Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8.3 Dowtown Transportation Study5/11/2017 BoardDocs® Pro IN Agenda Item Details Meeting Apr 18, 2017 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE VILLAGE BOARD - 7:00 p.m. Category 8. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Subject 8.3 Motion to accept proposal for Downtown Transportation Study in an amount not to exceed $49,200 Access Public Type Action Preferred Date Apr 18, 2017 Absolute Date Apr 18, 2017 Dollar Amount 49,200.00 Budgeted Yes Budget Source General Fund Recommended Accept the proposal from Sam Schwartz Consulting LLC for the Downtown Transportation Study in Action an amount not to exceed $49,200. Public Content Information A key component of the Mount Prospect Strategic Plan is to partner with appropriate government agencies to resolve troublesome intersection issues. Last year the Village commissioned a report that began to look at opportunities to reduce congestion, improve mobility, and enhance safety in the downtown. One key accomplishment was reviewing and modifying the traffic signal timing programs to better reflect today's conditions. The changes, made with the partnership of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), have improved traffic flow and reduced delays. At the direction of the Village Board of Trustees, the Village desires to build upon that report to complete four additional tasks with a new study in 2017. This new study will require collaboration with IDOT, Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC), Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), and Metra. • Train Station Location Analysis The primary delay to traffic on IL Route 83 in downtown Mount Prospect is caused by stopped trains at the train station blocking the roadway. A detailed analysis will be performed to review the current train station location and to examine possible new locations for the train station and the implications on adjacent crossings. • Additional Road Crossing at Railroad Tracks The downtown has two at -grade road crossings across the railroad tracks, IL Route 83 and Emerson Street. The limited number of crossings can cause congestion at peak travel times of the day, especially for local residents. An additional crossing may alleviate traffic delays to the benefit of the community. A detailed analysis will be performed to identify one or two potential intersections to provide a new crossing (at -grade or separated) and the implications on adjacent crossings and properties. • Traffic Impact Study with Redevelopment at Prospect Avenue & Maple Street The Village is considering redeveloping the south side of Prospect Avenue between Maple Street and School Street to create new housing and commercial developments. This will only add to the need for an efficient roadway network. A detailed analysis will be performed to determine the potential impact a new development would have on the surrounding roadway network. The potential new development will also be taken into account when examining the train station location and additional crossing. hftps://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 1/3 5/11/2017 BoardDocs® Pro • Separated Pedestrian Push Buttons at Downtown Intersections Pedestrian signals and crosswalks exist at the three signalized intersections adjacent to the train station: IL Route 83 & Northwest Hwy, IL Route 83 & Prospect Avenue, and Northwest Hwy & Emerson Street. However, each corner has a single pedestrian push button that puts a call into two directions. A single press of the button will provide a Walk signal during one phase (e.g. north -south) and then another Walk signal with the next phase (e.g. east -west) even though the pedestrian only made one crossing. This leads to inefficiencies to the traffic signal timing and can result in vehicle delays. A detailed analysis will be performed to determine if the push buttons can be separated, design requirements, and the effect on traffic operations. Village staff is seeking at this time to enter into a contract with a consulting firm for preliminary design engineering services. The study is expected to be completed this summer. Staff requested proposals from six (6) engineering consulting firms to provide preliminary design engineering services for the downtown transportation study. A copy of the request for proposals is enclosed. Each firm was asked to submit as part of their proposal the following information: 1. Resumes of key personal and related experience on similar type projects 2. Summary of the firm's approach to the project 3. Staff hour estimate and cost proposal for major phases of work 4. Project schedule The Village received three (3) submissions; firms that chose not to respond cited the complexity of the tasks related to the train station location and additional crossing. The three consulting firms' Statement of Qualifications and Proposal were reviewed on the basis of their understanding of our goals and their methodology to complete the study. Each firm was also interviewed by Village staff. They were then rated (with a maximum score of 100 points) according to these specific categories: background of firm, capacity to perform work, understanding of the project, related project experience, project schedule, and work effort. The rankings are as follows: Table 1 Category Sam Schwartz Ciorba Group HLR Background of firm (Max 15 points) 14 13 12 Capacity to perform work (Max 15 points) 15 14 13 Understanding of the project (Max 20 points) 120 $47,036 18 15 Related project experience (Max 20 points) 20 17 14 Project schedule (Max 10 points) 10 10 10 Work effort (manhours & cost) (Max 20 points) 20 12 18 Total Points: 99 84 82 The highest rated firm was Sam Schwartz Consulting LLC of Chicago, Illinois (Sam Schwartz). Sam Schwartz has put together a very strong project team with experience working with railroad agencies including UPRR, Metra, and ICC. They also have a strong knowledge of the interconnectivity between railroad and traffic signal operations. In addition, they have a unique understanding of relevant roadway systems as they recently completed the traffic signal timing modifications in the downtown for the Village and IDOT. These attributes distinguish Sam Schwartz as the best qualified consultant for this proposed project. Cost proposals were also requested from all the consultants. Analysis of cost proposals is summarized in Table 2 below: Table 2 Firm Cost Proposal Hours Cost/ Hour Sam Schwartz $49,200 381 $124 Ciorba Group $136,170 1,059 $117 HLR Engineering $47,036 341 $127 hftps://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 2/3 5/11/2017 BoardDocs® Pro Staff estimated 400 hours to complete the study at an approximate cost of $50,000.00 ($125 per hour). The lowest cost proposal was submitted by Hampton, Lenzini, & Renwick Engineering, Inc. (HLR) of Elgin, Illinois. As previously indicated, it is the opinion of staff that Sam Schwartz submitted a more qualitative proposal. Furthermore, the cost difference between these two (2) lowest cost submittals (HLR and Sam Schwartz) is only 4.6% ($2,164). Staff finds that Sam Schwartz' work effort is reasonable for the scope of work proposed (381) and their average hourly rate ($124) is competitive. Alternatives 1. Accept proposal from Sam Schwartz Consulting, LLC for Downtown Transportation Study. 2. Action at discretion of Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Village Board accept the proposal from Sam Schwartz Consulting, LLC for the Downtown Transportation Study in an amount not to exceed $49,200. RSQ.pdf (882 KB) sam schwartz proposal.pdf (1,125 KB) Administrative Content Executive Content Motion & Voting Accept the proposal from Sam Schwartz Consulting LLC for the Downtown Transportation Study in an amount not to exceed $49,200. Motion by Steve Polit, second by John Matuszak. Final Resolution: Motion Carries Yea: Paul Hoefert, John Matuszak, Steve Polit, Richard Rogers, Colleen Saccotelli, Michael Zadel hftps://www.boarddocs.com/il/vomp/Board.nsf/Private?open&login 3/3 Director Sean P. Dorsey Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Request for Statement of Qualifications DATE: February 6, 2017 TO: Ciorba Group, Inc. HLR Engineering, Inc. Gewalt-Hamilton Associates Sam Schwartz Engineering Bollinger, Lach and Associates Civiltech Engineering FROM: Jeffrey Wulbecker, P.E. Village of Mount Prospect Public Works Department RE: Request for Statements of Qualifications Downtown Transportation Study Deputy Director Jason H. Leib Your firm is invited to submit a Statement of Qualifications to become eligible for a possible interview for Phase I Engineering services for multi -mode transportation improvements in downtown Mount Prospect. Attached to this memo are: 1. A list of materials and information that should be included with your Statement of Qualifications (Exhibit A). 2. A general definition of the scope of work and a schedule of dates and requirements for the selection process (Exhibit B). 3. An aerial map identifying the project limits (Exhibit C). Your letter and Statement of Qualifications (two hard copies and one electronic copy) should be forwarded to the following address and received no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, February 24, 2017. Mr. Jeffrey Wulbecker, P.E. Village Engineer Village of Mount Prospect 1700 W. Central Road Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 jwulbeck@mountprospect.org Phone &�:ir/8 70-564 0 81 VV�WW.r.r.OUrfll)R)SrJOCtUR) Exhibit A Requirements for Statement of Qualifications Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Downtown Transportation Study Location: Roadway, Railroad & Pedestrian Systems around the Mount Prospect Train Station Your Statement of Qualifications should include the following information: 1. Name, address and brief history of firm. 2. Organizational chart and resumes of key personnel to be assigned to this project. 3. Related experience during the last five (5) years. For example: a. Phase I Engineering services for train station location analysis and/or study to add a railroad crossing. b. Experience working with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) on roadway, traffic signal, and railroad connectivity projects. c. Pedestrian signal design and construction at railroad corners. 4. Description of process to accomplish the required tasks of the project. This should include: a. An understanding of the project. b. Objectives to be met as part of the project. c. Your approach to completing the project. d. The projected number of hours to complete the project broken down by task and personnel. e. A project schedule. Phone &47/870 56,1�0 a�H� „�,.,!'�,, � � ro Exhibit B General Scope of Work Agency: Village of Mount Prospect Project: Downtown Transportation Study Location: Roadway, Railroad & Pedestrian Systems around the Mount Prospect Train Station A key component of the Mount Prospect Strategic Plan is to partner with appropriate government agencies to resolve troublesome intersection issues. One such area that has received attention in recent years is the downtown. There are many modes of transportation that share this small space that has resulted in congestion concerns. Six closely -spaced, interconnected traffic signals look to efficiently move vehicles on high volume roadways including IL Route 83, Northwest Highway (US 14), and Central Road. The Union Pacific Railroad has three tracks running through Mount Prospect with a train station located between IL Route 83 and Emerson Street. In addition, over seventy trains travel through the Village daily and there are four at -grade road crossings on the Northwest Line. And finally, with many businesses and a train station in the downtown, pedestrians and bicyclists play an important part in the community's vitality. Last year the Village commissioned a report that began to look at opportunities to reduce congestion, improve mobility, and enhance safety. One key accomplishment was reviewing and modifying the traffic signal timing programs to better reflect today's conditions. The changes, made with the partnership of IDOT, have improved traffic flow and reduced delays. Building on the report, the Village wishes to complete three tasks with this study. 1. Train Station Location Analysis The primary delay to traffic on IL Route 83 in downtown Mount Prospect is caused by stopped trains at the train station blocking the roadway. Can the train station be relocated to a new location between Central Road and Mount Prospect Road so that the gates at IL Route 83, Central Road and Mount Prospect Road (and Emerson Street if practical) do not remain down when a train is stopped at the station? A detailed analysis is to be performed to examine possible locations for the train station and the implications on adjacent crossings. Coordination with the ICC, IDOT, Union Pacific and Metra will be critical to the success of this task. Work is to also include preliminary layouts for a building, parking lot(s), and access to the road network. Right-of-way constraints and topography challenges will also need to be identified and preliminary estimates of costs are to be provided. 2. Additional Road Crossing at Railroad Tracks The downtown has two at -grade road crossings across the railroad tracks, IL Route 83 and Emerson Street. The limited number of crossings can cause congestion at peak travel times of the day, especially for local residents. An additional crossing (at -grade or separated) may alleviate traffic delays to the benefit of the community. It should be noted the Village is considering redeveloping the south side of Prospect Avenue between Maple Street and School Street to create new housing and commercial developments. This will only add to the need for an efficient roadway network. A detailed analysis is to be performed to identify one or two potential intersections to provide a new crossing. Coordination with the ICC, IDOT, Union Pacific and Metra will be critical to the success of this task. Discussion on the impact of existing crossings is to be included in this task. Right-of-way constraints and topography challenges will also need to be identified and preliminary estimates of costs are to be provided. Phone &47/870 56,1�0 :::a�H� „�,.,!'�,, � � ro 3. Separated Pedestrian Push Buttons at Downtown Intersections Pedestrian signals and crosswalks exist at the three signalized intersections adjacent to the train station: IL Route 83 & Northwest Hwy, IL Route 83 & Prospect Avenue, and Northwest Hwy & Emerson Street. However, each corner has a single pedestrian push button that puts a call into two directions. This leads to inefficiencies to the traffic signal timing and can result in vehicle delays. The Village wishes to explore the possibility of installing two push buttons at each corner that each operates a single direction. A detailed analysis is to be performed to determine what material modifications are to be made at each intersection and in the traffic signal cabinets. Coordination with IDOT will be important. Preliminary estimates of cost for design engineering and construction are to be provided. The contract awarded to the selected consultant will be for professional services to complete Phase I Engineering for the three tasks described above. It is our expectation this study will provide clear direction on ways to enhance mobility along the different transportation systems in the downtown which can, in turn, encourage economic development and growth. The Village of Mount Prospect appreciates your interest in this project. Any questions regarding this Request for Statement of Qualifications can be directed to Matt Lawrie, Traffic Engineer, by phone at 847-870-5640 or email at mlawrie@mountprospect.org. Tentative Schedule Task Deadline Submit proposal February 24, 2017 Select firms for interviews March 10, 2017 Select firm and negotiate contract March 17, 2017 Award contract April 4, 2017 Kick-off meeting with Village April 11, 2017 Complete Phase I Engineering Draft Report May 19, 2017 Complete Phase I Engineering Final Report June 16, 2017 Presentation to Village Board June 27, 2017 Phone &47/870 r ter+,,. Sam Schwartz Consulting, L.L.C. 1000 W. Irving Park Road, Suite 130 Itasca, IL 60143 phone: (630) 2-13-1000 samschwartz.com Mr. Matt Lawrie, P.E. Traffic Engineer Village of Mt. Prospect - Department of Public Works 1700 W. Central Rd. Mt. Prospect, Illinois 600S6 am in aciairion 7U -U= -0'U anct Uflult(l WOM Ofuel oor bUt y of the 4 signal system in Downtown Mt. Prospect, Sam Schwartz is pleased to provide the following proposal for supplemental services to the Village on a Time and Material not to exceed basis for each task. • Task is Analysis for Optimal Train Station Location • Task 2: Capacity Analysis of Closing Prospect Ave • Task 3: Comparison of Operations in other Municipalities • Task 4: Testimony at Village Board Hearing • Task 5: Summary of Lake County Traffic Management System The above items are detailed in the attached scope of services. Any additional services outside the scope presented here will be billed separately according to the attached rate sheet as a change order. The change order must be approved by the client before any additional work will be undertaken. If you agree with this scope of services and budget, as well as the attached standard terms, please sign where indicated below and return a copy of the proposal to our office. 13M Peter A. Wojtkiewicz, RE, PTOE Vice President Director - Traffic Signal Operations Proposed Scope of Services Task i - Analysis for ODtimal Train Station Location Sam Schwartz will determine the optimal location for a potential new train station that would 1' 71 ,Q%-. frwyAwv�,, 2--nvi 1-.n*- c -if rqilrt),?2 f r rTt 'J 14. This task will involve collection of data either directly from Metra or from field observations determine the length of trains during the peak hour. We would coordinate with both IDOT and t Fee. Not to exceed $2000.00 Sam Schwartz will perform Synchro analysis to determine potential improvements in Levels of Service at the intersection of IL 83 / US 14 / Prospect Ave. if the signalized phases for Prospect Ave were taken out. The following deliverables will be produced in Task 2 Synchro Intersection Timing Report show potential peak period Cycle - Lengths of the entire downtown system with Prospect Ave. closed. Sam Schwartz will collect data from IDOT and other sources to provide the Village a report containing a summary of operational characteristics of similar traffic signal systems in towns affected by railroad crossings such LaGrange, Des Plaines, and Arlington Heights. If available the report will contain data such as cycle length comparison and speed delay studies lf desired by Public Works staff, Sam Schwartz will present any information generated on Tasks i or the 2 assigned IDOT work orders at one Village Board meeting to explain the limitations operation of traffic signals in Downtown Mt. Prospect. Fee: Not to exceed $500.00 W47MITM 0; Sam Schwartz will request from Lake County a summary of . r to build their Traffic Management Center (TMC) and corresponding communication network. Sam Schwartz will deliver a document that estimates both the cost of the system, and a summary of the timing on IDOT signals from the TMC. Standards and Conditions The standards and conditions for this proposal are attached. Cost of Services We estimate a cost of $6,400 to complete Tasks 1-5. Please note that this proposal shall be binding for 45 days from the date of issuance (March 4, 2016). Additional Services Any additional services not included in the scope of services will be billed as time and materials and be based on our hourly rates and travel costs. A change order must be approved by the client before SSE can commence work on any additional services. These additional services may include updating the report with new information from the client, meetings, or responding to comments from a reviewing agency. AUTHORIZATION Please indicate acceptance of this agreement by signing one copy and returning it to SAM SCHWARTZ. The study will begin upon receipt of written authorization to proceed via email, mail, fax, or messenger. SAM SCHWARTZ appreciates the opportunity to provide the Village of Mt. Prospect with Professional Traffic Engineering Services. Accepted, Sean Dorsey , Director of Public Works Village of Mt. Prospect - Department of Public Works 1700 W. Central Rd. Date: Sam Schwartz Consulting, LLC (SSC) Standard Terms and Conditions A. Basic Services: Compensation for the Basic Services shall be billed monthly in accordance with the SSC's standard invoicing practices or as otherwise provided in below. Employee hourly rates are subject to reasonable annual increases. B. Additional Services: Additional Services shall be billed at employee hours times standard hourly rates for each applicable class of services rendered in accordance with the attached rate sheet or an agreed fixed amount. C. Client Supplied Information: SSC is entitled to rely upon the accuracy of any and all information supplied by Client or consultant(s) retained by Client. D. Reimbursable Expenses: Reimbursable Expenses are direct project related expenses for travel, tolls, mileage, lodging, meals, long distance telephone calls, fees paid for securing approval of governmental authorities, printing, copying, cost of any reproduction and postage. Reimbursable expenses shall be billed monthly at cost plus 15%. Copying & Printing 0.25 per page Plotter Printing 1.50 per square foot Blue Prints 0.35 per square foot E. Sub -Consultants: Sub -Consultant expenses are direct project related expenses billed to SSC for work performed on project plus the Sub -Consultant's associated reimbursable expenses and shall be billed monthly at cost plus 15%. F. Billing/Payments: Invoices for SSC's services shall be submitted, at SSC's option, either upon completion of such services or on a monthly basis. Invoices shall be payable within 30 days of the invoice date. If the invoice is not paid within 30 days, SSC may, without liability, after giving seven days written notice to Client, suspend services under this Agreement until SSC has been paid in full all amounts due for services, expenses and other related charges. Payments will be credited first to interest and then to principal. Retainers will be credited on the final invoice. G. Late Payments: Invoices unpaid 60 days after the invoice date shall be subject to a monthly service charge of 1.5 % (or the maximum prevailing rate) on overdue balances. In the event any portion, or all, of an account remains unpaid 90 days after billing, the Client shall pay all costs of collection including reasonable attorney's fees. H. Indemnification: The Client shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless SSC, its officers, directors, employees, agents and subconsultants, from and against all damage, liability and cost, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising out of or in any way connected with the Project or performance by SSC or the Client in connection with the services under this agreement, excepting only those damages, liabilities or costs, attributable to the negligence, breach or willful misconduct of SSC. Revised 03.04.16 Sam Schwartz Consulting, LLC (SSC) Standard Terms and Conditions I. Standard of Care: SSC will perform services under this Agreement in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the engineering and planning profession practicing contemporaneously under similar conditions in the locality of the project. No other representation, expressed or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended in this Agreement, or in any report, opinion, document, or otherwise. J. Certification, Guarantees and Warranties: SSC shall not be required to execute any document that would result in its certifying, guaranteeing, stamping or warranting the existence of conditions unless it agrees to do so by a separate written agreement. K. Limitation of Liability: In recognition of the relative risks, rewards and benefits of the project for both the Client and SSC, the Client agrees that to the fullest extent permitted by law, SSC's total liability to the Client for any and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses, damages, or claim expenses arising out of this agreement from any cause or causes, shall not exceed SSC's fee for the Project, or $250,000, whichever is greater. Such causes include, but are not limited to, the SSC's negligence, errors, omissions, strict liability, breach of contract or breach of warranty. L. Termination of Services: This agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notification should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of the party initiating the termination. The Client, upon thirty (30) days written notice, may terminate this agreement with SSC in the event that the Project is permanently abandoned. In the event of a termination as a result of either the above circumstances, the Client shall pay SSC for all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses, and reasonable termination expenses. M. Ownership of Documents: All reports, notes, drawings, specifications, data, calculations, and other documents, including those in electronic form, prepared by SSC are instruments of SSC's service that shall remain SSC's property. The Client agrees not to use SSC -generated documents for marketing purposes, for projects other than the project for which the documents were prepared by SSC, or for future modifications to this project, without SSC's express written permission. Any reuse or distribution to third parties without such express written permission or project - specific adaptation by SSC will be at the Client's sole risk and without liability to SSC or its employees, subsidiaries, independent professional associates, subconsultants, and subcontractors. Client shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless SSC from and against any and all costs, expenses, fees, losses, claims, demands, liabilities, suits, actions, and damages whatsoever arising out of or resulting from such unauthorized reuse or distribution. N. Dispute Resolution: Any claims or disputes arising from or relating to the Project between the Client and SSC shall be submitted to nonbinding mediation. The Client and SSC agree to a similar mediation agreement with all contractors, subcontractors, subconsultants, suppliers and fabricators, thereby providing for mediation as the primary method for dispute resolution between all parties. The laws of the state in which the SSC office executing this Agreement is located shall both govern the validity and interpretation of this Agreement, as well as become the venue for any ensuing litigation which may arise from the execution and performance of this agreement. Revised 03.04.16 Sam Schwartz Consulting, LLC (SSC) Standard Terms and Conditions O. Access to Site: SSC will have access to the work site for activities necessary for the performance of services. SSC will take precautions to minimize the damage due to these activities, but has not included in the fee nor shall it be responsible for the cost of restoration of any resulting damage. Further, SSC is not responsible for job site safety. The Project contractor(s) will retain full responsibilities for the means and methods of construction and safety for workmen and third parties. P. Hazardous Materials: The scope of SSC's services for this Agreement does not include any responsibility for detection, remediation, accidental release, or services relating to waste, oil, asbestos, lead, or other hazardous materials, as defined by Federal, State, and local laws or regulations. Q. Third Parties: Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or a cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the Client or SSC. SSC's services hereunder are being performed solely for the benefit of the Client, and no other entity shall have any claim against SSC because of this Agreement or SSC's performance of services hereunder. R. Consequential Damages: Neither the Client nor the SSC shall be liable to the other or shall make any claim for any incidental, indirect or consequential damages arising out of, or connected in any way to the Project or this Agreement. This mutual waiver includes, but is not limited to, damages related to loss of use, loss of profits, loss of income, loss of reputation, unrealized savings or diminution of property value and shall apply to any cause of action including negligence, strict liability, breach of contract and breach of warranty. S. Changes or Delays: The proposed fees constitute SSC's estimate to perform the services required to complete the Project. Required services often are not fully definable in the initial planning; accordingly, developments may dictate a change in the scope of services to be performed. Where this occurs, changes in the Agreement shall be negotiated and an equitable adjustment shall be made. Costs and schedule commitments shall be subject to renegotiation for unreasonable delays caused by the Client's failure to provide specified facilities, direction, or information, or if SSC's failure to perform is due to any act of God, labor trouble, fire, inclement weather, act of governmental authority, failure of transportation, accident, power failure, or interruption or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of SSC. Temporary work stoppage caused by any of the above may result in additional cost beyond that outlined in the accompanying Proposal. T. Confidentiality: SSC, its employees, affiliates, agents, contractors, representatives and officers shall not, without prior written approval of Client, disclose any information not already in the public domain with respect to this Agreement and the Services of the Project, any potential development regarding or related to the same, including issuance of any public relations or other publicity. Revised 03.04.16 Consulting Fees Effective July 1, 2015 J r Confidential 5/28/15 Hourly Rate Management President $625 Executive Vice President $350 Senior Vice President $300 Senior Principal $300 Vice President $250 Principal $250 Sr. Project Manager $225 Director $210 Project Manager $175 Traffic Engineering Sr. Engineer II $160 Sr. Engineer 1 $140 Engineer II $120 Engineer $95 Transportation Planning Sr. Planner/Urban Designer 11 $155 Sr. Planner/Urban Designer 1 $130 Planner/Urban Designer 11 $115 Planner/Urban Designer 1 $90 Transit & Rail Sr. Transit Planner 11 $155 Sr. Transit Planner 1 $130 Transit Engineer 11 $120 Transit Engineer 1 $95 Transit Planner 11 $115 Transit Planner 1 $90 Civil Design Senior Civil Engineer 11 $195 Senior Civil Engineer 1 $160 Civil Engineer 11 $120 Civil Engineer 1 $95 Sr. Civil Designer 11 $160 Sr. Civil Designer 1 $120 Civil Designer 11 $105 Civil Designer I $75 Construction Related Services Senior Engineer/MPT $170 Engineer/MPT $140 Senior Resident Engineer $200 Resident Engineer $160 Office Engineer/Senior Inspector $140 Inspector $115 Community Outreach Services Sr. Outreach Coordinator $115 Outreach Coordinator $100 Traffic Monitor $80 Technical Support Services Sr. CADD Operator/Graphic Designer $110 CADD Operator/Graphic Designer $90 Sr. Technician $65 Technician $55 Administrative Services Sr. Project Coordinator $90 Project Coordinator $70 Administrator 11 $60 Administrator 1 $50 J r Confidential 5/28/15