Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/11/1997 SC MinutesDirector Glen R. Andler Deputy Director Sean P Dorsey Village Engineer Jeffrey A. Wulbecker Administrative Aide Dawn L. Wucki Solid Waste Coordinator M. Lisa Angell Water/Sewer Superintendent Roderick T O'Donovan Streets/Buildings Superintendent Paul C. Bures Forestry/Grounds Superintendent Sandra M. Clark Vehicle/Equipment Superintendent James E. Guenther Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1 700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois B0056-2229 Phone B47/B70-5840 Fax 847/253-9377 TOO B47/392-1235 MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION I. CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:31 P.M. on Monday, August 11, 1997. II. ROLL CALL Upon roll call, each Safety Commission Member introduced themselves to the audience. Present upon roll call Others in Attendance: Lee Beening Joan Bjork Phyllis Moliere Paul Buries Ted Adamczyk Buz Livingston Chuck Bencic Nancy Bobikewicz Andy Mitchell Sean Won III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Chairman Commissioner Commissioner Public Works Police Department Fire Department Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Public Works, Engineering Division See Attached List. Commissioner Bjork, seconded by Commissioner Moliere, moved to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Safety Commission held on July 14, 1997 as submitted. The Minutes were approved by a vote of 9-0. IV. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Ms. Gloria Celler, 301 Autumn, said that some vehicles exiting Aldi driveway do not yield to vehicles on Harvest Ln. Mr. Celler requested that signs be installed to make this intersection safer for the east/west bound traffic on Harvest Ln 1 Mr. Steve Polet, 601 Wilshire, said that 1) there is a no -left -turn sign on Highland Ave at Rand Road for the eastbound traffic, 2) Highland Ave is not a continuous through street at Rand Road, 3) The east leg of Highland Ave is approximately 80' north of the west leg, 4) drivers on the west leg of Highland Ave who want to continue on the east leg of Highland Ave are making left turns at the intersection, even though the left turn is prohibited, and 5) these drivers claim that they are not making left turns. They claim that they are going straight. Mr. Polet said that a right turn only sign should be installed instead of the existing no left turn on Highland Ave at Rand Road. V. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to discuss. VI. NEW BUSINESS A) FIRE LANE AND DROP OFF LANE REQUEST BY ST. MARK CHURCH a) Background Information To celebrate their 50 years of service, St. Mark Lutheran Church decided to add an addition that would make their building more accessible to all. St. Mark Lutheran Church requested approval for the following two features of the proposed design: 1. On Street Drop Off Lane Request (see attached map) 2. Fire Lane Designation Request (see attached map) • Westside of Wille St (from Evergreen to 160' south of Evergreen) • Southside of Evergreen Ave (from Wille to 165' west of Wille) • Eastside of Pine St (from Evergreen to 100' south of Evergreen) Church Observations: Drop Off Lane The purpose of this drop off lane is to reduce the distance between the drop off area and the church. This design will move the drop off area 12 ft closer to the church. The drop off lane will be located within the existing parkway of the Wille Street right-of-way. Fire Lane Due to the Village Fire Code, the church has three options to address the fire suppression requirement. The first option is to add a sprinkler system to the church, office area and education wing. This option is considered too costly by the church (lowest quotation was over $250,000). The second option is to build a fire wall that extends 2'-8' above the roof line between the 2 existing church structure and new addition. The church also considered this option costly and both aesthetically and physically impractical. The third option is to designate areas along the church within the public right-of-way of Pine St, Wille St and Evergreen Ave as fire lanes. This is the option that St. Mark Church prefer. Staff Observations: Drop Off Lane Currently, the drop off activity occurs along the existing curb of Wille Street. Wille Street is 24' wide from edge of pavement to edge of pavement. Allowing 9' along the curb for drop off vehicles, this leaves 15' for through traffic. The proposed drop off area is 12' wide and approximately 84' long. This drop off zone could accommodate approximately 3 - 4 cars. The drop off area is proposed to be located only 25' from the intersection. Any backup of vehicles waiting to use this area may interfere with traffic on Evergreen Ave. The major issue to consider, however, is the use of public right- of-way to create drop off areas. Even though there are school & church locations where this drop off lane exists, Village policy in recent years has been to discourage this use and require the location of the drop off activities to be on private property. In this case, however, this can not be accomplished without causing the drop off lanes to cross the pedestrian sidewalk twice. This is not a preferred alternative. Fire Lane Current parking restrictions for areas requested by the church are as follows: Wille St: No Parking Any Time Evergreen Ave: Two Hour Parking Limit Pine St: Two Hour Parking Limit If these areas are designated as fire lanes, all these locations will be posted NO PARKING ANY TIME, FIRE LANE. This situation currently exists at St. Paul Church on School Street. Similar to the drop off lane request, the major consideration is the use of public streets to comply within code requirements pertaining to fire lanes. b) Discussion Mr. Tom Ernst of 1203 W. Sunset Rd said that 1) he is chairman of the 50th Anniversary Building Committee of St. Mark Church, 2) to celebrate their 50 years of service, the church decided to add an addition that would make their building more accessible to all, 3) the church has been working on the project for the last several years, 4) the church also has been working with the Village to meet the Village Fire Code, 5) there are three options to address the fire suppression requirement per the code, 6) the first option is to add a sprinkler system to the church, office area and education wing, 7) this option is too costly (lowest quotation was over $250,000), 8) the second option is to build a fire wall that extends 2'-8" above the roof line between the existing church structure and new addition, 9) this option is also costly and both aesthetically and physically impractical, and 10) the third option is to designate areas along the church within the public right-of-way of Pine St, Wille St and Evergreen Ave as fire lanes. This is the option that St. Mark Church prefer Mr. Ernst added that new addition was designed to better serve aging communities and parishioners. The proposed drop off area was designed to help physically challenged parishioners. The new curb of this drop off area will be depressed curb that would help physically challenged parishioners. Ms. Carol Tortorello of 223 S. Elmhurst Ave said that 1) she owned the property next to St. Mark Church for 23 years, 2) no surveys were performed for this request, 3) a letter to inform residents about the request was sent out without the proposed fire lane and drop off area map, 4) she sent the letter to a preschool director concerning the parking problem on Pine St in November of 1993, 5) designating fire lanes on public property is a dangerous precedent, 6) the Village has to buy private properties, if the Village wants to use any private properties (i.e., Linneman Rd Project), 7) she, then, questioned why the church is allowed to use public property, 8) if she is remodeling her house, she has to resolve all her problems without using public property. Chairman Beening said that 1) he has seen fire lanes in front of stores such as Randhurst or Walmart, not on public streets, and 2) he understands that St. Paul School has a fire lane on School St. Chairman Beening asked Paul Valentine what designating fire lane means. Paul Valentine said that designating fire lane means installing NO PARKING FIRE LANE signs only, no physical change to streets or curbs. Ms. Carol Tortorello said again that the Village is establishing a precedent by designating fire lanes on public property. Mr. Leo Floros of 111 N. Emerson said that a precedent already has been established by St. Paul Lutheran School and St. Mark Church is not establishing a precedent. Paul Valentine said that the BOCA Building Code allows expanding the existing building without requiring a sprinkler system, if an open perimeter of the building is accessible to fire fighters. That is the reason that Wille/Pine/Evergreen streets are needed to be designated as fire lanes to meet the BOCA Building Code. Mr. Todd Carlson of David Schultz Associates said that the proposed drop off area will make the church more accessible to physically challenged persons while providing good traffic flow on Wille St. Chairman Beening said that the proposed drop off area is large enough for only 2 or 3 cars and, if this drop off area is filled, any back up would block the 4 intersection. Mr. Tom Ernst said that 1) this portion of Wille St is currently used to pick up parishioners, 2) approximately 4 to 12 cars would use this pick up area in one sunday service, 3) there are about 3 Lutheran churches in Mount Prospect, and 4) there are 5 - 12 handicapped parishioners. Mr. Ernst said that the proposed drop off will enhance the traffic flow on Wille St. Commissioner Bjork asked Paul Valentine if a fire lane and a drop off area can be designated at the same location. Commissioner Bencic asked Paul Valentine why the entire Evergreen Ave was not designated as fire lane. Paul Valentine said that 1) it is acceptable to have fire lane and drop off area at the same location unless there is a double parking, 2) the required length of fire lane for the proposed addition is approximately 425', 3) only 165' of Evergreen Ave is needed to meet the required length of fire lane, and 4) the rest of Evergreen Ave will still have a 2 hour parking restriction. Chairman Beening said that the Village will be sending a wrong message to residents, if the fire lane and drop off area are approved at the same location. Chairman Beening asked if the church wants to revise their fire lane request as follows: from: Westside of Wille St (from Evergreen to 160' south of Evergreen) Eastside of Pine St (from Evergreen to 100' south of Evergreen) Southside of Evergreen Ave (from Wille to 165' west of Wille) to: Eastside of Pine St (from Evergreen to 100' south of Evergreen) Southside of Evergreen Ave (from Wille to Pine) Chairman Beening said, then, that Wille St could be used exclusively as drop off area. Mr. Ernst said that their fire lane request may be revised, if needed. Commissioner Bencic asked Paul Valentine if this revision to the fire lane request is acceptable to the Village. Paul Valentine said that it is acceptable to the Village. Mr. Leo Floros said that the church needs short term parking on Evergreen Ave. Commissioner Bobikewicz said that 1) it is better to separate the fire lane and drop off area, and 2) no surveys were done for this request. Sean Won said that no surveys were done due to a time constraint. Therefore, Commissioner Bobikewicz proposed to reconsider this request next month. Chairman Beening explained the proposed fire lane request to the Commission. Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Chairman Beening, moved to approve the following streets segments as fire lane: Westside of Wille St (from Evergreen to 160' south of Evergreen) Eastside of Pine St (from Evergreen to 100' south of Evergreen) Southside of Evergreen Ave (from Wille to 165' west of Wille) The motion was approved by a vote of 5-4. Ted Adamczyk, Paul Bures, Buz Livingston, Commissioner Mitchell and Chairman Beening voted for the motion. 61 Commissioners Bencic, Bjork, Moliere and Bobikewicz voted against the motion. Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Bjork, moved to approve the on street drop off area request on Wille St: The motion was denied by a vote of 46. Ted Adamczyk, Paul Bures, Buz Livingston, Commissioner Mitchell and Chairman Beening voted for the motion. Chairman Beening, Commissioner Bencic, Commissioner Bobikewicz, Paul Bures, Ted Adamczyk voted against the motion. B) PARKING RESTRICTION REQUEST NEAR FAIRVIEW SCHOOL & A STOP SIGN REQUEST ON FOREST AVE AT ISABELLA ST a) Background Information • Fairview School, originally, requested parking restrictions near the school in April of 1996. • The Safety Commission discussed the proposed parking restriction on July 8, 1996. • Due to residents' objection, the Safety Commission decided to study the proposed restriction further. • Fairview School & the Village Engineering Staff met in September and December of 1996 to discuss parking restrictions near Fairview School and were in agreement with the revised parking restriction. • The Safety Commission discussed the revised parking restriction on February 10, 1997 and sent a recommendation to the Village Board. • At that time, the School Board did not agree with the recommendation and requested to pull the recommendation from the Village Board agenda for further review. • Per the school request, Fairview School and the Village personnel met again in the summer of 1997 to observe the traffic near Fairview School. Fairview School and the Village agreed to pursue the following: 1. No Parking during School Hours for the following streets (see the attached map): Southside of Isabella St between Fairview Ave and Oak St (Location A) Northside of Isabella St between drop-off driveways (Location B) Westside of Forest Ave between Isabella St and Thayer St (Location C) N- A Stop Sign on Forest Ave at Isabella St Note that the Village Engineering Staff and the Fairview Safety Committee met on August 4, 1997. The Fairview Safety Committee indicated that Fairview School does not want any parking restriction on Location B. Therefore, Fairview School will request to remove Location B from their request list. School Observations: Parking Restriction Request Fairview School requested the parking restrictions to improve the safety of school children and the traffic flow. A Stop Sign on Forest Ave at Isabella St: Fairview School requested this stop sign to provide clarity of right-of-way for the drivers exiting the drop-off area and to improve the safety at the intersection. Staff Observations: Location A: To improve the safety of school children, Fairview School currently allows parents to drop off their children on the northside of Isabella St, not on the southside. Therefore, parking on the southside of Isabella St between Fairview Ave and Oak St needs to be restricted during school hours. Location B: If vehicles are parked on the northside of Isabella St between the drop-off driveways, it is difficult for exiting drivers to see the westbound traffic on Isabella St. Parking on this portion of Isabella St should be restricted during school hours also. Location C: There is a sidewalk only on the eastside of Forest Ave, not on the westside. Therefore, Fairview School wants parents to park their cars on the eastside of Forest Ave between Thayer St and Isabella St to drop off their children, not on the westside. Parking restriction during school hours on one side of Forest St will improve the traffic flow.. The One-way Stop Sign on Forest Ave at Isabella St meets the following warrant: Intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous. A total of 19 surveys were sent out in May, 1997 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion. 12 surveys were returned to the Village. 7 Parking Restrictions for Locations A, B and C 9 residents favored and 3 residents were against the proposed parking restriction. 2. A Stop Sign on Forest Ave at Isabella St 9 residents favored and 2 residents were against the proposed stop sign. Note that one resident did not provide a opinion. Recommendations: The proposed parking restrictions and a stop sign will improve the safety of children and the traffic flow. Additionally, the residents support the proposed change: Therefore, the Village Traffic Engineer recommends: 1. No Parking during School Hours for the following streets (see the attached map): Southside of Isabella St between Fairview Ave and Oak St (Location A) Northside of Isabella St between drop-off driveways (Location B) Westside of Forest Ave between Isabella St and Thayer St (Location C) 2. A Stop Sign on Forest Ave at Isabella St b) Discussion Fairview School Principal Gem DelBoccio said that 1) Location B should be removed from the school request list, 2) parking on Location B needs to be allowed, 3) mostly kindergarden parents and children will use the front door on Isabella St, 4) approximately 109 kindergarden children will attend Fairview Schhol, 5) about 70 children will be at the morning class, and 6) about 40 children will be at the afternoon class. Principal DelBoccio and Renee Anderson of 709 Forest Ave said that parking on Location B is needed for the kindergarden parents. Mr. Philip Alexandrov of 217 Forest Ave said that only 4 - 5 cars will use this Location B, 2) drop off area should be used as short term parking, and 3) Location B should be a no parking area. Mr. Alexandrov said that this was discussed twice already. Ms. Gloria Celler of 301 Autumn said that Location B is a short term parking zone. Mr. Dick Reital of 303 N. Fairview said that 1) Location B should be no parking per the original design, 2) there is enough parking on Oak St near Fairview Park, and 3) there are 97 parking spaces in the 8 main parking lot. Ms. Allison Kelly of 801 W. Isabella St said that the parking spaces on Fairview Park are not too far from the school for kindergarden parents and children. Ms. Allison asked for 15 minute parking for Location B. Ted Adamczyk said that the 15 minute parking is difficult to enforce because the police have to come back in 15 minutes. Mr. Philip Anderson of 207 Forest Ave said that vehicles are blocking his driveway and fire hydrants. Principal DelBoccio said that school cars are not parked on Forest for a long time. School Superintendent Maureen Hager said that Forest Ave is seldom used for parking based on the last two years of experience. Chairman Beening said that 1) Fairview School does not have enough short term parking spaces, and 2) Location B is used as a short term parking lot. Sean Won said that, if vehicles are parked on the northside of Isabella St between drop-off driveways, it is difficult for exiting drivers to see the westbound traffic on Isabella St. Commissioner Bjork, seconded by Commissioner Bobikewicz, moved to approve NO PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS 8:30 AM to 4:00 PM on LOCATION A. The motion was approved by a vote of 9-0. Commissioner Bencic, seconded by Ted Adamczyk, moved to approve NO PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS 8:30 AM to 4:00 PM on LOCATION B. The motion was approved by a vote of 9-0. Commissioner Bobikewicz, seconded by Paul Bures, moved to approve NO PARKING DURING SCHOOL HOURS 8:30 AM to 4:00 PM on LOCATION C. The motion was approved by a vote of 9-0. Ms. Allison Kelly of 801 W. Isabella St said that the one way stop sign on Forest at Isabella is a good idea. Commissioner Bjork, seconded by Commissioner Bobikewicz, moved to approve ONE WAY STOP SIGN ON FOREST AVE AT ISABELLA ST. The motion was approved by a vote of 9-0. C) 4 -WAY STOP SIGN AT THE INTERSECTION OF SCHOOL ST & THAYER ST a) Background Information This request was originally considered by the Safety Commission in December, 1996. At that time Mr. & Mrs. Penner requested that new traffic counts be done next summer (June 1997) and their stop sign request be reconsidered based on the new counts. The traffic volume taken in October, 1996 was only 11% of the stop sign warrants. Resident (Mr. Arnie Penner, 203 N. School Street) Observations: • Witnessed several near collisions • Configuration of School Street • (slight curve through the intersection) • Speeding at this intersection • Children riding their bicycles on Thayer Street. Staff Observations: Due to the offset of School St, chevrons were installed at the intersection. New traffic counts were collected in June, 1997. The Engineering Staff performed a new stop sign study based on the new traffic counts. The findings are as follows: 1) Accidents A search of the accident reports indicated: No Accidents at this intersection since 1992 The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant (minimum five accidents per year) for Multi -Way Stop Signs. 2) Speeding Problem The following speed surveys were performed in October, 1996 and June, 1997. Note that the speed limits of School St & Thayer St are 25 mph: 85th Percentile Speed between 10/8/96 and 10/10/96 on Thayer St West of School St: The eastbound speed was 30 - 31 mph. The westbound speed was 30 - 31 mph. 85th Percentile Speed between 6/9/97 and 6/11/97 on Thayer St West of School St and on School St North of Thayer St: The eastbound speed was 33 - 34 mph. The westbound speed was 29 - 30 mph. The northbound speed was 25 -26 mph. The southbound speed was under 20 mph. 10 New speed survey shows that the speed for the eastbound traffic went up while that for the westbound traffic went down. The offset of School St at the intersection causes speeds on School St to be lower that those on Thayer St. There is a concern about the speed of the eastbound traffic on Thayer. 3) Traffic Volume The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant is 500 vehicles/hour for eight hour periods (500 x 8 = 4000 cars/8 hrs). The traffic volumes at this intersection are as follows: Between 10/8/96 - 10/10/96: The traffic volume (443 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 11% of the stop sign warrant. Between 6/9/97 - 6/11/97: The traffic volume (491 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 12% of the stop sign warrant. Based on the new traffic counts, there is an increase of 48 cars for the 8 hour period. The traffic count is still only 12% of the stop sign warrants. 4) Sight Obstruction A number of parkway trees are located at the intersection. However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction problems. 5) Survey Results No new surveys were sent out. Previously, a total of 23 surveys were sent out in October, 1996 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion. 16 surveys were returned to the Village. 11 residents favored and 5 resident were against the 4 -way stop sign at School Street and Thayer Street. 11 Recommendation: Because the intersection of School Street and Thayer Street does not meet the multi -way stop sign warrants, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: 4 -way stop signs at the intersection of School Street and Thayer Street not be installed. b) Discussion Chairman Beening discussed the 4 -way stop sign request. Commissioner Mitchell said that the Village installed several chevrons and several speed limit signs after the last meeting. Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Moliere, moved to deny the 4 -way stop sign request at School/Thayer. The motion was approved by a vote of 9-0. D) 3 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF LOUIS/SUNSET This request was originally considered by the Safety Commission in February, 1997. At the March 4th Village Board Meeting, the Board instructed the Engineering Staff to do pedestrian counts during the summer and bring the request back to the Board. Therefore, pedestrian counts and new traffic counts were taken in June, 1997. Resident (Mr. Greg Lenski, 911 S. Louis St) Observations: Speeding at this intersection Adjacent Sunset Park Tot -lot Staff Observations: Per instructions from the Village Board, the Engineering Staff performed pedestrian counts in June, 1997. New traffic counts were also performed in June, 1997. The Engineering Staff prepared a new stop sign study based on the new traffic counts. The findings are as follows: 1) Pedestrian Count Pedestrian counts were done on Saturday 06/21/97 and on Sunday 06/22/97 from 10 AM to 12 AM and from 2 PM to 4 PM because of the heavy park use for games during these times. The total pedestrian counts using this intersection were 6 on Saturday 06/21/97 and 10 on Sunday 06/22/97. The foot traffic volume is low and does not meet the stop sign warrant. 12 2) Accidents A search of the accident reports indicated: No Accidents at this intersection since 1992 The above accident records do not meet the stop sign warrant (minimum five accidents per year) for Multi -Way Stop Signs. 3) Speeding Problem The following speed surveys were performed on Sunset Road west of Louis Street. The speed limits of Sunset Rd & Louis St are 25 mph: • 85th Percentile Speed Between 1/6/97 and 1/8/97: The eastbound speed was 36 - 37 mph. The westbound speed was 34 - 35 mph. • 85th Percentile Speed Between 6/23/97 and 6/25/97: The eastbound speed was 31 - 32 mph. The westbound speed was 29 - 30 mph. The new speed survey shows that the speeds for the east/west bound traffic went down. Speeding is a concern at the intersection. 4) Traffic Volume The minimum traffic volume for the multi -way stop sign warrant is 500 vehicles/hour for eight hour periods (500 x 8 = 4000 cars/8 hrs). The traffic volumes at this intersection are as follows: • Between 1/6/97 and 1/8/97: The traffic volume (170 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 4% of the stop sign warrant. • Between 6/23/97 - 6/25/97: The traffic volume (239 cars/8 hrs) is approximately 6% of the stop sign warrant. Based on the new traffic count, there is an increase of 69 cars for the 8 hour period. The traffic count is still only 6% of the stop sign warrants. 13 5) Sight Obstruction A number of parkway trees are located at the intersection. However, these parkway trees do not present sight obstruction problems. 6) Survey Results No new surveys were sent out. Previously, A total of 10 surveys were sent out in December, 1996 to collect and analyze the resident's opinion. 7 surveys were returned to the Village. 5 residents favored and 2 residents were against the 3 -way stop sign at Sunset Rd and Louis Street. Recommendation: Because the intersection of Sunset Road and Louis Street does not meet the multi -way stop sign warrants, The Village Traffic Engineer recommends: 3 -way stop signs at the intersection of Sunset Road and Louis Street not be installed. b) Discussion Chairman Beening said that 1) Louis St is a dead end street, 2) one resident passed his car when he was driving on Louis St several months ago, 3) most of the speeding drivers are local residents. Commissioner Bjork said that there are not many pedestrians using the intersection. Ted Adamczyz said that the smart cart was placed at the intersection several months ago to monitor traffic. Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner Bencic, moved to deny the 3 -way stop sign request at Louis/Sunset. The motion was approved by a vote of 9-0. VII. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to discuss, the Safety Commission voted 9-0 to adjourn at 10:04 P.M., upon the motion of Commissioner Bobikewicz. Commissioner Bjork seconded the motion. Sean Won Project Engineer 14 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING ATTENDANCE SHEET AUGUST 11, 1997 NAME Gerri DelBoccio (Fairview School Principal) Dick Reital Maureen Hager (Superintendent School District 57) Gloria Celler Carol Tortorello Mike Tortorello Tom Ernst Todd Carlson Philip Alexandrov Philip Anderson Renee Anderson Leo Floros Steve Polet Allison Kelly 15 ADDRESS 300 N. Fairview 303 N. Fairview 701 W. Gregory 301 Autumn 223 S. Elmhurst Ave 205 S. Pine 1203 W. Sunset 202 S. Cook, Barrington 217 N. Forest 207 N. Forest 709 N. Forest 111 N. Emerson 601 N. Wilshire 801 W. Isabella