Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. New Business 11/05/2014Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: OCTOBER 24, 2014 Moll t Prospect SUBJECT: PZ -32-14 / 1900 LONNQUIST BLVD. & 1901 ESTATES DR. / ZMA, CU, VAR The Petitioner is proposing to construct an Early Learning Center building addition to Holmes Junior High and modify the existing drop-off areas located along Lonnquist Boulevard. The Petitioner is seeking to rezone one of the five parcels that make up the Subject Property, a Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development to allow two principal buildings on a zoning lot, and a Variation to the parking lot setback requirement (from 30 feet to 10 feet) along the south property line (Lonnquist Boulevard). The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the requests on Thursday, October 23, and by a vote of 7-0, recommended approval of each of the following motions: A. A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 from R -X Single Family Residence to R-1 Single -Family Residence; B. A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development consisting of two (2) principal buildings; and C. A Variation to allow a ten foot (10') parking lot setback along the south property line; subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Details of the proceedings and items discussed during the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing are included in the attached minutes. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review and consideration at their November 5, 2014 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. VVillim-i J. Cooney, Jr., AICP MAYORVILLAGEMANAGER ArleneA.JuracekMichaelE.Janonis TRUSTEESVILLAGECLERK PaulWm.HoefertM.LisaAngell A.JohnKorn JohnJ.Matuszak StevenS.PolitPhone:847/3926000 RichardF.RogersFax:847/3926022 MichaelA.Zadel½½½Ȍ³µ»´º¶¸µ¹¶«©ºȌµ¸­ VillageofMountProspect 50SouthEmersonStreet,MountProspect,Illinois60056 October 24, 2014 Tony Rossi C.C.S.D. 59 rossi.tony@ccsd59.org Via Email: PZ-32-14 / 1900 W. LONNQUIST BLVD. & 1901 ESTATES DR. / ZMA, CU & VAR Re: Dear Mr. Rossi, approves After reviewing your case, the Planning & Zoning Commission voted 7-0 that the Village Board the following requests: A.A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 from R-X Single Family Residence to R-1 Single-Family Residence; B.A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development consisting of two (2) principal buildings; and C.A Variation to allow a ten foot (10’) parking lot setback along the south property line; subject to the following conditions; 1)Approval of a Plat of Consolidation. 2)Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Applied, a division of rtm dated 10/23/14; 3)Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by Hitchcock Design Group dated 9/11/14, but revised to comply with Article XXIII of the Village Code; 4)Development of the site in general conformance with the photometric plan prepared by Applied, a division of rtm dated 9/11/14 but revised to comply with Sections 14.314 and 14.2219 of the Village Code; 5)Submittal of final civil engineering plans for review and approval by the Village. The engineering plans shall include all site work including utilities, storm water detention, and associated improvements; 6)Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code regulations, lighting regulations, landscape regulations; and building regulations; and 7)A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. PZ-32-14 Page 2 The Village Board will consider the request, and a first reading of the ordinance, during their regular meeting on November 5, 2014. The second reading and final action by the Village Board is tentatively scheduled for November 18, 2014. Your/your representatives’ attendance at both meetings is required. The meetings are held th at 50 S. Emerson Street, and start at 7 pm. If you cannot attend the November 5 meeting, please contact staff immediately so we may reschedule your case. th The Village Board may waive the second reading and take final action at the November 5 meeting, following a written request from you and approval of the waiver by the Village Board. If you would like to have the Village Board waive the second reading, please submit a letter to Bill Cooney, Director of Community Development, no later than Wednesday, October 29, 2014. Feel free to contact me at (847) 818-5314 if you have any questions or require clarification on this letter. Sincerely, Consuelo Andrade Senior Planner c:Planning & Zoning File Scott Digilio, Applied a division of rtm, Via Email: Scott.digilio@rtmassociates.com c:\\users\\npietrzy\\appdata\\local\\microsoft\\windows\\temporary internet files\\content.outlook\\qgop8s1g\\pz-32-14 1900 w lonnquist blvd 1901 estates dr _ c c s d 59 (zma cu var) (2).docx COMMUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 October 24, 2014 William J. Cooney AICP Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Mr. Cooney, The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of Case PZ -32-14 by a 7-0 vote which included: 1. A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 from R -X Single Family Residence to R-1 Single -Family Residence; 2. A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development consisting of two (2) principal buildings; and 3. A Variation to allow a ten foot (10') parking lot setback along the south property line. Our request is scheduled to go before the Village Board for the ordinance's first reading November 5, 2014. We are requesting that the Village Board waive the second reading, tentatively scheduled for November 18, 2014, and take final action at the November 5, 2014 meeting. We are anxious to start the project as soon as possible to facilitate opening August, 2015 for the start of school. appreciate your assistance in facilitating this request. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at 847-593-4325. Sincerely, Tony Rossi Executive Director for Facilities and Operations c: Dr. Art Fessler, Superintendent CCSD59 Facilities & operations 2123 S. Arlington Heights Road - Arlington Heights, IL 60005 P: (847) 593-4323 1 F: (847) 593-4410 1 ccsd59.orq Andrade, Consuelo From: Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 7:13 PM To: Andrade, Consuelo Subject: Comment regarding case PZ -32-14 Hello, I would like to comment on case PZ -32-14 regarding the variance that the petitioner is requesting for the addition to Holmes Junior High School. I would ask that the Planning and Zoning Commission consider requiring the redesign of the petitioner's parking lot to ensure that all of the neighbors whose property backs up to the school district's property have at least 130 feet of green space between their homes and the proposed parking lot. The 130 foot buffer is the minimum amount of green space which is currently planned to be between the planned addition and the homeowners' property lines on Crestwood. I would also ask the Planning and Zoning Commission to please consider the increased amount of traffic and congestion which would result from the building of the parking lot and its impact on the surrounding community. Thank you, This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com =�r--------mom \s � � r 4- 4- 4- 0� 4— o a M o iF 0 Q - Y SOUTH PARKING STALL COUNT m REGULAR SPACES 73 ACCESSIBLE SPACES 6 W TOTAL SPACES 79 N c.� offz_ Y �rno� v Z W aUpU� cl JJO�� FOa W. LONNQUIST M a -r �ro� d — — s 614.LTA -----_-- ------- - — - - ------, - T-��_ ==�i- ---------------------------------------------� r--------_-�-----------_--------�-- --------; __- �- -�� ;_�� , -- ------� - .002 X 1 APPLIED a division of tram October 16, 2014 Consuelo Andrade. Senior Planner Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Re: Early Learning Center Community Consolidated School District 59 Mt. Prospect, IL Dear Ms. Andrade: Per our conversations, please see the below responses to why we still are requesting a parking lot variance for the proposed parking lots at the above referenced project: 1. The perpendicular dimensions of the angled parking stalls must remain as shown in order to accommodate the Village's 18' stall length or 16' stall length along the south side of the parking lot which accounts for 2' of overhang. These stall lengths are both Village and industry standards. 2. The 4' sidewalk between the parking lot and the student drop-off lane cannot be reduced for safety reasons. It is a minimum sidewalk width for pedestrians to walk between the parking lot and driveway. This is also the reason the north parking stall lengths cannot be reduced to allow overhang into this sidewalk. 3. The width of the 10' sidewalk along the north side of the student drop-off lane cannot be reduced due to student safety. This sidewalk will be used for school officials to walk to the cars to accompany the students from the cars to the school. 4. The 16' face -face (17' back of curb to back of curb) width of the student drop-off lane is being increased to 18' face -face (19' back of curb to back of curb) in order to more safely allow vehicles to pass parked or stalled vehicles. 5. The landscape area between the building and sidewalk is being reduced from 10'+/- to 8'+/- due to the 2' increase in the student drop-off lane width. This 8' wide grass area cannot be significantly reduced due to the educational feature designed in this grass area by the front door. The educational feature is a bio-swale running along the building from the unique downspout feature draining the canopy over the front door. 6. The parking lot cannot as a whole be shifted closer to the building due to grading issues. The sidewalks leading between the parking lot and school would be steeper than ADA requirements. Due to elevation differences on the site, the school addition has a finished floor 5' below the existing school's finished floor. engineering consultants 1 715 Ridgeview Drive, McHenry, IL 60050 rtmassociates.com 1 815.578.0200 1 MBE Certified Business 7. The Early Learning Center building addition cannot be shifted to the north due a few reasons. There is an electric line running just north of the new building that services Holmes School and will have to remain live throughout construction without disruption to the operation of Holmes School. There are also grading issues and fire truck access issues that have already been resolved with the Fire Department. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions or if you need any further information at this time. Thank you for your assistance in this critical matter. Respectfully submitted, Applied, a division of RTM. ',-� ' --- Scott DiGilio, P.E. Principal cc: Tony Rossi, Executive Director for Facilities and Operations - CCSD 59 Patrick Brosnan, President - Legat Architects engineering consultants 1 715 Ridgeview Drive, McHenry, IL 60050 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department CASE SUMMARY — PZ- 32-14 LOCATION: 1900 Lonnquist Boulevard, 1901 Estates Drive PETITIONER: Community Consolidated School District 59 OWNER: Community Consolidated School District 59 r lu PARCEL #: 08-10-402-014, 08-10-402-019, 08-10-402-020, 08-10-402-022, 08-10-402-026 LOT SIZE: 16.316 acres (710,724 square feet) ZONING: R -X Single -Family and R-1 Single -Family LAND USE: Elementary Schools REQUESTS: 1) Rezone PIN 08-10-402-026 from R -X Single Family to R-1 Single Family 2) Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development 3) Variation to the parking lot setback requirement LOCATION MAP a W I LOCATION MAP a I V.S, �•'.. 4:�w.�_.��..----'.a � I� X4.1—�..F II'�I Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM ifel FROM: DATE: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JOSEPH P. DONNELLY, CHAIRPERSON CONSUELO ANDRADE, SENIOR PLANNER OCTOBER 8, 2014 OCTOBER 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 / 1900 W. LONNQUIST BLVD. & 1901 ESTATES DR. / ZMA (RX TO R1), CONDITIONAL USE (PUD) & VARIATION (PARKING LOT SETBACK) A public hearing has been scheduled for the October 23, 2014 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to review the application by Community Consolidated School District 59 (the "Petitioner") regarding the property located at 1900 W. Lonnquist Boulevard and 1901 Estates Drive (the "Subject Property"). The Petitioner is seeking to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 from the R -X Single Family Residence to the R-1 Single Family Residence District, a Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development consisting of two principal buildings, and a Variation to the parking lot setback requirement along the south lot line. The P&Z hearing was properly noticed in the October 8, 2014 edition of the Daily Herald Newspaper. In addition, the Petitioner has completed the required written notice to property owners within 250 -feet and Staff posted a Public Hearing sign on the Subject Property. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The Subject Property is on the north side of Lonnquist Boulevard and the south side of Estates Drive. The existing improvements include Forest View Elementary School and Holmes Junior High School. Forest View Elementary School is located along Estates Drive. Holmes Junior High School is located along Lonnquist Boulevard. The Subject Property consists of five (5) parcels. The buildings cross lot lines and are considered nonconforming. The parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 is zoned RX Single -Family Residence. The remainder of the parcels are zoned R1 Single -Family Residence. The Subject Property is bordered by the R1 Single -Family Residence District on all sides. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The Petitioner is seeking to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 from R -X Single -Family Residence to R-1 Single -Family Residence and seeking a Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow two principal buildings on a zoning lot. (The Petitioner submitted a Plat of Consolidation that would create one lot of record. The plat of is currently under staff review). The Petitioner is also proposing to construct a building addition to Holmes Junior High that would house a new Early Learning Center, which would serve three to five (3-5) year old children. The hours of operation would be PZ -32-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 23, 2014 Page 3 from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm with limited after hour activities. The Petitioner is also proposing to modify the existing drop off areas located along Lonnquist Boulevard. Various elements of the proposal are outlined below: Site Design - The site plan indicates Holmes Junior High School's drop off areas located along Lonnquist Boulevard would be redesigned. The existing principal drop off lane measures approximately 195' long and includes six (6) parallel parking spaces, including three (3) accessible spaces. The proposed design would include a drop off lane that would measure approximately 300' long and include a parking lot consisting of thirty-three (33) parking spaces, including four (4) accessible spaces. The Early Learning Center would be located to the east of Holmes Junior High. A new drop off area and parking lot would be constructed in front of the Early Learning Center along Lonnquist that would measure approximately 300' long and consist of forty-six (46) parking spaces, including two accessible spaces. A fire lane would be located along the side elevation of the Early Learning Center that would extend north to connect to the existing Forest View Elementary School's drop off lane. The proposed parking lots would be set back along Lonnquist Boulevard five feet (5') when a minimum of thirty feet (30') is required because the subject property is zoned residentially. The Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow a five foot (5') parking lot setback along Lonnquist Boulevard. Parking — The parking requirement for the Subject Property is one (1) per employee plus eight (8) per visitors. Based on the existing staff count and the anticipated peak number of staff for the Early Learning Center, 191 parking spaces would be required. The site plan indicates 206 overall parking spaces would be provided. The following table summarizes the parking requirement: Land Use Parking Requirement Spaces Required Educational K-8`' grades 1 space per employee plus 8 for visitors : Early Learning Center (65 employees) 65 Holmes Junior High School (60 employees) 60 Forest View Elementary School (58 employees) 58 Visitors 8 Overall Parking Required 191 Overall Parking Proposed 206 Lot Coverage — The site plan indicates the overall lot coverage would increase to 60.47%, which would comply with the maximum seventy-five percent (75%) permitted for nonresidential uses in the R1 Single -Family Residence district. Floor Plan — The floor plan indicates the Early Learning Center would primarily consist of twenty (20) classrooms, office space, and four (4) court yards. Building Design — The building elevations for the Early Learning Center indicate the building materials would consist of brick, glass, and metal. The side building fagade would be designed to stagger on the east side in order to break up the visual expanse of the structure. Further, the building addition would have varying roof lines measuring approximately fourteen to twenty-two feet (14'-22') in height. Lighting Plan - The photometric plan indicates parking lot, building, and pedestrian lighting. Six (6) parking lot light poles would be located along the south lot line. Seven (7) building wall lights would be located on the Early Learning Center addition and four pedestrian light poles would be located along the fire lane in the rear. The proposed illumination levels do not comply with Village Code requirements. The proposed illumination levels at the south lot line measure up to 2.1 foot-candle when a maximum .5 foot-candle is allowed. Further, the statistics table does not break down the illumination levels as measured at the lot lines and parking lot area. Uniformity PZ -32-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 23, 2014 Page 4 levels for the parking lot areas were also not provided. The Petitioner has not requested relief from the lighting regulations and will be required to submit a revised photometric plan that complies with the Village Code's lighting regulations. Landscaping - The landscape plan indicates the proposed parking lot landscaping and building foundation landscaping. As shown, the landscape plan would not comply with the Village Code's landscape requirements: • The plan indicates six (6) shade trees when a total of eleven (11) shade trees are required along the south property line (on private property). • The plan only indicates trees along the south lot line when continuous landscaping across one hundred percent (100%) of the street frontage is required because the parking lots would be across from residential. Landscaping shall be a minimum height of three feet (3') and at least fifty percent (50%) evergreen. • Seed is proposed when sod is required. • The parking rows with over seventeen (17) parking spaces do not provide a planting island when Village Code requires a planting island for every seventeen (17) parking spaces. The planting island shall measure at least one hundred twenty (120) square feet in area, and at least seven feet (7') in width, as measured back of curb to back of curb. The Petitioner has not requested any other relief from the landscape requirements and will be required to revise the landscape plan to meet Code. A detailed landscape plan that includes specifics regarding the species name, size, and quantity of each plant material will be required. GENERAL ZONING COMPLIANCE The following table summarizes the R1 District and the Petitioner's proposal. The italicized item requires Variation approval. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS Engineering Department- The proposed improvements within the public right of way, connections to the public utilities, and stormwater management facilities will require a building permit prior to beginning work on these items. The stormwater management facilities will be required to be designed to meet all Village and MWRD requirements. In the event of a storm greater than the 100 -Year design storm, an overflow route will be required to direct the excess stormwater runoff toward Lonnquist Blvd., and away from the neighboring properties. Before the final detention storage chamber is installed, but in conjunction with the foundation work, a temporary storage/settling basin shall be installed. This temporary basin shall satisfy all Village and MWRD requirements, and shall include the establishment of an overland overflow path. Traffic control improvements such as RI Requirements Proposed Development Setbacks: Front (south lot line) 30' (building and parking) 102.63' building l 5' parking lot Interior (west and east lot lines) 10' min. but not less than 1/2 the height of the building No Change (West) 130'+ building / 50' parking (East) Lot Coverage 75% Maximum 60.47% Height 35' 14-22' ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS Engineering Department- The proposed improvements within the public right of way, connections to the public utilities, and stormwater management facilities will require a building permit prior to beginning work on these items. The stormwater management facilities will be required to be designed to meet all Village and MWRD requirements. In the event of a storm greater than the 100 -Year design storm, an overflow route will be required to direct the excess stormwater runoff toward Lonnquist Blvd., and away from the neighboring properties. Before the final detention storage chamber is installed, but in conjunction with the foundation work, a temporary storage/settling basin shall be installed. This temporary basin shall satisfy all Village and MWRD requirements, and shall include the establishment of an overland overflow path. Traffic control improvements such as PZ -32-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 23, 2014 Page 5 reworking the existing island in Lonnquist Blvd. to create a left turn lane into the new driveway near the east property line and increasing the separation between the entrance and exit lanes opposite Deborah Lane shall be explored and implemented as appropriate. Fire Department — The driveways accessing the site's fire lanes will be required to have curbs that allow for fire department access from all directions. The north and south access to the fire lanes must have mountable curbs. The north fire lane access will need to be reconfigured to allow for adequate fire department vehicle access. A water main is illustrated to run from Lonnquist to the north and supply the fire sprinkler room. The proposed water main is of significant distance and creates a dead end configuration. It is strongly recommended looping the water main to the north (Estates Drive) and upsizing the water main to eight inches to provide adequate water flow for the fire sprinkler room. An additional fire hydrant must also be provided on the north side of the building. An egress plan for the entire building will be required. The egress plan shall include occupant loads, travel distances, egress widths and common path of travel distances. Information on the occupant's evacuation capabilities will also be required. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 and fire sprinkler shop drawings, hydraulic calculations, and equipment cut sheets will be required. A fire alarm system and alarm shop drawings with point to point wiring diagrams, battery load calculations, and equipment cut sheets will be required. A standpipe system and shop drawings and calculations will be required. It is strongly recommended the installation of an emergency generator for backup power for this facility. The facility will require significant resources to evacuate if there is a power loss/failure event. A thorough review of the site and details will be performed when the plans are submitted for building permit. These requirements are included as part of the Staff Report in an effort to ensure the Petitioner is aware of the requirements and submits the necessary documentation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the property as institutional. This land use designation is appropriate for educational facilities. The proposed improvements will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation. MAP AMENDMENT STANDARDS The standards for Map Amendments are listed in Section 14.203.D.8.a of the Village Zoning Ordinance. When a Map Amendment is proposed, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in each specific case with respect to, but not limited to, the following matters: • The compatibility with existing uses and zoning classifications of property within the general area of the property in question; • The compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification; • The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing and proposed zoning classifications; and • Consistency with the trend of development in the general area of the property in question, and the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village. Staff is supportive of the Petitioner's request to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 to R-1 Single - Family Residence as it would be consistent with the zoning classification of the remainder parcels that make up PZ -32-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 23, 2014 Page 6 the Subject Property and the adjacent residential area. Further, the proposed Early Learning Center would be in keeping with the existing institutional land use and the Village's Comprehensive Plan. CONDITIONAL USE STANDARDS The standards for Conditional Uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Conditional Use. The following list is a summary of these findings: • The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and • The request is in compliance of the Conditional Use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The Petitioner is requesting the Conditional Use for the final Planned Unit Development (PUD) in order to bring the Subject Property into zoning compliance as the Village Code requires approval of a PUD to allow more than one principal building on a zoning lot. The total number of buildings would remain as two (2). Staff is supportive of the Conditional Use for a PUD consisting of two (2) principal buildings as it is reflective of the existing conditions and will bring the Subject Property into conformance. VARIATION STANDARDS The standards for a Variation are listed in Section 14.203.C.9 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a Variation. The following list is a summary of these findings: • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. The Petitioner is seeking approval of a Variation to allow a five foot (5') parking lot setback along the south lot line. Per the Petitioner, the parking lots and drop off areas were designed to provide parking spaces for staff and visitors, separate the parent drop off and improve bus drop off for Holmes Junior High School. The improvements will also help alleviate car back-up onto Lonnquist Boulevard. Providing a parking lot setback that complies with Village Code would significantly impact and reduce the proposed parking and access drive improvements. Staff understands the proposed design would allow for off-street parking and appropriate separation of car and bus traffic, but believes the site plan can be revised to increase the parking lot setback along the south lot line. A larger parking lot setback would reduce the extent of the deviation from the Village Code's thirty foot (30') parking lot setback requirement and allow for additional landscaping. The Petitioner shall explore alternatives, PZ -32-14 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting October 23, 2014 Page 7 such as reducing the depth of the parking stalls, walkway, and building foundation, and/or shifting the building addition to the north, in order to increase the parking lot setback to a minimum of ten feet (10'). A ten foot (10') parking lot setback would be consistent with the parking lot setback requirement for nonresidential districts. Therefore, Staff recommends placing a condition of approval to increase the parking lot setback to at least ten feet (10'). RECOMMENDATION Based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission recommend approval of the following motions: "To recommend approval of. A. A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 from R -X Single Family Residence to R-1 Single -Family Residence; B. A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development consisting of two principal buildings; and C. A Variation to allow a five foot (5') parking lot setback along the south property line; subject to the following conditions; 1. Approval of a Plat of Consolidation. 2. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Legat Architects dated 9/11/14, but revised to increase the parking lot setback to a minimum of ten feet (10') along the south property line; 3. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by Hitchcock Design Group dated 9/11/14, but revised to comply with Article XXIII of the Village Code; 4. Development of the site in general conformance with the photometric plan prepared by Applied, a division of RTM dated 9/11/14 but revised to comply with Sections 14.314 and 14.2219 of the Village Code; 5. Submittal of final civil engineering plans for review and approval by the Village. The engineering plans shall include all site work including utilities, storm water detention, and associated improvements; 6. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code regulations, lighting regulations, landscape regulations; and building regulations; and 7. A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. The Village Board's decision is final for this case. I concur: - William oney, AICP Director of Community Devel pment HAPLANIPIonning & Zoning COMMIP&Z M4%5m f;1gxa%'d'L-1,Z 1J 1900 W. Lonnquisl & 1901 EsWes (ZMA. CU. & VAR).dmx I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -32-14 Hearing Date: October 23, 2014 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1900 Lonnquist Boulevard., 1901 Estates Drive PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: PIN NUMBER: Community Consolidated School District 59 October 8, 2014 08-10-402-014, 08-10-402-019, 08-10-402-020, 08-10-402-022, 08-10-402-026 REQUEST 1) Rezone PIN 08-10-402-026 from R -X Single Family to R-1 Single Family 2) Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development 3) Variation to parking lot setback requirement MEMBERS PRESENT: Agostino Filippone Sharon Otteman William Beattie Keith Youngquist Jeanne Kueter Norbert Mizwicki Joseph Donnelly, Chairman MEMBERS ABSENT: Thomas Fitzgerald STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Consuelo Andrade, Senior Planner Brian Simmons, Deputy Director of Community Development Jeff Wulbecker, Village Engineer INTERESTED PARTIES: Tony Rossi, Patrick Brosnan, Tom Luedloff, Scott DiGilio, Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. Commissioner Youngquist made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Kueter to approve the minutes of the September 25, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting; the minutes were approved 6-0 with one Commissioner abstaining. After hearing one (1) previous case Chairman Donnelly introduced Case PZ -32-14, 1900 W. Lonnquist Boulevard & 1901 Estates Drive. Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner for PZ -32-14 is seeking a Zoning Map amendment, Conditional Use and Variation for the property located at 1900 W. Lonnquist Boulevard and 1901 Estates Drive. Ms. Andrade stated the Subject Property is on the north side of Lonnquist Boulevard and the south side of Estates Drive and measures approximately sixteen (16) acres in area. The existing improvements include Forest View Elementary School and Holmes Junior High School. Five (5) parcels make up the site. Four (4) parcels are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. The fifth parcel is zoned RX Single -Family Residential. The buildings are considered nonconforming as they cross lot lines. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner is proposing to construct a building addition to Holmes Junior High that would house an Early Learning Center and serve three to five (3-5) year old children. The Petitioner is also proposing to modify the existing drop off areas along Lonnquist Boulevard. Ms. Andrade explained the Petitioner is seeking to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 from the R -X Single Family Residence to the R-1 Single Family Residence District. The Petitioner is seeking a Conditional Use for a Planned Unit Development to allow two principal buildings on a zoning lot in order to bring the property up to compliance and a Variation to the parking lot setback requirement along the south lot line. Ms. Andrade stated the site plan originally submitted indicated a five foot (5') parking lot setback along Lonnquist Boulevard. She further stated the Petitioner submitted a revised site plan earlier in the day that indicated a ten foot (10') parking lot setback instead of five feet (5') along Lonnquist Boulevard. Since the Village Code requires a minimum of thirty feet (30'), the Petitioner is seeking a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') parking lot setback. Ms. Andrade summarized the Map Amendment standards as the following: The compatibility with existing uses and zoning classifications of property within the general area of the property in question; The compatibility of the surrounding property with the permitted uses listed in the proposed zoning classification; The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing and proposed zoning classifications; Ms. Andrade stated Staff is supportive of the Petitioner's request to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026 to R-1 Single -Family Residence as it would be consistent with the zoning classification of the remainder parcels that make up the Subject Property and the adjacent residential area. Further, the proposed Early Learning Center would be keeping with the existing institutional land use and the Village's Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Andrade stated the Conditional Use standards as the following: The Conditional Use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; The Conditional Use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; Ms. Andrade stated the Petitioner was seeking a Conditional Use for the final Planned Unit Development in order to bring the Subject Property into zoning compliance as the Village Code requires approval of a PUD to allow more than one principal building on a zoning lot. She further stated that staff is supportive of the Conditional Use request as it is reflective of the existing conditions and will bring the Subject Property into conformance. Ms. Andrade summarized the standards for a Variation as the following: Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair • A hardship due to the physical surroundings, shape, or topographical conditions of a specific property not generally applicable to other properties in the same zoning district and not created by any person presently having an interest in the property; • Lack of desire to increase financial gain; and • Protection of the public welfare, other property, and neighborhood character. Ms. Andrade explained the Petitioner is seeking approval of a Variation to allow a ten foot (10') parking lot setback. Staff is supportive of the Variation request as the project was designed to help alleviate car back-up onto Lonnquist Boulevard, provide off-street parking spaces, and separate the parent drop off from the bus drop off. She further explained providing a parking lot setback that complies with Village Code would significantly impact and reduce the proposed parking and access drive improvements. Further, a ten foot (10') parking lot setback would be consistent with the parking lot setback requirement for nonresidential districts. Ms. Andrade stated based on these findings, Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning commission recommend approval for the following motions: "To approve: A. A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10402-026 from R -X Single Family Residence to R-1 Single -Family Residence; B. A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development consisting of two principal buildings; and C. A Variation to allow a ten foot (10') parking lot setback along the south property line; subject to the conditions listed in the staff report." She stated the Village Board's decision is final for the case. Commissioner Filippone asked for some further information regarding an email from a resident to the board received right before the meeting asking for a one hundred thirty foot (130') setback. Ms. Andrade stated the existing setbacks for Forest View Elementary School will not be changing. The proposed building addition would be setback approximately one hundred and thirty one feet (131') from the east property line. The parking lot setback would be about fifty feet (50') as measured from the drive lane to the east property line. Ms. Andrade clarified the email from the resident requests that at least one hundred and thirty feet (130') of green space is provided along the east property line. Commissioner Beattie clarified that there is already one hundred and thirty feet (130') green space between the building and the property line. Chairman Donnelly swore in Tony Rossi, Executive Director for Facilities and Operations -2123 S. Arlington Heights Road. Tom Luedloff, Superintendent District 59-1424 S. Highland, Arlington Heights Illinois. Patrick Brosnan, Leggitt Architects -545 Hillside, Glen Ellyn Illinois. Scott DiGilio, Applied Engineering- 715 Ridgeview Drive, McHenry Illinois. Mr. Rossi stated that in July the school board approved an addition to Holmes Junior High for an Early Learning Center. He explained it would contain twenty (20) classrooms which will bring all the early learners from the district together at one location. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair U Mr. Rossi explained they requested the parking lot setback variance in order to maintain the green space to the east; otherwise the parking lot would have to go next to the building. He further explained they started working with Staff in August regarding the project. Mr. Rossi stated because they are a school district they must abide my state regulations for building codes and the Village's zoning regulations. Chairman Donnelly clarified the building line of the addition will be consistent with the existing building line. Mr. DiGilio stated that was correct. He explained that Holmes has an existing bus lane that will be extended and along the Early Learning Center will be the student drop off. Chairman Donnelly clarified that the bus lane is being elongated and will not be closer to the street. Mr. DiGilio stated that he was correct; there will not be any parking on the east side of the property in order to keep the green space. Commissioner Beattie stated according to the site plan, Lonnquist looks like its being narrowed. Mr. DiGilio stated that the roadway is not being narrowed at all and that the only road improvement will be a left turn lane into the one entrance. Commissioner Mizwicki asked how the drop offs and pickups will be coordinated for the school. Mr. Rossi explained there is about a half hour difference in the start times between all three schools. Mr. Luedloff stated that there is about an hour difference between the junior high and the early learning center's start time. He further explained that the early learning center would offer two half day sessions one in the morning and one in the afternoon. Commissioner Beattie asked what the capacity is for both the morning and afternoon programs. Mr. Luedloff stated that roughly one hundred and fifty (150) children will attend each session. Commissioner Beattie asked how many busses service the school. Mr. Luedloff stated that ten (10) busses come in and out of the school each day for bus service. Mr. Luedloff gave a brief explanation regarding the current various sites the early learning centers are located. He explained the need for the addition due to an increase in enrollment they have experienced. He further stated the children will benefit from having all of the early learning childhood experts and resources in one location. Mr. Luedloff stated that the early learning center will only house three to four (3-4) year old children which will free up other classroom space for children in other grades. Commissioner Filippone asked the Petitioner if they are expecting any traffic issues with the new building addition and the increased enrollment. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Mr. Luedloff stated they have had many conversations with the community. He explained that majority of the children get transported by the bus service which will get dropped off by the back of the school using the Forest View parking lot. Commissioner Youngquist asked what the construction schedule for the project was. Mr. Rossi explained that they were hoping to start construction after the Village Board meeting in November and have the project completed by August 2015. Chairman Donnelly opened the case discussion to the public and swore in Walter Jordt 806 S. Deborah Lane. Mr. Jordt stated he was located across from the school on Lonnquist. He stated that he feels the green space is going to decrease from the street frontage to the parent drop off lane. He further stated his concerns about the increase in traffic along Lonnquist and thinks the parking lot will be better located on the east side of the building. Chairman Donnelly swore in Mark Magnusson 800 S. Deborah Lane. Mr. Magnusson stated that his home is located on a corner lot across the street from the schools. He stated he is also concerned about the increase in traffic along Lonnquist and feels the parking lot can be configured somewhere else on the site. He also stated that he feels the drawings are inaccurate stating that the addition isn't attached to the existing building and should be considered a free standing structure. Mr. Simmons stated that the proposed building is attached to Holmes Junior High as shown on the drawings. There are three different courtyards that are inside the building but the two structures are conjoined by four doorways. Chairman Donnelly swore in Andrea Melnyk 802 Kenicott Place. Ms. Melnyk stated that she is concerned the zoning laws aren't being followed correctly and that she feels the school board should have to abide by all the zoning regulations like other residents of the Village. Chairman Donnelly addressed Ms. Melnyk's comments stating that all the zoning laws apply to the school board that would apply to any other resident in Mount Prospect. He further stated that the intended use of the property is not changing, and that there is a significant amount of space on the property which allows them to expand. Mr. Simmons stated the Subject Property is zoned R-1 in which schools are a permitted use, and the only relief they are seeking was a ten foot (10') variation to the parking lot setback. Chairman Donnelly swore in Lawrence Wasmond 2000 W. Lonnquist, Mount Prospect. Mr. Wasmond stated that his house is next to the west end parking lot. He asked if any bushes along the parking lot will be provided to mask the parking lot. He also asked if the school will be used during the summer. Mr. Wasmond also commented on the design of the building and stated it looks completely different from the current structure. There was general discussion between the board and Mr. Wasmond regarding the fact Mount Prospect does not have an architectural review committee. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Chairman Donnelly swore in Constantine Chicilonne 803 S. Kennicott. Mr. Chicillone stated his concerns about the decrease in the green space and asked the Petitioner how the project would affect the environment. Chairman Donnelly swore in Marie Kuntsman 801 S. Deborah, Mount Prospect. Ms. Kuntsman stated she lives across the street from Holmes Junior High School. She stated she is concerned about the increase in traffic. Chairman Donnelly swore in Edith Tragasz 713 Hatlen Avenue, Mount Prospect. Ms. Tragasz stated she is concerned how the addition will affect the water flow and drainage in the area. Chairman Donnelly swore in Greg Rummele 2003 Lonnquist Boulevard. Mr. Rummele asked if there were any traffic studies done during the peak hours. Jeff Wulbecker, the Village Engineer addressed the comments regarding drainage in the area. Mr. Wulbecker stated that the school is subject to follow the regulations of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District's storm water management ordinance which is stricter then the current Village Code. He stated the School will be required to meet all requirements including reducing the rate of the runoff and storing the water on site. Mr. Wulbecker further stated the project will not increase the rate of water flowing into the sewer system or impact anything downstream from the site. Mr. Rossi stated the extra one hundred and thirty feet (130') will be used as water retaining area that will be collected underground in order to keep the fields usable. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner to address the various questions asked by the concerned citizens. Mr. Rossi addressed the concern regarding the location of the parking lot. He stated they can't put the parking lot in the back of the school because Forest View's parking lot is located there and the only alternative space on the site was to the east. Mr. Luedloff stated the early learning center doesn't have plans at this time to have summer school programs. He clarified the hours of the operation are from 9:15am-3:35pm and that the facility will not be used as a day care. Students will either attend the morning session or the afternoon session and only a small number of students who qualify will attend the full day. Mr. Brosnon addressed the comment regarding the carbon footprint the project will have on the neighborhood. He stated that the building is being built with a high level of sustainability. He further explained the district is considering proposals to utilize solar energy to accommodate lighting in the building. Mr. Rossi addressed the comments regarding the traffic. He stated there will be an additional sixty (60) staff members. He further explained that throughout the district about seventy percent (70%) of the early learning students use the busses and thirty percent (30%) are dropped off. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair Mr. Rossi stated there will be less busses coming onto the site, which will also help get the busses off the street. He explained there shouldn't be an increased amount of traffic on the site; however, the traffic will be more spread out in the morning and go until about 9:15 am. Mr. DiGilio stated that there was a comment about the amount of U-turns made on the site. He explained that the small turnaround area where cars tend to make those U-turns is actually going to be eliminated so the cars are using the proper entrances and exits to alleviate the congestion and confusion. Commissioner Mizwicki asked if the Petitioner has thought about the inconvenience it may cause to some of the parents who have to drive further to the consolidated school as oppose to the school in their neighborhood. Mr. Luedloff explained the school district is currently bussing students to and from schools that are not necessarily in their neighborhood. He stated the current process entails placing a child with early learning needs at any open location within the district. Commissioner Mizwicki asked where the current preschools are located. Mr. Luedloff stated the sites include: John Jay, Forest View, Juliette Lowe, and Ridge School in Elk Grove Village. He stated all of the kids will be coming in from a five mile (5) radius to the new early learning building. Chairman Donnelly asked if the concerned citizens had any follow up questions to the Petitioners' answers to the comments. Mr. Wasmond asked what specific landscaping will be provided along Lonnquist. Ms. Andrade stated that the proposed landscape plan indicated shade trees, but will be required to provide continuous landscaping consisting of at least fifty percent (50%) evergreen plant material to provide year round screening. She further explained that the landscape plan also indicates shade trees will be planted along the side of the parking lot as well. Mr. Wasmond asked if the Petitioner could plant some screening material along the side where the new bus lane starts/ends. Chairman Donnelly stated he would ask the Petitioner. Chairman Donnelly swore in Will Bass 601 S. Crestwood. Mr. Bass asked what streets will be utilized by the mini busses that will be taking the children to and from the school. Chairman Donnelly brought the Petitioner back to the stand to address the follow up comments. Mr. Rossi stated that they will be willing to work with Village Staff and use their recommendations regarding the landscaping needed to screen around the parking lot. Mr. Rossi also stated that the entrance of Forest View is on Estates Drive. The mini busses will be coming off of Estates but maybe using other roads to get to Estates depending on which direction the buses are coming from. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair E Commissioner Mizwicki asked how many mini busses the Petitioner is anticipating entering and exiting the site. Mr. Rossi stated that in the morning about twelve to fourteen (12-14) and in the afternoon about ten to twelve (10-12) mini busses will be entering and exiting the site for drop-offs and pickups. He further explained that all of the busses will be on Forest View property and will not over flow on to Estates Drive. Chairman Donnelly closed the public hearing portion of the meeting. Commissioner Otteman made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie to approve the following motion: "To approve: A Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10402-026 from R -X Single Family Residence to R-1 Single -Family Residence." UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Beattie, Younquist, Kueter, Mizwicki, Filippone, Otteman, Donnelly NAYS: None The motion was approved 7-0 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Otteman to approve the following motion: "To approve: A Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development consisting of two principal buildings." UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Youngquist, Kueter, Mizwicki, Filippone, Otteman, Beattie, Donnelly NAYS: None The motion was approved 7-0 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Youngquist to approve the following motion: "To approve: A Variation to allow a ten foot (10') parking lot setback along the south property line; subject to the conditions listed in the staff report." UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Kueter, Mizwicki, Filippone, Otteman, Beattie, Younquist, Donnelly NAYS: None The motion was approved 7-0 with a positive recommendation to Village Board. Chairman Donnelly stated the case was Village Board final and the meeting will be Wednesday November 5t''. Commissioner Kueter made a motion to adjourn the meeting seconded by Commissioner Beattie and the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 pm. Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair _Tenna Moder Jenna Moder, Administrative Assistant Community Development Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting -October 23, 2014 PZ -32-14 Joseph Donnelly, Chair COMMUNITY C1)NSOI_IDAJFT , SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 September 8, 2014 Michael Janonis Village Manager 50 S. Emerson St Mount Prospect, 11 60056 Mike, Community Consolidated School District 59 will be constructing an Early Learning Center addition to Holmes Jr. High School in Mount Prospect. Wanting to work in partnership with the Village of Mount Prospect, we presented our project to the Village's plan review board. We discovered we have several parcels on the subject property with multiple zoning districts. Village staff is recommending we apply for rezoning to bring all parcels to R1 and then consolidate the parcels to one. We are gathering the information needed for this zoning request and will be submitting to the planning department. In order for us to stay on schedule, we are hopeful that you can help us expedite this request and also that all fees associated with this be waived. Thank you for your consideration and continued support for our School District and its stakeholders. Tony Rossi Executive Director for Facilities and Operations c: Dr. A. Fessler 2123 S. Arlington Heights Road - Arlington Heights, IL 60005 P: (847) 593-4300 1 F: (847) 593-4409 1 ccsd59.org W DEBORAH LANE 66' ROW M E9 ADDRESS H9 COOLOM AL HMQHTS BTH %DDD NOH COOLOHIRDL HOGHTS ---0— _ � 2eul�l me sE7encu - -- --11 G0 I _ sas------ -- 4H Q®OV4VOM----------------� �Cesa ss.� ��Buck i� PG°RCIEL it 9EXI]STIHQ �9 PROPOSED Rl J I V ' FOREST VIEW \\ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL R)=� \\N MQHOMO �� ENTER D ITI G I4 0 \ CENTER ADDITION i � pQG'9C�CHD � I I EttVO4NMCO G�9 I I — pnopOOMECD mII l EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS LOT AREA 710,724 (SF) 16.316 (AC) 694,221 (SF) 15.937 (AC) LOT COVERAGE 273,479 (SF) 38.47% 419,819 (SF) 60.477 FAR 0.203 0.293 PARKING 141 206 RK O 1 I I € I { f HOLMES JUNIOR pQUHCEL 9 HIGH SCHOOL EKMTIHCO GottPROPOSEDR9M9 I III € jo of I O_..�....�.��—..�...�....� VJ7 � �r��-- � � �Tr•, � w F•iT rr rr L 0 0 uSv MEI&, HIRDO'W RESUEDDIV MNOM rl II KENNICOTT PLACE 66' ROW I H9 II P V NN 1 pp 99FF —DEBORAH LANE 66' ROW III SIO II g SIZI II ; V II I I III I II m CAROL LANE 66' ROW e� = I II LEGATARCHITECTS .—I -I n V..ro...... emu. COMMNUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 EARLY LEARNING CENTER ADDITION TO HOLMES JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Legat Architects Applie da division of RTM 2010 Engineering 1211 To— ru CS2MDes ign Group, LLC Hitchcock Design Group 221 Ir V OVERALL SITE PLAN CP1 476.48 °�— 6oL6G99 MoaL H ocH4a 90TH &DDHI]OM "T,/ CAROLLANE 66' ROW ZONING DATA i FOREST VIEW HOLMES 1901 ESTATES DRIVE 1900 LONNIQUIST BLVD. \ EXISTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS LOT AREA 710,724 (SF) 16.316 (AC) 694,221 (SF) 15.937 (AC) LOT COVERAGE 273,479 (SF) 38.47% 419,819 (SF) 60.477 FAR 0.203 0.293 PARKING 141 206 RK O 1 I I € I { f HOLMES JUNIOR pQUHCEL 9 HIGH SCHOOL EKMTIHCO GottPROPOSEDR9M9 I III € jo of I O_..�....�.��—..�...�....� VJ7 � �r��-- � � �Tr•, � w F•iT rr rr L 0 0 uSv MEI&, HIRDO'W RESUEDDIV MNOM rl II KENNICOTT PLACE 66' ROW I H9 II P V NN 1 pp 99FF —DEBORAH LANE 66' ROW III SIO II g SIZI II ; V II I I III I II m CAROL LANE 66' ROW e� = I II LEGATARCHITECTS .—I -I n V..ro...... emu. COMMNUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 EARLY LEARNING CENTER ADDITION TO HOLMES JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Legat Architects Applie da division of RTM 2010 Engineering 1211 To— ru CS2MDes ign Group, LLC Hitchcock Design Group 221 Ir V OVERALL SITE PLAN CP1 F— -- =O LII Lill -- F— — —71 T,U-1 �HOLMES -- 6 JUNIOR -- —� HIGH SCHOOL O�k=_— Ir=- R A ,rte lip __— O e NE EARLY LEA: NING CENTER AD�ITION —AT IPIRYRPN O I �T— — -- so- -- � b b __ 111 1111 r __—�_—____ — - --- TPR mw scNs iI LONNOUIST BLVD __ — _ _ — — — --____ __ II — — __ II 7 ----------�==a- ---- tI n d I m 7C a r Z m D Z m LEGENDR1,11 111N RNN No,Eo AUT-1I1E AVII N RNI E-11 IR 1aNRIcaPR RAMP PER ARA REQUIREMENTS O PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARY LEGATARCHITECTS —Ii I—N. =. ema. COMMNUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 EARLY LEARNING CENTER ADDITION TO HOLMES JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Legat Architects Applied_ O, I1 0�0 fRTM 0001 A olo Engineering CS1MDes ign Group, LLC Hitchcock Design Group z IL10140 O 1 IN DATE REVISIONS sRv�9 111APIT N11 14 CP2 OOO�w�=> pA cPcsEo scRM sEwE� "N...Eo s wA*E RN��r LEGEND -11 PaoPo EV -11 VIES", W s-ONrE, • 0 0 6 LEGATARCHITECTS COMMNUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 EARLY LEARNING CENTER ADDITION TO HOLMES JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Legat Architects Applied, a division of RTM EIEE 2010 Engineering CS2�Design Group, LLC Ell_ Ell 3— LIIIII Hitchcock Design Group III or ZI III, A—I PLAN CP3 O = y0 m i°y y I., r btU ----- ---- - A n B,�VD�qASO = may' e F OOMID �i LEGEND s�N' _ • e a z GRADING ENLARGEMENT m SCALE: 1"=10' LE6ATARCHITECTS —1i IlIr— di COMMNUNITY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT 59 EARLY LEARNING CENTER ADDITION TO HOLMES JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Applied[ a division of RTM EIEE 2010 Engine ring ICS2Design Group, LLC Ell 3— LIIIII Hitchcock Design Group O REVISIONS svv�9 IV Uro LEGEND (see plan for tree sizes) LEGATARCHITEM' iii u i :C Tree Protect on Fence n � o li II COMMUNITY w `y eemdeRemoved oro,• �t TREE KEY CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL _.• rs "^v N Key Boten C Condit Acton 1 Frd.'nu w Ah Good Protept DISTRICT 59 \ 2 Pbe, t 'd Cht,NgApen Goode Protest Popwu t I'd 11 k' 9A pen Fair Remove 4 Gleo'ts t' th 'nerms Good Remove EARLY LEARNING r s' off' �•' I� Ar dor h v1 t CENTER ADDITION Mtae� 8 a8�� g sa8 �oa6alwl s cledts t m me rood Remove nless h 1 t TOHOLMES ! 6 Glea'cs t' to m e Good Remove JUNIOR HIGH ewes s- Good Remove GI [ [h SCHOOLThornless o h 6 Gled'ts tri—thes ver s- Good Remove n ° i �.T1b �� o ^ Thor h yl [ B GIs t th r nerms Good Remove 1900 West Lonnqu st Mount Prospect dL 60058 9 s"1 47 a Rex `�i "� y { oral h ei Aaer pl t 'd N ay Maple Good Protect 'd narx rr� r , w ; 4� 11 Acer pl[ II N ay Maple Good Protect 12 Gled'ts [' th Good Protect Le jArchibad�e Aa 'gr�pw .m �p �T norms mor h vl ts re ill 45 13 Pyrue calleryane Cellery Pear Good Remove 14 Pyrue Cellery Pear Good Remove aboll i Fe o0 e ( calleryana I 9 " ryF d h0ak Good Protect puercu b End` Cuercu hl b g' "I'nkapn0ak Good Protect ,'p n 17 Frain p yl Green Ash Dead stump Remove 16 Frar nus pensylvannica Green Ash Dead stump Remove A Applied ad'vson of RTM 19 Fraxinus eensylvann'¢a - Green Ash Dead stomp Remove it 43'"'"T 20 Frarinus pensylvannica-Green Ash Poor Remove Larble "+. a 21 Plceapungens-Colorade Spruce Good Remove "a 22 Psuedots uge me res sii-Douglas Fir Good Remove 23 Gledltela trlacanthos l Good Remove www nmzssorises rorw.n 42h ver. nermis- Thornless honeylocust 24 Melus sp. Greed Is Poor Remove a geneer ng 2010 En 25 Gled'r ey Good Remove 41 ss Thor h yl t m s- 26 cledts t' m coni Remove F s4 `R 4 mor h y1 t WWW ,a I 40 �' 27 A_s ccharnum Silver Maple Good Remove 26 Gl tracani Good Remove F r' Ervo rvrEe W 39� � ` edlts'a set inerm s- Thornless honeylocus 29 Pl nus syve stria Snitch Pine Poor Remove CS2sDesgn Group LLC 30 ? Deed stump Remove E rr en,ee 31 GI dlts t' th r.' s- Good Remove Thornless honei ... °, x y` LEI.s'y7 32 GI dila' trial'th sr.' is- Good Remove Th r l h yl R H'ichc k D 'g G 33 P e gl auca White Spruce Good Remove Ze:lencolor p Po (� V r 37 34 Wh[a Fir Poortopped Remove 35 Poll deuaa Whte Spruce Good Remove 36 Py s c II ryCII y Pear Good Remove 37 P d t g Douglas Fir Good Remove 38 M g ofstellateSt Magnolia Good Protect Npli IL WWWn g g p 36 JCC 39 P' st b Whit Pine Good Protect X32 _ 40 J 'pe g' Eastern Red Cedar Good Protect 41 A h SilverMaple Good Protect s 42 A s h S'I ver Maple Good Protect rr sr,. 11 Asn, ire 31 removes, ryp. ° 43 F n White Ash Good Protect 44 A rs h SilverMaple Good Protect 45 Acer saccharnum Silver Maple Good Protect e,n LindeGood 46 e g —`30 a � s o 3 ° ' 47 F Inus ehacena-White Ashn Good Protect denotes trees below in mum caliper of 4 SITE PREPARATION AND 29 „X28 3 REMOVALS NOTES 3 1 Cono-actnr to instill tree p t t fending around all trees to r a n prior to beginning work. Maintain d adjust tree protection fend ng as needed during prog sof construction. Storage of m nax rr=ses rr sso:2 7 materials, vehicular access, and all other construction activities are ith' thelimits f thet pot [ fending 2tr Pla f' 3, 111 li ;- ,'+ 2 sprohibitedr ' t g I [ d I' 't et I c o -a t perform I y ftrumion of r e ason t N ,u red talpayme t 'I b d for removals or [ [ [ qu red to conetruDtm p to de / l _ SW f Rp f t ay. moron Pan 'fy 'o ergs d ngdp re -rq e !m o ,c ,t a 3 2 8 ® d a „ 5 o" bd; posed nt c dt the field pr or toperfgremovals tu p t b ground t depth f 16 below er sting 3. Tree stumps grade or as required red to properly perform therk. aemsonls ao om a. ory on.r f - N L ,& mea rem n m ^a ee, ryp. `Bye{ \\ ,'x/24 ff�� A` 5 s 9 4. Protect a11'tems des posted t c tractor responsible to reed r or replaoe all damaeedt t dt prior't onetruoront y •m \ damaged. i' 3 ✓g ° 4 rX'� e 1 B yyy...��� 14 s. Refer to "I p1 f otherprotection fend g, utility and ste dl t nts a I r r n ria ;; e re �^f'=, ae 23 .m ,. 0 o �a s r 15��=� ¢ W ,. 4 '� — ao 2 a Q x=,°°r 19 a ^ 6. Rf topeaf'cdt'onsfor additional dt one, standards and notes nro-co av DAF 4t 1 � �� l �0 1 � i��14�� � TREE PRESERVATICNzDs LAN F — l Ta. Eptstii,n Fell. W. LONNOUIST k` BLVD �"�' ` .< _�'� J o, _ sCILENFEE7 N �— L-001 0 KEY PLAN 11 ooat LEGATARCHITECTS .mm.cnln ne�,m=� a.ne LEGEND COMMNUNITY� ErerngTreeemRemen CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL g .1.1. Else DISTRICT 59 EARLY LEARNING 2 orname"tat Tree CENTER ADDITION C7✓6 E11191111 T111 TO HOLMES JUNIOR HIGH �p 24-36 shrub SCHOOL Gallon Perenri al Groundcover, Annual ieoo west Lo""nulst OSeed Mount Prospect dL 60058 OSod Legat Arohltects L at PLANTING NOTES e m al'S.edi limit linels.oxlm.te. Seed to limits of grading and rm rNry erre tbanceContracpprtor responsible for restoration of any unauthorized Applled,a division of RTM disruption outside of designated const—tion area. 2. Contractor responsible for erosion control l n all seededareas. All ^» disturbed areas are to be protected w thin 24 hours. Do not disturb ore area than can be completed and protected wth'n 24 hours. ww soo aesaom 3. Tree mulch rugs in turf ar 5 foot d'...ter , typ cal. 2010 E g g 4. Redlines aceto be spe tt ad'mum depth of 3'nches unless oth— s. shown on the plans. C d b d1' s are to be smooth and se not segmented. www 5. D t l cafe plants wth'n 10 futility t t 'th' S r h t sly of unerground dutl ty lines'th h n the CS2vD 'g G p LLC plans 6. PI t d th t q tf' d d ' df the E fth 0 djdt I gene es only. Confirm d' —t,ll s ff' t q t'[ [ ,,plot, th work as drawn and i�esrr .x www p f' d. N addition:pay t ill b d for mater ais required soN t pl t thek d d p if' d. H'ichc k Design Group ]. Refer to specf'cat'ons for additional conditions, standards and Turt eee or ti r.rte,ae,rvpaal . wwwm s s a O REV SONS7777777�% 1111rerAF A PRELI MINARV e, rypme LANDSCAPE PLAN O SCALENFEET N L-002 11 So KEY PLANso II e I u' ,u CC®d®r1114L�d GkDa�MO� 9�4Gk tD aV QO a, u � e a ami �e � a iya O w , I I � rteeee,®mel 9 a I s rr eea� I I I I � �,, l _ I " I e 0 F I .s " � � Q\ TG eetl„typioal e e e e� e tt t t o� �osoe, rypma O O (� O O O I a o W. LONNOUIST BLVD. BOUNDARY SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 (PIN L'"-( 06-10-40°2-014-0000)�NOONED R1 RESDENIIAL EE�)A5 Ll. ISI SAr^»ul�v a° Eam �INL500 T o McE (n. TME ,n° axNwa xEnlw x. LL Ix °°°x �NN„°°LL 1 ,°. ,�rv°�11 x°x . nµ. ,,. PARCEL 2 (PIN D -10-M2 .020-0000) ZONED Rt RESIDENTIAL INA AT A,nx (TMI Ix x""ee ED s'o"x Eora"s cro ,n aw'Tox o Nw .,1«oaR°u°.'�1Qi, NI OF IT sLx`"sv'o sEu�4 Q, w aN00,",:R ,°o TME PASbo°ssW,Nsu TM N�1D:x eta.,« W�"MU,� �� o°"�° ITT°:�x"i�� A -ST 0 l'SAID LOT n i1). """Po"T"csawa moo IT OA'"T"ax"",x°11n INE 11111 sExr�"T. �"�11 i _ E.xw (11 A rE" (7,wn" ' IAAnx".4`°x"�"�c yrs °m° o. s .. o rrr:TAx° I. ALLEL x,T rxE xEn n). A °I"T n °r CI MR T°°, E 2NIT �l arvNlxS 1"A anx� 700 sa°�TMi O�,—AoepA- oL m ar mE�swmimwEs� c�x'cx a�"suo LOT s (1);; mwcxi EAST"i A -L vnTM 1, A ,H P "A wssrLOTSuxs as 1 o LOT x.sx (» -A aSTAxcs :%, ,zs.°o ac aIT a' °ca(r,u tiG) —TI a mE PATHATRCEL (PIN 088 -1TM 2 -02x2 -MOO) ZONED RI RESIDENTIAL rEH E1xaPi xoD '11 w (11.°INS vEn (1) A a111E c1a 9e %N II A"'vwx?° p eiroxrvroirvca(sAro Al es): cx (z)p n�msrnna or °C°ooxrra"r°"xN L141 , SAO LO ux c"r (i1, SAAT gcxR�) c v "c'r° cF. UTA E ANI a eF_ ,,- -N. S— PARCEL 4 PIN OE -10-402-019-0000 ZONED R1 RESIDENTIAL nx°Cp,ST I, MESxT L&I o�uT"lum olwNv�zs�aU°AS7i1SNAMSTH �o 11"S­ST�As cnoN 'Ao "row THI � M SAID LOT�1iix([)•Soum°L NE EOr X °F veT`Ex (1). A msrnx cp °E�9ao TOL xMM"smi,o ErEx`m.4 wsr"xcs ox �u.m acr: Tx 'ST azaxxwa °X mL xcsiTUlre lI SAI LOT °E��'(1), A IS -1 rc tz5.°° FEET ro THE �aVUE"cs (I PARCEL 5 (BINc08-10-402-026-0000) ZONED RX RESIDENTIAL — LAST. APSIS, °. A , — PIAT°O�,L"T n°Pa a 4 nNIT ..� Ix N,y c a a R ° r,�1 oy GRAPHIC SCALE 1 Loon PIN NUMBERS 08-10-402-014-0000 08-10-402-019-0000 08-10-402-020-0000 08-10-402-022-0000 08-10-402-026-0000 EglptFs j\. \, POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL 3) \s\ POINT 99).04' (991.0D) T, CORTH OF THE 5 W. ORNER OF LOT SEVEN()) c W 5T N� eeu zt w t'Oe6.o0'7 So _v, Px ET NEW�caEr SiH E f OR p' '\ ccHCRE�cCNG HE dry 1 D�N"Yq 5 1a -,x AIC IO CT I -(N 89'4 N 4 59 E 0.78' LOCATION YAP ow unE011x RaE � w �Itnwc sETeAcx aca zoxlNo cone rw Hx zoxrrvc o POINT OF BEGINNING v3 _ (PARCEL 4) _ (EXCEPTION TO PARCEL 2) ' A POINT 691.00' NORTH OF THE a S.W. CORNER OF LOT SEVEN(1) 9= 0=7 Ess \ a N[Ly T , � rouxo xax rPF H a „ °xx LL E :a - 7 m HOLME FI °�5 JR. HICH SCHOOL $ - L xAx 9xIITIL ANS MAI �"nc �EIlT 11 11T or"+aAacEL � m 3 - 0 Ea ��Hv eN uC I s I ,-I ® W _ -INI 11 PIPI 5 �a p� R ba u @ _ POINT O1) BEGINNING TourvO 6a j� w (PARCEL Z) ��pp W nT c°rtNL � zax ax zox c (PARCELra AT pE W rxc StTOAG PEA 2°x4xc CwE swt R1 iIX1 __ NG �' urv° R°N Ras ' r Cf Ay uxE 5wI1xERlr LNE oP THE SE 1/¢ n V [f 5Lrnp110-6t 1, T Cwt oN RVE p AT CiwOOR _. is c _ B zzo as care cw: LOCATION YAP as SURVEYORS NOTES ONE / �' ¢INIT r,° n mLnx .n c rH ixcN x ,s os nIiEL a Ms"(asisrj xue - ,� . . es,wwc c. wum ae " -- "—TT y N , 1E s sc w ' A a6ss S 89'4121 W 330.03 zo9 wLy - ¢\ eL,w 11 IT 1EILILl 'Ell' - —' ° rN �A,E_y xEa°AT >x sxxu'T LEGEND , xLy) I) m — UNI ° °xxH E pI \ a N[Ly T , � rouxo xax rPF H a „ °xx LL E :a - 7 m HOLME FI °�5 JR. HICH SCHOOL $ - L xAx 9xIITIL ANS MAI �"nc �EIlT 11 11T or"+aAacEL � m 3 - 0 Ea ��Hv eN uC I s I ,-I ® W _ -INI 11 PIPI 5 �a p� R ba u @ _ POINT O1) BEGINNING TourvO 6a j� w (PARCEL Z) ��pp W nT c°rtNL � zax ax zox c (PARCELra AT pE W rxc StTOAG PEA 2°x4xc CwE swt R1 iIX1 __ NG �' urv° R°N Ras ' r Cf Ay uxE 5wI1xERlr LNE oP THE SE 1/¢ n V [f 5Lrnp110-6t 1, T Cwt oN RVE p AT CiwOOR _. is c _ B zzo as care cw: H.. DN'° ()N'oMNERs� Tn CCSD 59 HOLMES/FOREST VIEW COMPLEX H+� W. LONNOUIBT BLVD -— - - - - a6ss S 89'4121 W 330.03 zo9 wLy - - S 001638° W 50.00— ",°""rs a POINT OF COMMENCING � - —' cR jr OaK cl8aCLINYU%D(r'ALVP9uwT 92TN CN©m...)r- Ila t tll pJ Yl =6 "� SURVEYOR SIGNATURE AND SEAL H.. PLAT OF SURVEY CCSD 59 HOLMES/FOREST VIEW COMPLEX H+� MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WE CET CORNERS OTHER PEOPLE COT!- AND SURVEYING, 3D MAPPING AND CONSTRUCTION STAKING :,A SIGHT ON SOLUTIONS, INC. 715 RIDGEVIEW DRIVE, MCHENRY, ILLINOIS 60050 a,N9ZHL �. PHONE: 847.313.5744 eightonswlutiwn 6urwyar5s ,axu m ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1900 WEST LONNQUIST BOULEVARD AND 1901 ESTATES DRIVE , MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Community Consolidated School District 59 (), has filed a petition for a Zoning Map Amendment, Conditional Use for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD), and Variation (Parking Lot Setback) for property located at 1900 West Lonnquist Boulevard and 1901 Estates Drive () and legally described as; PARCEL 1: PARCEL 1 (PIN 08-10-402-014-0000) THAT PART OF LOT SEVEN (7), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 235.18 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), AS MEASURED ALONG A LINE WHICH IS 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7); THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINE WHICH IS 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 976.80 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE NORTH 67 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE, A DISTANCE OF 122.98 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 16 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, ALONG A LINE, A DISTANCE OF 458.58 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH ALONG A LINE WHICH IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINE 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 585.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE LINE 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), THENCE WEST ALONG THE LINE 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 244.33 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN "OWNERS DIVISION", BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (EXCEPT THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER THEREOF) OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2 (PIN 08-10-402-020-0000) THAT PART OF LOT SEVEN (7) IN "OWNER'S SUBDIVISION", BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (EXCEPT THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER THEREOF) OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 235.18 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), AS MEASURED ALONG A LINE WHICH IS 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7); THENCE NORTH ALONG A LINE PERPENDICULAR TO THE LINE WHICH IS 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 976.80 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST, ALONG A LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.02 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE WEST ALONG A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7); THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 947.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE LINE WHICH IS 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7); THENCE EAST ALONG THE LINE WHICH IS 50.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 235.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, (EXCEPTING FROM SAID TRACT THAT PART THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), 697.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7); THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7); THENCE SOUTH ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING). PARCEL 3 (PIN 08-10-402-022-0000) THAT PART OF LOT SEVEN (7) IN "OWNER'S DIVISION", BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (EXCEPT THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER THEREOF) OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7) A DISTANCE OF 997.00 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING (SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED REGISTERED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1734689); THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 51 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 157.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVED LINE CONVEXED TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 555.00 FEET, AND AN ARC DISTANCE OF 300.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), SAID POINT BEING 150.00 FEET NORTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 4 (PIN 08-10-402-019-0000) THAT PART OF LOT SEVEN (7) IN "OWNER'S SUBDIVISION", BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (EXCEPT THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER THEREOF) OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), 697.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7); THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7); THENCE SOUTH ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 5 (PIN 08-10-402-026-0000) THE EAST 330.86 FEET OF LOT 4 IN "MEIER BROTHERS SUBDIVISION", BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF SECTIONS 10 AND 15, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN (CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 5 ACRES), ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COOK COUNTY REGISTRAR OF TITLES ON JANUARY 31, 1930, AS TORRENCE DOCUMENT NUMBER 494586, ALL IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Property Index Nos. 08-10-402-014-0000, 08-10-402-019-0000, 08-10-402-020-000, 08-10-402-022-0000 and 08-10-402-026-0000 WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks 1)Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the parcel known as PIN 08-10- 402-026-0000 from R-X Single Family Residence to R-1 Single-Family Residence 2) Conditional Use Permit for a Final Planned Unit Development, consisting of two (2) principal buildings and 3) Variation to as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached as ; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the request for Zoning Map Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Variation designated as PZ-32-14, before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the Village rd of Mount Prospect on the 23 day of October, 2014, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having th been published in the Daily Herald Newspaper on the 8 day of October 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has submitted its findings and recommendations to the Mayor and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of PZ-32-14; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Zoning Map Amendment, Conditional Use permit and Variation would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACTING IN THE EXERCISE OF THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The Official Zoning Map of the Village of Mount Prospect Illinois as amended is hereby further amended by reclassifying the parcel known as PIN 08-10-402-026-0000 from R-X Single Family Residence to R-1 Single-Family Residence to R-1 Single-Family Residence SECTION THREE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect grant 1) Conditional Use Permit for a Final Planned Unit Development, consisting of two principal buildings, and 2) as shown on the Site Plan, a copy of which is attached and made a part of this ordinance , subject to the following conditions; 1. Approval of a Plat of Consolidation. 2. Development of the site in general conformance with the site plan prepared by Applied, a division of rtm dated 10/23/14; 3. Development of the site in general conformance with the landscape plan prepared by Hitchcock Design Group dated 9/11/14, but revised to comply with Article XXIII of the Village Code; 4. Development of the site in general conformance with the photometric plan prepared by Applied, a division of rtm dated 9/11/14 but revised to comply with Sections 14.314 and 14.2219 of the Village Code; 5. Submittal of final civil engineering plans for review and approval by the Village. The engineering plans shall include all site work including utilities, storm water detention, and associated improvements; 6. Development of the site in accordance with all applicable Village Codes and requirements, including, but not limited to, detention requirements, Fire Prevention Code regulations, lighting regulations, landscape regulations; and building regulations; and 7. A building permit, in accordance with the current regulations and requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, must be issued within one (1) year from the date of adoption of the enabling ordinance by the Village Board which authorized the development proposal. The development approvals granted herein, without need for further action by any Village board, commission or official, shall become null and void if no building permit is issued within the one (1) year requirement and improvements completed within a period of eighteen (18) months. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this, day of November, 2014. ______________________________________ Arlene A. Juracek Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk H:\\CLKO\\files\\WIN\\ORDINANC\\Con Use PUDvariaiontpz32-14holmes =�r--------mom \s � � r 4- 4- 4- 0� 4— o a M o iF 0 Q - Y SOUTH PARKING STALL COUNT m REGULAR SPACES 73 ACCESSIBLE SPACES 6 W TOTAL SPACES 79 N c.� offz_ Y �rno� v Z W aUpU� cl JJO�� FOa W. LONNQUIST M a -r �ro� d — — s 614.LTA -----_-- ------- - — - - ------, - T-��_ ==�i- ---------------------------------------------� r--------_-�-----------_--------�-- --------; __- �- -�� ;_�� , -- ------� - .002 X 1 Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department MEMORANDUM TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: NELLIE BECKNER, LONG RANGE PLANNER DATE: OCTOBER 28, 2014 Mount Prospect SUBJECT: COMMUNITY PLANNING GRANT — RAND ROAD CORRIDOR PLAN BACKGROUND The Regional Transportation Authority's (RTA) Community Planning program provides funding and technical assistance to communities for planning studies which examine the integration and interaction of the regional transportation system and local municipalities. The Community Planning program is an opportunity to participate in the planning of local transportation and transit -related opportunities. The RTA is partners with the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) to ensure that the plans are consistent with CMAP's regional planning document, GO TO 2040 Plan. An added benefit of the Community Planning program is the enhanced coordination among local governments, transit agencies and regional planning agencies. The Village of Mount Prospect has been awarded $100,000 from the RTA through the Community Planning Program. The funding will be used to conduct a Rand Road Corridor Plan for Mount Prospect, which will include analysis of current land use and transportation conditions, development of design guidelines for specific key intersections and detail implementation strategies for future improvements. This plan will address all modes of transportation along the Village's portion of Rand Road. The draft scope of work is attached (Attachment A). The RTA requires the completion of the governing resolution by January 1, 2015 in order to demonstrate significant progress made on the grant process. ANALYSIS The governing resolution denotes a maximum grant amount of $100,000 of which the Village is responsible for 20% of that amount and 100% of any amount should the contract exceed $100,000. The Village does not anticipate exceeding the grant amount of $100,000 and will have mechanisms in place to avoid unexpected costs. The Village is responsible for 20% of the grant or a maximum of $20,000, which will be paid at the conclusion of the project. The anticipated start date for the project is May 2015 with final report in early 2016. Funds to cover the Village's share of the project cost will therefore need to be allocated in the 2016 budget. The governing resolution authorizes Mount Prospect personnel to sign forms on behalf of the Village Board as the project moves forward. While the document states that the Village Manager may sign agreements, major project milestones and decisions will be presented to the Village Board as appropriate. Once the governing resolution is signed and forwarded to the RTA, Staff will begin the procurement process, select a consultant and refine the scope of work. 6vfllrh I I apprQOI A—n.-61y ph -ring &I a (na-c ap 201 kadlmc)trmd raid m ndnr 1lnnA0I agm Wa,d I 1-5-14\, iI1,p b nrd mcino i 15 -LI r;uid id ­,,dor d—, Rand Road Corridor Plan — RTA Community Planning Grant October 23, 2014 Page 2 CONCLUSION Staff recommends the signing of the governing resolution. Please forward this memorandum and attachments to the Village Board for their review at their November 5, 2014 meeting. Staff will be present to answer any questions related to this matter. I concur with the above recommendation.. William J. tooney, Jr.1, AICP Director of Community Development VArrfIWh I kdMPI"" Ap"at nppsV0I4lc-'tn hyr PI-Wng &H. (rta-arrays 2014 dcadkkne)\rand rand carrddor ple MIlap Gonad 11-5-IA,111oge 11-S-1 d mead rd —Hd., docs Attachment A: Rand Road Corridor Plan Draft Scope of Work The Village of Mount Prospect is seeking to update our existing Rand Road Corridor Plan, which includes three main components: An existing conditions assessment, proposed future improvements, and action plan recommendations. The current plan was adopted in 1998 and was completed by Village Staff. Due to the age of the document, a reassessment of the corridor is warranted to review options to improve the viability of the corridor. Land use changes that have occurred over the past several years include the redevelopment of Randhurst Mall and the addition or expansion of neighborhood retail shopping centers. The scope of the proposed plan update should cover: Existing Conditions. An inventory of existing conditions along the corridor should be included. The 1998 plan includes assessments on Topography, Land Use, Parcel Sizes, Zoning, Building Height and Aesthetics, and Transportation. The proposed project should include updates within these subject areas, with particular emphasis on transportation and land use. An assessment of available transit and pedestrian/cyclist routes should be detailed, along with the current traffic patterns and vehicular access to adjacent land uses. Parcels of land that may be vacant or have potential for redevelopment should be identified. Proposed Future Improvements. A series of future improvements should be outlined. The improvements should include elements noted in the existing conditions assessment, particularly for Trans pot -tat ion, Zoning, and Land Use. Future improvements identified in the plan should include all modes of transportation along the corridor (pedestrian, bike, bus, and private vehicle). Specific intersection design is highly desirable. There are two challenging intersections in the corridor where three roadways meet: Kensington Rd/Elmhurst Rd/Rand Rd and Central Road/Mt. Prospect Rd/Rand Rd. These intersections currently experience traffic congestion and are particularly challenging for pedestrians and bicyclists. These intersections are also the hubs of retail activity for the village (Randhurst Village and Mount Prospect Plaza/Walmart); creating optimal access to these sites is a priority. Recommendations may not be limited to roadway infrastructure design and may include technology improvements to existing signals, crosswalks, etc. Additional future improvements should include land use and zoning recommendations along the corridor. It is important to examine ingress/egress to existing parcels, as access to adjacent land uses has a significant impact on the functionality of the corridor. In addition, there are several parcels that could alter traffic patterns along the corridor should they redevelop. Action Plan Recommendations. A list of action items should be included to identify specific steps that .......................... could be utilized by the Village to implement the plan. Cost estimates for implementation of each action item and list of potential funding sources is desirable. Note: Any recommendations for future improvements and action plan recommendations should be in-line with CMAP Go To 2040 and other organization's specific long range plans, where applicable: IDOT's plans for roadway improvements along Rand Road. Coordination with the Illinois Department of Transportation will be essential to implementing the plan. Attachment A: Rand Road Corridor Plan Draft Scope of Work - PACE's plans for service improvements, particularly under Vision 2020. Northwest Municipal Conference 2010 Bicycle Plan, which identifies Central Road as a "Primary Alignment" Bike Route (Glenview/Central/Algonquin). - Village of Mount Prospect 2010 Bicycle Plan, which notes intersection improvements along the Rand Rd corridor. - Village of Mount Prospect 2009 Public Transportation System Plan. September 15, 2014 Nellie S. Beckner, AICP Long Range Planner Village of Mount Prospect 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL 60056 RE: Rand Road Corridor Plan Dear Ms. Beckner: .14 Illi'Regional : Transportation Authority 175 W. Jackson Blvd, Suite 1650 Chicago, IL 60604 312-913-3200 rtachlcago,org We are pleased to inform you the Village of Mount Prospect's Community Planning Application for a Rand Road Corridor Plan has been accepted as part of the 2015 Community Planning Program of Projects. We have set a $125,000 budget for your project; $100,000 coming from the RTA with a $25,000 local match. I will be your RTA Project Manager and will be in contact with you during the next couple of weeks to exchange contact information, begin drafting the project scope of work, and discuss the governing resolution and consultant procurement necessary for this project to commence. The RTA expects the scope of work and the governing resolution to be finalized by December 2014 and the project to begin by April 2015. The RTA reserves the right to withdraw the grant if these milestones are not met. The RTA looks forward to working with you in pursuing this project. Should you have any immediate questions, please contact me at (312) 913-3244 or tabberth@rtachicago.ors. Sincerely, * Heather Tabbert Manager, Local Planning and Programs cc: Patty Mangano, Project Manager, Local Planning and Programs RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO ENTER INTO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT/GRANT WITH THE REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RTA) Project Title RAND ROAD CORRIDOR PLAN WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation Authority (the "Authority"), is authorized to study public transportation problems and developments; and to conduct, in cooperation with other public and private agencies, such studies; and WHEREAS, the Authority has the power to expend funds for use in connection with these studies, and WHEREAS, the Authority has the power to make and execute all contracts and other instruments necessary or convenient to the exercise of its powers, and WHEREAS, approval for said funds will impose certain financial obligations upon the Village of Mount Prospect in the amount of 20% of the not to exceed project budget to be determined by the Authority and 100% of any amount that exceeds the not to exceed project budget of $125,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, PURSUANT TO ITS HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE: The preambles of this Resolution are hereby incorporated into this text as if set out herein in full. SECTION TWO: That Village Manager, Michael E. Janonis, is authorized to execute and file applications on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect with the Regional Transportation Authority for a Technical Assistance Agreement for Rand Road Corridor Plan. SECTION THREE: That Village Manager, Michael E. Janonis, is authorized to furnish such additional information, assurances, certifications and amendments as the Regional Transportation Authority may require in connection with this Technical Assistance Agreement application. SECTION FOUR: That Village Manager, Michael E. Janonis, is authorized and directed on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect to execute and deliver grant agreements and all subsequent amendments thereto between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Regional Transportation Authority for technical assistance grants. SECTION FIVE: That Village Manager, Michael E. Janonis, is authorized and directed to take such action as is necessary or appropriate to implement, administer and enforce said agreements and all subsequent amendments thereto on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION SIX: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PASSED and APPROVED this day of November, 2014. ATTEST: M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk Arlene A. Juracek Mayor 2 of 3 Certification I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am the keeper of records of the Village of Mount Prospect and that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of that certain Resolution No. adopted at the regular Village Board meeting of the Village of Mount Prospect held on November 5, 2014. Given under my official signature, this day of November 2014, Mount Prospect, Illinois. M. Lisa Angell Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect 3 of 3