HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW Agenda 2/23/2016COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
Meeting Location:
50 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, I L 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday, February 23, 2016
7:00 PM
MayorArlene A. Juracek
Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Richard Rogers
Trustee John Matuszak Trustee Colleen Saccotelli
Trustee Steven Polit Trustee Michael Zadel
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Committee of the Whole Minutes of January 26, 2016
III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
IV. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE/DOWNTOWN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION -
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES
The Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Merchants Association will present their
recently adopted "Downtown Redevelopment Principles".
V. CONSIDER USE OF UTILITY FUND RESERVES FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE
STATION 17 GROUND STORAGE TANK ROOF
Staff will facilitate a discussion of funding options for roof replacement at Reservoir 17
including deferral of water main replacement projects and utilization of existing
water/sewer enterprise fund balance.
VI. MANAGER'S REPORT
Status
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 1 of 15
NOTE: ANY INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND THIS MEETING BUT BECAUSE OFA
DISABILITY NEEDS SOME ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE, SHOULD CONTACT THE
VILLAGE MANAGERS OFFICE AT 50 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056,
847/392-6000, EXTENSION 5327
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 2 of 15
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TYPE: SUBMITTED BY:
Minutes Doreen Jarosz
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT: DATE:
Village Manager's Office February 16, 2016
SUPPORTS THE FOLLOWING STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS:
BACKGROUND:
MOTION REQUIRED:
MANAGER'S MEMORANDUM:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
Committee of the
D Whole Minutes Cover Memo
January 26, 2016
Upload Date File Name
2/18/2016 1-26-2016 COW Minutes.docx
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 3 of 15
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES
January 26, 2016
CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:04 p.m. in the Village Board Room of the Village
Hall, 50 South Emerson Street, by Mayor Arlene Juracek. Trustees present included
Paul Hoefert, John Matuszak, Steven Polit, Richard Rogers and Colleen Saccotelli.
Trustee Michael Zadel was absent. Staff present included Village Manager
Michael Cassady, Assistant Village Manager David Strahl, Administrative Analyst
Alex Bertolucci, Community Development Director Bill Cooney, Police Chief Tim
Janowick, Interim Fire Chief Brian Lambel, Finance Director Dave Erb, and
Human Services Director Julie Kane.
II. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES FOR January 12, 2016
Motion made by Trustee Polit seconded by Trustee Rogers to approve the
minutes, minutes were approved.
III. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
Louis Goodman, 310 N. School St. spoke. He inquired as to whether the Mayor
would consider a state of the village address on an annual basis. Mayor Juracek
stated she would consider it; however, she currently does a presentation at the
economic development breakfast in January that typically covers all the topics
that would be considered in a state of the village address.
IV. FINANCIAL INCENTIVES TO DRIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION:
Village Manager Cassady provided an overview of the economic development
programs the village has used in the past and has requested Community
Development Director Bill Cooney provide an outline of the best practices used
by other communities.
Community Development Director Cooney stated there were several items
regarding economic development highlighted during the strategic planning
meetings including a review of what other communities used for economic
development incentive packages. He stated the majority of the surrounding
communities use the same tools the village uses. He also stated that none of the
techniques have proven to be ultra -successful and he has further talked with the
EDC which confirmed general acceptance of the techniques as incentives to be
considered on a case-by-case basis. He stated currently there is a less than 6%
vacancy rate in KBC or 9% vacancy rate of industrial property within the
community. He stated the best incentives appear to be the ones that are simple
and easy to utilize. He stated the village has utilized $25 million for
Committee of the Whole Page 1 of 3 02/12/16
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 4 of 15
redevelopment in the TIF area. He stated that the towns have used more TIFs for
redevelopment purposes and reminded the board that other taxing bodies are not
generally supportive of TIFs. He stated the village has used the 6B classification
extensively but have not had the opportunity to use the class 7 incentives since
they are typically related to more stringent requirements for qualification
purposes.
He stated that no communities surveyed use property tax abatements due to the
small amount of property taxes under the control of the municipality. He stated
that some communities including Mount Prospect have used a business
improvement District which can be overlaid in an area in which sales -tax rebates
can be utilized by sales -tax generating properties. He stated the use of special
service areas is limited due to the potential for disqualification of an SSA through
residential petitions. The use of industrial revenue bonds has not been very
attractive due to the low interest rates.
He stated the village has used a business improvement District for the Randhurst
Village redevelopment, a sales -tax abatement for Costco, and a sales -tax
abatement for the Northwest Electric relocation. He stated the village has also
approved twenty 6B designations.
General comments village board included the following items:
• There was a question regarding whether the village should focus on a
specific brand of business type.
• There was also an inquiry whether it would be prudent for staff to remind
potential businesses that the village is open to 6B classifications in the
early stages of the recruitment process.
• There was a discussion regarding the direct financial assistance option for
specific type of business but there were concerns regarding the possibility
of alienating other types of businesses. It was thought that targeting one
specific business type with a unique package may be too limiting.
• A comment was made that it appears as if staff has the appropriate tools
to move forward to avoid any direct incentive giveaways and the fact that
the village uses the same tools as other communities is helpful. The next
step might be to consider building code relief through modifications, sign
code relief, or modification to other redevelopment code options that may
be a detriment to redevelopment consideration.
V. DISCUSSION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT STRATEGIC PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION AND LEADERS GUIDE
Village Manager Cassady presented the plan showing the strategic plan
implementation steps projecting out to 2030. He stated staff is ready to follow the
goals as outlined in the execution process over the next several years. He also
highlighted the vision, mission, core beliefs and a plan for what the community
should look like in 2021. He highlighted each of the major goals: infrastructure
Committee of the Whole Page 2 of 3 02/12/16
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 5 of 15
with six action items; development with four action items; business with three
action items; commercial business district with seven action items; governance
with seven action items; and cultural climate with two action items.
General comments from the village board included the following items:
It was stated the strategic implementation plan is a living and breathing
document and can be utilized by staff as a guidance tool over the next several
years for prioritizing efforts to address policy needs of the Village Board.
General consensus of the Village Board was to support the plan and bring it for
formal approval at the next regular Village Board meeting.
VI. MANAGER'S REPORT
None
VII. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
None
IX. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:39 p.m.
DAVID STRAHL
Assistant Village Manager
Committee of the Whole Page 3 of 3 02/12/16
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 6 of 15
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TYPE: SUBMITTED BY:
Presentation Bill Cooney
DEPARTMENT: DATE:
Community Development 2/17/16
SUBJECT:
The Chamberof Commerce and Downtown Merchants Association will present their recentlyadopted
"Downtown Redevelopment Principles".
SUPPORTS THE FOLLOWING STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS:
DEVELOPMENT: Balancing preservation, revitalization, growth, BUSINESS: Strong local economy, support
for innovation, entrepreneurialism and small business, COMMERCIAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS: Vibrant
downtown and commercial areas
BACKGROUND:
The Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Merchants Association have requested the opportunityto appear
before the Village Board to present their "Downtown Redevelopment Principles" that they recently adopted.
The leadership of both groups will attend the 2/23/16 Committee of the Whole meeting to detail 5 key
guiding principles that theywould like the Village to consider as the next phases of downtown redevelopment
move forward. The Principles are:
Retail follows residential -A downtown business district cannot attract high-quality business until it has a
mass of residents to support the businesses. Unlike a commercial corridor which relies on traffic numbers
and easy in/out access for its customers, downtown districts need local residents to provide that customer
base (the more, the merrier).
2. Retail spaces should primarily be occupied by retail/destination businesses - Non -retail
businesses do little to create the all-important foot traffic every downtown needs. Restaurants and drinking
establishments are best at creating this foot traffic. Incentives or disincentives from the village may be a way
to lead building owners in that direction. We believe TIF funds could be used in this way.
3. If you have limited real estate, going up is a cost-effective option -As the Lakota Group pointed out
in its Downtown Study, in order to achieve the desired density, going up not only makes financial sense, it
provides the number of residential units necessary to sustain the downtown businesses and resulting
"activity" we all say that we want. If acquiring new downtown real estate is not a viable option, then going up
makes tremendous sense.
4. Larger contiguous parcels attract more attention in the commercial marketplace - Using the Small
Triangle as an example, offering small pieces of land for redevelopment among other small, future
development sites inherently leads to hodgepodge development that ultimately leaves the "highest and best
use" component out of the planning process. The municipality should be collecting and packaging contiguous
sites on paper if buying parcel outright is not an option. The municipality has the staff, means and desire to do
much of the investigation/matchmaking work.
5. The Municipality needs to take the leadership role in the downtown redevelopment - The
community we live in belongs to the collective residents of the community itself. The community administration
should strive to create that community. Allowing outside developers and large commercial entities to create
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 7 of 15
the landscape of our community is not serving the best interests of the community. Municipalities can provide
both incentives and disincentives to accomplish what it wants. It begins with a clear vision of what is wanted.
We encourage strong oversight and even the occasional "Special Purpose Ordinance" to accomplish the
vision of the community.
02/09/2016
MOTION REQUIRED:
Discretion of the Committee.
MANAGER'S MEMORANDUM:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type Upload Date File Name
Memo from Chamber-
s Chamber/DMA Backup Material 2/17/2016 DMA _ Downtown _Redevelopment _Principles _-
_021216. pdf
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 8 of 15
1
TO: Doreen C. Jarosz, Administrative Assistant to the Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
FROM: Dawn Fletcher Collins, Executive Director
Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce
SUBJECT: COW Meeting Agenda — February 23, 2016
DATE: February 12, 2016
On behalf of Board members of the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce and the
Mount Prospect Downtown Merchants Association, I respectfully request the attached
letter be forwarded to the Village Board of Trustees with an opportunity to present
remarks at the next Committee of the Whole Meeting on Tuesday, February 23.
Chad Busse, MPDMA President and Marcin Bos, MPCC Chairman will be in attendance
along with additional members of the business community.
Thank you for your consideration.
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 9 of 15
MPDMA & MPCC Downtown Redevelopment Principles
1. Retail follows residential - A downtown business district cannot attract high-quality
business until it has a mass of residents to support the businesses. Unlike a commercial
corridor which relies on traffic numbers and easy in/out access for its
customers, downtown districts need local residents to provide that customer base (the
more, the merrier).
2. Retail spaces should primarily be occupied by retail/ destination businesses -
Non -retail businesses do little to create the all-important foot traffic
every downtown needs. Restaurants and drinking establishments are best at creating this
foot traffic. Incentives or disincentives from the village may be a way to lead building
owners in that direction. We believe TIF funds could be used in this way.
3. If you have limited real estate, going up is a cost-effective option - As the Lakota
Group pointed out in its Downtown Study, in order to achieve the desired density, going
up not only makes financial sense, it provides the number of residential units necessary to
sustain the downtown businesses and resulting "activity" we all say that we want. If
acquiring new downtown real estate is not a viable option, then going up makes
tremendous sense.
4. Larger contiguous parcels attract more attention in the commercial marketplace -
Using the Small Triangle as an example, offering small pieces of land for redevelopment
among other small, future development sites inherently leads to hodgepodge development
that ultimately leaves the "highest and best use" component out of the planning process.
The municipality should be collecting and packaging contiguous sites on paper if buying
parcel outright is not an option. The municipality has the staff, means and desire to do
much of the investigation/matchmaking work.
5. The Municipality needs to take the leadership role in
the downtown redevelopment - The community we live in belongs to the collective
residents of the community itself. The community administration should strive to create
that community. Allowing outside developers and large commercial entities to create the
landscape of our community is not serving the best interests of the community.
Municipalities can provide both incentives and disincentives to accomplish what it wants.
It begins with a clear vision of what is wanted. We encourage strong oversight and even
the occasional "Special Purpose Ordinance" to accomplish the vision of the community.
02/09/2016
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 10 of 15
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TYPE: SUBMITTED BY:
Informational Sean P. Dorset/
DEPARTMENT: DATE:
PW-Water/Sewer February 17, 2016
SUBJECT:
Staff will facilitate a discussion of funding options for roof replacement at Reservoir 17 including deferral of
water main replacement projects and utilization of existing water/sewer enterprise fund balance.
SUPPORTS THE FOLLOWING STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS:
INFRASTRUCTURE: Well designed, well maintained public spaces and facilities, GOVERNANCE: Financial
sound, providing exceptional service
BACKGROUND:
On February 2, 2016, the Village Board awarded a contract to replace a failed roof covering the 2 million
gallon, welded -steel, ground -level water storage tank adjacent to Booster Pumping Station 17. Booster
Pumping Station 17 is on Elmhurst Road near the intersection of Camp McDonald Road.
Rehabilitation of this tank was scheduled for the 2016 fiscal year. However, the budgeted scope of work was
limited to minor structural repairs, safety enhancements, and coating replacement. Complete replacement of
the roof was not anticipated.
The roof replacement contract awarded by the Village Board was in the not -to -exceed amount of
$1,562,167. However, only $650,000 was allocated for tank rehabilitation work in the 2016 budget; creating
a $912,167 funding deficit.
Staff has suggested that this gap could be narrowed by deferring proposed water main replacement work
already included in the 2016 budget. $600,000 has been allocated for this purpose. These funds, combined
with the $650,000 already budgeted for Booster Station 17 reservoir rehabilitation work, would increase
available money to $1,250,000 and reduce the funding deficit for this project to $312,167.
During deliberation of this matter, the Village Board asked staff to identify the inventory of water main
replacement work awaiting funding so that deferral of this year's project could be considered with
appropriate perspective.
AttachmentA contains a listing of pending water main replacement projects. This list is prioritized according
to a weighted index that considers several parameters including number of water main breaks, water main
age, water main material, water main capacity, type of customers, critical risk priority, isolation valving, water
main purpose, and system continuity.
This listing ranks projects from category 5 (highest priority) to category 1 (lowest priority). Pipe segments not
included on this list, the vast majorityof the water distribution system, are not slated for replacement.
Water main projects ranked as either category 4 or category 5 are considered priorities for funding. Pipe
segments rated category 3 or lower are slated for continued monitoring. This analysis is reiterated on an
annual basis and is subject to change.
Attachment B contains an engineer's estimate of probable construction cost for category 4 and category 5
projects. The total current backlog of priority water main replacement work is approximately $17,000,000.
Total estimated reserves in the Water and Sewer Fund as of December 31, 2015 are $4,443,507. This
represents a reserve balance as a percent of operating expenditures of 34.4%.
The fund balance policy of the village sets the benchmark reserve level for this fund at 25.0%, or $3,229,996.
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 11 of 15
Excess reserves above the benchmark are $1,213,511.
If the village were to fund the entire gap amount ($912,167) with reserves, the reserve balance remains above
the benchmark at $3,531,340, or 27.3%. Utilizing this option would allow scheduled water main replacement
work to continue and maintain compliance with the village's fund balance policy.
MOTION REQUIRED:
1. Motion to recommend use of Utility Fund reserves to repair the Station 17 roof structure.
2. Discretion of the Committee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the use of Utility Fund reserves to fund the
roof replacement. This is an appropriate source of funds to appropriate for this critical repair. This approach
will allow continued progress on replacement of Category4 and 5 watermain and we will stay in compliance
with the Village Fund Balance Policy.
MANAGER'S MEMORANDUM:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description Type
D Attachment B _ Cover Memo
EOPCC
Attachment A
D Water Main Cover Memo
Projects
Upload Date File Name
2/17/2016 Attachment B_EOPCC_CATS_4_5.pdf
2/17/2016 Attachment A Water Mai n_Repl_Projects.docx
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 12 of 15
Water Main Replacement Cost Estimate
Mount Prospect, It
1/13/2016
Item Name
Unit
Quantity Unit
William St
Cost (Henry/Central);
OwenSt
(Lonnquist/Golf)
Louis St !
(Council/end)
Connie Ln
(Audrey/Hetlen)
Whifegate Dr (We
Go/Cathy)
Elm St
{Highland/Gregor/)
- Elm St
, (Thayer/Central) ",
Elmhurst Rd (Golf
Plaza II Shopping '
Center) ,
Prospect AVe & RR
Grossing
(William/Edward)
Water Main - 6" Diameter
Foot
0
$ 135
Water Main - 8" Diameter
Foot
20,374
S 170
658
1,398
1,266
609
756
1,255
1,321
1,037
1,006
Water Main - 10" Diameter
Foot
0
$ 195
Water Main - 12" Diameter
Foot
0
$ 225
Water Main - 16" Diameter
Foot
0
$ 280
Water Main - 18" Diameter
Foot
1,683
S 320
Water Main - 24" Diameter
Foot
1,953
S 430
Water Main Valves in Vaults
Each
35
S 9,100
2
5
4
2
3
4
4
3
3
Water Service Connections 2
Each
282
S 3,400
18
37
34
16
20
33
35
28
27
Fire Hydrants and Leads 3
Each
35
S 6,400
2
5
4
2
3
4
4
3
3
Excavation & Trenching
Cy
10,959
S 11
682
1,450
1,313
632
784
1,301
1,370
1,075
1,043
Trench Backfill4
CY
10,177
S 43
634
1,346
1,219
586
728
1,209
1,272
999
969
Pavement Removal & Patching
$Y
9,394
S 125
585
1,243
1,125
541
672
1,116
1,174
922
894
Restoration
SY
14,091
S 10
877
1,864
1,688
812
1,008
1,673
1,761
1,383
1,341
Subtotal
S 313,379
S 665,810
S
602,944
S 290,042
S 360,052
S
597,705
S
629,138
S 493,881
S 479,117
Contingencies (20%)
S 62,676
S 133,162
S
120,589
S 58,008
S 72,010
S
119,541
S
125,828
S 98,776
S 95,823
Engineering &Administration (20%)
S 62,676
S 133,162
S
120,589
S 58,008
S 72,010
S
119,541
S
125,828
S 98,776
S 95,823
EOPCC (rounded)
$ 439,000
$ 932,000
$
844,000
$ 406,000
$ 504,000
$
837,000
$
881,000
$ 691,000
$ 671,000
Notes:
1 Two (2) valves in vaults for every 600 feet have been included to connect to existing water main.
2 Sixteen (16) water service connections have been included for every 600 feet of water main.
3 One (1) fire hydrant has been included for every 300 feet of water main.
4 Select granular backfill has been included, anticipating that all water main is located under a street.
5 Pavement patching for one 8 -foot wide bituminous traffic lane has been included.
Segments ranked at 5
0: Segments ranked at 4
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 13 of 15
George St
(Council%Loniigt(stj
Deneen Ln
,{Small/Thaye,) ;(Council/end)
Albert St
William St
(Prospect/Sharbonee)
Busse Rd
(Magnolia/Dempster)
I Oka Ave
(Lonnquist/Golf)
Owen St
(Gregory/Thayer)
Maple St
(Lincoln/Council)
Kenilworth Ave
(Prospect/Central)
Small Ln
(Deneen/Stevenson)
Waverly Ave
(Lonnquist/Golf)
Prospect Ave
(Maple/School)
Total
1,262
623
1,266
744
1,624
1,373
1,368
311
1,614
883
20,374
1,683
1,683
1,953
1,953
4
2
4
2
7
5
5
5
6
1
5
3
80
34
17
34
20
52
43
37
36
45
8
43
24
640
4
2
4
2
7
5
5
5
6
1
5
3
80
1,309
646
1,313
772
2,025
1,684
1,424
1,419
1,745
323
1,674
916
24,899
1,215
600
1,219
716
1,881
1,564
1,322
1,317
1,621
299
1,554
850
23,121
1,122
554
1,125
661
1,736
1,444
1,220
1,216
1,496
276
1,435
785
21,342
1,683
831
1,688
992
2,604
2,165
1,831
1,824
2,244
415
2,152
1,177
32,013
S 601,039
S 296,710
S
602,944
S
354,337
S
1,437,914
S
773,445
S 653,904
S
651,523
S 1,053,994
S
148,117
S
768,682
S
420,537
S 12,195,215
S 120,208
S 59,342
S
120,589
S
70,867
S
287,583
S
154,689
S 130,781
S
130,305
S 210,799
S
29,623
S
153,736
S
84,107
S 2,439,043
S 120,208
S 59,342
S
120,589
S
70,867
S
287,583
S
154,689
S 130,781
S
130,305
S 210,799
S
29,623
S
153,736
S
84,107
S 2,439,043
$ 841,000
$ 415,000
$
844,000
$
496,000
$
2,013,000
$
1,083,000
$ 915,000
$
912,000
$ 1,476,000
$
207,000
$
1,076,000
$
589,000
$ 17,072,000
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 14 of 15
Attachment A
Water Main Replacement Projects
William St Hen /Central
5
Owen St Lonn uist/Golf
5
Louis St Council /end
5
Connie Ln (Audrey/Hatlen)
5
White ate Dr WeGo/Cath
5
Elm St (Highland/Gregory)
5
Elm St (Thayer/Central
5
Elmhurst Rd Golf Plaza II
5
Prospect Ave & RR Crossing (William/Edward)
5
George St Council/Lonn uist
5
Deneen Ln(Small/Thayer)
5
Albert St Council/end
4
William St Pros ect/Shabonee
4
Busse Rd (Magnolia/Dempster)
4
1 Oka Ave Lonn uist/Golf
4
Owen St (Gregory/Thayer)
4
Maple St Lincoln/Council
4
Kenilworth Ave (Prospect/Central
4
Small Ln Deneen/Stevenson
4
Waverly Ave Lonn uist/Golf
4
Prospect Ave (Maple/School
4
Elmhurst Ave (Evergreen/Lincoln
3
School St (Thayer/Central
3
Northwest H Albert/Mount Prospect Road
3
Kim Ave Crestwood/Hatlen
3
William St Council/Lonn uist
3
Owen St (Thayer/Central
3
William St Lonn uist/Golf
3
School St (Gregory/Thayer)
3
Birch Dr (Catalpa/Cottonwood
3
Redwood Dr Robert/Cottonwood
3
Elm St (Gregory/Isabella)
3
Northwest H Fairview/Wi11e
3
Maple St (Highland/Gregory)
3
Prospect Manor Ave (Kensington/Highland)
3
Lincoln St(Busse/Bobby)
3
Maple St Lonn uist/Golf
3
Stratton Ln(Lowden/Thayer)
2
Fern Dr Willow/Cottonwood
2
Main St (Highland/Central
2
White ate Dr Cath /Central
2
Hiawatha Trl Emerson/Lonn uist
2
Thornwood Ln Tamarack/Laver ne
2
WeGo Trl Lonn uist/Golf
2
Lancaster Ave Lonn uist/Golf
2
Oak Av (Gregory/Isabella)
2
Catalpa Ln Tamarack/Busse
2
Martha Ln Crestwood/Hatlen
2
Highland St Wille/Emerson
2
Elmhurst Rd Kensin ton/Hi ghl and
2
School St Lonn uist/Golf
1
Elmhurst Rd Sunset/Golf
1
Emerson St Central/Northwest H
1
HenrySt Kenilworth/end
1
-=Village of Mount Prospect I February 17, 2016
Committe of the Whole Meeting - February 23, 2016 Page 15 of 15