Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12/09/1996 SC MinutesDirector Chairman Water/Sewer Superintendent Glen R. Andler MAINTAIN Roderick O'Donovan Deputy Director Commissioner Streets/Buildings Superintendent Sean P. Dorsey Commissioner Paul Bures Village Engineer �I Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Jeffrey A. Wulbecker „6 , _ Sandra M. Clark Administrative Aide 0 Q Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent Dawn L. Wucki4 James E. Guenther Solid Waste Coordinator V, Qe M. Lisa Angell Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229 Phone B47/B70-5640 Fax 647/256-9377 TDD 647/692-1265 MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION I. CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, December 9, 1996. II. ROLL CALL Upon roll call, each Safety Commission Member introduced themselves to the audience. Present upon roll call: Lee Beening Chairman Andy Mitchell Commissioner Chuck Bencic Commissioner Nancy Bobikewicz Commissioner (Joined the discussion after item VLD) Joan Bjork Commissioner Paul Bures Public Works George Steiner Police Department Buz Livingston Fire Department Sean Won Public Works, Engineering Division Absent: Phyllis Moliere Commissioner Others in Attendance: See Attached List. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Chuck Bencic, moved to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Safety Commission held on October 14, 1996. The Minutes were approved by a vote of 7-0. IV. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD No citizens came forth at this time to discuss any topics that were not on the current agenda. 1 V. OLD BUSINESS A) 3 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST at MARINA ST & COUNCIL TR a) Response from the City of Des Plaines This item was discussed at the October 1996 Safety Commission Meeting. The item was deferred until a response was received from the City of Des Plaines concerning a speed limit reduction on Marina Street within the City of Des Plaines. The Village Traffic Engineer sent a letter (attached) to the City of Des Plaines requesting that the speed limit of Marina Street be reduced from 30 mph to 20/25 mph on October 17, 1996 as instructed by the Safety Commission. The City of Des Plaines sent a response (attached) to the Village on November 25, 1996. According to this response, the City of Des Plaines states: 1. The posted speed limit of 30 mph is appropriate for Marina street. Therefore, the City of Des Plaines believes the 30 mph speed limit is a safe and reasonable speed limit. 2. To artificially lower the speed limit would only result in additional speed limit violations rather than control vehicles to a reasonable speed. b) Background Information from the October 1996 Safety Commission Meeting 1. Resident Observations: 1) Speeding at this intersection 2) High amount of cut through traffic 3) There are many little children living around this intersection. 2. Staff Observations: The Engineering Staff performed a stop sign study. The findings are as follows: 1) Special Condition/Speeding Problem. As shown on the attached map, two legs of this 3 -way intersection is within the Village of Mount Prospect. The third leg of the intersection is within the City of Des Plaines. Currently, there is one stop sign on eastbound Council Trail at Marina Street. Due to resident's complaint about speeding on Marina Street, the City of Des Plaines performed a speed and a volume study between July 25 and July 26, 1996. The 85th percentile speeds of Marina Street were 29.4 mph for the northbound traffic and 22.7 mph for the southbound traffic. Based on the speed and 04 volume, the City of Des Plaines decided not to lower the speed limit (30 mph) of Marina Street. It is projected that the 85th percentile speed for Council Trail is the same as that of Marina Street. Therefore, random speeding does occur on Council Trail. Note that the posted speed limit of Council Trail is 20 mph. 2) Accidents Mt. Prospect Side Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 No. of 0 0 0 0 0 accident Des Plaines Side Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 No. of 1 2 1 1 1 accident The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant (minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi -Way Stop Warrants. 3) Traffic Volume The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant is 500 vehicles/hour for eight hour periods (500 x 8 = 4000 cars/8 hrs). The traffic volume at this intersection (759 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 19% of the stop sign warrant. 4) Sight Obstruction A number of parkway trees are located at the intersection. However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction problems. 5) Survey Results A total of 25 surveys were sent out in August, 1996 to collect and analyze the residents' opinions. 20 surveys were returned to the Village. 19 residents favored and 1 resident was against the 3 -way stop sign at Marina Street and Council Trail. 3 C) Discussion Sean Won summarized the response from the City of Des Plaines as follows: 1. The posted speed limit of 30 mph is appropriate for Marina street. Therefore, the City of Des Plaines believes the 30 mph speed limit is a safe and reasonable speed limit. 2. To artificially lower the speed limit would only result in additional speed limit violations rather than control vehicles to a reasonable speed. Mr. Peter Gilbertson of 621 South Albert St, Ms. Sara Yarbrough of 605 South Albert St and Mr. & Mrs. Hajduk of 513 South Albert St said the following: 1. This intersection does not meet the stop sign warrants and the City of Des Plaines does not want to install a stop sign on Marina St at Council Tr. The City of Des Plaines will not reduce the speed limit on Marina St from 30 mph to 20/25 mph. 2. They asked all commissioners if the Village can do anything for them to resolve the speeding and the cut through traffic problem if a stop sign can not be installed on Marina St at Council Tr and the speed limit on Marina St can not be reduced. Chairman Lee Beening said that commissioners' hands are tied on this request. 3. Mrs. Hajduk asked to the Safety Commission why Marina St south of Council Tr is not within the Village of Mount Prospect (Chairman Beening said that he does not know why that Marina St is not within the Village of Mount Prospect). Chairman Lee Beening said that Marina St south of Council Tr is under the jurisdiction of the City of Des Plaines. Chairman Beening also stated that two cars passed him when he was driving 20 mph on Council Tr and that what the City of Des Plaines said could be right. Chairman Lee Beening, seconded by Commissioner Andy Mitchell, moved to approve the following recommendation: Install LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY and CAUTION CHILDREN PLAY SIGNS near the existing 20 mph speed limit sign on Council Tr for westbound traffic. The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. VI. NEW BUSINESS A) SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REQUEST from 30 mph to 25 mph on BUSSE AVE between WE -GO TR and MAIN ST a) Background Information Resident & Staff Comments: Due to speeding on Busse Ave, the Safety Commission instructed the Village Traffic Engineer to investigate the possibility of reducing the speed limit of the entire length of Busse Ave from 30 mph to 25 mph. Note: the speed limit of Busse Ave between Weller Ln and We -Go Trail is 20 mph and the speed limit of Busse Ave between Main Street and Mt. Prospect Rd is 25 mph. Therefore, the speed limit of Busse Ave between We -Go Trail and Main Street needs to be reduced from 30 mph to 25 mph. A speed survey of cars on Busse Ave was performed in September, 1996. The 85th percentile speed was between 30 - 33 mph which indicates the occurrence of random speeding. A total of 60 surveys were sent out in October, 1996 to collect and analyze the residents' opinions. 43 surveys were returned to the Village. 39 residents favored and 4 residents were against the proposed speed limit change. All residents on Busse Ave between We -Go Tr and Main St were informed about the December Safety Commission Meeting schedule. Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended: Lower the speed limit on Busse Ave between We -Go Trail and Main Street from: 30 mph to: 25 mph b) Discussion Commissioner Andy Mitchell said that the Safety Commission already approved the speed limit change on Busse Ave. Chairman Lee Beening explained that this request was not previously discussed and that the Safety Commission instructed the Village Traffic Engineer to process the speed limit reduction because the survey needs to be done per the Notification Policy. Sean Won said that the survey was done per the Notification Policy Commissioner Chuck Bencic, seconded by Paul Bures, moved to approve the change recommended by the Engineering Staff. The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. 5 B) REMOVAL of PARKING RESTRICTIONIONE-WAY STREET DESIGNATION/TURN RESTRICTION on WELLER LN between BUSSE AVE and CLEVEN AVE a) Background Information Resident & Staff Comments: Weller Lane is no longer used by Westbrook School parents to pick up and drop off students due to a change in the use of Westbrook School. All elementary school children have moved to the new Lions School. Presently Westbrook School is used as a special education school. Therefore, Parking Restrictions/One-Way Street Designation/Turn Restriction on Weller Ln between Busse Ave & Cleven Ave are not needed. The special education school that is using Westbrook School has confirmed that they are not using Weller Lane for pick-up and drop-off operations. A total of 18 surveys were sent out in October, 1996 to collect and analyze the residents' opinions. 10 surveys were returned to the Village. All 10 returned surveys favored the proposed changes. All residents along Weller Ln between Busse Ave and Cleven Ave were informed about the December Safety Commission Meeting schedule. Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended the following: Remove 1. One Way Street Designation Southbound between Busse Ave and Cleven Ave during school hours 2. No -Right -Turn from Cleven Ave onto Weller Lane during school hours 3. No Parking during school hours for the Eastside of Weller Ln between Busse Ave and Cleven Ave 4. No Parking Pick -Up Zone for the Westside of Weller Ln between a point 600 ft and 800 ft south of Central Rd b) Discussion Chairman Lee Beening said that Westbrook School is being used as a special education school. Therefore, Parking Restrictions/One-Way Restriction/Turn Restriction on Weller Ln between Busse Ave & Cleven Ave are not needed. Chairman Beening asked Sean Won whether the existing DO -NOT -ENTER sign has been removed. Sean Won said that the DO -NOT -ENTER sign will be removed since Weller Ln will not be a one-way street if the recommended change is approved. R Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Joan Bjork, moved to approve the change recommended by the Engineering Staff. The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. C) PARKING RESTRICTION on THE EASTSIDE of ELMHURST AVE between POST OFFICE MAIL DROP BOX DRIVEWAYS a) Background Information 1. Mount Prospect Post Office Observations: No parking on the eastside of Elmhurst Avenue between Post Office Mail Drop Box Driveways to provide an unobstructed view to the drivers. 2. Staff Observations: This parking restriction affects only two businesses. One is the Mount Prospect Post Office which requested the restriction. The other is Friedrichs Funeral Home. A survey to Friedrichs Funeral Home was sent out on November 8, 1996. No response was received. No Parking on Elmhurst Avenue as requested by the Post Office will improve the safety of drivers who are using the Mail Drop Box and drivers on Elmhurst Ave. Only 3 parking spaces will be eliminated. However cars can park north of the north post office driveway which is also a 2 hour parking zone. Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended the following change: From 2 Hour Parking Limit To No Parking Any Time on the Eastside of Elmhurst Avenue from Central Road to 180 ft north of Central Road b) Discussion Chairman Lee Beening said that two full-size vans were parked between the Post Office Mail Drop Box Driveways when he checked a few days ago. These two vans obstructed the view for drivers using the Post Office Mail Drop Box Driveways. Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Joan Bjork, moved to approve the change recommended by the Engineering Staff. The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. 7 D) YIELD SIGN REQUEST on STRATFORD PL at MEADOW LN & WEDGEWOOD LN a) Background Information 1. Resident Observations: Cars are making turns at these corners without slowing down. 2. Staff Observations: The Engineering Staff sent out surveys per the Notification Policy to residents within 250 ft within two intersections to collect their opinions and notified all affected residents about the December Safety Commission Meeting schedule. The Engineering Staff performed a speed survey in August 1996. The 85th percentile speeds on Meadow Ln and Wedgewood Ln were between 25 mph to 33 mph which indicates the occurrence of random speeding. A total of 29 surveys were sent out in October, 1996 to collect and analyze the residents' opinions. 18 surveys were returned to the Village. 14 residents favored and 4 residents were against the proposed changes. The number of accidents at the intersections are as follows: Meadow Ln & Stratford PI: No Accidents for the last 5 years Wedgewood Ln & Stratford PI: One Accident in 1993 for the last 5 years A significant factor to consider is that the pavement width of the street is only 18' wide and the street does not have sidewalks. It is common for pedestrians to walk on the edge of the roadway. Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended: Install Yield Signs on Stratford Place at Meadow Ln & on Stratford Place at Wedgewood Ln b) Discussion Chairman Lee Beening said the following: 1. Meadow Ln, Stratford PI and Wedgewood Ln do not have sidewalks. 2. The pavement width of three streets is narrow (only 18'). Commissioner Joan Bjork, seconded by Commissioner Andy Mitchell, moved to approve the change requested by the Engineering Staff. The motion was approved by a vote of 7-0. Commissioner Nancy Bobikewicz joined the Safety Commission Meeting at this time. E) VARIATION REQUEST to ALLOW BERM and SHRUBS on PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (1425 BURNING BUSH LN) a) Background Information Resident Observations: 1) Mr. W. Richardson of 1425 Burning Bush Ln was not aware of the shrub and berm restriction on public right-of-way (He was aware of the 3 ft height restriction). 2) Neighbor has a berm on public right-of-way 3) He installed this berm and shrubs to prevent any damage to his yard from cars, snow plows and bicycles. 4) He already spent $1200 to install this berm and shrubs. If he has to relocate, it would cost about the same amount. He feels that he does not have a place on his property for this quantity of top soil and shrubs. 2. Staff Observations: This berm is located within Public Right -Of -Way contrary to the Village Ordinance Section 9.302. The shrubs are located within Public Right - Of -Way contrary to the Village Ordinance Section 9.501. These two ordinances were adopted on December 1, 1992. The berm was installed sometime after November, 1994. The height of the shrubs is currently approximately 3 ft above the pavement. The effect of this berm on drainage is insignificant. This berm does not interfere with existing public utilities maintenance. b) Discussion Chairman Lee Beening said the following: 1. The Village Ordinances 9.302 and 9.501 were adopted on December 1, 1992. The Village Ordinance 9.117 adopted the grandfather clause that allows for certain existing plantings and berms to be retained on public property per the procedure explained in the Ordinance 9.117. A property owner that has existing plantings and berms on public property can appeal to the Village Safety Commission per the Village Ordinance 9.117. But any new berms or evergreens or shrubs on public property are not allowed after December 1, 1992. 2. Because new berms or shrubs are not allowed on public property, Mr. W. Richardson of 1425 Burning Bush Lane & Public Works Department are working on relocating the existing berm and shrubs on Mr. Richardson's property. Therefore, this request is removed from the agenda. d F) STOP SIGN RELOCATION REQUEST from WHEELING RD at ELDERBERRY LN to WHEELING RD at THE 500 BLOCK DOGWOOD LN a) Background Information 1. Resident Observations: 1) It is difficult and dangerous to make a left turn out of the 500 block Dogwood Ln onto Wheeling Rd due to the volume and the speed of traffic. 2) Witnessed several near collisions. 2. Staff Observations: The Engineering Staff sent out surveys per the Notification Policy to residents within 250 ft of these two intersections to collect their opinions and notified all affected residents about the December Safety Commission Meeting schedule. The Engineering Staff performed a stop sign study and compared the two intersections for traffic volumes and number of accidents. The findings are as follows: 1) Accidents A search of the accident reports indicated: Wheeling Rd & Elderberry Ln Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 (up to Sep) No. of accident 0 1 0 1 0 Wheeling Rd•& Dogwood Ln Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996. (up to Sep) No. of accident 3 2 2 1 2 The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant (minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi -Way Stop Warrants at either intersection. But the total number of accidents for the last five years at Wheeling Rd & Dogwood Ln is 10 and five times the number of accidents (2 accidents for the last five years) at Wheeling Rd and Elderberry Ln. 10 2) Traffic Volume Traffic counts were performed in February, 1996. A comparison of the average daily traffic volume is as follows: Wheeling Rd: 7008 vpd (vehicle per day) Dogwood Ln: 2357 vpd Elderberry Ln: 187 vpd The number of cars on Dogwood Ln is more than 12 times the number of cars on Elderberry Ln. The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant is 500 vehicles/hour for eight hour periods (500 x 8 = 4000 cars/8 hrs). The traffic volume at Wheeling/Dogwood (2745 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 69% of the stop sign warrant. The traffic volume at Wheeling/Elderberry (2159 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 54% of the stop sign warrant. Both of the intersection do not meet the stop sign warrant. 3) Sight Obstruction A number of parkway trees are located at these intersections. However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction problems. 4) Survey Results A total of 45 surveys were sent out in June, 1996 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion. 15 surveys were returned to the Village. 5 residents favored and 10 residents were against the relocation . The intersection of Wheeling Road and Dogwood Ln has more accidents and more traffic than the intersection of Wheeling/Elderberry. Additionally, residents on Elderberry Ln have other available routes to access their residences. Residents on Boxwood Area do not have other routes except Dogwood/Boxwood. Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended: Relocation of Stop Signs from Wheeling Road at Elderberry Ln to Wheeling Road at the 500 Block Dogwood Ln. 11 b) Discussion Mr. Sheldon Tabas of 990 Wheeling Road said that several residents who represent approximately 450 town homes and apartments attended the December Safety Commission Meeting. Mr. Tabas, Mr. Jerry Johnson of 919 Boxwood Dr, Mr. John Phillips of 1019 Boxwood Dr. Robert A. Fox of 902B Boxwood Dr, Mr. Stan Daniel of 1058A Boxwood Dr and Mr. Mark Kare of 1286 Wheeling Rd said the following: 1. It is difficult and dangerous to make a left turn out of the 500 block Dogwood Ln onto Wheeling Rd due to the volume and the speed of traffic. 2. They witnessed several real accidents. 3. Due to the difference of traffic volumes, it makes sense for them to move stop signs from Wheeling Road at Elderberry Ln to Wheeling Road at the 500 Block Dogwood Ln. Ms. Mary Stembridge of 600 Greenwood Dr said the following: 1. Every driver who wants to avoid the Elmhurst Rd/Kensington Rd/Rand uses Wheeling Rd. 2. There is a speeding problem on Wheeling Road. 3. By moving stop signs, it could be dangerous for residents south of Elderberry Ln. 4. More stop signs should be installed on Wheeling Rd (Sean Won said /that she could send a letter to him requesting new stop signs. Then Sean Won will process that request). Chairman Lening said that stop signs do not slow down traffic. Chairman Beening suggested moving only one southbound stop sign, not the existing northbound stop sign. All six residents said that the real problem at the intersection is the northbound traffic which stops at Elderberry Ln and speed up passing the 500 Block Dogwood Ln. Therefore, this suggestion will not be considered. Chairman Lee Beening also pointed out that we are going to' lose 2 parking spaces by relocating stop signs. All six Boxwood Area residents said that losing 2 parking spaces is acceptable to them. Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Chuck Bencic, moved to approve the change recommended by the Engineering Staff: The motion was approved by a vote of 8-0. G) 4 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST at SCHOOL ST & THAYER ST a) Background Information 1. Resident Observations: 1) Witnessed several near collisions 12 2) Configuration of School Street (slight curve through the intersection) 3) Speeding at this intersection 4) Children riding their bicycles on Thayer Street. 2. Staff Observations: 1) Accidents There have been No Accidents at this intersection since 1992 The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant (minimum five accidents per year) for the Multi -Way Stop Warrants. 2) Speeding A representative speed survey was performed on Thayer Street west of School Street between Tuesday, October 8, 1996 and Thursday, October 10, 1996. The 85th percentile speed which are representative of this intersection were 30 - 31 mph while the speed limits of School St & Thayer St are 25 mph. 3) Traffic Volume The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant is 500 vehicles/hour for eight hour periods (500 x 8 = 4000 cars/8 hrs). The traffic volume at this intersection (443 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 11 % of the stop sign warrant. 4) Sight Obstruction A number of parkway trees are located at the intersection. However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction problems. 5) Survey Results A total of 23 surveys were sent out in October, 1996 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion. 16 surveys were returned to the Village. 11 residents favored and 5 resident were against the 4 -way stop sign at School Street and Thayer Street. The intersection of School Street and Thayer Street does not meet the multi -way stop sign warrants. Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommended: 4 -way stop signs at the intersection of School Street and Thayer Street should not be installed. 13 b) Discussion Sean Won summarized the stop sign study and said that this intersection does not meet the stop sign warrants. Mr. & Mrs. Penner of 203 North School Street said the following: 1. Many children use this intersection to get to Busse Park (one block from the intersection). 2. They asked Sean Won when the traffic counts were done (Sean Won said that the traffic count was done in October). 3. There is a speeding problem. 4. School Street is offset by approximately 20 ft. 5. They understand that this intersection does not meet the stop sign warrants. They requested new traffic counts be taken next summer (New traffic count will be done in June of 1997). Chairman Lee Beening asked what are the speed limits of School and Thayer Streets. Sean Won said that the speed limits of these two streets are 25 mph. Commissioner Andy Mitchell said that there are no 25 mph speed limit signs near the intersection. Sean Won said that he would check the intersection and install the 25 mph speed limit signs, if needed. Commissioner Andy Mitchell, seconded by Paul Bures, moved to deny 4 -way stop signs at School St and Thayer Street. The motion was approved by a vote of 8-0. The Engineering Staff will perform new traffic count in June of 1997 and bring this issue back to the Safety Commission. Chairman Lee Beening announced that Safety Commissioner Arlene Juracek submitted her resignation to the Mayor due to her recent appointment to fill out the term of Trustee Skowron on the Village Board. Sean Won extended the Village's appreciation and holiday greeting to the Safety Commission and presented each member with a gift. 14 VI. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 8-0 to adjourn at 9:10 P.M., upon the motion of Commissioner Andy Mitchell. Paul Bures seconded the motion. Respectfully submitted, Sean S.M. Won, P.E. Traffic Engineer 15 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING ATTENDANCE SHEET DECEMBER 9, 1996 NAME ADDRESS PHONE NO. � -� i2�� 1� t� �►. i�t�. ��i �i� t ass- H 3 PLEASE SIGN-UP AND PICKUP THE AGENDAI No c#rA#J6E SP�so 6��+ir a SPFAD P'OCoM r� h0 CHANb6 SPItD 0017 2t ftil)o cir/T c NA�v6�r 30 . pr4p sS SPR. • 'tel K CI�iCJI '7 C � Y r. O CIS � •= c 0 c�o� jo I c ` o c HAM C E - . sN:....,. 1 10 �11P 107 7 lot 1r _ 77-1 23 10 LRL 112 H 1 C5 I !C•3cI „< „3 REM1-4� . r-?' r-9 C J'j 17 I -,-,B-,-,B11 i s�=...i:r Courtt-1 19 120 LL RA�STRI(- t 1 21 1122 12, j �. .•I c� rj c �- � t�� -3 i -t � 1.•3 ! , S Ili 'S � 125 125 j , I I, 7 125 1•.g ��� j ;0 1- C I 122 131 \\N 123 3 ( ,2t I `.3 ,t+ � d �!c c I^ , 6 I _ j� 'LV T �^; c � ✓Y I '� T O 2C3 2C51 2C5 2C5 135 > I• -+r+ 1 2071 2CS 2C7 r..s. 2cs 210 2CS ! , 2, t 212 2' 1 ' I ; 2; 2 p 5 5 3C ; r'; ti _ ! ., 1 �G2 ! 2 7 2 7` .,5 t 3C7 a. M } !:; c l o' a c c c (212; 3'3 �Mi-i'• <J 315 r UNC:_H ST (Sid. 11'x` J VILLACE OF VOL'1T PROSPECT I S1RCE1 j.HD L CRESS uLP 100 SOUTH EVERSOV S';P.EET ELK CRCvE 'Cwb%SHIP (Sd• 11•L") MOL•ST PROSFEC'T. ILU»OIS w.1/2 N.w.1/A S.c.11-41-11 rvpuc WCQAS rMhalvc•11 L+L .'+.' •: tL.— n — I%L.I . 7b0' • rr.Lt._ .p . .. • r- L ...t : • 1 M u z LLJ U) J Lu PA P... 9 1 n) (> ��Sl'�l c 77 tAJ EXISTING BUILDING P 05T AFF ( ( 6 23 Si �---- i j 23 -------------;�10---------------- �,1. j {j•,�r�Tc}L �2 CoMMen o%q� pr fK j�Ps . CENTRAL ROA n w W n V) 1 A d?iN33 ONIddOHS isd(nHONdd ad 1sdnHwII N s as OE v 0 CNto J W N NI C0C,%', 00IIA Q 0 N U W C CL Z O V O N � - r- CL a d U 00 O N J N MEADOW LN EUCLID AVE b BOXWOOD DR NOR Tri CNE WAY OU 7) sE$ d °' / RELOCATING SOP SIGN FROM c 0 z EUCLID SCLOOL EXIS7NG S70P SIGNS t 12 vpd CEDAR LN i I M T © DOGWOOD LN 0 0 n H"cY �v 167 vpd ELDER=E'r.RY LN BOXWOOD DR SOUTH (ONE WAY IN) _ 0 Ix 2 � GREENWDOD DMZ ARY LN IRONWDDD DR