HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW Agenda Packet 11/09/2016COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
IIII����A'A� � IIIIIIIIIII �°� IIIh �������A'A'�IIIIIIIII IIIIIIII����A'A IIII'��'°'°u�"" ��° IIII VIII °°°'IIII°°" IIIIIIII����A'A'
Meeting Location:
50 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, I L 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
7:00 PM
MayorArlene A. Juracek
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Richard Rogers
Trustee John Matuszak Trustee Colleen Saccotelli
Trustee Steven Polit Trustee Michael Zadel
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of Minutes for the Committee of the Whole Meeting of June 14, 2016
III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IV. PROPOSED PROSPECT AND MAIN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
The Village is proposing to create the Prospect and Main Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
District that would include commercial properties along Prospect Avenue and NW
Highway and some properties that have been located in the Downtown TIF #1 District
but that have not benefitted from reinvestment.
The Prospect and Main TIF would provide the Village with an economic development
tool to encourage development on several key parcels in the downtown district and to
address many of the key recommendations in the Village's Downtown Plan. The key
parcels include the Busse Triangle, the NW corner of Central and Main, 105 S. Main, the
SW corner of Evergreen and Main, Chase Bank and the Parenti & Raffaelli block. In
addition the TIF would provide funds to stimulate private investment in existing
storefronts through the Fagade Improvement Program and a funding source for
infrastructure and streetscape enhancements in these areas.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 1 of 361
Staff and the Village's TIF consultant (SB Friedman) will make a presentation
highlighting the many benefits that the Prospect and Main TIF would provide to the
community and address questions/concerns that have been raised by residents and
other taxing districts. The meeting will also provide interested stakeholders with an
opportunity to ask questions and raise any issues that they may have related to the
proposed TIF District.
V. DOWNTOWN INTERSECTIONS STUDY
The Village of Mount Prospect and the Illinois Department of Transportation have
conducted traffic signal timing analyses of certain downtown intersections including
Central Road & Northwest Highway, Central Road & Prospect Avenue, Central Road &
Main Street, Main Street & Northwest Highway, Main Street & Prospect Avenue, and
Emerson Street & Northwest Highway. The purpose of this analysis was to assess
performance and determine if there is a means to improve traffic flow.
This study also examined other downtown traffic related ideas including assessing the
feasibility of relocating the commuter train station, comparing downtown traffic flow with
similarly situated communities, analyzing the impact of closing Prospect Avenue at Main
Street, and summarizing the potential for constructing a coordinated downtown traffic
control system similar to Lake County Department of Transportation's PASSAGE
network.
Village staff and a representative from Sam Schwartz Engineering, the traffic consultant
that performed the study, will present these findings and facilitate discussion.
VI. MANAGER'S REPORT
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
NOTE. ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OFA
DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGERS OFFICE AT 50 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056,
847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 2 of 361
Item II. :
Department:
Approval of Minutes for the Committee of the Whole Meeting of June
14, 2016
SUPPORTS THE FOLLOWING STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
D Minutes
Type Upload Date File Name
Backup Material 11/3/2016 6-14-2016_COW_Minutes.pdf
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 3 of 361
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES
June 14, 2016
I. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Village Board Room of the Village
Hall, 50 South Emerson Street, by Mayor Arlene Juracek. Trustees present included
Paul Hoefert, John Matuszak, Steven Polit, Richard Rogers, Colleen Saccotelli and
Michael Zadel. Staff present included Village Manager Michael Cassady, Interim
Assistant to the Village Manager Nellie Beckner, Police Chief Timothy Janowick, Public
Works Director Sean Dorsey, Village Engineer Jeffrey Wulbecker and Administrative
Analyst Alexander Bertolucci.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approval of Committee of the Whole Minutes for April 12, 2016
Motion made by Trustee Zadel seconded by Trustee Rogers. Minutes were approved.
Approval of Joint Financial Workshop Minutes for April 26, 2016
Motion made by Trustee Rogers seconded by Trustee Polit. Minutes were approved.
Trustee Zadel abstained.
III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
Louis Goodman, 310 N. School asked for an update on the Community Survey and if
the survey will be reviewed by the Village Board before it is finalized.
Kenneth Brey, 18 S. Owen expressed concern regarding the safety of pedestrians and
cyclists in Mount Prospect in light of the fatal collision last week. The accident occurred
at the newest and highest technology crossing at an uncontrolled intersection; however,
his observations over the years are that these types of crosswalks are dysfunctional.
Traffic is supposed to stop and yield to a pedestrian, but that simply does not happen
and this accident is a direct result. He requested the Village to show concern, remedy
the situation and consider reconfiguring the crosswalk with temporary safety
improvements.
The Village Board responded by stating the police department and other agencies are
still reviewing the accident and evidence from the fatal collision last week. There are
also IDOT standards and federal rules involved with this pedestrian crossing design.
Once the investigation is concluded the Transportation Safety Commission will take a
detailed look at the incident and crossing. Additionally, this could be a topic of
investigation at a regional level possibly through the Northwest Municipal Conference.
Committee of the Whole Page 1 of 5 06/14/16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 4 of 361
IV. MOSQUITO ABATEMENT AND ZIKA VIRUS UPDATE:
Cook County Northwest Mosquito Abatement District (NWMAD) Entomologist, Patrick
Irwin, began the presentation with the district's mission statement, a summary of district
statistics and how NWMAD manages mosquito populations.
He stated that there are over 30 different types of mosquitos. The two main mosquito
types are floodwater (nuisance biter) and disease vector (carries West Nile virus). The
life cycle of a mosquito ranges from ten days to two weeks.
Mr. Irwin provided the history of West Nile Virus (WNv) which first appeared in the
Chicago area in 2001. The mosquitos that carry the virus primarily feed on birds with
occasional opportune blood meals from people or horses. He reviewed WNv symptoms
and treatment. 80% of people who get WNv have no disease symptoms with 1 % having
the virus impact the central nervous system. The NWMAD's response to WNv includes
larval surveillance and 39 adult mosquito traps run seven days a week throughout the
district. Vector mosquitoes are tested for WNv in NWMAD's lab.
He presented information on the Zika virus and stated that the two mosquito species
which spread Zika virus are not found in the Chicago area; however, annual
temperatures in southern Illinois could provide a climate to support the Zika carrying
mosquito species. The NWMAD does monitor for Zika carrying species in case there is
an introduction. He also discussed how the Zika virus can affect pregnancies.
Mr. Irwin shared the importance of removing standing water from yards to reduce
mosquito populations and provided tips on how to protect against mosquito bites.
General comments from Village Board members included the following items:
• There were questions regarding how the Zika virus could be transmitted.
• There was a discussion regarding mosquito repellants and commercial solutions.
• There were questions regarding a possible cure for the Zika virus and in
response Mr. Irwin noted that there is no cure at this time. The Zika virus is
similar to the Dengue virus which currently also does not have a vaccine.
• There was a general discussion regarding donating blood and blood
transfusions.
V. LEEVE 37 STATUS UPDATE:
Public Works Director Dorsey provided an overview of the steps taken since the
September 22, 2015, Committee of the Whole meeting when staff and representatives
from Christopher B. Burke Engineering, LTD (CBBEL) presented the final report
regarding Levee 37. He also introduced Dr. Christopher Burke to explain the status of
each initiative that came out of the September 22, 2015 meeting.
Dr. Christopher Burke from Christopher B. Burke Engineering, LTD presented
progress from meetings with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Illinois
Department of Natural Resources (IDNR), School District 21/River Trails Park District,
School District 26, City of Prospect Heights, Vacant Lot Hydraulic Analysis, and
Individual projects for below grade garages.
Committee of the Whole Page 2 of 5 06/14/16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 5 of 361
• USACE supports increasing the capacity of the pump stations and would
facilitate design of pump station improvements. Presently working with IDNR to
identify funds for this project.
• IDNR agreed to increase the discharge rate of the pump stations.
• Community Consolidated School District 21, River Trails School District 26, and
River Trails Park District did not object to stormwater storage improvements
proposed for their properties provided their existing facilities were not negatively
impacted.
• The cost of constructing stormwater detention on the existing vacant lots near
Camp McDonald Road and River Road could be prohibitive due to property
acquisition and soil remediation costs.
• The private property improvements would not alleviate street flooding and most
the work would involve improvements on private property.
• City of Prospect Heights remains communicative and interested in improving the
performance of storm water collection system tributary to the levee pump
stations.
General comments from Village Board members included the following items:
• It was noted that the discussions with USACE and IDNR are encouraging.
• There was a discussion regarding the benefits of private property improvements
versus public improvements to alleviate street flooding.
• There were questions regarding increasing pumping flow at Leeve 37, increasing
the existing pump sizes and adding another pump station.
• There was a recommendation to add another variable to the analysis of storm
water solutions which would be effectiveness to keep streets clear of flooding.
• There was a question regarding the timing of proposed solutions and identifying
the solutions that could be completed the fastest.
• There was discussion regarding intergovernmental agreements between the
Village and School District or Park District would be more feasible than pursuing
vacant lots for storm water detention.
VI. SIDEWALK PROGRAMS REPORT:
Public Works Director Dorsey provided an update on the Village's various sidewalk
programs related to the maintenance and care of the sidewalks. He presented on the
Shared Cost Sidewalk Program (50% Village/50% Property Owner and property owner
selects which sidewalks to replace), Sidewalk Maintenance Program (addresses
hazardous sidewalk complaints), New Sidewalk Program (adds sidewalk where none
currently exist), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program (Village
identifies sidewalk for replacement or improvement and funding provided by United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development), and Street Resurfacing
Program (addresses sidewalk maintenance and compliance issues adjacent to street
segments slated for resurfacing).
Staff estimates that approximately 2.3 million square feet of sidewalk will need to be
replaced due to defects or regulatory compliance issues. In addition, staff estimates that
approximately 238,360 square feet of new sidewalk is needed to complete sidewalk
systems or fill-in sidewalk gaps at various locations throughout the Village. In 2016
Committee of the Whole
Page 3 of 5
06/14/16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 6 of 361
dollars, the estimated cost to complete this work is $14.6 million. Staff seeks to use
CDBG and grant funding to assist in offsetting project costs.
Mr. Dorsey presented steps staff has implemented or is proposing to address the
sidewalk capital improvements. Staff modified the Street Resurfacing Program to include
all sidewalks adjacent to the street segments slated for resurfacing. The anticipated
activity level is 115,000 square feet per year and is intended to remediate a 40%
sidewalk failure rate over the course of 20 years. Staff proposes to modify the Shared
Cost Sidewalk Program by directing unspent, annually budgeted, funds to facilitate high
priority maintenance repairs. Also staff proposes the creation of a Motor Fuel Tax
Sidewalk Improvement Program to fund sidewalk repairs with Motor Fuel Tax monies
and by utilizing purchasing agreements such as the Municipal Partnering Initiative
concrete flatwork joint bid.
General comments from Village Board members included the following items:
• There were questions regarding available CDBG and potential of state funding.
• There was a question regarding the participation in the Shared Cost Sidewalk
Program.
• There were questions regarding quality assessments of concrete batches.
• There was a question if sidewalk along Golf Road is a Village or State sidewalk.
• The Board requested staff to investigate who is responsible for snow removal
from sidewalks around the intersection of Golf and Elmhurst Roads. Pedestrians
and commuters use these sidewalks year round, but sidewalks are generally
covered with snow due to their close proximity to the street.
VII. STATE OF THE STREETS/RESURFACING PROGRAM UPDATE:
Public Works Director Dorsey stated the Village has approximately 136 miles of
streets and alleys that are maintained by the Public Works Department. He provided a
history of the street resurfacing program starting when the program was accelerated in
1997. However, due to decreased funding the Village fell short of the targeted mileage
and in 2014 the Village Board provided additional funding to address resurfacing
backlog. Mr. Dorsey presented the current statistics and conditions of Village streets. A
couple highlights are that no streets needed reconstruction and most streets are aging
according to an average 20 -year life basis. He stated a "snapshot" evaluation is
conducted every 5 years. He stated the Village is on track with its goal to resurface
streets on an assumed 20 -year life basis and based on the potential for price increases
to future budgets staff needs to investigate with replacing only the surface (1.5" to 2.0")
on local streets rather than the traditional 1.5" binder and 1.5" surface replacement.
General comments from Village Board members included the following items:
• There were questions regarding application of the binder and future surface
irregularities.
• There was general discussion regarding concrete base to asphalt streets.
• There was a question regarding street construction materials and if there has
been any advancements or improvements.
Louis Goodman, 310 N. School asked a question regarding the amount of tar in the
asphalt and sealants.
Committee of the Whole Page 4 of 5 06/14/16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 7 of 361
VIII. MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager Michael Cassady introduced Nellie Beckner, who accepted the position
of Interim Assistant to the Village Manager. Her previous position was Senior Planner in
Community Development. Mr. Cassady also reminded everyone that Fridays on the
Green concert series has started for the summer and the second concert is Friday, June
17.
IX. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
O :TiT-
X. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:38 p.m.
ALEXANDER BERTOLUCCI
Administrative Analyst
Committee of the Whole Page 5 of 5 06/14/16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 8 of 361
Item IV.: PROPOSED PROSPECT AND MAIN TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT
Department: Community Development
Information:
The Village is proposing to create the Prospect and Main Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) District that would include commercial properties along Prospect Avenue and
NW Highway and some properties that have been located in the Downtown TIF #1
District but that have not benefitted from reinvestment. The proposed boundary is
depicted on the attached boundary map.
The Prospect and Main TIF would provide the Village with an economic
development tool to encourage development on several key parcels in the
downtown district and to address many of the key recommendations in the Village's
Downtown Plan. The key parcels include the Busse Triangle, the NW corner of
Central and Main, 105 S. Main, the SW corner of Evergreen and Main, Chase Bank
and the Parenti & Raffaelli block. In addition the TIF would provide funds to
stimulate private investment in existing storefronts through the Fagade Improvement
Program and a funding source for infrastructure and streetscape enhancements in
these areas.
The Village is pursuing the dissolution of the existing TIF and the creation of the
proposed TIF to further its efforts to create a vibrant downtown district. The current
TIF only has 5 years of term remaining which limits its capacity to stimulate
investment in the key parcels noted above that are located in the existing TIF. By
dissolving the current TIF and releasing the developed parcels, the Village is
providing all impacted taxing districts $18.6 million of new tax base to support their
operations. These parcels have increased in value by over 6 times since the
inception of the TIF back in 1985, while the EAV in the entire Village increased 2.6
times in value, clearly demonstrating the value of the TIF. Properties located in the
TIF that did not benefit from redevelopment actually declined in value by .5%.
Staff has met with impacted Mount Prospect units of government (District 57,
District 214, Mount Prospect Park District and Library) to discuss the new TIF
redevelopment strategy. Key concerns expressed by the School and Park Districts
is the 23 year term of the TIF and the loss of future growth in EAV if the Village is
successful in generating new development and investment interest in the District.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 9 of 361
After meeting with District 57 and Park District officials, the TIF boundary was
adjusted to include Lions Park and Lions Park School as well as the Central
Community Center so that TIF funds could potentially be used to enhance these
properties.
Staff and the Village's TIF consultant, SB Friedman Development Advisors, will
make a presentation highlighting the many benefits that the Prospect and Main TIF
would provide to the community and address questions/concerns that have been
raised by residents and other taxing districts. The meeting will also provide
interested stakeholders with an opportunity to ask questions and raise any issues
that they may have related to the proposed TIF District.
Alternatives:
No action is required. This Committee of the Whole review is an additional step in
the approval process defined by Statute to enhance transparency to residents,
business owners and other units of government.
Budget Impact:
N/A
Recommendation:
N/A
SUPPORTS THE FOLLOWING STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS:
INFRASTRUCTURE: Well designed, well maintained public spaces and
facilities, DEVELOPMENT. Balancing preservation, revitalization, growth, BUSINESS: Strong
local economy, support for innovation, entrepreneurialism and small business, COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS DISTRICTS: Vibrant downtown and commercial areas
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type Upload File Name
Date
Prospect and
D Main TI F Exhibit 11/1/2016 Mt Prospect _-_Proposed_Boundary_10-12-16.pdf
boundary —
map
Prospect and
D Main TI F Exhibit 11/1/2016 Prospect Main _TIF _Plan_10-4-16_NO_DRAFT.pdf
Eligibility
Report
Mt. Prospect -
Existing
Downtown Area Mt Prospect_-
D TIF & 11/4/2016 _E-xisting_and_Proposed_TI F_Boundary_Comparison_10-
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 10 of 31
Proposed Maps 12-16.pdf
TIF Boundry
comaprison
Opportunity
D sites in Area 11/4/2016 Opportunities_Sites_in_Downtown_Plan.pdf
Downtown Maps
Plan
Prospect and
D Main TI F Exhibit 11/1/2016 MPTI F_FAQ_--_10-12-16.pdf
FAQ
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 11 of 31
Ills ilii
t
N_
p a
any a�111oPe23
��
r,'
•y
p y
N
U
o
�
e ct Rd P2i }oa soad }W N
�y
o
O
H i
yQ
U o
`
S M1
z
a
•� �
�__
to
M,.ro
C
IS E)gl`d S
�a
O
cam
0
NPS
S a6aoa0 S
O
o
Q Q
Q'
N
EO
M
IS PaeMP3 N
is PaeMP3 S
CL>(0
W
2
Q o
IS slno� N
IS smog S
n,
o
�,,�
N N
af
CL
IS WeIIIW1 Nv
is welll!M S
i a
CL
LU
m
m is UOMO S
o
x
U U" � :U U ii �✓
w
w
IS looyoS S
nip
IS w13 N
IS W13 S r
IS aldeW N
r„
L
ISuosaaw3 N
IS uosaaw3 S
°
w
C
Q
0
0
IS URN_N
}S WEN S
0
�.
m
O
i
aIIM
}S N m
3S a111M S
LLc
a>
U
3S au!d N
`moo is au!d
S
o
m
,
Q'
m
e'
Q
any
'? p2j Isin4wl3 S
ipy }sanywl3 S
Q
Z
"
any }si ny W 13
V
any H N
a^y e�10 S
Z, �
aS:
l .H S
andIsniny:!snl!H
�+
ii
_0
0
x
any epadeM S0
S Wa Pella Ave
p
L
any rNalnne �.
Co
0
N
N
C:
any}saaod
anye}opueO-S
H
a�
.r
m
¢
SNaWaTaAve
Z
CL
E
_0
o
S Gathy
eny unnn0 aaS S
Q
—
Z ,
0
@
W presser
a
—
LVU
.,
Ia1oJ am S
qr
}S �a}seoue14
� N
5 Lancaster Ave
-0
O
0
U
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, IL
Tax Increment Financing ("TIF") Eligibility Study, and
Redevelopment Plan and Project
Prospect and Main Redevelopment
Project Area
REPORT: October 4, 2016
VISION I (ECONOMICS I STRATEGY I FINANCE I IMPLEMENTATION
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 13 of 31
Table „ ntent
SECTION
PAGE NUMBER
1. Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................1
2. Introduction..............................................................................................................................................5
3. Eligibility Study........................................................................................................................................10
4. Redevelopment Plan and Project........................................................................................................... 23
5. Financial Plan.......................................................................................................................................... 28
6. Required Findings and Tests...................................................................................................................35
7. Provisions for Amending Redevelopment Plan and Project...................................................................38
8. Commitment to Fair Employment Practices and Affirmative Action Plan..............................................39
Appendix 1: Boundary and Legal Description
Appendix 2: Summary of EAV by PIN
LIST OF MAPS
Map1: Community Context..........................................................................................................................6
Map2: Proposed RPA Boundary...................................................................................................................7
Map3: Existing Land Use..............................................................................................................................9
Map4A: Age of Structures..........................................................................................................................15
Map 413: Lack of Growth in EAV..................................................................................................................16
Map4C: Deterioration................................................................................................................................17
Map4D: Inadequate Utilities......................................................................................................................18
Map 4E: Lack of Community Planning........................................................................................................19
Map 5: Proposed Future Land Use.............................................................................................................
26
S. B. FRIEDMAN & COMPANY
221 N. LaSalle St. Suite 820 Chicago, IL 60601
T: 312.424.4250 F: 312.424.4262 E: info@sbfriedman.com
www.sL)fr°iedrrnan.corrn
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS i www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Page 14 of 31
1. Executive Summary
In March 2016, SB Friedman Development Advisors ("SB Friedman") was preliminarily engaged by the
Village of Mount Prospect (the "Village") to conduct an informal Tax Increment Financing ("TIF")
Eligibility Study. On August 16, 2016, the Village Board of Trustees, by motion, authorized SB Friedman
to conduct a formal TIF Eligibility Study and prepare a Redevelopment Plan and Project. This report
details the eligibility factors found within the Prospect and Main Redevelopment Project Area (the
"RPA") in support of its TIF designation as a "conservation area" within the definitions set forth in the
Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et seq., as amended (the
"Act"). In addition to the eligibility analysis, this report also contains the Redevelopment Plan and
Project (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the RPA.
The RPA consists of 235 parcels over approximately 178 acres (109 acres of parcel area and 69 acres of
public rights-of-way). In total, there are 246 Property Index Numbers and 128 buildings, including three
(3) condominium buildings. The RPA is centered around South Main Street and East Prospect Avenue in
the downtown area of the Village. The boundary of the RPA extends east to Mt. Prospect Road, west to
Central Road and Millers Lane, and north and south along Main Street. The proposed RPA also overlaps
with portions of the existing Downtown RPA, which, we assume throughout this Eligibility Study and
Redevelopment Plan and Project, will be dissolved prior to the adoption and creation of the Prospect
and Main TIF District (the "TIF District"). The RPA primarily includes commercial, industrial and retail
properties. Several residential and mixed-use buildings are also incorporated in the RPA.
Determination of Eligibility
This report concludes that the RPA is eligible for TIF designation as a "conservation area" under the
Illinois TIF statute (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 and subsequent amendments and supplements, or the "Act"),
because at least 50% of the structures are 35 years of age or older and the following four (4) improved -
land eligibility factors have been found to be present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed
throughout the RPA:
1. Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value
2. Deterioration
3. Inadequate Utilities
4. Lack of Community Planning
lledevelopment 1IlPlan Goal, Objectives and Strategies
The overall goal of this Redevelopment Plan and Project is to reduce or eliminate the conditions that
qualify the RPA as a "conservation area." Accordingly, this Redevelopment Plan will provide an
integrated and comprehensive strategy for supporting public and private development to strengthen
the downtown area as a neighborhood -level commercial and residential district.
Objectives. Five (5) broad objectives support the overall goal of area -wide revitalization of the RPA.
These include:
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 1 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 15 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Executive Summary • Section 1
1. Facilitate redevelopment of vacant or underutilized properties by providing resources for site
assembly and preparation—including demolition and environmental cleanup where necessary—and
marketing vacant and underutilized sites for development or redevelopment.
2. Facilitate the rehabilitation of existing properties within the RPA, and the preservation of
architecturally or historically significant buildings; and encourage the construction of new
commercial, residential, civic/cultural buildings and parks/open spaces compatible with the existing
character of the area. The Village may use TIF funds to encourage new private sector development
by reimbursing developers for eligible construction costs, which include but are not limited to
stormwater facilities, demolition, environmental remediation and site preparation.
3. Provide resources for streetscaping, landscaping and wayfinding signage to improve the image,
attractiveness and accessibility of the RPA; create a cohesive identity for the RPA and surrounding
area; strengthen connections between the areas north and south of railway in the RPA; and provide
buffering between different land uses and screening of unattractive service facilities such as parking
lots and loading areas, where appropriate.
4. Replace or repair public infrastructure to create an environment conducive to private investment
and flood mitigation. Public infrastructure includes but is not limited to streets, sidewalks, bike
routes, curbs, gutters, alleys, underground water and sanitation systems, and stormwater detention
infrastructure.
5. Support the goals and objectives of other overlapping plans, including but not limited to the Village's
Comprehensive Plan, Downtown Implementation Plan and Northwest Highway Corridor Plan; and
coordinate available Federal, State and local resources to further the goals of this Redevelopment
Plan and Project.
Strategies. These objectives will be implemented through four (4) specific and integrated strategies.
These include:
1. Redevelop Vacant and Underutilized Sites. The redevelopment of vacant and underutilized
properties within the RPA is expected to stimulate private investment and increase the overall
taxable value of properties within the RPA. Development of vacant and/or underutilized sites,
including parking lots, is anticipated to have a positive impact on other properties beyond the
individual project sites.
2. Facilitate Property Assembly, Demolition and Site Preparation. Sites may be acquired and
assembled for use by the Village to attract future private investment and development.
Consolidated ownership of multiple sites will streamline the redevelopment process and make it
easier to market to potential developers. In addition, financial assistance may be provided to
private developers seeking to acquire land and assemble sites to undertake projects supportive
of this Redevelopment Plan and Project.
To meet the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, the Village may acquire and
assemble property throughout the RPA. Land assemblage by the Village may be by purchase,
exchange, donation, lease, eminent domain, or through other programs, and may be for the
purpose of: (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers; or (b) sale, lease, conveyance or
dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Site preparation may
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
2
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 16 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Executive Summary • Section 1
include such preparatory work as demolition of existing improvements and environmental
remediation, where appropriate. Furthermore, the Village may require written redevelopment
agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the Village may
devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and
development.
3. Encourage Private Sector Activities. Through the creation and support of public-private
partnerships or through written agreements, the Village may provide financial and other
assistance to encourage the private sector, including local property owners and businesses, to
undertake redevelopment and new construction projects, and other improvements that are
consistent with the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project.
4. Implement Public Improvements. A series of public improvements throughout the RPA may be
designed and implemented to build upon and improve the character of the area, and to create a
more conducive environment for private development. TIF funding for public improvements is
intended to complement, and not replace, existing funding sources for public improvements in
the RPA.
These improvements may include new streets, streetscaping, street and sidewalk lighting,
alleyways, underground water and sewer infrastructure, parks or open space, and other public
improvements consistent with this Redevelopment Plan and Project. These public
improvements may be completed pursuant to redevelopment agreements with private entities
or intergovernmental agreements with other public entities, and may include the construction,
rehabilitation, renovation or restoration of public improvements on one or more parcels.
1f1eqit ' 1,,lrid irigs and Tests
The conditions required under the Act for the adoption of this Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan
and Project are found to be present within the RPA, as follows:
First, the equalized assessed value ("EAV") of the RPA has declined over all five (5) of the last five (5)
year-to-year periods, and has not kept pace with the Consumer Price Index. In addition, the EAV of the
RPA declined at a faster rate than the rest of the Village in four (4) out of five (5) of the past year-to-year
periods. On the whole, the RPA has not been subject to widespread growth and development through
investment by private enterprise. Building permit activity over the past five (5) years in the RPA indicates
some investment in commercial remodels. However, the level of investment has not been significant
enough to reverse the trends of declining property values in the RPA.
Second, the Village is required to find that, but for the designation of the TIF District and the use of Tax
Increment Financing, it is unlikely that significant investment will occur in the RPA. Without the support
of public resources, the redevelopment objectives of the RPA will most likely not be realized. The area -
wide improvements and development assistance needed to revitalize the RPA as a healthy, mixed-use
district are extensive and costly, and the private market on its own has shown little ability to absorb
these costs. Public resources to assist with public infrastructure improvements and project -specific
development costs are needed to leverage private investment and facilitate area -wide redevelopment.
TIF assistance may be used to fund rehabilitation, infrastructure improvements, and expansion of public
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 3 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 17 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Executive Summary • Section 1
facilities. Accordingly, but for the designation of a TIF district, these projects, which would contribute
substantially to area and Village -wide redevelopment, are unlikely to occur.
Third, the RPA includes only the contiguous real property that is expected to substantially benefit from
the proposed Redevelopment Plan and Project improvements.
Finally, the proposed land uses described in this Redevelopment Plan and Project are consistent with
approved land uses in the Village of Mount Prospect Comprehensive Plan, Downtown Implementation
Plan and Northwest Highway Corridor Plan. The redevelopment opportunities identified in this
Redevelopment Plan and Project will be substantially supported and their implementation facilitated
through the creation of the TIF District.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
4
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 18 of 31
2. Introduction
The fledevelopment IRroJect Area
This document serves as the Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project for the RPA located in
the downtown area of the Village of Mount Prospect. In March 2016, SB Friedman was preliminarily
engaged by the Village to conduct an informal TIF Eligibility Study. On August 16, 2016, the Village Board
of Trustees, by motion, authorized SB Friedman to conduct a formal TIF Eligibility Study and prepare a
Redevelopment Plan and Project.
This Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan and Project document summarizes the analyses and
findings of SB Friedman's work, which, unless otherwise noted, is solely the responsibility of SB
Friedman. The Village is entitled to rely on the findings and conclusions of this Eligibility Study and
Redevelopment Plan in designating the RPA as a redevelopment project area under the Act. SB Friedman
has prepared this Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan with the understanding that the Village
would rely: 1) on the findings and conclusions of the Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan in
proceeding with the designation of the RPA and the adoption and implementation of the
Redevelopment Plan; and 2) on the fact that SB Friedman has obtained the necessary information to
conclude that the RPA can be designated as a redevelopment project area under the Act; and 3) that the
Eligibility Study and Redevelopment Plan will comply with the Act.
The community context and boundary of the RPA are detailed in Map 1 and Map 2 on the following
pages. A formal legal description of the RPA is listed in Appendix 1.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 5 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 19 of 31
w
c
O
uu
a)
N
c
O
u
u
c
O
}.
c
Em
X
G1
c
O
V
c
3
E
E
O
V
;4
Q
m
OW—!,
R7
N
O
N
Q
H
Z
LU
a
O
LU
LU
Z
a
C
W_
cc
LL
m
N
O
u
C
E
v
w
i
0)
IL
r -
V)
O
C)
Q m
H o
ZLU
N
O
o �
> u >
C LU Z
Z
c
W_
LL j 0
co >�
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Existing Land Use
Introduction • Section 2
Based on SB Friedman's research, the following six (6) land uses have been identified within the RPA:
• Commercial
• Residential
• Mixed -Use
• Institutional
• Industrial
• Public Rights -of -Way
Map 3 on the following page displays a parcel -by -parcel breakdown of the above land uses.
The following is a description of predominant existing land uses in the RPA:
Commercial. The RPA includes a portion of the central retail core of the Village's downtown. Retail and
some office uses line much of the Northwest Highway and Prospect Avenue in the RPA. Commercial uses
can also be found along Central Road and Main Street in the RPA.
Residential. The few residential buildings in the RPA are located along Prospect Avenue and Emerson
Street. All of these properties are located in predominantly commercial areas.
Mixed -Use. The majority of residential units in the RPA are in mixed-use properties with apartments
located above ground -floor retail. These residential units are dispersed throughout the RPA.
Institutional. The RPA contains the Village Hall and several other public facilities located in the core
downtown. Lions Park Elementary School, Lions Park and the offices of the Mount Prospect Park District
are also located in the RPA.
Industrial. There are several industrial parcels located on southeastern sections of East Prospect Avenue
and on western sections of Central Road in the RPA.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
0
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 22 of 31
N
C
O
u
a)
N
C
O
u
O
C
Q
D_
C
C
U
v
Q
O �
Z
U
Q �
O J
CL dA
+ r -
c
7
O
W
O
Q
4d
M 133dSObdlw N
IS 121381V S
IS 392103`0 S
1S allVM03 S
is smo1 s
1S WtlI111M S
15 N3M0 S
1S IOOH:)S S
W
Q
2
a
m
J
G
W
as isanHwl3
5
0
D
LM
fY
W
o w
rr, C
•f '',
� C
�, 5
U
a1 E
0i C)
(R
O
CI]
�a
N
0
CL
0
Cl.
•---
IS NOSHUA13
J
'15 NIVVY
Is 3111M S
IS Mid S:
•
e
/
•U ,
as isanHwl3
5
0
D
LM
fY
W
o w
rr, C
•f '',
� C
�, 5
U
a1 E
0i C)
(R
O
CI]
�a
N
0
CL
0
Cl.
3. Eligibility study
IIRrovisions of the Illinois Tax Increment Allocation Iledevelopment Act
Based upon the conditions found within the RPA at the completion of SB Friedman's research and
assuming the existing Downtown RPA is dissolved prior to the adoption of the TIF District, it has been
determined that the RPA meets the eligibility requirements of the Act as a "conservation area." The
following text outlines the provisions of the Act to establish eligibility.
Under the Act, two (2) primary avenues exist to establish eligibility for an area to permit the use of Tax
Increment Financing for area redevelopment: declaring an area as a "blighted area" and/or a
"conservation area."
"Blighted areas" are those improved or vacant areas with blighting influences that are impacting the
public safety, health, morals or welfare of the community, and are substantially impairing the growth of
the tax base in the area. "Conservation areas" are those improved areas which are deteriorating and
declining, and soon may become blighted if the decline is not stopped and the deterioration is not
abated.
The statutory provisions of the Act specify how a district may be designated as a "blighted area" and/or
"conservation area." Both require evidence -based findings of certain eligibility factors listed in the Act.
The eligibility factors for each designation are identical for improved land. A separate set of factors
exists for the designation of vacant land as a "blighted area." There is no provision for designating
vacant land as a "conservation area."
1::::�actors for Improved Land
For improved land to constitute a "conservation area," it must have a minimum of 50% of the total
structures within the area aged thirty-five (35) years or older, plus a combination of three (3) or more of
the thirteen (13) following eligibility factors, which are detrimental to the public safety, health, morals
or welfare, and could result in such an area becoming a "blighted area." The thirteen (13) factors are:
1. Dilapidation. An advanced state of disrepair, or neglect of necessary repairs, to the primary
structural components of buildings or improvements in such a combination that a documented
building condition analysis determines that major repair is required, or that the defects are so
serious and so extensive that the buildings must be removed.
2. Obsolescence. The condition or process of falling into disuse. Structures have become ill-suited
for the original use.
3. Deterioration. With respect to buildings, defects including but not limited to major defects in
the secondary building components such as doors, windows, porches, gutters and downspouts,
and fascia. With respect to surface improvements, that the condition of roadways, alleys, curbs,
gutters, sidewalks, off-street parking, and surface storage areas evidence deterioration,
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 10 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 24 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Eligibility Study • Section 3
including but not limited to surface cracking, crumbling, potholes, depressions, loose paving
material, and weeds protruding through paved surfaces.
4. Presence of Structures below Minimum Code Standards. All structures that do not meet the
standards of zoning, subdivision, building, fire and other governmental codes applicable to
property, but not including housing and property maintenance codes.
5. Illegal Use of Individual Structures. The use of structures in violation of the applicable federal,
state or local laws, exclusive of those applicable to the "Presence of Structures below Minimum
Code Standards," In factor 4 above.
6. Excessive Vacancies. The presence of buildings that are unoccupied or under-utilized and that
represent an adverse influence on the area because of the frequency, extent or duration of the
vacancies.
7. Lack of Ventilation, Light or Sanitary Facilities. The absence of adequate ventilation for light or
air circulation in spaces or rooms without windows, or that require the removal of dust, odor,
gas, smoke or other noxious airborne materials. Inadequate natural light and ventilation means
the absence of skylights or windows for interior spaces or rooms, and improper window sizes
and amounts by room -area -to -window -area ratios. Inadequate sanitary facilities refer to the
absence or inadequacy of garbage storage and enclosure, bathroom facilities, hot water and
kitchens, and structural inadequacies preventing ingress and egress to and from all rooms and
units within a building.
8. Inadequate Utilities. Underground and overhead utilities, such as storm sewers and storm
drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and gas, telephone and electrical services that are shown
to be inadequate. Inadequate utilities are those that are: (i) of insufficient capacity to serve the
uses in the RPA; (ii) deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete or in disrepair; or (iii) lacking within the
RPA.
9. Excessive Land Coverage and Overcrowding of Structures and Community Facilities. The over -
intensive use of property and the crowding of buildings and accessory facilities onto a site.
Examples of problem conditions warranting the designation of an area as one exhibiting
excessive land coverage are: (i) the presence of buildings either improperly situated on parcels
or located on parcels of inadequate size and shape in relation to present-day standards of
development for health and safety, and (ii) the presence of multiple buildings on a single parcel.
For there to be a finding of excessive land coverage, these parcels must exhibit one or more of
the following conditions: (i) insufficient provision for light and air within or around buildings, (ii)
increased threat of spread of fire due to the close proximity of buildings, (iii) lack of adequate or
proper access to a public right-of-way, (iv) lack of reasonably required off-street parking, or (v)
inadequate provision for loading and service.
10. Deleterious Land Use or Layout. The existence of incompatible land use relationships, buildings
occupied by inappropriate mixed uses, or uses considered to be noxious, offensive or unsuitable
for the surrounding area.
11. Environmental Clean -Up. The RPA has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or
United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
11
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 25 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Eligibility Study • Section 3
an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has
determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances or underground
storage tanks required by state or federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a
material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the RPA.
12. Lack of Community Planning. The RPA was developed prior to or without the benefit or
guidance of a community plan. This means that the development occurred prior to the adoption
by the municipality of a comprehensive or other community plan, or that the plan was not
followed at the time of the area's development. This factor must be documented by evidence of
adverse or incompatible land use relationships, inadequate street layout, improper subdivision,
parcels of inadequate shape and size to meet contemporary development standards, or other
evidence demonstrating an absence of effective community planning.
13. Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value. The total EAV of the RPA has declined for three (3)
of the last five (5) consecutive annual periods prior to the year in which the RPA is designated;
or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three (3) of
the last five (5) consecutive annual periods for which information is available; or is increasing at
an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, published by
the United States Department of Labor or successor agency, for three (3) the last five (5)
consecutive annual periods prior to the year in which the RPA is designated.
For improved land to constitute a "blighted area," a combination of five (5) or more of the thirteen (13)
eligibility factors listed above, and at 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3, must: (a) meaningfully exist, and (b) be
reasonably distributed throughout the RPA.
1:::�actors for Vacant Land
According to the Act, there are two (2) ways by which vacant land can be designated as "blighted." One
way is to find that at least two (2) of six (6) factors from the list discussed below under the "Two -Factor
Test" are present to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA. The second
way is to find that at least one (1) of the six (6) factors discussed under the "One -Factor Test" is present
to a meaningful extent and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA.
TWO -FACTOR TEST
Under the provisions of the "blighted area" section of the Act, if the land is vacant, a combination of two
(2) or more of the following six (6) factors may be identified, which combine to impact the sound growth
in tax base for the TIF District.
1. Obsolete Platting of Vacant Land. This occurs where parcels of limited or narrow size, or
configurations of parcels of irregular size or shape, make it difficult to develop on a planned
basis and in a manner compatible with contemporary standards and requirements, or where
platting has failed to create rights -of -ways for streets or alleys, has created inadequate right-of-
way widths for streets, alleys or other public rights-of-way, or has omitted easements for public
utilities.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 12 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 26 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Eligibility Study • Section 3
2. Diversity of Ownership. Diversity of ownership is when adjacent properties are owned by
multiple parties. This factor applies when the number of owners of parcels of vacant land is
sufficient to retard or impede the ability to assemble the land for development.
3. Tax and Special Assessment Delinquencies. This factor is present when tax and special
assessment delinquencies exist or the property has been the subject of tax sales under the
Property Tax Code within the last five (5) years.
4. Deterioration of Structures or Site Improvements in Neighboring Areas adjacent to the Vacant
Land. Evidence of structural deterioration and area disinvestment in blocks adjacent to the
vacant land may substantiate why new development had not previously occurred on the vacant
parcels.
5. Environmental Clean -Up. The area has incurred Illinois Environmental Protection Agency or
United States Environmental Protection Agency remediation costs for, or a study conducted by
an independent consultant recognized as having expertise in environmental remediation has
determined a need for, the clean-up of hazardous waste, hazardous substances or underground
storage tanks required by State or Federal law, provided that the remediation costs constitute a
material impediment to the development or redevelopment of the RPA.
6. Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value. The total EAV of the RPA has declined for three (3)
of the last five (5) consecutive annual periods prior to the year in which the RPA is designated;
or is increasing at an annual rate that is less than the balance of the municipality for three (3) of
the last five (5) consecutive annual periods for which information is available; or is increasing at
an annual rate that is less than the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, published by
the United States Department of Labor or successor agency, for three (3) of the last five (5)
consecutive annual periods prior to the year in which the RPA is designated.
ONE -FACTOR TEST
As mentioned above, under the provisions of the "blighted area" section of the Act, if the land is vacant,
an area qualifies as "blighted" if one (1) or more of the following six (6) factors is found to be present to
a meaningful extent:
1. The area contains unused quarries, strip mines or strip mine ponds;
2. The area contains unused rail yards, rail track, or railroad rights-of-way;
3. The area, prior to its designation, is subject to: (i) chronic flooding that adversely impacts real
property in the area, as certified by a registered professional engineer or appropriate regulatory
agency, or (ii) surface water that discharges from all or a part of the area and contributes to
flooding within the same watershed, but only if the redevelopment project provides for facilities
or improvements to contribute to the alleviation of all or part of the flooding;
4. The area contains unused or illegal dumping sites;
5. The area was designated as a town center prior to January 1, 1982, is between 50 and 100 acres
in size, and is 75% vacant land; or
6. The area qualified as "blighted" prior to becoming vacant.
Additionally, under the "blighted area" section of the Act, eligibility may be established for those vacant
areas that would have qualified as a "blighted area" immediately prior to becoming vacant. Under this
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 13 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 27 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Eligibility Study • Section 3
test for establishing eligibility, building records may be reviewed to determine that a combination of five
(5) or more of the thirteen (13) "blighted area" eligibility factors, listed above, were present immediately
prior to demolition of the area's structures.
Methodology Overview and Determination of Eligibility
Analysis of the eligibility factors was conducted through research involving an extensive exterior survey
of the properties within the RPA, as well as a review of property records and infrastructure data.
Property records included Cook County assessor information, building permits and code violations. In
addition, to verify the age of area buildings, field observations were compared to the recorded age of
the buildings in property records obtained from the Cook County Assessor's Office.
Our survey of the area established that there are a total of 235 parcels and 128 buildings (not including
ancillary structures) within the RPA. All properties were examined for qualification factors consistent
with either "blighted area" or "conservation area" requirements of the Act. Since 85.2% of the
structures (109 out of 128 structures) were found to be 35 years of age or older, and the RPA has four
(4) eligibility factors present to a meaningful extent, we concluded that the Prospect and Main RPA
could qualify as a "conservation area."
To arrive at this designation, SB Friedman calculated the number of eligibility factors present on a
building -by -building or parcel -by -parcel basis within the RPA. When appropriate, we calculated the
presence of eligibility factors on infrastructure associated with the structures. Eligibility factors were
correlated to buildings using property files created from field observations and record searches. This
information was then graphically plotted on a tax parcel map of the RPA to establish the distribution of
eligibility factors, and to determine which factors were present to a major extent.
Conservation r Of,,Inding
As required by the Act, within a "conservation area," at least three (3) of the thirteen (13) eligibility
factors for improved property must be found to be present to a major extent within the RPA and at least
50% of the buildings must be thirty-five (35) years of age or older. Construction years for each building
were obtained from the Cook County Assessor's Office and—as stated in the previous section -85.2%
were over thirty-five (35) years of age as of 2016
Our research has revealed that the following four (4) factors are present to a major extent:
1. Lack of Growth in Equalized Assessed Value
2. Deterioration
3. Inadequate Utilities
4. Lack of Community Planning
On the following pages, Map 4A shows the age of buildings within the RPA, and Maps 4B through 4E on
illustrate the distribution of eligibility factors and highlights each parcel where the respective factors
were found to be present to a meaningful degree. The sections following the maps summarize our field
research as it pertains to each of the major eligibility factors identified within the RPA.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 14 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 28 of 31
M
C
O
u
u
a)
N
T
V)
N
T
I
Em
i
Ln
-1
Ln
O
Ln
C)
Q
H
Z
LUa
O
LU
LU
C)
Z
a
C
W_
cc
LL
m
N
O
u
C
E
v
S
rn
a�
M
C
O
u
u
a)
N
T
V)
N
T
I
Q
W
t
3
0
i
C7
0
Y
u
J
m
CL
m
��-
0
c�
a�
rn
(U
IL
i
i
Q0
c-1
R�* ,
M
C
O
u
u
a)
N
T
V)
N
T
I
��—
V
C
r -I
R
d (1)
Q-0
J E
W
W 0
0
C) Z
Z rn
a
LU
M
C
O
u
u
a)
N
T
V)
N
T
I
��-
C
i
i
00
c-1
R�* ,
a (1)
O -0
J E
W
W 0
O
C) Z
Z rn
a
W
M
C
O
u
u
a)
N
T
V)
N
T
I
dA
O
r_
O
fC
a
3
E
E
O
V
O
Y
U
J
W
Q
m
��-
i
i
R�* ,
a (1)
O
J
W
W
O
C Z
Z rn
a
LU
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Eligibility Study • Section 3
1. LACK OF GROWTH IN EAV
In order to qualify for this factor, the total EAV of the RPA must have either: a) declined; b) increased at
an annual rate that is less than the rest of the Village; or c) increased at a rate that is less than the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for at least three (3) of the last five (5) calendar
year-to-year periods prior to the year in which the RPA is designated. The total EAV is a measure of the
property value in the RPA. The EAV history of all the included tax parcels in the RPA was tabulated for
the last six (6) years (five (5) year-to-year periods) for which assessed values and EAV were available.
The most recent year for which final information is available is 2015.
Lack of growth in EAV is one of the strongest indicators that an area as a whole has been falling into a
state of decline. During the five (5) year-to-year periods from 2010 to 2015, the EAV of the RPA has
declined in all five (5) periods, had a rate of growth below the growth rate of the Consumer Price Rate
for all five (5) periods, and has grown slower than the EAV of the remaining parcels in the Village for four
(4) of the last five (5) periods (2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2013-2014, 2014-2015). The basis for this finding
is summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Percent Change in Annual Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) [1]
Prospect and Main RPA
-13,6%
-8,6%
-&5%
-0,5%
-4,0%
Decline in EAV YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Village EAV less RPA Parcels -10.8%
-6.5%
-13.5%
2.0%
-2.5%
RPA Parcels Growth Less than Village YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
Consumer Price Index (CPI) [1] 2.7%
1.5%
1.1%
1.7%
-0.3%
RPA Parcels Growth Less than CPI I YES I YES I YES I YES YES
Sources: Cook County Assessor, Cook County Clerk, Bureau of Labor Statistics, SB Friedman.
[1] Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers and all items, in the Chicago -Gary -Kenosha area, not seasonally adjusted.
This eligibility factor was analyzed area -wide and is considered to be present to a meaningful extent for
the entire Prospect and Main RPA as shown in Map 4B.
2. DETERIORATION
Of the 235 total parcels in the RPA, physical deterioration was observed on 139 parcels (59.1%). The
most common form of deterioration was on surface improvements, including parking and alleyways;
catalogued deterioration includes, but is not limited to surface cracking, crumbling, potholes,
depressions and weeds protruding through paved surfaces. Building deterioration included brick
spalling, missing tuck -pointing, and damaged fascia, soffits and stairways. This factor was found to be
meaningfully present and reasonably distributed throughout the RPA as shown in Map 4C.
3. INADEQUATE UTILITIES
The Act defines inadequate utilities as underground and overhead utilities, such as storm sewers and
storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and gas, telephone and electrical services, which are:
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 20 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 34 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Eligibility Study • Section 3
1) Of insufficient capacity to serve the uses in the RPA;
2) Deteriorated, antiquated, obsolete, or in disrepair; or
3) Lacking within the RPA.
Stormwater, water main and electrical line utility infrastructure is inadequate, antiquated and/or in
need of replacement to a meaningful extent throughout the RPA. The Public Works Department of the
Village identified a lack of adequate stormwater detention throughout the RPA due to the large number
of buildings constructed prior to the adoption of modern standards in the Village's building code. The
stormwater detention issues identified by the Public Works Department are also reflected in a 2011
comprehensive stormwater study conducted by Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company for the
Village. The study further concluded that private sector investment would be the most effective means
of resolving the Village's stormwater detention issues because costs would be too prohibitive for public
sector investment alone.
Additionally, significant upgrades are needed for several of the Village's water mains. The Village's 2016-
2020 Capital Improvement Plan identifies deteriorated water mains prone to leakage and in need of
replacement inside and outside the RPA. Water main repairs are estimated to cost $4.5 million in the
RPA alone.
Finally, low -hanging overhead utility infrastructure show signs of aging and disrepair. Several sections of
electrical utility poles lean or are supported by anchors that obstruct pedestrian right-of-ways within the
RPA.
Based upon these conditions, the inadequate utilities factor was found to be present to a meaningful
extent for 100% of the RPA's parcels as shown in Map 4D.
4. LACK OF COMMUNITY PLANNING
Lack of community planning within the RPA is an area -wide factor not necessarily attributable to any
one parcel. The Act provides that "Lack of Community Planning" can be found in areas that have been
developed without the benefit of a comprehensive plan, and as a result, have seen negative
consequences. Examples of negative consequences include: incompatible land use relationships,
inadequate street layout, improper subdivision, parcels of inadequate shape and size to meet
contemporary development standards, or other related conditions.
The Village was incorporated in 1917, but did not produce a comprehensive plan until 1965 by which
time 67.2% (86 of 128) of the buildings in the RPA today had already been constructed. The lack of
planning involved in the development of such a significant portion of the RPA has resulted in the
following adverse outcomes:
• At grade railway crossings at Central Road, Main Street and Emerson Street that inhibit both
vehicular and pedestrian traffic.
• Limited pedestrian refuge areas, particularly at high -traffic locations.
• Street layout at railway intersections, which has resulted in congestion delays and prompted the
need for a traffic signal timing study.
• Industrial uses in downtown that are incompatible with the civic, retail and residential character
of the area.
• Presence of curb -cuts and parking lots ill-suited for the pedestrian character of the downtown.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 21 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 35 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Eligibility Study • Section 3
• Narrow parcels along the Central Road corridor with depths that do not meet contemporary
standards, resulting in poor access for loading and service.
As with "Lack of Growth in EAV," the Act provides for "Lack of Community Planning" to be evaluated as
an area -wide factor. This factor was found to be meaningfully present and reasonably distributed
throughout the RPA as shown in Map 4E.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
22
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 36 of 31
4. Redevelopment Plan and Project
lledevelopment Needs the 1:11RA
The existing physical conditions in the RPA suggest the four (4) primary redevelopment needs for the
area:
1. Redevelopment of vacant and underutilized parcels;
2. Property assembly, demolition and site preparation;
3. Rehabilitation of existing buildings; and
4. Utility and infrastructure improvements.
This Redevelopment Plan and Project identifies the tools for the Village to support the enhancement of
the RPA as a vibrant mixed-use area, and to provide necessary infrastructure improvements and other
investments. These investments both benefit property owners in the RPA and support public and private
improvements that serve the best interests of the RPA and the Village as a whole.
Currently, the RPA is characterized by lack of growth in EAV, deterioration, inadequate utilities, and a
lack of community planning. It is our understanding that the Village does not have the financial
resources to help fund the improvements necessary to reduce or eliminate these blighting conditions.
This situation limits the potential for growth and contributes to the lack of new investment within the
RPA.
The goals, objectives and strategies discussed below have been developed to address these needs and
to facilitate the sustainable redevelopment of the RPA. Public improvements—including street, utility
and stormwater infrastructure—will help create an environment more conducive to private investment
within the RPA. To support specific projects and encourage future investment in the RPA, public
resources, including TIF, may be used for: site assembly, demolition, site preparation and/or
rehabilitation, and public infrastructure. In addition, TIF may be used to subsidize developer interest
costs related to a specific redevelopment project or projects.
Goal, Objectives and Strategies
The overall goal of this Redevelopment Plan and Project is to reduce or eliminate the conditions that
qualify the RPA as a "conservation area." Accordingly, this Redevelopment Plan and Project will provide
an integrated and comprehensive strategy for supporting public and private development to strengthen
the downtown area as a neighborhood -level commercial and residential district.
Objectives. Five (5) broad objectives support the overall goal of area -wide revitalization of the RPA.
These include:
1. Facilitate redevelopment of vacant or underutilized properties by providing resources for site
assembly and preparation—including demolition and environmental cleanup where necessary—
and marketing vacant and underutilized sites for development or redevelopment.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 23 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 37 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Redevelopment Plan and Project • Section 4
2. Facilitate the rehabilitation of existing properties within the RPA, and the preservation of
architecturally or historically significant buildings; and encourage the construction of new
commercial, residential, civic/cultural buildings and parks/open spaces compatible with the
existing character of the area. The Village may use TIF funds to encourage new private sector
development by reimbursing developers for eligible construction costs, which include but are
not limited to stormwater facilities, demolition, environmental remediation and site
preparation.
3. Provide resources for streetscaping, landscaping and wayfinding signage to improve the image,
attractiveness and accessibility of the RPA; create a cohesive identity for the RPA and
surrounding area; strengthen connections between the areas north and south of railway in the
RPA; and provide buffering between different land uses and screening of unattractive service
facilities such as parking lots and loading areas, where appropriate.
4. Replace or repair public infrastructure to create an environment conducive to private
investment and flood mitigation. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to streets,
sidewalks, bike routes, curbs, gutters, alleys, underground water and sanitation systems, and
stormwater retention and detention infrastructure.
5. Support the goals and objectives of other overlapping plans, including but not limited to the
Village's Comprehensive Plan, Downtown Implementation Plan and Northwest Highway Corridor
Plan; and coordinate available Federal, State and local resources to further the goals of this
Redevelopment Plan and Project.
Strategies. These objectives will be implemented through four (4) specific and integrated strategies.
These include:
1. Redevelop Vacant and Underutilized Sites. The redevelopment of vacant and underutilized
properties within the RPA is expected to stimulate private investment and increase the overall
taxable value of properties within the RPA. Development of vacant and/or underutilized sites,
including parking lots, is anticipated to have a positive impact on other properties beyond the
individual project sites.
2. Facilitate Property Assembly, Demolition and Site Preparation. Sites may be acquired and
assembled for use by the Village to attract future private investment and development.
Consolidated ownership of multiple sites will streamline the redevelopment process and make it
easier to market to potential developers. In addition, financial assistance may be provided to
private developers seeking to acquire land and assemble sites to undertake projects supportive
of this Redevelopment Plan and Project.
To meet the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, the Village may acquire and
assemble property throughout the RPA. Land assemblage by the Village may be by purchase,
exchange, donation, lease, eminent domain, or through other programs, and may be for the
purpose of: (a) sale, lease or conveyance to private developers; or (b) sale, lease, conveyance or
dedication for the construction of public improvements or facilities. Site preparation may
include such preparatory work as demolition of existing improvements and environmental
remediation, where appropriate. Furthermore, the Village may require written redevelopment
agreements with developers before acquiring any properties. As appropriate, the Village may
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
24
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 38 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Redevelopment Plan and Project • Section 4
devote acquired property to temporary uses until such property is scheduled for disposition and
development.
3. Encourage Private Sector Activities. Through the creation and support of public-private
partnerships or through written agreements, the Village may provide financial and other
assistance to encourage the private sector, including local property owners and businesses, to
undertake redevelopment and new construction projects, and other improvements that are
consistent with the goals of this Redevelopment Plan and Project.
4. Implement Public Improvements. A series of public improvements throughout the RPA may be
designed and implemented to build upon and improve the character of the RPA, and to create a
more conducive environment for private development. Public improvements that are
implemented with TIF assistance are intended to complement, and not replace, existing funding
sources for public improvements in the RPA.
These improvements may include new streets, streetscaping, street and sidewalk lighting,
alleyways, underground water and sewer infrastructure, parks or open space, and other public
improvements consistent with this Redevelopment Plan and Project. These public
improvements may be completed pursuant to redevelopment agreements with private entities
or intergovernmental agreements with other public entities, and may include the construction,
rehabilitation, renovation or restoration of public improvements on one or more parcels.
II sed 1:::,uture Land Use
This Redevelopment Plan and Project supports the proposed future land use of the RPA in the Village's
Comprehensive Plan by providing mechanisms for investment in public improvements to foster a more
vibrant mixed-use district in the RPA and the downtown of the Village as a whole.
Permitted future land uses are shown on Map 5 of the following page and listed below:
• Commercial
• Residential
• Public/Institutional
• Office Research
• Park/Open Space
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
25
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 39 of 31
v
i
Q0
N
N
0
N
C)
Q
H
Z
cW
G
d
Q
LU O
u
W
C
Z
o
W
cc LL coj
c�
0
O
v
a�
rn
m
IL
T
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
I,,,,,lousing Impact and Ilelated Matters
Redevelopment Plan and Project • Section 4
As set forth in the Act, if the Redevelopment Plan and Project for the RPA would result in the
displacement of residents from ten (10) or more inhabited residential units, or if the redevelopment
project area contains seventy-five (75) or more inhabited residential units and the village is unable to
certify that no displacement will occur, the village must prepare a housing impact study and incorporate
the study into the Redevelopment Plan and Project.
SB Friedman's field survey identified that there are thirty-five (35) housing units in the RPA, of which all
are believed to be occupied. The Village hereby certifies that no residential displacement will occur as a
result of this Redevelopment Plan and Project. Therefore, a housing impact study has not been prepared
for this Redevelopment Plan and Project.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
27
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 41 of 31
5. Financial Plan
Eligible Costs
The Act outlines several categories of expenditures that may be funded using TIF increment revenues.
These expenditures, referred to as eligible redevelopment project costs, include all reasonable or
necessary costs incurred or estimated to be incurred, and any such costs incidental to this
Redevelopment Plan and Project pursuant to the Act. The Village proposes to realize its goals and
objectives of redevelopment through public finance techniques, including but not limited to Tax
Increment Financing, and by undertaking certain activities and incurring certain costs. Some of the costs
listed below are eligible costs under the Act pursuant to an amendment that became effective
November 1, 1999. Such eligible costs may include, without limitation, the following:
1. Costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, implementation and
administration of the Redevelopment Plan and Project, including but not limited to staff and
professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, financial, planning or other
services, related hard and soft costs, and other related expenses; provided however, that no
such charges for professional services may be based on a percentage of the tax increment
collected;
2. Costs of marketing sites within the RPA to prospective businesses, developers and investors,
provided however, that no such charges for professional services may be based on a percentage
of the tax increment collected;
3. Property assembly costs, including but not limited to acquisition of land and other property, real
or personal, or rights or interest therein, demolition of buildings, clearing and grading of land,
site preparation, and site improvements that serve as an engineered barrier addressing ground -
level or below -ground environmental contamination, including but not limited to parking lots
and other concrete or asphalt barriers;
4. Costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction, repair or remodeling of existing public or private
buildings, fixtures and leasehold improvements;
5. Costs of the construction of public works or improvements consistent with the Act, including the
costs of replacing an existing public building if pursuant to the implementation of a
redevelopment project, the existing public building is to be demolished to use the site for
private investment or devoted to a different use requiring private investment;
6. Costs of job training and retraining projects, including the costs of "welfare to work" programs
implemented by businesses located within the RPA;
7. Financing costs, including but not limited to all necessary and incidental expenses related to the
issuance of obligations and which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued
thereunder, including interest accruing during the estimated period of construction of any
redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and for a period not exceeding 36
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 28 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 42 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Financial Plan • Section 5
months thereafter, and including reasonable reserves related thereto and interest accruing
during a construction period;
8. All or a portion of a taxing district's capital costs resulting from the redevelopment project
necessarily incurred or to be incurred in furtherance of the objectives of this Redevelopment
Plan and Project, to the extent the Village by written agreement accepts and approves such
costs;
9. An elementary, secondary or unit school district's increased costs attributable to assisted
housing units will be reimbursed, as provided in the Act;
10. A library district's increased per patron costs attributable to net new persons eligible to obtain a
library card living in assisted housing units, as further defined in the Act;
11. Relocation costs to the extent that the Village determines that relocation costs shall be paid or is
required to make payment of relocation costs by Federal or State law, or under the Act;
12. Payment in lieu of taxes, as defined in the Act;
13. Costs of job training, retraining, advanced vocational education or career education, including
but not limited to courses in occupational, semi -technical or technical fields leading directly to
employment, incurred by one or more taxing districts, provided that such costs: (i) are related to
the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vocational education or
career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in
the RPA; and (ii) when incurred by a taxing district or taxing districts other than the municipality,
are set forth in a written agreement by or among the Village and taxing district(s), which
agreement describes the program to be undertaken, including but not limited to, the number of
employees to be trained, a description of the training and services to be provided, the number
and type of positions available or to be available, itemized costs of the program and sources of
funds to pay for the same, and the term of the agreement. Such costs include, specifically, the
payment by the community college district of costs pursuant to Sections 3-37, 3-38, 3-40 and 3-
40.1 of the Public and Community College Act, as cited in the Act, and by the school districts of
cost pursuant to Section 10-22.20a and 10-23.3a of the School Code, as cited in the Act; and
14. Interest costs incurred by a developer related to the construction, renovation or rehabilitation
of a redevelopment project provided that:
a. Such costs are to be paid directly from the special tax allocation fund for the TIF District
established pursuant to the Act;
b. Such payments in any one (1) year may not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the annual
interest costs incurred by the developer with regard to the development project during
that year;
c. If there are not sufficient funds available in the special tax allocation fund to make the
payment pursuant to this paragraph (14), then the amount so due shall accrue and be
payable when sufficient funds are available in the special tax allocation fund;
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
29
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 43 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Financial Plan • Section 5
d. The total of such interest payments paid pursuant to the Act may not exceed thirty
percent (30%) of the total of: (i) cost paid or incurred by the developer for the
redevelopment project, and (ii) redevelopment project costs excluding any property
assembly costs and any relocation costs incurred by a municipality pursuant to the Act;
e. The percentage increases from thirty percent (30%) to seventy-five percent (75%) for
the interest cost incurred by a developer for the financing of rehabilitated or new
housing units for low-income households and very low-income households, as defined
in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act; and
f. Instead of the interest costs described above in paragraphs 14b. and 14d., a municipality
may pay from tax incremental revenues up to fifty percent (50%) of the cost of
construction, renovation and rehabilitation of new housing units (for ownership or
rental) to be occupied by low-income households and very low-income households, as
defined in Section 3 of the Illinois Affordable Housing Act, as more fully described in the
Act. If the units are part of a residential redevelopment project that includes units not
affordable to low- and very low-income households, only the low- and very low-income
units shall be eligible for this benefit under the Act.
Unless explicitly stated in the Act, and as provided for in relation to low and very low-income housing
units, the cost of construction of new privately owned buildings shall not be an eligible redevelopment
project cost.
If a Special Service Area is established pursuant to the Special Service Area Tax Act, 35 ILCS 235/0.01 et
seq., then any tax increment revenues derived from the tax imposed pursuant to the Special Service
Area Tax Act may be used within the redevelopment project area for the purposes permitted by the
Special Service Area Tax Act, as well as the purposes permitted by the Act.
Estimated fledevelopment Project Costs
The estimated eligible costs of this Redevelopment Plan and Project are shown in Table 2 on the
following page. The total eligible redevelopment costs provides an upper limit on expenditures that may
be funded using incremental property tax revenues, exclusive of capitalized interest, issuance costs,
interest, and other financing costs. Other sources of funds may also be used to defray costs within the
district. Additional funding, including but not limited to State and Federal grants, private developers'
contributions, land sales, sales taxes, and other outside sources, may be pursued and used by the Village
as a means of financing improvements and facilities within the RPA. These expenditures may be in
addition to those funded from tax increment revenues, and may be in addition to the budget shown in
Table 2, which limits expenditure of incremental property tax only.
Adjustments to the estimated line item costs in Table 2 are expected and may be made by the Village
without amendment to this Redevelopment Plan and Project.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 30 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 44 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Financial Plan • Section 5
Table 2: Estimated Redevelopment Project Costs
m m
m
II
m
1. Costs of Studies, Surveys, Plans, etc.'
$100,000
2. Site Marketing Costsz
$800,000
3. Property Assembly Costs3
$7,000,000
4. Costs of Building Rehabilitation, Repair or
$11,000,000
Remodeling4
5. Costs of Construction of Public Works5
$9,800,000
6. Costs of Job Training (Businesses)6
$200,000
7. Financing Costs'
$450,000
8. Taxing District Capital Costs$
$50,000
9. School District Increased Costs9
$50,000
10. Library District Increased Costs10
$50,000
11. Relocation Costs"
$200,000
12. Payments in Lieu of Taxes 12
$50,000
13. Costs of Job Training (Community College)13
$50,000
14. Interest Costs (Developer or Property Owner)14
$50,000
15. Administration 15
$100,000
16. Transfer to contiguous TIF District(s)16
$50,000
TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT COSTS [2] [3] [4]
$30,000,000
[1] This category may include paying for or reimbursing: (i) an elementary, secondary or unit school district's increased per
capita tuition costs attributed to assisted housing units, (ii) a library district's increased per patron costs attributed to assisted
housing units, and (iii) capital costs of taxing districts impacted by the redevelopment of the RPA. As permitted by the Act, to
the extent the Village by written agreement accepts and approves the same, the Village may pay or reimburse all or a portion of
a taxing district's capital costs resulting from a redevelopment project necessarily incurred or to be incurred within a taxing
district in furtherance of the objectives of this Redevelopment Plan and Project.
[2] Total Redevelopment Costs exclude any additional financing costs, including any interest expense, capitalized interest, and
costs associated with optional redemptions. These costs are subject to prevailing market conditions and are in addition to Total
Redevelopment Costs.
[3] Increases in estimated Total Redevelopment Costs of more than 5%, after adjustment for inflation from the date of this
Redevelopment Plan adoption, are subject to this Redevelopment Plan and Project's amendment procedures, as provided
under the Act.
[4] The amount of the Total Redevelopment Costs that can be incurred in the RPA will be reduced by the amount of
redevelopment project costs incurred in contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated from the RPA only by a
1 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(1), as amended from time to time.
2 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(1.6), as amended from time to time.
3 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(2), as amended from time to time.
4 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(3), as amended from time to time.
5 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(4), as amended from time to time.
6 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(5), as amended from time to time.
7 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(6), as amended from time to time.
8 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(7), as amended from time to time.
9 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(7.5), as amended from time to time.
10 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(7.7), as amended from time to time.
11 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(8), as amended from time to time.
12 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(9), as amended from time to time.
13 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(10), as amended from time to time.
14 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(11), as amended from time to time.
15 Including all categories of costs permitted under 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-3(q)(1), as amended from time to time.
16 As permitted, and regulated, by 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-4(q), or such other similar provision of the TIF Act, as may be
amended from time to time.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 31 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 45 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Financial Plan • Section 5
public right-of-way, that are permitted under the Act to be paid, and are paid, from incremental property taxes generated in
the RPA, but will not be reduced by the amount of redevelopment project costs incurred in the RPA that are paid from
incremental property taxes generated in contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated from the RPA by a public
right-of-way.
IIlPhasing and Scheduling the fledevelopment
Certain projects within the RPA that receive TIF benefits shall be governed by the terms of written
redevelopment agreements entered into between a developer and the Village. Other projects will
consist of Village reimbursements of the specified eligible redevelopment costs of applicants who qualify
under various programs developed by the Village and approved by the Village Board.
Where tax increment funds are used to pay eligible redevelopment project costs, to the extent funds are
available for such purposes, expenditures by the Village shall be coordinated to coincide on a reasonable
basis with the actual redevelopment expenditures of the developer(s). As provided in the Act, this
Redevelopment Plan and Project shall be completed, and all obligations issued to finance
redevelopment costs shall be retired, no later than December 31 of the year in which the payment to
the Village is to be made with respect to ad valorem taxes levied in the twenty-third calendar year
following the year in which the ordinance approving this RPA is adopted (by December 31, 2040, if the
ordinances establishing the RPA are adopted in 2017) unless the life of the TIF District is extended in
accordance with the Act.
Sources of 1::::�unds to lRay Costs
Funds necessary to pay for redevelopment project costs and/or Village obligations, which may be issued
or incurred to pay for such costs, are to be derived principally from tax increment revenues and/or
proceeds from Village obligations, which have as a repayment source tax increment revenue. To secure
the issuance of these obligations and the developer's performance of redevelopment agreement
obligations, the Village may require the utilization of guarantees, deposits, reserves and/or other forms
of security made available by private sector developers. The Village may incur redevelopment project
costs that are paid from Village funds other than incremental taxes, and the Village may then be
reimbursed for such costs from incremental taxes. In addition, the Village may utilize other funding
sources, as discussed above, to pay for costs within the district, in addition to those funded by
incremental property tax revenues.
The tax increment revenue, which will be used to fund tax increment obligations and eligible
redevelopment project costs, shall be the incremental real property tax revenues. Incremental real
property tax revenue is attributable to the increase of the current EAV of each taxable lot, block, tract,
or parcel of real property in the RPA over and above the certified initial EAV of each such property.
Without the use of such incremental revenues, the RPA is not likely to redevelop.
Other sources of funds, which may be used to pay for development costs and associated obligations
issued or incurred, include land disposition proceeds, State and Federal grants, sales taxes, investment
income, private investor and financial institution funds, and other sources of funds and revenues as the
Village and developer(s) from time to time may deem appropriate.
The RPA may be contiguous to, or be separated only by a public right-of-way from other redevelopment
areas created under the Act. The Village may utilize incremental property tax revenues received from
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 32 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 46 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Financial Plan • Section 5
the RPA to pay eligible redevelopment project costs or obligations issued to pay such costs, in other
contiguous redevelopment project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, and vice
versa. The amount of revenue from the RPA made available to support such contiguous redevelopment
project areas, or those separated only by a public right-of-way, when added to all amounts used to pay
eligible redevelopment project costs within the RPA, shall not exceed the Total Redevelopment Costs
described in Table 2 of this Redevelopment Plan.
If necessary, the redevelopment plans for other contiguous redevelopment project areas that may be or
already have been created under the Act may be drafted or amended, as applicable, to add appropriate
and parallel language to allow for sharing of revenues between such districts.
Issuance of Obligations
To finance eligible redevelopment project costs, the Village may issue bonds or obligations secured by
the anticipated tax increment revenue generated within the RPA, or such other bonds or obligations as
the Village may deem appropriate. The Village may require the utilization of guarantees, deposits, or
other forms of security made available by developers to secure such obligations. In addition, the Village
may provide other legally permissible credit enhancements to any obligations issued pursuant to the
Act.
All obligations issued by the Village pursuant to this Redevelopment Plan and Project and the Act shall
be retired within the timeframe described under "Phasing and Scheduling of the Redevelopment" sub-
section above. Also, the final maturity date of any such obligations that are issued may not be later than
twenty (20) years from their respective dates of issue. One (1) or more of a series of obligations may be
sold at one (1) or more times in order to implement this Redevelopment Plan and Project. The amounts
payable in any year as principal and interest on all obligations issued by the Village shall not exceed the
amounts available from tax increment revenues, or other sources of funds, if any, as may be provided by
ordinance. Obligations may be of parity or senior/junior lien nature. Obligations issued may be serial or
term maturities, and may or may not be subject to mandatory, sinking fund or optional redemptions.
In addition to paying redevelopment project costs, tax increment revenues may be used for the
scheduled and/or early retirement of obligations, and for reserves and bond sinking funds. To the extent
that real property tax increment is not required for such purposes or otherwise required, pledged,
earmarked or designated for anticipated redevelopment costs, revenues shall be declared surplus and
become available for distribution annually to area taxing districts in the manner provided by the Act.
�Most fl et EAV of lf peruse in the fledevelopment IRroject Area
The purpose of identifying the most recent "EAV" of the RPA is to provide an estimate of the initial EAV,
which the Cook County Clerk will certify for the purpose of annually calculating the incremental EAV and
incremental property taxes of the RPA. The 2015 EAV of all taxable parcels in the RPA is approximately
$36,897,894. The total EAV is subject to verification by the Cook County Clerk. After verification, the
final EAV figure shall become the "Certified Initial EAV" from which all incremental property taxes in the
Redevelopment Project Area will be calculated by Cook County. It is anticipated that the TIF District will
be adopted in early 2017, in which case the Certified Initial EAV will likely be defined based on 2015
equalized assessed values. The total EAV amounts by PIN for the RPA are summarized in Appendix 2.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 33 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 47 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Anticipated Equalized sassed Value
Financial Plan • Section 5
By 2040 (collection year 2041), the EAV for the Prospect and Main RPA is anticipated to be
approximately $59.8 million. This estimate is based on two key assumptions: (1) an inflation factor of
2.0% per year on the EAV of all properties within the RPA; and (2) an equalization factor of 1.0. While
this projection does not assume there will be redevelopment within the TIF District, it is likely that such
development could occur. Depending upon the actual redevelopment that occurs, EAV may be a higher
or lower amount than indicated above.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
34
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 48 of 31
6. Required Findings and Tests
Lack of Growthand IIRri ate Investment
The Village is required to evaluate whether or not the RPA has been subject to growth and private
investment and must substantiate a finding of lack of such investment prior to establishing the TIF
District. The "EAV" of the RPA has declined over all five (5) of the last five year-to-year periods, and has
not kept pace with growth in the Consumer Price Index or the balance of the Village. A review of
building permits over the past five (5) years indicated that the majority of building activity represents
only minor maintenance and repairs to existing structures. The impact of this activity has not been
significant enough to reverse the trend of declining property values.
Finding: The RPA on the whole has not been subject to growth and development through investment by
private enterprise and would not reasonably be anticipated to be developed without the adoption of this
Redevelopment Plan and Project.
But 1,,,, r...
The Village is required to find that, but for the designation of the TIF District and the use of Tax
Increment Financing, it is unlikely that significant investment will occur in the RPA.
Without the support of public resources, the redevelopment objectives for the RPA would most likely
not be realized. The area -wide improvements and development assistance resources needed to
redevelop and revitalize the RPA are extensive and costly, and the private market, on its own, has shown
little ability to absorb these costs. Public resources to assist with site preparation and public
infrastructure improvements are needed to leverage private investment and facilitate area -wide
redevelopment. TIF funds can be used to support building rehabilitation, utility and infrastructure
improvements, site assembly and preparation, and environmental remediation. Accordingly, but for the
designation of a TIF District, these projects, which would contribute substantially to area -wide
redevelopment, are unlikely to occur.
Finding: But for the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and Project, critical resources will be lacking
that would otherwise support the redevelopment of the RPA, and the RPA would not reasonably be
anticipated to be developed.
Conformance to the IlPlans of the Village
The Act specifies that the Redevelopment Plan and Project must "conform to the comprehensive plan
for the development of the municipality as a whole." The Future Land Use maps included in the Village's
Comprehensive Plan indicate a mix of uses for the RPA, including central commercial, neighborhood
commercial, public/institutional and light industrial and office research uses. The future land uses
outlined in this Redevelopment Plan and Project include commercial, residential/mixed-use,
public/institutional uses, office research and park/open space. Thus, the Redevelopment Plan and
Project conform to the Village's Comprehensive Plan.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 35 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 49 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA Required Findings and Tests • Section 6
Dates „ m lti n
The dates of completion of each project and retirement of obligations are described under "Phasing and
Scheduling of the Redevelopment" in Section 5 above.
Of,,,, n a nci l Impact the Iledevelopment IRrojIlect
As explained above, without the adoption of this Redevelopment Plan and Project and Tax Increment
Financing, the RPA is not expected to be redeveloped by private enterprise. Additionally, there is a
genuine threat that conditions found to qualify the RPA as a "conservation area" under the Act will
continue to exist and spread, and that the entire area will become a less attractive place to maintain and
improve existing buildings and sites. The relative decline of property values within the RPA may continue
and lead to a decline of property values in surrounding areas, thus reducing real estate tax revenue to all
taxing districts.
This document describes the comprehensive redevelopment program proposed to be undertaken by the
Village to create an environment in which private investment can reasonably occur. The redevelopment
program will be staged gradually over the twenty-three (23) -year life of the RPA. If the redevelopment
of the RPA is successful, various new projects will be undertaken that will assist in alleviating the
conditions found to qualify the RPA as a "conservation area" under the Act, creating new jobs and
promoting rehabilitation and development in the RPA.
This Redevelopment Plan and Project is expected to have short and long-term financial impacts on the
affected taxing districts. During the period when Tax Increment Financing is utilized, real estate tax
increment revenues from the increases in EAV over and above the Certified Initial EAV (established at
the time of adoption of this document by the Village) may be used to pay eligible redevelopment project
costs for the RPA. At the time when the RPA is no longer in place under the Act, the real estate tax
revenues resulting from the redevelopment of the RPA will be distributed to all taxing districts levying
taxes against property located in the RPA. These revenues will then be available for use by the affected
taxing districts.
Demand on Taxing District Services and Ilf rgram to Address1,,1ri ni l
and Service Impact
Redevelopment within the RPA may result in additional demands on services and facilities provided by
taxing districts. At this time, no special programs are proposed for these taxing districts. The nature of
the redevelopment that is likely to occur as a result of the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan
and Project consists of a mix of commercial, residential and public/institutional use.
The Village intends to monitor development in the area and, with the cooperation of the affected taxing
districts, will attempt to ensure that any increased needs are addressed in connection with any
particular development.
Therefore, while redevelopment activities in the RPA may have an impact on the school districts or other
taxing districts, no significant impacts are currently anticipated. Should service demands increase, the
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 36 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 50 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect: Prospect and Main RPA
Required Findings and Tests • Section 6
Village will work with the affected taxing districts to determine which, if any, programs are necessary to
provide adequate services.
The following taxing districts presently levy taxes on properties within the RPA:
• Cook County
• Village of Mount Prospect Special
• Cook County - Consolidated Elections
Service Area 5
• Forest Preserve District of Cook County
• Elementary School District 57
• Elk Grove Township
• Arlington Heights Township High School
• Elk Grove Township General Assistance
District 214
• Elk Grove Township Road and Bridge
• Harper Community College District 512
• Wheeling Township
• Mount Prospect Park District
• Wheeling Township General Assistance
• Elk Grove Rural Fire Protection District
• Wheeling Township Road and Bridge
• Metro Water Reclamation District of
• Village of Mount Prospect
Greater Chicago
• Village of Mount Prospect Library Fund
• Northwest Mosquito Abatement
District
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
37
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 51 of 31
7. Provisions for Amending Plan and Project
This Redevelopment Plan and Project document may be amended pursuant to the provisions of the Act.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 38 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 52 of 31
8. Commitment to Fair Employment Practices and
Affirmative Action Plan
The Village of Mount Prospect is an equal opportunity employer. As part of this Redevelopment Plan
and Project, the Village will work with any developers who assist in the redevelopment of the RPA to
implement an effective affirmative action program that conforms to Village policies and practices.
This program will ensure equal opportunity for all personnel regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age,
marital status, handicapped status, nation of origin, sexual preference, creed, or ancestry. This program
will also meet Village standards for any applicable prevailing wage rate as ascertained by the Illinois
Department of Labor. All entities involved are responsible for conformance to the policy that is put in
place.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
39
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 53 of 31
Appendix 1: Boundary Legal Description
PROPOSED PROSPECT AND MAIN TIF DISTRICT - MT. PROSPECT, IL
THAT PART OF SECTIONS 11 & 12 IN TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST
AND SECTIONS 33 & 34 IN TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE
THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BOUNDED AND
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
2. BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID, BEING ALSO THE CENTER LINE OF
MT. PROSPECT ROAD, AND THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHWEST
HIGHWAY, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO &
NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY;
3. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 12 AND THE CENTER LINE OF MT. PROSPECT ROAD TO THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY
RIGHT OF WAY, BEING ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PROSPECT
AVENUE;
4. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF
MT. PROSPECT ROAD WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PROSPECT
AVENUE;
5. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF
PROSPECT AVENUE TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 205 FEET OF LOT 1 IN
GLEICH'S INDUSTRIAL PARK, A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF
OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
6. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 205 FEET OF LOT 1 IN
GLEICH'S INDUSTRIAL PARK TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1
AFORESAID;
7. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN
GLEICH'S INDUSTRIAL PARK TO THE EAST LINE OF SCHOOL STREET;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SCHOOL STREET TO THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LINCOLN STREET;
9. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
LINCOLN STREET AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE
EAST LINE OF WILLIAM STREET;
10. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF WILLIAM STREET TO THE
SOUTH LINE OF SHA-BONEE TRAIL;
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 40 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 54 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA Appendix
11. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SHA-BONEE TRAIL TO THE
EAST LINE OF SCHOOL STREET;
12. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SCHOOL STREET TO THE
SOUTH LINE OF COUNCIL TRAIL;
13. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF COUNCIL TRAIL TO THE
SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 12 IN ELLENDALE, A
SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
14. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE EAST LINE
OF LOT 12 IN ELLENDALE TO THE NORTH LINE THEREOF;
15. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 12 IN ELLENDALE TO THE
EAST LINE OF LOT 3 IN ELLENDALE AFORESAID;
16. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 3 IN ELLENDALE AND THE
NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE NORTH LINE OF MOEHLING
DRIVE;
17. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF MOEHLING DRIVE AND THE
WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WEST LINE OF MAPLE STREET;
18. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF MAPLE STREET TO THE
NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 270 FEET OF LOT 2 IN ETHEL BUSSE'S
SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
19. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 270 FEET OF LOT 2
IN ETHEL BUSSE'S SUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 35 THRU 42 IN
BUSSE'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOT "A" IN BLOCK 11 IN BUSSE & WIL,LE'S
RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT AFORESAID;
20. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOTS 35 THRU 42 IN BUSSE'S
RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 2 IN MILLER RESUBDIVISION OF
LOTS 1 TO 3 & 43 IN BUSSE'S SUBDIVISION OF LOT "A" IN BLOCK 11 IN
BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT AFORESAID;
21. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 2 IN MILLER
RESUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PROSPECT AVENUE;
22. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF
PROSPECT AVENUE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN MILLER
RESUBDIVISION AFORESAID;
23. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN
MILLER RESUBDIVISION TO A BEND THEREIN;
24. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 IN MILLER
RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 3 IN MILLER RESUBDIVISION
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 41 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 55 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
AFORESAID;
Appendix
25. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 3 IN MILLER
RESUBDIVISION TO THE MOST EASTERLY WEST LINE OF LOT 2 IN MILLER
RESUBDIVISION AFORESAID;
26. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID MOST EASTERLY WEST LINE OF LOT 2 IN
MILLER RESUBDIVISION TO A BEND THEREIN;
27. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID MOST EASTERLY WEST LINE OF
LOT 2 IN MILLER RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF, AND THE
NORTH LINE OF LOT 42 IN BUSSE'S RESUBDIVISION AFORESAID;
28. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 42 IN BUSSE'S
RESUBDIVISION AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WEST
LINE OF EMERSON STREET;
29. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF EMERSON STREET TO THE
SOUTH LINE OF LOT 11 IN BUSSE'S RESUBDIVISION AFORESAID;
30. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 11 IN BUSSE'S
RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE OF LOTS 5 THRU 9 IN BLOCK 1 IN
MEIER'S ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION AFORESAID, LYING SOUTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY;
31. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOTS 5 THRU 9 IN BLOCK 1 IN
MEIER'S ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 5
AFORESAID;
32. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 5 IN BLOCK 1 IN MEIER'S
ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF
TO THE WEST LINE OF MAIN STREET;
33. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF MAIN STREET TO THE NORTH
LINE OF LOT 24 IN BLOCK 4 IN MEIER'S ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT
AFORESAID;
34. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 24 IN BLOCK 4 IN MEIER'S
ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT TO THE WEST LINE OF THE 20 FOOT WIDE
ALLEY EAST OF WILLE STREET;
35. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE 20 FOOT WIDE ALLEY
EAST OF WILLE STREET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF EVERGREEN AVENUE;
36. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF EVERGREEN AVENUE TO THE
WEST LINE OF WILLE STREET;
37. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF WILLE STREET TO THE SOUTH
LINE OF LOT 13 IN BUSSE'S RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 TO 6, INCLUSIVE, OF
RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 TO 6, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 4, ALOS OF LOTS 2 &
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 42 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 56 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
Appendix
3 IN BLOCK 5, ALL OF BLOCK 6, LOT 13 TO 24, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 7, LOTS
17 TO 20 IN BLOCK 8 ALL IN MEIER'S ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT IN THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
38. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13 IN BUSSE'S
RESUBDIVISION TO THE WEST LINE OF LOTS 13 AND 14 IN BUSSE'S
RESUBDIVISION;
39. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOTS 13 AND 14 IN BUSSE'S
RESUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE
ALLEY SOUTHWESTERLY OF PROSPECT AVENUE;
40. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 16
FOOT WIDE ALLEY SOUTHWESTERLY OF PROSPECT AVENUE AND THE
NORTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WEST LINE OF PINE
STREET;
41. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF PINE STREET TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY SOUTHWESTERLY OF
PROSPECT AVENUE;
42. THENCE WEST AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF
THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY SOUTHWESTERLY OF PROSPECT AVENUE AND
THE NORTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH
THE SOUTH LINE OF BUSSE AVENUE;
43. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF BUSSE AVENUE TO THE
SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF THE 20 FOOT WIDE ALLEY
WEST OF ELMHURST AVENUE;
44. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE WEST
LINE OF THE 20 FOOT WIDE ALLEY WEST OF ELMHURST AVENUE TO THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY SOUTHWESTERLY OF
PROSPECT AVENUE;
45. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 16
FOOT WIDE ALLEY SOUTHWESTERLY OF PROSPECT AVENUE AND THE
NORTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WEST LINE OF I-OKA
AVENUE;
46. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF I-OKA AVENUE TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY SOUTHWESTERLY OF
PROSPECT AVENUE;
47. THENCE WEST AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF
THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY SOUTHWESTERLY OF PROSPECT AVENUE AND
THE NORTHWESTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE WEST LINE OF HI-
LUSI AVENUE;
48. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF HI-LUSI AVENUE TO THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PROSPECT AVENUE;
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
43
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 57 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
49. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF
PROSPECT AVENUE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD;
Appendix
50. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD TO THE EAST
LINE OF LOT 8 IN H.ROY BERRY CO.S' COLONIAL MANOR, A SUBDIVISION
OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 AND PART OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
51. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 8 IN H.ROY BERRY CO.S'
COLONIAL MANOR AND THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE
SOUTH LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY SOUTH OF CENTRAL ROAD;
52. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY
SOUTH OF CENTRAL ROAD TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 AFORESAID;
53. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF CENTRAL
ROAD;
54. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD TO THE
SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF MILLERS LANE;
55. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE WEST
LINE OF MILLERS LANE TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH
LINE OF LOT 11 IN MILLERS STATION SUBDIVISION, A RESUBDIVISION OF
LOT 1 IN TRADE SERVICE PUBLICATIONS SUBDIVISION AND PART OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33
AFORESAID;
56. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND THE SOUTH LINE
OF LOT 11 IN MILLERS STATION SUBDIVISION AND THE EASTERLY
EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE EAST LINE OF CATHY LANE;
57. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CATHY LANE TO THE EAST
LINE OF LOT 12 IN MILLERS STATION SUBDIVISION AFORESAID;
58. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 12 IN MILLERS STATION
SUBDIVISION AND THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY
RIGHT OF WAY;
59. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTER RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY TO THE EAST LINE
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33 AFORESAID;
60. THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 33 AFORESAID TO THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH
LINE OF HENRY STREET;
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
44
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 58 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
Appendix
61. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND THE NORTH LINE
OF HENRY STREET TO THE EAST LINE OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE;
62. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE TO THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY NORTHEASTERLY OF
NORTHWEST HIGHWAY;
63. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 16
FOOT WIDE ALLEY NORTHEASTERLY OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY TO THE
WEST LINE OF PROSPECT MANOR AVENUE;
64. THENCE EAST PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF FAIRVIEW AVENUE
TO THE EAST LINE OF PROSPECT MANOR AVENUE;
65. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF PROSPECT MANOR AVENUE
TO THE NORTH LINE OF WALNUT STREET;
66. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF WALNUT STREET AND THE
EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE EAST LINE OF RIDGE AVENUE;
67. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF RIDGE AVENUE TO THE NORTH
LINE OF LOT 1 IN FRIEDRICH'S SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 4 & 5 IN BLOCK 25 IN
PROSPECT MANOR, A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTH 3/4 OF THE WEST HALF
OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 34 AFORESAID;
68. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN FRIEDRICH'S
SUBDIVISION TO THE WEST LINE OF ELMHURST AVENUE;
69. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF ELMHURST AVENUE TO THE
WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF
CONSOLIDATION OF THE WEST 70 FEET OF LOTS 1 THRU 10 IN BLOCK 3
AND PART OF BLOCK 4 IN THE ERNST BUSSE ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT
IN THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34
AFORESAID;
70. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENSION AND THE NORTH LINE
OF THE PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 1 IN THE PLAT
OF CONSOLIDATION AFORESAID;
71. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE LOT 1 IN THE PLAT OF
CONSOLIDATION TO THE NORTH LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD;
72. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD TO THE EAST
LINE OF PINE STREET;
73. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF PINE STREET TO THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY;
74. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
NORTHWEST HIGHWAY TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 IN CLOCK
TOWER PLACE RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 18 & 19 AND THE NORTH 22 FEET
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 45 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 59 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
Appendix
OF LOT 17 IN BLOCK 2 OF BUSSE & WILDE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT.
PROSPECT TOGETHER WITH LOT "A" IN CORPORATE SUBDIVISION NO. 8
VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT AND LOT 1 IN WIL,LE'S RECONSOLIDATION IN
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
75. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 IN
CLOCK TOWER PLACE RESUBDIVISION 38.06 FEET TO A BEND THEREIN;
76. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 IN CLOCK TOWER
PLACE RESUBDIVISION 28.07 FEET TO A BEND THEREIN;
77. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 IN
CLOCK TOWER PLACE RESUBDIVISION 18.61 FEET TO A BEND THEREIN;
78. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 IN CLOCK TOWER
PLACE RESUBDIVISION 30.63 FEET TO A BEND THEREIN;
79. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 IN CLOCK TOWER
PLACE RESUBDIVISION 65.92 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE THEREOF;
80. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 3 IN CLOCK TOWER PLACE
RESUBDIVISION TO THE WEST LINE OF WIL,LE STREET;
81. THENCE EAST TO THE EAST LINE OF WIL,LE STREET AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1 IN PROSPECT PLACE PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION OF
SUNDRY LOTS AND VACATED ALLEYS OF VARIOUS SUBDIVISIONS IN THE
WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
82. THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN PROSPECT PLACE PLAT
OF RESUBDIVISION TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF;
83. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 1 IN PROSPECT PLACE
PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTH LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD;
84. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD TO THE
SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WEST LINE OF LOT 1 IN TRAPANI'S
RESUBDIVISION OF LOT "A" IN BLOCK 1 IN THE ERNST BUSSE ADDITION TO
MT. PROSPECT AND LOT "A" IN HILLCREST SUBDIVISION IN THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34 AFORESAID;
85. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE WEST
LINE OF LOT 1, AND THE WEST LINE OF LOT 2 IN TRAPANI'S
RESUBDIVISION AND THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE
NORTH LINE OF HENRY STREET;
86. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF HENRY STREET TO THE EAST
LINE OF MAIN STREET;
87. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF MAIN STREET TO THE NORTH
LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD;
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 46 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 60 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
Appendix
88. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF CENTRAL ROAD TO THE EAST
LINE OF EMERSON STREET;
89. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF EMERSON STREET TO THE
NORTH LINE OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK 5 IN BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN
MT. PROSPECT IN THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
90. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK 5 IN BUSSE &
WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF;
91. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 13 IN BLOCK 5 IN BUSSE &
WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT TO THE NORTH LINE OF BUSSE
AVENUE;
92. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF BUSSE AVENUE TO THE EAST
LINE OF MAPLE STREET;
93. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF MAPLE STREET TO THE NORTH
LINE OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 11 IN BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT.
PROSPECT AFORESAID;
94. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 11 IN BUSSE &
WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF;
95. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 11 IN BUSSE &
WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT TO THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF;
96. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 9 IN BLOCK 11
IN BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT TO THE EAST LINE
OF LOT 12 IN BLOCK 11 IN BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT.
PROSPECT, BEING ALSO THE WESTERLY LINE OF VILLAGE COMMONS A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF LOTS 2, 3, 4 & OUT LOT 1 IN TAX
INCREMENT FINANCE SUBDIVISION NO. 1, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS A &
B IN THE RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 2 TO 6, PART OF LOT 1 IN THE
SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 10, LOT 16 IN BUSSE'S SUBDIVISION, LOTS 13 TO 15
IN BLOCK 11 & PART OF BLOCK 9 IN BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN
MT. PROSPECT IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
97. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF VILLAGE COMMONS A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 172.45 FEET TO A BEND THEREIN;
98. THENCE WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF VILLAGE COMMONS A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 4.63 FEET TO A BEND THEREIN;
99. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF VILLAGE COMMONS A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 147.65 FEET TO A BEND THEREIN;
100. THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF VILLAGE
COMMONS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTHEASTERLY
LINE OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY;
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 47 www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 61 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
Appendix
101. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
NORTHWEST HIGHWAY TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 IN TAX
INCREMENT FINANCE SUBDIVISION NO. 1, A RESUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF
BLOCKS 9, 10 & 11 IN BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
102. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1
IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 TO THE NORTHEASTERLY
LINE THEREOF;
103. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1
IN TAX INCREMENT FINANCE SUBDIVISION NO. 1 TO THE NORTH LINE OF
LOT A IN GEORGE R. BUSSE'S RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 9 IN
BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
104. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT A IN GEORGE R. BUSSE'S
RESUBDIVISION AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE EAST
LINE OF SCHOOL STREET;
105. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SCHOOL STREET TO THE
NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 33 IN MT. PROSPECT
SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
106. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT 33 IN
MT. PROSPECT SUBDIVISION AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO
THE EAST LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY EAST OF SCHOOL STREET;
107. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE 16 FOOT ALLEY EAST OF
SCHOOL STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN BRUCE'S
RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT OF LOTS 22 TO 27 IN BLOCK 20 IN MT.
PROSPECT SUBDIVISION IN SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
108. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 1 IN BRUCE'S
RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION
THEREOF TO THE EAST LINE OF OWEN STREET;
109. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF OWEN STREET TO THE
NORTHWESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 16
FOOT WIDE ALLEY NORTHEASTERLY OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY;
110. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY EXTENSION
AND THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY
NORTHEASTERLY OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY
EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE EAST LINE OF LOUIS STREET;
111. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOUIS STREET TO THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY NORTHEASTERLY OF
NORTHWEST HIGHWAY;
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
48
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 62 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
Appendix
112. THENCE EAST AND SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF
THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY NORTHEASTERLY OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE EAST LINE OF
EDWARDS STREET;
113. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF EDWARDS STREET TO THE
NORTH LINE OF LINCOLN STREET;
114. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LINCOLN STREET TO THE
NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE EAST LINE OF LOT 1 IN OLIVER'S
RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 12 & 13 IN H. ROY BERRY COMPANY'S
MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS (EXCEPT THE SOUTHERLY 66 FEET FOR ROAD)
ALSO BLOCK 26 IN BUSSE'S EASTERN ADDITION TO MT. PROSPECT IN THE
EAST HALF OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
115. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID NORTHERLY EXTENSION AND THE EAST LINE
OF LOT 1 IN OLIVER'S RESUBDIVISION TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY NORTHEASTERLY OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY;
116. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 16
FOOT WIDE ALLEY NORTHEASTERLY OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY TO THE
EAST LINE OF GEORGE STREET;
117. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF GEORGE STREET TO THE
NORTH LINE OF LOT 17 IN MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS, A SUBDIVISION NORTH
OF THE RAILROAD IN THE DIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
118. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 17 IN MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS TO THE EAST LINE THEREOF;
119. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 17 IN MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS TO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 16 FOOT WIDE ALLEY
NORTHEASTERLY OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY;
120. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE 16
FOOT WIDE ALLEY NORTHEASTERLY OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY TO THE
WEST LINE OF LOT 65 IN MAPLEWOOD HEIGHTS AFORESAID;
121. THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF LOT 65 IN MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS TO THE NORTH LINE THEREOF;
122. THENCE EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF LOT 65 IN MAPLEWOOD
HEIGHTS AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE EAST LINE OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12 AFORESAID, BEING ALSO THE
CENTER LINE OF MT. PROSPECT ROAD;
123. THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 12 AFORESAID, BEING ALSO THE CENTER LINE OF MT. PROSPECT
ROAD, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF NORTHWEST HIGHWAY, BEING
ALSO THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
49
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 63 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
RAILWAY RIGHT OF WAY, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Appendix
124. ll :� ➢,�� ��a (M
125. THAT PART OF LOT 1 IN DESIDERATA SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 1 IN BUSSE
& WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT IN SECTION 12 AFORESAID,
LYING NORTH OF A LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
126. BEGINNING ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AT POINT 246.07 FEET SOUTH
OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;
127. THENCE EAST PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A
DISTANCE OF 67.34 FEET;
128. THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A LINE DRAWN PERPENDICULAR TO
THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 65.76 FEET;
129. THENCE EAST PERPENDICULAR TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A
DISTANCE OF 55.38 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY EAST LINE OF SAID LOT
1, AND THE POINT OF TERMINUS OF SAID LINE;
130. ALSO
131. ALL OF VILLAGE CENTRE PHASE 1—B PLAT OF RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 6,77
8,9 IN BLOCK 13 IN BUSSE & WIL,LE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT
AND PARTS OF LOTS 8, 9, 10 IN BLOCK 15 IN MT. PROSPECT SUBDIVISION IN
SECTION 12 AFORESAID;
132. IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
50
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 64 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA Appendix
Appendix 2: Summary of EAV (by PIN)
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 65 of 31
Parcel Identification
2015 Equalized
Parcel Identification
2015 Equalized
Record
Number
Assessed Value
Record
Number
Assessed Value
1
03-33-419-002-0000
$533,425
38
08-11-203-001-0000
$146,984
2
03-33-419-005-0000
$1,608,951
39
08-11-203-008-0000
$71,716
3
03-33-419-007-0000
$208,960
40
08-11-203-009-0000
$71,716
4
03-33-419-011-0000
$16,878
41
08-11-203-024-0000
$252,619
5
03-33-419-012-1001
$663,592
42
08-11-203-025-0000
$127,066
6
03-33-419-012-1002
$69,317
43
08-11-203-026-0000
$154,103
7
03-33-419-012-1003
$76,973
44
08-11-204-015-0000
$305,151
8
03-33-419-012-1004
$46,445
45
08-11-204-016-0000
$170,709
9
03-33-419-012-1005
$45,421
46
08-11-204-017-0000
$199,537
10
03-33-419-012-1006
$51,361
47
08-11-205-007-0000
$107,348
11
03-33-419-012-1007
$63,684
48
08-11-205-014-0000
$86,185
12
03-33-419-013-0000
$0
49
08-11-205-015-0000
$201,445
13
03-34-320-053-0000
$32,465
50
08-11-205-016-0000
$226,823
14
03-34-320-054-0000
$37,167
51
08-11-205-017-0000
$2,330
15
03-34-320-057-0000
$0
52
08-11-205-018-0000
$1,969
16
03-34-324-008-0000
$523,186
53
08-11-205-019-0000
$2,340
17
03-34-325-013-0000
$80,055
54
08-11-205-020-0000
$5,905
18
03-34-325-014-0000
$69,045
55
08-11-500-001-0000
$0
19
03-34-325-015-0000
$201,234
56
08-12-100-007-0000
$230,139
20
03-34-325-016-0000
$81,600
57
08-12-100-008-0000
$100,245
21
03-34-325-017-0000
$211,938
58
08-12-100-013-0000
$141,225
22
03-34-325-018-0000
$553,711
59
08-12-100-015-0000
$4,008
23
03-34-326-008-0000
$416,953
60
08-12-100-016-8001
$0
24
03-34-326-009-0000
$472,477
61
08-12-100-016-8002
$72,202
25
03-34-328-001-0000
$335,094
62
08-12-101-023-0000
$333,792
26
03-34-328-009-0000
$169,583
63
08-12-102-029-0000
$327,705
27
03-34-328-010-0000
$23,267
64
08-12-102-030-0000
$126,740
28
03-34-328-011-0000
$103,914
65
08-12-102-056-0000
$0
29
03-34-328-016-0000
$172,105
66
08-12-102-057-0000
$0
30
03-34-328-017-0000
$0
67
08-12-102-058-0000
$8,347
31
03-34-328-019-0000
$25,172
68
08-12-102-059-0000
$0
32
03-34-328-020-0000
$133,425
69
08-12-102-060-0000
$4,363
33
03-34-328-021-0000
$173,453
70
08-12-102-061-0000
$0
34
03-34-328-022-0000
$259,376
71
08-12-102-062-0000
$461,154
35
03-34-331-015-0000
$0
72
08-12-103-014-0000
$0
36
03-34-331-018-0000
$1,787,890
73
08-12-103-017-0000
$0
37
03-34-500-001-0000
$0
74
08-12-103-019-0000
$0
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 51
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 65 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA Appendix
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 66 of 31
Parcel Identification
2015 Equalized
Parcel Identification
2015 Equalized
Record
Number
Assessed Value
Record
Number
Assessed Value
75
08-12-103-020-0000
$0
116
08-12-113-002-0000
$105,987
76
08-12-103-021-0000
$0
117
08-12-113-003-0000
$100,757
77
08-12-103-025-0000
$0
118
08-12-113-004-0000
$105,987
78
08-12-103-026-0000
$0
119
08-12-113-005-0000
$115,845
79
08-12-103-027-0000
$0
120
08-12-113-006-0000
$133,014
80
08-12-103-028-0000
$0
121
08-12-113-007-0000
$97,016
81
08-12-103-031-0000
$0
122
08-12-113-010-0000
$133,425
82
08-12-103-032-0000
$0
123
08-12-113-011-0000
$168,252
83
08-12-104-009-0000
$78,264
124
08-12-113-012-0000
$259,664
84
08-12-104-010-0000
$75,444
125
08-12-113-018-0000
$0
85
08-12-107-003-0000
$2,989
126
08-12-113-019-0000
$0
86
08-12-107-004-0000
$3,285
127
08-12-113-021-0000
$210,144
87
08-12-107-006-0000
$0
128
08-12-114-001-0000
$239,023
88
08-12-107-007-0000
$0
129
08-12-114-002-0000
$55,561
89
08-12-107-008-0000
$0
130
08-12-114-003-0000
$133,945
90
08-12-107-018-0000
$333,563
131
08-12-114-004-0000
$43,729
91
08-12-107-019-0000
$129,590
132
08-12-114-005-0000
$408,948
92
08-12-107-020-0000
$686
133
08-12-115-001-0000
$0
93
08-12-107-021-0000
$0
134
08-12-115-005-0000
$35
94
08-12-107-022-0000
$26,770
135
08-12-119-016-0000
$125,086
95
08-12-108-015-0000
$56,025
136
08-12-119-029-0000
$161,300
96
08-12-108-031-0000
$296,678
137
08-12-120-003-0000
$157,548
97
08-12-108-032-0000
$21,660
138
08-12-120-018-0000
$104,600
98
08-12-109-025-0000
$188,265
139
08-12-120-027-0000
$76,949
99
08-12-109-026-0000
$129,937
140
08-12-120-028-0000
$207,404
100
08-12-109-028-0000
$1,893,007
141
08-12-120-029-0000
$315,145
101
08-12-109-029-0000
$0
142
08-12-120-031-0000
$0
102
08-12-109-030-0000
$188,970
143
08-12-120-036-0000
$644,285
103
08-12-110-031-0000
$737,032
144
08-12-121-057-0000
$259,845
104
08-12-112-001-0000
$128,939
145
08-12-121-061-0000
$137,222
105
08-12-112-002-0000
$219,687
146
08-12-121-063-0000
$83,657
106
08-12-112-003-0000
$117,646
147
08-12-122-003-0000
$154,357
107
08-12-112-004-0000
$0
148
08-12-122-015-0000
$463,188
108
08-12-112-005-0000
$0
149
08-12-122-016-0000
$300,673
109
08-12-112-006-0000
$0
150
08-12-122-017-0000
$453,642
110
08-12-112-007-0000
$0
151
08-12-122-019-0000
$226,462
111
08-12-112-008-0000
$0
152
08-12-122-030-0000
$82,048
112
08-12-112-011-0000
$155,008
153
08-12-122-031-0000
$564,388
113
08-12-112-012-0000
$167,507
154
08-12-122-034-0000
$0
114
08-12-112-031-0000
$97,526
155
08-12-122-036-1007
$460,095
115
08-12-113-001-0000
$253,505
156
08-12-122-036-1008
$172,414
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 52
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 66 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA Appendix
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 67 of 31
Parcel Identification
2015 Equalized
Parcel Identification
2015 Equalized
Record
Number
Assessed Value
Record
Number
Assessed Value
157
08-12-122-036-1009
$103,994
198
08-12-403-006-0000
$25,201
158
08-12-122-037-1001
$143,944
199
08-12-403-007-0000
$25,428
159
08-12-122-037-1002
$181,690
200
08-12-403-008-0000
$73,464
160
08-12-122-037-1003
$74,643
201
08-12-403-009-0000
$51,892
161
08-12-214-061-0000
$30,330
202
08-12-403-010-0000
$107,741
162
08-12-214-062-0000
$164,636
203
08-12-403-011-0000
$236,581
163
08-12-214-063-0000
$49,180
204
08-12-403-014-0000
$55,945
164
08-12-214-065-0000
$247,840
205
08-12-403-016-0000
$412,035
165
08-12-214-066-0000
$319,417
206
08-12-404-004-0000
$14,100
166
08-12-221-002-0000
$95,655
207
08-12-404-011-0000
$50,616
167
08-12-221-003-0000
$45,570
208
08-12-404-012-0000
$50,616
168
08-12-221-004-0000
$45,570
209
08-12-404-013-0000
$25,519
169
08-12-221-005-0000
$41,797
210
08-12-404-014-0000
$25,519
170
08-12-221-006-0000
$51,219
211
08-12-404-015-0000
$101,694
171
08-12-221-007-0000
$51,219
212
08-12-404-019-0000
$79,636
172
08-12-221-008-0000
$25,209
213
08-12-404-020-0000
$79,636
173
08-12-221-009-0000
$150,100
214
08-12-404-021-0000
$53,194
174
08-12-221-010-0000
$121,681
215
08-12-404-022-0000
$93,566
175
08-12-221-011-0000
$105,070
216
08-12-404-023-0000
$106,569
176
08-12-221-012-0000
$197,885
217
08-12-404-024-0000
$122,348
177
08-12-222-017-0000
$221,664
218
08-12-404-025-0000
$112,720
178
08-12-222-020-0000
$74,320
219
08-12-404-026-0000
$114,102
179
08-12-222-021-0000
$74,705
220
08-12-404-027-0000
$102,027
180
08-12-222-022-0000
$4,395
221
08-12-404-029-0000
$246,097
181
08-12-222-023-0000
$4,395
222
08-12-405-018-0000
$40,777
182
08-12-222-024-0000
$56,948
223
08-12-405-019-0000
$32,670
183
08-12-222-025-0000
$119,970
224
08-12-405-020-0000
$191,225
184
08-12-222-026-0000
$60,041
225
08-12-405-021-0000
$35,157
185
08-12-222-027-0000
$203,185
226
08-12-405-022-0000
$28,790
186
08-12-223-021-0000
$28,246
227
08-12-405-023-0000
$4,608
187
08-12-223-022-0000
$36,809
228
08-12-405-024-0000
$64,770
188
08-12-223-023-0000
$70,459
229
08-12-405-025-0000
$72,186
189
08-12-223-024-0000
$69,178
230
08-12-405-026-0000
$72,186
190
08-12-223-025-0000
$51,686
231
08-12-405-027-0000
$72,186
191
08-12-223-026-0000
$109,707
232
08-12-405-028-0000
$72,186
192
08-12-223-027-0000
$99,447
233
08-12-405-029-0000
$72,186
193
08-12-223-028-0000
$86,796
234
08-12-405-038-0000
$259,274
194
08-12-223-034-0000
$211,505
235
08-12-405-039-0000
$371,199
195
08-12-223-035-0000
$265,644
236
08-12-500-001-0000
$0
196
08-12-227-017-0000
$313,503
237
08-11-201-030-0000
$648,019
197
08-12-403-005-0000
$25,153
238
08-11-202-001-0000
$77,432
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS 53
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 67 of 31
Village of Mount Prospect, Prospect and Main RPA
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
54
Appendix
2015 Equalized
Assessed Value
$1,169,521
$259,947
$37,157,840
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 68 of 31
Parcel Identification
2015 Equalized
Parcel Identification
Record
Number
Assessed Value
Record
Number
239
08-11-202-002-0000
$75,030
245
03-34-331-019-0000
240
08-12-115-006-0000
$542,063
246
03-34-329-016-0000
241
08-12-116-006-0000
$240,168
TOTAL
242
08-12-305-002-0000
$0
243
08-12-305-003-0000
$0
244
08-12-400-003-0000
$0
SB FRIEDMAN I DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS
54
Appendix
2015 Equalized
Assessed Value
$1,169,521
$259,947
$37,157,840
www.sbfriedman.com
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 68 of 31
Illsilii , � .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .. .... .... ....
N -t� a any a}}!ppe� r3 •y a0i
I--_
D CL
N �LL to
CL
y9ect Rd _ P2i loadsoad lW N oI H
U �o /�
IL
Q
T— S mi'?
u
a IS aQlV S
L
Q. Po IS a6aoa0 S_ U 0
N CL (1)
0M
O IS PaeMP3 N IS PaeMP3 S a =
Q o
LL I
S sog N o IS s!nol S � �0
m(oo
af �o,.r Q rn
0 a
IS we!ILM N ¢ is we!II!M S CL
F-
LU
Co
in w lS uaMO S _ m o
Z U
w
w is Ioo4oS S
,rr
O0 }S w13 N IS w13 S,.ro
.�..
L CL
3S a!deW N----------------
li
r
tS uosaaw3 N' IS uosaaw3S ° N
08
w
LL
IS u!eW N is u!eW S 0
IS aIIMN „ti'" // 3S a!!!M S
u/� 0
O IS au!d N I
3S au!d S m
�
any tsan4w13 S 3� P2i3san4w13 S
O
any tsanyw13 �
/l
any 2i N a^y a�10 1 S
ant{ i
lH S
.isn
_any !snl!H S
_0
_ _ at/ ^ellodeM S_ _ _ S Wa Pella Ave O co
Xany nna!nne / o
O
W // Q o Co
anytsaaod m c anyeloPUeOS LL Cu
J ~ E
SNaWaTaAveN (D Co
Z LL
CLCU -0
S Cathy 2 any unmE) oaS S a� � p) .
O S� o W Dresser�� 0 �0
L
LV NU 111 00 OAAL
S O H W
+a�-U'
�+ U CIE
5 IS J91se3ue-1 N cJ Lancaster Ave a)
0
U
133211S NOS83V43
illum
133211S NIVV4 69 31
zl.
all
rs
1332115 3-111
S 3
133 Nld 13 3 HiS 3 N ld
133d1S isgin—HH-57
3nN3AVlis 'If 'I.
z
3nN3AV 3001H jz 3nN3AV VMO -1 z
3nN3AV IsmlH
3nN3AVV 113dVM
3nN3AVV1008V0
3AViS380-i
0
z
LU
CD
LU
-i
I
1332115 KV1111M
1332115 N3M0
"7
133diS 100HOS
ir an, x—r—
X33diS H13
o
iaQ 133211S 3ldVW
133211S NOS83V43
illum
133211S NIVV4 69 31
zl.
all
rs
1332115 3-111
S 3
133 Nld 13 3 HiS 3 N ld
133d1S isgin—HH-57
3nN3AVlis 'If 'I.
z
3nN3AV 3001H jz 3nN3AV VMO -1 z
3nN3AV IsmlH
3nN3AVV 113dVM
3nN3AVV1008V0
3AViS380-i
0
z
LU
CD
LU
-i
I
I
Conceptual Prospect and Main TIF FAQ
October 12, 2016
The Village of Mount Prospect has prioritized the vibrancy of the downtown district in the Strategic Plan.
Earlier this year the Village retained S.B. Friedman Development Advisors to evaluate key metrics in the
downtown related to age of structures, obsolescence, vacancy and values. The Prospect and Main TIF
Eligibility Report and Redevelopment plan can be viewed at
www.mouMainTIF. The report confirms that the proposed redevelopment
project area (RPA) does qualify under the TIF Act as a conservation area. After receiving the report,
Village staff has been meeting with our partner units of local government in Mount Prospect to
determine whether the TIF could be a source of funds to assist in infrastructure and other
improvements. The approach being analyzed is an early retirement of TIF 1 and a return of all value to
impacted taxing districts. A new TIF boundary could be approved in January 2017 including properties
that have not yet seen reinvestment. A map contrasting the two boundaries is attached. This TIF inquiry
is a work in progress and the Village will ensure a transparent review process throughout all stages.
Here are a few frequently asked questions related to the conceptual Prospect and Main TIF:
1) Why does the Village need another TIF downtown?
While TIF 1 has helped spur the addition of more than 450 new residential units and 40,000
square feet of new retail space in the downtown over the past two decades, key potential
redevelopment sites have not yet redeveloped, such as the "Small Triangle", Central Plaza, the
southwest corner of Main Street and Evergreen Avenue and the Parenti-Raffaelli properties.
The Village's 2013 Downtown Plan calls for more mixed-use, transit -oriented development in
the downtown area, on both sides of the Metra tracks. Many, if not all, of those redevelopment
opportunities may need TIF assistance to be financially feasible. Further, the plan notes that "TIF
is one of the few funding mechanisms available to local governments and has proven to be very
effective in spurring redevelopment and public improvements within communities." To the
extent that the Village wants to continue to pursue the goals outlined in the 2013 Downtown
Plan, the TIF tool should be available to use on a project -by -project basis.
In addition, the Village has initiated discussions with School District 57 and the Mount Prospect
Park District to identify ways that the new TIF could assist them with paying for infrastructure
and operational/programming improvements on their properties located within the proposed
TIF district.
2) Concern for Schools and Park Districts: TIF diverts increases in property taxes within the
TIF district away from taxing bodies such as schools for a period of 23 years. This means
schools will be deprived of the natural market increases on equalized assessed valuation
(EA V), funds that schools need to operate effectively.
Tax Increment Financing ("TIF") benefits school districts by increasing the value of properties
within a TIF district through redevelopment and reinvestment that would otherwise not occur
due to market conditions. A TIF district does not deprive schools of funds to operate. As tax -
capped taxing bodies, school districts will continue to receive their full annual budget levy
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 71 of 31
amount with or without a TIF district in place. The creation of a TIF district has no bearing on
school districts' abilities to meet their annual budget obligations, and strengthens school
districts' long term financial stability by encouraging and undertaking redevelopment of
underperforming properties that will pay more in property taxes after redevelopment.
For example, within the existing TIF district, the Village encouraged and assisted in the
development of over $18,000,000 in new property value growth through high quality projects
such as the Clocktower Condominiums, Residences at Village Centre, Lofts and Shops at Village
Centre, the Emerson and Founders Row. As explained below, this new property value growth
will be available to the school districts to levy against going forward.
3) TIF 1 did enough and the Village should now leave the downtown area alone and let the
market take care of redevelopment.
The total Equalized Assessed Valuation ("EAV") of property in the proposed TIF district has
declined during the last five years, while the EAV in the rest of the Village has either grown or
not declined as fast in most years:
Given this history, which shows that the property in the proposed TIF district is lagging behind
the Village with regard to its EAV growth, should the Village elect to do nothing, and these
trends continue, the tax burden on the rest of the Village will increase as the tax base in the
proposed TIF district continues to stagnate relative to the rest of the Village.
It should be noted that the Village will be releasing all properties that have been redeveloped in
the current TIF district back to all of the other taxing bodies on December 31, 2016, meaning
that $18 million of new growth will be available to the other taxing bodies to add to their levies.
These properties have increased in value by over six (6) times their original EAVs, while the
remainder of the current TIF district has stagnated, demonstrating the benefit of how a TIF
investment can have a significant positive impact on the community and the other taxing
bodies.
4) The Village is going to use the new downtown TIF to give away tax dollars to developers.
The step under consideration now is to create the TIF district. Subsequently, assuming the TIF
district is approved by the Village Board, should a development project come forward and
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 72 of 31
request Village TIF assistance it would be subject to scrutiny by Village staff, experts, the Village
Board, an annual audit, and the annual meeting of the TIF district's Joint Review Board,
comprised of representatives from the taxing bodies. The Village only intends to provide the
release of TIF funds to a development project if the project will (1) support key policy goals of
the Downtown Plan AND (2) the project will not go forward without TIF assistance.
5) The TIF will create new residential developments that will add students to our Schools.
The Redevelopment Plan for the proposed TIF district does include higher density multi -family
residential to be constructed to benefit the overall downtown area. These developments have
not historically created service demands from new students. The TIF Act provides a
compensation formula for the school districts based on actual student demand to ensure that
funds are allocated if new students are created.
If you would like additional information or have questions or concerns, please contact Village Manager
Mike Cassady at mcassadymountprospect.orR. You can also be included on the TIF Interested Parties
Registration by clicking on the attached link www.mountprospect.orgITIFlnteresteclPartiesRe istration.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 73 of 31
Item V.: DOWNTOWN INTERSECTIONS STUDY
Department: Public Works Department
Information:
Earlier this year, Public Works staff met with IDOT representatives to discuss the traffic
signal timing and state of the equipment in the downtown. From that discussion, IDOT
agreed to perform a detailed Signal Coordination and Timing (SCAT) study of the
interconnected system that includes:
• Main Street (IL Route 83) & Northwest Highway
• Main Street (IL Route 83) & Prospect Avenue
• Northwest Highway & Emerson Street
• Main Street (IL Route 83) & Central Road
• Central Road & Northwest Highway
• Central Road & Prospect Avenue
Work included collecting current traffic count data, analyzing the system using a
computer software program, implementing new signal timings, and evaluating/adjusting
the signal timings based on observations. This was accomplished by Sam Schwartz
Engineering of Itasca, Illinois through a contract with IDOT. Separate from the
contracted work with IDOT, the Village hired Sam Schwartz Engineering simultaneously
to perform additional services of the downtown traffic signal system that included
evaluating the train station location, comparing the signal timing & equipment to similar
intersections at nearby muncipalities, analyzing the closure of Prospect Avenue at Main
Street on the traffic signal system, and assessing a Traffic Management Center similar
to the Lake County PASSAGE System.
Sam Schwartz Engineering recently completed both the IDOT SCAT study and Village
study. Hard copy reports are available for review. Below is a bullet point summary of
both studies.
IDOT SCAT Study
• Morning, midday & evening timing programs created
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 74 of 31
• Typical cycle length is 160 — 170 seconds
• Half cycles at Northwest Hwy & Emerson St and Main St & Central Rd implemented
to reduce delays
• Main St & Central Rd runs uncoordinated ("free") from other signals during peak train
frequency in the afternoon to reduce delays
• Coordinated phase (road that will receive remaining green time not needed by
intersecting street during cycle) changed from Northwest Hwy to Main St
• Vehicle delays reduced 17 — 86% within system
• Post -observations by consultant resulted in minor timing adjustments
• New timing programs have been in-place since June with no observed adverse
impact or complaints
Village Study
• A relocated train station between Central Rd and Main St may allow the railroad
gates at Main St to release for outbound trains but the railroad gates at Central Rd
will remain down. The railroad gates at Main St and Emerson St will in all likelihood
remain down for inbound trains.
• A relocated train station east of Emerson St may allow the railroad gates at Main St
and Emerson St to release for inbound trains. However, the train station may need
to be several blocks east of the downtown to allow the railroad gates at Main St and
Emerson St to release for outbound trains. Further coordination is required with
Union Pacific.
• The presence of a traffic signal at Main St & Prospect Av increases the number of
signal phases as well as the cycle length to allow for safe passage across the
railroad tracks. The downtown Mount Prospect system has 10 signal phases
compared to 8, 5 & 6 at the downtown Arlington Heights, Des Plaines and La Grange
systems, respectively. Even so, the amount of time during peak periods the railroad
gates are down in Mount Prospect is comparable to the amount of time in Arlington
Heights and Des Plaines. The railroad gates in downtown La Grange are actually
down 27% longer during peak periods compared to Mount Prospect.
• The controller equipment in the traffic signal cabinets is identical to the equipment in
Arlington Heights and similar to the equipment in Des Plaines. It is in good condition
and has the ability to be maintained for many years. IDOT has hundreds of the same
controllers in use today in the area. Installing a next generation controller would not
reduce vehicle delays or make the system more efficient.
• Removing the traffic signal at Main St & Prospect Av would reduce vehicle delays at
Main St & Northwest Hwy as well as at Central Rd & Northwest Hwy. The half cycles
at Main St & Central Rd as well as at Northwest Hwy & Emerson St may have to be
eliminated resulting in a slight increase in vehicle delay at both intersections. There
would be limited access to and from Prospect Av at Main St impacting local
businesses.
• Creating a Transportation Management Center for the three traffic signal systems in
Mount Prospect (downtown, Randhurst area, Mount Prospect Plaza area) would
require significant infrastructure costs at the intersections and at Public Works. Initial
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 75 of 31
construction costs could exceed $1.3 million with an annual maintenance cost of
$110,000. The center would require a minimum of 20 staff -hours per week to
operate. In addition, it is anticipated IDOT would require a transfer of ownership and
maintenance to the Village for the three traffic signal systems.
A representative from Sam Schwartz Engineering is prepared to present the findings of
both the IDOT SCAT study and Village study.
Alternatives:
These reports are presented for informational purposes only. No Village Board
action is necessary.
Budget Impact:
There is no budget impact.
Recommendation:
SUPPORTS THE FOLLOWING STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS:
INFRASTRUCTURE: Well designed, well maintained public spaces and
facilities, COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS: Vibrant downtown and commercial areas
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type Upload Date
Attachment A DT
D INTERSECTIONS Cover Memo 11/2/2016
SCAT STUDY
REPORT
ATTACHMENT B
DT
D INTERSECTIONS Cover Memo 11/2/2016
VOMP
ANCILLARY
STUDY
File Name
SCAT_study_-_J une_2016. p df
sam_schwartz final_report.pdf
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 76 of 31
ECONOLITE #197 - U.S. 14 @ IL 83
MOUNT PROSPECT, IL
jjjj) ��� li / j % /I G
11111111F ��� 0 A ���jjjjjjjjjj)
S ��� G A C 0 0 1 �,,Jjlll / �%, iiiiiiiij ��� ��� ���
PREPARED FOR
Final Report
For
SCAT 2013
Work Order 172
Econolite Master 197
US 14 @ IL 83 / Prospect Ave.
June 2016
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 78 of 31
Table of Contents
SECTION 1: FINAL REPORT
Introduction.................................................................................................................
1
Methodology................................................................................................................
1
Evaluation.....................................................................................................................
4
Measures of Effectiveness............................................................................................
5
EmissionsAnalysis.......................................................................................................
8
Conclusion..................................................................................................................
10
FIGURES: Maps, System Overview, and Controller Sequence Diagrams
SECTION 2: SYSTEM DETECTOR COUNTS
SECTION 3: SYNCHRO ANALYSIS
SECTION 4: SPEED AND DELAY STUDIES
SECTION 5: IMPLEMENTED TIMINGS
SECTION 6: ELECTRONIC FILES
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 79 of 31
INTRODUCTION
Signal Coordination and Timing Study Overview
Sam Schwartz Engineering completed a Signal Coordination and Timing Study for Work
Order #172 on Illinois Department of Transportation's Job No. D-91-109-13. The purpose
of the study was to implement optimized signal timings on Econolite Zone #197 in the
Village of Mount Prospect, IL
System Description & Location
The subjects of this Signal Coordination and Timing Study are US 14 (Northwest Hwy.),
IL 83 (Main St.), and Central Rd. in downtown Mount Prospect. The speed limits on US
14, IL 83, and Central Rd. vary from 30 to 35 mph.
A total of four intersections were optimized on this system:
US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) @ Central Rd.
US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) @ IL 83 (Main St.) / Prospect Ave.
US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) @ Emerson St.
IL 83 (Main St.) @ Central Rd.
The Controller Sequence & System Overview charts immediately follow this report.
METHODOLOGY
This section describes the four -step process used by Sam Schwartz Engineering (SSE)
to develop the optimal timing plans used for this Signal Coordination and Timing Project.
The final step, evaluation is covered in the "Emissions Analysis" tab.
Data Collection
The data collection portion of the study involved acquisition of all current available data
from IDOT files which included intersection geometry, signalization plans, controller timings,
phase diagrams and system detector diagrams. Field surveys were conducted to verify
phase orientation and system detectors and to document any observed discrepancies from
IDOT standards. To model existing corridor conditions, turning movement counts (TMC's)
were used from a previous 2007 SCAT Work Order. Other data related to geometry, park-
ing, bus activity, etc. were collected at key intersections (see "Turning Movement Counts"
tab). The TMC's were summarized to develop design hour volumes (DHV's) for the morn-
ing (6:30-9:30 AM), midday (11:00-1:00 PM) and evening (3:30-6:30 PM) peak periods.
The percentage of trucks and right -on -red movements were identified for the peak hours as
well as the number of buses per hour per approach.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 80 of 31
Data Analysis and Timing Plan Development
Based on the summarized data, each intersection was evaluated individually and as part of
the signal system for the three identified peak traffic periods. SYNCHROTm 8.0, which
incorporates the 2010 update to the Highway Capacity Manual, was utilized for individual
intersection analysis to determine; the appropriate cycle length, identify proposed phasing
patterns, determine level -of -service (LOS) for isolated operation and calculate the
saturation flow rate per movement. "Ideal" saturation flow rates of 1900 passenger cars per
hour of green per lane (pcphgpl) for through lanes and turning lanes were used to calculate
the saturation flow rates for each movement.
SYNCHROTm 8.0 was used to develop optimal timing splits and offsets for each
intersection within the signal system at all other times. In addition to identifying a
progression bandwidth along the arterial roadway, the program also calculated the delay
time associated with the turning movements and cross -street approaches that were not
addressed within the progression band. The standard 111, 211, and 311 Econolite
program designations were used for the MD, AM, and PM programs respectively.
Implementation
The resulting information from the SYNCHROTm 8.0 evaluations was used to develop
the implementation plans. Cycle lengths, splits, and offsets were taken directly from the
SYNCHROTm 8.0 runs. Time -of -Day plans, which are used as a backup to Traffic
Responsive operations, were developed by evaluating the seven-day system detector
counts and determining the appropriate times for changes in both cycle lengths and
splits. The new timings were implemented to the Econolite Closed Loop Arterial Traffic
Signal Control Systems by means of an in -office computer via telephone lines. After the
initial implementation procedure was completed, field observations were conducted to
assess system operations. Fine-tuning adjustments to the implemented phase splits
and offsets were made to correct any observed adverse operating conditions
Traffic Responsive Programming
Finally, the system detector counts were evaluated and used to develop volume and
occupancy factors for each system detector, as well as to determine volume level changes
and smoothing factors for use in Traffic Responsive operation.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the Traffic Responsive Operation, a comparison was used
between the Time -of -Day plans and Traffic Responsive Operation programs. By
comparing the pre-programmed Time -of Day plan with the Traffic Responsive Operation
changes for a typical weekday, one can get an indication of how well the Traffic
Responsive Operation is performing. For a typical weekday it can be expected that the
timing changes for Traffic Responsive operation should approximate those of the pre-
programmed Time -of -Day operation without excessive timing changes or oscillation. For
weekends and holidays, the Traffic Responsive operation should also accommodate the
changes in traffic flow without oscillation. Shown below is a summary of the Traffic
Responsive Operation changes versus the implemented Time -of -Day plans for a typical 24-
hour weekday period and a 24-hour Saturday period. The comparisons show how closely
the Traffic Responsive changes follow the Time -of -Day plans. It can be seen that the
2
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 81 of 31
Traffic Responsive Operation does not oscillate during normal weekday traffic and that it
responds more efficiently to off-peak and weekend traffic flows than the Time -of -Day plans.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 82 of 31
TOD PLANS VS. TRP
ECONOLITE ZONE 197
Average Weekday
Time
Traffic
Time
Of Day
Time
Responsive
600
211
540
211
900
111
950
111
1500
311
1610
311
1830
111
1910
111
2100
FREE
2130
FREE
Average Saturday
700
111
845
111
2100
FREE
2045
FREE
KEY: 111 - MIDDAY/OFF-PEAK DIAL
211 - AM PEAK DIAL
311 - PM PEAK DIAL
FREE - NON -COORDINATED
* Note:
TOD Steps are at 900 and 2000 respectively on Sunday
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 82 of 31
Evaluation
To develop Measures of Effectiveness (MOE's) for the arterial, speed/delay studies were
conducted within the corridor before and after implementation. The speed/delay studies
were used to determine the running speed, average speed, seconds of delay, fuel
consumption and number of stops for both conditions during each of the three established
peak hour periods. The speed/delay studies only addressed conditions associated with the
through movements on the arterial roadway.
The speed/delay data was evaluated using PC -TRAVEL. The program calculated delay,
stops and fuel consumption from the speed/delay runs. Traffic volume data from detector
loops and the MOE's from the speed delay runs were used to determine total system
MOE's for the three peak periods. This analysis was conducted for both the before and
after implementation scenarios. Once the differences between the before and after MOE's
were established, the dollar values were assigned to determine the overall daily benefits
which were converted to annual savings (or additional costs).
The values assigned to the total system MOE's are listed below:
' 1.25 persons per vehicle
' Total Delay- $16.79 per person per hour = $20.99 per vehicle per hour
2 Fuel Consumption - $2.25 per gallon
' Total Stops - $0.042 per stop
System Implementation Results
Three timing plans were implemented. The coordinated phases at the railroad crossing
of IL 83 & US 14 were changed to favor IL 83 as part of this study. The coordinated
cycle lengths in the AM peak period are 170 seconds, 160 seconds in the off peak, and
170 seconds in the PM peak period. Half cycles of 85 or 80 seconds were used at US
14 & Emerson St. (during AM, MD, and PM) and IL 83 & Central Rd (during AM & MD).
Because volumes are too large, IL 83 & Central runs free during the PM Peak when train
preemptions are frequent. Volumes are directional on the system. In the AM peak
period the predominant flows are eastbound on US 14, eastbound on Central Rd., and
southbound on IL 83. During the PM rush hour the predominant flows are westbound on
US 14, westbound on Central Rd., and northbound on IL 83.
Source: TTI Urban Mobility Report December 2012 — Texas A&M Transportation Institute
2 Average observed gasoline price (unleaded fuel), Chicago Metro Area, June 2016
M
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 83 of 31
Measures of Effectiveness
The results of the speed -delay studies exemplify the benefits of traffic signal system
coordination. As seen in Tables 1 and 2 below, travel time was reduced in both directions
in all three periods studied when compared pre-existing conditions. These study results
produced a benefit cost ratio seen in Tables 3 and 4 on the following pages. Complete
details of the speed delay studies can be found in Section 4 (Speed -Delay Studies).
TABLE 1
SPEED/DELAY SUMMARY
US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) - (Central Rd. To Emerson St.)
Condition
Travel
Delay
Stops
Average
Time
Seed
E/B
Pre -imp.*
168.3
113.3
1.3
9.8
AM
Post -imp.**
84.7
39
0.3
17.4
PEAK
W/B
Pre -imp.
148
94.7
1.3
10.8
Post -imp.
1 132.3
1 78.7
1 1.7
1 12
E/B
Pre -imp.
180.3
126.7
2.0
9.3
MIDDAY
Post -imp.
87.7
31.7
1.0
19.1
PEAK
W/B
Pre -imp.
98.3
46.7
0.7
15.6
Post -imp
112.7
61.3
1.0
13.6
E/B
Pre -imp.
134.3
78.3
0.7
12.3
PM
Post -imp.
81.7
26
0.7
20.3
PEAK
W/B
Pre -imp.
176.7
123.7
1.7
8.9
Post -imp.
119
67.3
1.0
13.2
*pre -implementation
"post -implementation
Is
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 84 of 31
TABLE 2
SPEED/DELAY SUMMARY
IL 83 (Main St.) - (Prospect Ave. To Central Rd.)
Condition
Travel
Delay
Stops
Average
Time
Speed
N/B
Pre -imp.*
69
41.3
0.7
11.9
AM
Post -imp.**
51.3
23.3
1.0
16
PEAK
S/B
Pre -imp.
57.7
30.7
0.7
13.6
Post -imp.
30.3
1 4.3
1 0.3
1 25.8
N/B
Pre -imp.
55.7
28.7
1.0
14.8
MIDDAY
Post -imp.
35
7.7
0.3
23.5
PEAK
S/B
Pre -imp.
81
54.7
1.0
9.7
Post -imp
37
10
0.3
21.3
N/B
Pre -imp.
61
33
0.7
13.4
PM
Post -imp.
47.7
19.3
1.3
17.2
PEAK
S/B
Pre -imp.
98.7
71.7
1.0
8
Post -imp.
37
10
0.3
21.4
*pre -implementation
"post -implementation
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 85 of 31
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 86 of 31
TABLE 3
MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS (MOE) ANALYSIS
MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS (MOE) ANALYSIS
MVRAP
MVRAP
IL 83 (Main St.) - (Prospect Ave. to Central Rd.)
US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) - (Central Rd. to Emerson St.)
Fuel
Fuel
Consumption
Consumption
Stops
Delay
al
al
veh-hr
veh-hr
AM
54.0
Pre -imp
134.9
4417
98.6
PEAK
1809
Post -imp
111.0
3288
54.7
PERIOD
19.8
Diff
23.9
1129
43.9
MIDDAY
PEAK
Pre -imp
189.1
7020
125.0
PEAK
Diff
Post -imp
150.3
4994
62.8
PERIOD
84.0
Diff
38.8
2026
62.3
PM
2938
Pre -imp
132.6
3943
93.0
PEAK
43.0
Post -imp
100.2
2824
42.5
PERIOD
COST
Diff
32.5
1119
50.5
29:1
ANNUAL BENEFIT
$957,216
COST
$26,000
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
37:1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 86 of 31
TABLE 4
MEASURE OF EFFECTIVENESS (MOE) ANALYSIS
MVRAP
IL 83 (Main St.) - (Prospect Ave. to Central Rd.)
Fuel
Consumption
Stops
Delay
al
veh-hr
AM
Pre -imp
54.0
2170
30.1
PEAK
Post -imp
40.9
1809
10.3
PERIOD
Diff
13.1
362
19.8
MIDDAY
Pre -imp
112.5
5768
70.0
PEAK
Post -imp
68.1
1730
14.5
PERIOD
Diff
44.4
4038
55.6
PM
Pre -imp
84.0
3354
58.3
PEAK
Post -imp
53.2
2938
15.4
PERIOD
Diff
30.8
416
43.0
ANNUAL BENEFIT
$750,015
COST
$26,000
BENEFIT/COST RATIO
29:1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 86 of 31
Emission Analysis
Consistent with the improvements in vehicle flow are similar improvements in
emissions as shown in the tables 5 and 6 below.
TABLE 5
VEHICLE EMISSION SUMMARY
US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) - (Central Rd. To Emerson St.)
BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION
HC
CO
NOx
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
AM PEAK
E/B
3,289
29,366
1,066
PERIOD
W/B
1 2,651
22,988
895
MIDDAY PEAK
E/B
5,443
46,431
1,869
PERIOD
W/B
3,198
26,404
1,636
PM PEAK
E/B
2,697
23,719
955
PERIOD
W/B
3,313
27,044
1,303
AFTER
IMPLEMENTATION
HC
CO
NOx
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
AM PEAK
E/B
2,291
20,865
1,085
PERIOD
W/B
2,788
22,413
1,305
MIDDAY PEAK
E/B
3,772
30,004
2,237
PERIOD
W/B
3,156
26,948
1,357
PM PEAK
E/B
2,157
18,739
1,178
PERIOD
W/B
2,449
20,880
1,109
PERCENT
REDUCTION
HC
CO
NOx
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
AM PEAK
E/B
30%
29%
-2%
PERIOD
W/B
-5%
3%
-46%
MIDDAY PEAK
E/B
31%
35%
-20%
PERIOD
W/B
1%
-2%
17%
PM PEAK
E/B
20%
21%
-23%
PERIOD
W/B
26%
23%
15%
ANNUAL DIFFERENCE
HC
CO
NOx
(ton/yr)
(ton/yr)
(ton/yr)
AM PEAK PERIOD
-0.2
-3
0.1
MIDDAY PEAK PERIOD
-0.5
-5
0.0
PM PEAK PERIOD
-0.4
-3
0.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 87 of 31
TABLE 6
VEHICLE EMISSION SUMMARY
IL 83 (Main St.) - (Prospect Ave. To Central Rd.)
BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION
HC
CO
NOx
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
AM PEAK
N/B
520
4,440
214
PERIOD
S/B
777
5,756
436
MIDDAY PEAK
N/B
863
6,610
415
PERIOD
S/B
1,903
13,301
1,035
PM PEAK
N/B
708
5,701
340
PERIOD
S/B
1,319
10,091
600
AFTER IMPLEMENTATION
HC
CO
NOx
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
AM PEAK
N/B
440
3,449
231
PERIOD
S/B
554
4,665
383
MIDDAY PEAK
N/B
533
4,839
242
PERIOD
S/B
1,037
7,530
669
PM PEAK
N/B
607
4,344
347
PERIOD
S/B
680
5,187
446
PERCENT REDUCTION
HC
CO
NOx
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
(grams/day)
AM PEAK
N/B
15%
22%
-8%
PERIOD
S/B
29%
19%
12%
MIDDAY PEAK
N/B
38%
27%
42%
PERIOD
S/B
45%
43%
35%
PM PEAK
N/B
14%
24%
-2%
PERIOD
S/B
48%
49%
26%
ANNUAL
DIFFERENCE
HC
CO
NOx
(ton/yr)
(ton/yr)
(ton/yr)
AM PEAK PERIOD
-0.1
-1
0.0
MIDDAY PEAK PERIOD
-0.3
-2
-0.2
PM PEAK PERIOD
-0.2
-2
0.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 88 of 31
CONCLUSION
Sam Schwartz Engineering optimized four intersections on US 14 & IL 83 in the Village of
Mount Prospect for Work Order 172 on our SCAT 2013 contract. Travel time reductions
were achieved for the both arterials in each travelling directions on US 14 & IL 83 during all
three timing programs with one exception, the westbound US 14 study during the Midday
period. The Traffic Responsive Program responds to traffic by setting the system to free
operation at more appropriate times, as traffic volumes drop on the system relatively early
in the evening. As shown in the Tables 3 & 4 of the report, a total benefit: cost ratio of 66:1
was calculated for the Work Order.
Due to the complex phasing at the US 14 / IL 83 / Prospect Ave. intersection, the controller
spends much of its time in free operation or transition after railroad preemptions. This
dramatically affects progression to and from other signals on both US 14 and IL 83. While
there is not a solution to this problem, another factor that sets the controller free and into
transition is the phase 12 pedestrian movement across IL 83 @ Prospect Ave. It is our
recommendation that IDOT consider installing separate pedestrian buttons for this
pedestrian phase 12 as it is currently activated along with pedestrian phases 4 and 8 when
buttons are hit on the southwest and southeast quadrant of the IL 83 & Prospect Ave.
intersection.
10
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 89 of 31
OJ
Z pU
zU)
A
W
❑ ❑ O❑Q DO
Lo r
r r El � CN
Q
m❑� CN ❑�®
M �
m❑cN r r r 00
El❑❑r �0
,r --N Q
U U
CY)
ch
0
O
rn
(1)
rn
m
CL
T
00
0
to
T
rU
N(1)
o
U
N
U
N
N
0
O
Cl)
LO
ti00
L
O
Cl)
O)
U)
LO
O
r
Cn
U)
O
00
cc
r
Cn
U)
LO
00
O
r
Cn
j
>>
�
Z
N
=C
C
N
(U
J
v
T
U
r
r
N
E
Co
r
r
r
E
Co
r
r
Ch
E
Co
0
CL
o
0
0
Z
E
U
W
c
o
Q
O
Co
U
o
O
W
co
N
ch
0
O
rn
(1)
rn
m
CL
T
to
T
o
U
J
L
N
O
Z
E
U
W
c
o
T
O
>
U
o
O
W
co
N
J
U
O
J
Cp
L
yo
N
Co
5�
L
`
>
®
O
ch
0
O
rn
(1)
rn
m
CL
T
LU
J
U o
N C C
O J C N N
N
E (D > >
O U O
zZ 0 `� N
0 L O E 0
j a z m
c
Q
N
d � �
� a
C
d
£811 U
7-
04
co U d
d
Be,
LU
J
}aaa}g UOsaaw3
I M
I o
M U
� I c
C6
N 66+6+Z+9+9+Z+6
I v
66+6+Z+9+9+b+Z+6
O
N
C
C
CD
N C C
J c N N
N E
E N > >
co > O U O
0 N E
0 L O E 0
j a z m
c
a
d
c
d
Q
U
N
Q
Ul
O
a
00'
System Detector Counts
For
SCAT 2013
Work Order 172
Econolite Master 197
US 14 @ IL 83 / Prospect Ave.
June 2016
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 93 of 31
N O I- M 0 zr M M— N 7 M 0 M N 0 0 0 N 0 7 7O N 7 7 N M O I- W 7 N 7 M 0 0 O I- N
(O N N N (O (O Lf) I� r O r O N r M M M Lf) Lf) lo') I� Lf) Lf) (O (O I�
H �
W
0
r M M I� N N M M— O N N N M N 0 N 7 Lf) O N I- O N N N N O r ON O O 7 M O N I- M 0 O I- W
N Nm I- M M r N N O O N r M M M M 7 7 0 0 0 0 I- M
H �
W
0
7 0 M Lf) r 0— 0 0 — — — —— N Lo') O O O O I� M NN 0 O I� N N
N N Nm 0 m N N O O D 0 m W M M 7 lo') (O Lf) Lf) 7 Lf) (O
W
0
M O O N I� M N M M— 7 7 M 7 7 7 0 O r N 0 N N N M I- O N r N 0 0 0 O M M 0 0 7 7 7 M 7 M M M
N M 7 M M I— 0 7 0 7 N N N N O N N I— O r N r O O
W
0
N m M N 7 M N 7 0 I� N 7 N— 7 M N 7 (O 7M N N 0 0 7 N O M O M (O N O I� O M 7 lo') (O (O (O
N Nm M 0 m I� M M r M r W M 0 7 7 Lo') Lf) Lf) lo') (O (O I� M M
H
W
0
O r M M N M 7 M 7 7 M— N 7 M 0 M M 0 I� 0 I� O 0 7 I� 7 M M M (O
N N N M N 7 0 m m I- N O O
W
0
O_ N— m M O O N— O N O— O O O O N I— lo') 7 00 I� O M 0 N M 0 0 I� 7 0 I� 0 7 N M 0 I� 0 7 N M
N N Nm 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 7 M M M 7 M N Nm M M M 7 7
H
W
0
O M N 0 7— N N O Cl) N— 7 — 0 N 7 N CO lo') O N 7 N 0 0 lo') ON N N Cl) CO 0 7 I— CO O N lo') I- r O N
N N N Cl) Cl) (O Lf) (O (O I- O Co Lf) Loi 7o Lf) Lo') co m N I- Lf) 7 (O Lf)
W
0
N 7 0 (O 7 N 7— M M M M N N— 7 0 N 7 M M M O O N N N N I- N M N M 7 N I� N N O O O M M 7 N 0 M O
W
0
I� M— M M N M — — —— N— N N 7--- N M O 7 N M N M 7I- O M N M N N O O O M M O O D I- 0 7 I- 7
N Nm 7 7 0 7 7 0 0 M M 7 7 7 M 7 7 M 0 7 7
W
0
m N M N N m M O M M— N— M— 7 7 I� N M N M r N 07 7 M O O 0 7 M 0 0 M m 7 0 Nm 0 0
N Cl) 7 Lo') lo') Lf) (O (O (O Lo') (O N
W
0
0 0 N I— 7 0 N M— 0 7 M— N M 0 M M I- 7 O 0 M N N O O N O N 7 M I- I- M N N N 0 M N 7 0 7 O 0 N O
N M M M m m N O O
W
0
7 M N I� N O N— O M— M O— N 0 zr N N M M 0M 0 M 0 O M 0 M N N 7 M M O O NM 0 0 M
N N Cl) 7 Lf) 7 (O (O m I� W M M 0 0 0 M 7 0 7 7 7 N 7 7 0
W
0
M I� — M O — —— M N N M 7 7 0 I� r N N N Mr O r N r M O 7 0 O 7 M N M N 0 0 0 I� 0 0 M M I� W
N Nm 7 0 N N N I� r O O r r M M 7 7 7 0 7 M 7 7 7 7 0
W
0
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
H
W
0
M 0 M I� — 7— NM M— M M— NM N 77 M 0 � M 7 N 0 Lf) Lf) W M O r N 7 r M N 0 7 N M O O N?
� N N 7 M M 7 lo') 7 M lo') 7 7 Lo') M M lo') lo') 7 7 7 lo') lo')
W
0
0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0
N N N N M M M M 7 7 7 7 Lo') lo') lo') lo') (O (O (O (O I� r r r N N N N O O O O O O O O N
(O
(O
M
O
V
O)
N
O
m
11
7 N N N LO M N O N I- I` N O L(') O r L(') O O I- M W 12 LO LO 7 8 N N O O 7 0 O O N (O I- M O M M O
(O (O (O (O (O (O LO (O (O I� r O M O N N O � N M M 7 LO N � � O r r M M r L(') 7 7 7 7 LO M M N N M N � � � N
W
0
M7 NM N7 M N M (ON � I: rN N M O) N O) N
7 M
W
7 (O O
I� M T M 7 NL7 0O) 7 I0OIM 7 2 M NO M IO- M M� O n NO M IO- NI� O E N O N :7W NM NM MN NN� (�O �N--- O— �N m
W
0
M M I�7 0 IO- NO 7 0 N 0r 0 NN 0O 7 2 (O O NM O OM ON O MN 0 7 NN NO N 2 IN- N S Or N N S MO O7 O MM M O (O NN n O NN M
W
0
N IO- O rN M Or Or rN Mr MLO N O Nr IO- rr ro- M N M LO ON 7 IN- O7 7 NO Or Or LN O N O ON IM- r7 Om rN O rN MN MN0�M� O N
H
W
N I- M O
I� Or Or N T T O IM- Mr r02 rr O M Nr M M ON Or ON O Or ON 2 ON ON Or OrMOrO r m n O O M M
W
0
O (O 7 O7 M N O M N M (O LO N N ON N M I�N r7 7 Mr NOOIO-NOM) NLOMO7MMO NM NN NN NNN�N M 7 I� r r 0
H
W
O M r N N N M 7 0 M 0 7 M I� 0, M M N O I� N 7 7 0 LO N N M O 4 N 7 N M 0 0 7 M S N I- 7 7 � O)
(O LO (O 7 I� L(') r M O r r r O r r O r N r O N r M M M 7 7 7 7 7 7 M M M N N N
W
0
N O M- O N O N N 7 N 0) O 8 N 7 2 M N N I. M I. 2 7 0 0 E N N W O W I- N N N O M (O LO (O N l0 O
� 7 (O LO (O LO (O 7 I� L(') M L(') (O (O I� O O O O O W� O W O O r M L(') LO (O M 7 7 7 M M M M N N N � N
W
0
NI- N N O I�N 7 M 0 I� O M N
7 LO LO 7 M LO LO LO 7 7 7 LO LO (O N I� W M N r O r r r N N L(') 7 LO LO M M M M N N N N N N �
W
- N LO O -LO N r O O M 7 M O MI� -r .M O N O OLO M M 7 0LO E 7 0 LO O -7 7 no
OM IM- 7 MO O I -NN NN O) N M I- O 0 W
W
0
I- O O O r O 7 O N M 7 Cr (O � I� 12 n 7 N
L(') 7 7 LO 7 7 7 M 7 7 N � N � � N �
W
� LO LO 7 O N 7 OM E O7 m 7 M NI� M r O M OL) 7 I� r Or N N N NL8 M O IM- 7 0 N NM O n MN I-qN n MN LO N N 7 000
0 7 O
W
0
M LO O O O 7
- 2 LO N N N
W
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
I-
W
0
7 4 0 0 7 2 2 4 O LM M O O N 12 N O 2 2 O N 1 IN r 2 N O N M 7 (M MO N no
4M 7 0 MO (NO N M N N7 I- -- mm
W
0
W 0 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 UD 0 7 0 Lo 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0
N N N M M M M 7 7 7 7 LO LO LO LO (O 7D (O (O I- r r r N N N N O O O O coO O O � � N N N N M M M M 7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
LL
N 7 N 0 7 r� N N N 7 (O M— N O M M 7 N r� N O M 0 0 0 (O N N I- 7 N (O O I- M N r r M 0 M (O N 7 O
(O Cl) 7 LL') (O ll') I� r r r r r M W M o (O o o (O o (O (O N r�
H
W
0
LL') I- N O N r— N 7 M O N— N— 0 7 N M N N N N M N � O O N N rO) Om O) (O N I- rO) N 7 (O O I� N (00 'r! N
N N 7 I� M N r M N W M N r M M (coq LL') (O 7 (O ll') M (O M
H
W
0
7 M 0 0 M 0 N— —— N N N N N O LO M 0 7 N M 0I: M M 7 I- M N (O 7 I� LO Cl) N LO 7 (O (O r� Nr- 7 0) I- r
LO I- O) (O 0 0 O 0 0 M O M M r LO M LO I- LO I- LO
W
0
M M M I- 0 7 (O M I- M— 7 M N (O M O LO 7 r, O I, 0 0) Cl) O) O N (O LO O O (O Cl) O) (O O) O) O) I, 7 CO (O CO Cl)
N N N M 7 I- N O) N O N N N N I- N N O I- O O O N O O
W
0
N O N (O (O I� 7 N (O 7 0 LL') N M M ll') M I� N N M N 7 0 M I- N N N N O M O M r N CO 7 N N I- O N O
N N M 7 LO 7 (O I- r r W M LO (O (O (O LO (O 7 LO 7 r� r r N O)
H
W
0
r� CO LO (O LO r, N LO 00 7 0 7 7 7 M I, M : O) Lf) I - r 0 7 O) N M O (O O) N M M N N N O LO I -
cc.) M M N 7 I� M (coq N O M O N Nr— r r r 7 LL') 7 r LO I- r r r W
W
0
O r r 7 M On -- MM— O N N CO— O 7 M LO (O MO O O N LO r N N N (O O r N 7 M N 7 0 0 Lo l� M N O
N Cl) Cl) 7 Cl) LO 7 7 7 7 7 Cl) Cl) Cl) 7 Cl) 7 7 7 7 7 LL') 7 LO
H
W
0
O O I- O M Lf) 7 co CO Lf) 7 N 7 7 N LO — 7 M I, r M M LO N O O N (O I, CO O r O r O N 7 (O LO I, Cl) LO O) 7 (O N O
N N N 7 Cl) LO LO O) (O (O 7 (O LO I- M 7 7 LO LO (O (O LO (O (O (O LO
W
0
N I� O r r O N M N M N N M N N (O 7 N M O M M ON L2 7 I- O 0 N M 7 M 0 M M N O N N N O N N0 0
N N M 7 M 0 7 (O (O (O 0 7 LO LO LL') 7 7 7 (O (O ll') (O LO r�
W
0
I- M M 7 N N M— M — N 0 0 0 7 M— M N 7 0 1 (O M N 7 N r� O N M O NM N 0 O 7 0 O r� 0 r� 0 r�
M N 7 7 M 0 0 M 0 7 M M 7 7 7 M 7 7 M 7 7 7
W
0
M 0 0 M 7 M— 0 M O M 0— M— N M N M 7 0 N M O7 M M N N NM I- N NM 0 M r- N O N O M N N 0
N N N Cl) 7 7 7 (O (O I� LL') LL') ll') (O ll') ll') ll') M 7 M ll') 7 7 7 7 7 7
W
0
0 zr r� 7 N N N M 7 7 N 7 N N N 0 r� M Lf) M (O N NM N O M O O 0 N N N N 0 M 7 M M 0 0 0 O N M M 0 7
N Cl) 7 7 (O r� co O) co co co O co r� (O (O 7 LO LO LO LO LO LO r� co r
W
0
7 M M 7 M 7— 7— 0— M— N 0 7 7 N M 0 r� O N M M O O 0 7 0 7N r� O N 7 M O O O O NM 7 N 0
Nm Nm M 7 0 0 0 I� (O LO (O (O 0 7 0 M M M 7 M 0 7 LL') Cl) LO
W
0
M N 0 N M M N N N 7— N M— N N (O 7 7 (O N M NO N M N O M 7 O N 0 O N r� 7 0 N O (O O 7 (O (O N r� 7
N N N 7 0 r� r r r O r r r r M 7 (O 7 7 0 7 7 7 7 (O 7 0
W
0
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
H
W
0
M 7 7M N 7 — N N— M N NM M M 7M M 0 N M N L2 O I� Or N I� O N M 7 (O O N N N I� M I� W
� 7 � � � M 7 M ll') M LL') I� ll') ll') 7 7 7 7 M 7 ll') ll') ll') M 7 ll') ll')
W
0
7 O 0 7 0 X 0 7 0 � O 7 O � O 7 O X 0 7 0 ZE 0 7 0 X 0 7 0 � O 7 O X 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
N N N N M M M M 7 7 7 7 LL') ll') ll') ll') (O (O (O (O I� r r r N N N N O O O O O O O O N
LL
O O O N IO- N M M r Or NO N N F NO n O NM NN ON w AM
M7 12 O N IN- MO E N Nr O W :72
N 7 MIM- O OM MO on O MN N :
W
0
12 (O O I- N O O L(') O 7 L(') O O O N N N N L(') 7 0 0 7 N I- M O (O (O O 7 N (O N 7 (O O M
I� L(') I� r O O r O r r O N O O N M 7 7 N M O N (O 7 7 'or 7 M M L(') 7 ImO N 7 (`') (`') 1.0 (`') A N N A
W
7 M N N7(NOO ro-7 02
0IO- 9
0 I00 OO NOO 2
0
7 2
0 OO OO NN OO 7O ColM O7O7 NM NMM I�NN I�NM MN0o
W
0
M O M O (O 7
N 0 0 I0 -ON O O 8OOOn N S O ON N MrOM mO 8 n � mO� IN- I�r N Or O L() L() L() N O O N N I(- N NN 7 0 (N O
W
0
N IO- O rN Nr r7 r IO- E I -_r O Nr M N M N O O LN N IO� M F M M 7 2 NNr N IO- M IL- O r7 N Mr O Mr MN O O(Om, NN r O
W
0
7 M I- M M 7 O N M N r r O O O 7 0 L(') 7 N N (O N (O 7 I- O O N or 7 M N or O N I- M or 7 7 N N
N I� N O r r r O r N N O N O O O O O O O � 0 0 O N O I� r O r O 7 7 7 7 7 M M M 7 7 7 M N � N
W
0
O M N N L(') I - L(') I- M L(') (O L(') O 7 (O ro- N 7 N 7 L(') (O 7 I- M O I� 0 7 0 N O I- N r N N L(') N L(') N 7 I- N
L(') L(') L(') L(') L(') (O L(') 7 L(') 7 L(') L(') 7 N L(') L(') I� r 7 I� O r O r r L(') L(') I� L(') 7 7 7 M M N 7 7 N N N � N � � �
H
W
W
r M N N N 7 (O M N O I� N N r N
(`') (`') (`') (`') (`') (`') 7 (`') (`') N N N � � c-, �
W
O N I- N 7 I` 7 On N 7 (O N D N I- M O O
O L(') 7 (`') (`') (`') (`') N N (`') N (`') N N N N � � � � -
W
N 7 0 I- 7 N I- 7 0 no N 7 no O N I -q O O O n N (O O O (O M
r r O r r O r r L(') 7 L(') L(') (`') 7 (`') (`') (`') N N N N N N N (`') N N N N
W
0
,N, O M N Mr L ) M O N, M -r O 2 Nr 0 7 M 7 N N NO -r M N 0r 7r 7 O O O N O O 7 no
O O N(MN(I�N () N O r
N
W
0
7 (O N I� -E
-2
N 0 7 I- O M 7 E M O O D O MO 7 N M N Ron
n N M n 7 0 7 I: 7
- E 7 7 L(') I� L(') I� O O r r r r O O r r L(') (O L(') (`') 7 (`') (`') (`') (`') N N (`') N (`') N N N N (`')
W
0
NN M O (O N lf) M
W
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
I-
W
0
7 4 2 L) O O N 2 M N T -L(') O O O -r O N 7 O .N 2 S O S 7 M 0 -L(') O M 2 N O N(`) 7N (O) 7 NN -7 N 7N 0 ON NNOM (2 N
W
0
W 0 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 7 0 LO 0 LO 0 LO 0 7 0 UD 0 7 0 L0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0
N N N M M M M 7 7 7 7 s l-, 0 a 8 (O 9 i I- r r r N N N N O O O O coO O O � � N N N N M M M M 7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
L2 CA O M M M r N 0 O M N— M N N N I- M M 7 0 O � I� M 0 M M N 0 Nr- N r N N 0 0 0 W M 7
M N N N Cl) M 7 M M o M M o M r r (o (n (o (o (o N r
H
W
0
O CA 7 7 M N M O N M N O N O N 7 N M r M O M I� 7 N M N N N 0 r� r M M M M N
M N N M M 7 M 7 Lf) M Lo Lo r� (o (o (o r M (o r (o (n
H
W
0
7 O M I- M M M 0 7 N— 7 M— N N O N— O M— 7 0 O r� r MO M M N M N M 7 0 M O N 7 7 0 N r� r O O
N N Nm M M M 7 M r M M r M 0 M r co r r co r
H
W
0
M 7 N 7 M 0 r� m 7 7 r� O 7 N— M 0 7 0 N N M W L2 7 M M r� N N0 0 0 r� 7 N 7 7 M N N O N r
� S CA N O O � O
W
N_ N M N M r N— M 7 N CA LL') 7 N0 M ll') Nm M ll') M I- M O N O O I� M M N 0 M M M 0 O r� N O N r r M N
N N � N Cl) M 7 7 7 M 0 M r M M r N N r N N O
H �
W
7 0 M N N 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 7 M M M 0 M 0 r� M 7 N M(
M N M 7 7 7 0 0 M M r M r r N O O N N O co O
H
W
0
O_ N M 7 N N 7 7 7 M O N— M O M N 7 Cl) Lo — Lo (D N CO O ll') N ll') 7 (A Lo I- 7 CO Cl) Lo Co O ll')N I- O r Lo
N Cl) N Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) 7 Lo Lo M (o Lo (o Lo M Lo
H
W
0
O I: N O r (D r (A (fl r r 7 (fl Cl) 7 (fl N 7 r 7 a) 7 ll') M O O Cl) O O D CO Co Lo O (A Cl) CO N (U O NI- N O Cl)
N N Cl) Cl) Lo N 7 (o (o Lo (D (D Qi (D O N N r N co r
W
0
N 7 CA I� CA 7 M 7 0 7 M— N N— M N 7 r� 0 r� 0 7 7 m M NN N M r� N0 r 7 0 O O O r� M N O O N
N N N Cl) 7 M M 0 0 7 r� M r 7 0 M M r r r (o
W
0
I� O r N 0 0 0 O 0 N— N O— 0 N 0 7— M N M M 0 0 0 M M MM 7 N 7 M ll') O O I- O N O O
N N N Cl) 7 Lli 7 Lo I� Lo Lo Lo Lo Lli (O (O Lo Lo
W
0
M N N N 0 N 0 0 7 N N N— O— N M M 7 N 7 M N O 7 M M 07 7 0 0 0 N N O O 0 0 7 7 7 O N M M 0
NN N M N M 7 M M 7 7 M 0 7 0 ll') (o Lo Lo Lo Lo
W
0
M r� 7— 0— N N M 7 r� 0 O CA CA N N N I� ll')7 N1- O NM O 7 N0 0 M M M M ll') M
N Cl) N Cl) 7 7 7 M 0 M r M r r M r r r W M r W M
W
0
7 M M M M O N 0 7 M M N N 0 0 — M 0 M— M 7 M N r- N N 7I- N N 7 I- N O 7 0 O O 7 7
N N N N Cl) 7 7 7 ll') 7 Cl) (o M Lo Lo (D ll') (D Lo Lo Lo
W
0
M M CA M O 0 M M M M N— 0— N— 7 0 M 0 I- O 0 (R r N O r M N0 7 7 M M N 7 0 N0 r� O M O
N N N N Cl) Cl)
7 M Lli (O 7 7 Lli Lli (O Lli (O Lli Lli Lli Lli Lli
W
0
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
H
W
0
N M Ill') 7 M 7 M N 7 N— 7 N M M 7 I� ll') ll') N N � r 7 LL') O O M M ll') 7 N CA 0 O ll') M N r
MW
N N M M N cc mo 7 00 M N 7 cc mo (O (fl M M mo
W
0
0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0
N N N N M M M M 7 7 7 7 LL') ll') ll') ll') M M M M r r r r N N N N CA CA (A (A O O O O N
(O
(O
M
O
00
O)
N
O)
m
IL
0 0 7 N 0 O N O O M N 7M O N O r� O NM M N r r 0 N 7 M 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O
(O I� O O O O N r r M r r r r M N O N r r r r LO CO (O (O (O 7 LO ll') LO LO N
H
W
0
I� I� (O 7 N m I�
(O I� m O N O r l
N l') N ll') (O ll') r M r 0 LL') LL') M r 0 ll') m (O LL') 7 ll') 7 ll') 7 N
H
W
(O (O ll') ll') m (O (O ll') cq N m M N M
H
W
M O MO N O M 0 N O O O M N Nr— LO LO N (O 7 I- W M O O LO N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N N O O 0 0m 0 0 0 Or- O O O O co N r O r r LO (O (O m
W
0
N N N 0 7 M O CO 0N (O 7 N N O CO N N 0 (O O N0 N LO r� M N r� 0 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 O O O O N I- N r O r O N N N O O r co r r M co co r CO LO LO (O 7 LO
W
0
O M rO 7 0 I- 7 Cl) CO Cl) 0 LO 7 O (O CO O LO 7 0 r
7 LO r� CO (O LO O O CO N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
W
O N N O N N MM O N 7 M 0 r� 7 NM M N 0 7 NM O N N N0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
m m o l(( (O LO (O r� LO LL') m o m m o m 7 o o (O LO 7 LO 7 7 7 M Cl) Cl) N
H
W
0
O N O 0 r� M r� 7 m N 7 0 N 0 O 7N O M N r� M 7 N M 0 M M 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
F --N I- r r N N r M M O r r M r r r r M r r r r 0 0 m (O 7 7 7 M 7 N
W
0
N 0 0 0 O N O r� N N r N O M O N OO N V N N N NM O M r� 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
� r� M r r 0 r� M M r 0 0 r� r r r (O (O (O M (O LO (O 0 0 0 7 0 7 M 7 M N
W
0
M 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Cl)
W
(O 7 0 O M 0 N O r� O M 77 M 7 M O O r� 0 0 0 0 M r� W M N 7 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
(O LO LO LO ll') 0 m 0 7 0 7 m 7 0 7 7 M 7 Cl) 7 Cl)
W
0
� CO I- W M N N r M r M O N r r M r M M W M r r N ll') N (O I� ll') 7 7 7 7
W
0
Cl) 7 Cl) 7 Cl)
W
lM 0 O LI- 7 ll0 0 M 7 7 0 llM 7 7 lO 7 l 0 0 M 7 Cl) M M
W
0
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
H
W
0
7 r� O rO M M r� 7 N M O N r� M N 0 M 7 N 0 O 0 N 0 r� M 7 M 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
LO (O (O LO (O N (O ll') (O ll') ll') LL') (O ll') 7 r M ll') LL') LL') 7 ll') 7 ll') 7 7 7 7 7 0 M 7
W
0
7 O 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0
N N N M M M M 7 7 7 7 LL') LL') ll') L2 (O - (O (O I� r r r N N N N O O O O O O O O C, N N N N M M M M 7
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
M 7 I- LL') Om Nm LL') M (O ll') (O M M M M M O (O O M N l
l') 7 7 I� 7 7 O N M O O M O M r� O
(O � � � L2 N N M M M 7 M 7 7 mo I2 r M M M M
H
W
0
LL') ll') r� 0 7 M M N M M M 0 N O O N O N 0 0 M N 7 mm
I- M r mm M 7 0 O N
N M M M M M 7 7 7 I� r Lo 7 Lf) Lo
H
W
7 0 O M 0 N 0 M 0— M— N M M O M 7 I- 7 M N N 7 7 M O O M M r� r r NN N r M
N N N M N N N 0 7 M 7 7 m (O Lo Lo Lo 7
H
W
M 7 N O N N m 7 m 0 7m 0 0 7 7m m 7r- M O M 0 7 0 Lf) (O M N (O O7 r N N O M Om 7 0 0 7 7
N N M N N N M 7 M ll') 7 ll') I� r M r O N O N O O O
� r r
W
0
N (O M N ll') N 0 7 0 N 7— N— N 0 0 7 M 7 N N M 7 7 N 0 N L2 7 M M M (O 0 M M N(O 0 7 N 7 Cl)
N N N N 7 N 7 Lo 7 7 (O r- r M r
H
W
0
(O M (O O O (O N ll') I- r LL') N N O M (O ll') LL') N 7 7 (O ll') N 7 N N (O 7 (O I, O O r N 7 7 7 (O N Cl) N 7 0 (O CO
N N N N N N Cl) Cl) Lo 7 Cl) Lo Lo (O (O (O Lo Lo (O
H
W
0
O O Cl) N O I- N Cl) M— M N M O N— M 7 M O M M 0 7 I- 7 m 7 0 I- M O m N r� N N N N 7 N N N r� M M r� r
N N N M M M M M 7 0 7 7 0 ll')
H
W
0
O O M O O O M 7 Cl) N Lo N— Lo Lo O N Lo O N co O N Lo 7 N co 0 I- M O S (O O O I- N0 7 70 N 70 N0 7 7
N N N Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) 7 Cl) Lo (O Lo 7 Lo Lo (O
W
0
0 N M N M r� 7 0 N N M M N N 0— O— I- M O N N N N N (O N NM 7 N N N0 NM NM 0 r� r N
N N N N M N 7 7 N 7 M 7 7 M 7 M m
W
0
0 0 0— M N O O M 7 7 N— M — —— 7 0 7 m m O N O m L2 M 7 M M 7 M 7 M N N 0M
N N N N N M M 7 M 7 M M 7
W
0
m M N O O O 7 7 I- 7 7 N M N O M 7 0 0 N— 0 7 N M N O M m O M M N N O N m 0 0 0 I- r r M CO I, CO M O
N N N Cl) N Cl) Cl) Cl) M 7 Lo 7 7 7
W
0
Lo (O (O (O M O m N 0 7 M M 7 N— 0 7 0 0 7 M N N M 7 0 7 (O O 7 N N r 70 7 7 0 M O 0 m O m
N M
Cl)
W
0
7 7 N O O 7 N 7 0 7 m M N N O M 7 0 7 M N m M 7 M M O N I- O L2 7 0 I -O M M M M N r�
N M Cl) N M 7 Cl) Cl) 7 Lo LL') 7 Cl)
W
0
M (O O O N 7 N M 0 N 0 N O 0 m O 0 N N M r� O 0 N M N L2 7 M N r� 7 0 7 0 O r� N N M 0 7 r� O 0
N N N N M N N M M M M M M 7 M 7
W
0
C O O O O m N 0-- m — 0 7 0 — O N 0 Nm M M m M N O N r� N 7 � I� M 7 M I� M O (O N N N O I� r M
N � � � � N N N N N M M M N 7 N M 7
W
0
L2 O M Lf) O I- N M M (O 7 (O (O N 7 7 N 7 0 0 (O I- 0 7 O N N N (O 0N M 0 7 M I- M 0 I- N 0 O O O O
N N N N M Nm M N 7 7 7 7 Cl) 7 7 Lo
W
0
7 O 0 7 0 X 0 7 0 � O 7 O X 0 7 0 X 0 7 0 ZE 0 7 0 X 0 7 0 � O 7 O X 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
N N N N M M M M 7 7 7 7 LL') ll') ll') ll') (O (O (O (O I� r r r N N N N O O O O O O O O N
7 0 N I� O N O r r M M 0 I� O 0 M N O N N 7 0 7 M M N M 0 7N N N O M N N N m O ll') M N O N O (O
0 0 0 7 0 m 0 0 7 M M M N N N N � N N
H �
W
0
L2`T 0 M I� 0 M M M O 0 M N M N 7 N 7 0 O 0 O:7
7 N 7 N N N I- M N O I- O N I� O M O (O M I— � O O N Nm
LO LO ll') M 0 0 0 7m M N N N
H
W
0
7 0 I� O O 7 M 0 N N 7 N M 7 (O (O 7 NN N CO N LO O N LO Cl) Cl) I- N Cl) N Lf) (O 7 7 I- M LO 7 7(D 7
LO (O I- r 7 LO LO I- LO LO LO LO LO LO (O LO LO (O 7 LL') LO Cl) Cl) 7 7 M M M M Cl) N N N N N
H
W
0
M c00.
7 N 7 N 0 f) -LMO O O 0 Cl) CO I- 7 0 I- r NM M M 0 0 0 Cl) N CO (O N � M O (O N LL') O O
N O O 0 0(O O O I� (MD NO LN N IN O (MD COO) O r co r N r r LO M Lf) 7 (O LO Lf) 7 co co N N N N N N
W
NLO O O NN N CO I� LO 7 I� r O LO LO N I- 7 0 7 LO Cl) CO LO O I� O co O Lf) N 7 N N N N LO O
I� M (O W (O r r N r r N r M W M M W M M r (O r 7 LO I- LO 7 LO N 7 M M N N N N N N N
H
W
0
N 7 M CO I- O M CO I (O M N I- O LO 7 LO 7 LO I- O LO M O (O (O I- M O CO M r LO M 7 LO r- 7 M 0 0 CO CO O N LO
I� r r LO I- r r N N M W (O (O co r (O co r (O (O LO (O 7 LO LO LO 7 LO Cl) Cl) Cl) M M N N N N N N
H
W
0
O N O N no MM M N Lf) O M M 7 M LOCI) I- M O O r O N O r M 7 (O I- N Lf) N I: N O O 7 0 0 7 LOO N N
LO (O ll') LO 7 (O 7 LO LO LO 7 LO LL') (O (O LO LO 7 7 7 7 Cl) 7 7 Cl) N 7 N N N N N
H
W
0
0 7 Cl) LO LO N I- 7 7 7 (O I� Cl) LL') LO (O N O N LO 7 0 I- LO (O N O O O O N N (O 7Q 7 M M (O N (O (O LO M
LO I� (O LO (O I� LO (O (O (O (O (O (O (O (O LO (O LO LL') LO (O Cl) LO 7 7 Cl) 7 Cl) Cl) Cl) N N N N N
W
0
N o o 7 N 7 M r- 7 mm 7 M N 7 mo mm N N m I- N N Om r M 7 7 7 O I- LL') O N O (O N 7 N (O LO CO CO
�- O o Om 00 00 00 O 7 7 O 7 O LOO 7 O 7 7 O 7 O 7 7 N M M M M N M N N
W
0
I� M O O M N 7 0I� M M 7 M N 7 7 M 0 M 0 O O N O O NM N I� r LL') m O LL') 7 ll') O N CO X 0 0 � N N �
� m 7 0 0 0 0 7 ll') 7 LO ll') 7 7 M 0 7 0 0 M 7 7 M N 7 7 M 7 M N M N N
W
0
m O O NN 0 I� N O r M N I� Nm N N M 7 m M O 0 M N 0 I� N O r r O O O N 7 0 0 M O m 7 7 0 M N
X 7 7 LO (O Cl) Cl) Cl) ll') 0 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 M M 7 7 m M 7 7 M 7 M M M N M N N
W
0
LL') 0m I� M O M N M 7 M I� 7 O I� 0 N m N m 7 M m 7 I� N0 0 0 7 7 I� O M 0 M O O I- M M M 0 7 N0
7 (O co (O I� LO (O I- (O (O M M (O (O ll') m m 0 0 0 0 m m 0 0 LO LO 7 7 LO Cl) 7 Cl) Cl) 7 N N N N
W
0
7N M m 0 Nm M m O M N N0 O I� 7 M m M M 0 I- N 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 I- O � O M O O 7 N 0 M M
� LO 7 ll') 0 7 7 M 0 7 M 7 0 7 m 0 0 0 7 7 7 7 0 M 7 7 M 7 7 M M N N � N N � N � �
W
0
M N N I- N 0 Nm 0 I� 0 m O m m M N0 I� O r r r 0 O M M 7 7 N N 7 0 O M N N m I� 0 0
X 7 7 7 7 M 0 M 0 7 7 7 (O 7 7 7 7 0 7 7 M M 7 Cl) Cl) Cl) N Cl) 7 Cl) 7 N M N N N
W
0
� 7 7 Cl) 7 7 M 7 M 7 7 7 M m M M 7 m M 7 7 Cl) Cl) N N
W
0
N O (O 7 0 M 7 0 N Or M 7 0 Lf) 00 N (O "TT
N On I- 7 0 M O M 7 0 � (O 7 � 0 M O M M O M 7 0
� ll') ll') 7 M ll') LL') LL') ll') ll') (O 7 LL') 7 ll') ll') 7 7 ll') 7 7 7 7 M ll') 7 7 7 N M M M N N M � N N
W
0
W M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0L2 (O (O (O N N N 7 0 7 0 7 0 7 0
N N N M M M M (O N O O O O O O O O C, N N N N M M M M 7
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O
N
O
N
O
O M V N O N N — —— N N N V r O r N r V M M O O M V V V M of of M M O N M M M N M M M M
a
F
W
D
V N M O O M O N O M M M N M m m V N N m V N M M O V O O M
F
W
D
W
D
M V of V O M N N V V m m W m m m W O M N M V N N2 M V V V N N V M V N O m
r N M M (O of O O) O) M N V M —— N O) O of O) N M O) of of of O O of
W
D
N V V O M M M— N M M M O O M of M N N M M M
F
W
D
r W M M O M O M N V M N of O r N O M O of O of M M M N r M N M r M M r M r
F r r
W
D
F
W
D
O) (O M V M M M N r O O M O M V V M r M M V of M M of V M N M V V O) r M M M O M V of M O M f� W
W
D
M M M O N M M N N M r
W
D
OV N O O O——— O N N M M N N O M 22 M m m O N m N
� � � � � M M M �n M y �n v
w
0
(O f� N V O V O N O— O O N N V N2M V V N O2 f� m N O m N O V V V M
F � � � N N � M V� (O (O r (O (O (O W (O � N M V
W
D
O) N V M N N N N O M V M r r M M N M M M V V V V V N M M N of O M M O V r N V
W
0
V N O M O M N O — —— O N M N M Q O M M O W M O r O W O M V M M N O M V O
W
D
M m M M N N O— N O N O O— m N r m of Mof m m N m M M O O M m 0 0 0( 0 m O f� r N
F r r N N M M� r (O O) (O O) f� O) of f� (O (O V M M M (O � M� (O V M V
W
D
(0
(0
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O w
U W
N D
N
0
M V N N O N O M M M N r N M O V M O M
� 0
r
rn
WOOOO� O� OO� OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
N M V O N N N N M M M M V V V (00 (O (MO r r r r W of W W O)O O O O N N N
O
U
W
O
O
0)
O) M O� M M M M M M N M M M of O M M r M r V O N O N
M O N N M N M O O) O) (O (O V V V V V N M N N N N N a
W
D
V (O (O (O r W of of of O O N N N M M M
W
D
V V O m m m V m N O M m f� N m M M V m O f� m W V O) V O) of O2 f� N M m O r V
� (O f� V (O (O (O (O (O � r r r O) of of of O) O O) N O O) of (O f� (O (O � M M N M M r N r r r r r r
F r r r
W
D
M of O) N N O N V m of N f� W r O O f� r V m m O m m m N O V M V O) V V O) of O N
O) O) O) of of of O O) O M N N N N N O of O) O) of (O M M N V N N N
W
D
N r V O O (O M O) M (O O) M V of N O) N V O) (O O) O (O O N m V of
(O (O (O (O (O (O (O N r r O) o o m m r m m r O) m m N (O (O V V V V V M V V N N r N r r r
F
W
D
W
D
m m O m m M O N N m r r O m of O N V of O O O) M O) V
F
W
D
O m m m V W V V O) W O m N O N O m O m V m (O m f�
W
D
N M M O r r (O (O (O N O)
W
D
N W N of N O m M M m N f� M f� N m M V 0 0 0 of f� M N m f� m O V V N V (O M M m� m
F M M V M V V V (O (O r r (O (O O) f� W f� r (O W� (O V V N N M N N N M N N � � � � � �
W
D
(O N V m m O N m M f� m m of of m of M m m O N V M N N of m m N O f� r m N N r m V M N m of m
F V V M M V M� M M� (O (O � (O ���� (O (O � V M M M N N N M M � N N N � � � �
W
D
r m O N O r N r M m V m O M Mof M V M M M of of M M N O M N O M N V M
W
D
M O of M M M M N N O N M M M V M V V M M M
W
D
W
D
(0
(0
N O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O F
U W
N D
N
0
M N of M O V O V M M N V O N O O
� 0
r
rn
W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N
� F � M� �M� V� ��� ��� �M� 1�2�r� �r� �W� �W� �� ��O ON N N NN N M M (2(2 �� �NN NN NN N
N N N N N N N
O
U
W
0
V
0
M O M O) O) V OM M O O V O) O) of O) V (O N N S M (O �
a
F
W
D
N (O M M N M O N N — —— M M N O V of of N M O N N M M O M M M N N O of M of M M M
F
W
D
V V M M N O O O V N N O M N O N (O N N M V O O N
W
D
M M Or N O M M N O M O O M N O
m M
M N O) M of O) f� O) of of O of O O O of
W
D
m r O N N V N N M N M O M O
F
W
D
W
D
O M O N N O N M M N O N N Y V N M V O M N V N M M M O O r r M M V
F
W
D
M N N O V V M V r M N M m of M MO) N M m m O m M f� N O O m O O V m N m m O of of m
F r r r N N N M � (O (O W (O (O (O f� (O � V V M (O V (O � � � V (O � M �
W
D
of V V V N (O N M V M M N N m V m f O m N r V O O M m V N M M M V O r M N r O V
W
D
f� M M M N N O O V N M N M M N V N M M M N M M M N M M M O of N N O W f�
W
D
(O V O M r M M O— N O O N N N M r W of O) O O V of of N M W M r M M N W M M M M
W
D
m M of V O N M V M M m O f� N V m M V of of O N M of f� r r m W m M of N of O M m m N M m f�
F r r r r N M M M � (O W O) of of O) � O) of O) (O of (O (O (O � � V (O (O of of
W
D
V M N O N O— N O V O N N M M V M M M V V O N M M O M O O W N O M
W
D
M O) (O V N N N M N M of N W M V m M of V O O f� r N r W f� r m N M O m m M m m N O O
F r r N N N N�� O) of f� W of O) � r r� (O (O � V V V V V
W
D
(0
(0
N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M N W m N of V O M m
O F N M M N V M M M M V M M
U W
N D
N
0
M W M M M O of M M M V M M M M f�
� 0
r
rn
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
N M V O N N N N M M M M V V V (00 (O (MO r r r r W of W W O)O O O O N N N
O
U
W
0
N
0
0)
V of O) (O of V O) N M V V M M O of M N O of of N M O M M O r O M O N N
O O N O) O M N N N O m of of (O V V V M M V M N N N r a
W
D
N M O M M O N
O O N N M N N M N N O
W
D
V V (O M O) O) V M (O V V m V O M M r M M O M M (O
W
D
M M V of N OO V m m (O V N V of M f� (O W N (O r M of m M of (O V r r r (O V V V M V V (O O) N
f� W O O of O M O M N O N M O N O O) of f� r (O V V M N M N N r
W
D
N M V O) O V V M of M M r O r W M of M M O M M V O O M O
F �
W
D
W
D
O f� V O of V N N M M of O) N O M W of M O N Y V of V r of of r f� O) O) of
F
W
D
O) of N N (O W V M M V O of M O M N N r M V M M M M O M M M N N O) N V (O r O O) of
W
D
of O N m m m M of V O f� N m m M m m r r M M m V M m M f� m m m O m r2 M V m � m
F f� (O V (O (O (O (O (O f� W f� r O) of of r of O) O) O O) of O of f� (O (O V M M M M M V M N N r r r r r
W
D
O W M O O O r V V N m N r O N N W N of N m O) O) f: M
V� V (O (O � r r r r W f� W f� O) f� r W f� (O � V� V M N V M N N N r r r r r r
W
D
N O M N W M M(O M f� V M V V M f� M r O
W
D
O m m O m V V N N m O V N N m f� m M m M N O M O f� V m V M m r V r of m
F � � (O (O � (O (O (O (O W O of f� O) of f� O) of of of of f� W of (O (O (O (O � V � � � � N M N N r N N r r r
W
D
V N
F M MV�O� mM OV mV O(O O�� N(O M(O r O(O m(O O(O mV OM mV NM MV mM NV NN ON �M� �(O � m
�
W
D
mm V N O N �O m V f� O W N� V O) N M� W m f�
r W f� r (O (O � V V N M V M M V N N N � � � � � �
W
D
(0
(0
N f� r of of O O m m O M O O m M m O O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U W
N D
N
0
(O � r O M O) M M O M of V V O (O O) O) N� M V O O) of V V M V� O W� V N M N m of
� (O (O (O (O r (O W of of of O) of O O) O) O) f� W (O (O (O V (O N M M M M M M M r N r r r r
� 0
r
rn
W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
N M M M M V V V (00 (O (MO r r r r W of W W O) O O O O N N N N N N N N M M M M
F N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O
U
W
[Pi
(O r N I- N N O N M 0— 7 0— M 7 m N O O 0 N M O N LO (O O N M M (O O N N O N I� N Or rO) (O O M O (O LO M M
� M N 7 LO I� M r N r O M r r r L(') (O 7 I� M L(') I� L(') M r r M
H
W
0
0 O M 7 0 O N O — — —— O M— N N M O— M 7 O 0 7 7 I- r 0 M N N 0 O M O N 0 7 NI� M N O 0 M N0 N
N NM M M I� r r M N r W M r M 7 LO 7 7 0 I� M 0 N I� 7
H
W
7 (O 7 N N 0 0 0 O N O N M (O N N 7 (O LO LO 7 N N N (O N 7 LO M 7 7 (O I� 0 7 N O O I� M N M
N � N 7 0 N N N N O � 0 0 O O N M r M M 7 (O M 0 rO M M M
W
0
M O 0 0 7 — m N 7m M M M 0 7 7 N M O N N m I- N 7 I- O 7 M I- 0 r 0 O I- O N 0 N O 0 I- O O 0
N Nm M M 0 I- O M N O M O N M O N O O O I- r O N N N N N
W
0
N O (O O M M 7 N M M 7 7 N M M— M N 0 7 N O O O O O I- 0 O N O M N 0 0 0 M I- O N N O O O M 0
N N Nm 7 0 0 m N N I� r M r r 0 7 7 7 m 0 m m m N I� M M
H
W
0
N O m N M M N 7 7 0 N M N M 7 m N M 7 LO O 0 N 0 0 0 O I� M N N m M 7 N M N M 7 m N O N 7 m
N M N
� r r
W
0
O N m M N— N— N N O O O 7 O I- M 7 (O LO N M O M I- N N 0 M r r O O O N M M N M O
N N Cl) 7 LO LO 7 7 7 7 7 7 N Cl) N 7 M 7 M 7 M 7 7 0 7
H
W
0
O I- M N r M M 0 N 0— 7 7 M 7 I- M O O N
� �
W
N N LO O LO M N N M M 7 M LO N M (O M N M N 0 7 (O (O (O O LO O M 0 l0 (O (O (O O M LO (O N (O IT M M
N N Nm
M M 7 LO LO LO (O 7 7 LO LO LO LO LO Cl) 7 7 LO (O 7 LO LO (O
W
I- — 7 0 7 N O N O— N — O — M O — M 7 N m 7 N 0 l0 N 00 Nm O N O I� O O N 0 r r0 7 r 0 0 0 m
Cl) Cl) 7 0 7 M 7 M 0 7 7 M M 7 M 7 7 7 7 M 7 7 7
W
0
M M N I� 7 7 N 0— 7— N N M 7 0 M I� r L2 M MN N N (O M O O 7 (O (O I- NM O L(') r O r r M O O
N Cl) N Cl) 7 (O 7 LO ID (O ID (O I� M 0 0 7 7 7 N 0 M 7 7 7 0 0 m
W
0
0 7 m m 7 N O M N O— M N N N I� N M I� N Mr 7 M 0 0 m M m I- N r M 7 N I- N N O N M 0 N 7 I� N N
N N M M LO LO N N O O O O O O O I- r M r M 0 0 0 0 0 I- O r r
W
0
7 7 N 0 N M— O M O— N N N N 0 7 0 0 N I� O N M O O L(') M r O r MN N O O O W M L(') I� 7 N M LO I�
M N M M o M m o m m (O (O (O LO (O 7 7 7 7 7 M 7 Cl) 7 LO 7 LO
W
0
co O co 0 N N O O — — —— N M N O O I- r N Mr 0 0 M 7 M M N N M M N 7 NM 0 N N M N I� O M M 7
N Nm 7 0 N I� N N N N r O N M L(') LO LO LO 7 7 7 7 Cl) 7 LO LO (O
W
0
N O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H
W
0
M 0 0 I� M M— N NM M 70 N 7 O M 0 M M O N M � N N (O7 IN� 'Or 7 Or IOD Or LOO LO OM MLO LO 07 07 77 77 N7 07 0LO (OLO M7 (O
� � � N � N LO LO LO
W
0
W l0 O 7 00 LO O 7 0LO O 7 0LO O 7 0LO O "TT
0LO O 7 0LO O 7 0 l0 O 7 0 l; O 7 0LO O 7 0 7 0
00 LO O 0LO
N0 N N N Cc)
0 M M M 'Or
0 7 7 7 LO0 LO LO LO (O0 (O (O (O I0� r r r N0 N N N 00 0 0 0 0 O O O N N
[Pi
N0 N 0 (O 7 N O O Nm 0 0 M I� r M 7 Nm I- N0 O N M M N r O r M 0 7 0 I: O M
M r LL') I� N N M N N N O N M 7 LL') M 7 N O N m 7 7 m M LL') 7 M 0 7 M 7 M M N N N
H
W
0
W
7 N M 0 N N O O 7 O N O M M O I� W 0 M 0 M M M O M 7 M 7 N O O I- O M N 0 O M N 7 ll') N 0
I� N 0 0 N � 7 N N N Nm M
W
M N0
N m I� O O O Nm O O M 7 N 0 I� 7 Nm I� N 0 0 0 N 7m 0 0 I� M m M M 0 M M N 7 N L2 N N
N O O N O O N N O N O N O M N O M N M 7 N 0 0 I- M I� LO CO 7 7 LO LO 7 CO M N N
W
0
N O M N N N M O M O N0 7 N N O N Nr— r 0 M 0 O I- O r 7 0 O I- r N O M M I- NM O (O O (O O N
I- (O r r r r (O r r r r N r N r W M O O N O O O N N O M M r 0 m M 7 7 M 0 M M N N N
H
W
0
OI� 0 0 N O I, CO O r O r 0 7 I, LO (O CO 7 7 LO CO O N N I, N r Cl) I, Cl) I, Cl) O N N (O 7 (O (O ll') M O O
co (O I� r M M M M co M N O N N N N N O O co co O co O r co (O (O Cl) Cl) ll') LL') 7 LO CO 7 Cl) co N N N
H
W
0
0 7 0 I- O co M O O co O O co O I- O N O M OO 7 7 N N N M LO O N N 7 7 7 (O O I- co LO N I-
LO CO 7 CO LO 7 M 7 7 LO LO 7 7 7 7 (O I� (O LO (O 7 Il N r M LO (O LO N M M Cl) C-4
N N L2 M
H
W
0
O7 0) 7 O CO 7 N N N LO I- O LO N CO (O I- O O 7 N N LO I— W r LO O N M O I- 7 N ll') O 7 (O (O
I� LO (O LO (O (O (O (O (O LO Il M r r r r co r N W M r r M r 7 Cl) 7 7 7 co N N N N
W
0
N m 0 0 7 7 0 7 MO O O O N 7 N 0 I� N r O M I� W M M I� O r N M O M O 7 I� O N 7 0 M 7 O
I� r r r r r O N N O N O N I� N r r 0 m I- 7 7 7 7 7 M M N N N N
W
0
I� N O r r M m I� O M O m O M I� 0 m M N 7 I� r 0 0 7 N 0 7 I� r 7 N ll') I� r N O r O O M O M (O
7 0 7 7 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 m m m I� M M O r N O M M r M r Lf) 7 7 N N 7 7 M N N � � N
W
0
m M N 0 0 N O N N 7 m O 0 N I� N M O M 0 I� N M 0 I� W M 0 N 77 M 0 0 M N 7 M M M N N M N NM M
� 7 0 7 M 7 M M M 7 7 m I� r0 I� 0 I� r M M 0 m m 0 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 M M M M M M N N �
W
0
0 I- O M M O NM 7 I� 0 M N0 N O 0 I- M M 7 0 N0 N 0 7 N N 7 M 7 7 0 N N � M N
� LO I- M M M LL') (O 7 (O (O N O I� r O N O O N O M N O r M M r 0 I� 7 7 7 7 7 M M N M N N N
W
0
77 M Nm 7 M 0 0 7 M Nm I� Nm M O N O O 7 0 m Nm N I- Nm 0 m N N 0 Nm (O M I: M I� W M r M
X M N � N
W
M 7 m O M N NM 7 7 N 7 M 0 7 N NI- 7 M m 0 I- M M 0 7 0 M Nm M 0 M O � O M O O
X 7 7 7 M 7 0 7 7 7 7 0 m (O 0 I� M N 0 I� r r r r M ll') 7 0 7 m N 0 M N N N N N N � �
W
0
N O O O O O O O O O N O O I� M O O O O N O O — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CO LO LO 7
W
0
N M O m m 0 7 m 0 7 m O O N O O N I� O M M O m O I- M Mx 7 7 7 7 N m O � M 7 N M M N � N
7 0 0 7 7 7 0 7 0 m 7 m m m N N N O I� O� r M N r M 0 (O m 7 M 7 M M N N N N N M
W
0
W O 'T 'T 'T 'T O Lf) O 'T O Lf) O 'T 'T 'T O EL;
� M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0 � M 7 0 M 7 0 M 7 0
_ N N M M M M 7 7 7 7 ll') LL') LL') ll') (O — (O (O I� r r r N N N N O O O O O O O O � N N N N M M M M 7
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Synchro 8.0Tm Reports
For
SCAT 2013
Work Order 172
Econolite Master 197
US 14 @ IL 83 / Prospect Ave.
June 2016
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 108 of
Econolite #197 - AM Period
1: U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue & Central Road 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
940
Adj. Flow (vph)
1022
Lane Group Flow (vph)
1061
Turn Type
NA
Protected Phases
8
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
8
Switch Phase
52
Minimum Initial (s)
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
59.5
Total Split (s)
76.0
Total Split (%)
44.7%
Yellow Time (s)
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
9.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
-9.5
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
C -Max
Act Effct Green (s)
72.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.42
v/c Ratio
0.71
Control Delay
43.7
Queue Delay
0.0
Total Delay
43.7
LOS
D
Approach Delay
43.7
Approach LOS
D
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 3:WBT and 8:EBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90
Intersection Signal Delay: 27.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.1 % ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
splits ana rnases: 1: u.b. "14/ rrospect Avenue & central Koaa
#1 #2 #1 #2 # 1
�1--
12 0O;F'b
18s.. his 76 s 1 N=30s
1 #2 #1 #2 #1 #2
05 06 11 03 R)
22s 42 s 1 M76 s
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 109 of
36 0 772
48
32
39 0 839
52
35
0 0 839
52
35
NA
Prot
Perm
2356
4
1
2
3
5
6
4
2356
4
4
15.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
37.5
37.5
7.5
52.5
38.5
7.5
21.5
30.0
30.0
18.0
46.0
76.0
22.0
42.0
17.6%
17.6%
11%
27%
45%
13%
25%
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
9.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
-2.5
-2.5
11.0
11.0
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
None
None
None
None
C -Max
None
None
136.0
19.0
19.0
0.80
0.11
0.11
0.30
0.26
0.20
0.9
87.0
86.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
1.1
87.0
86.1
A
F
F
1.1
86.7
A
F
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 3:WBT and 8:EBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90
Intersection Signal Delay: 27.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.1 % ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
splits ana rnases: 1: u.b. "14/ rrospect Avenue & central Koaa
#1 #2 #1 #2 # 1
�1--
12 0O;F'b
18s.. his 76 s 1 N=30s
1 #2 #1 #2 #1 #2
05 06 11 03 R)
22s 42 s 1 M76 s
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 109 of
Econolite #197 -
AM Period
2: US 14/ Prospect Ave. & Central Road
6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
24
796 152
0 672
56 48
636
28 72
264
4
Adj. Flow (vph)
26
865 165
0 730
61 52
691
30 78
287
4
Lane Group Flow (vph)
26
1030 0
0 791
0 52
721
0 78
291
0
Turn Type
custom
NA
NA
Prot
NA
Prot
NA
Protected Phases
4
48
3
1
6
5
2
Permitted Phases
8
Detector Phase
4
48
3
1
6
5
2
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
15.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
37.5
38.5
7.5
21.5
7.5
52.5
Total Split (s)
30.0
76.0
18.0
42.0
22.0
46.0
Total Split (%)
17.6%
44.7%
10.6%
24.7%
12.9%
27.1%
Yellow Time (s)
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
9.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
-2.5
-9.5
-0.5
-2.5
-0.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
11.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
None
None
None
Act Effct Green (s)
84.0
95.0
72.0
10.7
38.5
17.5
47.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.49
0.56
0.42
0.06
0.23
0.10
0.28
v/c Ratio
0.07
0.53
0.53
0.47
0.90
0.43
0.30
Control Delay
0.7
0.8
37.8
89.9
79.1
69.5
62.8
Queue Delay
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
0.7
1.1
37.8
89.9
79.1
69.5
62.8
LOS
A
A
D
F
E
E
E
Approach Delay
1.1
37.8
79.8
64.2
Approach LOS
A
D
E
E
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 3:WBT and 8:EBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90
Intersection Signal Delay: 38.9 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.1 % ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
splits ana rnases: z: ub "14/ rrospect Ave. & central Koaa
#1 #2 #1 #2 # 1
�1--
12 0O;F'b
18s.. his 76 s 1 N=30s
1 #2 #1 #2 #1 #2
05 06 i 1 408 R)
22s 42 s 1 M76 s
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 110 of
Econolite #197 - AM Period
2: US 14/ Prospect Ave. & Central Road 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
15.0
59.5
76.0
45%
4.5
9.0
C -Max
Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 111 of
Econolite #197 -
AM Period
I IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue
6/29/16
II
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
8
20
8 24
20
8
4
588
4 60
588 40
Adj. Flow (vph)
9
22
9 26
22
9
4
639
4 65
639 43
Lane Group Flow (vph)
9
31
0 26
22
9
4
643
0 65
682 0
Turn Type
Prot
NA
Perm
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
custom
NA
Protected Phases
3
312
12
8
56711 12411
Permitted Phases
12
12
8
56711
Detector Phase
3
312
12
12
12
8
8
56711 12411
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.0
42.0
42.0
42.0
37.5
37.5
Total Split (s)
13.0
42.0
42.0
42.0
36.0
36.0
Total Split (%)
7.6%
24.7%
24.7%
24.7%
21.2%
21.2%
Yellow Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
2.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
-2.0
-2.0
-2.0
-2.0
-2.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
4.0
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lag
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None
None
None
None
C -Max
C -Max
Act Effct Green (s)
8.3
31.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
33.6
33.6
89.4
131.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.05
0.18
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.20
0.20
0.53
0.77
v/c Ratio
0.10
0.05
0.23
0.14
0.07
0.03
0.92
0.07
0.25
Control Delay
39.2
18.0
78.7
75.7
74.5
57.2
85.4
21.3
0.2
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
Total Delay
39.2
18.0
78.7
75.7
74.5
57.2
85.4
21.3
0.4
LOS
D
B
E
E
E
E
F
C
A
Approach Delay
22.8
76.8
85.2
2.3
Approach LOS
C
E
F
A
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92
Intersection Signal Delay: 41.6 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue
.3 #44 3 #4 «3 #4 #3 #4 1#3 #4 #3 #4
T � •
-4402 7 T 04 R'e 11 X 12
133s 1 37s 1 51s 4 sMIJU13s 42s
,
ti�V4�' d6 7 ��lll�
t l0s R
13• s
3:7 Is 1,5 s 36S
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 112 of
Econolite #197 - AM Period
I IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
1 2 4 5 6 7 11
3.0
15.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
1.0
6.0
41.5
40.5
6.0
34.5
7.5
14.0
13.0
37.0
51.0
13.0
37.0
15.0
14.0
8%
22%
30%
8%
22%
9%
8%
3.0
4.5
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.5
4.5
0.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
1.0
8.5
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lead
None
None
C -Max
None
None
None
None
Synchro 8 Report
Page 5
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 113 of
Econolite #197 -
AM Period
4: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14
6/29/16
II
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
12
624 100
28
280
76
40
544
20
40
560 4
Adj. Flow (vph)
13
678 109
30
304
83
43
591
22
43
609 4
Lane Group Flow (vph)
13
787 0
30
387
0
43
613
0
43
613 0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
custom
NA
Prot
NA
Protected Phases
5
2
1
6
31112
81112
7
4
Permitted Phases
2
6
8
3
Detector Phase
5
2
1
6
31112
811 12
7
4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
6.0
41.5
6.0
34.5
7.5
40.5
Total Split (s)
13.0
37.0
13.0
37.0
15.0
51.0
Total Split (%)
7.6% 21.8%
7.6%
21.8%
8.8%
30.0%
Yellow Time (s)
3.0
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
1.0
-2.5
1.0
-2.5
-0.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None
None
None
None
None
C -Max
Act Effct Green (s)
52.2
46.1
66.0
55.9
78.6
82.6
9.4
47.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.31
0.27
0.39
0.33
0.46
0.49
0.06
0.28
v/c Ratio
0.04
0.84
0.14
0.34
0.07
0.36
0.44
0.63
Control Delay
14.5
28.8
35.9
42.5
0.4
0.9
77.0
59.2
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
14.5
28.8
35.9
42.5
0.4
1.4
77.0
59.2
LOS
B
C
D
D
A
A
E
E
Approach Delay
28.5
42.0
1.3
60.4
Approach LOS
C
D
A
E
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92
Intersection Signal Delay: 32.0 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14
.3 #44 3 #4 «3 #4 #3 #4 1#3 #4 #3 #4
T � •
-4402 7 T 04 R'e 11 X 12
133s 1 37s 1 51s 4 sMIJU13s 42s
,
ti�V4�' d6 7 ��lll�
t l0s R
13• s
3:7 Is 1,5 s 36S
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 6
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 114 of
Econolite #197 - AM Period
4: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
3 8 11 12
3.0
15.0
1.0
3.0
9.0
37.5
14.0
42.0
13.0
36.0
14.0
42.0
8%
21%
8%
25%
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
1.5
2.0
8.5
8.5
Lag Lag Lead
None C -Max None None
Synchro 8 Report
Page 7
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 115 of
Econolite #197 - AM Period
5: Emerson Street & US 14
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
20 600
22 652
22 704
pm+pt NA
5 2
2
5 2
3.0 15.0
6.0 28.5
13.0 35.0
15.3% 41.2%
3.0 4.5
0.0 2.0
1.0 -2.5
4.0 4.0
Lead Lag
None C -Max
62.9 60.6
0.74 0.71
0.03 0.28
1.1 2.9
0.0 0.0
1.1 2.9
A A
2.9
A
48 32
412
52 35
448
0 35
465
pm+pt
NA
1
6
6
2.0
1
6
3.0
15.0
6.0
31.5
13.0
35.0
15.3%
41.2%
3.0
4.5
0.0
2.0
1.0
-2.5
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
C -Max
63.9
62.5
0.75
0.74
0.06
0.18
4.0
5.6
0.0
0.0
4.0
5.6
A
A
5.5
A
6
16 20
44
17 22
48
0 22
78
Perm
NA
4.5
8
8
2.0
8
8
8.0
8.0
34.5
34.5
37.0
37.0
43.5%
43.5%
4.5
4.5
2.0
2.0
-2.5
-2.5
4.0
4.0
None None
14.5 14.5
0.17 0.17
0.11 0.24
29.4 21.4
0.0 0.0
29.4 21.4
C C
23.1
C
Cycle Length: 85
Actuated Cycle Length: 85
Offset: 27 (32%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.35
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.7 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.2% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: Emerson Street & US 14
6
28 20
92
30 22
100
0 22
113
Perm
NA
4.5
4
4
2.0
4
4
8.0
8.0
36.5
36.5
37.0
37.0
43.5%
43.5%
4.5
4.5
2.0
2.0
-2.5
-2.5
4.0
4.0
None None
14.5 14.5
0.17 0.17
0.10 0.35
29.1 30.7
0.0 0.0
29.1 30.7
C C
30.4
C
6/29/16
12
13
0
1 IF
X02 R)
■ 04
13s
35s
3.2s
05
06(R)
03
13s
35s
37 s
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 8
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 116 of
Econolite #197 - AM Period
6: IL 83 & Central Road
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
176 688
191 748
191 757
pm+pt NA
7 4
4
7 4
3.0 15.0
6.0 30.0
14.0 31.0
16.5% 36.5%
3.0 4.5
0.0 1.5
1.0 -2.0
4.0 4.0
Lead Lag
None C -Max
40.2 32.6
0.47 0.38
0.54 0.56
18.1 16.2
0.0 0.0
18.1 16.2
B B
16.6
B
8 56 488
9 61 530
0 61 587
pm+pt NA
3 8
8
3 8
3.0
15.0
6.0
29.0
14.0
31.0
16.5%
36.5%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
C -Max
34.2
28.1
0.40
0.33
0.22
0.51
14.1
25.1
0.0
0.0
14.1
25.1
B
C
24.1
C
MEE
52 40
468
57 43
509
0 43
596
pm+pt
NA
5
2
2
1.5
5
2
3.0
15.0
6.0
30.0
13.0
27.0
15.3%
31.8%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
Max
29.3
23.6
0.34
0.28
0.15
0.62
5.2
21.3
0.0
0.0
5.2
21.3
A
C
20.2
C
Cycle Length: 85
Actuated Cycle Length: 85
Offset: 62 (73%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62
Intersection Signal Delay: 21.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.0% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: IL 83 & Central Road
80 168
448
87 183
487
0 183
661
pm+pt
NA
1
6
6
1.5
1
6
3.0
15.0
6.0
31.0
13.0
27.0
15.3%
31.8%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
Max
35.1
29.7
0.41
0.35
0.61
0.56
25.1
25.7
0.0
0.0
25.1
25.7
C
C
25.6
C
6/29/16
160
174
0
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 9
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 117 of
13I
2:7 Is
14 Is
31 Is
05
06
07
1 03 R
13 Is 1
2:7 Is M-14
Is
al Is
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 9
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 117 of
Econolite #197 - AM Period
Artarial RAnrhA4HthC 70th Parcanfila Araan Timac
S19AIl F
F
n StreetssStreet Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
et
2: US 14/ Prospect Ave
@ Central Road
4: US 14
@ IL 83
_
50
5: US 14
e
_
@ Emerson Street
Timing Plan: 211
Sam Schwartz
Arterial Band 0 s
EQ Arterial Bard 39 s
1tIVJ
W%Aerial
terial Ba d 0 s
EB Band s
MEEEff<" I 10000=cu
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 118 of
Econolite #197 -AM Period
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Offset
is IL 83
E� Central Road
t: IL 83
ED US 14
3:
IL 83 _
Prospect Avenue.
Sam Schwartz
I III r"1lav
NB Arterial Ban 25 s
SB Arterial Band 22 s
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 119 of:
Econolite #197 -AM Period
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Offset.... 1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....
1: Central Road _
@ U.S. 14/ Prospect Avj
2: Central Road _
§ US 14/ Prospect Ave
5: Central Road _
§IL83 4
Sam Schwartz
fffflI I MENEM
WB A erial Ba 31 s
EB rt rial B d s
1 1 WB Arterial BAnd 3h s
rterial Band 34 s
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 120 of:
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
1: U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue & Central Road 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
624 40
0 784
16
92
Adj. Flow (vph)
678 43
0 852
17
100
Lane Group Flow (vph)
721 0
0 852
17
100
Turn Type
NA
NA
Prot
Perm
Protected Phases
8
2356
4
1
2
3
5
6
Permitted Phases
4
Detector Phase
8
2356
4
4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
15.0
8.0
8.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
59.5
37.5
37.5
7.5
52.5
38.5
7.5
21.5
Total Split (s)
57.0
30.0
30.0
23.0
40.0
57.0
23.0
40.0
Total Split (%)
38.0%
20.0%
20.0%
15%
27%
38%
15%
27%
Yellow Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
9.0
9.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
-9.5
-2.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
11.0
11.0
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
C -Max
None
None
None
None
C -Max
None
None
Act Effct Green (s)
53.0
115.8
19.0
19.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.35
0.77
0.13
0.13
v/c Ratio
0.58
0.31
0.08
0.50
Control Delay
41.8
1.1
35.8
47.4
Queue Delay
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
41.8
1.5
35.8
47.4
LOS
D
A
D
D
Approach Delay
41.8
1.5
45.7
Approach LOS
D
A
D
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 3:WBT and 8:EBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67
Intersection Signal Delay: 21.7 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.8% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
splits ana rnases: 1: u.b. 14/ rrospect Avenue & central Koaa
2 #1 #2 *1 #2 #1
"l 4
�1 02 11111 4_ 4-
03 ��.'
23s.. 40 s 57s 30s
1 #2 ,*1 #2 M1 #2
23,s 40 s 1 M57 s
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 121 of
Econolite #197 -Off
Peak Period
2: US 14/ Prospect Ave. & Central Road
6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
60
580 76
0 624
132 88
376
28 132
416
4
Adj. Flow (vph)
65
630 83
0 678
143 96
409
30 143
452
4
Lane Group Flow (vph)
65
713 0
0 821
0 96
439
0 143
456
0
Turn Type
custom
NA
NA
Prot
NA
Prot
NA
Protected Phases
4
48
3
1
6
5
2
Permitted Phases
8
Detector Phase
4
48
3
1
6
5
2
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
8.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
37.5
38.5
7.5
21.5
7.5
52.5
Total Split (s)
30.0
57.0
23.0
40.0
23.0
40.0
Total Split (%)
20.0%
38.0%
15.3%
26.7%
15.3%
26.7%
Yellow Time (s)
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
9.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
-2.5
-9.5
-0.5
-2.5
-0.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
11.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
None
None
None
Act Effct Green (s)
65.0
76.0
53.0
13.9
36.7
18.3
41.1
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.43
0.51
0.35
0.09
0.24
0.12
0.27
v/c Ratio
0.21
0.40
0.67
0.59
0.51
0.67
0.47
Control Delay
6.0
0.9
39.1
78.9
50.9
45.1
43.5
Queue Delay
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
6.0
1.2
39.1
78.9
50.9
45.1
43.5
LOS
A
A
D
E
D
D
D
Approach Delay
1.6
39.1
56.0
43.8
Approach LOS
A
D
E
D
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 3:WBT and 8:EBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67
Intersection Signal Delay: 32.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.1 % ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
splits ana rnases: z: ub 14/ rrospect Ave. & central Koaa
2 #1 #2 *1 #2 #1
"l 4
�1 02 11111 4_ 4-
03 ��.'
23s.. 40 s 57s 30s
1 #2 ,*1 #2 M1 #2
� 4N06 "IIII!i
0.5 IUi � 06 R
23,s T 114os W57 s
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 122 of
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
2: US 14/ Prospect Ave. & Central Road 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
15.0
59.5
57.0
38%
4.5
9.0
C -Max
Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 123 of
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
I IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue II 6/29/16
--1. .4--- i
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 51 (34%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Jpiiis ana F'nases: S: IL 0,5 & U.J. "14/ F'rospecl Avenue/F'rospeCl Avenue
#3 #4 1#1 4 #3# 4 ,m 3 4F ,m 3 ,m 4 #3 4
o2 11 T 04 R) o11 3u 41012
133 s I 28s 52 s 4 s 13- s 30 s
IE
tIIYp,
"iq8 RI,
13• s
28s 14 s I 138s
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
28
30
0
Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 124 of
32
32
16 16
60
8
4
468
16 20
648
35
35
17 17
65
9
4
509
17 22
704
35
52
0 17
65
9
4
526
0 22
734
Prot
NA
Perm
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
custom
NA
3
312
12
8
56711 12411
12
12
8
56711
3
312
12
12
12
8
8
56711 12411
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
15.0
9.0
42.0
42.0
42.0
37.5
37.5
13.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
38.0
38.0
8.7%
20.0%
20.0%
20.0%
25.3%
25.3%
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
1.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
2.0
2.0
-2.0
-2.0
-2.0
-2.0
-2.5
-2.5
4.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
4.0
4.0
Lag
Lag
Lag
None
None
None
None
C -Max
C -Max
8.7
31.8
14.4
14.4
14.4
37.6
37.6
66.7
110.2
0.06
0.21
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.25
0.25
0.44
0.73
0.34
0.07
0.13
0.37
0.06
0.02
0.60
0.03
0.28
59.3
24.9
64.2
69.2
62.6
46.0
53.7
19.8
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
59.3
24.9
64.2
69.2
62.6
46.0
53.7
19.8
0.4
E
C
E
E
E
D
D
B
A
38.8
67.7
53.6
1.0
D
E
D
A
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 51 (34%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.4 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Jpiiis ana F'nases: S: IL 0,5 & U.J. "14/ F'rospecl Avenue/F'rospeCl Avenue
#3 #4 1#1 4 #3# 4 ,m 3 4F ,m 3 ,m 4 #3 4
o2 11 T 04 R) o11 3u 41012
133 s I 28s 52 s 4 s 13- s 30 s
IE
tIIYp,
"iq8 RI,
13• s
28s 14 s I 138s
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
28
30
0
Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 124 of
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
I IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
1 2 4 5 6 7 11
3.0
15.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
1.0
6.0
41.5
40.5
6.0
34.5
7.5
14.0
13.0
28.0
52.0
13.0
28.0
14.0
14.0
9%
19%
35%
9%
19%
9%
9%
3.0
4.5
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.5
4.5
0.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
1.0
8.5
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lead
None
None
C -Max
None
None
None
None
Synchro 8 Report
Page 5
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 125 of
Econolite #197 -Off
Peak Period
4: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14
6/29/16
II
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
12
372 100
72
436
56 32
444
32 44
524 4
Adj. Flow (vph)
13
404 109
78
474
61 35
483
35 48
570 4
Lane Group Flow (vph)
13
513 0
78
535
0 35
518
0 48
574 0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
custom
NA
Prot
NA
Protected Phases
5
2
1
6
31112
81112
7
4
Permitted Phases
2
6
8
3
Detector Phase
5
2
1
6
31112
811 12
7
4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
6.0
41.5
6.0
34.5
7.5
40.5
Total Split (s)
13.0
28.0
13.0
28.0
14.0
52.0
Total Split (%)
8.7%
18.7%
8.7%
18.7%
9.3%
34.7%
Yellow Time (s)
3.0
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
1.0
-2.5
1.0
-2.5
-0.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None
None
None
None
None
C -Max
Act Effct Green (s)
33.6
28.2
43.4
37.8
83.4
87.4
8.9
48.4
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.22
0.19
0.29
0.25
0.56
0.58
0.06
0.32
v/c Ratio
0.08
0.80
0.41
0.61
0.05
0.25
0.46
0.50
Control Delay
18.4
41.0
50.9
52.0
0.2
0.5
72.1
43.2
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
18.4
41.0
50.9
52.0
0.2
0.9
72.1
43.2
LOS
B
D
D
D
A
A
E
D
Approach Delay
40.4
51.9
0.9
45.4
Approach LOS
D
D
A
D
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 51 (34%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Signal Delay: 35.3 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.7% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Jpiiis ana F'nases: 4: IL 0,5 & UJ "14/ F'rospecl Ave./UJ "14
#3 #4 1#1 4 #3# 4 ,m 3 4F ,m 3 ,m 4 #3 4
o2 11 T 04 R) o11 3u 41012
133 s I 28s 52 s 4 s 13- s 30 s
IE
tIIYp,
"iq8 RI,
13• s
28s 14 s I 138s
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 6
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 126 of
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
4: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
3 8 11 12
3.0
15.0
1.0
3.0
9.0
37.5
14.0
42.0
13.0
38.0
14.0
30.0
9%
25%
9%
20%
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
1.5
2.0
8.5
8.5
Lag Lag Lead
None C -Max None None
Synchro 8 Report
Page 7
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 127 of
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
5: Emerson Street & US 14
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
12 460
13 500
13 539
pm+pt NA
5 2
2
5 2
3.0 15.0
6.0 28.5
10.0 34.0
13.3% 45.3%
3.0 4.5
0.0 2.0
1.0 -2.5
4.0 4.0
Lead Lag
None C -Max
52.7 50.6
0.70 0.67
0.02 0.23
2.6 3.2
0.0 0.0
2.6 3.2
A A
3.2
A
36 40
456
39 43
496
0 43
539
pm+pt
NA
1
6
6
2.0
1
6
3.0
15.0
6.0
31.5
10.0
34.0
13.3%
45.3%
3.0
4.5
0.0
2.0
1.0
-2.5
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
C -Max
54.9
54.5
0.73
0.73
0.07
0.21
4.5
5.5
0.0
0.0
4.5
5.5
A
A
5.4
A
6
40 32
76
43 35
83
0 35
109
Perm
NA
4.5
8
8
2.0
8
8
8.0
8.0
34.5
34.5
31.0
31.0
41.3%
41.3%
4.5
4.5
2.0
2.0
-2.5
-2.5
4.0
4.0
None None
14.4 14.4
0.19 0.19
0.15 0.29
25.3 21.8
0.0 0.0
25.3 21.8
C C
22.6
C
Cycle Length: 75
Actuated Cycle Length: 75
Offset: 31 (41%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.35
Intersection Signal Delay: 8.3 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.7% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: Emerson Street & US 14
6
24 28
92
26 30
100
0 30
130
Perm
NA
4.5
4
4
2.0
4
4
8.0
8.0
36.5
36.5
31.0
31.0
41.3%
41.3%
4.5
4.5
2.0
2.0
-2.5
-2.5
4.0
4.0
None None
14.4 14.4
0.19 0.19
0.12 0.35
24.6 23.5
0.0 0.0
24.6 23.5
C C
23.7
C
6/29/16
28
30
0
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 8
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 128 of
10S
34s
31s
�5
---
06R'd
11 03
10S
3 s
31s
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 8
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 128 of
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
6: IL 83 & Central Road
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
164 440
178 478
178 552
pm+pt NA
7 4
4
7 4
3.0 15.0
6.0 30.0
9.0 30.0
12.0% 40.0%
3.0 4.5
0.0 1.5
1.0 -2.0
4.0 4.0
Lead Lag
None C -Max
31.8 27.8
0.42 0.37
0.55 0.43
15.9 14.1
0.0 0.0
15.9 14.1
B B
14.6
B
68 92
448
74 100
487
0 100
565
pm+pt
NA
3
8
8
1.5
3
8
3.0
15.0
6.0
29.0
9.0
30.0
12.0%
40.0%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
C -Max
30.9
26.0
0.41
0.35
0.28
0.47
13.7
20.7
0.0
0.0
13.7
20.7
B
C
19.7
B
MEE
72 72
460
78 78
500
0 78
583
pm+pt
NA
5
2
2
1.5
5
2
3.0
15.0
6.0
30.0
9.0
27.0
12.0%
36.0%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
Max
28.8
24.8
0.38
0.33
0.31
0.51
14.5
14.7
0.0
0.0
14.5
14.7
B
B
14.7
B
Cycle Length: 75
Actuated Cycle Length: 75
Offset: 58 (77%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63
Intersection Signal Delay: 18.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.7% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: IL 83 & Central Road
76 100
484
83 109
526
0 109
704
pm+pt
NA
1
6
6
1.5
1
6
3.0
15.0
6.0
31.0
9.0
27.0
12.0%
36.0%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
Max
28.8
24.8
0.38
0.33
0.37
0.63
17.1
24.9
0.0
0.0
17.1
24.9
B
C
23.8
C
6/29/16
164
178
0
01
102
03
�04 R
9' S
2'7 5
5
30S
05
� 06
07 IF
% 06 R
9' S
2'7 5
5
30S
Timing Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 9
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 129 of
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
Arterial Bandwidths /dth Percentile Green Times 5129116
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Offset II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II
2: US 14/ Prospect Aver] tcf
@ Central Road NW Arterial Band 0 s
0
4: US 14 e B Arte -al Band 24 s
P+V I W1
@ IL 83 B Arte -al Band 0 s
51
5: US 14 e EB rterial and 24 s
@ Emerson Street N C IMENNOVAJ I mnlmieAl I "J
31
Timinq Plan: 111
Sam Schwartz
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 130 of:
Econolite #197 -Off Peak Period
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Offset
is IL 83
E� Central Road
4: IL 83
@ US 14
51
3: IL 83 _
@ Prospect Avenue.
51
Sam Schwartz
I
l
.ri Band 27 s
SB Arteriakl Ban
NB Arteria Ban
SB Arterial an
s
Ij
s /
s I
I
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 131 of:
Ecomolite #197 -Off Peak Period
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Offset.... 1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....
1: Central Road
@ U.S. 14/ Prospect Avj
?: Central Road _
US 14/ Prospect Ave
is Central Road _
�pIL83 4
Sam Schwartz
I 111WAVJ
B Arte 'a Band 30 s
B Arteri Band 30 s
�V1�lB ArterI �ar Btand 30 s
EB Arterial Band 30 s
IMEMENIONIAKI 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 132 of:
Econolite #197 - PM Period
1: U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue & Central Road 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
1076
Adj. Flow (vph)
1170
Lane Group Flow (vph)
1200
Turn Type
NA
Protected Phases
8
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
8
Switch Phase
117
Minimum Initial (s)
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
59.5
Total Split (s)
75.0
Total Split (%)
44.1%
Yellow Time (s)
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
9.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
-9.5
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
C -Max
Act Effct Green (s)
71.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.42
v/c Ratio
0.82
Control Delay
49.2
Queue Delay
0.0
Total Delay
49.2
LOS
D
Approach Delay
49.2
Approach LOS
D
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 3:WBT and 8:EBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
Intersection Signal Delay: 28.9 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.6% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
splits ana rnases: 1: u.b. 14/ rrospect Avenue & central Koaa
2 #1 #2 #1 #2. #1
*4 4_ X11-
�1 �2 fti3P,
14s.. 5 1 s 75s 1 N=30s
1 #2 #1 #2 #1 #2
05 06 fill 08 R
23s I 42s 1 N75s
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 133 of
28 0 1096
108
64
30 0 1191
117
70
0 0 1191
117
70
NA
Prot
Perm
2356
4
1
2
3
5
6
4
2356
4
4
15.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
37.5
37.5
7.5
52.5
38.5
7.5
21.5
30.0
30.0
14.0
51.0
75.0
23.0
42.0
17.6%
17.6%
8%
30%
44%
14%
25%
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
9.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
-2.5
-2.5
11.0
11.0
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
None
None
None
None
C -Max
None
None
136.0
19.0
19.0
0.80
0.11
0.11
0.42
0.59
0.40
0.7
77.4
70.1
0.5
0.0
0.0
1.2
77.4
70.1
A
E
E
1.2
74.7
A
E
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 3:WBT and 8:EBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
Intersection Signal Delay: 28.9 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.6% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
splits ana rnases: 1: u.b. 14/ rrospect Avenue & central Koaa
2 #1 #2 #1 #2. #1
*4 4_ X11-
�1 �2 fti3P,
14s.. 5 1 s 75s 1 N=30s
1 #2 #1 #2 #1 #2
05 06 fill 08 R
23s I 42s 1 N75s
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 133 of
Econolite #197 -
PM Period
2: US 14/ Prospect Ave. & Central Road
6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
92
948 100
0 924
72 80
596
36 136
716
4
Adj. Flow (vph)
100
1030 109
0 1004
78 87
648
39 148
778
4
Lane Group Flow (vph)
100
1139 0
0 1082
0 87
687
0 148
782
0
Turn Type
custom
NA
NA
Prot
NA
Prot
NA
Protected Phases
4
48
3
1
6
5
2
Permitted Phases
8
Detector Phase
4
48
3
1
6
5
2
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
15.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
37.5
38.5
7.5
21.5
7.5
52.5
Total Split (s)
30.0
75.0
14.0
42.0
23.0
51.0
Total Split (%)
17.6%
44.1%
8.2%
24.7%
13.5%
30.0%
Yellow Time (s)
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
9.0
9.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
-2.5
-9.5
-0.5
-2.5
-0.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
11.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
None
None
None
Act Effct Green (s)
83.0
94.0
71.0
10.0
38.0
19.0
47.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.49
0.55
0.42
0.06
0.22
0.11
0.28
v/c Ratio
0.38
0.59
0.74
0.84
0.87
0.75
0.80
Control Delay
17.7
0.8
38.2
129.2
76.3
57.6
59.6
Queue Delay
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
17.7
1.3
38.2
129.2
76.3
57.6
59.6
LOS
B
A
D
F
E
E
E
Approach Delay
2.7
38.2
82.3
59.3
Approach LOS
A
D
F
E
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 3:WBT and 8:EBT, Start of 1st Green, Master Intersection
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
Intersection Signal Delay: 40.6 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.7% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
Jpiiis ana F'nases: z: ub "14/ F'rospecl Ave. & l:en[ral Koaa
2,*1 #2 #1 2 #1 2
4_1-
14s.. 5 1 s 75s 34s
1 #2 #1 #2 #1 #2
.14- 4NO5 06 ftis (R
23s 42s 75s
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 134 of
Econolite #197 - PM Period
2: US 14/ Prospect Ave. & Central Road 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
15.0
59.5
75.0
44%
4.5
9.0
C -Max
Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 135 of
Econolite #197 -
PM Period
I IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue
6/29/16
II
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
48
40
20 28
60
24
4
596
4
20
628 28
Adj. Flow (vph)
52
43
22 30
65
26
4
648
4
22
683 30
Lane Group Flow (vph)
52
65
0 30
65
26
4
652
0
22
713 0
Turn Type
Prot
NA
Perm
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
custom
NA
Protected Phases
3
312
12
8
56711 12411
Permitted Phases
12
12
8
56711
Detector Phase
3
312
12
12
12
8
8
56711 12411
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
15.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.0
42.0
42.0
42.0
37.5
37.5
Total Split (s)
13.0
42.0
42.0
42.0
35.0
35.0
Total Split (%)
7.6%
24.7%
24.7%
24.7%
20.6%
20.6%
Yellow Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
2.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
-2.0
-2.0
-2.0
-2.0
-2.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
4.0
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lag
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None
None
None
None
C -Max
C -Max
Act Effct Green (s)
8.9
37.7
17.9
17.9
17.9
35.0
35.0
83.5
124.3
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.05
0.22
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.21
0.21
0.49
0.73
v/c Ratio
0.57
0.09
0.22
0.33
0.16
0.03
0.90
0.03
0.28
Control Delay
91.2
28.8
71.9
74.2
69.4
58.0
81.3
18.8
0.2
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
Total Delay
91.2
28.8
71.9
74.2
69.4
58.0
81.3
18.8
0.5
LOS
F
C
E
E
E
E
F
B
A
Approach Delay
56.6
72.6
81.1
1.0
Approach LOS
E
E
F
A
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90
Intersection Signal Delay: 42.6 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.1 % ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue
.3 #44 3 #4 #3 #4 #3 #4 1#3 #4 #3 #4
T � •
-4402 1 7 T 04 R'e 11 X 12
13s 1 37s 1 51s 4 sMIJU13s 42s
\4W 47-11
4 w 6 i 6 R'e
13•s 37s 16's I 13,5s
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 136 of
Econolite #197 - PM Period
I IL 83 & U.S. 14/ Prospect Avenue/Prospect Avenue 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
1 2 4 5 6 7 11
3.0
15.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
1.0
6.0
41.5
40.5
6.0
34.5
7.5
14.0
13.0
37.0
51.0
13.0
37.0
16.0
14.0
8%
22%
30%
8%
22%
9%
8%
3.0
4.5
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.5
4.5
0.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
1.0
8.5
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lead
None
None
C -Max
None
None
None
None
Synchro 8 Report
Page 5
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 137 of
Econolite #197 -
PM Period
4: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14
6/29/16
II
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
8
584 84
48
784
112
88
556
24
48
544 4
Adj. Flow (vph)
9
635 91
52
852
122
96
604
26
52
591 4
Lane Group Flow (vph)
9
726 0
52
974
0
96
630
0
52
595 0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
custom
NA
Prot
NA
Protected Phases
5
2
1
6
31112
81112
7
4
Permitted Phases
2
6
8
3
Detector Phase
5
2
1
6
31112
811 12
7
4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
3.0
15.0
Minimum Split (s)
6.0
41.5
6.0
34.5
7.5
40.5
Total Split (s)
13.0
37.0
13.0
37.0
16.0
51.0
Total Split (%)
7.6% 21.8%
7.6%
21.8%
9.4%
30.0%
Yellow Time (s)
3.0
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.5
4.5
All -Red Time (s)
0.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
1.0
-2.5
1.0
-2.5
-0.5
-2.5
Total Lost Time (s)
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
None
None
None
None
None
C -Max
Act Effct Green (s)
44.7
39.5
59.3
53.5
86.7
90.7
10.2
47.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.26
0.23
0.35
0.31
0.51
0.53
0.06
0.28
v/c Ratio
0.09
0.90
0.25
0.89
0.15
0.34
0.50
0.61
Control Delay
16.5
39.0
43.7
60.6
1.8
0.6
77.1
54.3
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
0.3
0.5
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
16.5
39.0
43.7
64.8
2.2
1.1
77.1
54.3
LOS
B
D
D
E
A
A
E
D
Approach Delay
38.8
63.7
1.3
56.1
Approach LOS
D
E
A
E
Cycle Length: 170
Actuated Cycle Length: 170
Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 4:SBT and 8:NBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 160
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90
Intersection Signal Delay: 41.8 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.9% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 4: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14
.3 #44 3 #4 #3 #4 #3 #4 1#3 #4 #3 #4
T � •
-4402 1 7 T 04 R'e 11 X 12
13s 1 37s 1 51s 4 sMIJU13s 42s
\4W 47-11
4 w 6 i 8 R'e
13•s 37s 16's I 13,5s
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 6
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 138 of
Econolite #197 - PM Period
4: IL 83 & US 14/ Prospect Ave./US 14 6/29/16
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
3 8 11 12
3.0
15.0
1.0
3.0
9.0
37.5
14.0
42.0
13.0
35.0
14.0
42.0
8%
21%
8%
25%
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
1.5
2.0
8.5
8.5
Lag Lag Lead
None C -Max None None
Synchro 8 Report
Page 7
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 139 of
Econolite #197 - PM Period
5: Emerson Street & US 14
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
16 516
17 561
17 604
pm+pt NA
5 2
2
5 2
3.0 15.0
6.0 28.5
13.0 41.0
15.3% 48.2%
3.0 4.5
0.0 2.0
1.0 -2.5
4.0 4.0
Lead Lag
None C -Max
51.7 46.8
0.61 0.55
0.04 0.31
1.9 2.8
0.0 0.0
1.9 2.8
A A
2.8
A
40 132
852
43 143
926
0 143
978
pm+pt
NA
1
6
6
2.0
1
6
3.0
15.0
6.0
31.5
13.0
41.0
15.3%
48.2%
3.0
4.5
0.0
2.0
1.0
-2.5
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
C -Max
57.9
56.0
0.68
0.66
0.26
0.42
6.8
8.9
0.0
0.1
6.8
9.0
A
A
8.7
A
6
48 40
164
52 43
178
0 43
208
Perm
NA
4.5
8
8
2.0
8
8
8.0
8.0
34.5
34.5
31.0
31.0
36.5%
36.5%
4.5
4.5
2.0
2.0
-2.5
-2.5
4.0
4.0
None None
19.1 19.1
0.22 0.22
0.19 0.49
26.9 30.3
0.3 0.0
27.2 30.3
C C
29.8
C
Cycle Length: 85
Actuated Cycle Length: 85
Offset: 33 (39%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 75
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.49
Intersection Signal Delay: 11.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.7% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 5: Emerson Street & US 14
6
28 16
160
30 17
174
0 17
187
Perm
NA
4.5
4
4
2.0
4
4
8.0
8.0
36.5
36.5
31.0
31.0
36.5%
36.5%
4.5
4.5
2.0
2.0
-2.5
-2.5
4.0
4.0
None None
19.1 19.1
0.22 0.22
0.08 0.44
24.5 29.8
0.0 0.7
24.5 30.5
C C
30.0
C
6/29/16
12
13
0
1 IF
X02 R)
■ 04
13s
41s
31s
05
06(R)
t08
13s
41
31s
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 8
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 140 of
Econolite #197 - PM Period
6: IL 83 & Central Road
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Adj. Flow (vph)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
Minimum Split (s)
Total Split (s)
Total Split (%)
Yellow Time (s)
All -Red Time (s)
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay
Queue Delay
Total Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
288 832
313 904
313 921
pm+pt NA
7 4
4
7 4
3.0 15.0
6.0 30.0
14.0 31.0
16.5% 36.5%
3.0 4.5
0.0 1.5
1.0 -2.0
4.0 4.0
Lead Lag
None C -Max
39.3 31.3
0.46 0.37
1.03 0.71
87.2 34.4
0.0 0.0
87.2 34.4
F C
47.8
D
16 104
824
17 113
896
0 113
948
pm+pt
NA
3
8
8
1.5
3
8
3.0
15.0
6.0
29.0
14.0
31.0
16.5%
36.5%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
C -Max
34.5
27.0
0.41
0.32
0.44
0.85
18.1
36.0
0.0
0.0
18.1
36.0
B
D
34.1
C
MEE
48 88
632
52 96
687
0 96
744
pm+pt
NA
5
2
2
1.5
5
2
3.0
15.0
6.0
30.0
13.0
27.0
15.3%
31.8%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
Max
31.1
23.9
0.37
0.28
0.39
0.76
21.5
32.9
0.0
0.0
21.5
32.9
C
C
31.6
C
Cycle Length: 85
Actuated Cycle Length: 85
Offset: 75 (88%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of 1st Green
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03
Intersection Signal Delay: 37.5 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.8% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: IL 83 & Central Road
52 136
580
57 148
630
0 148
843
pm+pt
NA
1
6
6
1.5
1
6
3.0
15.0
6.0
31.0
13.0
27.0
15.3%
31.8%
3.0
4.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
-2.0
4.0
4.0
Lead
Lag
None
Max
33.5
26.6
0.39
0.31
0.56
0.79
24.5
34.7
0.0
0.0
24.5
34.7
C
C
33.2
C
6/29/16
196
213
0
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 9
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 141 of
13I
2:7 Is
14 Is
31 Is
05
06
07
1 03 R
13 Is 1
2:7 Is M-14
Is
al Is
Timing Plan: 122
Sam Schwartz
Synchro 8 Report
Page 9
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 141 of
Econolite #197 -PM Period
Arterial Bandwidths /dth Percentile Green Times 5129116
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Offset II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II
2: US 14/ Prospect Ave ] Nctf1
@ Central Road W Arterial Band 0 s
0
4: US 14 EB Arte -al Ba d 21 s
@ IL 83 WB Arte -al Ba d 0 s
63
5: US 14 a EB Arterial and 1 s
@ Emerson Street I ff1 "A1 I fft ii
I MONISM
33
Econolite #197 -PM Period M:\ CHICAGO PROJECTS\12-034750 -10072013 SCAM171-US 14 & IL 83\Svnch.kPM 2016.svn
Sam Schwartz
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 142 of:
Econolite #197 -PM Period
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Offset
6: IL 83
@ Central Road
75
IL 83
US 14
IL 83 _
Prospect Avenue 41
Sam Schwartz
NB Arterial
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 143 of:
Econolite #197 -PM Period
Main Street
Cross Street Approach 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Offset.... 1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....1....
1: Central Road
@ U.S. 14/ Prospect A ~0=
?: Central Road _
US 14/ Prospect Ave
6: Central Road _
@IL 83
75
Sam Schwartz
000001 I 01
WB Arteri Band 31
EB Arter al and s
1 WB Arteiial sand M s 1
Band 32 s
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 144 of:
Speed Delay Data
For
SCAT 2013
Work Order 172
Econolite Master 197
US 14 @ IL 83 / Prospect Ave.
June 2016
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 145 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM EB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : US 14 AM EB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Central Road
2
2100
IL 83
Before
159.3
1.3
9.0
111.3
96.3
159.3
159.3
After
86.7
0.3
16.5
38.7
33.3
86.7
86.7
Change
-72.7
-1.0
7.5
-72.7
-63.0
-72.7
-72.7
3
314
Emerson Street
Before
9.0
0.0
23.8
2.0
0.0
9.0
9.0
After
8.0
0.0
26.8
0.3
0.0
7.7
7.7
Chan a
-1.0
0.0
3.0
-1.7
0.0
-1.3
-1.3
Totals
2,414
Before
168.3
1.3
9.8
113.3
96.3
168.3
168.3
After
94.7
0.3
17.4
39.0
33.3
94.3
94.3
Change
-73.7
-1.0
7.6
-74.3
-63.0
-74.0
74.0
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 146 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM EB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : US 14 AM EB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Central Road
2
2100
IL 83
Before
0.0385
3.6545
32.9120
1.0158
After
0.0261
2.5505
23.0806
1.1783
Change
-0.0124
-1.1039
-9.8315
0.1625
3
314
Emerson Street
Before
0.0034
0.4098
3.2122
0.2950
After
0.0027
0.2677
2.5858
0.1558
Chan a
-0.0007
-0.1421
-0.6263
0.1392
Totals
2,414
Before
0.0419
4.0643
36.1242
1.3109
After
0.0288
2.8183
25.6664
1.3341
Change
-0.0131
-1.2460
-10.4578
0.0233
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 147 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM EB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Central Road 0
:00
1,500-
2,000-
IL
,500-
2,000-IL 83
Emerson Street
2,500 -
3, 000 -
3, 500 -
4,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name : US 14 AM EB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 148 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM EB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Central Road 0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
IL 83
Emerson Street
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Study Name : US 14 AM EB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
nu i t i min.) izu i << min.) iuu i is min.) z4u i (4 min.) auu i to min.)
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 149 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM WB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name: US 14 AM WB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Emerson Street
2
494
IL 83
Before
62.3
0.7
5.4
51.0
41.0
62.3
62.3
After
50.0
1.0
6.7
38.0
26.0
50.0
50.0
Change
-12.3
0.3
1.3
-13.0
-15.0
-12.3
-12.3
3
1841
Central Road
Before
85.7
0.7
14.7
43.7
35.3
84.7
84.7
After
82.3
0.7
15.2
40.7
34.0
80.3
82.0
Chan a
-3.3
0.0
0.6
-3.0
-1.3
-4.3
-2.7
Totals
2,335
Before
148.0
1.3
10.8
94.7
76.3
147.0
147.0
After
132.3
1.7
12.0
78.7
60.0
130.3
132.0
Change
-15.7
0.3
1.3
-16.0
-16.3
-16.7
-15.0
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 150 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM WB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name: US 14 AM WB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Emerson Street
2
494
IL 83
Before
0.0140
1.4091
11.6532
0.4020
After
0.0125
1.3273
9.1056
0.5938
Change
-0.0015
-0.0818
-2.5476
0.1918
3
1841
Central Road
Before
0.0232
2.1685
19.3648
0.8055
After
0.0244
2.4350
21.1360
1.1672
Chane
0.0012
0.2665
1.7712
0.3617
Totals
2,335
Before
0.0373
3.5775
31.0180
1.2075
After
0.0369
3.7622
30.2415
1.7610
Change
-0.0003
0.1847
-0.7764
0.5536
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 151 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM WB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Emerson Street 0
L 83 500-
00-
1,500-
1,500-
2,000-
2,000-
Central
Central Road
2,500 -
3, 000 -
3, 500 -
Study Name: US 14 AM WB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
4,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Page 152 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM WB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Emerson Street 0
L 83 500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Central Road
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Study Name: US 14 AM WB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
nu i t i min.) izu i << min.) iuu i is min.) z4u i (4 min.) auu i to min.)
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 153 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM NB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : IL 83 AM NB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Prospect Ave.
2
288
US 14
Before
10.0
0.0
19.6
3.0
0.0
10.0
10.0
After
11.3
0.0
17.3
4.3
0.0
11.3
11.3
Change
1.3
0.0
-2.3
1.3
0.0
1.3
1.3
3
920
Central Rd.
Before
59.0
0.7
10.6
38.3
22.0
58.7
58.7
After
40.0
1.0
15.7
19.0
9.3
39.3
39.3
Chan a
-19.0
0.3
5.1
-19.3
-12.7
-19.3
-19.3
Totals
1,208
Before
69.0
0.7
11.9
41.3
22.0
68.7
68.7
After
51.3
1.0
16.0
23.3
9.3
50.7
50.7
Change
-17.7
0.3
4.1
-18.0
-12.7
-18.0
-18.0
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 154 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM NB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : IL 83 AM NB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Prospect Ave.
2
288
US 14
Before
0.0036
0.4204
2.8632
0.3004
After
0.0039
0.4750
3.0261
0.3426
Chane
0.0003
0.0546
0.1630
0.0422
3
920
Central Rd.
Before
0.0144
1.3871
12.5753
0.4424
After
0.0108
1.0557
8.9647
0.4615
Chan a
-0.0036
-0.3315
-3.6107
0.0191
Totals
1,208
Before
0.0180
1.8075
15.4385
0.7428
After
0.0148
1.5307
11.9908
0.8041
Change
-0.0032
-0.2768
-3.4477
0.0613
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 155 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM NB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Prospect Ave. 0
250-
US
50-US 14
M
750-
Central
50-
Central Rd.
1,250 -
1,500 -
1.750 -
2,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name : IL 83 AM NB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 156 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM NB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Prospect Ave. 0
250
US 14
500
750
1,000
Central Rd.
1,250
1,500
1.750
2,000
Study Name : IL 83 AM NB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
20 40 60 80 100
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 157 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM SB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : IL 83 AM SB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Central Rd.
2
991
US 14
Before
53.0
0.7
12.7
30.0
15.0
53.0
53.0
After
25.0
0.0
27.0
2.7
0.0
22.3
25.0
Change
-28.0
-0.7
14.3
-27.3
-15.0
-30.7
-28.0
3
159
Prospect Ave.
Before
4.7
0.0
23.2
0.7
0.0
4.3
4.3
After
5.3
0.3
20.3
1.7
0.0
4.7
4.7
Chan a
0.7
0.3
-2.9
1.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
Totals
1,150
Before
57.7
0.7
13.6
30.7
15.0
57.3
57.3
After
30.3
0.3
25.8
4.3
0.0
27.0
29.7
Change
-27.3
-0.3
12.3
-26.3
-15.0
-30.3
27.7
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 158 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM SB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : IL 83 AM SB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Central Rd.
2
991
US 14
Before
0.0154
1.6552
12.3274
0.9010
After
0.0109
1.2005
10.1682
0.8659
Change
-0.0045
-0.4548
-2.1592
-0.0350
3
159
Prospect Ave.
Before
0.0015
0.1827
1.2811
0.1296
After
0.0012
0.1087
0.8600
0.0407
Chan a
-0.0003
-0.0740
-0.4210
0.0890
Totals
1,150
Before
0.0170
1.8379
13.6085
1.0306
After
0.0121
1.3091
11.0283
0.9066
Change
-0.0049
-0.5288
-2.5802
-0.1240
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 159 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM SB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Central Rd. 0
250-
500-
750-
US
50-500-750-US 14 1,000-
Prospect
,000-Prospect Ave.
1,250 -
1,500 -
1.750 -
2,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name : IL 83 AM SB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 160 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After AM SB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Central Rd. 0
250
500
750
US 14 1,000
Prospect Ave.
1,250
1,500
1.750
2,000
Study Name : IL 83 AM SB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
20 40 60 80 100
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 161 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD EB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : US 14 MD EB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Central Road
2
2082
IL 83
Before
142.0
1.3
10.0
94.7
78.7
142.0
142.0
After
78.3
1.0
18.1
30.7
15.3
78.3
78.3
Change
-63.7
-0.3
8.1
-64.0
-63.3
-63.7
-63.7
3
373
Emerson Street
Before
38.3
0.7
6.6
32.0
25.0
37.3
37.3
After
9.3
0.0
27.2
1.0
0.0
8.7
8.7
Chan a
-29.0
-0.7
20.6
-31.0
-25.0
-28.7
-28.7
Totals
2,455
Before
180.3
2.0
9.3
126.7
103.7
179.3
179.3
After
87.7
1.0
19.1
31.7
15.3
87.0
87.0
Change
-92.7
-1.0
9.8
-95.0
-88.3
-92.3
-92.3
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 162 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD EB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : US 14 MD EB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Central Road
2
2082
IL 83
Before
0.0360
3.5424
30.7195
1.2514
After
0.0259
2.6142
20.8071
1.4829
Change
-0.0101
-0.9282
-9.9123
0.2314
3
373
Emerson Street
Before
0.0083
0.8475
6.7254
0.2558
After
0.0035
0.4275
3.3900
0.3211
Chan a
-0.0048
-0.4200
-3.3354
0.0653
Totals
2,455
Before
0.0443
4.3899
37.4448
1.5072
After
0.0294
3.0417
24.1971
1.8039
Change
-0.0149
-1.3482
-13.2477
0.2967
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 163 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD EB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Central Road 0
:00
1,500-
2,000-
IL
,500-
2,000-IL 83
Emerson Street
2,500 -
3, 000 -
3, 500 -
4,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name : US 14 MD EB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 164 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD EB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Central Road 0
:0l
=1l
1,500
2,000
IL 83
Emerson Street
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,00(
Study Name : US 14 MD EB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
nu i t i min.) izu i << min.) iuu i is min.) z4u i (4 min.) auu i to min.)
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 165 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD WB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name: US 14 MD WB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Emerson Street
2
458
IL 83
Before
13.7
0.0
22.8
2.7
0.0
13.7
13.7
After
36.0
0.3
8.7
25.0
4.3
36.0
36.0
Chane
22.3
0.3
-14.2
22.3
4.3
22.3
22.3
3
1788
Central Road
Before
84.7
0.7
14.4
44.0
37.0
84.7
84.7
After
76.7
0.7
15.9
36.3
25.3
76.0
76.0
Chan a
-8.0
0.0
1.5
-7.7
-11.7
-8.7
-8.7
Totals
2,246
Before
98.3
0.7
15.6
46.7
37.0
98.3
98.3
After
112.7
1.0
13.6
61.3
29.7
112.0
112.0
Chane
14.3
0.3
-2.0
14.7
-7.3
13.7
13.7
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 166 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD WB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name: US 14 MD WB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Emerson Street
2
458
IL 83
Before
0.0072
0.9921
7.0128
0.8674
After
0.0094
1.0125
7.4778
0.4950
Chane
0.0022
0.0204
0.4650
-0.3725
3
1788
Central Road
Before
0.0230
2.0697
18.2695
0.6991
After
0.0215
2.0099
18.3253
0.8044
Chan a
-0.0015
-0.0598
0.0558
0.1053
Totals
2,246
Before
0.0302
3.0618
25.2823
1.5665
After
0.0309
3.0224
25.8031
1.2994
Chane
0.0007
-0.0393
0.5208
-0.2672
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 167 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD WB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Emerson Street 0
IL 83
500-
1,000-
1,500-
2,000-
Central
00-
1,000-1,500-2,000-Central Road
2,500 -
3, 000 -
3, 500 -
4,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name: US 14 MD WB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 168 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD WB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Emerson Street 0
IL 83
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
Central Road
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Study Name: US 14 MD WB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
30 60 90 120 150
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 169 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD NB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : IL 83 MD NB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Prospect Ave.
2
312
US 14
Before
10.7
0.0
19.9
3.7
0.0
10.7
10.7
After
8.3
0.0
25.5
1.3
0.0
8.3
8.3
Change
-2.3
0.0
5.6
-2.3
0.0
-2.3
-2.3
3
893
Central Rd.
Before
45.0
1.0
13.5
25.0
12.7
44.3
44.3
After
26.7
0.3
22.8
6.3
0.0
26.3
26.3
Chan a
-18.3
-0.7
9.3
-18.7
-12.7
-18.0
-18.0
Totals
1,205
Before
55.7
1.0
14.8
28.7
12.7
55.0
55.0
After
35.0
0.3
23.5
7.7
0.0
34.7
34.7
Change
-20.7
-0.7
8.7
-21.0
-12.7
-20.3
20.3
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 170 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD NB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : IL 83 MD NB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Prospect Ave.
2
312
US 14
Before
0.0040
0.4829
3.0901
0.3612
After
0.0026
0.2314
2.0783
0.1045
Change
-0.0014
-0.2515
-1.0118
-0.2567
3
893
Central Rd.
Before
0.0113
1.0606
8.7285
0.3801
After
0.0079
0.7207
6.5725
0.3275
Chan a
-0.0034
-0.3399
-2.1559
0.0526
Totals
1,205
Before
0.0153
1.5435
11.8186
0.7413
After
0.0106
0.9521
8.6508
0.4320
Change
-0.0048
-0.5914
-3.1677
-0.3093
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 171 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD NB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Prospect Ave. 0
250-
US
50-US 14
M
750-
2,000
50-
Central Rd.
1,250 -
1,500 -
1.750 -
Study Name : IL 83 MD NB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
2,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Page 172 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD NB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Prospect Ave. 0
250
US 14
500
750
1,000
Central Rd.
1,250
1,500
1.750
2,000
Study Name : IL 83 MD NB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
30 60 90 120 150
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 173 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD SB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : IL 83 MD SB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Central Rd.
2
977
US 14
Before
75.3
1.0
8.8
53.0
38.0
75.3
75.3
After
31.7
0.3
21.0
9.0
0.0
31.7
31.7
Change
-43.7
-0.7
12.2
-44.0
-38.0
-43.7
-43.7
3
180
Prospect Ave.
Before
5.7
0.0
21.7
1.7
0.0
4.7
4.7
After
5.3
0.0
23.0
1.0
0.0
5.0
5.0
Chan a
-0.3
0.0
1.4
-0.7
0.0
0.3
0.3
Totals
1,157
Before
81.0
1.0
9.7
54.7
38.0
80.0
80.0
After
37.0
0.3
21.3
10.0
0.0
36.7
36.7
Change
-44.0
-0.7
11.6
-44.7
-38.0
-43.3
-43.3
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 174 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD SB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : IL 83 MD SB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Central Rd.
2
977
US 14
Before
0.0205
2.2070
15.6619
1.1091
After
0.0113
1.2448
8.7988
0.8413
Change
-0.0092
-0.9622
-6.8631
-0.2678
3
180
Prospect Ave.
Before
0.0021
0.2892
1.7819
0.2475
After
0.0014
0.1157
1.0761
0.0355
Chan a
-0.0007
-0.1735
-0.7058
0.2120
Totals
1,157
Before
0.0226
2.4962
17.4438
1.3567
After
0.0127
1.3605
9.8750
0.8768
Change
-0.0100
-1.1356
-7.5689
-0.4798
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 175 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD SB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Central Rd. 0
250-
500-
750-
US
50-500-750-US 14
1,000-
Prospect
,000-Prospect Ave.
1,250 -
1,500 -
1.750 -
2,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name : IL 83 MD SB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 176 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After MD SB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Central Rd. 0
250
500
750
US 14
1,000
Prospect Ave.
1,250
1,500
1.750
2,000
Study Name : IL 83 MD SB
Study Date : 6/15/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
20 40 60 80 100
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 177 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 Mount Prospect
Before and After PM EB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : US 14 PM EB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Central Road
2
2118
IL 83
Before
125.0
0.7
11.6
76.3
65.0
125.0
125.0
After
74.0
0.7
19.5
25.7
18.3
73.3
74.0
Change
-51.0
0.0
8.0
-50.7
-46.7
-51.7
-51.0
3
311
Emerson Street
Before
9.3
0.0
22.7
2.0
0.0
9.0
9.0
After
7.7
0.0
27.7
0.3
0.0
7.3
7.3
Chan a
-1.7
0.0
4.9
-1.7
0.0
-1.7
-1.7
Totals
2,429
Before
134.3
0.7
12.3
78.3
65.0
134.0
134.0
After
81.7
0.7
20.3
26.0
18.3
80.7
81.3
Change
-52.7
0.0
8.0
-52.3
-46.7
-53.3
52.7
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 178 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 Mount Prospect
Before and After PM EB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : US 14 PM EB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Central Road
2
2118
IL 83
Before
0.0323
3.0710
27.0898
1.0270
After
0.0235
2.2703
19.6556
1.1415
Change
-0.0087
-0.8007
-7.4342
0.1145
3
311
Emerson Street
Before
0.0029
0.2971
2.5319
0.1657
After
0.0033
0.4238
3.7469
0.3295
Chane
0.0004
0.1267
1.2150
0.1638
Totals
2,429
Before
0.0352
3.3681
29.6217
1.1926
After
0.0268
2.6941
23.4025
1.4710
Change
-0.0084
-0.6740
-6.2192
0.2784
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 179 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 Mount Prospect
Before and After PM EB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Central Road 0
:00
1,500-
2,000-
IL
,500-
2,000-IL 83
Emerson Street
2,500 -
3, 000 -
3, 500 -
4,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name : US 14 PM EB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 180 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 Mount Prospect
Before and After PM EB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Central Road 0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
IL 83
Emerson Street
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
Study Name : US 14 PM EB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
nu i t i min.) izu i << min.) iuu i is min.) z4u i (4 min.) auu i to min.)
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 181 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM WB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name: US 14 PM WB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Emerson Street
2
486
IL 83
Before
99.3
1.0
3.3
87.7
70.3
99.3
99.3
After
69.0
0.7
4.8
57.3
44.0
69.0
69.0
Change
-30.3
-0.3
1.5
-30.3
-26.3
-30.3
-30.3
3
1812
Central Road
Before
77.3
0.7
16.0
36.0
23.7
76.7
76.7
After
50.0
0.3
24.7
10.0
6.3
47.0
49.3
Chan a
-27.3
-0.3
8.7
-26.0
-17.3
-29.7
-27.3
Totals
2,298
Before
176.7
1.7
8.9
123.7
94.0
176.0
176.0
After
119.0
1.0
13.2
67.3
50.3
116.0
118.3
Change
-57.7
-0.7
4.3
-56.3
-43.7
-60.0
57.7
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 182 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM WB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name: US 14 PM WB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Emerson Street
2
486
IL 83
Before
0.0223
2.3781
18.4551
0.8095
After
0.0163
1.7347
13.6945
0.6492
Change
-0.0060
-0.6434
-4.7606
-0.1602
3
1812
Central Road
Before
0.0221
2.1521
18.5299
0.9731
After
0.0170
1.6147
14.8614
0.8675
Chan a
-0.0051
-0.5374
-3.6685
0.1056
Totals
2,298
Before
0.0444
4.5302
36.9850
1.7825
After
0.0333
3.3494
28.5560
1.5167
Change
-0.0111
-1.1808
-8.4291
-0.2658
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 183 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM WB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Emerson Street 0
L 83 500-
1,000-
1,500-
2,000-
Central
00-
1,000-1,500-2,000-Central Road
2,500 -
3, 000 -
3, 500 -
4,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name: US 14 PM WB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 184 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
US 14 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM WB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 500 feet
Emerson Street 0
L 83 500
1,000
1,500-
2,000-
Central
,5002,000Central Road
2,500-
3,000-
3,500-
4,000
,5003,0003,5004,000
Study Name: US 14 PM WB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
nu i t i min.) izu i << min.) iuu i is min.) z4u i (4 min.) auu i to min.)
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 185 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM NB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : IL 83 PM NB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Prospect Avenue
2
280
US 14
Before
10.0
0.0
19.1
3.0
0.0
10.0
10.0
After
9.7
0.0
19.7
2.7
0.0
9.7
9.7
Change
-0.3
0.0
0.7
-0.3
0.0
-0.3
-0.3
3
923
Central Road
Before
51.0
0.7
12.3
30.0
21.3
50.7
50.7
After
38.0
1.3
16.6
17.0
5.7
37.3
37.3
Chan a
-13.0
0.7
4.2
-13.0
-15.7
-13.3
-13.3
Totals
1,203
Before
61.0
0.7
13.4
33.0
21.3
60.7
60.7
After
47.7
1.3
17.2
19.7
5.7
47.0
47.0
Change
-13.3
0.7
3.8
-13.3
-15.7
-13.7
-13.7
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 186 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM NB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : IL 83 PM NB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Prospect Avenue
2
280
US 14
Before
0.0042
0.5503
3.3223
0.4536
After
0.0040
0.4998
2.9876
0.4042
Change
-0.0002
-0.0506
-0.3347
-0.0494
3
923
Central Road
Before
0.0128
1.1931
10.7158
0.3842
After
0.0105
0.9951
7.7099
0.4511
Chan a
-0.0023
-0.1980
-3.0058
0.0669
Totals
1,203
Before
0.0170
1.7434
14.0381
0.8377
After
0.0144
1.4949
10.6976
0.8553
Change
-0.0026
-0.2485
-3.3405
0.0175
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 187 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM NB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Prospect Avenue 0
250 -
US 14
M
750-
Central
50-
Central Road
1,250 -
1,500 -
1.750 -
2,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name : IL 83 PM NB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 188 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM NB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Prospect Avenue 0
250
US 14
500
750
1,000
Central Road
1,250
1,500
1.750
2,000
Study Name : IL 83 PM NB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
30 60 90 120 150
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 189 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM SB
Overall Output Statistics
Study Name : IL 83 PM SB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 1
Node
Length
Node Name
Travel
# of
Avg
Total
Time <=
Time <=
Time <=
#
Time
Stops
Speed
Delay
0 MPH
35 MPH
55 MPH
1
0
Central Road
2
1008
US 14
Before
93.7
1.0
7.3
70.7
54.7
93.7
93.7
After
32.7
0.3
21.0
9.7
0.7
32.7
32.7
Change
-61.0
-0.7
13.7
-61.0
-54.0
-61.0
-61.0
3
155
Prospect Avenue
Before
5.0
0.0
21.1
1.0
0.0
4.3
4.3
After
4.3
0.0
24.4
0.3
0.0
3.7
3.7
Chan a
-0.7
0.0
3.3
-0.7
0.0
-0.7
-0.7
Totals
1,163
Before
98.7
1.0
8.0
71.7
54.7
98.0
98.0
After
37.0
0.3
21.4
10.0
0.7
36.3
36.3
Change
-61.7
-0.7
13.4
-61.7
-54.0
-61.7
-61.7
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Stops based on a Stop Speed of 5 MPH.
Total Delay based on a Normal Speed of 30 MPH.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 190 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM SB
Fuel Consumption & Emissions
Study Name : IL 83 PM SB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 2
Node
Length
Node Name
Fuel
HC
CO
NOx
#
(gal)
(grams)
(grams)
(grams)
1
0
Central Road
2
1008
US 14
Before
0.0237
2.4971
19.4432
1.0551
After
0.0119
1.2996
9.8390
0.8727
Change
-0.0118
-1.1975
-9.6041
-0.1824
3
155
Prospect Avenue
Before
0.0018
0.2260
1.3900
0.1827
After
0.0012
0.1049
0.8692
0.0490
Chan a
-0.0006
-0.1211
-0.5208
-0.1337
Totals
1,163
Before
0.0255
2.7231
20.8332
1.2378
After
0.0131
1.4045
1 0. 7082
0.9217
Change
-0.0124
-1.3186
-10.1250
-0.3161
Stats based on 3 BEFORE runs & 3 AFTER runs.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 191 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM SB
Speed/Distance Profiles of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Central Road 0
250-
-ME
50-
M
750-
US
50-
US 14 1,000 -
Prospect Avenue
1,250 -
1,500 -
1.750 -
2,000
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016
Study Name : IL 83 PM SB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 3
Speed (MPH)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Page 192 of
Sam Schwartz Engineering
IL 83 - Mt. Prospect
Before and After PM SB
Time/Space Trajectories of All Runs
Thick (blue) lines = Before Runs; Thin (red) lines = After Runs
Distance
Scale: 1 in. = 250 feet
Central Road 0
250
500
750
US 14 1,000
Prospect Avenue
1,250
1,500
1.750
2,000
Study Name : IL 83 PM SB
Study Date : 6/9/2016
Page No. : 4
Time into Run (secs)
30 60 90 120 150
Solid Line is Normal Speed of 30 MPH
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 193 of
Implemented Controller Databases
For
SCAT 2013
Work Order 172
Econolite Master 197
US 14 @ IL 83 / Prospect Ave.
June 2016
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 194 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
System Parameters
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Master Number . . .
Manual Plan . . . .
Cycle Length. . . .
. . . . 197
Special Functions
Enabled COS 1 2 3 4
. NO 111 OFF OFF OFF OFF
Cycles
1 2 3 4 5 6
. . . .160 170 170 10 10 10 seconds
Cycle Resync Time . . . . . .
. . . . .
0315
Detector Parameters
SD Volume Scale Factor. . . .
. . . . .
12
100 veh/hour
SD Occupancy Scale Factor . .
. . . . .
30
percent
First Det No -Activity Period.
. . . . .
45
minutes
Begin Time of First Nap . . .
. . . . .
0700
hours
Second Det No -Activity Period
. . . . .
255
minutes
Begin Time of Second Nap. . .
. . . . .
2000
hours
Det No -Activity Threshold . .
. . . . .
1
counts/minute
Det Maximum Presence Period .
. . . . .
15
minutes
SD Min Avg Presence Period. .
. . . . .
15
minutes
SD Min Avg Presence Threshold
. . . . .
6
countsx33.3ms
@60Hz x40ms @50Hz
SD Excessive Counts Period. .
. . . . .
15
minutes
SD Excessive Counts Threshold
. . . . .
80
counts/minute
Det Failure Recovery Period .
. . . . .
2
minutes
Conflict Flash Timer. . . . .
. . . . .
0
seconds
TRP Initial and Failure Recovery Delay.
4
sample periods
TRP Retention Period. . . . .
. . . . .
15
minutes
Speed in KPH? . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
NO
Offset
1 2
3
4 5
Cycle 1 Nominal Speeds. . . .
30 30
30
30 30
MPH or KPH
Cycle 2 Nominal Speeds. . . .
30 30
30
30 30
MPH or KPH
Cycle 3 Nominal Speeds. . . .
30 30
30
30 30
MPH or KPH
Cycle 4 Nominal Speeds. . . .
30 30
30
30 30
MPH or KPH
Cycle 5 Nominal Speeds. . . .
30 30
30
30 30
MPH or KPH
Cycle 6 Nominal Speeds. . . .
30 30
30
30 30
MPH or KPH
NIC Backup Enable . . . . . . . 0
NIC Resync Count. . . . . . . . 3
NIC Time Sync Enable. . . . . .YES
minutes 0=disabled
cycles
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 195 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
TOD Weekly/Yearly
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Enable TOD
Plan? .
.
. .
. .
. .
YES
Enable TOD
Special
Functions?.
.
NO
Enable TRP
Default?.
. .
. .
. .
NO
Weekly
Program
Numbers
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sunday ...
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Monday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Tuesday. ..
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Wednesday.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Thursday .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Friday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Saturday
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Week
of
Year
1
2 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16 17
18
Prog 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
19
20 21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 34 35
36
Pr o g 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
37
38 39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51 52 53
Pr o g 1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 196 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
Holiday Programs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Holiday
Month
Day
Program
1
1
1
3
2
7
4
3
3
0
0
1
4
0
0
1
5
12
25
3
6
0
0
1
7
0
0
1
8
0
0
1
9
0
0
1
10
0
0
1
11
0
0
1
12
0
0
1
13
0
0
1
14
0
0
1
15
0
0
1
16
0
0
1
17
0
0
1
18
0
0
1
19
0
0
1
20
0
0
1
21
0
0
1
22
0
0
1
23
0
0
1
24
0
0
1
25
0
0
1
26
0
0
1
27
0
0
1
28
0
0
1
29
0
0
1
30
0
0
1
31
0
0
1
32
0
0
1
33
0
0
1
34
0
0
1
35
0
0
1
36
0
0
1
Note: 0
in month or day
disables holiday
Repeat
X
X
X
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 197 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step
Pgm
Time
COS
Special Maint
Auto NIC XRT SAM
SMLG
SDLG
No.
Function Call
TRP TOD Mode ENA
1 2 3 4
ENA OVRD
1
1
0600
211
0
0
0
2
1
0900
111
0
0
0
3
1
1500
311
0
0
0
4
1
1830
111
0
0
0
5
1
2100
FREE
0
0
0
6
2
0700
111
0
0
0
7
2
2100
FREE
0
0
0
8
3
0900
111
0
0
0
9
3
2000
FREE
0
0
0
10
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
11
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
12
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
13
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
14
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
15
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
16
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
17
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
18
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
19
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
20
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
21
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
22
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
23
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
24
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
25
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
26
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
27
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
28
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
29
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
30
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
31
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
32
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
33
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
34
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
35
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
36
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
37
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
38
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
39
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
40
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
41
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
42
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
43
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
44
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
45
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
46
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
47
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
48
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
49
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
50
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 198 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step
Pgm
Time
COS
Special Maint
Auto NIC XRT SAM
SMLG
SDLG
No.
Function Call
TRP TOD Mode ENA
1 2 3 4
ENA OVRD
51
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
52
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
53
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
54
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
55
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
56
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
57
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
58
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
59
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
60
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
61
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
62
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
63
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
64
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
65
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
66
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
67
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
68
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
69
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
70
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
71
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
72
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
73
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
74
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
75
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
76
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
77
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
78
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
79
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
80
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
81
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
82
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
83
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
84
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
85
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
86
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
87
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
88
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
89
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
90
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
91
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
92
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
93
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
94
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
95
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
96
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
97
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
98
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
99
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
100
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 199 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step
Pgm
Time
COS
Special Maint
Auto NIC XRT SAM
SMLG
SDLG
No.
Function Call
TRP TOD Mode ENA
1 2 3 4
ENA OVRD
101
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
102
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
103
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
104
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
105
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
106
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
107
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
108
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
109
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
110
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
111
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
112
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
113
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
114
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
115
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
116
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
117
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
118
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
119
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
120
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
121
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
122
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
123
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
124
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
125
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
126
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
127
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
128
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
129
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
130
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
131
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
132
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
133
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
134
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
135
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
136
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
137
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
138
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
139
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
140
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
141
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
142
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
143
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
144
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
145
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
146
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
147
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
148
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
149
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
150
0
0000
CLR
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 200 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
System Detectors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 201 of
System
Detector
No.
1
2
3
4
5 6
7
8
9
10
11
Volume Scale Factor
8
9
11
10
11 9
11
12
13
11
15
100 vph
Occ Scale Factor. .
. 75
75
85
85
75 75
85
85
80
80
80
percent
No -Activity Period.
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
minutes
Max Presence Period
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
minutes
System
Detector
No.
12
13
14
15
16 17
18
19
20
21
22
Volume Scale Factor
15
18
13
14
14 12
12
0
0
0
0
100 vph
Occ Scale Factor. .
. 90
80
80
80
80 80
80
0
0
0
0
percent
No -Activity Period.
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
minutes
Max Presence Period
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
minutes
System
Detector
No.
23
24
25
26
27 28
29
30
31
32
Volume Scale Factor
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
100 vph
Occ Scale Factor. ..
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
percent
No -Activity Period.
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
minutes
Max Presence Period
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
minutes
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 201 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
Detector Groups
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SD No.
SD No.
SD No.
SD No.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 202 of
Detector
Group No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Assign
SD
to Lane 1....
3
11
1
9
0
0
0
0
Assign
SD
to Lane 2 . . .
. 4
13
2
10
0
0
0
0
Assign
SD
to Lane 3 . . .
. 5
14
7
15
0
0
0
0
Assign
SD
to Lane 4....
6
0
8
16
0
0
0
0
Required No. Detectors. ..
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Assign
to
Level . . . . .
. 2
2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Assign
to
Direction 1 . .
. 2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Assign
to
Direction 2 . .
. N/A
N/A
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Assign
to
Split Demand A.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Assign
to
Split Demand B.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Assign
to
Arterial Demand
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Assign
to
NON -ART Demand.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SD No.
SD No.
SD No.
SD No.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 202 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
Automatic Programs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sample Period in Cycles?. . . . . . YES
Sample Period . . . . . . . . . . . 3 cycles
TRP Level Alarm Threshold . . . . . 0 level 0=diagnostic disabled
Function Computations:
Traffic Param. . .
Value/Groups . . .
Smoothing Factor
Update Threshold .
Thresholds:
LEV
Level
2>1.
11
1>2.
18
3>2.
27
2>3.
30
4>3.
101
3>4.
101
5>4.
101
4>5.
101
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 203 of
LEV
DR1
DR2
SPA
SPB ART
NRT
. . .
. CON
CON
CON
0
0 0
0
2
2
2
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
. . .
. . 27
15
15
0
0 0
0 percent
. . .
. . 85
79
79
0
0 0
0 percent
Offset
Split
Non -Arterial
1>AV.
2
2>1.
101
NRT>ART.
100
AV>1.
6
1>2.
101
ART>NRT.
100
2>AV.
0
3>2.
101
AV>2.
3
2>3.
101
4>3.
101
3>4.
101
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 203 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
TRP Split/Special Functions
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 204 of
Special
CLEAR
Split/Special
Function
1 . .
. . YES
Split/Special
Function
2 . .
. . YES
Split/Special
Function
3 . .
. . YES
Split/Special
Function
4 . .
. . YES
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 204 of
Special
Functions
SPLIT
1
2
3
4
1
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
1
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
1
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
1
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 204 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
Traffic Responsive Plans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 205 of
Special
Functions
CLEAR
COS
1
2
3
4
Level
1
- Direction 1 . . .
. NO
FREE
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
1
- Direction 2 . . .
. NO
FREE
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
1
- Average . . . . .
. NO
FREE
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
1
- Non Arterial. . .
. NO
FREE
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
2
- Direction 1 . . .
. NO
211
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
2
- Direction 2 . . .
. NO
111
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
2
- Average . . . . .
. NO
111
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
2
- Non Arterial. . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
3
- Direction 1 . . .
. NO
211
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
3
- Direction 2 . . .
. NO
311
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
3
- Average . . . . .
. NO
111
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
3
- Non Arterial. . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
4
- Direction 1 . . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
4
- Direction 2 . . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
4
- Average . . . . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
4
- Non Arterial. . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
5
- Direction 1 . . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
5
- Direction 2 . . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
5
- Average . . . . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Level
5
- Non Arterial. . .
. YES
CLR
OFF
OFF
OFF
OFF
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 205 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
XRT Synchronization
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 206 of
XRT Offset
Master
Cycle OF1
OF2 OF3 OF4
OF5
Submaster Cycle
1......
0
0
0 0
0
0
Submaster Cycle
2......
0
0
0 0
0
0
Submaster Cycle
3......
0
0
0 0
0
0
Submaster Cycle
4......
0
0
0 0
0
0
Submaster Cycle
5......
0
0
0 0
0
0
Submaster Cycle
6......
0
0
0 0
0
0
Minimum Sync Period . . . . .
.
0 cycles 0=disabled
XRT sync
Crossing Artery
Controller. .
.
0 Controller
no. if telemetry
connected.
If zero,
I/O signals are
used.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 206 of
US 14 & IL 83
6/30/2016
16:24
Local
Det
No.
Enable Devices
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
Controller
1......
X
X
X
Device
No.
X
X
Controller
2......
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Telemetry Channel
. . . . X
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Controller. . . .
. . . . X
X
X
Controller
System Detector .....
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Speed Trap. . . .
. . . . .
Controller
Speed Sign. . . .
. . . .
-
-
-
-
8 . . .
. . . .
Device
No.
Controller
9 . . .
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Controller. . . .
. . . .
X
Controller
System Detector .....
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
12 . . .
. . . .
Device
No.
Controller
13 . . .
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Controller. . . .
. . . . .
Controller
System Detector .
. . . . .
Controller
16 . . .
. . . .
Device
No.
Controller
17 . . .
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
System Detector .
. . . . .
Controller
Local Det.
At:
Local
Det
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8
Controller
1......
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Controller
2......
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
Controller
3......
X
X
X
X
X
X
Controller
4 . . .
. . . .
Controller
5 . . .
. . . .
Controller
6 . . .
. . . .
Controller
7 . . .
. . . .
Controller
8 . . .
. . . .
Controller
9 . . .
. . . .
Controller
10 . . .
. . . .
Controller
11 ......
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
Controller
12 . . .
. . . .
Controller
13 . . .
. . . .
Controller
14 . . .
. . . .
Controller
15 . . .
. . . .
Controller
16 . . .
. . . .
Controller
17 . . .
. . . .
Controller
18 . . .
. . . .
Controller
19 . . .
. . . .
Controller
20 . . .
. . . .
Controller
21 . . .
. . . .
Controller
22 . . .
. . . .
Controller
23 . . .
. . . .
Controller
24 . . .
. . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 207 of
US 14 & IL
83
6/30/2016
16:24
Telemetry
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Channel
1
Channel
1
Local
CTR
AUX
SDA1 SDA2
SDB1
SDB2
SDC1
SDC2
SDD1
SDD2
STA
STB
AUX2
Telemetry
Address
01
1
1
1
2
5
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
02
2
2
3
4
7
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
03
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
04
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
11
11
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 208 of
US 14 & IL
83
6/30/2016
16:24
Telemetry
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Channel
2
Channel
2
Local
CTR AUX
SDA1 SDA2
SDB1
SDB2
SDC1
SDC2
SDD1
SDD2
STA
STB
AUX2
Telemetry
Address
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
03
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
04
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
05
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 209 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
Logging Parameters
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Enable:
Sample Period Log. . . . . . . YES
System Detector Log. . . . . . NO
Speed Log. . . . . . . . . . . NO
SD and SPD Log Buffer. . . . . YES
Log Transfer Reference Time. . 0200
Default Sample Log Period. . . 1 sample periods
Default SD & SPD Log Period. . 15 minutes
Event Reporting Delay. . . . . 0 minutes
Log Transfer Interval. . . . . 6 hours
System Detector No.
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Assign System Det to Log. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
System Detector No.
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Assign System Det to Log. . .
Speed
Assign Spd
Spd Log
Spd Log
Trap No.
Trap to Log
Lower Threshold
Higher Threshold
1
NO
0
0
2
NO
0
0
3
NO
0
0
4
NO
0
0
5
NO
0
0
6
NO
0
0
7
NO
0
0
8
NO
0
0
Det 1: System Detector 1
Det 2: System Detector 2
Det 3: System Detector 3
Det 4: System Detector 4
Det 5: System Detector 5
Det 6: System Detector 6
Det 7: System Detector 7
Det 8: System Detector 8
Det 9: System Detector 9
Det 10: System Detector 10
Det 11: System Detector 11
Det 12: System Detector 12
Det 13: System Detector 13
Det 14: System Detector 14
Det 15: System Detector 15
Det 16: System Detector 16
System Detector Names
Det 17: System Detector 17
Det 18: System Detector 18
Det 19: System Detector 19
Det 20: System Detector 20
Det 21: System Detector 21
Det 22: System Detector 22
Det 23: System Detector 23
Det 24: System Detector 24
Det 25: System Detector 25
Det 26: System Detector 26
Det 27: System Detector 27
Det 28: System Detector 28
Det 29: System Detector 29
Det 30: System Detector 30
Det 31: System Detector 31
Det 32: System Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 210 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
Configuration Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Modem Speed . . . . . . . . . . 2400 BPS
Maintenance Report Options:
Priority 1 Events?. . . . . . .
NO
If NO, then
device events.
Delay Next Priority 1 Report? .
NO
Times event
report delay.
Store on Disk?. . . . . . . . .
NO
If NO, then
text message.
Data for Alternate Modem:
Configuration Command:
Reset Delay . . . . . . . . . .
0
1/10 seconds
Command Timeout . . . . . . . .
0
minutes 0=diagnostic
disabled
Enable Daylight Savings . . . .
YES
Begin DST 1st Sunday in April .
NO
System Flash Cmd is Spec. Func.
0
Supervisor Access Code. . . . .
****
Data Change Access Code . . . .
****
Modem Operation:
Event Monitor Number. . . . . .
Log Monitor Number. . . . . . .
16307731627
Maintenance Number. . . . . . .
Network Access Prefix . . . . .
Zone Master IV on DPS? . . . .
. NO
Tone Dialing . . . . . . . . .
. YES
Retry Count . . . . . . . . . .
. 0
Min Retry Interval . . . . . .
. 3
Max Retry Interval . . . . . .
. 3
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 211 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
Alarms and Events
-----------------------------------------------------------------
System:
Backup . . . . . .
. . . . Report
with
higher
priority
Clock Error. . . .
. . . . Report
with
higher
priority
Power On/Off . . .
. . . . Report
with
higher
priority
Power Interrupt <
0.7 sec. Report
with
higher
priority
Device On -Line . .
. . . . Report
with
higher
priority
Controller:
Cycle Fail . . . . . .
. . Alarm
CMU Flash. . . . . . .
. . Alarm
Local Flash. . . . . .
. . Report
with
higher
priority
Commanded Flash. . . .
. . Don't
report
Maintenance Required .
. . Report
with
higher
priority
Coordination Alarm . .
. . Report
with
higher
priority
Coordination Error . .
. . Report
with
higher
priority
Preempt. . . . . . . .
. . Report
with
higher
priority
Local Free . . . . . .
. . Report
with
higher
priority
Alarm 1. . . . . . . .
. . Report
with
higher
priority
Alarm 2. . . . . . . .
. . Don't
report
Commanded Free . . . .
. . Don't
report
Other Devices:
TLM Chn Fail & NIC Backup. Alarm
Local Telemetry Failure. Alarm
System Detector Failure. Report with higher priority
Local Detector Failure . Report with higher priority
Speed Trap Failure . . . . Don't report
Speed Sign Failure . . . . Don't report
Program/Commands:
Program Change . . . . .
Auto Program Change. . .
TRP Level Alarm. . . . .
Special Function Change.
TOD Program Step Change.
Command Mode Change. . .
Report with higher priority
Report with higher priority
Don't report
Don't report
Don't report
Report with higher priority
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 212 of
US 14 & IL 83 6/30/2016 16:24
I/O Assignments
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pin
Signal
1
System
Detector
1
2
System
Detector
2
3
System
Detector
3
4
System
Detector
4
5
System
Detector
5
6
System
Detector
6
7
System
Detector
7
8
System
Detector
8
9
Cycle 1
Output
10
Cycle 2
Output
11
Cycle 4
Output
12
Offset
1 Output
13
Offset
2 Output
14
Offset
4 Output
15
Split 1
Output
16
Split 2
Output
17
Master
Zero Output
18
Force Ext.
Plan
Input
19
Off
20
Off
21
Off
22
Off
23
Off
24
Off
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 213 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Configuration
Overlap
A B C D
Direction . . .
Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only):
Load
Signal
Switch
Controller
Sequence
Priority
Phase/
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8 9
10
Ring 1 Phases
1
2
3
4
9
10 0
0 0
0
Ring 2 Phases
5
6
8
7
0
0 111
12 1 0
0
9 . . . . .
. 2
X
10 . . . . .
. 4
Phase
11 . . . .
8
X
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8 9
10
In Use . . . . .
. X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
Exclusive Ped
Direction . . .
.
Overlap
A B C D
Direction . . .
Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only):
Load
Signal
Switch
Driver
Group
(MMU)
Phase/
Channel
Ovlap
Ped
1 . . . .
1
2 . . . . .
. 2
3 . . . . .
. 3
4 . . . . .
. 4
5 . . . . .
. 5
6 . . . . .
. 6
7 . . . . .
. 7
8 . . . .
8
9 . . . . .
. 2
X
10 . . . . .
. 4
X
11 . . . .
8
X
12 . . . . .
. 3
X
13 . . . . .
. A
14 . . . . .
. B
15 . . . . .
. C
16 . . . . .
. D
11 12
0 0
0 0
11 12
X
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 214 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Configuration Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Enable BIU: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Terminal/Facilities. . . . X X .
Detector Rack. . . . . . . X X .
Type 2 Runs as Type 1. . . .
MMU Disable. . . . . . . . .
Diagnostic Enable. . . . . .
Peer -Peer Comm Enable. . . .
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Peer To Peer Addresses 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255
Port 2:
Port 2
Protocol . . . . . .
. . Terminal
Port 2
Enable . . . . . . .
. . YES
AB3418
Address. . . . . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Group Address. . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Response Delay . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Single Flag Enable .
. . NO
AB3418
Drop -Out Time. . . .
. . 0
AB3418
TOD SF Select. . . .
. . 0
Data Rate
. . . . . . . . .
. . 1200 bps
Data,
Parity, Stop. . . . .
. . 8, 0, 1
Port 3:
Port 3 Protocol . . . . . . .
. Telemetry
Port 3 Enable . . . . . . . .
. YES
Telemetry Address. . . . . .
. 1
System Detector 9-16 Address.
. 0
Telemetry Response Delay. . .
. 2000
AB3418 Address. . . . . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Group Address. . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Response Delay . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Single Flag Enable . .
. NO
AB3418 Drop -Out Time. . . . .
. 0
AB3418 TOD SF Select. . . . .
. 0
Duplex . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Full
Data Rate . . . . . . . . . .
. 9600 bps
Data, Parity, Stop. . . . . .
. 8, 0, 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 215 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Configuration Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Event Enabling
Critical RFE'S (MMU/TF) . . . . .
Non -Critical RFE'S (DET/TEST) . .
Detector Errors . . . . . . . . .
Coordination Errors . . . . . . .
MMU Flash Faults. . . . . . . . .
Local Flash Faults. . . . . . . .
Preempt . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Power On/Off . . . . . . . . . . .
Low Battery . . . . . . . . . . .
Supervisor Access Code. . . ****
Data Change Access Code ****
Alarm Enabling
ALARM
1 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
2 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
3 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
4 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
5 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
6 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
7 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
8 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
9 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
10 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
11 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
12 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
13 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
14 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
15 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
16 . . . . . . . . . . .
MMU Compatibility Program (Info Only)
Channel Is Allowed to Time With Channel
16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2
1 X X X X .
2... X X X X X .
3... X X X X X .
4... X X X X .
5 . . . X X .
6 . . . X X X
7 . . . .
8 X X X X
9 . . . X .
10. . . X X
11. X X X
12. . . X X
13. . . X X
14. . . X
15. . .
Version Info:
Software Assy. Part No. Version
Boot 27831 2.83
Program 45591 1.9
Application . 3
Help 27891 6.33
Configuration 27919 C91411
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 216 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
By -Phase Timing Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Direction
Minimum Green
5
15
10
8
5
15
0
10
20
15
3
0
Bike Min Green
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cond Sery Min Grn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Walk
0
11
7
7
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
Ped Clearance
0
35
18
17
0
0
0
38
0
0
0
0
Veh Extension
3.0
7.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
7.0
0.0
5.0
1.0
7.0
3.0
0.0
Alt Veh Exten
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max Extension
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max 1
20
50
55
25
25
50
0
55
15
40
16
0
Max 2
20
45
35
35
20
45
0
35
15
45
20
0
Max 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Det. Fail Max
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Yellow Change
3.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.0
3.0
Red Clearance
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Red Revert
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
Act. B4 Init
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sec/Actuation
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max Initial
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time B4 Reduction
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cars Waiting
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time To Reduce
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Minimum Gap
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 217 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
No -Serve Phases
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase Cannot Serve With Phase
Phase 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
1.
2. . .
3. . .
4. . .
5. . .
6. . .
7. . .
8.
9. . .
10. . .
11.
2
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 218 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Ped Carryover
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ped Start Phase Carry Over Phase
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
11 0
12 0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 219 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Vehicle/Ped Phase as Overlap
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ped Phase As Overlap
Ped Consists of Ped Phases
Ovlap
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 220 of
Veh Phase As Overlap
Veh
Consists of Veh Phases
Ovlap
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11 12
1
X
X
2
X
X
3
X
4
X
5
X
6
X
X
X
7
X
8
X
9
X
10
X
11
X
12
X
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 220 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Overlap Data
Overlap A Phase: 1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
X
X
X
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
X
X
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . .
. .
.
0.0
Green
Yellow
Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . .
. .
.
7.0
4.5
1.5
Overlap B Phase: 1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
X
X
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
X
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . .
. .
.
0.0
Green
Yellow
Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . .
. .
.
7.0
4.5
1.5
Overlap C Phase: 1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . .
. .
.
0.0
Green
Yellow
Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . .
. .
.
7.0
4.5
1.5
Overlap D Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . . X X
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 221 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Power Start, Remote Flash
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Power Start . . . . . X X .
External Start . . . X X .
Into Remote Flash. .
Exit Remote Flash. Overlap
Remote Flash Yellow. A B C D
Flash Together . . . .
Initialization Interval:
Power Start . . . . . . . . Yellow Overlap
External Start. . . . . . . Yellow Overlap
Power Start All Red Time. . 0
Power Start Flash Time. . . 0
Remote Flash Options:
Out of Flash Yellow . . . . NO
Out of Flash All Red. . . . NO
Minimum Recall. . . . . . . NO
Alternate Flash . . . . . . NO
Flash Thru Load Switches. . NO
Cycle Through Phases. . . . NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 222 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Option Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Guaranteed Passage .
Call To NonActuated 1
Call To NonActuated 2
Dual Entry. . . . . . .
Conditional Service . .
Conditional Reservice
Actuated Rest in Walk
Flashing Walk . . . . .
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X X .
X X X X .
Enable Programmable Options
Dual Entry. . . . . . . . . . .
ON
Backup Protection
Group
1 . .
. . OFF
Conditional Service . . . . . .
OFF
Backup Protection
Group
2 . .
. . OFF
Ped Clearance Protection. . . .
OFF
Backup Protection
Group
3 . .
. . OFF
Special Preempt Overlap Flash
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
1. . .
. . OFF
Cond Service Det Cross Switch
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
2. . .
. . OFF
Lock Detectors in Red Only. . .
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
3. . .
. . OFF
Five Section Left Turn Control
Phases: 5-2 7-4 1-6 3-8 11-10 9-12
Left Turn Head. . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 223 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Recall Data, Dimming
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Locking Detector. . . .
Vehicle Recall. . . . .
Pedestrian Recall . . .
Recall To Max . . . . .
Soft Recall . . . . . .
Don't Rest Here . . . .
Ped Dark if No Call . .
Dimming:
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X X X X X X X X
X X .
Load Switch
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Green/Walk. . . . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Yellow/Ped Clear. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Red/Don't Walk. . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 224 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Detector Type/Timers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Det 1: Detector 1
Det 2: Detector 2
Det 3: Detector 3
Det 4: Detector 4
Det 5: Detector 5
Det 6: Detector 6
Det 7: Detector 7
Det 8: Detector 8
Det 9: Detector 9
Det 10: Detector 10
Det 11: Detector 11
Det 12: Detector 12
Det 13: Detector 13
Det 14: Detector 14
Det 15: Detector 15
Det 16: Detector 16
Don't Reset
Extend Type
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
Detector Names
Det 17: Detector 17
Det 18: Detector 18
Det 19: Detector 19
Det 20: Detector 20
Det 21: Detector 21
Det 22: Detector 22
Det 23: Detector 23
Det 24: Detector 24
Det 25: Detector 25
Det 26: Detector 26
Det 27: Detector 27
Det 28: Detector 28
Det 29: Detector 29
Det 30: Detector 30
Det 31: Detector 31
Det 32: Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 225 of
Locking
Log
Timers
Det.
Memory
Enable
Extend
Delay
1
NO
NO
0.0
0
2
NO
NO
0.0
0
3
NO
NO
0.0
0
4
NO
NO
0.0
0
5
NO
NO
0.0
0
6
NO
NO
0.0
0
7
NO
NO
0.0
0
8
NO
NO
0.0
0
9
NO
NO
0.0
0
10
NO
NO
0.0
0
11
NO
NO
0.0
0
12
NO
NO
0.0
0
13
NO
NO
0.0
0
14
NO
NO
0.0
0
15
NO
NO
0.0
0
16
NO
NO
0.0
0
17
NO
NO
0.0
0
18
NO
NO
0.0
0
19
NO
NO
0.0
0
20
NO
NO
0.0
0
21
NO
NO
0.0
0
22
NO
NO
0.0
0
23
NO
NO
0.0
0
24
NO
NO
0.0
0
25
NO
NO
0.0
0
26
NO
NO
0.0
0
27
NO
NO
0.0
0
28
NO
NO
0.0
0
29
NO
NO
0.0
0
30
NO
NO
0.0
0
31
NO
NO
0.0
0
32
NO
NO
0.0
0
Det 1: Detector 1
Det 2: Detector 2
Det 3: Detector 3
Det 4: Detector 4
Det 5: Detector 5
Det 6: Detector 6
Det 7: Detector 7
Det 8: Detector 8
Det 9: Detector 9
Det 10: Detector 10
Det 11: Detector 11
Det 12: Detector 12
Det 13: Detector 13
Det 14: Detector 14
Det 15: Detector 15
Det 16: Detector 16
Don't Reset
Extend Type
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
Detector Names
Det 17: Detector 17
Det 18: Detector 18
Det 19: Detector 19
Det 20: Detector 20
Det 21: Detector 21
Det 22: Detector 22
Det 23: Detector 23
Det 24: Detector 24
Det 25: Detector 25
Det 26: Detector 26
Det 27: Detector 27
Det 28: Detector 28
Det 29: Detector 29
Det 30: Detector 30
Det 31: Detector 31
Det 32: Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 225 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Detector Type/Timers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
33
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
34
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
35
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
36
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
37
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
38
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
39
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
40
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
41
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
42
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
43
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
44
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
45
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
46
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
47
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
48
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
49
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
50
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
51
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
52
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
53
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
54
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
55
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
56
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
57
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
58
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
59
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
60
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
61
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
62
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
63
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
64
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
Detector Names
Det 33: Detector 33
Det 34: Detector 34
Det 35: Detector 35
Det 36: Detector 36
Det 37: Detector 37
Det 38: Detector 38
Det 39: Detector 39
Det 40: Detector 40
Det 41: Detector 41
Det 42: Detector 42
Det 43: Detector 43
Det 44: Detector 44
Det 45: Detector 45
Det 46: Detector 46
Det 47: Detector 47
Det 48: Detector 48
Det 49: Detector 49
Det 50: Detector 50
Det 51: Detector 51
Det 52: Detector 52
Det 53: Detector 53
Det 54: Detector 54
Det 55: Detector 55
Det 56: Detector 56
Det 57: Detector 57
Det 58: Detector 58
Det 59: Detector 59
Det 60: Detector 60
Det 61: Detector 61
Det 62: Detector 62
Det 63: Detector 63
Det 64: Detector 64
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 226 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Detector Phase Assignment
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 227 of
Phase
Det.
1 2 3 4
5 6 7
8
9 10 11 12
1
X
2
X
X
3
X
X
4
X
X
5
X
6
X
7
X
X
8
X
X
9
10
11
X
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
X
20
X
21
X
22
X
23
X
24
X
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 227 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Detector Cross Switching
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 228 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Detector Cross Switching
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 229 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Ped/SD Local Assign,Log Interval
Phase Ped Detector
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Is Ped Detector No. ... 1 2 8 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12
*Local System Detector No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Is Local Detector No. .. 3 4 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector Log Interval . . 15
*NOTE: System master designations cross referenced to local
system detector numbers are:
SDA1 = 1 & 9
SDA2 = 2 & 10
SDB1 = 3 & 11
SDB2 = 4 & 12
SDC1 = 5 & 13
SDC2 = 6 & 14
SDD1 = 7 & 15
SDD2 = 8 & 16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 230 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Diagnostic Plans/Fail Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 231 of
Detector
Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1 Diagnostic
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
1
1
15
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Detector
Plan
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1 Diagnostic
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
15
15
15
15
15
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 231 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Diagnostic Plans/Fail Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 232 of
Detector
Plan
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Detector
Plan
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 232 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Ped Diagnostic Plans
Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 233 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Detector Diagnostic Intervals
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic *No -Activity
*Max Presence
Number Diagnostic Interval
Diagnostic Interval
Erratic Counts
1 2
2
80
2 0
0
0
3 0
0
0
4 0
0
0
5 0
0
0
6 0
0
0
7 0
0
0
8 0
0
0
9 0
0
0
10 0
0
0
11 0
0
0
12 0
0
0
13 0
0
0
14 0
0
0
15 0
0
0
16 0
0
0
17 0
0
0
18 0
0
0
19 0
0
0
20 0
0
0
21 0
0
0
22 0
0
0
23 0
0
0
24 0
0
0
25 0
0
0
26 0
0
0
27 0
0
0
28 0
0
0
29 0
0
0
30 0
0
0
31 0
0
0
32 0
0
0
*NOTE: Scaling is specified in each detector diagnostic plan.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 234 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Speed Detectors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inches
NOTE: Speed Detector 1 = STA, Speed Detector 2 = STB
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 235 of
Local
Speed
Detector
One Detector Speed:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vehicle Length .......
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Loop Length. . . . . . . .
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Two Detector Speed:
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Speed Trap Length. .....
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Local
Speed
Detector
One Detector Speed:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vehicle Length .......
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Loop Length. . . . . . . .
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Two Detector Speed:
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Speed Trap Length. .....
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inches
NOTE: Speed Detector 1 = STA, Speed Detector 2 = STB
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 235 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Coordinator Manual Command and Options
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Manual Enable . . . .
.
Pattern . . . . . .
. 0
Split Units . . . . .
Seconds
OffsetUnits .
. . . .
Seconds
Interconnect Format .
STD
Interconnect
Source .
TLM
Transition. . . . . .
SMOOTH
Dwell Period.
. . . .
0
Resync Count. . . . .
3
Actuated Coord Phase
. . . X
Actuated Walk Rest
Inhibit Max Timing .
. . . X
Max 2 Select . . .
. . . .
Floating Force Off .
. . . X
Multisync. . . . .
. . . .
Phase
Split Demand: Call Time
Cyc Count
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Demand 1 0
0
.
Demand 2 0
0
. .
Auto Permissive Min Green .
Free Alternate Sequence . .
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A B C D E F
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 236 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Coordination Patterns
---------------------
Pattern 1
Cycle Length . . 160 COS . . . . . 111
Offset . . . . . 0
Vehicle Permissive . . [1] 0 [2] 0
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement 0 Phase Reservice. NO
Splits: Phase 1- 26 2- 44 3- 60 4- 30
Phase 5- 26 6- 44 7- 0 8- 60
Phase 9- 0 10- 0 11- 0 12- 0 Split Sum: 0
Split Extension/Ring [1] 0 [2] 0
Split Demand Pattern [1] 0 [2] 0
XRT Pattern. . . 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Pattern 2
Cycle Length 170 COS . . . . . 211
Offset . . . . . 0
Vehicle Permissive . . [1]
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement
Splits: Phase 1- 22 2 -
Phase 5- 22 6 -
Phase 9- 0 10 -
Split Extension/Ring [1]
Split Demand Pattern [1]
XRT Pattern. . . 0
0 [2] 0
0 Phase Reservice
42 3- 76 4- 30
42 7- 0 8- 76
0 11- 0 12- 0
0 [2] 0
0 [2] 0
NO
Split Sum: 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Pattern 3
Cycle Length 170 COS . . . . . 311
Offset . . . . . 0
Vehicle Permissive . . [1]
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement
Splits: Phase 1- 18 2 -
Phase 5- 28 6 -
Phase 9- 0 10 -
Split Extension/Ring [1]
Split Demand Pattern [1]
XRT Pattern. . . 0
0 [2] 0
0 Phase Reservice.
47 3- 75 4- 30
37 7- 0 8- 75
0 11- 0 12- 0
0 [2] 0
0 [2] 0
. NO
Split Sum: 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 237 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Preemptors
Preemptor 1
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Ped Dark . . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Ped Active
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Ped Clr Thru Yel X
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . . X
Delay Time . . . .
1
Hold Delay Time.
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
4.5 2.0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
4
0.0 0.0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
15
Hold Delay Time.
4
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 1
4.5 2.0
Track Clear . . . . 20
4.5 2.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . X .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 2
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
Exit Max . . . . .
Min Hold Time. . .
Hold Delay Time.
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 1
4.5 2.0
Track Clear . . . . 20
4.5 2.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Ped Dark . . . . . .
Ped Active
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Ped Clr Thru Yel X
0
1
0
4
0
0
15
4
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . X .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X
Exit Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 238 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Preemptors
Preemptor 3
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 4
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 239 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Preemptors
Preemptor 5
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 6
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 240 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Bus Preemptors
Preemptor 1 . . . . .
Preemptor 2 . . . . .
Preemptor 3 . . . . .
Preemptor 4 . . . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 241 of
Bus Preemptor
1
2 3
4
Preemptor Active. . . . .
. . .
Detector Lock . . . . . .
. . .
Maximum Time. . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Reservice Time. . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Delay Time . . . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Inhibit Time. . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Green. . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Ped Clearance. .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Yellow . . . . .
. . . 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Entrance Red. . . . . . .
. . . 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Minimum Hold Time . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Hold Phases
1
2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Preemptor 1 . . . . .
Preemptor 2 . . . . .
Preemptor 3 . . . . .
Preemptor 4 . . . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 241 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
NIC/TOD Clock/Calendar
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Manual NIC Program Step . . . . . . . . 0
Manual TOD Program Step . . . . . . . . 0
NIC Resync Time . . . . . . . . . . . . 0315
Sync Reference is . . . . . . . . . . . Reference Time
Week 1 Begins on 1st Sunday . . . . . . NO If NO, then week containing Jan. 1
Disable Daylight Savings Time . . . . . NO
Daylight Savings
Begins Last Sunday in March . . . . . . NO If NO, then Second Sunday as per 2007 DST Law
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 242 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
TOD Weekly/Yearly
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Weekly Program Numbers
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 243 of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sunday ...
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Monday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Tuesday. ..
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Wednesday.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Thursday .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Friday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Saturday
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Week
of
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16 17
18
Prog 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 34 35
36
P r o g 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51 52 53
P r o g 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 243 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
Holiday Programs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Holiday
Type
Month
Day of Week/
Week of Year/
Program
Day of Month
Year
1
Fixed
0
0
0
0
2
Fixed
0
0
0
0
3
Fixed
0
0
0
0
4
Fixed
0
0
0
0
5
Fixed
0
0
0
0
6
Fixed
0
0
0
0
7
Fixed
0
0
0
0
8
Fixed
0
0
0
0
9
Fixed
0
0
0
0
10
Fixed
0
0
0
0
11
Fixed
0
0
0
0
12
Fixed
0
0
0
0
13
Fixed
0
0
0
0
14
Fixed
0
0
0
0
15
Fixed
0
0
0
0
16
Fixed
0
0
0
0
17
Fixed
0
0
0
0
18
Fixed
0
0
0
0
19
Fixed
0
0
0
0
20
Fixed
0
0
0
0
21
Fixed
0
0
0
0
22
Fixed
0
0
0
0
23
Fixed
0
0
0
0
24
Fixed
0
0
0
0
25
Fixed
0
0
0
0
26
Fixed
0
0
0
0
27
Fixed
0
0
0
0
28
Fixed
0
0
0
0
29
Fixed
0
0
0
0
30
Fixed
0
0
0
0
31
Fixed
0
0
0
0
32
Fixed
0
0
0
0
33
Fixed
0
0
0
0
34
Fixed
0
0
0
0
35
Fixed
0
0
0
0
36
Fixed
0
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 244 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
NIC Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step
Program
Step Begins
Pattern
Override
1
1
0600
2
NO
2
1
0900
1
NO
3
1
1500
3
NO
4
1
1900
1
NO
5
1
2300
0
NO
6
2
0700
1
NO
7
2
2300
0
NO
8
3
0900
1
NO
9
3
2100
0
NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 245 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 1 Program 1
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0600
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 2 Program 1
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1900
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 246 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 3 Program 2
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0700
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 4 Program 2
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1800
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 247 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:24
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 5 Program 3
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0900
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 6 Program 3
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1700
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 248 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Configuration
Overlap
A B C D
Direction . . .
Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only):
Load
Signal
Switch
Controller
Sequence
Priority
Phase/
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8 9
10
Ring 1 Phases
1
2
0
4
X11 1
3 112
1 9 110
1 0
Ring 2 Phases
5
6
7
8
0
0 1 0
0 0
0
9 . . . . .
. 2
X
10 . . . . .
. 4
Phase
11 . . . . .
. 6
X
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8 9
10
In Use . . . . .
. X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
Exclusive Ped
Direction . . .
.
Overlap
A B C D
Direction . . .
Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only):
Load
Signal
Switch
Driver
Group
(MMU)
Phase/
Channel
Ovlap
Ped
1 . . . .
1
2 . . . . .
. 2
3 . . . . .
. 3
4 . . . . .
. 4
5 . . . . .
. 5
6 . . . . .
. 6
7 . . . . .
. 7
8 . . . .
8
9 . . . . .
. 2
X
10 . . . . .
. 4
X
11 . . . . .
. 6
X
12 . . . . .
. 8
X
13 . . . . .
. A
14 . . . . .
. B
15 . . . . .
. C
16 . . . . .
. D
11
0
0
12
0
0
11 12
X X
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 249 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Configuration Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Enable BIU: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Terminal/Facilities. . . . . .
Detector Rack.
Type 2 Runs as Type 1. . . .
MMU Disable. . . . . . . . X
Diagnostic Enable. . . . . .
Peer -Peer Comm Enable. . . .
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Peer To Peer Addresses 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255
Port 2:
Port 2
Protocol . . . . . .
. . Terminal
Port 2
Enable . . . . . . .
. . YES
AB3418
Address. . . . . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Group Address. . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Response Delay . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Single Flag Enable .
. . NO
AB3418
Drop -Out Time. . . .
. . 0
AB3418
TOD SF Select. . . .
. . 0
Data Rate
. . . . . . . . .
. . 1200 bps
Data,
Parity, Stop. . . . .
. . 8, 0, 1
Port 3:
Port 3 Protocol . . . . . . .
. Telemetry
Port 3 Enable . . . . . . . .
. YES
Telemetry Address. . . . . .
. 2
System Detector 9-16 Address.
. 0
Telemetry Response Delay. . .
. 2000
AB3418 Address. . . . . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Group Address. . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Response Delay . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Single Flag Enable . .
. NO
AB3418 Drop -Out Time. . . . .
. 0
AB3418 TOD SF Select. . . . .
. 0
Duplex . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Full
Data Rate . . . . . . . . . .
. 9600 bps
Data, Parity, Stop. . . . . .
. 8, 0, 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 250 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Configuration Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Event Enabling
Critical RFE'S (MMU/TF) . . . . .
Non -Critical RFE'S (DET/TEST) . .
Detector Errors . . . . . . . . .
Coordination Errors . . . . . . .
MMU Flash Faults. . . . . . . . .
Local Flash Faults. . . . . . . .
Preempt . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Power On/Off . . . . . . . . . . .
Low Battery . . . . . . . . . . .
Supervisor Access Code. . . ****
Data Change Access Code ****
Alarm Enabling
X ALARM
1 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
2 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
3 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
4 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
5 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
6 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
7 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
8 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
9 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
10 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
11 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
12 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
13 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
14 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
15 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
16 . . . . . . . . . . .
MMU Compatibility Program (Info Only)
Channel
Version Info:
Software Assy.
Boot
Program
Application
Help
Configuration
Is
Allowed to
Time
With
Channel
16 15 14 13
. . . .
. . . .
12 11 10
. . .
. . .
9 8
. .
. .
7
.
.
6 5 4 3 2
. . . . .
. . . .
Part No.
27831
45591
27891
27919
Version
2.83
1.9
. 3
6.33
C912❑
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 251 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
By -Phase Timing Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Direction
Minimum Green
3
15
5
15
3
15
3
15
17
3
1
8
Bike Min Green
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cond Sery Min Grn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Walk
0
7
0
7
0
7
0
7
0
0
0
7
Ped Clearance
0
26
0
27
0
20
0
22
0
0
0
22
Veh Extension
3.0
7.0
3.0
7.0
3.0
7.0
3.0
7.0
4.0
4.0
0.0
4.0
Alt Veh Exten
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max Extension
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max 1
15
40
20
35
15
40
12
35
10
10
1
18
Max 2
15
40
15
35
15
40
12
35
10
10
1
18
Max 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Det. Fail Max
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Yellow Change
3.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Red Clearance
0.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
0.0
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Red Revert
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Act. B4 Init
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sec/Actuation
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max Initial
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time B4 Reduction
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
8
Cars Waiting
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time To Reduce
0
0
0
10
0
10
0
10
0
0
0
5
Minimum Gap
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 252 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
No—Serve Phases
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase Cannot Serve With Phase
Phase 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
1.
2. . .
3. . .
4. . .
5. . .
6. . .
7. . .
8.
9. . .
10. . .
11.
2
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 253 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Ped Carryover
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ped Start Phase Carry Over Phase
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
11 0
12 0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 254 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Vehicle/Ped Phase as Overlap
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ped Phase As Overlap
Ped Consists of Ped Phases
Ovlap
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Veh Phase As Overlap
Veh Consists of Veh Phases
Ovlap
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 X
2 X X
3 X
4 X
5 X
6 X X
7 X
8 X
9 X X X
10 X X
11 X X X X X X X
12
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 255 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Overlap Data
Overlap A Phase:
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
11
12
Standard. .......
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. ......
X
X
X
X
X X
X
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . .
. .
. .
.
0.0
Green
Yellow
Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . .
. .
. .
.
7.0
4.5
1.5
Overlap B Phase:
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
11
12
Standard. . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . .
. .
. .
.
0.0
Green
Yellow
Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . .
. .
. .
.
7.0
4.5
1.5
Overlap C Phase:
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
11
12
Standard. .......
X
X
X
X X
X
X
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . .
. .
. .
.
0.0
Green
Yellow
Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . .
. .
. .
.
7.0
4.5
1.5
Overlap D Phase:
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
10
11
12
Standard. . . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
X
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
X
X
X
X
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . .
. .
. .
.
0.0
Green
Yellow
Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . .
. .
. .
.
7.0
4.5
1.5
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 256 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Power Start, Remote Flash
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Power Start . . . . . X X .
External Start . . . X X .
Into Remote Flash. X .
Exit Remote Flash. Overlap
Remote Flash Yellow. A B C D
Flash Together . . . .
Initialization Interval:
Power Start . . . . . . . . Yellow Overlap
External Start. . . . . . . Yellow Overlap
Power Start All Red Time. . 0
Power Start Flash Time. . . 0
Remote Flash Options:
Out of Flash Yellow . . . . NO
Out of Flash All Red. . . . NO
Minimum Recall. . . . . . . NO
Alternate Flash . . . . . . NO
Flash Thru Load Switches. . NO
Cycle Through Phases. . . . NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 257 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Option Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Guaranteed Passage .
Call To NonActuated 1
Call To NonActuated 2
Dual Entry. . . . . . .
Conditional Service . .
Conditional Reservice
Actuated Rest in Walk
Flashing Walk . . . . .
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X X .
X X X X .
Enable Programmable Options
Dual Entry. . . . . . . . . .
. ON
Backup Protection
Group
1 . .
. . ON
Conditional Service . . . . .
. OFF
Backup Protection
Group
2 . .
. . ON
Ped Clearance Protection. . .
. OFF
Backup Protection
Group
3 . .
. . OFF
Special Preempt Overlap Flash
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
1. . .
. . ON
Cond Service Det Cross Switch
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
2. . .
. . ON
Lock Detectors in Red Only. .
. OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
3. . .
. . OFF
Five
Section
Left Turn Control
Phases: 5-2 7-4
1-6
3-8 11-10
9-12
Left Turn Head. . . . X
X
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 258 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Recall Data, Dimming
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Locking Detector. . . .
Vehicle Recall. . . . .
Pedestrian Recall . . .
Recall To Max . . . . .
Soft Recall . . . . . .
Don't Rest Here . . . .
Ped Dark if No Call . .
Dimming:
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X X X X X X .
X X .
Load Switch
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Green/Walk. . . . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Yellow/Ped Clear. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Red/Don't Walk. . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 259 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Type/Timers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Detector Names
Det 1: Detector 1
Det 2: Detector 2
Det 3: Detector 3
Det 4: Detector 4
Det 5: Detector 5
Det 6: Detector 6
Det 7: Detector 7
Det 8: Detector 8
Det 9: Detector 9
Det 10: Detector 10
Det 11: Detector 11
Det 12: Detector 12
Det 13: Detector 13
Det 14: Detector 14
Det 15: Detector 15
Det 16: Detector 16
Det 17: Detector 17
Det 18: Detector 18
Det 19: Detector 19
Det 20: Detector 20
Det 21: Detector 21
Det 22: Detector 22
Det 23: Detector 23
Det 24: Detector 24
Det 25: Detector 25
Det 26: Detector 26
Det 27: Detector 27
Det 28: Detector 28
Det 29: Detector 29
Det 30: Detector 30
Det 31: Detector 31
Det 32: Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 260 of
Locking
Log
Timers
Don't Reset
Det.
Memory
Enable
Extend
Delay
Extend
Type
1
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
2
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
3
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
4
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
5
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
6
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
7
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
8
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
9
NO
NO
0.0
0
6
- Calling
10
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
11
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
12
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
13
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
14
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
15
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
16
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
17
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
18
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
19
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
20
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
21
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
22
NO
NO
0.0
0
6
- Calling
23
NO
NO
0.0
0
6
- Calling
24
NO
NO
0.0
0
6
- Calling
25
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
26
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
27
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
28
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
29
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
30
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
31
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
32
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
Detector Names
Det 1: Detector 1
Det 2: Detector 2
Det 3: Detector 3
Det 4: Detector 4
Det 5: Detector 5
Det 6: Detector 6
Det 7: Detector 7
Det 8: Detector 8
Det 9: Detector 9
Det 10: Detector 10
Det 11: Detector 11
Det 12: Detector 12
Det 13: Detector 13
Det 14: Detector 14
Det 15: Detector 15
Det 16: Detector 16
Det 17: Detector 17
Det 18: Detector 18
Det 19: Detector 19
Det 20: Detector 20
Det 21: Detector 21
Det 22: Detector 22
Det 23: Detector 23
Det 24: Detector 24
Det 25: Detector 25
Det 26: Detector 26
Det 27: Detector 27
Det 28: Detector 28
Det 29: Detector 29
Det 30: Detector 30
Det 31: Detector 31
Det 32: Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 260 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Type/Timers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
33
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
34
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
35
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
36
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
37
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
38
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
39
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
40
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
41
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
42
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
43
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
44
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
45
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
46
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
47
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
48
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
49
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
50
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
51
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
52
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
53
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
54
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
55
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
56
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
57
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
58
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
59
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
60
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
61
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
62
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
63
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
64
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
Detector Names
Det 33: Detector 33
Det 34: Detector 34
Det 35: Detector 35
Det 36: Detector 36
Det 37: Detector 37
Det 38: Detector 38
Det 39: Detector 39
Det 40: Detector 40
Det 41: Detector 41
Det 42: Detector 42
Det 43: Detector 43
Det 44: Detector 44
Det 45: Detector 45
Det 46: Detector 46
Det 47: Detector 47
Det 48: Detector 48
Det 49: Detector 49
Det 50: Detector 50
Det 51: Detector 51
Det 52: Detector 52
Det 53: Detector 53
Det 54: Detector 54
Det 55: Detector 55
Det 56: Detector 56
Det 57: Detector 57
Det 58: Detector 58
Det 59: Detector 59
Det 60: Detector 60
Det 61: Detector 61
Det 62: Detector 62
Det 63: Detector 63
Det 64: Detector 64
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 261 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Phase Assignment
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 262 of
Phase
Det.
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
9 10 11 12
1
X
2
X
3
X
X
4
5
X
6
X
7
X
8
X
9
X
10
X
11
X
12
X
13
X
14
X
15
X
X
X
16
X
17
X
18
X
19
X
20
X
21
X
22
X
23
X
24
X
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 262 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Cross Switching
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 263 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Cross Switching
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 264 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Ped/SD Local Assign,Log Interval
Phase Ped Detector
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Is Ped Detector No. ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 7
*Local System Detector No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Is Local Detector No. .. 1 2 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector Log Interval . . 0
*NOTE: System master designations cross referenced to local
system detector numbers are:
SDA1 = 1 & 9
SDA2 = 2 & 10
SDB1 = 3 & 11
SDB2 = 4 & 12
SDC1 = 5 & 13
SDC2 = 6 & 14
SDD1 = 7 & 15
SDD2 = 8 & 16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 265 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Diagnostic Plans/Fail Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 266 of
Detector
Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1 Diagnostic
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
Scaling
15
15
15
1
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Detector
Plan
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1 Diagnostic
1
2
1
2
1
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 266 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Diagnostic Plans/Fail Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 267 of
Detector
Plan
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Detector
Plan
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 267 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Ped Diagnostic Plans
Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 268 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Diagnostic Intervals
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic *No -Activity
*Max Presence
Number Diagnostic Interval
Diagnostic Interval
Erratic Counts
1 2
2
80
2 8
4
80
3 4
12
80
4 0
0
0
5 0
0
0
6 0
0
0
7 0
0
0
8 0
0
0
9 0
0
0
10 0
0
0
11 0
0
0
12 0
0
0
13 0
0
0
14 0
0
0
15 0
0
0
16 0
0
0
17 0
0
0
18 0
0
0
19 0
0
0
20 0
0
0
21 0
0
0
22 0
0
0
23 0
0
0
24 0
0
0
25 0
0
0
26 0
0
0
27 0
0
0
28 0
0
0
29 0
0
0
30 0
0
0
31 0
0
0
32 0
0
0
*NOTE: Scaling is specified in each detector diagnostic plan.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 269 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Speed Detectors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inches
NOTE: Speed Detector 1 = STA, Speed Detector 2 = STB
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 270 of
Local
Speed
Detector
One Detector Speed:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vehicle Length .......
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Loop Length. . . . . . . .
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Two Detector Speed:
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Speed Trap Length. .....
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Local
Speed
Detector
One Detector Speed:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vehicle Length .......
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Loop Length. . . . . . . .
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Two Detector Speed:
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Speed Trap Length. .....
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inches
NOTE: Speed Detector 1 = STA, Speed Detector 2 = STB
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 270 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Coordinator Manual Command and Options
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Manual Enable . . . .
.
Pattern . . . . . .
. 0
Split Units . . . . .
Seconds
OffsetUnits .
. . . .
Seconds
Interconnect Format .
STD
Interconnect
Source .
TLM
Transition. . . . . .
SMOOTH
Dwell Period.
. . . .
0
Resync Count. . . . .
3
Actuated Coord Phase
. . . X
Actuated Walk Rest
Inhibit Max Timing .
. . . X
Max 2 Select . . .
. . . .
Floating Force Off
Multisync. . . . .
. . . .
Phase
Split Demand: Call Time
Cyc Count
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Demand 1 0
0
.
Demand 2 0
0
. .
Auto Permissive Min Green .
Free Alternate Sequence . .
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A B C D E F
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 271 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Coordination Patterns
---------------------
Pattern 1
Cycle Length . . 160 COS . . . . . 111
Offset . . . . . 65
Vehicle Permissive . . [1] 0 [2] 0
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement 0 Phase Reservice. NO
Splits: Phase 1- 26 2- 30 3- 14 4- 49
Phase 5- 26 6- 30 7- 15 8- 36
Phase 9- 0 10- 0 11- 14 12- 27 Split Sum: 0
Split Extension/Ring [1] 0 [2] 0
Split Demand Pattern [1] 0 [2] 0
XRT Pattern. . . 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Pattern 2
Cycle Length 170 COS . . . . . 211
Offset . . . . . 50
Vehicle Permissive . . [1]
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement
Splits: Phase 1- 15 2 -
Phase 5- 15 6 -
Phase 9- 0 10 -
Split Extension/Ring [1]
Split Demand Pattern [1]
XRT Pattern. . . 0
0
[2]
0
0
Phase
Reservice
35
3- 13
4- 55
35
7- 17
8- 38
0
11- 14
12- 38
0
[2]
0
0
[2]
0
NO
Split Sum: 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Pattern 3
Cycle Length 170 COS . . . . . 311
Offset . . . . . 63
Vehicle Permissive . . [1]
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement
Splits: Phase 1- 24 2 -
Phase 5- 24 6 -
Phase 9- 0 10 -
Split Extension/Ring [1]
Split Demand Pattern [1]
XRT Pattern. . . 0
0 [2] 0
0 Phase Reservice.
35 3- 16 4- 54
35 7- 16 8- 38
0 11- 14 12- 27
0 [2] 0
0 [2] 0
. NO
Split Sum: 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 272 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Preemptors
Preemptor 1
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Ped Dark . . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Ped Active
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Ped Clr Thru Yel X
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . . X
Delay Time . . . .
1
Hold Delay Time.
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
4.5 1.5
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
4
0.0 0.0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
15
Hold Delay Time.
4
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 1
4.5 1.5
Track Clear . . . . 17
4.5 1.5
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . X .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 2
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
Exit Max . . . . .
Min Hold Time. . .
Hold Delay Time.
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 1
4.5 1.5
Track Clear . . . . 17
4.5 1.5
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Ped Dark . . . . . .
Ped Active
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Ped Clr Thru Yel X
0
1
0
4
0
0
15
4
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . X .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X
Exit Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 273 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Preemptors
Preemptor 3
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 4
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 274 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Preemptors
Preemptor 5
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
Hold Delay Time.
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
0.0 0.0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
0.0 0.0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . X
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 6
Active . . . . . . . . . . .
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
Exit Max . . . . .
Min Hold Time. . .
Hold Delay Time.
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Ped Dark . . . . .
Ped Active . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 275 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Bus Preemptors
Preemptor 1 . . . . .
Preemptor 2 . . . . .
Preemptor 3 . . . . .
Preemptor 4 . . . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 276 of
Bus Preemptor
1
2 3
4
Preemptor Active. . . . .
. . .
Detector Lock . . . . . .
. . .
Maximum Time. . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Reservice Time. . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Delay Time . . . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Inhibit Time. . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Green. . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Ped Clearance. .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Yellow . . . . .
. . . 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Entrance Red. . . . . . .
. . . 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Minimum Hold Time . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Hold Phases
1
2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Preemptor 1 . . . . .
Preemptor 2 . . . . .
Preemptor 3 . . . . .
Preemptor 4 . . . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 276 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
NIC/TOD Clock/Calendar
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Manual NIC Program Step . . . . . . . . 0
Manual TOD Program Step . . . . . . . . 0
NIC Resync Time . . . . . . . . . . . . 0315
Sync Reference is . . . . . . . . . . . Reference Time
Week 1 Begins on 1st Sunday . . . . . . NO If NO, then week containing Jan. 1
Disable Daylight Savings Time . . . . . NO
Daylight Savings
Begins Last Sunday in March . . . . . . NO If NO, then Second Sunday as per 2007 DST Law
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 277 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
TOD Weekly/Yearly
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Weekly Program Numbers
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 278 of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sunday ...
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Monday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Tuesday. ..
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Wednesday.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Thursday .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Friday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Saturday
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Week
of
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16 17
18
Prog 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 34 35
36
P r o g 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51 52 53
P r o g 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 278 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
Holiday Programs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Holiday
Type
Month
Day of Week/
Week of Year/
Program
Day of Month
Year
1
Fixed
0
0
0
0
2
Fixed
0
0
0
0
3
Fixed
0
0
0
0
4
Fixed
0
0
0
0
5
Fixed
0
0
0
0
6
Fixed
0
0
0
0
7
Fixed
0
0
0
0
8
Fixed
0
0
0
0
9
Fixed
0
0
0
0
10
Fixed
0
0
0
0
11
Fixed
0
0
0
0
12
Fixed
0
0
0
0
13
Fixed
0
0
0
0
14
Fixed
0
0
0
0
15
Fixed
0
0
0
0
16
Fixed
0
0
0
0
17
Fixed
0
0
0
0
18
Fixed
0
0
0
0
19
Fixed
0
0
0
0
20
Fixed
0
0
0
0
21
Fixed
0
0
0
0
22
Fixed
0
0
0
0
23
Fixed
0
0
0
0
24
Fixed
0
0
0
0
25
Fixed
0
0
0
0
26
Fixed
0
0
0
0
27
Fixed
0
0
0
0
28
Fixed
0
0
0
0
29
Fixed
0
0
0
0
30
Fixed
0
0
0
0
31
Fixed
0
0
0
0
32
Fixed
0
0
0
0
33
Fixed
0
0
0
0
34
Fixed
0
0
0
0
35
Fixed
0
0
0
0
36
Fixed
0
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 279 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
NIC Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step
Program
Step Begins
Pattern
Override
1
1
0600
2
NO
2
1
0900
1
NO
3
1
1500
3
NO
4
1
1900
1
NO
5
1
2300
0
NO
6
2
0700
1
NO
7
2
2300
0
NO
8
3
0900
1
NO
9
3
2100
0
NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 280 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 1 Program 1
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0600
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 2 Program 1
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1900
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 281 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 3 Program 2
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0700
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 4 Program 2
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1800
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 282 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & IL 83 (MAIN ST.)/PROSPECT 6/30/2016 16:25
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 5 Program 3
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0900
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 6 Program 3
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1700
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 283 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Configuration
Overlap
A B C D
Direction . . .
Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only):
Load
Signal
Switch
Controller
Sequence
Priority
Phase/
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8 9
10
Ring 1 Phases
1
2
3
4
9
10 0
0 0
0
Ring 2 Phases
5
6
7
8
X11
12 1 0
0 0
0
9 . . . . .
. 2
X
10 . . . . .
. 4
Phase
11 . . . . .
. 6
X
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8 9
10
In Use . . . . .
. X
X
X
X
X
X X
Exclusive Ped
Direction . . .
.
Overlap
A B C D
Direction . . .
Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only):
Load
Signal
Switch
Driver
Group
(MMU)
Phase/
Channel
Ovlap
Ped
1 . . . .
1
2 . . . . .
. 2
3 . . . . .
. 3
4 . . . . .
. 4
5 . . . . .
. 5
6 . . . . .
. 6
7 . . . . .
. 7
8 . . . .
8
9 . . . . .
. 2
X
10 . . . . .
. 4
X
11 . . . . .
. 6
X
12 . . . . .
. 8
X
13 . . . . .
. A
14 . . . . .
. B
15 . . . . .
. C
16 . . . . .
. D
11 12
0 0
0 0
11 12
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 284 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Configuration Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Enable BIU: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Terminal/Facilities. . . . X X .
Detector Rack. . . . . . . X .
Type 2 Runs as Type 1. . . X
MMU Disable. . . . . . . . .
Diagnostic Enable. . . . . .
Peer -Peer Comm Enable. . . .
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Peer To Peer Addresses 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255
Port 2:
Port 2
Protocol . . . . . .
. . Terminal
Port 2
Enable . . . . . . .
. . YES
AB3418
Address. . . . . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Group Address. . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Response Delay . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Single Flag Enable .
. . NO
AB3418
Drop -Out Time. . . .
. . 0
AB3418
TOD SF Select. . . .
. . 0
Data Rate
. . . . . . . . .
. . 1200 bps
Data,
Parity, Stop. . . . .
. . 8, 0, 1
Port 3:
Port 3 Protocol . . . . . . .
. Telemetry
Port 3 Enable . . . . . . . .
. YES
Telemetry Address. . . . . .
. 3
System Detector 9-16 Address.
. 0
Telemetry Response Delay. . .
. 2000
AB3418 Address. . . . . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Group Address. . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Response Delay . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Single Flag Enable . .
. NO
AB3418 Drop -Out Time. . . . .
. 0
AB3418 TOD SF Select. . . . .
. 0
Duplex . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Full
Data Rate . . . . . . . . . .
. 9600 bps
Data, Parity, Stop. . . . . .
. 8, 0, 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 285 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Configuration Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Event Enabling
Critical RFE'S (MMU/TF) . . . . .
Non -Critical RFE'S (DET/TEST) . .
Detector Errors . . . . . . . . .
Coordination Errors . . . . . . .
MMU Flash Faults. . . . . . . . .
Local Flash Faults. . . . . . . .
Preempt . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Power On/Off . . . . . . . . . . .
Low Battery . . . . . . . . . . .
Supervisor Access Code. . . ****
Data Change Access Code ****
Alarm Enabling
X ALARM
1 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
2 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
3 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
4 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
5 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
6 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
7 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
8 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
9 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
10 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
11 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
12 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
13 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
14 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
15 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
16 . . . . . . . . . . .
MMU Compatibility Program (Info Only)
Channel
Version Info:
Software Assy.
Boot
Program
Application
Help
Configuration
Is
Allowed to
Time
With
Channel
16 15 14 13
. . . .
. . . .
12 11 10
. . .
. . .
9 8
. .
. .
7
.
.
6 5 4 3 2
. . . . .
. . . .
Part No.
27831
45591
27891
27919
Version
2.83
1.9
. 3
6.33
C722❑
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 286 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 287 of
Phase
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Direction
Minimum Green
3
15
0
8
3
15
0
8
22
0
0
0
Bike Min Green
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cond Sery Min Grn
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Walk
0
8
0
9
0
8
0
7
0
0
0
0
Ped Clearance
0
14
0
21
0
17
0
21
0
0
0
0
Veh Extension
3.0
7.0
0.0
5.0
3.0
7.0
0.0
5.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Alt Veh Exten
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max Extension
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max 1
15
45
0
25
15
45
0
25
15
0
0
0
Max 2
15
45
0
25
15
45
0
25
15
0
0
0
Max 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Det. Fail Max
9
30
0
20
9
30
0
20
0
0
0
0
Yellow Change
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
3.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
Red Clearance
0.0
1.5
0.0
1.5
0.0
1.5
0.0
1.5
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
Red Revert
2.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Act. B4 Init
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sec/Actuation
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max Initial
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time B4 Reduction
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cars Waiting
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time To Reduce
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Minimum Gap
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 287 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
No -Serve Phases
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase Cannot Serve With Phase
Phase 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
1.
2. . .
3. . .
4. . .
5. . .
6. . .
7. . .
8.
9. . .
10. . .
11.
2
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 288 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Ped Carryover
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ped Start Phase Carry Over Phase
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
11 0
12 0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 289 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Vehicle/Ped Phase as Overlap
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ped Phase As Overlap
Ped Consists of Ped Phases
Ovlap
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Veh Phase As Overlap
Veh Consists of Veh Phases
Ovlap
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 X
2 X
3 X
4 X
5 X
6 X
7 X
8 X X
9
10
11
12
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 290 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Overlap Data
Overlap A Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Overlap B Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Overlap C Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Overlap D Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 291 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Power Start, Remote Flash
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Power Start . . . . . X X .
External Start . . . X X .
Into Remote Flash. X .
Exit Remote Flash. Overlap
Remote Flash Yellow. A B C D
Flash Together . . . .
Initialization Interval:
Power Start . . . . . . . . Yellow
External Start. . . . . . . Yellow
Power Start All Red Time. . 0
Power Start Flash Time. . . 0
Remote Flash Options:
Out of Flash Yellow . . . . NO
Out of Flash All Red. . . . NO
Minimum Recall. . . . . . . NO
Alternate Flash . . . . . . NO
Flash Thru Load Switches. . NO
Cycle Through Phases. . . . NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 292 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Option Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Guaranteed Passage .
Call To NonActuated 1
Call To NonActuated 2
Dual Entry. . . . . . .
Conditional Service . .
Conditional Reservice
Actuated Rest in Walk
Flashing Walk . . . . .
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X X .
X X X X .
Enable Programmable Options
Dual Entry. . . . . . . . . .
. ON
Backup Protection
Group
1 . .
. . ON
Conditional Service . . . . .
. OFF
Backup Protection
Group
2 . .
. . OFF
Ped Clearance Protection. . .
. OFF
Backup Protection
Group
3 . .
. . OFF
Special Preempt Overlap Flash
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
1. . .
. . ON
Cond Service Det Cross Switch
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
2. . .
. . ON
Lock Detectors in Red Only. .
. OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
3. . .
. . OFF
Five
Section
Left Turn Control
Phases: 5-2 7-4
1-6
3-8 11-10
9-12
Left Turn Head. . . . X
X
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 293 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Recall Data, Dimming
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Locking Detector. . . .
Vehicle Recall. . . . .
Pedestrian Recall . . .
Recall To Max . . . . .
Soft Recall . . . . . .
Don't Rest Here . . . .
Ped Dark if No Call . .
Dimming:
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X X .
X X .
Load Switch
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Green/Walk. . . . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Yellow/Ped Clear. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Red/Don't Walk. . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 294 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Type/Timers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Det 1: Detector 1
Det 2: Detector 2
Det 3: Detector 3
Det 4: Detector 4
Det 5: Detector 5
Det 6: Detector 6
Det 7: Detector 7
Det 8: Detector 8
Det 9: Detector 9
Det 10: Detector 10
Det 11: Detector 11
Det 12: Detector 12
Det 13: Detector 13
Det 14: Detector 14
Det 15: Detector 15
Det 16: Detector 16
Don't Reset
Extend Type
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
Detector Names
Det 17: Detector 17
Det 18: Detector 18
Det 19: Detector 19
Det 20: Detector 20
Det 21: Detector 21
Det 22: Detector 22
Det 23: Detector 23
Det 24: Detector 24
Det 25: Detector 25
Det 26: Detector 26
Det 27: Detector 27
Det 28: Detector 28
Det 29: Detector 29
Det 30: Detector 30
Det 31: Detector 31
Det 32: Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 295 of
Locking
Log
Timers
Det.
Memory
Enable
Extend
Delay
1
NO
NO
0.0
0
2
NO
NO
0.0
0
3
NO
NO
0.0
0
4
NO
NO
0.0
0
5
NO
NO
0.0
0
6
NO
NO
0.0
0
7
NO
NO
0.0
0
8
NO
NO
0.0
0
9
NO
NO
0.0
0
10
NO
NO
0.0
0
11
NO
NO
0.0
0
12
NO
NO
0.0
0
13
NO
NO
0.0
0
14
NO
NO
0.0
0
15
NO
NO
0.0
0
16
NO
NO
0.0
0
17
NO
NO
0.0
0
18
NO
NO
0.0
0
19
NO
NO
0.0
0
20
NO
NO
0.0
0
21
NO
NO
0.0
0
22
NO
NO
0.0
0
23
NO
NO
0.0
0
24
NO
NO
0.0
0
25
NO
NO
0.0
0
26
NO
NO
0.0
0
27
NO
NO
0.0
0
28
NO
NO
0.0
0
29
NO
NO
0.0
0
30
NO
NO
0.0
0
31
NO
NO
0.0
0
32
NO
NO
0.0
0
Det 1: Detector 1
Det 2: Detector 2
Det 3: Detector 3
Det 4: Detector 4
Det 5: Detector 5
Det 6: Detector 6
Det 7: Detector 7
Det 8: Detector 8
Det 9: Detector 9
Det 10: Detector 10
Det 11: Detector 11
Det 12: Detector 12
Det 13: Detector 13
Det 14: Detector 14
Det 15: Detector 15
Det 16: Detector 16
Don't Reset
Extend Type
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
Detector Names
Det 17: Detector 17
Det 18: Detector 18
Det 19: Detector 19
Det 20: Detector 20
Det 21: Detector 21
Det 22: Detector 22
Det 23: Detector 23
Det 24: Detector 24
Det 25: Detector 25
Det 26: Detector 26
Det 27: Detector 27
Det 28: Detector 28
Det 29: Detector 29
Det 30: Detector 30
Det 31: Detector 31
Det 32: Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 295 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Type/Timers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
33
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
34
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
35
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
36
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
37
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
38
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
39
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
40
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
41
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
42
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
43
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
44
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
45
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
46
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
47
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
48
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
49
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
50
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
51
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
52
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
53
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
54
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
55
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
56
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
57
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
58
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
59
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
60
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
61
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
62
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
63
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
64
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
Detector Names
Det 33: Detector 33
Det 34: Detector 34
Det 35: Detector 35
Det 36: Detector 36
Det 37: Detector 37
Det 38: Detector 38
Det 39: Detector 39
Det 40: Detector 40
Det 41: Detector 41
Det 42: Detector 42
Det 43: Detector 43
Det 44: Detector 44
Det 45: Detector 45
Det 46: Detector 46
Det 47: Detector 47
Det 48: Detector 48
Det 49: Detector 49
Det 50: Detector 50
Det 51: Detector 51
Det 52: Detector 52
Det 53: Detector 53
Det 54: Detector 54
Det 55: Detector 55
Det 56: Detector 56
Det 57: Detector 57
Det 58: Detector 58
Det 59: Detector 59
Det 60: Detector 60
Det 61: Detector 61
Det 62: Detector 62
Det 63: Detector 63
Det 64: Detector 64
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 296 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Phase Assignment
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 X
2 X
3 X
4 X
5 X
6
7 X
8 X
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 297 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Cross Switching
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 298 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Cross Switching
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 299 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Ped/SD Local Assign,Log Interval
Phase Ped Detector
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Is Ped Detector No. ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
*Local System Detector No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Is Local Detector No. .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector Log Interval . . 0
*NOTE: System master designations cross referenced to local
system detector numbers are:
SDA1 = 1 & 9
SDA2 = 2 & 10
SDB1 = 3 & 11
SDB2 = 4 & 12
SDC1 = 5 & 13
SDC2 = 6 & 14
SDD1 = 7 & 15
SDD2 = 8 & 16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 300 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Diagnostic Plans/Fail Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 301 of
Detector
Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1 Diagnostic
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
15
15
15
15
15
1
15
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Detector
Plan
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 301 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Diagnostic Plans/Fail Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 302 of
Detector
Plan
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Detector
Plan
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 302 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Ped Diagnostic Plans
Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 303 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Detector Diagnostic Intervals
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic *No -Activity
*Max Presence
Number Diagnostic Interval
Diagnostic Interval
Erratic Counts
1 2
2
80
2 0
0
0
3 0
0
0
4 0
0
0
5 0
0
0
6 0
0
0
7 0
0
0
8 0
0
0
9 0
0
0
10 0
0
0
11 0
0
0
12 0
0
0
13 0
0
0
14 0
0
0
15 0
0
0
16 0
0
0
17 0
0
0
18 0
0
0
19 0
0
0
20 0
0
0
21 0
0
0
22 0
0
0
23 0
0
0
24 0
0
0
25 0
0
0
26 0
0
0
27 0
0
0
28 0
0
0
29 0
0
0
30 0
0
0
31 0
0
0
32 0
0
0
*NOTE: Scaling is specified in each detector diagnostic plan.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 304 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Speed Detectors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inches
NOTE: Speed Detector 1 = STA, Speed Detector 2 = STB
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 305 of
Local
Speed
Detector
One Detector Speed:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vehicle Length .......
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Loop Length. . . . . . . .
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Two Detector Speed:
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Speed Trap Length. .....
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Local
Speed
Detector
One Detector Speed:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vehicle Length .......
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Loop Length. . . . . . . .
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Two Detector Speed:
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Speed Trap Length. .....
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inches
NOTE: Speed Detector 1 = STA, Speed Detector 2 = STB
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 305 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Coordinator Manual Command and Options
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Manual Enable . . . .
.
Pattern . . . . . .
. 1
Split Units . . . . .
Seconds
OffsetUnits .
. . . .
Seconds
Interconnect Format .
STD
Interconnect
Source .
TLM
Transition. . . . . .
SMOOTH
Dwell Period.
. . . .
0
Resync Count. . . . .
3
Actuated Coord Phase
. . . X
Actuated Walk Rest
Inhibit Max Timing .
. . . X
Max 2 Select . . .
. . . .
Floating Force Off
Multisync. . . . .
. . . .
Phase
Split Demand: Call Time
Cyc Count
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Demand 1 0
0
.
Demand 2 0
0
. .
Auto Permissive Min Green .
Free Alternate Sequence . .
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A B C D E F
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 306 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Coordination Patterns
---------------------
Pattern 1
Cycle Length . . 80 COS . . . . . 111
Offset . . . . . 32
Vehicle Permissive . . [1] 0 [2] 0
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement 0 Phase Reservice. NO
Splits: Phase 1- 13 2- 37 3- 0 4- 30
Phase 5- 13 6- 37 7- 0 8- 30
Phase 9- 0 10- 0 11- 0 12- 0 Split Sum: 0
Split Extension/Ring [1] 0 [2] 0
Split Demand Pattern [1] 0 [2] 0
XRT Pattern. . . 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Pattern 2
Cycle Length 85 COS . . . . . 211
Offset . . . . . 18
Vehicle Permissive [1]
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement
Splits: Phase 1- 13 2 -
Phase 5- 13 6 -
Phase 9- 0 10 -
Split Extension/Ring [1]
Split Demand Pattern [1]
XRT Pattern. . . 0
0 [2] 0
0 Phase Reservice
35 3- 0 4- 37
35 7- 0 8- 37
0 11- 0 12- 0
0 [2] 0
0 [2] 0
NO
Split Sum: 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Pattern 3
Cycle Length 85 COS . . . . . 311
Offset . . . . . 24
Vehicle Permissive . . [1]
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement
Splits: Phase 1- 13 2 -
Phase 5- 13 6 -
Phase 9- 0 10 -
Split Extension/Ring [1]
Split Demand Pattern [1]
XRT Pattern. . . 0
0 [2] 0
0 Phase Reservice.
41 3- 0 4- 31
41 7- 0 8- 31
0 11- 0 12- 0
0 [2] 0
0 [2] 0
. NO
Split Sum: 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 307 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Preemptors
Preemptor 1
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Ped Dark . . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Ped Active
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Ped Clr Thru Yel X
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . . X
Delay Time . . . .
1
Hold Delay Time.
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
4.5 1.5
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
4
0.0 0.0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
15
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 1
4.5 1.5
Track Clear . . . . 22
4.5 1.5
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . X .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 2
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . . X
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
Exit Max . . . . .
Min Hold Time. . .
Hold Delay Time.
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 1
4.5 1.5
Track Clear . . . . 22
4.5 1.5
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Ped Dark . . . . . .
Ped Active
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Ped Clr Thru Yel X
0
1
0
4
0
0
15
0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . X .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 308 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Preemptors
Preemptor 3
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 4
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 309 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Preemptors
Preemptor 5
Active . . . . . . . . . . .
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
Hold Delay Time.
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
0.0 0.0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
0.0 0.0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
0
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 6
Active . . . . . . . . . . .
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
Exit Max . . . . .
Min Hold Time. . .
Hold Delay Time.
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Ped Dark . . . . .
Ped Active . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 310 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Bus Preemptors
Preemptor 1 . . . . .
Preemptor 2 . . . . .
Preemptor 3 . . . . .
Preemptor 4 . . . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 311 of
Bus Preemptor
1
2 3
4
Preemptor Active. . . . .
. . .
Detector Lock . . . . . .
. . .
Maximum Time. . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Reservice Time. . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Delay Time . . . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Inhibit Time. . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Green. . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Ped Clearance. .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Yellow . . . . .
. . . 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Entrance Red. . . . . . .
. . . 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Minimum Hold Time . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Hold Phases
1
2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Preemptor 1 . . . . .
Preemptor 2 . . . . .
Preemptor 3 . . . . .
Preemptor 4 . . . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 311 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
NIC/TOD Clock/Calendar
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Manual NIC Program Step . . . . . . . . 0
Manual TOD Program Step . . . . . . . . 0
NIC Resync Time . . . . . . . . . . . . 0315
Sync Reference is . . . . . . . . . . . Reference Time
Week 1 Begins on 1st Sunday . . . . . . NO If NO, then week containing Jan. 1
Disable Daylight Savings Time . . . . . NO
Daylight Savings
Begins Last Sunday in March . . . . . . NO If NO, then Second Sunday as per 2007 DST Law
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 312 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
TOD Weekly/Yearly
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Weekly Program Numbers
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 313 of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sunday ...
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Monday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Tuesday. ..
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Wednesday.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Thursday .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Friday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Saturday
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Week
of
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16 17
18
Prog 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 34 35
36
P r o g 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51 52 53
P r o g 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 313 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
Holiday Programs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Holiday
Type
Month
Day of Week/
Week of Year/
Program
Day of Month
Year
1
Fixed
0
0
0
0
2
Fixed
0
0
0
0
3
Fixed
0
0
0
0
4
Fixed
0
0
0
0
5
Fixed
0
0
0
0
6
Fixed
0
0
0
0
7
Fixed
0
0
0
0
8
Fixed
0
0
0
0
9
Fixed
0
0
0
0
10
Fixed
0
0
0
0
11
Fixed
0
0
0
0
12
Fixed
0
0
0
0
13
Fixed
0
0
0
0
14
Fixed
0
0
0
0
15
Fixed
0
0
0
0
16
Fixed
0
0
0
0
17
Fixed
0
0
0
0
18
Fixed
0
0
0
0
19
Fixed
0
0
0
0
20
Fixed
0
0
0
0
21
Fixed
0
0
0
0
22
Fixed
0
0
0
0
23
Fixed
0
0
0
0
24
Fixed
0
0
0
0
25
Fixed
0
0
0
0
26
Fixed
0
0
0
0
27
Fixed
0
0
0
0
28
Fixed
0
0
0
0
29
Fixed
0
0
0
0
30
Fixed
0
0
0
0
31
Fixed
0
0
0
0
32
Fixed
0
0
0
0
33
Fixed
0
0
0
0
34
Fixed
0
0
0
0
35
Fixed
0
0
0
0
36
Fixed
0
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 314 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
NIC Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step
Program
Step Begins
Pattern
Override
1
1
0600
2
NO
2
1
0900
1
NO
3
1
1500
3
NO
4
1
1900
1
NO
5
1
2300
0
NO
6
2
0700
1
NO
7
2
2300
0
NO
8
3
0700
1
NO
9
3
2100
0
NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 315 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 1 Program 1
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0600
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 2 Program 1
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1900
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 316 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 3 Program 2
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0700
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 4 Program 2
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1800
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 317 of
US 14 & IL 83 US 14 & EMERSON 6/30/2016 16:25
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 5 Program 3
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0900
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 6 Program 3
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1700
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 318 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Configuration
Overlap
A B C D
Direction . . .
Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only):
Load
Signal
Switch
Controller
Sequence
Priority
Phase/
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8 9
10
Ring 1 Phases
1
2
3
4
9
10 0
0 0
0
Ring 2 Phases
5
6
7
8
X11
12 1 0
0 0
0
9 . . . . .
. 2
X
10 . . . . .
. 4
Phase
11 . . . . .
. 6
X
1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8 9
10
In Use . . . . .
. X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
Exclusive Ped
Direction . . .
.
Overlap
A B C D
Direction . . .
Load Switch Channel/Driver Group Assign (Info Only):
Load
Signal
Switch
Driver
Group
(MMU)
Phase/
Channel
Ovlap
Ped
1 . . . .
1
2 . . . . .
. 2
3 . . . . .
. 3
4 . . . . .
. 4
5 . . . . .
. 5
6 . . . . .
. 6
7 . . . . .
. 7
8 . . . .
8
9 . . . . .
. 2
X
10 . . . . .
. 4
X
11 . . . . .
. 6
X
12 . . . . .
. 8
X
13 . . . . .
. A
14 . . . . .
. B
15 . . . . .
. C
16 . . . . .
. D
11 12
0 0
0 0
11 12
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 319 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Configuration Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Enable BIU: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Terminal/Facilities. . . . X X .
Detector Rack. . . . . . . X .
Type 2 Runs as Type 1. . . X
MMU Disable. . . . . . . . .
Diagnostic Enable. . . . . .
Peer -Peer Comm Enable. . . .
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Peer To Peer Addresses 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255
Port 2:
Port 2
Protocol . . . . . .
. . Terminal
Port 2
Enable . . . . . . .
. . NO
AB3418
Address. . . . . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Group Address. . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Response Delay . . .
. . 0
AB3418
Single Flag Enable .
. . NO
AB3418
Drop -Out Time. . . .
. . 0
AB3418
TOD SF Select. . . .
. . 0
Data Rate
. . . . . . . . .
. . 1200 bps
Data,
Parity, Stop. . . . .
. . 8, 0, 1
Port 3:
Port 3 Protocol . . . . . . .
. Telemetry
Port 3 Enable . . . . . . . .
. YES
Telemetry Address. . . . . .
. 11
System Detector 9-16 Address.
. 0
Telemetry Response Delay. . .
. 2000
AB3418 Address. . . . . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Group Address. . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Response Delay . . . .
. 0
AB3418 Single Flag Enable . .
. NO
AB3418 Drop -Out Time. . . . .
. 0
AB3418 TOD SF Select. . . . .
. 0
Duplex . . . . . . . . . . . .
. Full
Data Rate . . . . . . . . . .
. 9600 bps
Data, Parity, Stop. . . . . .
. 8, 0, 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 320 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Configuration Continued
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Event Enabling
Critical RFE'S (MMU/TF) . . . . .
Non -Critical RFE'S (DET/TEST) . .
Detector Errors . . . . . . . . .
Coordination Errors . . . . . . .
MMU Flash Faults. . . . . . . . .
Local Flash Faults. . . . . . . .
Preempt . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Power On/Off . . . . . . . . . . .
Low Battery . . . . . . . . . . .
Supervisor Access Code. . . ****
Data Change Access Code ****
Alarm Enabling
X ALARM
1 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
2 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
3 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
4 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
5 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
6 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
7 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
8 . . . . . . . . . . .
X ALARM
9 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
10 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
11 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
12 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
13 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
14 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
15 . . . . . . . . . . .
ALARM
16 . . . . . . . . . . .
MMU Compatibility Program (Info Only)
Channel
Version Info:
Software Assy.
Boot
Program
Application
Help
Configuration
Is
Allowed to
Time
With
Channel
16 15 14 13
. . . .
. . . .
12 11 10
. . .
. . .
9 8
. .
. .
7
.
.
6 5 4 3 2
. . . . .
. . . .
Part No.
27831
45561
27891
27911
Version
2.83
6.8
. 3
5.43
C040❑
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 321 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 322 of
Phase
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Direction
Minimum Green
3
15
3
15
3
15
3
15
0
0
0
0
Bike Min Green
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cond Sery Min Grn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Walk
0
7
0
7
0
7
0
7
0
0
0
0
Ped Clearance
0
17
0
17
0
18
0
16
0
0
0
0
Veh Extension
3.0
7.0
3.0
7.0
3.0
7.0
3.0
7.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Alt Veh Exten
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max Extension
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Max 1
15
30
15
30
15
30
15
30
0
0
0
0
Max 2
20
40
20
40
20
40
20
40
0
0
0
0
Max 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Det. Fail Max
9
30
9
20
9
30
9
20
0
0
0
0
Yellow Change
3.0
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
Red Clearance
0.0
1.5
0.0
1.5
0.0
1.5
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Red Revert
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Act. B4 Init
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sec/Actuation
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Max Initial
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time B4 Reduction
8
15
8
15
8
15
8
15
0
0
0
0
Cars Waiting
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Time To Reduce
5
8
5
8
5
8
5
8
0
0
0
0
Minimum Gap
2.0
6.0
2.0
6.0
2.0
6.0
2.0
6.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 322 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
No -Serve Phases
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase Cannot Serve With Phase
Phase 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
1.
2. . .
3. . .
4. . .
5. . .
6. . .
7. . .
8.
9. . .
10. . .
11.
2
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 323 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Ped Carryover
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ped Start Phase Carry Over Phase
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
10 0
11 0
12 0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 324 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Vehicle/Ped Phase as Overlap
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ped Phase As Overlap
Ped Consists of Ped Phases
Ovlap
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Veh Phase As Overlap
Veh Consists of Veh Phases
Ovlap
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 X
2 X
3 X
4 X
5 X
6 X
7 X
8 X
9 X
10 X
11 X
12 X
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 325 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Overlap Data
Overlap A Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Overlap B Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Overlap C Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Overlap D Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Standard. . . . . . . .
Protected . . . . . . .
Permitted . . . . . . .
Enable Lag. . . . . . .
Enable Lead . . . . . .
Spare . . . . . . . . .
Advance Green Timer . . . . . . . 0.0
Green Yellow Red
Lag/Lead Timers . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 326 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Power Start, Remote Flash
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Power Start . . . . . X X .
External Start . . . X X .
Into Remote Flash. X X .
Exit Remote Flash. X X Overlap
Remote Flash Yellow. A B C D
Flash Together . . . .
Initialization Interval:
Power Start . . . . . . . . Yellow
External Start. . . . . . . Yellow
Power Start All Red Time. . 0
Power Start Flash Time. . . 0
Remote Flash Options:
Out of Flash Yellow . . . . YES
Out of Flash All Red. . . . NO
Minimum Recall. . . . . . . YES
Alternate Flash . . . . . . NO
Flash Thru Load Switches. . NO
Cycle Through Phases. . . . NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 327 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Option Data
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Guaranteed Passage .
Call To NonActuated 1
Call To NonActuated 2
Dual Entry. . . . . . .
Conditional Service . .
Conditional Reservice
Actuated Rest in Walk
Flashing Walk . . . . .
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X X .
X X X X .
Enable Programmable Options
Dual Entry. . . . . . . . . .
. ON
Backup Protection
Group
1 . .
. . ON
Conditional Service . . . . .
. OFF
Backup Protection
Group
2 . .
. . ON
Ped Clearance Protection. . .
. OFF
Backup Protection
Group
3 . .
. . OFF
Special Preempt Overlap Flash
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
1. . .
. . ON
Cond Service Det Cross Switch
OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
2. . .
. . ON
Lock Detectors in Red Only. .
. OFF
Simultaneous Gap
Group
3. . .
. . OFF
Five
Section
Left Turn Control
Phases: 5-2 7-4
1-6
3-8 11-10
9-12
Left Turn Head. . . . X
X
X X
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 328 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Recall Data, Dimming
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Locking Detector. . . .
Vehicle Recall. . . . .
Pedestrian Recall . . .
Recall To Max . . . . .
Soft Recall . . . . . .
Don't Rest Here . . . .
Ped Dark if No Call . .
Dimming:
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X X X X .
X X .
Load Switch
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Green/Walk. . . . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Yellow/Ped Clear. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Red/Don't Walk. . NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 329 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Detector Type/Timers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Det 1: Detector 1
Det 2: Detector 2
Det 3: Detector 3
Det 4: Detector 4
Det 5: Detector 5
Det 6: Detector 6
Det 7: Detector 7
Det 8: Detector 8
Det 9: Detector 9
Det 10: Detector 10
Det 11: Detector 11
Det 12: Detector 12
Det 13: Detector 13
Det 14: Detector 14
Det 15: Detector 15
Det 16: Detector 16
Don't Reset
Extend Type
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
6 - Calling
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
6 - Calling
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
Detector Names
Det 17: Detector 17
Det 18: Detector 18
Det 19: Detector 19
Det 20: Detector 20
Det 21: Detector 21
Det 22: Detector 22
Det 23: Detector 23
Det 24: Detector 24
Det 25: Detector 25
Det 26: Detector 26
Det 27: Detector 27
Det 28: Detector 28
Det 29: Detector 29
Det 30: Detector 30
Det 31: Detector 31
Det 32: Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 330 of
Locking
Log
Timers
Det.
Memory
Enable
Extend
Delay
1
NO
NO
0.0
0
2
NO
NO
0.0
0
3
NO
NO
0.0
0
4
NO
NO
0.0
0
5
NO
NO
0.0
0
6
NO
NO
0.0
0
7
NO
NO
0.0
0
8
NO
NO
0.0
0
9
NO
NO
0.0
0
10
NO
NO
0.0
0
11
NO
NO
0.0
0
12
NO
NO
0.0
0
13
NO
NO
0.0
0
14
NO
NO
0.0
0
15
NO
NO
0.0
0
16
NO
NO
0.0
0
17
NO
NO
0.0
0
18
NO
NO
0.0
0
19
NO
NO
0.0
0
20
NO
NO
0.0
0
21
NO
NO
0.0
0
22
NO
NO
0.0
0
23
NO
NO
0.0
0
24
NO
NO
0.0
0
25
NO
NO
0.0
0
26
NO
NO
0.0
0
27
NO
NO
0.0
0
28
NO
NO
0.0
0
29
NO
NO
0.0
0
30
NO
NO
0.0
0
31
NO
NO
0.0
0
32
NO
NO
0.0
0
Det 1: Detector 1
Det 2: Detector 2
Det 3: Detector 3
Det 4: Detector 4
Det 5: Detector 5
Det 6: Detector 6
Det 7: Detector 7
Det 8: Detector 8
Det 9: Detector 9
Det 10: Detector 10
Det 11: Detector 11
Det 12: Detector 12
Det 13: Detector 13
Det 14: Detector 14
Det 15: Detector 15
Det 16: Detector 16
Don't Reset
Extend Type
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
1 - Extend/Delay
6 - Calling
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
6 - Calling
1 - Extend/Delay
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
0 - Normal
Detector Names
Det 17: Detector 17
Det 18: Detector 18
Det 19: Detector 19
Det 20: Detector 20
Det 21: Detector 21
Det 22: Detector 22
Det 23: Detector 23
Det 24: Detector 24
Det 25: Detector 25
Det 26: Detector 26
Det 27: Detector 27
Det 28: Detector 28
Det 29: Detector 29
Det 30: Detector 30
Det 31: Detector 31
Det 32: Detector 32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 330 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Detector Type/Timers
-----------------------------------------------------------------
33
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
34
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
35
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
36
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
37
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
38
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
39
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
40
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
41
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
42
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
43
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
44
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
45
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
46
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
47
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
48
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
49
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
50
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
51
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
52
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
53
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
54
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
55
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
56
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
57
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
58
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
59
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
60
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
61
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
62
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
63
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
64
NO
NO
0.0
0
0
- Normal
Detector Names
Det 33: Detector 33
Det 34: Detector 34
Det 35: Detector 35
Det 36: Detector 36
Det 37: Detector 37
Det 38: Detector 38
Det 39: Detector 39
Det 40: Detector 40
Det 41: Detector 41
Det 42: Detector 42
Det 43: Detector 43
Det 44: Detector 44
Det 45: Detector 45
Det 46: Detector 46
Det 47: Detector 47
Det 48: Detector 48
Det 49: Detector 49
Det 50: Detector 50
Det 51: Detector 51
Det 52: Detector 52
Det 53: Detector 53
Det 54: Detector 54
Det 55: Detector 55
Det 56: Detector 56
Det 57: Detector 57
Det 58: Detector 58
Det 59: Detector 59
Det 60: Detector 60
Det 61: Detector 61
Det 62: Detector 62
Det 63: Detector 63
Det 64: Detector 64
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 331 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Detector Phase Assignment
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 332 of
Phase
Det.
1 2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12
1
X
2
X
3
X
4
X
5
X
6
X
7
X
8
X
9
X
10
X
11
X
12
X
13
14
15
X
16
X
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 332 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Detector Cross Switching
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 333 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Detector Cross Switching
Phase
Det. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 334 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Ped/SD Local Assign,Log Interval
Phase Ped Detector
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Is Ped Detector No. ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
*Local System Detector No.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Is Local Detector No. .. 3 4 7 8 5 6 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector Log Interval . . 15
*NOTE: System master designations cross referenced to local
system detector numbers are:
SDA1 = 1 & 9
SDA2 = 2 & 10
SDB1 = 3 & 11
SDB2 = 4 & 12
SDC1 = 5 & 13
SDC2 = 6 & 14
SDD1 = 7 & 15
SDD2 = 8 & 16
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 335 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Diagnostic Plans/Fail Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 336 of
Detector
Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1 Diagnostic
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
Scaling
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
1
1
15
15
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Detector
Plan
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 336 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Diagnostic Plans/Fail Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 337 of
Detector
Plan
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Detector
Plan
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
1 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8 Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
*Fail Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*NOTE: 0 = No Action, 1 = Min Recall, 2 = Max Recall in Effect
3 = Detector Fail Max Tiime from By -Phase Timing Data
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 337 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Ped Diagnostic Plans
Plan
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
Diagnostic
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Scaling
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 338 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Detector Diagnostic Intervals
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnostic *No -Activity
*Max Presence
Number Diagnostic Interval
Diagnostic Interval
Erratic Counts
1 2
2
80
2 0
0
0
3 0
0
0
4 0
0
0
5 0
0
0
6 0
0
0
7 0
0
0
8 0
0
0
9 0
0
0
10 0
0
0
11 0
0
0
12 0
0
0
13 0
0
0
14 0
0
0
15 0
0
0
16 0
0
0
17 0
0
0
18 0
0
0
19 0
0
0
20 0
0
0
21 0
0
0
22 0
0
0
23 0
0
0
24 0
0
0
25 0
0
0
26 0
0
0
27 0
0
0
28 0
0
0
29 0
0
0
30 0
0
0
31 0
0
0
32 0
0
0
*NOTE: Scaling is specified in each detector diagnostic plan.
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 339 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Speed Detectors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inches
NOTE: Speed Detector 1 = STA, Speed Detector 2 = STB
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 340 of
Local
Speed
Detector
One Detector Speed:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vehicle Length .......
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Loop Length. . . . . . . .
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Two Detector Speed:
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Speed Trap Length. .....
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Local
Speed
Detector
One Detector Speed:
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vehicle Length .......
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Loop Length. . . . . . . .
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Two Detector Speed:
Local Detector Number. ...
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Speed Trap Length. .....
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inches
NOTE: Speed Detector 1 = STA, Speed Detector 2 = STB
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 340 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Coordinator Manual Command and Options
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Manual Enable . . . .
.
Pattern . . . . . .
. 0
Split Units . . . . .
Seconds
OffsetUnits .
. . . .
Seconds
Interconnect Format .
STD
Interconnect
Source .
TLM
Transition. . . . . .
SMOOTH
Dwell Period.
. . . .
0
Resync Count. . . . .
3
Actuated Coord Phase
. . . X
Actuated Walk Rest
Inhibit Max Timing .
. . . X
Max 2 Select . . .
. . . .
Floating Force Off
Multisync. . . . .
. . . .
Phase
Split Demand: Call Time
Cyc Count
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Demand 1 0
0
.
Demand 2 0
0
. .
Auto Permissive Min Green .
Free Alternate Sequence . .
Phase
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A B C D E F
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 341 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Coordination Patterns
---------------------
Pattern 1
Cycle Length . . 80 COS . . . . . 111
Offset . . . . . 69
Vehicle Permissive . . [1] 0 [2] 0
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement 0 Phase Reservice. NO
Splits: Phase 1- 10 2- 30 3- 10 4- 30
Phase 5- 10 6- 30 7- 10 8- 30
Phase 9- 0 10- 0 11- 0 12- 0 Split Sum: 0
Split Extension/Ring [1] 0 [2] 0
Split Demand Pattern [1] 0 [2] 0
XRT Pattern. . . 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall X X
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Pattern 2
Cycle Length 85 COS . . . . . 211
Offset . . . . . 62
Vehicle Permissive . . [1]
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement
Splits: Phase 1- 13 2 -
Phase 5- 13 6 -
Phase 9- 0 10 -
Split Extension/Ring [1]
Split Demand Pattern [1]
XRT Pattern. . . 0
0 [2] 0
0 Phase Reservice
27 3- 14 4- 31
27 7- 14 8- 31
0 11- 0 12- 0
0 [2] 0
0 [2] 0
NO
Split Sum: 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall X X
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Pattern 3
Cycle Length 85 COS . . . . . 311
Offset . . . . . 75
Vehicle Permissive . . [1]
Vehicle Perm 2 Displacement
Splits: Phase 1- 13 2 -
Phase 5- 13 6 -
Phase 9- 0 10 -
Split Extension/Ring [1]
Split Demand Pattern [1]
XRT Pattern. . . 0
0 [2] 0
0 Phase Reservice.
27 3- 14 4- 31
27 7- 14 8- 31
0 11- 0 12- 0
0 [2] 0
0 [2] 0
. NO
Split Sum: 0
Phase Number: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Coord Phases X X
Veh Recall X X
Veh Max Recall
Ped Recall
Veh Omit
Alt Sequence A: B: C: D: E: F:
-------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 342 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Preemptors
Preemptor 1
Active . . . . . . . . . . .
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
Hold Delay Time.
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
0.0 0.0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
0.0 0.0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
0
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 2
Active . . . . . . . . . . .
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
Exit Max . . . . .
Min Hold Time. . .
Hold Delay Time.
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Ped Dark . . . . .
Ped Active . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 343 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Preemptors
Preemptor 3
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
4.5 2.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 4
Active . . . . . . . . . . . X
Det Lock. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . . X
Max Time . . . . .
180
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
10
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 5
4.5 2.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . X X .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 344 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Preemptors
Preemptor 5
Active . . . . . . . . . . .
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Ped Dark . . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Ped Active . . . .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Ped Clr Thru Yel
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
0
Hold Delay Time.
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
0
0.0 0.0
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
0
0.0 0.0
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
0
Exit Max . . . . .
0
Min Hold Time. . .
0
Hold Delay Time.
0
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Preemptor 6
Active . . . . . . . . . . .
Det Lock. . . . .
Priority Preemption. . . . .
Yel-Red To Grn. .
Outputs Only During Hold
Flash All Outputs
Terminate Overlap ASAP
Terminate Phases.
Don't Override Flash
Duration Time. . .
Flash During Hold. . . . . .
Delay Time . . . .
No CVM in Flash. . . . . . .
Inhibit Time . . .
Fast Flash Grn on Hold Phase. .
Min Ped Clear. . .
Enable Max Time. . . . . . .
Max Time . . . . .
Exit Max . . . . .
Min Hold Time. . .
Hold Delay Time.
Green
Yellow Red
Minimum . . . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Track Clear . . . . 0
0.0 0.0
Hold. . . . . . . .
0.0 0.0
Ped Dark . . . . .
Ped Active . . . .
Zero Ped Clr Time.
Ped Clr Thru Yel
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Phase/Overlap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/ A B C D
Terminate Overlap . . . . .
Track Clearance Phase . . .
Hold Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Phases . . . . . . . .
Exit Calls on Phase . . . .
Out of Flash Color for Exit Phases . . . . Green
Linked Preemptor . . . . 0
----------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 345 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Bus Preemptors
Preemptor 1 . . . . .
Preemptor 2 . . . . .
Preemptor 3 . . . . .
Preemptor 4 . . . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 346 of
Bus Preemptor
1
2 3
4
Preemptor Active. . . . .
. . .
Detector Lock . . . . . .
. . .
Maximum Time. . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Reservice Time. . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Delay Time . . . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Inhibit Time. . . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Green. . . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Ped Clearance. .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Entrance Yellow . . . . .
. . . 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Entrance Red. . . . . . .
. . . 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
Minimum Hold Time . . . .
. . . 0
0 0
0
Hold Phases
1
2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
Preemptor 1 . . . . .
Preemptor 2 . . . . .
Preemptor 3 . . . . .
Preemptor 4 . . . . .
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 346 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
NIC/TOD Clock/Calendar
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Manual NIC Program Step . . . . . . . . 0
Manual TOD Program Step . . . . . . . . 0
NIC Resync Time . . . . . . . . . . . . 0315
Sync Reference is . . . . . . . . . . . Reference Time
Week 1 Begins on 1st Sunday . . . . . . NO If NO, then week containing Jan. 1
Disable Daylight Savings Time . . . . . NO
Daylight Savings
Begins Last Sunday in March . . . . . . NO If NO, then Second Sunday as per 2007 DST Law
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 347 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
TOD Weekly/Yearly
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Weekly Program Numbers
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 348 of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Sunday ...
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Monday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Tuesday. ..
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Wednesday.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Thursday .
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Friday ...
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Saturday
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Program
No.
Week
of
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16 17
18
Prog 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33 34 35
36
P r o g 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51 52 53
P r o g 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 348 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
Holiday Programs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Holiday
Type
Month
Day of Week/
Week of Year/
Program
Day of Month
Year
1
Fixed
0
0
0
0
2
Fixed
0
0
0
0
3
Fixed
0
0
0
0
4
Fixed
0
0
0
0
5
Fixed
0
0
0
0
6
Fixed
0
0
0
0
7
Fixed
0
0
0
0
8
Fixed
0
0
0
0
9
Fixed
0
0
0
0
10
Fixed
0
0
0
0
11
Fixed
0
0
0
0
12
Fixed
0
0
0
0
13
Fixed
0
0
0
0
14
Fixed
0
0
0
0
15
Fixed
0
0
0
0
16
Fixed
0
0
0
0
17
Fixed
0
0
0
0
18
Fixed
0
0
0
0
19
Fixed
0
0
0
0
20
Fixed
0
0
0
0
21
Fixed
0
0
0
0
22
Fixed
0
0
0
0
23
Fixed
0
0
0
0
24
Fixed
0
0
0
0
25
Fixed
0
0
0
0
26
Fixed
0
0
0
0
27
Fixed
0
0
0
0
28
Fixed
0
0
0
0
29
Fixed
0
0
0
0
30
Fixed
0
0
0
0
31
Fixed
0
0
0
0
32
Fixed
0
0
0
0
33
Fixed
0
0
0
0
34
Fixed
0
0
0
0
35
Fixed
0
0
0
0
36
Fixed
0
0
0
0
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 349 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
NIC Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step
Program
Step Begins
Pattern
Override
1
1
0600
2
NO
2
1
0900
1
NO
3
1
1500
3
NO
4
1
1830
1
NO
5
1
2100
0
NO
6
2
0700
1
NO
7
2
2100
0
NO
8
2
0900
1
NO
9
3
2000
0
NO
10
1
1645
0
YES
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 350 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 1 Program 1
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0600
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 2 Program 1
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1900
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 351 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 3 Program 2
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0700
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 4 Program 2
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1800
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 352 of
US 14 & IL 83 IL 83 & CENTRAL 6/30/2016 16:26
TOD Program Steps
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Step 5 Program 3
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 1
Step Begins 0900
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Step 6 Program 3
Flash. . . . . . . . .
Red Rest . . . . . . .
Spare 5 . . . . . . . .
Spare 3 . . . . . . . .
Type 0 Dly Enable. . .
Det Diag Plan. . . . 0
Step Begins 1700
Dimming Enable. . . . . .
Alt Veh Extension
Det Log Enable. . . . . .
Spare 4 . . . . . . . . .
Spare 2 . . . . . . . . .
Phase Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Max 2 Enable . . . . . .
Max 3 Enable . . . . . .
Veh Recall . . . . . . .
Veh Max Recall . . . . .
Ped Recall . . . . . . .
Cond Service Inhibit.
Phase Omit . . . . . . .
Special Function . . . . .
A B C D E F
Alt Sequence . . . . . . .
---------------------------------------------------
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 353 of
Nflat.iii tt 11-11irospect, &igrt� l Art� ly§s
Village of Mount Prospect
September 2016
7�,III I 1I , 1 I �I I 1 1 11
F111IIII15,111 i I 4 �to W,
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 354 of:
Table of Contents
Train Station Analysis 2
Comparison of Similar Municipalities 4
Analysis of Closure of Prospect Ave. at IL 83 Railroad Crossing 7
Summary of Lake County Passage System and Potential Cost
of Similar System in Mount Prospect 10
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 355 of
Train Station Analysis
Background
For safety reasons, traffic signals located at railroad crossings have interfaces to railroad signal
bungalows. This interface sends a signal from the railroad signal bungalow to the traffic signal
controller when a train is approaching. A series of calculations made by the owner / operators
of the railroad line determines how much time in advance the traffic signal controller needs to be
notified so that vehicles can safely clear the crossing before the train arrives.
Additionally, railroad owner / operators have hold down circuits in place to hold gates down
when a train is parked and unloading or loading in the station. The location of these hold down
circuits varies at each crossing, and that location is based on many factors such as train
acceleration and types of warning device.
The Village of Mount Prospect's goal is to analyze a new Metra station and platform location
such that the railroad gates at the IL 83 crossing are released while passengers are loading and
unloading. This would increase the effieciency of operation of the traffic signal at that location.
Existing Conditions
Currently the minimum warning time of the interface from the railroad bungalow to the traffic
signal controller at US 14 and IL 83 is 25 seconds. This allows the track clearance phases to be
served completely after the railroad gates begin to go down. By the time the train arrives, all
traffic has had sufficient time to clear the tracks and the intersections north and south of the
crossing. The minimum warning time is unlikely to change no matter where the station is
located.
The existing train platform is approximately 970' and extends from the west curb line of IL 83 to
a point between Emerson St. and Maple St.
The longest trains run by Metra during peak hour are 11 passenger cars (85' each) and 2
engines (72' each). The total length of the train is 1080'. This fact means that trains are always
blocking the crossing of IL 83 when stopped at the platform loading and unloading.
At this point we have not yet received information from the Union Pacific on the exact location of
current hold down circuits which would determine how far away from the IL 83 crossing a
potential station would have to be in order for the gates to release for trains that had stopped at
the station and for normal traffic signal operation to resume.
Potential Locations
To begin the preliminary process of planning for a new train station location, we have included a
figure on the following page with two potential locations for a new station. Each station has an
1100' platform to allow for the longest trains that Metra runs during rush hour. One station is
located in between the Central Rd. and IL 83 crossings, and one is located east of Emerson St.
PA
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 356 of
Each station is located at least 500' away from the major railroad crossings of US 14 & Central
Rd. and US 14 & IL 83. This may increase the odds, but would not guarantee, that a train could
be parked at the station and allow the gates to release. Further coordination in the future with
the Union Pacific and the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) would be required to achieve
this goal.
Action Steps
After speaking to Metra and the ICC in developing this report, we have determined that going
forward the Union Pacific Railroad will be the key decision making agency to coordinate to
achieve the goal. Once the Village selects a preferred location, the following action steps would
need to take place to achieve the desired goal
Coordinate with Union Pacific staff to determine location of existing hold down
circuits.
Working with Union Pacific staff to determine feasibility of moving circuits.
At this point in the process, without detailed information from the Union Pacific on hold down
circuits we cannot speak to the probability that the goal of having gates up when a train is
parked can be achieved.
3
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 357 of
Comparison of Similar Municipalities
Mount Prospect is not alone in congestion caused by traffic signals interconnected to railroad
crossings. Sam Schwartz has collected data from 3 similar signalized crossings to compare to
operations in Downtown Mount Prospect. The 3 locations were chosen due to the proximity to
Metra stations and the large ADT (Average Daily Traffic) on arterials adjacent to or crossing the
railroad tracks. The following is a brief description of each crossing:
Arlington Heights - US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) @ Arlington Heights Rd.
Located on the same Metra line, this crossing is similar to Downtown Mount Prospect in that it
has arterials with significant traffic running both parallel to (US 14 - Northwest Hwy) and
perpendicular to (Arlington Heights Rd.) the crossing. Differences from the IL 83 crossing in
Mount Prospect are that the Metra loading platform is located 800' west of this crossing instead
of directly adjacent to it. The crossing also does not have a street running south of the railroad
tracks that intersects with the north -south arterial like Prospect Ave. does in Mount Prospect.
Des Plaines — US 14 (Miner St.) @ US 12-45 (Lee St.)
This crossing in Downtown Des Plaines on the Union Pacific Northwest Metra line has arterials
with significant traffic running both parallel to (US 14 — Miner St.) and perpendicular (US 12-45
Lee St.) to the crossing. The Metra loading platform is located at the crossing just as in
Downtown Mount Prospect, and a street intersects with Lee St. south of the crossing (Ellinwood
St.) As Lee St. is one-way Northbound, fewer clear out phases, which ensure that vehicles do
not get caught on the tracks, are required in this traffic signal sequence than at the IL 83
crossing in Mount Prospect. This fact allows for shorter cycle lengths.
LaGrange- US 12-20-45 (LaGrange Rd.) @ Burlington Ave. / Hillgrove Ave.
Similar to Downtown Mount Prospect the loading platform at this Metra station is located at the
crossing and parallel streets intersect (Hillgrove Ave. & Burlington Ave.) with the north -south
arterial (La Grange Rd.) on both sides of the crossing. However, Hillgrove Ave. and Burlington
Ave. are collector streets with significantly lower ADT's than US 14 has at the Mount Prospect
crossing. A major east -west arterial, Ogden Ave., is located 560' north of the crossing and has
its operation affected by the railroad crossing even though it is not interconnected directly to the
crossing. Similar to Mount Prospect, the LaGrange Fire Station is located within 2 blocks of the
railroad crossing on Burlington Ave. This can cause additional preemptions of normal signal
operation.
As summarized in Table 1 below, Sam Schwartz collected ADT data of streets intersecting at
each crossing, signal timing data of the corresponding traffic signal, the number of preemptions
during the heaviest 90 minutes of train traffic in AM and PM Peak Periods, and the amount of
time that gates are down at each crossing during those 90 minute peak periods. The data
shows that the Mount Prospect crossing experiences a similar number of preemptions and a
similar amount of time with gates down as the other crossings in Arlington Heights and Des
Plaines on the Union Pacific Northwest Metra line during both 90 minute peak periods. The
Mount Prospect location may have more preemptions than the other 2 locations on the Union
all
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 358 of
Pacific Northwest Metra line because of the proximity of the Mount Prospect Fire Station just
east of Emerson St. on US 14. The crossing in LaGrange on the BNSF Metra Line, experiences
many more interruptions than any of the crossings on the Union Pacific Northwest Line, as it
has both more train interruptions and a similar issue as Mount Prospect does with emergency
vehicle preemptions.
Table 1. — Comparison of Operations at Similar Railroad Crossings
Table 2 summarizes the controller equipment that operates at each of the 4 railroad crossings.
The controller is just one of many components within the traffic signal cabinet that controls
signal operation. Additionally, the signal sequence and cycle lengths are independent factors in
operations that don't rely on controller type. The ASC -3 controller has no added features vs. the
ASC -2s that would bring an intersection into coordination faster after a train or emergency
vehicle preemption. The Mount Prospect crossing has the same controller as the Arlington
Heights controller, the Econolite ASC -2S. Although no longer manufactured by Econolite, IDOT
is still operating hundreds of ASC -2S controllers throughout District 1. ASC -2S have been in
operation for over 20 years. Maintenance on these controllers is still possible because IDOT's
contractor Meade Electric has a large supply of spare parts and controllers should the need
arise. The Des Plaines controller has the next generation of Econolite equipment, the ASC -3.
ASC -3 have been operation by IDOT for over 10 years, and any new installation by IDOT will be
an ASC -3 controller. Meade Electric does the same routine maintenance on ASC -2S controllers
as ASC -3 controllers. In LaGrange the controller is an Eagle that is of similar age to the
Econolite ASC -2S. It is Sam Schwartz opinion that installing an ASC -3 controller at the Mount
Prospect controller would not solve any of the issues caused by frequent preemptions.
61
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 359 of
Train
ADT
# of
Cycle
Interruptions
Community
Location
Average Daily
Signal
Lengths
# / Duration of
Traffic
Phases
(sec)
Gates Down
(Min)
N -S
E -W
AM
PM
AM
PM
Route
Routes
Peak
Peak
JPeak
Peak
Mount Prospect
US 14 @ IL 83
12,500
11,400
10
160
170
17/34
14/32
Main St.
Arlington
US 14 @
26,100
17,200
8
120
130
15/34
17/25
Heights
Arlington
Heights Rd.
Des Plaines
US 14 (Miner
16,700
7,000
5
120
120
15/28
13/31
St.) @ US 12-45
Lee St.
La Grange
US 12-20-45 @
26,800
5,300
6
125
120
23/48
21/36
Burlington /
Hillgrove
Table 2 summarizes the controller equipment that operates at each of the 4 railroad crossings.
The controller is just one of many components within the traffic signal cabinet that controls
signal operation. Additionally, the signal sequence and cycle lengths are independent factors in
operations that don't rely on controller type. The ASC -3 controller has no added features vs. the
ASC -2s that would bring an intersection into coordination faster after a train or emergency
vehicle preemption. The Mount Prospect crossing has the same controller as the Arlington
Heights controller, the Econolite ASC -2S. Although no longer manufactured by Econolite, IDOT
is still operating hundreds of ASC -2S controllers throughout District 1. ASC -2S have been in
operation for over 20 years. Maintenance on these controllers is still possible because IDOT's
contractor Meade Electric has a large supply of spare parts and controllers should the need
arise. The Des Plaines controller has the next generation of Econolite equipment, the ASC -3.
ASC -3 have been operation by IDOT for over 10 years, and any new installation by IDOT will be
an ASC -3 controller. Meade Electric does the same routine maintenance on ASC -2S controllers
as ASC -3 controllers. In LaGrange the controller is an Eagle that is of similar age to the
Econolite ASC -2S. It is Sam Schwartz opinion that installing an ASC -3 controller at the Mount
Prospect controller would not solve any of the issues caused by frequent preemptions.
61
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 359 of
Table 2 — Summary of Controller Equipment
Location
Controller Type
US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) @ IL 83 (Main St.)
Econolite ASC 2s-2100
US 14 (Northwest Hwy.) @ Arlington Heights Rd.
Econolite ASC 2s-2100
US 14 (Miner St.) @ US 12-45 (Lee St.)
Econolite ASC 3-1000
US 12-20-45 (LaGrange Rd.) @ Burlington / Hillgrove
Eagle EPAC300 M42
Conclusion
As the data collected by Sam Schwartz shows, interruptions to normal traffic signal operation
due to railroad and emergency vehicle preemption that drivers experience at the railroad
crossing at IL 83 in Downtown Mount Prospect are similar to those in other municipalities on the
Union Pacific Northwest Metra Line. The crossing in LaGrange has much more frequent train
preemptions than the other three crossings studied. Despite the fact that 3 different versions of
controllers are used at these four crossings, the version or age of the controller equipment has
little or no effect on the operation at these crossings. Although it varies widely day to day,
Mount Prospect sees a similar number of emergency vehicle preemption calls (usually 1 or 2
per peak hour) as LaGrange as both communities have a fire station located within 2 blocks of
the crossing.
The primary difference in traffic signal operation at these railroad crossings is the number of
phases (10) and longer cycle length (up to 170 seconds) required for safe operation at the IL 83
crossing when compared to the other three crossings. Each of the 10 traffic signal phases
serves an individual vehicle movement at the IL 83 crossing. Phases must run separately on
US 14 and Prospect Ave. and be timed on their own to ensure safe clearance over the railroad
crossing. This is not the case in Arlington Heights where there is no street parallel to the
railroad tracks on the south side. Therefore fewer traffic signal phases are required in Arlington
Heights. The additional phases in Mount Prospect can give the perception to drivers of long
waits for their turn to travel through the intersection.
In spite of the fact that two of the crossings studied have significantly higher ADT's than the IL
83 crossing, shorter cycle lengths are still able to be operated at these 2 locations because of
less complex phasing sequences. Sam Schwartz will address alternatives to the current phase
sequence at the IL 83 crossing later in this report.
11
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 360 of
Analysis of Closure of Prospect Ave. at IL 83 Railroad Crossing
As noted previously in this report and in the 2007 and 2016 IDOT signal coordination and timing
studies, the determining factor in operating efficiency at the IL 83 Railroad Crossing in
Downtown Mount Prospect is drastically affected by the number of signal phases required to
safely clear both directions of traffic over the crossing through the intersection. The current
sequence requires 10 phases, 3 of which are clear out phases which ensure that vehicles do
not get stopped on the railroad tracks.
As shown in Table 1, the crossing at US 14 and Arlington Heights Rd. carries approximately
14,000 more vehicles per day northbound and southbound over the crossing than IL 83 does in
Mount Prospect. Shorter cycle lengths (130 seconds vs. 170 seconds) are feasible in Arlington
Heights and not in Mount Prospect because the traffic signal sequence there has only 8 phases.
Two of the clear out phases used in Mount Prospect are not necessary in Arlington Heights,
because on Arlington Heights Rd. there is no parallel street with a traffic signal on the south side
of the tracks. Only a railroad pre -signal on Arlington Heights Rd., which stops northbound
vehicles on red south of the crossing and the accompanying clear out which ensures vehicles
progress northbound through US 14 are required.
If the intersection of Prospect Ave. and IL 83 was made a cul-de-sac on both sides on IL 83,
and that portion of the signal was removed, the signal sequence with 8 phases used in Arlington
Heights could be used in Mount Prospect at the IL 83 crossing. As Table 3 shows below, with
the removal of the signalized movements on Prospect Ave. and the less complex signal
phasing, shorter cycle lengths (or removing half cycles at IL 83 & Central Rd.) could be
implemented throughout the IL 83 & US 14 closed loop traffic signal system. This would
improve the intersection delay and level of service (LOS) at not only the IL 83 crossing, but also
at US 14 & Central.
7
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 361 of
Table 3 — Level of Service Comparison for Major Intersections on IL 83 @ US 14 Closed
Loop System
1 — Cycle Length is the amount of time needed for the signal to complete one cycle around serving every
movement at the intersection
2 - # Phases — Each directional movement at an intersection is controlled by an individual signal phase.
This column highlights the total # of phases at each intersection
3- Level of Service — Signalized intersection level of service (LOS) is defined in terms of the average total
vehicle delay of all movements through an intersection. An acceptable level of performance by IDOT is
typically LOS D.
4 — Intersection Delay — Vehicle Delay is a method of quantifying several intangible factors, including driver
discomfort, frustration, and lost travel time.
Ej
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 362 of
Cycle Lengths'
# of Phases'
Intersection
Intersection Delay (Sec .)4
Peak
Sec
Level of Service 3
Intersection
Period
After
Difference
Before
After*
Before
Before
After*
Before
After*
Sec.
US 14 @
AM
170
130
10
8
C
C
32.0
30.5
1.5
IL 83
PM
170
140
10
8
D
C
41.8
31.9
9.9
US 14 @
AM
170
130
7
7
D
C
38.9
28.0
10.9
Central Rd.
PM
170
140
7
7
D
C
40.6
31.5
9.1
AM
85
130
8
8
C
C
21.4
24.1
-2.5
IL 83 @
Central Rd.
PM
85
140
8
8
D
D
37.5
39.4
-1.9
1 — Cycle Length is the amount of time needed for the signal to complete one cycle around serving every
movement at the intersection
2 - # Phases — Each directional movement at an intersection is controlled by an individual signal phase.
This column highlights the total # of phases at each intersection
3- Level of Service — Signalized intersection level of service (LOS) is defined in terms of the average total
vehicle delay of all movements through an intersection. An acceptable level of performance by IDOT is
typically LOS D.
4 — Intersection Delay — Vehicle Delay is a method of quantifying several intangible factors, including driver
discomfort, frustration, and lost travel time.
Ej
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 362 of
As Table 4 shows below, when individual approach movements are analyzed at the IL 83
crossing, significant improvement is seen in delay and level of service on nearly every approach
in both AM and PM peak periods.
Table 4- Level of Service Comparison for Major Approaches at IL 83 C US 14 Intersection
Before & After Closure of Prospect Ave. at IL 83
Conclusion
As the analysis in Tables 3 and 4 show, significant improvements on the downtown traffic signal
system would occur with the elimination of the signalized phases at IL 83 & Prospect Ave. The
shorter cycle lengths would improve not only levels of service at the US 14 & IL 83 intersection
but also at other intersections on the closed loop system. The individual approach movements
at the US 14 & IL 83 signal would show significant improvements in both peak periods
particularly on US 14. We believe these reductions in delay would be easily perceived by the
motoring public, as the wait for the signal to cycle around would be significantly shorter.
For purposes of this exercise, vehicle volumes that would have been making left turns off
Prospect Ave. have been redistributed in the analysis network as through and right turn
movements at other locations. It would be anticipated that traffic from Prospect Ave. unable to
make left turns with the proposed cul-de-sac configuration would access US 14 at two locations,
US 14 & Central and US 14 & Emerson. The new shorter lengths at US 14 & Central would
allow for shorter wait times for the Prospect Ave. phase at that location. The signal at US 14 &
Emerson may need to use the full system cycle length instead of the current half cycle to handle
the additional northbound traffic demand there that would accessing US 14 from Prospect Ave.
via Emerson St.
We anticipate that eastbound right turns would still be allowed off Prospect Ave. at IL 83, and
would be stop controlled. In our analysis we calculated LOS A for that movement as those
vehicles would have many gaps to make their right turn when US 14 has its green time.
Westbound right turns off Prospect Ave. could not be accommodated safely without a signal due
to the track clearance issue. That westbound leg would require a full closure at IL 83.
A
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 363 of
AM Peak Period
PM Peak Period
Before
After
Before
After
Approach
LOS
Delay
LOS
Delay
Difference
LOS
Delay
LOS
Delay
Difference
(sec.)
(sec.)
(sec.)
(sec.)
(sec.)
(sec.)
US 14
c
28.5
B
18.4
-10.1
D
38.8
A
9.5
-29.3
Eastbound
US 14
D
42
B
16.6
-25.4
E
63.7
c
21.5
-42.2
Westbound
L 83
F
85.2
D
46.4
-38.8
F
81.1
D
50.9
-30.2
Northbound
IL 83
E
60.4
D
38.9
-21.5
E
56.1
D
53.8
-2.3
Southbound
Overall
c
32
c
30.5
-1.5
D
41.8
c
31.9
-9.9
Intersection
Conclusion
As the analysis in Tables 3 and 4 show, significant improvements on the downtown traffic signal
system would occur with the elimination of the signalized phases at IL 83 & Prospect Ave. The
shorter cycle lengths would improve not only levels of service at the US 14 & IL 83 intersection
but also at other intersections on the closed loop system. The individual approach movements
at the US 14 & IL 83 signal would show significant improvements in both peak periods
particularly on US 14. We believe these reductions in delay would be easily perceived by the
motoring public, as the wait for the signal to cycle around would be significantly shorter.
For purposes of this exercise, vehicle volumes that would have been making left turns off
Prospect Ave. have been redistributed in the analysis network as through and right turn
movements at other locations. It would be anticipated that traffic from Prospect Ave. unable to
make left turns with the proposed cul-de-sac configuration would access US 14 at two locations,
US 14 & Central and US 14 & Emerson. The new shorter lengths at US 14 & Central would
allow for shorter wait times for the Prospect Ave. phase at that location. The signal at US 14 &
Emerson may need to use the full system cycle length instead of the current half cycle to handle
the additional northbound traffic demand there that would accessing US 14 from Prospect Ave.
via Emerson St.
We anticipate that eastbound right turns would still be allowed off Prospect Ave. at IL 83, and
would be stop controlled. In our analysis we calculated LOS A for that movement as those
vehicles would have many gaps to make their right turn when US 14 has its green time.
Westbound right turns off Prospect Ave. could not be accommodated safely without a signal due
to the track clearance issue. That westbound leg would require a full closure at IL 83.
A
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 363 of
Summary of Lake County Passage System and Potential Cost of
Similar System in Mount Prospect.
Lake County Division of Transportation's (LCDOT) PASSAGE System is the most advanced
TMC (Traffic Management Center) for signalized intersections in the Chicagoland Area.
Components of the system include:
- Traffic Operations Building at LCDOT offices including data servers, video wall, 3
operator stations
- Direct Fiber Optic or Radio Links to over 400 signalized intersections.
- 2 TMC operators staffed full time between 6:00 AM and 7:00 PM every weekday
- Over 325 Pan -Tilt Zoom Video Surveillance Cameras at key signalized locations which
provide real time video to TMC
- Numerous Layer 2 and Layer 3 Ethernet Switches in the field and at TMC which
organize and route data packets from in -field components back to TMC.
- Econolite Centracs ATMS software which organizes and stores traffic signal databases
for all traffic signals
Agreements with IDOT, Cook County Highway, Illinois Tollway, Municipalities
LCDOT has entered into jurisdictional agreements with IDOT and various local municipalities
that allow the County to control the traffic signals from their TMC at signals they do not own.
For example, Lake County monitors signals on Lake Cook Rd. for operational concerns, even
though those signals are owned by Cook County Highway Department. Lake County also has
an agreement with the Illinois Tollway to share information gathered from vehicles by the
Tollway with the motoring public on the PASSAGE website and mobile apps.
Cost Estimates of a similar system in Mount Prospect
From public records of recent expansions of the LCDOT Passage system, Sam Schwartz has
been able to determine unit costs of the types of equipment that would be necessary to build a
basic TMC at Mount Prospect Public Works offices. For purposes of this exercise, we will
develop a rough cost estimate to connect the 3 closed loop systems currently being studied for
IDOT by Sam Schwartz operational concerns:
US 14 @ IL 83 System (4 signals)
US 12 @ Central Rd. System (3 signals)
US 12 @ IL 83 System (9 signals)
Fiber Optic Cable
In order for a TMC to function, fiber optic cable would need to be connected from a centralized
location (in this case the Mount Prospect Public Works Building) to the 3 closed loop systems.
This fiber optic cable is necessary to pull back video and other information to the TMC. To
connect the 3 systems mentioned above to the Public Works Building would require
Zo
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 364 of
construction of about 15,000 ft. of fiber optic cable in conduit. This estimate does not include
existing fiber optic cable on these traffic signal systems, which may or may not require
replacement to be connected to a TMC.
Estimated Cost - $32 / ft. installed in conduit- $480,000
Pan Tilt Zoom Cameras
Pan Tilt Zoom Surveillance Cameras (PTZ) are used in the field to provide a TMC with flexibility
to monitor a wide area of coverage in all directions with a single camera at key intersection
locations. In the Village's case a minimum of 4 cameras would be needed to monitor the
following intersections:
US 14 & Central Rd.
US 14 / IL 83 / Prospect Ave.
US 12 / IL 83 / Kensington Rd.
Central Rd. & Mount Prospect Rd.
Estimated Cost - $35,000 per installation - $140,000
Ethernet Switches
In order to bring back the large amount of data from PTZ cameras, a series of Ethernet switches
are required in both the field and at the TMC centralized location to organize and sort the data
for processing. In the Village's proposed case a minimum of one switch per PTZ location and 1
at the TMC would be needed.
Estimated Cost - $15,000 per switch - $75,000
Cabinet Rebuilds
Existing Traffic Signal Cabinets may not be properly equipped to house the additional
equipment required to communicate back to a TMC. A new signal cabinet could be required at
each location that would report back to a TMC. On these 3 systems there are a total of 16
signals.
Estimated Cost - $35,000 per cabinet replacement - $560,000 total
Econolite CENTRACS TMC Software
New Econolite CENTRACS database software would need to be installed at the TMC in order to
maintain traffic signal databases and perform other functions;
Estimated Cost - $20,000
11
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 365 of
Required Staffing
Lake County currently has 2 TMC operators working full time, in the case of the Village a full
time person would not be needed because there would be so many fewer signals to monitor. It
likely would be a person spending approximately 1/2 of their work schedule monitoring the
signals at the TMC during AM and PM peak periods.
Estimated Cost - $40,000 / year (including benefits)
Maintenance Cost
Based on recent maintenance contracts awarded in Kane County and Lake County, two
agencies with TMC components, we are seeing an average cost of about $7,000 / year per
signal on these awarded contracts.
Estimated Maintenance Cost for Mount Prospect - $110,000 / year
Conclusion
In our basic analysis presented here an estimated cost for a TMC could easily exceed $1.3
million to just convert these 3 signalized closed systems that Sam Schwartz is currently studying
for IDOT. If other locations were desired for the TMC, such as the closed loop systems at
Busse -Dempster -Algonquin and the system adjacent to the Public Works Building on Central
Rd., the cost would obviously rise even higher. If the Village desired the ultimate authority to
make real time changes via the TMC, it is our view that IDOT would want the Village to take
over maintenance of all IDOT owned signals.
12
Committee of the Whole Meeting - November 9, 2016 Page 366 of