Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. New Business 09/15/2015Village of Mount Prospect T M°°ntPr.' Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The Village has District that offe downtown district DAVID STRAHL, ACTING VILLAGE MANAGER DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 REQUEST FOR FACADE REBATE REIMBURSEMENT — BRUCE AUTOMOTIVE, 422 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY established the Fapade Rebate Program in the downtown Tax Increment Financing rs matching grants to businesses that make improvements to storefronts in the . The maximum Village contribution is $10,000 per storefront. Bruce Automotive has been in business in Mount Prospect for several decades and is a full service auto repair facility. They are proposing to refurbish the entire exterior fagade by adding a stone and HardiPlank siding and replacing the existing shingle roofing material. In addition, they are proposing to resurface the existing asphalt parking lot and a portion of a non-compliant gravel storage area. The remaining gravel area will be replaced with grass and landscaping materials. The total estimate for the work is approximately $90,000. Bruce Automotive is seeking reimbursement for $20,000 of eligible expenses related to this project. Given that the building has two street frontages and they are proposing additional site improvements, staff is supportive of the request. The Village currently has funds budgeted in account # 022.40.90.00.0.710.636.007 (page 313 of the Budget) for the 2015 budget year. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 15`h meeting. Staff will be at that meeting to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. lCooney Jr., Bruce Automotive has been opened since 1959. Our foundation is based on a commitment to honesty. For over 55 years we are proud of our exceptional service, quality, and value culture. We offer a range of automotive service and repairs. The customers are confident in us because of our commitment and years serving the Mount Prospect community, as a result we have a high ratio of return customers. Our reputation gives us a competitive advantage over other auto repair shops in the area. Being in Mount Prospect since the 1950's, most of our advertising is through customer referrals. However, we also have our own website, Facebook, Google advertising, and Yellowbook. We base our pricing on industry average, but making sure to stay within the competitors. Between social media, referrals, and websites we do not have a targeted clientele. We appeal to every age male or female. Looking forward, Gary has hired a man attending college for Automotive Management to bring in new and creative ideas. Bruce Automotive carries a lot of history and is in an ideal location. However, the building is in need of improvements. If we are able to replace siding and roof, repair and seal the parking lot, and clean up the lot, this will be critical for the business. Our goal is to improve the building and bring in new fresh ideas to continue the success of Bruce Automotive for many more years to come. a= - � wrx r s _ VE - ) | . �r >y. ........ .....�.:-.. . :..� w - -- -- �� , - - N A . Y+ RIY,,Yti;Y ",I Q- Imb -4'I1";'�%i,'; 1&1� 1 P 900 National Parkway, Suite 260 w Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 Phone (888) 7224633 Fax (847) 9951033 www rabincyou pcom Submitted To: Date: August 20, 2015 Project Name: Bruce Automotive 422 E NW Highway Mount Prospect, IL Scone of Work: Parking Lot Exaansion For Furnishing the Necessary Labor, Material and Equipment to Complete the Following: Ouantity U/M Description Unit Price Total 3,400.00 SF Parking Lot Expansion - 4" HMA / 10" Agg $ 8.95 $ 30,430°00 5,670°00 SF Remove and Replace 5" HMA Pavement $ 3.95 $ 22,396.50 4,475°00 LF PCC Joint and Crack Scaling $ 3.50 $ 15,662°50 Total Base Bid: S 68.489.00 Quantity I U/M Description FUnitTice Total 850,001 SF Remove and Replace 5" HMA Pavement 1 $ 3,95 S 3.357.50 Exclusions and Conditions: No permits, bonds, fees, soil testing, engineering, surveying, or layout. No undercutting of unsuitable material below designed subgrade or replacement with suitable material. Must have suitable access to all work areas at all times. On-site property management to locate any privately owned facilities (i,e, irrigation, site lighting, communications, etc,) If a private locator is required, it is the responsibility of others, or at an additional cost. No structural material (clay) to be imported with this price, Any buried or unforeseen structures are not included in this price. No soil stabilization is included. No importing of°topsoil for re -spreading. Any required testing of spoils to be completed by others, No contaminated or hazardous materials. Excavated material is figured to be "clean' and accepted at any dump site No fence removal, demolition, or relocation. No deviation or elevation deflection from plan, No relocation or disconnection of live utilities. "lex:eplance of Proposal - The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. Rabine Paving is authorized by the Owner/Contractor to do the work as specified. Payment will be made to Rabine Paving by Owner/Contractor as outlined above. If separate or alternate bids are indicated, acknowledge acceptance by initialing those prices which Respectfully Submitted by: Brian Blackowiez- Engineer 815.354.1800 The undersigned by entering this agreement acknowledges and agrees to the attached terms and conditions attached and hereby incorporates them into the contract agreement, Owner/Contractor: Date of Acceptance: Signature: L-/038.oa GARE.LI ROOFING SIDING & WINDOWS 1921 Country Dr Suite 301 J 1�r �Ll� , C, C� Grayslake IL 60030 Office #847-693-0122 www.grswexteriors.com HOME IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT NAME: ����� (Owner) ADDRESS: DATE: CITY STATE: ZIP CODE: PHONE: ALT PHONE: The undersigned Seller agrees to furnish the following materials, improvements, labor, and/or services: QRSW riceincludes all materials, labor, permits, tax, warranty, clean up, and haul away old debris. (permits where applicable) to furnish and install all above products. Ili isjob to start a: roxlrnatci coiiimernccrneitt date") to be completed a roxtmate] pp y --�• p pp y ._...__ These dates are approximations and may vary slightly. Total Sale Price of work to be performed S Deposit Today $ (cash, ck#, ,other) Payment of balance will be made in one equal payment of $ due on completion. CC# _ _ Exp: CVV Re ues _� �.�.. q tedfinancing?Y❑ N❑ "type: OWNER HAS READ AND FULLY UNDERSTANDS TIT TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE mCOO NTAINED HEREIN AND ON THE REVERSE SIDE, ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COMPLETED COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT AND OF NOTICE OF CANCELLATION, AND HAS INSTRUCTED CONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH WORK ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT. OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COPY OF THE PAMPHLET, `PROTECT YOUR FAMILYFROM LEAD IN YOUR HOME"P AND A COPY OF THE PAMPHLET, "HOME REPAIR: KNOW YOUR CONSUMER RIGHTS". G RS BY: OWNER'S APPROVAL (BUYER) Approval: OWNER SIGNATURE OWNER SIGNATURE Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID STRAHL, ACTING VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 Prospect SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FACADE REBATE REIMBURSEMENT — TOKENS AND TANKARDS — 18 W. BUSSE AVENUE The Village has established the Fagade Rebate Program in the downtown Tax Increment Financing District that offers matching grants to businesses that make improvements to storefronts in the downtown district. The maximum Village contribution is $25,000 for restaurant operations. Tokens and Tankards is a unique gastropub concept that will feature an expansive menu of local craft beer, cider and food options. They have entered into a lease for the former Ye Olde Town Inn space located at 18 W. Busse Avenue. The owner has submitted plans that call for the installation of two ADA accessible washrooms, the replacement of all lighting fixtures and reworking the main entrance into the restaurant. The total project costs are estimated at approximately $75,000. Tokens and Tankards is seeking reimbursement for $25,000 of eligible expenses related to this project. The Village currently has sufficient funds budgeted in account # 022.40.90.00.0.710.636.007 (page 313 of the Budget) for the 2015 budget year. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 15th meeting. Staff will be at that meeting to answer any questions related to this matter. � � � William J. Cooney Jr. "3 Tokens Et Tankards Executive Summary Who We Are Tokens & Tankards is a unique gastropub concept opening soon in the Northwest Suburbs of Chicago, specifically designed to appeal to suburbanites. T&T will feature a nostalgic atmosphere with an expansive menu of local craft beer, cider and food options, alongside a selection of vintage, coin-operated video and pinball games. Most of these games were manufactured in the Chicagoland area. In the early 80's, coin- operated games were once a staple of the American landscape, and could be found everywhere from the local laundromat to the arcades found in nearly every mall in America. But technological advances in home video game consoles in the '90s and 2000s nearly drove these games to extinction. Now, in just the past few years, interest in these vintage games has exploded. Arcade and pinball games are taking the spotlight in pop culture, in highly successful films like Wreck -it -Ralph, Tron: Legacy and King of Kong, two of which have planned sequels in the works. And Bud Light's 2015 Super Bowl commercial features a life-sized Pac-Man maze. In parallel, craft beer sales continue to grow year -over -year, with the category seeing 20% growth year -over -year in 2013, with an increase of 2.5% in on -premise beer consumption nationwide. 2013 marks the fourth straight year of double-digit growth for the craft beer industry. Here in the City of Chicago proper, multiple companies have recognized and seized these opportunities already. Emporium Arcade Bar in Wicker Park and Headquarters Beercade in Lakeview are similar concepts, and have both more than doubled their square footage within their first two years of operation. Each has also opened a second location in 2014. Logan Hardware, an arcade and pinball game museum in Logan Square, also opened their second location in Q1 2014, an arcade bar concept aptly called Logan Arcade. While Chicago's urban market continues to get more competitive with each passing quarter, this concept has yet to see a proper execution in the Chicago suburbs. Furthermore, none of these concepts serve high-quality gastropub cuisine, conceptualized by one of Chicago's finest chefs. Tokens & Tankards intends to meet this demand head on, as Chicago's GastrocadeTM. We will leverage the proven arcade craft beer bar business model, making small tweaks to maximize its profit potential and appeal in the suburban market. CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT DISSEMINATE. This business plan contains confidential, trade -secret information and is shared only with the understanding that you will not share its contents or ideas with third parties without the express written consent of the plan author, Tokens Et Tankards Tokens & Tankards was conceived and developed by Vince Scalabrino. Vince comes from a family of restaurateurs, who have been running successful restaurants in the Grand Rapids, Michigan area for decades. He has nearly 10 years of management experience, leading efforts ranging from console video games to digital marketing campaigns. He has a wealth of experience directing teams of 7 to 70 people, and is comfortable dealing with challenges both financial and personnel -related. Vince has coordinated numerous charity events at local bars, restaurants and theaters over the past three years, raising nearly $20,000 for Comer Children's Hospital. In doing so, he's built an expansive network of contacts with local businesses throughout the Chicago area. As a result of his charity work and professional networking, he is well-connected in both the local craft brewing and arcade restoration industries. In his spare time, Vince restores vintage arcade video and pinball games, and is a homebrewer. His arcade restoration mentor is Doc Mack, owner of Galloping Ghost arcade, the largest arcade in the world. He's also taken brewing classes from and built a relationship with Chris Tourre, owner and brewmaster of Arcade Brewery, one of Chicago's premiere up-and- coming craft breweries. Vince also has entrepreneurial experience, having formerly owned and operated his own successful mobile DJ business. Vince's focus will be on Tokens & Tankard's marketing strategy and operations success. He will also continue to develop relationships with other local businesses and partners. Lastly, he will provide oversight and partnership to our Assistant Manager and Head Cook, monitoring front and back of the house metrics to identify and eliminate any potential inefficiencies in our processes. Tom Reboletti will serve an important advisory role for Tokens & Tankards, bringing to bear his over 30 years of restaurant and bar experience, formerly owning three of his own establishments. He's also consulted on the launch of nearly 40 restaurants and bars in the Chicago area. As an added bonus, Tom also co -owned and operated a successful local arcade during the arcade boom of the early 1980's, which gives him a truly unique perspective on this concept. As a licensed real estate broker, Tom negotiated tenancy on behalf of T&T. He has also been instrumental in talent acquisition and screening. Most importantly, he will be working with Vince to develop control systems and processes, to be codified in the Tokens & Tankards Operations Manual. These controls will drive efficiency and profitability, ensuring that T&T consistently exceeds our pro -forma forecasts. 7 CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT DISSEMINATE. This business plan contains confidential, trade -secret information and is shared only with the understanding that you will not share its contents or ideas with third parties without the express written consent of the plan author. Tokens Ft Tankards Chef Henry Watson is Tokens & Tankards' Culinary Advisor, and is responsible for building Tokens & Tankards' unique menu and training our kitchen staff. Our menu is inspired by British and Belgian gastropub fare, relying on fresh, local ingredients to ensure it is both nutritious and delicious. Henry has over a decade and a half of kitchen experience, most recently serving as the Executive Chef at McCormick & Schmick's, where he coordinated the launch of several new locations throughout the Midwest. Since then, he's gone on to open his own successful catering and consulting business. Henry is excited about Tokens & Tankards' concept, and is creating a menu designed to pair perfectly with T&T's expansive beer selection. The menu is sure to please the palates of both beer aficionados and foodies alike. When it comes to arcade games, Doc Mack reigns supreme. He is the owner and operator of the largest arcade in the world, Galloping Ghost, in Brookfield, Illinois. Doc's amassed a collection of over 400 video and pinball games, and has built relationships with hundreds of vintage game collectors and arcade game designers, many of whom still live here in the Chicago area. As one might expect, Doc is also one of the most knowledgeable arcade video game repair specialists in the Midwest, and has served as Vince's mentor with respect to game repair. As our Game Advisor, Doc oversees game requisition and repair for Tokens & Tankards. Cooney, Bill From: Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:29 AM To: Cooney, Bill Subject: Re: Application for Downtown TIF District Matching Grant I'm still waiting for the MEP drawings to come back from the engineering team. I'm meeting with them today for a second walkthrough, and will do what I can to accelerate. This is very preliminary, and somewhat aggressive, but here are some rough budget numbers that I received from a few different contractors. I expect electrical will go up once the detailed electrical plan is ready, as we are doing a complete replacement of existing, down to the subpanels, and not including the kitchen. Demo existing ceiling grid (4000 sf). $2000 OR New grid & ceiling tile (4000 sf). $14,000 Paint existing grid & new ceiling tile (4000). $10,000 CEILING TOTAL: $12,000416,000 LIGHTING: New (2 x 4) fluorescent lay in fixtures (40 qty). $8,000 OR $8500-9000 in cans, another $2700 for LED dimmable bulbs (preferred) Light fixtures: 20 in main dining 28 in front dining 28 in game area 85-90 fixtures total LIGHTING TOTAL: $8000-11,700 Bathrooms (based on proposed layout) not knowing the extent of required structural work $12-$14,000 per bathroom BATHROOM TOTAL: $24,000-28,000 Woodwork (South wall & half wall in dining room 1, hostess & waiting area) approximately 1000 wall sf. Budget $3500 - $4000 to fix damaged areas, sand, refinish and seal. WOODWORK (WALLS): $3500-4000 SUBTOTAL: $47,500-56,000 ELECTRICAL ALLOWANCE: $18,000 ALL -IN TOTAL: $65,500-77,700 Vince Scalabrino Owner, General Manager Tokens & Tankards m: 847.769.8291 vince@tokensandtankards.com Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID STRAHL, ACTING VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 SUBJECT: PZ -16-15 / 300 E. EVERGREEN AVENUE / VARIATION ;14I)urn I,r�isIx,c1 The subject property is improved with a two-story single-family residence, gravel driveway and related improvements. The gravel driveway is nonconforming with the Village Code as driveways or parking lots are required to be paved. The Petitioner does not desire to pave the driveway and is seeking a variation from the Village Code requirement to pave the gravel driveway. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the request on Thursday, August 27, 2015 and by a vote of 7-0, recommended approval of a variation from the requirement to pave an existing gravel driveway. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 15, 2015 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J Cooney, AIBP Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -16-15 LOCATION: PETITIONER: OWNER: PARCEL #: LOT SIZE: ZONING: LAND USE: REQUEST: 300 E. Evergreen Avenue Thomas F. Karlov Thomas F. Karlov 08-12-111-010-0000 0.27 acres (11,767.08 square feet) RA Single Family Residence Single Family Residential Variation from the requirement to pave an existing gravel driveway LOCATION MAP Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON FROM: CONSUELO ANDRADE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: AUGUST 19, 2015 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 27, 2015 SUBJECT: PZ -16-15 / 300 E. EVERGREEN AVENUE / VARIATION (GRAVEL DRIVEWAY) BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 27, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Thomas F. Karlov (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 300 E. Evergreen Avenue (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking a variation from the requirement to pave an existing gravel driveway to allow the gravel driveway to remain. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the July 8, 2015 edition of the Daily Herald newspaper. In addition, Staff has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 feet and posted a public hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located at the northeast corner of the Elm Street and Evergreen Avenue intersection. The Subject Property is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered by the RA District to the north and east and the R3 Low -Density Residential PUD to the west and south. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Plat of Survey indicates a two-story single-family residence, gravel driveway, and walkways. The survey was completed in 1987 and does not reflect an existing patio that was constructed at the northwest corner of the house in 2004. The gravel driveway is nonconforming with the Village Code. Village Code requires existing gravel driveway or parking lot to be paved. The Petitioner does not desire to pave the driveway and is seeking a variation from the Village Code requirement to pave the gravel driveway. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE With the exception of the front yard setback, the Subject Property currently complies with the Village's RA zoning regulations. The following table compares the existing improvements to the RA Single Family Residence District's bulk requirements. PZ -16-15 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 27, 2015 Page 3 VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request and finds that the standards for a variation have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's response to the standards. The Subject Property's characteristics are unique and unusual, which would not be applicable to other property in the Village. The gravel driveway is in keeping with the historic character of the Subject Property, which dates back to 1916. The petitioner has demonstrated their efforts to maintain the historic character of the property and that the gravel driveway is in keeping with that character. Aside from replacing the front porch and walkway, the property essentially remains as it did when the property was developed. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the Petitioner's variation request meets the standards as listed in the Zoning Ordinance and that granting such request would be in the best interest of the Village. Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: "A variation from the requirement to pave an existing gravel driveway." This case is Village Board final. I concur: William J. Cooney, AI P Director of Community Development /it HAPLAMPlmwing & Zoning COMMIP&Z 201SSlaff Reports\PZ-16-15 300 E. Evergrecn Avc.(VAR- Gravel Ddvcaav),docx RA Single Family District Requirements Existing Setbacks: Front (south) Min. 30' 23' Exterior Side (west) Min. 20' 20' Interior Side (_east) Min. 5' 23' Rear (north) Min. 25' 77' Lot Coverage Max. 50% 21% VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request and finds that the standards for a variation have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's response to the standards. The Subject Property's characteristics are unique and unusual, which would not be applicable to other property in the Village. The gravel driveway is in keeping with the historic character of the Subject Property, which dates back to 1916. The petitioner has demonstrated their efforts to maintain the historic character of the property and that the gravel driveway is in keeping with that character. Aside from replacing the front porch and walkway, the property essentially remains as it did when the property was developed. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the Petitioner's variation request meets the standards as listed in the Zoning Ordinance and that granting such request would be in the best interest of the Village. Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: "A variation from the requirement to pave an existing gravel driveway." This case is Village Board final. I concur: William J. Cooney, AI P Director of Community Development /it HAPLAMPlmwing & Zoning COMMIP&Z 201SSlaff Reports\PZ-16-15 300 E. Evergrecn Avc.(VAR- Gravel Ddvcaav),docx MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -16-15 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTY: Hearing Date: August 27, 2015 300 E. Evergreen Avenue Thomas Karlov July 8, 2015 08-12-111-010-0000 Variation to allow a gravel driveway Thomas Fitzgerald William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chair Agostino Filippone - Associate Sharon Otteman Consuelo Andrade, Deputy Director of Community Development Thomas Karlov Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Commissioner Beattie made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 23rd, 2015 meeting; Commissioner Youngquist seconded the motion. The minutes were approved 7-0. Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ -16-15 300 E. Evergreen Avenue. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner for PZ -16-15 is seeking a variation from the requirement to pave an existing gravel driveway to allow the gravel driveway to remain at 300 E. Evergreen Avenue. She further stated the Subject Property is located at the northeast corner of the Elm Street and Evergreen Avenue intersection and is zoned RA Single Family Residence and is bordered by the RA District to the north and east and the R3 Low -Density Residential PUD to the west and south. Ms. Andrade explained the subject property includes a two-story single-family residence, gravel driveway, and walkways. The gravel driveway is nonconforming with the Village Code. Village Code requires existing gravel driveway or parking lot to be paved. The Petitioner does not desire to pave the driveway and is seeking a variation from the Village Code requirement to pave the gravel driveway. Ms. Andrade summarized the standards for a variation as the following: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -16-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Ms. Andrade indicated Staff reviewed the Petitioner's request and found the request met the the standards for a variation. She explained that the Subject Property's characteristics are unique and unusual, which would not be applicable to other properties in the Village. The gravel driveway is in keeping with the historic character of the Subject Property, which dates back to 1916. Ms. Andrade further stated that the petitioner had demonstrated their efforts to maintain the historic character of the property and that the gravel drivewaywas in keeping with that character. Aside from replacing the front porch and walkway, the property essentially remains as it did when the property was developed. Ms. Andrade stated that the Petitioner's variation request meets the standards as listed in the Zoning Ordinance and that granting such request would be in the best interest of the Village. Staff recommended that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: "A variation from the requirement to pave an existing gravel driveway." Ms. Andrade stated that this case is Village Board final. Commissioner Youngquist asked why the topic of gravel driveways was being brought up as an issue. Ms. Andrade stated that the Zoning Code was amended requiring gravel driveways and parking lots to be paved by January 1St, 2015. She stated that Staff is following up on these structures to ensure they are complying with the code. Chairman Donnelly stated that two neighbors by the Subject Property sent letters to the board stating they are in support of the Variation. He further asked if the gravel driveway could be extended if the Petitioner decides to build a garage in the future. Ms. Andrade responded the Variation would only be applicable to the existing driveway. Chairman Donnelly swore in Tom Karlov from 300 E. Evergreen. Mr. Karlov stated that he and his wife purchased the house in 1987 with the intent to repair the historical home and restore it to the original time period in which the house was built. He also gave a brief history about the Subject Property stating that it used to be the home of Fred Busse. Mr. Karlov further explained that they do use it as a driveway and would like to build a garage on the side but would still keep the gravel driveway as is because it is a part of the original homestead. Chairman Donnelly clarified that if the variance is granted it only applies to the gravel driveway and if any improvements are made, the variation can be taken away. Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -16-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman 3 Mr. Karlov stated that he understood. Mr. Mizwicki asked the petitioner if he was going to build a two car garage why would he want to keep the gravel driveway. Mr. Karlov stated he isn't sure if he will build a two car garage and that the gravel driveway is part of the character of the home. He explained that he is part of the historical society and is just trying to preserve the house as it was. The commissioners applauded the Petitioner for his efforts in preserving the home. Chairman Donnelly asked if there was anyone else from the audience that wanted to discuss the case. Hearing none, he closed the public portion of the hearing and brought the discussion back to the board. Commissioner Beattie made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Kueter to approve the following motion: "To approve: A variation from the requirement to pave an existing gravel driveway." UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Filippone, Fitzgerald, Beattie, Younquist, Kueter, Mizwicki, Donnelly NAYS: None The vote was approved 7-0 with a positive recommendation to the Village Board. After hearing two (2) additional cases, Commissioner Younguist made a motion seconded by Commissioner Filippone and the meeting was adjourned at 9:14 pm. Jenna Moder, Administrative Assistant Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -16-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman �• r C'�2�G�.� �� Gni Z. L�'t- •� G.� eZ A)lJ ,� r Andrade, Consuelo From: Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 9:37 AM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: Case No. PZ -16-15 Case No. PZ -16-15 Commonly known as: 300 E. Evergreen Ave PIN#: 08-12-111-010-0000 Pettion/Owner: Thomas F. Karlov Planning and Zoning Commission, This is in reply to your letter dated July 8, 2015 regarding the existing gravel driveway at the address listed above. I have no problems with the gravel driveway locate on the Elm St side of the property and its concrete boarder remaining. It has existed there for many, many years. The gravel drive way is part of the historic nature of one of Mount Prospects original families beautiful 4 Square houses . It does not in anyway distract from any of the other houses on that block nor does impair any vehicle are pedestrian flow. Please let it remain and focus your time and resources on issues of real importance to the Village and its Residents. Thank you for asking for my comments and seriously considering my reply in your decision. Daniel G. Burkhard 111 S Maple St Mount Prospect, IL 60056 This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com Andrade, Consuelo From: Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 2:33 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: CASE NO. PZ -16-15 Concerning the petition seeking a Variation from the requirement to pave the driveway at 300 E. Evergreen. CASE NO. PZ -16-15 We live directly across Elm from the driveway in question. We have been neighbors for over 20 years. The Karlov's house and property is maintained beautifully. The driveway does not litter the street with any debris at any time. We assume the purpose of this requirement is to maintain the value of the neighborhood, both financially and astatically. In keeping with that purpose, we see no reason why the variation should not be granted. Joe Anzelone Peg Anzelone 122 S. Elm This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com Andrade, Consuelo From: Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:14 AM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: PZ16-15 Please do not use my name publicly, this is in regard to 300 E Evergreen. PZ16-15. There is no hardship that exist which would require an exemption/variance to the Village ordinance requiring gravel drives be paved. We do not support the request.Look at the two homes on the east side of south Elm, 8 and 10 and you will see two drives requiring pavement. When 10 S Elm requested a plot of consolidation and a zoning variance more that 5 years ago, they were required to pave the drive as part of the variance. It never took place, so if you grant a variance on 300 E Evergreen, you will need one for 8 and 10 S Elm. This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit fittp://www.sy anteccloud.com Andrade, Consuelo From: Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 10:12 AM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: Case No. PZ -16-15 Case No. PZ -16-15 Commonly Known As: 300 E. Evergreen Avenue Pin#: 08-12-111-010-0000 Petitioner/Owner: Thomas F. Karlov 300 E. Evergreen Avenue Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Nature Of Request: Petitioner is seeking a Variation ....... The Karlov's have petitioned to exempt their gravel driveway from the Village of Mount Prospect Village Code. You need only to visit the house and property to allow the variation they are seeking. Their property has always been beautifully maintained and is a valuable asset to the neighborhood. You cannot seriously want to make them pave over the driveway. The property will have lost the historical significance that, I am sure, they are trying to maintain. Frankly, I believe it would become an eyesore. Please assist them in maintaining a back to the old charm that the Village should be known for in the Triangle. Respectfully, Rita Waters This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 7 VILLAGE O F MOUNT PROSPECT imount Prospect Community Develop 4in_-Art> _ ino, Divisinn 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone: (847) 818-5328 Fax: (847) 818-5329 Zoning Request Application OFFICIAL USE ONLY (To be completed by Village Staff) Case Number: P&Z - 1(a - ! Date of Submission: t S Hearing Dater_ -ffdo/.5- 0000001 Development Name/Address: VAK r -ed, VvP ree rr<'. I. SUBJECT PROPERTY Address(es): Zoning District (s): Property Area: IA• i o X 68180 Sq.Ft. Parcel Index Number(s)(PIN): �� `� . "' t)IC) 0000 Adjacent Zoning Districts: To the North: To the South: To the East: To the West: Conditional Use: For Adjacent Land Uses: To the North: To the South: To the East: To the West: II. ZONING REQUEST(S) (Check all that apply) ,Variation(s): From Chapter 14, Section(s) 3 ® i ❑ Zoning Map Amendment: Rezone From to ❑ Zoning Text Amendment: Section(s) ❑ Other: Official Use Only (To be completed by Village Staff): ❑ Administrative, ❑ P&Z Final, ❑ Village Board Final Hours of Operation: 111. SUMMARY OF REQUESTED ACTION(S) r� IV. APPLICANT (all correspondence will be sent to the applicant) It Name: Corporation: Interest In Property: D (e.g. owner, bu er, developer, lessee, architect, attorney etc...) Address: Work Phone: � Cell Phone: Cell Phone: Email:, -VII. PROPOSED SITE INFORMATION Building Size: Sq. Ft. Tenant Space Size: Sq.Ft. Land Use: Building Setbacks: (N) Feet, Inches (S) Feet, Inches (E) Feet, Inches (W) Feet, Inches Lot Coverage: (Overall Impervious) Sq. Ft. Parking Provided: Standard Accessible Vill. DEVELOPMENT/PROJECT PROFESSIONALS Email: Fax: Email: Fax: Email: Fax: 8 4. Landscape Architect Name: Address: Email: Phone: Fax: 5. Surveyor Name: Address: Email: Phone: Fax: 6. Attorney Name: Address: Email: Phone: Fax: In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. 1 hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate to the best of m knowledge. Applicant: Date:W-27 L7M' (Signature) IAAAk� �C" (Print Name) If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application and the associ ted supppAiiTVhaterial. Property Owner: Date: �I ZZ I ZOIS® (Signatures (� (Print Name) The herein request seeks a variance from the Village Code "302.3.1 Gravel Driveways and Parking Lots", as it relates petitioner's (JP and Tom Karlov) residential property located at 300 E. Evergreen Avenue, Mt. Prospect, Illinois, 60056. The basis for the request is primarily predicated upon a historic rational. The subject property was developed by Fredric Busse in 1916 (1 -year before the Village of Mt. Prospect was incorporated), and which included the petitioner's existing 2 -story farmhouse and 8' x 39.5' gravel driveway and the next store neighbor's 2-story/6-stall horse -barn. One year later in 1917, Mr. Busse commissioned a similar adjacent house for his son and his growing family. Across the street from these two houses and during this same period, Mr. Busse and his family developed what became known as Busse Flowers (and greenhouses). Subsequent to the passing of the original residence, the property remained in the Busse estate and was utilized to house visiting pastors of St. Paul Lutheran Church. Then in 1982, after years of limited internal and external maintenance, the remaining plot was divided and the two farmhouses where sold to separate owners. Although the greenhouses no longer remain, as that land was subsequently redeveloped in conjunction with the Village's initial TIF program, the two farmhouses, the 2 -story horse -barn and the gravel driveway remain today. Petitioners purchased the house in 1987 in a condition that reflected 25-30 years of minimum maintenance and immediately commenced on a 28 -year labor -of -love towards restoring the residence to its original grandeur. To that end, the majority of the projects were completed by the owners in conjunction with friends/family, with the underpinning that each project was to strive to replicate the original Busse homestead. Examples as follows: - Restored the original cedar -siding; - Roof replaced with period cedar shingles; - Window glass incorporating historic "waves and bubbles"; - Authentic / original claw-foot tub and pedestal sink in the house's only bathroom; - Replace entire front wrap-around porch (after fallen parkway -tree destroyed original); - 100% of all accents, both out -side and within are either original turn -of -the -century pieces or quality reproductions when originals where not available; and - Replaced front -walk, in conjunction with the damage done by above mentioned park -way tree, utilizing period -correct brick and granite pavers removed from reconstructed Elgin, IL streets. The list goes on and on, but suffice it to say that there is almost nothing onsite that deviates from the original Busse homestead. The only two exceptions to site's originality where as a result of uncontrollable natural events; the replacement of the front -porch and walk (necessitated by fallen tree) and the replacement of the east -side walk / pad (necessitated by sewer collapse cause by ground - heaving). Perhaps the strongest statement exemplifying the petitioner's commitment to originality is the fact the house in not air-conditioning, but instead utilizes period -correct celling fans through the summer. As additional background, it's worth noting that both petitioners have significant Mt. Prospect Historical Society involvement as follows: - Tom Karlov, it's then Vice -President, was one of three initial "crusaders", in conjunction with Paul Hoefert (then President) and Carolyn Krauss (then Mayor), relative to procuring Mt. Prospect's Dietrich- Fried rick house as a permanent museum for the Mt. Prospect Historical Society; - Petitioners amongst the original founders of the Mt. Prospect Historical Society Annual Housewalk; - Petitioner's home was on the Historical Society's Annual Housewalk.n 1999 and again in 1997.: I bring the above to your attention only to exemplify the petitioner's commitment to preserving Mt. Prospect's history and its original character. Being on a corner -lot within the older -section of the Village's "triangle" area, the house has become a well-known and highly admired part of the neighborhood. It's not uncommon for folks walking by (or even driving in their car) to stop and comment on how "wonderfully the house is being maintained ....... complete strangers routinely take photographs of our home and have been asked if they can "have a look inside". On a number of occasions, people have knocked on the door to ask if they can take measurements of various features of the house, and we're proud to say that there are multiple houses in the Village that copied various attributes of our home. The petitioners understand the fact that many of the existing houses in Mt. Prospect were built in an era of 1 -car households which incorporated a narrow driveway and an attached 1 -car garage. We also understand that simply throwing a bit a gravel next to the existing driveway, to allow for additional off- street parking, isn't a very aesthetically pleasing solution. But that's not the case under discussion herein. The petitioner's gravel driveway is part of the historic character of the original 1916 Busse homestead which its owners have been trying to preserve for the last 28 -years. The 8' by 39.5' driveway incorporates a visible 9-12" cement easement which angles downward 2-3 inches towards where the start of the gravel, which was subsequently complimented 25 -years ago by bordering the drive with sunken railroad ties in an effort to preserve its boundaries ......a tasteful presentation to that part of the house's history. Before making a decision relative to the merits of the above request, the petitioners would like to invite each of you to minimally drive by the subject property and observe what we've attempted to described above, since they say "a picture is worth a thousand words". If you have the time, please come up and knock on the front door (they didn't have door bells back in 1916) and we'd also welcome sharing the inside, of what many consider the most historically original house in Mt. Prospect. Variation — Required Standards: A variation from the zoning regulations shall not be granted or recommended for approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission unless findings of fact based on evidence are made in each specific case that affirm the following standards: 1. Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulation was to apply; Response: Maintaining this house to its original 1916 character has been a 28 -year labor of love for the petitioners. Aside from replacing the porch (fallen parkway tree destroy the original porch; and replacing side walk/pad after sewer -line break reconstruction destroyed the original); the house essentially remains as it did back when Fredrik Busse moved there in1916. 2. The condition upon which an application for a variance is based is unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other property within the same zoning classification; Response: The house is arguably the most original per -Village of Mt. Prospect residence. As a result of their ongoing involvement with the Mt. Prospect Historical Society forsome 25 -years, we are very familiar with all of the historic pre -1917 houses within the Village, and none, not even the Historical Society's museum, equal the preservation standards adhered at subject property. 3. The purposes of the variation is not based primarily upon a desire to increase financial gain. Response: Absolutely not, just the opposite. Anyone involved with a historic preservation will tell you that it's not a cheap proposition ........ not much in the way of Menards or Home Depot at this house. Most everything needs to be researched and purchased mostly on-line, sometimes at a 100-200% premium over what a cheap imitation might cost at a local home improvement store. 4. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Response: True. The only person that could conceivable be blamable for any of the preservation issues with the property would be Fredric Busse, and he's long ago deceased. 5. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located: Response: True. Actually, preserving the historic character of the property, as we have painstakingly tried to maintain, actually benefits the overall character of the neighborhood. 6. The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and Response: Maintaining the high preservation standard of what has become a live-in 99 -years old museum is what actually gives this neighborhood its essential character. The property is located in the southwest -corner (the oldest section) of the historic "triangle" neighborhood, which was originally developed by the Busse family. 1 challenge everyone on this Committee to question anyone residing within the historic "triangle" neighborhood about "the house on the corner of Elm and Evergreen ......... let them be the judge to this question. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public street, or increase the damage to fire, or impair the natural drainage or create drainage problems on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Response: Maintaining the proposed gravel -driveway will actually help eliminate drainage issues by not adding to the ever-increasing level of impervious surfaces within the Village. Relative to property values, petitioners are routinely told by passersby that "they love our home" and multiple owners who have purchase townhouses (51 -unit townhouse complex on two -sides of the subject property) have stated reasons for actually buying where they did was because of the overall character of the neighborhood while at the some time commenting on the beauty of our house. r? . fin - Al-�. � MA ML., -. � R ,d i s - 1i i • j *Nor ° r 3 Rte; w .�«���_�, \� . �� d .y. in, \ . : Im W -ft j 6 Flat of Survey N ___Nolll 100' 01 Lol 1 Scale, 30' 74.110' 05 .2 Neighbors a Garage E. EVERGREEN 32' Bituminous Road z 1IR NORIH 1 10 FiAl 111F EAST r: FFT III, L� FOF I IN WAICK N I , I ::"." ��' , RES] V I I IIIN 1�4 I' It '�T PM�SPE �E F 1 1 1 ('N I ;' r('14N S�j I p I N" RI'H. kA,'(.F :I I It E 'RI/ 1, RINI ;P%I. MERIDIAN, IN 1,00K !11- 100 E. EVERGREEN AVENUE. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS AVEWF�' Ordered by I Lrlo,Belconis Aft. Job no. 176-31 SI'NTF OF !LL P%11 'M ^1F I 011K i. KFI-1! E. Z. -MY, REt;ISTLREI) LAM, 11RVF,' N —t 11F 1F ![,i,]'I�)lti.tuoyHIRIBY,,,,:IRI'IFY THAT —'?1VF, ;W� 3FFN MADE F'i(Ri.RED HEREON, kNI) THAT 1HE PI -Ar I41:N1j,fillAWE A WKRE(,[ REPRE�EI KATE:ATION THEREOF. ollk oil ATE: 3-04-111171 KFAH-f- . AIy Z I LUN011 i0k, 7; % SURVEYOR ,... BARRMTON ENC*4EERW6 -- 413 EAST MAIN STREET -- BARRINGTON LLHOS 60010-- 02) 3826337 Oon& L Stone ' Drive LOT C. .0 W d� h C) E*e d CR OD War AM 3. Q. r :4—' E. EVERGREEN 32' Bituminous Road z 1IR NORIH 1 10 FiAl 111F EAST r: FFT III, L� FOF I IN WAICK N I , I ::"." ��' , RES] V I I IIIN 1�4 I' It '�T PM�SPE �E F 1 1 1 ('N I ;' r('14N S�j I p I N" RI'H. kA,'(.F :I I It E 'RI/ 1, RINI ;P%I. MERIDIAN, IN 1,00K !11- 100 E. EVERGREEN AVENUE. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS AVEWF�' Ordered by I Lrlo,Belconis Aft. Job no. 176-31 SI'NTF OF !LL P%11 'M ^1F I 011K i. KFI-1! E. Z. -MY, REt;ISTLREI) LAM, 11RVF,' N —t 11F 1F ![,i,]'I�)lti.tuoyHIRIBY,,,,:IRI'IFY THAT —'?1VF, ;W� 3FFN MADE F'i(Ri.RED HEREON, kNI) THAT 1HE PI -Ar I41:N1j,fillAWE A WKRE(,[ REPRE�EI KATE:ATION THEREOF. ollk oil ATE: 3-04-111171 KFAH-f- . AIy Z I LUN011 i0k, 7; % SURVEYOR ,... BARRMTON ENC*4EERW6 -- 413 EAST MAIN STREET -- BARRINGTON LLHOS 60010-- 02) 3826337 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION TO ALLOW A GRAVEL DRIVEWAY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 300 EAST EVERGREEN AVENUE. MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Thomas F. Karlov (Petitioner), has filed a petition for a Variation to allow gravel driveway for property located at 300 East Evergreen Avenue (Property) and legally described as: LOT "C" (EXCEPT THE NORTH 100 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE EASAT 75 FEET THEREOF) IN BLOCK 8 IN BUSSE AND WILLE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MOUNT PROSPECT IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 12,TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PROPERTY INDEX NUMBER: 08-12-111-010-0000 WHEREAS, the "Petitioner" seeks a Variation to allow a gravel driveway as shown on the as shown on the, Plat of Survey dated March 4, 1987, attached as Exhibit "A" for the property located at 300 East Evergreen Avenue; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for a Variation being the subject of PZ -16-15 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of August, 2015, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Daily Herald News a er on the 8th day of July 2015; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the Mayor and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ -16-15; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the request meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the Variation to allow a gravel driveway would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect grant a Variation to allow a gravel driveway as shown on the as shown on the Plat of Survey dated March 4, 1987, attached as Exhibit "A". SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance and Exhibit "A" with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR:. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication form in the manner provided by law. AYES.- NAYS: YES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 2015. Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk Flat of Survey N 1 I' North 100' 01 Loi "C' " 74J O _ J 9 W: Pi p R ° Neighhars Rg � rt Garage 1.. fA I i LOT eC I AA J d O m.I' rA9o`" ed m ..I h — a aror .,*., � Porch LL > � ; ' `Cewcveto Sdo Ok E. EVERGRE91fill AVENL 32' allw0nous Road ........... ` ,v f v Bwf LOT I Ft° F!9 IHV NORTH ISH' FFF f :�BF:kFtpF •rYG I.Y' !'P' TIPF Ordered by EErvrEo alc mE +� FA.r '� FFFF iHFRE"Ft 01 RI1H'R E' I. IVH I.L'+ 31 R ESP HH 11" I'IN I1 401 'IT PROSOE." I': ihE '.;k i1 4 LF t�F Ir Cl ION Job n0. �� � I !, VSIIIP If `IC1Rl H. IIAW;F it r— IPF FHF. r.,Rlt I'RIVI:;M. ,E i:00 c;4RaR I01.41'Y. ILI t°01i', t ., 5"r WE IIF ;LL..:rr•.. I tiS , t,, YTY .IF L'o't ' t rFl rI! E. 1-ACY, 111GIS'FLRED L\Rd, tit RVUIR HERE6V L:F.HTSFY THAT l + HVV,' 91AS HFP.N NAGE t"NU NY YIPFRVIS!UN of 1'1IF' 1"P: IFR11: I"Eti(R'4EL HEREON, NO THAT THE PI.,1T RIVY� 'Y , A rURRELF HEWaESE A"T1[Hi THEREOF l,+"" 4, . , DATE: ""M _. b8 E.,. M I LL IVOI� M'111C1t summit U0 •• '�+ry�wn r ]00 E. EVERGREEN AVENHE. ARLINGTON HFIGIITS. ILI.I4015 BARRMTON ENCCi EFiN6 — 413 EAST MAIN STREET — BARRM ISTON, LLNOIS 60010— 13121 382-1037 _Ex h'1b1+ A Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: DAVID STRAHL, ACTING VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 SUBJECT: PZ -17-15 / 1958-2036 W. ALGONQUIN ROAD / ZMA, CU, VARIATIONS The Subject Property is located on the north side of Algonquin Road and is zoned R -X Single -Family Residence District. The property was developed under Cook County regulations in the 1960's and was annexed into the Village of Mount Prospect in 1974. Upon annexation, the property was classified R -X Single -Family Residence District. The property measures nineteen and one half (19.5) acres in area and contains fourteen (14) multi- family apartment buildings, a leasing building and related improvements. The Petitioner is proposing a substantial rehabilitation of the Mount Prospect Greens Apartment complex by replacing the tennis courts with a new clubhouse, in -ground pool, maintenance garage and parking lot. Besides the new construction, the Petitioner also intends to renovate the existing leasing building into a fitness and laundry facility and remodel thirteen (13) of the existing apartment buildings. The project requires rezoning, conditional use, and variation approval. The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the requests on Thursday, August 27, 2015 and by a vote of 7-0, recommended approval of the following motions: A. Zoning Map Amendment from R -X Single -Family Residence to R-4 Multi -Family Residence. B. Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of sixteen (16) primary structures and two (2) accessory structures. C. Variation to allow 2,474.25 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre). D. Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of 54.8 %. E. Variation to allow 586 overall parking spaces. F. Variation to allow existing parking lot landscaping, setbacks and lighting to remain as is, subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their September 15, 2015 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. William J. gooney, AICP \\Vfl WhI hcd$TLAMPIauniag & Zoning COMM\P&Z 2015M Hage Mauagcr MCmOs\PZ-17-15 1758-2136 W Algonquin Road (ZMA, CU, VAR).docx Village of Mount Prospect 1 "„11117 Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ -17-15 LOCATION: 1958-2036 W. Algonquin Road PETITIONER: BWIP MPG OWNER, LLC OWNER: BWIP MPG OWNER, LLC PARCEL #s: 08-15-400-069-1001, 08-15-400-069-1002, 08-15-400-069-1003, 08-15-400-069-1004, 08-15-400-069-1005, 08-15-400-069-1006, 08-15-400-069-1007, 08-15-400-069-1008, 08-15-400-069-1009, 08-15-400-069-1010, 08-15-400-069-1011, 08-15-400-069-1012, 08-15-400-069-1013,08-15-400-069-1014 LOT SIZE: 19.54 Acres ZONING: RX Single -Family Residential LAND USE: Multi -Family Residential REQUESTS: - Zoning Map Amendment from R -X to R-4 - Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development - Variations to lot coverage, density, parking, landscaping, setbacks and lighting) LOCATION MAP Village of Mount Prospect JJ Mo"r`llwaix Community Development Department MEMORANDUM VA 1 TO: MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON FROM: CONSUELO ANDRADE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: AUGUST 18, 2015 HEARING DATE: AUGUST 18, 2015 SUBJECT: PZ -17-15 / 195 8-203 6 W. ALGONQUIN ROAD / ZMA, CU, VARIATIONS BACKGROUND A public hearing has been scheduled for the August 27, 2015 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by BWIP MPG OWNER, LLC (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 1958-2036 W. Algonquin Road (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking a zoning map amendment from R -X to R-4, a conditional use for a planned unit development, and variations to the density, lot coverage, parking, landscaping, and lighting requirements. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the July 8, 2015 edition of the Daily Herald newspaper. In addition, the Petitioner completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and Staff posted a public hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is located on the north side of Algonquin Road and is zoned R -X Single -Family Residence District. The Subject Property borders the R -X Single -Family Residence District to the north and west, the R-4 Multi -Family Residential District to the east, and B-3 Community Shopping District to the south. The Subject Property was developed under Cook County regulations in the 1960's and was annexed into the Village of Mount Prospect in 1974 as part of a larger annexation. Upon annexation, the Subject Property was automatically classified R -X Single -Family Residence District. The Subject Property measures nineteen and one half (19.5) acres in area and contains fourteen (14) multi -family apartment buildings, a leasing building and related improvements. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner is proposing a substantial rehabilitation of the Mount Prospect Greens Apartment complex by replacing the tennis courts with a new clubhouse, in -ground pool maintenance garage and parking lot. Besides the new construction, the Petitioner also intends to renovate the existing leasing building into a fitness and laundry facility and remodel thirteen (13) of the existing apartment buildings. The project requires rezoning, conditional use, and variation approval. The various elements of the proposal are outlined below. Rezoning- The Subject Property's land use is nonconforming as multi -family residential is not permitted land use in the R -X District. The Petitioner is seeking to rezone the Subject Property from R -X to R-4 to bring the land use to code compliance and allow for the proposed improvements. PZ -17-15 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 27, 2015 Page 3 Densi - The Subject Property consists of 344 dwelling units and provides 2,474.25 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre), which is nonconforming. The Village Code requires a minimum of 2,700 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit (16 units per acre) in the R-4 Districts. The Petitioner does not seek to increase the number of dwelling units and is seeking a variation to density to allow the existing number of apartment units remain. Site Plan- The Subject Property currently has two access drives from Algonquin Road. The proposed improvements will maintain the existing curb cuts, but will modify the easternmost access drive to a boulevard design. The site plan indicates the construction of a clubhouse, garage, in -ground pool, and shed. The proposed new structures will increase the overall number of structures from fifteen (15) to eighteen (18); sixteen (16) primary buildings and two (2) accessory structures. Conditional use approval for a planned unit development (PUD) to allow more than one principal building is required. The clubhouse will measure two -stories in height and 5,040 square feet of gross floor area. The first floor will include a leasing office, lobby, and business center. The second floor will include a private party room, roof terrace, and movie theatre room. The elevation plan indicate the building materials will include HardiePlank siding and an asphalt shingle roof. A recreational area consisting of an in -ground pool, playground and seating areas will be provided north of the clubhouse. The site plan also indicates a new 882 square foot detached garage and 100 square foot storage shed will be constructed. The garage will store maintenance and landscape equipment for the property. The storage shed will house pumps and equipment associated with the pool. The building materials for the garage and storage shed will be HardiePlank siding. Setbacks- The site plan indicates the building setbacks would comply with the minimum yards required in the R-4 District. However, the parking lot setbacks would not. The existing parking lot setbacks are approximately four feet (4') along the west lot line, two feet (2') along the north lot line, two and a half feet (2.5') along the east lot line, and no setback along the south lot line. The proposed improvements would not change the existing setbacks. The Petitioner seeks a variation to allow the existing parking lot setbacks to remain. Parking — The existing and proposed parking is nonconforming. The parking requirements for multi -family dwellings are based on the number of bedroom and overall number of dwelling units. Village Code requires two (2) parking spaces per one (1) and two (2) bedroom dwelling units and two and a half (2 '/2 ) parking spaces per three (3) or more bedroom dwelling units. In addition, one (1) guest parking space is required for every ten (10) required parking spaces. The Subject Property currently consists of 120 one bedroom, 218 two bedroom, and six (6) three bedroom dwelling units, which requires 760 overall parking spaces, including guest parking. The Plat of Survey indicates there are currently 556 parking spaces. The proposed improvements include the replacement of the existing tennis courts with parking, which would increase the overall parking spaces to 586, leaving the property 174 parking spaces short of meeting code requirements. The Petitioner seeks a variation to the parking requirement to allow 586 overall parking spaces. The Petitioner requires parking passes for the tenants and limits the passes to one (1) for one bedroom units and two (2) for two and three bedroom units. In addition, the Petitioner submitted parking counts that indicate no more than seventy one percent (71%) of the overall parking was utilized during the times studied. Lot Coverage- The existing overall lot coverage is approximately 52.7% and is nonconforming. The current RX zoning designation allows up to thirty five (35%) lot coverage. The R4 District allows a maximum of fifty percent (50%) overall lot coverage. The proposed improvements will increase the overall lot coverage to 54.8 %. The Petitioner seeks a variation to allow a 54.8% overall lot coverage. PZ -17-15 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 27, 2015 Page 4 Landscaping & Li hg ting - The proposed improvements require the Subject Property to comply with the Village Code's development requirements, including parking lot lighting and landscaping. The proposed plans indicate lighting and landscaping will be provided only for the new improvements. The remainder of the Subject Property will remain as is, which does not comply with the landscape or parking lot lighting requirements. The Petitioner seeks Variation approval to allow the remainder of the Subject Property to remain as is. Comments from other departments Other departments reviewed the proposal and did not object to the request. However, the Petitioner shall keep in mind the following: Engineering- Stormwater detention will have to be provided for the proposed improvements including the new buildings, pavement (including the parking lot replacing the tennis courts) and areas disturbed and/or regraded. The additional lot coverage shall not have an adverse impact on the receiving storm sewer systems or adjacent properties. The rate of stormwater leaving the site under the proposed conditions shall not be greater than fifty percent (50%) of the lot area. Police & Fire- Providing access from both the east and west sides of the courtyard is crucial to emergency response. The fire lane is currently accessible from both the east and west sides of the courtyard. The proposed improvements would provide access to the fire lane only from the west side, which would increase response times to buildings on the east and will make the egress of large fire and police equipment from the fire lane extremely difficult. An eastern access to the interior/courtyard fire lane shall be provided from the parking lot. The driveways accessing_ the site's interior fire lanes shall have curbs that allow for fire department access from all directions. Site security is a concern with the addition of the pool. The police department would like appropriate security measures in place after hours to reduce the risk of trespassing and accidents. In addition, lighting in the area should be sufficient to make reasonable observations under the cover of darkness while not being intrusive to tenants in nearby buildings. A complete review of the plans will be performed as part of the building permit review process. These requirements are included in an effort to ensure the Petitioner is aware of the requirements and submits the necessary documentation. A complete set of detailed plans, including landscape and photometric plan, will be required to be submitted for review and approval at time of building permit application COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the property as multi -family residential. MAP AMENDMENT STANDARDS The standards for map amendments are listed in Section 14.203.D.8.a of the Village Zoning Ordinance. When a Map Amendment is proposed, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in each specific case with respect to, but not limited to, the following matters: • The compatibility with existing uses and zoning classifications of property within the general area of the property in question; • The compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification; PZ -17-15 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 27, 2015 Page 5 • The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing and proposed zoning classifications; and • Consistency with the trend of development in the general area of the property in question, and the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request to rezone the Subject Property and finds that the standards for a map amendment have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's response to the standards. Rezoning to the R4 Multi - Family Residence District would be in keeping with the existing and proposed use of the property. The R4 zoning designation will be consistent with the Village Comprehensive Plan's designation. In addition, the rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding properties. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The standards for approving a planned unit development are listed in Section 14.504 of the Village Zoning Ordinance. The section contains specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Planned Unit Development. These standards relate to: • The proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is to be located; • The principal use in the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the recommendations of the comprehensive plan of the village for the area containing the subject site; • The proposed planned unit development is in the public interest and is consistent with the purposes of this zoning ordinance. • That the streets have been designed to avoid inconvenient or unsafe access to the planned unit development and for the surrounding neighborhood; and that the development does not create an excessive burden on public parks, recreation areas, schools, and other public facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned unit development. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request to allow a planned unit development (PUD) and finds that the standards for a PUD have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's response to the standards. A PUD is appropriate for the site based on the existing conditions of the Subject Property and the proposed improvements, which would consist of accessory uses that will support the residents. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for variations and finds that the standards for a variation have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's responses to the standards. The subject property is unique and a hardship exists due to the physical characteristics. The property measures over nineteen (19) acres in area and is irregular in shape. The property was developed under Cook County regulations. The existing improvements limit the buildable area to the interior courtyard, which provides the majority of the green space. The proposed PZ -17-15 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting August 27, 2015 Page 6 improvement would maintain the existing density, bring the parking closer to code compliance, and provide amenities to the residents. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds that the rezoning, conditional use, and variation standards as listed in the Zoning Ordinance have been met and that granting such requests would be in the best interest of the Village. Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motions: A. Zoning Map Amendment from R -X Single -Family Residence to R-4 Multi -Family Residence. B. Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of sixteen (16) primary structures and two (2) accessory structures. C. Variation to allow 2,474.25 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre). D. Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of 54.8 %. E. Variation to allow 586 overall parking spaces. F. Variation to allow existing parking lot landscaping, setbacks and lighting to remain as is, subject to the following conditions: Submittal of a Plat of Subdivision creating a single lot of record in compliance with Chapter 15 of the Village Code for review and approval. 2. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Vocon, dated July 30, 2015; 3. Obtaining permits from the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) for any work within Algonquin Road; 4. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings, including site work, utilities, storm water detention, for review and approval by the Village. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, stormwater detention, fire prevention, lighting, sign; and building regulations; and 6. A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: �� William J. Cooney, AICP Director of Community Development MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -17-15 PROPERTY ADDRESS: PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: Hearing Date: August 27, 2015 1958- 2036 W. Algonquin Rd. BWIP MPG Owner LLC July 8, 2015 PIN NUMBER: 08-15400-069-1001, 08-15400-069-1002, 08-15400-069- 1003, 08-15-400-069-1004, 08-15-400-069-1005, 08-15- 400-069-1006, 08-15-400-069-1007, 08-15-400-069-1008, 08-15400-069-1009, 08-15400-069-1010, 08-15-400-069- 1011, 08-15-400-069-1012, 08-15-400-069-1013, 08-15- 400-069-1014 REQUEST: -ZMA from RX- R4 -CU for PUD -Variations to lot coverage, density, parking, landscaping, setbacks and lighting MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: INTERESTED PARTY: Thomas Fitzgerald William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chair Agostino Filippone - Associate Sharon Otteman Consuelo Andrade, Deputy Director of Community Development BWIP MPG Owner LLC I Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Commissioner Beattie made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 23rd, 2015 meeting; Commissioner Youngquist seconded the motion. The minutes were approved 7-0. After hearing two (2) additional cases, Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ -17-15 1958-2036 W. Algonquin. Ms. Andrade stated that the Petitioner for PZ -17-15 is seeking a zoning change from R -X to R-4, conditional use for a planned unit development, and variations to the density, lot coverage, parking, landscaping, and lighting requirements for the property located at 1958-2036 W. Algonquin Road known as Mount Prospect Greens. Ms. Andrade stated the Subject Property is located on the north side of Algonquin Road and is zoned R -X Single -Family Residence District. The Subject Property borders the R -X Single -Family Residence Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -17-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman District to the north and west, the R-4 Multi -Family Residential District to the east, and B-3 Community Shopping District to the south. Ms. Andrade stated that the Subject Property measures nineteen and one half (19.5) acres in area and contains fourteen (14) multi -family apartment buildings, a leasing building and related improvements. She further explained the Subject Property was developed under Cook County regulations in the 1960's and was annexed into the Village of Mount Prospect in 1974. Upon annexation, the Subject Property was automatically classified R -X Single -Family Residence District. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner is proposing a substantial rehabilitation of the complex by replacing the tennis courts with parking and constructing a new clubhouse, in -ground pool, maintenance garage and shed. Besides the new construction, the Petitioner also intends to renovate the existing leasing building into a fitness and laundry facility and remodel thirteen (13) of the existing apartment buildings. Ms. Andrade explained the proposed improvements trigger zoning compliance and requires rezoning, conditional use, and variation approval. The Subject Property's land use is nonconforming as multi- family residential is not a permitted land use in the R -X District. She further explained The Petitioner is seeking to rezone the Subject Property from R -X to R-4 to bring the land use to code compliance and allow for the proposed improvements. Ms. Andrade explained the Subject Property consists of 344 dwelling units and provides 2,474 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre), which is nonconforming. She further commented that the Village Code requires a minimum of 2,700 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit (16 units per acre) in the R-4 Districts. The Petitioner does not seek to increase the number of dwelling units and is seeking a variation to density to allow the existing number of apartment units remain. Ms. Andrade stated the proposed new structures will increase the overall number of structures from fifteen (15) to eighteen (18); sixteen (16) primary buildings and two (2) accessory structures. She further explained that a Conditional use approval for a planned unit development (PUD) to allow more than one principal building is required to allow the clubhouse, garage, and shed. Ms. Andrade explained the existing overall lot coverage is approximately 52.7% and is nonconforming. The current RX zoning designation allows up to thirty five (35%) lot coverage. She further stated The R4 District allows a maximum of fifty percent (50%) overall lot coverage. The proposed improvements will increase the overall lot coverage to 54.8 % and the Petitioner seeks a variation to allow a 54.8% overall lot coverage. Ms. Andrade stated that the existing and proposed parking is nonconforming. She explained the Plat of Survey indicates there are currently 556 parking spaces. The proposed improvements include the replacement of the existing tennis courts with parking, which would increase the overall parking spaces to 586, leaving the property 174 parking spaces short of meeting code requirements. The Petitioner seeks a variation to the parking requirement. Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -17-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Ms. Andrade stated in addition, the Petitioner submitted parking counts that indicate no more than seventy one percent (71%) of the overall parking was utilized during the times studied. Ms. Andrade stated the site plan indicates the building setbacks would comply with the minimum yards required in the R-4 District. However, the parking lot setbacks would not. She further explained the existing parking lot setbacks are approximately four feet (4') along the west lot line, two feet (2') along the north lot line, two and a half feet (2.5') along the east lot line, and no setback along the south lot line. She further commented that the proposed improvements would not change the existing setbacks. The Petitioner seeks a variation to allow the existing parking lot setbacks to remain. Ms. Andrade commented regarding the proposed lighting and landscaping improvements. She stated the proposed plans indicate lighting and landscaping will be provided only for the new improvements. The remainder of the Subject Property will remain as is, which does not comply with the landscape or parking lot lighting requirements. She stated the Petitioner seeks Variation approval to allow the remainder of the Subject Property to remain as is. Ms. Andrade summarized the standards for a map amendment as the following: • The compatibility with existing uses and zoning classifications of property within the general area of the property in question; • The compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification; • The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing and proposed zoning classifications; and • Consistency with the trend of development in the general area of the property in question, and the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request to rezone the Subject Property and finds that the standards for a map amendment have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's response to the standards. She further stated that rezoning to the R4 Multi -Family Residence District would be in keeping with the existing and proposed use of the property. The R4 zoning designation will be consistent with the Village Comprehensive Plan's designation. In addition, the rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding properties. Ms. Andrade summarized the standards for a planned unit development as the following: • The proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is to be located; • The principal use in the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the recommendations of the comprehensive plan of the village for the area containing the subject site; • The proposed planned unit development is in the public interest and is consistent with the purposes of this zoning ordinance. • That the streets have been designed to avoid inconvenient or unsafe access to the planned unit development and for the surrounding neighborhood; and that the development does not create an Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -17-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman H excessive burden on public parks, recreation areas, schools, and other public facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned unit development. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff reviewed the Petitioner's request to allow a planned unit development (PUD) and finds that the standards for a PUD have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's response to the standards. Ms. Andrade summarized the standards for a variation as the following: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Ms. Andrade stated that Staff reviewed the Petitioner's request for variations and finds that the standards for a variation have been met, as set forth in the Petitioner's responses to the standards. She further commented the Subject Property is unique and a hardship exists due to the physical characteristics. The property measures over nineteen (19) acres in area and is irregular in shape. The property was developed under Cook County regulations. She stated the existing improvements limit the buildable area to the interior courtyard, which provides the majority of the green space. The proposed improvement would maintain the existing density, bring the parking closer to code compliance, and provide amenities to the residents. Ms. Andrade stated Staff finds the rezoning, conditional use, and variation standards as listed in the Zoning Ordinance have been met and that granting such requests would be in the best interest of the Village. She further stated that Staff recommends the Planning & Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motions: A. Zoning Map Amendment from R -X Single -Family Residence to R-4 Multi -Family Residence. B. Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of sixteen (16) primary structures and two (2) accessory structures. C. Variation to allow 2,474.25 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre). D. Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of 54.8 %. E. Variation to allow 586 overall parking spaces. F. Variation to allow existing parking lot landscaping, setbacks and lighting to remain as is, subject to the following conditions: Submittal of a Plat of Subdivision creating a single lot of record in compliance with Chapter 15 of the Village Code for review and approval. 2. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Vocon, dated July 30, 2015; 3. Obtaining permits from the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) for any work within Algonquin Road; Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -17-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman 4. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings, including site work, utilities, storm water detention, for review and approval by the Village. 5. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, storm water detention, fire prevention, lighting, sign; and building regulations; and A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. Ms. Andrade stated that other village departments reviewed the proposal and did not object to the request and further explained the Village Comprehensive Plan designates the property as multi -family residential. Ms. Andrade stated the Village Board's decision is final for this case. Commissioner Beattie asked if additional fire lanes from the eastern access drive will be added to the conditions. Ms. Andrade responded that Staff was recommending a condition of approval to comply will all applicable requirements, including a fire lane;otherwise the Petitioner will have to request a variation if they want to deviate from the requirements. Chairman Donnelly swore in Jeff Gibbon, architect for the project, 3142 Prospect Avenue Cleveland, Ohio. Mr. Gibbon stated the new owner, Paul Keibler, purchased the Subject Property in December 2014. He further stated that all of the units are getting renovated and the site improvements are to correct functional deficiencies. Mr. Gibbons gave some brief descriptions of the challenges the site offers. He explained there isn't a clear path navigating through the complex. He also stated that they are looking to include amenities that the site is lacking. He further explained that Staff did a great job explaining the project in detail and that he can answer any follow up questions the board has. Chairman Donnelly asked why only 13 of the 14 buildings are getting renovated. Mr. Gibbons stated that one of the buildings had been recently renovated in 2011 due to a fire. Chairman Donnelly asked what the reasoning for the rezoning is. Mr. Gibbons stated that the site has been multi -family since the 1960's and would need to rezone the property in order make significant changes. Ms. Andrade stated the property is currently nonconforming and is subject to the Village's nonconforming provisions. She further explained, in the event the property is damaged more than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement value they would be subject to bring it up to the RX zoning standards Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -17-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman which doesn't allow multi -family residential. She explained rezoning to the R4 would allow the Petitioner to remodel and reconstruct as multi -family. Chairman Donnelly asked if the Petitioner could replace all the units after the renovations with the new zoning. Ms. Andrade responded the units could be replaced but any changes or amendments to the PUD would need to be brought before the board for review and approval. She further explained the variation will allow the current density to remain. Chairman Donnelly clarified that if the variations get approved the petitioner can't decide to tear down the buildings and rebuild with the same amount of units. He also asked the Petitioner if they agreed to the conditions set forth by Staff. The Petitioner said they understand and agree with the conditions. Commissioner Mizwicki asked if the entire complex is occupied. Chairman Donnelly swore in Paul Kiebler 30195 Chagrin Boulevard. Mr. Kiebler stated the complex is 96.8% leased. Commissioner Mizwicki asked how the buildings will get renovated. Mr. Kiebler stated that some of the renovations are done with the units being occupied. He also explained that if a significant amount of work is being done they don't renew leases until the work is completed and relocate the tenant to another unit in the meantime. Commissioner Mizwicki asked what types of renovations will take place. Mr. Kiebler stated that it will be a full remodel including new floors, paint, kitchens, and appliances. Commissioner Beattie asked what the time frame for the project is. Mr. Kiebler stated that it depends on the leases. He stated about twenty five (25) units become vacant every month. He stated they are hoping to get the project done with in twelve (12) months. He further explained they plan on renovating 20-30 units a month. Commissioner Kueter asked if they are planning on keeping majority of the current tenants in their same units. Mr. Kiebler stated some residents want to stay in their unit and will be relocated for the three days while the renovation takes place; he also said majority of the tenants just pack their stuff and move to a new unit that has already been renovated. He stated they have done over 22,000 units and the process is seamless. Commissioner Kueter asked if they own any other properties in town. Mr. Kiebler stated they took ownership of the Timberlake, Alpine, and Redwood complexes in town. Commissioner Mizwicki asked if the rent is raised after the renovation. Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -17-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman Mr. Kiebler stated the rents are usually raised $100 up to $600 if the renovation was substantial. He stated they have about at sixty percent (60%) renewal rate when the renovations are done. Commissioner Kueter asked what the average cost of rent is. Mr. Kiebler said before the renovations average rent is about $914 and that he expects rent to be about $1300 after the renovations. He gave a brief description of the new amenities the project will bring to the complex. There was general discussion between the board and the Petitioner regarding the value this will bring to the community. Chairman Donnelly asked if there were any citizens that wanted to comment on the case. Hearing none, he closed the public portion of the hearing and brought the discussion back to the board. Hearing no further discussion, Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Kueter to approve the following motion: A. Zoning Map Amendment from R -X Single -Family Residence to R-4 Multi -Family Residence. B. Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of sixteen (16) primary structures and two (2) accessory structures. C. Variation to allow 2,474.25 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre). D. Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of 54.8 %. E. Variation to allow 586 overall parking spaces. F. Variation to allow existing parking lot landscaping, setbacks and lighting to remain as is, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submittal of a Plat of Subdivision creating a single lot of record in compliance with Chapter 15 of the Village Code for review and approval. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Vocon, dated July 30, 2015; 3. Obtaining permits from the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) for any work within Algonquin Road; 4. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings, including site work, utilities, storm water detention, for review and approval by the Village. 5. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, storm water detention, fire prevention, lighting, sign; and building regulations; and 6. A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Filippone, Fitzgerald, Beattie, Youngquist, Kueter, Mizwicki, Donnelly NAYS: None Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -17-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman The vote was approved 7-0 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. Commissioner Younguist made a motion seconded by Commissioner Filippone and the meeting was adjourned at 9:14 pm. Jenna 'I' Moder Jenna Moder, Administrative Assistant Planning and Zoning Meeting- August 27, 2015 PZ -17-15 Joseph Donnelly, Chairman VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Community Development Department — Planning Division 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone: (847) 818-5328 Fax: (847) 818-5329 Zoning Request Application Mount OFFICIAL USE ONLY (To be completed by Village Staff) Case Number: P&Z - - Date of Submission: Hearing Date: Development Name/Address: I. SUBJECT PROPERTY Address(es): 1958 W Algonquin Road Zoning District (s): R -X Property Area: 851,142sf (19.54 ACRES) Sq.Ft. Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 08-15-400-069 Adjacent Zoning Districts: Adjacent Land Uses: To the North: R -X To the North: MULTI -FAMILY To the South: B-3 To the South: COMMERCIAL To the East: R-4 To the East: MULTI -FAMILY To the West: R-4 To the West: MULTI -FAMILY II. ZONING REQUEST(S) (Check all that apply) ❑X Conditional Use: For Conditional Use to Provide 16 Primary Buildings & 2 Accessory Structures ® Variation(s): From Chapter 14, Section(s) §14.1304.A, §14.1304.0 , §14.2224 ❑X Zoning Map Amendment: Rezone From R -X to R-4 ❑ Zoning Text Amendment: Section(s) ❑ Other: Official Use Only (To be completed by Village Staff): ❑ Administrative, ❑ P&Z Final, ❑ Village Board Final III. SUMMARY OF REQUESTED ACTION(S) See attached Summary Letter which outlines the requested actions and scope of Improvements proposed for the Mount Prospect Greens Apartments Hours of Operation: V. PROPERTY OWNER 0 Check if Same as Applicant Name: Corporation: Address: Work Phone: Cell Phone: Fax: Email: VI. EXISTING SITE INFORMATION IV. APPLICANT (all correspondence will be sent to the applicant) Name: Paul Kiebler Corporation: BWIP MPG Owner LLC Interest In Land Use: Property: Owner 51.68' Feet, Inches (e.g. owner, buyer, developer, lessee, architect, attorney, etc...) Address: 1958 W. ALGONQUIN ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 Work Phone: (216) 468-0050 Cell Phone: Fax: Email: pkiebler@apm-mgt.com V. PROPERTY OWNER 0 Check if Same as Applicant Name: Corporation: Address: Work Phone: Cell Phone: Fax: Email: VI. EXISTING SITE INFORMATION Building Size: 160,672sf (footprints) Sq.Ft. Tenant Space Size: 344 apartments Sq.Ft. Land Use: Multi -Family Building Setbacks: (N) 51.68' Feet, Inches (S) 74.70' Feet, Inches (E) 50.25' Feet, Inches (W) 50.28' Feet, Inches Lot Coverage: 448,415sf (52.7%) (Overall Impervious) Sq. Ft. Parking Provided: 545 Standard 11 Accessible VII. PROPOSED SITE INFORMATION Building Size: 165,000sf (footprints) Sq.Ft. Tenant Space Size: 344 apartments Sq.Ft. Land Use: Multi -Family Building Setbacks: (N) unchanged Feet, Inches (S) unchanged Feet, Inches (E) unchanged Feet, Inches (W) unchanged Feet, Inches Lot Coverage: 466,000sf (54.8%) (Overall Impervious) Sq.Ft. Parking Provided: 574 Standard 12 Accessible E•3 VIII. DEVELOPMENT/PROJECT PROFESSIONALS 1. Developer Name: BWIP MPG Owner, LLC Address: 1958 W, Algonquin Rd, Mount Prospect, IL 60056Email: Phone: (216) 468-0050 Fax: 2. Architect Name: Vocon Address: 3142 Prospect Ave, Cleveland, OH 44115 Email: jeff.gibbon@vocon.com Phone: (216) 588-0800 Fax: 3. Engineer Name: RWG Engineering, LLC Address: 975 E. 22nd St, Wheaton, IL 60189 Email: Phone: (630) 480-7889 Fax: E•3 4. Landscape Architect Name: Hawthorn Landscaping Address: Email: Phone: (815) 823-6127 Fax: 5. Surveyor Name: JLH Land Surveying, Inc Address: 7222 Courtwright Dr, Plainfield IL 60586 Email: johngjlhsurvey.com Phone: (815) 729-4000 Fax: 6. Attorney Name: Address: Email: Phone: Fax: In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owneyo e property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on theprbpert during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all infofy� on provided herpil`��) materials submitted in association with this application are true and accurate ,-, ��/ Applicant: Date (Signature) Paul Kiebler (Print Name) 5 , o r\ cJu - If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application and the associated supporting material. Property Owner: Date: (Signature) (Print Name) A vrocon. July 30, 2015 Ms. Consuelo Andrade Senior Planner Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: Mount Prospect Greens Apartments Master Plan Renovation 1958 W. Algonquin Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 clevelland new york vocon.com 3142 Prospect Avenue 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 2404 Cleveland, Ohio 44115 New York, NY 10017 216.588.0800 p 646.865.1200 p Planning and Zoning Review Parcel Pins: 08-15-400-069-1001, 08-15-400-069-1002, 08-15-400-069-1003, 08-15-400-069-1004, 08-15-400-069-1005, 08-15-400-069-1006, 08-15-400-069-1007, 08-15-400-069-1008, 08-15-400-069-1009, 08-15-400-069-1010, 08-15-400-069-1011, 08-15-400-069-1012, 08-15-400-069-1013, 08-15-400-069-1014 Dear Ms. Andrade, We respectfully submit this letter and the attached drawings for Planning and Zoning Review with regards to the Proposed Master Plan Development of the Mount Prospect Greens Apartments. This submission follows the Preliminary Meeting with the Village Staff on April 7, 2015, a Planning Submission for Preliminary Review on April 30, 2015, and several coordination meetings that have taken place more recently. Our submission is in anticipation of the August 2711 Planning and Zoning Public Hearing. BWIP MPG Owner, LLC is proposing strategic Master Plan Renovations for the Mount Prospect Greens Apartment Community to improve the property's appeal as a premier residential address and modern apartment community within the market. As part of this Renovation and Modernization effort, the following scope of work is being considered: Scope of Improvements • Site Entry Modifications including a new entrance Boulevard and new main Parking Area which will greatly improve the appearance of the property as part of the new entry site experience leading to the proposed New Clubhouse Building and Tenant Park and Recreation areas. • New Clubhouse Building Construction: a new 2 story 3,900 sf building is proposed at the north end of the new parking area and will serve as the focal point for visitors and tenants alike. This proposed new accessory building will include the new Leasing & Management Office for the property as well as a large central lobby, a small business center, a small private movie theater, party room and roof terrace overlooking the new pool and park. The movie theater and party room amenities can be reserved by apartment tenants only. Fitness Building: the existing accessory building on the site, the 2,875sf Leasing Building, is outdated and in need of renovation. As part of the Master Plan site renovations, this building will be completely reconfigured as a tenant Fitness and Laundry Building for use by apartment tenants. Its central location in the middle of the community suits it perfectly to support these functions within the community. The new floorplan includes new restrooms, a laundry room, lounge area, vending area, a fitness room and yoga studio. Minor exterior improvements are anticipated to support the new floorplan including new window and door locations. The renovation work for the Fitness Building has been submitted to the Village for Construction Permit on Monday June 8, 2015. • New Park Areas: a new Tenant Park area is proposed at the center of the property, sitting between the New Clubhouse and Fitness Buildings, and becomes the heart of the proposed Tenant Amenity improvements. The proposed Park Area includes a new lap pool, playground, and outdoor seating areas. In addition, existing concrete walkways will be repaired and extended to improve apartment community circulation to the new Tenant Park. vocon . partners • New Utility Garage Construction: a new 882 sf garage is proposed adjacent to the Fitness Building which will support maintenance and landscaping upkeep on the apartments and property. Apartment Renovations: Permit Application was made for interior Apartment Renovations on May 24, 2015. Renovations are planned for all apartment in 13 of the 14 existing apartment buildings (305 or 344 apartments). Building 5, recently re -constructed in 2011 after a fire, will receive only upkeep and maintenance. Renovations for the remaining 305 apartments include the addition of 142 dens to selected exiting 2 Bedroom Units as well as new millwork and appliances, new plumbing and electrical fixtures, new finishes, and general upkeep and maintenance throughout. Appendix 3 of this application includes a detailed breakdown of the units which will be converted from (2) to (3) bedroom units. Summary of Requests BWIP has recently purchased a total of 5 multi -family properties within the Village of Mount Prospect totaling 1,075 apartments on over 50 acres of land and looks forward to partnering with members of the Community Development staff as it invests in the community and undertakes upgrades for each of its properties. Mount Prospect Greens, originally constructed between 1965 and 1966, presents several existing conditions that are in non-conformance with the current Village Planning Code and must to be addressed before any new construction can move forward. BWIP is eager to make improvements that will make this property a leader on the current market. The applicant anticipates moving forward with the investments outlined above but faces several practical difficulties due to the age and existing configurations that exist on the property. To accomplish the proposed scope of work for this property, the applicant is seeking Rezoning of the property, a Conditional Use to allow a Planned Unit Development (PUD), and anticipates (4) Variances as follows. Please also refer to Appendix 1 "Response to Application Standards": 1. Zoning Map Amendment To rezone the property from R -X to R-4 Current Zoning Map Designation §14.802 R -X (Single Family) Proposed Zoning Map Designation §14.1302 R-4 (Multi -Family) At the recommendation of the Village, the applicant is requesting that the subject property (19.5 acres in size) be rezoned from R -X (Single Family) to R-4 (Multi -Family) to bring the parcel's zoning designation in line with its past, current, and future use as a multi -family property. The existing multi -family buildings on this property as well as the multi -family buildings on neighboring properties have been in place for at least 50 years, but are not allowed by the current Single -Family zoning designation. Rezoning the property to Multi -Family is in keeping with the existing use of the site as well as the existing character and use of the neighborhood. Note that the Variances to the Village Code being requested herein are relative to R-4 designation requirements. The variance requests herein address existing non -conforming discrepancies that otherwise impede the scope of proposed work from moving forward and will allow the proposed new property improvements to proceed. 2. Conditional Use of a Planned Use Development (PUD) (§14.1304.E.1) Conditional Use to Provide (16) Primary Buildings & (2) Accessory Structures Village Code Regulation §14.1304.E.1 Two of more multi -family units may be located on the same lot only as part of an approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Existing Condition (Non -Conforming) The lot currently contains (15) Primary Buildings consisting of (14) Multi -Family Buildings and (1) Accessory Amenity Building. By §14.1304.E.1, the existing condition is non -conforming and a (PUD) is required for any further development to occur on this site. Proposed Condition The proposed scope of improvements would add (3) new amenities to the property for a total of (18) structures: (16) Primary Buildings and (2) Accessory Structures. The addition of these (1) new Accessory Building and (2) new Accessory Structures to the existing property will further improve the current and future use, quality, and function of the apartment community as a leader in the market. The proposed (3) new Accessory Buildings are: a) Clubhouse Building: This new 2 story 3,900 sf Clubhouse (2,270sf footprint) will host the Leasing & Management Offices for the property. The building also provides a new Tenant Lobby, Business Center, private movie theater, and private party room which overlooks the new pool. This new building is envisioned to serve as the cultural and functional anchor for the community. b) Maintenance Garage: This new 1 story 882sf garage structure will house maintenance and landscaping equipment for the property. This function is currently handled in an under -sized garage area within the existing Leasing Building. This Building is undergoing a complete conversion to become the Fitness Building and the garage area, in addition to being inadequate in size, is no longer available for this use. c) Pool Equipment Structure: This new 1 story 100sf structure will house pumps and equipment associated with the new pool. To accomplish the scope of improvements, we are requesting approval for Conditional Use of a PUD to provide a total of (16) Primary Buildings & (2) Accessory Structures which will allow us to the add Amenity functions outlined herein to the site. 3. Bulk Regulations (§14.1304.A) To allow the existing condition of 2,475 sf of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre) to remain Village Code Regulation §14.1304 A maximum 2,700sf of lot area (16 units per acre) shall be provided for each dwelling unit. Existing Condition (Non -Conforming, Unchanged with Proposed Renovations) The existing lot size is 851,142 sf (19.54 acres). There are currently 344 apartments within the 14 existing apartment buildings to remain. The lot size and apartment quantities are unchanged by the proposed scope of work, but do not comply with current Village Zoning Code requirements for Bulk Regulations. 851,142sf / 344 Units = 2,475 sf of lot area is provided per unit 344 Units / 19.54 Acres = 17.6 units per acre are provided To accomplish the scope of improvements, we are requesting a variance to §14.1304.A which will allow the existing condition of 2,475 sf of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre) to remain and be provided. 4. Lot Coverage (§14.1304.C) To allow a lot coverage of 466,OOOsf (54.8% of 851,142sf) to be provided Village Code Regulation §14.1304.0 The maximum impervious surface shall not exceed 50% of the total lot area. For this site, the maximum allowable coverage area is 425,571sf (50% of 851,142sf). vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Existing Condition (Non -Conforming) Currently, the existing total area of impervious surface provided on the site exceeds that which is allowed by Village Code §14.1304.0 by an area of 22,844sf. This impervious surface area includes areas which will be removed and reconfigured by the proposed scope of renovations including the under-utilized tennis court and the one-way parking area in front of the existing Leasing Building. A summary of this impervious area is as follows: Existing Conditions Summary 224,673sf Roadways/Parking 160,672sf Building Footprints 63,070sf Walkways/Rec Areas 448,415sf Total (52.7% of total lot area) Proposed Condition The proposed scope of renovations includes the addition of a landscaped site entry and Entrance Boulevard, a new main parking area to add 30 parking spaces, and a new tenant Park at the center of the property. Additionally, (3) new building structures are included. The new impervious surface area being proposed will add parking, will increase curb appeal, and will add park and amenity areas for tenants. To accomplish the scope of improvements, 17,585 sf of new impervious surface overall is added to the site. The proposed new lot coverage area is 466,000sf or 54.8% of the total lot area. Existing Conditions Summary 232,000sf Roadways/Parking 165,000sf Building Footprints 69,000sf Walkways/Rec Areas (includes the new pool) 466,000sf Total (54.8% of total lot area) To accomplish the scope of improvements, we are requesting a variance to §14.1304.0 to allow a Lot Coverage of 466,000sf (54.8% of 851,142sf) to be provided. 5. Parking (§14.2224) To allow 596 parking spaces total (1.73 spaces/unit) to be provided under the condition that the owner continue to issue parking passes to tenants. Village Code Regulation (Multi -Family) 1— 2 Bedrooms 2 spaces per unit 3 + Bedrooms 2.5 spaces per unit Guest Parking 1 additional per 10 req'd Existing Condition (Non -Conforming) The existing parcel currently contains (14) Multi -Family buildings with a total of 344 existing apartment units and 556 existing parking spaces (1.65 spaces per unit). The quantity of existing parking spaces (556 spaces) is 205 spaces short of the minimum number required by §14.2224 for 344 multi-familiy apartments (761 spaces) and is in non- conformance with §14.2224 of the Village Code. Currently the owner requires parking passes to park on the site and makes these passes available to tenants at the following amounts: 1 pass per 1 Bedroom Unit, 2 passes per 2 & 3 Bedroom Units. For 344 apartments, there are 568 Parking Passes available. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Unit Type Parking Regulation # Units (Exst.) Parking Req'd Passes Issued 1 Bedrooms 2 spaces per unit 120 (units) 240 parking req'd 120 Passes Available 2 Bedrooms 2 spaces per unit 218 (units) 436 parking req'd 436 Passes Available 3 Bedrooms 2.5 spaces per unit 6 (units) 15 parking req'd 12 Passes Available Guest Parking 1 additional per 10 req'd 8 70 parking req'd 1 BR 1 BR 835 344 (units) 761 parking req'd 556 Parking Available 2BR 895 56 - 556 parking existing - 568 Passes Available 2BR 930 20 205 Parking Short 12 Parking short Note that of the 568 parking passes available for tenants, only 495 parking passes have been requested so far this year and historically less than 500 parking passes are issued at any given time. The existing amount of on-site parking has satisfied the demand for tenant parking - currently there is a surplus of 61 spaces which are unclaimed and unused. A parking study for the site is being completed and will be included with this submission as Appendix 4 prior to the August 2711 hearing date. The parking study will further document the patterns of use, parking demand, and surplus of parking on the site. Proposed Condition As part of the Scope of Improvements, the apartment renovations are proposed that will add dens to (142) 2 - bedroom apartment units. Apartment Mix Information Req'd Subl Sub - Unit # # Unit Total # Type Bedrooms Bedrooms Area Apts. 2 40 (Existing) (Proposed) sf 2 1 170 A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 8 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 112 B 2BR 2BR 895 56 B+ 2BR 2BR 930 20 C- 2BR 2BR 960 15 C 2BR 2 BR Den 1,040 85 D* 2BR 2 BR Den , 240 42 E 3 BR ---1 3 BR - 1,65 6 344 Parking Required Req'd Subl Sub - Guest per Total Total Unit 2 16 2224 -- ------------ 2 112 ----- 2 40 2 30 2 1 170 2 84 - ------------------- ---- ------ 2.5 15 2.5 ----- 691 70 761 u u Note: Refer to Appendix 3 for detailed Apartment Area and Mix Information Parking Passes Parking Total # Passes Passes per Apt. 1 8 1 112 -- 2--- ---112-- 2 40 2 30 2 170 2 84 ---2--- ---12- 568 The proposed site developments add 30 total new parking spaces (586 total parking spaces) on site. The Owner will continue to require parking passes for tenants at the same rates of availability: 1 pass per 1 Bedroom Unit, 2 passes per 2 & 3 Bedroom Units. 568 total possible passes will still be available after the conversion work is complete. With 586 parking spaces and only 568 possible passes available, this leaves 18 unused parking spaces for Visitors if that all of the designated parking passes have been purchased (which historically has not been the case). The designated Visitor Parking will be located in the new parking lot in front of the new Clubhouse Building. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Unit Type Parking Regulation # Units (Exst.) Parking Req'd Passes Issued 1 Bedrooms 2 spaces per unit 120 (units) 240 parking req'd 120 Passes Available 2 Bedrooms 2 spaces per unit 218 (units) 436 parking req'd 436 Passes Available 3 Bedrooms 2.5 spaces per unit 6 (units) 15 parking req'd 12 Passes Available Guest Parking 1 additional per 10 req'd 70 parking req'd 344 (units) 761 parking req'd 586 Parking Available - 586 parking proposed -568 Passes Available 175 Parking Short 18 Extra Spaces For Guest Parking To accomplish the proposed scope of improvements, we are requesting a variance to §14.2224 to allow the addition of 30 parking spaces for a total of 596 parking spaces with the condition that the owner continue to require parking passes for tenants. 6. Existing Parking Conditions To allow existing non -conforming parking lot conditions to remain Village Code Regulation §14.1304.B (Setbacks) Yard Requirements Front Yard 30' min Side Yard 10' min Rear Yard 25' min §14.2219 Parking Lot Lighting All parking lots with more than 4 spaces shall provide lighting complying with this section §14.2306 Parking Lot Landscaping 5% of the interior of a parking lot shall be devoted to planting A planting island of 120sf minimum shall be provided for every 17 parking spaces A planting island is required at the end of each row Existing Conditions (Non -Conforming, Unchanged with Proposed Renovations) The existing residential parking lot areas are located around the entire perimeter of the property along all property lines. This parking configuration, parking lighting, and parking landscaping have been in place for some time. Please note that per Request #5 above, the parking quantity on the site is currently in non-conformance with the Village Code. Existing Setbacks Existing parking setbacks vary from 2'-2" to 26'-11", but are less that the Village Code requirement in all situations. Existing Lighting Parking lighting for existing parking lot areas is accomplished with flood lights mounted to the sides of existing adjacent residential buildings. Existing Landscape Parking Islands are provided at the end of some but not all rows of parking. Interior parking islands are not provided. For 556 parking spaces, at least 33 should be provided. To accomplish the scope of improvements, we are requesting a variance to §14.1304.B, §14.2219, and §14.2306 which will allow for the existing parking configurations to remain. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application 6 We kindly request your approval of the above requests to allow the Scope of Improvements to move forward. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Very Sincerely, Jeff Gibbon Director, Vocon. Enclosure: Mount Prospect Greens Apartments, Zoning Application Drawings, dated 6/11/2015 (15x21 format) Appendix 1 — 3 (8.5x11 format) Future: Appendix 4, Parking Study, will be forwarded to the Planning Department prior to the August 2711 hearing date for inclusion in this letter. cc: Paul Kiebler, BWIP MPG Owner LLC vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application voco� 3142 Prospect new yank. 3142 Prospect Avenue 315 Madison Avenue, Suite 2404 Cleveland, Ohio 44115 New York, NY 10017 216.588.0800 p 646.865.1200 p Appendix 1 Responses to Application Standards 1. Zoning Map Amendment Request to rezone the property from R -X to R-4 (§14.1302) Standard 1: Compatibility with existing uses in the general area of the Subject Property; Response: The existing multi -family buildings on this property has been in place for at least 50 years, but are not allowed by the current Single -Family zoning designation. Properties to the North, East, and West currently have multi -family uses. The property to the south on the other side of Algonquin Road is Business. Rezoning the property to Multi -Family is in keeping with the existing use of the site as well as the existing character and use of the neighborhood. Standard 2: Compatibility with the zoning classification of property's within the general area of the Subject Property; Response: The existing multi family buildings on this property has been in place for at least 50 years, but are not allowed by the current Single -Family zoning designation. Properties to the North, East, and West currently have multi -family uses. The property to the south on the other side of Algonquin Road is Business. Rezoning the property to Multi -Family is in keeping with the existing use of the site as well as the existing character and use of the neighborhood. Standard 3: The suitability of the Subject Property with regards to the uses permitted under the property's existing zoning classification; Response: The property has existed as a successful multi family community for at least half a decade and is suitable for this use. Standard 4: Consistency with the trend of development in the general area of the Subject Property, including changes that have occurred under the existing zoning classification; Response: The existing multi family buildings on this property has been in place for at least 50 years. Properties to the North, East, and West currently have multi -family uses. The property to the south on the other side of Algonquin Road is Business. Rezoning to R-4 is consistent with the existing and future use of this site and those in the general area. Standard 5: The compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification; Response: The existing multi family buildings on this property has been in place for at least 50 years, but are not allowed by the current Single -Family zoning designation. Properties to the North, East, and West currently have multi family uses. The property to the south on the other side of Algonquin Road is Business. Rezoning to R-4 is consistent with the existing and future use of this site and the surrounding properties. Standard 6: The objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village and the impact of the proposed amendment on the said objectives; vocon.com Response: Rezoning to R-4 brings the property in line with its past, present, and future use. Rezoning will allow the property to more easily undergo improvements that are in keeping with its current use and to therefore maintain its place in the Village as one of its premier residential addresses. The improvements proposed to the property under the new zoning designation will add appropriate apartment amenity facilities as well as a new management office, and will improve the appeal of the property as a viable and attractive multi- family community as desired by the Comprehensive Plan. voco I. par nerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Standard 7: The suitability of the property in question for permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification. Response: The existing multi -family buildings on this property has been in place for at least 50 years, but are not allowed by the current Single -Family zoning designation. Multi -family use is allowed under the proposed new zoning designation. Properties to the North, East, and West currently have multi family uses. The property to the south on the other side of Algonquin Road is Business. Rezoning to R-4 is consistent with the past, existing, and future use of this site and those in the general area. 2. Conditional Use of a Planned Use Development (PUD) (§14.1304.E.1) Conditional Use to Provide (16) Primary Buildings & (2) Accessory Structures Standard 1: That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; Response: The (14) existing multi -family buildings and the (1) accessory building located on this property for at least 50 years. The Conditional Use to allow the addition of (1) new accessory building and (2) accessory structures would increase the function and appeal of the property to tenants and would provide greater support for the maintenance and management of the property. The new structures will support and are in keeping with the current existing use of the property and will not endanger the health, safety, or welfare of the general public. Standard 2: That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located; Response: The multi family buildings located on this property and elsewhere in the immediate surroundings have been in place for at least 50 years. The proposed (3) new accessory structures are located on the interior of the property and are not within immediate proximity to neighboring properties. Further, the proposed additional structures and new site alteration should both increase the curb appeal of this property as well as increase its overall value and function within the neighborhood. We expect these improvements would not diminish or impair the property values of the neighborhood. Standard 3: That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district; Response: This property has operated as a multi -family property for at least 50 year. The proposed improvements will maintain existing and normal use of this property and should not impact the normal or orderly improvement of properties in the surrounding area. Standard 4: That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided; Response: The site currently has adequate access to utilities, roads, and drainage. The proposed improvements will be accommodated by utilizing the existing utilities, access roads, and drainage systems. Please refer to the Civil Engineering plans which are included with this application. Standard 5: That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; Response: Existing curb cuts will be maintained for ingress and egress to the site. The existing number of parking passes will be maintained assuring that traffic loads will not increase. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Standard 6: That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village; Response: The Conditional Use will allow this multi -family property to more easily undergo improvements that are in keeping with its current use and to therefore maintain its place in the Village as one of its premier residential addresses. The improvements and new accessory structures proposed to the property under the Conditional Use will add new amenity facilities and management offices, and will serve to improve the appeal and function of the property as a viable and attractive multi -family community as described in the Comprehensive Plan. Standard 7: That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. Response: This property and the (15) existing buildings on the property have operated as a multi family community for at least 50 year. The (3) new accessory structures proposed by the conditional use would support and improve the existing function and appeal of the property within the district and are in line with the past and current function, operation, and appearance of the district. 3. Variation from Zoning Regulations Bulk Regulations (§14.1304.A) To allow the existing condition of 2,475 sf of lot area per dwelling unit (17.6 units per acre) to remain Standard 1: Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations was to be applied; Response: The lot size and apartment quantities are unchanged by the proposed scope of work, but do not comply with current Village Zoning Code requirements for Bulk Regulations. The existing lot size is 851,142 sf (19.54 acres). There are currently 344 apartments within the 14 existing apartment buildings to remain. A Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. 851,142sf / 344 Units = 2,475 sf of lot area is provided per unit 344 Units/ 19.54 Acres= 17.6 units per acre are provided Standard 2: The conditions upon which an application for a variation are based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other property within the same zoning classification; Response: The lot size and apartment quantity on the site have been in this arrangement for at least 50 years and are unique to this site. This is an existing condition that will remain unchanged by the proposed scope of work. A Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. Standard 3: The purpose of the variation is not based primarily upon a desire to increase financial gain; Response: The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. Standard 4: The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Response: The lot size and apartment quantity on the site have been in this arrangement within the neighborhood for at least 50 years and will remain unchanged by this proposal. The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Standard 5: The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; Response: The lot size and apartment quantity on the site have been in this arrangement within the neighborhood for at least 50 years and will remain unchanged by this proposal. The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. Standard 6: The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and Response: The lot size and apartment quantity on the site have been in this arrangement within the neighborhood for at least 50 years and will remain unchanged by this proposal. The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. Standard 7: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage or create drainage problems on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Response: The lot size and apartment quantity on the site have been in this arrangement within the neighborhood for at least 50 years and will remain unchanged by this proposal. The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. 4. Variation from Zoning Regulations Lot Coverage (§14.1304.C) To allow a lot coverage of 466,000sf (54.8% of 851,142sf) to be provided Standard 1: Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations was to be applied; Response: The existing lot coverage on the site prior to any proposed renovation work is 52.7% (448,415sf) of the total lot area (851,142sf). This existing condition exceeds the maximum lot coverage allowed (50%) and is non- conforming with the current Village Code. A variance would be required to bring the existing condition into compliance. Alternately, reducing the amount of parking to bring the site into compliance that exists on the site currently is undesirable. The scope of new hardscape being proposed includes first the removal of the under -used tennis courts, of the one way road and parking area of the existing leasing office, an existing inefficient parking area, and of portions of the entrance drive which is in need of repair. In its place, the proposed scope creates a new overall lot coverage of 54.8% (466,000sf) and in doing so provides an additional 30 total parking spaces in a new landscaped parking area, a new landscaped entry drive, (3) new accessory buildings to improve the function and desirability of the property, and a new central park area which includes a new pool, pathways, and seating areas. The added hardscape area is efficient and will add to the overall quality, character, and function of the community while still maintaining an appropriate quantity of green area and park spaces. Standard 2: The conditions upon which an application for a variation are based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other property within the same zoning classification; Response: The variance request will allow us this property to overcome an existing non -conforming condition specific to this site, and at the same time will allow improvements that add parking, increase appearance and operations, and add needed accessory functions such as o fitness center, an outdoor pool, and a modern leasing office which are in keeping with many of the higher quality residential properties on the market. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Standard 3: The purpose of the variation is not based primarily upon a desire to increase financial gain; Response: The owner wishes to provide improvements to the property that not only maintain its existing condition, but that improve the property to become a source of pride for its tenants and a leader in the marketplace for years to come. The added impervious surface will provide additional parking, amenity areas, and amenity structures. Standard 4: The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Response: The existing lot coverage on the site prior to any renovation work is 52.7% (448,415sf) of the total lot area (851,142sf) and exceeds that which is allowed but the Village Code. The improvements proposed by the owner are intended to increase the overall appeal and function of the existing multi -family community while maintaining or even improving the green spaces of the site. Standard 5: The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; Response: Granting of the variance will allow the owner to provide increased parking and new amenity areas for residents. Standard 6: The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and Response: The multi family site have been in this arrangement within the neighborhood for at least 50 years. The requested Variance will allow improvements to be made to the existing property that will increase both the longevity and quality of this property as well as add curb appeal which will benefit the area as a whole. Standard 7: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage or create drainage problems on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Response: Improvements proposed at the front and interior of the site and are not adjacent to neighboring properties. The additional parking being added will have minimal impact on traffic load. Drainage of the additional impervious area is handled on site in accordance with current regulations. Please refer to the enclosed Civil Plans for additional information. 5. Variation from Zoning Regulations Parking (§14.2224) To allow 596 parking spaces total (1.73 spaces/unit) to be provided under the condition that the owner continue to issue parking passes to tenants. Standard 1: Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations was to be applied; Response: The existing parcel currently contains (14) Multi -Family buildings with a total of 344 existing apartment units and 556 existing parking spaces (1.65 spaces per unit). The quantity of existing parking spaces (556 spaces) is 161 spaces short of the minimum number required by §14.2224 (717 spaces) for the 344 multi- family apartments and is in non-conformance with the Village Code. Please note that currently the owner requires parking passes to park on the site and makes these passes available to tenants at the following amounts: 1 pass per 1 Bedroom Unit, 2 passes per 2 & 3 Bedroom Units. Only 495 parking passes have been requested/issued so far this year and historically less than 500 parking passes are issued at any given time. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application The existing amount of on-site parking has historically satisfied the demand for tenant parking -currently there is a surplus of 61 spaces which are unclaimed and unused. As part of the Scope of Improvements, apartment renovations are proposed to convert (142) 2 -bedroom units to 3 -bedroom units. This change will more closely align the unit types on the property with current and future market demand for 3 bedroom units. Overall, this will add (142) new bedrooms to the property. The proposed site development adds 30 total new parking spaces (586 total parking spaces) within a reconfigured parking area towards the front entry to the site. The Owner will continue to require parking passes for tenants at the some rates of availability: 1 pass per 1 Bedroom Unit, 2 passes per 2 & 3 Bedroom Units. 568 total possible passes will still be available after the conversion work is complete. With 586 parking spaces and only 568 possible passes available, this leaves 18 more parking spaces than permits which will be used for visitor parking adjacent to the new Leasing Building. The capacity to add parking to the site is limited by the existing site area and configurations. However, the demand for parking can be satisfied by adding 30 new spaces to the site and maintaining the parking pass program that is currently in place. Standard 2: The conditions upon which an application for a variation are based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other property within the same zoning classification; Response: The existing lot size is 851,142sf and has an existing lot coverage of 52.790, as outlined in Variance request 4 above. The existing parking quantity available (556 spaces) on the property is less than the minimum required by the code. At the same time, the amount of impervious surface as well as the number of existing apartment buildings both exceed the maximum quantities established by the Village Code. The Scope of Work is proposing to add 30 new parking spaces. The total amount of new parking should satisfy the new demand for parking. This additional new parking along with other new impervious surface area associated with the proposed new amenities being added will total 54.8% of the site area. We feel that our proposal provides adequate parking while maintaining an appropriate ratio of green space on the site. Standard 3: The purpose of the variation is not based primarily upon a desire to increase financial gain; Response: The existing amount of parking provided on site is non-compliant as it is below the total quantity required by the current code. The proposed total amount of parking being requested (586 spaces) will create 30 new spaces overall. This new total amount of available spaces will be in excess of the total amount of parking passes available to tenants allowing for excess (designated) parking spaces that can be used by visitors and staff. We feel that the amount of parking being proposed is appropriate and adequate, while also maintaining an appropriate amount of green space and park area on the site. Standard 4: The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Response: The existing amount of parking provided on site is non-compliant as it is below the total quantity required by the current code. The proposed total amount of parking being requested (586 spaces) will create 30 new spaces overall. This new total amount of available spaces will be in excess of the total amount of parking passes available to tenants allowing for excess (designated) parking spaces that can be used by visitors and staff. We feel that the amount of parking being proposed is appropriate and adequate, while also maintaining an appropriate amount of green space and park area on the site. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Standard 5: The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; Response: Granting this variation will increase the amount of parking available to tenants while maintaining adequate open green space and new park amenity areas available to tenants. Standard 6: The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and Response: The new (reconfigured) parking area proposed is located within the interior of the site and will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Standard 7: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage or create drainage problems on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Response: New parking lighting, drainage, and other conditions are being designed to comply with the Village Code and all other applicable governing bodies. Additionally, the parking area is located at the interior of the site and new lighting will be located far from the perimeter lot lines and neighboring properties. 6. Variation from Zonine Reeulations Existing Parking Lot Conditions Yard Setbacks (§14.1304.B) Parking Lot Lighting (§14.2219) Parking Lot Landscaping (§14.2306) To allow existing non -conforming parking lot conditions to remain Standard 1: Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a specific hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations was to be applied; Response: The existing perimeter Parking Lot areas are unchanged by the proposed scope of work, but do not comply with current Village Zoning Code requirements for Yard Setbacks, Parking Lighting, or Parking Landscaping. The Owner is proposing signifigant improvements that are focused on other more prominent portions of the site that will provide increased appearance, function, curb appeal, and longevity to the multi -family property as a whole. We are requesting to be allowed to focus available capital resources on the proposed improvement areas of the property and will provide maintainance and routine improvements to existing parking areas to remain. A Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. Standard 2: The conditions upon which an application for a variation are based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not generally applicable to other property within the same zoning classification; Response: The parking lot arrangement, parking lighting, and parking landscaping on the site have been in this arrangement for at least 20 years (and likely much longer) and are unique to this site. These existing conditions will remain unchanged by the proposed scope of work. A Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. Standard 3: The purpose of the variation is not based primarily upon a desire to increase financial gain; vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Response: The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code and will allow the financial resources available to be focused on the proposed scope of work. Standard 4: The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property; Response: The parking lot arrangement, parking lighting, and parking landscaping on the site have been in this arrangement for at least 20 years (and likely much longer) and are unique to this site. These existing conditions were in place at the time the Owner purchased the property in late 2014. Standard 5: The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located; Response: The parking lot arrangement, parking lighting, and parking landscaping on the site have been in this arrangement for at least 20 years (and likely much longer) and are unique to this site. The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. Standard 6: The granting of the variation will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood; and Response: The parking lot arrangement, parking lighting, and parking landscaping on the site have been in this arrangement for at least 20 years (and likely much longer) and are unique to this site. The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. Standard 7: The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or impair natural drainage or create drainage problems on adjacent properties, or endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Response: The parking lot arrangement, parking lighting, and parking landscaping on the site have been in this arrangement for at least 20 years (and likely much longer) and are unique to this site. The requested Variance is needed to bring the existing conditions into compliance with the current Village Code. vocon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Appendix 2 Site & Project Information Parcel Pin: 08-15-400-069-1010 08-15-400-069-1011 VUCon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Proposed Master Planned Existing Conditions Development 851,142 sf 851,142 sf Lot Size: (19.54 acres)(unchanged) Lot Coverage ............................................................................................................................................................. Roadway 224,673 sf ^232,000 sf & Parking ...... ........................ Buildings 160,672 sf ............................................... —165,000 sf .......... ............... Walkways 63,070 sf —69,000 sf ............... Total = 448,415 sf = 466,000 sf (52.7% of Lot) (54.8% Lot Coverage) # Buildings 15 (14 Apt + 1 Amenity) ....... .................. _.... .................... ............. 18 (14 Apt + 2 Amenity+ 2 Stor) Total Bldg Area 382,032 gsf (all floors) ....................... 387,000 gsf (all floors) # Dwelling Units 344 Apartments 344 Apartments (unchanged) Unit Mix Type ........ ......... Existing Post -Renovation 1 Bedroom 120 120 2 Bedroom 218 218 3 Bedroom 6 344 6 344 Total Apartments Parking 556 Parking Spaces 586 Parking Spaces 1.62 Cars/Unit 1.7 Cars/Unit VUCon. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Appendix 3 Apartment Area & Information Matrix: Listed by Apartment Building Appendix contents begin on the next page VUCUn. partnerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application Building 1 2000-2004 W. Algonquin 1 16 Units 1 2 Stones unit# Address Intl Exidng Proposed Unit Are. unit# Address Ind E.idng Proposed Unit Are. rYpe (st) rYpe (st) 01A 2000 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 05A 2002 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 01B 2000 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 05B 2002 W. Algonquin Road - 5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 02A 2000 W. Algonquin Road - 2A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 06A 2004 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 02B 2000 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 06B 2004 W. Algonquin Road - 6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03A 2000 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07A 2004 W. Algonquin Road - 7A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 03B 2000 W. Algonquin Road - 3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07B 2004 W. Algonquin Road - 7B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 04A 2002 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 08A 2004 W. Algonquin Road - 8A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 04B 2002 W. Algonquin Road - 4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 1 108B 2004 W. Algonquin Road - 8B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 ing 2 W. Algonquin 1 45 Units 1 3 Stories unit# Address 01A 2006 W. Algonquin Road -1A 01B 2006 W. Algonquin Road -1 B 01C 2006 W. Algonquin Road -1C 02A 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 2A 02B 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 2B 02C 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 2C 03A 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 3A 03B 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 3B 03C 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 3C 04A 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 4A 04B 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 4B 04C 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 4C 05A 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 5A 05B 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 5B 05C 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 5C and and Are. rYpe E.isdng Proposed (st) D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 A 1 BR 1 BR 835 Building 3 2008-2014 W. Algonquin 1 20 Units 1 2 Stones # Address 01A 2008 W. Algonquin Road -1A 01B 2008 W. Algonquin Road -1 B 02A 2008 W. Algonquin Road - 2A 02B 2008 W. Algonquin Road - 2B 03A 2008 W. Algonquin Road - 3A 03B 2008 W. Algonquin Road - 3B 04A 2010 W. Algonquin Road - 4A 04B 2010 W. Algonquin Road -4B 05A 2010 W. Algonquin Road - 5A 05B 2010 W. Algonquin Road - 5B and and wren rYpe Exidng Proposed (st) B 2 BR 2 BR 895 B 2 BR 2 BR 895 B 2 BR 2 BR 895 B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 unV# Address and rvPe E.isdng Proposed and Are. I+Fl 06A 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 6A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 06B 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 6B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 06C 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 6C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 07A 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 7A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 07B 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 7B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 07C 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 7C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08A 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 8A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08B 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 8B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08C 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 8C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09A 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 9A A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 09B 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 9B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09C 2006 W. Algonquin Road - 9C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10A 2006 W. Algonquin Road -10A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10B 2006 W. Algonquin Road -10B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10C 2006 W. Algonquin Road -10C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 unV# Address and rvPe E.isdng Proposed undnrea I+Fl 06A 2012 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 06B 2012 W. Algonquin Road -6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07A 2012 W. Algonquin Road - 7A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07B 2012 W. Algonquin Road -7B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08A 2014 W. Algonquin Road - 8A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08B 2014 W. Algonquin Road -8B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 09A 2014 W. Algonquin Road - 9A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 09B 2014 W. Algonquin Road - 9B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 10A 2014 W. Algonquin Road -10A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 10B 2014 W. Algonquin Road -10B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 and unV# Address rvPe E.isdng Proposed and area I+Fl 11A 2006 W. Algonquin Road -11A A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 11B 2006 W. Algonquin Road -11 B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11C 2006 W. Algonquin Road -11 C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12A 2006 W. Algonquin Road -12A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12B 2006 W. Algonquin Road -12B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12C 2006 W. Algonquin Road -12C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 13A 2006 W. Algonquin Road -13A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 13B 2006 W. Algonquin Road -13B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 13C 2006 W. Algonquin Road -13C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 14A 2006 W. Algonquin Road -14A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 14B 2006 W. Algonquin Road -14B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 14C 2006 W. Algonquin Road -14C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 15A 2006 W. Algonquin Road -15A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 15B 2006 W. Algonquin Road -15B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 15C 2006 W. Algonquin Road -15C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 Building 4 2016-2022 W. Algonquin 1 20 Units 1 2 Stones unV# Address unn rvPe Exisdng Proposed unn wren I+Fl 01A 2022 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 01B 2022 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02A 2022 W. Algonquin Road - 2A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02B 2022 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 03A 2022 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03B 2022 W. Algonquin Road - 3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 04A 2020 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 04B 2020 W. Algonquin Road -4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 05A 2020 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 05B 2020 W. Algonquin Road - 5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 ing 5 (New Construction 2011 - No Apartment Renovations) W. Algonquin 1 39 Units 1 3 Stories unV# Address unn rvPe Exisdng Proposed unn wren I+Fl 06A 2018 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 06B 2018 W. Algonquin Road -6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07A 2018 W. Algonquin Road - 7A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07B 2018 W. Algonquin Road -7B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08A 2016 W. Algonquin Road - 8A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08B 2016 W. Algonquin Road -8B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 09A 2016 W. Algonquin Road - 9A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 09B 2016 W. Algonquin Road - 9B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 10A 2016 W. Algonquin Road -10A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 10B 2016 W. Algonquin Road -10B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 UnR UnR Area UnR UnR Area # Address Exisdng Proposed unV# Address Exisdng Proposed rvPe (It)rvPe I+Fl 01A 2024 W. Algonquin Road -1A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 01B 2024 W. Algonquin Road -1 B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 01C 2024 W. Algonquin Road -1C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 02A 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 2A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 02B 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 2B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 02C 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 2C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 03A 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 3A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 03B 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 3B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 03C 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 3C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 04A 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 4A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 04B 2024 W. Algonquin Road -4B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 04C 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 4C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 Building 6 2026-2030 W. Algonquin 1 16 Units 1 2 Stories unV# AddressExisdng unn rYPe 05B 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 5B Proposed unn wren (sFl 01A 2026 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 01B 2026 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02A 2026 W. Algonquin Road - 2A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02B 2026 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 03A 2026 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03B 2026 W. Algonquin Road - 3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 04A 2028 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 04B 2028 W. Algonquin Road -4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 05A 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 5A A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 05B 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 5B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 05C 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 5C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 06A 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 6A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 06B 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 6B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 06C 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 6C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 07A 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 7A A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 07B 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 7B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 07C 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 7C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08A 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 8A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08B 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 8B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08C 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 8C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 unV# Address unn rYPe Exisdng Proposed unnnrea I+Fl 05A 2028 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 05B 2028 W. Algonquin Road -5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 06A 2030 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 06B 2030 W. Algonquin Road -6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07A 2030 W. Algonquin Road - 7A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 07B 2030 W. Algonquin Road - 7B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 08A 2030 W. Algonquin Road - 8A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 08B 2030 W. Algonquin Road - 8B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 UnR unV# Address rvPe Exisdng Proposed UnR Area I+Fl 09A 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 9A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09B 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 9B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09C 2024 W. Algonquin Road - 9C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10A 2024 W. Algonquin Road -10A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10B 2024 W. Algonquin Road -10B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10C 2024 W. Algonquin Road -10C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11A 2024 W. Algonquin Road -11A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11B 2024 W. Algonquin Road -11 B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11C 2024 W. Algonquin Road -11 C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12A 2024 W. Algonquin Road -12A E 3 BR 3 BR 1,265 12B 2024 W. Algonquin Road -12B E 3 BR 3 BR 1,265 12C 2024 W. Algonquin Road -12C E 3 BR 3 BR 1,265 13A 2024 W. Algonquin Road -13A E 3 BR 3 BR 1,265 13B 2024 W. Algonquin Road -13B E 3 BR 3 BR 1,265 13C 2024 W. Algonquin Road -13C E 3 BR 3 BR 1,265 Building 7 2032-2036 W. Algonquin 1 16 Units 1 2 Stories # Address Unrt Exisdng Proposed Unit Are. unit# Address gnd Exisdng Proposed Unit Are. tYPe (st) tYPe (st) 01A 2032 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 05A 2034 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 01B 2032 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 05B 2034 W. Algonquin Road - 5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 02A 2032 W. Algonquin Road - 2A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 06A 2036 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 02B 2032 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 06B 2036 W. Algonquin Road - 6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03A 2032 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07A 2036 W. Algonquin Road - 7A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 03B 2032 W. Algonquin Road - 3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07B 2036 W. Algonquin Road - 7B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 04A 2034 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 08A 2036 W. Algonquin Road - 8A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 04B 2034 W. Algonquin Road -4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 1 108B 2036 W. Algonquin Road -8B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 Building 8 1994-1998 W. Algonquin 1 15 Units 1 2 Stones unit unit wren # Address Type Exisdng Proposed (st) 01A 1998 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 01B 1998 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02B 1998 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 03A 1998 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03B 1998 W. Algonquin Road - 3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 04A 1996 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 04B 1996 W. Algonquin Road -4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 Building 9 1988-1992 W. Algonquin 1 16 Units 1 2 Stones Exisdng Proposed unV# AddressExisdng unit tvPe Proposed unit wren I+Fl 01A 1992 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 01B 1992 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02A 1992 W. Algonquin Road - 2A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02B 1992 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 03A 1992 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03B 1992 W. Algonquin Road - 3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 04A 1990 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 04B 1990 W. Algonquin Road -4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 unV# Address unit tvPe Exisdng Proposed unit Area I+Fl 05A 1996 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 05B 1996 W. Algonquin Road -5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 06A 1994 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 06B 1994 W. Algonquin Road -6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07A 1994 W. Algonquin Road - 7A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 07B 1994 W. Algonquin Road - 7B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 08A 1994 W. Algonquin Road - 8A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 08B 1994 W. Algonquin Road - 8B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 unV# AddressExisdng unit tvPe Proposed unit Aren I+Fl 05A 1990 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 05B 1990 W. Algonquin Road -5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 06A 1988 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 06B 1988 W. Algonquin Road -6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07A 1988 W. Algonquin Road - 7A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 07B 1988 W. Algonquin Road - 7B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 08A 1988 W. Algonquin Road - 8A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 08B 1988 W. Algonquin Road - 8B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 Building 10 1986W. Algonquin 1 39 Units 1 3 Stones 2 BR 2 BR 895 01B 1984 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02B 1984 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR Wft 930 03A 1984 W. Algonquin Road - 3A Wft A- 2 BR Wft 1,040 03B 1984 W. Algonquin Road - 3B Wft Am Wft 2 BR Wft Am unV# Address Add TYPe Exifing Proposed (St)�YPe unV# Address C Exifing Proposed (St) unV# Address Existing Proposed (iFl 01A 1986 W. Algonquin Road -1A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,24006A 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 6A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10A 1986 W. Algonquin Road -10A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 01B 1986 W. Algonquin Road -1 B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 06B 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 6B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10B 1986 W. Algonquin Road -10B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 01C 1986 W. Algonquin Road -1 C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 06C 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 6C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10C 1986 W. Algonquin Road -10C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 02A 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 2A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 07A 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 7A A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 11A 1986 W. Algonquin Road -11A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 02B 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 2B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 07B 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 7B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11B 1986 W. Algonquin Road -11 B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 02C 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 2C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 07C 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 7C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11C 1986 W. Algonquin Road -11 C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 03A 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 3A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08A 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 8A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12A 1986 W. Algonquin Road -12A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 03B 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 3B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08B 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 8B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12B 1986 W. Algonquin Road -12B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 03C 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 3C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08C 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 8C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12C 1986 W. Algonquin Road -12C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 04A 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 4A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09A 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 9A A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 13A 1986 W. Algonquin Road -13A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 04B 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 4B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09B 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 9B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 13B 1986 W. Algonquin Road -13B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 04C 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 4C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09C 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 9C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 13C 1986 W. Algonquin Road -13C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 05A 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 5A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 05B 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 5B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 05C 1986 W. Algonquin Road - 5C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 Building 11 1978-1984 W. Algonquin 1 19 Units 1 2 Stones # Address Wft Exifing Proposed Wft A- unit# Address WftExifing Proposed Wft Areel ,YPe (St) Ype (St) 01A 1984 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 01B 1984 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 02B 1984 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 03A 1984 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03B 1984 W. Algonquin Road - 3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 04A 1982 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 04B 1982 W. Algonquin Road -4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 05A 1982 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 05B 1982 W. Algonquin Road - 5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 06A 1980 W. Algonquin Road - 6A Building 12 1970-1976 W. Algonquin I 19 Units I 2 Stones IInR IInR Areo IInR IInR Areo unR# Address Exifing Proposed unR# Address Exifing Proposed �YPe (sFl TYPe (sFl 01A 1976 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 06A 1972 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 01B C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 06B 1980 W. Algonquin Road -6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07A 1980 W. Algonquin Road - 7A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 07B 1980 W. Algonquin Road -7B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08A 1978 W. Algonquin Road - 8A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08B 1978 W. Algonquin Road -8B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 09A 1978 W. Algonquin Road - 9A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 09B 1978 W. Algonquin Road - 9B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 10A 1978 W. Algonquin Road -10A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 10B 1978 W. Algonquin Road -10B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 1976 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 06B 1972 W. Algonquin Road - 6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 02A 1976 W. Algonquin Road - 2A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 07A 1972 W. Algonquin Road - 7A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 02B 1976 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 07B 1972 W. Algonquin Road - 7B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03A 1976 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08A 1970 W. Algonquin Road - 8A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03B 1976 W. Algonquin Road -3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08B 1970 W. Algonquin Road -8B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 04A 1974 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 09B 1970 W. Algonquin Road - 9B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 04B 1974 W. Algonquin Road -4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 10A 1970 W. Algonquin Road -10A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 05A 1974 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 10B 1970 W. Algonquin Road -10B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 05B 1974 W. Algonquin Road - 5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 Building 13 1968W. Algonquin 1 45 Units 1 3 Stones Wft Wft Areo Wft Wft Areo unV# AddressExifing Wft Proposed (sFl Wft Areo Wft Exifing Proposed Wft Areo Add unV# Address TYPe Exifing Proposed (St)�YPe unV# Address 2 BR Exifing Proposed (St) unV# Address Existing Proposed (iFl 01A 1968 W. Algonquin Road -1A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 06A 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 6A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11A 1968 W. Algonquin Road -11A A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 01B 1968 W. Algonquin Road -1 B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 06B 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 6B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11B 1968 W. Algonquin Road -11 B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 01C 1968 W. Algonquin Road -1 C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 06C 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 6C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 11C 1968 W. Algonquin Road -11 C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 02A 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 2A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 07A 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 7A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12A 1968 W. Algonquin Road -12A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 02B 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 2B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 07B 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 7B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12B 1968 W. Algonquin Road -12B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 02C 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 2C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 07C 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 7C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 12C 1968 W. Algonquin Road -12C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 03A 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 3A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08A 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 8A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 13A 1968 W. Algonquin Road -13A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 03B 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 3B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08B 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 8B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 13B 1968 W. Algonquin Road -13B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 03C 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 3C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 08C 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 8C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 13C 1968 W. Algonquin Road -13C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 04A 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 4A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09A 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 9A A- 1 BR 1 BR 735 14A 1968 W. Algonquin Road -14A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 04B 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 4B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09B 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 9B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 14B 1968 W. Algonquin Road -14B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 04C 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 4C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 09C 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 9C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 14C 1968 W. Algonquin Road -14C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 05A 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 5A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10A 1968 W. Algonquin Road -10A A 1 BR 1 BR 835 15A 1968 W. Algonquin Road -15A D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 05B 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 5B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 10B 1968 W. Algonquin Road -10B A 1 BR 1 BR 835 15B 1968 W. Algonquin Road -15B D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 05C 1968 W. Algonquin Road - 5C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 1 110C 1968 W. Algonquin Road -10C A 1 BR 1 BR 835 1 115C 1968 W. Algonquin Road -15C D 2 BR 2 BR 1,240 Building 14 1960-1966 W. Algonquin 1 19 Units 1 2 Stones Wft Wft Areo UnR UnR Areo unV# AddressExifing �YPe Proposed (sFl unV# Address TYPe Exifing Proposed (sFl 01A 1966 W. Algonquin Road -1A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 06A 1962 W. Algonquin Road - 6A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 01B 1966 W. Algonquin Road -1 B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 06B 1962 W. Algonquin Road - 6B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 02A 1966 W. Algonquin Road - 2A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 07A 1962 W. Algonquin Road - 7A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 02B 1966 W. Algonquin Road - 2B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 07B 1962 W. Algonquin Road - 7B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03A 1966 W. Algonquin Road - 3A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08A 1960 W. Algonquin Road - 8A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 03B 1966 W. Algonquin Road - 3B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 08B 1960 W. Algonquin Road - 8B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 04A 1964 W. Algonquin Road - 4A C- 2 BR 2 BR 960 09B 1960 W. Algonquin Road - 9B B 2 BR 2 BR 895 04B 1964 W. Algonquin Road - 4B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 10A 1960 W. Algonquin Road -10A B 2 BR 2 BR 895 05A 1964 W. Algonquin Road - 5A C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 10B 1960 W. Algonquin Road -10B B+ 2 BR 2 BR 930 05B 1964 W. Algonquin Road - 5B C 2 BR 2 BR 1,040 Appendix 4 Parking Study Introduction: The following is a record of observations taken on the dates and times noted of existing parking lot utilizations at the Mount Prospect Greens Apartments. Observations: Wednesday, July 29th, 2015 161 of 556 Total Parking Spaces were occupied 1:00 pm 161 Non -Handicapped 0 Handicapped (0% of 11 Handicapped spaces utilized) 395 spaces were not utilized 29.0% of Parking was occupied 1 71.0% of Parking was unoccupied Thursday, July 30th, 2015 400 of 556 Total Parking Spaces were occupied 1:00 am 395 Non -Handicapped 5 Handicapped (45.4% of 11 Handicapped spaces utilized) 156 spaces were not utilized 71.9% of Parking was occupied 1 28.1% of Parking was unoccupied Saturday, August 1St, 2015 312 of 556 Total Parking Spaces were occupied 1:00 pm 306 Non -Handicapped 6 Handicapped (54.5% of 11 Handicapped spaces utilized) 250 spaces were not utilized 55.0% of Parking was occupied 1 45.0% of Parking was unoccupied Sunday, August 2"d, 2015 351 of 556 Total Parking Spaces were occupied 1:00 am 348 Non -Handicapped 3 Handicapped (27.3% of 11 Handicapped spaces utilized) 208 spaces were not utilized 63.1% of Parking was occupied 136.9% of Parking was unoccupied Day I Time Total Parking Spaces Used Spaces Available Spaces Used Per Apartment (344 Apartments) 0.47 ............ 1.16 0.91 1.02 Quantity # Percentage %Quantity ................................... 161 29.0% # Percentage % ,....................... ° .... 395 71.0% 156 28.1% _ 250 45.0% 07/29/15 1:00 pm 556 Spaces 07/30/15 1:00 am 556 Spaces ............................. 400 71.9% 08/01/15 1 1:00 pm 556 Spaces ..................... 312 55.0% 08/02/15 1 1:00am 556 Spaces 351 63.1% 208 36.9% AVERAGE 556 Spaces 306 54.75% 253 45.25% 0.89 Summary: In summary, in our study, the maximum peak parking demand occurred on Thursday, July 3011 at 1:00 am (a weekday). At this time, the available parking was adequate to meet this demand with a surplus of 156 available parking space (28.1% of total parking available). Attached for reference are the 4 parking map surveys which document the observed parking. vocon. par+rlerS LLC. Mount Prospect Greens Apartments I Zoning Application )- ocl 'f i syQ I Ivl I I I I DATE AND TIME OF OBSERVATION TOTAL PARKING SPACES ON SITE 556 SPACES SIS REGULAR Il HANDICAP TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCUPIED PARKING SPACES 161 R / 0 H.C. = 161 TOTAL PARKING SPACES VACANT 395 (71.0%) MOUNT PROSPECT GREENS APARTMENTS Site Parking Study vocono 1958 W ALGONQUIN RD, 07/27/15LAoa�a.00 MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056 TAL o❑ I ISI I I I I DATE AND TIME OF OBSERVATION 2, v TOTAL PARKING SPACES ON SITE 556 SPACES 535 REGULAR 11 HANDICAP TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCUPIED PARKING SPACES 395 R / 5 H. C. = 400 TOTAL TOTAL PARKING SPACES VACANT 156 (28.1%) MOUNT PROSPECT GREENS APARTMENTS Site Parking Study VoCOnu 1958 W ALGONQUIN RD, 07127115 I it0a7a.00 MT. PROSPECT. IL 60056 M%� I CT—) — _— I I ISI I I DATE AND TIME OF OBSERVATION g� TOTAL PARKING SPACES ON SITE 556 SPACES S*REGUL R 11 HANDICAP TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCUPIED PARKING SPACES 306 R/ 6 H.C. = 312 TOTAL PARKING SPACES VACANT 250 (45.0%) MOUNT PROSPECT GREENS APARTMENTS Site Parking Study VQCOno 1958 W ALGONQUIN RD, ovens I 14087d.00 MT. PROSPECT. IL 60056 AL /600 MOUNT PROSPECT GREENS APARTMENTS 1958 W ALGONQUIN RD, MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056 s�z Ivl I I I I DATE AND TIME OF OBSERVATION J TOTAL PARKING SPACES ON SITE 556 IACL 5 5REGDL R 11 HANDICAP TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCUPIED PARKING SPACES 348 R / 3 H. C. 35 TOTAL PARKING SPACES VACANT 208 (36.9%) Site Parking Study VOCOII. 07727/15 1 140874.00 TAL ZO _ iv&m uN m&� lu ~ ~~ a �o w_ wwww w>� N pz m opo. V O aW� z www= N as Z0 z 3o zos oz �GOw a ¢ ilk � o= 1 I; N- Cn �l— �l JMY� 5 V Z w W LU 7*1 API -F ry 4", O J� c� Uz LU z �� _ o Q � LL o z ry IZA- v ry o z O \ �\ LL w � w f akoo >E� Ln a��m� ¢° ygUoos 6E A OMS Z tnl waw y EL Fo8¢o oMLn ; o �6 ��i MU E=foo [ w a o o - 3LL E EBLn - - xr xo xxN xo xN rx_ _No _'. N O O L g o Pm U a � F a� e P3� " D a Q ¢` VA 8R -----------o vei a oe= m m w of P O -iii -- - - _ - Sa - - - --nom _ - _ ya- W-.-4, J. tt o - f akoo >E� Ln a��m� ¢° ygUoos 6E A OMS Z waw y EL Fo8¢o oMLn ; �6 ��i MU E=foo f v a�ao yy OMS Z EL �6 ��i NOOOA § a c � •" � � � a 7 r a � SIONIIII `103dSOHd 1NOOW odea+..nsa;CmuMoew� 000ro�ze. (see) segos sio��o� 'eian��aid a�uo wai,Mu�oo zzze -out 6u1�(anmg wpuel Hlf SN33il`J 103dSOkid 1Nf10W no '\S m uro �R€moos LEW Ra�BA ®mtlCN R¢•�09 �$s a: Y Q % gPd oa9 _ ffih _ 1 E INV —+• ,,,. � ,, 04�° ;�°4 � �`*: =111. 3 � �� v� 8� Stt rob 4`?• ��.+ + +4 ^e p,,�� n�`Ss'— — 11 - ��tri — — — — --`----�______—_ J 10) f �s gg os �x ma� a es Ml- Eme_ z"a_ 1g4h�m a a = - J e NV'ld NOIlIlOW3O (INV SNOIlIG NOD 9NIISIX9 377 '5ui-jaaui5 SION rjlI ' DgdSMId lNnOW - GVMI NInbNO9lV 1S9M 8S6T S_L NIWI'dVdV SN3]21E) IDIdSOdd INnow g o3Q5-0-k-- W svinINIVIO(IN03o(IN00 "It 00 00'42'37"E 799. d3A00 - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------- ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ... ........ wz-- 4- V- ----------- ou - - -------- ---------- i,--- N 0; 51 - ------ ---- ---------- -1 --- ---- --- ------- ---------- F----------- -------- rij . .... --- --- --- - m f- --------- It X.R - ---------- ------------- ------------ ------------ - ----- - IA----------- ---------------- ------ - -- -- b 2, ---------- - L------- ----------- ---- ---------------- --------------- -------------- ---------------- -------------------------------- 3NS3HAl3d T4 N00'43'23"W 821.37' 31NS3dJl3d V1 '5ui-jaaui5 N d ONRI99NION9 ),dVNIWI19'dd 377 SIONrm 'IDg dSMId INnOw - GVMI NInbNODIV -LS9M SS6T \' . SIN] I'dVdV SN33dE) ID3dSOdd INnow \j�� 6 . . . . . . . . . M -n N —5- W. �H ........... ©\ \\ ^ \ \ ° ��!\ C5 1,6 \ r :\\,: } \\ }{ \\} \s L 2 1 \ � � } IC : /�� � ,:� Sa`gm allom. Cc) - 9vNPz� �m'i' a �w =oE w z(D zos o m# �" �° D o w W o �'� °w J s ,o a°m °Qo o ww s° gwa °°° �w m n w m w w w m a , ---------------- t z LU a a U) - HH- Hnto bio -��v ma gemE� o€ - - 5 m�° - w�o -" _��-" - _ - a� - _- - -v �3 e - z of OEO, AS H. aV _ = z v lo o�a aaE a - -zZ, - - - ^2°'� Z. cmLL e.. e,.�ee� :o_ :e�<<Ea a=A�EMPH 'TT,oi l� I I I a < �.N�,°• 111 111 ` � l �M- a/ 7 aE•xoR� y 11 1 � mJ � �� �I� � ���j ,�� e q i� r�I• a sgusse 11 m a —1 W� t LU w -sR O `'•' �•.° _ A � � z � E`er.' �`°� � . z Lu LU Sa&m allom. Evv`gm W - �" �NQ'z� �m axe `•;60,� a o Lu �o zos ¢ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _q dp0 9 999 'O❑❑❑\/ 2p my fi Op o, x IJ w ms =m� ®�-- Zo oN ;l NF go o o " NUJ N ZS oZ #rya ' � � Z 0 0 �P #" N� oz >- ' aF skip m""�.,✓ ��j ooo og o o zqgo a u zzo 0 ag a� - a �o a N -w>� �m"gin Dasa U) U) w 0w a aW N V2 2�w 0 a a w w w w � � Z Z w Q U)> O W O Z LU w Z O m Of w�00 F w (ifz F J 0 w LL 7 Zzof g_ x Q C5 a 00LU LUZLU W ON Z b' LL w~w0Z • SCO U o --------- W v In J In o O w.5zg z ( , a w -�Y----------- p ------ --- a a LL U � U -01 \J I F0 $ W wU° '1 sUm J L Sa'%m fSi �z. 0 g � - Dasa aU) o w_ r z m LL V_ o� =: �W m E w w� N O cO➢F as Zc(7 ? as °m Z z 3�o z �ELfm �` a Qo9 - w LO 'M 'M H H H 0 <N oo lo a 0® u og II ISI All Tq' w VI - ---------- o - ;+ ° m II \\III (n lr � Y II \\ ¢�� LL ___ — If �I y ®0® _�; IIIPI � �a0� r I`- ( OX _ w CTJIlt�l ❑ o d �& �L 11\1"R5 I V V,I — \III z w z i To oz z-- 3 a w 3z rc 0 3 z O_Im O'e 9'O O_Im 5o y'O m�LA of of wi ¢i m w z rc� oQ z o. z z z0 O O F {{ > w j w a F m v � F c F = 0 0 zo Amy O a EcO➢F `¢s a z Z z o z z p LL � a 561 9 0 w z~ )zo - }- \\ §) \s } _ N \ � © - / /( \\ \ / \ ,® 2� - � r ` � � 2 ■ «� \| ) |? ` .a\Ak . \«?.,��w } e . \ , '^\/ / . % � , m . � kr ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE GRANTING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL USE FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1958-2036 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD MOUNT PROSPECT ILLINOIS WHEREAS, BWIP MPG OWNER, LLC (Petitioner), is seeking a Zoning Map Amendment from RX Single - Family Residence to R-4 Multi -Family Residence, a Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Variations to 1) density; 2) lot coverage; 3) parking; 4) landscaping and 5) lighting requirements for property located at 1958 — 2036 West Algonquin Road and legally described as: UNIT NUMBERS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ,12 , 13, AND 14 IN THE PROSPECT COMMONS CONDOMINIUM, AS DELINEATED ON A SURVEY OF PART OF LOT 2 IN EDWARD BUSSE'S DIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTHEAST % OF SECTION 15 AND THE NORTHEAST % OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHICH SURVEY IS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A" TO THE DECLARATION OF CONDOMINIUM FILED AS DOCUMENT LR 3048014, AND AS AMENDED BY THE AMENDMENT TO BY-LAWS RECORDED AUGUST 10, 2001 AS DOCUMENT NO. 0010737030; TOGETHER WITH THEIR UNDIVIDED PERCENTAGE INTEREST IN THE COMMON ELEMENTS, IN COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS. Property Index Number 08-15-400-069-1001/1002/1003/1004/100511006/1007/1008 08-15-400-069-1009/1010/1011/1012/1013/1014; and WHEREAS, the "Petitioner" seeks 1) Zoning Map Amendment from RX Single -Family Residence to R-4 Multi -Family Residence; 2) Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of sixteen (16) primary structures and two (2) accessory structures 3) Variation to allow 2,474.25 square feet of lot area per dwelling units (17.6 units per acre) 4) Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of 54.8%; 5) Variation to allow 586 parking spaces and Variation to allow existing parking lot landscaping, setbacks and lighting to remain as is as shown on the Petitioner's Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" and Plat of Survey attached as Exhibit "B" and; WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Variations being the subject of PZ -17-15 before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of August, 2015, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Daily Herald on the 8`h day of July 2015; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the Mayor and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ -17-15; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the request meets the standards of the Village and that the granting 1) Zoning Map Amendment from RX Single- Family Residence to R-4 Multi -Family Residence; 2) Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of sixteen (16) primary structures and two (2) accessory structures 3) Variation to allow 2,474.25 square feet of lot area per dwelling units (17.6 units per acre) 4) Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of 54.8%; 5) Variation to allow 586 parking spaces and 6) Variation to allow existing parking lot landscaping, setbacks and lighting to remain as is, would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. Page 2 of 2 PZ 17-15 1958-2036 Algonguin Road SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant 1) Zoning Map Amendment from RX Single -Family Residence to R-4 Multi -Family Residence; 2) Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of sixteen (16) primary structures and two (2) accessory structures 3) Variation to allow 2,474.25 square feet of lot area per dwelling units (17.6 units per acre) 4) Variation to allow an overall lot coverage of 54.8% 5) Variation to allow 586 parking spaces. and 6) Variation to allow existing parking lot landscaping, setbacks and lighting to remain as is, as shown on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" and Plat of Survey attached as Exhibit "B" subject to the following conditions: 1. Submittal of a Plat of Subdivision creating a single lot of record in compliance with Chapter 15 of the Village Code for review and approval.. 2. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by Vocon, dated July 30, 2015. 3. Obtaining permits from the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) for any work within Algonquin Road. 4. Submittal of final civil engineering drawings, including site work, utilities, storm water detention for review and approval by the Village. 5. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements including, but not limited to, stormwater detention, fire prevention, lighting, sign and building regulations; 6. A building permit in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. SECTION THREE The Village Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record a certified copy of this Ordinance and Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" Plat of Survey with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS:: ABSENT; PASSED and APPROVED this day of, 2015. Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk HACLK0 WIN\ORDINANCE2\PZ-17-151958-2036algonquin s Jul pill s i w � airloa P� $^� o a J a a NVId 9NR133NL` N3 AUVNIW IMId SIONITII'1J3dSOUd-NNOW - OVOU NInbN091V 1S3M 656T S1N3Wliltldtl SN33dE)133dSOdd - Nnow ifj ffs€�a48s�s=. n bye�a�� .i77�'64djj9-ZT&" 1j,, N . ,r I�P4�u���9l�IN���' .74 .. u , O'A �� ry m b r 04 s a ryyy t 4 � py * I A .. � w YM1 � .'gym.. � 0 E . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ATHION 11 H wom I 1 1) 1 t I 1 0 N5 AW 4— fill . . . . . . . . . . 11HIS, "Idild.1111 I (D SHI 42 "d !poll IN L, A ANQ VON'S own 4d Ull 0 Of pill 1 1 11 1 q 9 1 1 9 1 1 4 0 1 11V 1 1 j 10. loll 1 1 .1 1 v m ulm Hk 151 ON I ful I I I I I 11 Hal 11,11 H UP Is 11 11 11HUR all T:alp jam OHM mullO 1111 KAI 1 u Ht go OHM mullO 1111 KAI Z !o Z Na45 ^y"II�, Irri rca nnois e �""•wr. "3fAtCilll8 n554t4nti']3tl3IU:hp Po�tMi 3NLtrtrA1MN �`"w,,, LSVSwtNaN�aAAV tHNtlt9MeM1MSIN4t3x �Jltlfatlfl@mP'3t%H rr�n q w, V A�Yr m vwtr.t�.pa. 17 D i t plc I µ_.µ .� `k'ti''""��4 W! ��q � as �'''' •� d _ J .__ �mm I • .aaas h fI .wsa f — �` al I z `^w ... . _ f arnn �• ,�� Awa a � g d I U sum „ _a. ...„As ore•.aafin ....._ WO d 9R — ....J•i�. � as .tum wxe numz 9 �. _ su �_ m 8 4 x al �w w .. A. o. r ffi a xn rwl w N erxnd a�arxlu xve ac«a ag 9 T1 Tr in I : 31VOS zq- inn m — w®v wwv n ��s as dwn ,aw wreiwq,'.� - dwvva d .w "� wpm • w.v •nems ® ++r.a �mn me G O r�a.M W vyy j vma�ivM#/ c^Id�A➢AI�C v!+'wa'+W.r M�"+NwN r w w+va wa 4 as Emma d' =,/d w Mp♦�,a"4Id 1Cnse �. as an® L.,�,.r�.�.F�.�rc.AY,*�«, ,q.. f akoo >E� Ln a��m� ¢° ygUoos 6E A OMS Z tnl waw y EL Fo8¢o oMLn ; o �6 ��i MU E=foo [ w a o o - 3LL E EBLn - - xr xo xxN xo xN rx_ _No _'. N O O L g o Pm U a � F a� e P3� " D a Q ¢` VA 8R -----------o vei a oe= m m w of P O -iii -- - - _ - Sa - - - --nom _ - _ ya- W-.-4, J. tt o - f akoo >E� Ln a��m� ¢° ygUoos 6E A OMS Z waw y EL Fo8¢o oMLn ; �6 ��i MU E=foo f v a�ao yy OMS Z EL �6 ��i Sa&m allom. Evv`gm W - �" �NQ'z� �m axe `•;60,� a o Lu �o zos ¢ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _q dp0 9 999 'O❑❑❑\/ 2p my fi Op o, x IJ w ms =m� ®�-- Zo oN ;l NF go o o " NUJ N ZS oZ #rya ' � � Z 0 0 �P #" N� oz >- ' aF skip m""�.,✓ ��j ooo og o o zqgo a u zzo 0 ag a� - '5ui-jaaui5 N d ONRI99NION9 ),dVNIWI19'dd 377 SIONrm 'IDg dSMId INnOw - GVMI NInbNODIV -LS9M SS6T \' . SIN] I'dVdV SN33dE) ID3dSOdd INnow \j�� 6 . . . . . . . . . M -n N —5- W. �H ........... ©\ \\ ^ \ \ ° ��!\ C5 1,6 \ r :\\,: } \\ }{ \\} \s L 2 1 \ � � } IC : /�� � ,:� �'�''/ '�'/"'�'��iiiiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiii��i// /����: , .. I . • . I . 1 . THORPE & JENKIII MEMORANDUM To: David Strahl, Acting Village Manager From: Allen Wall Date: September 3, 2015 Re: Chapter 8 and Chapter 6 Amendments 15010 S. Ravinia Avenue, Ste 10 Orland Park, Illinois 60462-5353 T 708 349 3888 F 708 349 1506 www.ktjlaw.com The attached ordinance proposes a number of amendments to Chapter 8 of the Village Code that update and make it consistent with statutes and current Mount Prospect business practices. The ordinance deletes several sections of Chapter 8 rendered obsolete by changes in state and/or federal law. In some instances, these deleted provisions date back to the 1950's and 1970's. Other sections are inconsistent with the ways the Village conducts business and, for this reason, needed revision. For instance, the Finance Department no longer requires that the new occupant of a property must satisfy the Village that all past due and current water, sewer and garbage charges have been paid in full. This change in Finance Department procedure is reflected in an amendment that deletes Section 8.805, subsection B. The most substantial amendment adds a new section to Article XVIII — "Municipal Motor Fuel Tax." The proposed addition, Section 8.1806, provides that motor fuel retailers who fail to pay the Village's municipal motor vehicle tax can have their business licenses revoked unless they pay the arrearages within thirty days after receiving notice. Below you will find explanations for each of the recommended Chapter 8 amendments followed by the explanations for the recommended Chapter 6 amendments. I have indicated additions and deletions where it seemed useful to do so. 1 SECTION 1: Section 8.103, "Term of Office: Vacancies," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," currently states: Every appointive officer of the village shall hold office until May 1 following his appointment or until his successor is appointed and qualified, unless it is otherwise provided by ordinance. In case of a vacancy in any such place, it shall be filled in the same manner in which appointments or selections are made, in the absence of provision to the contrary. It is recommended that Section 8.103 be deleted in its entirety. Village appointed officers do not hold office on the schedule described in this Code provision. SECTION : Section 8.104, "Monies Received," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," currently states: Every officer of the village shall at least once a month turn over all money received by him in his official capacity, to the treasurer with a statement showing the source from which the same was received. It is recommended that Section 8.104 be deleted in its entirety. Village officers do not receive money in their official capacities. Further, the Village no longer has a treasurer. SECTION 3: It is recommended that Section 8.105, "Oath," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," be amended to read as follows: Every elected officer and_all police officers in the Meauaat l�ros�ct P'olic Department and all Mount Prospect Fire Department firefighters shall, before entering upon their duties, take the oath prescribed by statute. The added references to all police officers in the Mount Prospect Police Department and all Mount Prospect Fire Department firefighters makes Section 8.105 consistent with the Village's actual practice regarding the individual required to take an oath of offices. SECTION 4: Section 8.108, "Records," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," currently states: 2 All records kept by an officer of the village shall be open to inspection by the president, or any member of the board of trustees at all reasonable times, whether or not such records are required to be kept by statute or ordinance. It is recommended that Section 8.108 be deleted in its entirety because the Village follows state law, including the Freedom of Information Act, with regard to the disclosure and availability of public records. SECTION 5: It is recommended that Section 8.111, Subsection A, "Termination of Office," of Article I, "Officer; Employees," be amended to read as follows: Every elected officer at the conclusion of his or her term in office shall deliver to his or her successor all books, documents and records which may be the property of the Village; and if no successor has been appointed within one week after the termination of office, such property shall be delivered to the Village Clerk or—Qlage tivasufef. l vcry eni loyee ;n)(Mi the end of'his or her eni to incrit for any cause whatsoever shall deliver to his or her Department head all book, documents and records which may e the I�ro rt of the Village. The recommended amendments to Section 8.111 clarify the process that both elected officers and Village employees should use to return Village materials at the end of their time in office or at the conclusion of their Mount Prospect employment. The amendments reflect the current practice the Village follows in these situations. SECTION 6: It is recommended that Section 8.115, "Conflicts of Interest," Subsection F (1), "Disclosure Statements," be amended to read as follows: All public officials shall file with the village clerk each year a disclosure statement, �� �d� -le i 9, fern: It is recommended that the remainder of Subsection F (1) and the "Disclosure Statement" that follows be deleted. If the Board members do not have to file the "Disclosure Statement" set forth in Subsection F (1), then they would be able to file the current Village disclosure statement 3 with the Village Clerk electronically. Board members currently file their Cook County disclosure statement electronically and it might be a convenience to them if they can file their Village disclosure statement in the same fashion. The disclosure statements that public officials file change periodically. If the Village does not set forth in the Code the disclosure statement Board members must file, then the Code will not need revision every time the disclosure statement changes. SECTION 7: It is recommended that Section 8.509, "Submitting Questions of Public Policy," of Article V, "Other Regulations," be deleted in its entirety. This section of Chapter 8, which was adopted in 1978, pertains to the procedures for getting a non-binding advisory referendum on the ballot for Village voter consideration. The Illinois Election Code, at 10 ILCS 5/28-1 et seq. also spells out comprehensively the steps that a citizen must take to place an advisory, non-binding referendum before the voters. In order to avoid any confusion between the requirements of the Village Code and the Election Code, it is recommended that the Village follow the Election Code provisions as these statutes relate to advisory referendum. SECTION 8: It is recommended that Article VI, "Employee Organizations," be deleted in its entirety and Article VI be reserved for future consideration. Article VI addresses labor issues with Village employees. The Article VI provisions have been preempted by state law. SECTION 9: it is recommended that Section 8.701, "Succession in the Event of emergency," Subsection A(1), of Article VII, "Succession of Officers," be amended to read as: The coordinator of the Mount Prospect emergency management agency or the Fire Chief, then 4 This amendment adds the Village Fire Chief to the first order of preference to fill the office of Village Manager during an emergency or natural disaster if the village manager dies or is rendered incapable of performing his or her duties. Adding the Village Fire Chief to Subsection A(1), makes the Village Code consistent with Mount Prospect's emergency management plan. SECTION 10: Section 8.805, "Declaration Forms," Subsection B, of Article VIII, Real Estate Transfer Tax," currently states: Certificate of payment of Water and Sewer and Garbage Collection Charges: In order to obtain stamps or an exemption seal, the applicant must satisfy the village that all past due water, sewer and garbage collection charges have been paid in full. If occupancy of a property is changing, then in order to obtain stamps or an exemption seal, the applicant must satisfy the village that all past due and current, sewer and garbage collection charges have been paid in full. It is recommended that Subsection B be deleted in its entirety to conform the Code to current Village business practice. The Finance Department now will pursue past due water, sewer and/or garbage services charges through collections, rather than place an inconvenience on the buyer or new occupant for past due payments incurred by the seller or prior occupant. SECTION 11: It is recommended that Section 8.1502, "Tax Imposed," of Article XV, "Simplified Municipal Telecommunications Tax," be amended by deleting Subsections B and C in their entirety. These subsections authorizing the Village to impose certain telecommunications taxes have been overridden by federal statutes and regulations. SECTION 12: It is recommended that a new Section 8.1806, "Enforcement; License Suspension, Revocation,' be added to Article XVIII, "Municipal Motor Fuel Tax." This proposed new provision allows that motor fuel retailers who fail to pay the Village's municipal motor fuel tax can have their business licenses revoked unless they pay the arrearages within thirty days after receiving a delinquency notice. Currently, the Village's sole recourse 5 against tax delinquent motor fuel retailers is refusal to renew their business licenses. Section 8.1806 will allow the Village to proceed against tax delinquent gas station operators in the same way it does against restaurant owners who do not pay the Mount Prospect food and beverage tax. The goal of Section 8.1806 is to provide the Finance Department with a procedure it can use to encourage timely payment of the Village's motor fuel tax. SECTION 13: It is recommended that Section 8.1806, "Effective Date," to Article XVIII, "Municipal Motor Fuel Tax," be re-identified as Section 8.1807 to reflect the addition of the new Section 8.1806, "Enforcement; License Suspension, Revocation," to Article XVIII. SECTION Iii: Section 8.2301, "Regulations," Subsection B, "Tax Imposed," of Article XXIII, "Movie Theater Tax," imposes a twenty-five cents ($0.25) tax on every admission to a movie theater within the village corporate limits. The tax can be itemized and charged separately or not. It is recommended that this movie theater tax be removed from Chapter 8 and moved to Appendix A — Division II, "Fees, Rates and Taxes" where the various taxes established by Chapter 8 are set forth. SECTION 15: It is recommended that Section 8.606 B, "Penalties (Employee Organizations)," of Appendix A, Division III, "Penalties and Fines," be deleted in its entirety. The language of Section 8.606 B currently reads: "Fine. Not less than $100.00 nor more than $1,000.00." This section of Appendix A, Division III now is obsolete since all of Article VI of Chapter 8 of the Mount Prospect Village Code will be deleted. SECTION 16: It is recommended that Section 8.1502 B, "Tax Imposed (Telecommunications)," of Appendix A, Division II, "Fees, Rates and Taxes," be deleted in its entirety. The language of Section 8.150 B currently reads: "Rate: 6% of gross charge." This section of Appendix A, Division II now is obsolete because Subsection B of Section 8.1502, N "Tax Imposed, " of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code will be deleted. Chapter 6 Amendments SECTION 1: It is recommended that Section 6.104, "Registration," of Article I, "General," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," be deleted in its entirety because it has been preempted by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and/or the Illinois Cable and Video Competition Act.. SECTION 2: It is recommended that Section 6.105, "Telecommunications License," of Article I, "General," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code be deleted in its entirety because it has been preempted by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and/or the Illinois Cable and Video Competition Act. SECTION 3: It is recommended that Section 6.106, "Telecommunications Franchise," of Article I, "General," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code be deleted in its entirety because it has been preempted by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and/or the Illinois Cable and Video Competition Act. SECTION 4: It is recommended that Section 6.107, "Cable Television Franchise," of Article 1, "General," of Chapter 6, Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended to be and read as follows: Except as otherwise provided herein, any telecommunications carriers who desire to construct, install, operate, maintain or locate telecommunications facilities in any public way of the village for the purpose of providing cable service to persons in the village shall first obtain a cable franchise from the village as provided in Article V of this chapter, or from the State of Illinois." The amendment means that the Village Code reflects the language of the Illinois Cable and Video Competition Act. 7 SECTION 5: It is recommended that Article II, "Registration of Telecommunications Carriers and Providers," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code be deleted in its entirety because it has been preempted by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and/or the Illinois Cable and Video Competition Act. SECTION 6: It is recommended that Article IV, "Telecommunications Franchise," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code be deleted in its entirety because it has been preempted by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 and/or the Illinois Cable and Video Competition Act. 8 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPER 6, "TELECOMMUNICATIONS CODE," OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: Delete Section 6.104, "Registration," of Article I, "General," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 2: Delete Section 6.105, "Telecommunications License," of Article I, "General," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 3: Delete Section 6.106, "Telecommunications Franchise," of Article I, "General," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 4: Section 6.107, "Cable Television Franchise," of Article 1, "General," of Chapter 6, Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended to be and read as follows: Except as otherwise provided herein, any telecommunications carriers who desire to construct, install, operate, maintain or locate telecommunications facilities in any public way of the village for the purpose of providing cable service to persons in the village shall first obtain a cable franchise from the village as provided in Article V of this chapter, or from the State of Illinois." SECTION 5: Delete Article II, "Registration of Telecommunications Carriers and Providers," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. 352630_1 SECTION 6: Delete Article IV, "Telecommunications Franchise," of Chapter 6, "Telecommunications Code," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 7: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES- YES: NAYS- NAYS: ABSENT- ABSENT: PASSED PASSED AND APPROVED this ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk 352630_1 day of , 2015. Arlene A. Juracek, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, "VILLAGE GOVERNMENT MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS," OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS BE IT ORDAINED BY MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: Delete Section 8.103, "Term of Office; Vacancies," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 2: Delete Section 8.104, "Monies Received," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 3: Section 8.105, "Oath," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended to be and read as follows: Every elected officer and all police officers in the Mount Prospect Police Department and all Mount Prospect Fire Department firefighters shall, before entering upon their duties, take the oath prescribed by statute. SECTION 4: Delete Section 8.108, "Records," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 5: Section 8.111, Subsection A, "Termination of Office," of Article I, "Officers; Employees," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended to be and read as: Every elected officer at the conclusion of his or her term in office shall deliver to his or her successor all books, documents and records which 351912_1 may be the property of the Village; and if no successor has been appointed within one week after the termination of office, such property shall be delivered to the Village Clerk. Every employee, upon the end of his or her employment for any cause whatsoever, shall deliver to his or her Department Head all books, documents and records which may be the property of the Village. SECTION 6: Section 8.115, "Conflicts of Interest," Subsection F (1), "Disclosure Statements," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended to read as: All public officials shall file with the village clerk each year a disclosure statement. The "Disclosure Statement" set forth in Subsection F (1) shall be deleted in its entirety. SECTION 7: Delete Section 8.509, "Submitting Questions of Public Policy," of Article V, "Other Regulations," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 8: Delete Article VI, "Employee Organizations," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety and reserve this Article for future consideration. SECTION 9: Section 8.701, Subsection A, "Succession in the Event of Emergency," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended to be and read as: A. If, during an emergency or natural disaster, the village manager dies or is rendered incapable, by absence or otherwise, of performing the duties of the office, the office shall be filled without the necessity of action of the board of trustees in the following order of preference until such time as a successor is named and takes office in the manner provided by law - 1 . aw: 1. The coordinator of the Mount Prospect emergency management agency or the Fire Chief; then 2. Assistant village manager; then 351912_1 3. Chief of police; then 4. Director of finance. SECTION 10: Delete Section 8.805, "Declaration Forms," Subsection B, Article VIII, "Real Estate Transfer Tax," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 11: Section 8.1502, "Tax Imposed," of Article XV, "Simplified Municipal Telecommunications Tax," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be amended by deleting Subsections B and C in their entirety. SECTION 12: Add a new Section 8.1806, "Enforcement; License Suspension, Revocation," to Article XVIII, "Municipal Motor Fuel Tax," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code that shall read as follows: Payment and collection of the municipal motor fuel tax and any payment penalty may be enforced by action in any court of competent jurisdiction and failure to collect, account for and pay over said tax and any payment penalty shall be cause for suspension or revocation of any village license issued to a motor fuel retailer related to the conduct of business in the village applicable to the premises thereof, all in addition to any other penalties in this article. Such suspension and revocation shall take place as follows: The village manager or his or her designee shall notify the licensee in writing that if all violations of the provisions set forth in Sections 8.1802, 8.1803 and 8.1804 of Article XVIII are not cured within seventy-two (72) hours, that such license shall be suspended for a period of thirty (30) days, or until all violations are cured, whichever comes first. If all violations are not cured within the thirty (30) day time period, the license shall be automatically revoked and may be reinstated only upon all violations being cured and upon the applicant proceeding as if a new 351912_1 license were being sought. The licensee shall have seventy-two (72) hours from the time of the receipt of the aforesaid notice to appeal this suspension. Said appeal shall be to the village manager. A hearing shall be had on the appeal within ten (10) days of the filing of the request for appeal. The only issue to be determined by the village manager hearing the appeal is whether or not violations of these provisions have occurred. If the village manager is convinced by a preponderance of the evidence that a violation has occurred, then the suspension and revocation portions of this enforcement section shall be mandatory. No stays may be issued pending an appeal and no extensions of time may be granted as a result on an appeal. SECTION 13: Section 8.1806, "Effective Date," to Article XVIII, "Municipal Motor Fuel Tax," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code that shall be renumbered as Section 8.1807. SECTION 14: Section 8.2301 "Regulations," Subsection B, "Tax Imposed," of Article XXIII, "Movie Theater Tax," of Chapter 8, "Village Government Miscellaneous Provisions," of the Mount Prospect Village Code shall be removed and moved to Appendix A — Division 11, "Fees, Rates And Taxes," of the Mount Prospect Village Code. SECTION 15: Delete Section 8.606 B "Penalties (Employee Organizations)," of Appendix A, Division 111, "Penalties and Fines," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. SECTION 16: Delete Section 8.1502 B "Tax Imposed (Telecommunications)," of Appendix A, Division 11, "Fees, Rates and Taxes," of the Mount Prospect Village Code in its entirety. 351912_1 SECTION 17: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES- YES: NAYS- NAYS: ABSENT- ABSENT: PASSED PASSED AND APPROVED this ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell, Village Clerk 351912_1 day of , 2015. Arlene A. Juracek, Mayor