U):)
� O
m
O m
OAU)
Z Q
Urn 0�
V
Q
W 0 -j
0 0 0
LooO
rl_ CN
M qt 0
N Ili O
�
M O
{f} 69, �}
J
Z F-
0 LU 0
-
OWO
H (D
' Z Z
O
Cl) Zp
OL)
U �
Z
O
V
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0)
o
C) C)
C)
8
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
Lo O
Lo
0
o
o
0
0
Lo
o 0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
V
O
r-- r`
r--
O
O
O
Ln
00
—
Q O
M
LO
O
O
o
0
0
J
00
M
4
4
N
r- N
f`
L6
O
M
O
O
H
69-
V> f}
{0}
61!>
60
f-
K}
{0}
60-
tq t}
t}
t}
t}
t}
t}
ff}
{f}
H
H
Z
Q
o
o
N
o ti
Lo
M p
o
Lt's
M
o
O
N
r
r
LO
00
r
o
r
o
r
Lf)
00 r
r
r
r
00
o
N
o
N
r
r
N
C/)
0
O
o
0 0
O O
Lo o
0
O
Lo
0
O
Lri
00
00
o
o
0
0
C)
0
0
o
0
0
L()
0 0
0 0
C) o
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
Lo
0
0
Lo
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
Oct
O
0
0
0
00
�lqt
0
0
0
CO
N
0
0
0
U
O
OO
Ln
000
Ln
000
O
44
N
O
M
O
z
D
~>->-O�>-
W
�
2
m����
m
m
m��
2
2i
m
Z
U
W O
W
O
O
D
Q
U
Q
O
O
O
O
O
O
O D
O Q
U
Q
U
Q
O
O
O>>
O��
U
Q
Q
U-
WWU-
U-
U-
U- WWWU-
U-
JJW
z
W
2
LU>
(D
z
z
U)
00
w
z
z
Z
3D
m
W
00
CO
L
U
CN
~
LU
>
LU
>o
m
J
~
U)
J
D
J
D
LU
cl
O
U
U
LU
X
X
<
Y
J
m
m
LL
2
Q
Q
O
O
N
O
X
m
zzEo
O
m
z
W
�
CO
W
CO
W
CO
I --W
cV
z
O
W
z
z
Cl)
Q
i
O
D
O
W
O
W
LUU
Q
U
J
U~C\l
a--
- W
oM Q
U
LU
LU LU
O
z
Y�
xx<
�
a-
0
ZC)Ct)
LLz
����0
C)
j<(D(DmU)»wcn
LuUC)
Lu
Q
0()
�
���m
zOCJQz
J�
LL—
0
�UXXUtn
D::)
WW
�
�
���UP-OwOJO
�WU
��
O'ZU
U
z
Z)
O
O
O
O
O
LU
LU
LU LU
U
J
z
O
z
p
O
Lu
m�
U~JJUW
W
W�C�C��QU�>
Lu
=J(DzzQac~n
U
O z
O—>>
Q
Cl)
2
cncn�zzzWUO_J
2
2 v>
>>—>—
0
z
w 0
w
m
O
0
U
E
E��
0
0
m
0
LL
cn
U
WOLWO
22w000W22
2QzX
(2
Q W�
(nWUOC�
O
WW
0-
P-
1 (n(ncoz��
P-
P J
W
W
O
UOC
W
O
Um
O
OLo
Ln
O
O
CM
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
O
0
Ln
0
O
0 0
O O
0
Ln
0
CO
0
O
Ln
H
O
O
00
d7
7
CD
O
0
(D
0
Ln
0
M
0
It
0
Ln
0
O
0
Ln
0
lzt N
O
0
O
0
�
M
N
�
f`
I--
`O
M
Q
W
O
00
O O
O
O
O
O
O
�
O
�
O
Q
O
O
O M
N
O
Ln
O
Ln
O
CU
O
M
O-
S
O
z
-
O
N
Lo
N N
Lo
N
It
�
0
U-)
0
U-)
�
LO
Lo
LO
LO
In
LO O
U') CO
O
co
O
(0
O
tD
CO
CD
O
f`
O
N
0 0 0
LooO
rl_ CN
M qt 0
N Ili O
�
M O
{f} 69, �}
J
Z F-
0 LU 0
-
OWO
H (D
' Z Z
O
Cl) Zp
OL)
U �
Z
O
V
O
Q
H
M
W
2
H
U
W
CL
co
O
a
0
LU
U)
O
M
a
w
Q
CL
N
O
Q
U)
2
D
LUN
H
Q
w
LUH
J
Q
0 0
6 6
N CN
0) LO
00 M
ti I,--
GO- 69- 69-
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
O
Ln
O
O
O
Ln O
Ln
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ln
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
V
N
I`
Ln
0
f- O
f`
N
0') LO
0
0
0
LO
0
00
O
rI:t
0
0
0
00
Ln
N
f�-
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
J
Q
N
N
It
r
� NI:t
ti
M ti
N�I:t
N
CA
00
r
Ln
O
f`
(o
d)
N
r
f`
LO
LO
O
O 00
O
N
O
N
H
O
r
~
Qf
69-6136c}69169-60-69-6}6}{f360-Q9-Q9�Q9�U}(P�U}
6}�}Ql�60-60-6e}V}()!}61!��}60-60.60-
61}{9}
_H
H
Q
O
ti
0
p
r
0
0
0 N
LnO
0
Ltd
0
N
0 O
(O t.-
O
N
r
r
O
00
�
p
r
O
O
p
r
O
00
r
r
r
r
r
p
0
N
0
O
r
r
r r
C%4
r
p
M
O1
07
r
N
N
N
O
0
o
O
0
o
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O O
0 0
Lf j o
O
0
Lo
O
00
o
O O
0
Lo CD
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
Lo
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
CD
O
0
66
O
0
O
0
o
O
0
6
O
0
6
O
0
o
O
0
6
O O
0 0
6 6
O
0
6
O
0
6
Q
Ln
O
LO
qqt
O
O
r 0
M
0
0
0
O
00
LO
rqzt
0
0
0
0
0
M
CO
N
0
0
0 0
0
0
U
O
N
O
r
O
O
Ln
LO
r
O
O
O
00
LO
0
0
0 0
0
0
O
r
O
r
I�t
mt
�
(.0
d)
N
LO
O
O 00
O
r
O
N
Z
D
LU
3:
w
mm�--
m
ZZUQUCoc)00aa0a0000<<<<<OOOWWWWaw
—�
O>->-El�>->-
O>->-
U
U
O
U
O
O
O
O
D
U
U
U
U
O
O
O
D
D
D D
U
D
D
D
Q
W
Q
U-
W
W
LL
W
LL
LL
LL
LL
w
w
w
w
w
LL
LL
U-
J
J
J J
W
J
Z
LU
2
LUa-
CD
z
-�
o
OO
m
U)
w
LU
zz
z
»wz
z
3
O
�
O
_
mw
m
�Q
-j
z
�Q0
C)
U)
Z
oo
CN
Z
0
�w
LU
w
0
~
LU
(n
O
LU
(n
O
m
m
J
Q
Q
J
(n
LU
U
U
w
U
U
w
w
Q
O
O
LU
X
OO
X
0
z
w
22D
w
Q
Cf)
LL
Yw
2
w
��
w
w
0
_z
J
Q
Q
U
�
Q
>
O
rNLo
O
O
X
LU
LL
rrp
��2
��
z
(D—
mz
Q
LU
W
�
Q
w
w
J
m
Cf)z�
Q
_
w
U=
(ncncnLL_N00
W
r
��Z
0
Z
QQJ�LL_
0wZU
Z
Q
O
LL
WCnw
X
W
D
LU
~
z
Lu
W
a_
W
0-
��0
m
m
U
w�
Q
>wz
U)
O
U)
W
U
N
~roO���U��
U
U
J�
-
www
w
��w��
(D
w
Z
D
Q
w
_
=_
UZ���oM��Q
X
O
Q
Q
J
J
Q
Q
CO
UUwO(D
w
w�
z
ZZ.�
_
0
O
Ln
Cn
z
Q
Q
p>
Z
m
U
0
C/)
w
Q
Q
C)
�
LL
Z
W
L~U
0
z=~
U
r
0
W
z
J
00
�
C/)
Q
m~~
>-
C�
z
C�
z
w
W
w
Q
Cn
Q
O
>>
O
_
Cfl
ti
w
Co
Q
U
Z-
Cn
w�
C�
D J
w
Z�
Q
�
C
<zJ=
Z
Q
J
OJ�ujC/jCOC/)
Q
U
W
w--�
0
-�
wLU
w
w
w
U)ZZWJ�
0
0
O
JzZ0
O
JJOLL�
Q
Q
y
Z
Z
C)Z:
Z U
U
W
W
Z-
LL
z���
C/)
W
W
W
0C
W
��
>->-
Q
�WUU�000z�Uw
Q
J
Z
Z
0
w
_Q Cn
>>
0O�QZ)
U
0
U�—aaoo0������;�;
0
���
~
w
W�
U
Z
O
O
zOzULuLU
Z
U
- X�
W
WO=J
0co�
(DzO
z<a-
J
J
wwwLUCl)
U)
CO
Lu
,_,�c�c���QUQ�
Z_Z_QQwUZ�ZJQ
>
UOzOw—
zm00000UEEEE__
>>QQ
O0
U)>>zz>—wUQDU
00mm0�
cn
Up
wwwzCnov
LU
w
w
w
a- w
0
0
Q
Q
w
w
0
0
0
0
z
z
w
2
2
2
Q
z
z z
X
z
ofof0�
���
0�QW��0
�CnWCnUUU
1-1
W0�0�
0-0-CnCOCnCn2i2iz
F--<QJww00wp[000OQ
E
I EUUE�2U2mJ
�$
0
r
0
0
0
0
0
L(7
Ln 0
r r
0
M
0
0
0 0
0 0
LC>
0
0
0
0
Ln
0
M
M
0
Ln
0
00
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
0
O
0
Ln
0
(D
0
O
0
O
0
r
0
0
0
0
00 "t
M N
r
0
Ln
0
N
r
r
O
Co r
r 0
O
0
r
0
Ln 0
O r
I`
r
MI-
0
0
Ln
0
O
M
O
O
�
O
Ln
O
t
r
CO
M�
:t
N
O
0
O
0
CO
M
r
M
N
r
f`
r
M
O
ti 0
M M
Q
Q
W
O
r
O
r
O
r
O
W
O O
r O
O
r
O
r
O O
O N
O
N
O
r
O
r
r
O
r
N
Q
0
Q
0
O
r
O
r
N
N
N
N
M
N
O
Ln
0
Ln
0
O
0
O
0
M
0
r
0
0
r M
0 0
Z
Z
—
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
r Ln
N N
Ln
N
00
N
��
� �
1:1'
0
Ln
0
Ln
i,;I-
Ln
Ln
U)
Lf)
Ln
L()
Ln
In
Ln
In
0
CO
0
O
0
O
0
Cfl
0
CO
0
(0
0
(D
co
C0
O
f`
Ln
M
O O
N N
0 0
6 6
N CN
0) LO
00 M
ti I,--
GO- 69- 69-
0 0 0
LOc)�o
N O M
O O (fl
ti M O
1- N
U!)- Ct3 60,
Q Z F-
0 w O
H (D
' Z Z
�F--O
U) Z �-
O U
U �
Z
O
U
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 LO
0
LO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LO
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0 0
O O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0 0
O O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
CO
Lo O
Lo
O
00 (o
CO
M
CA
Cr)
O
O
LO
LO
O
00
LO
M
'r-
qt
00
O
O
O
O
00 LO
CO
O
O
O O
O
0
0
0
J
Q
Lrj
7
i
00
1�
S
O O
O N
O
CO
M
00 CO
�
co-
��
N�
CA
00
O
MI:t
ti
ti
ti
O
O
N
ti
LO
LO LO
CA
O
N
N
S
O
O
~
61!}ff36436C}61!)-61!)-61!)-61!)-61!
)-60
60
ff3ff3Q}vl�vl�(pgtqq{�}�}Q}Q}6e}61!)-61!}61!�61!}61!)-61!}61!>tq
f}EF}
} }
}
}
}ff3
H
Ho
Z
O
O
000000000000
r�
O)
N
a)
r Li)
r
N
Ln
r
r
r
Ls)
00
r
r
0ou)0lno
r
1`
r
r
00
M
N
r
r
N
r r
000
N
O
O
r r
r
N
r
r
Q
r
1`
N
NT
M
M
r a)
r
N
0)
r
00
N
r
r
N
N
r
r
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O O
0 0
6 O
O
0
6
O
0
0
O O
0 0
0 1--
O
0
LCA
O
0
6
O
0
N
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
6
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O O
0 0
0 0
O
0
0
O
0
6
O
0
6
O O
0 0
0 0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
In
u»
I:t
O
CD
00
Cfl
O
O
O
O
O
CO
LO
N
�
ct
CO
O
O
0
0
0 0
M
M
N
O O
O
0
0
0
U
N
O
O
O
Ln
0
0
N
O
O
O
O
00 LO
O O
O
0
0
0
O
�Itt
't
00
00
O
N
N
LO Ln
O
O
N't
Z
}
}
}
}Q}Q}-6�t}}Q}60-6}Q}6c>V>
0}�}61!>V>{f}Q9-Q}09-t}�}ol�t}t}6}61!}61!}61!}Ef3E1!?EF}�}60,69-V}Q}
zzQDUCt)Uw0000000<<0aa000000aaaaaaOoowawaaw
-
U
U
OU-
U
U
O
D
U
o
0
0
0
0
0
U
U
U
U
U U
0
0
0
U
U
U
D
p
W
U
a
Co
co Co
co
LL
coco
W
W
LL
W
W
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
W
W
W
W
W W
LL
LL
LL
J W
1-TUILU
J
W
W
a
2
LU
J
>
0
O
U
Z
�
_
Z
Z
W
00
W
Z
Z
Z
J
DD
W
3:00t(0
CC)
O
ZZ
0
Z)
CO
Q11
CO
W
OJ
U
_Z
U)U)
ZZ
pp
C14
T--
,t
CN
U
p
00
co
~
JJ LU
LU
��
W
Oo
W
mma
2
�
w
2
U
U
U
U)
U
U)
J
U
J
U
w
w
w
a
�_
OJ
W
LU
Q z
O
O
z
z
2
2
~~
D
w
LL
U
tl �
J
m
m
W
O
W
p
w
w
W
W
a
L
a J
Q
>LU
O
N
O
X
2
2
LL
r
LL
r
p
w
N
m
z
Ww
w�
2
zzED<<
w
w
w
LL
LL
N
w
O
W
LU
>-
-i
Z
(D
(D
w
2
Z~
~
a
_
E 9
0
_
LU
LU�
W
W
�
O
z
a
z
a
Q
O
X
z
w
U)
p U)Lu Lu
LU
V
zUUJUU���-
p
p
LU
W
W
W
W
W
��
LU
0
w
��i co
co
J��
�LU
w
0
LU
����
W W
p
p
-
oM
-
~~LU
W
W
p
p
w
W
p
z
Q
Y
L)
U U
w
_
U
X
O
0---
aaaJJJaa
�
't
2
2<
U
Lu
U
Lu
O <
ZO
w
ppp
WU'
LO
1Z
z
a
Z Z
�
p
Z
w
�OOmppv)v)v)»>_,
CO
CO
O
U
U
U)U)ct)aaapp
LL
Z
��
J
OCA
p
Z
Q�00
00
C/)
C) C)
z
F--
W
W
aaa000
tioOW
���
wa
Lu
��UZo0oW
Lu
W
p
a
�UQw
3:
LL
CO
Z
Z
Z
0
J=
a
J
0
a
J
Z Z
w
2
m
n>
-j
Q
-
w
w
w
w��
U
U
J
U
J
U
J
U
w
w
W
!1
J
0_
m
U)
U
Z
U�
Z
w
a>
J
wzOU4m
J
Z
Z
U
J
J
Jp��CO
Q�aYz
�UwwwUO=XXULL
����>
U
ww
z__
zz������>->-Q
LL00cncnCn�����~ZUwOUOUwC
Qa
if LU
���
o��w
>
o��Q�
>
65
<0
Z
oO���LLoww
W
a
z
w
aoo���������v�v�
wwwwww��w
�U-oo_
z
zz
pz�-
LuzQ
Cl)
20XCoLL
WOW=
OZ0�<W
_�pp��Ytl
C)<<wnnnnnn
J
J
W
W
W
W
W
Www�C�C�C���Q�UWp>
�ZZ_Zaa
co
ULL
�?
�>
m
W
U
z
O
w
aaZQ
J
m
O
OU
a
a
aO
O
0
U__>zz>w
000m0LL=U)C)
0J
o
wwFzc)clCl)
>
Q22www000000zzw2
2 2�2
ZZXO�ww�wa-w0o��-
a
ofofa0�OW0
��w��cnwcna-a-pUcnU0�
000
Jww0Y0Y0Y�����PaaJwwwOOw0�a00Pw
D�0-0-a-cncncncocncn22zEE
E
I UUE�
12
1 Umcnc�
�$
O
O
0
O
0
O
In
LO O
O
CO
m
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O
0
N
CA
O
O
O
O
Lo
O
M
C)
Lo
O
0
LO
0
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0't
0
0
Ln
0
O"t
0
0 0
LO CD
0
O
0
O
Lo
�
O M
O O
00
O
O
N
-r--
�
0
0
CO
0
O
0
0
N N
0 0
N
0
LO
0
CD
0-
M
M
0
S
0
LO
0
Cfl
M
I`
M
O
0
r
0
N
0
LO
0
;tO��
't't
N
O
0
O O
0 0
W
M
A
Lo
N
�
1` N
� O
1`
M
a
a
a
w
0
�
0
0
N
0
M
0 0
O
0
0
�
0 0
M;t
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N-
0
0
�
�
O
�
N
-r-
N
Q
0
Q
0
Q
0
O
O
O
�
N
N
N
N
M
N
O
LO
O O
Ln Ln
O
O
O
CO
O
M
O N-
� 0
0
Z
Z
Z
-
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
LO
N N
Lo
N
00
N
N I N
rt
0
LO
0't
LO
LO
"t
LO
LO
Ln
Lo
Ln
Lo
Lo
Lo
Lo
LO
Lo
LO
Ln
LO
O
(D
O
(D
0
CO
0
CO
0 0
CO CO
0
CD
0
CD
M
CO
O CD
I` X
O
N
0 0 0
LOc)�o
N O M
O O (fl
ti M O
1- N
U!)- Ct3 60,
Q Z F-
0 w O
H (D
' Z Z
�F--O
U) Z �-
O U
U �
Z
O
U
a
0 0 0
O N N
co f` co
Co � 00
CCN co OMO
V} {f} {f}
J
~Z F -
0 w O
(D F-
' z Z
�F-O
U)Zp
O C)
U �
Z
O
U
Q
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
o
o
C)
C)
C)
C) o
C)
C)
o C)
o
C)
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
o
CD
o
0
0
O
LO
O
LO
0 0
0
0
0 0
Lr)
LI)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C)
O
f`
f`
f`
O O
O
O
LI) 00
N
-r-
O�
O
00
LCA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
a
N
N
CO 00
N
I:t
�
N
O')
f�-
co
f`
N
f`
Lr)
00
I:t
0
I:t
0
�
0
N
O
H
vl{Q9-
f}Q}V}V>(}gtqg64>61}{f}{f}6e}6e}60-61!�60-
63�}f0.619-
6e>
F -
p
H
Z
Q
O
Ln
Ln
O
LC)
M
ti
O
p
0
Lo
M
0 0
O LO
N M
r
r
Lf) O
00 r
r
Lf)
r
M
0
r
0
0
r
Lf)
00
r
r
r
r
O
O
N
O
O
N
r
r
N
N
N
C'1
U)
O
0
o
O
0
LO
O
0
o
O
0
LO
O O
0 0
LO o
O
0
C)
O
0
C)
O O
0 0
C) o
O
0
C)
O
0
LO
O
0
o
O
0
0
O
0
6
O
0
66
O
0
00
00
gyri
LC)
O
0
C;
O
0
o
O
0
C;
O
0
o
O
0
6
O
-t
O
� 00
0
0
0 00
Lid
—
N
It
0
0
0
CO
N
O
O
O
O
O
U
O
OOLr)
000
LO
00000
O
It:i
It:i
N
00
T-
qzt
O
N
Lr)
O
T-
Z
~>->-D�>-
W
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
U
w
U
w
O>-
O o
U
Q
U
Q
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Q
O
Q
O
Q
O
O
O>>
O
w
w
U
Q
O
Q
U
Q
Q
LL cn
W
W
LL LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
W
W
W
LL
LL
J
J
W
W
W
Z
W
2
LU>
U'
Z
Z
_z
00
W
U
U
CD
Z
Z
Z
D
D
F-
00
W
F-
0
QLU
F-
U
�
�
N
~
LU
LU
»
(J
~>
J
J
D
U
D
U
LU
a
O
LU
X
00
X
F
j
LL
v
_
J
m
m
LL
Q
N
Lo
�
2
m
O
O
O
X
Z)
w
O
z
0
zzED
J
Om
LL
F—
W
Q�
CO
W
CO
WF
CO CV
p
co
z
Wco
p
w
Z
W
Cf)
U??
LU z>
w
w
N
w
O
Q
m
i
O
U
Q
W
U
F -F
-°p::)::)
o2
Ld
Z)wF
LU
U
F-
Q
Y
(D >�LU
X Q
F-
Q
N_
It
w
0
O
0
�Q�c�C�mcncn»>
(f)
J
J
J��LL
z
cn
w�o�Q
(n
F-
m
Q
z
m
z
z
w
0
0
0
D
LU
J=
Q
�
m F—
Cn�
���
J
WUU111
J
222
m
U
W
p�
Q�_
U
z
J
LL—
U)
0
�
F—
D w--
U=XXUCnCn
i�
mwzWJJ
U
W
O
U��Z�—U
w
0
z
(�Z
z
0
U�
ZZ0LLLLOW
W
W
W
W
WUZ00Z�(_)�2
m
LL
00
�
O
O
U W
W
W
W
I
>-
(D
�
Q
OU
Z)�
w>
=
J
O
z
z O
Q
Q
C j cn
Cn
Cn
Cn
Cn
Z
Z
z
W
U
W
J
UOz
zCno�m(nOOU
—(n>>Q
Cn>>—>LL
OOm0LLCn�OU
>
Lu
a-
w
O
Q
w 0
0
0
0
0
W
22
2
2
Q
z
O
2
X
of 1 �--
IO
�
W�
cn
W
O J
U U��
W
W�
a_ Cn
Cn
���
Cn
C n
C n
z
z��
W
W
O
U0�
W
of
I F-
O
I U
C n0�
w
O
I m
O
LC)
Ln
0
0
M
0 f�-
C) 't
0
0
0
0
Ln 0
0 Lr)
0
M
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
Ln
0
CD
O
O,
Ln
O
O
00
m
O
CO
�
0
CO
0
Lr) I`
0 X
C'M
0
�
0
Lr) O
0 0
qqt
0
Ln
0
N
R:t
N
Nt
O
0
O
0
Lr)
N
�
�
M
Q
Q
Q
W
O
00
O
O
O
O
O O
O N
O
�
O,
�
Q
0 0
Q
C)
O
O
�
O
M
N
O
Ln
O
Ln
O
Cfl
O
M
O—
S
O
Z
Z
Z
—
O
N
N
Lr)
N
Lr)
N
��
� �
0
LO
0
Lr)
� Lr)
Lr) Lo
Lr)
Lo
Lr)
LO
Lr)
LO
Lr)
LO
O
CD
O
CD
O
CD
O
CD
MO
CD
ti
O
N
0 0 0
O N N
co f` co
Co � 00
CCN co OMO
V} {f} {f}
J
~Z F -
0 w O
(D F-
' z Z
�F-O
U)Zp
O C)
U �
Z
O
U
Q
W
Q
O
a
w
F-
M
0
LU
O
M
O
a
06
LU
0
a
0
a
D
r
z
O
F-
F -
U) H
a
LU
co
a
w
LUH
J
Q
0 0 0
N N LO
(D O LO
O
M CY) M
CY) T--
T --
U!3 60- {f}
J
Z F-
0 w O
H O
' Z z
�F:O
yzp
OL)
U
Z
O
U
O
O
O
o
O
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
o
C)
0
C)
0
C)
0
C)
0
C) C)
0 0
C)
0
o
0
C) C)
0 LO
C)
0
C)
0
C)
0
C)
0
C)
0
C)
0
Lo
I`
C)
0
CD
0
CD
0
CD
0
CD
0
CD
0
CD
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
U
Lo
O
O
O
Lo O
Lo
0�t
I`
CD
�t
O
N
O
O
M
I`
0
0
0
0
CD
N
O
Lo
O
Lo
O
J
a
O�
00
Ln
�
co-�
CO �
C'M
CO
�
co
O
N
�
M
LO
CO
M
Ln
N
N
M
�
I`
I`
CO
O
N
(N
LO
O
~
{f}
ff3
ff3
V}
69- 69-
60-
69-
K} �}
613
{f}
{f}
60,
6}
Q}
(}q
tq
6q
K)
{vl
{Q}
ff3
�}
61!>
61!>
61!>
(Y) -
_H
~
Z
a
0
M
It
O
Ln
0
LO
M(
o
I,*- r
o
tiLr)
CD
0
0 0
O Lo
N
0
41
N
o
O
N
o
0
N
0
N
o
r
00
o
O
N
LO
M
r
0
W
N
0
0
N
U
r
co
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O O
0 0
Ln O
O
0
Ln
O
0
O
O O
0 0
I�
O
0
O
0
N
O
0
O
O
0
6666
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
6
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
66
O
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
O
O
0
O
0
U
Ln
LO
N
1:T
1:T
O
O
00
M
CD
O—
NqzT
0
000000
0
0
0
0
M
O
C)
O
LO
O
C)
O
LO
O
C)
O
CA
N
N
I`
M
O
N
N
Li)
Z
D
{!}
Q}
Q9-
V}
V} V}
{;}
tq
�}
�}
Ef}
K}
fe}
60-
60-
619-
61}
K}
K}
K}
K}
ff}
Q}
Q}
fl}
tq
tq
K}
F-
2
W
O
F
F-
F--
0�����
m
m
m
m
m
F
m
2
z
—
z
U
Q
D
U
0�>->-
c O
W
O
LL>-
O O
O
O
LL>-
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
D
Q
U
Q
U
Q
U
Q
U
Q
O>>
O
w
w
U
Q
U
Q
W
»WU
Q
���L-co0
LILILILLLwwwwwlL
J
Jww
J
C)
—
J
0
J
M
N
O
W
W
z
00
m
LU
2
U
U
~
W
Q
z
LLI
LLI
0
LU
��Q
Q
000
Q
LUa
��
LU
Q
a
>O
V--
LL
V --p
z
~W
LU
—>W,p
�j
2
=
CN
=
Lu
�
��w
�
J
O
C)
z0
U)
LU
��OC
0
0(nJw
UCN
�
a~
���
U)
~U
Www0�
��
Q
z
����ticy)
W
tl
W
tl
LU
LU
W�
LLI
LUco
-iO Q
Q
J
0-
zC)C)
Z
Z
>QQJJJQQ
w
N
M
�W0
Z
U0
�U�
m0C0
o
z
�OO�Q
m
v
U
>-cncn»>��rcncn�z�awQ
0
0
0
0
0
W
w
Q
—
<
O
CA
Z
Z
Q
J
z
W
m
J�
Q
�UU
J
J
Q
Q
J
m
U
Z
Q
J
Q
=
U
�
O
cDZ�J�
�W
P-22>�2_0
W W��W����W
W
W�0=
U
OOJZZW
Z
LU
cn
Q�aYZ
>
Q
U
p
U
U
p
w
w
sof
w
w
w
w
�az_U�z0
W
U
z
00
z
U
cn
OC
O��QZ)
�0XCo
L
oo��Y�wwwwwU
�a������;�;w
LU
LU
��w�
z
x
W
W
O
W=
J ('�
Z
o
Z
i�
Z Q
Q
zQ
J
0
Cl)
2222�O0co>>zLL
(n
(n
Cl)
(n
J
J
_Z
Z
Q
U
W
>cn
Q
ww�zcnocnF-FWm5
=U0z
mm
o
o
m
Q
0
2
LU
of
��w
w
of
0
Q�
w-
w
O W�
wwa_a_000nUCnCnCncocn22ZEEU�UCnCCJ
o
of
0
0
0—
Q
J
0
0
0
0
-�
0
z
Q
z
Q
J
w
w
0�
Z
O
w
Q
�$
0
0
0
0
0
0
In
Ln 0
� �
0
M
0
0
0 0
0 Co
0
0
0
0
I`
'�I-
0
Ln
0
M
0
O
0
O
0
0�
CD
m
CD
0
CD
0
';I-
0
In
0
O
0
O
M
M
2
O
N
�
�
0
0
CD �
� 0
Cfl
0
N
0
N N
O O
Ln
O
CD
O
I`
r
CD
0
't
0
I`
0
M
Ln
,"t
'-t
'-t
N
O
0
O
0
M
M
I`
r-
I--
`2
M
0
0
0
LJJ
O
O
O
N
O
M
O O
O—
O
O
M;I-
O O
0
O
0
O
0
O
N
Q
O
Q
O
O
�
O
�
O
N
N
N
N
M
N
O
Ln
O
Ln
O
co
O—
�
O
Z
Z
Z
—
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
In
N N
In
N
N
,i -In
N
In
Ln
L(-)
In
Lf-)
In
Lf-)
Ln
U-)
0
CD
0
co
0
co
0
co
0
co
0
co
0
I`
0
N
0 0 0
N N LO
(D O LO
O
M CY) M
CY) T--
T --
U!3 60- {f}
J
Z F-
0 w O
H O
' Z z
�F:O
yzp
OL)
U
Z
O
U
CO
H
Z
W
2
W
O
a
LU
LU
O
H
LU
U)
O
M
O
a
06
LU
0
a
a
r
Z
O
F-
F -
U) F-
a
a
LU
Q
w
LUH
J
Q
0 0
rn
� O
C4
N
60, {f} {f}
J
Z F-
0 LU 0
-
0LU0
H (D
' Z Z
�F-O
�Z-
OL)
U �
Z
O
U
LU
_z
O
J
O
LLLU2
W
0
J
C)
0
U)
LUO
0
LUQ
LU
2
CO
Qw
LL >-
O z
O
CD U
0
O cn
t=
Z �
W LLI�
2 a-
cnw�
O
°w0
ULL LL
O O
0 z z
JLL, 00
>- L
DQQ
Z
LU2
LUU
J
W
0
a
J
2
LULUU
w
LL
J
J
O
0
LL
z
CO
w
LU0
Q
QmUoLULL
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
�
o
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0 0
O O
0
O
0
O
ori 0
N O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V
O
O
O
N
O N
O
O
CO LO
0
CO
O
co
N
CO
O
O
CO
X
0
0
N
O
J
Q
O
7
CO
N
D N
00
M
N
-
N
CO
CO
N
I
O
�
M
00
O
�
N
M
CO
O
C`M
O
H
K}{f}ff3Q9�Q9�Q9�e}e}K}V}f!)
69-
f36c}69161!)-61!)-60�-64}6}6}{f}61!}6}
F-
P:
H
Z
o
O
W
0
O
o
OO
r o
0
o
O
o
O
o 0
ti O
0
O
0
1`
0
0
0
1`
0
O
0
g
N
M
N
M
0
o
r
ti
r
CQ
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O O
0 0
0 0
O
0
0
O
0
ti
O O
0 0
O O
O
0
N
O
0
O
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
OLnLOI:t
O
00
00
00
CF)
0000MOr`O
U
N
O
000000
O
O
O
�
LO
CO
M
Z
D
=
LU
0
2
2
2
2
0
z
—
z
U
Q
U
cn
0�>->-
U w
O
LL>
o
- O
o O
LL>
o
-
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
D
Q
U
Q
U
Q
U
Q
O
O
D>
w
-
O
D
w
»w
Q
cncocnLLcr)cnLLLLLLLLwwwwU-
Jc
J
0
_
ULU
J
0
J
Z
Cl)
Z
N
O
O
J
LU
a-
Cfl
z
U
O
ao
w
LULU
LU
LU
LU
Qz
V
<
LL
<
LL
>
�Y
V-�
Q
Q
O
LULU
�
D
LU
~
w
Q
-
-
~
~
OLu
z
LU
>
�
W
0
_�
V --Q
lqt
N
LU
LU
OZ
w
o
OcnJw
wLLJ
z
LU
LULU
Q�>
�w�
U
LU
LU
D
�w
��
z
Q
zzz
>
_
CV
X00
�n
UOQ
LU
a_
mz
Q
O
O
0
z
WQQQQ
ZCl)
w
0>
W
O
Q
m
U
U
z Q
m
J
Q
J
Q
J
O
O
W
W
w
J
Q
m
U
Q
E
Q>-
0
cOzJ=
_Z
J
J
Ozz
LULU
W
0
Q
>C
O
W
UULULU>
�0
�0
0-
0-
�M
O=zJ
00�
-j
�
LL
CO
�
zLULUQzwUwwwwzzaQzz=O
2
2
W
fn
fn
o�Q�
oUU�o�a����v,u,��o0��
Uoo>�YMW
W
W
WQQc�c��UQ�
2OmLL
w0=JCjzzzQQJocnwwwmmzzQUX�
U
z 0
0
0�
z
LUm�
Q
U
U
>>
00m
z--�
wwzU)C,
W
W
W
w
w 0
>
w
U)
a
Q
Q
2
2
2<
z
O
w 0
cn w
0
o
0
a-
EE O
0 U
9
cn
U
cn
cn
cn
co
U
U
w
of
w
2
0
U
00
z
U
�$
O
O
O
O
O
0
�
0 0
� M
0
0
O
0
O O
0 0
O
0
ti
I�t
O
O
O
N
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
O�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N
N
w
M
CD
N
�
�
O
CO
�
� O
0 0
N
0
N
O
N O
O O
CO
O-
ti
O
0
0
O
0
r`
0
N
0
W
M
O
O
O
O
W
M"t
ti
O
r --
M
LU
O
�
O
O
00
O
O O
O
O
M�
O
O O
0 0
O
0
O
N
Q
O
Q
O
O
0
0
N
0
N
0
O
0
O
0
CO
0
0
0
�
0
-
0
N
0
N
0
N
r
N
O O
N N
N
N
g
I�
O
O
O
O
LO
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 OF
0
0
0
0
ti
0
N
0
N
0 0
rn
� O
C4
N
60, {f} {f}
J
Z F-
0 LU 0
-
0LU0
H (D
' Z Z
�F-O
�Z-
OL)
U �
Z
O
U
LU
_z
O
J
O
LLLU2
W
0
J
C)
0
U)
LUO
0
LUQ
LU
2
CO
Qw
LL >-
O z
O
CD U
0
O cn
t=
Z �
W LLI�
2 a-
cnw�
O
°w0
ULL LL
O O
0 z z
JLL, 00
>- L
DQQ
Z
LU2
LUU
J
W
0
a
J
2
LULUU
w
LL
J
J
O
0
LL
z
CO
w
LU0
Q
QmUoLULL
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.
9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 600
Rosemont, IL 60018
MOUNT PROSPECT
(CBBEL PROJECT NO. 150225)
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
DATE: September 15, 2015
LAST REVISED:
ALTERNATIVE 8: 25 -YEAR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVE WITHOUT TAILWATER & PUMPS'
ITEM #
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT COST
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST
20100110
TREE REMOVAL (6 TO 15 UNITS DIAMETER)
UNIT
$
50.00
100
$ 5,000.00
20101200
TREE ROOT PRUNING
EACH
$
250.00
20
$ 5,000.00
20800150
TRENCH BACKFILL
CY
$
40.00
7000
$ 280,000.00
21101615
TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE, 4"
SY
$
5.00
1300
$ 6,500.00
25000110
SEEDING
ACRE
$
10,000.00
0.27
$ 2,700.00
25100630
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SY
$
5.00
1300
$ 6,500.00
42300200
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, 6 INCH
SQ YD
$
80.00
200
$ 16,000.00
42400200
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5 INCH
SQ FT
$
7.00
1000
$ 7,000.00
44000200
DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVAL
SQ YD
$
15.00
400
$ 6,000.00
44000500
COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL
FOOT
$
15.00
1520
$ 22,800.00
44000600
SIDEWALK REMOVAL
SQ FT
$
2.00
1000
$ 2,000.00
44201747
CLASS D PATCHES, TYPE IV, 8 INCH
SQ YD
$
80.00
5100
$ 408,000.00
50100300
REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES NO. 1 BOX CULVERT INTO JUNCTION
EACH
$
4,000.00
1
$ 4,000.00
50100400
REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES NO. 2 BOX CULVERT INTO JUNCTION
EACH
$
4,000.00
1
$ 4,000.00
54010505
PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS 5'X 5'
FOOT
$
500.00
85
$ 42,500.00
54010606
PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS 6'X 5.5'
FOOT
$
600.00
100
$ 60,000.00
550A0050 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 12"
FOOT
$
75.00
100
$ 7,500.00
550A0120 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 24"
FOOT
$
100.00
605
$ 60,500.00
550A0140 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 30"
FOOT
$
130.00
800
$ 104,000.00
550A0160 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 36"
FOOT
$
140.00
4186
$ 586,040.00
550A0180 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 42"
FOOT
$
160.00
2120
$ 339,200.00
55100500
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 12"
FOOT
$
15.00
690
$ 10,350.00
55100700
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 15"
FOOT
$
15.00
240
$ 3,600.00
55100900
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 18"
FOOT
$
15.00
330
$ 4,950.00
55101200
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 24"
FOOT
$
20.00
150
$ 3,000.00
55101400
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 30"
FOOT
$
40.00
185
$ 7,400.00
60203805
CATCH BASINS, TYPE A, 5 -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, OPEN LID
EACH
$
5,000.00
5
$ 25,000.00
60221100
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 5 -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$
4,500.00
8
$ 36,000.00
60223800
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 6' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$
6,500.00
6
$ 39,000.00
60224446
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 7' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$
9,000.00
15
$ 135,000.00
60224459
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 8' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$
10,000.00
1
$ 10,000.00
60224469
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 9' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$
12,000.00
1
$ 12,000.00
60234200
INLETS, TYPE A, TYPE 1 FRAME, OPEN LID
EACH
$
2,000.00
6
$ 12,000.00
60500040
REMOVING MANHOLES
EACH
$
800.00
6
$ 4,800.00
60500050
REMOVING CATCH BASINS
EACH
$
800.00
5
$ 4,000.00
60500060
REMOVING INLETS
EACH
$
500.00
6
$ 3,000.00
60603800
COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12
FOOT
$
30.00
300
$ 9,000.00
60605100
COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.24 ABUTTING EXISTING PAVEMENT
FOOT
$
35.00
1220
$ 42,700.00
63301215
REMOVE AND REERECT STEEL PLATE BEAM GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
FOOT
$
25.00
200
$ 5,000.00
70101700
TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION
L. SUM
$
50,000.00
1
$ 50,000.00
Z0004522
HOT -MIX ASPHALT DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, 6"
SQ YD
$
70.00
200
$ 14,000.00
Z0013798
CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT
L. SUM
$
20,000.00
1
$ 20,000.00
NA
STORM JUNCTION CHAMBER
EACH
$
20,000.00
5
$ 100,000.00
NA
REMOVE EXISTING JUCTION CHAMBER
EACH
$
5,000.00
5
$ 25,000.00
NA
BOX CULVERT CONNECTION TO EXISTING BACKFLOW STRUCTURE
EACH
$
10,000.00
2
$ 20,000.00
NA
UTILITY RELOCATION
L. SUM
$1,000,000.00
1
is 1,000,000.00
SUB -TOTAL $ 3,571,040.00
20% CONTINGENCY $ 714,208.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 4,285,248.00
'Does not include pump station cost
zBased on 2015 dollar estimates
3An allowance has been included for utility relocations, but the amount is not an upper limit
THIS ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
A. LAND ACQUISITION
B. ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY
C. ACQUISITION OF IDOT PERMITS OR COUNTY PERMITS
D. FENCE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT
E. IMPACT TO THE EXISTING FLOODWALL
N:\MOUNTPROSPECT\150225\Civil\Spreadsheets\EOPC 150225 25YEARIMPROVEMENT
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.
9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 600
Rosemont, IL 60018
MOUNT PROSPECT
(CBBEL PROJECT NO. 150225)
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
DATE: September 18, 2015
LAST REVISED:
ALTERNATIVE 9:25 -YEAR STORM SEWER AND FLOOD STORAGE IMPROVEMENT WITH 10 -YEAR FIS TAILWATER & UPGRADED PUMP STATION
ITEM #
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT COST
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST
20100110
TREE REMOVAL 6 TO 15 UNITS DIAMETER
UNIT
$ 50.00
130
$ 6,500.00
20101200
TREE ROOT PRUNING
EACH
$ 250.00
10
$ 2,500.00
20200100
EARTH EXCAVATION
CU YD
$ 40.00
62500
$ 2,500,000.00
20800150
TRENCH BACKFILL
CY
$ 40.00
1390
$ 55,600.00
21101615
TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE, 4"
SY
$ 5.00
30150
$ 150,750.00
25000110
SEEDING
ACRE
$ 10,000.00
4.2
$ 42,000.00
25100630
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
SY
$ 5.00
30150
$ 150,750.00
28100109
STONE RIPRAP, CLASS A5
SQ YD
$ 60.00
100
$ 6,000.00
42300200
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT, 6 INCH
SQ YD
$ 80.00
160
$ 12,800.00
42400200
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5 INCH
SQ FT
$ 7.00
1150
$ 8,050.00
44000200
DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVAL
SQ YD
$ 15.00
160
$ 2,400.00
44000500
COMBINATION CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL
FOOT
$ 15.00
500
$ 7,500.00
44000600
SIDEWALK REMOVAL
SQ FT
$ 2.00
1150
$ 2,300.00
44201747
CLASS D PATCHES, TYPE IV, 8 INCH
SQ YD
$ 80.00
1215
$ 97,200.00
50100300
REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES NO. 1 (BOX CULVERT INTO JUNCTION)
EACH
$ 4,000.00
1
$ 4,000.00
50100400
REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURES NO. 2 (BOX CULVERT INTO JUNCTION)
EACH
$ 4,000.00
1
$ 4,000.00
54010505
PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS 5'X 5'
FOOT
$ 500.00
185
$ 92,500.00
54213693
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FLARED END SECTIONS 48"
EACH
$ 4,500.00
1
$ 4,500.00
54213705
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FLARED END SECTIONS 60"
EACH
$ 8,000.00
1
$ 8,000.00
550A0050 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 12"
FOOT
$ 80.00
30
$ 2,400.00
550A0120 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 24"
FOOT
$ 100.00
520
$ 52,000.00
550A0140 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 30"
FOOT
$ 130.00
680
$ 88,400.00
550A0190 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 48"
FOOT
$ 150.00
750
$ 112,500.00
550A0210 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 60"
FOOT
$ 220.00
215
$ 47,300.00
550A0490 STORM SEWERS, CLASS A, TYPE 2 54"
FOOT
$ 190.00
810
$ 153,900.00
55100500
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 12"
FOOT
$ 15.00
10
$ 150.00
55100700
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 15"
FOOT
$ 15.00
200
$ 3,000.00
55101300
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 27"
FOOT
$ 25.00
135
$ 3,375.00
55101400
STORM SEWER REMOVAL 30"
FOOT
$ 40.00
185
$ 7,400.00
55101500 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 33"
FOOT
$ 45.00
260
$ 11,700.00
55101900 STORM SEWER REMOVAL 48"
FOOT
$ 60.00
130
$ 7,800.00
60221100
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 5' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$ 4,500.00
2
$ 9,000.00
60223800
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 6' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$ 6,500.00
3
$ 19,500.00
60224446
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 7' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$ 8,000.00
7
$ 56,000.00
60224459
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 8' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$ 10,000.00
1
$ 10,000.00
60224469
MANHOLES, TYPE A, 9' -DIAMETER, TYPE 1 FRAME, CLOSED LID
EACH
$ 12,000.00
1
$ 12,000.00
60234200
INLETS, TYPE A, TYPE 1 FRAME, OPEN LID
EACH
$ 2,000.00
2
$ 4,000.00
60500040
REMOVING MANHOLES
EACH
$ 2,000.00
5
$ 10,000.00
60500050
REMOVING CATCH BASINS
EACH
$ 800.00
3
$ 2,400.00
60500060
REMOVING INLETS
EACH
$ 500.00
1
$ 500.00
60603800
COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12
FOOT
$ 30.00
300
$ 9,000.00
60605100
COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.24 (ABUTTING EXISTING PAVEMENT)
FOOT
$ 35.00
200
$ 7,000.00
63301215
REMOVE AND REERECT STEEL PLATE BEAM GUARDRAIL, TYPE B
FOOT
$ 25.00
200
$ 5,000.00
70101700 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION
L. SUM
$ 22,000.00
1
$ 22,000.00
X6020293 MANHOLES, TYPE A, 8' -DIAMETER, WITH 2 TYPE 1 FRAMES, CLOSED LID, RESTRICTOR PLATE
EACH
$ 15,000.00
1
$ 15,000.00
Z0013798 CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT
L. SUM
$ 12,500.00
1
$ 12,500.00
NA
STORM JUNCTION CHAMBER WITH RESTRICTOR
EACH
$ 20,000.00
1
$ 20,000.00
NA
REMOVE EXISTING RESTRICTOR STRUCTURE
EACH
$ 2,500.00
1
$ 2,500.00
NA
LANDSCAPE RESTORATION (PLAYGROUND AREA)
L. SUM
$ 5,000.00
1
$ 5,000.00
NA
BOX CULVERT CONNECTION TO EXISTING BACKFLOW STRUCTURE
EACH
$ 10,000.00
2
$ 20,000.00
NA
STORM JUNCTION CHAMBER
EACH
1 $ 12,000.00 1
1
$ 12,000.00
NA
REMOVE BASEBALL FIELD EQUIPMENT
L. SUM
1 $ 4,000.00 1
1
$ 4,000.00
SUB -TOTAL $ 3,904,675.00
20% CONTINGENCY $ 780,935.00
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $ 4,685,610.00
'Does not include pump station cost (See Report Table 7)
2Based on 2015 dollar estimates
THIS ESTIMATE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
A. LAND ACQUISITION
B. UTILITY RELOCATIONS
C. ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY
D. ACQUISITION OF IDOT PERMITS OR COUNTY PERMITS
E. FENCE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT
F. IMPACT TO THE EXISTING FLOODWALL
N:\MOUNTPROSPECT\150225\Civil\Spreadsheets\EOPC 150225 Alt9.xlsx
LLQ+ DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
d e CHICAGO DISTRICT, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
111 NORTH CANAL STREET
4 CHICAGO IL 60606-7206
December 23, 2016
Rick Gosch, P.E.
Chief, Engineering Studies Section Office of Water Resources
Department of Natural Resources
One Natural Resources Way
Springfield, IL 62702
Subject: Upper Des Plaines River (Phase I) Construction Funding
Dear Mr. Gosch,
The current total Federal Allocation for Des Plaines I is $40,435,291.00.
Based on work-in kind(WIK) documentation provided, $2,971,130.18 is needed
to match the federal allocation (See attached — Des Plaines I Cost Share Analysis).
We will also work with IDNR to finalize LERRD credit accounting for Levee 50
and Levee 37. This is the initial phase of final accounting and further questions
may arise during the review of WIK documentation. My initial finding is that the
submitted WIK is integral to the project and should be credited as part of the 35%
cost share requirement.
Please provide the amount $2,971,130.18 via EFT or check made out to "FAO,
USAED, Chicago District". Directions for EFT are also attached to this letter.
Once received and entered into our system this amount will be reflected in future
financial reports.
If you have any questions or issues, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(312) 846-5558 or via e-mail.
Sincerely,
Digitally signed by
ZUERCHER.JEFFR ZUERCHER.JEFFREY.K.1246232853
DN: c=US. o=U.S. Government,
EY.K.1 24623 con=ZDUEDRCHER JEFFREY K..1,246232853
Date: 2016.12.21 15:18:36 -06'00'
Jeffrey K. Zuercher, P.E., PMP
Proj ect Manager
Enclosure
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Professional Services /
Phase 2 Storm Sewer Design Engineering
Levee 37 Landside Storm Sewer Improvements
August 25, 2017
Summary
The Village of Mount Prospect (Village) is seeking proposals from qualified civil
engineering consultants to prepare plans, specifications, and bid documents for the
construction of storm sewers and stormwater detention facilities to serve portions of the
Brickman Manor and Woodview Manor residential subdivisions in northeast Mount
Prospect, Illinois. The proposed improvements will replace and supplement existing
stormwater collection and conveyance systems that discharge to the Des Plaines River
via the Levee 37 floodwall system.
Desired services also include a high degree of communication and coordination with
varied and numerous stakeholders including residents, businesses, River Trails School
District 26, River Trails Park District, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Illinois
Department of Transportation, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Metropolitan
Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, United States Army Corps of Engineers,
City of Prospect Heights, and the Village of Mount Prospect.
Background
The Village website contains a link to a detailed flood study performed in 2015
(http://www.mountprospect.org/departments/public-works/levee-37-drainage-study). The
webpage and flood study document provide a thorough discussion of the project
background and examination of alternatives.
Problem Statement
The Village seeks a qualified Consultant to provide specified civil engineering services
necessary to design and let a storm sewer improvements construction bid. It is the
Village's intent to construct storm water collection, detention, and conveyance
system improvements that emulate the functionality described in Alternative 3 and
Alternative 6. Please note that the pump station modifications associated with
these improvements in the flood study document are specifically excluded from the
scope of work. The pump station modifications or additions will not be included in this
project.
Project Scope
The consultant will provide professional engineering services and provide, at a minimum,
the following:
Design/Bidding Phase
1. Collect necessary topography and necessary field data.
2. Prepare detailed plans and specifications suitable for bidding. Plans and
specifications shall conform to all current Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency and Standard Specifications for Water &
Sewer Main Construction in Illinois design criteria.
3. Consultant shall assist in securing necessary permissions, easements,
and/or rights to construct proposed improvements on property not under
the direct control of the Village. Assistance will, at a minimum, include
written and verbal communication, preparation of conceptual
presentations, and participation in at least two (2) staff level meetings and
two (2) public meetings with River Trails School District 26 and at least two
(2) staff level meetings and two (2) public meetings with River Trails Park
District.
4. Consultant will make application for and obtain all necessary permits,
easements, and/or permissions necessary to construct the proposed
improvements.
5. Consultant shall make recommendations to design, schedule, and/or
construct the proposed improvements in a manner that improves the
project's eligibility for third -party financial aid including grants and low-
interest loans. If recommendations are pursued, Consultant shall assist
the Village in making necessary applications for aid.
6. Consultant shall supply a detailed engineer's estimate of costs for
construction of the project.
7. Consultant shall submit all bid documents to the Village for review and
approval prior to distribution.
8. In addition to the necessary meetings and communication with Village staff
necessary to produce the final plans and specifications, the consultant shall
prepare presentations and participate in at least one (1) neighborhood
meeting and one (1) Village of Mount Prospect board meeting.
Proposed Project Schedule
Receive proposals for engineering services
September 19, 2017
Award contract for engineering services
October 3, 2017
Issue Notice to Proceed for engineering services
October 4, 2017
Pre -final construction plans andspecifications due
March 6, 2018
Final construction plans and specifications due
April 3, 2018
Technical Proposal
The Consultant's technical proposal shall be organized so that the outline generally follows
the format of this request for proposals. The proposal shall cover the approach and the
methodology the Consultant intends to use in carrying out the project. The technical
proposal should also include statements setting forth the Consultant's line of business,
organizational structure, summary of past experience, and specific descriptions of at least
three (3) projects completed in the Chicago metropolitan area that are similar in subject,
size, and complexity to the scope of services specified herein. Particular emphasis should
be placed on the Consultant's experience designing storm sewer system tributary to pump
stations as well as the Consultant's experience working with multiple units of government.
These descriptions must include contact information for reputable references that can
attest the Consultant's representations.
Cost Proposal
The consultant will quote a not -to -exceed price for each phase of the services described
under Scope of Services. Each price quote should include a breakdown by personnel
classification and estimated number of hours spent by each. Price proposals should be
submitted as a distinct document in a separate sealed envelope marked:
Cost Proposal for Engineering Services
Phase 2 Storm Sewer Design Engineering
Levee 37 Landside Storm Sewer Improvements
Present Work Load
A complete tabulation of the Consultant's current project workload is to be included. Each
project shall be identified by name, type, size, duration, and personnel assigned.
Personnel
Professional resumes, including education, work experience, professional credentials,
and employment status (e.g. full-time, part-time, years with the firm, job description) for
each individual to be assigned to the project described herein should be provided.
Disqualification of Proposals
More than one proposal for the same work described herein from an individual, firm or
partnership, a corporation or an association under the same or different names, will not
be considered. Reasonable grounds for believing that any party is interested in more than
one proposal for the work contemplated will cause the rejection of all proposals in which
said party is interested. If there are reasonable grounds for believing that collusion exists
among the parties submitting proposals, the proposals of the participants in such collusion
will not be considered.
Licenses
Each party submitting a proposal shall possess all necessary federal, state, and local
licenses as are required by law, and shall furnish satisfactory proof to the Village upon
request that the licenses are in effect during the entire period of the Contract.
Award of Contract
The award of any Contract may be made to the Consultant who submits the proposal
which is in the best interest of the Village as evaluated by Village staff. Such evaluations
will include the experience of the Consultant, capability of the Consultant, and other factors
deemed by Village staff to be in the best interest of the Village.
In addition, the Village reserves the rights to accept or reject any and all proposals, to
waive any informality in any proposals, and to accept any proposals considered
advantageous to the Village.
Proposals
Proposals should be addressed to:
Sean P. Dorsey
Director of Public Works
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1700 W. Central Rd., Mount Prospect, IL 60056.
Proposals can also be delivered via e-mail (sdorsey(cD-mountprospect-orq,). All proposals
should be clearly labeled in the following manner:
Proposal for Engineering Services
Phase 2 Storm Sewer Design Engineering
Levee 37 Landside Storm Sewer Improvements
Proposals due September 19, 2017
All proposals must be received at the
Mount Prospect Public Works facility no later than
12:00 PM local time on September 19, 2017.
EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL
A selection committee made up of Public Works and Finance Department staff members will
review each proposal. Each proposal will be rated and evaluated, applying the "Evaluation
Criteria and Weighting" described below.
EVALUATION CRITERIA AND WEIGHTING
1) Background of Firm/Background of Personnel
Criteria: Has the Project Manager worked on projects of similar scope and magnitude? Is the
PM qualified to manage all phases of the project and has appropriate professional background?
Has the Project Manager demonstrated ability in performing water and sewer rate studies in
similar scope? Does the support staff have extensive experience with related work? Is there an
appropriate mix of upper, middle and lower level staffing? Is there an appropriate mix of
professional and technical staff? Are all required disciplines identified for this scope of work? If
sub -consultants are proposed, have they worked with the consultant before? Have all team
members had similar experience regarding project scope and magnitude? Is the project team
located in the Chicago Metropolitan Area? If not, identify any additional expenses that will be
incurred as a result of this. Are resumes of all proposed staff included?
2) Related Project Experience
Criteria: Are similar and current (last 5 years) projects submitted as examples and references?
Are references positive? Are references current and accessible? Are the references from
Illinois communities? Does the consultant have municipal water and sewer rate analysis
experience?
3) Proposed Services
Criteria: Is a clear understanding of the project stated and demonstrated throughout? Is the
scope detailed and comprehensive? Is the scope consistent with the teaming and staffing
levels? Does the consultant suggest additional tasks that, based upon their experience, may
benefit the study but are not listed in the scope? How are these tasks identified? Is there a
demonstrated ability to add or reduce staff to reflect changes in scope, budget, or scheduling?
4) Proposed Schedule
Criteria: Does the proposed schedule coincide with the stated deliverable milestones? Is
adequate time allotted for each task? Is there a commitment to meet the VILLAGE'S schedule?
Are specific delivery dates identified for the milestones? Is the project schedule complete,
detailed and yet easy to understand? Does it match the scope and staffing levels?
5) Work Effort
Criteria: Are overhead rates given? Are man-hour estimates appropriate for the scope? Are the
tasks identified? Are man-hour estimates presented in the required format? Are man-hour
estimates given for each task? Are surcharges added to subconsultant fees? Are cost-saving
techniques presented? Are past examples of on-time on -budget performances demonstrated?
6) Proposal Content
Criteria: Is the proposal as brief as possible and devoid of excess promotional material? Does
the proposal indicate an innovative approach to project planning and execution? Does the
proposal present all the required material in a professional manner? Does the proposal address
all required submittals?
Consultant Statement of Qualifications Ranking Form
Project:
Consultant:
Submittal Date:
No.
Item
Score
1
Background of Firm / Background of Personnel (Max20points)
Comments / Notes:
0
2
Related Project Experience (Max 20 Points)
Comments / Notes:
0
3
Proposed Services (Max 25 points)
Comments / Notes:
0
4
Proposed Schedule (Max 15 points)
Comments / Notes:
0
5
Work Effort (Max 10 points)
Comments / Notes:
0
6
Proposal Content (Max 10 points)
Comments / Notes:
0
Tota 1
0
SUBMITTED TO:
SEAN P. DORSEY
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1700 W. CENTRAL ROAD
MOUNT PROSPECT, IL60056
SUBMITTED BY:
CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE, PHD, PE, D.WRE, DISTM.ASCE
CHRISTOPHER B. BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD.
9575 WEST HIGGINS ROAD ( SUITE 600
ROSEMONT, IL 60018
cburke@cbbel.com
WOomwoov'�
. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .iiiiiiiuiiii
iiiiiiiii C I� II �R II S � 0 F) IF II If IR IB � IB LJ IR II< IE IE IN Gi � N E E R � N Gi I L)
........................... �'1111'11111111111111111111
CHRISTOPHER B.BURKE ENGINEERING, LTD.
9575 West Higgins Road Suite 600 Rosemont, Illinois Von1a TEL (847) aca-ooVn FAX (w7)oxo-osun
September 19,2OC/
Mount Prospect Public Works Facility
170OVV.Central Road
Mount Prospect, iL 60056
Attention: Mr. Sean P. Dorsey, Director of Public Works
Subject: Request for Proposal for Professional Engineering Services
Levee 37Lands|de Storm Sewer Improvements
Phase 2 Storm Sewer Design Engineering
Dear Mr. Dorsey:
Christopher 8.Burke Engineering, Ltd. /CB8EUbpleased tosubmit our response toyour Request for
Proposals. We understand that the Village of Mount Prospect (Village) is seeking professional
engineering services to prepare plans, specifications and bid documents that conform to the
concepts depicted as Alternatives 3 and 6 in the 2015 Levee 37 Drainage Study posted on the
Village's website. Alternatives 3 and 6 show/ improvements at two elementary school sites that
drain to Levee 37 Pump Stations #1 and #2, and the Village is seeking assistance from a consultant to
design and let improvements for the schools and park district properties. We understand that the
Village is also requesting assistance in securing permissions, easements and/or rights to construct
improvements on property not controlled by the Village.
CB8EL prepared the 2015 Levee 37 Drainage Study on behalf nfthe Village and provided follow-up
services in response toVillage Board requests. Those efforts culminated in initial meetings with the
school districts and park district staff, oswell asthe U.S.Army Corps ofEngineers /USACE\ and the
Illinois Department of Natural Resources — Office of Water Resources (|DNR-OVVR) staff to pursue
funding sources. The Village isonly seeking assistance with the interior drainage improvements for
this proposal, and CD8ELunderstands that the USACE ispursuing the pump station improvements
independently. We believe that our prior experience with the study and the stakeholders gives us a
unique familiarity to complete the design and permitting within the Village's aggressive time frame.
We believe that with our extensive stonnvvater design experience with similar projects as
documented in our provided project fact sheets (TAB 3)proves that vve successfully perform this
type of work on a regular basis. We have vast experience with village -wide flood studies,
hydrologic/hydraulic modeling, engineering design and permitting. In the past few years, vve have
completed similar scale projects for Village -wide flood studies in Wheeling, Wilmette, Park Ridge,
Bartlett, Deer Park, Lake 8|u0[ Elmhurst, Bnnxvood Perk, River Forest, VVinnetka and other
communities. These studies have addressed flooding atmultiple locations within the municipal
boundaries and have provided the municipality with a blue print for addressing the stornmxvater
drainage problems with realistic solutions and a plan to complete the projects. Based on our
studies we were directed to proceed forward with the preparation of engineering plans and bid
documents in Park Ridge, Bartlett, Deer Park, Bmnvvnod Park, River Forest and VVinnetko.
Construction of these drainage improvements have been completed or are being completed. These
projects included working with stakeholders, park districts and uchnn| districts.
We are confident that CB8ELnan satisfy the Village's timeline and technical requirements with our
experienced and qualified staff. Within this proposal, you will find detailed information to address
the items outlined inthe Request for Proposals. our familiarity and capability Locomplete detailed
plans and specifications for stormvvaterimprovements isdocumented in this proposal. We have
provided contact information for you to verify our level of commitment and responsiveness to other
municipalities and clients performing similar efforts.
We believe that our proposal isvery comprehensive and detailed in scope, but CQBELiaopen hm
negotiating scope and fee as the selection process moves forward.
We trust that the attached material will demonstrate our enthusiasm, understanding, and expertise
to perform the necessary assignment. VVevery much appreciate the opportunity tosubmit our
proposal and look forward tmcontinuing the work that vvestarted. The projectteamwiUbe|edbx
Donald Uresse|, PE, CFM and his information, as well as that of other staff we propose for this
project, islocated inTAB 2. VVevalue our working relationship with the Village, and vvestand ready
to assist in every way possible. if you need any additional information please do not hesitate to
contact mneorDon.
Sinc&e y,
PE, D.VVRE,DistK4.ASCE
"'III '° 13 11 0 F:::"I IE IN T S
IIA13 4 11' lI..:.SCIII IGN OF: PROCIESS
UNI'D I'EIR'STAI` -D I N G
F'ROJE:::Cl APPIR(DACI I
01:11)JECTIVIES/SC OPF'. OF
"'III" I13 5 IES R:OJll::::;C'T' SO 1 1[ Ll Il1 111 WGIRK 11 0AID
11 IOURLY BREAKDOWN
OSED IN SE,:,ALIEE SE,,:,,]I,)ARA'l" 11:11: 118111 1181 II1 GlRl:.,:.)
W MOUN ANDSIDE
imm
liq
MA
III°:°'III III III°°flI;;;; IIC; IR"'t"'IE IR
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL)
9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 600
LICENSED
Rosemont, Illinois 60018
PROFESSIONALS T: 847.823.0500 F: 847.823.0520
cbbel.com
TOTAL CBBEL is unique among consulting engineering and surveying firms in that
STAFFwe are a full-service company that can comprehensively meet the needs
of both private and public sector clients. Guided by founder and President
Christopher B. Burke, our "family business" corporate philosophy allows for a
YEARS IN level of personal service that provides peace of mind. Our Illinois based staff
BUSINESS of 200 and expansive list of specializations — civil, municipal, transportation,
water resource, mechanical, structural, construction, traffic, environmental
engineering and environmental resource services — provide professionalism
and a depth of expertise that promote project success.
Christopher B. Burke, PhD, PE
ENR.com
ng'tirrer:rio rwrss,oir�d
Having received his doctoral degree in civil engineering from Purdue University, CBBEL President
Christopher B. Burke embraces education and encourages continued learning among his employees.
Our staff includes four PhDs, 78 licensed professional engineers, a team of licensed professional
land surveyors, a licensed structural engineer, and a licensed landscape architect. Additionally, three
employees are LEED accredited professionals, three are professional traffic operations engineers
(PTOE), and four have received the designation of Diplomate Water Resource Engineer (D.WRE).
Twenty-two staff are certified floodplain managers (CFM), 15 are certified professionals in erosion
and sediment control (CPESC) and nine are certified professionals in stormwater quality (CPSWQ).
Through leadership positions and active membership in a variety of professional associations and
university involvement, CBBEL is able to deliver cutting-edge technology and techniques as they
emerge. The outcome is a context -sensitive approach that rejects out -dated cookie -cutter remedies
and instead provides the best solution. Staff take part in national and local organizations including
the American Society of Civil Engineers, the American Council of Engineering Companies, the
American Public Works Association, the Illinois Association of Environmental Professionals, the
Illinois Association for Floodplain and Stormwater Management, the Society of American Military
Engineers, the American Academy of Water Resource Engineers, Chicago Wilderness Corporate
Council, the Society of Ecological Restoration, Western Society of Engineers, the Society of Wetland
Scientists, the Irish Engineers and Contractors, and the Illinois Road and Transportation Builders
Association to name a few.
The Burke Group of Companies, which includes CBBEL, has been recognized as one of Engineering
News Record's Top 500 Design Firms, currently ranking 173rd in the country.
Given CBBEL's commitment to hiring
exceptional personnel, prioritizing client
relationships and valuing education, it's not
surprising that we have received numerous
prestigious awards from the American Council
of Engineering Companies of Illinois, the
American Public Works Association, the
Illinois Section of the American Society of Civil
Engineers, the Illinois Chapter of the American
Planning Association, the Illinois Department
of Transportation, and the Illinois Tollway.
In addition, five employees have been the
recipient of an APWA Top Ten Leader of the
Year award; two of them went on to win at the
national level. In 2017, CBBEL clients and
projects received APWA Suburban Branch
awards for the Walnut ( Myrtle I Evergreen
Stormwater Improvement Project (City of Elmhurst), Northside Stormwater Management Project
(Village of River Forest) and Elmwood Park Flood Mitigation Project. APWA Lake Branch awards
were received for the Libertyville Multi Year Utility and Road Program and Peterson Road Corridor
Improvement (Lake County Division of Transportation). ACEC-IL awarded CBBEL an Engineering
Excellence Merit Award for the Northside Stormwater Management Project (Village of River Forest).
Our resources are geographically distributed to create a network of effective and convenient service.
Rosemont, Illinois is home to our main office while other Illinois locations include Evanston, New
Lenox and Peoria.
SERVICES
IES
Since its founding in 1986 the size of our company and the complexity of our projects have
grown. Today we provide not only design services, but also planning, preliminary engineering,
permitting, and construction observation. We have successfully completed the design, permitting
and construction of numerous major transportation and local municipal roadway projects, multi -
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. ( Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T: 847.823.0500 J .c ,b eJ,,;,c.Qm..
OVER 51
EMPLOYEES HAVE PARTICIPATED
OVER ....
'MILES COMMUTED ON BIKE
APPROXIMATELY
�/4, "0�Rm a4r7�11 V
"irv0?F '�euvA,!G' /// Op mem«,(N' op
POUNDS OF CO2
ELIMINATED ���,t�r�
NG)/
•
• r
oouuuumui
IIIIIIIIIIIIII�
OVER $70,00
IN GAS MONEY SAVEDV �11111iiIIIIJ IP,��"`°"U
use paths, bridges, flood control reservoirs, pump stations, embankments, water mains and water
systems, storm sewers, and large open channels.
We have served as lead engineer on a variety of major municipal and county undertakings. As a full-
service firm we also conduct water resource related studies, perform GIS services, environmental
resource assessments, mitigation planning and permitting and a myriad of traditional civil
engineering functions.
CBBEL has provided professional review services for municipalities, counties, and state agencies.
Ourexperience includesthe review of drainage, roadway, subdivision, sanitary sewer and mechanical
engineering submittals prepared by third -party consultants for both private and public sector clients.
Our office prepares an impressive number of high-quality stormwater management studies and
permit applications, having obtained more than 1,000 US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404
permits with accompanying TEPA water quality certifications, more than 500 Illinois Department
of Natural Resources -Office of Water Resources floodway construction permits, and 450 Federal
Emergency Management Agency Letters of Map Amendment and Letters of Map Revision.
Whether you require consulting for an individual project or the full service resources from one
of our departments, you can rely on Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. to take the time to
thoroughly understand your needs and partner with you to create innovative, cost-effective
solutions, Diversification and flexibility are the keys to our successful, long-term relationships with a
wide variety of clients, including municipalities, counties, townships, sanitary districts and drainage
districts throughout the Chicagoland area. We have unique knowledge and experience with various
funding programs available to our County and Municipal clients from the grant writing stage to the
design procedures required, as well as record keeping and funding reporting, giving our clients an
added service not easily found in the engineering industry.
GIRIBEIN 11N11 11 I"T IIVIES
CBBEL is at the forefront of sustainability/green initiatives and is a corporate leader when it comes
to implementation. Our Rosemont headquarters has a green roof, an aggressive composting/
recycling program and a long range plan to implement other energy saving devices courtesy of
our company's sustainability committee. We have installed 4 electric car charging stations on the
exterior of the main building in Rosemont.
In 2012 and 2013 (Honorable Mention), CBBEL received the Governor's Sustainability Award
for achievements in improving the environment. The company received the award for our
significant achievements in protecting the environment, helping sustain the future, and
improving the economy. In 2014, CBBEL was selected as one of IRTBA's Green Industry
Award recipients and also received a Conservation and Native Landscaping Award from
Chicago Wilderness.
One of the sustainability efforts for which the firm has been honored is our Bike to Work Program
where CBBEL provides mileage reimbursement, changing facilities and bicycle storage. Nearly 150
employees (from all of the Burke Group companies) have participated in the program and more than
320,000 miles have been commuted on bike.
We also have been recognized by the League of American Bicyclists as a
"Platinum" level Bicycle Friendly Business. The Bicycle Friendly Business
recognizes employer's efforts to encourage a more bicycle -friendly atmosphere PLATINUM
for employees and clients and honors innovative bike -friendly efforts. CBBEL��
is the only Illinois firm to be awarded Platinum status and is one of the few
Midwestern non -bike related businesses to be awarded Gold status or higher,
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. ( Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 T: 847.823.0500 J c, b,bl,,;,c,Q,m,
FIRM BACKGROUND INFORMATION
esting Service Corporation (TSC) has a recognized reputation for providing professional engineering
services. Since our 1954 incorporation, the firm has completed more than 87,000 projects, primarily
throughout Northern and Central Illinois. The corporate project list includes large scale residential,
commercial, retail and industrial development, as well as medium to large scale structures. Public infrastructure
such as roadways, bridges, tunnels, underground and earth retention systems are also included.
Operating from its corporate headquarters in Carol Stream, Illinois, TSC has branch facilities in DeKalb, Gurnee,
Rockford, Shorewood, Illinois. TSC employs a staff of more than 110, including 15 Professional Engineers and
Geologists. Our Geotechnical Engineering and Construction Materials Engineering operational groups are
supported by Laboratory and Drilling departments. These four departments can operate together or
independently depending on client/project specific needs.
Geotechnical Engineering (GEO) - TSC has practiced geotechnical engineering since its 1954 incorporation.
Our professional engineers have developed recommendations for standard spread footings, as well
as deep foundations including driven piles and caissons. Lateral earth pressure criteria has been
developed for evaluation and design of temporary and permanent support systems for deep
excavations and tunnels. Data from inclinometers and Menard pressuremeters is regularly employed
by TSC's geotechnical staff. In addition, our geotechnical staff is well experienced in roadway/
infrastructure projects.
Construction Materials Engineering (CME) - Our CME department is staffed by about 80 personnel
including eight (8) Professional Engineers. TSC technicians provide testing, observation and
sampling services for soils, Portland cement, bituminous concrete and structural steel on
construction projects. The following list highlights major field and laboratory construction materials
services that are routinely provided by TSC's Construction Materials Engineering group:
Soils - Observation for stripping, clearing and proof -rolling work; in-place nuclear moisture/density
tests; observation and testing during caisson and pile installation; pile load tests; testing,
observation and verification for exposed bearing soils.
Portland Cement Concrete - On-site observation and testing for air content, slump, unit weight,
compressive strength and temperature; batch plant inspection and testing; core sampling
and testing; rebound hammer and Windsor probe; locate rebar; precast and/or prestressed
concrete and reinforcing steel placement.
Masonry - ASTM C-780 construction evaluation of mortars; compressive strength of prisms and
flexural bond strength.
Bituminous (Asphalt) Paving Mixtures - Batch plant inspection and testing; field placement
observation; in-place nuclear density measurements; core sampling and testing; pavement
surveys and evaluation, bituminous mix design.
Structural Steel - Welding inspection by ultrasonic, magnetic particle, dye penetrate, and visual
procedures; monitoring of structural steel fabrication at shop; welder certification testing;
bolt torque verification; NDT technicians certified to SNT-TC-1A for UT, Mt and PT.
Technicians receive appropriate training for the services they are required to perform. Field
technicians assigned to various projects are certified and well versed in project specific requirements
and information. TSC has in-house capability to provide technicians with the radiation safety training
necessary for Nuclear/Moisture Density Gauge operators. Regular training for Structural Steel NDT
Technicians (Certified to SNT-TC-1A for UT, Mt and PT), Illinois Department of Transportation
QC/QA - Levels 1, 2 & 3, and Portland cement concrete testing using American Concrete Institute
materials are elements of the continuing training provided our technicians.
Firm Background
TSC maintains and operates a dedicated pick-up van service for field samples. The personnel who
perform this function are trained in ACI standards for handling of freshly cast concrete samples.
There is a charge for this service. However, responsible and expedient treatment of sample
materials makes this service a value.
Laboratory - The physical materials testing laboratory at TSC's location in Carol Stream is the largest of its
type in the state of Illinois. TSC's laboratory is an active participant in the National Voluntary
Laboratory Accreditation program. The firm is a member of the American Council of
Independent Laboratories.
Listed below are laboratory services regularly performed.
Soil index testing, included description water content, dry unit weight, Qu and Qp
Compaction testing, includes IBR/CBR, Standard/Modified proctors, relative density, lime
modified IBR and proctors.
Particle size analysis, includes sieve analysis, Atterberg limits and hydrometers
Tests for organic content
Test for corrosive soils
Permeability
Consolidation direct shear and Triaxial compression
Strength testing of PCC and mortar, includes beams, cores and masonry
Asphalt extraction tests
Mix design criteria - PCC and Bit
Aggregate testing, including abrasion, grain size, soundness, Chloride content and purity.
Rock Quality Testing -including by air method
Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test
TSC's Carol Stream lab also owns and operates a set of nuclear moisture/density gauge calibration blocks. This
system is used for yearly calibration of our own and other labs' nuclear moisture/density gauges. TSC is the only
independent lab in the five state area to have this "in-house" calibration capability.
Drilling - TSC owns, operates and maintains a drill fleet of 9 units. These drills have a wide range of
configurations and access capacity including truck, rubber tire and track mounted All -Terrain Vehicle
(ATV), skid and tripod. Drill supervisors are licensed, well drillers and crews have OSHA 40 -Hour
Health & Safety (Hazwoper) training.
Environmental - TSC provides environmental services in the areas of solid waste and site evaluation. Soil
waste services relate to siting, permitting, construction monitoring, quality assurance, expansion and
closure of landfills. Site evaluation services focus on Environmental Site Assessments (Phase I, II
and III), underground storage tanks, regulatory assistance and other remediation services. We also
provide exploration, evaluation and remedial design services for site-specific environmental
impairment issues.
0 FZG AIN II A-ri ON A I C HAIRT
LEVEE 37 LANDSIDE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
uiiiii CBBEL Employee uuuuu Subconsultant
If I,„ D DR EE 1,,,,, F) E y` p::: III
Vice President
Professional Engineer experienced in all aspects of water resources. Currently serving as
'° IEAIRS IEXIPIfi'rlR111ElNCw.lf: 38
Chairman of the Lake County Technical Advisory Committee. This committee reviews and makes
'° IEAIRS WII CII II (w.lw:blw:blw::ll.... 30
recommendations on revisions to the Lake County Watershed Development Ordinance and
Technical Reference Manual. Project Manager for golf course projects, including Master Plan
rll�l
L::11:3ce197799
Bachelor of Science,
assistance, engineering plans, drainage improvements and permitting. Provides supervision and
Civil Engineering
QA/QC for activities performed in the water resources department including hydrologic and
University of Illinois at
hydraulic studies, stormwater management studies, design of water resources systems, IDNR-
Urbana -Champaign
OWR Floodway Construction and Dam Permit applications, FEMA LOMB, wetland hydrologic
analysis, County Stormwater Management permit applications, Lake County WatershedPII
0F:If: SS11101NAll... IIP If (3115 C IRAf 11()1N
Development permit applications, Will County Special Use Permit for Floodplain development,
Professional Engineer, IL,
MWRDGC permit applications and development of construction plans and specifications.
062.041769, 1984
Provides drainage review and performs drainage studies for over 50 governmental bodies
throughout the six county area.
w.II:pla lllf 11 Ma 1101INS
Certified Floodplain Manager
WA'T"IEIRSIHIEII AlIN S1"QRIMWA'i"IER MAlNA IFIIVi11FlN"i" S"i"iJIDIIIFS
IAFSM
Sewer Separation Evaluation, Forest Park: Project Manager responsible for directing and
Private Pilot, Single Engine
providing QA/QC for the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and conceptual design. The Village
Land, Instrument Airplane
is served by a combination of combined sewers supplemented by relief storm sewers within
680 acres. An XP-SWMM was prepared to simulate the existing system and study alternatives to
1:1IR016 11111SS111101l1'4,VA11D 11111 V 11111 11 0 F, IA 11111: 114 F
reduce basement and street flooding. Various alternative separation plans were developed for
Ethics in City Government,
3 distinct drainage areas. Alternatives were developed with purpose of laying out a long term
Ethics Training for
phasing plan. Alternatives also evaluate the use of existing large diameter outlet combined sewers
CDA/OMP Contractors,
being converted to storm sewers and outleting to the Des Plaines River. Conceptual construction
Vendors and Employees
costs were developed and power point presentation made to Village Board and public.
Hydrologic Engineering
Schaumburg Convention Center Revised Stormwater Management Plan: Project Manager
Center: Interior Drainage
Course, Flood Control
responsible for development of a revised stormwater management plan. The revised plan
Channels, Unsteady
included deepening an existing dry basin, raising the High Water Level for 6 of the basins and
Flow Course, Waterways
lowering the Normal Water Level for 2 of the wet bottom basins. Control structure also was
Experiment Station
modified to obtain the allowable release rate. A new 36" storm sewer was required to convey
the stormwater flow that previously sheet flowed to the southernmost basin to the other basins.
1:1IR0lf IES WAIL.. AIf 1f llll...IIAC 110114S
In addition, permeable pavers were installed to satisfy newly required volume control. CBBEL
American Council of
prepared engineering plans and obtained a Watershed Management Permit from MWRD.
Engineering Companies
Northside Stormwater Management, River Forest: Project Manager for hydrologic and American Society of
hydraulic modeling, conceptual design and permitting of 280 acre study area. The area is Civil Engineers
served by small diameter combined sewers that flow northward to an interceptor sewer located Association of State
under North Ave. An XP-SWMM model was prepared to simulate the existing system and study Floodplain Managers
alternatives to reduce basement and street flooding. A separation plan was developed that
would include the installation of a storm sewer system that would convey storm flow to the Des Illinois Association for
Plaines River through a new 96" diameter outfall. Permits and/or approvals were obtained from Floodplain and Stormwater
MWRD, IDNR-OWR and USACE. Management
Flood Mitigation Plan, Elmwood Park: Project Manager responsible for hydrologic and Society of American
hydraulic modeling, conceptual design and permitting. Project consisted of installing separate Military Engineers
storm sewers for 250 acres of existing combined sewers. The new storm sewers vary in diameter
from 12" to a 3'x12' RCBC. The new storm sewer system outlets into 14 acre-foot stormwater
management basin located in the SE corner of Oak Park Country Club. Two 30" pipes convey
lower flow rates directly to the Des Plaines River. Once the 30" pipes have reached capacity,
stormwater will flow into the basin. A 150 cfs capacity pump station discharges the stormwater
collected in the basin to the Des Plaines River. A concrete stilling basin dissipates the pump
discharge energy prior to the flow outleting to the Des Plaines River. The last component is
a floodwall along located along the westside of Thatcher Ave which will prevent Des Plaines
floodwaters from inundating the neighboring residential community. Permits and/or approvals
were obtained from MWRD, IDNR-OWR, USACE, FPDCC, FEMA, IDOT and OPCC.
1-294 Industrial Park Flood Mitigation, Franklin Park: Project Manager responsible for
developing a regional flood mitigation plan. Elgin O'Hare -West Access expansion is proposed
to traverse through the Village parallel to the UPRR. As part of expansion, a complete
stormwater analysis of existing industrial area was performed to determine what measures could
be taken to reduce flooding. This study evaluated the existing drainage system, established
causes of flooding and recommended improvements to reduce the risk of future flooding. �loiiiiu
("hristol::)her If:',.. Burke Engineering, Ii Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
Additionally, study was performed to complement the drainage
study prepared for the EOWA and to compute detention
storage volume requirements and locate areas to provide this
storage volume. Permits were obtained from various agencies
including IDOT, UPRR, USACE, IDNR-OWR, EPA and MWRD.
Storm Event Evaluation, Clarendon Hills, DuPage County:
Project Manager. During April 17-18, 2013, the Village received
approx. 6" of rainfall in 18 hours. CBBEL participated in a public
meeting explaining how the existing drainage system works and
collecting information about the flooding that occurred during
this storm event. A flooding questionnaire was distributed by
Village to impacted residents. CBBEL surveyed high water marks
and performed a preliminary investigation of flood causes and
potential flood reduction improvements. A summary report
was presented. The next step is to perform a detailed study
of existing drainage system and potential flood reduction
improvements to determine the benefits and costs.
Addison Creek Reservoir Preliminary Engineering, Melrose
Park, MWRDGC: Project Manager responsible for managing
preparation of preliminary engineering plans for a 960 acre-
foot off-line flood control reservoir. Project components
included a diversion structure, spillway, excavated reservoir and
dewatering pump station. The project also included channel
improvements and existing pump station upgrades. Services
included soil borings, field survey, Phase I environmental study,
wetland assessment, storm sewer modeling, hydraulic analysis of
diversion structure and spillway, geotechnical analysis, structural
engineering, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, alternative
analysis, and preliminary engineering drawings.
Lower Des Plaines River Detailed Watershed Plan,
MWRDGC: Project Manager for this study which involved the
development of a detailed watershed plan for the entire Des
Plaines River watershed including tributaries. The study included
the collection of problem area information from various affected
municipalities, development and/or updating of all hydrologic
and hydraulic models, development and evaluation of flood
reduction measures and preparation of detailed watershed
plan. Phase A which included data collection and problem area
evaluation was completed. The study will be completed in Phase
B with the publishing of Detailed Watershed Plan Report.
Farm View Pump Station and Storm Sewer, Homer Glen: A
natural depression adjacent to Farm View subdivision was filling
within stormwater runoff resulting in inundation of rear yards
of adjacent homes. Historically, the depression would dewater
through a clay field tile. The field tiled failed causing depression
to remain filled for extended periods of time. CBBEL developed
a plan to improve the situation which included the installation
of pump station and new outlet storm sewer. The pump station
will drain the depression into the new outlet storm sewer which
conveys flows downstream into a watercourse. CBBEL prepared
the engineering plans and specifications.
Niagara Avenue Drainage Study, Schaumburg: The area is
drained by a roadside ditch that flows into a 1,800 LF 42" storm
sewer. During a storm event, the storm sewer reached capacity
resulting in overland flow between homes and ditch overflowing
into adjacent residential yards. CBBEL evaluated the drainage
problem and recommended flood reduction measures. Used
If 1,„ D DR EE 1,,,,, F) E y` p::: III
Page 2 of 6
XP-SWMM to analyze the existing conditions using the recorded
rainfall data. The calibrated XP-SWMM was then used to assess
the benefits of alternative remedial measures. Recommended
plan consisted of excavation of an existing park to provide
stormwater storage and installation of an additional outlet storm
sewer to improvement conveyance capacity.
CITGO Refinery Parking Lot and Roadway Improvements,
Romeoville: A temporary gravel parking lot and bus roadway
were installed within a Zone A floodplain. In addition to parking
lot, Village requested that CITGO install a new access road,
improve 135th St with turn lanes, and install a traffic signal at
the intersection. The access road would also be used to service
a future Metra Commuter Station parking lot. CBBEL prepared
a floodplain study for a tributary to the I&M Canal that flows
east to west through the parking lot which is located south of
135th St. A field survey was completed to obtain watercourse
cross-sections and parameters of various existing culverts. A
hydrologic model was developed for the watershed and 10- and
100 -year peak flow rates were determined. A hydraulic model
was developed to produce the 10- and 100 -year flood profiles
through the project site. Preliminary and final engineering
plans were prepared for the various improvements and permit
applications to the Village.
Regional Stormwater Management Facility, Bolingbrook:
Project Manager for Phase II design of the facility along Lily
Cache Creek. Using the Lily Cache Creek hydrologic and
hydraulic models developed by FEMA, CBBEL developed a
preliminary plan for several stormwater management basins
that would provide detention and floodplain storage for future
development of tributary properties. Construction of the
basins would also produce a beneficial lowering of Lily Cache
Creek 100 -year profile through the study area. CBBEL prepared
various documents showing the cost and distribution benefits to
each tributary property. CBBEL also prepared the Joint Permit
Application and FEMA CLOMR and LOMR requests.
Stormwater Master Plan Study Update, Des Plaines: Project
Manager. Based on an intense short duration storm, the City
identified 13 areas that the updated study would evaluate. A
flood damage questionnaire was prepared and sent to study
area homeowners. Additional information was gathered during
8 ward meetings. Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling was
performed to evaluate the capacities of combined storm sewer
systems and existing/proposed detention storage facilities and
overland flow routes. The results were compared to observe
high water elevations and flood information received from City
staff, flood damage questionnaires and neighborhood meetings.
Various alternatives to mitigate the flooding were developed
and evaluated. A final report was prepared summarizing the
study and included a recommended plan, opinions of probable
costs, and implementation schedule.
Downtown Watershed Plan, Roselle: Project Manager for the
development of watershed plan for proposed redevelopment
of downtown district. Stormwater management is a required
component so the Village created a unique solution that also
fulfilled another important community need.
Christol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
Parkside Park was a 5.5 -acre recreational area under jurisdiction
of Roselle Park District and in need of upgrading. The Village
was able to lower the Park's elevation to provide 6.5 acre-feet
of stormwater management storage needed for the entire
downtown redevelopment. In return, the Village agreed to
upgrade the existing baseball facilities and assist the Park
District in the creation of a new skate park. CBBEL used the
unsteady -state XP-SWMM model to analyze the 65 -acre
watershed for existing and proposed drainage conditions. The
model was used to size the storm sewer needed to convey the
100 -year discharge from redeveloped area to Parkside Park. In
order to create the required stormwater management storage,
existing park elevations were lowered an average of 24.
Park Avenue Detention Basin Improvement, Clarendon
Hills: Project Manager on this improvement project consisting
of conversion of existing dry detention basin located within
the headwaters of Flagg Creek to a multi -use facility. The basin
was re -graded to provide a sports field area. Underdrains and
a special turf/sand surface were provided to allow drainage of
the field area after a rainfall event or after it has been inundated
with detention basin water. The deeper portion of excavated
basin was planted with native plants which promote filtration
of the stored stormwater. A new pump station was constructed
that dewaters the basin to an existing storm sewer. CBBEL
prepared concept, preliminary and final engineering plans and
presented the plan to Village Board, Park District Board, and
residents. CBBEL also prepared stormwater management permit
application along with XP-SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic
analysis, as well as provided construction observation services.
Northwest Drainage Study, Roselle: Project Manager. Two
to five times per year an existing detention basin becomes
filled during a storm event. Once full stormwater overflows into
surrounding residential areas and streets. CBBEL prepared a
detailed hydrologic model of the watershed to define existing
detention basin High Water Level for various storm events.
Alternatives for increasing the available stormwater storage in
watershed were developed and evaluated with hydrologic model
Opinions of Probable Cost were developed for each studied
alternative. A report was prepared documenting the study.
Timbers Edge Subdivision Stormwater Management Study,
Tinley Park: Project Manager to determine the cause(s) of
flooding and develop a recommended improvement plan. CBBEL
selected the dynamic XP-SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model
to simulate the subdivision's complex stormwater runoff routing
which included both storm sewers and overland flow routes
located between existing homes. The model was prepared
using a combination of record plans and new field surveys. A
public meeting was held with affected residences to present the
cause(s) and obtain input on possible flood mitigation measures.
CBBEL developed various flood mitigation measures that were
evaluated with XP-SWMM model and Opinions of Probable Cost
for recommended plan. A report was prepared documenting the
study as well as construction documents.
Orland Park Stormwater Management Study: Project
Manager. Homes and streets became inundated when 2
regional detention facilities were filled. CBBEL staff developed
detailed hydrologic and hydraulic models of the facilities
If I,„ D DR EE 1,,,,, F) E y` p::: III
Page 3 of 6
and their tributary watershed. The models were calibrated
using high water marks from the storm event. The calibrated
models assisted in determining cause of flooding. Various
flood mitigation improvements were developed and evaluated;
based on results a recommended plan was prepared along with
Opinion of Probable Cost.
Schaumburg Convention Center Preliminary Evaluation:
CBBEL staff evaluated wetland, floodplain, drainage, and
future detention storage requirements of this 46 -acre site. Site
included a Zone A floodplain that CBBEL prepared hydrologic
and hydraulic models to define the 100 -year storm event flood
elevation. Areas where compensatory storage excavation could
be accommodated were outlined. Various ways of providing
required detention storage were evaluated and presented. For
each alternative, construction costs were developed. CBBEL's
wetland specialist determined that 11.77 acres of wetland were
within the site. Based on the Supreme Court's SWANCC ruling,
CBBEL requested that USACE issue was a "non -jurisdictional"
determination since the on-site wetlands were isolated. USACE
agreed with CBBEL's request and issued determination letter.
Willow -Higgins Creek Flood Control, Rosemont: Planned,
designed and permitted the relocation and improvement
of 3,100 LF of Willow -Higgins Creek channel. The channel of
creek was formed by 12' high precast concrete floodwalls. Also
included was a 4 celled 9'x9' RCBC which allowed construction
of a parking lot for the Health Club. Permits and approvals
were obtained from IDNR-OWR, USACE and IEPA. In addition,
CLOMR and LOMR were obtained from FEMA to relocate the
floodplain. Funding was provided by IDNR-OWR.
Rand Park Flood Control, Des Plaines: Under contract
with IDNR-OWR, CBBEL prepared design report, preliminary
engineering, CLOMR request and joint permit application to
IDNR-OWR, USACE and IEPA. Project consisted of a dam/pump
station and concrete floodwall. The purpose is to prevent Des
Plaines River floodwaters from backing up Farmers Creek and
inundating residential and business districts. The floodwall
along the Des Plaines River is 2,100' in length; the pump station
will have a capacity of 250 cfs and will have motor driven sluice
gates. During high flood stages on the Des Plaines River, the
gates will close, preventing Des Plaines River floodwaters from
inundating Farmers Creek.
Flood Insurance Study, Hamilton County, IN: Developed
hydraulic models for 13 watercourses in this county north of
Indianapolis, IN. The total length of the watercourses modeled
(34.7 mi.) were surveyed. The associated floodplains and
floodways were delineated for future regulatory purposes.
Stormwater Master Plans, Portage, IN: The City has
several major rivers that convey watershed runoff through its
boundaries. The regulatory hydraulic models for Robbins Ditch
and Willow Creek were updated with new field survey data.
Results of the models were used to evaluate problem flooding
areas and formulate projects to alleviate these problems.
The Stormwater Master Plan for correcting the investigated
stormwater problems was provided to the City as an outline for
future funding needs.
�0000mo III
�IIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII
Christol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
Plum Grove Road Culvert Replacement, Roselle: FEQ
unsteady flow model was utilized to size and permit a reinforced
concrete box culvert replacement for 2 deteriorating corrugated
metal pipes. The culvert had to be sized so that no adverse
hydraulics occurred upstream and downstream so it would be
in compliance with DuPage County Stormwater and Floodplain
Ordinance.
Wood Dale — Itasca Flood Control, IDOT: Planned, designed,
and permitted 1,775 acre-feet of flood control storage for a 130 -
acre site. Prepared design drawings to meet IDOT requirements
for Elgin -O'Hare expressway. Provided a detailed environmental
and wetland assessment and preparation of mitigation plans.
Total construction cost estimated at $50 million.
Flood Insurance Study, Unincorporated Kane County:
Extension of HIS upstream on 7 creeks. Included coordinating
channel survey work on over 45 miles of channel.
Flood Control Study, Oakbrook: Investigated flood control
alternatives for the Oakbrook reach of Salt Creek. Evaluated
proposed projects and coordinated the field survey for over 70
channel cross-sections.
1-294 Tollway Widening, Illinois Tollway: A drainage study
was completed for 13 miles of tollway that was proposed for
widening. Scope included hydrologic and hydraulic analyses of
detention storage facilities, floodplain encroachment, wetland
mitigation, and storm sewer extension and replacement.
Lake Michigan Diversion Accounting, USACE: An
investigation of flow parameters developed for the Lake
Michigan diversion accounting using the HSPF model. Included
updating and calibration of the model.
Canal/Tunnel Modeling, USACE: Developed unsteady flow
computer models for the Chicagoland canal system and Tunnel
and Reservoir Plan.
Kankakee River Sedimentation Study, IN: Investigated
potential impacts to sedimentation from the proposed levee
improvements. The investigation was performed with HEC -6
sedimentation computer model.
Upper Salt Creek Regulatory Floodplain Study, IDOT:
Phase I consisted of data collection for 36 miles of channel,
development of software, and compilation of FEQ inputs. Phase
II involved the preparation and calibration of detailed HEC -1
and HEC -2 hydrologic and hydraulic models. The calibrated/
verified models were used to produce 10-, 50-, 100- and 500 -
year flood profiles. Revised floodplain/floodway boundaries were
delineated and submitted to FEMA in support of a LOMR.
Lower Salt Creek Study, DCDEC: Study of 50 square miles
including the evaluation of regional flood control alternatives
using the FEQ computer model. Included evaluation of several
floors mitigation measures espoused by local communities. Also
included evaluating the feasibility of using the Elmhurst Quarry
forflood control purposes.
Flood Control Study, Bensenville: Study of 5 square miles
including evaluation of mitigation measures to reduce overbank
If I,„ D DR EE 1,,,,, F) E y` p::: III
Page 4 of 6
flooding damages from Willow and Addison Creeks. Proposed
measures included upstream storage, channel improvements
and culvert replacement.
Lily Cache Slough Watershed Study, Will County: Hydrologic
and hydraulic model development to establish floodplain
Stormwater management and policy options for developing
areas. The study was adopted by the Village of Romeoville and
FEMA as the regulatory floodplain/floodway.
AIRPORT IPIROXEO:TS
O'Hare International Airport Modernization Plan, Chicago:
Technical Project Manager for this extensive modernization plan
that includes new runways, taxiways, roadways and buildings.
As subconsultant to City's Master Civil Engineer, CBBEL's
role is to develop stormwater management plan and prepare
requirements to implement the plan. In order to accommodate
the proposed airport facilities, Willow -Higgins Creek and
Bensenville Ditch are being relocated and portions enclosed
through the airport. CBBEL performed the necessary hydrologic
and hydraulic modeling, prepared the IDN R-OWR floodway
construction permit application packages and prepared
engineering plans for Willow -Higgins Creek improvements.
CBBEL performed the Bensenville Ditch hydrologic and hydraulic
modeling and prepared the IDN R-OWR floodway construction
permit application for the interim and completion phase channel
relocation. CBBEL also performed the hydrologic modeling
needed to determine the stormwater storage volume required
to accommodate the proposed impervious surfaces. XP-SWMM
model was used to size proposed trunk storm sewers needed
to convey future runoff volume to proposed management
basin. The north, south and central stormwater management
basins were sized along with the storm sewer network. LDS was
performed for the Irving Park relocation.
Access Road, DuPage County Airport, West Chicago: A
portion of the existing perimeter road located south of
Runway 02R/20L threshold needed to be realigned slightly in
a SW direction to achieve compliance with FAA regulations.
Relocation required placement of a minor amount of fill placed in
Kress Creek Tributary 4B floodplain. CBBEL prepared floodplain
fill calculations based on provided improvement engineering
plans. Compensatory storage was provided in the Kress
Creek Regional Flood Control Facility located downstream.
CBBEL prepared Stormwater Management Permit application
package that was submitted to DuPage County for review and
concurrence. DuPage County certification was received and the
City issued the Stormwater Management Permit.
Dam Inspection, DuPage County Airport, West Chicago: As
part of the overall drainage network there are 2 small size Class
III low hazard dams. These dams located along a Kress Creek
tributary have an earthen embankment with a concrete pipe
spillway. Structures were permitted by IDNR-OWR in 1999. The
dams require a formal inspection every 5 years, annual Owner's
Maintenance Statement and annual Owner's Operation and
Maintenance Plan Statement. CBBEL completed the formal
dam inspection. IDNR-OWR dam inspection forms were
compiled and provided to DuPage County Airport Authority for
submission to IDNR-OWR.
I'Iiiii;o
IIIIIIII�IIIIIIII
Christol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Ii L'1. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
G01 IF COURSE PROJEC"T"S
Course #2 Renovation, Medinah Country Club, DuPage
County: Project Manager. MCC hired golf course architect Rees
Jones to assist superintendent with preparation of a master
plan for renovation. CBBEL's role was to develop a drainage
improvement plan for the area by the 1st hole, 8th hole and 17th
hole. There are low lying areas by these holes that are drained
by a 1920's installed clay tile. The clay tile is failing causing long
duration inundation of low areas causing existing cart paths to be
flooded and grass areas to be killed. CBBEL developed a plan to
replace the old clay tile with a new ADS drain pipe system with
larger pipes to help prevent debris blockage. Prior to discharging
to a small waterway, a control structure will restrict outflows to
existing conditions flow rates. Engineering plans were prepared
and Stormwater Management Permit obtained from DuPage Co.
Mount Prospect Golf Club Renovation: Project Manager.
MPPD hired golf course architect Dave Esler to develop a
renovation plan. The plan involved rerouting several holes,
replacement of all greens and tees, new bent grass for fairways
and new cart paths. CBBEL prepared engineering plans for
proposed grading, stormwater management basins, access
road, wetland mitigation and sediment and erosion control.
CBBEL also prepared SWPPP that was submitted to IEPA. MWRD
Watershed Management Ordinance required detention basins
to be constructed. Within the golf course layout, CBBEL blended
11 dry bottom basins and 1 wet bottom basin. Dry basins are
planted with blue grass in order for them to blend into the golf
course. Wet bottom basin is also used for a source of irrigation
water. Portions are located within the flood plain/floodway of
Weller Creek which bisects the property. Some minor filling
of the floodplain occurred requiring an area of compensatory
storage excavation. Permits and/or approvals were obtained
from USACE, IDNR-OWR, MWRD, TEPA and the Village.
Prairie Landing Golf Club, West Chicago: Project Manager for
bunker renovation project. The golf club is owned by DuPage
Airport Authority and located just south of DuPage Airport. DAA
hired the course's original golf course architect Robert Trent
Jones, Jr. to develop a bunker renovation plan. The plan involved
removing bunkers and constructing new bunkers. Tributaries to
Kress Creek flow through the golf course resulting in portions
being located within the floodplain. CBBEL assisted golf course
architect in preparation of plans that are acceptable for permit
application. The plans included grading and soil and erosion
control. Stormwater Management Permit was obtained from the
City and DuPage County.
New Employee Parking Lot, Butterfield Country Club:
Project Manager. Location of the new 40 space parking lot
included detention basin for existing parking lot. Layout of
the parking lot required that a portion of existing detention
basin to be filled. In order to reduce the amount of new
detention storage, the new parking lot was constructed with
permeable pavers instead of asphalt. A new detention basin
was constructed south of the new parking lot that provided
detention storage for asphalt access drive, new sidewalks and
for the displaced existing detention storage. New detention
basin was vegetative with native grasses and interconnected
with the existing detention basin. The voids in the permeable
paver gravel base were used to satisfy the Volume Control BMP
ordinance requirement. CBBEL prepared engineering plans,
If I,„ D DR EE 1,,,,, F) E y` p::: III
Page 5 of 6
assisted with bidding process and prepared permit applications.
CBBEL obtained the Stormwater Management Permit from
DuPage County.
Course #1 Renovation, Medinah Country Club, DuPage
County: Project Manager. MCC hired golf course architect,
Tom Doak, to prepare a renovation plan. CBBEL's role was to
analyze the existing drainage for both Course #1 and Course #2.
Based on analysis, CBBEL developed a comprehensive drainage
improvement plan that worked with proposed golf course
renovation. This drainage plan included new dry storage basins
with new drainage pipes which will allow stormwater to be kept
away from playable areas. CBBEL prepared engineering plans
reflecting the proposed grading and drainage improvements.
In addition, streambank stabilization plan was developed for
Meacham Creek shoreline that consisted of river boulder toe,
flatter bank slopes and vegetation. The last improvement was
a new weir/bridge (12'x80') across Meacham Creek by the new
17th hole location. CBBEL prepared a detailed SWPPP as well
as permit applications to DuPage County for a stormwater
management permit, USACE for a section 404 permit,
IDNR-OWR for a dam safety permit, and TEPA for a NPDES
Construction permit. All permits/approvals were received.
Drainage Improvements, Glen View Club: Project Manager.
The 18 -hole private Glen View Club has extensive overbank
flooding from The North Branch Chicago River. The overbank
results in course damage and loss of revenue. CBBEL prepared
a comprehensive study to develop and evaluate short and long
term drainage improvements. The short term project was 3 large
wet wells located in low areas of the course. Superintendent
can place portable gas powered pumps on wet wells and pump
trapped water back to the river. The long term project consisted
of construction of berms to prevent floodwaters from inundating
playing areas.
Meacham Creek Dam Replacement, Medinah Country Club,
DuPage County: Project Manager. The purpose of the dam is to
create a pond in front of Course #1 18th hole green and to allow
golf course access across the creek. Water began seeping under
the dam causing the pond to disappear and jeopardizing the dam
and bridge structure. CBBEL performed a structural geotechnical
evaluation of the dam and determined it needed to be replaced.
CBBEL sized the new dam using the Meacham Creek FEQ model,
prepared engineering plans and permit applications.
Course #3 Improvements, Medinah Country Club, DuPage
County: In anticipation of 2010 Ryder Cup, MCC completed
improvements to their club. One of the major revisions is the
reworking of the 15th hole to allow the pro golfers to attempt to
drive this par 4. Revisions to the 15th hole included new green
and bunkers, new tee and 2 new ponds that are positioned
precariously next to the green. The existing area of the 15th
hole green and adjacent 16th hole tee has historically been a
problem wet area. CBBEL analyzed the existing drainage of the
15th/16th holes area and developed a comprehensive drainage
improvement plan that worked in harmony with Rees Jones golf
hole improvements.
il
";;hristc>I::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, II..:Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbeLcom
The original golf improvement plan included one pond; CBBEL
expanded this concept 6yadding anadditional pond that
increases the famous Course #3mormwaterstorage. |naddition,
the 16th hole tee area was elevated toallow play even during
wet periods. CBBELworked closely with golf course architect in
developing grading' drainage and soil erosion control plans for
proposed improvements. The engineering plans were used for
bidding and permitting. ADuPageCounty StormwaterPermit
was obtained onbehalf ofMCC. CBBELalso prepared the
SVVPPPand NO|
Butterfield Country Club Renovation, DuPageCounty:
Assisted the golf course architect (Steve SmyersGolf Course
Architects) indeveloping aMaster Plan for future golf course
improvements. Axtream6ank stabilization and relocation plan
for Ginger Creek was prepared. Proposed improvements are
consistent with OuPagoCounty Ginger Creek Watershed Plan.
FEOunsteady flow model was used toevaluate the effectiveness
ofproposed storage volume. [}nbehalf ofCountry Club, [BBEL
applied for and obtained permits from DuPageCoand USACE.
Twin Orchard Country Club, Lake County: Two tributaries
to Indian Creek drain the County Club along with 18Oacres of
offsite drainage area. During significant rainfall events, playing
portions ofthe two 18-ho|ocourses become inundated. CBBEL
prepared aMaster StorrowatorPlan. The plan was coordinated
with golf course architect David Ex|erwho redesigned 4
holes. The plan included construction of12new mormwater
management basins. The bottoms ofthe basins are planted with
either blue grass ornative vegetation. In addition, 7existing
ponds were expanded toprovide additional gonnwat*,storage.
The new basins are designed tostore runoff inlocations where
golf play would not 6einterrupted. |naddition, old clay tiles that
drain the fairways were replaced with new plastic pipes. CBBEL
prepared engineering plans and obtained approvals and permits
from USACE'LCSK4Cand LCPBD.
Olympia Fields Country Club, Cook County: Butterfield
Creek flows through the south golf course. Proposed golf course
improvements within the regulatory Hoodwayand floodplain
required permits. The golf course improvements included new
golf cart bridges, relocation ofexisting golf cart bridges and
grading. Ajoint permit application for proposed improvements
was submitted to IDNR-OWR, USACE and EPA.
Gregg's Landing Development, Vernon Hills, Lake
County: Planned, designed and permitted the 31basin
mormwatermanagement system, 2culvert crossings, wetland
mitigation plan, and compensatory storage area for this 950 -
acre development.
5O'acnedewe|opment. Residential development has an 18 -hole
championship golf course (White Deer Run) that will also
incorporate many ofthe detention basins.
TAM Golf Course Improvement Plans, Niles Park District:
The 9 -hole golf course is located within The North Branch
Chicago River800dp|ain, Construction plans and specifications
were prepared for apump station and storm sewer, new parking
lot, parking lot lighting, and excavation for acompensatory and
detention storage facility. Project required permits from IDNR-
OWR, USACE, IEPA and MWRDGC,
DONAI D DRESSE1 F)E» CF:::�I\A
Page 6 of 6
Seven Bridges Golf Club, Woodridge, DuPageCounty: The
East Branch DuPagoRiver, Prentiss Creek and Hobson Creek
(Tributary No. 0flow through the project site. Project consisted
of an 18 -hole Championship Golf Course, residential subdivision
and commercial areas. Five on-line dams were constructed
across relocated Prentiss Creek and EBDR.Plans were prepared,
adam permit obtained from |DNR'OVVR'and mormwater
management plan was developed for the entire development.
The created on-line stormwaterbasins satisfy the project's
detention and compensatory storage requirements. CLOK4Rand
U]MRwere received from FEMA.
PERMITS O0TA��IVED
Applied for and received over 1OOpermits including |DNR-OVVR
Floodway Construction and FEMA LOMR.
WETLAND HY0R01 0 GY s rU DUES
°
Baker Lake, FPDCC' Barrington
� Caputo'sFresh Market, Woodridge
w FarmviewSubdivision, Will County Land Use Department
w FemonCreek Wetland Bank, L/AWR.Kane County
°
Four Colonies Deve|opment, RDG, Crystal Lake
°
Hanover Park Wetland Bank, Northern Builders
°
Heritage Woods Subdivision, Pasqvine||iDevelopment
Group, West Chicago
°
Internationale Centre, Catellus Development, Woodridge
°
The Oaks Wetland Bank, LAVVR'Joliet
° Windy Point, Fifield Development, Schaumburg
° Woodfield Preserve, Hines, Schaumburg
° Woodland Meadows Subdivision, RDG'Hebron
AWARDS
APVVAProject ofthe Year, Environment under $2million,
Parkside Park, Roselle, 2005
APVVAProject ofthe Year, Environmental under $2million,
West Branch Salt Creek Tributary No. 4Bank Stabilization,
Schaumburg, 1997
Outstanding Planning Achievement Award (Group Award),US
Army Corps of Engineers, 1986
Chicagolan6Un6erOmwPlan (CUP)Incentive Award, U3Army
Corps ofEngineers, 1984
il
("hristol::)her IB Burke Engineering, i Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
s
President
EIDU A'T"II SIN
Doctor of Philosophy, 1983
Civil Engineering
Purdue University
Master of Science, 1979
Civil Engineering
Purdue University
Bachelor of Science, 1977
Civil Engineering
Purdue University
PIRQFIE55110NAII.... IRIE wll51"IR°A'1'10I''4
Professional Engineer, IL, 062040284, 1982
Professional Engineer, IN, 060019415, 1981
Professional Engineer, OH, PE -57544, 1993
Professional Engineer, WI, 30985-6, 1995
C1EIR1"IIIFII A'T"II01IN5
Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC)
Honorary Doctorate, Purdue University (HDR), 2010
Diplomate Water Resources Engineer (D.WRE)
Fellow, American Society of Civil Engineers (F.ASCE)
Distinguished Member, American Society of Civil Engineers (Dist.M.ASCE)
National Academy of Construction (NAC)
EIKPII...OYIIMIIEIN"T" IH IIS"T"AIRY
1986 to Present, Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd.
President
1983 to 1986, Harza Environmental Services,
Senior Urban Hydrologist/Environmental Engineer (1986), Urban Hydrologist (1983-1986)
AWARDS
National Top Ten Public Works Leaders of the Year Award, American Public Works Association, 2013
Edmund Friedman Professional Recognition Award, National ASCE, 2010
Illinois Section - ASCE Civil Engineer of the Year, 2009
IAFSM (Illinois Association for Floodplain and Stormwater Management) Lifetime Achievement Award, 2006
President's Lifetime Award, Purdue University Engineering Alumni Association, 2001
Distinguished Engineering Alumnus Award, Purdue University, 1998
Civil Engineering Alumni Achievement Award, Purdue University, 1995
Chi Epsilon (National Civil Engineering Honor Society) Trustee, 1995
Chicago Metro Chapter Meritorious Award Recipient, APWA 1993
Chi Epsilon (National Civil Engineering Honor Society) Honor Member, 1990
Edmund Friedman Young Engineer Award, National ASCE, 1986
Charles Ellet Award, Western Society of Engineers, 1986
Young Civil Engineer of the Year Award, ASCE Illinois Section, 1985
Nellie S. Munson Award for the Outstanding Graduate Instructor in the School of Civil Engineering
with Teaching Responsibilities, Purdue University, 1981
Estus H. and Vashti L. Magoon Outstanding Graduate Instructor Award, Purdue University, 1980
";;hristc>I::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, II..:Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbeLcom
Page 2 of 3
EIPIEIRIIIEINIE
Involved with management and technical guidance of Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. (CBBEL) since its founding in 1986. Also
serves as an expert witness for numerous cases in circuit and federal courts representing both public and private sector clients in
Illinois and Indiana. CBBEL serves as the Consulting Engineer for numerous municipalities and is involved with civil, transportation,
drainage, mechanical, environmental and water resources engineering and construction observation for an array of private, municipal,
county, state and federal agencies.
VJINIIVIEIRSII"T"Y IIINV01VIEIIMIIEIN1"
Purdue University Civil Engineering Department Head Search Committee, 2011
Board Member and 2010-2011 Chair of the Purdue President's Council Leadership Board
Member and Past Chair of the Purdue University Civil Engineering Advisory Council, 1992 -Present
Purdue Champions Committee
Professor of Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Fall 2002 -Present (CME 215/397/403/427/494)
Member of the University of Illinois at Chicago Civil Engineering Professional Advisory Council, 2000 -Present
Member of the University of Illinois at Chicago Civil Engineering Industrial Advisory Board, 2006 -Present
College of DuPage Foundation, Board Member, 2013 -Present
CE 301, Hydraulics and Hydrology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Spring 1987 and 1988
CE 341, Hydraulics, Hydrology and Drainage, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, Spring 1980-1982
Lab Instructor and/or Grader, Purdue University, Fall 1978-1983 (CE 440 Urban Hydrology, CE 241 Fluid Mechanics, CE 393 Systems
Engineering, CE 497E Environmental Fluid Mechanics)
PIRQFIESSI10NAII.... AIFIFIIII....VA'T"I10NS
American Council of Engineering Companies of Illinois, Past President, Vice President and Director
American Public Works Association, Lifetime Member
American Society of Civil Engineers
Member National Awards Committee (2015)
Past ASCE President, Treasurer and Director (Illinois Section)
Past Chairman Student Affairs Committee (Illinois Section)
Past Chairman of Urban Planning and Development Group (Illinois Section)
Past ASCE Infrastructure Committee (Indiana Section)
Past Chairman of National ASCE Surface Water Committee, Irrigation and Drainage Division
ASCE Task Committee on Urban Subsurface Drainage
Alfred Noble Prize Committee (National)
Environment and Water Resources Institute: Statistical Distribution in Hydrology Task Committee &
Urban Drainage Standards Committee (National)
Chairman 1987 Water Resources Symposium
Past Reviewer for ASCE Journals of Hydraulics Irrigation and Drainage, and the Water Resources Bulletin
Control Member of the National ASCE Hydrology Manual, Urban Hydrology Chapter
Technologist Credentialing Task Committee (TCTC) (October 2011 -Present)
ASTM International, ASTM Committee F17 on Plastic Piping Systems
Chicagoland Engineers Week, Washington Award Commission (Chairman, 2003 -Present)
Chicago Wilderness Corporate Council, Corporate Member
Choose DuPage, Member
The Conservation Foundation, Chairman, Past Vice Chairman, Trustee, Past Secretary
Downers Grove Economic Development Corporation, Board Member
DuPage Business Council, Board Member
DuPage County Real Estate Task Force, Member
";;hristc>I::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbeLcom
Page 3 of 3
Du Page County Sperling Award AD HOC Committee (Member, 2007-2012)
Illinois Association for Floodplain and Stormwater Management
Illinois Association of Environmental Professionals, Treasurer
Illinois Clean Energy Coalition, Steering Committee Member
Illinois Road and Transportation Builders Association, Past Director, Planning and Design Division
Indiana Water Resources Association
Irish Engineers and Contractors
Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation, Treasurer, Board of Directors
Metropolitan Planning Council, Resource Board, Board of Governors, Past Co -Chair Sensible Growth Committee
The Morton Arboretum, Board of Trustees, Building & Grounds Committee (Head, 2012 -Present), Campaign Steering Committee
National Academy of Construction
National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), Member
Natural Area Association
US Bank Advisory Board (2010 -Present)
Water Environment Federation, Stockholm Junior Water Prize Committee
The Wetlands Initiative, Member, Director
Western Society of Engineers, Past President, Director
�0000mo III
�IIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIII
Christol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbeLcom
Vice President, Head, Civil Engineering Design Department
Head of Civil Engineering Design Department, which includes 16 civil engineers, 5 structural "SIF! ARSIF! XPIIERIIIEINCIEF 26
engineers, 5 CAD technicians, and 1 landscape architect. Experience covers a wide variety of YEARS WI11 i IFN 4::.IBIF: IEIIL. 23
civil and structural engineering projects. Responsibilities include civil and structural engineering
project management and design. Civil engineering experience includes design of highways, ! f�u��.".�, II�199898
Master of Science,
local roads, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, parks, stormwater management facilities, streambank
Civil Engineering,
stabilization projects, and utility projects. Structural projects include design and inspection of Transportation, University of
bridges, parking garages, dams, spillways, retaining walls, and culverts. Illinois at Chicago
i"If�All�5lfOlf�"i"A''i"IIOII�
Bachelor of Science, 1991
1-94 North Tri-State Tollway Reconstruction, Illinois Tollway: QA/QC Manager for the
Civil Engineering, Structures
widening and reconstruction of five miles of the Tri-State Tollway in Lake County. This project
University of Illinois at
extends from IL 60 (Town Line Road) to IL 137 (Buckley Road) and includes ramp work at the Lake
Urbana -Champaign
Forest Oasis, ramp reconstruction at the IL 176 (Rockland Road) and Buckley Road Interchanges,
widening and rehabilitation of two 1-94 bridges over railroads, substantial drainage
11111ROIFIESSIOINA11.. RIEG1IS If RA llOIN
improvements including replacement of all existing median storm sewers and cross culverts, a
Professional Engineer, IL,
box culvert extension, removal and replacement of all signage and all interchange lighting, and
062.050850, 1996
relocations of fiber optic lines and underground utilities.1,R011SSIl0l1A1111.
AI1 111111.11 AT I110INS
Balmoral Avenue Extension, Rosemont: Project Manager/Project Engineer for the extension
American Society of Civil
Engineers
of Balmoral Avenue from 1-294 to O'Hare International Airport. The project involved carrying a
five -lane roadway section over the Wisconsin Central RR and Mannheim Road; then underneath
Chi Epsilon Civil Engineering
the airport's ATS system and connecting to Bessie Coleman Drive. The connection to Mannheim
Honor Society
Road included IDOT standard entrance and exit ramp terminals, an auxiliary/weaving lane
between the exit terminal and the ramp for eastbound 1-190 and the redesign of the entrance
Illinois Road & Transportation
ramp to eastbound 1-190. The connection of southbound Mannheim Road to Balmoral Avenue
Builders Association
included a fly under ramp below Mannheim Road. The project required Phase I and II design
Sigma Phi Delta Professional
and involved coordination with IDOT, FHWA, City of Chicago, Department of Aviation, Village of
Engineering Fraternity
Rosemont, Wisconsin Central RR, and FAA.
Delany Road, Lake County: Project Manager for the Phase I and Phase II design of the
reconstruction/add lane project on Delany Road from Sunset Avenue to Wadsworth Road
(2.6 miles). The project involved widening the existing two-lane rural roadway to a five -lane
urban section. The portion of the road located in the floodplain was raised above the 100 -
year flood elevation and the culverts were redesigned to pass the 100 -year event under the
road. Compensatory storage and detention was designed in accordance with the LCSMC's
requirements. Significant coordination was required with the Forest Preserve as two of the
detention basins and a bicycle underpass were located on their property.
Plainfield Road Improvements, Darien: Project Manager for widening and resurfacing of
Plainfield Rd at Bailey Rd to provide a new traffic signal and left turn lanes. This improvement
also included the resurfacing of Plainfield Rd from Manning Rd to Cass Ave, the replacement of
the watermain between Manning Rd and Williams St and drainage improvements at City Hall.
IL Route 53/Madison Street Improvements, Lombard: Project Manager for the widening and
resurfacing to provide a left and right turn lane and new traffic signals at the intersection. The
improvements also included the reconstruction of Madison St between IL 53 and Finley Road
with new curb and gutter, storm sewer, decorative lighting and sidewalk.
143rd Street Reconstruction, Orland Park: Project Manager for the reconstruction of 143rd
Street between Will/Cook Rd and Wolf Rd. The project converted the existing 2 lane road to
5 lane road with an 8' wide multi -use path. A new triple box culvert was constructed at the
crossing of Long Run Creek.
151st Street, Orland Park: Project Manager for the Phase I and Phase II design of the
reconstruction and widening of 151st Street between West Ave and Ravinia Ave. A two-way left
turn lane was added throughout the project limits and additional through and turn lanes and a
modernized traffic signal were included at Ravinia Ave.
Golf/New Wilke Road, Rolling Meadows: Project Manager for the reconstruction of the
intersection of IL 58 (Golf Road) and New Wilke Road, totaling over 4.3 lane miles of new
concrete pavement. The project included providing 3 exclusive through lanes in each direction,
dual left turn lanes eastbound, and exclusive right turn lanes both eastbound and westbound on
Golf Road. The traffic signal at the eastern project limits was removed and replaced, and along
�wVori:utca�sVoawr IEt. IIt urlcaw II:'.i.ruriruawawrirucg,
11ad. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 ( F: 847.823.0520 ( cbbeLcom
with the signal at New Wilke and interconnected to the Golf
Road system. Other improvements include new storm sewer
system, sidewalk, bike path, entrances, medians, short retaining
walls, landscaping and lighting system relocation.
Plum Grove Road, Rolling Meadows: Project Manager for
Phase II engineering services for reconstruction, widening and
intersection improvements of Plum Grove Rd from Emerson Ave
to Aldridge Ave, a distance of 2,800'(0.53 miles) as well as a new
closed drainage system. Plum Grove Rd was widened to provide
two through lanes in each direction with dual left -turn lanes at the
signalized intersections of Kirchoff Rd and Euclid Ave. Kirchoff Rd
was widened for dual right -turn lanes onto Plum Grove Rd. Euclid
Ave was widened to provide additional storage for the left -turn
lanes and to provide a southbound right -turn lane onto Plum
Grove Rd. Services included topographic survey, boundary, and
ROW location; traffic analysis; geotechnical investigation; utility
coordination; Plat of Highway and ROW coordination; preliminary,
pre -final and final plans, specifications and estimates.
Big Timber Road, Kane County: Project Manager for the
Phase I and Phase II design of the widening of Big Timber Road
and relocation of Tyler Creek. The redesign included widening
the 2 -lane rural cross-section to a 4 -lane rural section with 10'
shoulders. The widening required Tyler Creek to be relocated
for approximately 1,000' and its confluence with Pingree Creek
to be moved. The bridges over Tyler Creek and Pingree Creek
were removed and a single structure constructed past the new
confluence.
Butterfield Road (North), Lake County: Phase II Project
Manager for the reconstruction and widening of Butterfield Road
from Bull Creek to IL 137 (Buckley Road). Scope of improvements
included widening the existing two-lane rural section to a 5 -lane
section with curb and gutter, storm sewer, watermain, sanitary
sewer rehabilitation and replacement, detention facilities, median
landscape planter and utility relocations. Project also included
traffic signal modernization and improved channelization at the
intersections of Butterfield Rd and Winchester Rd and Butterfield
Rd and IL 137; and new traffic signals and channelization at the
intersection of Butterfield Rd and Virginia Ave. Permits were
required from LCSMC, USACE, IDOT and LCDOT. Coordination
was required with the public, individual homeowners, ICC/METRA
for railroad crossing, and various agencies including IDOT,
LCSMC, TEPA, and Village of Libertyville.
Green Bay/Wadsworth Road, Beach Park: Project Manager
for the Phase I and Phase II design of the intersection
improvements. In order to meet traffic demands of an adjacent
development and raise the road above the floodplain the
project was extended 3,000' to the west of the intersection
on Wadsworth Road. Detention and compensatory storage
was required in accordance with the Lake County Stormwater
Ordinance.
Bicycle/Multi-Use Paths: Involved in the design and project
management of several bicycle or multi -use paths or on -
street bike lanes for Bensenville, Crystal Lake, Downers Grove,
Naperville, Palatine, Rolling Meadows, Schaumburg, Skokie,
LCDOT and Lake County Forest Preserve.
Page 2 of 4
MUINIICIIIPAII_
Downtown Redevelopment, Lincolnshire: Project Manager
for the design and permitting of a detention pond and a
compensatory storage basin, retaining wall, and streambank
stabilization in Phase 1 and an access road and parking lot for a
future development in Phase 2. Additional work items included
storm and sanitary sewer lines, water main, site lighting, and
mass grading.
Schaumburg Convention Center Improvements: Project
Manager for the addition of new detention storage to
accommodate the Tollway's Meacham Road Interchange
project. The project included new 36" storm sewer, parking lot
reconstruction/reconfiguration, lighting, watermain relocation,
the expansion of 3 existing detention basins and porous
pavement to meet MWRD's new volume control requirements.
Lord Street Sewer Separation System, Elgin: Project Manager
for the construction of a storm sewer separation system. Project
consisted of separating the storm and sanitary sewers from a
combined sewer system. A 96" RCP was jacked in place under
US Route 20 to a new outfall of the storm sewer system into
the Fox River. Upstream of the 200' long tunnel, the sewer pipe
consisted of 430' of 10' by 5' box culvert, 2,600' of 66" RCP, 1700'
of 60" RCP and 1,100' of 48" RCP and appurtenant structures. In
addition, all of the streets where storm sewers were installed were
reconstructed with a concrete base course and HMA pavement
surface, curb and gutter replacement, 8" and 6" DIP water main
improvements where necessary, and parkway restoration.
North/Porter Road Rehabilitation, Elgin: Project Manager
responsible for day-to-day project management and point -
of -contact, including oversight and development of design,
permitting, construction document preparation, bidding
assistance and utility coordination. This project included the
replacement of existing water main with approximately 2,200'
of 8" ductile iron water main, water service, valve vault and
fire hydrant replacement, sanitary sewer repairs, street sign
upgrades, pavement patching, sidewalk, curb and gutter and
driveway removal and replacement and partial reconstruction
and resurfacing of approximately 8,000 LF of narrow, residential
roadway. CBBEL's team provided full -range civil engineering
services, including topographic survey, geotechnical investigation
and sewer televising, preliminary design development, utility
coordination, TEPA water and sewer permitting, preparation of
SWPPP, assistance with public involvement efforts, preparation
of construction documents, bidding assistance and full-time
construction engineering.
Pingree Road Reconstruction, Crystal Lake: Project Manager
for federal Phase II construction bid documents for the
reconstruction and widening of Pingree Rd from Rakow Rd to
US 14. Services included topographic survey; preliminary site
assessment for special waste; stormwater management report
including best management practices; construction plans,
specifications, and construction cost estimates. This project
utilized STP funding.
III
�wVori:utcaPVoawr IEt. IIt urlcaw Ilai;ruriruawawrirucg, 11ad. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbeLcom
Foster Avenue, Roselle: Project Manager for design, plan
preparation and utility coordination for improvements to Foster
Ave from Roselle Rd to Sycamore Ave (approximately 6,000'), plus
an additional 2,000' of work on intersecting side streets. Work
included pavement rehabilitation and resurfacing, construction of
a concrete edge band along pavement, ditch grading, driveway
and driveway culvert replacement, replacement of existing 6"
ductile iron water main with new 6" and 8" PVC water main,
sanitary sewer lining and miscellaneous drainage improvements.
Street Program, Rolling Meadows: Project Manager for
Annual Street Program including reconstruction and resurfacing,
drainage improvements, ADA improvements, utility repairs and
replacements and traffic signal improvements. Street Programs
are typically +/-$1 million in construction cost.
2009/2010 Street Improvement Program, Glendale Heights:
Project Manager for Phase II engineering services to rehabilitate
over 8 miles of residential streets. Bonds were secured by the
Village to complete $9 million of construction during a two
year span. Scope of work included complete topographic
survey, pavement analysis, culvert inspection, storm sewer and
sanitary sewer improvements, and pavement rehabilitation
recommendations. The 35 streets were then designed for
resurfacing, partial or full reconstruction.
S1"IRUC1"UIRAII....
Addison Creek Reservoir, MWRD: Design Manager for the
design of a 1,000 acre feet stormwater storage basin. The
project included an intake structure, pump station, weir, channel
improvement, two bridges, outlet/aeration structure, rock
excavation and retaining walls.
Kress Creek Culvert Replacements, West Chicago: Project
Manager for the design the replacement of 7 culvert locations.
One of the culvert crossings was under the Union Pacific's main
east -west line. Because rail shut down was not an option, the
5 — 72" steel culverts were specified to be direct jacked behind
a tunnel boring machine. Extensive coordination with the UPRR
was required. L.J. Keefe Co. and Midwest Mole, both tunneling
contractors, were consulted during the design process.
Construction cost was $4.9 million.
Orchard Place Improvements, Des Plaines: Project Manager
for design of a new roadway and bridge replacement. Project
consisted of removal of an existing cast -in -pace arch bridge
carrying Orchard Place over Willow Creek. The bridge was
replaced with a double 28' con -span culvert with an architectural
headwall and wingwalls. Decorative pedestrian lighting was then
constructed on the headwalls. The roadway was extended from IL
72 under an existing bridge carrying the Northwest Tollway.
Willow Creek Flood Wall, Rosemont: Project Manager for
soldier pile/precast floodwall system. An ADA accessible riverwalk
was constructed and connected to adjacent riverwalks. Due to
the size of the project, it was divided into five phases. The project
was permitted and partially funded by IDNR. Permits were also
required from USACE and IEPA.
Pogues Run Spillway, Indianapolis, IN: Design of a 500-cfs
reinforced concrete weir/spillway and pedestrian bridge crossing
at Pogues Run detention facility for a downtown development.
Page 3 of 4
Redmond Reservoir Spillways and Pedestrian Bridges,
Bensenville: Preliminary design and final design calculation
check for two 120' -long reinforced concrete spillways with 65-
70' -long pedestrian bridges crossing over each spillway.
PARKS AND SIf1f IE II:>[ESIIGIN
Pine Dunes Wetland Mitigation Area, Lake County, Illinois
Tollway: QA/QC Manager. Includes approximately 220 acres
of upland within the 315 acre parcel that are currently under
agricultural production or are woodlands comprised of white
oak, red oak and other hardwoods. The project involves wetland
creation, wetland enhancement, stream restoration, forest
enhancement and restoration, and restoration of upland areas to
prairie/savanna. The mitigation potential includes about 32 acres
of wetland enhancement, 58 acres of wetland restoration, and
20 acres of upland enhancement credit, 100 acres of woodland
enhancement, 3,300' of stream restoration, for a total of about 85
acres of wetland/waters mitigation credit. In addition to wetland
mitigation design and permitting services, CBBEL designed a 24
car parking lot, restroom, well, water fountain and nearly 3 miles
of bike path, along with a 300' long bridge and 3 boardwalks.
Hastings Lake Public Access Improvement (Phase II),
Lake Villa: Principal -in -Charge and QA/QC, responsible for
supervising the preparation of design plans, specifications and
other contract documents for improvements to the 250 acre
site which included providing 2.5 miles of asphalt path, 1.5 miles
of crushed stone trail, grading, five prefabricated boardwalk
structures, 5 parking lots totaling 140 stalls approximately
3,200' of paved internal roadway, boat launch and retaining
walls, 2 floating fishing piers with abutments, picnic shelter
site work, restroom site work and septic field, comfort station
site work, and lake overlooks. CBBEL provided land surveying,
geotechnical investigations, design, engineering, hydrologic/
hydraulic analysis, permitting and contract documents for
the improvements. As part of the access improvement at the
entrance to County Hwy A-11, a traffic study, turn bay road
widening and LCDOT access permits were engineered and
received approval. Also included in the design was 700' of
bituminous trail along Grass Lake Rd in LCDOT ROW, requiring
storm sewer with restrictor outlet, new curb/gutter & landscape
restoration per LCDOT standards.
Libertyville Campus Master Plan, Lake County: Project
Manager for preparation of a Master Plan and Planned
Unit Development for the County's 175 -acre Libertyville
Campus. Master Plan reflects current and future building,
site, transportation, environmental and infrastructure needs
to allow the County to continue to serve the constituents in
an efficient and sustainable manner. Managed all field work,
document preparation, meetings, presentations, and analysis
to obtain approval from Village of Libertyville. Scope included:
department workshops/interviews, topographic/boundary
survey, land planning: site access/circulation, building footprints/
parking, analysis, site capacity/impervious ratios, signage/way
finding, landscaping/buffers, zoning analysis, master plan, civil
engineering: wetland delineation, stormwater management
& detention, analysis, site utility analysis, traffic study, cost
estimating; environmental services: archaeological survey, drain
the survey; geotechnical study and PUD documents.
11B
C'hHslophm 113. Ilt nko II:Yn giroawaw in g, 11ad. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbeI.com
Lake Nippersink, Lake County: Project Manager for design and
permitting of improvements to Lake Nippersink just north of IL
Route 120 near Round Lake. LCFPD desired to create a natural
and active recreational environment including fishing, hiking
and picnicking. The major improvements included Limestone
fishing nodes; 2 floating docks/gangways; 1 mile of natural bank
stabilization and creation of an emergent shoreline planting
zone with over 20,000 emergent plugs; removal of an existing
land bridge; replacement of eight 24" culverts; over 900' of
rock bank stabilization for shoreline fishing areas; installation
of a precast concrete and steel carp guard on the lake's outlet
pipes; and an aeration system. CBBEL prepared concept design
alternatives and cost estimates. After the preferred alternate was
selected, CBBEL prepared construction documents as well as all
necessary hydraulic modeling to obtain the LCSMC permit for
the proposed improvements.
Safety Town, Roselle: Project Manager for the preliminary
design of a children's Safety Town. The facility included a 1,200
SF brick classroom building, working traffic signal and railroad
crossing signals, asphalt roadways, concrete sidewalks, 10
miniature brick buildings, decorative lighting and landscaping.
Main Street Streetscape, Roselle: Project Manager for design
and construction of new downtown streetscape improvements.
Scope of work involved new stamped colored concrete, precast
concrete planters and seat walls, decorative lighting, site
furniture and street resurfacing.
Parkside Park, Roselle: Project Manager/Construction Manager
for the design and construction. The project included storm
sewer, stormwater detention and park facilities for the Village
and Park District. A storm sewer system was constructed to
connect a new downtown development to the new detention
facility. Park features in the dry bottom pond included a
concrete skate park, a little league baseball field and a Miracle
League field. The Miracle League field was specially designed
for ADA accessibility to allow handicapped children to play
baseball. This project received the APWA Structure Project of
the Year (under $2 million).
Depke Juvenile Center, Lake County: Project Manager for
redevelopment. Improvements included realignment of entrance
roadway, new parking lot, lighting, landscaping, detention,
water quality improvements and utility relocations. Permits were
required from Lake County Zoning Department, LCSMC, IDOT,
and IEPA.
S"i'IRI1:..:.AIM II3AII' K S"i'AII3IIII....IIZA''i"IIOIIN
Willowwood Park Streambank Stabilization, Palatine: Project
Manager for the stabilization of Salt Creek through Willowwood
Park. Stabilization techniques varied from 9' high gabion walls
to grading, revegetating and bolder toe protection.
Lacey Creek Streambank Stabilization, Downers Grove:
Project Manager for the stabilization of several severely eroded
sections of Lacey Creek. Many of the areas involved old timber
retaining walls that were rotting and failing. Stabilization
techniques included replacing the failing timber walls with
segmental concrete block walls and bank regrading and
revegetation with native plants.
Page 4 of 4
Buffalo Creek, Wheeling: Project Manager for the stabilization
of 3,100' of Buffalo Creek using IEPA 319 Grant funding and local
funds. The project included a combination of bio -engineering
and structural stabilization techniques.
Willow Higgins Creek Relocation, O'Hare International
Airport: Project Manager for the design of the relocation of
Willow -Higgins Creek within the airport. The creek relocation
was part of the overall O'Hare Modernization Program. 13,300'
of the creek relocation was designed including 3,850' of
concrete box culvert, 5,200' of vertical or gabion walls, and
4,250' of open channel section. Coordination was required with
adjacent runway, roadway, and utility relocation projects.
Salt Creek Streambank Stabilization, Rolling Meadows: Project
Manager for three phases of streambank stabilization projects. A
comprehensive study of the entire 7.2 miles of creek was prepared
to outline the areas of severe erosion, recommendations for
repair and associated costs. Permits were required from IDNR
and USACE. Design included gabion basket walls and various
bioengineering techniques. The project utilized various grant
funding sources including TEPA 319 grants monies.
Long Lake Shoreline Stabilization, Lake County: Project
Manager for feasibility study and Phase II design on the shoreline
stabilization of 1,300' of Long Lake. The existing shoreline bank
was severely eroded from overland and roadway runoff and
the wave/ice action of the lake. A combination of techniques
were designed to permanently stabilize the bank including a
submerged stone shelf with emergent/submergent vegetation,
gabion basket, sheet piling and re -grading, and re -vegetating.
Wetland enhancement was also a component of the project,
which was partially funded through TEPA 319 Grant Program.
11
�wVori:utcaPVoawr IEt. IIt urlcaw II:'.i.ruriruawawrirucg, 11ad. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbeLcom
„ 1 , P E , C p::: III , C F) EC, CF)
Project Manager
Professional Engineer experienced in hydraulics and water resources engineering. As a Project
YIf::All?,S IEXIPIf 1Rlllf:'rlN(w.lf: 29
Manager, involved in civil and water resources engineering project analysis, planning and design.
YIf::All?,S WII CII II (w.lw:blw:blw::ll.... 29
Water resources engineering projects generally consist of watershed studies, project -specific
feasibility studies, IDNR-OWR Floodway Construction Permit applications, and FEMA LOMR or
f::11:3nce, C ll�lmll"�
Bachelor of Science, 984
LOMA, as well as dam safety permits and inspections. Responsible for supervision of other water
ring
Civil Engineering
resources engineers whose typical project tasks include developing hydrologic and h hydraulic
g yp p J p gy
University of Florida
models to establish floodplain and floodway limits and evaluation of flood -damage reduction
alternatives using steady-state models such as HEC -1, HEC -2, HEC -RAS, TR -20 and WSP-2 and
1:1IR0lf IES WAIL.. IRlfia3llS C IRAC 110 IN
unsteady flow models such as FEQ and XP -SWM M; preparation of DuPage County Stormwater
Professional Engineer, IL,
Management permit applications, MWRDGC permit applications. Civil Engineering duties include
062.052385, 1998
municipal engineering analysis and review of drainage projects, review of floodplain/floodway
and stormwater management requirements for proposed developments, and construction
tw.Il:plai 11 Ma 1101INS
Certified Floodplain Manager
observation of public and private improvements. Provides drainage review and performs drainage
IAFSM
studies for over 15 governmental bodies throughout the six county area.
Certified Professional in
FII...00ID COIPTT"IROII.... IPII...AII'VII'*ING & DIES11GIN S"i"i•JIIDIIIES
Erosion and Sediment Control
Huffman Street Flood Control Study, Naperville: Project Engineer (1996-1997) and Project
Certified Professional in
Manager (2000-2013). CBBEL served as the stormwater management consultant evaluating
Stormwater Quality,
alternative projects that would alleviate the flooding that the Huffman St residents experience
Envirocert International
when Country Common Park overflow swale overtops its western berm. Country Commons Park
is an an -line detention facility for Steeple Run Watershed Tributary. CBBEL developed alternative
G'IR0IF: 11111SSl110INAII•••ID111iiVllliill•••011:1lMllliill IN
projects for flooding, and DuPage County included the recommended project in the Steeple Run
ASCE: Advanced Unsteady
Watershed Plan. The recommended project has since been revised and now includes additional
Flow FEQ Analysis
storage at Country Commons and Springhill Parks, creating a storage facility at Clara Ray Farm,
ASCE: EPA SWMM v4.3
and a flood wall at County Commons Park. All project modeling was performed using FEQ model.
Modeling
ASCE: HSPF Modeling, USGS
Diversion Channel and Structure Optimization, Wheeling, Cook County: Project Manager. In
2002, CBBEL remapped the floodplain and floodway for Buffalo Creek (aka Wheeling Drainage
University of Wisconsin,
Madison — Unsteady Flow
Ditch) through the entire Village due to the then just completed William Rogers Memorial
Analysis with FEQ
Diversion Channel. The design and permitting of the Diversion Channel was completed by a
different consultant. IDNR-OWR was in the process of developing updated modeling as part ofPIR0F:If.:SS1110
WAIL.. AIF: llll...IIAC 1101IN
the Phase II Des Plaines River Feasibility Study. CBBEL obtained the IDNR-OWR hydrologic and
ASCE Illinois Section Director,
hydraulic models and updated them with the as -built diversion channel physical data (channel
1996-1998
cross sections, culvert crossing, and diversion weir). During the process, it was discovered that
IAFSM Floodplain Committee
the diversion weir structure was not diverting the design flow into the diversion channel. As
Chair, 2007-2012; Stormwater
a result, the Village directed CBBEL to analyze the system and make recommendations. The
Management Chair, 2012-2013;
analysis resulted in an optimization analysis of diverted flow versus diversion channel capacity
Secretary, 2013-2014; Treasurer,
and downstream benefits.
2014 -Present
Following the optimization modeling, CBBEL recommended a different weir geometry that AWAIRII:7"
could be accomplished by cost-effective and easily implementable saw -cutting into the APWA Project of the Year,
constructed sheet pile weir, resulting in an optimized flow being diverted in relation to the Environment, Huffman
diversion channel capacity. The tailwater effects of the Des Plaines Rivers were taken into Street Flood Control, City of
account in the CBBEL analysis, which were not previously analyzed during the design phase. Naperville, 2013
The remedial construction work was completed by the Public Works Department, and the APWA Project of the Year,
system was reported to function as designed during the September 2008 event. Environment, Buffalo
Creek Phase 1 Streambank
51"OIR'IMWA'i"IEJR IIVfIAINAGIEIKEIPTI" IPII...XINIP*ING S"i"UII HIES Stabilization, Village of
DuPage Campus Drainage Study: Project Engineer (1989-1993) and Project Manager (1993- Wheeling, 2011
2005). CBBEL has served (1989 -present) as the drainage consultant to DuPage County Department ASCE Illinois Section,
of Engineering for expansion improvements within the DuPage County Complex. Beginning in Outstanding Civil Engineering
1989, CBBEL evaluated an existing stormwater management facility design and recommended Achievement of the Year,
modifications to optimize existing and proposed storage; and bring the design to current and Spring Brook Meander, 2009
anticipated ordinance criteria. The hydrologic model developed for this task was the basis for Young Civil Engineer of the
FEQ unsteady flow model of DuPage County Complex Tributary included in the Winfield Creek Year, ASCE, 1998
Watershed Study, which was also completed by CBBEL. Subsequently, CBBEL enhanced the Donald C. Walker Scholarship,
FEQ model of DuPage County Complex to evaluate various projects within the watershed. This University of Florida
included numerous improvements that have occurred within DuPage County East Campus (war
memorial pond expansion, Ring Rd expansion, jail expansion), West Campus improvements,
proposed County Farm Rd underpass, proposed Jewel Rd improvements, and proposed Astor �i000uiii III
Place Wetlands Drainage improvements. The result has been an on-line stormwater storage uiiiiw uiil
IIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIO
and conveyance system (wet and dry -bottom ponds and interconnecting storm sewers) that IIIIIIIII� IIIIIIII
Christol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, II..:Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
EIRI K GIL, PE, CF:::�1\4x CF)ESC, CF)SWQ,
Page 2 of 5
functions a,aregional system tominimize flooding and meet
current DuPageCounty Ordinance criteria. Individual storm sewer
improvements were evaluated and designed using either orboth
Flossmoo,Sto,n`mmte,Management Analysis: Project
Manager for astudy todetermine the cause offlooding for ll
problem areas' identify appropriate flood reduction measures,
and develop opinions ofprobable cost. Performed a6e|6
assessment ofvarious reaches along Butterfield Creek within
Village limits toidentify areas ofxtneam6ankerosion, and
recommend typical remedial measures. Reviewed the Village's
current "Floodplain and Stormwater Management Code" and
made recommendations for revisions where necessary tobring
the ordinance regulations tocurrent standards. Prepared a
Hood damage questionnaire for distribution tn residents by the
Village, and assisted Village in tabulating the results. Reviewed
the BaUantraeSu66ivision stormwatermanagement plan, and
verified through a site visit the subdivision's drainage system was
constructed in substantial conformance with approved plans.
Eastside TIF District Drainage Study, Prospect Heights:
Project Manager. The purpose ofthis study was toevaluate
the existing storm sewer system and tuevaluate alternatives
toimprove the drainage within the watershed area toalleviate
flooding. The scope addressed the problem oflocalized flooding
caused 6yxtormvvaterrunoff, but not the problem ofoverbank
flooding from the adjacent Des Plaines River. The study methods
used consisted nffield reconnaissance, field surveying, and
hydrologic (USA[EHEC-1)and hydraulic modeling <USGS
FE[8.The unsteady -state FE[>hydraulic model was chosen
because the tai|watereffects within the storm sewer system are
better simulated using anunsteady-flow model. The proposed
recommendation includes televising and cleaning the 36^'48^
RCP storm sewer system from River Trails Condominiums tothe
Willow Woods West Detention Basin, installing a48^RCP storm
sewer line from the existing 12^RCP storm sewer atApple Drto
the Des Plaines River along Apple Dr, and modifying the outlet
structure ofWillow Woods West Detention Basin 6yreplacing the
48^RCP outlet pipe and lowering the invert ofthe storm sewer
6y1' Bycleaning the storm sewer line, flooding will 6ereduced in
the River Trails Condominiums and Willow Woods Condominiums.
Byinstalling the 48^RCP along Apple Dr, flooding will 6ereduced
inthe River Trails Condominiums center parking lot and along
Apple Dr.
�"REAMBXINK 51WBU0ZA'0GIN
Buffalo Creek Phase 1St,eam6ankStabilization, Wheeling,
Cook County: Project Manager from planning through
construction. CBBELand VVBKanalyzed stream conditions,
developed aconcept plan for the entire creek, prepared
an|EPAgrant application, surveyed the creek, prepared
construction drawings, assisted with public involvement phase,
coordinated grant administration with CK4AP, and provided
bidding and construction observation services. Objectives of
the recommended actions were to: reduce erosion ofstream
banks; reduce non -point source pollutants including sediments
generated from stream bank erosion and in -stream sediment
movement; and enhance water quality and improve aquatic
habitat toincrease the aquatic biodiversity.
During the planning and assessment stages, the project team
conducted multiple meetings with owners and stakeholders
along the entire length ofBuffalo Creek within the corporate
limits todiscuss results ofthe study and toallow further input
directly from the neighborhood. Following the initial public
involvement, Village staff and their consultants proceeded to
acquire funding for the project. The est. construction cost for
the entire 5miles ofstream was substantial, and funding was not
readily available toimplement the entire stream; subsequently
the funding acquisition stage resulted inthe need todivide
the stream into three projects. The completion of Phase 1 has
resulted inover 3'0O0LFofstream channel being improved
utilizing both structural and bio -technical techniques tostabilize
and enhance the riparian corridor, reduce loss ofreal estate, and
improve water quality and aquatic habitat inBuffalo Creek.
Spring Brook Meander, FPDDC: Water Resources Project
Manager for planning and design. Sp,ingbmokPrairie Forest
Preserve isa 1'867 acre natural area in Naperville that isowned
6yFPDDC.The preserve accepts gormwoterrunoff from approx.
9square miles ofthe upstream urbanized watershed. Spring
Brook No. 2,atributary toWest Branch ofthe DuPageRiver, flows
through the middle ofthe preserve. Within the preserve, roughly
2miles ofthe stream was previously ditched inthe 192O'uto
serve asalinear outfall for alarge tile network that was installed
for agricultural purposes. 8ythe 199O'sthe ditched channel in
some areas had been widened 6yerosion roughly 15to30''had
incised upto6'6eep'and was continuing todegrade inbiological
diversity, largely due tnexcessive volumes ofaccumulated silt
deposits. The FPDDC decided that this previously channelized
stream needed toborestored. The primary goal was tocreate
nearly 2miles ofmeandering stream with associated natural
features such osriffles, pools, and riparian wetlands, which would
enhance fish, mollusk and macro invertebrate habitat. However,
the project also accommodated asuccessful cooperative effort
between the FPDDCand the City ofNaperville, with respect
tointersection improvements atnearby 83rd Stand Book Rd.
The City agreed toreplace amajor box culvert for the benefit of
the project, and FPDDCagreed toprovide wetland mitigation
and compensatory floodplain storage for the City inreturn.
The FPDDCretained amulti-disciplinary team ofprofessionals
comprised of[BBEL'Blue Mountain Consultants, & Black Creek
Hydrology toplan, design, and permit the improvements. This
type mfproject required particular expertise inthe fields offluvial
geomorphology, hydrology, stream hydraulics & aquatic biology.
Design called for extensive useofnatura|conxtrucdonmateha|s,
including removal and re -use ofundesirable and invasive Eurasian
black alder trees that lined the banks ofpreviously straightened
ditch. Trunks and motwa6softhese trees were used toprotect
the re -graded stream banks against erosion. Acoir-fabric "burrito
wrap" was installed inacontinuous 10'+wiclestrip along the
entire length ofnew channel todefine bank full width, reduce
risk oferosion and minimize sediment transport while bank
vegetation became established. Buried rock sills spanning the
entire floodplain width were installed atintervals ofapprox.
7OO',perpendicular toflow direction, toenable the stream io
migrate freely within the floodplain. The substrate bed of new
stream channel was lined with unsorted sand, gravel, and cobble
imported from another FPDDC project. ��! I
11111110� 1��!
1111111MI 11111111
Christol::)her IB Burke Engineering, i Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
WA"i"IEIR°SIHIEID IRII...AININIIN w S"i"i.11llDIIIES
Tributary No. 4, West Branch DuPage River: Project Engineer
responsible for FEQ/DEC-1 feasibility analysis. Coordinated cross-
section and bridge/culvert/control structure field survey for input
to the unsteady hydraulic model and the building survey for input
to the DEC -1 economic model. Responsible for development of
the land use/land cover delineation in digital form, FEQ baseline
model input, alternative project analysis, and benefit/cost project
relationships. The alternative designs included meeting IDNR-
OWR Dam Safety requirements for Class III dams.
Winfield Creek: Project Manager/Engineer responsible for FEQ/
DEC -1 feasibility analysis. Coordinated cross-section and bridge/
culvert/control structure field survey and data collection for use
in the FEQ unsteady flow model and the building survey for
input to the DEC -1 economic model. Developed FEQ hydraulic
model and DEC -1 economic model, alternative projects analysis
(3 alternatives for each of the 9 defined reaches), benefit/cost
project analysis, and watershed plan document. Prepared
comment -response document associated with the public review
period. Preliminary engineering analysis included a wetland
mitigation banking site with approx. 150 acres of wetland area.
Spring Brook No. 2: Technical reviewer responsible for
assisting the project engineer in the development of the FEQ
hydraulic model for the watershed located within Naperville,
Aurora, and FPDDC property.
C:aIR°AIIINAGE IFIEASIIBIIII....I"i"Y S"i"UIIDIIIES
Thompson Berm Drainage Study, Wheaton: Project Manager
responsible for coordination and technical assistance for
drainage feasibility analysis. The existing berm was constructed
and is currently maintained by the City to protect the adjacent
low-lying residential properties along Morse St from Winfield
Creek flood waters. The interior drainage is managed by a
lift station which pumps stormwater to a manhole structure
in the berm. The system required the constant maintenance
and assistance from the Public Works staff including bringing
in an additional pump to evacuate the ponded interior runoff.
Through TR -20 modeling, various alternatives were investigated,
and the recommended alternative consisted of: raising the
berm at low spots to provide a higher level of protection from
Winfield Creek, extending the force main from the lift station
to discharge directly downstream of the berm, regrading 2
overflow paths between 2 residential homes, modifying street
grades to prevent interbasin flow, and rerouting an existing 24"
RCP storm sewer and upsizing the existing 15" RCP storm sewer
to a 27" RCP. The City decided to implement the recommended
plan; CBBEL prepared design drawings.
DuPage County Campus Feasibility Study: Project Manager/
Engineer. Performed a drainage feasibility analysis of the
DuPage County East and West Campus to evaluate various
proposed improvements within the watershed. Refined FEQ
model developed for the Winfield Creek Watershed Study
and developed a NEC -1 model to design for the 100 -year
flood event. The study incorporated the impacts of a drainage
improvement project, a road improvement project, and various
infrastructure and building construction projects within the
campus; and also identified 6 alternative location sites for
stormwater storage mitigation.
„ 1 , P E , C p::: III , C F) EC, CF)
Page 3 of 5
Pitner Avenue and Bloners Drive Drainage Improvements,
Cuba Township: Project Manager/Engineer. Performed a
drainage feasibility analysis and developed feasible flood -damage
mitigation projects which met a specific budget constraint.
Several feasible stormwater management projects were identified
in the study. Due to budget constraints for the total project cost,
set by Cuba Township, the recommended project alleviated much
of the flooding problem existing within the watershed but not all.
The feasibility analysis was performed and documented in such
a manner that when additional funds become available, other
projects can be undertaken. The recommended project included
a diversion pipe in the vicinity of Pitner Ave and Bloners Dr with
a total construction cost (including design) of approx. $125,000.
Public involvement consisted of several meetings with affected
property owners. Other CBBEL staff prepared design drawings
and the project has been constructed under budget.
SPECIIAIL STUDIES
Salt Creek Comparison Study, DuPage County: Project
Manager/Engineer for a comprehensive comparison study
performed for DuPage County DEC. The purpose of the study
was to compare the traditional approach of floodplain mapping
which typically uses steady-state HEC 1 and HEC -2 models
to a more state-of-the-art modeling system consisting of the
unsteady -state FEQ hydraulic model, the USGS HSFP hydrologic
model, and the PVSTATS statistical analysis program to compute
flood -frequency flows and water -surface elevations at specific
cross-section locations. The study will be reviewed by IDNR-
OWR and FEMA as part of the decision-making process to
allow DuPage County to use the HSFP/FEQ/PVSTATS approach
to mapping floodplains. Project tasks included developing 3
watershed FEQ hydraulic models, calibrating and verifying using
18 historical events and a continuous gage record, and statistical
analysis calculations and graphical plots.
HYDROLOGY AIIVD IH"yIDRALYI....ICS S"i"UIIDIIIES
Upper Salt Creek Regulatory Study, IDNR-OWR: Part of a
multi -discipline project team performing a Phase I study of
the 50 -square mile Upper Salt Creek watershed floodplain.
Responsibilities included the preparation of over 130 hydraulic
structure tables (e.g., culvert crossings, weirs, on-line detention
structures, etc.) with the FEQ utility program (FEQUTL) to
serve as input for the unsteady flow modeling part of Phase
II. Also defined all contributing areas to each FEQ branch and
constructed an updated land use table to serve as part of the
input file for the HSPF continuous simulation program.
Ashbury Subdivision, Naperville: Responsible for preparation
of existing -conditions hydrology and hydraulics. Project
consisted of first defining the extent of all upstream contributing
areas and identifying all existing structures; second, preparing
the input data requirements to the SCS TR -20 hydrologic
model and the SCS WSP-2 hydraulic model by describing the
watershed characteristics through a field reconnaissance and
TR -55 methods, and by tabulating the stream cross-sectional
data using a topographic map. The purpose of this study was
to delineate the floodplain and floodway within the site and
determine the existing -conditions associated storage.
il
";;hristol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
West Branch DuPage River: Responsible for preparation of the
existing conditions HEC -1 hydrologic model and HEC -2 hydraulic
model for the upper watershed located within the Villages
of Hanover Park and Schaumburg. Special features of the
watershed include a 230 acre-feet off-line MWRDGC reservoir,
an 1800' long box culvert enclosure of the stream, and several
reaches with channel improvements. The purpose of this study
was to remap a defined reach of the West Branch DuPage River
within the Village of Hanover Park.
EIINCwlIIN” E IEJR 11 IN G IRIEVIIIEW SIEJRVIICIES
Village of Carol Stream (1992 -Present): Responsible for
reviewing the stormwater management of proposed projects
with respect to the DuPage County Countywide Stormwater and
Flood Plain Ordinance.
Village of Addison (1992 -Present): Responsible for reviewing
the stormwater management of proposed projects with respect
to the DuPage County Countywide Stormwater and Flood Plain
Ordinance.
Permit Review, IDNR-OWR: Responsible for reviewing permit
applications for IDNR-OWR for a 6 month period. Duties
included a complete technical review of hydrologic and hydraulic
models, documentation of all correspondence regarding the
review and the data request letters issued to the applicants, and
coordinating members of CBBEL staff to assist in review process.
Additional responsibilities included assisting the applicants'
engineer to revise their plans, specifications, and hydraulic
models to meet the necessary criteria for construction approval
within the regulatory floodway.
City of Naperville (1992-2002): Responsible for reviewing the
stormwater management of proposed projects with respect to
the DuPage County Countywide Stormwater and Flood Plain
Ordinance.
City of Prospect Heights (1995-2005): As a consultant to the
City, responsible for reviewing stormwater management aspects
of proposed projects and any proposed floodway work as part
of IDNR-OWR's delegation program authorizing communities to
approve floodway activities meeting the regulations of 92 Illinois
Administrative Code Part 708. Also responsible for project
review with respect to the City's participation in the National
Flood Insurance Program. Construction observation services
were provided on an as -needed basis for compliance with
floodplain regulations.
SIEDIIIIVfIIEIPTI'A''i"IIOIIN AlIVID IBROSIIOIIN 511YIDIIIES
Maumee River, Allen County, IN: Responsible for evaluating
the sedimentation and deposition potential in a proposed flood
control side -channel . The USACE HEC -6 Scour and Deposition
model was used by taking the inflow hydrographs from the NWS
DWOPER unsteady flow model and using a modified HEC -2
input deck to evaluate the potential for increased sedimentation
as a result of the project. Data input included preparing the
gradation of material in the stream bed from particle size
distributions of bottom sediment samples (sampling done by
others), defining the reinflowing sediment load using Tofaletti's
bed load function, & establishing a downstream operating rule.
„ I , P E , C I::: III , C I„°) I°;;;,° C , CI„°)
Page 4 of 5
IDUR-OWR IFIL.00DWAY COIINS"i"IRUC"i"IIOIIN IPIEIRMII"i"
APPLICATIGINS AlVID FEMA II...OIIVOIRS
Buffalo Creek Physical Map Revision through Wheeling,
Cook County: Project Manager. In 2002, CBBEL remapped
the floodplain and floodway for Buffalo Creek (aka, Wheeling
Drainage Ditch) through the entire Village due to the then just
completed William Rogers Memorial Diversion Channel. The
design and permitting of the Diversion Channel was completed
by a different consultant. The IDNR-OWR was in the process
of developing updated modeling as part of the Phase II Des
Plaines River Feasibility Study. CBBEL obtained the IDNR-OWR
hydrologic and hydraulic models and updated them with the
as -built diversion channel physical data (channel cross sections,
culvert crossing, and diversion weir). The study area for this
LOMR request (which FEMA made into a Physical Map Revision
due to its large area of impact) extends from the mouths of
Buffalo Creek (aka Wheeling Drainage Ditch) and the Diversion
Channel at the Des Plaines River up to corporate limits of the
Village of Wheeling near the Horcher Farm. The floodway was
mapped based on a conveyance floodway, as CBBEL assisted
in developing an agreement between the Village and the State
allowing this type of floodway because the Village agreed to
enforce compensatory storage within the floodplain.
Klein Creek Study, Carol Stream: Responsible for preparation
of the existing and proposed conditions alternative analyses
hydrology and hydraulics of the headwaters of Klein Creek
watershed. Project consisted of: subdividing the approx.
3.5 square miles of contributing area into 19 subbasins and
computing the associated hydrologic parameters; identifying all
existing structures and computing the corresponding stage -
storage -discharge relationship for each; coupling the SCS TR -20
hydrologic model and the USACE HEC -2 hydraulic model in
an iterative procedure to produce a baseline condition; and
evaluating alternative designs for the project site. At the request
of DuPage County and the Village, several designs for an on-
line stormwater reservoir were modeled using both the time
distribution of point rainfall and the time distribution of areal
mean rainfall in Huff third -quartile storms. After the approval and
recommendation of one of the designs by Village and County
staff, a complete joint permit application to USACE, IDNR-OWR
and TEPA was prepared and submitted, and a LOMR request was
submitted to FEMA.
Squaw Creek, Round Lake Park: Sized proposed lakes
within the project reach on the overbanks of Squaw Creek to
accommodate compensatory/detention storage requirements.
Determined floodplain/floodway boundaries within the project
site and prepared a permit application report for IDNR-OWR.
Seavey Drainage Ditch, Vernon Hills: Junior Engineer for the
design of channel modifications. Assisted the senior hydraulic
engineer in containing the floodway within the channel. Also
designed a weir structure to back-up water in order to meet
storage requirements, and prepared the report for an IDNR-
OWR permit application.
il
";;hristol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
Tributary D West Branch Salt Creek, Elk Grove Village:
Responsible for managing a hydraulic analysis to update the
FEMA maps through an entire tributary within Elk Grove Village.
Prepared the FEMA MT -1 and MT -2 forms necessary for both a
LOMR and LOMA.
Tributary A West Branch Salt Creek, Hoffman Estates:
Reviewed and modified the regulatory WSP-2 and FLOODWAY
models for Tributary A to determine the impacts of removing
and/or replacing 4 restrictive culvert crossings. After adding
additional cross-sections to the regulatory models and
evaluating several culvert designs, the recommended and
approved alternative was to replace 3 culverts and remove 1. A
report was prepared for an IDNR-OWR permit application and
the permit was issued within 4 weeks of submittal.
Long Run, Will County: Responsible for sizing a proposed
100' span bridge structure across Long Run and a proposed
double -celled reinforced -concrete -box -culvert crossing for a
tributary to Long Run. Worked with wetland specialist to design
an overbank wetland habitat within the property site to provide
compensatory/detention storage requirements, and prepared
the report for an IDNR-OWR permit application.
E X IP IE R 1” WI11"II'14IESS
Clara Ray Farm, Naperville: Provided testimony through a
deposition regarding flooding for a site that now serves as part
of a flood control project for the City of Naperville.
„ 1 , P E , C p::: III , C F) EC, CF)
Page 5 of 5
il
("hristol::)her If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
M I C I,,,,,I A E L B U R K E, I„°) E, C ` I::: 1A, C I„°)
Water Resources Engineer
Water Resources Engineer responsible for water resources engineering project analysis and
YIf::AII S IEXIPIfi'rlR111:'rlNCw.lf: 6
design. Duties include the following hydrologic and hydraulic engineering tasks: land use
YIf::AIIRS WII CII II (w.lw:blw:blw::ll.... 6
characterization, flood plain/floodway delineation, detention and compensatory storage
determination, steady and unsteady hydraulic analyses, and design of conveyance systems.
f::II:3ceC ll2001111
Master of Science,
Computer Skills include: HEC -HMS, HEC -1, HEC -RAS, HEC -2, HY-8, Hydraflow, TR -20,
Civil Engineering
Southern Illinois
XPSWMM, InfoSWMM, ArcGIS, MicroStation.
University, Carbondale
Levee 37 Drainage Study, Mount Prospect: Project Engineer responsible for hydrologic and
Bachelor of Science, 2009
hydraulic analysis of drainage area behind Levee 37. Developed detailed XPSWMM 2D model
Civil Engineering
to analyze local flooding in the area behind Levee 37 where the Des Plaines River reduces or
Southern Illinois
eliminates gravity sewer flow. Developed several alternatives to help alleviate flooding problem.
University, Carbondale
Prepared drainage study report, exhibits, and presentation.
11:1 IES IIP If (311115 f IRAC 110 IN
Villa Park Comprehensive Flood Plan: Project Engineer responsible for analyzing flood and
Professional Engineer, IL,
combined sewer issues in the Washington Street Corridor using XPSWMM. Developed several
062.066808, 2014
improvement alternatives to both reduce flooding and eliminate combined sewer overflow to
Salt Creek.
(:IE• II�''C'Illl II (�`�•�C II��II'�up~
Certified Floodplain Manager
IL Route 53 Pump Station, Lombard: Project Engineer responsible for analyzing impacts of
IAFSM, IL -13-00651
the proposed IL 53 pump station discharging to the East Branch of the DuPage River. Analysis
Certified Professional in
included incorporating study area XPSWMM modeling with hydrologic and hydraulic models of
Stormwater Quality,
the EBDR. Developed a pump operating rule to eliminate possible EBDR downstream impacts.
Envirocert International
Helped obtain project approval from DuPage County,
PIRC)IF: 1f.: SSII0INAII... 11.) IE V1f:11...0If1IMIf::IN C
Stormwater Master Plan, Wheeling: Project Engineer responsible for hydrologic and
IAFSM Conference,
hydraulic analysis of 11 study areas. Developed two XPSWMM models for critical study areas
2015, 2014, 2012
using advanced 2D hydraulic surface modeling to analyze flooding. Provided assistance to
Village in developing new stormwater utility fee. Prepared stormwater master plan report and
CE 370 Fluid Mechanics,
presentation.
Laboratory Instructor,
Southern Illinois University,
ComEd Station 13, Crawford: Project Engineer responsible for proposed stormwater drainage
Carbondale, 2011
design for new 4 -acre substation in Chicago. Successfully obtained stormwater management
ENGR 351 Numerical Methods,
permit from City of Chicago.
Graduate Assistant,
Comprehensive Sewer Study, Riverside: Project Engineer responsible for model
Southern Illinois University,
Carbondale, 2010
development and preparation of final project report. Scope included development of an Info
SWMM sewer model of the Village of Riverside's entire combined and storm sewer system.
Pelf:' 11llll("AC 111 1IN
"Use of Unsteady Modeling
Addison Creek Drainage Improvements, MWRDGC: Assisted with creation and evaluation
to Predict Flooding by
of XPSWMM model for existing sewer systems in Melrose Park and Stone Park for purpose of
Correlating Stream Gages:
developing alternatives to reduce flooding.
A Case Study", Burke, M;
(Master's Thesis); 2011
Chateau Woods Detention Analysis, Dyer, IN: Used XPSWMM modeling to analyze poorly
drained dry -bottom detention pond. Developed several improvement alternatives andf1IIP0F:IfiSS1110
WAIL.. AIF: 1111...IIAC 111114
demonstrated the benefit of connecting existing detention outlet pipe to a proposed pump
American Society of Civil
station.
Engineers, Illinois Section of
EE&WR Technical Group
Elgin -O'Hare West Bypass, IDOT: Project Engineer. Prepared HEC -HMS hydrologic models
Illinois Association for
and HY-8 hydraulic models to analyze minor waterway crossings as part of the LDS. Developed
Floodplain and stormwater
methodology for median ditch design in Microsoft Excel incorporating Rational Method and
Management
Manning's Equation to design proposed median ditches along proposed Elgin O'Hare corridor.
Smith Ditch Culvert Replacement Project, Crown Point, IN: Project involved design of 3 new
culvert crossings through Stillwater Subdivision using HEC -RAS hydraulic modeling software.
The previous crossings were installed without permits. A floodway construction permit was
obtained from Indiana DNR.
1-90 Roadway Widening Project, IDOT: Project Engineer. Performed minor waterway crossing
analyses for Tyler Creek West Tributary and Tyler Creek East Tributary culvert crossings
under 1-90 near Gilberts. Tasks included development of HEC -HMS and HEC -RAS models to
analyze existing culverts and develop proposed culvert design. Also determined required
compensatory storage and performed detention analysis.
";;hristol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Ii Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
M 1 C I A E L B U R K E, F) E, C p::: 1A, C F)
Page 2 of 2
ComEd Station 16, Waukegan: Performed multiple
engineering tasks for proposed 10 -acre Com Ed substation pad
Tasks included existing BFE determination through project
site, development of project site grading plan, and storm water
conveyance and detention design. Existing BFE determination
was approved by LCSMC.
Amherst Drive Proposed Storm Sewer, Bartlett: Project
involved design of proposed 30" storm to alleviate flooding
at Bartlett Rd and Amherst Dr. Proposed sewer discharges
to Country Creek in DuPage County. Performed TR -20 and
HEC -RAS analysis of Country Creek for existing and proposed
conditions to obtain stormwater management permit.
Plum Creek/Hart Ditch Early Warning System and Flood
Forecasting, Lake County Surveyors Office, Dyer, IN:
Created stream gage correlation between 2 USGS stream
gages to predict flooding as part of Master's Thesis Project at
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. Stream gages used
for correlation were located at Burrville Rd on Plum Creek and
213th St on Hart Ditch. Converted steady state model of Plum
Creek/Hart Ditch to unsteady state model. Calibrated model to
accurately simulate maximum stage heights at each gage for a
particular storm event. Simulated 40 large storm events using
unsteady model to create correlation between the two gages.
Stream gage correlation is currently used to predict flooding in
downstream Dyer during large storm events.
Lower Des Plaines River Detailed Watershed Plan,
MWRDGC, Cook County: Project involved complete
hydrologic and hydraulic analysis. Collected data within the
watershed for modeling purposes. Delineated inundation
areas throughout watershed to represent benefits provided by
proposed improvements recommended in the study.
Flood Reduction Assessment (25-, 50-, and 100 -year),
Winnetka: Project Engineer responsibilities included XPSWMM
modeling, exhibit and presentation preparation. Project
included a Village -wide drainage study in response to July 2011
flood. Improvements were recommended for 3 levels of flood
protection from the 25-, 50-, and 100 -year storm events.
il
Christol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
I ,,,,, L) K E S F -III E R R Y, F) E , C ` p::: III , C F) E S C `
Senior Water Resources Engineer
//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%/////%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%/////////////////OA//////////.�"//iO."//.�"//.�"�������19/��'0/•1Y'�9/�/•1Y'/.;r%^/•1Y'/•1Y"/•1Y"�Yb�(P(P(P(P(P(P(P(%'f fY'.�d0.�d0.��d.��d.��&Q6'r6�'M"/(//,��;Y�;Y�;Y�;Y�'ft�;f�Nllflllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Water Resources Engineer responsible for water resources engineering project analysis and YIf:::AIRS IEXIPIf 1Rlllf:°:IN(w.lE: 13
design. Duties include performing the following hydrologic and hydraulic engineering tasks: Ylfi::AIRS WII CII II (w.lf:'ulf:'ulfr11. 13
land use characterization, flood plain/floodway delineation, detention and compensatory storage
determination, steady and unsteady hydraulic analyses, and design of conveyance systems. f:::II:3�e111011'4Bachelor of Science, 2004
Computer skills include ArcMap, HEC -1, HEC -2, HEC-GeoRAS, HEC -HMS, HEC -RAS, HY-8, Civil Engineering
Hydraflow, SWMM, TR -20, WSP-2, XP-SWMM, and InfoSWMM. Purdue University
SEWER M0IDIEII...HNG AIINID RI 00D IRIEIDUC1'101I14 S"i"fYDIIIE.S
PIR 0lF:111 11101NAII... IR If. C311IS C IRAC 110114
Professional Engineer, IL,
Comprehensive Flood Plan, Elmhurst: Project involved a comprehensive stormwater study
062.063231, 2011
that included a complete hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of storm sewer networks within 10
flood problem areas, compensatory storage analysis, flood proofing options, and review of the
(w.II:::IR CII IP11("AC 111 1IN
City's current stormwater regulations. Existing storm sewer networks and proposed drainage
Certified Floodplain Manager,
improvements were modeled using XP-SWMM computer software. An FEQ hydraulic analysis was
IAFSM
performed for those drainage improvements that resulted in increased flows to Salt Creek. Cost
estimates were developed for proposed drainage improvements and a comparison was made to
Certified Professional in
the cost of individual house flood proofing. Project also included a review of current stormwater
Erosion and Sediment Control
practices required by the City and recommended revisions to City Ordinance were provided.
"IIz4;1If lfr':;a p ll�ll'4"uAll••• II.:bIE;kVIE;iII•••1IfIIvnlE;ill'+"r"
Ethics in City Government,
Westwood Drive, Orland Park: Project included analysis of an existing storm sewer system
Ethics Training for CDA/OMP
and detention basins to develop alternatives for drainage improvements. The existing storm
Contractors, Vendors
sewer network and detention storage basin in the subdivision were modeled using XP-SWMM
and Employees
computer software to determine flooding areas. Recommendations were made for proposed
storm sewer improvements to alleviate the flooding.
PR0lf lE SS11110INAll... AIf If II II...IIA1 I110IN"
Illinois Association for
Preserve of Palatine Condominiums, Palatine: Project included an analysis of a proposed
Floodplain and Stormwater
storm sewer system tying into an existing storm sewer system. The storm sewer network was
Management
modeled using XP-SWMM computer software to determine the effects of the proposed storm
sewer system. This project included coordination with MWRDGC.
Skokie River Drain Tile Replacement Study, Lake County: Project involved a complete
hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of drain tiles located at the headwaters of the Skokie River.
The existing drain tile system was analyzed along with several drain the replacement alternatives
that included larger drain tile sizes and potential flood storage sites. The hydrologic analysis
was completed using HEC -1 computer software and the hydraulic analysis was completed using
HEC -2, HY-8, and Hydraflow computer software. Project included coordination with LCSMC and
the East Skokie Drainage District.
Lake Bluff Flood Storage Feasibility Study, Lake County: Project involved a complete
hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of a potential flood storage site along the Skokie River. A total
of 5 reservoir sizes were analyzed, ranging from a wetland, gravity -drained reservoir to a large,
pump -evacuated reservoir. Flood profiles of the Skokie River were developed for proposed
reservoir sizes and were compared to existing flood profile to determine the effectiveness of
each reservoir size. The hydrologic analysis was completed using HEC -1 computer software
and the hydraulic analysis was completed using HEC -2 computer software. Project included
coordination with LCSMC and the East Skokie Drainage District.
Lower Des Plaines River Detailed Watershed Study, Cook County: Project involved a
complete hydrologic and hydraulic analysis. The hydrology of the watershed was modeled using
HEC -HMS computer software and included digital output to be used as input in the hydraulic
model. An unsteady HEC -RAS hydraulic model was developed to determine the limits of the
2-, 5-, 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, 500 -year inundation areas. HEC-GeoRAS computer software was used
to develop the cross-section geometry for input into the hydraulic model. Project included
coordination with MWRDGC.
01RID1111"JAII"JCIE DIEVIE11 0 P M E IN 1"
Technical Guidance Manual for the Watershed Management Ordinance, MWRD, Cook
County: Senior Water Resource Engineer responsible for development of the Technical
Guidance Manual (TGM) to accompany the Watershed Management Ordinance (WMO), in
collaboration with MWRD. Project involved the creation of technical guidance for stormwater
management, flood plain/floodway, riparian environment, and wetland submittals under the °i V
WMO, and also included the development of all permit forms, checklists, template hydrologic ullliw °°1°° l
models and other resources. Additionally, the project also involved numerous public training °°uu'
Y p 1 P g IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Christol::zher If:',.. If:',Lairizc: Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
seminars that covered the WMO, TGM, and HEC -HMS
hydrologic modeling.
DuPage County Stormwater Ordinance: Worked on complete
overhaul of County Stormwater Ordinance to reflect the current
and future development conditions in DuPage County. The
revised ordinance was developed with input from the Steering
Committee made up of municipal engineers and County staff.
H1(IDR0I...OGIC AIP4D IHYDRAUI....IC AINAII...YSIES
Las Fuentes Development, Richton Park: Performed
hydrologic and hydraulic analyses to determine floodplain,
detention requirements, and compensatory storage
requirements of project site. TR -20 hydrologic modeling and
HEC -RAS hydraulic modeling was used.
Sequoit Creek Watershed, Lake County: Project involved
updating a steady-state HEC -RAS hydraulic model into an
unsteady NEC -RAS hydraulic model for the entire watershed.
Project included coordination with LCSMC.
Eagle Creek, Round Lake Drain, and Long Lake Watershed
Study: Project included a complete hydrologic and hydraulic
analysis for the entire watershed. The hydrology of watershed
was modeled using NEC -1 computer software and included
digital output to be used as input in the hydraulic model.
An unsteady HEC -RAS hydraulic model was developed to
determine the limits of the 100 -year and 500 -year floodplain and
the 100 -year floodway. HEC-GeoRAS computer software was
used to develop the cross-section geometry for input into the
hydraulic model. Project included coordination with LCSMC.
Downtown Redevelopment, Lake Zurich: Project involved
a stormwater detention analysis for the redevelopment
of downtown Lake Zurich. A TR -20 hydrologic model was
developed to determine the required detention volume based
on Lake County Watershed Development Ordinance and Village
of Lake Zurich Ordinance.
TCB Development, Joliet: Project included an existing Base
Flood Elevation Analysis for Cedar Creek. A TR -20 hydrologic
model was developed to determine the detention volume
required under the Will County Stormwater Ordinance.
Incremental compensatory storage for floodplain fill on the
project site was also determined. Project included coordination
with the City of Joliet.
S"i"OIR°IMWA'i"IEJR IEINGUNIEIEJRIIP4G RIEVIIIEWS
McHenry County Division of Transportation: Performed
stormwater permit application reviews for compliance with
the McHenry County Stormwater Ordinance. Also provided
technical assistance regarding floodway and floodplain with
IDNR-OWR and FEMA regulations.
I ..... L) K E S F -III E R R Y, F) E , C p::: III , C F) E S C
Page 2 of 2
il
("hristol::)her If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
JEII' IIS IIS IIS O IIII , P S , CWS, CPESC
Vice President, Head, Environmental Resources Department
Mr. Anderson has extensive Environmental Resources experience managing more than 7,000
YEARS IIE:XIE' IEIRIIIFEINC IE::r. 28
environmental projects and obtaining more than 2,000 USACE Section 404 permits. He has over
YEARS WI"'IIFIHIlII tC8181F4L28
28 years of practice in assisting in review of design, permitting and monitoring projects and
Restoration Area,
their impact on wetland and natural areas. Responsibilities include the day-to-day coordination
Eil tCIUt;A"Il IICIR
Bachelor of Arts, 1985
of 17 environmental professionals, coordination and completion of wetland and natural
Geology
area assessments, delineations, design, permitting, maintenance and monitoring, as well as
Augustana College
resolution of USACE/USEPA enforcement actions. In addition, performs mitigation design and
McHenry County
development and technical tasks associated with civil and water resources engineering and
C IE:::IR 1`111PIC:A'1EIIC INS
geological analysis in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin. Also responsible for coordination with
Professional Wetland Scientist
clients on implementation of and compliance with NPDES Regulations.
Society of Wetland Scientists
Jedd is a veteran in the design and installation of sediment and erosion control. Completes
Certified Professional in
hydro -geomorphologic studies to assist in stream restoration and remeandering. Well versed
Erosion and Sediment Control
in soil bioengineering techniques for streambank stabilization and provides environmental,
Restoration Area,
wetland, sediment, and erosion control. Has expertise in NEPA, Endangered Species Act, and
Certified Wetland Specialist,
Lake County
biological assessments for threatened and endangered species. Clients include governmental
Management, ASCE 2011
agencies, municipalities, forest preserve districts, park districts & school districts, as well as
Certified Wetland Specialist,
private enterprises. Responsible for review of projects for compliance with Villages of Kildeer
McHenry County
and Riverwoods Ordinances. Also, currently provides wetland consultation services for Addison,
Bank, Land and Water
Algonquin, Bensenville, Bloomingdale, Carol Stream, Crystal Lake, Downers Grove, Hawthorn
Designated Erosion Control
Woods, Huntley, Lake Barrington, Long Grove, Woodridge, Wood Dale, and DuPage County.
Inspector (DECI), Lake County
O'Hare International Airport Modernization Program: Lead Wetland Consultant for Qualified Wetland Review
preparation and submittal of Section 404 Permit Application encompassing more than 154 Specialist, Kane County
acres of wetland impact within the 8,000 O'Hare International Airport, as well prepared the
DuPage County Wetland Submittal. Coordinated more than 440 acres of wetland mitigation for f' EtIE Il..l Mitigation 111t
Pine Dunes Wetland Mitig
the replacement of the lost wetland areas. Lead consultant on the design of wetland mitigation on
Area, Land and Water
required for wetland impacts occurring in the DuPage County portion of the airport. Magazine, May/June 2016
Pine Dunes Wetland Mitigation Area, Illinois Tollway, Lake County: Project Manager
The Unique Components of
responsible for coordination of project design and permitting as well as Principal Designer of
the West Branch Wetland
the restoration program which included: design of all on-site grading; location of amenities,
Restoration Area,
including bike paths, bridges and boardwalks; field tile abandonment; restoration and planting
DuPage County, Watershed
plans; and stream restoration plans which included design of pool riffle structures. Responsible
Management, ASCE 2011
for completion of wetland delineation, floristic inventory, and threatened and endangered
species survey. Coordinated completion of soil survey, field the survey, topographic survey,
St. Charles Wetland Mitigation
hydrology and hydraulic study, and all CAD work. Assisted with preparation of construction,
Bank, Land and Water
long-term management and monitoring cost estimates. Pine Dunes includes approx. 220 acres
Magazine, Jan/Feb 1995
of upland within the 315 acre parcel that are currently under agricultural production or are
AWARDS
woodlands comprised of white oak, red oak and other hardwoods. Project involves wetland
2016 Engineering Excellence
creation, wetland enhancement, stream restoration, forest enhancement and restoration, and
Awards-ACEC Illinois, Honor
restoration of upland areas to prairie/savanna. The mitigation potential includes 32 acres of
Award Winner, Pine Dunes
wetland enhancement, 58 acres of wetland restoration, and 20 acres of upland enhancement
Wetland Mitigation Area
credit, 100 acres of woodland enhancement, 3,300' of stream restoration, for a total of about
85 acres of wetland/waters mitigation credit. In addition to wetland mitigation design and
Certificate of Appreciation,
permitting services, CBBEL designed a 24 car parking lot, restroom, well, water fountain and
St. Charles Wetland
nearly 3 miles of bike path, along with a 300' long bridge and 3 boardwalks.
Mitigation Bank, June 1994
Illiana Corridor, 1-55 to 1-65, IDOT & INDOT: Lead for preparation of Groundwater Resources Hendren Geology Scholarship,
Section and assisted with Water Resources Section of Tier 1 and Tier 2 EIS, environmental Augustana College
fieldwork, data collection, and impact assessment (as subconsultant) for approx. 950 square
mile study area located in portions of Will and Kankakee Counties (IL) and Lake County (IN).
Specific responsibilities included technical writing for Tier 1 and Tier 2 EIS; preparation of
scope, budget, methodology, data collection, environmental fieldwork/coordination (for Indiana
water resources: streams, lakes/ponds, habitat assessments, fish, mussels, and aquatic macro -
invertebrates), agency coordination, and QA/QC. Tier 1 EIS Record of Decision was granted by
FHWA in 2013 and Tier 2 EIS Record of Decision was granted in 2014. Jedd is lead consultant on
wetland/water permitting.
Illinois Tollway: Principal Reviewer, Projects include soil erosion and sediment control
inspections, wetland assessments, delineations and floristic inventories for roadway
improvements, drainage improvements and proposed interchanges. Sample project 11B
Christopher I3. IL,mrlke Il ingiineeirinrng, ILtd. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 F: 847.823.0520 cbbel.com
JEIII' IID IIS IIS O IIID , RWS, CWS, CPESC
Page 2 of 3
sites include 1-57 and 1-294 interchange, 1-88 at Eola Road
interchange, 1-88 at Farnsworth Road, and 1-90 widening and
drainage improvements.
Seneca 1-80 Riverport: Project Manager responsible for
the completion of wetland delineation, and USACE and IEPA
permitting. IEPA permit required an Individual Permit requiring
completion of an anti -degradation submittal and coordination.
Proposed project consists of installation of a new barge and
grain handling facility for the export of agricultural products on
the Illinois River.
DuPage County Stormwater Ordinance: Worked on complete
overhaul of the County Stormwater Ordinance to reflect the
current and future development conditions. The revised
ordinance was developed with input from Steering Committee
made up of municipal engineers and County staff. Specifically
responsible for preparation of Wetland/Waters, Buffer, BMP and
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Sections of new ordinance.
Watershed Management Ordinance Implementation,
MWRDGC: CBBEL is the prime consultant for engineering
services in support of the MWRD's new Watershed Management
Ordinance Implementation. CBBEL developed a TGM to be
used as a technical reference for the stormwater management
regulations contained in the WMO and worked with the City
of Chicago, the Metropolitan Planning Council, and other
stakeholders to develop guidance for the design of green
infrastructure. Jedd was the lead environmental consultant for
preparation of the relevant sections of the manual and training
classes.
Covenant Village of Northbrook Streambank Stabilization:
Principal Project Manager responsible for completion of wetland/
waters delineation, design of all bank stabilization treatments,
and coordination of all CAD drafting. Obtained Village, USACE,
IEPA and Soil and Water Conservation District approvals. CBBEL
assisted with design, permitting, bid assistance, and construction
observation. Purpose of the project was to replace an existing
timber retaining wall and restore near vertical eroded banks along
900' of Techny Drain, which passes through the front of property.
CBBEL was tasked with providing alternative designs, presenting
the aesthetics and benefits of each alternative and evaluating the
cost to install each on a LF basis, since nearly 1,800 LF of work
would be required. The project was broken into 3 units based
on the location of entrance roads. The esthetic importance of
each unit was evaluated and assigned esthetic priority levels.
Higher priority units would receive higher quality aesthetic bank
treatments. Project involved design of limestone block walls,
gabion walls and boulder toe treatments.
95th Street Extension, Bolingbrook/Naperville: Lead
Environmental Consultant responsible for completion of
wetland and waters delineation as well as the preparation and
submittal of wetland/waters impact individual permits to USACE
and IEPA. Required extensive coordination with the Village
of Bolingbrook, City of Naperville, Naperville Park District,
FPDWC, Conservation Foundation and WCDOT. The USACE
and IEPA permits were processed as Individual Permits requiring
alternative sites analysis and anti -degradation reviews. Project
included the extension of 95th St between the intersection
of 95th St and Plainfield- Naperville Rd and the intersection of
Boughton Rd and Kings Rd with a new bridge over the DuPage
River to reduce the driving distance between intersections from
2.6 miles to 1.5 miles, a reduction of 1.1 miles.
Seneca 1-80 Railport: Environmental Project Manager
responsible for successful project permitting; wetland
delineation, and preparation of all Individual Permit Application
documents for Rock Island District USACE, IEPA, and other
stakeholder agencies. Designed all wetland detention basins,
wetland and forest mitigation areas, upland reforestation plans
and stream restoration and mitigation plans; prepared the long
term management and monitoring plans for all mitigation and
restoration areas. Prepared a Biologic Assessment for Indiana
Bat, a Federally listed species, in accordance with Federal
Methodology.
The Seneca 1-80 Rallport is located within a property covering
approx. 1,900 acres. The proposed ±454 acre Intermodal facility
impacts 39.21 acres of wetlands and waters of the U.S. In return
for these unavoidable impacts, 184 acres of new wetlands, waters
and prairie will be created in conjunction with 766 acres of total
preserved open space. A total of 102.8 acres of wetland mitigation
credit will be generated. In return a total of 91.63 acres of wetland
will be created in an area currently comprised of agricultural
upland fields in conjunction with 12.9 acres of existing wetland
enhancement and 79.7 acres of prairie and woods establishment.
Additionally, all Stormwater management areas will be established
as wetland facilities with native vegetation and all stormwater
will pass through the stormwater management facilities prior to
discharge into the wetland mitigation areas.
West Branch Wetland Mitigation Area, DuPage County:
Project Manager for design and permitting of 130 -acre wetland
mitigation area In conjunction with 340 -acres of upland/prairie
restoration and 5,000' of stream restoration. Responsible for
completion of wetland delineation, floristic inventory, and
installation of groundwater monitoring wells. Coordinated
completion of soil survey, field the survey, topographic survey,
hydrology and hydraulic study, and all CAD work. Principal
designer of restoration program, which included design of all
on-site grading, field tile abandonment, restoration and planting
plans, along with 5,000' of streambank restoration which
included, design of riffles and remeandering of the West Branch
DuPage River. Prepared construction, long-term management
and monitoring cost estimates.
Elgin O'Hare — West Bypass, IDOT: CBBEL Lead for
preparation of EIS, environmental fieldwork, data collection,
impact assessment, and GIS database development (as
subconsultant) for 127 square mile study area. Specific
responsibilities included preparation of scope of services,
methodology, data collection, preliminary environmental
fieldwork/coordination (wetlands, water resources, upland
habitat, and aquatics), agency coordination, and quality
assurance and quality control pertaining to environmental
resources. Primary author for several sections of the Tier One
Draft EIS and various other project documents. Participated in
public involvement meetings and tasks in accordance with IDOT
CSS policies and procedures.
11B
Christopher I3. IL,mrlke Il ingiineeirinrng, Ltd 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
JEIII' IID IIS IIS O IIID , RWS, CWS, CPESC
Page 3 of 3
Northside Park Restoration, Wheaton: Project Manager and
Lead Environmental Design and Permitting, responsible for
project coordination and management, design, construction
cost estimates, and permitting, including response to comments
and meeting attendance and coordination. Designed grading
plans, SWPPP, erosion and sediment control plans, paths,
planting and seeding plans, wetland and riparian enhancement
plans, and long term management and monitoring plan. Project
had a number of components including shoreline restoration,
lagoon hydraulic and conventional dredging, and sediment
dewatering and disposal- Lagoon access improvements
included 5 new bridges, 10 fishing docks and new walking paths.
Park improvements also included building reconstruction and
maintenance building demolition, Thompson and Wheaton
Oaks properties stormwater improvements, sanitary sewer
forcemain, and storm sewer outfall relocation. Activities required
permitting through the City of Wheaton, DuPage County, Kane-
DuPage Soil and Water Conservation District, IDNR-T&E Species
Consultation, IEPA, USFWS and USACE.
Stoneroller Greek, Lake County: Project Manager and Lead
Stream Restoration Designer, responsible for preparation of
stream restoration design, project management and coordination.
Project involved the design of streambank stabilization for
approx. 1,000' of Stoneroller Creek's severely eroded banks in
Lake Carina Forest Preserve near Gurnee. Several techniques
were developed to stabilize and repair the bank including rock
vanes and riffles, stepped pools, boulder toe, selective clearing,
regrading, and shoreline and bank revegetation. CBBEL provided
topographic and tree survey; design of stabilization techniques;
construction documents including plans, specifications and cost
estimates; part-time construction observation and NPDES/DECI
compliance monitoring; as well as permitting through LCSMC,
IDOT, and USACE.
PIROIF IFSS II OIIN' All.... II:::D IEIF II...OIIPM IF IN"'F
"Lessons Learned In Stream Construction and Bank
Stabilization", Illinois Association of Park Districts Conference,
Chicago 2017
Seminars Taught: "Local TMDLs & Regional TMDLs:
Engagement or Shotgun Wedding", Center for Watershed
Protection Watershed & Stormwater Management Webcast
Series 2014
"Unique Components of the West Branch Wetland Restoration
Area, DuPage" Attendee and Presenter, ASCE-2010 Watershed
Management Conference, Madison, WI
"In Stream Construction and Bank Protection": Attendee and
Presenter, 2010 Ground Control Conference, Bloomington
SAME Post Meeting, Rock Island
"Main Street/Northside Park Flood Control Project", Attendee
and Presenter, 2010 IAFSM Conference, Tinley Park
Fallow -up to Natural Areas in Your Community, Del Webb -
Edgewater Homeowners Association 2008
"Best Management Practices for the Next 5 Years", APWA-
Chicago Chapter Conference 2007
"Update on the Procedures for Determining Jurisdictional
Wetlands and Waters of the United States", IAEP 2007
Natural Areas in Your Community, Del Webb -Edgewater
Homeowners Association 2007
National Pollutant Discharge Eliminations System/Wetland
Regulation Seminars (4 courses taught) 2005
Seminars Attended: Stream Functions Pyramid Workshop,
Stream Mechanics, Parma, OH 2014
Physical and Biological Goals of the Clean Water Act: What
Stormwater Professionals Need to Know, The Conservation
Foundation and DuPage County Stormwater Management
Division, Naperville 2012
Illinois Stream Mitigation Conference, Rosemont 2011
Beyond the Basics, The Evolution of Stormwater Best
Management Practices, The Conservation Foundation, Lisle 2011
Vegetative Establishment, Ero-tex, Libertyville 2011
Ethics in City Government, Ethics Training for CDA/OMP
Contractors, Vendors and Employees
Natural Areas Management Seminar, DuPage County, Wheaton
2010
Beyond the Basics: Green Infrastructure for Clean Water, The
Conservation Foundation, Woodridge 2010
Illinois Soil Classifiers Association, "Using the Midwest Regional
Supplement for Wetland Delineation, Geneva 2009
PROIFIFSSIIOINAIL, AFIFIIII....IIXi" TIONS
Association of State Wetland Managers
Chicago Wilderness Corporate Council, Vice Chairman, 2006-
2010
Illinois Association for Floodplain and Stormwater Management,
Wetland Committee Chair, 1995-2006
Society of American Military Engineers
Society of Wetland Scientists
III
Christopher I3. IL,mrlte Il ingiineeirinrng, Ltd 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
Project Manager
Project Manager experienced in civil engineering. Responsible for the development of various
YIf AIRS IEXPlfi'rlR111ElNCw.lf: 21
highway, streetscape, wetland and bikeway projects. Duties include preparation of construction
YlfiAIRS WII CII II tw.lw:blw:blw::ll.... 13
plans, specifications and permits, site planning, agency coordination, and construction cost
estimates. Experienced in Phase I design, Phase II design and Construction Oversight.
L.::II:3ceC llt�l1996
Bachelor of Science, 6
Software experience includes: MicroStation, Geopak, AutoTurn, Microsoft Word/Excel/Project.
Civil Engineering
University of Illinois at
IIVfIWNICIIPAII....IIIIIFS
Urbana -Champaign
Terrace View Pond (Phase II), Lombard: Project Manager responsible for supervising the
I1:1IIP0If lf::SSII0IN A 1... IIPIf::(IaIIS.C.IIPAC 110 IN
preparation of design plans, specifications, cost estimates, permits, land acquisition, and
Professional Engineer, IL,
other contract documents. Improvements included installation of a lift station at pond's outlet,
062.054957, 2001
8' diameter intake structures with check valves, storm sewer backfilled with lightweight fill,
temporary coffer dams, grass -pavement drive for maintenance access to lift station controls,
tw.II::IR CII IP11("AC 1101INS
shoreline wetland restoration, dual relief sewers (under new shared use path) to allow the
Certified Professional in
roadway storm sewer system to drain into Terrace View Pond, trail restoration, and landscape
Erosion and Sediment Control
restoration. The lift station allowed the normal water elevation to be lowered by one foot,
If"IR 0 If IE as as II 0 IN II... II:) If:: V lf:: IIIfs Ian If:;.IN"C"
resulting in an additional 13 acre-feet of stormwater storage. Project challenges included very
...0
Seminars Presented:
poor soil conditions and tight access. Coordination included permitting from DuPage County,
survey and plat preparation, utility coordination, and Key Stakeholder coordination.
Trees as Infrastructure
(Morton Arboretum/IDOT)
Vista Pond (Phase II), Lombard: Project Manager responsible for supervising the preparation
of design plans, specifications, cost estimates, permits, and other contract documents.
ADA in the Public ROW
Improvements included staged excavation (to work in the dry), boulder -toe slopes, inlet pipe
(CBBEL)
reconstruction, articulated concrete revetment mat, native seeding of shoreline, trail restoration,
and landscape restoration. The 19,400 cubic yards of excavation resulted in an additional 6.5
PRS') lw. SS11110INAll... A IP 1111 11 5A.0 f011'4"
acre-feet of stormwater storage. Coordination included USACE letter of no objection, utility
American Society of
coordination, and Key Stakeholder coordination.
Civil Engineers IL Section:
Communications Chair (Past),
Main Street Bike Lanes (Phase II), Skokie: Project Manager responsible for design plans,
Board Director (Past),
Group Chair
Transportation(Past)
specifications, cost estimates, permits, documents and other contract documents for the
construction of 2.5 miles of 5' wide one-way bike lanes on Main St between Lincoln Ave and
McCormick Blvd. Other improvements included milling & resurfacing of segments of the
American Council of
roadway, signage and bike rack installation. Coordination of this federally funded project
Engineering Companies
included CCHD and IDOT. Bike lanes included green pavement markings within conflict zones.
IL Section — Environmental
Committee (2014 -Present)
Old Orchard Road Shared Use Path, Skokie: Project Manager responsible for supervising the
preparation of design plans, specifications, cost estimates, permits, land acquisition documents
Pullman National Park
and other contract documents for the construction of 0.8 miles of 10' wide shared use path in
Technical Committee Member
the south parkway of Old Orchard Rd from Skokie Blvd to Gross Point Rd. Other improvements
Positioning Pullman (2015)
included bus stop/bike rack sidewalk, signage, segmental block retaining walls, fencing,
bike racks, and landscape restoration. Permits were obtained from CCHD with additional
coordination of this federally funded project with IDOT and utilities.
Addison Creek Stream Restoration (Phase II), Northlake: Project Engineer responsible for
supervising the preparation of design plans, specifications, cost estimates, permits and other
contract documents for the re -meandering and widening of over 3250' of the creek resulting
in much lower flood elevations and improved stormwater quality. The stabilization included
bioengineering techniques such as gabions, boulder -toe slopes, riffles/pools, pilot channel
gravel bed, and regrading/revegetation. Other improvements included removal of two dams,
shared use path restoration, exercise trail/equipment installation, trees/shrubs, temporary
coffer dams, temporary bypass pumping, and signage. The 25,000 CY of channel bank/islands
excavated spoil was used in the adjacent open space to create space for 3 soccer fields,
completing the 26 acre improvement. Coordination included MWRD, USACE, Soil Conservation
District, utilities, and other stakeholders.
Salt Creek Streambank Stabilization, Section IV (Phase 11), Rolling Meadows: Project
Manager responsible for supervising the preparation of design plans, specifications, cost
estimates, permits and other contract documents for the stabilization of over 3000'. The
stabilization included bioengineering techniques such as stabilization with boulder -toe slopes
and regrading/revegetation. Provided documentation and public education to meet the
requirements of the IEPA funding grant. �V
I1111111MI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�
Christol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
Madison Avenue Streetscape (Phase I, 11), Oak Park: Project
Manager. Phase I included providing conceptual level plans,
traffic analysis and cost estimates for 3 ultimate options to
remake Madison St into a vibrant, safer, complete street. The
1.5 mile corridor from Harlem Ave to Ashland Ave spans the
entire Village and is one of the major east -west corridors . The
leading design consisted of a road diet of the corridor, slightly
widening the parkways, adding a new bike lane in each direction
in the western third of the corridor, and adding protected bike
lanes. With shifting in the curbline and removing the barrier
medians, the roadway is reduced from the existing 4 -lane
section with parking on both sides to a 3 -lane section with bike
lanes and parking on both sides. Phase 11 included design plans,
specifications, cost estimates, and other contract documents for
4 blocks of the staged improvement and buffered bike lanes for
the remainder of the Harlem Ave to Austin Ave corridor.
US Route 14 (Miner St) Streetscape, Graceland to Pearson
(Phase I, II), Des Plaines: Project Manager responsible for
supervising the preparation of design plans, specifications,
cost estimates, and other contract documents for streetscape
improvement to Miner St and the adjacent side streets.
Improvements included new sidewalk, clay paver and granite
sidewalk, ADA ramps and crosswalks, trees in grates, trees
in raised planters and other landscape items with electrical
receptacles and irrigation, driveway reconstruction, pavement
patching, milling & resurfacing of the roadways, and a Gateway
Element Structure. Other improvements included new parking
lot and bus drop off area, median with planter, new clay
paver and granite sidewalk plaza at City Hall and traffic signal
maintenance. Work was done via IDOT permit, coordination
with Metra for work on their property and pedestrian crossing
improvements, utility companies and Key Stakeholders.
Ellinwood Street Streetscape and Lee Street Water Main,
Graceland to Pearson (Phase I, 11), Des Plaines: Project Manager
responsible for supervising the preparation of design plans,
specifications, cost estimates, and other contract documents
for streetscape improvement to Ellinwood St and the adjacent
side streets. Improvements included new sidewalk, clay paver
and granite sidewalk, ADA ramps and crosswalks, trees in grates,
trees in raised planters and other landscape items with electrical
receptacles and irrigation, driveway reconstruction, pavement
patching, milling & resurfacing of the roadways, a Gateway
Element Structure and traffic signal loop replacement and
maintenance. Other improvements included new 12" water main
under the dual Metra/UP railroad tracks connecting to existing
main. Work was done via IDOT and UP permits, coordination
with Metra for work on their property and pedestrian crossing
improvements, utility companies and Key Stakeholders.
Lee Street Streetscape, Thacker to Ellinwood (Phase I, 11),
Des Plaines: Project Manager responsible for supervising the
preparation of design plans, specifications, cost estimates,
and other contract documents for road diet and streetscape
improvement to Lee St (US 12/45) and the adjacent side streets
to accommodate wider sidewalks and a bike lane. Improvements
included new sidewalk, clay paver and granite sidewalk, ADA
ramps and crosswalks, trees in grates, trees in raised planters
and other landscape items with electrical receptacles and
irrigation, driveway reconstruction, pavement patching, milling
Page 2 of 4
& resurfacing of the roadways, decorative roadway/pedestrian
lighting, a Gateway Element Structure and traffic signal loop
replacement and maintenance. Work was done via IDOT permit,
coordination with utility companies and Key Stakeholders.
IL Route 58 (Golf Rd) and New Wilke Rd Intersection
Improvement (Phase 11), Rolling Meadows: Project Manager
responsible for supervising the preparation of roadway design
plans, specifications, cost estimates, and other contract
documents for the reconstruction of the intersection, totaling
over 4.3 lane miles of new concrete pavement providing dual
left turn lanes and other designated turn lanes. Two new
signals provided, new storm sewer system, sidewalk, bike
path, entrances, medians, short retaining walls, landscaping
and lighting system relocation. Extensive coordination of this
federally funded project included the 13 affected utility owners,
adjacent property owners, and other Key Stakeholders.
Hawthorne Lane Reconstruction (Phase I, II & III), West
Chicago: Project Manager responsible for roadway design
plans, specifications, cost estimates, permits and other contract
documents for the reconstruction of 2 miles of Hawthorne
Lane from Powis Rd to Arbor Ave. The project provided for the
existing 2 -lane facility to be expanded to a 3 -lane section bound
by curb and gutter, with a shared use path in the south parkway.
Other improvements included a closed drainage system,
sidewalks, sanitary sewer, water main and design of 3 detention
basins. Improvement to 3 railroad crossings (meeting quiet zone
requirements), and channelization at intersections were made.
Coordination of this federally funded project included IDOT,
UPRR, EJ&E railroad, ICC, USACE, DuPage County Stormwater
Management Commission, and DCDOT was part of Phase II of
this STP funded project.
Wolf Rd/153rd St Bike Path (Phase 11), Orland Park: Project
Manager responsible for design plans, specifications, cost
estimates, permits, land acquisition documents and other
contract documents for the construction of 0.7 miles of bike path
on 153rd St from Wolf Rd (IL Rte 7) to 108th Ave and on Wolf
Rd from 153rd St north for 900'. Other improvements included
traffic signal improvements, segments of closed drainage
system, sidewalk, segmental block retaining walls, railings, and
landscape restoration. Permits were obtained from CCHD and
IDOT. as well as additional coordination with utilities.
River Edge Park Master Adaptive Plan (Phase 1), Aurora:
Project Manager responsible for coordinating Permitting
Group, Architectural Group, Landscape Group, and Civil Group
in producing USACE/IDNR Permit Plan Set and Master Plan
documents for the 30 acre park that encompasses the Fox
River. Amongst the lawns and promenades of the park there
will be a visitor center, market place, outdoor music venue,
environmental education center, native botanic gardens; all tied
together by a pedestrian bridge crossing the Fox River. The Park
Collaborative, a group of architects, engineers and design firms
lead by CBBEL, successfully developed the multi -phase master
plan by coordinating extensively with the City and the many
committees and organizations.
il
";;hristol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
CIHIICAGO IDEIPAIR°"i"IMIEIN"i" OF "i"IRAINSIPOIR"i"A''i"IIOIN
Michigan Avenue Streetscape, 23rd and 24th St, (Phase
II), East Side, Chicago: Project Manager responsible for
supervising the preparation of concept plans, design plans,
specifications, cost estimates, and other contract documents
for roadway and streetscape improvements to 2 blocks of 23rd
St and 2 blocks of 24th St from State St to Michigan Ave and
adding "flex space" in the parking lanes on Michigan Ave from
Cermak Ave to 24th Place. Flex space included movable barriers
that convert sections of the parking lane into pedestrian spaces.
Improvements included storm sewer, replacement of curb and
gutter, utility adjustments, street milling/resurfacing, crosswalks,
concrete bus pads, sidewalk and driveway replacement meeting
the City's strict ADA criteria, paver parkways, paver parking
lanes, street lighting, new trees, planters and sod, community
identifiers on light poles, and vertical gateway elements. Green
initiatives included lighting, trees, & recycling/re-use of material.
Devon Avenue Streetscape, Kedzie Ave to Leavitt St (Phase
II), Northwest Side, Chicago: Project Manager responsible
for supervising the preparation of concept plans, design plans,
specifications, cost estimates, and other contract documents for
roadway and streetscape improvements to 11/4 miles of Devon
Ave and the first half -block of the 21 side streets. Improvements
included traffic calming by skinning the parking lane by
replacing curb and gutter 3' closer to centerline and adding
bump -outs to all corners. Improvements also included storm
sewer, utility adjustments, street milling/resurfacing, stamped
intersections, crosswalks, concrete bus pads, sidewalk and
driveway replacement meeting the City's strict ADA criteria, paver
parkways, street lighting, new trees, planters and sod, community
identifiers on light poles, and vertical gateway elements. Green
initiatives included lighting, trees, & recycling/re-use of material.
This project was bid as four separate construction projects.
95th Street Streetscape, Western Ave to Ashland Ave (Phase
II), Southwest Side, Chicago: Project Manager responsible
for supervising the preparation of concept plans, design plans,
specifications, cost estimates, and other contract documents
for roadway and streetscape improvements to 11/4 miles of 95th
St and the first half -block of the 22 side streets. Improvements
included replacement of curb and gutter, storm sewer, median
curb and nose improvements (creating pedestrian refuge
islands), utility adjustments, street milling/resurfacing, stamped
colored crosswalks, concrete bus pads, sidewalk and driveway
replacement meeting the City's strict ADA criteria, paver
parkways, street lighting, and new trees, planters and sod
and community identifiers on light poles and vertical gateway
elements. Green initiatives included lighting, trees, recycling/
re -use of materials, designing project around recently improved
spot segments of corridor. This project was bid as three
separate construction projects.
Lawrence Avenue Streetscape, Chicago River to Clark
St (Phase II), Northeast Side, Chicago: Project Manager
responsible for supervising the preparation of concept plans,
design plans, specifications, cost estimates, and other contract
documents for roadway and streetscape improvements to 2
miles of Lawrence Ave and the first half -block of the 30 side
streets. To better accommodate the multi -modal nature, the
project provided a designated bike lane and narrowed the
Page 3 of 4
roadway (from 4 lanes to 3 lanes) to provide additional pedestrian
area. Improvements included replacement of curb and gutter,
storm sewer, traffic signal modifications, median curb and
nose improvements (creating pedestrian refuge islands), utility
adjustments, street milling/resurfacing, concrete bus pads,
stamped colored crosswalks, sidewalk and driveway replacement
meeting the City's strict ADA criteria, street lighting, and new
trees, planters and sod and community identifiers on light
poles. Green initiatives included lighting, bioswales, trees,
permeable pavers, recycling/re-use of materials, and under -
parkway stormwater storage/infiltration system. This project was
developed as two separate construction projects.
IKANIE COUNTY IDIVIISIIOII' OF "li"IRAIf'�JSIPOIR"i"A''i"IIOIN
Big Timber Road (Phase II), Unincorporated Kane County:
Project Manager responsible for roadway/site design plans,
specifications, cost estimates, and other contract documents
for the reconstruction of 0.3 miles of Big Timber Rd and
relocation of Tyler Creek. The widening required Tyler Creek to
be relocated for approximately 1,000' and its confluence with
Pingree Creek to be moved. The existing bridges over Tyler
Creek and Pingree Creek were removed and a single structure
constructed past the new confluence. Coordination with IDOT,
USACE, Kane-DuPage Soil Conservation District, utilities,
adjacent Villages and other stakeholders was part of this the
federally funded project. Project received an ASCE-Illinois
Section Outstanding Civil Engineering Achievement Award.
LAII IE C01YNTY DIIVIISIIOI1N OF "i"IiRAINSIPOIiR"i"A''i"IIOIN
Deerfield Road Bike Path (Phase II), Riverwoods: Project
Manager responsible for supervising the preparation of design
plans, specifications, cost estimates, and other contract
documents. Project included a new off-street bike path along
the south side of Deerfield Rd from Thornmeadow Rd to the
existing Des Plaines River Trail, a distance of 0.25 miles. The path
has a 3 -span prefabricated bridge over the Des Plaines River
connecting to wooden boardwalks above the floodway, meeting
into at -grade bituminous paths at the project limits. Coordination
with IDOT, LCFPD, LCSMC, USACE, utilities, and Village of
Riverwoods was part of this federally funded project. CBBEL also
submitted and received permits and prepared Plat of Highways.
Delany Road (Phase II), Waukegan: Project Manager
responsible for roadway design plans, specifications, cost
estimates, and other contract documents for the reconstruction
of 2 miles of Delany Rd from Sunset Ave to Wadsworth Rd. The
existing facility will be expanded to a 5 -lane section bound
by curb and gutter with a closed drainage system, sidewalk
based on geometric studies, identification of ROW and permit
requirements. Other improvements will include signals/
channelization at intersections, stormwater detention facilities,
and soil remediation at floodway culvert. Coordinating included
LCSMC, USACE, utilities, Village of Wadsworth, and City of
Waukegan.
il
("hristol::)her If:',.. Burke Engineering, Ii L'1. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
Butterfield Road (North) (Phase I, 11), Libertyville: Project
Engineer responsible for roadway design plans, specifications,
cost estimates, and other contract documents for the
reconstruction of 2 miles of Butterfield Rd from Harding Ave
to IL Route 137. The existing facility was expanded to a 5 -lane
section bound by curb and gutter with a closed drainage system,
landscaped median planter, retaining walls, sidewalk, watermain
and sanitary sewer. Improvement to the crossing of the Metra
railroad (meeting quiet zone requirements), signals/channelization
at intersections and stormwater detention were made.
Coordination with IDOT, LCSMC, utilities, Village of Libertyville,
and Metra was part of Phase II of this STP funded project. Phase
I work included an ECAD Report, coordination with affiliated
agencies and utilities, geometric studies, identification of ROW
and permit requirements, and preliminary cost estimates.
I II....II....I 1P40 16 "T"01 I WAY
Pine Dunes Forest Preserve Wetland Mitigation Area, Lake
County: Project Engineer responsible for preparing site -civil
plans, specifications, cost estimates, as well as utility coordination
and highway access permits from LCDOT, IDOT and Newport
Township Hwy Dept. The project involves wetland creation
and enhancement, stream restoration, forest enhancement
and restoration, and restoration of upland areas to prairie/
savanna. The mitigation potential includes 32 acres of wetland
enhancement, 58 acres of wetland restoration, and 20 acres of
upland enhancement credit, 100 acres of woodland enhancement,
3,300 feet of stream restoration, for a total of about 85 acres
of wetland/waters mitigation credit. In addition to wetland
mitigation design and permitting services, CBBEL designed a 24
car parking lot, restroom, well, water fountain and nearly 3 miles
of bike path, along with a 300' long bridge and 3 boardwalks. This
project was a collaboration between LCFPD and the Tollway as
part of Elgin O'Hare Western Access improvements.
I....AIKIE CCPV PTT"Y IFORES"T" PRESERVES
Hastings Lake Public Access Improvement (Phase 11), Lake
Villa: Project Manager responsible for supervising the preparation
of design plans, specifications, cost estimates, and other contract
documents for improvements to the 250 acre site which included
providing 2.5 miles of asphalt path, 1.5 miles of crushed stone
trail, grading, five prefabricated boardwalk structures, five parking
lots totaling 140 stalls approximately 3,200 feet of paved internal
roadway, boat launch and retaining walls, two floating fishing
piers with abutments, picnic shelter site work, restroom site work
and septic field, comfort station site work, and lake overlooks.
CBBEL provided land surveying, geotechnical investigations,
design, engineering, hydrologic/hydraulic analysis, permitting
and contract documents for the improvements. As part of the
access improvement at the entrance to County Hwy A-11, a traffic
study, turn bay road widening and LCDOT access permits were
engineered and received approval. Also included in the design
was 700' of bituminous trail along Grass Lake Road in LCDOT
ROW, requiring storm sewer with restrictor outlet, new curb/
gutter & landscape restoration per LCDOT standards.
FORTE"S"i" IPIRIE"SIEIRVIE ID IIS"i1RIC"i" OF W1111 11 COU11141"Y
Black Road Trail, DuPage River Trail to Rock Run Greenway
Trail (Feasibility Study, Phase 1), Shorewood/Joliet:
Project Manager responsible for supervising the preparation
of feasibility report, funding applications, design plans,
Page 4 of 4
specifications, cost estimates, permits, and other contract
documents for the construction of 0.5 miles of shared use path.
Study looked at constructability, permit implications, aesthetics,
phasing, construction costs, and coordination needs with
adjacent bridge project and trail project. Design includes 10'
wide shared use trail, 290' three -span prefabricated pedestrian
bridge on new piers/abutments over DuPage River, 233' two -
span prefabricated pedestrian bridge on new pier/abutments
over 1-55, traffic signal improvements, sidewalk, segmental block
retaining walls, railings, guardrail terminal improvements, native
seeding/wetland restoration, compensatory storage basin, and
landscape restoration. Work on 155 included median barrier wall
replacement, frontage work, and temporary barrier wall for lane
shifts and full closure for setting bridge. Coordination of this
federally funded project included IDOT, Village of Shorewood,
City of Joliet, adjacent property owners, USACE, Will County
Stormwater Management, and utilities.
il
("hristol::)her If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
II C1 11AIVIORE1„,,, , F) E
Project Engineer
/%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%/////%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%//%/////////////////OA//////////.�"//iO."//.�"//.�”�������19/��'0/-1Y'�9/�/-1Y'/.;r%^/-1Y'/-1Y"/-1Y"�Yb�(P(P(P(P(P(P(P(%'f fY'.�d0.�d0.��d.��d.��&Q6'r6�'M"/(//,��;Y�;Y�;Y�;Y�'ft�;f�Nllflllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Professional Engineer experienced in civil engineering. Responsible for development of various '°f Ifi°:AIRS II:°:xlPIw:::IR111EINtw.lw: 13
design projects, including residential, commercial, industrial, road design, and site development '°f Ifi::AIRS WII CII II tw.lw:blw:blw::11. 13
projects. Duties include grading design, utility layout design, roadway design, earthwork
analysis, cost estimation, stormwater management design, permitting, and construction w.:::11:3�ellt�l3
observation. Additional responsibilities include preparing project reports, design plans, Bachelor of Science,
Civil Engineering
planning studies, specifications, and project coordination with other professionals. Purdue University
RIESIIIDIEIPTT'IIAII..• PIR 0If 1f:°:SSII0INAII... IR If.: C3IIS.C.IRAT II0II'4
Bristol Park, Wood Dale: Provided engineering services related to development of 121 Professional Engineer, IL,
townhome units. The site is contained on 14.7 acres requiring detailed grading and retaining walls. 062.060393, 2008
Development included design of detention basin & stepped foundations for townhome buildings.
Caledonia Subdivision, Yorkville: Design Engineer responsible for preparation of engineering
design plans and surveying services for large residential subdivision. The site is made up of 206
single-family homes on a 100 acre site. Buildable lots were achieved by providing compensatory
storage for floodplain fill to be placed to elevate the property above the base flood elevation.
Assisted with coordination with Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District to provide route along and
adjacent to property for Rob Roy Creek Interceptor Sanitary Sewer.
Fieldgate Subdivision, Beecher: Design Engineer responsible for preparation of final
engineering design, construction plans, and specifications for grading, paving, utility service, and
drainage aspects of a residential subdivision consisting of 243 single family lots and 140 townhome
units on 133 acres. Development included design of 2 detention basins and wetland mitigation.
Lyonhart Manor, Lombard: Provided engineering services related to development of 5 single
family lots and 30 townhome units. The site is contained on 5.5 acres requiring detailed grading
to accommodate look -out and walk -out basement units and detention pond encompassed by
retaining walls.
Buckingham Point, Des Plaines: Design Engineer responsible for providing engineering
services related to development of 44 townhome units on approx. 3.44 acres of land. Scope
included final engineering design, construction plans and specifications for grading, paving,
utility service, drainage aspects, and submitting for and obtaining MWRD and IDOT permits for
the proposed development.
Grants Grove, Lindenhurst: Residential community located on 78 acres along Gelden Road.
Design plans called for preservation of 20 acres of existing wetlands and pond areas, grading
of the site that would allow for preservation of existing Red, White, and Burr Oak Tree Groves,
and created trails and park areas to provide for public appreciation of preserved wetland
and woodland areas. Permitting was also granted with LCDOT to allow for Gelden Road
improvements including left and right turn lanes and two full access locations to the subdivision.
COMMIEIRCIIAII....
Lincolnway Creekside Crossing, New Lenox: A 9 acre Mixed -Use, Retail and Office
Development located at US Route 30 and Anderson Road. Involvement included final
engineering design and IDOT permitting for ingress/egress to US Route 30. A unique element
was the use of an underground detention facility for stormwater management.
Tinley Park Retail: Design Engineer responsible for final engineering of 2 big -box retail stores,
2 in-line retail stores, and a retail drive with associated parking stalls, external depressed truck
loading docks, pavement, and utility improvements. Retail development was part of Brookside
Marketplace development. A unique element was to design to guidelines required by the big -
box retail chains while conforming to space limitations within the retail development.
Fox Lake Toyota: Provided final engineering design, construction plans and specifications for
grading, paving, utility service and drainage aspects of car dealership on about 8 acres. Plan
improvements included a one-story 38,000 SF car dealership with approx. 330 automobile
parking stalls. A unique element was the use of a pump to discharge the detention facility.
II II"�IDf•,US"i"IRVAII..
Mid -Point USA, Ameriplex, Portage, IN: A 31 acre industrial warehouse distribution facility at 1��1111111111110i Daniel Burnham Drive and Ameriplex Drive. The plan included an automobile parking lot, trailerstorage, truck loading docks, and on-site utility improvements. Project included permitting of fill a
IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIII
Christol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 ( F: 847.823.0520 ( cbbel.com
over a BP pipeline and construction of a retaining wall to avoid
the relocation of a fiber optics cable running along the property
line of the site.
Corporate Corridors of Romeoville: Design Engineer
responsible for engineering services of an industrial development
on about 80 acres located on south side of Taylor St, west of
Route 53. Services included preliminary and final engineering
design for proposed development as well as obtaining permitting
from USACE, Will/South Cook Soil and Water Conservation
District, and FAA due to the proximity to the Lewis University
airport. A unique element was phasing the development plan as
interested parties purchased lots within the development.
McLane Candy Warehouse Expansion, Danville: Provided
professional engineering services related to the expansion of an
office/manufacturing building. Project included design of new
utilities to match into existing utility structures and detention
basin and new slab and pavement elevations to match into
existing elevations.
ROADWAYS
Peterson Road at Alleghany Road, LCDOT: Project
Engineer responsible for design of roadway and stormwater
improvements. Project consisted of widening portions of
Peterson Road and Alleghany Road near their intersection. A
bike path was added along the roadways and detention ponds
were designed to handle the increased runoff.
Martingale Road Resurfacing, Schaumburg: Project Engineer
responsible for preparation of design plans and specifications
for the IDOT resurfacing project of Martingale Road between
Higgins Road and Woodfield Road. Improvements included
spot curb and gutter replacement, median improvements, street
milling/resurfacing and sidewalk and driveway replacement
meeting ADA criteria.
Loop Road, Libertyville Campus, Lake County: Provided
professional engineering services to construct a new roadway
to connect Lake County's eastern access and western access
to Winchester Road for their Libertyville Campus. Utilities were
extended for existing and future developments and stormwater
detention was provided. Loop Road was part of approved
Master Plan/PUD for the site that CBBEL had previously
prepared.
Delany Road (Phase II), Waukegan: Design Engineer
responsible for portions of roadway design plans, and other
contract documents for reconstruction of 2 miles of Delany Road
from Sunset Avenue to Wadsworth Road. The existing facility
was expanded to a 5 -lane section bound by curb and gutter
with a closed drainage system, sidewalk based on geometric
studies, identification of ROW and permit requirements. Other
improvements included signals/channelization at intersections,
stormwater detention facilities, and soil remediation at floodway
culvert.
Linneman Road, Mount Prospect: Project included design of
removal and reconstruction. Roadway improvements included
widening Linneman Road to service the Briarwood Business
Center development by Opus Development. Street lighting
design plans were also included in the scope.
II C1 11AIVIORE1,,,,, , F) E
Page 2 of 3
S111 ID EVE ILOIP MCI IE INTT
Libertyville Campus Master Plan, Lake County: Project
Engineer responsible for coordinating with other professional
firms to prepare a Master Plan and Planned Unit Development
(PUD) for County's 175 -acre Libertyville Campus, located on the
northwest corner of Winchester Road and Milwaukee Avenue
(IL Route 21). Master Plan reflects current and future building,
site, transportation, environmental and infrastructure needs to
allow the County to continue to serve the County's constituents
in an efficient and sustainable manner. Extensive public meeting
participation was required to obtain PUD approval.
Lake County Jail Parking Lot, Waukegan: Project Engineer
responsible for development of a two-tier parking lot adjacent
to a ravine. Design included extensive retaining walls and an
underground detention structure. Lot included LED lighting,
ticketed gate entry, and electric car recharging stations.
Green Parking Lot, DeKalb: Project Engineer responsible for
plans and specifications to reconstruct a parking lot to consist
of a hybrid of traditional asphalt paving and new permeable
paving. This concept reduced the construction cost of a total
permeable pavement parking lot by approx. 30% but still
retained over 70% the stormwater from high frequency events.
The existing high pressure sodium lot lighting was replaced with
new high efficiency LED lights.
Washington Park, Downers Grove: The redevelopment of a
park site to provide stormwater improvements in the St. Joseph
Creek Watershed. Improvements included the addition of an
acrylic surface basketball court, two playground areas adjacent
to a fountain feature, two soccer fields, and a softball field which
included an under drain system and stadium style seating.
Fullersburg Woods Flat Bridge, Oak Brook: Project Engineer
responsible for preparation of construction documents to
build a new bridge that was designed to span over the entire
creek, eliminating any issues with debris build up on piers in
the creek. The bridge was also raised up above the 100 year
flood elevation and approach paths were reconstructed to
accommodate the higher elevations. Key features included
constructing a steel beam bridge with a timber fapade, decking
and railing to replicate the look of original bridge as well as fit
the look of the historic area. Bridge abutments incorporated
a limestone fapade and ledge rock to provide a more natural
look. The approach paths were reconfigured and raised, which
required off-site compensatory storage downstream on the
east side of York Road. CBBEL also worked with Forest Preserve
staff to reduce impact to surrounding trees, the highest quality
stand of oak trees in the Forest Preserve, while still providing
access for construction to the bridge. Coordination with Forest
Preserve staff was key to providing alternate designs that were in
turn approved by Forest Preserve Commissioners.
il
("hristol::)her If:',.. Burke Engineering, Il..Ld 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
51” IR IE IE"1"SCAPIE S
Devon Avenue Streetscape, Kedzie to Leavitt (Phase II),
Northwest Side, Chicago: Project Engineer responsible
for assisting in preparation of concept plans, design plans,
specifications and other contract documents for roadway and
streetscape improvements to 1.25 miles of Devon Avenue; from
Kedzie Avenue to Leavitt Street, and the first half -block of 21
side streets. Improvements included traffic calming by skinning
the parking lane by replacing curb and gutter 3' closer to
centerline and adding bump -outs to all corners. Improvements
also included storm sewer improvements, utility adjustments,
street milling/resurfacing, stamped intersections, crosswalks,
concrete bus pads, sidewalk and driveway replacement meeting
the City's strict ADA criteria, paver parkways, street lighting,
new trees, planters and sod, community identifiers on light
poles, and vertical gateway elements. Green initiatives included
lighting, trees, and recycling/re-use of material. Project was bid
as 5 separate construction projects.
95th Street Streetscape, Western to Ashland (Phase II),
Southwest Side, Chicago: Project Engineer responsible
for assisting in preparation of concept plans, design plans,
specifications and other contract documents for roadway
and streetscape improvements to 1.25 miles of 95th Street;
from Western Avenue to just east of Ashland Avenue, and the
first half -block of the 22 side streets. Improvements included
replacement of curb and gutter, storm sewer improvements,
median curb and nose improvements (creating pedestrian
refuge islands), utility adjustments, street milling/resurfacing,
stamped colored crosswalks, concrete bus pads, sidewalk and
driveway replacement meeting the City's strict ADA criteria,
paver parkways, street lighting, and new trees, planters and sod
and community identifiers on light poles and vertical gateway
elements. Green initiatives included lighting, trees, recycling/
re -use of materials, designing project around recently improved
spot segments of corridor. Project was bid as 3 separate
construction projects.
Lawrence Avenue Streetscape, Chicago River to Clark (Phase
II), Northeast Side, Chicago: Project Engineer responsible
for assisting in preparation of concept plans, design plans,
specifications and other contract documents for roadway and
streetscape improvements to 2 miles of Lawrence Avenue;
from the Chicago River to Clark Street, and the first half -block
of the 30 side streets. To better accommodate the multi -modal
nature of Lawrence Avenue, project provided a designated bike
lane and narrowed the roadway (from 4 to 3 lanes) to provide
additional pedestrian area. Improvements included replacement
of curb and gutter, storm sewer improvements, traffic signal
modifications, median curb and nose improvements (creating
pedestrian refuge islands), utility adjustments, street milling/
resurfacing, concrete bus pads, stamped colored crosswalks,
sidewalk and driveway replacement meeting the City's strict
ADA criteria, street lighting, and new trees, planters and sod and
community identifiers on light poles. Green initiatives included
lighting, bioswales, trees, permeable pavers, recycling/re-use
of materials, and under -parkway stormwater storage/infiltration
system. Project was bid as 2 separate construction projects.
II C1 11AIVIORE1„,,, , F) E
Page 3 of 3
Devon Avenue Streetscape, Ravenswood to Clark (Phase
11), North Side, Chicago: Project Engineer responsible for
assisting in preparation of design plans, specifications and other
contract documents for streetscape improvement to Devon
Avenue and the adjacent side streets. Improvements included
new sidewalk, stamped/colored sidewalk corners and ramps,
trees and other landscape items, driveway reconstruction,
pavement patching, milling & resurfacing of the roadways, new
street lighting and a Gateway Element Structure. Improvements
were designed to meet the City's stringent ADA requirements.
WATER MAlll'IJS
Water Main Replacement Projects (Various), Clarendon
Hills: Civil Engineer for design and preparation of construction
documents for replacement of the 11,300' of 4" and 6" water
main with a new 8" and 12" water main at various locations.
Responsibilities included preparation of plans and specifications
and coordination with Village Public Works; IEPA and IDOT
permits for work within the ROW; bid advertisement and award
recommendations.
Ela Road and Cornell Avenue Water Main, Barrington: Civil
Engineer for design and preparation of construction documents
as well as bidding assistance. Proposed improvements included
construction of a new 8" diameter ductile iron water main on
Cornell Avenue from Cook Street to Division Street (approx.
1300 LF), and a new 10" diameter ductile iron water main on
Ela Road from Lake Cook Road to Balmoral Lane and Balmoral
Lane from Tudor Drive to Ela Road (approx. 700 LF). Scope
included applying for and receipt of required TEPA permit prior
to construction. Project also required application for IDOT and
Cook County Permit for work within the Ela Road ROW and
Barrington Township Permit for work within the Cornell ROW.
Lake Cook Road Water Main, Barrington: Civil Engineer for
design and preparation of construction documents and bidding
assistance. Project included construction of a new 10' diameter
ductile iron water main on Lake Cook Road from Wesley Street
to Wyngate Drive (approx. 3,800 LF). Scope included applying
for and receipt of required TEPA permit prior to construction,
as well as IDOT Permit for the work within the Lake Cook Road
ROW.
il
";;hristol::zher If:',.. Burke Engineering, Ii L'1. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
J 0 ��H N VI U ��R � ��H Y« � � ^ � � S
Vice President, Head, Survey Department
Professional Engineer and Land Surveyor accountable for managing office and field survey
°
YEARS EXPBR11EINCIE 32
personnel- Responsibilities include establishment and maintenance of survey procedures;
Y1EA1R5VwODHIIC1313EL� 19
budgets and contract preparation; logistical planning and research; and supervision of staff and
calculations ofsurvey data.
EIDLICA1100IN
Bachelor nfScience, 1987
PIR01FESS11011NAIL, 11-AIN11) SUIRVIEfUING
Civil Engineering
Wentworth Institute of
AO7\�\CSyN Land Title Surveys
Technology
The preparation of'Y\L�\/ACSK1 Land Title Io,voy''that meet the current accuracy standards
jointly adopted 6yALTA, A[SK4and NSPSFor purposes ofTitle Insurance Companies toinsure
I 155111 INA LRIEGU5TIRATU0IN
title to land without exceptions as to the many matters which might be evidenced by public
Professional Land Surveyor, IL,
records Some projects include-
035003421, 2001
Professional Land Surveyor, IN,
° Major General Emmett J Bean Center, Lawrence, |N
20400062'2004
° Prairie Holdings Corporation, Grayslake
Professional Land Surveyor,
° Hyatt, Lisle
MA, 40040,1997
° Hyatt, Deerfield
Professional Land Surveyor, WI,
� Hyatt, Rosemont
2548-8, 2000
° AAOIBui|6inS' Rosemont
Professional Engineer, MA,
° Fashion (�ut|etsofChicago, Rosemont
1999
41050 P f i | E i ' IL,
Professional Engineer,
M
O62O61506atofAnn�xat|�m ' 2009
Thepreparationof''P|atofAnnexation''nuitab|efuramunicipa|itytoannex|andthatis
PRO FES5U() INA LAlFF|LUATx0 INS
contiguous to their municipality. Some municipalities prepared for include:
NSPS'ACSMSurvey Technician
Certification Program
° Crestwood
° Elk Grove Village
Illinois Professional Land
° F|oomoor
Surveyors Association
° Franklin Park
° Hawthorn Woods
Indiana Society ofProfessional
° Roselle
Land Surveyors
° Woodridge
Wisconsin Society of Land
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Districts
Surveyors
The preparation of a written legal description and at times a plat depicting an area of a
municipality designated for Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District. Some municipalities
Forest Park
°
Franklin Park
°
Glendale Heights
° Hig6woo6
°
Melrose Park
° K1onee
° Posen
°Richton Park
°
River Forest
° R000Uo
°
Rosemont
° Skokie
°
South Chicago Heights
° Shorewood
° Steger
Plat qfVacation
The preparation of "Plat ofVacation^ suitable for a municipality tovacate pubic streets, alleys
or easements. Some municipalities prepared for include:
~
Chicago Ridge
°
Grayslake
"
Hawthorn Woods
°
Rosemont 11B
Christopher 3. 11:1,mrke Eingineeiring, Ltd 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 8478230500 1 F- 8478210520 1 cbbel.com
I....AII 11) Si„DIRV1EY11ING SII IRVIIClES
Chicago Water Partners (1999-2017): CBBEL is currently
retained by the City of Chicago to provide topographic survey
and base drawings production for over 100 miles of water main
replacement projects affecting more than 300 City streets.
CBBEL is responsible for the completion of base map design
plans according to Chicago Department of Water Standards.
We also coordinate our MBE and WBE subconsultants for
each project to ensure adherence to said standards and timely
completion of projects. It is necessary to base all data on IL East
State Plane Coordinates NAD'83 to conform to City of Chicago
GIS Applications, compute all ROW retracement, review final
plans, and submit finished product packages to Chicago Water
Partners. This project has also encompassed a generation of
base maps for the client's use with the ADA special ramp design
and construction projects maintaining CDOT Standards.
1-90, Elgin Tollbooth to US Route 20, Illinois Tollway: Survey
Manager for design and roadway reconstruction. The existing
roadway will be widened both east and west bound directions.
Surveying responsibilities included creation of a signed and
sealed "Plat of Highway" for acquisition of ROW and easements
along project corridor per Tollway/IDOT Standards. Required
document research for the reestablishment of ROW lines, parcel
lines and section lines along the project, and coordination of
field crews for field survey and recon to obtain existing field
evidence of existing boundary lines and ROW; calculation and
analysis of data to determine existing boundaries and ROW; and
coordination of drafting of the "Plat of Highway" along with the
writing of legal descriptions for various easements to be acquired
for project. Along with existing conditions survey of the project
corridor, including stream surveys and cross sections every 100'.
1-294 Balmoral Off Ramp, Illinois Tollway, Rosemont: Survey
Manager for design and roadway construction. The new ramp is
a northbound only exit ramp leading into Rosemont. Surveying
responsibilities included creation of signed and sealed "Plats
of Acquisitions" for acquisition of ROW and easements along
project corridor per Cook County DOT Standards. Required
document research for the reestablishment of ROW lines, parcel
lines and section lines along the project, and coordination of
field crews for field survey and recon to obtain existing field
evidence of existing boundary lines and ROW; calculation and
analysis of data to determine existing boundaries and ROW;
and coordination of drafting of the "Plat of Highway" along
with the writing of legal descriptions for various easements to
be acquired for project. Also the field surveying of an Existing
Conditions survey of the project corridor.
MWRD Property (163.0 AC), Palos Hills: Survey Manager for
determination of the boundaries of MWRD's parcels 6.01, 7.01
and 8.03, and preparation of written legal descriptions of the
overall boundaries to be used for executing legal agreements.
Provided a Boundary Survey for 163 acres of land lying adjacent
to the Calumet -Sag Channel which involved extensive research
at the Cook County Recorder's Office and other public agencies
to obtain recorded and unrecorded documents of the subject
site. Required coordination of field crews for field survey and
recon to obtain existing field evidence on the subject site to aid
in the determination of the existing boundaries utilizing GPS and
conventional survey methods. Calculations along with analysis of
J INS IIID VI LJI IIS IIS IIH Y, IP IIS , IP IIS
Page 2 of 3
research documents and collected field data to determine the
existing boundaries of the subject property for the creation of
an overall "Plat of Survey".
TRAN5P0IR.IiA.1'IIOIN
1-80 Resurfacing (Harlem Avenue to 1-294), IDOT. Survey
Manager overseeing drafting and quantity calculations for 6
miles of 1-80. The $16 million project included surveying tasks
completed almost entirely at night. All documentation was
prepared in accordance with ARRA requirements, the IDOT
Construction Manual and the Project Procedures Guide.
Golf Road, Rolling Meadows: Established horizontal and
vertical control for Phase I roadway design. Also established
existing ROW for purposes of land acquisitions and the
preparation of a plat of highway suitable for submittal to IDOT.
Project length of approximately 0.75 miles.
INFRASTRUCTURE
GIS, Rolling Meadows: Project Manager for updating and
augmenting the City's existing GIS Base Map address and street
databases. City's original data was 5 years old and work entailed
the addition of recently added subdivisions and commercial
property, along with adding and naming of all private streets.
Performed an overall QA/QC of existing data to bring it up to
date and match existing databases within Public Works, Police
and Fire Departments, and Community Development. Also, for
the Public Works Department: established a City-wide base map
to be used by all levels of government including design of street
and address maps; updating and design of digital storm, sanitary
and water utility maps for use in City's GIS; coordination of
workstation setup and installation with single license of ArcView
and Arc Reader; and for Police and Fire Departments: assisted
in the design and creation of the City's 911 response street and
address databases.
GIS, Glendale Heights: Project Manager for preparation of
GIS Base Maps and Utility Atlases. The Village wanted to set up
Village -Wide Base Maps for use in coordination of operations
involving underground utilities. Utilized the current Village atlases,
although outdated, to expedite the start-up. Created a base
map in Phase I comprised of information obtained from DuPage
County GIS Department. Performed QA/QC to make the data
consistent with the existing Village address and street maps. Also
"rubber sheeted" the existing atlas information for all utilities
onto the base sheets in data compatible with ESRI's ArcView 9.0
software. In Phase II, created a pilot program for atlases for the
water, sanitary and storm infrastructure. Utility atlases for two
quarter sections were developed based on field observations with
the use of GPS and conventional surveying methods. Standard
GPS and handheld GPS methodologies were compared based on
cost, accuracy, and Village utility. Both methods still required field
crews to collect pipe sizes and inverts. Our field crews surveyed
the locations of all storm, sanitary and water structures for two of
the quarter sections. Separate atlases were completed for each
utility. CBBEL assisted the Village in setting up computers for use
with the software and GIS database.
III
Christopher I3. ILimrlke Il ingiineeirinrng, ILtd. 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
GIS, Huntley: Project Manager for preparation of GIS Base
Maps and Utility Atlases. The Village is in the process of
setting up Village -Wide Base Maps for use in coordination of
operations involving underground utilities. Utilized the current
Village atlases, although outdated, to expedite the start-up.
Created base maps comprised of information obtained from
the McHenry and Kane County GIS Department. Performed
QA/QC to make the data consistent with the existing Village
address and street maps. CBBEL created atlases for the water,
sanitary and storm infrastructure. Utility atlases are being
developed based on field observations with the use of GPS and
conventional surveying methods. Our field crews surveyed the
locations of all storm, sanitary and water structures for two of
the quarter sections. Separate atlases were completed for each
utility. CBBEL assisted the Village in setting up computers for
use with the software and GIS database.
J INS IIID VI LI IIS IIS IIH Y, IP IIS , IP IIS
Page 3 of 3
III
Christopher I3. IL,mrlke Il ingiineeirinrng, Ltd 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
IIS III A M GIIII IL IIS IIS "T "T, R IIS
Project Surveyor
Professional Land Surveyor responsible for preparing and directing survey crews and survey
YEARS IFiitlPIF':IRIIIF':INICE:, 31
department drafters through the completion of assigned projects. Assists Survey Department
YIF':AIR'S WIIIFIhB tmmIIRIIRIIEaIL.:, 18
Manager with bid and proposal preparation, quality control standards and review of finished
Professional Malpractice
products; perform office computations, GPS post processing, real property research and client
Fil ttlUt;A"Il IICIN
Bachelor of Arts, 1985
contact for design, construction and real property survey projects.
Geography
PIL...A"n"'S CIF II 111G11 IIWAY
State University of New York
1-90 (Elgin Tollbooth to IL Route 20): Project Surveyor for design and roadway reconstruction.
at Buffalo
The existing roadway is to be widened both EB and WB directions. Surveying responsibilities
IIF'IF': 51110INA1I IRIIEX311 5"'IFIRA'IFII0IN
included assisting Survey Manager in the creation of a signed and sealed "Plat of Highway"
Professional Land Surveyor,
for acquisition of ROW and easements along project corridor per Tollway/IDOT Standards.
NY, 050502, 2002
Responsible for coordination of field crews for field survey and recon to obtain existing field
Easements thru Case Law
evidence of ROW monumentation; calculation, post processing, and analysis of GPS Static and
PIR0IFM"IfIS.SSI1110INA IL.IIDIIE°a IE111110IPI llw' IIrRIF
Rinex Data necessary for final primary survey control monumentation; coordination of all field
GPS Planning
Observations and Use
crews needed for topographic design survey and aerial control survey tasks. Responsible for
quality control of all collected field data necessary to complete Existing Conditions survey of
Understanding Land and
project corridor, including stream surveys and cross sections every 100'.
Boundary Disputes
1-294 Balmoral Off Ramp, Rosemont: Project Surveyor for design and roadway construction.
State Plane Coordinates
The new ramp is a NB only exit ramp leading into Rosemont. Responsible for coordination of
field crews for field survey and recon to obtain field evidence of existing boundary lines and
Professional Malpractice
ROW; QA/QC and analysis of field data, and correlation of field data with NGS, O'Hare Airport,
and Ethics
and Village of Rosemont local datums within the project corridor. Coordination of drafting of
GIS Implementation and Tools
existing conditions (design) survey and J.U.L.I.E. Utility Atlas and record data.
Balmoral Avenue Extension, Chicago, O'Hare and Rosemont: Project Surveyor for design of
Running a Successful
Surveying Business
Balmoral Ave overpass of Mannheim Rd. Surveying responsibilities included creation of signed
and sealed plats for acquisition of ROW and easements along project corridor. Responsible for
The Rectangular Land System
coordination of field surveying of an Existing Conditions survey of project corridor. Performed
office and field work necessary to quantify existing bridge/beam/abutment details, office QA/
Easements thru Case Law
QC of collected field data & assisted with final review of existing conditions/topographic survey.
GPS Vector Processing and
Butterfield Road (North), Libertyville, LCDOT: Responsible for real property research
Concepts Implemented in
"Pages" Software Suite
necessary to recreate existing ROW. Assisted with establishment of horizontal and vertical
control for Phase I Roadway Plat of Highway Design. Coordinated onsite J.U.L.I.E. underground
New York State Surveyors
meetings and reconciled utility atlas with survey field data to be reflected on existing conditions
Conference 2001, 2002, 2004,
survey. Project length approx. 2 miles.
2010 and 2014
Route 83 and Peterson Road, Libertyville, LCDOT: Established horizontal and vertical Illinois Land Surveyors
control for Phase I Roadway Design. Performed real property research, field work, and Conference 2001 & 2004
office calculations necessary to establish existing ROW. Coordinated project with LCDOT in
accordance with their survey specifications. American Congress on
Surveying and Mapping
Delany Road Widening, Gurnee, LCDOT: Coordinated control and existing conditions survey Conference 2006 & 2007
with LCDOT and,in accordance with that departments revised specifications, established IIF'IESSl1110INA I AIIFFIIIILIIIIATII0INS
horizontal and vertical control for Phase I Roadway Design. Also, established ROW for purposes National Society of
of land acquisitions and preparation of a plat of highway suitable for submittal. Performed real Professional Surveyors
property research, reviewed title reports and prepared legal descriptions for land acquisition.
Project length of approx. 3 miles. New York State Association of
Professional Land Surveyors
Chapel Hill Road Improvements, MCDOT: Responsible for real property research, field work
coordination and final calculation and retracement of existing ROW. Directed GPS observation Niagara Frontier Land
and office processing of field data, coordinated, computed and reviewed final plat of ROW. Surveyors Association
Butterfield Road (South), Libertyville, LCDOT: Assisted with real property research, written
legal descriptions and office support for the establishment and monumentation of County Rd
improvement takings and easements. Project length approx. 2 miles.
iia" UIY II::)AIRY/AII„'n'A/AC"SII I II,,,AINI[) 'I`If°n'.Il,,,lf;l; SU1R If:::YS
Department of Planning and Development (2006-2010), Chicago: Directed boundary field
work, performed records research, computations, analysis and review of various plats of survey
for final review by PLS. Coordinated with client and subcontractors to perform Category 2: 11B
Complex Land Surveying - Acquisition and Disposition Services, for 25 parcels including PIN
Christopher I3. IL1,mrlke Il ingiineeirinrng, Ltd 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 F: 847.823.0520 cbbel.com
Divisions, T.I.F., Encroachment clarification and Land Disposition
Services.
#2850 Oak Street, Bellwood: Directed boundary field work,
performed records research, computations, analysis and review
of preliminary plat of utility easement for final review by PLS.
Coordinated with client and client's attorney to address location,
provisions, and legal description for said easement.
I OW/.n.OIPOGIIRAIPIH11C SURVEYS
US Route 45 Millburn Bypass — Aerial Control Survey, Lake
County: Coordination with IDOT Field Personnel (onsite) and
Aerial Survey Engineers necessary to install and locate +40 aerial
targets. Processed and adjusted observed GPS data to conform
with existing IDOT GPS Network. This work was performed
along 5+ miles of US Route 45.
Chicago Water Partners/CTR Joint Venture 2001-2017
Construction Projects, Chicago: Topographic survey and base
drawing development for Water Main Reconstruction projects.
ROW research, calculations and determination for more than 300
streets encompassing over 100 total project miles. Responsible
for field and finished product Quality Control, supervision of
ADA Ramp Design Surveys (>60 corners), and coordination with
subconsultant team.
Cantigny Park New Leaf Revitalization, DuPage County:
CBBEL assisted Cantigny Park with completing a physical master
plan by performing detailed Utility and Topographic Survey of
the 200 Acre Project Area indicated by the client. This process
included field checking and horizontal position updates of
changes to physical improvements within the work limits (i.e.
existing buildings, lighting, drive/parking areas, wetlands, tree
species identification, underground utilities, etc.).
Nuclear Station Decommissioning, Zion: Assisted Project
Manager for stormwater, floodplain and wetland permitting
associated within decommissioning of Zion Nuclear Station on
Lake Michigan by providing existing conditions Topographic
Survey of this secured site. Processed and adjusted observed
GPS data to correlate with established NGS Geodetic
Monumentation for final Topographic Survey product.
COINS"i"'IRUC"IFIIOIN SURVEYS
Chicago Water Partners/CTR Joint Venture 2001 -Present
Construction Projects, Chicago: Topographic survey and
base drawing development for Water Main Reconstruction
projects. ROW research, calculations and determination for over
250 streets encompassing ±75 total project miles. Responsible
for field and finished product Quality Control, supervision of
ADA Ramp Design Surveys (>60 corners), and coordination with
subconsultant team.
Morton Arboretum Branching Out Improvement, Lisle:
Coordinated with site general contractor, 12 subcontractors, site
designers, and client. Provided construction calculations and
layout of proposed parking areas, visitor center, Meadow Lake
reconstruction, and four -acre Children's Garden Activity Area.
IIS III A D GIIII IL IIS IIS "T "T, RIIS
Page 2 of 2
City of Chicago Department of Sewer (W. Sunnyside from
N. Damen to N. Hamilton, N. Hamilton from Sunnyside to
W. Windsor, W. Windsor from N. Hamilton to N. Leavitt):
Worked extensively on the survey control and existing
conditions for proposed sewer improvements following
standards utilized by the City of Chicago Sewer Department.
City of Chicago Department of Sewer (W. 66th Place from
S. Pulaski to S. Springfield, S. Springfield from 66th to W.
Marquette): Worked extensively on the survey control and
existing conditions for proposed sewer improvements following
standards utilized by the City of Chicago Sewer Department.
O'Hare Airport C.V.I.A. Sites, Chicago: Coordination with
Airport consultants, contractor and Department of Aviation
Engineers to perform Topographic and Construction Layout
Surveys for three inspections sites.
O'Hare F.A.C.E. Project, Chicago: Coordinated with site
engineering consultants to assist with control and construction
layout verification by others. Said services included verification
of caissons piers and bolt pattern layout as related to canopy
and curtain wall construction for terminals 2 & 3 (on going).
Modular Site Development, Chicago Public Schools:
Coordinated survey crews and preformed office calculations to
provide construction layout for proposed site improvements at
Oglesby Elementary and Edwards Elementary schools.
95th Street Extension, WCDOT. Assisted coordination
of aerial survey control in State Plane Coordinate System
by applying GPS Network for approx. 1.5 miles of roadway
construction and improvements_
GIS SURVEYS
Glendale Heights: Part of team charged with developing
attribute collection format, to be utilized by both handheld
and RTK GPS units. Responsible for post processing and
coordinate transformation of handheld GPS data. Coordinated
with in-house GIS team to format and export all GPS data to be
integrated into ARClnfo Software_
Rolling Meadows: Part of team charged with developing
attribute collection format to be utilized by both handheld and
RTK GPS units. Coordinated with in-house GIS team to format
and export all GPS data to be integrated into ARClnfo Software.
Coordinated City's on-site post processing software.
Elmwood Park: Assisted Project Manager in preparation of
GIS Base Maps, and Utility Atlases. Post processed GPS data
necessary to compile unique coordinate system compatible with
existing Utility Atlas Vertical Datum.
11B
Chrii utolralhraeir I3. IL,mrlte Il ingiineeirinrng, Ltd 9575 W. Higgins Road, Suite 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 P: 847.823.0500 1 F: 847.823.0520 1 cbbel.com
%i '
1
CBBEL has worked successfully with many municipalities
and counties in preparing drainage studies or ordinances
focused on aIleviatingstormwater issues and incorporating
Best Management Practices (BMP's). As requested in your
Statement of Qualifications, we understand the Village's
needs and are certain we can provide a drainage study
that will help alleviate future stormwater issues.
We offer you expertise gained over nearly three decades
of work focused on planning, design and engineering
for all things related to stormwater management and
municipal infrastructure. This expansive experience
allows us to identify unique opportunities that may not
always be obvious. The firms who approach the Village
to perform the requested tasks should certainly have
the skills to do the work; however, we feel that often it
is the subtle or less apparent skills that can make the
difference between success and failure. Our approach
is often one of a fresh, unbiased perspective backed by
a wealth of experience that can make the desired end a
reality. CBBEL is grounded in understanding the client
and the end product. CBBEL has a proven record of
meeting project deadlines and client expectations on
deliverables. Included in this section are recent projects
performed that are very similar to this project as well as
references we encourage you to contact.
IR: III.i.c III°° III.i..; ICS E N C III.....
Village of Elmwood Park Paul Volpe 708.452.3913
11 Conti Parkway pvolpe@elmwoodpark.org
Elmwood Park, IL 60707
City of Elmhurst Howard Killian 630.530.3041
209 North York Street howard.killian@elmhurst.org
Elmhurst, IL 60126
Village of River Forest Eric Palm 708.714.3520
400 Park Avenue epalm@vrf.us
River Forest, IL 60305
City of Park Ridge Wayne Zingsheim 847.318.5247
505 Butler Place wzingshe@parkridge.us
Park Ridge, IL 60068
VII LMVI VAI:: IVCUI`d IIYC)SP" C..I.. I I VI' ;7 L /\N 1)SIDL IMI..R IVI''IMI I11i Is C:IIPH L
u::IF OJu::: r...u......u...Yu::)u:::.
�,..,,,�...............
Comprehensive Flood
";„11°......:?...0
Plan
Hydrologic and
Hydraulic Modeling
Probable Cost
Stormwater Regulations
Review
2011 2014
F)RQJu;;;;;C..II„ ..II°'u;;;;:Al
Christopher Burke, PhD, PE
Principal, QA/QC
Thomas Burke, PhD, PE
Project Manager
Michael Cothard, PE
Project Engineer
Stephanie Nurre, PE
Project Engineer
Luke Sherry, PE
Project Engineer
Cu,,,,,ll ENT
City of Elmhurst
p,,,`A;;;;°E
$392 thousand
F:UNDIINC SOURCE
Local
CBM devebped a Comprehensive flood pWi that incWed drainage
improvements, flood proofing, constructing new r Hef sewers, creating
stormwater r stora , and increasing pumping capacity,
uring the July 23-24, 2010 storm event,
the City of Elmhurst (City) received
uuuumuw approximately seven inches of rainfall
over 12 hours that overwhelmed the local existing
storm sewer system and resulted in extensive,
city-wide flood damage. Over 500 residents in the
City reported various types of flooding during the
storm event that included sanitary surcharging,
street and yard flooding, overland flow into homes,
flow down reverse slope driveways and seepage
and sump pump failures.
Based on flood questionnaires prepared by the
City and submitted by the residents, as well as
historical data, the City identified ten flood study
areas. CBBEL was contracted by the City to
perform a flood study based on the flooding from
the July 23-24, 2010 rainfall event in these areas.
The primary goals of the study were to determine
the extent and cause of the flooding and provide
solutions to reduce the risk of future flooding.
Utilizing the flood questionnaires, DuPage County
topographic mapping, detailed sewer information
and other data provided by the City, CBBEL
developed hydrologic and hydraulic modeling
using XP -SWM M computer software for each of the
ten flood study areas. Based on the results of the
XP-SWMM modeling, the causes of flooding were
identified and conceptual drainage improvements
were developed. Cost estimates were prepared
for the proposed drainage improvements and
compared to the increased level of flood protection.
Because some of the conceptual drainage
improvements resulted in increased flows to Salt
Creek, an FEQ hydraulic analysis was performed
to determine the compensatory requirements for
the alternatives. CBBEL also performed a review
of the stormwater practices currently required
by the City to improve the performance of the
stormwater drainage system.
CBBEL presented the results to the City Council
and Stormwater Task Force. The recommended
drainage improvements included flood proofing,
constructing new relief sewers, creating
stormwater storage, and increasing pumping
capacity.
SERVICES INCLUDED:
• Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling
• Compensatory Storage Analysis
• Opinions of Probable Cost for
each Alternative
• Review of City Stormwater Regulations
• Flood Study Presentations to Stormwater
Task Force and City Council
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. I Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T. 847.823.05001 c.b b e] c..o m..
I1:D11:R0JI1::::::C...I......I...'ll:::
l......
Topographic Survey
Hydrologic and
Hydraulic Modeling
u
Full -Time Construction
Observation
� aj~
fpV
Utility Coordination
"
J�1�11110111��11��
Resident Coordination
2015 2016
V:-)ROJu;;;;;C..II„ ..II°'u;;;;:Al
Jason Souden, PE
Project Manager - Design
Lee Fell, PE
Design Engineer - Design
W. Daniel Crosson, PE
Project Manager - Construction
Patrick Kielty, PE
Resident Engineer
Luke Sherry, PE
Water Resources Engineer
Cu,,,,,ll ENT
City of Elmhurst
CONS "II'"RUC "'If"IION COS 11
$4.7 million
!:::`EE
$300 thousand
u„°UNDIING SOURCE
Local
I...Ih Wallnu-t/lMyrtle/l::.::.::vergreeIn CtOrrnw t r
1lrnlprove ment I:::)rOj Ct Was d sIgn d t0 reduce
frequent, severe residential tlx: oding by
constructing relief sewer to h ndue overflows
from the exisfing storm sewer systern, and
drain thein into the Elmhurst Quarry rr I1:::::'1ood
Control II--Cillit.
111"""”' 1111""""'he Walnut/Evergreen/Myrtle Stormwater
Improvement Project was constructed in
2016 and consists of the installation of
approximately 4,000 LF of storm sewer ranging
in size from 60 to 72" in diameter. Additionally,
approximately 800 LF of new water main and
1,200 LF of new sanitary sewer were also
constructed as part of this project.
The proposed project provides a 100 -year level
of flood protection for 52 homes located in the
northwest section of the City. These homes
experienced overland flooding during the severe
storm events of June 2010, July 2010 and April
2013. The pipe serves as a relief sewer that
handles overflow from the existing storm sewer
and conveys it to the Elmhurst Quarry, which is
owned and operated by DuPage County as a
flood control reservoir on Salt Creek.
CBBEL provided a full range of engineering
services for this project, including topographic
survey, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling,
preliminary engineering, final engineering, bid
assistance, and construction observation. This
project also involved extensive coordination with
the DuPage County Department of Stormwater
Management and also included permitting
through that agency.
DESIGN SERVICES INCLUDED:
• Topographic Survey
• Geotechnical Investigation/CCDD Analysis
• XP-SWMM Hydrologic and Hydraulic
Model Analysis
• Utility Coordination
• Permitting (DuPage County)
• Plans Specifications and Estimates
• Bid Documents
• Bidding Assistance
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INCLUDED:
• Full time construction observation
• Daily Coordination with residents
• Project coordination with Nicor, AT&T, and
DuPage County Stormwater Management
• Documentation as outlined in (DOT's Project
Procedures Guide
• Processing of all permit related paperwork for
DuPage County Stormwater Management
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. ( Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T: 847.823.05001 c. bbe],;,,a;Q m..
II fiu, C.I... I.his
l projeCt Was a sewer separation project 'Ct
A C E Cdesigned establish JCafaC storm and sanitary
Topographic Survey sewer systems in the
a
predominantly residential
11 Hydrologic and northern portion Of the Village.
mi.�i�w�u�u �umumumnmumumaa, Hydraulic Modeling
(� Utility Coordination
onstruction of the project included a new 9-foot by 6-foot outfall to the Des Plaines River with
Plans and Specifications internal energy dissipation, as well as a 9-foot by 6-foot box culvert, over 20,000 feet of storm
a
Csewers ranging in size from 12 inches to 96 inches in diameter, large cast-in-place concrete
conflict structures, extensive combined/sanitary sewer and water main relocations, sewer and water
9
Permitting
Vfq�nu�i� service replacements, and roadway reconstruction and resurfacing.
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""' Construction of an advance contract was initiated in Fall 2014 and the entire project was substantially
2013 ..... 2015 completed in November 2015, on budget and ahead of schedule.
F)ROJEC 11 11 EAM SERVICES INCLUDED:
Bryan Welch, PE
Project Manager CBBEL was retained by the Village to provide the following design, permitting and construction
Mark Thomas, PE engineering services for Northside Stormwater Management project:
Project Engineer • Topographic Survey
Donald Dressel, PE • Geotechnical Investigation/CCDD Analysis
Hydrologic/Hydraulic Modeling
• XP-SWMM Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model Analysis
John Murphy, PE
Survey Utility Coordination
Orion Galey, PE • IEPA WPCLP Loan Assistance
Resident Engineer • Preliminary Plans, Specifications and Estimates
Cu.....IIENT • Permitting (MWRD, FPDCC, USCOE, IDNR, IDOT, IEPA)
Village of River Forest • Final Plans Specifications and Estimates
CONS IIRUC IIION COS II"• Bid Documents
$15 million • Bidding Assistance
u"lE • Construction Observation
$1.2 million
V°°UNDIINC SOURCE
�,,.-.,n IIIIIIIIIIII
Local
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. ( Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T: 847.823.0500 I .c be.l,,;,c,Q,m,
F:1FROUEC Y F:) E F'he F:)mrk FRidge 1::::'iood [Reduction Project F:)hase 1 was the first phase of
a mu�~��r eff�hm�dUceR�d^n~ � at k~ �a���ac���e��t,
Topographic Survey ~
' n ^ BBELcomp��daUooda�dy�2OOSof��key�oodnBa�ao�x�eCit6which was 9mm9�d
Hydraulic Modeling the major rains of September 2008. The recommended drainage improvements included
flood -proofing, oon/dmohng new relief uewem, creating atnmxwater ab`nsQe' and increasing
Permitting pumping capacity.
Utility Coordination The project consisted ofthe construction ofrelief storm sewers ranging from 12^ to 24" in diameter,
relief sewer structures ranging from 4'b 8'in diameter, sanitary sewer and water service adjustments,
pavement patching, uudxandgu#orandoidov�|knemova|andnap|aoomontandparkwmymotonsdon
Fu||'TimoConotmodon ' .
Engineering Construction of the first phase of the Flood Reduction project was completed in Fall 2012. The second
phase ofthe project iocurrently underway and will bacompleted inSpring 2O14.
SERVICES INCLUDED:
2011 2012
. Topographic survey
F)ROJEC 11 11 EAM ^ Geotechnical investigation
JaaonGoudon PE
' ^ Sewer televising
Principal
Bryan Welch, PE ^ Hydraulic modeling
Project Manager ^ Preliminary design development
VinnyVVmb|owaki. PE ^ Permitting (I DOT, MVVR[)
Resident Engineer
^ Utility coordination and relocations
JoffJu|kowoki PE
' ^ Preparation ofconstruction documents
Stomwmte/Modeling
^ Full-time construction engineering
CI UENT
City ofPark Ridge
CONS 11 RUC 11 ION COS 11
$1.2 million
F:�EE
$225 thousand
F:�UNDING SOURCE
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. I Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 T. 847.823.0500 1c. b b e] cQ m..
F:IFROJEC YF:)E
Topographic Survey
Hydraulic Modeling
Permitting
,6
ffljt
Utility Coordination
Full -Time Construction
Engineering
2013
F)ROJEC 11 11 EAM
Jason Souden, PE
Principal
Bryan Welch, PE
Project Manager
Vinny Wroblewski, PE
Resident Engineer
Jeff Julkowski, PE
Stormwater Modeling
CI IENT
City of Park Ridge
CONS 11 RUC 11 ION COS 11
$1.5 million
F:`EE
$160 thousand
F:�UNDING SOURCE
Local
I[ " )uring heavy rains, 1.3urton and Fenton Il...anes are Often impassable and
have caused flooding of homes on severM occasions,,
CBBEL completed a Citywide Sewer Study in 2011 of the entire City, which was prompted by the
major rains of September 2008. The study involved computer modeling of the City's entire sewer
system, and led to a multi-year program of various flood reduction projects. The recommended
drainage improvements included flood -proofing, constructing new relief sewers, creating stormwater
storage, and increasing pumping capacity.
One of the major recurring problem area existed on Burton and Fenton Lanes. The problems are
exacerbated by several homes with reverse slope driveways that are particularly susceptible to
flooding. Using the Citywide Sewer Study, a nearby sewer system was identified that had available
capacity. A 42" relief sewer system was designed to convey stormwater from Burton and Fenton Lanes
to the existing sewer, providing relief to these streets.
SERVICES INCLUDED:
• Topographic survey
• Geotechnical investigation
• Sewer televising
• Hydraulic modeling
• Preliminary design development
• MWRD Permitting
• Utility coordination and relocations
• Preparation of construction documents
• Full-time construction engineering
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. I Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T. 847.823.05001 c. b b e] cQ m..
F:IFROJu:::. Y...u......u... F:)u:::.
l
Topographic Survey
Geotechnical Investigation
,ol"1If1V;;;
pp
Hydraulic Modeling
Permitting
F9
Utility Coordination
2012 ..... 201
V) R CJ u;;;;; C ..I I....I I.. u;;;;: A l
Jason Souden, PE
Principal
Bryan Welch, PE
Project Manager
Patrick Kielty, PE
Resident Engineer
Jeff Julkowski, PE
Stormwater Modeling
John Murphy, PE, PLS
Survey
Cu.....Il ENT
City of Park Ridge
CONS '"If"RUC"'II'"ION COS 11
$2.8 million
u,,lE
$300 thousand
F:°UNDIINC SCURCA;;;;;
Local
Ihe Park 11RId j:::::1ducti irn Project has Was the second Iphase
of a niuffi....year br[ to reduce flooding at key areas across the Dty.
BBEL completed a flood study in 2009 of six key flooding areas for the City, which was prompted
by the major rains of September 2008. The recommended drainage improvements included
flood -proofing, constructing new relief sewers, creating stormwater storage, and increasing
pumping capacity.
The project consisted of the construction of relief storm sewers ranging from 12" to 48" in diameter,
relief sewer structures ranging from 4' to 10' in diameter, specialty cast -in-place junction chambers,
sanitary sewer and water service adjustments, pavement patching, curb and gutter and sidewalk
removal and replacement and parkway restoration. Construction of the second phase of the Flood
Reduction project is underway and will be completed in Spring 2014.
SERVICES INCLUDED:
• Topographic survey
• Geotechnical investigation
• Hydraulic modeling
• Preliminary design development
• Permitting (TEPA, MWRD)
• Utility coordination and relocations
• Preparation of construction documents
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. I Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T. 847.823.05001 c. bbe],;,,a;Q m..
2009 .....2013
V) R OJ u;;;;; C °.I I.....I I.. u;;;;: A l
Darren Olson, PE
Project Manager
Lee Fell, PE
Civil Design Lead
Emily Anderson, PE
Water Resources Engineer
Jedd Anderson, PWS
Wetland/Native
Planting Design
William Schultz, EI
Structural Engineer
Dave Dobson, PE
Resident Engineer
Cu.....11 ENT
Village of Bartlett
DuPage County Stormwater
CONS I[RUC "'II'"ION COS 11
$5.3 million
F:,EE
$350 thousand
F:°UNDIINC SOURCE
Local
un response t0 flooding in September 2008, CBBEU..... ��
and the uuu . citBartlett worked with Du � e ACEC
County ��t�.� rn t r, the )r st a r s ry District
of DuPage County my (FI1D C) and the Bartlett F:)ark l%ASCE
District trict t0eMo drainage improvements tOr
the Brewster Crash I....leadwat rs. a��)�9
A:1mn
atershed Plan was developed and approved in February 2010 that identified conveyance
provements and flood storage that would provide a 100 -year level of protection to 11 homes,
e state highway (IL 59), a County roadway (Stearns Road) and multiple roadways within the
Bartlett Estates Subdivision. The project included 4,000 LF of 15" diameter storm sewer in the Wayne
Grove Forest Preserve, 2,000 LF of 60" storm sewer under Stearns Road (600' to be tunneled under
the intersection of IL 59 and Stearns Road) and a 58 acre -ft flood storage basin/wetland and dam on
the Pratt's Wayne Woods Forest Preserve. The project was successfully constructed in 2013.
SERVICES INCLUDED:
• Watershed Plan preparation mapping • Site topographic survey and utility
• Unsteady HEC -RAS Hydrologic/ • Preparation of plans, specifications,
hydraulic modeling and bid documents
• Design coordination with the Village, • Permitting through DuPage County,
DuPage County, FPDDC and the Bartlett IDNR-OWR Dam Safety, USACE, IDOT,
Park District DuDOT, KDSWCD, IEPA
• Securing easements from ComEd
and the Bartlett Park District
!J" l l'������fi�i/��,�rl r%Ii�r�tJi�(�f?6l�jV(11�orrarrr vrr rrriiu+�v ra»ii//,�Ja//IYrI>>/i �f� ,f)irl�f��u-rry>Jy�yn„ i l tf�, OFdJJi( �;��'�dy��OJ➢r Bier
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. I Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T. 847.823.05001 c. bbe],;,,a;Q m..
Watershed Plan
Preparation Mapping
r
Hydrologic/Hydraulic
Modeling
Permitting
�Ba,BNBBf��fff
2009 .....2013
V) R OJ u;;;;; C °.I I.....I I.. u;;;;: A l
Darren Olson, PE
Project Manager
Lee Fell, PE
Civil Design Lead
Emily Anderson, PE
Water Resources Engineer
Jedd Anderson, PWS
Wetland/Native
Planting Design
William Schultz, EI
Structural Engineer
Dave Dobson, PE
Resident Engineer
Cu.....11 ENT
Village of Bartlett
DuPage County Stormwater
CONS I[RUC "'II'"ION COS 11
$5.3 million
F:,EE
$350 thousand
F:°UNDIINC SOURCE
Local
un response t0 flooding in September 2008, CBBEU..... ��
and the uuu . citBartlett worked with Du � e ACEC
County ��t�.� rn t r, the )r st a r s ry District
of DuPage County my (FI1D C) and the Bartlett F:)ark l%ASCE
District trict t0eMo drainage improvements tOr
the Brewster Crash I....leadwat rs. a��)�9
A:1mn
atershed Plan was developed and approved in February 2010 that identified conveyance
provements and flood storage that would provide a 100 -year level of protection to 11 homes,
e state highway (IL 59), a County roadway (Stearns Road) and multiple roadways within the
Bartlett Estates Subdivision. The project included 4,000 LF of 15" diameter storm sewer in the Wayne
Grove Forest Preserve, 2,000 LF of 60" storm sewer under Stearns Road (600' to be tunneled under
the intersection of IL 59 and Stearns Road) and a 58 acre -ft flood storage basin/wetland and dam on
the Pratt's Wayne Woods Forest Preserve. The project was successfully constructed in 2013.
SERVICES INCLUDED:
• Watershed Plan preparation mapping • Site topographic survey and utility
• Unsteady HEC -RAS Hydrologic/ • Preparation of plans, specifications,
hydraulic modeling and bid documents
• Design coordination with the Village, • Permitting through DuPage County,
DuPage County, FPDDC and the Bartlett IDNR-OWR Dam Safety, USACE, IDOT,
Park District DuDOT, KDSWCD, IEPA
• Securing easements from ComEd
and the Bartlett Park District
!J" l l'������fi�i/��,�rl r%Ii�r�tJi�(�f?6l�jV(11�orrarrr vrr rrriiu+�v ra»ii//,�Ja//IYrI>>/i �f� ,f)irl�f��u-rry>Jy�yn„ i l tf�, OFdJJi( �;��'�dy��OJ➢r Bier
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. I Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T. 847.823.05001 c. bbe],;,,a;Q m..
F:1FROUECl lYF:) E I �he^mterseph0of �arHett Road and Amherst 11 )rIve
experienced frequent
Drainage ~ ���UO road�sures, ~
����^�0�W�^ � K�H `�� �wd^�, and res^den��U
��o�r�~
Hydrologic/Hydraulic
� ~~ drainage problem both a DuPa8e County roadway (Bartlett Food)
and
Modeling Village roadways and residences. Based on m drainage study completed by CBBEL, an
inter -governmental agreement was executed between the Village and DuPage County
Utility
tucost-share the funding for this project.
Permitting The OBBELdrainage study concluded that a3O"relief sewer from Bartlett Road hzCountry Creek would
provide a 1 00 -year level of protection for the adjacent roadways and residential structures. The proposed
Resident Engineer relief sewer iolocated inaCmmEdtransmission hght-of-way |naddition hmthe ComEdutility coordination,
Somi«o» the relief sewer also required lowering of gas and telephone lines and a Village watermain.
SERVICES INCLUDED:
����� �����
�� n� - �� n��
^ Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling
F)ROJEC 11 11 EAM ^ Development ofdrainage improvements
Darren Olson, PE
' ^ Preparation ofComEdEasement Documents
Water Resources
Project Manage/ ^ Utility coordination
Michael Burke, PE ^ Preparation ofdesign plans, specifications and bid documents
Water Resources Engineer
^ Permitting
Nick Morel, PE
Civil Design Engineer U.S.Army Corps ofEngineers
Martin Bojovio.PE DupagoCounty 8hmnnwaher
Resident Engineer DuPagoCounty DOT
CI UENT ^ Bidding services
Village ofBartlett ^ Resident engineer services
CONS 11 RUC 11 ION COS 11
$350 thousand
F:�EE
$62 thousand
F:�UNDING SOURCE
Local/County
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. I Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 60018 1 T. 847.823.0500 1c. b b e] cQ m..
YII)II:::
..m .
Flood Mitigation Plan
irnriC�j`t
Storm Sewer Improvements
Water Main Improvements
ufiu11ll11140611tl1101Y ufiu14
Floodwall
2012 2015
V:-)ROJu;;;;;C..II„ ..II°'u;;;;:AM
Christopher Burke, PhD, PE
Project Manager, QA/QC
Donald Dressel, PE
Project Engineer
Steve Sugg, PE
Design Engineer
Jeana Gowin, PE
Water Resources Engineer
Cu,,,,,ll ENT
Village of Elmwood Park
p,,, u;;;;;E
$50 thousand
!::: UNDIINC SOUIRCE
Local
Under the Village's ' I:::IOOd Mitigation Plan
prepared Icy CE.:::new storm sewers
were Ibeln installed at selected locations
withinthe VIlage 0f C;;:I WOOd Parke
0 n behalf of the Village of Elmwood
Park (Village), CBBEL developed a
comprehensive Flood Mitigation Plan
(FMP) for the historically flooded areas within the
Village. The street and basement flooding occurs
when the combined sewer system surcharges.
The existing combined sewers located on the
streets have inadequate capacity due to small
diameters and distance from the North Avenue
Interceptor sewer. The Westwood Subdivision
located in the northern portion of the Village and
the Palmer Street area located in the middle
portion of the Village historically drained to the
Des Plaines River Tributary (Tributary) that flows
north to south the Oak Park Country Club (OPCC).
The installation of combined sewers diverted the
stormwater runoff away from the Tributary.
The FMP was developed with the use the XP-
SWMM unsteady flow model which sized the new
storm sewer system, stormwater basin and pump
station. The design provides a 100 -year storm event
level of protection. The FMP includes installation of
new storm sewers in the Westwood Subdivision and
the area by Palmer Street. The existing combined
sewers will in the future only convey sanitary flow.
The FMP included the following components:
New storm sewers within the Westwood Creek
subdivision
• New truck sewer on 80th Avenue (twin 54"
RCP and 84" RCP)
New 84" RCP truck sewer from 80th Avenue
to the OPCC.
New 84" RCP and 3'X 12' RCBC through
OPCC into the new stormwater basin
New 14 acre-foot stormwater basin located at
the southeast corner of OPCC.
New 12" to 30" storm sewer from Palmer
Street area to basin.
New storm sewers on Country Club Lane and
Cortland Way to basin.
• A 150 cfs capacity pump station that dewaters
the basin through two 36" force mains to a
SAF energy dissipater located at the Des
Plaines River (DPR)
• A new 30" gravity pipe that conveys the low
flow from the Village areas to the DPR
The Tributary which flows north to south only
drains OPCC. A 30" gravity flow pipe drains the
Tributary low flow directly to the DPR. When 30"
gravity flow pipe exceeds its capacity, stormwater
runoff will be directed into the basin.
The final FMP component is a floodwall located
along the west side of Thatcher Road. This
floodwall prevents DPR floodwater from
inundating portions of the Village and the OPCC.
Funding from the MWRD was received that
partially funded the floodwall and pump station.
An unsteady DPR HEC -RAS hydraulic model
was used in conjunction with XP-SWMM model
to verify that the FMP would not result in adverse
hydraulic impacts to downstream and upstream
properties. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision
was obtained from FEMA for the floodwall. A
LOMB will be obtained once the project is
complete removing Village areas current located
in the DPR floodplain. The
project began construction in
2013 and was completed in 00000
2015. „n mmmm
Christopher B. Burke Engineering, Ltd. 19575 W. Higgins Rd. ( Ste. 600 1 Rosemont, IL 600181 T: 847.823.0500 J .c be.l,,;,c,Q,m,
111"11110111:11:11:11C III"" III IIG IRS II"" III 11[)1111 III
III::` IROJ 111:11:11:11C III A III::,' 11::`11ROAC11I°°I
0 BJ 111" ' T IIP II[III III::` II[III IIP°°� II[III IIP IIII II[III
IR-1IIR J 1:..:i C "'UI"' U N D IE IR S TA IIN IID II IN C
On behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect (Village),
CBBEL completed the Levee 37 Drainage Study to analyze
a number of concept improvements within the Levee 37
interior area using the XP-SWMM 2-dimensional hydrologic
and hydraulic model, and developed associated opinions of
probable construction cost. During the study, Village staff
selected the 10 -year storm event as the level of protection
to pursue for this interior area. The proposed improvements
recommended in the 2015 Levee 37 Drainage Study report
consists of solely pump station upgrades, or pump station
upgrades with either stormwater storage and/or conveyance
improvements. The pump station upgrades are all located
adjacent to existing Levee 37 Pump Stations No.1 and No.2,
while the stormwater storage improvements are proposed
to be located within school district property, specifically
School Districts 21 and 26, and the River Trails Park
District property. Each component can be implemented
independently, as they require coordination with different
stakeholders, and can function and provide an increased
level of protection as stand-alone projects. All pump station
and ancillary improvements are being coordinated between
the Village and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
and are not part of this proposal as stated in the RFP.
CBBEL also completed a continuing effortto the September
2015 Levee 37 Drainage Study, which culminated in a May
25, 2016 memorandum to the Director of Public Works and a
June 14, 2016 presentation to the Village Board. These next
steps were labeled as Phase 1A, and included meetings with
the USACE, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources —
Office of Water Resources (IDNR-OWR), School Districts 21
and 26, and the River Trails Park District. An investigation
into individual flood -proofing projects for the affected
properties was also performed, and the use of a vacant
property at the southwest corner of River and Camp
McDonald Roads for the creation of additional storage was
included. The latter vacant property is not part of the work
proposed by the Village in this RFP.
Since the meetings with the agencies/stakeholders, it is our
understanding that Village staff have been in continuous
conversations with the USACE and IDNR-OWR regarding
funding forthe upgrade of the existing pump stations to add
more discharge capacity into the Des Plaines River. Due to
the State's budgetary limitations, the ability of IDNR-OWR
to serve as a funding source for the pump station may be
limited. The USACE has indicated that they are continuing
to proceed with the Village's request to upgrade the pump
stations, and are performing the necessary steps to obtain
funding through their agency's program.
The Village has decided to initiate the design process
for the interior or landside drainage improvements. This
process will require significant upfront coordination with
the affected schools and park district to determine the
feasibility and extent of the improvements that can occur
within their respective properties. It is this work that is being
pursued through this RFP.
VII LACI VAI:: IVC)UI`d I IYC)SPI C..I.. I I VI''I ;/ L /\N 1)SIDL IMI..R/, IVI''IMI I"i Is CIIPH L
l:-1Ilf J Ilf;; "I A P IP IR 0 A C Fi
The proposed approach would be to divide the project
into a preliminary phase and a design/permitting phase.
The preliminary phase would consist of meeting with the
stakeholders and establishing an agreeable footprint and
plan for each site. Subsequently, the engineering plans and
specifications and permitting can be prepared for each site.
The following steps are recommended as part of the
preliminary phase:
• Conduct field visits with Village and School/Park
District staff to define a "least -impact" footprint of
the stormwater storage facilities within the school
property, and to determine if these entities require
amenities.
• Follow-up meetings with the School Districts and
Park District (park located adjacent to one of the
following schools) to discuss the project.
• Prepare conceptual exhibits and renderings of the
stormwater storage facility and requested amenities
to facilitate public discussion.
• Additional field survey and hydraulic modeling will be
necessary as part of the discussion process with the
stakeholders mentioned above.
CBBEL anticipates that the meetings with the school
and park districts will require significant effort. Initially
the concept plans will be prepared for their staff review,
which will then require their respective Board reviews and
approvals. It is envisioned that concept renderings will be
required as part of the process. A report/memorandum
will be prepared defining a refined recommended project
that will ensue after performing the above steps, and likely
represent a reasonable compromise of the Village's desire
I::' E1,,,,II IIS II INA: Y 1,1,,,,IIAS E
i..�s, lc.............:::::::......Si.l:......�.i.�.i.::�:...1 .......I:).r, ye�:k: Arerss wuk:h Si:a:skehcr9c:�ers:
Village and CBBEL staff will visit the school/park
district sites with their respective staffs to assess how
the stormwater storage facilities can best fit into the
two (2) school properties, and to obtain feedback and
constraints from their staff. The site visit will also help
identify any additional specific survey needs that will
assist in evaluating the project. This task assumes two (2)
independent meetings, one for each site and respective
owner representatives.
CBBEL suggests using the survey information from
the 2015 study to develop the concept drawings. The
field survey task for detailed topography at the sites is
suggested at a later point in the project, once concept
buy -in from the stakeholders has been achieved.
to alleviate flooding within the interior area of the levee
and the constraints imposed by the school/park district
property limitations. The report will be the basis for the
design phase work. Once the respective Boards approve
the concept developed during the preliminary phase, the
Village can then proceed with the design and permitting of
the two sites.
Ideally, the improvements at both sites should be permitted
and bid as one project, however it cannot be known a
priori whether both schools and park district will allow
the improvements. As such, the scope and fees will be
separated by site, further noting that it is also possible that
funding may not be available for improving the two sites
concurrently. During the preliminary phase it is anticipated
that both sites will be investigated and each task reflects the
combined effort for that phase. If during the preliminary
phase and following Village Board direction it is determined
that both sites will be designed, permitted and bid jointly, it
is expected that corresponding savings can occur.
Task ::-�aEcep.refi� ernent M:ro.�1MoIUing_ It is
:................,,. ... ....... . ...
anticipated that some of the stakeholders will request the
refinement of alternatives as presented in the September
2015 Levee 37 Drainage Study. For example, the depth
and footprint of the proposed stormwater storage
facilities will likely be the main discussion points during
the meetings with the schools' administrative staff. Their
staff will likely want an exhibit of a deep, smaller footprint
facility vs. a shallow, larger footprint. This will require
modifying and executing the associated simulations to
verify their feasibility from a hydraulics perspective.
1"'bask 1 ...... V"oI1ow°°lk ee.i:Ur1Us_wV"i:h S ciko�Y� �,,,�V„n"%:rVc'%:fin
;and Park District &rrflnist:ration: This task will include
preparing for and attending two (2) meetings, one with
each school's staff. This task will also include preparing
exhibits and renderings of what the stormwater storage
facilities may look like, up to two (2) different footprints
(1 shallow and 1 deep), and renderings of requested
VII LACI VAI:: IM0UI`d I IYC)SPI C..I.. I I VI''I ;/ L /\N 1)SIDL IMI..R/, IVl''IMI I11i Is C:I"IPH L
amenities that can beincluded inthe project. This task will
develop plan view concepts for each facility and graphic
illustrations, and will bebased ondiscussions and feedback
received during the site visits held aspart ofTask 1above.
.E. s Li r..n a Le CBBEL will prepare a concept -level drawing of
the proposed refined recommended project that evolves
from performing the prior tasks. An engineer's estimate
of probable construction cost will also be prepared.
The preliminary cost estimates will include the design'
permitting, and construction costs ofeach project.
The results ofthe follow-up
analysis will be summarized in a peport/nemoran6umthat
will include an executive summary, a description of the
analysis, established criteria and permitting requirements,
and alternative analysis. An engineer's estimate of
probable construction cost will be prepared to reflect an
alternative where the storage proposed within the school/
park properties isprovided underground. The preliminary
coat estimates will include the design, permitting, and
construction costs of each project. The report will contain
a section describing an implementation plan which will
consist of project costs, benefits, estimated time frame to
implement, and impact tothe neighborhood.
Meetings (beyond those specifically identified on another
task) and project coordination will benecessary during the
analysis process. The estimated fee reflects costs for:
0 Three (3) coordination meetings with Village staff
0 Project management and coordination
The meetings inthis task are separate from any meetings
described under other tasks.
CBBEL staff will
present the findings ataVillage Board meeting. CBBEL will
create a Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation that details our
findings from the preliminary phase. The budget reflects
staff time for one presentation.
CBBEL staff will present the findings ata public meeting.
CBBEL use the Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation from
the prior task. The budget reflects staff time for one public
meeting.
I::::UE I DE0RVEY
l"ask 8A Frost Ejernentary CBBEL will
complete a survey of Frost Elementary School project area
encompassing anapproximate area of8acres and 1,6OOLF
of roadway. CBBEL will perform the following survey tasks:
Horizontal Control: Utilizing state plane coordinates
CBBEL will set recoverable primary control
utilizing |L. EAST S.P.C. NAD 83 horizontal datum.
° Vertical Control: CBBEL will perform a level circuit
throughout the entire length ofthe project establishing
benchmarks and assigning elevations tothe horizontal
control points. The elevations will be based on NAVID
°
Topographic Survey: CBBEL will field locate all
pavements driveways, curb and gutters, signs,
manholes, utility vaults, drainage structures, driveway
°
Cross -Sections: CBBEL will survey cross-sections of
the roadway at 50' intervals extending 25' from edge
of existing pavement for approximately 1.600 LF of
roadway. CBBEL will also survey cross-sections at all
driveways and other grade controlling features.
*
Utility Survey: CBBEL will survey all above ground
utilities induding, but not limited to: water, sanitary
sewer, storm sewer, telephone, electric, cable and gas,
etc. Identify size, type, rim, and invert elevations.
° Tree Survey: CBBEL will locate all trees over inches
in diameter within twenty feet of the proposed
improvements.
~ Research atthe Cook County Recorder's Office.
* Field reconnaissance and survey to locate existing
monumentation and boundary evidence.
* Analyze Record and Field Data necessary to compute
approximate Right-of4Naythroughout project limits.
° Office calculations and plotting offield and record data.
° [}rafting ofexisting conditions Plan atascale of1^=2O'
CBBEL will also obtain utility information from all known
utility companies along the project corridor and include
the utility information inthe existing conditions base sheets
developed from the above information. The base sheets
will be drafted atascale of1^=2O'
VHLLAGEOFMOUNTPROSPE[T LEYEE37LANDS|DE|MPROVEMENTs [88EL
CBBEL will coordinate with utility owners and with JULIE
Utility Coordination to retrieve atlas information for all
applicable underground utilities including water main'
gas, electric, cable, etc. CBBEL will compile all Utility
Atlas information into the base map. Locations of existing
utilities /obstructions / systems shown on the base map
are the compilation of available utility plans provided by
utility owners and JULIE Utility Coordination. All utilities /
obstructions / systems may not beshown. Contractor shall
beresponsible for locating and protecting all underground
utilities /obstructions / systems whether or not shown on
base map.
C8BB-
wiU complete a survey ofIndian Grove Elementary School
project area encompassing anapproximate area ot5acres
and 900 LF of roadvvay. CBBEL will perform the following
survey tasks:
�
Horizontal Control: Utilizing state plane coordinates,
CBBEL will set recoverable primary control utilizing |L
EAST S.PC.NAD 83horizontal datum.
°
Vertical Control: CBBEL will perform a level circuit
throughout the entire length ofthe project establishing
benchmarks and assigning elevations tothe horizontal
control points. The elevations will be based on NAV[)
'88 to coincide with previously completed projects.
° Topographic Survey: CBBEL will field locate all
pavements, drivevvays, curb and gutters' signs,
manho|es, utility vaults, drainage structures, driveway
°
Cross -Sections: CBBEL will survey cross-sections of
the roadway at5O' intervals extending 25' from edge
of existing pavement for approximately 900 LF of
roadway. CBBEL will also survey cross-sections at all
driveways and other grade controlling features.
°
Utility Survey: CBBEL will survey all above ground
utilities inc|uding, but not limited to: water, sanitary
sewer, storm sewer, telephone, electric, cable and gas,
°
Tree Survey: CBBEL will locate all trees over inches
in diameter within twenty feet of the proposed
improvements.
°
Field reconnaissance and survey to locate existing
monumentation and boundary evidence.
CBBEL will also obtain utility information from all known
utility companies along the project corridor and include
the utility information in the existing conditions base
sheets developed from the above information. The base
sheets will be drafted atascale of1^=2O'
CBBEL will coordinate with utility owners and with
JULIE Utility Coordination to retrieve atlas information for
all applicable underground utilities including water main,
gas, electric, cable, etc. CBBEL will compile all Utility
Atlas information into the base map. Locations of existing
utilities /obstructions / systems shown on the base map
are the compilation of available utility plans provided by
utility owners and JULIE Utility Coordination. All utilities /
obstructions /systems may not be shown. ContractorshaU
beresponsible for locating and protecting all underground
utilities /obstructions / systems whether or not shown on
base map.
WETLANDASSESSMENT
The following services for awetland assessment and report
are proposed to comply with Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act and Cook County Watershed Management
Ordinance.
Task 10 -- WetIand FieId Reconnaissance: An investigation
------------------
of the project site will be completed to delineate the limits
of wetlands and waters of the United States present. The
delineation will be completed based on the methodology
established by the U5ACE. Also during the site visit,
wildlife and plant community qualities will be assessed.
The limits of the wetland community will be field staked
so that they can be professionally surveyed by others
in relation to the project coordinate system. We also
will locate the delineated boundaries using a submeter
accuracy handheld GPS unit.
The resuIts ofthe field
reconnaissance will besummarized inaletter report. The
wetlands' generalized quality ratings, according to the
Swink and Wilhelm K4etho6o|ogy(1994), will be included
along with exhibits depicting the approximate wetland
and project boundaries, National Wetland Inventory, Soil
Survey, floodplain, U3GS topography, site photographs
and their locations, and the USACE Roudne[)n'3ite Data
Forms. |fthe delineation isfield surveyed, that will beused
as our base wetland boundary map, otherwise wewill use
the best available aerial photograph.
Frost Elementary School
• Analyze Record and Field Data necessary to compute
On the
approximate Right -of -Way throughout . basis of the preliminary phase report, CBBEL will prepare
Fi contract s t i r
• {}MGceca|cu|a�onsand plottingofkPre-Final con rac field record prepared n accordance with
Village and |D{}Tdesign criteria. This submittal will consist
° Drafting ofexisting conditions Plan atascale of1"=20' ofplans, specifications, estimate oftime, status ofutilities
to be adjusted, and an estimate of construction cost.
CBBEL will use | DOT standard pay items and specifications
V�LLAGEOF�MOUNTPROS PE[T LEYEE37LANDS|DE|MPROVE�MENTS [88EL
to the extent possible; project -specific special provisions
will bewritten asneeded.
C88ELwill provide this submittal tothe Village for review.
C88EL will also provide this submittal to affected utility
companies. These plans will be used for the permitting
submittals.
No. of
Sheets Sheet Description
1 Cover Sheet
2 General Notes
1 Summary ofQuantities
1 Overview/Alignment/Ties/Benchmarks
(1^~100')
2 Typical Sections
5 Existing Conditions and Removal Plan
(1"=20')
2 Proposed Site Grading
3 Proposed Plan O"=2O'>
4 Drainage and Utility Plan O"=2O'>
4 Landscape Plan (1'=20")
1 ADA Ramp Details
5 Maintenance of Traffic Sheets
5 Sediment/Erosion Control Plans O^~2O1
4 Sediment/EroxionContro| Notes/Details/
Standards
4 Construction Details
8 Construction Standards
10 Cross Sections
62 Total Sheets
Upon receiving
\6Uage, owner and permit/review agencies comments on
the Pre -Final submittal, CBBEL will finalize the Pre -Final
contract documents and cost estimate. During this task
the letting date will be determined and an estimated
construction schedule will be provided. A disposition
letter addressing all comments will beincluded. C88ELwiU
provide this final submittal tothe Village and stakeholders
for final review.
['ask 12C Bicl Set Submittal ittA� CBBB-
wiU make the final revisions tothe final submittal based
on Village and stakeholders final review comments, utility
company feedback, and agencies comments. C88ELwiU
provide this submittal tothe Village for use in bidding the
project. C88ELvvi|| also provide this submittal to affected
utility companies.
Indian Grove Elementary School
On the
basis of the preliminary phase report, [BBEL will prepare
Pre -Final contract documents prepared in accordance with
Village and |D[}Tdesign criteria. This submittal will consist
of p|ens, speciGcetiona, estimate of time, status of utilities
to be adjusted, and an estimate of construction cost.
CBBELwill use | DOT standard pay items and specifications
to the extent possible; project -specific special provisions
will bewritten asneeded.
CBBELwill provide this submittal tothe Village for review.
CBBELwiU also provide this submittal to affected utility
companies. These plans will be used for the permitting
submittals.
No. of
Sheets Sheet Description
1 Cover Sheet
2 General Notes
1 Summary of Quantities
1 Overview/Alignment/Ties/Benchmarks
(1^~100')
2 Typical Sections
5 Existing Conditions and Removal Plan
(1^~20')
2 Proposed Site Grading
3 Proposed Plan (1"=2O')
4 Drainage and Utility Plan (1"~2O')
4 Landscape Plan (1'~2O")
1 ADA Ramp Details
5 Maintenance of Traffic Sheets
5 Seclimont/Ero,ionControl Plans <1^~2O')
4 Sodimont/ErosionContro| Notes/Details/
Standards
4 Construction Details
8 Construction Standards
10 Cross Sections
62 Total Sheets
Upon receiving
Village, owner and permit/review agencies comments on
the Pre -Final submittal, CBBELwiU finalize the Pre -Final
contract documents and cost estimate. During this task
the letting date will be determined and an estimated
construction schedule will be provided. A disposition
letter addressing all comments will beincluded. C88ELwill
provide this final submittal tothe Village and stakeholders
for final review.
C88EL
will make the final revisions to the final submittal based
onVillage and stakeholders final review comments, utility
company fee6back, and agencies comments. C88ELvvi||
provide this submittal tothe Village for use in bidding the
project. CBBELwill also provide this submittal toaffected
utility companies.
A
geotechnical investigation will be performed byCBBEUs
suboonsu|tant, Testing Service Corporation (TSC). The
geotechnical investigation will include soil borings at
select locations to determine the condition of oubgrade
materials, specifically, if there are poor soil conditions.
TSC has assumed that the site is accessible totheir drilling
V�LLA GEOF�MOUNTPROSPE[T LEYEE37LANDS|DE|MPR OVEM EN TS [88EL
equipment. This proposal does not include provision for
tree/brush or other obstruction removal to access bore hole
locations, should access be impeded.
TSC proposes performing 6 borings to a depth of 15 feet
below existing grade within the detention basin footprints
identified in the Alternatives 3 and 6 exhibits. Total drilling
footage is estimated to be 90 lineal feet. TSC will make
recommendations for the proposed basin regarding
groundwater management, stability, and soil remediation.
Furthermore, TSC will perform CCDD analytical testing of 2
samples to determine the suitability of the haul -off material
in relation to IEPA form 663.
TSC signing Form LPC -663 is contingent upon all
constituents meeting their respective MACs. If
any constituent exceeds the MACs, the Licensed
Professional Engineer will not be able to certify the soil as
uncontaminated. In that event, additional analysis may be
required in connection with disposal at a Subtitle D landfill,
at additional cost for consulting, analytical testing and
completion of the waste profile.
n..a,s1<..............1..4.B............:::::........._G..e..r:�:t, chni,c �:�.l............. ,,r ka,V„ysus._._...m:m: hidi_an .Grove
V lernen ar A geotechnical investigation will be performed
by CBBEUs subconsultant, Testing Service Corporation
(TSC). The geotechnical investigation will include soil
borings at select locations to determine the condition
of subgrade materials, specifically, if there are poor soil
conditions. TSC has assumed that the site is accessible to
their drilling equipment. This proposal does not include
provision for tree/brush or other obstruction removal to
access bore hole locations, should access be impeded.
TSC proposes performing 5 borings to a depth of 15 feet
below existing grade within the detention basin footprints
identified in the Alternatives 3 and 6 exhibits. Total drilling
footage is estimated to be 75 lineal feet. TSC will make
recommendations for the proposed basin regarding
groundwater management, stability, and soil remediation.
Furthermore, TSC will perform CCDD analytical testing of 2
samples to determine the suitability of the haul -off material
in relation to IEPA form 663.
TSC signing Form LPC -663 is contingent upon all
constituents meeting their respective MACs. If
any constituent exceeds the MACs, the Licensed
Professional Engineer will not be able to certify the soil as
uncontaminated. In that event, additional analysis may be
required in connection with disposal at a Subtitle D landfill,
at additional cost for consulting, analytical testing and
completion of the waste profile.
1::1 IE IRS IM 11 "'ll ”""II"' II IAV G
['ask 15 ..... .......................... .....................r .......igrislckional Determination:. . If
..................................................................................
a wetland is determined to be present, CBBEL staff
will prepare and submit a request for a Jurisdictional
Determination to the IJSACE.
"V"'ask 16 .. Mek:ror.)oVik:an Water V ecV sr uak:ion V::7isk:rick:
(. YYR. ) Wef,�,"racl__-__.S"u"bmik:k:ak If necessary, CBBEL
Environmental Resources Staff will assist the project
engineer in preparation of the wetland, waters and
buffer portions of the Watershed Management Permit
Application. This information will include the required
exhibits, specifications, data and project information.
V"'ask 17 -_ WeHand Review A.ens.y Coo�on iiV
necessary). Before and during the permit review process,
we expect to have meetings with the regulatory agencies,
project engineer, and client. We also expect to have to
prepare responses to comments received during the
review process. We have budgeted for attendance at two
meetings and include budget to cover the cost of submittal
of two responses to comments. If additional meetings, or
responses to comments, are required they will be billed on
a time and materials basis.
m11...�...�.�.......�........::::......p:... ?..�..........::::I. �: rau ..w.k.:.. CBBEL will update the
modeling and the preliminary phase to reflect the final
design plans, and revise the addendum report accordingly.
"V"'r: sk 19: MWV: �V::. Pern'flt SUbn"fl'ttak An MWRD Watershed
Management Permit (WMP) will be required. In support of
g q pp
WMP, the following items will be prepared and submitted
to MWRD in this task:
• WMO Schedule A
• WMO Schedule B
• WMO Schedule C
• WMO Schedule D -Legacy (For modifications to the
MWRD permitted detention facility)
• WMO Schedule P (Soil Erosion and Sediment Control)
• WMO Schedule W (Wetland impacts) - Task 16
• Summary cover letter
• Signed and sealed engineering plans
CBBEL will create the WMO Permit Application package for
submittal to MWRD based on the information generated in
the previous tasks and supplied to us as previously noted.
Since this is a project undertaken by a municipality for the
benefit of the public, it is assumed that no permit review fee
will be required as part of this submittal.
The Village will be responsible for the MWRD review fee.
VII LMVI 0I:: IV0UI`d I IY C..I.. I I VI''I ;/ L /\N 1)SIDL IMI' R/, IVI''IMI I"i Is C:IIPH L
AMINVIRM
i..��....<........:�"........:::::::...... oo �::.li..�!.�;�ti .�!.........I::..............::�;.........e.?"........V;�, ,�b,our� ....... c�encues:
CBBEL will coordinate with the following agencies, as
required for USACE and Cook County reviews. CBBEL will
coordinate with Illinois Department of Natural Resources
(IDNR) — Historic Preservation Agency, IDNR -Threatened
and Endangered Species and US Fish and Wildlife Service
regarding the Federal Endangered Species Act.
sl< 21 ..... Nor k: Cook .. �oii .anr::i Wa:...er .Conserv..ak.ion
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
V;;.7i, ;;k;,w ict;;,,,,,,,,,,(��,VVC V;;;7); If required by a stakeholder review
agency CBBEL will prepare and submit an application
for the SWCD to complete a soil erosion and sediment
control review of the project plans. We have budgeted for
preparation of one response to comments.
Task 22 lElI::1A NV:IV::.7i:: S Construction Permit. CBBEL will
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
for the project in accordance with Part IV of the NPDES
ILR10 General Permit. Please note the completion of this
task will require input from the project engineer and signed
certification statements from all contractors, subcontractors,
and the operator as identified in the SWPPP. This task also
covers the submittal of an electronic copy of the SWPPP to
the IEPA, one site visit, and a review of the soil erosion and
sediment control plan.
..n..�:?...<......:�".....:::::::...1 .i.:l:�...r!.�9..........�... a, a.. i :u .r!.*� t ,p. �tn�m._uurg CBBEL
will make recommendations for obtaining third -party
financial assistance, and if pursued, will assist the Village in
preparing the necessary applications.
............................ " ::i?,"cjiationrc�yeetinciMeetings
.:.....:. ._..:....,,
beyond those specifically identified on another task,
and project coordination will be necessary during the
preliminary phase and design process. The estimated fee
reflects costs for:
• Three (3) coordination meetings with Village staff
• Project management and coordination
The meetings in this task are separate from any meetings
described under other tasks.
Assumptions
The following assumptions have been made to estimate
the budget for the proposed scope of work:
No sanitary sewer main or water main relocation
work will be necessary. Adjustments to services is
anticipated. No IEPA - Water or IEPA Sanitary permit
required.
2. No pump station analysis or design.
3. No IDNR-OWR floodway construction permit.
4. No structural engineering design.
5. Landscape restoration limited to installation of turf and
tree replacement on a tree -per tree ratio (for quality
trees with diameter of 6" and greater). No playground
restoration or equipment relocation or new equipment.
6. No PESA required.
7. All review/application fees will be paid by the Village.
8. Plans for amenities to be prepared by the schools or
park district separately.
Anticipated Future Tasks not included in the RFP:
Plat Of Easement: A temporary construction easement
and a plat of easement for the proposed basin and storm
sewer route will be prepared within the common standards
of practices in the state of Illinois. The Plat of Easement
does not include obtaining the legal(s) for the property or
a title search, or obtaining signatures, or recordation of the
plat. The easement provisions that are provided by the
client will be used. It is assumed that the title search and
appraisals as part of the land acquisition processwill be initiated
and performed entirely by Village staff, including retaining
an appraiser, reviewing the appraisals, and negotiations with
the property owner. This task would include:
1. Initial coordination with Client.
2. Research at the Cook County Recorder's Office.
3. Office calculations and plotting of field and record data.
4. CAD drafting of the permanent drainage & pond
maintenance easement plat for the proposed easement
areas.
5. Write legal descriptions for the proposed easement areas.
6. Final review and submittal by an Illinois Professional
Land Surveyor.
Ti IEE IIR Il i S N Ilf) C O IN Ilf) II "'III"' II O IN
We will bill you at the hourly rates specified on the cost
proposed and will establish our contract in accordance with
the Village's engineering services agreement provided to
us, both of which are expressly incorporated into and are an
integral part of this contract for Professional Engineering
Services. The Scope of Services described previously and
related Estimated Fee are based on information known to
date. It shall be understood that CBBEL shall be allowed
the opportunity to adjust the Estimated Fee as additional
information about this project is obtained and/or our level
of participation increases beyond that for which we have
budgeted. Direct costs for blueprints, photocopying,
mailing, overnight delivery, messenger services, mileage
and report compilation are estimated in the Estimated
Fee. It should be emphasized that any engineering services
performed for tasks not included in the proposal and/or
beyond customary efforts as well as for any additional
meetings shall be billed on a time and material basis.
VII LACI 0I:: IV0UI`d I "'f C..I.. I I VI''I ;/ L /\N 1)SIDL IMI..R/,. VI''IMI I11i I S CIIPH L
lf-'IR: IIR-' 0 S 11:..:111' 1R1 RR0 J E C ">n"' S C I11 --i IIE.' IID U Ill„ III...
RECEIVE PROPOSALS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
AWARD CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
ISSUE NOTICE TO PROCEED FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
PRE—FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DUE
FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DUE
PIIR IlRi;ie S I IN III"' R K ll,,.0 A ICS
S l::::l>..I...1:::: 1:: 1::::1 191 201 '7
ie ( 0 .::::.� 3, 2(..)17
Ce ( 0.::::.�4, `......
)17
MARCl V 6, 2018
APRIL 3, 2018
Our project team's key personnel described in this proposal are available immediately and are located within the Chicagoland
area to undertake the responsibilities for this project. Our current work commitments will allow us to undertake this project on
an immediate basis. Similarly, we have been informed by our subconsultant that they can and look forward to handling the work
associated with this project on an immediate basis. Our goal is to create a seamless environment between the Village and our
proposed project team while delivering a quality, on-time project.
ESTIMATE OF PROJECT HOURS AND FEES
Levee 37 Landside Storm Sewer Improvements
.
I'aak i7oeu7pb
N.&i%n. 3s i . � - I I -----I
1P1,-yal E!n9Vl (.',,V E""lV f'ng 111 &,",I �d-P,, FrnV Cn IV Eraul
$867/1, 984211, $f.11Rlr WlrC r SY4(1rr R11GM $1.M" SMA, slrfolr X128411
S"." ;r",.,Iv ."t,—"t hurvaV 11 buivnY/ (AI)� 0,011
MrinuEll^r
$Il!NNr s9wi, $14CNr
M11,11.
!
,5F)&Alr
bN
nnul(anY
Yt
Wnllra
........
C.11,11.11
Y"xn